HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO 2025-071 - Kritzinger & RaoPSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 1
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
AGREEMENT FOR
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 18th day of June,
2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
(“City”) and Kritzinger & Rao, a California Corporation (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A.City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the
following design professional services: On-Call Urban Design Services (“the Project”).
B.Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services
described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.
C.City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner
set forth and more fully described herein.
D.Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws
of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a
good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the
mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1.Consultant’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and
design professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not
limited to consultant services for Urban Design Services, all as more fully set forth in the
Consultant’s proposal, dated April 3, 2025 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto
as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the
services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and
are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the
Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the
Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a
revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-071
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 2
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten
percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in
writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under
this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for
professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth
in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is
attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into
this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to
undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant
hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing
the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement,
Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant
(a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has
carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the
facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard
of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably
acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or
unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant
shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s
risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years
and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties’
signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not
be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been
fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year
increments for two (2) additional years, up to a total of 5 years, unless sooner terminated
as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City
Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and
Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant
shall not exceed $500,000 (per year), including all out of pocket expenses, unless
additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not withhold any
federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 3
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables
reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to
compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance
with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall
compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the
Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra
services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate
documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in
Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other
records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for
review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Jennifer Nakamura, or such other
person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be
Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the
progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that
must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any
approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.
5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement,
Srinivas Rao and Flavio Andres Chaves is hereby designated as the principal and
representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services
specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability
and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City
to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be
responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant
and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant
may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 4
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
6. Consultant’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under
Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including,
without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with
the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social
Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to
be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents
serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability,
damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s
violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City
shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this
Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to
promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files,
drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared,
created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any
and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same
(collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the
benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach
of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without
restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes,
sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under
this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its
representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no
circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings,
reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery,
notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment,
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 5
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of
this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project,
shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of
this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above,
the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its
subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory
copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to
the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights
whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.
City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but
not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding
and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents
that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any
instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists,
including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of
the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full
legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the
role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a
claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual
provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.
Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret
or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or
incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event
City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use
thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to
continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a
license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non-
infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times
remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to
incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of
City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or
employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes
on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold
City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against
City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 6
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant
and Consultant’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting,
statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants
that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not
be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant
such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to
City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section
shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to
information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the
Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide
information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably
necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.
10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained
any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant,
to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person
or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee,
commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of
this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right,
at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or
to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any
such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise,
in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to
the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if
such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable
laws as described in subsection 10.1.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 7
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
11. Indemnification.
11.1 Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, the Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated
volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 11.0), from and
against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of
action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature
whatsoever, including fees of accountants and other professionals, and all costs
associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of defense
(collectively “Claims”), whether actual, alleged or threatened, to the extent arising out of,
pertaining to, or relating to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful
misconduct of the Consultant, and/or its officers, agents, servants, employees,
subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity
or individual for which or whom the Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the
performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design
professional,” as the term is defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c). The
indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance
obligations contained in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required
by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is
charged to Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
11.2 Other Indemnities. With respect to claims and liabilities which do
not arise in connection with the performance of professional services by a “design
professional”, as that term is defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c),
including, but not limited to, those claims and liabilities normally covered by commercial
general and/or automobile liability insurance, and to the maximum extent permitted by
law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and
indemnify the Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses,
liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens,
stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants,
attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and the payment of
all consequential damages (collectively “Damages”), in law or equity, whether actual,
alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of
Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen,
suppliers, or contractors, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or
individual for which or whom Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of
this Agreement, except to the extent the Damages arise from the active or sole negligence
or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or
court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the
Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Damages with counsel
of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’
fees and experts’ costs as they are actually incurred in connection with such defense.
Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 8
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith. The indemnification obligation
herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this
Agreement.
. 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that
they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit
with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.
11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under
or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the
termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which
Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to
an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment
against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under
this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives,
employees and subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State
of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the
City, having an extended reporting period of not less than
three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall
provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the
Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 9
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent
insurable.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no
less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or
the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence
limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the
aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
(5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the
greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by
the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements
shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in
excess of the specified limits and coverage required which
are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City.
No representation is made that the minimum insurance
requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the
obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the
limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required
insurance policy and endorsements.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City,
its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability
arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of
Consultant; products and completed operations of
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 10
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its
officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
City officials which are not also limitations applicable to
the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be
excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except
after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has
been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for
non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty
(30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of
a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall
expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against
City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials.
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company
approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed
to do business in the State of California and which is rated
A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co.
Rating Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with
reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 11
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required
to be provided.
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting
and/or defending any claim against any insured, including
court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to
and shall not deplete any policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance,
endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any
request for proposals applicable to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance
coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s),
(2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability
declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements
shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf.
All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before
Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend
beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or
endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the
expiration of any required policies of insurance.
12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors
performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of
this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they
apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its
subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same
extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of
its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub-
subcontractor.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City
relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an
amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to
Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall
pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the
termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant
shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 12
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured
more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the
City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment
Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for
any Additional Services required because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of
delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s
regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other
addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the
provisions of this Section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Consultant: Srinivas Rao, Principal
Kritzinger & Rao
117 E. Colorado Blvd, Suite 600
Pasadena, CA 91105
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the
performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee,
subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer
any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s
obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein,
any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 13
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time
Consultant performs the Services. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California
Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the
payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public
works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an
applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage
Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply
with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations
can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm
Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft,
classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested
parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business
and at the Project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected
officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability
arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of
any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a
waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the
making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by
City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of
Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or
prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover
its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material
discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any
document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San
Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement
shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the
party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement
or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 14
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each
of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and
integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior
oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be
amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the
parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Consultant Name: Kritzinger & Rao
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
Approval ____ Buyer II, Purchasing
Alternate ____ Risk Management Coordinator
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6
5/28/2025 | 12:15 PM PDT
Project Manager
5/28/2025 | 11:59 AM PDT
Principal
Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
Mayor/President
7/17/2025 | 11:36 AM PDT
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 15
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
See attached Statement of Qualifications and Consultant’s Proposal.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 16
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Not Applicable.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 17
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Attachment A – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
(Sample Only – Not all forms will look identical to this Sample)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 18
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
FOR
ON-CALL URBAN DESIGN SERVICES – QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS LIST
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 26
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 5
1.2. SOQ DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ...................................................................................... 5
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS ........................................................................................................... 6
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ................................................................................................................................... 6
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS....................................................................................................... 6
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION......................... 7
1.7. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................ 7
1.8. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS .................................................................................................................... 7
1.9. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ................................................................................................ 8
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 8
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE ............................................................................................................................... 8
2.2. REPRESENTATIVES ............................................................................................................................... 8
2.3. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT ........................................................................................................................ 10
3. SOQ RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS....................................... 10
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 10
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 10
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 11
3.4. EXPERIENCE ....................................................................................................................................... 11
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ................................................................................................... 11
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES .......................................................................................................................... 11
3.7. SOQ RESPONSE .................................................................................................................................. 12
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H .................................................................................................................... 12
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST ...................................................................................... 12
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .............................................................................................. 12
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE ............................................................................................... 13
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................... 13
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION........................................................................................................... 13
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE .................................................................................................................... 13
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................... 13
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 26
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 14
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES................................................................................................................... 14
4.1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 14
4.2. REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 15
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................... 15
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ............................................................................................................................ 16
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 16
5.3. REFERENCE CHECKS .......................................................................................................................... 16
5.4. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS ....................................................................................................... 16
5.5. CONSULTANT SELECTION .................................................................................................................. 17
5.6. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .......................................................................................................... 17
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” .... 18
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” ......................................... 19
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” ................................................................................. 20
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ................................................................................... 21
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” ........................................................ 22
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ..................................................................................................... 23
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ............................................................................................... 24
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET .................................................................................................. 25
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 26
1. OVERVIEW
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is seeking Statement of Qualifications from experienced
Urban Design consulting firms to enter into an agreement for On-Call Urban Design Services. The City is inviting
qualified Consultants to submit a Statement of Qualifications (hereinafter “SOQ”) in accordance with the
minimum Scope of Services indicated herein.
The City intends to select qualified firms who will be placed on an official list of qualified consultants on an as
needed basis. Pricing is not being requested as a part of the SOQ submittal and should not be included in the
response. Consultants will be asked to submit pricing in accordance with the project scope of work at the time
the project is available.
Consultants wishing to participate in the SOQ solicitation must be registered as a Consultant on Planet Bids
through the City website at http://www.cityofrc.us/ https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement.
Only those responses received from registered Consultants will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by
the named Consultant that has downloaded the SOQ, this information is indicated in the bid system and
provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance with the named Consultants. Submitting a response
under a Consultant name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-
responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration.
Using PlanRC as a guide, the City requires that each new development project provide high quality architecture
and landscape architecture, and that it be well integrated into and connected to its surrounding context. This
approach is increasingly known as “Placemaking”, where the City’s well-established commitment to the design,
character and quality of each new building is balanced with ensuring that surrounding on-site and public open
spaces and streetscapes are safe, comfortable, beautiful, habitable spaces that promote people’s health,
happiness and well-being. Within and immediately adjacent to established residential neighborhoods,
appropriate contextual design typically means that new buildings, site improvements, and any related public
improvements must respect the existing scale and character of adjoining neighborhood environment and the
preferences and expectations of its residents.
New projects along the City’s major corridors and within commercial and industrial areas will be expected to
align with the goals established in PlanRC, development standards, and the City Council’s Vision and Values
Statement. This will often require developers to work closely with City staff to coordinate targeted
improvements to existing public streets and property frontages with an overall vision for the evolution of that
corridor or area, in some cases involving parallel City-initiated street and public realm improvements.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 26
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is a suburban community located in southwestern San
Bernardino County in Southern California. The City is bordered by the cities of Upland to the west, Ontario to
the south, and Fontana to the east. To the north is the San Gabriel Mountain range. The City’s early development
is characterized by agricultural activity that dominated the region during the late 1800’s/early 1900’s. The
cultivation of citrus and grapes were the principal agricultural activities in the area that would later become the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City originally developed as three distinct communities: Alta Loma, Cucamonga,
and Etiwanda. These communities were generally located in what would become the City’s northwest,
southwest, and northeast “quadrants”, respectively. With the goal of establishing a quality community, these
three communities joined together and incorporated as a city in 1977. With a population of over 175,000,
Rancho Cucamonga is committed to creating a world-class community.
The City has taken great pride in its commitment to high quality community planning and design. From the
adoption of its first General Plan in 1980 to its latest adoption of the General Plan in 2021, the City has grown
rapidly and has shifted policy focus from outward expansion to infill development. The General Plan, commonly
known as PlanRC, lays out a series of strategies to chart a path towards a 21st century world-class community
that is grounded in the foundational core values identified by the community. The vision of PlanRC is to create
a city for people—a city of great neighborhoods, natural open spaces and parks, thriving commercial and
industrial areas, and walkable and active centers and districts, all connected by safe and comfortable streets.
Through the implementation of PlanRC, the city will develop to be more welcoming and accessible to both
residents and visitors.
1.2. SOQ DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete SOQ responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified
in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be
responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post SOQ March 6, 2025
Questions Due March 24, 2025, by 9:00 am
Addendum Issued March 27, 2025
SOQ Response Due Date April 3, 2025, by 9:00 am
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 26
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Consultant.)
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Consultants finding discrepancies or omissions in the SOQ or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of
any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears
no responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this SOQ shall be considered a part of this
SOQ and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this SOQ.
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This SOQ should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Statement
of Qualifications in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a
Contract. However, SOQ responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation
of a contract based on the SOQ response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this SOQ form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify
your SOQ response submittal. Consultants must submit signed SOQ responses by the due date and time as
specified herein. Consultants will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted
as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this SOQ and
any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the
requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City
has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement
signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the
due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in
the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the
above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this SOQ until a Consultant is awarded, Consultants are not permitted to communicate
with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or
site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 26
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
All materials submitted in response to this SOQ solicitation will become the property of the City and will be
returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Consultant submitting the SOQ response. A copy
of the SOQ response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Consultant
considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public
Records Act may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or
otherwise.
1.7. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Consultant shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to
ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available in the SOQ
response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Consultant’s
sole risk.
Consultants shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their SOQ responses and
in this SOQ, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will
provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Consultants by way of addenda to Planet Bids;
however, it is the Consultant’s responsibility to ascertain that the SOQ response includes all addenda issued
prior to the SOQ due date.
1.8. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this SOQ does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the
City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
• Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, SOQ, or SOQ procedure.
• Reject any or all SOQs.
• Reissue a Request for SOQs.
• Prior to submission deadline for SOQs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures,
including deadlines for accepting responses, or requirements for any materials, equipment, or
services to be provided under this SOQ, or the requirements for contents or format of the SOQs.
• The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with
any or all responsive and responsible Consultants who submit SOQ responses.
• Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this SOQ by any other means.
• Determine that no project will be pursued.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 26
• The City reserves the right to inspect the Consultant’s place of business prior to award or at any time
during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Consultant’s capabilities and
qualifications.
1.9. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, Public records
are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right
to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall
be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted
by law.
Neither an SOQ in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this
SOQ are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or
omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty
to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public
Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis
for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information
is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for
the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public
disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal
basis to do so.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Consultant awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no
later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected
Consultant must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of
duties required under this SOQ and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request
throughout the term of the Contract.
2.2. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Consultant require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated
in this SOQ, the awarded Consultant will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its
right, title or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Consultant to so
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 26
assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no
effect.
The awarded Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel
engaged in performing the Services including Consultants subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the
awarded Consultant or under the awarded Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the
qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and
benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation,
unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is
aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured
against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of
that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
In case of default by the Consultant, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be
limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and
may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Consultant, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid
by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding
of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or
Consultants for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Consultant.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall
be__________________, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall
be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the
performance of the services, and the Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to City
Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the
approval of the City Representative.
Consultant Representative:
The response to this SOQ shall designate the representative of the Consultant authorized to act in its behalf
with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the
Consultant’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the
Consultant. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement
for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 26
hereunder. The successful Consultant may not change the Consultant’s Representative without the prior
written approval of City ’s Representative.
2.3. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Consultant personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being
conducted. While on City property, the Consultant’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under
no circumstances shall the Consultant’s or Consultant’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of
the City. Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees
of the City.
Consultant's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when
interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Consultant's personnel shall be required
to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Consultants and the public. Nothing
contained in this SOQ shall be construed as granting the Consultant the sole right to supply personal or
contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase
Order.
3. SOQ RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this SOQ form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and
evaluate SOQ responses fairly and completely Consultants must comply with the format and submission
requirements set out in this SOQ, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem said SOQ response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation
process.
If only one SOQ response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with
an SOQ review and negotiations.
SOQ responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be
submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper SOQ responses will be accepted. SOQ responses must include
the information required by this SOQ.
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
SOQ responses must include the complete name and address of Consultant and the name, mailing address, and
telephone number of the contact person regarding the SOQ response. A signature by an authorized
representative must be included on each SOQ response. Said signature will be considered confirmation of the
Consultants ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 26
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your SOQ response. This
section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by
sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the SOQ response will be separated
by a title page at the beginning of each section. SOQ responses shall be no longer than 20 pages in length
(including the Cover Letter, Table of Contents page, and all Title pages, but not including required exhibits).
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the Consultant’s SOQ response to provide
the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Consultant’s approach, SOQ response, experience,
and staffing.
3.4. EXPERIENCE
The Consultant shall provide a concise statement demonstrating the Consultant’s qualifications, experience,
expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this SOQ. Provide a brief history of your company,
including.
• The number of years in business,
• The firm’s service commitment to customers,
• If the firm is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its
proposed solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services.
• A statement as to whether your firm is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation,
or private nonprofit firm, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Consultant intends to subcontract, a detailed list of any sub-contractors, partners, or third-party
Consultants who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services including but not limited to:
• Description of the Consultant’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors,
• Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and
telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this SOQ,
• Describe the specific role of each.
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
Submit a one to two page resume of the proposed Project Lead staff who will be performing the services for the
City, maximum of three (3) resumes. Resumes shall be formatted in the following order:
• Position with the Company,
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 26
• Length of time with the Company,
• Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described
herein,
• Educational background,
• Role in the Project,
• Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein,
• Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
Consultant may also include a summary of Staff Biographies, a paragraph for each, summarizing other key staff
that may be available to perform the services of the City.
3.7. SOQ RESPONSE
Under this section Consultants shall provide a full, detailed response to the City ’s Scope of Services listed herein.
Consultants should be as thorough as possible in their response as it may be the only opportunity to convey
information regarding your business, ability, and qualifications to complete the services needed.
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet
Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G and Exhibit H. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem your SOQ submittal as non-responsive.
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed
“Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Consultant will be required to
enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City’s
bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Consultant and signed
by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This SOQ sets forth some of the general
provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this SOQ, Consultant will be
deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services
Agreement Exceptions Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13 of 26
PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this SOQ response submittal will result in
a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception
Summary must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G”.
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Consultants must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability
to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of
Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The
awarded Consultant will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the
Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded
Consultant, will not be accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Consultant shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Consultant’s
responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been
posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this SOQ shall be considered a part of this SOQ and shall become
part of any final Contract that may be derived from this SOQ. Consultants must indicate their acknowledgement
of any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted
under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Responding Consultants must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Consultant Certification Form” that they
are not listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance
with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189)
and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors
are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid
Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Consultants shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet
Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. This will indicate a Consultants agreement to or not to allow other entities
to utilize the SOQ response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Unsigned SOQ responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Consultant has
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14 of 26
carefully examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and
hereby proposes and agrees, if the Consultants SOQ response is accepted, Consultant agrees to furnish all
material in accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit
cost amounts set forth in the Consultants SOQ response.
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are
being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years.
“Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the
Response Types, Exhibit H.
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PURPOSE
The City is seeking Statement of Qualifications from experienced Urban Design consulting firms to enter into an
agreement for On-Call Urban Design Services. The City is inviting qualified Consultants to submit a Statement of
Qualifications (hereinafter “SOQ”) in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services indicated herein.
The City is interested in establishing a list of qualified firms to assist in the following tasks at the City’s request:
• Consultant services for urban planning, urban design, architecture and landscape architecture.
• Consultant services for urban design analysis, development, review, and recommendations.
• Training of staff on urban design, including but not limited to, introduction to urban design and
architecture, as directed by the City.
The City is requesting an SOQ from Urban Design Consulting firms with extensive demonstrated experience and
expertise in advising municipalities in urban design. The City intends to select qualified firms who will be placed
on an official list of qualified consultants that can be called upon on an as needed, project-by-project basis. The
selected firms will be maintained on the City’s official list for a three-year period, with an option to renew in
one-year increments for a total of five years.
Pricing is not being requested as a part of the SOQ submittal and should not be included in the response.
Consultants will be asked to submit pricing according to the project scope of work at the time the project is
available.
Consultants wishing to participate in the SOQ solicitation must be registered as a Consultant on the City
Consultant List. Consultant registration can be accomplished by visiting the City website at www.cityofrc.us.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15 of 26
4.2. REQUIREMENTS
Firms considered for this SOQ must demonstrate extensive experience in infill development at this range of
scale, spanning and integrating urban planning, urban design and architecture to deliver projects that relate to
and connect existing and/or future contexts. The scale and type of project assignments are expected to include:
a. Design review of development proposals for commercial, residential, mixed-use or industrial projects on
a single parcel.
b. Design review of master plans or specific plans in which new street networks within large parcels
organize new development of various types into residential neighborhoods, single-use districts, or
mixed-use neighborhoods or districts.
c. Deliverables will typically consist of memoranda summarizing analysis, findings and recommendations,
and may be supplemented by marking up submittal drawings and providing diagrams and other graphics
to illustrate design recommendations.
d. For selected projects, the consultant may be asked to work collaboratively with the City, the developer
and the developer’s design team to refine a project design or master plan to better meet the City’s goals
and objectives while also meeting the developer’s objectives.
e. Assignments may also include collaboration with City staff in planning and designing public
improvements, including but not limited to streetscape, complete street improvements, corridor
branding and wayfinding, and other public realm enhancements and improvements.
On-Call List Utilization
The purpose of on-call professional services in specific disciplines is to mobilize expertise on short notice under
pre-negotiated terms and conditions to address City needs as they occur.
The City has identified a need for professional expertise in the area of Urban Design to assist staff in developing
innovative solutions. When it is determined that the city will require services, the scope of work for the project
will be developed by City staff. The City will then solicit firms on the list to provide brief proposals and budgets
for the project. The City typically requests proposals from three firms for each project, but that could vary
depending on the type of project, number of firms on the list, or any known conflicts with the project. City staff
will review the submitted proposals and determine which on-call firm will perform the scope of services. The
City will also ask the firm(s) to verify that they do not have a financial interest or other potential conflict of
interest. Firms that have a potential conflict will not be asked to submit a proposal.
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16 of 26
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All SOQ responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those
SOQ responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the SOQ requirement as indicated herein will
proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
SOQ responses deemed as having met the standard SOQ requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated
by an Evaluation Committee. The SOQ submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10),
ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will
be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Demonstrated experience, skill, and ability to deliver urban design services at the
highest quality 25
Demonstrated knowledge and familiarity with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its
General Plan, Development Code, and vision for the future of the built environment 35
An understanding of the services requested and the work to be performed 10
Responsiveness, including demonstrated commitments to communication and client
service, as well as thoroughness, adequacy, and clarity of information provided 10
Demonstrated ability to accept “on-call” work and manage projects with short
deadlines 20
5.3. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks may be conducted by phone with the information being scribed
or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Consultant’s reference contact. Reference contacts will be
asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score from one (1) to ten (10), ten being
the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with the criteria scores. It is imperative
that Consultants provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact information for reference
checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Consultant ranking.
5.4. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17 of 26
Upon completion of the SOQ evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked
Consultants will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to
further expand on their SOQ response. Consultant interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a
ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the
evaluation criteria factors as stated within the SOQ.
5.5. CONSULTANT SELECTION
The final Consultant selection is based on which Consultant is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s
requirements, offering the best value.
The City may conduct negotiations with several Consultants simultaneously. The City may also negotiate
contract terms with the selected Consultants prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right,
unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any SOQ responses, or any part thereof, either separately or
to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of
the City.
5.6. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Consultant selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all
participating, responsive Consultants. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to
competing Consultants unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded
successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Consultant or withdraw the SOQ
entirely.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18 of 26
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT”
It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such
conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for
Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Consultants.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding SOQ responses received in response to
the Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502 for On-Call Urban Design Services –
Qualified Consultants List.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any
SOQ response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not
limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any SOQ
response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and
agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Consultants)
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19 of 26
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”
Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Consultants accepts the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Consultants proposes exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as
“Exception Summary”, which shall include the Consultants’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each
exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the
submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20 of 26
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________
(President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or
Representative)
of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the
(Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement
(PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502 for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List have been read and understood and that our
Consultants is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure to provide said
coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification
of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 26
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Consultants hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this SOQ have been received, if any.
Consultants understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the SOQ response to be
considered non-responsive. It is the Consultants’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and
download the number of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 26
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”
I certify that neither _____________________________ (Consultant) nor any of its proposed subcontractors
are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in
accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986
Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed
subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or
debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Consultants or any of its subcontractors
subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our SOQ will be disqualified.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 26
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may
utilize this SOQ response at their option for equipment or services at the SOQ response price for a period of
________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner
or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of
such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of
its own order placement and payments of the Consultants.
Successful Consultants will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please
specify.
YES __________ NO _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 26
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the Scope of Work and read the above terms and
conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this SOQ response is accepted, to furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following SOQ response.
THE CONSULTANT IN SUBMITTING THIS SOQ RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.
FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR SOQ RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name:
Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address:
Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print)
Title:
Signature:
Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibits A – G must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 26
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-502
for
On-Call Urban Design Services – Qualified Consultants List
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26 of 26
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your SOQ response. Exhibit H must be submitted in Planet Bids system
under the Response Types, Exhibit H.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
City Of Rancho Cucamonga
ON-CALL URBAN DESIGN SERVICES
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SOQ # 24/25-502
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
April 3, 2025
www.kritzinger-rao.com
117 East Colorado Blvd. Suite 600,
Pasadena, CA
info@krdesigninc.com
Prime Contact Person:
Andres Chaves
Project Manager
contracts@krdesigninc.com
MTA CERTIFIED SBE/DBE
KRITZINGER & RAO
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
April 3, 2025
Cheryl Combs
City of Rancho Cucamonga – Procurement Department
10500 Civic Center
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730
Subject: ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES, SOQ #24/25-502
Dear Cheryl,
We, Kritzinger & Rao, are a LA Metro certifi ed MBE/DBE small business fi rm that was established in 2004. We
take great pride in our track record of client satisfaction, which derives from the quality of our work, and the
personalized, hands-on attention by both principals and all staff at every stage of the design process. The thread
that binds together our body of work is the rigor we bring to every project, our hands-on personal involvement in
all aspects of our work, and our commitment to creating world-class buildings and places.
Our strength lies in the broad spectrum of expertise that our company and its principals bring to the table. We
provide knowledge-based planning and design services in the institutional, commercial, housing, education, and
recreation sectors. From providing urban planning services at the regional scale to designing the interiors of
individual buildings for greater effi ciency and improved working environments, no project is too small, or too big.
We would like to emphasize these broad range of experience that we bring along with specifi c skills required to
complete this job – experience that will help mobilize and engage the stakeholder group, meet their requirements,
and create a facility that is innovative in design, technically sound, fl exible, cost effective, sustainable, and world
class in its execution.
Kritzinger & Rao’s Design Convergence process begins with a unifi ed approach to context, culture, architecture,
structural systems, and energy performance. Every project we design begins with site planning that derives from
geographic and climatic data, and we do our own energy modeling beginning with concept design. Our design
philosophy embodies a holistic approach to sustainability. We think of ourselves as a creative design laboratory that
places the correct emphasis on both cornerstones of good design - creative thinking and technical excellence.
We understand that in order to provide the City with suffi cient information to evaluate our ability to meet its needs
and expectations, we are submitting our professional biographies, and the project experience meeting the criteria
outlined in the SOQ.
We certifi ed we have read the City’s Request for Qualifi cations (SOQ) and fully understand its intent, acknowledge
and accept all terms and conditions. We acknowledge we have received all the addendums and notifi cations
regarding this SOQ.
We are highly motivated and hope to have the opportunity to work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Andres Chaves
Associate & Project Manager
O: 626.219.1785
M: 909.809.0827
COVER LETTER
KRITZINGER & RAO
1C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
2
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
1.1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. EXPERIENCE 6
2.1. FIRM PROFILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.1. History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.2. Public Agency Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.3. Financial Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.4. Confl ict of Interest, Litigations and Legal Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2. PROJECT EXPERIENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.1. Aerocity Master Plan & Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.2. KAU Health Sciences District Plan & Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.3. Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park & Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3. PRINCIPALS’ EXPERIENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3.1. Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan & Design Guidelines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3.2. Boeing Douglas Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. KEY PERSONNEL 12
3.1. TEAM OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.1. Prime Consultant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.2. Subconsultants Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4. SOQ RESPONSE 19
4.1. UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2. FAMILIARITY WITH CITY’S VISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
TABLE OF CONTENT
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
4
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga stands as a model of suburban evolution, blending its rich history with
a forward-thinking vision for the future. Kritzinger & Rao is well prepared to partner with the city in fulfi lling this vision by
bringing world-class expertise to offer development and planning review, collaborative efforts with developers, and working
closely as a team with the city staff.
Our brief qualifi cations package demonstrates our experience and expertise. Some of the key features of our team are:
• Multidisciplinary knowledge base that includes best practices in urban design, development economics,
sustainability, infrastructure, and building typologies.
• Extensive experience in urban design & master planning as a fi rm
• Professional qualifi cations as Certifi ed Planners & Architects
• Expertise and experience of the Principals in award winning & prestigious projects
• Experience of a serving Design Commissioner of a major City
• Highly qualifi ed sub-consultant team
• Domestic & International experience
• The fi rms core philosophy and mission to build great healthy communities that are sustainable through
knowledge-design, creativity, inclusivity and collaboration
We are excited that the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan and Development Code refl ect a dynamic vision for the
future of its built environment—one that balances growth with sustainability, connectivity, and cultural vitality. K+R believes
that by reimagining its suburban framework into a network of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, the city aims to transcend
its sprawling roots and emerge as a 21st-century world class community. Through this thoughtful approach, the city not only
enhances the quality of life for its residents but also sets a precedent for suburban transformation in the inland Empire and
beyond. Kritzinger & Rao would love to collaborate with the city on this journey.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
SECTION 2 - EXPERIENCE
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
6
2. EXPERIENCE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
2.1. FIRM PROFILE
2.1.1. History
Starting as Kritzinger Consultancy in 1987, Neil Kritzinger has designed projects in the United States, Asia, Africa & the Middle
East in collaboration with fi rms such as DMJM, Welton-Becket, Parsons, ARUP, and Johnson Fain where he met Srinivas Rao, at
that time a Senior Associate with the fi rm. After collaborating on several projects, we established Kritzinger & Rao and located
in downtown Los Angeles in 2004. We are a LA Metro certifi ed MBE/DBE small business, incorporated as a C Corporation on
January 28 in 2004.
We share a compelling interest in the quality of our surroundings and in the aspirations of all scales of human settlement, large
and small, from cities to buildings, and from green-fi elds to brown-fi elds. We provide creative design services in architecture,
planning, urban design, and architectural services to fulfi ll this mission. We as a multidisciplinary fi rm provides knowledge based
design that relies on research and creativity to deliver design solutions that will help make our communities better. We take great
pride in our track record of client satisfaction, which derives from the quality of our work, and the personalized, hands-on
attention by both principals and all staff at every stage of the design process.
Our diverse international portfolio refl ects that in recent years we have competed successfully with US and international fi rms
in many countries, where we now enjoy a reputation for our ability to understand and provide creative insights into local
cultural mores; for our ability to conceptualize and manage complex transformations; and for our ability to provide innovative
design that exemplifi es technical excellence and international best practices.
Some of our key relevant qualifi cations are:
• 21 years of experience delivering architectural services
• Expertise in scope development (programming), planning and architecture
• Planned, designed, and delivered a wide range of public, institutional, and corporate facilities all over the world.
• The two Principals have over 70 years of cumulative experience working on new, retrofi t, and adaptive reuse projects.
• Experienced in multidisciplinary coordination, scheduling, permitting and construction administration
• Kritzinger & Rao performs energy modelling as part of the design process. Expertise in LEED and CalGReen with in-
house Building Energy Compliance Simulation (Title 24).
• Over 100 projects completed and never missed a deadline.
2.1.2. Public Agencies Experience
K+R is currently working with several public agencies including the County of Los Angeles, Department of Parks & Recreation,
Los Angeles Metro and the City of Pasadena. We have worked with overseas public agencies such as the Delhi International
Airport, Municpal Governments of the Cities of Beijing & Shanghai, King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah and others. We are
also currently contracted with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Beaches and Harbors to provide ongoing planning
and design services. Our team members have also worked with various agencies within the Los Angeles metropolitan area,
Orange County and other public agencies of Southern California.
We have also worked in many cities around the world, and are knowledgeable about best practices and innovative ideas, both
here and abroad, that are shaping how best practices can contribute positively to the way we live. For example, open spaces
enrich the quality of life for residents of all ages, promote health and well-being, and provide opportunities for both active
and passive recreation; and additionally and most vitally, their health and wellbeing is critical to ensuring ecological vitality,
protection of fl ora and fauna, and protection of watersheds.
2.1.3. Financial Condition
As a certifi ed SBE/DBE, we are currently contracted with the County of Las Angeles, Department of Parks & Recreation, the
Department of Beaches & Harbors, and Los Angeles Metro to provide planning and design services. During Covid pandemic
was a challenge that we were all enduring and our continued involvement with public agencies allows us to maintain fi nancial
stability, retain our employees, and continue to make a difference in the communities we serve.
2.1.4. Confl ict of Interest, Litigations and Legal Actions
We certify that we don’t have any pending litigation, regarding the performance of any services similar to the services, in which
the Company has been involved in the past that may affect our ability to provide our services.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
2.2. EXPERIENCE - RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
2.2.1. Aerocity Master Plan & Design Guidelines
New Delhi, India
Planning themes & objectives:
Urban Design & Place Making
Form Based Design Guidelines & Performance Standards
Plan Review & Approvals
Community Outreach
Program Development to Program Validation
Master Planning Services
Cost & Revenue Assessment
Regulatory and Jurisdictional Requirements
Habitat/Environmental Assessment
Access/Connectivity
Concept Plan and Design
The Aerocity plan, and design of the public realm of this
Transit Oriented Development (TOD), is supported by
urban design guidelines to ensure a living environment
where architecture and landscape work together to
support community well-being. The 230-acre greenfi eld
site will be served by multiple regional and local transit
lines that ensure that no part of the vibrant new urban
center is more than a 10-minute walk from a station.
Currently under construction, all streets are designed as
Complete Streets that promote walkability and ensure
effi cient multi-modal connectivity. The plan is structured
by a “Main Street” that acts as the central spine of the
open space framework around which numerous precincts
are organized and anchored by neighborhood parks. The
parks provide a social focus, and have a distinct character
infl uenced by the dominant use of each precinct - Tourism,
Innovation, Health, Sports, Culture, etc.
Main Street also acts as a platform for sustainable
practices that ensure resource conservation. For
example, bioswales and rain gardens throughout the
streetscape minimize run-off and improve groundwater
replenishment. Numerous interpretive “Art Walks” enrich
the pedestrian experience through culturally infl uenced
themes and storytelling.
The plan seeks to implement its fair share of the
commitments made as part of the UNFCCC Paris
Agreement to combat climate change and to accelerate
and intensify the actions and investments needed for a
sustainable low carbon future.
The Plan:
• Reduces reliance on cars by creating a safe & walkable
transit community
• Reduces carbon by aggressive energy standards for
buildings
• Sequesters carbon by prescribing minimum tree
canopy density
• Conserves water through rain water harvesting and
minimizes run-off through bio-infi ltration
• Proposes a comprehensive waste management system to conserve resources.
Complete Streets at Aerocity
7
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
2.2. EXPERIENCE - RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
The mission of this master plan - for which K+R lead a team
of international consultants - was to fund the university
endowment by making strategic use of valuable vacant land
on the KAU campus, and to create a spatial and organizational
structure that would enable potential donors to fund and
develop individual buildings.
After a high-level review of national economic and social
growth trends, and after concept master planning of the two
public-facing sides of the campus, a strategic decision was
made to begin future development by establishing a Health
Sciences District in response to enormous growth in that
sector. The decision also capitalized on the university’s focus
on the sciences, and on the presence of a large and adjacent
teaching hospital.
Due to its unique funding mechanism, future growth
of the HSD was assured to be incremental, and the
functional focus of each individual (donor) increment
potentially unpredictable unless guided by an over-arching
program. K+R therefore directed a pioneering long-range
programming effort designed to integrate health care into
a community setting. The outcome was 1.2 million square
feet of mixed use development that includes a 650-bed
hospital, medical offi ces, clinics, labs, housing for nurses and
extended-stay, retail, hotel, and a wellness center.
Architectural prototypes for alternative uses - labs, offi ces,
research, housing, etc - were developed for the individual
blocks which could all be individually parked, and form
based design guidelines and a comprehensive landscape plan
were developed to ensure the unifi ed outcome desired by
the client.
2.2.2. KAU Health Sciences District Plan & Design Guidelines
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
675((7:$//0,1,080/(1*7+
A = Building base
B = Building podium
A+B = Minimum length 85% of block length for building base
C+D = Minimum length 70% of block length for building base
( 0LQLPXPGHSWKRIP
675((7:$//$5($6 675((7:$//9$5,$7,21
2Q EORFNV IURQWLQJ WKH
park at the intersection of
% VWUHHW DQG )LUVW VWUHHW
VWUHHWZDOOLVUHTXLUHG
A = 3m streetwall variation
5(48,5('67(3%$&.6
$ PPLQLPXPUHTXLUHGVWHSEDFN
% PPLQLPXPSRGLXPEDVH
675((7:$//0,1,080$1'0$;,080+(,*+7
$ PPD[LPXPKHLJKWRIVWUHHWZDOO
B = 5m minimum height of streetwall
Planning themes & objectives:
People First
Access to Jobs
Walkability & Safety
Health & Wellness
Sustainability & Climate Change
Transit Oriented Development
Mixed Use
Form Based Design Guidelines
Incremental Development & Phasing
Market Feasibility
Cost & Funding Strategy
Cultural Compatibility
8
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
2.2. EXPERIENCE - RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
This competition-winning plan for Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park is
located in Pudong, Shanghai, and is home to companies such
as SMIC, NEC,Grace semiconductor, Hewlett-Packard, Intel,
IBM, Lenovo, Novartis and Pfi zer. It occupies 466 hectares
and comprises 3.7 million square meters of development in
four sub-areas - R&D, China Central Science Institute, Arts
Colleges, and Technology Island. An amenity core along the
river links the four districts.
The urban design structure is established by creating
centers of distinctly different character for the four districts,
and by the intersection of these centers with the riverside
amenity core which provides retail, entertainment, cultural,
and mixed use facilities to support the 24/7 lifestyle of
Shanghai’s Hi-Tech center. The district centers also intersect
with the main east west spine where modal split nodes
are located to support Transit Oriented Development and
anchor a secondary network of shuttles and pedestrian,
bike and jogging pathways that will enable a largely car-free
environment.
Green Technologies are integrated throughout the Plan
in a systematic manner. The Sustainable Water Strategy
supplements municipal water used for potable use with
rainwater harvesting that captures all stormwater runoff
from paved surfaces and roofs. Permeable paving systems are
used to capture pollutants and heavy metals and act as cost-
effective storm-water management system that eliminates
erosion and allows seepage to recharge groundwater,
restore subsurface fl ow paths. Runoff is collected, treated,
stored and redistributed for non-potable domestic uses,
after which greywater is recycled for treatment and
blackwater is treated for re-use in landscaping and irrigation.
At the same time landscaped areas employ a system of
bioswales, infi ltration ponds, and constructed wetlands to
recharge groundwater and return clean water to the rivers
and streams.
The palette of indigenous plants selected for the landscaped
areas provides climatically appropriate vegetation that also
supports and maintains natural fauna.
2.2.3. Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park & Design Guidelines
Shanghai, China
Planning themes & objectives:
Urban Design & Place Making
Form Based Design Guidelines & Performance Standards
Plan Review & Approvals
Community Outreach
Program Development to Program Validation
Master Planning Services
Cost & Revenue Assessment
Regulatory and Jurisdictional Requirements
Habitat/Environmental Assessment
Access/Connectivity
Concept Plan and Design
9
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
Winner of the 2004 AIA Honor Award for excellence in
Regional and Urban Design, the Plan for the 300-acre urban
mixed-use neighborhood integrates and enhances the City’s
street framework and open space system. Plan builds upon
the assets of previous plans and incorporates a strong
historic component. It incorporates University of California
at San Francisco’s new Campus (on 43 acres and totaling
2.65 million sq. ft. of development), R&D Biotech Offi ces
(2.5 million sq. ft. development), High Density Housing
(3000 dwelling units), Retail (250,000 sq. ft.) and a Hotel
(400 rooms).
Located fi ve miles north of downtown Long Beach, the
Douglas Park project comprises approximately 261 acres
of former and existing Boeing aircraft production facilities.
The newly master planned community has 3.3 million square
feet of commercial and offi ce space, 200k square feet of
retail space, 1,400 residential units, and 11 acres of public
parks
2.3.1. Mission Bay Redeveloment Plan &Design Guidelines
San Francisco, CA
2.3.2. BOEING DOUGLAS PARK
Long Beach, CA
Above Projects Design Firm: Johnson Fain
10C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
2.3. EXPERIENCE - PRINCIPALS’ EXPERIENCE
KRITZINGER & RAO
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
SECTION 3 - KEY PERSONNEL
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
12
3. KEY PERSONNEL
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
3.1. TEAM OVERVIEW
K+R works worldwide on a large variety of projects, almost all unique and seldom repeated elsewhere. We therefore routinely
assemble teams based on the specifi c needs of the project and client, and on which skill sets and personnel represent the
greatest likelihood of creating a successful product. Our success in doing so is built upon the rigorous processes we employ
in working together as one team. For this SOQ, we have assembled a team whose members we know, or have worked with
in the past in another context, and that are, crucially, already very familiar with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its social
characteristics, and its administrative procedures.
3.1.1. Prime Consultant
1. Planners, Urban Designers & Architects - Kritzinger & Rao
Kritzinger & Rao will be responsible for the project coordination, design, and development during all project phases, project
management and timely delivery, engineering coordination and keep effective communication with the City to meet time cost
and quality goals.
Srinivas M. Rao
Principal, Planner & Architect
• Email: srao@krdesigninc.com
Neil Kritzinger
Principal & Urban Designer
• Email: nkritzinger@krdesigninc.com
Andres Chaves
Associate & Urban Designer
• Email: achaves@krdesigninc.com
3.1.2. Subconsultants Team
2. Landscape Architects & Planners - Rha Landscape Architects & Planners Inc.
Doug Grove, RLA, ASLA, LEED AP, President
• Email: dougg@rhala.com
In charge of landscaped design plans and prepare the preliminary landscape design plan illustrating walkways, site furnishings,
trees and landscape areas, proposed plant material and landscape materials, detailed information, products, and fi nishes.
Greg Meek, RLA, Principal
• Email: gregm@rhala.com
3. Landscape Architecture - Pamela Studio Inc.
Pamela Brief, President
• Email:pamela@pamelastudios.com
Zara Jane L. Gomez, Senior Designer
• Email:Roberto@pamelastudios.com
Responsibilities range from site assessments analysis, preliminary design and design development, through preparation of
construction documents.
Client References:
• City of Pico Rivera, DPR
-Pam Yugar, Director
-pyugar@pico-rivera.org
-(562) 801-4426
-6767 Passons Boulevard
-Pico Rivera CA 90660
• City of Riverside, DPR
-Ms. Pamela Galera, Director
-pgalera@riversideca.gov
-(951) 826-2055
-6927 Magnolia Avenue
-Riverside, California 92506
• City of Placentia, Community Services
-Lydie Gutfeld, Director
-lgutfeld@placentia.org
-(714) 993-8227
-401 E. Chapman Ave
-Placentia, CA 92870
Client References:
• City of Claremont
-Foothill Boulevard Master Plan
-Vincent Ramos
-909-399-5465
-vramos@ci.claremont.ca.us
-Claremont, CA
• City of Irvine
-OC Great Park Sports Complex
-Director of Community Development
-greatpark@cityofi rvine.org
-949-724-6247
-City of Irvine, CA
• City of Los Angeles
-Recreation & Conservation Authority
-Confl uence Park
-Gabriella Golik
-gabriella@gglandscapearch.com
-City of Los Angeles, CA
1. Economics - Kosmont
Responsibilities include: real estate and fi nancial advisory, economic development strategies, public/private project transactions,
sustainable infrastructure, housing projects, market studies and economic analysis for the public, non-profi t and private sectors.
Thomas Jirovsky, Project Manager
• Email: tjirovsky@kosmont.com
Ken K. Hira, President/Princial Advisor• Email: khira@kosmont.com
Client References:
• City of Eastvale
-Gus Gonzalez, Community Director
-ggonzalez@eastvaleca.gov
-(951) 703-4425
-12363 Limonite Ave., Suite910
-Eastvale, CA 91752
• City of Chino
-Jackie Melendez, Assistant City Manager
- jmelendez@cityofchino.org
-(909) 268-2967
-13220 Central Avenue
-Chino, CA 91710
• City of St. Helena
-Anil Comelo, City Manager
-acomelo@cityofsthelena.org
-(707) 312-0262
-1480 Main Street
-St. Helena, CA 94574
Fernando Sanchez, Vice President
• Email: fsanchez@kosmont.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
13
3. KEY PERSONNEL
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
5. Strategic Communications - MBI Media
Matthew Maldonado
Senior Project Manager
• Email:mmaldonado@mbimedia.com
Services include understanding multicultural diverse communities, key concerns, and effective solutions, Innovative and
traditional, approaches to complex problems, Establishing long-term, collaborative partnerships with key stakeholders and
elected offi cials, Maximizing public participation, Media relations specialists, Public meeting facilitation.
Noemi Luna
Diversity Outreach Support
• Email:nluna@mbimedia.com
Client References:
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes
-Housing Element Update
-Matt Kowta, Managing Principal
-mkowta@bae1.com
-(530) 750-2195
-803 2nd Street | Suite A
-Davis, CA 95616
• City of Long Beach
-2040 General Plan
-Christopher Koontz, Planning Offi cer
-christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov
-(562) 570-6288
-333 West Ocean Blvd., 5th Floor
-Long Beach, CA 90802
• City of Irvine
-Neighborhood Revitalization Program
-Kelly Bullock, Health and Wellness Offi cer
-kbullock@cityofi rvine.org
-(949) 724-6430
-Irvine, CA
Kristyn Bogda
Deputy Project Manager
• Email: kbogda@mbimedia.com
6. Cost Estimater - Iskander Associates Inc.
Iskander Abdulla
President | Cost Estimator
• Email: iskander@iskanderinc.com
Oversee all preconstruction services, including cost estimating, scheduling, and budgeting efforts by IAI staff. Prepare regular
cost reports and cost analyses for the renovation project. Regularly meet with the design team to review the cost impacts of
design decisions and provide value engineering throughout the design process as needed.
Client References:
• IMEG Corp
-Stone Creek Park
-Park to Playa Trail Blair Hills
-Naseer Ahmed
-Executive Principal
-626-463-2800
-Nasser.Ahmed@imegcorp.com
• Cedar Sinai Medical Center
-Plaza Level Healing Garden
-Patrick Barton, MBA
-Finance Director
-Patrick.barton@cshs.org
-323-866-7874
-Los Angeles, CA
• Raw International Inc.
-MacLaren Community Park Master Plan
-Steve G. Lot
-slott@rawinternational.com
-213.622.4993 x 102
-4024 Durfee Avenue
-El Monte, CA 91732
7. MEP, FLS and LV - Budlong & Associates
Sunil Patel, P.E, LEED AP
Principal In Charge
• Email: sunil@budlong.com
Budlong’s role iencompasses providing comprehensive Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire and Life Safety, Low Voltage, and
Audio-Visual design services. Responsibilities include designing effi cient and sustainable systems tailored to the facility’s needs,
ensuring compliance with California Title 24 and other regulatory standards.
Kelly Schall
MEP Project Manager
• Email: kelly@budlong.com
Client References:
• Paul Murdoch Architects
-Milena Murdoch, Vice Presidents
-paulmurdocharchitects.com
-310.358.0993 ext. 2
-Los Angeles, CA
• LCDG
-Veronica Romero West, AIA
-Project Manager
-626 351-4301 x107/ 626 437-1014
-Pasadena, CA
• HDR
-Patrick Kim, Facility Design Manager
-patrick.kim@hdrinc.com
-D 213-312-9405 M 213-509-5935
-350 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2900
-Los Angeles, CA 90071
4. Signage & Wayfi nding - RSM Design
Cody Clark, LEED GA
Principal in Charge
• Email: cody@rsmdesign.com
The RSM Design studio is a multi-disciplinary design collaborative working at the intersection of architecture and graphic
design. Our projects connect people.
Eloisa Ortiz,
Senior Associate/Project Director
• Email:eloisa@rsmdesign.com
Client References:
• City of Dana Point
-Kelly Reenders
-Economic Development Manager
-kreenders@danapoint.org
-949.248.3519
-Dana Point, CA
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
-Linda Daniels
-Assistant City Manager
-909.477.2700
-Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• City of San Clemente
-Jim Pechous
-City Planner
-pechousj@san-clemente.org
-949.366.4750
-San Clemente, CA
Chris SetchellSenior Designer / Lead Designer• Email: chris.s@rsmdesign.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
14
3. KEY PERSONNEL
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
11. Spec Writer - Construction Specifi cation Services
Young Johnson
Principal
• Email: yoj@pacbell.net
Drawing on many years of construction experience and with hands-on fi eld work, our specwriter is able to help facilitate
accurate bidding and procurement, best practices in project administration, and readiness for occupancy. Since specs use industry standards, prospective contractors are able to understand the project requirements and restrictions in plain English;
thus, make realistic estimates of contract costs.
10. Survey and Topography - Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Greg Sebourn, PLS
Senior Project Manager
• Email: Greg.Sebourn@stantec.com
Responsibilities includes business development; project management; client management; and surveying, mapping, and map
checking services.
12. CASp Specialist - SCS Inc.
Scott Saddlemire
President
• Email: scottsaddlemire@gmail.com
Role: During design phase, the CASp will work closely with the design professionals to ensure all applicable standards are met ongoing review of plans before submitting to the AHJ with the goal of limited comments from access review. Mr Saddlemire
has the added benefi t of also being a Division of State Architect inspector.
9. Civil & Structural Engineers - C.W. Howe Partners Inc.
Responsibilities shall include civil and structural design, analysis and preparation of construction documents including General
Notes and Material Specifications, Plans and Details in conformance with the 2021 IBC, 2022 CBC and local codes and
standards.
Katherine Baad, P.E
Principal
• Email: katie@cwhowe.com
Carl How, P. E
Founding Principal
• Email: carl@cwhowe.com
8. Traffi c - Raju Associates Inc.
Oversee transportation planning including travel demand model development and application, micro simulation, access
planning and design, circulation system planning, goods movement and impact evaluations, development of improvement
plans and documentation requirements.
Client References:
• City of Inglewood
-City of Inglewood Mobility Element
-Louis Atwell
-latwell@cityofi nglewood.org
-310-412-5301
• Los Angeles World Airports
-Landside Access Modernization Program
-Stephen Culberson
-Ricondo & Associates, Inc.
-sculberson@ricondo.com
-312-479-8710
• LADOT
-The Village Transportation Plan
-Tom Carranza
-PTomas.carranza@lacity.org
-213-972-8476
-Playa Vista, CA
Srinath Raju, President | Cost Estimator
• Email: iskander@iskanderinc.com
Chris Muñoz, Senior Associate
• Email: chris.munoz@rajuassociates.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
15
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
RE
S
U
M
E
S
3.1. KEY PERSONNEL - STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
NEIL KRITZINGER
PRINCIPAL & URBAN DESIGNER
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES & AFFILIATIONS:
• American Planning Association
• Urban Land Institute
• Merit Award, Progressive Architecture, Main St., UC Irvine, 1987
• Excellence in Planning ULI, Center City West Specifi c Plan, 1990
• Merit Award, Progressive Architecture, LA Greenways, 1992
• First prize, International competition to redesign City of Riyadh,
KSA,1995
EDUCATION:
• Bachelor of Architecture (summa cum laude), University of Cape
Town, RSA, 1972
• M.A. in Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California
Los Angeles, 1981
Mr. Kritzinger has 40 years of experience in regional and master planning,
urban design, and architecture. He has undertaken projects in the United
States, Pacifi c Islands, China, Korea, the Middle East, South America, Europe,
and Africa, in both the private and public sectors.
After beginning his career as an award-winning architect, the experience of
working on notable large-scale projects under the guidance of luminaries
such as David Crane, Ed Bacon, Oscar Niemeyer, and Aldo Giurgola, steered
Mr. Kritzinger towards a broader consideration of the built environment,
and he began to build his career around thinking and designing at all scales.
His early work in Los Angeles included facility plans for aerospace
companies (Aerospace Company, TRW, McDonnell Douglas) and movie
studios (Paramount, NBC, and Warner Brothers); the 1984 Olympics; early
plans for Playa Vista; restoration of the Santa Monica Pier; and the Center
City West Specifi c Plan. He was also a member of the award-winning UC
Irvine ‘Main Street’ and LA Greenways design teams. During the midnineties
he was lead urban designer for the Dubai 2014 Structure Plan, and won
the 1995 international competition to re-design Riyadh. Upon his return,
he worked on biotech, transportation, education, and housing projects,
including plans and buildings for Amgen in Thousand Oaks and Colorado;
Union Station and LAX; the College of Engineering and CITRIS
Nanotechnology Building at UC Berkeley; and the Met Lofts building near
LA Live.
In 2004, Mr. Kritzinger formed K+R with his colleague Srinivas Rao. The
fi rm views architecture, urban design, and planning as complimentary pillars
of a unifi ed vision for a more uplifting habitat – architecture, as a creative
act that can fulfi ll its social obligations and still inspire; and urban design, as
the mediator between public policy, individual interests, and the making of
beautiful cities. Underpinning these beliefs is research-driven knowledge and
a rigorous design methodology, innovation and social continuity, technical
excellence and sustainable solutions, and teamwork.
KEY AREA OF EXPERTISE:
• Urban Design and Community Planning
• Analytical and Strategic positioning at all scales
• Understanding Context, Scale, and Place Making
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
• Metropolitan Lofts, Concept Architecture, Los Angeles,
CA
• Center City West Specifi cation Plan - Los Angeles, CA
• Union Station Master Plan - Los Angeles, CA
• Los Angeles Greenways - Los Angeles, CA
• LAX (LAWA) Technical Expansion Studies and Westchester
Community Plan, Los Angeles, CA
• Playa Vista “New Town in Town” - Marina Del Rey, CA
• The Alhambra Community Master Plan, Alhambra, CA
• Santa Monica Pier Reconstruction - Santa Monica, CA
• Stapleton New Community, Master Plan, Denver, CO
• Talo Verde New Community, Guam, USA
• Leo Palace Resort - Guam, USA
• Guam Housing Authority - Guam, USA
• Ford Points Lofts, Adaptive Reuse Architecture -
Richmond, CA
• UC Irvine ‘Main Street’ Master Plan, UC Irvine, CA
• Operation Breakthrough Federal Housing, Philadelphia, PA
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Mitchells Plain New Community, Cape Town, RSA
• Maqiao New Town & Sports Park - Shianghai, PR China
• Sanya Harbor Waterfront Plan - Hainan, PR China
• Maqiao Town South Community - Shanghai, PR China
• Qingdao LOHAS Community - PR China
• Mayland Resort & Villas - Guangzhou, PR China
• Jiangning New Town Villas - Nanjing, PR China
• Gemstone Serviced Apartments - Dong Ying, PR China
• Dianshan Lakefront Community - Shanghai, PR China
• Agile Resort and Golf Community - Shanghai, PR China
• Shams Ar Riyadh Villas - Riyadh, KSA
• Gold Coast Resort Town - Qin Huang Dao, PR China
• Maniao Bay Resort Town - Hainan, PR China
• Bahrah New Community - Jeddah, KSA
• Mawarid Compound : Offi ce & Villas - Jeddah, KSA
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
16
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
RE
S
U
M
E
S
3.1. KEY PERSONNEL - STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Mr. Rao has over 30 years of planning and urban design experience. He
has worked closely with developers, the community, governmental and
private organizations to shape communities that are economically viable,
foster growth, encourage preservation and enhance the overall quality of
living. Much of his work is oriented around using transit as a vehicle for
urban transformation, and development of specifi c plans for communities
across the world. He was one of the earliest advocates of adopting a holistic,
project-based, and data-driven framework for sustainable practices in
planning and design that would help achieve 2030 goals for tackling climate
change.
In the early nineties, he was involved in the design of various transit stations
for the Metro Red Line and Metrolink in Los Angeles, and for Tren Urbano in
Puerto Rico. During his long tenure with Johnson Fain, he was involved both
as a lead planner and project manager in the development of new facilities
for NASA’s Jet propulsion Laboratory, the award winning redevelopment of
Mission Bay in San Francisco, Douglas Park Redevelopment at Long Beach,
redevelopment of Terminal Annex site in Los Angeles, and developing a new
vision for Westchester Southside for Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA).
He was also instrumental in winning several prestigious international design
awards for the fi rm.
In 2004, Mr. Rao partnered with his longtime colleague, Neil Kritzinger
to form K+R. He has been an advocate of interdisciplinary approach to
design where the lines between planning, urban design, architecture and
engineering fuse into one unifi ed approach to the design of human habitat
at large. He believes that such an approach is the key to innovation, holistic
design, and sustainability. One of the earliest advocates of sustainable design
through his work in the late eighties and early nineties, his work has been
published in various international conferences and his expertise as a LEED®
Accredited Professional is at the forefront of innovative sustainable planning
& design.
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES & AFFILIATIONS:
• California Architects License# C33640
• Certifi ed Planner #026270,
• Design Commissioner, City of Pasadena
• Subject Matter Expert (SME), State of California
• American Institute of Certifi ed Planners (AICP)
• LEED AP, US Green Building Council Member,
• Member, American Institute of Architects
• Member, American Planning Association
• Member, Indian Institute of Architects
• Founding Member, Facade Tectonics Institute
• Member, Urban Land Institute
• Member, The Indus Entrepreneurs
EDUCATION:
• Bachelor of Architecture (Honors) (B. Arch). VNIT, Nagpur
University, India.
• Master of Building Science (M. B. S.). University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, California.
KEY AREA OF EXPERTISE:
• Planning & Urban Design
• Streetscape Design
• Complete Streets
• Consensus Building
• Project Management
SRINIVAS M. RAO
AIA, AICP, LEED AP
PRINCIPAL, PLANNER & ARCHITECT
CAB LICENSE C 33640 - FEB. 28, 2027
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Delhi Aerocity Master Plan, Development Framework & Urban
Design Guidelines, New Delhi, India
• King AbdulAziz University Health Sciences Campus, Jeddah,
KSA (Master Plan, Design Guidelines, Architecture)
• Maqiao New Town Master Plan & Design Guidelines, Shanghai,
PR China
• Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Master Plan & Development
Standards & Design Guidelines
• Guiyang Old City 2025 Long Range Plan Framework
• Ledong Conceptual Long Range Plan, Hainan Island, PR China
• Xiaolan Canal Revitalization Plan, China
• Shanghai Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone (FTZ) Revitalization Plan
• Youyang District Regional Plan and Bohai Town, PR China
• Beijing Central Business District Plan, PR China
• Sanya Harbor Waterfront Plan, Hainan, PR China
• Zhongtian Mixed Use TOD Center, Guiyang, PR China
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan & Design Guidelines, San
Francisco, CA (Winner of the 2004 AIA Honor Award for
excellence in Regional and Urban Design)
• Douglas Park Planned Unit Development, Long Beach,
California (Design standards and guidelines for new mixed-
use community)
• Talo Verde New Community Master Plan, Guam, USA
• NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Facilities Master
Plan, Pasadena, CA
• LAX Westchester Southside Specifi c Plan
• Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Urban Design, Los
Angeles
• Naval Air Station (NAS) Agana Base Reuse Plan, Guam,
Territory of USA (Base reuse plan)
• Alameda District Specifi c Plan Update, Los Angeles, CA
• NOHO Commons TOD Plan , North Hollywood, CA
• Civic Center Shared Facilities and Enhancement Plan, Los
Angeles, CA
• LAUSD Miguel Contreras Learning Center Master Plan,
Los Angeles, CA
• NBC Studios Facilities Master Plan Update
• Amgen Biotechnology Campus Master Plan - Seattle WA
• Los Angeles County Metro Rail, Vermont/ Beverly Station
(Underground station design)
• Rio Piedras Underground Station for Tren Urbano, Puerto
Rico (Architecture & Urban Design)
• MetroLink Commuter Rail System Station – Burbank
Airport
• MetroLink Commuter Rail System Station – City of San
Clemente
• Metrolink Commuter Rail System Station - Montebello
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
17
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T’
S
RE
S
U
M
E
S
3.1. KEY PERSONNEL - STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Andres Chaves is a visionary International Architect with over 20 years of
experience shaping urban landscapes and preserving architectural heritage
across continents. He began his career by fostering innovation at the
University of Valle Architecture Research Center in Colombia, where he
spearheaded historical restoration and transformative urban interventions.
Currently, as a key leader at Kritzinger & Rao, he drives complex projects
to success, ensuring exceptional quality and timely delivery. His ability to
seamlessly coordinate diverse teams and navigate intricate design challenges
has been instrumental in delivering impactful projects in China, India, and
the United States. Andres’ rich international portfolio, spanning Colombia,
Brazil, and Costa Rica, demonstrates a unique ability to blend cultural
sensitivity with architectural excellence.
Andres Chaves’ career is marked by a rich tapestry of architectural expertise,
encompassing broad-based design and meticulous preservation projects.
As Principal of his own Colombian fi rm, he demonstrated entrepreneurial
vision and design leadership. His collaborations with renowned Latin
American architects (Barney, Hincapie, Botero) underscore his reputation
for excellence. His profi ciency extends to managing complex projects, from
design development and construction documentation to cost control, honed
through roles as Project Architect, Staff Architect at the Universidad of Valle
Architectural Research Center, and Design Architect at an Engineering and
Development company. Since joining K+R in 2018, he has been instrumental
in the success of major international projects, including mixed-use urban
designs in Asia and signifi cant renovations in the United States, solidifying his
role as a key contributor and design coordination expert.
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES & AFFILIATIONS:
• Licensed Architect, National Architecture Council Society of Colombia
in August 2003
EDUCATION:
• Master in Urban Planning (M.U.P.) Sol Price School, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California
• Bachelor’s Degree in Architecture, Architecture School,
Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
• Associate in Liberal Arts, Humanities & Fine Arts, San Bernardino
Valley College California
• Certifi cate in Development of Inventories and Evaluation for
Cultural and Historic Structures with Remarkable Signifi cance,
Ministery of Culture, Heritage Departmen, Colombia
• Certifi cate in Downtown Historic Preservation, Secretary of
Culture, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
ANDRES CHAVES
ASSOCIATE & URBAN DESIGNER
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Urban Planning
• Delhi Aerocity Master Plan, Development Framework &
Urban Design Guidelines, New Delhi, India
• Cali Specifi c Preservation Plan, Downtown and Historic
Core. Santiago de Cali, Colombia
Public Agency Projects
• Los Angeles Department of Parks & Recreation
-Athens Park Aquatics Center (Historic Buidling
Renovation), Los Angeles
-Alondra Regional Community Park Restroom
Renovation, Lawndale, CA
-Altadena Golf Course Renovation Project. Altadena, CA
-Victoria Regional Community Park Buidling Renovation,
Carson
-Whittier Narrows Regional Park, Building Renovation.
Whittier, CA
• Los Angeles Department of Beaches & Harbor
-Venice Lifeguard Tower Code Compliance Upgrade
Venice, CA
• City of Pasadena, Housing Department
-Pasadena Collaborative Center Code Compliance
Upgrade. Pasadena, CA
• Los Angeles Metro
-C & K Lines Wayfi nding & Signage. Los Angeles, CA
KEY AREA OF EXPERTISE:
• Planning & Urban Design
• Streetscape Design
• Preservation
• Project Management
• Context Understanding
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
SECTION 4 - SOQ RESPONSE
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
19
4. SOQ RESPONSE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
4.1. UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Kritzinger & Rao understands that the City is seeking Consultant services for urban planning, urban design, architecture and
landscape architecture. Services will include urban design analysis, development, review, and recommendations. It will also
include training of City staff on urban design, including but not limited to, introduction to urban design and architecture, as
directed by the City.
K+R is ideally suited to deliver these services to the City due to the following reasons:
-The principals have extensive domestic and international experience in urban design, urban planning, development
consulting, and reviews.
-One of its Principals is a Mayor appointed design commissioner at the City of Pasadena’s Design Commission and serving
his 6th year. He was responsible for contributing to the streamlining of the design review process that is currently used.
Review includes development projects of varying sizes, specifi c plans, planned unit developments, and other public
improvements such as the Historic Colorado Street bridge.
-The principals have been instrumental in award winning master plans and design guidelines such as the Mission Bay
Redevelopment Plan, San Francisco, Douglas Park Specifi c Plan & Design Guidelines, Los Angeles Alameda District
Specifi c Plan, The Beijing Central District Master Plan, The Delhi Aerocity Master Plan, Design Guidelines and
Development Approvals.
We understand that the City is largely looking for services in fi ve broad areas:
New Development Design Review: K+R is well qualifi ed to perform design review of development proposals for commercial,
residential, mixed-use or industrial projects on a single parcel. K+R and its principals have played a lead role in similar work for
40 years. These include urban developments of varying sizes that are shaped by a larger vision of the City’s General Plan and
within the framework of the Development Code. See Principal resumes for some of these projects.
Master Plan/ Specifi c Design Review: K+R is well qualifi ed to perform design review of master plans or specifi c plans in
which new street networks within large parcels organize new development of various types into residential neighborhoods,
single-use districts, or mixed-use neighborhoods or districts. K+R and its principals have played a lead role in similar work for
40 years.
Project Deliverables: K+R has extensive experience preparing deliverables that typically consist of analysis, fi ndings and
recommendations. Our team typically provides these through narratives, charts, graphics, diagrams and other visuals to
illustrate design recommendations.
Collaborative Project Review: When required, K+R will bring its extensive knowledge base and experience to work
collaboratively with the City, the developer and the developer’s design team to refi ne a project design or master plan to better
meet the City’s goals and objectives while also meeting the developer’s objectives. K+R is a multidisciplinary fi rm that provides
knowledge based design advice and consulting that strives to balance these goals.
Staff Collaboration: At the request of the City, K+R will collaborate with City staff in planning and designing public
improvements, including but not limited to streetscape, complete street improvements, corridor branding and wayfi nding,
and other public realm enhancements and improvements. We combine the expertise and knowledge base of a large fi rm with
the personalized attention of a small fi rm to all our services. K+R will work seamlessly with the City staff in all collaborative
endeavors.
4.2. FAMILIARITY WITH CITY’S VISION
The City of Rancho Cucamonga stands as a model of suburban evolution, blending its rich history with a forward-thinking
vision for the future. K+R understands that Rancho Cucamonga continues to refi ne its identity as a cultural and economic
hub through its General Plan and Development Code, which together articulate a comprehensive strategy for shaping the
city’s built environment. These documents refl ect the community’s aspirations for a resilient, equitable, and healthy future,
emphasizing walkability, mixed-use development, and environmental stewardship. In an effort to demonstrate our knowledge
of the City, we have attempted to summarize our understanding of how Rancho Cucamonga’s planning framework guides its
growth, ensuring a high quality of life for residents while positioning the city as a leader in sustainable urban design.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
20
4. SOQ RESPONSE
KRITZINGER & RAO
C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ON-CALL URBAN DESING SERVICES
Request for Statement of Qualifi cations # 24/25-502
The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, updated through the multi-year PlanRC initiative, serves as the city’s blueprint
for long-term development. Adopted following extensive community engagement, the General Plan is structured in three
volumes: Vision, Built Environment, and Environmental Performance.
Volume 1 establishes the city’s core values—health, equity, and stewardship—while providing the administrative framework
for implementation.
Volume 2 focused on the built environment, reimagines the city’s physical landscape through a system of “Place Type
Designations” that replace traditional land use categories. This approach organizes Rancho Cucamonga into districts, centers,
corridors, and neighborhoods, prioritizing walkable, mixed-use nodes of activity over the uniform suburban sprawl of the past.
Volume 3 addresses environmental performance, tackling resource conservation, safety, and noise to ensure the city adapts to
challenges like climate change and wildfi re risk.
We understand that a key feature of the General Plan is its emphasis on transforming arterial corridors like Foothill Boulevard and
Haven Avenue into vibrant, pedestrian-oriented spaces. Along Foothill Boulevard, the vision includes mixed-use developments
with high-density residential units above street-level commercial spaces, complemented by bike lanes and low-speed side
access lanes for parking. This concept draws inspiration from successful urban designs like Pasadena’s Colorado Boulevard,
aiming to create an inviting environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Haven Avenue, meanwhile, is envisioned as a hub for job
centers and clustered multi-story housing, supporting the city’s goal of accommodating 10,525 new residential units by 2029,
as mandated by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Focus Area Plans, such as the Empire Yards Plan near the Metrolink
Station, further this vision by promoting transit-oriented development, integrating housing, retail, and offi ce spaces into a
walkable “urban village.”
The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code translates the General Plan’s policies into actionable regulations. While the
General Plan sets the overarching vision, the Development Code provides detailed standards for land use, building design,
and infrastructure. A notable innovation within the Code is the Form-Based Code (FBC) that mandates design elements like
pedestrian-friendly streetscapes and architectural compatibility, reinforcing the city’s commitment to a human-scaled built
environment.
We also understand that Rancho Cucamonga’s vision for the future is not just about physical development but also about
fostering a sense of place and community. The General Plan envisions the city as the “cultural and economic hub of the Inland
Empire,” a bold ambition for a city historically lacking a traditional downtown. Victoria Gardens, while functioning as a de facto
town center, remains an outdoor mall, prompting planners to explore new mixed-use districts that combine retail, housing, and
civic spaces. Public art and cultural amenities are also prioritized, with initiatives like the public arts fee program encouraging
developers to integrate artistic installations into projects. Residents have expressed a desire for a full-fl edged arts gallery,
refl ecting the community’s growing appetite for cultural enrichment.
K+R is well aware that sustainability is the cornerstone of Rancho Cucamonga’s planning efforts, earning the city recognition
such as the Southern California Association of Governments’ Outstanding Achievement in Sustainability Award. The Climate
Action Plan (CAP), a companion to the General Plan, outlines strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance
resilience against climate-related risks like wildfi res, a persistent concern given the city’s proximity to natural landscapes. The
General Plan’s Environmental Performance volume reinforces these efforts with policies on resource conservation and safety,
ensuring that growth does not compromise the city’s ecological integrity.
In conclusion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan and Development Code refl ect a dynamic vision for the future
of its built environment—one that balances growth with sustainability, connectivity, and cultural vitality. K+R believes that
by reimagining its suburban framework into a network of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, the city aims to transcend its
sprawling roots and emerge as a 21st-century world class community. Through this thoughtful approach, the city not only
enhances the quality of life for its residents but also sets a precedent for suburban transformation in the inland Empire and
beyond. Kritzinger & Rao would love to collaborate with the city on this journey.
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
www.kritzinger-rao.com
KRITZINGER+RAO
117 East Colorado Blvd. Suite 600, Pasadena, CA
MTA CERTIFIED SBE/DBE
info@krdesigninc.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 6E1358B0-A8B7-44E3-B95C-B1EB902286A6Docusign Envelope ID: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: EAF2C513-2CBF-49FD-94AD-577DB701E378 Status: Completed
Subject: Complete with Docusign: CO_2025-071_PSA_Urban_Design_Services_KR_Sign.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 66 Signatures: 1 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Elizabeth Thornhill
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
elizabeth.thornhill@cityofrc.us
IP Address: 199.201.174.250
Record Tracking
Status: Original
7/17/2025 10:42:17 AM
Holder: Elizabeth Thornhill
elizabeth.thornhill@cityofrc.us
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
L. Dennis Michael
dennis.michael@cityofrc.us
Mayor/President
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 172.116.88.134
Signed using mobile
Sent: 7/17/2025 10:43:48 AM
Viewed: 7/17/2025 11:36:26 AM
Signed: 7/17/2025 11:36:42 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
City Clerk's Office Review
ClerkContracts@cityofrc.us
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Using IP Address: 199.201.174.250
Sent: 7/17/2025 10:43:48 AM
Viewed: 7/17/2025 1:26:10 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 7/17/2025 10:43:48 AM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 7/17/2025 11:36:26 AM
Signing Complete Security Checked 7/17/2025 11:36:42 AM
Completed Security Checked 7/17/2025 1:26:11 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps