HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-05-14 - Agenda Packet
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
May 14, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:30 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Chairman Morales
Vice Chairman Boling
Commissioner Dopp
Commissioner Daniels
Commissioner Diaz
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Commission (“Planning
Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the
Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included
on the agenda, but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2025.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – KIMLEY HORN- A request to permit wholesale and distribution,
manufacturing, e-commerce distribution/fulfillment, and storage warehouse uses at two existing
industrial buildings that consist of 418,265 and 331,872 square feet and are currently occupied with
legal non-conforming e-commerce distribution/fulfillment and wholesale and distribution uses within
the Neo-Industrial (NI) zone and the Neo-Industrial Employment District General Plan land use
designation at 11555 and 11599 Arrow Route, respectively; APNs 0229-111-64 and 0229-111-65. This
item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA
Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (DRC2024-00378 and DRC2024-00379).
D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW – STUDIO ROCA – A request for site plan
and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract
map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone, Hillside
Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a Class 32
exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects (Design Review
DRC2024-00174).
E. GENERAL BUSINESS
E1. Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Major Projects Program for Fiscal Year 2025/26.
F. DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
H. ADJOURNMENT
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,
given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your
position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may
present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience
should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing
impaired.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After
speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your
name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited
to 3 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.”
As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to
Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed
to the Commissioners and included in the record.
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeals filed must be in writing with the City Clerk’s
Office, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by an appeal fee pursuant to the most adopted
fee schedule for all decisions for the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session.
I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted Seventy-Two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California
and on the City's website.
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 23, 2025
Page 1 of 3
2
8
3
1
Historic Preservation Commission
and
Planning Commission Agenda
April 23, 2025
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was
held on April 23rd, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Boling at 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp,
Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director; Tabe
van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
There were no public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 9, 2025.
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Diaz. Motion carried 4-1,
with Chairman Morales abstained.
D. Public Hearings
D1. DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – GOREE ARCHITECHTS FOR CAL
BOX - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 45,993 square foot addition to an
existing 98,406 square foot industrial building and a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
manufacturing use within Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone, at 8949 Toronto Avenue; APN: 0209-
401-05. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section
15332 – Infill Development Projects. The project also qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (Design Review DRC2023-00379 and
Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00288).
Associate Planner Tabe van der Zwaag presented a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted
that a copy of the letter from CEQA vendor, Universal Engineering Sciences (UES), responding to
Lozeau Drury, LLP (Attorney’s Office), was provided to the commissioners under separate cover on
4/21/2025 and was available at the meeting for viewing.
Page 4
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 23, 2025
Page 2 of 3
2
8
3
1
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
Applicant Widera and Plant Manager Baker where both in attendance and available for questions.
Commissioner Dopp asked whether this serves as their manufacturing facility.
Applicant Widera confirmed.
Commissioner Dopp stated that their intent is not to expand production, but rather to address
storage needs.
Applicant Widera confirmed. He explained that when the corrugated materials are stored outside,
they are subject to weather conditions, and they often experience some loss of product especially
when it rains.
Vice Chairman Boling inquired whether the site is fully developed, and owner occupied.
Applicant Widera confirmed.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that storage operations are currently conducted outdoors, and those
activities will be moved indoors, thereby reducing noise, lighting and air quality issues compared
to current operations.
Applicant Widera agreed.
Chairman Morales asked whether there would be any increase truck traffic to the site than what
they already have.
Applicant Widera confirmed that there should be no increase in traffic.
Chase Preciado, Lozeau Drury representative, spoke against the project.
For the record, it is noted that correspondence from Lozeau Drury was received after the agenda
packet was prepared, expressing opposition to the project due to environmental concerns and
stated a mitigated negative declaration or and environmental impact report should be completed
for the project. The actual correspondence should be referred to for details.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Applicant Widera responded to the public comment, and stated there will be no extra burden on
the environment. He said it will reduce the noise and beautify the area.
Commissioner Dopp expressed appreciation for seeing a business that continues to engage in
manufacturing within the city limits. He also thanked staff for addressing environmental concerns.
He noted that the land has previously been used for storage, there will be no business expansion,
and no increase in traffic is anticipated. He stated his support for the project.
Commissioner Daniels expressed appreciation to the applicant for their continued investment in
the community. He agreed that relocating the storage operation indoors would enhance efficiency
and commended the applicant for complying with all development codes.
Commissioner Diaz expressed her appreciation that they are focused not only on maintaining the
quality of their product by protecting it from external elements, but more importantly, ensuring the
safety of their workers.
Page 5
HPC/PC Draft Minutes – April 23, 2025
Page 3 of 3
2
8
3
1
Vice Chairman Boling commended the Economic Development Department for their excellent
work in attracting new businesses. He also highlighted their efforts in supporting business
retention through ongoing collaboration with local companies. He thanked the applicant for
reinvesting in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, noting that this demonstrates the city’s initiatives
are well aligned with the needs of the business community.
Chairman Morales concurred with Commissioners and expressed that he is in favor of the project.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Commissioner Daniels to adopt Resolution
2025-012, Design Review DRC2023-00379 and 2025-013 Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-
00288. Motion carried 5-0.
E. General Business
E1. Urban Design Presentation by Torti Gallas + Partners (TG+P). (Verbal Report Only)
Planning Director Nakamura introduced Neal Payton from Torti Gallas + Partners who gave a
presentation on urban design and architectural strategies.
Chairman Morales commended Mr. Payton for an informative presentation. It was received and
filed.
F. Director Announcements - None
G. Commission Announcements - None
H. Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling, seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adjourn the
meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department
Approved:
Page 6
DATE:May 14, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – KIMLEY HORN- A request to permit
wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment, and storage warehouse uses at two existing
industrial buildings that consist of 418,265 and 331,872 square feet and
are currently occupied with legal non-conforming e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment and wholesale and distribution uses within the Neo-
Industrial (NI) zone and the Neo-Industrial Employment District General
Plan land use designation at 11555 and 11599 Arrow Route, respectively;
APNs 0229-111-64 and 0229-111-65. This item is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under
CEQA Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (DRC2024-00378 and
DRC2024-00379).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions for the approvals of
Conditional Use Permits DRC2024-00378 and DRC2024-00379 with the attached conditions of
approval.
BACKGROUND:
The project site, which consists of two adjacent parcels located midblock between Arrow Route
and Jersey Boulevard and between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, totals 34.06 acres.
Both parcels are located within an industrial business park known as the “Rancho Cucamonga
Distribution Center,” with the easternmost of the two (2) parcels being located at 11555 Arrow
Route and westernmost parcel being located at 11599 Arrow Route. The site addressed 11555
Arrow has a total acreage of 19.56 acres while 11599 Arrow comprises of 14.50 acres. 11555
Arrow is approximately 669 feet along the northern property line, 535 feet on the southern property
line, 1,242 feet along the eastern property line, and 1,449 feet on the western property line. 11599
Arrow is approximately 556 feet on the northern property, 508 feet along the southern property
line, 1,220 feet on the eastern property line, and 1,242 feet along the western property line.
Both sites are owned by a private entity known as “Rancho Cucamonga II Incorporated” and
developed with existing industrial warehouses. 11555 Arrow contains a 418,265 square foot
building that is currently occupied by Faro Logistics, an e-commerce distribution and fulfillment
center use. This site contains 223 standard parking spaces, three (3) motorcycle stalls, and 170
trailer parking stalls. 11599 Arrow is developed with a 331,872 square foot building that is currently
occupied by Comptree, a wholesale and distribution use. The site contains 226 standard parking
spaces, three (3) motorcycle stalls, and 115 trailer parking stalls. Both sites are fully improved
and contain landscaping improvements along Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard and Boston Place.
Page 7
Page 2 of 4
2
7
9
0
Access to the sites are provided from two (2) driveway aprons on Arrow Route and two (2)
driveway aprons from Jersey Boulevard. 11599 Arrow also contains an additional driveway apron
from Boston Place. Both sites can also be accessed from the three (3) driveway aprons provided
on Milliken Avenue as well as each of the four (4) buildings in the industrial business park contain
a reciprocal access agreement with one another.
Figure 1 – Site Map
The applicant, Kimley Horn, on behalf of Rancho Cucamonga II Incorporated, is requesting
approval of Conditional Use Permits DRC2024-00378 and DRC2024-00379 to legalize the
existing e-commerce distribution/fulfillment and wholesale and distribution uses at 11555 Arrow
and 11599 Arrow, respectively. The Conditional Use Permit applications also request to permit
wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce distribution/fulfillment, and storage
warehouses for future tenants at both sites. While the two (2) subject parcels are owned by the
same entity, the applicant has requested two (2) separate Conditional Use Permits, one (1) to go
with each property. There are no site or building changes or improvements proposed as part of
the current entitlement request.
The existing land use, General Plan land use designation, and zoning designation for the project
site and adjacent properties are as follows:
11555 Arrow 11599 Arrow
Arrow Route
Jersey Blvd
Bo
s
t
o
n
P
l
Page 8
Page 3 of 4
2
7
9
0
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
South Food
Processing/Manufacturing
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
East
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, Wholesale and Distribution – Medium
and Storage Warehouse uses require approval of a Conditional Use Permit prior to operation. In
addition, Manufacturing, Light – Large and E-Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large
uses require approval of a Minor Use Permit. The proposed Conditional Use Permits will be
inclusive of uses that require a Minor Use Permit approved at a Planning Director level for the
purpose of consolidation of applications. Obtaining a Conditional Use Permit for each of the four
(4) uses will allow for any future businesses who occupy the building and qualify as one of the
identified uses to bypass individual entitlements. The Conditional Use Permit will also legalize the
current uses occupying the buildings as the uses are currently considered legal non-conforming
since the adoption of Ordinance 982 in 2021. Prior to Ordinance 982, uses such as E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment Centers and Wholesale and Distribution were permitted by right. The
existing uses on both sites may maintain their operations under the legal non-conforming
provisions of Chapter 17.62 of the Development Code, provided that any discontinuations of the
prior use do not exceed 365 days; however, the property owner is requesting to bring them into
conformance with the current code through the proposed Conditional Use Permits.
The Conditional Use Permits will go into effect and legalize the existing uses (e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment and wholesale and distribution) at the two (2) sites, effective immediately
after the ten (10) day appeal period ceases. Both businesses currently hold active business
licenses obtained upon initial occupancy of the sites. As the uses are already in operation and no
additional improvements or alterations are proposed for the buildings or sites, no further action
will be required to implement the Conditional Use Permits as is typically required by Section
17.14.090 of the Development Code.
Public Art
Per Section 17.124.020A of the Development Code, public art requirements do not apply to
Conditional Use Permits and are applicable only to Site Development Review, Minor Design
Review, or Major Design Review applications that meet specified criteria. As such, the Conditional
Use Permits are exempt from the public art requirement.
Page 9
Page 4 of 4
2
7
9
0
Environmental Assessment
The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA
Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section
15301 – Existing Facilities, which includes the permitting and leasing of existing private structures.
The project scope is for the permitting of wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment, and storage warehouse uses with no alterations proposed to the exterior
of two (2) existing buildings or sites. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
Correspondence
The project was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on May 1, 2025. Notices were mailed to a total of 44 property
owners within 1,500 feet of the site on April 29, 2025. The site was posted on April 30, 2025. As
of date, staff have not received any communication from the public regarding this project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Conditional Use Permits allows the buildings to be leased and re-tenanted in the
future efficiently, allowing for job creation and secondary economic benefits.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed Conditional Use Permits address the City Council’s core value of intentionally
embracing and anticipating our future by planning for future uses in existing industrial buildings to
allow economic activity to thrive.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – 11555 Arrow Route Project Plans
Exhibit B – 11599 Arrow Route Project Plans
Exhibit C – Draft Resolution of Approval for 11555 Arrow Route
Exhibit D – Draft Resolution of Approval for 11599 Arrow Route
Page 10
A
R
R
O
W
R
O
U
T
E
43 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60 SHARED TRAILER STALLS
11555 ARROW ROUTE
BLDG 418,265 S.F.
43 DOCK HIGH DOORS
25.0'
PARKING
SETBACK
45.0'
BLDG &
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
36
0
.
0
'
J
E
R
S
E
Y
B
L
V
D
GRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
GRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
GRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
GRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
5
.
0
'
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20.0'
PARK
I
N
G
SETBA
C
K
35.0'
BLDG
&
LAND
S
C
A
P
E
SETB
A
C
K
5.
0
'
SI
D
E
Y
A
R
D
SE
T
B
A
C
K
5.
0
'
SI
D
E
Y
A
R
D
SE
T
B
A
C
K
5.0'
SIDEYARD
SETBACK
5.0'
SIDEYAR
D
SETBACK
81
.
7
'
SE
T
B
A
C
K
97
.
0
'
SE
T
B
A
C
K
93.7'
SETBACK
8
1
.
7
'
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
85.3'
SETBAC
K
6
6
8
'
-
1
1
"
'
1241'-9"'
5
3
4
'
-
6
"
'
413'-
1
0
"
'
1035'-1"'
5.
0
'
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
SE
T
B
A
C
K
668'-11"'
1241
'
-
9
"
'
534'-6"'
413'
-
1
0
"
'
1035
'
-
1
"
'
EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN
NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE
DWG NAME K:\RIV_PLAN\195514001 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAREHOUSES BARINGS ENTITLEMENT\ENTITLEMENT\CUP\11555 ARROW ROUTE - DRC2024-00378\2024.05.15_SITE PLAN EXHIBIT\RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA - 11555 ARROW ROUTE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT.DWG
LAST SAVED 1/28/2025 8:54 AM
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.543.9868
JERS
E
Y
B
L
V
D
ARROW ROUTE
M
I
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
BO
S
T
O
N
P
L
SITE
N
O
R
T
H
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SITE UTILIZATION MAP NORTH
ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY
11555 ARROW ROUTE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
022911164
ZONING
NEO INDUSTRIAL (NI)
APPLICANT
KIMLEY-HORN
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
CONTACT: MEGHAN D. KARADIMOS
TEL: (951) 335-8283
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, INC.
SITE AREA
PROJECT DATA
IN S.F.
IN ACRES
852,034
19.56
BUILDING AREA
OFFICE
MEZZANINE
9,108 S.F.
N/A
WAREHOUSE 409,157 S.F.
TOTAL 418,265 S.F.
COVERAGE 49.1%
STAIRS N/A
PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
STANDARD (9' x 18')
ADA STALLS
215 STALLS
8 STALLS
SHARED TRAILER PARKING (12' x 60')60 STALLS
DOCK HIGH DOORS (12' x 60')86 DOCKS
SETBACKS
JERSEY BLVE - COLLECTOR
ARROW ROUTE - MAJOR ARTERIAL
35 FT BLDG & LANDSCAPE
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED
HEIGHT - 45 FT
MAXIMUM FLOOR TO AREA RATIO
FAR - 0.60
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
PERCENTAGE - 10%
LANDSCAPE PROVIDED
PERCENTAGE
IN S.F.
7.2%
61,181 S.F.
OFFICE: 4 / 1,000 S.F.36 STALLS
E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION:
1 SPACE PER 1.5 WAREHOUSE 126 STALLS
OR PRODUCTION WORKERS
TOTAL 182 STALLS
20 FT PARKING
45 FT BLDG & LANDSCAPE
25 FT PARKING
INTERIOR SIDE YARD 5 FT
REAR YARD 0 FT
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROPERTY LINES, BUILDINGS, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, AND SITE
INFORMATION WAS DECIPHERED WITH DOWNLOADABLE GIS DATA AND
AERIAL IMAGING. ALL DATA IS APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED
WITH A PROFESSIONAL SURVEY.
2. ALL REQUIRED PROJECT DATA CAME FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE DATED JUNE 3, 2023. NOTE: SITE DATA MAY
HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
11555 ARROW ROUTE
GROUND LEVEL DOORS (12' x 60')4 DOCKS
RESERVED TRAILER PARKING (12' x 60')20 STALLS
TOTAL 396 STALLS
SETBACK LINE
ACTUAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR FOR THE CEILING/ROOF
HEIGHT - 30 FT
BUILDING IS EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
MOTORCYCLE STALLS 3 STALLS
TRAILER PARKING:
1 OFF-STREET LOADING SPACE,
PLUS 1 ADDITIONAL LOADING
SPACE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL
40,000 S.F. FLOOR AREA
20 STALLS
Exhibit A
Page 11
ARROW ROUTE
JERS
E
Y
B
L
V
D
LOBBY
BATHROOM
HALLWAY
BATHROOM
ENTRYWAY
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
BATHROOM
BATHROOM
LOBBY
HALLWAY
ENTRYWAY
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
BATH-
ROOM
HALLWAY
ENTRYWAY
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
CONFERENCE
ROOM
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
CONFERENCE
ROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
CONFERENCE
ROOM
BATH-
ROOM
OFFICE
HALLWAY
BATH-
ROOM
BATH-
ROOM
N1 FIREDOOR N2 FIREDOOR
E1 FIREDOOR
E2 FIREDOOR
E3 FIREDOOR
W1 FIREDOOR
W2 FIREDOOR
W3 FIREDOOR
S1 FIREDOOR S2 FIREDOOR
N1 FIREDOOR N2 FIREDOOR
E1 FIREDOOR
E2 FIREDOOR
E3 FIREDOOR
W1 FIREDOOR
W2 FIREDOOR
W3 FIREDOOR
S1 FIREDOOR S2 FIREDOOR
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE
DWG NAME K:\RIV_PLAN\195514001 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAREHOUSES BARINGS ENTITLEMENT\ENTITLEMENT\CUP\11555 ARROW ROUTE - DRC2024-00378\2024.05.15_SITE PLAN EXHIBIT\RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA - 11555 ARROW ROUTE SITE PLAN.DWG
LAST SAVED 1/20/2025 2:26 PM
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.543.9868
JERS
E
Y
B
L
V
D
ARROW ROUTE
M
I
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
BO
S
T
O
N
P
L
SITE
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SITE UTILI=ATION MAP NORTH
ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY
11555 ARROW ROUTE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ASSESSOR
S PARCEL NUMBER
022911164
=ONING
NEO INDUSTRIAL (NI)
APPLICANT
KIMLEY-HORN
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
CONTACT: MEGHAN D. KARADIMOS
TEL: (951) 335-8283
APPLICANT
S REPRESENTATIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, INC.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROPERTY LINES, BUILDINGS, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, AND SITE
INFORMATION WAS DECIPHERED WITH DOWNLOADABLE GIS DATA AND
AERIAL IMAGING. ALL DATA IS APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED
WITH A PROFESSIONAL SURVEY.
2. ALL REQUIRED PROJECT DATA CAME FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE DATED JUNE 3, 2023. NOTE: SITE DATA MAY
HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
11555 ARROW ROUTE
N.T.S
NORTH
Page 12
A
R
R
O
W
R
O
U
T
E
60 TRAILER STALLS
11599 ARROW ROUTE
BLDG 331,872 S.F.
25'
PARKING
SETBACK
45'
BLDG &
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
J
E
R
S
E
Y
B
L
V
D
GRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
BOSTON PL
53 DOCK HIGH DOORSGRADE LEVEL
DOCK DOOR
20'
PARKING
SETBACK
35'
BLDG &
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
1241'-9"'
1220'-3"'
55
5
'
-
9
"
'
50
8
'
-
2
"
'
98'-0"'
SETBACK
113'-10"'
SETBACK
68'-1"'
SETBACK
81'-3"'
SETBACK
5'
SIDEYARD
SETBACK
5'
SIDEYARD
SETBACK
5'
SIDEYARD
SETBACK
5'
SIDEYARD
SETBACK
EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN
NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE
DWG NAME K:\RIV_PLAN\195514001 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAREHOUSES BARINGS ENTITLEMENT\ENTITLEMENT\CUP\11599 ARROW ROUTE - DRC2024-00379\2024.05.15_SITE PLAN EXHIBIT\RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA - 11599 ARROW ROUTE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT.DWG
LAST SAVED 1/2/2025 5:09 PM
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.543.9868
JERS
E
Y
B
L
V
D
ARROW ROUTE
M
I
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
BO
S
T
O
N
P
L
SITE
N
O
R
T
H
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SITE UTILIZATION MAP NORTH
ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY
11599 ARROW ROUTE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
022911165
ZONING
NEO INDUSTRIAL (NI)
APPLICANT
KIMLEY-HORN
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
CONTACT: MEGHAN D. KARADIMOS
TEL: (951) 335-8283
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, INC.
SITE AREA
PROJECT DATA
IN S.F.
IN ACRES
631,620
14.50
BUILDING AREA
OFFICE
MEZZANINE
2,250 S.F.
N/A
WAREHOUSE 329,622 S.F.
TOTAL 331,872 S.F.
COVERAGE 52.5%
STAIRS N/A
PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
STANDARD (9' x 18')
ADA STALLS
219 STALLS
7 STALLS
TRAILER PARKING (12' x 45')60 STALLS
DOCK HIGH DOORS (12' x 60')53 DOCKS
SETBACKS
JERSEY BLVE - COLLECTOR
ARROW ROUTE - MAJOR ARTERIAL
35 FT BLDG & LANDSCAPE
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED
HEIGHT - 45 FT
MAXIMUM FLOOR TO AREA RATIO
FAR - 0.60
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
PERCENTAGE - 10%
LANDSCAPE PROVIDED
PERCENTAGE
IN S.F.
14.0%
88,458 S.F.
OFFICE: 4 / 1,000 S.F.9 STALLS
WHSE: 1ST 20K @ 1 / 1,000 S.F.20 STALLS
2ND 20K @ 1 / 2,000 S.F.10 STALLS
ABOVE 40K @ 1 / 4,000 S.F.72 STALLS
20 FT PARKING
45 FT BLDG & LANDSCAPE
25 FT PARKING
INTERIOR SIDE YARD 5 FT
REAR YARD 0 FT
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROPERTY LINES, BUILDINGS, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, AND SITE
INFORMATION WAS DECIPHERED WITH DOWNLOADABLE GIS DATA AND
AERIAL IMAGING. ALL DATA IS APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED
WITH A PROFESSIONAL SURVEY.
2. ALL REQUIRED PROJECT DATA CAME FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE DATED JUNE 3, 2023. NOTE: SITE DATA MAY
HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
11599 ARROW ROUTE
GROUND LEVEL DOORS (12' x 60') 2 DOCKS
TOTAL 344 STALLS
SETBACK LINE
ACTUAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR FOR THE CEILING/ROOF
HEIGHT - 30 FT
BUILDING IS EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
MOTORCYCLE STALLS 3 STALLS
TRAILER PARKING:
1 PER DOCK DOOR 55 STALLS
TOTAL 166 STALLS
Exhibit B
Page 13
J
E
R
S
E
Y
B
L
V
D
A
R
R
O
W
R
O
U
T
E
BOSTON PL
N1 FIREDOOR
N2 FIREDOOR
E1 FIREDOORE2 FIREDOOR
E3 FIREDOOR
W1 FIREDOORW2 FIREDOORW3 FIREDOOR
S1 FIREDOOR
ENTRYWAY
CONFERENCE
ROOM
HALLWAY
OFFICE
BATH-
ROOM
BATH-
ROOM
BATH-
ROOM
BATH-
ROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
WAITING
ROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
CLOSET
CONFERENCE
ROOM
HALLWAY
N1 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
N2 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
E1 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
E2 FI
R
E
D
O
O
R
E3 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
W1 FI
R
E
D
O
O
R
W2 FI
R
E
D
O
O
R
W3 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
S1 F
I
R
E
D
O
O
R
offices
offices
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE
DWG NAME K:\RIV_PLAN\195514001 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAREHOUSES BARINGS ENTITLEMENT\ENTITLEMENT\CUP\11599 ARROW ROUTE - DRC2024-00379\2024.05.15_SITE PLAN EXHIBIT\RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA - 11599 ARROW ROUTE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN.DWG
LAST SAVED 1/20/2025 5:43 PM
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.543.9868
JERS
E
Y
B
L
V
D
ARROW ROUTE
M
I
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
BO
S
T
O
N
P
L
SITE
N
O
R
T
H
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SITE UTILI=ATION MAP NORTH
ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY
11599 ARROW ROUTE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ASSESSOR
S PARCEL NUMBER
022911165
=ONING
NEO INDUSTRIAL (NI)
APPLICANT
KIMLEY-HORN
3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
CONTACT: MEGHAN D. KARADIMOS
TEL: (951) 335-8283
APPLICANT
S REPRESENTATIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, INC.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROPERTY LINES, BUILDINGS, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, AND SITE
INFORMATION WAS DECIPHERED WITH DOWNLOADABLE GIS DATA AND
AERIAL IMAGING. ALL DATA IS APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED
WITH A PROFESSIONAL SURVEY.
2. ALL REQUIRED PROJECT DATA CAME FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE DATED JUNE 3, 2023. NOTE: SITE DATA MAY
HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
11599 ARROW ROUTE
N.T.S
2,250 SF
Page 14
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2024-00378, A REQUEST TO
PERMIT WHOLESALE AND DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING,
E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION/ FULFILLMENT, AND STORAGE
WAREHOUSE USES AT AN EXISTING INDUSTIRAL BUILDING
THAT CONSISTS OF 418,265 SQUARE FEET AND IS
CURRENTLY OCCUPIED WITH A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING
E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION/ FULFILLMENT CENTER USE
WITHIN THE NEO-INDUSTRIAL (NI) ZONE AND THE NEO-
INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION AT 11555 ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229-111-64.
A.Recitals.
1.The Applicant, Kimley Horn, on behalf of the property owner Ranch Cucamonga II Inc,
filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00378, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred
to as "the application."
2.On the 14th day of May 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 14, 2025, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The project site consists of approximately 19.56 acres of land developed with a
418,265 square foot industrial buildng and is located on the south side of Arrow Route and the
north side of Jersey Boulevard between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue; and
b.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit C
Page 15
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-015
DRC2024-00378 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The uses are consistent with the General Plan designation, Neo-Industrial
Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts
and the growth of creative and innovative industries and new businesses. The fully improved site
is developed with an existing 418,265 square foot industrial building. Upon approval of the
requested Conditonal Use Permit, wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment, and storage warehouse uses will have minimal impact on adjacent uses
and properties as the Conditional Use Permit will support the entitlement of uses that are intended
for the zoning district and General Plan land use designation in addition to being with consistent
with the surrounding uses. The uses are consistent with the General Plan.
b.The uses are consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and
purposes of the applicable zone as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations and
standards. Wholesale and Distribution – Medium and Storage Warehouse uses are permitted in
the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Manufacturing, Light
–Large and E-Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center uses are permitted within the Neo-
Industrial (NI) Zone upon the approval of a Minor Use Permit. The latter uses permitted under the
Minor Use Permit will be permitted through the Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of
consolidation of applications. The site is currently legal non-conforming due to the adoption of
Ordinance 982 as the e-commerce distribution/fulfillment use previously was permitted by right in
the zone, but now requires a Minor Use Permit. The uses are consistent with the zoning
designation and development code in that the uses do not propose new development or
expansion of the existing building and site and they remain consistent with the current
development pattern and uses in the adjacent properties and zone. The Development Code has
specific regulations and performance standards in relation to noise, vibrations, particulate matter
and air containminants, odor, and humidity, heat, and glare, which are applied to the operations
of industrial uses. The conditions of approval included can mitigate any potential impacts that the
facililty may cause. The site is not subject to any specific plans. The uses meet the regulations
and standards applied to Wholesale and Distribution – Medium, Storage Warehouse,
Manufacturing, Light – Large, and E-Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center uses and therefore
is consistent with the Development Code.
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
South Food
Processing/Manufacturing
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
East Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
Page 16
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-015
DRC2024-00378 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 3
c.The site is suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the uses. The site is
improved with an existing industrial building, access and circulation, parking, utilities, and
landscaping. No changes are proposed to the site except for potential tenant improvements which
will not increase the building footprint that may be submitted for by a new tenant. The uses are
similar in intensity to existing uses in the immediate surrounding area. No additional physical
constraints have been added that may impede the operation of the existing surrounding land use
nor the proposed land use. Therefore, the project site is well-suited for the uses.
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the uses would be
compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and
service facilities. The uses will operate within an existing industrial building and will not operate
beyond the project parcel nor onto the property of adjacent similar uses. The intensity of the uses
are not expected to exceed the intensity of adjacent similar uses.
e.Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the
vicinity in which the project is located. The scale and operation of the uses are similar to adjacent
uses and will not negatively impact the normal operations of any of the surrounding uses. The
uses have been conditioned to meet performance criteria, safety standards, maintenance
standards and all other Municipal Code standards to mitigate any potential impacts related to the
wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce distribution/fulfillment, and storage
warehouse uses.
f.The uses will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire,
streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service
due to the uses. The uses do not pose any undue burdens in that all uses are consistent with the
zone in which they are located and will not require additional service from streets and utilities as
there are no physical changes proposed to the site. The uses do not authorize any operations
which may result in additional service requests from Fire or Police that are not normally associated
with similar adjacent existing uses.
4.The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project
qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing
Facilities, which includes the permitting and leasing of existing private structures. The Conditional
Use Permit will permit Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Manufacturing, Light - Large, E-
Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center, and Storage Warehouse uses where no alterations
proposed to the exterior of the building or site will take place.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neo-Industrial
Employment District and Neo-Industrial, respectively, which conditionally permits Wholesale and
Distribution – Medium and Storage Warehouse uses. Manufacturing, Light – Large and E-
Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large uses are also conditionally permitted, but
through a Minor Use Permit. The latter two (2) uses can be approved under the purview of the
Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of consolidation of applications. The project complies with
the City’s development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, and design
requirements as the proposed uses are to occur within an existing building. The project site is
located within the City limits and is surrounded on all four (4) sides by existing industrial buildings
and uses. No physical expansion is proposed as part of this project.
Page 17
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-015
DRC2024-00378 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 4
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption,
and based on its own independent judgement, concurs in the staff determination of exemption.
5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 18
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2024-00378
Project Name: 11555 Arrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11555 ARROW RTE - 022911164-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The Conditional Use Permit authorizes use of the existing 418,265 square foot warehouse building for a
distribution/fulfillment center, manufacturing, a storage warehouse, and/or wholesale and distribution
within the Neo-Industrial (NI) zone, located at 11555 Arrow Route; APN: 0229-111-64.
1.
The Conditional Use Permit does not authorize outdoor storage of materials. Any future requests for
outdoor storage shall be subject to a Minor Use Permit.
2.
All current and future uses on the site shall comply with the performance standards outlined in Chapter
17.66 of the Development Code, specifically the performance standards outlined for industrial uses.
3.
Pursuant to Development Code Section 3.20.070, all retail sales are consummated at the place of
business of the retailer, unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer or his or
her agent to an out -of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out -of-state destination.
The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the
state sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no
permanent place of business in the state or has more than one place of business, the place or places at
which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be
prescribed and adopted by the state board of equalization.
4.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
5.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 19
Project #: DRC2024-00378
Project Name: 11555 Arrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11555 ARROW RTE - 022911164-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
6.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
7.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
8.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
9.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 3Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 20
Project #: DRC2024-00378
Project Name: 11555 Arrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11555 ARROW RTE - 022911164-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
10.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
11.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code
regulations.
12.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
2.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 3Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 21
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2024-00379, A REQUEST TO
PERMIT WHOLESALE AND DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING,
E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION/ FULFILLMENT, AND STORAGE
WAREHOUSE USES AT AN EXISTING INDUSTIRAL BUILDING
THAT CONSISTS OF 331,872 SQUARE FEET AND IS
CURRENTLY OCCUPIED WITH A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING
WHOLESALE AND DISTRIBUTION USE WITHIN THE NEO-
INDUSTRIAL (NI) ZONE AND THE NEO-INDUSTRIAL
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION AT 11599 ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229-111-65.
A.Recitals.
1.The Applicant, Kimley Horn, on behalf of the property owner Rancho Cucamonga !!
Inc, filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2024-00379, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is
referred to as "the application."
2.On the 14th day of May 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 14, 2025, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The project site consists of approximately 14.50 acres of land developed with a
331,872 square foot industrial buildng and is located on the south side of Arrow Route and the
north side of Jersey Boulevard between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue; and
b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit D
Page 22
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-016
DRC2024-00379 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The uses are consistent with the General Plan designation, Neo-Industrial
Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts
and the growth of creative and innovative industries and new businesses. The fully improved site
is developed with an existing 331,872 square foot industrial building. Upon approval of the
requested Conditional Use Permit, wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce
distribution/fulfillment, and storage warehouse uses will have minimal impact on adjacent uses
and properties as the Conditional Use Permit will support the entitlement of uses that are intended
for the zoning district and General Plan land use designation in addition to being with consistent
with the surrounding uses. The uses are consistent with the General Plan.
b.The uses are consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and
purposes of the applicable zone as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations and
standards. Wholesale and Distribution – Medium and Storage Warehouse uses are permitted in
the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Manufacturing, Light
–Large and E-Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center uses are permitted within the Neo-
Industrial (NI) Zone upon the approval of a Minor Use Permit. The latter uses permitted under the
Minor Use Permit will be permitted through the Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of
consolidation of applications. The site is currently legal non-conforming due to the adoption of
Ordinance 982 as the wholesale and disitribution use previously was permitted by right in the
zone, but now require a Conditional Use Permit. The uses are consistent with the zoning
designation and development code in that the uses do not propose new development or
expansion of the existing building and site and they remain consistent with the current
development pattern and uses in the adjacent properties and zone. The Development Code has
specific regulations and performance standards in relation to noise, vibrations, particulate matter
and air containminants, odor, and humidity, heat, and glare, which are applied to the operations
of industrial uses. The conditions of approval included can mitigate any potential impacts that the
facililty may cause. The site is not subject to any specific plans. The uses meet the regulations
and standards applied to Wholesale and Distribution – Medium, Storage Warehouse,
Manufacturing, Light – Large, and E-Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center uses and therefore
is consistent with the Development Code.
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
South Food
Processing/Manufacturing
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
East E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West
E-Commerce
Distribution/Fulfillment /
Wholesale and
Distribution
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
Page 23
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-016
DRC2024-00379 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 3
c.The site is suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the uses. The site is
improved with an existing industrial building, access and circulation, parking, utilities, and
landscaping. No changes are proposed to the site except for potential tenant improvements which
will not increase the building footprint that may be submitted for by a new tenant. The uses are
similar in intensity to existing uses in the immediate surrounding area. No additional physical
constraints have been added that may impede the operation of the existing surrounding land use
nor the proposed land use. Therefore, the project site is well-suited for the uses.
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the uses would be
compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and
service facilities. The uses will operate within an existing industrial building and will not operate
beyond the project parcel nor onto the property of adjacent similar uses. The intensity of the uses
are not expected to exceed the intensity of adjacent similar uses.
e.Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the
vicinity in which the project is located. The scale and operation of the uses are similar to adjacent
uses and will not negatively impact the normal operations of any of the surrounding uses. The
uses have been conditioned to meet performance criteria, safety standards, maintenance
standards and all other Municipal Code standards to mitigate any potential impacts related to the
wholesale and distribution, manufacturing, e-commerce distribution/fulfillment, and storage
warehouse uses.
f.The uses will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire,
streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service
due to the uses. The uses do not pose any undue burdens in that all uses are consistent with the
zone in which they are located and will not require additional service from streets and utilities as
there are no physical changes proposed to the site. The uses do not authorize any operations
which may result in additional service requests from Fire or Police that are not normally associated
with similar adjacent existing uses.
4.The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project
qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing
Facilities, which includes the permitting and leasing of existing private structures. The Conditional
Use Permit will permit Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Manufacturing, Light - Large, E-
Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center, and Storage Warehouse uses where no alterations
proposed to the exterior of the building or site will take place.
The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neo-Industrial
Employment District and Neo-Industrial, respectively, which conditionally permits Wholesale and
Distribution – Medium and Storage Warehouse uses. Manufacturing, Light – Large and E-
Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large uses are also conditionally permitted, but
through a Minor Use Permit. The latter two (2) uses can be approved under the purview of the
Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of consolidation of applications. The project complies with
the City’s development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, and design
requirements as the proposed uses are to occur within an existing building. The project site is
located within the City limits and is surrounded on all four (4) sides by existing industrial buildings
and uses. No physical expansion is proposed as part of this project.
Page 24
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-016
DRC2024-00379 – Kimley Horn
May 14, 2025
Page 4
The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption,
and based on its own independent judgement, concurs in the staff determination of exemption.
5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 25
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2024-00379
Project Name: 11599 Arrrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11599 ARROW RTE - 022911165-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The Conditional Use Permit authorizes use of the existing 331,872 square foot warehouse building for a
distribution/fulfillment center, manufacturing, a storage warehouse, and/or wholesale and distribution
within the Neo-Industrial (NI) zone, located at 11599 Arrow Route; APN: 0229-111-65.
1.
The Conditional Use Permit does not authorize outdoor storage of materials. Any future requests for
outdoor storage shall be subject to a Minor Use Permit.
2.
All current and future uses on the site shall comply with the performance standards outlined in Chapter
17.66 of the Development Code, specifically the performance standards outlined for industrial uses.
3.
Pursuant to Development Code Section 3.20.070, all retail sales are consummated at the place of
business of the retailer, unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer or his or
her agent to an out -of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out -of-state destination.
The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the
state sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no
permanent place of business in the state or has more than one place of business, the place or places at
which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be
prescribed and adopted by the state board of equalization.
4.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
5.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 26
Project #: DRC2024-00379
Project Name: 11599 Arrrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11599 ARROW RTE - 022911165-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
6.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
7.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
8.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
9.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 3Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 27
Project #: DRC2024-00379
Project Name: 11599 Arrrow Route CUP Request
Location: 11599 ARROW RTE - 022911165-0000
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
10.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
11.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code
regulations.
12.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
2.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 3Printed: 5/8/2025
Page 28
DATE:May 14, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW – STUDIO ROCA
– A request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on
4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the
terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone, Hillside
Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The
project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024-
00174).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution of approval for Design
Review DRC2024-00174, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
The related Tentative Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September
12, 1990 (Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 90-114), authorizing the subdivision of
the 4.78-acre site into eight single-family residential lots and the extension of the public street,
Camelia Court. The Final Map was subsequently approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992
(City Council Resolution of Approval 92-171). The current application pertains solely to the design
and construction of the proposed residences on the previously approved lots. No changes to the
previously approved tentative map are proposed.
The 4.78-acre project area, consisting of 8 individual legal parcels is located at the terminus of
Camellia Court, east of Beryl Street. The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet
east-west and 700 feet north-south, with a significant topographic slope of about 49 feet from
northeast (2,179 feet) to southwest (2,130 feet). Vegetation along the perimeter is routinely
cleared in accordance with fire protection regulations.
The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent
properties are as follows:
Page 29
Page 2 of 7
2
8
0
0
ANALYSIS:
Project Design and Layout
The project consists of eight single-family residences on individual, previously approved lots, all
accessed via a previously approved extension of the existing public street, Camellia Court, in
accordance with the approved final tract map. Although the final map was approved prior to the
adoption of the current 200-foot lot depth requirement within the subject VL zone, each lot
maintains a minimum depth of approximately 150 feet, consistent with the development standards
in effect at the time of approval of the final map. All lots exceed 20,000 square feet in area, meeting
the current minimum lot size required to keep horses.
Potential corral locations have been identified for each lot pursuant to Development Code Section
17.120.020-4g. Due to the significant grade changes at the rear of some properties, stairs will be
constructed to facilitate access to the equestrian trail for maintenance purposes. For lots where
direct equestrian trail access is not feasible, a shared access trail will be provided between Lots
4 and 5, ensuring continuous connectivity to the larger equestrian trail network.
Figure 1: Site/Landscape Plan
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
North Single-Family
Residences Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
West Single-Family
Residences Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
Page 30
Page 3 of 7
2
8
0
0
Architecture
The proposed residences feature a contemporary interpretation of traditional architectural styles,
blending classic forms with modern materials and detailing. Each home incorporates a variety of
finish materials and color schemes to create visual interest and architectural distinction throughout
the development. Building materials include stucco, wood-look cementitious siding in both vertical
and horizontal applications, stone veneer accents, standing seam metal roofing, and frosted glass
and metal garage doors. This combination of textures and finishes contributes to a cohesive yet
varied streetscape, enhancing the neighborhood’s overall character and aesthetic appeal.
Figure 2: Colored Elevation
House Size and Configuration
The proposed residences range in size from 4,256 square feet for single-story homes to 5,584
square feet for two-story homes. The project includes two single-story and six two-story
residences, meeting the 25 percent single-story requirement in accordance with Development
Code Section 17.17.122.1-a. Each home is designed with a four-car garage that offers sufficient
space to accommodate both passenger and recreational vehicle parking. The site layout has been
planned to allow for the future development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on each lot,
although no ADUs are currently proposed.
Compliance with Development Standards
The project was designed in compliance with development requirements for the Very Low
Residential (VL) Zone and the Hillside Overlay as outlined in Development Code Table 17.36.010-
1A (Development Standards for Residential Zones and Section 17.144.020 (Hillside
Development) as shown in the following table:
Page 31
Page 4 of 7
2
8
0
0
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TABLE
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies
Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES
Front Setback 42 Feet
Plus or Minus 5 Feet 37 – 45 Feet YES
Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES
Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES
Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES
Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting regarding the design of the eight houses was held on January 9, 2025,
at 6:00 p.m. at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. The developer notified property owners within
a 660-foot radius of the project site in advance of the meeting. Approximately 30 community
members attended, along with the applicant’s team and the project planner.
During the meeting, the applicant presented the proposed project and addressed community
questions related to traffic impacts, cul-de-sac length, sewer connections, sidewalk installation,
house sizes, equestrian access, and preservation of views. The applicant noted that the
subdivision, including the street extension, was originally approved over 30 years ago and that
the fire department had reviewed and approved site access at that time.
In addition, the applicant confirmed that the new homes would connect to the existing sewer
system on Beryl Street. This extension will provide an opportunity for existing homes on Camelia
Court—currently served by individual septic systems—to connect to the public sewer system.
Design Review Committee
The proposed residential development was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC –
Daniels and Boling) on February 18, 2025. Staff provided an overview of the project, and the
Committee raised questions regarding equestrian trails, overall site design, garage dimensions,
and the project’s sewer connection.
In response, the applicant explained that equestrian trails would be developed in conformance
with the approved tract map along the perimeter of the project site, with planned connections to
the existing trail network. They also noted that the garages would be designed to accommodate
Page 32
Page 5 of 7
2
8
0
0
recreational vehicles in addition to multiple passenger vehicles. Furthermore, the applicant
confirmed that the project is required to connect to the existing sewer system on Beryl Street. A
new sewer line will be installed through Camelia Court, creating an opportunity for existing homes
along that street to connect to the public sewer system.
Committee members expressed support for the layout of the residences on the approved lots and
architectural design. Following the discussion, the Committee voted to advance the project to the
full Planning Commission for a final decision.
Public Art
In accordance with Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, residential projects with a density
of less than four dwelling units per acre are exempt from the requirement to provide public art.
The proposed project has a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre, which qualifies it for this
exemption.
Environmental Assessment
Planning staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project
qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill
Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences on an
approved subdivision of a 4.78-acre site.
The Class 32 exemption applies to infill developments on sites less than five acres in size that
are consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, and which would not result in
significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water.
To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 exemption report was prepared by CSG
Consultants, Inc. in April 2025, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City (refer to
Exhibit D – CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption
documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant
environmental impacts, including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality,
or water.
The Planning Director has reviewed and considered staff’s findings and, exercising independent
judgment, concurs with the determination that the project qualifies for a categorical exemption
under CEQA.
Correspondence
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 28, 2025, the property was posted on April 30, 2025, and
notices were mailed to 90 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 29,
2025. On May 1, 2025, an email was received from a resident (Nicole Myerchin) which has been
included as Exhibit E to this staff report. The email raised a number of questions and concerns
which are summarized below with staff’s responses.
Page 33
Page 6 of 7
2
8
0
0
1. Neighborhood Compatibility. Ms. Myerchin disputes that the proposed development is
compatible with the existing neighborhood, specifically citing the size of garages, number
of bedrooms and the number of two-story to single-story residences. Staff has determined
that the project complies with the Hillside Design Review and Building Design requirements
of the Development Code. The proposed homes reflect a high-quality architectural design,
featuring a cohesive palette, durable materials, and consistent detailing, which together
promote visual compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The City does not regulate
house size beyond established lot coverage and setback standards. There are no
standards that limit the number of bedrooms or maximum number of garage parking spaces
within a single-family development.
2. Cul-de-Sac Length and Emergency Egress. Ms. Myerchin states that the cul-de-sac is too
long for emergency vehicle response and egress. The cul-de-sac extension was approved
as part of the original final map in 1990, including review at that time by the Fire District,
which has since reconfirmed emergency access adequacy.
3. Pedestrian Safety and Sidewalks. Ms. Myerchin expressed concerns about increased
traffic resulting from the extension of Camelia Court to form a cul-de-sac, as well as the
lack of sidewalks on the existing, developed portion of the street. The project will result in
additional vehicle trips; however, the extension is designed in accordance with City
engineering standards and is intended to improve circulation by eliminating the current
dead-end condition. The developer is responsible for installing sidewalks, curbs, and
gutters within the boundaries of the approved tract map. Improvements to the existing
portion of Camelia Court, which lies outside the project boundary, and cannot be required
under the nexus provisions of state law as part of this development. All vehicles and
pedestrians using the street will remain subject to applicable traffic regulations and safety
laws.
4. Stormwater Runoff and Flooding. Ms. Myerchin raises questions about additional water
runoff and concern of flooding for existing homes on the south side of the street. The
development will include on-site drainage improvements designed in accordance with City
engineering standards. The proposed stormwater management plan has undergone
technical review and received preliminary approval from the Engineering Department.
5. Water Supply and Fire Protection. Ms. Myerchin asks about adequate water pressure for
fire protection purposes.. Water pressure and fire flow requirements have been evaluated
and deemed adequate, as confirmed in a letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District
dated May 1, 2024. Further, the project has received preliminary approval from the Fire
Department who has raised no questions regarding water supply and fire protection.
6. Equestrian Access. Ms. Myerchin raises concerns regarding continued horse trail access.
The letter indicates that equestrians may be accessing the Heritage Park equestrian arena
across a portion of the project site that, while informally used by equestrian riders, is not
designated as an equestrian trail on the approved final map. The approved trail network,
as reflected in the final map, includes an extension of the existing equestrian trail easement
located behind the homes on the south side of Camelia Court and routes around the project
site. Although the approved alignment requires equestrian users to travel around the
development, it maintains continuous access and does not obstruct trail connectivity.
Furthermore, the trail will be developed to all required city standards.
Page 34
Page 7 of 7
2
8
0
0
7. Wildlife Habitat. Ms. Myerchin expresses disappointment regarding the loss of open space
for wildlife. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a
biological assessment was conducted as part of the project’s environmental review. The
assessment identified standard conditions of approval, including pre-construction surveys
for nesting birds and burrowing owls prior to grading activities—measures that are
commonly required for development projects within the City. The project site is privately
owned and designated for residential development under the City’s General Plan. No
special habitat protections apply beyond the standard CEQA requirements identified in the
biological assessment.
8. Construction Impacts. Ms. Myerchin is concerned about construction impacts on quality of
life. Short-term construction impacts are temporary and will be regulated through conditions
addressing noise, dust control, and restrictions on the days and hours of construction
activities per City code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project site is currently subject to annual property taxes, a portion of which is allocated to the
City. With the development of the eight single-family residences, the assessed value of the
property is expected to increase, resulting in a corresponding increase in the City’s annual share
of property tax revenue, which is currently $0.05 per $1 in property tax assessed.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed project supports several of the City Council’s core values, including the
commitment to providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all residents and preserving a
family-oriented atmosphere. By adding eight well-designed single-family homes on an
underutilized parcel, the development contributes to the City's goal of responsible growth while
helping to address the ongoing need for for-sale housing. The project represents a thoughtful infill
opportunity that enhances neighborhood character and supports long-term community vitality.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Project Location
Exhibit B – Project Plans
Exhibit C – DRC Comments and Minutes Dated February 18, 2025
Exhibit D – Link to CEQA 15332 Infill Exemption
Exhibit E – Email from Resident dated May 1, 2025
Exhibit F – Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval
Page 35
Exhibit A
Project Location
Page 36
EXHIBIT B
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
Project Plans
Page 37
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
February 18, 2025
7:00 p.m.
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW – STUDIO ROCA – A request for site
plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously
approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential
(VL) Zone and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a
Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects
(Design Review DRC2024-00174).
Background:
Tentative Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990,
for the subdivision of a 4.78-acre project site into 8 single-family lots. The City Council approved
the final map on June 3, 1992. The current development application pertains solely to the
construction of the proposed residences and does not propose any modifications to the approved
map.
Site Characteristics:
The 4.78-acre project site is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, west of Beryl Street. The
irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet from east to west and 700 feet from north
to south. The site slopes from north to south, with elevations ranging from 2,179 feet at the
northeast corner to 2,130 feet at the southwest corner, reflecting a grade change of approximately
49 feet. The site perimeter has been cleared of vegetation for fire protection purposes.
The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent
properties are as follows:
Project Design and Layout:
The project consists of 8 single-family residences accessed via an extension of the existing public
street (Camellia Court), pursuant to the approved final tract map. As the project site lies within the
Equestrian Overlay, each lot includes access to an equestrian trail, accessible from either the
individual lots and/or Camellia Court.
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Land Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
North Single-Family
Residences Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
West Single-Family
Residences Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
Exhibit C
Page 38
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
February 18, 2025
Page 2
The subdivision was finalized prior to the implementation of the current 200-foot lot depth
requirement; however, each lot maintains a minimum depth of approximately 150 feet, consistent
with the standards in place at the time of final map approval.
Each lot exceeds 20,000 square feet in area, meeting the minimum size required for equestrian
use. The applicant has delineated potential corral areas on individual lots. Given the substantial
grade changes in the rear yards, stairs will provide access to the equestrian trail for maintenance
and usability. Due to substandard lot depths (under current requirements) and large grades,
equestrian access on some lots will be provided via an equestrian trail between Lots 4 and 5,
connecting to Camellia Court.
Figure 1: Site/Landscape Plan
Architecture:
The residences incorporate a contemporary interpretation of traditional architectural design,
integrating variations in finish materials and color. Building materials include stucco, wood-look
cementitious vertical and horizontal siding, stone veneer, standing seam metal roofs, and frosted
glass garage doors. This modern take on traditional architecture blends classic design elements
with contemporary materials and finishes, creating visually appealing and functional homes that
seamlessly integrate into the surrounding neighborhood.
Each residence features a spacious four-car garage, thoughtfully designed to accommodate the
parking of recreational vehicles, providing homeowners with added convenience and flexibility.
The inclusion of these oversized garages ensures that residents have ample space for vehicle
storage while maintaining the aesthetic integrity of the development.
Page 39
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
February 18, 2025
Page 3
Furthermore, the layout of the homes has been carefully planned to allow for future expansion,
including the potential incorporation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). While ADUs are not part
of the current application, the design accommodates their possible addition, offering residents the
opportunity in the future.
Figure 2: Colored Elevations
House Size and Configuration:
The residences range from 4,256 square feet (single-story) to 5,584 square feet (two-story), with
2 single-story and 6 two-story residences, thereby satisfying the 25% single-story requirement
per Development Code Section 17.17.122.1-a. Each residence includes a 4-car garage of
sufficient dimensions to accommodate a recreational vehicle. Potential accessory dwelling unit
(ADU) locations are indicated on lots with single-story floor plans; however, ADUs are not included
in the current application.
Compliance with Development Standards:
The project was designed in compliance with development requirements for the Very Low
Residential (VL) Zone and the hillside overlay as outlined in Development Code Table 17.36.010-
1A (Development Standards for Residential Zones and Section 17.144.020 (Hillside
Development) as shown in the following table:
Page 40
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
February 18, 2025
Page 4
COMPLIANCE TABLE
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies
Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES
Front Setback 42 Feet
Plus or Minus 5 Feet 37 – 45 Feet YES
Side Yard Setback
10/15 Feet
10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES
Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES
Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES
Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES
Neighborhood Meeting:
A neighborhood meeting was held at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School on January 9, 2025, at
6:00 p.m. The developer notified property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site.
Approximately 30 community members attended, along with the applicant’s team and the project
planner. The applicant presented the project and addressed questions concerning traffic, cul-de-
sac length, sewer connections, sidewalks, house sizes, equestrian access, and views. The
applicant clarified that the subdivision was approved over 30 years ago, with the fire department
approving access at the time of approval. Staff Recommendation: Based on the project's compliance with zoning regulations, thoughtful
architectural design, and future flexibility for ADUs, staff recommends approval of the proposed
development. The project meets all development requirements and is consistent with the General
Plan vision for the development of infill lots. Staff requests that the Design Review Committee
consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and
recommend the selected action below:
☒Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
☐Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating
revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The
revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning
Commission.
Page 41
DRC COMMENTS
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
February 18, 2025
Page 5
☐Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions
requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions
shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by
the Planning Director / Planning Commission.
☐Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant.
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
Members Present:
Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Principal Planner
Exhibit A – Project Plans
Page 42
Design Review Committee Meeting Agenda
February 18, 2025
DRAFT MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
New Time: 6:00 p.m.
A. Call to Order
The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on February 18, 2025. The meeting was called to
order by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:02 p.m.
Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chairman Boling and Commissioner Daniels
Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
B. Public Communications
Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments,
closed public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1.
Consideration to adopt Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2024.
Item C1. Motion carried 2-0 vote as presented.
D. Project Review Items
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW – STUDIO ROCA – A request for site
plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously
approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential
(VL) Zone and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a
Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects
(Design Review DRC2024-00174).
The Committee members raised several questions related to trails, overall design, the interior
dimensions of the garages, and the project’s connection to the sewer system.
The applicant clarified that equestrian trails would be constructed along the perimeter of the
project site, with planned connections to the existing trail network. They also stated that the
garages would be designed to accommodate recreational vehicles as well as multiple
passenger vehicles. Additionally, the project is required to connect to the existing sewer system
located on Beryl Street. A new sewer line will be installed through Camelia Court, providing the
opportunity for existing homes along Camelia Court to connect to the sewer system.
Committee members expressed support for the site layout and architectural design. Following
the discussion, the Committee voted to advance the project to the full Planning Commission
for a final decision.
Recommended approval to PC. 2-0 Vote.
Page 43
E. Adjournment
Principal Planner McPherson adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Page 44
EXHIBIT D
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
CEQA 15332 Infill Exemption
Page 45
Exhibit E
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2024-00174, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW
OF 8 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND ON A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP (TRACT 14644) AT THE
TERMINUS OF CAMELLIA COURT IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL
(VL) ZONE AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31.
A.Recitals.
1.Studio Roca filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2024-00174, as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review
request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 14th day of May 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on May 14, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.The 4.78-acre project site is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, east of
Beryl Street; and
b.The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet from east to west and
700 feet from north to south. The site slopes from north to south, with elevations ranging from 2,179
feet at the northeast corner to 2,130 feet at the southwest corner, reflecting a grade change of
approximately 49 feet; and
c.The subject design review is related to Tentative Tract Map 14644, which was
approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990 (Planning Commission Resolution
of Approval 90-114), authorizing the subdivision of the 4.78-acre site into eight single-family
residential lots. The Final Map was subsequently approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992
(City Council Resolution of Approval 92-171). The current application pertains solely to the design
and construction of the proposed residences. No changes to the previously approved tentative map
are proposed; and
d.The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site
and adjacent properties are as follows:
Exhibit F
Page 49
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
May 14, 2025
Page 2
e.Approval is for the design review and site layout of 8 single-family residences; and
f.The project complies with each of the development standards for the Very Low
(VL) Conventional Zone as shown in the following table:
COMPLIANCE TABLE
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies
Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES
Front Setback 42 Feet
Plus or Minus 5 Feet 37 – 45 Feet YES
Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES
Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES
Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES
Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Land Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
North Single-Family
Residences Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility
Corridor
West Single-Family
Residences Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL)
Page 50
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
May 14, 2025
Page 3
3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a.The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which designates the
project site as Semi-Rural Neighborhood. This designation permits the development of single-family
residences at a maximum density of up to six units per acre. The project proposes eight single-
family residences, resulting in a density of 1.67 units per acre, which is well within the allowable
density range; and
b.The proposed use is in alignment with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project site is situated within the
Very Low (VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay. The Very Low Residential District is
intended for single-family residences at a maximum density of two dwelling units per acre. The
proposed project, with a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre, complies with the zoning district
requirements and supports the district’s objectives; and
c.The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code.
Located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay, the project adheres
to the relevant development standards outlined in the code. All requirements, including those
related to setbacks, lot sizes, and design standards, have been met; and
d.The proposed use, together with the conditions of approval, will not be detrimental to
public health, safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity. A CEQA Section 15332 exemption was prepared for the project, demonstrating that it
will not result in significant environmental impacts related to biological resources, traffic, noise, air
quality, or water.
4.The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA
Guidelines. The project qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section
15332 – Infill Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences
on a 4.78-acre site.
The Class 32 exemption applies to infill developments on sites less than five acres in size that are
consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, and which would not result in significant
impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water.
To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 exemption report was prepared by CSG
Consultants, Inc. in April 2025, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City (refer to Exhibit
D – CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation
and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts,
including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, and air quality. The Planning
Commission reviewed staff’s determination of exemption and based on their independent judgment,
concurs with staff's determination of exemption.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in
the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Page 51
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014
DR DRC2024-00174 – STUDIO ROCA
May 14, 2025
Page 4
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 14th day of May 2023, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 52
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply to all the Conditions of Approval included in the Section 15332 Categorical
Exemption Memorandum dated April 16, 2025 attached as Exhibit D to the approval for
DRC2024-00174.
1.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
2.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 53
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
3.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
4.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
5.
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
6.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, and all
other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance .
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 54
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines ), rather than wood
fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency.
8.
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
9.
The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals
where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in
subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards
of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs.
10.
The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners '
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the
City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building
Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The
Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of
their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes.
11.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner ,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
12.
Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay
deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that
equestrian access is maintained through step -throughs in accordance with Engineering Services
Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B.
13.
Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails ,
construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split -face
double sided block, ‘slump stone’ or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review
Committee.
14.
Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property
owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least
30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter.
15.
For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and
occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted
by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
16.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 55
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
17.
All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope,
shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control .
Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the
developer prior to occupancy.
18.
All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope
shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one
15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each
100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in
vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250
sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope
plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed
by the developer prior to occupancy.
19.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic
Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Library Impact Fee
Animal Center Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
Park In-Lieu / Park Impact Fee
Park Improvement Impact Fee
Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee
1.
Standard Conditions of Approval
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be
installed as required by the City Engineer.
2.
A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its
right-of-way.
3.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 56
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way:
City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department
Cucamonga Valley Water District
San Bernardino County Flood Control
4.
This tract is required to be annexed into CFD 2022-01 district (Street Lighting Services) to finance the
maintenance and services of streetlights, traffic lights, and appurtenant facilities. This condition needs to
be completed before the Final Map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Any
annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. To start the annexation process, please contact Kelly
Guerra at 909-774-2582
5.
Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name : Camellia Street
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
EquestrianTrail
Note: Sidewalk to be constructed to property line adjacent.
6.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits ,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be
provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the
construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
e. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
f. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check.
7.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 57
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name
Botanical Name
Common Name
Min. Grow Space
Spacing
Size
Qty.
Construction Notes for Street Trees :
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
8.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
9.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.10.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements
shall be provided as required.
11.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks
associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this
project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan .
The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 58
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
The site/project is located in the designated Wildland -Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction materials
and methods are required to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section
R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. Please include this note on
the plans. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section of this case file in the
Online Permit Center.
2.
The site/project is located in the designated Wildland -Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this
note on the plans. A site -specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The
fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section. The fire protection plan is required to be submitted and
approved prior to the Fire District approving the project as a whole.
3.
The site/project is located in the designated Wildland -Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this
note on the plans. Landscaping, vegetation management, fuel reduction, and other wildland fire safety
features and practices are required to comply with all applicable provisions of the Fire Protection Plan
and Vegetation Management and Landscaping sections
of Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. A complete
and approved defensible space plan is required prior to the Fire District approving the project as a
whole.
4.
The approved fire protection plan is required to be recorded on the parcel. Upload proof of recording to
this project file and notify the Fire District of recording by sending an email with verification to
RCFire@CityofRC.us
5.
Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with
noncombustible 4-inch tall numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or
externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When
building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be
displayed at the property entry.
6.
Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access
roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction
Services.
The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and /or other approved documents shall be recorded and
contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method
of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the
maintenance of all required fire access roadways.
7.
Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system (s)
shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
8.
All requirements of the FPP or the RCFPD Standard must be completed before an occupancy release
may be granted.
9.
On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the
proposed project site.
10.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 59
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the
site. Building Permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved.
11.
Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the
required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property
shall not be used to provide required fire flow.
12.
The Current editions of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance, the California Residential Code
and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be
installed in all Buildings with R and U occupancy fire areas. All structures must be equipped with
automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D, 13R or 13.
13.
Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and
location of fire hydrants:
a.For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design
& installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards.
b.If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant
measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public
fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided.
c.Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof.
14.
Single-family residential sales model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water
supply from a public or private water main system before construction.
15.
Combustible construction materials, including combustible roofing materials, are prohibited from being
onsite prior to a water supply system in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10 being provided in
accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the
Documents section of this project in the Online Permit Center.
16.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
1.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
2.
A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at
the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review.
3.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 60
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
4.
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
5.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for
review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and
Drainage Plan/Permit.
6.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official .
7.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
8.
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative , the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i)The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii)Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii)At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Engineering
Services Department an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly
wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
9.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit".
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan )
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
11.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 61
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
13.
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
14.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office .
15.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
16.
The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a
biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
17.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or
any building permit.
18.
Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
19.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 62
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No .
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements ).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a.Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b.Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c.Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics ), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d.Unless adequate pre -treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity {77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic ); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e.Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular {78} repair or
maintenance activities {79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used
car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f.Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h.The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 63
Project #: DRC2024-00174
Project Name: Alta Loma 8
Location: 14644 TRACT - 106138131-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE –
Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water
drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards
Code:
Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of
development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during
construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following
measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil
runoff on the site .
1.Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site .
2.Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar
disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by
the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga).
3.Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance.
21.
RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE –
Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading
and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water
flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1.Swales.
2.Water collection and disposal systems .
3.French drains.
4.Water retention gardens .
5.Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater
recharge.
Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path.
22.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12Printed: 4/28/2025
Page 64
DATE:May 14, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
Deborah Allen, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Major Projects Program
for Fiscal Year 2025/26.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2025-011, which finds the
Major Projects Program for Fiscal Year 2025/26, in conformity with the adopted General Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Government Code Section 65401 (Exhibit A) requires that the City Council adopt a Capital
Improvements Program outlining the anticipated major improvement projects and programs for
the upcoming fiscal year. This program is incorporated into the annual Major Project Programs
(MPP) that is prepared as part of the budget planning process. Furthermore, the Planning
Commission is required to find that the MPP (Index attached with General Plan references as
Exhibit B) is in accordance with the General Plan. The MPP document includes a General Plan
Policy section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The MPP
is a vital piece of the City’s annual budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in
any given year. The MPP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements.
Each year, the City budgets for funded projects that will occur over the next fiscal year. The list of
projects and programs contained in the MPP addresses both the City’s long and short-term capital
needs spanning a five-year period. It reflects the vision of the community, as well as projects and
programs that serve operational and maintenance needs.
ANALYSIS:
The MPP Summary Index has been categorized by project or program type, corresponding
Department, and title are in alphabetical order within each section. Individual project sheets
include a short summary, cost, and year funded and can be viewed in Exhibit C. The Resolution
(Exhibit D) will find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2025/26, in conformity with
the adopted General Plan Goals and Policies (Exhibit E).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure I,
Gas Tax, state grants, and local funds. The MPP for Fiscal Year 2025-26 proposes 81 projects,
totaling $62,359,116 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year.
Page 65
Page 2 of 2
2
8
2
6
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The City’s Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement
an economically feasible MPP that embodies the City’s public infrastructure needs. This item
addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-quality public
improvements that promote a world-class community and also support the City Council’s Core
Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Government Code 65401
Exhibit B - Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Major Project Program Summary Index Sheet
Exhibit C - MPP Project Sheets
Exhibit D - Resolution 25-011 of Approval for Finding the Major Projects Program for Fiscal Year
2025/26 in Conformity with the Adopted General Plan
Exhibit E - General Plan Goals and Policies
Page 66
5
6
5
1
Government Code
65401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be
fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or
commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the
governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly
or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing
plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as
designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the
proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the
ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall
list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of
proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be
submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official
agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof.
Exhibit A
Page 67
INDEX SHEET MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
No.General Plan Reference Project Manager Project Proponent Department Project Name Fund Name Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Fiscal Year
2029/30
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
DRAINAGE
1 M.A.-3.4, S 1.5 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Hellman and Feron Storm Drain Project Drainage General Fund (F112)226,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 226,940$
Project Total:226,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 226,940$
Drainage Totals: $ 226,940 $- $- $- $- $- $ - $ 226,940
FACILITIES
2 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Veronica Fincher Veronica Fincher Animal Services Animal Center Kennel Project Animal Center Impact Fee (F125)-$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$
3 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Veronica Fincher Veronica Fincher Animal Services Animal Center Play Yard Project Animal Center Impact Fee (F125)-$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$
4 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Central Park Senior & Community Center Carpet Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$
Project Total:-$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$
5 O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Epicenter Sound System Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 135,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 135,000$
Project Total:-$ 135,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 135,000$
6 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services The Resort Joint Use Public Facility Project Com&Rec. Ctr Impact Fee (F113)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,220,000$ -$ 11,220,000$
P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services The Resort Joint Use Public Facility Project Library Impact Fee (F123)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,040,000$ -$ 2,040,000$
P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services The Resort Joint Use Public Facility Project Police Impact Fee (F127)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,740,000$ -$ 3,740,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,000,000$ -$ 17,000,000$
7 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Mike Parmer Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Engagement and Special Programs Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)5,556,752$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,556,752$
P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Mike Parmer Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Engagement and Special Programs Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$
P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Mike Parmer Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Engagement and Special Programs Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign Project Park Improvement Impact Fee (F119)523,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 523,000$
Project Total:7,579,752$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,579,752$
8 S. 1.1 Mike Parmer Mike Smith Engagement and Special Programs RCPD VG Substation Relocation and Expansion Project Law Enforcement Fund (F017)-$ -$ 600,000$ 5,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,000,000$
S. 1.1 Mike Parmer Mike Smith Engagement and Special Programs RCPD VG Substation Relocation and Expansion Project TBD -$ -$ 900,000$ 8,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 1,500,000$ 13,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$
9 S. 1.1 Mike Parmer Mike Smith Engagement and Special Programs RCPD/EOC Facility Improvement and Expansion Project Law Enforcement Fund (F017)153,000$ -$ 5,623,430$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,776,430$
Project Total:153,000$ -$ 5,623,430$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,776,430$
10 P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Amethyst Fire Station 171 Rebuild & Expansion Project Fire Capital Projects (F288)401,460$ 11,836,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,237,460$
P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Amethyst Fire Station 171 Rebuild & Expansion Project Fire Impact Fee (FXXX)-$ 9,684,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,684,000$
Project Total:401,460$ 21,520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,921,460$
11 P.F. 1.1 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Banyan Fire Station 175 ADA Improvements Fire Capital Projects (F288)95,630$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,103,630$
Project Total:95,630$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,103,630$
12 P.F. 1.1 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Day Creek Fire Station 173 ADA Improvements Fire Capital Projects (F288)92,430$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,430$
Project Total:92,430$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,430$
13 P.F. 1.1 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Jersey Fire Station 174 ADA Improvements Fire Capital Projects (F288)92,430$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 92,430$
P.F. 1.1 Darci Vogel Mike McCliman Fire District Jersey Fire Station 174 ADA Improvements CFD 85-1 (F282)-$ 1,608,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,608,000$
Project Total:92,430$ 1,608,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700,430$
14 P.F.-1.1 Angelica Trummell Wessley Garcia Library Services Paul A. Biane Library Infrastructure Project Library Capital Fund (F329)526,620$ 673,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$
Project Total:526,620$ 673,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$
15 L.C. 1.1, P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Cara Vera Wessley Garcia Library Services Westside Library Expansion Project Library Capital Fund (F329)15,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$
L.C. 1.1, P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Cara Vera Wessley Garcia Library Services Westside Library Expansion Project Community Benefit Fund (F030)5,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000,000$
L.C. 1.1, P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Cara Vera Wessley Garcia Library Services Westside Library Expansion Project Library Impact Fee (F123)1,100,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ 5,232,500$ -$ -$ 7,032,500$
L.C. 1.1, P.F. 1.1, P.F. 1.4 Cara Vera Wessley Garcia Library Services Westside Library Expansion Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)835,690$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 835,690$
Project Total:21,935,690$ 700,000$ -$ -$ 5,232,500$ -$ -$ 27,868,190$
16 P.F 1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Central Park Courtyard Improvement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 660,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 660,000$
Project Total:-$ 660,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 660,000$
17 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Public Works Central Park Service Bay Gate and Operator Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 115,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 115,000$
Project Total:-$ 115,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 115,000$
18 P.F 1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works City Hall and Council Chambers Glass Entry Door Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 150,000$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 290,000$
Project Total:-$ 150,000$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 290,000$
19 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Shelly Munson Public Works City Hall Server Room Data Air Units Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 185,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 185,000$
Project Total:-$ 185,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 185,000$
20 P.F -1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide - HVAC & Lighting Controls Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)137,000$ 1,652,000$ 1,767,000$ 2,042,000$ 1,826,000$ 1,936,000$ -$ 9,360,000$
Project Total:137,000$ 1,652,000$ 1,767,000$ 2,042,000$ 1,826,000$ 1,936,000$ -$ 9,360,000$
21 P.F 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project PD 85 Redemption Fund (F848)545,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 545,700$
P.F 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project LMD 1-Capital Rplcmt (F141)152,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 152,000$
P.F 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project LMD 10 (F140)384,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 384,000$
P.F 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)1,384,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,384,300$
P.F 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project LMD 9 (F139)-$ 1,440,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$
Project Total:2,466,000$ 1,440,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,906,000$
22 P.F. 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Parking Deck Resurface and Restripe Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 60,000$ 660,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 720,000$
Project Total:-$ 60,000$ 660,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 720,000$
23 P.F. 1.4 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Public Safety Parking Garage Gate Replacement Project Law Enforcement Fund (F017)-$ 105,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 105,000$
Project Total:-$ 105,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 105,000$
24 P.F -1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Sewer Line Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 75,000$ 825,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$
Project Total:-$ 75,000$ 825,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$
25 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Civic Center Waterproofing and Roof Repairs Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)2,234,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,234,760$
Project Total:2,234,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,234,760$
26 RC-7.1 Andy Miller Richard Favela Public Works Corporate Yard Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)1,460,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,460,000$
Project Total:1,460,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,460,000$
27 P.F.-1.1, P.F. 4.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Council Chambers Carpeting & Seating Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)243,925$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 243,925$
Project Total:243,925$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 243,925$
28 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Darci Vogel Public Works Fire Stations 173, 174, 175, 176, and 177 Painting Project Fire Capital Projects (F288)75,000$ 300,000$ 405,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 780,000$
Project Total:75,000$ 300,000$ 405,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 780,000$
29 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works Quakes Stadium Bowl Waterproofing Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)427,220$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,077,220$
Exhibit B
Page 68
INDEX SHEET MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
No.General Plan Reference Project Manager Project Proponent Department Project Name Fund Name Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Fiscal Year
2029/30
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Project Total:427,220$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,077,220$
30 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Daniel Akers Public Works Quakes Stadium Exterior Concourse Upgrade Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ -$ 726,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 726,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 726,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 726,000$
31 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Mike Parmer Public Works Quakes Stadium Painting Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ -$ -$ 1,475,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,475,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ 1,475,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,475,000$
32 P.F 1.1 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Quakes Stadium Upgrades Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 1,602,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,602,000$
Project Total:-$ 1,602,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,602,000$
33 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works RC Sports Center Sewer Line Improvement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)35,000$ 503,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,850$
Project Total:35,000$ 503,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,850$
34 P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Wessley Garcia / Public Works Various City and Fire District Roof Repairs Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 345,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 345,000$
P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Mike McCliman Public Works Various City and Fire District Roof Repairs Fire Capital Projects (F288)22,125$ 103,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,625$
P.F. 1.1 Andy Miller Wessley Garcia / Mike McClimanPublic Works Various City and Fire District Roof Repairs General Fund (F001)25,375$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,375$
Project Total:47,500$ 448,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 496,000$
35 PF-1.1 Andy Miller Andy Miller Public Works VGCC A/C Package Unit Replacement Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 100,000$ 1,375,000$ 605,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,080,000$
Project Total:-$ 100,000$ 1,375,000$ 605,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,080,000$
Facilities Totals: $ 38,003,417 $ 34,918,730 $ 13,221,430 $ 17,622,000 $ 7,158,500 $ 18,936,000 $ - $ 129,860,077
MISCELLANEOUS
36 P.F. 7 Michael Scott Shelly Munson Dept. of Innovation and Technology City Data Network Infrastructure Refresh Project Equip/Tech Replcmt Fund (F714)-$ 1,825,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,825,000$
P.F. 7 Michael Scott Shelly Munson Department of Innovation and TechnologyCity Data Network Infrastructure Refresh Project Fire Capital Projects (F288)-$ 1,825,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,825,000$
Project Total:-$ 3,650,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,650,000$
37 S 1.7, S 3.7 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs Wildfire Early Detection System Project State Grants Fund (F274)1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$
Project Total:1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$
Miscellaneous Totals: $ 1,900,000 $ 3,650,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,550,000
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
38 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RC Fiber Extension - Amethyst Avenue Fire Capital Projects (F288)-$ 2,500$ 77,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$
P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RC Fiber Extension - Amethyst Avenue Fiber Optic Network (F711)-$ 2,500$ 77,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$
Project Total:-$ 5,000$ 155,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$
39 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Distribution Project - The Resort Parkway North Municipal Utility (F705)17,000$ 25,000$ 17,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 84,000$
P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Distribution Project - The Resort Parkway North Fiber Optic Network (F711)3,000$ 5,000$ 3,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16,000$
Project Total:20,000$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$
40 P.F.-7.1, P.F. 7.2 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Electric Substations - Southeast Industrial and Etiwanda Heights Municipal Utility (F705)15,000$ 200,000$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$
P.F.-7.1, P.F. 7.2 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Electric Substations - Southeast Industrial and Etiwanda Heights TBD -$ -$ 20,000,000$ 20,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000,000$
Project Total:15,000$ 200,000$ 20,045,000$ 20,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 40,260,000$
41 S. 1.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Electrical Outage Response Improvement Project Municipal Utility (F705)300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$
Project Total:300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$
42 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Line Extension Project - Etiwanda Heights Municipal Utility (F705)-$ 450,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,450,000$
Project Total:-$ 450,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,450,000$
43 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Line Extension Project - Etiwanda North Phase 2 Municipal Utility (F705)10,000$ -$ 1,687,090$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,697,090$
Project Total:10,000$ -$ 1,687,090$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,697,090$
44 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs RCMU Line Extension Project - Milliken Avenue South of Jersey Boulevard Municipal Utility (F705)-$ 10,000$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,610,000$
Project Total:-$ 10,000$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,610,000$
45 P.F.-7.1 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs Utility Equipment Replacement Program Capital Replacement Fund (F708)30,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,030,000$
Project Total:-$ 30,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ 4,030,000$
Municipal Utilities Totals: $ 345,000 $ 725,000 $ 26,707,090 $ 23,830,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 53,607,090
PARKS
46 O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Civic Center Area Park Project Park Land Impact Fee (F111)-$ -$ -$ 7,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 7,000,000$
O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Civic Center Area Park Project Park Improvement Impact Fee (F119)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ 600,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ 7,000,000$ -$ 600,000$ -$ 7,600,000$
47 O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Don Tiburcio Tapia Park Project Park Improvement Impact Fee (F119)-$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 4,200,000$ -$ 4,550,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 4,200,000$ -$ 4,550,000$
48 O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services East Side Area Park Development Project Park Land Impact Fee (F111)-$ -$ 6,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,600,000$
O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services East Side Area Park Development Project Park Improvement Impact Fee (F119)-$ -$ -$ 520,000$ 6,240,000$ -$ -$ 6,760,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 6,600,000$ 520,000$ 6,240,000$ -$ -$ 13,360,000$
49 O.S. 1.1, O.S. 1.7 Ted Morales Jennifer Hunt-Gracia Community Services Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase 2 Project Park Improvement Impact Fee (F119)-$ -$ -$ -$ 870,000$ 10,440,000$ -$ 11,310,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ 870,000$ 10,440,000$ -$ 11,310,000$
50 O.S. 2.2, O.S.2.3 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead and Park Project Federal Grants Fund (F275)1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$
O.S. 2.2, O.S.2.3 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead and Park Project Park Development Fund (F120)808,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 808,400$
O.S. 2.2, O.S.2.3 Mike Parmer Mike Parmer Engagement and Special Programs Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead and Park Project Fire Capital Projects (F288)200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$
Project Total:2,008,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,008,400$
51 O.S. 2.1, M.A. 3.1 Lelani Gnaster Jason Welday Engineering Services Day Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements Phase 3 Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ 74,000$ 666,000$ -$ -$ -$ 740,000$
O.S. 2.1, M.A. 3.1 Lelani Gnaster Jason Welday Engineering Services Day Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements Phase 3 Project TBD -$ -$ 176,000$ 1,584,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,760,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 250,000$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$
52 O.S. 2.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project PD 85 Redemption Fund (F848)108,109$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 108,109$
O.S. 2.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project PD 85-Capital Rplcmt (F847)20,035$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,035$
O.S. 2.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project Fire Capital Projects (F288)801,283$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 801,283$
O.S. 2.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)1,184,773$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,184,773$
O.S. 2.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$
Project Total:2,864,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,864,200$
53 P.F. 1.4 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Citywide Site Lighting Repairs and Upgrades Program LMD 2 (F131)-$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 350,000$ 850,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 350,000$ -$ 850,000$
54 OS-1.5 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works LMD 2 Park Upgrades RIRE Grant Project LMD 2 (F131)50,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$
Project Total:50,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$
55 O.S 1.3 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Parks Playground and Surfacing Replacements Program LMD 2 (F131)450,000$ -$ 800,000$ -$ 800,000$ 2,050,000$
O.S 1.3 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Parks Playground and Surfacing Replacements Program LMD 4 (F134)-$ 800,000$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ 2,400,000$
Page 69
INDEX SHEET MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
No.General Plan Reference Project Manager Project Proponent Department Project Name Fund Name Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Fiscal Year
2029/30
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Project Total:-$ 450,000$ 800,000$ 800,000$ 800,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 4,450,000$
56 R.C. 2.6, R.C. 7.13 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project PD 85-Capital Rplcmt (F847)39,360$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,360$
R.C. 2.6, R.C. 7.13 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project PD 85 Redemption Fund (F848)-$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$
R.C. 2.6, R.C. 7.13 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Red Hill South Beautification Project Capital Reserve Fund (F025)-$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$
Project Total:39,360$ 1,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,839,360$
57 R.C 2.5, R.C. 2.6 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation Landscape Renovation Program LMD 2 (F131)120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$
R.C 2.5, R.C. 2.6 Daniel Akers Daniel Akers Public Works Water Conservation Landscape Renovation Program LMD 4 (F134)100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$
Project Total:-$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$
Parks Totals: $ 4,961,960 $ 2,670,000 $ 7,650,000 $ 10,820,000 $ 8,510,000 $ 17,190,000 $ - $ 51,801,960
STREETS
58 M.A. 2.3, M.A. 3.2 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing Transportation Fund (F124)100,600$ 302,500$ 165,000$ 403,500$ -$ -$ -$ 971,600$
M.A. 2.3, M.A. 3.2 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing Industrial Area Traffic Fund (F199)-$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$
M.A. 2.3, M.A. 3.2 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing Municipal Utility (F705)-$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$
Project Total:100,600$ 302,500$ 165,000$ 1,603,500$ -$ -$ -$ 2,171,600$
59 M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.2 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Almond Street Improvements Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)93,000$ 1,850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,943,000$
Project Total:93,000$ 1,850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,943,000$
60 M.A. 3.1 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Banyan Street and East Avenue Improvement Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)-$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$
M.A. 3.1 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Banyan Street and East Avenue Improvement Project Measure I Fund (F177)-$ -$ 2,223,350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,223,350$
Project Total:-$ 100,000$ 2,223,350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,323,350$
61 M.A. 3.1 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Banyan Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Enhancements Project Measure I Fund (F177)-$ -$ 154,880$ 1,971,200$ -$ -$ -$ 2,126,080$
M.A. 3.1 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Banyan Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Enhancements Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ 65,120$ 828,800$ -$ -$ -$ 893,920$
Project Total:-$ -$ 220,000$ 2,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,020,000$
62 M.A. 3.1 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Base Line Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ 59,200$ 439,560$ -$ -$ -$ 498,760$
M.A. 3.1 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Base Line Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project TBD -$ -$ 140,800$ 1,045,440$ -$ -$ -$ 1,186,240$
Project Total:-$ -$ 200,000$ 1,485,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,685,000$
63 M.A. 3.1 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Church Street Buffered Bike Lanes Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ -$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$
M.A. 3.1 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Church Street Buffered Bike Lanes Project TBD -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,680,000$ -$ -$ 1,680,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 1,680,000$ -$ -$ 1,840,000$
64 M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.3 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services City Center Boulevards Project Federal Grants Fund (F275)-$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,000,000$
M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.3 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services City Center Boulevards Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ 390,000$ -$ 10,656,000$ 17,168,000$ 17,168,000$ -$ 45,382,000$
M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.3 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services City Center Boulevards Project TBD -$ -$ -$ 25,344,000$ 40,832,000$ 40,832,000$ -$ 107,008,000$
Project Total:-$ 3,390,000$ -$ 36,000,000$ 58,000,000$ 58,000,000$ -$ 155,390,000$
65 M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.3 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Civic Center Drive Improvement Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)-$ 298,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 298,000$
M.A.-2.1, M.A.-2.3 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Civic Center Drive Improvement Project State Grants Fund (F274)-$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$
Project Total:-$ 648,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 648,000$
66 MA-2.1, MA-2.2 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services East Avenue and Highland Avenue Roundabout Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 3,190,000$ -$ 3,540,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 3,190,000$ -$ 3,540,000$
67 M.A-3.4, S 1.5 Lelani Gnaster Jason Welday Engineering Services Etiwanda Creek Bridges Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ 1,200,000$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,200,000$
Project Total:-$ 1,200,000$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,200,000$
68 MA 2.3 ,M.A. 2.7. M.A. 3.2 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Etiwanda East Side Widening Project Transportation Fund (F124)423,000$ 1,370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,793,000$
Project Total:423,000$ 1,370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,793,000$
69 M.A. 3.1 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project State Grants Fund (F274)-$ -$ 348,816$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 348,816$
M.A. 3.1 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project AB 2766 Air Qual Imprv Fund (F105)-$ 41,000$ 97,784$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 138,784$
Project Total:-$ 41,000$ 446,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 487,600$
70 M.A.2.1, M.A.2.3 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Haven Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project Ped Grant/Art3 Fund (F214)227,192$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,192$
M.A.2.1, M.A.2.3 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Haven Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project AB 2766 Air Qual Imprv Fund (F105)258,968$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 258,968$
Project Total:486,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 486,160$
71 M.A. 3.1 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services Jasper Street Pedestrian Improvements Project Measure I Fund (F177)-$ -$ 279,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 279,500$
Project Total:-$ -$ 279,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 279,500$
72 P.F. 1.4 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services Local Streets Paving Program Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (F174)1,517,500$ 2,345,000$ 2,462,500$ 2,580,000$ 2,697,500$ 11,602,500$
P.F. 1.4 Sarine Hazarshahian Jason Welday Engineering Services Local Streets Paving Program Measure I Fund (F177)1,517,500$ 2,345,000$ 2,462,500$ 2,580,000$ 2,697,500$ 11,602,500$
Project Total:-$ 3,035,000$ 4,690,000$ 4,925,000$ 5,160,000$ 5,395,000$ -$ 23,205,000$
73 P.F. 1.4 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Major Arterial Paving Program Road Maintenance & Rehab (F179)4,140,000$ 4,605,000$ 5,587,500$ 3,465,000$ 3,815,000$ 21,612,500$
Project Total:-$ 4,140,000$ 4,605,000$ 5,587,500$ 3,465,000$ 3,815,000$ -$ 21,612,500$
74 P.F. 1.4 Romeo David Jason Welday Engineering Services Pecan Avenue Street Improvements Project Measure I Fund (F177)-$ 1,774,886$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,774,886$
Project Total:-$ 1,774,886$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,774,886$
75 M.A. 3.1 Lelani Gnaster Jason Welday Engineering Services Southwest Cucamonga Safe Routes to School Project Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ -$ 118,400$ 1,346,800$ -$ -$ 1,465,200$
M.A. 3.1 Lelani Gnaster Jason Welday Engineering Services Southwest Cucamonga Safe Routes to School Project TBD -$ -$ -$ 281,600$ 3,203,200$ -$ -$ 3,484,800$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 4,550,000$ -$ -$ 4,950,000$
76 M.A.-2.3 ,M.A.-2.7. M.A. 3.2 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Terra Vista Parkway and Town Center Drive Roundabout Transportation Fund (F124)-$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 3,615,000$ -$ 3,865,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 3,615,000$ -$ 3,865,000$
77 P.F. 1.4 Vishal Lad Jason Welday Engineering Services Whittram Avenue Street Improvement Project Infrastructure Fund (F198)-$ -$ 355,000$ 3,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,955,000$
Project Total:-$ -$ 355,000$ 3,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,955,000$
78 P.F. 1.4 Jason Martin / Jason Martin / Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program General Fund (F001)470,000$ 792,000$ 477,500$ 477,500$ 425,000$ 2,642,000$
P.F. 1.4 John Standi John Standi Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program Measure I Fund (F177)100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$
P.F. 1.4 Jason Martin / John Standi Jason Martin / John Standi Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (F174)370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 370,000$
P.F. 1.4 Jason Martin / John Standi Jason Martin / John Standi Public Works Citywide Concrete Repair Program Community Dev Block Grant (F204)500,000$ -$ 550,000$ -$ 320,000$ 1,370,000$
Project Total:-$ 1,440,000$ 892,000$ 1,127,500$ 577,500$ 845,000$ -$ 4,882,000$
Streets Totals: $ 1,102,760 $ 19,291,386 $ 26,076,450 $ 57,688,500 $ 74,032,500 $ 74,860,000 $ - $ 253,051,596
TRAFFIC
79 M.A.-5.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Advanced Traffic Management System Program Transportation Fund (F124)500,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 20,500,000$
M.A.-5.4 Krystal Lai Jason Welday Engineering Services Advanced Traffic Management System Program Federal Grants Fund (F275)-$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$
Project Total:-$ 500,000$ 6,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ -$ 21,500,000$
80 M.A. 3.1 Alberto Felix Jason Welday Engineering Services Hermosa Avenue / Arrow Route Flashing Yellow Arrow Project Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (F174)-$ 47,000$ 453,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$
Page 70
INDEX SHEET MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) - FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
No.General Plan Reference Project Manager Project Proponent Department Project Name Fund Name Prior Year
Funding
Fiscal Year
2025/26
Fiscal Year
2026/27
Fiscal Year
2027/28
Fiscal Year
2028/29
Fiscal Year
2029/30
Future
Years
Total Project
Cost
Project Total:-$ 47,000$ 453,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$
81 P.F. 1.4 Alberto Felix Jason Welday Engineering Services Local Roadway Safety Plan Improvements Program State Grants Fund (F274)501,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 501,000$
P.F. 1.4 Alberto Felix Jason Welday Engineering Services Local Roadway Safety Plan Improvements Program Measure I Fund (F177)56,000$ 93,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$ -$ 599,000$
P.F. 1.4 Alberto Felix Jason Welday Engineering Services Local Roadway Safety Plan Improvements Program TBD -$ 371,700$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ 2,621,700$
Project Total:-$ 557,000$ 464,700$ 150,000$ 2,550,000$ -$ -$ 3,721,700$
Traffic Totals: $ - $ 1,104,000 $ 6,917,700 $ 5,150,000 $ 7,550,000 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 25,721,700
Grand Total 46,540,077$ 62,359,116$ 84,572,670$ 115,110,500$ 98,251,000$ 116,986,000$ -$ 523,819,363$
Page 71
EXHIBIT C
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
FY2025-26 MPP Project Sheets
Page 72
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM THAT IS INCORPORATED
INTO THE MAJOR PROJECTS PROGRAM (MPP) FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025/26 IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65103 (c) and 65401 of the State of California Government
Code, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) that is
incorporated into the Major Projects Program (MPP) for Fiscal Year 2025/26 as to its consistency with
the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the CIP that is incorporated into the MPP was reviewed in accordance with the
criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State CEQA Guidelines.
Approval of the Capital Improvement Plan included in the MPP is exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Section 15061(b)(3), Section 15306, Class 6, and 15378(b)(4) of State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, under Section 15061(b)(3), these actions involve the adoption of a CIP and no
specific development is authorized by its adoption. Furthermore, the MPP is a prioritizing and funding
allocation program and cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the
environment. No physical activity will occur until all required environmental review is conducted at the
time the physical improvements prioritized in the MPP are undertaken at a future, unspecified date.
Therefore, the approval of the MPP does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. The MPP is covered by the “common sense” CEQA exemption because it can be seen
with certainty that the guidance would not result in a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the project is Categorically Exempt (Section 15306-Class 6) from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Section 15306, Class 6, exemption consists of basic
data collection, research, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major
disturbance to an environmental resource; and
WHEREAS, approval of the MPP is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the Plan is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, but
involves the creation of government planning mechanism or other government fiscal activities that do
not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical
impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the analysis and recommendations of
Engineering Services Department staff, contained in their Staff Report dated May 14, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND that the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, finds the Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) that is incorporated into the Major Projects Program (MPP) for
Fiscal Year 2025/26 in conformity with the adopted General Plan.
Exhibit D
Page 73
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF MAY 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: _____________________________________
Tony Morales, Chairman
ATTEST:__________________________________
Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 14th day of May 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Page 1 of 1
Page 74
i
City of Rancho Cucamonga
GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL
LC-1
A CITY OF PLACES.
A beautiful city with a diversity and balance of unique and well-connected places.
LC-1.1 Complete Places. Ensure that a broad range of recreational,
commercial, educational, arts, cultural, and civic amenities are nearby and
easily accessible to residents and workers in each neighborhood and each
employment district.
LC-1.2 Quality of Place. Ensure that new infill development is compatible
with the existing, historic, and envisioned future character and scale of each
neighborhood.
LC-1.3 Quality of Public Space. Require that new development incorporate
the adjacent street and open space network into their design to soften the
transition between private and public realm and creating a greener more
human-scale experience.
LC-1.4 Connectivity and Mobility. Work to complete a network of
pedestrian- and bike-friendly streets and trails, designed in concert with adjacent
land uses, using the public realm to provide more access options.
LC-1.5 Master Planning. When planning a site, there must be meaningful
efforts to master plan the site so as to ensure a well-structured network and block
pattern with sufficient access and connectivity to achieve the placemaking goals
of this General Plan.
LC-1.6 Disadvantaged Communities. Prioritize development appropriate
to the needs of disadvantaged communities, particularly south of Foothill
Boulevard.
LC-1.7 Design for Safety. Require the use of Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) techniques such as providing clear lines of sight,
appropriate lighting, and wayfinding signs to ensure that new development is
visible from public areas and easy to navigate.
LC-1-8 Public Art. Require new construction to integrate public art in
accordance with the City Public Arts Program.
LC-1.9 Infill Development. Enable and encourage infill development within
vacant and underutilized properties through flexible design requirements and
potential incentives.
LAND USE & COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Exhibit E
Page 75
iiiii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
LC-1.10 Development Incentives. Consider incentives for new development
that provides substantial economic and placemaking benefit to the community
and prohibit the provision of incentives that outweigh the direct benefits of the
development and its use.
LC-1.11 Compatible Development. Allow flexibility in density and intensity
to address specific site conditions and ensure compatibility of new development
with adjacent context.
LC-1.12 Adaptive Reuse. Support the adaptive reuse of historic properties
consistent with neighborhood character.
LC-1.13 Improved Public Realm. Require that new development extend
the “walkable public realm” into previously vacant and/or parking lot-dominant
large single-use parcels of land.
LC-1.14 Street Amenities and Lighting. Modify pedestrian and street
amenities, lighting styles and intensities to be compatible with the character of
the surrounding neighborhoods.
LC-1.15 Historic Route 66. Build on the history and significance of Historic
Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) by incorporating design features, such as public
art, signage, and architecture, that reflect its history and heritage.
LC-1.16 Healthy Development. Ensure that the design and development
of our communities supports the health and well-being of our residents. Use the
Healthy Development Checklist, or similar assessment tool, to assess the overall
health performance and supportiveness of new development projects.
GOAL
LC-2
HUMAN SCALED.
A city planned and designed for people fostering social and economic interaction,
an active and vital public realm, and high levels of public safety and comfort.
LC-2.1 Building Orientation. Require that buildings be sited near the street
and organized with the more active functions —entries, lobbies, bike parking,
offices, employee break rooms and outdoor lunch areas—facing toward and
prominently visible from the street and visitor parking areas.
LC-2.2 Active Frontages. Require new development abutting streets and
other public spaces to face the public realm with attractive building facades,
and entries to encourage walking, biking, and public transit as primary—not
“alternative”—mobility modes.
LC-2.3 Streetscape. Enhance the pedestrian experience through streetscape
improvements such as enhanced street lighting, street trees, and easement
dedications to increase the widths of the sidewalks, provide side access parking
lanes, and other pedestrian and access amenities.
LC-2.4 Tree Planting. Require the planting of predominantly native and
drought-tolerant trees that shade the sidewalks, buffer pedestrians from traffic,
define the public spaces of streets, and moderate high temperatures and wind
speeds throughout the city.
LC-2.5 Gradual Transitions. Where adjacent to existing and planned
residential housing, require that new development of a larger form or intensity,
transition gradually to complement the adjacent residential uses.
LC-2.6 Commercial Requirements. Require development projects in non-
residential and mixed-use areas to provide for enhanced pedestrian activity
through the following techniques:
• Require that the ground floor of buildings where retail uses are allowed
have a minimum 15 feet floor to floor height.
• Require that the ground floor of the building occupy the majority of the lot’s
front, with exceptions for vehicular access where necessary.
• Require that most of the linear ground floor retail frontage (where such
occurs) be visually and physically “open” to the street, incorporating
windows and other design treatments to create an engaging street front.
• Minimize vehicle movements across the sidewalk.
• Allow for and encourage the development of outdoor plazas and dining
areas.
LC-2.7 Shared Parking. Encourage structured and shared parking solutions
that ensure that parking lots do not dominate street fronts and are screened
from public views whenever possible.
LC-2.8 Landscaping. Require development projects to incorporate high
quality, predominantly native and drought-tolerant landscaping to extend and
enhance the green space network of the city.
LC-2.9 Buffer Zones. Require development projects to incorporate buffer
zones when determined to be necessary or desirable to serve as managed
open space for wildfire safety and vegetation fuel modification.
LC-2.10 Pedestrian-Oriented Auto-Dependent Uses. Require auto
dependent uses such as drive-throughs, car washes, automobile service
stations, and similar auto-focused businesses, to be designed with buildings
oriented toward the primary street and the auto-servicing use/activity in
the rear. Prohibit auto-dependent uses from locating in pedestrian-priority
environments, such as City Centers, Traditional Town Centers, and all
Neighborhoods.
EXHIBIT E
Page 76
viv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-3
FISCALLY SUSTAINABLE.
A fiscally sound and sustainable City.
LC-2.11 Park-Once. Allow and encourage strategies that enable adjacent
uses and properties to flexibly share parking facilities, so that users can park
once and pursue multiple activities on foot before returning to their car, such as:
• Unbundling parking from development.
• Considering parking “districts” demonstrating sufficient parking within a
convenient walking distance.
• Design parking facilities to be architecturally compatible and integrated
with adjacent buildings so as to not dominate or detract from the character
of the area.
LC-3.1 Community Value. Actively manage growth and investments in the
community to maximize the value of new development, seeking value-per-acre
outcomes of up to six times higher.
LC-3.2 Community Benefit. Require a community benefit and economic
analysis for large projects that abut existing neighborhoods or for any project at
the maximum density, with a focus on resolving physical, economic, long-term
fiscal, and aesthetic impacts.
LC-3.3 Community Amenities. Balance the impacts of new development,
density, and urbanization through the provision of a high-level of neighborhood
and community amenities and design features.
LC-3.4 Institutional Land Uses. Site new institutional land uses based on
all forms of access available to the service population. Satellite offices that are
disbursed in the community may be necessary to ensure equitable access.
LC-3.5 Efficient Growth. Manage growth in a manner that is fiscally
sustainable, paced with the availability of infrastructure, and protects and/
or enhances community value. Discourage growth and development that will
impact the City’s ability to sustainably maintain infrastructure and services.
LC-3.6 Diverse Economy. Guide development and public investments to
maintain a fiscally sound city with a diverse and sustainable tax base.
LC-3.7 Developing Our Economy. Actively promote and encourage
opportunities for local economic development, education, housing, locally
hiring, internships and employment from cradle to career so as to increase
resident retention, improve and grow a strong local economy, achieve a positive
jobs-housing match; retain critical educational resources and human capital,
reduce regional commuting, gas consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
and ensure equitable opportunities for all residents of the City and region to
thrive.
LC-3.8 Jobs-housing match. Encourage new employment generating uses
and businesses that improve the jobs-housing match in the city.
LC-3.9 Infrastructure Funding. Actively investigate and support new
funding mechanisms that enable the City to maintain services and infrastructure.
Discourage the formation of bonded Community Facilities Districts unless there
are compelling and substantial wide-spread community benefits.
LC-3.10 Economic Synergy. Encourage businesses and development
that will support and/or enhance the operations of existing businesses when
complimentary to the General Plan Vision while discouraging new development
and businesses that will have detrimental impacts to existing businesses and
development.
GOAL
LC-4
COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS.
A diverse range of unique neighborhoods, each of which provides an equitable
range of housing types and choices with a mix of amenities and services that
support active, healthy lifestyles.
LC-4.1 Neighborhood Preservation. Preserve and enhance the character
of existing residential neighborhoods.
LC-4.2 Complete Neighborhoods. Strive to ensure that all new
neighborhoods, and infill development within or adjacent to existing
neighborhoods, are complete and well-structured such that the physical layout,
and land use mix promote walking to services, biking and transit use, and have
the following characteristics:
• Be organized into human-scale, walkable blocks, with a high level of
connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles.
• Be organized in relation to one or more focal activity centers, such as a
park, school, civic building, or neighborhood retail, such that most homes
are no further than one-quarter mile.
• Require development patterns such that 60 percent of dwelling units are
within 1/2-mile walking distance to neighborhood goods and services.
• Provide as wide a diversity of housing styles and types as possible, and
appropriate to the existing neighborhood context.
• Provide homes with entries and windows facing the street, with driveways
and garages generally deemphasized in the streetscape composition.
LC-4.3 Connected Neighborhoods. Require that each new increment
of residential development make all possible street, trail, and open space
connections to existing adjoining residential or commercial development and
provide for future connections into any adjoining parcels.
EXHIBIT E
Page 77
viivi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-5
CONNECTED CORRIDORS.
A citywide network of transportation and open space corridors that provides a
high level of connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, motorists, and
transit users.
LC-4.4 Balanced Neighborhoods. Within the density ranges and housing
types defined in this General Plan, promote a range of housing and price levels
within each neighborhood to accommodate diverse ages and incomes.
LC-4.5 Equitable Housing Opportunities and Diversity of Housing
Types. Within the density ranges and housing types defined in this General
Plan, promote a diversity of land tenure opportunities to provide a range of
choices on the types of property estate available and ready access to an
equitable array of opportunities at a variety of price points. For projects five
acres or larger, require that diverse housing types be provided and intermixed
rather than segregated by dwelling type.
LC-4.6 Block Length. Require new neighborhoods to be designed with blocks
no longer than 600 feet nor a perimeter exceeding 1,800 feet. Exceptions can
be made if mid-block pedestrian and bicycle connections are provided, or if the
neighborhood is on the edge of town and is intended to have a rural or semi-
rural design character.
LC-4.7 Intersection Density. Require new neighborhoods to provide
high levels of intersection density. Neighborhood Center and Semi-Rural
Neighborhoods should provide approximately 400 intersections per square
mile. Suburban Neighborhoods should provide at least 200 intersections per
square mile.
LC-4.8 Solar Orientation. Street, block, and lot layouts should orient a
majority of lots within 20 degrees of a north-south orientation for increased
energy conservation.
LC-4.9 Public Art. Encourage public art that reflects the culture, history, and
character of the surrounding neighborhood.
LC-4.10 Minimize Curb Cuts. Require new commercial development, and
residential to the extent possible, to have common driveways and/or service
lanes and alleys serving multiple units, to minimize the number of curb cuts
along any given block to improve pedestrian safety.
LC-4.11 Neighborhood Transitions. Require that new neighborhoods
provide appropriate transitions in scale, building type and density between
different General Plan designations, Place Types and Community Planning
Areas.
LC-4.12 Conventional Suburban Neighborhood Design. Discourage
the construction of new residential neighborhoods that are characterized by
sound walls on any streets, discontinuous cul-de-sac street patterns, long block
lengths, single building and housing types, and lack of walking or biking access
to parks, schools, goods, and services.
LC-4.13 Neighborhood Edges. Encourage neighborhood edges along
street corridors to be characterized by active frontages, whether single-family or
multifamily residential, or by ground floor, neighborhood-service non-residential
uses. Where this is not possible due to existing development patterns or
envisioned streetscape character, neighborhood edges shall be designed based
on the following policies:
• Strongly discourage the construction of new gated communities except in
Semi-Rural Neighborhoods.
• Allow the use of sound walls to buffer new neighborhoods from existing
sources of noise pollution such as railroads and limited access roadways.
Consider sound walls as sites for public art.
• Prohibit the use of sound walls to buffer residential areas from arterial or
collector streets. Instead design approaches such as building setbacks,
landscaping and other techniques shall be used.
• In the case where sound walls might be acceptable, require pedestrian
access points to improve access from the Neighborhoods to nearby
commercial, educational, and recreational amenities, activity centers and
transit stops.
• Discourage the use of signs to distinguish one residential project from
another. Strive for neighborhoods to blend seamlessly into one another. If
provided, gateways should be landmarks and urban design focal points, not
advertisements for home builders.
LC-5.1 Improved Street Network. Systematically extend and complete
a network of complete streets to ensure a high-level of multi-modal connectivity
within and between adjacent Neighborhoods, Centers and Districts. Plan and
implement targeted improvements to the quality and number of pedestrian and
bicycle routes within the street and trail network, prioritizing connections to
schools, parks, and neighborhood activity centers.
LC-5.2 Connections Between Development Projects. Require
the continuation and connectivity of the street network between adjacent
development projects and discourage the use of cul-de-sacs or other dead-end
routes.
EXHIBIT E
Page 78
ixviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
LC-7
ROBUST DISTRICTS.
A series of unique, employment-oriented environments for a range of business
activities, shopping and entertainment, arts and culture activities, and community
events and gathering.
LC-5.3 Green Public Realm. Ensure that a significant tree canopy and
landscaping is provided along corridors, and linkages between land uses, to
provide shade and wind protection for pedestrians and bicyclists, and to define
these corridors as the “outdoor living rooms” of the City.
LC-5.4 Multi Family Development. Focus new multifamily housing
development along corridors between commercial nodes and centers and
ensure that it is well-connected to adjoining neighborhoods and centers by high
quality walking and biking routes.
LC-5.5 Foothill Boulevard as a Gateway. Transform the ends of Foothill
Boulevard near the city boundary to a unique gateway environment through
street improvements and coordinated infill development along both sides of
Foothill Boulevard.
LC-5.6 Foothill Boulevard as a Connector. Transition Foothill Boulevard
from a “divider” to a “connector” that brings the north and south sides together.
Ensure that new development along the Foothill Corridor generates a high-
quality pedestrian- and transit-oriented environment and a concentration of
commercial and civic amenities and community gathering places for residents
from all parts of the city.
LC-5.7 Public Arts Master Plan. Develop a citywide master plan that
integrates the arts into the transportation, trails, open space and greenways
network to enhance the public realm and creatively connect communities
through innovative arts and cultural amenities and programming.
LC-5.8 Equestrian Uses. Continue to protect equestrian uses and to
implement the Equestrian Overlay Zone.
GOAL
LC-6
ACTIVE CENTERS.
A rich variety of commercial and mixed-use centers throughout the city, which
bring a range of opportunities for shopping, dining, recreations, commerce,
employment, arts and culture within easy reach of all neighborhoods.
LC-6.1 Diverse Centers. Encourage the development of neighborhood-
serving, community-serving and city-wide serving centers that address the full
range community needs and market sectors.
LC-6.2 Small Scale Centers. Support one or more very small-scale Centers
on well-located under-developed parcels within walking, biking, or horseback
riding distance of neighborhoods in Alta Loma and Etiwanda.
LC-6.3 Evolving Centers. Encourage the improvement of existing
commercial centers to provide more active, human scale environments and
community gathering places, including the potential for infill housing and office
use.
LC-6.4 Access to Transit. Encourage the development of commercial and
mixed-use centers that are located at and organized in relation to existing or
planned transit stops, especially along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
LC-6.5 Walkable Environments. Centers should include very walkable and
pedestrian-friendly streets with active building fronts along primary corridors
and internal streets. In some cases, side access lanes may be inserted between
existing major streets and building fronts, providing a low-speed environment
that is very safe and comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists, with pedestrian-
oriented frontages.
LC-6.6 Outdoor Commerce. Encourage outdoor activities such as farmers
markets, small performances, visual arts and culture events, dining, and gatherings
that take advantage of the Centers and the relation to the public realm.
LC-7.1 Gateway & Employment Hub. Establish the Central South
Community Planning Area as the City’s main “gateway from the I-10 Freeway”
and an employment hub of regional significance. Haven Avenue and 4th
Street, in particular, is a significant gateway location that is envisioned as a
higher intensity urban environment with iconic architecture and a mix of uses
that can include luxury or full-service hotel, high rise office building, fine dining
restaurant, and/or a public recreation amenity in addition to higher density
residential uses.
LC-7.2 Unify and Connect Development. Require that new development
in the 21st Century Employment District land use designation unify and connect
development along the Haven Avenue Corridor.
LC-7.3 Campus Design. Encourage employment areas to be developed like
a college campus with buildings oriented toward an internal roadway, buffer
landscaping along the perimeter, and ample opportunities for paths and trails
connecting to the City system, as well as relaxation areas for employees.
LC-7.4 Compatibility. Discourage large industrial projects within 1,000 feet
of existing and planned residential development.
LC-7.5 Adaptive Industrial Reuse. Encourage adaptive reuse with
residential and live/work units, and local serving commercial, in existing
industrial structures, particularly in the Central South Community Planning Area.
LC-7.6 Loading Docks. Require that parking lots, loading docks, outdoor
storage, and processing, be located behind or beside buildings, not in front,
and be screened from public views.
EXHIBIT E
Page 79
xix | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
OS-2
TRAILS.
A complete, connected network of diverse trails and connected open space that
improves access to all areas of the city and encourages non-motorized activities.
OS-1.1 Equitable Access to Parks. Strive to ensure that at least one park
or other public open space is within safe, comfortable walk from homes and
jobs, without crossing major streets except at signalized crossings. Equitable
access to parks should be determined based on the fundamental character
of the place (rural, suburban, urban) and corresponding transportation
infrastructure.
OS-1.2 Underserved Communities. Prioritize the provision of new
trails, parks, plazas, and other open space types in areas of the city that are
underserved by parks, services, and amenities.
OS-1.3 Accessible Parks. Require parks be designed with special attention
to usability by and safety for small children, seniors, and those with mobility,
sight, hearing or other special needs.
OS-1.4 Design Character and Public Art. Require neighborhood
parks, greens, and playgrounds to be designed as an integral element of their
Community Planning Area, reflecting the design character, art, and culture, of
that neighborhood, center or district.
OS-1.5 Design for Safety. Require the use of Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) design techniques such as providing clear lines
of sight, appropriate lighting, and wayfinding signs to ensure that parks are
safe and easy to navigate.
OS-1.6 New Development. Ensure that new residential and non-residential
developments provide adequate on-site recreational and open space amenities
consistent with applicable General Plan Designations, and the needs of new
development.
OS-1.7 New Parks. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that
meet the City standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special
facilities) for every 1,000 persons.
OS-1.8 Central Park. Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the
Central Park Master Plan.
OS-1.9 Joint Use. Pursue and expand joint use of public lands that are
available and suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility properties.
GOAL
OS-1
OPEN SPACE.
A complete, connected network of diverse parks, trails, and rural and natural
open space that support a wide variety of recreational, educational, and outdoor
activities.
OPEN SPACE
OS-1.10 Buffer Zones. Provide buffer zones, as appropriate and necessary,
to serve as managed open space for wildfire safety and vegetation fuel
modification. Buffer zones may include trails, small recreational amenities,
information kiosks and signage, and even staging points for fire vehicles.
OS-1.11 Locally Grown Food. Support small-scale locally grown food in
front/backyard gardens, community gardens, parks/open space areas, and
utility and flood control easements.
OS-2.1 Trail Corridors. Extend, improve and complete the multi-purpose
trail network, wherever possible, by utilizing existing flood control channel and
utility corridor rights-of-way as public trail corridors.
OS-2.2 Connectivity. Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the
San Bernardino National Forest and other hillside open space areas.
OS-2.3 Trailheads. Provide trailhead amenities such as parking, restrooms,
information boards, and maps.
OS-2.4 Equestrian Trails. Continue to maintain and pursue the development
of planned trails and facilities for equestrian use.
OS-2.5 Utility Corridors. Preserve the primary function of utility corridors
while providing every reasonable opportunity for shared public use for active
mobility and recreational purposes.
OS-2.6 Design for Heat. Consider extreme heat in the design of streets,
parks, trails, and playgrounds to support activity throughout the year and in all
weather conditions by including shade trees, shade structures, water fountains,
splash pads, lighting for night play in most spaces.
OS-2.7 Access. Require new development to provide access to existing or
future trails and provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking
fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities).
OS-2.8 Art and Education. Require public art, education, and recreation
features on trails, where appropriate.
OS-2.9 Trail and Park Sponsorship. Support the creation of partnerships
with organizations to sponsor and maintain green spaces, parks, trails, and
community gardens.
EXHIBIT E
Page 80
xiiixii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
MA-1
REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB.
A multimodal transportation hub that connects regional and local destinations.
MOBILITY AND ACCESS
MA-1.1 Transportation Leadership. Take a leadership role in local and
regional transportation related planning and decision making.
MA-1.2 Cucamonga Station Redevelopment. Support redevelopment in
and around the Cucamonga Station to support transit-oriented development.
MA-1.3 Funding. Support federal, statewide, and regional infrastructure
funding for transit and transportation.
MA-1.4 Local Mobility Hub. Require new development at mobility hubs
and key stops along the future bus rapid transit and future transit circulator
system to facilitate first mile/last mile connectivity to neighborhoods.
MA-1.5 Provide Mobility Options. Provide roadway connections and
local mobility hubs designed to capture 80% of the population and employment
south of Base Line Road.
MA-1.6 Boulevard Implementation. Require boulevards with high-quality
transit to not only account for how transit service is impacted by the geometry
of the corridor, but also by signal timing, signal phasing, turns, and other
operations that may jeopardize the quality of service.
GOAL
MA-2
ACCESS FOR ALL.
A safe, efficient, accessible, and equitable transportation system that serves the
mobility needs of all users.
MA-2.1 Complete Streets. Require that new roadways include provisions
for complete streets, balancing the needs of all users of all ages and
capabilities.
MA-2.2 New Streets. To achieve the vision for transportation and mobility in
the city, the final design, location, and alignment of streets shall provide levels
of access, connectivity, and circulation consistent with the conceptual layouts
shown in this Mobility and Access Chapter.
MA-2.3 Street Design. Implement innovative street and intersection designs
to maximize efficiency and safety in the city. Use traffic calming tools to assist
in implementing complete street principles. Possible tools include roundabouts,
curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and separated bicycle infrastructure.
MA-2.4 Street Connectivity. Require connectivity and accessibility to a mix
of land uses that meets residents’ daily needs within walking distance.
MA-2.5 Street Vacations. Prioritize pedestrian and utility connectivity over
street vacations.
MA-2.6 Context. Ensure that complete streets applications integrate the
neighborhood and community identity into the street design. This can include
special provisions for pedestrians and bicycles.
MA-2.7 Roadway Scale. Balance roadway size and design configuration
to ensure that vehicular speeds, volumes and turning movements do not
compromise the safety and comfort of pedestrians and bicyclists.
MA-2.8 Facility Service Levels. Maintain level of service (LOS) D for
priority modes on each street; LOS E or F may be acceptable at intersections
or segments for modes that are not prioritized. The City will develop a list
of intersections and roadways that are protected from this level of service
policy where 1) maintaining the standard would be a disincentive to walking,
biking or transit; 2) constructing facilities would prevent the City from VMT
reduction goals or other priorities, and ; 3) maintaining the standard would be
incompatible with adjacent land uses and built forms.
MA-2.9 High-Quality Pedestrian Environment. Enhance sidewalks
to create a high-quality pedestrian environment, including wider sidewalks,
improved pedestrian crossings, buffers between sidewalks and moving traffic,
pedestrian lighting, wayfinding signage, shade trees, increased availability of
benches, end of cul-de-sac access, etc.
MA-2.10 Block Pattern. Require development projects to arrange streets in
an interconnected block pattern, so that pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers are
not forced onto arterial streets for inter- or intra- neighborhood travel.
MA-2.11 Master Planning. Master plan sites so as to ensure a well-
structured network and block pattern with sufficient access and connectivity;
especially in all focus areas, including the Cucamonga Town Center, Etiwanda
Heights Town Center, and the Southeast Industrial Area.
MA-2.12 Transportation Demand Management. Require new projects
to implement Transportation Demand Management strategies, such as employer
provided transit pass/parking credit, high-speed communications infrastructure
for telecommuting, carpooling incentives, etc.
MA-2.13 Healthy Mobility. Provide pedestrian facilities and class II
buffered bike lanes (or separated bikeways) on auto-priority streets where
feasible to promote active transportation.
MA-2.14 Bicycle Facilities. Enhance bicycle facilities by maintaining and
expanding the bicycle network, providing end-of-trip facilities (bike parking,
lockers, showers), improving bicycle/transit integration, wayfinding signage,
etc.
EXHIBIT E
Page 81
xvxiv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
MA-3
SAFETY.
A transportation network that adapts to changing mobility needs while preserving
sustainable community values.
MA-3.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks. Maintain the Active
Transportation Plan supporting safe routes to school, and a convenient
network of identified pedestrian and bicycle routes with access to major
employment centers, shopping districts, regional transit centers, and residential
neighborhoods.
MA-3.2 Traffic Safety. Prioritize transportation system improvements that
help eliminate traffic-related fatalities and severe injury collisions.
MA-3.3 Vulnerable User Safety. Prioritize pedestrian improvements in the
Pedestrian Priority Area to promote safety in the southwest area of the city.
MA-3.4 Emergency Access. Prioritize development and infrastructure
investments that work to implement, maintain, and enhance emergency access
throughout the community.
GOAL
MA-4
GOODS MOVEMENT.
An efficient goods movement system that ensures timely deliveries without
compromising quality of life, safety and smooth traffic flow for residents and
businesses.
MA-4.1 Truck Network. Avoid designating truck routes that use collector or
local streets that primarily serve residential uses and other sensitive receptors.
MA-4.2 Southeast Area Connectivity. Require new development in the
Southeast Area to provide the necessary infrastructure to maintain access and
public safety.
MA-4.3 Future Logistics Technology. Support and plan for electrification
and autonomy of the truck fleet.
MA-4.4 Rail Access. Avoid abandonment of rail access to industrial parcels
or utilize such right of way to balance and enhance other connectivity goals
within the City (such as pedestrian/bicycle trails).
MA-4.5 Grade Separation. Support the construction of grade separations
of roadways and trails from rail lines.
GOAL
MA-5
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION.
A transportation network that adapts to changing mobility needs.
MA-5.1 Land Use Supporting Reduced VMT. Work to reduce VMT
through land use planning, enhanced transit access, localized attractions, and
access to non-automotive modes.
MA-5.2 Emerging Technologies. Prioritize investments in critical
infrastructure and pilot programs to leverage proven new transportation
technology.
MA-5.3 Funding. Remain flexible in the pursuit and adoption of
transportation funding mechanisms that fund innovative transportation solutions.
MA-5.4 Intelligent Systems Preparation. Upgrade the City’s ATMS
and communications systems to ensure that the City meets the intelligent
transportation system demands of today while planning for future demands
associated with AVs and CVs.
GOAL
H-1
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES.
A diverse community with a broad range of housing types and opportunities to
accommodate expected new households.
HOUSING
H-1.1 RHNA Requirement. Encourage the development of a wide range of
housing options, types, and prices that will enable the City to achieve its share
of the RHNA.
H-1.2 Elderly and Disabled Household Needs. Recognize the unique
characteristics of elderly and disabled households and address their special needs.
H-1.3 Accessory Dwelling Units. Facilitate the development of accessory
dwelling units to provide additional housing opportunities pursuant to State law
and established zoning regulations.
GOAL
H-2
AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
A city where housing opportunities meet the needs of all socioeconomic segments
of the community.
H-2.1 Rental Assistance Programs. Encourage the use of rental
assistance programs to assist lower income households and support the Housing
Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) applications for additional
vouchers to meet the needs of lower income households.
EXHIBIT E
Page 82
xviixvi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
H-3
HOMELESSNESS.
A compassionate community with a wide range of options and support for the
housing insecure and those experiencing homelessness.
H-3.1 Homeless Services. Provide assistance as it becomes available
towards efforts of local organizations and community groups to provide
emergency shelters, transitional housing opportunities, and services to the City’s
homeless population and those at-risk of homelessness.
H-3.2 Homeless Programs. Participate with adjacent communities toward
the provision of a sub-regional shelter program and encourage the County to
develop a comprehensive homeless program.
H-2.2 Mobile Home Park Accord. Support the Mobile Home Park Accord
voluntary rent stabilization as a means of keeping rents at reasonable levels.
GOAL
H-4
HOUSING QUALITY.
A community with quality, healthy housing.
H-4.1 Mills Act Contracts. Encourage rehabilitation and preservation of
historic residences through participation in Mills Act contracts.
H-4.2 Substandard Housing. Encourage the revitalization and
rehabilitation of substandard residential structures.
H-4.3 Residential Rehabilitation. Focus rehabilitation to neighborhoods
with deteriorating units.
H-4.4 Home Improvement Programs. Implement the Home Improvement
Programs to benefit lower income single-family homeowners and mobile
homeowners.
H-4.5 Housing Maintenance. Actively encourage the maintenance of
existing housing in to as to maintain the housing stock in sound condition.
H-4.6 Code Enforcement. Utilize concentrated Code Enforcement programs
to target specific areas or problems when the need and community support
warrants such activity.
GOAL
H-5
GOVERNMENT CONSTRAINTS.
A city with an efficient process for improving and developing housing.
H-5.1 Development Review Processes. Consider new polices, codes,
and procedures that have the potential to reduce procedural delays, provide
information early in the development process regarding development costs,
and charge only those fees necessary to adequately carry out needed public
services and improvements.
H-5.2 Fee Schedule. Periodically review and update the City’s fee schedule
and the methodology on which the fees are based to determine the necessary
costs for providing adequate public services and public improvements to ensure
the continued health, safety, and welfare of the community.
H-5.3 Development Review Process. Facilitate the development review
process for new housing through multiple techniques, including staff assistance,
public information, articles in the City’s newsletter, informal meetings with
applicants, and Preliminary Review applications to address technical issues and
facilitate the production of quality housing.
H-5.4 Development Standards. Evaluate and adjust as appropriate
residential development standards, regulations, and processing procedures
that are determined to constrain housing development, particularly housing
opportunities for lower and moderate income households and for persons with
special needs.
GOAL
H-6
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES.
An equitable community that provides equal housing opportunities for all residents.
H-6.1 Reduce Housing Discrimination. Explore and consider programs
that will reduce the incidence of housing discrimination within the City.
H-6.2 Land Use Plan. Facilitate development projects that will improve a
neighborhood’s access to resources and opportunities.
H-6.3 Fair Housing Outreach and Education. Support outreach and
education efforts to actively further fair housing practices and understanding
of fair housing rights, with emphasis on proactive education and voluntary
compliance, as well as through legal enforcement on a case-by-case basis,
including, but not limited to, assistance with the resolution of tenant/landlord
disputes and housing discrimination complaints.
H-6.4 Accessible or Barrier-Free Housing. Encourage the provisions of
disabled-accessible units and housing for the mentally and physically disabled.
EXHIBIT E
Page 83
xixxviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
PF-1
STATE-OF-THE-ART FACILITIES.
Residents enjoy state-of-the-art public and community facilities that support existing
programs, accommodate future needs, and are accessible to all members of the
community.
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SERVICES
PF-1.1 New Building Standards. Continue to implement high-quality
standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings.
PF-1.2 Underserved Neighborhoods. Prioritize new community facilities
in underserved neighborhoods and centers.
PF-1.3 Facility Collaboration. Maximize public facility use by sharing with
nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look for
opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private
organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs.
PF-1.4 Capital Improvements Program. Coordinate, plan, and
manage a comprehensive capital improvements program for expansion and
improvement of critical facilities and infrastructure in response to the needs of a
growing community.
GOAL
PF-2
EDUCATION.
All residents have access to high-quality educational opportunities.
PF-2.1 Schools. Consider the needs of the school districts that serve Rancho
Cucamonga in future planning and development activities.
PF-2.2 Colleges. Partner with local public and private schools and Chaffey
Community College to maintain effective educational, vocational, and
workforce programs for all residents.
GOAL
PF-3
LIBRARIES.
High-quality library resources are provided to meet the educational, cultural, civic,
and general business needs of all residents.
PF-3.1 Library. Continue to improve the local libraries system, complete with
community facilities that provide knowledgeable, service-oriented staff and
offer access to information, books, and other materials in a variety of formats,
including emerging technologies. Consider future options for providing library
services that are flexible and will maximize library services while keeping costs
affordable.
GOAL
PF-4
ANIMAL CARE.
Animal care and services are provided, including facilitation of adoptions,
promotion of animal health and safety, and animal awareness education.
PF-4.1 Animal Care. Continue to maintain and improve the Animal Care
and Adoption Center facility.
GOAL
PF-5
WATER-RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE.
Water and wastewater infrastructure facilities are available to support future
growth needs and existing development.
PF-5.1 Water Treatment. Support the efforts of the Cucamonga Valley
Water District (CVWD) and San Bernardino County agencies to provide and
expand water treatment facilities to treat local water sources from canyon
surface waters and groundwater.
PF-5.2 Wastewater Treatment. Consult with the Inland Empire Utilities
Agency and CVWD to ensure that the treatment facility has sufficient capacity
to meet future wastewater treatment needs.
PF-5.3 Recycled Water. Work with the CVWD to expand the recycled water
program to include existing private development.
GOAL
PF-6
SOLID WASTE.
The volume of solid waste that enters regional landfills is minimized and the
amount of recycling increased.
PF-6.1 Recycling. Encourage Recycling and Organics collection and
processing in all sectors of the community to divert items from entering landfills.
PF-6.2 Refuse Facilities. Consult with public agencies and private
contractors to ensure adequate organics processing facilities are available.
GOAL
PF-7
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.
Protect and expand utility infrastructure in a sustainable and innovative manner
to serve the current and future needs of the community while ensuring that natural
and environmental resources are available for future generations.
PF-7.1Communications. Expand access to high quality established and
emerging communications technologies for individuals, businesses, educational
institutions, and government functions.
EXHIBIT E
Page 84
xxixx | General Plan Annual Report 2023
PF-7.2 High Speed Internet. Prioritize extending high speed internet into
underserved lower income neighborhoods.
PF-7.3 Utility Equipment. To the extent possible, ensure that utility boxes,
above-ground equipment, and utility entrances to buildings are located at the
rear or side of the building, not the front. Ensure that utility boxes and other
above-ground equipment do not block or impair the safe and effective use of
trails, sidewalks, and streets.
PF-7.4 Planned Streets Segments and Utility Facilities. When
planned street segments, as shown in the Focus Areas and Mobility & Access
chapters, would unreasonably interfere with the primary utility function on utility
owned parcels, allow the final location and design of those street segments to
accommodate the current and prospective utility needs of the community to the
greatest extent possible.
PF-7.5 Secondary (Non-Utility) Uses of Utility Facilities and Sites.
Ensure compatibility of secondary uses on utility owned parcels that are not
related to the primary utility function of utility owned parcels with adjacent land
uses and the utility needs of the community.
PF-7.6 Phasing of Public Facilities. Require new parks, open spaces,
infrastructure, and other facilities be funded by and/or provided by new
development as necessary so as to ensure services can be provided to new
development.
GOAL
RC-1 VISUAL RESOURCES.
A beautiful city with stunning views of the San Gabriel Mountains and the
Inland Empire.
RC-1.1 View Corridors. Protect and preserve existing signature public views
of the mountains and the valleys along roadways, open space corridors, and at
other key locations.
RC-1.2 Orient toward View Corridors. Encourage new development to
orient views toward view corridors, valley and mountains.
RC-1.3 Transfer of Development Rights. Allow the transfer of development
rights from conservation areas to select development areas throughout the city
and Sphere of Influence to protect hillsides, natural resources, and views and to
avoid hazards and further the City’s conservation goals.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
RC-1.4 Dark Sky. Limit light pollution from outdoor sources, especially in the
rural, neighborhood, hillside, and open spaces to maintain darkness for night
sky viewing.
RC-1.5 Transit Corridor Views. Require that new development along major
transit routes and travel corridors include 360-project design and landscape
or design screening of outdoor activity, and storage, including views from the
transit routes and travel corridors.
RC-1.6 Hillside Grading. Grading of hillsides shall be minimized, following
natural landform to the maximum extent possible. Retaining walls shall be
discouraged and if necessary screened from view.
RC-1.7 Preservation of Natural Land Features. Preserve significant
natural features and incorporate into all developments. Such features may
include ridges, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, wetland and
riparian areas, steep topography, important or landmark trees and views.
GOAL
RC-2
WATER RESOURCES.
Reliable, readily available, and sustainable water supplies for the community and
natural environment.
RC-2.1 Water Supplies. Protect lands critical to replenishment of
groundwater supplies and local surface waters.
RC-2.2 Groundwater Recharge. Preserve and enhance the existing system
of stormwater capture for groundwater recharge.
RC-2.3 Riparian Resources. Promote the retention and protection of natural
stream courses from encroachment, erosion, and polluted urban runoff.
RC-2.4 Waterways as Amenities. When considering new development
applications and infrastructure improvements where waterways are on-site,
adjacent, or nearby, incorporate the waterway into the design as a feature.
RC-2.5 Water Conservation. Require the use of cost-effective methods
to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water
conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences.
RC-2.6 Irrigation. Encourage the conversion of water-intensive turf/
landscape areas to landscaping that uses climate- and wildfire-appropriate
native or non-invasive plants, efficient irrigation systems, greywater, and water
efficient site maintenance.
RC-2.7Greywater. Allow and encourage the use of greywater to meet or
offset on-site non-potable water demand.
EXHIBIT E
Page 85
xxiiixxii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-3
HABITAT CONSERVATION.
Wildlife habitats that support various plants, mammals, and other wildlife species.
RC-3.1 Sensitive Habitat. Encourage the preservation of the integrity of
sensitive land resources that have significant native vegetation and/or habitat
value such as riparian habitat areas, creek corridors, Riversidean Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub (RAFSS), wetlands, and sensitive wildlife habitat that supports
biological resources.
RC-3.2 Biological Preserves. Allow and encourage the expansion of
sensitive biological preserve areas (e.g., North Etiwanda Preserve, Day Creek
Preserve, and San Sevaine Preserve) and other important habitat areas with
an emphasis on wildlife connectivity between habitats and connectivity to the
national forest.
RC-3.3 Wildlife Corridors. Encourage the creation, maintenance, and
protection of open space areas that provide strategic wildlife corridors and vital
connectivity between habitat areas.
RC-3.4 Landscape Design. Encourage new development to incorporate
native vegetation materials into landscape plans and prohibit the use of species
known to be invasive according to the California Invasive Plant Inventory.
RC-3.5 Buffers from New Development. Require new developments
adjacent to identified plant and wildlife habitat areas to establish and maintain
a protective buffer.
RC-3.6 Grading and Vegetation Removal. Limit grading and vegetation
removal of new development activities to the minimum extent necessary for
construction and to reduce erosion and sedimentation.
RC-3.7 Urban Forestry Plan. Minimize damage associated with wind- and
fire-related hazards and risks and address climate change and urban heat
island effects through the development of an urban forestry plan that addresses
and proper and appropriate landscaping, plant and tree selection and
replacement, planting and vegetation management techniques.
GOAL
RC-4
CULTURAL RESOURCES.
A community rich with historic and cultural resources.
RC-4.1 Disturbance of Human Remains. In areas where there is a high
chance that human remains may be present, the City will require proposed
projects to conduct a survey to establish occurrence of human remains, and
measures to prevent impacts to human remains if found.
RC-4.2 Discovery of Human Remains. Require that any human remains
discovered during implementation of public and private projects within the city
be treated with respect and dignity and fully comply with the California Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and other appropriate laws.
RC-4.3 Protected Sites. Require sites with significant cultural resources to be
protected.
