HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-119 - ResolutionsNOT APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 97-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEALS OF
A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-11 FOR TRACT 14771, A REVIEW
OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS
FOR 40 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 25.35 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF
RINGSTEM DRIVE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1074-351-10 AND
1074-541-21.
A. RECITALS.
1. Lauren Development has filed an application for Development Review
97-11 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject development review request is referred to as the
"application."
2. On June 9, 1997, and July 11, 1997, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed the application and, following the
conclusion of their review, adopted Resolution No. 97-36 thereby
recommending to this City Council that said application be approved.
3. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was
timely appealed to this Council.
4. On August 20, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
Resolution No. 97-119
Page 2
NOT APPROVED
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced August 20, 1997, hearing, including written staff reports,
the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the
contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-36, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a)
The application applies to property located at the northeast corner
of Tackstem Street and Ringstem Drive with a street frontage of
1,020 feet along Tackstem Street and 1,360 feet along Ringstem
Ddve and is presently vacant; and
(b)
The property to the north of the subject site is a Los Angeles
Department of Power and Light easement, the property to the south
and west consists of vacant and developed single family residential
land, and the property to the east is vacant flood control land; and
(c)
The application contemplates the construction of 40 single family
homes on 25.35 acres of land which is consistent with the Very Low
Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and
(d) The proposal is in compliance with the objectives and requirements
of the Hillside Development Regulations; and
(e) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies
with all development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth
in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the
General Plan; and
(b)
That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the
Development Code and the purposes of the distdct in which the site
is located; and
(c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d)
That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare
or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
and
NOT APPROVED
Resolution No. 97-119
Page 3
(e) Based upon substantial evidence provided to the City Council it is
hereby found that none of the criteria found in Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act guidelines requiring subsequent
environmental review exists or are present.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the
application.
5. This Council hereby provides notice to Malissa McKeith, from the law office
of Loeb and Loeb, representing Cucamongans United for Reasonable
Expansion and Mindy Sheps from the law office of Wolf, Rifkin and Shapiro,
representing the Rancho Cucamonga V-Haven View Estates Homeowners
Association, that the time within which judicial review of the decision
represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a)
certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified
copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Malissa
McKeith, from the law office of Loeb and Loeb, representing Cucamongans
United for Reasonable Expansion and Mindy Sheps from the law office of Wolf,
Rifkin and Shapiro, representing the Rancho Cucamonga V-Haven View Estates
Homeowners Association, at the address identified in City records.