HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-18 - Minutes
Design Review Committee Meeting Agenda
February 18, 2025
FINAL MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
New Time: 6:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on February 18, 2025. The meeting was called to
order by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:02 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chairman Boling and Commissioner Daniels
Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
B. Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1.
Consideration to adopt Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2024.
Item C1. Motion carried 2-0 vote as presented.
D. Project Review Items
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW – STUDIO ROCA – A request for site
plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously
approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential
(VL) Zone and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a
Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects
(Design Review DRC2024-00174).
The Committee members raised several questions related to trails, overall design, the interior
dimensions of the garages, and the project’s connection to the sewer system.
The applicant clarified that equestrian trails would be constructed along the perimeter of the
project site, with planned connections to the existing trail network. They also stated that the
garages would be designed to accommodate recreational vehicles as well as multiple
passenger vehicles. Additionally, the project is required to connect to the existing sewer system
located on Beryl Street. A new sewer line will be installed through Camelia Court, providing the
opportunity for existing homes along Camelia Court to connect to the sewer system.
Committee members expressed support for the site layout and architectural design. Following
the discussion, the Committee voted to advance the project to the full Planning Commission
for a final decision.
Recommended approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
E. Adjournment
Principal Planner McPherson adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant