Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDELETE (2) Design Review Committee Meeting Agenda June 17, 2025 FINAL MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 New Time: 6:00 p.m. A. Call to Order The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on June 17, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Jennifer Nakamura, Staff Coordinator, at 6:00 p.m. Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chairman Boling and Commissioner Daniels Staff Present: Kirt Coury, Contract Planner B. Public Communications Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Meeting Minutes of June 3, 2025. Item C1. Motion carried 2-0 vote as amended and posted online. D. Project Review Items D1. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, MASTER PLAN, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, TENTATIVE MAP, DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - To allow for the development and operation of five buildings totaling 1,775,098 square feet within approximately 3,513,101 gross square feet in lot size on certain property bounded by Arrow Route to the north, BNSF/Metrolink Railway to the south, Yellow Wood Road/Juneberry Drive and industrial land use to the east and west; APNs: 0229-121-35, 0229-131-19, 0229-121-33, 0229-121-34. Primary Case File No. DRC2021-00485. Staff presented the item to the Design Review Committee. The Committee liked the project design overall and asked for clarification on a few items. Committee member Daniels asked for clarification on the number of "new" streets proposed for the project. He expressed that he liked the design and the layout of the project, and that the architecture would be complimentary to the surrounding area. He asked about the proposed screen wall heights and locations. Committee member Boling asked for clarification on truck access, drive approaches, street dedications, and overall connections to adjacent public streets. He too expressed favor for the proposed architecture and like the street circulation, layout, and design of the overall project. The Design Review Committee voted to move the project forward to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. Recommended approval to PC. 2-0 Unanimous Vote. E. Adjournment Planning Director Nakamura adjourned the meeting at 6:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ___________________________ Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant