HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-10-25 - Agenda Packet
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
October 25, 2023
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Chair Dopp
Vice Chair Morales
Commissioner Williams
Commissioner Boling
Commissioner Daniels
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Commission (“Planning
Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the
Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included
on the agenda, but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 11, 2023.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D1. DESIGN REVIEW – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS - A request to demolish an existing office/warehouse
building and its associated parking lot/outdoor storage area and construct two industrial/warehouse
buildings totaling 74,387 square-feet within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District, located on the north side of
6th Street between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at 9910 6th Street; APNs: 0209-211-42
and -43. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) under CEQA Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2022-00301).
D2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – CAL MICRO RECYCLING, LLC - A request to establish a mattress
recycling and processing facility within an existing 58,543 square foot industrial building within the
Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, located east of Hermosa Avenue and north of 4th Street at 9669 Hermosa
Avenue; APN: 0210-371-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (Conditional Use
Permit DRC2023-00226).
E. DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
F. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. ADJOURNMENT
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,
given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may
present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience
should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing
impaired.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After
speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your
name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited
to 3 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.”
As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed
to the Commissioners and included in the record.
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s
Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,365 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established
and governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session.
I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least Seventy-Two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California and on the City's website.
HPC/PC MINUTES – October 11, 2023
Page 1 of 4
Draft
2
8
3
1
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission Agenda
October 11, 2023
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on October
11, 2023. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Vice Chair Morales, Commissioner Williams, Commissioner
Boling, and Commissioner Daniels.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning;
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Brian Sandona, Senior Civil
Engineer; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chair Dopp opened the public communications.
Cameron Miles Reed, Resident, spoke about the Pacific Electric Depot Etiwanda and requested to be
involved in depot restoration.
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, stated someone from staff will be in contact with Mr. Reed.
Hearing no other comments, Chair Dopp closed public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1.Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2023.
Motion to adopt Meeting Minutes as presented by Commissioner Boling; second by Commissioner Daniels;
Motion carried 5-0.
D. Public Hearings
D1. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, DESIGN REVIEW, MINOR EXCEPTION & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT –
MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 9.14 acres of land into 22 lots including the Design Review
of 22 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights, and a Tree Removal Permit
to remove onsite trees for a project site located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda and Highland
Avenues in the Low (L) Residential Zone (2 - 4 Dwelling Units per Acre); APN: 0227- 151-03. A CEQA
Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum has been prepared for this project. Related files: Tentative
Tract Map SUBTT20566, Design Review DRC2022-00348, Minor Exception DRC2022- 00349, and
Tree Removal Permit DRC2022-00350.
HPC/PC MINUTES – October 11, 2023
Page 2 of 4
Draft
2
8
3
1
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, provided Commissioners with Staff Report and PowerPoint
presentation. (Copy on file). He noted that revisions to each of the resolutions were provided on the dias
that clarify that the subdivision includes 22 numbered lots and 2 lettered lots.
Chair Dopp opened Public Hearing.
Michael Manning, Applicant, thanked the Commission and hope the project meets with their approval. He also
introduced Craig Kozma who was available to answer any questions.
Commissioner Daniels asked who owns the lot on the north side.
Michael Manning answered that Caltrans owns that parcel, but Manning is conditioned to improve the right-
away frontage along the northside of Highland. He said they plan to improve the curb, gutter, and assured it
will look much nicer.
Commissioner Daniels asked what is flex space in Plan 1 floor plan.
Michael Manning explained that flex space could be different types of rooms as a craft room, home office or
gym.
Chair Dopp asked what the expected pricing will be for these homes.
Michael Manning replied that final pricing has yet to be determined. They are in escrow on the final two houses
on East Avenue. A two-story unit is in escrow for $1,755,000 and a single-story unit is in escrow for $1,695,000.
No comments from the public, Chair Dopp Closed Public Hearing.
Commissioner Boling asked staff regarding Resolution 22-23, Section B.2.e; references project site as 10.4
acres of land but throughout staff report and resolutions it indicates 9.14.
Tabe van der Zwaag replied that it should be 9.14 and will be corrected.
Commissioner Daniels asked about Lots 10 and 11 and said there is a retention infiltration system on private
property, underneath the driveway, how is that maintained.
Brian Sandona answered as a condition of approval, the project is required to maintain it privately under HOA.
Vice Chair Morales expressed his gratitude that they are spending a lot of money to preserve and rebuild the
rock curb. The project will fit in with the city and its standards we are trying to set. He is in support of the
project.
Commissioner Williams stated it will be a very nice project and she is in support.
Chair Dopp commented that he was pleased to see an alternative to a traditional cul-de-sac, with homes
surrounding a public space and it addresses some of the principals that we envisioned in the General Plan. It’s
a good element that would be a great model for future subdivisions moving forward.
HPC/PC MINUTES – October 11, 2023
Page 3 of 4
Draft
2
8
3
1
Motion by Commissioner Boling to adopt Resolutions 23-19, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20566; 23-20 Design
Review DRC2022-00348; 23-21 Minor Exception DRC2022-00349; 23-22 Tree Removal Permit DRC2022-
00350 with revisions to include 22 numbered lots and 2 lettered lots and the revision to Resolution 22-23,
Section B.2.e to reflect the project area of 9.14 acres. Second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 5-0.
D2. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE - Consideration to Recommend Approval to the City Council of
Zoning Text Amendments to Articles II, III, V, VIII, and IX of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code that will Include the Addition of a New Section for Major Exceptions, the
Addition of New Subzone to the Summary Table and Land Use, Clarifications to Various Development
Standards including updates to Drive-Thru Use and Service Station Standards, New Standards for
Subdivisions in the Form Based Code, Adjustments to Open Space Requirements, and Additional
Typographic and Formatting Amendments, and Recommendation of Zoning Map Amendments to
Specific Parcels for Consistency with the General Plan (“PlanRC”). An Addendum to the General Plan
Update and Climate Action Plan FEIR has been prepared for this project (Zoning Map Amendment
DRC2023-00317; Municipal Code Amendment DRC2023-00318)
Jennifer Nakamura announced that a letter requesting a continuance for this item was received this morning
and distributed to the commission. Staff requests that the commission open the public hearing and continue
this item to the November 8th meeting to allow staff to engage with the interested party to review and fully
understand the potential development code amendments being proposed.
Chair Dopp opened Public Hearing.
No comments from the public, Chair Dopp stated item will remain open and it will be continued to November
8th meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Boling; Second by Commissioner Williams to continue this item to the November 8th
meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
F. Director Announcements
Jennifer Nakamura mentioned we will have items for the next agenda in October.
G. Commission Announcements
Commissioner Daniels asked if staff could look at the use of palm trees within the community. A lot of cities
are banning palm trees. No urgency. Also, relating to the Manning development; on the water district site -
south side, there are a lot of trees in bad shape. Request for staff to contact the water district to clean that
site up.
Jennifer Nakamura stated they will look at the palm trees with regards to whether we continue to use them. It
is something that may be part of our Urban Forest Management Plan and a tree ordinance may be included.
She said they will contact the water district to have the adjacent site be looked at.
H. Adjournment
Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Boling to adjourn the meeting. Hearing
no objections, Chair Dopp adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
HPC/PC MINUTES – October 11, 2023
Page 4 of 4
Draft
2
8
3
1
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning and Economic Development Department
Approved:
DATE:October 25, 2023
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development
INITIATED BY:Bond Mendez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:DESIGN REVIEW – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS - A request to demolish an existing
office/warehouse building and its associated parking lot/outdoor storage area and
construct two industrial/warehouse buildings totaling 74,387 square-feet within the Neo-
Industrial (NI) Zone, located on the north side of 6th Street between Archibald Avenue
and Hermosa Avenue at 9910 6th Street; APNs: 0209-211-42 and-43. This item is exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA
Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects (DRC2022-00301).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2022-00301 through the adoption
of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
BACKGROUND:
The 4.54-acre project site was previously used as a recycling facility with a large parking lot/outdoor storage
area. The building and its associated parking/outdoor storage area will be demolished as part of this project. The
rectangular project site has dimensions of about 315 feet (east to west) and 520 feet (north to south). A majority
of the site is paved with a parking lot/outdoor storage area and existing vegetation is limited along the site’s
frontage along 6th Street.
Page 2 of 7
2
0
7
2
Figure 1: Location of subject property on 6th Street
Aerial View
Page 3 of 7
2
0
7
2
The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are
shown on Table 1:
Table 1: Land Use Information
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Office/Warehouse and
Outdoor Storage Area
Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
North Industrial/Warehouse Industrial
Employment Industrial Employment (IE)
South Industrial/Warehouse Industrial
Employment Industrial Employment (IE)
East Industrial Complex Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
West Industrial Complex Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes to construct two industrial buildings totaling 74,387 square feet (see Figure 2). Building
1 measures 25,635 square feet and is located toward the southerly portion of the site, closest to 6th Street.
Building 2 measures 48,752 square feet and is located toward the northerly portion of the site. No specific uses
are currently proposed for either of the two buildings. The site will be accessed via two driveways from 6th Street.
The parking and loading areas for Building 1 will not be gated, while the rear parking and loading dock area of
Building 2 will be gated. The applicant previously submitted a request for a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) to
reconfigure the existing property line between the two parcels. The lot line adjustment is necessary to develop
the two new buildings on the site as proposed otherwise the existing property line would conflict with building
placement. The lot line adjustment is under concurrent, administrative review and the project is conditioned to
require the lot line adjustment be recorded prior to building permit issuance.
Page 4 of 7
2
0
7
2
Figure 2: Site Plan
The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of three colors. The building
will have form-lined concrete panels at various locations. Additionally, the application of varying façade planes,
windows and glass panels along the building’s office frontages adds architectural interest to the façade. The
glass paneling and color treatments creates not only a focal point for the buildings but also a celebrated entryway
(Figure 3).
Figure 3: Southeast corner of property, viewpoint from 6th Street
The project meets the intent of the Neo-Industrial land use designation of the General Plan, which is intended to
Page 5 of 7
2
0
7
2
provide for light industrial uses that result in low environmental impacts. The proposed buildings meet this intent
by constructing smaller sized buildings that could accommodate a variety of low-impact industrial uses.
Landscaping is generally distributed along the project’s 6th Street frontage toward the southerly portion of the
site and within the building’s parking areas. All trees proposed along the public right-of-way and within the subject
property are at least 24-inch box in size, in compliance with the Development Code. The project will be
conditioned to incorporate landscape lighting along its street frontage to enhance the site’s nighttime aesthetics.
The incorporation of lighting and landscaping provides territorial reinforcement as well as natural access control
to the site and acts as a transition zone between the public right-of-way and the private site. The project complies
with all pertinent standards in the Neo Industrial (NI) zone, as demonstrated in the Table 2:
Table 2: Development Standards
*Max 70 feet as long as building is set back 1 foot from front setback for every 1-foot building height exceeds 35 feet.
Parking: Per table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is based on the proposed mix
of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. Parking areas for the two buildings are evenly distributed
across the entire project site, and all truck loading and truck trailer parking areas are located away from public
view. Required parking for the project was calculated with the assumption that both buildings will be tenanted
with a warehouse use and an ancillary office. Based on the minimum parking requirement calculations, building
1 will require 36 parking stalls and building 2 will require 65 parking stalls. Therefore, the project will require a
total of 101 vehicle parking stalls. The project provides 101 stalls, meeting the parking requirement with the
minimum parking provided for each building on its own respective parcel. There are a total of 7 dock doors
proposed between the two buildings. Therefore, a matching number of trailer parking stalls are also provided in
compliance with Development Code requirements. Table 3 breaks down the parking calculation:
Development Standard Required Proposed In Compliance?
Floor Area Ratio Max 0.6 0.38 YES
Front Setback – Bicycle
Corridor/Local Street Min. 25’91’-5”YES
Interior Side Setback Min. 5’37’YES
Rear Setback Min. 0’56’-7”YES
Building Height Max 70’39’YES
Open Space / Landscape
Area Min. 10% 12.27% YES
Page 6 of 7
2
0
7
2
Table 3: Parking Analysis
Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Morales and Daniels)
on April 4, 2023. The Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission with
a minor change in color scheme to better fit within the surrounding industrial developments. The applicant has
submitted revised plans based on the feedback provided which is included as Exhibit C to this report.
Public Art: Pursuant to the Development Code Chapter 17.124 – Design Provisions for Public Art, the project is
subject to the City’s public art ordinance and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a
minimum value of one dollar per square foot of commercial, office, or industrial development which results in
$74,387; or pay an in-lieu fee to the City’s public art fund equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise
be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that
requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The Planning and Economic Development Department staff has determined that the project is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a
Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following
reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General
Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development
occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses,
(3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the
project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the
site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neo-Industrial Employment District
and Neo-Industrial zone, respectively, which permits the development and operation of a warehouse/distribution
building of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City’s development standards and
design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located
within the City limits on a site less than 5 acres and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City
infrastructure. The following are the four environmental factors that were analyzed to determine that the project
qualifies for the Class 32 Exemption.
Type of Use Square Footage
(Bldg 1 & 2)
Parking Ratio # of
Spaces
Required
# of
Spaces
Provided
Office 12,000
(3,500 & 8,500)4/1,000 sf 48 48
Warehouse 62,387
(22,135 & 40,252)
1 per 1,000 sf for first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000
sf for the next 20,000
sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf
for the remaining sf
53 53
Total 101 101
Page 7 of 7
2
0
7
2
1. Traffic: The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis (Kimley-
Horn & Associates Inc., November 2022) was prepared for the project which determined that the
number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed
warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 127 daily trips with 13 AM peak hour trips and 14
PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday. The analysis also determined that for Passenger
Car Equivalent (PCE) volumes estimate 174 PCE trips with 16 AM peak hour PCE trips and 18 PM
peak hour PCE trips occurring on a typical weekday. The Project would generate a low number of
daily traffic and peak hour trips and would not cause a measurable operational effect on local
roadways. Therefore, the proposed Project is not expected to generate 50 or more trips during the
AM or PM peak hour and does not require a traffic study. The Project also includes a parking
management plan (Urban Crossroads, December 2022) to mitigate any potential parking conflicts.
2. Noise: A Noise and Vibration Analysis Report was prepared for the project (Kimley-Horn & Associates
Inc., January 2023). The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise and
vibration levels would not exceed the City’s noise thresholds and no mitigation measures were
necessary.
3. Air Quality: Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., January 2023),
emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not exceed South Coast
Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) significance thresholds. It was determined that the
project would not exceed screening levels established by the California Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment.
4. Water Quality: The project includes a grading and drainage plan consistent with City regulations, as
well as Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the Project (SDH & Associates, Inc., August 2022).
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on October 12, 2023.
The property was posted, and notices were mailed to 149 property owners within a 1,500-foot radius of the
project site on October 11, 2023. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
General Plan Policy LC-1.9 encourages new development projects to be built on vacant and underutilized
properties through flexible design requirements and potential incentives. The proposed industrial warehouse
buildings will enhance our premier community status by providing two well-designed warehouse buildings that
are complementary to the surrounding land uses and will provide additional employment opportunities for City
residents and the region. The project will fulfill the City Council goal of intentionally embracing and anticipating
for our future by providing well-developed warehouses to accommodate the growing need for varied industrial
businesses in the City.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Project Plans
Exhibit B – Environmental Analysis
Exhibit C – April 4, 2023 Design Review Committee Minutes
Exhibit D – Draft Resolution
Exhibit E – Draft Conditions of Approval
DRC 2022-00301
DRC 2022-00301
DRC 2022-00301
DRC 2022-00301
DRC 2022-00301
DRC 2022-00301
1
1
2
2
2
FOUNDATION PLANTING / HEDGE SCREEN - MED WATER - 5 GAL
Buxus microphylla japonica `Green Beauty` / Green Beauty Boxwood
Ligustrum texanum / Texas Privet
Podocarpus gracilior `Column` / Fern Pine
Xylosma congestum / Shiny Xylosma
SMALL SCALE FOUNDATION PLANTING - LOW WATER - 5 GAL
Callistemon citrinus `Little John` / Dwarf Bottle Brush
Eleagnus pungens / Silverberry
Leucophyllum frutescens `Green Cloud` TM / Green Cloud Texas Ranger
Rosmarinus officinalis `Tuscan Blue` / Tuscan Blue Rosemary
Westringia fruticosa / Coast Rosemary
SMALLER ACCENT SHRUBS IN GRAVEL - 5 GAL - LOW WATER
Agave desmettiana `Variegata` / Variegated Agave
Agave x 'Blue Flame' / Blue Flame Agave
Aloe striata / Coral Aloe
Bougainvillea x `Rosenka" / Rosenka Bougainvillea
Callistemon citrinus `Little John` / Dwarf Bottle Brush
Hesperaloe parviflora / Red Yucca
Lantana x `New Gold` / New Gold Lantana
Muhlenbergia capillaris `Autumn Blush` / Pink Muhly
Olea europaea `Little Ollie` TM / Little Ollie Olive
Salvia greggii `Furmans Red` / Furman`s Red Salvia
CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT WUCOLS QTY
Koelreuteria bipinnata / Chinese Flame Tree 24"box Med 4
Koelreuteria bipinnata / Chinese Flame Tree Multi-Trunk 36"box Med 9
Magnolia grandiflora 'St. Mary' / St. Mary Southern Magnolia 24"box Med 6
Pinus eldarica / Afghan Pine 24"box Low 14
SIZE - 24" BOX - WATER USE - WULCOL - LOW
Podocarpus gracilior / Fern Pine 24"box Med 33
Tristania conferta / Brisbane Box 24"box Med 29
TREE LEGEND
ACCENT SHRUBS - LOW WATER USE - 5 GAL.
Agave desmettiana `Variegata` / Variegated Agave
Agave x `Blue Flame` / Blue Flame Agave
Callistemon citrinus `Little John` / Dwarf Bottle Brush
Leucophyllum frutescens `Green Cloud` TM / Green Cloud Texas Ranger
Muhlenbergia capillaris / Pink Muhly
Muhlenbergia capillaris `Autumn Blush` / Pink Muhly
Rosmarinus officinalis `Tuscan Blue` / Tuscan Blue Rosemary
Salvia clevelandii `Allen Chickering` / Cleveland Sage
Salvia greggii `Furmans Red` / Furman`s Red Salvia
Westringia fruticosa / Coast Rosemary
SHRUB PALETTE - MEDIUM WATER USE
Buxus x `Green Gem` / Green Gem Boxwood
Ligustrum texanum / Texas Privet
Rosa floribunda `Iceberg` / Iceberg Rose
Xylosma congestum / Shiny Xylosma
GROUND COVER PALETTE - LOW WATER USE - 1 GAL
Acacia redolens `Desert Carpet` TM / Bank Catclaw Space 4` o.c.
Baccharis pilularis `Pigeon Point` / Coyote Brush - Space 4` o.c.
Myoporum parvifolium `Putah Creek` / Putah Creek Myoporum Space 3` o.c.
Rosmarinus officinalis `Huntington Carpet` / Huntington Carpet Rosemary - Space 3` o.c.
GROUND COVER PALETTE - MEDIUM WATER USE - 1 GAL
Rosa x `Flower Carpet Pink` / Rose
Rosa x `Flower Carpet Red` / Rose
Trachelospermum jasminoides / Star Jasmine
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
3" THICK X 3/4" DECORATIVE GRAVEL - MOJAVE GOLD OVER
WEED BARRIER
6"X6" CONCRETE MOW CURB TO SEPARATE SHRUB AREAS FROM
DECORATIVE GRAVEL
1
2
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
EARTHWORKS (951)782-0260
SHREDDED MULCH NOTE
ALL PLANTER AREAS TO RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED COVER MULCH AVAILABLE FROM
BOTH DIRECTIONS FOR A TOTAL OF 10'
1. ALL TREES WITHIN 6' OF HARDSCAPE SHALL BE IN A SHAWTOWN LINEAR (WRAP AROUND NOT ALLOWED)
ROOT BARRIER 24" HIGH LINEAR ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE CENTERED ON TREE AND EXTEND 5' IN
NOTES
2. NOTE: QUANTITIES AND AREA CALCULATIONS SHOWN IN LEGEND ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY .
CONTRACTOR REPONSIBLE FOR ALL QUANTITY TAKE-OFFS AND AREA CALCULATIONS FOR
DETERMINING COST AND DELIVERY OF MATERIALS TO SITE.
THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS WILL GOVERN.
ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING STREET TREES, SHALL BE INSTALLED
PER THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS,
CITY NOTE:
01-19-23
RGA00168
1
BFK 9910 6TH STREET9910 6TH STREETRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA4740 GREEN RIVER SUITE 118 CORONA, CA 92880PH: 951-582-9800L-1PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANPROPOSED BUILDING 1
16TH STREETPROPOSED BUILDING 2
P.L.P.L.
P.L.P.L.
P.L.
EXISTING BLOCK WALL EXISTING BLOCK WALL
EXISTING BLOCK WALL
P.L.
NEW 8'-0" HIGH BLACK TUBE STEEL FENCE
OFFICE AREA
OFFICE AREA
ACCENT PAVING
AT OFFICE ENTRY
ACCENT PAVING
AT OFFICE ENTRY
BREAK / LUNCH PATIO
W/ PATIO COVER
BIKE RACK
BIKE RACK
BREAK / LUNCH PATIO
W/ PATIO COVER
DOCK DOORSDOCK DOORSTRANSFORMER
TRANSFORMER
27' EASEMENT17' EASEMENT
ACCENT PAVING AT DRIVE ENTRY
ACCENT PAVING
AT DRIVE ENTRYSIDEWALK
SIDEWALKNEW 8'-0" HIGH BLACK
TUBE STEEL FENCE
NEW 8'-0" HIGH BLACK
TUBE STEEL FENCE
NEW 8'-0" HIGH BLACK
TUBE STEEL FENCE
0 feet40
1" = 20'
20 60 80
NORTHLIGHT BOLLARDAT ENTRY TYP.
LIGHT BOLLARDAT ENTRY TYP.LINE OF SIGHTLINE OF SIGHTLINE OF SIGHTLINE OF SIGHTR.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.SIDEWALK
FC-1.0
SITE PHOTOMETRIC
ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1
9910 6TH STREET
9910 6th STREET, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA6TH STREET
2201 N. Grand Avenue #10098 | Santa Ana, CA 92711-0098 | (714) 716-5050
www.ELMTConsulting.com
December 23, 2022
N EWCASTLE PARTNERS
Contact: Nathan Lefevre
4740 Green River Road #100
Corona, California 92878
SUBJECT: Biological Due Diligence Memorandum for the Proposed Project located at 9910 6th
Street, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California
Introduction
This report contains the findings of ELMT Consulting’s biological due diligence investigation for the
proposed project located at 9910 6th Street (project site or site) located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Riverside County, California. The biological due diligence investigation was conducted by ELMT
biologists Jacob H. Lloyd Davies and Rachael A. Lyons on October 6, 2022, to document baseline
conditions and to determine the potential for special-status plant and wildlife species to occur on the project
site that could pose a constraint to implementation of the proposed project.
Project Location
The project site is generally located north of Interstate 10, west of Interstate 15, south of State Route 210,
and east of State Route 83 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The site
is depicted on the Guasti quadrangle of the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) 7.5-minute
topographic map within Section 14 of Township 1 South, Range 7 West. Specifically, the project site is
located at 9910 6th Street within Assessor Parcel Numbers 209-211-42 and -43. Refer to Exhibits 1 and 2
in Attachment A.