RC-4.4 Preservation of Historic Resources. Encourage the preservation
of historic resources, buildings, and landscapes.
RC-4.5 Historic Buildings. Encourage the feasible rehabilitation and
adaptive reuse of older buildings.
RC-4.6 Paleontological Resources. Require any paleontological artifacts
found within the city or the Sphere of Influence to be preserved, reported, and
offered for curation at local museums or research facilities.
GOAL
RC-5
LOCAL AIR QUALITY.
Healthy air quality for all residents.
RC-5.1 Pollutant Sources. Minimize increases of new air pollutant emissions
in the city and encourage the use of advance control technologies and clean
manufacturing techniques.
RC-5.2 Air Quality Land Use Compatibility. Avoid siting of homes,
schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities and land uses within 500 feet of land
uses that are considered large emitters.
RC-5.3 Barriers and Buffers. Require design features such as site and
building orientation, trees or other landscaped barriers, artificial barriers,
ventilation and filtration, construction, and operational practices to reduce air
quality impacts during construction and operation of large stationary and mobile
sources.
RC-5.4 Health Risk Assessment. Consider the health impacts of
development of sensitive receptors within 500 feet of a freeway, rail line,
arterial, collector or transit corridor sources using health risk assessments to
understand potential impacts.
RC-5.5 Impacts to Air Quality. Ensure new development does not
disproportionately burden residents, due to age, culture, ethnicity, gender,
race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, with health effects from air
pollution. Prioritize resource allocation, investments, and decision making that
improves air quality for residents disproportionately burdened by air pollution
because of historical land use planning decisions and overarching institutional
and structural inequities.
EXHIBIT E
Page 86
xxvxxiv | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-6
CLIMATE CHANGE.
A resilient community that reduces its contributions to a changing climate and is
prepared for the health and safety risks of climate change.
RC-5.6 Community Benefit Plan. Require that any land use generating
or accommodating more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with
operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or where TRU unit
operations exceed 300 hours per week, provide a community benefit plan
demonstrating an offset to community impacts of the truck traffic.
RC-5.7 New Sensitive Receptors Near Existing Industrial Uses.
Avoid placing homes, schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities within 1,000
feet of a land use that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than
40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or where
TRU unit operations exceed 300 hours per week.
RC-5.8 New Localized Air Pollution Sources Near Existing Sensitive
Receptors. Avoid placing land uses that accommodate more than 100 trucks
per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units (TRUs)
per day, or where TRU unit operations exceed 300 hours per week within
1,000 feet of homes, schools, hospitals, and childcare facilities.
RC-5.9 Truck Hook-Ups at New Industrial or Commercial
Developments. Require new industrial or commercial developments at which
heavy-duty diesel trucks idle on-site to install electric truck hook-ups in docks,
bays, and parking areas.
RC-5.10 Clean and Green Industry. Prioritize non-polluting industries and
companies using zero or low air pollution technologies.
RC-5.11 Dust and Odor. Require new construction to include measures to
minimize dust and odor during construction and operation.
RC-6.1Climate Action Plan. Maintain and implement a Climate Action Plan
(CAP) that provides best management practices for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
RC-6.2 Renewable Energy. Encourage renewable energy installations and
facilitate green technology and business.
RC-6.3 Reduce Energy Consumption. Encourage a reduction in
community-wide energy consumption.
RC-6.4 Urban Forest. Protect the city’s healthy trees and plant new ones to
provide shade, carbon sequestration, and purify the air.
RC-6.5 GHG Reduction Goal. Reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990
levels by 2050 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045.
RC-6.6 Co-Benefits. Prioritize the development and implementation of GHG
reduction measures that also achieve economic, health, social, environmental,
and other co-benefits for the City and its residents and businesses.
RC-6.7 Structural Equity. Encourage GHG reduction and climate
adaptation measures such as trail completion, equipment upgrade, sidewalk
connectivity, tree planting, and buffers be included in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) to improve areas of the city where these features
are lacking.
RC-6.8 Reduce Vehicle Trips. Require Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies, such as employer provided transit pass/parking credit,
bicycle parking, bike lockers, high-speed communications infrastructure for
telecommuting, and carpooling incentives, for large office, commercial, and
industrial uses.
RC-6.9 Access. Require pedestrian, vehicle, and transit connectivity of streets,
trails, and sidewalks, as well as between complementary adjacent land uses.
RC-6.10 Green Building. Encourage the construction of buildings that are
certified Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) or equivalent,
emphasizing technologies that reduce GHG emissions.
RC-6.11 Climate-Appropriate Building Types. Encourage alternative
building types that are more sensitive to and designed for passive heating and
cooling within the arid environment found in Rancho Cucamonga.
RC-6.12 Reduced Water Supplies. When reviewing development
proposals, consider the possibility of constrained future water supplies and
require enhanced water conservation measures.
RC-6.13 Designing for Warming Temperatures. When reviewing
development proposals, encourage applicants and designers to consider
warming temperatures in the design of cooling systems.
RC-6.14 Designing for Changing Precipitation Patterns. When
reviewing development proposals, encourage applicants to consider stormwater
control strategies and systems for sensitivity to changes in precipitation regimes
and consider adjusting those strategies to accommodate future precipitation
regimes.
RC-6.15 Heat Island Reductions. Require heat island reduction strategies
in new developments such as light-colored paving, permeable paving, right-
sized parking requirements, vegetative cover and planting, substantial tree
canopy coverage, and south and west side tree planting.
EXHIBIT E
Page 87
xxviixxvi | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
RC-7
ENERGY.
An energy efficient community that relies primarily on renewable and non-
polluting energy sources.
RC-6.16 Public Realm Shading. Strive to improve shading in public
spaces, such as bus stops, sidewalks and public parks and plazas, through
the use of trees, shelters, awnings, gazebos, fabric shading and other creative
cooling strategies.
RC-6.17 Offsite GHG Mitigation. Allow the use of creative mitigation
efforts such as offsite mitigation and in lieu fee programs as mechanisms for
reducing project-specific GHG emissions.
RC-6.18 Water Sources with Low GHG Emissions. Encourage local
and regional water utilities to obtain water from sources with low or no GHG
emissions.
RC-7.1 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging on City Property. As funding
is available, encourage the installation of publicly available electric vehicle
charging stations at City-owned buildings, facilities, property, and in the public
right-of-way.
RC-7.2 New EV Charging. Require new multifamily residential, commercial,
office, and industrial development to include charging stations, or include the
wiring for them.
RC-7.3 EV Charging Retrofits. Encourage existing development to retrofit
to include charging stations.
RC-7.4 New Off-Road Equipment. When feasible, require that off-road
equipment such as forklifts and yard tugs necessary for the operations of all
new commercial and industrial developments be electric or fueled using clean
fuel sources.
RC-7.5 Municipal Vehicle Fleet. Reduce fossil fuel consumption of the
City’s vehicle fleet by increasing the number of electric or zero emissions
vehicles.
RC-7.6 Efficiency Retrofits. Encourage existing private property owners to
implement energy efficiency retrofits during substantial improvement as defined
by the California Building Code.
RC-7.7 Sustainable Design. Encourage sustainable building and site
design that meets the standards of Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED), Sustainable Sites, Living Building Challenge, or similar
certification.
RC-7.8 Farmers Market, Fork to Table. Support microscale agriculture
and farmers markets, and similar methods of encouraging locally grown and
consumed produce.
RC-7.9 Passive Solar Design. Require new buildings to incorporate
energy efficient building and site design strategies for the arid environment that
include appropriate solar orientation, thermal mass, use of natural daylight and
ventilation, and shading.
RC-7.10 Alternative Energy. Continue to promote the incorporation of
alternative energy generation (e.g., solar, wind, biomass) in public and private
development.
RC-7.11 Community Development Subdivisions. When reviewing
applications for new subdivisions, require residences be oriented along an east-
west access, minimizing western sun exposure, to maximize energy efficiency.
RC-7.12 Solar Access. Prohibit new development and renovations that
impair adjacent buildings’ solar access, unless it can be demonstrated that
the shading benefits substantially offset the impacts of solar energy generation
potential.
RC-7.13 Energy-Efficient Infrastructure. Whenever possible, use
energy-efficient models and technology when replacing or providing new city
infrastructure such as streetlights, traffic signals, water conveyance pumps, or
other public infrastructure.
RC-7.14 Energy Storage Facilities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
supports the development of energy storage facilities on property owned or
controlled by Southern California Edison and will cooperate with Southern
California Edison on the development of such facilities in a manner that
balances the interests of the community with the need for clean, reliable energy.
RC-7.15 Utility Preservation. Public and private development within the
City, including multi-purpose trails, shall not interfere with safe and reliable
transmission, storage, and generation of electricity. With the exception of utility
infrastructure and other public improvements that do not interfere with such
infrastructure, permanent structures are not allowed within utility corridors.
EXHIBIT E
Page 88
xxixxxviii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
GOAL
S-1
LEADERSHIP.
A city that is recognized for its leadership role in resilience and preparedness.
S-1.1 City Staff Readiness. Ensure City staff and departments demonstrate
a readiness to respond to emergency incidents and events.
S-1.2 Culture of Preparedness. Promote a culture of preparedness for
businesses and residents that empowers them to increase their resilience to
hazard related events and a changing climate.
S-1.3 Evacuation Capacity. Require new developments, redevelopments,
and major remodels to enhance the City’s evacuation network and facilities and
comply with the City’s Evacuation Assessment.
S-1.4 WUIFA Access Points. Require all new developments and
redevelopments within the WUIFA to provide a minimum of two points of access
by means of public roads that can be used for emergency vehicle response and
evacuation purposes.
S-1.5 Enhanced Circulation. In areas of the city with limited access routes
and circulation challenges, require additional roads and improvements to
ensure adequate emergency vehicle response and evacuation.
S-1.6 Evacuation Road Widths. Require any roads used for evacuation
purposes to provide at least 26 feet of unobstructed pavement width.
S-1.7 Maintenance of Plans. Maintain and regularly update the City’s
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) as an integrated component of the
General Plan, in coordination with the Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP), the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), the Evacuation Plan, and
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) compliant disaster plans
to maintain eligibility for grant funding.
S-1.8 Regional Coordination. Ensure regional coordination continues with
neighboring jurisdictions, County, State, and Federal agencies on emergency
management and risk reduction planning and activities.
S-1.9 Mutual Aid. Ensure mutual aid agreements with Federal, State, local
agencies, and the private sector establish responsibility boundaries, joint
response services, and multi-alarm and station coverage capabilities.
SAFETY GOAL
S-2
SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS.
A built environment that minimizes risks from seismic and geologic hazards.
S-2.1 Fault Setbacks. Require minimum setbacks for structures proposed
for human occupancy within State and City Special Study Zones. Setbacks
will be based on minimum standards established under State law and
recommendations of a Certified Engineering Geologist and/or Geo-technical
Engineer.
S-2.2 Building Functionality. Require enhanced siting, design, and
construction standards that focus on building functionality for new critical public
facilities and key essential (private) facilities after a seismic event.
S-2.3 Seismically Vulnerable Buildings. Prioritize the retrofit by private
property owners of seismically vulnerable buildings (including but not limited to
unreinforced masonry, soft-story construction, and non-ductile concrete) as better
information and understanding becomes available.
S-2.4 Transfer of Development Rights. Allow the transfer of development
rights from areas of significant seismic and geologic hazards to select
development areas throughout the City and Sphere of Influence.
S-2.5 Hillside Hazards. Prioritize regulations and strategies that reduce
geologic hazard risk to properties and loss of life.
GOAL
S-3
WILDFIRE HAZARDS.
A community where wildfire impacts are minimized or reduced through
investments in planning and resilience.
S-3.1 Fire Risk Reduction. Apply all state and local codes and regulations
(fire safe design, adherence to Standard 49-1) to new development,
redevelopment, and major remodels in the WUIFA.
S-3.2 Fire Protection Plans. All new development, redevelopment, and
major remodels in the WUIFA will require the preparation of Fire Protection
Plans (FPPs) to reduce fire threat, in accordance with Fire District policies and
procedures.
S-3.3 Vegetation Management. Owners of properties and public/
private roads within and adjacent to the WUIFA are required to conduct brush
clearance and fuel modification to reduce fire ignition potential and spread.
S-3.4 Buffer Zones. Require development projects to incorporate buffer
zones as deemed necessary by the City’s Fire Marshal for fire safety and fuel
modification.
EXHIBIT E
Page 89
xxxixxx | General Plan Annual Report 2023
S-3.5 Water Supply. All developments will meet fire flow requirements
identified in the Fire Code.
S-3.6 Coordination with Agencies. Coordinate with State, regional,
and local agencies and service providers on fire risk reduction planning and
activities.
S-3.7 Wildfire Awareness. Assist residents and property owners with being
better informed on fire hazards and risk reduction activities in the WUIFA.
S-3.8 New Essential Facilities (WUIFA). Prohibit the siting of new
essential public facilities (including, but not limited to, hospitals and health care
facilities, emergency shelters, emergency command centers, and emergency
communications facilities) within the WUIFA, unless appropriate construction
methods or strategies are incorporated to minimize impacts.
GOAL
S-4
FLOOD HAZARDS.
A community where developed areas are not impacted by flooding and
inundation hazards.
S-4.1 New Essential Facilities (Flood). Prohibit the siting and construction
of new essential public facilities within flood hazard zones, when feasible. If an
essential facility must be located within a flood hazard zone, incorporate flood
mitigation to the greatest extent practicable.
S-4.2 Flood Risk in New Development. Require all new development
to minimize flood risk with siting and design measures, such as grading that
prevents adverse drainage impacts to adjacent properties, on-site retention of
runoff, and minimization of structures located in floodplains.
S-4.3 500-Year Floodplain. Promote the compliance of 100-year
floodplain requirements on properties located within the 500-year floodplain
designation.
S-4.4 Flood Infrastructure. Require new development to implement and
enhance the Storm Drain Master Plan by constructing stormwater management
infrastructure downstream of the proposed site.
S-4.5 Property Enhancements. Require development within properties
located adjacent, or near flood zones and areas of frequent flooding to reduce
or minimize run-off and increase retention on-site.
S-4.6 Regional Coordination. Promote regional flood management and
mitigation projects with other agencies (San Bernardino County Flood Control,
Army Corps of Engineers, and adjacent jurisdictions) to address flood hazards
holistically.
S-4.7 Dam Operators. Coordinate with agencies operating or managing
dam facilities that can inundate the city, on operations, maintenance, and
training activities and provide the latest Emergency Action Plans annually.
GOAL
S-5
EMERGING HAZARDS.
A built environment that incorporates new data and understanding about
changing hazard conditions and climate stressors.
S-5.1 Future Conditions. Ensure future climatic conditions and public health
emergencies are considered as part of community resilience and investment
efforts.
S-5.2 Urban Forestry Plan. Minimize damage associated with wind-related
hazards and address climate change and urban heat island effects through the
development of an urban forestry plan and proper landscaping planting and
management techniques.
S-5.3 Soil Transport. Require that properties with high wind-blown soil
erosion potential such as agricultural operations and construction sites prevent
soil transport and dust generation wherever possible.
S-5.4 Extreme Heat Vulnerabilities. Require that new developments,
major remodels, and redevelopments address urban heat island issues and
reduce urban heat island effects for the proposed project site and adjacent
properties.
S-5.5 Resilience Resources. Require new developments and
redevelopments to incorporate resilience amenities such as, but not limited to
community cooling centers, emergency supplies, and backup power that can be
used by residents and businesses within a 1/4-mile radius of the location.
S-5.6 Underground Utilities. Promote the under-grounding of utilities for
new development, major remodels, and redevelopment.
S-5.7 Future Adaptation. Future climate adaptation-oriented projects will
incorporate natural infrastructure to the greatest extent practicable.
S-5.8 Climate Resiliency. Address climate resiliency and inequities through
the planning and development process.
S-5.9 Address High Winds. Require buildings and developments exposed
to high wind conditions to incorporate design elements and features that
minimize or reduce damage to people, structures, and the community.
EXHIBIT E
Page 90
xxxiiixxxii | General Plan Annual Report 2023
S-6.1 Planned Development. Promote development patterns that integrate
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles that reduce
the potential for human-caused hazards.
S-6.2 Neighboring Properties. Encourage properties that store, generate,
or dispose of hazardous materials to locate such operations as far away as
possible from areas of neighboring properties where people congregate.
S-6.3 Site Remediation. Encourage and facilitate the adequate and timely
cleanup of existing and future contaminated sites and the compatibility of future
land uses.
S-6.4 Airport Planning. Protect Rancho Cucamonga interests regarding
land use and safety by participating in the airport land use planning process for
Ontario International Airport.
S-6.5 Height Restrictions. Require proposed developments within the
Ontario Airport Influence Area meet the height requirements associated with
FAR Part 77 standards.
S-6.6 Development Near Airport. New development within the Ontario
Airport Influence Area shall be consistent with the approved Airspace Protection
Zones identified in the latest version of the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
S-6.7 Railroad Safety. Minimize potential safety issues and land use
conflicts when considering development adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.
GOAL
S-6
HUMAN CAUSED HAZARDS.
A community with minimal risk from airport hazards and hazardous materials.
N-1.1 Noise Levels. Require new development to meet the noise
compatibility standards.
N-1.2 Noise Barriers, Buffers and Sound Walls. Require the use of
integrated design-related noise reduction measures for both interior and exterior
areas prior to the use of noise barriers, buffers, or walls to reduce noise levels
generated by or affected by new development.
N-1.3 Non-Architectural Noise Attenuation. Non-architectural noise
attenuation measures such as sound walls, setbacks, barriers, and berms shall
be discouraged in pedestrian priority areas (or other urban areas or areas
where pedestrian access is important).
N-1.4 New Development Near Major Noise Sources. Require
development proposing to add people in areas where they may be exposed
to major noise sources (e.g., roadways, rail lines, aircraft, industrial or other
non-transportation noise sources) to conduct a project level noise analysis and
implement recommended noise reduction measures.
N-1.5 Urban and Suburban Development Near Transit. Allow
development located in infill areas, near transit hubs, or along major roadways
an exemption from exterior noise standards for secondary open space areas
(such as front yards, parking lots, stoops, porches, or balconies), if noise
standards can be met for primary open space.
N-1.6 Rail Crossing Quiet Zones. Allow the establishment of a full or
partial at-grade rail crossing or quiet zone near transit hubs or residential
development.
N-1.7 Entertainment. Establish different standards for exterior noise
consistent with the place type.
N-1.8 Vibration Impact Assessment. Require new development to reduce
vibration to 85 VdB or below within 200 feet of an existing structure.
GOAL
N-1
NOISE.
A city with appropriate noise and vibration levels that support a range of places
from quiet neighborhoods to active, exciting districts.
NOISE
EXHIBIT E
Page 91