HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC Resolutions 1988-2005 RESOLUTION NO. 05-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00600, DESIGNATING 6862
ETIWANDA AVENUE AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 6862
ETIWANDAAVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN:
1089-511-07.
A. Recitals.
1. Janette L. Huckins filed an application for a Landmark Designation as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 28, 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission of the. City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts setforth in the Recitals, Part A,of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately.34 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration,
located at 6862 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced
public hearing on September 28, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. Finding: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property is an excellent example of life in early Cucamonga, as
the residents needed to locate themselves towards the Cucamonga
town center to be closer to their businesses.
Facts/s: The dwelling is representative of the typical style of suburban
dwellings in Post WWI America. It employs the Colonial Revival style,
which was heavily used during the building boom of the 1920s and
1930s.
2. Finding: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Fact/s: Neil Hickcox built and occupied the dwelling from 1931 onward and
was the son of one of Cucamonga's early residents. His father was a
Zanjero for the Etiwanda Water Company, and was involved in the
grape and citrus industries.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-04
DRC2005-00600-JANETTE L. HUCKINS
September 28, 2005
Page 2
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. Finding: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact1s: The proposed landmark contributes to the character of the historic
neighborhood as an early twentieth century home and represents the
evolution of small City lot development from large agricultural lots in
early Cucamonga.
2. Finding: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,community,and/orthe City.
Facts: The proposed Landmark is an example of the historic dwellings built
for suburban family use in the early twentieth century, which were
located close to the original Cucamonga town center.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA,
pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (Historical Resource
Restoration/Rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this
Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends
approval on the 28th day of September, 2005, of the Landmark Designation.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2005.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: 4�7z�
Pam St art, Ch ' an
ATTEST:
Can
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,
and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of September 2005, bythe following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
RESOLUTION NO. 05-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00377,
DESIGNATING THE ALDERFER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED
AT 8308 BAKER STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—
APN: 0207-583-19.
A. Recitals,
1. Richard and Sharon Lea filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On September 28, 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1/2 acre, basically a square configuration,
located at 8308 Baker Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on September 28, 2005, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. Finding: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or, way of life.
Facts: The property is an excellent example of the agricultural
period of the Cucamonga area, also exemplifying the
livelihood of many settlers in this region.
2. Finding: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its
kind.
Facts: The original Bungalow was built in 1911, with a subsequent
addition in 1928.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 05-03
DRC2005-00377 - RICHARD AND SHARON LEA
September 28, 2005
Page 2
3. Finding: The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: A. J. Becker, a peach rancher, built the original structure in
1911. The subsequent structure to be land marked was built
by Hiram Aderfer in 1928, who was a citrus rancher and
dairyman. Hiram Alderfer was an active member of the
community and his church.
4. Finding: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: Citrus ranching represents one of the most popular
agricultural livelihoods in the area. Citrus groves were once
seen throughout the region, but are now a rare sight.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1. Finding: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The wood and stone is preserved and artfully incorporated
into the residence. The roof is a high cross gable with wood
shingles. The eaves are enclosed and the rafters are
exposed.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. Finding: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark is the location of one of the early
citrus groves and is reminiscent of the agricultural days.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical
resource/restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, the Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of September 2005, of Landmark
Designation DRC2005-00377.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 05-03
DRC2005-00377 - RICHARD AND SHARON LEA
September 28, 2005
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2005.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Ayl
Pam St art, Chairma
�ATTEST:
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September 2005, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, McNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 05-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00173,
DESIGNATING THE BUEHLER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED
AT 9650 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF-APN: 0208-131-12,
A. Recitals.
1. Amanda Lopez-Castanon filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On April 13, 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .27 acre of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 13, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
F, acUs: The property is an excellent example of life in early Cucamonga, as
the residents needed to locate themselves towards the Cucamonga
town center to be closer to their businesses.
Facts: The dwelling is part of a grouping of structures built at the turn of the
century on smaller City lots that were different from the previous
development of large agricultural lots.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The dwelling was built pre 1913.
'"01 an .l .'.. !Q7 T Asno aqA . .
1.7 f Of on lit
•r. 1 , L 1;;. wf .. a. ,
,
'.�S;i ! v .1�- ':,{� •itl.rl i.�". .il. .f. -., I.Ip., •fl.y r.� !•-"' ��•�
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-02
DRC2005-00173—AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON
April 13, 2005
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Facts: Walter A. Buehler lived in the dwelling from 1920 until 1944. He
established Buehler Tank Works, a major local industry, and was a
large employer during World War Il.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the character of the historic
neighborhood as part of a group of turn of the century homes and
represents the evolution of small City lot development from large
agricultural lots in early Cucamonga.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City.
Facts: The proposed Landmark is part of a larger group of historic dwellings
located close to the original Cucamonga town center.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt
under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption
(Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Landmark Designation on the 13th day of April, 2005.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
La . McNiel, Vice Chairmari
ATTEST:
Brad Bull r. ,sec etary
1. ... y.. � 1. �). ..... �. � n. r..i .. .. .. .. � ... .. _.
� .. n .. . :. � .1 � is {{ '. l.. � ! � I
'
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-02
DRC2005-00173—AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON
April 13, 2005
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of April 2005, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, .McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
.. i., i ..
RESOLUTION NO. 05-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2005-00160,FOR ALTERATIONS
AT THE HISTORIC STEGMEIER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7050 ETIWANDA
AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 1089-071-24.
A. Recitals.
1. David L. Rosin filed an application for the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit
DRC2005-00160, as described in the title of this Resolution. 'Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application,and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on March 23,2005,including written and oral staff reports,together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property located at 7050 Etiwanda Avenue with a
street frontage of 115 feet and lot depth of approximately 200 feet, and is presently improved with
the historic Stegmeier house and barn.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family
residential,Very Low Density;the property to the south is developed with single-family residential„
Very Low Density;, the property to the east is vacant, zoned residential, Low Density; and the
property to the west is developed with single-family residential, Very Low Density; and
c. The Stegmeier house and barn, on the property of the proposed application,was
designated as an Historic Landmark by the City Council on April 4, 1990; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 05-01
DRC2005-00160 — DAVID L. ROSIN
March 23, 2005
Page 2
b. The proposed use, together with the Landmark Alteration Permit, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
C. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,This
Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2005-00160, subject to each and
every condition set forth below.
Planning Department
1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections
of the Development Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, Uniform
Building Code, or any other City Ordinances.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2O05.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry NI Niel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad BB I r ecr tary
I, Brad Buller,Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
RESOLUTION NO. 04-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2004-00364 FOR ALTERATIONS
TO THE SAM MALOOF RESIDENCE AND WORKSHOP, A HISTORIC
LANDMARK LOCATED AT 8744 HIDDEN FARM ROAD; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1061-281-16.
A. Recitals.
1. The Sam and Alfreda Maloof Foundation for the Arts and Crafts filed an application for a
Landmark Alteration Permit as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Landmark Alteration Permit is referred to as "the application."
2. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 6.6 acres of land,a square configuration, located
at 8744 Hidden Farm Road.
3. The existing structures were designated as a Historic Landmark by the City Council on
May 15, 1996.
4. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on June 23, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
FACTS FOR FINDING:
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of the Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
Fact: The proposed additions to the property will enhance the historic site.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure orfeature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of a historic nature.
Fact The proposed additions will be architecturally compatible to the
existing structures.
5. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration,togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for
the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-07
LAP DRC2004-00364- SAM AND ALFREDA MALOOF FOUNDATION
Page 2
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, 4, and 5 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code,that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2004-00364 on the 23rd day of June 2004, subject to each and
every condition set forth below.
Engineering Division
1) Pursuant to Planning Division's regulations, provide sufficient off-street
parking for new facilities.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a hydrology study tojustify
relocation of the existing storm drain easement or relocate buildings out
of the easement area.
Environmental Mitigation
Air Quality
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records
shall be available at the construction site for City verification.
2) Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and
projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-07
LAP DRC2004-00364 - SAM AND ALFREDA MALOOF FOUNDATION
Page 3
evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be
utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for
the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards
noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied
either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1108.
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and
403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering.
• Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
• Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time.
• Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed
excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
• Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
• Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if
silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a
result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year
of construction.
• Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e.,wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
• Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or
cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water of other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board
[RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMIn emissions, in accordance with
SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 04-07
LAP DRC2004-00364- SAM AND ALFREDA MALOOF FOUNDATION
Page 4
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading
Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use.
10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to
incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning,
appliances, and water heaters.
11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to
incorporate thermal pane windows and weather stripping.
Cultural Resources
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to
monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect
or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from
demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for
the City to establish its archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of
archaeological sites within new developments, using their special
qualities as a theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological
heritage.
• Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of
approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,
important, and unique prehistoric resources,following appropriate
CEQA guidelines.
• Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting
the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources
within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,
with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving.
Geology and Soils
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions,
in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule
established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off site. Timing may vary depending upon time
of year of construction.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-07
LAP DRC2004-00364 - SAM AND ALFREDA MALOOF FOUNDATION
Page 5
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such
episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions.
Hydrology and Wafer Quality
1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated
into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be
used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains,
pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff
spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the
City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce
pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent
practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural
measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and
Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June
2000.
3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall
submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with
obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the
State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been
obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)
shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES
General Construction Permit.
Noise
1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday.
2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at
the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform
weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code
Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the
Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the
Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the
above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the
Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-07
LAP DRC2004-00364- SAM AND ALFREDA MALOOF FOUNDATION
Page 6
construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of
compliance with above noise standards or halted.
3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used
for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the
construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation
plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent
feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive
land uses or residential dwellings.
7. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: IDK
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTES4Le
Oerson,22ct—ing Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day of June 2004,by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 04-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK
DRC2003-01073, DESIGNATING 26 OF THE BERYL WALNUT TREES
A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON BERYL AVENUE, NORTH OF
HILLSIDE ROAD AND SOUTH OF CARRARI COURT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1071-371-26, 27, 28, 29, 31,
33, AND 40.
A. Recitals.
1. Judy Spaulding filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On April 28, and continued to May 12, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said application on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to seven parcels, each approximately 1/2 acre of land, and
basically rectangular configurations, located on Beryl Street, north of Hillside.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 28, and May 12, 2004, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The trees are an excellent example of life in early Alta Loma, as
the residents were dependent on local agriculture for much of their
income.
Walnuts were a lesser known, but still popular, agricultural crop
within the community. These walnut trees represent a way of life
for some of the early residents of the area.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-06
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-01073- JUDY SPAULDING
May 12, 2004
Page 2
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of agricultural use
that was once common but is now rare.
Fact1s: Commercially growing walnuts was used to supplement a family's
income earlier in the 20th Century, but is now a rare occurrence.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The trees are a minimum of 60 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
FacUs: Both the Toews and Carrad families were well known and
respected within the community of Alta Loma.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark contributes to the beauty of the Alta Loma
community and has been a feature of the landscape for over 50
years.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is
exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31
exemption (historical resource restorationtrehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of May 2004, of Landmark
Designation.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: 1
Larry c ie , Vice Chairm n
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-06
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-01073- JUDY SPAULDING
May 12, 2004
Page 3
AT7TEST:
Brad B r, S ret
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 12th day
of May 2004, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
RESOLUTION NO. 04-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-01046, FOR ALTERATIONS
AT THE HISTORIC COUR HOUSE LOCATED AT 7576 ETIWANDA
AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
1100-031-06.
A. Recitals.
1. Ethan Ruch filed an application forthe approval of Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-
01046, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 28th day of April 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 28, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property located at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue,which is
presently improved with the historic Cour house with a street frontage of 95 feet and lot depth of
189.39 feet. The Landmark Designation excludes the more recently built garage.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is the historic Koch house, the property
to the south is vacant land and further to the south is the Post Office; the property to the east is
developed with the Interstate 15 Freeway, and the property to the west is Etiwanda Avenue and
beyond is Etiwanda Gardens banquet facility; and
c. The Cour house, on the property of the proposed application,was designated as a
Historic Landmark by the City Council on February 21, 1996, by adoption of City Council Resolution
No. 96-013; and
d. The application proposes using the Cour house as a real estate office.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05
DRC2003—01046 - RUCH
April 28, 2004
Page 2
a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
b. The proposed use, together with the Landmark Alteration Permit, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
C. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with
each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.
d. Based upon the changes and alterations that have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046, subject to each and
every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this
reference.
Planning Division
1) The project must be completed as per Site Plans and Elevations dated
April 28, 2004.
2) Temporary curbing to be installed at edge of drive and parking area.
3) Exterior, exposed side of handicap accessible ramp to be constructed
of river rock.
4) Monument Sign is approved only for materials, massing, and location.
The sign and text is subject to a Sign Permit Application.
5) Remove north drive approach.
Engineering
1) There is a possibility that an application to vacate Candlewood Street
may be made by the applicant for SUBTT16454/DRC2003-001b1. If
Candlewood Street is not going to be constructed, driveway access will
be limited to Etiwanda Avenue and shall meet Commercial standards,
including a 35-foot minimum width and 300-foot spacing with respect to
adjacent driveways and 100-foot distance from the intersection. Master
planning access to, and shared access with, the adjacent site to the
south will need to be proposed as an alternative should Cottonwood
Street not be constructed.
2) Install public improvements on Etiwanda Avenue frontage per City
"Major" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Figure 5-23);
including pavement, cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach,
streetlights, and street trees, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
a) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05
DRC2003— 01046 - RUCH
April 28, 2004
Page 3
b) Provide shared access driveway approach in accordance with the
City Driveway Policy, minimum 300-foot separation between
driveway centerlines, including those on adjacent Not-a-Part
properties, and 100-foot minimum from the Candlewood Street
intersection (measured from BCR to near the edge of the
driveway). Install Commercial Drive Approach with a minimum
width of 35 feet in accordance with City Standard Plan No. 101,
Type-C.
c) Provide signage and striping and protect existing R26 "No
Parking" signs or replace.
d) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Etiwanda Avenue.
e) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Etiwanda Avenue to achieve a
total of 50 feet measured from the centerline of the street.
3) Construction of the Candlewood Street frontage will be deferred until
the north adjacent property is developed. An in-lieu fee as contribution
to the future construction of Cottonwood Street shall be paid to the City
prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be based on the
estimated cost of constructing the south half of the street, to City
"Local"standards, across the northerly frontage of the project site. The
estimated construction cost shall include sidewalk, residential drive
approach, street trees, streetlights, signage and striping, PCC curb and
gutter, and pavement section for the south one-half street width.
4) An interim Commercial Drive Approach (Standard Plan 101, Type-C)
will be allowed on Etiwanda Avenue as long as it is labeled "to be
removed upon construction of Cottonwood Street." Alternately, if a
shared drive approach is located at least 100 feet south of the future
Candlewood Street BCR and an access easement is provided,ultimate
drive approach may not require removal.
5) The master plan storm drain in Etiwanda Avenue is being installed by
the developer of SUBTT16454/DRC2003-00101. Etiwanda/San
Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan
Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
6) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the
Master Plan Storm Drains. Extend the local storm drain system as far
as Etiwanda Avenue as needed to contain Q25 within tops of curbs and
Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10• The cost
of local storm drains shall be bome by this development with no fee
credit. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development
within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said
reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements
being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement
shall terminate.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05
DRC2003—01046 - RUCH
April 28, 2004
Page 4
7) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the
existing overhead utilities(telecommunications and electrical,except for
66kV electrical) on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to
the City prior to issuance of permits. The fee shall be the City adopted
unit amount times the length of the entire project frontage.
Building and Safety Division
8) Before the building can be approved for its new use, a complete set of
plans for the change of occupancy, stamped and signed by an
architect, must be submitted to the Building Division forfire and building
review. Technical issues will be reviewed at that time.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: i4�< Z��
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST: .p
,,,grad Bull ecreta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of April 2004, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McNIEL
V
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#: DRC2003-01046
SUBJECT: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT FOR THE COUR HOUSE
APPLICANT: EHTAN RUCH
LOCATION: 7567 ETIWANDA AVENUE
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION,(909)477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Data
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole
discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-05, Standard
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner,
SC-1-04 1
Project No.DRC2003-01046 '
Completion Date
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _J__J_
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan,including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department(477-2800)prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location,height,and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls,berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single-
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
10. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and
maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. DRC2003-01046. Any
further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior
alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees,
demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall
require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation
Commission review and approval.
11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's
perimeter.
12. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured /
products.
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
SC-1-04
2
Project No.DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction,the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho _J_J_
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development,private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _J_J_
parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the
rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet.
F. Trip Reduction
1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces,whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided,additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage
spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a
3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100.
Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher
whole number.
2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for
commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _J_J_
non-residential development.
G. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110,and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
SC-1-04
3
Project No. DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
4. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
5. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
H. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Anysigns proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(909)477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
J. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following:
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
C. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets,detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number(i.e., SUBTT#,SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on
the outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to
the City prior to permit issuance.
SC-1-04
4
Project No.DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
4. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate Of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number(i.e.,DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in
effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of
the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or
major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation
Development Fee,Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program
deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to
the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance.
3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
L. Existing Structures
1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Due to the scope of the project, an Occupancy Change review is required. Submit plans to the
Building and Safety Division to determine compliance for the proposed use.
3. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required.
4. The project shall be designed to comply with CBC Section 504 regarding mixed occupancy ratio.
5. Provide required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29.
6. All exiting must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated
corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.)
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
M. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _J_J_
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline):
50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue.
30 total feet on Candlewcod Street
3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
SC-1-04
5
Project No.DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
N. Street Improvements
1. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No.88-557,no person shall make connections from a source _/-__J
of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes
and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and
ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been
completed and accepted bythe City Council,except:that in developments containing more than
one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of
those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by
conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or
units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by
these conditions of approval of development.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trall Island Trall Other
Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X X
Candlewood Street (d) (d) (d) (d) I (d) I (d)
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
C. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
SC-1-04
6
Project No.DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. _J_—/_
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program, and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-23, as
directed by the City Engineer.
5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street
improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction
legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet—(typically
sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be
per the public landscape improvement plans.
The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer.
Min.
Grow
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size city.
Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red Gum 8 ft. 30 ft. o.c. 5-gal.
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfiil soil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division.
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with —J—J_
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
O. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
P. Drainage and Flood Control
1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
Q. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
SC-1-04
7
Project'No.DRC2003-01046
Completion Date
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_
Cucamonga County Water District(CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved.
Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. An easement for ajoint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of
building permits, whichever occurs first, for: Etiwanda Avenue.
2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all
new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING
SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Before the building can be approved for its new use, a complete set of plans for the
change of occupancy must be submitted to the Building Division for fire and building
review. Technical issues will be reviewed at that time.
SC-1-04
8
RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST
DRC2004-001.05, DESIGNATING SIX HOUSES BUILT BY THE
KLUSMANS, AS A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT
9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482,AND 9494 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD;AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0208-141-06, 08,
09, 11, 13, AND 14.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Historic Point of Interest as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Point of Interest is
referred to as "the application."
2. On April 14, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.85 acre of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474„9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and',pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a
historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The properties were the location of housing for several families of
fieldworkers, who were important to Cucamonga's agricultural era.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area, primarilyfortheir
aptitude in construction.
,. r � . .
,.
. _ ,, ,
. .. „ . . ,,
. ,� .
-, , . ,. �,
• � . , .
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105
April 14, 2004
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The properties were used by several families involved with local
agriculture, which is no longer a common occurrence in the
Cucamonga area.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Historic Point of Interest Designation is
exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption
(historical resource restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest' designation is merely recognition for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designations. The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 on the 14th day of April, 2004,
subject to the following conditions:
1) The house (structure) at 9494 Foothill Boulevard shall be offered to the
public for relocation or salvage for a period of 30 days prior to demolition.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City
Planner plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to
preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified structures.
Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed prior to
the first occupancy of any Motor Court town home.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST: !J
Brad � r ecr ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of April 2004, by the following
vote-to-wit:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105
April 14, 2004
Page 3
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL
RESOLUTION NO. 04-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME, AND PLACE OF REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga relocated the Historic Preservation Commission
meetings during seismic retrofitting of the Council Chamber at City Hall.
2. The seismic retrofit of the Council Chambers at City Hall is now complete.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Commencing with the February 25, 2004, meeting, regular meetings of the Rancho
Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission shall be held at the Rancho Cucamonga City
Hall Council Chamber, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on
the second and fourth Wednesday of each month. Each such regular meeting shall commence
at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r"
BY:
La V.
McNiel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad B r cret
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 11th day
of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
RESOLUTION NO. 04-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2003-01048,
DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERYA HISTORIC POINT
OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0209-131-02.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Historic Point of Interest as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is
referred to as "the application."
2. On January 28, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the, application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 9.65 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 8812 Haven Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 28, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
FacUs: The winery represents the agricultural period of the Cucamonga
region, and relates to the livelihood of many residents.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
FacUs: The winery was owned at one time by Garrett and Company, one of
Cucamonga's prominent wineries. The cooperative involved several
significant families within the Cucamonga region, including the
Thomases, DeBerards, Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02
DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact1s: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were
not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region
began to be subdivided by developers.
FacUs: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently
owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this
accomplishment.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration,togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for
the application,the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a
whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that
the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Historic Preservation Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts
the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia
Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of'Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-01048
contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02
DRC2003-01048-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 3
Environmental Mitigation
Cultural Resources
1) The property owner will place a plaque at the project site describing the
historical importance of the Pioneer Winery.
2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that
were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer
Winery. A maximum of$2,500 per interview will be deposited with the
City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit.
3) The developer building any new development on this property will
include an interpretive art and architectural component. This
component shall be processed as part of the Development Review
Application.
4) Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property ownerwill complete
Historical Architectural Building Survey(HABS) Level III documentation
or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing
buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An
experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to
produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall
views and details of important exterior and interior features of each
structure. The photographs record textures, details, and spatial
relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. -An
archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white
large-format photographic prints would be completed. The original
documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited
with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
5) A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction
activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis.
The developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological
monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and
for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground
disturbing activity is required. The archaeological monitor will conduct
on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as
outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are
uncovered; construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted
and the emergency discovery procedures described below, will be
implemented. The archaeological monitor will have the authority to
stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated
discovery.
6) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities(including
initial grading of vegetation removal), all 'construction personnel
(including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource
values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those
resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02
DRC2003-01048 —CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 4
procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources
(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and
asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological
monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the
course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer
supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their
commencement of earth moving construction activities. The developer
will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new
construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project.
7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped
immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures
set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the
find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation
measures will be developed in concert with the City.
8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth
moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be
suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be
notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the
treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California
Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety
Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the
treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide forthe
Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and
Associated Grave Goods,"published by the California Native American
Heritage Commission.
9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction
activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as
deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The developer will
be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current
construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the
archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is
required. The paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural
resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If
previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are
uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted
and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be
implemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to
stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated
discovery.
10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including
initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel
(including management) shall be informed of the paleontological
resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources_
The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures
relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources(as
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02
DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 5
outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and
asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological
monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered
during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall
administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel,
prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities.
The developer will be responsible for notifying the paleontological
monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the
project.
11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the
immediate vicinity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist
shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource. During the
evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long
as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact
other resources.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: 1,2�1 `
Ric cias, Ch "rman
ATTEST: / L
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at
a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of January 2004,by
the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McNIEL
e
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01.048
This Mitigation Monitoring Program.(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components-This MMP contains the following elements:
1,. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action
and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary.This
procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported. '
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews,the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued.The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring.The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require
the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These
funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor
and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to
know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: DRC2003-01048 Applicant: Paul B. Hofer III
Initial Study Prepared by: Lori Shriver Date: December 2. 2003
ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. • of Method .
ImplementingDate finitials Non-Compliance
Cultural Resources - 'a-
The property owner will place a plaque at the project site CP D Review of A 3
describing the historical importance of the Pioneer concept material
Winery.
for plaque
The property owner will conduct two oral histories for CP B Review of report D 417
individuals that were connected with the operation or
history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum
of $2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City
Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition
permit.
The developer building any new development on this CP B/C Review of D/C 4!7
property will include an interpretive art and architectural concept plans
component. This component shall be processed as part
of the Development Review Application.
Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property CP B Review of plans D 477
owner will complete Historical Architectural Building
Survey(NABS)Level III documentation or a similar level
of documentation for each of the six contributing
buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District.
An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-
format cameras to produce perspective corrected,
black-and-white photographs of overall views and details
of important exterior and interior features of each
structure. The photographs record textures,details,and
spatial relationships riot easily conveyed by drawings or
written word. An archival-quality deliverable including
written reports, black and white large-format
photographic prints, and measured drawings,would be
completed. The original documents and one single
sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the
Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
1 of 4
ResponsibleMitigation Measure's Noi
g of Method .
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance
A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving CP/BO B Prior to on-site D 4/7
construction activity. The monitoring will be on an activities
intermittent, spot-check basis. The developer will be
responsible for providing the archaeological monitorwith
the current construction schedule on a regular basis,
and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any
unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The
archaeological monitor will conduct on-site cultural
resources sensitivity training (crew education) as
outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface
cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in
the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency
discovery procedures described below will be
implemented. The archaeological monitor will have the
authorityto stop and/or redirect construction in the event
of an unanticipated discovery.
Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction CP/BO B Prior to D 4/7
activities(including initial grading of vegetation removal), construction
all construction personnel (including management)shall activities
be informed of the cultural resource values involved and
of the regulatory protections afforded those resources.
The construction personnel shall also be informed of
procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated
cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be
cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a
construction supervisor and the on-site archaeological
monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered
during the course of construction. The archaeological
monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all
new construction personnel, prior to their
commencement of earth moving construction activites.
The developer will be responsible for notifying the
archaeological monitor when new construction
personnel are scheduled to work on the project.
2 of 4
Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
In the event archaeological resources are unearthed CP/BO C Throughout D 4/7
during excavation activities associated with the Project, construction
work shall be stopped immediately and a qualified activities
archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at
CEQA Section 15064.5,shall evaluate the discovery. If
the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA,further
mitigation measures will be developed in concert with
the City.
If human skeletal remains are found at the project site CP/BO C Throughout D 4/7
during earth moving activities such as grading or construction
trenching, work shall be suspended and the San activities
Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified.
Standard guidelines set by California law provides for
the treatment of skeletal material of Native American
origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections
5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section
7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the
treatment of human remains are found in, "A
Professional Guide for the Preservation and Protection
of Native American Human Remains and Associated
Grave Goods," published by the California Native
American Heritage Commission.
A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving CP/BO B Prior to D 4/7
construction activity. The monitoring will be on an construction
intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate activities
by a qualified paleontologist. The developer will be
responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with
the current construction schedule on a regular basis,
and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any
unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The
paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural
resources sensitivity training (crew education) as
outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface
paleontological materials are uncovered, construction
work in the Immediate vicinity will be halted and the
emergency discovery procedures described below will
be implemented. The paleontological monitor will have
the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the
event of an unanticipated discovery.
3 of 4
Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction CP/BO B Prior to B 4/7
activities(including initial grading of vegetation removal), construction
all construction personnel (including management)shall activities
be informed of the paleontological resources and of the
regulatory protections afforded those resources. The
construction personnel shall also be informed of
procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated
paleontological resources (as outlined below). They
shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to
inform a construction supervisor and the onsite
paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or
mineralized bones are discovered during the course of
construction. The paleontological monitor shall
administer supplemental briefings to all new
construction personnel,prior to their commencement of
earth moving construction activities. The developer will
be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor
when new construction personnel are scheduled to work
on the project.
In.the event paleontological resources are unearthed CP/BO C Throughout D 3
during excavation activities associated with the Project, construction
work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the activities
finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist shall
evaluate the potential significance of the resource.
During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to
nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has
determined that there is no potential to impact other
resources.
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
ODDCommie-Person;ti. N ,,' Monitoring Frei3Ueocy Method of verification^" - Sanctions " =m a
- P � ..
Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map}
CP City Planner or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order
PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP
7-Citation
4 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 04.01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-0711 TO'RELOCATE THE
MINOR HOUSE TO LOT 6 OF TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16554,
CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 1.0089 BASE LINE-APN: 1077-041-57.
A. Recitals.
1. Pinewave Design and Engineering filed an application fora Landmark Alteration Permit
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
2. On January 14, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of'the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as;follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to a structure on approximately 10 acres of land located at 10089
Base Line Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 14,2004, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Landmark Alteration:
The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria established in
Chapter 2.24,120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of the Historic
Preservation Ordinance 2.24.120.
Facts: The proposal meets requirements of the Historic Preservation
Ordinance because the materials are similar to the original and the
design echoes and is in harmony with the other elevations. It does
not harm important features of the original building, and it enhances
the livability and value of the building as a residence.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure orfeature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of an historic,nature.
. . . . � +
� . , ;�
`, �.
,, ,.
., �
„ , . �
, ,
; �
_ � .
� . � , ,
, r,
;� ��, ,
� i�
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 04-01
DRC2003-00711 — PINEWAVE
January 14, 2004
Page 2
FacUs: The alterations will not be detrimental to the historic home and will
increase the likelihood that the house will be preserved for future
generations to enjoy.
4. This Landmark Alteration Permibis not exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act, and is being reviewed for environmental impacts separate from this request in conjunction with
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration DRC20023-0071'1 pursuant to Chapter2.24
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code subject to conditions listed as follows:
1) Pillars supporting the Porte Cochere will either be relocated as is,orwill
be constructed to their current dimensions and appearance.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH.DAY OF JANUARY 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: /f
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad r ecru a
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
. ,'�,�, v r 1 r•
r . r; r_,
,. I .. •,,,,,.
�...?r .r r�. r, fr. its(1r rl..'. it ,... , , ., ..r. � '. le,'.: rr.i '. � ..
_
rr � :1 t •. . il. !�r r r • 1 t r
_ _. _ �. Ir I... i. ..i.
' 111'i. .. lel. � /rl ri �� 1( �.r. I l �r .0 � r r �I .a • u " � r 1..
.. .. r a � ..1:' ..�
' ,r
+v'r, .. r
i
RESOLUTION NO. 03-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2003-00818,
DESIGNATING THE BLESSENT HOUSE A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST,
LOCATED AT 9317 6TH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF -APN: 0210-062-05.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Historic Point of Interest as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is
-referred to as "the application."
2. On October 8, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A,"of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 9.54 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 9317 6th Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 8, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Sianificance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The property was the site for one of the early Italian wine producing
families of the Cucamonga area.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
Factls: The Blessent family was a well-known wine making family of the
Cucamonga area. Also, Antonio Blessent's son was active within the
community, especially in the formation of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga through the Tri-Community Incorporation Committee, and
as manager of the Cucamonga branch of the Bank of America.
. . � . . �,. .i .. ;, :.
,'
_ „�, :_ - '
. .
: . .. ,.
. , ,. , . .
� . .. -
y+ � 'f.
. . c1"
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-12
POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2003-00818
October 8, 2003
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected,with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The property was used by one of several immigrant Italian families that
supported themselves from viticulture.
Finding 4: The site is the location of an important or historic,family.
Fact/s: The Blessent family has resided on this property since 1925-, remaining
active within the Cucamonga community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Historic Point of Interest Designation is
exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State°CEQA Guidelines.Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption
(historical resource restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merelyrecognition for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 8th day of October,2003, of Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-00818.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: 12-
�( 4:�:�
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST: n '
Brad a ecret
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 8th day of October 2003, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
• f3 .� . . , i ,. _ .� , ..
t .
� i
.. ... i..l:'L� ,... � ..
�. • I .. �.. � ! � r 1' a i _ Lt
V-,
RESOLUTION NO. 03-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF DRC2003-00628, DESIGNATING THE ETIWANDA
TELEPHONE SWITCHING STATION AND WATER TANK A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 13103 VICTORIA STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-121-31.
A. Recitals.
1. James Banks, Jr. and Marsha Meeks Banks filed an application for a Landmark as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
2. On August 13, and September 24, 2003„the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.57 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located 13103 Victoria Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 13,,and continued to September 24, 2003, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and
facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical
period, type, style, region or way of life.
Fact/s: The telephone station is an excellent example of the technological
advances made in the early part of the 20th Century.
Fact/s: The water tank exemplifies the agricultural roots of Etiwanda's
history.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building thatwas
once common but is now rare.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-11
DRC2003-00628 BANKS
September 24, 2003
Page 2
Facts: Automatic dialing stations were once a major technological
advance, but now are obsolete in this form and few remain.
Facts: Few poured-in-place concrete water tanks remain in this region.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The Etiwanda telephone switching station is approximately 73 years
old with no major alterations.
Facts: The water tank is 56 years old with a few alterations.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed,landmark are unusual, significant or uniquely effective.
Fact/s: The brick masonry of the building has a unique effect.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark is the first automatic dialing system for the
Etiwanda area and is easily seen from Victoria Street, causing it to
be a noticeable part of the historic area.
Fact/s: The poured-in-place concrete of the water tank is unusual and
uncommon.
Facts: The water tank has remained on the property for over 50 years and
is also visible from Victoria Street, adding to the historical character
of the property.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical resource/restoration/
rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions setforth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic'Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 24th day of September 2003, of Landmark Designation
DRC2003-00628..
� „ , . ., .
. �
. .
-, ��_
. . . . .;,
.. .. _ � i �
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-11
DRC2003-00628- BANKS
September 24,;2003
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
. Z,- C�z
rry T. cN el, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
rad Bu creta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of September
2003, by the following vote-to-wit: '
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, STEWART
. ; a:
� .
; , .
,:
, .
, . , — , ..
, . ,. . .
, ,
RESOLUTION NO. 03-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING_ APPROVAL OF DRC2003-00630, DESIGNATING
THE HIPPARD RANCH VINEYARDS A HISTORIC LANDMARK,
LOCATED AT 13100 VICTORIA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227-121- 53 AND 54.
A. Recitals.
1. James Banks, Jr. and Marsha Meeks Banks filed an application for a Landmark as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
2. On August 13, and September 24, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 9 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration,.located at 13100 Victoria Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 13, and continued to September 24, 2003, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and
facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed ,landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region or way of life.
Facts: The property is an excellent example of the agricultural period of
the Etiwanda area, also exemplifying the livelihood of many
settlers in this region.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The original vineyards were planted prior to 1916.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
i . .� . .�
e ti
.'
. . ;� . .,
. , ._ � '' . '�.'. _ ,. . . , .I
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-10
DRC2003-00630 - BANKS
September 24, 2003
Page 2
Facts: Both the Chaffey and Hippard families were well known in the
region. The Chaffey family owned the property less than a year,
but the vineyards remained in the Hippard family for over 50
years. The Chaffey family was involved with the creation of the
Etiwanda Colony while Mrs. Hippard was active within the
community through her work as an Etiwanda librarian from 1941-
1948.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The vineyards represent one of the most popular agricultural
livelihoods in the area. Vineyards were once seen throughout the
region, but are now a rare sight.
b. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark is the location of one of the earliest
vineyards in the area and the new vineyards are reminiscent of
the agricultural days of the Etiwanda Model Colony established by
the.Chaffey Brothers.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical resource/restoration/
rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,. 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of August 2003, of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00630.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION,COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
c
BY:
Larry T. iel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Bra Secre
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-10
DRC2003-00630- BANKS
September24, 2003
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation .Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day
of September 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, STEWART
RESOLUTION NO. 03-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-00575, FOR THE
RELOCATION OF THE TOEWS RESIDENCE NORTH OF ITS CURRENT
LOCATION TO LOT 19 ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPOSED
TRACT 16430,TO INCLUDE THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING BARN,
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BARN/GARAGE, AND MINOR
ALTERATIONS, LOCATED AT 5550 ARCHIBALD AVENUE -
APN: 1061-571'-09.
A. Recitals.
1. Manning Homes filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit is
referred to as 'the application."
2. On August 13, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City, of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the building located at 5550 Archibald Avenue, Assessor's
Parcel Number 1061-571-09.
'3. . Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 13,2003, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith
public testimony,and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following,findings and facts:
a. Landmark Alteration:
The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria established' in
Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
Findina 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance.
Fact1s: The landmark alteration, as presented,will enhance and promote the
continued use of the Toews residence.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature
of significant aesthetic,cultural,architectural,or engineering interest
or value of a historic nature.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-09
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-00575— MANNING HOMES
August 13, 2003
Page 2
Fact1s: The proposed relocation, restoration, and rehabilitation are
architecturally compatible and will enhance the continued use of the
Toews residence. The rehabilitation will follow the Secretary of the
Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Categorically Exempt under
CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15301(a).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of August 2003, of Landmark Alteration Permit
DRC2003-00575, subject to conditions listed as follows:
Planning Division:
1) Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00574.
2) Demolish existing barn.
3) Relocate house to final location on Lot 19 of Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT16430 as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
place on raised foundation.
4) Build new garage(two-car minimum)on Lot 19 of Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT16430 as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to
mimic architectural style of original barn.
5) Install hardscape, landscaping,walls,and fences at Lot 19 of Tentative
Tract Map SUBTT16430 as approved by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, as shown in the attached Exhibit"A."
6) Complete exterior improvements to house; install new roof, repaint
exterior, repair wood siding fascia and trim as needed, and make all
windows operable.
7) Complete interior improvements as necessary to make house
habitable. These improvements may include, but not necessarily be
limited to, making all electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems
operable.
8) Provide Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American
Engineering Record (HABS/HAER)documentation prior to demolition.
9) A Type II bronze historic plaque shall be mounted on a bronze colored,
cast aluminum mailbox using the City standard design to the
satisfaction of the City Planner. The text of the plaque shall read:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-09
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-00575— MANNING HOMES
August 13, 2003
Page 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC LANDMARK
C. 1890s
TOEWSHOME
Installed By: Manning Homes
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COM ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: z —
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad ull ecretai
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of August 2003, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 03-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION
DRC2003-00574, DESIGNATING THE TOEWS RESIDENCE A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 5550 ARCHIBALD AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1061-571-09.
A. Recitals.
1. Manning Homes filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On August 13, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to a structure on approximately 4.3 acres of land, located at
5550 Archibald Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 13, 2003, including written and oral staff reports; together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code„this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
FacUs: The residence is an excellent example of the residences built
during the early settlement years of the Alta Loma community and
the once flourishing citrus and grape growing industries.
Finding 2: The ,proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that
was once common but is now rare.
FacUs: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-08
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-00574— MANNING HOMES
August 13, 2003
Page 2
Fact1s: The intact home was built in the late 1890s and is approximately
108 to 112 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important, or a local personality.
Fact/s: The home was originally built by William Whitfield for his daughter
Lee and her husband Fredrick Haag. The Haags sold the home
and surrounding property to Abraham and Anna Toews. All three
families were instrumental in the citrus and grape industries, and
in the settlement Alta Loma (formally loamosa).
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once a common business and use for land in the
Rancho Cucamonga area.
Fact/s: The home is reminiscent of the citrus and grape industries, and
ranching that was once a common business and use for land in
the Rancho Cucamonga area.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Facts: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the
use of details and craftsmanship that was once common, but now
rare. The Toews residence is a two-story "saltbox" shaped
structure of Classical Revival design, as well as masonry
construction that was popular circa 1905. The home is made
primarily of painted wood siding with a raised river rock footing.
The home has a number of square and rectangular shaped
windows with wood mullions and surrounds. The home is painted
entirely white in color.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
particularly beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful or
unusual.
Fact/s: The "saltbox" shape, amount of wood siding, and large bay
window on the front of the home add to the beauty and
uniqueness of the proposed landmark. The features are not
commonly found in residential construction today.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-08
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-00574 — MANNING HOMES
August 13, 2003
Page 3
Facts: The Toews residence is one of the oldest surviving residences
built in Alta Loma. The home enhances the historic character of
the community, which includes the historic Demens-Tolstoy house
directly to the north and the Grandma Isaak house directly to the
west.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption
(historical resource/restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of August 2003, of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00574.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad B er cret
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day
of August 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MCNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 03-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DRC2003-00648, DESIGNATING
THE GOERLITZ HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT
9893 HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF -APN: 1076-051-02 AND 03.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as
"the application."
2. On July 23, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby, found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application and designation applies to approximately 1.02 ,acres of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located 9893 Highland Avenue, and includes the following
elements: the Goerlitz residence, garage, mature landscaping, and stone retaining walls.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 23, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period,
type, style, region or way of life.
Fact/s: The residence is an excellent example of stone construction using local river
rock materials. The property also represents the citrus industry of Alta Loma.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that was once
common but is now rare.
Fact/s: Stone construction was once popular in the.Alta Loma area, but it becoming
rare. Also, the Craftsman/California rancho architecture is unique.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-05
DRC2003-00648—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 23, 2003
Page 2
Facts: The residence is 77 years,old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important
or a local personality.
Facts: The Goerlitz family was instrumental in the evolution of the town of Alta Loma
through Ernest's active participation in bringing the Pacific Electric railroad to
the area. The family was also active in the local social circles.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed
landmark are unusual, significant or uniquely effective.
Facts: The river.rock and Craftsman/California Rancho style is unique to Alta Loma.
The conversion of a citrus reservoir to a swimming pool in the 1950's is
unique and retains some of the historic integrity of the home.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is particularly
beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The house has retained its beauty, and the architecture of the home remains
unusual and unique.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark has long existed on Highland Avenue and is a well-
known local fixture.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,at landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical
resource/restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of July 2003 of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00648, subject to the following conditions:
1) All interior and exterior walls, roof, windows, and doors shall be
repaired or replaced in kind to original standards and remain in
good condition. All exterior modifications shall be made to
resemble, as much as possible, building materials and architecture
as originally used.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-05
DRC2003-00648—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 23, 2003
Page 3
2), Landscape shall be kept healthy through regular care. Landscape
included in historic designation shall not be removed.
3) City staff shall first review Caltrans' landscape plans prior to
seeking bids for those plans..
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BYi —��
Rich Macias; Vice Cha'
.�
ATTEST Y
. G�
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting.Secretary of the Historic,Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and- adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic,Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day
of July 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MCPHAIL, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
f
RESOLUTION NO. 03-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE 'HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-00103 FOR THE
RELOCATION OF, AND EXTERIOR CHANGES TO, THE BARTHOLOW
HOME, LOCATED AT 12951, BASELINE ROAD-APN: 1100-011-01.
A. Recitals.
1. KB Home filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined, and resolved the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to a structure on approximately 10 acres of land located at
12951 Base Line Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 9, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Landmark Alteration:
The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria established in
Chapter 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this
Ordinance.
Facts: The landmark alteration, as presented, will enhance and promote
continued use of the Bartholow Home.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of a historic nature.
Fact/s: The proposed restoration and rehabilitation is architecturally
compatible and will enhance the continued use of the Bartholow
.. . .,
i
,: ., . �3 . -. ,. ,-..
i �..
.. ' i
�i
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 03-04
LA2003-00103— KB HOME
July 9, 2003
Page 2
Home. The rehabilitation will follow the Secretary of the Interior's
Guidelines for Rehabilitation.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as this landmark alteration is
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration DRC2002-00809 pursuant to
Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code subject to conditions listed as follows:
Planning Division:
1) The house shall be relocated to Lot 62 of Tentative Tract 16454,
and a minimum two-car detached garage shall be constructed on
the same lot.
2) The structure shall be made habitable including, but not limited to,
roofing and structural repairs, and electrical and plumbing, to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
3) All exterior modifications to be made shall resemble, as much as
possible, building materials and architecture as originally used.
4) Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00102.
5) The house shall be plotted with the veranda facing Etiwanda
Avenue consistent with the provisions of the Etiwanda Avenue
Overlay District.
6) Front yard landscaping shall be installed consistent with the
Etiwanda Specific Plan, including a minimum of two citrus trees
(orange ordemon):
7) A Type II bronze historic plaque shall be mounted on a bronze
colored, cast aluminum mailbox using the City standard design to
the satisfaction of the City Planner. The text of the plaque shall
read:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC LANDMARK
C.1908
BARTHOLOW HOME
Installed By:KB Home
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
�' ., _ . .
�l
.. �_ 1' r
. � ) a .lf a ,f' a.. . i.
t. 1 { .. .' i _ J
1' .
-1 r � 1 ..
01. �
.. � � :� J
�, 4� .. .
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 03-04
LA2003-00103— KB HOME
July 9, 2003
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
BY:
-�
LarrvA"Vickiiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad�ytl re ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day
of July 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL
RESOLUTION NO. 03-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION
DRC2003-00102, DESIGNATING THE BARTHOLOW HOME A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 12951 BASE LINE ROAD, AND
MAKING FINDINGS�IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1100-011-01.
A. Recitals.
1. KB Home filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to a structure on approximately 10 acres of land located at
12951 Base Line Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 9, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
FacHs: The property is an excellent example of the residences built during
the early settlement years of the Etiwanda community and the
once flourishing,citrus growing industry.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that
was once common but is now rare.
Facts: Colonial Revival and Craftsman Bungalow were once common
architectural styles, but few homes have remained intact.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
. . �• � � -.
, , �:.
, � . � _ .
�:.,, _ � ,
. -.
.. r , _ . ,.
,,: � .. t'
o;
.HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-03
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-00102—KB HOME
July 9, 2003
Page 2
Facts: The structure is approximately 95 years old and is intact.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important, or a local personality.
Facts: The Bartholow, Frost, Wood, and Riley families were important
figures in the evolution of the town of Alta Loma. F. L. Bartholow,
the original owner, is an especially important local personality due
to his charter membership in the Etiwanda Fruit Company.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Facts: The large open veranda with round wooden pillars is unique
architecture.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
particularly beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful or
unusual.
Facts: The house has retained its beauty, and the architecture of the
front porch remains to this day.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark is one of the oldest surviving residences
built in Etiwanda. The residence contributes to the rural feel of the
community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental.Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption
(historical resource/restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic,Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day, of July 2003, of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00102.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION:COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-03
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-00102—KB HOME
July 9, 2003
Page 3
BY:
L'ar . P Niel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad'B creta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was-duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day
of July 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL
RESOLUTION NO. 03-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME, AND PLACE OF REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will steed to relocate Historic Preservation
Commission meetings during seismic retrofitting of the Council Chamber at City Hall.
2. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE,, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Commencing with the July 23, 2003, meeting (until further notice), regular meetings
of the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission shall be held at Cucamonga
County Water District in the Board Room, located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month. Each such
regular meeting shall commence at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH'DAY OF JULY 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ,
arty M Niel, Chairman
ATTEST: �
Bra �i S Greta
I, Brad Buller„ Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day
of July 2003, bythe following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART
.. � i
.. . .
,. .�
��
i..
_ ,. Fri' ,� ,. �';.
� � r �
_ .. ij-
u
RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DRC2003-00469, DESIGNATING
THE, HOGANCAMP HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT
9475 LA VINE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF -APN: 0202-072-21.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an'application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as
"the application."
2. On June 11, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution:
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.15 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located 9475 La Vine Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 11, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region or way of life.
Facts: The property is an excellent example of the residences
surrounding the original Alta Loma business district.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that,
was once common but is now rare.
Facts Vernacular bungalow was once a common architectural style, but
few homes have remained in such pristine condition.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
.� � � .. i
.� r
- {
.�
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
DRC2003-00469 - PITTENGER
June 11, 2003
Page 2
Fact/s: The structure is approximately 78 years old with no major
alterations.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
Facts: Both the Clayton and Hogancamp families were instrumental in
the evolution of the town of Alta Loma. Ed Hogancamp is an
especially important local personality because of his extensive
role as both Postmaster of Alta Loma and Alta Loma Fire Chief.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant or uniquely effective.
Facts: The offset gable front porch with wooden pillars is of unique
architecture.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
particularly beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful or
unusual.
Fact/s: The house has retained its beauty, and the architecture of the
front porch remains somewhat unusual.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark is one of the first residences built near
the original business district of the town of Alta Loma. The
,residence contributes to the small-town feel of the homes along
La Vine Street, part of historic Alta Loma.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical
resource/restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 11th day of June 2003, of Landmark
Designation DRC2003-00485.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
DRC2003-00469 - PITTENGER
June 11, 2003
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2003.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY:
Rich Macias, Vice C ' man
ATTEST:
Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary
I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 11th day
of June 2003, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 02-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT LA2002-00003 TO ALLOW
CONVERSION OF THE HISTORIC MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE,
LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM RESIDENTIAL
TO OFFICE USE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —
APN: 208-331-07.
A. Recitals.
1. Soheila Azizi filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On November 13, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct
2. The application applies to approximately 1.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 13, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Landmark Alteration:
The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria established in
Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this
Ordinance.
Facts: The landmark alteration, as presented, will enhance and promote
continued use of the Mitchell residence.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of a historic nature.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 02-04
LA2002-00003—AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 2
Facts: The proposed restoration and rehabilitation is architecturally
compatible and will enhance the continued use of the Mitchell
residence. The rehabilitation will follow the Secretary of the
Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as this landmark alteration is
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration DRC2002-00809 pursuant to
Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code subject to conditions listed as follows:
Planning Division
1) Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of Landmark
Designation LD2002-0003.
2) Subject to all Conditions of Approval for Minor Development Review
DRC2002-00806.
3) All exterior modifications to be made to resemble, as much as
possible, building materials and architecture as originally used.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2002. ,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
�Z
BY:
r4""
Rich Macias, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
rad Bull , cretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day
of November 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 02-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION
LD2002-00003 — DESIGNATING THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE
A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —
APN: 208-331-07.
A. Recitals.
1. Soheila Azizi filed an application for a Landmark Designation as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On November 13, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on November 13, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of ,the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1': The:proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The property identifies the historic period of the early 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community
and the region. The residence is an example of a vineyard house,
which was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which
was once common, but is now rare.
. �.:
..
a
. . �
� , ,
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 02-03
LD2002-00003—AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 2
Facts: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the
once.prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark-eligible property is approximately 84 years old and
is an example of Craftsman style of architecture with Italianate
influence.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by E. DeLarsen. The Mitchell family bought
the residence in 1943. The Mitchells have long been established
within the community. Ellsworth's father established Mitchell and
Son Plumbing in 1938, in Upland and the business continues
under Ellsworth's children.
