Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-11 Agenda Packet DECEMBER 11 2019 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. 6:00 P.M. --CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Francisco Oaxaca Tom Tisler(Bicycle) Tony Morales Carol Douglass (Equestrian) Bryan Dopp (Alternate) Mike Smith (Staff Coordinator) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Trails Advisory Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. DISCUSSION ITEMS C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00502 — GCA LAND — A request to consider requirements to construct trail improvements previously approved under Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961, related to site plan and architectural review of 6 single-family residence on SUBTT18961, located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane in the Very Low (VL) District; APN: 1061-691-21, -22, -23, -24, -25, -26, -27. E. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Trails Advisory Committee to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. Page 1 of 2 DECEMBER 11 2019 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE G. ADJOURNMENT I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant II of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, December 05, 2019, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 2 of 2 001 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS 6:00 p.m. DAT TRAN December 11, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00502 — GCA LAND — A request to consider requirements to construct trail improvements previously approved under Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961, related to site plan and architectural review of 6 single-family residence on SUBTT18961, located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane in the Very Low (VL) District; APN: 1061-691-21, -22, -23, -24, -25, -26, -27. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is a 4.75-acre site located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane. The site is within the Very Low(VL) Residential District. The site is surrounded to the north, west and south by existing single-family residential homes which are also in the Very Low (VL) District. The project site's northern boundary is adjacent to an existing 15 foot wide equestrian trail easement at the rear of the single-family homes. The project site's east boundary is shared with Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961, for the subdivision of the project site into 7 single-family lots.The site was a rectangular lot measuring approximately 315 feet in width (from north to south), and 675 feet in length (from east to west), owned by Mr. Romy Octa. At the time of the review and approval of SUBTT18961, the site was improved with an existing single-family residence located at the northwest corner of the lot. After approval of SUBTT18961, a rectangular lot measuring approximately 172 feet in width and 290 feet in length was created. This new lot, now referred to as Lot 1, contains the above-noted single- family residence. Mr. Octa retained ownership of Lot 1. The remainder of the site, measuring approximately 3.19 acres, was subdivided into 6 single-family residential lots and sold to a developer for future development. Approval of SUBTT18961 included conditions of approval requiring the installation of local feeder trails prior to the recordation of the final map (Exhibit C). SUBTT18961 included a site plan showing a 15 foot wide private equestrian trail easement and 4 foot wide drainage easement along the north property line of Lot 1. The easement on Lot 1 connects to trail easements dedicated along the rear of the other 6 lots to create a unified local trail network. Lot 1 is also the only access point for the trail network onto Sapphire Street. Without Lot 1's trail easement, the other 6 lots' trail easements would not be accessible from the public right-of-way. One of the conditions of approval (Condition of Approval #10) on SUBTT18961 specified that the design of the trail shall conform to Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B (Exhibit D). Standard Drawings 1006-B and 1007-B requires a 20 foot wide easement at the entrance of local trail networks. The intent of the 20 foot wide easement is to provide adequate width for equestrian vehicles (e.g. hay delivery vehicles) to access the trail. Standard Drawings 1006-B and 1007-B also specified the exact design of local trail improvements, including metal swing gates, split rail fencing and step-through posts at the entrance. Per Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B, all lots on the project site are required to have the split rail fencing along the length of the trail easement. Lot 1 is required to have the 20 foot easement, metal swing gates and step-through posts at its entrance because it provides access to the other trail's easements. 002 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00502 —GCA LAND December 11, 2019 Page 2 All conditions of approval were required to be fulfilled prior to recordation of the Final Map. The Final Map was recorded on October 22, 2018 and included the 15 foot easement on all lots. However, due to staff error, Condition of Approval #10 was never implemented prior to final recordation. The Final Map did not include the 20 foot wide easement at the entrance of the trail. Trail improvements were also not constructed prior to the recordation of the Final Map.As a result, the trail is unimproved and does not conform to Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. Analysis: Staff discovered the error during review of the rough grading plans for the project site. The applicant and current property owner, GCA Land, agreed to make the necessary trail improvements as originally specified in the conditions of approval. The improvements would include all trail and drainage improvements along the north side of Lot 1 (Exhibit E). The applicant approached the property owner, Mr. Octa, and offered to pay for all trail improvements. A private agreement was reached between the two parties on October 28, 2019. A signed and notarized letter was submitted to staff, specifying that Mr. Octa granted the applicant permission to install all required trail improvements (Exhibit F). As the original land owner, Mr. Octa would have been required to construct the improvements prior to subdividing the site. With the agreement, the requirement to pay for all trail and drainage improvements would become the responsibility of the applicant. After the project site was surveyed, Mr. Octa realized that the improvements in the 15 foot easement would conflict with existing fruit-bearing persimmon trees planted on the site. There are a total of 6 trees located in the easement. The trees are planted in a line, approximately along the interior easement line, where the split rail fencing would be installed. Mr. Octa requested that the applicant improve the trail without removing the trees and the parties reached an impasse. Staff met with Mr. Octa onsite on November 26, 2019, to discuss the issue. Mr. Octa agreed to permit the 20 foot easement, gate and trail access improvements at the front of the trail as required per Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. He continued to request that trail improvements not impact the trees. Staff reviewed the conditions and offers the following two options: 1. The City can approve modifications to the trail improvements to preserve the trees. The entrance of the trail would be improved per the Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B, including the 20 foot easement and all improvements at the entrance of the trail. The split rail fencing would extend the entire length of the trail, with breaks in the fencing to accommodate the trees. The exterior easement line (along Lot 1's northerly property line) would have split rail fencing along the entire length. Grading of the trail, which includes installation of decomposed granite as trail surface, would occur throughout the entire length of the trail. In the portions of the trail adjacent to the trees, grading and trail surface installation would be reduced to avoid damage to the root and base of the trees. Due to slope conditions along the trail, some portions of the trail could be reduced to as much as 5 feet in width. These improvements in this option would be the responsibility of the applicant proposing the construction of the 6 new homes. Lastly, in order to preserve the trees, the 4 foot drainage easement along the 15 foot easement would need to be re- routed deeper to the interior of Lot 1 or removed from the plans altogether. The drainage easement is for the sole use of the property owner of Lot 1 and does not affect any other drainage easements on the other lots. The proposed modifications would be permanent until a future redevelopment of Lot 1. At a future date, a condition of approval could be 003 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00502 —GCA LAND December 11, 2019 Page 3 placed on the development approval requiring the property owner bring the site into conformance with the trail standards. 2. The decision could be made to leave the portion of the trail adjacent to the persimmon trees unimproved until such time that the property owner of Lot 1 proposes to further redevelop their property, at which time the final trail improvements could be conditioned and implemented. Lot 1's property owner would be the party responsible for this future improvement. In this option, only the trail entrance and the trail to the east of the persimmon trees would be immediately improved as it relates to the subject development application to construct the 6 new residences. A modification to the existing tract map would need to be submitted for either option. The tract map would be required to show a 20 foot wide easement at the entrance of the site and an alternative design to the drainage easement if it is rerouted. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee discuss the options outlined in the staff report and provide a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Committee may also provide alternative recommendations than the two options outlined in this report.The Committee's recommendation will be presented to the Planning Commission as a condition of approval for Design Review DRC2019-00502 related to the site plan and architectural review of 6 single-family residences on the remaining lots. Staff Planner: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Site Plan Showing All Existing Approved Easements Exhibit B Aerial Photo Exhibit C SUBTT18961 Staff Report, Resolutions and Conditions of Approval Exhibit D Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B Exhibit E Rough Grading Plans Showing Proposed Trail and Drainage Improvements Exhibit F Signed Agreement with Mr. Romy Octa, Property Owner of Lot 1 004 ............... . tj La mn P r � � � a. a _n s Ulac},msit a SLKA= zWW) xcuz f` _ _-- --. I — __. _t —n _ a wo r a 'R 0 of ZO co _C � 1 �W r s3 cc @ f Mg. 1 4 d [ a 7 m s' r it ui p Ito WE Wff&SFM kmw ac UM&W u-v to 12 LL a w E� ar,= W PR ,emu.;... a mm, cr En M _..,.{ p ]�@iT&..,... ¢ 'gTiT A® .%m M 63 ®.gucm w du cl s mO AIM m.guto Ln LU ffi p n rrb Exhibit A 005 k tt. k i h a t s � � tt Exhibit 006 STAFF REPoRT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE:__ January1 Chairman and Members of the Planning o ission CUCAMONGA Candyce Bumett, Planning Director : Dominick Perez, Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -T I FOR HOKE, L - request to subdivideone existing .7 - cr rc l into parcels withint strl n Oveday of the Very L L) Residential Zoning Distdct located at the northeast corner of Sapphire,Streetri ny Lane at 5615 SapphireStreet- : 1 1- is project Is categorically t per Section 1 (in-Fill Development Projects) of the California vir t i Qualiy t i ui li RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the PlanningCommission approve Tentative r Map 1 through the adoptionof the attachedResolution r v l with Conditions. n November 4, 2014, following the preparationof the Staff Reportfor this project, staff received ii letter signed y three residents that live adjacent to the subjectproperty that raised concerns involving site design and drainage. November 1 , 2014, prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received itio t included total of thirty-eight signatures from j c nt residents (Exhibit F). In additionto the residents' r s, there s an outstanding technical issue that needed to be addressedh involved required t Lot 3. Therefore, based on the resident's concerns technical issue, staff recommended is project be continued at the November 12, 2014, Planning ission meeting to allowthe applicantr time to work ith staff to resolve the issues. The PlanningCommission continued SUBTT18961to a date unspecified, &NALYSIS: n November 19, 2014, staff fromthe Planning, Building nd Safety andn in rin Departmentsi e applicant to addressthe above-mentionedconcerns. oll following is list f issues discussedthe revisions that were made to addressthe concems. r v 1, vember 12, 2014, during his concern was ex r s rin t o first neighborhood the Planningissio ting on August 20, 2014, Following the initial hearing, multiple residents i r ti Planning, Engineedng and Building spoke and expressed rn and Safety Department staff met to discuss the drainage regarding futur r In f the concems. The Engineeringis created subject property. it condition requiring the applicant to providecalculations concerns mainly Involved install appropdate additional drainage inlet facilities s the drainage ofd affect determinedthe CityEngineer at the south of Brittany existing residential r i s Lane, This condition s created to address any potential located sla of the site, drainage impacts. The projectapplicant is in agreement with including cul-de-sac this condition. (Brittany Lane) located to the south. -Additionally, on December 3, 2014, the applicant submitted r vi t r i t r o t o Exhibit C 007 PLANNINGCOMMISSION TENTATIVE1 8961 — Y RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LL January 28, 2015 Page drainage iv into BrittanyL . is was achieved redesigning the pad elevations of Lots 5, 6, andso that these lots will no longer drain entirely into the right-of-way, but ill drain partiallyinto the right-of-way as well as partially it - itch adjacent to the equestrian trail located t the rear of theselots. Per Exhibit D (as submittedy the applicant), the proposeddrainage ing diverted into the v- itch located the rear of Lots 5, 6, and 7 is less than the existing r in that is currently being divertedto the southeast corner of the subject property. Therefore, staff finds the redesign o be acceptable. second concern expressed— h—erevised map also addresses these nc r s. Multiple y the neighboring residents at lots, including Lots 3 and , were designedto have lower pad the November 1 , 2014, I ins than the previousdesign of the map, thereby, Planning isin hearing integrating the design of the future Its more seamlessly into involved what the surrounding the adjacent community. By doing this,the applicantto property owners consider a lack able to redistribute the location of slopes throughout the tract. of consistency with the existing For example, Lot 3 was previously designed with' slopes surrounding residential I the entirestreet frontage of this parcel along the south development. i includes n s# property lines. By lowering erin the conceptual conceptual l v ti ns elevation on this lot, the applicants able to drastically relative the r r of reduce the slopes Ion he front andmost of the corner side the lots and the slopes adjacent yard, i helps achieve or compatibility wi the to the right-of-way. design of the adjacenti orho . Lastly, by redistributing the l es,the applicant was ablecreate better driveway design it less of a slope, s shown on Exhibit ( ), the applicant has designedthe conceptual grading of the site taking into consideration the location slope f future driveways. . Lot 3 containeddepth of 187.5 The applicant reconfigured the map to lengthen the depth of feet, which was not in Lot 3 to 200 feet. All lots are nowin compliancei conformance it required lot development standards as indicated in the depth i standard of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 200 t for lots wfth In Low Residential L) District specified in the Development CONCLUSION: For a detailedanalysis of the proposed subdivision,_history of the neighborhood meetings and Committeereviews, i s see the attacheda to November 12, 2014, (Exhibit A). Based on the information listed above, staff ultimately finds the revised iv Tract Map SUBTT18961 to be an overall better design, as well as to be in compliance i the required City standards. Way 008 PLANNINGk TENTATIVET MAP SUBTT18961 --TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC Page Respectfully submitted, n y Planning it for Attachments: x i it Planning ission Staff Report dated November 12, 2014, With attached exhibits Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit - Conceptual Grading Plan" Exhibit Hydrology Map Exhibit - Pad Elevation Exhibit - Petition Letter Draftof ti Approval for Tentative Tr 1 1 with Conditions of Approval RP - 009 STAFF RFPoRT PLANNING T November 12, 2014 : Chairman and Members of the PlanningCommission FROM: Candyce Burnett, PlanningDirector Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 8961 -TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC- request to subdivide one existing . - cr r I into rc l within st n. Overlay f thq Very Low ( L) Residential Zoning District located t the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany1 it Street-APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (in-Fill Development Projects) of the California vir i liAct and the Ci!y CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: recommends that t I niCommission approve Tentative rl Map 1 through the adoptionf the attached ResolutionApproval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Prolect Density 1.67 dwellingunits/acre B. Surrounding Land Use and_ in . North - Single-Family Rei c sEquestrian v rl y of ) Residential Zoning is South - Single-Family Resi c - Equestrianv rl y of the Very L O Residential Zoning District East - Floyd M. Starklementary School - Equestrian OverlayLow (VQ Residential inDistrict West - Single-Family Residences - EquestrianOverlay f the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoningi ric C. General Plan w s. rc i -Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - . Very LowResidential s - Schools West - Very Low Residential D. Site h r ct ri ics.The 4.75-acresite, located at the northeast corner of SapphireStreet Brittany Lane, is rectangular In ith approximately 320 feet of street frontage adjacentt Sapphire reet and a depth of 665 feet. The site'sstreet frontage alongit r i partially improved wit southbound drivinglane and currently does not Include curb, gutter, parkway or sidewalkimprovements. This propertys an existingsingle-family residence located in thet of the parcel.The land generallyIfrom north to southcontains multiple s thats residence as welI as light ground vegetation throughout remainder f the property. site is surroundedsouth and west by existing single-family residences, is surrounded t by FloydStork Elementary I. [p rimy 010 PLANNING COMMISSION T TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 8961 —TRACEY RASZEWSIKIF I , LL November 12, 2014 Page A. General: The project involves the subdivision of a 4.75-acreparcel into 7 lots for future residential v 1 . Two of the its are proposedv frontage adjacentto Sapphire Street, and the other five its will be adjacent to the proposedl- -s c. The site is located within the Equestrianv rl y of the e - o L) Residential Zoning District, which requires subdivisions to havei of 2 dwelling units per acre, an averagelot size of 22,500 square n minimum lot size of 20,000 square t.This raj involves the creation o lots ranging in size from 1,7 to 40,000 squareit y r lot size of 26,270square feet. The projectdensity is 1.67 dwellingunits per acre. Per Section 17.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga ev to ( ), the VIL Residential District also requires all lots to have a minimumet, comer lots to have a minimumwidth of 100 feetn interior lots to have a minimumwidth f 90 feet. This project compliesit s requirements. r RCDC Section17.70.040, all residential v l t located in the City's Equestrian Overlayis required to include n equestrian trail system. Sincei tract is located i i Equestrian Overlay, it incorporates 15-foot wide trail that is adjacent to all proposed I along t n oft project area, is Is required a maintained y ch property owner within the tract. The trail will have a vehicular e s i t at the northwestcorner of the parcel, adjacent to Sapphire Street, and will connect to an existingtrail located adjacento the southeast rn r of the parcel. In additionto the equestrianeasement, a 4-foot Wide drainage easement ! rovi a In order to properlyi t il- c drainage a . The site was designedit ising topography of the property.The conceptual grading plan indicates the perimeter of some of the lots will containvarious slopes. Retainingwalls are not proposed t this time, but may be necessaryin the future dependingthe size n placement f the a s well as the front and rear yard si s. Lots 5 thru 7 contain v ri size slopes adjacent to the drainagefacilities to the rear portion of these lots. Additional grading y be necessary to allow for adequate access to be providedthese lots n the equestrian trail and will be reviewed during the design review r swhich is required rior to residential development on these lots. Development of the site ill require street improvements ion itStreet and Brittany Lane as well as # r io of a new cul-de-sac ( ri n o ), which will run off of Brittany Lane and have length of approximately200 feet. Per the EngineeringDepartment's review the submittedplans, Sapphire Street (Collector Street) as well as BrittanyBrittany Court (Local Streets) t the City's street standards. Lastly, since the site doescontain v r l trees throughout ri ril the northwest portion o the parcel, staff is including condition that will require r Removal Permit to be approved for the removal of any heritagetree,which the Development Code definesy tree in excess of thirty feet ( ') in heightin single trunk i t r of twenty inches ( "), prior to the issuance of a gradingr i . A neighborhood meetin for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18961 was conducted to gather input comments from theowners of the surrounding r i iin 660 feet of the site. The meetings held in the multipurposeroom I r Elementary c ol, located f the proposedsubdivision at 5646 Jasper r t o Wednesday, August 2 , 2014. The followingis a list of questions that wereraised by the attending residents regarding the proposed r j t: 011 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1 1 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LL November 1 1 Page QUESTIONS --RESPONSES 1 Several years ago we experiencedapplicant's engineer, Rob Otte, stated that their drainage r lems where there is objective is to not negatively Impact any surrounding an existing catch-basin in the properties. stated that thisnwould be Brittany Lane cul-de-sac, which brought up withthe PlanningEngineering caused flooding round the Departments to ensuret there drainage improvements it { drainage issues. the front yard r ill the drainage produced y this r j caffect properties located within cul-de- sac are concerned that the homes The applicant'srepresentative, Mrs. Raszewski ill not be consistent wit r explained that the projectonly involves subdividing one neighborhood. o large r rl into seven parcels and does not involve houses k are proposedrequest to construct houses. She alsodo that do y look IIke? the City has specific i requirements, Including standardrequires 25 percent of all proposed single-family detached unitssingle-story units,for future ro ose res ena eveto men . not want the projectto The project planner explained that the propertyi eliminate view that we currently question is located i i the Very Low Residential have, because we believei { t ' , which allows for half-acre lot single-family reduce the value f our homes.Will residential { ith a maximum height of 35 future obstruct my view? t. Staff also explainedthat the City currently does not have an ordinance in placerestrictIregulate develop nt from obstructingexisting views. homeowner4, The located south s ski explained that they currently t adjacentand to Lot 7 inquired have l to Install fencing site, but futurefencing t may be should r company o forward r osfuture constructed ai r northern developmentill meet the City'sfencing property line. requirements ill work withneighbors to address their concerns. . Can the pad elevations for each lot Mrs. Raszewski explained that the applicant's civil be lowered? engineering has only provided the conceptual grading elevations for each It, which may slightly change when the size future r r in . She stated thatt r grading ill not be a depa rtur from the sitesexisting topography f the site. She also indicated t the proposedlot elevations aredesigned to maintain acceptable drainages, second neighborhoodtin I Tuesday, ct r 21, 2014 at Floyd M. Stork Elementary I. The intent of this meeting was to followup withsurrounding resi is and explain ro roccurred since first neighborhood meeting. The applicant -explained to alI attending residents that the City'sc is 1,Trails Advisorysin Review Committees rvi this project recommending that the projectbrought to the Planning i si n for review. li t noted that the project'scivil engineer, Rob Otte, workedhad i the City'sn i ri n to resolve concerns regarding r i impacts to the residential tract south oft u j r the Engineeringt, P t4m,MA, 012 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LL November 1 Page 4 condition has been added to the attachedii f approval requiring the applicantt provide calculations install appropriate additional drainage Inlet ilitidetermined by the CityEngineer att n f Brittany Lane. In additionto theneighborhood meeti s, residents, ring both support opposition, contacted y phone. Most inquiries re directed towards the size and design of homes that could ilt on the proposedlots, Staff responded the site is located wit i the Very Low si t! I District that allowsfor half-acre lot, single-family residential v 1 nt. This istrict requires specific developmentstandards that all lots t comply with, such as a maximumi allowance xi lot coverage ll nc f 25 percent, and setbacks specified in Section 17.36 of the Development Code. StaffIexplained that the City's Development Code requires r s residential v l o through review process, similar to the process that this r is currently going through, so that the City can review r i cr 1 styles II as buildingplacements. r resident stated y were in the processof assemblingtits i project lti t l stating that he felt this subdivision would not be consistent with # isti surrounding dev to . e also feared ture development oft is site ul lower the propertyvalue f his home, located just southof the proposedivision, and eliminatei current view ins. Staff1 i the propertyIn review is within a zoning i ri that allowed for half-acre lot residential v l n is also consistent wi the General Plan land use designationfor is area,As of the preparationf this report,the Planningn not yet received n written statements in support or opposition of this project. C. Technical n_-- E n Review Committee: The Technical and Design Review Committees reviewed r j ct on September , 2014, No issues wereraised and the o s recommended r v l of the proposedsubdivision to the PlanningIs i s D. Trails AdvisiDo i : The Trailsvis i reviewed roj on October 8, 2014. following is a list of questions asked by the n responses discussed during this ti -QUESTIONS RESPONSES 1. Does Lot 2 have sufficientapplicant's engineer, Rob Otte, agreedit the access to the equestriantrail it concern r to revise the map along the rear of the lot? to allowr adequate trail access for Lot 2attached tractIndicates that the map was revised to provide Lot 2 withua raiE c s I n r r lot i . Is - itc r inage along Mr. Otte explainedt the trail adjacent V-ditch has the trail adequate to serve adequates!ope and connection. He alsoexplained that this tract? the V-ditch was recently revised, r staffs direction, from havingf 12 inches and a widthf 2.5 feet to having of 6 inches nd a width of 4 feet.This ad'usted to create r trail experience. 3. When ill the trail adjacent Staff explainedt upon futureresidential development block WallsInstalled? of the site, I II will be reviewed y staff as well s the DesignReview i r i i Il ilI a sidewalk be builtto r. Otte explainedthe projectill incorporate SapphireStreet? improvements to it Street that will Include the installation of a si I . ffam n,_ 013 PLANNINGL I STAFF TENTATIVE —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC November 1 1 Page 5 5. Will doCble gates be installed explained t double gates will be a condition t the rear of each lot? I on anyr residential v l t of the site. 6. How ill vehicular c x l i that the applicant'sn i r had provided t Sapphire Streetrecently provided staff withgraphic showing their plan for the trail? to providedrive r n oats at the intersection of Sapphit tr r accesstthe tr il. Following isussi , staff presentedlist of conditions that wouldmitigate the concerns of the committee, hich are Included in the conditions of approval attached to this report. The Committeerecommended approval of the proposedsubdivision i ni Commission. E. EnvironmentalAssessment: The Planningn t s determined that the projectIs categorically x t from the requirements li i Environmental Quality Act( ) and the City'si li s, The project qualifies under as a Classtin under Statei li Section 1 (in-Fill DevelopmentProjects) because the project meets all of the requirements to in the CEQA Guidelines, r j c Is consistent with the applicable r l plan and zoningdesignation and regulations, whl II s for a density of two dwelling units per acre. The proposedv i t occurs within City limits on a project site ore than five acres substantially u on r s, Based on field visits Rapidand a nviron l Constraints Analysis ( ) prepared by MIG on May 1, 2014 (Exhibit ), the project site hasn value habitat for endangered, rr or threatened species, StaffI determined that approval of the project would not result In any significant s relating to tr rc, noise, air quality, or water quality. Furthermore, the site can be adequately served y all required iliapublic services. Implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, s the Migratoryit ct, there is no substantial vi c that the projectv significant effect on nviron . This Item was advertised as a public hearing In the Inland Valley ily Bulletin s r, the propertyse notices re mailed to all property owners within - ot radius of the r site. 4lRespectfy s i 't Planning it c r CB:DPlIs Attachments. Exhibit A—Aerial Exhibit --Site Utilization Exhibit —Tentative Tract Exhibit —Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit — Design Review Committeecomments Exhibit F--Trails viary Committee comments Exhibit G--Neighborhood Meeting ' is Lion and reports Exhibit H —Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis Draftlui n of Approval for Tentative Tr 1 8961 with Conditions of Approval itam ma 014 RESOLUTION . 15-03 RESOLUTION I I I F THE CITY RANCHO , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1 8961,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDEEXISTING 4.75-ACRE PARCEL INTO 7 PARCELS WITHINTHE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY OF THE VERY L ) RESIDENTIAL ZONING I ! T, LOCATED ATTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAPPHIRE STREETAND BRITTANY LANE AT 5615 I TMAKING FINDINGS I - : 10 1- 1-0 . A. Regftlis. 1. Holke, LLC filed an application for the approval of TentativeTract Map1 8961, as described In the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Maprequest is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of November 2014, the PlanningCommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to an unspecified date. 3. On the 2 th day of January 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded sal hearing n that date. . All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga follows; 1 is Commission hereby specifically ends that all of the facts set forth In ecitals, Part A, of thisResolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence sent to this Commission during the above-referenced above-referenced public hearing n January , 2015, Including written and o l staff repoft together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically nds as follows: a. The application applies to a 4.7 c site, located at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and BrittanyLane, Is rectangular In shape with approximately 320 feet of street frontage adjacent to SapphireStreet and a depthfeet, This property has an existing single-family residenc located In the northwest ua rant of the parcel.The land generallyslopes from north to south and contains multiple trees that surround the residence as well as light round vegetation rou hot the remainder of the property; and b. The property Is located within the Very Low L) Residential Zoning is and Is surrounded to the north, south, and westexisting half-acre single-family,development that Is also within the Very Low ) Residential Zoning District. The property Is bordered to the by Floyd M. StorkElementary cool; and 015 PLANNING COMMISSION RE L INO. 1 - TENTATIVE 1 8961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HIKE, LL January 28, 2015 Page c. The project Involves the subdivision of a 4.75-acre parcel Into 7 parcels for future residential development. The site Is located within the Equestrian Overlayof the Very-Low L) Residential Zoning District, which requires subdivisions to have a maximum "of 2 dwelling units per acre, an average lot size of 22,500 square feet and a minimumlot size of 20,000 square feet. This project involves the creation of lots ranging in size from 21,780 to 40,000 square feet with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet, The project density is 1.67 dwelling units per acre. Per Section 17.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code( ), the VL Residential Distdct also requires all lots to have a minimumdepth of 200 feet, corner lots to have a minimum width of 10 feet, and interior lots to have a"minimum width of 90 feet. This project complies with these requirements; and d. The project Incorporates a 15-foot wide trail that is adjacent to all proposed lots along the north and east edges of the project area.The trail will have a vehicular access point at the northwest corner of the parcel, adjacent to Sapphire Street, and will connect to an existing trail located adjacent to the southeast comer of the parcel. In addition to the equestrian easement, foot wide drainage easement is provided in order to properly divert trail adjacent drainage flows. Development of the site will require street Improvements along Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane as well as the creation of a new cul-de-sac (Brittany Court),which will run off of Brittany Lane and have a length of approximately 200 feet; and e. A neighborhood eetin for Tentative Tract Map 8 U BTT1 8961 was conducted to gather Input and comments from e owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of -the she. a meeting was held In the multipurpose room at Floyd M. StorkElementary cool, located east of the proposed subdivision at 5646 Jasper Street on Wednesday, August 20, 2014, second neighborhood tin s held on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, at'FloyStork Elementary chol. All attending residents were made aware that the City's City' Technical, Trails Advisory,and Design Review Commfttees reviewed this project.The applicant also explained that the project civil engineer had worked with the Ci Engineering Services Department to resolve concerns regarding ina a Impacts. f. The Technical ` and Design ReviewCommittees reviewed the project o September 2, 2014, and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on October 8, 2014, The Committee co ended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. g. This application was advertised as a public hearing on November 12, 2014, and January 28, 2015, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property as posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a B foot radius of the project site. . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: . The tentative tract Is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, The proposed project Is to subdivide the site into 7 parcels, In accordance with the Equestrian Overlay of the Very-Low L)Residential Zoning District and Very Low General Plan land use designation; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. This project involves the creation of 016 PLANNINGIS IRESOLUTION 15-0 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 8961 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC January 28, 2015 Page lotsranging In size from 21,780 to 40,ODOsquare feet with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet. The project density is 1.67 dwelling units per acre.The VL Residential District also requires all lots to have a minimum depth of 200 feet, comer lots to have a minimum h of 100 feet, and interior lots to have a minimum width of 90 feet. This project complies with requirements specified in the Development Code; and C. The site Is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. The subdivision will comply with City standards including the minimum lot area and dimensions requirements. The project density Is 1.67 dwelling units per acre, which Is within the allowable maximumof 2 dwellingunits per acre; and d. The design of the subdivision Is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable Injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Based on field`visit$ and Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis ( ) prepared by MIG on May 1 201 ,the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare,or threatened species; and e. The tentative tract Is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed project Is to subdivide the site Into 7 individual parcels, The subdivision project does not involve proposed development of the site at this time; and f. The design of thetentative tract will not conflict with any easements acqui y the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property doesnot contain any easements that would affect the ability to subdivide the site for future residential development. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project Is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California'Environmental Quality A ( ) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (in-Fill Development Projects) because the project meets all of the requirements `stated In the CEQA Guidelines. The project Is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designation and regulations,which allows for a density of 2 dwellingunits per acre.The proposed development occurs thin City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres u tanti lly surrounded by urban uses. In addition, based on field visits; and a Rapid Environmental Constraints Analysis( C ) prepared y MIG on May 1, 2014,'the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species:'Staff has alsodetermined" that approval f the' ` project wouldnot 'result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, hydrology/drainage or water quality. Furthermore, the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. With implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, such as=the Migratory Bird Act, there'Is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment and prior to-any action being taken for the requested subdivision approval, concurs In the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusionsset forth in Paragraphs 1, 2. 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this'reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 017 PLANNINGI IRESOLUTION NO. 1 - 3 TENTATIVE 1 —TRACEY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LL January , 2015 Page ADOPTEDAPPROVED AND THIS T Y OF JANUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION F THE CITY Y: ' ven I Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST. 'A 664� n Y78 relft, Secretary 1, Candyceof the PlanningCommission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, herebydo certify that the foregoingsolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the PlanningCommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, regular meeting the PlanningCommission held on the 28th day of January 2015, the followingvote-to-wit: COMMISSIONERS: FLE7CHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ® OAXACA COMMISSIONERS: o COMMISSIONERS: L ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 018 Conditions —Community Davelopment Department Project 7 1 Projecte: Holke,LLC-T Lot Subdivision Location: 5815 SAPPHIRE ST-1081691 Oo Project : lentative Tract Map 1. The applicant all be required pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The pr0JW planner will confirm whiches apply to this projecL All checks are to be made payable to the Clerka Board Supervisorsand submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. Notice of Exemption- 50 . The applicant shall agree to defendt his sole expense any action brought against the City, agents, officers, oremployees, use of the Issuance f such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish u approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, , oremployees, r any Court costs and ey's fees which the City, 114 agents, l e may be required y a court to pay as a result of suchaction. The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defensey such action but such a cip tion shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this 3. Copies of the signed Planning a i i l d Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18951 with applicableConditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on ft-plans (full Sim). The sheet(5) are for 'Information onlyall parties Involved I n the construct)on/grading activitiesand are not required to be wet al by a licensed Engineer/Architact. 4. This tentative tract map or tentative pamel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, nl s a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within years from the date of the approval. . Approval of thisrequest shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Piaand/or Master Plans In effect t the time of BuildingPermit Issuance. • Any proposed Covenants, Conditions, and ResMc*ms (C ) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals a nin requirements r the keeping of sold animals have been met. Individual lot owners In subdivisions shall have the option of keeping saidanimals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments t o the C s. Pdnted; WIV2015 WWW.C140MMUS 019 Project SUBTrIB961 Project Name: ol , LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: Sal 5 SAPPHIRE106169104-0000 1 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJZCT.- .;Planning 7.- Any proposedan Conditions, and Restrictions ( s) and Articles Incorporation o e o Association subject approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City ey. They shall be recordedFinal Map or prior to the Issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be providedto the City Engineer. The oAssociation shall sub it to the Planning Departmentlist of the name and address of their offlcers on or beforeJanuary 1 of each and every year and whenever said Information a es. 8. Prior to Issuance of a buildingpermit, plans shbll be submitted and approved by the Planning Department that provide a t t or 12-fbot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximumslope o :1 and minimum width of 10 feet Corral locations must meet proximity requirements all be consistent with Section 17.88 of the Development Code(Animal Regulations). 9. Future lop ent of the site shall be In accordance with the conditions contained hereinand the Development Coda regulations for the Equestrian Overlay of the Very L)Residential District. 10. _Prior to recordation of the final map, the local feeder trail shall be Installed. Local feeder trail entrances shall also provideaccess for service vehicles, such veterinarians or hay deliveries, Including 124bot minimumdrive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided t equestrian accessis maintained through step-throughs In concept with EngineeringServices Department Standard1 and 1 7- . 11. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for distance 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the Drainage devices may be requiredit and Safety Official. 1 . Prior to Issuance a building permit, a fenceand wall plan shall be submitted nd approved by the Planning Department. Where comer side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent local equestrian lis, construct minimum t high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-Mee double sided block, 'slump ' or an alternative material that Is acceptable to the Designw Committee. This material shall be consistentdevelopment. The walls on each lot shall be located Interior to the equestrian and drainage easements. 1 . Prior to any use of the projectsite or businessactivity being commencedthereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the PlanningManager. 14._Prior to Issuance building a plans shall be submitted and approved by the 'Planning Department Indicating t o bridge will be provided over the V-ditch where the drainage easement i adjacent to rear and side yard access gates to allow each lot adequate access to the equestrian trails. 15. Approval Is for the subdivision of one existing 4.7 -acre1 into 7 parcels withine Equestrian v rl of the Very L L) Residential Zoning Districtlocated at the northeast comer of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphiret- : 10 1 1-04, Pftd*d,112&2015 www.Cftyv1RC.La Pop 2d 13 020 Project Project e: Holke, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5815 SAPPHIRE ST- 106 1 1Q QQ Project : Tentative ct map ALL OF ME FOLLOKING COND177ONS APPLY TO YOUR PROjECr.- . Planning DeggirtMe t 16. Any proposals r development within the Project Prolect site shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior tD construction. 17. Prior to Issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted and approvedy the Planning Department Indicating that gate access will be providedto the rear of all adjoininglots the equestriantrail. private 1 . Prior to recordation of the final map, all trail adjacent drainage facilities must be installed and shall have a depth no greater than 0 Inches. 19.__Prior to grading and/or construction, _ the applicant shall consult with a qualified to determine a beat means (such as trapping, barriers, relocation, etc.) for controlling e migration of animalsonto neighboringproperties while the site Is being graded and homes are being constructed. The applicant all then submit a report Indicating l O will be used, and Implement accordingly. 20.-Per Development Code Section 17.16.000, Prior to Issuance it for the development of this site a tree removal permit shall be requiredfor the removal of any onsite heritagee. 21. Prior to Issuance grading permit the site shall be In an with the Migratory Bird 22. Prior to the Issuance of a grading permft, Per Development Code Section17.15.080 a Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained fbr the removal of any heritage trees onsite. ine2rWgIervicet 1. Per City Driveway Policy, driveways on Sapphiret* a Tollectorn street, shall have circular or hammerhead drtveways. 2. Lot 2 to maintainon both Brittanye and Sapphire t, If Lot 2 has a wail along Sapphire Street, It shall be at least a5 feet behind the sldeW81k andprovide access for homeowner maintenance of the Sapphire y. Note on the public Improvement plans that private landscaping and irrigation systems shall be Installed In the parkways of Lot 2, prior to occupancy of said lot, • Brittany Lane (including a now cul-de-sac) frontage Improvements to be in accordance with C ity "Local Streer standards, as required, Including and gutter, asphalt pavement sidewalk, ADA access ramps,drive approaches,LED streetlightsand street trees. . Provide 5800 Lumens LED streellighN as required. . Provide traffic signing and striping.as required,Including Stop Sign, Limit Line and Stop Legend. c. Revise existing street Improvement plans Drawing1317, as required y the CityEngineer. . Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall be designed to prevent blockage with Infrequent homeowner maintenance. Use Standard Drawing107-B for 12-inch or larger private drainagefacility. Pdnlat 112 13 www.C*1cfRC.us Pape 3 W 13 021 Project# 18961 Project Name: Holke,LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST- 108169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING COMMONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Enallneerina Service- ft---&—ent 4. The new cul-de-sac shall Intersect Brittany Lane radial to the existing centerfine curve. The centerline radius on the now cut ar. shall be at least 300 feet consistent with the Street Design Policy. 5. Sapphire Street frontage improvements to be In accordance with City "Cap ector Streer standards, as required, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp, cross gutter, drive approaches, LED streetlights and street tress. a. Provide drive approach for vehWar access to private local it along the no tract boundary. Also, provide a curbside In outlet(s) through the street rIght-of-way for private drainage factilty(s) acUanent to trail. Where a downsbeam and of a trail meets a street, the M shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surrace debris onto the sidewalk/street. Inlet to the curbside drain outlet shall bedesigned to prevent blockage with Infrequent homeowner maintenance. b.City Standard Drawing No. 1 00-A is for 4 Inch A.C. over CAB.for a CRY Collector. a. Provide MOO Lumens LED streedights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping,as required. e. Revise existing street Improvement plans, DrwMnU No. 1713,as required by the City Engineer. B. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, all be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the Be kV electrical) an the project side of Sapphire Street shall be underground In the entire project frontage, extending to the first pole off site (north and south), prior to public Improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Ali services crossing Sapphire Street shall be undargrounded at the same fime. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the Cfty adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as It occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public Improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate, B. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or Issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. 9. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pdor to Building Permit Issuance If no map Is Involved. Pdntad C us U=2015 WWW.CKYUR Pap 4 of 13 022 projectU Project Name. Hole LL -7 Lot Subdivision Location: 6815 SAPPHIRE ST-1 61 1 0 Project Type: Tentative Tracta CONDITIONSALL OF THE FOLLOWING i _ r 1 . Prior to theIssuance of Building Permits, Diversion Deposit and related administrative s shag id a Construction and Demolition Diversion Program.y e deposit Is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated du construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, a appropriate documentation is provided to . Form CD-1 shall a submitted to the Engineering Services ent when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering e s Department within 60 days followingthe completion of the construction an or demolition project. . 11._Dedication shag be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured m street centerline). 30 total feet on Brittany Lane 30 total feet an y Court 12. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated e City for all Interior public community ils, public pasece, public landscape a c signal encroachment an maintenance, and public drainage facilities s shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements r non-public l (cross-lot I e, local er trails, etc.) shag be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 13. Comer property line cutoft shall be dedicated per City Standards. 1 . Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted an a final map. 1 . All existing easements lying within future rights-Of-way shall be quit-dalmed or delineated on the final map. 16. l public improvements (interior streetE4 drainage cilifi , community` trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, l street lights,and street trees. 17. _Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.37.010, no person shall make connections from a sou rce of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which Is regulated y technical codes and for whichpermit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements ul d by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted Council, except that In developments con ii more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made In equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined y the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe' maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements require b these conditions of development approval. Pflntm immis PaP.-6 of 13 023 Pmject SUBT1718961 ProJectName: Holke,LL -7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE108169104-0000 1 ProjectTentative PROJECT.- MagInggring jervices - 18. Construct the followinget r street Improvements including, but not limited t : Sapphire et Curb&Gutter Pavement Sidewalk Drive Street Lights Street Trees ADA Access P 19. Construct the following peri r street Improvements Including,but not limited to. - Brittany n Curb&Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach StreetLights Street Trees ADA Access P 20, Construct the following ri er street Improvements Including, t not limited to.- Brittany Court Curb&Gutter Pavement StreetSidewalk Drive Approach Lights Street Trees Pdnted,V2612015 M 024 Project 1 1 ProJectName: --Hie, LL -7 Lot Subdivision Location: -5615 SAPPHIRE ST-1 1 1 ProJecte: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLL OVWNG CONDMONS APPLY TO YOUR PRoiECT.- 2 . Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title P998 Of the streetip ve nt plans. Street Improvement shall include a line item withinthe construction legend stating: "Skeet trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in thosea s shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans. Sapphire Botanical Name a chinensis Common -Chinese Pistache Min.Grow Space-6' Spacing-50, i - 15 gallon Construction_ of for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted In accordance withstandard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic !Is report shall be furnished City inspector. Any unusual tOxicitles or nutrient deficienciesa uire backfill soil amendments s determined by the City Inspector. ' 3)AR street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services DepartmenL Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only. 2 . Install strest trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (b Blow) and construction notes shall appear on the tie page of the street Improvement plans. Street Improvement plans shall Include a line i e construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on Sheet pul land s required, (typically h 1)." Where in 1! o t shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans. Brittany Lane Including now cul-de-sac) Botanical Name-Plawus is Commone-London Plane Tree i .Grow Spa -T Spacing-401 O.C. Size-15 gallon Construction Notes for Street es: 1)All street trees are to be planted In nce with City standardla Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soit p 8 be furnished to the City Inspector. Any unusual toxicitles or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, s determined by the City Inspector. II street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Pftf&112 15 .0 c. Page 8 of 13 025 a Project 1 Project e: Holke,LL -T Lot Subdivision Location: 1 ! - 1 1 1 Oo Project Type: Tentative Tritelt Map CONDITIONSALL OF THE FOLLOWING . g laineering 21. Improvement Plans and Construction, a. Street improvement l s, Including t trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved e City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing pletio of the public or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of Building' Permits,whichever occurs first. . Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the EngineeringServices et In ddit n to any other required. c. Pavement striping. marking, c signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit s all be Installed a satisfaction of the City Engineer. .'Signal nuit with pull boxes shall be'Installed now constructionor reconstruction project a!ong major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect irin . Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at Intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart unless otherv4se specified e City Engineer. )Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanizedl with pull rope or as specified. a. Access ramps r the disabled shall be Installedon all comers of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer, Existingf. City madsrequiring n` n shall remain open to trafflc at all times adequate detoursduring construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit -shall be provided to coverin and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated ina a flows shall rlot cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed City Standards,except for single-family reside l lots. h.Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Pdffled WN0157 of 13 026 Project it SUBTT18961 Project Name: Holke, LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5815 SAPPHIRE sT- i6alegi 64-5555 Project Type: -Tentative Tract Map— ALL. OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPL Y TO YOUR PROjECT. M-02 artment 24. Provide separate uU[Ity services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, as, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 25.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 28. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to Most the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVVVD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DistrIA and the Environmental Health Department of the Courdy of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD Is required prior to final meP app�mval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs W. Such letter must have been Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval In the case of subdivision or prior to the Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pmlects. 27. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies Involved. Approval oft final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -X- A 28. Provide calculations and Install appropriate additional drainage Inlet facilities as determined by the City Engineer at the south end of Brittany Lane. & rJM&ALJe0_2_n 1. Prior to recording the Final Map the applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Department a Grading and Drainage Plan for approval and a permit for the private cross-lot drainage and equestrian trails, and the applicant shall Install the equestrian ball improvements and shall Install the GTss lot drainage devices adjacent to the equestrian trails and along the westerly property line of Lot 3. 2. Prior to the recording the Final Map the City of Rancho CucamongEes "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Ouality Management Plan"'shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders office. 3. Prior to the development of each lot, each lot shall have a topographic survey completed prior to submittal to the Planning Department for an entitlement on sold lot(s). 4. As future development occurs for each lot, should the applicant for a lot choose to use a dMerent storm water quality treatment Best Management Practices (BMP) device other then what Is described in the recorded Final Project-Speclitc Water Quality Management Plan, the applicants civil engineer of record shall prepare a priority water quality management plan for that lot to be Included as an appendix to the recorded Final PrOJect-Specific; Water Quality Management Plan. The civil engineer of record shall sign and seal the document and the document shall be signed by the owner of the property. 5. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the recordation of the final map a final project-specific at Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. PMWd.WWD15 WNW.CftYG1RC,Us Pap 1)of 13 027 Project SUBTT1189611 Project Name: Holke,LLC-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST-10616910"000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ritgdIng leggall 6. If the depths of the Infiltration pits is 1 0-feat or greater below grade the land owner shall pmvlde an inspection report by a qualified personicompany on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described In the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground Infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 7. Prior to Issuance of a wall permit on engineered combination garden/retaining wells along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope Is not present). 8. Prior, to Issuance of a wall permik a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be Included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 9. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross4ot drainage, (except In approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be Installed prior to final map approval. 10. Flow lines steeper then 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and sweles whom concentrated flows exceed 31ps,and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 11. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 12. In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4' is DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, at to corrals, S< 5% cross fail 2%, S>5% cross fall 4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively: Sol for 4% to 6%, 40' for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trall changes, L . a steep downhill slope which will use additionale sion to the trall. 13-h If the storm water treatment Infiltration pits are ID-feet or deeper below the surface of the ground the land owner shall provide an Inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described In the Storm Water Quality Management an prepared for the subject project. Ali costs associated with the underground Infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 14. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan'shall be recorded prior to the recordation of the final map. 15. Prior to the Issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. .0 C PflnWd,1126=15 WWWKy0R .t0 PVe 10 of 13 028 Project#- BUBTT18961 Project Name: Hoike,I-I-C-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE ST-106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOKING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROjECT.- I* rg adI139Jftcyon 16. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit and In accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, If a lot may not directly drain off ske directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trall), then; a) drainage may now from only one lot onto only one other lot b) a drainage easement shall <be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; C) the drainage shall be contained within either a concratelrock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess CeP8cItY to out for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 1 00-year slorrn event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 1 -inches. 17. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit for any lot or lots, the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 18. The land owner shall provide an Inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 'The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP0s) as described in the to Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground Infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 19. If the depft of the Infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) th the Faclit ID Number assigned to 9 y Services Department Official prior to Issuance of the Grading Permit Building and Safet wI Y th 20. Grading of the subject property shall be Inaccordance with current adopted Cali mia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be In substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 21. A solls report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan sub for review. Planashall Implement design recommendations per said report 22. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualifled Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application fbr Grading and Drainage Plan review. 23. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed. submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Offi" or to the Issuance of building permits. 24. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal Is required for all new construction projects and for exIsUng buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and I. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 25. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measure's and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the Issuance of a grading permit. Pr1A1*d4 1r=015 WWW.C14m1RC.us Pop 19 of 13 029 Project SUBTT118961 Project Name: Hoke,LI-C-7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5015 SAPPHIRE ST-106169104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF 774E FOU OWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- 1, rg v-ding Section 26. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permft are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shelf be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage la it. 27. A drainage study showing a 1OD-year, AMC 3desIgn storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-sits storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 28. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-ske drainage easements prior to the Issuance of a grading permlL 29. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 30. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 31. Private sewer, water, and storm drain Improvements will be designed per the, latest' adopted California Plumbing Code. 32. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 33. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 34. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided In the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"I on for Grading Plans and Permir. 35. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting Is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call Into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least I worldng day In advance to request the following grading Inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; 11) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to Issuance of the building permit, 111) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner all submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Solis Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports x4411 be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the Issuance of a building permit. Pdnw:KNO15 WwcWPRC.U8 Pop 12 0113 030 Project Project e: Holke, LL 7 Lot Subdivision Location: 5615 SAPPHIRE -1061-69104-0000 Project Type: Tentadve tract ALL OF THE FOLLOMNG CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROjECT.- . PrIor to the Issuance Of the Certificate of Occupancythe engineer f record shall certify the functionality storm water quality management C } plan ) management practices 7. The Water Quality ManagementPlan ) shall Include a copy of the project i ons of Approval. Prior311. to recordation f the final map the applicant shall provide to Buildingand Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamongas Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management I n for review pdor to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement fbr Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to Issuance a grading it. ®112V2015 WWW.CkVRC.U8 Page 13 0113' 031 PRIVATE 15, LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL r SPLIT RAIL POSTTO CHAIN GATE OPEN 20® GATE WITH STEP`THROUGH �� SOIL SURFACE RADIUS OF 6' 20°FROP�h CURE FACE fiEACH SIDEO BARRICADE 'LOCK PALL MOW STRIP PLANTER AREA t") -PLANTER AREA CONCRETE HEADER TRAIL PARKWAY PVC FENCE CONCRETE DRIVE 'CU RB STREETTREES APPROACH 17 MIN. STREET PER CITY OF R.C. STD.DWG, 101- 2 METAL PLATE TO STOP THE GATE FROM SWINGING INTO THE PUBLIC R.O. „THICK METAL `AP.AND 7„ PROVIDE SUPPORT TO GATE. PLATE WELDED FENCE POST TO UPRIGHT PIPE O 0LOCK WALL FLAT STEEL PLATE TO BE ALLOWS DATE LOCK ALL ' EL TO TOP OF POST. PIPE TO SLIDE 10 6„ UNDER 4®a I STEP THROUGH,SEE TO.DWG. 1007B Lo I I 16z° I I Locli B 17 Ifs ffi m WEL0 114„METAL PLATE a FOR SUPPORT. FILL POST YYITFI CONCRETE, 12W FILL POST WITH CONCRETE. NOTES: Ln 1. ATE CONSTRUCTEDOF 2 31 "OALVANI ED STEEL PIPE. w 2.HINGE CREATED Y WELDING CROSS M E S TO A 2 7/8'GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SLEEVE WITH CAP SLIPPED OVER UPRIGHT CARTE POST .SING POSTS GATE SMALL NOT SWING INTO PUBLIC R.O.W. sex 4.CHAIN SHALL BE 318*X 1 314" 1 114„MILD STEEL AT 18„LONG ew 5.LOCK SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CI to .SEE TRAIL NOTES STD,NO, 1001 7.DATE SHALL BE PLACED MINIMUM 20'FROM CURB FACE, 91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 6kCX:. Ya s 'FEEDER TRAIL TO • STANDA D PLAN VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE ACCESS 1006—B iE FEEE DATE USE WITH ST DARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PU®LIC O KS CONS UCTION 24953 SHEET I OF 1 Exhibit D 032 GREATER THAN 70" VC TRAIL FENCE END POST PER STD, DWG. 1010 10" IN. 7.5" I . VCHAMFER AT 450 2" " S"X S'CLEAR PINE POST TREATED IT CHROMATED ® COPPER ARSENATE 204-12 (GREEN BOOK)SET IN CONCRETE A" FINISH .q • .4 r •0 r 's o- a rp cv Li A . CONCRETE FOOTING CLASS 500®Ca2500 STEPTHROUGH c� co rya rr wCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA cb APPROVED BY, COMMUNITY TRAIL: PASS—THROUGH STANDARD PLAN DETAIL GREATER THAN 70 ps CITY EL RATE USE DAD SPECK TI NS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION G . 23 SET ] OF I 033 30 R Idiit s° ° „ �� a "gyp, �. I � ""•___�__"" � I � R � a P _»..��,.»�, $ I Y ._ k a f- a�r , y M alik ««RR pp ({ pp e u,... I�p B 4 D! @@ wd 6 i' p 'j- wvN m p 80 p km 8 m - �, n • $d311 -------------- IC R al GA ° p{ 4 LFLF R a 10 9^ 4 „o A u lore „ I „ 9 IIII -------------- aq 0 s". b � a I Aix 11 CIL �I 1`9 LL—i jif'olu y El _ a � ! m 71 a " AR 11 - M Eli IT EA AM E iv m 9 uz I q tee, a 4i. 8 .m s po-p M R I # 19 R 035 i t October 28,201 City of Rancho Cucamonga 1050 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 9730 : Rea Permission to Grade and Install Trail Improvements upon Property i I Dear Sir or as I hereby certify that I am the owner of propertydescribed s Lot 1 of Tract Me p No. 18961 in the City f Rancho Cucamonga.I have reviewed the attached Exhibit"A" and" " prepared y Kimley Horn an addle and Associates, and hereby agree to permit the Developer of Lots 2,3,4,5,fs and 7 of said Tract Map oa 18961 and its successors and assigns to enter upon my property to perform the trail improvements and grading and construction as shoe.This permissions all be binding upon all heirs, executors,successors and assigns having interest in all or part of my property and the grading permission and installation of all improvements shall terminate two years of the execution date below. Sincerely, 04 lAec� OC Olner Date. PIMP?see attached for CA Civil Code Section ligg c pll at ackriowledgment Notary Acknowledgement Attached g q ee..g l ►f, Exhibit F 036 t I Faa LL A - PURPOSE 99 n CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT %% i A, notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the i. identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, r validity of that document. a State lifrni } County _ O On i 1 9 before me, PaulaIslas, Notary Public ir""inzao.wia;Ono bun at the whre" personally r �Vt 9 who proved to me on the bAis. of ti f t vi �ence �be person narne(D isk&subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledgedto me that helshe4ff-e- 9)executed the same in hisifhemjIr uthor`zed capacityOFs> n that by lhis/her4Fe_l0s[gnature@ on the instrument the rs , or the entity upon behalf Of which the rs n t t the instrument. t l I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of Californiathat the foregoingparagraph Is true n rr t® � ALAIL Notary rtl® a.caftfort it WITNESSn n official sea[. son '_ rdl courtly Gonrro�`elan 21E42 . Ml Comm.E iris MR 15 2021 Notary Public Signature (Notary Public Saab ! ADDITIONAL Tl INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING TMS FORM ! I 71fa j'xarrar caesapftes wtell stta°rertt t•et;ot•sirarg nmterry'rsudtng araaf. E DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED OCUM T tf'nerded,should he contprered and attached to the deac unn nt.Acd trcahr•ed eats front other starts naat he,antic Bred foe°dociaurntr hrrng sear to that.stair so fang as the a t 9rattfing does tier require the California notary,to violate C'afifornhe t tinny lcm% Thlo ar des • t cat attached document) n State ated County information must be the State and County where the docurnent signets)personally appeared before Lisa[rotary public For acknowledgment. a Date of notarization most be the date Ebel the signer(s)personally appeared which ilv! d etlptiors of�Itedrzattsetil lltt d) must also be the sarne date the acknowledgment is completed p 'n c notary public must print his or her name as it appears v rhhin his air Isar Number of Pages _---- Document O�t� I ctrtrtms 5slon firtshsaved by a comma and their your title(notary public). print the name{s)or€lnrument sign s) who personally appear at (lie time of CAPACITY S#iltara7'9td�Rr. Y t°� SICK o indTizate the Correct singular or plural forms by Cr idnit off hicarreu fronts(s..; + Indiv°s tit IV fsla = ea l )terCirclin the correct forms.Failure to correctly indicate this tafcamaatios rusty lead to rejection of document recording. Corporate Officer 'Ilia notary scal. impression most be clear and photographically reprodtucible Imp scats roust not cover rain or Inues, If sent impression smudges,re-seal if a ( It suff'scictit sure portents,otlterovise complete a different ac:krimAcd traaatt form. 13 Partner(s) g Suirasture of the notary public must rrratch the signature on fide with ilia officc of bit county clerk. Attu ey-in®Fick Additioasal information is rim required but could help to aniane this Trustee(s) a scktro4cicdgrrsicnL a5 not misused or attached no a different document. Indicate title or type ofaatt had decorator,another of purges and date. Otheree indicate the capacity clu need by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer.indicate the tithe(r e CEO,CFO,S rcury), :fi Secarety°attach this document to the signed documcni with a sure a 037 s 4 EXHIBIT A e r, ° y } r •� • u _ b � � g i GRADNG INIIT 17 k � ' ffi ems. 1 �f ° � m e . - _ a •r �t � T S ram.... � ". ,,� �^. e.-' . . _ k .Z" t, g ` "�l r q s b r P I a This reap Is a portion of Tract No, 18961 � Rough Grading Plans prepared by Madoie and Associates,Sheet 3 of 13 dated 10.17.2019 t x 038 EXHIBIT"B TRAIL IMPROVEMENT/TRANSITION GRADING EXHIBIT t rot ® m y o g �. o� a , Tl. S # LL ,a Eat s 454 SF a' jbWCEFTU Y t I t-, OC & aiA a 21LK e t cl co �jt y '4 9 ow 0 a g� a m e