The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2023-04-26 - Agenda Packet rCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA April 26, 2023 7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chair Dopp Vice Chair Morales Commissioner Williams Commissioner Boling Commissioner Daniels B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission ("Planning Commission") on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the Commission's subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the agenda but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 12t", 2023. D. Public Hearings D1. DESIGN REVIEW - LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC —A request for a site plan and architectural review of a multi-family development comprising 160 residential units and one (1) live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial lease area along with a related Variance for a reduction in the required non-residential land use mix for a site on 4.46 acres of land at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue in the Corridor 1 (C01) Zone. APN: 0207-211-43 and -44. (Design Review DRC2022-00189 and Variance DRC2023-00022.) D2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP — FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT GROUP — A request to subdivide a 3.59- acre project site into two (2) parcels, related to the previous approval of a 72-bed residential care facility (Design Review DRC2017-01011) within the Medium (M) Zone at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; APN: 0201-821-51. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1.) E. General Business E1. Presentation on Public Art Strategic Plan F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located on the podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chair may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Communications." Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(a-_)cityofrc.us by 12:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$3,365 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while meeting is in session. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. HPC/PC Agenda —April 26, 2023 Page 2of3 Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April 20, 2023, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Agenda —April 26, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda April 12, 2023 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 12, 2023. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Vice Chair Morales, Commissioner Williams, Commissioner Boling, and Commissioner Daniels. Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning; Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Tanya Spiegel, Economic Development Manager; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst; Aracely Estrada, Management Analyst; Albert Espinoza, Deputy Public Works Director; Lindsay McElwain, Management Analyst; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant. B. Public Communications Vice Chair Dopp opened the public communications. Krista Pruitt, RL Pruitt Construction Inc., propose work with City of Rancho Cucamonga on Development standards for ADU's. Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, responded she will be in contact to discuss further. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 8, 2023. C2. Consideration of a request to summarily vacate excess public right-of-way for the approved project related to Case No. DRC2021-00320, located at the Northeast Corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route. Motion to adopt Consent Calendar Items C1 and C2 as presented by Commissioner Boling; second by Commissioner Daniels; unanimous 5-0 vote. D. Public Hearing D1. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20440 — SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS OPERATING CORP.) —A request to subdivide 91 acres of vacant land into sixteen (16) lots within Planning Area 1 B of the Resort Specific Plan located on the North side of 6th street bound between Cleveland Avenue to the west and Milliken Avenue to the east and the rail line to the north. This request is for a tentative tract map only and does not include any development proposals or development applications. APN: 0209-272-20. An Environmental Impact Report was certified in connection with the City's adoption of the Resort Specific Plan (SCH#2015041083). The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the Resort Specific Plan and the Certified Environmental Impact Report, therefore, pursuant to CEQA, no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the proposed Tentative Tract Map. David Eoff, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). He noted the Conditions of Approval (COA) #8 reflects older language that has since been updated. The highlighted COA, shown as#11 contains the correct language. Revised copies provided on the dais for the Commissioners. Chair Dopp opened Public Hearing. Tim McGinnis, Lewis Operating Crop., was available to answer questions. He stated that it is their belief that future off site street connections will be made by adjacent property owners. Assistant City Attorney Serita Young replied to Mr. McGinnis' comment that street connections were not part of the application before the commission. Commissioner Morales stated he likes the alignment of the streets Staff did a great job. Commissioner Daniels stated he concurs with Commissioner Morales comments. Great job Staff. Commissioner Boling asked for an update from the developer about non-residential development on the south portion of The Resort. Tim McGinnis stated that they are actively working on bringing in tenants to the roundabout and the southwest corner of 41h and The Resort Parkway. Chair Dopp stated he concurs with Commissioner Boling and added he appreciates Lewis working with staff. Motion to adopt Resolution 23-07, with recommended changes to Conditions of Approval, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20440 by Commissioner Williams; second by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote. E. General Business E1. Presentation on the Urban Forest Management Plan. Albert Espinoza, Deputy Public Works Director, and Lindsay McElwain, Management Analyst, provided an update of the City's first Urban Forest Management Plan. This endeavor will provide the City with a document which will provide a roadmap for the next 50 years regarding the City's urban forest. Commissioners expressed their thanks for the detailed report. Planning Commission received and filed the report. E2. Consideration to Receive and File the General Plan Annual Progress Report for 2022. Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst and Aracely Estrada, Management Analyst, presented Commissioners with a progress report summarizing key efforts to implement General Plan and the impacts it is having on the city. HPC/PC MINUTES—April 12, 2023 Page 2of3 FINAL Commissioners expressed the report was very well put together and laid out. Appreciated the useful and valuable strategic plan. Suggestion to put a summary in the Grapevine. Planning Commission received and filed the report. F. Director Announcements Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, announced the following: • General Plan and Climate Action Plan won the APA-SCD Award. Matt Burris accepted the award at the National Planning Conference. • There are items tentatively scheduled on the next Agenda. G. Commission Announcements - None H. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Boling to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chair Dopp adjourned the meeting at 7:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Planning and Economic Development Department Approved: HPC/PC April 26, 2023 Meeting. HPC/PC MINUTES—April 12, 2023 Page 3 of 3 FINAL S' imp CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: April 26, 2023 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW - LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC —A request for a site plan and architectural review of a multi-family development comprising 160 residential units and 1 live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial lease area along with a request for a related Variance for a reduction in the required non-residential land use percentage for a site on 4.46 acres of land near the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue in the Corridor 1 (CO1)Zone.APN: 0207- 211-43 and -44. (Design Review DRC2022-00189 and Variance DRC2023- 00022.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 23-09 and 23-10 approving Design Review DRC2022-00189 and Variance DRC2023-00022 for a proposed multi-family development on a vacant parcel of land near the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to construct a four-story 160-unit multi-family development that includes one live-work unit located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with a request for a related variance to reduce the non-residential land use percentage mix requirement. SITE CHARACTERISTICS BACKGROUND: The undeveloped landlocked 4.46-acre project site is located near the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Access to the project site will be from Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue which is shared with the adjacent commercial development. On April 28, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2020-00318 for the redevelopment of the adjacent commercial center including the replacement of 3 of the 6 onsite commercial buildings. That site also includes the historic Klusman residence which will not be altered. That approval was prior to the City Council approval of the updated General Plan on December 15, 2021, and the new requirements to provide a mix of residential and non-residential land uses. The adjacent commercial development is not a part of this project, though staff notes that this adjacent commercial development and the subject parcel share parking and access easements. See Figure 1 below for context. - -— -AH c F' 7 - A 11 Figure 1 —Project Location The dimensions of the subject L-shaped project site are approximately 585 feet along the south property line, 407 feet west property line, 263 and 290 feet along the north property line, and 135 and 272 along the east property line. The site slopes from north to south from 1,226 feet elevation along the north property line to 1,213 feet elevation along the south property line for a total grade change of approximately 13 feet. The existing land use, General Plan designation, and Zones for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zone Site Vacant & Existing Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Commercial Center Moderate North Commercial Center Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate South Multi-Family Development Suburban Neighborhood Medium (M) Residential I Low East Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate West Single-Family Residences Suburban Neighborhood Medium (M) Residential PROJECT ANALYSIS: Form-Based Code: The project site is within the Corridor 1 (CO1) zone which is designated for a medium-intensity mixed-use development that transitions existing auto-oriented corridors to vibrant areas that promote walkability. The site plan is designed to comply with the requirements and the intent of the CO1 zone by creating a Page 2of7 residential component to the adjacent auto-oriented commercial center under construction. It will provide a pedestrian network connecting it to the adjacent commercial center, the adjacent public streets, and the existing walking/biking trail along the Cucamonga Creek Trail to the west. The ground floor of the project will comprise residential units with private entrances as well as the leasing office and recreational amenities, including a public pocket park with one adjacent live/work unit. Variance: The Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone includes a requirement that a minimum of 20 percent of the floor area be non- residential. Based on the subject parcel being landlocked with no street frontage, the lack of street visibility, street signage rights, and the adjacency of the existing commercial center which will provide approximately 28,000 square feet of non-residential commercial floor area upon completion, it was determined that a non- residential component would not be required. The project does include one live-work unit intended to activate the proposed pocket park. A variance has been submitted for the reduction in non-residential land use requirements. Access: Vehicle and pedestrian access are provided from existing driveways off Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue which also serve the adjacent commercial center. Pedestrian pathways are located on the east side of Buildings 1 and 2 and along the north and west side of Building 3. A Tabletop pedestrian crossing connects the paseo between Buildings 1 and 2 and the sidewalk on the west side of Building 3. Parking is provided in private garages, freestanding carports, and uncovered parking spaces. Architecture: The Form-Based building type is Mid-Rise, with Building 1 and 2 built around courtyards and Building 3 around a parking area. The buildings are designed in a modern architectural style that includes flat roofs, tower elements, recessed windows, and balconies. Building materials include the use of stucco, fiber cement siding, stone and brick veneer, and metal awnings which are carried to all elevations. Horizontal articulation along the building plane as well as vertical articulation along the building's roofline breaks down the building massing and creates architectural interest. The building design complies with the objective design standards outlined in Chapter 17.123 of the Development Code including providing pedestrian orientation, facade articulation, integrated porches and balconies, and roof and parapet designs, The design also complies with the objective design standards outlined in Article VIII (Form Based Code) of the Development Code including building (Mid-Rise) and frontage type (porch variation), building entrance design and pedestrian orientation. The ground floor units facing drive aisles provide seating areas with secondary access to the units and the leasing office and onsite amenities are designed to appear as commercial units and include tall storefront windows and metal awnings. Unit Composition and Floor Plan: The project is comprised of 160 walk-up residential units and one live-work unit. The majority of the residential units are single-level and range in size from 680 to 1,617 square feet. The table below summarizes the number of residential units: UNIT SUMMARY Residential Unit Type Unit Size SF - Net Number of Units 1 Studio Live-Work Unit 495 SF 1 1 Bedroom 680 to 792 SF 65 2 Bedroom 975 to 1,316 SF 89 Page 3 of 7 3 Bedroom 1,399— 1,617 SF 6 Total Number of Units 161 Commercial Total Area Live-Work 745 SF Commercial Lease Area 1 Recreational Amenities — Open Space: Resident amenities include a clubhouse with a kitchen, fitness room, pool/spa with lounge seating areas, and children's play equipment. Based on the project size (over 3 acres), two public open space amenities are required. The project includes a pocket park with a flexible lawn area, seat wall, public art, and a paseo that provides a pedestrian connection through the project to the adjacent Cucamonga Creek Trail, which complies with the object standards for open space outlined in Chapter 17.134 (Public Open Space) of the Development Code. Fencing: The project site is ungated except for the private recreation amenities in the courtyards of Buildings 1 and 2. Due to onsite grades, an up to 8-foot-high combination retaining wall and wrought iron fence is necessary between the project site and the San Bernardino County flood control canal to the west and multi-family development to the south. Compliance with Development Standards: The project was designed in compliance with Article VIII (Form-Based Code) of the Development Code for projects within the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone and shown in the following table: COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Standard Required Proposed Complies Density 24-42 DU/AC 37 DU/AC YES Non-Residential Use Mix 20 Percent Less than 1% NO ' Primary Build to Line 0/15 Feet NA YES 2 (Max/Min) Parking Setback 40' NA YES 2 Rear Setback Minimum 10' 49" YES Building Height 5 stories 4 Stories YES Open Space 30 sf/unit* 34,066 sf YES (4,830sf) Variance Requested 2 Not Located Directly on Public Street Page 4 of 7 Parking: The parking for the project is based on Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). A parking management plan has been submitted that demonstrates how parking will be managed on-site, and details on the enforcement actions that property management can take for parking violations. The parking analysis table below provides a breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces on-site: PARKING ANALYSIS* Number Square Parking Ratio Required of Units Footage Parking Multi-family Unit 1 N/A 1.3 per unit 2 (Live-Work) Multi-family Unit 65 N/A 1.5 per unit 97 (one bedroom) Multi-family Unit 89 N/A 2 per unit (two bedrooms) 178 Multi-family Unit 6 N/A 2 per unit 12 (three bedrooms) Live-Work Unit N/A 745 1 per 250 SF for 3 commercial units Visitor parking 161 N/A 1 per 5 units 33 Total Parking Spaces Required 325 Total Parking Spaces Provided 332 Total Covered Parking Spaces (Required/Provided) 167/167 Parking Surplus 7 Neighborhood Meeting: Two separate neighborhood meetings were conducted for the project. The first neighborhood meeting took place at Central Park on February 2, 2023, and the second meeting took place on February 21, 2023, at Coffee Klatch, across from the project site. One resident was in attendance at the first meeting and three were in attendance at the second meeting. At each meeting, the residents asked general questions related to the number of units, project layout, and parking. The applicant addressed the questions and the residents stated that they were supportive of the project. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC — Daniels, and Morales) on February 28, 2023. The Committee approved the project as presented. Public Art: This project is required to comply with the public art ordinance as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Based on the number of residential units and commercial square footage for this project, the total art value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $120,750. A condition has been included Page 5 of 7 pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be fulfilled prior to occupancy. CEQA DETERMINATION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan (GP) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GP, the Project site was designated for"Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" land use, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 24 to 42 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.4 to 1.0. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, "if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards...then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." The 4.46-acre property is designated by the City's General Plan for"Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" land uses. The proposed Project is consistent with the site's GP land use designation of "Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" except for a request for a variance to reduce the non-residential land use requirement and would be consistent with all other applicable GP policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated April 4, 2023, was prepared by an environmental consultant hired by the City (Michael Baker International) (Exhibit D — CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City's GP on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GP EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 13, 2023, the property was posted on April 12, 2023, and notices were mailed to 232 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 11, 2023. To date, Staff has received one email related to the project which raised concerns related to traffic and congestion in the City. Staff responded to the resident's email by providing background on the General Plan update, the requirement by the State of California for Cities to provide additional housing to address the statewide housing shortage, and information on the traffic study included with the CEQA review of the project. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed mixed-use project will meet the City Council's core values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and relentless pursuit of improvement. The proposed project provides residential and commercial/retail uses in a cohesive development, forming a walkable community with a variety of activities and uses for all to enjoy. Page 6 of 7 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A— Project Plans Exhibit B — Public Correspondence Exhibit C — DRC Comments and Action Agenda Dated February 28, 2023 Exhibit D— CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum—Link Exhibit E — Draft Resolution of Approval 23-09 for Design Review DRC2022-00189 Exhibit F — Draft Resolution of Approval 23-10 for Variance DRC2023-00022 Exhibit G — Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 7 AGENCY SUBMITTAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FEBRUARY 15, 2023 SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURE -RESIDENTIAL - — — Sheet Number Sheet Title G1.0 COVER SHEET - G1.1 PROJECT INFORMATION A1.0 CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVES A1.1-A MASTER PLAN Al.1-B SITE PLAN A1.2 PATH OF TRAVEL A1.3 OPEN SPACE PLAN A1.4 FIRE MASTER PLAN A2.0 BUILDING 1 COMPOSITE PLANS A2.1 BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A2.2 BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A2.3 BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A2.4 BUILDING 2 COMPOSITE PLANS A2.5 BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A2.6 BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A2.7 BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A2.8 BUILDING 3 COMPOSITE PLANS A2.9 BUILDING 3 COMPOSITE PLANS ' r 5 A2.10 BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS A2.11 BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS _ _ _ � ■ � � A2.12 BUILDING ELEVATIONS S "1 A3.0 UNIT PLANS A3.1 UNIT PLANS PARKING, CARPORT, &TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL ro l -I A5.0 COLOR& MATERIAL BOARD� MA6.0 PROJECT COMPLIANCE IL Aw �� - - - " `rw w•' _ _•_ 7_ .� ,.:__ .zt� _ - CIVIL _'� `- +�--� .� '' , "` •• �• r � SHEET DESCRIPTION C-1 CONCEPT GRAING PLAN W __ _ C-2 SECTIONS&WQMP EXHIBIT ~`�-- _ _ - _ -�� . C-3 SITE UTILIZATION .� �..� i:' ' :i ." �`r. C-4 CONCEPT WALL PLAN EXPRW 3 LANDSCAPE SHEET DESCRIPTION z ' m.• C-1 CONCEPT GRAING PLAN C-2 CONCEPT GRADING PLAN 0 r - C -'+- C-3 SITE UTILIZATION LU ' L-4 PRELIMINARY WATER CALCULATION & PLAY '•- o = ( s t � ��' � •� � ELECTRICAL « � R ' SHEET DESCRIPTION N E-1 PHOTOMETRIC-SITE LIGHTING PLAN E-2 PHOTOMETRIC-SITE LIGHTING PLAN E-3 PHOTOMETRIC- SITE LIGHTING PLAN E-4 PHOTOMETRIC-SITE LIGHTING PLAN Cn ' Z } * - LU O Q Project Team VICINITY MAP Q APPLICANT / OWNER RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER U v LEAP DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTS ORANGE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PLANNING COMPANY ALLARD ENGINEERING 0 400 Oyster Point Boulevard, Suite 122 144 N. Orange Street 3195-C AIRPORT LOOP DRIVE, STUDIO ONE 16866 SEVILLE AVE Z SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Orange, CA 92866 COSTA MESA, CA FONTANA, CA 92335 Q (415)-794-7965 (714) 639-9860 (949) 399-0870 (909) 356-1815 0 Contact: MIKE PALLMANN Contact: SERAFIN MARANAN Contact: MICHAEL AGUAS Contact: BOBBY ALLARD REVISION LOG ry TERRY SONG MATT KOHLENBERGER RAY ALLARD _J FOOTHILL BLVD. NO. DESCRIPTION Date LU 66 F- 1 1ST SUBMTTAL 5.12.22 z w a 2 2ND SUBMITTAL 9.26.22 06 w < SITE z 3 3RD SUBMITTAL 11.21.22 J Q J 2 Z Y O UJ Q 0 00 U LL 0- . . U Q LU ARROW ROUTE J NT M �i Cl) o NORTH N N.T.S. G1 00 N O NO � J N Q N ~ DATE: 02-15-23 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE z_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 L LL � oDEVELOPMENT LEAP AO ARCHITECTS M N Architecture. co400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. � 0 714 639-9860 Relationships. GENERAL DISCLAIMER THESE CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE FOR PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY. REVISIONS MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO FURTHER REQUIREMENTS, INVESTIGATION FROM GOVERNING PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARYUNIT PRIVATE . OPEN . SPACE AGENCIES AND BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION AND SURVEYS AVAILABLE. PLEASE REFER TO CIVIL SURVEYS, DRAWINGS A 161-UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT CONSISTING OF THREE 3 and 4-STORY TYPE V-A BUILDINGS WITH TUCK-UNDER PARKING Unit Unit SF Q SF TOT. Unit Deck SF Q SF TOT. AND EXHIBITS FOR TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND MEASUREMENTS. PLEASE REFER To THE `Y• * `Y• * LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS AND EXHIBITS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING, IRRIGATION, AO-LW 1160 1 1 , 160 AO-LW 72 1 72 DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS. SITE AREA: 4.41 ACRES Al 680 30 20,400 Al 59 30 1 ,770 TOTAL UNITS: 161 U NITS A2 759 6 4,554 A2 63 6 378 A3 792 7 5,544 A3 45 7 315 DENSITY: 36.51 DU/AC A4 753 18 13,554 A4 58 18 1 ,044 F.A.R. 0.98 A5 739 4 2,956 A5 57 4 228 LOT COVERAGE 0.40 131 973 4 3,892 B1 43 4 172 B2 1011 8 8,088 B2 46 8 368 B3 1114 14 15,596 B3 45 14 630 3-4 Story Residential Tuck-Under B4 1050 28 29,400 B4 74 28 2,072 F BLDG 1BR 2BR 3BR TOTAL 135-TH 1316 15 19,740 B5-TH 53 15 795 AO-LW Al A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 1135-TH B6 B7 C1 C2-TH B6 1160 5 5 800 B6 72 5 360 1 9 4 4 6 8 4 5 1 2 43 B7 1132 15 16,980 B7 59 15 885 2 12 2 3 8 12 5 6 1 2 51 C 1 1 ,399 2 2,798 C 1 103 2 206 3 1 9 4 18 4 4 4 8 6 5 4 67 C2-TH 1 ,617 4 6,468 C2-TH 59 4 236 1 30 6 1 7 18 4 4 8 14 28 15 5 15 2 4 Avg. 975 161 156,930 Avg. 59 161 9,531 TOTAL 66 89 6 161 * RESIDENTIAL UNIT NET AREA * RESIDENTIAL BALCONY AREA 0.6% 1 18.6% 1 3.7% 1 4.3% 1 11 .2% 2.5% 2.5% 5.0% 8.7% 17.4% 9.3% 3.1% 9.3% 1 .2% 2.5% 100% 41% 55% 4% Building 1 Area (GSF) Amenity Spaces Parking Required Level 1 21,679 BLDG 1 53,865 LEASING/ CLUB/ FITNESS/ MAIL 5,376 Unit Number Required Level 2 19,316 BLDG 2 59,288 LIVE / WORK 2, 102 Type of Units Ratio Total Stalls Level 3 22,008 BLDG 3 67,875 TOTAL 73478 1 BR 65 1 .50 98 Level 4 4,102 GROSS BLDG AREA 181,028 Open S • ace Required 2 BR 89 2.00 178 GROSS AREA 67,105 GROSS SITE AREA 192,475 161 DU X 150 SF/DU = 24,150 3 B R 6 2.00 12 Building 2 Area F.A.R. 0.94 TOTAL 243150 Live/Work 1 1 space/250 SF 5 o Level 1 23,483 Open Space Provided z G uest 160 0.20 32 0 Level 2 23,468 LOT COVECOMMON OPEN SPACE - COURTYARD 15,444 F- Total Residential 160 2.03 325 Q COMMON OPEN SPACE - POCKET PARK 1 613 � Total Required 325 Level 3 23,468 BLDG 1, 2, 3 - Level 1 73,532 , o Level 4 4,102 GROSS SITE AREA 192,475 COMMON OPEN SPACE - AMENITY AREA 7 478 z Total Provided 332 GROSS AREA 74,521 LOT COVERAGE 0.38 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 9,531 Buildingrea [TOTAL 34,066 o • - Required Accessible Provided Accessible IL Dwelling Stalls Residential 325 2% 6.49 =7 Req'd 7 Level 1 28,370 c� Accessible Van Parking 1 per 6 H/C stalls 1 H/C + 1 H/C van stalls 2* Level 2 28,567 I co * Two garages are van accessible Level 3 28,567 r Level 4 1,884 N o GROSS AREA 87,388 0 Parking Provided U TOTAL Building Area (GSF) Q Number of Provided Stalls Covered Parking BLDG 1 67,105 75 Parking Type UStalls by Type Ratio Total Stalls Type Number of Stalls Provided BLDG 2 74,521 Surface Parking STD 186 1 .00 186 BLDG 3 87,388 z Carport 76 C- Surface Parking Tandem 1 1 .00 1 1 GROSS AREA 229,014 w 0 1 Car Garage 39 1 .00 39 Garage 92 2 Car Tandem 53 2.00 106 o Total Provided 332 Total Provided: 168 ** USPS stall is not included in the total residential parking count o �' QUAN. RATIO REQ1 z E.V.C.S. - RESIDENTS 332 0. 10 34 a 0 E.V.C.S. - LEASING 0 TABLE 5. 106.5.3.3 0 } TOTAL EVCS STALLS REQUIRED (INCLUDED IN TOTAL PARKING COUNT) 34 w z = QUAN. RATIO REQ'D > _j E.V.C.S. - RESIDENTS 34 0. 10 4 J E.V.C.S. - LEASING 0 TABLE 11 B-228.3.2.1 0 0 UO TOTAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALLS REQUIRED (INCLUDED IN E.V.C.S. PARKING COUNT) 1 4 n Q w J co NO PROJECT INFORMATION - UNIT SUMMARY, PARKING ANAYLSIS G1 mlN O O N LO J &i Q c � DATE: 02-15-23 " � FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 67 • N w CO L / LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS • ,_ N Architecture. TM 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 design. � � 714 639-9860 Relationships. 777 `.I ,f II�� 1 6 rom VIEW FROM ADJACENT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 1 0 Co w U w 0- - - - Co w JJJJJJJiJJlJJ r- - Q - - - rlrlHrrrlrrl rr Hrrl Nr � _ - KEY MAP — 1 FOOTHILL BLVD. 75 Uj LU OE Z — �_ s _ R � : w ry a + r�y w /r > 06 NORTH J j N.T.S. LL Co VIEW OF FITNESS ROOM & PASEO ENTRANCE 2 Co CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVES Al 00 N O N N J Q N O Z~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � — RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ( 2 ,w LL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 •� r 0� .ram (E)DRIVEWAY �• ._ III 3 ® ■Lcli D LA ie. ® ■ ■ I® ••• •� �. j 1 �� • ICI � � � I�i - _ Im� LIN �J �u ' 1 ♦� ! — — i �JF1,` • .o� .•.BLDG. D ■ '� a r � — \ ti� . m� � :r 4. lid am oil (E)RESTAURANT .� �. ■ ' BLD - Am 0 .. ��'''■� NNN NNN NNN�� ® ♦ ♦ rZ �I N _ Illl;llllmllinm ■.:.+,� ,II0r.+;:.■ .� � _ i��I■� � ;, _ ,� ;; _ •;..I - ;--;mllll�flllllllll � � .,., . I �� III JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� . Nil • _� � , � Illlllsli�Il it N, ' '� " -' / �� . ��_.�-.!� . ��1-� . �•��-- •-',. NNLn ANN ■ u — — __ RETAIL 7,700 SF ti NOT A PART OF I or L�■�, PROJECT PER CITY � ��l., r f:--_�—i -1i _I _ ��_ 1��■A �IIIIIIIIII��: ��-��■ ,� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I■ � �I■�� .-- r��' � I►�.��.�� I�_ ' � • r•_u fly r, ;� �R I r� -- iI � �rl �� ; �' ■ .� ,- ■ n ■ III ' /� ►�•►�. ��If' I i�� i-� ' ��. ��. ��_A�• tIlloll llllllllillllli, r _ ♦ - —LL;_' - ^^ IIIIII I�III�IIII�IAIII � � - - � � � ��I:W.-� Z I •• •On POTENTIAL NMASTER PLAN i' CONCEPT• - _� �.- ! . " IF'��I o I1�1i .r�a�� r�c�� ■ �i NO IN�! III ' *• _:. 7 .. �' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IN� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � `I I O . IMME NO - . f ■ .; � � �mmn � nmw ' I j�._ � � �*■I ■ IIIIIIIIIIII,��:::� � / �"�""IIIIIIIIIIII � - ��::�n�lllllllllll �IIIIII�• + _ ,.x � mm�i ,I ' � ■.c:-J• : � 1 Lra■ .I�I� I ' ��I I�� 'I s ' , �® © Illllllllliiiiiii loss N son on ��NI� �� ...��■ I . Ilk 4i op Of - - - . _ f I i Ilk- q l au q-6s - �A 16 ftI LTi� � ` � ]' � I+ � 1 1 ■ � T. t Moil! 11 119 lei ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ N LEGEND I I \ — I I PARKING GARAGE 1 I _ I I O RESIDENTIAL I 0 1 I � I ADJACENT I GAS I i AMENITY DIP STATION MH I i I r , I I 00 I i I 4-STORY SECTION PROPERTY LINE L _ _ _ _ J I I I _ E. E , o 11 -0" N 1 -0• I I k 209'-0" I o I I X O � I ' I o 0 ADJACENT "'♦_— 10'-6" N 10'-4" 0'-5 1i2" BLDG COMMERCIAL w — — — — — — — — — — I — DEVELOPMENT L _ � 1 I I o o � l I '- � I 3-5 1 2 1 I 8 0 0 —� /w I 1 -8 1 2 = _ = L COPE TY I I _ � I E 1v EV EV EV EV EV w l 8-4 1 2 - _ Twim W / I , POCKET PARKA p I _ _ r . - M 1 26'-0" _ T � e C I/ - CL W w ADJACENT - C 0. w ��' ,I BLDG PUBLIC _ ° "I TRAIL ❑ ® N 2 o SYSTEM _ - Co ' I712 ' .� ' N N I -1 1 1' • ❑ 1 .1 If 1 -6 r 1 n o w r� ❑ ❑ ❑ ® I El N I o � �� F - I I w n I 0 6 -4" v a 1 /I • w I w I = 1 o'—s" w o' s" I a 40'-2" ❑ ° 1 - 2s'-o' 1 - ❑ — — / 1 — — 40'-2" ❑ J I I � — 0 w E _ 24'-0" '-0" 8'-0 26'-0" a — I 1 I O -- yI—�/ 1 / I ❑ a_ 40-2 ❑ I I,n A I " I, I BLDG / Iw I `"I 1 Or-4n I ° T i IL o' o O a / I '-8" 10'-6 1 1-9" 10'-6" 21 -8 1 2- r I 10'-4\4 — — n r o I I41 I I I I I 6 to I I C14 -0 1 4 iLLAI EV / EV EV I I 1 —_ PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I ADJACENT i RESIDENTIAL I COMMUNITY I I I I — n ---� -- rn — 0 15' 30' 60' 90' I `I�J I I I 1 111=30'-011 11 SITE PLAN DATE: 02-15-23 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. LEGEND I I \ — I I PATH OF TRAVEL 1 I _ I 1 O I I I I 0 1 I � I ADJACENT n GAS STATION MH I I 00 PROPERTY LINE I I I OOF FV EV I li _ w � Lr o I I I I > I I A I O O � 1 I , I\ I , I — I _ I I o; 10'-6" ,0'-6" N ,0'-4" O ADJACENT O "'♦_= 0'-5 1/2" BLDG COMMERCIAL w DEVELOPMENT O L 1 — — — — — I — — I I l� I i 8 8 o —�— I �/w I 1 -81 2 COPE TY LIN I JE 1 EV EV EV EV EV w I 8-4 , 2 I ` (- Z 17 I POCKET PARKA p I _ I 26'_0 - � I } I I o a I I C I / I I� s• L.-. W w as ' All a > w =_ - o ADJACENT of °, m BLDG - PUBLIC _ `; TRAIL N � j o 3 SYSTEM °° '°'-6" ' I N M N d I � / I -1 ❑ ,'-6 ❑LU ❑ ❑ ® ® H 20-9El b ❑ I,�� im , o 9 u P o 6 -4" v Y co I L_1 II _ a >/I • > W w 40'-2" 10'-6" w 0' 8" II / i o❑ O O 1 - 26'-0' 1 - ❑ r - - / 1 - - � 40'-2" I ❑ J I O ❑ It�/ I `�i o I � i II I 0 W — a. I ► I I I — y—� - � 40-2 ❑ I n I I BLDG o I I Lo ti N N - - - - N 10'-4" e : I / 23-9 o' / I '-8" 10'-6 1 '-9" 10'-6" 21 -8 1,(2 r 10'-4" / — 10'-4' - 4 I I I o I I II N o o„ 1 1 I I _ EV F.0 CD ® / EV EV __ — — — EV �d 1 \Ni I / \ I I 1 —_ PROPERTY LINE_ _—— ——_ PROPERTY LINE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJACENT i RESIDENTIAL I COMMUNITY I I I I — n ---� -- n — 0 15' 30' 60' 90' I `I�J I I I 1 111=30'-011 11 PATH OF TRAVEL Al 02 DATE: 1 1 -21 -22 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. I I I LEGEND I I _ I \I � OPEN SPACE II I AMENITY ADJACENT GAS 4 STATION OMH MH I Oo I I�I - — PROPERTY LINEAmenity I I I I Spaces I I LEASING, CLUB, FITNESS, MAIL 5,376 EV Ev I I LIVE / WORK 2,102 w TOTAL 7,478 Open Space Required I � I I X i I I 7 ° 161 DU X 150 SF/DU = 24,150 I O V � I �^ TOTAL 24,150 Open Space • • • Q Q COMMON OPEN SPACE - COURTYARD 15,444 N w ,°'-s" ,o'-s" 10'-4" ADJACENT — COMMON OPEN SPACE - POCKET PARK 1,613 W ° o ,�z BLDG COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMON OPEN SPACE -AMENITY AREA 7,478 �— O PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 9,531 1 ILJ TOTAL 34,066 � O 0 m I IIII I�I 3-5 1/2- 8 6 I i --- ------------------------------------------------- -- I 1 ' 1 -8 12 - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I EV EV EV EV EV EV --- W / POCKET PARKA J I / I I f 11ij I I c� ; � I 2 -11" hilikidl w I a I I I 53 O aB a w w I � I ADJACENT ��® ��° �J o° w w PUBLIC ❑ �� BLDG I TRAIL PASEO SYSTEM o�� '°'-s" ,1 N N , .� f— o0 U o ® H LLJ rj Elo, 20-9 ❑ '`' tw• � w I � w o I - 1 00 C '- I nn 9 w p • w i Lv III w 40'-2" Z II ❑❑❑ v p ❑ I QO ❑ u p v w f I I I 1 / I \ / I a 40-2 - ❑ n n BLDG 1-� 1 - I — I o 2 , / Iw C. I I I N N — — — — N 0'-4" I / - _ _ O �� s 1 ,_ 1°',.: �aa cos cos �� , I / o r 8" 10'-6 1 '-s" _6" L 21 -s 1 2 I 10'-4" / — ,0-4 N r —LA u� I I I I .. .. ... .I ... .. I 1 I „ _ EV EV �C I ° PROPERTY LINE _ —�— ——_` PROPERTY LINE-Ll - 1 I I I ----------------------- I II II I I I I I I I II I ADJACENT I I II II I II RESIDENTIAL I I I I �/ I I I II II COMMUNITY I I I I — -- — n — Il 0 15' 30' 60' 90, I I I I I �j I I I I I 111 =30'-0" OPEN SPACE PLAN Al m3 DATE: 1 1 -21 -22 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. LEGEND I I 26'-0" FIRE ACCESS I I 15'-30' FIRE LADDER SETBACK I — I I I I 150' HOSE PULL I / — ADJACENT L--� —�� I I 4-STORY SECTION GAS _ J STATION I L . — 00 MH ++ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT � � I �I PROPER LINE , � I I - I ' I • • _ I EV w — I I I I I I I O I I I 0 I I o d ,o. _a O O —► 10-6" ADJACENT _— w N 0'-4" I I — w 0'-51/2" BLDG M COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 I o I T I I I � I 1 I _ w I 8'-4 1 2 I �� — EVi Lv W N I I _ �I=1 xl POCKSTP- RK. i I I I I x I I --- .^'� I / _ , , 1 a I M III ce- - I 0m III ADJ A CE N 0 ° � ----� COMMERCI, ADJACENT DEVELOPME PUBLIC I ® BLDG SHOWN FOR M TRAIL —i — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 PLAN PURPOSE coSYSTEM 7L N.A.P. W - j�j I�� li ` ❑ I 20-9EJ C3 EA c� --- L Uj Ll I w I _ �I�1 40'-2" — 7� I — — — — I 40'-2" Z II / 11110 0 ❑ II, JI 1 I � —� Ld —� 10 oco - El o- -11 ►� LLD �� D 2 1 , — : �I - CI 0'-4" L. / I 23-9 r I I `l� o I � r / I -8" 10'-6 1 -9" 10'-6" 10'-4" I • I r I 21 -8 1,2 I • I I - I I E I I I 1 I I I I 1 � � V ® EV EV7 1 C�r I I • — — • • - ------ — — - --- ---- -_ PROPER LINE OPERTY E - --- 1 ---------� I NORTH 0 15' 30' 60' 90' 1"=30'-0" FIRE MASTER PLAN Al 04 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 1 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. 3-4 STORY TYPE V (TYP.) ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEW BY 209'-0" PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS TYP. 7 rd 77 B7 J1134 641B4 B4 L B7 EI , EI 2:12 ° .. .. ° SLOPE � ,. H k B Al B3 � B B2 Al _ ROOF H 5— H a a A3 B3 A 1 e f 5_ �• Ell Al L . B5 r 1 0 � . C2 r B2 r B B7 u C2;tFFI Al LEVEL2 LEVEL4 209'-0" 209'-0" I P s c. I— 10'- " Floor o Floor B7 J1134 B4 B4 ' 134 L B7 ; o evels -4) I�Xm�I L 10 -6 10-1 Floor t Floor P10 -6 N 10 -4 0 0 - II o ( Floor o Floor- oII Leve ) 11 (Level ) 20'-5 00'X6&'Y2'— 0 ERE XEA OVERHEAD AC� OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVVER�H� 0O-RE C OVERHEAD OVERHEAD MUM' 1 Y a 7VE R EA OVERHEAD R EA _ — STORAGE STORAGE —, — — _ — — �TORAM' IMSM' 1 OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV RHEAO OVERHEAD OVERHEAD K E Y M A P p Iv m z I TDRQ� $Tf1RAf:C 030 CUFTo OVERHEAD130 DUET. 03�X6.6'X2' 10'X6.6'X2' 10'6.6'%2' 70'X6.6'X2' 10'X6.6'X2' o<y ti >� 130 CUF1. 130 CUFT. 130CUFT. 130CUFT. 130 CUFT. 130 CUFF. 13C CJFT. 130CUFT. 130 CUFT. OCUFT. 130 CUFT. 13 CUFT. 130 DUET. F.CUFT. p v — — — E. LJ-L•• e e e >Toancr 0 ,•" ••"POOL � � FOOTHILL BLVD. i _.. 23'-5 1/2 EQ. B3 B3 —THmo A3i Al A3 �s MAIL 5 � r WOMEN• B5 _ y� J I I=U g ,zs�G: uv BREAK ROOM 0 Q616 ^ B 2 T H p OFFICE OFFICE ^ ,2a21 2 MEN oho , � a a I � a �m n A3 B3 . C1 LEASINGwEB 21 -8 2 a V 5 T H 1 1 � 11'CEILING J p L a 28'-4 1/Y' W 5—TH — >� L I = I -CHI p _gym e , 32 - <<B2 rC� - CLUB FITNESS C2 Q2—TH H - - u ELEC. A 1 TH ROOM A 1 NORTH N.T.S. 0 10' 20' 40' 60' 1"=20'-011 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 1 BUILDING 1 COMPOSITE PLANS A200 DATE: 1 1 -21 -22 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER 1 5 10 6 1 F2 I ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS MAX. HEIGHT E VINYL WINDOWS El METAL TRELLIS ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 4 El METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS BB BB BBB (+30,_3„) H GARAGE DOOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD o LEVEL 3 -1 BB -1 00 (+201_211) o LEVEL 2 BB (+10�-1 11) --------- --- o LEVEL 1 o o e a oo- �oo _ oo 00 00 00 - oo s� (+01_011) O - WEST ELEVATION 3 0 C6 Z 0 Q w J w 2 1 5 8 1 6 3 7 9 8 rT^ V Z Gr- J_ MAX. HEIGHT N Q QI m o KEY MAP LEVEL 4 BB BBHHE FL El v (+301-311) O FOOTHILL BLVD. o LEVEL 3 HH HF] Z 00 (+201_211� o - _ z 3 LEVEL 2 BB B w Q (+10�_1 �� o F IL-L� 7-5 L Q LEVEL 1 _=�- 88 1 U - - - - w S�MEH - - ?-z3 - - -. - L Z LF r) } w z SOUTH ELEVATION 4 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U- a w J Co i C � BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A202 C'r) 7-- N N O N N J � Q N oz~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ( 2 �,w � LL C/) LL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER 6 5 4 1 E ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS MAX. HEIGHT El VINYL WINDOWS F7] METAL TRELLIS ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 4 METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS (+301_311) o 10 GARAGE DOOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 T LEVEL 3F I FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD !, 1_ 11 O dEH co (+20 2 ) LEVEL 2 (+10'-1 Lo ��) o LEVEL 1E 7EE HEH FLDL�- �a WEST INTERIOR ELEVATION 5 0 C6 Z 0 Q w J w 6 1 7 8 2 5 4 Z 0 J MAX. HEIGHT C N Q N al ch N LEVEL 4 KEY MAP o (+301_311) v — — _ _ FOOTHILL BLVD. 75 BB LEVEL 3 0 r bo 0 (+201_211) U) Z - - 11E c� o F1 � LEVEL 2 6 5 Q (+10, w _1 „) > a 1 L J LEVEL 1 > U Z Q w EAST INTERIOR ELEVATION 6 w Z 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U_ a w J Co i CD BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A203 N M N O N N J � Q N oz~ DATE: 02-15-23 " wFOOTHILL AND VINEYARD° w MIXED — USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 �L.L LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS_ N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER lil ARCHITECTURAL TRIM 7 3 1 2 8 9 4 6 1 5 METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS VINYL WINDOWS MAX. HEIGHT El METAL TRELLIS ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS LEVEL 4 (+ 11 O 3O -3 ) 1 O GARAGE DOOR -E)- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD o LEVEL 3 Co 11) C) E,E H E LEVEL 2LEE (+10'-119) T-- i -jH El] o4L-E)- _ z=_= =z== --LEVEL 1 _ I - - .(+01_0 - ------------------------------------ EAST ELEVATION 1 0 C6 Z 0 Q w J w 2 10 1 6 5 rT^ V Z J_ MAX. HEIGHT N alF7 ch BB �B B� KEY MAP o LEVEL 4 ■ Fp P (+301_311) o U = 2 FOOTHILL BLVD. L i Lim pp pp 7 w o LEVEL 3 CD 00 (+201_211) o pp pp pp p p qp pp Co = 1 LEVEL 2 CD Q LEVEL 1 o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o w U (+0'-0") O O AL U Lj L--� Z Q } w z NORTH ELEVATION 2 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U- a w J Co i N � BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS A201 C) 7-- N N O N N J � Q N oz~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ( 2 � LL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 212'-5" of .. C 2 ><1 Al E-65-TH. TH -- - b2-TH FI— L B4 o EB5-TH - , " a [B5-TH A3 B3 zO SLOPE -71 ROOF7 B4 - B5 a TH -- B3 B 3 L85- FH kdlLl= A2 Cl B4 Al B4 JB4 B4 - B7 xQ ¢ @ 54 0 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL LEVEL 4 EQUIPMENT CONCEALED LEVEL3 FROM EXTERIOR VIEW BY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.) ol 212'-5" 212'-5" 10 • 000 . nn Al nn 31 —10 1 2 A l '� Al � om '� B7 B7 L - - LJ �' B7 � � - ro B7 L J L m � -- El �o � gm F °I KEY MAP ,_oN Ln `D FOOTHILL BLVD. B4 Q 1 401-21) o ��. IL s ' A3 B3 Al 1 C B3 Al -- 0 0 •• - y 0 0 F� .. - 121 OMER T >m� . Isxa ' 'T s T A l T. ,126§ . Al B4 a - o :9RH f:� B 310 =s A 1 A l B 3 40 —2 A3 o E� 0 B 3 r s:o E o a x� 0 s��.. ® ,� .� s.0 E sTo��E �,...� o 111. o ��FT Lu � . _J f•n — n•f p . �.__ . L l/ TORAGE �STORAGE VERHEAD OVERHEAD r 0CUR. �70 CUR STORAGE STORAGE G STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STOEAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE rr Yfti'XL_ — 74YfiY X7— STORAGE X7— 'IGYfAv'XL 10YG.J(2—��10'Y6..Y2'_— r16Y6.k2' �70'YG.iY2' �JO'X6a 1'7' I O'X6..7L2' ��0'XG.aYT ��LLX6� ikkA5X OfV0'%STORAGE ' STORAGE OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV RH OVERHEAD 0 OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV RHEA_ 130CUFT. 10CUFT. 130 CUR 130 CUFT 30CUFT. 130 CUR 10CUFT. 130 CUR 130 CUR 130 CUR 130 CUFT 130 CUFT 30CUR laocuFTD.30 CURA2 CD 2 CD — ff 2 oI O CN E ILo B4 Al B4 B4 B4 - B7 0 ol 23 —9 ROOM 1 �-8" 10'-6" 10'-91, 1 p'-6„ 3 NORTH 10'-4" N.T.S. IL — — — — — — — 0 10' 20' 40' 60' — — 1"=20'-011 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 BUILDING 2 COMPOSITE PLANS A2 04 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS r Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design.714 639-9860 Relationshi ps. MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING F3] STONE VENEER 6 1 5 3 2 9 4 7 l ARCHITECTURAL TRIM METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS MAX. HEIGHT VINYL WINDOWS ElMETAL TRELLIS El ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 4 BHL L L HH H METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS I El (+301-311) O 10 GARAGE DOOR _ � FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 o LEVEL 3 BB FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD 00 I (+201_211) _s LEVEL 2 � FIF] BB11FP[ 771 IIHIlp I I EE (+101_111) oor LEVEL 1 ____ ___- o =� re---=_-�_____ I E I i-1-15—e) -rY—ED E Ek ' EAST ELEVATION 1 0 C6 Z 0 a w w 1 2 4 7 9 6 1 2 5 N Z J Co MAX. HEIGHT N a i Lf) N al Co N LEVEL 4L HHE FFEEllE88 KEY MAP Q (+301_3 o U � v FOOTHILL BLVD. 75 o LEVEL 3 11L aBHHH BB BB 0 00 (+201_211\ o Z _ . BB o LEVEL 2 Fp 1 B O (+1 OI_111� O 2 a w - =-- 75; U _ _ -LEVEL 1 a 1 0 HHH LL-11 L J zs _- _e =.r aI_I_I---------- -- ---_--_ _ > U irZ a ry r) w NORTH ELEVATION 2 Z 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U_ a a w J Co i BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A205 N LC O ) N N J � a N oz~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ° w �L.L LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS _ N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER 2 10 5 6 1 E ARCHITECTURAL TRIM lflMETAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS MAX. HEIGHT VINYL WINDOWS Nor— El METAL TRELLIS ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 4 BB BB I B METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS (+301_311) o H GARAGE DOOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 o LEVEL 3 - FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD 00 (+201_211) o LEVEL 2FIE (+10'-1 o LEVEL 1 (+O,_0„) o _ WEST ELEVATION 3 0 C6 z O w 1 6 5 10 1 J W N Z J MAX. HEIGHT Co Alli Q i Lf) N al LEVEL 4 [HIH F B BB BB BB BB Ffl N o KEY MAP a (+30,_3„) U — v = FOOTHILL BLVD. o LEVEL 3 HH (+20,_2„) o pq J] IE U � Co Z LEVEL 2 HH o (+1 O�_1 ��) o g Z - -z-- - -r s=- - 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 LEVEL 1 --- Q CD U + r ___-r_rr_ _ - W s= Z U - O U r 0-1 } 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 w z 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' p 3/32"=1'-0" U- a w J Co i < N BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A206 N NO O N O J � Q N w DATE: 02-15-23 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 (69 � wFOOTHILLANDVINEYARDMIXEDUSE it �L.L ID) m U, LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING F3] STONE VENEER 1 4 2 5 E ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS MAX. HEIGHT VINYL WINDOWS F7] METAL TRELLIS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT HHHLEVEL 4 METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS� dHH C I) H GARAGE DOOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 LEVEL 3 FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD CD Co (+20,_2„) E L 1 HI L 4 LEVEL 2 Ll 1001111 Ell-DEll pp - -------- LEVEL 1 -_- - -_- JPF WEST INTERIOR ELEVATION 5 0 C6 Z O w J 2 4 1 7 6 5 w N Z MAX. HEIGHT Co a i N al'IT - Co LEVEL 4 _ HL KEY MAP N (+30,_3„) o 0 U v = FOOTHILL BLVD. a o LEVEL 3 -1 BB w 00 (+20,_2„) o ME U CD Co LEVEL 2 FEI o (+109_111) w CD C) a Q o LEVEL 1 - �l' U ( ) CD -- - - LU Z O U Z a ry r) w EAST INTERIOR ELEVATION 6 Z 06 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' p 3/32"=1'-0" U- a a w J (h < N o BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS A207 CF) O N O J � a N o Z~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � — RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ( 2 �,W mLL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 222'-8' 219'-2" Al J B4 Al J B4 Al Al J B4 Al - J B4 Al -11p B 0 6 , B6 L/W B6 0 — ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ oR,�E s oR,�E s oRa s.o �E El ® ® ® — — — — — — 3s,<1fa >r,<1fa 3 i ❑ ss curl. ssc curl. ss curT. _ 1 OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV `za'curr is curt L � STORAGE STORAGE ,^, STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE $TORAGE� irzs curl zs curT im curT irzs curl izs curl , OC) E s*oan sE \130XCUFT' 13;CUFT. 11 \130 CUFT. 13 ERHEAD OVERHEAD _ %fi.5'X2' 10'X6.5'X2' 10'X6.5'%2' 10'X6.5'X2' 10'%fi.5'X2' 10'X6.5'X2' — ... A OCUFT. 130 CUFT. 130 CUFT. 130 CUFT. 730 CUFT. 130 CUFT. �gE 0 ❑ 0 ... — �;a� - I 10 -6 - — - — - �"T"x I;zs / A5 B2 B1 - - f _ �aE 1 ,� A4 ❑ ❑ A417 A4 ❑ loxLl �� IWmo ❑ 20 -9" A4 „tom L J �� o vim B1g$x� o A !. 5 BLDG SPLIT LINE ® i ® I�ooml I BLDG SPLIT LINE Io �a LL I BLDG SPLIT LINE 99 I�ooml BLDG SPLIT LINE I Qom ELI 40 2' A-I _ mo A4 ❑ Al A4 A4 ❑ o u= A4 7-- H A2 _ omW I -b I�� ® Al ® � o ol ', A4 ❑ A4 ❑ .. .. ,Loy lo�Hl I Io A4 ❑ A4E:] NUP A2 1 I� X I lu KEY MAP 7AlIQ M8 J F STORAGE STO E STORAGE I I I c�� m —G1 3T0D UFGTE 63T0°—R.UAFG TE. STORAGE HEAD TE EA OVERHEAD O0ERHEAD OVE g OVERHEAD OVERHEAD FOOTHILL BLVD. 1V65X2 10'X.5X2' 10X6.5X2' 1 1 130X 10'X6CX' 130 CUFT. 62 o. m goo E I �,e i _ —❑ q¢i I L O OSTORAGE STORAGE O. 101-411 0..:.. x F ❑ VERHEAO OVERHEAD low of N s � to O' ' 10'X6.5'X2' a �o ho o CUF ELEC. _ ,X6.5'X230CUFT. 130 . B7 N so B 7 . � � 121 48 1 ROOM .— =a o w � 10 o� T IL10'-4" o� `� w I L > LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 } w z NORTH N.T.S. 0 10' 20' 40' 60' 111=20'-011 BUILDING 3 COMPOSITE PLANS A2m8 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. 01 219'_2.. 5 B B5 B5 B5 H T TH B6 � B4 � B4 � B6 IBM z,z SLOPE { A5 B2 B1 A4 ❑ ❑ A4 � 3-4 STORY TYPE V (TYP.) 0 B� � � ROOF � _ A5 BLDG SPLIT LINE L BLDG SPLIT LINE a 5 A4 E:1 0 � A4 ILL A2 B5-Tw B5 �, ❑ A4 12 � ROOFTOP MECHANICAL B5-Tw A4 � 0 SLOPE EQUIPMENT CONCEALED R1 m 91 R 9191 9191091 Mud FROM EXTERIOR VIEW BY HIM A2 KJWi KEY MAP H PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.) L FOOTHILL BLVD. B2 B7 _ �x B7 Q o LEVEL4 LEVEL 3 w Z NORTH N.T.S. 0 10' 20' 40' 60' 1"=20'-0" BUILDING 3 COMPOSITE PLANS A209 -23 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOBDNOE.2�0215134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD. SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 resign. (714) 639-9860 Relationships. MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER [4 ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS 2 1 6 4 3 1 9 8 5 El VINYL WINDOWS F7] METAL TRELLIS MAX. HEIGHT El ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 191 METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS H GARAGE DOOR IT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 LEVEL 4 LF F ❑ FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD (+301_311) CD Co LEVEL 3 ❑ FIE F71 F7 Ell ❑ EH HE EE LE -1 EE HE (+20,_2„� CD LEVEL 2 ❑ HHH [11] El❑ ELL ,Ti E E HIIHII HIE. HHL I ❑ -EFF nEE LEVEL 1 ❑ FEECD ❑❑ ❑❑ 0❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ®Du-r'_�❑ ❑❑ 0 NORTH ELEVATION 1 C6 Z 0 I= Q w J w Co 0 Z 7 8 4 6 1 5 2 0 J Co MAX. HEIGHT N T N Q O N al ch N LEVEL 4 ❑❑ 711 KEY MAP (+301_311) o v FOOTHILL BLVD. w LEVEL 3 ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 1111 :]El ❑ ❑❑ Co (+20,_2„)CD OO OD �0 OD O o LEVEL 2 ❑© ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ El El [1E CD T- a -- U d 0 _ ❑70 LEVEL 1 - ❑ - =❑❑_ ❑❑ az ❑❑ ❑❑ _- .r_ = rr r - _ _ __ _ _ _ _______ _---------- - - -- ------ -- ---X--.-r -- —S- --_-—_-- -ter`___-_=- ----=_= -ior- ——--==—=----=-=- - --=- - - - ---- --- - --- - _-- --=-r=;_=======-W -- - --- - - - - - - - 0 =-===_---=____ -- _- 2 U Z ry, LU n } w WEST ELEVATION 206 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U- a w J Co < N BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS A201 0 M NO O N O J � Q N o Z~ DATE: 02-15-23 " w ( 2 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 �,w � LL C/) LL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER [4] ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS 2 1 6 10 1 �,. - 5 - 6 VINYL WINDOWS F7] METAL TRELLIS MAX. HEIGHT M 'i - ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ElMETAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS H GARAGE DOOR 1H HI Fpp] i HI LEVEL 4 aB [HIH FFOR OR THE FURTHER OR FORAND MATERIALIONNOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 (+301_311) o 00 LEVEL3 _ ❑ ❑ _ - ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ - 00 (+20'-211) ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ L EVE L 2 El (+10'-111) CD ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑❑ ❑❑ -------- -_- ----_�------4 - ='ss?sis-er es--orr-r=sari=rr=r-'asrvzr Sri=essa-:- -----------sea-- zv-. 73 LEVEL 1 ` o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 (+01_011) o 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 3 C6 z 0 I= a w J w Co 0 Z 2 1 6 1 5 0 J Co N T N MAX. HEIGHT a O Q 7 I KEY MAP a LEVEL 4 _ U o FOOTHILL BLVD. (+30 -3 ) a w = CD Co LEVEL 3 ❑❑ RR L11 EE ❑❑ ❑ ❑ — 00 +20'-211 CD ❑o ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ o❑ ❑o �.. _ _ _ _ Co o = LEVEL 2 ❑❑ HH ❑❑ LE ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ � r LEVEL 1 A _❑❑ — A0❑ pp z �i ■■ _s �■ ._r--�_. r 0-1 3 w EAST ELEVATION 406 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U- a a w J (h < N BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS A201 1 N O NO O N O J a N o Z~ DATE: 02-15-23 " � 2 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 ( w � LL LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS_ N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 MATERIAL / COLOR LEGEND STUCCO r2] FIBER CEMENT SIDING r3] STONE VENEER [4] ARCHITECTURAL TRIM [5] METAL RAILING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS 1 6 1 10 5 El VINYL WINDOWS F7] METAL TRELLIS ' ❑$ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT i El METAL AWNING WITH PERFORATED INFILL PANELS r GARAGE DOOR MAX. HEIGHT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE, REFER TO SHEET A4.0 LEVEL 4 - FOR THE COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD (+301_311) 0 LEVEL 3 ❑❑ (+201_211) o ❑❑ Co LEVEL 2 ❑❑ (+101-1 „) - ------:---- - -_- -- -------rv-_v - _------ LEVEL 1 o0 00 00 00 00 __ o0 00 = o0 0 = 00 00 00 (+0�_011) o =s - 0 WEST ELEVATION 5 C6 Z 0 I= Q w J w M Z Co J 6 10 2 4 5 1 N T N 0 MAX. HEIGHT Q I Co N KEY MAP Q ❑❑ 11E ❑❑ - C) LEVEL 4 U DO ❑❑ ❑❑1 _ (+301_311) FOOTHILL BLVD. ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ QD ❑❑ ❑❑ LEVEL 3CD CD ❑❑ �❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ �� ❑❑ ❑❑ (+20'-211) Co _ . o I�� = ❑❑ �❑ F LEVEL 2 > o - ---------- - < o0 00 00 00 0o a = o 00 00 LEVEL 1 LU _ _ o 6 5 > 0 %_ (+0 -0 ) Z 77r ry Q ds } w EAST ELEVATION 606 NORTH J J 0 8' 16' 32' 0 3/32"=1'-0" U- a w J Co < N BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS A2012 N N NO O N O J � Q N o Z~ DATE: 02-15-23 " w ( 2 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 w � L.L LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS _ N Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. J Relationships. ( 714) 639-9860 25'-0" 22 —0 35'-811 9,-8„ ol 44'-0" 9'-9 1/2" 1-018'-5" PATIO/ ��O ��'' ❑ - PATIO/ STOR. of BALCONY g DROOM ❑ 33'-0" o BALCONY I 8'-8"x6'-0" � 7'-8" BALCONY BEDRO M ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ 6'-0"x7'-6" ❑M El 04_ ❑ M M ❑ _ ❑ O ❑ ALCONY W.I.C. ,,_3„x8,_2., O E:lLIVING BEDR OM C4 L VIN BEDROOM W.I.C. L 00 ROOM p 11'_6"x12'0" 0 QQ ,p-0'x11'-6. ,,,8x„ o" co ao L VOION , '-s-x,s'-• � , '-,-x,4',• o WORK - LIVE W.I C. I 36"TUB ❑ N 24._6,,�,._,,, ,,._6,,�,._,,, RFF I _ 00 ENTRY 17 wloJ 00 o I CV I 36"TUB LQo FCIE Lo N conrsDINING BATH LC. DINING N BATH 1 ISFIXED LAND EN ROOM FIxeDISLAND ROOMBATH 0 BATH , W/D BATH ENTRY KITCHEN LJLJ KITCHEN °°F— I� KITCHEN ATS COATS` �,i DROP TRII'� � ,"TSB w�D ii REF P E RY ALB I � 100 ENT Y COATS L RFF LIVE/WORK UNIT: STUDIO WORK AREA: 745 SQ. FT. (60%) UNIT A1A: 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT A2: 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT AI 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT A4: 1 BR / 1 BA LIVE AREA: 495 SQ. FT. (40%) LIVABLE AREA: 680 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 759 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 792 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 753 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA: 1,240 SQ. FT. (100%) PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 59 SQ. FT. BALCONY AREA: 63 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 45 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 58 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 1 QUANTITY: 28 QUANTITY: 6 QUANTITY: 7 QUANTITY: 18 46'-11 " r 43'-0" 41'-10" 51'-9 1/2» BALCONY 7'-8„ 6_o.x,,_0., le Nk ❑ M o ❑ ❑ ❑ BEDROOM O ❑ 11'-0"x1 T- BALCONY O ❑ T-s"xs-o" ❑ BEDROOM ❑ _ BE ROOM BE DROOM D „� „''-0'x„�_6. BEDR OM L VIN 2'_3" ❑ L�I� 12._6"x,._6„ o'x BALCONY BALCONY s"x1s I� A'6"x7-0' 8-0 x7-0 4'x12'o/IN �71 N I N S' = W.I.C. I EDROO �9'' L VIN 00 O EDROO �9 L 00 o'x -10" � --- x ❑ 1 � W.I.C. 36"TUB 1 '-0"x12'S' o NIN W.I.0 N MEW N conrs W.I.C. DININ OOM ❑ N W.I.C. DIOOM BATH LINEN FIXED LINEN FIXED FIXED ISLAND GOAT BATH 36"TUB [AILINE L ISLAND _ ISLAND 3C'rU6 W I L P FIXED ISLAND W/D 3s'" u6 3s'" u6 ` KITCHEN BATH KITCHEN BATH KITCHEN BATH KITCHEN . 1 ENTRY I _ENTRY BATH S BATH m 41 COA WID �. . 4 cony WID J � 3s o" [77 -ENTRY 9 LJ OO ENT Y l�l l�l * REFIL I �'N N� I _ _ _ DB jft2m2j UNIT A5: 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT B1 : 2BR / 2BA UNIT B2: 2BR / 2BA UNIT B3: 2BR / 2BA LIVABLE AREA: 717 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 975 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 999 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 1114 SQ. FT. BALCONY AREA: 46 SQ. FT. BALCONY AREA: 43 SQ. FT. BALCONY AREA: 46 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 45 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 4 QUANTITY: 4 QUANTITY: 8 QUANTITY: 15 0 4' 8' 16' 24' 1/8"=1'-011 UNIT PLANS A300 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. 22'-0" 22'-0" 39'-6" 8'-63' 8'-9 1/2" 44'-0" ❑rr� ❑ ❑ .1_011 PATIO/ nn ❑ �I BALCONY BALCONY _1pLM-iIE8jIF13-1 w N N a� BEDROOM ❑ 8-9 xs-O g._o..xe._O„ BEDROOM BALCO Y 12'ox12'-o• qG r-o x1z'-o IVIN a s xa s 0o % o ❑ KITCHEN B DROOM I 8D „'-o'x,T-o' u FIXED ❑ ININ ❑ �I PATIO/ LIVING KITCHEN B DROOM (\//\f�� ISLAND I REF � s'0C 0" ROO BALCONY ROOM � W.I.C. - 8'gxlo'o• - 12 0" � ❑ W.I.C. DINING B DR o, REF FIXED m LIVING BEDRO M io ❑ io ISLAND ROOM r ROOM "'°x'Z'o' _I „'-a"x,4'-" I I REF 3'-sx12'-s DINING C° ❑ I rh r7 ROOM BATH ❑ BATH FIXED LID] W.I.C. z-o"xLj L / BATH Ic DO ISLAND KIT W.I.C. N DEN \\�/ BATH 36'TUB ISLAND W.I.C. W.I.C. `°' � -__ s DINING ' r LINEN _ __ BEDROOM DR( 36 TDE �� 14ATH wiD ROOM 11'-8"x,2'-4" ENTRY OATLi Li 1�3EDROO BATH DROP KITCHEN ENTRYLl!�L� y S1 BATH 3s"rug i BATH ENT E i 3s TUB FWD UDY ENTRY ENTRY F]MrJCOATS"-Q l LDROP �� I AM UNIT B4: 2BR / 2BA UNIT B5-TH: 2BR / 2.5BA / DEN UNIT B6: 2BR / 2BA UNIT BT 2BR / 2BA/ STUDY LIVABLE AREA: 1050 SQ. FT. LEVEL 1 AREA: 688 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 1160 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 1132 SQ. FT. BALCONY AREA: 74 SQ. FT. LEVEL 2 AREA: 628 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 72 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY AREA: 54 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 28 TOTAL LIVABLE AREA: 1316 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 6 QUANTITY: 15 BALCONY AREA: 53 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 13 57'-10" 01 39'-6" 9'-7 1/2" ❑ - PATIO 2 — — 9'-9"xs'-O" BEDROOM \ BALCONY PATIO 1 ir-0"x1V-a" o s•-o•xs-o KITCHEN BEDROOM ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ FIXED O ,ISLAND I ❑ O REF BEDROOM — J L VIN io'-a•x11-a BEDROO W.I.C. 11'-6"x14'-0• 00 - LIVING 11'-6•'x18'-'• ❑ ROOM r LOFT ,3-s"x,z-s° DINING N Do._s..x,o' N ROOM N ❑ BATH ' 1nO"xa'-2" BATH P7 W.I C. ?� 36"TDB BEDROOM BEDROOM ,FIXED ISLAND �' a „'-a"x,2'-4" ' " ',1-ax,2-4" BATH ENT INEN INEN co rs �,' � r r BATH KITCHEN NTRY BATH W.I.C. 01 36"TUB I ININ W.I.C. ROOM � r-s^x1oM w . El UNIT Cl : 3BR / 2BA UNIT C2: 3BR / 3BA/ LOFT LIVABLE AREA: 1399 SQ. FT. LEVEL 1 AREA: 1132 SQ. FT. PATIO 1 AREA: 45 SQ. FT. LEVEL 2 AREA: 485 SQ. FT. PATIO 2 AREA: 58 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVABLE AREA: 1617 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 2 BALCONY AREA: 54 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 4 0 4' 8' 16' 24' 1/8"=1'-011 UNIT PLANS A301 DATE: 02-15-23 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. 18'-4" 18'-0" 7'-7" 3,_0„ 7,_9„ Qom o z `,° �Q' � g STEEL POST Q w ^I a PAINTED m � _ _ wzw TO MATCH � v zU) o ' � n BUILDING COLOR ;� � Lij Q ^I � N � Z I Q U 4 CU. YD. � . YD. 00 C � °O N BY EDC — — IN BY EDC(� _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII,IIIII,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi J Q'-0" 9'_0» 9'_0" 9'_0» 7 00 of STANDARD CARPORT ELEVATIONS P 5'-10" 7 STEEL POST- PAINTED STEEL POST- PAINTED \ _ _ T 7 TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR ROOF ABOVE ROOF ABOVE N I / _ _ _�\ °° CURB CURB /4 CU. YD\� _ �/4 CU. YD\ �N BY EDCO l O E — \ BIN BY EDCO o �L'i J 4 U PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING o o STALL STALL o STALL STALL STALL STALL STALL STALL a 00 00 LLLJ� 8" 5'-7" 5'-10" 5'-7" 8" Q z LJ LJ J W 18' 4" z o � TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPICAL PLAN 00 9'-0" 9'-0" 9'-0" 9'-0" 00 •• 9'-0" 0# 9'-0" 910" 9'-0" 0# 9'-0" 9'-0" 00 •• DRIVE DRIVE WAY WAY STANDARD HANDICAP CARPORT PLAN STANDARD CARPORT PLAN PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR 9' 0 III. V , i How a!!�'i ifIiIIIIliiiil�Ilili y!!! CD PARKING CD!�� T.�iC.:.�i'�:.r:.�CC.�'�.'T�i�:.�IT� r// PARKING PARKING PARKING 00 00 FRONT VIEW LEFT VIEW BRICK MATERIAL TO MATCH STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING PLAN STANDARD PARKING PLAN BUILDINGS Ili III iIIIIlI IiiIiililsllillilsl !!! !Is sill!!! sIIIlIIIlilliisllil II III IIIIIII !Iillll!!!!!I!Ilil !!!!!i! !_i_iI_!!! IIllii!!ililllillii IIII I IIiI IIIII REAR VIEW RIGHT VIEW TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPICAL ELEVATIONS PARKING , CARPORT, & TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL A500 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. N.T.S. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. 1 9 1 1 2 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 1 A 8 5 D 10 B C D F 6 3 E G D A C 4 E G A 12 3 10 11 ID.LU kh Ll con Z 17T 11 FITN MS-4 I ICA VII NG MA�L VIE __j A ===- L11== — -_ Ell 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___ ^si :r===== .:r-�a�:r.;=ems= -=^= =z BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION © © 0 0Now- SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE SW7757 OUTERSPACE SW6251 LIGHT FRENCH GRAY SWO055 TRICORN BLACK SW6258 ROOKWOOD DRK BRWN SW2808 ❑F SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS BUNGLEHOUSE BLUE SWO048 INTERACTIVE CREAM SW61 13 - > - wl• t It h4 - ._ �� 1` ! —=-'air:--x...a -•-' _- 16/20 STUCCO 2 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 3 STONE VENEER - VINYL WINDOWS & DOORS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL RAILING WITH 141 ❑ ❑ ❑ W PERFORATED INFILL PANELS SAND FINISH SMOOTH TO MATCH PAINT CREATIVE MINES BLUESTONE WHITE SYSTEM TO MATCH PAINT SPECS SPECS C & D CRAFT CARVED RECTANGLE DARK BRONZE/BLACK TO MATCH PAINT SPEC C - - _p - I _ _ 10 1 . +Mr Sftns — — ARCHITECTURAL TRIMS 8 METAL TRELLIS W/ WOOD METAL AWNING W/ CONTEMPORARY INTERSTATE BRICK 2 LONG BRICK VENEER TO MATCH PAINT SPEC E LOOKING JOISTS ❑ ❑ ❑ PERFORATED INFILL PANELS FOAM TRIM Fl-11 IRONSTONE FRAMING TO MATCH PAINT TO MATCH PAINT SPEC C SPEC C MATERIAL BOARD A400 DATE: 1 1 -18-2022 FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. TABLE1 1 1 REQUIRED BUILD-TO ► ! FRONTAGE AREA Standard' Farm-Based Zones COMPLY TABLE 17.132.030-1 ALLOWED BUILDING ENTRANCE AND FACADE TYPES BY ZONE NE2 NG3 CE1 ME1 ME2 C01 CO2 CE2 Form-Based Zones COMPLY DENSITY AND INTENSITY(MAX.) 401100 Building Entrance Neighb. Neighb' Center 1 Mixed Mixed &rridor 1# Corridor 2 Center 2 Dwelling Units per Acre{Dulac}(min./max.) 018 0124 0130 18130 24142 24142' 36160 20150 in IV/ and Facade Type Section Estate 2 General 3 Zane(CE7) Employment Employment none(C01) Zone(CO2) Zone(CE2) subzone Zone[NG3] 1 Zone[ME1] 2 Zone[ME2] 17.132.050 Shopfront and 0.4/0.6 1.012.0 Small Front Yard and%� � Floor Area Ratio(FAR)(min./max.) 010.4 0.210.4 in 0.2/0.6 0.411.0 0.411.0 0,411.(' 0.6/1.5 0.210.4 in 17,132,040 S Gallery, Arcade Terrace, and subzone subzone Porch, Stoop Variations Recess Variations - Primary Build-to Line(max./min.) 40 ft.INA Shopfront and Gallery, ZONES PERMITTED 0 Y 5 ft./15 ft. 0 ft.110 ft. 5 ft.120 ft. 5 ft.115 ft. O ft./15 0 ft.115 ft. O ft./10 ft. Arcade, Terrace, and 17.132.050 1/ COMPLY 0 Secondary Build-to Line(max./min.) 30 ftINA 5 ft.115 ft. 0 ft.110 ft. 5 ft.120 ft. 5 ft.115 ft. 0 ft.115 f$ 0 ft.115 ft. 0 ft.11 o ft. Recessed Variations NE2 NG3 CE7 ME1 ME2 C01 CO2 CE2 I FRONTAGEBUILDING PLACEMENT WITHIN PRIVATE AREAS NA 65%of 80%of 70%of 75%of 80%of 85%of 90%of Forecourt 17.132.060 0 , S 0 , D VARIATIONS x 100 Min. Built Percentage of primary primary primary primary primary primary primary / Height Clear Top Primary Frontage Width frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage V 12 ft. 16 ft. width width width width width width width of Transom NA BuildingEntrance and Facade Type Allowed °1 Width of Shopfront Bay(s)(s) 10 ft. 25 ft. © 30%of 30%of 30%of 30%of 30%of 30%of 40%of � yp � p y x 100 Min. Built Percentage of secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary Transparency, _ 0 Secondary Frontage Width frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage frontage 70% 90% Y width width width width width width width Ground Floor 0 Depth 4 ft. - J 0 Ground Floor Residential Use {min.} 10 ft, 10 ft, 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 0Cy Setback from Curb 2 ft. 15ft. 17.132.040 Small Front ms -Ground Floor Non-Residential Use[min.} 12 ft, 12 ft. 12 ft. 12 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. � as Upper Floor Non-residential loft. Yard and Porch and Stoopa m Height, Clear, Bottom 8 ft 10 ft pp 9 ft. 9 ft. loft. 10 ft. 9 ft.. 9 ft. 9 ft. J © of Projection © Height {min.) Variations Residential Finish Floor Elevation above 0 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. _V/ Height, Clear 12 ft. 16 ft. Grade at Max.Build-to Line(min.) 36 in.max. � ZONES PERMITTED Depth, Facade to Non-residential Finish Floor Elevation 18 in. 18 in. 12 in. 12 in. ® 12 in. 12 in. COMPLY o Interior Column Face 12 ft. 16 ft. 0 above Grade at Max. Build-to Line(max.) 18 in. NE2 I NG3 I CE1 ME1 ME2 i� CO2 CE2 Q.0 ©Total Stories[max.]z 3 stories 3 stories 4 stories 5 stories 4 stories 5 stories no Setback from Curb 2 ft. 6 ft. • - • L M maximum MIN. MAX. If located within a community activity 5 stories 7 stories YARD 4 times 5 times node, fronting Foothill Blvd or Haven Column Height column column Ave, or as approved consistent with 0 Height, Wall at Frontage - 3 ft. width width chapter 17.138(Large Site Development) Height, Planter/Fence - 3 ft. 0 Length - 150 ft. If adjacent to a lower density residential 3 stories 3 stories: 4 stories Hei g zone Height, Elevated Yard - 3 ft. Distance Between 75 ft PARKING SETBACKS(M IN.) Access Points Surface Parking, 25 ft.from Grading on Front Yard 0.5% 5% g 30 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. '40 ft.- 40 ft. 50 ft. � © building c © Depth 8 ft - facade Ground Floor Above Grade U•° Max. 3 ft. higher or 19 18 in. a at Building Frontage lower than the adjacent ft.Surface Parking,Street Side 25 ft.from 10 ft. 10ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 R. building sidewalk or Public Open facade Clear distance to 2 ft' Average Grade Space, Walls may extend development site line an additional 2 ft. in c 0 Depth (not including stairs) 6 ft, height. Fence/railing e height per California ► 1 i . 1 ALLOWED BUILDING ■ L. Di Width 10 ft. - Building Cade (CBC). aM Form-Based Zones COMPLY > © Height, Clear 8 ft. 12 ft. 1/ Ln a Depth 16 ft Building Type Section NE2 NG3 CE1 ME1 ME2 Coe CE2 0 Depth (not including stairs) 4 ft, 8 ft. a 2 0 Depth, Entry Recession 6 in. 6 ft. j Width, Bay(s) 16 ft. 25 ft. Fou rplex 17.130.060.A s * i Attached Flex 17.130.060.8 * : © Width 4 ft. 8 ft. Main Street 17.130.060.0 0 0 0 * ! 0 Height, Above Grade 18 in. - Rowhouse 17.130.060.D 0 ! 0 40 Courtyard Building 17.130.050.E 40 * S 0 0 Multiplex 17.130.060,F 9 0 0 S 0 S Mid-Rise Building 17.130.060.E 0 0 0 40 High-Rise Building 17.130.060.H TABLE ! 1 1 ALLOWED OPEN ► ZONE Estate 17.130.060.1 � ZONES PERMITTED - Form-Based Zone COMPLY Extra Large House 17.130.060.J COMPLY NE2 N63 CE1 ME1 ME2 C01 CO2 CE2 Neighb. Mixed Mixed pen Space Neighb. Center 1 Corridor 1 Corridor 2 Center 2 POCKET PARK ST' ' ' Type Section Estate 2 General 3 Zone[CE1] Employment Employment one[C01] Zone(CO2) Zone[CE2] S Building Type Allowed Zone(NG3) 1 Zone(ME1) 2 zone(ME2) Size No min., max Town Square 17.134.040 40 ZONESBUILDING MASSINGCOMPLY Context Must be defined on one sides by a NE2 NG3 FTF] ME1 ME2 C01 CO2 CE2 COMPLY Neighborhood 17.134.050 street with sidewalks or a pasea. s Width Max. 400 ft Park DEVELOPMENT 0 Depth Max. 390 ft Neighborhood Access Must be directly accessible from all Min. 150 ft, Max. 400 ft IV/ Green 17.134.060 i 9 abutting rights-of-way and alleys. OPEN SPACE 0 Min. 150 ft, Max. 400 ft V Pocket Park 17.134.070 s S S S * 0 Landscape Must include landscaping measures such as BUILDING © Common Usable Min. 30 sq. ft. per unit, in no and Design planted areas, turf area, and ground cover. ' CEMENT Open Space, Area case more than 2,000 sq ft. Build-to-Line See Table 17.130.060-1 Common Usable OpenPas a 17.134.080 , 400 * S J May include amenities such as benches, chairs, Interior Side Yard Setback None 0 Space, Minimum Dimension Amenities tables, play structures, and drinking fountains. J (in any direction) Rear Yard Setback Min. 10 � ft Open Space Type Allowed BUILDING HEIGHT r To eaveltop of parapet Max. 80 ft Overall Max. 32 ft PROJECT COMPLIANCE A600 DATE: 02-15-23 ,FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED - USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2021 - 134 LEAP DEVELOPMENT AO ARCHITECTS ` Architecture. 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD . SUITE 122 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 Design. ( 714) 639-9860 Relationships. UTILITY NOTIFICATION LIST: OWNER/DEVELOPER: ELECTRICITY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC EDISON UTILITY (RCMU) 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 122 (800)655-4555 (909)919-2612 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PHONE: ( ) ___-____ (800)427-2200 (909)987-2591 APN 0207-211 -43 44 210 FREEWAY ! I SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MUNICIPAL METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT (909)593-7474 (626)969-7911 FOOTHILL BLVD. U PR JEC J N TIME WARNER/ADELPHIA FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS SITE DATA J¢ Z' zITEZ ~ N~ o0°Qv0 O w Ld EXISTING IMPERVIOUS ARE : 1,068 S.F. QCHARTER COMMUNICATION REFUSE BURTEC DISPOSAL Z w(888)892-2253 (877)908-1288 LLJ > >( ) - ( ) - 1 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 188,300 S.F. >a z D a a wN I------ --- VERIZON PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA: 192,475.6 S.F. ' I1� > w o (800)922-0204 Q Q W o > o II I I I ;I j I 1 i I Q[if m LQ I --- _ I j ARROW ROUTE OJ z Q rn A M H AP 0207-211 45 I RAW EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 03 o LL_8TH STREET IJJ a 07-21 -46 1 I I 1 13,860 CY CUT a 2 0 0 I 1 c, l BENCHMARK: > a Z .V \' 4�1 L I 50 ```� 1 i I 3,740 CY FILL 6TH STREET wLLJ U) Z `�' H=5 RETAINI 1 N O I I BM 10042 cn o I I I 4TH STREET 0 = 2 N 89° 0��W � 63.61' �'��' I ' i I LEGEND: 10 FREEWAY a i I O I I 1 ROUND HEAD BOLT IN CONC. CURB LOCATED AT THE c 0 � �� SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & HELLMAN AVENUE. INDICATES BOUNDARY LINE � I -- 6�-- Q ELEVATION=1206.623 INDICATES EXISTING CONTOUR VICINITY MAP J .VL�� -1200- INDICATES PROPOSED CONTOURh f2:25 _ •\`L p ' li i 41 I INDICATES PROPOSED CURB LINE NOT TO SCALE I - - ii ti --•-•-- INDICATES CUT FILL LINE EV V ...-... -... ... .... ... ° i��`l�'q�1Q� / CURB - - BASIS OF BEARINGS TC INDICATES TOP OF CU I ! I F� -0.5% F� 0.5% ° N c� FL INDICATES FLOWLINE I I go. 0.5% F UJ TAKEN FROM THE CENTERLINE OF VINEYARD AVENUE AS SHOWN ON TG INDICATES TOP OF GRATE `1 o ��`Lh '�`� it I EXIS & GUTTER x� PARCEL MAP NO. 2829, PMB 24/76. TRW INDICATES TOP OF RETAINING WALL � h`l, w ! G1 I w TF INDICATES TOP OF FOOTING N I F1 �I BEING: N 00'13'40" E FG INDICATES FINISH GRADE � SCO SMH > ° 1 I SURFACEFS INDICATES FINISH 8 119.93 2.0 (XXX) INDICATES EXISTING ELEVATION ATION 1 0 INV. 121$.1 WEST I I i \ i �� 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 2 .1 26.1 26.1 .1 26.1 26.1 6.1 26.1 26. it iM 121 H LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ® INDICATES HANDICAP STALL I + I \w ) A PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10 OF CUCAMONGA EV INDICATES ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING 45% /- I I VINEYARD TRACT AS SHOWN IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 44, I + w . 2 0% RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. G I NEER \ j o / \ N N JI I I O RD I I I hh 1 �ooZ r\j I n�Q vP N'n CD 00 U) o it � o N co W > U I ~2.0% c6 � 11 1 li � Iv d <V � `" `" 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 ° ii i o I J I YAPN 0207-211 -4200 I I --- u 1 1 -EVSTING H f w c� II i 2 ------------- --- ------ -- ------ - -- z j I 'il / I , � 2.0%� ii I I �1 \C� 1-1214.87 V. -- - I `" N n 1�`L`° IOQ V. NORTH & ------ ' I - ---- - I Q i ��' u� ------------- - - EXISTING 8 WATER LIN - �1 �� I EXISTIN END CURB & GUTTER I 1 I P 1226.0 I N �- -- - - ---------------------------------------------- -- LmnU '° ' N - ----- -------------------------co . i � ,� fag`• I o - - �----------------------------- --�-�---------------- --------------------iI ----------- ' 2 o' F=1226.67 �, EXISTING 8„ SEWER LINE C Q PE=1226.0 1I I Z -0CD FF=1226.67 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT bN --- ------------ --------- 2 -�I�-------- ---------- M ---- ----------------- -------------------® ---- N 90'00'00" E 289.73' C I �GGj> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ - - - 5� m M w r m O w N N ... .. ... .. ... I ... ' ... ... � _ b 1-1 o I .. _ i ^ i 111 w EV EV EV I EV EV EV ^�� - (12 Z ca r - ca Ln co O P.I m 1 O 0 0 U o i m + ::::::::::::..:ti I I Q I s F �. ti �, o m ti .� - m co L.3 I I Aq- o ! / 1 N '♦ N 2.0% N V� '♦ a w m b �~ ` '♦ �� `G o ° o rj 0 'a Hill ; IP � o L0 CD 1 Q _.. _ cd I / PE 1226.0 C �. �, W `� o �2.°% N FF=1226.67 r F �.`�`� w,� .�� `' w Z10.7' _ --------- PE 1226 2 �°` F� I �� J �, °` o FF=1226.87 �J ; I � o%- __ CD tK C, '' 22.7 22.7 22.7 22.7 22 2.7 22.7 22.7 22.7 I 1. ,��,gyp. i I ,��' / `��Gv `y`L'�F ` .l r n�� ♦ ,1 �`ti, v G 5.0% �`ti��1. % ° N N / i 1�ti h1� O / I � � �� Olr � i APN 02 7 - I `l^� Q �`L �,`O 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 J ! l 1� ' I 1.0% p G F� �? P =1223.0 ° 2.0% 2.4% '�"�v� 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 / % /" `� I o I N00 j N 2.0% N ♦ ii // ♦ // 10.4 N N mil' N ILd LQ Q I j N 1.0% N ♦ � 122°3.3 TG ^ ,r, ��' N I w i A I ''�.._ .�' 1216.97 INV. c, ° N �, ' _ N �L F > 10.2' < �, �o ' ' > ' 1.0%," ``' I I I I N N •� ^ ^^�• 5 ., �` 2.7% N N 2.8% ;! N 2.0% N o I ��' ` I N N % ! '♦�'�.�' I w % %' r j rl) % % Lu i, N n cv 1.0% ci z ¢ ¢ N w I I • N 11 l 1 /1 ! N N A�' Q U O 2 o ♦• � rrj I I ! ` ♦. %' ° �`L��`L 0 04 N o l: \1 / \1 / l.._.._.. N N U Q I I 1 1 1 1 ♦� N N j/ Z ! I , ♦ ! ,r; � - - • © 3. 0 ° �p + 1 ' 1 :/1 F E IMPROVEMENTS 1 j I ; i ' ♦ i N N ; n c3 , 11 . I 0 Y OTHERS) j ILL. CNI I PE=1223.0 _ N N 1 _ Q I f + (- � ��; PE=1222.2 1 1 .2 U O `' c�' ♦ N , N FF=1223.67 1 1 / 1 ,�.._..r..� n I� I � 2 .°° > o �` FF=1222.87 N 7ccl p N F 1222.87 �, Q j '�,� , �`L ;• \-.._.._.._.._.._ _/ ,r, / ° N ; Div � ♦ N O � C� � /n1 ♦♦ �� z N F 1.o% N ; - �' �" i �,y 1 % 1\ ; ♦''♦ O Ij �� 1/ 4% �G ; - n' O C14N ' / \I i \I ; `lam N '♦ Q I �. ��F n tip'�Q5 21.5 1.5 ;• `V \ I II II I `L�'♦��`,L M - . 21.5 21 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21 21.5 21.50 . �2 22.7 22.7 N NN 20.3 0.1 19.9 \ J J OG % N 0% ^ U % I N I N . v 2. � / W M v, nl _ \ 3 i I / ' r I 0.7 I "' I J 1 F�211.1 21.1r2l.1 21.1 1 21.1 21.1 t=21. 21.1 2 21.1 20I.QO .3 20.1 19.9 19.7 19.5 J ` I k�j _ �_a_._.._.= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . off ..}�...��. sel I i I f �G c� C° \ I '♦`L c./ H "� �`L`� I I o �� N �� ' O III z W g c NOTE:. W p I m m I ` V 0 0, N •• 1 � "'-"-"-"-"-" � � N •� - 0 METAL VEICLE GATE TO PARCEL TO THE EAST � W o z 0000p IN '� o' I 0 1219 F I �`L �°�' �`L ''. �• �� °�' �°�� , WILL BE REMOVED WHEN THE PARKING LOT _.._.. _.. T.. .._.. .._.. .._._ _.._._.._._.._. _.._. _ ._.._.-..-. _.._.. ..- - - - - 1 - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - �`ti. �♦ ° I I '�� 0.5%19 ��'15 '�� 0.5% �� TO THE EAST IS COMPLETE. L� w ....... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _.._.. _ _ .. .. .. .. .. - --- _-- o it - •� F� w i EV EV 9 1 - _ V EV L.L ° 1 � � -- ' --- `1' I �\ �'\ X�_lz ��p• \ o p� 00 <c5 1 '� o ('21 3 G ' I I ------ - ---- 4 -- ------- ILu -- ---- --- - ---- - ------ --------- -- ---- ----- N ------ -- I _- - ------------- ---------------- --- ------------------------------------------ - ---- y -----, o �� N 89°52'3 " W 5.05' tit �� p ,`�� o -- "�� O -- -- - --__ (ISTING BLOCK WALL H= Nj o _ 7' RETAINING WALL l ��,�°` L ---_ r`L - j H= R NIN WA 1ti '� �, o RETAIINI WALL E_a_:�� I I - I I v ! I I - I ___ APN 0 0 - I ; ------------------------------------------- --------------------- ---- N 0 ocu GRAPHIC SCALE w o mcu I i 20 0 10 20 40 80 c_„ CL o 0 CD cu SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTIONS- SHEET NO. - o I i (IN FEET) 1 INCH= 20 FT. c CD ! a SITE SITE 1 SITE ••. ->-.,--��• !� P/L PROPOSED SITE PL COMBO '��-.., � i PROPOSED U BLOCK WALL BUILDING t11 J _ II � I , PROPOSED COMBO J N o P L PROPOSED EXIST. CHAIN I , 00 P L i ; BUILDING I o LINK FENCE � PL i I BLOCK WALL F UJ 6' TO BE REMOVED-,, PROPOSED; ! Q io BUILDING PROPOSED COMBO 1232 I , 16.00 I I , o, LLI U ! BLOCK WALL EXISTING FIG ,; I i 30' I I `D '` o o PAVEMENT 6 i ! EXIST. CHAIN EXISTING CHAIN I I 1222.9 I 6' 4' w v ! _ TU ULAR STEEL I I FF i o EXISTING CHAIN m N I 1225.1 7\mil\T\T J i i 2�7 LINK FENCE LINK FENCE I �I LINK FENCE ��, Q v EXISTING FENCE t TC PROPOSED CURB �\ �\ �\ 2:1 SLOPE IF I I TO BE REMOVED 1 I I Z Z rn /\/\/\/ a I I � 2.34 3 15.50 5 4 I •• I• : p., J - Q o PROPOSED PAVEMENT /\//\//\/ �:..� NECESSARY I I 1227 \ \ \ \ t42 + I ! ! - ' \\ \\ \\ 1226.3 ; I 8 TIC EX. CURB & PROPOSED PARKING 1226.6 PROPOSED I 1226.87 /\/\/\/\/\ /\j,: 1.97' LLI ' RET. WALL' \ ' \�'\ TC 1226.7 i 5' GUTTER V-GUTTER T� CURB I I FF /\/\/\/\/ /\/\ z w // // // ///�//' \�/\\j FF SIDEWALK AST. PAVEMENT ;: \ \` \` - \�\ /\//\\ PAVEMENT w w N z 1223 \/\/\/\/\/\ / / PROPOSED I i :7 .. •. �i / �i r r \ \ / / \/\/\. o FG \/\\/\\/�\/ \j/ \\ \ CURB c_ _I ��\ \ . .\; -� -�=-T-- \//\/ PROPOSED \....' . l � ,- ,- T� p _ _ \//\//�\/ / :• •;•/\//�// • ----- /\/\ \/\/\I- 7 T �T�j \\/ \\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/�\/\\/\\//\\ PROPOSE, \ / . // l\� o I- m �/ /'SIDEWALK/ // SIDEWALK \/:•. :: \ \\.\\.� FLOOD CONTROL \/�//�❑//\//�/�/. /// /%/ ,�\ \ \�r� " \\ \\,�\\�� \�\\ �,\\\ \\ \\� � /\ 1220 0 0 FENCE - \ \r NOTE:/\/\/\ - - NOTE: FS 10 /\/\\j\\ \\��\\�/�/� FG-0.5 =TF (TYP) FG-0.5 =TF (TYP) FIG -TF (TYP) FG-0.5 =TF (TYP) LU G WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE A NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE B EAST PROPERTY LINE C NORTH PROPERTY LINE D EAST PROPERTY LINE J TRAIL \ // » » SCALE: H: 1 =5 SCALE: H: 1 =5 1 SCALE: H: 1 =5 1 SCALE: H: 1 =5 1 SCALE: H: 1 =5 V: 1"=5' V: 1"=5' V: 1"=5' V: 1"=5' V: 1"=5' 1219.0 / //\//\\//%\//\\/�\ . SEE SHEET 1 FOR SECTION LOCATIONS_ 8 4 © LEGEND: 210FREEWAY PROPOSED PL "yEfNNINOWA11 I SITE STATISTICS: FOOTHILLBLVD. SITE 42" HEIGHT, BLACK NGINRETAINING WITH EER GROSS ET AREA: 4.43 AC DRAINAGE AREA (DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA) I Pv P D ti� � DA-1 DMA-1 : PROJEC DECORATIVE TUBE � I R ITE STEEL FENCE ON TOP ! _o= ��' ti° 1 c DISTURBED AREA: 100% , J PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 80% w Z t� oFD Q _ i �"0 DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA BOUNDARY a > W 'a 'a ¢ r r W Z w PROPOSED ly, EXISTING N ' " ry N -D.sz o.5z ryry o.5x , �¶N 0 DRAIN INLET WITH FLOGARD INSERT FILTER a w o a a_ CURB �� U 6 t3.5 ! GARAGE o 02 o c' o ,tis 9 1 15 13 14 I I e a - -- PROPOSED ONSITE STORM DRAIN m a J a1221 .2 0 I k� O ti 1 f X _ _ DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION o a ARROW ROUTE J w o TC 226 I- H rn 26.1 28.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 6. zs., A. N1 NON-STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL Z / 8TH STREET Vl J 1. _ _ BMP IDENTIFIER a :• \ \ r-T S 193 45X --zO% u 1 3 I !�r S1 STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL 6TH STREET o p II r/ / / r 1 ' 7 10 I ek BMP IDENTIFIER 4TH STREET b m I �\ \ \ �� I N g SD-1 CASOA BMP IDENTIFIER O Z \ /\\�\ F 'REMOVE BLOCK WALL 13 = 10FREEINAY _ �, /\�� '. ;REMOVE IF POSSIBLE s \/ (� +I 'OR ELSE FOAM FILL GAF 10 a EX. CONTOUR (MINOR) a W CL U- NOTE: -z0% 25.5 26.5 Z6.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26S 26.5 26.5 gas 25.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 o .: "1P EX. CONTOUR (MAJOR) VICINITY MAP > w a z FG-0.5'=TF (TYP) / 9 11 220 PROP. CONTOUR W t- \ -205 ! NOT TO SCALE 0 x= E } m w 00 %�IlI�_ TJ/ / In titi I w PE=1226.0 O 1 D STMG END OF Cl I a O 1 \\ � 1214 FF=122667 --1--- -------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------- \ 1-� •n rn A -- -------------------�- 13 PE=1226.0 6 22 I LLl /// / FG w In m 1 3 FF=1226.67 1 �� c I J M t° N ____ ...... EDGE OF PAVEMENT---- t"_ J . 2 E SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE ° M Co APN# 020�-211-43 44 W aLn ❑ G m W -1 e ! 7"T - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1 SCALE: H: 1"=5' ,rytio f -2.0% DA-1 (DM -A) ce '`` ti�5 .` w n ,tiff , 4.43 AC m �,.D% L a cCOn cLO O Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance I� = � 2 M PE=1226.D I I =° ED CO -z FF=1226.67 ` titi° PE=1216.2 o CO FF=1226.87 O❑ F` G'? � ryti3 3 PROPOSED PL coIll 1In 4 oz SDI- - °' g to Reponsib minimum 1 4 4E5 227 22.7 227 22.7 227 227 227 2z7 13 Inspection/ Maintenance RETAINING WITH a'll ' m b �YNEER 42 HEIGHT, BLACK ,--'" W ryry,� n 0 .� �� BMP le Frequency of �N o by SITE DECORATIVE TUBE i j r l e Activities Required r�.°g ❑ , 1 �' " �� 22.3 .3 223 zz3 22•3 Party(s) Activities � � � �4 STEEL FENCE ON TOP t.oX ` 1 PE=1223.0 2.0% - 2.a - - n > FF=1223.67 r LL PROPOSED > > 10 � �ZD%�� Z� � lmmrdiateJy � do Z 6 I EXISTING Inspect Pacific Corrugated Pipe System through the access/inspection o ��e CURB ! BUILDING ®� ,~ -5% `� manholes to determine the depth of sediment. Fallow local and OSHA after ��lsls3� ��P 1221 .5 ,` t 19.8 sti Yz� j OO 9_ 1, 2.6z- -z°z construction TC :. r J ` 1 BMP Maintenance - / \\ \-J (� 10 HOA rules for a confined space entry. / ! N 13 13 -49x 1 3 N Infitration Chamber Thereafter Bi l � 1etVac maintenenace is recommended if sediment accumulation depth \ System (N4) annual PE=1223.0 13 ` exceed 3 PE=1222.2 ti PE=1222.2 5 n FF=12M.67 14 FF=1222.67 ° inspection Z � I i FF=1222.87 � � � � 10 � NOTE: ' •.; k� EXISTING BLOCK WALL I ryk. 2,.5 z1.s 13 O w • - REMOVE IF POSSIBLE, OR ELSE FOAM FILL GAP �� _ FG-0.5 =TF (TYP) ( ` -}- -� 21-5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 I 22.7 22.7 22.7 n _ °� 20.3 20.1 19.9 m L0 -- 1 CL -zox 1 3 5 s a w \❑:./. \ r. 1rL14 /�//�//• //\/�\\//\ N \ \ \ $ :N k� r r 7❑ 10 - �0z n 207 zo.3 FIG A minimum of Q m M � GG N ZZ7 Z V • N 1 '�1h N it C µ M J -�� N HOA once every two s NU :r 2a• cP 1�R`P 20x 1 1 Catch basin inspection Catch basins and installled insertfiletrs will be inspected a minimum of a F SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE L _� / ?i 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21-1 "'Ll 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 '.I 21.1 21.1 21.1 ` 20.3 20.3 20.3 3'3% 20.7 19.9 19.7 19.5 months during " SCALE ¢ » � - 4` ,220 220� program (N14) once every three months during the dry season. th 9 1 H: 1 !5 Q --- ----------- g *' - FOR BYPASS OVERFLOW` s 11 o ` the rainy V: 1 =5 W j I RCP l 7 I y ` °' 220 , 219 . 219 S 1 4 I ��% season. L� (n U - - - D.5% ti 2� zZ � 10 I� --------- -Ile, � 10 -6 ETAINI l ® Place at grate Ll I - - Provide storm drain HOA ll BLOCK WALL �,� �' ,c^0 q ,�° 6 Signs will be laced above storm drain inlets to "warn the public of installation and o -5'R cWALL l(-_ ti //% y� system stencilling and g P P W z Y STORMTECH INFILTRATION CHAMBER SYSTEM 2 9 prohibitions against waste disposal inspect Once a ,,J U LATITUDE&LONGITUDE signage(S1) Q _ (MC-7200) WQMP BMP(BELOW GROUND SYSTEM FOOTCAPACITYPRINT 53,55 GF ■ ALLARD ENGINEERINGCN -STORMTECH SYSTEM} SYSTEM FOOT PRINT 3,553 SF � �r � Cn � U N z 34.10498'N, -117.61331'w civil en erin land curve land _ Q g 9 Pn9 Use efficient irrigation Q In conjunlctivn with routine landscaping maintenance activities, inspect systems & landscape HOA irrigation for signs of leaks, overspray and repair or adjust accordingly. A minimum of W o z WQMP Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate design, water BMP LIST: Note: This form shall be submitted to the Environmental Programs Division of the Engineering Services Department prior to a Adjust system cycle to accommodate seasonal fluctuations in water once every two U conservation, Smart Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Official demand and temperatures, Ensure use of native or drought weeks. 1 EDUCATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS (N1) o Q controllers, and source w z Y 2 sroRMTECH Mc-7210 INFILTRATION CHAMBER SYSTEM tolerant/non-invasive plant species to minimize water consumption. � Q Q w 0 3 TRAINING/EDUCATION PROGRAM (N12) control. (S4) o � o ' ` Z 4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BMP (N3) Project Name Foothill and Vineyard Mixed Use Multi-family Residential Q V 0 5 COMMON AREA CATCH BASIN INSPECTION (N14) � Q 6 LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLANNING (SD-10) (N3) Protect slopes and HOA Avoid disturbance of existing westerly channel, Inspectfmaintain the A minimum of O � J v If a residential project provide the following information: J 7 ROOF RUNOFF CONTROLS AND DISCHARGE TO PERVIOUS AREAS (SD-11) channels and provide retention and detention basins, culvert and outlet pipes & energy once every Q = U 8 EFFICIENT IRRIGATION (S4) Tract No. APN:0207-211-43.44 v, 9 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILLING & SIGNAGE (S1) energy dissipation. (S6) dissipation. month. 1 10 TRASH STORAGE AREAS (SD-32) DRC 2022-00189-Serafin Maranan z 11 DRAIN INLET FILTER INSERT- FLOGARD INSERT FILTER MODEL#FGOP-2436FGO O w M Z Z OR APPROVED EQUAL < \ / O Grading PMT L I c.) 12 BMP MAINTENANCE (N4) A minimum of W 13 LITTER/DEBRIS CONTROL PROGRAM (TC-11) Ins ectfilter medium Ouches filter liner, gaskets, frame and mounting once ever two O C 1 NI WQMP PMT HOA p p , g g Y G 2 o 14 STREET/DRIVEWAY SWEEPING/VACUUMING (N15) CO U ` �I Phase Lots Catch Basin Filter Insert bracket for damage & defect, vacuum filterr insert liner priorty, during months during �_ Q and following the rainy season. the rainy m � � 3 0 � Z season. _ O N X N J 1 DRAINAGE AREA AREA (AC) PROPOSED DESIGN CAPTURE PROVIDED VOL. If anon-residential project provide the following information W l o W i C U BMP VOL. (CF) CF DRC N Ld Z DA-1 (DMA-1) 4.43 STORMTECH MC-7200 14,905 CF 15,175 CF Grading PMT W V w WQMP PMT BMP MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE w TOTAL AREA 4.43 ACRES z F O 0 w DCV ACHEIVED WITH PROPOSED BMP: 101.8% ^ ^ 3 L.L L.L w T U Q N I HERBY CERTIFY THAT TH E NECESSARY STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ��UJ� W o STRUCTURAL STORM WATER TREATMENT DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND ARE E VJ J o FUNCTIONAL TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE DATE BELOW. o y V a V O N Print Name Raymond J.Allard, P.E i CD 0 N Signature Date o `` o GRAPHIC SCALE w Z o cil o Wet Seal V) o Z 30 0 15 30 60 120 = it C> o v i � (V ,�; SHEET N0. - .... o (IN FEET) Ll v ~o ,INCH=30 FT. 1 1 a OF 0 ~ U O a2 L 7> Z N v Ll p m =3 = CD a Ln --- AIL p v J NOTE: THIS IS PRELIMINARY WQMP EXHIBIT SHEET NO. C:) C2 v c a� L. 210 FREEWAY FOOTHILL BLVD. PR JEC J colw ITE N o • C01 Z w w w � 00 w w Q z o APN 0208-101 -24 N w Q z z J w Q IL col m o J m 5 U II m > _ < J CT APN APN u10$-101 -25 Q m APN 0207-1 02-27 ARROW ROUTE O • - �� ■■- - - - - 0207-102-L w 8TH STREET � m APN020763107 z Q ` 6TH STREET wZ I ' 4col ` 4TH STREET 0 >_ = = � ' Z ` 10 FREEWAY c 0 o � VICINITY MAP Lu col col GO , , NOT TO SCALE col col APN 020t -721 -21 Q� o APN APN APN0 MAL �P 0207-102-22 0207-102-23 0207-102-24 col - Q� APN 0208-101 -23 c 1 4t col I APN 0208-101 -2 ---- _ ♦ ENGINEER b i o2P'v PRE N 0404 O - � O — co o , Q co � r FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Lij �� 'I z x _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �I w 1 S 103 N , amp - ---- Ln - - - - - -- - - - - - z a M I Lu w cd m a ,n m 1 M col Zj w N APN 0207-211 -46 W z b U3 • _ > F_ m 6 0� p co 0 Ln 1 APN 0207-211 -43 Q m Q N 89'47'06" W 263.61' m 1 I LEGEND: a o 1 p� PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY I 660 RADIUS BOUNDARY 1 Q w CORRIDOR 1 ZONE N 90'00'00" W 289.73' � 1 col col o APN 0208-193-80 1 MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL > M 1 W 1 APN V. LOW RESIDENTIAL APN Nut-201 -25 1 I N020721144_ _ 660 colWCol 61 1 I ocol c1li APN 0207-211 -43 0 C) - I o , 3 0' APN 0208-193-86 I II Q U IY Aloft col 6 6 0 N 89'52'30" W 585.05' I I LLJ nl I s• 53 w Z Y w _< w Q U � 2 1 Aft ib Q Z J y J w , Q U 7 Z *APN 0207 671 -29 Q 0 M Q 0 APN 0208-182-02 w Q t � F Z 0 o _ Z o _ z O O Z C0 Q ♦ APN 0207-211 -06 — w Q Q z Alf U Q — cn N ~ o J U APN 0207 201 36 ♦ — Q z cn Q w _ ♦ ' o z w - w > w J J W — LLJ z APN 0208-182-05 — Q J - - ♦ U) zQ) 2 T I I I N -300 toW C y - ' go - O L.L c O Nm m m m U CN O APN 0207-194-55 APN 0207-211 -24 APN 0208-982-58 APN 0208-982-57 J GRAPHIC SCALE w Z 80 0 40 80 160 320 w o 00 _ [ifo a N � � o a J S i Q (IN FEET) SHEET N0. 0 1 INCH= 80 FT. 210 FREEWAY , I OWNERMEVELOPER. FOOTHILL BLVD. LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC PR JEC N J I I 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 122 ITE J N 0 I I SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Z . — 00 o Li LU PHONE: ---) ---- � w w Q z---- fl I ; I I Iil I I I w Z Z w w z I I 0 a a a Q a LLB N U I J APN 0207-211 -43, 44 � Z Q ,I � Q Q 8 � m moo t I�I�r1I a OF--- ARROW ROUTE Ed ra, QMATERIAL NOTE. J a3 0 [ifM H 8TH STREET w O PERIMETER WALL WILL BE PRECISION BLOCK COOL GREY COLOR 6TH STREET > <O I ww 4T N p Z0 I �I LEGEND: 10 FREEWAY � 0�, � I Q � N 6 I I� I CMU FREESTANDING/RETAINING WALL W/ROLLED VICINITY MAP J STUCCO CAP COLOR TO BE: NATURAL GRAY SLUMP '12ii I BURNISHED FINISH a NOT TO SCALE n 5' HEIGHT FRAMELESS GLASS POOL ENCLOSURE & GATES - PER CODE _ 5' HEIGHT POURED-IN-PLACE FREESTANDING WALL I W/ FLAT CAP & BOARDFORM FINISH 36" HEIGHT POURED-IN-PLACE FREESTANDING / WALL W FLAT CAP & BOARDFORM FINISH I I I 42" HEIGHT DECORATIVE METAL TOT-LOT FENCE & - I I - - 1 NEE I GATE COLOR TO BE BLACK LNG R b� ° N ado o II I I I CMU FREESTANDING RETAINING WALL W ROLLED ► I I I / / �` w � M I STUCCO CAP COLOR TO BE: NATURAL GRAY - S Iv ��o� Z° I ( ( I o i I B RNI�Sh�ED INISH RETA�ING - 42" HEIGHT, BLA ' i I DE TUBE STE L FENCE ON TOP I ( I u ` .... I � I i 31S1�3� I I II II ------ ------------- --- -----ui Ln C� / I — I I U z I I ; ; - i \i I Z L6 76 - __�- � m Q m I ' j I/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ; .. ... ... .. ... ... - I I( @ Z Ln . r.I ;i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _ 1 � , ... N / 1 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - ------- m C \ \ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ------- W c -- C M w a m � I � Il lI O /\ �J �� m cn i ri l l i j 4 ,\�, �,• �, M2Z r '�j '� %/ j IIII IIIII(IIIIIIIII IIIIIIII \� ° O �° o o ° o �° o I � ( I �`L 4jO / , IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII O O � .; N I / I ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I ( / ' I • IIIIIII'�'I"'i"' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I _ ®>_11oAe 4� ' ;- I I ( APN 02 7 - ` g /,0 J I Z:3 Q I I I L w I w I I V I cn U <� I I / `L 1 r I I ■ / w Lij o cn o cU I Z I � 0 U I II I I I/ I l 1 / 1 I ,��, .moo,• l ) O I n I i i i i I \ U J 0 O I I U ° o I I it I L 7 I = I 1 / Y M zQ I 1 , W 3 IJ U I 1 , I I IJIL Q O N I N W O I w W fn - z I - U LLJ Lu- --- --------- ---- -- I I -- -------T -- -------- _-ram--- IL J I � o I I I a I GRAPHIC SCALE w o m w I ; 20 0 10 20 40 80 �_„ o � I J SHEET NO. o I i ( IN FEET) 1 INCH= 20 FT. o , 4 ai CL ASPHALT PAVING PER CIVIL MIN. BUFFER SCREEN PLANT PALETTE I I ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR I 1 ° NATURAL GRAY PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE W/ I I I Sunset Zone 18 48" I I / p TOPCAST FINISH, TYP. Symbol Botanical Name Common Name WUCOLS I HT. i� � I ADJACENT SHRUB PLANTING, TYR I I DECORATIVE MONUMENT SIGNAGE TREES REGION 4 I I n GAS STATION I Q —_ PARKING LOT STRIPING PER I SPEED TABLE W/ ENHANCED VEHICULAR PROPERTY LINE, TYP. CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR I PRECAST PAVER'S & ENHANCED CONCRETE Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Low I P 001 0 BANDS PER CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANS DECIDUOUS FLOWERING ACCENT TREE - Flowering Accent Tree 8 1 -- PR F„ I , CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS, W/ DECORATIVE _ POCKET PARK Lagerstroemia I. 'Whit X Double Dynamite Crape Myrtle Low I I ° FLEXIBLE LAWN AREA METAL TREE GRATE Flowering Accent Tree CONCRETE WALL EXISTING PARKING LOT & LANDSCA PING TO -' Magnolia 'D.D. Blanchard' D.D. Blanchard Southern Magnolia Mod • ACCENT PALM TREES r REMAIN - PROTECT IN PLACE, TYRParking LogEvergreen Shade FLEXIBLE OUTDOOR LAWN GAMES I • ENHANCED BORDER PLANTING FIRE LIFE SAFETY LADDER CLEARANCE Olea e. 'Wilsonii" Wilson Fruitless Olive Mod ABSTRACT PUBLIC ART PIECE ZONE APPROVED PER CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MARSHALL, TYP. Pistacia c. 'Keith Davey Keith Davey Chinese Pistache Mod Parking Lot Deciduous Tree I Podocarpus e. 'Monmal' Icee Blue Yellow-wood Mod TI Perimeter Accent Tree , - ADJACENT �C —►= j COMMERCIAL I PALMS I w PROPOSED BUILDING Ill — _ DEVELOPMENT ° ' F I ^� - C 3-�/I+ STORY - - Ili I Phoenix d. 'Medjol' Medjol Date Palm Low Accent Palm �O ,-, L -- I Washingtonia robusta hybrid Mexican Fan Palm Low > - - - - - I Accent Palm - � I Symbol Botanical Name Common Name WUCOLS T PROPERTY LINE PERIMETER SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVERS Al Achilles m. 'Paprika' Paprika Common Yarrow Low Aeonium a. 'Tip Top' Tip Top Aeonium Low Agave'BlueGlow' Blue Glow Agave Low ( z Aloe strata Coral Aloe Low Z I Bougainvillea'California Gold' California Gold Bougainveillea Low c - Calandrinia s. 'Shining Pink' Shining Pink Rock Purslane Low O ADJACENT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Callistemon v Little John' Dwarf Bottlebrush Low I c Carex divulsa Berkeley Sedge Low i I I I Dianella T. Variegata' Variegated Flax Lily Low III' °� °� © ' N I i o PROPOSED BUILDING 3 0 SHOWN FOR MASTER PLAN ADJACENT I Euphorbiarigida Gopher Plant Low PUBLIC TRAIL R SEE SHEET L-2 FOR PASEO & PURPOSE ONLY I Furcraeaf. Variegata' Variegated False Agave Low SYSTEM 3-4 STORY !� COURTYARD ENLARGEMENTS - "� r � N.A.P. I Grevillea ScarleTSprite' Scarlet Sprite Grevillea Low Hesperaloe p. Yellow' Yellow Yucca Low Juncus p. 'Elk Blue' California Gray Rush Low i Lantana c. 'Radiation' Radiation Bush Lantana Low 11 I Muhlenbergia dubia Pine Mulhy Low - B7 / (_ J '- I Penstemon h. 'Margarita Bop' Margarita Foothill Penstemon Low I �� , Rosmarinus o. 'Hunln ion Carpet Huntington Ton Carpet Rosemary Low I Salvia L 'Santa Barbara' Santa Barbara Bush Sage Low Senecio mandraliscae Blue Chalksticks Low Ir < r - ❑ PERIMETER SCREEN SHRUBS&VINES Arbutus u. 'Compacts' Dwarf Strawberry Tree Low Al - I i CLI w I Dodo naea v. 'Purpurea' Hopseed Bush Mod = n 1�, O LigusTrum I. 'Texanum' Texas Privet Mod I A 4 I - I \ I \ - " ❑ Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy Mod ' A3 63 -- V I 11 - i Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat's Claw Vine Low I; 1 �1 I - Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine Mod PROPOSED BUILDING 2 �. - I ` ` I l�1 F_ - - - - -- - - -- L - -- SPECIAL LANDSCAPE NOTES(SECTION 17.56.0501: I : 3-4 STORY -"- -- d I / -- ` I STREET AND PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S MASTER LIST OF STREET I TREES AND PARKING LOT TREES.A MINIMUM OF 30%OF THE STREET TREES AND PARKING LOT TREES, RESPECTIVELY, SHALL BE AN EVERGREEN SPECIES. I " 1 e¢c _ F- TREES PLANTED WITHIN TEN FEET OF A STREET, SIDEWALK, PAVED TRAIL, OR WALKWAY SHALL BE A I DEEP ROOTED SPECIES OR SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM HARDSCAPES BY A ROOT BARRIER TO I� f -� -_- i;,�� - - J - PREVENT PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO ANY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. SPECIAL LANDSCAPE NOTES(SECTION 17.56.060): L- � LANDSCAPE PLANTERS ALONG SIDES OF PARKING STALLS SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 90 i `I �' ----- --- — I SQUARE FEET AND THE SMALLEST OUTSIDE DIMENSION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAT SIX FEET. TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AT A RATE OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY THREE PARKING STALLS. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE NOTES: TE + _ PLANT MATERIAL NOT LISTED MAY BE USED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. ALL _ — _ _ -`- - _ - - _ _ GUIDELINES,ACO ES AND REGULATIONS.PE PLANS AND ONS SHALL ADHERE TO CITY DESIGN I T ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. EVERGREEN ACCENT TREE ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED. - I UNDERGROUND WATER QUALITY I' PODOCARPUS 'MONMAL', TYR ------- ------ — — I STORAGE TANK PER CIVIL ENGINEERS I I I DECORATIVE VEHICULAR PRECAST TEMPORARY METAL MANUAL I PLANS I I CONCRETE PAVER'S W/ ENHANCED — _— _ ___— _—_—_ l DOUBLE SWING VEHICULAR , All , , , , , , , , ADJACENT I I 48" HT. BUFFER SCREEN HEDGE RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE BAND AT PEDESTRIAN \ BARRIER GATE. BARRIER GATE TO I I PLANTING, TYP. I CROSSWALKS, TYR BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION I L COMMUNITY , ---- — OF ADJACENT PARKING LOT, VICINITY MAP KEY MAP I I I PERIMETER COMBO (MASONRY/TUBE I _� I UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PER CIVIL I I I I STEEL) RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL I I /��/I __ ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR I I I ' TRANSFORMER PER ELECTRICAL 210 FOOTHILL FWY ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR FLOWERING ACCENT TREES - ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR DECIDUOUS PARKING LOT SHADE TREE LAGERSTROEMIA I. 'DOUBLE DYNAMITE' BASE LINE RD z. COVERED TRASH ENCLOSURE PER PISTACIA 'KEITH DAVEY' TYR ARCHITECTS PLANS EVERGREEN PARKING LOT SHADE TREE - OVERHEAD CARPORT PER a HISTORIC ROUTE 66 MAGNOLIA'D.D. BLANCHARD' ARCHITECTS PLANS, TYP. w ¢ ARROW HWY L-2 o SITE 4TH ST z > a 10 SAN BERNARDINO FWY PH Ifni 1111111 0 N.T.S. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL SITE o' 16, 30' 60' 90, conceptual design & planning company FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED-USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA corporate ~ ' SCALE: •=30' 3195-C Airport Loop Drive , I CDPC PROJECT NO. 21082 x Costa Mesa,CA 92626 C T: .odp inczo .0870 www.ctlpcinacom Development, LLC February 15, 2023 O I j COSTA MESA•ATASCADERO-SANJOSE -LASVEGAS 1 OF PLANT PALETTE Sunset Zone 18 Symbol Botanical Name Common Name WUCOLS ■ TREES REGION 4 ■ POOL COURTYARD LARGE ACCENT ■ ■ Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Low SUCCULENT - DRACAENA DRACO, TYR ■ ■ Flowering Accent Tree POOL COURTYARD LARGE ACCENT Lagersttoemia i. 'Whit X Double Dynamite Crape Myrtle Low SUCCULENT -ALOE BAINESII, TYP. ■ Flowering Accent Tree DECORATIVE POOL DECK PRECAST ■ ® ■ CONCRETE PAVERS, MORTAR SET \ ■ Magnolia g. 'D.D. Blanchard' D.D. Blanchard Southern Magnolia Mod ■ Parking Lot Evergreen Shade NATURAL GRAY PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE ■ . ■ W/TOPCAST FINISH, TYR B 8 B e ■ Olea e. 'Wilsonii" Wilson Fruitless Olive Mod POOL COURTYARD ACCENT PALM - ■ ■ PHOENIX 'MEDJOOL,'TYP. + Parking c Keith Davey Keith Davey Chinese Pistache Mod Panting Lot Deciduous Tree GLASS POOL FENCE & GATE ENCLOSURE ■ PER POOL CODE, MIN, 5' CLEAR OF - ACCENT PALM TREE -WASHINGTONIA'HYBRID' O Podocarpus e. Monmat Icee Blue Yellow-wood Mod PALM TREES, TYR ■ POOL 25' X 40' (1,000 SQ.FT.)W/ MOVABLE Perimeter Accent Tree _ CHAISE LOUNGE CHAIRS & DECORATIVE ■ POTTERY PALMS ■ POOL STEPS & HANDRAILS PER POOL CODE ■ LT ■ Phoenix d. 'Medjol' Medlol Date Palm Low ■ Ll I PRE-FABRICATED 12'X 12' POOL CABANA Accent Palm VEHICULAR CONCRETE DRIVE ■ SURFACE MOUNTED OUTDOOR PING PONG ■ ■ Washingtonia robusta hybrid Mexican Fan Palm LOW APRON PER CIVIL ENGINEERS ■ TABLE W/ MOVABLE TABLES & CHAIRS Accent Palm PLANS ■ DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN PRE-CAST CONCRETE PAVERS, TYP. Aloe bainesii Tree Aloe Low ASPHALT PAVING PER CIVIL � I I I I ■ Pool Courtyard Accent ENGINEERS PLANS BUILT-IN CANTILEVER WOOD BENCH W/ DECORATIVE WOOD OVERHEAD ENTRY DECORATIVE LOW MASONRY ACCENT WALL & Dracaena draco Dragon Tree Low PROPERLY LINE ARBOR W/ DECORATIVE PILASTERS ■ LJ■ LJ I ACCENT SUCCULENT PLANTING Pool Courtyard Accent TRAIL HEAD CONNECTION DECORATIVE 5' HT MASONRY PRIVACY ■ LJ PEDESTRIAN GATE WALL W/ METAL PEDESTRIAN GATE ■ INTEGRAL COLOR PEDESTRIAN _ - - - - - - - - - - - - m m - - - - - -- - - m - - - y Symbol Botanical Name Common Name WUCOLS FIRE HYDRANT PER CIVIL CONCRETE FIELD W/TOPCAST FINISH AT . , ■ POOL COURTYARD SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVERS ENGINEERS PLANS, NP. PASEO, TYR. ; _ \ ■ Alpinia z. 'Variegata' Variegated Shell Ginger High ^' 'h, ■ Carex testacea Orange New Zealand Sedge Mod r - -'r � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - ` -- Canna'Red King Humbert Canna Lily Mod r \ —1 Cordyline f. 'Soledad Purple' Soledad Purple Tit Plant Mod ■ I� L -- • • _ Ligustrum j. 'Texanum' Texas Privet Mod ■ - - Unnonium prezeii Sea Lavendar Mod ■ ` - - -- _ ■ Liriope gigantea Giant Lilylurf Mod ■ ■ Mahonia'Sofi Caress' Soft Caress Mahonia Mod ■ , fA�/ I Monstera deliciosa Split-leaf Philodendron Mod _ _ _ ■ Podocarpus gracilior Fern Podocarpus Mod ■ j - ■ Philodendron selloum Tree Philodendron Mod ■ ; -- ----- -- ��., ■ Phormium Wings of Gold' W ngs of Gold NZ. Flax Mod ■ ■ Strelihla reglnae Bird of Paradise Mod ■ e Zamioculcas zamiifolia ZZ Plant Mod ■ r _ _ _ _ - DECORATIVE WOOD OVERHEAD ENTRY ARBOR ■ ool = W/ DECORATIVE PILASTERS & DECORATIVE LOW ■ __ ■ MASONRY ACCENT WALL AT PASEO ■ -"��- �f �' - FIRE LIFE SAFETY LADDER PAD CLEARANCE i ZONE, APPROVED FOR CITY OF RANCHO � - � � -� -�-� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AM _4' \ 1', � � ■■ CUCAMONGA FIRE AUTHORITY TRANSFORMER PER ELECTRICAL ■ / I B ENGINEERS PLANS, TYP. 1 _ ■ � � � ' DECORATIVE 5' HT. MASONRY PRIVACY WALL W/ ■ COVERED TRASH ENCLOSURE PER METAL PEDESTRIAN GATE ❑- ❑ ■ INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OVERHEAD STRING LIGHTS ATTACHED TO ARCHITECTURE I ■ BANDING AT PASEO, TYR BUILDING &ACCENT PALM TREES AT PASEO VEHICULAR SPEED TABLE W/ BUILT-IN DOUBLE BARBECUE W/ DECORATIVE ■ O ® PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER DECORATIVE VEHICULAR PRECAST COUNTER-TOP, TILE VENEER & BACK SPLASH ® ■ POURED-IN-PLACE RUBBER PLAY ■ SURFACING 18" HT, NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE CONCRETE PAVER'S & ENHANCED \ SEATWALL, TYR CONCRETE BANDING PER CIVIL MOVABLE TABLES, UMBRELLA & CHAIRS �- L% ■ TOT-LOT PLAY EQUIPMENT W/ FALL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY BOLLARD LIGHT PER ENGINEERS PLANS \ 4 ■ ZONE, SEE SHEET L-4 FOR ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, 7YP. PERIMETER COMBO (MASONRY/ A� INFORMATION TUBE STEEL) RETAINING WALL PER i COURTYARD SPECIMEN TREE - O ■ FRUITLESS OLEA'WILSONII' CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANS, TYR t �' - CUSTOM WATER FEATURE W/ DECORATIVE 42" HT. METAL TOT-LOT FENCE & GATE ■ DECORATIVE TILE &ARTISTIC CENTER ■ RECIRCULATING FOUNTAIN EMITTER PRE-FABRICATED CONCRETE FIRE TABLE W/ _-.