HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-04-23 - Agenda Packet
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
April 23, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Chairman Morales
Vice Chairman Boling
Commissioner Dopp
Commissioner Daniels
Commissioner Diaz
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Commission (“Planning
Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the
Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included
on the agenda, but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 9th, 2025.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D1. DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX - A
request for site plan and architectural review of a 45,993 square foot addition to an existing 98,406
square foot industrial building and a Conditional Use Permit to operate a manufacturing use within
Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone, at 8949 Toronto Avenue; APN: 0209-401-05. The project qualifies
as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects.
The project also qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 –
Existing Facilities (Design Review DRC2023-00379 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288).
E. GENERAL BUSINESS
E1. Urban Design Presentation by Torti Gallas. (Verbal Report Only)
F. DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
H. ADJOURNMENT
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,
given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may
present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience
should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing
impaired.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After
speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your
name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited
to 3 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.”
As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed
to the Commissioners and included in the record.
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeals filed must be in writing with the City Clerk’s
Office, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by an appeal fee pursuant to the most adopted
fee schedule for all decisions for the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session.
I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted Seventy-Two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California
and on the City's website.
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 9, 2025
Page 1 of 3
2
8
3
1
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission Agenda
April 9, 2025
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was
held on April 9th, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Boling at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Diaz;
Chairman Morales and Commissioner Daniels absent.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Jared
Knight, Assistant Planner; Claudia Vargas, Associate Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive
Assistant.
B. Public Communications
There were no public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 12, 2025.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Commissioner Diaz. Motion carried 3-0-2,
with Chairman Morales and Commissioner Daniels absent.
D. Public Hearings
D1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – FLORA BUNDA – A request to operate a home décor
wholesale, distribution and warehouse facility within an existing 105,858 square foot industrial
building within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, located at 8545 Pecan Ave; APN:0229-171-02. This
item is exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under
CEQA Section 15301- Existing Facility (Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00289).
Associate Planner Vargas presented a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Dopp asked staff whether the applicant conducted onsite sales at their previous
location and if they plan to do the same at their new location, or is it merely warehouse oriented.
Page 3
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 9, 2025
Page 2 of 3
2
8
3
1
Associate Planner Vargas replied that it is warehouse oriented. The showroom is meant to be for
their advertisement only, and it will not be open to the public.
Vice Chairman Boling opened the public hearing.
Architect Chen attended on behalf of the applicant, who was unable to attend.
Vice Chairman Boling inquired whether the expansion into the larger facility resulted in the
creation of new jobs.
Design Chen confirmed.
Hearing no comments from the public, Vice Chairman Boling closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Dopp stated that when the Neo Industrial zone was first established, the goal was
to attract businesses with a dynamic that goes beyond just warehouses. He expressed
disappointment that this element was not present. However, beyond that, the commissioners are
always pleased to see businesses grow.
Vice Chairman Boling concurred with Commissioner Dopp, stating the goal is to create economic
value within the community. He emphasized that the potential for sales tax generation, in addition
to business-to-business sales, could increase property tax revenue. Having additional sales tax
revenue would be beneficial in an area zoned as Neo Industrial. However, he also expressed his
appreciation for the city’s business retention program, which encourages existing businesses to
thrive and promotes employment opportunities within the city.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution
2025-009, Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00289. Motion carried 3-0-2, with Chairman Morales
and Commissioner Daniels absent.
D2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA – A request to change
the zoning map designation of two parcels located at 9750 and 9720 7th Street from, Center 1 –
Southwest Cucamonga (CE1-SC) to Neo-Industrial (NI), to correct an inconsistency with the
General Plan Land Use Map. This project qualifies for a statutory exemption under State CEQA
Guidelines section 15061(b) (3), as the proposed zoning map amendment will not have any direct
impact on the environment. APNs: 0209-211-68, 0209-211-69.
Assistant Planner Knight presented a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Vice Chairman Boling opened the public hearing.
Hearing no comments from the public, Vice Chairman Boling closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution
2025-010, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00044. Motion carried 3-0-2, with Chairman
Morales and Commissioner Daniels absent.
E. Director Announcements
Principal Planner McPherson stated that the next meeting is scheduled for April 23rd and that a
special presentation on Urban Design will be included.
Page 4
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 9, 2025
Page 3 of 3
2
8
3
1
F. Commission Announcements
Commissioner Dopp formally welcomed back Serita Young. We are all excited to have her back
with us again.
G. Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adjoin the meeting.
Hearing no objections, Vice Chairman Boling adjourned the meeting at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department
Approved:
Page 5
DATE:April 23, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – GOREE
ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX - A request for site plan and architectural
review of a 45,993 square foot addition to an existing 98,406 square foot
industrial building and a Conditional Use Permit to operate a manufacturing
use within Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone, at 8949 Toronto Avenue;
APN: 0209-401-05. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. The
project also qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (Design Review DRC2023-00379 and
Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the resolutions of approval for Design
Review DRC2023-00379 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288, subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
The project site is located at 8949 Toronto Avenue and is developed with a 98,406-square-foot
industrial building constructed in 1995 by Cal Box. Cal Box manufactures and distributes custom
designed corrugated boxes for businesses. They are proposing an expansion of their existing
facility to store raw materials and finished goods manufactured on site. The parcel is
approximately 532 feet from east to west and 613 feet from north to south, with an area of
approximately 336,283 square feet (7.7 acres). The right-of-way improvements, including
sidewalk, curb, gutter, landscaping, and utility undergrounding along Toronto Avenue, have been
completed and will remain as part of this project. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning
designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
North BNSF/Metrolink
Right of Way --
South Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
East Vacant Land City Center Center 2 (CE2)
West Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
Page 6
Page 2 of 5
2
7
9
2
ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes constructing a 45,993-square-foot addition along the west elevation of
the existing 98,406-square-foot industrial building. The addition will be used to store raw materials
and finished goods related to the site's primary manufacturing use, which is proposed to continue
in relation to the subject request for entitlements. While the use is permitted with a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) pursuant to Development Code Section 17.136.020 (Allowed Land Uses), the
existing building is nonconforming in terms of street-side setbacks.
Development Code Section 17.62.030-B (Alterations and Additions to Nonconforming Uses and
Structures) states:
“No nonconforming structure shall be altered or reconstructed in a way that increases the
discrepancy between existing conditions and the standards for front yard, side yards, rear
yard, height of structures, distances between structures, and parking facilities.”
The proposed addition will reduce the discrepancy between current conditions (190-foot setback
from the face of the curb on Toronto Avenue) and the required setbacks (15 feet minimum), as
the addition will bring the overall building closer to the street (70 feet from the face of the curb).
Figure 1: Site Plan
Page 7
Page 3 of 5
2
7
9
2
Design
The proposed building addition will be of concrete tilt-up construction and designed to
match the existing building, including the use of form lines and high windows. A two-story
design element with glazing has been added to the southwest corner of the addition to
create an office-like appearance, along with new landscaping along the west and south
elevations and decorative paving at the main vehicle entrance.
The landscaping in the existing parking lot area will be enhanced to meet current
landscape requirements, including the addition of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. The
existing and new loading areas, dock doors, and trailer parking stalls will be located on
the north and south elevations of the building and screened from public view by an
existing wall and by the building.
Figure 2: Colored Rendering
Development Code Conformity
The project was designed to bring the site into closer conformance with development standards
of the Mixed Employment 2 (Zone) including building and parking setbacks, number of parking
spaces, and floor area ratio as shown in the following tables:
Required Provided Compliant?
Building Setback (Street)15 Feet Maximum 70 Feet Yes*
Building Setback (Side)N/A 40 and 50 Feet Yes
Building Setback (Rear)N/A 135 Feet Yes
Parking Setback 10 Foot Minimum 81 Feet Yes
Landscape Coverage N/A 10.8 Percent Yes
Floor Area Ratio .4 – 2.0 Percent 43 Percent Yes
Building Height 4 Stories (Maximum)1 Story Yes
*The proposed addition will bring the building into greater conformance with the required streetside setback in
compliance with Development Code Section 17.62.030-B related to Nonconforming Uses and Structures.
Page 8
Page 4 of 5
2
7
9
2
Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Office Parking
(5,585 SF)1:250 SF 22 Spaces 22 Spaces
Manufacturing
(11,779 SF)2:1,000 SF 24 Space 24 Space
Warehouse Parking
(180,186 SF)
1:1,000 for 1st 20,000 SF
1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF
1:4,000 for the Remaining SF
48 Spaces 48 Spaces
Total Vehicle
Parking 94 Spaces 94 spaces
Trailer Parking 1 per Dock High Door 11 Spaces 11 Spaces
Conditional Use Permit
Per Development Code Table 17.136.020-1 (Allowed Land Uses in Form-Based Zones),
manufacturing facilities exceeding 50,000 square feet are classified as Light Manufacturing Large
and require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). With the proposed expansion, the existing
manufacturing use is required to obtain a CUP to comply with this requirement.
Cal Box operates 24 hours a day, Monday through Friday, with up to 64 employees working in
two shifts. During peak periods, up to two Saturday shifts may be added per month between 2:00
a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Office personnel work from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
On average, 20 trucks access the site daily.
The expansion will not increase the number of employees or vehicles accessing the site but will
relocate existing outdoor activities indoors. The site has sufficient parking to accommodate the
current staff, trucks, and trailers.
Design Review Committee
The Design Review Committee (DRC – Daniels and Boling) reviewed the project on October 1,
2024. Staff presented the item, and committee members inquired about nonconforming setbacks
and compliance with other development standards.
Committee members also asked the applicant about their business history in Rancho Cucamonga
and operations related to the proposed addition. They noted that colored renderings were missing
from the plan set and requested that the applicant provide a rendering before the item goes to the
Planning Commission. The full set of plans attached as Exhibit B includes the requested color
renderings.
Public Art
This project is required to comply with the public art ordinance as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of
the Development Code. Based on the area of the proposed addition, the total art value required
Page 9
Page 5 of 5
2
7
9
2
per Section 17.124.020.C. is $45,993 ($1 per square foot). A condition has been included
pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be fulfilled prior to
occupancy.
Environmental Assessment
Planning staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under:
•Section 15332 (Infill Development Projects): Covers infill developments on sites less than
5 acres, with no significant impact on traffic, noise, air quality, or water.
•Section 15301 (Existing Facilities): Covers the Conditional Use Permit requirement for a
Manufacturing Use (Large) over 50,000 square feet in the ME2 Zone.
A Section 15332 CEQA exemption was prepared by UES (April 2025), an environmental
consultant hired by the City (Exhibit D – CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff reviewed
the exemption and confirmed that the project meets CEQA criteria and does not significantly
impact biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water. While the overall site is
approximately 7.7 acres in area, the area disturbed by the proposed improvements is significantly
below the 5-acre limit permitted by the Section 15332 exemption. The proposed addition will
replace a paved area currently used for outdoor storage with an enclosed building. The Planning
Director independently reviewed and concurred with staff’s findings.
Correspondence
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 8, 2025, the property was posted on April 9, 2025, and
notices were mailed to 15 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 8,
2025. To date, Staff has not received any comments related to the project to date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is
shared with the City. The proposed building addition will increase the value of the project site, and
the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The project supports the City Council's core value of the relentless pursuit of improvement by
increasing the operational efficiency of an existing manufacturing use within the city. The addition
will allow for the relocation of outdoor storage into an enclosed building, reducing visual clutter
and enhancing site aesthetics.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Project Location
Exhibit B – Project Plans
Exhibit C – DRC Comments and Meeting Minutes dated October 1, 2024
Exhibit D – Section 15332 Categorical Exemption Memorandum
Exhibit E – Draft Resolutions of Approval with Conditions of Approval
Page 10
•....
p ... ,, T "" §)�•�o. ... � . !,,... · .
p � ..
Project Location
Exhibit A
Page 11
&$/%2;,,:$5(+286((;3$16,21
7252172$9(18(5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$
$5&+,7(&76352-(&7 &
'(6,*15(9,(:
7+,6'5$: ,1*$1'7+(%,0&$'),/()520: +,&+,7+$6%((1*(1(5$7('$5(3529,'('$6$1,167580(172)6(59,&()257+,6352-(&7 7+(6('2&80(176$5(7+(62/(3523(57<*25(($5&+,7(&76,1&$1<86(2)7+(6('2&80(176'$7$$1''(6,*16)25385326(627+(57+$17+26($662&,$7(': ,7+7+,6352-(&7: ,7+2877+((;35(66(': 5,77(13(50,66,212)*25(($5&+,7(&76,1&,6352+,%,7('
&2168/7$176
0(3 &,9,/6758&785$/
*.(1*,1((56
:/223668,7(
%(//$,57;
&'5 '$//<$662&,$7(6
5,&+021'$9(18(68,7(
+2867217;
72:1&(17(5'5,9(68,7(
&267$0(6$&$
*.0(3&20 :::&'5:(67&20 '$//<$662&,$7(6&20
$352-(&7)25
&$/%2;([KLELWꢀ%ꢀꢁꢀ3URMHFWꢀ3ODQV
67$036,*1$785(
)25,17(5,05(9,(:
127,17(1'(')25
%,'',1*3(50,725
&216758&7,21385326(6
58'2/)253$*6$1-$1
-5
Page 12
SD MH
RAILROAD SPUR PP
FH
WV
PP
EDISON MH
FH
GATEKRAILCONCRETE SWALE
GATE
FH
WV
GATE
2 PROPANE FF 1110.86 FF 1111.43
TANKS FF 1111.40 FF 1111.86
FIRE SERVICE
LOADING DOCK
FF 1111.75
FF 1110.20
FF 1110.12
UTILITY MH
CO
GUY POLE
FH
VICINITY MAPLOT LT
STRUCTURAL STEEL
POST ON CONCRETE WV FH N.T.S.
AIR FF 1109.99 EASEMENT NOTESAIRFIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
ORDER NO. NCS-1166801-ONT1
FEBRUARY 6, 2023
UTI UNIT
4" FIRE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING 5 EASEMENT TO CUCAMONGA WATER COMPANY RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 1888 IN BOOK 69 OF DEEDS, PAGE 314.
LOCATION CANNOT BE LOCATED FROM RECORD INFORMATION
FF 1111.30 CO 6
7
8
9
EASEMENT TO METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1936 AS BOOK1168, PAGE 50 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-94, VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE RECORDED JUNE 29, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NO. 81-142194 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
CCR
FHWV
PARCEL 27
PARCEL MAP NO, 6194 GRANT OF RAILROAD EASEMENTS RECORDED JUNE 21, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-136515 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
FF 1109.74 10 RESOLUTION NO, 83-99, VACATION OF 8TH STREET RECORDED JULY 5, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-148882 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
11 COVENANTS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 18, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-160413 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
12 EASEMENT TO CADILLAC FAIRVIEW/CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR RAILROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 85-027233 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
13 CCR
TRANSFORMERS ON
CONCRETE PAD
GV FIRE SERVICE
STRUCTURAL STEEL POST ON
CONCRETE PIER ON CONCRETE AIR 14 EASEMENT TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECORDED JUNE 15, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 95-206651 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
15 EASEMENT TO METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORDED JULY 7, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT ON.95-231996 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
AIR
FF 1110.32 WV FH
FF 1109.24
8" DRNLOT LT
4" PIPE
FH
FF 1110.558" DRN
STRUCTURAL STEEL POST ON
CONCRETE PIER ON CONCRETE
RF 1145.25
FF 1109.38
FF 1109.12
FF 1109.04
RF 1147.77GATEFF 1109.29
EDISON BX FF 1109.87
RF 1141.86
RF 1146.02
RD RD 4" TRENCH
DRN4" FIRE
8" FIRE
2" BFP TRANSFORMER AND
EDSION BX ON
CONCRETE PADUTL BX
SMH4" FIRE
2" BFP SCO
WMSMH LOT LT FF 1110.16
WM WMWM
STLT
SIGN
GATE
FH WV
SIGN SIGN
FH
SMH LOT LT LOT LT
LOT LT LOT LT
UTL BX GTE BX
WV WV
WV WV
FH
SMH
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET
CG-01
REVISIONS PLANS PREPARED BY:A
05/01/24
NUMBER DATE APP'V'D BENCHMARK:CAL BOXTHE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
ELEVATION : 1117.66 01 OF
04BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,N 89°31'52"E
Page 13
APN:
0209-143-07-0000
NEO INDUSTRIAL
APN:
0209-143-26-0000
NEO INDUSTRIALAPN:
0209-143-08-0000
NEO INDUSTRIAL
APN:
0209-143-13-0000
NEO INDUSTRIAL
APN:
0209-143-05-0000
NEO INDUSTRIAL APN:
0209-143-11-0000 APN:
0209-143-27-0000NEO INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
APN:
0209-143-10-0000
RAILROAD
INDUSTRIAL
APN:
0209-143-14-0000
RAILROAD
INDUSTRIAL
ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SA
OWNER/APPLICANT
CALIFORNIA BOX 2PARCEL/USE DATAEIGHT STREET (VACATED)8949 TORONTO AVE.PARCEL MAP NO.APN ZONING USE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES
M.B. 20/1 ARCHITECT0209-143-05-0000 NEO INDUSTRIAL NEO INDUSTRIAL
APN:GOREE0209-272-30-0000
CITY CENTER
CENTER 2 ZONE
MAP 20032
P.M. 251/83-84 PAR. 1 0209-143-07-0000
0209-143-08-0000
0209-143-10-0000
0209-143-11-0000
0209-143-13-0000
0209-143-14-0000
0209-143-26-0000
NEO INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
RAILROAD
5151 SAN FELIPE ST. SUITE 1700
HOUSTON, TX 77056
CONTACT: RUDY PAGSANJAN
TEL: 713-660-6102MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR.3
MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR. 4 CIVIL ENGINEER
MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR. 5
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
695 TOWN CENTER DR. SUITE #110
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: AARON ALBERTSON, P.E.
TEL: 949-351-5325
NEO INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
NEO INDUSTRIAL
RAILROAD
APN:
0209-401-03-0000
APN:
0209-401-04-0000
APN:
0209-401-05-0000 MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR. 221ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR. 6 SURVEY
MAP 19637
P.M.247/93-94 PAR. 1
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
695 TOWN CENTER DR. SUITE #110
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: AARON ALBERTSON, P.E.
TEL: 949-351-5325
NEO INDUSTRIAL NEO INDUSTRIAL
ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES
M.B. 20/1 0209-143-27-0000 NEO INDUSTRIAL NEO INDUSTRIAL
ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES
M.B. 20/1 0209-272-20-0000
0209-272-26-0000
0209-272-30-0000
0209-401-03-0000
0209-401-04-0000
0209-401-05-0000
0209-401-06-0000
0209-401-22-0000
0209-401-23-0000
0209-411-18-0000
0209-411-19-0000
EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN CITY CENTER PROJECT INFORMATION
ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES
M.B. 20/1
FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY
CORRIDOR GENERAL OPEN SPACE 1. PER FEMA MAP NO. 06071C8635J, EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014
THE PROPERTY IS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AND LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X.MAP 148-36-63A PAR. 1
MAP 148-36-63A PAR. 1
CENTER 2 ZONE CITY CENTER
2. NOT SUBJECT TO LIQUEFACTION OR OTHER GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS,
SAID PROPERTY IS NOT IN ANY SPECIAL STUDY ZONES.APN:
0209-272-20-0000
CITY CENTER
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MAP 20032
P.M. 251/83-84 PAR. 1
3. SETBACKS OF SLOPES TO PROPERTY LINES SHALL CONFORM TO THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.
4. NO EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED ON SITE.
5. ALL SLOPES ARE AT A MAXIMUM OF 2:1 RATIO
6. TOTAL PARCEL ACREAGE: 336,283 SF / 7.72 AC
MAP 872-36-112 PAR. 2 MRO
MAP 19762
P.M. 250/72-74 PAR. 1
MAP 19762
P.M. 250/72-74 PAR. 2
MAP 19762
P.M. 250/72-74 PAR. 3
APN:MAP 148-36-63B PAR. 1
MAP 148-36-63B PAR. 1APN:
0209-401-23-0000
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
0209-401-06-0000
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONEAPN:
0209-401-22-0000
21ST CENTURY *PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARCGIS ZONING PLAN VIEWER (ZONING) & GENERAL PLAN VIEWER (LAND USE)
EMPLOYMENT MIXED
EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
APN:
0209-411-18-0000
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
APN:
0209-411-19-0000
21ST CENTURY EMPLOYMENT
MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 ZONE
APN:
0209-272-26-0000
GENERAL OPEN SPACE
FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORRIDOR
DRAWN BY:AM UTILIZATION MAP SHEET
CG-02
REVISIONS PLANS PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: AMA
DATE:05/01/24
NUMBER DATE APP'V'D BENCHMARK:CAL BOXTHE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
ELEVATION :1117.66 05/01/2024 02 OF
04BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
AARON M. ALBERTSON
R.C.E. 65513, EXP. 9/30/25N 89°31'52"E
Page 14
LEGEND:ABBREVIATIONS:
PROP. 26-FT WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL.FINAL LOCATION TO BE (XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATIONEXISTING CONCRETE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
PROP. CONCRETE
PROP. LANDSCAPE
PROP. MULTI-USE TRAIL
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING WALL
DETERMINED BY CITY ENGINEER BOW
CF
ELEV
ELEC
EX
BACK OF WALK
CURB FACE
ELEVATION
ELECTRICAL
EXISTING
FF
FL
FINISH FLOOR
FLOW LINE
FG
FS
GBINV
MAX
MH
MIN
MWD
FINISH GRADE
FINISH SURFACE
GRADE BREAKINVERT
MAXIMUM
MANHOLE
MINIMUM
MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
7.41TC
(6.91FS)XXXX
8.20DOOR
8.50FSDOOR
9.24FF9.22FS(6.58TC)(6.08FS)PROJECT INFORMATION PROPERTY LINEINTERIOR
RAMP TO @10% MAX9.24FF
OC
TC
TGTYP
W
ON CENTER
TOP OF CURB
TOP OF GRATETYPICAL
1. PER FEMA MAP NO. 06071C8635J, EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 THE PROPERTY
IS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AND LOCATED
WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X.
