HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003/10/15 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
909 477-2700
AGENDAS
· Redevelopment Agency
· Fire Protection District
· City Council
REGULAR MEETINGS
Ist and 3~d Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m.
TO BE HELD AT THE CUCAHONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BOARDROOM
10440 ASHFORD ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
909 987-2591
OCTOBER 15, 2003
AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William d. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro lem
Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member
Robert d. Howdyshell ............... Member
Donald d. Kurth, M.D ................ Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. CCWD
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting .. CCWD Boardroom
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... CCWD Boardroom
Regular City Council Meeting ............ CCWD Boardroom
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
..~ANCHO
~,~UCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the
Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you
agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage
all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or
disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind
the staff table. Please list your name, address and phone number. Comments are limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item noton the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is
opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name
for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on
Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public
Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign-in desk located behind the staff tabre during the
Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Beginning with the Wednesday, July 16, 2003, City Council meeting, the meetings will not be broadcast Live, but are
scheduled to air on RCTV-3 on a tape-delayed basis the night after {Thursday) at 7:00 p.m. Normal, regularly-scheduled
replays of City Council meetings will air on RCTV-3 the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m., and
7:00 p.m. The temporary relocation to the Cucamonga County Water District will last for approximately four months.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday
of the month at 7:00 p.m. (temporarily in the CCWD Boardroom
located at 10440 Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA).
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency
And the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at:
http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
J I;a I' Y°U need special assistance °r acc°mm°dati°ns to Participate in this meeting, pleaseI
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 1
cRANCHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
[[ A. CALL TO ORDER I
1. Roll Call: Alexander__, Gutierrez__,
Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__.
II ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I
1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring October 23 -31, 2003, as
Red Ribbon Week in Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Presentation of Certificates to Red Ribbon Week Design Winner and
Honorable Mention Recipients.
3. Presentation of the Highlights of the Central Park Groundbreaking
Event held October 13, 2003.
I[ C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSI
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
l[i,. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the
City Council on matters not on the agenda.
IIE, CONSENT CALENDARI
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: September 22, 2003 (Special Meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register September 24 through October 6, 1
2003, and Payroll ending October 6, 2003, for the total amount of
$3,364,634.25.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 2
cR,~NCHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 96
September 30, 2003.
4. Approval of an appropriation of $25,000.00 to Acct. No. 1001305-5200 32
for Tract 13812 Vintage Avenue Extension, and authorization to
refund Panda Development.
5. Approval of a $50,000.00 appropriation to Acct. No. 1025001-5200 for 33
various operation and maintenance expenditures, including storage
costs, equipment rental, material handling, landscape/hardscape
materials, and supplies; and approval of a $50,000.00 appropriation to
Acct. No. 1025001-5300 for various contract services expenditures,
including surveying, electrical, civil design and soils/material testing
related to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility.
6. Approval to purchase one (1) message board from the manufacturer, 35
Advanced Safety Products of Fallbrook, California, as a single source
pumhase in the amount of $24,097.21, to be funded from the
Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund, Acct. No. 1712001-5603.
7. Approval to seek bids from the pre-qualified bidders for the Rancho 36
Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Structures and Building
Foundation project, to be funded from Redevelopment Agency funds.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-256 38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION
PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
RECEIVE BIDS
8. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga modifying 48
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Tariff for Temporary
Construction Power.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-257
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY TARIFF
FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION POWER
9. Approval of a Resolution to apply for grant funds for the Per Capita
Grant Program under the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe 54
Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be heed at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 3
cR~.~cHo Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
RESOLUTION NO. 03-258 51~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICANT
TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR PER
CAPITA GRAND PROGRAM UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR,
SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND
COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002
10. Approval of a Resolution to apply for grant funds for the Robedi- 58
Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant Program under the California Clean Air,
Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-259 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICANT
TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN
WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD
PARKS AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND
ACT OF 2002
11. Approval of a Resolution of Intention to vacate remaining portions of 62
two alleys, generally within the Northtown area, located on the south
side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue, and setting the
date of the public hearing for November 5, 2003.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-260 64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
VACATE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ALLEYS
GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN
AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA
AVENUE
12. Approval to summarily vacate a 10-foot wide easement for street tree 72
maintenance purposes, located on the south side of Terra Vista
Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, submitted by KB Home - APN:
1077-831-32 (V-194).
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 4
Cp~M~CHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
RESOLUTION NO. 03-261 75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF A 10-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT
FOR STREET TREES MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF
COYOTE CANYON PARK-APN: 1077-831-32
(V-194)
13. Approval for the award of an annual contract for Street Striping and
Pavement Marking Maintenance for fiscal year 2003/04, with an 78
option to renew, upon mutual consent, for additional one (1) year
periods, up to a total of an additional four (4) years, to Traffic
Operations, /nc. (CO 03-116) of Pomona, in the amount of
$102,555.00, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in
the amount of $10,255.00, funded from Fund 1170-303-5300.
14. Approval of a contract renewal with U.S. Guards, /nc. (CO 01-060) to
June 30, 2004, in the amount of $159,333, and approval of an 82
additional $73,217 for anticipated extra work related to construction
and additional facilities, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001312-5304
($25,750); 1133303-5304 ($117,800); 1700201-5304 ($69,000), and
1290601-5300 $20,000); and approval of an appropriation of $28,497
from Capital Reserve balance to Acct. No. 1025001-55650-10251382-
0 for temporary security service at the 12kV Electrical Substation
project to be located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and
Stadium Parkway.
15. Approval of a contract renewal with Coasta/Bui/ding Services (CO 00-
102) to June 30, 2004, in the amount of $180,500, and approval of an 83
additional $62,500 for anticipated extra work related to construction,
remodeling and additional facilities, to be funded from Acct. No.
1001312-5304 ($240,000), and 1700201-5304 ($3,000).
16. Approval of a contract renewal with JDC, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga
(CO 01-075), to June 30, 2004, for the "City Wide Concrete Repair, 84
Tree Removal and Tree Planning Annual Maintenance Agreement" for
repair of City sidewalks, curb and gutters in the amount of $350,000,
to be funded from Acct. No. 1176303-5300.
17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $1,275,114.00 to the 84-1
apparent Iow bidder, Double D Pippline, Inc. (CO 03-117), and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$127,511.40 for the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community
Facilities District 2003-01, to be funded from CFD 2003-01 funds,
Acct. No. 16143035650.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 5
cR, M~CHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
18. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance 85
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 99-40,
located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Archibald
Avenue, submitted by Airport Corporate Center, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-262 86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-40 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
19. Approval to release a $195,300.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond for
Tract Map 12659-4, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and 88
Wilson Avenues, submitted by Centex Homes.
20. Approval to release a Maintenance Bond for Tract 14380, located at
the northwest corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues, submitted by 90
Mastercraft.
21. Approval to release a Maintenance Bond for Tract 15911, located on 92
the east side of East Avenue south of Victoria Street, submitted by
Ryiand Homes.
22. Approval to release a $32,000.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond for 94
Tract No. 15963, located west of London Avenue and north of
Lemon Avenue, submitted by Crestwood Corporation.
F. CONSENT ORDINANCES I
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440
cR C.O Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
II G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO 96
CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAl
IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-
00002 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - A request to amend the
General Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate
portions of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a
Secondary Street to a Collector Street and Modified Collector Street -
APN: 0229-021-62, 63 and 64. Related Files: Development Code
Amendment DRC2003-00616, Tentative Pamel Map SUBTPM16033,
Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00858. An Environmental Impact Report was
previously certified in October 2001. The addendum is being prepared
in accordance with the Carifornia Environmental Quality Act.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAl 96
IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code to redesignate the
Industrial Districts Subarea 8 portion of Day Creek Boulevard south of
Foothill Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue from a Secondary Street
to a Modified Local Collector Street - APN: 0229-021-20, 34, 47, 53,
54, and 55. Related Files: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-
00002, Tentative Parcel Map SBUTPM16033, Conditionar Use Permit
DRC2002-00839, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. An
Environmental Impact Report was previously certified in October 2001.
The addendum is being prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAl 96
IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM1603R -
FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - A request to subdivide 60 acres of land
into 12 parcels and public right-of-way dedication as part of a proposed
shopping center on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related
Office/Commercial district of the Victoria Community Plan - APN:
0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related files: General Plan Amendment
GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment DCA2003-00616,
Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00858. An Environmental Impact Report was
previously certified in October 2001. The addendum is being prepared
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Oucamonga County Water District at 10440 7
C~ICHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
UCMdONGA
CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO 96
CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-
00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - A review of the site plan and
architectural elevations for a proposed shopping center of up to
315,000 square feet, including in-line retail stores and individual retail
pad buildings on 60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest
corners of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the
Regional Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community
Plan. APN: 0229-021-62, 63 and 64. Related Files: General Plan
Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, Tentative Pamel Map SUBTPM16033, and
Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. An Environmental Impact
Report was previously certified in October 2001. The addendum is
being prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO 96
CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-
00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING1 LLC - The review of a Development
Agreement for a proposed shopping center of up to 315,000 square
feet that includes in-line retail stores and individual retail pad buildings
on 60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related
Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan - APN:
0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related Files: General Plan Amendment
GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment DCA2003-00616,
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, and Conditional Use Permit
DRC2002-00839. An Environmental Impact Report was previously
certified in October 2001. The addendum is being prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-263 178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002, TO CHANGE
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM A
SECONDARY ARTERIAL TO A COLLECTOR
AND A MODIFIED COLLECTOR BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER
AVENUE ON THE GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, EXHIBIT 111-4, TABLE Ill-
11, AND THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF
GENERAL PLAN ROADWAYS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0229-021-62, 63 AND 64
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 8
Ashford St,, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ORDINANCE NO. 717 (first reading) 182
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616, AMENDING
SECTION 17.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHANGING THE
CLASSIFICATION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,
EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE IN THE
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, TO A MODIFIED
LOCAL COLLECTOR AS DEPICTED IN FIGURES
17.30.080-J AND 17.30.040-B AND TEXT
CHANGES TO SECTION 17.30.080.1.4 AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0229-021-20, 34, 47, 53, 54 AND 55
RESOLUTION NO. 03-264 186
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16033, A SUBDIVISION OF 15 PARCELS
AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON
60 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE REGIONAL
RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF
THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-
021-62, 63 AND 64
RESOLUTION NO. 03-265 221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2002-00839, AUTHORIZING THE
DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVING THE SITE,
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING, AND
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS OF A
SHOPPING CENTER OF UP TO 315,000
SQUARE FEET, INCLUDING IN-LINE RETAIL
STORES AND RETAIL PAD BUILDINGS, WHICH
INCLUDE RESTAURANT SITES WITH A DRIVE-
THRU LANE, ON APPROXIMATELY 45.5 ACRES
OF LAND AT THE SOUTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED
OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-
021-62, 63 AND 64
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 9
cRANcHO Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ORDINANCE NO. 718 (first reading) 262
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858 WITH
FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC, TO ESTABLISH A
PROCESS FOR FINANCING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD WITHIN THE FOOTHILL
CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
CORNERS OF DAY CREEK AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARDS AS PROVIDED FOR IN
SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE FOR REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0210-082-53 THRU 57
CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-
00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the 304
Regional Center Land Use Mix Table 111-4 by modifying the land use
acreage ranges and the density ranges to be consistent with the
approved Master Plan that is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard,
Base Line Road, the 1-15 Freeway, and Day Creek Channel. In
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section
15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent or supplemental
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is
required to be prepared.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-266 376
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712, A REQUEST
TO AMEND THE REGIONAL CENTER LAND
USE MIX TABLE 111-4 BY MODIFYING THE
LAND USE ACREAGE RANGES AND THE
DENSITY RANGES TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS WITHIN THE REGIONAL CENTER
THAT IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASE LINE ROAD, 1-
15 FREEWAY, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
,(~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamoaga County Water District at 10440 10
cRANc[~o Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
II-. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
III. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF
REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
[I J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ANIMAl 379
SHELTER AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEF
RESOLUTION NO. 03-267 386
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AS A GOAL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO
WORK WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO TO FIND HOMES FOR ALL
ADOPTABLE ANIMALS AT THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER SO THAT
NO ADOPTABLE ANIMAL IS EUTHANIZED
2. PARKS1 RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICER
UPDATE 388
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 15, 2003 - 7:00 P.M.
The meeting will be held at the Cucamonga County Water District at 10440 1 1
cR~-'~cno Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT
MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
II~. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
1. UPDATE FROM SENIOR ADVISORY FUNDRAISING
SUBCOMMITTEE REGARDING THE CENTRAL PARK SENIOR
CENTER (Oral)
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on October 9, 2003, seventy two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
September 22, 2003
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special MeetinR
I
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City
Council was held on Monday, September 22, 2003, at the Civic Center Tri Communities Room, located at
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/President/Mayor William J.
Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.
Present were Agency/Board/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Rowdyshell, Donald J. Kurth,
M.D., Diane Williams and Chairman/President/Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack.Lam, Executive Director/City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager;
Linde D. Daniels, RDA Director; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services
Director; Tamara Laynel Finance Officer; Mike TenEyck, Management Analyst III; Barrye Hanson, Sr.
Civil Engineer; Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh, Building
Official; John Thomas, Plan Check Manager; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula
Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Lieutenant Valerie
Tanguay and Sergeant Robert Wickum, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Dennis
Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager;
Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
B, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC [
No communication was made from the public.
C. ITEM OFBUSINESS
1. CONSIDERATION OF BUDGET STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH THE IMPACT OF STATI-
BUDGET DECISIONS FOR FY 2003-04
Staff report and power presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were given by Jack Lam, Executive
Director/City Manager.
Agency/Board/Councilmember Williams ~tated she is most interested in the idea of closing the library on
Friday. She felt the community really needs our Library because of what it has to offer that other libraries
don't. She hoped this plan could be put on hold. She added the Friends of the Library will generate
$100,000 in revenue this year. She stated the Community Foundation and the Library Foundation have
joined together to create an endowment worth $2,000,000 called PAL. She stated she would be willing to
talk to the Friends and see if they would be willing to give the City the $50,000 it would cost to leave the
library open on Friday. She felt they would take pride in doing this.
Agency/Board/Councilmember Gutierrez stated he wished the hotels on Fourth Street were built already
so that revenue Would be generated from the hotel tax. He wished there were new ways to generate
revenue.
Redevelopment Agency/Fire Protection District/City Council Minutes
September 22, 2003
Page 2
Agency/Board/Councilmember Howdyshell felt this was a gloomy picture. He stated he would hate to see
the Library close on Friday.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander felt it should be looked at to see if there is another place to cut
because he did not want to see the Library's hours cut. He asked that this matter be continued for further
investigation.
Agency/Board/Councilmember Kurth asked if staffing could be cut at the Library so that it would, not have
to close a day.
Jack Lam, Executive Director/City Manager, stated staffing is already very thin.
Deborah Clark, Library Director, felt if staffing is reduced certain services might not be able to continue.
She suggested they could possibly reduce hours on other days instead of closing completely on Friday.
Jack Lam, Executive Director/City Manager, stated if the Council feels the library closure for Friday will
not work, they could use reserve money for this year and see what the state will do for the next year.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander stated he would be comfortable with that, but would like for the
Council to have another meeting in 30 days to hear of any other options. He suggested the suggestion to
close the Library on Friday not be approved, but to approve the other budget strategies as suggested by
the City Manager.
Agency/Board/Councilmember Williams felt the community would get behind the City to help find the
money.
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Williams to approve the suggestions made by the City
Manager with the exception of the Library closing and to come back in 30 days to discuss other options.
James Frost, City Treasurer, felt the public should be aware of this situation so they can help the City. He
stated public safety programs should be saved.
Agency/Board/Councilmember Kurth felt it was important to keep the Library open so people can continue
their education.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0,
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
T H E C I 'i' Y 0 F
I~AN C H 0 C UCA H 0 N GA
Memomndmn
DATE: Octj;~er 14, 2003
TO: Re~/~rrez,/,/_ Councilmember
FROM: Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Warrants Review for Council Meeting--October 15, 2003
The City Attorney has had an opportunity to review the Summary of Warrants for the
October 15, 2003, Council meeting and has found no conflict of interest.
If you have any questions, please give me a calf at extension 2003.
c: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Jim Markman, City Attorney
Debbie Adams, City Clerk
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Tamara Layne, Finance Officer
Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor
T H E C: I T Y 0 F
Memorandum
DATE: October 08, 2003
TO:. Debbie Adams, City Clerk
CC: Jack Lam, City Manager
Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager
Jim Markman, City Attorney
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor
FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer
SUBJECT': Summary of Warrants Issued to Vendors Representing Possible
Conflict of Interest for Councilmember Gutierrez - Council Meeting Date: Oct 15,
2003
Attached for your reference is a summery of warrants by entity that were issued to
vendors representing a possible conflict of interest for Councilmember Gutierrez due
to his personal business dealings with them. These warrants are included in the
Consent Calendar section of each enfity's agenda. If you have any questions
regarding the attached, please give me a call at extension 2430. Thank you.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF WARRANTS
COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2003
VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT
Arrowhead Credit Union 202.101 9/24/2003 $4,955.06
Arrowhead Credit Union 202328 9/30/2003 $136.77
Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commeme 202528 10/1/2003 $60.00
Southern Cai Edison 202278 9/24/2003 $12,455.15
Southern Cai Edison 202279 9/24/2003 $176,647.05
Southern Cai Edison 202560 10/1/2003 $16,178.40
Southern Cai Edison 202561 10/1/2003 $18,257.50
i:~finance~accounts payable~council warrant list. xls 1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SUMMARY OF WARRANTS
COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2003
VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT
Arrowhead Credit Union 202101 9/24/2003 $605.18
RDA
hlfinancelaccounts payablelcouncil warrant list.xls -1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF WARRANTS
COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: OCT 15, 2003 August warrants
VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT
Arrowhead Credit Union 201158 8/27/2003 $874.29
Southern Cai Edison 200451 8/6/2003 $1,495.19
Southern Cai Edison 200865 8/13/2003 $4,462.00
Southern Cai Edison 201080 8/20/2003 $15.15
Southern Cai Edison 201399 8/27/2003 $6,554.56
i:lfinancetaccounts payabletcouncil warrant lisLxls FIRE-1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF WARRANTS
COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2003 September warrants
VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT
Arrowhead Credit Union 202101 9/24/2003 $2,080.54
h~financelaccounts payablelcouncil warrant list. xls FI RE-1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202084 9/24/2003 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 70.00
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 17.36
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.72
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 248.17
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.72
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 52.08
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 837.84
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 567.64
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 140.08
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 767.81
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 207.42
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 858.25
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,066.65
AP ~ 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 119.39
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 555.31
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003. A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.72
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 43.96
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 362.52
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 29.02
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 17.36
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 942.56
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 49.42
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 59.57
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R T1RE SERVICE 34.72
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 32.06
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 47.32
AP - 00202085 9/24/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.72
AP - 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 129.40
AP - 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 94.00
AP - 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 175.11
AP - 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 74.00
AP 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 64.00
AP 00202086 9/24/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 278.08
AP 00202087 9/24/2003 ABLAC 285.87
AP 00202088 9/24/2003 ABLETRONICS 50.43
AP 00202089 9/24/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,386.00
AP 00202090 9/24/2003 ADT SECIJRITY SERVICES INC 313.87
AP 00202090 9/24/2003 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 313.87
AP 00202094 9/24/2003 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 170.55
AP 00202096 9/24/2003 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 410.64
AP - 00202096 9/24/2003 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 965.05
AP - 00202097 9/24/2003 AMERICAN RED CROSS 115.00
AP - 00202098 9/24/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00
AP - 00202098 9/24/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31
AP - 00202098 9/24/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00
AP - 00202098 9/24/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 179.00
AP- 00202099 9/24/2003 ARBOR NURSERY INC 808.13
AP - 00202100 9/24/2003 ARROW & ROCHESTER TIC 584.00
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 164.28
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: / 13:26:4
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 47.80
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 192.74
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 198.08
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 831.28
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 67.73
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 245.00
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 59.50
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 27.13
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 240.85
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 121.60
AP - 00202101 9/24/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 27.50
AP - 00202102 9/24/2003 ASSI SECURITY 135.00
AP - 00202102 9/24/2003 ASSI SECURITY 125.00
AP - 00202102 9/24/2003 ASSI SECURITY 125.00
AP - 00202102 9/24/2003 ASSI SECURITY 325.00
AP - 00202103 9/24/2003 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1,919.00
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -484.22
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 37.87
AP - 00202105 9/2412003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 576.16
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 45.48
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 35.35
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -147.09
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 147.09
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 48.49
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 70.71
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 322.47
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 43.76
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 272.03
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 32.45
AP - 00202105 9/24/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 939.50
AP - 00202106 9/24/2003 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 6,150.00
AP - 00202106 9/24/2003 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 2,078.00
AP - 00202106 9/24/2003 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,200.00
AP - 00202107 9/24/2003 BOAL ELECTRIC 3,859.29
AP - 00202108 9/24/2003 BOYLE ENGINEERING 29,408.89
AP - 00202110 9/24/2003 BRODART BOOKS 2,204.57
AP - 00202110 9/24/2003 BRODART BOOKS 2,618.33
AP - 00202110 9/24/2003 BRODART BOOKS 17,636.52
AP - 00202112 9/24/2003 BYRD AND ASSOCIATES INC R M 750.00
AP - 00202113 9/24/2003 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 278.77
AP - 00202114 9/24/2003 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN INC 500.00
AP ~ 00202115 9/24/2003 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' 72,912.40
AP - 00202116 9/24/2003 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 71.37
AP - 00202116 9/24/2003 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 40.27
AP - 00202117 9/24/2003 CALSENSE 587.27
AP- 00202117 9/24/2003 CALSENSE 1,104.46
AP - 00202117 9/24/2003 CALSENSE 1,002.11
AP - 00202118 9/24/2003 CASTILLO, JESSIE 335.00
AP - 00202119 9/24/2003 CCPOA 30.00
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 4,000.00
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 1,000.00
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 1,700.00
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 200.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_RECJ_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:~1
22-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 25.00
AP- 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 976.06
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 4,500.00
AP- 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 3,162.39
AP - 00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 80.00
AP-00202120 9/24/2003 CCWD 1,031.64
AP - 00202121 9/24/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 407.03
AP - 00202121 9/24/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 283.76
AP - 00202122 9/24/2003 CHARTER MEDIA 2,932.00
AP - 00202123 9/24/2003 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT: 109.00
AP - 00202124 9/24/2003 CITY RENTALS 321.55
AP - 00202125 9/24/2003 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,120.00
AP - 00202125 9/24/2003 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 6,600.00
AP - 00202126 9/24/2003 COLLETTE, PETE 10.00
AP - 00202127 9/24/2003 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50
AP - 00202128 9/24/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00202128 9/24/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00
AP - 00202129 9/24/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP - 00202129 9/24/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.33
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 78.23
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 291.43
AP- 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,125.13
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,808.23
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,258.93
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 153.73
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 677.43
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,471.63
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 21.03
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,978.83
AP - 00202131 9/2412003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 22.13
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 556.43
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,251.53
AP- 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 817.13
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,110.83
AP- 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,180.23
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,565.13
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 575.13
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,160.33
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 250.63
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 791.83
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,663.03
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 670.83
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 897.43
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 921.63
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 516.83
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.18
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,049.23
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 52.98
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,329.73
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 504.83
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 392.53
AP - 00202131 9/24/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,782.93
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:e/ 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 394.37
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 454.71
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 325.41
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 592.09
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 499.96
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 334.03
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 383.59
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 489.73
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 454.71
AP - 00202132 9/24/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 802.74
AP - 00202133 9/24/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 7,174.00
AP - 00202133 9/24/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 50,000.00
AP - 00202133 9/24/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 21,688.00
AP - 00202133 9/24/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 20,433.00
AP - 00202134 9/24/2003 DAPPER TIRE CO 52.62
AP - 00202134 9/24/2003 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,544.97
AP - 00202135 9/24/2003 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 175,667.40
AP - 00202136 9/24/2003 DAVIS, DICK 20.00
AP - 00202137 9/24/2003 DAWSON, MiCHELLE 100.00
AP - 00202138 9/24/2003 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 113.50
AP - 00202139 9/24/2003 DELTA DENTAL 225.90
AP- 00202140 9/24/2003 DELTAMICROIMAGINGINC 1,165.62
AP - 00202141 9/24/2003 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 1,601.90
AP - 00202142 9/24/2003 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP - 00202142 9/24/2003 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP - 00202143 9/24/2003 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK -96.00
AP - 00202143 9/24/2003 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 217.18
AP - 00202144 9/24/2003 DIRECT ACCESS INTERNATIONAL 998.60
AP - 00202145 9/24/2003 DRAGON CONSTRUCTION INC. 520.00
AP - 00202146 9/24/2003 EASTER, PAMELA 30.20
AP - 00202146 9/24/2003 EASTER, PAMELA 147.33
AP - 00202147 9/24/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPIvIENT DEPT. 7,406.00
AP - 00202149 9/24/2003 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 39.40
AP - 00202150 9/24/2003 ESGIL CORPORATION 46,370.38
AP - 00202151 9/24/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 994.36
AP - 00202152 9/24/2003 EXPERIAN 50.00
AP - 00202154 9/24/2003 FERNANDEZ, INES 152.00
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 787.05
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 506.00
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.00
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 359.44
AP - 00202155 9/24/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00
AP - 00202156 9/24/2003 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 48.49
AP - 00202157 9/24/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 166.15
AP - 00202157 9/24/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 25.84
AP - 00202157 9/24/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 49.95
AP - 00202158 9/24/2003 G1RON, SABINO 30.00
AP - 00202159 9/24/2003 GIROUX AND ASSOCIATES, EDWARD A 425.00
AP - 00202160 9/24/2003 GRAINGER, WW 150.49
AP - 00202161 9/24/2003 HAINES AND COMPANY INC 278.64
AP- 00202162 9/24/2003 HAKIMI, SUSAN 113.70
AP - 00202163 9/24/2003 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50
User: ahunsber ~ Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:Il 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202165 9/24/2003 HOCKWALD, CLARK 70.00
AP- 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLL1DAY ROCK CO INC 191.26
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 135.00
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 ItOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 204.19
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 237.86
AP - 00202166 9/24/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 236.08
AP - 00202167 9/24/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 54.54
AP - 00202168 9/24/2003 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00202169 9/24/2003 HURST, JULIE 24.00
AP - 00202170 9/24/2003 IAAM 300.00
AP- 00202171 9/24/2003 IBM CORPORATION 216.38
AP - 00202172 9/24/2003 ICI DLILUX PAINT CENTERS 151.79
AP - 00202173 9/24/2003 iNLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 245.70
AP - 00202173 9/24~2003 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 301.35
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 529.20
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 518.70
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 588.00
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 298.20
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 301.35
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 283.50
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 286.65
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 806.40
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 iNLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 264.60
AP - 00202174 9/24/2003 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 667.80
AP - 00202175 9/24/2003 INTOXIMETERS INC 111.52
AP - 00202176 9/24/2003 JANECEK, LINDA 21.51
AP - 00202177 9/24/2003 JOHNSON, STACI 50.00
AP - 00202178 9/24/2003 JONES, NORMA 100.00
AP - 00202179 9/24/2003 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 53,410.16
AP - 00202179 9/24/2003 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 825.44
AP - 00202180 9/24/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 618.57
AP - 00202181 9/24/2003 KIM, CINDY 38.00
AP - 00202184 9/24/2003 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 213.43
AP - 00202185 9/24/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 6,808.50
AP - 00202186 9/24/2003 KURTH, DONALD 43.58
AP - 00202187 9/24/2003 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 170.16
AP - 00202188 9/24/2003 LAWN TECH EQUIPMENT COMPANY 10,060.04
AP - 00202190 9/24/2003 LEFF, ROY A 70.00
AP - 00202191 9/24/2003 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 144.00
AP - 00202193 9/24/2003 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO [NC 366.24
AP - 00202194 9/24/2003 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
AP - 00202196 9/24/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46
AP - 00202196 9/24/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06
AP - 00202196 9/24/2003 MARIFOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,718.70
AP - 00202196 9/24/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,631.13
AP - 00202197 9/24/2003 MARSHALL FIELDS 40.92
AP ~ 00202198 9/24/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00202198 9/24/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00202198 9/24/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00202199 9/24/2003 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 102.91
AP - 00202200 9/24/2003 MEYER, BILL 40.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 10/07/2,3¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: t~ 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al~enda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202201 9/24/2003 MEYER, RICHARD 105.00
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 121.93
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 20.99
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 151.93
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE -59.98
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE -179.94
AP - 00202202 9/24/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 120.94
AP - 00202203 9/24/2003 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 65.00
AP - 00202204 9/24/2003 MILLER, JODI 50.00
AP - 00202206 9/24/2003 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 145.34
AP - 00202207 9/24/2003 MOBILE TRAFFIC ZONE INC 565.01
AP - 00202208 9/24/2003 MORITA, DUANE 8,620.00
AP - 00202209 9/24/2003 MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP I 110.00
AP - 00202210 9/24/2003 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 11.08
AP - 00202211 9/24/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45
AP - 00202212 9/24/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 25,324.70
AP - 00202213 9/24/2003 NATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH 163.16
AP - 00202214 9/24/2003 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16,920.00
AP - 00202215 9/24/2003 NEW GENERATION LANDSCAPE COMPANY IN( 59,078.51
AP - 00202215 9/24/2003 NEW GENERATION LANDSCAPE COMPANY IN( -9,669.34
AP - 00202216 9/24/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 92.56
AP - 00202217 9/24/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 80.00
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 4,385.80
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 468.90
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 31.25
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 13.47
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 51.00
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 69.66
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 162.16
AP - 00202218 9/24/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 343.61
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 180.13
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 142.93
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 101.46
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 1,055.68
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 1.59
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -8.34
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 940.87
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 327.59
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -23.26
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 390.28
AP - 00202219 9/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 282.05
AP - 00202220 9/24/2003 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35
AP - 00202221 9/24/2003 P A P A 55.00
AP - 00202222 9/24/2003 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 646.50
AP - 00202223 9/24/2003 PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC 65,502.42
AP - 00202224 9/24/2003 PEP BOYS 30.08
AP - 00202225 9/24/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 85.94
AP - 00202225 9/24/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 566.77
AP - 00202225 9/24/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,888.46
AP - 00202225 9/24/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 385.99
AP - 00202225 9/24/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 15.00
AP - 00202227 9/24/2003 PINEIRO, MELISSA 12.00
AP - 00202228 9/24/2003 PIONEER PACIFIC INC 996.09
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 10/07/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:/f 13:26:'~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202229 9/24/2003 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 289.31
AP - 00202229 9/24/2003 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 248.08 ·
AP - 00202230 9/24/2003 PORTABLE STORAGE CORP 150.00
AP - 00202231 9/24/2003 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 177.06
AP - 00202232 9/24/2003 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,857.25
AP - 00202233 9/24/2003 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 203.74
AP - 00202233 9/24/2003 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 187.40
AP - 00202234 9/24/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00202234 9/24/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00202234 9/24/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00202235 9/24/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 34.48
AP - 00202235 9/24/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 25.86
AP - 00202236 9/24/2003 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 775.78
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 114.09
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 70.19
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 665.03
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 106.53
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 452.14
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE . 380.20
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 319.21
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 190.28
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 281.56
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 327.38
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 556.95
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.81
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 175.32
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 125.90
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 193.12
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 368.90
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 33.11
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 342.70
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.81
AP - 00202237 9/24/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00202238 9/24/2003 R H F INC 121.44
AP - 00202238 9/24/2003 R H F INC 64.36
AP - 00202240 9/24/2003 RACEWAY FORD 45,286.55
AP - 00202241 9/24/2003 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 23.83
AP - 00202241 9/24/2003 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 202.83
AP - 00202241 9/24/2003 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 14.92
AP - 00202242 9/24/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 137.37
AP - 00202243 9/24/2003 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50
AP - 00202244 9/24/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 122.90
AP - 00202244 9/24/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 63.81
AP - 00202244 9/24/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 205.27
AP - 00202245 9/24/2003 RH TECHNOLOGY 676.50
AP - 00202245 9/24/2003 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00
AP - 00202246 9/24/2003 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,786.48
AP - 00202246 9/24/2003 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 4,280.70
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~ 13:26:4
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202246 9/24/2003 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,092.76
AP - 00202246 9/24/2003 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 17,997.13
AP - 00202247 9/24/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 694.11
AP - 00202248 9/24/2003 . RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP - 00202249 9/24/2003 RMA GROUP 255.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR., RAUL P 60.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR., RAUL P 60.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 64.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 63.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 90.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 62.50
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 62.50
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 96.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 120.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 85.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 67.00
AP - 00202250 9/24/2003 ROBLES SR. RAUL P 60.00
AP - 00202251 9/24/2003 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 132.56
AP - 00202252 9/24/2003 RUIZ, PEDRO 376.00
AP - 00202253 9/24/2003 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 255.88
AP - 00202254 9/24/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CI-IILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 233.50
AP - 00202255 9/24/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68
AP - 00202257 9/24/2003 SAN BERNARD[NO CO DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK; 27,677.52
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 635.73
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 187.49
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 658.35
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 379.28
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 187.49
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 187.49
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99
AP - 00202262 9/24/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 506.43
AP - 00202263 9/24/2003 SCEPIOA 300.00
AP - 00202264 9/24/2003 SHEAKLEY UNISERVICE INC 1,000.00
AP - 00202265 9/24/2003 SHERI[~S COURT SERVICES 115.00
AP - 00202266 9/24/2003 SHOETERIA IND INC 113.13
AP - 00202267 9/24/2003 SIGN SHOP, THE 592.63
AP - 00202268 9/24/2003 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00
AP - 00202269 9/24/2003 SIR SPEEDY 5.39
AP - 00202270 9/24/2003 SMART AND FINAL 221.52
AP - 00202270 9/24/2003 SMART AND FINAL 33.94
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 32.00
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 29.98
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 12.93
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 22.60
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 21.41
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 2.99
AP - 00202271 9/24/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 22.47
AP - 00202272 9/24/2003 SMITH MANUFACTURING COMPANY 174.00
AP - 00202273 9/24/2003 SMITH SYSTEM INC 229.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~,,,-a 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202274 9/24/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 762.36
AP - 00202274 9/24/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 68.20
AP - 00202274 9/24/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 26.88
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,734.59
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.42
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.02
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.86
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.34
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.01
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.38
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.10
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.96
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.63
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.29
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86
AP - 00202278 9/2412003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.37
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.08
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.77
AP - 00202278 9~24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.00
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.17
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.79
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.74
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.39
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.03
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.81
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.32
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.76
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.04
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.53
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.11
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.03
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.51
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 194.28
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.82
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.76
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.17
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.27
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~,,n 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.17
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.92
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.51
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.33
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.63
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.94
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.95
AP - 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.41
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.22
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.38
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.25
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.3 l
AP 00202278 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.18
AP 00202279 9~24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 176,647.05
AP 00202280 9/24/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 135.00
AP 00202281 9/24/2003 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 150.00
AP 00202281 9/24/2003 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 125.00
AP 00202282 9/24/2003 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 73.49
AP 00202283 9/24/2003 STEVES TOWING 160.00
AP 00202284 9/24/2003 STOFA, JOSEPH 19.00
AP 00202285 9/24/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 3,150.00
AP 00202285 9/24/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 1,750.00
AP 00202286 9/24/2003 SUNRISE FORD 32,184.93
AP 00202286 9/24/2003 SUNRISE FORD 262.65
AP - 00202286 9/24/2003 SUNRISE FORD 55.03
AP - 00202289 9/24/2003 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 414.34
AP - 00202289 9/24/2003 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 124.16
AP - 00202289 9/24/2003 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 205.14
AP - 00202289 9/24/2003 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS -305.04
AP - 00202291 9/24/2003 TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS 630.00
AP - 00202292 9/24/2003 TOBIN, RENEE 45.48
AP - 00202293 9/24/2003 TOMARK SPORTS INC 858.11
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 10,865.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 34.11
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,077.96
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 152.44
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE 1,568.33
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 8,010.00
AP - 00202294 9/2412003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,852.50
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 11,566.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 7,840.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE 3,610.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 17,648.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,310.00
AP - 00202294 9124/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,302.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LA!qDCARE 1,830.00
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,387.66
AP - 00202294 9/24/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 581.08
User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 10/07/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202295 9/24/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,714.00
AP - 00202295 9/24/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 200.00
AP - 00202296 9/24/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.03
AP - 00202296 9/24/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 19.00
AP - 00202297 9/24/2003 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 525.00
AP 00202297 9/24/2003 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 126.20
AP 00202297 9/24/2003 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 6,762.00
AP 00202298 9/24/2003 UNITED STATES TREASURY 150.00
AP 00202299 9/24/2003 UNITEDWAY 616.32
AP 00202300 9/24/2003 UPLAND, CITY OF 200.66
AP 00202301 9/24/2003 UPSCO 400.00
AP 00202302 9/24/2003 UPS 21.82
AP 00202302 9/24/2003 UPS 30.86
AP 00202302 9/24/2003 UPS 68.50
AP 00202302 9/24/2003 UPS 19.20
AP 00202304 9/24/2003 VALLEY SLURRY SEAL CO 143,869.68
AP 00202305 9/24/2003 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 27.45
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 86.57
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 44.76
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 56.82
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 28.28
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 91.95
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 90.48
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.92
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 29.97
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 216.98
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 29.27
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 29.50
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 36.40
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 90.48
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 90.48
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 29.09
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 88.47
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 115.82
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 28.99
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 39.64
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 39.64
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.91
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 155.17
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 28.5 I
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 90.48
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 21.84
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 29.06
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 57.90
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 28.28
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 90.48
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 310.92
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 10/07/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amonnt
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VER1ZON 468.10
AP - 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 28.5 I
AP- 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 106.18
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 49.42
AP 00202307 9/24/2003 VERIZON 41.18
AP 00202308 9/24/2003 VIANNI, SIDNEY 105.00
AP 00202309 9/24/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00
AP 00202310 9/24/2003 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP 00202311 9/24/2003 WALKER, JANET 15.62
AP 00202313 9/24/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 32.87
AP 00202314 9/24/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT 70.58
AP 00202314 9/24/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT 94.22
AP 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 127.13
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 473.85
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 609.16
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 196.00
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 482.72
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAX1E 84.00
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE -129.30
AP-00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE -318.51
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 337.38
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 97.30
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 459.40
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAXIE 502.12
AP - 00202315 9/24/2003 WAX1E 340.60
AP - 00202316 9/24/2003 WEST END YMCA/WEST END KIDS CLUB 75.00
AP - 00202316 9/24/2003 WEST END YMCA/WEST END KIDS CLUB 25.00
AP - 00202317 9/24/2003 WEST GROUP 107.75
AP - 00202319 9/24/2003 WHITE, LARRY 40.00
AP - 00202320 9/24/2003 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 43,432.50
AP - 00202320 9/24/2003 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 17,397.50
AP - 00202322 9/24/2003 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN AND SMART 3,369.17
AP - 00202323 9/24/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00202323 9/24/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00202323 9/24/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35
AP - 00202323 9/24/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04
AP - 00202323 9/24/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 10,594.45
AP - 00202324 9/24/2003 YEE, LARRY 37.00
AP - 00202325 9/24/2003 DENTAL HEALTH SERViCES 225.90
AP - 00202326 9/25/2003 NEW GENERATION LANDSCAPE COMPANY IN( -9,669.34
AP 00202326 9/25/2003 NEW GENERATION LANDSCAPE COMPANY IN( 58,078.51
AP 00202327 9/29/2003 HERTZ LOCAL EDITION RENT A CAR 1,680.25
AP 00202327 9/29/2003 HERTZ LOCAL EDITION RENT A CAR 404.06
AP 00202328 9/30/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 136.77
AP 00202330 10/1/2003 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 44.44
AP 00202331 10/1/2003 AA EQUIPMENT 228.21
AP 00202331 10/1/2003 AA EQUIPMENT 44.55
AP 00202331 10/1/2003 AA EQUIPMENT 16.83
AP 00202332 10/1/2003 AAA APPLIANCE REPAIR 1,300.00
AP- 00202333 10/1/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 353.21
AP-00202333 10/1/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 79.62
AP- 00202333 10/1/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 32.32
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 10/07/213C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00202334 10/1/2003 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00202335 10/1/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,320.00
AP - 00202336 10/1/2003 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 4,499.38
AP - 00202337 10/1/2003 ALPERT PRINTING 4,922.42
AP - 00202338 10/1/2003 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 651.63
AP - 00202338 10/1/2003 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 472.18
AP - 00202338 10/1/2003 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 484.21
AP - 00202338 10/1/2003 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 200.50
AP - 00202339 10/1/2003 AMERICAN PIPE AND SUPPLY 255.62
AP ~ 00202339 10/1/2003 AMERICAN PIPE AND SUPPLY 464.53
AP - 00202340 10/1/2003 ANNUNZIATO, DIANA 50.00
AP - 00202341 10/1/2003 APG COMPANY 6,720.00
AP - 00202342 10/1/2003 ARBOR NURSERY INC 975.14
AP - 00202343 10/1/2003 ARREDONDO, DELORES 15.00
AP - 00202344 10/1/2003 ASHMAN, LE1LA 30.00
AP - 00202345 10/1/2003 AUTO SPECIALISTS 175.00
AP - 00202345 10/1/2003 AUTO SPECIALISTS 1,226.34
AP - 00202346 10/1/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 394.69
AP - 00202346 10/1/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 76.83
AP- 00202347 10/1/2003 BACKUS, ROBERT 155.00
AP - 00202348 10/1/2003 BALS, JASMINE BICHNOG 70.00
AP - 00202349 10/1/2003 BASELINE HARDWARE 74.93
AP - 00202349 10/1/2003 BASELINE HARDWARE 11.88
AP - 00202350 10/1/2003 BERGE, BRANDI 59.00
AP - 00202352 10/1/2003 BOCTOR, ALFRED 70.00
AP - 00202353 10/1/2003 BONILLA, ROSARIO 30.00
AP - 00202354 101112003 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL 14,753.41
AP - 00202355 10/1/2003 BRODART BOOKS 2,742.77
AP - 00202357 10/1/2003 CABANC,-CALVAN, CORAZON 115.00
AP - 00202360 10/1/2003 CALSENSE 559.49
AP - 00202361 10/1/2003 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 17.92
AP - 00202362 10/1/2003 CAMERON, CAIA 30.00
AP - 00202363 10/1/2003 CARDENAS, ELIZABETH 60.00
AP - 00202364 10/1/2003 CARR, PAM 68.00
AP - 00202365 10/1/2003 CEJA, CYNTHIA 71.44
AP - 00202366 10/1/2003 CHA~I~E¥ COLLEGE 2,040.30
AP - 00202367 10/1/2003 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 32.32
AP - 00202368 10/1/2003 CHINN, JACQUELINE 53.00
AP- 00202369 10/1/2003 CHO, CINDY 101.50
AP- 00202370 10/1/2003 CITY RENTALS 13.98
AP - 00202370 10/1/2003 CITY RENTALS 509.71
AP- 00202371 10/1/2003 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP ~ 00202372 10/1/2003 CLARK, CAITLIN 90.98
AP - 00202373 10/1/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 56.46
AP- 00202373 10/1/2003 COLTONTRUCK SUPPLY 83.34
AP - 00202374 10/1/2003 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 188.90
AP - 00202374 10/1/2003 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 84.55
AP - 00202375 10/i/2003 CONCEPCION, ELEANORE 52.00
AP - 00202376 10/1/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00202376 10/1/2003 COPP CRUSHING COP. P, DAN 10.00
AP - 00202376 10/1/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00202376 10/1/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP- 00202376 10/1/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 10/07/20£
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.',~ 13:26:4
/.9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202377 10/1/2003 COUNTY OF MARIN/CAL-SLA 3,600.00
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 91.48
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 113.43
AP- 00202379 10/I/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 114.33
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 131.93
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,008.63
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 448.63
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 206.63
AP- 00202379 I0/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,138.33
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.96
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.97
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 602.53
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.13
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 438.73
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 124.13
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CIJCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.53
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 758.83
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,415.53
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 759.93
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 113.23
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 930.43
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,312.43
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.58
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 13.68
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 731.43
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,155.93
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 96.63
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 6,309.03
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.13
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 146.03
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,681.93
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 180.23
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 260.53
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 370.53
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 193.43
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 344.13
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 128.53
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 422.33
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 503.63
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 297.93
AP 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 184.63
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 262.83
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 466.23
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,624.53
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 460.81
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 460.82
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 780.93
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 778.63
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 213.23
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 550.93
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,826.93
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,003.43
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 150.67
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~, 113:26:4
/¥
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,077.83
AP ~ 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 666.43
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 200.38
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 675.23
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 282.53
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,224.43
AP - 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,810.43
AP- 00202379 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.89
AP - 00202380 10/1/2003 CUCAMONGA VENTURES 1,190.00
AP- 00202381 10/1/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 875.00
AP- 00202381 10/1/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,975.00
AP- 00202381 10/1/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP- 00202381 10/1/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 441.78
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 325.41
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 486.23
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 451.48
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 995.08
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D ANDK CONCRETE COMPANY 684.22
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 802.73
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 161.63
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 417.54
AP - 00202382 10/1/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 475.72
AP - 00202383 10/1/2003 DALPAY, REBECCA 50.00
AP - 00202384 10/1/2003 DATA QUICK 93.50
AP - 00202385 10/1/2003 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP - 00202386 10/1/2003 DEAN, CHERYL 33.00
AP - 00202387 10/1/2003 DECKER, CONNIE 65.00
AP- 00202388 10/1/2003 DELTA DENTAL 33,173.68
AP - 00202389 10/1/2003 DEMKE, SANDRA 100.00
AP - 00202390 10/1/2003 DIAZ, V BEN 70.00
AP - 00202391 10/1/2003 DODT, HEATHER 90.00
AP - 00202392 10/1/2003 DOUGLAS LEATHER AND SPORTING GOODS 674.50
AP - 00202393 10/1/2003 DUHAIME, LISA 55.00
AP - 00202394 10/1/2003 DUNNETT, MEREDITH 44.20
AP - 00202395 10/1/2003 DYE, CAROL 60.00
AP - 00202396 10/1/2003 EDINGTON, ALVIN 5.00
AP - 00202397 10/1/2003 ELLIS, SUSAN 34.00
AP - 00202398 10/1/2003 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 150.00
AP - 00202399 10/1/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 3,950.00
AP - 00202399 10/1/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 6,750.00
AP - 00202400 10/1/2003 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 872.30
AP - 00202401 10/1/2003 ESKENAZI, MOISES 30.00
AP - 00202402 10/1/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.48
AP - 00202402 10/1/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.92
AP - 00202403 10/1/2003 FERNANDEZ, INES 152.00
AP - 00202404 10/1/2003 FIGUEROA, CAROLYN 11.40
AP - 00202405 10/1/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 587.25
AP - 00202405 10/1/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00
AP - 00202405 10/1/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 821.06
AP - 00202406 10/1/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 249.68
AP- 00202406 10/1/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 215.83
AP - 00202406 10/1/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 64.73
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ ,,~ 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00202406 10/I/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 38.46
AP 00202406 10/1/2003 FISHIER SCIENTIFIC 1,250.07
AP 00202406 10/1/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 143.49
AP 00202407 10/1/2003 FORD PRINTING AND MAILING INC 1,024.27
AP 00202408 10/1/2003 FRANKEL, ANA 48.00
AP 00202409 10/1/2003 FRANKLIN HAYNES MARIONETTES 300.00
AP - 00202410 10/1/2003 FRIENDS OF THE WlGNALL 445.00
AP - 00202411 10/1/2003 GANN, MELISSA 50.00
AP - 00202412 10/1/2003 GARRIDO, CARLOS 40.00
AP- 00202413 10/1/2003 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,654.18
AP - 00202416 10/1/2003 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 83.22
AP 00202417 10/1/2003 GOMEZ, ANGLE 16.00
AP 00202417 10/1/2003 GOMEZ, ANGLE 56.00
AP 00202417 10/1/2003 GOMEZ, ANGIE 61.00
AP 00202418 10/1/2003 GRAINGER, WW 30.46
AP 00202419 10/1/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 19.40
AP 00202419 10/1/2003 'GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 36.59
AP 00202419 10/1/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 10.00
AP - 00202420 10/1/2003 GRIBIB, BETH 48.00
AP - 00202421 10/1/2003 GROH GORDY, MICHELLE 85.00
AP - 00202422 10/1/2003 GUARDIAN 2,675.87
AP - 00202423 10/1/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 137.57
AP - 00202424 10/1/2003 HADDOCK, RAMONA 85.00
AP - 00202426 10/1/2003 HANSON, SHANYN 40.00
AP - 00202427 10/1/2003 HARRELL, JACKIE 48.00
AP - 00202428 10/1/2003 HELMRICH, PAM 126.00
AP - 00202429 10/1/2003 HERNANDEZ, CINDY 48.00
AP - 00202430 10/I/2003 HERNANDEZ, YVONNE 147.50
AP- 00202432 10/1/2003 HOCKEY WEST 1,062.56
AP - 00202433 10/1/2003 HOFFMAN, DEE 63.00
AP - 00202434 10/1/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 306.28
AP - 00202434 10/1/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 350.98
AP - 00202434 10/1/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 96.46
AP - 00202435 10/1/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 219.75
AP - 00202435 10/1/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 27.41
AP - 00202435 10/1/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 87.29
AP - 00202435 10/1/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 76.25
AP - 00202436 10/1/2003 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 2,000.00
AP - 00202437 10/1/2003 HOSE MAN INC 27.67
AP- 00202438 10/1/2003 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 217.22
AP - 00202439 10/1/2003 HUO, WENDY 38.00
AP - 00202439 10/1/2003 HUO, WENDY 76.00
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 65.79
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 24.70
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 245.34
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 67.23
AP- 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 483.78
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 44.45
AP - 00202440 10/I/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 245.34
AP - 00202440 10/1/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 79.52
AP- 00202441 10/1/2003 IBM CORPORATION 1,018.19
AP- 00202441 10/1/2003 IBM CORPORATION 417.38
AP - 00202442 10/1/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 154.89
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 10/07/20~,~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:o~ 13:26:-1
/6,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202442 10/1/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 188.77
AP - 00202444 10/1/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 43.53
AP - 00202446 10/1/2003 INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORY' 558.92
AP - 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 21.72
AP - 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 48.74
AP - 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 254.85
AP - 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 67.53
AP - 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 139.05
AP- 00202450 10/1/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 112.88
AP - 00202451 10/1/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS iNC 10,728.83
AP - 00202451 10/1/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS LNC 1,338.60
AP - 00202451 10/1/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS 1NC 477.00
AP - 00202452 10/1/2003 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 26.73
AP - 00202452 10/1/2003 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 1,168.15
AP - 00202453 10/1/2003 JAECKEL, AMBERA 28.00
AP - 00202454 10/1/2003 JAECKEL, TABEA 11.40
AP - 00202455 10/1/2003 JAMES EVENT PRODUCTIONS INC 9,750.00
AP - 00202456 10/1/2003 JONES, SHARON 170.00
AP - 00202457 10/1/2003 KANE, DENISE 108.00
AP - 00202458 10/1/2003 KASBECK, GUNTER 196.00
AP - 00202459 10/1/2003 KECHOUR, DAVE 34.00
AP - 00202460 10/1/2003 KlM, MI RA 99.15
AP - 00202462 10/1/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 5,287.50
AP - 00202463 10/1/2003 LABELLE, CHRIS 32.00
AP - 00202464 10/1/2003 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATION 854.81
AP - 00202465 10/1/2003 LAMM, CARIN 119.33
AP - 00202466 10/1/2003 LAPONTE, JAIMIE 30.00
AP - 00202467 10/1/2003 LARA, CATHERINE 82.25
AP - 00202469 10/1/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 31.80
AP - 00202470 10/1/2003 LEGASPI, ROBIN 30.00
AP - 00202471 10/1/2003 LEIFFER, LUKAS 252.00
AP - 00202472 10/1/2003 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 9.00
AP - 00202473 10/1/2003 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 1,078.35
AP - 00202474 10/1/2003 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 77.19
AP - 00202474 10/1/2003 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 160.06
AP - 00202475 10/1/2003 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 24.37
AP - 00202476 10/1/2003 MADAHAR, ASHOK 200.00
AP - 00202477 10/1/2003 MANFREDI, LISA 96.68
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARI~OSA I-IORTICHETURAL ENT INC 4,845.19
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,598.59
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,885.11
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 16,488.79
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,664.71
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,787.96
AP - 00202478 10/i/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 119.92
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MABIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,103.97
AP - 00202478 10/1/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,357.56
AP- 00202479 10/1/2003 MARK CHRIS INC 623.79
AP - 00202480 10/1/2003 MARRAFO, JAVIER 100.00
AP- 00202481 10/1/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 398.50
AP - 00202481 10/1/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 263.20
AP- 00202481 10/1/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 126.90
AP - 00202481 10/1/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 620.68
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 10/07/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. ~ 13:26:4
/
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202482 10/1/2003 MCMASTER CARP, SUPPLY COMPANY 107.52
AP - 00202484 10/1/2003 MEYER, MARYANN 52.00
AP - 00202485 10/1/2003 MILLIKAN, CAROLE ANN 48.00
AP - 00202486 10/1/2003 MORRISON, KIM 63.00
AP - 00202487 10/1/2003 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 18.79
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 94.93
AP- 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 130.00
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 102.27
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 94.93
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 26.93
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 38.66
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 211.11
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 22.58
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 26.93
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.20
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 272.96
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.80
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.52
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 68.91
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 120.74
AP - 00202488 10/1/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 90.98
AP - 00202490 10/1/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 13,624.14
AP - 00202491 10/1/2003 NATIONS RENT 99.41
AP-00202491 10/1/2003 NATIONS RENT 19.16
AP - 00202492 10/1/2003 NATIONS RENT 70.04
AP - 00202493 10/1/2003 NEW BLOCK ENTERPRISES INC 432.00
AP ~ 00202494 10/1/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 54.53
AP - 00202494 10/1/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 423.77
AP - 00202496 10/1/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 105.00
AP - 00202497 10/1/2003 NUNEZ, IGNACIO 43.78
AP - 00202498 10/1/2003 OEN, LUCIA 63.00
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.61
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.92
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 51.61
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 277.15
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.10
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.95
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.95
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 83.41
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 13.87
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 66.20
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 92.49
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 40.48
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 151.39
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 133.24
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 35.49
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 247.05
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.77
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 7.63
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 6.14
AP- 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 421.18
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 259.81
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 3.54
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 10/07/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.'~ ~, 13:26
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 58.14
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 54.97
AP- 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 21.35
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 49.58
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 67.85
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 39.67
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 197.75
AP - 00202499 10/1/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 68.96
AP - 00202500 10/1/2003 OH, JENNY 60.00
AP - 00202501 10/1/2003 OLCESE, ANGELA 60.00
AP - 00202502 10/1/2003 OLIVA, LAURA 34.00
AP - 00202503 10/1/2003 OMNITRANS 513.50
AP - 00202504 10/1/2003 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 549.00
AP - 00202504 10/1/2003 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 260.00
AP - 00202505 10/1/2003 OTT, LAURA 261.00
AP - 00202505 10/1/2003 OTT, LAURA 87.00
AP - 00202505 10/1/2003 OTT, LAURA 90.00
AP - 00202506 10/1/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 446.08
AP - 00202506 10/1/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 25.34
AP - 00202507 10/1/2003 PACIGA, MARTHA 26.00
AP - 00202508 10/1/2003 PAGENTRY PRODUCTION 8,424.09
AP - 00202509 10/1/2003 PATEL, BHAILAL C 200.00
AP - 00202511 10/1/2003 PEREZ, HECTOR 70.00
AP - 00202512 10/1/2003 PEKEZ, MARY 5.00
AP - 00202513 10/1/2003 PERVO PAINT CO 226.28
AP - 00202513 10/1/2003 PERVO PAINT CO 649.73
AP ~ 00202514 10/1/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 91.95
AP - 00202515 10/1/2003 PIERCE, ANGEL 102.75
AP - 00202516 10/1/2003 PIMENTEL, IRENE 34.00
AP - 00202518 10/1/2003 PLATT, TONY 48.00
AP - 00202519 10/1/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,464.66
AP - 00202520 10/1/2003 PORCHO, YVETTE 32.00
AP - 00202521 10/1/2003 PORTABLE STORAGE CORP 108.90
AP - 00202522 10/1/2003 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 35.00
AP - 00202523 10/1/2003 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81
AP - 00202524 10/1/2003 PRINCIPAL LIFE 14,752.27
AP 00202525 10/1/2003 . PROCHAZKA, CINDY 20.00
AP 00202527 10/1/2003 QUINN, ROBERT 48.00
AP 00202528 10/1/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMIVIEI 15.00
AP 00202528 10/1/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP 00202528 10/1/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 15.00
AP 00202530 10/1/2003 RAWSON, TAMALA 28.00
AP 00202531 10/1/2003 RCPFA 6,641.69
AP- 00202532 10/I/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 145.46
AP - 00202533 10/1/2003 RESOURCEFUL BAG AND TAG INC 516.00
AP - 00202534 10/1/2003 REYES, MONICA 68.00
AP - 00202535 10/1/2003 RIVI~ISY, TODD 96.00
AP- 00202538 10/1/2003 ROAD WORKS INC 194.00
AP - 00202539 10/1/2003 RODRIGUEZ, VALARIE 34.00
AP- 00202541 10/1/2003 RUIZENGINEERING COMPANY 171,836.50
AP - 00202541 10/1/2003 RUIZ ENGINEERING COMPANY 314,484.64
AP - 00202541 10/1/2003 RUIZ ENGINEERING COMPANY -31,448.46
AP- 00202541 10/1/2003 RUIZENGINEERING COMPANY -17,183.65
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 10/07/2012
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, ~,~ 13:26:4
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202542 10/1/2003 S B AND O INC 9,004.50
AP - 00202543 10/1/2003 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC x; 24,127.20
AP - 00202544 10/1/2003 SANCHEZ, MELISSA 53.25
AP-00202545 10/1/2003 SENCHAL, CAL 206.50
AP - 00202545 10/1/2003 SENCHAL, CAL 63.00
AP - 00202545 10/1/2003 SENCHAL, CAL 77.00
AP - 00202547 10/1/2003 SHELTON, JOYCE 62.00
AP - 00202548 10/1/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 608.00
AP - 00202549 10/1/2003 SILVER, EDNA 420.00
AP- 00202550 10/1/2003 SIMKINS, AMY 96.00
AP - 00202551 10/1/2003 SMART AND FINAL 275.93
AP - 00202552 10/1/2003 SMITH, EARLENE 16.00
AP - 00202553 10/1/2003 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 500.00
AP - 00202554 10/1/2003 SONSATIONAL ACTIVITIES 800.00
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,541.55
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.15
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/I/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 194.97
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.51
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.40
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.03
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.54
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.49
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.56
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.64
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP: 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.11
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.88
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CAL1FORNIA EDISON 25.91
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.71
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.63
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.44
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.74
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 331.71
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.45
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP- 00202560 10/I/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.62
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 10/07/20~2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 209.15
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.10
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.80
AP 00202560 101112003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.05
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.80
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.76
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 220.02
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.22
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.72
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.35
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/I/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.06
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.60
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.63
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.74
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.95
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHER/q CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.38
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.85
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.22
AP 00202560' 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.52
AP 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.66
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 208.13
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.26
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.84
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.40
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.74
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.98
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.24
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 10/07/20G
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~/ 13:26:~1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.94
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.99
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 932.99
AP- 00202560 i0/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.81
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.15
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.88
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP - 00202560 10/i/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I01.67
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.22
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.31
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.40
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 314.37
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.73
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.33
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.65
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.64
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.65
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.27
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.48
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.09
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.14
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.93
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.89
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.91
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.02
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.54
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.57
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.75
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.17
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.99
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.28
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.67
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.68
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.89
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.87
AP- 00202560 10/t/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.16
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 10/07/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:26:,1
22
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 89.94
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 92.69
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 90.30
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 349.71
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.29
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 130.66
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 24.94
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 56.73
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.84
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.08
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.08
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.72
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.72
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.06
AP - 00202560 10/i/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.22
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.61
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.54
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP- 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.13
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.87
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 15.47
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 18.66
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 131.03
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.57
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.88
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.22
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 13.76
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 15.15
AP - 00202560 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 14.24
AP - 00202561 10/1/2003 SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON 18,257.50
AP - 00202562 10/1/2003 SPEEDO ELECTRIC CO 269.33
AP - 00202563 10/1/2003 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 313.65
AP- 00202564 10/1/2003 SPINNEY, LORI 135.44
AP - 00202564 10/1/2003 SPINNEY, LORI 4.24
AP - 00202565 10/1/2003 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 181.15
AP - 00202566 10/1/2003 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 592.63
AP - 00202567 10/1/2003 SUNRISE FORD 15.09
AP- 00202567 10/1/2003 SUNRISE FORD 7.37
AP - 00202567 10/1/2003 SUNRISE FORD 32.48
AP - 00202567 10/1/2003 SUNRISE FORD 15.68
AP-00202567 10/1/2003 SUNRISE FORD 122.90
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ ,n13:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00202568 10/1/2003 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GROUF 2,662.50
AP - 00202570 10/1/2003 THOMAS, DRUANN 63.00
AP- 00202571 10/1/2003 TOMARK SPORTS INC 72.69
AP - 00202572 10/1/2003 TRUESDALE, KELLIE 34.00
AP - 00202573 10/1/2003 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 169.54
AP - 00202573 10/1/2003 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 185.54
AP - 00202573 10/1/2003 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 242.31
AP - 00202573 10/1/2003 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 226.31
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 534.04
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 523.39
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 67.28
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.65
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 5.30
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIIqRST UNIFORM SERVICE 38.53
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 177.80
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 52.48
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 126.78
AP - 00202574 10/1/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.15
AP - 00202575 10/1/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,679.10
AP - 00202575 10/1/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 22,772.38
AP - 00202575 10/1/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 20,192.31
AP - 00202577 10/1/2003 UNITED TRAFFIC 3,557.47
AP - 00202578 10/1/2003 UNITED WAY 55.00
AP - 00202579 10/1/2003 UPS 33.62
AP - 00202580 10/1/2003 URTZ, KEVIN 57.00
AP - 00202581 10/1/2003 US HOME INLAND 8.40
AP - 00202582 10/1/2003 US TRAFFIC CORP 1,912.89
AP - 00202583 10/1/2003 VALDEZ INC, OLIVAS 100,890.00
AP - 00202583 10/1/2003 VALDEZ INC, OLIVAS -10,089.00
AP - 00202583 10/1/2003 VALDEZ INC, OLIVAS -4,005.08
AP - 00202583 10/1/2003 VALDEZ INC, OLIVAS 40,050.80
AP - 00202584 10/1/2003 VALENZUELA, SABRINA 88.00
AP - 00202585 10/I/2003 VEND U COMPANY 116.40
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 22.07
AP - 00202586 10/I/2003 VERIZON 29.50
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 20.89
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 29.50
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 41.97
AP-00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 20.88
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERLZON 21.05
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 28.94
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 0.66
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 59.23
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 57.89
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERLZON 21.21
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 22.27
AP-00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 21.24
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 22.36
AP - 00202586 10/1/2003 VERIZON 57.89
AP ~ 00202587 10/1/2003 VIDEO GUYS 1,525.20
AP - 00202588 10/1/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00
AP - 00202589 10/1/2003 VILLEGAS, ERYKA 43.00
AP - 00202590 10/1/2003 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 6,826.41
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: }3:26:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
9/24/2003 through 10/6/2003
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00202591 10/1/2003 WAGDY, MARVY 60.00
AP - 00202592 10/1/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 295.05
AP - 00202593 10/1/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT 70.58
AP - 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 336.69
AP- 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 332.00
AP- 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 41.68
AP - 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 109.68
AP- 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 103.42
AP - 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 691.85
AP- 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 498.69
AP- 00202594 10/1/2003 WAXIE 430.82
AP- 00202596 10/1/2003 WEST COAST NETTING 1,400.00
AP - 00202600 10/1/2003 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 200.19
AP - 00202601 10/1/2003 WILCOX SALES CO 2,404.98
AP - 00202602 10/1/2003 WILLIAMS, DIANE 40.97
AP - 00202603 10/1/2003 WREN AND ASSOCIATES 1,200.00
AP - 00202604 10/1/2003 WRIGHT, LILLIAN 25.00
AP - 00202605 10/1/2003 WRIGHT, MANNICHA 62.00
AP - 00202606 10/1/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89
AP - 00202607 10/1/2003 YEE, LARRY 30.00
AP - 00202608 10/1/2003 YORK INDUSTRIES 329.44
AP - 00202609 10/1/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 471.41
AP - 00202611 10/2/2003 A & M 500.00
AP - 00202612 10/2/2003 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 266.00
AP - 00202613 10/2/2003 APHRC24 LLC 5,000.00
AP - 00202614 10/2/2003 BLUE FOUNTAIN POOLS 250.00
AP - 00202615 10/2/2003 C.P. CONSTRUCTION CO INC 1,000.00
AP - 00202616 10/2/2003 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN INC 500.00
AP - 00202617 10/2/2003 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00202619 10/2/2003 GO-MAN CONSTRUCTION 500.00
AP - 00202620 10/2/2003 INLAND ASPHALT & COATINGS 1,000.00
AP - 00202621 10/2/2003 JAMES W DILLON 500.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 5,250.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 2,000.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 1,500.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 250.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 2,625.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 2,625.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 1,500.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 750.00
AP - 00202622 10/2/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 422.10
AP - 00202623 10/2/2003 NELSON, LESLIE 500.00
AP - 00202624 10/2/2003 OLLIVIERRE, KEITH AND MARILYN 500.00
AP - 00202625 10/2/2003 PRESTIGE HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00202626 10/2/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 9,138.18
AP - 00202627 10/2/2003 WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES 250.00
AP - 00202628 10/2/2003 YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES LP 500.00
Total for Check ID AP: 2,628,078.98
Total for Entity: 2,628,078.98
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 10/07/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA~REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: [3:26:4
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
September 30, 2003
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Funds 32,098,948.95 32,098,948.95 32,098,948.95 20.64 . I I 1.610 1.632
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,523,612.47 1,515,000.00 0,97 733 698 2.150 2.180
Commercial Paper - Discount 10,000,000.00 9,g90,313.89 9,966,552.77 6.42 46 32 1.051 1 066
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 112,000,000.00 112,561,994.16 111,945,943.75 71.97 1,552 1,293 3.250 3.296
Investments 155,613,948.96 156,174,869.47 155,546,445.47 100.00% 1,127 939 2.760 2.798
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checkir~ 440,102.16 440,102.16 440,102.16 1 1 0.493 0.500
(not included in y~eld calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase 922.22 922.22
Subtotal 441,024.38 441,024.38
Total Cash and Investments
156,054,051.11 156,615,893.85 155,987,469.85 1,127 939 2.760 2.798
Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 357,176.23 1,069,335.26
Average Dally Balance 156,673,736.52 159,272,522.48
Effective Rate of Return 2.7'P'~, 2.66%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted March 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Sen, ices Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Intaractive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments wffh Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
gevem the management of these funds.
Po~olio CIT~
CP
n Date: 10/08/2003 - 14:13 PM (PRF_PM1) Sy~Rept V6.21
Report Var. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
September 30, 2003
Local Agency Investment Funds
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Investments
September 30, 2003
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3128X1BD~3 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5.000.000.00 5.048.094.94 4.993.750.00 3.500 3.479 1,692
3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28~2003 3.000.000.00 3.004.715.88 3,000.000.00 2.500 2.466 1,154 11/28/2006
Po~olio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
September 30, 2003
Po~olk) CITY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
September 1,2003 through September 30, 2003
Beginning ~tated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
C.,e~tlficatcc of Deposlt/Neg. - Bank
Commercial Paper. Discount
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
Portfolio CiTY
te: 10~0~2003 o 14:13 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended August 31,2003
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Pavina Aaent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment Distdct No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.45% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.45% 243.295.68
Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.45% 156,969.32
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 657,576.78
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ 0.04
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.45% 585,429.69
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/t/t999 N/A* 0.45% 1,099,800.60
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% 2.46
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,685,232.79
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2~342,809.57
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidatad upon demand.
i:~flnancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls t0/872003 11:39 AM
T H C I T Y O F
I~AN C H 0 C U CAH 0 N C,A
Staff Report
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT; APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF $25,000.00 TO ACCOUNT
NO. 1001305-5200 FOR TRACT 13812 VINTAGE AVENUE
EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZATION TO REFUND PANDA
DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $25,000.00 to
Account No. 1001305-5200 for Tract 13812 Vintage Avenue extension and
authorization to refund Panda Development.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tract 13812 was conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee for the future extension of Vintage
Avenue. The developer, Watt Inland Empire, Inc., deposited $25,000.00 on
September 14, 1990, for the future work. In 1997, Panda Development pumhased
Tract 13812 and inherited all liability and credit from Watt Inland Empire.
Other development in the area constructed Vintage Avenue. Panda Development is
no longer obligated to construct the Vintage Avenue extension and is due the
deposit collected in 1990. The $25,000.00 was not allocated in this Fiscal Year's
budget. This appropriation is now necessary in order to refund Panda Development.
Respectfully submitted,
Will Ne~l
City Engineer
W JO:DJ:sc
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Relmrt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Approval of a $50,000 appropriation to Account 1025001-5200 for various
operation and maintenance expenditures, including storage costs, equipment
rental, material handling, landscape/Hardscape materials, and supplies; and
approve a $50,000 appropriation to account number 1025001-5300 for
various contract services expenditures, including surveying, electrical, Civil
Design and soils/material testing, related to the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility.
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approve a $50,000
appropriation to Account 1025001-5200 for various operation and maintenance
expenditures, including storage costs, equipment rental, material handling,
landscape/Hardscape materials, and supplies; and approve a $50,000 appropriation to
account number 1025001-5300 for various contract service~ ~xp'enditures, including
surveying, electrical, Civil Design and soils/material testing, "related to the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Utility.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and
operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services.
Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a
Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff 0NDAT) Application with Southern California Edison
Company for the provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. This development area will receive permanent
electric service from the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility via a proposed electrical
substation facility to be built at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium
Parkway. The substation began construction on October 13, 2003 and will be operational
March 1,2004, to meet the Mall's scheduled operational date.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION MUNICIPAL UTILITY
OCTOBER 15, 2003
PAGE 2
The construction coordination actives along with restoration of items following the
constriction will require the expenditure of resources not currently within the construction
contracts. The anticipated expenses are outlined below
5200 - Operation & Maintenance
· Storage Cost $15,000.00
· Equipment Rental $10,000.00
· Material Handling $10,000.00
· Landscape/Hardscape Materials $10,000.00
· Supplies $ 5,000.00
$50,000.00
5300 - Contract Services
· Surveying $20,000.00
· Electrical $ 5,000.00
· Civil Design $10,000.00
· Soils/Material Testing $15,000.00
$50,000.00
It is recommended that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approve an appropriation of
$50,000.00 to Account 1025001-5200 and $50,000.00 to account number 1025001-5300
for various operation and maintenance and contract services related to the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Utility as outlined above.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
{~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Repor
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Gary Varney, Streets & Fleet Maintenance Superintendent
Ernest Ruiz, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECt: AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE ONE (1) MESSAGE BOARD FROM THE
MANUFACTURER, ADVANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS OF FALLBROOK,
CALIFORNIA, AS A SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,097.21,
TO BE FUNDED FROM THE EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT
1712001-5603
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) message board from the manufacturer,
Advanced Safety Projects of Fallbrook, California, as a single source purchase in the amount of $24,097.21, to be funded
from the Equipment and Vehicle Replacement fund, account 1712001-5603.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This is a replacement purchase of message board unit g9516, which is almost six years old and is used for emergency
situations and special events. This unit is experiencing more down time for repairs and finding a service repair company
has become more difficult to find due to the unit's age. Replacement of this unit has been approved in the 03/04 budget.
On November 21, 2001, City Council approved the purchase of two message boards exactly like the one requested and
staff has found the two message boards built by Advanced Safety Products (ASP), have surpassed our expectations with
their unique design for traffic message displays. Staff has been happy with the performance of these message boards for
the past 1 V2 years and recommends purchasing an additional message board.
ASP's message board model 85T solar has proven to be dependable, easy to operate and maintain. In order to
standardize equipment and based on our experience with ASP's message boards, we recommend a single soume purchase
from Advanced Safety Products. They will honor their November 2001 pricing previously offered to the City. The
Purchasing Manager has reviewed this request and has approved it to go before the City Council for consideration.
Based on our experience with Advanced Safety Products message board model 85T solar, staff recommends this single
source approval and requests Council to authorize the procurement of the equipment.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil~n J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:GV:jau
R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N G a
~NGINEEIEING DIVISION
DA'~E: October 15, 2003
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SlJBJECT: APPROVAL TO SEEK BIDS FROM THE PRE-QUALIFIED BIDDERS
FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT, TO BE
FUNDED FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Rancho
Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Structures and Building Foundation Project and
authorize and direct the City Clerk to receive bids.
BACKGROUND
Plans end specifications have been completed for the construction of the Rancho
Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Structures and Building Foundation Project,
located in ~ new Victoria Gardens shopping center at Foothill Boulevard and the 1-
15 freeway. The project will include the construction of two - 3 story, cast in place
long span post tensioned concrete parking structures end the basement structure for
the adjacent Cultural Center. Combined, the two parking structures will
accommodate 1,180 cars in 390,930 square feet. The basement structure is
approximately 7,128 square feet. All subterranean work is to occur simultaneously,
enabling an expedited delivery of the basement structure. Both parking structures will
be constructed concurrently, completing on or before October 2004. The Engineer's
estimate for the improvements is $11,700,000.
This project utilized the Pre-Qualification process in the selection of bidders for the
project construction. Pm-Qualification questionnaires were available both at City Hall
as well as on the City's web site and are due back to the City on Thursday, October
16. Qualified contractors will then be invited to continue the bidding process
Page 2
October 15, 2003
APPROVAL OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION
PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS.
including a mandatory pre-bid meeting on October 27th and the bid opening on
November 18, 2003.
~ C"-~'~"~',~,~(~Respectfully submitted, ~
~Villiam J. 0 Neil
City Engineer Community Services Director
NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES AND
BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
RECEIVE B1DS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications
for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for "RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of pre-qualification statements and sealed bids
for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall
be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the dates and times specified below, pre-qualification statements and
sealed bids for the "RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT" in said City.
MANDATORY PRE-QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS: All prime contractors bidding on this
project must be pre-qualified prior to submitting a bid on the project. It is mandatory that all
Contractors who intend to submit a bid fully complete the pre-qualification questionnaire, provide all
materials requested therein, and be approved by the City to be on the final qualified Bidders list. No
bid will be accepted from a Contractor that has failed to comply with these requirements. If two or
more business entities submit a bid as part of a Joint Venture, or expect to submit a bid as part of a
Joint Venture, each entity within the Joint Venture must be separately qualified to bid. The City
reserves the right to adjust, increase, limit, suspend or rescind the pre-qualification rating based on
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 2 of 8
subsequently learned information. While it is the intent of the pre-qualification questionnaire and
documents required therewith to assist the City in determining bidder responsibility prior to bid and
to aid the City in selecting the lowest responsible bidder, neither the fact of pre~ualification, nor any
pre-qualification rating, will preclude the City from a post-bid consideration and determination of
whether a bidder has the quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the
proposed work, and has demonstrated the requisite trustworthiness. The City may refuse to grant
pre-qualification where the requested information and materials are not provided by the pre-
qualification statement deadline or are not provided at all. There is no appeal from a refusal for an
incomplete or late application, but re-application for a later project is permitted. The closing time for
bids will not be changed in order to accommodate supplementation of incomplete submissions or late
submissions.
DUE DATE AND LOCATION FOR PRE-QUALIFICATION STATEMENT SUBMITTALS:
Complete Pre-qualification Statements will be received at all times during normal business hours
prior to the Pre-qualification Statement Deadline, which is the hour of 2:00 P.M. on THURSDAY,
OCTOBER 16, 2003, at the Office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730. Pre-qualification Statements that arrive after the Pre-qualification
Statement Deadline, including mailed pre-qualification statements delivered after the specified
deadlines, will not be accepted, regardless of the time postmarked or otherwise indicated on the
envelope. All pre-qualification statements must be in writing and must contain an original signature
by an authorized officer of the firm. Electronic pre-qualification statements (i.e., telephonic, FAX,
etc.) are not acceptable. All pre-qualification statements shall clearly contain on the outside of the
sealed envelope in which they are submitted: CONFIDENTIAL PRE-QUALIHCATION
STATEMENT FOR "RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT". Contractors who submit a
complete pre-qualification package will be notified of their qualification status no later than ten
business days after submission of the information.
PRE-QUALIFICATION PACKAGE: Complete information regarding the pre-qualification
process, including the pre-qualification questionnaire, is included in the Pre-Qualification Package.
This package may be obtained from the City Clerk's office at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 91729 during regular working hours on any day that the City's offices are open
(Monday through Thursday, 7:00 A.M. to 6 P.M.), or may be downloaded from the City of Rancho
Cucamonga web site at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm.
DUE DATE AND LOCATION FOR SEALED BIDS: Sealed bids will be received at all times
during normal business hours prior to the Bid Opening, which is the hour of 2:00 P.M. on
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003, at the Office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids will be opened at the Bid Opening time stated, in the
Office of the City Clerk, or as otherwise posted. Bids that arrive after the specified Bid Opening
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 3 of 8
time, including mailed bids delivered after the specified deadlines, will not be accepted, regardless of
the time postmarked or otherwise indicated on the envelope. All bids must be in writing and must
contain an original signature by an authorized officer of the firm. Electronic bids (i.e., telephonic,
FAX, etc.) am not acceptable. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of TItE RANCItO
CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING
FOUNDATION PROJECT". Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City
Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
PROJECT MANUAL: The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and
specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, will be
available at the office of the City Engineer on or after October 27, 2003, and they will be furnished
upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $200.00 (TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS), said $200.00 (TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request
by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied
by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $50.00
(FIFI'Y DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead per each set of plans and
specifications. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not
been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS: Bidders must complete the Pre-qualification Statement
Form and submit all required information. A Bidder's failure to fully complete the form or to
adequately respond to the questions shall cause Contractor to fail to prequalify and to be ineligible as
a bidder. Prospective bidders should review the qualification requirements described in the Pre-
qualification Statement prior to any further inquiry.
MANDATORY PREBID CONFERENCE DATE AND LOCATION: A mandatory Prebid
Conference will be conducted on Monday, October 27°, 2003 at 10:00 AM. The Prebid
Conference will be held at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: There will be a $2500.00 assessment for each and every calendar day
work remains undone after date fixed for completion of the Project.
LABOR LAW AND PREVAILING WAGES: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar
character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 4 of 8
Department of Industrial Relations of the State of Califomia is required to and has determined such
general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on
file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship comrmttee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approx/al. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has
exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of
his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUT[ ~D1NG FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 5 of 8
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship,
San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before ment~ioned, for each calendar day
during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight
(8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
BID SECURITY: The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check,
or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of
the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same
is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between
the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS: The amount of the bond to be given to secure a
faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an
additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to
secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the
Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him
and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
q2.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 6 of 8
Should the Contractor elect to not self perform the concrete operations, including forming place and
finish that those subcontractors listed for such trades will be required to provide Payment and
Performance bonds to the Contractor subject to the same terms and conditions required of the
Contractor.
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE: Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form
and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be
performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "B" License (General Building
Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business
and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES: In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the
General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be
done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's
sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance
retention).
AWARD OF CONTRACT: The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract
satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to
reject any or all bids and to waive any informality or irregularity in any bid. Any contract awarded
will be let to the lowest pre-qualified responsive and responsible bidder.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 7 of 8
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for
"RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURES AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT"
may be directed to:
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2700, ext. 4040
Please see the following page
for formal adoption, certification and signatures
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUll DING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 8 of 8
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this October 15, 2003
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 2003.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City
Council held on the 15th day of October 2003.
Executed this 16th day of October 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 7 of 8
"RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES AND
BUILDING FOUNDATION PROJECT"
may be directed to:
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2700, ext. 4040
Please see the following page
for formal adoption, certification and signatures
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURES
AND BUll DING FOUNDATION PROJECT
October 15, 2003
Page 8 of 8
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this October 15, 2003
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 2003.
AYES: Alexander, Howdyshell, Kurth, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: Gutierrez
ABSTAINED: None
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City
Council held on the 15th day of October 2003.
Executed this 16th day of October 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGI~NEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Rel: rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: AP.PROVE RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A TARIFF FOR TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION POWER
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approve a resolution
modifying the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility tariff for temporary construction power.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and
operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services.
Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a
Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Application with Southern California Edison
Company for the provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. This development area will receive permanent
electric service from the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility via a proposed electrical
substation facility being built at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium
Parkway. This substation is scheduled to begin construction in Fall 2003 and be
operational prior to the Mall's scheduled operational date.
In the interim, it is necessary to provide the developer of the Mall with temporary power for
construction purposes. In order to account for and bill appropriately for the power used, it
was necessary to approve a tariff that establishes the rate for temporary power, which was
approved by City Council on June18, 2003. On August 1,2003, Southern California Edison
received approval from the California Public Utility Commission to modify its rate structure
reducing their tariffs. The reduction in Edison's rate was included with the City's feasibility
study and will have no impact to the City's Municipal Utility revenue forecasts.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Approval of a Resolution Establishing a Tariff for Temporary Construction Power
October 15, 2003
Page 2
In order for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility tariff rate to remain consistent with the
rate currently in use by Southern California Edison for similar power provision, staff is
requesting council to adopt a resolution modifying the current rate. This maintains
consistency with the guiding principle of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility to
maintain rates that do not exceed those currently in use by Edison.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MT:dlw
RESOLUTION NO. 0~.~"2'~' 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REVISING THE TARIFF FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
POWER
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously established itself
as a public utility and has previously been deemed by Southern California Edison to be
an "eligible customer" capable of receiving wholesale electricity and serving as a retail
supplier of electricity to a specific portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This area
is generally located in the eastern side of the City in the area commonly referred to as the
Victoria Arbors Master Plan area including the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall.
(ii) The developer of the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall requires
temporary power for the initiation of its construction operations. The need for temporary
power coincided with the commencement of the developer's construction operations, and
continues throughout the construction period of the mall facility.
(iii) The City, as the retail provider of electricity to this site, has
developed a plan for the provision of temporary power and will install all required
facilities such that power is delivered to the construction forces of the developer and
metered in accordance with standard utility practices.
(iv) The City established a tariff for electricity rates to properly bill and
collect for all electricity provided. This tariff, in accordance with one of the guiding
principles of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility, is to include rates that do not
exceed those currently in place and being charged by Southern California Edison.
(v) Southern California Edison revised its rates effective August 1,
2003. The revisions to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility tariffs is consistent
with the one of the guiding principles that rates do not exceed those currently in place and
being charged by Southern California Edison.
B. Resolution.
Section 1. This City Council hereby confirms the facts and
information set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution and hereby incorporates
them by reference in this Resolution.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approve the TP-I tariff for
temporary construction power as detailed below:
722528
,
TP-1
TEMPORARY POWER
NON-DEMAND
APPLICABILITY
Applicable to single-and three-phase general service including lighting and power, except
that the customer whose monthly maximum demand, in the opinion of the City, is
expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20kW in any three months during the
preceding 12 months is ineligible for service under this schedule. Effective with the date
of ineligibility of any customer served under this schedule, the customer's account shall
be transferred to another applicable rate schedule.
TERRITORY
Within the entire territory served.
ESTABLISHMENT OF TEMPORARY SERVICE
1. The applicant shall pay, in advance or otherwise as required by the City, the estimated
cost installed plus the estimated cost of removal, less the estimated salvage of the
facilities necessary for furnishing service.
2. Each applicant will be required to satisfactorily establish credit by either: (a) making
a cash deposit to secure payment of bills equal to twice the average monthly bill,
subject to adjustment, as estimated by the City; or (b) establishing credit to the
satisfaction of the City. Upon the discontinuance of electric service, the City will
refund the customer's deposit or the balance in excess of unpaid bills for service.
RATES
Customer charge .......................................................... $0.43000
Energy Charge - S/kWh (to be added to customer charge):
Summer, all kWh, per kWh ................................... $0.15956
Winter, all kWh, per kWh ...................................... $0.11908
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Summer and Winter Seasons are defined as follows:
The summer season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on the first Sunday in June and
continue until 12:00 a.m. of the first Sunday in October of each year. The winter
season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on the first Sunday in October of each year and
continue until 12:00 a.m. of the first Sunday in June of the following year. A pro rate
computation will be made for seasonal billing purposes.
722528 2
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Continued)
2. Voltage: Service will be supplied at one standard voltage.
3. Three-Phase Service: Where the City provides three-phase service, the billing will be
increased by $0.071 per day.
4. Excess Transformer Capacity: The amount of transformer capacity requested by a
customer, or required by the City, which is in excess of the applicable standard
transformer size determined by the City as required to serve the'customer's
measurable kilowatt demand. Excess Transformer Capacity shall be available to all
customers under this schedule and shall be billed at $0.03 per kVA per day.
5. Temporary Discontinuance of Service: Where the use of energy is seasonal or
intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service.
Any customer prior to resuming service within twelve months after such service was
discontinued will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if
service had not be discontinued.
RATE TABLE
Rate Table
Rate Schedule Summary Total
Energy Charge-S/kWh
Summer 0.15956
Winter 0.11908
Customer Charge-S/day 0.43
Three Phase Service-S/day 0.071
Excess Transformer
Capacity-$/kVA/day 0.03
722528 3 ~'~'2
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __ day of October,
2003.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at a meeting of said City Council
held on the __ day of October, 2003.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
722528 4
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
1~ ~C. INI~EI~IN C DIVI&ION
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR
THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND
COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that authorizes
staff to apply for grant funds for the Per Capita Grant Program under the California
Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Bond Act of
2002.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Per Capita Grant Program is intended to maintain a high quality of life for
California's growing population by providing a continuing investment in parks and
recreational facilities. Specifically, it is for the acquisition and development of
neighborhood, community and regional parks and recreation lands and facilities in
urban and rural areas.
Per Capita Grant funds are allocated on a population-based formula to cities, counties
and Districts. The allocation for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $603,000° No
matching contribution is required for the 2002 Resources Bond Act RZH Block Grant
Program.
Approval of Resolution for Per Capita Grant Program
October 15, 2003
Page 2
Eligible types of projects under this Grant Program include capital projects that will
provide lands and facilities for recreational activities and services. Funds received under
this Program will be used for the Central Park Senior/Community Center Project.
Cities and other eligible agencies must have a fully executed Contract with the State of
California Department of Parks and Recreation by June 30, 2006. All eligible projects
must be completed with final documentation submitted to the State by June 30, 2010.
Respectfully submitted,
William O. O'Neil
City Engineer
nESOLUT O..O. 03- 2S'<
A RESOLUT O. Or THE C TY COU.C L OF TRE
C TY Or RANC.O CUCAMO.GA APPROW.G
THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS
FOR PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR,
SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND COASTAL
PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Per Capita
Grant Program which provides funds for the acquisition and development of
neighborhood, community and regional parks and recreation lands and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been
delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up
necessary procedures, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks
and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the
approval of the Applicant to apply for the Per Capita allocation; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY:
1. Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance funds from the Per
Capita Grant Program under the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe
Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
maintain the Project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General
Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and
submit all documents including, but not limited to Applications, agreements,
payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of
projects.
Approved and Adopted on the 15th day of October, 2003.
Resolution 03-
October 15, 2003
Mayor
A3q'EST:
City Clerk
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
City Council following a roll call vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
City Clerk
R a N C H O C U C A M O N G A
'i~
]~ N G IN E El~ I ~ G DIVI&I 0 N
S ffRel rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR
THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT
OF 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that authorizes
staff to apply for grant funds for the Robert-Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant Program under
the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection
Bond Act of 2002.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris (RZH) Block Grant Program is intended to meet the urgent
need for safe, open and accessible local park and recreational facilities for increased
recreational opportunities that provide positive alternatives to social problems.
As a means of addressing these critical neighborhood park needs, the 2002 Bond Act
provides $186.7 million in funds to implement the RZH Program. The Block Grant funds
are allocated on a population-based formula to cities, counties and Districts. The
allocation for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $371,247. No matching contribution is
required for the 2002 Resources Bond Act RZH Block Grant Program.
Approval of Resolution for RZH Block Grant Program
October 15, 2003
Page 2
Eligible types of projects under this Grant Program include acquisition,
developmentJrehabilitation, and special major maintenance. A special major
maintenance project includes rehabilitation or refurbishing activities performed on an
annual or more infrequent interval, excluding capital improvements and routine or other
regularly scheduled and performed tasks such as grounds mowing, hedge trimming,
garbage removal and watering. Special major maintenance includes activities that will
reduce energy requirements to operate recreational lands or facilities. Funds received
under this Program will be used for the Central Park SeniodCommunity Center Project.
Cities and other eligible agencies must have a fully executed Contract with the State of
California Department of Parks and Recreation by June 30, 2006. All eligible projects
must be completed with final documentation submitted to the State by June 30, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
RESOLUTION NO. 0;3 - ~' 59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING
THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS
FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND COASTAL
PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the CALIFORNIA
CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND COASTAL
PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002 which provides funds for the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris
Block Grant Program for grants to eligible Applicants, and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been
delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State,
setting up necessary procedures, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks
and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by' resolution the
approval of the Applicant to apply for the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris allocation; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California for
the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY:
1. Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance funds from the Roberti-
Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant Program under the California Clean Water, Clean Air,
Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
maintain the Project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General
Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
4. Certifies that the Project conforms to the recreation element of any applicable city
or county general plan; and
5. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and
submit all documents including, but not limited to Applications, agreements,
payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of
projects.
Resolution 03-
October 15, 2003
Approved and Adopted on the 15th day of October, 2003,
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number
was duly adopted by the City Council following a roll call vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
City Clerk
I~AN C H 0 C U CAH,O N GA
Staff Report
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer "
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE
REMAINING PORTIONS OF TWO ALLEYS, GENERALLY WITHIN THE
NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON
BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, AND SETTING THE
DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 5, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the public
hearing for November 5, 2003, for the vacation (V-195) of the remaining portions of two
alleys, generally within the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron
Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue. In addition, said resolution authorizes the City
Clerk to cause same resolution to be published 14 days prior to the public hearing.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Nodhtown Housing Development Company (NTHDC) is currently processing
DRC2003-00328 for the construction of a parking lot expansion for the Northtown
Community Center. In conjunction with this processing, NTHDC has requested the
vacation of the remaining adjoining alleys that are contiguous to the Proposed parking
lot. In 2000, two other adjoining alleys were vacated, V-161 (Exhibit "E"), for the
existing parking lot area and Northtown Community Center. The remaining two alleys
they are requesting to be vacated are dirt and unimproved to City standards. They are
not being used for access by adjacent properties, as there are no visible openings from
the adjoining properties. Basically, these alleys are just "paper" alleys that were created
with the original North Cucamonga Subdivision and are not needed for public use.
Utilities companies, other agencies and various City Divisions have been notified of the
proposed vacation and were asked for comments. There were no objections to the
vacation from any of the groups notified. However, easements for various utilities will
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 15, 2003
Page 2
be reserved. The affected property owners will be notified by mail of the proposed
vacation, prior to City Council action on November 5, 2003.
The vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the
General Plan. The alleys in this area of the City are also not included or required as
"community travel routes" of the General Plan. On September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission determined the vacation conforms to the General Plan and recommended
the vacation occur.
Respectfully submitte.cl,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:VC:sc
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. ~)5'" 2 ~' ~)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
VACATE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ALLEYS GENERALLY
WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA
AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section
8300, et. Seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also know as
the Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate
remaining portions of alleys generally within the Northtown area
located on the south side of Fetch Boulevard, west of Hermosa
Avenue, as shown on Map No. V-195 on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, which has been further described in the legal
descriptions that are attached hereto marked Exhibits "A", and
"B" and by reference are made a part hereof.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 5t~ day of
November, 2003, at 7:00 PM in the CCWD Boardroom, located
at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the
time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed
vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City
street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes.
SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be
posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof
proposed to be vacated at least 14 days before the hearing, not
more than 300 fee apart and not less than three signs shall be
posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on
them and shall have the following title in the lettering not less
than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE
STREET."
SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and
exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record.
RESOLUTION NO.
October 15, 2003
Page 2
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall
attest to the same. and the City Clerk shall cause same to be
published 14 days before the date set for the hearing, at lease
once in Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ALLEY VACATION
THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCK 5 OF THE MAP OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA,
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 13 OF MAPS, PAGES 1 AND 2, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ..
PARCEL 1:
THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 20.00 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 155.00 FEET OF
BLOCK 5 OF MAP OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK
13, PAGES I AND 2 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, WHICH LIES WITH1N
LOTS 42 AND 43 OF SAID BLOCK 5 AS DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED IN
BOOK 4712 PAGE 324 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY-RECORDER OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
TOGETHER WITH THE UNDERLYING FEE TITLE IN AND TO THAT PORTION OF THE
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE ALLEY RUNNING EAST AND WEST THROUGH BLOCK 5 OF
MAPS OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 13, PAGES 1
AND 2 OF MAPS.
LYING NORTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO SAID WESTERLY 20.00 FEET OF THE
EASTERLY 155 FEET OF BLOCK 5, WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERakTION OF LAW
UPON THE VACATION THEREOF.
CONTAINS 3,403 SQUARE FEET
PARCEL 2:
THE UNDERLYING FEE TITLE IN AND TO THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EASTERLY 135
FEET OF THAT PORTION THE ALLEY RUNNING EAST AND WEST THROUGH BLOCK
5 OF MAPS OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 13,
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF MAPS.
LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO LOTS I THROUGH 6 OF SAID BLOCK 5,
WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW UPON THE VACATION THEREOF.
CONTA1NS 1,350 SQUARE FEET
PARCEL 3:
THE UNDERLYING FEE TITLE IN AND TO THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH I/2 OF
THE ALLEY RUNNING EAST AND WEST THROUGH BLOCK 5 OF MAPS OF THE
TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 13, PAGES I AND 2 OF
MAPS.
LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO LOTS 6 AND 7 OF SAID BLOCK 5,
WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW UPON THE VACATION THEREOF.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE EASTERLY 135 FEET
OF SAID ALLEY.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION PREVIOUSLY VACATED BY
RESOLUTION NO. 99-106, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED
MARCH 22, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2000-96332, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
CONTAINS 200 SQUARE FEET
PARCEL 4:
THE UNDERLYING FEE TITLE IN AND TO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE EASTERLY 135
FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY RUNNING EAST AND WEST THROUGH
BLOCK 5 OF MAPS OF THE TOWN OF WEST CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK
13, PAGES 1 AND 2 OF MAPS. \
LYING NORTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO LOTS 43 TO 48 OF SAID BLOCK 5
WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW UPON THE VACATION THEREOF.
CONTAINS 1,350 SQUARE FEET
AND AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
STEPHEN H. HACKETT, PLS 5129 DATE
MY REGISTRATION EXPIRES: IUNE 30,2007
Paue 2 of 2 oaRes D:\60042\LEGALS~allev vacation BLK 05.doc
~ N89'50'~O"W
~ ~0~-08~-2~
~ ~ag'~o'~
~ ~ ~oo~
- - :.,.. ~ ', >... -2o. oo'
.~ . EXISRNG RIGH~ TO BE
2o. oo'~ ~ ~o~-o~-o~ ~ ~s~o ~o sc~ yo~
~ . ,,, ~' ~ ,~. .~.~. ~. j ~ ~ '
PANCEL 1 ~ ~,~ 209-085-10
D~INAGE RIGH~ TO ~ NBg~49~
BE R~ERVED ON / / ~ 135.00'
2o. oo'~ ~ ~ ~
IHDI~TES PHOPOSED ALL~ VAC~ROH
ALZEY VA CA TION ~o. ~.
SCALE: 1" = 60' D~WN BY: JD DATE: 7/14/2003 CHECKED BY: SHH JN: 60040.01
, I
[
/
I } LOT 'd . ~*
' I ~1~
H ~,~ ~,~ ,,
,,, A. ~ B 8. ~ R.
I
CITY oF ~T~:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
ENGI~E~G~SION E~IT:
1,.15.00'
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ~'~
ENGINEERING DMSION EXHIBIT:
CITY OF ITEM:
TiTL~'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~.~
ENGINEERING DMSI_ON EXHIBIT:
'[HE CITY OF
I,~AN C H 0 C U CA H 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayer and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SUMMARILY VACATE A 10-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT
FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF COYOTE
CANYON PARK SUBMITTED BY KB HOME - APN: 1077-831-32 (V-194)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
vacation of a 10-foot wide easement for street tree maintenance purposes.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
KB Home is currently processing Tract 15724 for a residential subdivision of town
houses on 9.05 acres of land. In conjunction with this processing, KB Home has
requested the vacation of a 10-foot wide easement for street tree maintenance
purposes that is contiguous to the property. Said easement is located on the south side
of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park and was dedicated to the City on
September 17, 1991, in anticipation for usage for a school site. Once vacated, said
easement area will be part of Tract 15724.
Utility companies, other agencies and various City divisions have been notified of the
proposed vacation and were asked for comments. There were no objections to the
vacation from any of the groups notified.
KB Home will be installing street trees within a normal parkway. The vacation is
consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the street tree
easement is presently being replaced by normal parkway trees and therefore will be
part of Tract 15724.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
V-195 KB HOME
October 15, 2003
Page 2
On September 24, 2003, the Planning Commission determined the vacation conforms
to the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~/J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:WV:sc
Attachment
C~T~ O~ rr~
~A~CHO CUCAMO~aA ~n'~.~ Vl~!~_ /?? ~,~
ENGINEERING DIVISION.
RESOLUTION NO. O,.I,~'',~ ~' /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION CFA 10-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT
FOR STREET TREES MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF
COYOTE CANYON PARK - APN: 1077-831-32 (V-194)
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway
Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate
the 10-foot wide easement for street tree maintenance purposes, located on the south side
of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said easement is
unnecessary for present or prospective street tree maintenance purposes because it has
not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was
expended for maintenance of same.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
makes its order vacating the said 10-foot wide easement for street tree maintenance,
located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, as
described in Exhibit "A", and shown on Exhibit "B".
SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said 10-foot
wide easement for street tree maintenance purposes no longer constitutes a public use
easement.
SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservation and
exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
EXHIBIT "A"
STREET TREE EASEMENT VACATION
RE: TR. 15724, M~B. 291/68-71
THE NORTH I0.00 FEET OF LOT I OF TRACT NO. 15724, MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE NORTHERLY LlNE OF SAlD LOT, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER MAP
THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 291, PAGES 68 THROUGH 71, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY~ ALSO BEING
DESCRIBED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1991, AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 91-371716, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" AWl'ACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED BY MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
WILLIAM ROARO JASSO, P.L.S. 4756
EXPIRATION DATE: 9/30/2003 ~lo. 41156
EXHIBIT 'B"
FOR EASEMENT VACATION
'"'~""~'---'"'""'"'-- - -"D TO "oR Sin
A~c'" 0 uu pl:.r~ I/~ '-', '
~' NcH C[ -37
TRACT NO., 15124' \'
M.B. 291/ 68-71
\
\
\
I~ IdADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMOI~GA
i~l CO.SULT,NG C,~ E.~.E~ES TRACT 15724
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E~IGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRe rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AWARD OF AN ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR
STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING MAINTENANCE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW, UPON MUTUAL
CONSENT, FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD, UP TO A TOTAL
OF AN ADDITIONAL FOUR YEARS, TO TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, INC. OF
POMONA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $102,555.00 AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,255.00, FUNDED FROM FUND 11703035300
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize the execution of an annual
contract for street striping and pavement marking maintenance for fiscal year 2003/04, with
an option to renew, upon mutual consent, for additional one (1) year periods, up to a total of
an additional four (4) years, to Traffic Operations, Inc. of Pomona in the amount of
$102,555.00 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$10,255.00, funded from Fund 11703035300.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
City Council approved the funds for striping and pavement marking maintenance in Fund
11703035300 in the fiscal year 2003/04 budget document.
There are approximately 150 miles of streets in the City. On almost every street, there are
painted lane lines, crosswalks, raised pavement markers, arrows and legends. There are
over 12,000 assorted "Stop" and other painted legends in the City. Painted traffic stripes
fade over time. It is staff's goal to repaint every stripe and legend at least once every year.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Annual Striping and Pavement Marking Maintenance Contract
October 15, 2003
Page 2
The Engineering Department provided specifications to Purchasing for street striping and
pavement marking maintenance. Purchasing prepared a formal request to bid and sent it
to six (6) vendors. An additional three companies downloaded the RFB from the intemet.
Six (6) responses were received. Traffic Operations, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive
bid. Out of twenty-one estimated items, Traffic Operations, Inc. has the lowest prices on
thirteen items and the lowest overall annual cost. Attached is the abstract of the bids
received.
Staff has checked their references from three cities and they all indicated that this company
has provided very good services in a timely manner and is competent to do the job.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi~J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:JAG
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REMARKS: JNole: The #2 vendor does not have the C32 Contractor's License that was called out in
AliT RACT OF BIOIthe RFB. but does have an A license
I
RECEIVED FOR:
BID NO.: s Maintenance Contract
I 2 3 4
Vendor Nam~ Fraffic Operations Sudhakar Co C-~8, Inc. PCl
Contact Nam~ ~lichael ~zzi Steve Fleenet Michael Hathaway William Jacob
Phone NO ){}9-865-2935 g09-879-2933 909-845-3099 562-21E-0504
re,ms: Net 30 Terms: Net 30 Terms: Net 30 Terms: Net 30
Oe$c,l~ie~ ef ~tem, to qu~e Ch~ M~:lel Unit Cost Ext. Cost Model Unit Cost 0 Model Unit Cost Ext. Cost Model Unit Cost Ext. Cost
~.~f~..~ ...................................................... ~ ..................................... q~ .............. ~,~..~ ..................................... q=f~ ............. C~..~ ................................ ~7 ................. ~ ~F~°°
TwoW. Lo, Turn ~lh ~e. 4' ri~= 5000(] O08S 4450~ ...................... q:7.~ ................. [!.~(~. [~ ............... 0.13! ........ ~..~.~ 0.110 5 500 O~
~.~.~:!n~!U:!q~. ............................................. !.o~q~ ..................... 9.s30 __ C_.~o~ ...................... q:~o~ .................. ~.~o~..~_ _ _ ~ ................ ~.~e.~:~ _ A~ 56oo.oc
,~r[~.:~l,~..l~( ............................................... ~..~o~.~ ....................................... Z:~ ..................... ~,?~9:.~ ...................................... 1.~:Z~ ............... ~.~..0~ ...................................... ~.~.0~ .............. ~.~:~:~ ........................................ !.~..
.......................... E~ ................................................................................................ ; : .... . .600 6.400 0[~
~.~ ~.~.~_o...v.~!..:.._w.. ~. ~ ~!~!!,~..~. ...'~P2~ ..................................... ~:~ ...................... ~,~R~. ~ ................................... !.:~q ................. q,~.q..~ .................... P:~ .................... ~.P~;~ _ ~:.~.~ ............ C~qq:~q
~r~!~.~a ×~n~e~,~!. ~r~ ............................ ~ .................................... t:~o .................. .U.,~.~..~ ............................... !.:~ ............. ~,~°~:.9~ ......................................... !.:.!.~ .......~..~:og. ........ ~f ............ L'~f~
i~ ~a !!~..?~.~ ~.o~.~[~,i ............................. ~EE NOTE ABOVE
~:!~[ .......................................................................................................................... 1~]~.~5~:.f ......................................................... ~.~.~.,~]~:.~ ..................................... !,~.~74 ~ .................................... ~..~ .,~_.~
Vendor Narm Chrisp Co Orange County Stripin~l Service
,~: ~3~r~ L~ .................................................. ~ .................................... 0_:.0~(~ .................. !.2 ~:.~ 0.070 21 03000 0.(30 00(3
...... 0 120 6 O00(X 0 DO 5 000 O0 000 ............................................. ~:..~...
!;.~!!,~ P.~ ......................................................... !~.og_ ............................... _q:o~q.......................... ~,o~ ................ oo~o ~ooo ............................ o.oo o.oo
.............................................................................. .fi~p ................................ ~:opo ................ ~,~..~ 6.000 24.o,o~.oo
22.000 4 400 O~ 20.00( 4,0~0.0( 0.0( 00(
................ .1~ ................................................... 30 ................... _ .~.:~ ................... ~.~.~..(~ ................. 125000 3,7500( 00(
!:. ~!!~..~!~.~. ~!~!~ ........................ !~ !.:~ ................... ~.,~:.~ ....................... :::::::::: :~:~:: i'.~:~ o
....... ~ ............................. ~o ~.ooo 2~.~ ,.oo< ~oo< ............
o.o~ ................................... o~
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ~.o_..~ .............................................................
o.oc ........................................... q.o~
............................. 150( g,o00 O( 0(~
............................................................................................ 128 000 00 140 820.0C
I~ A C H O C U C a M O N G A
I~ N GINI~I~I~ING DI~PAD'~IViI~N¥
Staff Report
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Catron, Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECr: APPROVE A CONTRACT RENEWAL WITH U.S. GUARDS, INC. (CO 01-060) TO
JUNE 30, 2004 IN THE AMOUNT OF $159,333 AND APPROVE AN ADDITIONAL
$73,217 FOR ANTICIPATED EXTRA WORK RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION AND
ADDITIONAL FACILITIES TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($25,750), 1133303-
5304 ($117,800), 1700201-5304 ($69,000), AND 1290601-5300 ($20,000); APPROVE AN
APPROPRIATION OF $28,497 FROM CAPITAL RESERVE BALANCE TO 1025001-
55650/10251382-0 FOR TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICE AT THE 12 kV
ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND STADIUM PARKWAY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract renewal with U.S. Guards, Inc. (CO 014}60) to June
30, 2004 in the amount of $159,333 and approve an additional $73,217 for anticipated extra work related to
construction and additional facilities to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($25,750), 1133303-5304 ($117,800),
1700201-5304 ($69,000), and 1290601-5300 ($20,000); approve an appropriation of $28,497 from Capital
Reserve Balance to 1025001-5650/10251382-0 for temporary security service at the 12 kV Electrical Substation
Project to be located at the southeast comer of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On April 2, 2003, City Council approved a contract extension with U.S. Guards, Inc. to provide security services
at the Metrolink Station, Civic Center, Epicenter and add the Library to the scope of service. Staff has received a
letter from U.S. Guards acknowledging their desire to continue this contract with no increase in hourly rates. With
the extensive increase in construction activity for City-owned facilities, additional extra work is expected and has
been included in the 2003-04 approved budget. On September 17, 2003, City Council approved the award of a
contract to begin construction of an electrical substation to service the property within the Victoria Arbors Master
Plan area designated as part of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area. During construction,
surveillance will be required to protect the site during the night and weekend hours. This project is scheduled for
completion by February 2004.
The City continues to receive excellent response from this vendor and staff recommends extending this contract to
June 30, 2004.
Resp~-ct fully submitted,
Willh_~ J. 0 Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
F~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING D E PART,lENT
SlaffReport
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Catron, Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVE A CONTRACT RENEWAL WITH COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES (CO
00-102) TO JUNE 30, 2004 IN THE AMOUNT OF $180,500 AND APPROVE AN
ADDITIONAL $62,500 FOR ANTICIPATED EXTRA WORK RELATED TO
CONSTRUCTION, REMODELING AND ADDITIONAL FACILITIES TO BE FUNDED
FROM 1001312-5304 ($240,000), AND 1700201-5304 ($3,000)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract renewal with Coastal Building Services. (CO 00-102)
to June 30, 2004 in the amount of $180,500 and approve an additional $62,500 for anticipated extra work related
to construction, remodeling and additional facilities to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($240,000) and 1700201-
5304 ($3,000).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Through competitive bid in 1999, Coastal Building Services was determined to be the lowest, responsible,
resp.~nsive bidder for Citywide Janitorial Service and on December 20, 2000, City Council gave approval to
contiCue the contract agreement with Coastal Building Services. Since that time Coastal has performed well, has
remained responsive and has adapted quickly to the recent changes related to remodeling/construction of the
Police Station. Coastal has indicated their interest to continue the contract at the existing hourly rates. Staff
recommends that the City Council approve the contract renewal with Coastal Building Services.
Restfully submitted,
Wil'liffm J. O Neil
City Engineer
WIO:DC:ju
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO:, Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Gary Varney, Streets and Fleet Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVE A CONTRACT RENEWAL WITH JDC, INC. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
(CO 01-075), TO JUNE 30, 2004 FOR THE "CITY WIDE CONCRETE REPAIR, TREE
REMOVAL AND TREE PLANTING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" FOR
REPAIR OF CITY SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$350,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1176303-5300
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract renewal with JDC, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga (CO
01-075) to June 30, 2004 for the "City' Wide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual
Maintenance Agreement" for repair of city sidewalks, curb and gutters in the amount of $350,000 to bc funded
from 1176303-5300.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Through competitive bid in 2001, JDC, Inc. was determined to be the lowest, responsible, responsive bidder for
City Wide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement. Since that time,
JDC, Inc. has provided excellent service, has followed the specifications to the letter, and has met the expectations
of the City and residents. JDC, Inc. is a very conscientious contractor who has received very few complaints, all
of which have been resolved swiftly. This contract is re-negotiable on a year-to-year basis and JDC, Inc. has
indicated their interest to continue the contract at the existing rates. Staff recommends that the City Council
approve the contract renewal with JDC, Inc.
Re~pec[~u~lly submitted,
Wil~ia~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,275,114.00 TO THE APPARENT
LOW BIDDER, DOUBLE D PIPELINE, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,511.40
FOR THE MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT 2003-01, TO BE FUNDED FROM CFD 2003-01 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
16143035650
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $1,275,114.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Double D
Pipeline, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $352,241.00,
for the Mall On-Site Water and Sewer of Community Facilities District 2003-01, to be funded from
CFD 2003-01 funds, Account No. 16143035650.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on October 2, 2003, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $1,479,220.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities
to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Respectfully submittet~,
City Engineer
WJO:WS/RO:Is
Attachment
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING OCTOBER 2, 2003 .4pparent Low Bidder
MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY ENGINEERS C.P. Construction Co.,
FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 ESTIMATE Double D Pipeline; Inc. Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO (~TY UNIT !DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. LS Mobil~ation $25,000.00 $50,000.CO $8,654.o0 $17,308.01 $6,500~0~ $13,000,00
3. LS ~nv'iroltmental C onlplia~ce (SWppp} $51000.00 $ iOlOO0.o0 $21200.~o $41400.0( $31500.00 $71000.00
4. 1080~ LF ?ublic 12"-10 Gage CML&C Water $42.00 $453~600.00 539.00 $421~2oo.0( $34.5(] $372~600.00
5. 695~ LF ?ublic 8"-I0 Gage CML&C Waer 535.00 $243,250.00 $24.00 $1661800.0( $29.50 $205~025.00
6. EA ¢~ & Vacum Rel~se Valve $750.00 $750.00 $1~765.00 $1~765.0( $1~500.00 $1~$00.o0
7.' 15 EA ?ublic 12'-45 De~ree Flanged l~bow $500.00 $?~500.oo $1~037.00 $151555.0( $650.00 $91750,00
'l EA ~ublic 12"-22.5 De~l~e Flanged Elbow $500.00 $500.00 $1,133.00 $1~133.0( $650.00 $650.00
EA ~ublic 12"- I 1.25 Degree Flanged Elbow $500.00 $41000.00 $1~133.00 $91064.0( $650.0(I $5~200.oo
19 EA Public 12" x 12" x 8" Flanged Tee $800.00 $51600,00 $l~158.00 $8~106.0( $850,00 $5~950,00
20 EA 12" x 6" Flansed Tee $400,O0 $21000.00 $11141.00 $5~705.0( $850,00 $4~250,00
21 EA 12" x 12" Flanfied Tee $400.OO $400.00 $1~195.00 $¥95.0( $11000.00 $11000.00
22 65 EA Public Fire H¥c~nt Assembly $2~300,00 i $149t500.00 $2~864.00 $186~160.0( $2~350,00 $152~750,00
23 2 EA 12" x 12" x 12" Flange~l Tee $975.00 $1~950.00 $1~195.00 $21390.0( $1~450.00 $2~900.oo
25 6 EA Public 12" x 8" x 12" x 8" Flan~ed Cross $1~550.00 $91300.00 $11410.00 $81460.0( $1~950.00 $11~700.OO
28. EA Public 8"-22.5 De~ree Flan~ed Elt~w $400.00 $400.00 $652.00 $652.0( $350,00 $350,00
31. EA Public 8" x 8" x 8" n 8" Flanged Cross $1~250.00 $1 ~250.00 $1 ~020.00 $11020.0( $950.{30 $950.00
32. 15 ' I~F Public 4" Fi~ Se~ice Line $50,00 $750,00 $27.00 $405.0C $45.00 $675.00
33. 420 LF Public 6" Fire Service Line $30.00 $121600,00 $25.00 $101500.o( $49.00 $20~580.00
36. I LF 4" Domestlc Meter $1~600.00 $1~600.00 $1 ~454.00 $1~454.0C $2t850.00 $21850.00
37. 300 LF Public 3" Domestic Service Line $25.00 $7~500.00 $23,00 $6~900.0( $32.00 $9~600.00
38. 5 EA Public I" Domestic Meter and Box $800.00 $4~000.00 $318.00 $I~590.0~ $550.00 $2~750.0(
39. 6 EA Public 1,5' Domeslle Meter and Box $1~000.00 $6~000.00 $426.00 $21556.0£ $850.00 $5~100.0(
43 EA Public 2" Domestic Meter Box $ 11200,00 $71200.00 $456,00 $21736.0~ $350.00 $2~ 100.0(
44. 41 EA Publie 3" Domestic Meter Box $11400,00 $641400.00 $1~083.00 $491818.0~ $450.00 $201700.0(
45. 41 EA Public 1.5" Do~stic Sen4c~ Lint ~30,00 $11200.00 $14.00 $56Q.0~ $35.00 $1,400.0(
46 EA Public Blow-off Assembly $2r000.00 $6~0OO.00 $780.00 $2T340.OC $495.00 $1~485.00:
48. EA Pubbc 6" Fire Detector Check Valve $7,000,00 $28~000.00 $821.00 I $3~254.0C $3~450.00 $13r800.0(
49' 137; LF 8" VCP Sewer Main $35,00 $481195.00 $38.00 I $521326.0C $39.50 $541391.50!
51. EA ~" Plug $200.00 $400.00 $52.00 $104.0C $350.00 $700.0(
TOTAL $114791220.00 $112751114.0~ $11642~656.5(
Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING OCTOBER 2, 2003
MALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER OF COMMUNITY Utah Pacific
FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 Murray Company Gentry Brothers, Inc. Construction Co.
UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT
NC QTY UNIT DESCP-JPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOIj~rr COST AMOUNT
I 2 LS Mobilization $30~000.0( S601000.0C $501~0~.00i $ 100t000.0C $100t000.00 $171000.00 $34~000.0(
Page 2
VICINITY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01
ON-SITE AND CULTURAL DRIVE WATER AND SEWER
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRe rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR
DR 99-40, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOURTH STREET
AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY AIRPORT CORPORATE
CENTER, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for DR 99-40 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it
is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to
file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance
Bonds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of DR 99-50, located on the northwest corner of Fourth
Street and Archibald Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the
existing Faithful Performance Bonds.
Developer: Airport Corporate Center, LLC
Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 2903982 $93,600.00
Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 3418975 $88,700.00
(Fourth St. Improvements)
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~'fi/J. O'Neil
City Engineer
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-40 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 99-40 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and
file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
CITY OF ITEM: DB 99-40
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT: "A"
ENGINEEXING DIVISlOH
lNG IN I [iI~ING D~ PAI~T~I~N T
StaffRe rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William d. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF $195,300.00 MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT
MAP 12659-4, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA
AND WILSON AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the $195,300.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract Map 12659-4, located at the southwest corner of
Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer Bond No. Amount
Centex Homes 5927987-1 $195,300.00
2280 Wardlow Circle Suite 150
Corona, CA 91720
Attention: Margaret Taulane
Respectfully submitted,
William d. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WAV:sc
WILSON AVENUE
CITY OF IT~:
~c~o c~c~o~ ~~/r-~~f~~l
~GIN~.E~ING DIVISION
f~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING D E PAR Till E N T
StaffRe rt
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 14380,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHVqEST CORNER OF WILSON AND ETIWANDA
AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY MASTERCRAFT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee
Bond, for Tract 14380, located at the northwest comer of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues submitted by
MasterCraft.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from
defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: MasterCraft
400 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 290
Santa Ana, CA 92705-3829
Release: Bond No. SD00076261 $10,300
Bond No. SD00076264 $ 8,950
Bond No. SD00076263 $ 8,540
Bond No. SD00076266 $ 3,840
Bond No. SD00076260 $50,900
Respectfully submitted,
WilliamS. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
CITY OF'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: Tract/~'3~'O
ENGINEERING DIVISION 9 / EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FFIO~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 15911,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE SOUTH OF VICTORIA
STREET, SUBMITTED BY RYLAND HOMES
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15911, located on the east side of East Avenue south of Victoria
Street submitted by Ryland Homes.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Ryland Homes
5740 Fleet Street, Suite 200
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Release: Bond No. 103737626M $121,100.00
Respectfully submitted,
Willia'rfl J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
CITY OF NORTH ~'~ NTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: Tracts 15911 and 15912
ENGINEERING DIVISION TITLE: Vicinity Ma~3
r~ A iXl C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEP^RTMENT
Staff
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF $32,000.00 MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR
TRACT NO.15963, LOCATED WEST OF LONDON AND NORTH OF
LEMON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CRESTWOOD CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the
Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for $32,000.00, located west of London Avenue and
north of Lemon Avenue, submitted by Crestwood Corporation.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period bas ended and the street improvements
remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Crestwood Corporation
211 W. Foothill Blvd.
Glendora, Ca. 91741
Release: Maintenance Bond Bond No. 816454S $32,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JES
Attachments
CITY OF rlTAV~:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITL~
ENGI1VgERING DIVISION EXI-rI-~IT:
]~AN Cfi 0 CIJCAHONGA
Sa Repor
DATE: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - A request to
amend the General Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate
portions of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a Secondary
Street to a Collector Street and Modified Collector Street - APN: 0229-021-62,
63, and 64. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00616,
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839,
and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. An Environmental Impact
Report was previously certified in October 2001. The addendum is being
prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to amend Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code to re-designate the Industrial
Districts Subarea 8 portion of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard,
east of Rochester Avenue from a Secondary Street to a Modified Local,Collector
Street - APN: 0229-021-20, 34, 47, 53, 54, and 55. Related Files: General Plan
Amendment GPA2.002-00002, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional
Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858.
An Environmental Impact Report was previously certified in October 2001. The
addendum is being prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA2.002-00002, DRC2003-00616, SUBTPM16033, DRC2002-00839, DRC2003-00858
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 2
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - A request to subdivide 60 acres
of land into 12 parcels and pubic right-of-way dedication as part of a proposed
shopping center on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commemial District
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00858. An Environmental Impact Report was previously
certified in October 2001. The addendum is being prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act.
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - The review of the site
plan and architectural elevations for a proposed shopping center of up to
315,000square feet, including in-line retail stores and individual retail pad
buildings, on 60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related
Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62,
63, and 64. Related Files: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-O0002,
Development Code Amendment DCA2003-00616, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16033, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. An
Environmental Impact Report was previously certified in October 2001. The
addendum is being prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act.
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - The review of a
Development Agreement for a proposed shopping center of up to
315,000 square feet, that includes in-line retail stores and individual retail pad
buildings on 60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related
Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62,
63, and 64. Related Files: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002,
Development Code Amendment DCA2003-00616, Tentative Pamel Map
SUBTPM16033, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839. An
Environmental Impact Report was previously certified in October 2001. The
addendum is being prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION: At its September 24, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the subject General Plan Amendment, Development Code
Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit, and Development Agreement. In
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, SUBTPM16033, DRC2002-00839, DRC2003-00858
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 3
addition, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Addendum to the Final
Environmental Impact Report in accordance with CEQA.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject applications, if approved, provide for the re-
classification of Day Creek Boulevard as a part of the development of a major shopping center
at the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill and Day Creek Boulevards. An
accompanying Tentative Pamel Map and Conditional Use Permit have been processed along
with these applications for the development of the shopping center. The design of the center
accommodates the extension of Day Creek Boulevard to Rochester Avenue and the potential
realignment of the 1-15 Freeway on-ramp. The Development Agreement has been proposed in
concert with the various applications to facilitate and coordinate the overall development of the
project. For a detailed analysis please refer to the Planning Commission staff reports (Exhibit
"A")
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
CONCLUSION: If the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission it
would be appropriate to approve General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development
Code Amendment DRC2003-00616, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use
Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858, by adoption of the
attached Resolutions and Ordinances and authorize the execution of the Development
Agreement.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:AVV~Is
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Reports dated September 24, 2003
Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002
Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616
Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033
Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839
Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development Agreement DRC2003-00856
T H C I T Y 0 F
~AN C. 0 ClJ CAMONGA
DATE: September 24, 2003
TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to
amend the General Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate
portions of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a
Secondary Street to a Collector Street and Modified Collector Street - APN:
0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00858. (Continued from September 10, 2003.)
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to amend Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code to re-designate the
Industrial Districts Subarea 8 portion of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill
Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue from a Secondary Street to a Modified
Local Collector Street - APN: 0229-021-20, 34, 47, 53, 54, and 55. Related
Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use Permit
DRC2002-00839, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. (Continued
from September 10, 2003.)
BACKGROUND: The subject applications were continued from the SEPTEMBER 10,
2003, meeting at the request of the applicant. This request was in order to work on
modifications to the accompanying Development Agreement and to address procedural
issues regarding the conditions of approval of the accompanying Conditional Use Permit and
parcel map.
The changes have been made and the applications with recommended conditions are ready
for Commission review and action. Refer to the staff report of September 10, 2003, and the
Resolutions accompanying this report for the discussion of issues and conditions of approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA2002-00002 AND DCA DRC2003-00616
September 24, 2003
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: The City Traffic Engineer and Planning staff recommend that the
Planning Commission forward the applications to the City Council with recommendations for
the changing of the mad classification of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Foothill Boulevard,
to a Collector and a Modified Collector Street as requested in the subject applications and as
described in the attached Resolutions and draft Ordinance.
Respecffull submitted,
City Planner
BB:AW'~Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Planning Commission Staff Report, September 10, 2003
Revised Resolution Recommending Approval for G PA2002-00002
Revised Resolution Recommending Approval for DCA2003-00616
THE CITY OF
~111[
]~ANCHO CUCAH ONGA
S rff Reloor
DATE: September 10, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to amend
the General Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate portions of
Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a Secondary Street to a
Collector Street and Modified Collector Street - APN: 0229-021-62, 63, and 64.
Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use Permit
DRC2002-00839, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. (Continued
from August 27, 2003.)
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to amend Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code to re-designate the Industrial
Districts Subarea 8 portion of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard,
east of Rochester Avenue from a Secondary Street to a Modified Local Collector
Street - APN: 0229-021-20, 34, 47, 53, 54, and 55. Related Files: Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and
Development Agreement DRC2003-00858. (Continued from August 27, 2003.)
BACKGROUND: These requests are part of a shopping center development proposal for the
future southeast and southwest corners of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek
Boulevard. The future Day Creek Boulevard has been planned to traverse the area in previous
General Plan editions, as well as the current 2001 update. This request will not change the
general purpose within the City traffic model, it simply provides for a re-designation, and
resultant reconfigured cross-section of the roadway.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The requested commercial project, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839,
consists of a proposed shopping center with a potential for up to 315,000 square feet of
floor area. The General Plan shows Day Creek Boulevard continuing south of Foothill
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA2002-00002 AND DRC2003-00616
September 10, 2003
Page 2
Boulevard through the project site as a Secondary Street. The applicant has provided a
traffic study that outlines the potential of reducing the roadway classification, currently a
Secondary Street, to a Collector and Modified Collector Street.
Traffic volumes for the year 2025 were projected using the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan (CTP), traffic and truck model, maintained by the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG). The study was prepared in accordance with Congestion
Management Program (CMP) guidelines. The study found that Day Creek Boulevard
would operate at an acceptable level of service as either a Secondary Street or as a
Collector Street. Therefore, it is anticipated by the City Traffic Engineer that Day Creek
Boulevard, south of Foothill Boulevard can be successfully designed and operated as a
Collector and Modified Collector Street.
The Subarea 8 section of the Industrial Districts (Chapter 17.30) of the Development Code
identifies that portion of the Day Creek Boulevard extension from the utility corridor west to
Rochester Avenue as a Secondary Street. Therefore, to keep the street categories
consistent between the General Plan and Development Code, a Development Code
Amendment was initiated by staff, with the approval of the Planning Commission, for this
purpose.
B. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October
17, 2001, as the Final EIR for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update.
The Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15166 provide that
when a Program EIR has been certified, subsequent activities in the program must be
examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional
environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that no new effects could
occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the
activity as being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the applicant has
proposed modifications to the Master Plan Circulation System, an Addendum to the 2001
General Plan Final EIR was prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in
the Program EIR have been incorporated into the project design.
In summary, the addendum analyzes, a) The potential of changing Day Creek Boulevard
(south of Foothill Boulevard) from a Secondary Street to a Collector classification; b) the
addition of a project specific development, of up to 315,000 square feet, at the south side
of Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard; and c) whether these actions are within the
scope of the previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final
Environmental Impact Report. The proposed commercial development will result in
impacts at levels anticipated for commercial development of the site in the recent General
Plan Update.
An addendum to the previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan
Final Environmental Impact Report is the appropriate documentation because some
changes and additions are necessary to allow for the development, as anticipated within
the General Plan General Commercial designation of the site. The addendum identified
that there are no substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the
previous EIR. The appropriate findings of the addendum are included in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA2002-00002 AND DRC2003-00616
September 10, 2003
Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: The City Traffic Engineer and Planning staff recommend that the
Planning Commission forward the applications to the City Council with recommendations for the
changing of the road classification of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Foothill Boulevard, to a
Collector and a Modified Collector Street as requested in the subject applications and described
in the attached Resolutions and draft Ordinance.
City Planner
BB:AW/jm
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Location Map
Exhibit "B"- Addendum to City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final
EIR
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment
G PA2002-00002
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616
Location Map
IDRC2002-00839
SUBTPM16033
Rt.
DCA2003-00616 .c N
Exhibit"^" /~/
FOOTHILL CROSSING
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADDENDUM TO
ClTY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
2001GENERALPLANFINALEIR
Project Files:
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00839
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16033
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858
Project Applicant:
O & S Holdings, LLC
DATE OF PREPARATION
July 21,2003
PREPARED BY:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
EXHIBIT "B"
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL EIR
1. PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM
This addendum to the previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001
General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Public Resoumes Code Section 21000, et seq and the CEQA Guidelines California
Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a)
states that "the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to
a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred." Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, a
subsequent EIR is only required when: a) substantial changes are proposed in the
project or; b) substantial changes have occurred with respect to the cimumstances
under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions to the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect, or c)
new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete that shows that (i) the project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; or (ii) significant
effects previously examined will be substantially more severe that shown in the
previous EIR; or (iii) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be
feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment of the project, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (iv) mitigation measures
or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous
EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment
but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative."
This Addendum analyzes the differences between the transportation master plan,
which was previously approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General
Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, and the currently proposed transportation
master plan street segments as proposed by the Proposed Project.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the changes associated with
the project, and changes in the 'master plan transportation designation of Day
Creek Boulevard from a Secondary Street to a Collector Street, are minor and are
not considered substantial. No new significant impacts will result from these
changes, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of any previously
identified environmental impacts. In addition, there are no substantial changes
with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that
would require any revisions to the previously certified Final EIR. These
conclusions have been reached based on the preparation of technical analyses, as
necessary, to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project
and the proposed changes in the master plan transportation designation of Day
Creek Boulevard from a Secondary Arterial Street to a Collector Street. Therefore,
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL EIR
Page 2
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the
previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001General Plan Environmental
Impact Report is the appropriate environmental documentation.
2. LOCATION
The site covers approximately 60 acres generally located at the southwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway in Rancho Cucamonga, as depicted in
Exhibit 1. Existing and planned land uses surrounding the project site include the
following:
· North: The existing land use currently remains as a vineyard; the planned
land use includes The Victoria Arbors Village master plan and the
Victoria Gardens Regional Mall.
· South: 1-15 Freeway
· East: Declining vineyard, with a General Commemial Land use
designation.
· West: Southern California Edison (SCE) Corridor
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The approximate 60 acre site contains a declining vineyard, and supports
approximately 13 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub. The elevation of the site is
between 1160 and 1200 feet above mean sea level sloping from north to south.
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As depicted in the attached Exhibit, the project applicant, O & S Holdings, LLC, is
requesting an amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan to
modify the Transportation Section in Chapter III to re-designate the portion of Day
Creek Boulevard, which is south of Foothill Boulevard, from a secondary arterial
street to a collector street. In addition, a Development Code amendment of
Chapter 17.30 Industrial Districts Subarea 8, is proposed to re-designate the
portion of Day Creek Boulevard, which is south of Foothill Boulevard, from a
secondary arterial street to a collector street. The proposed project consists of a
proposed shopping center with a potential for up to 315,000 square feet. The
project could include 183,500 square feet of in-line retail stores, eleven individual
retail building pads totaling 89,700 square feet, of which three are intended for
restaurants (two of which may include drive-through capability). The project also
includes a Tentative Parcel Map proposing to subdivide the 60 acre site into
12 parcels.
The applications propose that the City of Rancho Cucamonga take the following
actions associated with the proposed Project to implement the General Plan:
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002 - A request to amend the General
Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate the portion of Day Creek
Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a secondary street to a collector street.
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL EIR
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616 - A request to amend Chapter
17.30 of the Development Code, Industrial Districts Subarea 8, to re-designate the
portion of Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a 100-foot Special
Boulevard to a modified local collector street.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00839 - The review of the site plan and
architectural elevations for a proposed shopping center with a potential for up to
315,000 square feet, which could include 183,500 square feet of in-line retail stores,
eleven individual retail building pads totaling 89,700 square feet, of which three are
intended for restaurants (two of which may include drive-through capability).
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT16033 - A request to subdivide the 60 acre property
into 12 parcels and public right-of-way dedication.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858 - A request to establish a process for
financing the construction of Day Creek Boulevard within the Foothill Crossing Shopping
Center, located on the southwest and southeast corners of Day Creek and Foothill
Boulevards as provided for in Section 65864 of the California Government Code for real
property - APN: 210-082-53 thru 57.
5. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other
CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier
EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified
above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the
following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Addendum and are
available for review in the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, Planning Division offices,
10500 Civic Center Drive:
City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027), certified
October 17, 2001
Victoria Arbors Village Master Plan EIR (SCH#98041137) certified on July 7, 1999;
and EIR Addendum approved on March 7, 2001.
Other documents have been referenced in the preparation of this Addendum and
are also available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division
offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by URS, report dated
July 30, 2003.
Phase I Habitat Assessment, prepared by URS, report dated July 30, 2003.
Protocol Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey, conducted by Richard Erickson and Leo
Simone of LSA, report dated January 6, 2003.
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
2001 GENERAL PLAN FINAL EIR
Page 4
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by MTGL, Inc., repor~ dated
August 20, 2002.
Location Map
IDRC2002~00839i
SuBTPM,16033 ]
Rt.
EXHIBIT "1" lid
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project Files: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002; Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616; Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839; and Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16033.
2. Project Descriptions: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002 - A request to amend
the General Plan Transportation Section of Chapter III to re-designate the portion of Day Creek
Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a secondary street to a collector street.
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00616 - A request to amend Chapter 17.30 of
the Development Code, Industrial Districts Subarea 8, to re-designate the portion of Day Creek
Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard from a 100-foot Special Boulevard to a modified local
collector street.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00839 - The review of the site plan and architectural
elevations for a proposed shopping center with a potential for up to 315,000 square feet, which
could include 183,500 square feet of in-line retail stores, eleven individual retail building pads
totaling 89,700 square feet, of which three are intended for restaurants (two of which may include
drive-through capability).
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT16033 - A request to subdivide the 60-acre property into 12
parcels and public right-of-way dedication.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858 - A request to establish a process for financing
the construction of Day Creek Boulevard within the Foothill Crossing Shopping Center, located on
the southwest and southeast corners of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards as provided for in
Section 65864 of the California Government Code for real property -^PN: 210-082-53 thru 57.
3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
O & S Holdings, LLC
11611 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90049
4. General Plan Designation: General Commercial
5. Zoning: Victoria Community Plan/Regional Related Office-Commercial
6. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
8. Other agencies whose approval Js required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement): No other responsible agencies are applicable.
///
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2.002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 2
GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report:
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
NOx - Nitrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
PM10 - Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model
112-
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This Initial Study has been prepared to review the environmental impacts resulting from changes to the
General Plan and the development associated herewith, er changes in circumstances surrounding the
proposed project. The analysis evaluates whether the impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan
Final EIR, and whether major revisions to that EIR'are required. The following provides a summary
analysis of potential impacts and consistency with the mitigation program set forth in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final EIR.
1. AESTHETICS.
The site is located generally at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway
and is characterized by a declining vineyard. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a
result of this project. Design review of the site plan, landscaping and building elevations is
required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new
utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility
enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by
said Resolution.
The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and
placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with
City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be
selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site.
The Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final EIR indicates that City will continue to urbanize
which will incrementally change the City's visual character. To reduce these impacts, the following
mitigations measures as recommended in the 2001 General Plan FEIR, are applicable to, and will
be implemented by, the proposed project:
AES-3 Continue to implement the City's comprehensive design guidelines for commercial
development.
AES-5 Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong landscaped edge,
provides a coherent high-quality appearance along a particular route and enhances the
image of the adjacent development.
AES-6 Continue to require the under-grounding of utility lines and facilities wherever feasible to
minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and electrical enclosures.
AES-9 Develop mixed use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive
integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and focused "sense of place"
that emanates from the architectural and landscape design.
Aesthetic impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
2, AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.
The site is generally located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway and is
characterized by a declining vineyard. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands,
Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of
which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan
Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and
eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further,
two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 4
their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in
the adopted General Plan Land Use Plan. The 2001 General Plan FEIR identified the conversion
of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of
overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is
consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated, and the
site itself is not identified as either Prime or Unique farmland, or farmland of Statewide Importance.
Agricultural impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
3. AIR QUALITY.
As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the
pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The 2001 General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a
significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was
ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan
for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
Construction Emissions. Based on the URBEMIS7G model estimates, as reflected in Table 5.6.4
of the General Plan, both the CO and the SOx levels are below the daily and quarterly SCAQMD
thresholds of significance (Table 1 below). Therefore, development as proposed by the land uses
in the adopted General Plan, would have a less than significant impact on air quality for CO and
SOx emissions. All other emissions may be significant on project-specific basis; and in
accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, any project that cannot be mitigated to less'than
significant is also significant on a cumulative basis. Therefore, NOx, ROG, and PMIo would all be
cumulatively significant. These unavoidable impacts were overridden by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in the findings adopted along with the certification of the 2001 General Plan FEIR.
Construction and operational emissions are considered by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) to be significant if they exceed the thresholds shown in Table 1,
In addition to the thresholds identified in the Table, an increase in carbon monoxide concentrations
in an area that already exceeds national or state CO standards is also considered significant if the
increase exceeds one parts per million (ppm) for a 1-hour average or 0.45 ppm for an 8-hour
average.
TABLE 1
EMISSION THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Construction Operations
Pollutant
pounds/day tons/quarter pounds/day
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 24,75 550
Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 150 6.75 150
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100 2.5 55
Particulate Matter (PM10) 150 6,75 150
Reactive Organic 75 2.5 55
Compounds (ROC)
Note: Toxic emissions are considered significant if they expose sensitive receptom to a cancer dsk of 1 in I million
or 10 in I rnillion if best available control technology for toxics (T-BACT) is employed.
Source: South Coast Air Quality Handbook
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 5
The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook estimates that each acre of disturbed soil creates 26.4
pounds/day of PM~o. On a worst-case basis of the entire 60-acre site undergoing grading in one
day, daily emissions were estimated to be 1,584 pounds of PM~o on a peak day, without the
consideration of any mitigation. Employee vehicles and equipment emissions would have also
resulted in carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, reactive organic compounds, and sulfur oxide
emissions. Construction-related emissions could be significant, however, these unavoidable
impacts were overridden by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the findings adopted along with the
certification of the 2001 General Plan FEIR.
The proposed commercial land uses within the project are consistent with the type of land uses
anticipated in the General Plan General Commercial Land Use designation. Therefore, the Air
Quality mitigation measures as set forth in the Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final EIR,
are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the proposed project:
Construction Depending on the level of construction conducted at any one time, NOx, ROG, PM~0
emissions could exceed daily or quarterly threshold levels and mitigation measures indicated in
the 2001 General Plan FEiR are warranted to reduce these emissions to the extent feasible.
AQ-1 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce
operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being
properly serviced and maintained as per the manufacturer's specifications. Maintenance
records shall be available at the construction site for City verification.
AQ-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit construction plans
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provided evidence that Iow emissions
mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found
to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff.
AQ-3 All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1113. Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-
pressure spray.
AQ-4 All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
AQ-5 Ail construction shall comply with the SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally
contractors shall include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended
periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and
after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use
sound engineering practices.
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or
occurs as a result of hauling.
//5
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 6
· Suspend grading operations during high winds in accordance with Rule 403
requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads
using turps or other suitable means.
Operations. The implementation of the land uses identified in the General Plan would result in
substantial daily emissions compared to existing conditions and would result in significant levels of
CO, NOx, ROG, SOx, and PM~o. The greatest source of emissions is vehicular traffic. To reduce
these impacts, the following mitigations measures as recommended in the 2001 General Plan
FEIR, are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the proposed project:
AQ-6 All "large-scele" project applications shall provide incentives to use mass transit including
the placement of bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares if not so equipped.
AQ-7 All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bikeANalking path between these
bus shelters and the proposed commercial uses. These paths shall be lit and configured
so as to avoid potential conflict with roadways and railroad activities.
AQ-8 All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for
prolonged periods (i.e. in excess of 10 minutes).
AQ-9 The City shall require that commercial uses designate preferential parking for vanpools.
AQ-10 The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate food service.
AQ-11 All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus
and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas.
AQ-12 All commercial site tenants with more than 50 employees shall be requested to configure
their operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule to the extent reasonably
feasible.
AQ-13 All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting
heating, air-conditioning, appliances and water heaters.
AQ-14 All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and
weather-stripping.
Air Quality impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final Ell:{, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
4, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
The site is approximately 60-acres generally located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and the 1-15 freeway. The site is that of a declining vineyard and is bordered on the north by
Foothill Boulevard, to the east by a drainage channel and the freeway, and the south by Arrow
Highway, and to the south by a flood control channel. The elevation of the site is between
1160and 1200 feet above mean sea level, with a decreasing local topographic gradient of
approximately 80 feet per mile to the south.
The old vineyard dominates vegetation on the site; however, approximately 13-acres of Coastal
Sage Scrub is supported on the site along with patches of weeds within the most disturbed
portions of the site. No sensitive plant species were detected during the Habitat Assessment
conducted on July 15, 2002.
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 7
The on-site vegetation supports a variety of insects, birds, reptiles, and mammals (including
abundant rodent activity). Live trapping of the rodent population was conducted in order to
determine the presence or absence of the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat. The results
of the protocol survey, conducted for five nights in November 2002, were negative (no sensitive
wildlife species were detected). The most common rodents found during the trapping sequence
included Pacific Kangaroo rat and deer mouse.
Given the setting ahd the negative results of the Habitat Assessment, and subsequent Trapping
Survey, the proposed project will result in less than significant impact upon biological resources.
There were no mitigation measures identified in the 2001 General Plan FEIR, which would be
pertinent to the project.
Biological impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). In addition, although there are
no known amheological sites or resoumes recorded on the project site; the Rancho Cucamonga
area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the 2001 General Plan
FEI R (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction,
could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources.
The 2001 General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an
alluvial fan. According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or
resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; however, the area has a
high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been
deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late
Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of
modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by
Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2.
The Rancho Cucamonga 200'1 General Plan Final EIR indicates that the area within the City is
known to contain archaeological and historical resources, with a potential to yield significant
paleontological resources. To reduce these impacts, the following mitigations measures as
recommended in the 2001 General Plan FEIR, are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the
proposed project:
CR-1 It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to
construction activities in any part of the City:
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for
prehistoric resources, a field survey for prehistoric resources within portions of the
project area not previously surveyed for cultural resources.
CR-2 If any prehistoric archaeological rasoumes are encountered before or during grading, the
developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.
CR-3 It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to
construction activities in part of the City:
//?
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 8
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic
resources, a field survey for historical resources within portions of the project area no
previously surveyed for historic resources shall be conducted.
CR-4 If any historical resoumes are encountered before or during grading, the developer will
retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate
measures to protect or preserve them for study.
CR-5 It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist conduct a pre-construction field survey of
any project site within the City that is underlain by Quaternary alluvium. The
paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific
recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e. monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
Impacts to Cultural Resources were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final Ell=,, and based on
the foregoing, no major revisions to that Eli=, are required.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.
No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the
Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan
Exhibit V-l, and Section 5.1 of the 2001 General Plan FEiR. The Red Hill Fault passes within 2.5
miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north. These
faults are both capable of producing M~, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of
producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas,
capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can
produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic
impacts are less than significant.
The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits.
These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types onsite consist of Tujunga
Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and 2001 General Plan FEIR
Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are excessively drained and moderately sloping formed on alluvial fans
from granitic alluvium. These soils are rapidly permeable and risk of erosion is slight because of
the gravelly surface.
To reduce these impacts, the following mitigations measures as recommended in the 2001
General Plan FEIR, are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the proposed project:
SG-17 The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety practices into City
codes and project review process.
SG-21 The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to comply with City
provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive generation of dust where the
property is vulnerable to these conditions.
impacts to Geology and Soils were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on
the foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS.
The project will not involve the transport or disposal of hazardous materials, nor the use of
hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition
that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any
other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 9
Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State,
and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste
will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant.
The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site
inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous
materials (Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, July 30, 2002). In addition, the City's Multi-
Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be
administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the
project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all
applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
To reduce these impacts, the following mitigations measures as recommended in the 2001
General Plan FEIR, are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the proposed project::
HMC-1 The City shall continue to support the County of San Bemardino's management of the
Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program to identify and regulate businesses handling
extremely hazardous materials, or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
HMC-3 The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program to address storm water runoff, pollution
prevention, and illegal discharge of waste into storm drains in the community.
Impacts associated with Hazards and Waste Materials were considered in the 2001 General Plan
Final EIR, and based on the foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
According to Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), the water purveyor for the area within
the City, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga
and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year
2030. The proposed project alone will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with
recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground
according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the
site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to
470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the 2001 General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9),
continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however,
CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities.
Development of the proposed proJect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff
will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows.
The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A grading
and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of
grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site.
Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in
the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in
surface water quality impacts. The site is more than 5 acres; therefore, is required to comply with
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution.
The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan
Exhibit V-5; in fact the Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain
system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 10
provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system
includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined
channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. No adverse
impacts to this system are expected.
There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and
tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern
San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-
made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-
significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of
the City, and spreading grounds both within and nodh of the City.
To reduce these impacts, the following mitigations measures as recommended in the 2001
General Plan FEIR, are applicable to, and will be implemented by, the proposed project:
Surface Water. Increased surface water runoff will occur due to new development that is
consiste, nt with the proposed land uses identified in the General Plan. The increased development
will potentially affect a variety of users and facilities, including downstream water users, storm
drain facilities, and groundwater basins. To adequately provided for surface water runoff the City
of Rancho Cucamonga will undertake the following measures which would be pertinent to the
proposed project:
HD-1 Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate development impact
fees paid to ensure adequate facilities will exist to meet the surface water runoff generated
by new development.
Water Quality. The increased development occurring consistent with the General Plan will
potentially affect water quality. To adequately protect surface and groundwater quality, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will undertake the following measures, which would be pertinent to the
proposed project:
HD-5 During the construction and operation of new development, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will require the implementation of best management practices to minimize
pollutant runoff. This will include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan to control runoff from the site.
HD-8 During the construction and operation of new development, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will implement best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff and
percolation into the groundwater basin. This will include the preparation of a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan to control runoff from the site.
Hydrologic impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING,
The proposed project has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial; the site
is the southern most component of the Victoria Community Plan, with a zoning designation of
Regional Related Office/Commercial. The proposed project has been designed in conformance
with the development standards and land uses as permitted by the Community Plan; and land use
as identified by the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable mitigation measures
set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 Genera/Plan Final EIR. Land Use impacts were
considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the foregoing, no major revisions to
that EIR are required.
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 11
10. MINERAL RESOURCES.
The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, nor a valuable mineral resource
recovery site, according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-I. Therefore, the
proposed project would present no impacts to the aggregate resources.
Impacts to Mineral Resoumes were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on
the foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
11. NOISE
The project site is within an area where noise levels are expected to exceed City standards at
buildout, according to General Plan Exhibit V-13. The 2001 General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7)
indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction
vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise, which may exceed City standards, as
identified on Table 2 (Table V-3, Land Use Noise Standards of the General Plan), noise standards
for land use types. The proposed project is required to comply with the requirements set forth for
commercial/office land uses.
TABLE 2
LAND USE NOISE STANDARDS
Land Use Interior Standards Exterior Standards
Residential
10 pm to 7 am 40 dBA 45 dBA
7 am to 10 pm 55 dBA 60 dBA
Commercial/Office
10 pm to 7 am None identified 60 dBA
7 am to 10 pm None identified 65 dBA
Industrial
Class A (Industrial Park) 60 Ldn 65 Ldn
Class B (General Industrial) 65 Ldn 75 Ldn
Class C (Heavy Industrial) 65 Ldn 85 Ldn
The General Plan identifies existing and future (year 2020) exterior noise levels along major
roadways in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Tables V-4 Existing Exterior Noise Exposure and V-
6 Future Exterior Noise Exposure in Year 2020 of the City General Plan). The information
summarized in Table 3 is applicable to the proposed project, including any areas proposed for
outdoor dining.
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 12
TABLE 3
EXTERIOR NOISE EXPOSURE
EXISTING (2000) FUTURE (2020)
ROADWAY Distance to Contours (feet) Distance to Contours (feet)
65 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
Foothill Boulevard: 315 680 429 923
Milliken Avenue to 1-15.
I-15 Freeway: 1,077 2,320 1,991 4,288
4~ Street to Foothill Boulevard
The proposed commercial development would not constitute a sensitive receptor as defined in the
General Plan, however, the proposed project will be subject to compliance with the requirements
as noted in Table 2 above - Land Use Noise Standards. Given the fact that the project does not
constitute a sensitive receptor, nor is the project adjacent to or in proximity of sensitive receptors,
the mitigation measures set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Final EIR are
not pertinent to the proposed project.
Noise impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the foregoing,
no major revisions to that EIR are required.
12, POPULATION AND HOUSING.
Implementation of the land uses as identified in the adopted General Plan, as well as future
development in the surrounding areas, would result in continued changes to the socioeconomic
character of the community. Development within the parameters of the adopted General Plan
would result in approximately one to three percent increases in future projections for population,
employment, and housing. Such increases were not considered significant in the final analysis of
the General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the land use designation anticipated in
the General Plan, therefore, no further impacts to population and housing are anticipated.
Population and Housing impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based
on the foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Fire Protection. The site is generally located near the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and
the 1-15 Freeway. The proposed project would likely be served by one of two of the nearest Fire
Stations, either Station 173 (located approximately 1 mile north near Base Line and Day Creek
Boulevard) or Station 174 (located approximately 2 miles southwest of the site near Milliken
Avenue and Jersey Boulevard). Future growth under the adopted General Plan will incrementally
include incremental introduction of new structures, and therefore an increased risk of fire hazards.
In addition, future growth will also include the construction of additional arterial and collector
streets that will provide improved access within the City, allowing fire and emergency vehicles
greater overall access throughout the City. Implementation of the following mitigation measures
from the 2001 General Plan FEIR, which are pertinent to the proposed project, will result in a less
than significant impact on Fire Protection services as applied to the proposed project.
FS-8 On a proJect-specific level, the following mitigation shall be used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the construction of new fire stations
and provisions of Fire Department personnel to serve their project prior to issuance of
/22-
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 13
building permits. Development impact fees shall be evaluated as necessary to ensure
adequate funds are collected to meet established service levels.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to the Fire District for
review and approval to assure that service to their site is in accordance with Rancho
Cucamonga Fire District requirements prior to approval of grading plans.
· Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with City approved building
plans prior to commencement of structural framing.
· Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District the on-site water supply system
is designed to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage in accordance with City
Fire District requirements prior to the approval of street improvement plans.
· Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install automatic sprinkler
systems.
Police Protection. Future growth under the adopted General Plan within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will incrementally increase population and substantially contribute to a cumulative
impact on Police services; however, implementation of the following mitigation measures from the
2001 General Plan FEIR, which are pertinent to the proposed project, will result in a less than
significant impact on Police services as applied to the proposed project.
P--4 The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning (CPTED - Crime Prevention
through Environmental Design) as an effective means of preventing crime. Developers
should design structures, access systems, open space, parking lots, paths, ply areas, and
other public spaces to contribute to an overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability to
crime opportunity.
P-5 The City shall promote the design of developments that provide maximum visibility
approaches to, from, and within the property by vehicles and particularly by pedestrians.
P-6 Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that the crime prevention
features originally designed into the project remain operational.
.Schools. Five school districts cover the K-12 educational needs within the City. The site is
situated with the Cucamonga School District for grades K-8 and the Chaffey Joint Union High
School District for grades 9-12. The Cucamonga school District has no plans for construction of
new facilities with the District, and at the time of preparation of the 2001 General Plan FEIR, the
· District indicated that it had capacity for additional students within District boundaries.
Implementation of the following mitigation measures from the 2001 General Plan FEIR, which are
pertinent to he proposed project, will result in a less than significant impact on Schools.
S-1 The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of appropriate school
fees prior to issuance of building permits.
Library Services. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will incrementally increase
demand for librery services. According to the 2001 General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the
projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand.
The 2001 Generel Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted
by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR
was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has
planned a new librery within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately
22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2.002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 14
the City. No mitigation measures in the 2001 General Plan FEIR are applicable to the proposed
project.
Impacts to Public Services were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
14. RECREATION,
Parks and Recreation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department
provides Park and recreation opportunities and services. The nearest park sites will be located in
the Victoria Community Plan - Arbors Village, located north of the project site. The project will not
require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a
decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard
condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No mitigation
measures in the 2001 General Plan FEIR are applicable to the proposed project.
Recreation impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.
The Circulation Plan (Exhibit 111-4) of the City General Plan identifies the segment of Day Creek
Boulevard that is south of Foothill Boulevard as a 'Secondary' Arterial, which is typically of 4-lane
roadway with a right-of-way of 88-feet. The applicant for the proposed project has proposed that
this segment of Day Creek Boulevard be modified to a 'Collector' street, which is typically a 2-lane
roadway with a 66-foot right-of-way.
Table 4 identifies the trip generation rates, and the resulting trip generation, for the proposed
project. Based on these trip generation estimates (Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by LSA
Associates, January 14, 2003), the proposed project would generate 11,704 new daily trips, with
975 p.m. peak hour trips.
TABLE 4 - PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
A.M. Peak Hour P.M, Peak Hour
IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Daily
Trips/SF~ 0.62 0.39 1.01 2.04 2.21 2.25 45.26
Project Trip Generation 193 124 317 643 696 1,339 14,256
Pass-by Trips2 (27.9%) 54 35 88 179 194 374 2,552
Net New Trips 139. 89 229 464 502 965 11,704
Trip rates developed from algorithms in the ITE Tdp Generation Handbook (6th Edition), Land Use 820 - Shopping
Center.
2
Pass-by percentage for a.m. and p.m. peak hours based on data for Land Use 820 - Shopping Centers in the ITE Tdp
Generation Handbook. Daily pass-by 10% less than peak hour.
The land uses within the proposed project are consistent with that of the General Plan land use
designation of General Commercial. The General Plan Circulation Element identifies existing
roadways along with the corresponding Master Plan Classifications:
North/South Arterials - "Day Creek Boulevard is a proposed roadway that will extend from
Highland Avenue to Foothill Boulevard. This roadway will be completed as adjacent development
occurs."
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 15
EastNVest Arterials - "Foothill Boulevard is classified as a major divided arterial in the City and
currently carries approximately 23,800 to 38,000 vehicles per day."
The TIA prepared for the project to address the proposed General Plan Amendment summarized
intersection improvements that have been recommended in order to maintain the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's level of service standards (Table 5). (For 2025 improvements, the total cost of each
improvement is indicated, followed by the project's fair share contribution in parenthesis).
TABLE 5
Intersection Improvements Required to Maintain
City of Rancho Cucamonga LOS Standards
PROJECT-RELATED
SCENARIO IMPROVEMENTS
(or fair share cost contribution)
2004 with Project Rochester Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -
Existing F and existing delay not exceeded;
no mitigation required.
2025 with Project Rochester Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -
Existing F and existing delay not exceeded;
no mitigation required.
Day Creek Bird/Base Line Road -
Addition of a dedicated eastbound right turn lane,
with right tum overlap phasing. ($6,909)
Da,/ Creek BIvd/Foothill Bird - Addition
of fourth eastbound through lane along project
frontage. ($13,998)
1-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Blvd -
Addition of a third eastbound through lane and a
free eastbound right t~m lane. ($30,898)
The proposed project would be consistent with the applicable mitigation measures set forth in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and as applied to the proposed project,
as follows:
TC-1 Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed development
projects in accordance with the San Bernardino Cpngestion Management Plan (CMP)
criteria for requiring a traffic study (where project traffic is forecasted to generate a
minimum 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for
retail land uses).
TC-2 Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D or worse, as identified in the traffic
study, shall require analysis for both interim and future conditions. These priority
intersections shall be identified in the traffic studies prepared for proposed development
which contribute 80 or more two-way peak hour trips to ensure that they are operating
adequately.
TC-3 Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's discretion, site-specific
access studies to determine the feasibility of proposed access locations.
TC-4 The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is reserved at critical intersections to
implement the approach lane geometrics necessary to provide the levels of service, as
noted within the traffic study.
EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 16
TC-6 The City shall adopt recommended changes to the General Plan Circulation roadway
classifications, as noted within the traffic study, in order to accommodate projected traffic
increases and to insure that improvements specified are implemented.
TC-8 Additional improvements will be required beyond that necessary for typical roadway
standards, as defined in the proposed General Plan, for the intersections listed below to
ensure that intersections operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better.
Intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM)
· 1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B, B)
· 1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C, C)
No new mitigation is required because the amount of traffic generated by the proposed land uses
is consistent with the amount of traffic that was expected to be generated by the approved land
uses in the General Plan; and all improvements that are necessary to meet the General Plan Level
of Service have been incorporated as part of the proposed project.
Transportation impacts were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and based on the
foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Water. The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system, which is
provided through canyon (i.e. surface) water (12%), ground water (43%), and imported water
(45%). Commercial and industrial water usage is approximately 14 to 16 percent of total water
use within the District. CCWD has adopted a Water Management Plan that has estimated demand
needs until 2030. CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and
operation of water facilities within its District boundaries. The current Master Plan envisions the
continued ability of the District to supply water for planned uses, however, prudent demands and
continued attention to a water conservation, demand and reduction strategies are critical. The
following mitigation measures in the 2002 General Plan FEIR are applicable to, and will be
implemented by, the proposed project:
W-2 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated into the design of
the development where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and
to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks,
terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
W-6 The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect ground water
recharge areas form construction and other potential pollutant runoff.
Wastewater. The Inland Empire Utilities Agency operates four wastewater treatment facilities that
serve the cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Ontario, Upland, Montclair, Chino, Chino Hills,
and a portion of the Chino Hills Dairy Preserve. Two of the existing plants currently serve
development in the City of Rancho Cucamenga (Regional plants 1 and 4). Wastewater is
conveyed to the Regional treatment plant through pipelines managed by the Cucamonga County
Water District. Future expansion of the wastewater treatment and conveyance system is entirely
dependent on growth and demand. The Agency and the District have established funding
mechanisms to ensure continued operation and expansion of wastewater facilities within its
service area. Therefore, as development occurs throughout the Agency and the District service
area, additional funds will be available to construct the necessary facilities.
~ EIR Addendum for Foothill Crossing City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA2002-00002; DRC2003-00616; DRC2002-00839; and SUBTPM16033 Page 17
Stormwater. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been
designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building
Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered
significant.
.Solid Waste. Solid waste disposal is currently provided by two City private contractors who
disposes the refuse at permitted landfills. Future growth under the land uses identified in the
adopted General Plan and as analyzed in the 2001 General Plan FEIR, will increase the
generation of solid waste and substantially contribute to the cumulative impact on existing solid
waste facilities. The implementation of the following mitigation measures, which are pertinent to
the proposed project, will result is a less than significant impact to solid waste collection and
disposal:
SW-1 The City shall continue to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB939.
Impacts to Utilities and Service Systems were considered in the 2001 General Plan Final EIR, and
based on the foregoing, no major revisions to that EIR are required.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing and on the project features identified by the applicant as set forth in
Appendix A:
1) No substantial changes are proposed in the General Plan because the changes to
the circulation element are minor and do not require major revisions to the Final
General Plan EIR. Further, no new or substantially increased impacts will result from
the general plan amendment or construction and implementation of the related
commercial development project.
2) No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken because the project is consistent with the land use
designation set forth in the general plan. The Final General Plan EIR analyzed the
commercial land use designation for the project site, and no new significant effects
of increase in severity of previously identified impacts will occur because of the
amendment to the circulation element or any other aspect of the related commercial
development project. The impacts identified in the Final General Plan EIR, some of
which were deemed significant and unmitigable, remain the same with the
implementation of this project, and although these impaq:ts remain the same as
previously identified, a project specific statement of overriding considerations is
necessary for the commercial development project. See Communities for a Better
Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 CaI.App.4th 98.
3) No new information of substantial importance, which was not previously known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
2001 General Plan Final EIR was certified as complete shows any of the conditions
set forth in CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3) that would require preparation of a
supplemental or subsequent EIR.
4) Minor technical changes or additions to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR are
necessary to make that environmental document adequate for the proposed project,
and thereby allow the City to rely on that document in meeting its obligations under
CEQA.
/27
EXHIBIT 1 - INITIAL STUDY PART II FOR:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment DRC2003-
00616, Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839, and Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16033.
The following provides a response to the summary analysis of potential impacts and
reinforces the project's consistency with the mitigation program set forth in the City of
Rancho Cucamon.qa 2001 General Plan Final EIR. The applicant's statements and
responses are made in italics text to differentiate them from the mitigation measures
they address.
1. AESTHETICS.
The project will not have a significant impact on Aesthetics because it contains the
following project features:
AES-3 Continue to implement the City's comprehensive design guidelines for
commercial development. The project will satisfy this guideline by being
designed using and in compliance with the Development Code, Victoria
Arbors Specific Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and the Foothill
Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. We have reviewed our design with
the City's Design Review Committee and they have commented that our
project's design is excellent and in keeping with the City's intent to foster
excellent design.
AES-5 Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong
landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance along a
particular route and enhances the image of the adjacent development.
The project will satisfy this guideline by being designed using and in
compliance with the Development Code, Victoria Arbors Specific Plan,
Victoria Community Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement
Plan street frontage enhancement standards that require landscape
setbacks, public art, pedestrian walkways, etc.
AES~6 Continue to require the under-grounding of utility lines and facilities
wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead
utility lines and electrical enclosures. This direction has been provided to
the utility companies and site engineers and afl utility lines and facilities
will be undergrounded where feasible.
AES-9 Develop mixed use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there
is sensitive integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation,
and focused "sense of place" that emanates from the architectural and
landscape design. The project will satisfy the sense of place requirement
via architectural homage to Route 66 that is incorporated in the
architecture and site design of Foothill Crossing.
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.
The project will not have a significant impact on Agricultural Resources because
the proposed use is in compliance with the land use element of the General Plan.
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 2
3. AIR QUALITY.
The project will not have a significant impact on Air Quality because it contains the
following project features:
Construction:
AQ-1 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition
so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per
the manufacturer's specifications. Maintenance records shall be available
at the construction site for City verification. This requirement is being
incorporated into the project by specification in the final construction
documents for all portions of the project.
AQ-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit
construction plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the
proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors
shall provided evidence that Iow emissions mobile construction equipment
will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible
for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff. This
requirement is being incorporated into the project by specification in the
final construction documents for all portions of the project.
AQ-3 All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pedormance standards noted
in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand
or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. This requirement is being incorporated
into the project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of the project.
AQ-4 All asphalt shall meet or exceed pedormance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1108. This requirement is being incorporated into the project by
specification in the final construction documents for all portions of the
project.
AQ-5 All construction shall comply with the SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
Additionally contractors shall include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion
over extended periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil
during and after the end of work periods.
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 3
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices,
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to adjacent public
thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds in accordance with Rule
403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or
cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
This requirement is being incorporated into the project by specilication in the §nal
construction documents for all portions of the project.
Operations:
AQ-6 All "large-scale" project applications shall provide incentives to use mass
transit including the placement of bus stop shelters along major
thoroughfares if not so equipped. The project will satisfy this mitigation
measure via placement of a bus shelter on Foothill Boulevard at the
entrance of the project.
AQ-7 Ail "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bike/walking path
between these bus shelters and . . . the proposed commercial uses.
These paths shall be Fit and configured so as to avoid potential conflict
with roadways and railroad activities. The project will satisfy this measure
through the site and landscape design for the project incorporating
bike/walking paths that are configured to avoid potential conflict with
roadway activities.
AQ-8 All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be
left idling for prolonged periods (i.e. in excess of 10 minutes). The project
will satisfy this measure via signage that will be placed throughout the site
and at loading areas for the project.
AQ-9 The City shall require that commercial uses designate preferential parking
for vanpools. The project will satisfy this measure through signage and
the parking plan for the project.
AQ-10 The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate food service. The
project will satisfy this measure via our leasing effort. We have proposed
three restaurant pad buildings at the site and will design the pad buildings
with enough flexibility to accommodate future food service users.
AQ-11 All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required
to post both bus and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas. The
project will satisfy this measure as a requirement in all Lease agreements
executed with tenants who may have 50 or more employees.
EXHIBIT I FOR:
G PA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 4
AQ-12 All commemial site tenants or more than 50 employees shall be
requested to configure their operating schedules around the MetroLink
schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. The project will satisfy this
measure as a requirement in all Lease agreements executed with tenants
who may have 50 or more emp/oyeas.
AQ-13 AII commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high
efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air-conditioning, appliances and water
heaters. This requirement is being incorporated into the project by
specification in the final construction documents for all portions of the
project.
AQ-14 All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane
windows and weather-stripping. This requirement is being incorporated
into the project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of the project
4, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES,
The project will not have a significant impact on Biological Resources because it
contains the following project features: The results of the Habitat Assessment and
subsequent Trapping Survey were negative and no mitigation measures have been
identified that would be pertinent to the project.
$. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
The project will not have a significant impact on Cultural Resources because it
contains the following project features:
CR-1 It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following
tasks prior to construction activities in any part of the City.
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the
potential for prehistoric resoumes, a field survey for prehistoric
resources within portions of the project area not previously surveyed for
cultural resources. This recommendation is being incorporated into the
project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of the project.
CR-2 If any prehistoric archaeological resources ara encountered before or
during grading, the developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to
monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect
or preserve them for study. This requirement is being incorporated into
the project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of the project in the event any prehistoric archaeological
resources are encountered.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.
The project will not have a significant impact on Geology and Soils because it
contains the following project features:
/Z/
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 5
SG-17 The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety
practices into City codes and project review process. This requirement is
being incorporated into the project by specification in the final
construction documents for all portions of the project and the employment
of qualified design professionals who are capable of executing this
requirement.
SG-21 The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to
comply with City provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive
generation of dust where the property is vulnerable to these conditions.
This requirement is being incorporated into the project by specification in
the final construction documents for all portions of the project and the
preparation of a project SWPPP and other programs as necessary to
comply with City provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive
generation of dust.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS.
The project will not have a significant impact on Hazards and Waste Materials
because it contains the following project features:
HMC-1 The City shall continue to support the County of San Bernardino's
management of the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program to identify
and regulate businesses handling extremely hazardous materials, or
hazardous materials within regulated quantities. This requirement is
being incorporated into the project by specification in the final
construction documents for all portions of the project.
HMC-2 The City shall continue to maintain and implement the Household
Hazardous Waste Element, in accordance with State Law, to provide
handling and emergency response services for household hazardous
waste. This requirement is being incorporated into the project by
specification in the final construction documents for all portions of the
project.
HMC-3 The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to address
storm water runoff, pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of waste
into storm drains in the community. This requirement is being
incorporated into the project by specification in the final construction
documents for all portions of the project and the preparation of a project
SWPPP
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
The project will not have a significant impact on Hydrology and Water Quality
because it contains the following project features:
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 6
Surface Water:
HD-1 Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate
development impact fees paid to ensure adequate facilities will exist to
meet the surface water runoff generated by new development. The project
will satisfy this requirement by developer participating in an area wide
Community Facilities District that will implement major flood control
facilities provided in the Flood Control Master Plan so no development
impact fees will be applicable.
HD-2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to upgrade its drainage
system in conjunction with plans and funds provided by the County of San
Bernardino Flood Control District to provide necessary flood control
improvements. The necessary flood control improvements are based on
the City's adopted Flood Control Master Plan. The project will incorporate
on-site and within the adjacent public rights-of-way all necessary and
appropriate improvements to connect with major flood control facilities
provided throughout the Flood Control Master Plan.
Water Quality:
HD-5 During the construction and operation of new development the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will require the implementation of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include the preparation of a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to control runoff from the site. This
requirement is being incorporated into the project by specification in the
final construction documents for all portions of the project and the
preparation of a project SWPPP.
HD-8 During the construction and operation of new development the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will implement best management practices to
minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater basin. This
will include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to
control runoff from the site. This requirement is being incorporated into the
project by specification in the final construction documents for all portions
of the project and the preparation of a project SWPPP.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
The project will not have a significant impact on Land Use and Planning because it
contains the following project features:
LU-1 Accommodate new development in a manner that enables the City's
residents and businesses to readily be integrated into the social and
physical structure of the City. The project will satisfy this guideline by
being designed using and in compliance with the Development Code,
Victoria Arbors Specific Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and the Foothill
Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan street frontage enhancement
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 7
standards that require landscape setbacks, public a~t, pedestrian
walkways, etc.
LU-2 Promote development that is sustainable in its use of land in relation to the
impact upon natural resources, energy, air, and water quality. The project
will satisfy this guideline through design that is sustainable in its use of
land in relation to the impact upon natural resources, energy, air, and
water quality.
LU-3 Promote opportunities to develop mixed use areas and projects in carefully
selected areas. The project will satisfy this guideline by being designed
using and in compliance with the Development Code, Victoria Arbors
Specific Plan and Victoria Community Plan and will be a component in the
mixed-use nature in this area of the City.
LU-4 Restrict strip commercial development in favor of more focused
commercial or mixed-use centers. The project will satisfy this guideline by
being designed as a focused commercial center with a cohesive design.
LU-5 Restrict the intensi.ty of commercial concentrations at intersections, other
than town center and regional center locations, to two corners.. The
project will satisfy this guideline by being designed as a required at an
intersection (Day Creek Boulevard) on two comers (the Southwest and
Southeast).
LU-7 Development densities and intensities shall be implemented within the
ranges specified in the General Plan: neither higher no lower than the
limits of the range. The project will satisfy this guideline by being designed
within the ranges of densities and intensities specified in the General Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES.
The project will not have a significant impact on Mineral Resources because it
contains the following project features: The project is not located in an area
identified in the General Plan as having any mineral resources.
11. NOISE,
The project will not have a significant impact on Noise because it contains the
following project features: The proposed commercial development would not
constitute a sensitive receptor as defined in the General Plan, nor is their any know
sensitive receptors in the immediate area than would be negatively affected by the
shopping center operations.
12, POPULATION AND HOUSING,
The project will not have a significant impact on Population and Housing because it
contains the following project features:
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 8
· The proposed project is consistent with the land use designation
anticipated in the General Plan; therefore, no further impacts to
population and housing are anticipated.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES.
The project will not have a significant impact on Public Services because it
contains the following project features:
Fire Protection. FS-8: On a project-specific level, the following mitigation shall be
used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the construction of
new fire stations and provisions of fire department personnel to serve
their project prior to issuance of building permits. Development impact
fees shall be evaluated as necessary to ensure adequate funds are
collected to meet established service levels. The project will satisfy this
requirement by appropriate Fire Protect District Fees as outlined and
communicated to the developer.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to the Fire
District for review and approval to assure that service to their site is in
accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District requirements prior to
approval of grading plans. This requirement is being incorporated into
the project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of Foothill Crossing. The project was technically reviewed by
the Fire Department and found to have adequate access.
· Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with City
approved building plans prior to commencement of structural framing.
This requirement is being incorporated into the project by specification
in the final construction documents for all portions of Foothill Crossing.
· Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District the on-site water
supply system is designed to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and
storage in accordance with City Fire District requirements prior to the
approval of street impr(~vement plans. This requirement is being
incorporated into the project by specification in the final construction
documents for all portions of Foothill Crossing.
· Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install
automatic sprinkler systems. This requirement is being incorporated into
the project by specification in the final construction documents for all
portions of Foothill Crossing.
Police Protection:
P-4 The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning (CPTED -
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) as an effective means of
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2.002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 9
preventing crime. Developers should design structures, access systems,
open space, parking lots, paths, play areas, and other public spaces to
contribute to an overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability to crime
opportunity. The project will satisfy this requirement by ensuring the design
of structures, access systems, open space, parking lots, paths, play areas,
and other public spaces to contribute to an overall sense of secudty and
lack of vulnerability to crime opportunity.
P-5 The City shall promote the design of developments that provide maximum
visibility approaches to, from, and within the property by vehicles and
particularly by pedestrians. The project will satisfy this requirement by
ensuring the design of Foothill Crossing provides maximum visibility
approaches to, from, and within the property by vehicles and particularly
by pedestrians.
P-6 Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that the
crime prevention features originally designed into the project remain
operational. The project will satisfy this requirement by preparing and
executing an Operations and Easement Agreement by and between all
parcels in the project ensuring the ongoing management and maintenance
of the crime prevention features originally designed into Foothill Crossing
will remain operational.
Schools:
S-1 The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of
appropriate school fees prior to issuance of building permits. The project
will satisfy this requirement by paying appropriate school fees as outlined
and communicated to the developer.
Library Services:
No mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed project.
14. RECREATION.
The project will not have a significant impact on Recreation because it contains the
following project features:
Parks and Recreation:
No mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed project.
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.
The project will not have a significant impact on Transportation/Traffic because it
contains the following project features:
TC-1 Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed
development projects in accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
G PA2002-O0002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 10
Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic study (where
project traffic is forecasted to generate a minimum 250 two-way peak
hour trips for non-retail land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail land
uses). The project has satisfied this requirement by having the
appropriate Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by a qualified
consultant and has the report has been accepted by the City.
TC-2 Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D or worse, as
identified in the traffic study, shall require analysis for both interim and
future conditions. These priority intersections shall be identified in the
traffic studies prepared for proposed development, which contribute 80 or
more two-way peak hour trips to ensure that they are operating
adequately. The project has satisfied this requirement by having the
appropriate Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by a qualified
consultant and has the report has been accepted by the City.
TC-3 Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's discretion,
site-specific access studies to determine the feasibility of proposed
access locations. The project has satisfied this requirement by having the
appropriate Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by a qualified
consultant and has the report has been accepted by the City.
TC-4 The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is reserved at critical
intersections to implement the approach lane geometrics necessary to
provide the levels of service, as noted within the traffic study. The project
has satisfied this requirement by having the appropriate Traffic Impact
Analysis Report prepared by a qualified consultant and has the report has
been accepted by the City. In addition the project's developer will deed in
excess of 6.6 acres to the City for rights of way related and adjacent to
the project
TC-6 The City shall adopt recommended changes to the General Plan
Circulation roadway classifications, as noted within the traffic study, in
order to accommodate projected traffic increases and to insure that
improvements specified are implemented. This requirement is being
incorporated into the project through the General Plan Amendment and
Development Code Amendment that are being processed for approval by
the applicant.
TC-8 Additional improvements will be required beyond that necessary for
typical roadway standards, as defined in the proposed General Plan, for
the intersections listed below to ensure that intersections operate at a
Level of Service (LOS) of D or better.
Intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM)
· 1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B,B)
· 1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C,C)
The project will satisfy this requirement.
EXHIBIT 1 FOR:
GPA2002-00002, DRC2003-00616, DRC2002-00839, AND SUBTPM16033
Page 11
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
The project will not have a significant impact on Utilities and Service Systems
because it contains the following project features:
Water:
W-2 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated
into the design of the development where appropriate. Measures that may
be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains,
pre-cast concrete lattice, blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff
spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. The project will.satisfy this
requirement by ensuring the site design of Foothill Crossing will provide
structures to retain precipitation and run-off on-site. Measures that may be
used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains,
pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff
spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
W-6 The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal and private projects
to protect ground water recharge areas from construction and other
potential pollutant runoff. This requirement is being incorporated into the
project through working with the appropriate City agencies to ensure the
correct specifications and design are included in the final construction
documents for all portions of the project and the preparation of a project
SWPPP.
Wastewater: No mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed project.
Stormwater: No mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed project.
Solid Waste:
SW-1 The City shall continue to implement waste reduction procedures
consistent with AB939. The project will satisfy this [equirement by
implementation of waste reduction procedures consistent with AB939.
~ H E C I T ¥ 0 F
~ANC[O CUCAMONGA
DATE: September 24, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16033 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to subdivide 60 acres of
land into 15 parcels and pubic right-of-way dedication as part of a proposed
shopping center on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commercial district
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related Files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858 (Continued
from September 10, 2003)
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - The review of the site plan
and architectural elevations for a proposed shopping center of up to 315,000
square feet, including in-line retail stores, and individual retail pad buildings, on
45.5 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commercial district
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63 and 64. Related Files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858 (Continued
from September 10, 2003)
BACKGROUND: The subject applications were continued from the previous meeting at the
request of the applicant. This request was in order to work on modifications to the
accompanying Development Agreement and to address procedural issues regarding the
conditions of approval of the Conditional Use Permit and parcel map.
The changes have been made and the applications with recommended conditions are ready for
Commission review and action. Refer to the staff report of September 10, 2003, and the
Resolutions accompanying this report for the discussion of issues and conditions of approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
September 24, 2003
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of General
Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002 and Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00616, and
concurs with the recommendations of the Design Review Committee it would be appropriate to
recommend approval of the Tentative Pamel Map and Conditional Use Permit to the City
Council.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:AW:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report, September 10, 2003
Revised Resolution Recommending Approval for SUBTPM16033
Revised Resolution Recommending Approval for DRC2002-00839
/¢0
THE CITY OF
~ANCIIO CUCAFIONGA
Staff Report
DATE: September 10, 2003
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16033 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to subdivide 60 acres of
land into 12 pamels and pubic right-of-way dedication as part of a proposed
shopping center on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commercial district
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related Files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858 (Continued
from August 27, 2003)
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC - The review of the site plan
and architectural elevations for a proposed shopping center of up to 315,000
square feet, including in-line retail stores, and individual retail pad buildings, on
60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commercial district
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63 and 64. Related Files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, and Development Agreement DRC2003-00858 (Continued
from August 27, 2003)
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surroundin.q Land Use and Zoning:
North Vacant; Mixed Use
South - 1-15 Freeway; Subarea 8, General Industrial
East Vacant and 1-15 Freeway; Regional Related Office/Commercial in the Victoria
Community Plan
West Plant Nursery Storage; Open Space
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
September 10, 2003
Page 2
B. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - General Commemial
North - Mixed Use
South - Freeway Right-of-Way and General Industrial
East General Commercial and Freeway Right-of-Way
West Flood Control/Utility Corridor
C. Site Characteristics: The approximate 60-acre site contains a declining vineyard and
supports approximately 13 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat. The elevation of the site
is between 1,160 and 1,200 feet above the mean sea level, and slopes from north to
south.
D. Parkin.q Calculations:
Number of Number of
Square Parking Spaces Spaces
Type of Use Foota.qe Ratio Required Provided
In-line Retail 183,500 1 sp/200 sq.ft. 918
Pad Retail Buildings 67,500 lsp/200 sq.ft. 338
Pad Restaurant (3) 22,200 lsp/200.sq.ft. 111
Totals: 273,200 1,367 1,842
NOTE: The increased parking availability will allow all the pad buildings to be used as
restaurants in conformance with Development Code requirements for increased parking
(above 1/200) in shopping centers with more than 15 percent of the floor area dedicated
for restaurant activities. Also, at the larger 315,000 square foot floor area, 1,575 parking
spaces would be required (at 1/200).
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed project consists of a proposed shopping center with a potential for
up to 315,000 square feet. The project could include 183,500 square feet of in-line retail
stores with 11 individual retail building pads totaling 89,700 square feet, of which 3 are
intended for restaurants (2 of which may include drive-through capability). The project
also includes a Tentative Parcel Map proposing to subdivide the 60-acre site into 12
pamels.
Staff believes the site plan has been appropriately designed with the pad buildings forming
a practical and attractive streetscape along Foothill Boulevard. In addition, the major in-
line stores will form an impressive backdrop for the site when viewed from the 1-15
Freeway. The architecture has elements that make the buildings compatible with the
City's desire for a "Route 66'WVinery theme along Foothill Boulevard. Staff recommends
the expansion of the Activity Center streetscape treatment to include the entire Foothill
Boulevard frontage along this and neighboring sites.
Lastly, it is of note that at the crossing of the main east-west drive aisle for the center,
there is to be a traffic roundabout at its intersection with Day Creek Boulevard. The use of
this devise is appropriate given the close proximity of the crossing to the Foothill
Boulevard intersection. The City Traffic Engineer has accepted it as a viable solution.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
September 10, 2003
Page 3
B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman)
reviewed the project on May 6, 2003, and recommended approval of the project subject to
minor revisions. Generally, the Committee complemented the designer's effort in
providing a range of architectural features that results a varied and interesting assemblage
of "Route 66"/Winery character.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on
May 6, 2003. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions
contained in the attached Resolution of Approval.
D. Gradin.q Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on May 6 and
August 5, 2003. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to
conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval.
E. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October
17, 2001, as the Final EIR for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update.
The Classification of General Plan Roadways was also addressed in the General Plan
Update and EIR adopted in 2001. The Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality
Act Section 15166 provides that when a Program EIR has been certified, subsequent
activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine
whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that
no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency
can approve the activity as being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the
applicant has proposed modifications to the Master Plan Circulation System, an
Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR was prepared, and all feasible mitigation
measures developed in the Program EIR have been incorporated into the project design.
In summary, the addendum analyzes, a) The potential of changing Day Creek Boulevard
(south of Foothill Boulevard) from a Secondary Street to a Collector classification; b) the
addition of a project specific development, of up to 315,000 square feet, at the south side
of Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard; and c) whether these actions are within the
scope of the previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final
Environmental Impact Report. The proposed commercial development will result in
impacts at levels anticipated for commercial development of the site in the recent General
Plan Update.
~ · e,..- An addendum to the previously certified City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan
Final Environmental Impact Report is the appropriate documentation because some
changes and additions are necessary to allow for the development, as anticipated within
the General Plan General Commercial designation of the site. The addendum identified
that there are no substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the
previous EIR. The appropriate findings of the addendum are included in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property
owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00839 - O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
September 10, 2003
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of General
Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002 and Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00616, and
concurs with the recommendations of the Design Review Committee it would be appropriate to
recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and Conditional Use Permit to the City
Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:AVV~rna
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Title Page and Site Utilization Maps
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plans and Building Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Line-of-Sight Sections
Exhibit "F" - Foothill Boulevard/Day Creek Boulevard Road Plan
Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "H" - Preliminary Landscape Plan
Exhibit "1" Addendum to 2001 General Plan Final EIR
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16033
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Conditional Use Permit
DRC2002-00839
Location Map
DRC2002-00839 i
SUBTPM16033
-d
Rt.
GPA2002-00002
DCA2003-00616
ENTER-ARC
ENTER-ARC
~RTH ELEVATION (rACING FOOTHILL BLVD.) ~H ELEVATION A- 6
' ~ ENTER-ARC
~i~,, ,n n n n nn
/j ~J' ~ I/, 'hl
ENTER-ARC
ENTER-ARC
:'NTER-ARC
ENTER-ARC
o
· __ , , . j ~
ENTER-ARC
ENTER-ARC
JA 14
_
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR FOOTHILL CROSSING
o 4. ~ H~LDN~. LL~
lulATOHLINE E~EE ~'-IEEET 4
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET 6
I
, ,
I
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 8
URBAN
.... JF.M,. ! 1
8,800 S F.
I H E C [ T Y 0 F
I~ANCIIO CIJ CAM 0 N GA
DATE: September 24, 2003
TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
Linda Daniels, RDA Manager
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 200'1 GENERAL PLAN FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2003-00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - The review of a Development
Agreement for a proposed shopping center of up to 3'15,000 square feet, that includes
in-line retail stores and individual retail pad buildings on 60 acres of land on the southeast
and southwest comers of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional
Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-02'1-62,
63, and 64. Related Files: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development
Code Amendment DCA2003-006'16, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM'16033, and
Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839. An Environmental Impact Report was
previously certified in October 200`1. The addendum is being prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act.
BACKGROUND: O & S Holdings, LLC (developer) also known as Foothill Crossing, LLC and legal
owner of the property has submitted a development application for a shopping center development of up
to 3'15,000 square feet on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the I-'15 Freeway, and east of the
Day Creek Flood Control Channel (Exhibit "A").
The subject applications were continued from the September '10, 2003, meeting at the request of the
applicant. This request was in order to work on modifications to the draft Development Agreement and
to address procedural issues regarding the conditions of approval for the accompanying Conditional Use
Permit and parcel map.
The changes have been made and the applications with recommended conditions are ready for
Commission review and action. Refer to the staff report of September '10, 2003, and the Resolutions
accompanying this report for the discussion of issues and conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
Development Agreement to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution.
../~rad
City Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Planning Commission Staff Report, September 10, 2003
Revised Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Agreement
DRC2003-00858
/7¥
T H E C I T Y O F
[~AN C~] O C UCAM ON GA
DATE: September 10, 2003
T~. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROIV[ Brad Buller, City Planner
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Flavio H. Nufiez, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2001 GENERAL PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2003-00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC - The review of a
Development Agreement for a proposed shopping center of up to 315,000
square feet, that includes in-line retail stores and individual retail pad buildings on
60 acres of land on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill Boulevard
and Day Creek Boulevard within the Regional Related Office/Commercial District
of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0229-021-62, 63, and 64. Related Files:
General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DCA2003-00616, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16033, and Conditional Use
Permit DRC2002-00839. An Environmental Impact Report was previously
certified in October 2001. The addendum is being prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act.
BACKGROUND: O & S Holdings, LLC (developer) also known as Foothill Crossing, LLC and
legal owner of the property has submitted a development application for a shopping center
development of up to 315,000 square feet on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the
1-15 Freeway, and east of the Day Creek Flood Control Channel (Exhibit "A"). As part of the
project, the developer has been conditioned to construct Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill.
As a result of this condition, the developer has stated that it will be an additional financial liability
that makes their project unfeasible. The developer is requesting City assistance for the
construction of the street and other related construction fees associated with the project.
The attached Development Agreement conditions the developer to design and install Day Creek
Boulevard as part of their development, and outlines the method for repayment. Related
resolutions for your COnsideration for General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002 and
Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00616 authorize the City Planner to make minor
administrative approvals. This Development Agreement further authorizes the City Manager to
make minor changes as outlined in the Agreement without Council Action.
ANALYSIS: This section summarizes the major deal points of the Development Agreement as
they relate to the construction of Day Creek Boulevard and the proposed shopping center
development. The Development Agreement has been drafted to assure that the construction of
175
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
September 10, 2003
Page 2
Day Creek Boulevard is done to City specifications, and also guarantees the proposed shopping
center will contain an anchor store.
The subsequent points outline the major points of the Development Agreement.
1. The developer will design and construct Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard
south to Day Creek Flood Control Channel.
2. The City will reimburse the developer on a monthly basis for design and construction of
Day Creek Boulevard.
3. Any cost overrun associated with design and construction of Day Creek Boulevard will
be paid for by the developer.
4. Before the City begins any reimbursement of design and construction costs, the
developer shall provide the City with a Letter Of Intent (L.O.I.) from an anchor tenant.
5. Within 120 days following submittal of the L.O.I., the City will be presented with a copy
of the signed lease with the anchor tenant.
6. The City will defer the Traffic Impact Fees until occupancy by the anchor tenant and
such fees will be waived after 5 years of occupancy by the anchor tenant.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project. The addendum identified that thero are no
substantial changes in the project that require major revision to the previous EIR. Findings of
the addendum have been included in a related Resolution for approval prepared for a General
Plan Amendment and related Development Code Amendment.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of
the Development Agreement to the City Council through the adoption of the attached
Resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
BB/JO:FN:gs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Dr'a~ Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Agreement DRC2003-00858
EXHIBIT "A" - LOCATION MAP
FOOTHILL
ARRC)W
.,~(~ ~ City Boundary ~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002, TO CHANGE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
FROM A SECONDARY ARTERIAL TO A COLLECTOR AND A MODIFIED
COLLECTOR BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER
AVENUE ON THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION PLAN, EXHIBIT 111-4,
TABLE II1-11, AND THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF GENERAL PLAN
ROADWAYS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0229-021-62, 63, AND 64.
A. Recitals.
1. O & S Holdings, LLC, filed an application for General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." Subsequent to filing, O & S Holdings, LLC
assigned its interest in the application to Foothill Crossing, LLC.
2. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval of the application.
3. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred..
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard,
approximately 530 feet west of the 1-15 Freeway on-ramp, with a street frontage of approximately
1,300 feet and a lot depth of 1,700 feet, which is presently unimproved; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
is undeveloped and is zoned for commercial uses, the property to the south consists of the 1-15
freeway, the property to the east is undeveloped and is planned for commercial uses, and the
property to the west is an electrical and flood control utility corridor and is being used for plant
nursery storage; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA2002-00002 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 2
c. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Transportation Section
of the General Plan by continuing to designate Day Creek Boulevard as a Collector Road on the
Cimulation Plan; and
d. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties, and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed roadway classification is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding
area; and ·
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as Collector
roads are identified and listed within the Transportation Section.
, 4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October 17, 2001, as the Final EIR
for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Guidelines for the California
Environmental Quality Act Section 15166 provide that when a Program EIR has been certified,
subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the program EIR to determine
whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that no new
effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the
activity as being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the applicant has proposed
modifications to the Master Plan Circulation System, an Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final
EIR was prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the Program EIR have been
incorporated into the project design.
An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation because
some changes or additions are necessary to descdbe the modification to the Master Plan Circulation
System, but none of the conditions described in California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council has
reviewed and considered the attached addendum based on the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified environmental effects; and
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR because of
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exemise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was
certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the project will have one or more
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA2002-00002 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 3
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effects previously examined will
be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, to change the General
Plan Land Circulation Plan, Exhibit 111-4 to designate Day Creek Boulevard as a Modified Collector
with median for approximately 750 feet south of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way, and a Collector
for the remainder of the street to its intersection with Rochester Avenue, and add (in bold print) to
General Plan Table. Ill-11 as shown below:
Exhibit 111-4
(showing southeast portion of map only)
FOOTHILL BLVD.
Grade-separation shp
Railroad.shp
ation-roeds 14 shp
MODIFIED COLLECTOR
Ctybnd shp
Table II1-11 - showing portions to be added (bold) only
CLASS/FICA TIONS OF GENERAL PLAN ROAD WA YS
Boundaries Boundaries
West East North/South St. South
, Creek Blvd. Rochester Ave. 3000' east/northeast
Boundaries Boundaries
East/West Street West East North/South Street North South
Creek Blvd. Foothill Blvd. 750' south
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA2002-00002 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 4
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ORDINANCE NO. 7/?
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00618,
AMENDING SECTION 17.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHANGING THE CLASSIFICATION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE IN
THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, TO A MODIFIED LOCAL
COLLECTOR AS DEPICTED IN FIGURES 17.30.080-J AND
17.30.040-B AND TEXT CHANGES TO SECTION 17.30.080.1.4.
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-
021-20, 34, 47, 53, 54, AND 55.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect
to the above referenced Development Code Amendment, and following the conclusion thereof,
adopted its Resolution No. 03-134, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
3. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect
to the associated General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, and following the conclusion thereof,
adopted its Resolution No. 03-133 recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
4. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the amendment to the Development Code.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby determines that the subject amendment identified in
this Ordinance has been reviewed pursuant to an addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan Environmental Impact Report and finds as follows:
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October 17, 2001, as the Final EIR for the
2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Guidelines for the California Environmental
Quality Act Section 15166 provides that when a Program EIR has been certified, subsequent
activities in the program must be examined in light of the program EIR to determine whether an
additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that no new effects could
occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 03-**
DCA DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 2
being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the applicant has proposed modifications to
the Master Plan Circulation system, an Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR was
prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the Program EIR, have been
incorporated into the project design.
An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation because
some changes or additions are necessary to describe the modification to the Master Plan Cimulation
System, but none of the conditions described in California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council has
reviewed and considered the attached addendum based on the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified environmental effects; and
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the cimumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR because of
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exemise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was
certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effect previously examined will be
substantially more severe that shown in the previous EIR; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
SECTION 3: The following Development Code sections and figures shall be changed as
follows:
a. Figure 17.30.040-B - Streetscape Setback Schedule shall be amended to delete
"Day Creek Boulevard" from the "MAJOR ARTERIAL/SPECIAL BOULEVARD (100-*and 120-foot
Right-of-Way)" listing and be added to the "LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66-foot Right-of-Way)" listing.
b. Figure 17.30.080-J shall be amended to represent (by street line illustration) the
portion of Day Creek Boulevard between the boundary of Subarea 8 and Rochester Avenue as a
"66-foot Right-of-Way."
c. Section 17.30.080-1.4. - Subarea 8, Industrial Districts, of the Development Code
hereby is amended to read, in words (strikeout words indicating deletion of text) and figures, as
follows:
"4. Access and Cimulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections.
120-foot Right-of-Way- D:y Crcc~ Bc"~cvcrd and Milliken Avenue."
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 03-**
DCA DRC2003-00616 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 3
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance
is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or
unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Change to a
local collector
RESOLUTION NO. 03- ~, ~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM16033, A SUBDIVISION OF 15 PARCELS AND PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON 60 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0229-021-62, 63, AND 64.
A. Recitals.
1. O & S Holdings, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map
SUBTPM16033, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." Subsequent to filing, O & S
Holdings, LLC assigned its interest in the application to Foothill Crossing, LLC.
2. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit
DRC2003-00839, and associated General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002 and Development
Code Amendment DRC2003-00616.
3. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the application.
4. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard
approximately 530 feet west of the 1-15 Freeway on ramp, with a street frontage of approximately
1,300 feet and lot depth of 1,700 feet, which is presently unimproved; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
is undeveloped and is zoned for commemial uses, the property to the south consists of the
1-15 Freeway, the property to the east is undeveloped and is planned for commercial uses, and the
properly to the west is an electrical and flood control utility corridor and is being used for plant
nursery storage; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 2
c. The application proposes the construction of a retail shopping center totaling
315,000 square feet with uses that are permitted within the Regional Related Office/Commercial
District of the Victoria Community Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use and accompanying Conditional Use Permit is in compliance with
each of the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community and the Development Code;
and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October 17, 2001, as the Final EIR
for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Guidelines for the California
Environmental Quality Act Section 15166 provides that when a Program EIR has been certified,
subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the program EIR to determine
whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that no new
effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the
activity as being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the applicant has proposed
modifications to the Master Plan Cimulation System, an Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final
EIR was prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the Program EiR, have been
incorporated into the project design.
An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation because
some changes or additions are necessary to describe the modification to the Master Plan Cimulation
System, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council has reviewed and considered the
attached addendum based on the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified environmental effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EiR because of
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was
certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the project will have one or more
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033- FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 3
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effects previously examined will
be substantially more severe that shown in the previous EIR; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the final EIR, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves to the application subject to each and every condition set forth below
and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Planninq Division:
1) Approval of this application is contingent upon the approval of General
Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002, Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839 bythe
City Council in conjunction with approval of the Addendum to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final EIR. All applicable
conditions of approval for DRC2002-00839 shall apply to this
application approval.
2) A reciprocal access agreement shall be enacted between the owner of
this development and the owner of the property to the east for the
shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard, prior to final map
recordation for the phase on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. If
the shared access easement is not enacted, then the applicant shall
modify the Site Plan to provide the driveway solely on the project site to
the satisfaction of the City Planner and will make available an
easement for the neighboring property to gain access to Foothill
Boulevard via the driveway.
En.qineerinq Division
1) The street centerline for Day Creek Boulevard, including, but not
limited to, the curves, tangents, and lengths from Foothill Boulevard to
Rochester Avenue has been approved in concept, but will require
technical plan review to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to
obtaining the off-site street dedications.
2) Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to the westerly property
line of Day Creek Channel shall be improved in accordance with City
"Modified Collector" standards, as required, including, but not limited
to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway, streetlights, street trees, bike lane,
signing, and striping. Modifytraffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and
Foothill Boulevard.
3) Provide a raised median on Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill
Boulevard to the major entrance (roundabout) with landscape and
rockscape to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 4
4) Provide two leE-turn lanes for northbound Day Creek Boulevard at
Foothill Boulevard.
5) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Day Creek Boulevard.
6) The proposed roundabout shall meet the following criteria: 1)
compliance with NHTSA standards; 2) provide sufficient sight lines,
both approaching and around the roundabout island; and 3) the
proposed pedestrian crossings shall be textured concrete of a color
conforming to the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. The
City Engineer has not approved the geometric of the roundabout
indicated on the Site Plan. Submit method of calculation for review and
confirmation of adequate geometrics. The final design is subject to
City Engineer's review.
7) The developer shall process a General Plan Amendment and/or
Specific Plan Amendment to change the Day Creek Boulevard
classification to Modified Collector Street. If Day Creek Boulevard
street re-classification does not get approved, then Day Creek
Boulevard shall be designed as a Modified Secondary.
8) Foothill Boulevard from Day Creek Channel to the I-15 Freeway shall
be improved .in accordance with Caltrans and City "Major Divided
Highway" standards, as required, including, but not limited to, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, driveway, street lights, street trees, signing, and
striping. The improvements shall be coordinated with the Community
Facilities District for Foothill Boulevard. The developer shall make a
good faith effort, to acquire the necessary right-of-way, if needed. If
unable, then the developer shall enter into an agreement to complete
the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and
66462.5.
9) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with
the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan.
10) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Foothill Boulevard.
11) Foothill Boulevard shall require four thru lanes of travel with an
additional continuous right-turn lane from 275 feet west of the project
boundary to Day Creek Boulevard.
12) Foothill Boulevard shall I~ave two leE-turn lanes for eastbound and
westbound traffic at Day Creek Boulevard.
13) Provide for an eastbound bus bay on Foothill Boulevard east of Day
Creek Boulevard.
14) Provide for a raised median on Foothill Boulevard.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 5
15) Each lot on related Pamel Map SUBTPM16033 shall provide reciprocal
access to Day Creek Boulevard and/or Foothill Boulevard.
16) A reciprocal access agreement shall be enacted between the owner of
this development and the owner of the property to the east for the
shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard, prior to final map
recordation for the phase on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. If
the shared access easement is not enacted, then the applicant shall
modify the site plan to provide the driveway solely on the project site to
the satisfaction of the City Planner and will make available an
easement for the neighboring property to gain access to Foothill
Boulevard via the driveway.
17) An on-site storm drain system is required to capture flows before
entering the public right-of-way. An on-site drainage study will be
required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer prior to final
map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
16) In view of the community installation of storm drain facilities for the Day
Creek drainage area, the developer shall pay its fair share of the cost
of the improvements attributed to benefit this development. The "Fair
Share Cost" effective as of September 1, 2003, is $232,492.71.
Additional interest will be required beyond the effective date of
September 1,2003.
19). AIl utilities shall be handled according to the underground utility policy.
20) The developer shall offer all newly constructed electrical distribution
facilities for dedication to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility and
requiring all such developments to be served electrical service by the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility.
21) Other than the roundabout, all access points shall be designed per City
Standard 101 Type C Drive Approach.
22) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan and identify applicable Best
Management Practices on the rough grading plan.
Environmental Mitiqation - The applicant shall implement the following
pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Final Environmental Impact
Report for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (State
Clearinghouse No. 2000061027), and July 21,2003 Addendum thereto, as
certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
Air Quality
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per the manufacturer's specifications. Maintenance
records shall be available at the construction site for City verification.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 6
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit
construction plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the
proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction
contractors shall provided evidence that Iow emissions mobile
construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors
shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District as well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards
noted in South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113.
Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or high volume,
Iow-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in South
Coast Air Quality Management Distdct Rule 1108.
5) All construction shall comply with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Rules 402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall
include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover through seeding and watering on any
area not under construction.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed
excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices;
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to adjacent
public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.
·Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks
or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) All "large-scale" project applications shall provide incentives to use
mass transit including the placement of bus stop shelters along major
thoroughfares if not so equipped.
7) All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bike/walking path
between these bus shelters and the proposed commercial uses.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 7
These paths shall be lit and configured so as to avoid potential conflict
with roadways and railroad activities.
8) All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not
be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e. in excess of 10 minutes).
9) The City shall require that commercial uses designate preferential
parking for vanpools.
10) The proposed commemial areas shall incorporate food service.
11) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be
required to post both bus and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous
areas.
12) All commercial site tenants with more than 50 employees shall be
requested to configure their operating schedules around the MetroLink
schedule to the extent reasonably feasible.
13) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high
efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air-conditioning, appliances and water
heaters.
14) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane
windows and weather-stripping.
Cultural Resources
1 ) It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following
tasks, prior to construction activities in any part of the City.
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the
potential for prehistoric resources, a field survey for prehistoric
resources within portions of the project area not previously
surveyed for cultural resources.
2) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or
during grading, the developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to
monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to
protect or preserve them for study.
3) It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist pedorm the following
tasks, prior to construction activities in part of the City:
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the
potential for historic resources, a field survey for historical
resources within portions of the project area not previously
surveyed for historic resources shall be conducted.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 8
4) If any historical resources are encountered before or during grading,
the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or
preserve them for study.
5) It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist conduct a
pre-construction field survey of any project site within the City that is
underlain by Quaternary alluvium. The paleontologist shall submit a
report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations
regarding further mitigation measures (i.e. monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
Geology and Soils
1)The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety
practices into City codes and project review process.
2) The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to
comply with City provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive
generation of ~lust where the properly is vulnerable to these conditions.
Hazards and Waste Materials
1) The City shall continue to support the County of San Bernardino's
management of the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program to
identify and regulate businesses handling extremely hazardous
materials, or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
2) The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program to address storm
water runoff, pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of waste into
storm drains in the community.
Hydrology and Water
1 ) Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate
development impact fees paid to ensure adequate facilities will exist to
meet the surface water runoff generated by new development.
2) During the construction and operation of new development, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will require the implementation of Best
Management Practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include
the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to control
runoff from the site.
3) During the construction and operation of new development, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will implement Best Management Practices to
minimize pollutant runoff and pemolation into the groundwater basin.
This will include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan to control runoff from the site.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 9
Public Services - Fire Protection
1 ) On a project-specific level, the following mitigation shall be used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the
construction of new fire stations and provisions of Fire
Department personnel to serve their project, prior to issuance of
building permits. Development impact fees shall be evaluated as
necessary to ensure adequate funds are collected to meet
established service levels.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to
the Fire District for review and approval to assure that service to
their site is in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
requirements, prior to approval of Grading Plans.
· Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with
City approved building plans, prior to commencement of
structural framing.
· Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District the
on-site water supply system is designed to provide sufficient fire
flow pressure and storage in accordance with City Fire District
requirements prior to the approval of street improvement plans.
· Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install
automatic sprinkler systems.
Public Services - Po/ice Protection
1) The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning Cdme
Prevention Through Environmental Design as an effective means of
preventing crime. Developers should design structures, access
systems, open space, parking lots, paths, play areas, and other public
spaces to contribute to an overall sense of security and lack of
vulnerability to crime opportunity.
2) The City shall promote the design of developments that provide
maximum visibility approaches to, from, and within the property by
vehicles and particularly by pedestrians.
3) Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that
the crime prevention features originally designed into the project
remain operational.
Public Services - Schools
1) The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of
appropriate school fees, prior to issuance of building permits.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 10
Transportation/Traffic
1 ) Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed
development projects in accordance with the San Bernardino
Congestion Management Plan criteria for requiring a traffic study
(where project traffic is forecasted to generate a minimum 250 two-way
peak hour trips for non-retail land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail
land uses).
2) Intersections that are forecasted to operate at Level Of Service of D or
worse, as identified in the traffic study, shall require analysis for both
interim and future conditions. These priority intersections shall be
identified in the traffic studies prepared for proposed development
which contribute 80 or more two-way peak hour tdps to ensure that
they are operating adequately.
3) Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's
discretion, site-specific access studies to determine the feasibility of
proposed access locations.
4) The City shall ensure sufficient right-of-way is reserved at critical
intersections to implement the approach lane geometrics necessary to
provide the levels of service, as noted within the traffic study.
5) The City shall adopt recommended changes to the General Plan
Circulation roadway classifications, as noted within the traffic study, in
order to accommodate projected traffic increases and to insure that
improvements specified are implemented.
6) Additional improvements will be required beyond that necessary for
typical roadway standards, as defined in the proposed General Plan,
for the intersections listed below to ensure that intersections operate at
a Level of Service of D or better.
· Intersection (Level Of Service is noted for AM/PM)
· 1-15 Freeway southbound ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B,
B)
· 1-15 Freeway north bound ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C,
C)
Utilities and Service Systems
1 ) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated
into the design of the development where appropriate. Measures that
may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include
Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces,
diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
SUBTPM16033 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 11
2) The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System for municipal and private projects to
protect ground water recharge areas form construction and other
potential pollutant runoff.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Pamel Map 16033 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed
project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted
mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when complia,nce will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
SUBTPM 16033 AND DRC2002-00839
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the
applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds
shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report
on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: SUBTPM16033 and CUP DRC2002-00839 Applicant: O & S Holdin,qs
Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meier Date: September 3, 2003
Air Quality
All construction equipment shall be maintained in CP C Review of Plans NC 2/4
good operating condition so as to reduce operational
emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per the manufacturer's specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2
applicants shall submit construction plans to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the proposed
schedule and projected equipment use. Construction
contractors shall provided evidence that iow emissions
mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that
their use was investigated and found to be infeasible
for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any
construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as
well as City Planning Staff.
All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans NC 2/4
performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.
Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or
high volume, iow-pressure spray.
All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of Plans NC 2
standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
All construction shall comply with the SCAQMD Rules CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4
402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall include the
following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4
through seeding and watering.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. CE C Review of Plans NC ~ 2/4
1 of 8
Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans NC
areas to erosion over extended periods of time.
Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans NC
exposed excavated soil during and after the end of
work periods.
Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A
accordance with local ordinances and use sound
engineering practices.
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to CE C Review of Plans A 4
adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result
of hauling.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., CE C Review of Plans A 4
wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with
Rule 403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratioon soils CE C Review of Plans A 4
haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other
suitable means.
All "large-scale" project applications shall provide CE B Review of Plans C 2
incentives to use mass transit including the placement
of bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares if not
so equipped.
All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a CP B Review of Plans C 2
bike/walking path between these bus shelters and the
proposed commercial uses. These paths shall be lit
and configured so as to avoid potential conflict with
roadways and railroad activities.
All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that CP BID Review of Plans A/C 2/3
trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e.
in excess of 10 minutes).
The City shall require that commercial uses designate CP B/D Review of Plans NC 2/3
preferential parking for vanpools.
The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate CP BID Review of Plans NC 2/3
food service.
All commercial site tenants with 50 or more CP BID Review of Plans NC 2/3
employees shall be required to post both bus and
MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas.
2 of 8
All commercial site tenants with more than 50 CP B/DIE Review of Plans A/CID 2/3/6
employees shall be requested to configure their
operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule t<
the extent reasonably feasible.
All commercial structures shall be required to BO B Review of Plans C 2/3
incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air-
conditioning, appliances and water heaters.
All commemial structures shall be required to BO B Review of Plans C 2/3
~ncorporate thermal pane windows and weather-
stripping.
Cultural Resources
It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist
~erform the following tasks prior to construction
activities in any part of the City:
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4
suggests the potential for prehistoric resources, a Report
field survey for prehistoric resources within portions
of the project area not previously surveyed for
cultural resources.
If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CPBO C Reviewer ND 2/4
encountered before or during grading, the developer Report
shall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures
to protect or preserve them for study.
it is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform
the following tasks prior to construction activities in part
of the City:
· Subsequent tea preliminary City review, if evidence CP B Review of A/D 4
suggests the potential for historic resources, a field Report
survey for historical resources within portions of the
project area no previously surveyed for historic
resources shall be conducted.
If any historical resources are encountered before or BO B/C Review of ND 4
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified Report
archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study.
3 of 8
It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist CP B Review of D 4
conduct a pre-construction field survey of any project site Report
within the City that is underlain by Quaternary alluvium.
The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that
will also provide specific recommendations regarding
further mitigation measures (i.e. monitoring) that may be
)riate.
Geology amd Sol s
The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent BO/CE B Review of plans A/C 2/3
seismic safety practices into City codes and project
review process.
The City shall require agricultural operations and new BO/CE C Construction A
construction to comply with City provisions for
preventing soil erosion and excessive generation of
dust where the property is vulnerable to these
conditions.
Hazards and Waste Materials ; :
The City shall continue to support the County of San BO/FC B/E Review of A/C/D 2/3
Bernardino's management of the Hazardous Materials plans/reports
Disclosure Program to identify and regulate
businesses handling extremely hazardous materials,
or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
The City shall continue to participate in the County- CE B/C/E Review of plans A/B/C/D 2/3/4
wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program to address storm water runoff,
pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of waste
into storm drains in the community.
Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed CE B/C/D Review of plans AC 2/4
and/or appropriate development impact fees paid to
ensure adequate facilities will exist to meet the
sudace water runoff generated by new development.
4 of 8
During the construction and operation of new CE B/CID Review of plans NC 2/4
development, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
require the implementation of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include
the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan to control runoff from the site.
During the construction and operation of new CE B/CID Review of p~ans NC 2/4
development, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
implement best management practices to minimize
)ollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater
basin. This will include the preparation of a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan to control runoff from
the site.
Public Services - Fire PrOtection
On a project-specific let~el, the following mitigation FC B Review of plans NC 2~3~4
shall be used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward FC B Review of plans NC 2~3~4
the construction of new fire stations and provisions
of Fire Department personnel to serve their project
prior to issuance of building permits. Development
impact fees shall be evaluated as necessary to
ensure adequate funds are collected to meet
established service levels.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire FC B Review of plans AIC 2/3/4
access plans to the Fire District for review and
approval to assure that service to their site is in
accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
requirements prior to approval of grading plans.
Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in FC B Review of plans NC 2~3/4
accordance with City approved building plans prior
to commencement of structural framing.
Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire FC B Review of plans NC 21314
District the on-site water supply system is designed
to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage in
accordance with City Fire District requirements prior
to the approval of street improvement plans.
Project applicants for large structures shall be FC B Review of plans A/C 2~3~4
required to install automatic sprinkler systems.
]~ 5of8
The City shall encourage the use of physical site. PO B Review of plans C 2
planning (CPTED - Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design) as an effective means of
preventing crime. Developers should design
structures, access systems, open space, parking lots,
paths, ply areas, and other public spaces to contribute
to an overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability
to crime opportunity.
The City shall promote the design of developments PO B Ongoing C 2
that provide maximum visibility approaches to, from,
and within the property by vehicles and particularly by
pedestrians.
Promote the management and maintenance of project BO E Ongoing A 7
areas so that the crime prevention features originally
designed into the project remain operational.
se Os
PUblic r~ices cho; ;
The City shall continue to require school districts to BO B Review of plans C 2
verify collection of appropriate school fees prior to
issuance of building permits.
TranspOrtation and Traffic
Traffic impact studies shall be required with the CE A Review ef study D 2
submittal of proposed development projects in
accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic
study (where project traffic is forecasted to generate a
minimum 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail
land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail land uses).
intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D CE A Review of study D 2
or worse, as identified in the traffic study, shall require
analysis for both interim and future conditions. These
priority intersections shall be identified in the traffic
studies prepared for proposed develoPment which
contribute 80 or more two-way peak hour trips to
ensure that they are operating adequately.
6of 8
Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at CE A Review of study 3 2
the City's discretion, site-specific access studies to
determine the feasibility of proposed access locations.
The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is CE A Review of study D 2
reserved at critical intersections to implement the
approach lane geometrics necessary to provide the
levels of service, as noted within the traffic study.
The City shall adopt recommended changes to the CE A Review of study D 2
General Plan Circulation roadway classifications, as
noted within the traffic study, in order to accommodate
projected traffic increases and to insure that
improvements specified are implemented.
Additional improvements will be required beyond that CE A Review of plans C 2
necessary for typical roadway standards, as defined in
the proposed General Plan, for the intersections listed
below to ensure that intersections operate at a Level
of Service (LOS) of D or better.
· intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM) CE A Review of plans C 2
· 1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B, B)
· 1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard lC,C)
Utilities and Service Systems
Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site CE B Review of study NC 2/3/4
should be integrated into the design of the
development where appropriate. Measures that may
be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration
include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks
and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders,
seepage pits, and recharge basins.
The City shall implement applicable provisions of the CE B Review of study i A/C 2/3/4
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect
ground Water recharge areas form construction and
other potential pollutant runoff.
7 of 8
key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification: Sanctions
CDP - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
7 - Citation
8 of 8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: SUBTPM16033
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP
APPLICANT: O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF FOOTHILL AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARDS
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Cornpletion Date
A. General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ___/ /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the a~temative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
B. Time Limits
1. This tentative tract map or tentative pamel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning / /
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the
date of the approval.
C. Site Development
1. The s te sha be developed and maintained in accordance with the approve, d plans which include ./ /
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, andscap ng, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan.
2. Prior to any uss of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Div!sion
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to Occupancy.
sc.07.03 ,
Project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~/ /
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _._/ /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the /_._/
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /_.~/
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
2. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /
parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
E. Trip Reduction
1. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus __J /
shelters shall also include an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus
shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained.
F. Landscaping
1. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wails, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in /_~/
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
2. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering /__./
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill
Boulevard.
3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the /__/
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
Project NO. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
4. On projects which abut the 1-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the / /
freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash
deposit. The landscape and irrigation pJans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and
City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the
release of occupancy of the project, if final approvals and/or installation ara not complete at that
time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way.
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / /
of mailboxes. Multi-family rasidential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
H. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: .~/ /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils raport. / /
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signatura are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to
the City prior to permit issuance.
4. Separate permits are raquired for fencing and/or walls. /.--.~
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /
Building and Safety Division.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001 ). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in
effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of
the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
sc.o7.o3 3
Project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant /
shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to:
City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and
Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to
the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or ___/ /
major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a
copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance.
4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map __/ /
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /.~/
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
6. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public /.~_/
counter).
7. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: / /-~
a. Provide a reduced site plan (8 ~" x 11 "), which indicates the non-buildable easement.
b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"
which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s).
J. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ___/ /
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. ___/ /
3. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _.__/ /
Health Services prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC /.~/
Section 1505.
5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A / /
6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / /
7. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906. /-~-/
8. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may·be needed. /~/
K. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading / /.~
Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check.
$C-07-03 4 ,~ / 0
Project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, __/ /
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ! /
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, ___/ /
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ___/ /
street centerline): (As noted on Tentative Parcel Map)
Varies total feet on Foothill Boulevard. ----/ /
Varies. total feet on Day Creek Boulevard. -.---/ /
3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. ---/ /
4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or __/ /
REA's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involved.
5. Reciprocal parking agreements for all pamels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint
maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided end shall be delineated or /.__/
noted on the final map.
7. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the /.~
final map.
8. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be /___/
dedicated to the City.
9. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7
feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the dght turn lane,
a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
10. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / /
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and
66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred
by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with
the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the
amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall
have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies
in particular, but not limited to: Extension Foothill Boulevard.
sc.o,.o3 5
Project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
M. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / /___
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees..
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /
Curb & A.C S de- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other
Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X X X
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping, and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights /.~/
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and /
interoonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City / /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~ /
· adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be ___/ /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
g. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. ___/ /
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /___/
accordance with the City's street tree program.
sc.o,.o3 2/2.
project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
5. install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /_._/
legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.
Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public
landscape improvement plans.
The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables.
Street Name Grow Size* Qty. i
Min.
Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing
Foothill Boulevard PER BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN
Day Creek Boulevard PER BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN
*TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.'
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1 ) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division.
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with ___/__/
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
7. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way: 1-15 /.__/
Freeway.
N. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard median islands only.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas 4(~.°/o) of mortared cobble or / /
other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / /
Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard.
O. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final (~rainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / /
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
SC-07-03 7
Project No. SUBTPM16033
Completion Date
2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of sudace drainage entering the / /
property from adjacent areas.
3. A permit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its / /
right-of-way.
4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~ /
from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
5. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a __/ /
sump catch basin on the public street.
P. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / /
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / ~
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / /
Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them.
Q. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits shall be obtained from the.following agencies for work within their right of-way: $CE. ~ /
2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~ /
new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING
SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SEE A'FI'ACHED
SC-07-03 8
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FIRE SAFETY DIVISION
STANDARD CONDITIONS
FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-02-0838
PROJECT #: SUBTPM16033
PROJECT NAME: Foothill Crossing
DATE: May 3, 2003
PLAN TYPE: Technical Review
APPLICANT NAME: O&S Holdings
OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group M, A, B
FLOOR AREA (S): Various
TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V
FIRE PROTECTION
SYSTEM REQUIRED: Sprinklers, Alarms
LOCATION: Foothill and Day Creek
FD REVIEW BY: Tim Fejeran, Fire Inspector
PLANNER: Alan Warren
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT S_~/ALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, TO VERIFY
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS -
General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included,
Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above
p~;oject.
FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply
1. General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and
location of fire hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants:
a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No
portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For
cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet.
b. Fire hydrants are to be located:
1. At the entrance(s) to a project from the existing public roadways. This includes subdivisions
and industrial parks.
2. At intersections.
3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs.
5. The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control
a fire.
6. Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any building.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
2. Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this project is
4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This flow reflects
a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central
station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended,
and Fire District Ordinances and Standards.
FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection
1. Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet
from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of
the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be
previded. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
2. Number of Fire Hydrants: Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction
thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909)
477-2770
3. Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to th~ issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall
submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the
Fire Safety Division for approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments
1. Required Installations:
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following:
a. Commemial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet
b. Group A Occupancies
contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments
1. Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public reads, streets, and
highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes.
2. Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first
story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed
approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation,
gates, and fences are an obstruction.
3. Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways
are:
a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet.
b. The inside turn radius shall be 20-feet,
c. The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet.
d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet.
e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches.
f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet.
g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 pement.
h. The maximum grade of the driving sudace shall not exceed 12%.
i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW).
4. Access Doorways: In addition to any exterior opening required by the Building or Fire Code, approved
doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows:
a. In buildings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided
in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces required access
roadways or walkways.
b. In buildings with high-piled storage one or more approved access doors shall be provided in
each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces required access
roadways. When a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District
access to all required openings. Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770.
5. Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road
to all required building exterior openings.
6. Fire Lane Identification: All required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage. A
drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to
and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of
the FD Fire Lanes standard.
FSC-8 Fire Alarm System
1. Required Installation: An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD
Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard. Refer to Ordinance
15 and/or the California Fire Code for specific raquiraments.
FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits-Technical Comments
The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the projects
operations or buil~ting construction. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon
approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information:
Note: Carefully review the items below, There may be significant impact on the proposed project.
italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment.
1. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below,
which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or
property.
2. Operate a place of public assembly.
FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice
Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building,
Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical Code; Health and Safety Code; Public Resources
Code; and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards.
.2/7
NOTE: in addition to the fees due at this time.please note that separate plan check fees for tenant
improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of
plans.
FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods
The Fire Safety Division will review requests for altemate materials and methods within the scope of our
authority. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with
supporting documents. Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance.
PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase
1. Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City
Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices. The subdivider shall enter into an
agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption equipment for the surrounding
controlled intersections.
2. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire District
access:
a. Requires passage on property not under the control of the applicant; or
b. Does not access a public way; or
c. Crosses a property line
Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use
by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that
no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access. The
recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below. The agreement shall be
recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The agreement shall be approved by the
Fire Safety Division prior to recordation.
To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the
submittal:
a. Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation
proving ownership of all properly included in the agreement.
b. Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement.
c. Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's pamel numbers of each parcel subject to the
agreement.
d. Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and
Fire Lanes listed above. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width,
turn radii, load-bearing capacity of roadway sudace, etc. shall be provided.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
3. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire
mains or appurtenances thereto:
a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or
b. Crosses a property line
Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non-
exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants,
and built-in fire protection systems. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division. The agreement shall be recorded with the County
of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior
to recordation.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following:
1. Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Pdor to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit
construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for
review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District
standards. Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and
Water Plans." Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed,
flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber,
roofing materials, etc.). A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation
and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the
Fire Safety Division. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
3. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan
showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District
and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the
project. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
4. Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to
delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water
District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer
shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Water
District to schedule testing.
5. Architectural Plans- Single-family Residential Hazardous Fire Area: Prior to the issuance of a
building permit the applicant shall submit architectural plans for the review and approval of the Fire Safety
Division. The Fire Safety Division review is intended to ensure that conditions established during the
development review have been included in the design of the project. Contact the Fire Safety Division
(909) 477-2770
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following:
1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire
hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "installation of Reflective
Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the
property owner. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
2. Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of
the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water
District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final
test report to the Fire Safety Division.
3. Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system
shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without
a Fire Construction Services permit. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909)
477-27~3.
4. Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Contact Building
and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
5. Sprinkler Monitoring: The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and
operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required
with 20 sprinklers in Group ~ Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
6. Fire Suppression System: Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of
commemial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction
Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
7. Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system Shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for
review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. Contact Building and Safety/Fire
Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
8. Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vau~t shall be installed prior to final inspection.
Proof of pumhase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety
Division for specific details and ordedng information. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction
Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection.
9. Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in
accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an
approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enfomement
shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual
inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction
Services (909) 477-2713.
10. Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the
address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically
illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public
street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property
entrance. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
11. Multi-unit Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification
letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings. The Fire District shall
review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contact
Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
12. Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction
Services. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
13. Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
14. Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to
the Fire Safety Division. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an
emergency at the subject building or property. Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
Fire District Forms and Letters
Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Planning Division referenced
Fire District forms and letters are not included. Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters. The
forms and letter are also found in previously issued Fire District comments.
Fire District RevieW Letter (P&E)- Template
SL 10/31/02 Revision
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2002-00839, AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVING
THE SITE, CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING, AND ARCHITECTURAL
ELEVATIONS, OF A SHOPPING CENTER OF UP TO 315,000 SQUARE
FEET, INCLUDING IN-LINE RETAIL STORES AND RETAIL PAD
BUILDINGS, WHICH INCLUDE RESTAURANT SITES WITH A
DRiVE-THRU LANE, ON APPROXIMATELY 45.5 ACRES OF LAND AT
THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD WITHIN THE REGIONAL
RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-
APN: 0229-021-62, 63, AND 64.
A. Recitals.
1. O & S Holdings, LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit
DRC2002-00839, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." Subsequent to filing,
O & S Holdings, LLC, assigned its interest in the application to Foothill Crossing, LLC.
2. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of associated General Plan
Amendment GPA2002-00002.
3. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of associated Development
Code Amendment DRC2003-00616.
4. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard
approximately 530 feet west of the 1-15 freeway on ramp, with a street frontage of approximately
1,300 feet and lot depth of 1,700 feet, and which is presently unimproved; and
,22/
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03°
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 2
b. The property to the north of the subject site, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard,
is undeveloped and is zoned for commercial uses, the property to the south consists of the
I-15 Freeway, the property to the east is undeveloped and is planned for commercial uses, and the
property to the west is an electrical and flood control utility corridor and is being used for plant
nursery storage; and
c. The application proposes the construction of a retail shopping center totaling
315,000 square feet, for uses which are permitted within the Regional Related Office/Commercial
District of the Victoria Community; and,
d. The proposed elevation design of the in-line stores and pad buildings, with roofed
towers, curvilinear parapets, and arched entries, is compatible with the "Route 66"ANinery
architectural styles being promoted along Foothill Boulevard and the Victoria Arbors Master Plan;
and,
e. The parking accommodation that exceeds the City's minimum standards and the
inclusion of planters and tree wells is in compliance with the City's landscaping policies.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located as an expansion of
the commercial activities, planned and existing along Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Victoria
Community Plan and the Development Code.
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October 17, 2001, as the Final EIR
for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Guidelines for the California
Environmental Quality Act Section 15166 provides that when a Program EIR has been certified,
subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the program EIR to determine
whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that no new
effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the
activity as being within the scope of the program EIR. Because the applicant has proposed
modifications to the Master Plan Circulation system, an Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final
EIR was prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the Program EIR, have been
incorporated into the project design.
An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation because
some changes or additions are necessary to describe the modification to the Master Plan Circulation
system, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council has reviewed and considered the
attached addendum based on the following findings:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 3
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified environmental effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the cimumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR because of
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was
certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effects previously examined will
be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the final EIR, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves to the application subject to each and every condition set forth below
and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Planninq Division
1 ) A reciprocal access agreement shall be enacted between the owner of
this development and the owner of the property to the east for the
shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard, prior to final map
recordation for the phase on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. If
the shared access easement is not enacted, then the applicant shall
modify the Site Plan to provide the driveway solely on the project site to
the satisfaction of the City Planner and will make available an
easement for the neighboring property to gain access to Foothill
Boulevard via the driveway.
2) With the development of the phase that is on the east side of Day
Creek Boulevard, the shopping center owner shall provide one half of
the shared east property line driveway plus a portion on the
neighboring property to equal 26 feet of paved driveway surface. The
owner shall be responsible for providing the full public right-of-way
improvements (full width driveway apron, curb, gutter, and sidewalk) for
the shared east driveway. If the shared access easement is not
enacted, then the applicant shall modify the Site Plan to provide the
driveway solely on the project site to the satisfaction of the City Planner
in compliance with Planning Condition #1 listed above.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 4
3) The amhitectural elevations and building materials are approved as
submitted with the addition of natural river rock accents at the base of
the in-line buildings. The accents may be in the form of rock wainscots
and/or built up planter structures along the front of the in-line building.
4) Provide a Uniform Sign Program to create a coordinated project theme
of uniform design elements, such as color, lettering style, and
placement. Specify a consistent sign type and avoid mixing different
sign types. Prior to the installation of any business identification signs,
a Uniform Sign Program, in conformance with the City's Sign
Ordinance, shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and
administrative approval.
5) Approval of this application is contingent upon the approval of the
change of the Day Creek Boulevard road classification from Secondary
Arterial to Collector by the adoption of General Plan Amendment
GPA2002-00002 and Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-00616 by the City Council in conjunction with approval of the
Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan Final
EIR.
6) With this project the following landscape theme will be followed for the
Foothill Boulevard south side Activity Center:
a) Double offset rows of Crape Myrtle trees (Lagerstroemia indica)
shall be provided in tree wells along the decorative sidewalk
paving typical of Foothill Boulevard Activity Center.
b) Within the private planting areas, Mexican Fan Palms
(Washingtonia robusta) shall be planted in line, as a backdrop, to
the Crape Myrtles immediately adjacent to the Activity Center
decorative paving.
c) The corner plaza areas and planting backdrop shall be designed
and planted with a combination of Crepe Myrtles and Date Palms
(Phoenix dactylifera) as provided in Exhibit 11 of the Victoria
Arbors Master Plan.
d) The activity center design along the street frontages shall extend
along the south side of Foothill Boulevard from the west driveway
to the plaza on the southwest corner with Day Creek Boulevard;
and to the I-15 Freeway on-ramp from the plaza on the southeast
corner. East of Day Creek Boulevard the applicant will be
responsible for Activity Center installation only along the
shopping center frontage. Additionally, the Activity Center will
extend approximately 160 feet south of the Foothill Boulevard
corners along each side of Day Creek Boulevard.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 5
7) Planters with climbing vines shall be provided on vertical trellis
structures against the east and south elevations of Restaurant 2.
8) Trash enclosures shall be provided throughout the site in conformance
with City standards.
9) On-site pedestrian walkways shall be provided with special pavement,
landscaping, and lighting.
10) Parking areas will be screened from public view with mounding, and
landscaping, or Iow walls.
11) Screen ground-mounted equipment, and utilities from public view.
12) The screening for roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into the
building design (i.e., extend parapet walls).
13) Screen drive-thru lanes from public view with a combination of
landscaping, berming, or Iow screen walls.
14) Thirty percent of all trees are to be box size for the commercial project.
Maintain landscaping for adequate sight lines for motorists at
intersections and driveways.
15) The shopping center may expand in floor area up to 315,000 square
feet subject to City Planner design review process for any uses already
approved by this Conditional Use Permit or approved by the Victoria
Community Plan as a permitted use. The City Planner may, at his
discretion, forward such review to the Design Review Committee and
City Council
16) The building and parking setbacks adjacent to the roundabout shall be
adjusted to satisfy City minimum standards if the roundabout
configuration is changed to comply.with City Engineering requirements.
17) The building height authorized within the shopping center may be up to
65 feet as specified in the Victoria Community Plan.
En.qineerinq Division
1) The street centerline for Day Creek Boulevard, including, but not
limited to, the curves, tangents, and lengths from Foothill Boulevard to
Rochester Avenue has been approved in concept, but will require
technical plan review to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to
obtaining the off-site street dedications.
2) Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to the westerly property
line of Day Creek Channel shall be improved in accordance with City
"Modified Collector" standards, as required, including, but not limited
to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway, street lights, street trees, bike lane,
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 6
signing, and striping. Modify traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and
Foothill Boulevard.
3) Provide a raised median on Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill
Boulevard to the major entrance (roundabout) with landscape and
rocksoape to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4) Provide two left-turn lanes for northbound Day Creek Boulevard at
Foothill Boulevard.
5) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Day Creek Boulevard.
6) The proposed roundabout shall meet the following criteria: 1)
compliance with NHTSA standards, 2) provide sufficient sight lines,
both approaching and around the roundabout island; and 3) the
proposed pedestrian crossings shall be textured concrete of a color
conforming to the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. The
City Engineer has not approved the geometric of the roundabout
indicated on the Site Plan. Submit method of calculation for review and
confirmation of adequate geometrics. The final design is subject to City
Engineer's review.
7) The developer shall process a General Plan Amendment and/or
Specific Plan Amendment to change the Day Creek Boulevard
classification to modified Collector Street. If Day Creek Boulevard
street re-classification does not get approved, then Day Creek
Boulevard shall be designed as a modified Secondary Street.
8) Foothill Boulevard from Day Creek Channel to 1-15 Freeway shall be
improved in accordance with Caltrans and City "Major Divided
Highway" standards, as required, including, but not limited to, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, driveway, streetlights, street trees, signing, and
striping. The improvements shall be coordinated with the Community
Facilities District for Foothill Boulevard. The developer shall make a
good faith effort to acquire the necessary right-of-way, if needed. If
unable, then the developer shall enter into an agreement to complete
the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and
66462.5.
9) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with
the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan.
10) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Foothill Boulevard.
11) Foothill Boulevard shall require four thru lanes of travel with an
additional continuous right-turn lane from 275 feet west of the project
boundary to Day Creek Boulevard.
12) Foothill Boulevard shall have two left-turn lanes for eastbound and
westbound traffic at Day Creek Boulevard.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 7
13) Provide for an eastbound bus bay on Foothill Boulevard east of Day
Creek Boulevard.
14) Provide for a raised median on Foothill Boulevard.
15) Each lot on related Parcel Map SUBTPM16033 shall provide reciprocal
access to Day Creek Boulevard and/or Foothill Boulevard.
16) A reciprocal access agreement shall be enacted between the owner of
this development and the owner of the property to the east for the
shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard, prior to final map
recordation for the phase on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. If
the shared access easement is not enacted, then the applicant shall
modify the Site Plan to provide the driveway solely on the project site to
the satisfaction of the City Planner and will make available an
easement for the neighboring property to gain access to Foothill
Boulevard via the driveway.
17) An on-site storm drain system is required to capture flows before
entering the public right-of-way. An on-site drainage study will be
required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer, prior to final
map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
18) In view of the community installation of storm drain facilities for the Day
Creek drainage area, the developer shall pay its fair share of the cost
of the improvements attributed to benefit this development. The "Fair
Share Cost" effective as of September 1, 2003, is $232,492.71.
Additional interest will be required beyond the effective date of
September 1,2003.
19) All utilities shall be handled according to the underground utility policy.
Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the project shall
have fees paid in accordance with the policy.
20) The developer shall offer all newly constructed electrical distribution
facili!i.es for dedication to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility and
requ~nng all such developments to be served electrical service by the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility.
21 ) Other than the roundabout, all access points shall be designed per City Standard 101 Type C Drive Approach.
22) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan and identify applicable Best
Management Practices on the rough grading plan.
Environmental Mitiqation - The applicant shall implement the following
pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Final Environmental Impact
Report for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (State
Clearinghouse No. 2000061027), and July 21,2003 Addendum thereto, as
certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 8
Air Quality
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per the manufacturer's specifications. Maintenance
records shall be available at the construction site for City verification.
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit
construction plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the
proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction
contractors shall provided evidence that Iow emissions mobile
construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors
shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District as well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards
noted in South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113.
Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or high volume,
Iow-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1108.
5) All construction shall comply with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Rules 402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall
include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover through seeding and watering on any
area not under construction.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed
excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to adjacent
public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 9
·Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks
or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) All "large-scale" project applications shall provide incentives to use
mass transit including the placement of bus stop shelters along major
thoroughfares if not so equipped.
7) All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bike/walking path
between these bus shelters and the proposed commercial uses.
These paths shall be lit and configured so as to avoid potential conflict
with roadways and railroad activities.
8) All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not
be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e. in excess of 10 minutes).
9) The City shall require that commercial uses designate preferential
parking for vanpools.
10) The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate food service.
11) All commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be
required to post both bus and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous
areas.
12) All commercial site tenants with more than 50 employees shall be
requested to configure their operating schedules around the MetroLink
schedule to the extent reasonably feasible.
13) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high
efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air-conditioning, appliances and water
heaters.
14) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane
windows and weather-stripping.
Cultural Resources
1 ) It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist per[orm the following tasks, prior to construction activities in any part of the City.
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the
potential for prehistoric resources, a field survey for prehistoric
resources within portions of the project area not previously
surveyed for cultural resources.
2) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or
during grading, the developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 10
monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to
protect or preserve them for study.
3) It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following
tasks, prior to construction activities in part of the City:'
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the
potential for historic resources, a field survey for historical
resoumes within portions of the project area not previously
surveyed for historic resources shall be conducted.
4) If any historical resources are encountered before or during grading,
the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or
preserve them for study.
5) It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist conduct a
pre-construction field survey of any project site within the City that is
underlain by Quaternary alluvium. The paleontologist shall submit a
report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations
regarding further mitigation measures (i.e. monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
Geology and Soils
1) The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety
practices into City codes and project review process.
2) The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to
comply with City provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive
generation of dust where the property is vulnerable to these conditions.
Hazards and Waste Materials
1) The City shall continue to support the County of San Bernardino's
management of the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program to
identify and regulate businesses handling extremely hazardous
materials, or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
2) The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program to address storm
water runoff, pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of waste into
storm drains in the community.
Hydrology and Water
1) Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate
development impact fees paid to ensure adequate facilities will exist to
meet the surface water runoff generated by new development.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 11
2) During the construction and operation of new development, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will require the implementation of Best
Management Practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include
the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to control
runoff from the site.
3) During the construction and operation of new development, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga will implement Best Management Practices to
minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater basin.
This will include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan to control runoff from the site.
Public Services - Fire Protection
1) On a project-specific level, the following mitigation shall be used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the
construction of new fire stations and provisions of Fire
Department personnel to serve their project, prior to issuance of
building permits. Development impact fees shall be evaluated as
necessary to ensure adequate funds are collected to meet
established service levels.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to
the Fire District for review and approval to assure that service to
their site is in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
requirements, prior to approval of Grading Plans.
· Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with
City approved building plans, prior to commencement of
structural framing.
· Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District the
on-site water supply system is designed to provide sufficient fire
flow pressure and storage in accordance with City Fire District
requirements prior to the approval of street improvement plans.
· Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install
automatic sprinkler systems.
Public Services - Police Protection
1) The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design) as an effective means of
preventing crime. Developers should design structures, access
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 12
systems, open space, parking lots, paths, play areas, and other public
spaces to contribute to an overall sense of security and lack of
vulnerability to crime opportunity.
2) The City shall promote the design of developments that provide
maximum visibility approaches to, from, and within the property by
vehicles and particularly by pedestrians.
3) Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that
the crime prevention features originally designed into the project
remain operational.
Public Services - Schools
1 ) The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of
appropriate school fees, prior to issuance of building permits.
Transportation/Traffic
1 ) Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed
development projects in accordance with the San Bernardino
Congestion Management Plan criteria for requiring a traffic study
(where project traffic is forecasted to generate a minimum 250 two-way
peak hour trips for non-retail land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail
land uses).
2) Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D or worse, as
identified in the traffic study, shall require analysis for both interim and
future conditions. These priority intersections shall be identified in the
traffic studies prepared for proposed development, which contribute
80 or more two-way peak hour trips to ensure that they are operating
adequately.
3) Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's
discretion, site-specific access studies to determine the feasibility of
proposed access locations.
4) The City shall ensure sufficient right-of-way is reserved at critical
intersections to implement the approach lane geometrics necessary to
provide the levels of service, as noted within the traffic study.
5) The City shall adopt recommended changes to the General Plan
Circulation roadway classifications, as noted within the traffic study, in
order to accommodate projected traffic increases and to insure that
improvements specified are implemented.
6) Additional improvements will be required beyond that necessary for
typical roadway standards, as defined in the proposed General Plan,
for the intersections listed below to ensure that intersections operate at
a Level of Service of D or better,
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2002-00839 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 13
· Intersection (Level Of Service is noted for AM/PM)
· 1-15 Freeway southbound Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B,
B)
· 1-15 Freeway northbound Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C,
c)
Utilities and Service Systems
1 ) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated
into the design of the development where appropriate. Measures that
may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include
Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces,
diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
2) The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal and private
projects to protect ground water recharge areas form construction and
other potential pollutant runoff.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Pamel Map 16033 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00839
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed
project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted
mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
SUBTPM 16033 AND DRC2002-00839
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated cimumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An M MP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the
applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds
shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report
on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: SUBTPM16033 and CUP DRC2002-00839 Applicant: O & S Holdin,qs
Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meier Date: September 3, 2003
Air Quality
All construction equipment shall be maintained in CP C Review of Plans NC 2/4
good operating condition so as to reduce operational
emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per the manufacturer's specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2
applicants shall submit construction plans to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga demoting the proposed
schedule and projected equipment use. Construction
contractors shall provided evidence that Iow emissions
mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that
their use was investigated and found to be infeasible
for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any
construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as
well as City Planning Staff.
All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans NC 2/4
performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.
Paints and coating shall be applied either by band or
high volume, Iow-pressure spray.
All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of Plans NC 2
standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
All construction shall comply with the SCAQMD Rules CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4
402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall include the
following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Reviewof Plans NC 2/4
through seeding and watering.
~,~1 Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4
~1~ 1 of 8
CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4
CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4
Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4
accordance with local ordinances and use sound
engineering practices.
· Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to CE C Review of Plans A 4
adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result
of hauling.
Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., CE C Review of Plans A
wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with 4
Rule 403 requirements.
Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4
haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other
suitable means.
All "large-scale' project appl'cat'ons shall provide CE B Review of Plans C 2
incentives to use mass transit including the placement
of bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares if not
so equipped.
All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a CP B Review of Plans C 2
bike/walking path between these bus shelters and the
proposed commercial uses. These paths shall be lit
and configured so as to avoid potential conflict with
roadways and railroad activities.
All commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that CP B/D Review of Plans NC 2/3
trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e.
~n excess of 10 minutes).
The City shall require that commercial uses designate CP B/D Review of Plans NC 2/3
~referential parking for vanpools.
The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate CP B/D Review of Plans NC 2/3
food service.
All commercial site tenants with 50 or more CP B/D Review of Plans NC 2/3
employees shall be required to post both bus and
MetroLink scheduJes Jn conspicuous areas.
2 of 8
All commercial site tenants with more than 50 CP B/D/E Review of Plans A/CID 2/3/6
employees shall be requested to configure their
operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule to
the extent reasonably feasible.
All commercial structures shall be required to BO B Review of Plans C 2/3
incorporate high efficiency/iow polluting heating, air-
conditioning, appliances and water heaters.
All commercial structures shall be required to BO B Review of Plans C 2/3
incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-
stripping.
Cultural Resources
It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist
perform the following tasks prior to construction
activities in any part of the City:
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence CP/BO C Review of ND 3/4
suggests the potential for prehistoric resources, a
field survey for prehistoric resources within portions Report
of the project area not previously surveyed for
cultural resources.
If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CPBO C Review of ND 2/4
encountered before or during grading, the developer Report
shall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures
to protect or preserve them for study.
It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform
the following tasks prior to construction activities in part
of the City:
· Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence CP B Review of ND 4
suggests the potential for historic resources, a field Report
survey for historical resources within portions of the
project area no previously surveyed for historic
resources shall be conducted.
If any historical resources are encountered before or BO B/C Reviewof A/D 4
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified Report
archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study.
~ 3of8
It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist CP B Review of D 4
conduct a pre-construction field survey of any project site
within the City that is underlain by Quaternary alluvium. Report
The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that
will also provide specific recommendations regarding
further mitigation measures (i.e. monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent BO/CE B Review of plans NC 2/3
seismic safety practices into City codes and project
review process.
The City shall require agricultural operations and new BO/CE C Construction A 4
construction to comply with City provisions for
preventing soil erosion and excessive generation of
dust where the property is vulnerable to these
conditions.
Hazards and Waste Materials
The City shall continue to support the County of San BO/FC B/E Review of NC/D 2/3
Bernardino's management of the Hazardous Materials plans/reports
Disclosure Program to identify and regulate
businesses handling extremely hazardous materials,
or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
The City shall continue to participate in the County- CE B/C/E Review of plans NB/C/D 2/3/4
wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program to address storm water runoff,
pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of waste
into storm drains in the community.
HydrolOgY and wa!hr Qua ty
Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed CE B/C/D Review of plans AC 2/4
and/or appropriate development impact fees paid to
ensure adequate facilities will exist to meet the
surface water runoff generated by new development.
4 of 8
During the construction and operation of new CE B/CID Review of plans NC 2/4
development, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
require the implementation of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include
the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan to control runoff from the site.
During the construction and operation of new CE B/CID Review of plans NC 2/4
development, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
implement best management practices to minimize
pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater
basin. This will include the preparation of a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan to control runoff from
the site.
Public Services - Fire Protection
On a project-specific ~evel, the following mitigation FC B Review of plans NC 2/3~4
shall be used:
· Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward FC B Review of plans A/C 2/3/4
the construction of new fire stations and provisions
of Fire Department personnel to serve their project
prior to issuance of building permits. Development
impact fees shall be evaluated as necessary to
ensure adequate funds are collected to meet
established service levels.
· Project applicants shall submit emergency fire FC B Review of plans NC 2/3/4
access plans to the Fire District for review and
approval to assure that service to their site is in
accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
requirements prior to approva~ of grading plans.
i Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in FC B Review of plans A/C 2/3/4
accordance with City approved building plans prior
to commencement of structural framing.
Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire FC B Reviewof plans NC 2/3/4
District the on-site water supply system is designed
to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage in
accordance with City Fire District requirements prior
to the approval of street improvement plans.
· Project applicants for large structures shall be FC B Review of plans NC 2/3/4
required to install automatic sprinkler systems.
5 of 8
The City shall encourage the use of physical site PO B Review of plans C 2
planning (CPTED - Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design) as an effective means of
preventing crime. Developers should design
structures, access systems, open space, parking lots,
paths, ply areas, and other public spaces to contribute
to an overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability
to crime opportunity.
The City shall promote the design of developments PO B Ongoing C 2
that provide maximum visibility approaches to, from,
and within the property by vehicles and particularly by
pedestrians.
Promote the management and maintenance of project BO E Ongoing A 7
areas so that the crime prevention features originally
designed into the project remain operational.
Public Services ~ SchoOls
The City shall continue to require school districts to BO B Review of plans C 2
verify collection of appropriate school fees prior to
issuance of building permits.
Transpo ation and Traffic
Traffic impact studies shall be required with the CE A Review of study D 2
submittal of proposed development projects in
accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic
study (where project traffic is forecasted to generate a
minimum 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail
land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail land uses).
Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D CE A Review of study D 2
or worse, as identified in the traffic study, shall require
analysis for both interim and future conditions. These
priority intersections shall be identified in the traffic
studies prepared for proposed development which
contribute 80 or more two-way peak hour trips to
ensure that they are operating adequately.
6 of 8
Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at CE A Review of study D 2
the City's discretion, site-specific access studies to
determine the feasibility of proposed access locations.
The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is CE A Review of study D 2
reserved at critical intersections to implement the
approach lane 9eometrics necessary to provide the
levels of service, as noted within the traffic study.
The City shall adopt recommended changes to the CE A Review of study D 2
General Plan Circulation roadway classifications, as
noted within the traffic study, in order to accommodate
projected traffic increases and to insure that
improvements specified are implemented.
Additional improvements will be required beyond that CE A Review of plans C 2
necessary for typical roadway standards, as defined in
the proposed General Plan, for the intersections listed
below to ensure that intersections operate at a Level
of Service (LOS) of D or better.
· Intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM) CE A Review of plans C 2
· 1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B, B)
,, 1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C,C)
Utilities and Service Systems
Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site CE B Review of study NC 2/3/4
should be integrated into the design of the
development where appropriate. Measures that may
be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration
include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks
and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders,
seepage pits, and recharge basins.
The City shall implement applicable provisions of the CE B Review of study NC 2/3/4
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect
ground water recharge areas form construction and
other potential pollutant runoff.
7 of 8
key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitorihgr Frequency
CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE ~ City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of O~,'~,p~ncy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D ~ Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
7 - Citation
8 of 8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: DRC2002-00839
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: O & S HOLDINGS, LLC
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF FOOTHILL AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARDS
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT,
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Completion Date
A. General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __/__ __
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such padicipation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligatiops under this condition.
2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 03-136, Standard
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years fTom the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Project No..DRC2002-O0839
Completion Date
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of App"oval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / /
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building pen'nit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / /
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as notto
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / /
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
er masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
10. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / /
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination.
12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
13. Where rook cobble is used, it shall be real river rook. Other Stone veneers may be manufactured / /
products.
D. Shopping Centers
1. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, / /
free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible
with the archJtectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosu~'e, to the satisfaction of the City / /
Planner:
a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). / /
b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /
include self-closing pedestrian doors.
c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / /
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
d. Roll-up doors. / /
e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. ~__/__
f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / /
g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed / /
to be hidden from view.
3. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / /
4. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / /
debris remain for more than 24 hours.
5. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." / /
6. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza; / /
They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination
thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
7. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control, Detailed plans shall be / /
included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
8. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza / /
area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures.
9. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle / /
variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
10. All future projects within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent / /
with the architectural program established.
11. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into / /
the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to the issuance of building permits.
12. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping / /
carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. The shopping
carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each workday.
E, Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / /
building colors.
F, Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts /___/
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
Project No. DRC2002-00839
ComPletion Date
2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided __ / ./
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/
recreational uses.
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, __ /
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more /__./
parking stalls. Designate two pement or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /
parking stalls, Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the
rate of one pement. The area for motomycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet.
G. Trip Reduction
1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily / /
residential projects of moro than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five pement of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage
spaces at a rate of 2.5 pement of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a
3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100.
Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher
whole number,
2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for __/__./
commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 pement of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
3. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus'pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus / /
shelters shall also include an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus
shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained,
4. Shower facilities accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or
bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds:
Commercial: 250,000 square feet
Industrial: 325,000 square feet
Office: 125,000 square feet
Hotels and Motels: 250 rooms
H. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / /__._
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape amhitect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
Project No. DRC2002-OO839
Completion Date
2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking /_.__/
stalls.
3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 /__/
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / _/
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. For m ulti-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for /__/
the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas
within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and
maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing,
and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within
30 days from the date of damage.
6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in __/ /
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
7. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, decorative / ]
sidewalks, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard.
8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the .__/ /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the; .~J /
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of .__/ /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
11. On projects which abut the 1-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the ~ /
freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash
deposit. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and
City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the
release of occupancy of the project. If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that
time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way.
I. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. __/ /~
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
sc-o,.o, ,
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
J. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /._~/
of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mai[boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
K. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets.of plans including the following: ~ /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning. Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /__./
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / /
the City prior to permit issuance.
4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / /
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /
Building and Safety Division.
L. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001 ). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in
effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of
the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant / /
shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to:
City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and
Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to
the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or .~/
major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a
copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance.
4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _~/
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday ___/ /
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
6. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public ~ /
counter).
7. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: __/ /
a. Provide a reduced site plan (8 Y~' x 11"), which indicates the non-buildable easement.
b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"
which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s).
M. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. /.__/
3. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bemardino Environmental __/
Health Services prior to issuance of building permits,
4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC /___/
Section 1505.
5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A /..~J
6. Openings in exterior walls shal~ be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. /_._/
7. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906. /.___/
8. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. /__/
N, Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading /_._/
Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /__/
pedorm such work.
3.A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /___/
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ___/
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed bya California
registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
O. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets / /
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / /
street centerline): (As noted on the Tentative Pamel Map)
Varies total feet on Foothill Boulevard. / /
Varies total feet on Day Creek Boulevard. / /
3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /
4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or __/ /
REAs by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involved.
5. Reciprocal parking agreements for ail parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint / /
maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / /
noted on the final map.
7. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / /
final map.
8. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be /___/
dedicated to the City.
9. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7
feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane,
a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
10. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / /
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and
66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred
by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with
the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the
amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall
have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies
in particular, but not limited to: Extension Foothill Boulevard.
sc.o,.o3 ,
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
P. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped ~ /
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: .~/ /
Curb & J A.C. ] Side- J Drive J Street r Street I Corem I Median I Bike I I
Foothill Boulevard X X X X X X X X
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / / .
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /~
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / /
intemonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City /___/
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with .__./ /
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cress sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
g. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / /
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
sc.o,.03 9
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /__/__
legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.
Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public
landscape improvement plans.
The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer.
GrowMin. Size*Qty.
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing
Foothill Boulevard PER BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN
Day Creek Boulevard PER BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN
*TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division.
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
6. Intersection fine of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with .~/ /
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
7. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way: 1-15 / /
Freeway.
Q. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard median islands only.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or / /
other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / /
Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard.
R. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map /___/
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
SC-07-03 10
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
2. Adequate p[ovisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the / /
property from adjacent areas.
3. A permit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its / /
right-of-way.
4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured /___/
from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
5. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a /___/
sump catch basin on the public street.
S. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / /
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_~/
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. .__/ /
Approval of the final pamel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them.
T. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: SCL. __/ /
2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all .__/ /
new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
U, Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/ /
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. __/ /
V. Security Hardware
1. One.inch single cyJinder dead boits shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within / /
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
SC-07-03 11 ,~ ~/,j//
Project No. DRC2002-00839
Completion Date
2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. / /
3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, / /
or alarmed.
W. Windows
1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / /
2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / /
entry to burglars.
X. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / /
visibility.
2. All developments shall submit an 8 ~" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant / /
developments to the Polic~ Department.
Y. Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / /
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in
turn save dollars and lives.
2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / /
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING
SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED
SC-07-03 12 ~,~55
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FIRE SAFETY DIVISION
STANDARD CONDITIONS
FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-02-0838
PROJECT #: DRC2002-00839
PROJECT NAME: Foothill Crossing
DATE: May 3, 2003
PLAN TYPE: Technical Review
APPLICANT NAME: O&S Holdings
OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group M, A, B
FLOOR AREA (S): Various
TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V
FIRE PROTECTION
SYSTEM REQUIRED: Sprinklers, Alarms
LOCATION: Foothill and Day Creek
FD REVIEW BY: Tim Fejeran, Fire Inspector
PLANNER: Alan Warren
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, TO VERIFY
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS -
General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included,
Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above
project.
FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply
1. General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and
location of fit hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants:
a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No
portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For
cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet.
b. Fire hydrants are to be located:
1. At the entrance(s) to a project from the existing public roadways. This includes subdivisions
and industrial parks.
2. At intersections.
3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs.
5. The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control
a fire.
6. Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any building.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
2. Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this project is
4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This flow reflects
a 50 pement reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central
station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended,
and Fire District Ordinances and Standards.
FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection
1. Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility er building is located more than 150-feet
from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of
the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be
provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
2. Number of Fire Hydrants: Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction
thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909)
477-2770
3. Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall
submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the
Fire Safety Division for approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments
1. Required Installations:
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following:
a. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet
b. Group A Occupancies
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments
1. Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and
highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes.
2. Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the extedor wall of the first
story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed
approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation,
gates, and fences are an obstruction.
3. Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways
are:
a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet.
b. The inside turn radius shall be 20-feet.
c. The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet.
d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet.
e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches.
f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet.
g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 pement.
h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%.
i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW).
4. Access Doorways: in addition to any exterior opening required by the Building or Fire Code, approved
doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows:
a. In buildings without high-piled storage, One or more approved access doors shall be provided
in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces required access
roadways or walkways.
b. In buildings with high-piled storage one or more approved access doom shall be provided in
each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces required access
roadways. When a railroad siding is installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District
access to all required openings. Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770.
5. Access Walkwvays: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road
to all required building exterior openings. -
6. Fire Lane Identification: All required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage. A
drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to
and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of
the FD Fire Lanes standard.
FSC-8 Fire Alarm System
1. Required Installation: An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD
Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted cede or standard. Refer to Ordinance
15 and/or the California Fire Code for specific requirements.
FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments
The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the projects
operations or building construction. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon
approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information:
Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project.
Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment.
1. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below,
which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or
property.
2. Operate a place of public assembly.
FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice
Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building,
Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical Code; Health and Safety Code; Public Resources
Code; and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards.
NOTE: In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant
improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be.assessed at time of submittal of
plans.
FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods
The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our
authority. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with
supporting documents. Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance.
PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase
1. Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City
Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices. The subdivider shall enter into an
agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption equipment for the surrounding
controlled intersections.
2. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire Distdct
access:
a. Requires passage on property not under the control of the applicant; or
b. Does not access a public way; or
c. Crosses a property line
Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use
by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that
no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access. The
recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below. The agreement shall be
recorded with the County of San Bernardine, Recorders Office. The agreement shall be approved by the
Fire Safety Division prior to recordation.
To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the
submittal:
a. Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation
proving ownership of all property included in the agreement.
b. Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement.
c. Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the
agreement.
d. Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and
Fire Lanes listed above. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width,
turn radii, load-bearing capacity of roadway sudace, etc. shall be provided.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
3. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire
mains or appurtenances thereto:
a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or
b. Cresses a property line
Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non-
exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants,
and built-in fire protection systems. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division. The agreement shall be recorded with the County
of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior
to recordation.
Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following:
1. Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit
construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for
review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District
standards. Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and
Water Plans." Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed,
flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber,
roofing materials, etc.). A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation
and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the
Fire Safety Division. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
3. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan
showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District
and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the
project. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
4. Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to
delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water
District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer
shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Water
District to schedule testing.
5. Architectural Plans- Single-family Residential Hazardous Fire Area: Prior to the issuance of a
building permit the applicant shall submit architectural plans for the review and approval of the Fire Safety
Division. The Fire Safety Division review is intended to ensure that conditions established during the
development review have been included in the design of the project. Contact. the Fire Safety. Division
(909) 477-2770
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following:
1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire
hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective
Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the
property owner, Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
2. Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of
the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water
District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final
test report to the Fire Safety Division.
3. Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system
shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without
a Fire Construction Services permit, Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909)
477-2713.
4. Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Contact Building
and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
5. Sprinkler Monitoring: The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and
operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system, Monitoring is required
with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
6. Fire Suppression System: Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of
commemial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction
Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
7. Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for
review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. Contact Building and Safety/Fire
Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
8. Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection.
Proof of pumhase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety
Division for specific details and ordering information. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction
Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection.
9. Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in
accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an
approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enfomement
shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual
inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction
Services (9,09) 477-2713.
10. Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the
address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically
illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public
street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property
entrance. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
11. Multi-unit Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification
letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings. The Fire District shall
review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contact
Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
12. Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction
Services. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
13. Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713.
14. Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to
the Fire Safety Division. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an
emergency at the subject building or property. Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770
Fire District Forms and Letters
Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Planning Division referenced
Fire District forms and letters are not included. Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters. The
forms and letter are also found In previously issued Fire District comments.
Fire District Review Letter (P&E)- Template
SL 10/31/02 Revision
ORDINANCE NO. 7/8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRO2003-00858 WITH FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLO, TO ESTABLISH A
PROCESS FOR FINANCING THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD WITHIN THE FOOTHILL CROSSING SHOPPING
CENTER, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
CORNERS OF DAY CREEK AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARDS AS
PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0210-082-53
THRU 57.
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a
waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and
discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make
maximum efficient utilization of resoumes at the least economic cost to the public.
b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules
and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning
process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic
costs of development."
(ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Any city may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal or
equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this
article..."
(iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows:
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the
permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes.
The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and
requirements for discretionary actions sha!l not prevent development of the land for the uses
and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..."
(iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference is proposed Development Agreement DRC2003-00858, concerning that property
located at the southwest and southeast corners of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards, and as
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DA DRC2003-00858 - FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
October 15, 2003
Page 2
legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development
Agreement."
(v) On September 10, and continued to September 24, 2003, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the
Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval
through the adoption of its Resolution No. 03-132.
(vi) On october 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing concerning the request.
(vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Initial
Study Parts I and II, the Development Agreement, and certified the Mitigated Negative
Declaration in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder.
SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced
public hearings on October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this Development Agreement
are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity.
b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cuoamonga.
SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good
zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement.
SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2003-00858,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY RECORDING FEES EXEMPT DUE TO
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Post Office Box 807 City Clerk
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729-0907
Attention: City Clerk
Space Above Line For Recorder's Use Only)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
11231-O001\745445vlO.doc Exhibit D ~ ~ ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................... 4
SECTION I/. BENEFITS TO CITY .................................................. ~ ..................................... 5
SECTION I~. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 5
A. Scope of Project and Permitted Uses ....................................................................... 5
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies ................................................................. 5
1. Applicable Rules .......................................................................................... 5
2. Conflicting Enactments ................................................................................ 6
C. Future Approvals ..................................................................................................... 6
D. Permitted Conditions ............................................................................................... 7
E. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals ......................................................... 7
F. Moratorium .............................................................................................................. 7
G. Vesting of Owner's Rights ....................................................................................... 8
H. Development Agreement/Project Approvals ........................................................... 8
SECTION IV. OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................. 8
A. Day Creek Boulevard ............................................................................................... 8
B. Payment of Prevailing Wages .................................................................................. 9
C. Limitations on Owner's Obligations to Develop ................................................... l0
SECTION V. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................. 10
A. Reimbursement ...................................................................................................... 10
B. Letter of Intent from Anchor Store ........................................................................ 11
C.. Lease with Anchor Store ........................................................................................ 11
D. Traffic Impact Fees ................................................................................................ 12
E. Landscape Areas .................................................................................................... 14
SECTION VI. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................14
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents ............................................... 14
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation .............................................................. 15
C. Defense of Agreement ........................................................................................... 15
SECTION VI/. GENERAL PROVISIONS .............................................................................. 15
A. Covenants Run with the Land ................................................................................ 15
B. Transfers and Assignments .................................................................................... 16
1. Right to Assign .......................................................................................... 16
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer ........................................................................... 16
C. Mortgagee Protection ............................................................................................. 17
D. Statement of Compliance ....................................................................................... 18
E. Default .................................................................................................................... 18
F. Annual Review ....................................................................................................... 19
11231-0001\745445vl O.doc i O~ ~ ~'"
G. Legal Action ........................................................................................................... 20
H. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative .............................................................................. 20
I. Future Litigation Expenses .................................................................................... 21
1. Payment to Prevailing Party ....................................................................... 21
2. Scope of Fees ............................................................................................. 21
J. Term .................................................................................................................... 22
K. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ............................................ 23
1. Permitted Delays ........................................................................................ 23
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws .............................................................. 23
L. Amendment of Agreement .............................................................................. .. ...... 24
M. Operating Memoranda ........................................................................................... 24
SECTION vm. MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................................ 25
A. Negation of Partnership ......................................................................................... 25
B. No Third Party Beneficiary .................................................................................... 25
C. Entire Agreement ................................................................................................... 25
D. Severability ............................................................................................................ 25
E. Construction of Agreement .................................................................................... 26
F. Section Headings ................................................................................................... 26
G. Applicable Law ...................................................................................................... 26
H. Notices ................................................................................................................... 26
I. Time is of the Essence ........................................................................................... 27
J. Recordation ............................................................................................................ 27
11231-0001\745445v I O.doc ii
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into
as of this -r~l~ day of 'v~c, ,2003, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation and general law city ("City"), and FOOTHILL
CROSSING, LLC., a California limited liability company ("Owner").
WITNESSETH:
A. The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in
a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development, and discourage
investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
B. California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 (the "Development
Agreement Statute") were therefore enacted authorizing a municipality to enter into binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property.
C. Owner has a legal or equitable interest in certain real property that is
approximately 60 acres in size and located on the southeast and southwest corners of Foothill
Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard in the City and more particularly described in Exhibit "A,"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), and depicted on the
location map attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as Exhibit "B."
D. Subject to the provisions of the "Project Approvals" (as defined below),
Owner's Project (as hereinafter defined) will involve the development of the Property with a
commercial shopping center to be known as the Foothill Crossing Shopping Center, as generally
depicted on the site plan attached as Exhibit "C" (the "Project").
11231 -O001\745445vlO.doc 1
E. One key objective of the Project is the development of a shopping center
that is compatible to, and located on land adjacent and southwest of the Victoria Gardens
Regional Shopping Center.
F. On October 17, 2001, the City Council (the "Council"), after making
appropriate findings, certified a Final Environmental Impact Report entitled, "City of Rancho
Cucamonga 2001 General Plan FEIR" pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, such Final Environmental Impact Report being more specifically identified as State
Clearinghouse No. 2000061027 (the "EIR"). On -c~D ,2003, the City Council adopted an
addendum to the previously certified EIR with regard to the Project Approvals and this
Agreement (the "Addendum").
G. Concurrently with adoption of the Ordinance approving this Agreement,
the City has approved General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00002 by City Council Resolution
No. T~ ("General Plan Amendment"), Development Code Amendment DCA20003-00616 by
City Council Ordinance No. 'r~5¢ ("Development Code Amendment"), Conditional Use Permit
and Development Review DRC2002-00839, with Conditions of Approval, by City Council
Resolution No. T~ ("Conditional Use Permit" and "Development Review") and Tentative
Parcel Map No. SUBTPM16033, with Conditions of Approval, by City Council Resolution No.
'r~D ("Tentative Parcel Map"). A depiction of the Tentative Parcel Map is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit "D." (Collectively, the General Plan Amendment, Development
Code Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, Development Review, and Tentative Parcel Map are
hereinafter referred to as the "Project Approvals".)
11231-0001 \745445v lO.doc 2 2~8
H. Development of the Project will further the comprehensive planning
objectives contained within City's General Plan, as amended, and will result in public benefits,
including, among others, the following:
1. Fulfilling long-term economic and social goals for City and the
community;
2. Providing fiscal benefits to City's General Fund;
3. Creating a more diverse economic base;
4. Providing both short-term construction employment and long-term
permanent employment within City;
5. Phasing the construction of public infrastructure improvements
with private development;
6. Constructing roadway improvements on the Property consistent
with, and as required by, the Cimulation Element of the City's General Plan; and
7. Significantly enhance the possibility that the goals of the General
Plan will be realized, including the development of another commercial center, adjacent to the
Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center, that will substantially benefit the community.
I. For the reasons recited herein, City has determined that the Project is a
development for which a development agreement is appropriate under the Development
Agreement Statute.
J. The Council has determined that this Agreement is consistent with the
General Plan and specifically has determined that this Agreement is fair, just and reasonable, and
City has concluded that the economic interests of its citizens and the public health, safety and
welfare will be best served by entering into this Agreement.
11231-0001\745445v lO.doc 3
K. The Planning Commission of City (the "Planning Commission") held a
duly noticed public hearing on this Agreement on September 10, 2003.
L. The Council, after a duly noticed hearing, adopted Ordinance No. -r~e, ,
approving this Agreement, which ordinance will become effective on -r~3~ (the
"Effective Date").
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in
consideration of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS.
The following terms shall have the meanings defined for such terms in the
sections set forth below:
Term Section VII.J.
Addendum Recital F
Agreement Introduction
Anchor Store Section V.B.
Applicable Rules Section I]I.B. 1.
Channel Extension Segment Section IV.A.
City Introduction
Conditional Use Permit Recital G
Council Recital F
Day Creek Boulevard Improvements Section IV.A.
Development Agreement Statute Recital B
Development Code Amendment Recital G
Effective Date Recital L
EIR Recital G
Future Approvals Section II/.C.
General Plan Recital E
General Plan Amendment Recital G
Lease Agreement Section V.C.
Letter of Intent Section V.C.
Ministerial Approvals Section VI.B.
Mortgagee Section VII.C.
Notice of Non-Compliance Section VII.F.
Owner Introduction
Permanent Closure Section VII. J.
I 123 t-0001\745445vl 0.doc 4 O271~
Planning Commission Recital K
Primary Extension Segment Section 1V.A.
Project Recital D
Project Approvals Recital G
Property Recital C
Required Occupancy Date Section V.D.2.
Subsequent Rules Section III.B.2.
Tentative Parcel Map Recital G
Term Section VII.J.
Traffic Impact Fees Section V.D.
Vested Rights Section III.H.
SECTION II. BENEFITS TO CITY.
In consideration of the benefits resulting from this Project, including, but not
limited to, the development of a commercial shopping center, improvements to significant
roadways, including a portion of Day Creek Boulevard, the diversification of the City's
economic base, and the increase in short~term and long-term employment, all of which will
provide a significant overall benefit to City, City has agreed to enter into this Agreement.
SECTION III. PRO~IECT DEVELOPMENT.
A. Scope of Project and Permitted Uses. The parties hereby agree that, for the term
of this Agreement, the permitted uses, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and
size of proposed buildings, provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes
and location of public improvements, shall be those set forth in the Project Approvals and the
"Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined). The term "Project" specifically excludes the Day
Creek Boulevard Improvements (as hereinafter defined).
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies.
1. Applicable Rules. The parties hereby agree that, for the term of this
Agreement, the roles, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, governing
density, and governing design, improvement and specifications applicable to development of the
Property shall be those roles, regulations and official policies in force at the time of the Effective
11231-0001 \745445v 10.doc 5 O~,7/
Date, including, without limitation, the Project Approvals (collectively, the "Applicable Rules").
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude City from applying
changes occurring from time to time in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Electrical Code,
Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, or Uniform Plumbing Code, provided that such
changes are generally applicable to all property in City.
On the Effective Date, City and Owner shall identify two identical sets of
the Applicable Rules, one set for City and one set for Owner, so that if it becomes necessary in
the futura to refer to any of the Applicable Rules, there will be a common set of the Applicable
Rules available to both parties.
2. Conflicting Enactments. Any change in the Applicable Rules, including,
without limitation, any change in any applicable general, community plan, area or specific plan,
zoning, subdivision role or regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date,
including, without limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution,
policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the
Council, the Planning Commission or any other board, agency, commission or department of
City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would,
absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Property and which would conflict in any
way with or be more restrictive than the Applicable Rules ("Subsequent Rules"), shall not be
applied by City to the Property. Owner, in its sole discretion, may give City written notice of its
election to have any Subsequent Rule applied to the Property, in which case such Subsequent
Rule shall be deemed to be an Applicable Rule.
C. Future Approvals. Any development of the Property shall require all
discretionary approvals required by the Applicable Rules (collectively, the "Future Approvals").
I 123 l-O001\745445vlO.doc 6 272
Upon granting of any of the Future Approvals, as they may be amended from time to time, they
shall become part of the Applicable Rules, and Owner shall have a "vested right", as that term is
defined under California law, in and to such Future Approvals by virtue of this Agreement.
D. Permitted Conditions. Provided Owner's applications for any Future Approvals
are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, City shall grant in a timely manner
the Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules and authorize development of the
Property for the uses and to the density of the Project described herein.
E. Term of Map(s) and Other Proiect Approvals. Pursuant to California Government
Code Sections 66452.6(a) and 65863.9, the term of any subdivision or parcel map that may be
processed on all or any portion of the Property and the term of each of the Project Approvals
shall be extended for a period of time through the scheduled termination date of this Agreement
as set forth in Section VII.J. below.
F. Moratorium. No City-imposed moratorium or other limitation (whether relating
to the rate, timing or sequencing of the development or construction of all or any part of the
Property, whether imposed by ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or otherwise, and
whether enacted by the Council, an agency of City, the electorate, or otherwise) affecting parcel
or subdivision maps (whether tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy
certificates or other entitlements to use or service (including, without limitation, water and
sewer) approved, issued or granted within City, or portions of City, shall apply to the Property to
the extent such moratorium or other limitation is in conflict with this Agreement; provided,
however, the provisions of this Section shall not affect City's compliance with moratoria or other
limitations mandated by other governmental agencies or court-imposed moratoria or other
limitations.
i 1231-0001w45445vl 0.doc 7 ~7,,~
G. Vesting of Owner's Rights. The fights and entitlements granted to Owner
pursuant to this Agreement shall be and constitute "vested rights" or the equivalent of "vested
rights", as that term is defined under California law applicable to the development of land or
property and the right of a public entity to regulate or control such development of land or
property, including, without limitation, vested rights in and to building permits and certificates of
occupancy. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement: (1) any fights of Owner to
develop the land and use the Property shall be subject to only those fights provided by California
common law; and (2) nothing contained herein shall provide any additional rights or entitlements
to develop or use the Property beyond or in addition to that which is available in accordance with
California common law, nor shall anything in this Agreement or the termination thereof be
deemed to impair or mstfict such common law rights of Owner.
H. Development AgreemenffProiect Approvals. In the event of any inconsistency
between any Project Approval and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall
control.
SECTION IV. OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS.
A. Day Creek Boulevard. Subject to the provisions of Section V of this Agreement,
and as a condition of the approval by the City of the Project, the Owner shall design and
construct the extension of Day Creek Boulevard from the south curb line of Foothill Boulevard
on the north, through the most westerly border of the Property, (a distance of approximately
2,500 feet) ("Primary Extension Segment") and from the most westerly border of the Property to
up to the west side of the intersection of the Day Creek Flood Control Channel and Day Creek
Boulevard ("Channel Extension Segment"). The Owner's obligation pursuant to this paragraph
shall include, but not be limited to, design, construction and installation of public street curbs,
I 1231-0001W45445vl 0.doc 8
gutters, storm drains, pavement, sidewalks, landscaped medians, street lights, fire hydrants, street
utilities and traffic signals for the Primary Extension Segment and the Channel Extension
Segment (collectively, the "Day Creek Boulevard Improvements"). Owner shall have no
obligation to: (i) construct any extension of Day Creek Boulevard outside of the boundaries of
the Property; or (ii) acquire any rights-of-way, or pay any fees or monies to the City, in
connection with the extension of Day Creek Boulevard outside the boundaries of the Property.
Nothing contained in the immediately preceding sentence shall release Owner from: (i)
constructing the channel Extension Segment unless the County Flood Control District fails to
issue the required approvals necessary to construct the Channel Extension Segment following
written application by Owner for such approvals and payment by Owner of all required
application fees related to the Channel Extension Segment; (ii) constructing the Primary
Extension Segment to the extent any portion of that Primary Extension Segment abuts or crosses
parcels of property that are excluded from the description of the Property; or (iii) paying any
assessments for the construction of improvements to Foothill Boulevard that are required by
CFD 2001-01, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 01-181 and Agency Resolution No.
RA01-011, or CFD 2003-01, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 03-037 and Agency
Resolution No. RA 03-003.
B. Payment of Prevailing Wages. The Owner shall ensure that all work of
construction and installation of the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements shall be done with the
payment of prevailing wages to the applicable work crews. The Owner shall provide sufficient
documentation, as requested by the City Engineer, to document compliance with this
requirement. The provisions of this Section IV.B. shall apply only to the construction and
11231 -O001\7454d, Sv lO.doc 9
installation of the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements and shall not apply to the construction or
operation of the Project.
C. 1 .imitations on Owner's Obligations to Develop. Nothing in this Agreement shall
be construed to require Owner to proceed with the construction of the Project or any buildings or
improvements in the Project. The decision to proceed with implementation or construction of
the Project shall be in the sole discretion of the Owner. Failure of the Owner to proceed with
construction of the Project shall not give rise to any liability, claim for damages or cause of
action against the Owner. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph 1V.C, in
the event Owner commences constmction of the Project or any buildings or improvements in the
Project, nothing contained in this Section IV.C shall relieve Owner of the obligation to complete
the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements or to construct its buildings and improvements in
compliance with the Project Approvals and the Applicable Rules.
SECTION V. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS.
A. Reimbursement. Subject to the provisions of Section V.B. and V.C., the City
shall reimburse the Owner on a monthly basis for the Owner's cost and expense for design and
construction of the Primary Extension Segment, up to a maximum of one million, two hundred
thousand dollars ($1.2 million). In addition, City shall reimburse Owner for the cost and expense
for design and construction of the Channel Extension Segment. Any costs incurred by Owner in
excess of one million, two hundred thousand dollars ($1.2 million) for the Primary Extension
Segment shall be the full and sole responsibility of the Owner and not City. However, Owner
shall submit monthly statements to City specifying the costs and expenses incurred during the
preceding month for the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements together with sufficient
I 1231 -O001\745445vlO.doc lO ~I~ 7~:~
documentation of the expense. Upon receipt of those statements, and City's verification of the
costs and expenses, City shall pay Owner the amount owed within thirty (30) days thereafter.
B. Letter of Intent from Anchor Store. The City shall not he required to reimburse
Owner for the costs and expenses of the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements as specified in
Section V.A. unless and until the Owner provides the City with a letter of intent together with
any supplement to that letter, (which together are defined to constitute a "Letter of Intent")
executed by an "Anchor Store," as hereinafter defined, and addressed to the City wherein the
Anchor Store pledges to enter into a agreement with Owner to rent, occupy and operate for
business a retail store within the Project. The Letter of Intent shall also include a statement, in
the form acceptable to the City that guarantees to the City that as a result of becoming an Anchor
Store within the Project, it will not close any point of sale or relocation within the market area as
defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 33426.7 for a period of one year from the
date of occupancy by the Anchor Store. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Anchor
Store" shall mean a person, group, partnership or corporation that shall rent, occupy and operate
a retail business involving land or building with a gross lease area of 100,000 square feet or
greater within the Project. Prior to Owner's submission to City of a signed lease agreement
between the Owner and the Anchor Store, the maximum reimbursement by City of Owner's
costs and expenses of the Primary Extension Segment pursuant to this paragraph V.B. shall not
exceed six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000).
C. Lease with Anchor Store. Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the City
has received the Letter of Intent from the Anchor Store, the Owner shall present to the City a
copy of an signed lease agreement between the Owner and the Anchor Store that provides: (i)
sufficient evidence that the Anchor Store has agreed to lease, occupy and operate as a Anchor
11231-0001\745445v10.doc 11 ,~ 7 7
Store within the Project; and (ii) contains a guarantee that as a result of becoming an Anchor
Store within the Project, the Anchor Store will not close any point of sale or relocation within the
market area as defined in California Health & Safety Code Section 33426.7 for a period of one
year from the date of occupancy by the Anchor Store (the "Lease Agreement"). During the
intervening time between' the submission to the City of the Letter of Intent and the submission to
City of the Lease Agreement, the City shall pay Owner for any monthly costs and expenses
incurred for the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements, if any, in accordance with the terms of
Section V.A. If City has not received the Lease Agreement within one hundred twenty (120)
days after receipt of the Letter of Intent, City shall not be obligated to pay any outstanding
statements from Owner for the Day Creek Boulevard Improvements and Owner shall promptly,
and no later than thirty (30) days thereafter, reimburse City for any and all payments made to
Owner for the Reimbursable Improvements pursuant to Section V.A. The City Manager may,
but is not required to, approve reasonable extensions to the time periods specified for the
Owner's actions that are specified in this paragraph, up to a maximum of sixty (60) days for any
such deadline.
D. Traffic Impact Fees.
1. Upon receipt by City of the Letter of Intent, Owner's obligation to pay six
hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) of the total amount of City~Wide System Fees for
Transportation Development, as defined in Chapter 3.28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code (the "Traffic Impact Fees") for the Project shall be deferred until the date of occupancy of
the Anchor Store. The maximum amount of Traffic Impact Fees for the Project that shall be
deferred pursuant to this paragraph V.D. shall be six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) and
any Traffic Impact Fees required for the Project in excess of six hundred thousand ($600,000)
I 1231-0001\745445vl 0.doc 12 ,~7~}
shall be due and payable by Owner in accordance with the terms and conditions of Chapter 3.28
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Owner shall not be entitled to, and City shall have
no obligation to provide, any credit, waiver or offset to the Traffic Impact Fees required for the
Project as a result of the Owner's design and construction of the Day Creek Boulevard
Improvements.
2. If the City has received a copy of the Lease Agreement but the Anchor
Store has not commenced occupancy within the Project within two (2) years of the Effective
Date of this Agreement, (subject to any extension in accordance with Section VI].K. 1.), (the
"Required Occupancy Date"), Owner shall, within thirty days (30) days following the Required
Occupancy Date, pay the City the full amount of Traffic Impact Fees that would otherwise be
owing for the Project based on the rate of fees that was in effect at the time the fees would have
originally been due and payable. In the event the Owner is required to pay the full amount of
Traffic Impact Fees pursuant to this paragraph V.D.2., Owner shall not be entitled to, and City
shall have no obligation to provide, any credit, waiver or offset to the Traffic Impact Fees
required for the Project as a result of the Owner's design and construction of the Day Creek
Boulevard Improvements. The Owner's Obligations under this paragraph shall survive the
termination or expiration of this Agreement.
3. Upon occupancy of Anchor Store within the Project, Owner's obligation
to pay six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) of Traffic Impact Fees for those buildings within
the Project, shall be deferred for an additional five (5) years, measured from the date of
occupancy of the Anchor Store.
4. If the Anchor Store has continued to occupy and remain open for business
within the Project for five (5) years following occupancy (subject to permitted interruptions in
1123 l-O001\745445v I O.doc 13
accordance with Section VII.K. 1), Owner shall be released from all obligations to pay six
hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) of the total Traffic Impact Fees for all buildings in the
Project.
5. If the Anchor Store falls to occupy and remain open for business for a full
five (5) years after occupancy within the Project, Owner shall, within thirty days (30) days
thereafter, pay the City the full amount of Traffic Impact Fees that would otherwise be owing for
the Project based on the rate of fees that was in effect at the time the fees would have originally
been due and payable. In the event the Owner is required to pay the full amount of Traffic
Impact Fees pursuant to this paragraph V.D.5., Owner shall not be entitled to, and City shall
have no obligation to provide, any credit, waiver or offset to the Traffic Impact Fees required for
the Project as a result of the Owner's design and construction of the Day Creek Boulevard
Improvements. The Owner's Obligations under this paragraph shall survive the termination or
expiration of this Agreement.
E. Landscape Areas. City or a City landscaping and lighting or similar district shall
assume ownership and maintenance of the median strip within Day Creek Boulevard within the
Project boundaries upon acceptance and final inspection of the Day Creek Boulevard
Improvements. Upon such assumption of ownership by the City or district, Owner shall have no
further responsibility or obligation to repair or maintain the median strip.
SECTION VI. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION.
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents. Each party shall take all
actions and do all things, and execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit, if required, any and all
documents and writings, that may be necessary or proper to achieve the punposes and objectives
of this Agreement.
Il 231-0001\745445v lO.doc 14 ,~ ~
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s)
against City or Owner relating to this Agreement, the Project Approvals or to other development
issues affecting the Property shall not delay or stop the development, processing or construction
of the Project, approval of the Future Approvals, or issuance of "Ministerial Approvals" (as
hereinafter defined), unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. For
purposes of this Agreement the term "Ministerial Approvals" shall be defined to mean approvals
requiring the determination of conformance with the Applicable Rules, including, without
limitation, site plans, design review, development plans, land use plans, grading plans,
improvement plans, building plans and specifications, and ministerial issuance of one or more
final maps, zoning clearances, grading permits, improvement permits, wall permits, building
permits, lot line adjustments, encroachment permits, conditional and temporary use permits,
certificates of use and occupancy and approvals and entitlements and related matters as may be
necessary for the completion of the development of the Property.
C. Defense of Agreement. City shall take all actions which are necessary or
advisable to uphold the validity and enfomeability of this Agreement. If this Agreement is
adjudicated or determined to be invalid or unenfomeable, City agrees, subject to all legal
requirements, to consider modifications to this Agreement proposed by Owner to render it valid
and enforceable to the extent permitted by applicable law.
SECTION VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Covenants Run with the Land. All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers,
standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, reorganization, consolidation or
otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons
11231-0001\745445v10.doc 15 ~/
acquiring the Property, or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of
law or in any manner whatsoever, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective
heirs, successors and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants
running with the land.
B. Transfers and Assignments.
1. Right to Assign. Owner shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer all
or portions of the real property comprising the Property to any person at any time during the term
of this Agreement.
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer. Upon the delegation of all duties and
obligations and the sale, transfer or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, Owner shall
be released from its obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion
thereof, so transferred arising subsequent to the effective date of such transfer if (i) Owner has
provided to City ten days' written notice of such transfer and (ii) the transferee has agreed in
writing to be subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable to the portion of the Property so
transferred. Upon any transfer of any portion of the Property and the express assumption of
Owner's obligations under this Agreement by such transferee, City agrees to look solely to the
transferee for compliance by such transferee with the provisions of this Agreement as such
provisions relate to the portion of the Property acquired by such transferee. A default by any
transferee shall only affect that portion of the Property owned by such transferee and shall not
cancel or diminish in any way Owner's rights hereunder with respect to any portion of the
Property not owned by such transferee. The transferee shall be responsible for the reporting and
annual review requirements relating to the portion of the Property owned by such transferee, and
11231-0001\745445v10.doc 16 ,,~ ~2
any amendment to this Agreement between City and a transferee shall only affect the portion of
the Property owned by such transferee.
C. Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not
prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the
Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or
other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that the
lender(s) providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and
modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Owner and
representatives of such lender(s) to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or
modification. City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested
interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the
intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any mortgagee of a mortgage or a beneficiary of a deed
of trust ("Mortgagee") of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
1. Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall
defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust on the
Property made in good faith and for value.
2. If City timely receives a request from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of
any notice of default given to Owner under the terms of this Agreement, City shall provide a
copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten days of sending the notice of default to Owner.
The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the
remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement.
3. Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part
thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such
11231-000l\745445vl O.doc 17 ,~ ~J
foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement;
provided, however, in no event shall such Mortgagee be liable for any defaults or monetary
obligations of Owner arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such Mortgagee,
except that any such Mortgagee or its successors or assigns shall not be entitled to a building
permit or occupancy certificate until all delinquent and current fees and other monetary
obligations due under this Agreement for the Property, or portion thereof, acquired by such
Mortgagee have been paid to City.
D. Statement of Compliance. Within thirty days following any written request which
either City or Owner may make from time to time, the other shall execute and deliver to the
requesting party a statement certifying that to the City's knowledge: (1) this Agreement is
unmodified and in full force and effect or, if there have been modifications hereto, that this
Agreement is in full force and effect, as modified, and stating the date and nature of such
modifications; (2) there are no current uncured defaults under this Agreement or specifying the
dates and nature of any such defaults; and (3) any other reasonable information requested. The
failure to deliver such statement within such time shall be conclusive upon the party which fails
to deliver such statement that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification and
that there are no uncured defaults in the performance of the requesting party. The City Manager
shall be authorized to execute any such statement.
E. Default. Failure by City or Owner to perform any term or provision of this
Agreement for a period of thirty days from the receipt of written notice thereof from the other
shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to extensions of time by mutual consent
in writing. Said notice shall specify in detail the nature of the alleged default and the manner in
which said default may be satisfactorily cured. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it
i 1231-0001\745445v 10.doc 18 ,~¢
cannot reasonably be cured within such 30-day period, the commencement of the cure within
such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure
within such period.
Subject to the foregoing, after notice and expiration of the 30-day period without
cure, the notifying party, at its option, may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement
and/or give notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section
65868. Following such notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for
consideration and review by the Council within thirty calendar days in the manner set forth in
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Following consideration of the evidence
presented in said review before the Council and a determination that a default exists, the party
alleging the default by the other party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement
to the other party.
F. Annual Review. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, throughout the
term of this Agreement, good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement by Owner shall
be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission
meeting next following each annual anniversary of the Effective Date. If as a result of such
review, City reasonably determines, on the basis of substantial evidence presented at such
meeting, that Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions hereof, City
shall provide written notice thereof ("Notice of Non-Compliance"), stating in specific detail and
specific reasons for such finding. After City delivers the Notice of Non-Compliance, Owner
shall have the right to cure such non-compliance as provided in Section VI/.E. above. In the
event that Owner does not timely cure the non-compliance after a Notice of Non-Compliance is
delivered by City or, if during the period which Owner must cure such default, Owner ceases to
11231-0001\745445v 10.doc 19
make reasonable efforts to effect such cure, City may proceed to terminate this Agreement on ten
days' prior written notice to Owner in accordance with the termination procedure set forth in
Section VII.E. above.
G. Legal Action. Any party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies,
institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement
heroin, ~njoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specific performance
the obligations and rights of the parties hereto.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 638, et seq., all legal actions shall be
heard by a referee who shall be a retired.judge from either the San Bemardino County Superior
Court, the California Court of Appeal, the United States District Court or the United States Court
of Appeals, provided that the selected referee shall have experience in resolving land use and real
property disputes. Owner and City shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues,
whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and
equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy before such referee. If
Owner and City are unable to agree on a referee within ten days of a written request to do so by
either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be borne equally by the
parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section VII.G. shall be considered a temporary
judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution.
H. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by City or Owner to insist upon the strict
performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement, irrespective of the length of time for
which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to demand strict
compliance with this Agreement in the future. No waiver by City or Owner of a default or
i 1231-0001 \745445v 10.doc 20
breach of any other party shall be effective or binding upon it unless made in writing, and no
such waiver shall be implied from any omission by City or Owner to take any action with respect
to such default or breach. No express written waiver of any defaults or breach shall affect any
other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or
period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of a default or
breach under any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any subsequent default or
breach, and the performance of the same or any other term or provision contained in this
Agreement. Subject to notice of default hnd opportunity to cure under Section VII.E., all of the
remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, at law or in equity, shall be cumulative
and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or
election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right or remedy.
I. Future Litigation Expenses.
1. Payment to Prevailing Party. If City or Owner brings an action or
proceeding (including, without limitation, any motion, order to show cause, cross-complaint,
counterclaim, or third-party claim) by reason of defaults, breaches, tortious acts, or otherwise
arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled
to its costs and expenses of suit including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and
expert witness fees.
2. Scope of Fees. Attorneys' fees under this Section shall include attorneys'
fees on any appeal and, in addition, a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action. In addition to the
foregoing award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party, the prevailing party in any lawsuit
shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees incurred in any post-judgment proceedings to collect or
11231-0001\745445v 10.doc 21 O~,~7
enforce the judgment. This provision is separate and several and shall survive the merger of this
Agreement into any judgment on this Agreement.
J. Term. Unless the "Term" (as hereinafter defined) of this Agreement is otherwise
terminated, modified or extended by cimumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual
consent of the parties, the duration of this Development Agreement (the "Term") shall be from
the Effective date of this Agreement to the earliest to occur of the following dates:
1. Thirty (30) days following the Required Occupancy Date if the Anchor
Store has not commenced occupancy within the Project on or prior to the Required Occupancy
Date.
2. Thirty (30) days following the permanent closure, as such term is
hereinafter defined, of the Anchor Store if the Anchor Store has commenced occupancy within
the Project on or before the Required Occupancy Date but permanently closes for business
within the Project within five (5) years after its initial occupancy; or
3. Thirty (30) days following the fifth (5th) anniversary of the actual date of
initial occupancy of the Anchor Store if the Anchor Store has commenced occupancy within the
Project and continued to occupy and remain open for business within the Project for a period of
five (5) years.
For purposes of this Section VII.J., the terms "permanent closure" and
"permanently closes" shall mean the cessation or ceasing, respectively, by the Anchor Store of
the sale of goods and services of the same general type and character as originally conducted
upon initial occupancy of the Project, which cessation or ceasing lasts more than seven calendar
days and is caused by any action or event other than an event specified in Section VI/.K. 1. If
the cessation described herein is caused by an event listed in Section VII.K. 1, and has a duration
i 1231 -OOOl\745445v10.doc 22 1¢~9'
of mom than six (6) months, the Anchor Store shall be deemed to be permanently closed,
whether or not it thereafter reopens for business. The terms "permanent closure" and
"permanent closing" shall also include a reduction of more than five pement (5%) of the total
square footage of the building that was occupied by the Anchor Store on the date the Anchor
Store initially opened for.business.
K. Permitted Delays; Supersedum by Subsequent Laws.
1. Permitted Delays. In addition to any specific provisions of this
Agreement, performance of obligations hereunder shall be excused and the Term of this
Agreement shall be similarly extended during any period of delay caused at any time by reason
of: acts of God such as floods, earthquakes, rims, or similar catastrophes; wars, riots or similar
hostilities; str~kes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control (including the party's
employment fome); the enactment of new laws or restrictions imposed or mandated by other
governmental or quasi-governmental entities preventing this Agreement from being
implemented; litigation involving this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Future Approvals
or the Ministerial Approvals, which directly or indirectly delays any activity contemplated
hereunder, or other causes beyond the party's control. City and Owner shall promptly notify the
other party of any delay hereunder as soon as possible after the same has been ascertained.
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws. If any federal or state law, made or
enacted after the Effective Date prevents or precludes compliance with one or mom provisions of
this Agreement, then the provisions of this Agreement shall, to the extent feasible, be modified
or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such new law. Immediately after enactment or
promulgation of any such new law, City and Owner shall meet and confer in good faith to
determine the feasibility of any such modification or suspension based on the effect such
11231-0001\745445riO.doc 23 ,~ ~
modification or suspension would have on the purposes and intent of this Agreement. Owner
and/or City shall have the right to challenge the new law preventing compliance with the terms
of this Agreement, and in the event such challenge is successful, this Agreement shall remain
unmodified and in full force and effect. At Owner's sole option, the term of this Agreement may
be extended for the duration of the period during which such new law precludes compliance with
the provisions of this Agreement.
L. Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time
by mutual consent of the parties to this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868.
M. Operating Memoranda. The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree
of cooperation between City and Owner and the refinements and further development of the
Project may demonstrate that clarifications are appropriate with respect to the details of
performance of City and Owner. If and when, from time to time, during the term of this
Agreement, City and Owner agree that such clarifications are necessary or appropriate, they shall
effectuate such clarifications through operating memoranda approved by City and Owner, which,
after execution, shall be attached hereto. No such operating memoranda shall constitute an
amendment to this Agreement requiring public notice or hearing. The City Attorney and City
Manager shall be authorized to make the determination whether a requested clarification may be
effectuated pursuant to this Section or whether the requested clarification is of such a character
to constitute an amendment hereof pursuant to Section VII.L. The City Manager may execute
any operating memoranda hereunder without Council action.
11231-0001 \745445vl O.doc 24 ~,l~
SECTION VIII. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Negation of Partnership. The Project constitutes private development, neither
City nor Owner is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and City and Owner
are independent entities with respect to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. None of the
terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or among
the parties in the businesses of Owner, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it cause them to
be considered joint venturers or members of any joint enterprise.
B. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended, nor shall it be
construed, to create any third-party beneficiary rights in any person who is not a party, unless
expressly otherwise provided.
C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire
understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations,
understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or
expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations,
understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to
interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement.
D. Severability. Invalidation of any of the provisions contained in this Agreement,
or of the application thereof to any person, by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any
of the other provisions hereof or the application thereof to any other person or circumstance, and
the same shall remain in full force and effect, unless enfomement of this Agreement, as so
invalidated, would be unreasonable or inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate
the purposes of this Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto.
I 1231-0001\745445v lO.doc '25
E. Constmcti6n of Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement and the Exhibits
hereto shall be construed as a whole according to their common meaning and not strictly for or
against Owner or City and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to achieve the
objectives and purposes. Wherever required by the context, the singular shall include the plural
and vice versa, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neuter genders, or vice
versa.
F. Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for
convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
G. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
H. Notices. Any notice shall be in writing and given by delivering the same in
person or by sending the same by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, with
postage prepaid, by overnight delivery, or by facsimile to the respective mailing addresses, as
follows:
City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Attention: City Manager
Telephone: (909) 477-2700
Facsimile: (909) 477-2849
Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
Attorneys at Law
Number One Civic Center Circle
P. O. Box 1059
Brea, CA 92822-1059
Attention: James L. Markman, Esq.
Telephone: (213) 626-8484
Facsimile: (714) 990-6230
1123 i-0o01 \745445v10.doc 26
Owner: Foothill Crossing LLC.
1161 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 90049
Attention: Michael Lawson
Telephone: (310) 207-8600 ext. 126
Facsimile: (310) 207-2288
Copy to: Law Offices of Richard A. Lawrence
5000 North Parkway Calabasas, Suite 210
Calabasas, California 91302
Attention: Richard Lawrence, Esq.
Telephone: (818) 591-5900
Facsimile: (818) 227-5550
Either City or Owner may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such
change to the other in the manner provided herein at least ten days prior to the date such change
is effected. All notices under this Agreement shall be deemed given, received, made or
communicated on the earlier of the date personal delivery is effected or on the delivery date or
attempted delivery date shown on the return receipt, air bill or facsimile.
I. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and of each and
every term and condition hereof.
J. .Recordation. In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code,
the parties do hereby direct the City Clerk to record a copy of this Agreement against the
Property with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County within ten (10) days after the
Effective Date.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City have executed this Agreement as of the date first
hereinabove written.
"City"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation
By:
Mayor
i 1231-0o01 \745445v 10.doc 27
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Al~proved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
[Signatures continue]
i 1231-0001\745445v 10.doc 28 ~q¢
"Owner"
FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC,
a California limited liability company
By: GMS Holding, Inc.,
a California corporation, its
Managing Member
/~~. Safady
~ It~resident
By:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ~ ~xO~ss'
On \01t39c ,20~oefore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for said_County and State, personally appeared
C_..~ VI. ~ , personally known to me (or
..... ~, ~,;,~L-- c~id~e) to be the perso¢(~ whose name~is/-ar-~-
p,,,,,~,~ t~ ~e cn the b~s;.s ef ........... j
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/the'-} authorized capacity(-i~-), and that by his/~er/the;~r signatureJe~on the instrument
the person~, or the entity upon behalf of which the perso~ acted, executed the within
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/~'~'?..T~. Commis~on~ 124.5311 ·
~ Notay ~- c.~na:~ ~ Notary Public
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
On ,20._, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for said County and State, personally appeared
· personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized.capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the within
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
11231-000 I\745445v9.doc 29 ~q~
EXHIBiT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
[Note: The description of the property listed below is to be replaced with a proper form of legal
description which shall be inserted to replace this page prior to execution and recording of this
Agreement.]
Lot A and Parcels 2 through 13 inclusive as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 16033.
11231-0001\745445vl O.doc Exhibit A
EXHIBIT "B"
LOCATION MAP
11231-0001\745445vl 0.doc Exhibit B s~q~7~
LOCATION MAP
FOOTHILL
LEGEND
Subject Site- Proposed Shopping ~-~-" ; I
EXHIBIT "C"
S1TE PLAN
11231-0001\745445 v lO.doc Exhibit
EXHIBIT "D"
TENTATIVE MAP
I 1231-0001\7454~5vl O.doc Exhibit D x
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 1608~l
BOULEVARD (ROUTE 66)
-- ~ ~ ~ROW '~IGHWAY
THE CITY OF
I~ANCHO CU CAHONGA
DAT~ October 15, 2008
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Regional Center Land Use Mix
Table 111-4 by modifying the land use acreage ranges and the density ranges to
be consistent with the approved Master Plan that is generally bounded by Foothill
Boulevard, Base Line Road, the 1-15 Freeway, and Day Creek Channel. In
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the
CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report
or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00712
to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The General Plan contains a Regional Center Mixed Use Block Table 111-4 as shown in Exhibit
"A." This Mixed Use Block Table specifies the uses and ranges of development for each land
use category by showing the permitted land uses, the range of acreages and percentages for
the permitted land uses and the "most case" dwelling unit scenario (Exhibit "A"). In a review of
the General Plan, staff found that the numbers in the range of units, acreages, and the "most
case" scenario vary from the approved Victoria Arbors and Victoria Gardens Master Plans.
Exhibit "B" is a comparison table for the land use range of acreages, units and the "most case"
scenario. The Planning Commission recommended the following:
a) a reduction in the range of acres for multifamily land from 130-157 acres to 65-80 acres;
b) a reduction in the range of multifamiiy units from 1078-2142 units to 1235-1520 units;
c) a range increase in single family units from 128-256 to 280-942 units;
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 2
c) a range increase in single family units from 128-256 to 280-942 units;
d) no changes to the range of acreages for commercial and public land uses except for the
"most case" scenario, while the right-of-way has a slight reduction in the range of
acreage.
In summary, the acreages and the number of units are shifted from one land use to another but
the total acreage of 510 acres for the entire block remains the same, and the total units for the
"most case" scenario is well within the range. The detailed analysis and explanation of the
changes are contained in the attached September 24, 2003, Planning Commission staff report.
At the meeting of September 24, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
review the proposed changes for the Regional Center Mixed Use Block Table. There was no
public comment. The Planning Commission found that the changes in the ranges of acreages,
units, and the "most case" scenario are a technical maintenance item that would bring the Mixed
Use Table consistent with the approved Master Plans. The Planning Commission also stated
that the new mix in ranges of acreage and units between single-family and multi-family is in
keeping with the City Council long adopted housing policy of a mix of 35 percent multi-family
and 65 percent single-family. The Planning Commission unamiously (4-0-1) recommended
approval of 'the General Plan amendment to the City Council. Copies of the September 24,
2003, Planning Commission staff report and minutes are attached for the Council review.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a one-eighth page legal advertisement in the
inland Vallev DaiIv Bulletin newspaper.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:N~Is
Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Current General Plan Table 111-4
Exhibit "B" Comparison of Current and Proposed Range of Acreage and Units
Exhibit"C" September 24, 2003, Planning Commission Staff Report and
Minutes
Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00712
~G THE COMMUNITY
professional and corporate offices, and other support
commercial uses that do not conflict with the commercial
potential further south along the 1-15 corridor at Fourth Street.
THE REGIONAL CENTER LAND USE MIX
Estimated
Acreage Range "Most Case"
Percent . Density (da/acre) Acres/Dwelling
Units
Land Use ' 225 acres
Commercial - retail, service 20% - 45% 102-230 acres _
commercial, office, toudSt
5% - 12% 26-61 acres 40 acres
performing artS centei, trails,
landscape/bardscepe, public
15%-30% 77-153 acres
14 da/acre2 ~r~
, Medium 6% 32 acres 32 acres
128 to 2 208 (Ju2 .
21%- 36% 107-185 aerse 130 acres
~ - collecto roads 510 acres
lOO%
2~ Indicatea target density, not a range. Actual densay may ~nc,~---,..n- .
of 1 372 dwelling units is not exceeded. .......... ~.~ ,~,,~,~.-~nent occurs midway
'--' tea '---"' dwelling units based o~ historic ~ exper~m~ w,,~ ...... ,- ....
3. Irlalca ~b~L
public parks or privately owned spaces open to'the public '
during normal hours of operation, pedestrian paths and
sidewalks, bikeways, landscape and hardscape areas within
and connecting to public spaces, schools to se~/e residential
uses, and other public facilities necessmy to achieve a well
supported development and assure a high level of amenities.
Residential uses are intended to be an integral part of the
development, rather than separate enclaves iSolated by
arterial highways from the rest of the development. Buffering,
building design and orientation, lighting control, noise control
and other considerations to assure a high standard of
residential quality are expected as part of the design for
integration of uses. The intent is to create a truly
contempora~J urban complex on a par with the best practices
in urban design. A variety of densities and housing types is
envisioned, from multifamily condominiums and apartments to
detached single family residential. Housing types that cater to
the lifestyles of couples and professionals without children are
one example of the emerging market niche that is particularly
~ Page Ili-35
EXHIBIT "B" COMPARISON OF CURRENT & PROPOSED MIXED USE BLOCK
COMM 102-230 225 102-230 169 20-45% 44% 20-45% 33%
PUBLIC 26-61 40 26-61 38 5-12% 8% 5-12% 7%
MF RESl 98 (h)65-80 (f)70 19% 13-17% 14%
1078-2142 1372 1235-1520
SF RESl 32 32 (g)130-157 142 6% 6% 25-31% 28%
128-256 208 780-942
ROW 102-128 115 90-110 91 20-25% 23% 18%-22% 18%
510 510 51(; 51(; 100% 100% 100% 100%
"MOST CASE" assumptions: winery - 5 ac Comm, 5 ac "M", 4 ac winery; Pierotti - 16 ac "LM", 14.25 ac Comm
f) 46.63 ac "H", 18.54 ac "MH" and 5 ac "M"; units: 70 X 19 du/ac
g) Single-family at 6 du/ac
h) Multi-family assumption at 19 du/ac up to an average of 24 du/ac
#) acutal, as proposed, or estimated at mid-range
~nancy~amerbeau\masterplan\rclanduse.mix3.sept03
THE cITY OF
~ANCQO CIJCA~IONGA
StnffRepor
DAT~ September 24, 2003
TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- A request to amend the Regional Center Land Use Mix Table 111-4 by modifying the
land use acreage ranges and the density ranges to be consistent with the approved
development projects within the Regional Center that is generally bounded by Foothill
Boulevard, Base Line Road, 1-15 Freeway, and Day Creek Channel. In accordance
with Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines,
no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative
Declaration is required to be prepared.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this City initiated General Plan Amendment is to bring the land use
densities, and the range of units and acreages in the Regional Center Mixed Use Block Table 111-4
consistent with the actual approved Master Plans.
BACKGROUND: In May 2002, the Planning Commission approved changes to the multi-family
residential development pattern for the planning area west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of
Church Street within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, which is part of the Regional Center Mixed Use
Block. In the review, it was determined that the changes were consistent with the General Plan
because the units and acreages for multi-family development were within the range listed in the
Regional Center Mixed Use Block Table 111-4 and as shown in Exhibit "A." However, staff found that
the units and acreages for single-family, the total residential, and the "most case" scenario from the
Victoria Arbors and Victoria Gardens Master Plans were outside the range, which necessitates a
General Plan Amendment.
.ANALYSIS:
A. Backqround for General Plan Re.qional Center Mixed Use Block: More than three years ago,
the City undertook several major projects. Victoria Arbors Master Plan was proposed to
replace the Victoria Lakes Village of the Victoria Community Plan, followed by the proposed
Victoria Gardens Master Plan while the City was considering a General Plan Update. At that
time, the General Plan Task Force/Subcommittee directed staff and applicants that proposed
land use changes during the General Plan Update would be allowed to proceed and be
reviewed based on their own merit. Both Master Plans were adopted by the City Council in
March 2001 and February 2002, respectively, while the General Plan was adopted in
November 2001. The timing of these major projects led to this consistency adjustment.
I! ti /
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00712 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 24, 2003
Page 2
B. Proposed Chanqes to Re.qional Center Mixed Use Block Table 111-4: This block is generally
bounded by Base Line Road, Etiwanda Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and Day Creek Channel.
It includes the Victoria Gardens and Victoria Arbors Master Plans, the winery parcel, the
Pierotti parcel, and the block within the Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in Exhibit "C." The
land use mix in the Mixed Use Block specifies the uses and ranges of development for each
land use category. The table shows the permitted land uses, the range of acreages and
percentages for the permitted land uses and the "most case" dwelling unit scenario (Exhibit
"A"). The goal is to modify the numbers in Table 111-4 so that the range of units, acreages, and
the "most case" scenario match the approved units and acreages from Victoria Gardens and
Arbors Master Plans as well as the land use assumptions for the Pierotti and winery parcels.
Exhibit "B" shows the comparison of current and proposed range of acreage and units. The
following summarizes the proposed changes to the table:
1. Multi-family Residential (Hi.qh/MediumHiqh/Medium):
· The current range of acreages is between 77 and 153 with a density of
14 dwelling units per acre and the range of units is between 1,078 and 2,142.
The "most case" scenario is 70 acres and 1,372 units.
· The new range of acreages is between 65 and 80, and the new range of units is
between 1,235 and 1,520 with a density of 19 dwelling units per acre. The new
"most case" scenario is 70 acres and 1,330 units. The proposed change in
numbers is based on the potential multi-family development projects within
Victoria Arbors and the 600 units approved for Victoria Gardens.
2. Sinqle-family Residential (Low Medium):
· The current acreage is 32 with a density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The
range of units is between 128 and 256. The "most case" scenario is 32 acres
with a density of 8 dwelling units per acre and 208 units.
· The new range of acreages is between 130 and 157 and no change to the
density range. The new range of units is between 780 and 942. The new "most
case" scenario is 1142 acres and 797 units. The proposed change in numbers is
based on the approved Victoria Arbors, the approved development within
Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the land use assumptions that the Pierotti parcel
could be developed all residential or partially residential and commercial.
3. Total Residential:
· The current range of acreages is between 107 and 185 and the range of units is
between 1,206 and 2,398. The "most case" scenario is 130 acres and 1,580
units.
· The new range of acreages is between 195 and 237 and the range of units is
between 2,015 and 2,462. The new "most case" scenario is 212 acres and 2,127
units.
4. Commercial, Public and Ri.qht-of-Way:
· Thc current range of commercial acreage is between 102 and 230 with the "most
case" soenario at 225 acres. The range of acreages for public use is between 26
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 24, 2003
Page 3
and 61 with the "most case" scenario at 40 acres. The range of right-of-way
acreages is between 102 and 128 with the "most case" scenario at 115 acres.
· No changes would be needed to the range of acreages for the commercial and
public use but the "most case" scenario should be changed to 169 acres for
commercial and 38 acres for public. The new range of acreages for right-of-way
needs to be changed to between 90 and 110 acres with the "most case" scenario
at 91 acres.
C. Percentaqe of S n.qle-family and Multi-family: Current percentage mix of residential land use in
the Regional Center Mixed Use Block is 3/4 multi-family and 1/4 single-family. The new
percentage mix based on the approved Victoria Arbors and Victoria Gardens is more like 1/4
multi-family and 3/4 single-family. The City Council has long adopted a housing policy of a mix
of 35 percent multi-family and 65 percent single-family. Therefore, the proposed changes are
consistent with this policy.
D. Environmental Assessment: On November 17, 2001, the City Council certified the
Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2000061027) for the General Plan
Update as adequate and complete, and adopted Facts and Findings and Overriding
Considerations for approving the General Plan Update. Based on the Initial Study prepared by
the City's Environmental Consultant, LSA Associates, Inc., it was determined that none of the
elements set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) exists and therefore no subsequent or
supplemental Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be
prepared.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a one-eighth page in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation
of approval for DRC2003-00712 to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution.
City Planner
BB:NF~mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Current General Plan Table 111-4
Exhibit "B" Comparison of Current and Proposed Range of Acreage and Units
Exhibit "C" Regional Center Mixed Use Block Area
Exhibit "D" Initial Study/Addendum for Final EIR (No. 2000061027) (Distributed Under
Separate Cover)
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval for DRC2003-00712
Draft City Council Resolution of Approval for DRC2003-00712
Mixed Use
Pierotti
4-6/Acre Etiwanda Specific Plan
Temple Property
Mixed Use
NAP
REGIONAL CENTER MIXED uSE BLOCK
INITIAL STUDY/ADDENDUM
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (DRCaoo3-oo7x2)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department/Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Prepared by:
LSA Associates, Inc.
1650 Spruce Street, Suite 500
Riverside, California 92507
(909) 781-9310
LSA Project No. CRG330
,, LSA
ttf'C
^u~.t ~7, ~oo3,.7/2.
!
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
!
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... !'!
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ....................................................................................... Il-!
I 1.2 pREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION ..................................... - 1
1.3 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY/ADDENDUM ..................... : ................. 1-2
I 1.4 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ......... 14
1.5 CONTACT PERSON ............................................................................................. 1-5
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 2-1
I 2.1 PROJECT Sl'rl~ SETTING .................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS ........................................................ 2-2
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 2-2
I 2.4 PROJECT Srl'l~ AND SI'I'I~ DESCRIPTION ........................................................ 2-3
2.5 PROJECT CHARALTIsRISTICS .......................................................................... 2-3
! 3.0~sTu~Y ................................................................................................................ ~'I
3.1 ENVIRONMI~NTAL CHECKLIST FORM .......................................................... '
3.2 DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I RESPONSES ....................................................................................................... 3-13
4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND REFERENCES ..... .4-1
4.1 LIST OF PREPARERS .......................................................................................... 2-11
I 4.2 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
R:\¢RO330XT^BI~ OF CONTENTSa.doc i ~/~
I
FIGURES AND TABLES
FIGURES
1 - Regional Location ............................................................................................................... 2-4
TABLES 'x ......... 2-1
2.A - The Regional Center Land Use Mi ............................... :..~ .................................... '~ 2
2.B - Regional Center Mixed Use Existing and Proposed Revisions ........................................ '
3.A - Existing Land Uses .......................................................................................................... 3-2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Initial Study/Addendum is an addendum to the previously certified General Plan Update
Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2000061027) certified by the
Rancho Cucamonga City Council on November 17, 2001. These documents, together with all other
technical studies and environmental documents incorporated by reference herein, serve as the
environmental review of the proposed project, as required pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the State and
local CEQA Guidelines.
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State and local CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga is the Lead Agency, and is charged with the responsibility of deciding whether or not to
approve the proposed project (General Plan Amendment as set forth in Section 2.3). As part of the
decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider the potential envh-onmental
effectS that could result from the modification of project analyzed in the previously certified EIR.
1.2 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
On November 17, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the Final EIR for the Rancho
C~camonga General Plan Update. The Final EIR addressed potential impacts associated with an
increase in the number of proposed housing units and residential acreage, an increase in the square
footage and acreage proposed for commercial and indusUial land use designations, an increase in the
area designated for freeway/arterial construction, and an increase in projected population and
employment. In addition, the General Plan Update Final EIR also included a land use change for the
1-15 corridor at Foothill Boulevard (i.e., Regional Center) from Regional Commercial, General
Commercial, Commercial Office, Park and Residential (high, medium-high, medium, and medium-
low density) to mixed-use on approximately 510 acres. The General Plan Update Mixed Use
designation for the site specifically resulted in creation of the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" for
the subject site and includes both the Victoria Gardens and Victoria Abors Village projects, which are
specific development projects for the site. In addition to the General Plan Update EIR, the City
Council during 2000 and 2001 adopted Final EIRs for the Victoria Gardens and Victoria Abors
Village projects as well as amendments to the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific
Plans, which include the "Regional Center Mixed-Use Block." The EIR found that the Update did
not include substantial revisions in land use designations or patterns, and "Regional Center Mixed
Use Block" would provide a more defined mixed-use designation. This Amendment does not expand
the size of the 510-acre "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" site, but only revises the range of land
use acreage and densities with the Block. This Amendment makes no changes to existing General
Plan goals or policies.
The General Plan Update Final EIR determined, after mitigation, the adoption of the General Plan
would have the following significant and unavoidable environmental impacts:
R:~CRG330XSection 1 a.doc (08/26/03)
· Soils and Geology (Farmlands and Aggregate Resources);
· Air Quality (construction-related impacts and long-term operational impacts [i.e., vehicle
emissions]);
· Noise (long-term and operational);
· Public Services and Utilities (library services); and
· Aesthetics and Visual Resources.
The General Plan Final EIR was certified as accurate, adequate, and complete and Facts and Findings
and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted. Impacts to soils were found to be a
result of the conversion of farmland to urban uses and the elimination of existing aggregate mining
operations at Day and/or Deer Creek prior to the depletion of the aggregate resource. Impacts to air
quality were found to be a result of dally construction emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), reactive
organic compounds (ROC), and particulate matter (PM~o) being in excess of South Coast Ah- Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) daily and quarterly threshold levels. Additionally, vehicle
emissions from the increased development allowed by the General Plan were found to exceed the
established SCAQMD pollutant thresholds. Noise impacts were found to be a result of the increased
traffic volumes on certain roadways that would equal or exceed the allowable 5dBA Community
Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) increase in noise levels above existing levels. Library impacts were
found to be a result of an increase in patrons both from within the City and the area currently outside
the City limits. Also, no planned library facilities were to be located within the Planning Area, which
was reviewed during the General Plan Update. Impacts to aesthetics and visual resource were found
to be the result of the alteration of open space views in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Sphere of
Influence area.
The City Council adopted Statements of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the
General Plan Update on November 17, 2001. These Findings found the economic, social, or other
benefits of the General Plan Update and its alternatives outweighed the significant and unavoidable
impacts identified in the Final EIR. In making this finding, the Council balanced the benefits of the
General Plan Update and its alternatives against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its
willingness to accept those adverse impacts.
1.3 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY/ADDENDUM
Pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, this Initial
Study/Addendum has been prepared in order to determine whether adoption of the General Plan
Amendment for the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" project (proposed project) will result in a
change in circumstances, new impacts, or new information of substantial importance requiring the
preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR.
This addendum reviews any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could
not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified. It
further examines whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, preparation of a
subsequent or supplemental EIR is required. This examination includes an analysis of the provisions
of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and their applicability
1-2
R 5CRG330~Secton la.doc (08/26/03)
to the proposed project. The focus of the examination is on whether the Final E]R adequately
addresses the impacts associated with development of the proposed project.
Pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Guidelines, the City's
environmental review of the proposed project is limited to examining the environmental effects
associated with the changes between the previously certified Final EIR and the potential impacts that
may result from implementation of the proposed project. This focus is due to the fact that the Final
EIR has already addressed the environmental impacts associated with development of the proposed
project and that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified that the Final EIR was adequate and
met the provisions of CEQA.
Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared "if
some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162
calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Section 15162 of the State CEQA
Guidelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent EIR. A proposed change
in a project will require preparation of a subsequent EIR if:
1. The change in the project is substantial. Substantial changes in the project are those that
would require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects, or if a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects has occurred.
2. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken have substantially changed.
Substantial changes in circumstances are those defined as those that would require major
revisions of the previous EIR in order to describe and analyze new significant environmental
effectS, or any changes that would cause a substantial increase in the severity of the
previously identified significant effectS.
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could have not been
known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified,
shows;
A. The project will have one or more significant effectS not discussed in the previous
EIR;
B. The significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
identified in the previous EIR;
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to he feasible would in fact
he feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or
alternatives; or
D. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation
measures or alternatives.
R:,,CRG330~Section I a.doc (08/26/03)
If none of the above conditions is met, the City is not permitted to require preparation of a subsequent
EIR. Rather, the City may require preparation of a Mitigated Ne. gati.ve Declaration or an Addendum,
or the City may decide that no further environmental documentation ~s necessary.
This Initial Study/Addendum has evaluated each of the issues addressed in the Final EIR, as well as
each of the issues contained in the checklist presented in Section 3.0 of this document. Based on this
analysis and the information contained herein, there is no evidence that the proposed project requires
major changes to the Final EIR Comparison of the previous project with the proposed project, as
described in Section 2.3 of this document. There are no new significant environmental impacts
associated with implementation of the proposed project.
This Initial Study/Addendum relies on use of an Environmental Checklist Form (Form), as suggested
in Section 15063 (d)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Form is used:
· To evaluate whether or not there are any new or more severe significant environmental effects
associated with implementation of the proposed project; and
· To review whether there is new information or circumstances that would require preparation of
additional environmental documentation in the form of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, or if
an Addendum is appropriate.
Section 3.0 of this document contains the Checklist Form and explains the basis for each response to
the questions on the Form-
1.4 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines permits an environmental document to incorporate by
reference other documents that provide relevant data.
The documents outlined in this section are hereby incorporated by reference, and the pertinent
material is summarized throughout this Initial Study/Addendum, where that information is relevant to
the analysis of impacts of the project. All documents incorporated by reference is available for
review at City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department.
· City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Adopted November 17, 2001.
· Final Environmental Impact Report Victoria Arbors Village SCH No. 98041137, LSA
Associates, Inc., May 20, 1999.
· Addendum for the Victoria Arbors Village Project (SCH No. 98041137), LSA Associates, Inc.,
December 20, 2000.
Final Environmental Impact Report Victoria Gardens Project (SCH No. 2001031028), LSA
Associates, Inc., September 21, 2001.
R:\CRG330~Section la.doc (08/26/03)
1.5 CONTACT PERSON
The Lead Agency for the Initial Study/Addendum for the General Plan Amendment (DRC2003-
00712) project is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Any questions about the preparation of this Initial
Study/Addendum, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to the following:
Nancy Fong, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
(909) 477-2750
R:\CRG330~eaion 1 a.doc (08~26/03)
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT SITE SETTING
The proposed project consists of an amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use
Element. In particular, the proposed project is an amendment to the Mixed Use Regional Center
Land Use, Table ]II-4 (The Regional Center Land Use Mix) of Chapter m (Developing the
Community) (shown here as Table 2.A). The Regional Center represents the City's most complex
mixed-use development and its intent is to:
· Achieve a powerful commercial magnet within the region;
Create a unique urban village;
· Establish a City and regional landmark of visual excellence; and
· Include a performing arts/entertainment center of regional significance.
Table 2.A - The Regional Center Land Use Mix
~ Estimated "Most Case"
Land Use Percent Range · Acreage Range
· Density (du/acre) Acres/Dwelling Units (du)
Commercial - retail,
service, commercial, 20% - 45% 102-230 acres 225 acres
office, tourist
commercial. .. ~
PublicYQua~i-Public
- performing arts 40 acres
center, u'ails, 5% - 12% 26-61 acres
landscape/hardscape,
ublic s aces ~~ ~ 98 acres @
Residential 77-153 acres @
15% - 30% 14 du/acre2 14 du/aere2
1,078 to 2,142 du 1,372 du
~ ~- 32 acres 32 acres @
Residential - Low 8 du/acre
dedium 6% 4-8 dtOaere
208 du3
128 to 256 du
~ 107-185 acres 130 acres
~ 21% - 36% 1,206 to 2,398 du 1,580 du
Rights-of-Way - 20% - 25% 102-128 acres 115 acres
collector/local roads ~ ~ 510 acres
100% 510 acres
Totals
The acreage in this category also includes land for local park and school purposes.
2 Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 dtOac as long as *he total of 1,372 dwelling unitS is not
exceeded. .
3 Indicates tmget dwelling unitS based on historic city experience where development occurs rmdway between 50 and 75% of the range.
R 5CRG330k~ection 2a.dec (08/26t03) ~,~
Sep-16-03 02:22pm ~rom-L$~ ^ssociates 6007814277 T-622 ?.002/002 F-279
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
The proposed project requix~ the following apg,,~eal by the City of Rancho Cuc~aonga
· Al)_o~oval of General Plan Ameaduwat (DRC2003-00712)
23 PROJECT DESCRHrrlON
As previonsIy stated, '.he proposed project consi~ of an amenam~nt to th~ "P~ional C~ter Land
Use Mix in the (~y's ~ Plan. In particular the amc-mim~nt revi.~s the residential
(high/medium high/imxllum) av~ago range; residential (low-medium) u~cage and dwelling unit
ran_ge; total residen6.1 acrca~ and dwelling unit range; and d~'ease$ a~d increases the Estimated
Most acreages and/~ dwelling unit scemglos as shown in Table 2.B.
Table 2.B - Reginmd Center Mh~,d Use Rxls~g and Proposed Revisions
I ~ml Use Pea'~ent · Aca~age ~ Carr~nt'~.,eaeral New G~neral Plan
Range . Density (da/ac) Plaa Estimated ~ost Rsiimated Most
Commerckd 20-45~ 102-230 acres 225 ~ 169 aci~
Public $-12~ 26-61 acta 40 acres 38 aa-cs
P~/d~zuia/- 77-153 ac~s ~ 14 du/ac~e 98 acres ~ 14 clu/acr~ 70 acres @
(high/medium 1~-30~ 19 du/acr~
Jai~ ~/,~--~ium) 1.078-2,142 du 1,~72 gu 1,330 du
R~fd~ial- low 32 ~ 32 acres ~ 8 cb.~:re
medimn 6% 4-8 du/a~ 208 du
128-256 du 797
Total r~id~ntial 107-185 ac~s 130 acres
21-36%
1,206-2~95 gu 1580 du 2 127 d..u
~ Rt~hl.~-of-Way 20-25% 102-128 ~ 111~ ~ 91 ac~s
Tolals 100~, $10 acr~ $10 ~ 510 acres
The propos~ ~visi~ms well anlead th~ Re~onal Center Mixed Us~ Cedar sit~ by decreasing the
G-~nmal Plan "Estimated Most" proj~ion to 169 acres for commel~al development, cleca~..asiag thc
pubic facilities "F.~ Most" proj~don to 38 ac~'~s, decreasing the r~sidemlal (high, medittm
high, and medium) "F..~,~-~,~cl Most' d~velopm~m I~iion ~o 70
"F_.~ma~ed Most" ~id~ntial (high, medinm high, aad medium) dwe]liag ~mlt pro.~ctio~l tO 1.,330
units, iac~asing the acr~ag~ range to a maximum of 142 acres for rosidea~ial (low-d~asity).
inc'r~sing the "F_~mated Mosf' projected ~sid~mtial 0ow-densixy) dwelli~g ~ to 797 unlt~, and
~g the ~ and "Es~ MOSC for Righ~-of-Way to 91 acces. How~var,
number of dwelling units ~sults ia only a n~ inciv, ase of 64 dwelling units abovo th~ ~o~al numbea-
unks for th~ top o~ the rasid~tial range, in additioa the total aor~g~ of the "Rcgioaul Centex Mixed
U~e Block"' remains tmchanged al 510 aca~s.
The proposad tnoj~/planning ar~a is located within the City of Rancho Cucamo~ga- The City is
located ia the southwe~erly ix~tloa o~ San B~m~dlao County approximately 1-~ mil~ we~ of. the
2-2
~,,-~CS~,c~d ~ Z~.d ~ {OWl(YQ.~) 32/
I City of San Bemardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, the City of Fontana to
the east, the City of Ontario to the south, and the City of Upland to the west. The regional location of
I the City is delineated in Figure 2.1 (Regional Location) and the "Regional Center Mixed Use Bloc
is delineated in greater detail. The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" is approximately 510 acres.
The site is located at the northeast comer of the Foothill Boulevard and the Day Creek Flood Control
I Channel. Interstate 15 (1-15) is located on the easterly boundary of the project/planning area. Rancho
Cucamonga City Hall is located approximately 2V2 miles to the west and the Ontario Intemational
i Airport is located approximately 3~ miles to the southwest.
2,4 PROJECT SITE AND SITE DESCRIPTION
I The proposed "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" would be developed on a site that is
approximately 510 acres in area. The site is bounded by Baseline Road to the north, Etiwanda
Avenue and 1-15 to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south and the Day Creek Flood Control
I Channel to the west. A large portion of the project site was approved with two development projects.
Victoria Arbors Master Plan is a mixed-use development with approval fur 555 single-family lots,
25.63 acres of commercial development, 46.63 acres of multifamily development, a 10-acre
I elementa~ school, and a 7-acre park. Victoria Gardens is a mixed-use regional mall and is approved
for 2.45 million square feet of retail, entertainment, service, and office uses, a cultural/library center,
and up to 600 residential units. The project site is rough graded for the two master plan development
I projects where major streets (such as Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Park Lane, and
Base Line Road) are being consmacted. House products are approved fur Tract 15974 and
construction has begun. In addition to the two master plan development projects, the project site
I contains 30.25 acres of vacant land zoned as Regionally Related Commercial, a 14-acre winery, a
9-acre banquet facility, 71 existing homes, and 20 acres of vacant land approved for 61 homes.
I Historically, portions of the project site have been used for agricultural purposes (it is currently an
abandoned vineyard). Portions of the site are crossed by various Southern California Edison
easements and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel is located on the easterly boundary of the site.
The project site is designated "Mixed Use" on the City's General Plan Land Use Map, and on the
I zoning map.
I 2.5 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
This Initial Study addresses potential impacts associated with implementation of the project within
approved Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element designation of "Mixed
I the previously . ,,
Use" and in particular the "Regional Center M~xed Use Block. The proposed project consists of an
amendment to the "Mixed Use" Land Use designation that modifies the acreage and density ranges.
I During the time the City was conducting hearings on the General Plan Update, it was also processing
specific development projects with their own Environmental Impact Reports on portions of the site
(e.g., Victoria Gardens and Victoria Arbors Village), which established their own development
acreages and densities. The General Plan Update was adopted on November 17, 2001, and shortly
I before the Victoria Gardens and Victoria Pabors Village projects were adopted. Thus, this General
Plan is clerical in nature (a clean-up action) to allow for consistency of the approved development
i projects with the General Plan.
City of San Bemardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, the City of Fontana to
the east, the City of Ontario to the south, and the City of Upland to the west. The regional location of
I the City is delineated in Figure 2.1 (Regional Location) and the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block"
is delineated in greater detail. The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" is approximately 510 acres·
i The site is located at the northeast comer of the Foothill Boulevard and the Day Creek Flood Control
Channel. Interstate 15 (I-15) is located on the easterly boundary of the project/planning area. Rancho
Cucamonga City Hall is located approximately 2% miles to the west and the Ontario Imemational
I Airport is located approximately 3~6 miles to the southwest.
I 2.4 PROJECT SITE AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" would be developed on a site that is
approximately 510 acres in area. The site is bounded by Baseline Road to the north, Etiwanda
I Avenue and 1-15 to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south and the Day Creek Flood Control
Channel to the west. A large portion of the project site was approved with two development projects.
Victoria Arbors Master Plan is a mixed-use development with approval for 555 single-family lots,
25.63 acres of commercial development, 46.63 acres of multifamily development, a 10-acre
elementary school, and a 7-acre park. Victoria Gardens is a mixed-use regional mall and is approved
for 2.45 million square feet of retail, entertainment, service, and office uses, a cultural/library center,
iand up to 600 residential units. The project site is rough graded for the two master plan development
projects where major streets (such as Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Park Lane, and
Base Line Road) are being constructed. House projects are approved for Tract 15974 and
construction has begun. In addition to the two master plan development projects, the project site
I contains 30.25 acres of vacant land zoned as Regionally Related Commercial, a 14-acre winery, a
9-acre banquet facility, 71 existing homes, and 20 acres of vacant land approved for 61 homes.
I Historically, portions of the project site have been used for agricultural purposes (it is currently an
abandoned vineyard). Portions of the site are crossed by various Southern California Edison
easements and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel is located on the easterly boundary of the site.
I The project site is designated "Mixed Use" on the City's General Plan Land Use Map, and on the
zoning map.
i 2.5 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
This Initial Study addresses potential impacts associated with implementation of the project within
I' the previously approved Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element designation of "Mixed
· ock"
Use" and in particular the "Regional Center Mtxed Use BI . The proposed project consists of an
amendment to the "Mixed Use" Land Use designation that modifies the acreage and density ranges.
! During the time the City was conducting hearings on the General Plan Update, it was also processing
specific development projects with their own Environmental impact Reports on portions of the site
(e.g., Victoria Gardens and Victoria Arbors Village), which established their own development
acreages and densities. The General Plan Update was adopted on November 17, 2001, and shortly
before the Victoria Gardens and Victoria Arbors Village projects were adopted. Thus, this General
Plan is clerical in nature (a clean-up action) to allow for consistency of the approved development
I projects with the General Plan.
I R:~CRG330xSection 2a.doc (08/2003) 2 -,~,,~,~
Bernardino
.4ngeles National
National ~ Forest
/
PROJECT
LOCATION
~ L.._ '-'
Rancho
Cucamonga
Ontario
Los
~4ngeles
County
San
Bernardino
· County
~ ~ ,~/' Riverside
Orange
County
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment
Initial Study Addendum
Regional Location
R:XCRG 330'G raphics~J $\'°c"ti°n'¢dr (8/25/03)
3.0 INITIAL STUDY
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
The following pages contain the Environmental Checklist Form (Form) for the proposed project. The
Form is marked with findings as to the environmental effects of the project. A checked box in
columns 1, 2, or 3 shall require additional environmental analysis in the form of a supplemental or
subsequent EIR. A checked box in columns 4, 5, or 6 shall, require preparation of a mitigated
negative declaration, a negative declaration, or an addendum.
As explained in Section 1.0, this analysis has been undertaken, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA,
to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the factual basis for determining, based on the
information available, the form of environmental documentation the project warrants. The basis for
each of the findings listed in the attached Form is explained in Section 3.2, Environmental Analysis
and Explanation of Checklist Responses.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element Amendment (Retail Center
Mixed Use Block/
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department/Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner (909) 477-2750
4. Project Location: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use
7. Zoning: Mixed Use
8. Description of the Project: The project is an amendment to the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block"
portion of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element. The amendment will modify the
acreage and density ranges to include 180 acres of commerdial, 48 acres of public uses, 65 acres of
"Medium, "Medium-High," and "High" density residential, 181 acres of "Low-Medium" density
residential, and 36 acres of rights-of-way.
R :\CRG330~ectic~3.revl a.d oc (08/26/03)
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Surrounding land uses are designated "Low Medium
Residential," "Neighborhood Commercial," and "Hood Control" by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Existing land use in the area is primarily residential, commercial, and vacant. The nearest residential
land uses (Table 3.A) are primarily located irranediately to the north of the site of this General Plan
Amendment.
Table 3.A - Existing Land Uses
Direction from
Project Site General Plan Designation Zoning Designation Land Use
Low Medium Density Low Medium Density Vacant
North Residential Residential Residential
Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Commercial
Low Medium Density Low Medium Density
Residential Residential Vacant
East Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial
Commercial General Commercial
Office Office
South General Commercial General Commercial Vacant
Flood Control
West Flood Control Flood Control Channel
10. Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing approva~ or participation
agreement): The following list is not exhaustive, and contains the approvals and permits that may be
necessary based on the best available dam at the time the Initial Study was prepared.
· City of Rancho Cucamonga - Adoption of Initial Study/Addendum.
· City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment.
Determination: (to be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[]The City finds that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The City finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] The City finds the proposed project may have a significant effect(s) on thc environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described
on attached sheets. If the effect is a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless
mitigated an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to addressed.
[] The City finds that changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project would be
undertaken require major revisions to the previous EIR in order to make the previous EIR adequately
apply to the proposed project in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
Guidelines Section 15163. Thus, a SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared.
The City finds that changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project would be
undertaken require only minor revision to the previous EIR in order to make the previous EIR
adequately apply to the proposed project in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166
and CEQA Guidelines Section 15163. Thus, a SUPPLEMENTAL EIR shall be prepared.
· The City finds that the significant effects that would result from the proposed project have been
addressed in an earlier EIR, and that none of the determinations set forth in Public Resources Code
Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 can be established. Thus, an ADDENDUM
to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan FEIR shall be prepared.
Signature Date
Title Agency
I ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
Le~s than
Information New Information Significant
I Substantial Substantial Showing Showing Ability lmpac~No
Change in Change in Greater to Reduce, bu! Change~ or No
Project Circumstance Significant not Eliminate Information Impact
ISSUES: Requiring Requiting
Major EIR Major EIR Effects than Significant Requiring
~-evious Effects in
Revisions Revisions ~ Previous EIR of an E1R
1. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
I a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a [] [] [] r~ · []
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic [] [] [] [] [] ·
resources, including, but not limited to, t~eas,
I rock ouan-oppings, and historic buildings
within n state .scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing [] [] [] [] · []
visual character or quality of the site and its
I surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial []. [] [] n · []
light or glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
I AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are signifi~.~uJt
2.
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model
(1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
Iagriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, 'Unique [] [] [] [] [] ·
Farmland. or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), es shown on the maps
I prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping
and Monitoring Program of the California
Resourcus Agency. to non-agricultural use?
I b) Con. Ct with existing zoning for [] ~3 [] [] El ·
agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing ~ [] [] [] [] ·
environment which, due to their location or
I could result in conversion of Farmland,
nature,
to non-agricultural use?
3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or ~
Ipollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations, Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct [] [] [] [] [] ·
implementation of the applicable air quality
I plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] [] · []
contdbute substantially m an existing or
i projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable [] [] [] [] · []
net increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an
I applicable Federal or State ambient ai~' quality
standard (including releasing emissions that
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
I Le~s than
Information New Information Significant
Substantial Substantial Showing Showing Ability Impact/No
Change in Change in Greater to Reduce, but Changes or No
I Project Circumstance Signifiemat notEliminat~ Information Impact
ISSLTF~: Requiring R~quiring
Major EIR Major EIR Effects tha~ Significant Requiting
Previous Effects in Preparafio~
Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EI~ of an
I d) Expose sensitive receptors to [] [] [] ct [] ·
substantial pollutant concenti'afions?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting [] Ct Ct [] · []
I a substantial number of people?
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, C} Ct [] r~ [] ·
I either directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
I the California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on Ct [] [] [] Ct ·
I any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department offish and Game or U.S. Fish and
IWildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on Ct [] ca [] [] ·
federally protected wetlands as defined by
i Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,
but not ]imitod to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling.
hydrological intemlpfion, or other means?
I d) Interfere substantially with the [] [] [] [] [] ·
movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
I or impede the use of native wildlife nurseD'
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or [] [] Ct [] [] ·
I ordinances protecting biological resoorces,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an [] r~ [] [] [] ·
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
I Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
I $. CULTURAl, RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] [] · Ct
the significance of an historical resource as
defined in
I b) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] Ct · Ct
the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.57
!
Less than
Information New Information Significant
Substautial Substantial Showiug Showing Ability lmpactBqo
Change in Change in Greater to Reduce, but Changes or No
Project Circumstance Significant not Eliminata Information Impact
ISSUES: R~quiring Requiring
Major EIR Major EIR Effects than Significant Requiring
Ptevions Effects in
Preparation
Revisions Revisions £IR Previous EIR of an EIR
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a El ~n [] D · []
unique paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
d) Dislurb any human remains, o r~ [] [] · []
including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people ur structures to
potential substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known [] [] [] [] · []
earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Ptio]o Earthquake Fan]t Zoning
Map issued by the Stale Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) SU-ong seismic ground [] [] [] [] · []
shaking?
iii) Seismic-related g~ound [] El [] [] · []
failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? D [] [] [] · []
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or [] [] [] [] · []
the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil [] [] [] [] · []
that is unstable, or that would become unstable
as a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse7
d) Be located on expansive soil, as El [] [] r~ · []
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Cede (1994), creating substantial risks
to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately [] [] [] 0' [] ·
supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of wastewater?
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the [] El [] [] · []
public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
lnfonnatio~ New Information
Less
than
Substantial Substantial Showing Showing Ability Significant
lmpa¢CNo
Change in Change iu Greater to Reduce, but Changes or No
Project Circumstance Significant aotEliminate Information lmpact
ISSIJW--~: Requiring Requiting
Major E1R Major EIR Effects than Significant Requiting
Previous Effects in
Prepara6on
Revisions Revisions EIR Previous E~, of an EIR
Create significant h~zard to the [] [] [] [] [] ·
b)
a
public or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the envh'oranent?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle [] [] [] [] [] ·
hazardous or acutely h~,ardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included [] [] [] [] [] ·
on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Govemmeat Code Section 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
For a project located within an airport [] [] [] [] [] ·
e)
land use plan or where such a plan has not been
adopted within two miles of a public ah-port or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area7
f) For a project within the vicinity of a [] [] [3 [] ra ·
private airstrip, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or [] c~ [] [] [] ·
physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation p]en?
h) Expose peop]e or s~uctores to a [] i3 C] [] [] ·
risk of loss, injury or death
significant
involving wildlaad fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
8. ItYDROLOG¥ AND WATER QIJALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards [] [] 12 [] · []
or waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete ~oundwater [] [] [] [] · []
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the ]ecal ~-oundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells
would drop to a level which would not supporl
existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have b~en granted)?
R :~,CRG 330~ecfi on3 .rev 1 a.do~ (08/26~03) 3-7J~/
!
I
I Substantial Substantial Information New Information Less than
Significant
Showing Showing Ability Impac~'qo
Change in Change in Great~ to Reduce, but Changes or No
Project Circumztance Significant not Eliminate Information Impact
ISSUES: Requiting Requiring Effect~ than Significant
Maj.- EIR Major EIR Previous Effects in Requiring
Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR of an EIR
I C) Substantially alter the existing [] [] [] [] · []
drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream
I or river, in a manner dim would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantiafly alter the existing D [] [] [] · []
i drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteredoo of the course of a su'eam
or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner that
iwould result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water that r~ [] [] [] · r~
would exceed die capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
I provide substantial additional sources of
polluted mnofl~
f) Odienvise substantially degrade [] [] [] [] · []
Iwater quality?
g) Place housing within a lO0-year D [] [] El [] ·
flood hazard a~ea as mapped on a federal Flood
i Hazard Boonda~J or Flood Insurance Rate Map
or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a ]00-year flood hazard [] [] [] [] [] ·
area structures that would impede or redirect
Iflood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a [] [] t2 [] [] ·
significant risk of loss, injory or death
I involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Expose people or structures to [] [] [] [] · []
inundation by seiche, tsunami, m- mudflow?
I 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established [] [] [] [] [] ·
community?
I b) Conflict with any applicable ]and use [] [] [] [] · []
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
I limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
I c) Conflict with applicable habitat [] [] El [] [] ·
any
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
I
Substaufial Substantial hformafion New Information Less than
Chauge in Chauge in Sho~ing Showing Ability Significant]mpacffNo
Project Circumstance Greater to Reduce, but Challges or No
ISSU]gS: R~quiring Requiting Significant not Eliminate Information lmpact
Major EIR Major E1R Effects thanSignificant Requiting
Previous Effects in
Preparation
Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR of an EIR
10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a [] [] '~ ca ca ·
known mineral resource that would be of value
to the region and the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a Ca Ca r~ [] [] ·
locally important mineral resource recoveo, site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
11. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation r~ ca [] ca · ca
of noise levels excess standards
in
of
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agendes?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation [] ca tn rn · []
of excessive ground borne vibration or grot)nd
borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent inerease in [] Ca [] [] · Ca
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the projecl?
d) A substanfiai or periodic Ca Ca Ca [] · []
increase in ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located wifffin an airport [] Ca [] [] [] ·
land use plan or where such a plan has not been
adopted within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a Ca r~ Ca Ca Ca ·
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth Ca Ca ca r~ · Ca
in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g.,
through extension of roads or other
infi'astmcture)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of Ca [] ca [] [] ·
existing housing, necessitating the consffuedon
of replacement housing elsewhere?
R:\CRG330~¢ction3.rcvl a.doc (08F26/03) 3-9
Less than
Substantial Substantial Information New Informalion Significant
Showing Showing Ability lmpac~lo
Change in Change in Greater to Reduce, but Changes or No
Project Circumstance Significimt no:Eliminate Information Impact
ISSUES: Requiting Requiring
Major EIR Major EIR Effects than Significant Requiring
Previous Effects in
I~'eparation
Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR of an E1R
C) Disp]aca substantial numbers of [] [] [] [] []
·
people, necessitating the consU-action of
replacement housing elsewhere?
13. PUBLIC - project:
SERVICES
Would
the
a) Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any
of the public services:
i) Fire protection? [] [] [] [] · r~
ii) Police proU,'ction? [] iD [] O · []
iii) Schools? [] [] [] [] [] ·
iv) Parks? [] O [] 0 [] ·
v) Other public facilities? [] [] o [] · []
14. RECREATION - Would the project:
Increase the of existing [] [] [] [] O ·
a)
use
neighborhood and regional parks or other
reo'eational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or [] [] [] C3 [] ·
require the consU'oction or expansion of
recreational facilities that might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the pmjoct:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is [] [] [] [] · []
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or [] [] D [] · 0
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the County congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
Result in a change in air traffic [] [] [] [3 · 13
c)
patterns, including either an increase in traffic
levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
I~s than
Information New Information Significant
Substantial Substantial Showing Showing Ability lmpa¢~lo
Chaagc in Change in Greate~ to Reduce, hat Changes or No
Project Circumstance Significant not Eliminate lnforrnatlon lmpact
ISSUES: Requiring Requiting
Maj~ EBb, Major EIR Effects than Significant Requiring
Previous Effects in
Revisioas Rex4sions EIR Previous EIR Preparatinn
of an EIR
d) Substantially increase hazards due to [] [] [] rn · []
a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency [] [] r~ [] · []
access?
f) Result in inadequate parking D [] [] [] [] ·
capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, D [] [] r~ [] ·
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
Exceed wastewater treatment [] [] [] [] · []
a)
requirements of the applicable Regional Water
Quality ConU'ol Board?
b) Require or result in the construction [] [] [] [] ·
of new water or wastewarer txeatment facilities
or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction [] [] [] [] · []
of new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facililies, the consmmtian
of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies [] ~2 [] [] · []
available to serve the project from existing
entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitiements needed?
c) Result in a determination by the D [] [] [] · []
wastcwater treatment provider who serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Bc served by a landfill with sufficient [] [] [] [] · []
peratitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local [] [] [] [] ·
statutes and regulations rclatad to solid waste?
Information New Information Less than
Subslanlial Substsntial Showing ShowingAbilily Significant
hnpacONo
Cha~ge in Change in Greater to Reduce, but Changes or No
Project Circumstance Sig~ificaar nc~Elimiaan: Information Impact
ISSUES: Requiring Requiring
Major EIR Major EIR Effects than Si~ificam Requiring
Previous Effects ia
Revisions Revisions EIR Prtvious EIR Preparatiaa
of an EIR
17. MANDATORY FINDIJ~GS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a). POTENTIAL TO DEGRADE: Does [] [] []
the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistmy?
b). CUMULATIVE IMPACTS: Does [] [] D [] · []
the Ixoject have impac~ that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively comiderable" means that the
incremental effect~ of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of p~t I~ojects, the effects of other
onn'ent projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
c) ADVERSE IMPACTS ON [] [] [] [] · []
HUMANS: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, el~
thar directly or indirectly?
18. DEPARTM]gNT OF FISH AND GAME 'DE MINIMUS' FINDING
a) Wil/ the project have an adverse [] [] [] [] [] ·
effect either individually or cumulatively, on
fish and wildlife resonl'ces? Wildlife shall be
defined for the parpose of this question as "all
wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians,
and related ecological communities, including
the habitat upon which the wildlife depends for
its continued viability."
19. EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EJR, or other CEQA p~oenss, one or more effects have
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration (Section 15063[c][3][D]).
Victoria Gardens Draft Environmental Impact Report, L.gA, September 21, 2001
· Victoria Abors Village Final E]R State Clearinghouse No. 98041137, ce~ified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on
July 7, 1999
· Vict~riaAb~rsVillage~nitial$tudy/Addendum~certifiedasadequatebytheCity~fRanch~Cucam~nga~nDecember
20, 2000.
· Rancho Cucamonga Final Environmental Impact Report, Michael Brandman Associate, Novembar 17, 2001.
I
!
3.2 DISCUSSION OF TIlE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
RESPONSES
I The following Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form substantiation provides a summary of the
findings of the FEI[R; provides a comparison between the approved environmental impacts identified
I i
n the FEIR and the impacts that may result from development of the Regional Mixed Use Block.
1. Aesthetics - Would the Project:
I a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
Community Design Element's "View and Corridors Section" of the City's General Plan states that
i views and visual corridors are generally oriented in a north-to-south alignment. The proposed on-site
uses will be required to be designed and constructed in a manner consistent with the applicable
design/development guidelines as contained in the project Master Plan. Additionally, all new
i construction is subject to the review and approval by the City's Design Review Board. Compliance
with the design/development guidelines and review by the Design Review Board will ensure that
future development of the site will comply with applicable provisions of the Master Plan; therefore,
I potential impacts from future development of the site will be less than significant. Potential impacts
associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
i b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
I No Impact. No scenic resources including, but not limited, to Ixees, rock outcroppings, or historic
buildings exist on and/or adjacent to the site; therefore, no scenic resources will be impacted with the
development of this site. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no
more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
I warranted.
e) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
I surroundings?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Future
I development of the site will noticeably alter the visual character of the site. The City of Rancho
Cucamonga has zoned the project site "Mixed Use." Appropriate development/design guidelines are
contained in the Victoria Community Plan and the City's Development Cede. All new construction is
i subject to review and approval by the City's Design Review Board, who will be responsible for
ensuring that the operation and construction of the on-site land uses is consistent with all applicable
design guidelines. Thus, any impacts to the visual character or quality of the site will have a less than
significant effect on the environment. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
I Amendment no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
are
additional analysis is warranted.
I
I
I 7
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation
of
an
EIR.
Currently, the project site is generally undeveloped. A winery is located in the north-central portion
of the site and development of the site will introduce additional lighting into the area; however, the
of will be subject to the City's lighting guidelines and/or
design,
installation,
and
operation
lighting
standards. As a result of the existing General Plan designation, it is anticipated that lighting will be
provided for public safety and convenience purposes at the time of development and no new
significant lighting sources will be necessary at the time of new construction. The overall land area
subject to development remains unchanged; however, additional commercial and residential uses may
be constructed on the site. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no
more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The Draft General Plan EIR included Mitigation Measures AES-1 through AES-11 to mitigate for
aesthetic and visual impacts.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts
associated
with
the
General
Plan
Amendment.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new significant aesthetic impacts that may be caused by
implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final E1R.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate a
new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information and
analysis above, them is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant impact
requiring major revision of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
No significant aesthetic impacts am anticipated to result as a result of the implementation of this
General Plan Amendment; therefore, there is no need to analyze whether additional mitigation
I
!
!
measures are available that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant effects identified
in the FEIR.
!
2. Agricultural Resources - Would the Project:
I a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Importance
Statewide
(farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the farmland mapping and
monitoring program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
I No Impact. The project site is designated as a site of Statewide Important Farmland. However, the
site is not currently used for agricultural purposes and has been designated on the City's General Plan
I and the Victoria Community Plan for "mixed use" type development. The overall land area
designated for future mixed use development is the same as previously analyzed in the General P1an
Update and Community Plan. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no
more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
I warranted.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
I No Impact. The project site is zoned "Mixed Use," there are no active agricultural uses occurring on
the site, and it is not located within a Williamson Act contract area; therefore, no impacts related to
i this issue will occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more
significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
I c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion o f farmland to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. The site has been designated for regional commercial uses since adoption of the City's
I General Plan in 1981 and subsequently revised to "Mixed Use"
in
the
2001
General
Plan
Update.
No
other farmlands will be impacted by future development of the site because the mixed-use nature of
the General Plan and Community Plan designations will not create a demand for more commercial or
Iresidential development. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no
more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
I
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
I The FEIR did. not include mitigation measures regarding agricultural resources because no
any
significant impacts were identified.
I Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new agriculture related impacts associated with the proposed project. Thus, no new or
irefined mitigation measures are required for issues related to agricultural resources.
I
I CEQA Determinations
i Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the projecf as described in Section 2.3 of this
I document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting from the
proposed project.
INo Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
I No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
I there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate a
new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information and
analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant impact
I requiring major revision of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
I Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impact on agricultural resources, there
is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
I 3. Air Quality - Would the Project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
I No Impact. Development within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which encompasses Orange
County and the non-desert regions of Los Angeles, San Bemardino, and Riverside Counties, requires
adherence to air quality standards established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District
I overall of the "Regional Center Mix Use Block" will remain
(SCAQMD).
The
acreage
(510
acres)
unchanged as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment. However, as proposed by the new
General Plan "Estimated Most" the commercial area will decrease 25 percent from 225 acres to 169
I well within the Regional Center Mixed Use range of 102-230 acres. The public area will
decrease by approximately 5 percent from 40 acres to 38 acres, well within the range of 26-61 acres.
The "medium, "medium-high" and "high" residential acreages will decrease by 29 percent from 98
I acres to 70 acres and increase by 26 percent from 1,372 dwelling units to 1,723 dwelling units, but
near the range of 77-153 acres and within the range of 1,078-2,142 dwelling units. The low-medium
acreage will increase by 515 percent from 32 acres to 197 acres and the number of dwelling units
I would increase by 287 percent from 208 units to 805 units. The total residential most likely acreage
would increase by 214 percent from 130 acres to 279 acres, and a 60 percent increase in the most
likely dwelling units from 1,580 dwelling units to 2,528 dwelling units. However, the total range for
Iresidential was originally 107-185 acres and under this proposed General Plan Amendment, the new
range would be 107-279, or an approximate 51 percent increase in acreage and increase by only 8.6
percent the number of units from a maximum of 2,398 dwelling units to 2,528 units. The project
iincorporated a number of land use planning objectives that was consistent with the land use policies
set forth in the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which describes a comprehensive air
pollution control program to meet State and Federal air quality standards in the SCAB. To comply
with the AQMP, a project must be consistent with the local and regional growth forecasts. While
being consistent local and regional growth forecasts, the FEIR previously found that the proposed
development of the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" site as delineated in the Mixed Use I.and
Use designation would, after implementation of the mitigation measures, exceed both short-term and
long-term emissions. Although the proposed project reduces the amount of area proposed for
commercial development and the number of residential dwelling units would increase; there are no
new mitigation measures that could be implemented that would reduce impacts to a level below
significant.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or No New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR.
The proposed project reduces the amount of area proposed for commercial development and the
maximum number of residential units would increase by only 8.6 percent for total of 130 additional
dwelling units. The total project area of 510 acres remains the same as was considered during the
review of the General Plan Update. There are no new mitigation measures that could be implemented
that would reduce impacts to a level below significant. As required by CEQA, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations was adopted concurrent with approval of the project and certification of
the FEIR. When evaluating whether changes to a project would result in new significant impacts, the
difference between the project and the project as
Lead
Agency
must
consider
the
incremental
original
modified. As the development of the proposed retail use is consistent with the uses envisioned in the
originally approved "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," the land use designation is not proposed to
change for the project site; therefore, no such significant change would occur. The level of emissions
is anticipated to be no greater than that identified in the previously certified FEIR; therefore, impacts
related to this issue will be less than significant.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under applicable Federal or State ambient air quality
standards (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or No New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR.
Please refer to Response 3(b). SCAB is designated as a "severe" nonattainment zone for ozone (03),
CO, NOx, and PM~0. However, the proposed project is an increment of development of the
significantly larger "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" project. While construction and operation of
the proposed residential and retail uses will generate air pollutants, the level of air emissions would be
no greater than that identified in the previously certified FEIR; therefore, impacts related to this issue
will be less than significant.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. There currently are no sensitive receptors that would be impacted by development of the
site, which is the subject to this General Plan Amendment. However, at an unspecified time in the
future, a new elementary school will be constructed on a portion of the site. The existing Mixed Use
General Plan designation is intended to provide for a variety of land uses including residential,
commercial and public facilities (schools, community centers, etc.). The proposed amendment does
R:\CRG330Lneclion3.revl a.doc (08/26/03) 3-17~//
not result in any changes to the land use designation and no new sensitive receptors are proposed in
this Amendment. As adherence to SCAQMD permitting requirements is a standard condition within
the SCAB, potential impacts related to this issue would be no greater than those identified in the
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact~No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
proposed project will result in the development of mixed uses in an area of other residential and
commercial uses. Over the short-term (during construction), there may be odors associated with the
operation of construction equipment. However, they would dissipate quickly and would only occur
during times construction equipment is operated. At such time as commercial and residential uses are
constructed, they would be subject to sanita~ requirements that would address odors emanating from
refuse bins. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant
than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEIR includes Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-15 provide some mitigation. The
minimal increase in the overall number of residential units (130) and the reduction in land area for
commercial development from a most likely land area of 225 acres to 169 acres and the reduction in
the land area designed for the construction of public tight-of-way from a most likely land area of 115
acres to 36 would have a beneficial impact on ah' quality. However, after development of the land
uses as provided by the Mixed Use Land Use designation, both short-term and long-term air quality
impacts remain significant.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to air quality.
CEQA Determinations
Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
are
required.
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
that would major changes to the FEIR. Since preparation of the
changes
in
circumstances
require
FEIR in 2001, air quality has continued to improve under SCAQMD implementation of the AQMP
(Current Air Quality and Trends in the South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD,
August 2001).
!
!
I No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
I This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
them is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
I of the FEIR. the air identified in the Victoria
impact
requiring
major
revisions
Using
quality
impacts
Gardens EIR as a baseline, the construction and operation of the proposed project will not result in a
net increase in the amount of air pollutants.
t· 3Io New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
i The analysis above shows that there are no feasible alternatives to the project or additional mitigation
measures that must be considered to substantially reduce one or mom of the significant effects
identified in the FEIR.
I 4. Biological Resources - Would the Project:
i a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or indirectly or through habitat
modification, on any species identified as a candida!e, sensitive, or special status in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
I No Impact. The following sensitive species that may occur in the Amendment area include listed as
State or federally as threatened or endangered the Santa Ama River woollystar (Eriastmm densifolium
t ssp. sanctorum), slender-homed spineflower (Dodecahema leptorceras), coastal California
gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), San Bemardino kangaroo mt (Dipodomys merriami
parvus) as well as other sensitive, but not listed as threatened or candidate species. These include
Party's spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi), San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma
I biainvillei), western owl (Athene cuniculaHa hypugea), and Bell's
coronatum
burrowing
sage
sparrow (Amphispiza bellii), which were evaluated as p~rt of the Victoria Gardens Rancho
Cucamonga Mall EIR to determine either their presence on the site or their likelihood to be present on
I the site. The Biological Resources Report prepared in conjunction with the Victoria Gardens Rancho
Cucamonga Mall Ell>, concluded that no animal or plant species listed as endangered, threatened, or
any candidate species inhabited or utilized the "Regional Cenmr Mixed Use Block" project site.
I However, both the western burrowing owl and Bell's sage sparrow were determined to be present on
site and development of the site will require compliance with appropriate provisions of the State Fish
and Game Code. The proposed Amendment to the General Plan does not contemplate any expansion
I in land area; thus, no new ama is proposed for development which may contain land suitable for
"critical habitat" or which may contain endangered or threatened species. Potential impacts
associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
i General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The Victoria Gardens Draft EIR determined that the on-site vegetation was dominated by
I California buckwheat (Eriogonum faciculatum) and, due to the monotypic nature of the site being
I R:\CRG330Xsecti°a3'revl a'd°c (08~26/03) 3'193q"~
I bordered by three major thoroughfares (Baseline Road, Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue)
and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel, the site is detached from other natural habitat areas. The
I site has previously been used as a vineyard. However, the vineyard is no longer operational, and the
land area subject to the proposed Amendment is the same as reviewed during preparation of the
General Plan Update in 2001; therefore, the loss of on-site vegetation would not result in a significant
i impact or substantially diminish habitat for wildlife or plants. Potential impacts associated with this
General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR;
therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
! c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal poo~ coastal, etc.)
i through direct removal,.Idling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. Wetlands were determined to be present during the preparation of the Victoria Arbors
Final E]R due to the loss of 1.4 acres of willow series on the site. Federal Section 401 and 404
· permits have been issued and a State Fish and Game 1603 permit has been issued. The City has
I
completed the necessary mitigation. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment
are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis
i is warranted.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native or resident migratory wildlife corridors, or
Iimpeded the use of native sites?
No Impact. Wildlife movements would likely be restricted to localized or daily movements because
t the site does have the characteristics of a major wildlife corridor. The project site is completely
bounded by major roadways Baseline Road, Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue, and the Day
Creek concrete-lined flood control channel. The site is fairly level and has been used for vineyard
purposes with limited native cover; thus, its function as a native wildlife corridor is unlikely. No
I impacts anticipated. No further discussion of this issue in the project EIR is
issue
is
required. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant
than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Impact. proposed Plan Amendment does not conflict with any local policies or
No
The
General
ordinances protecting biological resources. Should future development of the site require the removal
of the existing eucalyptus trees (eucalyptus sp.), such removal will be subject to the City's Tree
I Preservation Ordinance. The Ordinance does permit the removal of the on-site trees
subject to a permit from the City Planner, which may impose various measures including planting of
new trees, retention of some of the trees, etc. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
IAmendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
I
I
I a:XCltG33¢sectim3.rev, a.cloc {0Sa6/03)
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community
conservation plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The project site is not located within an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural
community conservation, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan;
therefore, no adverse change or impact related to this issue will occur.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEll>, includes Mitigation Measures BR-1 through BR-14, wtfich reduced potentially significant
impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
refined mitigation measures are required.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impacts resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or other~vise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR. The project site subject to
this General Plan Amendment has been previously utilized as a grape vineyard and the majority of the
native vegetation has been removed, it does not harbor any sensitive species. The overall land area
included within the proposed General Plan Amendment remains unchanged at 510 acres.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that indicate
may
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the project will not result in significant impacts on biotic resources, there is no need to
any
consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
5. Cultural Resources - Would the Project?
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined
in Section 15064.5 State Guidelines?
of the
CEQA
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. A
Cultural Resource Assessment was completed in 2001 in conjunction with preparation of the Rancho
Cucamonga Victoria Gardens Project Draft EIR that covers a portion of the site. The Assessment
determined that the impact to the on-site Foothill Fieldstone Stockpiles will have a less than
significant effect on the environment because the stockpiles do not meet the criteria for listing on the
California Register of Historic Resources. The overall land area designated for future development of
the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" will not increase as a result of this amendment to the General
Plan; therefore, approval of the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment. In
addition, according the Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Victoria Abors project, it was
determined that previous construction activities and agriculture apparently obliterated the remains of
cultural resources within the top few feet of sediments. Finally, the Assessment recommended that,
in the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of the project, ground-disturbing
activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be
evaluated by a qualified archaeologist.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5 of the State's CEQA Guidelines?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to Response 5(a).
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to Response 5(a).
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
project site has previously been developed as a vineyard. No cemetery, burial ground, or human
remains have been identified within the project area. Therefore, no adverse impact is forecast to
occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than
those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
CEQA Determinations
Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
R:\CRG330xsecli~3.revl a.d~ ~o8aoo3) 3-22
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to
the
FEm.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
No
New
Information
Showing
Ability
tO
Because the project will not result in any significant impacts to cultural resources, there is no need to
consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
6. Geology and Soils - Would the Project:
a)Expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring
Preparation
of
an
EIR.
As
described in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and General Plan EIR, the site has been
determined to be located outside any Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zone. As the project site is located
outside fault setback zone, the potential for ground rapture is less than significant. Potential
any
impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in
the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Refer to
6(a)(i) above. However, as determined by the Uniform Building Code, the site is located
Response
within Seismic Zone 4, which includes a variety of requirements for the design and construction of
structures which must be complied with prior to the issuance of building and/or occupancy permits.
The overall land area designated for future development of the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block"
will not increase as a result of this amendment to the General Plan; therefore, approval of the project
will have a less than significant impact. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR.
Liquefaction occurs when loose, unconsolidated, water-laden soils are subject to shaking, causing the
soils to lose cohesion. Although future development of the site designated for the future "Regional
R:\CRG330Xsec~i°n3'rev' a'd°c (08/26~03) 3'23 /7/7
I Center Mixed Use Block" is subject to severe shaking in the event of major earthquake and is
overlaid with loose, unconsolidated material, it is not in an area that has been determined to be
I saturated by a high water table, which is necessa~ for liquefaction to occur. Potential impacts
associated with this General'Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I iv) Landslides ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
I General Plan Update EIR indicates that the only area within the community that is expected to be
subject to landslides is located over four miles north of site. Due to the location of the proposed
"Regional Center Mixed Use Block" four miles from the area designated as having a potential for
I landslides, no impacts related to this issue are expected to occur. Potential impacts associated with
this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR;
therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I b) Result in substantialsoil erosion or loss of topsoil?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. On-site
Isoils consist of Tujunga Gravely Loamy Sand (0-9% slopes) and Tujunga Loam Sand (up to 30%
slopes), which have a very ]ow potential for runoff and a slight to moderate potential for erosion. The
uses allowed by this General Plan Amendment are consistent with the uses envisioned for the
I "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," and will be subject to the same mitigation requirements detailed
in the General Plan Update EIR. Adherence to these requirements will reduce potential impacts
associated with soil erosion or the loss of topsoil to a less than significant level. Potential impacts
associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
I General Plan EIR; therefore, no analysis
additional
is
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
I result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Refer to
I Responses 6(a)(iii) and 6(a)(iv) above. The proposed uses, uses,
public
facilities
are consistent with the uses envisioned in the General Plan Update EIR project, and will be subject to
the same mitigation requirements identified in the FEIR. Adherence to these requirements will
I reduce potential impacts associated with geotechnical issues to a less than significant level Potential
impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in
the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18-I-b of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
I than Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. On-site
Less
Significant
Impact/No
soils consist of two types of Tujunga soils series which are described as having a very low expansive
potential. Due to the presence of this type of soil, it is anticipated that there will be no impact
Iassociated with this issue due to development of the site. Potential impacts associated with this
General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR;
therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
No Impact. Sanitary sewer service will be extended to the site of this proposed General Plan
Amendment. Cucamonga County Water District provides transmission of wastewater flows and the
Utilities actual processing of No construction or use of
Inland
Empire
Agency
provides
sewage.
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems is required; therefore, no impact related to this
issue will occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more
significant than those identified in the General Plan Ell>,; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update Draft EIR includes Mitigation Measures SG-1 through SG-27, which
reduce potentially significant impacts resulting from seismic events, geotechnical conditions, and
grading to a less than significant level.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
Them are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment.
Therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in significant impact to geology or soils, there is no
any
need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
R:\CRG330~ection3.rcvl a.doc (08/26103) 3-25
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Would the Project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
construction and/or operation of residential, retail, and public facilities uses may entail the transfer,
storage, and sale of hazardous materials including, but not limited to, pesticides, fertilizers, paint
products, petroleum products, and compressed gases (propane, butane, etc.). Adherence to applicable
City, State, and Federal requirements, standards, and/or guidelines pertaining to the use, storage, sale,
or transport of hazardous materials will reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less
than significant level. The proposed project will not result in impacts greater than those identified in
the General Plan EIR. There is no substantial new information that there will be some new,
impact revisions of the General Plan Ell*,.
significant
requiring
Potential
impacts
with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan
EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
b) Create a significant harm to the public or the environment through ~reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As stated
in Response 7(a), the construction and operation of future residential, retail, or public facilities uses
may entail the transfer, storage, and use and sale of hazardous materials. Because of the potential
presence of hazardous materials on-site at the time of development, a potential exists for the
inadvertent release of hazardous materials. However, the total acreage of the "Regional Center
Mixed Use Block" remains unchanged. Adherence to applicable City, State, and Federal
requirements, standards, and/or guidelines pertaining to the use, storage, sale, or transport of
hazardous materials will reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less than significant
level. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than
those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
No Impact. An elementary school is proposed to be constructed within the northerly portion of the
site covered by this General Plan Amendment. However, the total acreage of the "Regional Center
Mixed Use Block" remains unchanged. Adherence to applicable City, State, and Federal
requirements, standards, and/or guidelines pertaining to the use, storage, sale, or transport of
hazardous materials will reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less than significant.
Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those
identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
d) Be on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code 675962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard for people
residing or working in the project area ?
No Impact. The EIR did not identify any hazardous material sites within the limits of the proposed
Regional Mixed-Use Block site. The site is not listed on the California Department of Substance
Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) as of June 30, 2003.
R:\eRG330~ection3.rev I a.doc (08/26/03) 3-26~
Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those
identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has been
adopted within 2 miles of a public airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. The site subject to the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element is
located 4.25 miles from the Ontario International Airport and is not located within an airport land use
plan or within 2 miles of a public or private ah'port; therefore, no impact associated with this issue
will occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant
than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. Please refer to Response 7(e).
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The project site is located adjacent to existing paved roadways that provide adequate
emergency access to the area subject to the amendment to the General Plan. Future residential uses,
facilities, and/or retail uses will be designed and constructed to provide adequate emergency
public
access to the property and on-site structures. Development of the proposed mixed uses will not
impede emergency access or interfere with an established emergency evacuation plan; therefore, no
impact associated with this issue will occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
h) Expose people or structurbs to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized area or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The project site is bounded by paved roadways and/or a concrete-lined drainage channel.
The area subject to the Amendment to General Plan Land Use Element is not located within, or
adjacent to wildlands, or areas subject to wildland fires. Therefore, no impact associated with this
issue will occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more
significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update EIR included Mitigation Measures HMC-1 tttrough HMC-3, which
reduced potentially significant hazardous material/risk of upset impacts to a less than significant
level.
' R,\CRG330~seclion3.revl a.doc (08/26/03) 3-27~/
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
refined mitigation measures are required.
CEQA Determinations
Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the EIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the General Plan EIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the General Plan F_JR was certified that
may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the General Plan EIR.
Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will
be some new, significant impact requiring major revisions of the General Plan EIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts expected to be caused by
hazardous materials, there is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
8. Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the Project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of. an EIR. The
General Plan Update EIR stated that grading activities associated with construction were anticipated
to temporarily increase the amount of suspended solids from surface flows. The FEIR identified
mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts related to flood control, drainage, and surface water
quality to a level below significance. These mitigation measures also reduce potential impacts
associated with violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements to a level below
significance. Because the FEIR analyzed and anticipated impacts related to the development of
regional mixed-use development, adherence to mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts
related to water quality standards and waste discharge to a less than significant level; therefore, the
proposed project will not result in impacts greater than those identified in the FEIR. Relative to the
impact forecast in the FEIR, no adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing land uses orplanned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
Less than Significam Impact/No Changes Information Requiring Preparation of E1R. The
or
an
General Plan Update EIR did not identify any impacts or mitigation relating to groundwater supplies
or groundwater recharge. Relative to the findings in the General Plan Update, no adverse change or
effect is forecast to occur.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
General Plan Update EIR did not identify any drainage patterns and/or streams or rivers existing on
the Regional Center Mixed Use Block site, or in the area that would be subject to erosion or siltation
by implementation of the General Plan. Relative to the findings in the General Plan Update EIR, no
adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner, which would result in.flooding on- or off-site?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
General Plan Update EIR did not find any drainage patterns and/or streams or rivers existing on the
Regional Center Mixed Use Block site, or in the area that by implementation of the General Plan
would cause the rate of surface runoff in a manner that would result in on- or off-site flooding.
Relative to the findings in the General Plan Update EIR, no adverse change or effect is forecast to
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
General Plan Update EIR did not find that by implementation of the General Plan, runoff would cause
the exceedance of the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage facilities, or create
additional sources of polluted runoff. Relative to the findings in the General Plan Update EIR, no
adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an E1R. The
General Plan Update E]R did not find that by development of the Regional Center Mixed Use Block
that water quality would be substantially be degraded. Relative to the findings in the General Plan
Update EIR, no adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
!
!
I g) Place housing within a IO0-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazards delineation ?
I No Impact. The General Plan Amendment Site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped
on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard delineation.
I h) Place within a IO0-year flood hazard structures that would redirect
impede
flo
i No Impact. Please refer to Response 8(h) above.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure ora levee or dam?
I No Impact. The project site is not located within an identified dam inundation area; therefore, no
impact associated with this issue will occur.
I j) Expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
No Impact. Neither a seiche or tsunami on the project site will occur. The site slopes gently to the
I s
outh and is not adjacent to hillsides or other areas, which could be the source of a mudfiow;
therefore, no impacts associated with this issue will occur.
I Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update EIR included Mitigation Measures HD-1 through HD-8 to mitigate
I potential flood contxol, drainage, and groundwater impacts that would result from development of the
"Regional Center Mixed Use Block" to a less than significant level.
IRefined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment. Therefore, no
new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to water quality.
I CEQA Determinations
Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
I Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
I implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major E1R Revisions.
I There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
I No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
Ithere is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the will result in and water there is
project
not
any
significant
impacts
on
hydrology
quality,
no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
9. Land Use and Planning - The project site which is subject to this General Plan Amendment
has a General Plan designation of Mixed Use and is a portion of the "Regional Center Mixed Use
Block." The site is generally undeveloped and was previously used as a vineyard. Currently a
winery, Buddhist Reception Center, and up to five single-family residences are located on the site
and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel is located on the east boundary of the site. Would the
Project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" permits the development of commercial uses
within the Plan area. The site, which is subject to this General Plan Amendment, is devoid of an
established community. Established neighborhoods exist north and west of the site, but are not
divided by this site. At such time as the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" is developed, it will be
the location of a variety of uses including residential (single family and multifamily), commercial,
public facilities (an elementary school and performing arts center, etc.), open space, etc. Relative to
the findings in the FEIR, no adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
project site and is designated and zoned "Mixed Use" and more particularly is designated as the
"Regional Center Mixed Use Block." The intent of the designation is to: achieve a powerful
commercial magnet within the region; create a unique urban village; establish a city and regional
landmark of visual excellence; and include a performing arts/entertainment center of regional
significance. Common features of Mixed Use developments include: highland pedestrian
environments; high degree of integration of uses; urban design approach; common theme or image
throughout; different scales; quality street scenes and pedestrian spaces; one or more forms of transit;
and unique and engaging experience for both residents and visitors. As part of the land use
entitlement review process the City Planner and Design Review Board will insure that developments
are consistent with the intent of the General Plan and include the various common features as
described for the Regional Center as envisioned in the General Plan.
Consistency with Local and Regional Policies
The site subject to this General Plan Amendment is designated as Mixed Use both by the General
Plan Land Use Element and the Victoria Community Plan. The proposed Amendment does not alter
either of the designations, but rather modifies the acreage of the density ranges of the "Regional
Center Mixed Use Block. The General Plan Update EIR stated that the revisions to the existing land
use designations will result in minor changes in development potential which will have a less than
significant change to the future laud use commitments that were established in the General Plan prior
to the Update. There is no other indication that the Mixed Use Designation was inconsistent with
other approved local policies.
City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
The EIR found that the Update did not include substantial revisions in land use designations or
patterns. Also, "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" would provide a more defined mixed-use
designation. This Amendment does not expand the size of the 510-acre "Regional Center Mixed Use
Block" site, but only revises the range of land use acreage and densities with the Block. This
Amendment makes no changes to existing General Plan goals or policies.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan?
No Impact. Neither the project site nor the larger "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" project area is
located within any local, regional or State natural community habitat conservation plan. Therefore,
the proposed project will not conflict with the provisions of any such plan. Relative to the findings in
the FEIR for the adopted "Regional Mixed Use Center Block," no adverse change or effect is forecast
tO occur.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEIR did not include mitigation measures related to land use/planning issues.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
are no new significant impacts proposed no new
There
associated
with
the
project.
Therefore,
refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to land use or planning.
CEQA Determinations
Major E1R Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting .from the
proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final E1R.
Tiffs Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the General Plan Ell*, was certified that
may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the General Plan EIR.
Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will
be a new, significant impact requiting major revisions of the General Plan EIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" EIR does not identify any potentially significant impacts
related to land use; therefore, there are no potentially significant effects to be further mitigated.
10. Mineral Resources - Would the Project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the State?
No Impact. The area subject to this General Plan Amendment does not contain mineral resources
identified by the State as containing a significant mineral resource to residents of the State and/or
region; therefore, there are no potentially significant effects to be further mitigated.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locMly important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
No Impact. Please refer toResponse 10(a).
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEIR did not include mitigation measures related to mineral resources because the State did not
identify the site subject to this General Plan Amendment as containing a significant mineral resource
to residents of the State and/or region.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to mineral resources.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting from the
proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final E1R.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" EIR does not identify any potentially significant impacts
related to mineral resources; therefore, there are no potentially significant effects to be further
mitigated.
11. Noise -Would the Project:
Result in the of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards
a)
exposure
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
overall number of acres (510) in the "Regional Center Mix Use Block" is not affected by this General
Plan Amendment. The General Plan Update DEIR stated that, after implementation of the mitigation
contained in the EIR, noise existing land uses would remain
measures
long-term
impacts
on
significant and unavoidable. However, all other noise impacts (short-term and long-term) would be
less than significant after implementation. Even though there would be a decrease in the number of
individuals that would be subject to noise impacts associated with development of the "Regional
Center Mixed Use Block" that would be affected by this General Plan Amendment because the total
number of dwelling units will increase by 130 additional dwelling units under the most likely to
develop scenario, the impacts remain essentially the same as described in the General Plan Update
EIR.
Noise Element of the General Plan. The applicable noise standards governing the development of
the Mixed Use General Plan designation are the criteria in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Noise
Element of the General Plan and Municipal Code. No changes are proposed to the Noise Element as
a result of this proposed project.
Municipal Code. The City of Rancho Cucamonga in its Municipal Code, Chapter 11.44, Noise
Limits, sets exterior noise limits which were addressed in the General Plan Update EIR.
Construction A ctivities
Two types of short-term noise impacts would occur during implementation of "Mixed Use" land use
designation. The fa'st is the increase in traffic flow on local streets associated with the transport of
workers, equipment, and materials to and from the project site. The second type of short-term noise
impact is related to the noise generated by heavy equipment operating on the project site. The
minimal increase of 130 additional units and the decrease in the commercial under
dwelling
acreage,
the most likely to develop scenario, will reduce the number of individuals subject to the short-term
noise impacts.
I
I
I b) Expose persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne
noise levels?
I Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
minimal increase of 130 additional dwelling units and the decrease in the commercial acreage, under
the most likely to develop scenario, will reduce the number of individuals subject to the short-term
I noise Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more
impacts.
significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
I c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
I Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an
EIR.
The
minimal increase of 130 additional dwelling units and the decrease in the commercial acreage, under
the most likely to develop scenario, will reduce the number of individuals subject to the short-term
I noise impacts. Potential impacts associated with this Genera] Plan Amendment are no more
significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
I d) Result in a substantial temporary orperiodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
minima/increase of 130 additional dwelling units and the decrease in the commercial acreage will
reduce the number of individuals subject to the short-term noise impacts. Potential impacts
I associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
General Plan Ell},; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
I e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been
adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
I No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport. Therefore, the project would not expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
I Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
I f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The project site is not located within the vicinity ora private airstrip. Therefore, there are
Ino impacts related to this issue.
!
i
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update E1R did included Mitigation Measures N-1 through N-5, which, when
implemented, reduce all impacts (short-term and long-term) other than long-term impacts on existing
land uses to less than significant.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to noise.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required~
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new environmental
significant
impacts
resulting
from
the
proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR.
Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final E1R.
No
New
Information
Because the proposed project will not result in any new significant impact on noise, there is no need
to consider altematives or additional mitigation measures. No feasible alternatives to the project or
additional mitigation measures need to be considered to substantially reduce the significant effects.
Population and Housing - Would the Project:
12.
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure) ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
amount of land proposed for commercial development under the General Plan decrease by 25 percent,
thus reducing any need for additional housing units. It is anticipated that under the "most likely"
scenario the number of housing units will increase by 948; however, the total number of units would
increase by only 130 units. The 130 additional total number of residential units would result in an
additional population increase of 395 individuals based on the General Plan's projection of 3.04
individuals per dwelling unit. Therefore, the population growth impacts are considered less than
significant. The DEIR concluded that impacts on population or housing would not have a significant
effect on the environment; thus, no mitigation measures were included.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The are no more than five dwellings currently existing on
the
General
Plan
Amendment
site and, should they be demolished or removed from the site, their displacement would be considered
less than significant. In addition, up to 130 units more than the existing proposed total of 2,398
units could be built on the site. The removal of the residences would not be substantial
dwelling
decrease in the housing stock within the overall City of Rancho Cucamonga.
e) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No Impact. Please refer to Response 12(b) above.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update EIR did not include mitigation measures related to population and housing.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to population and housing.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisior~s Not Required.
and there is evidence that changes to the FEIR
Based
the
foregoing
analysis
information,
major
on
no
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that them are no new significant environmental impacts resulting from the
proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major E1R Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available are
that
indicates
that
there
substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final E1R.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
them is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impact on population and housing,
there is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
13. Public Services - Would the Project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the following public services?
i) Fire protection ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or lnfortnation Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
Rancho Cucamonga. Fire District provides fire services to the area subject to this General Plan
Amendment. Based on the Fire District's manning requirement of 0.18 firefighter per 1,000
residents, the increase of 395 residents would result in a demand for 0.21 f'uefighter. There are
currently five fire stations within the City with an additional station to be occupied in the fall of 2003.
ii) Police protection ?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Law
enforcement services within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are provided by the San Bernardino
County Sheriff's Department (SBCSD.) The Department's Rancho Cucamonga Station is located at
10510 Civic Center Dxive adjacent to the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center and five satellite offices
are located throughout the City. Nearly 100 deputies currently serve the City, with additional police
services provided under the overall umbrella of the SBCSD. Eight out of nine Part 1 crime categories
decreased in the City in 2002 from the previous year (Rancho Cucamonga Crime Statistics.
CAM/RDS System, Date Unknown).
The DEIR stated that, with implementation of the Mitigation Measures, implementation of the
General Plan Update, which includes the proposed "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," would result
in a less than significant impact on police services and facilities.
iii) Schools?
No Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment anticipates the future development of a mixed-
use residential/commercial/public facility center. At the time the General Plan Update Draft EIR was
prepared, both the Etiwanda and the Cucamonga School Districts, which provide school services for
the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," had excess student capacity. In addition, the "Regional
Center Mixed Use Block" is the site of a future elementary school. Relative to the impacts forecast in
the General Plan Update EIR, no adverse change or to occur. Using most
effect
is
forecast
the
conservative school generation of 0.66 student, as identified in the General Plan Update EIR, per
dwelling unit, the addition of a maximum of 130 additional total units in the "Regional Center Mixed
Use Block" would result in a maximum of 86 additional students in the Etiwanda and/or Cucamonga
School Districts. In addition, the General Plan Update EIR stated that there is excess student capacity
in each Disn'ict.
iv) Parks?
No Impact. The project will not have a significant impact on parks, and will not increase demand for
additional park and recreation services for the reasons stated above. The project will not result in a
demand on local or regional park/recreation facilities beyond that identified in the previous
environmental documentation for the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block." Relative to the impacts
forecast in the FEIR, no adverse change or effect is to occur.
forecast
v) Other Public Facilities ?
No Impact. The "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" would utilize other public services which are
available to all individuals either residing and/or working within the City including library and
community facilities (Community Center, City streets and drainage facilities, etc.). These facilities
are funded by General Fund monies, grants, restricted funds, etc., and continue to operate based on
demand and available funding. However, cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will
increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the
increase in library under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The
projected
space
General Plan Update EIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately
adopted by the City Council. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new
library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet,
which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build out of the City.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The General Plan Update E1R included Mitigation Measures FS-1 through FS-9; P-I through P-10;
and S-1 through S-4 to reduce potential fire, police protection, and schools impacts, which, when
implemented, would be mitigated to a level of less than significant. However, with implementation
of the mitigation measures identified in the General Plan Update EIR, impacts on parks and recreation
would have a beneficial impact due to the anticipated excess parkland within the community.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment. Therefore, no
new mitigation measures are required for issues related to public services.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting from the
proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
I
!
I No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
.~l This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
!
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEll>, was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant
I impact requiring major
revisions
of the
FEm.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impact on public services, there is no
need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
I
14. Recreation - Would the Project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
I Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
future development of the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" site will potentially create a need for
recreational facilities. However, the City's Development Code requires that a minimum percentage
of medium to high-density developments be preserved as open space. Additionally, the City also
collects park fees at the time of development. Therefore, the furore development of the site subject to
the amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element will provide open space and pay appropriate
i park fees, thus meeting any increased demand for recreational uses. No further review of this issue is
required. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant
than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
Provide recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
b)
facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
iNo Impact. Please refer to Response 14(a). A less than significant effect is anticipated with regard to
this project. No further analysis of this issue in the project EIR is required. Potential impacts
associated with tiffs General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
!
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
I The General Plan Update EIR included Mitigation Measures FS-1 through FS-9; P-1 through P-10;
and S-1 through S-4 to reduce potential fire, police protection, and schools impacts, which, when
implemented, would be mitigated to a level of less than significant. However, with implementation
I of the mitigation measures Update impacts on parks
identified
in
the
General
Plan
Em,
and
recreation
would have a beneficial impact due to the anticipated excess parkland within the community.
New/Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no new and/or
i refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to park and recreation facilities.
I R:\CRG 330Xsexaion32evl a.doc (08/26/03) 3-4~
i CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
!· Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
i document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting~ from the
proposed project.
INo Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FF_.JR.
I No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
I there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant
I impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
I Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impact on recreation services or
facilities, there is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
15. Transportation/Traffic - There are several important roadway corridors serving the project
site. The site is located immediately east of Interstate 15 (I-15). 1-15 is a major ffansportation
I corridor linking the southern portions of the State with to the northeast and southerly to Mexico.
Both Baseline Road and Foothill Boulevard provide direct access to the site addressed by this
General Plan Amendment. The following analysis is based on a Traffic Impact Study prepared
for the General Plan Update by Robert Kahn, John Kain and Associates, Inc. (RKJK) (August
I 2002). Would the Project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and
I capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. A Traffic
I Impact Study prepared for the General Plan Update found that, at build out, the City could anticipate
a total of 1.46 million daily trips per day. Furthermore, the General Plan Update stated with
implementation of the identified mitigation measures; completion of specific roadway improvements
I as identified in the Traffic Study; and allowing seven identified streets to operate at level of service
(LOS) E will result in a less than significant effect from development of the proposed General Plan
upon all intersections within the Planning Area. In addition, based on a preliminary analysis of the
Iimpacts of this proposed amendment to the General Plan (reduction of total commercial acreage and
increase in total residential units) would be insignificant and would not affect the previous General
Plan Traffic Analysis. In particular, this proposed Amendment would result in an approximately 500
Iaverage daily trip (Al)T) reduction and a p.m. peak hour reduction of 30 trips. Potential impacts
associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the
General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the
County congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to Response 15(a).
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
proposed project will not affect air traffic patterns. Relative to the impact forecast in the FEIR, no
adverse change or effect is forecast to occur.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
project site is bounded by paved, improved roadways. To alleviate potential, hazards access to the
project will be designed and constructed per City standards. The project site is located within an area
designated for the development of residential and commercial uses; therefore, existing and/or planned
traffic improvements will not be incompatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed General
Plan Amendment will not conflict with adopted policies that support alternative transportation.
Impacts associated with this issue will not exceed those identified in the FEIR. Relative to the impact
forecast in the FEIR for the approved General Plan Update, no adverse change or effect is forecast to
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
project site is located adjacent to existing paved roadways that provide adequate emergency to the
project site and adjacent areas. The proposed mixed uses will be designed and constructed to provide
adequate emergency access to the property and on-site structures. Development of the proposed uses
allowed by the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" will not impede emergency access or interfere
with an established emergency evacuation plan; therefore, no impact associated with this issue will
occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than
those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code establishes parking standards dependant
upon specific uses including requirements for residential, commercial and public uses. During the
review of specific development plans, the City Planner, Design Review Board, and/or Planning
Commission will review the plans to determine that the proposed uses comply with adopted parking
requirements. The reduction in commercial acreage will result in a need for fewer parking spaces, the
minimal increase of 130 total residential units is insignificant, and any development will be required
to comply with the City's parking requirements. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
No Impact. The proposed project will be required to comply with adopted policies that
support
altemative transportation. Relative to the impact forecast in the FEIR for the approved General Plan
Update including the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," no adverse change or effect is forecast to
occur. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than
those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
h) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" will facilitate the
safe on-site passage of pedestrians and bicyclists. The design and construction of the sidewalks,
parking areas, and pedestrian areas will adhere to applicable City, State, and Federal requirements,
including compliance with applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Adherence to established safety and accessibility standards will reduce potential impacts associated
with this issue to a less than significant level. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan
Amendment are no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no
additional analysis is warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEIR included Mitigation Measures TC-1 through TC-9 to mitigate potential txansportation and
access impacts to a to a less than significant level.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment. Therefore, no
new and/ur refined mitigation measures are required.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Revisions Not Required.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there is no new significant environmental impact resulting from
implementation of the proposed project.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
R ACRG330~e~ion3.revl a.doc (08~26/03, 3-433 7
that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be some new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in related traffic circulation
any
significant
impacts
tO
or
issues, there is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
16. Utilities and Service Systems - Would the Project:
a) Exceed wustewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Using the
generation factors contained in the General Plan Update EIR it can be assumed that the total amount
of additional wastewater generated by this proposed General Plan Amendment would be
approximately 0.03 million gallons per day. The General Plan Update EIR determined that the
incremental amount of wastewater generated for the entire City and sphere area Update would be 4.0
million gallons per day, and this Amendment to the General Plan would add 0.0004 million gallons
per day, or less. The additional 0.0004 million gallons per day would be considered to be less than
significant and would not cause an exceedance of Regional Water Quality Control Board
requirements.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to 16(a). In addition, the Water District the site
response
Cucamonga
County
provides
water
tO
through arrangements with the Inland Empire Utilities Agency and its own sources. The total
incremental change is negligible and as result of continuing coordination with the Water District as
required by the General Plan Update DEIR adequate water sources will be available to serve the site.
Senate Bill (SB) 610 (October 9, 2001) resulted in amendments to Section 21151.9 of the Public
Resources Code. Revising provisions established by SB 901, SB 610 requires any city or county,
having determined that specific project is subject to CEQA, to identify any public water system that
may supply water for the project and ask the responsible water purveyor to prepare a specified water
supply assessment. The water supply assessment would be required for projects meeting the
following criteria:
· 500 or more dwelling units;
· Commercial center employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet;
· Office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet;
· A hotel/motel with 500 or more rooms;
· An industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park employing more than 1,000
persons or occupying more than 40 acres, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor area;
· A mixed-use project that would demand an amount of water equivalent of equal to the amount of
water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; or
where the has fewer that 5,000 service connections,
areas
public
water
system
any
development that would increase water demand by 10 percent or greater in the number of existing
service connections, or in the case of a mixed-use development, an increase in water required by
residential development representing 10 percent or greater in the number of existing service
connections.
Such an assessment would typically include, among other information, the identification of existing
water entitlements, water rights, or water service contracts relevant to the water supply identified for a
proposed project, and the amount of water received pursuant to such entitlements, rights, or contracts.
SB 610 requires the public water system, city, or county to submit plans for acquiring the required
water supply for a proposed project if the water supply assessment concludes that water supplies are
or will become insufficient. The proposed project docs not meet the above-stated criteria requiring a
water supply assessment because the this project does not meet the definition of a project in codified
Section 10912 of the Water Code. In addition, the land area designated for commercial development
will decrease by 56 acres and the total number of residential dwelling units result in only a 130-unit
increase.
Project impacts on water availabilit3~, assessed for build out of the General Plan Update, were based
on whether adequate water supply would be available to meet the demands of the Update inclfiding
the site subject to this General Plan Amendment. It was determined that with the Cucamonga County
Water District has the ability to meet increased water demand as envisioned in the General Plan
Update. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than
those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR.
Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment will result in the construction of
impermeable surfaces for the purpose of stormwater drainage. The General Plan Update EIR
identified mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts related to stormwater drainage to a less
than significant level. No adverse change or effect as a result of implementation of the proposed
project is forecast to occur because the overall total number of acres subject to this General Plan
Amendment remains constant relative to the analysis completed in the General Plan Update EIR.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to Response 16(b).
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider who serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to
the provider's existing commitments?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please
refer to Response 16(a).
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. An
existing winery and fewer than five dwelling units exist on the site generating only a minimal amount
of solid waste. Solid waste generated from construction impacts would be limited to new building
construction and site operations. As stated in the General Plan Update EIR, approximately 236 tons
of solid waste would be generated per day by all development envisioned by the General Plan Update.
Tiffs proposed project would result in an increase of 1,040 pounds, or less than a 0.5 percent increase
in the amount projected in the 2001 General Plan Update. This increase would not have a significant
effect. The State Integrated Waste Management Board has preliminarily estimated that the City of
Rancho Cucamonga in 2001/02 diverted approximately 38 percent of its solid waste to places other
than the landfills.
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The EIR
included mitigation mandating continuing implementation of waste reduction procedures consistent
with provisions of AB 939. Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no
more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is
warranted.
Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR
The FEIR included Mitigation Measures W-1 through W-6, HD-1 through ItD-6, and SW-1
through SW-2 to reduce impacts to utilities and service systems resulting from development of the
General Plan Update, including the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block," to a level below
significance.
Refined Project Mitigation Measures
There are no new significant impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment. Therefore, no
new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to utilities and service systems.
CEQA Determinations
Major EIR Required.
Revisions
Not
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the FEIR
are required. Comparison of the previous project with the project as described in Section 2.3 of this
document indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts resulting fi.om the
proposed project.
I
I
I
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions.
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial
changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the FEIR.
i No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in Final EIR.
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether
there is new information that was not available at the time the FEIR was certified that may indicate
I that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the FEIR. Based on the information
and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new, significant
impact requiring major revisions of the FEIR.
I No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final
EIR.
Because the proposed project will not result in any significant impact on utility and service systems,
I there is no need to consider alternatives or additional mitigation measures.
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance
I a) POTENTIAL TO DEGRADE: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
I or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
i prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As
previously stated, the project site does not provide habitat for any endangered or threatened species.
I Development of the mixed-use development will not degrade habitat or otherwise affect any
endangered or threatened species. The site has previously been determined to contain wetlands and,
in conjunction with the Victoria Arbors project, the necessary Federal 401 and 404 permits, and State
I 1603 permits have been obtained and the required mitigation has been completed. Western
burrowing owl was determined to be present on site. It was determined during the preparation of the
Victoria Gardens EIR that likely only a low number of burrowing owls may occupy the site or use the
I site for foraging habitat. Because the western burrowing owl is not currently listed as threatened or
endangered, the potential impacts to the few individuals or the foraging habitat was not considered
significant. Bell's sage sparrows were also observed on the site during the preparation of the Victoria
Gardens EIR, but due to the lack of listing and the degradation of the site, the potential impacts to this
I considered The proposed Amendment to the General Plan does not
species
contemplate any expansion in land area; therefore, no new area which may contain land suitable for
"critical habitat" or which may contain endangered or threatened species is proposed for
I development. However, development of the site will require compliance with appropriate provisions
of the State Fish and Game Code.
IMitigation measures were included in the General Plan Update EIR that would require a variety of
preconstruction activities to address cultural resources ranging from historic records reviews to field
surveys and the use of on-site monitors if historic resources are found before or during grading, etc.
I
Potential impacts associated with this General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those
identified in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no additional analysis is warranted.
b) CUMULATIVE IMPACTS: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when reviewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future project.)
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The
proposed project is a component of the larger General Plan Update, which included adoption of the
"Regional Center Mixed Use Block" land use designation. The cumulative impacts associated with
development of the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" have been addressed in previous
environmental documents. The nature of the proposed development is consistent with the uses
envisioned in the "Regional Center Mixed Use Block" and would not would not contribute
significantly to cumulative impacts in excess of that identified in said documents.
c. ADVERSE IMPACTS ON HUMANS: Does the project have environmental effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact/No Changes or Information Requiring Preparation of an E1R. The
proposed mixed uses are consistent with the land uses envisioned in the "Regional Center Mixed Use
Block." As detailed in the aforementioned responses, development of the mixed-use block will result
either in no impact or a less than significant impact. Adherence to mitigation measures identified in
the FEIR for the General Plan Update will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment are no more significant than those identified in
the General Plan Update FEIR.
18. Department of Fish and Game 'De Minimus' Finding
a. Will the project have an adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and
wildlife resources? Wildlife shall be defined for the purpose of this question as "all wild
animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends for its continued viability."
No Impact. The project site has been previously rough graded for development of a vineyard and
winery. Based on a Biological Resources Report prepared in conjunction with the Rancho
Cucamonga Mall and the Victoria Arbors Village projects, it was determined that "due to the absence
of San Bemardino kangaroo mt from the site and the low value of the site as critical habitat, potential
impacts to the species (i.e., loss of proposed habitat) are not considered significant." Surrounding
development makes the foraging, dispersal or other use of the site by endangered/threatened species
unlikely. Because of the degraded nature of the site, lack of native species, adjacent urban uses,
disturbance from traffic noise, and the site's lack of constituent elements, impacts to
considered As addressed in the Initial
endangered/threatened
species
are
not
significant.
Study/Addendum, there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have the
potential for an adverse effect on wildlife or wildlife habitat.
1
1
I 4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND REFERENCES
I
I 4.1 LIST OF PREPARERS
This document was prepared under the direct management of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as Lead
IAgency for the proposed project, and reflects the independent judgment and position regarding the
environmental consequences of the proposed project.
I City of Rancho Cucamonga
i Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
Lead Consultant
I LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA)
En vironmentaVPlanning Consultants
I Lynn Calvert-Hayes, AICP, Principal in Charge
Steve Walker, Senior Planner
Steve Dong, Technical Editing
I Jennifer Schuk, Graphics
Sheryl Schumacber, Production
4.2 REFERENCES
i City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, adopted November 17, 2001.
Final Environmental Impact Report Victoria Arbors Village SCH No. 98041137, LSA Associates,
Inc., May 20, 1999.
I Initial Study/Addendum Victoria Arbors Village, LSA Associates, Inc., November 2, 2000.
IDraft Environmental Impact Report Victoria Gardens SCH No. 2001031028, LSA Associates, Inc.,
September 21, 2001.
I
I
I
Mr. Buller explained the conditional use permit process and said that approval of
Amendment would only enable someone to request that use, it would not approve any He
said the special conditions needed for this use to be considered would mean the Corem would
feel the need for an alternative buffer between a major noise generator, such as ~ and
either existing or future residences. He explained that under the conditional use ~rocess, they
would look at that specific criteria as well as other criteria that would make the
neighborhood. He stated the Commission would not be obligated uest if it could
not determine compatible through public testimony, conditions, etc. He said the
residents will have every right to raise questions and issues should ti )lication move forward.
Comn' previously, it
was felt they want to be flexible in opportunities to enrich However, she felt the
particular property mentioned this evening may or may she was not yet
convinced it would be a good use. She felt the palatable may not
be acceptable to the applicant. She said it would h-' be a superior facility. She supported the
Development Code Amendment.
Commissioner McNiel also supported the He observed there are several such facilities
in the community and he felt the use is 'the least intrusive of any function in the community.
He said it does to occur and the hours are limited. He felt it would be
preferable to have because the residents use the facilities.
Commissioner ~ is off Arrow Route and there are numerous such facilities
along that area. He -' less traffic than retail or residential. He felt the
amendment will is beneficial to the community and it would not be
detrimental. ~pprove a specific project, but would make conditions
flexible. He said ~ has a strong history of closely regulating conditional use permits.
Motion: seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution recommending
DRC2003-00709. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MAClAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL
NONE
STEWART - carded
L. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to amend the Regional Center Land Use Mix Table 111-4 by modifying the land use
acreage ranges and the density ranges to be consistent with the approved development projects
within the Regional Center that is generelly bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Une Road, 1-15
Freeway, and Day Creek Channel. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 or
Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact
Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.
commissioner McNiel asked if the action was a clean up item.
Ms. Fong confirmed that was correct.
Chairman Macias opened the public hearing. There was no testimony and he closed the hearing.
Commissioner Fletcher asked for confirmation that this would not increase total density.
Bred Buller, City Planner, confirmed the total number of units remains the same.
Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 24, 2003
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of
General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00712. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, McPHAtL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
NEW BUSINESS -- ~
M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
ROCK LLC - A request to develop a 17,435 square foot multi-tenant auto on 1.43
acres of land in the Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 9 An'ow Route ~
APN: 0209-012-10.
Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Macias invited public comment.
Doug Peeters, Managing Partner, West Rock, LLC Court, Rancho Cucamonga,
agreed with staff's recommendation. He felt the be aesthetically pleasing.
Commissioner McNiel asked if there is and if all maintenance activity will occur
inside the building.
Mr. Peters stated there will only be light [ype uses such as oil changes, mufflers, and
brakes. He said the~ needing to stay overnight as they don't intend to
do any transmission work.
Commissioner some facilities that started out self-contained but they now
have parking lots full He wanted to be sdre care are not stacked up in the
parking lot being repaired or
There was no further ~omment.
Commissioner some facilities on 8th Street where dismantled automobiles
have accumulated He said people may have the best of intentions but he was concerned
that here.
Brad Bullet, , Planner, suggested adding conditions that all repair service to be conducted inside
the and no cars shall be stored outside ovemight.
McNiel supported the additional conditions.
Fletcher noted there will be some cars parked outside during the day awaiting work.
Macias agreed and said he just did not want vehicles sitting around waiting for parts.
Commissioner McPhail stated the applicant worked diligently with staff and the Design Review
Committee to make the facility attractive.
Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Macias, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the
resolution approving Development Review DRC2003-00302. Motion carded by the following vote:
, Planning Commission Minutes -13- September 24, 2003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00712, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE REGIONAL
CENTER LAND USE MIX TABLE 111-4 BY MODIFYING THE LAND USE
ACREAGE RANGES AND THE DENSITY RANGES TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE
REGIONAL CENTER THAT IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, BASE LINE ROAD, 1-15 FREEWAY, AND DAY CREEK
CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment
No. DRC2003-00712, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 24, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
d. This amendment will continue to comply with the environmental mitigation listed in
the Final EIR entitled "Final Environmental Impact Repor~ State Clearinghouse No. 2000061027."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-
DRC2003-00712 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 15, 2003
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby determines that none of the elements set forth in Public Resources
Code Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
("CEQA Guidelines") exists and therefore determines, in accordance with Public Resources Code
Section 21166 or Section 15162 of the CEQA Guideline. s, that no subsequent or supplemental
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared, pdor to
adopting this Resolution.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. DR02003-00712, through the adoption
of the attached Resolution and Exhibit "A," and all related Land Use Tables shall be amended to
reflect the changes in acreage and density.
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
$77
TABLE 111-4
THE REGIONAL CENTER LAND USE MIX
· Acreage Range Estimated
· Density "Most Case"
(du/acre) Acres/Dwelli
Percent · Dwelling Unit ng Units
Land Use Range Rankle (du)
Commercial - retail, 20% - 102-230 acres 169 acres
service commemial, 45%
office, tourist
commercial
Public/Quasi Public - 5% - 12% 26-61 acres 38 acres
performing arts center,
trails,
landscape/hardscape,
public spaces
Residential 13%-17% 65-80 acres @ 70 acres @
19 du/acre2 19 du/acre2
1,235 to 1,520 du 1,330 du
Residential - Low 130-157 acres 142 acres
Medium 25%-31% 4-8 du/acre 797 du3
780-942 du
Total Residential~ 195-237 acres 212 acres
38%-46% 2,015-2,462 du 2~127 du
ROW - collector/local 18% 90-110 acres 91 acres
roads
TOTALS 100% 510 acres 510 acres
1. The acreage in this category also includes land for local park and school
purposes.
2. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to an
average of 24du/ac as long as the total of 2,462 dwelling units is not exceeded.
3. Indicates target dwelling units based on historic city experience where
develoF~ment occurs midway between 50 and 75% of the rankle.
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESO
EXHIBIT A
i:~planning~finalXcitycncMrc2003~0712enh a 9-24.doc
T H C I T Y 0 F
]~AN C H 0 C U CA ~l 0 N C,A
$ fRepor
October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, ^ICP, City Maaager
FRO~: Rex Gutiorrez, Council Member
Robert Howdyshell, Council Member
SUBJECT: Recommendations from the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Background
Over the past several months, the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee has been
reviewing the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter programs and services and
studying numerous ideas and proposals to enhance the effectiveness of the animal
care and control services provided to our community. The Subcommittee is
prepared to make several recommendations to the City Council regarding the
Shelter program.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has two separate contracts with the County of San
Bemardino to provide animal care and control services in our City. One contract is
for the provision of animal control services. These field services include impounding
and quarantining animals, canvassing the City to enfome regulations, citation
issuance, investigations, and dog licensing and vaccinations. The City has
contracted with the County for animal control services since 1983. The contract
amount of $62,700 has remained unchanged since that time.
The other animal care contract between the City and the County provides for the
operation of the City's Animal Shelter. When the Rancho Cucamonga Animal
Shelter commenced operations in September 1996, the City entered into a $108,000
contract with the County to operate the Shelter for the City. The contract for shelter
operations has increased to $305,600 per year. These increases over time have
been due to expanded service hours and State legislation increasing the minimum
time period for holding stray animals and mandating the spaying/neutering of all
animals adopted out of shelters. The County also keeps all revenues from licensing
and adoption services.
The Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter is considered to be one of the finest
municipal facilities in the area. The efforts of the dedicated staff and volunteers
have resulted in our Shelter achieving some of the highest adoption rates of dogs
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 2 of 7
and cats in the County last year. Of the animals entering the Rancho Cucamonga
Animal Shelter in 2002, 57% of the dogs and 35% of the cats were returned to their
owners or found new homes. The following chart compares adoption/return to owner
and euthanasia rates for 2002 among cities in the County:
Dogs Dogs I Cats Cats
City entedng Adopted Dogs entedng adopted o~ Cats
shelter or RTO euthanized shelter RTO euthanized
Rancho Cucamonga 2461 1391 57% 906 37% 2208 783 35°/~ 1303 59%
3,ounty unincorporated:
~)evore Shelter 8987 2415 27% 6271 70% 5483 692 13°/~ 4555 83%
3hino, Chino Hills,
Vlontclair, Ontado 4436 1416 26% 2816 63% 4766 450 8°/~ 3827 80°/
q~edlands 1378 763 55°/ 575 42°/ 1194 410 30°/" 771 65°/
~ialto 2031 624 31o/ 1384 68% 1448 215 11°/. 1204 83°/
~an Bemardino, Fontana,
_oma Linda, Colton 9335 2741 30°/ 6486 69% 5685 650 7% 4962 87%
31and 986 876 88°/ 93 9% 987 426 43% 498 50%
ctorville 1921 478 25% 1443 75°/, 1057 109 6% 948 90%
(ucca Valley 984 319 32% 565 57°,{ 293 85 9% 206 70°/,
Figures taken from 2002 County Annual Report of Rabies Control Activities
*Note: the outcome of animals not accounted for would include DOAs, escapes or transfers
Our Shelter statistics continue to improve. So far in 2003, the number of animals
euthanized at the Rancho Cucamonga Shelter has decreased from 2002 rates by
7% for dogs and by 6% for cats. It should be noted that the statistics included in the
table above do not distinguish adoptable animals from those that are not considered
adoptable. Because we are a municipal shelter, we are obligated to accept all
animals, including strays, sick animals, and those with behavior problems such as
being dangerously aggressive. When the animals considered as "not adoptable" are
factored into our statistics, the Rancho Cucamonga Shelter statistics for 2003 are
very favorable:
2003 year-to-date adoption rates for adoptable animals:
86% dogs, 66% cats
The success of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter programs is due to the
efforts of the dedicated Shelter staff and volunteers. The Shelter operates
numerous programs and services to find homes for shelter animals and to promote
responsible pet ownership by educating the community about spay and neutering.
Some of the existing programs and services at the Shelter include the following:
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 3 of 7
· Mandatory Spa¥/Neuterin.q: All animals adopted from the Shelter are spayed
or neutered. If an adopted animal hasn't been altered, the animal is
transported to a vet where the pet owner may claim it after it has been
altered.
· License Fee Differential: In an effort to promote responsible pet ownership,
annual license fees for dogs are substantially different between
spayed/neutered (altered) dogs and unaltered dogs. The current annual
license fee for altered dogs is $12 and the fee for unaltered dogs is $60.
These fees have been in effect since July, 2002. Reduced license rates of
$9 for altered dogs are available for senior citizens (age 65 and older) and
disabled persons.
· License Canvassin.q: Every year, during the months of January through April,
animal license checkers canvass the City of Rancho Cucamonga full-time.
Approximately 8-9 officers go door-to-door enforcing the mandatory dog
license regulations and educating the public on animal control services and
programs. The animal license checkers are able to canvass approximately
75% of all single-family residences each year.
· Education pro.qrams: The Shelter has a very aggressive and successful
educational program. In Fiscal Year 2002-03, the following educational
programs took place in the City:
> 27 off-site pet adoption fairs that resulted in 77 dogs and 42 cats
finding a home. Each adoption includes a counseling session with the
prospective new pet owner to ensure that animals are placed into suitable
homes.
> 15 shelter tours were provided to groups with a total of 253 attendees
being educated about animal welfare issues.
> 2 informational booths were set up at community events, reaching 420
residents.
> 13 Humane Education Presentations were conducted at local schools
and businesses, educating 527 children and 43 adults about various topics
such as basic pet care, spaying/neutering, dog bite prevention, animal
groups, rabies prevention, and shelter functions.
> 13 press releases were sent out, informing residents about animal
welfare issues and other shelter services.
> 26 new educational materials were designed to help educate residents
about animal welfare issues. These materials are distributed to the
community through the adoption fairs, information booths, and via the
website. The County website has over 120 informational flyers on different
topics posted and available for downloading.
> 7 special events, such as Spay Day USA and Adopt a Shelter Dog
Month, draw attention to shelter and program activities.
> 5 volunteer orientations were conducted at the Shelter, resulting in 22
volunteers being trained during the year.
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 4 of 7
· Junior Helpers/Junior Volunteers: A new program implemented in March
2003, Junior Helpers (ages 10-14) and Junior Volunteers (ages 15-17)
participate in regularly scheduled meetings that include an educational
activity and an arts and crafts project or perform various volunteer tasks.
Last year 8 programs were conducted and there are currently 20 active youth
volunteers at the Shelter.
· RCTV-3: Slides providing Shelter information and spay/neuter information
are posted on RCTV-3.
· News articles: Both the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the Rancho
Cucamonga Voice (Los Angeles Times) currently run weekly adoptable pet
articles featuring animals from the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter.
Contacts provided by resident Nicole Myerchin facilitated the establishment
of this program in May 2003.
· Rescue qroups: County staff operating the Rancho Cucamonga Shelter
currently work with 21 different rescue organizations to save the lives of
Shelter animals. Before some animals are euthanized, staff will contact the
various rescue organizations to see if they can adopt the animal. The
adoption fee is waived in these situations. The addition of five more rescue
groups to this list is currently pending.
· Adoptable pets on the Web: All animals available for adoption can be viewed
on the County's website, which was redesigned and updated in May, 2003.
People looking for a new pet can filter their search by gender, age, or breed,
or they can browse all of the animals available at the Rancho Cucamonga,
Devore, and Big Bear Shelters. It is also possible to look for a lost pet on the
website.
· Be Kind to Animals Week: This specially designated week is commemorated
each year with a carnival and classic car show fund-raising event held at the
Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. The profits from the event are used for
special projects and to purchase additional equipment and supplies. The
2003 "Be Kind to Animals" event raised over $3,000 and adopted out 19
animals.
· Dedicated volunteers: The Shelter's volunteer program is focused on quality
rather than quantity. The screening process for Shelter volunteers is
probably more cumbersome than at other municipal shelter facilities, but
Shelter staff has found their process to be beneficial in keeping dedicated
volunteers for a longer pedod of time. All volunteers must attend an
interview, participate in a volunteer orientation session, take a test, and
complete individual training sessions prior to beginning their services at the
Shelter. In addition to several volunteers that help out periodically, the
Rancho Cucamonga Shelter currently has a core group of 11 very active
volunteers dedicated to providing assistance to the Shelter. Volunteer
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 5 of 7
activities include animal socializing/exercising, obedience training, dog
bathing, giving tours, searching newspaper ads and shelter reports to match
lost pets with their owners, contacting breed rescues groups, posting
identification cards on animal cages, and assisting the Health Educator at
school presentations, adoption fairs, and other events.
The services noted above and the efforts of the staff and volunteers have enabled
the Rancho Cucamonga Shelter to achieve some of the best adoption rates in the
County and provide an Animal Shelter program of which our community can be
proud. However, there is always reom for improvement. New services and
programs recently implemented include the following:
· New marketinq tools: A Pilot Program has been established implementing
several marketing techniques suggested by Mr. Michael Arms, Executive
Director of the Helen Woodward Animal Center. These actions include
pairing up kittens and giving them names such as "Bonnie & Clyde," placing
bandanas on adoptable animals, and mixing the dogs by color in the dog
runs. The effectiveness of these actions will be evaluated after two months.
· Public Service Announcements: Three public service announcements
(PSA's) related to Shelter services, adoption, and spay/neutering were filmed
for airing on Charter Cable and the City government access channel.
· Press releases facilitated: The press release process for the City's Shelter
was recently streamlined by having Shelter staff forward all related press
releases to our City Manager's Office. City staff edits the news releases to
include only information pertinent to the City, thereby removing the need for
the required County approvals. Turn-around time on press releases is now
hours rather than days.
The Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee has reviewed a number of additional
proposals and suggestions to enhance the services provided at the Animal Shelter.
Some of the programs and services considered by the Subcommittee include the
following:
· "Spaymobile": The Humane Society of San Bernardino Valley operates a
mobile spay/neuter and vaccination clinic. The Humane Society will bdng the
"Spaymobile" to areas of the City that are producing the most numbers of
unwanted animals. Daily cost of operation is $1,400 and the Humane
Society asks the City to pay half of that cost. Pdor to the date of the
"Spaymobile" operation, residents of the designated area receive
informational flyers, which include the benefits of spaying and neutering, the
fees involved, the scheduled time, date, and location of the "Spaymobile,"
and a phone number to make an appointment. The "Spaymobile" can
perform approximately 20 operations per day and offers Iow-cost
vaccinations in the afternoons.
· Voucher Proqram: Through a partnership with the non-profit Pet
Overpopulation Coalition (POPCO), the County currently provides spay and
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 6 of 7
neuter vouchers to residents living within the unincorporated areas of San
Bernardino County. The vouchers have a maximum value of $50 for dogs
and $25 for cats, and residents are allowed 3 dog vouchers and 3 cat
vouchers per lifetime. The residents take the vouchers to participating
veterinarians and use them toward the cost of altering services. The County
budgets $150,000 annually for this program to promote spaying/neutering of
animals in the County. The City of Fontana also currently offers a voucher
program to residents of their city. Cities set a maximum funding limit that
determines how many vouchers are released to residents in their community.
As an example, the City of Fontana has set a $50,000 annual limit on their
voucher program.
· Shelter Foster Care ProRram: City staff and representatives from County
Supervisor Biane's office met recently with two non-profit organizations to
learn about their animal foster care programs. We discussed with each
group the possibility of creating a partnership with the County and City to
establish such a program and the Supervisor's office is following up on this
potential opportunity.
The Animal Shelter Subcommittee has directed staff to continue to research these
and other programs to decrease pet overpopulation in our community and increase
the placement of shelter animals in new homes.
Recommendations
Since the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee was established in May, 2003, the
Subcommittee has toured the Shelter facility, met with both County and City staff to
thoroughly review the existing programs and services, and met with residents and
interested parties from animal care agencies to discuss new ideas and proposals
related to humane animal care. At the September 19, 2003 Subcommittee meeting,
the Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee approved the following recommendations
to the City Council:
> The City Council approve the use of contingency funds in the City's animal
shelter budget to provide services to the community that will facilitate the spay and
neutering of animals. The Subcommittee's recommendations are to use $5,000 in
contingency funds in the animal shelter budget to establish a voucher program and
use approximately $2,800 in this account to schedule quartedy visits of the
Spaymobile in our community.
~ Supervisor Biane's office has become very engaged in efforts to enhance the
services and programs provided to the community through the Animal Shelter. The
County is committed to establishing a non-profit 501(c)(3) designation in order to be
eligible to pursue additional funding via grants, fund raising events, and other
programs. The Subcommittee recommends the Council direct staff to provide
support of those efforts as needed and requested by the County.
October 15, 2003
Staff Report: Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Recommendations
Page 7 of 7
~ Direct staff to work with the County and Supervisor Biane's office to explore
shelter animal foster care programs and the feasibility of establishing such a
program at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter.
~ Direct staff to work closely with County staff at the Shelter to facilitate increased
promotion within our community for shelter programs and services, including
updating PSA's as needed, issuing press releases, posting informational slides on
RCTV3, and through outreach media such as the Grapevine.
~ The City Council adopt a resolution indicating the City's commitment to pursuing
the goal of finding homes for all adoptable animals at the Rancho Cucamonga
Animal Shelter. The draft resolution is attached for Council's consideration.
~ The Subcommittee and staff from the City and County continue to consult with
other animal care agencies such as POPCO, the Pet Assistance Foundation, the
Upland Shelter's volunteer organization HOPE (Helping Out Pets Everyday), and
other agencies to share ideas and work together to continue to enhance the animal
care and control services in our community.
~ The Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee meet quarterly as we continue to
partner with the County and the Supervisor's office in these pursuits; and then
provide updates on our progress to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
Michelle Dawson
Management Analyst III
Staff to City Manager/Animal Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AS A GOAL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO FIND HOMES FOR ALL
ADOPTABLE ANIMALS AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER SO THAT
NO ADOPTABLE ANIMAL IS EUTHANIZED AND TO DO SO BY WORKING WITH THE
CITIZENS OF THE CiTY TO REDUCE AND ELIMINATE THE BIRTHS OF UNWANTED
PETS.
WHEREAS, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals reports that
approximately 60% of dogs and 70% of cats entering shelters nationwide are euthanized;
and,
WHEREAS, the City contracts for animal shelter services with the County of San
Bernardino; and,
WHEREAS, through the efforts of the skilled and dedicated staff and volunteers at the
Shelter, the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter has adopted out or returned to their owners
86% of the adoptable dogs and 66% of the adoptable cats impounded at the Shelter so far in
2003; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council supports the concept of the adoption of all adoptable dogs and
cats; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the blight of pet overpopulation and
its impact on the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter; and
WHEREAS, the City commits to reduce pet overpopulation through appropriate regulations,
spay/neuter programs, and public humane education; and
WHEREAS, the City supports the spaying and neutering of dogs and cats as the primary
means of reducing pet overpopulation; and
WHEREAS, we can always do more as a community to prevent the killing of adoptable
pets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that:
It is the official goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to work with the County of San
Bernardino to find homes for all adoptable animals at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal
Shelter so that no adoptable animal is euthanized and to do so by working with the citizens
of the City to reduce and eliminate the births of unwanted pets.
Resolution No.
Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,2003.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the
day of ,2003.
Executed this day of ,2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
^ RESO.UT,ON EST^BL,S.,NG AS ^ GOAL O. THE C,T~ O. RANCHO CUCAMON~A
^DOPT^.LE ANIMUS ^T THE RAN°H° OUCAMON~^ ~IM^L S. ELTER SO T.AT
NO ADOPTABLE ANIMAL IS EUTHANIZED.
WHEREAS, the Amedcan Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals reports that
approximately 60% of dogs and 70% of cats entedng shelters nationwide are euthanized;
and,
WHEREAS, the City contracts for animal shelter services with the County of San
Bernardino; and,
WHEREAS, through the efforts of the skilled and dedicated staff and volunteers at the
Shelter, the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter has adopted out or returned to their owners
86% of the adoptable dogs and 66% of the adoptable cats impounded at the Shelter so far in
2003; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council supports the concept of the adoption of all adoptable dogs and
oats; and,
WHEREAS, we can always do more as a community to prevent the killing of adoptable pets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that:
It is the official goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to work with the County of San
Bernardino to find homes for all adoptable animals at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal
Shelter so that no adoptable animal is euthanized.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ., 2003.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Resolution No.
Page 2 of 2
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the __
day of ,2003.
Executed this __ day of ,2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
r~ a N C H 0 C u C a m 0 n G a
CO,II, IIi N I T¥
Staff Rel ort
DA'~: October 15, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Central Park:
· The project was awarded to Douglas E. Barnhart by City Council on September 17, 2003.
· Anticipated construction to begin on October 27, 2003.
Day Creek Park (Previously Rancho Etiwanda Park):
· The project was accepted by City Council on September 17, 2003.
· A dedication celebration was held on September 27, 2003.
Heritage Community Park:
· The "Carport" Construction Project is progressing. The photograph on the left provides an
idea of the construction that is occurring.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· The V.I.P. Club Trunk Show will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday, October 18, at
10:00 a.m. Don't miss this spectacular event that is sponsored by the V.I.P. Club. A light
salad luncheon will be served and you will get an up-close look at new fashions for fall and
winter seasons. Cost: $5 per person.
· Senior Advisory Committee will hold their next regular scheduled meeting on Monday,
October 27th, at 9:00 a.m. During the past month the Committee has worked tirelessly on
projects relating to fundraising for various aspects of the new Senior Center.
· The City of Rancho Cucamonga has teamed with San Antonio Community Hospital and San
Bernardino County Department of Public Health for the Center's annual Flu Shot Clinic to be
held at the R.C. Family Sports Center on Friday, October 31st at 8:00 a.m. The shots are
available for individuals 50 years of age and over on a first come, first served basis. San
Antonio Hospital will administer this free flu clinic. The clinic was moved to the RC Family
Sports Center to accommodate parking for the growing number of seniors requesting flu
shots.
· Our senior citizen Halloween Spooktacular will be held at the Senior Center on Thursday,
October 30th, starting at 10:00 a.m. Seniors are invited to come in costume. There will be
prizes and games for the mature ghosts and goblins. There will also be plenty of food,
entertainment and scary fun.
· A very special Veterans Day Tribute will be offered at the Senior Center on Tuesday,
November 11th at 10:00 a.m. This event will focus on the PBS original documentary "War
Letters", based on newly discovered personal correspondence from the Revolutionary War
to the Gulf War, "War Letters" brings to life vivid eyewitness accounts of famous baffles,
intimate declarations of love and longing, poignant letters penned just before the writer was
killed and heartbreaking "Dear John" letters from home. The event will also feature an
ROTC Color Guard, the Carl Schafer Quartet and refreshments. The event will be followed
by an ali-American lunch.
Human Services:
· The Senior Help Line, (909) 596-1111, is a free service which will guide one through the
maze of local senior services with quick and easy information about hundreds of agencies.
· The Inland Fair Housin.q Mediation Board can assist in providing information and mediation
for such services as applying for ADA certification, problems with the local transit system,
counseling for reverse mortgages and many other housing issues. For assistance please
call (909) 984-2254 or (800) 321-0911.
· Bereavement Support Group - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center has a Bereavement
Support Group that will start on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 from 1:00 p.m. until 2:30 p.m.
This group will work with individuals of all ages looking for guidance in coping with their
grief.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
· Free One-on-One Computer Lessons for Seniors - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center
is providing free one-on-one computer lessons to seniors 55 years of age and older.
Students will learn how to surf the Internet, setup a free e-mail account, play computer
games and track their stocks and anything else they are interested in. We have extended
our hours due to the popularity of this program. Appointments are available every Fdday
morning from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. and Friday afternoon from 3:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m.
Each lesson runs approximately 50 minutes. Registration is required and you may sign-up
as many times as you would like.
Trips and Tours:
· Julian - October 4, 2003. Julian is a premier mountain getaway, just an hour east of San
Diego, in the beautiful Cuyamaca Mountains. Take a step back in time to the days of
Julian's beginning rooted in the 1870's gold rush. Get away from the hectic rush of city life.
.. discover the charms of Julian. Enjoy small streets lined with charming handicraft shops,
boutiques, country inns and the Julian Pioneer Museum. Shop and have lunch (on you
own). Cost: $24.00 per person.
· Edwards Air Force Base: Open House and Air Show - October 26, 2003. The year 2003
marks the 100th year of powered flight! Edwards Air Force Base will celebrate the
Centennial of Flight (1903 - 2003) by paying tribute to ail those who developed, acquired
and sustained the air and space power needed to defend the United States. Featuring the
U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds. For more than 50 years, Edwards Air Force Base - home of
the Air Force Flight Test Center - has been the home of more milestones in flight than any
other place on earth. Edwards Air Force Base is also the back-up site of NASA's space
shuttle. The Visitors Center features objects from historic space missions. Cost: $26.00 per
person.
· NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory - November 10, 2003. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(JPL), managed by the California Institute of Technology, is NASA's lead center for the
robotic exploration of the solar system. JPL spacecraft have visited all of the planets in our
solar system except Pluto. JPL telescopes are observing distant galaxies in the universe to
study how our solar system was formed. JPL also manages the worldwide Deep Space
Network, which communicates with spacecraft and conducts scientific investigations from its
complexes in the Mojave Desert Near Gold Stone; near Madrid, Spain; and near Canberra,
Australia. JPL cameras and sensors are aboard satellites circling Earth to study the ozone,
oceans and other Earth sciences. JPL is making advances in technology with new
instruments and computer programs to help the spaceships travel further and the telescopes
see farther than ever before. On the way home it will be lunch (on your own) at Beadles
Cafeteria in Pasadena. Cost: $26.00 per person.
Volunteer Services:
The table on the following page summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer
usa.qe for the month of August 2003 and year-to-date:
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
Month: August 2003 YEAR TO DATE
~of ~of
Volunteers ~ of Hours $ Value Volunteers ~ of Hours ~ Value
Admin 5 15 210 39 175 2,450
Sports 172 2,750 38,500 981 7,822 109,508
;r & Human 55 455 6,370 421 2,950 41,300
Services
Special 41 826 11,564 162 1,370 18,816
Events
Youth 81 737 10,318 975 5,026 65,567
Programs
I 354 I 4,783 I 66,962 I 2,578 I 17,343 I 237,641
*Based on $t4 per hour
Teens:
· The table below summarizes teen preqram participation for the month of September 2003:
Program Attendance/ParUcipation --September 2003
Teen Center 953
Homework Room 33 participants; 38.5 hours of operation
TRAC Snack Bars 5 participants; 27.5 volunteer hours
TRAC Babysitting 66 participants; 14 volunteer hours
Spruce Skate Facility 1,050 users
Northtown Collaborative - Teen Dance - 42 participants;
Activities/Events Babysitters Workshop - 7 participants
· The annual Knott's Scary Farm trip took place on October 4th. This trip is one of the teen's
favorites. The night is full of hair-raising rides, suspense-filled shows and terrifying
attractions.
· The annual Colleqe Fair is scheduled for Thursday, October 16th from 6:30 p.m. until 8:30
p.m. at the R.C. Family Sports Center. We anticipate 72 colleges/universities and 2,800
attendees. This event is the perfect opportunity for students and their parents to talk with a
college representative and to receive important information on admissions, academic
programs, financial aid and support programs.
· The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) is in full swing for the school year. Their first
social is scheduled to be held on October 15th and they will have a snack bar at the teens
Monster Bash Dance on October 25th.
· The Spruce Park Skate Facility - Staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to
promote safe skating by handing out donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing
their proper gear.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
Youth Activities:
· A Halloween Family Feat will be held on October 31st from 5:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. at the
Epicenter Special Event Area. The event will include: carnival rides, pumpkin carving,
entertainment, games and contests, pony rides, a petting zoo, craft stations, craft vendors,
food concessions. Cost: $5.00 per person pre-sale; $8.00 per person on the day of the
event. This event is co-sponsored by Lewis Apartment Communities.
· The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a fun neighborhood event.
This past month, 408 children were served through the program at 5 park sites. The current
program schedule shown below will continue through December 19~, Monday through
Friday from 2:30 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.
Weekday Park Location
~,~l~.~e]~.~3.~..~j~ Monday Bear Gulch Park
Tuesday Old Town Park
-=~ Wednesday Hermosa Park
~--'-,"-~-~---" Thursday Mountain View Park
Friday Elena Park
Grants:
· Youth Enrichment Services (YES) Proqram - The table below illustrates
attendance/participation figures for programs/services provided through the YES Grant for
the month of September 2003.
Program September Attendance/Participation
Mulberry Early Learning FACTS Center 473
Lions East FACTS Center 1,333
Parent Education Classes 9 classes; 50 in attendance
Car Seat Checks 163
Youth Sports:
· The next Sports Advisory Committee met on October 8th to turn in field allocation request
materials for the spring 2004 (February 1, 2004-July 31, 2004field allocation. The next
meeting of the Committee will be held on November 12th. At this meeting the Committee will
review staff's spring 2004 field allocation proposal.
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Soccer 420 3-5/boys & girls 42
Youth Flag Football 220 6-14/boys & girls 20
Youth Roller Hockey 175 6-16 boys & girls 16
Youth Volleyball 72 8-14 boys & girls 8
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity # of Participants
Adult Basketball 285
Youth Basketball 807
Adult Racquetball 371
Youth Ra~uetball 33
Adult Volleyball 44
Youth Volleyball 247
Jazzercise 1,228
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting pedod:
Activity # of Participants [ Age/Gender # Teams
Racquetball 26I Adult/Males N/A
Basketball (full court) 90 Adult/Males 9
Basketball (3-on-3) 48 Adult/Males 8
Adult Sports:
· Three (3) adult softball tournaments are scheduled to place at the Epicenter and Adult
Sports Complex during the month of October 2003.
· Thirty-five (35) adults are participating in our tennis leaRues.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting pedod:
Activity # of Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,720 170 Males/Females
Soccer Fields down for renovation
Flag Football Fields down for renovation
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport lea.ques. For the reporting period,
10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 71,624 participants and 118,583
spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times.
Community Wide Special Events:
· Day Creek Park was officially opened to the community on Saturday, September 27th. This
Ribbon Cutting event was held from 10:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. and over 450 residents
attended and enjoyed our City's newest park amenities. The event included inflatable
activities, fun activities for the children and free hot dogs, chips and soda.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
A Central Park Groundbreakin,q is scheduled for Monday, October 13th at 10:00 a.m. The
celebration will take place on the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue.
Founders Niqht Gala - The Community Foundation's signature fundraising event will
celebrate our heritage and the future of the arts this year. The event will take place on
Saturday, November 1, 2003, at Etiwanda Gardens. This year's event will close out the
City's yearlong celebration of our Silver Anniversary and will celebrate our heritage and the
future of the arts in our community. Proceeds from this event will benefit the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center.
· Our 26th annual Founders Day.Parade will take place on Saturday, November 8~. This
year's theme is Dreams of Excellence. The parade begins at 9:30 a.m. at Archibald and
Base Line Road and continues eastward on Base Line to Vineyard Avenue. Our judging
stand will be at Amethyst. An awards ceremony will take place at Red Hill Community Park
following the parade.
· The Community Services Department in collaboration with Lewis Retail Centers will host a
Tree Liqhtinq and Holiday Celebration for the community on Thursday, November 20, 2003.
This event will start at 5:30 p.m. in the Terra Vista Towne Center-food court area and will
include an evening full of entertainment, holiday excitement and a visit from Santa and Mrs.
Clause.
Performing and Cultural Arts:
· Two theatre classes, Youth Theatre and The Young Actor's Workshop began a fall session
in September with a maximum class capacity, reaffirming the interest for theatre
programming for youth. The Youth Theatre program, taught by Allison Dugan, exceeded its
20-student capacity with an additional 3 youngsters. The Young Actors Workshop, a 6-
week course taught by our own community theatre director John LaLonde, filled his class
with 20 students who are all anxious to learn musical theatre and comedy techniques.
Parks and Facilities:
· The table below and on the next page provides information on park/special use facility
reservations for the month of September 2003:
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications Processed of
Rentals
Red Hill 2,535 39 48 196
Community Park Picnic
Shelters
Heritage Community 1,119 20 21 85
Park Picnic Shelters
Hermosa Park Picnic 326 11 14 47
Shelter
Milliken Park Picnic 1,431 16 19 77
Shelter
Coyote Canyon Park 300 7 12 36
Picnic Shelter
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications Processed of
Rentals
Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0
Amphitheater 295 2 2 7
Equestrian Center 295 2 2 7
Total 6,301 97 118 455
Not available due to Civic Center construction project.
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
. Equestrian Center usa,qe for the month of October 2003 is shown in the table below:
Group Date EventJTime Frame
Alta Loma Riding Club O~ober 2n~ Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p.m.
Civic Use October 7~ Election Polling Site/7:00a.m.-9:00p.m.
Rising Stars of October 18t" California Disabled Show/8:00a.m.-5:00p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
4-H Club October 25t~ Halloween Show/8:00a.m.-5:00p.m.
4-H Club October 20t~ General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:00p.m.
Facilities:
· The table below illustrates hours of service, number of bookings and attendance at Lions
East and West Community Centers dudng the month of September 2003.
Facility Hours of Number of Attendance
Service Rentals
Lions East Community Center 473 122 5,760
Lions West Community Center 728 179 7,554
· Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the e~uestrian center to address
maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and
supportive of the City's efforts.
· Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in
need of assistance.
Departmental I City Marketing:
· The City participated in the Victoria Gardens Mall Groundbreaking with the encouragement
of Forest City Developers by creating a display of the upcoming Victoria Gardens Cultural
Center with photos of the building model, artist renderings and floor plans. At Forest City's
request, a small group of members from The Kids Culture Company were on hand with their
Company shirts, hard hats and Forest City supplied golden shovels to participate with
Council and Forest City in turning over the first shovels full of dirt. The Kids Cultural
Company was a hit with the crowd and the local media.
· Pins for the Cultural Center have been created and are being distributed by those involved
in the project to promote awareness for the Center.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
· Staff continues to contribute to the Los Anqles Times RCVoice newspaper with articles
regarding Community Services' programs and events.
· The Community Services Marketing Manager served as Media Chairperson for the Mark
Christopher Charity Classic Golf Tournament held September 22 - 28 at the Empire Lakes
Golf Course. Staff worked the Media Tent the entire week working with the Media, The Golf
Channel representatives, PGA Officials and players.
Production of three 30-second cemmercials was cempleted and the commemials aired on
The Golf Channel each day dudng this Tournament. Additional 30-second vignettes
regarding the City of Rancho Cucamonga with focus on: "Commerce", "Destinations",
"Community", "Location" and "Future" were created to provide to The Golf Channel as
"filler" spots for them to run at no additional cost to us. Several of these vignettes were
played' during the tournament and several commercials were replayed as well during the
extended play coverage the Tournament received.
Completion of these 30-second commercial spots was perfect timing as staff was able to
ship a tape with copies of the vignettes to ESPN for possible aidng dudng the Vineyard Little
League quest for the Little League World Series. Footage from the spots was aired with the
on-air announcer providing demographic information that was also provided with the tape.
Staff was on hand on Thursday, September 25, 2003 when Mayor Bill Alexander presented
the on-site Executive Producer from The Golf Channel with a Key to the City at an
appreciation dinner held for The Golf Channel staff hosted by the Mark Christopher Charity
Classic. The Golf Channel indicated to the entire crowd that this was the first time in the
history of The Golf Channel the crew has been given an appreciation dinner and the first
time The Golf Channel has ever received a Key to the City. This gesture went a long way
with The Golf Channel crew resulting and provided positive relations with the crew.
Epicenter Marketing:
· The Golf Channel crew utilized the Epicenter Stadium to play a casual game of softball
amongst their crew having 30 years of age and older play the 29 and younger crowd on
Friday, September 26, 2003. This was a great public relations move as they filmed a portion
of the game and aired this footage during Sunday Tournament coverage, along with a clip
from the ESPN footage of the Vineyard Little League during their Little World Series playoff
game, stating the Epicenter Stadium is a "world class facility" located in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The Park and Recreation Commission will meet next on October 16th. At this meeting the
following items will be discussed/acted upon by the Commission:
· Update on Senior Advisory Committee.
· Update on Sports Advisory Committee.
· Update on Central Park Project.
· Annual review of the Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating
to recreation activities, programs and services.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
October 15, 2003
· Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project.
· Approval of street banner applications and schedules for calendar year 2004.
· Consideration of formation of a Central Park/Park and Recreation Commission Sub-
Committee.
· Update and status of community theatre program.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The following items were discussed at the Community Foundation's October 14, 2003
meetinq:
· Update on the Cultural Center Project.
· Foundation Members update on solicitation efforts for the PAL Campaign for the
Cultural Center Project.
· Update regarding plans for the 2003 Founder's Gala to be held November 1,2003.
· Consideration of waiver of the November 11, 2003, regular meeting and calling of a
special meeting due to the Veterans' Day holiday.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· The following activity took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period:
· Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Carnival and Grape Harvest Festival
- October 2-5, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
· Active Ride - Skate Demonstration and Safety Clinic - October 11, 2003 - Epicenter
Special Event Area.
· Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the
Epicenter:
· Community Services Department/Lewis Apartment Communities - Halloween Family
Fest- October 31, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
· Okoye Foundation/Quakes - Holiday Youth Event - December 13, 2003- Epicenter
and Adult Sports Complex (soccer fields and parking lots).
· Beginning in October the EPicenter Stadium fields will be down for their annual renovation.
This will impact the availability of the venue for rentals from October through January 2004.
Respe~ ~itted, ~
Kevin I ~rdle Joe O'Neil
Community Services Director City Engineer
k~COMMSERV~Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffRep°rtst2OO3~update 10.15. 03. doc