------- ■ PRE-FABRICATED CONCRETE FIRE a a DECORATIVE GLASS INFILL ■ J! O � _ � � ■ ■ TABLE W/ DECORATIVE GLASS INFILL BUILT-IN WOOD CANTILEVER BENCH W/ ■ AND GLASS WINDSCREEN DECORATIVE LOW MASONRY ACCENT WALL BUILT-IN WOOD CANTILEVER BENCH t . ■ SEATING W/ DECORATIVE LOW - y� ■ MASONRY ACCENT WALL VICINITY MAP KEY MAP f G COURTYARD SHADE TREE -ARBUTUS ■ MARINA,'TYP,kc zlo FooTHaL FwY ■ 6 - �� V ■ BASE LINE RD z ■ a a ■ _ � HISTORIC ROUTE 66 o w � ARROW HWY i m o o SITE - - - - - - . A :'1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - �� z 4TH ST z POST MOUNTED OVERHEAD o STRING LIGHTS 10 SAN BERNARDINO FWY N.T.S. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - COURTYARD'S & PASEO ENLARGEMENT FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED-USE � LE/1 P o s o conceptual design &planning company RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 6CAE:1„=10' JudiooiIryOd Loop Drive ' ^ C to Dee I _ L CDPC PROJECT NO.21082 i Costa Mesa,CA 92626 Q ..Cii; Dc..2. Development, LLC February 15, 2023 z COSTA MESA"ATASCADERO"SAN JOSE -AS VEGAS 2OF4 Ir,/_�/� , 1 'V�4 �. a i F . h tF Al lk Je ry 1 i h - 1 w 4 � v r , i el c_ It 41 p It tA r4il////k _ + 1 _ AO • • ° E, ( + + + 4landscape +��, ++++ structures, + + + + +�+++ + ++ ++++\ + + pA�tur + + + PRELIMINARY WATER-USE CALCULATION +`++++++�++` + + ' + +' ` ' CERTIFIED + . + + + + + + + q + 0 L ¢if +++++++++++++1+ + +IGA� F + + + + + + + I+++ � RERS A'" California Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet + + + + + + + The play camponenta dentifed an this plan +++ + + + + + re IPEM A certifrod.(inlets model number Reference Evapotranspiration ET 49.2 Pro Project Type Residential 0.55 + ++++++++++++++I++ ° 9 preceded wth•)The ate and layout of ( o) 1 Yp + + + + these components conform to the Hydrozone#/ Planting Plant Factor Irrigation Irrigation ETAF Landscape ETAF x Estimated Total + + + + + + +`, egaimmenta of ASTon, F1487.1p o.or fy product certification,visit rrw.ipemo.arg ++ +++++ + + %+++ +I Description' (PF) Method Efficiency(IE)° (PF/IE) Area (Sq. Ft.) Area Water Use +++++++++++++++/ + ETWU d u + + + +++ + + +�+++ + Regular Landscape Areas + + + + + ++++ + + +eCpr+++ + + + + h drozone 1 / TB 0.5 Drip 0.81 0.62 3525 2176 66374 +± rs� ++ +++�+ Y++++++++++ + THIS PLAY AREA&PLAY EQUIPMENT IS h drozone 2 /Low MS 0.2 Overhead 0.75 0.27 14699 3920 119568 o + + + + + +I + + DESIGNED FOR AGES 5-12 YEARS h drozone 3 /Mod MS 0.5 Overhead 0.75 0.67 4346 2897 88380 0 + + + + ++ + + UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. SABLE"BALL o + + + + + f+ h drozone 4 /Hi h MS 0.8 Overhead 0.75 1.07 912 973 29674 0 0 0 0 0 0 sLiD�Rs ++++++++++I++ + IT IS THE MANUFACTURERS OPINION THAT 0.75 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 ao + + + + /+ THIS PLAY AREA DOES CONFORM TO �o CLIMB€ ++++++++/++++ THE A.D.A.ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, p p p p VVIF p p p p + + /+ ASSUMING AN ACCESSIBLE PROTECTIVE 0.75 0.00 0 0 o vvvvvvv , 0 +++ ++ 0.75 0.00 0 O SURFACING IS PROVIDED,AS INDICATED,OR ° � p p p p p p p gj p p p p p p p p p p + ✓ + WITHIN THE ENTIRE USE ZONE. 0.75 0.00 0 0 00 � 000000/0000700000000000 ++ + 0 0 V V V V V V V V 7 VVVVVVVV V 0\7 v v THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN WAS BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO US.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,DETAILED SITE INFORMATION 0.75 0.00 0 0 0 0 D D D o�V V V��11W I 0 V 0 ELT / 2 ° INCLUDING SITE DIMENSIONS,TOPOGRAPHY EXISTING `7 V 0 V V V V '� V d PRI IFY} V V V F / U ILIIIES,SOIL CONDRIONS,AND DRAINAGE S IN E 7 / SOLUTIONS SHOULD BE OBTAINED,EVALUATED,& 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / URUZED IN THE FINAL DESIGN.PLEASE VERIFY ALL 0.75 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIMENSIONS OF PLAY AREA SIZE,ORIENTATION,AND '7 LACATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES,EQUIPMENT, 0.75 0.00 0 0 p '7 V V V v V V V V v V V V V V AND SITE FURNISHINGS PRIOR TO ORDERING.SLIDES D V D V O Q\V 0 V V 17 0 0 0 0 / SHOULD NOT FACE THE HOT AFTERNOON SUN. 0.75 0.00 0 0 00000\ov000voo V V �"V 0 0 / CHOOSE A PROTECTIVE SURFACING MATERIAL THAT HE 0.75 0.00 0 0 0 V 0�V' 0 V 0. 0 L O MAXIMUM FALL HOGHTHEIGFORHT VTHEEEQUIPMENT TO MEET T(REF. V `7,V V 0 ASTM F1487 STANDARD CONSUMER SAFETY 0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION FOR PLAYGROUND 0.75 0.00 0 0 EQUIPMENT FOR PUBUC USE,SECTION 8 CURRENT p / REVISION).THE SUBSURFACE MUST BE WELL 0.7 C O.0 0 0 O DRAINED.IF THE SOIL DOES NOT DRAIN NATURALLY J -- IT MUST BE TILED OR SLOPED 1/8'TO 1/4'PER 0.75 0.00 0 0 FOOT TO A STORM SEWER OR A'FRENCH DRAIN'. AREA OF 0.75 0.00 0 0 ACCESSIB/ROTECTNE SURFACING 0.75 0.00 0 0 (POURED-IN-PLACE SUGGESTED) 0.75 0.00 01 0 0.75 0.00 01 0 Totals 23482 9966 303997 ° Special Landscape Areas 1 0 0 DESIGNED BY: MJO 1 0 0 COPYRIGHT:a/a/zozz LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES,INC. 1 0 0 Estimated manufacturing time: 601 71h STREET SOUTH-P.O.BOX 198 1 0 0 TOTAL ELEVATED PLAY COMPONENTS 2 4 weeks from the time Of OE328-00 NNESOTA 8832E PH:1-r1DD-328-0MIN FAX:53283-972-6091 Totals 1 0 1 0 1 0 TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY RAMP 0 REQUIRED 0 LSI order acceptance, or receipt of TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY TRANSFER 2 REQUIRED 1 SkyWays release of fabrication ETWU Totall 303997 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS SHOWN 4 REQUIRED 1 form if applicable. 8/2/22 1167074-01-01 Mio Maximum Allowed Water Allowance MAWA 393962 e TOTAL DIFFERENT TYPES OF GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS 4 REQUIRED 4 Date Previous Drawing N Initials ETAF Calculations PE: T TY Regular Landscape Areas Average ETAF or Regular Landscape Foothill & Vineyard Mix-Use Coast Recreation, Inc. SYSTEM YSTEMQua s Total ETAF x Area 9966 Areas must be 0.55 or below for SCALE IN FEET UM Total Area 23482 residential areas, and 0.45 or below Lc , 5 10' DRAWING #: � : 2015 for non-residential Taylor Smith Average ETAF 0.42 1 1 67074-01-02 °i""'•° areas. All Landscape Areas Total ETAF x Area 9966 Total Area 23482 PLAY EQUIPEMENT MANUFACTURER CUT-SHEET Average ETAF 0.42 LANDSCAPE NOTE; ❑ ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY ❑ PLANTING MATERIAL SHALL MEET NURSERY STANDARD CROWN WIDTH DESIGN GUIDELINES, CODES AND REGULATIONS. AND HEIGHT FOR THE SPECIFIED CONTAINER SIZE. ❑ ALL PLANTING AREA SHALL BE DRESSED WITH MIN. 3'' LAYER OF MULCH. ❑ LOW VOLUME DISTRIBUTION IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH WEATHER BASED ❑ SITE SOIL SHALL BE TESTED FOR AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY AND SOIL AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL BE USED IN MANAGEMENT PURPOSES AFTER SITE GRADING, BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING, �► _ - COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WATER SITE SOIL IN PLANTING AREA SHALL BE ROTOTILLED AND AMENDED EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES, ACCORDING TO SOILS TEST RECOMMENDATIONS, -- ❑ RAINBIRD SQ, STREAM BUBBLER, DRIP BUBBLER, AND HUNTER MP ❑ ALL ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES AND TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE ROTATOR NOZZLES SHALL BE USED FOR LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SCREENED WITH HEDGES, VINES, OR OTHER APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL WATER DISTRIBUTION. OR LANDSCAPE TREATMENT, , ❑ IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH MASTER VALVE AND ❑ LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED BY OWNER. PRESSURE REGULATOR TO PREVENT WATER WASTE, ❑ SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR AND ❑ 24'' DEEP ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE PLANTED CHECK VALVE TO PREVENT MISTING AND HEAD DRAINAGE, 5' OR LESS OF HARDSCAPE SURFACE, ❑ TREES SHALL BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY FROM SHRUBS AND GROUND /. COVERS. r ❑ SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS WHERE IRRIGATION WATER IS CONTAINED WITHIN PERVIOUS SURFACE. ❑ QUICK COUPLING VALVE SHALL BE LOCKING TYPE. ❑ IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND BREAKAGE WEEKLY. ❑ WATERING SCHEDULE SHALL BE REVIEWED QUARTERLY. -" - �VU1 Foot h i I I & Vineyard Mix - Use OI�St landscape RECRE4T/ON/NC. structures 1167074-01-02 08.04.2022 PLAY EQUIPMENT 3D COLOR RENDERING PRELIMINARY WATER CALCULATION & PLAY EQUIPMENT DATA FOOTHILL AND VINEYARD MIXED-USE conceptual design & planning company Corporate Office;31 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Studio Airport Loop Drive L-4 Studio One CDPC PROJECT NO. 21082 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 T: w.cdp inc.co r� www.cdpcinc,com Development, LLC February 15, 2023 ' Y° COSTA MESA aATASCADERO aSANJOSE aLASVEGAS 4 OF 4 Thornhill, Elizabeth From: Barbara Kaufman <bakphoto@aol.com> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 7:37 AM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe Subject: Leap Development CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. want to express concern of the development on Foothill and Vineyard. DO NOT want a 160 unit apartment building in the area. It would cause a lot traffic and congestion in the area. I have noticed a lot of apartment complexes going up in the city and not sure why the city is allowing all of these units to be built. It takes away the charm of our small country city by overpopulating our city!!! Thank you, Barbara Kaufman Bannowsky Exhibit B 1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS February 28, 2023 6:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner DESIGN REVIEW - LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC — A request for a site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use development comprising 160 residential units and 1 live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial area and a Variance for a reduction in the non-residential requirement for mixed-use projects for a site on 4.46 acres of land at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue in the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone. APN: 0207-211-43 and -44. (Design Review DRC2022-00189 and Variance DRC2023-00022) Site Characteristics and Background: The undeveloped 4.46-acre project site is located near the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. The site is adjacent to a commercial development at the street corner that is in the process of being redeveloped including the replacement of 3 of the 6 onsite commercial buildings and includes the historic Klusman residence. The dimensions of the L-shaped project site are approximately 585 feet along the south property line, 407 feet west property line, 263 and 290 feet along the north property line, and 135 and 272 along the east property line. The site slopes from north to south from 1,226 feet elevation along the north property line to 1,213 feet elevation along the south property line for a total grade change of approximately 13 feet. The existing land use, General Plan designation, and Zones for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zone Site Vacant & Existing Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Commercial Center Moderate North Commercial Center Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate South Multi-Family Development Suburban Neighborhood Medium (M) Residential East Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate West Single-Family Residences Suburban Neighborhood Corridor 1 (CO1) Form-Based Code: The project site is within Corridor 1 (CO1)zone which is designated for a medium-intensity mixed- use development that transitions existing auto-oriented corridors to vibrant areas that promote walkability. The site plan is designed to comply with the requirements and the intent of the CO1 zone by creating a residential component to the existing auto-oriented commercial center. It will provide a pedestrian network connecting it to the adjacent commercial center, the adjacent public streets, and the existing walking/biking trail to the west. The Ground floor of the project will consist of residential units with private entrances as well as the leasing office and recreational amenities, including a public pocket park. Based on the size of the parcel, the lack of street visibility, and the adjacency of the existing commercial center, it was determined that a non-residential component would not be required. A variance has been submitted for the reduction in non-residential land use requirements which will be addressed as part of the public hearing at the Planning Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2022-00189— LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC February 28, 2023 Page 2 Commission meeting. The project does include one live-work unit to help activate a proposed pocket park. Project Design and Layout: The project is comprised of three 4-story buildings (Buildings 1, 2, and 3) located to the southwest of, and will share access with, the existing commercial center. Buildings 1 and 2 include open courtyards that face each other and are separated by a paseo which provides public access to the biking/walking path that is adjacent to the existing trail along the flood control channel. Building 3 is built around an interior parking lot and includes covered parking. Buildings 1 and 3 will front an existing drive aisle which separates the project from the existing commercial center and Building 2 will face a new drive aisle that provides access to vehicle parking on the south side of Buildings 2 and 3. An additional new drive aisle will provide access around each of the buildings and to the currently vacant retail building located to the east of the project site. The ground floor units will directly face the drive aisles or internal courtyards and will include residential units, a leasing office, and recreational amenities. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD s It { I It y it _ it 0 o k-- __ BLDG."e o T1 FT — a L Q RETNL I.700 5F 3 R-A Port ar PRQ ECT n o o G I _ zaou Y Access: DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2022-00189— LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC February 28, 2023 Page 3 Vehicle and pedestrian access are provided from existing driveways off Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue which also serve the adjacent commercial center. Pedestrian pathways are located on the east side of Buildings 1 and 2 and along the north and west side of Building 3. A "Tabletop" (or raised) pedestrian crossing connects the paseo between Buildings 1 and 2 and the sidewalk on the west side of Building 3. Parking is provided in private garages, freestanding carports, and uncovered parking spaces. Architecture: The Form-Based building type is Mid-Rise with Building 1 and 2 built around courtyards and Building 3 around a parking area. The buildings are designed in a modern architectural style that includes flat roofs, tower elements, recessed windows, and balconies. Building materials include the use of stucco, fiber cement siding, stone and brick veneer, and metal awnings which are carried to all elevations. Horizontal articulation along the building plane as well as vertical articulation along the building's roofline breaks down the building massing and creates architectural interest. The building design complies with the objective design standards outlined in Chapter 17.123 of the Development Code including providing pedestrian orientation, fagade articulation, integrated porches and balconies, and roof and parapet designs, The design also complies with the objective design standards outlined in Article VIII (Form Based Code) of the Development Code including building (Mid-Rise) and frontage types (porch variation) types, building entrance design and pedestrian orientation. The ground floor units facing drive aisles provide seating areas with secondary access to the units and the leasing office and onsite amenities are designed to appear as commercial units and include tall storefront windows and metal awnings. Unit Composition and Floor Plan: The project is comprised of 161 walk-up residential units. The majority of the residential units are single-level and range in size from 680 to 1,617 square feet. The table below summarizes the number of residential units: UNIT SUMMARY Residential Unit Type Unit Size SF - Net) Number of Units 1 Studio Live-Work Unit 495 SF 1 1 Bedroom 680 to 792 SF 65 2 Bedroom 975 to 1,316 SF 89 3 Bedroom 1,399— 1,617 SF 6 Total Number of Units 161 Commercial Total Area Live-Work 745 SF Commercial Lease Area 1 Recreational Amenities —Open Space: Resident amenities include a clubhouse with kitchen, fitness room, pool/spa with lounge seating areas, and children's play equipment. Based on the project size (over 3 acres), two public open space amenities are required. The project includes a pocket park with a flexible lawn area, seat wall, public art, and a paseo that provides a connection through the project to the adjacent public walking trail. DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2022-00189— LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC February 28, 2023 Page 4 Fencing: The project site is ungated except for the private recreation amenities in the courtyards of Buildings 1 and 2. Due to onsite grades, an up to 8-foot-high combination retaining wall and wrought iron fence is necessary between the project site and the SB County flood control canal to the west and multi-family development to the south. Compliance with Development Standards: The project was designed in compliance with Article VIII (Form-Based Code) of the Development Code for projects within the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone and shown in the following table: COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Standard Required Proposed Complies Density 24-42 DU/AC 37 DU/AC YES Non-Residential Use Mix 20 Percent Less than 1% NO ' Primary Build to Line 0/15 Feet NA YES 2 (Max/Min) Parking Setback 40' NA YES 2 Rear Setback Minimum 10' 49" YES Building Height 5 stories 4 Stories YES Open Space 30 sf/unit* 34,066 sf YES (4,830sf) Variance Requested (Adjacent Commercial Center Provides 29,000 SF Non-Residential) 2 Not Located Directly on Public Street Parking: The parking for the project is based on Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). The parking analysis table below provides a breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces on-site: DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2022-00189— LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC February 28, 2023 Page 5 PARKING ANALYSIS* Number Square Parking Ratio Required of Units Footage Parking Multi-family Unit 1 N/A 1.3 per unit 2 (Live-Work) Multi-family Unit 65 N/A 1.5 per unit 97 (one bedroom) Multi-family Unit 89 N/A 2 per unit (two bedrooms) 178 Multi-family Unit 6 N/A 2 per unit 12 (three bedrooms) Live-Work Unit N/A 745 1 per 250 SF for 3 commercial units Visitor parking 161 N/A 1 per 5 units 33 Total Parking Spaces Required 325 Total Parking Spaces Provided 332 Total Covered Parking Spaces (Required/Provided) 167/167 Parking Surplus 7 Staff Recommendation: The project meets the General Plan's vision for a form-based development within the underlying zone by providing a transition from the existing auto-oriented corridors along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue to a more pedestrian-friendly residential realm. The design also conforms with the objective design standards outlined in Chapter 17.123 (Multi-Family Residential and Mixed Use) and Article VIII (Form Based Code) including building placement in relationship to the build-to-lines, building, and frontage types, building form, pedestrian orientation, and publicly accessible open spaces. Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below. x❑Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2022-00189 — LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC February 28, 2023 Page 6 shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. El Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Desicgn Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Acting Principal Planner WCITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Design Review Committee Meeting Rains Conference Room Meeting Agenda February 28, 2023 FINAL MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 6:00 p.m. A. Call to Order The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on February 28, 2023. The meeting was called to order by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:04 p.m. Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chair Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner James Daniels. Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner B. Public Communications Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2022. Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Project Review Items D1. DESIGN REVIEW - LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC — A request for a site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use development comprising 160 residential units and 1 live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial area and a Variance for a reduction in the non-residential requirement for mixed-use projects for 4.41 acres of land at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue in the Corridor 1 (C01) Zone. APN: 0207-211-43 and -44. (Design Review DRC2022-00280 and Variance DRC2023-00022). The Committee took the following action: The Design Review Committee stated that the project was well designed and recommended that the project, including variance, move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote E. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Planning and Economic Development Department Approved: DRC Meeting April 4, 2023. Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes — February 28, 2023 Page 2 of 2 FINAL EXHIBIT D Due to file size,this attachment can be accessed through the following link: CEQA SECTION 15183 COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memo Exhibit D RESOLUTION NO. 23-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00189, A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING 160 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 1 LIVE-WORK UNIT WITH 745 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AREA AND A VARIANCE FOR A REDUCTION IN THE NON-RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR MIXED- USE PROJECTS FOR A SITE ON 4.46 ACRES OF LAND NEAR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE CORRIDOR 1 (CO1) ZONE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-211-43 AND -44. A. Recitals. 1. Leap Development, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2022-00189, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of April 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 26, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant site located near the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard containing a site area of approximately 4.46 acres; and b. The existing land use, General Plan designation, and Zones for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zone Site Vacant & Existing Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Commercial Center Moderate North Commercial Center Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate South Multi-Family Development Suburban Neighborhood Medium (M) Residential East Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate West Single-Family Residences Suburban Neighborhood Corridor 1 (CO1) Exhibit E Low PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-09 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00189—LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 2 c. The proposed project consists of the construction multi-family development comprising 160 residential units and 1 live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial lease area; and d. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on February 28, 2023. The Committee approved the project as presented; and e. The project includes a related Variance (DRC2023-00022) to reduce the required 20 percent nonresidential land use percentage requirement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan Designation for the project site is Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate, which envisions a mix of medium-density residential and non-residential land uses. The project proposes a total of 160 multifamily units that include one live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial, providing a density of 37 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the intent of the General Plan. A Variance has been submitted to reduce the non-residential requirement based on the size of the parcel, the lack of street visibility, and the adjacency of the existing commercial center; and b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within Corridor 1 (CO1)zone which is designated for a medium-intensity mixed-use development that transitions existing auto-oriented corridors to vibrant areas that promote walkability. The site plan is designed to comply with the requirements and the intent of the CO1 zone by creating a residential neighborhood adjacent to the auto-oriented commercial center currently under construction at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. A Variance has been submitted to reduce the non-residential requirement based on the land-locked nature of the subject project site, the lack of street frontage, and the adjacency of the existing commercial center; and c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code except for the requirement to provide a non-residential component. A Variance has been submitted to reduce the non-residential requirement based on the land-locked nature of the subject project site, the lack of street frontage, and the adjacency of the existing commercial center; and d. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. A CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum was prepared for the project that demonstrates that the project would not have an impact on the environment not already contemplated in the General Plan EIR. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-09 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00189—LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 3 a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan (GP) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GP, the Project site was designated for"Mix- Use City Corridor Moderate" land use, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 24 to 42 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.4 to 1.0. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale. b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, "if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards...then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." The 4.46-acre property is designated by the City's General Plan for "Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" land uses. The proposed Project is consistent with the site's GP land use designation of"Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" except for a request for a variance to reduce the non-residential land use requirement and would be consistent with all other applicable GP policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project. C. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated April 4, 2023, was prepared by Michael Baker International (Exhibit D—CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City's GP on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GP EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-09 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00189— LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 4 I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of April 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 23-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2023-00022, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE NON-RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR MIXED-USE PROJECTS FOR A SITE ON 4.46 ACRES OF LAND NEAR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE CORRIDOR 1 (CO1) ZONE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207- 211-43 AND -44. A. Recitals. 1. Leap Development, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2023- 00022, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of April 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 26, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant site located near the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard containing a site area of approximately 4.46 acres; and b. The existing land use, General Plan designation, and Zones for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zone Site Vacant & Existing Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Commercial Center Moderate North Commercial Center Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate South Multi-Family Development Suburban Neighborhood Medium (M) Residential East Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use City Corridor Corridor 1 (CO1) Moderate West Single-Family Residences Suburban Neighborhood Corridor 1 (CO1) Exhibit F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-10 VARIANCE DRC2023-00022 — LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 2 c. The Variance request is related to the construction of a multi-family development comprising 160 residential units and 1 live-work unit with 745 square feet of commercial lease area; and d. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on February 28, 2023. The Committee approved the project as presented. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this code. The project site is located in the CO1 Zone which is intended for the development of projects with a mix of residential and non-residential land uses. Requiring the project to provide a 20 percent non-residential land use mix would create a physical hardship as the project site does not include either a street frontage or street visibility making leasing the non-residential floor area difficult; and b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The subject project site is exceptional in that it is located behind an existing commercial center and lacks street visibility and street signage rights which are generally prerequisites for the development and success of non-residential land uses; and c. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. The project's site's lack of street frontage or visibility makes developing the site with a 20 percent non-residential land use mix unfeasible depriving the applicant of property development right enjoyed by other property owners in the same zone; and d. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Developing the project site without the required 20 percent non-residential land use mix would not constitute a special privilege in that the project site is adjacent to a commercial center which taken together will fulfill the intent of the CO1 Zone by creating a mixed-use development that transitions existing auto-oriented corridors and places to vibrant areas that promote walkability; and e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.A CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum was prepared for the project that demonstrates that the project would not have an impact on the environment not already contemplated in the General Plan EIR. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-10 VARIANCE DRC2023-00022 — LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 3 a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan (GP) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for "Mix-Use City Corridor Moderate" land use, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 24 to 42 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.4 to 1.0. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale. b. Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, "if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards...then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." The 4.46-acre property is designated by the City's General Plan for "Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" land uses. The proposed Project is consistent with the site's GPU land use designation of"Mixed-Use City Corridor Moderate" except for a request for a variance to reduce the non-residential land use requirement and would be consistent with all other applicable GP policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project. C. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated April 4, 2023, was prepared by Michael Baker International (Exhibit D—CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City's GP on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GP EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-10 VARIANCE DRC2023-00022 — LEAP DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 26, 2023 Page 4 I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26t" day of April 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures outlined in the CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated April 4, 2023, prepared by Michael Baker International 2. Garage/carport structures shall have materials, finishes, trim, and colors that match the corresponding elements of the primary building of a multi-family residential development or the main dwelling unit of a single-family residential development. 3. The project shall remain in compliance with the parking management plan at all times. In the event of any observed parking violations to the parking management plan, the City reserves the right to require the preparation of off-site, on-street parking restrictions such as, but not limited to, no parking signage, time-limit parking signage, red curb, any necessary street repairs/improvements, or the establishment of the parking district at the cost of the property owner/developer. 4. The applicant shall work with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to construct an ADA-compliant pedestrian connection between the proposed access gate along the west property line of the project site and the Cucamonga Creek Trail. The access gate to the multi-use trail shall remain open for access through the project by the general public. Standard Conditions of Approval 5. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively "Indemnitees"), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning and Economic Development Director's actions, the Planning Commission's actions, and/or the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 9. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 10. For multiple-family development, provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California Green Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 2 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning and Economic Development Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 13. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Economic Development Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 14. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 15. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 16. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 17. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 18. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 19. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 20. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning and Economic Development Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 21. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 22. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning and Economic Development Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 3 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning and Economic Development Department. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 4. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 4 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 6. The developer shall provide proof of access to Foothill and Vineyard via easements or CC&R's, or obtain an easement, or agreement, for joint use driveways for access to Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 7. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 5 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring . Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 9. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 10. All public improvements, if any, (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 6 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Fire suppression systems are required to be monitored in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 4. Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 5. Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 6. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 7. Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 7 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site. Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards, an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code. 9. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. 10. Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com. 11. Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months. 12. Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the shrubs and trees. 13. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 14. Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is required to be implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of foundation form materials. The Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan is required to be in compliance with Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction permits being approved and issued. 15. Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 16. A standpipe system is required to be installed in accordance with Section 905 of the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 8 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior walls of all normally occupied buildings. 18. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CRC NFPA 13, 13D, 13R and the Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. Infrastructure for accessible EV charging station is required. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 9 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi-family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi-family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 10 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 11 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the channel (Approval from San Bernardino County Flood Control is required) ; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 27. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 28. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 12 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 32. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to Foothill Blvd, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 35. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 36. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 37. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 13 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 40. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 41. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be prepared as a Phased WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural devices may be constructed as construction progresses. 42. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 43. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 14 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. 45. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 47. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 15 of 16 Project#: DRC2022-00189 DRC2023-00022 Project Name: Foothill &Vineyard Mixed Use Location: 8833 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020721143-0000 Project Type: Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 48. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/27/2023 Page 16 of 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3rpm DATE: April 26, 2023 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matt Marquez, Planning and Economic Development Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP— FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT GROUP— A request to subdivide a 3.59-acre project site into two (2) parcels, related to the previous approval of a 72-bed residential care facility within the Medium (M) Residential Zone at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; APN: 0201-821-51. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15315—Minor Land Divisions. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034- 1, (replacing expired Tentative Map SUBTPM20034), through the adoption of the attached Resolutions and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A subdivision of 3.59 acres into 2 residential parcels of land to create a shared parking facility between the existing church at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street and the approved senior care facility on the project site. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved the construction and operation of the related 72-bed senior memory care facility on the 3.59-acre project site on November 13, 2019. That approval included the following entitlements: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034, for the subdivision of the project site into two parcels; Design Review DRC2017-01011, for the design of the senior care facility; Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003 for the operation of the facility; and Minor Exception DRC20170-0100 for wall heights due to onsite grades. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street, previously owned the subject parcel with the intent of constructing a larger church on the site. Ultimately, they decided to sell a portion of the parcel, with the remaining portion of the parcel to be retained by the church to meet their minimum parking requirements. The subdivision of the project site was, and remains, necessary to legally divide the property to allow the church to retain its required parking and sell the remaining land. For context, please reference Figure 1 below: Shepard of the Hills Church Ij I° IBA515CF 9FAAING51 N UT5152'E s BANYAN zxEET I _ °ate xu I y I Proposed Shepard of the Hills Church Parking f , I � PARCEL 8 II 31,645 SQ.FT. 0.73 AC I ' I WCEL2 PM9135 z ' I I PARCEL l ` ` ' 124,598 SO.FT. 2,86 AC ° 1 Approved Senior Care Facilitv Flu rwaaF.;..o;r 1 Figure 1 —Proposed Tentative Map The approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 was for a period of 3 years pursuant to timelines established in the Municipal Code Section 16.16.160 and expired on November 13, 2022. The related entitlements were approved for 5 years and will not expire until November 13, 2024. Ownership of the project has changed and the current owners, Flatiron Development Group, submitted the current tentative parcel map application and have also submitted building and grading permits for the project. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site was previously owned by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church, whose primary campus is across the street from the project site at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The project site is currently developed with a parking lot being used by the church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway, and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-ways. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade change between the north property line (1,620 feet) and the south property line (1,590 feet), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place. There are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential North Existing Church Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Multi-Family South Development Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Single-Family East Residences Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Single-Family West Residences Suburban Neighborhood Very Low Low L Residential ANALYSIS: The subject tentative parcel map is related to the previous approval for the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1 (replacing expired Tentative Map SUBTPM20034) is for the subdivision of the 3.59 project site into two parcels of land. The residential care facility will be located on Parcel A (2.86 acres) and will include 42 parking spaces. The church will maintain ownership of Parcel B (.73 acres) which will include 66 parking spaces to be used for overflow parking for church-related uses. Public Art: Tentative maps are exempt from public art requirements as outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.118. The related senior care facility (Design Review DRC2017-01011) is required to provide public art with a minimum value of$43,375 ($1.00 per square foot) based on the size of the proposed structure (43,375 square feet) or to pay the equivalent amount into the City's public art trust fund. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315— Minor Land Divisions. The project is for the subdivision of 3.59 acres into two parcels of land. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The environmental impacts from the development of the residential care facility were previously analyzed during the entitlement process for the project. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed tentative parcel map will meet the City Council's core values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and relentless pursuit of improvement as it facilitates the construction of a previously approved Senior Care facility to the benefit of current and future residents. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 13, 2023, the property was posted on April 12, 2023, and notices were mailed to 142 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 11, 2023. To date, Staff has not received any comments related to the project. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Planning Commission Staff Report Dated November 13, 2019 Exhibit D - Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1 Exhibit E - Conditions of Approval k 1 Al— x►rux •x i r 4 � 'e .. ,. Project Site �• , _' pr . Op R, } veC�� IL Exhibit A a < Poplar St CD Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave N a: n APN:0201-594-01-0000 a RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-8 DU/AC) } , ° PROJECT SITE a Northridq n I I Manzanita Dr L I I � f=f'I Manzanita Dr `00� /D Ghaffey College Q Grigsby Field PARCEL 1 - PM 4735 /Z7 2 G I L/� rn Panther ocive APN:0201-821-50-0000 a 7 RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-4 DU/AC) F Coca Sv O z Lowder Baseball Field 0 Los Osos High Scho -� CoElegea� - - > > B=STREET Ban St Banyan BANYAN-iya 140 Haven Avenue S' ? a 'm a iv b m F-11 < r y M SEWER MANHOLE CM I EXISTING Lemon Ave Lemon Ave Lemon Ave a 16R M TOP 0 Sierra Heights 1PN Vint h Apartments a (E) 1611.54 INV o d o � Borgata HOA 0 �0 11i11.44 INV - - (BASIS OF BEARINGS) N 89 51 52 E - 1249.09 g m Highland Avenue w B v 4 0. - - j - 1 n Christian School 0 1 1 1 222.35' o H WY 21 Oathill Fwy 1026.74' EXISTING 3 mI Foothill Fwy CD BANYAN STREET SEWER MANHOLF I e Highland k0landAve 1619.43 wM 1619.55 wM ( C 9 THILL FREEWAY M ` 1619.17 T g�o 1616.68 EG I F O O 1619.16 EG 1619.37 EG 1679.57 1619.24 EG 7619.07£G 1 M AI -90�25�27�� Foothill Fv wry �,aw° 1 1619.06 EG 1 T 1618.4 3.20 NV 1617.57 EG CM 16.47 FL I g �. way y FinchAve you 1 106 I'll HI 1s18s R=20.00 5unrid e Pines ° Ken 0"CF 0"GF 1 162 4 1621. 21, 1 1 1�.38 EG L=31.56 Pve Markets Q Apartment Homes A, JF �n II` ' P Heather St Heather • • h 9th St Ring Ave Rine Ave Rtin Sonora Ave •� 1615.2 - 79t1 19th St SEARCHED FOR 1"l.P. i' I 35' _ I 1614.32EG T 19TH STREET ModocSt .� PER PARCEL MAP o. ' 1614.23 FL a NOTHI G FOUND EXISTING .1 a Hamilton St W FACE WA L 0.6F ` �'h • a I a n M 0 10 `n a Charies�° victo w OF Y DRIVEWAY 1613.09 FL a' Gala Ave rst R ENTRANCE �1sf325 EG � Erna UL - 8 - -- \ z \ D M C Victoria St 8 42 1" E 53.49' Victoria St a ��`c Delaware Sr Ve Victoria St E FACE WALL 2.95' W. , r-I < T 17 m < I \ 1612.15 FL ,� OF WLY R a ru rn Monte Vista St o Monte Vista St o n o • 1611.90 EG I Z n ID � Pairmant WaY PARCEL B ,• I C La Vine St La Vine St La Vine-- Log GRAPELA'ND ( ) \ ! ` ��' u Alta Vista Mobile© Vaienr APN:0201-821-34-0000 134' lore Springs RESIDENTIAL:LOW 2-4 DU/AC 31 ,645 S Q • F T. L, ... q VARIES 90' Home Gomm a a Ramona Villa© >♦ a .S. - -T_ i =ti:: rc hobile Home Est Central-Park 0 . 73 AC .92� � FIRE I I Base Line Rd lase Line Rd � Base Line Rd Base Line.Rd Bas BASE LINE LANE \ a ._.. ROAD. Ift0 Fl \ VICINITY MAP W FACE WALL 2.86' APN:0201-594-22-0000 OF WLY 6 RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-8 DU/AC) N.T.S. W FACE WALL-0.97'W. 'o FL OF WLY R _ I NOTES: I � APN: 0201-821-30-0000 RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-4 DU/AC) ; I 1 . ADDRESS: 6140 HAVEN AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 8'-1z o a o a o 2. APN: 0201 -821 -51 -0000 C.iBLK WALL W CON - j I Q I\ � HELD RECORD 3. ZONING: RESIDENTIAL I AN PER PM 4735 4. CLOSEST INTERSECTING PUBLIC STREETS: BANYAN ST & HAVEN AVE PARCEL 2 PM 4735 5. ALL PARCELS ARE VACANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA 61 HAVEN AVENUE w •I , I'I I 6. PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE PER TREE REPORT PREPARED BY I I / APN: 0201-821-51-0000 i j I L. NEWMAN DESIGN GROUP, INC.. DATED: AUGUST 22, 2018 / RESIDENTIAL: LOW (2-4 DU/AC) w Q I APN:0201-594-23-0000 fl EASEMENTS: RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-8 DU/AC) APN: 0201-821-29-0000 C'''I RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-4 DU/AC) L 6 ITEM # 7: AN EASEMENT FOR ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS OR BOTH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK C' 1- �- 9282, PAGE 407 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. CI VI PARCEL A °0 J I ITEM # 8: AN EASEMENT FOR ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS OR BOTH AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK W FACE WALL 1.28' W. a 124 ,598 SQ . FT.III APN:0201-594-24-0000 9282, PAGE 408 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. OF WLY A a / I RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2 8 DU/AC) W OFwWLY �O iZ. 2 . 86 AC II N rc '< 98.16 - - - - TE N TAT IVE I_�� 1�98.08 - - O < U j,_M I ® Z > z 7 D CF N M ; 1596.4 I APN: 0201-821-28-0000 w z I I PARCEL MAP NO . 20034 - 1 RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-4 DU/AC I w APN:0201-594-25-0000 Do TC RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-8 DU/AC) \ \ i 1 i95.05 fi I A I TA E I R L - I 4. V V Fif 1594.02 - - - _ SINGLE STORY 72 BED FACILITY o 0 0 0 0 �� •I, 6140 HAVEN AVENUE I DRAIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91737 W F E WALL 0.29' E. I R I I TG WLY 15sz.2- \ FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROAD I .Ljl II I I APN:0201-594-26-0000 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXISTING RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-8 DU/AC) PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4735, , APN: 0201-821-27-0000 \ Q III 60"R.C.P. RESIDENTIAL:LOW(2-4 DU/AC) I - STORM DRAT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 12NAIL �2 I AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 52 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 12, waLL SEARCHED FOR N89057'33"E l',16.71' �h �- - - - - RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. 1 1/2"LP. PER HELD RECORD TRACT No. 9286 z APN:0201-321-14-0000 z NOTHING FOUND 9 ANGLE PER PM 435 tap f o a l f P � RESIDENTIAL:MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) � /15 47 P07HIN F No. 99� I i 1588.87 Ec EXIST NG o m o m o m 8 1588.73 FL S WER M NHOLE n (1590.1 RIM) r P r lW6.42 FL H 580.1 INV) December 20, 2022 r2zj O ORI Ar STA 237+27.10 r\, C4 ew EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 1626.60 (N) 4 1626.24 (S) • EXISTING 10" SEWER I QROFESS/oV LEGEND: UTILITIES a• � � � � � � � �G�PRD E Op�F�m EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICITY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CABLE TV: TIME WARNER CABLE W r^ 0I No. C48987 PROPOSED PARCEL LINE - - - - DISTRICT 3 PHONE: (888) 892-2253 PHONE: (909) 357-6103 Exp. 9-30-24 PROPERTY LINE - - - - CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS sr9l C I V 1 \' RANCHO CUCAMONGA PHONE: (866) 499-8080 F OF CAOOR CENTERLINE - - MUNICIPAL UTILITY 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OVERALL PROPERTY ELECTRIC LINE W RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91 730 PHONE: (855) 325-6243 PHONE: (909) 477-2740 -�� GAS LINE - G - SATELLITE: HUGHESNET AREA DESCRIPTION S.F. AC. SANITARY SEWER LINE - SS GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS PHONE: (877) 464-9363 GROSS/NET 156,243.1 3.59 - PHONE: (800) 427-2200 TELEPHONE LINE T REFUSE: BURRTEC DISPOSAL PROPOSED PARCEL AREAS PREPARED BY: DEVELOPER: WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 9820 CHERRY AVENUE WATER LINE - W - 10440 ASHFORD ST. FONTANA, CA 92335 PARCE L A 124,598 2.86 SCALE : 1 II = 30' NG -Lq RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PHONE: (909) 987-3717 �� "�q PACIFIC COAST CIVIL, INC. FLATIRON PHONE: (909) 944-6000 PARCEL B 31 /645 0.73 c� 9 30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 200 N Z ® 2 668 NORTH COAST HWY., STE 1231 ATTENTION: IF, THIS MAP IS PROVIDED IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (ON COMPUTER DISK) AS A COURTESY 0 30 LO 90 j z AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 0 TO CLIENT. THE DELIVERY OF THE ELECTRONIC FILE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE DELIVERY OF OUR U 7 ?� PH: (81 8) 865-4 168 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 PROFESSIONAL WORK PRODUCT. THE SIGNED PAPER PRINT DELIVERED WITH THIS ELECTRONIC FILE CONSTITUTES OUR PROFESSIONAL WORK PRODUCT, AND IN THE EVENT THE ELECTRONIC FILE IS ALTERED, J FAX: (81 8) 865-4 1 98 (213) 247-8005 LLJ THE PRINT MUST BE REFERRED TO, FOR THE ORIGINAL AND CORRECT GRADING DESIGN INFORMATION. WE `�N/13na Q SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS MADE TO THE ELECTRONIC FILE, OR FOR ANY x t o PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM THE ELECTRONIC FILE WHICH ARE NOT REVIEWED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY US. SHEET: 1 OF 1 O QARANCHO CUCAMONGA\22-1857 6140 HAVEN AVE\TPM\22-1857 TPM 20034-1.DWG CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10M STAFF REPORT DATE: November 13, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM20034 , DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017- 01011, MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00465 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-01003, — RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING — A request to subdivide a 3.59 acre project site into two (2) parcels, to construct and operate a 72-bed residential care facility totaling 43,375 square feet, and to request an increase in height for walls/fences up to 8 feet total for security purposes within the Low (L) Residential District at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; APN: 0201-821-51. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034, Design Review DRC2017-01011, Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00465 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions and Conditions of Approval. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is currently owned by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church, whose primary campus is across the street from the project site at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The project site is currently developed with a landscaped parking being used by the church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right- of-way. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line (1,620 foot) and the south property line (1,590 foot), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place. There are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low L Residential District Medium South Multi-Family Development Residential Medium (M) Residential District Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465—ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 2 Low-Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District ANALYSIS: A. The project scope is for the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low(L) Residential District. The project includes Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 for the subdivision of the 3.59 project site into two parcels of land. The residential care facility will be located on Parcel A(2.86 acres)and will include 42 parking spaces.The church will maintain ownership of Parcel B (.73 acres)which will include 66 parking spaces to be used for overflow parking for church-related uses. Both Parcels A and B meet the minimum area and dimension requirements for the Low (L) Residential Zoning District. The 43,375 square foot single-story structure is designed to evoke the Craftsman architectural design style including the use of a flat concrete roof tile, painted cementitious horizontal shake siding, and stone veneer wainscoting. A bus shelter will be provided on the Haven Avenue street frontage that is designed to complement the main building including the use of a flat concrete tile roof supported by battered columns. The facility is broken up into 4 residential "neighborhoods" with unique identities and visual decor to ease resident anxiety through familiar surroundings. Each neighborhood includes a living room, den, a residential kitchen and a dining room where meals are served (meals prepared in a common kitchen). A "town center" will connect the four "neighborhoods" and will feature a health center, community center, studio and beauty salon/barber. Outdoor facilities include 2 courtyards and a larger secure common open space area. The facility will include 8-foot- high wrought iron fencing along the north, south and west building elevations for security purposes. Vinyl gates and fencing will be used along the west elevation to complement the front facade of the building. The maximum permitted wall height within residential districts is 6 feet. The applicant has submitted Minor Exception DRC2019-00465 to permit the additional wall/fence height in order to prevent memory care residents from wandering away from the facility and to screen a back-up generator. Vehicular access to the site will be provided by 2 existing driveways, one on Haven Avenue and one on Banyan Street. Decorative stamped paving is proposed at both drive entrances as well as at a circular pedestrian drop off area at the main building entrance. A gated fire access drive will be located adjacent to the south property line. Outdoor lighting is proposed throughout the parking lot, pedestrian walkways and along the exterior walls of the building. The freestanding outdoor lights will have a maximum height of 15 feet, which is the maximum permitted within residential districts. The existing perimeter walls located along the south and west property lines will remain in place and will be repaired and painted to match the main building. Landscaping will be provided around the entire structure and in the parking lot area in compliance with the parking lot landscape requirement of 1 tree per 3 parking spaces. A circular pedestrian drop-off area will be provided at the front entrance that will include a large specimen multi-trunk live oak tree. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 3 The project complies with each of the related development requirements except for wall/fence height for the Low (L) Residential District as demonstrated in the following table: Required/Maximum Provided Complies? Building Setback (Haven Avenue) 45 Feet 120 Feet Yes Building Setback (Banyan Street) 35 Feet 121 Feet Yes Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 22 Feet Yes Side Yard Setback 5 Feet 53 Feet Yes Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 Percent 25 Percent Yes Wall/Fence Height 6 Feet 8 Feet Yes, with Minor Exception B. Parking: The proposed Residential Care Facility is categorized under a congregate health facility in Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code. Congregate health facilities are required to provide 1 parking space per 4 beds, which translates into a parking requirement of 18 parking spaces based on the proposed 72-bed facility. The proposed facility will provide 42 parking spaces on their parcel, which should adequately serve the 26 employees on the largest shift as well as any guests. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church will maintain ownership of .73 acre of the project site (Parcel B) for use as overflow parking. Required parking for churches is based on the number of seats in the main sanctuary. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church has 175 seats in the main sanctuary. Based on the current parking requirement of 1 parking space per 3 fixed seats, the church would be required to provide 54 parking spaces. The majority of parking for the church (72 spaces), is currently located on the north side of their facility at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Haven Avenue within a Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement. In addition, the church will continue to provide 8 parking spaces adjacent to the church not on the MWD easement, and 66 parking spaces on the project site as overflow parking. There will be no physical barriers between Parcels A and B separating the parking for the residential care facility and the church, with any parking issues to be resolved by the two separate property owners. Accordingly, the Engineering Department proposes a condition of approval requiring that reciprocal access and parking agreements be recorded either prior to, or concurrently with, the recordation of the final map. The table below demonstrates the project's compliance with the number of required parking stalls: Artis Residential Care Facility Parking Number of Beds Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking 72 1 Per 4 Beds 18 42 Shepard of the Hills Church Parking Number of Seats Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Total On- MWD Project Site Easement Site 175 1 Per 3 Seats 54 8 1 72 66 146 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 4 C. Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003: Per Development Code Table 17.30.030-1, residential care facilities require approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate in the Low (L) Residential District. The proposed 72-bed residential care facility will be entirely dedicated to the care of persons with memory-related disorders. Per the business description letter submitted by the applicant, the facility will operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. A total of 45 employees will be employed by the facility with 26 employees working the day shift from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 14 employees working the evening shift from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and 5 employees working the graveyard shift from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The applicant has also submitted a letter outlining the estimated police and fire calls- for-service. Based on the other senior care facilities operated by the applicant, they estimate that there will be approximately 3.6 calls-for-service per month from the proposed senior care facility. The proposed Conditional Use Permit fully complies with the findings of facts required by the City's Development Code prior to granting a Conditional Use Permit request as outlined below: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable Zoning District and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed Residential Care Facility is located within the Low(L)General Plan land use and Development Code zoning district. The proposed Residential Care Facility is consistent with the intent of the zoning district and the General Plan land use designation, as residential care facilities are permitted within the Low (L) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The facility is designed in accordance with all applicable development standards of the Development Code such as building setbacks, building height, and parking. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The proposed residential care facility complies with all related standards outlined in the Development Code including building setbacks, building height, parking, and landscape coverage. The project, though, includes security fencing up to 8 feet in height which exceeds the maximum 6-foot fencing permitted within residential districts. The applicant has submitted Minor Exception DRC2019-00465. The project provides two points of access from the adjacent public streets and will comply will all performance standards of the Low (L) Residential District. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: The proposed residential care facility will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties as it will operate in full compliance with the performance standards of the Low(L) Residential District. The applicant has submitted environmental studies related to noise, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 5 biological resources, air quality and greenhouse gasses that conclude that the project will not have a negative impact on the environment. D. Minor Exception DRC2019-00465: The project includes a request to construct up to 8-foot tall security fencing around the facility along with an 8-foot security wall around a backup generator. The maximum wall/fence height permitted within the Low (L) Residential district is 6 feet. The additional fence height is necessary to prevent memory care patients from wandering away from the facility and to protect/screen the backup generator. Development Code Section 17.16.110 allows for an up to 2-foot increase in wall height subject to the approval of a Minor Exception. The findings of facts below support the necessary findings, which are required by the Development Code: Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed increase in the maximum permitted wall height is consistent with the purpose of the Low General Plan land use designation, which permits complementary land uses within residential districts. The proposed senior care facility is compatible with the residential land use designation as it will be quiet in nature, has a low profile (single-story), and will not negatively impact the existing traffic patterns. The additional fence height is necessary to secure the open space areas around the facility and to protect/screen the backup generator. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The project site is surrounded by residential land uses to the east, west, and south and by an existing church to the north. The additional wall/fence height is necessary to properly secure the proposed senior care facility. The additional wall/fence height will be screened from public view by the onsite structure and by existing and proposed landscaping. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: The additional wall/fence height is necessary to secure the outdoor recreation areas and backup generator of a senior care facility dedicated to the care of memory care patients. Without the additional wall/fence height, the facility would not be able to properly secure the outdoor recreation area and the safety of their patents. Public view by the onsite structure and by existing and proposed landscaping. The security wall/fence along the west elevation will consist of 6-foot-tall vinyl fencing/gates topped by 2 feet of open vinyl lattice fencing along with 10 feet of the 8-foot-tall block faced in stone veneer to match the building. The height of the wrought iron fence along the north elevation will be screened by a 2:1 slope along with landscaping. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 6 district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The proposed additional fence/wall height will not be a grant of special privilege as the additional fence/wall height is necessary to properly secure the patients of a proposed residential care facility for memory care patients. The additional wall height will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the proposed walls will be screened from view by the proposed building along with existing and proposed landscaping. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee on September 17, 2019. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on September 5, 2019, at the Shepperd of the Hills Lutheran Church, with approximately 15 persons in attendance. The questions raised were related to the operation of the residential care facility, security issues related to the multi-family development south of the project site, and security fencing and traffic issues in the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant stated that the facility was dedicated to memory care patients and would operate on a 24-hour schedule, anticipating approximately 1 call-for-service per week for medical assistance that would require the service of an ambulance and/or the Fire Department. Security fencing (8- foot-tall wrought iron fence) will be located around the facility and will be screened from public view by landscaping and the main building. Loitering issues related to the current parking lot should be eliminated with the development of the senior care facility. Traffic issues are mostly related to Chaffey College and are out of the applicant's control. G. Public Art: The project is required to provide public art with a minimum value of $43,375 ($1.00 per square foot) based on the size of the proposed structure (43,375 square feet) or to pay the equivalent amount into the City's public art trust fund. H. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Low/Low (L) Residential District, which permits the development and operation of residential care facilities subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project does require approval of a minor exception to permit security fencing over the maximum fence height limit. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 7 infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption are outlined below: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Dudek; August 7, 2018)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. Trip rates were calculated based on the Assisted Living (254) trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Addition (ITE, 2017)). It was determined that the project would generate 187 total daily trips and 19 peak hour trips, which is below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Dudek; August 14, 2018)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project would comply with the construction and operational noise and vibration requirements with the installation of a temporary noise barrier during the construction phases of the project. Conditions of Approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval outlining the required measures to reduce the construction noise and vibration impacts to comply with noise level limitations. c) Air Quality: An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Dudek: May 25, 2018) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Pacific Coast Civil Inc.; July 18, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (TeraCor; January 18, 2019) was prepared for the vacant project site. The BRA concludes that sensitive plant or wildlife species, including any sensitive invertebrates, are not expected to occur within the area given the condition of the site and developed nature of the surrounding land uses. The proposed project, therefore, would not affect any sensitive species that would require further investigation. FISCAL IMPACT: A Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIC) was prepared for the project (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates; August 29, 2018), The FIC reviewed the projects projected recurring fiscal impacts and the estimated major City one-time development impact fees compared to a hypothetical residential project that would comply with the underlying residential zoning designation. Based on the projected revenues and costs after buildout, it was concluded that the project would have a recurring annual surplus to the City of$10,004, which is $26 greater than the $9,978 provided by the hypothetical residential project. The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent will also PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20034, DRC2017-01011, DRC2017-01003 & DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 8 be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The 2019 City Council Goals do not specifically address any topics that would directly impact the proposed project. The Housing Element within the General Plan, though, identifies several "special housing needs" within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Among those needs are housing for seniors and housing for persons with disabilities. This proposed residential care facility would help satisfy the demand for both seniors and persons with disabilities. The Economic Development element within the General Plan also identifies Haven Avenue as a major office/commercial corridor that should be enhanced. This proposed residential care facility will enhance the corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street and provide a high-quality development that will provide a complementary use with the surrounding neighboring residential developments. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comment/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Business Description Letter Dated April 16, 2019 Exhibit D - Calls-For-Service Letter Dated April 16, 2019 Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Comments (September 17, 2019) and Action Agenda Draft Resolution 19-68 of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 Draft Resolution 19-69 of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-01011 Draft Resolution 19-70 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003 Draft Resolution 19-71 of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2019-00465 � r v hepherd of the _ Hal s theran Church .. _ ► h+ler hi s• err � y�yyp � . Shepherd`of+th Hills i JIV dift Project Site fit ILA Ir � SOlutiOns� �, "�• ` - `,, 3 r-- P •••�— • • I T —PROJECTSITE L.._ _-art_ aI I I �•�7 S 4f; ; a LL4N1'AN smFfr � 4 1 ��,4.L I➢Clkk� � �. s {� I �rF PARCEL B -- 1 31,645SO.FT. NCMIN IAAP -_ --:------- I I 1 ! �v _ "ems•Y NTS. + _ 1 ,--___ �`{{ r aonrss ar.srN+,v..l lu[va Lurw,aswrw r�nr / I 1 II j fG`IG pi1FHSW { • ,. aC As#.nmc"aGftq smm{.vaw„rA.MLlr..H ''� 1 �� I 1 nC1'RC IP1gllM1wtra ltlL rla'ql arC.11 nIn4PL1 1 I I , — L.e.Lww avr+.rrnv r+c wuP wnx.s,rr.ru EASEMENTS: Ire i { ly TM1.~L mw.r wlLwwLr,oe,alrS r:�aa Pl.rnlR:.aro earaan� /�� lw.'+. .r 7 1 /csrr..nraxn,xrumNr.n.tnc,r>,+u[[.ctoNroa el ; r—- nu.r.el.n,Ix orr,rw prom, �) PARCEL A � � � I - nwre rnl.Yialvtr�u�x+4�luero�i N, Tli o�or rixri arem�io�w`t`'*x � ——T--�I 124,598 SQ.FT. � rxn.rrcl.tnacrr{wancoms TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20034 1 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING $Ww SIOP 72 lfP rnClltt 1 1 I 6140 RAVEN AVENUE RANCHO CUGWAONGA,CALIFORNIA 9F737 v I L .wal u Ir- r M1 r•w]uu•n rrH r N fltY•BOO NJ•o --- — t' ~CP.funmuarrnl.wl - � I uNrld S,r�Cl.w 1 e rrin LEGEND Untan _ Iw a.GwclLa��w �--�--,rw IILCPA-TI vniaf rrraartrvw C�M['Y ww wa sKw w fi[f w4,1.I �--�---� woe!^llr.,u rlrv.L.�K wl.r�•} wowr rw _..-— a.w�a Mw•.>r+l wo+ri.a n wu rOxri�M lw an1lN a..wrla..,.rwLla OVERALL PROPERTY l l.TeM � �••� r �[�� e w w r+.,xo w[•rlll wp1 w19 plpw 4:ye � ya1L�PL ,r/'ilvr' a1le R,fatlC. .I IL ull �i51 PROPOSED PARCEL AREAS PREPARED BY DEVELOPER. ,er...eue wUIL �..rivvr....Mvat wwrnw.w••e SCALE 1*-30' _ PARCEL _ e _ Bi r•elne ea4s7[nnL.INe. ARTIS SENIOR LIVING'new w� t—' aat e l�wuw.•aed aurrc:m �•'•' • ...w.u..v..u•�,• - 3F 6aS 4F#T o IWt gDLIEebQw Lp4p PARCfI B �•a wuu.0 atfol ry >r w 4` Ina`ale IaH,w w[itutw t2l=1 HLaI lle-elea i ZONING OPEN SPACE Cw rn ibO M Lb T — z b r � BANYAN STREET BANYAN 7-1- - ZONING r PROJECT SITE Drn--RESIDENTIAL LOW 6140 HAVEN AVENUE, i%--- CHAMPAGNE RD 1 _ � (2-4 du/ac) RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING m -.• CAUFORNIA91737 f-RESIDENTIAL LOW_. y` z (2-4 du/ac) rn F ! p r I -� Z SCAIE I'=100' r 1{1 —iA D 7 u N xo >I .. Irn v. D� ZONING z, - ....{z- .. m — Irn - RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM. rn KINGSTON ST rn (a i4 du/°c) SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ARTIS SENIOR LIVING — - ; — SINGLE STORY 72 BED FACILITY 6140 HAVEN AVENUE LEMON AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91737 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 614011AVEN AVENUE OWNER RANCI10 CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 ve�mn,kws �cst�u�4 ATN. 0201-821-51-04M m r..nn�E i Ki o.nr•e.00�+eow u,��s.,aw..u.i>i� �.ayt..�:o� �y"��4 'r,•�- - 51TG UTILIZATION FLAN - - _ ARTI6 SENIOR I IVINU J j i��aaraww a+� eaew..r�n¢o� wtt �rw } LEGEND AND SYMBOLS _J_-------------------- — .—'�—__—__—__—__—_.—.-.,...«� � I ` ' i �.—• -� cola Rna[ 0 psRaPfa[.�f��a.sx[rI ___ 9ANYAf1 STREET ___—_ 1 � --- — Yi51i x �-- _ y �f•n Sr ' c..ncu..ua � ..ronwl —.—.—nly.y,EO•.N!�K —I.la4![0 ryaf.nrya 1![ �I r. I I "�i� I i �r I—I I ! I I I _ ! I i # '. i � � - .r......,u..n•vr,.,a 1---II I w"f•-1 I � ABBREVIATIONS 1AI I I— I I i .c.[n •.ww.:t... •• w n � � cx+now / of r 4 = I• ...,�.. .wow. � x• w r r•��i� SINGLE-STORY f• I- •[lsna f SHktF■ I N HO,OiTiI YU' I— i • % tf efGPa[xury `1 I IPGNT OELINU1FON SfgwN KRION►+DIU1ES EMn"G —� I FF.1642 I I— I I I 90Ih GEINFAtION5fr0"KREON RPTACATES P►OPOSEOCOMI I PADr16013 ! I Txe !11} .ilt i PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN i ARTIS SENIOR LIVING SINGIE STORY 72 BED FACR1tY Sc r mm?ms =3D' _ CITY Of RANCI IO CUCAMONGA o 30 6o 90 6140 1 IAVEN AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 A P.N.0201-621-51-04000 OVERALL SITE PLAN �� r'�'r' "7. � �� •��•• '^ AATLS SENIOR LIVING w.�:^"r^.,::�++�.^.r o � �� .us.erw oeuxr.fcwry ,.N nn•a.mnrun —m—m— am - taw wCl[MI Y.TxIP! -------•'--------------------�_s—,..-.—.-.. ----- __- � ,'I� j c � -?ROJECTSITE ' =sl�; �J �• r� �14 H9 51'5Y E ——SEE SEr_TIQNS ON — Sa�EET C5 (TYPICAL) IIANYAN STREET 1 i -E. � . .� . . - . - . . '_ � Mans. •__•- r•s 6�'-�•�a I.laOV 7kR`I,•."`",- w _ � I m7r *. "i:j ~•ry}a I I PROJECT STATISTICS yr" `s •dry r/� JIr1 F.M1 •}I;•, , lmllnr+r ,=i ]s•,tles n u.1 l_07;i or,rtls pl„602.3.010111 Dnnl{ WSho I11H fO it __ ---- ____- I I r 1113I re,es.lw no sauon ' `- ems.-.,., S I W �� LOTtGtl,q nJV 1Qf1 RSV ' - =- '----_ •' -- --�.+ 3c * r II, •w , lanlr,lw(,Kiefl+p \ �--_ 7 f�fa rVUq pI,C[tfp leq II S/.Qs *j y v i rs funrlenfaaT r.luq sWr H r,nn•oLe•re• ;.r Tr ,J � I I wlrw+•coftwl +sr.rts wupn a.M lawn Rn•cl `� •-r's r � h. •z ![{! artr•.r .s.sH H sa n.n arcs 4 a 4 1 i YTIS rrh•q nddo ,111.[it L:pliHn n50n g11K] , Plsrle.rrelsw,rt>,IEefo n P el,q Y _ � �I . f. • T •� � [HR„r,Wq MR.SLs raty 10.5,•n n [ raw Innwf -- .nA]rlfT•rWralea..loraT,anpaer B U LEGALdESCRIPTION: BENCHMARK: � pl1y�r '0 - �1 j1y, T 4 n,ve`�� =.ar r.n. I.I..a_ ,s I...>,,��+,•aycw:,rv.. —VJI r1�-I •� { , C . •..1. I C�•[J 1 / Ih i'' c - t�YM tYi�w.c\ •'uwa_,�iM If...r.a9 fniA � y r ' C.1a. 1� L.1-- Y",/ 7 • 1 �w..... Ile • •1- .. n �rll �q -_ _+Or T I P I I ' ^hl}p�!_'],��'e f 9ASISOFBEARINGS: I � � •, �L�� A� Si-IELTER I i .<M s.rw.nLn� wrl...srl+.raw•,se.i.se..uw,�». _ _.rr ..�' •I I�-x�ry r �. _ Ca"* ', I %� I I I i FLOOD ZONE NOTES. ..,..+, CONSTRUCTION NOTES:ON-SITE - �narofsosoaorsc SEE SHEET CJ SalslGEDLOGIST: OWNER: UIILITIES o-tO+41kC11+C prllr.l 4nOrwpnr l[II.l nfws �pIIRUIS PU�,i4{laUl[Y+ IIAi.„a U5061n1 AK yaflarOa TN raaf ILL[l Y',fY SWfNIIIC4ip1µ F311S0+, 11usISs-+Sst w� �M��k+ ]o---Cp 411K1+'+C pnA S'•l lAvfi rwgklldS,E1011 1(.S�@rsllu[S[prlln[YrIwOOUfRInf el,MlplL:• -`• IUO kLHn wF fV1[Iq«•�•'� Cr+:O1411K1a'[1M k1 IX14,p1[s g-L7JrTIKTsIur nA Slx4Va nM+ A„+QIO NC4g14�Gnrlr ,aa�rr,unm 1•a4•rr.1•Ir cabrsscrcwlcnncwraamvwmalalu o—_ r,laru.Lr>vc """ r1'••Irys�1W CONCEPTUAL o-Cp4lAUClef?Krrte lrsn+p 1,ke pli,LrPlu �nalO6FOs.LE.rwer nl:rrCu,.Olsn pw.tL p.,{ ,yrpraa paf .uA.11.>Zm wacc.maswms nrwmc•n,+l•++Icrsn.r. C3—nLlns/o r..1..•.walnrsns.c st-+ n.l.lsra O-imnq\Vr)Wllnilo-f-+ norrneare.A GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN aG—eprsrrucl nask efrlwLae newc,rrlm klr+ � norouo,r r,u noneila++uu,Lr•1Mrorp Ya[ '� �''F w•nl ewy,wn+r.•ilr...iH orrrin L•wlrl.+enr p41kICT a 3r[C LML.o u}•1141n K W I,D kllcu Hrdt (�-[prnnr.mklm,eonlen lblll ARTIS SENIOR LIVING � ,(}.alut+n val+nr uumm k.rl EARTHWORK QUANTITIES e.w[*• vecrrw a//lan-.Ts'ec\nRrr+fll wnA/o rl...a+ C01�61R11Clgll lT01[5 OFFSt{E ,�! r - � p41kKTi,'L,.LI[n K1e++r,nOGYa siOb•ta•NIInl I+1111 ,e..-[..,.•r up+ReWM+1+4.+.tgrrs �1sI NsINI SINGLE SLORY72 SET)FACILITY kAIRa[+SiLL■rlafnfl[rFel wlaLvu(rR w�rN nw I. r rwl IUM v. .. ,,. g1CY µuanalM ,(}—emrrl�nornlen w•m at i,nwr, ,�. •' — - ( 161rgC1r•aML„lOL'+IraawrRrolsuMl , , wean mgmrRtl rll l•,.nN CITY OF RANC1iO CUCAMONGA Q-LNiI d vnurar•rrar+ _ �'=-In++.lerr,un.fer,.urnwn - _ . „,'.�;, •+ ++-. _, .- -,-- reuse ..YnKw+c=•y ,-sl•lnsn- 6140 HAVEN AVE:NU(: ( m wwrne rtoneen�+ -nlwrnft,it-twof. - •-- RANCI{OCUCAMONGA.CA91737 I(}norovo ulnll•nA .I, ��,,., y, - .. .•.+,......,,�... v. .. �ra,cnn w.uw.•n.wofc.rl.+crm'stn.+ A P N 0201-821-51-0-000 �rn rxr,aiw,rtnworlre LEGEND w,. ^""'�'�" -,rarl+ao frI r',111 I1t u~ @----- „.ane�..ur,\.,wc. �un:l,el.ul.a kl•Inaecrcr.0 n,+l ` ,rl l+.11rlero g'.• r$ GRADING AND DRAINAGC PMMR.+�llnrtu snn+lamfunnlfsa\rn,.1SCALE I• 4Cr AR715S(:ANIRLSVSr:1i IH1 qa Mf100/IWO r,�w+w ig •a�w` - �.,` wm...r nil BANrx+51MI tt lean 4 I le.o 1a30 37 ap 3r I Ie30 1 lam + I M f�l la2o I e 10 SyEgE SEOn 1610 Il 1. NU �Wl]• 1] Ie00 k _ �,.I. Ia00 I- 15i0 _ 1500 emn4 I500 Eo n"•�+ 1580 SECTION A-A t IHVTNAxNUE Iazll 4 1620 .. PROPOSED I a� lelo k 5a1LaE.von v .r .r lalo }f•• fI.1YQE Y•D•41013• k Mk 1lOD 1 1 1600 1590 k I 1500 + 15a0 lsao SECTION B•B Ewnw Sf>zFEi e # IaaO p• ( j 1a.0 1630 37 I 33r 1 1 1e30 } 1 leao �I Ie10 .�' • I I leoo � r 1e00 J, YeFE6c 1590 15e0 ISao SECTION C-C g t nAVE>s Axr+uE lam I670 — - �•- UOl>f4� 1 M4 a.• ar 1a10 1610 SECTION D-D • PE#4317,CK2512 1 2 HORIZONTAL&VERTICAL SCALE 1 2.'- PER e401.3 CITY OF RANCI10 CUCAMONGA 6140 HAVEN AVENUE RANCI10 CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 .4 R A.P N 0201-821-51-0-000 A oxsr ems i.c. SGCTIONS St#IOl Lmsei Yor rml Yti w�la d w`• �+ N51010W nic,Ih10 o •M MCjIYI Y�7]I01 �.`.. �. � �• 9r-et=sue +-+W=gym_ y PAVEMENT SECTION 1 2 CONCRETE CURB 6 GUTTER 3 CONCRETE CURB 4 CONCRETE CHANNEL 5 CURB TRANSITION 5 fGil np.�FFYu,vp.aa.,1.t)odOC �,_« �QDUAM ...+MII•w1,f.1R'YIWIlGF1lt IYut»..a.R IttEF errr,.t'W'a•d I I't Iv'.l1! Wy1[TRIO �� •+r�. • • t r.]Oafs 1 1 1D..N. �tF 1f%1111p1 R/IIU t,ay.uFa arsl,rw �I1Fix SIR YeOF lusnul .rr..... r nerwlonr O.1 'rl F�io'.li f�lM Ya}�If,OE/M � - FIB �� BERM SECTION !wd p!M•YfV !Yo��unf Y96 t 12 CONCRETE STEP OFF 7 TEMPORARY OVER EXCAVATION DETAIL B COMPACTOR AND TRASH ENLOSURE DETAIL KDBUItDING PERIMETER SIDEWALK d CURB I D STENCIL DETAIL I E The Maxmr IV Dranage System Detail And SpeclFicatk ms 0�r6�trlrsie FLDGARD® Catch Basin Insert Filter nt Q Im+.OwCM®IO 1 f•wlf Yl..lr WC.w�.c 1 cnraOm4l Wlat.aRO,rEq _ — — - .t.w�*w�wws► yI[-n wodYiihYwi,Y.lY - irt TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION X - •O.wlOr w.h.S.c E 1a1111F•111EfO1,11CMi . t F...IUMNI!wb.grr...•.i.li./ �•W � �� *' :"�"]�'j I.{.alJi NI.L.O ww F.wr. t = w I __ CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA 6140 MAVEN AVENUE 1W YILfiFa.A4tUMl..,Ii.4al. ' ne�.0lw,lYp..l.!/ 11 FLOGARD CATCH BASIN INSERT AANCIIO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 :o.•:..mo.o.wa,• ,a]Y,.....t,�r+.,,r,,,,, .. APN.0101-621-51-0-000 FalUOY[Iw11K�W.YIw�A•HiIIM1 "'► [r,..o,.>_f,[ •.l,..,u..uli.�•w...ou.r. ✓"` � DETAIL SHEET n raYl Y6l u•.tm..n[w,Fs,.I laowwa w.un r �i _ row rewn®n aa,an.l w,oais+ n.....1. THE MAXWELL IV DRAINAGE SYSTEM AllTLS SEt:ImR LIYIA4; DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS 12 ` ..w -u-•�z- NON-STRUCTURAL SCNIRCE CONTROL BMPS --- _ —_ — The MaxW1er IV Dranage System Detail And Spea malions Y MUY[E[S ril• IRCUri,rd Hdllh Ow,EK ll,wnS!uO IXCVwnt BANYAN STREET '/ , rura.aa...d>✓,FLrs.r Yvr,C� n rr ,n• wOKY1 rwMW.Ern r1Sr14YI1wGa00R IG'h F w +y r L ter. .. ,N• RrrwVRFW,[E rurrw srrerr -F liti'Fi !.w.lxa ww...e..•w Hunt � E ,n• mu xicu�a �� 6•fl]YJ- •,X[1[f,r9,.Wr9rIKE»,••<[Kr[ ! W 1f)C4,rrrre OYWrT OHY•uKICPW»K1: mw --fOlrhlY �` „' Raclarrh�OlKr� F�10. l�drCln �....MwaH• naou • [� Fc}„ _ ^ •�i,a.i..m:r"_ ¢ ��rP�.s ss.mwseMotue eoalll.rrn WI ."r .- I vw�..nu"'I�o�n�YnnYvr'�v ~ uru�'mn�F 1M'errlw.•E�aoorsUA J h '�' ri• l.norte n...a n11• ralurorwedl6•Lla UIX,a(.w50,r.,r r.•nawoveo-t! I `•-�r--r^r--�`-r.�`rr1-•' �r`f'• r •' • r.erewww.awworyw �u.• Wer•[wrrrmmarrllmm wrwdoo.u.+.i ;,.-.xd �`- �„y� // ,�?!/ ;/ 7f�11 3�j � �. � nss• ..cuws»Ilrwx.snswa..HralaH _ / S LO...nr[.MlnuWl.,OnP1! y� H11' CRMIIUr.SIIlAlU4MLW.RSIp MrC.R4R,r911Ci3 • rl'Ir�.(rrr� / I�, !- � Q � � lu:' CO»rl•.P„4l OrNr.HST.-M[r.9[InH.ti Cau. r r,r�iralv��raa..nr®Mu GG W ;;; �.,„��,,, STRUCTURAL SCrURCECONTROL8MPS i •Maw-rrro®es,r�"me rdrJ:»r.rrm Ys• nou srou,wrr snnYST»ara.ra srer.et ' ,• /' _ ~ Y h.'IY*. _ 11I ¢ t •rsewrrm.ctlerta Icrla.lww,woor sG.l>f I imnaro..oaa.e........Q fi u• etw•.r4ocarn,Hr7 asnnoa wrnnasrol.�a wKronwce i./:-/• ,W q launss..rttoa�-Jorlcaawrwaoo.so.sn +�_�� ^. J{// �- 't� �/' �� $ V• pllC lwa[pTrrl,Cl1R,Llwaw,SR YIp.•pi 4l.tlnHfxK7 / l r. r�- � J Y1 �,///�� j •�.rl. I iu0.0•rm O0•r m.,®t�' o riOlISlllal.rt100KTa11USd Mr MapOOLIr>!71 y{J�.��'i.•� © 1 - -• 1: � r�� 1 I gmlvwa hC wi�r. N' 1Rtln[.tln.tl'YI Icr floou wQSUnuMha //JJ 1 } kVk1 J_ f ovwrriwaM Ml ft 1d11LLNr 11nWY1eCE1 d COIWhalgrl lr.YllianlgllK VOfOUCF[Onir0. _ �. = ram' •.' nlwa.r•�iM!'�..i • •••w.nrei+1 ] Rr.,er.q r.cnel w�t11GVE apw2t. ••�/•, .1�� •'s"•�i:I r�now.•��.a w.'�'cc,1 .. k ulwvwrpoor w.�r1 u• n�rro p+apwoxna.tw F r 1 l+ { •h '< �' 'm s:• �owauoa uw,c,un,rv,rwEroorswn ;_•Y Y +: • '1'-*•�� WOOL ' � -"- �.or.r Hlln�K[ee,rsr[t - rice.el.+ra r..�.em.Erwsi» _ -_-,._ TREATMENT TREE - _♦ 7I `'+- -'-• S[7kq{L{4rlrOt •.��raralsa+.er.r aoa INK .»�rrn,raa..r... • -� .'. ' r FLCIGAItD+PLUS CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER /.• •/. - J ' �• .,, � ,y.� tads v.lr m�'i.ni..r.u.H,»e!r» 'nn.,v..cirl,,.:[n„ao-.!. »ucm Yrr».a iEmmrownwr 4a..nw,r Y.rnnw,cl -d • t.' / ]+E OF rr,reran , o..mra»rr.. ssa..,va w.e o.wsa,rn rrn llsw.srY rrr.ar.0 MWC..O."m.m ounr.h w ..Co TriltMi ntrFV•RN *-AI{Ifµ1[RFISCt.HI"�R •'�•��_ _ MJl[.11xDRraFa vv,us,.vn r�rnnt i.rwr• n,r '.r.�xw nrkO /.Clwlpdflfti,Eoaw dcl nlvtY LIr eF"-'R rut ru narrvv.rnna••r raowwEr.+c., '\ _ _ rlveeTorn .� • „� '-* {,. �-rti r�[n6A' n mi1Llva ,r,,,rrw4Rr,ncmraswuar M1rla,.lompro.owa4orauonanE .r fYh Ywidl ,t,eFNr, THE MAXWELL'N DRAINAGE SYSTEM DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS IAr JEd71-14 r, 7 C05 UNIT LOnG r 17.1E-3e R7 f i` uyn[rw,n •arpnwt r.m osvrn [LE,I.rEC r4W�� tr([p1 SrSlW frau4H uuna EC wKr,rE[lS1M T�F•Lfl Ortulu HYo".rrrc! r,.rr.w.rencTanvrolEor nrrd!•eCtrn¢nrvw�o vrrlo.vE7 rkti AWKMILDRYWELL Catch Basin Insert Filter ,wnnwrc! 4'+♦r ttE!„rrt 0•-- -+r•..••�•••n•--3 ~' VWp rFMarnl,t l4rr fl»rEl i m.grrr,m ecrem„arras rJatloom �� rwWrn.4R4rr.R gls`c.rsras e+v"E+*:oem....r-- r _ m�M1 STENCIL DETAIL rnrlolwlo»v[,rtrwrQrmn4rp srpYw.nlrH.rYnn te+rlla p,er _ LIM1MFrn Vpr M t11GH!p!R[N+rrt NIr K.M _ Te— rl•.+w ,y - + ---- --- srBOL 7G B 7 J FTFR O K FUJ:F u-m ew CATCH r rtpvNlIrG!n[rl1l.4Ora H,JCs or aC!flsuwoO irrY la nYlatlP ar Al EANG rlOrlMdaf lvO.rE.Y(,rwWYMn n[rrn rQ lrrol r n4Morm+mIXl[P1vMar)f,c5\,r[pw!pr4lsd M _ LEGEND CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN i1Ae E K[stGl75 A[OWAR FA RF' ARTIS SENIOR LIVING .... I •� •'�•��.•�'� O SRJar'sr17RY n un iACRIrY CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA Dw+aGFUFwpamisur SCALE f'-off EO ,, 1 614011AVENAVENUE RANCI ID CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 A P N 0201-821-51-0-000 �,. , .•arrc awn a"l.�»c» _ I - •«...« r 1NREu^MIN ARY WATER QUALITY MANAYrENENT PLAN ARTIS SENR7R LIVING uwra n t7to, .�,-{�IIh.Jilr'i .. ___•._.v...-.... �� .__.- _ ___� -• .I�I�^ IHIR.a eAr+vw sr+eEer � ., n,.ue of pr�vr..em •i �'. Y�11I pp� k. r `i t 11• I — I I- I LEGEND _ i 4 reOlVTrrl t{.Y •,wir , FF.IW2 E. PAD " 1 �I PAD•16019 t � � I SCALE I' 30 ;ice a-t w- n• , • +ay p..cin I; Ir w 60 so .E " CONCEPTUAL { r FIRE SERVICE SITE PLAN ARTIS SENIOR LIVING SINGIE 51ORT 72 BED FACRITY CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA 6140 HAVEN AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 1f'N15 BE I"ACCOWMa WITH AP.N 0201-821-51-0.000 FH+Oq ClICN.�ONC.A f-iE 0l5IF1C1 StuEpARD S-! *r•• ;.':'.."...`."":..`"`.•n':,^ CONCEPTUAL FIRE SERVICE SITE PLAN �..y.S«�w.T" .- „' ..cum •nwi 5 JI n IrI •� 'k vxoPoseo SINGLE-STORY r4n wrnk r.ororne TU' _ T7 T(D i�ptn � FF.1607 PAI).16013 s __Tt lJ SCALE I• 30' C_""'11 "�"y _ CONCEPTUAL -----==--------------------------- CUT/SILL EXHIBIT ARTIS SENIOR LIVING SBiGIE STORY n BED FACILITY OWNER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w C10C "O°`°• 61401IAVEN AVENUE f.,—m6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 A P N 0201-821-51-0-000 T._ CUT/FILLEXHIBITR ARTIS 51:.411fIt LI1'I1'C. -V QD1/t'IO+'�d0 IIIIk11F \ •! - ,• full L �•! or ■i �rY ! XI EMEND u as ■� ' red ..�, � ��+�♦ �� ;1 Its Fl - .�jA6t�et�et � r g r k -ri�r ... A ® 4i7 er E - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — BANYAN STREET — - — — — — — — — — — — a + EXISTING BERM architecture incorporated numM, e u - I 7 [ I Al { 90 L � At �, �, •,. -,• r � � I Q '� I n...a •.00-u I Id A REVOOM I i, I I t r I' • I � I I r Lerinnnvar �OMETIM a! t S i PHOTOMETRIC PLAN — _ AS1.2 M Z- Z- 7,7 9 M..". �f-- L SIDE WALL TYP L 'w— O BOLLAROL�;'�-1 WALL TO FLOOR DETA149ki 6 f- 1 1. DUMPSTER WALL V. TYP GATE FRAME ELEV.--;-= DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE O DUMPSTER ENCL FRdWELET- 0 Fla NOTE:REFER TO SHEET A2.0 FOR o=j E ce 11 EGEN WALL LU U) I" U3 Z2 ix Exposm cm Pw lruw GENERATOR FRONT ELEV $ "�-+ °o�'E 42D /th SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATES DETAILS 77 7, ........... ........... ce AS2.0 (§.G"RATOR SIDE ELEV 10 EM GEN ENCLOSURE - ',! ,s architecture J r incorporated tot r-r¢tnto+u . ............. .. _. I .. . n.+..I ....: 'r.r - �. .. :� �» to A .............Ir Y.O y�y +• _r C)CA $ Cn - Flrd 17YIYCF a I•.f �n.ro Art { mil. • - M�—..-.��, 1STFLOOR PLAN a ...... ...........f..... , - 1 ....... - - -- --------------" = A1.0 { Ii{{t architecture O ELEVATION-NORTH incorporated 1nmrporated. R taro IfaIERUE IEDEIIO F.ro12"Jallrll fl•CpICREIE RDOF IAES IIAIAIf ACfUREA:BQIAL SAlORY 100 SLATE 0011111'.SIO1E EQIRIAN BIEMI 111 Wl1'CEEtFIrlyER SCPdrEs�•�.YV111FACII1RIll _--_—_—_—_—_ -_«.�_t_—_—_---_—_ — ------------ _- - — —___—_—_—_--_�_-,v..o61JAlESINROE WADISAN�CLDM YELCCE.oR AUrUAN rAM —_ -- T W CEIEENIISER SE1P16 iEI/DSI111E-RVMIlFFL7111gR: urwia vary. JAIES HARDIEIWS]AWl1 CEDAR FAE CULMv' MOCK BAD— WC"CEIERI!!ER SRIE167'E%f VBViE Y4NFI4G11R1ER: t•E — - q�,'�'J+�IE91NROIE MEROIRANt CEM/I IA♦L CQ�M1►ElIILfAEi } I WCtE1E1Rf&ERTMS4.AFWfCCM PWPIS UAWPFAC111RE JARE5�M~H-""I" - h-�CCIMIARCIIC wNiE BrIWRfAGiURFD SIDNF•LLDORADD SIQEIWEL BL1Ff EIOIE fd.OR PIILSmrI BS E]D'CBED TRUSS Z RM USEp Ol a MT USED O ELEVATION-EAST wwlu E G DSE 3 L+ 11 WMoIUSED 0 Z Ir CAST SICH6 SE4 EIANIl AC LWW NOR&STC ECaOR. N 8 sAl1BD1E 11'SfAXOP10•AE1lRL 110OF EWRFALSIREA:E141ER1, cc MI ._._»_» ------- --- ----- -- --------- — ----- ------------- PS - -----------'fir, UOML SERAIM WE .PTO III111F�� Ir cumm FIKR SHDQAS-LL~AC1 W ER J"S WYAM EDGE PAMEL G0.0R SYO$1pE 6iEdE 110EEE111 F6ER OOU'U" 114.1 I1P8■ fi 5E1LV1rEDw[OD EGEA►wC RAti.[}ILVXiACCLCA: E -- PO�KUIUO[i S1RE:1'E CRAFISAWFPArfE COlpI: YrW fo99rE wh E - 'J0rEg14SAREUSrEPASAA4W0FDESIGM Y YARE RlULVDIFS EI,p,Ecr roclAur.ElaRAA'RpYED[OA4L R O ELEVATION WEST — — — — — — — EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS p — — — — ol+., wJD o-er a d q0 ELEVATION-SOUTH .u 7 _______.___..__._ k f architecture i e ® chitechitectd ldullw y incorporated .w 'I { CD p Z Cn�i Inc# �p E Q � rmr u j�_ p 9 Q a t pp� 1ma ?i BA ReWmn ROOF PLAN i ru i i i ; 1 I 1 ^I I.yatlly + I wv wtp 1 , �.� 1 1 architecture --------� O SHED ROOF FLASHING DETAIL incorporated rincor oraled ti+.mn :�im.nam Roof Cross Section vwv�.r..rn. w.rsue u.m.aYt.er. .V4V.uOwY .ylyupntRtr CP�4 V W.V.wl.l iyp M..WM •4/Ywl Yt u.u1 W.MO.NtYluln i ma.M1 llHlo. .(}.q CPlytiw i . •...I VM1Ii �nyY1F% r w.M1 rt.eG.0ril.Crpr .lp�nia .CV wU•w..��w S w. [Eyrl..q. "s U O FASCIA DETAIL U) s__ppp t w a .wl...wnrw ...�cn uua•wr.n F.we 11�■ F 9 0 ROOF CURB PRE ENGINEERED ,pos is 11 .� _ Rl44K+0 R y RooFOETaILs d k.. awewa p^. W cwa,.wJp S .6 r -- - -- u MT t architecture Incorporated �Iw n.....w_ln„ ,.r01NtMM Fw 1W]k/Flll OSection 1 w —_—_—_—_—_—_—_— _—_— —_—. Z S A E IX go OSection 2 MAU&NJAMM oz SCY'.TC M'CONCIEIEROOFTNA M~ACTkMERBORALSAxCm -2 Uj q WGSAIECO� SIONEIFOIWFAMSIENG C U) To W CFlR1R FMM 5109FO r EFFOSIIRE.MWFIIFAMMUI AAIES NARPE NAI�.SArEI CEON WLL G0.P1 AWIL.M rW SM CS MI FMR$*. rE"DSW-IFWFyFACIWER_ .uc.rNRC1E rURCIFk1FEt CEDAR fEl.CdOR:11�OCO5IOG BRDFIM IQC'GEIIEMIi HUlSPIDrEw IO OLOk M%ALO - JAIES,FARDIE NAFMVW.I CEPARSRA CCi1Rk FEAK CRkr p� Ilmm Cr CELMIT FSER TAM SA M AT VFNDDWS AND ODORS LLll1RzcLOw ACTIME:AAAES IkAIOE IkARCI,RY'aIOO,N Is„N/ 1OTb19 ANG[G WMfE '" M•WM/ACIt/IE9 S,OIE.WFIFAC,WER.FFOCRADO SFO E"F SrUE mDR:MMSrnri R a E1w�ED rRDss — — ®3D VIEW-BUS SHELTER 99 low USID HIS IR NOT W" semlusm SECTONS w ��"+ �r r wrgl USED ... v.. asp. 51D1E CdOR. 11'SIN01165IJW FFFL F,COF�YMARACIOIrR LM RI COLOR:pA 1 UODELSERES AIM OR:RED I .k` YY + ' 1l CEFEFFIFEkRy�iIES FWAi AGiWER:JA4E51M14E n I E EDDE VAFrt1 CaDR SAFr7S,OFrt atOE P$q. �I �YY 4 nNOF USED Su. rir•u�! r IF CEiIMI IEIER QiIILfF c— W � Ir SaAlATEO M'OpO SOLEi 1Y0 RALNll1.WRFACFORER: f f �- -r � evRc,m uoDEtstrEE.iNE Gx.FFswnrwR>.man: WHRE - ._..I..___...._»............................. ....................... i WAMWACAWUS7Ea4S49AS;SCFE+ESE'vJi rFEYARE A3.0 € O ELEVATION-BUS STOP FRONT qO ELEVATION-BUS STOP SIDE O BUS SHELTER PLAN susEcr rocMwlEFU9AArRDYkOEDUAt r.ro r.r r.r A� SG7«�TI .5 v 1.. A �LrLr raw /r ti � T .,� .:�� ..ice .,+ :i• . �. 7 _ �1 DECORATIVE� '� "��[�� a :�4=�j ry�:�.•`ram-e`er- ,' . �+• _ �' }'L. ^fir �� rya '.. �. � _ 4 + 5Fi _ 'rs� i•' L <<<�r•'1�� 4 7,�5 ~•/ �5�h.,* i ..].r,. _-� �I' rye` , � �Y {ti.i. � 1�'1, h. � +r � �a�Pt<t;ti ram' + Tit '� l��, '��i �•� T.7' - - � :::r ry ■ / r WA INIMWA - 16 'f�•.lanl {t� '{�'{asa. It1 ft leer fa'{ 'f.:y fl; —.ar_ '�1! ..,��1 s—f7ti= III r EL OM .49 irl(�Ir-nmr �°f 11 � 1� Y'i .■r•�=.!' � .S,. - iliiw� sipggrr�� it r III�' ��:1 um r �" fll.li [I:1 t ,.a• 1 F:�` �1 Ia0 �Q PQkrQ��:p/�i��'i i:i�� I rrav � EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN BANYAN STREET BANYAN STREET EMT NP•ERY ; Zia i."Oi•.' 90.E .m.A.9.r.+.E ca.la..... F J T F' 4 --F ! .. _ .. • .u.wwa.r w.R To E w .IA. 1 r wrx+.saaw �� .trorvrntrc T '.�..� :.. - a �•�. — - - .� a __ - •�`�,�`' �.� ten, wr nat.a sxu.,Rres 6TrE tdErwP 1,—T ALPIOdIPL—tME WTAA .P— to VW Pye.wpto, •—nK�FT.W-t > � POTTERY SCHEDULE in,,.. .. a wTwl To 4NPF P.PIIrEO Lit KH PROPOKO TREE G SEP{}•TTPEI.CE I to Rum P,RR.0 tur .i'iNl PROTCCTgIf RARY� tu W I . OTE tIGI m ' rtETNEN0TY42 ' Q t•u•O �WiM1,G11I4Ri=+10[•. fR4w�VlF PPq.TO. [� f Uj 1 _�_T_timryE E�•I.c z Na1MPPEi11lfElt '�T +} '. ..�. T -.Y'••• �•t-L. IOHOPI R�4IIIfE G LU �IIIIIIIJI .r...•�.•.to l -� y .. ! :�M • .. wJ. rE�+!. TO SIWf?N IOT �- a .. ... �- �+ Y" •�7� �-� _ ris -. -?i.�,:,+ C7 P�P�PtKEE- WF = ` %.,:<t,•[:l.C' - _ [q yNSE PAR,aQLOT 1 I V IVrI 'I f _ EA•[r.o[GEES z tJe21Y,0 RTEl4Nl L 1-0 n __ E.ana GlRTA 1� x7 = � 1••-1 C+ 4 f a W e c7 .v.trt aEc PENCE - +j y 2 i. 1 S 7 ;:- • T O<zTAW— ib4P.I RAEL/1R[S r.' ' AE1rLLNRX[W4LRNFORAA4TgN I Z ti..]LSF .• + a1 TO PAA' ,OT �'.., yJ �• PARr.tl Lot 1 W1 t- . -+ - "� �calllt rIkQCx LI=O K= \�—�6 ACtlow EPAEt 1�... 4.f Rom to ARCI•KPr3 RAVE EoR "TG•ENUMS ` '- D NG STORY _ o[CW.TNEPWU . rRoPoEEt,•us ANP,Ag1E9 ; 1[y[ 7 AC ITY "" h� o an"ta °w Tr - p4tt" u.w►.nT.«EaxwTnonrranwnn. �1 s,. LI0 IN.K1 SECtIRRV FENCE WFORY4TIDN V rL :\ P 51fJYfSE WMrfM 4 1YIISPL I P 16Q1 3 wn 1.,T E tA.oxut stREt..P rao.l wrT.0 `.m fXlst.A rR[u -� } ART OIx MI PRMATT AND STREFT'4** I Msr.4TIM S I - .:lKx Ano"IlAcmaM .REiPM aig1. EC1'I ItiN.SPORE.ORE APN• La1E 020s-82 t-51-04)W _ FALL PROTECTION RILING RIFO 1' r 1' f ra,.P.n.Tw iin.r•. IlrrolsurwP wiN - - I Sttt•PL. •. riCTL[]MII SPACL I WTI_ wwl.n wrTRut. TtlR•111 aTEn ` PARIQ a- 'i ,'.wr.•. '.rxw • ! - P[i FR TO A.Cw1Kl71EArlsioR MORE rVi,RW1411 .E•w�t•. H '. -'+ + .� • _H1i' LU PARKINGLOT SHADE TREES 11 I 11CPRR•iED 11R[E ]PAR,.R68TAUS VV"*4 PATH '— W (.PAR..d S1AtL3-3• ]•tGEE] 3AT.s.t - -- i• ` .• r � .-. .1 �w E Q •uarwosrwrn[� rrrri�r�� i ��I.—.T� _ r , _ z -.sF7A. id16"rA6CrKE3 Rr. E.rS1r.PPERUMER— _ Lu Rr RY l.c .•+;•er E PLANTING DEPARTMENT ACCESSROAD -Dj PLAN E NPRO/. - ,A $ e I! ».. 453U * rA�Ir16.IIAIR1PPMl. VA,.IP,REEt . •.L,� x... F�RmtTecar..ruKn tCCA�Kp PLANTING PLAN _ .wF.T rO Rt WY. Rgil.rnl.4,- ryAR RT C,YY FIIG•TEFR SEE L-2 FOR PLANTING REFERENCE SCHEDULE SEE L4 FOR HYDROZONE PLAN S WATER CALLS PLANT SCHEDULE ARTIS RC P I/�/uss�� cm LLDTAW-AI I CGWAO NAM COrt pn LM RELKS VvW-f SPAL*R CDDE IOIU tCOY1gNNALL LONT On REIIMKS L�� MITNE MEMt,'4FW IM,IATNtLL�iM• 1•lc. • tm AL fICPl1N fow W'�iCn,O'9 iy Sp• 73 Lm t sl.N.e•NE.s 4 or WIANIC•L'COLMDIL N.Nc CONT 3PACr Cn RELLMNS Destltit. 1�1arrC.S Mp-13 More.'Wa 11 3.— Xt.• T LPW ,J L•Iw2 •{LT ArthiLrnwr iLS E17 iwYc.pw.a[A/1 lTw fpM i•Lly. iw 'p7•J LTm 31wra Y..t .r 2L, yCLgy R 2nrm n L,Nl $C A,EFMM K+..+.•L.I�..rIYrL NT.. L L.DO !n nLJ Ai1L1Ll�jq-j IL Ir1.2+1 r'iY LAG LLJS LapeTYv.u.'LhMn/. . iL.iW ir,..tlF Op Dp TL3 ROT..f—LIP..ArE.Y+ wwi t•.,.��Trrw�T�r //'�� LapllRa. 3w If'•t Sn LKL /rr�r/rrr— LA4TLq L ...•K... fGP L.�Ca.I f+r+-9 Tiw 3•Lo, . LUO STREET TREE cRaLpocoYrns cmE wTr,r.aL•Lxuw.� CDNi •P,AfyiO Dn pLLaw,u Tu ALE n.e.....anlr rLadao AL..I r1•.ar ri.. 2n m. 3 LIOp 0 STREET TREE CERThI c.�.,w..,...stews.... ue Isot .LPl um a,p.LLuc OwMIyNM fCpJ I..O.11rTlw •Rm 3 LVW aIC LE Gror—I.."a.. 2— 2. LOW Lr.p PM LIIm.,i•K...wrw:h.•.9 L•TNcriw .a Mot 2L N6 LOW PARKING LOT TREE //�7 R.0 S1M NK•uwoo.lA•r iL S.�Lf 2.Tr.. N LOW ROSOW RwwrwuL. P.O.t.•w iLlwr Rww+T .I. ,L'•t iLG' LW. L L LLll 7fl11 LA—,a I—(—IT— E. 3p2.• L• LOW r►T V PARKING LOT TREE TuSM T„IwkA—~ Twa G.7118p CODE BUr•I.CAL 1CpWpx M.L� CDNT DTY m—s hN f^1 UCEACON am. w LOW > t CiSNLD Lalrf+l. Pi--t&W"x.n.a. Sw IStow 0-4 c.spm OYR.p.w....IOrtT..wW.Lt Lw 173 LOW pin rws o•.r...J.. 11Y -C R••r Lp1 Iw 2u Lim O ozz0 a 0i5€f A.s w. !W Iu Llm r,�a N9 cu J 3e,N PAr A/16t ppyyiCWl.+f 4F RyR fw r• LOW o C �u uG 1E2 tq.w..r.eo..o..T— rw,l./I+..., .Sw ,. Leap L--L z I. LA TEp L.,M1 M—'T•,r ri'1—rn.,w 3 w 111 L.00 PLN PIa P..—e.oui.n .L LOW APN: FHOL7W ,wp—pLA"QW ILw2•..L.Ilrb- sow 222 LLOO U2U1-821-51.0.400 /rrrrrrrr� w PIT wp ,34 mm . aa.n olw. I••7im. T .L 1. - frNpfRvrr�l-VV.-N TyTlllpp.NT.T.CUWv, 13w .L LIDO R RJn CLA 3w 3.T ROS•3 ft—ft .L LPL rk.—g Rw. so" ,L LMd TEUCNA TrcurOlrO.. Ir-r.N.dr to. I* LOW rrrirrrir� • TM 3•f Tr.tlwb�.^,w��l rLa.+M LaI J..+'•.I .w • LLOO � •w.i nc ME6LLpR M•+wrii.m.ILr�w L%.Illswq Lq..CSMRo. , •w 03 LOW PLANTING PLAN ,k 4530 L-2 TREES RIF. t Arb1An'k,—' C.rlen,or,aen cwwwa Fresh.Haywood J—W-ia!!elm bm Lagen WRU UAkOPW Prkilwlia awleNe P,atada d.we w PYlr.n seer"& MA PKWAa SHRUBS PLANT SCHEDULE ww,twrlw r.>• ram.. i� �rwlwww Ir•.+n,w r C+a+, hLYnwa r I.�rw�w.wr+y'MMw.rw+M 1N uMnl LrI4+lGT+Lanw iN Akre Seim AmWanelos AeA' Cranda'G N b. DWm 9&Ultle Rer DWI"repel+ He Ocnia'Ydwd o.w.-........�r�.�1�.. .� r,�Y.�.lrr•r,r. !N F .rr,l+.r 1N W - rwfy. fN Lr+,....r l.rwrl(.l.wr 1N Phrlt:en lenaa Saa Jade UWAVrn te.r ..— R-1..beq S.Ma lance Ma Samia c*Aio VA.W. .Wmabbe Gem Y,,="14a .N GROUNDCOVER Erma ua.oao...s wa... w...ic.wwlw - *�,.�, �r.1w,r�o-...•ems w,1� CMpalama wfrat, Nr pr Prwrkh= Ph&no64re Sedu nbMWKfee Thyme herbs bwr� 61 e prepared for. Jjes works Artis Senior Living Facility Artis Senior Living O' A or CONCEPTUAL HYDROZONE PLAN 1651 Old Meadow Rd. L.A. Group Design Works, Inc. 6140 Haven Avenue McLean. VA 22102 'c= Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Landscape Architecture BANYAN STREET k R� Artis Senior Living Facility BANYAN STREET Iq,Rro,�E L CONCEPTUAL HYDROZONE PLAN 6140 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 ,.mcR,rlSr,Dt�,tde ► } �- -- '-'--- -— - "`"`""�rr.1..n.....R..._..+r._.�.,..� 4 r t y � � I ± - • Wn+IwMw .�rrrrbwbwwur 4 ... -- ` Y rn.�wn�i.w�.rwRR.ww Ra.rrw.a er.b pFr9 _k]�L � YOOLRAR Mpaptpx[ .ww+wl rr•�.�w MIMw-Wbw-e r,r.�.ru �' .r KT.-. _ . a. YOOFRt TE 1np10tORf-' I Y lLl •..rrrwryww arwa.+.r MM4M Grr riY YpylwYrrf.Y w+wU w�wwwowlt Ft00FR+TE MPrWPE � � . www�r.rr wrrrrwrutwwWr I Ort pnC YY+r W rrYM wctwy mr+e�rw�I+rw•S Ji '.: - } +F�+ #I r I W sl WATER EFYIC1ErIT L/krOSL� 1M E ,MiR8rEE1 !n� 4 ��i wrplWx'* — 1 L w ,Q 1m Y i57'+ti'•- i. +. .L gg&y��. #.{ RI #4 l'. j4 ,_. ..� � � I L �•'IrR�T+.� a�a- r. ��z+ �• rY rr-� e Z ♦—h �Y .. r� rx V/Yrwrr�...i.-... ILTM M'1wFtOlt D SIN 9T081L rYfrk MLROSOME , 7 FAC ITY 4 ' ,�.. --01--4601 3 --1 -- r_.� �� `IrruRatonE I.MWE `1!r!�-ww�r��_ HIDROZOW . I } �• < .11AIL= _...-- W141 �+ =` = REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE i rLV r !, W Lnvn.nRarott ' 14 ' `I 51 r '?i I 2 n00ER+TE MLRQiC1E _ 1 j.. - Mai 7 r -�—�L-4 " FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROAD __ _ { R .