CENTERLINEEXISTING PROPANE
TANKS TO BE REMOVED PROP. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL
PROP. CONTOUR
WIDTH
(6.46TC)
(6.34TC)
6.53 9.24FF
9.22FS
2. NOT SUBJECT TO LIQUEFACTION OR OTHER GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS, SAID PROPERTY IS
NOT IN ANY SPECIAL STUDY ZONES.
WM WATER METER
FS
9.12TS (10.30FS)
(10.20FF)
3. SETBACKS OF SLOPES TO PROPERTY LINES SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.
:PROP. WATER LATERAL
PROP. SEWER LATERAL
PROP. STORM DRAIN
LIMITS OF WORK
6.51
FS (5)-6"RISERS
6.62FS-BS
66
4. ALL SLOPES ARE AT A MAXIMUM OF 2:1 RATIO
5. TOTAL PARCEL ACREAGE: 336,283 SF / 7.72 AC(9.90FS)6'VICINITY MAP(6.36TC)
(6.06TC)
(10.14FS)
10.12FFADJUST INTERIORSLAB TO 9.24 FF(9.99FF)
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
TO BE REMOVED UTILITY PROVIDERS N.T.S.EXISTING EASEMENT
SEE CG-01 FOR FURTHER DETAILSELECTRICITY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS
WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
CABLE: SPECTRUM
800-655-4555
800-427-2200
909-944-6000
888-892-4357
9.24FF-GB 2.0%OWNER/APPLICANT CIVIL ENGINEER SOILS ENGINEER PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS:PROP. STORM DRAIN
FOR ROOF DRAINAGE CHRIS WALDERA, PRESIDENT
CALIFORNIA BOX II
8949 TORONTO AVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TEL: 909-944-9202
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
695 TOWN CENTER DR. SUITE #110
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: AARON ALBERTSON, P.E.
TEL: 949-351-5325
NORCAL ENGINEERING
10641 HUMBOLT ST
LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720
CONTACT: SCOTT SPENSIERO
TEL: 562-799-9469
PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA: 65,430 SF
PROPOSED/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 57,128 SF
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA: 8,302 SF
TOTAL SITE AREA: 321,374 SF (7.37 ACRES)
2.0%ARCHITECT SURVEY PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK(5.81TC)
(5.69TC)
GOREE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
695 TOWN CENTER DR. SUITE #110
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
CONTACT: AARON ALBERTSON, P.E.
TEL: 949-351-5325
RAW CUT: 80 CY
RAW FILL: 2543 CY5151 SAN FELIPE ST. SUITE 1700
HOUSTON, TX 77056
CONTACT: RUDY PAGSANJAN, AIA
TEL: 832-463-0007PARCEL 27
PARCEL MAP NO, 6194
EXPORT: 2463 CY FILL
9.24
FF-GB
(9.74FF)THESE ARE ENGINEERING ESTIMATES ONLY AND THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO
PERFORM THEIR OWN TAKE-OFFS FOR EARTHWORK.
8.57FG (10.16FF)
10.14FS(5.52TC)
(5.27TC)
PROP. STORM DRAIN
FOR ROOF DRAINDOWNSPOUT
10.04FS-GB2.0%
5.39FS EX. RAMP TO BEREMOVED& REPLACED
9.24FF9.22FS 9.27
FS-GB W/ ADA ACCESS RAMP5.36FS 9.12TS(7)-6-1/4"RISERS5.48
FS-BS
(9.24FF)MATCH
(9.05TC)(8.68FS)EXISTING 8" DRAININLETS TO BE REMOVED
(1.5%)MATCH
(8.46TC)(7.96FS)
9.66TC9.16FS-GB 9.16FS-GB
(8.50FS)8.57FG 9.66TC
9.16FS-GB
PROPOSED SS LATERALMIN INV = 1101.6067TOP OF PIPE = 1102.1067PIPE COVER = 6.20 FEET
PROP. ADA
(4.34TC)(3.84FS)
ACCESS RAMPEX. TRANSFORMER
TO BE RELOCATED PROP.
9.24FF
9.22FS 9.24FF
9.22FS DETAIL A: PROPOSED ADA
ACCESS/PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
LIMITSOF SAWCUT(4.14TC)9.24FF9.22FS
9.24FF
9.22FS(7.65FS)7.58
FS-GB
5'
PROP.
6" SEWER LATERAL POCTO EX. SEWER MH
(4.19TC)(3.77FS)9.03FS PROPOSEDLPG
(4.31TC)STATION
EX. SSMH MATCH(8.63TC)(8.13FS)
TO REMAIN (8.16FS)EX. SSMHTO REMAIN
1100.25INV (APPROX.)8.24TC
7.74FS
(8.12FS)
(7.99FS)
(4.06TC)
8.22TC7.72FSMATCH(7.46FS)(3.82TC)
(4.44TC)
5.20TC-FS EX. WALL TOEX. 8" FIRE SERVICE
DCDA BE REMOVED.LIMITS OF SAWCUT/DEMOFOR NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT (7.59FS)(5.54TC)
(5.07FS)NEW EXT. CURB TOBE INSTALLED
(8.06FS)
(7.98FS)
(8.08FS)
TO REMAIN (8.38TC)ENDEX. WATERMETERS & BACKFLOWSTO REMAIN
7.58FS-GB
(7.35FS)CURB (7.79FS)(7.88FS)(1.1%)(6.85FS)(7.84FS)
PROP.UNDERGROUNDINFILTRATION BMP.SEE PWQMP/HYD
(1.1%)(6.77FS)
7.24TC
(6.74FS)
7.51FS-GB
(7.12FS)
1.53TC (1.1%)7.64FS
(1.03FS)2.03TC 9'
TYP.1.53FL
1.65FS
(2.88TC)2.43FS
7.22TC 8.16TC (8.12TC)(7.55FS)
1.36TC(0.88FS)
MATCH(7.01FS-GB)(7.68FS)(7.90FS) 18'
6'6'(6.72FS)
4.57TC 7.24TC (7.57FS)
(8.04TC)7.54FS
7.80FS
(7.83FS)(4.07FS)(4.16FS)(4.40FS)
(4.37FS)
(5.45FS)
(5.37FS)
(5.54FS)
(5.53FS)
(6.07FS)
(6.00FS)
(6.74FS)(7.00FS)
(7.29TC)
(6.82FS)MATCH(6.80FS)
7.36FS-GB (7.48FS)
7.48FS(2.92TC)
(2.47FS)
2.00TC
1.50FL1.62FS
4.48TC(3.98FS)
(4.08FS)
(7.26TC)(6.75FS)PROP. ADA
ACCESSIBLE PATHWAYTO PUBLIC ROW.RESTRIPE STALLS
(6.67FS)MATCH
(6.65FS)MATCH(7.94TC)(7.44FS)
DETAIL A: ADA PARKING
(8.47TC)
(7.21FS)IMPROVEMENTS
SCALE: 1":10'
DRAWN BY:AM CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN SHEET
CG-03
REVISIONS PLANS PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: AMA
DATE:
05/01/24
APP'V'D BENCHMARK:NUMBER DATE CAL BOXTHE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
ELEVATION :1117.66 05/01/2024 03 OF
04BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
AARON M. ALBERTSON
R.C.E. 65513, EXP. 9/30/25N 89°31'52"E
Page 15
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
WEST114 PL 114
112
110
108
106
104
102
100
12.6'
EXIST. DRIVEAISLE
18.0'
EXIST. PARKINGSTALL
28.3'
PROPOSEDLANDSCAPE
BUEIXLIDSITN.G1109.74FF112
110
108
106
104
102
100
1109.24FF1108.57FS
PROPOSEDBUILDINGEXPANSION1109.24FFEXISTINGPROPOSED
GRADE EXISTING WALLCONCRETETO BE REMOVEDGUTTER
(1104.12FL)(1104.22FS)
(1105.63TC)
(1105.13FS)EXISTING
GRADEEXISTING
GRADEEXISTING
GRADE
SECTION "A-A"
SCALE:1"=10'
NORTH
PL
118 0.6'118
116
19.2'
EXISTING
LANDSCAPE
23.6'
STORAGE
AREA
3.0'23.5'EXISTING
BUILDING
1110.86FF116
114
112
110
EXIST.
GUTTER
EXISTING
DRIVE AISLE
1111.46EG
EXISTINGGRADE
EXISTINGEDGE OFPAVEMENT
1110.40FL 114
112
110
1110.84FSEXISTINGGRADE1110.78EG 1110.53FS
1110.52FS
108
106
108
106
SECTION "B-B"
SCALE:1"=5'
EAST
PL118
116
1.9'
SIDEWALK
26.1'15.9'
EX.
LANDSCAPE
118
116
EXISTING
BUILDING
1110.31FF
EXISTING
DRIVE AISLE 1113.87EG
114
112
110
114
112
110
1110.44TC1111.09TC1110.67FS 1109.72FLEXISTINGGRADE
108
106
108
106
SECTION "C-C"
SCALE:1"=5'
116
114
51.2'EXISTING
STORAGE AREA
65.7'18.0'5.0'
ADA
PATH
OF
TRAVEL
8.0'24.6'19.9'5.9'
PL 116
114EXISTING
BUILDING
1109.15FF
EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING
DRIVE AISLE PARKING STALL LANDSCAPE DRIVE AISLE PARKING STALL LANDSCAPE
112
110
108
106
104
102
100
98
EXISTINGGRADE EXISTINGGRADE
112
110
108
106
104
102
100
98
1105.50 1105.63TC1105.45FL 1105.27TC
1104.88FS
1102.661105.52 FS EGFS1103.91TC1103.41FL
SECTION "D-D"
SCALE:1"=10'
DRAWN BY:AM SITE SECTIONS SHEET
CG-4
REVISIONS PLANS PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: AMA
DATE:
05/01/24
APP'V'D BENCHMARK:NUMBER DATE CAL BOX
8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.
ELEVATION :1117.66 05/01/2024 4 OF
04BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
AARON M. ALBERTSON
R.C.E. 65513, EXP. 9/30/25N 89°31'52"E
Page 16
EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT
LEGEND:ABBREVIATIONS:
(XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATIONEXISTING CONCRETE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
PROP. CONCRETE
PROP. LANDSCAPE
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING WALL
BOW
CF
ELEV
ELECEX
BACK OF WALK
CURB FACE
ELEVATION
ELECTRICALEXISTING
EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT TO
BE REMOVED EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT FF
FL
FINISH FLOOR
FLOW LINE
FG
FS
GB
INV
MAX
MHMIN
MWD
FINISH GRADE
FINISH SURFACE
GRADE BREAK
INVERT
MAXIMUM
MANHOLEMINIMUM
MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
XXXX
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE OC
TC
TG
TYP
W
ON CENTER
TOP OF CURB
TOP OF GRATE
TYPICAL
150' FIRE HOSE HOSE PULL
RADIUS
WIDTH
WM WATER METER
EXFIRPARCEL 27
PARCEL MAP NO, 6194
VICINITY MAPPROPOSED
BUILDING ADDITION
1109.24FF
EXISTING
BUILDING
PROJECT DATA:N.T.S.
CAL BOX WAREHOUSE EXPANSION
EXISTING GROSS BLDG AREA:
PROPOSED GROSS BLDG AREA:
TOTAL GROSS BLDG AREA:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
+-99,400 SF
+-47,000 SF
+-146,400 SF
TYPE-IIIB FULLY SPRINKLERED
150.0'
HOSE PULL EXISTING PRIVATE
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING PRIVATEFIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING 4" FIRESERVICE FH
EX. 8"
FIRE LINESERVICE DCDA
BACKFLOWPREVENTER
EXISTING PUBLIC
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING PRIVATE
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING 8" DCDA
DRAWN BY:AM FIRE ACCESS PLAN SHEET
FM-01
REVISIONS PLANS PREPARED BY:CHECKED BY: AMA
DATE:09/25/23
NUMBER DATE APP'V'D BENCHMARK:CAL BOXTHE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
ELEVATION :1117.66 09/25/2023 01 OF
01BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
AARON M. ALBERTSON
R.C.E. 65513, EXP. 9/30/19N 89°31'52"E
Page 17
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
LEGEND(S
(SMATCHLINE
REFER TO SHEET
MATCHLINE TAG: DESCRIPTION:
ITEM:
REMARKS&&#LP-02 REFER TO SHEET #LP-02 AIR MATCHLINE
REFER TO SHEET #LP-02 A INFILL / EXTEND / REPAIR EXISTING TURF AND
IRRIGATION BASED ON INSTALLATION OF NEW
WALKWAY
-&&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
(S FF 1110.32&&&WV FH
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
(S REPAIR / REPLACE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND TURF
BASED ON INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALK AND
CURB.
-BFF 1109.24
C
B
D
(S
(S C
D
EXISTING CANARY ISLAND PINES
- PROTECT-IN-PLACE
(S8"
(S
L&O&T L&T PLANTING AREA - INSTALL 3" DEEP LAYER OF
PLANTER MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AND IRRIGATION NOTES #3 THIS
REFER TO GENERAL PLANTING8.0'&&
&
&
&&AREA SHEET.&&4" P&IP&E (S FF 1110.55 EXISTING PLANTING AREA -" D E
F
&&
&&&&
&(S STRUCTURAL STEEL POST ON
CONCRETE PIER ON CONCRETE&&EXISTING TURF AREA -
&&&(S
&&PROPOSED LPG STATION RF 1145.25&&&(S G
H
J
PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WALKWAY
ADA PATH OF TRAVEL
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS
&&&FF 1109.12
FF 1109.04
RF 1147.77&&(S
&FF 1109.29&FF 1109.38&&&(S REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS&&
&&
&
&
(S&RD FF 1109.87
RF 1141.86
RF 1146.02
&
&(S
(S
RD DRIVE ISLE OR PARKING AREA
PARKING STALL
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS&
&
(S
&
&
4" TRENCH
DRN4" FIRE
8" FIRE
&(S (S (S (S (S
&&
&
&
&K
L
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F
5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F
2" BFP &&5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F
5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F&&EXTEND EXISTING IRRIGATION TO PROVIDE PROPER
COVERAGE FOR NEW LANDSCAPE AREA
-
-
-
&&5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F
SMH &&
&&
&
&&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&&&&
&
&
&
&&&&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&&M
N
REPAIR / REPLACE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND
IRRIGATION BASED ON INSTALLATION OF NEW CURB&&&&&&&ESCO
WM
&&
&
&&
&&
&&LO& T& L&T FF 1110.16 REPAIR / REPLACE EXISTING TURF, LANDSCAPE AND
IRRIGATION AS REQUIRED BASED ON INSTALLATION
OF NEW ADA RAMP
SMH &
&
&&&&
&
&
&
&&WM &&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&&
STLT N N
D
M 3/$17ꢀ6&+('8/(ꢀ/3ꢃꢂ
(;,67,1*ꢀ3$/06 47<%27$1,&$/ꢀꢉꢀ&20021ꢀ1$0(5(0$5.6
(;,67,1*ꢊ6<$*586ꢀ520$1=2)),$1$
48((1ꢀ3$/0
F F E JK
G ꢂꢈ:$6+,1*721,$ꢀ52%867$
0(;,&$1ꢀ)$1ꢀ3$/0
(;,67,1*
5(0$5.6
D L SIGNAGATE E
FH B G H (;,67,1*ꢀ75((6 47<
ꢊ
%27$1,&$/ꢀꢉꢀ&20021ꢀ1$0(WV %5$&+<&+,721ꢀ;ꢀꢋ0$-(67,&ꢀ%($87<ꢋ
0$-(67,&ꢀ%($87<ꢀ%277/(ꢀ75((
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
5F
5F
SIGN SIGN K
F FH
ꢈ
ꢌ
&,11$02080ꢀ&$03+25$
&$03+25ꢀ75((
SMH LOT LT LOT LT /$*(56752(0,$ꢀ,1',&$
&5$3(ꢀ0<57/(LOT LT LOT LTB
F
GTE BX
ꢇ0$*12/,$ꢀ*5$1',)/25$
6287+(51ꢀ0$*12/,$E E E E E
J ꢂꢆ
ꢂ
3,186ꢀ&$1$5,(16,6
&$1$5<ꢀ,6/$1'ꢀ3,1(F E E
V
V
3,186ꢀ+$/(3(16,6
$//(32ꢀ3,1(
PROPERTY LINE
SMH PROPERTY LINE
GENERAL PLANTING AND IRRIGATION NOTES:3/$17ꢀ6&+('8/(ꢀ/3ꢃꢂ
6+58%6 47<%27$1,&$/ꢀꢉꢀ&20021ꢀ1$0(:8&2/6
/
6,=(5(0$5.6
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PHOTOS OF EACH VARIETY OF PLANT MATERIAL. FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY OWNER
AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PHOTOS SHALL SHOW THE REPRESENTATIVE SIZE, QUALITY, AND CHARACTER OF EACH
VARIETY.
&ꢌꢂꢌ&$5,66$ꢀ0$&52&$53$ꢀꢋ*5((1ꢀ&$53(7ꢋ
*5((1ꢀ&$53(7ꢀ1$7$/ꢀ3/80
ꢂꢀ*$/ꢍ
ꢅꢀ*$/ꢍ
ꢅꢀ*$/ꢍ
#ꢀꢊCꢁꢃꢎꢀ2ꢍ&ꢍ
2.
3.
4.
5.
THE QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING LEGEND ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL
BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL AS DRAWN OR CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
ꢌꢂ
ꢈꢏ
(/$($*186ꢀ381*(16
7+251<ꢀ(/$($*186
/ꢀꢉꢀ0
/
#ꢀꢆCꢁꢃꢎꢀ2ꢍ&ꢍ
#ꢀꢏCꢁꢃꢎꢀ2ꢍ&ꢍ
RAIL ROAD
(S
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 3" DEEP LAYER OF PLANTER MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS.
SUBMIT SAMPLE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
NEW WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON AUTOMATED TIMERS AND SENSORS SHALL BE USED AND
ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WATER USE PROHIBITIONS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS.
5+$3+,2/(3,6ꢀ,1',&$ꢀꢋ&/$5$ꢋ
&/$5$ꢀ,1',$1ꢀ+$:7+2515F NORTH
AREA
SOUTH
AREA
Under Ground
Service Alert
of Southern California0102040
CONTACT811 KEY MAPScale: 1"=20'TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG N.T.S.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: BH
DATE:
09/25/23
APP'V'D BENCHMARK:
PC /$1'6&$3(ꢀ&21&(37ꢀ3/$17,1*ꢀ3/$1ꢀꢁꢀ6287+SHEETREVISIONS%UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD 09/25/2023
BRANDON HANNA, RLA EXP. 9/30/25 DATENUMBERDATE /3ꢁ2ꢂ
2 OF 03
09/25/23 AGENCY SUBMITTAL THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.
%UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD 8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
ELEVATION : 1117.66
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
16672 Millikan Avenue T: (949) 224-0040
www.missionlandscape.comIrvine, CA 92606N 89°31'52"E
Page 18
LEGEND
TAG: DESCRIPTION:
ITEM:
REMARKS
GTE MH
A NOT ASSIGNED -
SD M
B REPAIR / REPLACE EXISTING LANDSCAPE BASED ON
INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALK AND CURB.
-
RAILROAD SPUR PP C
D
EXISTING CANARY ISLAND PINES
- PROTECT-IN-PLACEFH
WV
PP
PLANTING AREA - INSTALL 3" DEEP LAYER OF
PLANTER MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AND IRRIGATION NOTES #3 THIS
AREA
REFER TO GENERAL PLANTINGEDIS
K RA
FH SHEET.
EXISTING PLANTING -E
CONCRETE SWALE NOT ASSIGNED -F
G
H
J
P
PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WALKWAY
NOT ASSIGNED
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS
V D
GAT GA E
&(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
285.4'&
&FF 1110.86 FF 1111.43 DRIVE ISLE OR PARKING AREA
PARKING STALL
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS&&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
FF 1111.86&&FF 1111.40&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS&&
&
&
&
&
&
K
L&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
NOT ASSIGNED -B
O
G
NOT ASSIGNED -M
N
O
P
FIRE SERVICE E
NOT ASSIGNED -LOADING DOCK&
&&&&P NEW STEPS WITH HANDRAIL
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PLANS
-
FF 1111.75
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&(S
(S
(S
B
C
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
FF 1110.20
FF 1110.12
UTILITY MH
CO
G
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&&&
LO&T LT& (S&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
(S
STRUCTURAL STEEL
POST ON CONCRETE WV FH
FF 1109.99J
K
4" FIRE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
FF 1111.30 CO
&
&
&
& & & &
&
& & & &
& &
PARCEL 27
PARCEL MAP NO, 6194C
D
FF 1109.74 3/$17ꢀ6&+('8/(ꢀ/3ꢃꢌ
(;,67,1*ꢀ75((6 47<%27$1,&$/ꢀꢉꢀ&20021ꢀ1$0(5(0$5.6
(;,67,1*ꢌ%5$&+<&+,721ꢀ;ꢀꢋ0$-(67,&ꢀ%($87<ꢋ
0$-(67,&ꢀ%($87<ꢀ%277/(ꢀ75((
FIRE SERVICE ꢂꢆ3,186ꢀ&$1$5,(16,6
&$1$5<ꢀ,6/$1'ꢀ3,1(
(;,67,1*
B
O
G
STRUCTURAL STEEL POST ON
CONCRETE PIER ON CONCRETE AIR
E
RAIL ROAD&
&&&&&AIR
NORTH
AREA&M&AT&CH&LIN&E &&
&
(S
(S
MATCHLINE
REFER TO SHEET # LP-01
FF 1110.3 WV FHMATCHLINE
REFER TO SHEET # LP-01
REFER TO SHEET #LP-01
&&
&&&&FF 1109 24
3/$17ꢀ6&+('8/(ꢀ/3ꢃꢌSOUTH
AREA6+58%6 47<%27$1,&$/ꢀꢉꢀ&20021ꢀ1$0(:8&2/6
/
6,=(5(0$5.6
ꢌꢈꢏ&$5,66$ꢀ0$&52&$53$ꢀꢋ*5((1ꢀ&$53(7ꢋ
*5((1ꢀ&$53(7ꢀ1$7$/ꢀ3/80
ꢂꢀ*$/ꢍ#ꢀꢊCꢁꢃꢎꢀ2ꢍ&ꢍ&Under Ground
Service Alert0102040of Southern California
ꢏꢌ(/$($*186ꢀ381*(16
7+251<ꢀ(/$($*186
/ꢀꢉꢀ0 ꢅꢀ*$/ꢍ#ꢀꢆCꢁꢃꢎꢀ2ꢍ&ꢍCONTACT(S 811 KEY MAPScale: 1"=20'TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG N.T.S.
DRAWN BY:PC /$1'6&$3(ꢀ&21&(37ꢀSHEETREVISIONSCHECKED BY: BH %UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD 3/$17,1*ꢀ3/$1ꢀꢁꢀ1257+09/25/2023
BRANDON HANNA, RLA EXP. 9/30/25 DATEDATE:09/25/23
NUMBER DATE
09/25/23 AGENCY SUBMITTAL
APP'V'D BENCHMARK:
THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.
%UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD 8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
/3ꢁ2ꢌ
2 OF 03ELEVATION : 1117.66
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
16672 Millikan Avenue T: (949) 224-0040
www.missionlandscape.comIrvine, CA 92606N 89°31'52"E
Page 19
CARISSA MACROCARPA 'GREEN CARPET'
DWARF NATAL PLUM
ELAEAGNUS PUNGENS
THORNY ELAEAGNUS
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'CLARA'
INDIAN HAWTHORN
DRAWN BY:PC /$1'6&$3(ꢀ&21&(37ꢀ3/$17,1*ꢀ,0$*(5<SHEETREVISIONSCHECKED BY: BH %UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD
BRANDON HANNA, RLA EXP. 9/30/25
09/25/2023
DATEDATE:09/25/23
NUMBER DATE
09/25/23 AGENCY SUBMITTAL
APP'V'D BENCHMARK:
THE BENCHMARK FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FIELD NOTES FOR THE
M.W.D. WATER LINE, PROJECT NAME CLEVELAND AVE, IN BOOK 4014,
PAGE 700 DATED 10-7-74.
%UDQGRQꢀ+DQQD 8949 TORONTO AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
APN: 0209-401-05-0000
/3,ꢁ2ꢂ
3 OF 03ELEVATION : 1117.66
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 6194 ALSO CALLED OUT AS EIGHT STREET.,
16672 Millikan Avenue
Irvine, CA 92606
T: (949) 224-0040
www.missionlandscape.comN 89°31'52"E
Page 20
ꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
6,7(ꢀ3/$1ꢀ/(*(1'
127ꢀ,1ꢀ6&23(
6,7(ꢀ:$/.ꢀ3$9,1*
ꢇꢉꢇꢉꢀ6DQꢀ)HOLSHꢀ6Wꢐꢀ6XLWHꢀꢉꢏꢅꢅ
+RXVWRQꢃꢀ7;ꢀꢀꢏꢏꢅꢇꢆ
ꢏꢉꢈꢋꢆꢆꢅꢋꢆꢉꢅꢎ/$1'6&$3,1*ꢀꢌꢀ*5$66
ZZZꢐJRUHHꢐFRP'(6,*1$7('ꢀ),5(ꢀ$&&(66ꢀ/$1(
&2168/7$176
:$5(+286(ꢀꢌꢀ6725$*(ꢀꢋ ꢆꢇꢃꢉꢎꢆꢀ6)&,9,/
&'5(
'
&
%
$
ꢆꢁꢇꢀ72:1ꢀ&(17(5ꢀ'5,9(ꢃꢀ68,7(ꢀꢉꢉꢅ
&267$ꢀ0(6$ꢃꢀ&$ꢀꢁꢎꢆꢎꢆ
ꢁꢄꢁꢋꢈꢇꢉꢋꢇꢈꢎꢇ
0$18)$&785,1*ꢀ(48,30(17ꢀꢋ ꢉꢇꢃꢂꢎꢅꢀ6)
:::ꢐ&'5:(67ꢐ&20,1'8675,$/ꢀ0$18)$&785,1*ꢀꢋ ꢎꢅꢃꢄꢇꢉꢀ6)
2)),&(ꢀ63$&(ꢀꢋ ꢇꢃꢇꢂꢇꢀ6)
6758&785$/
'$//<ꢈ$662&,$7(6
ꢁꢂꢅꢅꢀ5,&+021'ꢀ$9(18(ꢃꢀ68,7(ꢀꢄꢆꢅ
+286721ꢃꢀ7;ꢀꢏꢏꢅꢄꢎ
ꢏꢉꢈꢋꢈꢈꢏꢋꢂꢂꢂꢉ
'$//<$662&,$7(6ꢐ&20
3523(57<ꢀ/,1(ꢇꢈꢉꢊꢀꢋꢀꢁꢀꢉꢌꢄꢍ3523(57<ꢀ/,1(
75$,/(5ꢀ3$5.,1*0(3
*.ꢉ(1*,1((56
ꢇꢁꢇꢁꢀ:ꢀ/223ꢀ6ꢃꢀ68,7(ꢀꢈꢇꢅ
%(//$,5ꢃꢀ7;ꢀꢏꢏꢄꢅꢉ
ꢏꢉꢈꢋꢁꢂꢂꢋꢂꢂꢁꢄ)+352326('ꢀ),5(ꢀ+<'5$17
+26(ꢀ/$<
*.ꢋ0(3ꢐ&20
3523(57<ꢀ/,1(
ꢆꢈꢊꢀꢋꢀꢆꢍ
'183 6,7(ꢀ3/$1ꢀ*(1(5$/ꢀ127(6
ꢈꢀ36
(;,67,1*ꢀ7,/7:$//
%8,/',1*3523(57<ꢀ/,1(352-(&7ꢀ1$0(
ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢀ6)&$/ꢀ%2;ꢀ,,
:$5(+286(
(;3$16,21
:$5(+286(ꢀꢌꢀ6725$*(ꢀꢋ ꢆꢇꢃꢉꢎꢆꢀ6)
0$18)$&785,1*ꢀ(48,30(17ꢀꢋ ꢉꢇꢃꢂꢎꢅꢀ6)
,1'8675,$/ꢀ0$18)$&785,1*ꢀꢋ ꢎꢅꢃꢄꢇꢉꢀ6)
2)),&(ꢀ63$&(ꢀꢋ ꢇꢃꢇꢂꢇꢀ6)352-(&7ꢀ'(6&5,37,21
$'',7,21ꢀ2)ꢀ(;,67,1*
:$5(+286(75$,/(5ꢀ3$5.,1*
ꢁꢀ36 352-(&7ꢀ$''5(66
ꢂꢁꢄꢁꢀ7252172ꢀ$9(18(ꢃ
5$1&+2ꢀ&8&$021*$ꢃ
&$ꢃꢁꢉꢏꢈꢅ
352326('ꢀ7,/7:$//
(;3$16,21
ꢄꢇꢃꢁꢁꢈꢀ6)
180%(5ꢀ2)ꢀ3$5.,1*ꢀ63$&(6ꢀ5(48,5('ꢀ3(5ꢀ7$%/(ꢀꢉꢏꢐꢆꢄꢐꢅꢇꢅꢀꢋ 3$5.,1*ꢀ5(48,5(0(176ꢀ%<ꢀ/$1'ꢀ86(2:1(5ꢀ,1)250$7,21
&$/ꢀ%2;ꢀ,,ꢎꢅꢊꢀꢋꢀꢅꢍ(;,67,1*ꢀ:$5(+286(ꢀꢌꢀ
6725$*(ꢀ
ꢉꢀ3(5ꢀꢉꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)ꢀ)25ꢀ),567ꢀꢎꢅꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ
6)ꢑꢀꢉꢀ3(5ꢀꢎꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)ꢀ)25ꢀ1(;7ꢀ
ꢎꢅꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)ꢑꢀ$1'ꢀꢉꢀ3(5ꢀꢄꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)ꢀ
)25ꢀ7+(ꢀ5(0$,1,1*ꢀ6)ꢐ
ꢆꢇꢃꢉꢎꢆꢀꢋ ),567ꢀꢎꢅꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ ꢀꢎꢅꢀ36
ꢄꢇꢃꢉꢎꢇꢀꢋ 6(&21'ꢀꢎꢅꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ ꢀꢉꢅꢀ36
ꢎꢇꢃꢉꢎꢇꢀ5(0$,1,1*ꢀ ꢀꢆꢀ36
ꢈꢆꢀ36ꢀ727$/
,1'8675,$/ꢀ0$18)$&785,1*
2)),&(ꢀ63$&(
ꢎꢀ3(5ꢀꢉꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)
ꢄꢀ3(5ꢀꢉꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)
ꢉꢀ3(5ꢀꢄꢃꢅꢅꢅꢀ6)ꢀ
ꢉꢉꢃꢏꢏꢁꢀ6)ꢀ ꢀꢎꢄꢀ36ꢀ727$/
ꢇꢃꢇꢂꢇꢀ6)ꢀ ꢀꢎꢎꢀ36ꢀ727$/
ꢄꢄꢃꢂꢉꢅꢀ6) ꢀꢉꢎꢀ36ꢀ727$/352326('ꢀ
:$5(+286(ꢀꢌꢀ6725$*(ꢀꢁꢀ36
727$/ꢀ3$5.,1*ꢀ63$&(6ꢀꢒ36ꢓꢀ5(48,5('
727$/ꢀ3$5.,1*ꢀ63$&(6ꢀꢒ36ꢓꢀ3529,'('
ꢁꢄꢀ36ꢀ727$/
ꢉꢅꢈꢀ36ꢀ727$/
ꢆꢅꢊꢀꢋꢀꢎꢀꢉꢌꢂꢍ
ꢈꢀ36 6,7(ꢀ3/$1ꢀ.(<('ꢀ127(6
*25((ꢀ352-(&7ꢀ180%(5
&ꢎꢎꢅꢁꢆ
'1 67$03ꢀꢌꢀ6,*1$785(
5/3(*/2ꢀ6&
7
$
$
7
7
('ꢀ
,21
ꢇꢊꢀꢋꢀꢅꢍꢉꢄꢊꢀꢋꢀꢅꢍ6,7(ꢀ3/$1ꢀ.(<('ꢀ127(6
$ꢀ
$6ꢀꢁꢂ7<3(
&86720(5
(03/2<((
6(59,&(
63$&(6
'1 ꢉꢇ
ꢉꢇ
ꢏꢅ
ꢎ
(;,67,1* ꢀ),5(ꢀ/$1(
,668(ꢀ+,6725<$'$ꢀ3$5.,1*
727$/
'$7(ꢔ
ꢅꢆꢌꢉꢂꢌꢎꢅꢎꢄ
0$5.ꢔ'(6&5,37,21ꢔ
'(6,*1ꢀ5(9,(:ꢉꢅꢎ
'6&(&2255('$7ꢀ&,92(1ꢀ3&$59(,17(*
3523(57<ꢀ/,1(
3$5.,1*ꢀ$1$/<6,6
ꢁꢅꢊꢀꢋꢀꢆꢍ
ꢇꢀ36
ꢆꢀ36 ꢉꢎꢀ36 3523(57<ꢀ/,1(
ꢂꢅꢊꢀꢋꢀꢉꢉꢍꢂꢉꢊꢀꢋꢀꢆꢀꢈꢌꢂꢍꢁꢅꢊꢀꢋꢀꢎꢀꢈꢌꢂꢍ
.(<ꢀ3/$1
++++++
6+((7ꢀ1$0(
$5&+,7(&785$/ꢀ6,7(ꢀ3/$1
1 6+((7ꢀ180%(5
$6ꢂꢇꢂ29(5$//ꢀ6,7(ꢀ3/$1
6&$/(ꢔ ꢂꢊꢄꢃꢋꢀ ꢀꢂꢌꢉꢇꢋ$ꢉ
ꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Page 21
6DQ)HOLSH6W6X
LWH
+RXVWRQ7;
ZZZJRUHHFRP
&2168/7$176
&,9,/
&'5(
'
&
%
$
(
'
&
%
$
72:1&(17(5'5,9(68,7(
&267$0(6$&$
:::&'5:(67&20
6758&785$/
'$//<$662&,$7(6
5,&+021'$9(18(68,7(
+2867217;
'$//<$662&,$7(6&20
0(3
*.(1*,1((56
:/223668,7(
%(//$,57;
*.0(3&20
352-(&71$0(
&$/%2;,,
:$5(+286(
(;3$16,21
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
$'',7,212)(;,67,1*
:$5+286(
352-(&7$''5(66
7252172$9(18(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$
&$
2:1(5,1)250$7,21
&$/%2;,,
(;,67,1**$7(
*25((352-(&7180%(5
&
67$036,*1$785(
$
$6,668(+,6725<
'$7(0$5.'(6&5,37,21
'(6,*15(9,(:
'(&25$7,9(3$9,1*
6&25('&21&5(7(
.(<3/$1
$''('5(48,5('3(5&(179,(:
2%6&855,1*0(7$/%$&.,1*
(;,67,1*(175$1&(*$7(
(;,67,1*)(1&(
&$/%2;,,
6+((71$0(
6,7('(7$,/6
6+((7180%(5
$629(5$//6,7(3/$1 (175$1&(*$7(
6&$/(
(175$1&(*$7(
$$6&$/(
Page 22
)/2253/$1/(*(1'
127,1&2175$&7
%8,/',1*&25((/(0(176
6DQ)HOLSH6W6X
LWH
+RXVWRQ7;
(;,67,1*0,//:25.725(0$,1
,1',&$7(60,//:25.72%('(02/,6+('ZZZJRUHHFRP
(;,67,1*&216758&7,21725(0$,1 &2168/7$176
(;,67,1*&216758&7,2172%('(02/,6+('&,9,/
&'5(
'
&
%
$
72:1&(17(5'5,9(68,7(
&267$0(6$&$
(;,67,1*'225725(0$,1
(;,67,1*'22572%(5(029(':::&'5:(67&20
6758&785$/
'$//<$662&,$7(6
5,&+021'$9(18(68,7(
+2867217;
'$//<$662&,$7(6&20
)/2253/$1*(1(5$/127(6
$ *&72),(/'9(5,)<&21',7,216%()25(352&((',1*$1',1)250$5&+,7(&7
$1'7(1$1765(35(6(17$7,9(2)$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6
0(3
*.(1*,1((56
:/223668,7(
%(//$,57;
% $//',0(16,216$5(72)$&(2)*:%(;&/86,9(2)$33/,('),1,6+(6
7<3,&$/81/(66127('27+(5:,6(
& ,1',0(16,21675,1*6$,1',&$7(6$',0(16,2172%(),(/'9(5,),('
$)7(57+(5(0$,1'(52)7+(675,1*,6/$,'287127,)<$5&+,7(&72)$1<
6,*1,),&$17',0(16,21$/',6&5(3$1&,(6*5($7(57+$1
*.0(3&20
(;(;'(;(;(;(;(;$
'1
' $//:22'%/2&.,1*6+$//%(),5(5(7$5'$1775($7('72&21)250727+(
),5(5(6,67,9(67$1'$5'62)7+(/2&$/-85,6',&7,21+$9,1*$87+25,7<
83 (;$(
$//)/22566+$//%(/(9(/('72,12572,1'8675<67$1'$5'
)/22566+$//%(),//('$1'6:(37%5220&/($1) *&729(5,)<&21',7,212)(;,67,1*:,1'2:75($70(1765(3/$&('$0$*('
250,66,1*:,7+1(:720$7&+$//:,1'2:75($70(176$5(72%(
&216,67(17:,7+,1($&+522083
3$57,7,216
* 5()(5726+((7;;;;)253$57,7,217<3(6$1'$'',7,21$/127(6
+ $//1(:3$57,7,216$5(6+2:16+$'('$1'81/(66127('27+(5:,6(21
3/$1$5(7<3($25(5()(572/(*(1')256+$',1*7<3(62
7+(5
3$57,7,217<3(:+,&+0$<%(&$//('287217+(3/$1683(56('(7+(
6+$',1*6+2:1$77+$7/2&$7,215()(5727+,66+((721/<)25:$//
6+$',1*7<3(6, :+(5(1(:3$57,7,216-2,1(;,67,1*&2175$&725729(5,)<(;,67,1*
3$57,7,217+,&.1(66$1'0$7&+1(:72(;,67,1*
- 9(5,)<(;,67,1*&20021&255,'25$1'$'-$&(177(1$17:$//6(;7(1'72
81'(56,'(2)6758&785($%29(,)127(;7(1'(;,67,1*:$//672
6758&785($%29(5(3$57,7,217<3(.(;%
(;&
(;'
(;(
(;)
(;*
352-(&71$0(
. $//,17(5,25*/$=,1*6<67(0672%(085$)/(;),12812&217$&7)5$1.
%5812#7(;$6,17(5,256)2535,&,1*
&$/%2;,,
:$5(+286(
(;3$16,21
352326('7,/7:$//
(;3$16,21
(;,67,1*7,/7:$//
%8,/',1*
6
)
6
)'2256
/ 5()(5726+((7;;;;)25'225)5$0($1'+$5':$5(6&+('8/(6$1'
5(63216,%,/,7,(6$1'$'',7,21$/127(6&225',1$7(:,7+),1,6+(6
63(&,),&$7,216$//'225-$0%672%(6(7)520,17(56(&7,1*3$57,7,216
7<3,&$/812
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
$'',7,212)(;,67,1*
:$5+286(0 $//1(:255(86(''2256$1')5$0(6720$7&+(;,67,1*'2256$1'
)5$0(6:,7+,1/($6(63$&(812(9$/8$7('2256)255(86(*&72728&+
83$65(48,5('72%(,1*72/,.(1(:&21',7,21$//'2256:,7+/2&.6(76
12786('72%(3$7&+(':,7+0(7$/%/$1.6,)1(&(66$5<,)'225
81'(5&876(;&(('$))*&6+$//&217$&7$5&+,7(&7,125'(572
'(7(50,1(,)&255(&7,9($&7,21,65(48,5('
352-(&7$''5(66
7252172$9(18(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$
&$
1 $//+$5':$5(6+$//%(/(9(57<3(812*&729(5,)<&203/(7(1(662)$//
/$7&+6(76$1'/2&.6(76)255(86($1'3529,'(0,66,1*&20321(176$6
5(48,5('
3/80%,1*2:1(5,1)250$7,21
&$/%2;,,2 *&729(5,)<23(5$7,21$/&21',7,212)$//(;,67,1*3/80%,1*725(0$,1
$1'&21',7,212)$662&,$7('0,//:25.$1'5(3$,5$65(48,5('
3 $//1(:)$8&(7672%((48,33(':,7+$'$$33529(':5,67%/$'(681/(66
+$1'6)5(('(9,&(,663(&,),('
4 $//3/80%,1*,15(7851$,53/(18072%(&$67,521$63(5/2&$/
-85,6',&7,21+$9,1*$87+25,7<
&
$0,//:25.
5 *&72(;$0,1(&21',7212)$//(;,67,1*0,//:25.$1'5(3$,572
$&&(37$%/(&21',7,21
6 6&5,%($//0,//:25.72$'-$&(17685)$&(6$65(48,5('
7 3529,'(),5(5(7$5'$17%/2&.,1*,13$57,7,216$7:$//02817('
(48,30(17$1'0,//:25.
8 :+(10,//:25.$%8776$3$57,7,217+(3$57,7,216+$//(;7(1'%(<21'
7+(('*(2)7+(0,//:25.
)/922&21755$&3725/7$201$7&+.6,(/,&<21((&'517220,/7/:(25.),1,6+(66
*25((352-(&7180%(5
&
67$036,*1$785(
,668(+,6725<
'$7(0$5.'(6&5,37,21
'(6,*15(9,(:
*(;,67,1*
2)),&(6
55
55
$
$
'1
(;+
(;,
$/,*1
.(<3/$1
'1
&/&/&/
%
$1
6+((71$0(
29(5$//)/2253/$1
6+((7180%(51$29(5$//)/2253/$1
6&$/( $
Page 23
522)3/$1/(*(1'
'(127(6578=21(
'(127(67$3(5(',168/$7,21
3(5)76/23(6DQ)HOLSH6W6X
LWH
+RXVWRQ7;
)8785(3$5.,1*
35(),1,6+('35()$%5,&$7('
$12',=('$/80,180&$123<ZZZJRUHHFRP
723 7232)3$5$3(7
'6 5(&(66(''2:163287 &2168/7$176
&,9,/
&'5(
'
&
%
$
522)3/$1*(1(5$/127(6 72:1&(17(5'5,9(68,7(
&267$0(6$&$
:::&'5:(67&20
$ *&72&225',1$7(:,7+0(&+$1,&$/6&5((10$18)$&785(521/2&$7,212)
0(&+$1,&$/6&5((1326765()(5726758&785$/)25%5$&,1*6758&785$/
'$//<$662&,$7(6
5,&+021'$9(18(68,7(
+2867217;
'$//<$662&,$7(6&20
% 5()(5720(&+$1,&$/(/(&75,&$/$1'3/80%,1*)2527+(5522)(48,30(17
& 3/$&(522):$/.3$'$73(5,0(7(52)0(&+$1,&$/(48,30(17522)
+$7&+(6$1'75$9(/5287(6)520522)/$''(56
0(3
*.(1*,1((56
:/223668,7(
%(//$,57;
522)3/$1.(<('127(6
(;(;(;(;(;(;(;*.0(3&20
(;$
(;%
(;&
(;'
(;(
(;)
(;*
352-(&71$0(
&$/%2;,,
:$5(+286(
(;3$16,21
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
$'',7,212)(;,67,1*
:$5+286(
352-(&7$''5(66
7252172$9(18(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$
&$
2:1(5,1)250$7,21
&$/%2;,,
(;,67,1*7,/7:$//
%8,/',1*
*25((352-(&7180%(5
&
67$036,*1$785(
,668(+,6725<
'$7(0$5.'(6&5,37,21
'(6,*15(9,(:
*
(;+
(;,
.(<3/$1
1
6+((71$0(
29(5$//522)3/$1
6+((7180%(5
1 $29(5$//522)3/$1
6&$/( $
Page 24
(;7(5,250$7(5,$//(*(1'
62/,' :+,7( *(1(5$/3$,1729(5&21&5(7(
)250/,1(5 9(57,&$/6DQ)HOLSH6W6X
LWH
+RXVWRQ7;
*/$=,1* 9,6,21
ZZZJRUHHFRP
(;,67,1*%8,/',1*
&2168/7$176
&,9,/
&'5(
'
&
%
$
(
'
&
%
$
72:1&(17(5'5,9(68,7(
&267$0(6$&$
(/(9$7,21.(<('127(6
:::&'5:(67&20
6758&785$/
'$//<$662&,$7(6
5,&+021'$9(18(68,7(
+2867217;
'$//<$662&,$7(6&20
0(3
*.(1*,1((56
:/223668,7(
%(//$,57;
(;(;(;(;(;(;(;*.0(3&20
3$5$3(7%
3$5$3(7$
*5281')/225
352-(&71$0(758&.&2857
29(5$//1257+(/(9$7,21
6&$/(
&$/%2;,,
:$5(+286(
(;3$16,21
'
(;$(;%(;&(;'(;((;)(;**(;+
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
$'',7,212)(;,67,1*
:$5+286(
352-(&7$''5(66
3$5$3(7%
7252172$9(18(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$
&$3$5$3(7$
2:1(5,1)250$7,21
&$/%2;,,
*5281/'()/2/25
29(5$//:(67(/(9$7,21&6&$/(
(;(;(;(;(;(;(;
&/
0$7&+(;,67,1*
*25((352-(&7180%(5
&3$5$3(7%
67$036,*1$785(
3$5$3(7$
,668(+,6725<
*5281/'()9 /(2/2 5'$7(0$5.'(6&5,37,21
'(6,*15(9,(:
758&.&2857
29(5$//6287+(/(9$7,21
6&$/( %
(;,(;+*(;*(;)(;((;'(;&(;%(;$
3$5$3(7%
3$5$3(7$
.(<3/$1
*5281')/225
29(5$//(/(9$7,21 ($67 1$6&$/(
6+((71$0(
29(5$//%8,/',1*
(/(9$7,216
6+((7180%(5
$6287+:(67&251(572:(5
6&$/($
Page 25
ꢃꢍꢃꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢌ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢏꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢂꢌꢍꢂꢌꢍꢄꢌꢍꢈ
WP-NEW WP-NEW WP-EX WP-EX WP-EX WP-EX WP-EX WP-EX
WP-EX
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
WP-NEW
WP-NEW
WP-NEW
WP-EX
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢈ
RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
ꢌꢍꢇ
WP-EX
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢆ
WꢌPꢍ-ꢇEX ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢆ
WP-EXꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢄ
WP-EX
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
WP-EꢌXꢍꢊꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍPꢌL-1
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
WPꢌ-ꢍꢄEX ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
WꢌꢍPꢄ-EX
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍWꢄ P-EX ꢌꢍꢊꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢄ WP-EXꢌꢍꢅꢌꢍꢂ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
WP-EꢌXꢍꢅꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢌ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
WPꢌ-ꢍꢏEX ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢆ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢏꢍꢃ
ꢌꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢇ
ꢌꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢌꢍꢊ
ꢌꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢈ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢊ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢄ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢂꢍꢏ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢈꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢏ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
PL-ꢍ1ꢈ
ꢂ
ꢂꢍꢄ
ꢂꢍꢅ
ꢂꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢃꢍꢆ
ꢃꢍꢅ
ꢃꢍꢊ
PL-1 PL-1
ꢃꢍꢌ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢂ
ꢂꢍꢆ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢃ
ꢃꢍꢇ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢈ
ꢂꢍꢊ
ꢂꢍꢂ
ꢃꢍꢇꢃꢍꢃ
Designer
Date
02/06/2024
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.
Plan View
Scale 1" 20ft
Summary
-=
Page 26
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
October 1, 2024
6:00 p.m.
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – GORRE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX - A request for site plan and architectural review of
45,993 square foot addition to an existing 98,406 square foot industrial building and a Conditional
Use Permit to operate a manufacturing use over 50,000 square feet located on approximately 7.7
acres of land within Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone, located on the east side of Toronto Avenue
where it terminates into the BNSF/Metrolink right of way; APN: 0209-401-05. (Design Review
DRC2023-00379 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288). The project qualifies as a Class
32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects.
Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the terminus of Toronto Avenue and is
developed with a 98,406 square foot industrial building. The parcel is approximately 532 feet from
east to west and 613 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 336,283 square feet
(7.7 acres). The right-of-way improvements (including landscaping, and utility undergrounding
along Toronto Avenue have been installed and will remain as part of this project.
The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent
properties are as follows:
Project Overview: The applicant proposes constructing a 45,993 square foot addition on the west
side of the existing 98,406 square foot industrial building that is used manufacturing purposes.
The addition will be used to store raw material and finished goods related to the main
manufacturing use. While the proposed use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit pursuant
to Development Code Section 17.136.010 (Allowed Land Uses), the existing building on the site
is non-conforming in terms of street side setbacks. Development Code Section 17.62.030-B
(Alteration and Additions to Nonconforming Uses and Structures) states that “(n)o nonconforming
structure shall be altered or reconstructed that results in an increase of the discrepancy between
existing conditions and the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard or height of structures,
distances between structures, and parking facilities…”. The proposed building addition will reduce
the discrepancy between current conditions and the required setbacks as the addition will bring
the overall building closer to the street.
The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction and designed to match the existing
building including the use of form lines and high windows. Two-story glazing has been added to
the southwest corner of the addition to create visual interest, along with new landscaping along
the west and south elevations and decorative paving at the main vehicle entrance. The
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
North BNSF/Metrolink
Right of Way - Industrial Employment (IE)
South Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
East Vacant Land City Center Center 2 (CE2)
West Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
Exhibit C
Page 27
DRC COMMENTS
DRC2023-00379 – GORRE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
October 1, 2024
Page 2
landscaping in the existing parking lot area has been enhanced to meet current landscape
requirements. The existing and new loading areas, dock doors and trailer parking stalls are
located on the north and south elevations of the building and screened from public view by an
existing wall and by the building.
The project was designed to bring the site into closer conformance with development standards
of the Mixed Employment 2 (Zone) including building and parking setbacks, number of parking
spaces, and floor area ratio as shown on the following tables:
Required Provided Compliant?
Building Setback (Street) 15 Feet Maximum 78 Feet Yes
Building Setback (Side) N/A 40 and 50 Feet Yes
Building Setback (Rear) N/A 135 Feet Yes
Parking Setback 10 Foot Minimum 81 Feet Yes
Landscape Coverage N/A 10.8 Percent Yes
Floor Area Ratio .4 – 2.0 Percent 43 Percent Yes
Building Height 4 Stories 1 Story Yes
Parking:
Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking
Office Parking
(5,585 SF) 1:250 SF 22 Spaces 22 Spaces
Manufacturing
(11,779 SF) 2:1,000 SF 24 Space 24 Space
Warehouse Parking
(180,186 SF)
1:1,000 for 1st 20,000 SF
1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF
1:4,000 for the Remaining SF
48 Spaces 48 Spaces
Total Vehicle Parking 94 Spaces 103 Spaces
Trailer Parking
(11 Dock High Doors) 1 per Dock High Door 11 Spaces 11 Spaces
Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the proposed addition to the existing industrial building.
The building is designed to be architecturally compatible with the existing building and onsite
improvements. The building addition will reduce the current non-conforming street setback by
bringing the overall building closer to the public street. Staff requests that the Design Review
Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project
and recommend the selected action below:
☒Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
☐Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating
revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The
revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning
Commission.
☐Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions
requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions
shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by
the Planning Director / Planning Commission.
Page 28
DRC COMMENTS
DRC2023-00379 – GORRE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
October 1, 2024
Page 3
☐Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
Members Present:
Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Principal Planner
Exhibit A – Project Plans
Page 29
Design Review Committee Meeting Agenda
October 1, 2024
FINAL MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
New Time: 6:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on October 1, 2024. The meeting was called to order
by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:00 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chairman Boling and Commissioner Diaz
Correction to the members present; remove Commissioner Diaz and replace with Commissioner Daniels.
Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
B. Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1.
Consideration to adopt Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2024.
Item C1. Motion carried 2-0 vote.
D. Project Review Items
D1.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TENTATIVE MAP, DESIGN REVIEW & VARIANCE –
GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES – A request to subdivide approximately 1.7 acres of land
into 8 numbered and 4 lettered lots including site plan and design review of 8 duplexes (16
units total), and a variance to reduce the required streetscape setback for a site located
between 19th and Hamilton Streets east of Hermosa Avenue in the Medium Residential (M)
Zone; APN: 1076-121-03 (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20662, Design Review DRC2023-
00363, and Variance DRC2024-00300). The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects.
Staff presented the item. Committee members asked a number of questions regarding WQMP
facilities, wall height, street width, and requirements for completing sidewalks. Additional
questions from committee members included landscaping, specifically that the applicant
consider a tree type that does not drop pods, the placement of mailboxes, the placement of
solar and location of trash cans. Committee Members complimented the design. Committee
Member Boling inquired about the need for crosswalks and crossing guards, considering the
new proposed street included within the project design would terminate right in front of an
elementary school. Committee Members recommended that the applicant contact the school
district and City engineering department for requirements on crosswalks and crossing guards.
Committee members voted to move the item forward to the full Planning Commission with the
motion that the applicant consider flashing beacons in any potential crosswalk and coordinate
with the school district on the need for crossing guards and any other requirements the school
district may desire. The motion also included that the applicant consider revising the landscape
Page 30
plan as well as incorporate a dog relief station within the WQMP area.
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT –
GORRE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX - A request for site plan and architectural review of
45,993 square foot addition to an existing 98,406 square foot industrial building and a
Conditional Use Permit to operate a manufacturing use over 50,000 square feet located on
approximately 7.7 acres of land within Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone, located on the east
side of Toronto Avenue where it terminates into the BNSF/Metrolink right of way; APN: 0209-
401-05. (Design Review DRC2023-00379 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288). The
project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill
Development Projects.
Staff presented the item. Committee members asked general questions related to nonconforming setbacks
and the project’s compliance with other standards. Committee members asked the applicant questions about
the history of their business in Rancho Cucamonga and about business operations related to the proposed
addition. Committee members noted that the plan set did not include colored renderings which would have
been helpful in their review. Particularly since this is an addition to an existing building, colored renderings
would be helpful to distinguish the existing structure from the new addition. Staff responded that these items
will be addressed prior to the item going to the Planning Commission.
The Committee took the following action:
Recommend approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
E. Adjournment
Principal Planner Sean McPherson adjourned the meeting at 6:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Page 31
EXHIBIT D
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
Section 15332 Categorical Exemption Memorandum
Page 32
RESOLUTION NO. 25-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2023-00379, FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A
45,993 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 98,406 SQUARE
FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 7.7
ACRES OF LAND WITHIN MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 (ME2) ZONE,
LOCATED AT 8949 TORONTO AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0209-401-05.
A.Recitals.
1.Goree Architects for Cal Box filed an application for the issuance of Design Review
DRC2023-00379, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 23rd day of April 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on April 23, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The application applies to a project site located 8949 Toronto Avenue (APN: 0209-
401-05); and
b.The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit E
Page 33
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-012
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2023-00379 – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
April 23, 2025
Page 2
c. Approval is for the design review and site layout of a 45,993 square foot addition to
an existing 98,406 square foot industrial building; and
d. This application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288 to
operate a Light Manufacturing Large land use in the resulting 144,399 square foot building.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which designates the site
as 21st Century Employment District. This designation allows for the expansion of existing industrial
uses, provided they maintain clean industrial operations. The project includes the construction of a
45,993-square-foot addition to an existing 98,406-square-foot industrial building used for
manufacturing purposes, aligning with the intent of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is located as the project site is within the Mixed
Employment 2 (ME2) Zone which permits Light Manufacturing Large land uses subject to the
approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The Development Code permits the expansion of existing non-conforming
buildings that do not result in an increase of the discrepancy between existing conditions and the
standards for “front yard, side yards, rear yard or height of structures, distances between structures,
and parking facilities…”. The proposed addition will reduce the current non-conforming front setback
in conformance with the Development Code; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. A CEQA exemption was prepared for the project which determined
that the propose building addition would not have a significant impact on the environment.
4. Planning staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines.
The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill
Development Projects, as the project is for the construction of a 45,993-square-foot addition to an
existing 98,406-square-foot industrial building. The Section 15332 CEQA exemption covers infill
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
North BNSF/Metrolink
Right of Way - -
South Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
East Vacant Land City Center Center 2 (CE2)
West Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
Page 34
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-012
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2023-00379 – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
April 23, 2025
Page 3
developments on sites less than 5 acres in area that will not have a significant impact relating to
traffic, noise, air quality, or water.
A Section 15332 CEQA exemption was prepared by UES (April 2025), an environmental consultant
hired by the City (Exhibit D – CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption), to demonstrate compliance
with the Section 15332 exemption. Staff evaluated the CEQA exemption prepared by UES and
concluded that the impacted area is less than 5 acres in area and will not have a significant impact
on the environment relating to biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water. The Planning
Commission has reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption, and based on its
own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in
the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF April 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 23rd day of April 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 35
RESOLUTION NO. 25-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT DRC2024-00288, TO OPERATE A MANUFACTURING USE
OVER 50,000 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELY 7.7 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 (ME2) ZONE, LOCATED AT 8949
TORONTO AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF –
APN: 0209-401-05.
A. Recitals.
1. Goree Architects for Cal Box filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use
Permit DRC2024-00288, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 23rd day of April 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on April 23, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a project site located at 8949 Toronto Avenue (APN:
0209-401-05); and
b. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
North BNSF/Metrolink
Right of Way - -
South Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
East Vacant Land City Center Center 2 (CE2)
West Industrial Building 21st Century
Employment District Mixed Employment 2 (ME2)
Page 36
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-013
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2024-00288 – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
April 23, 2025
Page 2
c. Approval is for the operation of a Light Manufacturing Large land use within a
144,399 square foot building; and
d. The subject Conditional Use Permit is related to Development Review DRC2023-
00379 to expand an existing 98,406 square foot building by 45,993 square feet (total area 144,399).
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The use is consistent with the general plan designation. The 21st Century
Employment District permits existing industrial uses to remain. The site is developed with an
existing industrial building, parking, and landscaping. The related expansion of the existing
industrial building (Design Review DRC2023-00379) is not expected to increase the number of
employees or vehicle trips to the project site as it will bring activities that currently take place
outdoors within the expanded building footprint; and
b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and
the purposes of the applicable zone as well as any applicable specific plans or city
regulations/standards. Per Development Code Table 17.136.020-1 (Allowed Land Uses in Form-
Based Zones), manufacturing uses over 50,000 square feet are classified as Light Manufacturing
Large and require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the Mixed Employment 2
(ME2) Zone. The existing manufacturing use has been in operation in the current location prior to
the CUP requirement. With the proposed expansion, the existing manufacturing use must obtain a
CUP to comply with this requirement; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being
proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of
the use undesirable. The project’s scale and operation align with the intensity of neighboring land uses.
The proposed conditions of approval will ensure compliance with performance criteria, safety standards,
maintenance expectations, and all related municipal codes to mitigate any potential adverse impacts
associated with the manufacturing process; and
d. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be
compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity, including transportation and service
facilities. The manufacturing use on the site will take place entirely indoors, and the intensity of the use is
not expected to exceed that of the current use on the site; and
e. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the
public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The scale and operation of the
use are of similar intensity to the surrounding uses. The use has been conditioned to meet performance
criteria, safety standards, maintenance standards, and all other Municipal Code standards to mitigate
any potential impact related to the proposed manufacturing use; and
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire,
streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to
the use. The expansion of the existing operation is not expected to hinder the city’s ability to maintain its
current level of service; and
Page 37
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-013
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2024-00288 – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL BOX
April 23, 2025
Page 3
g. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities, as outlined in Section 4 below.
4. Planning staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines.
The project also qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 –
Existing Facilities, which covers the permitting of existing structures . The Planning Commission has
reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption, and based on its own independent
judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in
the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 23rd day of April 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 38
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
1.
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
2.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 39
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
3.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
4.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
5.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .
Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the
Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined
in 17.124.020.D.
If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building
permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.
If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an
application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to
the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate
the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.
If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be
subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the
proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
6.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all
other applicable City Ordinances.
7.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
8.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 40
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
9.
All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb
stop).
10.
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and
exits shall be striped per City standards.
11.
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
12.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections
shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent
nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included
in building plans.
13.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Development Impact Fees:
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance (Subject to Change / Periodic
Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 41
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Except as otherwise provided in this condition, the applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee to the City’s Active
Transportation Fund in an amount determined by the City Engineer. This fee shall be used for the
design and construction of the multipurpose trail located along the northerly side of the parcel limits
(approximately 533 feet). The in-lieu fee shall include the construction and /or installation of a paved
Class 1 Bikeway, sidewalk, signage, striping, landscape, and lighting, and design costs. The in -lieu fee
improvement requirements may change if the payment of the in -lieu fee satisfies the project’s obligation
for active transportation improvements and must be completed prior Certificate of Occupancy.
The City is undergoing an amendment change to the General Plan that may alter or eliminate the
required on-site multipurpose trail required as of the date of this approval. If the General Plan
amendment alters the multipurpose trail, the in -lieu fee for the required improvements listed above may
change. If the amendment to the General Plan is approved with the elimination of the on -site
multipurpose trial prior to Certificate of Occupancy, this condition of approval will no longer be required
or imposed by the City on the project.
2.
Standard Conditions of Approval
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City 's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
3.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.4.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the
Fire District.
2.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 42
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.
3.
Any changes or modifications to the fire sprinkler system, fire alarm system, exhaust hood fire
suppression system, or the commercial cooking appliances require the approval of the Fire District .
Plans for modifications are required to be deferred submittals with the work completed under separate
permits.
4.
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.
5.
Emergency responder communication coverage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-12 is
required for the building (s) included in this project. A radio signal strength test of the public safety radio
communication system conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 2022 California Fire
Code is required to be submitted. Where existing radio signal strength does not meet the requirements
of the Fire Code, a separate submittal for an emergency responder communication coverage system is
required.
6.
The warehouse portion of this building may be allowed to utilize forklift and powered industrial truck
mounted fire extinguishers to meet the Fire Code requirement for fire extinguishers. Please consult with
the fire code official.
7.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
8.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
9.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
10.
The most current versions of the Fire District's Standards can be found at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/86zjfacfxqh8oeo/AABYEQ81w5vL7WZ7e1zBiu25a?dl=0
11.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings to Building and
Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes
including all local ordinances and standards.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 43
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
1.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
2.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
3.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The Grading
and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval.
4.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
5.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
6.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible ,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
7.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
8.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
9.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
10.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 44
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative , the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i)The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii)Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii)At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Engineering
Services Department an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly
wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan )
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
12.
Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
13.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
14.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
15.
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities ,
storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall
be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch
to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement.
16.
A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for any work within their right -of-way,
including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit.
17.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding
site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and
Safety Official for review.
18.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 45
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
19.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office .
20.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
21.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety
Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and /or approval of the
project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and
pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the
project-specific Water Quality Management Plan .
22.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
23.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Engineering Services Department, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm
Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any
building permit.
24.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
25.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 46
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No .
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements ).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a.Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b.Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c.Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics ), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d.Unless adequate pre -treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity {77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic ); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e.Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular {78} repair or
maintenance activities {79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used
car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f.Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h.The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
26.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 47
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1
(Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the
pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following
measures:
5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance – Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and /or erosion
control ordinance.
5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) – Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion
by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping
BMP.
1.Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include ,
but are not limited to, the following:
a.Scheduling construction activity.
b.Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil.
c.Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow.
d.Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils.
e.Erosion control to protect slopes.
f.Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts).
g.Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls).
h.Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site.
i.Stabilized construction exits.
j.Wind erosion control.
k.Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency .
2.Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be
considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the
following:
a.Material handling and waste management.
b.Building materials stockpile management.
c.Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.).
d.Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area.
e.Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site .
f.Spill prevention and control.
g.Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga).
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 48
Project #: DRC2023-00379 DRC2024-00288
Project Name: Cal Box II
Location: 8949 TORONTO AVE - 020940105-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10
(Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water
flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1.Swales.
2.Water collection and disposal systems .
3.French drains.
4.Water retention gardens .
5.Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater
recharge.
Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path.
28.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 11Printed: 4/10/2025
Page 49