HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-05-22 - Agenda Packet
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
May 22, 2024
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Chairman Morales
Vice Chairman Boling
Commissioner Dopp
Commissioner Daniels
Commissioner Diaz
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Commission (“Planning
Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the
Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included
on the agenda, but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 8, 2024.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D1. DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – ELECTRIC PICKLE - A request to construct a
12,074 square-foot building for a restaurant/bar with full alcohol service (Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control Type 47 license); a 1,770 square-foot building with a coffee bar, restrooms, and
storage; and outdoor recreational courts within the mixed use placetype of The Resort Specific Plan,
located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Resort Parkway - APN: 0210-102-07. This item is
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA
Section 15162 (Design Review DRC2023-00248, Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00151).
E. GENERAL BUSINESS
E1. Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Major Projects Program for Fiscal Year 2024/25.
F. DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
H. ADJOURNMENT
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,
given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may
present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience
should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing
impaired.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After
speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your
name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited
to 3 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.”
As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed
to the Commissioners and included in the record.
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s
Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,526 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established
and governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session.
I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted Seventy-Two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California
and on the City's website.
HPC/PC MINUTES – May 8, 2024
Page 1 of 2
Draft
2
8
3
1
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission Agenda
May 8, 2024
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular Joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on May 8,
2024. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Daniels and
Commissioner Diaz. Absent: Vice Chairman Boling.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning; Jason
Welday, Director of Engineering; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Jason Knight, Assistant Planner;
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chairman Morales opened the public communications.
With no comments, Chairman Morales closed the public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 24, 2024.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Commissioner Dopp, to approve Minutes as presented.
Motion carried 4-0-1, with Vice Chairman Boling absent.
D. Public Hearings
D1. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA – A request to re-subdivide the properties
commonly known as Central Park, consisting of approximately 103 acres, from the current 11 parcels into 12 parcels
consistent with the Central Park Master Plan Phasing Map. APNs: 1076-591-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, -06, -07, -08, -
09, -10, and -11. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) on April 7, 2021 for the Central Park Master Plan. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,
no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same
project (SUBTT20680).
Assistant Planner Jared Knight presented a PowerPoint presentation. (Copy of file)
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
Page 3
HPC/PC MINUTES – May 8, 2024
Page 2 of 2
Draft
2
8
3
1
Resident Ernest Reguero asked when will the rest of Central Park be developed.
Deputy Director of Planning Jennifer Nakamura responded that we are looking for available state funding to
continue to build out those phases. She explained that we received a state grant to develop the Dog Park and
will continue to pursue those opportunities to phase out the remaining parcels of Central Park.
With no other comments, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Daniels expressed that staff outlined the reasons for this map very well.
Commissioner Dopp concurred with Daniels and said that there is a great vision and strategy to move things
along.
Commissioner Diaz concurred with fellow Commissioners and stated it is nice to have a plan and be ready for
grant funding.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Daniels; seconded by Commissioner Diaz. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Vice
Chairman Boling absent.
D2. DESIGN REVIEW – FOOTHILL LOFTS, LLC – A request to construct a mixed-use development comprising
385 residential units and approximately 6,216 square feet of commercial lease area on approximately 8.41 acres of
land at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Elm Avenue. The project area has a General Plan land use
designation of City Corridor – High. APN: 0208-961-05, -06, and -07 (DRC2022-00162).
Principal Planner Sean McPherson requested this item be continued to July 24, 2024, due to receiving a written
request from the applicant.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
With no comments, Chairman Morales stated this item will remain open to July 24, 2024, meeting.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to continue the item to July 24th
HPC/PC meeting. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Vice Chairman Boling absent.
E. General Business – None
F. Director Announcements – None
G. Commission Announcements - None
H. Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp, seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adjoin the meeting. Hearing no
objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning and Economic Development Department
Approved:
Page 4
DATE:May 22, 2024
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development
INITIATED BY:Bond Mendez, CPD, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – ELECTRIC PICKLE - A request
to construct a 12,074 square-foot building for a restaurant/bar with full alcohol service
(Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 47 license); a 1,770 square-foot
building with a coffee bar, restrooms, and storage; and outdoor recreational courts within
the mixed use placetype of The Resort Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of
4th Street and Resort Parkway - APN: 0210-102-07. This item is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section
15162 (Design Review DRC2023-00248, Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00151).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution approving the Design Review and
Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of the proposed restaurant/bar/recreational use.
BACKGROUND:
The 2.68-acre vacant lot is located at the southernmost portion of the Resort Specific Plan Planning Area 1A
(PA1A). The location of the project site is within area S-19, which is designated as the Mixed-Use (MU)
Placetype. The project site has dimensions of approximately 331 feet (east to west) and 340 feet (north to south).
The remainder of the Resort is developed with condominiums along the east side of The Resort Parkway and is
developed with the Homecoming apartment buildings and amenities along the west side of The Resort Parkway
(see Figure 1 on next page).
Within PA1A is a required minimum non-residential floor area of 20,000 square feet. The addition of the 13,844
square-foot project contributes to the required minimum and is in addition to the existing 5,000 square-foot non-
residential floor area located west of roundabout along Resort Parkway. There is also a vacant parcel at the
north end of PA1A on the southwest corner of 6th Street and Resort Parkway to be developed with non-residential
floor area.
Page 5
Page 2 of 7
2
3
5
1
Figure 1: Location of subject property on northwest corner of 4th Street and Resort Parkway.
Aerial View
Page 6
Page 3 of 7
2
3
5
1
The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are
as follows:
Table 1 – Land Use Information
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Urban Neighborhood The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
North Multi-Family
Residential Urban Neighborhood The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
South City of Ontario Urban Commercial Ontario Center Specific Plan
East Multi-Family
Residential Urban Neighborhood The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
West Office/Business Park 21st Century
Employment Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes to construct two commercial buildings totaling 13,844 square feet and 11 outdoor
recreation courts. Building 1 measures 12,074 square feet and is located in the center of the site. Building 2
measures 1,770 square feet and is located at the southeast corner of the site. The larger building is the primary
structure proposed to include a restaurant, bar, and outdoor dining. It also includes a small retail “pro shop” and
indoor golfing range simulation for recreation. Full alcohol service (Type 47 license) will be provided from the
restaurant and bar with hours of operation from 11:00 am – 11:00 pm for the restaurant and bar in the primary
building.
The secondary building on the corner is a coffee bar that will have limited operating hours from 6:00 am – 11:00
am and will feature a walk-up window that faces the public right-of-way on the corner of 4th Street and Resort
Parkway. The coffee bar will also provide service to those using the recreational pickleball courts.
Use of recreational courts will be accessed by a separate controlled entry for those with a membership and can
be accessed outside of the restaurant hours of operation. During the restaurant hours the facilities will also be
accessible to guests. The site includes nine (9) pickle-ball courts, two (2) bocce courts, and an open lawn space
for general leisure. The site will be accessed via a single driveway from Resort Parkway.
Page 7
Page 4 of 7
2
3
5
1
Figure 2: Site Plan.
Design Review:
The Development Code currently requires a Major Design Review (DR) for new single or multiple building
construction, on a vacant property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined) floor area of
10,001 square feet or greater pursuant to section 17.20.040.B.2. Thus, as the applicant is proposing to construct
two new buildings that exceed 10,001 square feet, a Major Design Review is required.
The Specific Plan permits different architectural themes throughout The Resort. The proposed buildings will have
an industrial architectural style including standing seam metal paneling painted with a palette of two colors
including dark bronze and slate gray. The buildings will include Hardie siding panels in an evening blue color
finish, and Indiana limestone veneer accents at various locations. Other than the south elevations for both
buildings, which include the outdoor dining on the primary building and walk-up window on the secondary
building, there is limited articulation designed throughout the wall planes in order to maximize the efficiency of
the interior space and accommodate the back-of-house uses. However, this limited articulation does not result
in an overwhelming building mass, as trellis projections aide in breaking up the building façades. Additionally,
the application of glass panels along the building’s rear elevations, which is mostly visible from the parking lot
and property to the north, adds architectural interest to the wall planes.
The conceptual signage within the plans is not part of the review and will be subject to a separate application
Page 8
Page 5 of 7
2
3
5
1
and review by staff.
Vehicle access occurs via a single driveway from The Resort Parkway and there are also pedestrian access
paths from the Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP) offices to the west and the Homecoming Apartments to the
north. A 6-foot-high tubular steel fence with block pilasters is proposed along the north, west, and south property
line. Additionally, a combination of a 6-foot high block wall and a 6-foot high tubular steel fence is proposed along
the east property line, separating the project site from the public right-of-way along Resort Parkway and the
interior portion of the site where the recreational courts and open lawn are located.
Landscaping is generally distributed along the project’s 4th Street frontage, along the west property line, and
distributed throughout the parking lot. There is additional landscaping including trees and a lawn area within the
interior/central portion of the site. The project will be conditioned to incorporate tiered landscaping along the
street frontages in compliance with the Resort Specific Plan.
Table 2 – Development Standards
Design Review Committee:
The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Boling and Daniels) on March 19, 2024. The
Committee discussed design elements including walls and fencing, building elevation articulation, and shade
structures over the recreational courtside seating areas. The committee recommended that the project move
forward with the walls and fencing as proposed, the building articulation as proposed, and to incorporate shade
structures as proposed. The DRC was pleased with the project and recommended to move forward to Planning
Commission for review and approval.
Following the DRC meeting on March 19th, the applicant proposed a revised design to the project. The revised
design is a result of a model that better suits the engineering of the primary building. The revised project was
presented at a second DRC meeting on May 7th, 2024, on the consent calendar. The design change includes
relocating the second floor to the ground floor to create a single-story building. The overall floor area of the
building is reduced but the revised floor plan does not result in new uses within the building or on the site. The
architecture has also been updated. The impact to the site is the loss of one pickleball court but the remaining
site layout remains the same for the outdoor space, parking, and landscaping. The structure is consistent with
the Resort South Specific Plan development requirements. The secondary building on the corner of Resort
Parkway and 4th Street also remains in place.
Development Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height Max. 60’30’YES
Floor Area Max 35,000 13,845 YES
Resort Parkway ROW Min. 5’5’YES
4th Street ROW Min. 10’10’YES
PA1A Boundary Setback from Cleveland Avenue Min. 10’10’YES
Setback from Interior Property Line 0’134’YES
Page 9
Page 6 of 7
2
3
5
1
Parking:
Pursuant to the Specific Plan, non-residential development is subject to the minimum parking requirements set
forth within the Development Code. Per Section 17.64 Parking and Loading Standards, table 17.64.050-1,
required minimum parking for the project is 10 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of restaurant use. The
Development Code allows for floor areas to be deducted from the gross square footage for parking requirement
calculations. The floor area deducted includes areas such as hallways, storage of materials and equipment,
automated equipment related to operations, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, elevators, bathrooms, employee
only rooms, etc. Based on these calculations, building 1 will require 99 parking stalls and building 2 will require
9 parking stalls. Therefore, the project will require a total of 108 vehicle parking stalls. The project provides 139
stalls, exceeding the parking requirement. The following table breaks down the parking calculation:
Table 3 – Parking Analysis
Conditional Use Permit:
The Development Code currently requires a Conditional Use Permit for specific uses within the Mixed-Use
Placetype including Restaurants with Full Liquor Service and Outdoor Commercial Recreation uses pursuant to
Table 17.38.060-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Placetype) and 17.32.020(C)(11) (Allowed
Use descriptions: Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses) and
17.32.020.(F)(18)(c) (Allowed Use descriptions: Retail and Restaurant uses). Thus, as the applicant is proposing
to operate a full-service restaurant and outdoor pickleball and bocce ball, a CUP is required. The operations for
the full alcohol service and the recreational courts were provided in the Project Description section of the staff
report. The Resort Specific Plan does not have regulations for outdoor recreational courts or on-site alcohol
consumption. The project is conditioned to obtain the required license with the California Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC) for the Type 47 license request. Planning Division staff has determined that the
proposed uses would not impact public safety or welfare and appropriate conditions of approval have been
included similar to other establishments with full alcohol service and/or outdoor commercial recreation.
Public Art:
Pursuant to the Development Code Chapter 17.124 – Design Provisions for Public Art, projects of this nature
are subject to the City’s public art ordinance and are required to provide public art on the project site with a
minimum value of one dollar per square foot. However, as part of the development of The Resort, Lewis,
assumed responsibility for the design, installation and maintenance of all public art within The Resort Specific
Plan. No additional public art will be required for this project.
CEQA Determination:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) (SCH No. 2015041083) on May 18, 2016, in connection with the City’s approval of General Plan
Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment
DRC2015-00115 for the development of The Resort. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no
Building Gross
Square Feet
Deducted
Square Feet
Adjusted Square
Feet
# of
Spaces
Required
Restaurant / Bar 12,074 2223 9,851 99
Coffee / Breakfast
Bar 1,770 859 911 9
Total 10,762 108
Page 10
Page 7 of 7
2
3
5
1
subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same
project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, Environmental Technical Analysis
Memorandum dated May 9, 2024, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit B). Staff evaluated this memorandum
and concluded that the project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the
Final EIR identified above and no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City’s
consideration of Design Review DRC2023-00248 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00151. Substantial
changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new
or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed
the effects of the proposed project. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional
or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than
significant.
Correspondence:
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to 136 property owners within a 660-foot radius
of the project site on May 8, 2024. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the
Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill
development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding
neighborhood. The overall project to redevelop what was the Empire Lakes golf course fulfills a current City
Council goal of creating villages or development districts to revitalize underperforming or underutilized areas and
creates synergy amongst the varying land uses. Upon completion, the overall project (The Resort) will provide
housing, offices and commercial land uses that will serve the existing land uses in the surrounding area and
wider community.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Project Plans
Exhibit B – Environmental Analysis
Exhibit C – Design Review Committee Minutes (March 19, 2024)
Exhibit D – PC Resolution 24-16 Design Review DRC2023-00248 with Conditions of Approval
Exhibit E – PC Resolution 24-17 Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00151 with Conditions of Approval
Page 11
SITE PLAN SPECIFICATIONNOTES 6,7(ꢀ3/$1ꢀ.(<127(6
SHEETG100 REFERTOSHEETG630 FORSITE FINISHES (XX)1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SERVICE YARDENCLOSURE (MASONRYWALLS)
01.01 Designated loading zone with signage (10.02) to keep clear during
receieving and service hours.
PARKINGLOTLIGHTING(SEE SHEETG800)
BACKYARDBOCCE COURT
PICKLE BALLCOURT
04.02 (E)03.04 CO1 Concrete sidewalk(see CivilDrawings). Integralcolor concrete
SIKA'Smoke' or Lanon Stone' with top casst 15 finish (See Landscape).
Trowelfinish. Concrete sealer.04.02 (E)04.03 05.17 COVEREDCABANA
31.01 331'-3.3"03.05 Align sawcut Controljoints 1"deep minimumfor 4"slabs and at building,
planing area, and wallcorners in allconcrete flatwork. Minimumjoint
spacing: 8 Feet.
COVEREDOUTDOORBAR
RESTROOMS / STORAGE BUILDING
OUTDOODRSEATINGAREA
COVEREDPERGOLA/ENTRY
03.07 Concrete 'Apron' slab as shown (see Civil)04.02 31.01 03.08 Stamped integralcolor concrete - 'flagstone look' GCto provide mock-up
for approvalbyBrick&West prior to execution.12 7 12
10 GATES
03.09 Grayconcrete slab (see Civildrawings for additionalinformation) finish to
match concrete workat site (drivewayaprons)11 DECORATIVE SITE FENCE (8'-0"H.) (SEE ELEVATIONS)
12 LINE OF OPEN_AIRSHADE STRUCTURE ABOVE (SEE ELEVATIONS)8 24 26.05 03.10 ADAramp (maximumslope 1:12). See Civilfor grades.31.01 31.01 31.01 13
14 FIRE PITSEATINGAREA
SYNTHETICTURF
LOT
116,728 SF
2.68 AC.
7 03.11 CIP concrete water feature. See details. See plumbing for water and
drainage information.
03.12 (AK) CIP concrete wall(see elevations)
03.13 (AK) CIP Feature wall(see details)
15
16
17
18
19
COVERED'FRONTPORCH'
31.01 31.01 31.01 31.01 7 TRASHENCLOSURE (MASONRY/SOLIDGATES)
CONCRETE APRON/ PAVEMENT
CONSULTANTS:
03.14 (AK) CIP stepped seating wall. See details. See electiraland lighting
plans for step light specifications. 3/A50426.02 26.02 26.02 SES / ELECTRICALSERVICE1612183603.16 Raised concrete stage (see Civil). See details.
03.18 Concrete ramp 1:12 max. slope. See details
CONT. TRENCHDRAINWITHSAND/OILINTERCEPTOR
20 GREASE INTERCEPTOR
21 STAGE
P3 @ 20'P3 @20'P3 @ 20'03.19 CIP concrete fireplace. See site details. See plumbing for gas
information.03.04
05.16
31.01
03.04
04.02 CMU(Masonry) perimiter wallat multi-familyparcelto the north.22 OUTDOORLOUNGE AREA
23 PROPERTYLINE24
31.01 04.03 CMU(Masonry) pilaster to match multi-familyparcelto the north. See
8/A503 24 FLUSHPAVEMENT/ PEDCROSSING
26 CENTERLINE ATROW CERTIFICATION:17 24
19
139 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 05.08 Steel'picket' fence (see design intent drawings). 3/A50342'-6"
01.01 03.07
1 24 05.09 Steelviewfence (see design intent drawings). Coordinate with retaning
walls and gates. 5/A503. Painted PT-02 per specifications.28 ATGRADE LANDSCAPE AREA(SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS)
04.03 01.01 9 31.01 PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
29 FIRE RISERROOM/ FDC2905.10 Decorative steelEXITgate. See door schedule and notes. Painted PT-02
per specifications.39 30 TRELLIS OVERHANG(SEE ELEVATIONS)
31 EXISTINGSIDEWALK, CURB, ANDGUTTERTOREMAIN
35 BICYCLE PARKING
30 10'-0"16 05.11 Steeltrellis (see structural) painted PT-02 per speficicatons.10.02 10.02 10.02 10.02 10.02 18 CONSTRUCTION1203.04 03.08 11 03.04 24 05.13 Decorative tubular steelperimiter fence to match mult-familyparcelto
north see 1/A50321.01 08.12 31.01 31.01 36 NEWFIRE HYDRANT
05.14 Tubular steelgate at perimeter fence see to match 05.13 (byfence mfr.)118'-8" TO F.O.C.39 WATERFEATURE - SEE DETAILS
05.15 Metalfence at building entrylocations (Electric Pickle standard) see
5/A5032410'-8"
05.16
03.10 03.04 PARKING SUMMARY (17.64):05.10 05.11 03.10 05.16 Metalgate at building entrylocations (Electric Pickle standard see
5.1/A503
107 REQUIRED (10,651 @ 10/1000 SF)
139 VEHICLE SPACES PROVIDED
5% BICYCLE PARKING 7 REQUIRED 9 PROVIDED
5% EV CAPABLE PARKING 7 REQUIRED 7 PROVIDED
ADA SPACES REQUIRED
TRASH/
GREASE 22.03
10
10'-0"
20 03.19 05.17 Decorative steelfence see 3/A503
21.02 26.04 03.13 11 08.12 Steeldoors at electricalcabinet. See door schedule. PT-02 per
specifications.
32.02 22.0145'-4"101-150 SPACES = 5 REQ'D
6 PROVIDED94'-8" TO P.L.10.02 NOPARKINGBETWEEN5AM-11AM' sign mounted on steelgates at
enclosure wall.MAIN BUILDING
ONE STORY (12,074.5 GSF FOOTPRINT)
03.08 35 MAINBUILDING21.01 F.D.C.
USE AREA(SF)21.02 Fire Riser32.03 INTERIORDINING
SES/RISER
3,37505.15 26.03 26.03 22.01 Continuous trench drain tied to sand-oilinterceptor. GCto coordinate
finalelevation with concrete pour to ensure proper sheet flowto drain.05.08 188.5
2,9511531.01 22.02 Grease interceptor (see plumbing)OUTDOORDINING
KITCHEN/BOHS1@20'4 S1 @ 20'03.19 03.08 6'-0"05.09 28 22.03 Water feature (design-build) - see Plumbing drawings.
22.04 Gas plumbing to fire feature. See plumbing drawings
1,899.5
107'-7" TO P.L.
05.13 26.02 26.02 SERVER 134.5
31903.08 P1 @ 20'P1 @ 20'26.02 Site / parking lot lighting pole. See architecturaldetails for base
dimensions and details. 4/A502
WALK-INFRIDGE
WALK-INFRZ
31.01
32.04
31.01 31.01
92.5
18803.04 26.03 Pickleballcourt lighting (pole mounted). See electricaland lighting plans
and specifications for details. Coordinate shielding to elminate light
trespass beyond edge ofcourt.
KEGCOOLER32.10 32.09
03.13
121'-5" TO F.O.C.LIQUORSTORAGE
DRYSTORAGE
AVIT-AROOM
181.5
204
31.01 3 32.08 26.04 Service EntrySection (SES) / ElectricalGear (See electrical)
26.05 (E) Electricaltransformer
31.01 1314 21 110
31.01 Art-grade planting area (turn-down edge fromflatwork). See landscape
plans for planting and irrigation requirements. See electricaland lighting
plans for landscape lighting information.
STORAGE CLOSETS 169
22 RETAIL/PROSHOP 228
03.16
32.11 22.04 03.14
32.05
8 31.02 Elevated/curbed planting area. See landscape drawings for planting and
irrigation specifications. See electricaland lighting plans for landscape
lighting information.
HOST 154
13 11
32.06 BAR 573832.07 8 12 RESTROOMS
STAIR
682810'-5"05.10 26 32.01 Heavy-dutyparking block(tupicalas shown on site plan). Centered on
parking stall.32.11 32.05 32.05 89
32.06 31.01 5 32.02 A-Safe 'I-Flex' Bollard anchored per allmanufacturer's specifications and
requiements.
GOLF SIMULATOR 536
52'-8"11'-8"TOTALAREA 12074.5
985132.03 Bicycle Racks (see site furnishings schedule). Installper all
manufacturer's speficiations and instructions. 6/A50231.01 12 PARKINGAREA
48'-5"
32.04 (AE) Stablizied compacted decomposed granite paving.CABANABUILDING03.14 6 32.05 18"deep hedge min 42"height. See landscape drawings for planting and
irrigation specifications. See electricaland lighting plans for landscape
lighting information.
USE (NOCHANGE TOTHIS BLDG.)AREA(SF)
32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 BAR 400
31931.01
03.04
COFFEE32.06 Planting and planter within CIP concrete wall. See landscape drawings
for planting and irrigation specifications. See electricaland lighting plans
for landscape lighting information.
26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 26.03 SERVICE/BEVERAGE
DRYSTORAGE
WATERTREATMENT
WALKIN
191.5
29805.10
7
10 32.07 Fire feature as specificed. Coordinate finalloation and gas routing with
plumbing drawings.64
16'-3"
TO F.O.C.S1 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S2 @ 20'4 S1@ 20'10632.08 (AF) Synthetic lawn as specificed. See site finish schedule. See also civil
for graing, drainage, and substrate information.CABANA BUILDING
1-STORY
1,765 GSF
RESTROOMS
RISERROOM
TOTALAREA
PARKINGAREA
315
32.09 Raised planter clad in steel. See site details. See landscape drawings for
planting and irrigation specifications. See electricaland lighting plans for
landscape lighting information.
7705.13 32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 1770.5
91132.1 PickleballCourt. see plans and specifications fromcourt subcontractor
Revision Date32.11 Bocce BallCourt - see plans and specifications fromcourt subcontractor.
Edge details and lighting per archietcturaland electrical.OVERALLPROJECT
TOTALAREA
5'-0"
13845
23 PARKINGAREA 1076204.03 05.17 05.17
04.03288'-11.3"
11 114TH STREET
20'-0"
NORTH G100
1 OVERALL SITE PLAN
1"=20'-0"SITEPLAN
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
EXHIBIT A
Page 12
04.02 (E)
04.02 (E)
05.13
04.03 04.03 05.13 04.03 05.13
05.14
CONSULTANTS:04.03
P3 @ 20'P3 @20'P3 @ 20'
05.16
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
03.12 03.12
05.19
05.19
05.19
03.12
05.16
05.15
05.15
05.17
S1 @20'S1 @ 20'
05.13
P1 @ 20'P1 @ 20'
03.12
04.03 05.16
03.12
03.12
05.16
05.17
SITE PLAN SPECIFICATIONNOTES
SHEETG101 REFERTOSHEETG630 FORSITE FINISHES (XX)
03.12 (AK) CIP concrete wall(see elevations)
05.18 04.02 CMU(Masonry) perimiter wall(Existing not a part) at multi-familyparcel
to the north.
04.03
05.13
04.03 CMU(Masonry) pilaster to match multi-familyparcelto the north. See
8/A503S1@20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S1 @ 20'
05.13 Decorative tubular steelperimiter fence to match mult-familyparcelto
north see 1/A503
05.14 Tubular steelgate at perimeter fence see to match 05.13 (byfence mfr.)
05.15 Metalfence at building entrylocations (Electric Pickle standard) see
5/A503 Revision Date05.16 Metalgate at building entrylocations (Electric Pickle standard see
5.1/A503
05.17 Decorative steelfence see 3/A503
04.03 05.13 05.13
04.03 05.18 Decorative steelgate see 4/A503
05.19 Solid steel(opaque) gate(s) on heavy-dutyhinges painted PT-02
NORTH G101
1 PERIMETER FENCE PLAN
1"=20'-0"PERIMETERFENCEPLAN
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 13
General design, construction, and maintenance of fire apparatus access roads.
a. The design and construction materials of fire apparatus access roads are required to be submitted with site plans and
are required to be approved prior to installation.
b. When conditions or circumstances warrant, the fire code official is authorized to require more than one fire apparatus
access road and/or additional access points to a fire access road.
c. Fire apparatus access roads are required to be all-weather, hard-surfaced (asphalt or concrete) and continuously
maintained. Permanent fire apparatus access roads utilizing surface material other than concrete or asphalt are required
to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-2 and approved by the fire code official.
d. Fire apparatus access roads are required to have an unobstructed width of not less than 26 feet. Widths are to be
measured from curb face to curb face, from flowline to flowline where rolled curbs are installed, or from the edges of
drivable surfaces capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus where curbs are not provided.
Exceptions:
1. Sections of access roads at entry medians constructed for private commercial, industrial, or residential developments
are required to be a minimum of 20 feet on each side. The 20-foot section cannot be a part of a radius turn. This
exception does not apply to public streets.
2. Dimensions may be reduced when in the opinion of the fire code official there are practical difficulties with providing
the required dimensions.
3. Dimensions may be increased when in the opinion of the fire code official required dimensions are not adequate to
provide fire apparatus access or when dimensions are not adequate to concurrently provide fire apparatus access
and evacuation.
e. Fire apparatus access roads are required to have a minimum of 14 feet 6 inches of unobstructed vertical clearance.
Exception: Overhead and/or vertical obstructions are not allowed within an aerial fire apparatus access road. See
Section 3 of this Standard.
CONSULTANTS:
f. Fire apparatus access roads are required to be designed to withstand 80,000 pounds of gross vehicle weight and
surfaced to provide all-weather driving capabilities. When required by the fire code official, a report stamped and signed
by a registered engineer in the State of California certifying the design of the fire apparatus access road shall be
provided when plans are submitted for review and approval.P3 @ 20'P3 @20'P3 @ 20'
g. Fire apparatus access roads are required to be continuously maintained and remain unobstructed during construction.
Refer to Fire District Standard 33-1 for fire apparatus access road requirements prior to and during construction. Refer
to Fire District Standard 33-2 for temporary fire apparatus access roads.
h. Fire apparatus access roads where fire hydrants are installed are required to be designed and constructed to
accommodate the full flow of the hydrants under testing conditions without damaging the road.CERTIFICATION:NEWHYDRANT i.Dips, humps, traffic calming devices, or other surface irregularities are prohibited from being installed without prior
approval of the fire code official. When approved, traffic calming devices are required to be designed and installed in a
manner that allows for clear, unobstructed passage by emergency vehicles. See Appendix D.
FIRE LANE WITH
SIGNS AND
RED CURBS
FIRE LANE WITH
SIGNS AND
26'-0"
FDC RED CURBS Note: Traffic calming is required to be primarily accomplished by the use of a speed cushion concept and design.
Information on this concept, design, and manufactured products is available online. Speed cushions constructed of
concrete or asphalt that utilize a design similar to manufactured products can also be submitted for review. Submit plans
and specifications for review prior to installing any traffic calming device or measure.
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
j.The maximum grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 12%.CONSTRUCTION
k. The maximum cross grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 5%.
l. The minimum outside turning radius shall be 46 feet and the minimum inside radius shall be 20 feet.
m. Grade breaks in a fire apparatus access road shall not be greater than 9° or 20% on either side of the break.
n. Fire apparatus access road dead-ends in excess of 150 feet are required to be provided with an approved means to turn
around such as an approved cul-de-sac, bulb, or hammerhead. See Appendix C for details.
FIRE LANE WITH
SIGNS AND
RED CURBS26'-0"
o. Turf Block and similar concrete sub-systems are prohibited from being used in the construction of a fire apparatus
access road. Porous and/or pervious systems can be considered in limited applications for portions of a fire apparatus
access road. Such systems are required to be specifically approved by the fire code official prior to installation and are
required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-2.
p. Gates installed across a fire apparatus access road are required to be approved by the fire code official and are required
to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-3 and Standard 5-4.
FIRERISER
q. Removable bollards installed to limit access to fire apparatus access roads that are designated as emergency vehicle
access only shall not exceed 40 pounds and are required to be approved by the fire code official prior to installation.
MAIN BUILDING
SEE FLOOR PLAN SHEETS Identification of fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads are required to be identified by at least one of the
following methods. The fire code official may require additional means of identification as necessary to adequately identify
access roads.
a. Curb painting.
i. The curb adjoining a fire apparatus access road is painted red. The words “FIRE LANE-NO PARKING” shall be clearly
stenciled on the top and face of the curb at intervals not exceeding 30 feet. The letters shall be white, 3 ½ inches high,
and ½ inch stroke.
S1 @20'S1 @ 20'
P1 @ 20'P1 @ 20'ii. Every section of curb more than 4 feet in length that adjoins the fire apparatus access road must be painted red; all
curbs exceeding 8 feet shall be painted red and stenciled.
b. Signage.
i. Signs are posted immediately adjacent to, visible from, and along the entire length of the fire apparatus access road. The
sign shall read, “FIRE LANE-NO PARKING” and shall be a minimum of 12 inches in horizontal width and 18 inches in
vertical length.
150'-0" HOSE PULL DISTANCE
ii. The signs are required to be installed facing the direction of travel at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. The spacing may
be reduced at the discretion of the fire code official.
iii. The signs are installed 2 feet inside the curb line or edge of pavement. Signs may be required to be installed on walls,
fences, gates, or other structures in order to adequately identify the fire apparatus access road.
iv. Where the entire roadway width is designated as a fire apparatus access road, signs are required to be posted on both
sides. The sign spacing cannot exceed 100 feet between any two signs on the same side of the roadway.
v. Where all drive aisles within a planned residential community or a commercial development are designated fire
apparatus access roads, a single sign may be posted at each entry point indicating that all drive aisles are fire lanes
and that parking in any drive aisle is prohibited. See Appendix A for samples of this sign.
vi. All fire lane signs are required to be reflective.
vii. Signs shall be replaced when the wording and/or reflective quality is diminished.
viii. All fire lane signs shall be installed at heights above the ground that conform to the California Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices or equivalent recognized standard.
c. Pavement marking.
i. The roadway is painted with 5-inch red stripes to designate the 26-foot wide dimension of the fire apparatus access road.
The words “FIRE LANE” shall be stenciled at each end of the fire apparatus access road. The letters shall be white, 2
feet in height with a 3-inch stroke.
ii. Where the fire apparatus access road exceeds 150 feet but is less than 300 feet, the words “FIRE LANE” are required to
be stenciled at both ends of the fire apparatus access road and at least once at the midway point.
iii. Where the fire apparatus access road exceeds 300 feet, the words “FIRE LANE” are required to be stenciled at both
ends of the fire apparatus access road and at intervals of 150 feet or less with the stenciling equally distributed
throughout the fire apparatus access road.
S1 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S2 @ 20'S1 @ 20'
CABANA BUILDING
SEE FLOOR PLAN SHEETS
150'-0" HOSE PULL DISTANCE
Revision Date
FIRERISER
FDC
NORTH G102
1 FIRE ACCESS SITE PLAN
1"=20'-0"FIREACCESS
SITEPLAN*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 14
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.5
0.8
1.2
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.8
0.9
1.3
1.7
2.0
2.2
2.8
3.1
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.6
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.3
2.8
3.0
2.5
3.1
2.7
2.4
2.2
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.6
2.0
2.4
2.9
1.1
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.4
2.9
3.3
2.7
2.4
2.2
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.6
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.7
2.8
2.6
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.3
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.5
2.8
2.9
2.7
2.4
2.1
2.0
1.7
1.2
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.3
2.1
1.8
1.3
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.3
2.1
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.7
2.9
2.6
2.4
2.1
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.7
2.9
2.6
2.2
2.1
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.1
1.5
2.0
2.2
2.5
2.9
3.1
2.7
2.4
2.2
1.8
1.4
0.9
1.0
1.6
2.0
2.4
2.9
3.3
2.9
3.2
2.7
2.3
1.9
1.4
0.9
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.3
2.7
1.1
1.5
1.8
2.1
2.3
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.3
0.9
1.1
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.6
2.7
2.4
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.5
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.2
1.4
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.5
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.6
2.7
2.5
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.4
2.8
3.1
2.6
2.4
2.2
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.4
2.9
3.2
2.8
3.2
2.8
2.4
2.1
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.8
2.4
2.7
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.8
2.6
2.1
1.9
0.9
1.5
1.9
2.3
2.8
0.9
1.3
1.7
2.0
2.2
2.7
3.0
2.5
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.7
2.2
2.7
3.2
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.2
2.8
2.4
1.7
0.8
1.2
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.7
2.2
2.7
3.1
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.2
2.8
2.2
1.7
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.1
2.5
2.0
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.3
2.8
3.1
3.0
2.3
2.2
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
CONSULTANTS:
3.2 2.9 3.0
P3 @2.620'P3 @ 20'2.7 P3@ 220.'6
Schedule
Symbol Label
BB
QTY
4
Manufacturer
KELVIX
Catalog Description Lamp Output
17
LLF O
T
u
otptault Input Power
228.0001SW3HO-60'-30K-VR-X-IP68 SIGNWAVE SERIES DIRECT VIEW HIGH OUTPUT IP68 RATED TAPE LIGHT
RECESSED INTO SIDE OF BOCCE BALL COURT WALL
0.91 19802
3.2
2.7
2.4
2.1
1.7
1.4
2.9
2.6
2.2
1.8
1.4
0.9
3.0
2.7
2.4
2.1
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.6
2.1
2.6
3.1
3.6
3.7
3.7
3.2
2.8
2.3
1.8
2
3
Lithonia Lighting
Lithonia Lighting
DSX1 LED P4 30K 70CRI T2M HS VOLTAGE
SPA NLTAIR2 HA FINISH
2.5' BASE
D-Series Size
Type 2 Medium Houseside Shield
1 Area Luminaire P4 Performance Package 3000K CCT 70 CRI 13195
16324
0.91
0.91
13195 123.9373
247.88
P1
P3
/SSS 17.5' W/
DNSLTXA1IRLE2DHAP4F3IN0IKSH70/CSRSI ST 5
BASE
W7.5V'OWL/T2A.G5'E SPA
1
DTy-Speer5ieWs Sidizee1 Area Luminaire P4 Performance Package 3000K CCT 70 CRI 32648 CERTIFICATION:
S1
S2
4
8
LITHONIA
LITHONIA
DFISX
N
IS2HLE/DSSPS8 3107K.5'BWLC/
2
V.5O
'
LBT
A
A
S
G
E
E SPA HA DOSPXT2ICAMROCUHNITE
TE
C
D
U@TR2A
0
L' AFRGEA LUMINAIRE WITH BACK LIGHT CONTROL 37432
39409
0.91
0.91
37432
78817
431
686DSX2 LED P6 30K T5S VOLTAGE SPA HA
FINISH SSS 17.5' W/ 2.5' BASE
DSX2 ARCHITECUTRAL AREA LUMINAIRE WITH TYPE 5 SHORT CONTROL
OPTIC MOUNTED 20' AFG/@ PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Statistics
Description
BB
Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
1.4 2.3 2.9 3.1 2.7
4.5
1.9
3.1
1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.5
2.7
6.4
15.2
27.0
38.5
51.4 fc
0.9 fc
95.0 fc
10.3 fc
3.7 fc
4.0 fc
0.0 fc
0.6 fc
0.0 fc
22.9 fc
23.8:1
N/A
12.9:1
N/Alight trespass 100' offset from pl
PARKING FC AFG
SITE FC AFG
2.3 4.2 4.8 4.8 1.3 0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.3 0.6 2.0 fc 6.2:1
N/A
3.3:1
N/A14.8 fc
30.2 fc
95.0 fc
38.7 fc5.6 9.5 10.0
19.5
31.4
42.1
9.9 0.2 0.2 typ. PB COURT 1.7:1 1.3:1
11.3
15.1
19.7
19.7
28.3
35.4
33.6
34.4
26.1
14.5
6.8
19.6
30.7
42.1
0.1 0.2
0.1 0.2
0.1 0.3
S1 @ 20'S1@
39.5
20'S2@ 20'19.6 43.1 0.1 0.3
P1 @ 20'P1 @ 20'
19.8
14.3
8.8
37.8
26.2
14.8
7.4
37.2
25.9
14.9
7.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
3.8 7.1 5.0 2.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
BB @0.33'
1.7 6.1 7.5 7.5 6.9 5.5 4.0 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
BB
BB
@ 0.33'
1.2 94.0
54.2
6.4
94.9
55.2
7.2
95.0
54.8
6.7
94.2
53.9
5.9
93.3
53.1
5.2
92.5
52.6
4.8
@0.05.33'0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0
1.5 BB @10.0.33'0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 3.0
7.0
2.2
4.7
1.4
2.2
4.6
7.3
6.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.2
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.5
3.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.6 5.2 5.8 0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
8.3 14.7
25.5
32.3
15.4
27.2
38.2
35.2
39.8
29.7
17.4
15.8
26.7
38.1
15.7
27.5
38.9
36.7
40.6
30.1
17.9
15.0
27.6
38.6
36.0
40.2
30.2
17.6
14.9
26.5
38.1
14.7
26.7
38.6
14.4
27.4
38.1
35.4
39.5
29.9
17.0
14.7
26.4
38.3
37.8
40.6
29.2
17.1
14.7
26.5
38.4
14.4
27.4
38.1
36.3
39.4
30.0
16.9
14.6
26.5
38.5
37.3
40.6
29.3
17.1
14.6
26.3
38.0
14.3
27.0
37.9
36.3
39.4
29.8
17.0
14.5
26.7
38.3
35.3
40.1
29.5
17.1
14.6
26.2
37.7
14.5
26.8
38.4
36.0
40.1
29.6
17.1
14.4
27.0
38.2
35.6
39.7
29.7
17.1
14.7
26.4
38.0
14.9
26.9
38.7
15.2
28.0
38.6
35.9
39.9
30.4
17.7
15.6
26.9
38.7
38.3
41.1
29.5
17.8
15.7
26.7
35.4
34.2
36.1
27.9
17.7
10.4
16.6
21.3
13.6
17.7
17.8S1
S1
@
@
20' 32.3
20'43.2S2
S2
@
@
20'
20'
41.3 S2
S2
@
@
20'36.0
20'
S2
S2
@362.05'S328@.9 20'42.6S2
S2
@
@
20'
20'
41.2 S2
S2
@
@
20'36.2
20'
S2
S2
@362.09'21.1 S1S1 @
@
20' 5.2
20'@ 20'S2 @ 20'@ 20'
17.5
13.1
9.2
32.7
26.1
40.5
29.0
17.7
40.4
29.0
17.2
40.7
29.6
17.2
40.8 40.3
28.8
17.0
40.0
28.7
17.0
40.3
28.9
17.1
40.8
29.7
17.5
41.1 21.2
17.2
11.3
6.1
6.8
4.8
29.3
17.1
29.5
17.3
Revision Date
16.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.1
4.0
1.1
0.3
0.3
7.9 10.3
4.0
1.7
0.8
10.0
3.6
1.7
0.9
10.0 9.4 9.2 9.1
1.8
0.4
0.2
8.8 8.9
1.7
0.3
0.2
9.1
1.7
0.3
0.1
8.8
1.7
0.3
0.2
8.8
1.7
0.3
0.2
9.1
1.7
0.3
0.1
8.8
1.7
0.3
0.2
8.8
1.7
0.3
0.2
9.1
1.7
0.3
0.1
8.9 8.8
1.7
0.3
0.2
9.0
1.8
0.3
0.2
9.2
1.9
0.4
0.2
9.4
2.2
0.7
0.4
10.0
2.8
1.1
0.6
10.0
3.6
1.7
0.9
10.3
4.0
1.7
0.9
8.2
3.0
1.1
0.6
4.4 0.8
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
1.1
0.6
2.9
1.1
0.7
2.2
0.7
0.4
1.9
0.5
0.3
1.7
0.3
0.2
1.7
0.3
0.1
1.1
0.4
0.3
NORTH G800
1 PHOTOMETRY - SITE
1"=20'-0"PHOTOMETRY
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 15
OCCUPIED ROOF
R01
2 OCCUPIED ROOF AT MAIN BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0"NORTH
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
RISER
125
SES
124
PDR
107
LIBRARY DINING
106
KITCHEN
001
WINE CELLAR
002
GOLF SIMULATOR
203
GOLF SIMULATOR
204
DINING
104
ENTRY/HOST
101
BAR DINING
105
PRO SHOP
102
WASH ROOM
111
216 SF
MAIN BAR
103WEST DINING
202
WEST BAR
203
STAIR
01
ENTRY/HOST
201
MAIN PATIO
109
1,162 SF
WEST PATIO
205
Revision Date
NORTH A100
1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MAIN BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0"FIRSTFLOOROVERALL
MAINBUILDING*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 16
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
STEEL GATES
(TYP. OF 4)FLUSH CURB
77'-0"
42'-7"
SOLID
STEEL ROLLING
GATE
SOLID
STEEL GATEDNDN
12'-0"12'-0"3'-2"3'-4"15'-0"
ROLL-AWAY TRASH
AND RECYCLE10'-8"
124CONTINUOUS TRENCH
DRAIN PLUMBED TO SAND/OIL
INTERCEPTOR
125
RISER SES
3'-0"
GREASE INTERCEPTOR
002
17'-9"
Y-02 Y-01 Revision Date
OPEN SERVICE YARD OPEN YARD OPEN YARDSOLID
STEEL ROLLING
GATE 001
KITCHEN
NORTH A101
1 FIRST FLOOR OPEN SERVICE AND TRASH YARD: PLAN
3/16" = 1'-0"FIRSTFLOOR
SERVICEYARDPLAN*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 17
4'-6"
CONSULTANTS:
31'-7"
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
48'-5"
31'-3"7'-3"9'-11"
BAR
301
400SF
S1 @ 20'
SVC/BEV
302
DRYSTORAGE 191.5
305
298SF
COFFEE
308
319SF
WATERTREATMENT WALK-IN303
64SF 304
106SF
OFFICE
309
146SF
RESTROOMS
306
315SF
RISER
307
77SF
Revision Date
26'-1"
NORTH A120
1 FLOOR PLAN - CABANA BAR
3/16" = 1'-0"FLOORPLAN
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 18
ROOF PLANKEYNOTES
SHEETA140 DETALREF
05.12 Steelstair
07.01 Foamroof(sloped to drain min 1/8"/foot)
22.05 Roofdrain connected to in-wallRDL
(see plumbing). Ties in to underground
(see civil)
22.06 Overflowroofdrain connected to in-wall
RDL(see plumbing). Daylights at
exterior ofbuilding, See elevations.
23.01 HVACequipment at roof(see
mechanicalplans)
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
22.05 22.05 EAVE
+15'-0"T.O.P
EL.
EL.=
=+20'-6"
22.06 22.06
T.O.P
EL. = +20'-6"ROOF
EL. = +11'-0" (50% OPEN TRELLIS)
23.01
EAVE EAVE EAVE
EL.=+15'-0"EL.=+25'-0"EL.=+15'-0"
ROOF
EL. = +15'-6" (SLOPING)
PEAK/RIDGELINE
EL.=+25'-0"
ROOF
EL. = +12'-10" (SLOPING)
07.01
23.01
+20'-6"
T.O.P
EL.=EAVE
+15'-0"EL.=
ROOF
EL. = +13'-6" (SLOPING)
Revision Date
ROOF
EL. = +13'-0" (50% OPEN TRELLIS)
NORTH A140
1 ROOF PLAN - MAIN BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0"ROOFPLAN
MAINBUILDING*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 19
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
ROOF PLANKEYNOTES DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTIONSHEETA141DETALREF
07.01 Foamroof(sloped to drain min 1/8"/foot)
10.01 Exterior building-mounted sign.
Coordinate with electricalfor power, OV
for mounting requirements. Byseparate
permit.
T.O.P
EL. = +17'-0"
22.05 Roofdrain connected to in-wallRDL
(see plumbing). Ties in to underground
(see civil)
LINE OF ROOF BELOW 22.06 Overflowroofdrain connected to in-wall
RDL(see plumbing). Daylights at
exterior ofbuilding, See elevations.
23.01 HVACequipment at roof(see
mechanicalplans)
07.01
22.05 22.05
22.06 22.06
22.05 22.05
T.O.P
EL. = +12'-0"07.01
22.06
22.06
22.06
22.06
T.O.P
EL. = +16'-0"
22.05
T.O.P
22.05
07.01
10.01
EL.= +16'-0"
Revision Date
T.O.P
EL. = +16'-0"
NORTH A141
1 ROOF PLAN - CABANA BUILDING
3/16" = 1'-0"ROOFPLAN
CABANABUILDING*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 20
74'-6"0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(
7 3 3A 2A 2 3 39 41 24 6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6 6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6
2 INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C) SQUARE-CUT
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER BUILDING ACCENT
MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
19 STORERFONT WINDOWS (BRONZE ANODIZED/CLEAR
GLASS)
20 HARIDE PLANK SIDING (F) HARDIE SIDING 'EVENING
BLUE' JAMES HARDIE CEDARMILL SIDING 7.25" X 144"
6" EXPOSURE
2A CIP BOARD-FORMED CONCRETE (AK)
MANUFACTURER: JAMES HARDIE COMPANY
22 FDC3STANDING SEAM METAL (DARK GRAY) (A) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'DARK BRONZE' 24
GA. MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
23 FIRE RISER ROOM
24 STEEL C CHANNEL (PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
3A STANDING SEAM METAL (LIGHT GRAY) (B) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
25 STEEL GATES AT SERVICE YARD (PAINTED PT-02) (D)
PT-02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL'
SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal
Primer withMANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
4 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (B) WESTERN WAVE
METAL RIGID ROOFING 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
27 GAS FIREPLACE CONSULTANTS:
28 GLUELAM WOOD BEAM (E)
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING 29 TREX CLADDING (G) TREX TRANSCEND IN 'TIKI
TORCH' 5.5" PLANK
MANUFACTURER: TREX COMPANY, INC.
7
6
GLUELAM WOOD SHADE TRELLIS (E)
8'-0" HIGH WROUGHT-IRON FENCE
30 GLASS GARAGE DOOR
31 BAR WITH TILE BAR DIE WALL
8 STEEL COLUMN (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
33 PLATE STEEL SADDLE STRAP (PT-02) (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Glosstwo coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss CERTIFICATION:
9 OPERABLE STORERFONT WINDOW SYSTEM 34 ENGINEERED WOOD COLUMN
35 HOLLOW METAL DOOR (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss388510 MASONRY WALL AT OUTDOOR STAGE CLAD IN
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C)PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR11 MASONRY WALL 36 STEEL BEAM (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with CONSTRUCTION
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
12 SERVICE YARD ENCLOSURE (CIP BOARD-FORMED
CONCRETE) (AK) ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
38 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE SCHEDULE)
39 ADDRESS NUMERALS
40 MECHANICAL UNITS (BEYOND) SCREENED BY
PARAPET13 OPAQUE METAL GATES PAINTED PT-02 (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
41 CRL GLASS BALUSTRADE SYSTEM
PLAZIT 'POLYGAL' 'ICE' CORRUGATED
42 POLYCARBONAT ROOFING102'-9"
14 ENGINEERED WOOD GATE TO MATCH FENCE
15 SIGNAGE (BY SEPARATE PERMIT)
STEEL KNIFE EGDE PARAPET CAP PAINTED PT-02 SW
43 7601 'NIGHT OWL'
2 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST
3/16" = 1'-0"
17 SES (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial
Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
18 CABANA BUILDING (SEE ELEVATIONS)102'-9"
24 41 2 2 24 27 3 3A 19 3 24 15 19 3 2 15 2 3A 3 2A 7
Revision Date
A200
1 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST
3/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIORELEVATIONS
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 21
0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(
6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6 6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/623222A1233A13122INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C) SQUARE-CUT
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER BUILDING ACCENT
MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
19 STORERFONT WINDOWS (BRONZE ANODIZED/CLEAR
GLASS)
20 HARIDE PLANK SIDING (F) HARDIE SIDING 'EVENING
BLUE' JAMES HARDIE CEDARMILL SIDING 7.25" X 144"
6" EXPOSURE
2A CIP BOARD-FORMED CONCRETE (AK)
3 STANDING SEAM METAL (DARK GRAY) (A) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'DARK BRONZE' 24
GA. MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
MANUFACTURER: JAMES HARDIE COMPANY
22 FDC
23 FIRE RISER ROOM3A STANDING SEAM METAL (LIGHT GRAY) (B) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
24 STEEL C CHANNEL (PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
4 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (B) WESTERN WAVE
METAL RIGID ROOFING 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
25 STEEL GATES AT SERVICE YARD (PAINTED PT-02) (D)
PT-02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL'
SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal
Primer with
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
48'-10"7
6
8
GLUELAM WOOD SHADE TRELLIS (E)
8'-0" HIGH WROUGHT-IRON FENCE
27 GAS FIREPLACE CONSULTANTS:
28 GLUELAM WOOD BEAM (E)
STEEL COLUMN (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
29 TREX CLADDING (G) TREX TRANSCEND IN 'TIKI
TORCH' 5.5" PLANK
MANUFACTURER: TREX COMPANY, INC.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss 30 GLASS GARAGE DOOR
9 OPERABLE STORERFONT WINDOW SYSTEM 31 BAR WITH TILE BAR DIE WALL
10 MASONRY WALL AT OUTDOOR STAGE CLAD IN
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C)33 PLATE STEEL SADDLE STRAP (PT-02) (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
11 MASONRY WALL
12 SERVICE YARD ENCLOSURE (CIP BOARD-FORMED
CONCRETE) (AK) ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
CERTIFICATION:
34 ENGINEERED WOOD COLUMN
17'-9"13 OPAQUE METAL GATES PAINTED PT-02 (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
35 HOLLOW METAL DOOR (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR77'-0"
14 ENGINEERED WOOD GATE TO MATCH FENCE
15 SIGNAGE (BY SEPARATE PERMIT)
36 STEEL BEAM (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
16'-9"26'-0"CONSTRUCTION
17 SES (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial
Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
38 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE SCHEDULE)
39 ADDRESS NUMERALStwo coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
18 CABANA BUILDING (SEE ELEVATIONS)40 MECHANICAL UNITS (BEYOND) SCREENED BY
PARAPET
41 CRL GLASS BALUSTRADE SYSTEM
PLAZIT 'POLYGAL' 'ICE' CORRUGATED
42 POLYCARBONAT ROOFING
STEEL KNIFE EGDE PARAPET CAP PAINTED PT-02 SW
43 7601 'NIGHT OWL'
2 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH
3/16" = 1'-0"
2A 7 24 2 15 7 3 3 19 3A 20 40 23 22 2A
17'-9"
Revision Date
GRADE 0'-0"
(EL: 1229.5')128'-10"A201
1 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH
3/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIORELEVATIONS
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 22
0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(
6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6 6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6
2 INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C) SQUARE-CUT
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER BUILDING ACCENT
MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
19 STORERFONT WINDOWS (BRONZE ANODIZED/CLEAR
GLASS)
20 HARIDE PLANK SIDING (F) HARDIE SIDING 'EVENING
BLUE' JAMES HARDIE CEDARMILL SIDING 7.25" X 144"
6" EXPOSURE
2A CIP BOARD-FORMED CONCRETE (AK)
2A 24 19 24 3 19 2 MANUFACTURER: JAMES HARDIE COMPANY
22 FDC3STANDING SEAM METAL (DARK GRAY) (A) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'DARK BRONZE' 24
GA. MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
23 FIRE RISER ROOM
24 STEEL C CHANNEL (PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
3A STANDING SEAM METAL (LIGHT GRAY) (B) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
25 STEEL GATES AT SERVICE YARD (PAINTED PT-02) (D)
PT-02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL'
SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal
Primer withMANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
4 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (B) WESTERN WAVE
METAL RIGID ROOFING 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
27 GAS FIREPLACE CONSULTANTS:
28 GLUELAM WOOD BEAM (E)
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING 29 TREX CLADDING (G) TREX TRANSCEND IN 'TIKI
TORCH' 5.5" PLANK
MANUFACTURER: TREX COMPANY, INC.
7
6
GLUELAM WOOD SHADE TRELLIS (E)
8'-0" HIGH WROUGHT-IRON FENCE
30 GLASS GARAGE DOOR
31 BAR WITH TILE BAR DIE WALL
8 STEEL COLUMN (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
33 PLATE STEEL SADDLE STRAP (PT-02) (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Glosstwo coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss CERTIFICATION:
9 OPERABLE STORERFONT WINDOW SYSTEM 34 ENGINEERED WOOD COLUMN
35 HOLLOW METAL DOOR (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
10 MASONRY WALL AT OUTDOOR STAGE CLAD IN
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C)PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR11 MASONRY WALL 36 STEEL BEAM (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with CONSTRUCTION
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
12 SERVICE YARD ENCLOSURE (CIP BOARD-FORMED
CONCRETE) (AK) ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
38 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE SCHEDULE)
39 ADDRESS NUMERALS
40 MECHANICAL UNITS (BEYOND) SCREENED BY
PARAPET13 OPAQUE METAL GATES PAINTED PT-02 (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
41 CRL GLASS BALUSTRADE SYSTEM
PLAZIT 'POLYGAL' 'ICE' CORRUGATED
42 POLYCARBONAT ROOFING
14 ENGINEERED WOOD GATE TO MATCH FENCE
15 SIGNAGE (BY SEPARATE PERMIT)
STEEL KNIFE EGDE PARAPET CAP PAINTED PT-02 SW
43 7601 'NIGHT OWL'
GRADE 0'-0"
(EL: 1229.5')
17 SES (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial
Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with2MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH
3/16" = 1'-0"two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
18 CABANA BUILDING (SEE ELEVATIONS)
9 2 41 24 29 43 41 3A 19 3 24 2 24 7
Revision Date
GRADE 0'-0"
(EL: 1229.5')184'-6"173'-4"A202
1 MAIN BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH
3/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIORELEVATIONS
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 23
2 8 8 3A 3 8 0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(0$7(5,$/ꢀ$1'ꢀ),1,6+ꢀ6&+('8/(
6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6 6((ꢀ6+((7ꢀ$ꢁꢂꢃꢀ)25ꢀ$'',7,21$/ꢀ'(7$,/ꢀ21ꢀ0$7(5,$/6
2 INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C) SQUARE-CUT
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER BUILDING ACCENT
MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
19 STORERFONT WINDOWS (BRONZE ANODIZED/CLEAR
GLASS)
20 HARIDE PLANK SIDING (F) HARDIE SIDING 'EVENING
BLUE' JAMES HARDIE CEDARMILL SIDING 7.25" X 144"
6" EXPOSURE
2A CIP BOARD-FORMED CONCRETE (AK)
MANUFACTURER: JAMES HARDIE COMPANY
22 FDC3STANDING SEAM METAL (DARK GRAY) (A) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'DARK BRONZE' 24
GA. MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
23 FIRE RISER ROOM
24 STEEL C CHANNEL (PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
3A STANDING SEAM METAL (LIGHT GRAY) (B) WESTERN
WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
25 STEEL GATES AT SERVICE YARD (PAINTED PT-02) (D)
PT-02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL'
SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal
Primer withMANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
4 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (B) WESTERN WAVE
METAL RIGID ROOFING 'SLATE GRAY' 24 GA.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
27 GAS FIREPLACE CONSULTANTS:
28 GLUELAM WOOD BEAM (E)
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING 29 TREX CLADDING (G) TREX TRANSCEND IN 'TIKI
TORCH' 5.5" PLANK
MANUFACTURER: TREX COMPANY, INC.
7
6
GLUELAM WOOD SHADE TRELLIS (E)
8'-0" HIGH WROUGHT-IRON FENCE
30 GLASS GARAGE DOOR
31 BAR WITH TILE BAR DIE WALL
8 STEEL COLUMN (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
33 PLATE STEEL SADDLE STRAP (PT-02) (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Glosstwo coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss CERTIFICATION:
3 CABANA BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"
9 OPERABLE STORERFONT WINDOW SYSTEM 34 ENGINEERED WOOD COLUMN
35 HOLLOW METAL DOOR (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
10 MASONRY WALL AT OUTDOOR STAGE CLAD IN
INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER (C)PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR11 MASONRY WALL 36 STEEL BEAM (PAINTED PT-02) (D) PT-02 SHERWIN
WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro
Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with CONSTRUCTION19928368
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
12 SERVICE YARD ENCLOSURE (CIP BOARD-FORMED
CONCRETE) (AK) ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
38 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE SCHEDULE)
39 ADDRESS NUMERALS
40 MECHANICAL UNITS (BEYOND) SCREENED BY
PARAPET13 OPAQUE METAL GATES PAINTED PT-02 (D) PT-02
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL' SHERWIN
WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
41 CRL GLASS BALUSTRADE SYSTEM
PLAZIT 'POLYGAL' 'ICE' CORRUGATED
42 POLYCARBONAT ROOFING
14 ENGINEERED WOOD GATE TO MATCH FENCE
15 SIGNAGE (BY SEPARATE PERMIT)
STEEL KNIFE EGDE PARAPET CAP PAINTED PT-02 SW
43 7601 'NIGHT OWL'
17 SES (PAINTED PT-01) (H) PT-01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
9161 'DUSTBLU' SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial
Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
18 CABANA BUILDING (SEE ELEVATIONS)
3 CABANA BUILDING - EAST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"
3A 19 9
6 3 8 3A 3A
Revision Date
A203
1 CABANA BUILDING - WEST ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"2 CABANA BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATION
3/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIORELEVATIONS
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 24
18" SQ.
16" SQ.
EQ.EQ.
3" x 18" SQ. PRECAST
PILASTER CAP
VP-F18SQ BY3" GAP (TYP.)
VALORI PRECAST
PERIMETER TUBULAR
STEEL FENCE (AS
OCCURS) SEE 1/A503
(4) 8X6X8 CMU BLOCK
TO FORM PILASTER
CONSTRUCTION W/ 1"2COVE GROUT JOINT.
GROUT FILL ALL CELLS.
SEE STRUCTURAL FOR
REINFORCEMENT
FINISH GRADE
CONCRETE FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEE STRUCT.
8 MASONRY PILASTER
3/4" = 1'-0"
2" SQ. HSS
HORIZONTAL PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED
7'-6"4'-0" GATE 2" SQ. HSS
1'-0"1'-0"1'-1"1-1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED
2" SQ. HSS
1'-0"(SEE PLANS)HORIZONTAL PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED1-1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED
2" SQ. HSS
HORIZONTAL PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED
HORIZONTAL PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED
GATE ON HEAVY-DUTY
SELF-CLOSING HINGES
1-1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED
4" SQ. HSS
POST PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED GATE ON HEAVY-DUTY
SELF-CLOSING HINGES
4" SQ. HSS
POST PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED
1-1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED
1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-XX AS SCHEDULED
SPACED EQUALLY
1/2" SQ. HSS
VERTICAL PAINTED
PT-02 AS SCHEDULED
SPACED EQUALLY
5 METAL VIEW FENCE ELEVATION
1/2" = 1'-0"5.1 1M/2E" =T1A'-0L" VIEW FENCE
GATE
3'-4" REPEAT
4"4"PER DOOR SCHED.
1" x 6" STEEL PICKET
PAINTED PT-02
AS SCHEDULED
1" x 6" STEEL PICKET
PAINTED PT-02
AS SCHEDULED
EQ.EQ
Revision Date1" x 4" STEEL BRIDGE
PAINTED PT-02
AS SCHEDULED
CENTERED
1" x 4" STEEL BRIDGE
PAINTED PT-02
AS SCHEDULED
CENTERED
4" TYP.
ON 6" VERTICAL ON 6" VERTICAL
GATE HARDWARE
PER DOOR SCHEDULE
A503
1 DECORATIVE TUBULAR-STEEL PERIMETER FENCE
1/2" = 1'-0"3 DECORATIVE STEEL FENCE ELEVATION
1/2" = 1'-0"4 DECORATIVE STEEL GATE
1/2"=1'-0"ARCHITECTURALDETAILS
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 25
CONSULTANTS:
A STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL
EXTERIOR WALLS - MAIN BUILDING AND CABANA BUILDING B STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF/WALL
PRIMARY EXTERIOR CLADDING - MAIN BUILDING C SQUARE-CUT INDIANA LIMESTONE VENEER
BUILDING ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS D PT-02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7061 'NIGHT OWL'
PAINT AT EXTERIOR STEEL FRAMES, METALS, FENCING CERTIFICATION:
WESTERN WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL
'DARK BRONZE' 24 Ga.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
WESTERN WAVE METAL RIGID WALL PANEL
'SLATE GRAY 24 Ga.
MANUFACTURER: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
MANUFACTURER: INDIANA LIMESTONE COMPANY (POLYCOR)SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
E GLUELAM WOOD BEAM
TRELLISES AT MAIN BUILDING ENTRANCE F HARDIE SIDING 'EVENING BLUE'
EXTERIOR BUILDING ACCENT MATERIAL G TIG EXTERIOR WOOD CLADDING
MAIN BUILDING EXTERIOR CEILINGS AND WALL ACCENT-NORTH H PT-01 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9161 'DUSTBLU'
PAINT AT SES DOORS AND FIRE RISER ROOM DOOR
JAMES HARDIE CEDARMILL SIDING 7.25" X 144"
6" EXPOSURE
TREX TRANSCEND IN 'TIKI TORCH' 5.5" PLANK
MANUFACTURER: TREX COMPANY, INC.
SHERWIN WILLIAMS Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer with
two coats of Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic Gloss
MANUFACTURER: JAMES HARDIE COMPANY
Revision Date
AE COMPACTED DECOMPOSED GRANITE
PER PLANS (AT CIP CONCRETE SEATING, ETC...)AK BOARD-FORMED CONCRETE AF SYNTHETIC TURF (DETAIL 7/A502)
GREAT LAWN (AND OTHER AREAS PER PLAN)AG PICKLEBALL COURT
PICKLEBALL COURTSBUILDING ACCENT MATERIAL. SITE WALLS
MANUFACTURER: BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOCK-UP REQ'DSPEC: DECOMPOSED GRANITE. COMPACTED
COLOR: GOLD CARAMEL MACCHIATO 3/8" MINUS 3" MID DEPTH
MFR: EARTHSTONE ROCK (Sales@EarthstoneRock.com)
SPEC: X-GRASS 'REC' 70oz. 1.25" PILE FIELD GREEN 5" PT SLAB AT 3000 PSI OVER VAPOR BARRIER AND GEOTEXTILE
SHEET. SLOPE 1:120 TRANSVERSE (3" TOTAL SLOPE)
MFR: JIMMY FOX.A630URETHANE BACKED. 4" COMP. AGG DRAIN ROCK WITH ANGULAR
ROCK COMPACTED FOR PERCOLATIION. MAT REQUIRED BELOW
TURF. MFR: X-Grass Scott Dickerson 512-632-9180
FINISHSCHEDULE*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 26
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A901
1 VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST AT CORNER OF 4TH AND THE RESORT PARKWAY
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 27
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A902
1 VIEW LOOKING NORTH AT CORNER OF 4TH AND THE RESORT PARKWAY
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 28
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A903
1 VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST AT BUILDING ENTRY
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 29
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A904
1 VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM THE RESORT PARKWAY
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 30
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A905
1 VIEW LOOKING WEST FROM THE RESORT PARKWAY
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 31
CONSULTANTS:
CERTIFICATION:
PROGRESS
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Date
A906
1 VIEW LOOKING SOUTH FROM PARKING LOT
PERSPECTIVES
*For additional information and project requirements and instructions visit www.brickandwest.com/build
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
JN 1266-002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bond Mendez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department
FROM: Tina Andersen
DATE: May 9, 2024
RE: Electric Pickle Project (DRC 2023-00248)
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Eureka Restaurant Group is requesting design review approval (DRC 2023-00248) for the proposed Electric
Pickle Project (proposed Project), located at 9350 The Resort Parkway, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.1
The proposed Project would implement a portion of the approved Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area
Specific Plan (IASP) (Empire Lakes) Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan Amendment Project (Approved Project). The
Empire Lakes Specific Plan is now referred to as The Resort Specific Plan.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the Empire Lakes/IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan Amendment
Project and certified the associated Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in May 2016 (Empire
Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR or Final EIR), State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2015041083). The
Empire Lakes Specific Plan Final EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code, Sections 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines
(California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.). The Empire Lakes Specific Plan
Amendment Final EIR is intended to serve as the primary environmental document for all entitlements
associated with implementation of Planning Area I (PAI) of The Resort Specific Plan, including all
discretionary approvals requested or required to implement the Specific Plan. Pursuant to Section 15162 of
the State CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent EIR may be required for a project unless the City determines, on
the basis of substantial evidence, that one or more of the following conditions are met:
A.When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall
be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in
the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1)Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous
EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
1 Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 0210-102-07
Exhibit B
Page 36
ELECTRIC PICKLE (DRC 2023-00248)
May 9, 2024
Page 2 of 6
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(a) The project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous EIR;
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in
the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
Consistent with this requirement, individual projects implementing the Specific Plan, including the
proposed Project (Electric Pickle), will be reviewed to determine if they are within the scope of the
development anticipated and evaluated in the Final EIR. If the implementing project is within the scope
of the Approved Project and analysis included in the Final EIR, no additional environmental review is
required.
Pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the analysis presented in Attachment A to this
document evaluates the proposed Project in comparison to the Approved Project and the analysis for
each environmental impact category in the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR to
determine if the previous analysis adequately addresses the potential impacts of the proposed Project.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR addressed the construction-related and
operational environmental impacts that would result from redevelopment of the 160-acre Empire
Lakes Golf Course with a proposed mixed-use, high-density residential/commercial development. A
maximum of 3,450 residential units and 220,000 square feet (sf) of non-residential uses is allowed by
the Approved Project in PAI of the Specific Plan area. As further described below, the currently
proposed Project involves construction and operation of an approximately 12,074.50 sf one-story
building for a restaurant/bar with outdoor patio dining; nine pickleball courts; two bocce ball courts;
and an approximately 1,770.50 sf building with a coffee bar, restrooms, and storage within the Project
site.
Page 37
ELECTRIC PICKLE (DRC 2023-00248)
May 9, 2024
Page 3 of 6
1) Location and Setting
The Project site encompasses approximately 2.7 acres and is bound by The Resort Parkway to the east,
4th Street to the south, Cleveland Avenue (a private drive) to the west, and The Resort Specific Plan
Parcel S-18 to the north. The Project site includes all of Parcel S-19 within The Resort Specific Plan, which
includes the Mixed Use (MU) Placetype. The MU Placetype allows for commercial and medium-high
density residential land uses.
The Project site is disturbed from previously completed mass grading operations and is currently being
used for construction staging for the Homecoming at the Resort Project, which is also part of the Specific
Plan area and under construction to the north. A temporary basin is located in the southwest corner of
the Project site. Parcel S-18 adjacent to the Project site to the north is being developed with multi-family
residential uses. East of the Project site and The Resort Parkway are multi-family residential uses. South
of the Project site and 4th Street is undeveloped land located in the City of Ontario. West of the Project
site and Cleveland Avenue is the Empire Corporate Plaza office space. The existing land use, and General
Plan and Zoning designations for the Project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Urban Neighborhood The Resort Specific Plan, Planning Area 1A
North Multi-Family Residential Urban Neighborhood The Resort Specific Plan, Planning Area 1A
South City of Ontario Urban Commercial Ontario Center Specific Plan
East Multi-Family Residential Urban Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan, Planning Area 1A
and
Center 2 Limited
West Office/Business Park 21st Century Employment Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
2) Proposed Site Plan and Development Characteristics
The proposed site plan, building elevations, and conceptual renderings for the proposed Project, which
consists of an entertainment and sports-lifestyle hospitality venue, are attached. The proposed Project
involves the construction of two commercial buildings totaling 13,845 sf, which is within the allowed
maximum floor area of 35,000 sf. Building 1 would be approximately 12,074.50 sf and located in the
center of the Project site. Building 2 would be 1,770.50 sf and located at the southeast corner of the
site. The larger building is the single-story primary structure proposed to include, but not be limited to, a
restaurant, bar, outdoor dining and associated kitchen and support space. It also includes a small retail
“pro shop,” an indoor golfing range simulation, and restrooms. The smaller single-story building would
include a coffee bar, restrooms, storage space, and would feature a walk-up window that faces the
public right-of-way on the corner of 4th Street and The Resort Parkway.
Building 1 would have a varied roof line and would have a maximum height of 25 feet at the top of the
roof, with architectural features, including signage with the name of the proposed Project extending to a
maximum height of 29 feet 10 inches. Building 2 would be 16 feet; however, the building would have
Page 38
ELECTRIC PICKLE (DRC 2023-00248)
May 9, 2024
Page 4 of 6
also have signage on the roof extending to a maximum height of 27 feet, 3 inches. The proposed
buildings would not exceed the maximum allowed building height of 60 feet. The proposed Project
would also comply with pertinent development standards for the MU Placetype related to setbacks
from roadways.
The proposed buildings would have an industrial architectural style including standing seam metal
paneling painted with a palette of two colors (dark bronze and slate gray). The buildings would include
Hardie siding panels in an evening blue color finish, and Indiana limestone veneer accents at various
locations. Outdoor dining is provided on the south side of the primary building and a walk-up window is
provided on the south side of the secondary building; therefore, there is limited building articulation
provided along the south elevations in order to maximize the efficiency of the space. Trellis projections
aide in breaking up the building façades. Additionally, the application of glass panels along the building’s
rear elevations, which is mostly visible from the parking lot and property to the north, adds architectural
interest to the wall planes.
Vehicular access to the Project site would be via one driveway on the east side of the Project site along
The Resort Parkway. Vehicle parking would be located on the northern and eastern portions of the
Project site. The proposed Project includes 139 stalls, which would exceed the parking requirement (107
stalls). Pedestrian access to the Project site would be available from the west, north, east and southeast.
The southeast entrance would accommodate walk-up guests to the coffee bar without them having to
enter the perimeter of the facility. Bicycle parking would be provided between the east parking lot and
the primary structure.
A decorative tubular steel fence is proposed along the north, south, and west perimeter of the Project
site with gates located along the northern and western sides of the property for pedestrian access. The
tubular steel fence along the northern property boundary would generally extend east from the existing
concrete wall that extends along the southern boundary of the residential neighborhood to the north.
Along the east perimeter of the Project site and transitioning to the interior of the site there would be
tubular steel fencing and a solid block wall. A solid block wall is also proposed along the northern side of
the trash receptacle area near the southwestern portion of the parking lot.
The proposed Project includes nine pickleball courts, two bocce ball courts, and an open lawn area with
synthetic turf for general leisure. Eight of the nine pickleball courts, with shaded seating areas on the
north side of the courts, would be located along the southern side of the Project site. Two bocce ball
courts, with shaded seating areas on the west side of the courts, and the remaining pickleball court, with
shaded seating areas on the south side of the court, would be located along the western side of primary
building. The multi-purpose open lawn area and an outdoor seating area with firepits would generally be
located in the center of the Project site. A multi-purpose stage with a canopy would be located east of
the open lawn area.
Landscaping would be planted throughout the Project site, and would generally be distributed along the
Project’s 4th Street frontage, along the western property line, and throughout the parking lot (refer to
the attached landscape plan). There would also be landscaping including trees within the
interior/central portion of the site. Tiered landscaping would be planted along the street frontages in
compliance with The Resort Specific Plan.
Page 39
ELECTRIC PICKLE (DRC 2023-00248)
May 9, 2024
Page 5 of 6
Utility infrastructure would be installed onsite to serve the proposed uses and would connect to existing
backbone infrastructure that has been installed to serve approved development within Specific Plan
area.
3) Project Operations
Proposed uses at the Project site would be open to the public. It is expected that the proposed Electric
Pickle facilities would be open from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. for full-service dining and entertainment;
however, it would open early for pickleball league and tournament play (starting as early as 6:00 a.m.).
The smaller coffee bar building would have limited operating hours (daily from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.).
It is expected that the facility would operate in three shifts with approximately 60 employees per shift. It
is estimated that there would be up to approximately 200 new employees associated with the proposed
Project.
4) Construction Activities
Construction of the proposed Project is expected to start in Fall 2024 and last approximately 12 months.
Construction of the residential uses south of 6th Street, which are part of the approved Homecoming at
the Resort, is expected to be complete or near completion before construction of the proposed Project
is initiated. Construction of a few planning areas within The Resort Specific Plan north of 6th Street is
expected to be initiated at the end of 2024 and would overlap with construction of the proposed
Project.
The Project site was previously mass graded and the finish grading required for the proposed Project
would require a limited amount of earthwork (478 cubic yards [cy] of cut and 5,089 cy of fill). The
construction-related analysis presented in the Final EIR assumed that there would be approximately 100
truck trips (50 heavy truck trips) per day during a peak construction day associated with building
construction, utility installation, and paving for the southern portion of the Specific Plan area, and that
this would overlap with similar construction activities in the northern portion of the Specific Plan area.2
Consistent with the construction activities evaluated in the Final EIR, construction of the proposed
commercial use would involve finish grading, building construction, utility installation, paving and
architectural coatings. Therefore, the construction activities for the proposed Project would not
generate daily truck trips or require the use of construction equipment in exceedance of that
anticipated and evaluated in the Final EIR.
2 The Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR assumed that construction in the northern portion of the Specific Plan
area would generate approximately 58 truck trips per day during demolition and site preparation; 5 truck trips per day during
grading; and 65 truck trips per day during building construction, utility installation and paving.
Page 40
ELECTRIC PICKLE (DRC 2023-00248)
May 9, 2024
Page 6 of 6
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CONCLUSION
Pursuant to Section 15168(c)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, “If the
agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures
would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered
by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required.” With regard to Section
15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the analysis presented in Attachment A:
1. There are no substantial changes associated with the proposed Project, that require major
revisions of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects.
2. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the
proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan
Amendment EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Empire Lakes Specific
Plan Amendment EIR was approved, that shows any of the following:
a) The proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Empire
Lakes Specific Plan Amendment EIR;
b) Significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in
the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment EIR;
c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed
Project, but the proposed Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; and
d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in
the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the proposed Project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Accordingly, none of the triggers for a subsequent or supplemental EIR have been met (CEQA
Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163), and it is concluded that construction and operation of the
proposed Electric Pickle Project, which implements the previously Approved Project, would not result in
environmental effects that were not examined in the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final
Program EIR. Pursuant to Section 15168(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, no additional CEQA
documentation is required for the proposed Project.
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
1
ATTACHMENT A
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FOR A PROJECT WITH PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED
PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
The following analysis addresses the potential impacts from the proposed Electric Pickle Project
(proposed Project) in relation to the analysis presented in the Empire Lakes/Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan Amendment Project Final Program Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) certified in May 2016 (Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR or Final EIR)
(State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2015041083). The discussion below is formatted to address each of the
thresholds addressed in the Final EIR, and the thresholds that were addressed in the Initial Study
prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR. It should be noted that, consistent
with the conclusions in the Initial Study, there are no agricultural, forestry or mineral resources located
in Planning Area (PA) I of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area (now referred to as The Resort Specific
Plan), including the Project site, and no further discussion of these topical issues is provided.
Applicable Project Design Features (PDFs), Regulatory Requirements (RRs), and Mitigation Measures
(MMs) from the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR are incorporated into the proposed
Project, as required by the City, some of which are specifically referenced below.
1.0 AESTHETICS
Threshold 1.1 Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
The proposed Project involves the development of Electric two single-level buildings for a restaurant/bar
and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball courts, outdoor dining and
gathering spaces, and surface parking within PAI of The Resort Specific Plan area at the northwest
corner of the 4th Street/The Resort Parkway intersection. The proposed development complies with the
development standards in The Resort Specific Plan and the Design Concept for view corridors, including
along The Resort Parkway (referred to the Final EIR as The Vine). Consistent with the approved Empire
Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Project (Approved Project) and the analysis in the Final EIR, due to the
proposed Project’s location in the southern area of the City and the lack of scenic resources in the
immediate area, the proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
resource. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed
Project.
Threshold 1.2 Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the
site and its surroundings?
The types and methods of construction activities for the proposed Project are consistent with those
identified and evaluated in the Final EIR. Construction staging will be located as far as possible from
existing residential neighborhoods east of the Specific Plan area, and perimeter screening will be
installed around the Project site, which will obstruct views of ongoing construction activities from
adjacent ground level vantage points (Final EIR PDF 1-2).
Trees previously located at the Project site (associated with the former golf course) have been removed
and mass grading has been completed. The proposed Project complies with the development standards
and design guidelines (architectural and landscape) identified in the Specific Plan, including height
restrictions (refer to PDF 1-1), with none of the proposed Project structures exceeding 29 feet 10 inches,
Page 56
2
including architectural features and signage, to create a visually cohesive urban community. The height
of the proposed buildings is well below the maximum permitted height of 60 feet. The proposed walls,
fences and gates along the perimeter of the Project and interior to the Project also would not exceed
the limits established in the City’s Development Code (refer to Final EIR RR 1-1).
Consistent with the conclusions in the Final EIR, the proposed Project will not substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings during construction or operation
resulting in a less than significant impact. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Threshold 1.3 Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The types and methods of construction activities for the proposed Project are consistent with those
identified and evaluated in the Final EIR. Construction staging will be located as far as possible from
residential neighborhoods, and temporary nighttime lighting will face downward and be shielded to
minimize casting light into the sky and lighting intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods (refer to Final EIR
MM 1-1).
As identified in the Final EIR, the Specific Plan area, including the Project site, is located in an
area that is already subject to nighttime lighting (e.g., existing buildings, parking lots, street lights,
security lighting, among others). Due to the urban nature of the area, “sky glow,” which is the
illumination of the night sky from urban uses, already occurs. As required by the City, as part of the
design review process, a lighting plan and photometric analysis has been prepared for the proposed
Project to demonstrate compliance with the lighting design requirements outlined in the Specific Plan
and to ensure that proposed lighting, including lighting for the pickleball and bocce ball courts, does not
exceed established lighting levels. Further, as shown on the building elevations, the exterior building
facades would primarily feature building materials (e.g., standing seam metal wall/roof panels, square
cut limestone veneer, Gluelam wood beam, Hardie siding, tig exterior wood cladding, and board-formed
concrete) that adhere to the architectural and landscape development standards and design guidelines
outlined in the Specific Plan and ensure that these materials will not result in potential glare impacts.
Consistent with the conclusions in the Final EIR, the proposed Project will not create a new source of
substantial light or glare, which will adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area during
construction or operation. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation
of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
The proposed Project is located in PAI of The Resort Specific Plan area and, consistent with the analysis
presented in the Initial Study of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, is not within the
viewshed of a State scenic highway. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Page 57
3
2.0 AIR QUALITY
Threshold 2.1 Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a significant and unavoidable conflict
with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2012 Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP) due to long-term emissions of nonattainment pollutants exceeding SCAQMD significance
thresholds and project trip generation substantially greater than the trip generation anticipated in the
City’s General Plan for PAI at the time the EIR was prepared.
The proposed Project involves the development of two single-level buildings for a restaurant/bar and
coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball courts, outdoor gathering spaces and
dining, and surface parking. No residential uses are proposed and no increase in the City’s population
would result. The Project Applicant has estimated that the proposed Project will generate approximately
200 potential jobs in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (compared to up to 373 jobs assumed in the Final
EIR). The proposed Project is consistent with the Approved Project, will not generate new population or
vehicular trips beyond those anticipated in the Final EIR, and incorporates applicable Final EIR RRs and
MMs discussed in the analysis below. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result
from implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR.
The SCAQMD adopted the 2022 AQMP in December 2022 (after certification of the Final EIR). The 2022
AQMP incorporates Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) growth forecasts as
presented in the SCAG 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
(2020–2045 RTP/SCS), which anticipated implementation of The Resort Specific Plan, including the
proposed Project. Thus, no conflict with the 2022 AQMP would occur with the proposed Project related
to growth assumptions, and no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Threshold 2.2 Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
Construction-Related Impacts
Maximum daily construction air pollutant emissions were estimated in the Final EIR to compare with
limits (thresholds) established by the SCAQMD. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) were determined to
be potentially significant; the maximum average daily NOx emissions were estimated to be 128 pounds
per day, compared with the SCAQMD threshold of 100 pounds per day. Emissions of all other pollutants
were determined to be below the SCAQMD thresholds. The Final EIR concluded that with incorporation
of RRs and MMs, regional and local construction emissions from the Approved Project, including NOx
emissions, would be less than significant.
The Final EIR analysis concludes that with implementation of Final EIR MM 2-1, which requires that all
“off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) shall meet Tier 3 off-
road emissions standards,” the maximum average daily NOx emissions would be 91 pounds per day,
compared with the SCAQMD threshold of 100 pounds per day. The proposed Project incorporates MM
2-1, which will also reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), respirable particulate matter
with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), and fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns
or less (PM2.5); Final EIR RR 2-1 and RR 2-2, which will reduce fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and
Page 58
4
PM2.5); and MM 2-2, which includes construction-related measures to further reduce criteria pollutant
emissions.
The Final EIR analysis scenario of maximum emissions assumed concurrent activities at various locations
within PAI. This included potential concurrent construction activities in the southern portion of PAI
(south of 6th Street) and mass grading in the northern portion of PAI (north of 6th Street). Construction of
the residential uses south of 6th Street, which are part of the approved Homecoming at the Resort, is
expected to be complete or near completion before construction of the proposed Project is initiated.
Should construction overlap, the Homecoming at the Resort construction activities would be in the final
stages of construction that do not involve heavy equipment. Additionally, construction of a few planning
areas within The Resort Specific Plan north of 6th Street is expected to be initiated at the end of 2024
and would overlap with construction of the proposed Project, which is expected to begin in Fall 2024.3
The Project site, which encompasses approximately 2.7 acres, was previously mass graded and the finish
grading required for the proposed Project would require a limited amount of earthwork (478 cubic yards
[cy] of cut and 5,089 cy of fill). Construction of the proposed Project will involve the use of the same
types of construction equipment assumed in the Final EIR for post-mass grading activities and in
compliance with the identified RRs and MMs. The type and amount of equipment to be used during the
construction activities for the proposed Project will vary on a daily basis but will be within or less than
the average maximums set forth in the Final EIR. As an example, post-grading building site equipment
used in the EIR construction scenario – at each active site – includes 1 crane (226 hp), 3 forklifts (89 hp),
1 generator (84 hp), 3 tractor/loader/backhoes (97 hp), and 1 welder (46 hp)4. Additional equipment is
used for paving and architectural coating (painting).
Therefore, criteria pollutant emissions from daily construction activities (e.g., from construction
equipment and trucks) from the proposed Project in conjunction with other construction within PAI
would not exceed that estimated in air quality analysis presented in the Final EIR. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Operational Emissions
Even with adherence to Final EIR RRs and MMs, long-term operational regional emissions of ozone (O3)
precursors (VOC and NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), PM10, and PM2.5 due to mobile and consumer
product sources from the Approved Project were determined to be significant and unavoidable.
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project with the development of two single-level
buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball
courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking. The proposed Project incorporates or
will otherwise comply with Final EIR RR 2-3 (which requires obtaining permits from the SCAQMD to
construct and operate in compliance with SCAQMD Rules 201 and 203 ); RR 2-4 (no wood burning
devices will be installed); RR 2-5 (provision of bicycle parking); RR 2-6 (compliance with odor, particulate
matter, and air containment standards); MM 2-3 and MM 2-5 (compliance with provisions of the
CALGreen Code related to parking), and MM 2-6 (limited truck idling and actions to encourage transit
3 Construction in the Final EIR for the Approved Project was anticipated to be completed by Spring 2024.
Because construction for the proposed Project and remaining development in PAI would start later than the
anticipated date in the Final EIR, estimated emissions are expected to decrease due to the natural turnover of
older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements.
4 The horsepower data are those specified in the CalEEMod emissions model and represent averages for actual equipment
that would be found on site.
Page 59
5
use). As discussed in Section 13.0, Transportation/Traffic, of this evaluation, the proposed Project is
consistent with the development assumptions for Parcel S-19 contained in the Final EIR and supporting
Traffic Impact Analysis. As concluded in the Traffic Memorandum included in Attachment B of this
document, the trip generation resulting from the proposed Project will be consistent with that assumed
in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Additionally, the proposed Project and associated operations will be consistent with that anticipated in
the Final EIR. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of
the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 2.3 Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant cumulative
regional and local construction emissions with the incorporation of Final EIR MM 2-1 and MM 2-2. It was
also concluded that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable cumulative long-
term regional emissions of O3 precursors (VOC and NOx), PM10, and PM2.5, which are all nonattainment
pollutants, due to mobile and consumer products sources. As discussed above, the proposed Project
incorporates applicable Final EIR RRs and MMs, is consistent with the construction-related and
operational aspects of the Approved Project, and is consistent with the assumptions used for the air
quality analyses in the Final EIR. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe cumulative impacts
related to construction and operation of the proposed commercial uses will result.
Threshold 2.4 Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact related
to (1) off-site CO hotspots, (2) exposure of persons to construction and operational phase criteria
pollutants, (3) exposure of persons to construction and operational phase toxic air contaminants (TACs)
generated on site, and (4) TAC on-site impacts from off-site warehouse/distribution center and train
operations.
Existing sensitive receptors in proximity to the proposed Project are the existing residential uses to the
east of PAI and within PAI; these residential uses were identified in the Final EIR and potential exposure
of residences to pollutants were addressed. As identified above, the Traffic Memorandum for the
proposed Project concludes that the trip generation for the proposed Project will be consistent with that
assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. The proposed Project will not increase average
vehicle delay at any intersection beyond that anticipated in the Final EIR. Therefore, the proposed
Project will not result in the creation of a CO hot spot, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.
As discussed in the Project Description, the construction activities associated with the proposed Project,
and the type of construction activities, will not exceed the construction assumptions that were the basis
for the analysis in the Final EIR. Therefore, construction activities for the proposed Project will not
expose off-site receptors to significant criteria pollutant emissions and the impact will be less than
significant. Further, TAC emissions during construction will also be less than significant. The proposed
commercial use, which is consistent with the use assumed in the Final EIR, will not involve any on-site
uses or operations that will generate TACs.
Page 60
6
No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR concluded that
construction-related odors associated with the Approved Project would be temporary, would not affect
a substantial number of people, and would be less than significant. It also concluded that odors from
operation of proposed uses would be no different than in surrounding development, would not be
considered objectionable, and would be less than significant. The proposed commercial use will not
involve any construction activities or uses that would generate objectionable odors that were not
anticipated for the Approved Project and analyzed in the Final EIR. Further, as required by Final EIR RR 2-
6, the proposed use would operate in compliance with established standards in Section 17.66.060, Odor,
Particulate Matter, and Air Containment Standards, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code. These standards address compliance with the rules and regulations of the air pollution control
district and the State Health and Safety Code related to noxious odor emissions and location of exhaust
air ducts away from abutting residentially zoned properties. Therefore, no new or substantially more
severe impacts will result from the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for
the Approved Project.
3.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Threshold 3.1 Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modification, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The Final EIR concluded that PAI did not support native plant communities and did not provide suitable
habitat for sensitive biological resources. The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely
within PAI and does not include any areas that were not part of the Approved Project development area
that was analyzed in the Final EIR. The Project site has been mass graded, and vegetation previously
found at the site (including trees) has been removed in accordance with permits issued by the City. The
Project site is currently being used as a construction staging area for the residential uses north of the
Project site and there is a temporary basin located in the southwest corner of the Project site.
Therefore, the Project site does not provide habitat for species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). No new or substantially more
severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed
in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Page 61
7
Threshold 3.2 Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Threshold 3.3 Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
The Final EIR concluded that that there were no wetlands, riparian habitat, sensitive natural
communities, or areas under the jurisdiction of the CDFW, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
USFWS, or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) located within PAI, including the previous
artificial ponds associated with the golf course. The physical impact area for the proposed Project is
entirely within PAI and does not include any areas that were not part of the Approved Project
development area analyzed in the Final EIR. The Project site has been mass graded, and the portion of
the artificial pond and vegetation previously found at the site have been removed in accordance with
permits issued by the City. Therefore, the Project site does not include wetlands, riparian habitat,
sensitive natural communities, or areas under the jurisdiction of the CDFW, USACE, USFWS or RWQCB.
No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 3.4 Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The Final EIR concluded that redevelopment of the previous Empire Lakes Golf Course would not affect
regional wildlife movement throughout the Inland Empire or within the South Coast region and would
not disrupt or adversely affect terrestrial wildlife species movement due to the lack of connectivity of
the Specific Plan area with other open space areas. It was also concluded that removal of artificial ponds
at the golf course would have a less than significant impact on migrating waterfowl and avian species.
The Final EIR identified that vegetation and trees throughout the golf course had the potential to
provide nesting opportunities for various birds and raptor species but compliance with the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, which
protect nesting birds and raptors (refer to Final EIR RR 3-1 and RR 3-2) would ensure that impacts to
nesting birds and raptors are less than significant. The vegetation and trees previously located at the
Project site have been removed and mass grading activities have been completed. However, there is
vegetation along the site-adjacent roadways that has the potential to support nesting birds and raptor
species. As identified in the Final EIR, construction of the proposed Project, which is located entirely
within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, has the potential to
impact nesting birds and raptors and with adherence to Final EIR RR 3-1 and RR 3-2 this impact would be
less than significant. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the
proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 3.5 Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Trees previously located within PAI, as identified in the Final EIR, have been removed in accordance with
required tree removal permits issued by the City. There are no trees currently located on the Project site
and the proposed Project will not conflict with the City’s tree protection policies outlined in the City’s
Page 62
8
Development Code (i.e., Chapter 17.80, Tree Preservation, and Section 17.16.80). No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, the
City of Rancho Cucamonga is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP); Natural
Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP); or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation
plan area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project will not conflict with the provisions of an
adopted plan. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the
proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
4.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold 4.1 Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
The Final EIR concluded that although not anticipated, there was a potential for discovery of previously
unknown archaeological resources during deeper excavation activities in native sediment during
construction activities in PAI. Potential impacts were determined to be less than significant with
implementation of identified mitigation measures, which identify actions to be taken if resources are
discovered (refer to Final MM 4-1 and MM 4-2). Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in the
area south of 6th Street, including the Project site, have been completed and no archaeological resources
were discovered.
It should be noted that, as with the Approved Project, the provisions of Assembly Bill (AB) 52 are not
applicable to the proposed Project. AB 52 is applicable to projects that have a Notice of Preparation
(NOP) or a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration filed on
or after July 1, 2015. The NOP for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR was distributed
in April 2015. AB 52 establishes a consultation process with California Native American tribes and
establishes Tribal Cultural Resources as a new class of resources to be considered in the determination
of project impacts and mitigation. AB 52 requires lead agencies to provide notice to tribes that are
traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed Project, if they have
requested such notice in writing. While project notification pursuant to AB 52 is not required for the
proposed Project, it is important to note that coordination with Native American tribes was conducted
during preparation of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment EIR (refer to Section 4.4, Cultural
Resources, of the Draft EIR). The required Final EIR mitigation measures will also protect unknown tribal
cultural resources should they be present at the Project site, although no tribal cultural resources were
encountered during mass grading activities at the site.
Therefore, construction of the proposed Project, which is located entirely within the physical impact
area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, and which will not require excavation into
previously undisturbed soils, will not impact known archaeological or tribal cultural resources. In the
unlikely event cultural resources are unearthed, Final EIR MM 4-2 outlines actions required to protect
such resources ensuring impacts remain less than significant. No new or substantially more severe
impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Page 63
9
Threshold 4.2 Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
The Final EIR concluded that although not anticipated, there was a potential for the discovery of
previously unknown paleontological resources during deeper excavation activities in native sediment
during construction activities in PAI. Potential impacts were determined to be less than significant with
implementation of identified mitigation measures, which identify actions to be taken if resources are
discovered (refer to MM 4-1, MM 4-2 and MM 4-3). Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in
the area south of 6th Street, including the Project site, have been completed and no paleontological
resources were discovered. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project, which is located entirely
within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, will not impact
paleontological resources with the implementation of MM 4-1, MM 4-2 and MM 4-3. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 4.3 Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
The Final EIR identifies that it is unlikely human remains would be encountered during construction of
the Approved Project, and with adherence to State regulations as outlined in Final EIR RR 4-1 (i.e.,
Sections 7050.5–7055 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California
Public Resources Code), impacts would be less than significant in the event human remains are
discovered. Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in the area south of 6th Street, including the
Project site, have been completed and no human remains were discovered. No new or substantially
more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was
analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as
defined in Section 15064.5?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, no
historic resources were identified in PAI and no impact to historic resources would result from
implementation of the Approved Project. The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely
within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR. No historic resources
exist on the Project site, which has been mass graded. No new or substantially more severe impacts will
result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
5.0 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Thresholds 5.1 and 5.2 Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
(i) Strong seismic ground shaking, or
(ii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction
The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project and there have been no changes related to seismicity or local geologic
conditions. Additionally, there are no proposed changes to the type of land use to be developed at the
Project site. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, due to site conditions (groundwater depth
Page 64
10
at 350 feet or more below the ground surface), the potential for seismic-related ground failure from
liquefaction will be low, resulting in a less than significant impact.
However, as with the Approved Project, the proposed Project will expose people and structures to
geotechnical hazards associated with seismic ground shaking and potential geology and soils impacts
will be the same. Mass grading of the Project site has been completed in accordance with applicable
portions of the California Building Code and/or applicable City ordinances (refer to RRs 5-1 and 5-2). The
proposed Project will also be constructed in accordance with the City’s Development Code resulting in a
less than significant impact, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially
more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was
analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 5.3 Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Mass grading activities at the Project site have been completed and were conducted in accordance with
applicable requirements identified in the Final EIR. Construction activities for the proposed Project will
be consistent with those identified and analyzed in the Final EIR; will occur within the physical impact
area for the Approved Project; and will also be conducted in accordance with applicable building
requirements.
As identified in the Final EIR, the Project site is located in a soil erosion hazard area, and there is
potential for soil erosion during construction. However, this impact is less than significant with
adherence to local and State regulations adopted to limit fugitive dust and erosion into surface waters.
Chapter 17.66.060 of the City’s Development Code requires development projects to comply with
SCAQMD requirements for control of fugitive dust (refer to RR 2-1 and RR 5-3). Further, construction
activities will be conducted in adherence to applicable local and State water quality requirements,
including the implementation of erosion-control Best Management Practices (BMPs) and in compliance
with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements (refer to RR
8-3).
As concluded in the Final EIR, once the proposed Project is operational, the potential for soil erosion via
wind and water will be minimized through the introduction of development, including paved parking
areas, buildings, courts, walkways, and landscaping. Landscaping will be installed in accordance with
requirements in the City’s Development Code to control soil erosion, among other purposes (refer to RR
5-4). No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed
Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 5.4 Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onsite or offsite
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR and
the Final EIR, PAI, which includes the Project site, is not located in an area subject to landslides or
liquefaction. The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the impact area
addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project and there have been no changes related to
seismicity or local geologic conditions. Additionally, there are no proposed changes to the type of land
use to be developed at the Project site. The proposed Project will be exposed to the same geotechnical
issues related to unstable soils as the Approved Project. Mass grading operations have been completed
at the site and the surrounding area in accordance with applicable portions of the California Building
Code. Further, unsuitable soils were removed during mass grading activities. Therefore, potential
Page 65
11
impacts related to unstable soil are less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.
No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 5.5 Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the physical impact area for the
Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR and onsite soils have a very low potential for expansion. No
new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
• Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.)
• Landslides?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI is
not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone and no active or potentially active faults are
known to exist in or near the Project site. Also, the low relief of the site and surrounding area precludes
the potential for landslides. The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the
physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR; therefore, no impacts related
to rupture of a known earthquake fault will result. No new or substantially more severe impacts will
result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
Consistent with the conclusions of the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan
Amendment Draft EIR, the proposed Project will connect to existing sewer lines and treatment facilities,
and septic tanks or an alternative wastewater disposal system will not be utilized. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
6.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Threshold 6.1 Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,
that may have a significant impact on the environment?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project with the development of two single-level
buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball
courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking. A maximum of 220,000 sf of non-
residential uses are allowed by the Approved Project in PAI. The commercial/retail uses previously
approved in PAI include 21,700 sf of commercial/retail uses associated with the Homecoming at the
Resort project. Therefore, the proposed Project’s commercial use will fit within the allotted maximum
Page 66
12
non-residential uses allowed by the Approved Project and complies with the Specific Plan. The proposed
Project does not involve the development of any residential uses.
The proposed Project incorporates or will otherwise comply with Final EIR MMs and RRs identified
previously under air quality, which may also serve to reduce GHG emissions. Final EIR PDF 6-1 (planting of
trees); RR 6-1 (adherence to Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards); RRs 6-2 and 6-4 (adherence to
applicable California Green Building Standards as designated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Green
Building Compliance Matrices); and MM 6-1 (use of energy efficient lights and appliances) are also
incorporated into the proposed Project, as required. As discussed in Section 13.0, Transportation/Traffic,
of this evaluation, the proposed Project is consistent with the non-residential development assumptions
for Parcel S-19 contained in the Final EIR and supporting Traffic Impact Analysis. As concluded in the Traffic
Memorandum, it is estimated that the trip generation for the proposed Project will be consistent with
that assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Further, as discussed in the Project Description,
the construction methods and equipment will be similar to that anticipated in the Final EIR. Therefore,
the estimated GHG emissions from operation of the proposed Project and construction activities
(amortized over 30 years) would not exceed the GHG emissions assumed for the Approved Project and
will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. Accordingly, no new or
substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Threshold 6.2 Would the conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas emissions?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and does not involve any changes to the type or
amount of allowed land use, or the amount of GHG emissions that would be generated during
construction and operation. Specifically, the proposed Project involves development of two single-level
buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball
courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking. Consistent with the conclusion of the
Final EIR that the Approved Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas emissions, the proposed Project,
which implements the Approved Project will also not conflict with applicable plans, policies or
regulations adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions. No new or substantially more severe
impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
7.0 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Threshold 7.1 Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The proposed Project does not involve any changes to the type of land use or amount of non-residential
(commercial/retail) uses to be developed as part of the Approved Project in PAI. Therefore, compared to
the Approved Project, there will be no change in the types of hazardous materials that will be used
during construction and operation of the proposed Project. As with the Approved Project, through
compliance with existing applicable hazardous materials regulations (e.g., Hazardous Material
Transportation Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA], the California Hazardous
Waste Control Act, and the California Accidental Release Prevention Program included as Final EIR RR 7-
1 and RR 7-2), and RR 7-3 (compliance with hazardous materials reporting requirements for businesses),
the proposed Project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the
routine transport, storage, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. This impact will be less than
Page 67
13
significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe impacts
will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 7.2 Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project. The previous golf course use and hazardous materials used for golf
course operations have been removed and the Project site has been mass graded. Consistent with the
conclusions of the Final EIR, the previous use of hazardous materials at the Project site or in the vicinity
will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The
proposed Project implements the Approved Project and short-term construction activities and long-term
operations will be consistent with that addressed in the Final EIR. Also, consistent with the conclusions
of the Final EIR, construction and operation of the proposed Project will involve the use of hazardous
materials that are typically associated with an urban environment. These materials will be transported,
used, stored, and disposed of in compliance with applicable regulations (refer to Final EIR RR 7-1 and RR
7-2) and will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset or accident conditions. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 7.3 For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard or people residing or working in the project area?
The Ontario International Airport is located approximately 1.25 miles southwest of the Approved
Project, which, in turn, is in the Airport Influence Area (AIA) established by the Ontario International
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP). Specifically, the Approved Project is within the
Airspace Protection Zones for the airport. The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and in
accordance with Final EIR PDF 7-1, the proposed Project complies with the height restrictions outlined in
Table 7.4, Development Standards, of The Resort Specific Plan. Specifically, no buildings will exceed the
60-foot height limit for the area south of 6th Street. The maximum height, including parapets, of the
proposed Project buildings is 29 feet 10 inches. Further, construction activities, Project structures, and
operations will adhere to applicable requirements outlined in the ONT ALUCP as presented in Final EIR
RR 7-4: Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, Subpart C, and applicable obstruction clearance
standards published by the FAA; avigation easement; and real estate transaction disclosure. Compliance
with applicable ONT ALUCP requirements will ensure that potential safety hazards related to airport
operations are less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter-mile of an existing or proposed school?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,
which includes the Project site, is not within ¼-mile of a school. There have been no changes to the
location of the proposed Project or schools in the area. No new impacts will result with implementation
of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Page 68
14
Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,
which includes the Project site, is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment. The Project site is now undeveloped and is also not on a current list of hazardous
materials sites. No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, there
are no private airstrips in the vicinity of PAI, which includes the Project site. There have been no changes
to the location of the proposed Project or private airstrips in the area. No new impacts will result with
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, the
Approved Project does not include any uses that would impede or interfere with implementation of the
City’s Emergency Operations Plan and would not exacerbate existing hazard conditions addressed in the
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and does not
involve a change in the type or location of uses in PAI, or a change in access and planned roadways.
Therefore, consistent with the Approved Project, the proposed Project will not impair implementation
of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No
new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in
the Initial Study.
Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,
which includes the Project site, is not in an area subject to wildland fires. There have been no changes to
the location of the proposed Project or identification of high fire hazard areas in the vicinity of the
Project site. Further, the Project site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ)5,
and is not within a State Responsibility Area6. No new impacts will result with implementation of the
proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
5 Based on review of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s (Cal Fire) Fire and Resources Assessment
Program (FRAP) accessed March 21, 2024 at https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.
6 The State Responsibility Area is the land where the State of California is financially responsible for the prevention and
suppression of wildfires. The SRA does not include lands within city boundaries or in federal ownership.
Page 69
15
8.0 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Threshold 8.1 Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Threshold 8.2 Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality
The physical impact area for the proposed Project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project and the receiving water bodies will be the same. Additionally, there
are no proposed changes to the type of land use to be developed at the Project site. The type of
construction activities and equipment for the proposed Project will also be the same as analyzed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project. Therefore, the types of pollutants that will be generated by the
proposed Project during construction and operation will be the same as the Approved Project.
The proposed Project incorporates Final EIR RR 8-1, which addresses compliance with the NPDES
General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General
Permit) and implementation of the Project’s SWPPP during construction. Further, as with the Approved
Project, the proposed Project will comply with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and all applicable City,
County, and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations and water quality standards
including compliance with applicable NPDES and municipal separate storm sewer (MS4) permit
requirements. Notably, a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)7 has been prepared for
the proposed Project (per Final EIR RR 8-2), which is consistent with the Master Plan of Storm Water
Quality prepared for the Approved Project. Additionally, operation of the proposed use will be
conducted in accordance with Chapter 19.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which is the
City’s Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (per Final EIR RR 8-
3). Stormwater runoff and nuisance flows from the Project site will be intercepted by area drains, drop
inlets, and trench drains throughout the site. Before the water leaves the Project site, a diversion
manhole will intercept the water quality flows and route them through a pretreatment clarifier. The
clarifier will remove trash, debris, oils, and pollutants from the first flush flows. A 96-inch diameter
detention system will retain the volume as it is infiltrated through vertical drywells.
Compliance with Final EIR RR 8-1 through RR 8-3 and implementation of the Project-specific SWPPP and
WQMP will prevent violations of water quality standards and the degradation of storm water quality.
Water quality impacts will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No
new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for
the Approved Project.
Threshold 8.3 Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite?
Threshold 8.4 Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially
increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding onsite or offsite?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project, and the physical impact area for the proposed
Project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. There are
7 Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Tentative Tract No. 20118 prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc. (May 8, 2023).
Page 70
16
no proposed changes to the type of land use to be developed at the Project site (commercial), the
pattern of development relative to pervious and impervious areas, and the proposed storm drain
system. Therefore, the increase in the amount and rate of runoff that will be generated by development
of the Project site will be consistent with the estimated runoff volume and rate as accounted for in the
Approved Project, and the required storm drain facilities will be the same.
The proposed onsite drainage will flow to area drains, drop inlets, and trench drains throughout the
Project site which will intercept the runoff. Storm water runoff from Project site will ultimately flow via
an 18-inch storm drain line beneath the pickleball courts to the existing 66-inch storm drain in Cleveland
Avenue near the southwest corner of the Project site. The drainage and detention system provides for
the retention and infiltration of water quality flows as well as conveyance of storm water and
accommodates the 100-year storm water runoff.
As identified in the Final EIR, PAI, including the Project site, is in the defined hydrologic conditions of
concern (HCOC)-exempt area on the County’s on-line Stormwater Facility Mapping Tool. Therefore,
additional detention (reduction) in peak runoff flows from storm events is not required. This is because
runoff from the site enters the Guasti-Cucamonga Regional Park and Turner Basins. Thus, increases in
runoff from development of the proposed Project will not lead to HCOCs. Changes in drainage patterns
at the Project site will be consistent with that evaluated for the Approved Project in the Final EIR and
will not lead to erosion, siltation, or flooding at downstream facilities. Impacts will be less than
significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe impacts
will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 8.5 Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity
of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of pollutant runoff?
Threshold 8.6 Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
As identified above, there are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the
Project site or the pattern of development. Therefore, the estimated increase in the amount and rate of
runoff that will be generated by development of the proposed Project will be consistent with the
estimated runoff volume and rate as accounted for in the Approved Project, and the required storm
drain facilities will be the same. Storm water runoff from the Project site will increase flows in
downstream lines, but will not exceed the capacities of the existing 66-inch storm drain located at the
southwest corner of the Project site. According to the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan 8
prepared for the Project, the design capture volume of runoff from the Project site will be 11,982 cubic
feet (cf) and the underground retention volume will be 14,958 cf, resulting in a retained design capture
volume of 125% of the Project site’s runoff. Storm water pollutants and storm water runoff quantities
will be reduced by implementation of the Project-specific WQMP. Consistent with Final EIR conclusions
for the Approved Project, no expansion of existing off-site storm drain facilities is needed for the
proposed Project. Additionally, the physical impacts associated with installation of on-site storm drain
facilities will be the same as evaluated for the Approved Project in the Final EIR. No new or substantially
more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved
Project.
8 Madole & Associates, Inc, 2023. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan. May 8, 2023.
Page 71
17
Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a
level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR,
potable water service is provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the Cucamonga Valley Water
District (CVWD), with the largest amount of water supply coming from the Chino Groundwater Basin.
The analysis in the Initial Study concluded that although implementation of development in PAI will
reduce the pervious areas available for potential natural recharge, the area of PAI is relatively small
(160.4 acres) in relation to the total size of the Chino Groundwater Basin, and the only source of water is
from direct precipitation, providing little opportunity to recharge. PAI is not within a groundwater
recharge area and the Approved Project would not deplete groundwater supplies. The physical impact
area for the proposed Project is approximately 2.7 acre and is entirely within the physical impact area
for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, and the proposed Project implements the Approved
Project. Therefore, consistent with the conclusions for the Approved Project, the proposed Project will
not interfere with groundwater recharge or deplete groundwater supplies. No new impacts will result
with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows?
Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Would the project result in inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,
which includes the Project site, is (1) not within a flood hazard area, (2) not within a dam inundation
area, and (3) not subject to inundation from a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No new impacts will result
with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
9.0 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Threshold 9.1 Would the proposed Project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to,
the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
With approval of the Empire Lakes/IASP Sub-Area Specific Plan Amendment and associated General Plan
Amendment and Development Code Amendment, the City of Rancho Cucamonga established new land
use regulations and development standards for development within PAI of The Resort Specific Plan,
including the Project site. The Final EIR concluded that these land use changes would not conflict with
any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
Page 72
18
As further discussed in the Project Description of this document, the proposed Project involves the
development of two single-level buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf),
outdoor pickleball and bocce ball courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking, and
complies with applicable development standards and other requirements outlined in the Empire Lake
Specific Plan and/or the City’s Development Code, as applicable. As with the Approved Project, the
proposed Project will not conflict with any applicable local or regional land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of
the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project physically divide an established community?
The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR concluded that
implementation of the Approved Project in PAI, which is surrounded by existing development, would
not divide an established community. The proposed Project is located entirely within PAI, implements
the Approved Project, and will not divide an established community. No new impacts will result with
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
As previously discussed in the Biological Resources section of this document, PAI, which includes the
Project site, is not within an adopted HCP or NCCP. No new impacts will result with implementation of
the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
10.0 NOISE
Threshold 10.1 Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant increases in long-
term ambient noise levels from project-generated traffic to off-site sensitive receptors, and at
residences adjacent to the Project site from noise generated on-site. Additionally, the Final EIR
concluded that potential noise impacts to off-site residential uses from operation of proposed uses in
PAI would be less than significant with adherence to the noise standards outlined in the City’s
Development Code and the California Building Standards Code.
With respect to traffic-generated noise, as discussed in the Traffic Memorandum, it is estimated that the
trip generation for the proposed Project, and in conjunction with the existing and previously approved
development in PAI, will be consistent with that assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Therefore, the proposed Project will not increase traffic-related noise levels along roadways internal and
external to PAI beyond that anticipated in the Final EIR as a result of implementation of the Approved
Project. Long-term noise levels from Project-generated traffic to off-site sensitive receptors will be less
than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.
Existing sensitive receptors closest to the Project site are the residential uses located east of the Project
site, just east of The Resort Parkway and within PAI. Additionally, the Project site is located near existing
residential uses east of and adjacent to The Resort Parkway (east of PAI), which were also existing when
the EIR was prepared, and residential uses under construction north of the Project site (within PAI).
There are no new sensitive receptors in proximity to the Project site. The Final EIR anticipated
Page 73
19
development of the Project site with commercial uses and analyzed noise impacts to sensitive receptors
resulting from operation of non-residential uses. As identified in the Final EIR, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code has noise level limits for noise generated from one property to another
and both noise level limits and hours restrictions for commercial and office operations. With adherence
to the noise limits established in the Development Code (refer to Final EIR RR 10-3 and RR 10-4),
operational noise impacts, including noise generated by the outdoor activities associated with the
proposed Project, will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 10.2 Would the project expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in potentially significant construction
vibration annoyance impacts to occupants of adjacent buildings (from heavy equipment operation close
to buildings), but this impact is reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of Final EIR
MM 10-1. The Final EIR also concluded there would be a less than significant impact for structural
vibration impacts.
The Project site, which is entirely within PAI, is east of existing non-residential office buildings to the
west (beyond Cleveland Avenue), and west of existing residential uses east of The Resort Parkway. Mass
grading activities, which the Final EIR concluded would result in potentially significant construction
vibration annoyance impacts to occupants of adjacent buildings (from heavy equipment operation close
to buildings), have been completed pursuant to previously issued permits. No significant vibration
annoyance or structural vibration impacts will occur with remaining construction activities associated
with the proposed commercial uses. Additionally, the proposed activities at the Project site would not
be a source of vibration.
No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 10.3 Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
The Final EIR concluded that construction of the Approved Project would result in temporary potentially
significant construction noise impacts from site preparation, demolition, grading, concrete and asphalt
crushing, green waste mulching, and similar construction activities.
As previously identified, there are existing office uses to the west of the Project site, existing residential
uses east of The Resort Parkway, and residential uses under construction north of the Project site.
Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, even with adherence to Final EIR RR 10-1 (construction
day and hourly restrictions outlined the City’s Development Code), and implementation of Final EIR MM
10-3 (installation of a temporary noise barrier between PAI and adjacent existing residences) and MM
10-4 (preparation and implementation of a construction noise mitigation plan), these receptors may be
exposed to temporary or periodic increases in noise during construction that exceed 65 dBA (A-
weighted decibel scale) at existing residential uses and 70 dBA (A-weighted decibel scale) at existing
office uses, resulting in a potentially significant and unavoidable impact. However, the construction
activities associated with the proposed Project, including the type of equipment that will be operated on
a daily basis, will not exceed the construction assumptions that were the basis for the analysis in the
Final EIR. Further, mass grading activities for PAI south of 6th Street, including the Project site, which
Page 74
20
involved the use of the largest equipment and generated higher noise levels than other construction
activities, have been completed. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result with
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Threshold 10.4 Would the project expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
The Final EIR concluded that construction noise from the Approved Project would potentially exceed the
noise level limits established in the City’s Development Code resulting in a potentially significant noise
impact. With implementation of RRs and MMs, impacts from construction noise that exceed the City
Development Code requirements would be reduced, but not to a less than significant level. This impact
is significant and unavoidable for the Approved Project. As described in the Project Description,
construction activities associated with the proposed Project will be consistent with the construction
assumptions that were the basis for the analysis in the Final EIR. Further, mass grading activities for PAI
south of 6th Street and including the Project site, which involved the use of the largest equipment and
generated higher noise levels than other construction activities, have been completed.
The Final EIR also concluded that potential impacts related to operational noise that exceeds the City’s
noise standards, including operational noise from proposed commercial uses, would be reduced to less
than significant levels. As discussed above, with adherence to the noise limits established in the
Development Code (refer to Final EIR RR 10-3 and RR 10-4), operational noise, including noise generated
by the outdoor activities associated with the proposed Project, will be less than significant, consistent
with the conclusions of the Final EIR.
Although the impacts of the environment on a project are not impacts pursuant to CEQA, as required by
the City, prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant will be required to demonstrate
compliance with the City’s noise compatibility standards.
Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed
Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR identified that the 60
dBA CNEL contour for the ONT does not lie within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the ONT ALUCP
identifies that Rancho Cucamonga is not an affected jurisdiction for noise. Additionally, PAI is not within
the vicinity of a private airstrip. Consistent with the conclusion of the Initial Study, the proposed
commercial uses, which are within PAI, are not within the 60 dBA CNEL contour for the Ontario
International Airport and will not be exposed to excessive noise levels from airport operations. No new
or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared
to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Page 75
21
11.0 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Threshold 11.1 Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
the extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
The proposed Project involves the development of two single-level buildings for a restaurant/bar and
coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce ball courts, outdoor gathering spaces and
dining, and surface parking within the portion of PAI south of 6th Street. The Project Applicant has
estimated that the proposed would generate approximately 200 jobs in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(compared to up to 373 jobs assumed in the Final EIR). No residential uses are proposed. The proposed
Project is consistent with the Approved Project and will not generate new population or jobs beyond
that anticipated in the Final EIR. It should also be noted that SCAG’s current regional growth forecasts,
adopted after certification of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR, include the growth
that will occur from implementation of the Approved Project, including the proposed Project. No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI
was previously developed with the Empire Lakes Golf Course and the Approved Project would not
displace housing or people. The Project site has been mass graded and there is no existing development;
the Project site is being used as a construction staging area for residential uses north of the Project site.
The proposed Project does not include residential development and will not displace housing or people.
No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was
analyzed in the Initial Study.
12.0 PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION
Thresholds 12.1 through 12.4 Would the proposed Project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
• Fire Protection?
• Police Protection?
• Schools?
• Libraries?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and involves the development of two single-
level buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce
ball courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking. The proposed Project does not
involve the development of any residential uses or an increase in the City’s population. While there
Page 76
22
would be an increase in employment, the estimated number of jobs is within that anticipated in the
Final EIR and the increased demand on public services (e.g., fire and police services), along with the
existing and previously approved developments in PAI, will not exceed that assumed and evaluated in
the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
As with the Approved Project, the proposed Project incorporates Final EIR PDF 12-1 (implementation of
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design [CPTED] features), RR 12-1 (compliance with applicable
codes, ordinances and standard conditions, including the current edition of the California Fire Code and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District [RCFPD] Fire Protection Standards and Guidance
Documents); RR 12-2 (payment of applicable development impact fees to the City for public services);
and RR 12-4 (payment of developer fees to the impacted school districts). The City has also purchased a
site for a potential future fire station (refer to PDF 12-4). Potential impacts to public services will be less
than significant, consistent with conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe
impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the
Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 12.5 Would the proposed Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for parks?
Threshold 12.6 Would the proposed Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
Threshold 12.7 Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and involves the development of two single-
level buildings for a restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), outdoor pickleball and bocce
ball courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking within the southern portion of PAI.
The proposed Project does not involve the development of any residential uses or an increase in the
City’s population. While there would be an increase in employment, the estimated number of jobs is
within that anticipated in the Final EIR. The proposed Project along with the existing and previously
approved development in PAI will not exceed that assumed and evaluated in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project. As identified in the Final EIR, the City does not require the payment of the Community
and Recreation Center Impact Fee (Final EIR RR 12-2) for non-residential uses, or dedication of land or
payment of in-lieu fees for the provision of neighborhood and community park or recreational purposes
(RR 12-3). No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed
Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Page 77
23
13.0 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Threshold 13.1 Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into
account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel
and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
The Final EIR concluded that vehicle trips generated by operation of the Approved Project would lead to
study area intersections and freeway facilities operating at deficient level of service (LOS) (exceeding
City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Ontario, and/or Caltrans standards). Even with implementation of RR
13-2 and RR 13-3, and MM 13-1 through MM 13-4, impacts would remain significant due to the lack of
feasible mitigation and/or because the Property Owner/Developer or the City of Rancho Cucamonga
cannot guarantee the implementation of improvements in another jurisdiction (i.e., in the City of
Ontario and on Caltrans facilities). Significant and unavoidable impacts were identified at I-10 and I-15
mainline segments and ramps under the Existing Year (2014) and/or Completion Year (2024) Plus Project
and Cumulative Year (2036) traffic analysis scenarios.
The proposed Project involves the development of two single-level buildings for a restaurant/bar and
coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), nine outdoor pickleball courts and two bocce ball courts, outdoor
gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking within the southern portion of PAI. A maximum of
220,000 sf of non-residential uses are allowed by the Approved Project in PAI. The commercial/retail
uses previously approved in PAI include 21,700 sf of commercial/retail uses associated with the
Homecoming at the Resort project. Therefore, the proposed Project, in conjunction with previously
approved commercial/retail uses would not exceed the allowed amount of non-residential development
within the Specific Plan area.
Fehr & Peers conducted an analysis of the proposed Project to determine its consistency with the
Approved Project as it relates to the traffic analysis assumptions that were the basis for the Final EIR
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for and presented in the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment
Final EIR. The City of Rancho Cucamonga The Resort Electric Pickle – Trip Generation Comparison Memo
prepared by Fehr & Peers (May 2024) is provided in Attachment B of this document (Traffic
Memorandum).
As presented in the Traffic Memorandum, the proposed Project is consistent with the Approved Project
with respect to the assumptions in the TIA as outlined in the following table:
Attribute TIA Assumption Proposed Project Consistency
Location Northwest corner of 4th Street
and The Resort Parkway Consistent – The Project site is within the Empire Lakes South boundary.
Access
The TIA assumed access by two
signalized intersections on 4th
Street and The Resort Parkway
and 6th Street and The Resort
Parkway
Consistent – Current plans for the proposed Project show one access point
from The Resort Parkway. Any trips generated by the proposed Project will
have to access the Project site through the southern intersection on 4th
Street or the northern intersection on 6th Street as originally intended in the
TIA.
Page 78
24
Size The TIA assumed area S-19 to
be 3 acres.
Consistent – The Project site is approximately 2.7 acres.
Use The TIA assumed area S-19 to
be a mixed-use area.
Consistent – The Resort Specific Plan defines area S-19 as a Mixed Use (MU)
Placetype which allows mixed medium-high density residential and non-
residential uses.
Access
Design
Access would be consistent
with the Specific Plan
guidelines and City Standards
Consistent
A review of trip generation from the proposed Project in conjunction with existing and approved
development within the Specific Plan area was conducted. As described in the Traffic Memorandum, the
same mixed-use trip generation methodology used in the Final TIA (referred to as mixed-use
development [MXD] trip generation) has been used to estimate proposed Project trips. The estimated
trip generation from the proposed Project is 42 AM peak hour trips, 105 PM peak hour trips and 1,120
average daily trips (ADT).9 The trips generated from the proposed Project in conjunction with existing
and previously approved development in PAI south of 6th Street is estimated to be 518 AM peak hour
trips, 729 PM peak hour trips, and 9,424 ADT 10, is fewer than the total number of peak hour trips and
ADT anticipated for PAI south of 6th Street (the Final EIR TIA estimated 682 AM peak hour trips, 897 PM
peak hour trips and 11,236 ADT for PAI south of 6th Street). Therefore, the TIA for the Approved Project
accounted for the proposed Project. There will not be an increase in trip generation with the proposed
Project compared to that assumed in the TIA and, with implementation of applicable PDFs, RRs, and
MMs (including payment of required transportation development impact fees required by Final EIR RR
13-2), no new or substantially more severe traffic impacts at study intersections or freeway mainline
segments will result.
With respect to construction-related traffic, as identified in the Project Description, the mass grading for
the Project site has been completed and the finish grading required for the proposed Project will require
limited earthwork and associated daily truck trips. Additionally, there will be heavy truck trips associated
with other construction activities for the import of materials, concrete, etc. Given the relatively small
size of the proposed Project, the number of daily heavy truck trips for the proposed Project would be a
relatively small portion of the estimated 50 heavy trucks on a daily basis in the Final EIR for development
south of 6th Street. Additionally, it is expected that the construction activities for the Homecoming at the
Resort residential uses north of the Project site would be complete or near completion when
construction of the proposed Project is initiated. Construction activities and associated truck travel will
be required to comply with applicable City requirements, including Chapter 10.56, Truck Routes and
Restrictions, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (refer to Final EIR RR 13-4). No new or
substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
9 The trip generation for the proposed Electric Pickle project was calculated by using a custom rate that was
derived from trip counts collected on a Thursday over a 14-hour period at a Chicken N’ Pickle in San Antonio,
Texas which is a similar use. This method more closely matched the proposed use for the project compared to
traditional ITE trip generation rates which do not exist for this land use type.
10 The trip generation for the existing and approved development in the Specific Plan area (dwelling units, office,
and retail) were calculated using standard trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th
Edition.
Page 79
25
Threshold 13.2 Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or
other standards established by the county congestion?
The Final EIR concluded that San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP)-designated
intersections and freeway facilities would operate at a deficient LOS with the Approved Project.
Identified mitigation for certain intersections is not feasible as the Property Owner/Developer and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot guarantee implementation of mitigation in the City of Ontario or for
Caltrans facilities. Impacts to CMP intersections were determined to be significant and unavoidable
along with freeway mainline segments and ramps along I-10 and I-15.
As described above for Threshold 13.1, there will not be an increase in trip generation with the
proposed Project, or with the proposed Project in conjunction with the previously approved 21,700 sf of
commercial/retail uses south of 6th Street in PAI, compared to that assumed in the TIA. As identified in
the Final EIR, there is no feasible mitigation for these impacts, and/or the Property Owner/Developer or
the City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot guarantee the implementation of improvements in another
jurisdiction. Therefore, significant and unavoidable impacts at CMP facilities identified in the Final EIR
will occur with the proposed Project. No new or substantially more severe traffic impacts at study
intersections or freeway mainline segments will result from implementation of the proposed Project
compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 13.3 Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Threshold 13.4 Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would provide adequate project access and an
internal circulation system (refer to Final EIR PDF 13-1), which would be in compliance with applicable
requirements for emergency access (refer to Final EIR RR 12-1). Notably, it was determined that there
would be: (1) sufficient internal accessibility throughout the Specific Plan area, (2) appropriate traffic-
control devices, (3) adequate spacing between external access points, and (4) adequate emergency
vehicle access. Impacts were determined to be less than significant and no additional mitigation was
required.
The proposed Project maintains the same primary access points to development in the southern portion
of PAI as the Approved Project (access to development in PAI south of 6th Street from the intersections
of The Resort Parkway with 4th Street and 6th Street), and the intersection improvements required by
Final EIR PDF 13-1 have been completed. The proposed Project will not change the types of uses
proposed in Specific Plan Parcel S-19 (commercial uses), and will not change the access requirements for
this area. Further, the proposed Project will adhere to applicable codes, ordinances and standard
conditions, including the current edition of the California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District (RCFPD) Fire Protection Standards and Guidance Documents regarding access (as
required by Final EIR RR 12-1).
Additionally, as identified in the Final EIR, access to the Project site during construction would be from
adjacent streets. As anticipated in the Final EIR, there may be limited partial lane closures along these
roadways during construction. The lane closures would be temporary and would not block all travel
lanes. Additionally, as required by Final EIR MM 13-5, a Traffic Control Plan would be prepared for
implementation during the construction phase to ensure that at least one unobstructed lane is
Page 80
26
maintained in both directions and that temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flag persons), or
other appropriate traffic controls be implemented, if needed.
Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the
proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Threshold 13.5 Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?
The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would promote the use of alternative transportation
systems (i.e., sidewalks, bikeways and bus service, transit). This would be accomplished by connecting
pedestrians and bicyclists to various locations on the Project site; to the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink
Station adjacent to and northeast of the Specific Plan area; to nearby employment-generating and retail
uses; and to bus facilities.
The proposed Project implements development allowed in the southern portion of PAI, north of 4th
Street. Consistent with Specific Plan requirements, the proposed Project includes pedestrian
connections to surrounding uses, and ADA-compliant pedestrian walkways within the Project site and
bicycle parking. Pedestrian access to the coffee bar is also provided from The Resort Parkway at 4th
Street without needing to enter the Electric Pickle facility. As with the Approved Project, the proposed
Project will not preclude pedestrians, bicyclists, or transit users from traveling along existing and
planned non-vehicular facilities and will facilitate access to the alternative transportation modes from
on-site land uses. The proposed Project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, nor will it otherwise decrease the performance
or safety of such facilities. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from
implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels
or change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR concluded that the
anticipated increase in population and employment generated by the uses that would be allowed by the
Approved Project would not be of a magnitude that would impact air traffic volumes. Further, the
Approved Project would not include any uses that would change air traffic patterns. It was determined
that no substantial safety risks would result from the Approved Project and no mitigation was required.
Consistent with the conclusion of the Initial Study, the proposed commercial use, which is entirely
within PAI of The Resort Specific Plan area and is consistent with the amount and type of commercial
development anticipated by the Approved Project, will not impact air traffic volumes or change air
traffic patterns. Therefore, there will no substantial safety risks from changes in air traffic patterns. No
new impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in
the Final EIR for the Approved Project.
Page 81
27
14.0 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Threshold 14.1 Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Threshold 14.2 Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
Threshold 14.3 Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Threshold 14.4 Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
Threshold 14.5 Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
Threshold 14.6 Would the project require or result in the construction of new electric, natural gas or
communication facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed Project implements the Approved Project and involves the two single-level buildings for a
restaurant/bar and coffee bar (a total of 13,845 sf), nine outdoor pickleball courts and two bocce ball
courts, outdoor gathering spaces and dining, and surface parking within the southern portion of PAI.
This development is within the maximum 220,000 sf of non-residential uses allowed by the Approved
Project in PAI. The commercial/retail uses previously approved in PAI include 21,700 sf of
commercial/retail uses associated with the Homecoming at the Resort development. Therefore, the
proposed Project’s commercial use are within the allotted maximum non-residential uses allowed by the
Approved Project and comply with the Specific Plan.
The proposed Project, in conjunction with the previously approved development, would not exceed the
projected demand for water or dry utilities or increase the amount of wastewater or solid waste
generation anticipated for the Approved Project and analyzed in the Final EIR. Because the amount and
types of uses proposed would be consistent with the Approved Project, the utility infrastructure (on site
and off site) needed to serve the proposed development would be the same as with the Approved
Project (e.g., water, sewer, electric, and telecommunication lines). As with the Approved Project, utility
infrastructure would be installed on site to serve the proposed use and would connect to existing and
planned utility infrastructure adjacent to the Project site. The physical impact area for the utility
infrastructure for the proposed Project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved
Project that was evaluated in the Final EIR.
The proposed Project incorporates water conservation requirements associated with landscaping (Final
EIR RR 14-3 and RR 14-4), and solid waste reduction requirements during construction and operation
(Final EIR RR 14-5 and RR 14-6). Consistent with conclusion of the Final EIR, the proposed Project will
have a less than significant impact related to utilities and service systems. No new impacts will result
from implementation of the proposed Project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the
Approved Project.
Page 82
28
Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water
Quality Control Board?
Consistent with the conclusions of the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan
Amendment Draft EIR, development within the City, including the Approved Project and the proposed
Project, is required to comply with all applicable wastewater discharge requirements of the NPDES
program, as enforced by the Santa Ana RWQCB. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project
would not result in an exceedance of wastewater treatment requirements and impacts would be less
than significant. No new impacts will result from implementation of the proposed Project compared to
what was analyzed in the Initial Study.
Page 83
ATTACHMENT B
TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM
Page 84
3750 University Avenue | Suite 225 | Riverside, CA 92501 | (951) 274-4800 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: Updated May 9, 2024
To: Tina Anderson, T&B Planning
From: Jason D. Pack, P.E.
Subject: City of Rancho Cucamonga The Resort Electric Pickle – Trip Generation Comparison Memo
OC24-1050
Fehr & Peers completed a trip generation comparison for the proposed Electric Pickle project
(proposed project) located at the northwest corner of 4th street and The Resort Parkway in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of a single-story 12,074.5 sq. ft.
building (which will function as a bar and sit-down restaurant), nine pickle ball courts with
additional outdoor/patio seating, and a 1,770.5 sq. ft. cabana area. The proposed project will be
located in the southern half of the Resort Specific Plan (formerly Empire Lakes Specific Plan) area,
which includes existing residential and recreation uses on the east side of The Resort Parkway
(511 units and the Club on 6th Street), and previously approved residential and non-residential
uses that are existing or currently under construction on the west side of The Resort Parkway (867
for rent apartment homes, an approximately 16,000 sq. ft. clubhouse/leasing center, and
approximately 21,700 square feet (sf) of commercial space) (herein referred to as the existing and
approved development). The purpose of this memorandum is to explain how the trip generation
of the proposed project in conjunction with the existing and approved development at the
southern half of the Resort Specific Plan does not exceed the trip generation in the Final
Transportation Impact Analysis for Empire Lakes (herein referred to as the TIA) and confirm that no
additional assessment is needed.
Fehr & Peers completed the Final Transportation Impact Analysis for Empire Lakes in October of
2015. The TIA provided the full transportation impact assessment for the Empire Lakes Specific
Plan project and identified measures needed to mitigate identified traffic impacts (including
timing of the proposed mitigation measures). The TIA served as the technical basis for the traffic
impact section of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan EIR.
Page 85
Tina Anderson May 9, 2024
Page 2 of 6
TIA and Proposed Project Comparison
Table 1 compares key attributes of the proposed project with the TIA assumptions to show
consistency with the TIA; thus, ensuring that transportation will not be affected. The Specific Plan
land use assumptions are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Electric Pickle Project Attributes
Attribute TIA Assumption Current Proposal Consistency
Location Northwest corner of 4th Street and The Resort Parkway Consistent – Project site for the proposed Electric Pickle project is within the Empire Lakes South boundary.
Access
The TIA assumed access by two signalized intersections on 4th Street and The Resort Parkway and 6th Street and The Resort Parkway
Consistent – Current plans for the proposed Electric Pickle project show one access point from The Resort Parkway. Any trips generated by the Electric Pickle project will have to access Empire Lakes South through the southern intersection on 4th Street or the northern intersection on 6th Street as originally intended in the TIA.
Size The TIA assumed area S-19 to be 3 acres.
Consistent – Plans for the proposed Electric Pickel project show the project site to be 2.7 acres.
Use The TIA assumed area S-19 to be a mixed-use area.
Consistent – The Resort Specific Plan defines area S-19 as a Mixed Use (MU) placetype which allows mixed medium-high density residential and non-residential uses. This retail use is consistent with the land use designation.
Access Design
Assumed to be consistent with the Specific Plan guidelines and City Standards Consistent.
Trip Generation Comparison
Fehr & Peers utilized the same mixed-use trip generation methodology to estimate project trips
as the TIA. The results are summarized in Table 2. The trip generation methodology, referred to
as mixed-use development (MXD) trip generation, is presented in Table 3.
The trip generation for the existing and approved development uses (dwelling units, office, and
retail) were calculated using standard trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual,
11th Edition. The trip generation for the proposed Electric Pickle project was calculated by using a
custom rate that was derived from trip counts collected on a Thursday over a 14-hour period at a
Chicken N’ Pickle in San Antonio, Texas which is a similar use. This method more closely matched
the proposed use for the project compared to traditional ITE trip generation rates which do not
exist for this land use type.
Page 86
3750 University Avenue | Suite 225 | Riverside, CA 92501 | (951) 274-4800 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com
Table 2: Current Development with Electric Pickle TIA Assumption Comparison
Notes:
1. South side: refers to the south side of the Resort Specific Plan which consists of the area between 6th Street and 4th Street.
2. Total: refers to the total development (north and south) at the Resort Specific Plan.
Time Period Electric Pickle + Existing and Approved Development (estimated from MXD trip generation methodology)
TIA Assumption Remaining Trips
(TIA Assumption) – (Electric Pickle + Existing and Approved Development)
AM Peak Hour 518 (See table 3) South Side:
AM – 682
Total:
AM – 1,676
South Side1:
AM – 164 (24% remaining)
Total2:
AM – 1,158 (69% remaining)
PM Peak Hour 729 (See table 3) South Side:
PM – 897 Trips
Total:
PM – 2,097 Trips
South Side1:
PM – 168 Trips (18% remaining)
Total2:
PM – 1,368 Trips (65% remaining)
Daily 9,424 (See table 3) South Side:
Daily – 11,236
Total:
Daily – 25,183
South Side1:
Daily – 1,812 (16% remaining)
Total2:
Daily – 15,759 (63% remaining)
Page 87
3750 University Avenue | Suite 225 | Riverside, CA 92501 | (951) 274-4800 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com
Table 3: Mixed-Use Development (MXD) Trip Generation Methodology
Land Use Units ITE Code1 Quantity Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)2
Dwelling Units 220 1,378 9,288 132 419 551 443 260 703
General Office Building3 1000 Sq. Ft. 710 5 54 7 1 8 1 6 7
Shopping Center4 1000 Sq. Ft. 820 10 370 5 3 8 16 18 34
Electric Pickle5 Courts Custom7 9 1,120 39 3 42 72 33 105
Net Raw Project Trips 10,832 183 426 609 532 317 849
MXD Reductions (Internal Capture, Walk, Bike, and Transit)6 -1,408 -27 -64 -91 -75 -45 -120
Net New Project Trips8 9,424 156 362 518 457 272 729
Notes:
1. Sources: Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021).
2. ITE rates for mid-rise multi-family housing are 6.74 for daily, 0.40 for AM peak hour, and 0.51 for PM peak hour. Low-rise
multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least
three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels).
3. ITE rates for general office building are: 10.84 daily trips per 1,000 sq. ft., 1.52 AM peak hour trips per 1,000 sq. ft., and
1.44 PM peak hour trips per 1,000 sq. ft.
4. ITE rates for shopping center are 37.01 daily trips per 1,000 sq. ft., 0.84 AM peak hour trips per 1,000 sq. ft., and 3.40 PM
peak hour trips per 1,000 sq. ft.
5. Trip rates for the Electric Pickle are derived from surveys collected at a Chicken N Pickle. Trip rates are 124.4 daily trips
per court, 4.6 AM peak hour trips per court, and 11.7 PM peak hour trips per court. See text for additional explanation.
6. Reductions calculated in Fehr & Peers Mainstreet MXD+ tool. Internal capture has an approximate 5% reduction and the
external walk, bike, and transit has an approximate 10% reduction. Methodology is consistent with that utilized in the
Empire Lakes Specific Plan EIR. Less reduction was applied to some categories based on engineering judgment
compared to MXD outputs.
7. A custom trip generation rate was applied to the project because it more closely matched the proposed use for the
Project compared to traditional ITE trip generation rates which do not exist for this land use type.
8. Live/work units were included in this assessment consistent with the original Empire Lakes Specific Plan EIR and previous
consistency memos prepared by Fehr and Peers.
As shown in Table 2, the proposed project was added to the existing and approved development
for the southern half of the Resort Specific Plan to create a comprehensive trip generation that
captures reductions from internalization that was developed consistent with the methodologies
Page 88
Tina Anderson May 9, 2024
Page 5 of 6
for the specific plan traffic assessment and consistent with previous consistency memorandums.
The comparison resulted in the area generating fewer daily, AM, and PM total trips compared to
what was estimated in the TIA for the southern portion of the Specific Plan area and for the entire
Specific Plan area as a whole. Therefore, the project is consistent with the findings from the TIA
and no additional assessment is required.
We hope this information is useful. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
to contact me directly at 949-308-6312.
Page 89
Tina Anderson May 9, 2024
Page 6 of 6
MXD Tool Inputs and Outputs
Page 90
Design Review Committee
Meeting Agenda
March 19, 2024
FINAL MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
6:00 p.m.
A.Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on March 19, 2024. The meeting was called to order
by Jennifer Nakamura, Staff Coordinator, at 6:00 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Commissioners James Daniels and Vice Chair Al Boling.
Staff Present: Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Bond Mendez, Associate Planner.
B.Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 16, 2023.
Motion carried 2-0 vote to adopt the minutes as presented.
D.Project Review Items
D1. DESIGN REVIEW – ELECTRIC PICKLE - A request to construct a 14,678 square-foot building for a
restaurant/bar with outdoor patio dining; 10 pickle-ball courts; and a 1,771 square-foot building with a coffee
bar, restrooms, and storage within the Urban Neighborhood General Plan designation and The Resort
Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Resort Parkway - APN: 0210-102-07 (Design
Review DRC2023-00248).
Staff presented the item to the Design Review Committee. Following staff’s presentation, the applicant, Paul
Frederick, gave background on the development of the project and how he has worked with Staff to provide
the proposed project as presented. The commissioners discussed the three design items as requested by
staff and provided input regarding the fencing and walls, the building elevations, and the shade structures.
Regarding fencing and walls, both commissioners agreed that the placement of the solid walls would be
supported and encouraged to reduce noise from the site and use of the outdoor stage. They also agreed
that the wall with the water fountain feature would be supported as a positive design element. The
commissioners discussed the building elevations, particularly the west elevations of both buildings as both
have less articulation to break up the overall massing. After additional discussion, the conceptual landscape
plan was determined sufficient to help break up the massing in consideration of tree placement, and the
distance of the smaller building to Cleveland Avenue would not make the massing seem as prominent. The
commissioners appreciated the applicant’s response to Staff’s comment requesting shade structures in the
outdoor recreational area. They agreed that the inclusion of shade structures over the courtside seating
areas would be a positive design element for the outdoor use.
Exhibit C
Page 91
Vice Chair Boling asked about the location of the on-site bike racks and Staff clarified the location had been
revised from being placed the street frontage between the east parking lot and the primary structure. He
expressed his appreciation of the change as the effort is to reduce potential for theft of personal property.
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
D2. DESIGN REVIEW – FOOTHILL LOFTS, LLC – A request to construct a mixed-use development
comprising 385 residential units and 6,216 square feet of commercial lease area on approximately 8.41 acres
of land at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Elm Avenue. The project area has a General Plan
land use designation of City Corridor – High. APN: 0208-961-05, -06, and -07 (Design Review DRC2022-
00162).
Staff presented the item to the Design Review Committee. Following staff’s presentation, members of the
applicant team (Foothill Lofts, LLC), including their architect and legal counsel, gave additional background
and detail on the project. Following the presentation and the applicant’s initial sharing of additional detail,
discussion ensued over various aspects of the project.
Staff sought the Design Review Committee’s recommendation on differing iterations between city staff and
the applicant on Class IV bicycle improvements along the project’s Foothill Boulevard frontage wherein staff
recommended a 7-foot bike lane and 4 foot raised median, and the applicant proposed a 5-foot bike lane
and 4-foot raised median. Notably, staff’s recommendation necessitates improvements to the center median
within Foothill Boulevard, whereas the applicant’s proposal involves no such improvements to the center
median.
At the meeting, staff sought feedback from the committee in the following areas: 1) Did the DRC prefer a 9-
foot or 11-foot frontage configuration area; 2) a preference on the bicycle median configuration
(bollards/raised/movable planters); and 3) whether the committee members recommend prioritizing the width
of the bicycle lane or width of the bicycle median. After much discussion, the committee members were
comfortable with a 9-foot frontage configuration area, a preference for a raised median, and the prioritization
of the width of the bicycle lane over the width of the bicycle median.
Aside from this topic, committee members also brought up various topics such as the location of the dog
park, the linear roof line, and a preference for another material other than perforated metal where it occurs
throughout. Committee members also expressed that the project seemed to provide fewer amenity spaces
when compared to other recent projects. In response, the applicant and their architect highlighted the
“Southern California Contemporary” design theme and explained how these design elements are all intended
to work together, providing a linear design aesthetic throughout. Regarding the dog park, the applicant cited
site constraints for the reason of the location of the dog park. Lastly, in response to the perceived lack of
amenities, the applicant cited market trends.
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
E. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Page 92
RESOLUTION NO. 24-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2023-00248, A
REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT TWO COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 13,845
SQUARE-FEET WITHIN THE MIXED USE PLACETYPE OF THE RESORT
SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET
AND RESORT PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF –
APN: 0210-102-07.
A.Recitals.
1. The applicant, Paul Frederick c/o Electric Pickle, filed an application for the approval of
Design Review DRC2023-00248 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 22nd day of May 2024 the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearings on May 22, 2024, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a property generally located on the north side of 4th
Street between Resort Parkway and Cleveland Avenue; and
b.The project site is located on the north side of 4th Street between Resort Parkway
and Cleveland Avenue. The site is comprised of one (1) vacant parcel. The project site is
rectangular in shape, with frontage (width) of about 331 feet along 4th Street and a depth of
approximately 340 feet north to south. The frontage along 4th Street is currently improved with
sidewalk, landscaping, curb and gutter; and
c.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit D
Page 93
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-16
DRC2023-00248– ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 2
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
North Multi-Family
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
South City of Ontario Urban Commercial Ontario Center Specific
Plan
East Multi-Family
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan,
Planning Area 1A
West Office/Business Park 21st Century
Employment
Mixed Employment 2
(ME2)
d. The two buildings in total are 13,845 square feet. Building 1 measures 12,074.50
square feet and is located in the center of the site. Building 2 measures 1,771.50 square feet and is
located at the southeast corner of the site. The site will be accessed via a single driveway from
Resort Parkway.; and
e. The buildings will have an industrial architectural style including standing seam metal
paneling painted with a palette of two colors including dark bronze and slate gray. The buildings will
include Hardie siding panels in an evening blue color finish, and Indiana limestone veneer accents
at various locations. Other than the south elevations for both buildings, which include the outdoor
dining on the primary building and walk-up window on the secondary building, there is limited
articulation designed throughout the wall planes in order to maximize the efficiency of the interior
space and accommodate the back-of-house uses. However, this limited articulation does not result
in an overwhelming building mass, as trellis projections aide in breaking up the building façades.
Additionally, the application of glass panels along the building’s rear elevations, which is mostly
visible from the parking lot and property to the north, adds architectural interest to the wall planes;
and
f. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking
setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table:
Development Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height Max. 60’ 30’ YES
Floor Area Max 35,000 13,845 YES
Resort Parkway ROW Min. 5’ 5’ YES
4th Street ROW Min. 10’ 10’ YES
PA1A Boundary Setback from Cleveland
Avenue Min. 10’ 10’ YES
Setback from Interior Property Line 0’ 134’ YES
Page 94
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-16
DRC2023-00248– ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 3
g. Pursuant to the Specific Plan, non-residential development is subject to the
minimum parking requirements set forth within the Development Code. Per Section 17.64 Parking
and Loading Standards, table 17.64.050-1, required minimum parking for the project is 10 spaces
for every 1,000 square feet of restaurant use. The Development Code allows for floor areas to be
deducted from the gross square footage for parking requirement calculations. The floor area
deducted includes areas such as hallways, storage of materials and equipment, automated
equipment related to operations, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, elevators, bathrooms, employee
only rooms, etc. Based on these calculations, building 1 will require 99 parking stalls and building 2
will require 9 parking stalls. Therefore, the project will require a total of 108 vehicle parking stalls.
The project provides 139 stalls, exceeding the parking requirement.The following table breaks down
the parking calculation:
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The General Plan
land use designation for the overall Master Plan area is Mixed Use. The overall Master Plan
area will provide a mix of land uses, though does not require each parcel within the Master Plan
area to have a mix of land uses. The proposed project is for the development of 867 for-rent
apartments and 5,000 square feet of live/work commercial space, which is is part of a larger
Mixed-Use development; and
b. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of the Development Co de and
the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The land use that would be associated with
this project is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the
expectations of the community. The zoning of the property is Mixed Use (MU), Resort South
Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, which permits the construction of commercial structures. The
proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Resort South Specific
Plan, and Placetype S-19, in which it is located; and
c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the
Development Code and the Resort South Specific Plan, including building setbacks, landscaping,
floor areas, parking, site planning, and architecture; and
Building Gross
Square Feet
Deducted
Square Feet
Adjusted Square
Feet
# of
Spaces
Required
Restaurant / Bar 12,074.5
2223.5 9,851 99
Coffee / Breakfast
Bar
1,770.5
859.5
911 9
Total 10,762 108
Page 95
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-16
DRC2023-00248– ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 4
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent
with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The
zoning of the property and surrounding properties are within the Resort South Specific Plan and
Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) zones.
4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015041083) on May 18, 2016, in connection with the
City’s approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with
subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. The Planning Commission finds that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based
upon the findings as follows:
a. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required,
Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated May 9, 2024, was prepared by T & B
Planning (Exhibit B). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the
scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above and no
additional environmental review is required in connection with the City’s consideration of Design
Review DRC2023-00248. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the
project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in
the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed the effects of the proposed project.
Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or
different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less
than significant.
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning and Economic Development Department’s
determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff’s
determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby approves the project subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF MAY 2024.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Tony Morales, Chairman
Page 96
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-16
DRC2023-00248– ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 5
ATTEST:
Matt Marquez, Secretary
I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of May 2024, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 97
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The Design Review authorizes the construction of two commercial buildings totaling approximately
13,845 square feet. Building 1 measures approximately 12,074.50 square feet and is located in the
center of the site. Building 2 measures approximately 1,770.50 square feet and is located at the
southeast corner of the site. The larger building is the primary structure proposed to include a
restaurant, bar, and outdoor dining. It also includes a small retail “pro shop” and indoor golfing range
simulation for recreation.
1.
The trash enclosure shall incorporate a roof and shall be architecturally compatible with the primary
structure(s). Include the design with the plan check submittal.
2.
Include outdoor courtside covered seating structures in the plan check submittal. The covered shade
structures shall be architecturally compatible with the primary structure(s).
3.
Include a landscaping plan that identifies tiered landscaping where applicable with the Resort Specific
Plan section 8.5.2.F and provide a plant list consistent with the permitted plant list in the Specific Plan.
4.
In the plan check submittal provide a photometric lighting plan which includes light standards and fixture
detail sufficient to determine shielding and lighting requirements in compliance with Development Code
Section 17.58 and CPTED. Exterior lighting shall be LED and Full Cutoff fixtures to the maximum extent
possible.
5.
The site plans shall reflect the current accurate lot lines of the property. Perimeter fencing along the north
and west property lines shall not be installed on adjacent property. If a Lot Line Adjustment is proposed
between adjacent property to the north, it shall be approved and recorded prior to installation of fencing.
6.
Grading Plans and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) shall be approved prior to any on-site or
off-site improvements.
7.
A Planning final inspection is required prior to a Building final.8.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State
Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances.
9.
Cameras shall be installed which cover the interior and exterior of the business, with the intent to
capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic
approaching the business. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or commence of use related to
the requested entitlement, the applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an
inspection of the security cameras.
Video recordings from surveillance cameras shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of
704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept.
10.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 98
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Standard Conditions of Approval
11.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by
the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall
be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check,
request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.
Page 99
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures)
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
12.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
13.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
14.
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 100
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections
shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted
mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent
nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted
mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included
in building plans.
16.
For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the
continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the
public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in
healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any
damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of
damage.
17.
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
18.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
19.
A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within
commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.
20.
21. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
22.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval
prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics
of the selected tree species.
23.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per
30 linear feet of building.
24.
All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design
shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 101
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient
landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
26.
27. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.
All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb
stop).
28
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and
exits shall be striped per City standards.
29
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any
signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate
application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs.
30.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
31.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
32.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations,
and the Resort Specific Plan.
33.
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
34.
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
35.
A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles,
free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the
architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
36.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
37.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 102
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
38
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
39.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has
commenced, whichever comes first.
40.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
41.
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
42
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from
the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
1.
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
2.
Any required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the
developer until accepted by the City.
3.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 103
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
If not already completed, a signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate
Landscape and Lighting Districts and /or Community Facility Districts shall be filed with the Engineering
Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the
developer.
4.
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a
permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all
improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure
or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of
completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined
by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In
no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources
prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval.
5.
Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical
distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution
facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements
and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development.
6.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.7.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
8.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of
the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
9.
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been
issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior
to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
10.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Gas detection is required in accordance with the Fire Code.1.
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
2.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 104
Project #: DRC2023-00248
Project Name: Electric Pickle Rancho Cucamonga
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire suppression systems are required to be monitored in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-4
and Standard 9-5. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
3.
Commercial cooking operations are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 6-1. A
copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
4.
A suppression system is required to protect the exhaust duct, the hood, and the grease producing
appliances.
5.
Commercial cooking suppression systems are required to be electrically supervised (monitored) in
accordance with Fire District Standard 9-4 and Standard 9-5. Copies of the Standards have been
uploaded to the Documents section.
6.
Emergency responder communication coverage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-12 is
required for the building (s) included in this project. A radio signal strength test of the public safety radio
communication system conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 2022 California Fire
Code is required to be submitted. Where existing radio signal strength does not meet the requirements
of the Fire Code, a separate submittal for an emergency responder communication coverage system is
required.
7.
Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
8.
New and existing insulated liquid carbon dioxide systems with more than 100 pounds of carbon dioxide
used in beverage dispensing applications are required to have a gas detection system installed in
accordance with the Fire Code.
9.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
10.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
11.
A suppression system that meets the design, installation, and operating provisions of Chapter 9 of the
Fire Code and Fire District Standard 9-4 is required to be installed to protect commercial cooking
operations. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section .
12.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
13.
Fire access gates are required in the perimeter fencing to allow for hose pulls that meet Fire Code
standards.
14.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 8Printed: 5/15/2024
Page 105
RESOLUTION NO. 24-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2024-00151, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT AND BAR WITH
FULL ALCOHOL SERVICE (DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONTROL TYPE 47 LICENSE) WITHIN A PROPOSED 12,074 COMMERCIAL
BUILDING AND TO ESTABLISH OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL COURTS AT THE
SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE MIXED USE PLACETYPE OF THE RESORT
SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET
AND RESORT PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF –
APN: 0210-102-07.
A.Recitals.
1.The Applicant, Paul Frederick c/o Electric Pickle, filed an application for Conditional
Use Permit DRC2024-00151, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 22nd day of May 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 22, 2024, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a property generally located on the north side of 4th
Street between Resort Parkway and Cleveland Avenue; and
b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit E
Page 106
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-17
DRC2024-00151 ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The use is consistent with the general plan designation. The site is within the Mixed
Use Placetype within the Mixed Use Infill (PA1A) designation. PA1A is planned as a mixed use
village, providing a range of opportunities for a variety of living, recreational, and working settings.
This village is surrounded by regional shopping, medium- to high-density residential, a range of
large-format commercial and industrial employers, and various community services and amenities
The proposed uses contribute to the commercial and recreational uses provided within PA1A.
The use is consistent with the general plan.
b. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and purposes
of the applicable zone as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations and standards.
A restaurant with full alcohol service, and outdoor recreational courts, are allowed uses in the
Mixed Use (MU) Placetype upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The uses are
consistent with the zoning designation and Development Code and specific plan in that the uses
are expected as they fulfill the variety of uses with the village environment which is consistent with
the current development pattern of the Specific Plan. Neither the Development Code nor the
Specific Plan have any specific regulations or standards to apply to the operations of a restaurant
with full alcohol service or outdoor recreational courts. However, included conditions of approval
mitigate any potential impacts by regulating noise, hours of operation, and use of the site.
c. The site is suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use. The site is
currently vacant but is proposed to be developed under a separate entitlement (Design Review
DRC2023-00248) and will be improved with a commercial building specifically for the restaurant
and bar, outdoor space dedicated to the recreational courts, and access and circulation, parking,
structures, utilities, and landscaping. The uses are similar in intensity to existing uses in the
immediate surrounding area. No physical constraints have been proposed that may impede the
operation of the existing surrounding land use nor the proposed land use. Therefore, the project
site is well-suited for the use.
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the use would be
compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including restaurant uses and
outdoor recreational facilities. The restaurant and bar will operate primarily within a commercial
building, the recreational courts are interior to the site and enclosed with fencing, and will not
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan, Planning
Area 1A
North Multi-Family
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan, Planning
Area 1A
South City of Ontario Urban Commercial Ontario Center Specific Plan
East Multi-Family
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
The Resort Specific Plan, Planning
Area 1A
West Office/Business Park 21st Century
Employment Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
Page 107
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-17
DRC2024-00151 ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 3
operate beyond the project parcel nor onto the property of adjacent similar uses. The intensity of
the use is not expected to exceed the intensity of adjacent similar uses.
e. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the
vicinity in which the project is located. The scale and operation of the use is similar to adjacent
uses and will not negatively impact the normal operations of any of these surrounding uses. The
use has been conditioned to meet performance criteria, safety standards, maintenance standards
and all other Municipal Code standards to mitigate any potential impact related to the restaurant
and bar, and outdoor recreational facility.
f. The use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire,
streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service
due to the use. The use does not authorize any operations which may result in additional service
requests from Fire or Police that are not normally associated with similar adjacent existing uses.
4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015041083) on May 18, 2016, in connection with
the City’s approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with
subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. The Planning Commission finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment
based upon the findings as follows:
a. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required,
Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated May 9, 2024, was prepared by T & B
Planning (Exhibit B). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within
the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above
and no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City’s consideration of
Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00151. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances
surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than
those evaluated in the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed the effects of
the proposed project. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and
that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the
project to a level of less than significant.
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning and Economic Development Department’s
determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgement, concurs in the staff
determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Page 108
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24-17
DRC2024-00151 ELECTRIC PICKLE
MAY 22, 2024
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF MAY 2024.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matt Marquez, Secretary
I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of May 2024, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 109
www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/8/2024
Project #: DRC2024-00151
Project Name: Electric Pickle
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. The Conditional Use Permit authorizes the operation of a restaurant with full liquor service (Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 47 License) within a proposed 12,074 commercial building, and to establish
outdoor recreational courts at the site within the mixed use placetype of the Resort Specific Plan located
at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Resort Parkway; APN: 0210-102-07.
2. The CUP authorizes hours of operation for the restaurant daily from 11 :00 am - 11:00 pm. The CUP also
authorizes 9 pickleball courts and 2 bocce ball courts. The courts are accessible for use from 6:00 am - 10:00
pm.
3. The Conditional Use Permit does not authorize live entertainment. Any entertainment use on the property
is limited to the Entertainment Permit exceptions as outlined in the Development Code section 17.16.170.C.
4. The Conditional Use Permit is not the alcohol license. The applicant shall apply for the Type 47 license
with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and shall comply with all permit and license requirements.
5. The use of the restaurant and outdoor recreational courts is subject to the Noise regulations set forth in
the Development Code section 17.66.050.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal’s
regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances.
7. Cameras shall be installed which cover the interior and exterior of the business, with the intent to capture digital
images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business.
Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or commence of use related to the requested entitlement, the applicant
shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security cameras.
Video recordings from surveillance cameras shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480
resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept.
8. All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD)
Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired.
9. Any entertainment proposed to be conducted as part of the operation of the business shall be in compliance with
these conditions of approval and comply with Development Code Section 17.16.170.C. Any entertainment
proposed which is not consistent with this code section shall require an entertainment permit and additional
conditions may be imposed at the time any such entertainment permit is issued.
10. The operations shall not cause noise or other nuisances which is, or which may be, detrimental to public health,
safety, or welfare and shall comply with all relevant noise provisions in the Development Code, as may be
occasionally amended by the City Council.
Page 110
www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/8/2024
11. Alcohol sales and service shall cease 30 minutes prior to the close of business.
12. No entertainment, either live or recorded, is permitted in any patio area at any time. This includes the use of
musical devices, instruments, and speakers.
Standard Conditions of Approval
13. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided
by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check,
request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.
Page 111
Project #: DRC2024-00151
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 4 Printed: 5/8/2024
Project Name: Electric Pickle
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
14. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims,
demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable,
declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but
not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively “Actions”), brought against
the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities
thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit
or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments,
agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or
concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085
or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision
of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and
expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident
to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City
Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and
satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such
suit, action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that
the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the
City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City
shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging
the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the
litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into
an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information
only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be wet
sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
16. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
Page 112
Project #: DRC2024-00151
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 4 Printed: 5/8/2024
Project Name: Electric Pickle
Location: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY 1011 - 021010290-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
17. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business
including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the
use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction;
and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use
Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for
plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license.
The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of
an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City.
Page 113
Page 1
2
3
5
3
DATE:May 22, 2024
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
Deborah Allen, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Major Projects Program for
Fiscal Year 2024/25.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 24-013 which finds the Major Projects
Program for Fiscal Year 2024/25 in conformance with the General Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Government Code Section 65401 requires that the City Council adopt a Major Projects Program (MPP) outlining
the anticipated major improvement projects for the upcoming fiscal year. Furthermore, the Planning Commission
is required to find the MPP is in conformance with the General Plan. To demonstrate conformance with the
General Plan, an index sheet is provided showing each project and its applicable General Plan policy(s) (Exhibit
A). The MPP is a vital piece of the City’s annual budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any
given year. The MPP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City
budgets for funded projects that will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the MPP
addresses both the City’s long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the vision of the
community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs.
ANALYSIS:
The MPP Summary Index has been categorized by project type, corresponding Department, and project names
are in alphabetical order within each section. Individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, and year
funded (Exhibit B). The Resolution will find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2024/25, in
conformity with the adopted General Plan Goals and Policies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure I, Gas Tax, and
state grants. The MPP for Fiscal Year 2024-25 proposes 60 projects, totaling just over $80,824,210 to be
executed in the upcoming fiscal year. In addition, there are 23 projects totaling just over $62,577,980 identified
in future years.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The City’s Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically
feasible MPP that embodies the City’s public infrastructure needs. This item addresses the City Council’s vision
for the City by ensuring the construction of high-quality public improvements that promote a world-class
community and also support the City Council’s Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
Page 114
Page 2
2
3
5
3
community for all.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Major Project Program Summary Index
Exhibit B - MPP Project Sheets
Exhibit C - General Plan Goals and Policies
Exhibit D - Resolution
Page 115
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT A
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
DRAINAGE
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
Project Total:$ -$-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$-
Drainage Totals:$ -$-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$-
FACILITIES
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
1 PF-1.1
PF-4.1 Veronica Fincher Animal Center Animal Center Office Reconfigure $ 200,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 1 125 104 5602
Project Total:$ 200,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000
2 LC-3.3
LC-6.6
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign $ 3,528,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,528,000 1 025 001 5650 1894025-0
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office
Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign (anticipated
increase)$ -$-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$-030 1894030-0
Project Total:$ 3,528,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,528,000
3 PF-1.1 Mike Parmer City Manager's Office EOC Relocation $ -$ 88,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 88,000 017 5650 1348017-0
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office EOC Relocation $ 65,000 $-$ 7,500,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,565,000 288 5650 1348288-0
Project Total:$ 65,000 $ 88,000 $ 7,500,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,653,000
4 PF-1.1
PF-1.4 Mike Parmer City Manager's Office RCPD Facility Improvement and Modernization $ 65,000 $ 5,688,430 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,753,430 1 017 5650 1348017-0
Project Total:$ 65,000 $ 5,688,430 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,753,430
5 PF-1.1
PF-1.4 Andy Miller Community Services RC Family Resource Center Rehabilitation $ 156,930 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 156,930 1 119 5650 2107119-0
Andy Miller Community Services RC Family Resource Center Rehabilitation $ -$ 775,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 775,000 1 025 5650 2107025-0
Project Total:$ 156,930 $ 775,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 931,930
6 PF-1.1
PF-1.4
Darci Vogel Fire District 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178 (Phase 2)$ 788,740 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 788,740 288 1645 1645288-0
Darci Vogel Fire District 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178 (Phase 2)$ 300,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000 025 1645 1645025-0
Darci Vogel Fire District 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178 (Phase 2)$ 3,200,000 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,200,000 274 1645 1645274-0
Project Total:$ 4,288,740 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,288,740
7 PF-1.1
PF-1.4
Darci Vogel Fire District Amethyst Fire Station 171 Rebuild $ 401,460 $-$ 18,885,310 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,286,770 3 288 501 5650 2090288-0
Darci Vogel Fire District Amethyst Fire Station 171 Rebuild $ -$-$ 100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000 1 290 603 5650 2090290-0
Project Total:$ 401,460 $-$ 18,985,310 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,386,770
8 PF-1.1 Ty Harris Fire District Banyan Fire Station 175 - ADA Improvements $ 58,290 $ 553,300 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,590 3 288 501 5650 2111288-0
Project Total:$ 58,290 $ 553,300 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,590
9 PF-1.1 Ty Harris Fire District Day Creek Fire Station 173 - ADA Improvements $ 55,090 $ 438,370 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 493,460 3 288 501 5650 2093288-0
Project Total:$ 55,090 $ 438,370 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 493,460
10 PF-1.1 Ty Harris Fire District Jersey Fire Station 174 - ADA Improvements $ 55,090 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,090 3 288 501 5650 2092288-0
Ty Harris Fire District Jersey Fire Station 174 - ADA Improvements $ -$ 647,920 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 647,920 1 282 501 5650 2092282-0
Project Total:$ 55,090 $ 647,920 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 703,010
11 PF-1.1
PF-1.4
Darci Vogel Fire District Town Center Station 178 (Phase 1)$ 22,006,800 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22,006,800 3 288 501 5650 1645288-0
Darci Vogel Fire District Town Center Station 178 (Phase 1)$ 472,010 $-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 472,010 1 025 001 5650 1645025-0
Page 116
Darci Vogel Fire District Town Center Station 178 (Phase 1)$63,610 $-$-$-$-$-$-$63,610 1 290 603 5650 1645290-0
Project Total:$22,542,420 $-$-$-$-$-$-$22,542,420
12
LC-1.1
PF-1.1
PF-1.4
Cara Vera Library Archibald Library Replacement Project $926,400 $12,073,600 $-$-$-$-$-$13,000,000 1 329 601 5650 2114329-0
Cara Vera Library Archibald Library Replacement Project $-$4,635,690 $-$-$-$-$-$4,635,690 1 030 5650 2114030-0
Cara Vera Library Archibald Library Replacement Project $-$5,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$5,000,000 1 TBD 5650 2114-0
Project Total:$926,400 $21,709,290 $-$-$-$-$-$22,635,690
13 PF-1.1 Wess Garcia Library Paul A. Biane Library Infrastructure Project $585,170 $414,830 $200,000 $-$-$-$-$1,200,000 1 329 601 5650 2115329-0
Project Total:$585,170 $414,830 $200,000 $-$-$-$-$1,200,000
14 PF-1.4 Richard Favela Public Works Above Ground Diesel Tank Replacement $-$250,000 $-$-$-$-$-$250,000 1 025 5603
Project Total:$-$250,000 $-$-$-$-$-$250,000
15 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works Central Park Courtyard Improvements $-$-$532,000 $-$-$-$-$532,000 1 025 5602
Project Total:$-$-$532,000 $-$-$-$-$532,000
16 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works Citywide - HVAC & Lighting Controls $137,000 $1,652,000 $1,767,000 $2,042,000 $1,826,000 $1,936,000 $-$9,360,000 1 025 303 5650 1978025-0
Project Total:$137,000 $1,652,000 $1,767,000 $2,042,000 $1,826,000 $1,936,000 $-$9,360,000
17 PF-1.1
RC-7.13
Andy Miller Public Works Citywide & Fire District Access Control Upgrade $466,750 $280,480 $-$-$-$-$-$747,230 1 025 5602
Andy Miller Public Works Citywide & Fire District Access Control Upgrade $-$123,720 $-$-$-$-$-$123,720 1 288 5602
Project Total:$466,750 $404,200 $-$-$-$-$-$870,950
18 PF-1.4 Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting Upgrade Program N/A $450,000 $-$-$-$-$-$450,000 1 139 5650 2170139-0
Project Total:$-$450,000 $-$-$-$-$-$450,000
19 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Sewer Line Replacement $-$900,000 $-$-$-$-$-$900,000 1 025 5602
Project Total:$-$900,000 $-$-$-$-$-$900,000
20 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Waterproofing and Roof Repairs $186,230 $2,048,530 $-$-$-$-$-$2,234,760 1 025 001 5602 1025025-0
Project Total:$186,230 $2,048,530 $-$-$-$-$-$2,234,760
21 RC-7.1 Andy Miller Public Works Corporate Yard EV Charging Stations $30,000 $550,000 $-$-$-$-$-$580,000 1 025 5602
Project Total:$30,000 $550,000 $-$-$-$-$-$580,000
22 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works Council Chambers - Carpeting & Seating Replacement $12,500 $150,000 $-$-$-$-$-$162,500 1 025 303 5602
Project Total:$12,500 $150,000 $-$-$-$-$-$162,500
23 OS-1.4
Tony Casillas Public Works Quakes Stadium Upgrades $-$2,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$2,000,000 1 025 5650 2168025-0
Tony Casillas Public Works Quakes Stadium Upgrades $-$2,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$2,000,000 030 5650 2168030-0
Tony Casillas Public Works Quakes Stadium Upgrades $-$1,190,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,190,000 120 5650 2168120-0
Project Total:$-$5,190,000 $-$-$-$-$-$5,190,000
24 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Public Works RC Sports Center Sewer Line Improvement $-$480,000 $-$-$-$-$-$480,000 1 025 5602
Project Total:$-$480,000 $-$-$-$-$-$480,000
Facilities Totals:$33,760,070 $42,389,870 $28,984,310 $2,042,000 $1,826,000 $1,936,000 $-$110,938,250
MISCELLANEOUS
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
25 S-1.8
S-3-7 Mike Parmer City Manager's Office Wildfire Early Detection System $-$1,900,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,900,000 1 274 208 5650 2122274-0
Project Total:$-$1,900,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,900,000
Miscellaneous Totals:$-$1,900,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,900,000
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
11 PF-1.1
PF-1.4
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT B
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
Page 117
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
26 PF-7.1 Fred Lyn Engineering RC Fiber Extension - Amethyst Avenue $-$-$80,000 $-$-$-$-$80,000 3 288 501 5650 2096288-0
Fred Lyn Engineering RC Fiber Extension - Amethyst Avenue $-$-$80,000 $-$-$-$-$80,000 1 711 303 5650 2096705-0
Project Total:$-$-$160,000 $-$-$-$-$160,000
27 PF-7.1
PF-7.2 Fred Lyn Engineering RCMU Electric Substation - Southeast $-$15,000 $30,000 $13,000,000 $-$-$-$13,045,000 1 705 303 5650 2170705-0
Project Total:$-$15,000 $30,000 $13,000,000 $-$-$-$13,045,000
28 RC-7.1 Deborah Allen Engineering RCMU EV Charging Station Hub $942,075 $293,350 $-$-$-$-$-$1,235,425 1 705 303 5650 2095705-0
Project Total:$942,075 $293,350 $-$-$-$-$-$1,235,425
29 PF-7.1 Fred Lyn Engineering RCMU Line Extension - Etiwanda North Phase 2 $1,697,090 $2,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$3,697,090 1 705 303 5650 2126705-0
Project Total:$1,697,090 $2,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$3,697,090
30 PF-7.1
PF-7.2 Fred Lyn Engineering
RCMU Line Extension - Milliken Ave South of Jersey
Blvd $-$800,000 $-$800,000 $-$-$-$1,600,000 1 705 303 5650 1910705-0
Project Total:$-$800,000 $-$800,000 $-$-$-$1,600,000
31 PF-7.1
PF-7.2
Fred Lyn Engineering The Resort Parkway North - RCMU Distribution $-$17,000 $25,000 $17,000 $25,000 $-$-$84,000 1 705 303 5650 2037705-0
Fred Lyn Engineering The Resort Parkway North - RCMU Distribution $-$3,000 $5,000 $3,000 $5,000 $-$-$16,000 1 711 303 5650 2037711-0
Project Total:$-$20,000 $30,000 $20,000 $30,000 $-$-$100,000
Municipal Utilities Totals:$2,639,165 $3,128,350 $220,000 $13,820,000 $30,000 $-$-$19,837,515
PARKS & RECREATION
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
32 OS-2.2
OS-2.3
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead $-$1,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,000,000 1 275 208 5650 2091275-0
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead $-$808,400 $-$-$-$-$-$808,400 1 120 401 5650 2091120-0
Mike Parmer City Manager's Office Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead $200,000 $-$-$-$-$-$-$200,000 3 288 501 5650 2091288-0
Project Total:$200,000 $1,808,400 $-$-$-$-$-$2,008,400
33 OS-1.3
Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground $62,520 $-$-$-$-$-$-$62,520 1 141 303 5607 2141141-0
Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground $26,910 $-$-$-$-$-$-$26,910 1 120 401 5607 2141120-0
Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground $899,290 $-$-$-$-$-$-$899,290 1 119 401 5607 2141119-0
Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground $286,750 $-$-$-$-$-$-$286,750 1 274 208 5607 2141274-0
Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground $35,000 $-$-$-$-$-$-$35,000 1 174 303 5607 2141174-0
Project Total:$1,310,470 $-$-$-$-$-$-$1,310,470
34 OS-2.1
MA-3.1
Cesar Guevara Engineering Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail $45,139 $42,250 $-$75,026 $-$-$-$162,415 1 214 303 5650 1533214-0
Cesar Guevara Engineering Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail $24,306 $22,750 $-$100,000 $-$-$-$147,056 1 105 208 5650 1533105-0
Cesar Guevara Engineering Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail $-$-$-$644,000 $-$-$-$644,000 TBD
Project Total:$69,445 $65,000 $-$819,026 $-$-$-$953,471
35 OS-2.1
MA-3.1
Chi Chan Engineering Day Creek Channel Bike Trail $320,160 $-$-$-$-$-$-$320,160 1 105 208 5650 2014105-0
Chi Chan Engineering Day Creek Channel Bike Trail $510,250 $-$-$-$-$-$-$510,250 1 214 303 5650 2014214-0
Chi Chan Engineering Day Creek Channel Bike Trail $79,610 $-$-$-$-$-$-$79,610 1 177 2014177-0
Chi Chan Engineering Day Creek Channel Bike Trail $42,730 $-$-$-$-$-$-$42,730 1 198 2014198-0
Chi Chan Engineering Day Creek Channel Bike Trail $65,560 $-$-$-$-$-$-$65,560 1 176 2014176-0
Project Total:$1,018,310 $-$-$-$-$-$-$1,018,310
36 OS-2.4
Krystal Lai Engineering Heritage Park Bridge Replacements $108,109 $-$-$-$-$-$-$108,109 1 848 303 5650 1963848-0
Krystal Lai Engineering Heritage Park Bridge Replacements $20,035 $-$-$-$-$-$-$20,035 1 847 303 5650 1963847-0
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT B
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
Page 118
Krystal Lai Engineering Heritage Park Bridge Replacements $224,583 $1,200,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,424,583 3 288 501 5650 1963288-0
Krystal Lai Engineering Heritage Park Bridge Replacements $157,273 $1,200,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,357,273 1 198 303 5650 1963198-0
Project Total:$510,000 $2,400,000 $-$-$-$-$-$2,910,000
37
OS-1.5
RC-7.13 Will McAllister Public Works Citywide Site Lighting Repairs and Upgrades Program N/A $356,460 $140,890 $130,000 $-$-$-$627,350 1 131 5650 2169131-0
Will McAllister Public Works Citywide Site Lighting Repairs and Upgrades Program N/A $55,200 $30,000 $56,400 $-$-$-$141,600 1 141 5650 2169141-0
Project Total:$-$411,660 $170,890 $186,400 $-$-$-$768,950
38 OS-1.4 Daniel Akers Public Works Day Creek Tennis Court Renovation $-$75,000 $-$-$-$-$-$75,000 1 140 5607
Project Total:$-$75,000 $-$-$-$-$-$75,000
39 OS-1.4 Sonny Rodriguez Public Works DG Trail Renovation on Victoria Park Lane $-$197,000 $-$-$-$-$-$197,000 1 131 5607
Project Total:$-$197,000 $-$-$-$-$-$197,000
40 OS-2.1 Richard Favela Public Works Heritage Park - Pedestrian Trail $-$252,740 $-$-$-$-$-$252,740 1 848 303 5607 1848848-0
Project Total:$-$252,740 $-$-$-$-$-$252,740
41 RC-2.5
Daniel Akers Public Works Irrigation Controllers Project $-$126,500 $-$-$-$-$-$126,500 1 136 5603
Daniel Akers Public Works Irrigation Controllers Project $-$109,250 $-$-$-$-$-$109,250 1 140 5603
Daniel Akers Public Works Irrigation Controllers Project $-$100,000 $-$-$-$-$-$100,000 1 141 5603
Daniel Akers Public Works Irrigation Controllers Project $-$68,250 $-$-$-$-$-$68,250 1 700 5603
Daniel Akers Public Works Irrigation Controllers Project $-$52,500 $-$-$-$-$-$52,500 1 847 5603
Project Total:$-$456,500 $-$-$-$-$-$456,500
42 OS-1.5 Daniel Akers Public Works LMD 2 Park Upgrades RIRE Grant $40,000 $210,000 $-$-$-$-$-$250,000 1 131 303 5650 2102131-0
Project Total:$40,000 $210,000 $-$-$-$-$-$250,000
43 OS-1.4 Daniel Akers Public Works Mountain View Park Playground Replacement $-$943,750 $-$-$-$-$-$943,750 1 134 5607
Project Total:$-$943,750 $-$-$-$-$-$943,750
44 RC-2.6
RC-7.13
Neil Plummer Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project $100,000 $100,000 $-$-$-$-$-$200,000 1 847 5650 2130847-0
Neil Plummer Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project $-$600,000 $-$-$-$-$-$600,000 1 848 5650 2130848-0
Neil Plummer Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project $-$500,000 $-$-$-$-$-$500,000 1 025 5650 2130025-0
Neil Plummer Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project $-$500,000 $-$-$-$-$-$500,000 1 120 5650 2130120-0
Project Total:$100,000 $1,700,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,800,000
45 RC-2.5
RC-2.6
Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Program N/A $275,000 $550,000 $500,000 $500,000 $-$-$1,825,000 1 131 5650 1787131-0
Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Program N/A $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $-$-$-$390,000 1 134 5650 1787134-0
Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Program N/A $50,000 $50,000 $-$-$-$-$100,000 1 136 5650 1787136-0
Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Program N/A $50,000 $-$-$-$-$-$50,000 1 141 5650 1787141-0
Project Total:$-$505,000 $730,000 $630,000 $500,000 $-$-$2,365,000
Parks & Recreation Totals:$3,248,225 $9,025,050 $900,890 $1,635,426 $500,000 $-$-$15,309,591
STREETS
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
46 MA-2.3
MA-3.2
Cesar Guevara Engineering 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing $54,000 $465,000 $2,000,000 $-$-$-$-$2,519,000 1 124 303 5650 1839124-0
Cesar Guevara Engineering 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing $-$-$1,000,000 $-$-$-$-$1,000,000 1 199 1839199-0
Cesar Guevara Engineering 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing $-$200,000 $-$-$-$-$-$200,000 1 705 303 5650 1839705-0
36 OS-2.4
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT B
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
Page 119
Project Total:$54,000 $665,000 $3,000,000 $-$-$-$-$3,719,000
47 MA-3.1 Sarine Hazarshahian Engineering 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Cycle Track $-$1,220,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,220,000 1 177 303 5650 2005177-0
Sarine Hazarshahian Engineering 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Cycle Track $488,220 $-$-$-$-$-$-$488,220 1 198 303 5650 2005198-0
Project Total:$488,220 $1,220,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,708,220
48 MA-2.1
MA-2.2 Romeo David Engineering Almond Street Extension Street Improvements $45,000 $120,000 $980,000 $-$-$-$-$1,145,000 1 198 303 5650 2101198-0
Project Total:$45,000 $120,000 $980,000 $-$-$-$-$1,145,000
49 MA-2.1
MA-2.3 Krystal Lai Engineering Civic Center Drive Crosswalk $-$225,000 $-$-$-$-$-$225,000 1 198 303 5650 2123198-0
Project Total:$-$225,000 $-$-$-$-$-$225,000
50
MA-2.3
MA-2.7
MA-3.2 Chi Chan Engineering Etiwanda East Side Widening $423,000 $1,370,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,793,000 1 124 303 5650 2002124-0
Project Total:$423,000 $1,370,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,793,000
51 MA-4.5
Jason Welday Engineering Etiwanda Grade Separation $23,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$-$23,000,000 1 181 303 5650 1922181-0
Jason Welday Engineering Etiwanda Grade Separation $3,535,000 $1,140,000 $-$-$-$-$-$4,675,000 198 303 5650 1922198-0
Jason Welday Engineering Etiwanda Grade Separation $-$-$26,000,000 $-$-$-$-$26,000,000 TBD
Jason Welday Engineering Etiwanda Grade Separation $-$-$94,000,000 $-$-$-$94,000,000 TBD
Project Total:$26,535,000 $1,140,000 $26,000,000 $94,000,000 $-$-$-$147,675,000
52 MA-2.1
MA-2.3
Cesar Guevara Engineering Haven Avenue Sidewalk $29,900 $197,292 $-$-$-$-$-$227,192 1 214 303 5650 1864214-0
Cesar Guevara Engineering Haven Avenue Sidewalk $16,100 $379,708 $-$-$-$-$-$395,808 1 105 208 5650 1864105-0
Project Total:$46,000 $577,000 $-$-$-$-$-$623,000
53 MA-3.4
S-1.5 Krystal Lai Engineering Hellman and Feron Storm Drain $-$226,940 $-$-$-$-$-$226,940 1 112 5650 2166112-0
Project Total:$-$226,940 $-$-$-$-$-$226,940
54 PF-1.4 Romeo David Engineering Local Streets Paving Program N/A $1,155,000 $655,000 $655,000 $655,000 $655,000 $-$3,775,000 1 174 303 5650 1022174-0
Romeo David Engineering Local Streets Paving Program N/A $3,500,000 $4,725,000 $4,725,000 $4,725,000 $4,725,000 $-$22,400,000 1 177 303 5650 1022177-0
Project Total:$-$4,655,000 $5,380,000 $5,380,000 $5,380,000 $5,380,000 $-$26,175,000
55 PF-1.4 Romeo David Engineering Major Arterial Paving Program N/A $3,500,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $-$19,820,000 1 179 5650 2097, 2099, 2100
Project Total:$-$3,500,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $4,080,000 $-$19,820,000
56 MA-2.9
PF-1.4
Romeo David Engineering West Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements $4,645,115 $-$-$-$-$-$-$4,645,115 1 198 303 5650 1964198-0
Romeo David Engineering West Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements $226,760 $-$-$-$-$-$-$226,760 124 303 5650 1964124-0
Romeo David Engineering West Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements $2,400,000 $-$-$-$-$-$-$2,400,000 274 303 5650 1964274-0
Project Total:$7,271,875 $-$-$-$-$-$-$7,271,875
57 PF-1.4
Richard Favela Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program N/A $475,000 $500,000 $550,000 $600,000 $650,000 $-$2,775,000 1 001 xxx 5650 1991001-0
Richard Favela Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program N/A $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $-$500,000 1 177 303 5650 1991177-0
Richard Favela Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program N/A $150,000 $-$-$-$-$-$150,000 1 174 303 5650 1991198-0
Richard Favela Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program N/A $250,000 $-$-$-$-$-$250,000 1 131 1991131-0
Richard Favela Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program N/A $400,000 $-$-$-$-$-$400,000 1 134 1991134-0
Project Total:$-$1,375,000 $600,000 $650,000 $700,000 $750,000 $-$4,075,000
Streets Totals:$34,863,095 $15,073,940 $40,040,000 $104,110,000 $10,160,000 $10,210,000 $-$214,457,035
TRAFFIC
No. GP PM Department Project Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost Entity Fund Division Object JL
58 MA-5.4
Krystal Lai Engineering Advanced Traffic Management System-Phase 2 $887,825 $7,925,260 $-$-$-$-$-$8,813,085 1 124 303 5650 2004124-0
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT B
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
Page 120
Krystal Lai Engineering Advanced Traffic Management System-Phase 2 $-$80,870 $-$-$-$-$-$80,870 1 288 501 5650 2004288-0
Krystal Lai Engineering Advanced Traffic Management System-Phase 2 $-$80,870 $-$-$-$-$-$80,870 1 711 501 5650 2004288-0
Krystal Lai Engineering Advanced Traffic Management System-Phase 2 $-$1,000,000 $-$-$-$-$-$1,000,000 1 275 2004275-0
Project Total:$887,825 $9,087,000 $-$-$-$-$-$9,974,825
59 PF-1.4 Richard Favela Public Works Traffic Signal Modification Program N/A $220,000 $242,000 $266,200 $266,200 $292,820 $-$1,287,220 1 174 303 5650 2035174-0
Project Total:$-$220,000 $242,000 $266,200 $266,200 $292,820 $-$1,287,220
60 PF-1.4 Richard Favela Public Works TS Signal Battery Backup Replacement Program N/A $-$154,275 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $-$664,275 1 174 303 5650 1980174-0
Richard Favela Public Works TS Signal Battery Backup Replacement Program N/A $-$165,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $-$765,000 1 712 303 5650 1980712-0
Project Total:$-$-$319,275 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $-$1,429,275
Traffic Totals:$887,825 $9,307,000 $561,275 $636,200 $636,200 $662,820 $-$12,691,320
CITYWIDE TOTALS $75,398,380 $80,824,210 $70,706,475 $122,243,626 $13,152,200 $12,808,820 $-$375,133,711
58 MA-5.4
INDEX SHEET EXHIBIT B
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Project
No.
General
Plan
Reference
Project Manager Department Project Prior Years
Funding
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Entity Fund Division Object Job Ledger
Page 121
PROJECTS
PROGRAM
MAJOR
T e l : ( 9 0 9 ) 4 7 7 - 2 7 4 0
F a x : ( 9 0 9 ) 4 7 7 - 2 7 4 1
1 0 5 0 0 C i v i c C e n t e r D r i v e ,
R a n c h o C u c a m o n g a , C A 9 1 7 3 0
w w w . C i t y o f R C . u s
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
Exhibit B
Page 122
Page 123
DRAINAGE
MPP 2024
2025
Page 124
Page 125
FACILITIES
MPP 2024
2025
Page 126
Page 127
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Animal Impact Fee (125)200,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:200,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$-
$-
$ 200,000
Animal Center Office Reconfigure
This project will reconfigure the Animal Center's staff office areas. This is the
second phase of the Animal Center's makeover completed in 2017.
The reconfiguration project will allow for more efficient use of the office
spaces, including increasing the number of work spaces available and adding
a volunteer area and conference room.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Animal Care Services Veronica Fincher
Facilities
District 4
Relentless pursuit of improvement
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Animal Center
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$-
$-
$ 200,000
$-
$-
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 128
JL Key GL Object
1894 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)3,528,000$
Community Benefit (030)-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:3,528,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
12505 Cultural Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2024/2025
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$-
$ 520,000
$ 3,528,000
$ 25,000
$ 383,000
$-
$-
$ 2,600,000
Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign
The Courtyard redesign will take a primarily passive, outdoor space with
little shade/seating and redesign it to encourage greater pedestrian access
and use.
The improvements will reduce staff time for event set up and take down,
and improve flow and continuity with the rest of Victoria Gardens. The
redesign project will open up new opportunities for rentals and increase
ticket sales at the Lewis Family Playhouse.
PROJECT FUNDING*
City Manager's Office Mike Parmer
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services This project may require a change in the type and frequency of
maintenance as well as increasing landscape and irrigation. It
will also reduce existing time for set up and take down of
equipment for special events.
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 129
JL Key GL Object
1348 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q2 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Law Enforcement Fund (017)88,000$
Fire Capital Projects (288)7,565,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:7,653,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 88,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 7,500,000 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:88,000$ 7,500,000$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
10510 Civic Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 7,653,000
$ -
$ 153,000
$ -
$ -
$ 7,500,000
EOC Relocation
This project will be a multi-year effort to assess, plan, and relocate the
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) as well as improve and modernize the
main RC Police Station.
Currently, the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is located on the top floor
of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Headquarters and accessing it
requires going through a secured area. Relocating the EOC will enhance
access, provide greater flexibility of the use of space, and facilitate future
growth for the City and the Police Department.
PROJECT FUNDING*
City Manager's Office Mike Parmer
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Routine operations and maintenance on the new facility.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 130
JL Key GL Object
1348 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q2 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Law Enforcment Reserve
(017)5,753,430$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:5,753,430$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 88,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 5,600,430 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:5,688,430$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
10510 Civic Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 5,753,430
$ -
$ 153,000
$ -
$ -
$ 5,600,430
RCPD Facility Improvement and Modernization
This project will be a multi-year effort to assess, plan, and construct projects
that will improve and modernize the main RC Police Station.
The current Police Station was constructed in the 1980s and is in need of
upgrading to accommodate changes in operations that have occurred
throughout the years since the facility was first built. The station's
maintenance plan also needs to be assessed to better understand the
necessary repairs for a structure of its age.
PROJECT FUNDING*
City Manager's Office Mike Parmer
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services This project will require .25 FTE to manage construction; there will
be no additional O&M impacts until the construction of
projects is completed.
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 131
JL Key GL Object
2107 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q1 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Park Improvement (119)156,930$
Capital Reserve Fund (025)775,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:931,930$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 707,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 67,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:775,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
There is no impact on operations.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 707,500
RC Family Resource Center Rehabilitation
$775,000 in grant funding has been secured from the American Rescue Plan
Act through San Bernardino County to facilitate much-needed renovations
including the replacement of the HVAC systems and flooring, installation of
lighting for energy efficiency and safety, community kitchen improvements,
new interior painting, and restroom improvements.
The Family Resource Center would benefit from a facility upgrade to keep
operations effective and efficient to meet the needs of the community best.
This project would make essential infrastructure improvements, improving
service deliverables to facility visitors.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
9791 Arrow Route
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 67,500
$ 931,930
$ 10,000
$ 146,930
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 132
JL Key GL Object
1645 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)788,740$
Capital Reserve Fund (025)300,000$
State Grants Fund (274)3,200,000$
-$
-$
Total Funding:4,288,740$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Opening of the park will require an O&M budget for utilites and
landscape maintenance.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ 278,000
$ -
$ 3,331,840
9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178 (Phase 2)
The 9/11 Memorial Park will be located on the southern section of the new
Fire Station 178 property and is approximately 1.3 acres. Fire Station 178 is a
new two-story fire station centrally located in an area of the city planned for
high-density residential and large-scale office building developments. Built
using a design-build process, the fire station will house the City's first electric
fire engine and also include a Records Storage Building and Library Kiosk.
The park will include artifacts from World Trade Center Building, Flight 93,
and the Pentagon. The artifacts have been linked together with a canopied
walking path and a central gathering space. Additional elements include a
local Gold Star Service Member memorial wall, benches for reflection, garden
areas, and gathering spaces.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Darci Vogel
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
10597 Town Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2024/2025
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 349,940
$ 282,120
$ 4,288,740
$ 13,200
$ 33,640
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 133
JL Key GL Object
2090 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2025 CY Q1 2027
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)19,286,770$
Library Fund (290)100,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:19,386,770$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ 1,952,610 $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 14,579,490 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 1,653,210 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ 18,985,310$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ 1,952,610
$ -
$ 14,579,490
Amethyst Fire Station 171 Rebuild
Replacement two-story, 10,000 sq ft fire station utilizing the design-build
process. The project will also incorporate a 24/7 Library Kiosk. RCMU will
extend fiber to the property as part of the project.
Built in 1974, Fire Station 171 is the oldest station in the city and has
increasing maintenance and repair expenses. It lacks ADA compliance, as well
as the functionality and physical space needed to accommodate the District's
diverse and growing workforce. The station is also unsecured with no fence
or gate to prevent public access.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Darci Vogel
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
6627 Amethyst Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 700,000
$ 1,653,210
$ 19,386,770
$ 100,000
$ 401,460
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 134
JL Key GL Object
2111 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)611,590$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:611,590$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 457,540 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 45,760 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:553,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
11108 Banyan Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 50,000
$ 45,760
$ 611,590
$ -
$ 58,290
$ -
$ -
$ 457,540
Banyan Fire Station 175 ADA Improvements
ADA accessibility improvements to Fire Station 175 restrooms in coordination
with projects at Fire Stations 173 and 174.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, in November
2020, a consultant was hired to complete a comprehensive ADA Self-
Evaluation and Transition Plan update to ensure that a plan is in place to meet
current requirements. The plan identified barrier removal projects for City
facilities, including Station 175.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Ty Harris
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 135
JL Key GL Object
2093 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)493,460$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:493,460$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 353,060 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 35,310 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:438,370$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 353,060
Day Creek Fire Station 173 ADA Improvements
ADA accessibility improvements to Fire Station 173 restrooms in coordination
with projects at Fire Stations 174 and 175.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, in November
2020, a consultant was hired to complete a comprehensive ADA Self-
Evaluation and Transition Plan update to ensure that a plan is in place to meet
current requirements. The plan identified barrier removal projects for City
facilities, including Station 173.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Ty Harris
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
12270 Firehouse Court
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 50,000
$ 35,310
$ 493,460
$ -
$ 55,090
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 136
JL Key GL Object
2092 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)55,090$
CFD 85-1 (282)647,920$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:703,010$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 543,560 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 54,360 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:647,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
11297 Jersey Boulevard
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 50,000
$ 54,360
$ 703,010
$ -
$ 55,090
$ -
$ -
$ 543,560
Jersey Fire Station 174 ADA Improvements
ADA accessibility improvements to Fire Station 174 restrooms in coordination
with projects at Fire Stations 173 and 175.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, in November
2020, a consultant was hired to complete a comprehensive ADA Self-
Evaluation and Transition Plan update to ensure that a plan is in place to meet
current requirements. The plan identified barrier removal projects for City
facilities, including Station 174.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Ty Harris
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 137
JL Key GL Object
1645 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2022 CY Q2 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)22,006,800$
Capital Reserve Fund (025)472,010$
Library Fund (290)63,610$
-$
-$
Total Funding:22,542,420$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
10595 Town Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$$$$
Impact Begins
FY 2023/2024
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 881,480
$ 1,575,870
$ 22,542,420
$ 58,610
$ 604,140
$ 1,236,600
$ 3,320,000
$ 14,865,720
Town Center Station 178 (Phase 1)
A new two-story fire station using a design-build process. The project will also
include Records Storage Building, Library Kiosk, and 9/11 Memorial Park. It
will house the City's first electric fire engine.
This station will be centrally located in an area of the city planned for high-
density residential and large-scale office building developments. This
strategic location provides for systemwide draw-down and corresponding
demands for service.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Fire District Darci Vogel
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services Opening of a new fire station will require adding 9 allocated
positons, purchasing a frontline apparatus, and adding a station
O&M budget. Personnel expenses to begin in March 2023, limited
O&M in May 2024, and full O&M in July 2024.
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 138
JL Key GL Object
2114 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q1 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Library Capital Fund (329)13,000,000$
Community Benefit (030)4,635,690$
TBD 5,000,000$
-$
Total Funding:22,635,690$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 15,349,280 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 3,377,280 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 2,982,730 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:21,709,290$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
9161 Base Line Road
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 3,377,280
$ 2,982,730
$ 22,635,690
$ -
$ 926,400
$ -
$ -
$ 15,349,280
Archibald Library Replacement Project
This project replaces the Archibald Library through the conversion of another
City-owned property and includes expanded and enhanced programs and
services.
The existing Archibald Library has significant infrastructure challenges, and
consultants have determined that even with site improvements, the property
is ill-suited to meet the current and future needs of the community.
Additional investments in the current facility would be fiscally irresponsible
given the site's limited options.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Library Services Cara Vera
Facilities
District 4
Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 139
JL Key GL Object
2115 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2023 CY Q1 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Library Capital Fund (329)1,200,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,200,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 349,830 $ 66,940 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 108,060 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:414,830$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
12505 Cultural Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 50,000
$ 108,060
$ 1,200,000
$ -
$ 70,980
$ -
$ -
$ 970,960
Paul A. Biane Library Infrastructure Project
The long-term impact of the Paul A. Biane Library infrastructure project is an
updating and readying of the building for the next 20 years of service.
The project will repair and replace building equipment and materials to meet
future use in a safer, more accessible, and sustainable way. Key project
elements will address the following: replace HVAC, repair ceiling leaks,
replace aging flooring, address ADA compliance issues, replace aging lighting
fixtures, upgrade security camera system.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Library Services Angelica Trummell
Facilities
District 4
Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 140
JL Key GL Object
5603
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)250,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:250,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Public Works Service Center
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 25,000
$ 250,000
$ -
$ -
$ 25,000
$ -
$ 200,000
Above Ground Diesel Tank Replacement Project
Remove 10,000-gallon diesel above ground storage tank (AST) at the Public
Works Service Center and replace it with a 2,000 gallon AST.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Richard Favela
Facilities
District 4
Relentless pursuit of improvement
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 141
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)532,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:532,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ 50,000
$ -
$ 432,000
Central Park Courtyard Improvements Project
Removal of existing palm trees. Demolition of exsiting concrete courtyard
surface. Installation of new outdoor courtyard surface.
Central Park's exterior courtyard concrete surface has been damaged due to
the existing palm tree root structure. This has resulted in unlevel surfaces
causing trip and fall hazards. The uneven concrete surface also negatively
affects water drainage from that area resulting in flooding of the area and
water intrusion into the building causing damage to interior finishes.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Central Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
FY 2025/2026
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 50,000
$ 532,000
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 142
JL Key GL Object
1978 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)9,360,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:9,360,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 145,000 $ 172,000 $ 150,000 $ 176,000 $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,370,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,720,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,760,000
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 137,000 $ 145,000 $ 172,000 $ 150,000 $ 176,000
Total Costs:1,652,000$ 1,767,000$ 2,042,000$ 1,826,000$ 1,936,000$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 7,800,000
Citywide - HVAC & Lighting Controls Project
Design for new lighting and HVAC controls and replacement of flourescent
and HID technology with LED. FY 23/24: Design Central Park; FY 24/25:
Construction CP, Design VGCC; FY 25/26: Construction VGCC, Design Stadium
and Sports Center; FY 26/27: Construction Stadium/Sports Center, Design
Civic Center; FY 27/28: Construction Civic Center, Design ACAC, PWSC, RCFRC,
Lions; FY 28/29 Construction ACAC, PSWC, RCFRC, Lions
The current lighting controls for the Civic Center were installed in 1989 and
are obsolete. Replacement parts are no longer available, same is true for
other City facilities. Out-of-date HVAC controls are another problem for City
facilities. Project goal is to standardized HVAC and lighting controls for all City
facilities. Follow state legislative phase out of older technology and upgrade
to LED lighting.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Citywide Facilities
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 780,000
$ 9,360,000
$ -
$ 780,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 143
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2024 CY Q1 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)747,230$
Fire Capital Projects (288)123,720$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:870,950$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 367,450 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 36,750 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:404,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Citywide & Fire District Access Control Upgrade
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Citywide & Districtwide
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 83,420
$ 870,950
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 787,530
Replacement of citywide and fire district access control system. New high
security card keys, card readers and control system. FY 23/24 replacements at
Civic Center, PD, and the Stadium. FY 24/25 will cover all remaining city and
fire district facilities.
The existing access control system is over 20 years old and does not provide
adequate security against potential system breaches. The new access control
system works on a more secure frequency and securely protects against false
access attempts.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 144
JL Key GL Object
2170 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 9 (139)450,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:450,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ 65,000
$ -
$ 350,000
Citywide Sports Lighting Upgrade Program
Install new electrical infrastructure, light poles, light pole foundations and LED
sports lights at Garcia Park FY 24/25
The new LED sports lighting fixtures at Garcia Park will provide an additional
lighted baseball field for user groups and programming use.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-Year projection
Garcia Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
FY 2024/2025
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ -
$ 35,000
$ 450,000
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 145
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)900,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:900,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Civic Center
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 75,000
$ 900,000
$ -
$ -
$ 75,000
$ -
$ 750,000
Civic Center Sewer Line Replacement Project
Replacement of all sewer and storm drain cast iron piping.
The exisiting cast iron sewer and storm drain lines at the Civic Center are over
30 years old and have exceeded their life span. Leaks are becoming a regular
occurance due to cracking pipes with sewage and dirty water continuing to
intrude into occupied spaces causing health and safety concerns.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 146
JL Key GL Object
1025 5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q1 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)2,234,760$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:2,234,760$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,862,300 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 186,230 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:2,048,530$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,862,300
Civic Center Waterproofing & Roof Repairs Project
Replace existing SBS roofing and replace existing rubberized asphalt roofing.
Re-seal existing brick veneer. Remove and replace all sealant joints, backer-
rods, etc.
The existing roofing of the City Hall building has deteriorated and needs to be
replaced. Exposure to the outside enviroment has caused the sealant for the
City Hall building's brick veneer to deterioate. Likewise, the existing joints on
the outside of City Hall have shrunken and cracked due to exposure to the
environment. This allows water to seep into the building causing damage.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Civic Center
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 186,230
$ 2,234,760
$ -
$ 186,230
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 147
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)580,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:580,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
PWSC
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 50,000
$ 580,000
$ -
$ 30,000
$ -
$ -
$ 500,000
Corporate Yard EV Charging Stations Project
Installation of multiple electric vehicle charging stations for current and
future City owned electric vehicle needs.
The recent inclusion and future expansion of City owned electric vehicles
requires the need to provide electric vehicle charging stations for internal use
only.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 148
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)162,500$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:162,500$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes Prior & Future Years
City Hall Council Chambers
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 10,000
$ 162,500
$ -
$ 12,500
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 140,000
Council Chambers - Carpeting and Seating Replacement
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Replacement of carpeting and seating in City Council Chambers, plus new
carpet in adjacent hallways and DeAnza and Serrano conference rooms.
The existing carpet and seating in the City Council Chambers and conference
rooms were installed in 1990 and have reached the end of their useful lives.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 149
JL Key GL Object
2168 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q1 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)2,000,000$
Community Benefit Project
Fund (030)2,000,000$
Park Development Fund
(120)1,190,000$
‐$
‐$
Total Funding: 5,190,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Design/Plan Review $ 389,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Design/Build $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Right‐of‐Way $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Construction $ 4,182,360 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Inspection & Administration $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Contingency $ 618,640 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Total Costs: 5,190,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5 ‐Year Projection, and Future Years)
Quakes Stadium
5‐YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ ‐
$ 618,640
$ 5,190,000
$ ‐
$ 389,000
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ 4,182,360
Quakes Stadium Upgrades
Improvements at the Stadium for the Home and Visitors' Clubhouses and
backstop netting extension.
MLB standards require certain upgrades be completed at the Quakes
Stadium. This project will ensure the Stadium meet MLB standards.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Building and preserving a family‐oriented atmosphere
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
Page 150
JL Key GL Object
5602
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2025 CY Q1 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Capital Reserve Fund (025)480,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:480,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:480,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
RC Sports Center
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
FY 2024/2025
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 40,000
$ 480,000
$ -
$ -
$ 40,000
$ -
$ 400,000
RC Sports Center Sewer Line Improvement Project
Replacement of existing undersized sewer line.
The exisiting 4" sewer line was originally designed undersized resulting in
frequent sewage back-ups and overflows. The recomendation is to properly
install a new 6" line to adequately service the facility. Litigation with the
original construction general contractor resulted in a monetary award to the
City for future improvements.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Andy Miller
Facilities
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 151
MISCELLANEOUS
MPP 2024
2025
Page 152
Page 153
JL Key GL Object
2122 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
State Grants Fund (274)1,900,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,900,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Northern Wildland Urban Interface
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$$
Impact Begins
FY 2031/2032
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$-
$-
$ 1,900,000
$-
$-
$-
$-
$ 1,900,000
Wildfire Early Detection System
Installation of a 30-camera unit, early wildfire detection system along the
City's nothern boundary. Includes a 6-year subscription and license, cell data
access, and training for staff.
The system will provide rapid detection, reporting, and response to wildfires
along City’s northern boundary, following the wildland-urban interface to the
Alta Loma and Etiwanda neighborhoods along the foothills of the San Gabriel
mountains. The system will save significant resources, money, and most
importantly, lives. The project will provide for initial construction as well as
ongoing training, maintenance, and implementation.
PROJECT FUNDING*
City Manager's Office Mike Parmer
Miscellaneous
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services Impact on operations will be moderate with annual costs of an
annual subscription and license to webportal, cellular data, training,
and cell tower lease(s).
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 154
Page 155
MUNICIPAL
UTILITIES
MPP 2024
2025
Page 156
Page 157
JL Key GL Object
2096 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2026 CY Q3 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Fire Capital Projects (288)80,000$
Fiber Optic Network (711)80,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:160,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services Required staffing, equipment, and O&M costs are already included
within the District's budget. Annual debt service may be needed if
a lease-lease back option is used to finance construction.
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 135,000
RC Fiber Extension - Amethyst Avenue
Installation of approximately 6,000 LF of fiber optic cable to be installed along
Base Line Road/Amethyst Street in existing fiber conduit to be extended to
Fire Station 171.
Connecting all City and Fire facilities to the City's fiber optic network will
optimize communication and uniform connectivity. This project also provides
options to expand to potential new customers in the area.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Fred Lyn
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Amethyst Avenue - Baseline Road to Fire Station 171
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 20,000
$ 160,000
$ -
$ 5,000
Page 158
JL Key GL Object
2171 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2027 CY Q1 2028
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Municipal Utility (705)13,045,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:13,045,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ 13,000,000 $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:15,000$ 30,000$ 13,000,000$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Annual O&M costs will be included in RCMU's budget. Annual debt
service may be needed if construction is financed.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 13,000,000
RCMU Electric Substation - Southeast
Development of a new RCMU substation to be interconnected with SCE's
existing transmission/sub-transmission line and RCMU's existing distribution
line in order to increase RCMU's capacity to service new electrical load.
A second substation is needed in order to provide new electric service
because the existing Arbors Substation will be nearing its capacity due to
recent high industrial loads. In order for RCMU to continue to serve existing
and provide for new customers, a second substation with an interconnection
to SCE's transmission/sub-transmission lines will be needed, in addition to
connecting to RCMU's existing distribution line will ensure electric reliability.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Fred Lyn
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Unknown
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$$
Impact Begins
FY 2027/2028
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 13,045,000
$ 15,000
$ 30,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 159
JL Key GL Object
2095 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Municipal Utility (705)1,235,425$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,235,425$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ 15,575 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 234,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 9,350 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:308,925$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
8303 Rochester Avenue
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
CY Q1 2025
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 9,350
$ 50,000
$ 1,235,425
$ 15,575
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,160,500
RCMU EV Charging Station Hub
Four (4) 200kW DC Fast Charger Electric Vehicle Charging Stations will be
installed in the RC Sports Center parking lot.
Demand for EV charging will increase in the near future and RCMU is
embracing the electric transportation mantra to support EV demand and
reduce greenhouse gases. The State CALeVIP and Federal EECBG funding is
reserved and appropriated in Fund 705.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Deborah Allen
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Includes vendor warranty for equipment and technical support.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 160
JL Key GL Object
2126 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
Q2 2025 Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Municipal Utility (705)3,697,090$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:3,697,090$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Etiwanda Ave - Foothill Blvd to Church Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
2025/26
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 153,370
$ 3,697,090
$ -
$ 10,000
$ -
$ -
$ 3,533,720
RCMU Line Extension - Etiwanda North Phase 2
Installation of 4,500' of new 12 kV electric distribution and fiber optic line
extension to connect to existing second circuit to complete a circuit loop
feed.
This phase 2 extension project will complete a circuit loop feed heading north
on Etiwanda Ave to Church Street and west to Bass Pro Shops. This loop will
provide redundancy in RCMU's existing electric distribution system.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Fred Lyn
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Minimal O&M for the first few years. Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 161
JL Key GL Object
2172 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
Q1 2025 Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Municipal Utility (705)1,600,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,600,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 795,000 $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:800,000$ -$ 800,000$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Minimal O&M for the first few years. Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,595,000
RCMU Line Extension - Milliken Ave South of Jersey Blvd
Installation of 2,400' of new 12 kV electric distribution and fiber line extension
to connect to existing RCMU circuit to prepare for Brightline West's
temporary construction and permanent power needs and connect to an
existing 2nd circuit.
This RCMU extension project will provide electric service to the future
Brightline West station, parking garage and EV charging stalls. The 2nd phase
construction loop will provide redudancy in RCMU's existing electric
distribution system.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Fred Lyn
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Milliken Avenue - Jersey Boulevard to Cucamonga Station Area
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
2025/26
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 1,600,000
$ -
$ 5,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 162
JL Key GL Object
2037 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
Q3 2025 Q2 2028
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Municipal Utility (705)84,000$
Fiber Optic Network (711)16,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:100,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:20,000$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 30,000$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
The Resort Parkway - North of Sixth Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$$
Impact Begins
2026/27
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 60,000
$ -
$ 100,000
$ -
$ 40,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
The Resort Parkway North - RCMU Distribution
New RCMU electric distribution and fiber optic cable will need to be installed
as the Resort Parkway north of Sixth Street is developed. The developer of the
project is planning on Applicant Design and Applicant Install for this new
extension.
This extension project will provide the required electric and fiber optic
infrastructure needed to service this new development. RCMU will need to
provide design comments, plan check and review, utility inspection and
overall administration of the developer's construction. All RCMU costs will be
reimbursed from the developer.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Fred Lyn
Municipal Utilities
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Minimal O&M for the first few years.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 163
PARKS &
RECREATION
MPP 2024
2025
Page 164
Page 165
JL Key GL Object
2091 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Federal Grants Fund (275)1,000,000$
Park Dev Fund (120)808,400$
Fire Capital Projects (288)200,000$
-$
-$
Total Funding:2,008,400$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,394,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 253,900 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,808,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,394,500
Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead
A trailhead located on a 5.25 acre piece of property near Cucamonga Canyon.
Amenities to include a monument, benches, shade structure, water fountain,
and storage.
The site is ideal as a base of operations for public safety during emergencies,
as well as the Cucamonga Foothill Preservation Alliance, who provides
volunteer services for Cucamonga Canyon. The Fire District acquired the
property from the County in December 2021 and is required to improve and
develop it.
PROJECT FUNDING*
City Manager's Office Mike Parmer
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Skyline Road/Almond Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
FY 2025/2026
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 253,900
$ 2,008,400
$ 200,000
$ 160,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 166
JL Key GL Object
2141 5607
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2024 CY Q3 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 1-Capital Rplcmt (141)62,520$
Park Development Fund
(120)26,910$
Park Improvement (119)899,290$
State Grants Fund (274)286,750$
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund
(174)35,000$
Total Funding:1,310,470$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,114,140
Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground
This project will replace the playground equipment at Beryl Park East with
inclusive equipment. The project will include an upgraded crosswalk with a
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and ADA improvements to the
parking lot and restrooms.
This project will be the city's first all-inclusive playground, featuring active
play equipment for all abilities. In addition to improving access to the
playground, restrooms, and parking lot with ADA upgrades, the upgraded
crosswalk also improves safety. The City anticipates receiving $286,742 in
reimbursable State Prop 68 grant funds.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Community Services Chandra Thomas
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
6524 Beryl Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 106,900
$ 1,310,470
$ -
$ 89,430
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 167
JL Key GL Object
1533 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2026 CY Q1 2027
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Ped Grant/Art3 Fund (214)162,415$
AB 2766 Air Qual Imprv
Fund (105)147,056$
TBD 644,000$
-$
-$
Total Funding:953,471$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ 733,380 $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ 32,500 $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ 53,146 $ - $ -
Total Costs:65,000$ -$ 819,026$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 733,380
Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail
This project involves reconstructing a portion existing trail, slurry seal coating,
striping and new signage along the Cucamonga Creek Channel trail.
This project will enhance pedestrian and bicyclists safety by restoring the existing
bike trail to new condition and extending the pavement life.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Cesar Guevara
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 32,500
$ 53,146
$ 953,471
$ -
$ 134,445
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 168
JL Key GL Object
2014 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
AB 2766 Air Qual Imprv Fund
(105)320,160$
Ped Grant/Art3 Fund (214)510,250$
Measure I Fund (177)79,610$
Infrastructure Fund (198)42,730$
Measure I Fund (176)65,560$
Total Funding:1,018,310$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Maintenance for striping, debris cleaning, and traffic signal system Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ 47,275
$ 757,035
Day Creek Channel Bike Trail
ADA accesible paved trail for pedestrians and bicyclists with signalized
crossing at Church Street and access path to the Sports Center for special
events and recreational use.
Enhances quality of life by providing a designated path for walking, biking and
rolling for both recreational and commuting purposes.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Chi Chan
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Day Creek Channel from Jack Benny Drive to Base Line Road
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2024/2025
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 91,000
$ 107,000
$ 1,018,310
$ -
$ 16,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 169
JL Key GL Object
1963 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
PD 85 Redemption Fund
(848)108,109$
PD 85-Capital Rplcmt (847)20,035$
Fire Capital Projects (288)1,424,583$
Infrastructure Fund (198)1,357,273$
-$
Total Funding:2,910,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:2,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 2,000,000
Heritage Park Bridge Replacements
Construct new multi-use bridge to replace the vehicular, pedestrian, and
equestrian bridges that span Demens Creek Channel to the equestrian arenas
in Heritage Community Park.
The existing timber-framed bridges are approaching the end of their service
lives and need to be replaced to maintain access to the equestrian facilities,
trails, and Fire District emergency response staging area.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Krystal Lai
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Heritage Park, Southwest Corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 2,910,000
$ 100,000
$ 410,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 170
JL Key GL Object
2169 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 2 (131)627,350$
141,600$
LMD 1-Capital Rplcmt (141)-$
#REF!-$
-$
Total Funding:768,950$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 24,600 $ 22,500 $ 24,700 $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 351,870 $ 134,900 $ 147,000 $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 35,190 $ 13,490 $ 14,700 $ - $ -
Total Costs:411,660$ 170,890$ 186,400$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
LMD 2 Paseos, Victoria Arbors, Hermosa, Bear Gulch, and Golden
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ -
$ 63,380
$ 768,950
$ -
$ 71,800
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 633,770
Citywide Site Lighting Repairs and Upgrades Program
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Re-wiring or replacement of existing lighting infrastructure and installation of
LED site, paseo, and parking lot lighting. FY 23/24: LMD 2 Paseo Lighting
Retrofits; FY 24/25: Victoria Arbors Park, LMD 2 Paseo Lighting Retrofits,
Hermosa Park; FY 25/26: LMD 2 Paseo Lighting Retrofits, Bear Gulch Park; FY
26/27: LMD 2 Paseo Lighting Retrofits, Golden Oak Park
This project addresses critical infrastructure needs by resolving issues from
aged wiring and light fixtures that are no longer functional, as well as
upgrades to LED lighting for improved energy efficiency and sustainability
goals.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Will McAllister
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 171
JL Key GL Object
5607
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q3 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 10 (140)75,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:75,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Day Creek Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 75,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 75,000
Day Creek Tennis Court Renovation Project
Resurfacing the tennis courts and adding wind screening to the courts at Day
Creek Park
The tennis court at Day Creek Park need to be resurfaced and the wind
screens need to be reinstalled. Tennis courts should be resurfaced every 5 to
10 years and the last time resurfacing was completed was 2012. The wind
screens have also become damaged over time and will need to be replaced.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Daniel Akers
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 172
JL Key GL Object
5607
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q1 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 2 (131)197,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:197,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 179,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:197,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 179,000
DG Trail Renovation on Victoria Park Lane Project
Renovation and repairs for the Decomposed Granite Trail on Victoria Park
Lane from Milliken to Rochester.
This project will repair 40,000 square feet of DG, 200 linear feet of mow curb,
and 5,720 sf of sidewalks along the trail on VPL. Erosion and root intrusion
are causing damage to the trail and a larger renovation is needed.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Sonny Rodriguez
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Victoria Park Lane
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 18,000
$ 197,000
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 173
JL Key GL Object
5607
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q3 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
PD 85 Redemption Fund
(848)252,740$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:252,740$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 216,740 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:246,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
With the new Portions of the pedestrian trail installed, "grind
downs" and other temporary repairs will no longer be needed. Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 216,740
Heritage Park - Pedestrian Trail Project
Replace the remaining portion of damaged sections of asphalt pedestrian trail
within Heritage Park not completed in phase one.
Multiple sections of the existing pedestrian trail are damaged and must be
replaced for the safety of the park users.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Richard Favela
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all
*Includes Prior & Future Years
Heritage Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ 30,000
$ 246,740
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 174
JL Key GL Object
5603
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 6 (136)126,500$
LMD 10 (140)109,250$
LMD 1-Capital Rplcmt (141)100,000$
Sports Complex (700)68,250$
PD 85-Capital Rplcmt (847)52,500$
-$
Total Funding:456,500$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 456,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:456,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Irrigation Controllers Project
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 456,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 456,500
Replacing old irrigation controllers with remote operated, smart controllers
for more efficienct water management.
In 2022, the City started replacing old irrigation controllers to reduce water
use and increase efficiency in water management. The results have been
significant reductions in water usage, and cost of water utilities is down in all
areas in which controllers were replaced.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Daniel Akers
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 175
JL Key GL Object
2102 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2024 CY Q4 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 2 (131)250,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:250,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:210,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 210,000
LMD 2 Park Upgrades RIRE Grant Project
City to improve and enhance LMD 2 Parks and then to be reimbursed by State
Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement (RIRE) grant program
funds. FY 24/25 funding will be used for the shade structure at Ellena Park.
Landscape Maintenance District 2 is the sole City LMD to meet the
qualifications necessary to receive State funds from the RIRE grant program.
The shade structure at Ellena Park was identified as a project to utilize RIRE
grant funding in LMD-2, as it was removed in 2021 due to safety concerns.
Funds carried over from 23/24 and matching city funds are not required to
install the improvements.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Daniel Akers
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Ellena Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 250,000
$ -
$ 40,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 176
JL Key GL Object
5607
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 4 (134)943,750$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:943,750$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 943,750 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:943,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 943,750
Mountain View Park Playground Replacement
Replace the Playground at Mountain View Park
The existing rubberized surfacing needs to be replaced so the City is taking
this opportunity to replace the existing play equipment with equipment that
will set Mountain View Park apart from any of our other city parks.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Daniel Akers
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Mountain View Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 943,750
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 177
JL Key GL Object
2130 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
PD 85-Capital Rplcmt (847)200,000$
PD 85 Redemption Fund
(848)600,000$
Capital Reserve Fund (025)500,000$
Park Development Fund
(120)500,000$
-$
Total Funding:1,800,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Red Hill Park
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ -
$ -
$ 1,800,000
$ -
$ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ 1,600,000
Red Hill South Beautification Project
Refresh of the south side of the park, reduce the size of the water feature,
add water filtration system, and incorporate other asthetic design elements.
This project will provide the solution to the inefficiencies of our current water
feature, while also providing an opportunity to incorporate other design
elements, creating a more versatile space, and increasing the quality of
visitors experiences.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Public Works Neil Plummer
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Relentless pursuit of improvement
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 178
JL Key GL Object
1787 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
LMD 2 (131)1,825,000$
LMD 4 (134)390,000$
LMD 6 (136)100,000$
LMD 1-Capital Rplcmt (141)50,000$
-$
Total Funding:2,365,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 454,500 $ 657,000 $ 567,000 $ 450,000 $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 50,500 $ 73,000 $ 63,000 $ 50,000 $ -
Total Costs:505,000$ 730,000$ 630,000$ 500,000$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Daniel Akers
Parks & Recreation
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,128,500
Continuation of previous work to remove turf and replace with drought
tolerant landscaping and hardscape. This will be a continuation to replace
non-functional turf areas in LMD 2, LMD 4, and LMD 6. LMD 1 will be planting
projects.
This project will reduce water usage and labor costs to irrigate and maintain
landscaping. The watering of non-functional turf is currently banned and
landscape water usage will need to be further reduced in the future.
Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Program
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
LMD1, LMD 2, LMD 4, LMD 6
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Program
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ -
$ 236,500
$ 2,365,000
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 179
STREETS
MPP 2024
2025
Page 180
Page 181
JL Key GL Object
1839 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2026 CY Q3 2026
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Transportation Fund (124)2,519,000$
Industrial Traffic Fund (199)1,000,000$
Municipal Utility (705)200,000$
-$
-$
Total Funding:3,719,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 165,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:665,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Start-up and operation of new lighting. Maintenance of roadway.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ 500,000
$ 2,500,000
6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing
This project involves constructing an at grade crossing at 6th Street and the
BNSF Railroad Spur.
The project completes the 6th Street roadway between Milliken Avenue and
Etiwanda Avenue. It will improve traffic circulation, movement of goods, and
emergency response in the area.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Cesar Guevara
Streets
District 4
To build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable,
sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive.
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
6th Street between I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 3,719,000
$ -
$ 219,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 182
JL Key GL Object
2005 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2024 CY Q3 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Measure I Fund (177)1,220,000$
Infrastructure Fund (198)488,220$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,708,220$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,020,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 98,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 102,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,166,850
6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Cycle Track
Construction of a Class 4 Bike Lane (Cycle Track) on both north & south sides
of 6th Street. Contains both delineator buffers and raised bike lanes and will
include repaving.
These improvements are part of a regional project being led by SBCTA &
funded by a Caltrans Active Transportation Program grant. The project will
further the City's goals of building infrastructure to improve connectivity &
promote alternative modes of travel. The budget outlined is for the City's
share of the total project cost plus road rehab.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Sarine Hazarshahian
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 98,000
$ 102,000
$ 1,708,220
$ -
$ 341,370
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 183
JL Key GL Object
2101 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2025 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Infrastructure Fund (198)1,145,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,145,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:120,000$ 980,000$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Almond Street from Carnelian Street to east of Via Verde
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY2026-27
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 100,000
$ 80,000
$ 1,145,000
$ 45,000
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ 800,000
Almond Street Extension Street Improvements
The Almond Street Extension project includes constructing a new local road
consisting of one lane in each direction, to complete the connection of
Almond Street between Carnelian Street and Via Verde.
Completion of these improvements would provide an additional east-west
street connection north of SR-210, improving traffic circulation and public
safety access in support of the goals of the General Plan.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Romeo David
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Minimal increases to operations costs for maintenance of the
newly constructed improvementsOperations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 184
JL Key GL Object
2123 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2025 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Infrastructure Fund (198)225,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:225,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 16,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 19,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 190,000
Civic Center Drive Crosswalk
This project will include, but not limited to, the relocation of crosswalk, the
construction of ADA compliant ramps, and installation of refuge island and
buffered bike lane at Civic Center Drive from Haven Avenue to Red Oak
Street.
This project will provide pedestrians and cyclists a safe and accessible path
along Civic Center Drive. Such improvement will promote a more comfortable
walking and biking enviroment in the areas around City Hall, the County
Courthouse, and adjacent commercial sites per the General Plan and Civic
Center Master Plan.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Krystal Lai
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Civic Center Drive
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 16,000
$ 19,000
$ 225,000
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 185
JL Key GL Object
2002 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2025 CY Q4 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Transportation Fund (124)1,793,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,793,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 122,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 122,500 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Etiwanda Avenue between Whittram Avenue and Arrow Route
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2025/2026
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 122,500
$ 122,500
$ 1,793,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 423,000
$ 1,125,000
Etiwanda East Side Widening
This project involves street widening on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue
including curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, utility relocations, and
pavement rehabilitation.
This project will enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety by completing the
missing section of northbound vehicle lane, adjacent sidewalk and street
lighting.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Chi Chan
Streets
District 4
To build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable,
sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive.
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Start-up and operation of new lighting. Maintenance of roadway.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 186
JL Key GL Object
1922 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2027 CY Q1 2031
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
SB1-TCEP (181)23,000,000$
Infrastructure Fund (198)4,675,000$
TBD 26,000,000$
TBD 94,000,000$
-$
Total Funding:147,675,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ 1,140,000 $ 26,000,000 $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ 73,000,000 $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ 11,600,000 $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ 9,400,000 $ - $ -
Total Costs:1,140,000$ 26,000,000$ 94,000,000$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Etiwanda Avenue, between Whittram Avenue and Napa Street
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2030/2031
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 11,600,000
$ 9,400,000
$ 147,675,000
$ -
$ 6,800,000
$ -
$ 46,875,000
$ 73,000,000
Etiwanda Grade Separation
Provides an elevated 1,015' long, four-lane roadway crossing over the
SCRRA/BNSF railroad with pedestrian and bicycle paths, and new access roads
to existing businesses.
The bridge and roadway widening will improve safety and traffic circulation by
eliminating the at-grade crossing, which is expected to see significant
increases in vehicular traffic and train activity by the year 2040. The reduced
delays are expected to stimulate economic activity in the area while also
decreasing emissions from idling vehicles.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Jason Welday
Streets
District 4
To build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable,
sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive.
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services Start-up and operation of new signals and lighting. Maintenance of
roadways, drainage system and basin, landscaping, graffiti removal.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 187
JL Key GL Object
1864 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q3 2024 CY Q3 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Ped Grant/Art3 Fund (214)227,192$
AB 2766 Air Qual Imprv Fund
(105)395,808$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:623,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 457,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:577,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Haven Avenue
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 75,000
$ 45,000
$ 623,000
$ -
$ -
$ 10,000
$ 36,000
$ 457,000
Haven Avenue Sidewalk
This project involves construction of a sidewalk along the east side of Haven
Avenue, in front of Chaffey College.
This project will enhance bicycle and pedestrian access, improve safety, and
encourage walking/bicycling.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Cesar Guevara
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 188
JL Key GL Object
2166 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q2 2025 CY Q2 2025
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Drainage General Fund (112)226,940$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:226,940$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 191,400 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 15,950 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 19,140 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:226,490$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 15,950
$ 19,140
$ 226,490
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 191,400
Hellman and Feron Storm Drain
Catch basin(s) will be constructed on Feron Boulevard to connect to the main
storm drain system on Hellman Avenue to ensure proper flow of water in this
area.
During winter 2024 rain storms, significant roadway flooding was discovered
along a newly constructed portion of Feron Avenue. In order to mitigate the
flooding, catch basins will be constructed to capture the additional water and
direct it into the existing Hellman Avenue storm drain.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Krystal Lai
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Completion of this project will reduce the maintenance and
operation costs at the troubled area.Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 189
JL Key GL Object
1022 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund
(174)3,775,000$
Measure I Fund (177)22,400,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:26,175,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 3,850,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000
Inspection & Administration $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000
Contingency $ 375,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Total Costs:4,655,000$ 5,380,000$ 5,380,000$ 5,380,000$ 5,380,000$
*Includes the full program funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
Various Locations
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ 1,450,000
$ 2,175,000
$ 26,175,000
$ -
$ 700,000
$ -
$ -
$ 21,850,000
Local Streets Paving Program
The Local Streets Paving Program consists of slurry seal and grind and overlay
on local neighborhood streets throughout the city to preserve and extend the
life of pavement.
This pavement overlay project will restore the existing road surface to a
substantially new condition extending pavement life, use and rideability.
Streets slated for overlay have an average Pavement Condition Index of 45
and those slated for slurry seal have an average of 65.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Engineering Services Romeo David
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
Page 190
JL Key GL Object
2097, 2099, 2100 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Road Maintenance & Rehab
(179)19,820,000$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:19,820,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ 630,000 $ 630,000 $ 630,000 $ 630,000
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 3,100,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
Inspection & Administration $ 151,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Contingency $ 249,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Total Costs:3,500,000$ 4,080,000$ 4,080,000$ 4,080,000$ 4,080,000$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 15,100,000
Major Arterial Paving Program
Asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, cold planing, crack sealing, utility adjustment,
video detection, green bike lane striping and curb ramps upgrade. FY23/24:
Milliken Ave from Baseline Rd to Banyan St. FY24/25: Hermosa Ave from
Wilson Ave to NCL and Base Line Rd from Day Creek Blvd to Forester Pl.
This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new
condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Current Pavement
Condition range from 35 to 48.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Engineering Services Romeo David
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full program funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
Milliken, Base Line, Hermosa
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ 751,000
$ 1,449,000
$ 19,820,000
$ -
$ 2,520,000
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 191
JL Key GL Object
1964 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q1 2024 CY Q2 2024
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Infrastructure Fund (198)4,645,115$
Transportation Fund (124)226,760$
State Grants Fund (274)2,400,000$
-$
-$
Total Funding:7,271,875$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services The proposed improvements will add a maintenance cost due to
new multipurpose sidewalks and traffic signal. However, there will
be a reduction in costs for pavement maintenance and extended
life of the street improvements
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 6,711,090
West Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements
Construct sidewalks, curb and gutters, Street lights, striping, new asphalt and
realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive new traffic signal.
Addition of multi use pedestrian/bike sidewalks will improve safety, mobility,
reduction of vehicle miles traveled and New Asphalt Pavement will restore
roadway pavement to new condition and extend pavement service life. The
current PCI is 41.
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Romeo David
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Foothill Boulevard, from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$
Impact Begins
FY2024/25
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 225,230
$ 335,555
$ 7,271,875
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 192
JL Key GL Object
1991 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
General Fund (001)2,775,000$
Measure I Fund (177)500,000$
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund
(174)150,000$
LMD 2 (131)250,000$
LMD 4 (134)400,000$
Total Funding:4,075,000$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 1,165,000 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 650,000
Inspection & Administration $ 155,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000
Contingency $ 55,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Total Costs:1,375,000$ 600,000$ 650,000$ 700,000$ 750,000$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Richard Favela
Streets
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 3,465,000
Remove and replace sections of concrete sidewalks, curb/gutters, and drive
approaches. FY 24/25 will focus on sidewalk repairs on Stoneview Road,
Victoria Park Lane, and locations across LMD-4 and LMD-2.
This project replaces damaged sections of concrete sidewalks, curb/gutters,
and drive approaches which are a potential public safety concern
Citywide Concrete Repair Program
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
Citywide Concrete Repairs
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Program
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ 475,000
$ 135,000
$ 4,075,000
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 193
TRAFFIC
MPP 2024
2025
Page 194
Page 195
JL Key GL Object
2004 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
CY Q4 2024 200
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Transportation Fund (124)8,813,085$
Fire Capital Projects (288)80,870$
Fiber Optic Network (711)80,870$
Federal Grants Fund (275)1,000,000$
-$
Total Funding:9,974,825$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 8,170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Inspection & Administration $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 817,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Costs:9,087,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates (i.e., Prior Years, Current 5-Year Projection, and Future Years)
Milliken Avenue, 19th Street, Arrow Route, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard
5-YEAR PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Project
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
$$
Impact Begins
FY 2026/2027
TOTAL PROJECT
COST*
$ 100,000
$ 817,000
$ 9,974,825
$ -
$ 657,825
$ -
$ -
$ 8,400,000
Advanced Traffic Management System - Phase 2
Installation of CCTV and VDS cameras, fiber optic communication, upgrading
and integrating traffic signals with the Traffic Management Center located at
City Hall, and implementing coordination timing at various locations.
Implementation of this project will enable real time reactivity and improve
monitoring, retiming and coordination of the City's traffic signal system as a
part of a multiphase project to implement the Traffic Signals Communication
Master plan adopted in 2018
PROJECT FUNDING*
Engineering Services Krystal Lai
Traffic
District 4
Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services Project costs include O&M agreements for ongoing diagnostics of
network and coordination issues, maintenance of hardware. Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 196
JL Key GL Object
2035 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund
(174)1,287,220$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,287,220$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ 200,000 $ 217,800 $ 239,580 $ 239,580 $ 263,540
Inspection & Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ 20,000 $ 24,200 $ 26,620 $ 26,620 $ 29,280
Total Costs:220,000$ 242,000$ 266,200$ 266,200$ 292,820$
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
$ -
$ -
$ 1,160,500
Traffic Signal Modification Program
A continuous project to modify the City's oldest traffic signal cabinets Eng.
Location: Archibald Avenue at 6th Street and Milliken Avenue at 6th Street.
The older traffic signal cabinets range from 27 to 35 years old and must be
modified or updated to meet current standards. Two examples of older
intersections are Archibald Avenue at 6th Street, installed in 1986, and in
1994, Milliken Avenue and 6th Street were installed.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Richard Favela
Traffic
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
Multiple Locations Citywide
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Program
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ -
$ 126,720
$ 1,287,220
$ -
$ -
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 197
JL Key GL Object
1980 5650
Council Districts
District 1 District 2 District 3
Project Location
Project Type
Est. Construction Start Est. Construction End
N/A N/A
Lead Department Lead Project Manager
Council Goal
Funding Source Amount
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund
(174)664,275$
Equip/Veh Rplcmt (712)765,000$
-$
-$
-$
Total Funding:1,429,275$
Expenditure Category 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029
Environmental/NPDES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Plan Review $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/Build $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction $ - $ 278,100 $ 333,000 $ 333,000 $ 333,000
Inspection & Administration $ - $ 9,247 $ - $ - $ -
Contingency $ - $ 31,928 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000
Total Costs:-$ 319,275$ 370,000$ 370,000$ 370,000$
*Includes the full project funding or cost estimates for current 5-year projection
Multiple Locations Citywide
5-YEAR PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES
Program
Description
Justification
Overall Level of
Impact
Impact Begins
TOTAL
PROGRAM
COST*
$ 9,247
$ 142,928
$ 1,429,275
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,277,100
TS Signal Battery Backup Replacement Program
This multi-phase project to replace the BBS for signalized intersections will be
completed in FY23/24. Moving forward, the Traffic Signal Supervisor will
create a 10-year grid cycle replacement program estimated to begin FY25/26.
The BBS will place intersections in a four-way red flash when the intersection
experiences a power outage. The battery backup systems have reached their
service life, are no longer supported by the manufacturer, and have seriously
degraded reliability. When they fail, the last twenty units are no longer
repairable and must be replaced with a new system.
PROGRAM FUNDING*
Public Works Richard Favela
Traffic
District 4
Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all
No ImpactIMPACT ON OPERATIONS
Expenditure Category Description of Impact
Personnel Services
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service
PROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTOPROJECT PHOTO
Page 198
Page 199
“PROJECTS IN
THE ROUGH”
MPP 2024
2025
Page 200
Page 201
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
$ -
-$
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
1 City Manager's
Office Facilities RCPD Substation Relocation 10510 Civic Center Drive
Multi-year effort to assess, plan, and
relocate and construct a new RC Police
Substation.
TBD
2 Fire District Facilities Day Creek Station 173 Urban
Park 12771 Firehouse Court
An urban park space in the SE corner of
Fire Station 173 property utilizing the
design-build process in coordination with
projects at Fire Stations 171, 174, and
175.
$ 1,188,991
3 Fire District Facilities Fire Administration
Headquarters 10600 Civic Center Drive
construction of two-story L-shaped
building approximately 26,000 square
feet. The property is approximately .93
acres and located on the NW corner of
Utica Avenue and Civic Center
$ 17,969,570
4 Public Works Facilities Fleet EV Work Station
Reconfiguration Project Public Works Service Center
Reconfigure the current fleet and
warehouse workspaces to incorporate an
EV workstation.
TBD
5 Public Works Facilities Fleet Shop - Rental Space 9153 9th Street
Remodel front office areas of the old PW
building for rental space, including a
complete remodel of the interior
TBD
6 Public Works Facilities PW Warehouse Expansion 8794 Lion Street
Build a new warehouse with the same
footprint as the existing warehouse at
the PWSC. This will provide additional
storage for all departments
TBD
$ 19,158,561
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
7 Planning Miscellaneous Space Planning 10500 Civic Center Drive
The purpose of the project is to
determine if office space at the City Hall
building can be utilized more efficiently.
15,000$
15,000$
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
8 Community
Services
Municipal
Utilities
Central Park Backbone
Infrastructure 11200 Base Line Road Install utility infrastructure in
underdeveloped portion of Central Park. $ 5,200,000
9 Engineering Municipal
Utilities RCMU Electric Substation #3 Banyan Street/Deer Creek
Channel
RCMU Substation #3 to be
interconnected with SCE's existing
transmission/sub-transmission line and
RCMU's existing distribution line.
$ 13,000,000
PROJECTS IN THE ROUGH
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
DRAINAGE
FACILITIES
MISCELLANEOUS
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
Drainage Total:
Facilities Total:
Miscellaneous Total:
Page 202
10 Engineering Municipal
Utilities
RCMU Line Extension Design:
Etiwanda Heights
Day Creek Boulevard north of
the Firehouse Court to
Banyan Street
8,500' of new 12kV electric distribution
and fiber optic line extension to connect
RCMU's existing electric distribution and
Rancho Boradband to the new Etiwanda
Heights area.
$ 3,025,000
$ 21,225,000
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
11 Community
Services
Parks &
Recreation
Central Park Adventure
Playground 11200 Base Line Road Additional recreational facilities at
Central Park. $ 7,000,000
12 Community
Services
Parks &
Recreation Etiwanda Creek Park Phase II 5939 East Avenue Park expansion to add recreational areas
at Etiwanda Creek Park. $ 6,291,319
13 Engineering Parks &
Recreation
Bear Gulch Road
Improvements
Bear Gulch Road at Bear
Gulch Park
Construction of curb ramps and new
striping for a crosswalk from Bear Gulch
Park to Bear Gulch Elementary.
$ 237,000
14 Engineering Parks &
Recreation
Cucamonga Creek Channel
Bike Trail Connection
Cucamonga Creek Channel
From Red Hill to Valle Vista
Elementary
Construction of an asphalt trail on the
west portion of the existing trail from
Red Hill Country Club to Valle Vista
Elementary School and construction of a
concrete sidewalk.
$ 454,000
15 Public Works Parks &
Recreation
Tree Planting on the Pacific
Electric Trail Project
Pacific Electric Trail north of
Central Park
Planting 60 trees and providing irrigation
to 75 trees on the Pacific Electric Trail
north of Central Park.
TBD
$ 13,982,319
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
16 Engineering Streets Highland Ave and Kenyon
Way Bike Enhancements
Highland Avenue and Kenyon
Way
A class II/III buffered bike lane along
Highland Ave from Kenyon Way to Day
Creek Channel.
$ 270,000
17 Engineering Streets Jasper Street Curb Ramp
Improvements
Jasper Street from Orchard
Street to Hillside Road
Constructing pedestrian improvements
high-visibility crosswalk and curb ramps
at the intersections.
$ 262,800
18 Engineering Streets Mountain View Drive Street
Improvements
Mountain View Drive from
Spruce Avenue to Base Line
Road
Construction of a buffered bike lane,
median pedestrian ruge island, curb
ramps, and striping crosswalks.
$ 1,091,000
19 Engineering Streets Palo Alto Street Curb Ramp
Improvements
Palo Alto Street from
Hermosa Avenue to Marine
Avenue
Constructing high-visibility crosswalk and
curb ramps at the intersections. $ 451,300
20 Engineering Streets Pecan Avenue Street
Improvements
Pecan Avenue from Whittram
Avenue to Arrow Route
Rehabilitation of pavement and involves
new curb and gutter, sidewalk,
driveways, asphalt pavement, and
overlay.
$ 1,380,000
21 Engineering Streets Victoria Street Median
Refuge Island
Victoria Street from East
Avenue to Etiwanda High
Construction of two median refuge
islands at existing mid-block crosswalks
near the frontage of Etiwanda High
School.
$ 164,000
22 Engineering Streets Vintage Drive Street
Improvements
Vintage Drive from Milliken
Avenue to Rochester Avenue
Construction of curb ramps, new striping
for crosswalks, new striping for shoulder,
and rectangular flashing beacons.
$ 773,000
23 Engineering Streets Whittram Avenue Street
Improvements
Whittram Avenue from
Etiwanda Creek to Hickory
Avenue
Constructing drainage culvert, catch
basin, curb adjancent sidewalk,
driveway, curb and gutter, curb ramp,
new asphalt pavement, and signage and
striping.
$ 3,805,000
$ 8,197,100
Municipal Utilities Total:
Parks & Recreation Total:
Streets Total:
PARKS & RECREATION
STREETS
Page 203
No.Department Project Type Project Title Project Location Project Description Project
Estimate
-$
-$
62,577,980$
Traffic Total:
CITYWIDE TOTAL:
TRAFFIC
Page 204
Page 205
i
City of Rancho Cucamonga
GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL
LC-1
A CITY OF PLACES.
A beautiful city with a diversity and balance of unique and well-connected places.
LC-1.1 Complete Places. Ensure that a broad range of recreational,
commercial, educational, arts, cultural, and civic amenities are nearby and
easily accessible to residents and workers in each neighborhood and each
employment district.
LC-1.2 Quality of Place. Ensure that new infill development is compatible
with the existing, historic, and envisioned future character and scale of each
neighborhood.
LC-1.3 Quality of Public Space. Require that new development incorporate
the adjacent street and open space network into their design to soften the
transition between private and public realm and creating a greener more
human-scale experience.
LC-1.4 Connectivity and Mobility. Work to complete a network of
pedestrian- and bike-friendly streets and trails, designed in concert with adjacent
land uses, using the public realm to provide more access options.
LC-1.5 Master Planning. When planning a site, there must be meaningful
efforts to master plan the site so as to ensure a well-structured network and block
pattern with sufficient access and connectivity to achieve the placemaking goals
of this General Plan.
LC-1.6 Disadvantaged Communities. Prioritize development appropriate
to the needs of disadvantaged communities, particularly south of Foothill
Boulevard.
LC-1.7 Design for Safety. Require the use of Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) techniques such as providing clear lines of sight,
appropriate lighting, and wayfinding signs to ensure that new development is
visible from public areas and easy to navigate.
LC-1-8 Public Art. Require new construction to integrate public art in
accordance with the City Public Arts Program.
LC-1.9 Infill Development. Enable and encourage infill development within
vacant and underutilized properties through flexible design requirements and
potential incentives.
LAND USE & COMMUNITY CHARACTER
EXHIBIT C
Page 206
iiiii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
LC-1.10 Development Incentives. Consider incentives for new development
that provides substantial economic and placemaking benefit to the community
and prohibit the provision of incentives that outweigh the direct benefits of the
development and its use.
LC-1.11 Compatible Development. Allow flexibility in density and intensity
to address specific site conditions and ensure compatibility of new development
with adjacent context.
LC-1.12 Adaptive Reuse. Support the adaptive reuse of historic properties
consistent with neighborhood character.
LC-1.13 Improved Public Realm. Require that new development extend
the “walkable public realm” into previously vacant and/or parking lot-dominant
large single-use parcels of land.
LC-1.14 Street Amenities and Lighting. Modify pedestrian and street
amenities, lighting styles and intensities to be compatible with the character of
the surrounding neighborhoods.
LC-1.15 Historic Route 66. Build on the history and significance of Historic
Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) by incorporating design features, such as public
art, signage, and architecture, that reflect its history and heritage.
LC-1.16 Healthy Development. Ensure that the design and development
of our communities supports the health and well-being of our residents. Use the
Healthy Development Checklist, or similar assessment tool, to assess the overall
health performance and supportiveness of new development projects.
GOAL
LC-2
HUMAN SCALED.
A city planned and designed for people fostering social and economic interaction,
an active and vital public realm, and high levels of public safety and comfort.
LC-2.1 Building Orientation. Require that buildings be sited near the street
and organized with the more active functions —entries, lobbies, bike parking,
offices, employee break rooms and outdoor lunch areas—facing toward and
prominently visible from the street and visitor parking areas.
LC-2.2 Active Frontages. Require new development abutting streets and
other public spaces to face the public realm with attractive building facades,
and entries to encourage walking, biking, and public transit as primary—not
“alternative”—mobility modes.
LC-2.3 Streetscape. Enhance the pedestrian experience through streetscape
improvements such as enhanced street lighting, street trees, and easement
dedications to increase the widths of the sidewalks, provide side access parking
lanes, and other pedestrian and access amenities.
LC-2.4 Tree Planting. Require the planting of predominantly native and
drought-tolerant trees that shade the sidewalks, buffer pedestrians from traffic,
define the public spaces of streets, and moderate high temperatures and wind
speeds throughout the city.
LC-2.5 Gradual Transitions. Where adjacent to existing and planned
residential housing, require that new development of a larger form or intensity,
transition gradually to complement the adjacent residential uses.
LC-2.6 Commercial Requirements. Require development projects in non-
residential and mixed-use areas to provide for enhanced pedestrian activity
through the following techniques:
• Require that the ground floor of buildings where retail uses are allowed
have a minimum 15 feet floor to floor height.
• Require that the ground floor of the building occupy the majority of the lot’s
front, with exceptions for vehicular access where necessary.
• Require that most of the linear ground floor retail frontage (where such
occurs) be visually and physically “open” to the street, incorporating
windows and other design treatments to create an engaging street front.
• Minimize vehicle movements across the sidewalk.
• Allow for and encourage the development of outdoor plazas and dining
areas.
LC-2.7 Shared Parking. Encourage structured and shared parking solutions
that ensure that parking lots do not dominate street fronts and are screened
from public views whenever possible.
LC-2.8 Landscaping. Require development projects to incorporate high
quality, predominantly native and drought-tolerant landscaping to extend and
enhance the green space network of the city.
LC-2.9 Buffer Zones. Require development projects to incorporate buffer
zones when determined to be necessary or desirable to serve as managed
open space for wildfire safety and vegetation fuel modification.
LC-2.10 Pedestrian-Oriented Auto-Dependent Uses. Require auto
dependent uses such as drive-throughs, car washes, automobile service
stations, and similar auto-focused businesses, to be designed with buildings
oriented toward the primary street and the auto-servicing use/activity in
the rear. Prohibit auto-dependent uses from locating in pedestrian-priority
environments, such as City Centers, Traditional Town Centers, and all
Neighborhoods.
EXHIBIT E
Page 207
viv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-3
FISCALLY SUSTAINABLE.
A fiscally sound and sustainable City.
LC-2.11 Park-Once. Allow and encourage strategies that enable adjacent
uses and properties to flexibly share parking facilities, so that users can park
once and pursue multiple activities on foot before returning to their car, such as:
• Unbundling parking from development.
• Considering parking “districts” demonstrating sufficient parking within a
convenient walking distance.
• Design parking facilities to be architecturally compatible and integrated
with adjacent buildings so as to not dominate or detract from the character
of the area.
LC-3.1 Community Value. Actively manage growth and investments in the
community to maximize the value of new development, seeking value-per-acre
outcomes of up to six times higher.
LC-3.2 Community Benefit. Require a community benefit and economic
analysis for large projects that abut existing neighborhoods or for any project at
the maximum density, with a focus on resolving physical, economic, long-term
fiscal, and aesthetic impacts.
LC-3.3 Community Amenities. Balance the impacts of new development,
density, and urbanization through the provision of a high-level of neighborhood
and community amenities and design features.
LC-3.4 Institutional Land Uses. Site new institutional land uses based on
all forms of access available to the service population. Satellite offices that are
disbursed in the community may be necessary to ensure equitable access.
LC-3.5 Efficient Growth. Manage growth in a manner that is fiscally
sustainable, paced with the availability of infrastructure, and protects and/
or enhances community value. Discourage growth and development that will
impact the City’s ability to sustainably maintain infrastructure and services.
LC-3.6 Diverse Economy. Guide development and public investments to
maintain a fiscally sound city with a diverse and sustainable tax base.
LC-3.7 Developing Our Economy. Actively promote and encourage
opportunities for local economic development, education, housing, locally
hiring, internships and employment from cradle to career so as to increase
resident retention, improve and grow a strong local economy, achieve a positive
jobs-housing match; retain critical educational resources and human capital,
reduce regional commuting, gas consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
and ensure equitable opportunities for all residents of the City and region to
thrive.
LC-3.8 Jobs-housing match. Encourage new employment generating uses
and businesses that improve the jobs-housing match in the city.
LC-3.9 Infrastructure Funding. Actively investigate and support new
funding mechanisms that enable the City to maintain services and infrastructure.
Discourage the formation of bonded Community Facilities Districts unless there
are compelling and substantial wide-spread community benefits.
LC-3.10 Economic Synergy. Encourage businesses and development
that will support and/or enhance the operations of existing businesses when
complimentary to the General Plan Vision while discouraging new development
and businesses that will have detrimental impacts to existing businesses and
development.
GOAL
LC-4
COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS.
A diverse range of unique neighborhoods, each of which provides an equitable
range of housing types and choices with a mix of amenities and services that
support active, healthy lifestyles.
LC-4.1 Neighborhood Preservation. Preserve and enhance the character
of existing residential neighborhoods.
LC-4.2 Complete Neighborhoods. Strive to ensure that all new
neighborhoods, and infill development within or adjacent to existing
neighborhoods, are complete and well-structured such that the physical layout,
and land use mix promote walking to services, biking and transit use, and have
the following characteristics:
• Be organized into human-scale, walkable blocks, with a high level of
connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles.
• Be organized in relation to one or more focal activity centers, such as a
park, school, civic building, or neighborhood retail, such that most homes
are no further than one-quarter mile.
• Require development patterns such that 60 percent of dwelling units are
within 1/2-mile walking distance to neighborhood goods and services.
• Provide as wide a diversity of housing styles and types as possible, and
appropriate to the existing neighborhood context.
• Provide homes with entries and windows facing the street, with driveways
and garages generally deemphasized in the streetscape composition.
LC-4.3 Connected Neighborhoods. Require that each new increment
of residential development make all possible street, trail, and open space
connections to existing adjoining residential or commercial development and
provide for future connections into any adjoining parcels.
EXHIBIT E
Page 208
viivi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-5
CONNECTED CORRIDORS.
A citywide network of transportation and open space corridors that provides a
high level of connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, motorists, and
transit users.
LC-4.4 Balanced Neighborhoods. Within the density ranges and housing
types defined in this General Plan, promote a range of housing and price levels
within each neighborhood to accommodate diverse ages and incomes.
LC-4.5 Equitable Housing Opportunities and Diversity of Housing
Types. Within the density ranges and housing types defined in this General
Plan, promote a diversity of land tenure opportunities to provide a range of
choices on the types of property estate available and ready access to an
equitable array of opportunities at a variety of price points. For projects five
acres or larger, require that diverse housing types be provided and intermixed
rather than segregated by dwelling type.
LC-4.6 Block Length. Require new neighborhoods to be designed with blocks
no longer than 600 feet nor a perimeter exceeding 1,800 feet. Exceptions can
be made if mid-block pedestrian and bicycle connections are provided, or if the
neighborhood is on the edge of town and is intended to have a rural or semi-
rural design character.
LC-4.7 Intersection Density. Require new neighborhoods to provide
high levels of intersection density. Neighborhood Center and Semi-Rural
Neighborhoods should provide approximately 400 intersections per square
mile. Suburban Neighborhoods should provide at least 200 intersections per
square mile.
LC-4.8 Solar Orientation. Street, block, and lot layouts should orient a
majority of lots within 20 degrees of a north-south orientation for increased
energy conservation.
LC-4.9 Public Art. Encourage public art that reflects the culture, history, and
character of the surrounding neighborhood.
LC-4.10 Minimize Curb Cuts. Require new commercial development, and
residential to the extent possible, to have common driveways and/or service
lanes and alleys serving multiple units, to minimize the number of curb cuts
along any given block to improve pedestrian safety.
LC-4.11 Neighborhood Transitions. Require that new neighborhoods
provide appropriate transitions in scale, building type and density between
different General Plan designations, Place Types and Community Planning
Areas.
LC-4.12 Conventional Suburban Neighborhood Design. Discourage
the construction of new residential neighborhoods that are characterized by
sound walls on any streets, discontinuous cul-de-sac street patterns, long block
lengths, single building and housing types, and lack of walking or biking access
to parks, schools, goods, and services.
LC-4.13 Neighborhood Edges. Encourage neighborhood edges along
street corridors to be characterized by active frontages, whether single-family or
multifamily residential, or by ground floor, neighborhood-service non-residential
uses. Where this is not possible due to existing development patterns or
envisioned streetscape character, neighborhood edges shall be designed based
on the following policies:
• Strongly discourage the construction of new gated communities except in
Semi-Rural Neighborhoods.
• Allow the use of sound walls to buffer new neighborhoods from existing
sources of noise pollution such as railroads and limited access roadways.
Consider sound walls as sites for public art.
• Prohibit the use of sound walls to buffer residential areas from arterial or
collector streets. Instead design approaches such as building setbacks,
landscaping and other techniques shall be used.
• In the case where sound walls might be acceptable, require pedestrian
access points to improve access from the Neighborhoods to nearby
commercial, educational, and recreational amenities, activity centers and
transit stops.
• Discourage the use of signs to distinguish one residential project from
another. Strive for neighborhoods to blend seamlessly into one another. If
provided, gateways should be landmarks and urban design focal points, not
advertisements for home builders.
LC-5.1 Improved Street Network. Systematically extend and complete
a network of complete streets to ensure a high-level of multi-modal connectivity
within and between adjacent Neighborhoods, Centers and Districts. Plan and
implement targeted improvements to the quality and number of pedestrian and
bicycle routes within the street and trail network, prioritizing connections to
schools, parks, and neighborhood activity centers.
LC-5.2 Connections Between Development Projects. Require
the continuation and connectivity of the street network between adjacent
development projects and discourage the use of cul-de-sacs or other dead-end
routes.
EXHIBIT E
Page 209
ixviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-7
ROBUST DISTRICTS.
A series of unique, employment-oriented environments for a range of business
activities, shopping and entertainment, arts and culture activities, and community
events and gathering.
LC-5.3 Green Public Realm. Ensure that a significant tree canopy and
landscaping is provided along corridors, and linkages between land uses, to
provide shade and wind protection for pedestrians and bicyclists, and to define
these corridors as the “outdoor living rooms” of the City.
LC-5.4 Multi Family Development. Focus new multifamily housing
development along corridors between commercial nodes and centers and
ensure that it is well-connected to adjoining neighborhoods and centers by high
quality walking and biking routes.
LC-5.5 Foothill Boulevard as a Gateway. Transform the ends of Foothill
Boulevard near the city boundary to a unique gateway environment through
street improvements and coordinated infill development along both sides of
Foothill Boulevard.
LC-5.6 Foothill Boulevard as a Connector. Transition Foothill Boulevard
from a “divider” to a “connector” that brings the north and south sides together.
Ensure that new development along the Foothill Corridor generates a high-
quality pedestrian- and transit-oriented environment and a concentration of
commercial and civic amenities and community gathering places for residents
from all parts of the city.
LC-5.7 Public Arts Master Plan. Develop a citywide master plan that
integrates the arts into the transportation, trails, open space and greenways
network to enhance the public realm and creatively connect communities
through innovative arts and cultural amenities and programming.
LC-5.8 Equestrian Uses. Continue to protect equestrian uses and to
implement the Equestrian Overlay Zone.
GOAL
LC-6
ACTIVE CENTERS.
A rich variety of commercial and mixed-use centers throughout the city, which
bring a range of opportunities for shopping, dining, recreations, commerce,
employment, arts and culture within easy reach of all neighborhoods.
LC-6.1 Diverse Centers. Encourage the development of neighborhood-
serving, community-serving and city-wide serving centers that address the full
range community needs and market sectors.
LC-6.2 Small Scale Centers. Support one or more very small-scale Centers
on well-located under-developed parcels within walking, biking, or horseback
riding distance of neighborhoods in Alta Loma and Etiwanda.
LC-6.3 Evolving Centers. Encourage the improvement of existing
commercial centers to provide more active, human scale environments and
community gathering places, including the potential for infill housing and office
use.
LC-6.4 Access to Transit. Encourage the development of commercial and
mixed-use centers that are located at and organized in relation to existing or
planned transit stops, especially along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
LC-6.5 Walkable Environments. Centers should include very walkable and
pedestrian-friendly streets with active building fronts along primary corridors
and internal streets. In some cases, side access lanes may be inserted between
existing major streets and building fronts, providing a low-speed environment
that is very safe and comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists, with pedestrian-
oriented frontages.
LC-6.6 Outdoor Commerce. Encourage outdoor activities such as farmers
markets, small performances, visual arts and culture events, dining, and gatherings
that take advantage of the Centers and the relation to the public realm.
LC-7.1 Gateway & Employment Hub. Establish the Central South
Community Planning Area as the City’s main “gateway from the I-10 Freeway”
and an employment hub of regional significance. Haven Avenue and 4th
Street, in particular, is a significant gateway location that is envisioned as a
higher intensity urban environment with iconic architecture and a mix of uses
that can include luxury or full-service hotel, high rise office building, fine dining
restaurant, and/or a public recreation amenity in addition to higher density
residential uses.
LC-7.2 Unify and Connect Development. Require that new development
in the 21st Century Employment District land use designation unify and connect
development along the Haven Avenue Corridor.
LC-7.3 Campus Design. Encourage employment areas to be developed like
a college campus with buildings oriented toward an internal roadway, buffer
landscaping along the perimeter, and ample opportunities for paths and trails
connecting to the City system, as well as relaxation areas for employees.
LC-7.4 Compatibility. Discourage large industrial projects within 1,000 feet
of existing and planned residential development.
LC-7.5 Adaptive Industrial Reuse. Encourage adaptive reuse with
residential and live/work units, and local serving commercial, in existing
industrial structures, particularly in the Central South Community Planning Area.
LC-7.6 Loading Docks. Require that parking lots, loading docks, outdoor
storage, and processing, be located behind or beside buildings, not in front,
and be screened from public views.
EXHIBIT E
Page 210
xix | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
OS-2
TRAILS.
A complete, connected network of diverse trails and connected open space that
improves access to all areas of the city and encourages non-motorized activities.
OS-1.1 Equitable Access to Parks. Strive to ensure that at least one park
or other public open space is within safe, comfortable walk from homes and
jobs, without crossing major streets except at signalized crossings. Equitable
access to parks should be determined based on the fundamental character
of the place (rural, suburban, urban) and corresponding transportation
infrastructure.
OS-1.2 Underserved Communities. Prioritize the provision of new
trails, parks, plazas, and other open space types in areas of the city that are
underserved by parks, services, and amenities.
OS-1.3 Accessible Parks. Require parks be designed with special attention
to usability by and safety for small children, seniors, and those with mobility,
sight, hearing or other special needs.
OS-1.4 Design Character and Public Art. Require neighborhood
parks, greens, and playgrounds to be designed as an integral element of their
Community Planning Area, reflecting the design character, art, and culture, of
that neighborhood, center or district.
OS-1.5 Design for Safety. Require the use of Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) design techniques such as providing clear lines
of sight, appropriate lighting, and wayfinding signs to ensure that parks are
safe and easy to navigate.
OS-1.6 New Development. Ensure that new residential and non-residential
developments provide adequate on-site recreational and open space amenities
consistent with applicable General Plan Designations, and the needs of new
development.
OS-1.7 New Parks. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that
meet the City standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special
facilities) for every 1,000 persons.
OS-1.8 Central Park. Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the
Central Park Master Plan.
OS-1.9 Joint Use. Pursue and expand joint use of public lands that are
available and suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility properties.
GOAL
OS-1
OPEN SPACE.
A complete, connected network of diverse parks, trails, and rural and natural
open space that support a wide variety of recreational, educational, and outdoor
activities.
OPEN SPACE
OS-1.10 Buffer Zones. Provide buffer zones, as appropriate and necessary,
to serve as managed open space for wildfire safety and vegetation fuel
modification. Buffer zones may include trails, small recreational amenities,
information kiosks and signage, and even staging points for fire vehicles.
OS-1.11 Locally Grown Food. Support small-scale locally grown food in
front/backyard gardens, community gardens, parks/open space areas, and
utility and flood control easements.
OS-2.1 Trail Corridors. Extend, improve and complete the multi-purpose
trail network, wherever possible, by utilizing existing flood control channel and
utility corridor rights-of-way as public trail corridors.
OS-2.2 Connectivity. Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the
San Bernardino National Forest and other hillside open space areas.
OS-2.3 Trailheads. Provide trailhead amenities such as parking, restrooms,
information boards, and maps.
OS-2.4 Equestrian Trails. Continue to maintain and pursue the development
of planned trails and facilities for equestrian use.
OS-2.5 Utility Corridors. Preserve the primary function of utility corridors
while providing every reasonable opportunity for shared public use for active
mobility and recreational purposes.
OS-2.6 Design for Heat. Consider extreme heat in the design of streets,
parks, trails, and playgrounds to support activity throughout the year and in all
weather conditions by including shade trees, shade structures, water fountains,
splash pads, lighting for night play in most spaces.
OS-2.7 Access. Require new development to provide access to existing or
future trails and provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking
fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities).
OS-2.8 Art and Education. Require public art, education, and recreation
features on trails, where appropriate.
OS-2.9 Trail and Park Sponsorship. Support the creation of partnerships
with organizations to sponsor and maintain green spaces, parks, trails, and
community gardens.
EXHIBIT E
Page 211
xiiixii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
MA-1
REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB.
A multimodal transportation hub that connects regional and local destinations.
MOBILITY AND ACCESS
MA-1.1 Transportation Leadership. Take a leadership role in local and
regional transportation related planning and decision making.
MA-1.2 Cucamonga Station Redevelopment. Support redevelopment in
and around the Cucamonga Station to support transit-oriented development.
MA-1.3 Funding. Support federal, statewide, and regional infrastructure
funding for transit and transportation.
MA-1.4 Local Mobility Hub. Require new development at mobility hubs
and key stops along the future bus rapid transit and future transit circulator
system to facilitate first mile/last mile connectivity to neighborhoods.
MA-1.5 Provide Mobility Options. Provide roadway connections and
local mobility hubs designed to capture 80% of the population and employment
south of Base Line Road.
MA-1.6 Boulevard Implementation. Require boulevards with high-quality
transit to not only account for how transit service is impacted by the geometry
of the corridor, but also by signal timing, signal phasing, turns, and other
operations that may jeopardize the quality of service.
GOAL
MA-2
ACCESS FOR ALL.
A safe, efficient, accessible, and equitable transportation system that serves the
mobility needs of all users.
MA-2.1 Complete Streets. Require that new roadways include provisions
for complete streets, balancing the needs of all users of all ages and
capabilities.
MA-2.2 New Streets. To achieve the vision for transportation and mobility in
the city, the final design, location, and alignment of streets shall provide levels
of access, connectivity, and circulation consistent with the conceptual layouts
shown in this Mobility and Access Chapter.
MA-2.3 Street Design. Implement innovative street and intersection designs
to maximize efficiency and safety in the city. Use traffic calming tools to assist
in implementing complete street principles. Possible tools include roundabouts,
curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and separated bicycle infrastructure.
MA-2.4 Street Connectivity. Require connectivity and accessibility to a mix
of land uses that meets residents’ daily needs within walking distance.
MA-2.5 Street Vacations. Prioritize pedestrian and utility connectivity over
street vacations.
MA-2.6 Context. Ensure that complete streets applications integrate the
neighborhood and community identity into the street design. This can include
special provisions for pedestrians and bicycles.
MA-2.7 Roadway Scale. Balance roadway size and design configuration
to ensure that vehicular speeds, volumes and turning movements do not
compromise the safety and comfort of pedestrians and bicyclists.
MA-2.8 Facility Service Levels. Maintain level of service (LOS) D for
priority modes on each street; LOS E or F may be acceptable at intersections
or segments for modes that are not prioritized. The City will develop a list
of intersections and roadways that are protected from this level of service
policy where 1) maintaining the standard would be a disincentive to walking,
biking or transit; 2) constructing facilities would prevent the City from VMT
reduction goals or other priorities, and ; 3) maintaining the standard would be
incompatible with adjacent land uses and built forms.
MA-2.9 High-Quality Pedestrian Environment. Enhance sidewalks
to create a high-quality pedestrian environment, including wider sidewalks,
improved pedestrian crossings, buffers between sidewalks and moving traffic,
pedestrian lighting, wayfinding signage, shade trees, increased availability of
benches, end of cul-de-sac access, etc.
MA-2.10 Block Pattern. Require development projects to arrange streets in
an interconnected block pattern, so that pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers are
not forced onto arterial streets for inter- or intra- neighborhood travel.
MA-2.11 Master Planning. Master plan sites so as to ensure a well-
structured network and block pattern with sufficient access and connectivity;
especially in all focus areas, including the Cucamonga Town Center, Etiwanda
Heights Town Center, and the Southeast Industrial Area.
MA-2.12 Transportation Demand Management. Require new projects
to implement Transportation Demand Management strategies, such as employer
provided transit pass/parking credit, high-speed communications infrastructure
for telecommuting, carpooling incentives, etc.
MA-2.13 Healthy Mobility. Provide pedestrian facilities and class II
buffered bike lanes (or separated bikeways) on auto-priority streets where
feasible to promote active transportation.
MA-2.14 Bicycle Facilities. Enhance bicycle facilities by maintaining and
expanding the bicycle network, providing end-of-trip facilities (bike parking,
lockers, showers), improving bicycle/transit integration, wayfinding signage,
etc.
EXHIBIT E
Page 212
xvxiv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
MA-3
SAFETY.
A transportation network that adapts to changing mobility needs while preserving
sustainable community values.
MA-3.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks. Maintain the Active
Transportation Plan supporting safe routes to school, and a convenient
network of identified pedestrian and bicycle routes with access to major
employment centers, shopping districts, regional transit centers, and residential
neighborhoods.
MA-3.2 Traffic Safety. Prioritize transportation system improvements that
help eliminate traffic-related fatalities and severe injury collisions.
MA-3.3 Vulnerable User Safety. Prioritize pedestrian improvements in the
Pedestrian Priority Area to promote safety in the southwest area of the city.
MA-3.4 Emergency Access. Prioritize development and infrastructure
investments that work to implement, maintain, and enhance emergency access
throughout the community.
GOAL
MA-4
GOODS MOVEMENT.
An efficient goods movement system that ensures timely deliveries without
compromising quality of life, safety and smooth traffic flow for residents and
businesses.
MA-4.1 Truck Network. Avoid designating truck routes that use collector or
local streets that primarily serve residential uses and other sensitive receptors.
MA-4.2 Southeast Area Connectivity. Require new development in the
Southeast Area to provide the necessary infrastructure to maintain access and
public safety.
MA-4.3 Future Logistics Technology. Support and plan for electrification
and autonomy of the truck fleet.
MA-4.4 Rail Access. Avoid abandonment of rail access to industrial parcels
or utilize such right of way to balance and enhance other connectivity goals
within the City (such as pedestrian/bicycle trails).
MA-4.5 Grade Separation. Support the construction of grade separations
of roadways and trails from rail lines.
GOAL
MA-5
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION.
A transportation network that adapts to changing mobility needs.
MA-5.1 Land Use Supporting Reduced VMT. Work to reduce VMT
through land use planning, enhanced transit access, localized attractions, and
access to non-automotive modes.
MA-5.2 Emerging Technologies. Prioritize investments in critical
infrastructure and pilot programs to leverage proven new transportation
technology.
MA-5.3 Funding. Remain flexible in the pursuit and adoption of
transportation funding mechanisms that fund innovative transportation solutions.
MA-5.4 Intelligent Systems Preparation. Upgrade the City’s ATMS
and communications systems to ensure that the City meets the intelligent
transportation system demands of today while planning for future demands
associated with AVs and CVs.
GOAL
H-1
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES.
A diverse community with a broad range of housing types and opportunities to
accommodate expected new households.
HOUSING
H-1.1 RHNA Requirement. Encourage the development of a wide range of
housing options, types, and prices that will enable the City to achieve its share
of the RHNA.
H-1.2 Elderly and Disabled Household Needs. Recognize the unique
characteristics of elderly and disabled households and address their special needs.
H-1.3 Accessory Dwelling Units. Facilitate the development of accessory
dwelling units to provide additional housing opportunities pursuant to State law
and established zoning regulations.
GOAL
H-2
AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
A city where housing opportunities meet the needs of all socioeconomic segments
of the community.
H-2.1 Rental Assistance Programs. Encourage the use of rental
assistance programs to assist lower income households and support the Housing
Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) applications for additional
vouchers to meet the needs of lower income households.
EXHIBIT E
Page 213
xviixvi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
H-3
HOMELESSNESS.
A compassionate community with a wide range of options and support for the
housing insecure and those experiencing homelessness.
H-3.1 Homeless Services. Provide assistance as it becomes available
towards efforts of local organizations and community groups to provide
emergency shelters, transitional housing opportunities, and services to the City’s
homeless population and those at-risk of homelessness.
H-3.2 Homeless Programs. Participate with adjacent communities toward
the provision of a sub-regional shelter program and encourage the County to
develop a comprehensive homeless program.
H-2.2 Mobile Home Park Accord. Support the Mobile Home Park Accord
voluntary rent stabilization as a means of keeping rents at reasonable levels.
GOAL
H-4
HOUSING QUALITY.
A community with quality, healthy housing.
H-4.1 Mills Act Contracts. Encourage rehabilitation and preservation of
historic residences through participation in Mills Act contracts.
H-4.2 Substandard Housing. Encourage the revitalization and
rehabilitation of substandard residential structures.
H-4.3 Residential Rehabilitation. Focus rehabilitation to neighborhoods
with deteriorating units.
H-4.4 Home Improvement Programs. Implement the Home Improvement
Programs to benefit lower income single-family homeowners and mobile
homeowners.
H-4.5 Housing Maintenance. Actively encourage the maintenance of
existing housing in to as to maintain the housing stock in sound condition.
H-4.6 Code Enforcement. Utilize concentrated Code Enforcement programs
to target specific areas or problems when the need and community support
warrants such activity.
GOAL
H-5
GOVERNMENT CONSTRAINTS.
A city with an efficient process for improving and developing housing.
H-5.1 Development Review Processes. Consider new polices, codes,
and procedures that have the potential to reduce procedural delays, provide
information early in the development process regarding development costs,
and charge only those fees necessary to adequately carry out needed public
services and improvements.
H-5.2 Fee Schedule. Periodically review and update the City’s fee schedule
and the methodology on which the fees are based to determine the necessary
costs for providing adequate public services and public improvements to ensure
the continued health, safety, and welfare of the community.
H-5.3 Development Review Process. Facilitate the development review
process for new housing through multiple techniques, including staff assistance,
public information, articles in the City’s newsletter, informal meetings with
applicants, and Preliminary Review applications to address technical issues and
facilitate the production of quality housing.
H-5.4 Development Standards. Evaluate and adjust as appropriate
residential development standards, regulations, and processing procedures
that are determined to constrain housing development, particularly housing
opportunities for lower and moderate income households and for persons with
special needs.
GOAL
H-6
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES.
An equitable community that provides equal housing opportunities for all residents.
H-6.1 Reduce Housing Discrimination. Explore and consider programs
that will reduce the incidence of housing discrimination within the City.
H-6.2 Land Use Plan. Facilitate development projects that will improve a
neighborhood’s access to resources and opportunities.
H-6.3 Fair Housing Outreach and Education. Support outreach and
education efforts to actively further fair housing practices and understanding
of fair housing rights, with emphasis on proactive education and voluntary
compliance, as well as through legal enforcement on a case-by-case basis,
including, but not limited to, assistance with the resolution of tenant/landlord
disputes and housing discrimination complaints.
H-6.4 Accessible or Barrier-Free Housing. Encourage the provisions of
disabled-accessible units and housing for the mentally and physically disabled.
EXHIBIT E
Page 214
xixxviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
PF-1
STATE-OF-THE-ART FACILITIES.
Residents enjoy state-of-the-art public and community facilities that support existing
programs, accommodate future needs, and are accessible to all members of the
community.
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SERVICES
PF-1.1 New Building Standards. Continue to implement high-quality
standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings.
PF-1.2 Underserved Neighborhoods. Prioritize new community facilities
in underserved neighborhoods and centers.
PF-1.3 Facility Collaboration. Maximize public facility use by sharing with
nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look for
opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private
organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs.
PF-1.4 Capital Improvements Program. Coordinate, plan, and
manage a comprehensive capital improvements program for expansion and
improvement of critical facilities and infrastructure in response to the needs of a
growing community.
GOAL
PF-2
EDUCATION.
All residents have access to high-quality educational opportunities.
PF-2.1 Schools. Consider the needs of the school districts that serve Rancho
Cucamonga in future planning and development activities.
PF-2.2 Colleges. Partner with local public and private schools and Chaffey
Community College to maintain effective educational, vocational, and
workforce programs for all residents.
GOAL
PF-3
LIBRARIES.
High-quality library resources are provided to meet the educational, cultural, civic,
and general business needs of all residents.
PF-3.1 Library. Continue to improve the local libraries system, complete with
community facilities that provide knowledgeable, service-oriented staff and
offer access to information, books, and other materials in a variety of formats,
including emerging technologies. Consider future options for providing library
services that are flexible and will maximize library services while keeping costs
affordable.
GOAL
PF-4
ANIMAL CARE.
Animal care and services are provided, including facilitation of adoptions,
promotion of animal health and safety, and animal awareness education.
PF-4.1 Animal Care. Continue to maintain and improve the Animal Care
and Adoption Center facility.
GOAL
PF-5
WATER-RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE.
Water and wastewater infrastructure facilities are available to support future
growth needs and existing development.
PF-5.1 Water Treatment. Support the efforts of the Cucamonga Valley
Water District (CVWD) and San Bernardino County agencies to provide and
expand water treatment facilities to treat local water sources from canyon
surface waters and groundwater.
PF-5.2 Wastewater Treatment. Consult with the Inland Empire Utilities
Agency and CVWD to ensure that the treatment facility has sufficient capacity
to meet future wastewater treatment needs.
PF-5.3 Recycled Water. Work with the CVWD to expand the recycled water
program to include existing private development.
GOAL
PF-6
SOLID WASTE.
The volume of solid waste that enters regional landfills is minimized and the
amount of recycling increased.
PF-6.1 Recycling. Encourage Recycling and Organics collection and
processing in all sectors of the community to divert items from entering landfills.
PF-6.2 Refuse Facilities. Consult with public agencies and private
contractors to ensure adequate organics processing facilities are available.
GOAL
PF-7
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.
Protect and expand utility infrastructure in a sustainable and innovative manner
to serve the current and future needs of the community while ensuring that natural
and environmental resources are available for future generations.
PF-7.1Communications. Expand access to high quality established and
emerging communications technologies for individuals, businesses, educational
institutions, and government functions.
EXHIBIT E
Page 215
xxixx | General Plan Annual Report 2023
PF-7.2 High Speed Internet. Prioritize extending high speed internet into
underserved lower income neighborhoods.
PF-7.3 Utility Equipment. To the extent possible, ensure that utility boxes,
above-ground equipment, and utility entrances to buildings are located at the
rear or side of the building, not the front. Ensure that utility boxes and other
above-ground equipment do not block or impair the safe and effective use of
trails, sidewalks, and streets.
PF-7.4 Planned Streets Segments and Utility Facilities. When
planned street segments, as shown in the Focus Areas and Mobility & Access
chapters, would unreasonably interfere with the primary utility function on utility
owned parcels, allow the final location and design of those street segments to
accommodate the current and prospective utility needs of the community to the
greatest extent possible.
PF-7.5 Secondary (Non-Utility) Uses of Utility Facilities and Sites.
Ensure compatibility of secondary uses on utility owned parcels that are not
related to the primary utility function of utility owned parcels with adjacent land
uses and the utility needs of the community.
PF-7.6 Phasing of Public Facilities. Require new parks, open spaces,
infrastructure, and other facilities be funded by and/or provided by new
development as necessary so as to ensure services can be provided to new
development.
GOAL
RC-1 VISUAL RESOURCES.
A beautiful city with stunning views of the San Gabriel Mountains and the
Inland Empire.
RC-1.1 View Corridors. Protect and preserve existing signature public views
of the mountains and the valleys along roadways, open space corridors, and at
other key locations.
RC-1.2 Orient toward View Corridors. Encourage new development to
orient views toward view corridors, valley and mountains.
RC-1.3 Transfer of Development Rights. Allow the transfer of development
rights from conservation areas to select development areas throughout the city
and Sphere of Influence to protect hillsides, natural resources, and views and to
avoid hazards and further the City’s conservation goals.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
RC-1.4 Dark Sky. Limit light pollution from outdoor sources, especially in the
rural, neighborhood, hillside, and open spaces to maintain darkness for night
sky viewing.
RC-1.5 Transit Corridor Views. Require that new development along major
transit routes and travel corridors include 360-project design and landscape
or design screening of outdoor activity, and storage, including views from the
transit routes and travel corridors.
RC-1.6 Hillside Grading. Grading of hillsides shall be minimized, following
natural landform to the maximum extent possible. Retaining walls shall be
discouraged and if necessary screened from view.
RC-1.7 Preservation of Natural Land Features. Preserve significant
natural features and incorporate into all developments. Such features may
include ridges, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, wetland and
riparian areas, steep topography, important or landmark trees and views.
GOAL
RC-2
WATER RESOURCES.
Reliable, readily available, and sustainable water supplies for the community and
natural environment.
RC-2.1 Water Supplies. Protect lands critical to replenishment of
groundwater supplies and local surface waters.
RC-2.2 Groundwater Recharge. Preserve and enhance the existing system
of stormwater capture for groundwater recharge.
RC-2.3 Riparian Resources. Promote the retention and protection of natural
stream courses from encroachment, erosion, and polluted urban runoff.
RC-2.4 Waterways as Amenities. When considering new development
applications and infrastructure improvements where waterways are on-site,
adjacent, or nearby, incorporate the waterway into the design as a feature.
RC-2.5 Water Conservation. Require the use of cost-effective methods
to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water
conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences.
RC-2.6 Irrigation. Encourage the conversion of water-intensive turf/
landscape areas to landscaping that uses climate- and wildfire-appropriate
native or non-invasive plants, efficient irrigation systems, greywater, and water
efficient site maintenance.
RC-2.7Greywater. Allow and encourage the use of greywater to meet or
offset on-site non-potable water demand.
EXHIBIT E
Page 216
xxiiixxii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-3
HABITAT CONSERVATION.
Wildlife habitats that support various plants, mammals, and other wildlife species.
RC-3.1 Sensitive Habitat. Encourage the preservation of the integrity of
sensitive land resources that have significant native vegetation and/or habitat
value such as riparian habitat areas, creek corridors, Riversidean Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub (RAFSS), wetlands, and sensitive wildlife habitat that supports
biological resources.
RC-3.2 Biological Preserves. Allow and encourage the expansion of
sensitive biological preserve areas (e.g., North Etiwanda Preserve, Day Creek
Preserve, and San Sevaine Preserve) and other important habitat areas with
an emphasis on wildlife connectivity between habitats and connectivity to the
national forest.
RC-3.3 Wildlife Corridors. Encourage the creation, maintenance, and
protection of open space areas that provide strategic wildlife corridors and vital
connectivity between habitat areas.
RC-3.4 Landscape Design. Encourage new development to incorporate
native vegetation materials into landscape plans and prohibit the use of species
known to be invasive according to the California Invasive Plant Inventory.
RC-3.5 Buffers from New Development. Require new developments
adjacent to identified plant and wildlife habitat areas to establish and maintain
a protective buffer.
RC-3.6 Grading and Vegetation Removal. Limit grading and vegetation
removal of new development activities to the minimum extent necessary for
construction and to reduce erosion and sedimentation.
RC-3.7 Urban Forestry Plan. Minimize damage associated with wind- and
fire-related hazards and risks and address climate change and urban heat
island effects through the development of an urban forestry plan that addresses
and proper and appropriate landscaping, plant and tree selection and
replacement, planting and vegetation management techniques.
GOAL
RC-4
CULTURAL RESOURCES.
A community rich with historic and cultural resources.
RC-4.1 Disturbance of Human Remains. In areas where there is a high
chance that human remains may be present, the City will require proposed
projects to conduct a survey to establish occurrence of human remains, and
measures to prevent impacts to human remains if found.
RC-4.2 Discovery of Human Remains. Require that any human remains
discovered during implementation of public and private projects within the city
be treated with respect and dignity and fully comply with the California Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and other appropriate laws.
RC-4.3 Protected Sites. Require sites with significant cultural resources to be
protected.
RC-4.4 Preservation of Historic Resources. Encourage the preservation
of historic resources, buildings, and landscapes.
RC-4.5 Historic Buildings. Encourage the feasible rehabilitation and
adaptive reuse of older buildings.
RC-4.6 Paleontological Resources. Require any paleontological artifacts
found within the city or the Sphere of Influence to be preserved, reported, and
offered for curation at local museums or research facilities.
GOAL
RC-5
LOCAL AIR QUALITY.
Healthy air quality for all residents.
RC-5.1 Pollutant Sources. Minimize increases of new air pollutant emissions
in the city and encourage the use of advance control technologies and clean
manufacturing techniques.
RC-5.2 Air Quality Land Use Compatibility. Avoid siting of homes,
schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities and land uses within 500 feet of land
uses that are considered large emitters.
RC-5.3 Barriers and Buffers. Require design features such as site and
building orientation, trees or other landscaped barriers, artificial barriers,
ventilation and filtration, construction, and operational practices to reduce air
quality impacts during construction and operation of large stationary and mobile
sources.
RC-5.4 Health Risk Assessment. Consider the health impacts of
development of sensitive receptors within 500 feet of a freeway, rail line,
arterial, collector or transit corridor sources using health risk assessments to
understand potential impacts.
RC-5.5 Impacts to Air Quality. Ensure new development does not
disproportionately burden residents, due to age, culture, ethnicity, gender,
race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, with health effects from air
pollution. Prioritize resource allocation, investments, and decision making that
improves air quality for residents disproportionately burdened by air pollution
because of historical land use planning decisions and overarching institutional
and structural inequities.
EXHIBIT E
Page 217
xxvxxiv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-6
CLIMATE CHANGE.
A resilient community that reduces its contributions to a changing climate and is
prepared for the health and safety risks of climate change.
RC-5.6 Community Benefit Plan. Require that any land use generating
or accommodating more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with
operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or where TRU unit
operations exceed 300 hours per week, provide a community benefit plan
demonstrating an offset to community impacts of the truck traffic.
RC-5.7 New Sensitive Receptors Near Existing Industrial Uses.
Avoid placing homes, schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities within 1,000
feet of a land use that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than
40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or where
TRU unit operations exceed 300 hours per week.
RC-5.8 New Localized Air Pollution Sources Near Existing Sensitive
Receptors. Avoid placing land uses that accommodate more than 100 trucks
per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs)
per day, or where TRU unit operations exceed 300 hours per week within
1,000 feet of homes, schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities.
RC-5.9 Truck Hook-Ups at New Industrial or Commercial
Developments. Require new industrial or commercial developments at which
heavy-duty diesel trucks idle on-site to install electric truck hook-ups in docks,
bays, and parking areas.
RC-5.10 Clean and Green Industry. Prioritize non-polluting industries and
companies using zero or low air pollution technologies.
RC-5.11 Dust and Odor. Require new construction to include measures to
minimize dust and odor during construction and operation.
RC-6.1Climate Action Plan. Maintain and implement a Climate Action Plan
(CAP) that provides best management practices for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
RC-6.2 Renewable Energy. Encourage renewable energy installations and
facilitate green technology and business.
RC-6.3 Reduce Energy Consumption. Encourage a reduction in
community-wide energy consumption.
RC-6.4 Urban Forest. Protect the city’s healthy trees and plant new ones to
provide shade, carbon sequestration, and purify the air.
RC-6.5 GHG Reduction Goal. Reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990
levels by 2050 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045.
RC-6.6 Co-Benefits. Prioritize the development and implementation of GHG
reduction measures that also achieve economic, health, social, environmental,
and other co-benefits for the City and its residents and businesses.
RC-6.7 Structural Equity. Encourage GHG reduction and climate
adaptation measures such as trail completion, equipment upgrade, sidewalk
connectivity, tree planting, and buffers be included in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) to improve areas of the city where these features
are lacking.
RC-6.8 Reduce Vehicle Trips. Require Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies, such as employer provided transit pass/parking credit,
bicycle parking, bike lockers, high-speed communications infrastructure for
telecommuting, and carpooling incentives, for large office, commercial, and
industrial uses.
RC-6.9 Access. Require pedestrian, vehicle, and transit connectivity of streets,
trails, and sidewalks, as well as between complementary adjacent land uses.
RC-6.10 Green Building. Encourage the construction of buildings that are
certified Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) or equivalent,
emphasizing technologies that reduce GHG emissions.
RC-6.11 Climate-Appropriate Building Types. Encourage alternative
building types that are more sensitive to and designed for passive heating and
cooling within the arid environment found in Rancho Cucamonga.
RC-6.12 Reduced Water Supplies. When reviewing development
proposals, consider the possibility of constrained future water supplies and
require enhanced water conservation measures.
RC-6.13 Designing for Warming Temperatures. When reviewing
development proposals, encourage applicants and designers to consider
warming temperatures in the design of cooling systems.
RC-6.14 Designing for Changing Precipitation Patterns. When
reviewing development proposals, encourage applicants to consider stormwater
control strategies and systems for sensitivity to changes in precipitation regimes
and consider adjusting those strategies to accommodate future precipitation
regimes.
RC-6.15 Heat Island Reductions. Require heat island reduction strategies
in new developments such as light-colored paving, permeable paving, right-
sized parking requirements, vegetative cover and planting, substantial tree
canopy coverage, and south and west side tree planting.
EXHIBIT E
Page 218
xxviixxvi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-7
ENERGY.
An energy efficient community that relies primarily on renewable and non-
polluting energy sources.
RC-6.16 Public Realm Shading. Strive to improve shading in public
spaces, such as bus stops, sidewalks and public parks and plazas, through
the use of trees, shelters, awnings, gazebos, fabric shading and other creative
cooling strategies.
RC-6.17 Offsite GHG Mitigation. Allow the use of creative mitigation
efforts such as offsite mitigation and in lieu fee programs as mechanisms for
reducing project-specific GHG emissions.
RC-6.18 Water Sources with Low GHG Emissions. Encourage local
and regional water utilities to obtain water from sources with low or no GHG
emissions.
RC-7.1 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging on City Property. As funding
is available, encourage the installation of publicly available electric vehicle
charging stations at City-owned buildings, facilities, property, and in the public
right-of-way.
RC-7.2 New EV Charging. Require new multifamily residential, commercial,
office, and industrial development to include charging stations, or include the
wiring for them.
RC-7.3 EV Charging Retrofits. Encourage existing development to retrofit
to include charging stations.
RC-7.4 New Off-Road Equipment. When feasible, require that off-road
equipment such as forklifts and yard tugs necessary for the operations of all
new commercial and industrial developments be electric or fueled using clean
fuel sources.
RC-7.5 Municipal Vehicle Fleet. Reduce fossil fuel consumption of the
City’s vehicle fleet by increasing the number of electric or zero emissions
vehicles.
RC-7.6 Efficiency Retrofits. Encourage existing private property owners to
implement energy efficiency retrofits during substantial improvement as defined
by the California Building Code.
RC-7.7 Sustainable Design. Encourage sustainable building and site
design that meets the standards of Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED), Sustainable Sites, Living Building Challenge, or similar
certification.
RC-7.8 Farmers Market, Fork to Table. Support microscale agriculture
and farmers markets, and similar methods of encouraging locally grown and
consumed produce.
RC-7.9 Passive Solar Design. Require new buildings to incorporate
energy efficient building and site design strategies for the arid environment that
include appropriate solar orientation, thermal mass, use of natural daylight and
ventilation, and shading.
RC-7.10 Alternative Energy. Continue to promote the incorporation of
alternative energy generation (e.g., solar, wind, biomass) in public and private
development.
RC-7.11 Community Development Subdivisions. When reviewing
applications for new subdivisions, require residences be oriented along an east-
west access, minimizing western sun exposure, to maximize energy efficiency.
RC-7.12 Solar Access. Prohibit new development and renovations that
impair adjacent buildings’ solar access, unless it can be demonstrated that
the shading benefits substantially offset the impacts of solar energy generation
potential.
RC-7.13 Energy-Efficient Infrastructure. Whenever possible, use
energy-efficient models and technology when replacing or providing new city
infrastructure such as streetlights, traffic signals, water conveyance pumps, or
other public infrastructure.
RC-7.14 Energy Storage Facilities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
supports the development of energy storage facilities on property owned or
controlled by Southern California Edison and will cooperate with Southern
California Edison on the development of such facilities in a manner that
balances the interests of the community with the need for clean, reliable energy.
RC-7.15 Utility Preservation. Public and private development within the
City, including multi-purpose trails, shall not interfere with safe and reliable
transmission, storage, and generation of electricity. With the exception of utility
infrastructure and other public improvements that do not interfere with such
infrastructure, permanent structures are not allowed within utility corridors.
EXHIBIT E
Page 219
xxixxxviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
S-1
LEADERSHIP.
A city that is recognized for its leadership role in resilience and preparedness.
S-1.1 City Staff Readiness. Ensure City staff and departments demonstrate
a readiness to respond to emergency incidents and events.
S-1.2 Culture of Preparedness. Promote a culture of preparedness for
businesses and residents that empowers them to increase their resilience to
hazard related events and a changing climate.
S-1.3 Evacuation Capacity. Require new developments, redevelopments,
and major remodels to enhance the City’s evacuation network and facilities and
comply with the City’s Evacuation Assessment.
S-1.4 WUIFA Access Points. Require all new developments and
redevelopments within the WUIFA to provide a minimum of two points of access
by means of public roads that can be used for emergency vehicle response and
evacuation purposes.
S-1.5 Enhanced Circulation. In areas of the city with limited access routes
and circulation challenges, require additional roads and improvements to
ensure adequate emergency vehicle response and evacuation.
S-1.6 Evacuation Road Widths. Require any roads used for evacuation
purposes to provide at least 26 feet of unobstructed pavement width.
S-1.7 Maintenance of Plans. Maintain and regularly update the City’s
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) as an integrated component of the
General Plan, in coordination with the Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP), the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), the Evacuation Plan, and
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) compliant disaster plans
to maintain eligibility for grant funding.
S-1.8 Regional Coordination. Ensure regional coordination continues with
neighboring jurisdictions, County, State, and Federal agencies on emergency
management and risk reduction planning and activities.
S-1.9 Mutual Aid. Ensure mutual aid agreements with Federal, State, local
agencies, and the private sector establish responsibility boundaries, joint
response services, and multi-alarm and station coverage capabilities.
SAFETY GOAL
S-2
SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS.
A built environment that minimizes risks from seismic and geologic hazards.
S-2.1 Fault Setbacks. Require minimum setbacks for structures proposed
for human occupancy within State and City Special Study Zones. Setbacks
will be based on minimum standards established under State law and
recommendations of a Certified Engineering Geologist and/or Geo-technical
Engineer.
S-2.2 Building Functionality. Require enhanced siting, design, and
construction standards that focus on building functionality for new critical public
facilities and key essential (private) facilities after a seismic event.
S-2.3 Seismically Vulnerable Buildings. Prioritize the retrofit by private
property owners of seismically vulnerable buildings (including but not limited to
unreinforced masonry, soft-story construction, and non-ductile concrete) as better
information and understanding becomes available.
S-2.4 Transfer of Development Rights. Allow the transfer of development
rights from areas of significant seismic and geologic hazards to select
development areas throughout the City and Sphere of Influence.
S-2.5 Hillside Hazards. Prioritize regulations and strategies that reduce
geologic hazard risk to properties and loss of life.
GOAL
S-3
WILDFIRE HAZARDS.
A community where wildfire impacts are minimized or reduced through
investments in planning and resilience.
S-3.1 Fire Risk Reduction. Apply all state and local codes and regulations
(fire safe design, adherence to Standard 49-1) to new development,
redevelopment, and major remodels in the WUIFA.
S-3.2 Fire Protection Plans. All new development, redevelopment, and
major remodels in the WUIFA will require the preparation of Fire Protection
Plans (FPPs) to reduce fire threat, in accordance with Fire District policies and
procedures.
S-3.3 Vegetation Management. Owners of properties and public/
private roads within and adjacent to the WUIFA are required to conduct brush
clearance and fuel modification to reduce fire ignition potential and spread.
S-3.4 Buffer Zones. Require development projects to incorporate buffer
zones as deemed necessary by the City’s Fire Marshal for fire safety and fuel
modification.
EXHIBIT E
Page 220
xxxixxx | General Plan Annual Report 2023
S-3.5 Water Supply. All developments will meet fire flow requirements
identified in the Fire Code.
S-3.6 Coordination with Agencies. Coordinate with State, regional,
and local agencies and service providers on fire risk reduction planning and
activities.
S-3.7 Wildfire Awareness. Assist residents and property owners with being
better informed on fire hazards and risk reduction activities in the WUIFA.
S-3.8 New Essential Facilities (WUIFA). Prohibit the siting of new
essential public facilities (including, but not limited to, hospitals and health care
facilities, emergency shelters, emergency command centers, and emergency
communications facilities) within the WUIFA, unless appropriate construction
methods or strategies are incorporated to minimize impacts.
GOAL
S-4
FLOOD HAZARDS.
A community where developed areas are not impacted by flooding and
inundation hazards.
S-4.1 New Essential Facilities (Flood). Prohibit the siting and construction
of new essential public facilities within flood hazard zones, when feasible. If an
essential facility must be located within a flood hazard zone, incorporate flood
mitigation to the greatest extent practicable.
S-4.2 Flood Risk in New Development. Require all new development
to minimize flood risk with siting and design measures, such as grading that
prevents adverse drainage impacts to adjacent properties, on-site retention of
runoff, and minimization of structures located in floodplains.
S-4.3 500-Year Floodplain. Promote the compliance of 100-year
floodplain requirements on properties located within the 500-year floodplain
designation.
S-4.4 Flood Infrastructure. Require new development to implement and
enhance the Storm Drain Master Plan by constructing stormwater management
infrastructure downstream of the proposed site.
S-4.5 Property Enhancements. Require development within properties
located adjacent, or near flood zones and areas of frequent flooding to reduce
or minimize run-off and increase retention on-site.
S-4.6 Regional Coordination. Promote regional flood management and
mitigation projects with other agencies (San Bernardino County Flood Control,
Army Corps of Engineers, and adjacent jurisdictions) to address flood hazards
holistically.
S-4.7 Dam Operators. Coordinate with agencies operating or managing
dam facilities that can inundate the city, on operations, maintenance, and
training activities and provide the latest Emergency Action Plans annually.
GOAL
S-5
EMERGING HAZARDS.
A built environment that incorporates new data and understanding about
changing hazard conditions and climate stressors.
S-5.1 Future Conditions. Ensure future climatic conditions and public health
emergencies are considered as part of community resilience and investment
efforts.
S-5.2 Urban Forestry Plan. Minimize damage associated with wind-related
hazards and address climate change and urban heat island effects through the
development of an urban forestry plan and proper landscaping planting and
management techniques.
S-5.3 Soil Transport. Require that properties with high wind-blown soil
erosion potential such as agricultural operations and construction sites prevent
soil transport and dust generation wherever possible.
S-5.4 Extreme Heat Vulnerabilities. Require that new developments,
major remodels, and redevelopments address urban heat island issues and
reduce urban heat island effects for the proposed project site and adjacent
properties.
S-5.5 Resilience Resources. Require new developments and
redevelopments to incorporate resilience amenities such as, but not limited to
community cooling centers, emergency supplies, and backup power that can be
used by residents and businesses within a 1/4-mile radius of the location.
S-5.6 Underground Utilities. Promote the under-grounding of utilities for
new development, major remodels, and redevelopment.
S-5.7 Future Adaptation. Future climate adaptation-oriented projects will
incorporate natural infrastructure to the greatest extent practicable.
S-5.8 Climate Resiliency. Address climate resiliency and inequities through
the planning and development process.
S-5.9 Address High Winds. Require buildings and developments exposed
to high wind conditions to incorporate design elements and features that
minimize or reduce damage to people, structures, and the community.
EXHIBIT E
Page 221
xxxiiixxxii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
S-6.1 Planned Development. Promote development patterns that integrate
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles that reduce
the potential for human-caused hazards.
S-6.2 Neighboring Properties. Encourage properties that store, generate,
or dispose of hazardous materials to locate such operations as far away as
possible from areas of neighboring properties where people congregate.
S-6.3 Site Remediation. Encourage and facilitate the adequate and timely
cleanup of existing and future contaminated sites and the compatibility of future
land uses.
S-6.4 Airport Planning. Protect Rancho Cucamonga interests regarding
land use and safety by participating in the airport land use planning process for
Ontario International Airport.
S-6.5 Height Restrictions. Require proposed developments within the
Ontario Airport Influence Area meet the height requirements associated with
FAR Part 77 standards.
S-6.6 Development Near Airport. New development within the Ontario
Airport Influence Area shall be consistent with the approved Airspace Protection
Zones identified in the latest version of the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
S-6.7 Railroad Safety. Minimize potential safety issues and land use
conflicts when considering development adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.
GOAL
S-6
HUMAN CAUSED HAZARDS.
A community with minimal risk from airport hazards and hazardous materials.
N-1.1 Noise Levels. Require new development to meet the noise
compatibility standards.
N-1.2 Noise Barriers, Buffers and Sound Walls. Require the use of
integrated design-related noise reduction measures for both interior and exterior
areas prior to the use of noise barriers, buffers, or walls to reduce noise levels
generated by or affected by new development.
N-1.3 Non-Architectural Noise Attenuation. Non-architectural noise
attenuation measures such as sound walls, setbacks, barriers, and berms shall
be discouraged in pedestrian priority areas (or other urban areas or areas
where pedestrian access is important).
N-1.4 New Development Near Major Noise Sources. Require
development proposing to add people in areas where they may be exposed
to major noise sources (e.g., roadways, rail lines, aircraft, industrial or other
non-transportation noise sources) to conduct a project level noise analysis and
implement recommended noise reduction measures.
N-1.5 Urban and Suburban Development Near Transit. Allow
development located in infill areas, near transit hubs, or along major roadways
an exemption from exterior noise standards for secondary open space areas
(such as front yards, parking lots, stoops, porches, or balconies), if noise
standards can be met for primary open space.
N-1.6 Rail Crossing Quiet Zones. Allow the establishment of a full or
partial at-grade rail crossing or quiet zone near transit hubs or residential
development.
N-1.7 Entertainment. Establish different standards for exterior noise
consistent with the place type.
N-1.8 Vibration Impact Assessment. Require new development to reduce
vibration to 85 VdB or below within 200 feet of an existing structure.
GOAL
N-1
NOISE.
A city with appropriate noise and vibration levels that support a range of places
from quiet neighborhoods to active, exciting districts.
NOISE
EXHIBIT E
Page 222
4
6
2
3
RESOLUTION NO. 24-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE
MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65103 (c) and 65401 of the State of California Government
Code, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Major Projects Program (MPP) for Fiscal Year
2024/25 as to its consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the project is Categorically Exempt (Section 15306-Class 6) from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the analysis and recommendations of
Engineering Services Department staff, contained in their Staff Report dated May 22, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND that the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, finds the Major
Projects Program for Fiscal Year 2024/25 in conformity with the adopted General Plan.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF MAY 2024.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Matt Marquez, Secretary
I, Matt Marquez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 22nd day of May 2024, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
EXHIBIT D
Page 223
4
6
2
3
Page 224