�' I ,Fw W ram. �. rr•` •+ prcErLrrec!for. Drrrwl.l++'�"a �•� — #+ Nc+5i3 i ;atr r�--_ --- ..L�^— Artis Senior Living e � 1rs . s ,siM}nR�LrE i �t M r� LoL 1651 Old Meadow Rd, rR.._ L.A. Group.Design Works, Inc. �' - . " . ,E McLean,VA 22102 =R== Landscape Architecture ARTis SENIOR LIVING 1651 Old Meadow Road Suite 100 McLean,VA 22102 703 992.7985 April 16, 2019 Tabe Van Der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Artis Senior Living, LLC, 6140 Haven Avenue, Project Screen Check Letter for Design Review DRC2017-01011 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003. Letter re business operation (Planning Dept. Comment P.3) Dear Tabe: On behalf of Artis Senior Living, we are pleased to present this updated letter in response to the Project Screen Check Letter referenced above and associated with our proposal to develop a memory care assisted living residence in Rancho Cucamonga. Artis Senior Living Artis Senior Living,a premier developer-owner-operator of assisted living residences, was founded in 2012 by the Bainum family and leading senior care professionals. The Bainum family has a long history of developing and operating senior care facilities since 1959. Ards' portfolio, as of this writing, includes 14 operating communities, 6 under construction, and over 20 sites in various stages of planning and development. Artis' communities have a memory care focus and are dedicated entirely to serving seniors affected by Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia. Site The site is a 3.59 acre parcel located at the SWC of Haven Avenue and Banyan St. Titre site is bounded by the Shepherd of the hills Lutheran Church to the north,Sunset Heights apartments to the south and single family residential to the west. The site is owned by the Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church and is currently being used as a park and ride. As a condition of the sale, the Church is requiring Artis to construct a separate parking lot of 66 spaces on approximately one-half acre to be subdivided and deeded back to the Church. Exhibit C Development Proposal Artis is proposing a 72-resident residential care facility dedicated entirely to people afflicted with Alzheimer's disease and related memory disorders. Tile project will be built with a 64-resident first phase and an eight-resident second phase. The residence is single- story with a maximum height of less than 21 feet from the finished floor elevation. The building will require 42 surface parking spaces. An additional 66 parking spaces along Banyan Street will be developed and subdivided into a separate parcel for the Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church. The building design was refined through 20 years of operational experience with individuals affected by memory loss. Noteworthy features include: o Secure outdoor courtyards (including covered porches) that provide resident-safe landscaping, walking paths,and seating areas. The outdoor areas are fenced to provide privacy for the residents and screening from adjacent neighbors. With respect to the Haven Avenue site, we are especially mindful of providing adequate screening for the residential homes on the western border of the site. o Interior features that include smaller-scale spaces, residential finishes,and themes for way-finding and location recognition. o Four residential "neighborhoods,"with unique identities and visual decor to ease resident anxiety through familiar surroundings. Each neighborhood includes a living room, den,a residential kitchen, and a dining room where meals are served (meals are prepared in the central kitchen). o The "town center" connects the four neighborhoods and features a health center, community center,studio,and beauty salon/barber shop. The town center provides opportunities for larger gatherings and activities including exercise, religious services, entertainment,and additional access to outdoor courtyards. Business Operation Information • Hours of operation: 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. • Number of employees: 3 shifts totaling 45 employees. The day shift (7am — 3pm) will have 26 employees, evening shift (3PM — 11PM) will have 14 employees and night shift (11PM — 7AM) will have S employees. Parking/Visitors The proposed community will have 42 parking spaces. The parking need has been established based on our experience with similar sized communites in the Ards portfolio. 2 The parking is used by staff and visitors. Our residents do not drive. Each community is staffed in 3 shifts and visitors are typically during the daily hours of 9AM - 6PM. We have established our maximum parking requirement for the day shift, 7AM -3PM which has the most employees and visitors. The attached Parking Analysis serves as a summary of parking requirements anticipated for this location. In addition,while we we account for maximum parking for each staff member, our experience is that approximately 30% of staff utilize carpooling or public transportation.Thus, the location along the Haven Avenue transit corridor is very convenient for employee access to public transportation. Transportation Services The community provides transportation for group outings and activities but does not offer individual transpotration services. Church Parking The development will provide 66 parking spaces on a separate parcel to be created for the benefit of the church. Parking will be controlled by using signage to designate church parking vs.Artis parking. We look forward to working with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on approval of this project. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me or Brad Buller if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Rick Bell Consultant Artis Senior Living 3 Artis of Rancho Cucamonga - Parking Analysis Artis memory care assisted living facilities are staffed 24 hours per day, seven days per week. While there are three main work shifts 7AM to 3 PM, 3PM to 11PM,and 11PM to 7AM for the nursing and care giving staff, the hours for other staff vary. Staff Department shift Number LEADERSHIP & FRONT OF HOUSE Executive Director 7AM-3PM 1 Director of Business Service 7AM-3PM 1 Director of Community Relations 7AM-3PM _ 1 Director of Marketing 7AM-3PM 1 Director of Environmental Services 7AM-3PM 1 Concierge 7AM-3PM 1 4 PM —8 PM 1 COMMUNITY CARE& PROGRAMMING Housekeeper 7AM-3PM 2 Director of Health & Wellness 7AM -3PM 1 Coordinator of Health & Wellness 7AM-3PM 3 3PM- 11PM 2 11PM-7AM 1 Director of Partnership 7AM -3PM 1 Development Life Enrichment Assistants 7AM -3PM 2 4PM-8PM 1 Care Partners 7 AM—3 PM 8 3 PM—11 PM 8 _ 11PM-7AM 4 Director of Culinary Services 7AM-3PM 1 Culinary Services Assistant 7AM-3PM 1 3 PM—7 PM Cook 7 AM—3PM 1� 3 PM—7 PM 1 Total 45 7AM— 3PM 26 3PM—11 PM 14 4 11PM -7AM 5 Artis of Rancho Cucamonga - Parking Analysis (continued 45 42 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 v� 18 15 :x r 12 a. 4, 9 _ a m 6 All Raw � 3 z 0 oQ�` ■Concierge and Housekeeping W Care Partners ■1-1ealth&Weilness ■Executive Director a Culinary Services o Environmental Services c Business Services a Community Relations and Programming Manager Marketing S Rick Bell Consultant on behalf of Arils Senior Living,LLC&affiliates 1651 Old Meadow Road,Suite 100 ANTIS McLean VA 22102 �!%.It3, ! % I%C. April 16, 2019 Tabe Van Der Zwaag Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Artis Senior Living, 6140 Haven Avenue, Project Screen Check Letter for Design Review DRC2017-01011, Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003. Letter re Fire/Police calls-for-service (Planning Dept comment P.7). Dear Tabe, I am writing to you on behalf of Artis Senior Living with updated information in regards to the above referenced application for a proposed memory care assisted living residence at 6140 Haven Avenue. Artis Senior Living is a developer, owner and operator of assisted living and memory care residences nationwide. We currently operate 14 communities in the Mid-Atlantic and East Coast markets. As part of the application requirements,this letter outlines our expected demand for fire/police department calls for service. Artis' sole usage of these municipal services is in the form of ambulance runs. In some jurisdictions,those calls also require the fire department to send a truck for every ambulance dispatched—which we count as one call. Artis conducted a survey for each of its six operating and stabilized communities in October 2018, including: Boca Raton, FL; Bridgetown, OH; Evesham, NJ;Great Falls,VA; Mason,OH; and Olney, MD. Based on the survey findings,there is an average of 3.6 calls each month for emergency services or fire alarm activations that result in a visit by emergency responders. In some instances, such as our community in Great Falls,Artis has arranged with emergency responders for limiting siren use. No community complaints over emergency visits have ever been reported. As a memory care assisted living residence, our community offers a care component that is not found in independent senior living and typically is more robust than general assisted living. Our community hires care partners that are certified nursing assistants (CNAs),as well as licensed partical nurses(LPNs), and a registered nurse (RN).The building is staffed 24/7 with at least two types of these direct care providers. In addition to these direct care providers, all members of our staff receive over 40 hours of training in Alzheimer's and dementia care prior to coming on board, including the Executive Director, Marketing staff, Director of Partnership Development, and Life Enrichment Assistants.The amount of trained personnel on staff plays a large role in Artis' ability to keep calls for fire/police services at a minimum. wWW ARTISSLCON1 Exhibit D Please feel free to contact me directly with any additional questions at 925-209-3224. Sincerely, Artis Senior Living, LLC Rids Bell WN"V.AP TISSL.COM DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag September 17, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011 — RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING — A request to construct a 72-bed residential care facility totaling 43,375 square feet on a vacant 3.59-acre parcel of land located within the Low(L)Residential District at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; APN: 0201-821-51. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003.This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15332— In-Fill Development Projects. Site Characteristics:The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a parking facility and landscaping and is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines.There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line(1,620 foot)and the south property line(1,590 foot),with the site generally sloping from north to south.There is an existing eucalyptus windrow along the south property line that will be protected in place, there are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low L Residential District Medium Medium (M) Residential South Multi-Family Development Residential District Low-Medium Low Medium(L)Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential I Low L Residential District Project Details: The project is for the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low(L)Residential District. The existing church (Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church)at the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street currently uses the project site for overflow parking. The majority of parking for the church is currently located on the north side of their facility within a Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement. The church will maintain 66 parking spaces on the project site to comply with the church's minimum parking requirement. The project includes Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 forthe subdivision of the 3.59 project site into two parcels of land. The residential care facility will be located on Parcel A (2.86 acres) and will include the senior care facility along with 42 parking spaces.The church will maintain ownership on Parcel B (.73 acres)which will include 66 parking spaces. The 43,375 square foot single-story structure is designed to evoke the Craftsman architectural design style including the use of a flat concrete roof tile, painted cementitious horizontal shake Exhibit E DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011 — RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING September 17, 2019 Page 2 siding, and stone veneer wainscoting. A bus shelter will be provided on Haven Avenue that is designed to complement the main building including the use of a fiat concrete tile roof supported by battered columns. The facility is broken up into 4 residential"neighborhoods"with unique identities and visual decor to ease resident anxiety through familiar surroundings. Each neighborhood includes a living room, den, a residential kitchen and dining room where meals are served (meals prepared in a common kitchen).A"town center"connects the four"neighborhoods"and features a health center, community center, studio and beauty salon/barber. Outdoor facilities include 2 courtyards and a larger secure common open space area.The facility includes 8-foot-high wrought iron fence along the north, south and west building elevations for security purposes. The fences along the south and west elevations will not be visible from the public right-of-way.The fence along the north elevation will be screened by a 2:1 slope along with dense landscaping. Vehicular access to the site will be provided from 2 existing driveways, 1 on Haven Avenue and 1 on Banyan Street. Decorative stamped paving is proposed at both drive entrances as well as at a circular pedestrian drop off area. A gated fire access drive will be provided on the south side of the building. Outdoor lighting is proposed throughout the parking lot and throughout the pedestrian walkways and along the exterior walls of the building. Freestanding outdoor light will have a maximum height of 15 feet. Existing perimeter walls are located along the south and west property lines and will remain in place. The west property line wall will be required to receive a stucco finish and the stucco finish on the wall along the south property line will be required to be repaired and repainted. Landscaping will be provided around the entire structure and in the parking lot area in compliance with the parking lot landscape requirement of 1 tree per 3 parking spaces. A circular pedestrian drop-off area will be provided at the front entrance that will include a large specimen multi-trunk live oak tree. The project complies with each of the related development requirements for the Low(L)Residential District as shown in the following table: Required/Maximum Provided Building Setback Haven Avenue 45 Feet 120 Feet Building Setback (Banyan Street)_ 35 Feet 121 Feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 22 Feet Side Yard Setback 5 Feet 53 Feet Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Lot Coverage 40 Percent 25 Percent Residential care facilities are required to provide 1 parking space per 4 beds,which translates into a parking requirement of 18 parking spaces based on the proposed 72-bed facility. The residential care facility will provide 42 parking spaces on their parcel, which should adequately serve the 26 employees on the largest shift as well as any guests. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church will maintain ownership of.73 acre of the project site for use as overflow parking. Required parking for the church is based on the number of seats in the main sanctuary. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church has 175 seats in the main sanctuary. Based on the current parking requirement of 1 parking space per 3 fixed seats,the church would be required to provide 54 parking spaces.The church will continue to provide 72 parking spaces on the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement, 8 parking spaces adjacent to the church not on the MWD easement, and 66 parking spaces on the DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011 —RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING September 17, 2019 Page 3 project site. There will be no barriers separating the parking for the residential care facility and the church, with any parking issues to be resolved by the two separate property owners. Artis Residential Care Facili Parking Number of Beds Required Parking Ratio Parkinq Provided Parking 72 1 Per 4 Beds 1 18 42 Shepard of the Hills Church Parking Number of Seats parking Ratio Required Provided Parking _ Parkin On- MWD Project Site Easement Site 175 1 Per 3 Seats 54 8 72 66 Staff Comments; The project is well-designed and complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines.The onsite parking will provide more than adequate parking for both the residential care facility as well as the existing church. Parking conflicts are not anticipated between the two uses as the church will only use their parking during special events which will mostly take place either on Sunday mornings or in the evenings, times at which the residential care facility is not busy. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections(FDC)required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC)shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar materials to those used on-site for the main structure. 2. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on- DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011 —RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING September 17, 2019 Page 4 center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 3. All outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on adjoining properties and the public right-of-way. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the proposed project and forward the project to the Planning Commission for final review and action. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00pm Roll Call: Ray Wimberly x Tony M. Guglielmo x Elisa Cox Mike Smith x Alternates: Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Fallowing each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Page I of 2 r CITY OF RANCHO a . ♦ • a SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011 — RICK BELL FOR ARTIS SENIOR LIVING —A request to construct a 72-bed residential care facility totaling 43,375 square feet on a vacant 3.59-acre parcel of land located within the Low (L) Residential District at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; APN: 0201-821-51. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 20034, Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003, Minor Exception DRC2019-00465, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-01016. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15332—In-Fill Development Projects. The project was approved as presented. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired D. ADJOURNMENT 7:20pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, September 5, 2019 at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 19-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20034, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 3.59 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 72-BED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-821-51. A. Recitals. 1. Rick Bell for Artis Senior Living has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 13, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a landscaped parking lot which is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-way. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line (1,620 foot) and the south property line (1,590 foot), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place,there are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-68 SUBTPM20034 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Medium South Multi-Family Development Residential Medium (M) Residential District Low-Medium Low Medium (L) Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District C. The project is for the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034 is for the subdivision of the 3.59 project site into two parcels of land. The residential care facility will be located on Parcel A(2.86 acres)and will include the senior care facility along with 42 parking spaces.The current property owner, Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church will maintain ownership on Parcel B (.73 acres) which will include 66 parking spaces; and e. This application is being processed concurrently with Design Review DRC2017- 01011 for review of the site plan and design of a 72-bed residential care facility, Conditional Use Permit 2017-01011 for the operation of a 72-bed residential care facility, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00465 for security walls/fences over the maximum permitted 6-foot height limit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed subdivision of the 3.59-acre project site into 2 parcels of land is necessary in order to provide a separate parking lot for the Shepard of the Hills Church, which is located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street.The General Plan permits land uses within residential districts that are complementary to the surrounding land uses, such as churches and residential care facilities. The Development Code permits both churches and residential care facilities within the Low(L) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two parcel tentative parcel map and the proposed residential care facility comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Development Code, except for the necessity for up to 8-foot-high security walls/fences for which the applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2019-00465)application. Each parcel complies with the 7,200 square foot minimum lot size outlined in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Development Code. Additionally, the proposed residential care facility and parking lot comply with all of the related development standards including buiding setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking and design; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed residential care facility as it is located at the intersection of two PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-68 SUBTPM20034 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 3 public streets, provides two points of vehicle access along with a public transit stop; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Environmental studies related to traffic, noise, air quality/greenhouse gasses and biological resources were submitted as part of the review of the project which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems.The subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues, as the proposed tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels in order to create a separate parcel for Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church in order to comply with the minimum parking requirement for the church. The review of the project included the evaluation of environmental studies which concluded that the project would not a serious impact on the environment. f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Low/Low(L)Residential District, which permits the development and operation of residential care facilities subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project does require approval of a minor exception to permit security fencing over the maximum fence height limit. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption are outlined below: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Analysis (Dudek;August 7,2018)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. Trip rates were calculated based on the Assisted Living (254) trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Addition (ITE, 2017)). It was determined that the project would generate 187 total daily trips and 19 peak hour trips, which is below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-68 SUBTPM20034 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 4 b) Noise:A Noise Impact Analysis (Dudek;August 14, 2018)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project would comply with the construction and operational noise and vibration requirements with the installation of a temporary noise barrier during the construction phases of the project. Conditions of Approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval outlining the required measures to reduce the construction noise and vibration impacts to comply with noise level limitations. c) Air Quality: An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Dudek: May 25, 2018)were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Pacific Coast Civil Inc.; July 18, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological:A Biological Resource Assessment(BRA) (TeraCor; January 18, 2019)was prepared for the vacant project site. The BRA concludes that sensitive plant or wildlife species, including any sensitive invertebrates, are not expected to occur within the area given the condition of the site and developed nature of the surrounding land uses. The proposed project, therefore, would not affect any sensitive species that would require further investigation. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Ann McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Ann McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-68 SUBTPM20034 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-01011, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 72-BED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY TOTALING 43,375 SQUARE FEET ON A VACANT 3.59- ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW (L)RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-821-51. A. Recitals. 1. Rick Bell for Artis Senior Living has filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-01011, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Nov13, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a landscaped parking lot which is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-way. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line (1,620 foot) and the south property line (1,590 foot), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place,there are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-69 DRC2017-01011 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low L Residential District Medium South Multi-Family Development Residential Medium M Residential District Low-Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District C. The project is for the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. The 43,375 square foot single-story structure is designed to evoke the Craftsman architectural design style including the use of a flat concrete roof tile, painted cementitious horizontal shake siding, and stone veneer wainscoting; and e. The project complies with each of the related development requirements except for wall/fence height for the Low (L) Residential District as demonstrated in the following table: Required/Maximum Provided Building Setback Haven Avenue 45 Feet 120 Feet Building Setback (Banyan Street) 35 Feet 121 Feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 22 Feet Side Yard Setback 5 Feet 53 Feet Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Lot Coverage 40 Percent 25 Percent Wall/Fence Height 6 Feet 8 Feet f. The 43,375 square foot single-story structure is designed to evoke the Craftsman architectural design style including the use of a flat concrete roof tile, painted cementitious horizontal shake siding, and stone veneer wainscoting; and g. The facility is broken up into 4 residential "neighborhoods" with unique identities and visual decor to ease resident anxiety through familiar surroundings. Each neighborhood includes a living room, den, a residential kitchen and a dining room where meals are served (meals prepared in a common kitchen). A "town center" will connect the four "neighborhoods" and will feature a health center, community center, studio and beauty salon/barber. Outdoor facilities include 2 courtyards and a larger secure common open space area; and h. Residential care facilities are required to provide 1 parking space per beds,which translates into a parking requirement of 18 parking spaces based on the proposed 72-bed facility. The residential care facility will provide 42 parking spaces on their parcel,which should adequately serve the 26 employees on the largest shift as well as any guests; and i. Vehicular access to the site will be provided by 2 existing driveways,one on Haven Avenue and one on Banyan Street; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-69 DRC2017-01011 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 3 j. This application is being processed concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034,to subdivide the project into two separate parcels(one to be owned and maintained by Shepard of the Hills church to be used as a parking lot), Conditional Use Permit 2017-01011 for a proposal to establish and operate a 72-bed residential care facility, and Minor Exception DRC2019- 00465 security walls/fences over the maximum permitted 6-foot height limit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a building for the purposes of operating an assisted living facility.The underlying General Plan designation is Low(L) Residential District,which is a permitted use subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed land use (Residential Care Facility) is similar to residential land uses and consistent with the land uses within the vicinity. The proposed residential care facility complies with all related standards outlined in the Development Code including building setbacks, building height, parking, and landscape coverage. The project, though, includes security fencing up to 8 feet in height which exceeds the maximum 6-foot fencing permitted within residential districts.The applicant has submitted Minor Exception DRC2019-00465. The project provides two points of access from the adjacent public streets and will comply will all performance standards for the Low (L) Residential District. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code. The proposed residential care facility complies with all related standards outlined in the Development Code including building setbacks, building height, parking, and landscape coverage. The project, though, includes security fencing up to 8 feet in height which exceeds the maximum 6-foot fencing permitted within residential districts. The applicant has submitted Minor Exception DRC2019-00465. The project provides two points of access from the adjacent public streets and will comply will all performance standards of the Low (L) Residential District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed residential care facility is a compatible use to the residential land uses adjacent to the project site. The zoning of the property and the property to the north and west is Low (L) Residential District. The proposed use is quiet in nature and has been designed and conditioned to limit negative impacts on the adjacent residential land uses. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-69 DRC2017-01011 -ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 4 services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Low/Low(L)Residential District, which permits the development and operation of residential care facilities subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project does require the approval of a minor exception to permit security fencing over the maximum fence height limit. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption are outlined below: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Analysis(Dudek;August 7,2018)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. Trip rates were calculated based on the Assisted Living (254) trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Addition (ITE, 2017)). It was determined that the project would generate 187 total daily trips and 19 peak hour trips, which is below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise:A Noise Impact Analysis (Dudek;August 14, 2018)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project would comply with the construction and operational noise and vibration requirements with the installation of a temporary noise barrier during the construction phases of the project. Conditions of Approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval outlining the required measures to reduce the construction noise and vibration impacts to comply with noise level limitations. c) Air Quality: An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Dudek: May 25, 2018)were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Pacific Coast Civil Inc.; July 18, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment(BRA) (TeraCor; January 18, 2019)was prepared for the vacant project site. The BRA concludes that sensitive plant or wildlife species, including any sensitive invertebrates, are not expected to occur within the area given the condition of the site and developed nature of the surrounding land uses. The proposed project, therefore, would not affect any sensitive species that would require further investigation. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-69 DRC2017-01011 - ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 5 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Ann McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Ann McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-01003, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A 72-BED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY ON A VACANT 3.59-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTATTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-821-51. A. Recitals. 1. Rick Bell for Artis Senior Living has filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-01003, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 13, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a landscaped parking lot which is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-way. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line (1,620 foot) and the south property line (1,590 foot), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place,there are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-70 DRC2017-01003 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Medium South Multi-Family Development Residential Medium (M) Residential District Low-Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District C. The project includes the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. Per Development Code Table 17.30.030-1, residential care facilities require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate in the Low(L)Residential District.The proposed 72- bed residential care facility will be entirely dedicated to the care of persons with memory-related disorders; and e. The facility will operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.A total of 45 employees will be employed by the facility with 26 employees working the day shift from 7:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m., 14 employees working the evening shift from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and 5 employees working the graveyard shift from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.; and f. This application is being processed concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034,to subdivide the project into two separate parcels(one to be owned and maintained by Shepard of the Hills church to be used as a parking lot), Design Review DRC2017-01011 for review of the site plan and design of a 72-bed residential care facility, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00465 security walls/fences over the maximum permitted 6-foot height limit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable Zoning District and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or City regulations/standards. The proposed Residential Care Facility is located within the Low (L) General Plan land use and Development Code zoning district. The proposed Residential Care Facility is consistent with the intent of the zoning district and the General Plan land use designation, as residential care facilities are permitted within the Low(L) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The facility is designed in accordance with all applicable development standards of the Development Code such as building setbacks, building height, and parking. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The proposed residential care facility complies with all related standards outlined in the Development Code including building setbacks, building height, parking, and landscape coverage. The project, though, includes securityfencing up to 8 feet in height which exceeds the maximum 6-foot fencing permitted within residential districts. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-70 DRC2017-01003 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 3 The applicant has submitted Minor Exception DRC2019-00465. The project provides two points of access from the adjacent public streets and will comply will all performance standards of the Low(L) Residential District. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The proposed residential care facility will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties as it will operate in full compliance with the performance standards of the Low (L) Residential District. The applicant has submitted environmental studies related to noise, biological resources, air quality and greenhouse gasses that conclude that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Low/Low(L)Residential District, which permits the development and operation of residential care facilities subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project does require approval of a minor exception to permit security fencing over the maximum fence height limit. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption are outlined below: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Analysis(Dudek;August 7,2018)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. Trip rates were calculated based on the Assisted Living (254) trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Addition (ITE, 2017)). It was determined that the project would generate 187 total daily trips and 19 peak hour trips, which is below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise:A Noise Impact Analysis(Dudek;August 14, 2018)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project would comply with the construction and operational noise and vibration requirements with the installation of a temporary noise barrier during the construction phases of the project. Conditions of Approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval outlining the required measures to reduce the construction noise and vibration impacts to comply with noise level limitations. c) Air Quality: An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Dudek: May 25, 2018)were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-70 DRC2017-01003 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 4 construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Pacific Coast Civil Inc.; July 18, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (TeraCor; January 18, 2019)was prepared for the vacant project site. The BRA concludes that sensitive plant or wildlife species, including any sensitive invertebrates, are not expected to occur within the area given the condition of the site and developed nature of the surrounding land uses. The proposed project, therefore, would not affect any sensitive species that would require further investigation. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition setforth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Ann McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Ann McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13t" day of November 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00465, A REQUEST FOR WALLS/FENCES UP TO 8 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR SECURITY PURPOSES RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 72-BED RESIDENTIAL CARE ON A VACANT 3.59-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-821-51. A. Recitals. 1. Rick Bell for Artis Senior Living has filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2019-00465, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 13, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a landscaped parking lot which is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-way. Block walls have been constructed along the south and west property lines. There is an approximately 30-foot grade difference between the north property line (1,620 foot) and the south property line (1,590 foot), with the site generally sloping from north to south. An existing eucalyptus windrow is located along the south property line that will be protected in place,there are also a number of onsite trees that do not qualify as heritage trees that will be removed as part of the project; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-71 DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District North Shepherd of the Hills church Low Residential Low L Residential District Medium South Multi-Family Development Residential Medium M Residential District Low-Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential East Single-Family Residences Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District C. The project includes the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility. Residential Care Facilities are a permitted use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. The project complies with each of the related development requirements except for wall/fence height for the Low (L) Residential District as demonstrated in the following table: Required/Maximum Provided Building Setback Haven Avenue 45 Feet 120 Feet Building Setback (Banyan Street) 35 Feet 121 Feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 22 Feet Side Yard Setback 5 Feet 53 Feet Building Height 35 Feet 20 Feet Lot Coverage 40 Percent 25 Percent Wall/Fence Height 6 Feet 8 Feet e. The project includes a request to construct up to 8-foot tall security fencing around the facility along with an 8-foot security wall around a backup generator. The maximum wall/fence height permitted within the Low (L) Residential district is 6 feet. The additional fence height is necessary to prevent memory care patients from wandering away from the facility and to protect/screen the backup generator. Development Code Section 17.16.110 allows for an up to 2- foot increase in wall height subject to the approval of a Minor Exception. f. The application is being processed concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034,to subdivide the project into two separate parcels(one to be owned and maintained by Shepard of the Hills church to be used as a parking lot), Design Review DRC2017-01011 for review of the site plan and design of a 72-bed residential care facility, and Conditional Use Permit 2017-01011 for a proposal to establish and operate a 72-bed residential care facility. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in the maximum permitted wall height is consistent with the purpose of the Low General Plan land use designation, which permits complementary land uses within residential districts.The proposed senior care facility is compatible with the residential land use designation as it will be quiet in nature, has a low profile (single-story), PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-71 DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 3 and will not negatively impact the existing traffic patterns. The additional fence height is necessary to secure the open space areas around the facility and to protect/screen the backup generator. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The project site is surrounded by residential land uses to the east, west, and south and by an existing church to the north. The additional wall/fence height is necessary to properly secure the proposed senior care facility. The additional wall/fence height will be screened from public view by the onsite structure and by existing and proposed landscaping. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The additional wall/fence height is necessary to secure the outdoor recreation areas and backup generator of a residential care facility dedicated to the care of memory care patients. Without the additional wall/fence height, the facility would not be able to properly secure the outdoor recreation area and the safety of their patents. public view by the onsite structure and by existing and proposed landscaping. The security wall/fence along the west elevation will consist of 6-foot-tall solid vinyl fencing/gates topped by 2 feet of open vinyl lattice fencing along with 10 feet of the 8-foot-tall block faced in stone veneer to match the building. The height of the wrought iron fence along the north elevation will be screened by a 2:1 slope along with landscaping. d. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The additional wall/fence height is necessary to secure the outdoor recreation areas and backup generator of a senior care facility dedicated to the care of memory care patients. Without the additional wall/fence height, the facility would not be able to properly secure the outdoor recreation areas surrounding the residential care faclity and the safety of their patents. The security wall/fence along the west elevation will consist of 6-foot-tall vinyl fencing/gates topped by 2 feet of open vinyl lattice fencing along with 10 feet of the 8-foot-tall block faced in stone veneer to match the building. The height of the wrought iron fence along the north elevation will be screened by a 2:1 slope along with landscaping. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332- In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Low/Low(L)Residential District, which permits the development and operation of residential care facilities subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project does require approval of a minor exception to permit security fencing over the maximum fence height limit. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-71 DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 4 surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption are outlined below: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Analysis(Dudek;August 7,2018)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. Trip rates were calculated based on the Assisted Living (254) trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Addition (ITE, 2017)). It was determined that the project would generate 187 total daily trips and 19 peak hour trips, which is below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise:A Noise Impact Analysis(Dudek;August 14, 2018)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project would comply with the construction and operational noise and vibration requirements with the installation of a temporary noise barrier during the construction phases of the project. Conditions of Approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval outlining the required measures to reduce the construction noise and vibration impacts to comply with noise level limitations. c) Air Quality: An Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Dudek: May 25, 2018)were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Pacific Coast Civil Inc.; July 18, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment(BRA) (TeraCor; January 18, 2019)was prepared for the vacant project site. The BRA concludes that sensitive plant or wildlife species, including any sensitive invertebrates, are not expected to occur within the area given the condition of the site and developed nature of the surrounding land uses. The proposed project, therefore, would not affect any sensitive species that would require further investigation. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-71 DRC2019-00465 ARTIS SENIOR LIVING November 13, 2019 Page 5 ATTEST: Ann McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Ann McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall set up a meeting with American Medical Response, Inc. (AMR), Planning Department and Fire District staff to develop solutions to reduce potential noise impacts to the adjacent neighborhood. 2. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. 3. The applicant shall set up a meeting with Planning Department and Fire District staff, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, to develop solutions to reduce potential noise impacts to the adjacent neighborhood. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Noise Mitigations: 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit , the property owner/developer shall submit plans and/or specification to the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department demonstrating the concrete saws shall not be used as part of demolition or construction activities, as this noise source is approximately 10 dBA greater than all other anticipated construction equipment. 2. Prior to issuance of each permit for demolition or grading, the property owner/developer shall submit construction plans and/or specification to the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department demonstrating that the installation of a temporary noise barrier between the construction area and the adjacent residences is required. The barrier shall be 12 feet high and solid from the ground to the top. The barrier shall be constructed with plywood that is at least 1/2 inch thick or with another material that creates a noise transmission loss of at least 20 dBA. The barrier shall be constructed at the boundary of the construction zone, or along the subject property boundaries, on the west, north, south, and west sides of the property. 3. Prior to issuance of each permit for demolition or grading within 500 feet of existing residences or within 325 feet of commercial or industrial building, the property owner/developer shall submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan to the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from the equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. The plan shall demonstrate that the construction plans and specifications include the following noise abatement, notification, and control measures: a. All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise-attenuation devices. b. Stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. c. On-site and off-site construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise-sensitive use as feasible. d. A "Construction Noise Coordinator" shall be identified. The construction noise coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complain is received, the construction noise coordinator shall notify the City within 48 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the planning Department. Sign shall be posted at the construction that include the contact information for the Constitution noise coordinator. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 2 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modification or intensification of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 6. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 8. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 3 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 13. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 14. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 15. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 16. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 17. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 18. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 19. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 4 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 22. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 23. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 24. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 25. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 26. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 27. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 28. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 29. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 5 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 31. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 32. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 33. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 34. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 35. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 36. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All Park and Ride signs shall be removed upon termination of the agreement between the applicant and the Park and Ride authority. 2. At least 30 days public notice shall be posted prior to Park and Ride closure. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 6 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Development impact fees per the Engineering Fee schedule are due prior to issuance of building permit. *Note that fees are subject to change* 4. Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development on Haven and connect with a box to the existing conduit on Banyan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 '/4" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. The existing curb ramp at the southwest corner of Haven and Banyan shall be removed and reconstructed to current ADA standards. A street plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the reconstruction of any street improvements including ADA ramps. All ADA shall be drawn as a 10-scale or larger detail showing elevations, distances/dimensions and slope gradients. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 7. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Environmental Engineering at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 8. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 9. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 10. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 7 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 12. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: 13. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. 14. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: Any public improvements along Banyan Street and Haven Avenue. 15. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Any public improvements along Banyan Street and Haven Avenue. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Generators The generator installation must comply with currently adopted editions of NFPA 30, 37, 110 and if battery equipment is associated with the project it must also comply with NFPA 111. The level of compliance must be in accordance with the generator's function as emergency generator or a backup generator as defined by NFPA 110. Testing and acceptance criteria is strictly observed. The manufacturer or a third-party report must be provided in accordance with NFPA 110. Plans shall include all specifications of the equipment to be installed along with the electrical plans and load calculations. All equipment must be listed. Working clearances and clearances to the building based on the fuel capacity must be observed. AQMD permits are required with the plan check submittals. Dual fuel generators may be required by AQMD for testing purposes. The generator operation must be monitored remotely by a qualified alarm supervising station. A separate submittal is required for the alarm connection. 2. Commercial Building Signage Building street address signage is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. Release of Construction Permits Fire District release of construction permits issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino will be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 8 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Storm Water Retention Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in the engineered onsite storm water retention plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior walls of all normally occupied buildings. 5. Knox Box Knox Box(es) is/are required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this business, keys for the suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 6. Fire Service Site Plan Provide a fire service site plan in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Project Security— Required Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a fire protection and site safety plan is required to be implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of foundation form materials. The fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be in compliance with Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction permits being approved and issued. 8. Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials — Submittal to County CUPA. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan is required to be submitted to the San Bernardino County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Submittal can be made electronically through the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) at https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ Hazardous Materials — Submittal to Fire Construction Services. A Hazardous Materials Management Plan and a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement are required to be submitted to the Fire District. See Sections 5001.5.1 and 5001.5.2 of the California Fire Code. 9. Commercial/Industrial Gates Gates installed across a fire lane are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. Temporary Fire Access and Hydrants Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 9 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CRC NFPA 13, and the Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. The corridors from the interior courtyards to the public way shall be 2 hour rated fire tunnels to provide means of emergency egress out of the interior courtyards. A plumbing "First Release" from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) is required for all projects that have plumbing work; your project requires a first release from CVWD. Their lead times for a "First Release" is up to 6 weeks, please contact CVWD at (909) 483-7448 ASAP to submit the necessary application and plumbing plans for their review; payment of fees and issuance of a first release. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not issue building permits for your project until the applicant of the project submits a copy of the plumbing's "First Release" to Building and Safety (B&S). It is your responsibility to obtain a "First Release" from CVWD and submitted to B&S. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 4.106.4. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer or his designee and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 3. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 4. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 10 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 5. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 6. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 7. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 8. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 9. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 10. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 11 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 13. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 15. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 16. Section 1.5.1, Table 1-1 Priority Projects, Category No. 1, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans reads "All significant re-development projects — defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet (sq. ft.) of impervious surface on an already developed site subject to discretionary approval of the permitting jurisdiction . In addition: Where re-development results in an increase of 50% or more of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing developed site, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 4 applies to the entire development. The project is showing 62.4% of total impervious area. The proposed/removal/replacement impervious area equals or exceeds 50% of the existing impervious area, the project is conditioned, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, to prepare a final project-specific water quality management plan to treat the storm water runoff of the entire development's impervious area. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 12 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 13 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 19. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. 20. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 21. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 22. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. 23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 27. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 28. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 29. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 14 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 31. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 32. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 33. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 34. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Haven Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Services Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 35. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 15 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 38. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 39. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 41. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 42. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 44. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 45. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 46. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 16 of 17 Project#: DRC2017-01011 DRC2017-01003, DRC2017-01016, DRC2019-00465, SUBTPM20034 Project Name: EDR -Artis Senior Living Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Minor Exception, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 47. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 48. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 49. The conceptual grading and drainage plan is showing driveway slopes at or above 10%. Therefore, prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show driveway profiles for the driveway from the street curb line to the drive aisle. 50. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. www.CityofRC.us Printed:11/14/2019 Page 17 of 17 RESOLUTION NO. 23-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20034-1, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 3.59- ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 72-BED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-821-51. A. Recitals. 1. Flatiron Development Group has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26h day of April 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 26, 2023, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 3.59-acre vacant project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The site is developed with a landscaped parking lot which is currently being used by the Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church as overflow parking; and b. All street improvements including curb, gutter, landscaped parkway,and sidewalks have been constructed along the Haven Avenue and Banyan Street right-of-way; and C. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Exhibit D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-08 SUBTPM20034-1 — FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT GROUP April 26, 2023 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential North Existing Church Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Multi-Family South Development Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Single-Family East Residences Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium M Residential Single-Family West Residences Suburban Neighborhood Very Low Low L Residential d. The subject tentative map is related to the construction and operation of a 72-bed senior memory care facility which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 2019, identified as project case file DRC2017-01011; and e. SUBTPM20034 was subject to a 3-year timeline pursuant to Municipal Code Section16.16.160 and which expired on November 13, 2022; f. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20034-1, which replaces the expired SUBTPM20034, is for the subdivision of the 3.59 project site into two parcels of land. The residential care facility will be located on Parcel A (2.86 acres) and will include the senior care facility along with 42 parking spaces. The current property owner, Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church will maintain ownership of Parcel B (.73 acres)which will include 66 parking spaces. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed subdivision of the 3.59-acre project site into 2 parcels of land is necessary to provide a separate parking lot for the Shepard of the Hills Church, which is located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. The General Plan permits land uses within residential districts that are complementary to the surrounding land uses, such as churches and residential care facilities. The Development Code permits both churches and residential care facilities within the Medium (M)Zone subject to the approval of a Minor Use Permit. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two-parcel tentative parcel map complies with the requirements of the General Plan and Development Code, each parcel complies with the 4,000 square-foot minimum lot size outlined in Table 17.36.010-1 B of the Development Code. Additionally, the approved residential care facility and parking lot comply with all of the related development standards including building setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking, and design; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed residential care facility as it is located at the intersection of two public streets, provides two points of vehicle access along with a public transit stop; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-08 SUBTPM20034-1 — FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT GROUP April 26, 2023 Page 3 d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat.The original project included an environmental review which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems.The subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues, as the proposed tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels to create a separate parcel for Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church to comply with the minimum parking requirement for the church. The original project included environmental studies which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. The project is for the subdivision of 3.59 acres into two parcels of land. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26t" DAY OF April 2023. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Bryan Dopp, Chairman ATTEST: Matt Marquez, Secretary I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of April 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-08 SUBTPM20034-1 — FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT GROUP April 26, 2023 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM200341 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church at 6080 Haven Avenue (APN: 20182150) maintain ownership of Parcel B (.73 acres) which will include 66 parking spaces to be used for overflow parking for church-related uses. 2. All of the Planning and Economic Development Department Conditions of Approval for SUBTPM20034 (Resolution of Approval 19.68) and DRC2017-01011 (Resolution of Approval 19.69) shall apply to this parcel map (SUBTPM20034-1). Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. Exhibit E www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/17/2023 Project#: SUBTPM200341 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively "Indemnitees"), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director's actions, the Planning Commission's actions, and/or the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All of the Engineering Conditions of Approval for DRC2017-01011 and SUBTPM20034 shall apply to this parcel map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/17/2023 Page 2 of 3 Project#: SUBTPM200341 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map Location: 6140 HAVEN AVE - 020182151-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The fire access / fire lane and fire water mains cross existing property lines, are located on property not under the control of the applicant or are located on a property that is being or could be subdivided. To ensure continued Fire District use of and access to, and maintenance as needed, of the fire access / fire lane and fire water mains, a reciprocal agreement between property owners and the Fire District is required. The agreement is required to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder. A site plan showing the location of the fire access / fire lane and fire water mains is required to be included with the agreement. The agreement is required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire District prior to recording. Proof of recordation is required to be submitted to the Fire District. A template of this agreement has been included in Fire District Standard 5-10, which has been uploaded to the Documents section. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/17/2023 Page 3 of 3