Methodology
Literature Review
A literature review and records search was conducted for special-status biological resources potentially
occurring on or within the vicinity of the project site. Previously recorded occurrences of special-status
plant and wildlife species and their proximity to the project site were determined through a query of the
California Departments (CDFW’s) QuickView Tool in the Biogeographic Information and Observation
System (BIOS), California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Rarefind 5, and the California Native
Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. The
following resources were also reviewed:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water Program “My Waters” data layers
Google Earth Pro historic aerial imagery (1985-2021);
December 23, 2022
Page 2
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS),
Soil Survey1;
USFWS Critical Habitat designations for Threatened and Endangered Species;
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI);
Habitat Assessment/Field Investigation
Following the literature review, biologists Jacob H. Lloyd Davies inventoried and evaluated the condition
of the habitat within the project site on October 8, 2022. Plant communities and land cover types identified
on aerial photographs during the literature review were verified by walking meandering transects
throughout the project site. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, hydrology,
anthropogenic disturbances, indicator species, condition of on-site plant communities and land cover types,
and presence of potential jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were noted.
Topography and Soils
The project site is ranges in elevation from approximately 1,065 to 1,085 above mean sea level. On-site
topography is generally flat with no areas of significant topographic relief and gently slopes from south to
north. Based on the NRCS USDA Web Soil Survey, the project site is historically underlain by Hanford
sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes). Soils on-site have been mechanically disturbed from historic land uses
and existing development. As a result, no undisturbed/native soils occur on-site.
Existing Site Condition
The project site occurs in an area that primarily supports industrial, commercial, and warehouse
developments. The site is bounded to the north and east by industrial and commercial developments; to the
west by a spur line for the Atchison-Topeka-Santa Fe railroad with commercial and industrial development
beyond; and to the south by 6th Street with industrial development beyond.
The project site itself consists entirely of existing industrial developments and associated infrastructure and
landscaping. Historic and existing land uses have eliminated the natural plant communities that historically
occurred and have alternated the composition of the soils on-site. The project site does not support any plant
communities, but rather a land cover type that would be classified as developed with ornamental
landscaping. Refer to Attachment C, Site Photographs, for representative photographs of the project site.
No native plant communities will be impacted from implementation of the proposed project.
Survey Results
Avian species observed during the field investigation include American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos),
northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), house sparrow (Passer domesticus), and mourning dove
(Zenaida macroura). The only reptilian species observed was Great Basin fence lizard (Sceloporus
occidentalis longipes). No mammalian, fish, or amphibian species were observed during the field
investigation. The project site a provides limited foraging and cover habitat for wildlife species adapted to
1 A soil series is defined as a group of soils with similar profiles developed from similar parent materials under comparable
climatic and vegetation conditions. These profiles include major horizons with similar thickness, arrangement, and other
important characteristics, which may promote favorable conditions for certain biological resources.
December 23, 2022
Page 3
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
a high degree of anthropogenic disturbance.
Nesting Birds
No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field survey, which was
conducted outside of the breeding season. Although the site is developed, on-site structures and ornamental
landscaping have the potential to provide foraging and nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian
residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to disturbed areas
and urban environments. Additionally, the site has potential to support ground-nesting birds such as killdeer
(Charadrius vociferus).
Nesting birds are protected pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and
Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds,
their nests or eggs). If construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction
clearance survey for nesting birds should be conducted prior to the start of any vegetation removal or ground
disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction.
Migratory Corridors and Linkages
The project site has not been identified as occurring in a wildlife corridor or linkage, nor do any mapped
wildlife corridors or linkages occur in proximity to site boundaries. The proposed project will be confined
to existing areas that have been heavily disturbed by historic land uses and existing development and is
bordered by existing development in all directions. As such, implementation of the proposed project will
not disrupt or have any adverse effects on any migratory corridors or linkages in the surrounding area.
Jurisdictional Areas
The project site does not support any discernible drainage courses, inundated areas, wetland vegetation, or
hydric soils that would be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, or CDFW. Therefore,
regulatory approvals from the Corps, Regional Board, and/or CDFW will not be required for
implementation of the project.
Special-Status Biological Resources
The CNDDB Rarefind 5 and the CNPS Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of
California were queried for reported locations of special-status plant and wildlife species as well as special-
status natural plant communities in the Guasti USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle. The field investigation
evaluated the conditions of the habitat(s) within the boundaries of the project site to determine if the existing
plant communities, at the time of the survey, have the potential to provide suitable habitat(s) for special-
status plant and wildlife species.
The literature search identified thirteen (13) special-status plant species and thirty-three (33) special-status
wildlife species as having potential to occur within the Guasti quadrangle. No special-status plant
communities were identified as having potential to occur. Special-status plant and wildlife species were
evaluated for their potential to occur within the project boundaries based on habitat requirements,
availability and quality of suitable habitat, and known distributions. Species determined to have the
potential to occur within the general vicinity are presented in Attachment B, Potentially Occurring Special-
December 23, 2022
Page 4
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
Status Biological Resources.
Special-Status Plants
No special-status plant species were observed during the field investigation. Based on habitat requirements
for specific special-status plant species and the availability and quality of habitats needed by each species,
it was determined that the project site does not have potential to support any of the special-status plant
species known to occur in the vicinity of the site and all are presumed absent.
Special-Status Wildlife
No special-status wildlife species were observed on-site during the habitat assessment. Based on habitat
requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of on-site habitats, it was determined that
the proposed project site has a low potential to support Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), and California
horned lark (Eremophila alpestris actia). It was further determined that the project site does not provide
suitable habitat for any of the other special-status wildlife species known to occur in the area since the
project site has been heavily disturbed from historic and ongoing land uses and development.
Cooper’s hawk is not expected to nest on-site due to the lack of suitable nesting opportunities, although
ornamental trees surrounding the project site may provide such opportunities. Limited nesting opportunities
for California horned lark are present, but routine landscaping activities likely preclude these species from
nesting on-site. With the completion of a pre-construction nesting bird clearance survey, impacts to special-
status avian species will be less than significant and no mitigation will be required.
Critical Habitat
The project site is not located with federally designated Critical Habitat. The nearest federally designated
Critical Habitat occurs approximately 4.2 miles to the northwest for San Bernardino kangaroo rat
(Dipodomys merriami parvus) within the Deer Creek and Day Creek washes. Therefore, the loss or adverse
modification of Critical Habitat will not occur as a result of the proposed project and consultation with the
USFWS will not be required for impacts to Critical Habitat.
Conclusion
The project site has been developed and routinely disturbed by human activity for several decades. Based
on the proposed project footprint and existing site conditions discussed in this report, none of the special-
status plant or wildlife species known to occur in the general vicinity of the project site are expected to be
directly or indirectly impacted from implementation of the project. Therefore, it was determined that
implementation of the project will have “no effect” on federally or State listed species known to occur in
the general vicinity of the project site, or sensitive plant communities. Additionally, the project will not
impact any jurisdictional drainage features, sensitive habitats, designated Critical Habitats, or regional
wildlife movement corridors/linkages.
Please do not hesitate to contact Tom McGill at (951) 285-6014 or tmcgill@elmtconsulting.com or Travis
McGill at (909) 816-1646 or travismcgill@elmtconsulting.com should you have any questions regarding
this proposal.
Sincerely,
December 23, 2022
Page 5
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. Travis J. McGill
Managing Director Director
Attachments:
A.Project Exhibits
B.Potentially Occurring Special-Status Biological Resources
C.Site Photographs
Attachment A
Project Exhibits
Regional Vicinity
9910 6TH STREET
BIOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE
Exhibit 1
O
Source: USA Topographic Map, Riverside County
^_^_
PROJECT
LOCATION
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Legend
Project Site
Project Site
9910 6TH STREET
BIOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE
Exhibit
O
Source: ESRI Aerial Imagery, San Bernardino County
0 125 25062.5
Feet
Legend
Project Site
Vegetation
9910 6TH STREET
BIOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE
Exhibit 3
O
Source: ESRI Aerial Imagery, San Bernardino County
0 125 25062.5
Feet
Legend
Project Site
Developed
Attachment B
Potentially Occurring Special-Status Biological Resources
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
State
Status
CDFW
Listing
CNPS Rare
Plant Rank
Potential
to Occur
Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk None None WL Low
Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird None Threatened SSC Presumed Absent
Aimophila ruficeps canescens southern California rufous crowned sparrow None None WL Presumed Absent
Anniella stebbinsi Southern California legless lizard None None SSC Presumed Absent
Ardea alba great egret None None Presumed Absent
Ardea herodias great blue heron None None Presumed Absent
Arizona elegans occidentalis California glossy snake None None SSC Presumed Absent
Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri coastal whiptail None None SSC Presumed Absent
Athene cunicularia burrowing owl None None SSC Presumed Absent
Bombus crotchii Crotch bumble bee None None Presumed Absent
Calypte costae Costas hummingbird None None Presumed Absent
Chaetodipus fallax fallax northwestern San Diego pocket mouse None None SSC Presumed Absent
Circus hudsonius northern harrier None None SSC Presumed Absent
Dipodomys merriami parvus San Bernardino kangaroo rat Endangered didate Endange SSC Presumed Absent
Dipodomys simulans Dulzura kangaroo rat None None Presumed Absent
Dipodomys stephensi Stephens kangaroo rat Threatened Threatened Presumed Absent
Egretta thula snowy egret None None Presumed Absent
Elanus leucurus white tailed kite None None FP Presumed Absent
Eremophila alpestris actia California horned lark None None WL Low
Eumops perotis californicus western mastiff bat None None SSC Presumed Absent
Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike None None SSC Presumed Absent
Larus californicus California gull None None WL Presumed Absent
Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat None None SSC Presumed Absent
Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California black rail None Threatened FP Presumed Absent
Lepus californicus bennettii San Diego black tailed jackrabbit None None Presumed Absent
Neotoma lepida intermedia San Diego desert woodrat None None SSC Presumed Absent
Nycticorax nycticorax black crowned night heron None None Presumed Absent
Perognathus longimembris brevinasus Los Angeles pocket mouse None None SSC Presumed Absent
Phrynosoma blainvillii coast horned lizard None None SSC Presumed Absent
Polioptila californica californica coastal California gnatcatcher Threatened None SSC Presumed Absent
Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis Delhi Sands flower loving fly Endangered None Presumed Absent
Spizella breweri Brewers sparrow None None Presumed Absent
Vireo bellii pusillus least Bells vireo Endangered Endangered Presumed Absent
Calochortus catalinae Catalina mariposa lily None None 4.2 Presumed Absent
Calochortus plummerae Plummers mariposa lily None None 4.2 Presumed Absent
Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi Parrys spineflower None None 1B.1 Presumed Absent
Cladium californicum California saw grass None None 2B.2 Presumed Absent
Deinandra paniculata paniculate tarplant None None 4.2 Presumed Absent
Horkelia cuneata var. puberula mesa horkelia None None 1B.1 Presumed Absent
Special-Status Plant Species
Special-Status Wildlife Species
Juglans californica southern California black walnut None None 4.2 Presumed Absent
Muhlenbergia californica California muhly None None 4.3 Presumed Absent
Muhlenbergia utilis aparejo grass None None 2B.2 Presumed Absent
Navarretiaprostrata prostrate vernal pool navarretia None None 1B.2 Presumed Absent
Phacelia stellaris Brands star phacelia None None 1B.1 Presumed Absent
Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum white rabbit tobacco None None 2B.2 Presumed Absent
Symphyotrichum defoliatum San Bernardino aster None None 1B.2 Presumed Absent
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Fed) -
Federal
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CA) -
California
END- Federal Endangered
THR- Federal Threatened
END- California Endangered
THR- California Threatened
Candidate- Candidate for listing under the
California Endangered Species Act
FP- California Fully Protected
SSC- Species of Special Concern
WL- Watch List
California Native Plant
Society (CNPS)
California Rare Plant Rank
CNPS Threat Ranks
1B Plants Rare, Threatened, or
Endangered in California and
Elsewhere
2B Plants Rare, Threatened, or
Endangered in California, But
More Common Elsewhere
3 Plants About Which More
0.1- Seriously threatened in California
0.2- Moderately threatened in
California
0.3- Not very threatened in California
Attachment C
Site Photographs
Attachment C – Site Photographs
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
Photograph 1: From the southwest corner of the project site looking north along the western boundary.
Photograph 2: From the southwest corner of the project site looking east along the southern boundary.
Attachment C – Site Photographs
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
Photograph 3: From the southeast corner of the project site looking northwest.
Photograph 4: From the southeast corner of the project site looking north along the eastern boundary.
Attachment C – Site Photographs
9910 6th Street
Biological Due Diligence
Photograph 5: From the access gate near the southern boundary of the project site looking north.
Photograph 6: From the access gate near the southern boundary of the project site looking northwest.
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Rd, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
November 29, 2022
Courtney Smith
Development Manager
4740 Green River Road, #110
Corona, CA 92878
RE: Traffic Memorandum for the Proposed 9910 6th Street Industrial Projectin the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Ms. Smith:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is submitting this Traffic Memorandum to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to provide the trip generation and VMT screening for the proposed 9910 6th
Street Industrial Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed trip generation and
VMT screening for the project is presented below.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located at 9910 6th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project
site is currently occupied by a 8,888-square-foot recycling center. The project will involve the
demolition of the existing use and the construction of two warehouse buildings totaling
74,387 square feet. A copy of the project site plan is provided on Attachment 1.
Vehicular access provisions for the project site would be provided via two full-movement
driveways on 6th Street.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation estimates for the proposed use is based on the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) trip rates for Warehousing (ITE Land
Use 150).
Trip generation rates and the resulting trip generation estimates for the proposed use is
summarized on Attachment 2.
The proposed project is estimated to generate 127 daily trips, with 13 trips in the morning
peak hour, and 14 trips in the evening peak hour. Passenger car equivalent (PCE) factors were
then applied to the truck types, based on the number of axles (1.5 PCE for 2-axle trucks, 2.0
PCE for 3-axle trucks, and 3.0 for 4+ axle trucks) to determine the total PCE volumes
generated by the proposed industrial use.
Ms. Smith, November 29, 2022, Page 2
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Rd, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
After applying PCE factors, the proposed project is estimated to generate 174 daily PCE trips,
with 16 PCE trips in the morning peak hour, and 18 PCE trips in the evening peak hour.
As a conservative approach, the trips from the existing recycling center were not reduced
from the estimated tripsfor the proposed project.
JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (TIA Guidelines; dated
June 2020), a traffic study would be required for a proposed project when the proposed
development is expected to exceed 50 trips during either the AM or PM peak hour.
Based on Attachment 2, the proposed project is not expected to generate 50 or more trips
during either the AM or PM peak hour. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for the
proposed project.
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS
TIA Guidelines provide details on appropriate screening thresholds that can be
used to identify when a proposed land use project is anticipated to result in a less-than-
significant impact without conducting a more detailed level analysis. Screening thresholds
are broken into the following three steps:
1. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
2. Low VMT Area Screening
3. Project Type Screening
Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
A project located within a TPA as determined by the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) VMT Screening Tool would be considered to have a less-than-significant
transportation impact. Based on the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool, the proposed project is not
located within a TPA.
The Transit Priority Area threshold is not met.
Ms. Smith, November 29, 2022, Page 3
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Rd, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Low VMT Area Screening
and the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool would be considered to have a less-than-significant
ning Tool, the
proposed project is not located within a low VMT area (< -15% below County Average).
Results of the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool are provided in Attachment 3.
Low VMT Area Screening is not met.
Project Type Screening
Some project types have been identified as having the presumption of a less-than-significant
impact, including projects generating less than 250 daily vehicle trips. As mentioned
previously, the project is estimated to generate 174 daily trips. As such, the project is
presumed to have a less-than-significant transportation impact.
The Project Type Screening is met.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
TIA guidelines and the project trip generation, a LOS analysis is not
required for the proposed project. Also, the proposed project would screen out of VMT based
on Project Type Screening criteria. As a result, the project would have a less-than-significant
VMT impact, and no further VMT analysis is required for the proposed project.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Trevor Briggs, P.E.
Project Engineer
ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total
150 KSF 1.71 0.13 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.13 0.18
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Quantity Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total
74.387 KSF 127 10 3 13 4 10 14
Passenger Vehicles 73.00%93 7 2 9 3 7 10
Trucks 27.00%34 3 1 4 1 3 4
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Passenger Vehicles 73.00%93 1.0 93 7 2 9 3 7 10
2-Axle Trucks 7.13%9 1.5 14 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 6.17%8 2.0 16 1 0 1 0 1 1
4+ Axle Trucks 13.70%17 3.0 51 4 1 5 2 4 6
81 6 1 7 2 6 8
174 13 3 16 5 13 18
PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent
2 Truck mix percentages were caclucated based on a ratio between the ITE truck splits and the Truck Trip Generatuon Study - City
of Fontana, August 2003
Total Truck PCE Trips
Total Project PCE Trips
KSF = Thousand Square Feet
1 Passenger Vehicle and Truck splits taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th
Edition Supplement
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition
TRIP GENERATION RATES
ATTACHMENT 2
SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 9910 6TH STREET PROJECT
ITE Land Use
Warehousing
PROJECT TRIPS - PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE)
Vehicle Type Vehicle
Mix 1, 2
Daily
Vehicles
PCE
Factor
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Project Land Use
Warehousing
9910 6th Street Warehouse Project
Traffic Memorandum
Kimley- Horn Associates, Inc.
November 2022
14958-01 PMP Letter
December 20, 2022
Courtney Smith
Newcastle Partners
4740 Green River Road, #110
Corona, CA 92878
9910 6TH STREET PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
Courtney Smith,
We are pleased to submit the following Parking Management Plan for the 9910 6th Street
development (referred to as “Project”). The Project is located at 9910 6th Street in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as shown on Exhibit A. This Parking Management Plan (PMP) was prepared
in accordance with City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.070 Parking
Management Plan.
EXHIBIT A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The proposed Project consists of the development of a 25,635 square foot (sf) building and a
48,752 sf building, as shown on Exhibit A. The proposed Project will provide a total of one
hundred and one (101) auto parking spaces, six (6) short term bicycle parking, two (2) long term
bicycle parking, and seven (7) loading/trailer parking spaces. The auto parking spaces are
Courtney Smith
Newcastle Partners
December 20, 2022
Page 2 of 5
14958-01 PMP Letter
configured in a parallel manner. Eleven (11) auto parking spaces are designated for electric
vehicle (EV) use and six (6) auto parking spaces are designated for Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) use.
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
To demonstrate that adequate parking supply exists within the proposed Project, this parking
assessment provides a review of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code parking
requirements and an estimate of the peak parking demands. Section 17.64.050 of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code describes the off-street parking for land uses. Table
17.64.050-1 identifies the parking stalls required for industrial and office land uses such as the
proposed Project.
Table 1 provides a summary of the applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code parking
requirements. For warehouses, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires one (1)
space for each one thousand (1,000) sf for the first twenty thousand (20,000) sf; one (1) space for
each two thousand (2,000) sf for the next twenty thousand (20,000) sf; and one (1) space for each
four thousand (4,000) sf for the remaining sf of building area. For office, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code requires four (4) parking spaces for each one thousand (1,000) sf of
building area.
TABLE 1: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Use Parking Rate Description
Warehouse 1 per 1,000 sf for the first 20,000 sf;
1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf;
and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf
0-20,000 sf: 1 space / 1,000 sf 20,001-
40,000 sf: 1 space / 2,000 sf 40,001+ sf: 1
space / 4,000 sf
Office(s) for
operations and
administration
4 per 1,000 sf 4 spaces / 1,000 sf
Based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050.
Using the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code parking rates, it is possible to calculate the
parking requirements for the proposed Project. As shown on Table 2, the proposed Project
requires 101 stalls.
TABLE 2: 9910 6TH STREET MUNICIPAL CODE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Use Quantity
1
Parking
Rate2
Required
Parking
Proposed
Parking
Meets
Requirement
Building 1 – Office 3,500 sf 4 per 1,000 sf 14
Building 1 – Warehouse 22,135 sf Varies 22
Building 2 – Office 8,500 sf 4 per 1,000 sf 34
Building 2 – Warehouse 40,252 sf Varies 31
Total 74,387 sf -- 101 101 Yes
1 Based on the October 3, 2022 preliminary site plan, prepared by RGA
2 Based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050.
Courtney Smith
Newcastle Partners
December 20, 2022
Page 3 of 5
14958-01 PMP Letter
PARKING GENERATION
The parking generation rates used for this analysis are based upon information collected by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as provided in their Parking Generation Manual (5th
Edition, 2019) (see Table 3). ITE Land Use Code 150 (Warehousing) was chosen for this analysis
since the Project is primarily devoted to the storage of materials, but it may also include office
areas. As shown on Table 3, the proposed Project requires 29 stalls. The application of the ITE
parking generation rates indicate that the Code requirements may overestimate the parking
supply needed for the proposed Project.
TABLE 3: PROJECT PARKING GENERATION SUMMARY
ITE LU
RateLand Use Units
2 Code
Parking Generation Rates:1
Warehousing TSF 150 0.39
1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition (2019).
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
Land Use Quantity Units
1 Spaces
Project Parking Generation Summary:
Warehousing 74.387 TSF 29
1 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
The proposed Projectcan apply additional parking strategies to increase the parking supply. With
a PMP, the availability of parking for guests and employees can be maximized. Exhibit B presents
the proposed PMP recommendations for the Project.
EXHIBIT B: PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
Courtney Smith
Newcastle Partners
December 20, 2022
Page 4 of 5
14958-01 PMP Letter
PARKING STRATEGIES
Changing economic and demographic conditions will continue to influence future parking needs.
Self-driving cars, parking guidance, peer-to-peer vehicle sharing, telecommuting, transportation
network companies such as Uber and Lyft, and other forward-looking technologies will continue
to shape future parking demands. Other parking technologies such as smart vehicle detection
sensors and smart parking management systems are also available and provide opportunities to
actively manage parking resources in real-time.
SHORT-TERM (GUEST) PARKING
The short-term parking spaces are located near high-turnover areas where guests are likely to
drop-by and pickup goods or services (i.e., adjacent to the office space). Since the individual
tenants are not known at this time, these spaces are identified as optional and may be installed
based on input from the future tenants. The short-term parking restrictions are provided to
prevent long-term parking activity and reserve these spaces for the short-term, high frequency
parking activities. Exhibit B identifies the optional short-term parking locations.
The short-term parking allocation recommendations are based on the expected activities at the
Project site. Actual conditions will vary based on the mix of tenants and the hours of operation.
The PMP represents our best estimate of the expected parking demands based on a review of
typical land uses. To optimize the on-site parking utilization, adjustments should be made based
on actual parking demands at the Project site as they develop over time. It is better to add more
short-term spaces as needed since this will limit utilization of these spaces to short-term, high
turnover land use activities. Any parking space restrictions that limits its effective use to one
group or user reduces the availability of these spaces for other groups or users.
LONG-TERM EMPLOYEE PARKING
The PMP recommendations shown on Exhibit B identify a total of 77 employee parking stalls.
Since the individual tenants are not known at this time, these spaces may be installed based on
input from the future tenants. This demand will likely fluctuate throughout the day depending on
the individual uses. The recommendations were designed to limit the number of employee
parking spaces in the high-turnover areas.
This pushes most of the employee parking to areas of the site with the lowest expected parking
demand (i.e., away from the main building entrance). It is important to recognize that these
spaces will not be reserved for the exclusive use of employees. Rather, these spaces are identified
as employee parking to ensure an even distribution of onsite parking and preserve high-turnover
spaces (or preferred spaces) for guests.
MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT
To ensure that the PMP will be managed and implemented, the applicant should actively monitor
and enforce the PMP recommendations. Staff should be on-site to ensure that employees
arriving early park in the assigned areas. To ensure monitoring and enforcement of the PMP,
rules of conduct should be provided to all employees.
Courtney Smith
Newcastle Partners
December 20, 2022
Page 5 of 5
14958-01 PMP Letter
PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATONS
This PMP outlines the onsite parking supply and key parking management strategies to maximize
the utilization of parking for employees and guests. This PMP provides the following
recommendations.
1. Short-term parking could be considered adjacent to the main building entrance/office space.
2. The ADA compliant parking stalls and guest parking stalls should have the appropriate signage.
3. Long-term employee parking should be designated to areas away from the short-term parking.
4. Staff should ensure employees comply with the PMP recommendations and rules of conduct.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Project consists of the development of a 25,635 square foot (sf) building and a
48,752 sf building. The proposed Project meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Municipal Code
parking requirements. The PMP will ensure there is more than adequate parking for employees
and guests.
If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at rvu@urbanxroads.com.
Respectfully submitted,
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
Jose Alire, P.E. Robert Vu, P.E.
Senior Traffic Engineer Transportation Engineer
Noise Measurement Field Data
Project: Job Number:197624001
Site No.: Date:12/7/2022
Analyst: Time:2:36-2:46
Location:
Noise Sources:
Comments:
Results (dBA):
Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Peak:
Measurement 1:52.2 44.8 66.3 88.3
Sound Level Meter:LD SoundExpert LxT Temp. (degrees F):58
Calibrator:CAL200 Wind (mph):6
Response Time:Slow Sky:Partly Cloudy
Weighting:A Bar. Pressure:30.18
Microphone Height:5 feet Humidity:50%
Photo:
Equipment Weather
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park
ST-1
Sarah Miller and Blake Thomas
9859 7th Street parking lot, northwest of project site.
Cars and trucks leaving surrounding warehouses
Summary
File Name on Meter ST-.024.s
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0007061
Model SoundExpert® LxT
Firmware Version 2.404
User
Location
Job Description
Note
Measurement
Description
Start 2022-12-07 14:36:50
Stop 2022-12-07 14:46:50
Duration 00:10:00.0
Run Time 00:10:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre-Calibration None
Post-Calibration None
Calibration Deviation ---
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamplifier Direct
Microphone Correction FF:90 2116
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Normal
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Frequency Weighting A Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum At LMax
Overload 119.8 dB
A C Z
Under Range Peak 76.0 73.0 78.0 dB
Under Range Limit 12.0 10.5 14.8 dB
Noise Floor 2.8 1.3 5.6 dB
First Second Third
Instrument Identification Kimley-Horn and Associates 1100 W. Town&Country Rd, #700 Orange, CA 92868
LxTse_0007061-20221207 143650-ST-.024.ldbin
Results
LAeq 52.2 dB
LAE 80.0 dB
EA 11.064 µPa²h
LApeak (max)2022-12-07 14:41:22 88.3 dB
LASmax 2022-12-07 14:39:07 66.3 dB
LASmin 2022-12-07 14:38:41 44.8 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Exceedance Counts
LAS > 85.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LAS > 115.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 135.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 137.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 140.0 dB 0 0.0 s
Community Noise Ldn LDay 07:00-22:00 LNight 22:00-07:00 Lden LDay 07:00-19:00 LEvening 19:00-22:00
52.2 52.2 -99.9 52.2 52.2 -99.9
LCeq 63.7 dB
LAeq 52.2 dB
LCeq - LAeq 11.5 dB
LAIeq 58.8 dB
LAeq 52.2 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 6.6 dB
dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp
Leq 52.2 63.7
LS(max)66.3 2022/12/07 14:39:07
LS(min)44.8 2022/12/07 14:38:41
LPeak(max)88.3 2022/12/07 14:41:22
Overload Count 0
Overload Duration 0.0 s
OBA Overload Count 0
OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s
Statistics
LA 5.00 56.1 dB
LA 10.00 55.1 dB
LA 33.30 51.9 dB
LA 50.00 50.3 dB
LA 66.60 49.1 dB
LA 90.00 47.8 dB
Calibration History
Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa 6.3 8.0 10.0
PRMLxT1L 2022-12-06 14:22:15 -29.25 49.11 58.65 57.37
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:25 -29.11 73.23 67.85 58.40
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:00 -29.17 64.95 69.71 68.18
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 12:29:27 -27.95 68.98 70.67 68.11
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 11:29:24 -27.15 57.93 50.80 51.29
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 07:03:07 -29.01 83.04 87.27 63.17
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 17:28:00 -28.81 53.32 51.46 50.32
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 15:33:16 -28.88 35.54 47.38 46.05
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 14:03:30 -28.83 65.85 66.01 64.09
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-20 09:11:57 -28.87 52.15 51.35 57.23
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-11 15:28:26 -28.90 59.14 58.36 58.00
Duration
A C Z
Noise Measurement Field Data
Project: Job Number:197624001
Site No.: Date:12/7/2022
Analyst: Time:2:56-3:06
Location:
Noise Sources:
Comments:
Results (dBA):
Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Peak:
Measurement 1:69.5 50.5 79.2 93.9
Sound Level Meter:LD SoundExpert LxT Temp. (degrees F):58
Calibrator:CAL200 Wind (mph):6
Response Time:Slow Sky:Partly Cloudy
Weighting:A Bar. Pressure:30.18
Microphone Height:5 feet Humidity:49%
Photo:
Equipment Weather
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park
ST-2
Sarah Miller and Blake Thomas
North of 9955 6th Street.
Cars and trucks along 6th street
Summary
File Name on Meter ST-.025.s
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0007061
Model SoundExpert® LxT
Firmware Version 2.404
User
Location
Job Description
Note
Measurement
Description
Start 2022-12-07 14:56:45
Stop 2022-12-07 15:06:45
Duration 00:10:00.0
Run Time 00:10:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre-Calibration 2022-12-06 14:22:15
Post-Calibration None
Calibration Deviation ---
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamplifier PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction FF:90 2116
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Normal
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Frequency Weighting A Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum At LMax
Overload 123.0 dB
A C Z
Under Range Peak 79.5 76.5 81.5 dB
Under Range Limit 24.4 25.6 31.8 dB
Noise Floor 15.3 16.4 22.7 dB
First Second Third
Instrument Identification Kimley-Horn and Associates 1100 W. Town&Country Rd, #700 Orange, CA 92868
LxTse_0007061-20221207 145645-ST-.025.ldbin
Results
LAeq 69.5 dB
LAE 97.3 dB
EA 594.167 µPa²h
LApeak (max)2022-12-07 14:56:52 93.9 dB
LASmax 2022-12-07 14:58:23 79.2 dB
LASmin 2022-12-07 15:06:04 50.5 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Exceedance Counts
LAS > 85.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LAS > 115.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 135.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 137.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 140.0 dB 0 0.0 s
Community Noise Ldn LDay 07:00-22:00 LNight 22:00-07:00 Lden LDay 07:00-19:00 LEvening 19:00-22:00
69.5 69.5 -99.9 69.5 69.5 -99.9
LCeq 75.3 dB
LAeq 69.5 dB
LCeq - LAeq 5.8 dB
LAIeq 70.7 dB
LAeq 69.5 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 1.2 dB
dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp
Leq 69.5 75.3
LS(max)79.2 2022/12/07 14:58:23
LS(min)50.5 2022/12/07 15:06:04
LPeak(max)93.9 2022/12/07 14:56:52
Overload Count 0
Overload Duration 0.0 s
OBA Overload Count 0
OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s
Statistics
LA 5.00 74.3 dB
LA 10.00 73.5 dB
LA 33.30 70.3 dB
LA 50.00 67.9 dB
LA 66.60 64.4 dB
LA 90.00 55.8 dB
Calibration History
Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa 6.3 8.0 10.0
PRMLxT1L 2022-12-06 14:22:15 -29.25 49.11 58.65 57.37
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:25 -29.11 73.23 67.85 58.40
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:00 -29.17 64.95 69.71 68.18
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 12:29:27 -27.95 68.98 70.67 68.11
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 11:29:24 -27.15 57.93 50.80 51.29
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 07:03:07 -29.01 83.04 87.27 63.17
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 17:28:00 -28.81 53.32 51.46 50.32
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 15:33:16 -28.88 35.54 47.38 46.05
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 14:03:30 -28.83 65.85 66.01 64.09
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-20 09:11:57 -28.87 52.15 51.35 57.23
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-11 15:28:26 -28.90 59.14 58.36 58.00
Duration
A C Z
Noise Measurement Field Data
Project: Job Number:197624001
Site No.: Date:12/7/2022
Analyst: Time:3:10-3:20
Location:
Noise Sources:
Comments:
Results (dBA):
Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Peak:
Measurement 1: 68.2 48.2 77 102.8
Sound Level Meter:LD SoundExpert LxT Temp. (degrees F):58
Calibrator:CAL200 Wind (mph):6
Response Time:Slow Sky:Partly Cloudy
Weighting:A Bar. Pressure:30.19
Microphone Height:5 feet Humidity:50%
Photo:
Equipment Weather
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park
ST-3
Sarah Miller and Blake Thomas
South of 9850 6th Street.
Cars driving over train tracks
Summary
File Name on Meter ST-.026.s
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0007061
Model SoundExpert® LxT
Firmware Version 2.404
User
Location
Job Description
Note
Measurement
Description
Start 2022-12-07 15:10:21
Stop 2022-12-07 15:20:21
Duration 00:10:00.0
Run Time 00:10:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre-Calibration None
Post-Calibration None
Calibration Deviation ---
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamplifier Direct
Microphone Correction FF:90 2116
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Normal
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Frequency Weighting A Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum At LMax
Overload 119.8 dB
A C Z
Under Range Peak 76.0 73.0 78.0 dB
Under Range Limit 12.0 10.5 14.8 dB
Noise Floor 2.8 1.3 5.6 dB
First Second Third
Instrument Identification Kimley-Horn and Associates 1100 W. Town&Country Rd, #700 Orange, CA 92868
LxTse_0007061-20221207 151021-ST-.026.ldbin
Results
LAeq 68.2 dB
LAE 96.0 dB
EA 440.462 µPa²h
LApeak (max)2022-12-07 15:13:26 102.8 dB
LASmax 2022-12-07 15:15:13 77.0 dB
LASmin 2022-12-07 15:16:08 48.2 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Exceedance Counts
LAS > 85.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LAS > 115.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 135.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 137.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 140.0 dB 0 0.0 s
Community Noise Ldn LDay 07:00-22:00 LNight 22:00-07:00 Lden LDay 07:00-19:00 LEvening 19:00-22:00
68.2 68.2 -99.9 68.2 68.2 -99.9
LCeq 74.5 dB
LAeq 68.2 dB
LCeq - LAeq 6.3 dB
LAIeq 72.7 dB
LAeq 68.2 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 4.5 dB
dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp
Leq 68.2 74.5
LS(max)77.0 2022/12/07 15:15:13
LS(min)48.2 2022/12/07 15:16:08
LPeak(max)102.8 2022/12/07 15:13:26
Overload Count 0
Overload Duration 0.0 s
OBA Overload Count 0
OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s
Statistics
LA 5.00 73.6 dB
LA 10.00 72.4 dB
LA 33.30 68.4 dB
LA 50.00 66.2 dB
LA 66.60 63.0 dB
LA 90.00 54.4 dB
Calibration History
Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa 6.3 8.0 10.0
PRMLxT1L 2022-12-06 14:22:15 -29.25 49.11 58.65 57.37
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:25 -29.11 73.23 67.85 58.40
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-15 08:15:00 -29.17 64.95 69.71 68.18
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 12:29:27 -27.95 68.98 70.67 68.11
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 11:29:24 -27.15 57.93 50.80 51.29
PRMLxT1L 2022-11-10 07:03:07 -29.01 83.04 87.27 63.17
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 17:28:00 -28.81 53.32 51.46 50.32
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 15:33:16 -28.88 35.54 47.38 46.05
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-25 14:03:30 -28.83 65.85 66.01 64.09
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-20 09:11:57 -28.87 52.15 51.35 57.23
PRMLxT1L 2022-10-11 15:28:26 -28.90 59.14 58.36 58.00
Duration
A C Z
Project: Rancho Cucamonga Business Park
Construction Noise Impact on Sensitive Receptors
Parameters
Construction Hours:Daytime hours (7 am to 7 pm) 8
Evening hours (7 pm to 10 pm) 0
Nighttime hours (10 pm to 7 am) 0
Leq to L10 factor 3
Receptor (Land Use)
Distance
(feet)Shielding* Direction
1 Single-Family Residential 1,510 10 W
2 Industrial 140 10 E
3 Industrial 205 10 W
4 Industrial 317 10 N
5 Industrial 427 10 S
6 - - 0 -
7 - - 0 -
RECEPTOR 1 RECEPTOR 2 RECEPTOR 3 RECEPTOR 4 RECEPTOR 5
Construction Phase Equipment Type
No. of
Equip.
Acoustica
l Usage
Factor
Reference
Noise Level
at 50ft per
Unit, Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 1,
Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 1,
Leq
Noise
Level at
Receptor 2,
Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 2,
Leq
Noise
Level at
Receptor 3,
Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 3,
Leq
Noise
Level at
Receptor 4,
Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 4,
Leq
Noise
Level at
Receptor 5,
Lmax
Noise
Level at
Receptor 5,
Leq
Demolition
Concrete Saw 1 20% 90 50.0 43.0 70.7 63.7 67.3 60.4 63.6 56.6 61.0 54.0
Excavator 1 40% 81 41.1 37.1 61.8 57.8 58.4 54.5 54.7 50.7 52.1 48.1
Dozer 1 40% 82 42.1 38.1 62.8 58.8 59.4 55.5 55.7 51.7 53.1 49.1
Combined LEQ 45.0 65.7 62.3 58.6 56.0
Site Preparation
Dozer 1 40% 82 42.1 38.1 62.8 58.8 59.4 55.5 55.7 51.7 53.1 49.1
Tractor 1 40% 84 44.4 40.4 65.1 61.1 61.7 57.8 58.0 54.0 55.4 51.4
Combined LEQ 42.4 63.1 59.8 56.0 53.4
Grading
Excavator 1 40% 81 41.1 37.1 61.8 57.8 58.4 54.5 54.7 50.7 52.1 48.1
Grader 1 40% 85 45.4 41.4 66.1 62.1 62.7 58.8 59.0 55.0 56.4 52.4
Dozer 1 40% 82 42.1 38.1 62.8 58.8 59.4 55.5 55.7 51.7 53.1 49.1
Tractor 1 40% 84 44.4 40.4 65.1 61.1 61.7 57.8 58.0 54.0 55.4 51.4
Combined LEQ 45.6 66.3 63.0 59.2 56.6
Building Construction
Crane 1 16% 81 41.0 33.0 61.7 53.7 58.3 50.4 54.6 46.6 52.0 44.0
Forklift 1 40% 74 34.7 30.7 55.4 51.4 52.0 48.1 48.3 44.3 45.7 41.7
Generator 1 50% 81 41.0 38.0 61.7 58.6 58.3 55.3 54.6 51.5 52.0 49.0
Tractor 1 40% 84 44.4 40.4 65.1 61.1 61.7 57.8 58.0 54.0 55.4 51.4
Welder/Torch 1 40% 74 34.4 30.4 55.1 51.1 51.7 47.8 48.0 44.0 45.4 41.4
Combined LEQ 43.3 64.0 60.7 56.9 54.3
Paving
Paver 1 50% 77 37.6 34.6 58.3 55.2 54.9 51.9 51.2 48.1 48.6 45.6
Roller 1 20% 80 40.4 33.4 61.1 54.1 57.7 50.8 54.0 47.0 51.4 44.4
Tractor 1 40% 84 44.4 40.4 65.1 61.1 61.7 57.8 58.0 54.0 55.4 51.4
Combined LEQ 42.1 62.7 59.4 55.6 53.0
Architectural Coating
Compressor (air) 1 40% 78 38.1 34.1 58.8 54.8 55.4 51.5 51.7 47.7 49.1 45.1
Combined LEQ 34.1 54.8 51.5 47.7 45.1
Combined Grading/Paving/Building
Construction
Excavator 1 40% 81 41.1 37.1 61.8 57.8 58.4 54.5 54.7 50.7 52.1 48.1
Grader 1 40% 85 45.4 41.4 66.1 62.1 62.7 58.8 59.0 55.0 56.4 52.4
Dozer 1 40% 82 42.1 38.1 62.8 58.8 59.4 55.5 55.7 51.7 53.1 49.1
Tractor 1 40% 84 44.4 40.4 65.1 61.1 61.7 57.8 58.0 54.0 55.4 51.4
Crane 1 16% 81 41.0 33.0 61.7 53.7 58.3 50.4 54.6 46.6 52.0 44.0
Forklift 1 40% 74 34.7 30.7 55.4 51.4 52.0 48.1 48.3 44.3 45.7 41.7
Generator 1 50% 81 41.0 38.0 61.7 58.6 58.3 55.3 54.6 51.5 52.0 49.0
Welder/Torch 1 40% 74 34.4 30.4 55.1 51.1 51.7 47.8 48.0 44.0 45.4 41.4
Roller 1 20% 80 40.4 33.4 61.1 54.1 57.7 50.8 54.0 47.0 51.4 44.4
Combined LEQ 46.9 67.6 64.3 60.5 57.9
Source for Ref. Noise Levels: RCNM, 2005
*Noise calculations include a 10 dBA noise reduction from the use of
mufflers in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 27150(a).
Receptor Phase Direction
Distance to
Center of
Site
Ambient
(dBA Leq)
Project
Construction
Noise Level dBA
Leq Threshold
Exceeds
Threshold?over threshold
1 Single-Family Residential Demolition W 1510 68.2 45.0 65.0 No --
Site Preparation 42.4 No --
Grading 45.6 No --
Building Construction 43.3 No --
Paving 42.1 No --
Architectural Coating 34.1 No --
Combined Grading/Paving/Building Construction 46.9 No --
2 Industrial Demolition E 140 69.5 65.7 70.0 No --
Site Preparation 63.1 No --
Grading 66.3 No --
Building Construction 64.0 No --
Paving 62.7 No --
Architectural Coating 54.8 No --
Combined Grading/Paving/Building Construction 67.6 No --
3 Industrial Demolition W 205 68.2 62.3 70.0 No --
Site Preparation 59.8 No --
Grading 63.0 No --
Building Construction 60.7 No --
Paving 59.4 No --
Architectural Coating 51.5 No --
Combined Grading/Paving/Building Construction 64.3 No --
4 Industrial Demolition N 317 52.2 58.6 70.0 No --
Site Preparation 56.0 No --
Grading 59.2 No --
Building Construction 56.9 No --
Paving 55.6 No --
Architectural Coating 47.7 No --
Combined Grading/Paving/Building Construction 60.5 No --
5 Industrial Demolition S 427 100 56.0 70.0 No --
Site Preparation 53.4 No --
Grading 56.6 No --
Building Construction 54.3 No --
Paving 53.0 No --
Architectural Coating 45.1 No --
Combined Grading/Paving/Building Construction 57.9 No --
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
1 / 45
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom
Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
2 / 45
3.7. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
3.9. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
3.11. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
3.13. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
3.15. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
3 / 45
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
4 / 45
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
5 / 45
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
6 / 45
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
8. User Changes to Default Data
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
7 / 45
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 9910 6th St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Rancho Cucamonga
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5280
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
74.4 1000sqft 2.27 74,387 24,323 0.00 — —
Parking Lot 101 Space 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
8 / 45
——0.000.000.001.37Acre1.37Other Asphalt
Surfaces
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.80 19.0 39.8 37.1 0.05 1.81 7.89 9.70 1.66 3.99 5.65 — 6,404 6,404 0.27 0.12 4.38 6,451
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.24 3.55 32.6 36.3 0.05 1.50 3.47 4.97 1.38 1.51 2.89 — 6,364 6,364 0.28 0.12 0.10 6,408
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.23 3.01 9.10 11.0 0.02 0.40 0.91 1.31 0.37 0.38 0.75 — 2,013 2,013 0.09 0.04 0.58 2,028
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.22 0.55 1.66 2.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.17 0.24 0.07 0.07 0.14 — 333 333 0.01 0.01 0.10 336
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
9 / 45
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 4.80 4.04 39.8 37.1 0.05 1.81 7.89 9.70 1.66 3.99 5.65 — 5,552 5,552 0.23 0.12 2.04 5,575
2024 4.00 19.0 30.1 36.1 0.05 1.34 3.47 4.81 1.23 1.51 2.74 — 6,404 6,404 0.27 0.12 4.38 6,451
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 4.24 3.55 32.6 36.3 0.05 1.50 3.47 4.97 1.38 1.51 2.89 — 6,364 6,364 0.28 0.12 0.10 6,408
2024 3.99 3.34 30.2 35.1 0.05 1.34 3.47 4.81 1.23 1.51 2.74 — 6,349 6,349 0.28 0.12 0.10 6,393
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.94 0.79 7.36 7.81 0.01 0.34 0.79 1.12 0.31 0.35 0.66 — 1,325 1,325 0.06 0.03 0.32 1,334
2024 1.23 3.01 9.10 11.0 0.02 0.40 0.91 1.31 0.37 0.38 0.75 — 2,013 2,013 0.09 0.04 0.58 2,028
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.17 0.14 1.34 1.42 < 0.005 0.06 0.14 0.21 0.06 0.06 0.12 — 219 219 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 221
2024 0.22 0.55 1.66 2.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.17 0.24 0.07 0.07 0.14 — 333 333 0.01 0.01 0.10 336
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.03 2.72 0.67 7.96 0.01 0.04 0.34 0.37 0.04 0.06 0.10 70.6 2,096 2,167 7.26 0.11 3.96 2,385
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.43 2.17 0.67 3.92 0.01 0.03 0.34 0.37 0.03 0.06 0.09 70.6 2,011 2,082 7.27 0.11 0.10 2,297
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
10 / 45
——————————————————Average
Daily
(Max)
Unmit. 0.82 2.53 0.69 6.28 0.01 0.04 0.34 0.37 0.04 0.06 0.10 70.6 2,031 2,102 7.27 0.11 1.71 2,319
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.15 0.46 0.13 1.15 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 11.7 336 348 1.20 0.02 0.28 384
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.41 0.37 0.26 4.40 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 905 905 0.03 0.02 3.96 917
Area 0.57 2.33 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 1.03 2.72 0.67 7.96 0.01 0.04 0.34 0.37 0.04 0.06 0.10 70.6 2,096 2,167 7.26 0.11 3.96 2,385
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.39 0.35 0.29 3.60 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 833 833 0.03 0.03 0.10 842
Area — 1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 0.43 2.17 0.67 3.92 0.01 0.03 0.34 0.37 0.03 0.06 0.09 70.6 2,011 2,082 7.27 0.11 0.10 2,297
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
11 / 45
——————————————————Average
Daily
Mobile 0.39 0.35 0.30 3.75 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 844 844 0.03 0.03 1.71 854
Area 0.39 2.16 0.02 2.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.11 9.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.15
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 0.82 2.53 0.69 6.28 0.01 0.04 0.34 0.37 0.04 0.06 0.10 70.6 2,031 2,102 7.27 0.11 1.71 2,319
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 140 140 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 141
Area 0.07 0.39 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 — 167
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 6.24 0.00 6.24 0.62 0.00 — 21.8
Total 0.15 0.46 0.13 1.15 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 11.7 336 348 1.20 0.02 0.28 384
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
3.39 2.84 27.3 23.5 0.03 1.20 — 1.20 1.10 — 1.10 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.41 0.41 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
12 / 45
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.13 0.11 1.05 0.90 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 131 131 0.01 < 0.005 — 132
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.02 0.02 0.19 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 21.8 21.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.8
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 220 220 0.01 0.01 0.94 224
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.07 0.01 0.66 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 526 526 0.06 0.08 1.09 553
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 7.85 7.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 7.96
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
13 / 45
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.2
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1.30 1.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.32
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.34 3.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.51
3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
4.70 3.95 39.7 35.5 0.05 1.81 — 1.81 1.66 — 1.66 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 7.67 7.67 — 3.94 3.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.09 0.08 0.76 0.68 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 102
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
14 / 45
———————0.080.08—0.150.15——————Dust
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.02 0.01 0.14 0.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 16.8 16.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.09 1.62 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 257 257 0.01 0.01 1.10 261
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.58 4.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.65
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.77
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
15 / 45
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
2.43 2.04 20.0 19.7 0.03 0.94 — 0.94 0.87 — 0.87 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,968
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.44 0.37 3.60 3.54 < 0.005 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 533 533 0.02 < 0.005 — 534
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.50 0.50 — 0.24 0.24 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.08 0.07 0.66 0.65 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 88.2 88.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 88.5
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
16 / 45
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.09 0.09 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 202 202 0.01 0.01 0.02 204
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 36.9 36.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 37.4
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6.10 6.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.19
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
17 / 45
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
2.26 1.90 18.2 18.8 0.03 0.84 — 0.84 0.77 — 0.77 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,969
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
2.26 1.90 18.2 18.8 0.03 0.84 — 0.84 0.77 — 0.77 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,969
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.53 0.45 4.32 4.46 0.01 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.65 0.65 — 0.32 0.32 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.10 0.08 0.79 0.81 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
18 / 45
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 216 216 0.01 0.01 0.86 219
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 198 198 0.01 0.01 0.02 200
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 47.5 47.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 48.2
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 7.87 7.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.98
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
19 / 45
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
1.50 1.26 11.8 13.2 0.02 0.55 — 0.55 0.51 — 0.51 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.19 1.80 2.01 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 366 366 0.01 < 0.005 — 367
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.04 0.04 0.33 0.37 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 60.6 60.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 60.8
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.18 0.16 0.19 2.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 421 421 0.02 0.02 0.05 426
Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.48 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 387 387 0.03 0.06 0.03 404
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
20 / 45
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 65.1 65.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 66.0
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 59.0 59.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 61.8
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 10.8 10.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.9
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.77 9.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.2
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
21 / 45
Off-Road
Equipment
0.51 0.43 4.02 4.70 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.16 — 0.16 — 859 859 0.03 0.01 — 862
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.09 0.08 0.73 0.86 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 142 142 0.01 < 0.005 — 143
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.18 0.16 0.15 2.64 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 450 450 0.02 0.02 1.80 457
Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.44 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 382 382 0.03 0.06 1.07 401
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.15 0.18 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 412 412 0.02 0.02 0.05 417
Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.46 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 382 382 0.03 0.06 0.03 400
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 150 150 0.01 0.01 0.28 152
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.16 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 137 137 0.01 0.02 0.16 143
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 25.1
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.7 22.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.7
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
22 / 45
3.13. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.91 0.76 6.87 8.89 0.01 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,351 1,351 0.05 0.01 — 1,355
Paving — 0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.05 0.04 0.40 0.51 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78.0
Paving — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.9
Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
23 / 45
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.10 1.69 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 288 288 0.01 0.01 1.15 292
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 15.4 15.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 15.6
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 2.55 2.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.59
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.15. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 16.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
24 / 45
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.2
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.66 2.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.67
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 90.0 90.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.36 91.3
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.2
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
25 / 45
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1.67 1.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.69
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.41 0.37 0.26 4.40 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 905 905 0.03 0.02 3.96 917
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.41 0.37 0.26 4.40 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 905 905 0.03 0.02 3.96 917
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
26 / 45
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail
0.39 0.35 0.29 3.60 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 833 833 0.03 0.03 0.10 842
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.39 0.35 0.29 3.60 0.01 < 0.005 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 833 833 0.03 0.03 0.10 842
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.07 0.06 0.05 0.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 140 140 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 141
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 140 140 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 141
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
27 / 45
503—< 0.0050.03501501————————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 551 551 0.03 < 0.005 — 553
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 501 501 0.03 < 0.005 — 503
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 551 551 0.03 < 0.005 — 553
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 82.9 82.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 83.2
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 8.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.40
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 91.3 91.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 91.6
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
28 / 45
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
29 / 45
75.2—< 0.0050.0175.075.0—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.060.07< 0.0050.01Unrefrige
rated
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 75.0 75.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 75.2
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.57 0.53 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Total 0.57 2.33 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
30 / 45
Architect
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
Total 0.07 0.39 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
31 / 45
0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
32 / 45
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
33 / 45
21.8—0.000.626.240.006.24———————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.24 0.00 6.24 0.62 0.00 — 21.8
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
34 / 45
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
35 / 45
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
36 / 45
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
37 / 45
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
38 / 45
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description
Demolition Demolition 9/1/2023 9/20/2023 5.00 14.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/21/2023 9/30/2023 5.00 7.00 —
Grading Grading 10/1/2023 4/30/2024 5.00 152 Includes infrastructure
improvements.
Building Construction Building Construction 10/15/2023 7/1/2024 5.00 186 —
Paving Paving 6/1/2024 7/1/2024 5.00 21.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/1/2024 7/1/2024 5.00 44.0 —
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
39 / 45
0.3784.07.003.00AverageDieselBuilding Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 89.0 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix
Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 7.36 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
40 / 45
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 31.2 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 12.2 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 6.25 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
41 / 45
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 111,581 37,194 5,956
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Ton of
Debris)
Material Exported (Ton of
Debris)
Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Building
Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,900 —
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 10.5 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 0.00 152 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.28
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day)PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.91 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.37 100%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
42 / 45
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
93.0 93.0 93.0 33,939 1,241 1,241 1,241 453,112
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 111,581 37,194 5,956
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
43 / 45
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
343,571 532 0.0330 0.0040 1,414,147
Parking Lot 34,686 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 17,201,994 390,606
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 69.9 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
44 / 45
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Construction + Passenger Cars Custom Report, 1/3/2023
45 / 45
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Warehouse lot acreage includes landscaped area.
Construction: Construction Phases Per construction questionnaire.
Operations: Vehicle Data Per trip gen. Passenger cars only.
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger car fleet mix.
Operations: Refrigerants The project does not include cold storage.
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
1 / 24
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
2 / 24
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
3 / 24
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
4 / 24
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
8. User Changes to Default Data
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
5 / 24
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 9910 6th St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Rancho Cucamonga
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5280
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
74.4 1000sqft 2.27 74,387 24,323 0.00 — —
Parking Lot 101 Space 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
6 / 24
——0.000.000.001.37Acre1.37Other Asphalt
Surfaces
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.94 2.44 3.74 5.27 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.08 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,254 4,325 7.45 0.54 10.1 4,682
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.36 1.91 3.86 2.04 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.07 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,242 4,312 7.45 0.54 0.26 4,659
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.76 2.27 3.92 4.25 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.08 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,250 4,321 7.45 0.54 4.34 4,672
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.14 0.41 0.72 0.78 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.04 11.7 704 715 1.23 0.09 0.72 774
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
7 / 24
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.32 0.09 3.33 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 10.1 3,213
Area 0.57 2.33 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 0.94 2.44 3.74 5.27 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.08 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,254 4,325 7.45 0.54 10.1 4,682
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.32 0.09 3.48 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 0.26 3,204
Area — 1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 0.36 1.91 3.86 2.04 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.07 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,242 4,312 7.45 0.54 0.26 4,659
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.32 0.09 3.52 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 4.34 3,208
Area 0.39 2.16 0.02 2.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.11 9.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.15
Energy 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,005 1,005 0.07 < 0.005 — 1,008
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Total 0.76 2.27 3.92 4.25 0.03 0.08 0.51 0.59 0.08 0.12 0.20 70.6 4,250 4,321 7.45 0.54 4.34 4,672
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.06 0.02 0.64 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 507 507 0.04 0.07 0.72 531
Area 0.07 0.39 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
8 / 24
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 — 167
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 6.24 0.00 6.24 0.62 0.00 — 21.8
Total 0.14 0.41 0.72 0.78 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.04 11.7 704 715 1.23 0.09 0.72 774
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.32 0.09 3.33 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 10.1 3,213
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.32 0.09 3.33 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 10.1 3,213
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
9 / 24
3,2040.260.450.223,0633,063—0.170.120.050.560.510.050.031.723.480.090.32Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.32 0.09 3.48 1.72 0.03 0.05 0.51 0.56 0.05 0.12 0.17 — 3,063 3,063 0.22 0.45 0.26 3,204
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.06 0.02 0.64 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 507 507 0.04 0.07 0.72 531
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.06 0.02 0.64 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 507 507 0.04 0.07 0.72 531
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
10 / 24
503—< 0.0050.03501501————————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
Rail
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 551 551 0.03 < 0.005 — 553
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 501 501 0.03 < 0.005 — 503
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 551 551 0.03 < 0.005 — 553
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 82.9 82.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 83.2
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8.37 8.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.40
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 91.3 91.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 91.6
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
11 / 24
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 453 453 0.04 < 0.005 — 454
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
12 / 24
75.2—< 0.0050.0175.075.0—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.060.07< 0.0050.01Unrefrige
rated
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 75.0 75.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 75.2
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.57 0.53 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Total 0.57 2.33 0.03 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
13 / 24
Architect
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
Total 0.07 0.39 < 0.005 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.51
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
14 / 24
0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 33.0 174 207 3.39 0.08 — 316
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 5.46 28.8 34.2 0.56 0.01 — 52.3
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
15 / 24
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 37.7 0.00 37.7 3.77 0.00 — 132
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
16 / 24
21.8—0.000.626.240.006.24———————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.24 0.00 6.24 0.62 0.00 — 21.8
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
17 / 24
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
18 / 24
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
19 / 24
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
20 / 24
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
21 / 24
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
34.0 34.0 34.0 12,410 1,129 1,129 1,129 412,013
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 111,581 37,194 5,956
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
22 / 24
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
343,571 532 0.0330 0.0040 1,414,147
Parking Lot 34,686 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 17,201,994 390,606
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 69.9 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
23 / 24
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park_Trucks Only Custom Report, 1/3/2023
24 / 24
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Warehouse lot acreage includes landscaped area.
Construction: Construction Phases Per construction questionnaire.
Operations: Vehicle Data Per trip gen. Trucks only.
Operations: Fleet Mix Truck fleet mix.
Operations: Refrigerants The project does not include cold storage.
Emergency Backup Generator Emissions
Fuel Type Quantity HP LF
Hours/Year
per Unit
Hours per
Day
HP-hr per
day
Total hp-hr
per year
Standard Generator Diesel 2 750 0.74 50 1 1,500 75,000
Emissions Rates (g/hp-hr)
HC ROG TOG CO NOX CO2 PM10 PM2.5 PM SOX CH4
Standard Warehouse 0.14 1.0205827 1.1249089 2.6 2.85 521.63114 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00494 0.073
From CalEEMod Guide Appenix D, Table 12.1 and updated with Tier 4 Standards (CARB 2017 Off-Road Diesel Emission Factor Update for NOx and PM)
Emissions (pounds/day)
HC ROG TOG CO NOX CO2 PM10 PM2.5 PM SOX CH4
Standard Warehouse 0.46 3.38 3.72 8.60 9.42 1725.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.02 0.00
Total 0.46 3.38 3.72 8.60 9.42 1725.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.02 0.00
Emissions (tons/year)
HC ROG TOG CO NOX CO2 PM10 PM2.5 PM SOX CH4
Standard Warehouse 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.21 0.24 43.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
Total 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.21 0.24 43.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
GHG Emissions (metric tons) CO2 CH4 CO2e
Project 39.12 0.00 39.12
Model Output: OFFROAD2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC), Riverside (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Scenario: All Adopted Rules - Exhaust
Vehicle Classification: OFFROAD2021 Equipment Types
Units: tons/day for Emissions, gallons/year for Fuel, hours/year for Activity, Horsepower-hours/year for Horsepower-hours
Region Calendar YearVehicle Category Model Year Horsepower BinFuel HC_tpd ROG_tpd TOG_tpd CO_tpd NOx_tpd CO2_tpd PM10_tpd PM2.5_tpd SOx_tpd NH3_tpd Fuel Consumption Total_Activity_hpyTotal_PopulationHorsepower_Hours_hhpy
San Bernardino (SC)2024 Airport Ground Support - Cargo Tractor Aggregate 175 Diesel 2.74035E-05 3.31582E-05 3.94611E-05 0.000414 0.00028 0.067926 1.63064E-05 1.50019E-05 6.27186E-07 5.54402E-07 2203.778901 819.0888 1.207212 117815.8305
San Bernardino (SC)2024 Airport Ground Support - Cargo Tractor Aggregate 300 Diesel 2.83534E-05 3.43076E-05 4.08289E-05 0.000214 0.000324 0.099226 1.08417E-05 9.97434E-06 9.16547E-07 8.09873E-07 3219.292469 792.8633 1.207212 172104.402
g/hph
HC ROG TOG CO Nox CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2024 0.077019097 0.093193108 0.1109075 1.1636382 0.7870103 190.90937 0.045830084 0.042163677 0.001762741 0.001558177 6193844.215
0.054551745 0.066007611 0.078554512 0.4111519 0.6240925 190.91116 0.020859334 0.019190587 0.001763432 0.001558191 6193902.447
0.131570842 0.159200719 0.189462012 1.5747902 1.4111029 381.82053 0.066689418 0.061354264 0.003526173 0.003116368 12387746.66
0.05449369 0.065937365 0.078470914 0.6522427 0.5844471 158.1415 0.02762126 0.025411559 0.001460462 0.00129073 5130726.664
Project Yard Trucks 2
HP 190
Hours per Day 12
Days per Year 365
1 pound = 453.5924 grams
Emissions Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 MT/yr PM10 tons/yr
Project Yard Trucks 0.66 5.88 6.56 0.01 0.28 0.26 1589.81 263.21 0.051
0.00 0.00 0.000
Based on aggregated emission rates obtained from CARB OFFROAD Version 1.0.1.
Number of yard trucks/hostlers per SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results, June 2014.
Model Output: OFFROAD2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC), Riverside (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Scenario: All Adopted Rules - Exhaust
Vehicle Classification: OFFROAD2021 Equipment Types
Units: tons/day for Emissions, gallons/year for Fuel, hours/year for Activity, Horsepower-hours/year for Horsepower-hours
Region Calendar YearVehicle Category Model Year Horsepower BinFuel HC_tpd ROG_tpd TOG_tpd CO_tpd NOx_tpd CO2_tpd PM10_tpd PM2.5_tpd SOx_tpd NH3_tpd Fuel Consumption Total_Activity_hpyTotal_Population Horsepower_Hours_hhpy
San Bernardino (SC)2024 Industrial - Forklifts Aggregate 100 Diesel 0.003692 0.004467 0.005316 0.055354 0.042127 8.071157 0.002409 0.002216 7.45111E-05 6.58757E-05 261859.8017 306065.9 392.7312337 25228131.43
g/hph
HC ROG TOG CO Nox CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2024 0.0484571 0.0586331 0.0697782 0.7265422 0.5529269 105.93674 0.0316215 0.0290918 0.000977984 0.000864641 3437000.979
Project Forklifts 2
HP 89
Hours per Day 12
Days per Year 365
1 pound = 453.5924 grams
Emissions Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 MT/yr PM10 tons/yr
Project Forklifts 0.28 2.60 3.42 0.00 0.15 0.14 499 82.59 0.027
Based on aggregated emission rates obtained from CARB OFFROAD Version 1.0.1.
Number of forklifts per SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results, June 2014.
Water Quality Management Plan
For:
6th Street Industrial
CITY CASE NO. TBD
WQMP NO. TBD
GRADING PERMIT NO. TBD
BUILDING PERMIT NO. TBD
APN 0229-131-24
Prepared for:
Newcastle Partners
4740 Green River Road, Suite 110
Corona, CA 92880
(951) 582-9800
Prepared by:
SDH & Associates, Inc.
27363 Via Industria
Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 683-3691
Submittal Date: August 8, 2022
Revision Date: N/A
Approval Date:_____________________
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for Newcastle Partners by SDH &
Associates, Inc. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and the NPDES Areawide Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of a WQMP. The undersigned,
while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and
will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent
Permit for San Bernardino County and the incorporated cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa
Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors in interest and the
city/county shall be notified of the transfer. The new owner will be informed of its responsibility under this
WQMP. A copy of the approved WQMP shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity.
certify under a penalty of law that the provisions (implementation, operation, maintenance, and funding)
of the WQMP have been accepted and that the plan will be tra
Project Data
Permit/Application
Number(s): TBD Grading Permit Number(s): TBD
Tract/Parcel Map
Number(s): TBD Building Permit Number(s): TBD
CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract): APN 0209-211-42, 0209-211-43
s Signature
Owner Name: Dennis Higgs
Title Founder and Managing Partner
Company Newcastle Partners
Address 4740 Green River Road, Suite 110, Corona, CA 92880
Email ddh@newcastlepartners.com
Telephone # (951) 582-9800
Signature Date
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Contents
Preparer
Project Data
Permit/Application
Number(s): TBD Grading Permit Number(s): TBD
Tract/Parcel Map
Number(s): TBD Building Permit Number(s): TBD
CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract): APN 0209-211-42, 0209-211-
43
measures in this plan were prepared under my oversight and meet the requirements of Regional Water Quality
Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036.
Engineer: Nobu Murakami PE Stamp Below
Title Water Resources Engineer
Company SDH & Associates, Inc.
Address 27363 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590
Email nobu@sdhinc.net
Telephone # (951) 683-3691
Signature
Date
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Contents ii
Table of Contents
Section 1 Discretionary Permits ......................................................................................... 1-1
Section 2 Project Description ............................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Project Information ........................................................................................ 2-1
2.2 Property Ownership / Management .............................................................. 2-2
2.3 Potential Stormwater Pollutants ................................................................... 2-3
2.4 Water Quality Credits ........ 2-4
Section 3 Site and Watershed Description ......................................................................... 3-1
Section 4 Best Management Practices ................................................................................ 4-1
4.1 Source Control BMP ....................................................................................... 4-1
4.1.1 Pollution Prevention ................................................................................... 4-1
4.1.2 Preventative LID Site Design Practices ....................................................... 4-6
4.2 Project Performance Criteria......................................................................... 4-7
4.3 Project Conformance Analysis ....................................................................... 4-12
4.3.1 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP .............................................. 4-14
4.3.2 Infiltration BMP .......................................................................................... 4-16
4.3.3 Harvest and Use BMP .................................................................................. 4-18
4.3.4 Biotreatment BMP....................................................................................... 4.19
4.3.5 Conformance Summary ............................................................................... 4-23
4.3.6 Hydromodification Control BMP ............................................................... 4-24
4.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (if applicable) ................................................. 4-25
Section 5 Inspection & Maintenance Responsibility Post Construction BMPs ................. 5-1
Section 6 Site Plan and Drainage Plan ................................................................................ 6-1
6.1. Site Plan and Drainage Plan.......................................................................... 6-1
6.2 Electronic Data Submittal ............................................................................. 6-1
Forms
Form 1-1 Project Information ............................................................................................... 1-1
Form 2.1-1 Description of Proposed Project ......................................................................... 2-1
Form 2.2-1 Property Ownership/Management ..................................................................... 2-2
Form 2.3-1 Pollutants of Concern ......................................................................................... 2-3
Form 2.4-1 Water Quality Credits ......................................................................................... 2-4
Form 3-1 Site Location and Hydrologic Features ................................................................. 3-1
Form 3-2 Hydrologic Characteristics .................................................................................... 3-2
Form 3-3 Watershed Description .......................................................................................... 3-3
Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMP ................................................................... 4-2
Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMP .......................................................................... 4-4
Form 4.1-3 Site Design Practices Checklist ........................................................................... 4-6
Form 4.2-1 LID BMP Performance Criteria for Design Capture Volume ............................. 4-7
Form 4.2-2 Summary of HCOC Assessment .......................................................................... 4-8
Form 4.2-3 HCOC Assessment for Runoff Volume ............................................................... 4-9
Form 4.2-4 HCOC Assessment for Time of Concentration .................................................. 4-10
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Contents iii
Form 4.2-5 HCOC Assessment for Peak Runoff .................................................................... 4-11
Form 4.3-1 Infiltration BMP Feasibility ................................................................................ 4-13
Form 4.3-2 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP ..................................................... 4-14
Form 4.3-3 Infiltration LID BMP ........................................................................................... 4-17
Form 4.3-4 Harvest and Use BMP ......................................................................................... 4-18
Form 4.3-5 Selection and Evaluation of Biotreatment BMP ................................................ 4-19
Form 4.3-6 Volume Based Biotreatment Bioretention and Planter Boxes w/Underdrains 4-20
Form 4.3-7 Volume Based Biotreatment- Constructed Wetlands and Extended Detention 4-21
Form 4.3-8 Flow Based Biotreatment ................................................................................... 4-22
Form 4.3-9 Conformance Summary and Alternative Compliance Volume Estimate .......... 4-23
Form 4.3-10 Hydromodification Control BMP ..................................................................... 4-24
Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance ........................................................................ 5-1
Attachment 1: Preliminary BMP Site Plan and Typical Details
Attachment 2: NOAA Atals 14 Point Precipitation Depth
Attachment 3: Geotechnical Investigation Report
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
1-1
Section 1 Discretionary Permit(s)
Form 1-1 Project Information
Project Name 6th Street Industrial
Project Owner Contact Name: Dennis Higgs
Mailing
Address:
230 California Street, Suite 510,
San Francisco, CA 94111
E-mail
Address: ddh@newcastlepartners.com Telephone: (951) 582-9800
Permit/Application Number(s): TBD Tract/Parcel Map Number(s): TBD
Additional Information/
Comments:
Based on the Web Soil Survey (online resources), the project is situated on NRCS Soil Group
A. Based on the project-specific geotechnical investigation report, the soils at the proposed
project has relatively field infiltration rates (i.e. 3.1 in/hr at 5 feet deep and 1.7 in/hr at 10
feet deep). The lower field infiltration rate of 1.7 in/hr was utilized for design purpose. With
an appropriate factor of safety, the design infiltration rate of 0.76 in/hr was used to size the
proposed BMP.
Description of Project:
Newcastle Partners is proposing to develop an industrial tilt-up warehouse building and
associated parking and landscape areas as part of this project, which is located at the 9910
block of 6th Street near the intersection of Hermosa Road and 6th Street in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga (within San Bernardino County), California. The property net area is
approximately 4.6 acres. The Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 0209-211-42, 0209-211-43. The
proposed site is approximately 4.55 acres. The proposed warehouse building footprints are
expected to be approximately 49,130 square feet and 25,923 square feet, respectively as
well as approximately ~106 auto parking. The proposed impervious and pervious footprints
within the on-site drainage management area are approximately 158,895 square feet and
22,980 square feet, respectively.
Provide summary of Conceptual
WQMP conditions (if previously
submitted and approved). Attach
complete copy.
N/A
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
2-1
Section 2 Project Description
2.1 Project Information
This section of the WQMP should provide the information listed below. The information provided for
Conceptual/ Preliminary WQMP should give sufficient detail to identify the major proposed site design and LID
BMPs and other anticipated water quality features that impact site planning. Final Project WQMP must
specifically identify all BMP incorporated into the final site design and provide other detailed information as
described herein.
The purpose of this information is to help determine the applicable development category, pollutants of
concern, watershed description, and long term maintenance responsibilities for the project, and any applicable
water quality credits. This information will be used in conjunction with the information in Section 3, Site
Description, to establish the performance criteria and to select the LID BMP or other BMP for the project or
other alternative programs that the project will participate in, which are described in Section 4.
Form 2.1-1 Description of Proposed Project
1 Development Category (Select all that apply):
Significant re-development
involving the addition or
replacement of 5,000 ft2 or
more of impervious surface on
an already developed site
New development involving
the creation of 10,000 ft2 or
more of impervious surface
collectively over entire site
Automotive repair
shops with standard
industrial classification (SIC)
codes 5013, 5014, 5541,
7532- 7534, 7536-7539
Restaurants (with SIC
code 5812) where the land
area of development is
5,000 ft2 or more
Hillside developments of
5,000 ft2 or more which are
located on areas with known
erosive soil conditions or
where the natural slope is
25 percent or more
Developments of 2,500 ft2
of impervious surface or more
adjacent to (within 200 ft) or
discharging directly into
environmentally sensitive areas
or waterbodies listed on the
CWA Section 303(d) list of
impaired waters.
Parking lots of 5,000 ft2
or more exposed to storm
water
Retail gasoline outlets
that are either 5,000 ft2 or
more, or have a projected
average daily traffic of 100
or more vehicles per day
Non-Priority / Non-Category Project May require source control LID BMPs and other LIP requirements. Please consult with local
jurisdiction on specific requirements.
2 Project Area (ft2): 198,227 (Net) 3 Number of Dwelling Units: N/A 4 SIC Code: 1541 (TBD)
5 Is Project going to be phased? Yes No If yes, ensure that the WQMP evaluates each phase as a distinct DA, requiring LID
BMPs to address runoff at time of completion.
6 Does Project include roads? Yes No If yes, ensure that applicable requirements for transportation projects are addressed (see
Appendix A of TGD for WQMP)
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
2-2
2.2 Property Ownership/Management
Describe the ownership/management of all portions of the project and site. State whether any infrastructure
will transfer to public agencies (City, County, Caltrans, etc.) after project completion. State if a homeowners or
property owners association will be formed and be responsible for the long-term maintenance of project
stormwater facilities. Describe any lot-level stormwater features that will be the responsibility of individual
property owners.
Form 2.2-1 Property Ownership/Management
Describe property ownership/management responsible for long-term maintenance of WQMP stormwater facilities:
Newcastle Partners is expected to assume responsibility for the long-term operations and maintenance of the proposed project
including the proposed permanent storm water best management practices (BMPs).
Newcastle Partners
230 California Street, Suite 510
San Francisco, CA 94111
(951) 582-9800
ATTN: Dennis Higgs
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
2-3
2.3 Potential Stormwater Pollutants
Determine and describe expected stormwater pollutants of concern based on land uses and site activities (refer
to Table 3-3 in the TGD for WQMP).
Form 2.3-1 Pollutants of Concern
Pollutant
Please check:
E=Expected, N=Not
Expected
Additional Information and Comments
Pathogens (Bacterial / Virus) E N
Nutrients - Phosphorous E N
Nutrients - Nitrogen E N
Noxious Aquatic Plants E N
Sediment E N
Metals E N
Oil and Grease E N
Trash/Debris E N
Pesticides / Herbicides E N
Organic Compounds E N
Other: E N
Other: E N
Other: E N
Other: E N
Other: E N
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
2-4
2.4 Water Quality Credits
A water quality credit program is applicable for certain types of development projects if it is not feasible to meet
the requirements for on-site LID. Proponents for eligible projects, as described below, can apply for water
quality credits that would reduce project obligations for selecting and sizing other treatment BMP or
participating in other alternative compliance programs. Refer to Section 6.2 in the TGD for WQMP to
determine if water quality credits are applicable for the project.
Form 2.4-1 Water Quality Credits
1 Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits: Select all that apply
Redevelopment projects that
reduce the overall impervious
footprint of the project site.
[Credit = % impervious reduced]
Higher density
development projects
Vertical density [20%]
7 units/ acre [5%]
Mixed use development,
(combination of residential,
commercial, industrial, office,
institutional, or other land uses
which incorporate design principles
that demonstrate environmental
benefits not realized through single
use projects) [20%]
Brownfield
redevelopment
(redevelop real property
complicated by presence
or potential of hazardous
contaminants) [25%]
Redevelopment projects in
established historic district,
historic preservation area, or
similar significant core city center
areas [10%]
Transit-oriented
developments (mixed use
residential or commercial
area designed to maximize
access to public
transportation) [20%]
In-fill projects (conversion of
empty lots & other underused
spaces < 5 acres, substantially
surrounded by urban land uses, into
more beneficially used spaces, such
as residential or commercial areas)
[10%]
Live-Work
developments (variety of
developments designed
to support residential and
vocational needs) [20%]
2 Total Credit % (Total all credit percentages up to a maximum allowable credit of 50 percent)
Description of Water Quality
Credit Eligibility (if applicable)
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
3-1
Section 3 Site and Watershed Description
Describe the project site conditions that will facilitate the selection of BMP through an analysis of the physical
conditions and limitations of the site and its receiving waters. Identify distinct drainage areas (DA) that collect
flow from a portion of the site and describe how runoff from each DA (and sub-watershed DMAs) is conveyed
to the site outlet(s). Refer to Section 3.2 in the TGD for WQMP. The form below is provided as an example.
Then complete Forms 3.2 and 3.3 for each DA on the project site. If the project has more than one
drainage area for stormwater management, then complete additional versions of
these forms for each DA / outlet.
Form 3-1 Site Location and Hydrologic Features
Site coordinates take GPS
measurement at approximate
center of site
Latitude 34° 5'8.15"N Longitude 117°35'18.45"W Thomas Bros Map page 804
1 San Bernardino County climatic region: Valley Mountain
2 Does the site have more than one drainage area (DA): Yes No If no, proceed to Form 3-2. If yes, then use this form to show a
conceptual schematic describing DMAs and hydrologic feature connecting DMAs to the site outlet(s). An example is provided below that can be
modified for proposed project or a drawing clearly showing DMA and flow routing may be attached
N/A since the project has only one drainage area.
Conveyance Briefly describe on-site drainage features to convey runoff that is not retained within a DMA
DA1 DMA C flows to
DA1 DMA A DMA 1 to existing catch basin on SE corner of property
DA1 DMA A to Outlet 1
DA1 DMA B to Outlet 1
DA2 to Outlet 2
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
3-2
Form 3-2 Existing Hydrologic Characteristics for Drainage Area 1
For Drainage Area 1 -watershed DMA,
provide the following characteristics DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D
1 DMA drainage area (ft2) 181,875
2 Existing site impervious area (ft2) ~184,145
3 Antecedent moisture condition For desert
areas, use
http://www.sbcounty.gov/dpw/floodcontrol/pdf/2
0100412_map.pdf
I
4 Hydrologic soil group Refer to Watershed
Mapping Tool
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
A
5 Longest flowpath length (ft) 700
6 Longest flowpath slope (ft/ft) 0.016
7 Current land cover type(s) Select from Fig C-3
of Hydrology Manual
Commercial
Landscaping
8 Pre-developed pervious area condition:
Based on the extent of wet season vegetated cover
good >75%; Fair 50-75%; Poor <50% Attach photos
of site to support rating
Poor
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
3-3
Form 3-2 Existing Hydrologic Characteristics for Drainage Area 1
(use only as needed for additional DMA w/in DA 1)
For sub-watershed DMA,
provide the following characteristics DMA E DMA F DMA G DMA H
1 DMA drainage area (ft2)
2 Existing site impervious area (ft 2)
3 Antecedent moisture condition For desert
areas, use
http://www.sbcounty.gov/dpw/floodcontrol/pdf/2
0100412_map.pdf
4 Hydrologic soil group Refer to Watershed
Mapping Tool
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
5 Longest flowpath length (ft)
6 Longest flowpath slope (ft/ft)
7 Current land cover type(s) Select from Fig C-3
of Hydrology Manual
8 Pre-developed pervious area condition:
Based on the extent of wet season vegetated cover
good >75%; Fair 50-75%; Poor <50% Attach photos
of site to support rating
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
3-4
Form 3-3 Watershed Description for Drainage Area
Receiving waters
Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool -
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
link at this website
Deer Creek
Turner Basin
Cucamonga Channel
San Antonio Channel
Prado Dam
Santa Ana River Reach 2
Santa Ana River Reach 1
Pacific Ocean
Applicable TMDLs
Refer to Local Implementation Plan
Santa Ana River Reach 3: Pathogens, Nitrate
Prado Basin: Pathogens
303(d) listed impairments
Refer to Local Implementation Plan and Watershed
Mapping Tool
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/ and State
Water Resources Control Board website
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_iss
ues/programs/tmdl/index.shtml
Based on the 2014/2016 California Integrated Report:
Santa Ana River Reach 3: Copper, Indicator Bacteria, Lead
Prado Basin: pH
Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA)
Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
N/A No direct discharge into ESAs
Unlined Downstream Water Bodies
Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool
http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
Santa Ana River Reach 3
Prado Basin
Santa Ana River Reach 2
Santa Ana River Reach 1
Hydrologic Conditions of Concern
Yes Complete Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Assessment. Include Forms
4.2-2 through Form 4.2-5 and Hydromodification BMP Form 4.3-10 in submittal
No
Watershed based BMP included in a RWQCB
approved WAP
Yes Attach verification of regional BMP evaluation criteria in WAP
More Effective than On-site LID
Remaining Capacity for Project DCV
Upstream of any Water of the US
Operational at Project Completion
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
3-5
Long-Term Maintenance Plan
No
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-1
Section 4 Best Management Practices (BMP)
4.1 Source Control BMP
4.1.1 Pollution Prevention
Non-structural and structural source control BMP are required to be incorporated into all new development
and significant redevelopment projects. Form 4.1-1 and 4.1-2 are used to describe specific source control BMPs
used in the WQMP or to explain why a certain BMP is not applicable. Table 7-3 of the TGD for WQMP provides
a list of applicable source control BMP for projects with specific types of potential pollutant sources or activities.
The source control BMP in this table must be implemented for projects with these specific types of potential
pollutant sources or activities.
The preparers of this WQMP have reviewed the source control BMP requirements for new development and
significant redevelopment projects. The preparers have also reviewed the specific BMP required for project as
specified in Forms 4.1-1 and 4.1-2. All applicable non-structural and structural source control BMP shall be
implemented in the project.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-2
Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR,
if not applicable, state reason Included Not
Applicable
N1 Education of Property Owners, Tenants
and Occupants on Stormwater BMPs
Relevant educational materials will be provided to the first tenants regarding general
on-site storm water BMPs and maintenance requirements.
N2 Activity Restrictions It is anticipated that use restrictions are to be developed by a building operator through
lease terms.
N3 Landscape Management BMPs Landscape areas are expected to be maintained with efficient water use.
N4 BMP Maintenance BMP maintenance will be implemented in accordance with the Operation and
Maintenance (O&M) Plan.
N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance
(How development will comply)
Hazardous waste management is not anticipated.
N6 Local Water Quality Ordinances The project will comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter
19.20.
N7 Spill Contingency Plan A spill contingency plan will be prepared by the building operator in accordance with
CASQA BMP Handbook SC-11.
N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance The proposed underground storage will follow applicable regulations by the County
Environmental Health.
N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure
Compliance
The site is expected to comply with the City Ordinance and/or County San Bernardino
Code of Ordinances.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-3
Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR,
if not applicable, state reason Included Not
Applicable
N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation Uniform Fire Code Implementation shall be in compliance with Article 80 of the Uniform
Fire Code enforced by fire protection agency.
N11 Litter/Debris Control Program The owner shall contract with a landscape maintenance company to provide trash
management and litter control procedures.
N12 Employee Training Employees shall be trained to regarding on-site storm water BMPs, general maintenance
requirements, and protection of surface storm water quality.
N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks
Industrial loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a regular
program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken
containers.
N14 Catch Basin Inspection Program On-site catch basins shall be inspected and, if necessary, cleaned prior to the storm
season, no later than October 15th each year.
N15 Vacuum Sweeping of Private Streets and
Parking Lots
Privately owned streets and parking lots shall be swept prior to the storm season, no
later than October 15th each year.
N16 Other Non-structural Measures for Public
Agency Projects
N17 Comply with all other applicable NPDES
permits
The project will comply with the NPDES Construction General Permit Industrial General
Permit (if applicable, dependent of end user).
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-4
Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR,
If not applicable, state reason Included Not
Applicable
S1 Provide storm drain system stencilling and signage
(CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-13)
Stenciling or labeling of on-site storm drain catch basins will be provided with
icons to discourage illegal dumping.
S2
Design and construct outdoor material storage
areas to reduce pollution introduction (CASQA
New Development BMP Handbook SD-34)
Outdoor material storage areas are not anticipated to be applicable.
S3
Design and construct trash and waste storage
areas to reduce pollution introduction (CASQA
New Development BMP Handbook SD-32)
Trash and waste storage areas are expected to have covers and drainage from
adjoining roofs and pavements diverted around the areas.
S4
Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape
design, water conservation, smart controllers, and
source control (Statewide Model Landscape
Ordinance; CASQA New Development BMP
Handbook SD-12)
Landscape and irrigation systems shall be implemented as shown on the
Landscape and Irrigation Plans approved by a licensed professional in the state of
California and follow guidance per CASQA BMP Handbook SD-12.
S5
Finish grade of landscaped areas at a minimum of
1-2 inches below top of curb, sidewalk, or
pavement
Finish grade of landscaped areas shall be graded to a minimum of 1-2 inches below
top of curb side walk or pavement in order to help promote dispersion of runoff
from paved surfaces to drain to the landscape areas.
S6
Protect slopes and channels and provide energy
dissipation (CASQA New Development BMP
Handbook SD-10)
Proposed slopes (if applicable) are expected to be vegetated.
S7 Covered dock areas (CASQA New Development
BMP Handbook SD-31)
Loading dock areas preclude run-on from adjacent drive aisle or parking areas.
S8
Covered maintenance bays with spill containment
plans (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook
SD-31)
Maintenance bays are not expected for this project.
S9 Vehicle wash areas with spill containment plans
(CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-33)
Vehicle wash areas are not expected for this project.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-5
S10 Covered outdoor processing areas (CASQA New
Development BMP Handbook SD-36)
Outdoor processing areas not expected for this project.
Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR,
If not applicable, state reason Included Not
Applicable
S11
Equipment wash areas with spill containment
plans (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook
SD-33)
Equipment wash areas are not expected for this project.
S12 Fueling areas (CASQA New Development BMP
Handbook SD-30)
Fueling areas not expected for this project.
S13 Hillside landscaping (CASQA New Development
BMP Handbook SD-10)
There will be landscaping areas for this project; however, steep hillside
landscaping area is not expected for this project.
S14 Wash water control for food preparation areas Food preparation areas not expected for this project.
S15 Community car wash racks (CASQA New
Development BMP Handbook SD-33)
Community car wash racks are not expected for this project.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-6
4.1.2 Preventative LID Site Design Practices
Site design practices associated with new LID requirements in the MS4 Permit should be considered in the earliest
phases of a project. Preventative site design practices can result in smaller DCV for LID BMP and hydromodification
control BMP by reducing runoff generation. Describe site design and drainage plan including:
Refer to Section 5.2 of the TGD for WQMP for more details.
Form 4.1-3 Preventative LID Site Design Practices Checklist
Site Design Practices
If yes, explain how preventative site design practice is addressed in project site plan. If no, other LID BMPs must be selected to meet targets
Minimize impervious areas: Yes No
Explanation: Parking lot spaces are close to the minimum required counts and they have been designed with more efficient
lane sizes.
Maximize natural infiltration capacity: Yes No
Explanation: Where practicable, runoff from the paved surfaces is being directed to the landscape areas in an effort to help
promote incidental infiltration and evaporation.
Preserve existing drainage patterns and time of concentration: Yes No
Explanation: The existing site is a heavy industrial site and it already has large amount of impervious surfaces. The proposed
drainage pattern and time of concentration are expected to be maintained similar as compared to the existing condition.
Disconnect impervious areas: Yes No
Explanation: Where practicable and feasible, runoff from the paved surfaces will be directed to the landscape areas.
Protect existing vegetation and sensitive areas: Yes No
Explanation: The existing site is developed and there is not much of vegetation.
Re-vegetate disturbed areas: Yes No
Explanation: There is not enough vegetation on the existing site.
Minimize unnecessary compaction in stormwater retention/infiltration basin/trench areas: Yes No
Explanation: Most of the proposed landscape areas are around the building and along perimeter. As such the landscaped areas
are expected to be undisturbed, minimizing unnecessary compaction.
Utilize vegetated drainage swales in place of underground piping or imperviously lined swales: Yes No
Explanation: Based on the proposed grades and required local sump catch basins, runoff would need to be piped directly to a
proposed infiltration BMP.
Stake off areas that will be used for landscaping to minimize compaction during construction : Yes No
Explanation: Staking will be provided for proposed landscaped areas.
A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices
A narrative of how site plan incorporates preventive site design practices
Include an attached Site Plan layout which shows how preventative site design practices are included in
WQMP
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-7
4.2 Project Performance Criteria
The purpose of this section of the Project WQMP is to establish targets for post-development hydrology based on
performance criteria specified in the MS4 Permit. These targets include runoff volume for water quality control
(referred to as LID design capture volume), and runoff volume, time of concentration, and peak runoff for
protection of any downstream waterbody segments with a HCOC. If the project has more than one
outlet for stormwater runoff, then complete additional versions of these forms for each
DA / outlet.
Methods applied in the following forms include:
For LID BMP Design Capture Volume (DCV), the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program requires use of
the P6 method (MS4 Permit Section XI.D.6a.ii) Form 4.2-1
For HCOC pre- and post-development hydrologic calculation, the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program
requires the use of the Rational Method (San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual Section D). Forms 4.2-2
through Form 4.2-5 calculate hydrologic variables including runoff volume, time of concentration, and peak
runoff from the project site pre- and post-development using the Hydrology Manual Rational Method approach.
For projects greater than 640 acres (1.0 mi2), the Rational Method and these forms should not be used. For such
projects, the Unit Hydrograph Method (San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual Section E) shall be applied
for hydrologic calculations for HCOC performance criteria.
Refer to Section 4 in the TGD for WQMP for detailed guidance and instructions.
Form 4.2-1 LID BMP Performance Criteria for Design Capture Volume
(DA 1)
1 Project area DA 1 (ft2):
181,875
2 Imperviousness after applying preventative
site design practices (Imp%): 87%
3 Runoff Coefficient (Rc): 0.69
Rc = 0.858(Imp%)^3-0.78(Imp%)^2+0.774(Imp%)+0.04
4 Determine 1-hour rainfall depth for a 2-year return period P2yr-1hr (in): 0.611 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html
5 Compute P6, Mean 6-hr Precipitation (inches): 0.905
P6 = Item 4 *C1, where C1 is a function of site climatic region specified in Form 3-1 Item 1 (Valley = 1.4807; Mountain = 1.909; Desert = 1.2371)
6 Drawdown Rate
Use 48 hours as the default condition. Selection and use of the 24 hour drawdown time condition is subject to approval
by the local jurisdiction. The necessary BMP footprint is a function of drawdown time. While shorter drawdown times
reduce the performance criteria for LID BMP design capture volume, the depth of water that can be stored is also
reduced.
24-hrs
48-hrs
7 Compute design capture volume, DCV (ft3): 18,578
DCV = 1/12 * [Item 1* Item 3 *Item 5 * C2], where C2 is a function of drawdown rate (24-hr = 1.582; 48-hr = 1.963)
Compute separate DCV for each outlet from the project site per schematic drawn in Form 3-1 Item 2
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-8
Form 4.2-2 Summary of HCOC Assessment (DA 1)
Does project have the potential to cause or contribute to an HCOC in a downstream channel: Yes No
Go to: http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/
If es , then complete HCOC assessment of site hydrology for 2yr storm event using Forms 4.2-3 through 4.2-5 and insert results below
(Forms 4.2-3 through 4.2-5 may be replaced by computer software analysis based on the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual)
If o, then proceed to Section 4.3 Project Conformance Analysis
Condition Runoff Volume (ft3) Time of Concentration (min) Peak Runoff (cfs)
Pre-developed
1
Form 4.2-3 Item 12
2
Form 4.2-4 Item 13
3
Form 4.2-5 Item 10
Post-developed
4
Form 4.2-3 Item 13
5
Form 4.2-4 Item 14
6
Form 4.2-5 Item 14
Difference
7
Item 4 Item 1
8
Item 2 Item 5
9
Item 6 Item 3
Difference
(as % of pre-developed)
10 %
Item 7 / Item 1
11 %
Item 8 / Item 2
12 %
Item 9 / Item 3
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-9
Form 4.2-3 HCOC Assessment for Runoff Volume (DA 1)
Weighted Curve Number
Determination for:
Pre-developed DA
DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D DMA E DMA F DMA G DMA H
1a Land Cover type
2a Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG)
3a DMA Area, ft2 sum of areas of
DMA should equal area of DA
4a Curve Number (CN) use Items
1 and 2 to select the appropriate CN
from Appendix C-2 of the TGD for
WQMP
Weighted Curve Number
Determination for:
Post-developed DA
DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D DMA E DMA F DMA G DMA H
1b Land Cover type
2b Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG)
3b DMA Area, ft2 sum of areas of
DMA should equal area of DA
4b Curve Number (CN) use Items
5 and 6 to select the appropriate CN
from Appendix C-2 of the TGD for
WQMP
5 Pre-Developed area-weighted CN: 7 Pre-developed soil storage capacity, S (in):
S = (1000 / Item 5) - 10
9 Initial abstraction, Ia (in):
Ia = 0.2 * Item 7
6 Post-Developed area-weighted CN: 8 Post-developed soil storage capacity, S (in):
S = (1000 / Item 6) - 10
10 Initial abstraction, Ia (in):
Ia = 0.2 * Item 8
11 Precipitation for 2 yr, 24 hr storm (in):
Go to: http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html
12 Pre-developed Volume (ft3):
Vpre =(1 / 12) * (Item sum of Item 3) * [(Item 11 Item 9)^2 / ((Item 11 Item 9 + Item 7)
13 Post-developed Volume (ft3):
Vpre =(1 / 12) * (Item sum of Item 3) * [(Item 11 Item 10)^2 / ((Item 11 Item 10 + Item 8)
14 Volume Reduction needed to meet HCOC Requirement, (ft3):
VHCOC = (Item 13 * 0.95) Item 12
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-10
Form 4.2-4 HCOC Assessment for Time of Concentration (DA 1)
Compute time of concentration for pre and post developed conditions for each DA (For projects using the Hydrology Manual complete the
form below)
Variables
Pre-developed DA1
Use additional forms if there are more than 4 DMA
Post-developed DA1
Use additional forms if there are more than 4 DMA
DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D
1 Length of flowpath (ft) Use Form 3-2
Item 5 for pre-developed condition
2 Change in elevation (ft)
3 Slope (ft/ft), So = Item 2 / Item 1
4 Land cover
5 Initial DMA Time of Concentration
(min) Appendix C-1 of the TGD for WQMP
6 Length of conveyance from DMA
outlet to project site outlet (ft)
May be zero if DMA outlet is at project
site outlet
7 Cross-sectional area of channel (ft2)
8 Wetted perimeter of channel (ft)
9
10 Channel flow velocity (ft/sec)
Vfps = (1.49 / Item 9) * (Item 7/Item 8)^0.67
* (Item 3)^0.5
11 Travel time to outlet (min)
Tt = Item 6 / (Item 10 * 60)
12 Total time of concentration (min)
Tc = Item 5 + Item 11
13 Pre-developed time of concentration (min): Minimum of Item 12 pre-developed DMA
14 Post-developed time of concentration (min): Minimum of Item 12 post-developed DMA
15 Additional time of concentration needed to meet HCOC requirement (min): TC-HCOC = (Item 13 * 0.95) Item 14
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-11
Form 4.2-5 HCOC Assessment for Peak Runoff (DA 1)
Compute peak runoff for pre- and post-developed conditions
Variables
Pre-developed DA to Project
Outlet (Use additional forms if
more than 3 DMA)
Post-developed DA to Project
Outlet (Use additional forms if
more than 3 DMA)
DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA A DMA B DMA C
1 Rainfall Intensity for storm duration equal to time of concentration
Ipeak = 10^(LOG Form 4.2-1 Item 4 - 0.6 LOG Form 4.2-4 Item 5 /60)
2 Drainage Area of each DMA (Acres)
For DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream DMA (Using example
schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C)
3 Ratio of pervious area to total area
For DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream DMA (Using example
schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C)
4 Pervious area infiltration rate (in/hr)
Use pervious area CN and antecedent moisture condition with Appendix C-3 of the TGD
for WQMP
5 Maximum loss rate (in/hr)
Fm = Item 3 * Item 4
Use area-weighted Fm from DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream
DMA (Using example schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C)
6 Peak Flow from DMA (cfs)
Qp =Item 2 * 0.9 * (Item 1 - Item 5)
7 Time of concentration adjustment factor for other DMA to
site discharge point
Form 4.2-4 Item 12 DMA / Other DMA upstream of site discharge
point (If ratio is greater than 1.0, then use maximum value of 1.0)
DMA A n/a n/a
DMA B n/a n/a
DMA C n/a n/a
8 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA A:
Qp = Item 6DMAA + [Item 6DMAB * (Item 1DMAA - Item
5DMAB)/(Item 1DMAB - Item 5DMAB)* Item 7DMAA/2] +
[Item 6DMAC * (Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAC)/(Item 1DMAC -
Item 5DMAC)* Item 7DMAA/3]
9 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA B:
Qp = Item 6DMAB + [Item 6DMAA * (Item 1DMAB - Item
5DMAA)/(Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAA)* Item 7DMAB/1] +
[Item 6DMAC * (Item 1DMAB - Item 5DMAC)/(Item 1DMAC -
Item 5DMAC)* Item 7DMAB/3]
10 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA C:
Qp = Item 6DMAC + [Item 6DMAA * (Item 1DMAC - Item
5DMAA)/(Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAA)* Item 7DMAC/1] +
[Item 6DMAB * (Item 1DMAC - Item 5DMAB)/(Item 1DMAB
- Item 5DMAB)* Item 7DMAC/2]
10 Peak runoff from pre-developed condition confluence analysis (cfs): Maximum of Item 8, 9, and 10 (including additional forms as needed)
11 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA A:
Same as Item 8 for post-developed values
12 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA B:
Same as Item 9 for post-developed values
13 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA C:
Same as Item 10 for post-developed
values
14 Peak runoff from post-developed condition confluence analysis (cfs): Maximum of Item 11, 12, and 13 (including additional forms as
needed)
15 Peak runoff reduction needed to meet HCOC Requirement (cfs): Qp-HCOC = (Item 14 * 0.95) Item 10
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-12
4.3 Project Conformance Analysis
Complete the following forms for each project site DA to document that the proposed LID BMPs conform to the
project DCV developed to meet performance criteria specified in the MS4 Permit (WQMP Template Section
4.2). For the LID DCV, the forms are ordered according to hierarchy of BMP selection as required by the MS4
Permit (see Section 5.3.1 in the TGD for WQMP). The forms compute the following for on-site LID BMP:
Site Design and Hydrologic Source Controls (Form 4.3-2)
Retention and Infiltration (Form 4.3-3)
Harvested and Use (Form 4.3-4) or
Biotreatment (Form 4.3-5).
At the end of each form, additional fields facilitate the determination of the extent of mitigation provided by
the specific BMP category, allowing for use of the next category of BMP in the hierarchy, if necessary.
The first step in the analysis, using Section 5.3.2.1 of the TGD for WQMP, is to complete Forms 4.3-1 and 4.3-3)
to determine if retention and infiltration BMPs are infeasible for the project. For each feasibility criterion in
Form 4.3-1, if the ll study findings that includes relevant calculations, maps, data
sources, etc. used to make the determination of infeasibility.
Next, complete Forms 4.3-2 and 4.3-4 to determine the feasibility of applicable HSC and harvest and use BMPs,
and, if their implementation is feasible, the extent of mitigation of the DCV.
If no site constraints exist that would limit the type of BMP to be implemented in a DA, evaluate the use of
combinations of LID BMPs, including all applicable HSC BMPs to maximize on-site retention of the DCV. If no
combination of BMP can mitigate the entire DCV, implement the single BMP type, or combination of BMP
types, that maximizes on-site retention of the DCV within the minimum effective area.
If the combination of LID HSC, retention and infiltration, and harvest and use BMPs are unable to mitigate the
entire DCV, then biotreatment BMPs may be implemented by the project proponent. If biotreatment BMPs are
used, then they must be sized to provide sufficient capacity for effective treatment of the remainder of the
volume-based performance criteria that cannot be achieved with LID BMPs (TGD for WQMP Section 5.4.4.2).
Under no circumstances shall any portion of the DCV be released from the site without effective
mitigation and/or treatment.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-13
Form 4.3-1 Infiltration BMP Feasibility (DA 1)
Feasibility Criterion Complete evaluation for each DA on the Project Site
1 Would infiltration BMP pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Yes No
Refer to Section 5.3.2.1 of the TGD for WQMP
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
2 Would installation of infiltration BMP significantly increase the risk of geotechnical hazards? Yes No
(Yes, if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert):
The location is less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent
The location is less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback.
A study certified by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study determines that stormwater infiltration
would result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards.
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
3 Would infiltration of runoff on a Project site violate downstream water rights? Yes No
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on hydrologic soil group (HSG) D soils or does the site geotechnical investigation indicate
presence of soil characteristics, which support categorization as D soils? Yes No
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
5 Is the design infiltration rate, after accounting for safety factor of 2.0, below proposed facility less than 0.3 in/hr (accounting for
soil amendments)? Yes No
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
6 Would on-site infiltration or reduction of runoff over pre-developed conditions be partially or fully inconsistent with watershed
management strategies as defined in the WAP, or impair beneficial uses? Yes No
See Section 3.5 of the TGD for WQMP and WAP
If Yes, Provide basis: (attach)
7 Any answer from Item 1 through Item 3 : Yes No
If yes, infiltration of any volume is not feasible onsite. Proceed to Form 4.3-4, Harvest and Use BMP. If no, then proceed to Item 8
below.
8 Any answer from Item 4 through Item 6 Yes No
If yes, infiltration is permissible but is not required to be considered. Proceed to Form 4.3-2, Hydrologic Source Control BMP.
If no, then proceed to Item 9, below.
9 All answers to Item 1 through Item 6 o :
Infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, LID infiltration BMP must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the MEP.
Proceed to Form 4.3-2, Hydrologic Source Control BMP.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-14
4.3.1 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP
Section XI.E. of the Permit emphasizes the use of LID preventative measures; and the use of LID HSC BMPs
reduces the portion of the DCV that must be addressed in downstream BMPs. Therefore, all applicable HSC
shall be provided except where they are mutually exclusive with each other, or with other BMPs. Mutual
exclusivity may result from overlapping BMP footprints such that either would be potentially feasible by itself,
but both could not be implemented. Please note that while there are no numeric standards regarding the use of
HSC, if a project cannot feasibly meet BMP sizing requirements or cannot fully address HCOCs, feasibility of all
applicable HSC must be part of demonstrating that the BMP system has been designed to retain the maximum
feasible portion of the DCV. Complete Form 4.3-2 to identify and calculate estimated retention volume from
implementing site design HSC BMP. Refer to Section 5.4.1 in the TGD for more detailed guidance.
Form 4.3-2 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs (DA 1)
1 Implementation of Impervious Area Dispersion BMP (i.e.
routing runoff from impervious to pervious areas), excluding
impervious areas planned for routing to on-lot infiltration
BMP: Yes No If yes, complete Items 2-5; If no,
proceed to Item 6
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
2 Total impervious area draining to pervious area (ft2)
3 Ratio of pervious area receiving runoff to impervious area
4 Retention volume achieved from impervious area
dispersion (ft3) V = Item2 * Item 3 * (0.5/12), assuming retention
of 0.5 inches of runoff
5 Sum of retention volume achieved from impervious area dispersion (ft3): Vretention =Sum of Item 4 for all BMPs
6 Implementation of Localized On-lot Infiltration BMPs (e.g.
on-lot rain gardens): Yes No If yes, complete Items 7-
13 for aggregate of all on-lot infiltration BMP in each DA; If no,
proceed to Item 14
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
7 Ponding surface area (ft2)
8 Ponding depth (ft)
9 Surface area of amended soil/gravel (ft2)
10 Average depth of amended soil/gravel (ft)
11 Average porosity of amended soil/gravel
12 Retention volume achieved from on-lot infiltration (ft3)
Vretention = (Item 7 *Item 8) + (Item 9 * Item 10 * Item 11)
13 Runoff volume retention from on-lot infiltration (ft3): Vretention =Sum of Item 12 for all BMPs
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-15
Form 4.3-2 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs (DA 1)
Form 4.3-2 cont. Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs (DA 1)
14 Implementation of evapotranspiration BMP (green,
brown, or blue roofs): Yes No
If yes, complete Items 15-20. If no, proceed to Item 21
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
15 Rooftop area planned for ET BMP (ft2)
16 Average wet season ET demand (in/day)
Use local values, typical ~ 0.1
17 Daily ET demand (ft3/day)
Item 15 * (Item 16 / 12)
18 Drawdown time (hrs)
Copy Item 6 in Form 4.2-1
19 Retention Volume (ft3)
Vretention = Item 17 * (Item 18 / 24)
20 Runoff volume retention from evapotranspiration BMPs (ft3): Vretention =Sum of Item 19 for all BMPs
21 Implementation of Street Trees: Yes No
If yes, complete Items 22-25. If no, proceed to Item 26
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
22 Number of Street Trees
23 Average canopy cover over impervious area (ft2)
24 Runoff volume retention from street trees (ft3)
Vretention = Item 22 * Item 23 * (0.05/12) assume runoff retention of
0.05 inches
25 Runoff volume retention from street tree BMPs (ft3): Vretention = Sum of Item 24 for all BMPs
26 Implementation of residential rain barrel/cisterns: Yes
No If yes, complete Items 27-29; If no, proceed to Item 30
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
27 Number of rain barrels/cisterns
28 Runoff volume retention from rain barrels/cisterns (ft3)
Vretention = Item 27 * 3
29 Runoff volume retention from residential rain barrels/Cisterns (ft3): Vretention =Sum of Item 28 for all BMPs
30 Total Retention Volume from Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs: Sum of Items 5, 13, 20, 25 and 29
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-16
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-17
4.3.2 Infiltration BMPs
Use Form 4.3-3 to compute on-site retention of runoff from proposed retention and infiltration BMPs. Volume
retention estimates are sensitive to the percolation rate used, which determines the amount of runoff that can
be infiltrated within the specified drawdown time. The infiltration safety factor reduces field measured
percolation to account for potential inaccuracy associated with field measurements, declining BMP
performance over time, and compaction during construction. Appendix D of the TGD for WQMP provides
guidance on estimating an appropriate safety factor to use in Form 4.3-3.
If site constraints limit the use of BMPs to a single type and implementation of retention and infiltration BMPs
mitigate no more than 40% of the DCV, then they are considered infeasible and the Project Proponent may
evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs lower in the LID hierarchy of use (Section 5.5.1 of the TGD for WQMP)
If implementation of infiltrations BMPs is feasible as determined using Form 4.3-1, then LID infiltration BMPs
shall be implemented to the MEP (section 4.1 of the TGD for WQMP).
.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-18
Form 4.3-3 Infiltration LID BMP - including underground BMPs (DA 1)
1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC BMP (ft3): 18,578 Vunmet = Form 4.2-1 Item 7 - Form 4.3-2 Item 30
BMP Type Use columns to the right to compute runoff volume retention
from proposed infiltration BMP (select BMP from Table 5-4 in TGD for
WQMP) - Use additional forms for more BMPs
DA 1 DMA A
BMP Type
Underground
Infiltration
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
2 Infiltration rate of underlying soils (in/hr) See Section 5.4.2 and
Appendix D of the TGD for WQMP for minimum requirements for
assessment methods
1.7
3 Infiltration safety factor See TGD Section 5.4.2 and Appendix D 2.25
4 Design percolation rate (in/hr) Pdesign = Item 2 / Item 3 0.76
5 Ponded water drawdown time (hr) Copy Item 6 in Form 4.2-1 48
6 Maximum ponding depth (ft) BMP specific, see Table 5-4 of the TGD
for WQMP for BMP design details
7.0
7 Ponding Depth (ft) dBMP = Minimum of (1/12*Item 4*Item 5) or Item 6 3.0
8 Infiltrating surface area, SABMP (ft2) the lesser of the area needed for
infiltration of full DCV or minimum space requirements from Table 5.7 of
the TGD for WQMP
2,672
9 Amended soil depth, dmedia (ft) Only included in certain BMP types,
see Table 5-4 in the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details
N/A
10 Amended soil porosity N/A
11 Gravel depth, dmedia (ft) Only included in certain BMP types, see
Table 5-4 of the TGD for WQMP for BMP design details
N/A
12 Gravel porosity N/A
13 Duration of storm as basin is filling (hrs) Typical ~ 3hrs 3
14 Infiltration Volume as basin is filling (ft3) Vretention = Item 4 / 12 *
Item 8 * Item 13
508
15 Underground Retention Volume (ft3) Volume determined using
18,704
16 Total Retention Volume from LID Infiltration BMPs: 19,212 (Sum of Items 14 and 15 for all infiltration BMP included in plan)
17 Fraction of DCV achieved with infiltration BMP: 103% Retention% = Item 16 / Form 4.2-1 Item 7
18 Is full LID DCV retained onsite with combination of hydrologic source control and LID retention/infiltration BMPs? Yes No
If yes, demonstrate conformance using Form 4.3-10; If no, then reduce Item 3, Factor of Safety to 2.0 and increase Item 8, Infiltrating Surface Area, such that
the portion of the site area used for retention and infiltration BMPs equals or exceeds the minimum effective area thresholds (Table 5-7 of the TGD for WQMP)
for the applicable category of development and repeat all above calculations.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-19
4.3.3 Harvest and Use BMP
Harvest and use BMP may be considered if the full LID DCV cannot be met by maximizing infiltration BMPs.
Use Form 4.3-4 to compute on-site retention of runoff from proposed harvest and use BMPs.
Volume retention estimates for harvest and use BMPs are sensitive to the on-site demand for captured
stormwater. Since irrigation water demand is low in the wet season, when most rainfall events occur in San
Bernardino County, the volume of water that can be used within a specified drawdown period is relatively low.
The bottom portion of Form 4.3-4 facilitates the necessary computations to show infeasibility if a minimum
incremental benefit of 40 percent of the LID DCV would not be achievable with MEP implementation of on-site
harvest and use of stormwater (Section 5.5.4 of the TGD for WQMP).
Form 4.3-4 Harvest and Use BMPs (DA 1)
1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC or infiltration BMP (ft3):
Vunmet = Form 4.2-1 Item 7 - Form 4.3-2 Item 30 Form 4.3-3 Item 16
BMP Type(s) Compute runoff volume retention from proposed
harvest and use BMP (Select BMPs from Table 5-4 of the TGD for
WQMP) - Use additional forms for more BMPs
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
2 Describe cistern or runoff detention facility
3 Storage volume for proposed detention type (ft3) Volume of
cistern
4 Landscaped area planned for use of harvested stormwater
(ft2)
5 Average wet season daily irrigation demand (in/day)
Use local values, typical ~ 0.1 in/day
6 Daily water demand (ft3/day) Item 4 * (Item 5 / 12)
7 Drawdown time (hrs) Copy Item 6 from Form 4.2-1
8Retention Volume (ft3)
Vretention = Minimum of (Item 3) or (Item 6 * (Item 7 / 24))
9 Total Retention Volume (ft3) from Harvest and Use BMP Sum of Item 8 for all harvest and use BMP included in plan
10 Is the full DCV retained with a combination of LID HSC, retention and infiltration, and harvest & use BMPs? Yes No
If yes, demonstrate conformance using Form 4.3-10. If no, then re-evaluate combinations of all LID BMP and optimize their implementation
such that the maximum portion of the DCV is retained on-site (using a single BMP type or combination of BMP types). If the full DCV cannot
be mitigated after this optimization process, proceed to Section 4.3.4.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-20
4.3.4 Biotreatment BMP
Biotreatment BMPs may be considered if the full LID DCV cannot be met by maximizing retention and
infiltration, and harvest and use BMPs. A key consideration when using biotreatment BMP is the effectiveness
of the proposed BMP in addressing the pollutants of concern for the project (see Table 5-5 of the TGD for
WQMP).
Use Form 4.3-5 to summarize the potential for volume based and/or flow based biotreatment options to
biotreat the remaining unmet LID DCV w. Biotreatment computations are included as follows:
Use Form 4.3-6 to compute biotreatment in small volume based biotreatment BMP (e.g. bioretention w/underdrains);
Use Form 4.3-7 to compute biotreatment in large volume based biotreatment BMP (e.g. constructed wetlands);
Use Form 4.3-8 to compute sizing criteria for flow-based biotreatment BMP (e.g. bioswales)
Form 4.3-5 Selection and Evaluation of Biotreatment BMP (DA 1)
1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC,
infiltration, or harvest and use BMP for potential
biotreatment (ft3): Form 4.2-1 Item 7 - Form 4.3-2
Item 30 Form 4.3-3 Item 16- Form 4.3-4 Item 9
List pollutants of concern Copy from Form 2.3-1.
2 Biotreatment BMP Selected
(Select biotreatment BMP(s)
necessary to ensure all pollutants of
concern are addressed through Unit
Operations and Processes, described
in Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP)
Volume-based biotreatment
Use Forms 4.3-6 and 4.3-7 to compute treated volume
Flow-based biotreatment
Use Form 4.3-8 to compute treated volume
Bioretention with underdrain
Planter box with underdrain
Constructed wetlands
Wet extended detention
Dry extended detention
Vegetated swale
Vegetated filter strip
Proprietary biotreatment
3 Volume biotreated in volume based
biotreatment BMP (ft3): Form 4.3-
6 Item 15 + Form 4.3-7 Item 13
4 Compute remaining LID DCV with
implementation of volume based biotreatment
BMP (ft3): Item 1 Item 3
5 Remaining fraction of LID DCV for
sizing flow based biotreatment BMP:
% Item 4 / Item 1
6 Flow-based biotreatment BMP capacity provided (cfs): Use Figure 5-2 of the TGD for WQMP to determine flow capacity required to
3-1 Item 1)
7 Metrics for MEP determination:
Provided a WQMP with the portion of site area used for suite of LID BMP equal to minimum thresholds in Table 5-7 of the
TGD for WQMP for the proposed category of development: If maximized on-site retention BMPs is feasible for partial capture,
then LID BMP implementation must be optimized to retain and infiltrate the maximum portion of the DCV possible within the prescribed
minimum effective area. The remaining portion of the DCV shall then be mitigated using biotreatment BMP.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-21
Form 4.3-6 Volume Based Biotreatment (DA 1)
Bioretention and Planter Boxes with Underdrains
Biotreatment BMP Type
(Bioretention w/underdrain, planter box w/underdrain, other
comparable BMP)
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
1 Pollutants addressed with BMP List all pollutant of concern that
will be effectively reduced through specific Unit Operations and
Processes described in Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP
2 Amended soil infiltration rate Typical ~ 5.0
3 Amended soil infiltration safety factor Typical ~ 2.0
4 Amended soil design percolation rate (in/hr) Pdesign = Item 2 /
Item 3
5 Ponded water drawdown time (hr) Copy Item 6 from Form 4.2-1
6 Maximum ponding depth (ft) see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP
for reference to BMP design details
7 Ponding Depth (ft) dBMP = Minimum of (1/12 * Item 4 * Item 5) or
Item 6
8 Amended soil surface area (ft2)
9 Amended soil depth (ft) see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for
reference to BMP design details
10 Amended soil porosity, n
11 Gravel depth (ft) see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference
to BMP design details
12 Gravel porosity, n
13 Duration of storm as basin is filling (hrs) Typical ~ 3hrs
14 Biotreated Volume (ft3) Vbiotreated = Item 8 * [(Item 7/2) + (Item 9
* Item 10) +(Item 11 * Item 12) + (Item 13 * (Item 4 / 12))]
15 Total biotreated volume from bioretention and/or planter box with underdrains BMP:
Sum of Item 14 for all volume-based BMPs included in this form
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-22
Form 4.3-7 Volume Based Biotreatment (DA 1)
Constructed Wetlands and Extended Detention
Biotreatment BMP Type
Constructed wetlands, extended wet detention, extended dry detention,
or other comparable proprietary BMP. If BMP includes multiple modules
(e.g. forebay and main basin), provide separate estimates for storage
and pollutants treated in each module.
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
Forebay Basin Forebay Basin
1 Pollutants addressed with BMP forebay and basin
List all pollutant of concern that will be effectively reduced through
specific Unit Operations and Processes described in Table 5-5 of the TGD
for WQMP
2 Bottom width (ft)
3 Bottom length (ft)
4 Bottom area (ft2) Abottom = Item 2 * Item 3
5 Side slope (ft/ft)
6 Depth of storage (ft)
7 Water surface area (ft2)
Asurface =(Item 2 + (2 * Item 5 * Item 6)) * (Item 3 + (2 * Item 5 * Item 6))
8 Storage volume (ft3) For BMP with a forebay, ensure fraction of
total storage is within ranges specified in BMP specific fact sheets, see
Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details
V =Item 6 / 3 * [Item 4 + Item 7 + (Item 4 * Item 7)^0.5]
9 Drawdown Time (hrs) Copy Item 6 from Form 2.1
10 Outflow rate (cfs) QBMP = (Item 8forebay + Item 8basin) / (Item 9 * 3600)
11 Duration of design storm event (hrs)
12 Biotreated Volume (ft3)
Vbiotreated = (Item 8forebay + Item 8basin) +( Item 10 * Item 11 * 3600)
13 Total biotreated volume from constructed wetlands, extended dry detention, or extended wet detention :
(Sum of Item 12 for all BMP included in plan)
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-23
Form 4.3-8 Flow Based Biotreatment (DA 1)
Biotreatment BMP Type
Vegetated swale, vegetated filter strip, or other comparable proprietary
BMP
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
DA DMA
BMP Type
(Use additional forms
for more BMPs)
1 Pollutants addressed with BMP
List all pollutant of concern that will be effectively reduced through
specific Unit Operations and Processes described in TGD Table 5-5
2 Flow depth for water quality treatment (ft)
BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP
design details
3 Bed slope (ft/ft)
BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP
design details
4 Manning's roughness coefficient
5 Bottom width (ft)
bw = (Form 4.3-5 Item 6 * Item 4) / (1.49 * Item 2^1.67 * Item 3^0.5)
6 Side Slope (ft/ft)
BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP
design details
7 Cross sectional area (ft2)
A = (Item 5 * Item 2) + (Item 6 * Item 2^2)
8 Water quality flow velocity (ft/sec)
V = Form 4.3-5 Item 6 / Item 7
9 Hydraulic residence time (min)
Pollutant specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to
BMP design details
10 Length of flow based BMP (ft)
L = Item 8 * Item 9 * 60
11 Water surface area at water quality flow depth (ft2)
SAtop = (Item 5 + (2 * Item 2 * Item 6)) * Item 10
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-24
4.3.5 Conformance Summary
Complete Form 4.3-9 to demonstrate how on-site LID DCV is met with proposed site design hydrologic source
control, infiltration, harvest and use, and/or biotreatment BMP. The bottom line of the form is used to describe
the basis for infeasibility determination for on-site LID BMP to achieve full LID DCV, and provides methods for
computing remaining volume to be addressed in an alternative compliance plan. If the project has more than
one outlet, then complete additional versions of this form for each outlet.
Form 4.3-9 Conformance Summary and Alternative
Compliance Volume Estimate (DA 1)
1 Total LID DCV for the Project DA-1 (ft3): 18,578 Copy Item 7 in Form 4.2-1
2 On-site retention with site design hydrologic source control LID BMP (ft3): 0 Copy Item 30 in Form 4.3-2
3 On-site retention with LID infiltration BMP (ft3): 19,212 Copy Item 16 in Form 4.3-3
4 On-site retention with LID harvest and use BMP (ft3): N/A Copy Item 9 in Form 4.3-4
5 On-site biotreatment with volume based biotreatment BMP (ft3): N/A Copy Item 3 in Form 4.3-5
6 Flow capacity provided by flow based biotreatment BMP (cfs): N/A Copy Item 6 in Form 4.3-5
7 LID BMP performance criteria are achieved if answer to any of the following is es :
Full retention of LID DCV with site design HSC, infiltration, or harvest and use BMP: Yes No
If yes, sum of Items 2, 3, and 4 is greater than Item 1
Combination of on-site retention BMPs for a portion of the LID DCV and volume-based biotreatment BMP that
address all pollutants of concern for the remaining LID DCV: Yes No
If yes, a) sum of Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 is greater than Item 1, and Items 2, 3 and 4 are maximized; or b) Item 6 is greater than Form
4.3--5 Item 6 and Items 2, 3 and 4 are maximized
On-site retention and infiltration is determined to be infeasible and biotreatment BMP provide biotreatment for all
pollutants of concern for full LID DCV: Yes No
If yes, Form 4.3-1 Items 7 and 8 were both checked yes
8 If the LID DCV is not achieved by any of these means, then the project may be allowed to develop an alternative
compliance plan. Check box that describes the scenario which caused the need for alternative compliance:
Combination of HSC, retention and infiltration, harvest and use, and biotreatment BMPs provide less than full LID DCV
capture:
Checked yes for Form 4.3-5 Item 7, Item 6 is zero, and sum of Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 is less than Item 1. If so, apply water quality credits
and calculate volume for alternative compliance, Valt = (Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5) * (100 - Form 2.4-1 Item 2)%
An approved Watershed Action Plan (WAP) demonstrates that water quality and hydrologic impacts of urbanization
are more effective when managed in at an off-site facility:
Attach appropriate WAP section, including technical documentation, showing effectiveness comparisons for the project site and
regional watershed
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-25
4.3.6 Hydromodification Control BMP
Use Form 4.3-10 to compute the remaining runoff volume retention, after LID BMP are implemented, needed to
address HCOC, and the increase in time of concentration and decrease in peak runoff necessary to meet targets
for protection of waterbodies with a potential HCOC. Describe hydromodification control BMP that address
HCOC, which may include off-site BMP and/or in-stream controls. Section 5.6 of the TGD for WQMP provides
additional details on selection and evaluation of hydromodification control BMP.
Form 4.3-10 Hydromodification Control BMPs (DA 1)
1 Volume reduction needed for HCOC
performance criteria (ft3): N/A
(Form 4.2-2 Item 4 * 0.95) Form 4.2-2 Item 1
2 On-site retention with site design hydrologic source control, infiltration, and
harvest and use LID BMP (ft3): Sum of Form 4.3-9 Items 2, 3, and 4 Evaluate
option to increase implementation of on-site retention in Forms 4.3-2, 4.3-3, and 4.3-4 in
excess of LID DCV toward achieving HCOC volume reduction
3 Remaining volume for HCOC
volume capture (ft3): Item 1
Item 2
4 Volume capture provided by incorporating additional on-site or off-site retention BMPs
(ft3): Existing downstream BMP may be used to demonstrate additional volume capture (if
so, attach to this WQMP a hydrologic analysis showing how the additional v olume would be retained
during a 2-yr storm event for the regional watershed)
5 If Item 4 is less than Item 3, incorporate in-stream controls on downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to
hydromodification Attach in-stream control BMP selection and evaluation to this WQMP
6 Is Form 4.2-2 Item 11 less than or equal to 5%: Yes No
If yes, HCOC performance criteria is achieved. If no, select one or more mitigation options below:
Demonstrate increase in time of concentration achieved by proposed LID site design, LID BMP, and additional on-site
or off-site retention BMP
BMP upstream of a waterbody segment with a potential HCOC may be used to demonstrate increased time of concentration through
hydrograph attenuation (if so, show that the hydraulic residence time provided in BMP for a 2-year storm event is equal or greater
than the addition time of concentration requirement in Form 4.2-4 Item 15)
Increase time of concentration by preserving pre-developed flow path and/or increase travel time by reducing slope
and increasing cross-sectional area and roughness for proposed on-site conveyance facilities
Incorporate appropriate in-stream controls for downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to
hydromodification, in a plan approved and signed by a licensed engineer in the State of California
7 Form 4.2-2 Item 12 less than or equal to 5%: Yes No
If yes, HCOC performance criteria is achieved. If no, select one or more mitigation options below:
Demonstrate reduction in peak runoff achieved by proposed LID site design, LID BMPs, and additional on-site or off-
site retention BMPs
BMPs upstream of a waterbody segment with a potential HCOC may be used to demonstrate additional peak runoff reduction
through hydrograph attenuation (if so, attach to this WQMP, a hydrograph analysis showing how the peak runoff would be reduced
during a 2-yr storm event)
Incorporate appropriate in-stream controls for downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to
hydromodification, in a plan approved and signed by a licensed engineer in the State of California
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
4-26
4.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (if applicable)
Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable) for projects not fully able to infiltrate, harvest and use,
or biotreat the DCV via on-site LID practices. A project proponent must develop an alternative compliance plan
to address the remainder of the LID DCV. Depending on project type some projects may qualify for water
quality credits that can be applied to reduce the DCV that must be treated prior to development of an
alternative compliance plan (see Form 2.4-1, Water Quality Credits). Form 4.3-9 Item 8 includes instructions on
how to apply water quality credits when computing the DCV that must be met through alternative compliance.
Alternative compliance plans may include one or more of the following elements:
On-site structural treatment control BMP - All treatment control BMP should be located as close to
possible to the pollutant sources and should not be located within receiving waters;
Off-site structural treatment control BMP - Pollutant removal should occur prior to discharge of runoff to
receiving waters;
Urban runoff fund or In-lieu program, if available
Depending upon the proposed alternative compliance plan, approval by the executive officer may or may not be
required (see Section 6 of the TGD for WQMP).
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
5-1
Section 5 Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP
All BMP included as part of the project WQMP are required to be maintained through regular scheduled
inspection and maintenance (refer to Section 8, Post Construction BMP Requirements, in the TGD for WQMP).
Fully complete Form 5-1 summarizing all BMP included in the WQMP. Attach additional forms as needed. The
WQMP shall also include a detailed Operation and Maintenance Plan for all BMP and may require a
Maintenance Agreement (consult the LIP). If a Maintenance Agreement is required, it must also
be attached to the WQMP.
Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance
(use additional forms as necessary)
BMP Reponsible
Party(s)
Inspection/ Maintenance
Activities Required
Minimum Frequency
of Activities
BMP 1
Underground
Infiltration Facility
(StormTrap
SingleTrap)
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
Inspect monthly or
after every 0.5-inch
or greater storm
event
N1
Education of Property
Owners, Tenants and
Occupants on
Stormwater BMPs
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
Initially developed
and provided to first
tenants by the
developer. Also
available through
City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
N2
Activity Restrictions Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N3
Landscape
Management
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N4
BMP Maintenance Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N6
City of Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal
Code Compliance
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at the
time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N7
Spill Contingency Plan Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
5-2
N9
Hazardous Materials
Disclosure Compliance
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N10
Uniform Fire Code
Implementation
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N11
Litter Control Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N12
Employee Training Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N13
Housekeeping of
Loading Docks
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N14
Catch Basin Inspection Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N15
Vacuum Sweeping of
Private Streets and
Parking Lots
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
N17
Comply with all other
applicable NPDES
permits
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
S1
Provide storm drain
system stenciling and
signage
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
S3
Design and construct
trash and waste storage
areas to reduce
pollution introduction
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
S4
Use efficient irrigation
system & landscape
design, water
conservation, smart
controllers and source
control
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
S5
Finish grade of
landscaped areas
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
S6
Protect slopes and
channels and provide
Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
5-3
energy dissipation
S7
Loading dock areas Owner Inspection/maintenance activities to be provided at
the time of Final WQMP.
As-needed into
perpetuity.
6-1
Section 6 WQMP Attachments
6.1. Site Plan and Drainage Plan
Include a site plan and drainage plan sheet set containing the following minimum information:
6.2 Electronic Data Submittal
Minimum requirements include submittal of PDF exhibits in addition to hard copies. Format must not require
specialized software to open. If the local jurisdiction requires specialized electronic document formats (as
described in their local Local Implementation Plan), this section will describe the contents (e.g., layering,
nomenclature, geo-referencing, etc.) of these documents so that they may be interpreted efficiently and
accurately.
6.3 Post Construction
Attach all O&M Plans and Maintenance Agreements for BMP to the WQMP.
6.4 Other Supporting Documentation
BMP Educational Materials
Activity Restriction
*Note: Applicable O&M Plans and Maintenance Agreements for BMP, BMP educational materials,
activity restrictions C, C&
Project location
Site boundary
Land uses and land covers, as applicable
Suitability/feasibility constraints
Structural Source Control BMP locations
Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP locations
LID BMP details
Drainage delineations and flow information
Drainage connections
H04
I
H02
A
U
H12
H09
III
V
H11
IV
H08
H07
X
H05
H03
H06
J
VII
F
H01
VI
VIII
B
E
W
H10
IX
XIII
II
G
C
H02B
H02A
II
H12
II I 10
STATE HWY 60
STATE HWY 210
I 10 - I 15
STATE HWY 210
STATE HWY 60
Seven Oaks Dam, COE
San Antonio Basin #9
Seven Oaks Dam, COE
San Antonio Dam
Seven Oaks Dam, COE [DSOD]
Seven Oaks Dam, COE
Waterman Spreading Grounds
Seven Oaks Dam, COE
Wineville Basin
San Sevaine Basin #5 [DSOD]
Prado Dam
Twin Creek Spreading Grounds
Riverside Basin
Jurupa Basin [DSOD]
Waterman Basin #1
San Antonio Basin #5
San Antonio Basin #2
Cucamonga Basin #6
Plunge Creek Spreading Grounds
Victoria Basin
City Creek Spreading GroundsSan Antonio Basin #8
Devil Basin #7
Rich Basin
Potato Creek Spreading Grounds
Patton Basin
Lytle Creek Gatehouse, COE
Cactus Basin #3b
Cactus Basin #5
Brooks Basin
8th Street Basin #1
Mojave River Forks Dam; COE [DSOD]
Linden Basin
Wiggins Basin #1
Ely Basin #2
Cactus Basin #2
Declez Basin [DSOD]
Turner Basin #1
Banana Basin
Day Creek Dam [DSOD]
Grove Avenue Basin
Etiwanda Conservation Basin
Bledsoe Basin
Montclair Basin #2
Sycamore Basin
Devil Basin #4
Church Street Basin
Lower Cucamonga Sprdg Grnds
Warm Creek Conservation Basin #4
Ranchero Basin
Montclair Basin #1
College Heights Basin #4
College Heights Basin #1
Bailey Basin
Montclair Basin #4
Mountain View Basin
Wilson Creek Basin #3
San Timoteo Sediment Basin #3
Hillside Basin, COE
Wildwood Basin #2
Demens Basin #2 Dynamite Basin
San Timoteo Sediment Basin #18
Sand Canyon Basin
San Timoteo Sediment Basin #13
Perris Hill Basin
13th Street Basin
Cook Canyon Basin
Legend
Regional Board Boundary
County Boundary
DrainageCourse
<all other values>
Hydromodification
EHM
Low
Medium
High
High (Default)
Government Land
State of California Land
United States of America Land
City Boundary
Freeways
Basins and Dams
HCOC Exempt Areas
None Exempt
HCOC Exempt
A
B
C
E
F
G
H01
H02
H02A
H02B
H03
H04
H05
H06
H07
H08
H09
H10
H11
H12
I
II
III
IV
IX
J
U
V
VI
VII
VIII
W
X
XIII
Figure F-1
1
Hydromodification
A.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Analysis
HCOC Exemption:
1.Sump Condition: All downstream conveyance channel to an adequate sump (for
example, Prado Dam, Santa Ana River, or other Lake, Reservoir or naturally erosion
resistant feature) that will receive runoff from the project are engineered and regularly
maintained to ensure design flow capacity; no sensitive stream habitat areas will be
adversely affected; or are not identified on the Co-Permittees Hydromodification
Sensitivity Maps.
2.Pre = Post: The runoff flow rate, volume and velocity for the post-development
condition of the Priority Development Project do not exceed the pre-development (i.e,
naturally occurring condition for the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall event utilizing latest San
Bernardino County Hydrology Manual.
a.Submit a substantiated hydrologic analysis to justify your request.
3.Diversion to Storage Area: The drainage areas that divert to water storage areas which
are considered as control/release point and utilized for water conservation.
a.See Appendix F for the HCOC Exemption Map and the on-line Watershed
Geodatabase (http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/wap) for reference.
4.Less than One Acre: The Priority Development Project disturbs less than one acre. The
Co-permittee has the discretion to require a Project Specific WQMP to address HCOCs
on projects less than one acre on a case by case basis. The project disturbs less than one
acre and is not part of a common plan of development.
5.Built Out Area: The contributing watershed area to which the project discharges has a
developed area percentage greater than 90 percent.
a.See Appendix F for the HCOC Exemption Map and the on-line Watershed
Geodatabase (http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/wap) for reference.
2
Summary of HCOC Exempted Area
HCOC Exemption reasoning
1 2 3 4 5
Area
A X X
B X
C X
E X
F X
G X X
H01 X X
H02 X X
H02A X X
H02B X
H03 X
H04 X X
H05 X
H06 X
H07 X
H08 X X
H09 X
H10 X X
H11 X X
H12 X
J X
U X
W X
I X
II X
III X
IV X X
V X*
VI X
VII X
VIII X
IX X
X X
XIII X
*Detention/Conservation Basin
A.Call to Order
Design Review Committee Meeting
Rains Conference Room
Meeting Agenda
April 4, 2023
FINAL MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
6:00 p.m.
The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on April 4, 2023. The meeting was called to order by
Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:00 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chair Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner
James Daniels.
Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner.
B.Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 28, 2023.
Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented.
D.Project Review Items
D1. DESIGN REVIEW -NEWCASTLE PARTNERS - A request to demolish an existing office/warehouse
building and its associated parking lot/outdoor storage area and construct two industrial/warehouse buildings
totaling 74,387 square-feet within the Neo Industrial (NI) District, located at 9910 6th Street. APNs: 0209-
211-42 and -43 (Design Review DRC2022-00301 ).
The Committee took the following action:
Staff presented the item to the Design Review Committee. After staff's presentation, the applicant, Courtney
Smith noted that the applicant has worked diligently with the city to produce the site plan for the site, shows
two industrial/warehouse buildings. The two smaller buildings (as opposed to one large building) are being
proposed per the direction of staff, which communicated to the applicant the need for smaller industrial
buildings per the expectations of the site's Neo Industrial Employment General Plan designation.
Commissioner Daniels asked the applicant if they foresee the conceptual floor plan on the two buildings to
change significantly when a tenant is obtained, especially in the context that the site provides the exact
number of parking spaces. The applicant responded saying that they do not anticipate changing the floor
plan significantly that would result in the need for more parking spaces. Staff also noted that there is
additional flexibility built into the code in the event that the site requires 2-3 more parking spaces than
intended, in the form of not counting hallways, mechanical rooms, or stairwells in the parking count.
Exhibit C
Commissioner Morales said he liked the project and thinks it would be a good addition to the city.
Commissioner Daniels thought that the proposed color scheme was too white and may not match the
surrounding industrial development. He asked if the applicant could provide an alternative color scheme.
The applicant agreed and said they will work with staff to provide additional color scheme.
The Design Review Committee voted to move the project forward to the full Planning Commission, with a
recommendation that the applicant provide additional color scheme for consideration during the Planning
Commission hearing.
Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote, with the understanding that the applicant will provide the commission
with an alternative color pallette.
D2. DESIGN REVIEW – FOOTHILL LANDING PROPERTY OWNER, LLC – A request for a site plan and
design review to construct a mixed-use development comprising 360 residential units (including 3 live-work
units), 4,200 square feet of commercial lease area, and 3,100 square feet of live-work commercial lease
area on 6.14 acres of land at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue in the Corridor
2 (CO2) Zone. APN: 1100-161-01, 02, and 03 (Design Review DRC2022-00280).
The Committee took the following action:
The Design Review Committee received staff’s report and asked questions related to the number of parking
spaces (covered vs. uncovered), SB330 applications, the height and visibility of the parking garage, and the
amenities. Staff responded that the difference between the total number of garage parking spaces and the
covered parking spaces was due to the uncovered top deck of the parking garage, that State Bill 330 locks
in the development standards for a project once the SB330 request is submitted, that the garage is 5 stories
tall with 6 levels of parking (including the roof parking) and that a condition of approval will be added to the
project requiring architectural enhancement if visible. Commissioner Daniels asked if there was any feedback
related to the height of the building at the neighborhood meeting. Staff responded that there were no
participants at the neighborhood meeting. The applicant provided an overview of the project amenities and
stated that they do not believe that the upper level of the garage will be visible. The commissioners stated
that the project was well designed and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning
Commission for final review.
Recommend approval to PC/PD. 2-0 Vote, with the understanding that staff will compose a condition
requiring that the exterior wall of the structure be painted to match the roof.
E.Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning and Economic Development Department
Approved:
Design Review Committee Regular Meeting Minutes – April 4, 2023
Page 2 of 2
Final
DRC April 18, 2023 Meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00301, A
REQUEST TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING
OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING AND ITS ASSOCIATED
PARKING LOT/OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA AND
CONSTRUCT TWO INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS
TOTALING 74,387 SQUARE-FEET WITHIN THE NEO-
INDUSTRIAL (NI) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF 6TH STREET BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND
HERMOSA AVENUE AT 9910 6TH STREET; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0209-211-42 and
-43.
A.Recitals.
1. The applicant, Newcastle Partners, filed an application for the approval of Design
Review DRC2022-00301 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Design Review is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 25th day of October 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 25, 2023, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a property generally located on the north side of
6th Street between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; and
b.The project site is located on the north side of 6th Street between Archibald
Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. The site is comprised of two (2) parcels with an existing
office/warehouse building and parking lot. The project site is rectangular in shape, with
Exhibit D
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
DRC2022-00301– NEWCASTLE PARTNERS
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 2
frontage (width) of about 315 feet along 6th Street and a depth of approximately 520 feet
north to south. The frontage along 6th Street is currently improved with curb and gutter; and
c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the
project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site
Office/Warehouse
and Outdoor Storage
Area
Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
North Industrial/Warehouse Industrial
Employment
Industrial Employment
(IE)
South Industrial/Warehouse Industrial
Employment
Industrial Employment
(IE)
East Industrial Complex Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
West Industrial Complex Neo Industrial
Employment Neo Industrial (NI)
d. The two buildings in total are 74,387 square feet. Building 1 measures 25,635
square feet and is located toward the southerly portion of the site, closest to 6th Street.
Building 2 measures 48,752 square feet and is located toward the northerly portion of the
site. There will be one (1) employee break area for each building. No specific uses are
currently proposed for either of the two buildings. The site will be accessed via two
driveways from 6th Street. The parking and loading areas for Building 1 will not be gated,
while the rear parking and loading dock area of Building 2 will be gated; and
e. The building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of
three colors. The building will have form-lined concrete panels at various locations.
Additionally, the application of varying façade planes, windows and glass panels along the
building’s office frontages adds architectural interest to the façade. The glass paneling and
color treatments creates not only a focal point for the buildings but also a celebrated
entryway; and
f. The project complies with all development standards including building and
parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
DRC2022-00301– NEWCASTLE PARTNERS
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 3
*Max 70 feet as long as building is set back 1 foot from front setback for every 1-foot building height exceeds
35 feet.
g. Per table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is
based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. Parking
areas for the two buildings are evenly distributed across the entire project site, and all truck
loading and truck trailer parking areas are located away from public view. Required parking
for the project was calculated with the assumption that both buildings will be tenanted with
a warehouse use and an ancillary office. Based on the minimum parking requirement
calculations, building 1 will require 36 parking stalls and building 2 will require 65 parking
stalls. Therefore, the project will require a total of 101 vehicle parking stalls. The project
provides 101 stalls, meeting the parking requirement with the minimum parking provided for
each building on its own respective parcel. There are a total of 7 dock doors proposed
between the two buildings. Therefore, a matching number of trailer parking stalls are also
provided in compliance with Development Code requirements The following table breaks
down the parking calculation:
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
Development Standard Required Proposed In
Compliance?
Floor Area Ratio Max 0.6 0.38 YES
Front Setback – Bicycle
Corridor/Local Street Min. 25’ 91’-5” YES
Interior Side Setback Min. 5’ 37’ YES
Rear Setback Min. 0’ 56’-7” YES
Building Height Max 70’ * 39’ YES
Open Space / Landscape
Area Min. 10% 12.27% YES
Type of Use Square Footage
(Bldg 1 & 2)
Parking Ratio # of
Spaces
Required
# of
Spaces
Provided
Office 12,000
(3,500 & 8,500) 4/1,000 sf 48 48
Warehouse 62,387
(22,135 & 40,252)
1 per 1,000 sf for
first 20,000 sf; 1 per
2,000 sf for the next
20,000 sf; and 1 per
4,000 sf for the
remaining sf
53 53
Total 101 101
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
DRC2022-00301– NEWCASTLE PARTNERS
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 4
Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan in which the site is
located. The underlying General Plan designation is Neo-Industrial Employment District
which encourages industrial uses with buildings featuring modern designs. The proposed
project is to construct two warehouse/distribution buildings totaling 74,387 square feet;
each building consisting of office space and warehouse floor area. The building design
features a modern design with window glazing and concrete tilt-up walls; and
b. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of the Development
Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located in. The purpose of the Neo-
Industrial Zone is to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and
development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, etc. This
zone encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the
growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and
manufacturing. Although, no specific use or tenant is currently proposed for the building at
this time, the development of this building will accommodate industrial uses in the future;
and
c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined
in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape
depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site
planning, and architecture; and
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and surrounding properties are within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) zones.
4. The Planning and Econominc Development Department staff has determined that
the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the
project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable
General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)
the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than
five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a
habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not
result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5)
the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neo-
Industrial Empolyemnt District and Neo-Industrial zone, respectively, which permits the
development and operation of a warehouse/distribution building of the proposed size and
configuration. The project complies with the City’s development standards and design
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
DRC2022-00301– NEWCASTLE PARTNERS
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 5
guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project
site is located within the City limits and is surrounded by existing industrial development
and City infrastructure. The following are the four environmental factors that need to be
analyzed in order to determine that the project, respectively, qualifies for the Categorical
Exemption:
a. Traffic: The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Screening Analysis (Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc., November 2022) was
prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by
the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed warehouse
distribution use will create an estimated 127 daily trips with 13 AM peak hour trips
and 14 PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday. The analysis also
determined that for Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) volumes estimate 174 PCE
trips with 16 AM peak hour PCE trips and 18 PM peak hour PCE trips occurring
on a typical weekday. The Project would generate a low number of daily traffic
and peak hour trips and would not cause a measurable operational effect on local
roadways. Therefore, the proposed Project is not expected to generate 50 or
more trips during the AM or PM peak hour and does not require a traffic study.
The Project also includes a parking management plan (Urban Crossroads,
December 2022) to mitigate any potential parking conflicts.
b. Noise: A Noise and Vibration Analysis Report was prepared for the project
(Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc., January 2023). The analysis determined that the
construction and operational noise and vibration levels would not exceed the
City’s noise thresholds and no mitigation measures were necessary.
c. Air Quality: Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Kimley-Horn & Associates,
Inc., January 2023), emissions generated during construction and operation of
the Project would not exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District’s
(SCAQMD’s) significance thresholds. It was determined that the project would not
exceed screening levels established by the California Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment.
d. Water Quality: The project includes a grading and drainage plan consistent with
City regulations, as well as Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the Project (SDH &
Associates, Inc., August 2022).
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning and Economic Development
Department’s determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment,
concurs in the staff’s determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and
4 above, this Commission hereby approves the project subject to each and every condition
set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this
reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-24
DRC2022-00301– NEWCASTLE PARTNERS
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 6
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matt Marquez, Secretary
I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,
and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 2023, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1.The Design Review authorizes the Applicant to demolish an existing office/warehouse building and its
associated parking lot/outdoor storage area and construct two industrial/warehouse buildings totaling
74,387 square-feet within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District, located on the north side of 6th Street between
Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at 9910 6th Street; APNs: 0209-211-42 and -43.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the associated Lot Line Adjustment shall be approved and
recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. The Lot Line Adjustment shall be in
compliance with requirements set forth by the Development Code.
2.
3.Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the Applicant shall secure approval of a tree removal permit.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/9/2023
Exhibit E
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures)
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
4.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
5.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
6.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the
Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined
in 17.124.020.D.
If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building
permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.
If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an
application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to
the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate
the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.
If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be
subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the
proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
8.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
9.
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
10.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
11.
The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses shall be 15-gallon with 25 percent of all trees on a
project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size. Tree spacing for all industrial uses within perimeter
planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than
the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five
feet and ten feet, consistent with the city’s adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
13. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
14.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval
prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics
of the selected tree species.
15.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per
30 linear feet of building.
16.
All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design
shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.
17.
Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient
landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
18.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Development Code Chapter 17.74 Sign
Regulations for Private Property. Signage shall require separate application and approval by the
Planning Department and approval of a building permit by the Building and Safety Department prior to
installation of any signs.
19.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
20.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code.
21.
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
22.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
23.
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
24.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
25.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
26.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has
commenced, whichever comes first.
27.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
28.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standard 101.1.
"Per Resolution No. 87-96:
All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning
Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the
removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows:
1. Lines on the project side of the street.
a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developers expense.
b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical
at present for such reasons as short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not
undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing
improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6.
c. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future
developments as they occur on opposite sides of the street.
2. Lines on the opposite of the street from the project: The Developer shall pay a fee to the City for
one-half the amount per Section 6.
3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section 1 above and be eligible for
reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total
cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street."
2.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
“Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per
the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest
these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be
delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period.”
3.
The Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded prior to building permit issuance.4.
If any work is proposed within the railroad easement, it shall be approved/coordinated with the
appropriate parties.
5.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street
centerline):
44 total feet on 6th Street
6.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to grading permit
issuance. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
7.
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
8.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits.9.
Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within
the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If
there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.
10.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
11.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a.Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project
along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.
Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other
locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart,
unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified.
e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA
standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be
provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the
construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
13.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
14.
A signed consent and waiver form to join Landscape Maintenance District 3B shall be on file with the
Engineering Services Department and the owner shall enter into an Annexation Proceeding to join CFD
2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) and CFD 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) prior to issuance of
Building Permits. For any questions regarding the CFD annexation please contact Kelly Guerra at
909-774-2582.
15.
A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be
submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to issuance of Building
Permits. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall
be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District.
16.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.17.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
18.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.
19.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
6th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City “Collector” standards as required and
including:
1) Property Line Adjacent Sidewalk
2) Parkway
3) Curb & Gutter
4) Street lights shall be installed per City Standard 410, RCMU will be the electricity provider to the
streetlights. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City
owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements.
5) 2 through lanes, 7' bike lane and 3' buffer
6) Driveway approaches - shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy and City Standard 101
including minimum width for a commercial approaches.
7) Street Trees
8) AC Pavement
(a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check.
20.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
The fire access / fire lane and fire water mains cross existing property lines, are located on property not
under the control of the applicant or are located on a property that is being or could be subdivided. To
ensure continued Fire District use of and access to, and maintenance as needed, of the fire access /
fire lane and fire water mains, a reciprocal agreement between property owners and the Fire District is
required. The agreement is required to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder. A site
plan showing the location of the fire access / fire lane and fire water mains is required to be included
with the agreement. The agreement is required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire District prior to
recording. Proof of recordation is required to be submitted to the Fire District. A template of this
agreement has been included in Fire District Standard 5-10, which has been uploaded to the
Documents section.
1.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
2.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
5.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
6.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
7.
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building(s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and/or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
8.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
9.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
10.
Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
11.
Gates installed across a commercial/industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
12.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
13.
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
14.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that is installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
15.
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
16.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
17.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
18.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance
with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards.
The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current
RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA
and ADA regulations.
1.
Grading Section
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be
included within the engineered wall plans and calculations.
1.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter
wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department.
13.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
14.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Engineering
Services Department an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly
wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
15.
Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property
boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site
property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the
grading and drainage plan.
16.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
17.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail
sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
18.
Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
19.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared
and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water
drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient
calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed
and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet
calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the
proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway
culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit.
21.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
22.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
23.
Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the
project Conditions of Approval.
24.
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
25.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approved by
the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
26.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
27.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
28.
The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R’s as needed to clarify how maintenance
responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of
Parcel Map 5044 prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs
shall address shared access to 6th Street, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface
drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and
Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP.
29.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
30.
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
31.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or
any building permit.
32.
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the
locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall
include filters.
33.
Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall
provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable.
34.
The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance
agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment
devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements
executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included
within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states
that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the
maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment
device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall
include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the
maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP
document.
35.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
36.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
37.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
38.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
39.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or
maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used
car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a, b, d, f, h, i
above.
40.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1
(Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the
pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following
measures:
5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance – Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion
control ordinance.
5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) – Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion
by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping
BMP.
1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include,
but are not limited to, the following:
a. Scheduling construction activity.
b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil.
c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow.
d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils.
e. Erosion control to protect slopes.
f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts).
g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls).
h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site.
i. Stabilized construction exits.
j. Wind erosion control.
k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency.
2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be
considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the
following:
a. Material handling and waste management.
b. Building materials stockpile management.
c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.).
d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area.
e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site.
f. Spill prevention and control.
g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga).
41.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
Project #: DRC2022-00301
Project Name: Two (2) New Industrial Buildings
Location: 9910 6TH ST - 020921143-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10
(Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water
flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1. Swales.
2. Water collection and disposal systems.
3. French drains.
4. Water retention gardens.
5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater
recharge.
Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path.
42.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
43.
The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those
flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any
on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the
on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm
water drainage flows from the project site.
44.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19Printed: 10/9/2023
DATE:October 25, 2023
TO:Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development
INITIATED BY:Bond Mendez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – CAL MICRO RECYCLING, LLC - A request to operate
a mattress recycling and processing facility within an existing 58,543 square foot
industrial building within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, located east of Hermosa Avenue
and north of 4th Street at 9669 Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0210-371-09. This item is exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA
Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (DRC2023-00226).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2023-00226 through the
adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is requesting to operate a mattress recycling and processing facility (Cal Micro Recycling, LLC) in
an existing 58,543 square foot building located at 9669 Hermosa Avenue within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone
located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue approximately 175 feet north of 4th Street. The building was most
recently occupied by a manufacturing and distribution tenant, SwabPlus L.P., and has been continuously
occupied with a manufacturing and distribution use since 2003 as confirmed by the City business license records.
Figure 1: Aerial view of site located northeast of intersection at Hermosa Avenue and 4th Street.
Page 2 of 4
2
0
7
7
The 3.96-acre site is an irregular shaped parcel currently developed with an existing 58,543 square foot industrial
building, parking lot and landscaping improvements along Hermosa Avenue. The site is surrounded by various
industrial uses and office uses to the north, east and west, and residential uses to the south across 4th Street
which are located within the City of Ontario. The parcel is bound to the east by a flood control channel which
follows the curvature of the property line to Hermosa Avenue. There is one vacant parcel opposite the flood
channel from the site of the proposed use which was recently approved for the construction of two new industrial
buildings under a separate entitlement which is unrelated to this application. The existing building for the
proposed use sits approximately 500 feet north of 4th Street. The building will be used for the single tenant and
the applicant does not propose any changes or alterations to the building or site improvements.
The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are
as follows:
Table 1: Land Use Information
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
North Industrial Industrial
Employment District Industrial Employment (IE)
South Vacant Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
East Flood Channel General Open
Space and Facilities
Flood Control/Utility Corridor
(FC/UC)
West Industrial Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes to operate a mattress recycling and processing facility at the existing industrial property.
The facility includes a lobby and offices for administrative operations, a conference room, and open warehouse
floor area within the building. The site includes a controlled vehicular access gate for employees and for the pick-
up and drop-off of materials. The Mattress Recycling Council (MRC) will arrange for the transport of mattresses
to be recycled at the facility. The MRC is a nonprofit organization formed by the mattress industry to operate
recycling programs in those states that have enacted mattress recycling laws which currently includes California,
Connecticut and Rhode Island and is known as “Bye Bye Mattress” to consumers.
Indoor operations include offloading and storing of mattresses where the mattresses will then be disassembled,
sorted, and bailed or cubed by material type. The materials will either be loaded into a 53-foot trailer or a 40-
yard container where they will be transported to the designated end-consumer. Outdoor operations include the
trailer and container staging and pickup on-site. Once materials are picked up then they are transported off-site
to various material-specific recyclers. Outdoor operations also include a drop-off location for consumers. Each
consumer drop-off is limited to 5 mattresses daily. The drop-off for materials is located behind an existing screen
wall and will not be visible from the public right-of-way. The business anticipates 21 employees for production
and 3 employees for administration. Hours of operation will be 7:30 am – 3:30 pm Monday through Friday.
Page 3 of 4
2
0
7
7
Figure 2: Combined site plan and floor plan
Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.32.020.H.13, the City of Rancho Cucamonga defines such uses as
“Recycling facility, processing.” The Development Code defines the land use as a recycling facility located in a
building or enclosed space and used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials. Processing means
the preparation of material for efficient shipment or to an end-user’s specifications by such means as baling,
briquetting, compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, shredding, cleaning, and
remanufacturing. The use is permitted within the Neo-Industrial (NI) zone upon issuance of a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP).
Conditional Use Permit: The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a public review process for the
discretionary review of proposed uses and activities that require special consideration to ensure that their effects
are compatible with locational, use, structural, traffic, and/or the characteristics of neighboring properties and the
community. This process is intended to ensure land use compatibility and to mitigate potential impacts or conflicts
that could otherwise result from the proposed use.
Recycling facilities provide needed services to the region to divert waste from landfills that can be responsibly
broken down and base materials reused. These uses, however, can involve large quantities of outdoor storage
or inadvertently encourage dumping of materials during hours of non-operation. To combat these, conditions of
approval are included to identify that the business is not authorized to have outdoor storage of mattresses, and
that the facility shall have available gate access during all hours of operation to mitigate the potential for dumping.
Parking: Per table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is based on the proposed mix
of office and warehouse floor area in the building. Parking is located in front of the building along the frontage of
Hermosa Avenue and truck loading and truck trailer parking areas are located away from public view. Based on
the requirements for both office and warehouse use, the project will require a total of 47 vehicle parking stalls.
The site provides 57 stalls, exceeding the minimum parking requirement. There is also a total of 7 dock doors
proposed between the two buildings. Therefore, a matching number of trailer parking stalls are also provided in
Page 4 of 4
2
0
7
7
compliance with Development Code requirements The following table breaks down the parking calculation:
Table 2: Parking Analysis
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The Planning and Economic Development Department staff has determined that the project is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a
Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities Projects which includes
leasing of existing private structures and facilities.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations for the project site are Neo-Industrial Employment District
and Neo-Industrial zone, respectively, which permits the operation of a recycling and processing facility of the
proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City’s development standards and design
guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within
the City limits and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on October 12, 2023.
The property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,500-foot radius of the project
site on October 11, 2023. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
General Plan Policy LC-3.10 encourages businesses and development that will support and/or enhance the
operations of existing businesses when complimentary to the General Plan Vision while discouraging new
development and businesses that will have detrimental impacts to existing businesses and development. The
proposed recycling and processing facility will enhance our premier community status by providing a new
business that is complementary to the surrounding land uses and will provide additional employment
opportunities for City residents and the region. The project will fulfill the City Council goal of intentionally
embracing and anticipating for our future by providing well-developed warehouse distribution businesses in the
City while promoting environmentally sustainable practices.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Project Plans
Exhibit B – Draft Resolution
Exhibit C – Conditions of Approval
Type of Use Square
Footage
Parking Ratio # of
Spaces
Required
# of
Spaces
Provided
Office 3,200 4/1,000 sf 13 13
Warehouse 55,343
1 per 1,000 sf for first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000
sf for the next 20,000
sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf
for the remaining sf
34 44
Total 47 57
Exhibit A
Cal Micro Recycling, LLC
dba MAT Recyclers
Mattress Dismantlers and Recyclers of the following commodities:
Foam / Quilt
Wood
Metal
Process: Mattress are received by the designated logistic carriers by the State of CA – Mattress Recycling
Council. The units are dismantled and commodities are sent to approved customers and/or vendors
along with some material going to the landfill.
Hours of Operation: Monday – Friday 7:30 am – 3:30 pm
Employee Count: 21 Production Employees and 3 Administrative Employees
MAT Recyclers is an existing company that is currently operating in the city of Ontario. Our lease
obligations have risen substantially requiring us to make a move to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Tenant Occupancy: MAT Recyclers
August 23, 2023
DRC2023-00225 MAT Recyclers
Planning Department:
P1. lndoor: The Mattress Recycling Council will arrange for the transport of mattresses to be recycled to
our facility daily (Mon. - Fri.). The mattresses will be offloaded and stored in the designated area within
the warehouse. The "cutter" staff will separate the materials and additronal employees will designate the
following materials.
lndoorr Foam and Quilt commodities to be bailed (once ready for shipping) it will be loaded into a 53-
foot trailer daily and picked up by the designated customer. T
Outdoor; The wood materials will be loaded into a 4o-yard container and our roll off driver will take to
BeneficialAg in chino to be recycled. The metal commodity will be cubed and loaded into a 4o-yard
container and our rolloff river will take to SA Recycling in Pomona on a daily basis. Any materialthat is
lelt over will also be loaded into a 40 yard container and taken to West Valley in tontana.
The warehouse will be used for: 1) Storage of mattresses and 2)The dis-assembly of mattresses, bailing
of foam/quilt, and metal materials.
Office space: Offices will be limited to Operations Managet Accountant, and hybrid remote President,
The conference room to be used when the representatives from the Mattress Recycling Council perform
their visits, as well as other management visitors.
The business hours for consumer collection times will be from 7:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday to Friday.
Consumers are limited to 5 mattresses per day and the drop off locafion will be inside the yard gates, not
visible to the pu blic,
P2. See attached floor plan which includes the location of: "Cutter" stations, bailing machines, break
room and storaBe space.
Fire Prevention: New Construction Unit:
A. Mattresses will be stored only in designated areas (10 units in height - not to exceed 8 ft.)for
storage purposes prior to distribution to the "cutters". Bailed Foam/euilt will also be stored in
designated area after bailing. Metal will be stored in the outdoor containers.
B. Mattress materials consist of: toam, Quilt toppers, wood, and metal.
C. Mattresses will be stored at a limit of 10 units, not to exceed 8ft,
D. Dismantled mattresses will be stored in designated areas after the materials have been bailed.
i. The daily mattress count that is received can be from 800 - 1200, these will be distributed to the
"cutters" for the next day of produchon. All other materials will consist of the 2 prior days of
production. will be kept on site.
RESOLUTION NO. 23-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2023-00226, A REQUEST TO
ESTABLISH A MATTRESS RECYCLING AND PROCESSING
FACILITY WITHIN AN EXISTING 58,543 SQUARE FOOT
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITHIN THE NEO-INDUSTRIAL (NI)
ZONE, LOCATED EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND NORTH
OF 4TH STREET AT 9669 HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-371-09.
A.Recitals.
1.The Applicant, Cal Micro Recycling, LLC, filed an application for Conditional Use
Permit DRC2023-00226, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 25th day of October 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 25, 2023, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The project site consists of approximately 3.96 acres of developed land and is
located east of Hermosa Avenue between and north of 4th Street; and
b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
North Industrial Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
South Vacant Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
East Flood Channel General Open Space Flood Control/Utility Corridor
Exhibit B
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-25
DRC2023-00226 CAL MICRO RECYCLING, LLC
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan designation, Neo-Industrial
Employment (NI) District, which encourages low industrial uses with minimal impact and to
support the growth of creative and new businesses. The site is developed with an existing
industrial building, parking, and landscaping. A recycling and processing facility will have minimal
impact on adjacent uses and properties and authorizing the use will support the growth of a new
business. The operations of the recycling facility will take place indoors and the site access will
be controlled by a security gate and further provides efficient on-site circulation and parking
management. The proposed used is consistent with the general plan.
b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and
purposes of the applicable zone as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations and
standards. A recycling and processing facility is allowed in the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone upon the
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The use is consistent with the zoning designation and
development code in that the use does not propose any expansions or modifications which will
not result in any new development and remains consistent with its current development pattern.
The Development Code does not have specific regulations or standards to apply to the operations
of a recycling and processing facility however, included conditions of approval mitigate any
potential impacts by prohibiting outdoor storage and requiring access to the facility for efficient
drop-off operations. The site is not subject to any specific plans.
c. The site is suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use. The
site is improved with an existing industrial building including access and circulation, parking,
structures, utilities, and landscaping. No changes are proposed to the site except for associated
tenant improvements and signage which may be proposed under a separate permit. The
proposed use is similar in intensity to existing uses in the immediate surrounding area. No
additional physical constraints have been added that may impede the operation of the existing
surrounding land use nor the proposed land use. Therefore, the project site is well-suited for the
proposed use.
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use
would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including
transportation and service facilities. The recycling and processing facility will operate primarily
within an existing building and will not operate beyond the project parcel nor onto the property of
adjacent similar uses. The intensity of the use is not expected to exceed the intensity of adjacent
similar uses.
e. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the
vicinity in which the project is located. The scale and operation of the use is similar to adjacent
uses and will not negatively impact the normal operations of any of these surrounding uses. The
proposed use has been conditioned to meet performance criteria, safety standards, maintenance
and Facilities (FC/UC)
West Industrial Neo Industrial
Employment District Neo Industrial (NI)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-25
DRC2023-00226 CAL MICRO RECYCLING, LLC
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 3
standards and all other Municipal Code standards to mitigate any potential impact related to the
recycling and processing facility.
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including
police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current
level of service due to the use. The use does not pose any undue burdens in that it will occupy
an existing tenant space which will not require additional service from streets and utilities. The
use does not authorize any operations which may result in additional service requests from Fire
or Police that are not normally associated with similar adjacent existing uses.
4. The Planning and Economic Development Department staff has determined that
the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section
15301 - Existing Facilities Projects which includes leasing of existing private structures and
facilities. The Conditional Use Permit will authorize the use of a recycling and processing facility
within an existing structure.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neo-Industrial
Employment District and Neo-Industrial zone, respectively, which permits the operation of a
recycling and processing facility of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with
the City’s development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage,
and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits and is surrounded by
existing industrial development and City infrastructure.
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning and Economic Development Department’s
determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgement, concurs in the staff
determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bryan Dopp, Chair
ATTEST:
Matt Marquez, Secretary
I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23-25
DRC2023-00226 CAL MICRO RECYCLING, LLC
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Page 4
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 2023, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2023-00226
Project Name: Mat Recyclers
Location: 9669 HERMOSA AVE - 021037109-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The Conditional Use Permit authorizes a mattress recycling and processing facility within an existing
58,543 square foot industrial building within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, located east of Hermosa
Avenue and north of 4th Street at 9669 Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0210-371-09.
1.
The Conditional Use Permit does not authorize outdoor storage of mattresses.2.
The business operator shall maintain that gate access be made available during all hours of operation
to accommodate for on-site truck access and parking.
3.
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 10/17/2023
Exhibit C
Project #: DRC2023-00226
Project Name: Mat Recyclers
Location: 9669 HERMOSA AVE - 021037109-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
4.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
5.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
6.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 4Printed: 10/17/2023
Project #: DRC2023-00226
Project Name: Mat Recyclers
Location: 9669 HERMOSA AVE - 021037109-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
8.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
9.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code.
10.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
11.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
12.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Locking and latching hardware for access doors is required to be operable from the exterior of the
building and is required to be single action latch/lock release on the interior of the building.
1.
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
2.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
4.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 4Printed: 10/17/2023
Project #: DRC2023-00226
Project Name: Mat Recyclers
Location: 9669 HERMOSA AVE - 021037109-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Storage of certain combustible commodities and /or business supplies in excess of threshold amounts
requires a permit from the Fire District. The storage of combustible materials in excess of 2,500 cubic
feet requires an operational permit to be issued by the Fire District. This permit will be issued after
occupancy of the building.
6.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
It is mutually agreed that the business will not store combustible materials in a high -piled arrangement. If
business operations change and high -piled combustible storage is needed, a high -piled combustible
storage analysis is required to be submitted and approved prior to storing materials above six feet in
height.
7.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
8.
One or more of the operations in use or proposed for this building /business requires a Fire Code
Operating Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The
storage of combustible materials in excess of 2,500 cubic feet requires an operational permit to be
issued by the Fire District. This permit will be issued after occupancy of the building.
9.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
10.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
11.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
12.
The most current versions of the Fire District's Standards can be found at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/86zjfacfxqh8oeo/AABYEQ81w5vL7WZ7e1zBiu25a?dl=0
13.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 4Printed: 10/17/2023