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once common, but is now rare.
Facts: 'The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the
once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual,significant, or uniquely effective.
Fact/s: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the
use of details and craftsmanship that were once common, but now
is rare. The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure
of craftsman styling with Italianate influence. The roof is medium
gable with red tile, exposed eaves, and knee braces in gable end.
The siding is stucco. Second-story windows are single,
rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill. Windows on the lower
level have transoms with leaded glass. The front door is wood
with leaded glass panels. A front arcade with a roof sundeck and
castellation is present, continuing around the west side of the
structure. Multiple French windows open out onto the second-
story deck.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The gable roof, exposed eaves, and gable braces add to the
beauty of the proposed landmark. They are not common features
that are typically found today.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 02-03
LD2002-00003—AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13,,2002
Page 3
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of
craftsman styling with Italianate influence. In general, the
architectural style enhances the historic character of the City.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Landmark Designation is
exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31
exemption (historical resource restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Historical Preservation Commission hereby recommends approval of Landmark
Designation LD2002-00003 pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2002.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
BY: 12Z
Rich Macias, Vice Chairman
ATTEST: "
Brad ElWrer, cretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day
of November 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 02-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2002-00214 DESIGNATING
THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY CORRIDOR AS AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK, EXCLUSIVE OF ANY STRUCTURES WITHIN THE
CORRIDOR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 202-091-47; 202-151-25 AND 26; 207-101-39 AND 40; 207-141-35;
207-571-86; 208-091-65; 208-431-02; 227-121-35; 227-141-64 AND 78;
1076-261-76 AND 78; 1076-301-18 AND 19; 1076-441-60; 1076-591-14
THROUGH 16; 1089-031-02, 05, 22, AND 23; 1089-071-27 AND 28;
1089-291=01; 1089-531-78; 1089-561-54 THROUGH 56; AND 1089-562-51
THROUGH 53.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as"the
application."
2. On April 24, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. ' This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the former Southern Pacific Railroad Baldwin Park Branch line,
approximately 85 acres of land, basically a continuous corridor averaging 80 feet in width, which
bisects the middle of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The corridor contains various structures,
including drainage facilities and bridges, which are not included in this landmark designation.
3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has joined together with the
regional transportation authority, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and
surrounding cities, to develop a 21-mile multi-purpose trail that would link the cities of Claremont,
Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
Master Plan design concept includes historical markers to celebrate our rich heritage. The rail trail
would also connect to the Citrus Regional Bikeway 6.9-mile rail trail project being planned from
Claremont to San Dimas. The Master Plan identifies potential funding sources, including a variety of
grant programs that are available for historic preservation purposes.
4. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan calls for reserving the middle 45 feet
of the corridor,for future rail. The proposed landmark designation,is not intended•to affect SANBAG's
ability to re-establish rail service in the future. On the contrary,the re-establishment of rail service in
the Pacific Electric Railway corridor substantially as proposed in the current Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail Master Plan would be consistent with and in furtherance of the historic preservation
purposes of this landmark designation.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-02
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2002-00214
April 24, 2002
Page 2
5. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 24, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The Pacific Electric Railway identifies a historic period of the early
1900s,when local ranchers banded together to obtain direct freight rail
service to haul their citrus fruit crops.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building,which was
once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The Pacific Electric Railway, with its distinctive red trolley cars and
overhead electric lines, was once the world's largest interurban and
street railway system.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important, and/or a local personality.
Fact/s: The coalition of local ranchers who fought to obtain this Pacific Electric
Railway line was led by Captain Peter Demens, a prominent member
of the loamosa/Alta Loma community. Peter Demens(Piotr Demetieff)
had been a captain in the Russian Imperial Guard at the palace of
Czar Alexander ll. A successful entrepreneur, his varied business
interests included sawmill owner, road promoter, contractor, banker,
citrus grower, President of the Cucamonga Citrus Fruit Grower's
Association, and writer. Captain Demens was one of the most
influential pioneers in the community.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: This Pacific Electric Railway line played an important part in the citrus
industry and was the impetus for the development of downtown areas
for both the Alta Loma and Etiwanda communities. The citrus industry
has vanished and all that is left are a few remnant groves.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
Fact/s: The Pacific Electric Railway corridor adjoins several of the most
important historic landmarks throughout the community, including the
Sycamore Inn, Casa de Cucamonga(listed on National Register), and
the Etiwanda Depot.
r
i'�
.. ,. ;� - �
. .a � .. �'_ .r.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-02
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2002-00214
April 24, 2002
Page 3
Finding 2: 'The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Facts: The Pacific Electric Railway corridor is a very prominent community
feature stretching approximately 7 miles through the heart of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga. The corridor is unique because it offers rare
unobstructed views through the community.
6. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in.
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15331.
7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3,4, and 5 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Landmark Designation DRC2002-00214 on the 24th day of April 2002.
Further, this Commission, as part of its action to approve the Landmark Designation, pursuant to
Section 2.24.1'00 of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, hereby approves the
Landmark Designation with the understanding and on the basis that construction, alteration, or
demolition may occur within the Pacific Electric Railway corridor as specified in, and as proposed by,
the current Pacific Electric Inland Empire,Trail Master Plan, and that such actions shall not require
Landmark Alteration Permit approval from the City pursuant to Section 2.24.160 of Chapter 2.24 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. However, any such construction, alteration, or demolition
may require additional environmental review, as provided by the California Environmental QualityAct
(CEQA) and may be subject to other required permits and approvals required by law
8. . The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Rich Macias, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bulle ecretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of April 2002, by the following
vote-to-wit:
, , , ,
,,
�- �.
. a. ,
� :
.. �. :, , .
,, ..
- .. . .
. . . .. �
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-02
LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2002-00214
April 24, 2002
Page 4
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STEWART
RESOLUTION NO. 02-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION`OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2002-00077 FOR A REQUEST TO DEMOLISH
3,600 SQUARE FEET OF METAL SHEDS FOR THE MAIN WINERY BUILDING
IN THE ELLENA/REGINA WINERY, LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 227-161-24.
A. Recitals.
1. The Redevelopment Agency filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark
Alteration Permit is referred to as "the application."
2. On March 27, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined' and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 14 acres of land, located on the south side of
Base Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on March 27, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 2.24.010
of the Municipal Code.
Facts: The Landmark Alteration will contribute to the long-term economic life of
the facility by allowing the current winery user to continue using the
remaining portions of the complex.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of a historic nature.
Facts: The metal lean-to sheds at the west elevation have been deemed
historically insignificant. The demolition of the metal jean-to sheds will
not be detrimental to the main winery building. Upon removal of the
metal lean-to sheds, the west elevation will be aesthetically enhanced
with the refinishing of the building wall, which will be compatible to the
main winery building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-01
LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2002-00077
ELLENAIREGINA WINERY
Page 2
Finding 3: The action proposed is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous
condition on the property.
Fact/s: The demolition of the metal lean-to sheds is necessary to makethe main
winery building safe for a future wine museum and wine tour.
Finding 4: The applicant has demonstrated that denial of the application will result in
immediate or substantial hardship.
Facts: The denial of the application will result in hardship for the current winery
user toward implementing their ultimate plan to establish a museum and
wine tour of the facility.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of1970 as Categorically Exempt under
CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15301(a).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code,that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2002-00077.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2O02.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
n BY• ` 4 S r
La OcNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
red Bull ecret
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 27th.day of March 2002, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 01-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK
DRC2001-00688 TO DESIGNATE THE DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE AS
A LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —
APN: 207-081-24.
A. Recitals.
1. Daniel and Gina Shackelford filed an application for Landmark Designation described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to
as "the application."
2. On December 12, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, it is here by found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to all structures, heritage eligible trees, and the
approximately .52 acre of land, a rectangle configuration located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: Large estate residences, such as the Dorothy Finley home are
representative of the original development of the Red Hill area.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which
was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The property identifies a historic period of the 1920s, '30s, and
'40s, when homes of Spanish prototypes became popular in
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-05
DRC2001-00688 DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE
December 12, 2001
Page 2
California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida following the Panama-
California Exposition held in San Diego in 1915.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts; The landmark eligible property is approximately 60 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important, or a local personality.
Fact/s: The property was owned by the Finleys, who were prominent
citizens of the community and proprietors of Finley Pharmacies.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Facts: The Spanish eclectic details, such as patterned tile, stone, roofing
material, and multiple surfaces including wood brackets are
unique. Other materials used from the period, which include glass
block and plate glass,are unique to the period of construction.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful and/or unusual.
Facts: The round tower and collection of materials are unusual.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of architectural
trends throughout the Red Hill area and historical continuity of the
neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or
city.
Fact/s: The wide frontage of the home and prominence has enhanced the
character of the neighborhood since its construction.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-05
DRC2001-00688— DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE
December 12, 2001
Page 3
5. Based'upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1,,,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission here by resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688, on the 12th day of
December 2001.
6. Any exterior alteration or addition to subject property, other than in-kind
improvements, shall be subject to review and approval by the Commission or its designee.
7.. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH'DAY OF DECEMBER 2001.
HISTORIC'PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
BY: ALC4 f /' s 'G
Larry T0,16Neil, Chairman
ATTEST:
rad Bull cretar
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 12th day
of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 01-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK'
DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 TO DESIGNATE THE KRYSTO
RANCH HOUSE AND PROPERTY AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERE OF—APN: 201-152-15.
A. Recitals.
1. Joseph and Linda J.L. Walker have filed an application for a Landmark as described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to
as "the application."
2. On August 8, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, it is here by found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission here by specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part'A;' of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.78 acres of land, rectangular in
configuration, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 8, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:.
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is .particularly representative of a historical
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies a historic period of the early 1900s, when a large
number of Russians emigrated from Russia due to civil and political.
unrest.
Fact/s: The property identifies with the Prohibition Era.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was
once common but is now rare.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION_ NO.01-04
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369
August 8, 2001
Page 2
Facts: The proposed landmark retains the architectural character of the Arts and
Crafts Movement, especially the Prairie Style. There is evidence of
masonry construction that was popular in the early 1900s.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark eligible,property is approximately 88 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important, and/or a local personality.
Facts: Dr. Krysto, a prominent member of the Alta Loma Community, owned the
property.
Fact/s: The property was owned by Frank Baumgarteker, a well-known
businessman from Los Angeles.
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which was
once common but is now rare.
Facts: The residence and row of Eucalyptus trees are reminiscent of the wine
industry and ranching that was once a common business and land use.
Facts: The residence identifies a period in time when it was considered
fashionable for the state's wealthy to own and live in"the country," as well
as own a house in "the city."
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed
landmark are unusual, significant, and/or uniquely effective.
Facts: The engineering methods such as the second story balcony, which is
cantilevered and covered by principal roof is unusual and uniquely
effective in keeping the character of the structure. The fieldstone facing is
a unique material and not usually found in the architecture and
engineering of today's homes.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or
its details and materials are beautiful and/or unusual.
Fact/s: The fieldstone facing, as well as the Arts and Craft Movement design are
beautiful, and are not common in today's homes.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-04
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369
August 8, 2001'
Page 3
Fact/s: The immediate vicinity of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road exhibits
three other historical resources; the Demens Tolstoy House, the
Grandma Issak House, and the Towes House to the north. The proposed
landmark contributes to the variety of architectural trends throughout the
Alta Loma area in the early 1900s, and historical continuity of the
neighborhood.
This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and is considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1,2,, and 3 above, this
Commission here by resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of the Landmark Designation DRC2001-00369 on the 8th day of
August 2001.
The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution..
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2001.
.HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
BY: �!'\e)cta-
L6rry T. eil, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad , Se
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and "adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 8th day
of August 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNtRL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERTNO
, RESOLUTION NO, 01-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2001-00116 FOR THE ISLE
HOUSE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7806 ETIWANDA
AVENUE-APN: 1089-071-26.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda Historical Society filed an
application for historic landmark alteration as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject landmark alteration is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 9, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the building located at 7806 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 9, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public.testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
FACT: The landmark alteration, as presented, will enhance and
promote the continued use of this historic landmark.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of an historic nature.
FACT: The proposed modifications are architecturally compatible
and will enhance the continued use of the structure. The
rehabilitation measures are in compliance with the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
r: . �,.
;.,. .
., � , . , .
, . , , � , .
_ - �..
. ,. � , .
.t
. ,. ,, ..
.' j. �...
HISTORIC PRESEVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-03
DRC2001-00116—LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT
May 9, 2001
Page 2
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-00016 subject to each and
every condition in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
1) This approval is contingent upon approval of Landmark Designation
DRC2001-00119 by the City Council.
2) All exterior site and building modifications shall be in conformance
with the plans and descriptions as contained in the Historic
Preservation Commission staff report dated May 9, 2001, and shall
be in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
3) Approval is granted for the alteration and restoration of the Isle
House into a community building as a museum and meeting place
for local historical societies to promote the history of the Etiwanda
area. The use of the building shall be formalized by written
agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the local
historical societies.
4) Construct a paved parking lot of at least 10 spaces, including two
handicap accessible spaces.
5) Install a decorative metal fence with pilasters along the easterly and
southerly property lines.
6) Plant trees along easterly and southerly property lines.
7) Construct a handicap access ramp to the rear of the building.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY 2001.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
n /
�( C
BY:
arry T. ell, Chairman
.. Ali � � _ . � i . ... .. i .
r ...
r. � ., i
..._ �t I� .. i � i n � n �. ..
.. i .. � .. r i .. i�. 1.
1
HISTORIC PRESEVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-03
DRC2001-00116— LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT
May 9, 2001
Page 3
ATTEST: �
Brad r, ecreta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed; and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day
of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#: Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-001 1 6 & Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP2001-00115
SUBJECT: Isle House
APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga/Etiwanda Historical Society
LOCATION: 7086'Etiwanda Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations,the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Community Services Overlay District.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal', encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
SC-04-01 1
Project No.DRC2001-00115,DRC2001-00116
Completion Date
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and•approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground:mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming,-and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and
,maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. DRC2001-00116. Any
further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior
alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees,
demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall
require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic,Preservation
Commission review and approval..
11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's
perimeter.
C. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. All parking spaces shall be,double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For
residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in
front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
5. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the.required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage
spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required•automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a
3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100.
Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher
whole number.
SC-04-01 2
Project No.DRC2001-00115.DRC2001-00116
Comoletion Date
D. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and,irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordancewith the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisrs
recommendations regarding'preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
4. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
E. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval,
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by.the Planning Division prior to installation,of any signs.
F. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide,a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
G. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following:
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of
service entrance conductors, panel schedules;and single line diagrams;
SC-04-01 3
Project No.DRC2001-00115.DRC2001-00116
Completion Date
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to
the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
H. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and
regulations in effect at the .time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public
counter).
I. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire,Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance,of permits,'whichever occurs:first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION
PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
J. Water Plans for Fire Protection
1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of
all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District.
2. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 1,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual
pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix '.III-A, as
amended. The required fire flow shall be,delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with
Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended.
SC-04-01 1 4
Project No.DRC2001-00115 DRC2001-00116
Completion Date
K. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
1. RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire ��—
sprinkler system.
L. Fire Access
1. Residential: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain ��—
approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes. All roadways or
fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards.
2. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: ��—
✓ All roadways per RCFPD Ordinance 22.
✓ Dead end exceeds 150 feet without approved Fire District turnaround.
3. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be
submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details
and ordering information.
4. Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system. Vehicle access gates shall shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. Additionally for vehicle
access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device will be required to open the
gate. The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch. Contact the
Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
M. Building Use Letter
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended
use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and approval. Contact the Fire Safety
Division for the form.
N. Architectural Building Plans
1. Prior to approval of a site developmentluse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever
occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of-the Fire District. Call the
Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be
placed on the plans prior to submittal.
O. Fire Alarm System
1. An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use
or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard.
P. Fees
1. Fire District fee(s), plus a$1.00 microfilm fee per"plan page"will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire District as follows:"
✓ $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee(CUP)
"Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire
sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be
assessed upon separate submittals of plans.
SC-04-01 5
Project No.DRC2001-00115,DRC2001-00116
Completion Date
Q. Hazard Control Permits
1. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use: /—
a. Operate a place of public assembly. /R. Plan Submittal Required Notice
1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building,
Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999, Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32,
Guidelines and Standards.
NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any
consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans.
NOTE: A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be,prepared, stamped and signed by a California
Registered Professional Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:.
S. Security Lighting'
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. �—
These areas should be lighted when open to the public and on photo sensored cell..
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/—/—
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall, be consistent around the entire
development.
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. —/—
T. Security Hardware
1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within /-
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
U. Security Fencing
1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police —/—/—
with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime
Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any
other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at
(909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or
extension 2475.
V. Windows
1, All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted / /—
from frame or track in any manner.
W. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /—
visibility.
SC-04-01 6
f
RESOLUTION 01-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-
00119 DESIGNATING THE ISLE HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK,
LOCATED AT 7086 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1089-071-26.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga .and the Etiwanda Historical Society filed an
application for historic landmark designation as described in the title of this ,Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 9, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A,"of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .55 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 9, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style„region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies the early era of the Etiwanda Colony lands.
Finding 2: The proposed: landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common, but is now rare.
Facts: The proposed landmark embodies distinctive characteristics of the
Second Empire architectural style, a style that was popular during
the Victorian Period, but is now rare.
.. � � _ 5 -
i. .. ..
' i�' i it ��' "l, .� i .�.: , ,_i.
i n�� � ..
., .- , . .. f . ',� f
.. r . . U ..
HISTORIC'PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 01-02
DRC2001-00119— HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION
May 9, 2001
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark eligible property is approximately 118 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Facts: George and William Chaffey, founders of the Etiwanda Colony, built
this residence:
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which
was once common, but is now rare.
Facts: The structure was used as a ranch house and originally sat on a
125-acre parcel of land used forcitrus ranching.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Facts: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the use
of details and craftsmanship that was once common, but is now
rare.
Finding 2: The overall .effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful, or details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The mansard; roof, decorative wood shingles, and turned wood
columns add to the beauty of the proposed landmark. They are
unusual in the design standards of today.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The Isle 'House is located on historic Etiwanda Avenue. Its
neighbors include the Chaffey-Garcia House, Etiwanda
Congregational Church, Norton-Fisher House, Etiwanda Depot,
Huber-Hame Ranch, and Stegmier residence.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
' � � •. � �.
i r
m.�..' � —h� .,. �
�. � , ,. ..,: Y,;F.,
.�i � .. i.
�. ,... .. u•.,
., - 'd _
e:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 01-02
DRC2001-00119— HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION
May 9, 2001
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Application DRC2001-00119.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY 2001.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
arry Tj. 1c iel, Chairman
ATTEST: ✓1
B er, See'ar ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day
of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
, t
..
\ .
` 1
... .. �.,.I. '. r
. I"
... ..' r ... ,
... it , � '... ,!. r � � �.
r ,... � ".� �.
Si .I ..... "It r . . � u._. ., .. .. J ..
.. t . . r.. .. . .
17Y
RESOLUTION NO. 01-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT DRC 2001-00086, FOR THE MCCORKLE-
NESBIT HOUSE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOCATED AT 7608
HELLMAN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
-APN: 202-073-43.
A. Recitals.
1. Scott Qowd-Lukesh filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
2. On April 11, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to an approximately 30,030 square foot parcel of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located at 7608'Hellman Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 11, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
Finding 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance.
Fact1s: The Landmark Alteration as presented will enhance and promote the
livability of this historic landmark.
Finding 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of a historic nature.
Facts: The proposed modifications are architecturally compatible and will
enhance the continued use of the structures and grove on the property.
1 .. i
., � — a'.
Pi � � . .
.. .. ...
- . .. .J
� . .
�. „
.,
,., - ..
., .;..
1 . .+ 'i.. _ — 7. i
�i � r.
Yi"
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-01
DRC2001-00086—SCOTT DOWD-LUKESH
April 11, 2001
Page 2
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2001-00086 subject to each and
every condition in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2001.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY:
Larry n1liel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad BdNZ2ecre ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 11th day
of April 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#: LANDMARK ALTERNATION PERMIT DRC2001-00086
SUBJECT: McCORKLE-NESBIT HOUSE
APPLICANT: SCOTT DOWD-LUKESH
LOCATION: 7608 HELLMAN AVENUE
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction l`
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Industrial Specific Plan.
2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
3. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
SC-12-00 1
Project No.DRC2001-00086
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
C. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and
regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
D. New Structures
1. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.
E. Grading
1. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT,
(909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
F. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 1,750 gallons per minute.a) For For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as follows:
a) $132 MDR fee.
"Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE
PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY
CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS.
NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS
BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND
FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A
CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER.
SCA 2-00 2
RESOLUTION NO. 00-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 00-04, DESIGNATING THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9488 19TH STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 201-474-02.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as
"the application."
2. On December 13, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 2.42 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located 9448 19th Street.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. . Historical and Cultural Sionificance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an
historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies the importance of education to the early
settlers of the Altar Loma area.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building, which
was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The building represents the single structure school house design
that was prevalent in the early part of the last century.
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark eligible property is approximately 114 years old.
The current structure was built in 1927 making it 73 years old.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-04
LID 00-04—CITY OF RC
December 13, 2000
Page 2
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
Facts: The current structure was built by Henry Klusman, a prominent
local architect and builder.
Finding 5: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: The site was used as a school house for the developing
community of Alta Loma. Such small town schools were once
common but are now rare.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1 : The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed Landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Facts: The use of reinforced concrete was unusual for this type of
structure and use at this period in time.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is
beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The restoration of the Mission style parapet and the formal stairs
will be elegant and an important architectural detail to the
structure.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The Alta Loma School site and structure remain in constant view
of the residents of the Alta Loma community, reminding them of
the early era of the community of Alta Loma.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark
Designation 00-04, subject to the following conditions.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-04
LD 00-04—CITY OF RC
December 13, 2000
Page 3
Planning Division
1) Removal of rock wainscoting.
2) Restoration of the Mission style parapet and entry stairs.
3) Reconditioning of exterior of the structure.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000.
HISTORIC PR ERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY:
arty iel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad B , ecreta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day
of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 00-03,
DESIGNATING THE CHARLES E. SMITH HOUSE A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9385 LOMITA AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 202-082-34.
A. Recitals.
1. Dave Rose filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this
'Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On December 13, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application, applies to approximately .17 acre of land, a rectangular
configuration, located 9385 Lomita Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The property identifies a historic period of the early to mid 1900s
when .the community of Alta Loma was growing and developing.
This neighborhood was one of the earliest tracts of homes.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building,
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence retains the architectural character of the Craftsman
Period with the use of the double hung casement style windows,
as well as the abundant use of wood on the exterior as a finishing
material (shiplap siding).
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-03
LID 00-03— DAVE ROSE
December 13, 2000
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark eligible property is approximately 72 years old, built
in 1928.
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
Facts: The property was owned, and built by Charles E. Smith, the first
pastor of the first church in the Alta Loma Community.
Finding 5: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Facts: This structure was used as the parsonage for Pastor Charles E.
Smith of The Pilgrim Church.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed Landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Fact/s: The engineering methods, such as the use of knee braces to
support the additional porches, as well as the abundant use of
wood as an exterior structural coverings, are unique and not found
in current construction and engineering methods.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is
beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The wood used as an exterior structural covering and the double
hung wood casement style windows are common design elements
found in Craftsman-style homes of the late 1920s.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
Facts: The immediate vicinity of Lomita Avenue and Amethyst Avenue
exhibits an abundance of historical resources. The type of
resources range from such potential local landmarks as Relph's
Garage, the Relph Home, the Derfer House, the George Klusman
House and such designated landmarks as the Alta Loma Fire Hall,
the Henry Albert Building, and the Emory-Allen House.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-03
LD 00-03— DAVE ROSE
December 13, 2000
Page 3
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations
comply with Class 8 categorical exemptions under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation 00-03 on the 13th day of
December 2000.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: A.1� )1? '
Larry T Nier Chairman
ATTEST-
Bra r, Se y
1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day
of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 00-02 TO DESIGNATE
THE GRANDMA ISAAK HOUSE AS A LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9611
HILLSIDE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERE OF —
APN: 1061-157-01.
A. Recitals.
1. Kimberly and Jay Pocock filed an application for a Landmark, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Landmark Designation request is referred
to as "the application."
2., On October 11, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is here by found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission here by specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 3 acres of land, a rectangular configuration
located at 9611 Hillside Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 11,2000, including written,and oral staff reports, togetherwith
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts.
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
FacUs: The property identifies a historic period of the early 1900s when a
number of Russians emigrated from Russia due to religious
persecution.
Findino2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building,which was
once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence retains the architectural character of the Colonial
Revival period and exhibits evidence of the masonry construction that
was popular circa 1905.
I
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 00-02
LID 00-02 - POCOCK
October 11, 2000 I
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark eligible properly is approximately 100 years old. The
structure is approximately 85 years old.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The property was owned by Katharine Issak, mother of Mrs.Abraham
K. Toews. The Toews family was Russian immigrants who contributed
greatly to the Russian and Mennonite communities.
Finding5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence, and rows of Eucalyptus trees are reminiscent of the
citrus industry and ranching that was once a common business and
use for land in the Rancho Cucamonga area.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
Fact/s: The engineering methods such as the open veranda, and the
decorated verge board consisting of a wooden arch, are unusual and
uniquely effective in keeping the character of the structure. The
fieldstone facing, is a unique material and is not usually found in
architecture and engineering in the homes of today.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful,
or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The open veranda, decorated verge board consisting of a wooden
arch, and fieldstone facing reinforce the style commonly found in grove
houses of the early 1900s.
Fact/s: Site orientation (to the south) adds to the rarity of the proposed
landmark.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
Fact/s: The immediate vicinity of Archibald Avenue and Hillside exhibits two
other historical resources, the Demens Tolstoy House and,the Toews
House. The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of
architectural trends throughout the Rancho Cucamonga area from the
early 1900s and historical continuity of the neighborhood.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 00-02
LID 00-02 - POCOCK
October 11, 2000
Page 3
4. This Commission hereby finds.that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4.above,this
Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code,the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends
approval to the City Council on the 1.1th day of October 2000, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2000.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
BY: ,A r
Larry cNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad-Wleff-AectejLW
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 11th day of October 2000, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION'
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 00-01 FOR THE ALTA LOMA
HONOR ROLL, LOCATED AT 6627 AMETHYST AVENUE - APN:
202-101-11.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to
consider all available comments on the proposed Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS; the Historic Preservation Commission received and reviewed all available
input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit..
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds,
determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at Assessor's.Parcel Number
202-101-11.
SECTION II: The proposed,Landmark Alteration meets the following criteria established in
Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance.
FACT: The Landmark Alteration as presented will enhance and promote the visibility
of this historic landmark.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of
an historic nature.
FACT: The proposed modifications are architecturally compatible,and will enhance the
continued use of the structure
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA Article 10, Section
15301.
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission and based
on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission approves Landmark Alteration Permit 00-01 for alterations to the Alta
Loma Honor Roll as described in the Staff Report dated August 23, 2000, with the following
conditions:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-01
LAP 00-01. —ALTA LOMA FIRE ASSOCIATION
August23,,2000
Page 2
1) All site and structure modifications shall be in conformance with the
plans and descriptions as contained in the Historic Preservation
Commission Staff Report dated August 23, 2000.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED.THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2000.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
G
BY: zz
La . cNiel, Chairman
r
ATTEST:
filer, S ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day
of August 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL,. STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 99-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT 99-01, FOR ALTERATIONS AT THE HISTORIC ALBERT
HOUSE LOCATED AT '10323 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1076-152-02.
A. Recitals.
1. Mr. and Mrs. La Parry have filed an application for the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit
99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark
Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application.
2. On the 23rd day of November 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, if is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 23, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property located at 10323 19th Street with a street frontage
of 166 feet and lot depth of approximately 325.8 feet and is presently improved.with the historic Henry
Albert house, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and fence along 19th Street; and improved curb and gutter along the
Hamilton Street frontage.
b. The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential;the property to the
south is single-family residential; the property to the east is developed with single-family residences, and
the property to the west is single-family residential; and
C. The Henry Albert house, on the property of the proposed application, was designated as
an Historic Landmark by the City Council on February 18, 1987; and
d. The application proposes using the second story of the two-car garage as a loft, and
providing restrooms and a two-car garage on the first level.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth it paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is,located; and
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-05
LAP 99-01 —ALBERT HOUSE
November 23, 1999
Page 2
b. The proposed use, together with the Landmark Alteration Permit, will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each
of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.
d. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed
project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in paragraphs 2 and 3 above, This
Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit 99-01, subject to each and every condition set
forth below.
Planning Division
1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the
Development Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or
any other City Ordinances.
2) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as
defined in the Development Code.
3) Any proposal for conversion of the loft area shall receive all necessary permits
and approvals by the City prior to installation or use thereof.
4) The garage and loft area shall not be used as a second dwelling unit. Use of the
structure for a second dwelling unit shall require review and approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission.
5) Construct paved parking lot per City standards with at least 27 parking spaces.
6) All materials and colors shall complement the primary residence.
Building and Safety Division
1) The applicant must submit full plans in order to complete Building Department
plan check process.
2) Plan check must include elevations of all four sides of the building.
Engineering
Construct the following perimeter street improvements:
1) Construction of a 4-foot sidewalk access to the Hamiliton Street frontage joining
the existing sidewalk to the west and terminating at the east property line.
2) Planting of street trees on Hamilton Street.
a) Street revision plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-05
LAP 99-01 —ALBERT HOUSE
November23, 1999
Page 3
completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to the
issuance of building permits.
b) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in
addition to any other permits required.
c) Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect
conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d) Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or
reconstruction of major, secondary, or collector streets which intersect with
other major, secondary, or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull
boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR,
ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
e) Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under-sidewalk drains
shall be installed to City standards, except for single-family lots.
f) Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer.
3) Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City
standards in accordance with the City's street tree program.
4) The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as
necessary.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY:
La )�
T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
B d er, Sec tary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day of November 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 99-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-03, DESIGNATING THE
HUBER RANCH/KALBACH HOUSE AN HISTORIC. LANDMARK, `
LOCATED AT 5991 HELLMAN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1062-232-21.
A. Recitals.
1. Kathleen Davis has filed an application for a Landmark Designation as described in t
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as
"the application."
2. On August 25, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1-acre of land (40,000 square feet), basically
a square configuration, located at 5991 Hellman Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 25, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The'proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the early 1900's when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community
and the region. The residence is an example of a grove house,
which was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark-eligible property is between 112 years old and an
example of modified "Bungalow" architecture and a common barn.
Finding 3: The proposed landmarkwas connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
HPC RESOLUTION 99-04
LD 99-03 - KATHERINE DAVIS
August 25, 1999
Page 2
Fact/s: The house and barn were built by Charles and. Jennie Huber.
Mr. Huber served on the Board of Directors of the Upland Lemon
Growers and had a financial interest in the first packing house built
in Alta Loma. The Huber and Kalbach families have a long
established involvement in the community.
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common, but is now rare.
Facts: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove, and farm houses.
Finding 5: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses and barns.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The residence is a single story wood structure of irregular design.
Roof is high hipped design with wood shingle. In general, the
architectural style further enhances the historic character of the
buildings in the area.
c., Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed,landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Facts: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety and historical
continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along Hellman Avenue and thereby contributes
to the entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt underCEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, Class 3.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of August 1999, of the Landmark Application.
HPC RESOLUTION 99-04
LD 99-03- KATHERINE DAVIS
August 25, 1999
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION�'COIMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: �% i/ /ri/
aj
artyNiel, Chairman
ATTEST-
Bra c er ecrdtary
1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 25th day of August 1999,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
RESOLUTION NO. 99-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02, TO
DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE(BUILT IN APPROXIMATELY 1934)AS
AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AT 6729 HERMOSA AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1076-111-09
A. Recitals.
1. Curry Brandaw Architects on behalf of the property owner has filed an application for
an Historic Landmark Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application."
2. On June 9, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 5.1 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 6729 Hermosa Avenue.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 9, 1999, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public
testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The house identifies the historic period of the early 1900's when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and
the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which
was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common, but is now rare.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99=03
LID 99-02 /CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 2
Facts: The landmark eligible property is 65 years old and is an example of
the use of native materials for the construction and design of a
mission style of architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The residence is a two-story structure in the Mission Style of
architecture. The exterior of the house is composed of native rock
on the first floor and stucco on the second floor. In general the
architectural style further enhances the historic character of the
buildings in the area.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are
exempt under CEQA, Section 15308 Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommends approval of Landmark Designation 99-02 subject to the following condition of approval:
Planning Division:
1) This Landmark Designation shall become effective on August 21, 1999,
or 45 days from the first reading of Development District Amendment
99-02.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
^ r
BY:,,, tom/ f/4t r
La . McNiel, Chairman
I
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-03
LID 99-021 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS
June 9, 1999
Page 3
ATTEST:
Bra Secr
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of June 1999, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: h1ACIAS, NANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-01, DESIGNATING THE
KOCH HOUSE (BUILT IN APPROXIMATELY 1908) AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7491 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1100-021-01.
A. Recitals.
1. Ronald L. and Kathleen J. Schulfer have filed an application for a Landmark
Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 26, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.5 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 26, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The property identifies an historic period of the early 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community
and the region. The residence is an example of a grove house
which was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Facts: The landmark-eligible property is 91 years old and an example of
Folk-Victorian architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
LD99-01 - RONALD & KATHLEEN SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 2
Fact/s: The house was built and lived in by the Fred Koch family for many
years. The Koch family has a long established involvement in the
local community.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Facts: The Folk-Victorian style is preserved and artfully incorporated into
the residence with such features as clapboard siding, decorative
diamond pane second story windows, and enhanced fan gable
treatment.
c. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety and historical
continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community,or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along EtiwandaAvenue and thereby contributes
to the entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 26th day of May 1999, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-02
LD99-01 - RONALD & KATHLEEN SCHULFER
May 26, 1999
Page 3
BY:
if-ar T cNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Secre
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed,and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 26th day of May 1999,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 99-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CHANGING THE HISTORIC DESIGNATION FROM A
LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK TO POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST
NO. 98-01 FOR FOUR HOUSES, LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634, AND
9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -APN: 208-153-08 THROUGH 11.
A. Recitals.
I
1. Anna Campos has requested a Point of Historic Interest designation as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic Interest is
referred to as "the application."
2. On January 13, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This.Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1 acre of land, basically four parcels of
rectangular configuration, located at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard.
3. The application applies to four houses which were designated as,a local Landmark on
October 5, 1994. Landmark Alteration Permits 94-04 and 96-02, and Development Review 93-15
were approved to convert the houses into commercial uses.
4. The application is in conjunction with a request to allow demolition of all four houses.
5. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly
representative of an historic period,type, style, region,
or way of life.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is an example
of a type of building which was once common but is
now rare.
Facts: The four houses were built between 1916 and 1927 in
the area known as"Old Cucamonga"which comprised
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-01
POI 98-01 -ANNA CAMPOS
January 13, 1999
Page 2
the downtown area. The structures are Craftsman
bungalow style architecture common to the era and
region in which they were built. The homes are
located within a block bounded by Foothill Boulevard
(Historic Route 66), Archibald and Klusman Avenues,
and Estacia Street and is one of the few remaining
intact neighborhoods from the late 1910s and the
1920s.
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected
with someone renowned or important or a local
personality.
Factls: The houses are located in an area that was within the
sphere-of-influence of John Klusman, a prominent
local businessman.
b. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed. Point of Historic Interest benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest, in its location,
represents an established and familiar visual feature
of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Facts: The houses were constructed pre-World War II in the
Craftsman architectural.style. Their prominent location
along Foothill Boulevard, Historic Route 66, makes
them a dominant part of the neighborhood character
and a familiar sight to the tens of thousands of people
who drive by each day.
6. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this
Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308.
7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
above,this Commission hereby resolves that pursuantto Chapter2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of the requested redesignation from Local Historic Landmark status
to Historic Point of Interest subject to each and every condition set forth below:
Planning Division
1) Provide on-site, a commemorative plaque consistent with the
standard City model with future development of the property.
8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-01
POI 98-01 -ANNA CAMPOS
January 13, 1999
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 1999.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
a-
BY:
a- I,,-Mjj'4j4
rty T. cNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
B ulle Se ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed,and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of January
1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 98-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 98-01, TO
DESIGNATE THE GUIDERA WINERY HOUSE (BUILT IN
APPROXIMATELY 1921) AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT
9801 MAIN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-
APN: 0209-062-23.
A. Recitals.
1. Northtown Housing Development Corporation (Nacho Gracia) has filed an application
for a Landmark Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 9, 1998, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .20 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 9801 Main Street.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 9, 1998, including written and oral staff reports,together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The house identifies the historic period of the early 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and
the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which
was common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is 77 years old and is an example of
Craftsman style architecture.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 98-02
LID 98-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
September 9, 1998
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned
or important or a local personality.
FacUs: The house was built and lived in by Joseph Guidera for many years.
The Guidera family has a long established involvement in the
community.
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
FacUs: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
FacUs: The residence is a single story structure of wood construction in the
Craftsman Style. The architectural style is preserved and
incorporated into the residence with such features as low pitch roofs
that beautifully incorporate the use of porches at the entrance to the
house and columns. In general the architectural style further
enhances the historical character of the buildings in the area.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308 Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommends approval of Landmark Designation 98-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1998.
HISTORIC PRES NATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Lar T McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
/ Bi d r, NZet
HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOLUTION NO. 98-02
LID 98-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
September 9, 1998
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of September
1998, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER
RESOLUTION NO. 98-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 98-01 FOR THE NESBIT -
MCCORKLE HOUSE, LOCATED AT7608HELLMAN-APN: 208-073-43.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held.a public hearing to consider all
available comments on the proposed Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all available
input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds,
determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at 7608 Hellman, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following criteria established
in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
r
FACT: The Landmark Alteration as presented will enhance and
promote the livability of this historic landmark.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of an historic nature.
FACT: The proposed modifications are architecturally compatible and
will enhance the continued use of the structures and grove on
the property.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA under Class 1.e of the
Guidelines for the California Quality Act.
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission and based
on the findings set forth above,
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation
Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 98-01 for alterations to the Nesbit -
McCorkle house as described in the Staff Report dated July 22, 1998, with the following
conditions:
1) All exterior site and building modifications shall be in conformance
with the plans and descriptions as contained in the Historic
Preservation Commission Staff Report dated July 22, 1998.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 98-01
LAP 98-01 - SCOTT AND MICHELLE LUKESH
July 22, 1998
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1998.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. Da ' arker, Ch ' man
ATTEST:
Brad er ecr to
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1998,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO, 97-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO RESCIND LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 92-02 AND REDESIGNATE AS AN HISTORIC POINT OF
INTEREST 97-02 FOR THE PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND ETIWANDA AVENUE AT 12912 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -
APN: 1100-061-02.
A. Recitals.
1. C.O.R. Properties has filed a request for redesignation of an existing Local Historic
Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
request for redesignation is referred to as "the application."
2. On November 12, and continued to 'December 10, 1997, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fourth in the Recitals,
Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.90 acres of land located at 12912 Foothill'
Boulevard.
3. The application applies,to the Pearson Filling Station and Garage which was designated
as a Local Historic Landmark on January 20, 1993.
4. The property owner has requested reconsideration, of said Local Historic Landmark
designation and requests changing the designation to a Point of Historic Interest.
5. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 12, and December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24,090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an
historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: Representing both the Etiwanda citrus community and the importance
of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the structure harkens
back to an era of agricultural growth and mass western migration.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-03
POI 97-02 - C.O.R. PROPERTIES
December 10, 1997
Page 2
Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the
station and its owners were an important part of the local area.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest is an example of a type of building
which was once common but is now rare. The proposed Point of
Interest is connected with a business or use which was once
common but is now rare.
Fact/s: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the automobile were
a prominent feature of many local landscapes, including the Etiwanda
area. Most of these roadside stations and garages have fallen out of
use or been abandoned or demolished. With their loss, physical
reminders of the everyday patterns that characterized community life
sixty years ago are fading.
The removal of the three-bay porte-cochere on the south side of the
structure significantly altered the appearance and function of the
building such that Local Landmark status is no longer warranted.
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: Opening shortly after the completion of Route 66 in 1926, the
Pearson Filling Station and Garage is one of the oldest such
structures extant.
Finding 4: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renown
or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The Pearson family was and is deeply connected with the cultural and
familial fabric of Etiwanda History.
Finding 5: The builder or architect was important.
Fact/s: Builder Henry Klusman was one of the more talented, competent, and
significant local builders to make the pages of this area's history
books.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed Point of Interest are unusual or significant or uniquely
effective.
Fact/s: The reserved, vernacular expression of the very popular Spanish
Revival architectural style demonstrates local interest in broader
stylistic trends.
The removal of the three-bay porte-cochere on the south side of the
structure significantly altered the appearance and function of the
building such that the Local Landmark status is no longer warranted.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-03
POI 97-02 - C.O.R. PROPERTIES
December 10, 1997
Page 3
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s: At the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the
station is the only remaining link to an important element of local
history and to an epoch of our national experience. Without it, all
physical traces of that portion of Route 66 will be lost.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest, in its location, represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community, or city.
Fact/s: For over 65 years, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage has been
a community resource and its previous owners, Pearson, Steven, and
Myers to name a few, added to the communal experience of the
Etiwanda area.
The removal of the three-bay porte-cochere on the south side of the
structure significantly altered the appearance and function of the
building such that the Local Landmark status is no longer warranted.
6. This Commission hereby finds that the application identified above in this Resolution is
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308.
7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of the requested redesignation from Local Historic Landmark status to Historic
Point of Interest for the Pearson Filling Station and Garage subject to each and every condition set
forth below:
Planning Division
1) Provide HABS/HAER documentation of the entire existing Pearson
Filling Station and Garage prior to any demolition. Ninety days prior to
demolition of the Pearson station, the owner shall offer the building to
all local preservation groups for relocation and the owner shall provide
an amount equal to the demolition costs to be used to assist in the
relocation. If the structure is relocated and preserved, then
HABS/HAER documentation is not necessary.
2) Provide on-site, a commemorative plaque consistent with the standard
City model with future development of the property.
8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-03
POI 97-02 - C.O.R. PROPERTIES
December 10, 1997
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997.
BY: i, (I I I
E. e , Ch man
ATTEST:
Brad a ec etary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 1,Oth day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO.97-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 97-02, DESIGNATING THE
GEORGE CHERBAK HOUSE (BUILT APPROXIMATELY 1929) A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9953 HILLSIDE ROAD AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1074-211-31.
A. Recitals.
1. Deborah and Andrew Burger have filed an application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On October 22, 1997, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of^Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the.Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .53 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 9953 Hillside Road.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October'22, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the early 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and
the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which was
common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 68 years old and an example of
Victorian architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built and lived in by the George Cherbak family for
many years. The Cherbak family has a long established involvement
in the local community
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-02
LD97-02 - DEBRAH &ANDREW BURGER
October 22, 1997
Page 2
Finding 4: The proposedlandmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence and garage are indicative of the style and design used
by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful
or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The Victorian style is preserved and artfully incorporated into the
residence with such features as a steep pitched roof and thick rock
walls.
c. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety and historical
continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along Hillside Road and thereby contributes to the
entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 22nd day of October 1997, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 1997.
HIST SERVA 10 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. avid;Bark r, airman
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-02
LD97-02 -DEBRAH &ANDREW BURGER
October 22, 1997
Page 3
ATTEST:
Brad a ecr tary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and regularly introduced, ,passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 22nd day of October 1997, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 97-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 97-01, DESIGNATING THE
NESBIT-MCCORKLE HOUSE (BUILT APPROXIMATELY 1924) A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7608 HELLMAN AVENUE AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 208-073-43.
A. Recitals.
1. Scott and Michelle Lukesh have fled an application for a Landmark as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On July 23, 1997, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.31 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 5708 Hellman Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 23, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of the early 1900s when
grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the Community and
the region. The residence is an example of a.grove house which was
common at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 73 years old and an example of
Mission architecture.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, or
important, or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by G.P. McCorkle and lived in by the R. Nesbit
family for many years. Both the McCorkle and Nesbit families had a
long established involvement in the local community.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97-01
LD 97-01 - LUKESH
July 23, 1997
Page 2
Finding 4: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence and garage are indicative of the style and design used
by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful
or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The Mission style is preserved and artfully incorporated into the
residence with such features as a front porch, stuccoed walls, and
site orientation.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety and historical
continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along Hellman Avenue and thereby contributes to
the entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of July 1997, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY 1997.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
vid Barker, airman
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 97=01
LID 97-01 LUKESH
July 23, 1997
Page 3
A:rad
EST:
B u Secre ry
I, Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic,Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day of July 1997,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 96-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 96-02 TO DESIGNATE
THE LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES, INC. THEATER, LOCATED AT
10071 FERON BOULEVARD, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST -
APN: 209-085-04.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Point of Historic Interest
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic
Interest is referred to as "the application."
2. On December 11, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .36 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard approximately 100 feet west of Hermosa
Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 11, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or
way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies an historic period of transition from
the agrarian community to a suburban/urban setting and
the activities of the minority community that thrived in the
area known as Northtown.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is an example of a
type of building which was once common but is now rare.
fact/s: As the one remaining theater from the two originally
serving the community it is clearly a rare example.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-07
POI 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
December 11, 1996
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected with
someone renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for
over 30 years provided needed community resources and
activities.
Finding 4: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with
a business or use which was once common but is now
rare.
Fact/s: The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for
30 years provided needed community resources and
activities.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest materially benefits
the historic character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s: As the one remaining theater from the two originally
serving the community it clearly contributes to the variety
and historical continuity of the neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest, in its location,
represents an established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or City.
Fact/s: The Building at approximately 5,400 square feet represents
one of the last remaining larger community serving
structures in the community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered eligible
for Landmark designation. Therefore the Commission encourages the property owner to return for
a Landmark Designation if the theater is retained and rehabilitated.
5. The Commission recommends that upon any future discretionary City approvals, a
condition for an adequate historic sign or plague be required.
6. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above, this
Commission hereby recommends approval of Historic Landmark designation for Point of Historic
Interest Designation 96-02.
8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APP AN i DO TED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1996.
BY:
d Barker, airman
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-07
POI 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
December 11, 1996
Page 3
ATTEST•
Bra er Secrelkary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 11th day of December 1996, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 96-0&
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 96-02 FOR EXTERIOR CHANGES
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF TWO SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCES TO COMMERCIAL USE, LOCATED AT 9634 AND
9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-APN: 208-153-24.
A. Recitals.
1. Ana Campos has filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit
request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of August 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the buildings currently located at 9634 and 9642 Foothill
Boulevard (APN: 208-153-24).
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 14, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
FACT: The Ordinance encourages the adaptive reuse of historic
structures to preserve their longevity and viability within the
community.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of an historic nature.
FACT: The addition will tie the structures together, yet preserves their
individual front facades. The improvements will integrate the
structures into the .Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan activity
centerwhile maintaining the historical significance of the area.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
LAP 96-02 - CAMPOS
August 14, 1996
Page 2
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a mitigated Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
,thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Historic Preservation Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, together with the mitigation measures incorporated,herein, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as
a whole, the Initial Study and .Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and.the information provided to the Planning Commission
during the public hearing, the Historic Preservation.Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below.
Environmental Mitigation Measures
1) The addition shall be designed using materials consistent with the
building designs. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Planner prior to building permit issuance.
2) The units shall be restored using materials, details, and workmanship
consistent with the original design and era of construction. The final
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to
building permit issuance.
3) The chimney at 9642 Foothill Boulevard shall be preserved or replaced
in kind, consistent with the original design. The final plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit
issuance.
4) Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the plans submitted and
provided with the Staff Report dated August 14, 1996, and consist of
modifications that will match the existing materials and finishes of the
structures.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
LAP 96-02 - CAMPOS
August 14, 1996
Page 3
5) A sign, no more than 4 square feet in area, shall be provided near the
new restaurant entrance on the north elevation, to identify and educate
the public regarding these historic structures. The final design,
location, and wording shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
6) Any signs shall be designed compatible with the architectural style of
the structures.
7) Delete new double door facing Foothill Boulevard, if allowed by code,
or simplify design.
8) Roof material shall be concrete tile to fit in with the design, color, and
texture of the California bungalow architectural style, to the satisfaction
of the City Planner.
9) Delete proposed truss within gable over front door at 9642 Foothill
Boulevard and retain as is.
10) Preserve or duplicate existing architectural details, such as window trim
shapes, window mullions, and gable brackets.
11) Preserve existing sidelight window mullions flanking both front entry
doors facing Foothill Boulevard.
12) All new light fixtures, including parking lot lighting, shall be consistent
with architectural style.
General
1) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic Preservation
Commission, if the structures are not altered as approved within 24
months from the date of this approval.
2) The existing front porches may be used for outdoor dining.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 1996.
HIS PRaRVATIOSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Davi Bar er, Chairman
ATTEST
Larry . enderson, Acting Secretary
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
LAP 96-02 - CAMPOS
August 14, 1996
Page 4
I, Larry J. Henderson, Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of
August 1996, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 96-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE.HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 96-02, TO DESIGNATE THE
PALMER RANCH, LOCATED AT 5708 HELLMAN AVENUE, AS A
LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN:
1061-761-07.
A. Recitals.
1. Marie and John Barna have filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the
application."
2. On July 10, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.31 acres of land, basically a rectangle
configuration, located at 5708 Hellman Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 10, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative.of an historic
period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The property:identifies an historic period of the early 1900s when
groves and vineyard production was at its peak in the Alta Loma
Community .and the region. The residence is an example of the
Craftsman Architecture prevalent at the turn of the century.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was
once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence and garage/barn retain the architectural character of
the Craftsman period, which was a predominate development type at
the turn of the century.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-05
LID 96-02 - PALMER RANCH
July 10, 1996
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 81 years old and an example of
Craftsman architecture.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned.or
important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by Ernest J. and Carrie Palmer. The Palmers
had a long established involvement in employing local residents in the
grape vineyard and dried fruit industries.
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence and garage/barn are;indicative of the style and design
used by the once prevalent but now rare rural grove and farm
houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful
or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: . The Craftsman style is preserved and artfully'incorporated into the
residence with such features as front and rear porches, rafter bracing
details, and site orientation.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of
the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The vicinity of Hellman and Wilson Avenues exhibits one other
historical resource, the G. P. Ledig Residence. The proposed
landmark contributes to the variety and historical continuity of the
neighborhood.
Finding,2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Facts: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a significant
identifiable feature along Hellman Avenue and,thereby contributes to
the entire neighborhood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as landmark designations are
exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-05
LD 96-02 - PALMER RANCH
July 10, 1996
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of July 1996, of the Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1996.
HISTORIC P COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
icl Bar er, Ch irman
ATTEST:
Brad�B I e S cretary
I, Brad Buller,, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of July 1996,
by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER,LUMPP,MCNEIL,TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 96-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-01 FOR THE MALOOF HOUSE AND
WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9553 HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE MOVED
TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND ALMOND STREETS
- APN: 1061-281-16.
A. Recitals.
1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for a Landmark
Alteration Permit as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to the residence and workshops currently located at 9553
Highland Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga and proposed to be moved to a 5.54 acre site at the
southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
Finding: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
Fact: The Landmark Alteration, as conditioned, will enhance and
promote the economic viability of this historic landmark.
Finding: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or
engineering interest or value of an historic nature.
Fact: The proposed modifications will rehabilitate and assist in the
continued use of the structures and grove on the new site.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-04
LAP 96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE)
April 24, 1996
Page 2
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based
upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Historic Preservation Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as
a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission
during the public hearing, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below.
a) All exterior site and building modifications shall be submitted to
Planning Division staff in the form of detailed plans and specifications
before moving or building permit issuance, whichever comes first.
b) All replacement materials shall be of in-kind type, size, and quality
whenever possible.
c) The new residence and garage shall be designed to match the house
and shall be in conformance with the plans presented with this
application.
d) All Plans and specifications shall conform to the Secretary of Interior
Standards for rehabilitation and be reviewed and accepted by the
California Office of Historic Preservation.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-04
LAP 96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE)
April 24, 1996
Page 3
BY:
i Bar er, Chairma
ATTEST:
rad B er ec t
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 96-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 96-01 TO DESIGNATE THE
MALOOF RESIDENCE AND WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9553 HIGHLAND
AVENUE AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF -APN: 202-101-18.
A. Recitals.
1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for a Landmark
designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark designation request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 5 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 9553 Highland Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The property is the home and studio of the internationally
acclaimed woodworker and furniture designer Sam Maloof
and his wife Alfreda Ward Maloof, a former Santa Fe
museum and crafts program director. Sam Maloof began
making furniture at his Alta Loma workshop in the 1950s.
His work can be seen in a number of American museums
and has been featured in numerous television and film
productions as well as popular and scholarly works on
American furniture and crafts. His home/studio has been
a pilgrimage site for local colleges and universities, and
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-03
LD96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE)
April 24, 1996
Page 2'
the Gamble House Associates of Pasadena conduct an
annual tour to the property.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used
in the proposed Landmark are unusual or significant or
uniquely effective.
Fact/s: The home/studio exhibits an exceptional level of
craftsmanship and design. Hand-built homes became
part of the popular culture of the 1960s and 1970s as part
of the back-to-earth counterculture movement.
Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark
is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or
unusual.
Fact/s: Sam Maloof house and workshop are both the products.
of necessity which evolved over time. The house is also
a product of its builders creativity and his love of his craft
and its raw material, wood. Every detail is crafted to
reflect Maloof sense of design and passion for wood.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, as Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section
15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation 96-01.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996.
HISTO QN MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
airman
ATTEST:
Brad B ecret
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96-03
LD96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE)
April 24, 1996
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 96-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST TO DESIGNATE THE
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH AND T. INGVALDSEN AND SONS
STORE/REGINA RESTAURANT SITES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AS A POINTS OF
HISTORIC INTEREST-APN: 227-211-24 AND 25 AND 227-221-01, 02, AND
14.
A. Recitals.
1. E.F. Moore & Associates has filed an application for a Historic Landmark or Point of
Historic Interest designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Point of Historic Interest is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 10, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 56.8 acres of land generally located north of
Foothill Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, and southeast of Interstate 15.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 10, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed sites were connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The Scared Heart Catholic Church provided a gathering
location for many of the prominent residents of the
Etiwanda area. Of particular note are the Italian wine-
making families of the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda
Avenue area including, but not limited to, the Guidera,
DiCarlo, Schiro, and Masi families who were involved in
the Church at some point.
The T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store was owned and
operated by Thorwald Ingvaldsen from 1914 to 1941,
supplying various construction supplies and general
merchandise to the Etiwanda area. In 1941, the store
was converted to a restaurant by the John Prevedello
family. Don Casaletti and Don Columbero took over the
operation of the restaurant in 1945.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-02
POI 96-01 - MOORE
January 10, 1996
Page 2
Finding 2: The proposed,sites are connected with a business or use
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The Sacred Heart Catholic Church provided a major focus
for the Etiwanda community with its location on Foothill
Boulevard. While the Church plans to relocate to another
part of Etiwanda, the location on Foothill Boulevard will be
lost.
The T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store provided construction
supplies and general merchandise for the Etiwanda
residents. The general store was one of three general
stores in the Etiwanda area in the early 1900s and the
only one located on Foothill Boulevard.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said 'Negative 'Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Historic Preservation Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as
a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Historic Preservation
Commission during the public hearing, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Point of Historic Interest 96-01 including the
following conditions:
1) With demolition of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church, any new
development shall be required to install a plaque commemorating the
social contributions made bythe church in the Etiwanda-area. The final
location, design, and wording of the plaque shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The
plaque installation shall be completed prior to occupancy of any
structures on the site.
2) Development of the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Etiwanda Avenue shall require the placement of a plaque
commemorating the site of the T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-02
POI 96-01 - MOORE
January 10, 1996
Page 3
established in 1914 and, later, its conversion to the Regina Restaurant.
The final location, design, and wording of the plaque shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The
plaque installation shall be completed prior to occupancy of any
structures on the site.
6. The Chairman,of,this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 1996.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMI SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:.
Da ' BgrVer, Chairm
ATTEST:
Brad II , Secr ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do ,hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of January 1996, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER
RESOLUTION NO. 96-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 95-03 TO DESIGNATE THE COUR
HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7567 ETIWANDA AVENUE AS A LANDMARK -
APN: 1100-031-06.
A. Recitals.
1. Charles and Fredella Gibbons have filed an application for Landmark Designation 95-03,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark
Designation is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 10, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A" of this Resolution, are true and correct.
2.. The application applies to approximately .51 acres of land, basically a 115-foot by
189-foot "C" configuration, located at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to 'this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 10, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The house is a distinct representation of Dutch Colonial
architecture.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its
kind.
Fact1s: The house is at least 75 years old.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The house is currently being restored and will add an
aesthetic historical character to the neighborhood.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-01
LID 95-03 - GIBBONS
January 10, 1996
Page 2
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or City.
Fact/s: The home is familiar significant feature from the former
Etiwanda Colony lands and is located on the original
construction site.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, as Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Class 3.e of
Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation 95-03.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 1996.
HISTORIC P TION OF T I Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. id Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
1,ZBrad 13 a ret ry
adBuller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of January 1996, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER
RESOLUTION NO. 95-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 95-03 FOR THE
REMOVAURELOCATION OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
DESIGNATED AS LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND
KLUSMAN AVENUES AT 9634 AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- APN:
208-153-08 AND 09.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing
to consider all available comments on the proposed Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all available
input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds,
determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the buildings located on Assessor's Parcel Numbers
208-153-08 and 09.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration Permit fails to meet the following criteria
established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is not consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
FACT: The application proposes the removal of two local landmarks
inconsistent with the goals of preserving and/or adaptive reuse of
historic structures.
FINDING: The action proposed will be detrimental to a structure or feature
of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering
interest or value of a historic nature.
FACT: The Landmark designation was established based on the setting'
and context of the structures. The application proposes the
removal of two of the four structures, significantly altering the
historical setting and context of the structures.
SECTION III: Based upon the facts and information contained in the written and oral reports
included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Historic Preservation Commission
finds that the project could have a significant effect upon the environment. The applicant has
provided insufficient information to identify where the house will be relocated and what mitigation
measures will be applied to the site to mitigate the loss of cultural resources with the removal of two
of the four houses designated as Local Landmarks.
SECTION IV: Based upon the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission and based
on the findings set forth above, the Commission hereby denies the application.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-07
LAP 95-03 - CAMPOS
December 13, 1995
Page 2
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1995.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION C—Q=SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
e Chairman
ATTEST:
rod II , S cr tary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of December 1995, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 95-02 TO DESIGNATE THE NEIL
D.'AND EMMA S. HICKCOX RESIDENCE AND GARAGE, LOCATED AT
6878 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK-APN: 227-041-09.
A. Recitals.
1. Daniel and Elaine Winkelpleck have filed an application for Landmark Designation 95-02
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
2. On September 13, 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .34 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 6878 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 13, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies a historic period of the 1930s when
citrus and vineyard production was at its peak in the
Etiwanda Community and the region. The residence is an
example of the bridging of the turn of the century
agricultural lifestyle with the inclusion of modern features
such as inside bathrooms and modern electrical wiring in
all rooms.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact1s: The residence and garage retain the architectural
character of the Spanish Revival period, which was a
predominate development type in Southern California but
was truly rare in the Etiwanda Community.
HPC RESOLUTION95-06
LD 95-02 - DANIEL & ELAINE WINKELPLECK
September 13, 1995
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its
kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is 64 years old and a rare
example of Spanish Revival architecture.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by Neil and Emma Hickcox. Both.Neil
and Emma are the children of two Etiwanda Colony
settlers and the families had a long established
involvement in the grape vineyard and citrus industries.
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or
use which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style, and modern
conveniences available by the 1930s with such features as
indoor plumbing and all electrical appliances that act as a
historical demarcation with the previous rural grove and
farm houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark
is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or
unusual.
Fact/s: The Spanish Revival style is preserved and artfully
incorporated into the residence with such features as tiled
entry and patio porches, second floor balconies, tiled roofs
of varied height and orientation, and interior hardware.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s: The vicinity of Etiwanda and Victoria Avenues exhibit
several historical resources and the proposed landmark
contributes to the variety and historical continuity of the
neighborhood.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community, or city.
Fact/s: The residence and its mature landscaping represent a
significant identifiable feature along Etiwanda Avenue and
thereby contributes to the entire neighborhood.
HPC RESOLUTION 95-06
LD 95-02 - DANIEL & ELAINE WINKELPLECK
September 13, 1995
Page 3
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Landmark Designation 95-02.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND A PTED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1995.
BY:
D irman
ATTEST-
Bra retary 7ecretary
e , S
I, Brad Buller, of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of September 1995, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 95-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 95-01 TO DESIGNATE THE ETIVISTA
WINERY, LOCATED AT 12742, 12762, 12768, and 12774 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST - APN: 227-221-03
AND 22 THROUGH 24.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Point of
Historic Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic Interest is .referred to as "the
application. "
2. On August 9, 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A, " of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 4.20 acres of land, basically
four parcels of rectangular configuration, located 12742, 12762, 12768, and 12774
Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on August 9, 1995, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the
following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest was
connected with someone renowned or important
or a local personality.
Fact s: Oral interviews with Buster. Filpi (nephew of
Nick DiCarlo) , confirmed building records
that the Etivista Winery was started in 1936.
The winery was a partnership between Nick
DiCarlo, Frank Shiro, and Buster Filpi.
Undoubtedly this winery was part of the
tremendous growth in wine-making experienced
at the end of prohibition. These three
families were very instrumental in the
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-05
POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY
August 9, 1995
Page 2
establishment of the ethnically diverse
vintner community of the Cucamonga Valley
Wine Region.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is
connected with a business or use which was
once common but is now rare.
Fact s: In terms of historical significance, the
winery did not play a significant historical
role in the winery industry of the region;
i.e. , there were, and are, other sites that
were larger and operated longer. The major
historical significance is that the original
partnership was composed of related family
members that were active in the wine-making
region from the early 1900s to the 1970s at
other sites. At the height of winery
production, the Cucamonga Winery Region
boasted of ninety-nine operating wineries.
Presently, there are approximately six
remaining sites that retain varying degrees
of historical value within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Article 19, section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Point of Historic
Interest 95-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 1995.
HISTORIC PR F COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. 'd Bar , Chairman
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-05
POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY
August 9, 1995
Page 3
ATTEST:
Brad B r, ecr ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of August 1995, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT 95-02 FOR THE KINCAID RANCH HOUSE, LOCATED
AT 9449 NINTH STREET - APN: 209-032-21.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised
public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed Landmark
Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all
available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically
finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at 9449 Ninth
Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following criteria
established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes
of this Ordinance.
FACT: The Landmark Alteration as conditioned will enhance
and promote the economic viability of this historic
landmark.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic,
cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or
value of an historic nature.
FACT: The proposed modifications will rehabilitate and
assist in the continued use of the structures and
grove on the property.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA under
Class 3.e of the Guidelines for the California Quality Act.
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission
and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 95-02 for
alterations to the Kincaid Ranch house as described in the Staff Report dated May
10, 1995, with the following conditions:
1) All exterior site and building modifications shall be
submitted to Planning Division staff in the form of
detailed plans and specifications before installation or
building permit issuance, whichever comes first.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-04
LAP 95-02 - DAVID R. MOORE
May 10, 1995
Page 2
2) All replacement materials shall be of in-kind type, size,
and quality whenever possible.
3) The future deck shall be designed to match the house and
shall be subject to review by the Planning Division
Staff.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF MAY 1995. I
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. D vid Bark , Chairman
ATTEST: cr Bra ul r, Se ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the loth day of May 1995, by the following vote-
to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 95-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 95-01 TO DESIGNATE THE KINCAID
RANCH HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9449 NINTH STREET, AS A LANDMARK -
APN: 209-032-21.
A. Recitals.
1. David R. Moore has filed an application for a Landmark as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 10, 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .55 acres of land, basically
a 100-foot by 240-foot configuration, located at 9449 Ninth Street and shown in
Exhibit 111" attached.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 10, 1995, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following
findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly
representative of an historic period, type,
style, region, or way of life.
ct s: The property still illustrates the historic
late 1800s and early 19008 of the
agricultural community of Cucamonga.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type
of building which was once common but is now
rare.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-03
LANDMARK 95-01 - DAVID R. MOORE
May 10, 1995
Page 2
Fact s: The grove house and accessory structures
retain the agricultural character of the turn
of the century period, which was the
predominant development type.
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than
most of its kind.
Fact s: The landmark eligible property is 97 years
old and has been in citrus grove production
almost continuously over that period of time.
Finding 4: The proposed Landmark was connected with
someone renowned or important or a local
personality.
Fact s: The house was built byS. P. Kincaid in 1897,
approximately a year after his marriage. A
brother of S. P. Kincaid, William J. Kincaid,
served as Cucamonga Postmaster from 1885 to
1890 and was also a County Supervisor.
Finding 5: The proposed Landmark is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is
now rare.
act s: Originally acquired in the late 1870s by the
previous owner's family, it has been in
continuous citrus production for over 90
years.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Section 15308 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark
Application 95-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVE ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF MAY 1995.
BY:
E. Dav' Barker, Chairman
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-03
LANDMARK 95-01 - DAVID R. MOORE
May 10, 1995
Page 3
ATTEST:
Br B r, Secre ry
I Brad Bul r, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the loth day of May 1995, by the following vote-
to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
i
EXISTING AVOCADO
\ I TREES TO REMAIN
47
- 0 0
0 0 A 0 0 0 !
------------------- ------------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------------
DECK WALKWAY
TO REMAIN �—
0� PROPOSED BARN 0 I
FUTURE 54' X 30' EXISTING
EXISTING PARKING 1620 s.f. RESIDENCE
162'
i SHED 15• 17504, PALM TREES
44D 0 0 TO REMAIN
I
I
LINE OF HIST i APRON •
Omf3t z5e 26' DRIVE WAY 10
ESHED G O O O O O
440¢+ /� GRAVEL EXISTING DRIVEWAY
� APRON TO REMAIN L
I7 I L L 0 G O 0 G
GRAVEL
77
PROPERTY LINE i I
0 - 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 _0--. C�
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------•----•-----•---------•----
RESOLUTION NO. 95-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT
NO. 95-01 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET WIDENING AT THE INTERSECTION OF
HIGHLAND AND EAST AVENUES.
A. Recitals
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the issuance
of Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. 95-01 as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic Landmark
Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application. "
2. On the 22nd day of February 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution, are true and correct.
2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on February 22, 1995, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 25 palm and eucalyptus
trees located west of the intersection of Highland and East Avenues.
b. The application proposes the relocation and replacement of several
of the historic trees along Highland Avenue.
C. The alteration is necessary to accommodate the widening and
drainage work at the intersection.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above referenced meeting and upon, the specific findings of facts set forth
in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
a. The action proposed is consistent.. with the purposes of Ordinance
No. 70; and
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-02
LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
February 22, 1995 `
Page 2
b. The action will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value
of an historic nature; and
C. The proposed action is not in conflict with the provisions of the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings
as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA
guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning
Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the
information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental
effects will occur.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for
the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential
for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby
rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of
Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below.
1) Palm trees shall be relocated to selected spots along
Highland Avenue as approved by the City Planner and
eucalyptus trees which require removal shall be replaced
in conformance with Chapter 5.41 of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan and subject to detail plans approved by the City
Planner.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-02
LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
February 22, 1995
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 1995.
HISTORIC PRES ONMCqair
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY•
E. Davi r
ATTEST:
Br 1 , ecre ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do 'hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the 22nd day of February 1995, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT 94-04 FOR EXTERIOR CHANGES IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES TO
COMMERCIAL USES, LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634, AND 9642
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208-153-08 THROUGH 11.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised
public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed Landmark
Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed
all available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically
finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the buildings located on
Assessor's Parcel Number 208-153-08 through 11.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes
of this Ordinance.
FACT: The Ordinance encourages the adaptive reuse of historic
structures to preserve their longevity and viability within
the community.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural,
architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic
nature.
FACT: The installation of the improvements will result in a
pedestrian scale more appropriate for the single story
structures. The ramps will be located at the rear or side of
the structures and can be easily screened from the public
street. The improvements will integrate the structures into
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan activity center while
maintaining the historical significance of the area.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-01
LAP 94-04 - CAMPOS
January 11, 1995
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 94-04 for
alterations to 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard as described in the
Staff Report dated January 11, 1995, with the following conditions:
1) The access ramps shall be designed using materials
consistent with the building designs. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior
to building permit issuance.
2) Landscaping shall be installed adjacent to the ramps to
minimize their visibility from public view. The final
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to building permit issuance
) 3) The units shall be restored using materials, details, and
workmanship consistent with the original design and era
of construction. The final plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to building permit
issuance.
4) At least one chimney each shall be provided on Houses No.
1, 3, and 4 consistent with the original design. The
final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to building permit issuance.
5) Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the
plans submitted and provided with the Staff Report dated
January 11, 1995, and consist of modifications that will
match the existing materials and finishes . of the
structures.
6) Signs, no more than 4 square feet in area, shall be
provided to identify and educate the public regarding
these historic structures. The final design, location,
and wording shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to issuance of building permits.
7) Any signs shall be designed compatible with the
architectural style of the structures.
8) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the structures are not
altered as approved within 24 months from the date of
this approval.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-01
LAP 94-04 - CAMPOS
January 11, 1995
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 1995.
HISTORIC PRE N aCOMIMF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
. D r, Chairma
ATTEST: f ��
0
ra Ile Sec
7etar
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and- adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission held on the llth day of January 1995, by the following
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 94-03 FOR THE KLUSMAN HOUSE,
LOCATED AT 8841 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA - APN: 207-211-13
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed
Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 207-211-13.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the
purposes of this Ordinance.
FACT: The wheelchair ramp along the south side of the
building can be screened to make it less obtrusive. The
ramp will not detract significantly if it is redesigned
in this fashion.
FACT: The proposed exterior staircase will not detract
significantly from the house if screened and painted to
blend in with the home.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth in Section II,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 94-03 for
alterations to the Klusman House as described in the Staff Report dated
September 14, 1994, subject to the following conditions:
1) Prior to final commercial occupancy of the house,
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner which indicate the screening of the
wheelchair ramp with a row of shrubbery.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-06
LAP 94-03 - KLUSMAN HOUSE
September 14, 1994
Page 2
2) The exterior staircase shall be designed in a manner
which permits easy removal if the current tenant
vacates the location and/or when it is determined to
no longer be necessary to provide a second means of
exiting for the second story.
3) The base of the stairway shall be screened with
shrubs and trees along the west and south sides.
4) The stairway shall be painted to match the building.
5) The support columns of the stairway shall be
relocated to align with the entire edge of the
doorway on the first floor. Revised plans shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior
to final occupancy by the proposed tenant.
6) Prior to the issuance of building permits, staff
shall approve a landscape and irrigation plan.
APPROVED AND ADOP S DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1994.
HISTORI RES TION COMMISSION F T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. Davi Barker, Chairman
ATTEST•
Bra lle Cretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of September 1994, by
the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER., LUMPP, MELCHER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 94-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-02 TO DESIGNATE FOUR HOUSES LOCATED AT
9618, 9626, 9634, AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS LOCAL
LANDMARKS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, AND 11.
A. Recitals.
1. Ana Campos has filed an application for approval of Landmark
Designation No. 94-02 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of July and continued to the 27th day of July
and the loth day of August 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part "A, " of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on July 13, July 27, and August 10,
1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The applications applies to property located on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman Avenues at 9618,
9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard; and
b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site
are designated for specialty commercial uses and are developed with single
family residences. The property to the south is designated for commercial
uses and is developed with a fast food restaurant. The property to the east
is designated for specialty commercial uses and contains an out-of-use,
potential historic gas station; and
C. The application contains four single family residences that
were built between 1916 and 1927; and
d. The block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Archibald and
Klusman Avenues, and Estacia Street is one of the remaining intact
neighborhoods from the late 1910s and the 1920s; and
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-05
LD 94-02 - CAMPOS
August 10, 1994
Page 2
e. The Craftsman bungalows were indicative of the
architectural style of the late 1910sand the 1920s; and
f. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan identifies the
bungalows as notable structures; and
g. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan encourages the
establishment of land uses to complement existing cultural and historic
resources; and
h. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires new projects
to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures; and
i. The site was under the control and influence of John
Klusman during the 1930s.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
fact set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
A. Historical and Cultural significance:
1. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative
of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of
life.
2. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare and the
proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use
which was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed Landmark was connected with someone
renowned, important, or a local personality.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or city.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section
15308.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-05
LD 94-02 - CAMPOS
August 10, 1994
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the
application subject to the following condition:
1) The houses shall be restored/rehabilitated
consistent with the architectural style and
details of the era of construction. The final
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
arry T McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad ul r, re ry ec
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the loth day of August 1994, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 94-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT
NO. 94-02 FOR THE ERNST MUELLER HOUSE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND EAST AVENUES, 6563 EAST AVENUE -
APN: 227-071-17.
A. Recitals•
1. St. Clare of Assisi has filed an application for the issuance
of the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. 94-02 as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic
Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the loth day of August, 1994, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by
the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on August 10, 1994, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 5 acres of land
located at the southeast corner of Highland and East Avenues, 6563 East
Avenue, known as the Ernst Mueller House.
b. The subject property consists of the historic Ernst
Mueller House, an abandoned citrus grove, several Eucalyptus windrows, and a
row of historic Magnolia trees.
C. The application contemplates the construction of a one-
story, temporary modular church building and related parking lot within and
surrounded by the existing citrus grove.
d. The alteration contemplated by the application is the
removal of a portion of an existing orange grove. No alterations to the
historic landmark house are proposed by this request.
HPC RESOLUTION NO.
LAP 94-02 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI CHURCH
August 10, 1994
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific
findings of facts set forth in Paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby
finds and concludes as follows:
a. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of
Ordinance No. 70; and
b. The action will not be detrimental to a structure or
feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering
interest or value of an historic nature; and
C. The proposed action is not in conflict with the
provisions of the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been
reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and a Negative Declaration was issued in conjunction with
Conditional Use Permit 94-07 on July 27, 1994.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application subject to the
following conditions:
1) Approval is granted for the removal of a
portion of the existing orange grove to
construct a modular church building and
related parking lot in accordance with
Conditional Use Permit 94-07 approved by the
Planning Commission. Replacement planting
shall be provided in kind on a one-for-one
basis to restore the grove. The applicant
shall submit a restoration plan and schedule
for the orange grove to the City Planner
prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits. The restoration plan shall be
prepared by a qualified consultant and
include an assessment of the health and
condition of the trees, replacement planting,
removal of dead or diseased trees,
irrigation, and long term maintenance.
2) All other mature trees on the site including,
but not limited to, the Magnolia trees along
East Avenue, Eucalyptus windrows, and two
palm trees shall be preserved in-place unless
their removal is approved through the
issuance of a Tree Removal Permit.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-04
LAP 94-02 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI CHURCH
August 10, 1994
Page 3
3) Any site work performed on the parcel, in
particular grading or trenching, shall be
performed under the supervision of an
archaeologist approved by the City for the
purposes of saving all valuable historic
artifacts which may be discovered during site
development.
6. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
HISTORIC P SERVATION COMMISSION OF, ,,,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry . MCNiel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST•
Br B er, ecre ary
I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the loth day of August 1994, by the
Following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 94-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 94-01 FOR THE KLUSMAN HOUSE,
LOCATED AT 8841 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA - APN: 207-211-13
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed
Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 207-211-13.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the
purposes of this Ordinance.
FACT: Inconspicuous in nature and blending in color to
the building, the proposed mechanical wheelchair lift
does not detract significantly from the historic and
architectural significance of the building.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA l
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth in Section II,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does approve Landmark Alteration Permit 94-01 for
alterations to the Klusman House as described in the Staff Report dated June
22, 1994, with the following conditions:
1) The main front door facing Foothill Boulevard and
all other exterior doors and windows shall be
repainted subject to the City Planner's review and
approval. Staff and the applicant shall work
together to determine a schedule for accomplishing
this.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-03
LAP 94-01 - KLUSMAN HOUSE
June 22, 1994
Page 2
2) The door which is to be widened shall be finished in
a manner consistent with the architecture and color
of the existing house.
3) An L-shaped, free standing stucco wall shall be
constructed on the north and east sides of the
lift. It shall not be attached to the house and
shall be 3-1/2 feet in height.
4) Prior to the issuance of building permits, staff
shall approve a landscape plan for the impacted
eastern side of the building to ensure that the
lift's impact on the exterior appearance of the
house is softened and reduced as much as possible.
AP OV HIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 1994.
HISTO C SE VATIO CO N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
E. Da rk r, Chairma
ATTEST:
Bra Bu r, ec tary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the 22nd day of June 1994, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-01 TO DESIGNATE THE
ERNST MUELLER FAMILY HOME, CITRUS GROVE, WINDROWS, AND
MAGNOLIA TREES, LOCATED AT 6563 EAST AVENUE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 227-071-17.
A. Recitals.
1. St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church has filed an application for a
Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application. "
2. On March 9, 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the city of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A, " of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 5 acres of land, basically a
square configuration, located at the southeast corner of Highland and East
Avenues.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed Landmark is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way
of life.
Fact: The Ernst Mueller family homesite reflects superbly the
early citricultural development of the Etiwanda area.
Finding: 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact: The Mueller and Stegmeier families played key roles in the
history of Etiwanda from the 1880s to the 1970s.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-02
LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME
March 9, 1994
Page 2
Finding: 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business
or use which was once common but is now rare.
Fact: The citrus industry's presence in this region, complete
with related grove houses and landscaping such as the Mueller
Home, was once very prominent and commonplace but has declined
severely over the past thirty years.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed
landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful
or unusual.
Fact: All the major characteristics of the Craftsman style of
architectural expression are present in the Mueller home and in
the level of detail of the building's design and construction.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Fact: The architectural styling, the grove, and the magnolia
trees lend a distinctive beauty to the area and the region.
Finding: 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community, or City.
Fact: For ninety years, the Mueller home and groves and related
magnolia trees along East Avenue have been an integral part of
the Etiwanda community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and determines it to be exempt per Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
9th day of March 1994, of Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-02
LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME
March 9, 1994
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994.
HISTORIC PRE TACOMMISSF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
. Da Bar an
ATTEST•
Brad ull s cretar
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of March 1994, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 94-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 93-02 FOR THE NORTON-
FISHER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - APN: 227-131-23
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all available comments on the proposed
Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all available input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 227-131-23.
SECTION II: The proposed demolition of a designated local landmark
constitutes a significant effect on a recognized historic resource per CEQA
Guidelines, Appendix G, Item J. Lacking the needed environmental
documentation, it is not possible to .either approve or deny the project until
an Environmental Impact Report is prepared.
SECTION III: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby deny without prejudice Landmark Alteration
Permit 93-02 for demolition of the Norton-Fisher House.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1994.
HISTO IC VATION COMMIS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ktA111 I
E. Da Bar ,r., Ch ' man
ATTEST:
Br ,r, Secr ary
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-01
LAP 93-02 - NORTON-FISHER HOUSE
February 9, 1994
Page 2
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation commission held on the 9th day of February 1994, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
RESOLUTION NO. 93-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION •OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
POINT OF INTEREST NO. 93-02 TO DESIGNATE THE C. N. ROSS HOUSE
SITE, LOCATED AT 6527 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AS AN HISTORIC POINT OF
INTEREST - APN: 227-051-03.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City has filed an application for an Historic Point of
Interest Designation as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic Point of Interest
Designation is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On July 14,. 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part "A, " of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 10 acres of land,
basically a square configuration, located at the southeast corner of Highland
and Etiwanda Avenues.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on July 14, 1993, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest is
particularly representative of an historic period, type,
style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The Charles N. Ross House stood as an
important reminder of the early citrus growing era of
Etiwanda's history.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-06
POI 93-02 - CITY OF R.C.
July 14, 1993
Page 2
Finding: 2. The proposed Point of Interest is an example
of a type of building which was once common but is now
rare.
Fact/s: As a grove house once surrounded by acres of
citrus trees, the Ross House represented one of a handful
Of such homes still in existence.
Finding: 3. The proposed Point of Interest was connected
with someone renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: Charles Rose came to Etiwanda early in its
settlement, arriving in 1883, only one year after the
Chaffey brothers established the colony. An active grower
in and promoter of the citrus industry, Ross owned several
10-acre parcels and was a key participant in the growth of
the community. His family and descendants continued to
live and work in the community into the 1950s.
Finding: 4. The proposed Point of Interest is connected
with a business or use which was once common but is now
rare.
Fact/s: The citrus industry played a critical role in
the formation and growth of the Etiwanda Community. The
industry's presence has declined dramatically in the past
forty years.
Finding: 5. The site is the location of an important
historic event or building.
Fact/s: For almost 90 years, the site contained the
home of the Charles N. Ross family, some of the earliest
settlers to the Etiwanda area. The house, once surrounded
by citrus groves, marked the northern entrance into the
historic core of the Etiwanda townsite.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project is considered
exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 per Article 19,
Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of
Historic Point of Interest Designation 93-02 on this 14th day of July 1993.
6. The Chairman of this commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-06
POI 93-02 - CITY OF R.C.
July 14, 1993
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 1993.
HISTORIC PRE ERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ^
Larry(; McNiel, Chairman
G
ATTEST:
Brad er, tary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of July 1993, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 93-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 93-01, DESIGNATING THE
CUCAMONGA LABOR CAMP SITE, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL AS A LOCAL HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-211-01, 18-21 , 31, 32,
AND 34.
A. Recitals.
(i) Fu Mai Limited Partnership has filed an application for Point of
Interest Designation 93-01, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is referred to
as "the application."
(ii) On May 11, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 24.56 acres of land,
basically a narrow, long rectangular configuration, located between Foothill
Boulevard and Arrow Route west of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on May 11 , 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1 . The proposed Point of Interest is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of
life.
Fact/s: The site in question housed Italian prisoners of war
providing their services in the agricultural productivity of the
area during the later stages of World War II, which was both
important and unique to the area.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-05
FU MAI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
May 11, 1993
Page 2
Finding: 2. The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: During World War II, the use of low-risk Italian prisoners
of war to aid in the productivity of local agricultural crops took
place in this area, as well as other parts of the southwest United
States. With development of the area, this agricultural activity
will likely never occur again.
Finding: 3. The site is the location of an important historic
event or building.
Fact/s: The site served as camp for 499 low-risk Italian prisoners
of war during the later stages of World War II. The site was used
for this purpose for approximately one year until the prisoners were
moved to nearby Camp Ono in San Bernardino. This use is unique to
the City.
4. Designation of a Historic Point of Interest is exempt from CEQA
(Article 19, Section 15308) .
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 ,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on this
11th day of May 1993, of Historic Point of Interest 93-01 with the following
mitigations:
a) Plaques or similar historical monuments per City Standards
shall be provided within Tentative Tract 15540 to adequately
mitigate the loss of any remains of the Prisoner of War Camp.
The design, text, and location shall be reviewed and approved
by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits (this
condition will be included in the Resolution of Approval for
Tentative Tract 15540) .
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 1993.
cnn
% Ma�rshaeek nks Cha' man
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS,"HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS - carried
RESOLUTION NO. 93-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVING OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-05 TO
DESIGNATE THE JOHN KLUSMAN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 8841
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-211-13.
A. Recitals.
(i) Gilbert Rodriquez Jr. has filed an application for Landmark
Designation 93-05, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation is referred to as the
"application."
(ii) On April 13, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted 'a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 2 acres of land, basically
a rectangular configuration, located on the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; Legal Description: Sub of Lot 10 Cucamonga
Vineyard TR PTN Lot 17 beg at a pt on W LI Vineyard Avenue which is 450 ft N
of S LI SD Lot 17 th W parallel with S LI SO Lot 568 ft th N parallel with E
LI SD Lot to S LI Foothill Boulevard th E alg SD S LI Foothill Boulevard to
its intersection with W LI Vineyard Avenue th S ALG SD W LI to POB EX St and
EX additional St per deed recorded May 12, 1981 #103853.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on April 13, 1993, including written and t
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section
2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes III
the following findings and facts:
Historic and Cultural Significance:
Finding: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-04
LD 93-05 - GILBERT RODRIQUEZ JR.
April 13, 1993
Page 2
Fact: The expansive growth of the Cucamonga area in the 1920s is well
represented in the home of one of its most prominent business leaders,
John Klusman. Strikingly located on Foothill Boulevard, the house stood
and stands as a reminder of the prestige of its owners, the growth boom
Southern California experienced in the 1920s, and the elegance that
existed amidst the vineyards and groves.
Finding: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned,
important, or a local personality.
Fact: John Klusman's impact on the development and growth of the area
remains noticeable today. With interests in viticulture, citrus
production, water management, banking, real estate, and civic leadership,
Klusman stands prominently in the annals of our local history.
Finding: The architect or builder was important.
Fact: Designed by Allison & Allison of Los Angeles, the Klusman House is
one of the few, if not the only, domestic structure to have the
distinction of such prominent designers.
Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the
proposed landmark are unusual or uniquely effective.
Fact: The combination of architectural styling, details, and materials
lend an impressive and well-integrated presence to the John Klusman home.
Finding: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact: With its coherency in style, design, and craftsmanship, the John
Klusman House represents a beautiful addition to the City's architectural
legacy.
Neighborhood and Geographic Setting
Finding: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood; and the proposed landmark in its location
represents an established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or City.
Fact: Since 1928, the John Klusman House has stood as an important
element of the community, City, and region.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and has been determined exempt per Article 19, Section 15308.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-04
LD 93-05 - GILBERT RODRIQUEZ JR.
April 13, 1993
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 ,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
13th day of April, 1993, of Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND/ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1993.
BY: ✓� :.�i�
Ma ha Meek Bankl-,_Cbalrpe son
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, HASKVITZ , SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, COOPER - carried
RESOLUTION NO. 93-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 93-01 FOR THE ETIWANDA
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, 7126 ETIWANDA AVENUE - APN: 227-
513-03.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed
all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically
finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at Assessor's
Parcel Number 227-513-03.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
Ordinance.
FACT: Low-lying and well-integrated to the lay of the building, the
proposed ramp does not detract significantly from the historic and
architectural significance of the building.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission
and based on the findings set forth in Section II;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 93-01
for alterations to the Etiwanda Congregational Church as described in the
staff report dated April 13, 1993, with the following conditions:
1 . Staff to review final plans prior to issuance of building permits.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-03
LAP 93-01 - ETIWANDA COMMUNITY CHURCH
April 13, 1993
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1993.
BY: A e e 4
q4j�rshaMeek Banl C irper on
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: "ARNER, BANKS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, COOPER - carried
RESOLUTION NO. 93-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 93-03 TO DESIGNATE THE
HOPPE HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6155 EAST AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK
- APN: 225-191-16.
A. Recitals. .
(i) Wayne and Vanessa Smith have filed an application for a Landmark
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On January 12, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately one-half acre of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located at 6155 East Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on January 12, 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of
an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The turn-of-the-century realities of the family-based,
rural, agricultural lifestyle in the Etiwanda community are
exemplified in the Hoppe House. Near to their acres of lemon,
orange, and apricot groves, the home was removed geographically from
the core of the Etiwanda town, but connected in many ways through
economic, social, cultural, educational, and religious ties.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-02
LD 93-03 - SMITH
January 12, 1993
Page 2
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed
Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common
but is now rare.
Facts: The number of grove houses, while never multitudinous, had
decidedly shrunk as residential development has replaced
agricultural production. Still relatively rural, the present-day
setting of Hoppe House continues to reflect the Etiwanda of 50 and
100 years ago.
Finding 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone
renowned, important, or local personality.
Facts: The Hoppe family, while never necessarily famous, were an
important and long-lived thread in the community fabric of
Etiwanda. For almost 100 years, the family contributed to the
social and economic history of the town.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Facts: The Hoppe House stands as a lasting reminder to the
architectural styles of the agricultural communities of Southern
California, circa 1915, and to the development of the Etiwanda
community. It is an elegant yet functional element of the area's
built environment.
Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community or city.
Facts: For the past 81 years, the Hoppe House has stood as a
testament to the early history of the community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 ,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of
Landmark Application 93-03 on this 12th day of January 1993.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-02
LD 93-03 - SMITH
January 12, 1993
page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993•
Ma ha Meek Bank C airma
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER
RESOLUTION NO. 93-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 93-01 TO DESIGNATE THE
EMORY ALLEN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9441 LOMITA DRIVE, AS A
LANDMARK - APN: 202-082-13
A. Recitals.
(i) Jan Sutton and Dale Sutton have filed an application for a
Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On January 12, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately one-quarter acre of land,
basically a square configuration, located at the southwest corner of Layton
Court and Lomita Drive.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on January 12, 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of
an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Facts: The Emory Allen home exemplifies the architecturally simple
lines and craftsmanship of the region's vernacular housing stock
from the 1930s. In the context of the growing Alta Loma community,
Emory Allen's handiwork, diligence, and craftsmanship (including the
making of his own bricks) in building a home for his family, serve
as fine examples of the sense of community and family spirit of the
community.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 93-01
LD 93-01 - SUTTON
January 12, 1993
Page 2
Finding 2: The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renowned, important, or a local personality.
Facts: Emory Allen served a critical role in the young agricultural
communities of Alta Loma and Cucamonga as Zanjero for the Cucamonga
Water Company, managing water for irrigation and consumption. He
was also a well-recognized mechanic and builder, having the
reputation of a consummate handyman and craftsman.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community or city.
Facts: For almost sixty years, the Emory Allen house has stood at
the corner of Layton Court and Lomita Street as an integral part of
the physical fabric of the historic Alta Loma community.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
-1970.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,
2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
12th day of January 1993, of Landmark Designation 93-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993.
Marsha Meer, anks, tfia rman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER
RESOLUTION NO. 92-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 92-01 , DESIGNATING THE
H. W. MINOR RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 10304 19TH STREET, AS A
LOCAL HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-141-01.
A. Recitals.
(i) Hix Development has filed an application for a Point of Interest
Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On December 8, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately .74 acres of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of 19th
Street and Mayberry Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on December 8, 1992, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or
way of life.
Fact/s: The house in question serves as an example of the
single-story bungalow architectural style use commonly in the
area during the 1920s and 1930s.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-05
POI 92-01 - H. W. MINOR RESIDENCE
December 8, 1992
Page 2
Finding: 2. The proposed Point of Interest was connected with
someone renowned, important, or a local personality.
Fact/s: The residence was constructed and occupied by Wilbur
Minor, who provided butcher services for residents primarily in
the Alta Loma area of the City.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding: 1 . The proposed Point of Interest, in its location,
represents an established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: Residents of the City have been traveling to and from
this site for almost 50 years to purchase commodities associated
with the egg ranch store.
4. Designation of a Historic Point of Interest is exempt from CEQA
(Article 19, Section 15308) .
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,
2, 3, 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter 2.24
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on this 8th day of
December 1992, of Historic Point of Interest No. 92-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1992.
Marsh . Meek B ks C ai MY
n
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, 'COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT,
TESSIER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 92-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 92-02 TO DESIGNATE THE
PEARSON/STEVENS FILLING STATION AND GARAGE, LOCATED AT 12912
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORICAL LANDMARK - APN: 1100-
061-02
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Landmark
Designation No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On August 25, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 2 acres of land, basically a
rectangular configuration, located at 12912 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on August 25, 1992, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact: Representing both the Etiwanda citrus community and the
importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the
structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and mass
western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and
often a helping hand, the station and its owners were an
important part of the local area.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-04
LD 92-02 - PEARSON FILLING STATION
August 25, 1992
Page 2
Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare. The proposed
landmark is connected with a business or use which was once
common but is now rare.
Fact: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the
automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes,
including the Etiwanda area. Most of these roadside stations
and garages have fallen out of use or been abandoned or
demolished. With their loss, physical reminders of the everyday
patterns that characterized community life sixty years ago are
fading.
Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of
its kind.
Fact: Opening shortly after the completion of Route 66 in 1926,
the Pearson Filling Station and Garage is one of the oldest such
structures extant.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renown or important or a local personality.
Fact: The Pearson family was and is deeply connected with the
cultural and familial fabric of Etiwanda history.
Finding 5: The builder or architect was important.
Fact: Builder Henry Klusman was one of the more talented,
competent, and significant local builders to mark the pages of
this area's history books.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods
used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or
uniquely effective.
Fact: The reserved, vernacular expression of the very popular
Spanish Revival architectural style demonstrates local interest
in broader stylistic trends.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 1 : The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Fact: At the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue
intersection, the station is the only remaining link to an
important element of local history and to an epoch of our
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-04
LD 92-02 - PEARSON FILLING STATION
August 25, 1992
Page 3
national experience. Without it, all physical traces of that
portion of Route 66 will be lost.
Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents
an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community, or city.
Fact: For over 65 years, the Pearson Filling Station and Garage
has been a community resource and its owners, the Pearsons,
Stevens, and Myers to name a few, added to the communal
experience of the Etiwanda area.
4. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on August 25, 1992, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section
2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to the
Commission policy regarding landmark designation over an owner's objection,
this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. It is the policy of the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to override the objection of an owner
in recommending landmark designation when:
Finding 1: The property is on the City's Historical Inventory.
Fact: Staff has reviewed the structure and listed it as a
Potential Local Landmark (PLL) , Potential State Landmark (PSL) ,
and Potential Listing on the National Register of Historic
Places (PNR) .
Finding 2: The property stands out as having outstanding
historical, architectural, cultural, and/or aesthetic
significance.
Fact: The important place of the citrus industry to our local
area and, on a broader scale, of Route 66 and the westward
migration in the 1930s, are evidenced by this modest,
architecturally-intact community resource.
Finding 3: Designation could help protect it.
Fact: As a local landmark, any subsequent alterations,
including demolition, would have to be reviewed fully by the
Commission.
5. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, and this designation is exempt from CEQA under Article 19, Section
15380.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-04
LD 92-02 - PEARSON FILLING STATION
August 25, 1992
Page 4
6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 , 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to
Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
25th day of August 1992, of this Landmark Designation application.
7. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992.
By: '. I - )el A.'6 -- I - -.-
Narsha Meek Ban , airma
AYES: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 92-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 92-01 TO DESIGNATE THE
CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOL (SWEETEN HALL) , LOCATED AT 9324 SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD, AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-111-09.
A. Recitals.
(i) The Cucamonga Service Club and the City of Rancho Cucamonga have
filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject is referred to as
"the application."
(ii) On the 6th day of August 1992, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 219 acres of land,
basically a square configuration, located at 9324 San Bernardino Road.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced hearing on August 6, 1992, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section
2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes
the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1) The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of
life.
f
Fact: Few public buildings remain to remind us of life in
Cucamonga circa 1915, and even fewer schools survived
intact.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-03
LD 92-01 - CENTRAL SCHOOL
August 6, 1992
Page 2
Finding: 2) The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of
its kind.
Fact: The structure may be the oldest, unaltered school in the
City.
Finding: 3) The site is the location of an important historic
event or building.
Fact: Since the first school in Cucamonga was built on this site
in. the early 1890's, its significance lies both above and
below ground.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding: 1) The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact: Children have been traveling to and from this site for
close to 100 years; service groups and many other clubs
have spent countless hours working together in a spirit of
community outreach and cohesiveness throughout the
majority of this century, and as such, the structure
stands as a living, lasting reminder of the area's
heritage.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of
Landmark Application LD 92-01 on this 6th day of August 1992.
5. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992.
BY: Ajut,�qx-�
Marsha Meek-Ranks, Chair n
c.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT',VTESSIER ,,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVIT2
RESOLUTION NO. 92-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL A CHANGE IN THE DAY AND HOUR FOR THE
REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated a 4/10 work program for
City staff at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the Commission believes moving the day and time of their regularly
scheduled meetings will provide for a more effective and timely review.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1 : Regular meetings for the Historic Preservation Commission shall be
held in the Council Chamber at the Civic Center complex, located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, and said regular meeting shall occur
as follows:
a. The second Tuesday of each month, starting at 5:00 p.m. unless otherwise
determined by the Commission.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of August 1992.
BY: A r",. I- 14�" - J L I
Marsha Meek anks, Cha'rman
AYES: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 92-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 90-OSR FOR THE CROSWELL
HOUSE, 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY - APN: 208-311-03, 04, 21, AND
24.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all previous conditions of Historic Preservation Commission
Resolution No. 90-05 shall apply to this project.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 208-311-03, 04, 21, and 24.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2.24. 120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes
of this Ordinance.
FACT: The proposed alterations do not pose a threat to the
historic integrity of the building. The desired changes will
maintain the historic character of the structure through
similar architectural/design treatments characteristic of the
era of original construction.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural,
architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic
nature.
FACT: The south elevation will not be altered as part of this
application. Modifications to the north and east elevations
consist of window relocations. Existing windows will be re-
used where possible or windows that match in material, design,
and scale will be used as replacements. The extension of the
west elevation and the fireplace/chimney construction will
match the existing materials and color.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 92-01
LAP 90-05R - CROSWELL HOUSE
May 7, 1992
Page 2
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth in Section II;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-05R
for alterations to the Croswell House as described in the staff report dated
May 7, 1992, with the following conditions:
1 . The plaster treatment on the addition area and on window
patches shall match the existing plaster treatment. A
test panel shall be prepared for Historic Preservation
staff's review and approval prior to commencement of the
work.
2. Existing windows shall be relocated/re-used where
possible.
3. All new windows shall match the existing windows in
material, design, and scale. The specifications shall be
reviewed and approved by Historic Preservation staff prior
to building permit issuance.
4. Wood trim shall be provided below all new windows to match
existing conditions. Details shall be reviewed and
approved by the Historic Preservation staff prior to
building permit issuance.
5. The exterior of the house shall be repainted to match the
existing color. The color shall be verified by Historic
Preservation staff prior to building permit issuance.
6. The alterations and restoration shall be completed prior
to release of occupancy for any new condominium unit.
7. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if building permits are not
issued within twenty-four (24) months from the date of
approval.
.APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF MAY 1992.
BY: Gsua�I�i r
Marsha Banks, a airper on
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVIT2, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
i
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, PRESTON
RESOLUTION NO. 91-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 91-03 FOR THE ALTA LOMA
FIRE HALL, 9493 LOMITA DRIVE AND 7125 AMETHYST STREET -
APN: 202-083-05.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission held a duly advertised
public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 202-083-05.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2.24. 120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes
of this Ordinance.
FACT: The proposed alterations do not pose a great threat to
the historic integrity of the structure. The desired changes
will remodel a portion of the building that has previously
undergone insensitive alterations and thus will bring the
structure closer to its original use.
FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural,
architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic
nature.
FACT: On its northern elevation, the structure's historic and
structural elements have previously been diminished. This
remodeling will partially but not completely restore that
portion of the Fire Hall.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this `
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
I
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-06
LAP 91-03 - EDWARD CAPPARELLI
December 5, 1991
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 91-03
for alterations to the Alta Loma Fire Hall as described in the December 5,
1991, Staff Report, with the following conditions:
I. Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the Project
Description included in this report. Historic Preservation
staff shall review and approve final building plans prior to
issuance of building permits.
2. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if building permits are not issued
within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval.
3. The Historic Building Code shall apply to this project if the
.Building Official concurs.
4. All material samples (paint colors, stucco treatment, door and
window specifications, etc. ) shall be submitted to the Historic
Preservation staff prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. The applicant will allow staff to inspect the structure after
the -removal of the vertical siding to determine the extent to
which. the original framing exists. Staff will at that time
decide if there remains enough historic fabric to require the
restoration of that portion of the Fire Hall. At the very
least, framing for the new openings will avoid unnecessary
' demolition or damage to the remaining framing, if any, that
remains from the original construction.
6. The applicant will explore the installation of two 36-inch half-
timbered doors as an alternative to the proposed doors. He
shall then consult with Historic Preservation staff to determine
the final appearance of that opening. Staff shall approve this
final configuration and design prior to the issuance of building
permits.
7. The balcony railing along the east side of the structure shall
be reconstructed to match the original design and will be
approved by staff as part of this Landmark Alteration Permit.
APPROVE
D AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1991.
BY: JIZ7�1z�
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ .
RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST 91-02 DESIGNATING THE
LAFOURCADE STORE, LOCATED AT 11871 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS
A POINT OF INTEREST AND CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE -
APN: 229-011-10.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City has filed an application for a Point of Interest as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Point of Interest is referred to as the "application."
(ii) On September 5, 1991, the Historic Preservation Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said .hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately one acre of land, basically a
rectangular configuration, located on the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester (Orange) Avenue intersection.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 5, 1991, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant
to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to
the Historic Preservation Commission policy regarding landmark designation
over an owner's objection, this Commission hereby makes the following findings
and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest was connected with
someone renowned, important, or a local personality.
Fact/s: John B. LaFourcade established an advanced and
elaborate winemaking and grape-handling business in an
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
POI 91-02 - LaFOURCADE STORE
September 5, 1991
Page 2
era marked by failed attempts at such endeavors in the
Rochester/Cucamonga area. Seemingly well known
throughout the County, LaFourcade represents an
important epoch and entrepreneurial spirit of this
valley.
Finding: 2. The architect or builder was important.
Fact/s: In choosing J. N. Johnson to design and construct his
winery complex, LaFourcade was one of few local
property owners in the late teens-early 1920s to
employ a contractor who was very well known in the
County. Johnson constructed many large and impressive
public and private buildings in San Bernardino,
Redlands, and Colton. E
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Finding: 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used
in the proposed Point of Interest are unusual or
significant or uniquely effective.
Fact/s: Although it has been altered, the main entrance of the
building which is marked by a parapet and flanked with
Corinthian pilasters, remains as a testament to a
design palette created by LaFourcade and Johnson which
was unique to this area.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding: 1 . The proposed Point of Interest in its location
represents an established and familiar visual feature
of the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact/s: As a gas station, store, and restaurant, the subject
structure stands as a 70-year-old notable fixture in
the community's landscape.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970. If properly mitigated, the requested demolition of the. LaFourcade Store
would not require further environmental review and a mitigated Negative
Declaration will be issued for such demolition.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves, on the 5th day of
September 1991, Point of Interest 91-02 for the LaFourcade Store. The
Commission further adopts the following Conditions of Approval mitigating the
requested demolition:
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
POI 91-02 - LaFOURCADE STORE
September 5, 1991
Page 3
1) No demolition permits shall be issued for the existing structures
prior to the property owner's written acknowledgment and
acceptance of. the Cultural Resource Mitigation Measures per the
mitigated Negative Declaration.
2) The development of the site shall incorporate details of the
site's history, in particular the LaFourcade period, through the
incorporation of the following measures: commissioned public art
and development and placement of interpretive public displays.
The final specifications of such measures shall be reviewed by the
Historic Preservation Commission and forwarded with a
recommendation to the Planning Commission during
development/design review hearings on any development proposal for
this site. Final approval of the appropriate public art and
interpretive displays shall occur prior to the issuance of
building permits.
3) The decorative parapet at the northeast corner of the building
dating from the LaFourcade period shall be removed during
demolition and be examined by a structural engineering consultant
hired by the owner and approved by the City Planner to determine
the possibility of its reuse. City staff shall be present during
this demolition to inspect the parapet. If after examination
restoration proves feasible, the parapet element shall be
considered for incorporation into the above public art or
interpretive exhibit. If the reuse of this element is not
feasible, it shall be documented per HABS/HAER standards, the
final form of which shall be approved by the City Planner.
4) The developer shall contribute $10,000 to the Chaffey-Garcia House
Barn project, which will be used to develop a museum/cultural
center depicting and exhibiting the agricultural heritage of the
area. The City Council may, upon the input of the Historic
Preservation Commission, allocate these funds to another similar
type of preservation project, including but not necessarily
limited to, the Historic Preservation Site and Land-Banking Fund,
depending upon the timing of the compliance with this
mitigation. This contribution shall be provided prior to the
issuance of building permits of any phase of the Masi Commerce
Center.
5) The site developer shall sponsor four Oral History interviews of
individuals knowledgeable of the LaFourcade/Masi era of
significance. These interviews, which shall not exceed a cost of
$5,000, shall be conducted by a consultant approved by City staff.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
POI 91-02 - LaFOURCADE STORE
September 5, 1991
Page 4
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5Th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991 .
BY: (2z:�� Jdz;n�'
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, HASKVITZ
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 91-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 91-01, THE G.P. LEDIG
HOUSE, LOCATED AT 5702 AMETHYST AVENUE - APN: 1062-071-
08.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Alteration.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby-_
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the modifications as indicated
by the staff report dated June 6, 1991, with the structure and property
located at Assessor's Parcel No 1062-071-08.
SECTION II: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above referenced public hearing on June 6, 1991 ,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds:
Finding: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of
Section 2.24. 120 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance.
Fact: In order to preserve the G.P. Ledig House, it must be
relocated. This action will continue to promote and enhance the City's
cultural resources. Keeping the home as a residence maintains its historic
use and extends a greater chance of long-term protection for the structure.
Finding: The proposed use will not be detrimental to a structure
or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural or engineering
interest, or value of a historic nature.
Fact: Beyond necessary demolition for relocation, the proposed
alterations retain and promote the home's historic qualities.
SECTION III: This Landmark Alteration Permit is except from CEQA
(Article 1, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewe.i
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above;
HPC RESOLUTION 91-04
LAP 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 6, 1991
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 91-01,
the G.P. Ledig House, as described in the June 6, 1991 staff report, with the
following conditions:
1 . Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with
the plans and specifications provided within the
staff report dated June 6, 1991.
2. This approval shall expire, unless extended by
the Historic Preservation Commission, if
modifications as . , indicated have not been
completed within 24 months from the date of
approval.
3. Detailed plans 'for the approved modifications to
the site and structure, including fencing and
architectural revisions, shall be submitted to
the Historic Preservation Commission staff for
their review and approval prior to issuance of
any permits for said home.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF JUNE 1991.
BY:
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 91-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK 91-02 TO DESIGNATE THE NOSENZO/SMIDERLE
HOUSE, LOCATED AT 8068 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK -
APN: 208-153-01 .
A. Recitals.
(i) Misters Jim Hawn and Bill Taylor have filed an application
for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On April 4, 1991, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. The application applies to the main habitable structure on
the approximately 0.24 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration,
located at 8068 Archibald Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on April 4, 1991 , including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to
Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact: As one of a few remaining structures composing the early
Cucamonga Town Center, the Nosenzo/Smiderle house remains a critical
link to understanding the historic composition of the area.
Finding: 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare. The proposed
landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-03
LD 91-02 - NOSENZO/SMIDERLE HOUSE
April 4, 1991
Page 2
Fact: Early building in the Cucamonga townsite was spurred by the
availability of pre-cut lumber via railroad and influenced by the
prevailing agricultural imagery of the Victorian era. Although many
residential and commercial structures existed in the town center at
1900 only a few remain.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding: 3. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood. The proposed landmark in its
location represents an established and familiar visual feature of
the neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact& The Nosenzo/Smiderle house is one of the few remnants of the
citrus downtown in Cucamonga and it has retained many of its
distinguishing architectural features.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been
reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant
to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends
approval on the 4th day of April 1991, of Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL 1991 .
BY:
Bob Schmi t, hairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 91-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK 91-01 TO DESIGNATE THE MAGIC LAMP RESTAURANT
(FORMERLY LUCY AND JOHN'S CAFE) , LOCATED AT 8189 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 207-113-12 THROUGH .
18.
A. Recitals.
(i) Anthony Vernola and the City of Rancho Cucamonga have filed an
application for an Historic Landmark as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic Landmark is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On March 7, 1991, and continued to April 4, 1991 , the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed
public hearings on the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites • prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.56 acres of land, in
a rectangular configuration, located at 8189 Foothill Boulevard, and all
structures including signs, brick walls, and brick paving.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings on March 7 and April 4, 1991 ,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and
pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or
way of life.
Fact: For close to fifty years, a restaurant has operated on
this site, representing the importance of Route 66 related
business. Since its beginnings as a Streamline Moderne-styled
cafe in the early 1940s, and its conversion to a thematic
showpiece in 1956, a unique sense of commercial enterprise has
characterized this site.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-02
LD 91-01 - MAGIC LAMP RESTAURANT
April 4, 1991
Page 2
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance.
Finding: 1. The construction materials or engineering methods ,
used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or
uniquely effective.
Fact: The range of the carefully-crafted detailing on the
Magic Lamp's exterior represents unique and creative efforts.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Fact: Singled out for special attention in the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, the Magic Lamp plays a decisive -role
in establishing the outstanding design attributes of the Bear
Gulch area.
Finding: 2. The proposed landmark, in its location,
represents an established .and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or city.
Fact.: The Magic Lamp sits prominently on Foothill Boulevard
and serves as an important architectural and business element
to the City.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed .
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
4th day of April 1991, of Landmark Designation 91-01.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.'
APPROVED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL 1991 .
BY: Yoe
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 91-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST 91-01 TO
DESIGNATE THE CAMPANELLA, GUIDERA, AND DICARLO HOMES AND
VINEYARDS , LOCATED AT 12573, 12601, 12617, 12675, 12705,
12743, 12777, 12801, 12807, 12811, 12821, AND 12881
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST -
APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13.
A. Recitals.
(i ) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a
Point of Interest designation as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is referred to
as "the application."
(ii ) On December 6, 1990 and January 3, 1991, the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed
public hearings on the application.
(iii ) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B . Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part "A" , of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 62 acres of land,
basically a rectangular configuration, located along the south side of
Foothill Boulevard east of Interstate 15 and west of Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings on December 6, 1990 and January 3,
1991 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1 : The proposed Point of Interest is particularly
representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of
life.
Fact: The DiCarlo, Schiro, Campanella, Ellena, Columbaro, and
Guidera families forged a community based on shared cultural
background, faith, and way of existence. These women, men, and
children pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-01
POI 91-01 - Campanella, Guidera, DiCarlo Homes
January 3, 1991
Page 2
of wine in the eastern Cucamonga/southern Etiwanda region in the
1920s and 1930s. The homes and winery buildings stand as reminders
of the thriving family-based viniculture once so prevalent in this
area. The Orchard/Meier filling station is linked historically with
the small retail wineries and homes it lies next to through the most
popular thoroughfare of the time, Route 66. The rise of automobile
travel gave way to the parallel development of roadside diners, gas
stations, and repair shops. At one time, this structure filled all
of these needs for travellers as well as those of the growing
community of Etiwanda.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare.
Fact: The two houses remain as testaments to the Craftsman style as
it was interpreted in the area during the 1920s. Such examples are
increasingly rare. Estimated construction of the filling station
dates to the late 1910s.
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is now rare.
Fact: Wineries, large and modest, composed a thriving majority of
the Cucamonga/Etiwanda area' s businesses and land uses in the era
from 1915-1950. These once extensive agricultural enterprises are
rapidly disappearing from the landscape. Furthermore, roadside
filling stations/restaurants are now all but obsolete.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Finding 1 : The proposed Point of Interest materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
Facts : These buildings form a large part of the overall sense of
place and past in the area.
Finding 2 : The proposed Point of Interest in its location represents
an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood,
community, or city.
Fact: Owned by pioneer families whose descendants have stayed in the
community, the home, winery, and filling station have long been an
established and viable element in the area.
Finding 3: The properties are on the City' s historical inventory.
Fact/s: The properties are listed thus.
Finding 4: The properties stand out as having outstanding
historical , architectural , cultural , or aesthetic significance.
Fact/s: The area' s disruption as caused by the widening of Foothill
Boulevard, the construction of Interstate 15, and the increasing
obsolescence of agricultural uses in the region has reduced
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-01
POI 91-01 - Campanella, Guidera, DiCarlo Homes
January 3, 1991
Page 3
significantly the context of these structures. Since the proposed
project calls out for the demolition of all of the remaining
buildings and the developer expressed initial objection to any
retention or landmarking of the structures, the matter of overriding
significance must be determined. Thus, this Point of Interest .
Resolution with mitigations recognized the great historical value of
the area as a unit and not specific structures.
Finding 5: Designation could help protect it.
Fact/s: Regardless of the review process called into play by
oFi ectidn, the proposed Foothill Marketplace would impact greatly an
historic site with strong cultural and ethnic significance. Thus,
per CEQA, the project would have some negative environmental
effects. These effects can be ameliorated by the acceptance of the
mitigations outlined in Paragraph 4 of this Resolution.
4. This Commission hereby finds that this designation for Historic
Point of Interest has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and has been determined to be
categorically exempt and further, this Commission hereby recommends that the
following mitigations be included with the environmental review and
determinations for the overall Foothill Marketplace project:
1) The project owners shall sponsor a City-administered Oral
History Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the
subject area.
2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according
to HABS/HAER Standards by an architect approved by the City.
3) The project owners shall donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes
and pay for their relocation to persons demonstrating
ownership of a parcel of land within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and suitable for such a relocation. These homes
shall be available for such donation over a period of 180
days. Such parcels located in the historic community of
Etiwanda will be given first preference.
4) The project owners shall utilize personal names and those of
associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels,
on the project site whenever possible.
5) The developer shall incorporate the familial and agricultural
past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the
architectural design of the project. This artwork shall
portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic
style and the project owner will submit no less than three
alternatives in no less than three different artistic mediums
for the Historic Preservation Commission 's review. The final
specifications for this architecturally-integrated artwork
shall be approved by the Planning Commission.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 91-01
POI 91-01 - Campanella, Guidera, DiCarlo Homes
January 3, 1991
Page 4
6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures
within the project site until the issuance of building
permits for any new structures.
7) The project owner shall contribute up to $100,000 to
establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000 square
foot barn at the site of the City-owned Chaffey/Garcia house
wherein local wine industry artifacts will be documented and
displayed. The said funds shall be donated prior to the
issuance of demolition permits. The design of the said
structure shall follow the design of the original
Chaffey/Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Historic Preservation Commission
in the form of a Landmark Alteration Permit.
5 . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
3rd day of January, 1991, of Point of Interest Designation 91-01..
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1991.
0
BY:
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS : ARNER, BANKS , BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : COOPER
RESOLUTION NO. 90-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 89-05R FOR THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY
HOUSE, 9686 HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
91701 - APN: 1061-561-03
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Landmark
Alteration Permit 89-05 on December 7 , 1989.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit revisions .
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I : The application applies to the house located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 1061-561-03.
SECTION II : The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2 .24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FACT: The action proposed is consistent with the
purposes of this Resolution.
FINDING: The applicant has submitted sufficient
specifications regarding the proposed work 's scope per
Section 2 .24.120 requirements.
FACT: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural ,
architectural , or engineering interest or value of an
historic nature.
FINDING: The proposed alterations acknowledge the design
qualities and craftsmanship of the outstanding original
details without harming any such earlier features. The
alterations also enhance the value of the building as a
livable space.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-10
LAP 89-05R - DEMENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE
October 4 , 1990
Page 2
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 89-05R
for alterations to the Demens-Tolstoy House as described in the October 4,
1990 Staff Report, with the following conditions:
1 . The body and conditions of Historic Preservation Commission
Resolution No. 89-04 shall be adhered to in their entirety.
2 . Staff shall approve final alteration plans, prior to issuance of
building permits.
3 . Staff shall approve the window, door, and stairway
specifications for the new porch, prior to issuance of building
permits .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990.
BY:
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON,
SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 90-06 FOR ROTH'S STORE AND
POST OFFICE, 7157 AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA - APN: 202-151-01
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application applies to the building located at
Assessor's Parcel Number 202-151-01 .
SECTION II : The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
FACT: The action proposed is consistent with the
purposes of this Resolution.
FINDING: The proposed alterations pose no threat to the
historical integrity of the structure. Rather, the
desired changes will restore the building close to its
original look. The building needs attention and
rehabilitation which the proposed alterations will
provide.
FACT: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural ,
architectural , or engineering interest or value of an
historic nature.
FINDING: The outstanding structural , aesthetic , and
historical elements will be preserved and enhanced by the
proposed changes.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-09
LAP 90-06 - ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE
October 4, 1990
Page 2
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-06
for alterations to the Roth 's Store and Post Office as described in the
October 4, 1990 Staff Report, with the following conditions:
1 . Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the Project
Description included in this report. Historic preservation
staff shall review and approve final building plans prior to
issuance of building permits .
2. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if building permits are not issued
within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval .
3. The Historic Building Code shall apply to this project.
4. Any material samples (paint colors, awning type and color, etc.)
shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation staff prior to
the issuance of building permits.
5 . If the existing bathroom and its effect on the most southern
storefront windows remains an issue, staff will review and
approve the final treatment, prior to the issuance of tenant
improvement permits .
6. Every effort should be made to restore the storefront windows as
carefully as possible and by following the guidelines forwarded
in the Secretary of Interior's Preservation Brief 9: The Repair
of Historic Wooden Windows (Exhibit "3") .
7 . Staff will approve the final exterior paint color prior to the
issuance of building permits.
APPROVE OPTED THIS H D Y OF OCTOBER 1990
L&v—e
BY:
4�,, nziyl-
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON,
SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK 90-04 TO DESIGNATE ROTH'S STORE AND POST
OFFICE LOCATED AT 7157 AMETHYST AVENUE AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK
- APN: 202-151-01 .
A. Recitals .
(i) Edward Capparelli has filed an application for a Landmark as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application ."
(ii) On October 4, 1990, the Historic Preservation Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2 . The application applies to approximately 0.7 acres of land,
basically a triangular configuration, located at 7157 Amethyst Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on October 4, 1990, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant
to Section 2 .24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission
hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a . Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding: 1 . The proposed landmark is particularly
representative of an historic period, type, style, region,
or way of life.
Facts: After the completion of the Pacific Electric
Railway and the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House in
1914, the Roth family's store and post office served the
new downtown area of Alta Loma. A modest and utilitarian
structure, it serves as a reminder of the commitment and
hardwork which individuals invested in the growing but
small citrus-producing area.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-08
LD 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE & POST OFFICE
October 4, 1990
Page 2
Finding: 2 . The proposed landmark is of greater age than
most of its kind .
Facts: The Roth Store and Post Office is one of the oldest
existing structures of its type and original use.
b. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting .
Finding: 1 . The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood .
Facts: Although a few significant structures have been
lost, the core of Old Alta Loma remains and this building
is critical to the historic nature of the neighborhood.
Finding: 2 . The proposed landmark in its location
represents an established and familiar visual feature of
the neighborhood, community or city.
Facts: Existing for 75 years, the Roth Store and Post
Office, later the beer hall Ernie 's Place, has been a
prominent feature of the Old Alta Loma downtown. Its
proximity to the railroad tracts and to the c .1913 packing
house, due south and east respectively, make the structure
an important visual landmark.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970.
5 . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 , 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter
2 .24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
4th day of October 1990 of Landmark Application.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990.
BY: Y �
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON
•SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 90-05, THE CROSWELL HOUSE
CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - APN: 208-311-03, 04, 21 AND 24.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application approval applies to the construction of
36 condominium units and the preservation in place of the Croswell House at
9874 Arrow Highway and physical alterations related thereto, and as
conditioned herein by this Resolution.
SECTION II : The proposed Landmark Alteration is approved based upon
the following findings of fact :
a. The proposed action is consistent with the purpose of Chapter
2.24 of the City Municipal Code; and,
b. The proposed action will not be detrimental to the structure
from a significant aesthetic, cultural , architectural , or engineering interest
or value of an historic nature; and,
C. The action proposed is necessary to ensure the continued and
consistent maintenance and condition of the residence.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 90-0,7
LAP 90-05 - CROSWELL HOUSE
May 3, 1990
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-05,
the Croswell House, as described in the May 3, 1990 Staff Report with the
following conditions:
1 . Prior to the approval of permits to rehabilitate or alter the
Croswell House, beyond the scope of work proposed with this
application, detailed plans shall be submitted to, and approved
by, the Historic Preservation Commission.
2 . This approval shall expire unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the conditions of approval as
indicated have not been completed within 24 months from the date
of approval .
3 . A 15-foot deep rear yard shall be provided by amending the site
plan and the rear yard shall be defined by a hedge.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF MAY, 1990.
BY: ,
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ,
PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES.: COMMISSIONERS : NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : NONE
RESOLUTION NO. F90=0$------�
' - - -'
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT THE MOVE TO PRESERVE THE UNITED
STATES ROUTE 66 AS AN HISTORIC HIGHWAY.
WHEREAS, the United States Route 66, a 2,000 mile highway from
Chicago, Illinois, to Santa Monica, California, has played a major role in the
20th Century history of our Country; and,
WHEREAS, Route 66 has become a symbol of the American peoples
heritage of travel and their legacy of seeking a better life; and,
WHEREAS, Route 66 served as a funnel for the 20th Century migration
from the Dust Bowl of the Central States; and,
WHEREAS, Route 66 has been memorialized in such books as The Grapes
of Wrath, songs, motion pictures, television programs, and has become an
accepted part of the American culture; and,
WHEREAS, during the early 1980's, structures and features along Route
66 began to disappear, an historical loss to the nation ; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan which was specifically designed to acknowledge and promote the
preservation of historic features of Foothill Boulevard, also known as Route
66.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga takes this opportunity to recommend
to the City Council the approval of an appropriate resolution to encourage
that Route 66 be commemorated as a nationally significant highway, that was
one of the longest and earliest transcontinental roadways in America, and that
Route 66 be preserved as an historic highway.
APPROVE D ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.
B Y: (,�✓��
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS : ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. gO-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 90-02, THE LEDIG HOUSE,
CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 5702 AMETHYST STREET.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed landmark
alteration permit.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said landmark alteration permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application approval applies to the moving of the
existing Ledig House from 5702 Amethyst Street to a site east of the Rancho
Cucamonga Neighborhood Center and physical alterations related thereto, and as
conditioned herein by this resolution.
SECTION II : The proposed landmark alteration is approved based upon
the following findings of fact:
a. The proposed action is consistent with the purpose of Chapter
2.24 of the City Municipal Code; and,
b. The proposed action will not be detrimental to the structure
from a significant aesthetic, cultural , architectural , or engineering interest
or value of an historic nature; and,
C. The action proposed is necessary to ensure the continued and
consistent maintenance and condition of the residence.
SECTION III : This landmark alteration permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-02,
the Ledig House, as described in the April 5, 1990 staff report, with the
following conditions:
HPC RESOLUTION NO. -90-05
LA 90-02 - LEDIG HOUSE
April 5, 1990
Page 2
1 . Prior to the approval of permits to rehabilitate and alter the
existing structure by installing it at its new location, detailed plans shall
be submitted to and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission.
2. This approval shall expire unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the conditions of approval as indicated have not
been completed within 24 months from the date of approval .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.
BY.
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS. COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES : COMMISSIONERS : NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 90-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 90-03, THE THOMAS WINERY
AND DISTILLERY BUILDINGS, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - APN:
208-101-10 & 11
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application applies to the plans and specifications
submitted with regards to the Thomas Winery Building and Distillery Building
located on APN: 208-101-10 & II .
SECTION II : Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts
established within the applicable Staff Report, this Commission hereby
establishes the following facts for findings:
A. That the proposed alterations meet the criteria in
Section 2.24.120 of the Historic Preservation Code which
requires that the proposed alteration b2 consistent with the
purposes of the Ordinance, and that it not be detrimental to a
structure of aesthetic, cultural , architectural , or engineering
interest or value of an historic nature; and
B. That the proposal meets the requirements of Section 2.24.120
because it uses matching materials, echoes the design of the
original , does not alter, harm or destroy important features of
the original , and enhances its viability and value as a
commercial structure, and that it is appropriate for the
intended change of use to the existing structure; and
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 90-04
LAP 90-03
April 5, 1990
Page 2
C. The proposal increases the likelihood that the Winery and
Distillery Buildings will be retained and maintained in a
consistent and economically viable manner.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-03,
Thomas Winery and Distillery Building as described in the March 1 , 1990 Staff
Report with the following conditions :
1 . Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the plans
submitted and provided with the Staff Report dated March 1,
1990, and consists of modifications that will match the existing
materials and finishes of the structure.
2. All applicable conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-26
and Design Review Comments of February 8, 1990 shall be complied
with.
3. Submission to and approval by the Historic Preservation
Commission of a detailed artifacts plan, that includes details
concerning the location, installation, maintenance, and
interpretive signage prior to any tenant improvement plans for
the Winery building.
4. Submission to and approval by the Historic Preservation
Commission of a detailed landscape plan that has been revised
more consistently with the heritage of the Winery and more
appropriate in terms of context.
5 . The design of the monument sign should be similar to the old
barrel sign previously existing on the site.
6. Provide detail specifications as to the acid etching of the new
metal siding and the toning down of the color on the Still
building.
7. Submission to and approval by the Historic Preservation
Commission of detailed plans and specifications for outdoor
furniture, which shall consist of heavy wood, "Mexican Style" -
type bench and table settings.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 90-04
LAP 90-03
April 5, 1990
Page 3
8. Repaint the parking lot lights black or if approved by the
Planning Commission, remove those lights directly in front of
the Winery building.
9. If feasible, replace the E1 Camino Real sign that previously
existed on the property, as well as the Rains House directional
sign.
10. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the structures are not altered as
approved within twenty-four (24) months from the date of this
approval .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.
BY:
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNEP., BANKS,, 'COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS : NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 90-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 90-04, THE
LORD HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE - APN:
202-061-12 .
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I : The application applies to the modifications as
indicated by the applicant's letter dated February 12, 1990, with the
structure and property located at Assessor's Parcel No. 202-061-12, and as
modified by the Historic Preservation Commission at their hearing on March 1 ,
1990.
SECTION II : Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above referenced public hearing on March 1 , 1990,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows :
A. That the proposed action is consistent with the purpose of
Chapter 2.24 of the City Municipal Code and ;
B. That the proposed action will not be detrimental to the
structure from a significant aesthetic, cultural , architectural ,
or engineering interest or value of an historic nature and;
C. That the action proposed is necessary to assure the continued
and consistent maintenance and condition of the structure.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 90-03
LAP 90-04 —LORD HOUSE
April 5, 1990
Page 2
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-04,
the Lord House, as described in the March 1 , 1990 Staff Report, with the
following conditions:
1 . Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the plans and
specifications provided within the Staff Report dated March 1,
1990 and consist of the modifications indicated in
Alternative C, the Alternate Tract Map and further refined in
Exhibit "A" and attached hereto.
2. This approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the modifications as indicated have
not been completed within 24 months from the date of approval .
3. Detail plan for the approved modifications to the site and
structure, including fencing and architectural revisions, shall
be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for their
review and approval prior to the issuance of any building
permits for said tract. Implementation of the plans by the
Historic Preservation Commission shall be prior to occupancy
being released for model homes for the subject tract.
4. The applicant shall provide the City with a detailed landscape
maintenance agreement for the property, prepared to the
satisfaction of the City Attorney and City Planner, establishing
minimum standards for landscape maintenance as well as a
five-year performance guarantee.
APPR07 AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.
GaL
BY:
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER_, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON,
NOES : COMMISSIONERS : - -SCHMIDT__ _
NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 90-01 TO DESIGNATE THE
STEGMEIER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7050 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 227-101-13 .
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held on March 1 ,
1990, ' a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the
proposed Historic Landmark Designation.
SECTION 1 : The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby makes the following findings in connection with the Staff
Report and Exhibits dated March 1 , 1990:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1 . The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building,
which was once common but is now rare.
3 . The proposed landmark was connected with a business or use
which was once common but is now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1 . The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, and City.
SECTION 2 : Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Section 15308) .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic
Landmark 90-01 to designate the . Stegmeier House, 7050 Etiwanda
Avenue, and its site, to the City Council as an Historic Landmark.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 90-02
LD 90-01 - STEGMEIER HOUSE
March 1, 1990
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 1990.
B Y: \?z �l �(�^G% /
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER,. BANKS,, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON,
SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 90-01, THE ALTA
LOMA HONOR ROLL, LOCATED AT 7172 AMETHYST STREET, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - APN: 202-083-14.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application applies to the moving of the Alta Loma
Honor Roll located at Assessor Parcel Number 202-083-14 to Assessor Parcel
Number 202-101-07 and the addition of Vietnam Veterans killed in action to the
Honor Roll sheets.
SECTION II : The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2 .24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
A. The proposed action is consistent with the purpose of Chapter 2.24 of
the City Municipal Code and;
B. The proposed action will not be detrimental to the structure from a
significant aesthetic, cultural , architectural , or engineering
interest or value of an historic nature and;
C. The action proposed is necessary to assure the continued and
consistent maintenance and condition of the structure.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-01
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 90-01 - ALTA LOMA HONOR ROLL
February 1, 1990
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-01 ,
the Alta Loma Honor Roll , as described in the February 1 , 1990 Staff Report
with the following conditions :
1. Alterations and rehabilitations shall comply with the site plan
provided within the Staff Report dated February 1 , 1990 and
consist of repairs that will match the existing materials and
finishes of the structure.
2 . In addition to the names of Vietnam War Veterans killed in
action and contained within the Staff Report, the City staff is
directed to contact the U.S. Defense Department to obtain the
names of all military personnel who resided in Alta Loma and
served in the Vietnam War and add them to the Honor Roll .
3. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic
Preservation Commission, if the structure is not moved within
twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1990.
BY: ozz� V24
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, BANKS, ARNER, COOPER, HASKVITZ,
PRESTON, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 89-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 89-05 FOR THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY
HOUSE, 9686 HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
91701 - APN: 1061-561-03
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation .
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Alteration Permit.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application applies to the house located at Assessor
Parcel Number 1061-561-03.
SECTION II : The proposed landmark alteration meets the following
criteria established in Chapter 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code:
A. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this
ordinance.
B. The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature
of significant aesthetic, cultural , architectural , or engineering
interest or value of an historic nature.
SECTION III : This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA
(Article 10, Section 15301) .
SECTION IV : Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this
Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 89-05
for alterations to the Demens-Tolstoy House as described in the December 7 ,
1989 staff report, with the following conditions:
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 89-04
LAP 89-05 - DEMENS-TOLSTOY
December 7, 1989
Page 2
1 . Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the approved plans
attached to this report, specifically, Sheets #4, 6, and 8. Historic
preservation staff shall review and approve final building plans
prior to issuance of building permits. If sufficient financing is
not available to carry out these plans the original plans as shown on
Sheet 3 shall be used.
2 . Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic Preservation
Commission, if building permits are not issued within twenty-four
(24) months from the date of approval .
3. Roofing material shall match the existing material as closely as
possible. A sample shall be submitted to and approved by Historic
Preservation staff prior to issuance of building permits.
4. The Historical Building Code shall be applied to this project.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989.
BY: C 4 `
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: PRESTON, BANKS, HASKVITZ, COOPER, ARNER, SCHMIDT,
BILLINGS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 89-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT LOCATED AT ARCHIBALD
AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET AS A LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel Num er - 62-04.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark is significant historically and.
architecturally:-tonstructed on the site of the original 1887 depot and
incorporating a portion of the orginal freight room, the building was
constructed in 1945. It is now one of the last of this style depot in
Southern California. Furthermore, the depot played an important role in the
life of the community. Although a simple building, it is also important
architecturally because it is in the Art Moderne style, a rarity in Rancho
Cucamonga. It thus contributes to the architecural diversity of the City.
The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established in
Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical
style, the Art Moderne style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was
once common but is now rare, namely, a World War II-era depot.
3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business and use which was
once common but is now rare; it enabled citrus, orchard crops, and
grapes to be shipped all over the world.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-03
CUCAMONGA DEPOT
December 7 , 1989
Page 2
4. The site is the location of an important historic building, the
original 1887 depot.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and
familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city.
(Ord. 70 S9,1979) .
SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19,
Section .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this om�ion and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of designation of the
Cucamonga Depot as a landmark.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989.
HISTOR ERVATWNC01SS N I OF THE ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Bo c mi t, airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: PRESTON, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT,
BILLINGS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 89-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DESIGNATION OF THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE LOCATED AT 9686
HILLSIDE ROAD AS A LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows :
SECTION I : The application generally applies to property located
within Assessor Parcel Number 1061-561-03 as shown on Exhibit "A", an area of
.89 acres measuring approximately 210 feet by 185 feet.
SECTION II : The proposed landmark meets the following criteria
established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code :
A. Historical and Cultural Significance :
1. The proposed landmark is particularly
representative of an historical period, type,
style, region , and way of life.
2. The proposed landmark was connected with
someone renowned and important.
3. The proposed landmark is an example of a type
of building that is now rare.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance :
1. The construction materials used in the
proposed landmark are unusual , and uniquely
effective.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-02
DEMENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE
June 1, 1989
Page 2
2. The overall effect of the design of the
proposed landmark is beautiful , its details
and materials are beautiful and unusual .
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in its location
represents an established and familiar visual
feature of the neighborhood and community.
SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article
19, Section 15308 .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Council and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City
Council does hereby approve designation of The Demens-Tolstoy House as a
landmark.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 1989
BY: CY//' A9
Bob Schmidt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, PRESTON, SCHMIDT, COOPER, HASKVITZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, BILLINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 89-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE ALTA LOMA FIRE HALL LOCATED AT 9493
LOMITA AS A LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel Num e—r 02--083-05.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria
establishe i—n Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significane:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historical period and' way of life.
2. The proposed landmark is associated with several
local personalities.
3. The proposed landmark was an important community
building.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood and community.
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 89-01
RE: ALTA LOMA FIRE HALL
January 5, 1989
Page 2
SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19,
Section .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this ommission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of designation of The
Alta Loma Fire Hall as a landmark.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989.
BY:
Bob
mi airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, ARNER, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 83-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
DESIGNATION OF THE ALTA LOMA HEIGHTS CITRUS ASSOCIATION
PACKING HOUSE BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 7125 AMETHYST AVENUE,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to the buildings built in 1914
and 1929 onon t�operty located at Assessor Parcel Number 202-151-12.
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the
following cri— terra established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, style, region, and way of life.
2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is an example of a type
of building which was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected with
important local personalities.
4. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest in its location
represents an established and familiar visual feature of the
community.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-20
ALTA LOMA PACKING HOUSE
December 1, 1988
Page 2
SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from
CEQA [Tr—fl—cTe-73, Section 15308) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this ommmmission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend designation of The Alta Loma
Heights Citrus Association Packing House as a Point of Historic Interest.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988.
BY: C2a -�1
Bobmi t, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE BEVERLY HILLS HOUSE LOCATED AT 9786 ARROW
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel Num e—r 2US-291-02.
SECTION II: The proposed Landmark meets the following criteria
establishe in apter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical style.
B. Historic Architectural Significance:
1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful , and its details are beautiful and unusual .
SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19,
Section .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this ommission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of designation of The
The Beverly Hills House as a Landmark.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-19
BEVERLY HILLS HOUSE
December 1, 1988
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988.
BY:
ob Schmidt,( ?W Airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
DESIGNATION OF THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9488 19TH
STREET AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel Num e�01=474-02.
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the
following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code:
A. Historical and cultural Significance:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly
representative of an historical period.
2. The site is the location of an important historical building.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed Point of Historic
nterest in its ocatIon represents an established and familiar
visual feature of the Community.
SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from
CEQA rtic e , Section 15308) .
SECTION IV: If this building is to be rehabilitated, it should be
reconsiider—e—d- r designation as a landmark.
SECTION V: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this om�ion and based on the findings set forth above,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISISON RESOLUTION NO. 88-18
ALTA LOMA SCHOOL
December 1 , 1988
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve a recommendation to the City
Council of designation of The Alta Loma School as a Point of Historic
Interest.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988.
BY: L&-a-
bob Schmidt, Gnairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DESIGNATION OF THE HELLMAN AVENUE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH
OF BASE LINE, SOUTH OF LA RONDA AS A POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located i,n the City's
right-of-way.
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the
following cr�eria—established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal -Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed point of historic interest is particularly
representative of an historical period and way of life.
2. The proposed point of historic interest is connected
with a business and use which was once common but is now
rare.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1.The overall effect of the design of the proposed point of
interest is beautiful .
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed point of interest materially benefits the
historic character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed point of historic interest represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
community.
SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEQA rtic e , Section 15308).
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve designation of Hellman Avenue
Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI'SIsgtt DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988.
BY:
BOb SChM!(It, C airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, COOPER, BANKS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE RELPH HOUSE LOCATED AT 9468 LOMITA AVENUE
AS A LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor
Parcel Num eer 2UZ--081-15.
SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria
establishe in apter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a
historical period, style, and way of life.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed landmark is associated with an important local
family.
4. The proposed landmark was connected with a historical business.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood.
SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19,
Section .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by
this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
HPC STAFF REPORT 88-16
The Relph House
August 3, 1988
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of designation of The
Relph House as a landmark.
APPROVED AND ADO TED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 1988.
BY: �/�1.0'�
Bobc mi t, airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKViTZ; COOPER, SCHMIDT, ARNER, BILLINGS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DESIGNATION OF THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUE
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT LOCATED IN THE MEDIAN ISLAND OF
HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL AND WILSON
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and
reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby
specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION I: The application applies to property located along Haven
Avenue me ia3'n islands north of Foothill .
SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the
following cr�establshed in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected
with important local organizations and people.
2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is
particularly representative of a period and way of
life.
B. Architectural Significance:
1. The overall effect of the design was beautiful .
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest in its
location was an established and familiar visual
feature of the City.
SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEQA r Uc e , Section 15308) .
SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed
by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above,
HPC RESOLUTION NO. 88-15
HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
August 4, 1988
Page 2
NOVI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby approve designation of the Haven Avenue
Beautification Project as a Point of Historic Interest.
APTRKD AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988.
BY:
BTSc�imi3'E-, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, HASKViTZ, COOPER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STAMM
RESOLUTION NO. 88-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE 9874 ARROW ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark
Designation.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma e—s�ie Tollowing findings:.
A. Historic and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common but is now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting
1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood (Ord. 70 S9,
1979) .
SECTION 2: Designation of a Landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Section
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of
9874 Arrow Route as a Landmark.
APPROVED A"OPTED THI 7TH DAY OF JULY, 1988.
BY
ar Banks, c n air s
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ, ARNER, COOPER, BANKS, STAMM
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
RESOLUTION NO. 88-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE LOCATED AT 7980
VINEYARD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a
duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the
proposed Historic Landmark Designation.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation
Commission e— r�a makes the following findings:
A. Historical and Cultural. Significance;
1. The proposed landmark is particularly
representative of an historical style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type
of building which was once common but is now
rare.
3. The proposed landmark was connected with an
important family.
4. The proposed landmark is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is
now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark in its location
represents an establish and familiar visual
feature of the neighborhood, community and
city. (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979)
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from
CEQA. (Art-cle Z , Section 15308)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga
Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council approval of Historic Landmark Designation of the Thomas
House, 7980 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
The Thomas House
July 7, 1988
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF JULY, 1988.
BY: A D, I. -)ql�� j )L- JL�'
Marsha Banks, c r an
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM, ARNER, BANKS, HASKVITZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
RESOLUTION NO. 88-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
THE APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE THE ETIWANDA GRAPE PRODUCTS
COMPANY LOCATED AT 9730 ETIWANDA AVENUE AS A POINT OF
HISTORIC INTEREST
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a hearing to
consider all comments on the proposed Point of Historic Interest.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma esk tFe—fbollowing findings:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly
representative of an historical way of life.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type
of buildings which was once common, but is now
rare.
3. The proposed landmark was connected with a
local personality.
4. The proposed landmark is connected with a
business or use which was once common, but is
now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark in its location
represents an established and familiar visual
feature of the community.
SECTION 2: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEQA. (7rtic a 19, Section 15308)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of
the Etiwanda Grape Products Company as a Point of Historic Interest.
ROVED ANDTED THIS TH DAY OF JULY, 1988.
BY:
Mars a Banks, Artina_Chair n. _'
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, HASKVITZ, STAMM, BANKS, COOPER,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
RESOLUTION NO. 88-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE THE ROBERDS HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7201
AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation.
SECTION 1: , The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma es t e ollowing findings:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period and style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed landmark was connected with a local personality.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed' landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood and community
(Ord. 70 S9, 1979) .
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Secti—on—T53UU.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of
Historic Landmark Designation of the Roberds House, 7201 Amethyst Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga.
APPROVED OPTED T S 7TH DAY OF JULY, 1988.
BY: ���
a a ants, c rai n
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM, HASKVITZ, ARNER, BANKS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
RESOLUTION NO. 88-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 88-02 FOR THE MINOR HOUSE LOCATED
AT 10089 BASE LINE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed landmark
alteration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes
of the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance;
and
2. The action proposed will not be detrimental to a
structure or feature of significant aesthetic,
cultural , architectural , or engineering interest or
value of a historic nature.
SECTION 2: That the proposed alteration is in accord with the
General P a�—
SECTION 3: That the Landmark Alteration Permit 88-02 is approved
subject to t e o owing conditions:
1. That the Planning Commission issue a Negative
Declaration indicating that this project will not
create adverse impacts on the environment.
2. That the Planning Commission review and approve
Parcel Map No. and Conditional Use Permit
No.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation •Commission does hereby approved Landmark Alteration Permit 88-02.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bobc mi airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, BANKS, ARNER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 88-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK TO DESIGNATE THE LORD
HOUSE LOCATED AT 6797 HELLMAN, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A
HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 202-061-12
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma es t e ollowing findings for the Lord House and its site.
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
was once common but is now rare.
3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
4. The proposed landmark was connected with a business or use which
was once common but is now rare.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and
city.
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Section
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark
Designation of 6797 Hellman, The Lord House and its site, to the City Council .
--AqRO VEDr AND' DOP�S 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988.
BY.
o c milt, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 88-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE SEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE LOCATED AT
DAY CANYON, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of
Historic Interest Designation.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma es a ollowing findings:
1. The Sedge Bog is rare.
2. The Sedge Bog is of great age.
3. The Sedge Bog is an established feature .of the
community.
4. The Sedge Bog is of educational and cultural , as
well as ecological value to the community.
5. Designation of the Sedge Bog is in the spirit of the
Mission of the Historic Preservation Commission and
of the intent of the Historic Preservation
Commission Ordinance.
SECTION 2: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEQA. r is a 19, Section 15308)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Bog as a Point
of Historic Interest to the City Council .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988.
BY:
RESERVA T,bON COM�N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Bobc mi t,,CliCii rman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 88-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE THE FISHER HOUSE LOCATED AT 7165
ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation No.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma e—s t e�ollowing findings:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period and style.
2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which
is now rare.
3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
4. The proposed landmark is connected with a (historic) business.
B. Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful .
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed landmark in' its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the community.
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Section
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission, does hereby recommend approval of The Fisher House as
a Historic Landmark to the City Council .
PROVED AND TED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988.
BY: (2�1Zp�
Bobc imi t, unairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER,, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKVITZ
RESOLUTION NO. 88-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST "J" TO DESIGNATE
THE SCHOWALTER ROCK PILE LOCATED BETWEEN VISTA GROVE AND
WILSON, 660 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS
POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST "J"
WHEREAS, the Historic. Preservation Commission had held a hearing to
consider all comments on the proposed Point of Historic Interest "J".
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby es ma clt e�following findings:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly
representative of an historical period, type, style,
region, or way of life.
2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected with
someone renowned, important, or local personality.
3. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with a
business or use which was once common but is now rare.
B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in
the proposed Point of Historic Landmark are unusual or
significant or uniquely effective.
C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest in its location
represents an established and familiar visual feature of
the neighborhood, community or city. (Ord. 70 S9, 1979)
SECTION 2: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt
from CEQA r is a 19, Section 15308)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Point of Historic
Interest "J" to the City Council
A---( Schmidt,
AND ADOP E THIS 7TH AY OF APRIL, 1988.
BY:
Bobo airman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, ARNER, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, STAMM,. HASKVITZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 88-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 3D TO
DESIGNATE NABISCO BRANDS, INC./ELLENA BROTHERS WINERY
LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 30
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation No. 30;
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma escl— tFe following findings:
A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of a historical period, type, style, region, or way
of life.
B. The proposed landmark was connected with someone
renowned, important, or local personality.
C. The proposed landmark is connected with a business
or use which was once common but is now rare.
D. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community or city.
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Sectio-FISTYST
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark
Designation No. 3'0' to the City Council
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988.
Bob - -4111�
c mi t, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, ARNER, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, STAMM HASKVITZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 88-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 30 TO
DESIGNATE THE "STATOM-BINGHAM HOUSE" LOCATED AT 6743
AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION NO. 30
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation No. 30.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma ek�Fol-lowing findings:
A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative
of an historical period, type, style, region, and
way of life.
B. The proposed landmark was connected with someone
important.
C. The construction materials are unusual and
significant.
D. The overall effect of the design of the proposed
landmark is beautiful , and its details and materials
are unusual .
E. The proposed landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, and city.
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article
19, Section
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark
Designation No. 30 to the City Council .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988.
BY: ca aJ4,1�
Bobc mi t, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: rAF2NER, HASKVITZ;'BANKS;_SCHMIDTL'
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: iBIL`LI�!GS
\ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STAMM, ARNER, SCHMIDT, HASKVITZ, COOPER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
--carried
B. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7125 AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
proposalodesignate e a Loma e g s i rus sac a on Packing
House, 7125 Amethyst Avenue, a Historic Landmark - APN: 202-151-12.
Arlene Banks presented the staff report. She stated that the owner has
requested a continuance until the July 7, 1988 regular meeting.
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing.
Henry Pfsenreiter, Plant Manager, representing American National Can Company,
stated that he 'was not at the last meeting. He stated that they are not
against designation, but they have alot of questions that need to be answered
first.
Commissioner Banks stated that according to the Ordinance, there is no
requirement to maintain the buildings, it just cannot be altered without
review. She stated that maybe the corporate office could be made aware of the
advantages of the buildings becoming landmarks.
Christina Sierra, attorney retained by the corporate office, stated that they
were retained only three (3) days ago and that is why they are requesting a
continuance. She stated that the corporate office is mainly concerned with
the affect of the value of the property that the designation will have and
limitations on uses and alterations.
Commissioner Banks stated that the Commission has had a policy to work with
landmark owners in adapting structures so they may be maintained.
Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, stated that if it was designated, the
Historic Building Code could be used which is much less restrictive and more
adapted to preserve these older wood-frame buildings. He stated that there
are also tax incentives that might be utilized.
Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Arner moved to continue the designation of 7125 Amethyst Avenue
to the July 7, 1988 regular meeting. Commissioner Stamm seconded the
motion. The motion carried by the following vote:
HPC MINUTES -3- JUNE 2 , 1988
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, STAMM, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
--carried
C. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE STATOM-GINGHAM HOUSE, 6743 AMETHYST
Arlene Banks presented the staff report.
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no comment, Chairman
Schmidt closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Stamm expressed concern over the use of wood on the roof because
of the termite problem.
Commissioner Banks stated she does not like to make a decision without the
owner present, but did not want to keep continuing the decision.
Commissioner Arner moved to recommend approval of a Historic Landmark
Designation of the Statom-Bingham House to the City Council . Commissioner
Haskvitz seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, HASKVITZ, BANKS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS
carried
D. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE ROBERDS HOUSE, 7201 AMETHYST AVENUE ORIGINALLY
THE NAZARENE CHURCH, A HISTORIC - -
Arlene Banks presented the staff report.
Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing.
Ron Roberds, grandson of Will Roberds, stated that they would like to request
a continuance to the July 7, 1988 regular meeting to review the Ordinance
requirements and to turn it over to their attorneys for review.
Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing.
HPC MINUTES -4- JUNE 2 , 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 29 TO
DESIGNATE THE "ADAMS HOUSE" LOCATED AT 7914 ALTA CUESTA
DRIVE AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 29
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation No. 29.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby ma esk—t e Following findings:
A. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life.
B. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned,
important or local personality.
C. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is
beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual .
D. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character
of the neighborhood.
E. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established
and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood community, or
city.
SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark
Designation No. 29 to the City Council .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Bobcimi , iairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT, STAMM, HASKVITZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO. 88-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 27 TO
DESIGNATE "THE SCHOWALTER HOUSE" LOCATED AT 5495 HERMOSA
AVENUE AS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NO. 27
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic
Landmark Designation No. 27.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission
hereby makes�ie f--oF owing findings:
A. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common, but is now rare.
B. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative
of the historical period, type, style, region, or way
of life.
C. The proposed Landmark is connected with someone
renowned, important, or of a local personality.
D. The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or
use which was once common, but is now rare.
SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for
adoption by�i Ce i'fy— Council for this Historic Landmark Designation, based
upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic
Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark
Designation No. 27 to the City Council .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988.
JmejlCen rner, arman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM
i
RESOLUTION NO. 88-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 88-01 FOR THE CHINA TOWN HOUSE
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD
AND KLUSMAN AVENUE IN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC
PLAN DISTRICT, 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD
A. Recitals.
(i ) Carmen Navarette has filed an application for the issuance of
the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. 88-01 as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic
Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(1i ) On the 4th of February, 1988, the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii ) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on February 4, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Klusman Avenue, 9591 San
Bernardino Road, and includes both Parcel 1 and 2 of Tentative Parcel Map
11044.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in Paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) The action proposed is consistent with the
purposes of Ordinance No. 70; and
(b) The action will not be detrimental to a
structure or future of significant aesthetic,
cultural , architectural , or engineering
HPC RESOLUTION NO.
RE: LAP 88-01
February 4, 1988
Page 2
interest or value of a historic nature; and
(c) The proposed action is not in conflict with the
provisions of the General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
the following:
A. That a protective covenant be recorded with Parcels
1 and 2 of Parcel Map 11044 to provide the
following:
1) That all mature trees on the site shall be
retained unless their removal is approved
through the Design Review Process and issuance
of a Tree Removal Permit by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and
2) That any site work performed on Sites 1 and 2
be performed under the supervision of an
archaeologist approved by the City for the
purposes of saving all valuable historic
artifacts which may be discovered during site
development; and
3) That for the purposes of compatibility of
future development with historic character of
the China House, Parcel 2 shall remain as a
part of the Chinatown House Historic Landmark
designation, and therefore a Historic Landmark
Alteration Permit will be needed to further
develop either parcel .
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988.
BY:
e icen rner, Chairman
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM