Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/08/20 - Regular City Council Agenda Packet Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dennis Michael REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem August 20, 2025 Lynne B. Kennedy g 10500 Civic Center Drive Members of the City I* Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Ashley Stickler FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD—CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY-SUCCESSOR AGENCY— PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found D0 at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086. Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas. CLOSED SESSION — 4:30 P.M. TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 1 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9789 MAIN STREET IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-062-02- 0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CAROL NORRIS, NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7089 AND 7092 ETIWANDA AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0227-121-56-0000, AND 0227-121-55-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD HAMM, PELICAN COMMUNITIES; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, CASE NO. 1:17-MD-2804. (CITY) D5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: IN RE: PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, CASE NO. 19-23649 (SHL). (CITY) E. RECESS CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 2 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS B1. San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) - Measure I Presentation. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 3 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR 8 D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of July 16, 2025. 19 D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$7,733,193.38 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of$12,891,334.59 Dated July 07, 2025, Through August 10, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) 64 D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $16,605.02 Dated July 07, 2025, Through August 10, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) 66 D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue of $1,139,429.67 Awarded by the California Governor's Office of 142 Volunteers (CalVol) for FY25-26; and Authorization to Appropriate $1,139,429.67 in Revenue and Apply a Negative Expenditure Appropriation to Align with the Actual Grant Award for the Approved Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce Program. (CITY) D6. Consideration of a Deposit Agreement with DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Brightline West for Deposit of 144 Funds in the Amount of $1,000,000 as Security for Future Relocation Costs Under a Separate Joint Use Agreement Between Brightline West, Southern California Edison, and the City. (CITY) D7. Consideration of the Purchase of Eighteen Handheld Radios from Motorola Solutions, Inc. as a Single Source 152 Vendor in the Amount of$191,370. (FIRE) D8. Consideration of Award of Contract to Landscape Structures Inc. in the Amount Not to Exceed $931,286.29 for 156 the Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project/Parks Playground and Surfacing Replacements Program. (CITY) D9. Consideration of a Contract with Gentry General Engineering, Inc. in the Amount of $57,480 Plus 10% 224 Contingency for Construction for the Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project (Project), a Contract with Onward Engineering, Inc. in the Amount of $10,400 for Construction Inspection Services, Authorization of an Appropriation of Expenditures in the Amount of $75,200 from the Citywide Infrastructure Fund (198), and Approval of a Maintenance Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the Fencing Improvements. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. (CITY) D10. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-095 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Haven244 Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Median, and LMD 3B Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $422,050 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D11. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-127 with BrightView Landscapes Inc. for LMD 7 and247 LMD 8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $529,450 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 4 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." 249 D12. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-085 with Yunex LLC for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,470,660 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D13. Consideration of Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2020-030 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMD 4R 256 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $587,470 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D14. Consideration of Amendment No. 6 to Contract No. 2020-107 with Champion Fire Systems for Fire Suppression 259 System Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $130,000 for City and Fire District Facilities for FY 2025/2026. (CITY/FIRE) D15. Consideration to Accept Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing Project as Complete, File the Notice of Completion,261 and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D16. Consideration to Accept the CDBG Concrete Rehabilitation Project FY 24-25 as Complete, File the Notice of 264 Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D17. Consideration of Resolutions Adopting Updated Records Retention Schedules, Authorizing Destruction and 267 Rescinding Previous Records Retention Schedules. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-063) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-020) (CITY/FIRE) D18. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure I Five-Year Capital Projects Needs Analysis Covering 416 Fiscal Years 2026/27 Through 2030/31. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-069) (CITY) D19. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal427 Years 2025/26 Through 2029/30. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-070) (CITY) D20. Consideration to Approve and Adopt a Resolution Certifying the Results of an Election and Adding Annexation432 No. 2025-11 to Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-068) (CITY) D21. Consideration of Approval to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 0225-191-32,439 Proposed to be Annexed Into Community Facilities District No. 88-1; Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 88-25-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1; and Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-021) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-022) (FIRE) D22. Consideration of a Resolution in Support of the Inland Empire Job Corps and Urging Continued Federal455 Funding for the Job Corps Program. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-071) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: 458 ORDINANCE NO. 1044 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING BIDDING LIMITS ON PUBLIC PROJECTS, AMENDING LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) 463 F1. Preliminary Review Hearing to Consider a Proposed Master Plan for a 14.5-Acre Mixed-Use Development, Including Reductions in the Non-Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and Design and Site Planning Flexibility from the Form-Based Code for a Site Located in the Center 2 (CE-2) Zone at the Northeast Corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street. (CITY) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 5 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT 479 G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of a Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map, Design Review and Minor Exception — True Life Companies - Site Plan and Architectural Review of a Mixed-Use Project Comprised of 50 Multi-Family Units Including 10 Live/Work Units, and a Tentative Tract Map for Condominium Purposes Located on Approximately 2.3 Acres of Land Within the Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) Zone, Located on the Southwest Corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; APN: 0208-432-16. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under CEQA Section 15332 (SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, Minor Exception DRC2025-00055). (RESOLUTION NOS. 2025-065 AND 2025-066) (CITY) 545 G2. Public Hearing for Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Approve a Request for Site Plan and Design Review of 8 Single-Family Residences on 4.78 Acres of Land on a Previously Approved Tract Map (Tract 14644) at the Terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone, Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay; APNs: 1061-381-24 thru 31. The Project Qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024-00174). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064) (CITY) G3. Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 1045, to be Read by Title 606 Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 16.36.09 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and Adding Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Concerning Undergrounding Overhead Utilities and a Resolution Identifying the Locations Where Utility Undergrounding Is Mandatory and the Regions Where In-Lieu Undergrounding Fees May Be Spent. This Item is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). (ORDINANCE NO. 1045; RESOLUTION NO. 2025-067) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) 621 H1. Quarterly Development Update-Second Quarter 2025. (CITY) H2. Consideration to Approve the Maintenance Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland 622 Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD). Approve the Conservation Easement of 120 Acres Near Cucamonga Canyon [APNs: Portion of 0200-051-48 and 0200-051-49], Authorize the City Manager to Take all Actions Necessary and to Execute All Documents Necessary to Effect the Conservation Easement, and Find the Conservation Easement Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and Consistent with the General Plan. (CITY) 637 H3. Consideration to Approve the New City Manager's (Elisa Cox) Employment Agreement. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS "-- (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) 12. INTERAGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 6 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. LINDA A.TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for Page 7 all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community." 2025-08-20 - Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 From: Anais Rodriguez <rodriguezxana@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 2:42 PM To: City Clerk<City.Clerk@citvofrc.us> Subject: Closed session item D.3 Etiwanda Property [You don't often get email from rodriguezxana@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. To whom it may concern, I'm a Rancho Cucamonga resident and I would like to ask that the property located at 7089 abd 7092 Etiwnda Ave be property for the schools/community and not affordable housing development. This would impact our schools, traffic, future parks, and the housing density would increase. Thank you. 2025-08-20 - Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 From: Sergio Santoyo<serluc1984@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 19, 2025 5:16 PM To: City Clerk<City.Clerk@citvofrc.us> Subject: 8/20/25 mtg Closed Session Item D.3 Etiwanda Property Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem,and Council Members, Us residents here in Etiwanda, have been informed of your plan to allow the building of Low income housing right in the middle of multi-million dollar homes.This is an extremely reckless concept that will severely affect us home owners, not just financially, but most importantly by the crime that will be brought into our neighborhoods. Many of you have probably never lived in low income areas, I have. Over the years, my father always worked hard to better his life and living configions, as well as ours. His goal was for us to live in a great city, with low crime and away from Low income neighborhoods.We moved out here in 1977 from the Los Angeles area to achieve that dream.When I got margied in 1984, 1 too had tge same desire for me and my family,which is why I chose the Etiwanda area. My parents bought there home in the 70's off of Haven, in what was once a beautiful neighborhood- up until they put in Low income housing right next to their neighborhood. Now there are always thefts and car break-ins. I see the same thing happening within our neighborhoods if we do not fight for us, our children and grandchildren who live here and attend schools here. I've also noticed over the past several years since the building of so many low income apartment complexes, that we now have a serious issue with the number of homeless people within our community, something that was never seen in what was once the Beautiful city of Rancho Cucamonga.Just today, I saw a homeless person sleeping on a bench on Baseline and Milliken, and then another one sleeping on a bench on Baseline and Victoria Park Lane.Two homeless individuals within a two minute drive! Once again, something that was never seen in our community before the push for low income housing. Additionally, due to the number of kids that are now attending our local schools, getting the kids to school from the side streets immediately off of Etiwanda, has become a nightmare, and adding another living complex within this area, is definitely not going to be an added benefit for anyone. However,this land would be a perfect piece of land to be used by the schools on both sides of this area as an area for parents to park and walk their kids to their respective schools, instead of stopping in the middle of the street for parents to let their kids out(causing more congestion), since there is nowhere to park. We urge you to vote no and NOT sell this land to a developer who is only concerned about lining his pockets with no concern whatsoever for our neighborhood, citizens and children, but instead give this land to our Local school district to be used by our schools, teachers, parents and it's local residents. Sincerely, Sergio A Santoyo 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 From: Debbie and Bob<bodestmo@gmail.COm> Sent:Tuesday,August 19, 2025 5:26 PM To: City Clerk<City.Clerk@cityofrc.us> Subject: "Subject-8/20/25 mtg You don't often get email from bodestmo@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 111 CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. Hello, we are residenst of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca for the past 32 years.We have seen this city continue to grow and grow. Now it is getting so over crowded on the streets driving and in the our schools. Our schools are impacted and the streets have so many cars it takes twice as long to get to where you need to go. We were handed a flyer today telling the community that they now want to add some AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVEOPMENT right next to an elementary school. The area is also next to one of our bike and walking trails. If you haven't seen the corner of Etiwanda and Highland Ave there are 22 new homes going in there also. How about focusing on some parks for the kids in the community instead of adding more people. It seems like every corner you turn on in Rancho area there are new apt buildings Do you really think that these housing units are safe by the school for one and two next to our public walking and biking trail? Thank you for letting me speak, Mrs, Debra Childs Mr. Robert Childs. 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from info@alberreproperties.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] SUBJECT: Opposition to the Etiwanda Development Please forward my concern to the city council. I am a resident at 12985 Via Regallo and our community borders the proposed development. My daughter attends grapeland elementary school. In the strongest way possible I oppose this development. I can not image that the city council would even consider a development like this in this location. Traffic:The traffic caused between by the two schools is horrible. I challenge any member of the city to visit the site in the morning or the afternoon when the schools is to start or end. We are fighting in order to reach the school in order to drop our children off.There is minimal to no parking and we are forced to utilize the church in order to park. Personally, even though I live next to the school, it is more practical to just walk. It's impossible to just get out of our community to get into Etiwanda just to get to work. Around 2016 there were traffic personell just to stop the cars in order for our community to be able to leave. Safety: Approving low income housing attracts a certain demographic to the area that is detrimental to the safety of the children walking to school, attending school activities, or school sports. Do you guaranty the safety families and children walking to and from school? Zoning Issues : No where around this development or near this development are there any multi story housing.This does not exist in this area. How is consistent with the zoning of the of the area that are primarily single family homes. This site should either remain a historic site or better yet a parking, loading, unloading area for all the parents and residents of this city to alleviate the traffic and chaos created by having two schools on a road that only handles one lane going south and one lane going north. I oppose this project. Bryan Alberre (951)961-8183 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from hairartl@aol.com] Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council I and many other residents of Rancho Cucamonga are very concerned with the continual development of multi-unit, multi-story, high density properties. With this development,the City would be providing the property to be developed and further contributing to the issues caused by high density.The property is just below Etiwanda Intermediate School and Etiwanda Ave. is already deadlocked with traffic before and after school.This project will contribute to making it even worse. I understand that Etiwanda School District expressed an interest in acquiring the property and I urge you to stop or at least postpone this sale to Pelican Communities to explore ways to work with the school district to allow them to acquire this property and potentially solve the problem of overcrowding and traffic congestion rather than making it worse. Even keeping the property would be a better option than allowing high density development to contribute to overcrowding and traffic congestion. Being next to the Pacific Electric trail, a pleasant green belt with a picnic table or two would be a welcome addition to this community or even just leaving it vacant to have a little open space and stopping the stack and pack overcrowding. Thank you for your consideration, Sandie DuBois 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from Jessica Soto iessromero89@icloud.com] To whom it may concern. I am writing as a concerned resident regarding Closed Session Item D.3 on the August 20, 2025 agenda regarding the proposed sale of public land at 7089 and 7092 Etiwanda Avenue. I strongly oppose the sale of this property for private development and instead urge the City to preserve the site for public use such as future park space or a school site. Our community is already facing challenges with: • Overcrowded schools in the area, including Grapeland Elementary. • Lack of adequate parkland, with Rancho Cucamonga currently well below the Quimby Act standard(only 20%). • Increased traffic and congestion from high-density housing projects already approved nearby. Selling this land for another high-density project does not serve the long-term needs of our community. Once this public land is gone, we cannot get it back. Instead, this property could provide a much-needed parking space for the schools for those that have to get off for pick up. Traffic is always congested to residents around the area. I respectfully urge the Council to reject the sale of this land and prioritize the needs of schools, parks, and community over additional housing density. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jessica Soto 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from tdkell(a)-gmail.com Dear Mayor and City Council, I, along with many Rancho Cucamonga residents, am outraged by the City's push for more multi-story, high-density housing. This land sits directly below Etiwanda Intermediate, where traffic is already a nightmare before and after school. Adding more congestion is reckless and shows zero concern for residents' quality of life. The Etiwanda School District has shown interest in the property—why are we ignoring a solution that could ease overcrowding and traffic instead of making both worse? Selling to Pelican Communities only adds to the "stack and pack" problem that's ruining our neighborhoods. This property should remain open space, a green belt, or even left vacant—anything is better than cramming in more high-density development. Stop this sale now. We are many local organizations—we meet, discuss, rally, raise money—and door knock. We will not forget this. Sincerely, Best Regards, Timothy Kell I Realtor@ ...who you choose to work with matters'" Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices CA Properties Residential and Commercial Properties 10750 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T 909 996 5001 1 F 909 684 0480 10 909 980 3100 tdkell(a)gmail.com www.kellhomes.com CA BRE #01413856 BS Architecture and Environmental Design Cal Poly San Luis Obispo 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from Agnes Gibboney angel momagnes(a_gmail.com] 8/20/25 mtg Closed Session Item D.3 Etiwanda Property Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council I and many other residents of Rancho Cucamonga are very concerned with the continual development of multi-unit, multi-story, high density properties. With this development,the City would be providing the property to be developed and further contributing to the issues caused by high density.The property is just below Etiwanda Intermediate School and Etiwanda Ave. is already deadlocked with traffic before and after school.This project will contribute to making it even worse. I understand that Etiwanda School District expressed an interest in acquiring the property and I urge you to stop or at least postpone this sale to Pelican Communities to explore ways to work with the school district to allow them to acquire this property and potentially solve the problem of overcrowding and traffic congestion rather than making it worse. Even keeping the property would be a better option than allowing high density development to contribute to overcrowding and traffic congestion. Being next to the Pacific Electric trail, a pleasant green belt with a picnic table or two would be a welcome addition to this community or even just leaving it vacant to have a little open space and stopping the stack and pack overcrowding. Thank you for your consideration, Agnes Gibboney angelmomagnes@gmaiLcom 2025-08-20 - Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from Tuan Amith <tuanamith2009@gmail.com>] vehemently oppose building low income housing in my neighborhood. It will impact housing prices, schools and see an increase in violence. You need to have an open public meeting instead of doing this behind closed doors. Best Tuan 2025-08-20- Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 [Email from Tuan Amith <Kim Earl <skylane075@aol.com>] Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council, As a long time resident, I am writing in regards to the ongoing development in Rancho Cucamonga. Specifically, the property that is just below the Etiwanda Intermediate School and Etiwanda Ave. My understanding is that the Etiwanda School District expressed interest in acquiring the property. But, you are looking to offer it to a developer in order to build a high-density development. This is in part due to the Government Code that requires the City to give preference to a developer with plans for "low income" housing. Our City is already overbuilt. It is gridlock at various times of the day. It's sad what has happened, and continues to happen, to our city in regards to over development. Why can't you, as our Leaders, push back to the "Government Code" and those in Sacramento to protect our City? Give the Etiwanda School District the opportunity to purchase the land. It makes more sense to allow them to use it in an effective way. Stand up to Sacramento and help our City and school district. Thank you. Regards, Kim Earl Rancho Cucamonga 2025-08-20 - Closed Session: Email received on Closed Session Item D3 siasso@accurate-hvac.com. SUBJECT: Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot Dear Members of the City Council, I am writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed development of low-income high-rise apartment buildings on our historical land in Etiwanda. This proposal, which seeks to sell this cherished property to investors, poses a significant threat to the character and heritage of our community. Etiwanda holds a unique place in our history, with landmarks and sites that reflect our cultural and historical significance. Constructing high-rise apartments would not only alter the landscape but would diminish the historical value that many residents hold dear. Our community prides itself on its rich heritage and allowing development in these areas undermines our collective identity. Moreover, while the intention of providing low-income housing is commendable, the approach taken here is misguided. High-rise buildings can significantly increase congestion and strain our local infrastructure, which is not built to accommodate the sudden influx of residents and traffic that such developments typically bring. These risks compromising the quality of life for current residents, including vital services like schools, emergency response, and public transportation. I urge the council to reconsider this plan and explore alternative solutions that would respect our historical land while addressing the need for affordable housing. Investing in revitalizing existing structures or enhancing current community services could be more beneficial in preserving our heritage and supporting those in need. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. I hope you will prioritize preserving Etiwanda's history and community spirit over commercial interests. Thank you, Steve Jasso COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION—August 20, 2025—Item D3—Etiwanda Property Michael Perez Contact information on file with City August 20, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga Mayor Michael, Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, Council Members Hutchison, Scott, Stickler 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT.Reconsider Action to not make subject property park land and/or support school and student improvements and safety. NOT develop for housing. ETIWANDA PROPERTY 7089&7092 Etiwanda Ave., APNS: 0227-121-56-0000 0227-121-55-0000 Hopefully,the City Council will see the importance of addressing students'safety and acknowledge the need for more parks-which are essential for public health and quality of life -as noted in General Plan and supported by State Legislation. Summary Request STAY and/or rescind current property activities and move project toward either clarification of Park Use and/or Student/School use. Conduct two community City Council meetings at Grapeland and Etiwanda Intermediate to allow for clear communication between Council and interested parties. Present plan for housing and park lands—to obtain and be transparent with community. Students, Parents and schools need help with issues created by increased population and housing negative impacts—from projects approved by City and State efforts. Initially, project site should never have been classified as"Surplus"land. Before declaring the site surplus—a proper needs assessment would have identified two major issues that 1) prevent the site being declared"surplus"or2) allowing it to be transferred to Etiwanda School District. EXISTING NEEDS: • The City's does not have enough park land for compliance with Quimby Act. Site could have been utilized to increase Park Inventory. Page 1 of 5 COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION-August 20, 2025-Item D3-Etiwanda Property o This need for more parks has been noted in City General Plan Documents. o The State legislature REAFFIRMED deficiency of park lands and should be considered prior to finding property as surplus. • —Existing issues at adjacent school sites demand mitigation to improve Student/School safety and conditions. The Etiwanda School District, early in the year, expressed a need for the property to help address their existing needs. This request was denied by City personnel. The city needs to face the students and explain how housing development is a greater priority than their quality of life. Alternatively, the followinggovernment codes no longer pertains-when there is still an identified"need"for land by city/community and students. Calif Gov Code-50569 On or before December 31 of each year, each local agency as defined in Section 54951 shall make an inventory of all lands held, owned or controlled by it or any of its departments, agencies or authorities to determine what land, including air rights, if any, is in excess of its foreseeable needs. A description of each parcel found to be so in excess of needs shall be made a matter of public record. 54221 (b)As used in this article,the term "surplus land" means land owned by any local agency, that is determined to be no longer necessary for the agency's use, except property being held by the agency for the purpose of exchange. Question-Is there no longer a Student Safety concern, and there is no longer a deficit of park land? Does the General Plan and Community input still count? 54221 (f) Notwithstanding subdivision (e), the following properties are not considered exempt surplus land and are subject to this article: (3) Lands within 1,000 yards of any property that has been listed on or determined by the State Office of Historic Preservation to be eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. Question-Is the train station eligible for an Historic Place? STATE legislation recognizes PARK NEEDS SHOULD BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO CLAIMING PROPERTY SURPLUS: Calif Gov Code-54220 (b) The Legislature reaffirms its belief that there is an identifiable deficiency in the amount of land available for recreational purposes and that surplus land, prior to disposition, should be made available for park and recreation purposes or for open Page 2 of 5 COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION-August 20,2025-Item D3-Etiwanda Property space purposes. This article shalt not apply to surplus residential property as defined in Section 54236. 54222. Any local agency disposing of surplus land shall send, VIW to disposing of that property, a written offer to sell or lease the property as follows: @ A written offer to sell or tease Land suitable for school facilities construction or use by a school district for open-space purposes shall be sent to any school district in whose jurisdiction the land is located. 54225. Any public agency selling surplus Land to an entity described in Section 54222 for park or recreation purposes,for open-space purposes,for school purposes,or for low-and moderate-income housing purposes may provide for a payment period of up to 20 years in any contract of sale or sale by trust deed of such land. 54226. Nothing in this article shalt be interpreted to Limit the power of any local agency to sell or lease surplus land at fair market value or at less than fair market value, and nothing in this article shall be interpreted to empower any local agency to sell or Lease surplus land at less than fair market value. No provision of this article shalt be applied when it conflicts with any other provision of statutory law. LAND VALUE CORRECTION NEEDED-FOR PROPER PRIVATE AQUISTION CLARIFICATION OF METHODOLOGY NEEDED Staff report last Listed last site appraisal value at$1,130,000 for 3.46 acres Staff Reported: Land Value Acres Per Acre Value $1,130,000.00 3.46 $326,589.60 Actual Recent sale of 1/2 acre:(same township/block) $545,000.00 0.5 $1,090,000.00 Adjusted/updated true current value $3,771,400.00 3.46 $1,090,000.00 $2,641,400.00 Increase in value GENERAL PLAN UPDATE-EXISTING CONDITIONS-COMMUNITY MOBLITY Current roadway classifications prioritize automobile circulation because the roadway hierarchy is based on the vehicular capacity, type and frequency of vehicular access that is Page 3 of 5 COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION-August 20, 2025-item D3-Etiwanda Property allowed(e.g.,intersection spacing,driveway locations).However,these same streets also need to serve bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. In some cases, for example, it is more important to prioriMme walking or biking over vehicle capacity because of the character of the street(i.e., a downtown shopping district with on-street parking), adjacent land uses (i.e., parks, schools, or mixed-use developments), or to create connectivity between adjacent,,complementary uses.Use of a new system such as a street typology that addresses the overall context of a roadway and the adjacent land uses is one way to provide a more balanced planning approach across travel modes. School Parking is a high priority identified in the General Plan. The School District thinking appears to more align with General Plan goals and directions. Parks-The Parks designation identifies existing and planned public parks within the City and the Sphere of Influence. Existing parks include developed parkland owned by the City. Parklands include traditional neighborhood-level and community-level parks, as well as multi- purpose recreation-oriented lands such as the Epicenter and Central Park. Planned Park sites are identified generally in areas where future residential development will occur. The location of future parks wilt be further defined by detailed neighborhood site planning and the CCi .y's desire to locate new parks adjacent to and integrated with school sites. The City also controls 130 acres of undeveloped parkland not including undeveloped trail acreage. The Community and School District want to make this happen. Does more housing integrate this goal? General Plan-Community Survey Summary Pg 69(City guided survey) Q1.Which of the following images represent a type of NEIGHBORHOOD that you would like to see, or not see, in the Etiwanda Planning Area? Please mark your response along the slider for each image shown below.A higher number reflects a greater preference,while a lower number reflects a decreased preference/aversion. u Sin to fatuity residences with historic charm on suburban tree lined streets were the most preferred. Neighborhood types depicting similar settings but houses that were not as grand were not as highly favored. Muttlawfamily dwellings of aLt types ranked tow in preference" The proposed project is the least favorite choice of the community..... Page 4 of 5 COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION-August 20,2025-Item D3-Etiwanda Property QUIMBY ACT CA Govt Code§66477(2024) PARK REQUIREMENTS: 3 ACRES PER 1,000 POPULATION 5 ACRES PER 1,000 POPULATION 2020 CENSUS 174,453 2024 CENSUS 174,620 Base requirements in State Leg.: 174,500/1000= 174.5 POP UNITS X 3 ACRES=523 ACRES General Plan uses 5 acres: 174,500/1000= 174.5 POP UNITS X 5 ACRES=877 ACRES Needed-100% 347 ACRES IDENTIFIED IN 2010 GENERAL PLAN Current Inventory-40% 2021 GENERAL PLAN HAD NO PARK TABLE LISTED 530 ACRES SHORT-WITH AVAILABLE PARK SITES ALMOST NON-EXISTANT-60% Attached is a Orange County Board of Supervisors Agenda Item transferring county surplus land (11.6 acres) caddy corner to Disneyland-to Anaheim City School District for$100K. Land in the area was going for $5m-$9m an acre. But the wisdom of the Board recognized the importance of the students and community. Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,`','-, MINUTE ORDER td" 4 de T"a 4 944u�aaw eaAm R._1007 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED E OTHER 11 Unanimous IS (1)Smith (2)Silva (3)Spitzer (4)Steiner (5) Wilson Mote Key: Y=Yes, N=No;A=Abstain, X=Excused, B.O.=Board Order Documents accompanying this matter: M Resolution(s) R-97-229 D Ordinances(s) V/Contract(s) A SubmittingAuaQW,Dgpa=entL County Executive Office Igj&: Approve Option Agreement with Anaheim City School District to provide purchase of approximately 11.68 acres of surplus property at 1000-1010 South Harbor Boulevard,Anaheim and make appropriate findings and exemptions-District 4(4/5 vote) File No. Moi Item No. Special Notes: I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Nfinute Order adopted by the Board-of Supervisors,Orange County,State of California. Copies sent to: DARL J.BL MK Clerk of the Board CFO f 60 Bye Deputy c.Auseftinordrud.doc AGENCY/DEPT.USE CLERK USE ONLY CEO REN, V CONSENT Concur p DISCUSSION � f Do Not Concur V PUBLIC HEARING Exempt TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,COUNTY OF 0 GE- ' nN FOR INFO TIONA Rawlings 834-5552 FROM: CEO/Real Estate C. Ansari .. •..m 834-6649 MEETING DATE SUBJECT SUPV.DIST. June 3, 1997 Sale of Surplus Property - Harbor Boulevard Complex (PM 1126-10) 4 SUMrifARY OF REQUEST(Description for Agenda): Approve an Option Agreement with Anaheim City School District which provides the District an option to purchase approximately 11.68 acres of surplus property located at 1000-1010 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim. The option purchase price is $100,006. ADDITIONAL DATA: See Page 2. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTIONS ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Board Resolution No. 95-139., dated March 14, 1995, directed GSA to initiate the process to sell certain real estate assets. FUNDING SOURCE(S) CUI F.FNT YEAR COst' ANNU L L COST BUDGE ? Li YES NO N/A -0- -0- Revenue' Produciri WILL PROPOSAL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL pERSONNEL9 CONSISTENT WITH POLICY? ENO iNO IF YES,STATE NUAW LIMITED TERM 2 [:]NEW OR EXCEPTION RECOAEVY,NDED ACTION: See Page 3. CONCURRENCES(If AppUcable) ATTACHAWNT Public Facilities and Resources Department Option Agreement Summary, Location Map, and Option Agreement ' ' - t CO ©DISHER, DIRECTORC©LINTY EXEGU IVE OFFICE CEO/AD tNIGARY BUR , IEF FINANCIAL OFFICER MICHA RATIVE SERVICES 555e-t =:5.9-97 k J , . a•, z San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Bernardino County Transportation Authority r*lj HISTORYof the MEASURE Measure I Funded MEASU TRANSPORTATION i y 1990-2010 2010-2040 Passed in 1989 Passed in 2004 Governmentssb _ SANBAG cta an ernar mo ssocia a nrnen over s Working Together San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San • • County • • • Authority O �1 ' RV ) l! Measure I Funded do Pf " fl �►�` 1hat pro," how mom Ns at elm still Local ��� �ImPra4ements�. F3�l1►0� generated far prolettST d • � Re�i�r►al � ��` In{raztructure 1mProvertcents $uPP��ed 17Y mbenl�um �� erred on dab ImFec���petlsure 1 yldusoc rrw'K.94��TA.taM 1t5�0�.erd�^"e�r �_ pallhotNY slret 2416. C/,92#10 76 if+�t�el gart�� gi7aAAB# San Bernardino County Transportation Authority ACCOMPLISHMENTSC%**) Measure Funded • State Route 210 Extension • Interstate 10 Express Lanes p Interstate 10 / Euclid Avenue Interchange 1 • Interstate 10 / Vineyard Avenue Interchange Interstate 10 / Monte Vista Avenue Interchange , • State Route 60 / Euclid Avenue Interchange ' d • State Route 60 / Central Avenue Interchange g • State Route 60 / Archibald Avenue Interchange • Monte Vista Grade Separation(Sb San Bernardino County TransportationAuthority r MEASURE I&PCAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS SAI C%**) ,���R ��RoIN: Measure TRANSP ' Funded �RTgjlp— Completed and Current Projects n�a,,,:ti c}RITy • 1-15 / Base Line Road Interchange • Haven Avenue Grade Separation Project " mhMy"e-a R w° omlaes q NC • Da Creek Chanel Bike Trail ` 'id„4s HD ycart'�ro Ase/yty�n*rn�n�kt�°^�a�,•IAp '�"M1elmingy �UCgNjONG/� I be�i �+w n uw s sn aaency4xner�"�r�", t�nssure I Is a half- • Citywide Slurry and Pavement Overlays ,y mph transtpel�uph°rtscritSa°Bet"arahppOns • Pavement Rehabilitation Projects: : "m1hft n.p,sftdanduethph'°ugh°ptR,,,ho'Oana°"IY• F as +angnw xtensi°n Cucamonga, - Milliken Avenue - Vineyard Avenue °^ ;, �e� 'eke Line R°atl,nterehange ` Da - Rochester Avenue - Banyan Avenue : °` i°e51`haneeikerta;, pavemen urYand Pn ve Mdtik,�Aw.nnie�t'onpo erlays - Base Line Road - Foothill Boulevard Y,Aven°e R°chester Av_ Lem°h ehne - Church Street - Archibald Street eanYanAenue Base Lihe ROae - Carnelian Street - 9th Street O church street"are - 19th Street - Rochester Avenue • , sibs he� Arrow Route Crossing Surface Improvements • �ihsaeec _ RO<ryeste.Avenu Amethe • st Avenue Street Improvements S� mP"R°te r�singz Y p mY,taeen r,'ee,mnr°emenis • 6th Street Rehabilitation - Haven to Cleveland ^°AAeu=Rehati"iateeHa°vement, ` '� Future pro. s�mpS lmpr°veme�t°GeVelana /hYs tS i • ADA Access Ramps Improvements M;k°Aenuene�ade$�arati°n waenng Sampling of Future Projects • Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation '' MEgS�RE • Milliken Avenue Widening sibb) • ONT Connector Project — Rancho Metrolink Station to ONT Bernardino County TransportationAuthority C%**) Measure KEY PRINCIPLES Funded Oda ,�• An Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to provide for citizen review to ensure that all Measure I funds are appropriately spent. Only one percent (1%) of Measure I can be used for administrative overhead. New transportation funds will not supplant existing Measure yesterday Today, general revenue spending on streets and roads. -romorroW - Private developments will be required to contribute a fair Making the r . - share toward the transportation improvements around f, their projects. Ilion Measure I funds are regionally allocated based on a "return to source" model. C%**) Give us your thoughts . . Measure I - Funded Octel Visit goSBCTA.com f ' � eA OP • E ,� ,'-�e - ; Measure I �6r t Tvmvrraw -- rtw -. - i San Bernardino County Transportation Authority July 16, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development/Planning, Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, ET AL., SBSC CASE NO.: CIVSB2110388. (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 - AGENCY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: NICHOLAS GHIRELLI, CITY ATTORNEY UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/CITY MANAGER APPOINTEE. (CITY) E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:35 p.m. *DRAFT' July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 11 Page 8 REGULAR MEETING —7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER— COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on July 16, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Patricia Bravo- Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services. Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Deputy Director of City Clerk Services Bravo-Valdez announced the presentation listed as item B1 would be rescheduled to a future meeting due to a scheduling conflict. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS 84-- 2;;n Antnnin Regional Hospital Update en HealthGare Developments and Legislation Relater! to HealthGaFe B2. Presentation in Honor of National Park & Recreation Month. Mayor Michael introduced Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor, and Jenelle Markel, Community Services Supervisor, who presented a PowerPoint in honor of National Park& Recreation month. B3. Presentation of Rancho Cucamonga's Ranking in Wallet Hub's 2025 Best & Worst Places to Raise a Family. Mayor Michael introduced Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, and Tenika Hill, Community Affairs Coordinator, who presented a PowerPoint on survey results from Wallet Hub's 2025 Best &Worst Places to Raise a Family, noting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga ranked number 40 out of 182 U.S. cities, number 14 in the state of California, number 9 in Southern California, and number 1 in the Inland Empire. B4. Update on Suicide Prevention Efforts in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Michael introduced Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II, who presented a PowerPoint with an update on suicide prevention efforts in Rancho Cucamonga. *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 11 Page 9 C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Doug Morris spoke in support of parks, community events and programming at the Lewis Family Playhouse enjoyed by all ages. Shawn Fluke shared his positive experience at Beryl Park in Rancho Cucamonga known for its inclusive playground, designed to be accessible to people of all abilities and spoke in support of inclusive parks and community events to offer various opportunities for individuals with disabilities. Jackie Relph spoke on behalf of the Table Tennis Club and expressed concerns with play time for tennis club members, proposed changing the term "club" with "membership" where individuals could have extended play time for Table Tennis. She provided a list of signatures in support of extending the play time for Table Tennis at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. Ms. Relph was referred to speak with Jennifer Gracia, Community Services Director. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Scott abstained on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company. D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of June 18, 2025 and Special Meetings of June 19, 2025 and June 26, 2025. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,975,430.13 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of$10,595,178.61 Dated June 23, 2025, Through July 06, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $19,706.29 Dated June 23, 2025, Through July 07, 2025. (FIRE) D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of May 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration to Approve the Amended Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024/25. (CITY/FIRE) D6. Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Laptops, Printers, TV, Plotter, and iPads, Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY) D7. Consideration to Terminate Contract No. 2024-214 with Marjani Builders, Inc. for Family Resource Center Rehabilitation Project. (CITY) D8. Consideration to Ratify the City Manager's Execution of a Contract Awarded by the County of San Bernardino to Provide $1,200,000 for Enhanced Development of the Westside Library Expansion Project. (CITY) *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 11 Page 10 D9. Consideration of Approval and Execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Leaseback Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and John Alvarez for Property Commonly Known as 7368 Archibald Avenue, APN's 0208-031-55-0000; 0208- 031-54-0000; 0208-031-56-0000; 0208-031-57-0000; 0208-031-17-0000. (CITY) D10. Consideration of the 2024 Annual Review of the Development Agreement by and Between NAPA SCC A, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Case No. DRC2021-00175, and the 2024 Annual Review of the Development Agreement by and Between Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga, LLC and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Case No. DRC2021-00180. (CITY) D11. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with MNS Engineers in the Amount of $330,190, Plus 10% Contingency for Environmental, Design and Construction Support Services for the Heritage Park Bridges Replacement Project - Phase 2, Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $363,210, and Direct Staff to Prepare a Loan Agreement from the Infrastructure Fund to the PD 85 Redemption Fund. (CITY) DI 2. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with PKI Solutions for Monitoring, Alerting, and On-Demand Support of Digital Identity Verifications and Communications in the Amount of$125,000. (CITY) D13. Consideration to Approve Professional Services Agreements with Six Consultants for On- Call Urban Design Services for Three Years with Option to Renew in One-Year Increments for a Total of Five Years. (CITY) D14. Consideration to Approve the Heritage Park Equestrian Center Lease and Operators Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Alta Loma Riding Club for the Continued Operation and Programming of the Equestrian Facility Located at 5546 Beryl Street. (CITY) D15. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Cooperative Agreement with OMNIA Partners for the Annual Maintenance of Public Safety Video Network (PSVN) Cameras from Convergint in the Amount of$110,000. (CITY) D16. Consideration to Approve the Use of Cooperative Agreements with OMNIA Partners for the Purchase of Computers and Equipment from Dell and Lenovo in the Amount of $256,250. (CITY/FIRE) D17. Consideration to Approve an Agreement for Backup Cloud Services from Amazon Web Services, Inc. Not to Exceed the Amount of$137,000. (CITY) D18. Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with PFM Asset Management LLC, an SEC-Registered Investment Adviser Under U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, for Registered Investment Services (CO #2020-089) to Renew the Contract for Two (2)Additional Years. (CITY/FIRE) D19. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-094 with Colts Landscape, Inc. for General Fund and LMD 1 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $953,050 for FY25/26. (CITY) D20. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-115 with CCS Facility Services for Citywide Janitorial Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $984,576 for FY25/26. (CITY) *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 11 Page 11 D21. Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 1 of Contract No. 2025-026 with Eide Bailly, LLP for an Amount Not to Exceed $120,000 to Continue to Provide Accounting and Financial Consulting Services. (CITY) D22. Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 2022-070 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMD 2 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,746,964 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D23. Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Palmer Consulting for Project Management Services in the Amount of$85,000. (CITY) D24. Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to Contract No. 19-187 with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Citywide Tree Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $2,020,246 for FY25/26. (CITY) D25. Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to Contract No. FD 18-102 with Absolute International Security, Inc. for Security Guard Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $400,000 for FY25/26. (CITY/FIRE) D26. Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to Contract No. 16-262 with BrightView Landscape Services for PD 85 Parks Landscape and Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $83,298 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D27. Consideration of Amendment No. 9 to Contract No. 16-148 with BrightView Landscape Services for LMD 1 Parks Landscape and Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $90,969 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) D28. Consideration of Amendment No. 10 to Contract No. 17-143 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $284,868 for FY25/26. (CITY/FIRE) D29. Consideration of Amendment No. 14 to Contract No. 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems for Citywide HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $977,550 for FY25/26. (CITY/FIRE) D30. Consideration of a Fifth Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC, dba Brightline West (BLW) for a Portion of Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court, Including Revised Site Plan, Grant Deed, and Easements Across Portions of Right-Of-Way on 8th Street, Milliken Avenue, and the Cucamonga Station Property, for the Development of a High Speed Rail Station and Track at the Cucamonga Station in Rancho Cucamonga; and Conditions, Covenants, Restrictions, and Easements Between the City, SBCTA, and BLW Applicable to Each Entity's Property Interests; An Environmental Assessment for the High Speed Rail Project, Including the Rancho Cucamonga Station, was Prepared by the Federal Railroad Administration. (CITY) D31. Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Various Community Facilities Districts and the Special Annual Benefit Assessment for Drainage Area No. 91-2 for the Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2025-048 TO 2025-061) (CITY) D32. Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Community Facilities Districts Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2025-017 AND FD 2025-018) (FIRE) *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 11 Page 12 D33. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2024-2029. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-043) (CITY) D34. Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Unpaid Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Fees and Authorizing a Special Assessment on Affected Parcels on the Next Tax Roll. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-062) (CITY/FIRE) MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy/Vice President Kennedy, seconded by Council Member/ Board Member Stickler, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda items D1 through D34, with Council Member/Board Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 5-0. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION None. F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1. Conduct an Administrative Hearing for the Almond Street Improvement Project (Project), Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. in the Amount of $252,005, Plus 10% Contingency for Design and Construction Support Services for the Project and Authorize the Purchase of Environmental Mitigation Credits in the Amount up to $200,000 from Soquel Mitigation Bank. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 — Program Environmental Impact Report, Section 15301— Existing Facilities, and Section 15303— New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (CITY/FIRE) City Manager Gillison introduced Fire Chief, Mike McCliman and Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer, who provided a PowerPoint with an overview and background on the Almond Street Project. Fire Chief McCliman presented the project purpose and needs, highlighting current route limitations and the need to create alternate route for wildfire evacuation and improve emergency services response times. Principal Engineer Perez spoke about the preliminary design concept and community engagement efforts to understand the community's priorities and concerns. Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing. Earle Anderson spoke in opposition of the Almond Street Improvement Project, inquired about city ordinances related to gate locks and proposed the city install a fence with a manual lock and key. Judith Brennan, Trail Advisory Committee Member, spoke in support of the Almond Street Improvement Project contingent on the city extending the pedestrian and equestrian trail with white rail fencing beyond the current border outline proposed by staff on the south side of Almond Street so that the trail runs all the way from Carnelian Street East to Sapphire Street on the west to provide connectivity to the existing city trail system and public safety. Richard Morrill stated he supports 95% of the Almond Street Improvement Project and understands safety concerns and recommended the city install a swing gate with a manual lock and key or consider an Opticom transmitter device primarily used for emergency vehicle preemption. Scott Morff stated he supports the Almond Street Improvement Project to allow emergency access but does not support access for general traffic as it will impact public safety, increase accidents and cause the loss of urban quality/historic character of the area. *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 11 Page 13 John Ragel spoke in support of the Almond Street Improvement Project as it will enhance public safety for residents in the area and noted he does not believe there will be a significant increase in traffic due to remote location. John Huegel spoke in opposition of the Almond Street Improvement Project due to public safety concerns and proposed the city instead use project funds for street and road maintenance. Mayor Michael closed the Administrative Hearing. Council discussion ensued on the time and effort it would take to open manual gates and impacts on emergency response times, the inability to legally prevent the public from accessing a public street in the State of California, public safety, increasing police patrol, importance of mitigating any potential dangers in the area and response times. City Manager Gillison addressed public safety concerns and informed the City would work with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to monitor crime and increase police patrol as needed although most of the traffic is anticipated to be 85% to 90% residents or guests due to the remoteness of the location. City Manager Gillison also addressed future public development concerns and informed the City is currently in escrow to purchase the entire western half of king ranch as conservation land and remove all development rights, ensuring that there will not be additional housing in that area. Council Member Hutchison inquired if staff will be sharing public comments with the consultant hired to design the project. In response, Principal Engineer Perez affirmed and noted the designs shown tonight already included feedback from the second community meeting. Lastly, she noted staff is committed in honoring the characteristics of the area and will be able to get all community input to the consultant. In response to the notion of the two gates blocking the road, City Attorney Ghirelli noted it would not be permissible under the California Vehicle Code. He informed the California Vehicle Code lists all the circumstances that a City can close a road for and he does not believe that blocking it to everyone except for emergency access would be a permissible reason. He advised that if the City Council makes the decision to build the road, blocking it off for public access would not be allowed by the California Vehicle Code. Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy thanked staff, speakers at the meeting and the community for their participation in community meetings and input. She affirmed the City Council is thinking about the safety of the community and the feedback has been included in the designs of the Almond Street Improvement Project. In response to comments regarding installing gates with manual locks or Opticom devices, Mayor Michael shared past local emergency scenarios and how manual locks/Opticom devices would delay emergency response times. Mayor Michael thanked staff for their community outreach efforts, speakers for providing input and assured that the City Council is doing what is in the best interest of the future of the community and the safety of the community. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve staff's recommendation of a professional services agreement with Kimley-Horn &Associates, Inc. in the amount of $252,005, plus 10% contingency for design and construction support services for the project, and authorize the purchase of Environmental Mitigation Credits in the amount up to $200,000 from Soquel Mitigation Bank. Motion carried 5-0. *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 11 Page 14 F2. Reject Bids Received for the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Project and Consideration for a Resolution Declaring the Project Can Be Performed More Economically by City Staff. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-042) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer, who provided a PowerPoint for item F2. Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor Michael closed the Administrative Hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy thanked staff on behalf of the residents in that area, noting residents are going to be thrilled that the project is being started and is hopeful that by the time daylight savings time ends, the lighting project will be ready for residents to safely walk on fall evenings. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Resolution No. 2025-042 and reject bids received for the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Project. Motion carried 5-0. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Extending for an Additional 12 months a Moratorium on the Granting of Any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for Using Real Properties Zoned and/or Developed for Residential Use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing. (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1043) (CITY) John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor, who gave a Staff Report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G1. Community Improvement Supervisor Price informed the current moratorium on home experience sharing is set to expire September 17th, 2025, the ordinance proposes a 12-month extension of the existing moratorium, providing staff the necessary time to complete their due diligence and develop a permanent ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council that would explicitly prohibit home experience sharing within the City. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications received. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. City Attorney Ghirelli noted the Interim Urgency Ordinance requires a four-fifths vote for adoption. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 1043, by title only and waive further reading. Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services, read the title of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043. INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1043 AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING BY 12 MONTHS A MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF ANY ZONING APPROVAL, HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT, OR OTHER PERMIT, LICENSE, OR LAND USE *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 11 Page 15 ENTITLEMENT FOR USING REAL PROPERTIES ZONED AND/OR DEVELOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR HOME EXPERIENCE SHARING, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Scott, to Introduce, Waive Reading of, and Adopt by a Four-fifths Vote, Interim Zoning Urgency Ordinance No. 1043. Motion carried, 5-0. G2. Public Hearing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Consider Resolutions Confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts; Street Lighting Maintenance Districts; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTIONS NOS. 2025-045, 2025-046 AND 2025-047) (CITY) John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Jevin Kaye, Finance Director, who gave a Staff Report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G2. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications received. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve staff's recommendation and adopt Resolutions Nos. 2025-045, 2025-046 and 2025-047, confirming the diagrams and assessments and ordering the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts; Street Lighting Maintenance Districts; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2025/26. Motion carried, 5-0. G3. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-019) (FIRE) City Manager Gillison reported the Fire Protection District's preliminary budget was adopted on June 26, 2025. After public noticing, the final budget is presented for adoption. Mayor/President Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor/President Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice President Kennedy, seconded by Council Member/Board Member Stickler, to adopt Resolution No. FD 2025-019, adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Motion carried 5-0. *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 11 Page 16 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Presentation from Empire Economics Inc. on the City's Annual Economic and Housing Trends Study. This Item is not a Project as Defined by the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and is Therefore Exempt from CEQA Review. (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Economist, Dr. Joe Janczyk from Empire Economics, who provided a report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H1. Discussion ensued on employment and housing trends in the City. City Council thanked Economist, Dr. Joe Janczyk and received and filed the report. H2. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1044, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Revising Bidding Limits on Public Projects, Amending Labor Code Compliance Requirements, and Amending Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and a Resolution Updating Signing and Purchasing Authority Limits for Public Works Projects. (ORDINANCE NO. 1044) (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-044) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-016) (CITY/FIRE) City Manager Gillison introduced Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer, and Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer, who provided a verbal staff report for item H2. MOTION: Moved by Council Member/Board Member Scott, seconded by Council Member/Board Member Stickler, to approve staff's recommendation, adopt Resolution Nos. 2025-044 and FD 2025-016; and introduce Ordinance No. 1044 by title only and waive further reading. Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, City Clerk Services Deputy Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 1044. ORDINANCE NO. 1044 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REVISING BIDDING LIMITS ON PUBLIC PROJECTS, AMENDING LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member/Board Member Scott, seconded by Council Member/Board Member Stickler, to approve staff's recommendation, adopt Resolution Nos. 2025-044 and FD 2025-016; and introduce Ordinance No. 1044 by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Scott thanked a Boy Scott in the audience for attending the City Council meeting. 12. INTERAGENCY UPDATES None. *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 11 Page 17 J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Mayor Michael announced that the next Regular Meeting will be on August 20, 2025 as the August 6, 2025 Regular Meetings have been cancelled. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 9:11 p.m. Approved: Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director *DRAFT* July 16, 2025 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 of 11 Page 18 S HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Melanie Morris, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $7,733,193.38 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $12,891,334.59 Dated July 07, 2025, Through August 10, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $4,135,904.48 and $3,597,288.90 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $11,990,218.72 and $901,115.87 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 19 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 1/of 44 CUCAMONGA Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 07/07/2025 Payment Date On or Before: 08/10/2025 Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 2,379.76 0 2,379.76 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn & City of Rancho 453039 07/10/2025 Kimley-Horn &Associates Inc 17,940.60 0 17,940.60 Associates Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pacific Animal City of Rancho 453053 07/10/2025 Pacific Animal Productions 1,450.00 0 1,450.00 Productions: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gbs Linens: City of Rancho 453026 07/10/2025 Gbs Linens 1,680.15 0 1,680.15 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Absolute Security City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Absolute Security International 24,169.85 0 24,169.85 International Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors City of Rancho 453012 07/10/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 210.10 0 210.10 Ontario Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies City of Rancho 453044 07/10/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 8,801.47 0 8,801.47 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Palmer Consulting: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Palmer Consulting 3,675.00 0 3,675.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Work Boot City of Rancho 453079 07/10/2025 Work Boot Warehouse 355.00 0 355.00 Warehouse: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dance Terrific: City of Rancho 453018 07/10/2025 Dance Terrific 807.80 0 807.80 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Sapsis Rigging Inc.: City of Rancho 453060 07/10/2025 Sapsis Rigging Inc. 3,500.00 0 3,500.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Waxie Sanitary City of Rancho 453076 07/10/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 4,056.37 0 4,056.37 Supply: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: City of Rancho 453010 07/10/2025 Cintas Corporation 908.19 0 908.19 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inland Empire City of Rancho 453035 07/10/2025 Inland Empire Magazine 1,995.00 0 1,995.00 Magazine: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Msa Safety Sales Rancho 453047 07/10/2025 Msa Safety Sales Llc 0 3,654.03 3,654.03 Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Delta Dental City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Delta Dental Insurance 2,094.66 0 2,094.66 Insurance Company: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Company ATTACHMENT 1 Page 20 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 2/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Parkhouse Tire Inc: City of Rancho 453054 07/10/2025 Parkhouse Tire Inc 987.40 0 987.40 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Main Street Signs: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Main Street Signs 5,039.91 0 5,039.91 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Onward City of Rancho 453052 07/10/2025 Onward Engineering 12,910.00 0 12,910.00 Engineering: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy City of Rancho 453045 07/10/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 27,391.97 0 27,391.97 Systems Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tumbleweed Press City of Rancho 453067 07/10/2025 Tumbleweed Press Inc 894.88 0 894.88 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Forestry Suppliers Rancho 453025 07/10/2025 Forestry Suppliers Inc 0 4,002.14 4,002.14 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 862.20 0 862.20 Academy: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: Rancho 453016 07/10/2025 C V W D 0 840.11 840.11 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Us Department Of City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Us Department Of Energy 11,335.00 0 11,335.00 Energy: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape Llc: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Midwest Tape Llc 4,165.80 0 4,165.80 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Express Brake City of Rancho 453021 07/10/2025 Express Brake Supply Inc 473.84 0 473.84 Supply Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:A To Z Databases: City of Rancho 453005 07/10/2025 A To Z Databases 5,320.00 0 5,320.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Aufbau Corporation: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Aufbau Corporation 15,683.40 0 15,683.40 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gentry General City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Gentry General Engineering Inc 197,487.90 0 197,487.90 Engineering Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:ARC Imaging City of Rancho 453004 07/10/2025 ARC Imaging Resources 5,754.18 0 5,754.18 Resources: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Verizon Wireless- City of Rancho 453072 07/10/2025 Verizon Wireless- La 254.12 0 254.12 La: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Digital Preview: City of Rancho 453019 07/10/2025 Digital Preview 2,500.00 0 2,500.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Lance Soll & City of Rancho 453042 07/10/2025 Lance Soll &Lunghard 36,630.00 0 36,630.00 Lunghard: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Illumixx Inc.: City of Rancho 453033 07/10/2025 Illumixx Inc. 83,913.03 0 83,913.03 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Page 21 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 3/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Roadway Asset City of Rancho 453059 07/10/2025 Roadway Asset Services, LLC 11,425.00 0 11,425.00 Services, LLC: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:West Coast City of Rancho 453077 07/10/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 39,136.31 0 39,136.31 Arborists Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Odp Business City of Rancho 453050 07/10/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 1,206.01 0 1,206.01 Solutions Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Porac Legal City of Rancho 453056 07/10/2025 Porac Legal Defense Fund 240.00 0 240.00 Defense Fund: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Refreshing Touch: City of Rancho 453058 07/10/2025 Refreshing Touch 2,027.88 0 2,027.88 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Uline: 07/10/2025 City of Rancho 453068 07/10/2025 Uline 3,241.12 0 3,241.12 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Active Network Llc: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Active Network Llc 1,044.10 0 1,044.10 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Intelesys: City of Rancho 453038 07/10/2025 Intelesys 1,167.00 0 1,167.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cameron-Daniel Pc: City of Rancho 453007 07/10/2025 Cameron-Daniel Pc 1,669.35 0 1,669.35 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: Rancho 07/10/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 1,252.93 1,252.93 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Wonders of Wildlife City of Rancho 453078 07/10/2025 Wonders of Wildlife Inc 650.00 0 650.00 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Alliant Insurance City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Alliant Insurance Services Inc 17,521.26 0 17,521.26 Services Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Shawna Ginocchio: City of Rancho 453061 07/10/2025 Shawna Ginocchio 48.00 0 48.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Only Cremations City of Rancho 453051 07/10/2025 Only Cremations For Pets Inc 802.00 0 802.00 For Pets Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Transcold City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Transcold Distribution Inc 1,962.34 0 1,962.34 Distribution Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ewing Irrigation City of Rancho 453020 07/10/2025 Ewing Irrigation Products Inc 2,469.08 0 2,469.08 Products Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Allstar Fire Rancho 07/10/2025 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc 0 3,482.64 3,482.64 Equipment Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Rdo Equipment City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Rdo Equipment Company 262.58 0 262.58 Company: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: EM Sports LLC: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 EM Sports LLC 4,889.75 0 4,889.75 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Page 22 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 4/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Working Dogs for Rancho 453080 07/10/2025 Working Dogs for Warriors, 0 12,000.00 12,000.00 Warriors, Corp: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Corp Protection District Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 2,080.00 0 2,080.00 Gershon: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Aufbau Corporation: Rancho 07/10/2025 Aufbau Corporation 0 19,040.00 19,040.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Siteone Landscape City of Rancho 453062 07/10/2025 Siteone Landscape Supply Llc 8,273.89 0 8,273.89 Supply Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Grainger: City of Rancho 453027 07/10/2025 Grainger 456.04 0 456.04 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc: Rancho 453030 07/10/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 627.73 627.73 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: National CineMedia City of Rancho 453048 07/10/2025 National CineMedia LLC 4,433.77 0 4,433.77 LLC: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Amazon Web City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Amazon Web Services Inc 3,407.03 0 3,407.03 Services Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: National Utility City of Rancho 07/10/2025 National Utility Locators Llc 2,325.00 0 2,325.00 Locators Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: D&K Concrete City of Rancho 453017 07/10/2025 D&K Concrete Company 108.75 0 108.75 Company: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: National League Of City of Rancho 453049 07/10/2025 National League Of Cities 12,485.00 0 12,485.00 Cities: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Studio 30-The City of Rancho 453065 07/10/2025 Studio 30-The Kettlebell Fit 600.00 0 600.00 Kettlebell Fit Club Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Club Llc Supplier Payment:Vista Paint: City of Rancho 453074 07/10/2025 Vista Paint 376.57 0 376.57 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:All Welding: City of Rancho 453001 07/10/2025 All Welding 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: K-K Woodworking City of Rancho 453040 07/10/2025 K-K Woodworking (Inactive) 619.06 0 619.06 (Inactive): 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Zones It Solutions City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Zones It Solutions Inc 362.93 0 362.93 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Barbara's City of Rancho 453006 07/10/2025 Barbara's Answering Service 552.00 0 552.00 Answering Service: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: PorchLight Insights: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 PorchLight Insights 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Page 23 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 5/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Ninyo&Moore: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Ninyo&Moore 960.00 0 960.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vulcan Materials City of Rancho 453075 07/10/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 113.97 0 113.97 Company: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: G/M Business City of Rancho 07/10/2025 G/M Business Interiors 3,234.95 0 3,234.95 Interiors: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc: Rancho 07/10/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 1,740.00 1,740.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Iland Internet City of Rancho 07/10/2025 (land Internet Solutions 1,290.63 0 1,290.63 Solutions: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Amg &Associates Rancho 07/10/2025 Amg &Associates Inc 0 113,552.32 113,552.32 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453015 07/10/2025 C V W D 100,457.01 0 100,457.01 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Imprints Inc: City of Rancho 453034 07/10/2025 Imprints Inc 420.00 0 420.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Yunex Llc: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Yunex Llc 43,740.67 0 43,740.67 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest City of Rancho 453064 07/10/2025 Stanley Pest Control 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 Control: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County City of Rancho 453008 07/10/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial 264.70 0 264.70 Janitorial Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Red Wing Business City of Rancho 453057 07/10/2025 Red Wing Business Advantage 355.00 0 355.00 Advantage Account: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Account Supplier Payment: Government City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Government Training Services 17,909.20 0 17,909.20 Training Services: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Snap On Industrial: City of Rancho 453063 07/10/2025 Snap On Industrial 4,970.51 0 4,970.51 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Motorola Solutions Rancho 453046 07/10/2025 Motorola Solutions Inc 0 1,744.62 1,744.62 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor Power City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland Llc 356.62 0 356.62 Inland Llc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape City of Rancho 453013 07/10/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 91,565.95 0 91,565.95 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inland Overhead City of Rancho 453036 07/10/2025 Inland Overhead Door 984.25 0 984.25 Door Company: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Company Page 24 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 6/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Alta Rancho Pet& City of Rancho 453002 07/10/2025 Alta Rancho Pet& Bird Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Bird Hospital: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brightview City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Brightview Landscape Services 68,590.48 0 68,590.48 Landscape Services Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment:Airgas Usa Llc: City of Rancho 453000 07/10/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 2,173.55 0 2,173.55 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution City of Rancho 453032 07/10/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 1,698.02 0 1,698.02 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Zumar Industries City of Rancho 453081 07/10/2025 Zumar Industries Inc. 2,130.22 0 2,130.22 Inc.: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hudson Audio City of Rancho 453031 07/10/2025 Hudson Audio Works 6,000.00 0 6,000.00 Works: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Assi Security: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Assi Security 900.00 0 900.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Circlepoint: City of Rancho 453011 07/10/2025 Circlepoint 210.00 0 210.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Thomson Reuters- City of Rancho 453066 07/10/2025 Thomson Reuters-West 398.00 0 398.00 West: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies Rancho 453043 07/10/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 0 996.20 996.20 Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Consolidated City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 197.63 0 197.63 Electrical Distr Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 270.24 0 270.24 Corporation: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Porac: 07/10/2025 City of Rancho 453055 07/10/2025 Porac 120.00 0 120.00 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Universal Fleet Rancho 453070 07/10/2025 Universal Fleet Supply 0 658.03 658.03 Supply: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Federal Express City of Rancho 453023 07/10/2025 Federal Express Corp 10.00 0 10.00 Corp: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brendon Fung: City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Brendon Fung 12,325.00 0 12,325.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Charter City of Rancho 453009 07/10/2025 Charter Communications 8,434.83 0 8,434.83 Communications: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mariposa City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 190,028.24 0 190,028.24 Landscapes Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hdl Software Llc: City of Rancho 453029 07/10/2025 Hdl Software Llc 21,084.68 0 21,084.68 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Page 25 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 7/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Cps Hr Consulting: City of Rancho 453014 07/10/2025 Cps Hr Consulting 20,000.00 0 20,000.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Dance City of Rancho 453037 07/10/2025 Inland Valley Dance Academy 30.00 0 30.00 Academy: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kwall Llc: City of Rancho 453041 07/10/2025 Kwall Llc 37,500.00 0 37,500.00 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 8,354.07 0 8,354.07 Company Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:American Truck City of Rancho 453003 07/10/2025 American Truck Bodies& 6,102.69 0 6,102.69 Bodies&Repair Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Repair Inc Supplier Payment: Factory Motor Parts: Rancho 453022 07/10/2025 Factory Motor Parts 0 560.72 560.72 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Ferguson City of Rancho 453024 07/10/2025 Ferguson Enterprises Llc#1350 637.94 0 637.94 Enterprises Llc#1350: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Unity Courier City of Rancho 453069 07/10/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 330.23 0 330.23 Service Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory City of Rancho 453028 07/10/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 1,557.23 0 1,557.23 Printing Inc: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Valverde School Of City of Rancho 07/10/2025 Valverde School Of Performing 5,763.50 0 5,763.50 Performing Arts: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Arts Supplier Payment:Victoria Animal City of Rancho 453073 07/10/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Verizon Business: Rancho 453071 07/10/2025 Verizon Business 0 18,472.13 18,472.13 07/10/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Southern California Rancho 453114 07/15/2025 Southern California Edison 0 15,252.99 15,252.99 Edison: 07/15/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453111 07/15/2025 C V W D 46,568.16 0 46,568.16 07/15/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453115 07/15/2025 Southern California Edison 124,261.06 0 124,261.06 Edison: 07/15/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Office&Ergonomic City of Rancho 453183 07/17/2025 Office&Ergonomic Solutions 20,459.94 0 20,459.94 Solutions Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Pars: 07/17/2025 City of Rancho 453187 07/17/2025 Pars 3,500.00 0 3,500.00 Cucamonga Page 26 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 8/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Richards Watson & Rancho 07/17/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 0 1,000.00 1,000.00 Gershon: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Cal Fire: 07/17/2025 Rancho 453134 07/17/2025 Cal Fire 0 525.00 525.00 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Computershare City of Rancho 453141 07/17/2025 Computershare Trust Company 3,500.00 0 3,500.00 Trust Company Na: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Na Supplier Payment:Amg &Associates Rancho 07/17/2025 Amg &Associates Inc 0 139,310.46 139,310.46 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Covetrus North City of Rancho 453144 07/17/2025 Covetrus North America 284.54 0 284.54 America: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum City of Rancho 07/15/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 68,362.15 0 68,362.15 Inc: 07/15/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum Rancho 07/15/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 11,390.01 11,390.01 Inc: 07/15/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Full Traffic Control City of Rancho 453157 07/17/2025 Full Traffic Control Inc 2,489.03 0 2,489.03 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vca California City of Rancho 453210 07/17/2025 Vca California Veterinary 1,466.56 0 1,466.56 Veterinary Specialists: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Specialists Supplier Payment: Heritage Wellness City of Rancho 453164 07/17/2025 Heritage Wellness Collective 1,487.00 0 1,487.00 Collective: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Social Vocational City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Social Vocational Services 4,677.75 0 4,677.75 Services: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing Lp: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Dell Marketing Lp 342.32 0 342.32 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Directv: 07/17/2025 City of Rancho 453149 07/17/2025 Directv 281.98 0 281.98 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: Rancho 453156 07/17/2025 Frontier Comm 0 331.55 331.55 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Katia Lopez: City of Rancho 453171 07/17/2025 Katia Lopez 1,300.00 0 1,300.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dawn Triche Bisek: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Dawn Triche Bisek 360.80 0 360.80 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 27 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SoCal Gas Page 9/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Odp Business Rancho 453182 07/17/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 191.38 191.38 Solutions Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Rdo Equipment City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Rdo Equipment Company 209.40 0 209.40 Company: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Amlon Industries City of Rancho 453125 07/17/2025 Amlon Industries Inc 1,711.43 0 1,711.43 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc: Rancho 07/17/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 1,291.40 1,291.40 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: LML Music City of Rancho 07/17/2025 LML Music Presents 2,232.00 0 2,232.00 Presents: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: B&D Construction City of Rancho 453130 07/17/2025 B&D Construction Co., Inc. 3,500.00 0 3,500.00 Co., Inc.: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Bauer Compressors Rancho 07/17/2025 Bauer Compressors Inc 0 6,633.53 6,633.53 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Gateway Pet City of Rancho 453158 07/17/2025 Gateway Pet Cemetery& 730.00 0 730.00 Cemetery&Crematory: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Crematory Supplier Payment: Chargepoint Inc: City of Rancho 453137 07/17/2025 Chargepoint Inc 9,620.00 0 9,620.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: RevX Wellness: Rancho 453197 07/17/2025 RevX Wellness 0 4,992.34 4,992.34 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Blue Outdoor City of Rancho 453132 07/17/2025 Blue Outdoor Holdings LLC 6,000.00 0 6,000.00 Holdings LLC: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Occupational Health City of Rancho 453179 07/17/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of 2,926.00 0 2,926.00 Centers Of Ca: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Ca Supplier Payment: Face Forward Photo City of Rancho 453151 07/17/2025 Face Forward Photo Booth Llc 950.00 0 950.00 Booth Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hci Environmental & City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Hci Environmental & 1,491.38 0 1,491.38 Engineering Svc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Engineering Svc Supplier Payment:Animal Care City of Rancho 453126 07/17/2025 Animal Care Equipment& 4,814.10 0 4,814.10 Equipment&Services: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Hill's Pet Nutrition City of Rancho 453165 07/17/2025 Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,433.65 0 1,433.65 Sales Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 28 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/11/2 10 of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Daniel Casner: Rancho 453146 07/17/2025 Daniel Casner 0 1,875.00 1,875.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Conor Consulting City of Rancho 453143 07/17/2025 Conor Consulting Llc 681.25 0 681.25 Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Co City of Rancho 453201 07/17/2025 San Bernardino Co Auditor Cont 13,353.50 0 13,353.50 Auditor Cont: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pumpman Llc: City of Rancho 453191 07/17/2025 Pumpman Llc 4,873.00 0 4,873.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Record City of Rancho 453194 07/17/2025 Record Management Software 810.00 0 810.00 Management Software Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus Rancho 453153 07/17/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 24,015.30 24,015.30 Solutions: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Thompson City of Rancho 453207 07/17/2025 Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc 1,049.31 0 1,049.31 Plumbing Supply Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453202 07/17/2025 Southern California News 7,897.92 0 7,897.92 News Group: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Group Supplier Payment: KMEntertainment City of Rancho 07/17/2025 KMEntertainment P03, LLC 2,500.00 0 2,500.00 P03, LLC: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Chino Mower& City of Rancho 453139 07/17/2025 Chino Mower&Equipment 2,346.02 0 2,346.02 Equipment: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Onward City of Rancho 453185 07/17/2025 Onward Engineering 16,535.00 0 16,535.00 Engineering: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mama Said City of Rancho 453174 07/17/2025 Mama Said Entertainment 2,000.00 0 2,000.00 Entertainment: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pacific Mh City of Rancho 453186 07/17/2025 Pacific Mh Construction Inc 2,137.50 0 2,137.50 Construction Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Fleet Services Inc: Rancho 453155 07/17/2025 Fleet Services Inc 0 719.71 719.71 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Grainger: City of Rancho 453160 07/17/2025 Grainger 410.06 0 410.06 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Archibald Pet City of Rancho 453128 07/17/2025 Archibald Pet Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Peninsula Clean City of Rancho 453188 07/17/2025 Peninsula Clean Energy 160,000.00 0 160,000.00 Energy: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/11/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: Rancho 07/17/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 210.12 210.12 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Yunex Llc 195,897.97 0 195,897.97 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc: Rancho 453163 07/17/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 164.41 164.41 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Odp Business City of Rancho 453181 07/17/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 3,529.10 0 3,529.10 Solutions Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Dlr Group Inc 8,565.00 0 8,565.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: 10-8 Retrofit, Inc: Rancho 453116 07/17/2025 10-8 Retrofit, Inc 0 41,040.68 41,040.68 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mmasc: 07/17/2025 City of Rancho 453176 07/17/2025 Mmasc 185.00 0 185.00 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: LIES(Universal City of Rancho 453208 07/17/2025 LIES (Universal Engineering 4,320.00 0 4,320.00 Engineering Sciences): 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Sciences) Supplier Payment:Airgas Usa Llc: Rancho 453121 07/17/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 472.75 472.75 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Fleetpride: Rancho 453154 07/17/2025 Fleetpride 0 68.50 68.50 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart City of Rancho 453178 07/17/2025 Mrc Smart Technology 10,264.28 0 10,264.28 Technology Solutions: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Solutions Supplier Payment: Pedrag V. Pecic: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Pedrag V. Pecic 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Advanced Utility City of Rancho 453119 07/17/2025 Advanced Utility Systems Corp 3,414.74 0 3,414.74 Systems Corp: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pacific Utility City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Pacific Utility Installation Inc 44,880.00 0 44,880.00 Installation Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Econolite Control City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Econolite Control Products Inc 197,572.76 0 197,572.76 Products Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mariposa City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 45,511.87 0 45,511.87 Landscapes Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 30 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/12/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Altec Industries Inc: City of Rancho 453124 07/17/2025 Altec Industries Inc 1,985.07 0 1,985.07 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ninyo&Moore: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Ninyo& Moore 2,289.00 0 2,289.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Base Line Animal City of Rancho 453131 07/17/2025 Base Line Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho 453193 07/17/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber 5,250.00 0 5,250.00 Chamber Of Commerce: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Of Commerce Supplier Payment: Humane Society Of City of Rancho 453167 07/17/2025 Humane Society Of San 175.00 0 175.00 San Bernardino Valley: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Bernardino Valley Supplier Payment:West Coast Lights& Rancho 453215 07/17/2025 West Coast Lights&Sirens 0 21,767.11 21,767.11 Sirens: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Yunex Llc: Rancho 07/17/2025 Yunex Llc 0 58,938.50 58,938.50 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Rose Brand Wipers City of Rancho 453199 07/17/2025 Rose Brand Wipers Inc 4,167.21 0 4,167.21 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gentry Brothers Inc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Gentry Brothers Inc 154,543.52 0 154,543.52 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Valverde School Of City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Valverde School Of Performing 25,627.50 0 25,627.50 Performing Arts: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Arts Supplier Payment: Civic Solutions Inc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Civic Solutions Inc 10,191.25 0 10,191.25 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 20,842.95 0 20,842.95 Company Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Consolidated City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 167.92 0 167.92 Electrical Distr Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Itron Inc: City of Rancho 453170 07/17/2025 Itron Inc 11,734.00 0 11,734.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Nationwide City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Nationwide Premium Holding 965.74 0 965.74 Premium Holding: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Fehr&Peers: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Fehr&Peers 775.00 0 775.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Federal Express City of Rancho 453152 07/17/2025 Federal Express Corp 44.95 0 44.95 Corp: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gentry General City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Gentry General Engineering Inc 48,013.00 0 48,013.00 Engineering Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rehabwest Inc: City of Rancho 453195 07/17/2025 Rehabwest Inc 285.00 0 285.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 31 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/13/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Advanced Chemical City of Rancho 453118 07/17/2025 Advanced Chemical Transport 2,123.00 0 2,123.00 Transport Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County City of Rancho 453136 07/17/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial 6,818.94 0 6,818.94 Janitorial Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Interwest Consulting City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Interwest Consulting Group Inc 2,262.32 0 2,262.32 Group Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Bpr Consulting City of Rancho 453133 07/17/2025 Bpr Consulting Group Llc 2,266.25 0 2,266.25 Group Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Airgas Usa Llc: City of Rancho 453120 07/17/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 919.59 0 919.59 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Department Of City of Rancho 453148 07/17/2025 Department Of Justice 497.00 0 497.00 Justice: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Victoria Animal City of Rancho 453213 07/17/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: M2 Image Solutions City of Rancho 453173 07/17/2025 M2 Image Solutions Inc 888.94 0 888.94 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Shoeteria Inc 673.25 0 673.25 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Allied Universal City of Rancho 453122 07/17/2025 Allied Universal Security 14,615.00 0 14,615.00 Security Services: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Postal Perfect: City of Rancho 453189 07/17/2025 Postal Perfect 90.00 0 90.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino City of Rancho 07/17/2025 San Bernardino County 219.00 0 219.00 County: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet City of Rancho 453159 07/17/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 600.00 0 600.00 Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Occupational Health Rancho 453180 07/17/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of 0 46.00 46.00 Centers Of Ca: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Ca Protection District Supplier Payment: Southwest Mobile City of Rancho 453203 07/17/2025 Southwest Mobile Storage Inc 349.98 0 349.98 Storage Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape City of Rancho 453140 07/17/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 10,695.12 0 10,695.12 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Remmi Construction City of Rancho 453196 07/17/2025 Remmi Construction Inc 16,253.10 0 16,253.10 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gray Quarter, Inc.: City of Rancho 453162 07/17/2025 Gray Quarter, Inc. 9,750.00 0 9,750.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Underground City of Rancho 453209 07/17/2025 Underground Service Alert/Sc 222.75 0 222.75 Service Alert/Sc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Verizon Wireless- City of Rancho 453212 07/17/2025 Verizon Wireless- La 10,192.91 0 10,192.91 La: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 32 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/14/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Antelope Expansion City of Rancho 453127 07/17/2025 Antelope Expansion 3B Llc 71,559.36 0 71,559.36 3B Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pre-Paid Legal City of Rancho 453190 07/17/2025 Pre-Paid Legal Services Inc 191.54 0 191.54 Services Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Alta Rancho Pet& City of Rancho 453123 07/17/2025 Alta Rancho Pet& Bird Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Bird Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ups: 07/17/2025 City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Ups 268.74 0 268.74 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hr Green Pacific City of Rancho 453166 07/17/2025 Hr Green Pacific Inc 6,310.00 0 6,310.00 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inland Empire City of Rancho 453168 07/17/2025 Inland Empire Regional 401.73 0 401.73 Regional Composting Authority: Cucamonga Composting Authority 07/17/2025 Supplier Payment: Moore United City of Rancho 453177 07/17/2025 Moore United Construction, Inc. 22,988.00 0 22,988.00 Construction, Inc.: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Data Ticket Inc 4,972.40 0 4,972.40 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:The Public Group Of City of Rancho 453206 07/17/2025 The Public Group Of Ca Llc 2,387.58 0 2,387.58 Ca Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Paymentus City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Paymentus Corporation 1,449.00 0 1,449.00 Corporation: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing Lp: City of Rancho 453147 07/17/2025 Dell Marketing Lp 561.01 0 561.01 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 3,911.40 0 3,911.40 Academy: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Abound Food Care: City of Rancho 453117 07/17/2025 Abound Food Care 4,034.83 0 4,034.83 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Level 3 City of Rancho 453172 07/17/2025 Level 3 Communications Llc 4,030.66 0 4,030.66 Communications Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brinks Incorporated: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Brinks Incorporated 3,152.56 0 3,152.56 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: International Line City of Rancho 453169 07/17/2025 International Line Builders Inc 159,546.60 0 159,546.60 Builders Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Chief Electric Inc: City of Rancho 453138 07/17/2025 Chief Electric Inc 5,617.00 0 5,617.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cobra City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 418.90 0 418.90 Professionals, INC.: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: City Of Riverside: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 City Of Riverside 6,909.00 0 6,909.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Sam'S Club/ City of Rancho 453200 07/17/2025 Sam's Club/Synchrony Bank 1,174.72 0 1,174.72 S nchron Bank: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 33 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/15/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Concept Powder City of Rancho 453142 07/17/2025 Concept Powder Coating 125.00 0 125.00 Coating: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: Rancho 453145 07/17/2025 C V W D 0 380.15 380.15 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Ventek City of Rancho 453211 07/17/2025 Ventek International 2,070.00 0 2,070.00 International: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Diamond City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Diamond Environmental 576.00 0 576.00 Environmental Services: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: Rancho 453175 07/17/2025 Minuteman Press 0 1,024.81 1,024.81 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: State of California: City of Rancho 453204 07/17/2025 State of California 450.00 0 450.00 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: California Municipal City of Rancho 453135 07/17/2025 California Municipal Utilities 13,544.00 0 13,544.00 Utilities Assoc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Assoc Supplier Payment: Daniel A Moisa: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Daniel A Moisa 1,201.20 0 1,201.20 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:A Y Nursery Inc: City of Rancho 453129 07/17/2025 A Y Nursery Inc 6,093.26 0 6,093.26 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rialto Animal City of Rancho 453198 07/17/2025 Rialto Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Eighth Avenue City of Rancho 453150 07/17/2025 Eighth Avenue Enterprise Llc 2,788.77 0 2,788.77 Enterprise Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ontario Spay& City of Rancho 453184 07/17/2025 Ontario Spay& Neuter Inc 2,678.00 0 2,678.00 Neuter Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vision Service Plan City of Rancho 453214 07/17/2025 Vision Service Plan Ca 11,653.18 0 11,653.18 Ca: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 30,894.50 0 30,894.50 Gershon: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: HILLCREST City of Rancho 07/17/2025 HILLCREST CONTRACTING 127,050.49 0 127,050.49 CONTRACTING INC: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga INC Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 Psa Print Group 53.50 0 53.50 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: vCloud Tech Inc.: City of Rancho 07/17/2025 vCloud Tech Inc. 1,533.89 0 1,533.89 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:The Bank Of New City of Rancho 453205 07/17/2025 The Bank Of New York Mellon 1,875.00 0 1,875.00 York Mellon: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: National Utility City of Rancho 07/17/2025 National Utility Locators Llc 1,350.00 0 1,350.00 Locators Llc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Page 34 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/16/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory City of Rancho 453161 07/17/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 890.82 0 890.82 Printing Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Quadient Finance City of Rancho 453192 07/17/2025 Quadient Finance Usa Inc 6,536.00 0 6,536.00 Usa Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies Rancho 453232 07/17/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 0 1,965.68 1,965.68 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: Rancho 07/17/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 521.83 521.83 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: City of Rancho 453230 07/17/2025 Frontier Comm 2,040.23 0 2,040.23 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies City of Rancho 453231 07/17/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 6,068.51 0 6,068.51 Inc: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Serviam By Wright City of Rancho 453233 07/17/2025 Serviam By Wright Up 198,319.34 0 198,319.34 Llp: 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453229 07/17/2025 C V W D 82,245.32 0 82,245.32 07/17/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Anne Marie Dunn: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Anne Marie Dunn 200.00 0 200.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Robert Anthony Rancho 07/24/2025 Robert Anthony Corcoran 0 1,105.73 1,105.73 Corcoran: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Shoeteria Inc 1,765.96 0 1,765.96 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino City of Rancho 453337 07/24/2025 San Bernardino County Sheriffs 1,995.40 0 1,995.40 County Sheriffs Dept: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Dept Supplier Payment: Studio 30-The City of Rancho 453346 07/24/2025 Studio 30-The Kettlebell Fit 600.00 0 600.00 Kettlebell Fit Club Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Club Llc Supplier Payment:Timothy A Yowell: Rancho 07/24/2025 Timothy A Yowell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Michael R Post: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael R Post 0 2,331.10 2,331.10 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Tryfytt: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 453353 07/24/2025 Tryfytt 1,408.40 0 1,408.40 Cucamonga Page 35 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/17/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Allan J Lee: Rancho 07/24/2025 Allan J Lee 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: International Line City of Rancho 453270 07/24/2025 International Line Builders Inc 127,845.81 0 127,845.81 Builders Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dancing in the City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Dancing in the Shadows of 6,109.75 0 6,109.75 Shadows of Motown Pty Ltd LLC: Cucamonga Motown Pty Ltd LLC 07/24/2025 Supplier Payment: Michael J Ploung: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael J Ploung 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Jeffrey Roeder: Rancho 07/24/2025 Jeffrey Roeder 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Unity Courier City of Rancho 453355 07/24/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 340.36 0 340.36 Service Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Michael Eagleson: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael Eagleson 0 2,331.10 2,331.10 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Computershare City of Rancho 453250 07/24/2025 Computershare Trust Company 1,000.00 0 1,000.00 Trust Company Na: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Na Supplier Payment: Richard Toll: Rancho 07/24/2025 Richard Toll 0 3,127.70 3,127.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Gerald Campbell: Rancho 07/24/2025 Gerald Campbell 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Collaborative City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Collaborative Solutions Llc 9,212.00 0 9,212.00 Solutions Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Steven Campbell: Rancho 07/24/2025 Steven Campbell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Dennis Myskow: Rancho 07/24/2025 Dennis Myskow 0 1,695.04 1,695.04 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 36 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/18/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Brent Roberts: Rancho 07/24/2025 Brent Roberts 0 1,086.55 1,086.55 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Pacific Coast City of Rancho 453324 07/24/2025 Pacific Coast Entertainment 7,645.26 0 7,645.26 Entertainment: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: City of Rancho 453280 07/24/2025 Minuteman Press 298.20 0 298.20 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tom O'Brien: Rancho 07/24/2025 Tom O'Brien 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Peter Magnuson: Rancho 07/24/2025 Peter Magnuson 0 1,685.46 1,685.46 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Donald Heyde: Rancho 07/24/2025 Donald Heyde 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:William Spain: Rancho 07/24/2025 William Spain 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary City of Rancho 453278 07/24/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 237.14 0 237.14 Supply Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hudson Audio City of Rancho 453265 07/24/2025 Hudson Audio Works 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 Works: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc: City of Rancho 453245 07/24/2025 Boot Barn Inc 1,047.12 0 1,047.12 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& Rancho 07/24/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 0 768.00 768.00 Gershon: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Robert Eggers: Rancho 07/24/2025 Robert Eggers 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mary Jane Nelson: Rancho 07/24/2025 Mary Jane Nelson 0 185.08 185.08 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 37 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/19/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Sargent Town City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Sargent Town Planning Inc 30,272.50 0 30,272.50 Planning Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Darrell Luttrull: Rancho 07/24/2025 Darrell Luttrull 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Sovic Creative 575.00 0 575.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Patrick Jerkins: Rancho 07/24/2025 Patrick Jerkins 0 1,695.04 1,695.04 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Newco Distributors City of Rancho 453283 07/24/2025 Newco Distributors Inc 1,386.53 0 1,386.53 Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mig Inc: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 453279 07/24/2025 Mig Inc 2,263.75 0 2,263.75 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mediwaste City of Rancho 453277 07/24/2025 Mediwaste Disposal 81.25 0 81.25 Disposal: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Donald R Rancho 07/24/2025 Donald R Cloughesy 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 Cloughesy: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Lloyd Almand: Rancho 07/24/2025 Lloyd Almand 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Kenneth Walker: Rancho 453273 07/24/2025 Kenneth Walker 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Ivan M Rojer: Rancho 07/24/2025 Ivan M Rojer 0 2,250.95 2,250.95 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Palomar Health City of Rancho 453325 07/24/2025 Palomar Health Forensic 1,100.00 0 1,100.00 Forensic Services: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Jackie Deans: Rancho 07/24/2025 Jackie Deans 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 38 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/11/2 20 of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Ron Mayfield: Rancho 07/24/2025 Ron Mayfield 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Danny G Holt: Rancho 07/24/2025 Danny G Holt 0 1,730.68 1,730.68 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Karl Cox: Rancho 07/24/2025 Karl Cox 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: United Site City of Rancho 453354 07/24/2025 United Site Services 305.29 0 305.29 Services: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Theatre 68: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Theatre 68 5,000.00 0 5,000.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Terra Vista Animal City of Rancho 453351 07/24/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Swank Motion City of Rancho 453348 07/24/2025 Swank Motion Pictures Inc 750.00 0 750.00 Pictures Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:William M Rancho 07/24/2025 William M Kirkpatrick 0 907.46 907.46 Kirkpatrick: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Hlp Inc: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 453264 07/24/2025 Hlp Inc 31,680.00 0 31,680.00 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Joe Longo: Rancho 07/24/2025 Joe Longo 0 185.08 185.08 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: L. Dennis Michael: Rancho 07/24/2025 L. Dennis Michael 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Napa Auto Parts 75.96 0 75.96 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rosalyn Interlicchia: Rancho 07/24/2025 Rosalyn Interlicchia 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Bpr Consulting City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Bpr Consulting Group Llc 17,498.44 0 17,498.44 Group Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Page 39 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/21/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Anthony Varney: Rancho 07/24/2025 Anthony Varney 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Red Hot Tribute: City of Rancho 453333 07/24/2025 Red Hot Tribute 2,500.00 0 2,500.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr City of Rancho 453276 07/24/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply 140.69 0 140.69 Supply Company: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Company Supplier Payment: Philip Loncar: Rancho 07/24/2025 Philip Loncar 0 1,086.55 1,086.55 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Valverde Stage City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Valverde Stage Productions Inc 29,000.00 0 29,000.00 Productions Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Red Wing Business City of Rancho 453334 07/24/2025 Red Wing Business Advantage 355.00 0 355.00 Advantage Account: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Account Supplier Payment: G/M Business City of Rancho 07/24/2025 G/M Business Interiors 2,044.53 0 2,044.53 Interiors: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Terry Tuley: Rancho 07/24/2025 Terry Tuley 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Such A Voice Llc: City of Rancho 453347 07/24/2025 Such A Voice Llc 63.00 0 63.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Robin Brock: Rancho 07/24/2025 Robin Brock 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Ocic Inc: City of Rancho 453285 07/24/2025 Ocic Inc 9,553.00 0 9,553.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: John Mckee: Rancho 07/24/2025 John Mckee 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Verizon: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 453356 07/24/2025 Verizon 24.47 0 24.47 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ninyo&Moore: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Ninyo& Moore 14,535.00 0 14,535.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: City of Rancho 453339 07/24/2025 Shred Pros 275.00 0 275.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Page 40 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/22/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Ronald Smith: Rancho 07/24/2025 Ronald Smith 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Magic Makers City of Rancho 453274 07/24/2025 Magic Makers Entertainment 400.00 0 400.00 Entertainment Inc.: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Inc. Supplier Payment: Fehr&Peers: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Fehr&Peers 3,230.00 0 3,230.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: David W Larkin: Rancho 07/24/2025 David W Larkin 0 768.52 768.52 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Alexander R Rancho 07/24/2025 Alexander R Ahumada 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Ahumada: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Nv5 Inc: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 453284 07/24/2025 Nv5 Inc 11,799.95 0 11,799.95 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: J J Keller& City of Rancho 453272 07/24/2025 J J Keller&Associates Inc 5,145.88 0 5,145.88 Associates Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dennis M Costello: Rancho 07/24/2025 Dennis M Costello 0 2,331.10 2,331.10 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Certified Towing Inc: City of Rancho 453248 07/24/2025 Certified Towing Inc 200.00 0 200.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Triden Group Corp: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Triden Group Corp 16,802.50 0 16,802.50 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Steven Taylor: Rancho 07/24/2025 Steven Taylor 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Advanced Chemical City of Rancho 453236 07/24/2025 Advanced Chemical Transport 289.50 0 289.50 Transport Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 94,881.70 0 94,881.70 Company Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Odp Business City of Rancho 453286 07/24/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 2,233.32 0 2,233.32 Solutions Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Victoria Bantau: Rancho 07/24/2025 Victoria Bantau 0 658.62 658.62 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 41 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/23/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Action Awards Inc: City of Rancho 453234 07/24/2025 Action Awards Inc 686.70 0 686.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: James Curatalo: Rancho 07/24/2025 James Curatalo 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 500.40 0 500.40 Academy: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Covetrus North City of Rancho 453253 07/24/2025 Covetrus North America 1,862.36 0 1,862.36 America: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 7,920.61 0 7,920.61 Gershon: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southwest Mobile City of Rancho 453345 07/24/2025 Southwest Mobile Storage Inc 349.98 0 349.98 Storage Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Beverly Mackall: Rancho 07/24/2025 Beverly Mackall 0 185.08 185.08 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: Rancho 453338 07/24/2025 Shred Pros 0 68.00 68.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Waxie Sanitary City of Rancho 453360 07/24/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 202.30 0 202.30 Supply: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inyo Networks Inc: City of Rancho 453271 07/24/2025 Inyo Networks Inc 11,119.50 0 11,119.50 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Socal Gas- Remit- City of Rancho 453342 07/24/2025 Socal Gas 887.53 0 887.53 To:Yard-Socal Gas: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Experian: City of Rancho 453257 07/24/2025 Experian 50.00 0 50.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cheryl L Roberts: Rancho 07/24/2025 Cheryl L Roberts 0 3,077.83 3,077.83 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Thompson City of Rancho 453352 07/24/2025 Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc 45.29 0 45.29 Plumbing Supply Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc: Rancho 453262 07/24/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 1,143.01 1,143.01 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 42 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/24/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Richard Clabby: Rancho 07/24/2025 Richard Clabby 0 817.12 817.12 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Behavior Analysis City of Rancho 453243 07/24/2025 Behavior Analysis Training Llc 575.00 0 575.00 Training Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Rancho 453336 07/24/2025 San Bernardino County 0 13,159.36 13,159.36 County: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Scott D Sorensen: Rancho 07/24/2025 Scott D Sorensen 0 1,671.25 1,671.25 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Fleetcrew: City of Rancho 453258 07/24/2025 Fleetcrew 364.00 0 364.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Susan De Antonio: Rancho 07/24/2025 Susan De Antonio 0 1,105.73 1,105.73 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Art-Z Mom Face City of Rancho 453239 07/24/2025 Art-Z Mom Face Painting 360.00 0 360.00 Painting: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tim Fejeran: Rancho 07/24/2025 Tim Fejeran 0 2,250.95 2,250.95 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Kenneth Mcneil: Rancho 07/24/2025 Kenneth Mcneil 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Yunex Llc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Yunex Llc 64,307.62 0 64,307.62 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pacific Utility City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Pacific Utility Installation Inc 162,882.18 0 162,882.18 Installation Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Patrick Proulx: Rancho 07/24/2025 Patrick Proulx 0 1,690.43 1,690.43 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Pip Printing: City of Rancho 453330 07/24/2025 Pip Printing 1,163.70 0 1,163.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:ADP, Inc.: City of Rancho 453235 07/24/2025 ADP, Inc. 203.10 0 203.10 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Page 43 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/25/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Victor Rodriguez: Rancho 453357 07/24/2025 Victor Rodriguez 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Michael Redmond: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael Redmond 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: James Dague: Rancho 07/24/2025 James Dague 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Hill's Pet Nutrition City of Rancho 453263 07/24/2025 Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,197.36 0 1,197.36 Sales Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Roadway City of Rancho 453335 07/24/2025 Roadway Engineering and 21,018.23 0 21,018.23 Engineering and Construction Corp: Cucamonga Construction Corp 07/24/2025 Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory City of Rancho 453260 07/24/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 85.66 0 85.66 Printing Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Thomas Salisbury: Rancho 07/24/2025 Thomas Salisbury 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Braun Blaising& City of Rancho 453246 07/24/2025 Braun Blaising&Wynne Pc 924.88 0 924.88 Wynne Pc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Jay Davenport: Rancho 07/24/2025 Jay Davenport 0 3,077.83 3,077.83 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Software House City of Rancho 453343 07/24/2025 Software House International 94,887.39 0 94,887.39 International Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment:Archibald Pet City of Rancho 453238 07/24/2025 Archibald Pet Hospital 400.00 0 400.00 Hospital: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vulcan Materials City of Rancho 453359 07/24/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 572.13 0 572.13 Company: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Awe Acquisition Inc: City of Rancho 453242 07/24/2025 Awe Acquisition Inc 2,200.00 0 2,200.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Viola Spagnolo: Rancho 453358 07/24/2025 Viola Spagnolo 0 329.56 329.56 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 44 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/26/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Inland Empire Rancho 453268 07/24/2025 Inland Empire Property Service 0 97,388.75 97,388.75 Property Service Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Inc Protection District Supplier Payment: Creative Brain City of Rancho 453254 07/24/2025 Creative Brain Learning Llc 1,440.00 0 1,440.00 Learning Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Animal Blood City of Rancho 453237 07/24/2025 Animal Blood Resources 385.75 0 385.75 Resources International: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga International Supplier Payment: Inland Presort& City of Rancho 453269 07/24/2025 Inland Presort&Mailing 333.05 0 333.05 Mailing Services: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Mayweather Boxing City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Mayweather Boxing &Fitness 450.00 0 450.00 &Fitness: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Wilson& Bell Auto City of Rancho 453363 07/24/2025 Wilson &Bell Auto Service 895.45 0 895.45 Service: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: David Freeman: City of Rancho 453255 07/24/2025 David Freeman 200.00 0 200.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape Llc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Midwest Tape Llc 499.04 0 499.04 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Henkels& Mccoy City of Rancho 453261 07/24/2025 Henkels&Mccoy West Llc 220,606.50 0 220,606.50 West Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Paul E Lenze: Rancho 07/24/2025 Paul E Lenze 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health: City of Rancho 453282 07/24/2025 Mwi Animal Health 2,503.50 0 2,503.50 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ralph Crane: Rancho 07/24/2025 Ralph Crane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Ascent City of Rancho 453240 07/24/2025 Ascent Environmental Inc 34,155.91 0 34,155.91 Environmental Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kevin Walton: Rancho 07/24/2025 Kevin Walton 0 658.62 658.62 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Stephen Kilmer: Rancho 07/24/2025 Stephen Kilmer 0 610.52 610.52 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Grainger: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Grainger 1,189.51 0 1,189.51 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Page 45 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/27/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Blow Entertaiment City of Rancho 453244 07/24/2025 Blow Entertaiment Group Llc 2,250.00 0 2,250.00 Group Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Dlr Group Inc 14,798.79 0 14,798.79 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Byron Morgan: Rancho 07/24/2025 Byron Morgan 0 515.44 515.44 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Eric Noreen: Rancho 07/24/2025 Eric Noreen 0 3,127.70 3,127.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Rancho West City of Rancho 453332 07/24/2025 Rancho West Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Animal Hospital: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Charlene Dominick: Rancho 453249 07/24/2025 Charlene Dominick 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution City of Rancho 453267 07/24/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 360.42 0 360.42 Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Placeworks: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Placeworks 1,805.00 0 1,805.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Willdan Group: City of Rancho 453362 07/24/2025 Willdan Group 8,245.75 0 8,245.75 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mark Thomas& City of Rancho 453275 07/24/2025 Mark Thomas&Company, Inc. 20,347.25 0 20,347.25 Company, Inc.: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 62,477.61 0 62,477.61 Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Avast City of Rancho 453241 07/24/2025 Avast Entertainment 560.00 0 560.00 Entertainment: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pfm Asset City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Pfm Asset Management Llc 20,024.97 0 20,024.97 Management Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: John D Fritchey: Rancho 07/24/2025 John D Fritchey 0 658.62 658.62 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Wilbur Crossland: Rancho 07/24/2025 Wilbur Crossland 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 46 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/28/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:William Lane: Rancho 07/24/2025 William Lane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Counts Unlimited: City of Rancho 453252 07/24/2025 Counts Unlimited 3,410.00 0 3,410.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Daisyeco Inc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Daisyeco Inc 816.27 0 816.27 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kenneth Carnes: Rancho 07/24/2025 Kenneth Carnes 0 185.08 185.08 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Francis Rancho 07/24/2025 Francis Vanderkallen 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Vanderkallen: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Corodata Media City of Rancho 453251 07/24/2025 Corodata Media Storage Inc 90.10 0 90.10 Storage Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Innovative City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Innovative Interfaces Inc 26,518.30 0 26,518.30 Interfaces Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Susan Bazal: Rancho 07/24/2025 Susan Bazal 0 426.70 426.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Cardio Partners Inc: Rancho 453247 07/24/2025 Cardio Partners Inc 0 5,887.70 5,887.70 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Aufbau Corporation: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Aufbau Corporation 13,934.55 0 13,934.55 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Teamcalifornia City of Rancho 453349 07/24/2025 Teamcalifornia Economic 550.00 0 550.00 Economic Development: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Development Supplier Payment: James Sullivan: Rancho 07/24/2025 James Sullivan 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Dependable Break City of Rancho 453256 07/24/2025 Dependable Break Room 31.96 0 31.96 Room Solutions Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Solutions Inc Supplier Payment: David Berry: Rancho 07/24/2025 David Berry 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 47 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/29/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: City of Rancho 453259 07/24/2025 Frontier Comm 64.48 0 64.48 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Michael Nauman: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael Nauman 0 528.16 528.16 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Husky Boy City of Rancho 453266 07/24/2025 Husky Boy Corporation 18,187.50 0 18,187.50 Corporation: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho 453331 07/24/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber 4,204.00 0 4,204.00 Chamber Of Commerce: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Of Commerce Supplier Payment: Michael L Bell: Rancho 07/24/2025 Michael L Bell 0 1,690.43 1,690.43 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: MNS Engineers, City of Rancho 453281 07/24/2025 MNS Engineers, Inc. 9,941.25 0 9,941.25 Inc.: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Data Ticket Inc 4,793.96 0 4,793.96 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Westbound City of Rancho 453361 07/24/2025 Westbound Communications 30,978.46 0 30,978.46 Communications Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Opticos Design, City of Rancho 453287 07/24/2025 Opticos Design, Inc. 4,500.00 0 4,500.00 Inc.: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Teresa Smith: City of Rancho 453350 07/24/2025 Teresa Smith 500.00 0 500.00 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453344 07/24/2025 Southern California Edison 4,024.65 0 4,024.65 Edison- Remit-To: RCMU: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr City of Rancho 453369 07/24/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply 239.39 0 239.39 Supply Company: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Company Supplier Payment: Upsco Powersafe City of Rancho 453374 07/24/2025 Upsco Powersafe Systems Inc 23,325.72 0 23,325.72 Systems Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Musicland: City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Musicland 178.50 0 178.50 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:T&B Planning Inc: City of Rancho 453373 07/24/2025 T&B Planning Inc 4,647.50 0 4,647.50 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453372 07/24/2025 Southern California Edison 23,380.18 0 23,380.18 Edison: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vulcan Materials City of Rancho 453375 07/24/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 115.11 0 115.11 Company: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Odp Business Rancho 453370 07/24/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 93.29 93.29 Solutions Llc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 48 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/11/2 30 of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Chino Mower& City of Rancho 453366 07/24/2025 Chino Mower&Equipment 826.20 0 826.20 Equipment: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Ascent City of Rancho 453364 07/24/2025 Ascent Environmental Inc 33,373.53 0 33,373.53 Environmental Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc: City of Rancho 453365 07/24/2025 Boot Barn Inc 2,120.72 0 2,120.72 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brightview City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Brightview Landscape Services 42,224.36 0 42,224.36 Landscape Services Inc: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453367 07/24/2025 C V W D 77,641.58 0 77,641.58 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: Rancho 453368 07/24/2025 C V W D 0 0.99 0.99 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Ups: 07/24/2025 City of Rancho 07/24/2025 Ups 63.54 0 63.54 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Constellation City of Rancho 07/28/2025 Constellation Energy 690,284.00 0 690,284.00 Energy Generation Llc: 07/28/2025 Cucamonga Generation Llc Supplier Payment: Cobra Rancho 07/31/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 0 176.90 176.90 Professionals, INC.: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Publiclnput: Rancho 453466 07/31/2025 Publiclnput 0 39,661.00 39,661.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County City of Rancho 453417 07/31/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial 960.00 0 960.00 Janitorial Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Brodart Co: City of Rancho 453414 07/31/2025 Brodart Co 42,593.85 0 42,593.85 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Alma Arocho: City of Rancho 453404 07/31/2025 Alma Arocho 993.60 0 993.60 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Directv: 07/31/2025 City of Rancho 453435 07/31/2025 Directv 84.37 0 84.37 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Liebert Cassidy City of Rancho 453449 07/31/2025 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 632.00 0 632.00 Whitmore: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Cty City of Rancho 453476 07/31/2025 San Bernardino Cty Tax 26.00 0 26.00 Tax Collector: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Collector Supplier Payment: Chino Mower& City of Rancho 453420 07/31/2025 Chino Mower& Equipment 1,570.62 0 1,570.62 Equipment: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Fehr&Peers: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Fehr&Peers 3,522.50 0 3,522.50 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 49 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/31/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Robert Morales: City of Rancho 453472 07/31/2025 Robert Morales 542.50 0 542.50 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: City of Rancho 453479 07/31/2025 Shred Pros 65.00 0 65.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Occupational Health City of Rancho 453459 07/31/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of 796.00 0 796.00 Centers Of Ca: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Ca Supplier Payment: Knight Leadership City of Rancho 453448 07/31/2025 Knight Leadership Solutions 2,000.00 0 2,000.00 Solutions: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vulcan Materials City of Rancho 453496 07/31/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 341.91 0 341.91 Company: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Helen Smith- City of Rancho 453442 07/31/2025 Helen Smith-Nichols 75.00 0 75.00 Nichols: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mariposa City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 200,126.63 0 200,126.63 Landscapes Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Westbound City of Rancho 453497 07/31/2025 Westbound Communications 13,176.73 0 13,176.73 Communications Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Hometown America City of Rancho 453443 07/31/2025 Hometown America- Ramona 300.00 0 300.00 - Ramona Villa Mhp: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Villa Mhp Supplier Payment: Fontana Radiator Rancho 453439 07/31/2025 Fontana Radiator Service 0 295.00 295.00 Service: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: Rancho 453455 07/31/2025 Minuteman Press 0 684.05 684.05 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Wilson Fiallos: City of Rancho 453500 07/31/2025 Wilson Fiallos 2,496.00 0 2,496.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mr T'S Towing Inc: City of Rancho 453457 07/31/2025 Mr T'S Towing Inc 330.00 0 330.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum Rancho 07/31/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 31,763.19 31,763.19 Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: City of Rancho 453454 07/31/2025 Minuteman Press 1,494.41 0 1,494.41 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Yunex Llc: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Yunex Llc 53,613.93 0 53,613.93 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Musicland: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Musicland 1,190.00 0 1,190.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Unity Courier City of Rancho 453491 07/31/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 669.03 0 669.03 Service Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 50 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/32/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet City of Rancho 453441 07/31/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 400.00 0 400.00 Hospital: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Universal Fleet Rancho 453492 07/31/2025 Universal Fleet Supply 0 554.34 554.34 Supply: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Alta Laguna Mobile City of Rancho 453405 07/31/2025 Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park 300.00 0 300.00 Home Park-Ca Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga -Ca Llc Supplier Payment: Safe Moves: City of Rancho 453473 07/31/2025 Safe Moves 1,500.00 0 1,500.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Young Rembrandts: City of Rancho 453501 07/31/2025 Young Rembrandts 648.00 0 648.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Associated Students City of Rancho 453411 07/31/2025 Associated Students Inc., 9,554.00 0 9,554.00 Inc., California Polytechnic University Cucamonga California Polytechnic University Pomona: 07/31/2025 Pomona Supplier Payment: Lu'S Lighthouse Inc: City of Rancho 453451 07/31/2025 Lu'S Lighthouse Inc 37.30 0 37.30 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mango Languages: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Mango Languages 11,947.01 0 11,947.01 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Crafstman Label: Rancho 453429 07/31/2025 Crafstman Label 0 479.69 479.69 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:American Registry City of Rancho 453408 07/31/2025 American Registry For Internet 262.50 0 262.50 For Internet Numbers Ltd: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Numbers Ltd Supplier Payment: Bab Steering Rancho 453412 07/31/2025 Bab Steering Hydraulics Inc 0 3,199.31 3,199.31 Hydraulics Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: Rancho 453478 07/31/2025 Shred Pros 0 138.00 138.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr Rancho 453453 07/31/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply 0 58.60 58.60 Supply Company: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Company Protection District Supplier Payment:Alta Rancho Pet& City of Rancho 453406 07/31/2025 Alta Rancho Pet& Bird Hospital 400.00 0 400.00 Bird Hospital: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Transtech City of Rancho 453488 07/31/2025 Transtech Engineers Inc 7,968.00 0 7,968.00 Engineers Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Maria Elena City of Rancho 453452 07/31/2025 Maria Elena Alvarez 675.00 0 675.00 Alvarez: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 51 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/33/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Parkhouse Tire Inc: City of Rancho 453463 07/31/2025 Parkhouse Tire Inc 6,975.19 0 6,975.19 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Counts Unlimited: City of Rancho 453426 07/31/2025 Counts Unlimited 810.00 0 810.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rio Hondo Rancho 453470 07/31/2025 Rio Hondo Community College 0 237.10 237.10 Community College District: Cucamonga Fire District 07/31/2025 Protection District Supplier Payment: Dependable Break City of Rancho 453434 07/31/2025 Dependable Break Room 69.05 0 69.05 Room Solutions Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Solutions Inc Supplier Payment: Ocean Pacific City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Ocean Pacific Energy 1,499.40 0 1,499.40 Energy Company, LLC: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Company, LLC Supplier Payment: Odp Business Rancho 453461 07/31/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 236.97 236.97 Solutions Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Creative Brain City of Rancho 453430 07/31/2025 Creative Brain Learning Llc 504.00 0 504.00 Learning Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Sycamore Villa City of Rancho 453486 07/31/2025 Sycamore Villa Mobile Home 200.00 0 200.00 Mobile Home Park: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Park Supplier Payment: Red Wing Business City of Rancho 453468 07/31/2025 Red Wing Business Advantage 1,420.00 0 1,420.00 Advantage Account: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Account Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Rancho 453474 07/31/2025 San Bernardino County 0 13,159.36 13,159.36 County: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Diamond City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Diamond Environmental 515.60 0 515.60 Environmental Services: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Inland Library City of Rancho 453444 07/31/2025 Inland Library System 1,906.00 0 1,906.00 System: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: United Pumping City of Rancho 453490 07/31/2025 United Pumping Service, Inc. 8,746.40 0 8,746.40 Service, Inc.: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Standard Insurance City of Rancho 453485 07/31/2025 Standard Insurance Company 23,350.85 0 23,350.85 Company: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Odp Business City of Rancho 453460 07/31/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 2,811.05 0 2,811.05 Solutions Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 1,314.55 0 1,314.55 Printing Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Electrical Power City of Rancho 453437 07/31/2025 Electrical Power Systems Inc 5,325.00 0 5,325.00 Systems Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 9,184.00 0 9,184.00 Gershon: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 52 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/34/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Verizon Wireless- City of Rancho 453495 07/31/2025 Verizon Wireless- La 6,369.49 0 6,369.49 La: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn & City of Rancho 453447 07/31/2025 Kimley-Horn &Associates Inc 2,650.00 0 2,650.00 Associates Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 4,012.80 0 4,012.80 Academy: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart City of Rancho 453456 07/31/2025 Mrc Smart Technology 1,233.74 0 1,233.74 Technology Solutions: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Solutions Supplier Payment: David Taussig& City of Rancho 453433 07/31/2025 David Taussig&Associates Inc 315.00 0 315.00 Associates Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brightly Software City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Brightly Software Inc 15,201.00 0 15,201.00 Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Animal Care City of Rancho 453410 07/31/2025 Animal Care Equipment& 1,192.76 0 1,192.76 Equipment&Services: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Lip: City of Rancho 453450 07/31/2025 Lozano Smith Lip 3,116.53 0 3,116.53 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Christopher City of Rancho 453421 07/31/2025 Christopher Pellitteri 210.00 0 210.00 Pellitteri: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Express Brake City of Rancho 453438 07/31/2025 Express Brake Supply Inc 69.89 0 69.89 Supply Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rialto Power Rancho 453469 07/31/2025 Rialto Power Equipment Co 0 256.42 256.42 Equipment Co: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Chaparral Heights City of Rancho 453418 07/31/2025 Chaparral Heights Mobile Home 100.00 0 100.00 Mobile Home Park: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Park Supplier Payment: Bryan Cave City of Rancho 453415 07/31/2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner 1,960.00 0 1,960.00 Leighton Paisner Llp: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Up Supplier Payment: South Coast Aqmd: Rancho 453482 07/31/2025 South Coast Aqmd 0 1,302.20 1,302.20 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453484 07/31/2025 Southern California Mountains 168,342.27 0 168,342.27 Mountains Foundation: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Foundation Supplier Payment: University City of Rancho 453493 07/31/2025 University Enterprises 6,250.00 0 6,250.00 Enterprises Corporation: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Corporation Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: City of Rancho 453422 07/31/2025 Cintas Corporation 3,552.29 0 3,552.29 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tirehub Llc: City of Rancho 453487 07/31/2025 Tirehub Llc 1,506.10 0 1,506.10 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Patton Sales Corp: City of Rancho 453464 07/31/2025 Patton Sales Corp 159.36 0 159.36 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 53 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/35/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Circlepoint: City of Rancho 453424 07/31/2025 Circlepoint 6,569.54 0 6,569.54 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Shawna Ginocchio: City of Rancho 453477 07/31/2025 Shawna Ginocchio 24.00 0 24.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Velocity Truck City of Rancho 453494 07/31/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 612.38 0 612.38 Centers: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Rancho 453475 07/31/2025 San Bernardino County 0 305.00 305.00 County SheriffS Dept: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire SheriffS Dept Protection District Supplier Payment: Reach Media Rancho 453467 07/31/2025 Reach Media Network 0 476.21 476.21 Network: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Personal Exposure Rancho 453465 07/31/2025 Personal Exposure Reporting 0 1,190.00 1,190.00 Reporting: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Alta Vista Mobile City of Rancho 453407 07/31/2025 Alta Vista Mobile Home Park 288.60 0 288.60 Home Park: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brightview City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Brightview Landscape Services 8,736.18 0 8,736.18 Landscape Services Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: International City of Rancho 453445 07/31/2025 International Accreditation 5,500.00 0 5,500.00 Accreditation Services: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: Ups: 07/31/2025 City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Ups 290.77 0 290.77 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Casa Volante City of Rancho 453416 07/31/2025 Casa Volante Estates 400.00 0 400.00 Estates: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Myers Tire Supply Rancho 453458 07/31/2025 Myers Tire Supply Company 0 7,787.77 7,787.77 Company: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment:Western States Rancho 453498 07/31/2025 Western States Transmissions 0 2,563.95 2,563.95 Transmissions: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Pacific 4: City of Rancho 453462 07/31/2025 Pacific 4 2,246.38 0 2,246.38 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Intervet Inc: City of Rancho 453446 07/31/2025 Intervet Inc 2,693.75 0 2,693.75 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Willdan Group: City of Rancho 453499 07/31/2025 Willdan Group 15,965.00 0 15,965.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 54 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/36/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Cps Hr Consulting: City of Rancho 453428 07/31/2025 Cps Hr Consulting 20,000.00 0 20,000.00 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Division Of The City of Rancho 453436 07/31/2025 Division Of The State Architect 5,016.20 0 5,016.20 State Architect: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: Rancho 453432 07/31/2025 C V W D 0 231.87 231.87 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Collaborative City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Collaborative Solutions Llc 6,030.00 0 6,030.00 Solutions Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Base Line Animal City of Rancho 453413 07/31/2025 Base Line Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Hospital: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rj Thomas Mfg City of Rancho 453471 07/31/2025 Rj Thomas Mfg Company Inc 4,397.31 0 4,397.31 Company Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tryfytt: 07/31/2025 City of Rancho 453489 07/31/2025 Tryfytt 2,980.60 0 2,980.60 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:American Training City of Rancho 453409 07/31/2025 American Training Resources 660.00 0 660.00 Resources Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Charter City of Rancho 453419 07/31/2025 Charter Communications 8,433.19 0 8,433.19 Communications: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: Rancho 453423 07/31/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 1,207.66 1,207.66 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: Rancho 07/31/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 1,198.53 1,198.53 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing Lp: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Dell Marketing Lp 647.66 0 647.66 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Covetrus North City of Rancho 453427 07/31/2025 Covetrus North America 265.02 0 265.02 America: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: Rancho 453440 07/31/2025 Frontier Comm 0 654.17 654.17 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453483 07/31/2025 Southern California Edison 150,000.00 0 150,000.00 Edison: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pacific Utility City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Pacific Utility Installation Inc 1,406.61 0 1,406.61 Installation Inc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Airgas Usa Llc: City of Rancho 453403 07/31/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 7,846.97 0 7,846.97 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Page 55 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/37/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: City of Rancho 07/31/2025 Napa Auto Parts 4,259.23 0 4,259.23 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Collins&Collins Llp: City of Rancho 453425 07/31/2025 Collins&Collins Up 1,040.75 0 1,040.75 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cummins Sales& Rancho 453431 07/31/2025 Cummins Sales&Service 0 2,155.29 2,155.29 Service: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: 360 Deep Cleaning Rancho 07/31/2025 360 Deep Cleaning Llc 0 18,418.81 18,418.81 Llc: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453506 07/31/2025 Southern California Edison 11,834.23 0 11,834.23 Edison: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: City of Rancho 453504 07/31/2025 Frontier Comm 2,640.01 0 2,640.01 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: MES Service Rancho 453505 07/31/2025 MES Service Company 0 14,593.08 14,593.08 Company: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus Rancho 453503 07/31/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 5,367.62 5,367.62 Solutions: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453502 07/31/2025 C V W D 131,388.44 0 131,388.44 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Convergint City of Rancho 453537 08/07/2025 Convergint Technologies Llc 11,782.82 0 11,782.82 Technologies Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Envisionware Inc: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Envisionware Inc 37,030.60 0 37,030.60 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet Nutrition City of Rancho 453554 08/07/2025 Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,471.94 0 1,471.94 Sales Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Virtual Project City of Rancho 453603 08/07/2025 Virtual Project Manager Llc 500.00 0 500.00 Manager Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Jorry Keith 1,173.00 0 1,173.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Calif City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Calif Intergovernmental Risk 3,264,566.83 0 3,264,566.83 Intergovernmental Risk Authority: Cucamonga Authority 08/07/2025 Supplier Payment: Bauer Compressors Rancho 08/07/2025 Bauer Compressors Inc 0 5,490.47 5,490.47 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Page 56 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/38/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: Rancho 453552 08/07/2025 Frontier Comm 0 181.93 181.93 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: City of Rancho 453553 08/07/2025 Govern mentjobs.Corn Inc 73,509.12 0 73,509.12 Governmentjobs.Com Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Van Scoyoc City of Rancho 453600 08/07/2025 Van Scoyoc Associates Inc 4,000.00 0 4,000.00 Associates Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County City of Rancho 453531 08/07/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial 800.00 0 800.00 Janitorial Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Level 3 City of Rancho 453564 08/07/2025 Level 3 Communications Llc 8,084.88 0 8,084.88 Communications Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ontario Pro Soccer City of Rancho 453580 08/07/2025 Ontario Pro Soccer Llc 25,000.00 0 25,000.00 Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health: City of Rancho 453574 08/07/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,209.07 0 1,209.07 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mdg Associates Inc: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Mdg Associates Inc 20,042.50 0 20,042.50 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cart Retrieval Inc: City of Rancho 453530 08/07/2025 Cart Retrieval Inc 3,474.75 0 3,474.75 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Napa Auto Parts 500.71 0 500.71 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn & City of Rancho 453560 08/07/2025 Kimley-Horn &Associates Inc 11,960.40 0 11,960.40 Associates Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Odp Business City of Rancho 453579 08/07/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 537.89 0 537.89 Solutions Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Burrtec Waste City of Rancho 453529 08/07/2025 Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 35,352.00 0 35,352.00 Industries Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tripepi Smith& City of Rancho 453597 08/07/2025 Tripepi Smith&Associates Inc 5,500.00 0 5,500.00 Associates Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 24,098.29 0 24,098.29 Company Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ginger Dollarhide: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Ginger Dollarhide 453.60 0 453.60 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Law Office of City of Rancho 453563 08/07/2025 Law Office of Brenda Diederchs 16,153.00 0 16,153.00 Brenda Diederchs: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Diamond City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Diamond Environmental 215.40 0 215.40 Environmental Services: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Services Supplier Payment: DBH Rancho City of Rancho 453543 08/07/2025 DBH Rancho Cucamonga, LLC 12,500.00 0 12,500.00 Cucamonga, LLC: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mr T'S Towing Inc: City of Rancho 453573 08/07/2025 Mr T'S Towing Inc 1,730.00 0 1,730.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Page 57 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/39/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Onward City of Rancho 453581 08/07/2025 Onward Engineering 260.00 0 260.00 Engineering: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Michael Baker City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Michael Baker International Inc 39,090.39 0 39,090.39 International Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Consolidated City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 3,340.34 0 3,340.34 Electrical Distr Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Z&K Consultants City of Rancho 453608 08/07/2025 Z&K Consultants Inc. 44,232.70 0 44,232.70 Inc.: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Aflac: 08/07/2025 City of Rancho 453522 08/07/2025 Aflac 4,438.80 0 4,438.80 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: Rancho 08/07/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 552.70 552.70 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Dawn Triche Bisek: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Dawn Triche Bisek 160.80 0 160.80 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Delta Dental City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Delta Dental Insurance 1,241.28 0 1,241.28 Insurance Company: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Company Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Shoeteria Inc 1,064.93 0 1,064.93 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:The Toll Roads City of Rancho 453595 08/07/2025 The Toll Roads Violations Dept 372.57 0 372.57 Violations Dept: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Foothill Family City of Rancho 453550 08/07/2025 Foothill Family Shelter 6,625.03 0 6,625.03 Shelter: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Eide Bailly, LLP: City of Rancho 453546 08/07/2025 Eide Bailly, LLP 44,422.88 0 44,422.88 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Employment City of Rancho 453548 08/07/2025 Employment Development Dept 1,728.00 0 1,728.00 Development Dept: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Delta Dental Of City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Delta Dental Of California 44,304.78 0 44,304.78 California: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: K-KWoodworking: Rancho 453561 08/07/2025 K-KWoodworking 0 2,290.52 2,290.52 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: South Coast Aqmd: City of Rancho 453588 08/07/2025 South Coast Aqmd 565.63 0 565.63 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Victoria Animal City of Rancho 453602 08/07/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 100.00 0 100.00 Hospital: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Auto&Rv City of Rancho 453526 08/07/2025 Auto&Rv Specialists Inc 71.57 0 71.57 Specialists Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Page 58 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/11/2 40 of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Executive Detail Rancho 453549 08/07/2025 Executive Detail Services 0 380.00 380.00 Services: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor Power City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland Llc 4.30 0 4.30 Inland Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Diane Carty: City of Rancho 453544 08/07/2025 Diane Carty 432.00 0 432.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rossi Automotive City of Rancho 453586 08/07/2025 Rossi Automotive Equipment 1,005.73 0 1,005.73 Equipment: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Newco Distributors City of Rancho 453575 08/07/2025 Newco Distributors Inc 1,386.53 0 1,386.53 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Wilson Fiallos: City of Rancho 453606 08/07/2025 Wilson Fiallos 192.00 0 192.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Alma Arocho: City of Rancho 453524 08/07/2025 Alma Arocho 604.60 0 604.60 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Verizon Wireless- City of Rancho 453601 08/07/2025 Verizon Wireless- La 3,011.88 0 3,011.88 La: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Music Tree: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Music Tree 858.00 0 858.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Ida Tyus: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Ida Tyus 1,173.00 0 1,173.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Baker&Taylor Llc: City of Rancho 453527 08/07/2025 Baker&Taylor Llc 944.11 0 944.11 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Motive Energy Llc: City of Rancho 453570 08/07/2025 Motive Energy Llc 922.01 0 922.01 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Target Solutions Rancho 453593 08/07/2025 Target Solutions Learning Llc 0 5,680.00 5,680.00 Learning Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale City of Rancho 453565 08/07/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 3,461.51 0 3,461.51 Hardware: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: Rancho 453541 08/07/2025 C V W D 0 4,012.13 4,012.13 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Unity Courier City of Rancho 453599 08/07/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 338.75 0 338.75 Service Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453590 08/07/2025 Southern California Edison 862.25 0 862.25 Edison: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino City of Rancho 08/07/2025 San Bernardino County 3,321.75 0 3,321.75 County SheriffS Dept: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga SheriffS Dept Page 59 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/41/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:Wt.Cox Information City of Rancho 453607 08/07/2025 Wt.Cox Information Services 10,275.88 0 10,275.88 Services: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Northtown Housing City of Rancho 453577 08/07/2025 Northtown Housing 6,168.30 0 6,168.30 Development Corp: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Development Corp Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Dlr Group Inc 10,440.00 0 10,440.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Covetrus North City of Rancho 453539 08/07/2025 Covetrus North America 308.53 0 308.53 America: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Vulcan Materials City of Rancho 453604 08/07/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 1,709.55 0 1,709.55 Company: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Standard Insurance City of Rancho 453591 08/07/2025 Standard Insurance Company 32,643.57 0 32,643.57 Company: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Re Astoria 2 Llc: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Re Astoria 2 Llc 77,262.36 0 77,262.36 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution City of Rancho 453556 08/07/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 730.22 0 730.22 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: City of Rancho 453567 08/07/2025 Minuteman Press 5,992.63 0 5,992.63 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Pre-Paid Legal City of Rancho 453582 08/07/2025 Pre-Paid Legal Services Inc 191.54 0 191.54 Services Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Golden State Risk City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Golden State Risk Management 146,317.00 0 146,317.00 Management Authority: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Authority Supplier Payment: Knight Leadership City of Rancho 453562 08/07/2025 Knight Leadership Solutions 500.00 0 500.00 Solutions: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Carol Jean City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Carol Jean Bourland 1,260.00 0 1,260.00 Bourland: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Karen Clark: City of Rancho 453559 08/07/2025 Karen Clark 960.00 0 960.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Grainger: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Grainger 5,126.58 0 5,126.58 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Costar Realty City of Rancho 453538 08/07/2025 Costar Realty Information Inc 1,915.80 0 1,915.80 Information Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 831.85 0 831.85 Printing Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Emergency Medical Rancho 453547 08/07/2025 Emergency Medical Services 0 75.00 75.00 Services Authority: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Authority Protection District Supplier Payment: Hampton Living: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Hampton Living 468.00 0 468.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mint Talent Group: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Mint Talent Group 6,510.00 0 6,510.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Page 60 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/42/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Monet Construction, City of Rancho 453568 08/07/2025 Monet Construction, Inc. 415,388.69 0 415,388.69 Inc.: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Montgomery City of Rancho 453569 08/07/2025 Montgomery Hardware Co 503.62 0 503.62 Hardware Co: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: Rancho 453534 08/07/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 1,398.45 1,398.45 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: City of Rancho 453551 08/07/2025 Frontier Comm 791.53 0 791.53 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Hope City of Rancho 453557 08/07/2025 Inland Valley Hope Partners 2,160.50 0 2,160.50 Partners: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Sterling Coffee City of Rancho 453592 08/07/2025 Sterling Coffee Service 1,637.92 0 1,637.92 Service: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors City of Rancho 453536 08/07/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 380.77 0 380.77 Ontario Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Champion Awards& City of Rancho 453532 08/07/2025 Champion Awards&Specialties 43.10 0 43.10 Specialties: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog City of Rancho 453585 08/07/2025 Rancho Smog Center 49.95 0 49.95 Center: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Cucamonga Valley City of Rancho 453540 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Valley Water 9,373.44 0 9,373.44 Water District: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga District Supplier Payment:Alliant Insurance City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Alliant Insurance Services Inc 16,600.85 0 16,600.85 Services Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:The Kindred City of Rancho 453594 08/07/2025 The Kindred Corporation 791.45 0 791.45 Corporation: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 286.20 0 286.20 Corporation: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart City of Rancho 453572 08/07/2025 Mrc Smart Technology 337.26 0 337.26 Technology Solutions: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Solutions Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary City of Rancho 453566 08/07/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 5,978.10 0 5,978.10 Supply Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Occupational Health City of Rancho 453578 08/07/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of 844.00 0 844.00 Centers Of Ca: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Ca Supplier Payment:Airgas Usa Llc: City of Rancho 453523 08/07/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 3,042.51 0 3,042.51 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Direct Lighting City of Rancho 453545 08/07/2025 Direct Lighting Manufacturing 818.90 0 818.90 Manufacturing: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Brainfuse, LLC: City of Rancho 453528 08/07/2025 Brainfuse, LLC 12,500.00 0 12,500.00 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Amlon Industries City of Rancho 453525 08/07/2025 Amlon Industries Inc 2,013.49 0 2,013.49 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Page 61 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/43/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment:West Coast City of Rancho 453605 08/07/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 34,352.22 0 34,352.22 Arborists Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Dapeer Rosenblit& City of Rancho 453542 08/07/2025 Dapeer Rosenblit& Litvak Up 23,392.50 0 23,392.50 Litvak Llp: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: San Bernardino City of Rancho 453587 08/07/2025 San Bernardino County Sheriffs 296.55 0 296.55 County Sheriffs Dept: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Dept Supplier Payment:Absolute Security City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Absolute Security International 8,814.96 0 8,814.96 International Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Ocean Pacific City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Ocean Pacific Energy 1,889.77 0 1,889.77 Energy Company, LLC: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Company, LLC Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group: City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Psa Print Group 269.70 0 269.70 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Uline: 08/07/2025 Rancho 453598 08/07/2025 Uline 0 1,750.52 1,750.52 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Kaiser Foundation City of Rancho 453558 08/07/2025 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 273,045.07 0 273,045.07 Health Plan Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Inc Supplier Payment: Christopher City of Rancho 453533 08/07/2025 Christopher Pellitteri 525.00 0 525.00 Pellitteri: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Nick Barbieri City of Rancho 453576 08/07/2025 Nick Barbieri Trucking Llc 1,889.51 0 1,889.51 Trucking Llc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Amazon Web City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Amazon Web Services Inc 3,363.82 0 3,363.82 Services Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Chaffey Joint Union City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Chaffey Joint Union High 1,648.92 0 1,648.92 High School District: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga School District Supplier Payment: Mariposa City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 2,904.37 0 2,904.37 Landscapes Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: South Coast Aqmd: Rancho 453589 08/07/2025 South Coast Aqmd 0 66.96 66.96 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho 453584 08/07/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Town 20,248.27 0 20,248.27 Town Square: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Square Supplier Payment: Motorola Solutions Rancho 453571 08/07/2025 Motorola Solutions Inc 0 1,522.90 1,522.90 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: City of Rancho 453535 08/07/2025 Cintas Corporation 2,545.79 0 2,545.79 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Richards Watson& City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Richards Watson &Gershon 49,856.14 0 49,856.14 Gershon: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Page 62 Council Meeting Check Register - without 09:20 AM RANCHO SOCal Gas Page/44/of 44 CUCAMONGA Rancho Check City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Payment Amount for Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Supplier Name Cucamonga Protection Reporting Transaction District Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co City of Rancho 453555 08/07/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 5,044.34 0 5,044.34 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment:Tirehub Llc: City of Rancho 453596 08/07/2025 Tirehub Llc 146.47 0 146.47 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Quadient Finance City of Rancho 453583 08/07/2025 Quadient Finance Usa Inc 5,000.00 0 5,000.00 Usa Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc: Rancho 453610 08/07/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 1,733.78 1,733.78 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum City of Rancho 08/07/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 4,543.95 0 4,543.95 Inc: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: C V W D: City of Rancho 453609 08/07/2025 C V W D 78,057.35 0 78,057.35 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Southern California City of Rancho 453611 08/07/2025 Southern California Edison 139,230.85 0 139,230.85 Edison: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Gym and Fitness Rancho 453627 08/07/2025 Gym and Fitness Inc. 0 5,117.10 5,117.10 Inc.: 08/07/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District 11,990,218.72 901,115.87 12,891,334.59 Page 63 ti NONRR � a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Melanie Morris, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $16,605.02 Dated July 07, 2025, Through August 10, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $15,435.10 and $1,169.92 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 64 Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas 09:41 AM RANCHO Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1 CUCAMONGA Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 07/07/2025 Payment Date On or Before: 08/10/2025 Rancho payment Amount Check Supplier City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Supplier Payment Company Number Check Date Name Cucamonga Protection for Reporting District Transaction Supplier Payment: Socal City of Rancho 453341 07/24/2025 Socal Gas 14,226.78 0 14,226.78 Gas: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Supplier Payment: Socal Rancho 453340 07/24/2025 Socal Gas 0 395.86 395.86 Gas: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Socal Rancho 453371 07/24/2025 Socal Gas 0 420.91 420.91 Gas: 07/24/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Socal Rancho 453480 07/31/2025 Socal Gas 0 353.15 353.15 Gas: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga Fire Protection District Supplier Payment: Socal City of Rancho 453481 07/31/2025 Socal Gas 1,208.32 0 1,208.32 Gas: 07/31/2025 Cucamonga 15,435.10 1,169.92 16,605.02 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 65 NONRR � a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of June 30, 2025. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedules as of June 30, 2025, reflect cash and investments managed by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policies as approved on June 26, 2025. ANALYSIS: The City's and District's Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council's core value of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of the City's investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the various services the city provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2025 (City) Attachment 2 — Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2025 (Fire) Page 66 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Summary RANCHO June 30, 2025 CUCAMONGA Cash Dividends Closing Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value PFM Managed Account $ 1,102,498.77 $ 396,864,119.71 PFM Cash Balance - 2,675,159.98 CAMP Pool - 115,356,095.75 State Pool - 783,706.87 Passbook/Checking Accounts - 4,563,001.96 Total $ 1,102,498.77 $ 520,242,084.27 'Indicates a pooled cash account consisting of rash-on-hand funds for both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Cash-on-hand is pooled for normal operations and then allocated at year-end for the two entities. I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted June 26, 2025. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated expenditures. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents is provided under the City's official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. Jim arrington, Treasurer Date ATTACHMENT 1 Page 67 pfm a S et Customer Service management Ha Box 11813 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813 ACCOUNT STATEMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA For the Month Ending Client Management Team Contents Tiffany Tint Cover/Disclosures Institutional Sales&Relationship Manager Summary Statement Individual Accounts Accounts included in Staiement Meredith LaBuda Sullivan Senior Portfolio Manager ar Rachael Miller Client Consultant CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Online Access https://www.pfmam.com Customer Service 1-717-232-2723 Page 68 pfm asset management Account Statement Important Disclosures For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 Mnt Disclosur This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains/losses are provided for informational 365 and dividing the result by 7.The yields quoted should not be considered a specific advice or recommendations.PFM Asset Management("PFMAM")is a division purposes only.Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine representation of the yield of the fund in the future,since the yield is not fixed. of U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc.("USBAM"),a SEC-registered investment the tax consequences of your security transactions.PFMAM does not report such Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and adviser.USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S.Bank National Association("U.S.Bank") information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the investments of a portfolio,determined by multiplying the par or principal value of and an indirect subsidiary of U.S.Bancorp.U.S.Bank is not responsible for and does accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal,state or each security or investment by its maturity(days or years),summing the not guarantee the products,services or performance of PFMAM.PFMAM maintains a other taxing authorities. products,and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio.The written disclosure statement of our background and business experience.If you would Financial Situation In order to better serve you,PFMAM should be promptly notified stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement,please contact Service of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation. statement.However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending Operations at the address below. Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients. redeemed in whole or in part before maturity,which could affect the yield represented. security has or is still able to be called. However,it does on occasion receive consent requests.In the event a consent request portfolio The securities in this portfolio,including shares of mutual funds,are not Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM,the FDIC(except for certain (normally$1.00 per share)resulting from all dividends declared during the month their instructions.PFMAM's Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting non-negotiable certificates of deposit)or any government agency.Investment in by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning Service Operations at the address below. securities involves risks,including the possible loss of the amount invested.Actual of the month.This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by Questions About an Account PFMAM's monthly statement is intended to detail our settlement values,accrued interest,and amortized cost amounts may vary for 365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month. investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns.Any YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return,based pools that are managed by PFMAM.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement's on the original cost,the annual interest receipts,maturity value and the time and executes(i.e.,settles)all investment transactions.The custodian statement is the beginning values. period from purchase date to maturity,stated as a percentage,on an annualized official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.PFMAM recognizes that Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected basis. clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank sources,but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return,based on the statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved. Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are current market value,the annual interest receipts,maturity value and the time Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate,U.S.Bancorp Investments,Inc. period remaining until maturity,stated as a percentage,on an annualized basis. due to a timing difference. which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit Industry Regulatory Authority("FINRA")and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking according to the client's specific investment policy and requirements.The funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM.Our clients Board("MSRB").You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client's custodian. retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies;implementing and enforcing 1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts.A brochure describing the FINRA consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place. Market Value Generally,PFMAM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request. of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services.There may be Key Terms and Definitions Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully.If you think your differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned, statement is wrong,missing account information,or if you need more information and the use of differing valuation sources and methods.Non-negotiable FDIC-insured plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity,plus all realized gains and about a transaction,please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt.If you have bank certificates of deposit are priced at par.Although PFMAM believes the prices to be losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity,less ratable amortization of any other concerns or questions regarding your account,or to request an updated reliable,the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities premium and all accrued expenses to the fund.Dividends are accrued daily and may copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement,please contact a member of your could have been bought or sold.Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered be paid either monthly or quarterly.The monthly earnings on this statement represent client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below. investment company or local government investment program is contained in the the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings PFM Asset Management appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement. on a quarterly basis.There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on Attn:Service Operations Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the the actual distribution date. 213 Market Street amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date Current Yield is the net change,exclusive of capital changes and income other than Harrisburg,PA 17101 until the date of the report.Discount or premium with respect to short term securities investment income,in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance)is amortized on a share over the seven-day base period including the statement date,expressed as a NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE straightline basis.Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is percentage of the value of one share(normally$1.00 per share)at the beginning of amortized using the constant yield basis. the seven-day period.This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by Page 69 Pfm asset management Account Statement Consolidated Summary Statement For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Portfolio Summary Investment Allocation Cash Dividends Closing Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent PFMAM Managed Account 1,102,498.77 396,864,119.71 Asset-Backed Security 38,071,434.63 7.36 CAMP Pool 0.00 115,356,095.75 Federal Agency Bond/ Note 3,117,221.42 0.60 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 783,706.87 Corporate Note 84,008,479.03 16.23 Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 4,563,001.96 Bank Note 4,734,227.58 0.91 Certificate of Deposit 6,954,759.17 1.34 Total $1,102,498.77 $517,566,924.29 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Se, 51,201,785.39 9.89 Municipal Bond/ Note 1,999,080.49 0.39 Corporate Note 6,711,230.85 1.30 U.S.Treasury Bond/ Note 200,065,901.15 38.66 CAMP Pool 115,356,095.75 22.29 Local Agency Investment Fund 783,706.87 0.15 Passbook/Checking Accounts 4,563,001.96 0.88 Total $517,566,924.29 100.000/0 Maturity Distribution(Fixed Income Holdings) Sector Allocation Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent Fed Agy Bond/ Passbook/Checking Note Under 30 days 121,191,262.55 23.42 Accounts --- 0.60% 31 to 60 days 0.00 0.00 Local A e 0.88°ro p o Cor orate Note 9 y 16.23/o 61 to 90 days 0.00 0.00 Investment Fund Bank Note 91 to 180 days 0.00 0.00 0.15% 0.91% 181 days to 1 year 3,334,808.68 0.64 CAMP P000l Cert of Deposit 22.29/0 1.34% 1 to 2 years 107,597,437.48 20.79 Federal Agency 2 to 3 years 83,595,662.59 16.15 Commercial 3 to 4 years 104,483,418.23 20.19 Mortgage-Backed Security 4 to 5 years 97,364,334.76 18.81 9.89% Over 5 years 0.00 0.00 Muni Bond/Note 0.39/o Total $517,566,924.29 100.000/0 US TSY Bond/Note Priv Placement 38.66% Bond Weighted Average Days to Maturity 824 1.30% PFM Asset Management Summary Page 1 Page 70 Pfm asset management Managed Account Summary Statement For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Summary-Managed Account Cash Transactions Summary- Managed Account Opening Market Value $396,437,119.27 Maturities/Calls 0.00 Maturities/Calls (384,776.59) Sale Proceeds 17,465,277.67 Principal Dispositions (14,529,156.10) Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income 860,037.51 Principal Acquisitions 13,185,740.26 Principal Payments 384,776.59 Unsettled Trades 0.00 Security Purchases (19,264,136.16) Change in Current Value 2,155,192.87 Net Cash Contribution (0.08) Reconciling Transactions 0.00 Closing Market Value $396,864,119.71 Earnings Reconciliation(Cash Basis)- Managed Account Cash Balance Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received 894,948.14 Closing Cash Balance $2,675,159.98 Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons (46,498.71) Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses 254,049.34 Total Cash Basis Earninas $1,102,498.77 Earnings Reconciliation(Accrual Basis) Total Ending Amortized Value of Securities 393,739,836.86 Ending Accrued Interest 2,618,412.10 Plus Proceeds from Sales 14,563,820.83 Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments 384,776.59 Plus Coupons/Dividends Received 860,037.51 Less Cost of New Purchases (13,201,667.15) Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities (395,184,521.54) Less Beginning Accrued Interest (2,379,805.99) Total Accrual Basis Earnings $1,400,889.21 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 1 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 71 Pfm asset management Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - _ Account Summary Sector Allocation Description Par Value Market Value Percent 0%% U.S.Treasury Bond/ Note 204,985,000.00 200,065,901.15 50.42 Bank Note Municipal Bond/ Note 1,970,000.00 1,999,080.49 0.50 1.19% Cert of Deposit Federal Agency Commercial 50,472,279.34 51,201,785.39 12.90 1.75% Mortgage-Backed Security Corporate Note Federal Agency Bond/ Note 3,110,000.00 3,117,221.42 0.79 21.17% / Corporate Note 90,795,000.00 90,719,709.88 22.86 Fed Agy BondNote Certificate of Deposit 6,890,000.00 6,954,759.17 1.75 0.79% Bank Note 4,675,000.00 4,734,227.58 1.19 Federal Agency Asset-Backed Security 37,796,402.56 38,071,434.63 9.59 Commercial Mortgage-Backed Managed Account Sub-Total 400,693,681.90 396,864,119.71 100.00% Security Accrued Interest 2,618,412.10 12.90% Total Portfolio 400,693,681.90 399,482,531.81 Muni Bond/Note 0.50% US TSY Bond/Note Priv Placement 50.42% Bond Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00 1.69% Maturity Distribution Characteristics 27.11% 26.33% 24.53% Yield to Maturity at Cost 4.19% 21.06% Yield to Maturity at Market 4.02% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1076 0.13% 0.84% 0.00% 0-6 Months 6-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years Over 5 Years PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 2 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 72 Pfm asset management Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Issuer Summary Credit Quality(S&P Ratings) Market Value Issuer of Holdings Percent A Adobe Inc 2,888,299.90 0.73 NR 5.34% American Express Co 4,709,728.26 1.19 3.82% A+ BA Credit Card Trust 3,110,064.69 0.78 BBB+ 8.31% Bank of America Corp 3,602,239.90 0.91 0.87% A ° AAA 6.87/o Bank of New York Mellon Corp 653,994.52 0.16 6.50% A-1 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG 2,749,453.20 0.69 AA- 0.25% BlackRock Inc 2,576,361.20 0.65 2.90% AA BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 1,845,474.48 0.47 0.26% Caterpillar Inc 2,148,602.36 0.54 Charles Schwab Corp 1,943,520.00 0.49 Chippewa Valley Agency Ltd 244,237.07 0.06 Cintas Corp 1,127,521.13 0.28 Cisco Systems Inc 1,659,777.48 0.42 Citigroup Inc 5'563 160.03 1.40 64.88%8% Colgate-Palmolive Cc 1,159,419.03 0.29 Comcast Corp 2,052,306.00 0.52 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA 2,293,863.75 0.58 Credit Agricole Group 3,124,979.80 0.79 Cummins Inc 190,844.93 0.05 Deere&Co 2,749,660.00 0.69 Depository Trust&Clearing Corp 3,060,348.27 0.77 Federal Home Loan Banks 3,117,221.42 0.79 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 47,954,245.67 12.08 Federal National Mortgage Association 3,247,539.72 0.82 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2,843,218.67 0.72 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv 1,608,443.51 0.41 Goldman Sachs Group Inc 2,284,495.70 0.58 Groupe BPCE 3,341,321.40 0.84 Hershey Co 4,458,389.20 1.12 Home Depot Inc 1,960,674.00 0.49 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 5,809,261.90 1.46 Honda Motor Co Ltd 2,745,065.60 0.69 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 3 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 73 Pfm asset management Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Market Value Issuer of Holdings Percent HSBC Holdings PLC 2,822,022.00 0.71 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 1,318,703.09 0.33 International Business Machines Corp 2,498,735.00 0.63 Johnson&Johnson 564,312.34 0.14 JPMorgan Chase&Co 3,500,869.45 0.88 Kubota Credit Owner Trust 2,136,409.80 0.54 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA 901,578.01 0.23 Mars Inc 901,429.38 0.23 Medallion Financial Corp 244,220.90 0.06 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 1,575,356.51 0.40 Merck&Co Inc 3,063,365.10 0.77 Meta Platforms Inc 2,545,525.00 0.64 Morgan Stanley 4,036,715.24 1.02 National Australia Bank Ltd 2,992,488.00 0.75 National Rural Utilities Cooperative A 1,677,807.78 0.42 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust 655,101.20 0.17 Northern Trust Corp 1,592,900.98 0.40 PNC Financial Services Group Inc 2,452,512.50 0.62 State of Connecticut 1,097,502.48 0.28 State Street Corp 2,535,657.69 0.64 Texas Instruments Inc 2,243,650.00 0.57 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 1,488,866.48 0.38 Toyota Motor Corp 3,391,478.68 0.85 Truist Financial Corp 3,744,901.80 0.94 United States Treasury 200,065,901.15 50.41 UnitedHealth Group Inc 1,783,395.00 0.45 Verizon Master Trust 2,801,966.31 0.71 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2,357,105.40 0.59 Walmart Inc 1,031,293.44 0.26 Wells Fargo&Co 4,734,227.58 1.19 WF Card Issuance Trust 5,053,117.87 1.27 World Omni Auto Trust 231,270.76 0.06 Total $396,864,119.71 100.000/0 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 4 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 74 pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CCF6 1,300,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/16/22 02/17/22 1,237,031.25 1.93 825.82 1,286,552.71 1,261,748.80 DTD 06/01/2021 0.750%05/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCP4 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/06/21 08/09/21 1,986,015.63 0.77 5,214.09 1,996,959.92 1,929,454.00 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCP4 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/02/21 08/03/21 2,992,031.25 0.68 7,821.13 2,998,273.36 2,894,181.00 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCP4 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/03/24 09/05/24 2,818,359.38 3.96 7,821.13 2,894,959.70 2,894,181.00 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 9128282A7 4,525,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/21/22 04/22/22 4,249,081.05 3.02 25,500.00 4,453,219.05 4,403,567.10 DTD 08/15/2016 1.500%08/15/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCZ2 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/28/22 10/31/22 878,867.19 4.27 2,199.45 961,373.03 963,242.00 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCZ2 3,900,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/18/23 05/22/23 3,542,144.53 3.81 8,577.87 3,767,007.26 3,756,643.80 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 400,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/17/21 11/18/21 397,578.13 1.25 758.15 399,347.65 385,703.20 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/01/24 11/05/24 1,884,687.50 4.18 3,790.76 1,921,716.28 1,928,516.00 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/20/22 05/23/22 2,789,648.44 2.82 5,686.14 2,936,842.66 2,892,774.00 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828U24 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/08/22 06/09/22 2,870,390.63 3.05 7,663.04 2,959,837.10 2,925,117.00 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000%11/15/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828U24 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/28/24 10/31/24 3,836,250.00 4.11 10,217.39 3,888,457.69 3,900,156.00 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000%11/15/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDK4 1,400,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/07/24 11/08/24 1,318,734.38 4.22 1,482.24 1,343,437.72 1,349,961.20 DTD 11/30/2021 1.250%11/30/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDK4 2,895,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/01/21 12/03/21 2,903,255.27 1.19 3,065.06 2,897,341.18 2,791,526.91 DTD 11/30/2021 1.250%11/30/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 5 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 75 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CD01 1,625,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/03/22 01/05/22 1,616,684.57 1.36 55.20 1,622,497.61 1,564,125.88 DTD 12/31/2021 1.250%12/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 912828YX2 3,520,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/08/23 11/10/23 3,223,412.50 4.67 167.39 3,378,299.96 3,413,576.32 DTD 12/31/2019 1.750%12/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828Z78 2,150,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/03/24 01/05/24 1,989,589.84 4.11 13,452.35 2,067,221.49 2,073,741.65 DTD 01/31/2020 1.500%01/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 645,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/02/22 06/06/22 625,398.05 2.95 5,452.21 638,210.75 629,227.82 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 1,950,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/22 08/03/22 1,911,152.34 2.72 16,483.43 1,936,073.92 1,902,316.65 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 3,400,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/05/22 07/07/22 3,313,671.88 2.84 28,740.33 3,369,549.34 3,316,859.80 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 2,850,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/24 08/02/24 2,647,271.48 4.06 10,716.54 2,716,713.94 2,727,649.50 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 4,500,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/05/23 09/08/23 4,010,097.66 4.54 16,920.86 4,265,665.31 4,306,815.00 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 2,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/04/25 02/05/25 2,199,054.69 4.27 27.440.22 2,199,229.99 2,216,585.80 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828X88 3,300,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/22/22 08/24/22 3,179,214.84 3.22 10,009.85 3,252,176.08 3,218,014.80 DTD 05/15/2017 2.375%05/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CF132 1,600,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/04/23 01/06/23 1,522,000.00 3.93 18,353.59 1,564,439.11 1,568,625.60 DTD 08/01/2022 2.750%07/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAH4 1,175,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/03/24 09/05/24 1,066,771.48 3.79 1,963.65 1,095,342.59 1,096,789.65 DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAH4 1,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/04/24 09/05/24 1,093,781.25 3.66 2,005.43 1,121,860.80 1,120,125.60 DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFM8 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/03/23 05/08/23 3,081,093.75 3.46 31,106.56 3,041,455.77 3,026,952.00 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 6 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 76 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/02/24 12/05/24 1,800,937.50 4.18 1,684.78 1,838,312.07 1,857,266.00 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CAU5 3,050,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/04/23 01/06/23 2,597,503.91 0.00 2,569.29 2,830,826.23 2,832,330.65 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CLX7 800,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/26/24 12/31/24 795,031.25 4.36 4,214.67 795,854.20 807,312.80 DTD 11/15/2024 4.125%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 9128283F5 3,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/25/23 01/30/23 3,013,625.00 3.58 9,195.65 3,107,664.50 3,094,000.00 DTD 11/15/2017 2.250%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGC9 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/06/23 03/08/23 2,459,667.97 4.25 263.25 2,479,065.87 2,510,450.00 DTD 01/03/2023 3.875%12/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGC9 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/03/24 06/05/24 2,446,093.75 4.54 263.25 2,461,378.92 2,510,450.00 DTD 01/03/2023 3.875%12/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282C1339 3,100,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/03/23 11/06/23 2,637,785.16 4.67 9,698.20 2,817,950.35 2,875,612.70 DTD 02/01/2021 0.750%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGH8 4,550,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/03/24 01/05/24 4,459,355.47 4.04 66,427.49 4,492,455.66 4,526,362.75 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/B 9128283W8 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/06/23 03/08/23 1,869,296.88 4.23 20.662.98 1,930,557.18 1,951,954.00 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/05/23 04/06/23 2,921,015.63 3.34 30,994.48 2,957,350.22 2,927,931.00 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 3,375,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/09/23 11/10/23 3,137,299.80 4.59 34,868.78 3,228,687.75 3,293,922.38 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 1,700,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/05/23 07/07/23 1,482,984.38 4.26 5,341.53 1,573,982.83 1,591,558.70 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 2,625,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/02/23 10/04/23 2,257,089.84 4.75 8,247.95 2,399,767.19 2,457,553.88 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGT2 2,950,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/03/25 03/05/25 2,916,812.50 4.02 26,880.46 2,920,126.13 2,944,468.75 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 7 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 77 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CBZ3 3,900,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/01/23 06/05/23 3,463,687.50 3.77 8,213.32 3,648,103.22 3,644,366.70 DTD 04/30/2021 1.250%04/30/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCE9 325,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/07/23 07/11/23 281.010.74 4.35 344.09 298,769.00 303,138.55 DTD 06/01/2021 1.250%05/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCH2 3,375,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/03/23 11/06/23 2,898,676.76 4.66 114.64 3,067,830.42 3,141,649.13 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282OA0 6,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/04/23 12/05/23 6,093,046.88 4.26 69,754.10 6,064,768.25 6,165,468.00 DTD 10/02/2023 4.625%09/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128201`9 7,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/01/24 04/03/24 7,143,828.13 4.37 57,493.21 7,107,510.12 7,251,013.00 DTD 10/31/2023 4.875%10/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128285M8 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/04/24 03/06/24 7,621,562.50 4.25 31,929.35 7,727,922.19 7,850,000.00 DTD 11/15/2018 3.125%11/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJR3 4,800,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/01/24 07/02/24 4,660,875.00 4.47 489.13 4,689,414.69 4,803,000.00 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 2,100,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/03/24 06/05/24 1,864,324.22 4.45 15,329.42 1,914,363.87 1,961,696.10 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDW8 4,500.000.00 AA+ Aal 02/01/24 02/05/24 4,080.585.94 3.82 32.848.76 4,198,445.43 4,203.634.50 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 9128286131 5,725,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/02/24 05/06/24 5,240,611.33 4.62 56,459.25 5,348,051.39 5,512,550.98 DTD 02/15/2019 2.625%02/15/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEE7 6,300,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/03/24 06/05/24 5,742,105.47 4.44 37,610.66 5,856,137.27 6,001,978.50 DTD 03/31/2022 2.375%03/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 2,750,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/24 08/02/24 2,632,050.78 3.87 13,320.31 2,653,119.05 2,665,781.25 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/24 08/02/24 3,827,031.25 3.88 19,375.00 3,857,921.66 3,877,500.00 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEV9 2,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/03/24 09/05/24 2,150,929.69 3.76 194.29 2,158,676.92 2,159,524.40 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 8 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 78 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CEV9 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/04/24 09/05/24 4,916,796.88 3.63 441.58 4,929,967.62 4,908,010.00 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/04/24 11/05/24 935.156.25 4.15 10,949.59 943,369.87 957,734.00 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFCO 1,100,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/01/24 10/03/24 1,057,074.22 3.51 12,044.54 1,063,225.05 1,053,507.40 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFCO 3,400,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/30/25 06/04/25 3,231,992.19 3.92 37,228.59 3,234,769.71 3,256,295.60 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFLO 1,100,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/01/24 11/05/24 1,084,789.06 4.19 10,714.48 1,086,645.54 1,104,898.30 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFLO 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/28/24 10/31/24 1,977,968.75 4.12 19,480.87 1,980,708.69 2,008,906.00 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFT3 2,725,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/02/24 12/05/24 2,707,968.75 4.14 18,364.13 2,709,792.92 2,750,653.15 DTD 10/31/2022 4.000%10/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CMDO 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/03/25 02/06/25 2,004,531.25 4.32 237.77 2,004,201.40 2,049,218.00 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/02/25 01/07/25 2,501,757.81 4.36 297.21 2,501,607.54 2,561,522.50 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CG34 6,500,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/03/25 03/05/25 6,336,484.38 4.07 94,896.41 6,346,377.32 6,423,066.00 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2030 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGS4 2,300,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/11/25 04/15/25 2,244,027.34 4.17 20,957.65 2,246,195.16 2,283,288.20 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/13 91282CMU2 4,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/01/25 04/02/25 4,214,601.56 3.92 42,229.51 4,213,957.01 4,238,228.40 DTD 03/31/2025 4.000%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/13 91282CHF1 4,300,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/11/25 06/12/25 4,241,714.84 4.05 13,657.79 4,242,278.56 4,289,920.80 DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 204,985,000.00 195,132,957.47 3.81 1,119,778.29 198,902,170.94 200,065,901.15 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 9 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 79 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Municipal Bond/ Note LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-13 544647KY5 890,000.00 NR Aa2 04/24/25 05/13/25 890,000.00 4.42 5,248.63 890,000.00 901,578.01 DTD 05/13/2025 4.423%07/01/2028 CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL 20772KZK8 1,080,000.00 AA- Aa3 04/23/25 05/07/25 1,080,000.00 4.49 7,272.18 1,080,000.00 1,097,502.48 DTD 05/07/2025 4.489%03/15/2029 Security Type Sub-Total 1,970,000.00 1,970,000.00 4.46 12,520.81 1,970,000.00 1,999,080.49 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 1,710,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 1,624,500.00 5.03 4,863.53 1,672,047.38 1,689,139.71 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 1,960,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 1,835,739.06 4.97 5,216.87 1,894,571.73 1,924,974.80 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 3,150,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/27/23 08/01/23 3,152,707.03 4.80 12,649.88 3,151,648.16 3,206,397.60 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 FHMS K346 Al 3137HAD45 3,164,817.56 AA+ Aal 07/19/23 07/27/23 3,164,738.44 4.78 12,598.61 3,164,769.49 3,190,262.69 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 FNA 2023-M6 A2 313613ODE6 3,247,461.78 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 3,126,443.09 5.04 11,339.05 3,172,106.65 3,247,539.72 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/11/23 10/19/23 2,934,192.00 5.25 11,850.00 2,955,305.41 3,051,153.00 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 3,475,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/07/23 09/14/23 3,423,594.33 4.99 13,465.63 3,440,761.53 3,524,998.30 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 2,330,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/25/23 10/31/23 2,255,712.61 5.60 9,417.08 2,277,877.74 2,377,490.06 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 FHMS K507 A2 3137HAMS2 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/17/23 10/20/23 2,909,648.43 5.50 12.000.00 2,937,932.03 3,056,850.00 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800%09/01/2028 FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 1,130,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/14/23 11/21/23 1,126,733.17 5.14 4,773.31 1,127,709.24 1,160,200.38 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 FHMS K511 A2 3137H133G7 1,720,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/28/23 12/07/23 1,715,058.44 4.93 6,966.00 1,716,511.64 1,757,320.56 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 10 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 80 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 1,790,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/01/24 02/08/24 1,807,898.21 4.34 6,819.90 1,803,176.73 1,812,958.54 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/01/24 07/05/24 4,038,281.25 4.95 17,266.67 4,031,016.62 4,133,076.00 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 1,305,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/04/24 09/12/24 1,331,073.90 4.06 4,902.45 1,327,137.93 1,320,941.88 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 2,650,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/13/24 08/22/24 2,696,306.10 4.23 10,198.08 2,688,946.86 2,692,847.85 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 3,345,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/07/24 08/15/24 3,376,289.13 4.33 12,663.61 3,371,233.31 3,388,822.85 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 2,355,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/08/24 10/16/24 2,402,069.39 4.34 9,402.34 2,395,950.69 2,409,266.27 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 FHMS K530 A2 3137HHJL6 3,730,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/19/24 11/27/24 3,749,422.11 4.67 14,895.13 3,747,539.70 3,816,364.42 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKX38 1,325,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/15/25 04/24/25 1,324,953.63 4.41 4,869.38 1,324,956.08 1,336,767.32 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 2,085,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/11/25 03/20/25 2,084,977.07 4.43 7,697.13 2,084,982.45 2,104,413.44 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 50,472,279.34 50,080,337.39 4.82 193,854.65 50,286,181.37 51,201,785.39 Federal Agency Bond / Note FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 3,110,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/12/25 06/13/25 3,105,863.70 3.95 6,025.63 3,105,968.46 3,117,221.42 DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 3,110,000.00 3,105,863.70 3.95 6,025.63 3,105,968.46 3,117,221.42 Corporate TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 1,105,000.00 A+ Al 09/08/21 09/13/21 1,102,546.90 1.17 448.91 1,104,503.66 1,072,374.88 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 11 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 81 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate MORGAN STANLEY 6176113R8 1,000,000.00 A- Al 11/01/21 11/03/21 1,062,320.00 1.75 13,368.06 1,014,117.09 987,461.00 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 MORGAN STANLEY 6176133R8 1,000,000.00 A- Al 07/05/23 07/07/23 936.280.00 5.41 13.368.06 977,640.07 987,461.00 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477CD3 1,900,000.00 A Aa3 08/01/23 08/03/23 1,901,064.00 5.25 41,180.18 1,900,366.83 1,919,539.60 DTD 08/03/2023 5.272%08/03/2026 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WDZ1 2,000,000.00 A- A3 12/01/21 12/03/21 1,970,740.00 1.62 8,088.89 1,992,702.05 1,928,948.00 DTD 09/09/2021 1.300%09/09/2026 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913R209 2,000,000.00 A A2 12/01/21 12/03/21 1,967,640.00 1.50 6,836.11 1,991,858.29 1,932,012.00 DTD 09/14/2021 1.150%09/14/2026 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46625HRV4 1,000,000.00 A Al 11/01/21 11/03/21 1,057,540.00 1.72 7,375.00 1,014,645.36 985,430.00 DTD 07/21/2016 2.950%10/01/2026 CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) 172967KY6 1,200,000.00 BBB+ A3 08/07/23 08/10/23 1,124,628.00 5.36 7,466.67 1,169,222.55 1,183,209.60 DTD 10/21/2016 3.200%10/21/2026 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFK3 770,000.00 A- A2 10/30/23 11/02/23 769,730.50 5.61 5,749.33 769,873.18 782,912.90 DTD 11/02/2023 5.600%11/13/2026 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EWA3 2,000,000.00 A Al 01/11/22 01/13/22 1,988,720.00 1.82 16,055.56 1,996,549.50 1,930,204.00 DTD 01/10/2022 1.700%01/11/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GLE7 2,000,000.00 A- Al 07/05/23 07/07/23 1,968,420.00 5.58 45,437.78 1,986,132.58 2,005,802.00 DTD 01/20/2023 5.080%01/20/2027 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 38141GWB6 2,300,000.00 BBB+ A2 09/02/22 09/07/22 2,228,539.00 4.64 38,125.69 2,274,429.72 2,284,495.70 DTD 01/26/2017 3.850%01/26/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAD4 2,100,000.00 A- Baal 03/24/22 03/28/22 1,949,808.00 2.83 8,795.09 2,049,117.59 2,053,006.20 DTD 03/02/2021 1.267%03/02/2027 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE) 808513BYO 2,000,000.00 A- A2 04/27/22 04/29/22 1,898,200.00 3.60 16,061.11 1,964,860.32 1,943,520.00 DTD 03/03/2022 2.450%03/03/2027 HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) 437076CNO 2,000,000.00 A A2 05/06/22 05/10/22 1,936,100.00 3.59 12,138.89 1,976,816.00 1,960,674.00 DTD 03/28/2022 2.875%04/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 12 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 82 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61772BAB9 500,000.00 A- Al 06/08/22 06/10/22 452,825.00 3.72 1,261.13 482,269.26 487,788.50 DTD 04/22/2021 1.593%05/04/2027 NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE) 665859AW4 1,595,000.00 A+ A2 05/10/22 05/12/22 1,610,407.70 3.79 9.038.33 1,600,568.73 1,592,900.98 DTD 05/10/2022 4.000%05/10/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 400,000.00 A+ A2 05/17/22 05/20/22 399,784.00 3.71 1,891.11 399,918.89 396,310.00 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 1,400,000.00 A+ A2 06/02/22 06/06/22 1,412,488.00 3.50 6,618.89 1,404,598.21 1,387,085.00 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE) 693475AT2 2,500,000.00 A- A3 08/04/22 08/08/22 2,461,500.00 3.50 9,187.50 2,484,832.66 2,452,512.50 DTD 05/19/2017 3.150%05/19/2027 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 3,000,000.00 AA- Aa2 06/09/22 06/13/22 2,973,990.00 4.10 7,159.17 2,989,891.43 2,992,488.00 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GJS9 1,100,000.00 A- Al 08/07/23 08/10/23 986,150.00 4.63 8,424.35 1,040,673.10 1,069,092.20 DTD 04/22/2021 1.734%07/22/2027 IBM CORP (CALLABLE) 459200KT7 2,500,000.00 A- A3 08/01/22 08/03/22 2,561,055.00 3.61 44,381.94 2,524,781.96 2,498,735.00 DTD 07/27/2022 4.150%07/27/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 300,000.00 A- Baal 08/22/22 08/24/22 260,685.00 4.08 1,387.50 283,381.18 281,982.60 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 1,500,000.00 A- Baal 10/27/22 10/31/22 1,226,295.00 5.54 6,937.50 1,379,774.44 1,409,913.00 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TKJ3 2,300,000.00 A+ Al 10/04/22 10/06/22 2,275,459.00 4.79 29,360.14 2,289,008.82 2,319,103.80 DTD 09/20/2022 4.550%09/20/2027 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE) 882508BC7 2,300,000.00 A+ Aa3 12/07/22 12/09/22 2,158,734.00 4.30 10,746.11 2,232,570.31 2,243,650.00 DTD 11/03/2017 2.900%11/03/2027 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) 20030NEA5 2,000,000.00 A- A3 01/25/23 01/30/23 2,085,520.00 4.35 13,672.22 2,041,574.32 2,052,306.00 DTD 11/07/2022 5.350%11/15/2027 JOHNSON&JOHNSON (CALLABLE) 478160DH4 555,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/18/25 02/20/25 554,678.10 4.57 9,189.10 554,714.78 564,312.34 DTD 02/20/2025 4.550%03/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 13 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 83 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61747YFP5 1,540,000.00 A- Al 05/02/24 05/06/24 1,548,100.40 5.50 18,858.84 1,545,069.64 1,574,004.74 DTD 04/19/2024 5.652%04/13/2028 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEE2 1,075,000.00 A Al 05/02/24 05/06/24 1,078,128.25 5.49 11.478.58 1,076,968.26 1,097,203.05 DTD 04/22/2024 5.571%04/22/2028 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 (CALLABLE) 17252MAR1 1,125,000.00 A- A3 04/28/25 05/02/25 1,123,560.00 4.25 7,743.75 1,123,635.61 1,127,521.13 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2028 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BHO 2,400,000.00 A Al 05/04/23 05/08/23 2,423,880.00 4.03 16,150.00 2,413,427.43 2,418,979.20 DTD 05/04/2023 4.250%05/04/2028 CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE) 231021AY2 190,000.00 A A2 05/06/25 05/09/25 189,867.00 4.28 1,166.39 189,873.12 190,844.93 DTD 05/09/2025 4.250%05/09/2028 META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE) 30303M8L9 2,500,000.00 AA- Aa3 06/01/23 06/05/23 2,504,650.00 4.56 14,694.44 2,502,701.18 2,545,525.00 DTD 05/03/2023 4.600%05/15/2028 MERCK&CO INC (CALLABLE) 58933YBH7 3,050,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/18/23 05/22/23 3,027,826.50 4.21 15,097.50 3,037,202.37 3,063,365.10 DTD 05/17/2023 4.050%05/17/2028 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 580,000.00 A- A2 05/27/25 06/03/25 579,727.40 4.67 2,097.67 579,735.17 584,561.70 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 2,220,000.00 A- A2 05/28/25 06/03/25 2,220,177.60 4.65 8,029.00 2,220,173.99 2,237,460.30 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WEM9 800,000.00 A- A3 07/07/23 07/11/23 796,384.00 5.23 19,816.67 797,813.49 816,117.60 DTD 07/07/2023 5.125%07/07/2028 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EXBO 800,000.00 A Al 08/07/23 08/10/23 805,360.00 4.79 18,370.00 803,302.41 819,456.00 DTD 07/14/2023 4.950%07/14/2028 BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE) 05565ECE3 2,700,000.00 A A2 08/14/23 08/17/23 2,669,598.00 5.31 53,025.00 2,681,019.93 2,749,453.20 DTD 08/11/2023 5.050%08/11/2028 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 3,400,000.00 A+ Aa3 10/02/23 10/04/23 3,383,136.00 5.92 50,421.62 3,388,487.25 3,554,574.20 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803%09/29/2028 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY 21688ABC5 2,250,000.00 A+ Aa2 01/10/24 01/12/24 2,253,150.00 4.77 51,600.00 2,252,301.94 2,293,863.75 DTD 01/09/2024 4.800%01/09/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 14 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 84 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEU6 1,400,000.00 A Al 01/16/25 01/24/25 1,400,000.00 4.92 30,008.81 1,400,000.00 1,418,236.40 DTD 01/24/2025 4.915%01/24/2029 CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE) 17275RBR2 1,620,000.00 AA- Al 02/21/24 02/26/24 1,619,433.00 4.86 27.281.25 1,619,576.46 1,659,777.48 DTD 02/26/2024 4.850%02/26/2029 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE) 06405LAH4 645,000.00 AA- Aa2 04/14/25 04/22/25 645,000.00 4.73 5,846.23 645,000.00 653,994.52 DTD 04/22/2025 4.729%04/20/2029 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913UA03 215,000.00 A A2 08/12/24 08/16/24 214,417.35 4.44 3,527.34 214,510.66 216,590.36 DTD 08/16/2024 4.375%08/16/2029 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) 00724PA18 2,795,000.00 A+ Al 01/14/25 01/17/25 2,790,723.65 4.98 63,027.25 2,791,077.11 2,888,299.90 DTD 01/17/2025 4.950%01/17/2030 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFX5 875,000.00 NR A2 02/04/25 02/07/25 873,661.25 4.98 17,325.00 873,758.64 894,894.88 DTD 02/07/2025 4.950%02/07/2030 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BL1 2,000,000.00 A Al 02/24/25 02/25/25 2,006,140.00 4.68 33,513.89 2,005,750.23 2,039,410.00 DTD 02/24/2025 4.750%02/24/2030 MARS INC (CALLABLE) 571676AY1 890,000.00 A A2 03/05/25 03/12/25 889,038.80 4.83 12,934.67 889,091.34 901,429.38 DTD 03/12/2025 4.800%03/01/2030 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477DB6 605,000.00 A Aa3 04/22/25 04/24/25 605,000.00 4.83 5,442.95 605.000.00 616,118.09 DTD 04/24/2025 4.834%04/24/2030 WALMART INC (CALLABLE) 931142FN8 1,020,000.00 AA Aa2 04/23/25 04/28/25 1,018,235.40 4.39 7,764.75 1,018,291.83 1,031,293.44 DTD 04/28/2025 4.350%04/28/2030 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 2,800,000.00 AA- Aa3 06/26/25 06/27/25 2,568,216.00 4.31 11,386.67 2,568,707.20 2,576,361.20 DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE) 194162ATO 1,155,000.00 A+ Aa3 04/28/25 05/02/25 1,154,387.85 4.21 7,950.25 1,154,409.70 1,159,419.03 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2030 NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE) 637639AO8 3,010,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/13/25 05/20/25 3,008,133.80 4.71 16,111.86 3,008,180.24 3,060,348.27 DTD 05/20/2025 4.700%05/20/2030 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBP2 810,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/21/25 05/29/25 810,000.00 4.91 3,538.08 810,000.00 825,376.23 DTD 05/29/2025 4.914%05/29/2030 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 15 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 85 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending 3une 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type Sub-Total 90,795,000.00 89,487,779.45 4.28 933,958.78 90,106,458.08 90,719,709.88 DepositCertificate of CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 169894AT9 245,000.00 NR NR 07/29/20 07/29/20 245,000.00 0.50 6.71 245,000.00 244,237.07 DTD 07/29/2020 0.500%07/29/2025 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NR NR 07/30/20 07/30/20 245,000.00 0.55 3.69 245,000.00 244,220.90 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 63873TBC1 1,000,000.00 A-1 P-1 02/14/25 02/18/25 1,000,000.00 4.51 16,661.94 1,000,000.00 1,000,685.00 DTD 02/18/2025 4.510%02/13/2026 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 638730P65 2,300,000.00 A+ Al 09/18/23 09/20/23 2,300,000.00 5.61 102,507.17 2,300,000.00 2,340,636.40 DTD 09/20/2023 5.610%09/18/2026 CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY 22536DWD6 3,100,000.00 A+ Al 02/01/24 02/05/24 3,100,000.00 4.76 59,843.78 3,100,000.00 3,124,979.80 DTD 02/05/2024 4.760%02/01/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 6,890,000.00 6,890,000.00 4.71 179,023.29 6,890,000.00 6,954,759.17 WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) 9498816D4 4,675,000.00 A+ Aa2 08/03/23 08/09/23 4,672,195.00 5.47 101,915.00 4,673,969.59 4,734,227.58 DTD 08/09/2023 5.450%08/07/2026 Security Type Sub-Total 4,675,000.00 4,672,195.00 5.47 101,915.00 4,673,969.59 4,734,227.58 Asset-Backed Security HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 97,873.23 AAA NR 03/09/22 03/16/22 97,869.47 2.22 96.57 97,872.17 97,709.49 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 17,550.08 AAA NR 01/11/22 01/19/22 17,548.56 1.26 9.21 17,549.65 17,525.14 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 1,664,838.84 NR Aaa 08/09/24 08/21/24 1,664,708.49 4.89 2,261.41 1,664,752.35 1,667,029.77 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RAB2 231,140.40 AAA NR 02/06/24 02/14/24 231,122.30 5.05 518.78 231,130.14 231,270.76 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 16 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 86 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Asset-Backed Security NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 650,000.00 NR Aaa 10/18/23 10/25/23 649,868.05 5.94 1,713.11 649,915.71 655,101.20 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 395,000.00 NR Aaa 11/01/23 11/08/23 394.930.44 5.67 622.13 394,953.65 399,194.50 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 2,100,000.00 NR Aaa 02/11/25 02/12/25 2,124,363.28 4.92 4,909.33 2,122,065.73 2,136,409.80 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 TAOT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 1,475,000.00 AAA NR 07/23/24 07/30/24 1,474,999.12 4.88 3,199.11 1,475,000.00 1,488,866.48 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 1,215,000.00 AAA NR 10/08/24 10/16/24 1,214,911.06 4.41 2,381.40 1,214,926.60 1,220,993.60 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 3,000,000.00 AAA Aaa 01/30/25 01/31/25 2,987,578.13 4.44 5,773.33 2,988,694.46 3,006,672.00 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 BACCT 2024-A1 A 05522RD34 3,065,000.00 AAA Aaa 06/06/24 06/13/24 3,064,828.05 4.93 6,715.76 3,064,870.59 3,110,064.69 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 2,095,000.00 AAA NR 07/16/24 07/23/24 2,094,904.89 4.65 4,329.67 2,094,922.99 2,119,360.66 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 975,000.00 AAA Aaa 10/08/24 10/16/24 974.812.22 4.40 1,787.50 974,838.45 977,713.43 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 2,340,000.00 NR Aaa 03/18/25 03/25/25 2,339,920.44 4.50 3,217.50 2,339,929.47 2,357,105.40 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 1,830,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/04/25 02/12/25 1,829,819.75 4.56 1,390.80 1,829,838.25 1,845,474.48 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 735,000.00 NR Aaa 04/29/25 05/08/25 734,917.90 4.15 1,355.67 734,922.16 736,365.63 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 1,750,000.00 AAA Aaa 10/17/24 10/24/24 1,749,739.95 4.29 3,336.67 1,749,774.15 1,758,001.00 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 2,835,000.00 AAA Aaa 03/18/25 03/25/25 2,834,724.44 4.45 5,607.00 2,834,745.85 2,843,218.67 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 17 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 87 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Asset-Backed Security BAAT 2025-1A A3 05594BAD8 525,000.00 NR Aaa 05/06/25 05/12/25 524,963.78 4.35 697.81 524,966.51 527,345.70 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 1,555,000.00 NR Aaa 01/14/25 01/23/25 1,554,669.25 4.78 3,303.51 1,554,700.70 1,575,356.51 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 VZMT 2025-3 AlA 92348KDY6 2,790,000.00 NR Aaa 03/25/25 03/31/25 2,789,880.03 4.51 3,844.78 2,789,893.44 2,801,966.31 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 AMXCA 2025-2 A 025823KP4 2,575,000.00 AAA NR 05/06/25 05/13/25 2,574,953.39 4.28 4,898.22 2,574,955.47 2,590,367.60 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 610,000.00 AAA Aaa 05/06/25 05/14/25 609,910.21 4.28 1,087.83 609,912.94 613,204.94 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 WFCIT 2025-Al A 92970OA34 3,270,000.00 AAA NR 06/03/25 06/10/25 3,269,945.72 4.34 8,278.55 3,269,956.99 3,295,116.87 DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 37,796,402.56 37,805,888.92 4.58 71,335.65 37,805,088.42 38,071,434.63 Managed Account Sub-Total 400,693,681.90 389,145,021.93 4.16 2,618,412.10 393,739,836.86 396,864,119.71 Securities Sub-Total $400 693 681.90 $389,145 021.93 4.19% $2 618 412.10 $393,739,836.86 396,864,119.71 Accrued Interest $2,618,412.10 Total Investments 399,482,531.81 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 18 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 88 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CCF6 1,300,000.00 JPMorgan 97.06 1,261,748.80 24,717.55 (24,803.91) 0.89 4.18 DTD 06/01/2021 0.750%05/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCP4 2,000,000.00 Citigrou 96.47 1,929,454.00 (56,561.63) (67,505.92) 1.06 3.99 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCP4 3,000,000.00 Citigrou 96.47 2,894,181.00 (97,850.25) (104,092.36) 1.06 3.99 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCP4 3,000,000.00 Citigrou 96.47 2,894,181.00 75,821.62 (778.70) 1.06 3.99 DTD 08/02/2021 0.625%07/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 9128282A7 4,525,000.00 BOFAML 97.32 4,403,567.10 154,486.05 (49,651.95) 1.09 3.96 DTD 08/15/2016 1.500%08/15/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCZ2 1,000,000.00 Citigrou 96.32 963,242.00 84,374.81 1,868.97 1.22 3.92 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCZ2 3,900,000.00 BMO 96.32 3,756,643.80 214,499.27 (10,363.46) 1.22 3.92 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDG3 400,000.00 Citigrou 96.43 385,703.20 (11,874.93) (13,644.45) 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDG3 2,000,000.00 WellsFar 96.43 1,928,516.00 43,828.50 6,799.72 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 3,000,000.00 BMO 96.43 2,892,774.00 103,125.56 (44,068.66) 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828U24 3,000,000.00 BOFAML 97.50 2,925,117.00 54,726.37 (34,720.10) 1.33 3.90 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000%11/15/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828U24 4,000,000.00 Citigrou 97.50 3,900,156.00 63,906.00 11,698.31 1.33 3.90 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000%11/15/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDK4 1,400,000.00 Citigrou 96.43 1,349,961.20 31,226.82 6,523.48 1.38 3.87 DTD 11/30/2021 1.250%11/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDK4 2,895,000.00 Nomura 96.43 2,791,526.91 (111,728.36) (105,814.27) 1.38 3.87 DTD 11/30/2021 1.250%11/30/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDO1 1,625,000.00 JPMorgan 96.25 1,564,125.88 (52,558.69) (58,371.73) 1.46 3.85 DTD 12/31/2021 1.250%12/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828YX2 3,520,000.00 BMO 96.98 3,413,576.32 190,163.82 35,276.36 1.46 3.86 DTD 12/31/2019 1.750%12/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 912828Z78 2,150,000.00 BOFAML 96.45 2,073,741.65 84,151.81 6,520.16 1.53 3.84 DTD 01/31/2020 1.500%01/31/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 19 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 89 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 645,000.00 BOFAML 97.55 629,227.82 3,829.77 (8,982.93) 1.56 3.83 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 1,950,000.00 BOFAML 97.55 1,902,316.65 (8,835.69) (33,757.27) 1.56 3.83 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 3,400,000.00 Citigrou 97.55 3,316,859.80 3,187.92 (52,689.54) 1.56 3.83 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 2,850,000.00 MorganSt 95.71 2,727,649.50 80,378.02 10,935.56 1.61 3.82 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 4,500,000.00 BMO 95.71 4,306,815.00 296,717.34 41,149.69 1.61 3.82 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 2,200,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.75 2,216,585.80 17,531.11 17,355.81 1.61 3.80 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828X88 3,300,000.00 BOFAML 97.52 3,218,014.80 38,799.96 (34,161.28) 1.80 3.77 DTD 05/15/2017 2.375%05/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CF132 1,600,000.00 BMO 98.04 1,568,625.60 46,625.60 4,186.49 1.97 3.75 DTD 08/01/2022 2.750%07/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAH4 1,175,000.00 BOFAML 93.34 1,096,789.65 30,018.17 1,447.06 2.11 3.74 DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CAH4 1,200,000.00 BOFAML 93.34 1,120,125.60 26,344.35 (1,735.20) 2.11 3.74 DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFM8 3,000,000.00 Citigrou 100.90 3,026,952.00 (54,141.75) (14,503.77) 2.11 3.73 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 2,000,000.00 Citigrou 92.86 1,857,266.00 56,328.50 18,953.93 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 3,050,000.00 BOFAML 92.86 2,832,330.65 234,826.74 1,504.42 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CLX7 800,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.91 807,312.80 12,281.55 11,458.60 2.23 3.74 DTD 11/15/2024 4.125%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282831`5 3,200,000.00 Citigrou 96.69 3,094,000.00 80,375.00 (13,664.50) 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/15/2017 2.250%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGC9 2,500,000.00 BMO 100.42 2,510,450.00 50,782.03 31,384.13 2.36 3.72 DTD 01/03/2023 3.875%12/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGC9 2,500,000.00 BMO 100.42 2,510,450.00 64,356.25 49,071.08 2.36 3.72 DTD 01/03/2023 3.875%12/31/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 20 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 90 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/13 91282C1319 3,100,000.00 BMO 92.76 2,875,612.70 237,827.54 57,662.35 2.50 3.73 DTD 02/01/2021 0.750%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGH8 4,550,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.48 4,526,362.75 67,007.28 33,907.09 2.41 3.74 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 2,000,000.00 BMO 97.60 1,951,954.00 82,657.12 21,396.82 2.47 3.74 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 3,000,000.00 BMO 97.60 2,927,931.00 6,915.37 (29,419.22) 2.47 3.74 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 3,375,000.00 BMO 97.60 3,293,922.38 156,622.58 65,234.63 2.47 3.74 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 1,700,000.00 JPMorgan 93.62 1,591,558.70 108,574.32 17,575.87 2.65 3.73 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 2,625,000.00 BOFAML 93.62 2,457,553.88 200,464.04 57,786.69 2.65 3.73 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGT2 2,950,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.81 2,944,468.75 27,656.25 24,342.62 2.57 3.72 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBZ3 3,900,000.00 BMO 93.45 3,644,366.70 180,679.20 (3,736.52) 2.73 3.73 DTD 04/30/2021 1.250%04/30/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCE9 325,000.00 RBC Capi 93.27 303,138.55 22,127.81 4,369.55 2.81 3.73 DTD 06/01/2021 1.250%05/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCH2 3,375,000.00 BMO 93.09 3,141,649.13 242,972.37 73,818.71 2.89 3.73 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 912820A0 6,000,000.00 BOFAML 102.76 6,165,468.00 72,421.12 100,699.75 2.97 3.74 DTD 10/02/2023 4.625%09/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJF9 7,000,000.00 BMO 103.59 7,251,013.00 107,184.87 143,502.88 3.04 3.75 DTD 10/31/2023 4.875%10/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128285M8 8,000,000.00 BMO 98.13 7,850,000.00 228,437.50 122,077.81 3.15 3.75 DTD 11/15/2018 3.125%11/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJR3 4,800,000.00 BOFAML 100.06 4,803,000.00 142,125.00 113,585.31 3.25 3.76 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 2,100,000.00 BMO 93.41 1,961,696.10 97,371.88 47,332.23 3.39 3.76 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 4,500,000.00 Nomura 93.41 4,203,634.50 123,048.56 5,189.07 3.39 3.76 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 21 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 91 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/13 9128286131 5,725,000.00 BOFAML 96.29 5,512,550.98 271,939.65 164,499.59 3.38 3.76 DTD 02/15/2019 2.625%02/15/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEE7 6,300,000.00 Citigrou 95.27 6,001,978.50 259,873.03 145,841.23 3.51 3.77 DTD 03/31/2022 2.375%03/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 2,750,000.00 Citigrou 96.94 2,665,781.25 33,730.47 12,662.20 3.56 3.77 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 4,000,000.00 BOFAML 96.94 3,877,500.00 50,468.75 19,578.34 3.56 3.77 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEV9 2,200,000.00 BOFAML 98.16 2,159,524.40 8,594.71 847.48 3.71 3.78 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CEV9 5,000,000.00 Nomura 98.16 4,908,010.00 (8,786.88) (21,957.62) 3.71 3.78 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFCO 1,000,000.00 BMO 95.77 957,734.00 22,577.75 14,364.13 3.78 3.78 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 1,100,000.00 Nomura 95.77 1,053,507.40 (3,566.82) (9,717.65) 3.78 3.78 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 3,400,000.00 WeIlsFar 95.77 3,256,295.60 24,303.41 21,525.89 3.78 3.78 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFLO 1,100,000.00 BOFAML 100.45 1,104,898.30 20,109.24 18,252.76 3.85 3.79 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFLO 2,000,000.00 BMO 100.45 2,008,906.00 30,937.25 28,197.31 3.85 3.79 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFT3 2,725,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.94 2,750,653.15 42,684.40 40,860.23 3.93 3.80 DTD 10/31/2022 4.000%10/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CMDO 2,000,000.00 Nomura 102.46 2,049,218.00 44,686.75 45,016.60 4.06 3.81 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 2,500,000.00 MorganSt 102.46 2,561,522.50 59,764.69 59,914.96 4.06 3.81 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CG34 6,500,000.00 Citigrou 98.82 6,423,066.00 86,581.62 76,688.68 4.14 3.82 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2030 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGS4 2,300,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.27 2,283,288.20 39,260.86 37,093.04 4.29 3.83 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/13 91282CMU2 4,200,000.00 Nomura 100.91 4,238,228.40 23,626.84 24,271.39 4.25 3.82 DTD 03/31/2025 4.000%03/31/2030 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 22 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 92 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CHF1 4,300,000.00 BMO 99.77 4,289,920.80 48,205.96 47,642.24 4.44 3.84 DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 204,985,000.00 200,065,901.15 4,932,943.68 1,163,730.21 2.65 3.80 Municipal Bond I Note LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B 544647KY5 890,000.00 Raymond] 101.30 901,578.01 11,578.01 11,578.01 2.77 4.00 DTD 05/13/2025 4.423%07/01/2028 CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL 20772KZK8 1,080,000.00 Barclays 101.62 1,097,502.48 17,502.48 17,502.48 3.36 4.09 DTD 05/07/2025 4.489%03/15/2029 Security Type Sub-Total 1,970,000.00 1,999,080.49 29,080.49 29,080.49 3.10 4.05 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 1.710,000.00 Barclays 98.78 1,689,139.71 64,639.71 17,092.33 1.37 4.18 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 1.960,000.00 TD Secur 98.21 1,924,974.80 89,235.74 30,403.07 1.91 4.06 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 3.150,000.00 SAN 101.79 3,206,397.60 53,690.57 54,749.44 2.64 4.10 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 FHMS K346 Al 3137HAD45 3.164,817.56 3PMorgan 100.80 3,190,262.69 25,524.25 25,493.20 1.85 4.23 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136BODE6 3.247,461.78 3PMorgan 100.00 3,247,539.72 121,096.63 75,433.07 2.78 4.15 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 3.000,000.00 BMO 101.71 3,051,153.00 116,961.00 95,847.59 2.81 4.10 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 3.475,000.00 WellsFar 101.44 3,524,998.30 101,403.97 84,236.77 2.79 4.10 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 2.330,000.00 MorganSt 102.04 2,377,490.06 121,777.45 99,612.32 2.89 4.07 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 FHMS K507 A2 3137HAMS2 3.000,000.00 PNCBank 101.90 3,056,850.00 147,201.57 118,917.97 2.85 4.10 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800%09/01/2028 FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 1.130,000.00 3PMorgan 102.67 1,160,200.38 33,467.21 32,491.14 2.92 4.13 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 23 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 93 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 1,720,000.00 BOFAML 102.17 1,757,320.56 42,262.12 40,808.92 2.96 4.10 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 1,790,000.00 JPMorgan 101.28 1,812,958.54 5,060.33 9,781.81 3.05 4.12 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 4,000,000.00 WellsFar 103.33 4,133,076.00 94,794.75 102,059.38 3.30 4.16 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 1,305,000.00 BOFAML 101.22 1,320,941.88 (10,132.02) (6,196.05) 3.64 4.16 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 2,650,000.00 MorganSt 101.62 2,692,847.85 (3,458.25) 3,900.99 3.61 4.16 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 3,345,000.00 BMO 101.31 3,388,822.85 12,533.72 17,589.54 3.62 4.16 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 2,355,000.00 MorganSt 102.30 2,409,266.27 7,196.88 13,315.58 3.73 4.17 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 FHMS K530 A2 3137HH]L6 3,730,000.00 JPMorgan 102.32 3,816,364.42 66,942.31 68,824.72 3.75 4.17 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKX]8 1,325,000.00 JPMorgan 100.89 1,336,767.32 11,813.69 11,811.24 4.05 4.19 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 2,085,000.00 MorganSt 100.93 2,104,413.44 19,436.37 19,430.99 4.12 4.20 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 50,472,279.34 51,201,785.39 1,121,448.00 915,604.02 3.03 4.14 Federal Agency Bond I Note FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 3,110,000.00 Nomura 100.23 3,117,221.42 11,357.72 11,252.96 1.83 3.79 DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 3,110,000.00 3,117,221.42 11,357.72 11,252.96 1.83 3.79 Corporate TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236T]K2 1,105,000.00 JPMorgan 97.05 1,072,374.88 (30,172.02) (32,128.78) 0.94 4.29 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 MORGAN STANLEY 6176113R8 1.000,000.00 SUSQ 98.75 987,461.00 (74,859.00) (26,656.09) 1.03 4.37 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 24 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 94 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate MORGAN STANLEY 6176133R8 1,000,000.00 SEEL 98.75 987,461.00 51,181.00 9,820.93 1.03 4.37 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477CD3 1,900,000.00 JPMorgan 07/03/26 101.03 1,919,539.60 18,475.60 19,172.77 0.96 4.34 DTD 08/03/2023 5.272%08/03/2026 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WDZ1 2,000,000.00 RBC Capi 96.45 1,928,948.00 (41,792.00) (63,754.05) 1.16 4.40 DTD 09/09/2021 1.300%09/09/2026 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913R209 2,000,000.00 LoopCapM 96.60 1,932,012.00 (35,628.00) (59,846.29) 1.17 4.11 DTD 09/14/2021 1.150%09/14/2026 ]PMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46625HRV4 1,000,000.00 SUSQ 07/01/26 98.54 985,430.00 (72,110.00) (29,215.36) 1.15 4.19 DTD 07/21/2016 2.950%10/01/2026 CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) 172967KY6 1,200,000.00 RBS 07/21/26 98.60 1,183,209.60 58,581.60 13,987.05 1.19 4.36 DTD 10/21/2016 3.200%10/21/2026 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFK3 770,000.00 MIZU 10/13/26 101.68 782,912.90 13,182.40 13,039.72 1.23 4.35 DTD 11/02/2023 5.600%11/13/2026 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EWA3 2,000,000.00 JPMorgan 96.51 1,930,204.00 (58,516.00) (66,345.50) 1.47 4.12 DTD 01/10/2022 1.700%01/11/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GLE7 2,000,000.00 JPMorgan 01/20/26 100.29 2,005,802.00 37,382.00 19,669.42 0.53 5.28 DTD 01/20/2023 5.080%01/20/2027 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 38141GWB6 2,300,000.00 MorganSt 01/26/26 99.33 2,284,495.70 55,956.70 10,065.98 1.06 4.34 DTD 01/26/2017 3.850%01/26/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAD4 2,100,000.00 GoldmanS 03/02/26 97.76 2,053,006.20 103,198.20 3,888.61 0.66 4.89 DTD 03/02/2021 1.267%03/02/2027 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE) 808513BYO 2,000,000.00 CSFirstB 02/03/27 97.18 1,943,520.00 45,320.00 (21,340.32) 1.59 4.25 DTD 03/03/2022 2.450%03/03/2027 HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) 437076CNO 2,000,000.00 Scotiaca 03/15/27 98.03 1,960,674.00 24,574.00 (16,142.00) 1.69 4.06 DTD 03/28/2022 2.875%04/15/2027 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61772BAB9 500,000.00 BOFAML 05/04/26 97.56 487,788.50 34,963.50 5,519.24 0.82 4.96 DTD 04/22/2021 1.593%05/04/2027 NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE) 665859AW4 1,595,000.00 JPMorgan 04/10/27 99.87 1,592,900.98 (17,506.72) (7,667.75) 1.72 4.10 DTD 05/10/2022 4.000%05/10/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 400,000.00 BOFAML 04/15/27 99.08 396,310.00 (3,474.00) (3,608.89) 1.74 4.24 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 1,400,000.00 JPMorgan 04/15/27 99.08 1,387,085.00 (25,403.00) (17,513.21) 1.74 4.24 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 25 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 95 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE) 693475AT2 2,500,000.00 JANE 04/19/27 98.10 2,452,512.50 (8,987.50) (32,320.16) 1.77 4.23 DTD 05/19/2017 3.150%05/19/2027 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 3,000,000.00 JPMorgan 99.75 2,992,488.00 18,498.00 2,596.57 1.84 4.05 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GJS9 1,100,000.00 JANE 07/22/26 97.19 1,069,092.20 82,942.20 28,419.10 1.02 4.91 DTD 04/22/2021 1.734%07/22/2027 IBM CORP (CALLABLE) 459200KT7 2,500,000.00 BNPPSA 06/27/27 99.95 2,498,735.00 (62,320.00) (26,046.96) 1.89 4.21 DTD 07/27/2022 4.150%07/27/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 300,000.00 JANE 06/03/27 93.99 281,982.60 21,297.60 (1,398.58) 2.01 4.19 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 1,500,000.00 GoldmanS 06/03/27 93.99 1,409,913.00 183,618.00 30,138.56 2.01 4.19 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TKJ3 2,300,000.00 Citigrou 100.83 2,319,103.80 43,644.80 30,094.98 2.07 4.20 DTD 09/20/2022 4.550%09/20/2027 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE) 882508BC7 2,300,000.00 MorganSt 08/03/27 97.55 2,243,650.00 84,916.00 11,079.69 2.16 4.04 DTD 11/03/2017 2.900%11/03/2027 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) 20030NEA5 2,000,000.00 TD Secur 10/15/27 102.62 2,052,306.00 (33,214.00) 10,731.68 2.15 4.21 DTD 11/07/2022 5.350%11/15/2027 JOHNSON&JOHNSON (CALLABLE) 478160DH4 555,000.00 JPMorgan 02/01/28 101.68 564,312.34 9,634.24 9,597.56 2.41 3.88 DTD 02/20/2025 4.550%03/01/2028 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61747YFP5 1,540,000.00 JANE 04/13/27 102.21 1,574,004.74 25,904.34 28,935.10 1.66 4.75 DTD 04/19/2024 5.652%04/13/2028 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEE2 1,075,000.00 MAXE 04/22/27 102.07 1,097,203.05 19,074.80 20,234.79 1.70 4.73 DTD 04/22/2024 5.571%04/22/2028 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 (CALLABLE) 17252MAR1 1,125,000.00 MUFG 04/01/28 100.22 1,127,521.13 3,961.13 3,885.52 2.59 4.14 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2028 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BHO 2,400,000.00 GoldmanS 04/04/28 100.79 2,418,979.20 (4,900.80) 5,551.77 2.59 4.00 DTD 05/04/2023 4.250%05/04/2028 CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE) 231021AY2 190,000.00 JPMorgan 04/09/28 100.44 190,844.93 977.93 971.81 2.61 4.10 DTD 05/09/2025 4.250%05/09/2028 META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE) 30303M8L9 2,500,000.00 JPMorgan 04/15/28 101.82 2,545,525.00 40,875.00 42,823.82 2.61 3.96 DTD 05/03/2023 4.600%05/15/2028 MERCK&CO INC (CALLABLE) 58933YBH7 3,050,000.00 Citigrou 04/17/28 100.44 3,063,365.10 35,538.60 26,162.73 2.64 3.93 DTD 05/17/2023 4.050%05/17/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 26 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 96 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 580,000.00 HSBC 100.79 584,561.70 4,834.30 4,826.53 2.70 4.40 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 2,220,000.00 HSBC 100.79 2,237,460.30 17,282.70 17,286.31 2.70 4.40 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WEM9 800,000.00 GoldmanS 102.01 816,117.60 19,733.60 18,304.11 2.71 4.43 DTD 07/07/2023 5.125%07/07/2028 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EXBO 800,000.00 GoldmanS 102.43 819,456.00 14,096.00 16,153.59 2.74 4.13 DTD 07/14/2023 4.950%07/14/2028 BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE) 05565ECE3 2,700,000.00 Barclays 07/11/28 101.83 2,749,453.20 79,855.20 68,433.27 2.76 4.45 DTD 08/11/2023 5.050%08/11/2028 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 3,400,000.00 GoldmanS 08/29/28 104.55 3,554,574.20 171,438.20 166,086.95 2.86 4.32 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803%09/29/2028 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY 21688ABC5 2,250,000.00 MIZU 101.95 2,293,863.75 40,713.75 41,561.81 3.15 4.25 DTD 01/09/2024 4.800%01/09/2029 ]PMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEU6 1,400,000.00 JPMorgan 01/24/28 101.30 1,418,236.40 18,236.40 18,236.40 2.35 4.62 DTD 01/24/2025 4.915%01/24/2029 CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE) 17275RBR2 1,620,000.00 Citigrou 01/26/29 102.46 1,659,777.48 40,344.48 40,201.02 3.23 4.16 DTD 02/26/2024 4.850%02/26/2029 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE) 06405LAH4 645,000.00 BOFAML 04/20/28 101.39 653,994.52 8,994.52 8,994.52 2.58 4.56 DTD 04/22/2025 4.729%04/20/2029 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913UA03 215,000.00 BOFAML 100.74 216,590.36 2,173.01 2,079.70 3.68 4.21 DTD 08/16/2024 4.375%08/16/2029 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) 00724PA38 2,795,000.00 BOFAML 12/17/29 103.34 2,888,299.90 97,576.25 97,222.79 3.93 4.19 DTD 01/17/2025 4.950%01/17/2030 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFX5 875,000.00 RBC Capi 01/07/30 102.27 894,894.88 21,233.63 21,136.24 3.98 4.44 DTD 02/07/2025 4.950%02/07/2030 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BL1 2,000,000.00 TD Secur 01/24/30 101.97 2,039,410.00 33,270.00 33,659.77 4.05 4.33 DTD 02/24/2025 4.750%02/24/2030 MARS INC (CALLABLE) 571676AY1 890,000.00 BOFAML 02/01/30 101.28 901,429.38 12,390.58 12,338.04 4.06 4.53 DTD 03/12/2025 4.800%03/01/2030 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477DB6 605,000.00 MorganSt 03/24/30 101.84 616,118.09 11,118.09 11,118.09 4.20 4.44 DTD 04/24/2025 4.834%04/24/2030 WALMART INC (CALLABLE) 931142FN8 1,020,000.00 BOFAML 03/28/30 101.11 1,031,293.44 13,058.04 13,001.61 4.26 4.13 DTD 04/28/2025 4.350%04/28/2030 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 27 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 97 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 2,800,000.00 JANE 01/30/30 92.01 2,576,361.20 8,145.20 7,654.00 4.43 4.30 DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE) 194162ATO 1,155,000.00 Citigrou 04/01/30 100.38 1,159,419.03 5,031.18 5,009.33 4.28 4.15 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2030 NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE) 637639AC8 3,010,000.00 BOFAML 04/20/30 101.67 3,060,348.27 52,214.47 52,168.03 4.28 4.34 DTD 05/20/2025 4.700%05/20/2030 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBP2 810,000.00 Citigrou 04/29/30 101.90 825,376.23 15,376.23 15,376.23 4.28 4.51 DTD 05/29/2025 4.914%05/29/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 90,795,000.00 90,719,709.88 1,231,930.43 613,251.80 2.33 4.30 DepositCertificate of CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 169894AT9 245,000.00 NEW ACC 99.69 244,237.07 (762.93) (762.93) 0.08 4.64 DTD 07/29/2020 0.500%07/29/2025 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NEW ACC 99.68 244,220.90 (779.10) (779.10) 0.08 4.64 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 63873TBC1 1,000,000.00 NAT 100.07 1,000,685.00 685.00 685.00 0.61 4.32 DTD 02/18/2025 4.510%02/13/2026 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 638730P65 2,300,000.00 WellsFar 101.77 2,340,636.40 40,636.40 40,636.40 1.14 4.13 DTD 09/20/2023 5.610%09/18/2026 CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY 22536DWD6 3,100,000.00 CRAG 100.81 3,124,979.80 24,979.80 24,979.80 1.51 4.19 DTD 02/05/2024 4.760%02/01/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 6,890,000.00 6,954,759.17 64,759.17 64,759.17 1.16 4.22 WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) 9498816D4 4.675,000.00 BOFAML 07/07/26 101.27 4,734,227.58 62,032.58 60,257.99 0.97 4.29 DTD 08/09/2023 5.450%08/07/2026 Security Type Sub-Total 4,675,000.00 4,734,227.58 62,032.58 60,257.99 0.97 4.29 Asset-Backed Security HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 97,873.23 BOFAML 99.83 97,709.49 (159.98) (162.68) 0.07 4.42 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 28 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 98 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Asset-Backed Security GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 17,550.08 BNPPSA 99.86 17,525.14 (23.42) (24.51) 0.04 4.59 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 1,664,838.84 JPMorgan 100.13 1,667,029.77 2,321.28 2,277.42 0.35 4.55 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RAB2 231,140.40 MIZU 100.06 231,270.76 148.46 140.62 0.12 4.52 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 650,000.00 MIZU 100.78 655,101.20 5,233.15 5,185.49 0.63 4.67 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 395,000.00 JPMorgan 101.06 399,194.50 4,264.06 4,240.85 0.88 4.44 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 2,100,000.00 WeIlsFar 101.73 2,136,409.80 12,046.52 14,344.07 1.64 4.28 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 TAOT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 1,475,000.00 MUFG 100.94 1,488,866.48 13,867.36 13,866.48 1.30 4.19 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 1,215,000.00 Barclays 100.49 1,220,993.60 6,082.54 6,067.00 1.59 4.16 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 3,000,000.00 BOFAML 100.22 3,006,672.00 19,093.87 17,977.54 1.43 4.25 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 BACCT 2024-A1 A 05522RD34 3,065,000.00 BOFAML 101.47 3,110,064.69 45,236.64 45,194.10 1.75 4.15 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 2,095,000.00 Citigrou 101.16 2,119,360.66 24,455.77 24,437.67 1.91 4.11 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 975,000.00 MIZU 100.28 977,713.43 2,901.21 2,874.98 1.36 4.25 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 2,340,000.00 Barclays 100.73 2,357,105.40 17,184.96 17,175.93 2.00 4.19 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 1,830,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.85 1,845,474.48 15,654.73 15,636.23 1.81 4.15 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 735,000.00 JPMorgan 100.19 736,365.63 1,447.73 1,443.47 2.15 4.12 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 1,750,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.46 1,758,001.00 8,261.05 8,226.85 2.14 4.13 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 2,835,000.00 SGAS 100.29 2,843,218.67 8,494.23 8,472.82 2.04 4.37 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 29 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 99 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Asset-Backed Security BAAT 2025-1A A3 05594BAD8 525,000.00 BOFAML 100.45 527,345.70 2,381.92 2,379.19 1.96 4.18 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 1,555,000.00 SGAS 101.31 1,575,356.51 20,687.26 20,655.81 1.68 4.09 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 VZMT 2025-3 AlA 92348KDY6 2,790,000.00 BOFAML 100.43 2,801,966.31 12,086.28 12,072.87 2.13 4.40 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 AMXCA 2025-2 A 02582JKP4 2,575,000.00 RBC Capi 100.60 2,590,367.60 15,414.21 15,412.13 2.58 4.13 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 610,000.00 TD Secur 100.53 613,204.94 3,294.73 3,292.00 2.14 4.09 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 WFCIT 2025-Al A 92970OA34 3,270,000.00 WellsFar 100.77 3,295,116.87 25,171.15 25,159.88 2.65 4.12 DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 37,796,402.56 38,071,434.63 265,545.71 266,346.21 1.82 4.23 Managed Account Sub-Total 400,693,681.90 396,864,119.71 7,719,097.78 3,124,282.85 2.49 4.01 Securities Sub-Total $400,693,681.90 $396,864,119.71 $7,719,097.78 $3,124,282.85 2.50 4.02% Accrued Interest $2,618,412.10 Total Investments $399,482,531.81 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 30 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page100 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 05/27/25 06/03/25 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 580,000.00 (579,727.40) 0.00 (579,727.40) DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 05/28/25 06/03/25 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 2,220,000.00 (2,220,177.60) 0.00 (2,220,177.60) DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 05/30/25 06/04/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 3,400,000.00 (3,231,992.19) (30,571.82) (3,262,564.01) DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 06/03/25 06/10/25 WFCIT 2025-A1 A 929700AJ4 3,270,000.00 (3,269,945.72) 0.00 (3,269,945.72) DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 06/11/25 06/12/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CHF1 4,300,000.00 (4,241,714.84) (5,286.89) (4,247,001.73) DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 06/12/25 06/13/25 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 3,110,000.00 (3,105,863.70) 0.00 (3,105,863.70) DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 06/26/25 06/27/25 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 2,800,000.00 (2,568,216.00) (10,640.00) (2,578,856.00) DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 Transaction Type Sub-Total 19,680,000.00 (19,217,637.45) (46,498.71) (19,264,136.16) 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K530 A2 3137HHJL6 0.00 14,895.13 14,895.13 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 0.00 12,663.61 12,663.61 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 0.00 13,465.63 13,465.63 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 0.00 4,863.53 4,863.53 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 0.00 6,819.90 6,819.90 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 0.00 4,902.45 4,902.45 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 0.00 12,649.88 12,649.88 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 0.00 6,966.00 6,966.00 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 31 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 101 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS KJ46 Al 3137HAD45 0.00 12,609.44 12,609.44 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2 313613ODE6 0.00 11,339.75 11,339.75 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 0.00 9,417.08 9,417.08 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 0.00 9,402.34 9,402.34 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K507 A2 3137HAMS2 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800%09/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKX38 0.00 4,869.38 4,869.38 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 0.00 10,198.08 10,198.08 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 0.00 7,697.13 7,697.13 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 0.00 11,850.00 11,850.00 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 0.00 5,216.87 5,216.87 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 0.00 17,266.67 17,266.67 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 0.00 4,773.31 4,773.31 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 06/02/25 06/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 1,283.15 1,283.15 DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% -- 06/09/25 06/09/25 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 0.00 58,575.00 58,575.00 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 06/15/25 06/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 0.00 8,118.13 8,118.13 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RA132 0.00 1,288.79 1,288.79 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 06/15/25 06/15/25 TAOT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 0.00 5,998.33 5,998.33 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 32 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page102 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/15/25 06/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 0.00 3,134.98 3,134.98 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 0.00 4,465.13 4,465.13 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A 05522RDJ4 0.00 12,592.04 12,592.04 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 0.00 6,256.25 6,256.25 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 0.00 3,212.08 3,212.08 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 06/15/25 06/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 0.00 9,205.00 9,205.00 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 06/15/25 06/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 0.00 10,825.00 10,825.00 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A 02582JKP4 0.00 9,796.44 9,796.44 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 06/15/25 06/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 0.00 10,513.13 10,513.13 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 0.00 292.04 292.04 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 06/15/25 06/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 0.00 6,194.08 6,194.08 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 0.00 3,575.00 3,575.00 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 0.00 2,320.71 2,320.71 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 0.00 40.31 40.31 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 06/18/25 06/18/25 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 0.00 6,215.63 6,215.63 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 06/20/25 06/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 AIA 92348KDY6 0.00 10,485.75 10,485.75 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 06/20/25 06/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3 0559413AD8 0.00 1,903.13 1,903.13 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 33 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page103 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/20/25 06/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 0.00 8,775.00 8,775.00 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 06/21/25 06/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 0.00 1,866.38 1,866.38 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 06/21/25 06/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 0.00 7,704.86 7,704.86 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 06/25/25 06/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 0.00 6,954.00 6,954.00 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 06/29/25 06/29/25 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 169894AT9 0.00 104.04 104.04 DTD 07/29/2020 0.500%07/29/2025 06/30/25 06/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 0.00 114.45 114.45 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCH2 O.00 21,093.75 21,093.75 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CEV9 0.00 117,000.00 117,000.00 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 0.00 98,437.50 98,437.50 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGC9 0.00 96,875.00 96,875.00 DTD 01/03/2023 3.875%12/31/2027 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CJR3 0.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 912828YX2 0.00 30,800.00 30,800.00 DTD 12/31/2019 1.750%12/31/2026 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDO1 0.00 10,156.25 10,156.25 DTD 12/31/2021 1.250%12/31/2026 Transaction Type Sub-Total 0.00 860,037.51 860,037.51 06/01/25 06/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136BODE6 199.50 199.50 0.00 199.50 7.44 4.76 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K146 Al 3137HAD45 2,719.09 2,719.09 0.00 2,719.09 0.07 0.04 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 34 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page104 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/15/25, 06/15/25 HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 59,984.54 59,984.54 0.00 59,984.54 2.31 0.67 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 06/15/25 06/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RAB2 75,106.72 75,106.72 0.00 75,106.72 5.88 3.41 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 20,841.54 20,841.54 0.00 20,841.54 1.81 0.53 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 06/21/25 06/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 225,925.20 225,925.20 0.00 225,925.20 17.69 11.93 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 Transaction Type Sub-Total 384,776.59 384,776.59 0.00 384,776.59 35.20 21.34 05/30/25 06/04/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCF6 1,300,000.00 1,257,191.41 106.56 1,257,297.97 (39,964.84) (42,245.15) FIFO DTD 06/01/2021 0.750%05/31/2026 05/30/25 06/04/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCF6 1,700,000.00 1,644,019.53 139.34 1,644,158.87 26,363.28 (36,974.02) FIFO DTD 06/01/2021 0.750%05/31/2026 06/03/25 06/04/25 AMXCA 2023-1 A 025821JZ4 2,000,000.00 2,008,046.88 5,140.56 2,013,187.44 12,421.88 10,753.51 FIFO DTD 06/14/2023 4.870%05/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 BACCT 2023-Al Al 05522RDGO 3,449,000.00 3,460,317.03 8,719.26 3,469,036.29 22,634.06 18,229.74 FIFO DTD 06/16/2023 4.790%05/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 DCENT 2023-A2 A 254683CZ6 3,305,000.00 3,321,654.10 8,599.43 3,330,253.53 15,104.88 15,697.57 FIFO DTD 06/28/2023 4.930%06/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 AMXCA 2023-1 A 025821JZ4 2,720,000.00 2,730,943.75 6,991.15 2,737,934.90 13,387.50 12,436.45 FIFO DTD 06/14/2023 4.870%05/15/2028 06/26/25 06/27/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CAH4 525,000.00 489,706.06 848.84 490,554.90 13,063.48 468.67 FIFO DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 06/26/25 06/27/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CAH4 2,700,000.00 2,518,488.28 4,365.49 2,522,853.77 191,003.90 (9,930.08) FIFO DTD 08/31/2020 0.500%08/31/2027 Transaction Type Sub-Total 17,699,000.00 17,430,367.04 34,910.63 17,465,277.67 254,014.14 (31,563.31) Managed Account Sub-Total (1,402,493.82) 848,449.43 (554,044.39) 254,049.34 (31,541.97) Total Security Transactions ($1,402,493.82) $848,449.43 ($554,044.39) $254,049.34 ($31,541.97) PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 35 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 105 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Portfolio Summary RANCHO June 30, 2025 CUCAMONGA Cash Dividends Closing Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value PFM Managed Account $ 132,782.86 $ 64,870,620.94 PFM Cash Balance - 546,660.08 CAMP Pool - 38,713,972.16 State Pool - 145,787.37 Total $ 132,782.86 $ 104,277,040.55 I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted June 26, 2025. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated expenditures. L7 3� 7-T� Peter Castro,Treasurer Date ATTACHMENT 2 Page106 pfm a S et Customer Service management Ha Box 11813 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813 ACCOUNT STATEMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION Client Management Team Contents Meredith LaBuda Sullivan Cover/Disclosures Senior Portfolio Manager Summary Statement Individual Accounts Accounts included in Statement - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS Jeremy King Key Account Manager MM Rachael Miller Client Consultant RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Tiffany Tint RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Institutional Sales&Relationship Manager NE"M Online Access https://www.pfmam.com Customer Service 1-717-232-2723 Page 107 pfm asset management Account Statement Important Disclosures For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 Mnt Disclosur This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains/losses are provided for informational 365 and dividing the result by 7.The yields quoted should not be considered a specific advice or recommendations.PFM Asset Management("PFMAM")is a division purposes only.Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine representation of the yield of the fund in the future,since the yield is not fixed. of U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc.("USBAM"),a SEC-registered investment the tax consequences of your security transactions.PFMAM does not report such Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and adviser.USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S.Bank National Association("U.S.Bank") information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the investments of a portfolio,determined by multiplying the par or principal value of and an indirect subsidiary of U.S.Bancorp.U.S.Bank is not responsible for and does accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal,state or each security or investment by its maturity(days or years),summing the not guarantee the products,services or performance of PFMAM.PFMAM maintains a other taxing authorities. products,and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio.The written disclosure statement of our background and business experience.If you would Financial Situation In order to better serve you,PFMAM should be promptly notified stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement,please contact Service of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation. statement.However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending Operations at the address below. Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients. redeemed in whole or in part before maturity,which could affect the yield represented. security has or is still able to be called. However,it does on occasion receive consent requests.In the event a consent request portfolio The securities in this portfolio,including shares of mutual funds,are not Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM,the FDIC(except for certain (normally$1.00 per share)resulting from all dividends declared during the month their instructions.PFMAM's Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting non-negotiable certificates of deposit)or any government agency.Investment in by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning Service Operations at the address below. securities involves risks,including the possible loss of the amount invested.Actual of the month.This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by Questions About an Account PFMAM's monthly statement is intended to detail our settlement values,accrued interest,and amortized cost amounts may vary for 365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month. investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns.Any YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return,based pools that are managed by PFMAM.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement's on the original cost,the annual interest receipts,maturity value and the time and executes(i.e.,settles)all investment transactions.The custodian statement is the beginning values. period from purchase date to maturity,stated as a percentage,on an annualized official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.PFMAM recognizes that Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected basis. clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank sources,but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return,based on the statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved. Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are current market value,the annual interest receipts,maturity value and the time Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate,U.S.Bancorp Investments,Inc. period remaining until maturity,stated as a percentage,on an annualized basis. due to a timing difference. which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit Industry Regulatory Authority("FINRA")and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking according to the client's specific investment policy and requirements.The funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM.Our clients Board("MSRB").You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client's custodian. retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies;implementing and enforcing 1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts.A brochure describing the FINRA consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place. Market Value Generally,PFMAM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request. of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services.There may be Key Terms and Definitions Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully.If you think your differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned, statement is wrong,missing account information,or if you need more information and the use of differing valuation sources and methods.Non-negotiable FDIC-insured plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity,plus all realized gains and about a transaction,please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt.If you have bank certificates of deposit are priced at par.Although PFMAM believes the prices to be losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity,less ratable amortization of any other concerns or questions regarding your account,or to request an updated reliable,the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities premium and all accrued expenses to the fund.Dividends are accrued daily and may copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement,please contact a member of your could have been bought or sold.Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered be paid either monthly or quarterly.The monthly earnings on this statement represent client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below. investment company or local government investment program is contained in the the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings PFM Asset Management appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement. on a quarterly basis.There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on Attn:Service Operations Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the the actual distribution date. 213 Market Street amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date Current Yield is the net change,exclusive of capital changes and income other than Harrisburg,PA 17101 until the date of the report.Discount or premium with respect to short term securities investment income,in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance)is amortized on a share over the seven-day base period including the statement date,expressed as a NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE straightline basis.Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is percentage of the value of one share(normally$1.00 per share)at the beginning of amortized using the constant yield basis. the seven-day period.This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by Page 108 Pfm asset management Account Statement Consolidated Summary Statement For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Portfolio Summary Investment Allocation Cash Dividends Closing Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent PFMAM Managed Account 132,782.86 64,870,620.94 Asset-Backed Security 6,246,525.16 6.02 CAMP Pool 0.00 38,713,972.16 Federal Agency Bond/ Note 621,439.64 0.60 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 145,787.37 Corporate Note 13,425,406.12 12.94 Bank Note 886,085.38 0.85 Total $132,782.86 $103,730,380.47 Certificate of Deposit 1,246,042.32 1.20 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Se, 7,976,845.33 7.69 Municipal Bond/ Note 324,722.36 0.31 Corporate Note 1,088,049.62 1.05 U.S.Treasury Bond/ Note 33,055,505.01 31.87 CAMP Pool 38,713,972.16 37.33 Local Agency Investment Fund 145,787.37 0.14 Total $103,730,380.47 100.000/0 Maturity Distribution(Fixed Income Holdings) Sector Allocation N Agy Bond/ Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent Note Local Agency 0.60% Under 30 days 39,103,980.43 37.70 Investment Fund Corporate Note 31 to 60 days 0.00 0.00 0.14% 12.94% CAMP Pool Bank Note 61 to 90 days 0.00 0.00 37.330o 0.85% 91 to 180 days 0.00 0.00 Cert of Deposit 181 days to 1 year 1,608,820.00 1.55 1.20% 1 to 2 years 16,100,309.31 15.52 Federal Agency Commercial 2 to 3 years 13,780,089.25 13.28 Mortgage-Backed 3 to 4 years 17 395 959.41 16.77 Security i: 7.69% 4 to 5 years 15,741,222.07 15.18 Muni Bond/Note Over 5 years 0.00 0.00 0.31% Priv Placement Total $103,730,380.47 100.000/0 Bond 1.05% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 672 US TSY Bond/Note PFM Asset Management Summary Page 1 Page 109 Pfm asset management Managed Account Summary Statement For the Month Ending 3une 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Summary-Managed Account Cash Transactions Summary- Managed Account Opening Market Value $64,811,654.79 Maturities/Calls 0.00 Maturities/Calls (56,779.11) Sale Proceeds 3,055,442.21 Principal Dispositions (2,703,280.08) Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income 144,817.34 Principal Acquisitions 2,470,059.88 Principal Payments 56,779.11 Unsettled Trades 0.00 Security Purchases (3,271,480.12) Change in Current Value 348,965.46 Net Cash Contribution (0.03) Reconciling Transactions 0.00 Closing Market Value $64,870,620.94 Earnings Reconciliation(Cash Basis)- Managed Account Cash Balance Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received 158,903.87 Closing Cash Balance $546,660.08 Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons (8,678.36) Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses (17,442.65) Total Cash Basis Earninas $132,782.86 Earnings Reconciliation(Accrual Basis) Total Ending Amortized Value of Securities 64,354,373.04 Ending Accrued Interest 454,596.34 Plus Proceeds from Sales 2,713,860.36 Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments 56,779.11 Plus Coupons/Dividends Received 144,817.34 Less Cost of New Purchases (2,475,591.14) Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities (64,600,407.63) Less Beginning Accrued Interest (418,556.97) Total Accrual Basis Earnings $229,870.45 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 1 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 110 Pfm asset management Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Account Summary Sector Allocation Description Par Value Market Value Percent U.S.Treasury Bond/ Note 33,890,000.00 33,055,505.01 50.95 Bank Note Municipal Bond/ Note 320,000.00 324,722.36 0.50 1.37% Cert of Deposit Federal Agency Commercial 7,873,638.12 7,976,845.33 12.30 1.92% Mortgage-Backed Security Corporate Note Federal Agency Bond/ Note 620,000.00 621,439.64 0.96 20.69% / Corporate Note 14,490,000.00 14,513,455.74 22.37 Fed Agy BondNote Certificate of Deposit 1,235,000.00 1,246,042.32 1.92 0.96% Bank Note 875,000.00 886,085.38 1.37 Federal Agency Asset-Backed Security 6,201,144.82 6,246,525.16 9.63 Commercial Mortgage-Backed Managed Account Sub-Total 65,504,782.94 64,870,620.94 100.00% Security Accrued Interest 454,596.34 12.30% Total Portfolio 65,504,782.94 65,325,217.28 Muni Bond/Note 0.50% US TSY Bond/Note Priv Placement 50.95% Bond Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00 1.68% Maturity Distribution Characteristics 26.82% 24.82% 24.27/o o Yield to Maturity at Cost 4.21% 21.24% Yield to Maturity at Market 4.01% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1076 2.48% 0.37% 0.00% 0-6 Months 6-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years Over 5 Years PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 2 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 111 Pfm asset management Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Issuer Summary Credit Quality(S&P Ratings) Market Value Issuer of Holdings Percent A Adobe Inc 475,355.26 0.73 NR 3.99% Amazon.com Inc 303,963.30 0.47 4.07% A+ American Express Co 984,115.13 1.51 BBB+ 9.88% BA Credit Card Trust 507,351.50 0.78 0.93% A- AAA AAA 6.31/o Bank of America Corp 436,395.13 0.67 6.48% AA Bayerische Motoren Werke AG 458,242.20 0.71 AA- 0.73% BlackRock Inc 414,058.05 0.64 2.66% BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 297,494.52 0.46 Caterpillar Inc 95,702.72 0.15 Charles Schwab Corp 291,528.00 0.45 Cintas Corp 185,414.59 0.29 Cisco Systems Inc 276,629.58 0.43 Citigroup Inc 1,024,579.85 1.57 Colgate-Palmolive Co 185,707.81 0.29 A 64.95/o Comcast Corp 436,115.03 0.67 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA 377,213.15 0.58 Credit Agricole Group 594,754.22 0.92 Cummins Inc 30,133.41 0.05 Deere&Co 193,020.40 0.30 Depository Trust&Clearing Corp 482,945.33 0.74 Federal Home Loan Banks 621,439.64 0.96 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 7,403,750.09 11.40 Federal National Mortgage Association 573,095.24 0.88 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 456,319.05 0.70 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv 262,815.42 0.41 Goldman Sachs Group Inc 432,067.67 0.67 Groupe BPCE 407,067.20 0.63 Hershey Co 734,272.40 1.13 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 972,008.19 1.49 Honda Motor Co Ltd 498,938.90 0.77 HSBC Holdings PLC 463,617.90 0.71 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 211,083.23 0.33 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 3 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 112 Pfm asset management Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Market Value Issuer of Holdings Percent International Business Machines Corp 121,245.38 0.19 Johnson&Johnson 91,510.11 0.14 JPMorgan Chase&Co 335,290.22 0.52 Kubota Credit Owner Trust 356,068.30 0.55 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA 146,886.31 0.23 Mars Inc 146,862.09 0.23 Medallion Financial Corp 244,220.90 0.38 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 268,469.12 0.41 Merck&Co Inc 477,081.45 0.74 Meta Platforms Inc 458,194.50 0.71 Morgan Stanley 462,367.77 0.71 National Australia Bank Ltd 398,998.40 0.62 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi 270,100.42 0.42 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust 120,941.76 0.19 Northern Trust Corp 399,473.60 0.62 PepsiCo Inc 254,565.00 0.39 PNC Financial Services Group Inc 269,776.38 0.42 State of Connecticut 177,836.05 0.27 State Street Corp 592,189.63 0.91 Texas Instruments Inc 390,200.00 0.60 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 242,256.24 0.37 Toyota Motor Corp 803,108.70 1.24 Truist Financial Corp 635,423.43 0.98 United States Treasury 33,055,505.01 50.95 UnitedHealth Group Inc 312,094.13 0.48 Verizon Master Trust 456,951.50 0.70 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 377,741.25 0.58 Walmart Inc 166,826.88 0.26 Wells Fargo&Co 886,085.38 1.37 WF Card Issuance Trust 830,466.31 1.28 World Omni Auto Trust 34,690.61 0.05 Total $64,870,620.94 100.00% PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 4 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 113 pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CC38 525,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/03/24 09/05/24 496,617.19 3.99 12.48 509,168.63 509,019.53 DTD 06/30/2021 0.875%06/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCJ8 600,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/06/22 01/07/22 585,468.75 1.44 14.27 596,764.91 581,736.60 DTD 06/30/2021 0.875%06/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 9128282A7 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/21/22 04/22/22 939,023.44 3.02 5,635.36 984,136.81 973,164.00 DTD 08/15/2016 1.500%08/15/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCZ2 1,500.000.00 AA+ Aal 05/12/22 05/13/22 1,379.472.66 2.84 3,299.18 1,465,671.16 1,444.863.00 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 200,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/28/24 10/31/24 188,554.69 4.14 379.08 192,283.01 192,851.60 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 310,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/01/21 11/03/21 308,595.31 1.22 587.57 309,624.75 298,919.98 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDG3 1,000.000.00 AA+ Aal 11/17/21 11/18/21 993.945.31 1.25 1,895.38 998,369.12 964,258.00 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJT9 575,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/01/24 07/02/24 565,948.24 4.66 10,610.50 569,382.85 576,347.80 DTD 01/16/2024 4.000%01/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJT9 925,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/24 08/02/24 922,904.30 4.10 17,069.06 923,660.44 927,168.20 DTD 01/16/2024 4.000%01/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CMH1 695,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/03/25 02/06/25 693,452.54 4.24 11,958.51 693,755.66 698,149.05 DTD 01/31/2025 4.125%01/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 700.000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/22 08/03/22 686,054.69 2.72 5,917.13 695.000.90 682.882.90 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 700,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/05/23 09/08/23 623,792.97 4.54 2,632.13 663,547.94 669,949.00 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CKEO 300,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/11/25 06/12/25 301,277.34 3.99 3,741.85 301,241.25 302,261.70 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 425,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/04/25 02/05/25 424,817.38 4.27 5,300.95 424,851.25 428,204.08 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 5 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 114 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 912828X88 550,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/02/24 12/05/24 526,968.75 4.19 1,668.31 532,160.07 536,335.80 DTD 05/15/2017 2.375%05/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CF132 500,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/04/23 01/06/23 475.625.00 3.93 5,735.50 488,887.22 490,195.50 DTD 08/01/2022 2.750%07/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAL5 300,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/28/24 10/31/24 269,636.72 4.09 282.79 276,271.22 278,519.40 DTD 09/30/2020 0.375%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFM8 425,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/03/23 05/08/23 436,488.28 0.00 4,406.76 430,872.90 428,818.20 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFM8 600,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/01/24 10/03/24 610,687.50 3.49 6,221.31 608,132.61 605,390.40 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 500,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/04/23 01/06/23 425,820.31 3.91 421.20 464,069.87 464,316.50 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 800,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/02/24 12/05/24 720,375.00 4.18 673.91 735,324.83 742,906.40 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CLX7 140,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/26/24 12/31/24 139,130.47 4.36 737.57 139,274.48 141,279.74 DTD 11/15/2024 4.125%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 9128283F5 825,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/25/23 01/30/23 776,950.20 3.58 2,370.75 801,194.76 797,671.88 DTD 11/15/2017 2.250%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282C1319 825,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/03/23 11/06/23 701,991.21 4.67 2,580.97 749,938.40 765,284.03 DTD 02/01/2021 0.750%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/05/23 04/06/23 973,671.88 3.34 10,331.49 985,783.41 975,977.00 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 300,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/05/23 07/07/23 261,703.13 4.26 942.62 277,761.68 280,863.30 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 500,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/02/23 10/04/23 429,921.88 4.75 1,571.04 457,098.52 468.105.50 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CGT2 525,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/03/25 03/05/25 519,093.75 4.02 4,783.81 519,683.46 524,015.63 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 6 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 115 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CBZ3 650,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/01/23 06/05/23 577,281.25 3.77 1,368.89 608,017.20 607,394.45 DTD 04/30/2021 1.250%04/30/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCH2 775,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/03/23 11/06/23 665,561.53 4.66 26.32 704,425.72 721,415.73 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCRO 725,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/03/24 01/05/24 634,601.56 4.01 3,024.17 664,012.20 668,274.55 DTD 08/02/2021 1.000%07/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282OA0 980,000.00 AA+ Aal 12/04/23 12/05/23 995,197.66 4.26 11,393.17 990,578.81 1,007,026.44 DTD 10/02/2023 4.625%09/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128201`9 700,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/01/24 02/05/24 731,308.59 3.83 5,749.32 722,614.39 725,101.30 DTD 10/31/2023 4.875%10/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128285M8 710,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/04/24 03/06/24 676,413.67 4.25 2,833.73 685,853.09 696,687.50 DTD 11/15/2018 3.125%11/15/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJR3 1,575,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/01/24 04/03/24 1,534,517.58 4.35 160.50 1,544,351.58 1,575,984.38 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 275,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/03/24 06/05/24 244,137.70 4.45 2,007.42 250,690.51 256,888.78 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDW8 550,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/01/24 02/05/24 498.738.28 3.82 4,014.85 513,143.33 513,777.55 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 9128286131 1,275,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/02/24 05/06/24 1,167,123.05 4.62 12,573.90 1,191,050.75 1,227,686.03 DTD 02/15/2019 2.625%02/15/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEE7 1,200,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/03/24 06/05/24 1,093,734.38 4.44 7,163.93 1,115,454.72 1,143,234.00 DTD 03/31/2022 2.375%03/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 185,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/01/24 07/02/24 172,310.16 4.47 896.09 174,714.87 179,334.38 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/01/24 08/02/24 956,757.81 3.88 4,843.75 964,480.42 969,375.00 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEV9 275,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/04/24 09/05/24 270,423.83 3.63 24.29 271,148.22 269,940.55 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 7 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 116 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value U.S.Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CEV9 525,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/03/24 09/05/24 513,290.04 3.76 46.37 515,138.81 515,341.05 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 350,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/30/25 06/04/25 332.705.08 3.92 3,832.35 332,991.00 335,206.90 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 490,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/01/24 10/03/24 470,878.52 3.51 5,365.30 473,618.43 469,289.66 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFLO 625,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/01/24 11/05/24 616,357.42 4.19 6,087.77 617,412.24 627,783.13 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 375,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/03/25 02/06/25 375,849.61 4.32 44.58 375,787.76 384,228.38 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 690,000.00 AA+ Aal 01/02/25 01/07/25 690,485.16 4.36 82.03 690,443.68 706,980.21 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CG34 985,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/03/25 03/05/25 960,221.09 4.07 14,380.46 961,720.25 973,341.54 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGS4 115,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/12/25 05/13/25 112,655.08 4.09 1,047.88 112,713.71 114,164.41 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGS4 320,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/11/25 04/15/25 312,212.50 4.17 2,915.85 312,514.11 317,674.88 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMU2 695,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/01/25 04/02/25 697,416.21 3.92 6,987.98 697,309.55 701,325.89 DTD 03/31/2025 4.000%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CHF1 600,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/11/25 06/12/25 591,867.19 4.05 1,905.74 591,945.85 598,593.60 DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 33,890,000.00 32,270,033.84 3.80 210,558.12 32,876,043.31 33,055,505.01 Municipal Bond/ Note LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B 544647KY5 145,000.00 NR Aa2 04/24/25 05/13/25 145,000.00 4.42 855.11 145,000.00 146,886.31 DTD 05/13/2025 4.423%07/01/2028 CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL 20772KZK8 175,000.00 AA- Aa3 04/23/25 05/07/25 175,000.00 4.49 1,178.36 175,000.00 177,836.05 DTD 05/07/2025 4.489%03/15/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 8 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 117 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Municipal Bond/ Note Security Type Sub-Total 320,000.00 320,000.00 4.46 2,033.47 320,000.00 324,722.36 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 310,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 294,500.00 5.03 881.69 303,119.70 306,218.31 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 350,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 327,810.55 4.97 931.58 338,316.38 343,745.50 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 FHMS KJ46 Al 3137HAD45 595,556.63 AA+ Aal 07/19/23 07/27/23 595,541.76 4.78 2,370.81 595,547.60 600,344.91 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 600,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/27/23 08/01/23 600,515.63 4.80 2,409.50 600,313.94 610,742.40 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136130DE6 573,081.49 AA+ Aal 08/17/23 08/22/23 551,725.26 5.04 2,001.01 559,783.53 573,095.24 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 550,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/11/23 10/19/23 537,935.20 5.25 2,172.50 541,805.99 559,378.05 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 600,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/07/23 09/14/23 591,124.20 4.99 2,325.00 594,088.32 608,632.80 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 450,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/25/23 10/31/23 435,652.65 5.60 1,818.75 439,933.47 459,171.90 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 FHMS K510 A2 3137H133D4 220,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/14/23 11/21/23 219,363.98 5.14 929.32 219,554.01 225,879.72 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 320,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/28/23 12/07/23 319.080.64 4.93 1,296.00 319,351.00 326,943.36 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 290,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/01/24 02/08/24 292,899.71 4.34 1,104.90 292,134.78 293,719.54 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 300,000.00 AA+ Aal 07/01/24 07/05/24 302,871.09 4.95 1,295.00 302,326.25 309,980.70 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 9 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 118 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 215,000.00 AA+ Aal 09/04/24 09/12/24 219,295.70 4.06 807.68 218,647.25 217,626.44 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 425,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/13/24 08/22/24 432.426.45 4.23 1,635.54 431,246.20 431,871.83 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 550,000.00 AA+ Aal 08/07/24 08/15/24 555,144.70 4.33 2,082.21 554,313.40 557,205.55 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 360,000.00 AA+ Aal 10/08/24 10/16/24 367,195.32 4.34 1,437.30 366,259.98 368,295.48 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 FHMS K530 A2 3137HHJL6 595,000.00 AA+ Aal 11/19/24 11/27/24 598,098.17 4.67 2,376.03 597,797.89 608,776.63 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKXJ8 210,000.00 AA+ Aal 04/15/25 04/24/25 209,992.65 4.41 771.75 209,993.04 211,865.01 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 360,000.00 AA+ Aal 03/11/25 03/20/25 359,996.04 4.43 1,329.00 359,996.97 363,351.96 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 7,873,638.12 7,811,169.70 4.79 29,975.57 7,844,529.70 7,976,845.33 Federal Agency Bond / Note FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 620,000.00 AA+ Aal 06/12/25 06/13/25 619,175.40 3.95 1,201.25 619,196.28 621,439.64 DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 620,000.00 619,175.40 3.95 1,201.25 619,196.28 621,439.64 Corporate CITIGROUP INC 172967KNO 170,000.00 BBB+ A3 05/25/21 05/27/21 187,113.90 1.29 963.33 172,894.12 168,692.87 DTD 05/02/2016 3.400%05/01/2026 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 110,000.00 A+ Al 09/08/21 09/13/21 109.755.80 1.17 44.69 109,950.59 106,752.25 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 250,000.00 A+ Al 05/12/22 05/16/22 228,305.00 3.42 101.56 244,885.76 242,618.75 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 10 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 119 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate MORGAN STANLEY 6176113R8 225,000.00 A- Al 07/05/23 07/07/23 210,663.00 5.41 3,007.81 219,969.02 222,178.73 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477CD3 440,000.00 A Aa3 08/01/23 08/03/23 440.246.40 5.25 9,536.46 440,084.95 444,524.96 DTD 08/03/2023 5.272%08/03/2026 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WDZ1 200,000.00 A- A3 12/01/21 12/03/21 197,074.00 1.62 808.89 199,270.21 192,894.80 DTD 09/09/2021 1.300%09/09/2026 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE) 025816CM9 225,000.00 A- A2 06/01/22 06/03/22 207,758.25 3.54 587.81 219,765.70 217,626.75 DTD 11/04/2021 1.650%11/04/2026 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFK3 155,000.00 A- A2 10/30/23 11/02/23 154,945.75 5.61 1,157.33 154,974.47 157,599.35 DTD 11/02/2023 5.600%11/13/2026 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EWA3 200,000.00 A Al 01/11/22 01/13/22 198,872.00 1.82 1,605.56 199,654.95 193,020.40 DTD 01/10/2022 1.700%01/11/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GLE7 350,000.00 A- Al 07/05/23 07/07/23 344,473.50 5.58 7,951.61 347,573.20 351,015.35 DTD 01/20/2023 5.080%01/20/2027 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 38141GWB6 435,000.00 BBB+ A2 09/02/22 09/07/22 421,484.55 4.64 7,210.73 430,163.88 432,067.67 DTD 01/26/2017 3.850%01/26/2027 IBM CORP (CALLABLE) 459200KM2 125,000.00 A- A3 03/24/22 03/28/22 120.833.75 2.94 1,084.72 123,624.73 121,245.38 DTD 02/09/2022 2.200%02/09/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAD4 275,000.00 A- Baal 03/24/22 03/28/22 255,332.00 2.83 1,151.74 268,336.83 268,846.05 DTD 03/02/2021 1.267%03/02/2027 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE) 808513BYO 300,000.00 A- A2 04/27/22 04/29/22 284,730.00 3.60 2,409.17 294,729.05 291,528.00 DTD 03/03/2022 2.450%03/03/2027 NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE) 665859AW4 400,000.00 A+ A2 05/12/22 05/16/22 405,484.00 3.70 2,266.67 401,986.55 399,473.60 DTD 05/10/2022 4.000%05/10/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 65,000.00 A+ A2 05/17/22 05/20/22 64,964.90 3.71 307.31 64,986.82 64,400.38 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 250,000.00 A+ A2 06/01/22 06/03/22 253,095.00 3.43 1,181.94 251,137.66 247,693.75 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 11 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page120 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE) 693475AT2 275,000.00 A- A3 08/04/22 08/08/22 270,765.00 3.50 1,010.63 273,331.59 269,776.38 DTD 05/19/2017 3.150%05/19/2027 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 400,000.00 AA- Aa2 06/09/22 06/13/22 396.532.00 4.10 954.56 398,652.19 398,998.40 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 190,000.00 A- Baal 08/22/22 08/24/22 165,100.50 4.08 878.75 179,474.75 178,588.98 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 200,000.00 A- Baal 10/27/22 10/31/22 163,506.00 5.54 925.00 183,969.93 187,988.40 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TKJ3 450,000.00 A+ Al 10/04/22 10/06/22 445,198.50 4.79 5,744.38 447,849.55 453,737.70 DTD 09/20/2022 4.550%09/20/2027 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE) 882508BC7 400,000.00 A+ Aa3 12/07/22 12/09/22 375,432.00 4.30 1,868.89 388,273.10 390,200.00 DTD 11/03/2017 2.900%11/03/2027 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) 20030NEA5 425,000.00 A- A3 01/25/23 01/30/23 443,173.00 4.35 2,905.35 433,834.54 436,115.03 DTD 11/07/2022 5.350%11/15/2027 AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE) 023135CP9 300,000.00 AA Al 12/07/22 12/09/22 302,691.00 4.35 1,137.50 301,282.88 303,963.30 DTD 12/01/2022 4.550%12/01/2027 JOHNSON&JOHNSON (CALLABLE) 478160DH4 90.000.00 AAA Aaa 02/18/25 02/20/25 89,947.80 4.57 1,490.13 89,953.75 91.510.11 DTD 02/20/2025 4.550%03/01/2028 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61747YFP5 235,000.00 A- Al 05/02/24 05/06/24 236,236.10 5.50 2,877.81 235,773.61 240,189.04 DTD 04/19/2024 5.652%04/13/2028 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEE2 130,000.00 A Al 05/02/24 05/06/24 130,378.30 5.49 1,388.11 130,238.02 132,685.02 DTD 04/22/2024 5.571%04/22/2028 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 (CALLABLE) 17252MAR1 185,000.00 A- A3 04/28/25 05/02/25 184,763.20 4.25 1,273.42 184,775.63 185,414.59 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2028 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BHO 425,000.00 A Al 05/04/23 05/08/23 429,228.75 4.03 2,859.90 427,377.77 428,360.90 DTD 05/04/2023 4.250%05/04/2028 CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE) 231021AY2 30,000.00 A A2 05/06/25 05/09/25 29,979.00 4.28 184.17 29,979.97 30,133.41 DTD 05/09/2025 4.250%05/09/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 12 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 121 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE) 30303M8L9 450,000.00 AA- Aa3 06/01/23 06/05/23 450,837.00 4.56 2,645.00 450,486.21 458,194.50 DTD 05/03/2023 4.600%05/15/2028 MERCK&CO INC (CALLABLE) 58933YBH7 475,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/18/23 05/22/23 471.546.75 4.21 2,351.25 473,006.93 477,081.45 DTD 05/17/2023 4.050%05/17/2028 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 460,000.00 A- A2 05/28/25 06/03/25 460,036.80 4.65 1,663.67 460,036.05 463,617.90 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WEM9 300,000.00 A- A3 07/07/23 07/11/23 298,644.00 5.23 7,431.25 299,180.06 306,044.10 DTD 07/07/2023 5.125%07/07/2028 BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE) 05565ECE3 450,000.00 A A2 08/14/23 08/17/23 444,933.00 5.31 8,837.50 446,836.66 458,242.20 DTD 08/11/2023 5.050%08/11/2028 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 575,000.00 A+ Aa3 10/02/23 10/04/23 572,148.00 5.92 8,527.19 573,052.99 601,141.23 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803%09/29/2028 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY 21688ABC5 370,000.00 A+ Aa2 01/10/24 01/12/24 370,518.00 4.77 8,485.33 370,378.54 377,213.15 DTD 01/09/2024 4.800%01/09/2029 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEU6 200,000.00 A Al 01/16/25 01/24/25 200,000.00 4.92 4,286.97 200,000.00 202,605.20 DTD 01/24/2025 4.915%01/24/2029 CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE) 17275RBR2 270,000.00 AA- Al 02/21/24 02/26/24 269,905.50 4.86 4,546.88 269,929.41 276,629.58 DTD 02/26/2024 4.850%02/26/2029 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913UA03 95,000.00 A A2 08/12/24 08/16/24 94,742.55 4.44 1,558.59 94,783.78 95,702.72 DTD 08/16/2024 4.375%08/16/2029 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) 00724PAJ8 460,000.00 A+ Al 01/14/25 01/17/25 459,296.20 4.98 10,373.00 459,354.37 475,355.26 DTD 01/17/2025 4.950%01/17/2030 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFX5 110,000.00 NR A2 02/04/25 02/07/25 109,831.70 4.98 2,178.00 109,843.94 112,501.07 DTD 02/07/2025 4.950%02/07/2030 PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) 713448GB8 250,000.00 A+ Al 02/07/25 02/10/25 248,570.00 4.73 4,600.00 248,671.74 254,565.00 DTD 02/07/2025 4.600%02/07/2030 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BL1 300,000.00 A Al 02/24/25 02/25/25 300,921.00 4.68 5,027.08 300,862.53 305,911.50 DTD 02/24/2025 4.750%02/24/2030 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 13 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page122 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Corporate MARS INC (CALLABLE) 571676AY1 145,000.00 A A2 03/05/25 03/12/25 144,843.40 4.83 2,107.33 144,851.96 146,862.09 DTD 03/12/2025 4.800%03/01/2030 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477DB6 145,000.00 A Aa3 04/22/25 04/24/25 145.000.00 4.83 1,304.51 145,000.00 147,664.67 DTD 04/24/2025 4.834%04/24/2030 WALMART INC (CALLABLE) 931142FN8 165,000.00 AA Aa2 04/23/25 04/28/25 164,714.55 4.39 1,256.06 164,723.68 166,826.88 DTD 04/28/2025 4.350%04/28/2030 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 450,000.00 AA- Aa3 06/26/25 06/27/25 412,749.00 4.31 1,830.00 412,827.94 414,058.05 DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE) 194162ATO 185,000.00 A+ Aa3 04/28/25 05/02/25 184,901.95 4.21 1,273.42 184,905.45 185,707.81 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2030 NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE) 637639AO8 475,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/13/25 05/20/25 474,705.50 4.71 2,542.57 474,712.83 482,945.33 DTD 05/20/2025 4.700%05/20/2030 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBP2 250,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/21/25 05/29/25 250,000.00 4.91 1,092.00 250,000.00 254,745.75 DTD 05/29/2025 4.914%05/29/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 14,490,000.00 14,276,907.85 4.44 150,793.53 14,382,200.84 14,513,455.74 DepositCertificate of MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NR NR 07/30/20 07/30/20 245,000.00 0.55 3.69 245,000.00 244,220.90 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 638730P65 400,000.00 A+ Al 09/18/23 09/20/23 400,000.00 5.61 17,827.33 400,000.00 407,067.20 DTD 09/20/2023 5.610%09/18/2026 CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY 22536DWD6 590,000.00 A+ Al 02/01/24 02/05/24 590,000.00 4.76 11,389.62 590,000.00 594,754.22 DTD 02/05/2024 4.760%02/01/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 1,235,000.00 1,235,000.00 4.21 29,220.64 1,235,000.00 1,246,042.32 WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) 9498836D4 875,000.00 A+ Aa2 08/03/23 08/09/23 874,475.00 5.47 19,075.00 874,807.14 886,085.38 DTD 08/09/2023 5.450%08/07/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 14 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page123 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type Sub-Total 875,000.00 874,475.00 5.47 19,075.00 874,807.14 886,085.38 Asset-Backed Security HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 10.113.55 AAA NR 03/09/22 03/16/22 10,113.16 2.22 9.98 10,113.44 10.096.63 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 1,847.36 AAA NR 01/11/22 01/19/22 1,847.20 1.26 0.97 1,847.32 1,844.74 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 269,512.85 NR Aaa 08/09/24 08/21/24 269,491.74 4.89 366.09 269,498.84 269,867.52 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RA132 34,671.06 AAA NR 02/06/24 02/14/24 34,668.35 5.05 77.82 34,669.52 34,690.61 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 120,000.00 NR Aaa 10/18/23 10/25/23 119,975.64 5.94 316.27 119,984.44 120,941.76 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 75,000.00 NR Aaa 11/01/23 11/08/23 74,986.79 5.67 118.13 74,991.20 75,796.42 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 350,000.00 NR Aaa 02/11/25 02/12/25 354,060.55 4.92 818.22 353,677.62 356,068.30 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 TAOT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 240,000.00 AAA NR 07/23/24 07/30/24 239,999.86 4.88 520.53 240,000.00 242,256.24 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 200,000.00 AAA NR 10/08/24 10/16/24 199,985.36 4.41 392.00 199,987.92 200,986.60 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 BACCT 2024-A1 A 05522RDJ4 500,000.00 AAA Aaa 06/06/24 06/13/24 499,971.95 4.93 1,095.56 499,978.89 507,351.50 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 500,000.00 AAA Aaa 01/30/25 01/31/25 497.929.69 4.44 962.22 498,115.74 501,112.00 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 345,000.00 AAA NR 07/16/24 07/23/24 344,984.34 4.65 713.00 344,987.32 349,011.66 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 160,000.00 AAA Aaa 10/08/24 10/16/24 159,969.18 4.40 293.33 159,973.49 160,445.28 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 375,000.00 NR Aaa 03/18/25 03/25/25 374,987.25 4.50 515.63 374,988.70 377,741.25 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 15 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page124 Pfm asset management Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Asset-Backed Security BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 295,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/04/25 02/12/25 294.970.94 4.56 224.20 294,973.93 297,494.52 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 125,000.00 NR Aaa 04/29/25 05/08/25 124,986.04 4.15 230.56 124,986.76 125,232.25 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 280,000.00 AAA Aaa 10/17/24 10/24/24 279,958.39 4.29 533.87 279,963.86 281,280.16 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 455,000.00 AAA Aaa 03/18/25 03/25/25 454,955.77 4.45 899.89 454,959.21 456,319.05 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 BAAT 2025-1A A3 0559413AD8 85,000.00 NR Aaa 05/06/25 05/12/25 84,994.14 4.35 112.98 84,994.58 85,379.78 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 265,000.00 NR Aaa 01/14/25 01/23/25 264,943.63 4.78 562.98 264,948.99 268,469.12 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 VZMT 2025-3 AlA 92348KDY6 455,000.00 NR Aaa 03/25/25 03/31/25 454,980.44 4.51 627.02 454,982.62 456,951.50 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 AMXCA 2025-2 A 025823KP4 415,000.00 AAA NR 05/06/25 05/13/25 414,992.49 4.28 789.42 414,992.82 417,476.72 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 100,000.00 AAA Aaa 05/06/25 05/14/25 99,985.28 4.28 178.33 99,985.73 100,525.40 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 WFCIT 2025-Al A 92970OA34 545,000.00 AAA NR 06/03/25 06/10/25 544,990.95 4.34 1,379.76 544,992.83 549,186.15 DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 6,201,144.82 6,202,729.13 4.59 11,738.76 6,202,595.77 6,246,525.16 Managed Account Sub-Total 65,504,782.94 63,609,490.92 4.18 454,596.34 64,354,373.04 64,870,620.94 Securities Sub-Total $65,504,782.94 $63,609,490.92 4.21% $454,596.34 $64,354,373.04 $64,870,620.94 Accrued Interest $454,596.34 Total Investments $65,325,217.28 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 16 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 125 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CC38 525,000.00 WeIlsFar 96.96 509,019.53 12,402.34 (149.10) 0.98 4.01 DTD 06/30/2021 0.875%06/30/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CC38 600,000.00 WeIlsFar 96.96 581,736.60 (3,732.15) (15,028.31) 0.98 4.01 DTD 06/30/2021 0.875%06/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 9128282A7 1,000,000.00 BOFAML 97.32 973,164.00 34,140.56 (10,972.81) 1.09 3.96 DTD 08/15/2016 1.500%08/15/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCZ2 1,500,000.00 Nomura 96.32 1,444,863.00 65,390.34 (20,808.16) 1.22 3.92 DTD 09/30/2021 0.875%09/30/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDG3 200,000.00 BMO 96.43 192,851.60 4,296.91 568.59 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDG3 310,000.00 MorganSt 96.43 298,919.98 (9,675.33) (10,704.77) 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/B 91282CDG3 1,000,000.00 Citigrou 96.43 964,258.00 (29,687.31) (34,111.12) 1.30 3.90 DTD 11/01/2021 1.125%10/31/2026 US TREASURY N/13 91282CJT9 575,000.00 Nomura 100.23 576,347.80 10,399.56 6,964.95 1.45 3.85 DTD 01/16/2024 4.000%01/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CJT9 925,000.00 MorganSt 100.23 927,168.20 4,263.90 3,507.76 1.45 3.85 DTD 01/16/2024 4.000%01/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMH1 695,000.00 MorganSt 100.45 698,149.05 4,696.51 4,393.39 1.50 3.84 DTD 01/31/2025 4.125%01/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828V98 700,000.00 BOFAML 97.55 682,882.90 (3,171.79) (12,118.00) 1.56 3.83 DTD 02/15/2017 2.250%02/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828ZB9 700,000.00 BMO 95.71 669,949.00 46,156.03 6,401.06 1.61 3.82 DTD 03/02/2020 1.125%02/28/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 300,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.75 302,261.70 984.36 1,020.45 1.61 3.80 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 425,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.75 428,204.08 3,386.70 3,352.83 1.61 3.80 DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 912828X88 550,000.00 WeIlsFar 97.52 536,335.80 9,367.05 4,175.73 1.80 3.77 DTD 05/15/2017 2.375%05/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CF132 500,000.00 BMO 98.04 490,195.50 14,570.50 1,308.28 1.97 3.75 DTD 08/01/2022 2.750%07/31/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAL5 300,000.00 BOFAML 92.84 278,519.40 8,882.68 2,248.18 2.19 3.73 DTD 09/30/2020 0.375%09/30/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 17 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page126 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CFM8 425,000.00 Citigrou 100.90 428,818.20 (7,670.08) (2,054.70) 2.11 3.73 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFM8 600,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.90 605,390.40 (5,297.10) (2,742.21) 2.11 3.73 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282CAU5 500,000.00 BOFAML 92.86 464,316.50 38,496.19 246.63 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CAU5 800,000.00 Citigrou 92.86 742,906.40 22,531.40 7,581.57 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/02/2020 0.500%10/31/2027 US TREASURY N/B 91282CLX7 140,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.91 141,279.74 2,149.27 2,005.26 2.23 3.74 DTD 11/15/2024 4.125%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282831`5 825,000.00 Citigrou 96.69 797,671.88 20,721.68 (3,522.88) 2.27 3.74 DTD 11/15/2017 2.250%11/15/2027 US TREASURY N/13 91282C1319 825,000.00 BMO 92.76 765,284.03 63,292.82 15,345.63 2.50 3.73 DTD 02/01/2021 0.750%01/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128283W8 1,000,000.00 BMO 97.60 975,977.00 2,305.12 (9,806.41) 2.47 3.74 DTD 02/15/2018 2.750%02/15/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CBS9 300,000.00 JPMorgan 93.62 280,863.30 19,160.17 3,101.62 2.65 3.73 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBS9 500,000.00 BOFAML 93.62 468,105.50 38,183.62 11,006.98 2.65 3.73 DTD 03/31/2021 1.250%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGT2 525,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.81 524,015.63 4,921.88 4,332.17 2.57 3.72 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CBZ3 650,000.00 BMO 93.45 607,394.45 30,113.20 (622.75) 2.73 3.73 DTD 04/30/2021 1.250%04/30/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CCH2 775,000.00 MorganSt 93.09 721,415.73 55,854.20 16,990.01 2.89 3.73 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCRO 725,000.00 WeIlsFar 92.18 668,274.55 33,672.99 4,262.35 2.97 3.73 DTD 08/02/2021 1.000%07/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 912820A0 980,000.00 BOFAML 102.76 1,007,026.44 11,828.78 16,447.63 2.97 3.74 DTD 10/02/2023 4.625%09/30/2028 US TREASURY N/B 91282CJF9 700,000.00 Citigrou 103.59 725,101.30 (6,207.29) 2,486.91 3.04 3.75 DTD 10/31/2023 4.875%10/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 9128285M8 710,000.00 BMO 98.13 696,687.50 20,273.83 10,834.41 3.15 3.75 DTD 11/15/2018 3.125%11/15/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 18 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page127 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/13 91282CJR3 1,575,000.00 BMO 100.06 1,575,984.38 41,466.80 31,632.80 3.25 3.76 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 275,000.00 BMO 93.41 256,888.78 12,751.08 6,198.27 3.39 3.76 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CDW8 550,000.00 Nomura 93.41 513,777.55 15,039.27 634.22 3.39 3.76 DTD 01/31/2022 1.750%01/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 9128286131 1,275,000.00 BOFAML 96.29 1,227,686.03 60,562.98 36,635.28 3.38 3.76 DTD 02/15/2019 2.625%02/15/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEE7 1,200,000.00 Citigrou 95.27 1,143,234.00 49,499.62 27,779.28 3.51 3.77 DTD 03/31/2022 2.375%03/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 185,000.00 BMO 96.94 179,334.38 7,024.22 4,619.51 3.56 3.77 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEM9 1,000,000.00 BOFAML 96.94 969,375.00 12,617.19 4,894.58 3.56 3.77 DTD 05/02/2022 2.875%04/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CEV9 275,000.00 Nomura 98.16 269,940.55 (483.28) (1,207.67) 3.71 3.78 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CEV9 525,000.00 BOFAML 98.16 515,341.05 2,051.01 202.24 3.71 3.78 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 350,000.00 WeIlsFar 95.77 335,206.90 2,501.82 2,215.90 3.78 3.78 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 490,000.00 Nomura 95.77 469,289.66 (1,588.86) (4,328.77) 3.78 3.78 DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CFLO 625,000.00 BOFAML 100.45 627,783.13 11,425.71 10,370.89 3.85 3.79 DTD 09/30/2022 3.875%09/30/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 375,000.00 Nomura 102.46 384,228.38 8,378.77 8,440.62 4.06 3.81 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 690,000.00 MorganSt 102.46 706,980.21 16,495.05 16,536.53 4.06 3.81 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 US TREASURY N/13 91282CG34 985,000.00 Citigrou 98.82 973,341.54 13,120.45 11,621.29 4.14 3.82 DTD 01/31/2023 3.500%01/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGS4 115,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.27 114,164.41 1,509.33 1,450.70 4.29 3.83 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CGS4 320,000.00 WeIlsFar 99.27 317,674.88 5,462.38 5,160.77 4.29 3.83 DTD 03/31/2023 3.625%03/31/2030 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 19 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 128 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt U.S.Treasury Bond I Note US TREASURY N/B 91282CMU2 695,000.00 Nomura 100.91 701,325.89 3,909.68 4,016.34 4.25 3.82 DTD 03/31/2025 4.000%03/31/2030 US TREASURY N/B 91282CHF1 600,000.00 BMO 99.77 598,593.60 6,726.41 6,647.75 4.44 3.84 DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 33,890,000.00 33,055,505.01 785,471.17 179,461.70 2.63 3.80 Municipal Bond I Note LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B 544647KY5 145,000.00 Raymond] 101.30 146,886.31 1,886.31 1,886.31 2.77 4.00 DTD 05/13/2025 4.423%07/01/2028 CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL 20772KZK8 175,000.00 Barclays 101.62 177,836.05 2,836.05 2,836.05 3.36 4.09 DTD 05/07/2025 4.489%03/15/2029 Security Type Sub-Total 320,000.00 324,722.36 4,722.36 4,722.36 3.10 4.05 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 310,000.00 Barclays 98.78 306,218.31 11,718.31 3,098.61 1.37 4.18 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 350,000.00 TD Secur 98.21 343,745.50 15,934.95 5,429.12 1.91 4.06 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 FHMS K346 Al 3137HAD45 595,556.63 3PMorgan 100.80 600,344.91 4,803.15 4,797.31 1.85 4.23 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 600,000.00 SAN 101.79 610,742.40 10,226.77 10,428.46 2.64 4.10 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136BODE6 573,081.49 3PMorgan 100.00 573,095.24 21,369.98 13,311.71 2.78 4.15 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 550,000.00 BMO 101.71 559,378.05 21,442.85 17,572.06 2.81 4.10 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 600,000.00 WellsFar 101.44 608,632.80 17,508.60 14,544.48 2.79 4.10 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 450,000.00 MorganSt 102.04 459,171.90 23,519.25 19,238.43 2.89 4.07 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 220,000.00 3PMorgan 102.67 225,879.72 6,515.74 6,325.71 2.92 4.13 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 20 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 129 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 320,000.00 BOFAML 102.17 326,943.36 7,862.72 7,592.36 2.96 4.10 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 290,000.00 JPMorgan 101.28 293,719.54 819.83 1,584.76 3.05 4.12 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 300,000.00 WellsFar 103.33 309,980.70 7,109.61 7,654.45 3.30 4.16 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 215,000.00 BOFAML 101.22 217,626.44 (1,669.26) (1,020.81) 3.64 4.16 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 425,000.00 MorganSt 101.62 431,871.83 (554.62) 625.63 3.61 4.16 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 550,000.00 BMO 101.31 557,205.55 2,060.85 2,892.15 3.62 4.16 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 360,000.00 MorganSt 102.30 368,295.48 1,100.16 2,035.50 3.73 4.17 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 FHMS K530 A2 3137HH]L6 595,000.00 JPMorgan 102.32 608,776.63 10,678.46 10,978.74 3.75 4.17 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKX]8 210,000.00 JPMorgan 100.89 211,865.01 1,872.36 1,871.97 4.05 4.19 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 360,000.00 MorganSt 100.93 363,351.96 3,355.92 3,354.99 4.12 4.20 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 7,873,638.12 7,976,845.33 165,675.63 132,315.63 3.00 4.14 Federal Agency Bond I Note FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 620,000.00 Nomura 100.23 621,439.64 2,264.24 2,243.36 1.83 3.79 DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 620,000.00 621,439.64 2,264.24 2,243.36 1.83 3.79 Corporate CITIGROUP INC 172967KNO 170,000.00 JPMorgan 99.23 168,692.87 (18,421.03) (4,201.25) 0.81 4.38 DTD 05/02/2016 3.400%05/01/2026 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236T]K2 110,000.00 JPMorgan 97.05 106,752.25 (3,003.55) (3,198.34) 0.94 4.29 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 21 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page130 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 250,000.00 JANE 97.05 242,618.75 14,313.75 (2,267.01) 0.94 4.29 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 MORGAN STANLEY 6176133R8 225,000.00 SEEL 98.75 222,178.73 11,515.73 2,209.71 1.03 4.37 DTD 07/25/2016 3.125%07/27/2026 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477CD3 440,000.00 JPMorgan 07/03/26 101.03 444,524.96 4,278.56 4,440.01 0.96 4.34 DTD 08/03/2023 5.272%08/03/2026 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WDZ1 200,000.00 RBC Capi 96.45 192,894.80 (4,179.20) (6,375.41) 1.16 4.40 DTD 09/09/2021 1.300%09/09/2026 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE) 025816CM9 225,000.00 JANE 10/04/26 96.72 217,626.75 9,868.50 (2,138.95) 1.30 4.25 DTD 11/04/2021 1.650%11/04/2026 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFK3 155,000.00 MIZU 10/13/26 101.68 157,599.35 2,653.60 2,624.88 1.23 4.35 DTD 11/02/2023 5.600%11/13/2026 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EWA3 200,000.00 JPMorgan 96.51 193,020.40 (5,851.60) (6,634.55) 1.47 4.12 DTD 01/10/2022 1.700%01/11/2027 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GLE7 350,000.00 JPMorgan 01/20/26 100.29 351,015.35 6,541.85 3,442.15 0.53 5.28 DTD 01/20/2023 5.080%01/20/2027 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 38141GWB6 435,000.00 MorganSt 01/26/26 99.33 432,067.67 10,583.12 1,903.79 1.06 4.34 DTD 01/26/2017 3.850%01/26/2027 IBM CORP (CALLABLE) 459200KM2 125,000.00 Deutsche 01/09/27 97.00 121,245.38 411.63 (2,379.35) 1.53 4.23 DTD 02/09/2022 2.200%02/09/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAD4 275,000.00 GoldmanS 03/02/26 97.76 268,846.05 13,514.05 509.22 0.66 4.89 DTD 03/02/2021 1.267%03/02/2027 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE) 808513BYO 300,000.00 CSFirstB 02/03/27 97.18 291,528.00 6,798.00 (3,201.05) 1.59 4.25 DTD 03/03/2022 2.450%03/03/2027 NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE) 665859AW4 400,000.00 Deutsche 04/10/27 99.87 399,473.60 (6,010.40) (2,512.95) 1.72 4.10 DTD 05/10/2022 4.000%05/10/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 65,000.00 BOFAML 04/15/27 99.08 64,400.38 (564.52) (586.44) 1.74 4.24 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEG3 250,000.00 MAXE 04/15/27 99.08 247,693.75 (5,401.25) (3,443.91) 1.74 4.24 DTD 05/20/2022 3.700%05/15/2027 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE) 693475AT2 275,000.00 JANE 04/19/27 98.10 269,776.38 (988.62) (3,555.21) 1.77 4.23 DTD 05/19/2017 3.150%05/19/2027 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 400,000.00 JPMorgan 99.75 398,998.40 2,466.40 346.21 1.84 4.05 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 22 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 131 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 190,000.00 JANE 06/03/27 93.99 178,588.98 13,488.48 (885.77) 2.01 4.19 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE) 89788MAC6 200,000.00 GoldmanS 06/03/27 93.99 187,988.40 24,482.40 4,018.47 2.01 4.19 DTD 08/03/2020 1.125%08/03/2027 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TK33 450,000.00 Citigrou 100.83 453,737.70 8,539.20 5,888.15 2.07 4.20 DTD 09/20/2022 4.550%09/20/2027 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE) 882508BC7 400,000.00 MorganSt 08/03/27 97.55 390,200.00 14,768.00 1,926.90 2.16 4.04 DTD 11/03/2017 2.900%11/03/2027 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) 20030NEA5 425,000.00 TD Secur 10/15/27 102.62 436,115.03 (7,057.97) 2,280.49 2.15 4.21 DTD 11/07/2022 5.350%11/15/2027 AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE) 023135CP9 300,000.00 RBC Capi 11/01/27 101.32 303,963.30 1,272.30 2,680.42 2.21 4.00 DTD 12/01/2022 4.550%12/01/2027 JOHNSON&JOHNSON (CALLABLE) 478160DH4 90,000.00 JPMorgan 02/01/28 101.68 91,510.11 1,562.31 1,556.36 2.41 3.88 DTD 02/20/2025 4.550%03/01/2028 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE) 61747YFP5 235,000.00 JANE 04/13/27 102.21 240,189.04 3,952.94 4,415.43 1.66 4.75 DTD 04/19/2024 5.652%04/13/2028 JPMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEE2 130,000.00 MAXE 04/22/27 102.07 132,685.02 2,306.72 2,447.00 1.70 4.73 DTD 04/22/2024 5.571%04/22/2028 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 (CALLABLE) 17252MAR1 185,000.00 MUFG 04/01/28 100.22 185,414.59 651.39 638.96 2.59 4.14 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2028 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BHO 425,000.00 GoldmanS 04/04/28 100.79 428,360.90 (867.85) 983.13 2.59 4.00 DTD 05/04/2023 4.250%05/04/2028 CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE) 231021AY2 30,000.00 JPMorgan 04/09/28 100.44 30,133.41 154.41 153.44 2.61 4.10 DTD 05/09/2025 4.250%05/09/2028 META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE) 30303M81-9 450,000.00 JPMorgan 04/15/28 101.82 458,194.50 7,357.50 7,708.29 2.61 3.96 DTD 05/03/2023 4.600%05/15/2028 MERCK&CO INC (CALLABLE) 58933YBH7 475,000.00 Citigrou 04/17/28 100.44 477,081.45 5,534.70 4,074.52 2.64 3.93 DTD 05/17/2023 4.050%05/17/2028 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 460,000.00 HSBC 100.79 463,617.90 3,581.10 3,581.85 2.70 4.40 DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WEM9 300,000.00 GoldmanS 102.01 306,044.10 7,400.10 6,864.04 2.71 4.43 DTD 07/07/2023 5.125%07/07/2028 BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE) 05565ECE3 450,000.00 Barclays 07/11/28 101.83 458,242.20 13,309.20 11,405.54 2.76 4.45 DTD 08/11/2023 5.050%08/11/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 23 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page132 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Corporate CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 575,000.00 GoldmanS 08/29/28 104.55 601,141.23 28,993.23 28,088.24 2.86 4.32 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803%09/29/2028 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY 21688ABC5 370,000.00 MIZU 101.95 377,213.15 6,695.15 6,834.61 3.15 4.25 DTD 01/09/2024 4.800%01/09/2029 ]PMORGAN CHASE&CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEU6 200,000.00 JPMorgan 01/24/28 101.30 202,605.20 2,605.20 2,605.20 2.35 4.62 DTD 01/24/2025 4.915%01/24/2029 CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE) 17275RBR2 270,000.00 Citigrou 01/26/29 102.46 276,629.58 6,724.08 6,700.17 3.23 4.16 DTD 02/26/2024 4.850%02/26/2029 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 14913UA03 95,000.00 BOFAML 100.74 95,702.72 960.17 918.94 3.68 4.21 DTD 08/16/2024 4.375%08/16/2029 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) 00724PA18 460,000.00 BOFAML 12/17/29 103.34 475,355.26 16,059.06 16,000.89 3.93 4.19 DTD 01/17/2025 4.950%01/17/2030 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) 63743HFX5 110,000.00 RBC Capi 01/07/30 102.27 112,501.07 2,669.37 2,657.13 3.98 4.44 DTD 02/07/2025 4.950%02/07/2030 PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) 713448GB8 250,000.00 UBSS 01/07/30 101.83 254,565.00 5,995.00 5,893.26 4.02 4.20 DTD 02/07/2025 4.600%02/07/2030 HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE) 427866BL1 300,000.00 TD Secur 01/24/30 101.97 305,911.50 4,990.50 5,048.97 4.05 4.33 DTD 02/24/2025 4.750%02/24/2030 MARS INC (CALLABLE) 571676AY1 145,000.00 BOFAML 02/01/30 101.28 146,862.09 2,018.69 2,010.13 4.06 4.53 DTD 03/12/2025 4.800%03/01/2030 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE) 857477DB6 145,000.00 MorganSt 03/24/30 101.84 147,664.67 2,664.67 2,664.67 4.20 4.44 DTD 04/24/2025 4.834%04/24/2030 WALMART INC (CALLABLE) 931142FN8 165,000.00 BOFAML 03/28/30 101.11 166,826.88 2,112.33 2,103.20 4.26 4.13 DTD 04/28/2025 4.350%04/28/2030 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 450,000.00 JANE 01/30/30 92.01 414,058.05 1,309.05 1,230.11 4.43 4.30 DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE) 194162ATO 185,000.00 Citigrou 04/01/30 100.38 185,707.81 805.86 802.36 4.28 4.15 DTD 05/02/2025 4.200%05/01/2030 NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE) 637639AC8 475,000.00 BOFAML 04/20/30 101.67 482,945.33 8,239.83 8,232.50 4.28 4.34 DTD 05/20/2025 4.700%05/20/2030 CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBP2 250,000.00 Citigrou 04/29/30 101.90 254,745.75 4,745.75 4,745.75 4.28 4.51 DTD 05/29/2025 4.914%05/29/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 14,490,000.00 14,513,455.74 236,547.89 131,254.90 2.44 4.29 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 24 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page133 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Certificate of Deposit MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NEW ACC 99.68 244,220.90 (779.10) (779.10) 0.08 4.64 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 638730P65 400,000.00 WeIlsFar 101.77 407,067.20 7,067.20 7,067.20 1.14 4.13 DTD 09/20/2023 5.610%09/18/2026 CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY 22536DWD6 590,000.00 CRAG 100.81 594,754.22 4,754.22 4,754.22 1.51 4.19 DTD 02/05/2024 4.760%02/01/2027 Security Type Sub-Total 1,235,000.00 1,246,042.32 11,042.32 11,042.32 1.11 4.26 WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) 9498816D4 875,000.00 BOFAML 07/07/26 101.27 886,085.38 11,610.38 11,278.24 0.97 4.29 DTD 08/09/2023 5.450%08/07/2026 Security Type Sub-Total 875,000.00 886,085.38 11,610.38 11,278.24 0.97 4.29 Asset-Backed Security HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 10,113.55 BOFAML 99.83 10,096.63 (16.53) (16.81) 0.07 4.42 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 1.847.36 BNPPSA 99.86 1,844.74 (2.46) (2.58) 0.04 4.59 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 269,512.85 JPMorgan 100.13 269,867.52 375.78 368.68 0.35 4.55 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RAB2 34,671.06 MIZU 100.06 34,690.61 22.26 21.09 0.12 4.52 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 120,000.00 MIZU 100.78 120,941.76 966.12 957.32 0.63 4.67 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 75,000.00 JPMorgan 101.06 75,796.42 809.63 805.22 0.88 4.44 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 350,000.00 WeIlsFar 101.73 356,068.30 2,007.75 2,390.68 1.64 4.28 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 TACT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 240,000.00 MUFG 100.94 242,256.24 2,256.38 2,256.24 1.30 4.19 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 200,000.00 Barclays 100.49 200,986.60 1,001.24 998.68 1.59 4.16 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 25 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page134 Pfm asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Asset-Backed Security BACCT 2024-Al A 05522RD34 500,000.00 BOFAML 101.47 507,351.50 7,379.55 7,372.61 1.75 4.15 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 500,000.00 BOFAML 100.22 501,112.00 3,182.31 2,996.26 1.43 4.25 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 345,000.00 Citigrou 101.16 349,011.66 4,027.32 4,024.34 1.91 4.11 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 160,000.00 MIZU 100.28 160,445.28 476.10 471.79 1.36 4.25 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 375,000.00 Barclays 100.73 377,741.25 2,754.00 2,752.55 2.00 4.19 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 295,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.85 297,494.52 2,523.58 2,520.59 1.81 4.15 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 125,000.00 JPMorgan 100.19 125,232.25 246.21 245.49 2.15 4.12 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 280,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.46 281,280.16 1,321.77 1,316.30 2.14 4.13 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 455,000.00 SGAS 100.29 456,319.05 1,363.28 1,359.84 2.04 4.37 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 BAAT 2025-1A A3 05594BAD8 85,000.00 BOFAML 100.45 85,379.78 385.64 385.20 1.96 4.18 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 265,000.00 SGAS 101.31 268,469.12 3,525.49 3,520.13 1.68 4.09 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 VZMT 2025-3 AlA 92348KDY6 455,000.00 BOFAML 100.43 456,951.50 1,971.06 1,968.88 2.13 4.40 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 AMXCA 2025-2 A 02582JKP4 415,000.00 RBC Capi 100.60 417,476.72 2,484.23 2,483.90 2.58 4.13 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 100,000.00 TD Secur 100.53 100,525.40 540.12 539.67 2.14 4.09 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 WFCIT 2025-Al A 92970OA34 545,000.00 WeIlsFar 100.77 549,186.15 4,195.20 4,193.32 2.65 4.12 DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 Security Type Sub-Total 6,201,144.82 6,246,525.16 43,796.03 43,929.39 1.82 4.23 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 26 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 135 pfrn asset management Managed Account Fair Market Value &Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt Managed Account Sub-Total 65,504,782.94 64,870,620.94 1,261,130.02 516,247.90 2.50 4.01 Securities Sub-Total $65,504,782.94 $64,870,620.94 $1,261,130.02 $516,247.90 2.50 4.01% Accrued Interest $454,596.34 Total Investments $65,325,217.28 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 27 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 136 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 05/28/25 06/03/25 HSBC USA INC 40428HR95 460,000.00 (460,036.80) 0.00 (460,036.80) DTD 06/03/2025 4.650%06/03/2028 05/30/25 06/04/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFCO 350,000.00 (332,705.08) (3,147.10) (335,852.18) DTD 08/01/2022 2.625%07/31/2029 06/03/25 06/10/25 WFCIT 2025-Al A 929700AJ4 545,000.00 (544,990.95) 0.00 (544,990.95) DTD 06/10/2025 4.340%05/15/2030 06/11/25 06/12/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CKEO 300,000.00 (301,277.34) (3,083.56) (304,360.90) DTD 03/15/2024 4.250%03/15/2027 06/11/25 06/12/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CHF1 600,000.00 (591,867.19) (737.70) (592,604.89) DTD 05/31/2023 3.750%05/31/2030 06/12/25 06/13/25 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3130B6R24 620,000.00 (619,175.40) 0.00 (619,175.40) DTD 06/13/2025 3.875%06/04/2027 06/26/25 06/27/25 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) 09247XA04 450,000.00 (412,749.00) (1,710.00) (414,459.00) DTD 01/27/2020 2.400%04/30/2030 Transaction Type Sub-Total 3,325,000.00 (3,262,801.76) (8,678.36) (3,271,480.12) 06/01/25 06/01/25 AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE) 023135CP9 0.00 6,825.00 6,825.00 DTD 12/01/2022 4.550%12/01/2027 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K539 A2 3137HKXJS 0.00 771.75 771.75 DTD 04/01/2025 4.410%01/01/2030 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS KJ46 Al 3137HAD45 0.00 2,372.85 2,372.85 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K508 A2 3137HAO74 0.00 2,172.50 2,172.50 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740%08/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K530 A2 3137HHJL6 0.00 2,376.03 2,376.03 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792%09/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 0.00 2,325.00 2,325.00 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650%08/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 0.00 1,104.90 1,104.90 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572%12/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 0.00 929.32 929.32 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069%10/01/2028 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 28 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page137 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K520 A2 3137HCKV3 0.00 1,295.00 1,295.00 DTD 04/01/2024 5.180%03/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 0.00 1,296.00 1,296.00 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860%10/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 0.00 2,409.50 2,409.50 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819%06/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K067 A2 3137FAWS3 0.00 931.58 931.58 DTD 09/01/2017 3.194%07/01/2027 06/01/25 06/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2 313613ODE6 0.00 2,001.13 2,001.13 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K062 A2 3137BUX60 0.00 881.69 881.69 DTD 02/01/2017 3.413%12/01/2026 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K527 A2 3137HFF59 0.00 1,635.54 1,635.54 DTD 08/01/2024 4.618%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 0.00 2,082.21 2,082.21 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K528 A2 3137HFNZ4 0.00 807.68 807.68 DTD 09/01/2024 4.508%07/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 0.00 1,437.30 1,437.30 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791%09/01/2029 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K537 A2 3137HKPF5 0.00 1,329.00 1,329.00 DTD 03/01/2025 4.430%02/01/2030 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 0.00 1,818.75 1,818.75 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850%09/01/2028 06/02/25 06/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 240.19 240.19 DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% -- 06/09/25 06/09/25 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY 63254ABE7 0.00 7,810.00 7,810.00 DTD 06/09/2022 3.905%06/09/2027 06/15/25 06/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3 437921AD1 0.00 533.16 533.16 DTD 05/08/2025 4.150%10/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3 34535KADO 0.00 1,687.29 1,687.29 DTD 03/25/2025 4.450%10/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RA132 0.00 193.32 193.32 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 29 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 138 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/15/25 06/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A 05522RDJ4 0.00 2,054.17 2,054.17 DTD 06/13/2024 4.930%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A 02582JKP4 0.00 1,578.84 1,578.84 DTD 05/13/2025 4.280%04/15/2030 06/15/25 06/15/25 HART 2024-C A3 448976AD2 0.00 735.00 735.00 DTD 10/16/2024 4.410%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 0.00 30.18 30.18 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 06/15/25 06/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3 65480MAD5 0.00 593.00 593.00 DTD 10/25/2023 5.930%03/15/2028 06/15/25 06/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3 58773DAD6 0.00 1,055.58 1,055.58 DTD 01/23/2025 4.780%12/17/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3 50117DACO 0.00 1,534.17 1,534.17 DTD 06/25/2024 5.260%11/15/2028 06/15/25 06/15/25 TACIT 2024-C A3 892370AD2 0.00 976.00 976.00 DTD 07/30/2024 4.880%03/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3 43816DAC9 0.00 1,804.17 1,804.17 DTD 10/24/2024 4.330%05/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A 02589BAEO 0.00 1,336.88 1,336.88 DTD 07/23/2024 4.650%07/15/2029 06/15/25 06/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A 929700AE5 0.00 1,001.00 1,001.00 DTD 10/24/2024 4.290%10/15/2029 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3 38014AAD3 0.00 586.67 586.67 DTD 10/16/2024 4.400%08/16/2029 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 0.00 4.24 4.24 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 0.00 380.44 380.44 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280%04/16/2030 06/18/25 06/18/25 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TJK2 0.00 2,025.00 2,025.00 DTD 06/18/2021 1.125%06/18/2026 06/20/25 06/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 AIA 92348KDY6 0.00 1,710.04 1,710.04 DTD 03/31/2025 4.510%03/20/2030 06/20/25 06/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3 05594BAD8 0.00 308.13 308.13 DTD 05/12/2025 4.350%11/20/2029 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 30 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 139 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/20/25 06/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3 92868MAD1 0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25 DTD 03/25/2025 4.500%08/20/2029 06/21/25 06/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3 438123AC5 0.00 354.38 354.38 DTD 11/08/2023 5.670%06/21/2028 06/21/25 06/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 0.00 1,247.30 1,247.30 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 06/25/25 06/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3 096924AD7 0.00 1,121.00 1,121.00 DTD 02/12/2025 4.560%09/25/2029 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCH2 O.00 4,843.75 4,843.75 DTD 06/30/2021 1.250%06/30/2028 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CJR3 0.00 29,531.25 29,531.25 DTD 01/02/2024 3.750%12/31/2028 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CEV9 0.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 DTD 06/30/2022 3.250%06/30/2029 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CCJ8 0.00 4,921.88 4,921.88 DTD 06/30/2021 0.875%06/30/2026 06/30/25 06/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 0.00 114.45 114.45 DTD 07/30/2020 0.550%07/30/2025 06/30/25 06/30/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CMDO 0.00 23,296.88 23,296.88 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375%12/31/2029 Transaction Type Sub-Total 0.00 144,817.34 144,817.34 06/01/25 06/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136BODE6 35.21 35.21 0.00 35.21 1.32 0.84 DTD 07/01/2023 4.190%07/01/2028 06/01/25 06/25/25 FHMS KJ46 Al 3137HAD45 511.68 511.68 0.00 511.68 0.01 0.01 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777%06/01/2028 06/15/25 06/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A 98164RAB2 11,266.01 11,266.01 0.00 11,266.01 0.88 0.51 DTD 02/14/2024 5.050%04/15/2027 06/15/25 06/15/25 HART 2022-A A3 448977ADO 6,198.40 6,198.40 0.00 6,198.40 0.24 0.07 DTD 03/16/2022 2.220%10/15/2026 06/16/25 06/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 380146AC4 2,193.85 2,193.85 0.00 2,193.85 0.19 0.06 DTD 01/19/2022 1.260%11/16/2026 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 31 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page140 Pfm asset management Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - Transaction Type Principal Accrued Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total Cost Amort Cost Method 06/21/25, 06/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2 43813YAB8 36,573.96 36,573.96 0.00 36,573.96 2.87 1.93 DTD 08/21/2024 4.890%02/22/2027 Transaction Type Sub-Total 56,779.11 56,779.11 0.00 56,779.11 5.51 3.42 05/30/25 06/04/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 38143U8H7 165,000.00 164,066.10 1,701.56 165,767.66 (19,504.65) (2,896.57) FIFO (CALLABLE) DTD 02/25/2016 3.750%02/25/2026 05/30/25 06/04/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 38143U8H7 175,000.00 174,009.50 1,804.69 175,814.19 (885.50) (970.58) FIFO (CALLABLE) DTD 02/25/2016 3.750%02/25/2026 06/03/25 06/04/25 AMXCA 2023-1 A 025821JZ4 400,000.00 401,609.38 1,028.11 402,637.49 2,484.38 2,150.71 FIFO DTD 06/14/2023 4.870%05/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 AMXCA 2023-1 A 025821JZ4 515,000.00 517,072.07 1,323.69 518,395.76 2,534.77 2,354.70 FIFO DTD 06/14/2023 4.870%05/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 BACCT 2023-Al Al 05522RDGO 650,000.00 652,132.81 1,643.24 653,776.05 4,265.62 3,435.58 FIFO DTD 06/16/2023 4.790%05/15/2028 06/03/25 06/04/25 DCENT 2023-A2 A 254683CZ6 625,000.00 628,149.41 1,626.22 629,775.63 2,856.44 2,968.52 FIFO DTD 06/28/2023 4.930%06/15/2028 06/26/25 06/27/25 US TREASURY N/B 91282CFM8 500,000.00 504,316.41 4,959.02 509,275.43 (9,199.22) (2,626.55) FIFO DTD 09/30/2022 4.125%09/30/2027 Transaction Type Sub-Total 3,030,000.00 3,041,355.68 14,086.53 3,055,442.21 (17,448.16) 4,415.81 Managed Account Sub-Total (164,666.97) 150,225.51 (14,441.46) (17,442.65) 4,419.23 Total Security Transactions ($164,666.97) $150,225.51 ($14,441.46) ($17,442.65) $4,419.23 PFM Asset Management,a division of Account Page 32 U.S.Bancorp Asset Management,Inc. Page 141 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 �' DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue of$1,139,429.67 Awarded by the California Governor's Office of Volunteers (CalVol) for FY25-26; and Authorization to Appropriate $1,139,429.67 in Revenue and Apply a Negative Expenditure Appropriation to Align with the Actual Grant Award for the Approved Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce Program. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept grant revenue in the amount of $1,139,429.67 from the California Governor's Office of Volunteers (CalVol) for the FY25-26 Grant Funding cycle and appropriate these funds to the Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce Program (CITY). BACKGROUND: California Volunteers, authorized by the federal Serve America Act and Executive Order S-24-06, engages Californians in service, volunteering, and civic action to tackle statewide challenges. The CaliforniansForAll Youth Workforce Program, administered by California Volunteers, partners with cities to boost youth employment and skills in areas such as climate action, food security, and COVID- 19 recovery. The City of Rancho Cucamonga successfully applied for a second round of grant funding 2025 Youth Service Corps grant from the State of California Governor's Office. This $1,139,429.67 grant will fund the "Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce" program in collaboration with the Southern California Mountains Foundation Urban Conservation Corps of the Inland Empire (UCC). Program funding is aimed at enhancing the city's capacity to achieve long-term climate goals. The program targets an additional 28 underserved youth from the Inland Empire, providing training in urban forestry and fire service through hands-on field experience. Participants will engage in fuel reduction, trail maintenance, brush removal, and vegetation management in critical areas, thereby enhancing community safety and mitigating fire risks. They will acquire industry certifications and develop skills supporting future careers in public service and environmental conservation. ANALYSIS: In line with Rancho Cucamonga's strategic plans for inclusivity, safety, and resilience—including the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Climate Action Plan, and Community Wildfire Protection Plan— Page142 the "Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce" program strengthens the city's ability to address climate challenges. Program activities will focus on high-need locations within the city and Wildland Urban Interface, promoting safe community access and reducing fire risks. The initiative aims to equip participants with valuable skills, improving their employability in urban forestry and vegetation management. The Climate Ready Workforce program is committed to: 1. Strengthening Rancho Cucamonga's capacity to meet long-term climate-related strategic goals outlined in the city's plans. 2. Addressing public sector workforce shortages in urban forestry and fire service. 3. Developing career pathways for an additional 28 underserved youth from the Inland Empire through training in urban forestry and vegetation fuels management. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff recommends accepting the $1,139,429.67 grant into Fund 274 — State Grants Fund and adjusting the budget to reflect the actual award amount. This includes appropriating $1,139,429.67 in revenue and applying a negative appropriation of$512,640.33 to expenditures to reduce the previously appropriated amount of$1,652,070, bringing total expenditure authority in line with the actual grant award. Type Description Account Amount Revenue State Grants F274ICC32214501IRC5101 $1,139,429.67 Expenditure Contract Services — F2741CC322166001SC2106 -$512,640.33 Professional Services COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This initiative aligns with the Council's vision by promoting a sustainable city and fostering a safe and healthy community for all residents. ATTACHMENTS: None Page143 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Deposit Agreement with DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Brightline West for Deposit of Funds in the Amount of $1,000,000 as Security for Future Relocation Costs Under a Separate Joint Use Agreement Between Brightline West, Southern California Edison, and the City. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council 1. Approve the attached Deposit Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 2. Authorize the Creation of the High-Speed Rail Utility Relocation Fund; and 3. Authorize the deposit into the High-Speed Rail Utility Relocation Fund and investment of $1,000,000 pursuant to the terms of the Deposit Agreement BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been working with Brightline West (BLW) and the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) since 2020 to bring high-speed passenger rail from Las Vegas, Nevada to Rancho Cucamonga, California. This first-in-the-nation 218-mile high-speed passenger rail line (over 186 mph)will begin/end in Las Vegas Nevada near the west end of the city, parallel the 15-freeway corridor, with stops in Apple Valley and Hesperia before reaching its other beginning/end at Cucamonga Station in the HART District of Rancho Cucamonga. BLW's station at Cucamonga Station is expected to be approximately 80,000 square feet with over 5,000 parking spaces for Brightline and Metrolink customers. BLW, which currently operates a private higher speed (but not "high-speed") commuter rail system in Florida, obtained all necessary approvals from the States of Nevada and California to locate in the freeway right- of-way, as well as the Federal Government Federal Railroad Administration for the appropriate National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) review and approval. Expected top speed of the zero-emission all electric train sets is between 186 mph and 200 mph and the entire trip should take approximately 2 hours. In Las Vegas the train station will be adjacent to The Strip and Interstate 15. In Rancho Cucamonga, the train station will be collocated with the existing Cucamonga Station for Metrolink (Los Angeles to San Bernardino) and with a transfer BLW passengers will have access to anywhere along the Metrolink line, including to downtown Redlands or Los Angeles, as well as direct access to Ontario International Airport through the SBCTA ONT Connector tunnel, or through the West Valley Connector to Victoria Gardens.Along with the train line, BLW will construct all stations including related parking facilities and terminal amenities. Page144 BLW's project is expected to generate more than $10 billion in economic impact across the two states, with over 35,000 construction jobs and 1,000 permanent jobs. The trains are fully electric with overhead catenary lines that use most of the power from emissions free sources and are built by Siemens here in the United States. Those same trains will remove over 400,000 tons of CO2 per year and reduce vehicle miles traveled by over 700,000,000 per year. At the same time, BLW together with Caltrans and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife will design and construct three wildlife crossings over the 15 freeway while improving more than 600 existing culverts and large-scale under-crossings of the 1-15 corridor. The BLW line will be among the safest in the United States with zero at-grade crossings, extensive safeguards to prevent trespassing in the 1-15 median, use of the European Train Control System which has an impeccable international high speed rail safety record, and grade separated crossovers for first responders and maintenance workers. Presently, approximately 50 million one-way trips are made annually between these two destinations with 85% of them by car or bus. Those trips can take anywhere from 4 — 6 hours depending upon traffic conditions. At full operations, Brightline West expects to attract approximately 22% of the market or up to 11 million one-way trips each year. Rancho Cucamonga expects to see approximately 4-6 million passengers through its station when the line opens in late 2028 and up to 10-11 million by the time ridership stabilizes in years 7-9. This will provide a significant reduction in GHG to both California and Nevada and improve the transportation experience for both freight and passengers who continue using the 15 freeway, thus benefitting SBCTA. The higher-amenity train experience residents and tourists have come to expect (and love) in South Florida will be offered along this route as well, including but not limited to free onboard Wi-Fi, fully ADA accessibility from station to train, a wide selection of food and beverage, checked luggage and hotel check-in services. Utility Design and Relocation The property currently serving as parking lots for the Metrolink commuter rail and Omnitrans local services at Cucamonga Station are currently encumbered with utility easements and associated infrastructure. The site has overhead electrical transmission and distribution lines and poles running in an east-west alignment through the site owned and operated by Southern California Edison (SCE). Because of the design and orientation of the station and parking structure, chosen by Brightline West, Southern California Edison was unwilling to allow their lines to be placed underground. Therefore, in order to develop a portion of the property for the BLW High-Speed Passenger Rail station and parking structure with the current design, these lines must be relocated. After an extensive iterative process involving, SCE, BLW, SBCTA, and City staff, it has been determined that the most viable route for relocation of the overhead electrical transmission infrastructure through the site involves a route that places the infrastructure in the City's right-of- way along Rochester Avenue, Jersey Boulevard, and White Oak Avenue. Attachment 1 depicts the existing and planned relocation routes. ANALYSIS: As mentioned above, the parcels owned jointly by the City and SBCTA that serve as parking facilities at Cucamonga Station are encumbered with utility easements in favor of SCE. As such, SCE requires that relocation of their infrastructure provides the same or greater level easement rights in the relocated location. While SCE has rights under its franchise agreement with the City to place and maintain their infrastructure in the City's right-of-way, franchise rights would not be equivalent or better than the rights currently enjoyed by SCE under the easements on the Cucamonga Station property. This difference is most evident when a future adjustment or relocation of SCE's infrastructure is needed to allow for City or development driven construction of City-owned infrastructure (e.g., road widening or storm drain). Under the franchise agreement, Page 2 Page 145 the cost for the required relocation would be borne by SCE. Under the current easements at Cucamonga Station, the City would be responsible as subordinate to the easement rights. SCE has agreed to proceed with the relocation subject to execution of a three-party Joint Use Agreement (JUA) by the City and BLW. The JUA is currently being drafted and will be presented for consideration by the City Council at a later date. In concept, the agreement would grant SCE superior rights for their relocated infrastructure in the relocated area and BLW would bear the costs for future City-initiated relocation requests. If BLW does not fund the relocation costs, the City would inherit the responsibility to fund the relocation. To ensure that funds are available for future relocations or adjustments without burdening the taxpayers of Rancho Cucamonga, should the City become responsible for a future relocation of the relocated SCE transmission infrastructure, BLW has agreed to place a deposit of$1,000,000 with the City as security against future relocation expenses. This deposit in and of itself is insufficient to cover a relocation, however, the parties anticipate if invested the deposit can earn significant interest income and that no utility relocation would be needed in the short to mid term future until the deposit had grown to a larger amount. The attached Deposit Agreement outlines the terms of the deposit and roles and responsibilities of each party. Key terms of the agreement include: • BLW will deposit $1,000,000 with the City prior to the City's execution of the JUA. • The City shall account for the funds in alignment with the City's policies. • Upon mutual agreement to terminate the agreement, but no later than 30 years from the date of the agreement, the City and BLW will equally divide (or as otherwise mutually agreed upon in an instruction letter) and release the funds on deposit (including accrued interest) for their individual discretionary use. • The City may use the funds on deposit (including accrued interest) to fund relocations under the JUA if, after notice specified in the Deposit Agreement, BLW has not made payment arrangements with SCE. Finally, under the Deposit Agreement the City will execute a JUA with SCE and BLW. within 30 days of deposit of funds under the subject agreement. Execution of the JUA is at the discretion of the City and would be a requirement of SCE to proceed with the relocation. Should the City decide not to execute the JUA, the Deposit Agreement would terminate, and the funds would be returned to BLW. In that event, SCE would not agree to relocate its lines, and the project itself might not move forward. FISCAL IMPACT: This item has no direct financial impact on the City. The purpose of the Deposit Agreement is to provide security against potential future relocation costs that the City would otherwise not incur. Once on deposit, the funds will be invested to maximize returns in a prudent manner. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Through the construction of a unique west coast multi-modal transit facility that links commuter rail with high-speed rail with the Ontario International Airport thereby reducing GHG and congestion while improving the transit experience, this project aligns with and helps advance City Council values to "intentionally anticipate and embrace the future", "relentlessly pursue improvement" and "promote a safe and healthy community." ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Utility Line Relocation Exhibit Attachment 2 - Deposit Agreement Page 3 Page146 Utility Line Relocation Exhibit ATTACHMENT 1 L9 '•_n:t I �t 0��� �m I ML Page147 ATTACHMENT 2 DEPOSIT AGREEMENT THIS DEPOSIT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made as of this day of , 2025, by and among DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Brightline West ("BLW") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, (the "City"). Defined terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract defined below, whether or not such terms are used before or after the definitions are set forth. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, BLW, the City and Southern California Edison Company, a corporation ("SCE") intend to enter into a Joint Use Agreement that has been negotiated between such parties ("Contract") pursuant to which SCE will agree to rearrange, relocate and reconstruct its Facilities within the New Location (as those terms are defined within the Contract); WHEREAS, in order to compensate the City for the perpetual relocation rights conferred to SCE under the Contract and the City's relinquishment of relocation rights associated with SCE's franchise within the City's right-of-way,BLW agrees to make a deposit in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) (the "Deposit") to cover any future use of the Joint Use Area by the City which would necessitate a rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal of any of SCE's Facilities then existing in the New Location; and WHEREAS,BLW and the City agree that the Deposit will be held on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is duly acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Before the City executes the Contract, the Deposit shall be delivered to the City by wire transfer pursuant to the City's wire instructions provided to BLW. City shall execute the Contract within thirty(30) days after the date that BLW delivers the Deposit to the City. If the City does not execute the Contract within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Deposit, then it will refund the Deposit to BLW and have no further obligation to execute the Contract, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to an extension of time for City to execute the Contract. 2. The Deposit shall be accounted for by City in accordance with City's accounting and investment policies (the "Account"). 3. (a) The City shall deliver or release the Deposit and any interest accrued thereon (the "Funds") to the City or BLW, as the case may be, as follows: (i) to BLW and the City, one-half each of the remaining Funds on that date mutually agreed between BLW and the City to terminate this Agreement,but in all events prior to thirty (30) years from the date hereof; or (ii) to the City or BLW as designated by an instruction letter jointly executed by both the City and BLW; or 1 Page 148 (iii) release from the Account an amount equal to the portion of the Funds required for the rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal of any of SCE's Facilities then existing in the New Location as required by Section 4 of the Contract,after the City has provided a notice under Section 4 of the Contract that the future use of the New Location by City necessitates a rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal of any of SCE's Facilities then existing in the New Location and BLW has not,in writing,confirmed its financial liability for the subject rearrangement,relocation, reconstruction or removal and has not made payment arrangements that are reasonably satisfactory to SCE and conform to SCE's project payment arrangement requirements for similar customer requested or initiated utility rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal in the time frame required by Section 4 of the Contract; provided that the City shall not be entitled to the Funds until more than five (5)business days after the City has given a copy of the City's demand to BLW. (b) During all times that the City holds the Deposit, and in accordance with Section 3.(a)(iii), City shall only use the Funds to pay for the rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal of any of SCE's Facilities because the future use of the New Location by City necessitates a rearrangement,relocation,reconstruction or removal of any of SCE's Facilities then existing in the New Location. 4. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by reputable overnight messenger. Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of(a) one business day following deposit or delivery with a nationally recognized overnight courier delivery charges prepaid, or (b) upon delivery or attempted delivery as shown on the return receipt if sent by certified mail, or if no delivery date is shown, the postmark thereon. If notice is received on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, it shall be deemed received on the next business day. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective parry;provided that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address,notices to such party shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice: City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Manager BLW: DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC 8329 W. Sunset Road, Suite 150 Las Vegas,NV 89113 With a copy to BLW's Legal Counsel At the BLW address above 5. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole benefit of the parties to it, and there are no third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, no other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 6. Except on subjects preempted by federal law, this Agreement and the rights of the parties shall be governed by California law. Nothing herein is meant to be or will be interpreted to be a waiver of principles of legal preemption or preclusion that may apply to BLW because of its status 2 Page 149 as a common carrier regulated by the federal government. Venue for any legal action between the parties related to this Agreement will be in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, California or the United States District Court, Central District of California. 7. Each and every provision of this Agreement is, and shall be construed to be, a separate and independent covenant and agreement. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof shall to any extent be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to circumstances other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected hereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforced to the extent permitted by law. 8. This Agreement, together with all attachments and exhibits hereto, and all agreements executed pursuant hereto, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between or among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 9. Whenever used herein, the singular number shall include the plural, and the use of any gender shall include all genders. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable between, and inure to the benefit of, the City and BLW, their successors or assigns. 10. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed as original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered via electronic mail in PDF format are acceptable. 11. Time is of the essence in every provision hereof in which time is a factor. 12. BLW hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City and any and all agents, employees, representatives, council members, board members, consultants, and officers of the City, from and against all losses, liabilities, claims, damages (including foreseeable or unforeseeable consequential damages),penalties, fines, forfeitures, costs and expenses (including all reasonable out of pocket litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees) and demands of any nature whatsoever,related directly or indirectly to,or arising out of or in connection with the validity of this Agreement or the Contract. [Signature Page Follows] 3 Page 150 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written. BLW: DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company By: Name: Sarah Watterson Title: President CITY: City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name: Title: Attest: 4 Page 151 NONgq I � RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRIC DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief Augie Barreda, Deputy Fire Chief Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of the Purchase of Eighteen Handheld Radios from Motorola Solutions, Inc. as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of $191,370. (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board authorize the single source purchase of eighteen (18) handheld radios and miscellaneous related equipment from Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $191,370. BACKGROUND: The fire service operates in unique and challenging environments. The life safety of firefighters and citizens depends on reliable, functional communication tools that work in the harshest and most hostile of environments. Similar to self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and personal protective equipment (PPE), handheld radios are essential components of firefighter survival. Firefighters often work with limited or no visibility and with extreme noise levels due to fire apparatus, saws, hose nozzle operations, etc. Fire conditions often require firefighters to crawl on their hands and knees or perform job functions while lying down. Gloves, SCBA, and other PPE restrict vision, hearing and the manual dexterity required to operate radio controls. Not being able to see or hear makes fireground communications challenging. During interior firefighting operations, firefighters use their handheld radios to communicate with each other to assess the status of incident operations or to request specific firefighting tactics. Firefighters also use their radios to communicate with company officers to inform them of conditions. Most importantly, firefighters depend on their radios to call a Mayday. Handheld radios allow firefighters inside to communicate with personnel on the outside who may have a better vantage point from which to assess conditions — the size and location of the fire and building conditions. Information from outside can prevent crews from advancing into dangerous conditions inside. In September 2003, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) released the document, Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Research Needs Pertaining to Firefighter Radio Communication Systems, where on page 13 it states: "It is critical for firefighters to communicate with one another within a structure and with units operating outside the structure, regardless of the building construction."The best way this can be done when crews are separated Page 152 or in trouble are through the use of a personal handheld radio. The Fire District uses Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios, which are the standard within the County and Region. They are a key component in maintaining interoperability with CONFIRE, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, all other County first responder agencies, Cal Fire, and the US Forest Service during Mutual and Automatic Aid. When the FCC agreed to restructure the 800MHz band- Nextel Sprint- part of the agreement was to exchange certain public safety radios that qualified. The radios issued as part of this re-banding are exclusively Motorola. The County of San Bernardino Information Services Department (ISD) is the administrator of this program. The Fire District has a contract with the County (ISD) for Monthly radio access and maintenance. County ISD solely maintains and programs Motorola radios. Motorola radios are the radios used on the 800 MHz trunking system infrastructure within our County and region. In October 2023, the Fire District began a multiphase replacement of the Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios. Phase One consisted of the purchase of 75 Motorola APX 8000 radios. These radios were distributed to fire personnel who have the potential of entering a structure under hazardous conditions and needed access to the enhanced safety features of the new radios. ANALYSIS: The Fire District is ready to move forward with Phase Two of the replacement of the Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios. This phase will include the purchase of 18 radios that will be placed on the Fire District's wildland apparatus and also build the Fire District's cache of radios needed for upstaffing additional fire apparatus during wildfires and weather-related events. The cost of purchasing 18 handheld radios and miscellaneous related equipment is $191,370. In order to provide continuity of operations and ensure the health and safety of Fire District personnel, Staff recommends utilizing a single source purchase directly with Motorola Solutions, Inc. to purchase the radios. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of replacement handheld radios was approved in the FY 2025-26 budget. A total of $340,000 was allocated in the Fire Protection Capital Fund under account F288 CC501 SC7002 P0117 (Capital Outlay — Equipment and Furnishings) for replacement of both 800 MHz radios and VHF radios. The total purchase price for the Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios will be $191,370. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item brings together portions of the Council's vision and core value by providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by ensuring our first responders have the resources and tools necessary to respond effectively during emergency situations. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — 800 MHz Radio Replacement Quote Page 2 Page 153 0 A6070HOLA SOLUTIONS QUOTE-3195629 Radio Project 2025 Billing Address: Quote Date:07/08/2025 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE Expiration Date:09/15/2025 DISTRICT Quote Created By: PO BOX 807 William Golden RANCHO CUCAMONGA, William.Golden@motorolasolutions.com CA 91729 US End Customer: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Summary: Any sales transaction resulting from Motorola's quote is based on and subject to the applicable Motorola Standard Terms and Conditions, notwithstanding terms and conditions on purchase orders or other Customer ordering documents. Motorola Standard Terms and Conditions are found at www.motorolasolutions.com/product-terms. Line# Item Number Description Qt Price Ext.Sale Price y List Price Sale APXT"^ 8000 Series APX8000XE 1 H91TGD9PW7AN PORTABLE RADIO APX 8000 ALL 18 $8,651.00 $6,315.23 $113,674.14 BAND MODEL 3.5 1a Q806CB ADD:ASTRO DIGITAL CAI 18 $607.00 $443.11 $7,975.98 OPERATION 1b Q361AN ADD: P25 9600 BAUD 18 $353.00 $257.69 $4,638.42 TRUNKING 1c QA02006AC PORTABLE RADIO ENH: 18 $942.00 $687.66 $12,377.88 APX8000XE RUGGED RADIO 1d QA05509AA DEL: DELETE UHF BAND 18 -$800.00 -$584.00 -$10,512.00 1e H38BS ADD: SMARTZONE OPERATION 18 $1,766.00 $1,289.18 $23,205.24 1f Q629AH SOFTWARE LICENSE ENH:AES 18 $560.00 $408.80 $7,358.40 ENCRYPTION AND ADP 1g QA05100AA EHN: STD 1 YR WARRANTY 18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 APPLIES 1 h QA01427AG ALT:APX8000/XE HOUSING 18 $30.00 $21.90 $394.20 GREEN 1i Q498AU SOFTWARE LICENSE ENH: 18 $871.00 $635.83 $11,444.94 ASTRO 25 OTAR W/ MULTIKEY 1j QA09113AB ADD: BASELINE RELEASE SW 18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 k G996AP ADD: PROGRAMMING OVER 18 $118.00 $86.14 $1,550.52 P25(OTAP) 11 QA05508AA DEL: DELETE VHF BAND 18 -$800.00 -$584.00 -$10,512.00 Any sales transaction following Motorola's quote is based on and subject to the terms and conditions of the valid and executed written contract between Customer and Motorola(the Underlying Agreement"")that authorizes Customer to purchase equipment and/or services or license software(collectively""Products"").If no Underlying Agreement exists between Motorola and Customer,then Motorola's Standard Terms of Use and Motorola's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Supply shall govern the purchase of the Products. Motorola Solutions,Inc.:500 West Monroe,United States-60661-#:36-1115800 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 Page 154 0 M07 0HOLA SOLUTIONS QUOTE-3195629 Radio Project 2025 Line# Item Number —ii .- . . Qty List Price Sale Price Ext. Sale Price 2 PMNN4504A PORTABLE RADIO BATTERY 18 $245.21 $179.00 $3,222.00 IMPRES 2 LI-ION UL2054 DIV2 R IP68 3400T 3 PMMN4107C PORTABLE RSM XE500 GREEN, 18 $636.00 $464.28 $8,357.04 IP68, NO KNOB 4 NNTN8860B CHARGER,SINGLE-UNIT, 10 $199.56 $145.68 $1,456.80 IMPRES 2,3A, 115VAC, US/NA Miscellaneous Items 5 NNTN8844B CHARGER, DESKTOP MULTI 1 $1,824.56 $1,331.93 $1,331.93 UNIT 6 W/DISPL,IMPRES 2 US Subtotal $241,045.94 Total Discount Amount $65,082.45 Estimated Tax $15,396.81 Grand Total $191 ,360.30(USD) Notes: Any sales transaction following Motorola's quote is based on and subject to the terms and conditions of the valid and executed written contract between Customer and Motorola(the ""Underlying Agreement"")that authorizes Customer to purchase equipment and/or services or license software(collectively""Products"").If no Underlying Agreement exists between go Motorola and Customer,then Motorola's Standard Terms of Use and Motorola's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Supply shall govern the purchase of the Products. Motorola Solutions,Inc.:500 West Monroe,United States-60661-#:36-1115800 Page 2 Page 155 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director SUBJECT: Consideration of Award of Contract to Landscape Structures Inc. in the Amount Not to Exceed $931,286.29 for the Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project/Parks Playground and Surfacing Replacements Program. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of contract to Landscape Structure Inc. in the amount, not to exceed $931,289.29, for the Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project/Parks Playground and Surfacing Replacements Program. BACKGROUND: The City's Major Projects and Programs Plan has identified needed improvements to the Mt. View Playground. The identified improvements for this program include: removal of existing playground structure, installation of new playground structure and installation of new playground safety surfacing. The new proposed design was the creative work of the Community Services Department team in collaboration with Public Works Services Department team. Please see proposed design pictured below. ANALYSIS: Sourcewell has awarded a formally bid agreement for playground design and installation to Landscape Structures Inc. The proposed agreement will address removal of existing playground equipment and installation of new playground equipment/safety surfacing. Based on the Sourcewell Contract No. 010521-LSI awarded to Landscape Structures Inc., total compensation for the Mt. View Park Playground Replacement Project is $931,286.29. Upon award the estimated project completion is 12-16 weeks. Staff recommends using the cooperative bidding process completed by Sourcewell to award the proposed agreement with Landscape Structures Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended award amount of $931,286.29 is included in the FY 25/26 budget and available in account F134 CC319 SC7003 2210; the recommended action will not have a fiscal impact. Page 156 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item advances the City Council's Core Values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Proposed Agreement I rI� t �J6 Mountain View Park appj __ srucmra' 119wf of Wcs-0•).10.202� Page 2 Page 157 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga l CONTRACT NUMBER 2025-108 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACT LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. FOR Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project AWARD DATE: August 20TH, 2025 ATTACHMENT 1 Page158 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �r RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project" PREPARED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT 8794 LION ST. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 (909) 477-2730 MARITZA MARTINEZ PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR 01 age TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................................1 INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR...........................................................................................................................5 A. PROPOSALS......................................................................................................................................................5 B. PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS,AND SITE OF WORK..................................................................................................5 C. COMPETENCY OF CONTRACTOR......................................................................................................................5 D. AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT.........................................................................................................6 E. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE....................................................................................................................................7 F. EQUIVALENT MATERIALS.................................................................................................................................7 CONTRACT.......................................................................................................................................................8 A. AGREEMENT....................................................................................................................................................8 B. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND...................................................................................................................14 C. PAYMENT BOND............................................................................................................................................15 D. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE.................................................................................17 E. MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND...............................................................................................................18 SPECIALPROVISIONS...........................................................................................................................................20 PART1.................................................................................................................................................................20 SECTION 1-GENERAL,TERMS, DEFINITIONS,ABBREVIATIONS,UNITS OF MEASURE,AND SYMBOLS...................20 SECTION 2-SCOPE OF THE WORK..........................................................................................................................22 SECTION 3-CONTROL OF THE WORK.....................................................................................................................24 SECTION 4-CONTROL OF MATERIALS.....................................................................................................................28 SECTION 5-LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES..........................................................................................30 SECTION 6-PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK....................................................................................37 SECTION 7-MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT.........................................................................................................40 SECTION 8-FACILITIES FOR AGENCY PERSONNEL..................................................................................................42 PART2.................................................................................................................................................................43 SECTION 206-MISCELLANEOUS METAL ITEMS......................................................................................................43 PART3.................................................................................................................................................................44 SECTION 300-REMOVALS AND EARTHWORK........................................................................................................44 PART4.................................................................................................................................................................46 SECTION 400-PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ...................................................................................................46 PART9.................................................................................................................................................................47 SECTION 900- PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENTAND SURFACING REMOVAL.......................................................47 SECTION 901- PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND SURFACING INSTALLATION...............................................47 APPENDICES.........................................................................................................................................................48 APPENDIX 1-CITY WORKING DAYS CALENDAR...................................................................................................49 APPENDIX 2-LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES PROPOSAL............................................................................................50 APPENDIX3-EQIUPMENT LIST............................................................................................................................51 APPENDIX4-PROJECT DRAWING.......................................................................................................................52 1 Page 160 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. As such, a copy of prevailing wage rates may be found at https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Prevailing-Wage.html. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all projects, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to 2 Page 161 eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class"A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of 3 Page162 Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In accordance with the requirements of Section 7-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). 4 Page163 INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR A. PROPOSALS SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR Corporation The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for the corporation in lieu the above; however, a Certified copy (including the original corporate seal) of a resolution of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so must also be provided to the City Clerk's office as part of the Bidder's response. Partnership The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The proposal must be signed by all partners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of a certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the partnership is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign. Joint Venture Proposal submitted as a joint venture must so state and be signed by each joint venture. Individual Proposal submitted by an individual must be signed by the bidder, unless a general power of attorney, not more than 60 days old, is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case the attorney in fact may sign for the individual. The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious business name. In addition, where a fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature. B. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND SITE OF WORK The plans and specifications to which the proposal forms refer are on file and open to inspection in the office of the City Engineer. C. COMPETENCY OF CONTRACTOR The Contractor shall be licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 3, of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California to do the type of work contemplated in the contract and shall be skilled and regularly engaged in the general class or type of work called for 5 Page164 under this contract. D. AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class"A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. Bonds The Contractor shall furnish a good and sufficient surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California in the sum equal to 100% of the total bid, conditioned for the Faithful Performance by the Contractor of all covenants, stipulations any agreements contained in said contract; an addition, the Contractor shall furnish a Labor and Materials Bond and a sum equal to 100% of the contract price, as required by the provisions of Section 9554 of the California Civil Code. Workers' Compensation Before commencing any work under the contract, the successful bidder must file with the Engineer a certificate by an insurance carrier authorized under the laws of the State to insure employers against liability for compensation under the "Worker's Compensation Insurance and Safety Act," stating that such bidder has taken out for the term for which the contract is to run, compensation insurance covering his full liability work or labor necessary to carry out the provisions of this contract, and an agreement to immediately notify said Engineer if said policy should lapse or be canceled. In the event that such policy should become inoperative at any time before the completion of the work, all work shall cease immediately until a new policy is obtained and any time so lost shall not entitle Contractor to any extension of time. Execution of Contract The Contract shall be signed by the successful bidder and returned together with the other required documents, within fifteen (15)days after the bidder has received notice that the contract has been awarded, unless extended by said City Council in writing. No proposal shall be considered binding upon the City until the execution of the contract. Failure to execute a contract and file acceptable documents as provided herein within fifteen (15) days from receipt of notice of award shall be just cause for the annulment of the award. In the event of failure to enter into such contract, the lowest bidder's security (cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond) shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Liquidated Damages and Working Days Attention is directed to the provisions of Section 6-9 of the Specifications. 6 Page 165 The Contractor shall pay to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the sum of$3,600 per day for each and every calendar day's delay in finishing the work in excess of 150 working days. E. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE Municipal Ordinances requires the issuance of a City Business License as a condition precedent to being engaged as a Contractor within the City. F. EQUIVALENT MATERIALS Attention is directed to the provisions of Section 4-6 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 7 Page166 CONTRACT A. AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the following agreement is made and entered into, in triplicate, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between Landscape Structures Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." WHEREAS, pursuant to the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the proposal of Contractor; and WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for the construction of "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project." NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project." Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with proposal prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specifications are incorporated herein by reference thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full herein. Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the entire contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT: The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within fifteen (15) days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the fifteen (15) days, and to complete his portion of the work within 150 working days from the date specified in the Notice to Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $3,600 for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract 8 Page167 until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at all time during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Workers Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work,the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract." b. For all operations of the Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) General Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $2,000,000 each person; $2,000,000 each accident. (2) General Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $1,000,000 each accident; $2,000,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury$1,000,000 each person; $2,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $1,000,000 each accident; $2,000,000 aggregate. (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $2,000,000 each person; $3,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - Property Damage $2,000,000 each accident. C. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph "b." shall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California. The insurance company shall have a policy holder rating of A or higher and a Financial Class VII or higher established by A.M. Best Company Rating Guide; (2) Name as additional insured the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the specification documents to be so included; (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the 9 Page 168 amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." (5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph "a."shall contain an endorsement which: (1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c. (2) hereof to be listed as additional insured in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph "b." by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days'written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs"a."and "b." hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insured and other provisions required herein. 5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775,the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. 10 Page 169 Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: a. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or b. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3, of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. 11 Page170 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City during the progress of the work or at any time before its completion and final acceptance. The Contractor will indemnify City against and will hold and save City harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, but excluding such actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and in connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The Contractor will promptly pay any judgment or award rendered against the Contractor or City covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder or reasonable settlement in lieu of judgment or award, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the City harmless therefrom. C. In the event City is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the project, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So much of the money due to the Contractor under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid. 10. NON-DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of age, disability, race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation or national origin of such persons, and every contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code. 12 Page 171 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor for furnishing the material and doing the prescribed work per the unit prices set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to be duly executed with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's License#: Date By: Signature Print Name &Title By: Signature Print Name &Title CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA By: BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Kim Sevy, City Clerk Date Contractor's Business Phone Number: Emergency Name and Phone Number at which Contractor can be reached at any time: 13 Page172 CONTRACT B. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: THAT as Principal, and as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called City, in the just and full amount of Nine Hundred Thirty-One Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-Six Dollars and Twenty- Nine Cents (Written) $931,286.29 (Figures) payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Given under our hands and sealed with our seal this_ day of , 20_. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, WHEREAS, the above-named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City, whereby said principal agrees to construct "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project" in accordance with the AGREEMENT dated , which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and performed, then this obligation is to be void; otherwise it will remain in full force and effect; PROVIDED, that for value received the undersigned stipulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item or items of performance required therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or time of performance required therein or thereunder. WITNESS our hands this_day of 20_. By: Title: Su rety: By: Individual _ Partnership _ Corporation Other, explain SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORMS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.). 14 Page173 Bond No.: C. PAYMENT BOND (Labor and Materials) KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that: WHEREAS the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (name of City) ("City") has awarded to (Name and address of Contractor) ("Principal"), a contract (the "Contract") for the work described as follows: "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project" WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Contract and the California Civil Code to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, materialmen, and other persons as provided by law. NOW THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and (Name and address of Surety) ("Surety") a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City in the penal sum of Nine Hundred Thirty-One Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-Six Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents ($931,286.29 ), this amount being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total contract price, in lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bounded Principal, his, her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Section 9100 of the California Civil Code, or any amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the Contract, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Principal and subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to work or labor performed under the Contract, the Surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the penal sum specified in this bond; otherwise, this obligation shall become null and void. 15 Page174 Payment Bond (continued) This bond shall insure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Section 9100 of the California Civil Code so as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon the bond. In case the suit is brought upon this bond, Surety further agrees to pay all court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in an amount fixed by the court. FURTHER, the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, addition or modification to the terms of the Contract, or of the work to be performed thereunder, or the specifications for the same, shall in any way affect its obligations under this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, addition, or modification to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the specifications thereunder. Surety hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2845 and 2849. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) identical counterparts of this instrument, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original hereof, have been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body. Date: "Principal" "Surety" By: By: Its Its By: By: Its Its (Seal) (Seal) Note: This bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. 16 Page 175 D. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE The Contractor shall execute the following form as required by the California Labor Code, Sections 1860 and 1861: 1 am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. Date (Contractor) By: (Signature) (Title) Attest: By: (Signature) (Title) 17 Page176 E. MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR "Mountain View Park Playground Replacement Project" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and (hereinafter designated as "Contractor") have entered into an agreement, Contract# whereby Contractor agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , 20_, and identified as project located is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Contractor is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement, guaranteeing all improvements free of all defects for a period of one (1)year after acceptance of by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, we the Contractor and as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City"), in the penal sum of Nine Hundred Thirty-One Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-Six Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents Dollars ($931,286.29) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bonded Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and same harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreements or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Contractor and surety above named on , 20 CONTRACTOR SURETY Name Name Address Address By: By: PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED 18 Page177 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION The work shall be done in accordance with the "Green Book" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction 2024 edition written and promulgated by the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association and the Southern District Associated General Contractors of California Joint Cooperative Committee, herein referred to as the "Standard Specifications." Subsequent amendments, supplements and/or additions shall also be considered, included herein. Copies are available from the publisher, Building News, Incorporated, 1612 So. Clementine Street, Anaheim, California, 92802, telephone (714) 517- 0970. The Standard Specifications set forth above will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this contract except as amended by the Plans, other contract documents, or the Special Provisions to follow. The section numbers of the following amendments coincide with those of said Standard Specifications. Only those sections requiring elaborations, amendments, specifying of options, or additions are referenced. 19 Page 178 SPECIAL PROVISIONS Amendments to "Standard Specifications", the City of Rancho Cucamonga Specifications for Public Works Construction PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1 — GENERAL, TERMS, DEFINITIONS, ABBREVIATIONS, UNITS OF MEASURE, AND SYMBOLS 1-2 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS The words and phrases defined below, appear in the Standard Specifications and in these Special Provisions, shall for the purpose of the Contract have the meaning hereinafter assigned to them. Agency: The City of Rancho Cucamonga. Board: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Engineer: The City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting personally or through agents or assistants duly authorized by him. The following shall be added: City: City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Major Bid Item: A single Contract item constituting 10 percent or more of the original Contract Price. Substantial Completion: Means the project can be used for its intended purpose as determined by the Engineer. 1-7 AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT The following subsection shall be added to subsection 1-7.1: 1-7.1.1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, demolishing and removing existing play equipment and rubber surfacing, and installing new playground equipment and resurfacing. 1-7.2 CONTRACT BONDS Delete the second sentence of the fourth paragraph and add the following: The "Performance Bond" shall remain in force until the acceptance of the Work by the 20 Page 179 Board. The bond shall be maintained by the Contractor in full force and effect until thirty five days after recordation of the Notice of Completion and acceptance of a"Maintenance Surety Bond" per Section 4-1.1. 21 Page180 SECTION 2 — SCOPE OF THE WORK 2-1 WORK TO BE DONE The following paragraphs shall be added following paragraph one: All work which is defective in its construction or deficient in any of the requirements of the Plans and Specifications shall be remedied or removed and replaced by the Contractor in an acceptable manner at his own expense. No compensation will be allowed for any work done beyond the lines and grades shown on the Plans or established by the Engineer. Upon failure on the part of the Contractor to comply with any order of the Engineer made under the provisions of this article, the Engineer and City may cause the defective work to be remedied or removed and replaced at the expense of the Contractor. Any unauthorized or defective work, defective material, or workmanship or any unfaithful or imperfect work that may be discovered before final acceptance of work by the board shall be corrected immediately with no extra charge even though it may have been overlooked in previous inspections and estimates or may have been caused due to failure to inspect the Work. 2-2 PERMITS The entire text of Subsection 2-2 is deleted and replaced with the following: Prior to the start of any work, the Contractor shall obtain the applicable City permits and plan for City inspections. The City will issue the permits at no charge to the Contractor. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall each obtain a City business license and shall be licensed in accordance with State Business and Professions Code. The Contractor shall also obtain all other permits, licenses, inspections, certificates, or authorizations required by any governing body or entity. The Contractor shall submit a Temporary Use Permit application to the Code Enforcement Office of the Planning Division of the City before utilizing a temporary construction storage site. The application shall state the site's intended use and include a map showing the location of the temporary storage area in relation to the project area along with proposed ingress and egress routes. Permit submittal information can be obtained from Code Enforcement, (909) 477-2720. If the City has obtained permits, licenses or other authorizations applicable to the work from other agencies, the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of said permits, licenses and other authorizations. Any charges for permit fees, licenses, inspection fees, certificates, insurance, authorizations, bonds that are required by any other governing body entity, utilities, railroads, agency shall be paid for by the Contractor. The actual costs of these charges to the Contractor shall be reimbursable by the City. 2-5 THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 2-5.1 GENERAL. The following sentence shall be added to the end of paragraph one: 22 Page 181 Such equipment and facilities shall meet all requirements of applicable ordinances and laws. 23 Page 182 SECTION 3— CONTROL OF THE WORK 3-4 AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD AND THE ENGINEER The following paragraphs shall be added following paragraph two: All authorized alterations affecting the requirements and information given on the approved plans shall be in writing. No changes shall be made on any plan or drawing after the same has been approved by the Engineer, except by direction of the Engineer in writing. Deviations from the approved plans, as may be required by the exigencies of construction, will be determined in all cases by the Engineer and authorized in writing. All instructions, rulings and decisions of the Engineer shall be in writing and binding on all parties unless formal protest is made as provided in the following paragraph: If the Contractor considers any work demanded of him to be outside the requirements of the contract, or if he considers any instruction, ruling or decision of the Inspector or Engineer to be unfair, he shall within ten (10) days after any such demand is made, or instruction, ruling or decision is given, file a written protest with the Engineer, stating clearly and in detail his objections and reasons therefore. Except for such protests and objections as are made of record in the manner and within the time above stated, the Contractor shall be deemed to have waived and does hereby waive all claims for extra work, damages and extensions of time on account of demands, instructions, rulings and decisions of the Engineer. Upon receipt of any such protest from the Contractor, the Engineer shall review the demand, instruction, ruling or decision objected to and shall promptly advise the Contractor, in writing, of his final decision, which shall be binding on all parties, unless within the ten days thereafter the Contractor shall file with the Board a formal protest against said decision of the Engineer. The Board shall consider and render a final decision on any such protest within thirty (30) days of receipt of same. 3-6 THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE The following paragraphs shall be added following paragraph one: The Contractor shall file with the Engineer the addresses and telephone numbers where he or his designated representative may be reached during hours when the work is not in progress, so that 24-hour, 7days-a-week contact can be maintained. Instructions and information given by the Engineer to the Contractor's authorized representative or at the address or telephone numbers filed in accordance with this section shall be considered as having been given to the Contractor. 3-7 CONTRACT DOCUMENT 3-7.1 GENERAL. Add the following after the third paragraph: 24 Page183 While it is believed that much of the information pertaining to conditions, which may affect the cost of the Work, will be shown on the Plans or indicated in the Specifications, the Agency does not warrant the completeness or accuracy of such information. The Contractor shall ascertain the existence of any conditions affecting the cost of the Work through a reasonable examination of the Work site prior to submitting the Bid. Existing improvements visible at the Work site, for which no specific disposition is made on the Plans, but which interfere with the completion of the Work, shall be removed and disposed of by the Contractor. The following paragraphs shall be added following the last paragraph: If the Contractor, either commencing work or in the course of the work, finds any discrepancy between the Specifications and the Plans, or between either, and the physical conditions at the site of the work, or finds any error or omission in any of the Plans, or Specifications or survey, he shall promptly notify the Engineer in writing of any such discrepancy, error, or omission. If the Contractor observes that any of the Plans or Specifications are at variance with any applicable law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, he shall promptly notify the Engineer in writing of such conflict. The Engineer on receipt of any such notice shall promptly investigate the circumstances and give appropriate instructions to the Contractor. Until such instructions are given, any work done by the Contractor, either directly or indirectly, after his discovery of such error, discrepancy, or conflict, will be at his own risk, and he shall bear all costs arising therefrom. 3-7.2 PRECEDENCE OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following paragraph shall be added following paragraph two: Should it appear that the work to be done or any matter relative thereto is not sufficiently detailed or explained by the specifications, the Contractor shall apply to the Engineer for such further explanation as may be necessary and shall conform to such explanation or interpretation as part of the Contract so far as may be consistent with the intent of the original plans and specifications. In the event of any discrepancy between any drawing and the figures written thereon, the figures shall be taken as correct. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTION SHALL BE ADDED: 3-7.3AS BUILT PLANS. The Contractor shall maintain a control set of Plans and Specifications on the project site at all times. All final locations determined in the field, and any deviations from the Plans and Specifications, shall be marked in red on this control set to show the as-built conditions. Upon completion of all work, the Contractor shall return the control set to the Engineer. Final payment will not be made until this requirement is met. 3-12 WORK SITE MAINTENANCE 3-12.3 NOISE CONTROL. The text of the subsection shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Noise generated from the Contractor's operations shall be controlled as specified by City 25 Page184 Ordinance. The use of excessively loud warning signals shall be avoided except in those cases required for the protection of personnel. 3-12.6.2 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs). The following is added after the first sentence in the second paragraph as follows: Best Management Practices relevant to the Work shall be in accordance with the current California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook as needed and/or otherwise directed by the Engineer. The contractor shall implement and maintain BMPs relevant to the scope of work. 3-12.6.3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). The following shall be added after the first paragraph: Projects subject to requirements of General Permit for Discharges associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order NO. 2009-0009-DWQ NPDES NO. CAS000002) The contractor shall follow all requirements in Order NO. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES NO. CAS000002. This General Permit regulates discharges of pollutants in storm water associated with construction activity (storm water discharges) to waters of the United States from construction sites that disturb one or more acres of land surface, or that are part of a common plan of development or sale that disturbs more than one acre of land surface. Contractor is not responsible for filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) for Permit coverage or a Notice of Termination (NOT) at project end. City staff will file a NOI for permit coverage and file a (NOT) at the end of the project. (See General Construction Storm Water Permit PDF: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/docs/constpermits/wqo 20 09 0009 complete.pdf). A requirement of the Permit is the discharger shall develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The discharger shall ensure that the SWPPP for all sites are developed and amended or revised by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Also, the discharger shall ensure that Best Management Practices (BMPs) within the SWPPP are implemented by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP). (See SWPPP Training Qualifications and Requirements PDF: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/docs/constpermits/wqo 20 09 0009 complete.pdf#page=49). The SWPPP shall be designed to address the following objectives: 1. All pollutants and their sources, including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion and all other activities associated with construction activity is controlled; 2. Where not otherwise required to be under a Regional Water Board permit, all non-storm water discharges are identified and either eliminated, controlled, or treated; 3. Site Best Management Practices (BMPs) are effective and result in the reduction or elimination of pollutants in storm water discharges and authorized non-storm water discharges from construction activity to the Best Available Technology Economically Achievable/Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology standard (BAT/BCT 26 Page 185 standard); 4. Calculations and design details as well as BMP controls for site run-on are complete and correct, and 5. To demonstrate compliance with requirements of this General Permit, the QSD shall include information in the SWPPP that supports the conclusions, selections, use, and maintenance of BMPs. 6. Stabilization BMPs installed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction is complete. 3-12.6.5. PAYMENT. The entire text of the subsection is deleted and replaced with the following: Unless otherwise specified in the bid, payment for implementation and maintenance of BMP's and SWPPP, and for dewatering shall be considered as included in the Contract Unit Price for each item in the Bid. 3-13 COMPLETION, ACCEPTANCE, AND WARRANTY. 3-13.1 COMPLETION. Delete the following from the last sentence: "...and to which liquidated damages will be computed." 3-13.3 WARRANTY. The first paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following: All work shall be warranted by the Contractor against defective workmanship and materials for a period of 1 year from the date of the acceptance of the work by the Board. The following shall be added to the end of the second paragraph: In addition, manufacturers' warranties, guarantees, instruction sheets and parts list, which are furnished with articles or materials incorporated in the work, shall be delivered to the Engineer before acceptance of the work by the City. The following subsection shall be added: 3-14 CLAIMS DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of Work, but shall proceed with the performance of the Work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The Disputed Work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute" and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all Disputed Work, claims and other disputed matters. 27 Page186 All claims arising out of or related to the Contract Documents or this Project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to the dispute procedures set forth in Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104, et seq. (Article 1.5), to the extent each is applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as through fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Section 20104 et seq. (if applicable), and must then adhere to Section 20104, et seq. and Section 9204, as applicable, pursuant to the definition of "claim" as individually defined therein. SECTION 4 - CONTROL OF MATERIALS 4-1 GENERAL. The following paragraphs shall be added following paragraph three: Used or secondhand materials, parts, and equipment may be used only if permitted by the specifications. The Contractor shall guarantee the entire work constructed by him under the contract to be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year following the date of acceptance of the work by the Board. The Contractor shall agree to make, at his own expense, any repairs or replacements made necessary by defects in materials or workmanship, which become evident within the warranty period. The Contractor shall further agree to indemnify and save harmless the City and Engineer, and their officers, agents and employees, against and from all claims and liability arising from damage and injury due to said defects. The Contractor shall make all repairs and replacements promptly upon receipt of written order from the Engineer. If the contractor fails to make the repairs and replacements promptly, the City may do the work and the Contractor and his surety shall be liable to the City for the cost of the work. The guarantee and conditions specified above shall be secured by a surety bond, which shall be delivered by the Contractor to the City prior to the date on which final payment is made to the Contractor. Said bond shall be in an approved form and executed by a surety company or companies satisfactory to the City, in the amount of ten percent(10%) of the final construction cost, or$1,000.00, whichever is greater. Said bond shall remain in force for the duration of the warranty period specified. 4-3 INSPECTION. 4-3.1 GENERAL. The text of Subsection 4-3.1 "General," shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Materials to be used in the work will be subject to inspection and tests by the Engineer or his designated representative. The Contractor shall furnish without charge such samples as may be required. The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer a list of his sources of materials and the locations at which such materials will be available for inspection. The list shall be furnished to the Engineer in sufficient time to permit inspecting and testing of their use. The Engineer may inspect, sample or test materials 28 Page187 at the source of supply or other locations, but such inspection, sampling or testing will not be undertaken until the Engineer is assured by the Contractor of the cooperation and assistance of both the Contractor and the supplier of the material. The Contractor shall assure that the Engineer or his authorized representative has free access at all times to the material to be inspected, sampled or tested. It is understood that such inspections and tests, if made at any point other than the point of incorporation in the work, in no way shall be considered as a guarantee of acceptance of such material nor of continued acceptance of material presumed to be similar to that upon which inspections and tests have been made, and that inspection and testing performed by the City shall not relieve the Contractor or his suppliers of responsibility for quality control. Manufacturers' warranties, guarantees, instruction sheets and parts lists, which are furnished with certain articles of materials incorporated in the work, shall be delivered to the Engineer before acceptance of the contracts. The Engineer may inspect the production of material, or the manufacture of products at the source of supply. Plant inspection, however, will not be undertaken until the Engineer is assured of the cooperation and assistance of both the Contractor and the material producers. The Engineer or his authorized representative shall have free entry at all times to such parts of the plant as concerns the manufacture or production of the materials. Adequate facilities shall be furnished free of charge to make the necessary inspection. The City assumes no obligation to inspect materials at the source of supply. 4-4 TESTING. The first paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following paragraphs: Before incorporation in the Work, the Contractor shall submit samples of materials, as the Engineer may require, at no cost to the Agency. The Contractor, at its expense, shall deliver the materials for testing to the place and at the time designated by the Engineer. Except as elsewhere specified, the City will bear the cost of testing material and/or workmanship, which meet or exceed the requirements indicated in the Standard Specifications and the Special Provisions. The cost of all other tests, including the retesting of material or workmanship that fails to pass the first test, shall be borne by the Contractor. The Contractor shall at his expense furnish the City, in triplicate, certified copies of all required factory and mill test reports. Any materials shipped by the Contractor from a factory or mill prior to having satisfactorily passed such testing and inspection by a representative of the City shall not be incorporated in the work, unless the Engineer shall have notified the Contractor, in writing, that such testing and inspection will not be required. 4-5 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. Add the following paragraphs at the end of the subsection: A Certificate of Compliance shall be furnished prior to the use of any materials for which these specifications or the special provisions require that such a certificate be furnished. In addition, when so authorized in these specifications or in the special provisions the Engineer may permit the use of certain materials or assemblies prior to sampling and 29 Page 188 testing if accompanied by a Certificate of Compliance. The certificate shall be signed by the manufacturer of the material or the manufacturer of assembled materials and shall state that the materials involved comply in all respects with the requirements of the specifications. A Certificate of Compliance shall not relieve the Contractor or responsibility for incorporating material in the work which conforms to the requirements of the plans and specifications, and any such material not conforming to such requirements will be subject to rejection whether in place or not. The City reserves the right to refuse to permit the use of material on the basis of a Certificate of Compliance. The form of the Certificate of Compliance and its disposition shall be as directed by the Engineer. SECTION 5— LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5-1 LAWS AND REGULATIONS The following paragraphs shall be added after paragraph one: If a discrepancy or inconsistency is discovered in the Plans, Drawings, Specifications or Contract for the work in relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, the Contractor shall forthwith report the same to the Engineer in writing. Per City Municipal Code Section 8.17.050/8.19.051, if the Contractor finds it necessary to make use of a refuse hauling service, only the City Franchised Hauler shall be used. Contact Burrtec Waste Industries at (909) 987-3717. 5-3 LABOR 5-3.2 PREVAILING WAGES. The following paragraphs shall be added following paragraph one: The Contractor, and all subcontractors, suppliers and vendors, shall comply with all City, State and Federal orders regarding affirmative action to ensure equal employment opportunities and fair employment practices. Failure to file any report due under said orders will result in suspension of progress payments. The Contractor shall ensure unlimited access to the job site for all equal employment opportunity compliance officers. Particular attention is called to the Labor Code of California, Part 7, Chapter I, Article 2, "Wages,"Article 3, "Working Hours." Attention is also directed to the provisions in Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. The entire text of the subsection is deleted and replaced with the following: 5-3.3 PAYROLL RECORDS. 30 Page 189 The Contractor and each of his subcontractors shall prepare payrolls on forms prescribed and in accordance with instructions furnished by the City. Within seven (7)days after the regular payment date of the payroll, the Contractor shall deliver to the City a certified and legible copy of each payroll. Such payroll shall be sworn to in accordance with the federal regulations made pursuant to the "Kick Back Statute." Such copies of payrolls shall be accompanied by substantial proof that all bills for services rendered and materials supplied have been duly paid for. The Contractor shall not carry on his payroll any person not employed by him. Employees of a subcontractor must be carried on the rolls of the employing subcontractor. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all new projects awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. The requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner will apply to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing, beginning January 1, 2016. Each Contractor or Subcontractor shall preserve his weekly payroll records for a period of three (3) years from the date of the acceptance of the work by the Board. The payroll records shall set out accurately and completely the name, address, social security number, occupational classification, and hourly wage rate of each employee, hours worked by him during the payroll period, and full weekly wages earned by him, any deductions made from such weekly wages, and the actual weekly wages paid to him. Such payroll records shall be made available at all times for inspection by the City or its authorized representatives. The Contractor agrees that, in case of underpayment of wages to any worker on the project under this contract by the Contractor or any subcontractor, the City shall withhold from the Contractor out of payments due, an amount sufficient to pay such worker the difference between the wages required to be paid under this contract and the wages actually paid such worker for the total number of hours worked and that the City may disburse such amount so withheld by it for and on account of the Contractor to the employee to whom such amount is due. The Contractor further agrees that the amount to be withheld pursuant to this paragraph may be in addition to the percentages to be retained by the City pursuant to other provisions of this contract. The following subsection shall be added: 5-3.6 JOB SITE NOTICE. Pursuant to the Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Section 1771.4(a)(2), the prime contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation. 5-4 INSURANCE The text of this entire subsection, except the last paragraph under subsection 5-4.1 and entire subsection 5-4.3 (Workers' Compensation Insurance), shall be deleted and replaced with the following in accordance to the City's "Contract Agreement": The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all 31 Page190 insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to the City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: 1 am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract." b. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: (1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 7-3 d.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph c. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. c. For all operations of the Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) .............................$2,000,000 each person; $2,000,000 each accident. (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) ......................$1,000,000 each accident; $2,000,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury ................................$1,000,000 each person; $2,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage ........................$1,000,000 each accident; $2,000,000 aggregate. (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury ...............................................$2,000,000 32 Page 191 each person; $3,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - Property Damage ........................................$2,000,000 each accident. d. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph c. shall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California. The insurance company shall have a policy holder rating of A or higher and a Financial Class VII or higher established by A.M. Best Company Rating Guide; (2) Name as additional insured the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the specification documents to be so included: (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." (5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and c. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. 5-7 SAFETY 5-7.2 SAFETY ORDERS. 5-7.2.3 PAYMENT. The entire text of the subsection is deleted and replaced with the following: Payment for performing all work necessary to provide safety measures or compliance with the provisions of the safety orders and all other laws, ordinances, and regulations shall be included in the various proposal items, except where separate items for excavation safety are provided or required by law. The following subsections shall be added: 5-7.9 ACCESS 33 Page192 5-7.9.1 GENERAL. The Contractor shall notify the occupants of all affected properties at least seventy-two hours prior to any temporary obstruction of access. Vehicular access to property line shall be maintained except as required for construction for a reasonable period of time. No overnight closure of any driveway will be allowed except as permitted by the Engineer. At least one twelve foot wide traffic lane shall be provided for each direction of travel on all streets at all times except as permitted by the Engineer. The traffic lanes shall be maintained on pavement, and shall remain unobstructed. Clearances from traffic lanes shall be five feet to the edge of any excavation and two feet to the face of any curb, pole, barricade, delineator, or other vertical obstruction. 5-7.10 WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL 5-7.10.1 GENERAL. The Contractor shall prepare a permit application for street closure and shall attach two copies of the proposed traffic control signing, barricading and/or detour routing. The permit application and accompanying attachments shall be reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. Upon the Traffic Engineer's approval, a no-fee Street Closure Permit shall be issued. No Street Closure, Lane Closure, Detour or other work requiring traffic control shall commence prior to issuance of said permit. The Contractor shall provide and install barricades, delineators, warning devices and construction signs in accordance with the current California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual (CJUTCM) published by the California Inter- Utility Coordinating Committee, the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH) and the current Caltrans Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. During adverse weather or unusual traffic or working conditions additional traffic devices shall be placed as directed by the Engineer. Should the Contractor fail to furnish a sufficient number of traffic and/or pedestrian safety devices, the City will place such necessary items and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for providing such devices in accordance with the following provisions: 1. Rental Rates A. Type I or II Barricades - $5.00 per barricade for the first day or any part thereof and $2.00 per barricade per day for each day thereafter or any part thereof. B. Type III Barricades - $15.00 per barricade for the first day or any part thereof and $5.00 per barricade per day for each day thereafter or any part thereof. C. Flashers - $5.00 per flasher for the first day or any part thereof and $2.00 per flasher per day for each day thereafter or any part thereof. D. Construction Signs - $5.00 per construction sign for the first day or any part thereof and $2.00 per construction sign per day for each day thereafter or any part thereof. 34 Page193 E. Cones - $1.00 per cone for each day or any part thereof. 2. Replacement Charges A. Type I or 11 Barricades-$20.00 per Type I or 11 barricade that is lost or damaged. B. Type III Barricades - $100.00 per Type III barricade that is lost or damaged. C. Flasher- $15.00 per flasher that is lost or damaged. D. Signs - $30.00 per sign that is lost or damaged. E. Cones - $5.00 per cone that is lost or damaged. 3. Service Charges A. Service trips between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. - $30.00 per hour, two hour minimum each service trip. B. Service trips between the hours of 3:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., or any time on Saturday, Sunday, or a City Holiday - $35.00 per hour, two hour minimum each service trip. Judgment as to adequate or sufficient barricading shall be that which is adequate or sufficient in the opinion of the Engineer. The Contractor shall relocate, preserve and maintain the visibility of all existing signs within the project limits which affect the flow of traffic, as directed by the Engineer. Any signs which are damaged or found to be missing during the course of construction shall be replaced by the Contractor at his expense as directed by the Engineer. All other signs that interfere with the course of work and are not necessary for the safe flow of traffic will be removed and replaced by the City. Traffic control signs include Stop Signs, Speed Limit, Parking Restriction and other regulatory signs. The Contractor shall not close any street within the City of Rancho Cucamonga without first obtaining the approval of the Engineer. Lane closures on four lane streets shall be restricted to between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM. 5-7.10.2 PAYMENT. Payment for preparing and performing all work necessary to provide work area traffic control or compliance with the provisions of the public safety and all other laws, ordinances, and regulations shall be included in the various bid items except where separate bid items for traffic control are provided or required by law. The following subsection shall be added: 5-7.11 PROTECTION OF PUBLIC. Whenever the construction occurs within a developed residential area and/or through a school site, the Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to protect the public, especially children, from the hazards of open excavations. Trenches shall either be 35 Page194 covered or adequately fenced at night and on weekends or whenever operations are not in actual process. Unusual conditions may arise on the project, which will require that immediate and unusual provision be made to protect the public from danger or loss or damage to life and property, due directly or indirectly to the progression of the work. It is part of the service required of the Contractor to make such provisions and to furnish such protection. The Contractor shall use such foresight and shall take such steps and precautions as his operations make necessary to protect the public from danger or damage, or loss of life or property, which would result from the interruption or contamination of public water supply, irrigation or other public service or from the failure of partly completed work. Whenever, in the opinion of the City, an emergency exists against which the Contractor has not taken sufficient precaution for the safety of the public or the protection of utilities or of adjacent structures or property or if immediate action shall be considered necessary in order to protect public or private personnel or property interest, or prevent likely loss of human life or damage on account of the operations under the contract, then and in that event the City may provide suitable protection to said interest by causing such work to be done and material to be furnished, as, in the opinion of the City may seem reasonable and necessary. The cost and expense of said labor and material together with the cost and expense of such repairs as may be deemed necessary shall be borne by the Contractor, and if he shall not pay said cost and expense upon presentation of the bills therefore, duly certified by the Engineer, then said costs and expense will be paid by the City and shall thereafter be deducted from any amounts due, or which may become due said Contractor. Failure of the City, however, to take such precautionary measure, shall not relieve the Contractor of his full responsibility for public safety. The following subsection shall be added: 5-7.12 STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN PUBLIC STREETS. Construction materials shall not be stored in streets, roads, or highways for more than 5 days after unloading. All materials or equipment not installed or used in construction within 5 days after unloading shall be stored elsewhere by the Contractor at their expense unless authorized additional storage time. Construction equipment shall not be stored at the work site before its actual use on the work or for more than 5 days after it is no longer needed. Time necessary for repair or assembly of equipment may be authorized by the Engineer. Excavated material, except that which is to be used as backfill in the adjacent trench, shall not be stored in public streets unless otherwise permitted. After placing backfill, all excess material shall be removed immediately from the site. The storage of materials is not permitted under bridges unless authorized. Authorization for material storage, temporary or permanent, is dependent upon adhering to setback 36 Page 195 limits and the fire hazard created by the material and associated risk to the integrity of the bridge. When authorized, materials stored under bridges must adhere to the following requirements: • Comply with all current applicable policies, laws, and regulations for the material being stored, including but not limited to: 0 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 710.405 o Title 8 Regulations o Stormwater permits • Appropriate measures must be taken to prevent unauthorized access to storage areas. • Maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the perimeter of any above ground column footing or pile cap. • Maintain a minimum setback of 20 feet from the face of any bridge column. • Maintain space to maneuver manlift vehicles under all bridge spans, hinges, and bent caps. Generally, access must be 12 feet wide and extend from a public street to the bridge member. • Maintain vertical clearance of at least 6 feet, measured from the lowest bridge member across the width of the bridge and the top of any storage material. • Drainage systems must not be obstructed. Maintain a minimum clearance of 3 feet from all drain outlets near the base of columns. The foregoing provisions are in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. The following subsection shall be added: SECTION 6— PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK 6-1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 6-1.1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Add the following paragraphs at the end of this subsection: Prior to the commencement of construction, arrangements will be made by the City for a meeting between the Contractor, the Engineer, Utility Representatives, designers and others as may be involved with the project. The purpose of this meeting is to coordinate the activities of the Contractor within the limits of this contract, review utility conflicts, review scheduling, discuss construction methods and clarify inspection procedures, etc. The Contractor shall submit at this meeting, for approval by the Engineer, the proposed construction schedule. The Contractor shall submit Progress Reports to the Engineer by the tenth day of each month. The report shall include an updated Construction Schedule. Any deviations from 37 Page196 the original schedule shall be explained. Progress payments will be withheld pending receipt of any outstanding reports. A two-week look ahead schedule must be submitted throughout the construction duration. Any changes in the baseline schedule shall be reflected on the two-week lookahead and discussed with the City. 6-3 TIME OF COMPLETION The following subsection shall be added: 6-3.3 Working Day. The Contractor's working day activities shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, excluding recognized City holidays and any City holiday closure period. See Appendix 1 "City Working Day Calendar". The working day shall encompass 8 hours from start to finish, including clean-up and securing the work site. Deviation from normal working hours will not be allowed without prior consent of the Engineer. Work near schools or located on major arterials may be subjected to additional working hour provisions. In the event work is allowed by the Engineer outside of the normal working hours, at the request of and for the benefit of the Contractor, inspection service fees may be levied against the Contractor at the current rate per hour, plus time and one-half and 15% administration fee, including travel time where applicable, with a minimum hourly charge for four (4) hours. The above charge may also be levied if inspection services are deemed necessary by the Engineer as a matter of public safety or to otherwise insure the quality of the work. 6-6 SUSPENSION OF THE WORK 6-6.1 GENERAL. Add the following paragraph following paragraph one: In the event a suspension of work is ordered because of failure on the part of the Contractor to carry out orders given or to perform any provisions of the work, such suspension of work shall not relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to complete the work within the time limit set forth herein and shall not be considered cause for extension of the time for completion, and further, such suspension of work shall not entitle the Contractor to any additional compensation. 6-9 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The last sentence of paragraph one shall be deleted and replaced with the following: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified in Item 3 of the Contract Agreement, as adjusted in accordance with Subsection 6-4, for completion of the Work, the Contractor shall pay to the Agency, or have withheld from monies due it, 38 Page197 the sum of$3,600 unless otherwise provided in the Specifications. The last paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Execution of the Contract shall constitute agreement by the Agency and the Contractor that $3,600 per day is the minimum value of the costs and actual damage caused by the failure of the Contractor to complete the Work within the allotted time. Such sum is liquidated damages and shall not be construed as a penalty and may be deducted from payments due the Contractor if such delay occurs. The following paragraph shall be added at the end of the subsection: The Engineer will set forth in writing the date of Substantial Completion of the work and this will be the date which liquidated damages will be computed. 39 Page 198 SECTION 7— MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 7-3 PAYMENT 7-3.1 GENERAL. The following paragraphs shall be added at the end of the subsection: Whenever the Contractor is required to perform work or furnish equipment, labor, tools and materials of any class for which no price is fixed in the Proposal, it shall be understood that such work, equipment, labor, tools and material shall be provided without extra charge, allowance, or direct payment of any kind. The cost of performing such work or furnishing such equipment, labor, tools and materials shall be included in the unit prices in the proposal and no additional compensation will be made, therefore. If any portion of the work done or materials furnished under the Contract shall prove defective or not in accordance with the specifications and contract drawings, and if the imperfection in the same shall not be of sufficient magnitude or importance to make the work dangerous or undesirable, the Engineer shall have the right and authority to retain the work instead of requiring it to be removed and reconstructed, but he shall make such deductions therefor in the payment due the Contractor as may be just and reasonable. 7-3.2 PARTIAL AND FINAL PAYMENT. Paragraph two shall be deleted and replaced with the following paragraph: On the workday following the designated closure date for preparation of progress estimates, the Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a written progress estimate based on the Contract Unit Prices or as provided for in Subsection 7-2 of the work that has been satisfactorily completed. The Engineer will review the estimate and approve it or notify the Contractor of any exceptions. The Engineer will determine and prepare the partial and final payments. If the Contractor fails to submit a written progress estimate, the Engineer will determine the quantity of work performed. No such progress estimate will be required, nor payment will be made when the total number of working days is twenty- five (25) or less or when the value of the work totals less than five hundred dollars ($500.00). Progress payment will, when properly completed as specified, be paid within 30 calendar days of submittal, and it is understood that any delay in the preparation, approval and payment of these demands will not constitute a breach of contract on the City. 7-3.3 DELIVERED MATERIALS. The text of this subsection shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Materials and equipment delivered but not incorporated into the work will not be included in the estimate for progress payment. 7-3.4 MOBILIZATION The text of this subsection shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Mobilization shall consist of all necessary work including but not limited to those necessary for the movement of personnel, equipment, supplies, securing all 40 Page 199 permits/approvals and licenses, paying all fess, preparatory work and operations, and incidentals to the project site; for the establishment of all offices, building and other facilities necessary for the work on this project; and for all other work operations which must be performed or cost incurred without other pay items on the various contract items on the project site. Re-mobilizations from street to street and as needed in all other circumstances by the Contractor's operations, work sequencing, revised work sequencing, scheduling, revised schedules and for all work shall be included in various other pay items. No separate payment or change orders will be allowed for any re-mobilizations related to additive work shall be included in the additive work pay items. Mobilization and Demobilization as necessary by the scope of work shall also include all costs required by the contract and included in the proposal item. When no such item is provided, payment for such costs will be considered to be included in the other items of work. 7-3.5 CONTRACT UNIT PRICES. 7-3.5.1 GENERAL. Add "Major Bid" between "an" and "item" in the first line of the third paragraph: The last sentence of the third paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Adjustments in excess of 25 percent may be done by extension of Contract Unit Prices as described above, or pursuant to 7-3.5.2 or 7-3.5.3 as appropriate. 7-3.5.2 INCREASES OF MORE THAN 25 PERCENT. Add "Major Bid" between "an" and "item" in the first line of the first paragraph. 7-3.5.3 DECREASES OF MORE THAN 25 PERCENT. Add "Major Bid" between "an" and "item" in the first line of the first paragraph. 7-3.7 AGREED PRICES. Add the following before the first sentence of the first paragraph: Agreed Prices are prices for new or unforeseen work, or adjustments in Contract Unit Prices per 3-5, established by mutual agreement between the Contractor and the Agency. 7-4 PAYMENT FOR EXTRA WORK 7-4.3 MARKUP. The entire text of the Subsection 7-4.3 shall be deleted and replaced with the following: (a) Work by Contractor. The following percentages shall be added to the Contractor's costs and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profits: 1) Labor...................................................... 10 41 Page 200 2) Materials ................................................05 3) Equipment Rental...................................05 4) Other Items and Expenditures................05 To the sum of the costs and markups provided for in this subsection, 1 percent shall be added as compensation for bonding. (b) Work by Subcontractor. When all or any part of the extra work is performed by a Subcontractor, the markup established in 7-4.3(a) shall be applied to the Subcontractor's actual cost of such work. A markup of 5 percent of the subcontracted portion of the extra work may be added by the Contractor. SECTION 8 — FACILITIES FOR AGENCY PERSONNEL The provisions of this section shall be deleted and replaced with the following: Field offices for City personnel are not required; however, City personnel shall have the right to enter upon the project at all times and shall be admitted to the offices and sanitary facilities provided by the Contractor for use by his own personnel. 42 Page 201 PART 2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SECTION 206— MISCELLANEOUS METAL ITEMS 206-6 CHAIN LINK FENCE 206-6.1 GENERAL. The following paragraph shall be added following paragraph 2: For purposes of size, manufacture and fittings, center rails shall be considered as top rails. 206-6.3 CHAIN LINK FABRIC. This subsection is added: Unless otherwise specified, shall conform to 206-6.3.1 and 206-6.3.2. The wire barbs on all new chain link fabric shall be turned down. Page 202 PART 3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS SECTION 300 — REMOVALS AND EARTHWORK 300-1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 300-1.1 GENERAL The following paragraph shall be added at the end of the section: Clearing and grubbing limits shall extend to any areas of work outside the right-of-way that are shown on the plans. 300-1.4 PAYMENT. The following paragraph shall be added after the first paragraph: When the removal and disposal of materials are listed separately in the bid, payment for removal and disposal of said materials shall be made at the contract Unit Price as shown and shall not be included in the Lump Sum Price or the Price Per Acre bid for clearing and grubbing. Payment shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment and incidentals and for doing all work involved in said removal and disposal. 300-2 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 300-2.7 SELECTED MATERIAL. Replace this subsection with the following: Selected materials encountered in excavations within the project limits that meet the specifications for base material, trench bedding or backfill, topsoil or other specified materials shall be used as shown on the Plans, in the Specifications, or as directed by the Engineer. Topsoil excavated may be considered only for the purpose of backfilling areas to be planted. 300-2.9 PAYMENT. Replace the first sentence with the following: The quantity shown in the Bid Schedule for UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION shall be the final quantity for which payment will be made, as provided in the "Instruction to Bidders", Item I, of the specifications. The designation (F)following the Bid Item in the schedule of Unit Cost and Lump Sum Amounts indicates said final pay quantity and/or costs. 300-3 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL 300-3.1 GENERAL. Add the following paragraph to the end of this subsection: Page 203 When it becomes necessary to excavate beyond the normal lines of excavation in order to remove boulders, broken concrete, or other interfering objects, or in order to form sidewalls, all voids created by the removal shall be backfilled and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) relative compaction. 300-3.3 FOUNDATION MATERIAL TREATMENT. Add the following paragraph to the end of this subsection: When footings without pile foundations for retaining walls or bridges are to be constructed upon an embankment fill, a relative compaction of not less than 95 percent shall be obtained for the embankment under the footings within the limits established by inclined planes sloping 1.5:1 out and down from lines one foot outside the bottom edges of the footing. 300-3.5 STRUCTURE BACKFILL Add the following to the second paragraph. Compaction equipment or methods which may cause excessive displacement or may damage structures, such as sleeve tampers, shall not be used. 300-4 UNCLASSIFIED FILL 300-4.1 GENERAL. Add the following at the end of paragraph two: . . . or in areas to be landscaped. 300-4.10 PAYMENT. Delete the first sentence of the first paragraph and replace with the following: The quantity shown in the Proposal for UNCLASSIFIED FILL shall be the final quantity for which payment will be made, as provided in the "Instruction to Bidders", Item I, of the specifications. The designation (F) following the Bid Item in the Schedule of Unit Cost and Lump Sum Amounts indicates said final pay quantity and/or costs. Page 204 PART 4 EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SECTION 400 — PROTECTION AND RESTORATION 400-1 GENERAL The second paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following paragraphs: The Contractor shall relocate, repair, replace or reestablish all existing improvements within the project limits which are not designated for removal (e.g., curbs, sidewalks, driveways, fences, walls, irrigation systems, signs, utility installations, pavements, structures, landscaping etc.)which are damaged or removed as a result of his operations or as required by the Plans and Specifications. Damaged or removed traffic signal detector loops and or irrigation systems shall be replaced or repaired and returned to service within 72 hours except as directed by the Engineer. Where existing traffic striping, pavement markings, and curb markings are damaged or their reflectivity reduced by the Contractor's operations, such striping or markings shall also be considered as existing improvements and the Contractor shall repaint or replace such improvements. Relocations, repairs, replacements or re-establishments shall be at least equal to the existing improvements and shall match such improvements in finish and dimensions unless otherwise specified. The following paragraph shall be added following the last paragraph: All costs to the Contractor for protecting, removing, restoring, relocating, repairing, replacing, or re-establishing existing improvements shall be included in the Bid. Page 205 PART 9 PROJECT TECHNICAL PROVISIONS SECTION 900 — PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND SURFACING REMOVAL 900-1 SCOPE The contractor shall remove and dispose the playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base. The scope of work for the shall include furnishing all materials, labor, tools, equipment, and all incidentals, and for doing all the work involved in removing and properly disposing playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base. 900-2 PAYMENT The contract lump sum price for the Diesel Tank Removal shall be considered full compensation for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits and proper removal and disposal, including furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and all incidentals, and for doing all the work involved in removing and properly disposing playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base, and no additional compensation will be allowed. SECTION 901 — PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND SURFACING INSTALLATION 901-1 SCOPE The contractor shall furnish and install the playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base specified on plans and equipment list. The scope of work for the installation of the playground equipment and surfacing shall include furnishing all materials, labor, tools, equipment, and all incidentals, and for doing all the work involved in installing playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base as shown on the plans and in the equipment list. 901-2 PAYMENT The contract lump sum price for furnishing and installing the playground equipment, rubber surfacing and sub-base shall be considered full compensation for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits and installation, including furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and all incidentals, and for doing all the work involved in the installation of the playground equipment and surfacing shown on the plans and in the equipment list. Page 206 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 - CITY WORKING DAYS CALENDAR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKING DAY CALENDAR FOR 2025 JANUARY FEBRUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Holiday 1 2 22 23 24 25 26 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 4 5 6 7 27 28 29 30 31 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 16 17 ` 18 19 20 21 22 8 9 10 11 12 Holiday 32 33 34 35 19 20 � 21 22 23 24 25 23 24 25 26 27 28 Holidayl 131 14 15 16 1 36 37 38 39 40 26 27 �28 30 3117 J29 19 20 21 MARCH APRIL Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 r 762 3 4 5 63 64 65 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 41 42 43 44 45 66 66 67 68 69 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 46 471 48 491 50 1 1 70 71 72 731 74 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 51 52 53 54 55 75 /()1 77 78 79 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 56 57 58 59 60 80J30 82 30 31 61 MAY JUNE Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat rT2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84 104 105 106 107 108 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 85 86 87 88 89 109 110 111 112 113 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 �20 21 90 91 92 93 94 114 115 116 117 118 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 �25 26 27 28 95 96 97 98 99 119 120 121 122 123 25 26 & 27 28 29 �30 31 29 30 Holiday 100 101 102 1031 1 124 Page 209 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKING DAY CALENDAR FOR 2025 JULY AUGUST Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 , 5 1 2 125 126 127 Holiday 147 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 128 129 130 131 132 148 149 150 151 152 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 133 134 135 1361 1371 1 153 154 155 1561 157 20 21 22 23 24 25 ]1442 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 138 139 140 141 158 159 160 161 162 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 �26 �27 28 29 30 143 144 145 146 163 164 165 166 167 31 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 Holiday 168 169 170 171 189 190 191 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 172 173 174 175 176 192 193 194 195 196 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 177 1781 1791 1801 1811 197 1981 199 2001 201 21 22 23 24 25 �26 �27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 182 183 184 185 186 202 203 204 205 206 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 1971 1981 2071 2081 209 210 211 NOVEMBER DECEMBER Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 229 230 231 232 233 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 212 213 214 215 216 234 235 236 237 238 9 10 11 -rLa 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 217 Holiday 218 219 220 1 239 2401 241 2421 243 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24*4 25* 26 27 2211 2221 2231 2241 2251 1 244 245 Holida Holida closed 23 24 25 �26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 226 227 228 Holida Holiday closed 1closed 1 Holiday 30 Page 210 APPENDIX 2 - LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ALL PURCHASE ORDERS,CONTRACTS,AND ppppppp, CHECKS TO BE MADE OUT TO: Sourcewell LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. landscape 601 7TH STREET SOUTH structures® DELANO, MN 55328 U.S.A. Awarded 763-972-3391 800-328-0035 Customer Information Fax: 763-972-3185 Sourcewell Contract No. 010521-LSI CONTACT: Daniel Alters PHONE (909)774-4137 Destination EMAIL: Daniel.Akers(a)cityofrc.us F.O.B. FREIGHT 0 Prepaid ❑ Collect SHIP TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Maintenance 8794 Lion St. Net 30 days upon credit approv.,deposit may be required Kit/Info? Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 TERMS(Subject To Credit Approval By LSI) 10 to 12 Weeks BILL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga SHIPPING TIME 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Pricing Good for 60 days from Date of Proposal We are pleased to submit this proposal to supply the following items: Project Name: Mountain View Park Playground Replacement QTY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION EXTENDED AMT 1 PKG25-56 Park &Playground Package per Desgin #1196037-02-03 $ 357,010.20 1 Discount Sourcewell Discount 8% $ (28,560.82) 1 Labor Mobility&Security Fencing $ 3,213.86 1 Labor Demo& Remove Existing Play Equipment, Rubber Surfacing & Sub-Base $ 65,973.60 1 Labor Site Prep: 4" thick Compacted Aggregate for PIP Sub-Base $ 51,230.52 1 Labor Installation of Landscape Structures Playground drawing#1196037-02-03 $ 209,701.80 1 Labor Material/Install of 6500 SF Surface America Combo thickness (3.5" &4.5") $ 196,783.09 100% Color(TBD), Aliphatic binder w/Stream & Forest Graphics 1 Bond Performance & Payment Bond $ 26,979.21 1 INS Contractor's Protective Insurance $ 5,000.00 Standard Terms and Conditions for Installation Apply SIGNATURE BELOWACCEPTING THIS PROPOSAL WILL CONSTITUTE A PURCHASE Total Weight 28,860 Ibs ORDER ONLY UPONAPPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE STRUCTURES,INC.CUSTOMER SUBTOTAL MATERIAL $ 328,449.38 RECEIPT OFAN ORDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CONSTITUTES SUCHAPPROVAL. BONDS&INSURANCE $ 31,979.21 INSTALLATION $ 526,902.87 ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER DATE FREIGHT $ 18,500.00 PRINT NAME T"u7-r S mifk, 8/12/2025 SALES TAX $ 25,454.83 PROPOSED BY LSI REPRESENTATIVE DATE Taylor Smith, Coast Recreation TOTAL $931,286.29 PRINT NAME Taxable: Freight Installation Page 212 APPENDIX 3 - EQIUPMENT LIST Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 Equipment List PlayBooster (5-12 years) Direct Bury Aluminum CO: Leaf/Limon/Acorn/Acorn ProShield® Finish Posts/Arches: M Leaf Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon Play Components: E] Limon Polyethylene Slide Hoods/O-Zone®: Acorn Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn Permalene° Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black Secondary Permalene: Recycled Leaf w/Black Tertiary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black TenderTuff Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown Decks/Step Ladders: Brown Cables Cables: [I Tan Vibe®/SteelX° Primary Panels: Acorn Shade Upper Sails: Tan FR QTY NO. DESCRIPTION Freestanding Play Climbers 3 120711A Pod Climber 16" DB Play Components: Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn=318 Motion & More Fun 1 158105A Wobble Pod DB Only Play Components: C] Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: M Acorn=318 Signs 1 182503C Welcome Sign (LSI Provided)Ages 5-12 years Direct Bury Posts/Arches: @ Leaf=316 PlayBooster® Bridges& Ramps Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 1 of 8 Page 214 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 QTY NO. DESCRIPTION 1 152443A Grid Walk w/Barriers Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown=002 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 Climbers Nature-Inspired 1 172666A Corkscrew Climber w/Recycled Wood-Grain Handholds 48"Dk DB Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Play Components: ❑ Limon=317 1 169322C 'Discovery Tree Climb w/Aluminum Post w/o Roof DB Only Posts/Arches: E Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 1 207584A 'The Den° Rock Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 1 169318C Wood Plank Wiggle Ladder 48"Deck w/Recycled Wood-Grain Handh Wood Plank Wiggle Ladder 48"Deck w/Recycled Wood- Grain Handholds DB Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 1 111812A HEADFORM SET Climbers W/Permalene Handholds 1 345311A Cliff Climber 48"Dk DB Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Play Components: ❑ Limon=317 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Secondary Permalene: Recycled Leaf w/Black=816 Tertiary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 1 148039A Star Seeker DB Only Attached to Hex Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown=002 Cables: 7 Tan=044 1 152907D Deck Link w/Barriers 4 Steps Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown=002 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 Primary Panels: Acorn=318 Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 2 of 8 Page 215 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 II QTY NO. DESCRIPTION 1 345326A Pod Climber No Handsupports 24"Dk DB Left Mounted Handhold Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Play Components: Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: -'-, Acorn=318 Primary Permalene: e'j Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 1 345326A Pod Climber No Handsupports 24"Dk DB Right Mounted Handhold Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Play Components: Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn=318 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Custom 1 CP003331 10' PlayOdyssey°Tower with outer posts &supports Modified to have outer posts without caps for CP000149 corrugated roof DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 1 CP000149A DTR PlayOdyssey°Treehouse Corrugated Steel roof Includes post extensions. Trimming may be required during install. Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: 0 Brown=002 1 CP014465 Seeker climber 72"dk to NetPlex° equal 72i height. Includes 1- barrier handhold on deck side only. Ground level cables on NetPlex sides removed. Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Play Components: Limon=317 Primary Permalene: eo Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: 0 Brown=002 Cables: Tan=044 1 CP045314 48" Deck Loop Pole w RPL Handholds 4-1/2"SM Mink and Cedar boards. Custom Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Play Components: Limon=317 3 CP000108A GFRC DTR Epoxy Branch Barrier.Above Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 3 of 8 Page 216 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 WNO. DESCRIPTION 1 CP000483A DTR SkyWays® 30ft dia. 7-Post NetPlex®Shade 105mph wind 5psi snow, NOTE:A separate freight quote from Dallas Skyways facility is required for this model.Custom Posts/Arches: N Leaf=316 Upper Sails: ❑ Tan FR=496 1 CP000484A DTR NetPlex° 7-Post. Use with 7-Post Shade DB Decks 1 178710A Hexagon Tenderdeck Clamps/Ball Connectors: Limon=317 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 4 121948A Kick Plate 8"Rise Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 2 111228A Square Tenderdeck Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 1 185852A Transfer Step w/2 Handloops DB Posts/Arches: i Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown=002 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 1 169321A Tree Stump Transfer Module 48"Dk(DB Only) Posts/Arches: 0 Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 4 111231A Triangular Tenderdeck Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 Enclosures 1 120314A Wire Barrier Above Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: Brown=002 5 169319A Recycled Wood-Grain Lumber Panel Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 1 345285A Rain Sound Wheel Panel Above Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑] Limon=317 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Secondary Permalene: Recycled Leaf w/Black=816 Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 4 of 8 Page 217 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 NO. DESCRIPTION IN 1 115236A Ball Maze Panel Above Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Primary Permalene: i Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 1 173565A Xylofun Panel Above Deck Clamps/Ball Connectors: (❑ Limon=317 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Mainstructures 1 271912A NetPlex®Skyportlm Climber w/Alpine®Slide 7-Post Posts/Arches: ■ Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Slide Hoods/O-Zone®: Acorn=318 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn=318 Primary Permalene: i Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 Cables: ❑ Tan=044 1 185346A 10'Tower SlideWinder26 Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: 0 Acorn=318 Motion & More Fun 1 120901A Grab Bar Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Barriers/Ladders/Benches: E Brown=002 1 111363A Talk Tube At Grade Mounted Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Play Components: ❑ Limon=317 1 111362A Talk Tube 40'Tubing Kit PB Posts 2 111404G 100"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 2 111404F 108"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 2 111404C 132"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 1 111404B 140"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 4 111404A 148"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 5 of 8 Page 218 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 NO. DESCRIPTION 3 111404M 148"Steel Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 1 111404H 92"Alum Post DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Slides 1 169317B Firepole w/Recycled Wood-Grain Handholds 72"Dk DB Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑❑ Limon=317 Play Components: ❑ Limon=317 1 130390A 'Double Swoosh TM Slide 72"Dk DB Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn=318 Smart Play(2-5 years) Direct Bury Aluminum CO: Leaf/Limon/Acorn/Acorn ProShield° Finish Posts/Arches: Leaf Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon Play Components: ❑ Limon Polyethylene Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn Permalene° Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black Secondary Permalene: Recycled Leaf w/Black Tertiary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black TenderTuff Decks/Step Ladders: Brown Swings Posts: Leaf Beams: ❑ Limon Clamps: ❑ Limon Molded Bucket Seats: Acorn Seat Harness: Leaf Vibe®/SteelX® Lower Roofs: Acorn Upper Roofs: Leaf Primary Panels: Acorn Shade Shade Posts: Leaf Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 6 of 8 Page 219 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 QTY NO. DESCRIPTION Freestanding Play Custom 1 CP025237 AIA DigiFuse° Red Fox Sit-In Spring Rider No Approval required. Permalene Backer DB Primary Permalene: Cj Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 1 CP037526 AIA DigiFuse° Black Bear Spring Sit-On Rider Same outline as standard 233059. DB Motion & More Fun 1 249558A We-Go-Round TM w/Nature Digifuse Panels And 2 Seats Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Play Components: Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: --, Acorn=318 Primary Permalene: e'j Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Signs 1 182503A Welcome Sign (LSI Provided)Ages 2-5 years Direct Bury Posts/Arches: Leaf=316 Swings 1 177351A Molded Bucket Seat w/Harness ProGuard Chains for 8' Bm Hgt Molded Bucket Seat w/Harness ProGuard Chains for 8' Beam Height Molded Bucket Seats: N Acorn=318 Seat Harness: r Leaf=316 1 177332A Single Post Swing Frame 8' Height DB Only Posts: Leaf=316 Beams: Limon=317 Clamps: Limon=317 1 177333A Single Post Swing Frame Add'I Bay 8' Height DB Only Single Post Swing Frame Additional Bay 8' Height DB Only Posts: Leaf=316 Beams: Limon=317 Clamps: Limon=317 1 174018A Belt Seat ProGuard Chains for 8' Beam Height 2 176038A Full Bucket Seat ProGuard Chains for 8' Beam Height Smart Play° Ages 2-5 Yrs Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 7 of 8 Page 220 Color Verification Summary landscape Mountain View Park structures 1196037-02-03 NO. DESCRIPTION I" 1 CP021770A DTR Sprig Aluminum posts, Steel roof posts, Double Swirl Slide and Curved Slide, No modifications allowed,Shade is always Pne Green (120) DB Posts/Arches: M Leaf=316 Clamps/Ball Connectors: ❑ Limon=317 Play Components: ❑ Limon=317 Slides/Tunnels/Gliders/E-Pods°: Acorn=318 Primary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Secondary Permalene: Recycled Leaf w/Black=816 Tertiary Permalene: Recycled Acorn w/Black=818 Decks/Step Ladders: Brown=002 Lower Roofs: Acorn=318 Upper Roofs: Leaf=316 Primary Panels: Acorn=318 Shade Posts: Leaf=316 6500 sf Surface America Playground Surfacing(3.5" &4.5") 100%Color(TBD),Aliphatic binder w/Stream&Forest Graphics 4"thick Compacted Aggregate for PIP Sub-Base Created from Play365 on Wednesday,July 9, 2025 2:12:26 PM Page 8 of 8 Page 221 APPENDIX 4 - PROJECT DRAWING FEI ING HAS A SKYWAYS f , N IT, A SEPARATE UOTE FROM DALLAS Uv�l FACILITY IS REQUIRED OTES:C 201R // `\` � \\ 2 5 WINO LOAD OF 105 MPH 175 MPH WIND LOAD FRAME ONLY-NO FABRIC SNOW LOAD OF 5 PSF-DOES NOT INCLUDE SNOW DRIFT 1 \ PROPER ACCESS TO SITE FOR MATERIALS&EQUIPMENT DELIVERY \ p STANDARD COLOR FABRIC r'HI b PRICE INCLUDES ANCHOR BOLTS(NON-GALVANIZED)IF REQUIRED EPDXY FOR ANCHORS TO BE PROVIDED BY INSTALLER 2-5 PRICE INCLUDES ZINC RICH PRIMER "� � \ �• USE OR SALES TAX NOT INCLUDED �\ ���\� / Z 1\ \ INSTALLATION NOT INCLUDED j/ \ j Vi ;\e ms \\\` ue."�� •v ALL COMPONENTS TO BE SHIPPED AT THE SAME TIME �\ me M It \/ I " 11 5-12 I wk P � \ // \ \ MxKaAox. ,N P I" THISPINY A PLAY EQUIPMENT IS DEESIGNED FOROR AGES GES N6 \ �J UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDOTED ON ON PIAN. IT IS THE MANUFACTURERS OPINION THAT THIS PLAY AREA DOES CONFORM TO THE A.DA.ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, ` \\ �\��`-��•�� _ \\ ASSUMING AN ACCESSIBLE PROTECTIVE SOREMWITHIN T G IS PROVIDED, HE S IINDIICATED,OR ,�m \\ \ mxx nE soma / E ZONE \ ON roI RANI'A"IINiProWnS BASEDTO ___ coNGlCEE DIM DErN D erz RAPHY U1 INCLUDING SITE DIMENSIONS.TOPOGRAPHY IX6TINC INIO HOOUL U ID BEOOiMNED D DRNN­ IN E FIru Lws EYAiW unuzm IN Tx L w.PE vERII IFr uL DIMENSIONS OF PAY ARM SIZE,ORIENWON,MD W KDOON OF ALL EXISTING UTUTIES.EDUEMUOTE I oa/yQ�a\.\ n 1 . o'A PROA CR rEcnvEHwrsAc ue MArERIA�inA \ B P. I6w wry ,w,o ' asrc wvixum WAMSTMF BZ HEIGHT ANEIFOR THE ESUYEIPMENTT ttT(REF� �\ 'x / ERFORN NCE SPECIHCATIONHFOR PUYGRouxO 14 fi4 ]Z / EOUIPMEMAFOR PUBLIC USE,6ECTION 6 CURRENT 1 _BW / m NEO50F ITHE SOLL GOES N 56 iHRNN WRNLY \ R N STOO BE TUED OR SLOPED I/6"i0 / PER cm qB \\ T TO A STORM-ER 01 A•IRENCx 0'P N \ ARM OF \ ACCESSIBLE/PROTECTIVE .wowu SURFACING (POURED-IN-PLACE SUGGESTED) Yv Ftll „MwIM —' run / li IS THE MANUFACTURER'S OPINION AND HMIUNk 1Z0 `\, % IN ENT THAT COMPONENTS TCO FORM WITH HE IYOUT OF THESE ME / U.S.CONSUMER PRODUCT S<FETY COMMISSION'S(CPSC) 'HANDBOOK FOR PUBUC PLAYGROUND SAFETY'. DESIGNED BY: COPYRIGNIUC )SCAP Hr:7/9 5-12 2-5 DSCPP STRUCTURE IANE STRUCTURES,INC. mm TOTAL ELEVATED PLAY COMPONENTS I TOTAL ELEVATED PLAY COMPONENTS 7 TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY RAMP 0 RE UIRED 0 TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY RAMP 0 REQUIRED 0 TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY TRANSFER 15 RFOIIIRFD 10 TOTAL ELEVATED COMPONENTS ACCESSIBLE BY TRANSFER 7 RFOUJIRF_) 4 5 29 a5 1191MIN-M-02 LAW TOTAL ACCESSIBLE GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS SHOWN 8 RFOUIRFD 6 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS SHOWN 7 REQUIRE) 3 5/21/25 1199037-02-01 W4C TOTAL DIFFERENT TYPES OF GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS 6 REQUIRED 6 TOTAL DIFFERENT TYPES OF GROUND LEVEL COMPONENTS 6 REQUIRED 6 I» PTMun°'°'^"9 LNIIUM Mountain View Coast Recreation SmortPlay Park Inc. no �a Menifee, CA Taylor Smith DRnwlnc 1196037-02-03 Page 223 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Lelani Gnaster, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Contract with Gentry General Engineering, Inc. in the Amount of$57,480 Plus 10% Contingency for Construction for the Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project (Project), a Contract with Onward Engineering, Inc. in the Amount of $10,400 for Construction Inspection Services, Authorization of an Appropriation of Expenditures in the Amount of $75,200 from the Citywide Infrastructure Fund (198), and Approval of a Maintenance Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the Fencing Improvements. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fence Project (Project) on file with the City Engineer; 2. Reject the bid received from Dash Construction as non-responsive to the request for bids and accept the remaining bid received for the Project; 3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $57,480 to the lowest responsive bidder, Gentry General Engineering, Inc. (Gentry General), for the total bid amount; 4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $5,750 for the construction contract; 5. Authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $10,400 to Onward Engineering, Inc. (Onward)for construction inspection services; 6. Authorize an appropriation of expenditures in the amount of $75,200 from the Citywide Infrastructure Fund (198); and Page 224 7. Approve a Project Specific Maintenance Agreement (PSMA) between the City and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the fencing improvements and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: In Fall 2024, two (2) suicides occurred on the Haven Avenue Overcrossing at the 210 Freeway. Attachment 1 includes the Project vicinity map. The City quickly engaged with the County of San Bernardino, Caltrans, and local and state representatives to discuss the issue and determine the best course of action. As an immediate intervention, informational signs with the suicide crisis line were installed at the overcrossing in the Fall. City staff also began preparing concepts to coordinate with Caltrans on the design of access deterrent fencing to enhance public safety. Evidence of interventions, with varying designs, in other communities demonstrates that barriers at high-risk locations are effective in deterring suicides, providing individuals with an opportunity to seek help or for bystanders to intervene. A study conducted by the National Library of Medicine in Switzerland in 2017, compared the effectiveness of different suicide prevention measures at bridges and buildings. The study determined that sites secured by fences showed a reduction in suicides by approximately 68.7%. Although the type of fencing intervention varies by location, the study demonstrates that any form of intervention significantly improved the number of suicides reported at each location. In October 2024, City staff submitted an encroachment permit application to Caltrans. An encroachment permit is required for the City to construct the improvements within Caltrans right of way. The original application included standard fencing along the slopes of the overcrossing and along the barriers. However, there were concerns with visibility at the intersections due to the fencing along the barriers and the overall effectiveness of this design. Caltrans also requested structural design calculations to support the encroachment permit application. In November 2024, City staff engaged with Kimley-Horn & Associates (Kimley-Horn), one of the City's on-call engineering consultants, to perform structural calculations for the proposed fencing. Kimley-Horn developed an alternative design to deter access that is connected to the existing barrier. Attachment 2 shows the proposed fencing design and the four locations where the access deterrent fencing will be installed. City staff and Kimley-Horn met with the Caltrans team in January 2025 to present the new concept. Caltrans agreed with the revised plan and the formal encroachment permit application was resubmitted in February. After multiple rounds of revision and meetings with Caltrans, Caltrans approved the proposed designs and issued the encroachment permit in June. The PSMA (Attachment 3) is also required to formalize maintenance responsibilities for the proposed fencing. This agreement will ensure that the infrastructure is properly maintained in accordance with City and Caltrans standards. The City will be responsible for maintaining the new fencing per the PSMA. ANALYSIS: The Project's scope of work includes the installation of access deterrent fencing at the four corner locations of the bridge on the existing pedestrian fencing. The contract documents call for 10 working days to complete the Project. The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on July 10 and July 15, 2025. Bids were opened on July 29, 2025. Two (2) construction bids were received on Planet Bids, the Page 2 Page 225 City's online e-bidding platform and one (1) bidder, Dash Construction was deemed nonresponsive for failing to provide a bid bond as required by the request for bids and state law. Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found one (1) to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder Gentry General meets the requirements of the bid documents. The Engineer's estimate for the Project was $59,400. The apparent lowest responsive bid was determined to be Gentry General, in the amount of $57,480. A full bid summary is included in Attachment 4. ENVIRONMENTAL: Staff has determined that the Project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 "Existing: Facilities Subsection (c), Class 1" A Notice of Exemption was filed with the County of San Bernardino on October 25, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: In December 2025, Engineering Services issued a purchase order for design services for the Project to Kimley-Horn under the Engineering On-Call contract for $32,830 and funded from the Infrastructure Fund (198). Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows: Expenditure Category Amount Construction Contract $ 57,480 Contract Contingency (10%) $ 5,750 Construction Inspection Services $ 10,400 Bid Noticing Advertisement $ 1,570 Estimated Contract Costs $ 75,200 This Project arose as an emergency response and therefore, was not budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget. Staff is recommending that funding in the amount of $75,200 be appropriated for the Project from the Infrastructure Fund (198) for construction. Account No. Funding Source Amount F198 CC307 SC7004 Infrastructure Fund (198) $75,200 PID2174-198 Total Project Funding $75,200 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Fence Exhibit Attachment 3 — Project Specific Maintenance Agreement Attachment 4 — Bid Summary Page 3 Page 226 Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE I Project Location: IY Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 PROJECT SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA This Project Specific Maintenance Agreement ("AGREEMENT") is made effective this day of , 20 , by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation ("STATE"), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("LOCAL AGENCY"); each may be referred to individually as a "PARTY" and jointly as "PARTIES." RECITALS 1 . WHEREAS, an Encroachment Permit No. 08-24-N-MC-1348 dated June 18, 2025 was executed between LOCAL AGENCY and STATE to document the understanding between PARTIES regarding the planned improvement of the State Highway Route (SR) SR-210 and the adjustments of Haven Avenue, the local street, and road system required for the development of that portion of SR 210 within the jurisdictional limits of the LOCAL AGENCY. 2. WHEREAS, the PARTIES hereto mutually desire to identify the maintenance responsibilities for the features and improvements, as defined herein, constructed or installed within the STATE right of way. 3. Categories of State Highway System (SHS) facilities covered under this AGREEMENT may include but are not limited to the following, which are specifically identified in Exhibit A: A. Screening - Railing Assembly Frame Fencing Units (3' 1 1 " by 9' 10 '/4" at corners of bridge deck in four locations total) installed on a bridge safety barrier to protect the safety of the traveling public. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS 1. Maintenance Standards. PARTIES shall perform all maintenance in compliance with the standards set forth in Streets and Highways Code section 27, and in accordance with California laws, regulations, and STATE standards, including STATE'S Maintenance Manual, Code of Safe Operating Practices, policies, procedures, and specifications in effect and as amended. "Maintain" or "Maintenance" under this AGREEMENT includes routine inspections, repairs, cleaning, and State approved replacements. 1 Page 230 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-2d-210-PM 6.9-CN34 2. Maintenance Service Schedule. Upon approval of the necessary Encroachment Permit to perform maintenance, LOCAL AGENCY shall provide STATE's District Area Maintenance Superintendent, as shown in Exhibit C, at least twenty-four (24) hour prior telephone or email notice before performing any maintenance services under this AGREEMENT. LOCAL AGENCY shall notify the STATE of the frequency of its maintenance services. Maintenance services shall be performed between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM or otherwise authorized by STATE and may be performed on weekends and holidays if necessary. 3. Revising Exhibits. When another planned future improvement has been constructed and/or a revision to SHS facilities has been affected within the limits of the improvement covered by this AGREEMENT, PARTIES can revise this AGREEMENT by mutually amending, replacing, or providing additional pages to the Exhibits that must be signed by authorized representatives of PARTIES. No formal amendment to the body of this AGREEMENT will be necessary. The revised exhibit will thereafter supersede the previous Exhibit and become part of this AGREEMENT. 4. Amendment to Agreement. Except as provided in the preceding section concerning Exhibit amendments, the terms of this AGREEMENT can be changed only by a formal written amendment executed by all PARTIES. 5. Successors. This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the PARTIES and their respective successors-in-interest including, any subsequently incorporated city or other municipality established within the LOCAL AGENCY's jurisdictional limits. If the successor city or municipality fails to enter into a new agreement with STATE to accept the obligations of the LOCAL AGENCY, LOCAL AGENCY shall continue to be contractually bound to STATE by the terms of this AGREEMENT. 6. Encroachment Permits. Before LOCAL AGENCY may enter STATE ROW to install any encroachment or perform any maintenance or work in the areas covered by this AGREEMENT, LOCAL AGENCY must first apply for and obtain an encroachment permit(s) from the STATE's District 08 Encroachment Permit Office as per STATE's EP policy. An encroachment permit issued by the STATE will be at no cost to LOCAL AGENCY. 7. Overcrossing (Vehicular and Nonvehicular). STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall maintain Overcrossing(s) respectively as follows: A. STATE shall inspect and maintain, at STATE's expense, all elements of the Overcrossing(s), except for the Screening as discussed under this AGREEMENT. State shall also remove any unsheltered encampments 2 Page 231 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-2d-210-PM 6.9-CN34 that could affect the structural integrity of the components listed in this section (7A). B. Screening. PARTY who is identified as responsible for maintaining the screening in Exhibit A, shall maintain the screening over the STATE Overcrossing(s). 8. Legal Relations and Responsibilities. A. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This AGREEMENT is not intended to create duties, obligations, or rights of third parties beyond the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT. Nor does this AGREEMENT affect a PARTY's legal liability by imposing any standard of care for the operation and maintenance of STATE highways and LOCAL AGENCY facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. B. Indemnification. Neither LOCAL AGENCY nor any of its officers or employees is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon STATE pursuant to this AGREEMENT. To the fullest extent permitted by law, STATE, shall fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless LOCAL AGENCY and its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every kind occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, its contractors, sub-contractors, and/or its agents pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Neither STATE nor any of its officers or employees is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon LOCAL AGENCY pursuant to this AGREEMENT. To the fullest extent permitted by law, LOCAL AGENCY, shall fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless STATE and its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every kind occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY, its contractors, sub-contractors, and/or its agents pursuant to this AGREEMENT. C. Prevailing Wages and Labor Code Compliance. LOCAL AGENCY shall comply with any and all applicable labor and prevailing wage requirements in Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1815 and implementing regulations for any public works or maintenance 3 Page 232 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-2d-210-PM 6.9-CN34 contracts and subcontracts executed for the LOCAL AGENCY's work under this AGREEMENT. D. Self-Insured. LOCAL AGENCY is self-insured. LOCAL AGENCY shall deliver evidence of self-insured coverage providing general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability, in an amount of $1 million per occurrence, $2 million in aggregate, and $5 million in excess, as may be amended as the minimum liability coverage limits codified in the State's Standard Specifications, by delivering a Letter Certifying Self-Insurance. The Letter of Self- Insurance must be substantially in the form of Exhibit B, and identify the AGREEMENT number, and location as depicted in Exhibit A. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide the original Letter Certifying Self- Insurance as a condition to STATE's execution of this AGREEMENT. A copy of the original letter shall be attached to this AGREEMENT as Exhibit B. Self-Insured using Contractor. If the work performed under this AGREEMENT is done by LOCAL AGENCY`s contractor(s), LOCAL AGENCY shall require its contractor(s) to maintain in force, during the term of this AGREEMENT, a policy of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability, naming STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of $1 million per occurrence, $2 million in aggregate, and $5 million in excess. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide a certificate of insurance evidencing this insurance in a form satisfactory to STATE. 9. Default. If LOCAL AGENCY fails to perform obligations assumed under this AGREEMENT, STATE may by written notice request that the default be remedied within thirty (30) calendar days. If LOCAL AGENCY fails or refuses to do so, STATE may complete the obligations and seek reimbursement from the LOCAL AGENCY who shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days. 10. Complete Agreement. This AGREEMENT, along with any attachments, is the full and complete integration of the PARTIES' agreement with respect to the maintenance of the locations identified in Exhibit A. This AGREEMENT supersedes any previous written or oral agreements between the PARTIES with respect to the locations identified in Exhibit A. Unless otherwise stated, to the extent there is any conflict between this AGREEMENT and any other agreement (written or oral) regarding maintenance of the area identified in Exhibit A, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall control. 4 Page 233 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 11 . Severability. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision(s) of this AGREEMENT shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal. 12. Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY of any portion of this AGREEMENT shall not constitute a waiver of the same or any other portion hereof. 13. Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with California law. 14. Notice. If either PARTY shall desire or is required to give notice to the other, such notice shall be given in writing, via email, and concurrently delivered by: (a) personal delivery, in which case, notice is effective upon delivery; (b) overnight courier (i.e., Federal Express) with charges prepaid or charged to the sender's account, in which case, notice is effective when delivered; (c) priority U.S. Mail, in which case, notice shall be deemed delivered on the second business day after the deposit thereof with the U.S. Postal Service. 15. Cost. Any PARTY who is assigned obligation under this AGREEMENT shall complete them at their own costs, unless expressly stated otherwise in this AGREEMENT. 16. Termination. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the mutual written consent of each PARTY. The STATE may terminate this AGREEMENT, should the LOCAL AGENCY fail to perform the requirements of this AGREEMENT at the time and in the manner provided herein. 17. Effective Date. This AGREEMENT shall become effective on the last of the dates each PARTY's authorized representative has executed this AGREEMENT. 18. Authority. Each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of each PARTY represents and warrants that he/she is duly authorized to execute this AGREEMENT. LOCAL AGENCY represents and certifies that it has, through its regular political process, authorized the execution of this AGREEMENT by appropriate resolution, delegation, or plenary authority, as required. A true and correct copy of the local resolution or ordinance has been provided to the STATE. 19. Electronic Signatures. Electronic signatures of the PARTIES, whether digital or encrypted, are intended to authenticate this written AGREEMENT, and shall have the same force and effect as manual signatures for this Agreement. 5 Page 234 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Date: Date: L. Dennis Michael Joe Solis Mayor Deputy District Director Maintenance District 8 APPROVED: Date: John R. Gillison City Manager 6 Page 235 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 EXHIBIT A Plan map identifying the applicable STATE Route 210 (Freeway proper) and facilities. Page 236 00 GSOOry R110 �6.91L SNo. SHEETS PROJECT SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS RESTRICTION RAILING WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N 6 I c viry NRIOGE N0.51-06TI OSSING LEGENQ ACCESS RESTRI RAILING I NCNO III- -HE HAVEN Ave Nve -SSINN EXHIBIT A IE Page 237 SNo. SHEETS O6 C lw R". -6.9 1L 3 PROJECT SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS RESTRICTION RAILING WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA is-- •i i �ro e OVERCROSANG NMOGE N0.569Ra LEGExO. ACCESS NTAINCHOX RAILINGTO BE XCHO CHCANONGA oEanox. .—N Ave--..N. EXHIBIT A Page 238 00 C6BOTM R]10 �6.91L 6No. SHEETS PROJECT SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS RESTRICTION RAILING WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �e�m.o BRIDGE NO.SOa614 O551XG i li ii 1 LEGExO. ACCESS REITIBNTAIN Dff RAILING XCHO CDCAMOXGA oEanox. .—N Ave BveRCROSSINB EXHIBIT A ILE Page 239 GIST I COUNtt I ROUTE POST MILE SHEET TOTAL No. SHEETS S. SEE PROJECT SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS RESTRICTION RAILING NIITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ....aa....,,. .. yes.......... LEGEND Q ACCESS RESTRICTION-LING TO BE MAINTAINED 6Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �4QA➢QX: HAVEN Ave OVEROROSSRN EXHIBIT A Page 240 Mayor L. Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Council Members Ryan A. Hutchison, Kristine D. Scott,Ashley N. Stickler City Manager John R. Gillison CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 00. 10500 Civic Center I Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 1 1-909-477-2700 1 www.CiyofRC.us EXHIBIT B LETTER CERTIFYING LOCAL AGENCY'S SELF-INSURED STATUS On Local Agency letterhead California Department of Transportation District 8 20 ATTN: Joe Solis, Deputy District Director, Maintenance Re: Statement of Self-Insurance for City of Rancho Cucamonga for Project Specific Maintenance Agreement No. PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 with California Department of Transportation for the screening on SR 210 at PM 6.9 Dear Mr. Solis: This letter certifies that the LOCAL AGENCY is self-insured and self-funded covering third- party claims arising out of its general operations (i.e., commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance). Further, the LOCAL AGENCY is self-insured covering workers' compensation claims and has received the consent of the State Department of Industrial Relations to do so. Each fiscal year, as a part of its budgetary process, the LOCAL AGENCY appropriates funds specifically to satisfy valid third-party claims and workers' compensation claims, which may be brought against the LOCAL AGENCY. The LOCAL AGENCY certifies its self-insured, general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage liability, meets the required coverage amounts in section 8D (Insurance) of the Project Specific Maintenance Agreement, specifically general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury and property damage liability in an amount of $1 million per occurrence, $2 million in aggregate, and $5 million in excess. If you need any additional information regarding this letter, please direct those inquiries through my office. Sincerely, Jason C. Welday Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Page 241 Rev. 05/2025 PSMA-25-08-SBd-210-PM 6.9-CN34 Exhibit C PARTY Representatives Contact information. LOCAL AGENCY Public Works Director: Maritza Martinez 8794 Lion St. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Contact Number: (909) 774-4092 STATE AREA MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT Foothill Maintenance Superintendent: Erik Clarke Email: erik.clarke@dot.ca.gov Phone: (909) 677-3471 Page 242 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 243 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-095 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Median, and LIVID 3B Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $422,050 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-095 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $422,050 for FY 2025/26. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. On June 5, 2024, City Council awarded a competitively bid contract CO 2024-095 for Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Median, and LIVID 3B Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., of Irwindale, California, effective July 1, 2024 for a one (1) year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years through June 30, 2031. Currently, all sites are maintained at Service Level A. If approved, Amendment No. 1 to contract CO 2024-095 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2026, with a 2.9% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed "extra work" line items. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. ANALYSIS: Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during FY 2025/26. Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., is requesting a 2.9% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed "extra work" line items to cover increases in labor, material, and fuel costs. Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., continues to meet the services needs of the City and staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 2020-030 effective July 1, 2025 and approve the spending limit of$422,050 for FY 2025/26. Page 244 FISCAL IMPACT: The Proposed FY 2025/26 Budget includes $422,050 for Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Median, and LMD 3B Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in accounts F133 CC319 SC2109, F133 CC319 SC2106, F133 CC319 SC2109, and F133 CC320 SC2106. The contract spending limit of $422,050 includes a contingency of $50,646 for unforeseen work resulting from wind events or other emergencies. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, while providing high quality outdoor spaces. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Letter of Intent Page 2 Page 245 M A R 1 P o S A L A N D 5 C A P S I N C April 7,2025 Lisa O'Brien Business Manager Public Works Services Department RE: Landscape Maintenance Contract Extension Renewal FY 2025/2026 for RFP 23/24-003 Level "A" Dear Miss O'Brien, This letter serves as a request to extend and amend our current landscape maintenance contract agreement for contract RFP 23/24-003 for an additional year of service ending June 30th, 2026. Mariposa Landscapes Inc.would like to hereby request a 2.9%CPI (Consumer Price Index) increase to be equally applied to the current contract price sites and the extra work rates.The CPI increase is based on the most recent publication for the month of February 2025 for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area. If granted the increase will become effective July 11,2025. The current monthly compensation will change as follows: RFP 23/24-003 Level "A" Current Cost $15,983.85 per month FY2025/2026 Cost $16,447.38 per month ($ 197,368.56 per year) I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for allowing Mariposa Landscape Inc.to provide quality landscape maintenance services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.We look forward to a long and successful business relationship for many years to come. ully submitt d, Roberto P z—B anager a Landscapes, Inc. Roberto.Perez@ mariposa-ca.com (626)705-2921 (626)960-8477 fax ATTACHMENT 1 TEL 800.794 • 945$ + FAx 626 • 960* $477 * www.mariposa-ca.com 6232 SANTOS DIAZ ST.,IRWINDALE,CA 917.12 * CA CUNTRA;T;,'R'�LIC tt 592268 A,C-27,D-49 Our Core Values —Safety • Teamwork • Quality - Integrity A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-127 with BrightView Landscapes Inc. for LIVID 7 and LIVID 8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $529,450 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-127 with BrightView Landscapes, Inc., extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $529,450 for FY 2025/26. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. On June 19, 2024, City Council awarded a competitively bid contract CO 2024-127 for LMD 7 and LIVID 8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services with BrightView Landscapes Inc. effective July 1, 2024 for a one (1) year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years through June 30, 2031. Currently, all sites are maintained at Service Level A. If approved, Amendment No. 1 to contract CO 2024-127 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2026, with a 3.5% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed "extra work" line items. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. ANALYSIS: BrightView Landscapes Inc., continues to meet the services needs of the City and staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 2024-127 effective July 1, 2025 and approve the spending limit of$529,450 for FY 2025/26. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2025/26 Budget includes $529,450 for LIVID 7 and LIVID 8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in accounts F137 CC319 SC2105 and F138 CC319 SC2109. The contract spending limit of $529,450 includes a contingency of $79,420 for unforeseen work resulting from wind events or other emergencies. Page 247 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, while providing high quality outdoor spaces. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 248 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Richard Favela, Public Works Services Superintendent Lisa O'Brien, Public Works Business Manager Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-085 with Yunex LLC for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,470,660 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract CO 2024-085 with Yunex LLC, extending the term for an additional year through June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $1,470,660. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. On May 1, 2024, City Council awarded a competitively bid contract CO 2024-085 for Traffic Signal Maintenance to Yunex LLC, effective July 1, 2024 for a one (1) year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years through June 30, 2031. Yunex, LLC provides highly specialized technical service for traffic signal and safety lighting maintenance at the City's 240 locations including signalized intersections, signalized crosswalks, flashing crosswalks, and flashing school beacons. Over the years, Yunex, LLC's technicians have gained extensive institutional knowledge of the City's maintenance needs. Amendment No. 1 to contract CO 2024- 085 will extend the term one year, through June 30, 2026. The annual contract amount listed above includes both routine maintenance and a contingency for extra work. The routine maintenance includes a complete monthly inspection and service at 240 locations, including the City's signalized intersections, signalized crosswalks, flashing crosswalks, and flashing school beacons. The contingency for extra work is to complete repairs due to unforeseen failures, traffic accidents, or malfunctions of the traffic signal system, safety lighting, or internally illuminated street name signs. Examples of extra work repairs include, but are not limited to: • Repair or replacement of damaged traffic signal cabinets and controllers; • Repair or replacement of vehicle detection loops and video cameras; • Repair or replacement of emergency vehicle preempt equipment; • Repair or replacement of uninterrupted power supply equipment; Page 1 of 2 Page 249 • Replacement of damaged or downed traffic signal poles; • Replacement of damaged Public Safety Video Network (PSVN) cameras; • Replacement of damaged Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras; • Rewiring signalized intersections with new cables and conductors; and • Replacement of damaged or downed streetlight poles. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has 240 locations which are maintained through this contract with some of the equipment reaching their end-of-life expectancy. Consequently, due to the aging traffic signal infrastructure, rain and wind damage, and damage caused by motorist collisions, extra work is necessary. ANALYSIS: On June 22, 2025, Yunex LLC submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga through June 30, 2026, with a rate increase of 2.6%. Yunex LLC continues to provide expedient service to the city. Staff recommends City Council approve and extend the term of contract CO 2024-085 to an additional year effective July 1, 2025, in an amount not to exceed $1,470,660. The contract is on file with the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Services is included in the FY 2025/2026 Budget in the following accounts: Streets Maintenance (F001 CC318 SC2106) $26,090, Measure 1 2010-2040 (F177 CC318 SC2106) $1,307,880, CFD 2018-01 (F876 CC318 SC2106) $21,190, State Gas Tax (F174 CC318 SC2106) $60,500, Innovation and Technology Services (F001 CC209 SC2106) $15,000 and Police Administration (F001 CC701 SC1404) $40,000. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item advances the City Council's Core Values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Letter of Intent Attachment 2 — Rate Sheet Page 2 of 2 Page 250 N � X Yunex Traffic 2240 Business Way Riverside, California 92501 T R A F F I 951.784.6600 00 Fax June 22, 2025 Richard Favela Public Works Services Superintendent City of Rancho Cucamonga Subject:Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract extension &(2.6%)CPI Increase Request Dear Mr. Favela, Please consider this letter as a formal request for the extension of our current Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract.As discussed,we are requesting an extension for an additional 1 year which will extend the current contract through July 1, 2026.At this time,we are requesting an increase based upon the current CPI (2.6%)which we have attached for your reference. An updated rate schedule is attached. Please note that the current rate schedule will remain in place until the end of the fiscal year. We feel we have completed another successful and mutually beneficial year with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We thank you for your business and we are looking forward to continuing servicing the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank You, e"daz-e 574� Candace Gallaher Service Project Manager Yunex Traffic The foregoing offer is hereby accepted this day of , 2025. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Title Attachment 1 Page 251 U N - X Yunex Traffic 2240 Business Way Riverside, California 92501 951.784.6600 T R A F F I C 951.784.6700 Fax June 22, 2025 Richard Favela Public Works Services Superintendent City of Rancho Cucamonga Subject:Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract extension Price Sheet Section I: Routine Maintenance Item# Item Description a Monthly 1 Traffic Signal EA 194 $97.98 $19,008.12 2 Flashing Crosswalk EA 18 $65.66 $1,181.88 3 Signalized Crosswalk EA 12 $65.66 $787.92 4 Flashing School Beacons EA 4 $65.66 $262.64 5 Flashing Beacons EA 6 $54.38 $326.28 6 Radar Speed Limit Signs EA 2 $54.38 $108.76 1 7 Fiber Hubs EA 4 $76.95 $307.80 8 Safety Lights EA 1,182 $1.00 $1,182.00 9 Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs EA 783 $1.00 $783.00 10 Reflectorized Street Name Signs EA 19 $1.00 $19.00 Section I: Routine Maintenance Total: $23,967.40 Section II: Extraordinary Maintenance Labor m# Item Description uantity Regular 713 1 Superintendent 7771 1 $101.57 $126.09 2 Engineering Technician 1 $150.82 $189.99 Laboratory Technician $150.82 $189.99 14 Traffic Signal Senior Field Technician Level III (Lead)-IMSA HR 1 $150.82 $179.14 Certification 15 Traffic Signal Senior Bench Technician Level III-IMSA HR 1 $143.64 $179.14 Certification Fiber Optics for ITS,Traffic,and Communication Systems 16 Technician Level I-IMSA Certification Utility Technician-Lead HR 1 $150.82 $189.99 Restricted Attachment 2 Page 252 17 Traffic Signal Construction Technician Level II-IMSA HR 1 $143.64 $179.14 Certification 18 Traffic Signal Field Technician Level II-IMSA Certification HR 1 $143.64 $179.14 19 Traffic Signal Technician Level I-IMSA Certification HR 1 $123.12 $153.88 20 Roadway Lighting Technician Level I-IMSA Certification HR 1 $1,020.60 $126.09 21 Construction Laborer HR 1 $123.12 $173.37 Traffic Signal Senior Field Technician Level III(Lead)-IMSA 22 Certification (master system communication HR 8 $1,206.58 $1,519.93 experience/certification) 23 Traffic Signal Field Technician Level II-IMSA Certification HR 8 $1,149.12 $1,433.14 Section II: Extraordinary Maintenance Labor Total: $4,758.31 $4,819.03 Section III: Extraordinary Maintenance Labor and Materials m# Item Description Quantity Unit Price Total Price 24 Install 6x6 traffic loop(4 or less) EA 1 $713.07 $713.07 25 Install 6x6 traffic loop(more than 4) EA 1 $615.60 $615.60 26 Install bike loop 6x6 EA 1 $713.07 $713.07 27 Install 6'diameter circular loop(4 or less) EA 1 $713.07 $713.07 28 Install 6'diameter circular loop(more than 4) EA 1 $615.60 $615.60 29 Swap out video Detection Camera(City to provide replacement EA 1 $266.76 $266.76 camera) 30 Swap out Video Detection Camera(Contractor to provide City EA 1 $2,565.00 $2,565.00 specified Iteris RG4) 31 Fumish and Install No.3 1/3 pullbox EA 1 $1,077.30 $1,077.30 32 Furnish and install No.5 pullbox EA 1 $1,800.63 $1,800.63 33 Furnish and install No.6 pullbox EA 1 $1,872.45 $1,872.45 34 Install City furnished pedestrian signal head EA 1 L $179.55 $179.55 35 Furnish and install City specified pedestrian signal head EA 1 $1,005.48 $1,005.48 36 Install City furnished ADA push button EA 1 $46.17 $46.17 37 Furnish and install City specified ADA push button EA 1 $307.80 $307.80 38 Install City furnished NEMA conflict monitor EA 1 $266.76 $266.76 39 Install City furnished Traffic Signal Cabinet EA 1 $2,872.80 $2,872.80 40 Conduct Traffic Signal Cabinet operational test EA 1 $1,179.90 $1,179.90 41 Conduct Safety Light and ISNS night survey EA 1 $1,102.95 $1,102.95 42 Install City furnished regulatory sign on signal mast arm EA 1 $179.55 $179.55 43 Replace Type 1-A(10')pole EA 1 $1,231.20 $1,231.20 44 Adjust alignment of signal head on pole EA 1 $92.34 $92.34 Page 253 45 Adjust alignment of signal head on mast arm EA 1 $133.38 $133.38 46 Replace incandescent or LED Type Signal Indication with City EA 1 $89.26 $89.26 furnished LED Indication 47 Replace incandescent or LED Type Signal with contractor EA 1 $128.25 $128.25 supplied red,green or amber LED(City spec) 48 Replace ISNS panel with City furnished ISNS panel EA 1 $179.55 $179.55 49 Install City furnished ISNS EA 1 $533.52 $533.52 50 Furnish and install City specified 6'ISNS EA 1 $3,642.30 $3,642.30 51 Furnish and install City specified 8'ISNS EA 1 $4,437.45 $4,437.45 52 Install City furnished LED retrofit for ISNS EA 1 $179.55 $179.55 53 Furnish and install City specified LED retrofit for ISNS EA 1 $795.15 $795.15 54 Measure,order and install ISNS davit arm EA 1 $4,873.50 $4,873.50 55 Install City supplied ISNS davit arm and hang existing sign EA 1 $1,020.87 $1,020.87 56 Install and tune City provided ITERIS Video detection system for EA 1 $5,694.30 $5,694.30 8 phase intersection Section III:Extraordinary Maintenance Labor and Materials Total: $41,124.13 Section IV: Equipment Item# Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price 57 Pick-up Truck TRIP 1 $43.09 $43.09 58 30'Boom/Service Truck TRIP 1 $61.56 $61.56 59 50'Height Boom Truck TRIP 1 $359.10 $359.10 60 Crane Truck TRIP 1 $333.45 $333.45 61 Water Truck TRIP 1 $61.56 $61.56 62 Dump Truck TRIP 1 $61.56 $61.56 63 Concrete Saw TRIP 1 $15.39 $15.39 64 Complete Paint Rig TRIP 1 $169.29 $169.29 65 Jackhammer/Compressor TRIP 1 $15.39 $15.39 66 Trencher TRIP 1 $359.10 $359.10 67 Vacuum Truck TRIP 1 $61.56 $61.56 68 Backhoe TRIP 1 $4,360.50 $4,360.50 Section IV:Equipment Total: $5,901.55 Thank You, Page 254 Candace 7al&a tier Candace Gallaher Service Project Manager Yunex Traffic Page 255 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2020-030 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LIVID 4R Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $587,470 for FY 2025/26. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2020-030 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $587,470 for FY 2025/26. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. On April 1, 2020, City Council awarded a competitively bid contract (CO 2020-030) for LIVID 4R Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., of Irwindale, California, effective July 1, 2020 for a one (1) year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years through June 30, 2027. Currently, all sites are maintained at Service Level A. If approved, Amendment No. 5 to contract CO 2020-030 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2026, with a 2.9% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed "extra work" line items. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. ANALYSIS: Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during FY 2025/26. Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., is requesting a 2.9% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed "extra work" line items to cover increases in labor, material, and fuel costs. Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., continues to meet the services needs of the City and staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 2020-030 effective July 1, 2025 and approve the spending limit of$587,470 for FY 2025/26. Page 256 FISCAL IMPACT: The Proposed FY 2025/26 Budget includes$587,470 for LMD 4R Paseos, Parkways, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in account F134 CC319 SC2105. The contract spending limit of $587,470 includes a contingency of $88,120 for unforeseen work resulting from wind events or other emergencies. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, while providing high quality outdoor spaces. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Letter of Intent Page 2 Page 257 M A R I P 0 S A L A N D C A P E S I N C April 7, 2025 Lisa O'Brien Business Manager Public Works Services Department RE: Landscape Maintenance Contract Extension Renewal FY 2025/2026 for CO 2020-030 Level"A" Dear Miss O'Brien, This letter serves as a request to extend and amend our current landscape maintenance contract agreement for contract CO 2020-030 LIVID 4 parkway, paseo and median island landscape and irrigation maintenance at service Level "A", for an additional year of service ending June 301h, 2026 Mariposa Landscapes Inc.would like to hereby request a 2.9%CPI (Consumer Price Index) increase to be equally applied to the current contract price sites and the extra work rates.The CPI increase is based on the most recent publication for the month of February 2025 for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area. if granted the increase will become effective July 111, 2025. The current monthly compensation will change as follows: CO 2020-030 Level"A" Current Cost $31,422.46 per month FY2025/2026 Cost $32,333.71 per month ($388,004.52 per year)) I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for allowing Mariposa Landscape Inc.to provide quality landscape maintenance services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.We look forward to a long and successful business relationship for many years to come. R submitted, 5 R rto —Branc anager Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. Roberto.perez marl o- -ca.com (626)705-2921 (626)960-8477 fax ATTACHMENT 1 4;Sg TEL 800.794•94S8 • FAx 626 ■ 960• 8477 • www.mariposa-ca.com 6232 SANTOS DIAZ ST„ RWINDALE,CA 91702 * CA;=ONTRACTOR'S LIC q 592268 A,C-27,0-49 Our Core Values —Safety • Teanizvork . Quality . Integrity S � HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Mike McCliman, Fire Chief Andy Miller, Facilities Superintendent Mark Medina, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 6 to Contract No. 2020-107 with Champion Fire Systems for Fire Suppression System Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $130,000 for City and Fire District Facilities for FY 2025/2026. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council / Fire Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 6 to Contract No. 2020-107 with Champion Fire Systems extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $130,000 for City and Fire District facilities during FY 2025/2026. BACKGROUND: On October 7, 2020, the City Council and Board of Directors accepted the bids received for fire suppression system maintenance and awarded Contract No. 2020-107 to Champion Fire Systems. The contract has an option to renew in one year increments up to a total contract term of seven years ending June 30, 2027. With the fourth year coming to an end, staff is requesting the City Council and Board of Directors renew Contract No. 2020-107 with Champion Fire Systems for fire suppression system maintenance. ANALYSIS: Staff is requesting the City Council/ Fire Board renew Contract No. 2020-107 with Champion Fire Systems for fire suppression system maintenance. The scope of work for this contract includes testing, repair, and preventative maintenance for water-based systems, fire extinguishers, fire/smoke doors, kitchen hood systems, fire hose, and clean agent suppression systems. Champion Fire Systems has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing fire suppression system maintenance for the City and Fire District during FY 2025/2026 with no rate increase. Champion Fire Systems continues to provide great service to the City and Fire District. If approved, Amendment 6 to Contract No. 2020-107 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2026. All other terms of the contract will remain the same. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Page 259 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed FY 2025/2026 Budget includes sufficient funding for fire suppression system maintenance in several contract services line items. The contract spending limit of $130,000 includes a contingency of $51,370 for unforeseen work resulting from aging equipment. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring the City and Fire District facilities are property maintained. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 260 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers, Deputy Director of Public Works Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer Sonny Rodriguez, Maintenance Coordinator SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing Project as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Accept the Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing Project, Contract No. 2025-043, as complete. 2. Approve the final contract amount of$207,882 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond. 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $207,882, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. 5. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and release of the retention in the amount of$10,394.10, 35 days after acceptance. 6. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing FY 24-25 has assisted in the repair of uneven and/or rutted DG trail surfaces and concrete header curbs with lifts and/or gaps in the public right-of-way and in City maintained landscapes. As trees mature, their roots damage nearby header curb and lift DG trail surfaces. With the availability of LMD-2 funds, the City was able to significantly reduce the number of trail hazards that needed to be repaired/replaced. Page 261 Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $ 218,276.10 Publish Dates for Local Paper: February 21 st, 2025 & February 26,2025 Bid Opening: March 4th, 2025 Contract Award Date: March 191h, 2025 Low Bidder: Gentry General Engineering, Inc. Contract Amount: $207,882 Contingency: $10,394.10 Final Contract Amount: $ 207,882 Difference in Contract Amount: $0 ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. At the end of the one (1) year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the Public Works Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $196,900 with contingency were included in the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 adopted budget for this project in the LMD-2 F131 Fund. Bids received were higher than anticipated, an additional $21,376.10 for a total of$218,276.10 was required for construction and contingency. A balance of$10,394.10 remains in the project budget. These funds will be returned to the LMD-2 F131 Fund and made available for future Major Projects. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: By completing the Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing Project, the Public Works Services Department supports the City Council's Core Values to provide continuous improvement and a nurturing and high quality of life for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Page 2 Page 262 ATTACHMENT 1 Victoria Park Lane DG Resurfacing Project VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE + Almond St beer Creek ' ichalnnei • Hlllside Rd WIW&Rd HR15ide Rd e+ ■ . rey N■ I [,r ti N,jg5on Ave I I Wilson Ave n �•� Thorou9h4red`' > Chaffey •r tD • College School x �F Banyan St Banyan St BgmySt Catch •.} Lemon Ave Lemon Ave hinge pr Vin } Basin � • � Alta Lama Dr • 9 Alta Loma �n d' W C • N victoria St Grapeland > Etiwanda ] N K ¢ Upland Hills ��. = � m � W m Country club Base Line Rd L 5 r C C • ■ u O Q •!!! y ¢ E c � 14th St tam I s m A u a • ¢ ID 66 a Rancho rCucamonga 6 a row Hwy w a ° w ; N y m Arrow Rte Arrow Rte 1 # a I ro rn m 9th St m North Jersey Blvd Whlttran Ave u Kalser E 8th S! �8th St Cucamanga St —*Olt E 7th St � • p IV + a � � i Q • E 6th St ro ro 6th St y O • FL � } < _ E dth 5� rn • . , . . . .B"gt• '1Wk 9t • — rat}5t• San Bernardino Ave x _ Project Site ED N Page 263 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Danny Akers, Deputy Director of Public Works Richard Favela, St/Storm Maintenance Superintendent John Standi, Streets Coordinator Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept the CDBG Concrete Rehabilitation Project FY 24-25 as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Accept the CDBG Concrete Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 2025-022, as complete. 2. Approve the final contract amount of$458,076.97 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond. 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of$419,094.85, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. 5. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and release of the retention in the amount of$22,903.85, 35 days after acceptance. BACKGROUND: The CDBG Concrete Rehabilitation Project assisted in reducing the backlog of needed sidewalk repair/replacement projects. As trees mature, their roots damage nearby sidewalks, curb and gutters, and driveway approaches. With the availability of Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City was able to significantly reduce the number of residential sidewalks, curb and gutter, and driveway approaches that needed to be repaired/replaced. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $750,000.00 Publish Dates for Local Paper: December 3, 2024 and December 10, 2024 Bid Opening: January 14, 2025 Contract Award Date: February 4, 2025 Page 264 Low Bidder: Gentry General Engineering, Inc. Contract Amount: $419,094.85 Contingency: $41,990.48 Final Contract Amount: $458,076.97 Difference in Contract Amount: $38,982.12 9.3% ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of additional sections of damaged concrete sidewalk being removed and replaced. FISCAL IMPACT: There was no negative impact to the General Fund as a result of this project. Funds for this project were appropriated from the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation. An appropriation, in the amount of $750,000.00, was requested from CDBG fund balance to F204 CC314 SC7004 7000 GR-000018. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: By removing and replacing damaged sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and drive approaches, the CDBG Concrete Rehabilitation Project provided continuous improvement and a nurturing and high quality of life for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Page 2 Page 265 ATTACHMENT 1 CDBG CONCRETE REHABILITATION PROJECT FY 24-25 VARIOUS LOCATIONS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 5 1'i "W N11 fD rllcnar111 St Deer Creek [honnef I i ` Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Hillside Rd I 1 • � W4l5on Ave Wilson Ave ' ' Tharo��h ■ed 5 y Chaffey . � to • College School ■ x 'Ole, � Banyan St Banyan St ggviSt Coach + �. Lemon Ave � Lemon Ave yinu4e4Dr Vin�� } 805in I` � �Or d • n Alta Lorna Dr +� 1° Alta Loma - ,+ • N V / n us * Uiuoria SrGrapel I � Etiwanda m d W f C Upland Hills •�+ � * m ¢ Ceuntry Cluh ease Une Rd qa .0 I a ` } q a ro •'{■ E a 141h St h I m a Y � U m J . 15 y 66 � a Rancho Cucamonga .� Q K raw Hwy { Arrow Rce Arrow Rte w F { a ro I rn m 9th St m North Jersey Blvd WhittraW Ave Kaiser St E 8th JF ■ ■ 8th St Cucamonga _ E 7th 5t y IV z y n o 10 m • x r a ' i E 6th 5# x @ C o 6th St I F 4th S rn � � � J San Bernardino Ave Project Site El Page 266 S � HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director Patricia Bravo-Valdez, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services Justine Finn, Records Management Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions Adopting Updated Records Retention Schedules, Authorizing Destruction and Rescinding Previous Records Retention Schedules. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-063) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-020) (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council and Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District adopt Resolutions adopting updated Records Retention Schedules, authorizing destruction of certain obsolete City Records, and rescinding previous Records Retention Schedules. BACKGROUND: The Records Retention Schedules of the City/Fire District were last revised in 2024. These schedules play a vital role in maintaining an efficient records management program. They help the City/Fire District in identifying which records need to be kept in the office or temporary storage, which records have historical or research value, and which records can be discarded as they no longer hold any administrative, operational, fiscal, or legal significance. ANALYSIS: It is recommended by general records management principles to periodically review and update retention schedules. The City/Fire District updates its Records Retention Schedules every two years or sooner if necessary. The City Clerk Services Department collaborated closely with the City's records consultant, various City Departments, and the City Attorney's Office to update the schedules. The revisions proposed for this year's schedules have been made in accordance with new laws since 2024, as well as best practices in the industry. The attached Records Retention Schedules have been updated, and changes have been marked in colored and strike-out format. These changes in law and best practices include the following revisions to schedules: adding a video monitoring retention category to the Department of Innovation and Technology Retention Schedule, updates to schedules to reflect current organization structure, modifications made to records descriptions to be more concise, and updates to legal citations to reflect current laws and regulations. Page 267 Staff recommends the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve the revised Records Retention Schedules and Resolutions to ensure compliance with legal and administrative retention requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: The City/Fire District will realize savings in records storage expenses. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item supports the City Council's Core Values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders, and the relentless pursuit of improvement by taking actions to proactively keep records retention schedules current with changes in law and best practices to ensure compliance with state law. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2025-063 and Records Retention Schedules Attachment 2 — Resolution No. FD 2025-020 and Records Retention Schedules Page 2 Page 268 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES, AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 039 WHEREAS, the objective of a records management program and retention schedule is to control costs, increase space availability, streamline information and consistent record keeping systems, and improve productivity by providing records and information in a timely manner to individuals requiring them; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 34090 provides a procedure whereby any City record which has served its purpose and is no longer required may be destroyed; and WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted records retention guidelines for various government records; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed and approves the Records Retention Schedule as evidenced by his signature on this Resolution, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 34090; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted records retention schedules, the most recent in 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. Section 2. Resolution No. 2024-039 is hereby rescinded. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the revised City-wide Records Retention Schedules set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, as the City's Records Retention Schedules. Records identified in the Schedules set forth in Exhibit A that are no longer required by law to be maintained and are no longer needed for any City purpose, are hereby authorized to be destroyed as provided by California Government Code Section 34090 and in accordance with the provisions of the Schedules, upon the request of a Department Head and with the consent in writing of the Department Director, Deputy City Manager, City Clerk Services Director, City Manager and City Attorney, without further action by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 4. Minor updates are hereby authorized to be made to the Records Retention Schedules, without any further action by the City Council, that do not alter the retention period or delete records specified in the schedule, with the consent of the City Clerk Services Director, City Attorney and City Manager. Minor updates are defined as improvement in Records Descriptions, changes in Office of Record / Inactive timeframes (but not the Total Retention Period), whether to Image a record, and the Justification. Section 5. The term "records" as used herein shall include records, documents, instructions, books, microforms, electronic files, magnetic tape, optical media, instruments, Resolution No. 2025-063 - Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 269 writings, and/or papers, regardless of media, as defined by the California Public Records Act, and as those terms are used in Government Code Section 34090, et seq. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. Section 7. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. Resolution No. 2025-063 - Page 2 of 3 Page 270 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2025. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Sevy, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 20th day of August 2025. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Executed this 21St day of August 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Kim Sevy, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon Resolution No. 2025-063 - Page 3 of 3 Page 271 HOW TO USE RETENTION SCHEDULES ©1995-2025 Gladwell Governmental Services,Inc.(909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission A legend explaining the information presented in the retention schedule; please read this for an explanation of every column. The specified retention period applies regardless of the media of the record: If a record is stored on paper and electronic format (a computer file on a hard drive), all electronic and paper records should be destroyed (or deleted / erased) after the specified period of time has elapsed and authorization to destroy has been obtained. Copies or duplicates of records should never be retained longer than the prescribed period for the official (original) record, and drafts and copies should be destroyed as soon as they are no longer required. The term "records" shall include all records as defined by the California Public Records Act. STRUCTURE: CITY-WIDE. DEPARTMENTS & DIVISIONS The City-wide retention schedule includes those records all departments have in common (e-mails, letters, memorandums, purchase orders, etc.). These records are NOT repeated in the Department retention schedule, unless that department is the Office of Record. Each department has a separate retention schedule that describes the records that are unique to their department, or for which they are the Office of Record. The department retention schedules may be organized by Division within that Department. If a record is not listed in your department retention schedule, refer to the City-wide retention schedule, or look in the index to the schedules (provided after approval.) BENEFITS This retention schedule has been developed by Diane R. Gladwell, MMC, an expert in Municipal Government records, and will provide the City with the following benefits: • Reduce administrative expenses, expedite procedures • Free office space and computer storage space • Reduce the cost of records storage— paper and electronic • Eliminate duplication of effort within the City • Find records faster • Determine what media should be used to store records AUTHORIZATION TO DESTROY RECORDS (Paper or Electronic Records); Destruction or deletion of an official (ori inal) record that has exceeded its retention period must be authorized prior to destruction or deletion. • If there is a minimum retention ("Minimum 2 years"), the destruction/deletion must be authorized before it is destroyed, as it is an official (original) record. Copies, drafts, notes and non-records do NOT require authorization, and can be destroyed "When No Longer Required." • If there is NOT a minimum retention ("When No Longer Required"), it does NOT need to be authorized prior to destruction, as it is a preliminary draft, copy, or the Content is NOT Substantive. On every page of the schedules (near the top,just under the column headings) are important instructions, including instructions regarding holds on destroying records. "Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods (retention resumes after settlement or resolution)." Page 272 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE LEGEND ©1995—2025 Gladwell Governmental Services,Inc.(909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission OFR(Office of Record): The department that keeps the Official (original or"record copy") record for its retention period, then authorizes destruction. Usually, it is the department that originates the record. The official (original) record may be the paper/ hard copy version of the record; however the electronic record may be the official (original) record. See the "Destroy Paper after Imaged &QC'd" below for the Legal Requirements for the electronic record to be the official (original) record. Records Description: The record series (a group of like records). Non-Record: Documents, studies, books and pamphlets produced by outside agencies, preliminary drafts not retained in the ordinary course of business. Retention/Disposition: Active (guideline): How long the file remains in the immediate office area Inactive (guideline): How long the file is in off-site storage, stored electronically in accordance with law (see below) Total Retention: The total number of years the record is retained For file folders containing documents with different retention timeframes, use the document with the longest retention time. P = Permanent indefinite = No fixed or specified retention period; used for databases, because the data fields are interrelated and certain data may require minimum retention. Vital? = Those records that are needed for basic operations in the event of a disaster. Media Options (guideline)terms used in State law: Mag = Electronic Computer Magnetic Media (Hard drives, Networks, USB Drives, Cloud, etc.) Mfr= Microforms (aperture cards, microfilm, microfiche, or jackets) Ppr= Paper OD = Optical Disk or other Unalterable Media which does not allow changes Scan /Import (guideline): "S" indicates the record should be scanned into the document imaging system; "I" indicates the record should be electronically imported into the document imaging system; "M" indicates the record was microfilmed Destroy Paper after Imaged &QC'd (quality checked) /Trustworthy Electronic Record: "Yes" means the electronic record may serve as the OFFICIAL record (and the paper version may be destroyed, or the record may be electronically generated and never exist in paper format) IF (these are the legal requirements for the electronic record to serve as the official (original) record) the electronic record is also placed on Unalterable Media, Immutable Cloud Media, Optical Disk (OD), DVD-R, CD-R, Blue-ray-R, or WORM, or microfilmed)which is stored in a safe &separate location. Employees are required to Quality Check ("QC'd") both the images and the indexes, and ensure the electronic record contains all significant details from the original and be an adequate substitute for the original document for all purposes; other legal mandates may apply. Legend for legal citations (§: Section) B&P: Business&Professions Code(CA) CBC: California Building Code CC: Civil Code(CA) CCP: Code of Civil Procedure(CA) CCR: California Code of Regulations(CA) CFC: California Fire Code CFR: Code of Federal Regulations(US) EC: Elections Code(CA) EVC: Evidence Code(CA) FA: Food &Agriculture Code FC: Family Code(CA) FTB: Franchise Tax Board (CA) GC: Government Code(CA) H&S: Health&Safety Code(CA) HUD: Housing & Urban Develop. (US) LC: Labor Code (CA) Ops. Cal.Atty. Gen..: Attorney General Opinions (CA) PC: Penal Code (CA) PRC Public Resources Code R&T: Revenue&Taxation Code (CA) UFC: Uniform Fire Code USC: United States Code(US) VC: Vehicle Code(CA) W&I: Welfare& Institutions Code (CA) Page 273 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-1 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Accident, Incident, Injury CITY-WIDE Used b ALL Departments Human Copies- Copies- reports: PUBLIC& Mag, Resources/ When No When No Yes: After Copies retained for reference; Risk CW-001 EMPLOYEES,with associated Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Management MSDS, if a chemical was Required Required Ppr involved Accounts Payable, Invoices, Petty Cash, Warrant Requests, Copies- Copies- Mag, All originals go to Finance Mfr, OD, S/I etc. When No When No Yes: Before Yes: After Finance CW-002 Longer Longer Payment QC&OD (these are copies); GC ALL backup is forwarded to Required Required Ppr §§34090.7, 60200 Finance Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-002.1 Administrative Hearings 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090 Ppr Brown Act challenges must be Affidavits of Publications/ filed within 30 or 90 days of Lead Dept. CW-003 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I Public Hearing Notices/Legal Mag' Yes: After action; Statute of Limitations Advertising/Affidavits of p P r QC&OD on Municipal Government Posting actions is 3-6 months; GC §§34090, 54960.1(c)(1) Copies- Copies- Agenda Packets/Staff When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CW-004 Reports: City Council Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required Copies- Copies- r es. r,iiei Agreements&Contracts ALL When No When No Mag, QC&OD Ensure the City Clerk receives City Clerk CW-005 Mfr, OD, S/I lien— all original agreements; GC ORIGINALS Longer Longer Required Required Ppr 6e4etie §§34090.7, 60200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 274 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-2 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Some Grants require audits; Grants covered by a Agreements&Contracts: Consolidated Action Plan are ADMINISTRATIVE FILES 10 years or Completion + required for 5 years; Uniform After Admin. Requirements for (with Grant Funding) 10 years or Yes: After Lead Dept. Funding After Funding Mag, QC&OD Grants to Local Governments (Managing the Agency Yes: Before is 3 years from expenditure Ppr Agreement/ CW-006 (Correspondence, Insurance Completion Audit, if Agency Audit, Completion Mfr, OD, S/I report or final payment of Contract Certificates, Project Administration, Project required, if required, grantee or subgrantee; 2 CFR Schedules, Certified Payrolls, whichever i a whichever is s longer 200.334; 24 CFR 91.105(h), longer 92.505, 570.490, &570.502(a), Invoices, Logs, RFP, etc.) 29 CFR 97.42;-OMB Circular A-110&A-133; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq.; GC§8546.7 Covers E&O Statute of Limitations(insurance Agreements&Contracts: certificates are filed with Lead Dept. ADMINISTRATIVE FILES Yes: After agreement); Published Audit (Managing the Completion + Yes: Before Mag, QC&OD Standards=4-7 years; Statute Agreement CW-007 (Correspondence, Project Completion 10 years 10 years Completion Mfr, OD, S/I of Limitations: Contracts& / Contract) Administration, Project Ppr Gemp4et+e Spec's=4 years, Wrongful Schedules, Certified Payrolls, R Death=comp. +5 years, Invoices, Logs, RFP, etc.) Developers=comp. + 10 years; CCP§337 et. seq., GC §34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 275 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-3 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Agreements&Contracts: UNSUCCESSFUL BIDS, Lead Dept. UNSUCCESSFUL (Managing the PROPOSALS or RESPONSES r, O CW-008 Yes: After 2 years 2 years Mf OD, S/I GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Agreement/ to RFPs (Request for Ppr QC&OD Contract) Proposals)and/or RFQs (Request for Qualifications) that don't result in a contract Copies- Copies- Audits/Audit Reports/Annual When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Finance CW-009 Financial Reports Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD Copies; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required CW-010 Bids: See Agreements& Contracts Department Staff Meetings Mag'(all Records, including Yes: After GC§§34090 et seq., 60201 et Staffing Dept. CW-011 Minutes and Recordings, 2 Years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD seq. Department Awards) Ppr Boards, Commissions, & Committees: External When No When No Mag, Organizations Yes: After CW-012 Longer Longer Mfr, OD. S/I QC&OD Non-records (e.g. County Board of Required Required Ppr Supervisors) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 276 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-4 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Brown Act challenges must be Advisory Bodies Formed by Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After filed within 30 or 90 days of Staffing Dept. CW-013 CITY COUNCIL years years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD action; GC§§34090, AGENDAS,AGENDA Ppr 54960.1(c)(1) PACKETS Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Department preference; State Staffing Dept. CW-014 Advisory Bodies Formed by 2 years 2 years Mag law only requires for 30 days; CITY COUNCIL 99 AUDIO RECORDINGS of GC§54953.5(b) Meetings/Audio Tapes Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Department Preference;Video Advisory Bodies Formed by Minimum 3 Minimum 3 Mag recording of meetings are only Staffing Dept. CW-015 CITY COUNCIL years years gg required for 90 days if audio or VIDEO RECORDINGS of another record is made; GC Meetings/Audio Tapes §§34090.7, 34090 Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Mag, Yes: After Staffing Dept. CW-016 Advisory Bodies Formed by P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. CITY COUNCIL Ppr No MINUTES&BYLAWS Copies- Copies- Yes: Mag, Yes: After Final must be filed with County Finance CW-017 Budgets- Finals When No When No Current Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD&Auditor; GC§§34090.7, 60200, Longer Longer Fiscal Year Ppr years 40802, 53901 Required Required RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 277 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-5 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Cash Receipts Detail/Backup Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, Finance CW-018 /Accounts Receivable Detail/ Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Yes: After GC§§34090.7, 60200 Refund Detail Required Required Ppr Lead Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After City preference; GC§§34090, (Requesting) CW-019 City Attorney Opinions years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD 60201 et seq. Dept. Ppr Copies- Copies- Human When No When No Yes: After Yes: Before Mag, Resources/ Longer Longer QC&OD CW-020 Claims Final Mfr, OD, S/I GC§§34090.7, 34090.E Risk Required Required €nal Management (Final (Final Disposition Ppr ion Disposition) Disposition) City preference; Statute of Limitations for personal Lead ,Mag property,fraud, etc. is 3 years; Complaints/Concerns from Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: After (Responding) CW-021 Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Claims must be filed within 6 Dept. Citizens years years Ppr months; CCP§340 et seq., 342, GC§§911.2, 34090, 60201 et seq. Send to Send to Mag, Human Yes: After Resources CW-022 Complaints Against Employees Human Human Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Resources Resources Ppr CW-023 Contracts: See Agreements Copies- Copies- Copies or duplicates of any When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-024 record Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 278 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-6 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Correspondence- ROUTINE (IF CONTENT relates in a SUBSTANTIVE way to the conduct of the public's Dept. that business) Authors Only if content relates in a substantive way to the conduct Document (e.g.Administrative Files, Mag, Yes: After of thepublic's business; City of or CW-025 Ghrenolegmeal _ilex e-mail/ 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD San Jose v. Superior Court Receives the email with SUBSTANTIVE Ppr (2017)2 Cal.5th 608; GC City's Original content, General Files, Letters, §§34090, 60201 Document Memorandums, Miscellaneous Reports, Press Releases, Public Records Requests, Reading Files,We*iRg Files, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 279 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-7 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Correspondence- TRANSITORY/ Electronic and paper records PRELIMINARY DRAFTS, are categorized,filed and Interagency and Intraagency retained based upon the Memoranda NOT retained in CONTENT of the record. the ordinary course of business Records where either the Content relates in a Content NOT Substantive, or SUBSTANTIVE way to the NOT made or retained for the conduct of the public's purpose of preserving the informational content for future business, or ARE made or Dept. that retained for the purpose of Authors reference preserving the informational Document When No When No content for future reference or CW-026 (e.g. calendars, checklists, e- Lon Longer Mag, mail/email e� Longer social media g g Ppr are SAVED by placing them Receives the Required Required in an electronic or paper City's Original posting, flyers, invitations, (project)file folder and Document instant messaging, inventories, logs, mailing lists, meeting retained for the applicable room registrations, speaker retention period. If not cards, staff videoconference mentioned here, consult the chats, notes and recordings, City Attorney to determine if a supply inventories,telephone record is considered transitory messages,text messages, /preliminary draft. GC transmittal letters,thank yous, §§34090,-64 Ops. Cal.Atty. requests from other cities, Gen. 317 (1981));City of San undeliverable envelopes/ Jose v. Superior Court(2017) returned mail,visitors logs, 2 Cal.5th 608 voice mails,webpages, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 280 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-8 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Deeds, Easements, Final Copies- Copies- Orders of Condemnations, When No When No r, OD, Yes: After Send all originals to the City City Clerk CW-027 Liens, Recorded Documents, Longer Longer Ppr S/ I QC&OD Clerk; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Rights of Ways(All) Required Required Deposit Accounts/Trust Close+ 5 Close+ 5 Yes: After Mag, Department preference; meets Lead Dept. CW-028 Accounts/Refundable Mfr, OD, all auditing standards; GC Deposits years years Ppr QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Transitory or source records not retained in the ordinary 2 years After 2 years After Mag, course of business; CHIP Lead Dept. CW-029 DMV Pull Notices Superseded or Superseded Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After audits every 2 years; Bureau of Separated or Separated Ppr QC&OD National Affairs recommends 2 years for all supplementary Personnel records; GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. As long as the drafts and notes When No When No Mag, are not retained in the"Regular Drafts&Notes: Drafts that are Yes: After Course of Business". Consult Lead Dept. CW-030 revised (retain final version) Longer Longer Mfr, OD, all Required Required Ppr QC&OD the City Attorney to determine if a record is considered a draft. GC§§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 281 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-9 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). The Lead Department should print out historical documents (or save source data)prior to GIS Database/Data/Layers When No When No Mag, Yes: After replacing the data, if they Lead Dept. CW-031 (both City-wide and Longer Longer Yes Mfr, OD, S/I require the data or output for Specialized) Required Required Ppr historical&OD historical purposes; Department Preference (Preliminary documents); GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. et seq. Lead Dept. Grants (UNSUCCESSFUL Mag' Yes: After (Managing the CW-032 Applications, Correspondence) 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Grant) Ppr Grants/CDBG/Reimbursable Meets auditing standards; Claims/FEMA Claims/OES Grants covered by a Claims(SUCCESSFUL Consolidated Action Plan are Reports, other records required After required for 5 years; Uniform to pass the funding agency's Funding After Funding Admin. Requirements for Lead Dept. audit, if required) Agency Agency Audit, Mag, Grants to Local Governments(Managing the CW-033 2 years Audit, if if required- Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After is 3 years from expenditure Grant) Applications (successful), grant Required - Minimum 5 Ppr QC&OD report or final payment of agreement, program rules, Minimum 5 years grantee or subgrantee; 2 CFR regulations&procedures, 200.334; 24 CFR 91.105(h), reports to grant funding years 92.505, 570.490, &570.502(a), agencies, correspondence, 29 CFR 97.42; OMB Circular A- audit records, completion 110&A-133; GC§§34090, records 60201 et seq.; GC§8546.7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 282 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-10 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Send all grievances to Human Copies- Copies- Resources; All State and Human Grievances and Informal When No When No Yes: Before Mag, Yes: After Federal laws require retention CW-034 Mfr, OD, S/I until final disposition of formal Resources Complaints (Employees) Longer Longer Disposition Ppr QC&OD complaint; State requires 2 Required Required years after action is taken; GC §§12946, 12960, 34090 Litigation Files/Lawsuits/ Court Case Files Final Final Yes: Until Yes: After Mag, Department preference; CCP Lead Dept. CW-035 Resolution + 5 Resolution + 5 Settlement Mfr, OD, S/I §§337 et seq.; GC§§911.2, Send Final Settlement years years Ppr QC&OD 34090, 34090.6 Agreements to the City Clerk Wh n N Wh r N i „ o ci•ns i Tirv,o Off �-.-r,e,-,-.e Yes: ns+,,. ain L , Dpr GW 036 �s Meager Longer — M#� 9B S�4 T�� Required RequiFed P-Pf QS&QQ et-& c- Previous MSDS may be obtained from a service; MSDS may be destroyed as long as a Material Safety Data Sheet record of the chemical/ (MSDS)/Safety Data Sheet substance/agent,where& (SDS) Chemical Use Report While Mag, Yes-After when it was used is maintained Lead Dept. CW-037 Form (or records of the Chemical In 30 years 30 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD for 30 years;Applies to chemical/substance/agent, Use Ppr qualified employers; Claims where&when it was used) can be made for 30 years for toxic substance exposures; 8 CCR 3204(d)(1)(B)(2 and 3), 29 CFR 1910.1020(d)(1)(1), GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 283 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-11 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: After.Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-038 Minutes-City Council When No When NoLonger Longer Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Required Required Ppr Ale §§34090.7, 60200 Copies- Copies- Return any whole unused Municipal Code(these are When No When No Yes: Mag, Yes: After codes to the City Clerk; City Clerk CW-039 copies) Longer Longer Current Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Originals maintained by City Required Required Original Ppr No Clerk Permanently; GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. When No When No Mag, Yes: After Non-records-may be obtained Lead Dept. CW-040 Newspaper Clippings Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I from the newspaper company; Required Required Ppr QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Notices: Public Hearing Mag, Statute of Limitations on Staffing Dept. CW-041 Notices and Proofs of 2 years 2 years Mfr. OD, all Yes: After Municipal Government actions Publications Ppr QC&OD is 3-6 months; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, Yes: After.Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-042 Ordinances -City Council Longer Longer Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Required Required Ppr NO §§34090, 60201 et seq. Human Send to Send to Mag, Resources/ Yes: After Risk CW-043 OSHA Inspections or Citations Human Human Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Management Resources Resources Ppr Ensure records kept in Human Personnel Files (Department- Do Not Retain Do Not Retain Before Mag' Yes: After Department files comply with Resources CW-044 level Files) in in Separation Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD City policy(all originals are Departments Departments Ppr sent to Human Resources); GC§§34090.7, 60200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 284 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-12 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Shred After Shred After Notes maintained in a separate Incorporation Incorporation folder to be incorporated intonto into Before Mag,i Personnel Files(Supervisor's Yes: After performance evaluation, or to Lead Dept. CW-045 Notes) Performance Performance Annual Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD document progressive Evaluation or Evaluation or Evaluation Ppr Documented Documented discipline; GC§§34090 et seq., Discipline Discipline 60201 et seq. Preliminary Drafts; (retention is When No When No Mag, placed on the record the Lead Dept. CW-046 Unused Photographs Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After photograph is used in- Required Required Ppr QC&OD Brochure, Report, etc.); destroy unnecessary photographs. GC§§34090 Public Relations/Press Mag' Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-047 Releases 2 years 2 years Mfr,pOD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Mag, Yes: After Department preference; GC Lead Dept. CW-048 Purchase Orders/Requisitions 2 years 3 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Ppr Lead Dept. Real Estate Appraisal Reports: Mag, Yes: After Not accessible to the public; (Who Ordered CW-049 Property NOT purchased, 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ 1 QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 7928.705 the Appraisal) Loans not funded, etc. Ppr Not accessible to the public Lead Dept. Real Estate Appraisal Reports: Mag, until purchase has been Minimum 3 Minimum 5 Yes: After completed; meets municipal (Who Ordered CW-050 Purchased Property, Funded 2 years years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD government auditing the Appraisal) Loans Ppr standards; GC§§34090, 60201 7928.705 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 285 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-13 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Records Destruction Lists/ Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, City Clerk CW-051 Certificate of Records Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Yes: After GC§§34090.7, 60200 Destruction Required Required Ppr Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule.)Standard Operating When No When No Mag, Procedures(SOPs), Studies or Yes: After CW-052 Reports(if not provided in the Longer Longer Mfr. OD, S/I QC&OD Non-Records schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Required Required Ppr Produced by OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS (League of California Cities, Chamber of Commerce, etc.) Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule. Mfr, OD, S/ I Standard Operating Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Lead Dept. CW-053 Yes: After Department preference; GC Procedures(SOPs), Studies or years years Ppr QC&OD §34090 Reports(if not provided in the schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Produced by YOUR Department RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 286 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-14 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule.)Standard Operating When When Mag' Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-054 Mfr, OD, S/I Copies; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Procedures(SOPs), Studies or Superseded Superseded Ppr QC&OD Reports (if not provided in the schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Produced by OTHER Departments CW-055 Reference or Working Files: See Correspondence Administratively and Reports and Studies Mag, Yes: After Historically significant, Lead Dept. CW-056 (Historically significant-e.g., 10 years P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD therefore retained Zoning Studies) Ppr 10 years permanently; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Reports and Studies (other Mag, Yes: After Department preference; Lead Dept. CW-057 than Historically significant 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Information is outdated after 10 fepefts-e.g.Annual Reports) Ppr years; GC§34090 Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: After Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-058 Resolutions-City Council When No When No Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Longer Longer Ppr Ne §§34090.7, 60200 Required Required Special Projects/Subject Files Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After Department Preference; GC Lead Dept. CW-059 I Issue Files years years Mfrr,,pOD, S/I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 287 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-15 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Surveys/Questionnaires(that the City issues) If a summary of the data is Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-060 compiled,the survey forms are 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. considered a draft or transitory Ppr QC&OD record, and can be destroyed as drafts (When No Longer Required) Time Cards/Time Sheets Copies- Copies- Mag, Finance/ When No When No Yes: After Payroll CW-061 (Finance keeps the originals Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 et seq. with employee signatures) Required Required Ppr 2 years 2 nears Salaried employees do not Time Off Requests/Leave �^� When Mag• have timecards;Rre4+a�+aar q Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-062 Slips/Time Off Requests Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I drafts(the tame Gard ;s the+;.,.,l Required d Ppr QC&OD Feeerd); GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 288 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-16 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department preference; Ethics, Harassment&Workplace Violence Training is 5 years; Training Presented by City Calif. Labor Division is required Staff-ALL COURSE to keep their OSHA records 7 RECORDS years; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA Yes: After (Age)requires 3 years for Lead Dept. CW-063 2 years 5 years 7 years Mf O (Attendance Rosters or sign-in r, OD, S/I QC&OD promotion, demotion,transfer, sheets, Outlines and Materials; Where selection, or discharge; State includes Ethics, Harassment Ppr +aaet+ve Law requires 4 years for Prevention, Workplace personnel actions; 8 CCR Violence &Safety Training& §3203 et seq., 29 CFR Tailgates) 1627.3(b)(4), LC§6429(c); GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 53235.2(b), 53237.2(b); LC §6401.9(f), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 289 ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ANIMAL SERVICES Page AS-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 ears since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ANIMAL SERVICES Indefinite- Indefinite- Animal Mag, Mf Yes: After Department preference; Data is Services AS-001 Animal Registration Database Minimum 3 Minimum 3 OD, Ppr SS�II QC&OD interrelated; GC§34090 years years When No When No Considered transitory/ Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After preliminary draft(the database is Services AS-002 Animal Registration Report Longer Longer _Ppr S/I QC&OD the original); GC§34090, GC Required Required §6252 Animal Mag, M� Yes: After Services AS-003 Animal Trap Deposit Receipts 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. Animal Bite Reports/Rabies Control Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC r QC&OD Services AS-004 Records 3 years 3 years Yes OD P all p §34090 et seq. Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 3 years is required; FA Services AS-005 Clinics: Spay and Neuter 3 years 3 years O Ppr S/I QC&OD §32003(e), CCP§§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC§34090 Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 3 years is required; FA Services AS-006 Drug Logs 3 years 3 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD §32003(e), CCP§§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC§34090 Investigations/Problem Files Animal Resolution + Resolution + Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Services AS-007 (barking, loose dogs, dangerous 4ears 4 ears r all II QC&OD dog reports, etc.) y y OD Ppr §34090 et seq. Animal Medical Records, Surgical Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 3 years is required; FA Services AS-008 Records,X-rays 3 years 3 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD §32003(e), CCP§§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC§34090 Animal Meet and Greet/Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 3 years is required; FA Services AS-009 Adoption Contracts 3 years 3 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD §32003(e), CCP§§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC§34090 Notices to Comply,Warning Animal Mag, Mf Yes: After Department preference; GC Services AS-010 Letters/Notices/Citation Books 3 years 3 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD §34090 (Off leash, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 290 Ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ANIMAL SERVICES Page AS-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 ears since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, com taints, claims, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Animal Mag, Mfr Yes: After Services AS-011 Officer's Daily Log 2 years 2 years _Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§34090, GC§6252 3 years is required for animal Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After treatment records; FA§32003(e), Services AS-012 Rabies Vaccination Clinics 3 years 3 years Yes OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD PC§597.1(d); CCP§§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC§34090 Record of All Efforts to Contact Animal Mag, Mfr Yes: After FA§§31108.3 and 31752.1; GC Services AS-012.5 Owner and/or Microchip's 2 years 2 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD §34090 Primary Registrant 3 years is required; FA Animal Rescue Partnerships/Foster Mag, Mf Yes: After §32003(e), PC§597.1(d); CCP Services AS-013 Care Partnerships 3 years 3 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD §§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC §34090 Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Services AS-014 Ride-a-Long Waivers 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. Strays/Incoming Animals/ 3 years is required; FA Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After §32003(e), PC§597.1(d); CCP Services AS-015 Impound Records/ Impound 3 years 3 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD §§336(a), 337 et. seq., GC Cards/"Relinquishments" §34090 Animal Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Services AS-016 Volunteer Hours 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 291 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT Page BL-1 (Building & Safety, Community Improvement) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). BUILDING&SAFETY Yes: After Building & Address Assignments/ Mag, Department Preference; GC Safety BL-001 Changes/Corrections P P Mfrr,,pOD, S/I QC&SOD §34090 Building & gL-002 Address Files/Building r D, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC P P Yes(all) Mf Safety Permits r, O QC&OD §34090, H&S§19850 Ppr Data is interrelated; Permits are Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I Building & Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag' Yes: After required for the Life of the BL-003 Building Permit Database Safety Permanent Permanent Ppr QC&OD Building ; GC§34090; H&S §19850 Upon Upon Department preference; Mag Expiration, , Building & Building Plans-Cancelled, Expiration, Yes: After Preliminary drafts not retained in BL-004 Cancellation Mfr, OD, S/ I Q the ordinary course of business; Safety Expired or Withdrawn Cancellation or Ppr C&OD CBC§104.7; H&S§19850, GC or Withdrawal Withdrawal §34090 Building Plans- Finalled- Department Preference; Law INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, requires for the life of the BL-005 P P Yes (all) Mfr, OD S/I Building & MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS, Mag' Yes: After building for commercial and , Safety PLACES OF PUBLIC Pp r QC&OD common interest dwellings only; ACCOMMODATION,TENANT CBC 104.7& 107.5, IMPROVEMENTS I I L H&S§19850, GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 292 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT Page BL-2 (Building & Safety, Community Improvement) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaints, claims, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department preference; Plans need not be filed for: (a)Single or multiple dwellings not more than two stories and basement in height.(b)Garages and other structures appurtenant to buildings described under Building Plans- Finalled- subdivision (a).(c) Farm or ranch BL Building & SINGLE FAMILY Mag' Yes: After buildings. Safety -006 RESIDENTIAL-SFR and P P Yes MfrP p OD, S/ I QC&OD (d)Any one-story building where APPURTENANCES the span between bearing walls does not exceed 25 feet. The exemption in this subdivision does not, however, apply to a steel frame or concrete building. CBC requires 180 days from completion date; CBC 104.7& 107.5, H&S§19850, GC§34090 Yes: After Building & California Building Code/ When Mag, Attorney preference for Safety BL-007 California Standard Code (12 Superseded P P Mfr. OD. S/I QC&OD reconstruction issues; GC Parts) Ppr §50022.6 Building & gL-008 Certificate of Occupancy P P Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/ I Yes: After Department Preference; GC Safety (CofO) QC&OD §34090 Ppr Construction Notices/ Building & Inspection Notices Mag' Yes: After 2 years 2 years Mfr. OD, S/I GC§34090 BL-009 Safety (correction notices, compliance Ppr QC&OD orders, stop work notices, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 293 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT Page BL-3 (Building & Safety, Community Improvement) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaints, claims, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Building & When When Mag' Yes: After Safety BL-010 Plan Check Comments Finalled Finalled Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Preliminary Drafts; GC§34090 When No When No Mag, Building & Yes: After Preliminary Drafts (the database Safety BL-011 Reports: Building Activity Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD is the original); GC§34090 Required Required Ppr Requests&Permissions to Mag, Building & Yes: After SafetyBL-012 Receive Copies of Plans(to 2 years 2 years Mfr. OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 and from Architects) I Ppr BUILDING &SAFETY/G TY ennNAGER PCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT Building & Safety-G+tl- BL-013 Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After Department Preference; GC CoManage mm pity �1 Citations years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD §34090 Ppr Improve. Building& Code Enforcement/Abatement Department preference; Case is Sa ty-Git May- BL-014 Case Files(Includes appeals Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: Until g, Yes: After open until satisfactorily resolved Mime./ CI-002 and Code Enforcement years years Resolution Mfr, OD, S/I OC&OD (some cases are not resolved); Community Complaint Letters) Ppr CFC§104.3.4, GC§34090 Improve. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 294 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-1 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). CITY CLERK Agenda Packets: City Council, Redevelopment Agency, Successor Agency, Oversight Department preference; Board, Fire Protection District Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Includes final budget and final City Clerk CC-001 Board, Public Safety 2 years P P S/ I Commission,All OD, Ppr QC&OD audit reports/CAFR; GC Subcommittees of the City §34090 Council (Public Works Subcommittee, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 295 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-2 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention I Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC-d? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Agreements&Contracts-ALL (INFRASTRUCTURE, OR IF IMAGED,JPAs, MOUs, FRANCHISES) Agreement or Contract includes all contractual Department Preference;All obligations(e.g. Specifications infrastructure contracts and Successful Proposal/ should be permanent for Scope of Work) emergency preparedness; Yes: After Statute of Limitations is 4 Yes: Before Mag, Mfr, QC&OD years; 10 years for Errors& Examples of Infrastructure: p P City Clerk CC-002 Completion P P Completion OD, P r S I Omissions; land records are Architects, Buildings, bridges, Gempletien permanent by law; CCP§337 covenants, development, et. seq., GC§34090; environmental, Joint Powers, Contractor has retention MOUs, park improvements, requirements in 48 CFR property&property 4.703 restrictions, redevelopment, reservoirs, sewers, sidewalks, street&alley improvements, settlement, subdivisions, utilities,water, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 296 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-3 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Agreements&Contracts-ALL (NON-INFRASTRUCTURE, Professional Services Agreements -NOT IMAGED) Department Preference; Agreement or Contract Statute of Limitations is 4 includes all contractual years; 10 years for Errors& obligations(e.g. Specifications Omissions; land records are Completion + Yes: Before Mag, Mfr Yes: After City Clerk CC-003 and Successful Proposal/ Completion 10 years S/I permanent by law; CCP Scope of Work) 10 years Completion OD Ppr QC&OD §§337. 337.1(a), 337.15, 343; GC§34090, Contractor has Examples of Non- retention requirements in 48 Infrastructure: Consultants, CFR 4.703(a) Landscaping, Painting, Slurry Seals (Paving),Tree Trimming, Leases, Personnel, Professional Services, etc. City Clerk CC-004 Articles of Incorporation P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC OD, Ppr QC&OD §34090 Board &Commission/ Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-005 Committee Maddy Act Lists/ 2 years 2 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD GC§34090 Vacancy Notices Board &Commission Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-006 Applications(Successful and 2 years 2 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD GC§34090 Unsuccessful) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 297 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-4 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Securities(Performance Bonds, Letters of Credit, CD's, etc.)are normally Bonds(Performance Bonds, Release of Release of released after the Notice of City Clerk CC-007 Subdivision Bonds, Letters of Bond/Letter Bond/Letter Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Completion is filed. Bond/ Credit) of Credit of Credit OD Ppr QC&OD letter may be replaced with a Warranty Bond, which is usually released 1 year after the Notice of Completion date. GC§34090 City Council Subcommittees: All recommendations are Agendas, Minutes Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-008 (Composed solely of less than 2 Years 2 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD presented to the City Council; a quorum of the City Council) GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. City Council, Board& Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department preference; GC City Clerk CC-009 Commission Historical List of P P OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD §34090 Members Economic Interest Filings Statements filed electronically (FPPC 700 Series Forms- are required for 10 years; City Clerk CC-044 Statement of Economic 10 years 10 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After City maintains copies only; OD, Ppr QC& OD original statements are filed Interests): with FPPC; GC§81009(f)(g); ELECTRONICALLY FILED GC§84615 Economic Interest Filings (FPPC 700 Series Forms- Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City maintains original City Clerk CC-010 Statement of Economic 7 years 7 years P S/I QC statements; GC Interests): ALL FILED N OD, pr years §81009(d)(e)(f)&(g) PAPER FORMAT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 298 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-5 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC-d? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Economic Interest Filings City Clerk CC-011 (FPPC Form 602/635)- 2 years 5 years 7 years Mag, Mfr S/I Yes: After 2 CCR 18615(f), GC§34090 Lobbyist Authorization OD Ppr QC years Reporting City Clerk CC-012 FPPC Form 801 (Gift to 7 years 7 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Must post on website; FPPC Agency Report) OD Ppr QC 2years Opinion; GC§81009(e FPPC Form 802 (Event Ticket Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Should post on website for 4 City Clerk CC-013 /Pass Distributions Agency 7 years 7 years OD Ppr S/I QC 2years years; GC§81009(e) Report) City Clerk CC-014 FPPC Form 803(Behested 7 years 7 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§81009e Payment Report) OD Ppr QC 2 years City Clerk CC-015 FPPC Form 804(Agency P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After FPPC Regulation 18734(c); Report of New Positions) OD, Ppr QC 2 years GC§81009e City Clerk CC-016 FPPC Form 805(Agency P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After FPPC Regulation 18734(c); Report of Consultants) OD, Ppr QC 2 years GC§81009e FPPC Form 806(Agency Must post on website; 2 CCR City Clerk CC-017 Report of Public Official 7 years 7 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After 18702.5(b)(3); GC§34090; Appointments) OD Ppr QC years GC§81009(e) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 299 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-6 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS CONSOLIDATED City Clerk/ Assessment District Ballots, Elections CC-018 Protest Letters, &Envelopes- 2 years 2 years Ppr GC§§53753(e)(2), 53755 d Prop. 218 proceedings Campaign Filings(FPPC 400 For Electronic Filings, Data Series Forms& Form 501): that has been maintained for City Clerk/ SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES Mag, Mfr, Yes: After at least 10 years may then be Elections CC-019 (Elected Officials) 2 years P P OD, Ppr S QC years archived in a secure format; All,whether filed electronically — Paper must be retained for at or not least 2 years; GC §81009(b)&(g); GC§84615(i) Campaign Filings(FPPC 400 Candidates without Series Forms &Form 501): committees are not required UNSUCCESSFUL to file their statements, City Clerk/ CANDIDATES Mag, Mfr, Yes: After reports or copies online or Elections CC-020 Includes Unsuccessful 5 years 5 years OD, Ppr S QC 2 years electronically; Paper must be Candidates Without retained for at least 2 years; Committees that Don't File GC§81009(b)&(g);GC- Electronically §8461-5 Campaign Filings (FPPC 400 Series Forms, 501 Form): City Clerk/ UNSUCCESSFUL Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Statements filed electronically Elections CC-020.1 CANDIDATES, 10 years 10 years OD, Ppr S/I QC are required for 10 years; GC ELECTRONICALLY FILED- §81009(b)&(g); GC§84615 WITH or WITHOUT Committees RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 300 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-7 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC-d? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Campaign Filings(FPPC 400 City Clerk Series Forms): THOSE NOT Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Paper must be retained for at / Elections CC-021 REQUIRED TO FILE 4 years 4 years OD, Ppr S/ I QC least 2 years; GC ORIGINAL WITH CITY CLERK §81009(f)&(g) (copies) Campaign Filings(FPPC 400 City Clerk/ Series Forms): OTHER Paper must be retained for at Elections CC-022 COMMITTEES (PACS-not 7 Years 7 years Mag, Ppr least 2 years; GC candidate-controlled) §81009(c)&(g) Candidate File: Nomination CA law states term of office City Clerk/ Papers, Candidate Statement Term of Term of and 4 years after the Elections Forms, etc. -SUCCESSFUL CC-023 Office+4 Office+4 Mag, Ppr expiration of term for CANDIDATES years years Nomination Papers; EC §17100 Candidate File: Nomination Department Preference; CA Papers, Candidate Statement law states term of office and 4 City Clerk/ CC-024 Forms, etc. - Election +4 Election +4 Mag, Ppr years after the expiration of Elections UNSUCCESSFUL years years term for Nomination Papers; CANDIDATES EC§17100 Elections-GENERAL, WORKING or ADMINISTRATION Files (Correspondence, Precinct City Clerk/ Maps, County Election Elections CC-025 Services, Candidate 2 years 2 years Mag, Ppr GC§34090 Statements to be printed in the Sample Ballot, Polling Locations and Precinct Board Members, Notices, Postings, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 301 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-8 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC-d? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Elections-HISTORICAL City Clerk/ CC-026 (copies of resolutions,final 2 years P P OD, Mfr, S No Retained for Historical Value, Elections results; Certificate of Election) OD, Ppr GC§34090 Not accessible to the public: Final Final The 8 month retention applies City Clerk/ Elections-Petitions(Initiative, Examination Examination after election results, or final Elections CC-27.1 Recall or Referendum)- IF + 1 year after + 1 ear after Per examination if no election, INSUFFICIENT petition petition unless there is a legal or examination examination FPPC proceeding. EC §&17200(b)(3), 17400 Not accessible to the public; The 8 month retention applies Results+8 Results+8 City Clerk/ Elections-Petitions(Initiative, after election results,or final Elections CC-27.2 Recall or Referendum)- IF months months EP—r examination if no election, SUFFICIENT unless there is a legal or FPPC proceeding. EC 4417200(b)(3). 17400 Results 8 Resultso Not n^ ..��6ihln to the hlin months Final Final after nleGtmo results, r final City Clerk C l....+i..r,.. R.,fi+i...,s/Ir.i+i„fi.a. C...,w.ir..,H..., Cv"w,'n�,+'.. GC-027 r Ica m'n afro e n err nsuff'n n+ ir-rrr�rrr" rc-n--n'c End of Elections Section RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 302 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-9 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). City Clerk determines Historical Records, historical significance; Photographs, & Historical Yes: After records can address a variety City Clerk CC-028 Projects (e.g. Incorporation, P P Ppr Mag, Mfr, S/I Q OD, C of subjects and media. Some &OD media (e.g. audio and video City Seal,Awards of significant No historical interest, etc.) tape)may be limited because of the media's life expectancy; GC§34090 Minutes: City Council, Redevelopment Agency, City Clerk CC-029 Successor Agency, Oversight P P Mag, Mfr, S/I No GC§34090 Board, Fire Protection District OD, Ppr Board, Public Safety Commission Municipal Code Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-030 Administration, Distribution, 2 years 2 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD GC§34090 etc. Municipal Code History/ Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department preference City Clerk CC-031 P P S/I (retain one of each Supplements OD, Ppr QC'd &OD supplement); GC§34090.7 Oath of Office: City Council, Term of Term of Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC City Clerk CC-032 Boards&Commission Office+4 Office+4 S/I Members years years OD, Ppr QC'd &OD §34090 City Clerk CC-033 Ordinances P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 OD, Ppr QC'd &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 303 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-10 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Petitions(submitted to Council on any subject-Dog Parks, Parking,Traffic Calming, etc.) Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department preference; only City Clerk CC-034 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I QC'd &OD 1 year is required; GC , See Elections for Initiative, §50115 Recall or Referendum Petitions City Clerk CC-035 Public Records Requests/ 2 years 2 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 Request for Records OD, Ppr QC'd &OD Recorded Documents: ALL- Deeds, Easements, Liens& Releases, Rights of Way, Yes: After City Clerk CC-036 Notices of Completion, P P Yes (all) Mag, Mfr, S/I QC&OD Department preference; GC Recorded Agreements/ OD, Ppr §34090 et seq. Contracts, Certificate of Compliance, etc. Recordings-AUDIO of City Council, Redevelopment Department preference; State City Clerk CC-037 Agency, Successor Agency, 2 years 2 years Mag law only requires for 30 days; Oversight Board, Fire Q9 Protection District Board, GC§54953.5(b) Public Safety Commission Recordings-VIDEO of City Council, Redevelopment Department Preference; City Clerk CC-038 Agency, Successor Agency, Minimum 3 Minimum 3 Mag Video recording of meetings Oversight Board, Fire years years OD are only required for 90 days; Protection District Board, GC§§34090.7, 34090 Public Safety Commission City Clerk CC-039 Records Destruction P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC Authorization Forms,Transfers OD, Ppr QC'd &OD §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 304 Ver. 20 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY CLERK Page CC-11 (Elections) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Records Retention Schedules/ Yes: After City Clerk CC-040 Amendments to Records 10 years P P Mag, Mfr,P S/ I QC&OD GC§34090 et. seq. Retention Schedules OD, pr NO Redistricting Web Page/ District Boundary Web Page Mag, Mfr, Yes: After EC 21160 i GC City Clerk CC-046 (Map, Redistricting Process, 10 years 10 years S/ I 090 fig)' Agendas, Calendars, Notice, Ppr QC&OD §34090 etc.) Resolutions: City Council, Redevelopment Agency, Successor Agency, Oversight Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-041 Board, Fire Protection District P P OD, Ppr NO S/I QC&OD GC§34090 Board, Public Safety Commission Secretary of State Statement Mag, Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CC-045 of Facts/Registry of Public 2 years 2 years _Ppr SS�II QC&OD GC§34090 Agencies When No When No Maq,� Yes: After Preliminary drafts used to City Clerk CC-042 Speaker Cards Longer Longer S/I OD Ppr QC&OD produce minutes; GC§34090 Required Required RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 305 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY MANAGER Page CM-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I i I S=ScanQC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). CITY MANAGER City Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Manager CM-014 All Hands Meeting Agendas 2 years 2 years _OD Ppr S f lI QC&OD GC§34090 City CM-001 Annual Reports/Strategic Plans P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Department Preference; GC Manager OD, Ppr QC'd &OD §34090 City CM-015 Art in Public Places(City Projects, 5 years P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC Manager not Developer Projects) OD, Ppr QC&OD §34090 Brown Act challenges must be City Art In Public Places Committee Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After filed within 30 or 90 days of Manager CM-016 AGENDAS,AGENDA PACKETS years years _OD Ppr S I QC&OD action; GC§§34090, 54960.1(c)(1) City Art In Public Places Committee Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Manager CM-017 MINUTES&BYLAWS P WW�hen OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090 No City Mag,� Yes: After Manager CM-002 Cable TV Complaints 2 years _Ppr S I QC&OD GC§34090 City Minimum 2 Mag,� Yes: After Department Preference; GC Manager CM-003 City Council Correspondence years _Ppr S I QC&OD §34090 When No City Council/Commission Contact Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Preliminary documents; GC Manager CM-004 Forms Longer Longer _Ppr SS f 1I QC&OD §34090 et seq. Required Required City Grand Jury Reports and Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference (the Manager CM-005 Responses(Regarding City 5 years 5 years OD Ppr SS f 1I QC&OD Grand Jury keeps their reports 5 Operations) years); GC§34090 City CM-006 Proclamations/Commendations 2 years 2 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 Manager OD, Ppr QC'd &OD Projects, Programs, Subject& City Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Manager CM-007 Issues (Issues and/or projects will years years _Ppr SS f lI QC&OD §34090 vary over time) City CM-008 Public Comment Cards 2 years 2 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 Manager OD, Ppr QC'd &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 306 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY MANAGER Page CM-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I i I S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). City Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Manager CM-009 RCTV Message Request Forms 2 years 2 years _Ppr S I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. City Speech Notes/PowerPoint Mag,� Yes: After Manager CM-010 Presentations 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag,� Yes: After Invoices are maintained by Finance CM-011 Travel/Conferences Longer Longer OD Ppr S I QC&OD Finance; GC§34090.7 Required Required Videos (Public activity, etc. Not When No When No Content does not relate in a City City Council or Advisory Body Mag, Mfr, Yes: After substantive way to the conduct Manager CM-012 Videos, nor regular, ongoing Longer Longer _Ppr S I QC&OD of the public's business; GC operations of the City) Required Required §34090 et seq. City CM-013 Weekly Reports(News&Notes) 2 years 2 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 Mana er OD Ppr QC'd &OD CITY MANAGER 1 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT Mangew 61--081 Gita#ier►s rnmnmuii-c- Mmmurt-c Mag,� I m�� s s IM d�--E-I PS ! .,.J.. Cnfn r..nrv.i.n+ / Ahn+..w,..n+ flepaFtmen+pFefe ; Gaise ManaqeF— Case Film. (includes appeals and Minimum 2 Manir.um 2 Yes: Until Mag �Af� Vn After: n.+.+r. .i.,+il � 'iSf.,.t0Fil...esol...,.J �,4_ee,� �vnrnrrrvrrrc �rnrrtrrtarrrc �-cv--vrrtrr 'vTc.9, 'vTT � I TcS�crcf.'r' 6'emmunity- Code Enforcement Gemnl„in+ yeaFS years ResoiutieR ! ID Dnr (..eme cases are not r olyed)� Lette­* RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 307 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). COMMUNITY SERVICES Copies- Copies- Risk Accident/Incident Reports When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Management CS-001 (Members of the Public) Longer Longer pr S/I QC&OD GC§34090.7 Required Required Activity/Special Programs/ Special Event Files& Reports/ ABC Permits,where required Mag, Community CS-002 Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC Services After School, Children's Programs, Years years Ppr QC&OD §34090 Cultural Arts, Sports, Seniors, Filming,Theatre Programs etc. Community CS-003 Armored Car Manifests 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After GC§34090 Services Ppr QC&OD Art in Public Places/Artists in Mag, Community CS-004 Residence-Successful P P Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC Services P QC&OD §34090 Placements Ppr Art in Public Places/Artists in Mag, Community CS-005 Residence-Unsuccessful Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After Department preference; GC Services Proposals years years Ppr — QC&OD §34090 Yes: After Department preference; Artist Contracts Yes: Mag, QC&OD Community Completion + Statute of Limitations: CS-006 Includes Insurance Certificates and Completion 5 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I Services 5 years Contracts&Spec's=4 years; Administration Records Completion Ppr GeFnn4etie CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 f� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 308 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Community Mag' Yes: After 2 years, unless it is a Services CS-007 Attendance Tracking 2 years 2 years Mfrr,,pOD, S/ I QC&OD preliminary draft; GC§34090 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP- where Community Services is the Lead): Administration File/NOT Department preference; Some Scanned 10 years or Completion + grant funding agencies require After 10 years or audits; Statute of Limitations Project Administration, Certified Funding After Funding for Errors&Omissions is 10 CS-008 Community Payrolls, Community Outreach/ Upon Agency Agency Yes: Until Mag'p Yes: After years; Statute of Limitations: Mfr, OD, S/I Services Notifications, Project Schedules, Completion Audit, if Audit, if Completed P r QC&OD Contracts&Spec's=4 years, Progress meetings, Punch Lists, required, required, Wrongful Death=comp. +5 Real Estate Appraisals, RFIs& whichever is whichever is years, Developers=comp. + 10 Responses,Temporary longer longer years; CCP§337 et. seq., GC Easements, Construction §34090 Manager's Logs, Daily Inspections, Daily Logs, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 309 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-3 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Capital Improvement Projects (CIP- where Community Services is the Lead): Permanent File/Scanned Records Specifications/RFP&Addenda, Yes: After Agreement/Contract(copy), Mag' QC&OD Department preference; CS-009 P P Community Successful Proposal, Change Upon Yes: Until p retained for disaster Mfr, OD, S/I Services Orders, Geotechnical Studies& Completion Completed Ppr + 10 preparedness purposes; GC Reports, Operations&Maintenance yes §34090 Manuals(O&M Manuals,)Materials Testing Reports, Grading Permits, Hazardous Materials Plans, Notice of Completion, Photos, Soil Reports, Studies, Submittals, Surveys, etc. Yes: After Department preference; Class Instructors Contracts Yes: Mag, QC&OD Community Completion + Statute of Limitations: CS-010 Includes Insurance Certificates and Completion 5 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I UPer� Services 5 years Contracts&Spec's=4 years; Administration Records Completion Ppr Gemp4etfe CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 R Yes: After Department preference; QC&OD Community Completion + Yes: Mag, Statute of Limitations: Services CS-011 Client/Provider Agreements Completion 5 years 5 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I UPW Contracts&Spec's=4 years; Completion Ppr 10e CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 e RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 310 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-4 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Lead Dept. & Mag' Yes: After City preference(not all detail is Finance CS-015 Credit Card Receipts 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD sent to Finance); GC§34090 Community Customer Relations/Member Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: After Data fields are inter-related; CS-016 Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mfr. OD, S/I Services Database QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. years ears Ppr Deposits/Cash Receipts Detail/ Mag, Lead Dept. & Yes: After City preference(not all detail is CS-017 Backup/Accounts Receivable 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I Finance QC&OD sent to Finance); GC§34090 Detail/Refund Detail Ppr Community Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After Department Preference; GC Services CS-018 Donations years years Mfrr,,pOD, S/I QC&OD §34090 When No When No Mag, Content does not relate in a Community Yes: After substantive way to the conduct Services CS-019 Evaluations/Surveys(of programs) Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD of the public's business; GC Required Required Ppr §34090 Event Service Agreements/ESS I Yes: After Contracts/Special Event Contacts Yes: Mag, QC&OD Department preference; Com Community /Professional Service Agreements Completion + Statute of Limitations: Services CS-020 (PSAs) pletion 5 years 5 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I Comletion P Contracts&Spec's=4 years; Includes Insurance Certificates and ppr Celetie CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 Administration Records Facility Use Rental Contracts/Field Community Use Contracts/Facility Use Yes: Mag, Yes: After Services CS-021 Requests (includes insurance 2 Years 2 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 certificates and/or ABC Permit) Event Ppr Community Mag' Yes: After Services CS-022 Fundraising Events 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I OC&OD GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 311 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-5 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Lead Dept. & Mag' Yes: After City preference(not all detail is Finance CS-023 Gift Shop Sale Receipts 2 years 2 years Mfr,Ppr S/ I QC&OD sent to Finance); GC§34090 House Reports/Program Files/ Community Event Files/Sponsored Vouchers/ Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Services CS-024 Coupons (Theatre) years years pr S/I QC&OD §34090 Includes Contract Billing Community Lewis Family Playhouse Inactive + 5 Inactive + 5 Mag, Yes: After Department preference(meets Services CS-025 Memberships years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD auditing standards); GC Ppr §34090 Original Staff Reports are filed Community Park and Recreation Commission Mag, Yes: After in the project file; Brown Act Services CS-026 P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD challenges must be filed within AGENDA PACKETS&AGENDAS Ppr 2 years 30 or 90 days of action; GC §§34090, 54960.1(c)(1) Park and Recreation Commission Community Tape- City preference; State law only Services CS-027 AUDIO RECORDINGS of Meetings 2 years 2 years (Mag) requires for 30 days; GC /Audio Tapes §54953.5(b) Park and Recreation Commission Community Mag, Yes: After Services CS-028 MINUTES RESOLUTIONS& P P Yes Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 BYLAWS Ppr {ale Yes: After Department preference; Performance Contracts Yes: Mag, QC&OD Community Completion + Statute of Limitations: CS-029 Includes Insurance Certificates and Completion 5 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I tper- Services 5 years Contracts&Spec's=4 years; Administration Records Completion Ppr Gen}plet+e CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 n RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 312 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-6 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Community CS-030 Photo Waivers 2 years 2 years Before Mfr, OD, S/ I Yes: After GC§34090 Services Event Ppr QC&OD Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Community CS-031 Recreation Database (Active Net) Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After Department Preference; data is Services ears QC&OD interrelated; GC§34090 years Registration/Applications/ Yes: Liability Forms/Release of Liability Mag, Community During Yes: After Services CS-032 Forms/Permissions: Camps, Field 2 years 2 years Class or Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 Trips,Authorization to give Ppr Medicine, etc. Program Community Yes: Mag, Yes: After Services CS-033 Safety Inspections 2 years 2 years Before Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 Event Yes: After .Community When No When No Mag, Preliminary drafts not retained CS-034 Schedules/Hours Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I in the ordinary course of Services Required Required Ppr OC&OD business; GC§34090 Mag, Department Preference(meets Community CS-035 Scholarships 5 years 5 years Mfr. OD, S/I Yes: After auditing standards); GC Services Ppr QC&OD §34090 Senior Advisory Committee-All Mag, Community Yes: After Services CS-037 Records (Members are not 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 Appointed by the City Council) Ppr Community Sign-in/Sign-Out Sheets for Mag' Yes: After Services CS-039 classes and programs 2 years 2 years Mfr,pOD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 r I Sports Advisory Committee-All Mag, Community Yes: After Services CS-040 Records (Member are not 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 Appointed by the City Council) Ppr RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 313 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-7 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). When No When No Mag, Preliminary drafts not retained Community Sports Organizations/Non-Profit Yes: After . CS-041 Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I in the ordinary course of Services Organizations (Little League, etc.) Required Required Ppr QC&OD business; GC§34090 Preliminary drafts/Transitory records-NOT made or When No When No Mag, retained for the purpose of Community CS-042 Sports Score Sheets, Schedules Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After preserving the informational Services Required Required Ppr QC&OD content for future reference, GC§34090; 64 Ops. Cal.Atty. Gen. 317(1981)) Community Theatre Member Files/Patron Files Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: Mag, Yes: After Department Preference; GC CS-043 Before Mfr, OD, S/I Services (Gym, etc.) years years Event Ppr QC&OD §34090 When No When No Mag, Preliminary drafts not retained Community CS-044 Ticket Stubs Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After in the ordinary course of Services Required Required Ppr QC&OD business; GC§34090 Consistent with employee personnel files(Courts treat volunteers as employees); Volunteer/Unpaid Intern EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Applications&Agreements- r,O Yes: After requires 3 years for promotion, Lead Dept. CS-045 Unsuccessful or Pending 3 years 3 years Mffr, OD, S/I QC&OD demotion, transfer, selection, Applicants Ppr or discharge; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), 8 CCR §3204(d)(1)et seq., GC §§12960, 34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 314 Ver. 17.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: COMMUNITY SERVICES Page CS-8 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Courts treat volunteers as employees; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA Volunteer/Unpaid Intern (Age)requires 3 years for Applications&Agreements Inactive/ Inactive/ Mag, Yes: After promotion, demotion,transfer, Lead Dept. CS-046 (includes emergency contact Separation + Separation + Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD selection, or discharge; State information) -Successful 3 years 3 years Ppr 1 year Law requires 2-3 years; 29 Applicants CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), 8 CCR§3204(d)(1)et seq., GC §§12960, 34090; 29 USC 1113 Community Mag' Yes: After Services CS-047 Waivers of Liability 2 years 2 years Mfrr,,pOD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 315 Ver. 9.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY Page DOIT-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I i I S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION &TECHNOLOGY Depart. of Used for Disaster Recovery Innovation Backups/Computer Backups When No When No Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Purposes Only; Considered a & DOIT-001 (ALL Disaster Recovery Computer Longer Longer Yes OD P r SS�II QC&OD copy and can be destroyed Technology Backups) Required Required �� when no longer required; GC §34090 et seq. Depart. of Innovation Network Configuration Maps& Mag, Mfr, Yes: After & DOIT-003 Plans 2 years 2 years Yes OD, Pp r S/I QC&OD GC§34090 et seq. Technology Depart. of Innovation Mag, Mfr, Yes: After & DOIT-003.5 Routine Video Monitoring 1 year 1 year Yes OD, Pp Sfl QC&OD GC�34090.6(a) Technology UNALTERABLE MEDIA/ For legal compliance for IMMUTABLE MEDIA (CLOUD R Trustworthy Electronic Records Depart. of IMMUTABLE BACKUP)/WORM Follows (when the electronic record / Innovation Retention of Maq, Mfr, Yes: After serves as the official record); & DOIT-004 DVD /CD-r/Blue Ray-R or other P Official OD, Ppr Sfl QC&OD must be stored in a"safe and Technology UNALTERABLE MEDIA that does Electronic separate location"; GC 34090, not permit additions, deletions, or Record 12168.7, EVC 1550, 2 CCR changes 22620 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 316 Ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Page ED-1 (FORMER REDEVELOPMENT / SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING, RDA), SUCCESSOR AGE Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I J I S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/FORMER REDEVELOPMENT/SUCCESSOR AGENCY Economic Develop./ Economic Development Projects, Former Programs, Subject& Issues Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag,� Yes: After Department Preference; GC Redevelop ED-001 S/ ment-IR-D,4/ (Issues and/or projects will vary years years OD Ppr QC&OD §34090 Successor overtime) Agency Economic Develop./ Former Mag,� Yes: After Department Preference; GC Redevelop ED-002 Mobile Home Accords P P S/ ment4ZBA/ _OD Ppr QC&OD §34090 Successor Agency Economic Develop./ Mag, Mfr, Yes: Af ter Department preference, meets Former / ED-003 Real Estate Appraisals 5 years 5 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD municipal auditing standards; Successor p GC§34090 Agency Recorded Documents: ALL- Copies- Copies- Deeds, Easements, Liens& Yes: After When No When No Mag, Mfr, Finals are maintained by City City Clerk ED-004 Releases, Rights of Way, Notices Longer Longer Yes(all) OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD Clerk; GC§34090 et seq. of Completion, Recorded Required Required No Agreements/Contracts, etc. Economic Develop./ Redevelopment Long Range Completion Completion Mag,r, Yes: After Department preference; GC Former / ED-005 Property Management Plans, S/ Successor Oversight Plans + 10 years + 10 years Ppr QC&OD §34090 Agency RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 317 Ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Page ED-2 (FORMER REDEVELOPMENT / SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING, RDA), SUCCESSOR AGE Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I J I S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Economic Develop./ Former / ED-006 Redevelopment Plans P P Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After Department Preference for _OD Ppr QC&OD Historical Purposes; GC§34090 Successor Agency Redevelopment Projects& Project Areas Planning, Building and Economic Engineering retains final Develop./ (Ensure Planning has all documents of construction Completion Completion Mag, Yes: After projects (transfer any CIP Former / ED-007 Environmental Documents, S/ + 10 years + 10 years _Ppr QC&OD project files to Engineering); Successor Engineering has all CIP Projects, Agency and City Clerk has all Real Covers various Statute of Property records for Permanent Limitations; CCP§337 et seq.; retention) GC§34090 Economic Develop./ Department preference, meets Completion Completion Mag, Yes: After Former / ED-008 Relocations + 5 years + 5 years �Ppr S�I QC&OD municipal auditing standards; Successor CCP§337 et seq.; GC§34090 Aciencv ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HOUSING Economic Foreclosure Notices/Notices of Disposition + Disposition + Mag,� Yes: After City Attorney preference; GC Develop./ ED-009 S/ Housing Defaults (NOD) 5 years 5 years Ppr QC&OD §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 318 Ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Page ED-3 (FORMER REDEVELOPMENT / SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING, RDA), SUCCESSOR AGE Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I J I S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). 5 years after HUD requires 5 years after the Housing Programs: Affordable After the the project completion; documents Affordability imposing recapture/resale Housing Projects, Rehabilitation, Period Affordability restrictions are 5 years after the CDBG-funded Housing Projects, Period Terminates,Economic etc. Terminates, Yes: After affordability period terminates; Develop. ED-010 5 years or the or the S/Mag, Mfr, QC&OD Uniform Admin. Requirements / Housing WITH a Recapture/Resale Written Written OD, Ppr When for Grants to Local Governments Restriction Agreement Agreement ina6tove is 3 years from expenditure Terminates, Terminates, report; 2 CFR 200.334; 24 CFR Deeds are sent to City Clerk Whichever is Whichever is 92.508(a)&(c)&570.502(a)(16), Longer Longer 982.158, 884.214; 29 CFR 97.42, GC§34090 Housing Programs: Affordable HUD requires 5 years after the Housing Projects, Rehabilitation, agreement terminates; CDBG-funded Housing Projects, Consistent with Consolidated etc. Loan Pay-off Loan Pay-off Plan Requirements; Required for Economic S/Develop./ ED-011 OR OR Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 3-4 years from expenditure or WITHOUT a Recapture/Resale Forgiveness Forgiveness OD, Ppr QC&OD performance report; 2 CFR Housing Restriction + 5 years + 5 years 200.334; 24 CFR 92.508(a)&(c) &570.502(a)(16), 982.158, Deeds and Insurance are sent to 884.214; 29 CFR 97.42, GC City Clerk §34090 Loan Applications/Potential Economic Buyers Denied, Cancelled or Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Develop./ ED-012 Withdrawn (First Time Home 2 years 2 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD GC§34090 Housing Buyers, Life/Safety, Rehabilitation, HOME, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 319 Ver. 8.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Page ED-4 (FORMER REDEVELOPMENT / SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING, RDA), SUCCESSOR AGE Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & I J I S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Preliminary Application Form (required for a housing Various benchmarks are placed Economic development project that includes Mag, Mfr, Yes: After using the number of residential Develop./ ED-013 residential units;form is provided 5 years 5 years ODp P r SS�II QC&OD dwelling units on the project site Housing by California Department of within the last five years; GC Housing &Community §§34090, 66300. Development RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 320 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-1 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SEE CITY-WIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES/CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Improvement Projects (CIP): Maintenance Projects- Not Involving Professional 5 years or Completion + Department preference; Some After 5 years or grant funding agencies require Design Professional Services Engineering Funding After Funding audits; Statute of Limitations for (All Records) Mag, Yes: Services/ Upon Agency Agency Yes: Until Errors&Omissions is not ENG-001 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Capital Examples of Maintenance Completion Audit, if Audit, if Completed Ppr &OD applicable; Statute of Projects required, required, Limitations: Contracts& Projects: Painting, Pavement whichever is whichever is Spec's=4 years; CCP§337 et. Overlays, Repairs, Ramps, Re- longer longer seq., GC§34090 Roof, Sidewalk Repairs, Slurry Seals, etc. Capital Improvement Projects (CIP): Administration File/NOT Scanned 10 years or Completion + Department preference; Some After 10 years or grant funding agencies require Engineering Project Administration, Certified Funding After Funding audits; Statute of Limitations for Services Payrolls, Community Outreach/ Upon Agency Agency Yes: Until Mag, Yes: Errors&Omissions is 10 years; / Capital ENG-002 Notifications, Project Schedules Completion Audit, if Audit, if Completed , Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Statute of Limitations: Contracts Projects Progress meetings, Punch Lists, required, required, Ppr &OD &Spec's=4 years,Wrongful Real Estate Appraisals, RFIs& Death=comp. +5 years, Responses, Temporary whichever is whichever is Developers=comp. + 10 years; Easements, Construction longer longer CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 Manager's Logs, Daily Inspections, Daily Logs, Photos, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 321 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-2 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Capital Improvement Projects (CIP): Permanent File/Scanned Records Specifications&Addenda, Yes: Agreement/Contract(copy), Engineering After QC Department preference; Successful Proposal, Change Mag, Services/ Upon Yes: Until &OD retained for disaster Capital ENG-003 Orders, Geotechnical Studies& Completion P P Completed Mfr, OD, S/I Complet. preparedness purposes; GC Projects Reports, Operations& Ppr + 10 §34090 Maintenance Manuals(O&M Manuals,)Materials Testing $ Reports, Grading Permits, Hazardous Materials Plans, Notice of Completion, Soil Reports, Studies, Submittals, Surveys, etc. Engineering Data Fields/Records are Services/ Construction Inspection Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: interrelated; Covers Statute of ENG-004 Minimum 10 Minimum 10 Yes Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC Limitations for Errors& Capital Databases years years Ppr &OD Omissions; GC§34090, CCP§ Projects 337.1 and 337.15 Engineering Mag, Yes, Services/ ENG-005 Design &Construction Standards- P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC Capital Authored by the City Ppr &OD §34090 Projects RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 322 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-3 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Drafts should be destroyed; Engineering Drawings, Maps, Plans and Yes: Some maps are also retained ENG-006 P P Yes(all) Mf O Services/ Record Drawings, Large-Format r, OD, S After QC by Planning; Selected maps are p Capital Drawings, Capital Improvement P r &OD retained in Public Works for Projects Project"As-Built", Base Maps No administrative purposes; GC §34090, 34090.7 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Fo CeryoGe�. / � Department preferenee T CnI T 2_ye•arc 2 yeaFc � `C�l n�� EnViF0RrneR al PFE)grafn$ Rpr &_OQ Cn Service _� C G 99 r`..nstFu ct'on Diversion /flor�.�.c'+ C� 'I �fteF Q . Department preference; GC EnViFenment l�l`7-eCd rc; 10 � 10 emir-vir d-Yt ttttCr-C.Y7 �` §34090 al_Drvgium� PRF &-OD Programs Cn Department preference; Servicec / ' FOG Mag Yes- Enviroenrc E_ G 009 r`....+rel /Pretreatment nnn 3 deers 3_ye-aFs S`� Semi Appeal Deport.- �al PFOgFams Dn Pr r e required for 3. • 40 GFR Enginee i Household Hazardous Waste pp�� C ep deer. / T� � 4A rrD d4443 A• 77 r`r`D �r ENG 010 Recycling/Disposal/Dis al /oar+•, n+ 3 yeaF& 3 eaFs Mfr- 9l� S l n�o En.drenmen+ 66262.40 e+s • GG§340al on ms Legs P13F &OD Cngineerin Required for p of C o� m�p�m� m cer„•e � / ary �� �� c�n/Dr�Q nrrler�nn� �� En1,.G 01 5 yeaF& 5-yeaF& Mfr, OD, S/l A€teFQC year c' ,ent �Os3 ; el Drp,.r.am �r-OB 122 410)(2); GC§3Anon RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 323 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-4 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department nrnferenee; SSMP. Sewer System ManageMeR+Plans are required to be updated Co Yes: every 6 years; SSOs are SewmeeT �d� �� — red fnr a FR oim��m of C CAI�� Spills(l..n rFl n...Drn..00+�.... Dlnn � `�� Af��� al Drn � �e Overflow Response Plan SWRGB General Order 2 nZ• Q 2022 0103 DWQ; GG g Department nreferenee; CD Sei'd Waste Reduction 1383.. olinnGe is required for Dnn..nlino /AB 939 Complianoe / 5 years; Low.(`Form Fuel Service CAliNG 012 Tonnage Deports /CD 1383 10 dearsyears ' + After Standard . C n..'rn n+ �T 1e received for 1(1 years, n!! �"'ronme" Comnliannn (Organic Waste o�. al Drngrarns- r' �B eligible for an extension; 4 4 GG§Zenon et son Maw Yes: nnnnr+mnn+nrnfnrnnnn• �r Service CAli�w 013 Sei'd Waste Tonnage /AB�Z� 10.leers 10.leers � �+ After � marts ��9"��'�`T ��9"��'�" �� RpF �r-99 � �,,,, Required for n of C FingineeFing �T ENG 014 Corm. ater Illini+nisehnrnns 5 years 5 yeaFSMfr, D, com+ ftE I ' 40 marts &01)2 f'CD P§1 Z') rl1 122 41 177 AA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 324 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-5 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). C DepartmeR+Drafe FeRoe• Cpn.isps / C+prm...n+ar�Apni+arina /AIDnCC T T"`J vv're�r CAlc-NG 016 s G„ears 844 n�G 3. • A0 GCD §§177 7 Cp .,+ �-y"-car" ' rrc � &OD A 77 A 1 77 n n• I"`GP§337�a+ al Drograms ' ' t Dons iFed for n minimum of 5 Enginee vcry ree Cn r nt ENG-016 C+ + r: Business I ns peGt'o s 5 years s MfF, GD, 844 nmr+cr QG 40 , al Programs Dnr &OD GCD §§127 7A 177 A 172 AA GG§34 Engineering Department preference; SeFVmGer Smarr-N DES ;— Yes:C AILTv'v-vTr Reports �ye'a�S rittY-CL-� d-/-F /�F�,,./'��+ marts Repo ts- Afte F•'QG , al Programs A 77 Arc 4 1,1 2 Department Drefnrenee• �� Expiration + C Expee iation i Ves• Until r Gnl�o Sterrn aterr NIDDES Permits- � r �"r S44 after QG 3 years; nn GFR§§122 �.v„o;,me^t years �-years ExpirationPIN — �B .21 al Dr see[-. Department prefnren ee• plans y M-g, Yes: must be updated eveFy 6 '� ENG 9d`6rTvaicr—�v 5 years "Y"` "' �D' �Gaudits a .e every 2 EpVOrepnep+ � a.'mm na'L. naJ\ Dlap Rpf p �� , , al Dreera Fns vC-VV 40 GFR f:§122 21 122 A4 um�vgrurrru , FingineeFing Water Q al'+..Management Plans Cen.wses / Yes: nenar+rpen+preference; /'`/'` Fi;y ro ,me t n &Ge ,,.,�lop,'�o t) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 325 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-6 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ENGINEERING SERVICES/GENERAL ENGINEERING Engineering Yes: Services/ Mag' After QC Department Preference; GC General ENG-021 Aerial Maps(Analog/Historical) P P MfrP OD, S/I &OD §34090 Engineering p Ne Engineering Services/ ENG-022 Benchmarks P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC General Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering Engineering Correspondence- Regulatory Department preference; Some Services/ Agencies Not Related to a CIP Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: While Mag, Yes: correspondence from ENG-023 Active Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Regulatory Agencies need to be General (State& Federal Agencies, EPA, years years Issues Ppr &OD retained for long periods of time; Engineering Health Department, etc.) GC§34090 Encroachment Permits/ Engineering Excavation Permits: Temporary Final/ Final/ Mag, Yes: Services/ (Street Permits,Temporary Yes: Until ENG-024 Completion + Completion + Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC GC§34090 General Construction, Sidewalk Repairs, 2 years 2 years Completion Ppr &OD Engineering Traffic Control, Utility Cuts etc.) Includes Insurance Certificates Engineering Encroachments- Permanent Mag, Yes: Services/ ENG-025 (Permanent structures in the City's P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC General Right of Way) Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering Engineering Data Fields/Records are Services/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: interrelated; Some ENG-026 Engineering Permits Database Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC General Permanent Permanent P r &OD Encroachment Permits are Engineering Permanent; GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 326 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-7 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Engineering Engineering Studies/Surveys- Mag, Yes: Services/ ENG-027 Preliminary Studies/Project P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC General Assessments Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering Engineering Geotechnical and Soil Reports; Mag, Yes: Services/ Department Preference; GC ENG-028 Hydrology Reports(Authored on P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC General behalf of the City) Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering Engineering Services/ Grading Plans, Grading Plans& Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC ENG-029 P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC General Grading Certificates Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering Engineering Master Plans: Bikeway, Park, Services/ Pavement Sewer Traffic Mag, Yes: Department preference; Drafts , , , ENG-031 P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC should be destroyed; GC General Transportation,Water Master Plan, Ppr &OD §34090 Engineering etc. Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: City Clerk ENG-032 Public Works Subcommittee When No When NoLonger Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§34090.7 Required Required Ppr &OD Recorded Documents: ALL- Deeds, Easements, Liens& Releases, Rights of Way, Notices Copies- Yes: of Completion, Recorded When No After QC Mag, Even if documents are e- City Clerk ENG-033 Agreements/Contracts, Certificate Longer P P Yes (all) Mfr, OD, S/I &OD recorded, send all finals to the of Compliance, etc. Required Ppr No City Clerk; GC§34090 et seq. Send all originals to City Clerk, even if they are e-recorded. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 327 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-8 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ENGINEERING SERVICES/LAND DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION Mag, Yes: Building ENG-034 Plan Checks for Building Permits 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC GC§34090 et seq. Ppr &OD Private Land Development Projects/Job Files: Administration File Construction Inspections, Statute of Limitations for Errors Engineering Correspondence, Photos, Private &Omissions is 10 years; Services/ Lab Verifications, Testing Lab Upon Completion + Yes: Until Mag, Yes: Statute of Limitations: Contracts Land Dev. & ENG-035 Final Reports, etc. Completion 10 ears Completed 10 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC &Spec's=4 years,Wrongful Transportatio y Ppr &OD Death=comp. +5 years, n Examples of Development Developers=comp. + 10 years; Projects: CUPs, Lot Line CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 Adjustments, Parcel Maps, Precise Alignment, Specific Plans, Subdivisions, Tract Maps, Tracts,. TPMs, TSMs RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 328 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-9 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Private Land Development Projects/Job Files: Permanent Files Drainage, Driveway, Grading Plans, Rights of Way, Soil Engineering Reports, Stormwater, etc. Department preference; Services/ ,Mag Yes: Upon Yes: Until retained for disaster Land Dev. & ENG-036 Dedications, Easements, P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Transportatio Abandonments (City Clerk is OFR) Completion Completed Ppr &OD preparedness purposes; GC §34090 n Examples of Development Projects: CUPs, Lot Line Adjustments, Parcel Maps, Precise Alignment, Specific Plans, Subdivisions, Tract Maps, Tracts,. TPMs, TSMs Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: Police ENG-037 Traffic Collision Reports When No When No Mfr, OD, S/I After QC copies; GC§34090.7 Longer Longer Ppr &OD Required Required Engineering Services/ ,Mag Yes: Traffic Congestion Management Department preference; GC Land Dev. & ENG-038 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Transportatio Plans/Transportation Plans Ppr &OD §34090 n RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 329 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-10 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Engineering Services/ Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Land Dev. & ENG-039 Traffic Counts 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 Transportatio Ppr &OD n Engineering Services/ Mag, Yes: Land Dev. & ENG-040 Traffic Investigation Reports 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§34090 Transportatio Ppr &OD n Engineering Services/ Mag, Yes: Land Dev. & ENG-041 Self-Haul Permits 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC GC§34090 Transportatio Ppr &OD n Engineering Department preference Services/ Mag, Yes: (required every 5 years, but can Land Dev. & ENG-042 Traffic Speed Surveys 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC be extended to 7 or 10 years); Transportatio Ppr &OD GC§34090 n Engineering Services/ Transportation Studies/Traffic Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Land Dev. & ENG-043 Studies/ Warrants: Signals, Stop P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 Transportatio Signs, Crossing Guards, etc. Ppr &OD n ENGINEERING SER ICES /RCMI I _RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ITIES 9 Mag- Yes- Depart ent Preference; GC Servo o'Ges i RCMU 001 Applications for e,,ryi Z years 2 years "^�^� 844 After QC RCM U Rpr &98 §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 330 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-11 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Mag, Yes— Lead Dept -0022 AQMD Permits /r_eneratOFS .,+,.\ 5 years 5 years 844 After QG 40 CPR 70.6; P-RF &-9D €ng i neeriF�g MawYes—, SeFvmees4- RGMU 003 Affnered Car Man'fests 2 years 2 years S4 4 After QQ GG§34090 RPF &-QD Bu lk JL Dn..PowerI .... Sheets / Engineering p�-.���� ��� D��rnhne.inn /Suppliers r �1'I�l e. � Pnnnr+m.,n+Dr.�fn rnnnn• (_`!` v�T TcGMLJ 0G'•F s 10 years Mir-C77T 8*4 After QG /C..alua+inn.. Cin .,I Data §34090 .te U Reports r Studies) � &OD Y"��`�� NOT C..a.,n.,.J /Cln..+rioi+.. Fiber o Department nreferennn• Semn Dre ect Administration, Certified Funding After Funding F r n.,.. c 'Engi Payrolls, U9r- Aeney Aency v� po�^MU �t After Netfficat'ons, Project Schedules, Completion A f Q RC{U FIN � — „ram' \A/r.,n..fiUl Deal Estate Appraisals, DCIs A ' Responses, Temporary lenge TVi-tgCY rrD f.337..+ s ('r§34 non Easements, Genstructmw�- Manager's Logs, Daily Inspee+iens Daily Legs,—ete. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 331 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-12 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Fiber er Street Lights Only I epeeifioati ns /DCD 4 n.J.J..nd AgFeernent C.,,.ir „rir,,, c,�.....,r.r.f„I Proposal Changep�_�� T„�-�cQ , '�Pf yp* 1��$CC §34998 Maontenanoe Manuals (O&M Reports, GFading Permits—, Hazardous Materials RaRs, Netoee of Completion, Photes, So�k RepeFts�,+udies, S ars- c Engineerimn� indefonote— I�efonote— Maw Yes--- Ye RGMU (CIS) Database years years Per 9B GG§34059 n.,r,.,r+r..,,r,+of Cr..,r.-...(nnC) 4_ Cngineerir... Maw- Yes: � p���I� ��p Corinrnl C.�nrn..Don, Irf+n r�i n„r...r+mnn+Drnfn rn.�nn; (_(` Se�T f'IVIVtt:: 998 P R Mfrs OD, STY ^fi-'cfteF QG Depa � o^n,," Rpr o ^n s`iTv"v Engineerhig- Department of Energy(DOE)& Mag—, Yes: DepaFtment PFefeFenee; GG_ Sewmees4L RCMU 009 Federal Energy Regulatory R g S44 nfteF n"" RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 332 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-13 (CIP, General Enq, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Copies Copies— Mag Yeses When Aln \A/hen nl., City Clerk 8 Easements "�, R Mfr,9D S44 After QG ,� Longer der fapr &_9D RequiredRequired Cneineerin. Mag— aFes— Department Dreverenee _ngin=_....� !eGtr'..m+.,Drawings /As Beilts / Sew PtGMU-9a1 P P Mfr, ODD �l After (Engineering has originals); GG RGMU Reee� Drawings Ppr &-QD §34A9�7 Engineerina gisp�ef- Disposal of Mag, Fes— —..�...—_....� ' Department Dre+e renee• /'`(`D Cve-rn-v'-•'reG.vess L D(`I\ArcvMU 012 Tests-InspeGtions, Co--St'udie� r MfF-e� �l ^After--QG � §337,.+ Seq., GG§34090 RGMU Ptep9Ft&} 2-years 2 years Ppr &-9D Cneineerina Engine_ g Cnnility Histories /infrastrUGture Mag—, Department DreferenGe• GG Sues-- RGMU 013 Desi P P M#r, OD, S44 ^�� RGMU n Ppr &QD g Generator Operation Logs Q_ Mag— � Lead ¢ Inspeptions Foxed /Stationary 3 years 3 years _ nn�n� S4+ After QG GeneFators- Ppr &-9D Generator Operation I o u_ Mag— Yes: AQMD Rule 1470; Form Lead d De RGMLJ 015 Insper.tiens Portable / 5 years 5 years S44 After QG 409—E1-3a OnstWotions; GG E.,,ergeney r_ene fato f Ppr &-9D §34099 Cneineerine joint Pole Agreements, History ' Department Dreferenee• GG Sues-- RGMU 916nterianee (Gard P P M#r, AD, S44 After 11 PGMI� Pff &QD g Engineering loin+Dole lnyoiees / noeeu Mag—, ServmeesT RGMU 017 years 5 years M#r, OD, S44 ">�G muniewpal government auditing Deee'..a hle RCMU �"" '� Ppf &QD Department Dre+e renee• `( v�T n�GtlU 018 ear Reeords 0 years 10 years S44 After QG RCMU Ppf &OD g RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 333 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-14 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). _ngin ....g Payments /Credit Parr) ReGein+c Mag—' DepaFtmeRt nrnfe Fenoe (meet6 Ser�eTT RGMU 019 RGMU 5 gears S years 844 After QG auditing standards); GG§34 RGMU PLRF &OD C.,..�nnnrinn _ngin=_....g Power Operations Reports / ' Department DrefnrenGe; GG Sepvaoes4- RGMU--020 Outage Reports a-0-years 10 years S44 After r"" RGMU Per &OD Engineering inde#+n.te I.,�'�, e— Mag— Yew_ T 1 n 5 nos �i After Data i� n+nrrnln+ +• r_n§340an RGMU years PLRF &--QD Engineering Mag Yes- Department PFefe Fenee -"�"'-- � Dn....�r Trading /D.�...nr Cnh.�.�l�Alin.. Completion nl.�fi.�n i ' C � / DGM I n2� T years years 2 years MfF,AD �I n�nBn '` -standards 5 �T i-c'vrmv-vzz /!`hn..L n�h\A/nrL r.h.,.,+r.\ �� r -ar�`r RGM RPIF CngirieeFin. Power ng M g-_..�...=_....� ng/Power nnnnr+w.nn+Drnfn rnn.�n• (_'!` SermoesT RGMU 023 (Genf 3 years 4 dears 5 years M#r �� S44 ^�C RGMU f PLPF &QD FingineeFimg Power Trading/Power SGheduling aq—, *� Department GG vneFv'-rnu--cn-`.r-/r fFVfVK7-024 years 4 years Mtl�-Ctr S44 fterQG r /Dn+h'nn Choo+c\ RGMU PLPF &QD €ngineeFimg y Ageney-Audits: G€G, Mag- *F nnnar+meRt Dr f r noe; GG SepvPmoess4- RGMU 025 GFTr�GEPA, FERC,ERG, 10 years 10 years S44 After QG RCMU&Gas NPDES�€ �etC.C Rpf &01) 0 Engineer Regulatory Agency Compliance Mag Y._ Serf ee�T Confirmations: , years10 $ S i ^ G Department PFefeFenee; GG RCMU Gil& I E E�E€R�P€R� &OD �34099 N�€S�€GG-ete. � Regulatory nnnnr.., Cnn' inn ^- p trtlrrcSpc�.QerFc�: , GPv�€42rr �0Department PFeferenee; GG - C e.PAC,,S / nnfr nn S44 After nn RCM Gras FERG, NERG_aiDDES,W€GG— years years e §34090 eta RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 334 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-15 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). �� ;. .,... Regulatory AgeRGY Inspections: Yes: ServmGesT RGMU 028 GPILIG, EPA, FERG, NERG, 0 years 10 years MfF, 9D 844 ^ F QC €�GMU &Gas NPDES WEf_-- etc. RpF &m g EngineeY1ee Regulatory Age Gy Licenses: Mag- Yes: .. .. ....� nen.,r+.,,en+ GGDreferenee. r v�T IVtI;:V 029 I G Eye"-,, FERG,NERG, R R MfF, D, S44 "r TQG ' g RGMU &Gas NPD€S WEGG,etc. PPF &_99 Data Databases S nnn ne+ehese /Flee+roe;+.) inde#Fnit: L,�'�f n'te Mag— Yes #GMU 038 ^ems ^ems yes S44 After QG stored are recivared far 5. RGMU Aecluis4tion) years years PiN &OD cWRGB Order 2022 0103 Data +erreie+e+. Database, — where sewer reoerds rv. he Ene' `ee" 9 ernnn Drin+.�h� /D�n, r+� / . When No When Ne c+.r.d a red fer 31 Beek$ F F S44 After QG SWRGQ Order nnnn 0103 RGMU Required Required RK &QD D_WQ�Preliminary drafts Of not- drafts,then 2. • rr §§3409n 246 7 EngirieeFi-g ar Power Operat Department Dreferenee• GG ServaoesT RGMd 032 10 dears 10 dears Mfg �� S44 "�� Data Logs s /noe.•es g RGMU Ppf &QD Underground Service Alerts Mag—, Y, Department Preference Lead new � years 3„ears � + Q (req u red for 3 years); GG �� S44n�Pff §§421 2(d) u_ 4216 3(d) 340on RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 335 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENGINEERING SERVICES Page ENG-16 (CIP, General Eng, Land Dev. Transportation) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Work Orders /Serviee Requests indefin'te_ indefin'te_ Yes— where sewer reeerds stored are rr ,CMMS DATABASE "rl f .or G � nnOr,Om��m G s nnOr,Om��m G s _ nnfr nn �� � ,,,. , eaFsi- �-r (Computerized nn"in+„n.,n..,, '""'�� c\n/orR nr,+„r nnnn nnnn Management agem nt System) years years ��r �rQQ et se'"., 3312 r_r §34090 Dovosmon We*Orders/SeNiee Reques - When No When Ne Mag—, Yes—, All Information Entered in CRAMS After nG 0 Preliminary drafts(the databa6e Servoee Database Required WAFIE Required PPIF �r QQ NOT enteFed in GMMS Database sewer r.rds ..who..h are D'v'soon (eF...,r+ial information Mere! 'nte „A__ Ye�_ red for F"ears Co o / RGMU 036 5 years 5 years S44 After QG Order 2022 0103 DWQ� GGP &-QD §§3met se" , 'g--met seg-=3� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 336 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Page ENV-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS C. giReer­ Mag, Yes: Department preference Environment ENV-001 CCTV-Storm Drains 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC (Preliminary drafts); GC§34090 al Programs Ppr &OD C r, Construction Diversion/Deposit, Mag, Yes: 10 ears 10ears Mfr Servoee Department preference; GC Environment ENV-002 Reimbursement, etc. y y , OD, S/ I After QC §34090 al Programs Ppr &OD ERgSiReerii�`� Department preference; "ServiceFOG (Fats, Oil &Grease)/Source Mag, Yes: Monitoring records required for � i Environment ENV-003 Control/Pretreatment Annual/ 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 3 years; POTW reports are al Programs Semi-Annual Reports Ppr &OD required for 3 years;40 CFR 403.12; GC§34090 Cn "� Household Hazardous Waste/ Mag, Yes:Sewmee 14 CCR 18813.4; 22 CCR ENV-u04 Recycling/Disposal/Participant 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Environment Logs Ppr &OD 66262.40 et seq.; GC§34090 al Programs Engin,,,r; Required for a minimum of 5 Service Sanitary Spills ills and Overflows Mag, Yes: years; SWRCB Order 2022- Environment ENV-005 (SSOs) 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 0103-DWQ; 2002 0103 n�nin al Programs Ppr &OD &2006-03;40 CFR 122.410)(2); GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 337 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Page ENV-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department preference; SSMPs Sewer System Management Plans are required to be retained 5 Engi��- rii- y g years, and updated every 6 ��' e g (SSMP)and Audits/Sanitary Mag, Yes: SeRdGeT Superseded + Superseded years; SSOs are required for a E 5ears + 5 NV-006 Spills Overflow Prevention Plan Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Environment (SSOPP)and Sanitary Sewer y years Ppr &OD minimum of 5 years;40 CFR al Programs 122.410)(2); SWRCB General Overflow Response Plan Order�' 006 03; Q �2022-0103- DWQ; GC§34090 Department preference; SIB Solid Waste Reduction/ 1383 compliance is required for Engineerii-9 Recycling/AB 939 Compliance/ Ma Yes: 5 years; Low-Carbon Fuel ServmoeT y g p g' ENV-007 Tonnage Reports/SB 1383 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Standard regulations credits can Environment be received for 10 years, and al Programs Compliance(Organic Waste Ppr &OD Collection and Recycling) are eligible for an extension; 14 CCR§ 18995;.2 H&S§39730.7; GC§34090 et seq. Gn Enginee Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Environment ee ENV-008 Solid Waste Tonnage/AB 939 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 al Programs Ppr &OD ^g:^eei„� Required for a minimum of 5 T Mag, Yes: years;40 CFR 122.410)(2); ENV-009 Stormwater Illicit Discharges 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC SWRCB Order 2006-03;40 Environment OD& Ppr CFR§§122.21, 122.41, 122.44; al Programs yea-% GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 338 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Page ENV-3 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). En, inee i Department Preference; Sewmee Stormwater Monitoring/NPDES Mag, g required Ma Yes: Monitoring records for T Environment E Monitoring and Inspection NV-010 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 3 years; 40 CFR§§122.21, al Programs Ppr &OD 122.41, 122.44; CCP§337 et seq. Enginee i9 Required for a minimum of 5 Sewm e , Mag, Yes: years;40 CFR 122.410)(2); Environment ENV-011 Stormwater: Business Inspections 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC SWRCB Order 2006-03;40 al Programs Ppr &OD CFR§§122.21, 122.41, 122.44; GC§34090 Engineerimg Department preference; ServmoeT Stormwater: NPDES Annual Mag' Yes: Monitoring records required for Environment ENV-012 5ears 5ears Mfr, Reports y years p OD, S/I After QC 3 years; 40 CFR§§122.21, al Programs 122.41, 122.44 Engineering Department Preference; Serv!Ge" Ma Yes: Monitoring records required for T 9, 9 q Expiration + 5 Expiration + Yes: Until ENV-013 Stormwater: NPDES Permits Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 3 years; 40 CFR§§122.21, Environment years 5 years Expiration al Programs Ppr &OD 122.41, 122.44; CCP§337 et seq. Department preference; plans €ngn, must be updated every 5 years, T Stormwater: TMDL Plan (Total Mag, Yes: audits are required every 2 ENV-014 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Environment Maximum Daily Load) Plan p P r &OD years; SWRCB Order 2006-03; al Programs 40 CFR§§122.21, 122.41, 122.44; GC§34090 Engineering Water QualityManagement Plans Ma Yes: ServiGeT g g'ENV-015 (Commercial, Private P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department preference; GC Environment §34090 al Programs Development) Ppr &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 339 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-1 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING Department Preference; IRS:4 Finance/ 1099's/ 1096's/DE542 years after tax is due or paid Accounting Mag,M� Yes: After (longer for auditing &contractor &Financial FIN-001 (California Report of Independent 2 years 3 years 5 years _Ppr S I QC&OD delinquency); Ca. FTB: 3 years; Reporting Contractors) IRS Reg§31.6001-1(e)(2), R&T §19530, GC§§34090, 60201 Accounts Payable/Invoices and May contain Fire District Finance/ Backup independent contractor's Accounting Yes: Until Mag, Mfr, Yes: After compensation, expense &Financial FIN-002 (Includes Invoices,Travel 2 years 5 years 7 years Paid OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD 4- reimbursement, or District credit R Year card records; Meets municipal Reporting Expense Reimbursements, Warrant Request, etc.) government auditing standards; GC§§60201(d)(12), 34090 Finance/ Accounts Receivable - Department preference; Meets Accounting Miscellaneous -Damage to Mag, Mfr, Yes: After &Financial FIN-003 Public Property, Invoices to 2 Years 3 years 5 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD auditing standards; GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. Reporting Outside Entities, etc. Finance/ Department Preference (meets Accounting Mag, Mfr, Yes: After & Financial FIN-004 Audit Work Papers 2 years 3 years 5 years �Ppr S�I QC&OD municipal government auditing standards); GC§§34090, 60201 Reporting Finance/ Accounting Audits-Annual Financial Mag,� Yes: After Department Preference GC &Financial FIN-004.1 Reports 2 years P P _Ppr S I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 Reporting Finance/ Audits-Single Audits, Grant Department Preference (meets Accounting Audits, IRS Audits, 3 years after 5 years after Mag,_ Yes: After & Financial FIN-005 Transportation Audits, PERS 2 Years Audit Audit _Ppr S I QC&OD municipal government auditing Reporting Audit, etc. standards);GC§§34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 340 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-2 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Bank Statements and Trustee Finance/ Statements, Fiscal Agent Department Preference; meets Accounting Statements, Investment Account Mag, Mfr, Yes: After auditing standards; GC r QC&OD&Financial FIN-006 Statements, Bank 2 years 5 years 7 years OD P S I p §§60201(d)(12), 34090, 26 CFR Reporting Reconciliations, Bank Deposits, 31.6001-1 Bank Transmittal Advice Bonds(Revenue)Official Department Preference; Statute Statements/Transcripts/ of Limitations for bonds, Certificates of Participations mortgages,trust deeds, notes or Finance/ debentures is 6 years; Bonds (COPs)- Includes Continuing Fully Fully Accounting Yes: Until Mag, Mf1 Yes: After issued by local governments are & Financial FIN-007 Disclosure Reports, and all Defeased + Defeased + Maturity OD Ppr S�I QC&OD 10 years; There are specific Reporting Special District Bonds 10 years 10 years requirements for disposal of See Bank Statements for unused bonds; CCP§§336 et statement retention. seq. 337.5(a); 26 CFR 1.6001- 1(e): GC§43900 et seq. Finance/ Department Preference; meets Accounting Budget Appropriation Transfer Mag, Mf1 Yes: After & Financial FIN-007.1 Requests 2 years 5 years 7 years �Ppr S�I QC&OD auditing standards; GC Reporting §§34090, 60201 Finance/ CaIPERS Reports-Annual Accounting Mag, Mf1 Yes: After Department Preference; GC &Financial FIN-008 Valuation Reports, Actuarial 2 years 2 years 7 years _Ppr S I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 Reporting Valuation Reports Finance/ Cash Receipts/Daily Cash Department preference; Meets Accounting Mag, Mfr, Yes: After & Financial FIN-009 Summaries/Cashiers Reports/ 2 years 3 years 5 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD auditing standards; GC Reporting Cash Reports/Petty Cash §§34090, 60201 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 341 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-3 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). May contain Fire District Finance/ independent contractor's Accounting Mag, Mfr, Yes: After compensation, expense FIN-010 Checks/Warrants (Cashed) 3 years 4 years 7 years S/I reimbursement, or District credit & Financial OD, Ppr QC&OD Reporting card records; Meets municipal government auditing standards; GC§§34090, 60201(d)(12) Finance/ Department preference; Collections/Collection Agency Accounting Mag,� Yes: After Delinquencies remain on credit & Financial FIN-011 Case Files&Statements/ 7 years 7 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD reports for 7 years; GC Reporting Delinquent Accounts §§34090, 60201 et seq. DE-6, DE-7, DE-9, DE-43,W-3, & DE-166, 941 Forms, IRS 5500 Department Preference; IRS:4 Finance/ Forms(Employee Benefit Plans), yrs after tax is due or paid; Ca. Accounting Mag,� Yes: After FTB: 3 years; IRS Reg FIN-012 PERS/FICA&Medicare 5 years 2 years 7 years S/ &Financial Adjustments-Quarterly Payroll _Ppr QC&OD §31.6001-1(e)(2), R&T§19530; Reporting Tax Returns/OASDI, Federal 29CFR 516.5-516.6, 29USC Tax Deposits,Adjustments, etc. 436, GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ Produced by Deferred Comp. Accounting Deferred Compensation (City Mag,� Yes: After &Financial FIN-013 Statements) 2 years 5 years 7 years _OD Ppr S I QC&OD Provider; GC§34090, 26 CFR Reporting 31.6001.1 Department preterence;All Finance/ tangible property held by government agencies escheats Accounting FIN-014 5 years 5 years Escheat(Unclaimed money/ Mag, Mfr, S/I y Yes: After after 3 ears; Statute of & Financial uncashed checks) _Ppr QC&OD Limitations is 1 year for seized Reporting property; CCP§§340(d), 1355. 1519; GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 342 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-4 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Finance/ Accounting FEMA Reimbursement/OES Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC & Financial FIN-015 Reimbursements 1 year 9 years 10 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 Reporting Finance/ Data is interrelated; Meets Indefinite- Indefinite- municipal government auditing Accounting Mag, Mfr, Yes: After FIN-016 Financial Services Database Minimum 7 Minimum 7 Yes S/I standards; May include & Financial OD, Ppr QC&OD Reporting years years Employee Reimbursement; GC §§34090; 60201(d)(12) Department Preference (bond auditing purposes; IRS Finance/ regulations state, "...material Accounting Mag,� Yes: After records should generally be kept & Financial OD Ppr FIN-017 Fixed Assets 2 years 3 years 5 years S/I QC&OD for as long as the bonds are Reporting outstanding, plus 3 years after the final redemption date of the bonds"); 26 CFR 1.6001-1(e); GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ Department Preference; meets Accounting Journal Entries/Journal Mag,M� Yes: After auditing standards; GC &Financial FIN-018 Vouchers 2 years 5 years 7 years _OD Ppr S I QC&OD §§60201(d)(12), 34090, 26 CFR Reporting 31.6001-1 Department preference; W-4s are required four years after the Finance/ due date of such tax for the Payroll File (By Employee Name) return period to which the Accounting Separation + Separation + Mag,� Yes: After FIN-019 5 years S/I records relate, or the date such &Financial Includes W-4, other payroll forms 2 years 7 years _Ppr QC&OD tax is paid,whichever is the Reporting later. 26 CFR 31-6001-1; GC §60201(d)(1 2); GC§§34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 343 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-5 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Finance/ Department preference for Accounting Mag, Mfr, Yes:After & Financial FIN-020 Payroll Reports-Annual Detail P P OD, Ppr S/ I QC&OD SBCERA Buy-backs; GC Reporting §§34090, 60201 Department preference for Grant Auditing Purposes; May contain Finance/ Payroll Reports-Periodic independent contractor's Accounting (includes Deduction Registers, Mag,M� Yes: After compensation, expense FIN-021 2 years 5 years 7 years S/I reimbursement, or District credit & Financial Leave Registers, Time OD Ppr QC&OD Reporting Transaction Reports, etc.) card records; Meets municipal government auditing standards; GC§60201(d)(1 2); GC§§34090, 60201 Reports/Finance Reports created from Database; Finance/ Subsidiary Ledgers, Department preference (The When No When No Financial System Database is Accounting Longer Longer Reconciliations, Registers, Mag,� S/I Yes: After FIN-022 the original; reports are &Financial Transaction Histories, Balance OD Ppr QC&OD Reporting Sheets, Revenue&Expenditure Required Required considered drafts or copies); GC Reports, etc. (MONTHLY OR §§34090, 60201 PERIODIC) Reports: Annual State or Finance/ Federal: State Controller's Department Preference; Meets Accounting Report, Local Government Mag, Mfr, Yes: After &Financial FIN-023 Compensation Report, Gas Tax, 2 Years 3 years 5 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD auditing standards; GC Reporting MOE (Maintenance of Effort) §§34090, 60201 Report, Street Report, etc. Finance/ Department Preference; Meets Accounting Mag, Yes: After &Financial FIN-024 Returned Checks/NSF Checks 5 years 5 years _OD Ppr S�I QC&OD auditing standards; GC Reporting §§34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 344 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-6 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Finance/ Department preference for Grant Accountin Time Sheets/Time Cards/ Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Auditing Purposes; Meets g &Financial FIN-025 Overtime Sheets/Overtime 2 years 5 years 7 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD 2- municipal government auditing Reporting Cards years standards; GC§60201(d)(12); GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ Department Preference; this is a Accounting Vehicle Titles (Pink Slips)-All Sale or Sale or Mag, & Financial FIN-025.1 Vehicles Disposal Disposal �,Ppr S/I State record, must be given to the buyer; GC§§34090, 60201 Reporting Finance/ Department preference for Grant Accounting Mag,� Yes: After Auditing Purposes; Meets & Financial FIN-026 W-2's 2 years 5 years 7 years Ppr SS�II QC&OD municipal government auditing 1 Reporting standards; GC§60201(d)( 2); GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ Vendor Vendor Accounting Yes: Until Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Meets IRS auditing standards; &Financial FIN-027 W-9s Inactive + 3 Inactive + 3 Paid OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 Reporting years years RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 345 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-7 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). FINANCE/BUDGET MANAGEMENT Budgets-Preliminary, Proposed, Finance/ Backup Documents When No When No Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Preliminary drafts; GC§§34090, Budget FIN-028 Longer Longer _Ppr SS�II QC&OD 60201 Manage. (The Final Budget is maintained Required Required by the City Clerk FINANCE/BUSINESS LICENSE&REVENUE Finance/ Indefinite- Indefinite Data Fields/Records are - Business Business License& Permit Mag, Yes: After interrelated; meets municipal License& FIN-029 Database Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Yes OD, Ppr S I QC&OD government auditing standards; Revenue years years GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ I Department preference (Used by Business Business License& Permit Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Planning for Zoning License& FIN-030 Applications and Changes P P OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD Clearances); GC§§34090, Revenue 60201 et seq. Finance/ Department preference (meets Business Business License& Permit Mag, Mfr, Yes: After municipal government auditing License& FIN-031 Renewals 5 years 5 years _OD Ppr S I QC&OD requirements); GC§§34090, Revenue i I I I 1 1 160201 et seq. FINANCE/SPECIAL DISTRICTS Assessment Districts, Street Finance/ Lighting and Landscape Districts Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department preference; GC Special FIN-031.5 Formation and Boundaries/ P P OD, Ppr S�II QC&OD §§34090, 60201 Districts Engineer's Reports (Proposed Annual Assessments for Districts) Assessment Rolls/Lighting and Finance/ Department preference; Meets Landscape Districts/Special Mag, Yes: After Special FIN-032 District Assessment Rolls(to Tax 5 years 5 years OD Ppr S�I QC&OD auditing standards; GC Districts §§34090, 60201 et seq. Assessor for Tax Rolls) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 346 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-8 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, com taints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight Committee Department preference; Finance/ (Landscape Maintenance Formerly Planned Communities Special FIN-033 Districts/Special Districts) 2 years 2 years GD Citizens'Oversight Committee; Districts State law only requires for 30 AUDIO RECORDINGS of days; GC§54953.5(b) Meetings/Audio Tapes Community Parks and Landscape Finance Citizens' Oversight Committee Yes: After Formerly Planned Communities / Special FIN-034 (Landscape Maintenance P P Yes Mag, Mfr, S/I QC&OD Citizens'Oversight Committee; Districts Districts/Special Districts) OD, Ppr NoSend originals to the City Clerk; GC§§34090, 60201.7 MINUTES Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight Committee Department preference; Finance/ and Landscape Maintenance Formerly Planned Communities Districts Citizens'Oversight Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Citizens'Oversight Committee; Districts Special FIN-035 Committee years years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD Original Staff Reports are filed in the project file; GC§§34090, AGENDAS &AGENDA 60201 PACKETS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 347 Ver. 24.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: FINANCE Page FIN-9 (Accounting and Financial Reporting, Budget Man., Business Lic. Rev., Special Districts, Treasury Man.) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). FINANCE/TREASURY MANAGEMENT Finance/ When No When No Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Preliminary drafts not retained in Treasury FIN-036 Bankruptcies-NOT pursued Longer Longer ODp Ppr S/ II QC&OD the ordinary course of business; Manage. Required Required GC§§34090, 60201 Finance/ Department Preference Bankruptcies-Where a claim is Mag,M� Yes: After (negative information remains on Treasury FIN-037 filed 10 years 10 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD credit ratings for 7 years); GC Manage. §§34090, 60201 Finance/ Investment Reports&Backup/ Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Treasury FIN-038 Treasury Reports 2 years 3 years 5 years _Ppr SS�II QC&OD §§34090, 60201 Manage. Investments/Arbitrage/ I Department Preference; Meets Finance/ Certificate of Deposit/Investment Yes: Until Mag,r, Yes: After auditing standards; FTC Reg's Treasury FIN-039 Bonds(Receipts/Advisor 5 years 5 years S/ Paid _OD Ppr QC&OD rely on"self-enforcement"; Manage. Reports /Trade Tickets/LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)) GC§§ 34090,43900 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 348 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). HUMAN RESOURCES Duration of Duration of EEOC/ADEA(Age)requires the Contract the Contract and/or and/or 1 year after benefit plan Benefit Plan Documents Yes: For termination; State Law Human disposition of disposition of Mag,� Yes: After Resources HR-001 (CaIPERS, Optical, Dental, any any Duration of OD Ppr S/I QC&OD requires 2 years after action; etc.) enforcement enforcement Contract 29 CFR 1627.3(b);29 USC action +2 action +2 1027; GC§§12946, 12960, y 34090, 60201 ears years Bureau of National Affairs recommends 2 years for all Classification/Reorganization supplementary Personnel Human HR-002 Studies(for employee Minimum 3 Minimum 3 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After records; Wage rate tables are Resources classifications and department years years _Ppr S I QC&OD 1 or 2 years; State requires 2 structures) years; 29 CFR 516.6, 29 CFR 1602.14, GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201 Bureau of National Affairs recommends 2 years for all supplementary Personnel Human Compensation Surveys& Minimum 3 Minimum 3 Mag,� Yes: After records; Wage rate tables are Resources HR-003 Studies years years OD Ppr S I QC&OD 1 or 2 years; State requires 2 years; 29 CFR 516.6M, 29 CFR 1602.14, GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201 u v �. na . rTm7rarr � years $ �- �-c�-�cr w..,I...�.,.,.- �13LG 'C -pf RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 349 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department Preference; statute of limitations for retirement benefits is 6 years from last action; California Civil Rights EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Department(CRD)/ requires 3 years for Human Department of Fair Final Final Mag, Mfr, Yes: After promotion, demotion, Resources Employment& Housing (DFEH OD Ppr HR-004 Disposition + Disposition + S/I QC&OD transfer, selection, or or EEOC)Claims/Harassment 4 years 4 years discharge; State Law requires Claims 4 years; 29 CFR 1602.14, 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§12946, 12960, 34090; 29 USC 1113, LC§1198.5, 6 CFR 31.6001-1(e)(2); GC §3105 2 years After 2 years After Human HR-005 DMV Pull Notices Superseded, Superseded, Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Resources or Upon or Upon OD Ppr S I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Separation Separation RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 350 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-3 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department preference; D.O.T. Requires 5 years for positive tests, 1 year for negative tests; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Human Drug &Alcohol Test Results Mag,— Yes: After requires 3 years physical Resources HR-006 (All -Positives and Negatives) 6 years 6 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD examinations; State Law requires 2 years; 29 CFR 1627.3(b)(1)(v), GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201;49 CFR 655.71 et seq.;49 CFR 382.401 et seq. 49 CFR 653.71 Human Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 29 CFR 1602.30; 29 CFR Resources HR-006.1 EEO-4 Reports 3 years 3 years OD Ppr S/ I QC&OD 1602.31, 29 CFR 1602.32; GC§34090, 60201 Department preference;All State and Federal laws Minimum Minimum require retention until final Human Final Final Mag, Mfr Yes: After disposition of formal Resources HR-007 Employee Investigations Disposition + Disposition + OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD complaint; State requires 4 4 years 4 years years after"fully and finally disposed"; 2 CCR 11013 "�; GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201 Ethics Training Certificates/ Human HR-008 Harassment Prevention 5 years 5 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After GC§§53235.2(b), Resources Training Certificates OD Ppr QC&OD 53237.2(b), 34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 351 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-4 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Required for 1 year from termination or 3 years from hiring,whichever is later; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Human Separation + Separation + Mag, Mfr, Yes: After requires 3 years for"any Resources HR-009 I-9s 3 years 3 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD other forms of employment inquiry"; State Law requires 2 3 years; 8 CFR 274a.2; 29 CFR 1627.3(b)(1); GC §§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201 Department preference; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) requires 3 years for promotion, demotion, Yes: After Mfr,Human Job Descriptions , Minimum Minimum Mag,P transfer, selection, or / HR-010 Superseded Superseded S/I discharge; State Law requires Resources Classification Specifications +6 years +6 years OD, pr QC&OD 4 years; retirement benefits is 6 years from last action; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§12946, 34090, 60201 Labor Relations Files Human 5(Negotiation Notes, Minimum 5 Minimum 10 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Resources HR-011 Correspondence, Interpretation years years years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. of MOU Provisions, Documentation, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 352 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-5 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department Preference; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) requires 3 years for Personnel Files-Background promotion, demotion, Human Separation + ISeparation +1 Mag, Mfr, Yes: After transfer, selection, or Resources HR-012 Files(Fire, Executives, 3 years 3 years 6 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD discharge; State Law requires Information Technology) 4 years; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§3105, 12946, 12960, 34090, 60201; 29 USC 1113 Department Preference; statute of limitations for retirement benefits is 6 years Personnel Files- Benefit File from last action; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Includes Application, requires 3 years for Human Separation + Separation + Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Resources HR-013 Evaluations, Policies, Oaths of 3 years 3 years 6 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD promotion, demotion, Office, PAFs(Personnel transfer, selection, or Action Forms), etc. discharge; State Law requires 4 years; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§3105, 12946, 12960, 34090, 60201; 29 USC 1113 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 353 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-6 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department Preference; statute of limitations for Personnel Files-Employee retirement benefits is 6 years File from last action; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Human Includes Application, Separation + Separation + Mag, Mfr, Yes: After requires 3 years for Resources HR-014 Evaluations, Policies, Oaths of 3 years 3 years 6 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD promotion, demotion, Office, PAFs(Personnel transfer, selection, or Action Forms), etc. discharge; State Law requires 4 years; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§3105, 12946, 12960, 34090, 60201; 29 USC 1113 Whichever Whichever is Department preference; Files Personnel Files-Medical File is Longer: Longer: maintained separately; (all employees) 24 years, or Separation + Claims can be made for 30 Termination 30 years, or Yes: After years for toxic substance Human of Benefits Separation + Termination Yes: Until Mag, Mfr S/I, QC&OD exposure; 8 CCR 5144, 8 HR-015 Pre-employment Medical Resources Clearances, ADA 6 years +5 years, of Benefits+ Separation OD, Ppr Sep.,..,.;en y CCR 15400.2; 8 CCR Accommodations, Respirator or Death of 5 years, or 1 year §3204(d)(1)et seq., 29 CFR Fit Tests, etc. Employee+ Death of 1910.1020(d)(1)(i), GC 5 years Employee + 5 §§12946, 12960, 34090, years 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 354 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-7 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department Preference; statute of limitations for retirement benefits is 6 years Personnel Files-Training File from last action; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Includes Application, requires 3 years for Human Separation + Separation + Mag, Mfr Yes: After Resources HR-016 Evaluations, Policies, Oaths of 3 years 3 years 6 years OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD promotion, demotion, Office, PAFs(Personnel transfer, selection, or Action Forms), etc. discharge; State Law requires 4 years; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), GC§§3105, 12946, 12960, 34090, 60201; 29 USC 1113 Department preference; Per NeoGov Policy; 29 CFR Human Recruitment Database Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 1627.3(b)(1), 29 CFR Resources HR-027 (NeoGov) 5 years 5 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD 1602.14; 2 CCR 11013(c); GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 60201 Recruitment and Testing File State Law requires 4 years (Includes Advertisements, EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age) Human Applications for Unsuccessful Hiring Hiring Mag, Mfr Yes: After requires 1-3 years; ; 29 CFR Resources HR-017 Candidates, Interview Notes, Decision +4 Decision +4 OD Ppr SS�II QC&OD 1627.3(b)(1), 29 CFR Job Brochures, Test Data, years years 1602.14; 2 CCR 11013 Testing Analysis&statistical 728.0(c)(2), GC§§12946, Metric, Job Analysis, Rating 12960, 34090, 60201 Sheets, Scantrons, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 355 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-8 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Human Studies&Surveys Conducted Mag, Mfr, Yes: After 2 years, unless it is a Resources HR-018 on Behalf of the City(Sick 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/ I QC&OD preliminary draft; GC Leave,Attrition, Benefits, etc.) §§34090, 60201 et seq. Not an AgenGy Verifications of Employment, 2 years 2 Vears Content d n�eG Fdrelate Human Child Support: Third party When Ne `^'moo Mag,� Yes: After oesResources HR-018.5 form requests for verification of Longer Longer OD Ppr S/I QC&OD substantive way to the � p employment, child support, etc. Required- ^„„r!un+of the „uhliob busines-,, GC§34090 et seq Workplace Violence-Hazard Human HR-0186 5ears 5 identification, evaluation, Mag,� Yes: After Resources . correction, incident logs, y years _Ppr S/I QC&OD LC§6401.9(f), GC§34090 investigations, etc. RISK MANAGEMENT Accident/Incident Reports/ Human Injury Reports (Potential Mag,� Yes: After Department preference; CCP Resources/ HR-019 Claims-medical and non- 32 years 3-2 years QQ Ppr S/I QC&OD §340.5, GC§§34090, 60201 Risk Manag. medical that do not result in a et seq. claim.) Human Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Resources/ HR-020 Claim Runs 5 years 5 years _Ppr all II QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Risk Manag. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 356 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-9 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Claim must be filed within 6 months, lawsuit within 2 years; complaints against Human Yes: After peace officers within 5 years; S/I QC&OD Resources HR-021 Claims (Includes Litigated Resolution + Yes: Until Mag, Mfr, Statute of Limitations for / Resolution 5 years Risk Manag. Claims) 5 years Resolution OD, Ppr Settled contracts is 4 years;wrongful death for construction is completion + 5 years; CCP§§ 337 et seq.; GC§§911.2, 34090, 34090.6, 60201 Human Insurance Polices(City-owned Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Resources/ HR-022 P P S/I Risk Manag. policies) OD, Ppr QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. OSHA requires 5 years; State Human OSHA Logs-200, 300, 301, law requires 2 years; 8 CCR P Resources/ HR-023 301A, OSHA Inspections or 5 years 5 years Mag, Mfr, S/I Yes: After 14300.33, 8 CCR Risk Manag. Citations OD, pr QC&OD §3203(b)(1), GC§34090; L�C_ e Human Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Resources/ HR-024 Subpoenas/Summons 2 years 2 years OD, Ppr S/I QC'd&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Risk Manag. Human Workers Compensation Claim Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Meets auditing standards; GC Resources/ HR-025 Runs/Monthly Reports 5 years 5 years OD Ppr S/I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Risk Manag. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 357 Ver. 21.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Page HR-10 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti at'on, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retentionperiods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Whichever Whichever is Department preference; Files is Longer: Longer: maintained separately; Workers Compensation Claims 20 years, or Separation + Claims can be made for 30 Human /Long Term Disability Claims Termination 30 years, or years for toxic substance Benefits Separation + Termination Yes: Until Mag, Mfr, Yes: After exposure; 8 CCR 5144, 8 Resources HR-026 (Includes all Accident, Incident, 10 years + of Benefits+ Separation OD, Ppr S I QC&OD CCR 15400.2; 8 CCR Risk Manag. or Injury Reports from +5 years, 5 years, or §3204(d)(1)et seq., 29 CFR Employees) or Death of Death of 1910.1020(d)(1)(i), GC Employee+ Employee + 5 §§12946, 12960, 34090, 5 years years 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 358 ver. 7.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: LIBRARY Page L-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper Active Total Media 1=Import (OFR) (Off-site, Vital? after (in office) OD or Mfr) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits,pending records requests, and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement). LIBRARY Board of Library Trustees Yes: Brown Act challenges must be Mfr, Library LIB-001 P P Yes Mag, S/I After QCfiled within 30 or 90 days of action; AGENDA PACKETS&AGENDAS OD, Ppr &OD 4& GC§§34090, 54960.1(c)(1) yearBoard of Library Trustees Library LIB-002 2 years 2 years Mag City Clerk maintains these AUDIO RECORDINGS of Meetings Permanently; GC§34090.7 /Audio Tapes Board of Library Trustees Yes: Library LIB-003 P P Yes Mag, Mfr, S/I After QC GC§34090 MINUTES OD, Ppr &OD 40- s Cash Receipts Report/ Detail/ Yes: Lead Dept. LIB-004 Backup/Accounts Receivable 2 years 2 years Mag, Mfr OD Ppr S/I After QC City preference(not all detail is & Finance Detail/Refund Detail &OD sent to Finance); GC§34090 Mag, Mfr, Yes: Library LIB-005 Complaints and Compliments 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I After QC GC§34090 &OD When No When No Ma% Yes: Library LIB-006 Flyers for Library Programs Longer Longer _OD Ppr Mfr, S/I After QC Preliminary Drafts; GC§34090 Required Required OD &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 359 Ver. 7.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: LIBRARY Page L-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper Active Total Media 1=Import (OFR) (Off-site, Vital? after (in office) OD or Mfr) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, claims, com taints, audits, pendinq records requests, and/or investi afions suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement). Grants: LSCA(Library Services and Construction), LSTA(Library Services and Technology), SLRC (State Literacy Resource Centers), CLLS (California Library Literacy Final Final Yes: Per California State Library Library LIB-007 Services); CLSA(California Library 2 years Expenditure Expenditure Mag, Mfr, S/I After QC Records Management Program Services Act)and PLF (Public + 3 years +5 years OD Ppr &OD Requirements(April 27, 1998); GC Library Foundation)ONLY. For all §34090 others,follow City-wide Schedule. (SUCCESSFUL Reports, and Financial Information) Send copy of application and award to Finance Yes: When No When No After QC Department preference(the Library LIB-008 Library Card Applications Longer Longer Mag, Mfr,Ppr S/I &OD database is the original record); Required Required OD, When GC§34090 i nae#ive Indefinite- Indefinite- Yes: Ppr Library LIB-009 Library Systems: ILS Database Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag,Ppr S/I After QC Data is interrelated; GC§34090 years ears &OD Library Volunteer/Unpaid Intern MagYes: Library LIB-010 Applications&Agreements- 2 years 2 years _OD Ppr pr S/I After QC GC§34090 Unsuccessful or Waiting &OD Library Volunteer/Unpaid Intern Maq, Mf Yes: Library LIB-011 Logs (Hours) 2 years 2 years _Ppr S/I After QC GC§34090 &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 360 Ver. 7.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: LIBRARY Page L-3 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper Active Total Media 1=Import (OFR) (Off-site, Vital? after (in office) OD or Mfr) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, claims, com taints, audits, pending records requests, and/or investi afions suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement). Department preference(Courts treat volunteers as employees); Library Volunteers/Unpaid Intern Inactive/ Inactive/ Yes: EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age)requires Library LIB-012 Applications&Agreements- Separation + Separation + Mag, Mfr, S/I After QC 3 years for promotion, demotion, Successful 3 years 3 years OD Ppr &OD transfer, selection, or discharge; 29 CFR 1602.31 and 1627.3(b)(1)(i)&(ii), GC§§ 12960, 34090 Mag, Mfr, Yes: Library LIB-013 Passport Transmittals 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S/I After QC GC§34090 &OD Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag, Mfr, Yes: Department preference; GC Library LIB-014 Problem Patron File S/I After QC years years OD Ppr &OD §§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 361 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). PLANNING State of When ears `Zhu ears Mag, Yes: California PL-002 Alcohol Beverage Control License o o Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC (Non-Records) PlanniRg Applications (ABC Applications) Longer Longer Ppr &OD d d Annexations/Boundaries/ Mag, Yes: Planning PL-003 Consolidations/LAFCO 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Land Records; GC§34090 Ppr &OD Design Review Committee (Subcommittee of Planning Mag, Yes: Department preference; Original Planning PL-006 Commission) Minimum 2 P Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC Staff Reports are filed in the AGENDAS,AGENDA PACKETS, Years Ppr &OD project file; GC§34090 MINUTES P Entertainment Permits/Massage Expiration +2 Expiration + Mag, Yes: Department preference; Planning PL-031 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Business Permits years 2 years Ppr &OD GC§§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 362 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-2 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Not all internal communications and notes are required to be saved; "E-mails that do not provide insight into the project Environmental Impact Reports or the agency's CEQA (EIRs), Negative Declarations, compliance with respect to the etc.) /CEQA/NEPA Project Project project—are not within the Approval or Approval or Mag, Yes: scope of section 21167.6, Planning PL-033 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC subdivision (e)and need not be Correspondence and staff notes Denial +2 Denial +2 that provide insight into the project years years Ppr &OD retained." Golden Door or the agency's CEQA compliance Properties, LLC v. Superior with respect to the project Court of San Diego County (County of San Diego, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (D076605, DO76924, DO76993) (4th Dist. 2020); PRC 21167,6; GC§34090 Environmental Determinations: Usually filed in the project file; Environmental Impact Reports Final environmental (EIRs), Negative Declarations, Mag, Yes: determinations are required to Planning PL-009 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC etc.) Ppr &OD be kept a"reasonable period of Inside City boundaries, Non- p time"; 14 CCR§15095(c); GC Development Projects §34090 Environmental Determinations: Non-records; EIRs and Negative Environmental Impact Reports When No When No Maq, Yes: Declarations within the City Planning PL-010 (EIRs), Negative Declarations, Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Boundaries are with the project etc.) Required Required Ppr &OD Outside City boundaries file RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 363 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-3 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). General Plan, Elements and Mag, Yes: City Clerk Maintains all Agenda Planning PL-011 Amendments 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC Packets Permanently; GC Ppr &OD §34090.7 Historic Preservation Survey, Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC Planning PL-012 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Evaluations and Designations Ppr &OD §34090 Mag, Yes: Department preference; Planning PL-024 Historic Property Files 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§§34090 Ppr &OD Planning PL-025 Large Family Day Care Permits Expiration +2 Expiration + M OD, S/I After QC Department preference; M years 2 years Ppr &OD GC§§34090 Planning PL-013 Master Plans, Specific Plans, Land 1 year P P MM OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC Use Plans, etc. §34090 Ppr &OD When No When No Mag, Yes: Preliminary drafts not retained Planning PL-014 Materials Boards Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC in the ordinary course of Required Required Ppr &OD business; GC§34090 Mag, Yes: Department preference; Planning PL-026 Mills Act Contracts 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§§34090 Ppr &OD Planning and Historic Preservation Commission Mag, Yes: Department preference; Original Planning PL-015 AGENDAS &AGENDA 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Staff Reports are filed in the PACKETS Ppr &OD project file; GC§34090 Planning and Historic Preservation Department preference; State Planning PL-016 Commission AUDIO RECORDINGS of 2 Years 2 years BB Mag law only requires for 30 days; GC§54953.5(b) Meetings/Audio Tapes RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 364 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-4 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Planning and Historic Preservation Yes: Mf P P Yes r, O Commission Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC Planning PL-017 MINUTES, BYLAWS& &OD GC§34090 RESOLUTIONS Ppr No Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Planning PL-001 Planning Director Approvals 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 Ppr &OD Planning Project Log of Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Department Preference- Data Planning PL-018 Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I After QC is interrelated; GC§34090, H&S Ppr Applications, Database Permanent Permanent &OD §19850 Planning Project Files - Approved Entitlements (Includes Associated CEQA Project Noticing, Conditions of Approval, Approved/ Department preference; Final Public Noticing, Environmental Final Mag Yes: environmental determinations Determinations, Staff Reports, Decision, or 1 ' are required to be kept a Planning PL-019 P P Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Plans&Maps) year if Not Ppr &OD "reasonable period of time"; 14 Approved/ CCR§15095(c); GC§§34090, Examples: Conditional Use No Final 34090.7 Permits (CUPs), Design Review, Decision Parcel Maps, Site Plans,Tentative Subdivisions,Variances,Zone Changes, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 365 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-5 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Applicant's proposals/plans Preliminary Review/Courtesy can be destroyed When No When No When No Mag, Yes: Review- PLANS, PROPOSALS, Longer Required, as no Planning PL-027 Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC other Documents belonging to Required Required Ppr &OD application has been submitted, Applicant and they are not City records; GC§34090 Applicant's proposals/plans Preliminary Review/Courtesy Mag, Yes: can be destroyed When No Planning PL-020 Review- APPLICATIONS, other 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Longer Required, City Records Ppr &OD application has been submitted, and they are not City records; GC§34090 Life of Sign, rLifeofn, Mag, Yes: Department preference; Planning PL-028 Sign Permits Minimum 2 2 Mfr, OD, S/I After QCGC§§34090 years Ppr &ODMinimum 2 2 Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC Planning PL-022 Special Studies Mfr, OD, S/I After QC years years Ppr &OD §34090 Planning PL-029 Street Name Assignments and 1 year P P Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC Department preference; Changes GC§§34090 Ppr &OD Temporary Permits/Special Event Permits/Temporary Entitlements (Approved &Unapproved): ,Yes: Mag Yes: Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department preference; Planning PL-021 During Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Christmas Tree Lots, Pumpkin years years Event Ppr &OD GC§§34090 Lots, Banner Permits, Tree Removal Permits, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 366 Ver. 19.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PLANNING Page PL-6 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? /f the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Trails Committee(Subcommittee of Planning Commission) Minimum 2 Mag, Yes: Department preference; Original Planning PL-030 P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Staff Reports are filed in the AGENDAS, &AGENDA years Ppr &OD project file; GC§34090 PACKETS, MINUTES Yes: Zoning Maps(Historically Mag' After QC Department Preference; GC Planning PL-024 Significant) 1 year P P Yes(all) Mfr Significant) S/I &OD §34090.7 No Yes: 1 P P Y Mfr, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Mag' After QC Department Preference Planning PL-025 Reclassifications/Zone Change year es P,pr S/I &OD I- (copies); GC§34090.7 1 year Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Planning PL-023 Zoning Verification Letters 1 years P P Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC §34090 Ppr &OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 367 ver. 6.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PROCUREMENT Page PRO-1 Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Inactive Image: Destroy (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import Paper after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan C'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). PROCUREMENT Indefinite- Indefinite- Data Fields/Records are Procure- Procurement Database(Planet Mag, Mfr, Yes: After interrelated; meets municipal ment PUR-001 Bids) Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Yes OD, Ppr S I QC&OD government auditing standards; years years GC§34090 Department Preference; meets Procure- Mag, Mfr, Yes: After municipal government auditing ment PUR-002 Purchase Orders/Requisitions 2 years 3 years 5 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD standards; Statute of Limitations No is 4 years GC§34090, CCP§ 337 Procure- Mag, Mfr, Yes: After Department Preference; GC ment PUR-003 Request for Proposals 2 years 3 years 5 years OD Ppr S I QC&OD §34090 Department Preference; meets Procure- Mag, Mfr, Yes: After municipal government auditing ment PUR-004 Surplused Equipment/Disposal 2 years 3 years 5 years OD, Ppr S/I QC&OD standards; Statute of Limitations Ne is 4 years GC§34090, CCP§ 337 Procure- Mag, Mfr, Yes: After ment PUR-005 Unsuccessful Bids/Evaluations 2 years 2 years OD Ppr S�I QC&OD GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. (909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 368 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-1 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). PUBLIC WORKS/MAINTENANCE /FACILITIES Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. PW-001 AQMD Permits(Generators, etc.) 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD 40 CFR 70.6; GC§34090 Ppr Public Works Mag, Yes: After /Maint./ PW-002 Facility Inspections 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, a-/--I QC&OD GC§34090 Facilities Ppr Generator Operation Logs& Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. PW-003 Inspections-Fixed/Stationary 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/1 QC&OD AQMD Rule 1470; GC§34090 Generators Ppr Generator Operation Logs& Mag, AQMD Rule 1470; Form Lead Dept. PW-004 Inspections-Portable 1 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, a-/--I Yes: After 400—E-13a instructions; GC Emergency Generators Ppr QC&OD §34090 Operations& Maintenance Life of Facility Life of Mag, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Lead Dept. PW-005 Manuals(O&M Manuals) or Equipment Facility or Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD §34090 et. seq. Equipment Ppr Data is interrelated; Databases Division Work Orders/Service Requests where sewer records may be PW-006 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Providing CMMS DATABASE(Computerized Yes: After stored are required for 5 years; Service/ Maintenance Management QC&OD SWRCB Order 2022-0103- Work System) years years DWQ; CCP§§338 et seq., 340 et seq., 342, GC§34090 Work Orders/Service Requests- Providing All Information Entered in CMMS When No When No Mag, ng Yes: After Preliminary drafts(the database Service/ PW-007 Database Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD is the original); GC§34090 Work Required Required Ppr (Paper drafts) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 369 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-2 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Work Orders/Service Requests- City NOT entered in CMMS Database ; May contain Division (or partial information entered into sewer records,which are Mag, require d for 5 years: SWRCB Providing CMMS Database) Yes: After PW-008 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I Order 2022-0103-DWO; CCP Service/ QC&OD Work Division providingservice retains Ppr §§338 et seq., 340 et seq., 342; originals; Division requesting GGR ss338 et seq., 340 et sew service is considered a copy) 342—, GC§34090 MAINTENANCE /PARKS&LANDSCAPE Public Works /Maint./ Mag' Y : After Parks& PW-009 Arbor Day/Tree City USA, etc. 2 years 2 years Mfrr,, OD, S/I es es&OD GC§34090 Landscape Operations& Maintenance Life of Facility Life of Mag, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Lead Dept. PW-010 Manuals(O&M Manuals) or Equipment Facility or Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD §34090 et. seq. Equipment Ppr Public Works /Maint./ Mag' Yes: After Department preference; GC Parks& PW-011 Park Safety Checklist 10 years 10 years Mfr,pD, S/I QC&OD §34090 Landscape Public Works Department Preference /Maint./ Pesticide Use Permits& Mag' Yes: After (agricultural pesticide records Parks& PW 012 Applications 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD are required for 2 years); GC Landscape Ppr §34090; 3 CCR 6623 Public Works /Maint./ Mag' Yes: After Department preference; GC Parks& PW-013 Playground Inspections 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD §34090 Landscape RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 370 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-3 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Public Works /Maint./ Mag' Yes: Afte Department preference; GC Parks& PW-014 Sidewalk Complaints-Parks 10 years 10 years MfrP,pD, S/ I QC&OD §34090 Landscape Public Works Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, /Maint./ Yes: After PW-015 Tree Inventory Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I Data is interrelated; GC§34090 Parks& years years Ppr QC&OD Landscape Public Works /Maint./ Mag' Yes: After Department preference; GC Parks& PW-016 Tree Maintenance Work Orders 30 years 30 years Mfr. S/I QC&OD §34090 Landscape Data is interrelated; Databases Division Work Orders/Service Requests where sewer records may be PW-017 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Providing CMMS DATABASE(Computerized Yes: After stored are required for 5 years; Service/ Maintenance Management QC&OD SWRCB Order 2022-0103- Work System) years years DWQ; CCP W38 et seq., 340 et seq., 342, GC§34090 Work Orders/Service Requests- Providing All Information Entered in CMMS When No When No Mag, ng Yes: After Preliminary drafts(the database Service/ PW-018 Database Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD is the original); GC§34090 Work Required Required Ppr (Paper drafts) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 371 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-4 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Work Orders/Service Requests- City NOT entered in CMMS Database ; May contain Division (or partial information entered into sewer records,which are Mag, require d for 5 years: SWRCB Providing CMMS Database) Yes: After PW-019 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I Order 2022-0103-DWQ; CCP Service/ Ppr QC&OD §§338 et seq., 340 et seq., 342; Work (Division providing service retains �� originals; Division requesting Gro§§33S et seq., 340 et sew service is considered a copy) 342-, GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 372 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-5 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). MAINTENANCE /STREETS&FLEET Aboveground Diesel Storage Department Preference; EPA Public Works Tanks (Agency Owned) FAQs recommend Life of the Yes: After Maint./ Life of the Life of the Mag, Tank; applies to both Tier I and / Streets& PW-020 Spill Prevention Control and Tank Tank Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Tier II Tanks; (Tier II tanks are Fleets Countermeasures(SPCC), 20 years 20 years Ppr required to have an integrity test Inspections, Integrity Testing, every 20 years); GC§§34090, Maintenance, Repairs 60201 Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. PW-021 AQMD Permits(Fuel Usage) 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD 40 CFR 70.6; GC§34090 Ppr Public Works Department Preference (City /Maint./ Hazardous Waste Manifests/ Mag, Yes: After has"cradle to grave" liability); Streets& PW-022 Certificates of Disposal 5 years P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD 40 CFR 262.40, 8 CCR Fleets Ppr 3204(d)(1)(A), 22 CCR 66262.40 Operations& Maintenance Life of Facility Life of Mag, Yes: After Department Preference; GC Lead Dept. PW-023 Manuals(O&M Manuals) or Equipment Facility or Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD §34090 et. seq. Equipment Ppr Pre-Trip Inspections/DOT Program/CHP Inspections/ Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. PW-024 Vehicle Safety Checks/Daily 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§34090; 13 CCR 1234(c) Vehicle Inspections/Daily Ppr Equipment Checks RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 373 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-6 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Public Works /Maint./ Sidewalk Complaints- Right of Mag'Mfr, Yes: Afte Department preference; GC Streets& PW-025 Way 10 years 10 years P,pD, S/ I QC&OD §34090 Fleets Public Works Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, /Maint./ Yes: After PW-026 Sidewalk Inspection Database Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I Data is interrelated; GC§34090 Streets& years years Ppr QC&OD Fleets Stormwater: Operation& Department preference; plans Public Works must be updated every 5 years, Maintenance (Catch Basins, Field, Mag, /Maint./Streets& PW-027 General Cleaning, Open Channels, 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After audits are required every 2 QC&OD years; SWRCB Order 2006-03; Fleets Slots, Stormwater Treatment Ppr 40 CFR§§122.21, 122.41, Measures and Trash Cleaning) 122.44; GC§34090 Department Preference: entered into DlgAlert Software the Excavator, Operator and the Underground Service Alerts Mag' Yes: After Regional Notification Center has Lead Dept. PW-028 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I (USA's)/Dig Alerts Ppr QC&OD the obligation to retain the notice Rege+red for 3 years; GC §§4216.2(f) 4 ''a^�;3(d), GC §34090 Public Works Department Preference Underground Storage Tanks(City- Mag, Yes: After /Maint./ PW-029 Owned -Removed) 10 years P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD (required for the life of the tank); Streets& 23 CCR 2712(b), H&S Fleets Location, Soil Remediation Pprf §25284.2(i); GC§34090 et. seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 374 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-7 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Public Works Mag, 22 CCR 66266.130(c)(5), H&S /Maint./ PW-030 Used Oil Disposal 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/ I Yes: Afte §25250.18(b), 25250.19(a)(3)et Streets& P r QC&OD se Fleets p q' Department Preference; If a Vehicle&Equipment History Files motor carrier, required for 18 Public Works Disposal of Disposal of months after vehicle is sold; /Maint./ Vehicle or Vehicle or Mag' Yes: After CHP requires life of vehicle; PW-031 AQMD Certifications, Maintenance, Mfr, OD, S/I Streets& Registrations, Safety Certifications, Equipment+ Equipment+ Ppr QC&OD OSHA requires 1 year; 8 CCR§ Fleets 2 years 2 years 3203(b)(1); 49 CFR etc. 396.21(b)(1);49 CFR 396.3(c); CCP§337 et. Seq., GC§34090 Data is interrelated; Databases Division Work Orders/Service Requests where sewer records may be PW-032 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Providing CMMS DATABASE(Computerized Yes: After stored are required for 5 years; Service/ Maintenance Management QC&OD SWRCB Order 2022-0103- Work System) years years DWQ; CCP W38 et seq., 340 et seq., 342, GC§34090 Work Orders/Service Requests- Providing All Information Entered in CMMS When No When No Mag, ng Yes: After Preliminary drafts(the database Service/ PW-033 Database Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD is the original); GC§34090 Work Required Required Ppr (Paper drafts) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 375 Ver. 11.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: PUBLIC WORKS Page PW-8 (Maintenance / Facilities, Parks Landscape, Streets Fleet / Safety/ Admin) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged& S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims, public records act requests audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Work Orders/Service Requests- City NOT entered in CMMS Database ; May contain Division (or partial information entered into sewer records,which are Mag, require d for 5 years: SWRCB Providing CMMS Database) Yes: After PW-034 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I Order 2022-0103-DWQ; CCP Service/ Ppr QC&OD §§338 et seq., 340 et seq., 342; Work (Division providing service retains �� originals; Division requesting Gro§§33S et seq., 340 et sew service is considered a copy) -34-2, GC§34090 SAFETY/ADMINISTRATION Public Works Mag, Employee Training File(Training Separation + !�3 aration + Yes: After Department preference; GC /Safety PW-035 Mfr, OD, S/I Admin. Certificates) 3 years years Ppr QC&OD §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 376 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, complaints, claims,public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). RCMU -RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 9 Mag, Yes: Ser es RCMU-001 Applications for Service 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC OE) T RCMU Ppr &OD §34090 Mag, Yes: Lead Dept. RCMU-002 AQMD Permits (Generators, etc.) 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 40 CFR 70.6; GC§34090 Ppr &OD Engi;ee i Mag, Yes: Servoees4- RCMU-003 Armored Car Manifests 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§34090 RCMU Ppr &OD Bulk Power Log SheetsEngin /vc v eri=,� Purchasing/Suppliers Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC c^r,, RCMU-004 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S er QC/I Aft RCMU (Evaluations, Financial Data. Ppr &OD §34090 Reports or Studies) Capital Improvement Projects(CIP -RCMU): Administration File/ NOT Scanned (Electricity, Fiber or Street Lights Only) 10 years or Completion + Department preference; Some After 10 years or grant funding agencies require Project Administration, Certified FundingAfter Fundin audits; Statute of Limitations for � Mag, Yes: Errors&Omissions is 10 years; c^� .. RCMU-005 Payrolls, Community Outreach/ Upon Agency Agency Yes: Until Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Statute of Limitations: Contracts RCMU Notifications, Project Schedules, Completion Audit, if Audit, if Completed Ppr &OD &Spec's-4 years,Wrongful Progress meetings, Punch Lists, required, required, Real Estate Appraisals, RFIs& whichever is whichever is Death=comp. +5 years, Responses, Temporary longer longer Developers=comp. + 10 years; Easements, Construction CCP§337 et. seq., GC§34090 Manager's Logs, Daily Inspections, Daily Logs, etc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 377 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Capital Improvement Projects(CIP -RCMU): Permanent File/ Scanned Records(Electricity, Fiber or Street Lights Only Specifications/RFP&Addenda, Agreement/Contract(copy), Yes: €�+eeerieg Successful Proposal, Change Mag, After Department preference; SeFvmeesT Upon Yes: Until &ODD retained for disaster RCMU-006 Orders, Geotechnical Studies& Completion P P Completed Mfr, OD, S/I Complet. preparedness purposes; GC RCMU Reports, Operations& Ppr Maintenance Manuals(O&M eaF §34090 s Manuals,)Materials Testing Reports, Grading Permits, Hazardous Materials Plans, Notice of Completion, Photos, Soil Reports, Studies, Submittals, Surveys, etc. 9 Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Data Fields/Records are c������� � RCMU-007 Customer Information Service Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC interrelated; meets municipal RCMU (CIS) Database years years Ppr &OD government auditing standards; GC§34090 9 Department of Energy(DOE)& Mag, Yes: cvc v cG.. Federal Energy Regulatory Department Preference; GC RCMU-008 P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC RCMU Commission (FERC)Licenses and Ppr &OD §34090 Regulatory Correspondence 9 Department of Energy(DOE)& Mag, Yes: cerv'Gec ' RCMU-009 Federal Energy Regulatory P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC RCMU Commission (FERC) Reports Ppr &OD §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 378 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: City Clerk RCMU-010 Easements When No When No Mfr, OD, S/I After QC (copies); GC§34090.7 Longer Longer Ppr &OD Required Required ^^^^^r.-g Mag, Yes: Department Preference Engi ee ElectricityDrawings/As-Builts/ o�L RCMU-011 g P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC (Engineering has originals); GC RCMU Record Drawings Ppr &OD §34090.7 ^^^^^r.-g Equipment Records(Manuals, Disposal of Disposal of Mag, Yes: Engi ee Department Preference; CCP T p RCMU-012 Tests, Inspections, Studies, Equipment+ Equipment+ Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §337 et. Seq., GC§34090 RCMU Reports) 2 years 2 years Ppr &OD Engi eerimg Facility Histories/Infrastructure Mag, es: Department Preference; GC Servmoes4- RCMU-013 Design n P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 RCMU Ppr &OD Generator Operation Logs& Mag, Yes: Lead Dept. RCMU-014 Inspections- Fixed/Stationary 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC AQMD Rule 1470; GC§34090 Generators Ppr &OD Generator Operation Logs& Mag, Yes: AQMD Rule 1470; Form Lead Dept. RCMU-015 Inspections- Portable/ 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 400-E-13a instructions; GC Emergency Generators Ppr &OD §34090 T RCMU-016 Joint Pole Agreements, History, Mag, Yes*P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC RCMU Maintenance(Card Files) Ppr &OD §34090 �9 Joint Pole Invoices/Accounts Mag, Yes: Department Preference(meets Servmees4- RCMU-017 Receivable 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC municipal government auditing RCMU Ppr &OD requirements); GC§34090 Engineer*--- Mag, Yes: T RCMU-018 Load Records 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC RCMU Ppr &OD §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 379 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Engi eeF4g— , Yes: T Payments/Credit Card Receipts- Mag, Department preference(meets RCMU-019 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC RCMU RCMU Ppr &OD auditing standards); GC§34090 � Power Operations Reports/ Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC RCMU-020 Outage Reports 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC RCMU p Ppr &OD §34090 Engineerimg Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Se�T RCMU-021 Power Outage Report Database Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Data is interrelated; GC§34090 RCMU years ears Ppr &OD Engineering Mag, Yes: Department Preference Power Trading/Power Scheduling Completion + Completion + SeFVi�- RCMU-022 g p 2 years p Mfr, OD, S/I After QC (auditing standards are 5 RCMU (Check Out Worksheets) 3 years 5 years Ppr &OD years); GC§34090 Power Trading/Power Scheduling Mag, es: Department Preference; GC RCMU-023 3 years 4 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC RCMU (Confirmations, Invoices) Ppr &OD §34090 �- Power Trading/Power Scheduling Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC RCMU-024 (Pathing Sheets) 3 years 4 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §34090 RCMU Ppr &OD E^~i��-eFimg Regulatory Agency Audits: CEC, Mag, Yes: -��' Department Preference; GC T Serviee6 RCMU-025 CFTC, CPUC, EPA, FERC, NERC, 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC p RCMU &Gas NPDES, WECC, etc. Ppr &OD §34090 Engineer'„- Regulatory Agency Compliance Reports&Confirmations: , Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC RCMU-026 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC RCMU &Gas CPUC, EPA, FERC, NERC, Ppr &OD §34090 NPDES, WECC, etc. Engineering Regulatory Agency SP.Pf "g RCMU-027 Correspondence: , CPUC, EPA, Minimum 10 Minimum 10 Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC A ARMfr, OD, S/I After QC RCMU &Gas FERC, NERC, NPDES, WECC, years years Ppr &OD §34090 etc.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 380 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). EngineeF g- Regulatory Agency Inspections: , Mag, Yes: Sew ees RCMU-028 CPUC, EPA, FERC, NERC, 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC T RCMU &Gas NPDES, WECC, etc. Ppr &OD §34090 €ng+aeer+ng Regulatory Agency Licenses: Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC T Sewmoes RCMU-029 CPUC, EPA, FERC, NERC, P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC p RCMU &Gas NPDES, WECC, etc. Ppr &OD §34090 Data is interrelated; Databases €ng+aeeri SCADA Database (Electricity) Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: where sewer records may be SewmGesT RCMU-030 (Supervisory Control and Data Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC stored are required for 5 years; RCMU Acquisition) years years Ppr &OD SWRCB Order 2022-0103- DWQ; GC§§34090, 12168.7 Data is interrelated; Databases where sewer records may be Eng:^eeri g When No When No Mag, Yes: stored are required for 5 years; RCMU-031 SCADA Printouts/Reports/Log Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC SWRCB Order 2022-0103- RCMU Books Required Required Ppr &OD DWQ; Preliminary drafts if net §§34090,12 668.7 -- Solar Power Production Operating Mag, es: De artment Preference; GC T Data Lo SeFvmoe� RCMU-032 p g 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC p RCMU gs/Diaries Ppr &OD §34090 Underground Service Alerts Mag, Yes: Department Preference Lead Dept. RCMU-033 (USA's) 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/ I After QC (required for 3 years); GC Ppr &OD §§4216.2(d)&4216.3(d), 34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 381 Ver. 25.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: RCMU Page RCMU-6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, complaint , claims,public records act request , audits and/or investigation suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Data is interrelated; Databases Division Work Orders/Service Requests where sewer records may be RCMU-034 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/ I fter QC Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Providing CMMS DATABASE stored are required for 5 years; A Service/ (Computerized Maintenance years years Ppr &OD SWRCB Order 2022-0103- Work Management System) DWQ; CCP W38 et seq., 340 et seq., 342, GC§34090 Division Work Orders/Service Requests- When No When No Mag, Yes: RCMU-035 Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Providing All Information Entered in CMMS Preliminary drafts(the database Service/ Database is the original); GC§34090 Work (Paper drafts) Required Required Ppr &OD Work Orders/Service Requests- Gity PFef,,.ene May contain NOT entered in CMMS Database Division (or partial information entered into sewer records,which are Providing CMMS Database) Mag, Yes: required for 5 years; SWRCB Service/ RCMU-036 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Order 2022-0103-DWQ: CCP W Ppr &OD §§338 et seq., 340 et seq., 342; Work (Division providing service retains originals; Division requesting service is considered a copy) �4�GC§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 382 RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ADOPTING REVISED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES, AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS, AND RESCINDING PREVIOUS RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES WHEREAS, the objective of a records management program and retention schedule is to control costs, increase space availability, streamline information and consistent record keeping systems, and improve productivity by providing records and information in a timely manner to individuals requiring them; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13868 and Government Code Section 60200 provide that the legislative body of a fire protection district may authorize at any time the destruction or disposition of any duplicate record, paper, or document, the original or a permanent photographic record of which is in the files of any officer or department of the district; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 60201 provides that District records which have served their purpose, which are not expressly required by law to be filed and preserved, and which will not adversely affect any interest of the district or public may be destroyed; WHEREAS, the District has a procedure to maintain a list of the types of records destroyed or disposed of that reasonably identifies the information contained in the records in each category; WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed and approves the Records Retention Schedule as evidenced by his signature on this Resolution, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 60201; and WHEREAS, the District previously adopted Resolution No. 2024-007 adopting records retention schedules. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above in this resolution, are true and correct. Section 2. Resolution No. FD2024-007 and all previous resolutions adopting District records retention schedules are hereby rescinded and replaced with the Fire District Records Retention Schedules adopted herein. Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby adopts as its District Records Retention Schedules, the District Records Retention Schedules set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The Board of Directors hereby finds that the destruction or disposition of records in Exhibit A that have exceeded the retention periods set forth therein, and are no longer required for any District purpose, will not adversely affect any interest of the District or the public. Resolution No. FD 2025-020 - Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 383 Section 4. The records of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, as set forth in the Fire District Records Retention Schedules, Exhibit A, and that are no longer required for any District purpose, are hereby authorized to be destroyed as provided by California Health & Safety Code Section 13868, and Government Code Section 60200, et seq., and in accordance with the provisions of said Schedule and District policies and procedures, without further action by the District's Board of Directors. Section 5. Minor updates are hereby authorized to be made to the Records Retention Schedules, without any further action by the District's Board of Directors, that do not alter the retention period or delete records specified in the schedule, with the consent of the City Clerk Services Director, City Attorney and City Manager. Minor updates are defined as improvement in Records Descriptions, changes in Office of Record / Inactive timeframes (but not the Total Retention Period), whether to Image a record, and the Justification. Section 5. The term "records" as used herein shall include records, documents, instructions, books, microforms, electronic files, magnetic tape, optical media, instruments, writings, and/or paper regardless of media, as defined by the California Public Records Act and as those terms are used in Health & Safety Code Section 13868 and Government Code Section 60200, et seq. Section 6. The Clerk of the Board of Directors shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. Section 7. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. Resolution No. FD 2025-020 - Page 2 of 3 Page 384 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2025. L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Kim Sevy, Clerk I, Kim Sevy, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the 20th day of August 2025. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Executed this 2111 day of August 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Kim Sevy, Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon Resolution No. FD 2025-020 - Page 3 of 3 Page 385 HOW TO USE RETENTION SCHEDULES ©1995-2025 Gladwell Governmental Services,Inc.(909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission A legend explaining the information presented in the retention schedule; please read this for an explanation of every column. The specified retention period applies regardless of the media of the record: If a record is stored on paper and electronic format (a computer file on a hard drive), all electronic and paper records should be destroyed (or deleted / erased) after the specified period of time has elapsed and authorization to destroy has been obtained. Copies or duplicates of records should never be retained longer than the prescribed period for the official (original) record, and drafts and copies should be destroyed as soon as they are no longer required. The term "records" shall include all records as defined by the California Public Records Act. STRUCTURE: CITY-WIDE. DEPARTMENTS & DIVISIONS The City-wide retention schedule includes those records all departments have in common (e-mails, letters, memorandums, purchase orders, etc.). These records are NOT repeated in the Department retention schedule, unless that department is the Office of Record. Each department has a separate retention schedule that describes the records that are unique to their department, or for which they are the Office of Record. The department retention schedules may be organized by Division within that Department. If a record is not listed in your department retention schedule, refer to the City-wide retention schedule, or look in the index to the schedules (provided after approval.) BENEFITS This retention schedule has been developed by Diane R. Gladwell, MMC, an expert in Municipal Government records, and will provide the City with the following benefits: • Reduce administrative expenses, expedite procedures • Free office space and computer storage space • Reduce the cost of records storage— paper and electronic • Eliminate duplication of effort within the City • Find records faster • Determine what media should be used to store records AUTHORIZATION TO DESTROY RECORDS (Paper or Electronic Records); Destruction or deletion of an official (ori inal) record that has exceeded its retention period must be authorized prior to destruction or deletion. • If there is a minimum retention ("Minimum 2 years"), the destruction/deletion must be authorized before it is destroyed, as it is an official (original) record. Copies, drafts, notes and non-records do NOT require authorization, and can be destroyed "When No Longer Required." • If there is NOT a minimum retention ("When No Longer Required"), it does NOT need to be authorized prior to destruction, as it is a preliminary draft, copy, or the Content is NOT Substantive. On every page of the schedules (near the top,just under the column headings) are important instructions, including instructions regarding holds on destroying records. "Litigation, complaints, claims, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods (retention resumes after settlement or resolution)." Page 386 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE LEGEND ©1995—2025 Gladwell Governmental Services,Inc.(909)337-3516-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission OFR(Office of Record): The department that keeps the Official (original or"record copy") record for its retention period, then authorizes destruction. Usually, it is the department that originates the record. The official (original) record may be the paper/ hard copy version of the record; however the electronic record may be the official (original) record. See the "Destroy Paper after Imaged &QC'd" below for the Legal Requirements for the electronic record to be the official (original) record. Records Description: The record series (a group of like records). Non-Record: Documents, studies, books and pamphlets produced by outside agencies, preliminary drafts not retained in the ordinary course of business. Retention/Disposition: Active (guideline): How long the file remains in the immediate office area Inactive (guideline): How long the file is in off-site storage, stored electronically in accordance with law (see below) Total Retention: The total number of years the record is retained For file folders containing documents with different retention timeframes, use the document with the longest retention time. P = Permanent indefinite = No fixed or specified retention period; used for databases, because the data fields are interrelated and certain data may require minimum retention. Vital? = Those records that are needed for basic operations in the event of a disaster. Media Options (guideline)terms used in State law: Mag = Electronic Computer Magnetic Media (Hard drives, Networks, USB Drives, Cloud, etc.) Mfr= Microforms (aperture cards, microfilm, microfiche, or jackets) Ppr= Paper OD = Optical Disk or other Unalterable Media which does not allow changes Scan /Import (guideline): "S" indicates the record should be scanned into the document imaging system; "I" indicates the record should be electronically imported into the document imaging system; "M" indicates the record was microfilmed Destroy Paper after Imaged &QC'd (quality checked) /Trustworthy Electronic Record: "Yes" means the electronic record may serve as the OFFICIAL record (and the paper version may be destroyed, or the record may be electronically generated and never exist in paper format) IF (these are the legal requirements for the electronic record to serve as the official (original) record) the electronic record is also placed on Unalterable Media, Immutable Cloud Media, Optical Disk (OD), DVD-R, CD-R, Blue-ray-R, or WORM, or microfilmed)which is stored in a safe &separate location. Employees are required to Quality Check ("QC'd") both the images and the indexes, and ensure the electronic record contains all significant details from the original and be an adequate substitute for the original document for all purposes; other legal mandates may apply. Legend for legal citations (§: Section) B&P: Business&Professions Code(CA) CBC: California Building Code CC: Civil Code(CA) CCP: Code of Civil Procedure(CA) CCR: California Code of Regulations(CA) CFC: California Fire Code CFR: Code of Federal Regulations(US) EC: Elections Code(CA) EVC: Evidence Code(CA) FA: Food &Agriculture Code FC: Family Code(CA) FTB: Franchise Tax Board (CA) GC: Government Code(CA) H&S: Health&Safety Code(CA) HUD: Housing & Urban Develop. (US) LC: Labor Code (CA) Ops. Cal.Atty. Gen..: Attorney General Opinions (CA) PC: Penal Code (CA) PRC Public Resources Code R&T: Revenue&Taxation Code (CA) UFC: Uniform Fire Code USC: United States Code(US) VC: Vehicle Code(CA) W&I: Welfare& Institutions Code (CA) Page 387 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-1 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Accident, Incident, Injury CITY-WIDE Used b ALL Departments Human Copies- Copies- reports: PUBLIC& Mag, Resources/ When No When No Yes: After Copies retained for reference; Risk CW-001 EMPLOYEES,with associated Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Management MSDS, if a chemical was Required Required Ppr involved Accounts Payable, Invoices, Petty Cash, Warrant Requests, Copies- Copies- Mag, All originals go to Finance Mfr, OD, S/I etc. When No When No Yes: Before Yes: After Finance CW-002 Longer Longer Payment QC&OD (these are copies); GC ALL backup is forwarded to Required Required Ppr §§34090.7, 60200 Finance Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-002.1 Administrative Hearings 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090 Ppr Brown Act challenges must be Affidavits of Publications/ filed within 30 or 90 days of Lead Dept. CW-003 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I Public Hearing Notices/Legal Mag' Yes: After action; Statute of Limitations Advertising/Affidavits of p P r QC&OD on Municipal Government Posting actions is 3-6 months; GC §§34090, 54960.1(c)(1) Copies- Copies- Agenda Packets/Staff When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After City Clerk CW-004 Reports: City Council Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required Copies- Copies- r es. r,iiei Agreements&Contracts ALL When No When No Mag, QC&OD Ensure the City Clerk receives City Clerk CW-005 Mfr, OD, S/I lien— all original agreements; GC ORIGINALS Longer Longer Required Required Ppr 6e4etie §§34090.7, 60200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 388 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-2 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Some Grants require audits; Grants covered by a Agreements&Contracts: Consolidated Action Plan are ADMINISTRATIVE FILES 10 years or Completion + required for 5 years; Uniform After Admin. Requirements for (with Grant Funding) 10 years or Yes: After Lead Dept. Funding After Funding Mag, QC&OD Grants to Local Governments (Managing the Agency Yes: Before is 3 years from expenditure Ppr Agreement/ CW-006 (Correspondence, Insurance Completion Audit, if Agency Audit, Completion Mfr, OD, S/I report or final payment of Contract Certificates, Project Administration, Project required, if required, grantee or subgrantee; 2 CFR Schedules, Certified Payrolls, whichever i a whichever is s longer 200.334; 24 CFR 91.105(h), longer 92.505, 570.490, &570.502(a), Invoices, Logs, RFP, etc.) 29 CFR 97.42;-OMB Circular A-110&A-133; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq.; GC§8546.7 Covers E&O Statute of Limitations(insurance Agreements&Contracts: certificates are filed with Lead Dept. ADMINISTRATIVE FILES Yes: After agreement); Published Audit (Managing the Completion + Yes: Before Mag, QC&OD Standards=4-7 years; Statute Agreement CW-007 (Correspondence, Project Completion 10 years 10 years Completion Mfr, OD, S/I of Limitations: Contracts& / Contract) Administration, Project Ppr Gemp4et+e Spec's=4 years, Wrongful Schedules, Certified Payrolls, R Death=comp. +5 years, Invoices, Logs, RFP, etc.) Developers=comp. + 10 years; CCP§337 et. seq., GC §34090, 60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 389 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-3 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Agreements&Contracts: UNSUCCESSFUL BIDS, Lead Dept. UNSUCCESSFUL (Managing the PROPOSALS or RESPONSES r, O CW-008 Yes: After 2 years 2 years Mf OD, S/I GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Agreement/ to RFPs (Request for Ppr QC&OD Contract) Proposals)and/or RFQs (Request for Qualifications) that don't result in a contract Copies- Copies- Audits/Audit Reports/Annual When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Finance CW-009 Financial Reports Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD Copies; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required CW-010 Bids: See Agreements& Contracts Department Staff Meetings Mag'(all Records, including Yes: After GC§§34090 et seq., 60201 et Staffing Dept. CW-011 Minutes and Recordings, 2 Years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD seq. Department Awards) Ppr Boards, Commissions, & Committees: External When No When No Mag, Organizations Yes: After CW-012 Longer Longer Mfr, OD. S/I QC&OD Non-records (e.g. County Board of Required Required Ppr Supervisors) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 390 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-4 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Brown Act challenges must be Advisory Bodies Formed by Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After filed within 30 or 90 days of Staffing Dept. CW-013 CITY COUNCIL years years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD action; GC§§34090, AGENDAS,AGENDA Ppr 54960.1(c)(1) PACKETS Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Department preference; State Staffing Dept. CW-014 Advisory Bodies Formed by 2 years 2 years Mag law only requires for 30 days; CITY COUNCIL 99 AUDIO RECORDINGS of GC§54953.5(b) Meetings/Audio Tapes Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Department Preference;Video Advisory Bodies Formed by Minimum 3 Minimum 3 Mag recording of meetings are only Staffing Dept. CW-015 CITY COUNCIL years years gg required for 90 days if audio or VIDEO RECORDINGS of another record is made; GC Meetings/Audio Tapes §§34090.7, 34090 Boards, Commissions, & Committees: Residents Mag, Yes: After Staffing Dept. CW-016 Advisory Bodies Formed by P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. CITY COUNCIL Ppr No MINUTES&BYLAWS Copies- Copies- Yes: Mag, Yes: After Final must be filed with County Finance CW-017 Budgets- Finals When No When No Current Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD&Auditor; GC§§34090.7, 60200, Longer Longer Fiscal Year Ppr years 40802, 53901 Required Required RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 391 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-5 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Cash Receipts Detail/Backup Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, Finance CW-018 /Accounts Receivable Detail/ Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Yes: After GC§§34090.7, 60200 Refund Detail Required Required Ppr Lead Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After City preference; GC§§34090, (Requesting) CW-019 City Attorney Opinions years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD 60201 et seq. Dept. Ppr Copies- Copies- Human When No When No Yes: After Yes: Before Mag, Resources/ Longer Longer QC&OD CW-020 Claims Final Mfr, OD, S/I GC§§34090.7, 34090.E Risk Required Required €nal Management (Final (Final Disposition Ppr ion Disposition) Disposition) City preference; Statute of Limitations for personal Lead ,Mag property,fraud, etc. is 3 years; Complaints/Concerns from Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: After (Responding) CW-021 Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Claims must be filed within 6 Dept. Citizens years years Ppr months; CCP§340 et seq., 342, GC§§911.2, 34090, 60201 et seq. Send to Send to Mag, Human Yes: After Resources CW-022 Complaints Against Employees Human Human Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Resources Resources Ppr CW-023 Contracts: See Agreements Copies- Copies- Copies or duplicates of any When No When No Mag'Mfr, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-024 record Longer Longer P,pr S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Required Required RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 392 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-6 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Correspondence- ROUTINE (IF CONTENT relates in a SUBSTANTIVE way to the conduct of the public's Dept. that business) Authors Only if content relates in a substantive way to the conduct Document (e.g.Administrative Files, Mag, Yes: After of thepublic's business; City of or CW-025 Ghrenolegmeal _ilex e-mail/ 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD San Jose v. Superior Court Receives the email with SUBSTANTIVE Ppr (2017)2 Cal.5th 608; GC City's Original content, General Files, Letters, §§34090, 60201 Document Memorandums, Miscellaneous Reports, Press Releases, Public Records Requests, Reading Files,We*iRg Files, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 393 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-7 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Correspondence- TRANSITORY/ Electronic and paper records PRELIMINARY DRAFTS, are categorized,filed and Interagency and Intraagency retained based upon the Memoranda NOT retained in CONTENT of the record. the ordinary course of business Records where either the Content relates in a Content NOT Substantive, or SUBSTANTIVE way to the NOT made or retained for the conduct of the public's purpose of preserving the informational content for future business, or ARE made or Dept. that retained for the purpose of Authors reference preserving the informational Document When No When No content for future reference or CW-026 (e.g. calendars, checklists, e- Lon Longer Mag, mail/email e� Longer social media g g Ppr are SAVED by placing them Receives the Required Required in an electronic or paper City's Original posting, flyers, invitations, (project)file folder and Document instant messaging, inventories, logs, mailing lists, meeting retained for the applicable room registrations, speaker retention period. If not cards, staff videoconference mentioned here, consult the chats, notes and recordings, City Attorney to determine if a supply inventories,telephone record is considered transitory messages,text messages, /preliminary draft. GC transmittal letters,thank yous, §§34090,-64 Ops. Cal.Atty. requests from other cities, Gen. 317 (1981));City of San undeliverable envelopes/ Jose v. Superior Court(2017) returned mail,visitors logs, 2 Cal.5th 608 voice mails,webpages, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 394 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-8 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Deeds, Easements, Final Copies- Copies- Orders of Condemnations, When No When No r, OD, Yes: After Send all originals to the City City Clerk CW-027 Liens, Recorded Documents, Longer Longer Ppr S/ I QC&OD Clerk; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Rights of Ways(All) Required Required Deposit Accounts/Trust Close+ 5 Close+ 5 Yes: After Mag, Department preference; meets Lead Dept. CW-028 Accounts/Refundable Mfr, OD, all auditing standards; GC Deposits years years Ppr QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Transitory or source records not retained in the ordinary 2 years After 2 years After Mag, course of business; CHIP Lead Dept. CW-029 DMV Pull Notices Superseded or Superseded Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After audits every 2 years; Bureau of Separated or Separated Ppr QC&OD National Affairs recommends 2 years for all supplementary Personnel records; GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. As long as the drafts and notes When No When No Mag, are not retained in the"Regular Drafts&Notes: Drafts that are Yes: After Course of Business". Consult Lead Dept. CW-030 revised (retain final version) Longer Longer Mfr, OD, all Required Required Ppr QC&OD the City Attorney to determine if a record is considered a draft. GC§§34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 395 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-9 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). The Lead Department should print out historical documents (or save source data)prior to GIS Database/Data/Layers When No When No Mag, Yes: After replacing the data, if they Lead Dept. CW-031 (both City-wide and Longer Longer Yes Mfr, OD, S/I require the data or output for Specialized) Required Required Ppr historical&OD historical purposes; Department Preference (Preliminary documents); GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. et seq. Lead Dept. Grants (UNSUCCESSFUL Mag' Yes: After (Managing the CW-032 Applications, Correspondence) 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Grant) Ppr Grants/CDBG/Reimbursable Meets auditing standards; Claims/FEMA Claims/OES Grants covered by a Claims(SUCCESSFUL Consolidated Action Plan are Reports, other records required After required for 5 years; Uniform to pass the funding agency's Funding After Funding Admin. Requirements for Lead Dept. audit, if required) Agency Agency Audit, Mag, Grants to Local Governments(Managing the CW-033 2 years Audit, if if required- Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After is 3 years from expenditure Grant) Applications (successful), grant Required - Minimum 5 Ppr QC&OD report or final payment of agreement, program rules, Minimum 5 years grantee or subgrantee; 2 CFR regulations&procedures, 200.334; 24 CFR 91.105(h), reports to grant funding years 92.505, 570.490, &570.502(a), agencies, correspondence, 29 CFR 97.42; OMB Circular A- audit records, completion 110&A-133; GC§§34090, records 60201 et seq.; GC§8546.7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 396 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-10 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Send all grievances to Human Copies- Copies- Resources; All State and Human Grievances and Informal When No When No Yes: Before Mag, Yes: After Federal laws require retention CW-034 Mfr, OD, S/I until final disposition of formal Resources Complaints (Employees) Longer Longer Disposition Ppr QC&OD complaint; State requires 2 Required Required years after action is taken; GC §§12946, 12960, 34090 Litigation Files/Lawsuits/ Court Case Files Final Final Yes: Until Yes: After Mag, Department preference; CCP Lead Dept. CW-035 Resolution + 5 Resolution + 5 Settlement Mfr, OD, S/I §§337 et seq.; GC§§911.2, Send Final Settlement years years Ppr QC&OD 34090, 34090.6 Agreements to the City Clerk Wh n N Wh r N i „ o ci•ns i Tirv,o Off �-.-r,e,-,-.e Yes: ns+,,. ain L , Dpr GW 036 �s Meager Longer — M#� 9B S�4 T�� Required RequiFed P-Pf QS&QQ et-& c- Previous MSDS may be obtained from a service; MSDS may be destroyed as long as a Material Safety Data Sheet record of the chemical/ (MSDS)/Safety Data Sheet substance/agent,where& (SDS) Chemical Use Report While Mag, Yes-After when it was used is maintained Lead Dept. CW-037 Form (or records of the Chemical In 30 years 30 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD for 30 years;Applies to chemical/substance/agent, Use Ppr qualified employers; Claims where&when it was used) can be made for 30 years for toxic substance exposures; 8 CCR 3204(d)(1)(B)(2 and 3), 29 CFR 1910.1020(d)(1)(1), GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 397 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-11 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: After.Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-038 Minutes-City Council When No When NoLonger Longer Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Required Required Ppr Ale §§34090.7, 60200 Copies- Copies- Return any whole unused Municipal Code(these are When No When No Yes: Mag, Yes: After codes to the City Clerk; City Clerk CW-039 copies) Longer Longer Current Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Originals maintained by City Required Required Original Ppr No Clerk Permanently; GC §§34090, 60201 et seq. When No When No Mag, Yes: After Non-records-may be obtained Lead Dept. CW-040 Newspaper Clippings Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I from the newspaper company; Required Required Ppr QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Notices: Public Hearing Mag, Statute of Limitations on Staffing Dept. CW-041 Notices and Proofs of 2 years 2 years Mfr. OD, all Yes: After Municipal Government actions Publications Ppr QC&OD is 3-6 months; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, Yes: After.Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-042 Ordinances -City Council Longer Longer Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Required Required Ppr NO §§34090, 60201 et seq. Human Send to Send to Mag, Resources/ Yes: After Risk CW-043 OSHA Inspections or Citations Human Human Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 Management Resources Resources Ppr Ensure records kept in Human Personnel Files (Department- Do Not Retain Do Not Retain Before Mag' Yes: After Department files comply with Resources CW-044 level Files) in in Separation Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD City policy(all originals are Departments Departments Ppr sent to Human Resources); GC§§34090.7, 60200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 398 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-12 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Shred After Shred After Notes maintained in a separate Incorporation Incorporation folder to be incorporated intonto into Before Mag,i Personnel Files(Supervisor's Yes: After performance evaluation, or to Lead Dept. CW-045 Notes) Performance Performance Annual Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD document progressive Evaluation or Evaluation or Evaluation Ppr Documented Documented discipline; GC§§34090 et seq., Discipline Discipline 60201 et seq. Preliminary Drafts; (retention is When No When No Mag, placed on the record the Lead Dept. CW-046 Unused Photographs Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I Yes: After photograph is used in- Required Required Ppr QC&OD Brochure, Report, etc.); destroy unnecessary photographs. GC§§34090 Public Relations/Press Mag' Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-047 Releases 2 years 2 years Mfr,pOD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Mag, Yes: After Department preference; GC Lead Dept. CW-048 Purchase Orders/Requisitions 2 years 3 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. Ppr Lead Dept. Real Estate Appraisal Reports: Mag, Yes: After Not accessible to the public; (Who Ordered CW-049 Property NOT purchased, 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/ 1 QC&OD GC§§34090, 60201 7928.705 the Appraisal) Loans not funded, etc. Ppr Not accessible to the public Lead Dept. Real Estate Appraisal Reports: Mag, until purchase has been Minimum 3 Minimum 5 Yes: After completed; meets municipal (Who Ordered CW-050 Purchased Property, Funded 2 years years years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD government auditing the Appraisal) Loans Ppr standards; GC§§34090, 60201 7928.705 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 399 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-13 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Records Destruction Lists/ Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, City Clerk CW-051 Certificate of Records Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/ I QC&OD Yes: After GC§§34090.7, 60200 Destruction Required Required Ppr Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule.)Standard Operating When No When No Mag, Procedures(SOPs), Studies or Yes: After CW-052 Reports(if not provided in the Longer Longer Mfr. OD, S/I QC&OD Non-Records schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Required Required Ppr Produced by OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS (League of California Cities, Chamber of Commerce, etc.) Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule. Mfr, OD, S/ I Standard Operating Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Lead Dept. CW-053 Yes: After Department preference; GC Procedures(SOPs), Studies or years years Ppr QC&OD §34090 Reports(if not provided in the schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Produced by YOUR Department RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 400 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-14 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Reference Materials: Policies, Procedures, Handbooks, Brochures, Flyers, Manuals, Plans(if not provided in the schedule.)Standard Operating When When Mag' Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-054 Mfr, OD, S/I Copies; GC§§34090.7, 60200 Procedures(SOPs), Studies or Superseded Superseded Ppr QC&OD Reports (if not provided in the schedule.) Newsletters, etc.: Produced by OTHER Departments CW-055 Reference or Working Files: See Correspondence Administratively and Reports and Studies Mag, Yes: After Historically significant, Lead Dept. CW-056 (Historically significant-e.g., 10 years P P Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD therefore retained Zoning Studies) Ppr 10 years permanently; GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. Reports and Studies (other Mag, Yes: After Department preference; Lead Dept. CW-057 than Historically significant 10 years 10 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Information is outdated after 10 fepefts-e.g.Annual Reports) Ppr years; GC§34090 Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: After Originals maintained by City City Clerk CW-058 Resolutions-City Council When No When No Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD Clerk Permanently; GC Longer Longer Ppr Ne §§34090.7, 60200 Required Required Special Projects/Subject Files Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' Yes: After Department Preference; GC Lead Dept. CW-059 I Issue Files years years Mfrr,,pOD, S/I QC&OD §§34090, 60201 et seq. et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 401 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-15 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Surveys/Questionnaires(that the City issues) If a summary of the data is Mag, Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-060 compiled,the survey forms are 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. considered a draft or transitory Ppr QC&OD record, and can be destroyed as drafts (When No Longer Required) Time Cards/Time Sheets Copies- Copies- Mag, Finance/ When No When No Yes: After Payroll CW-061 (Finance keeps the originals Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD GC§§34090.7, 60200 et seq. with employee signatures) Required Required Ppr 2 years 2 nears Salaried employees do not Time Off Requests/Leave �^� When Mag• have timecards;Rre4+a�+aar q Yes: After Lead Dept. CW-062 Slips/Time Off Requests Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I drafts(the tame Gard ;s the+;.,.,l Required d Ppr QC&OD Feeerd); GC§§34090, 60201 et seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 402 Ver. 16.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE: CITY-WIDE STANDARDS Page CW-16 (Used by ALL Departments) Office of Retention No. Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments I Reference Record Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan QC'd? Retentions apply to the department that is NOT the Office of Record(OFR), or the "Lead Department" If you are the OFR, refer to your department retention schedule. Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, audits, public records act requests, and/or investi ations suspend normal retention eriods retention resumes after settlement or completion). Department preference; Ethics, Harassment&Workplace Violence Training is 5 years; Training Presented by City Calif. Labor Division is required Staff-ALL COURSE to keep their OSHA records 7 RECORDS years; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA Yes: After (Age)requires 3 years for Lead Dept. CW-063 2 years 5 years 7 years Mf O (Attendance Rosters or sign-in r, OD, S/I QC&OD promotion, demotion,transfer, sheets, Outlines and Materials; Where selection, or discharge; State includes Ethics, Harassment Ppr +aaet+ve Law requires 4 years for Prevention, Workplace personnel actions; 8 CCR Violence &Safety Training& §3203 et seq., 29 CFR Tailgates) 1627.3(b)(4), LC§6429(c); GC§§12946, 12960, 34090, 53235.2(b), 53237.2(b); LC §6401.9(f), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©1995-2017 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc.-all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission from GGS(909)337-3516 Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 403 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-1 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention begins after settlement). FIRE/ADMINISTRATION Human FR-001 Career File: Equipment Shred Upon Shred Upon Mag, Yes:Separation Separation Mfr, OD, S/I After QC City/District Preference (copies); Resources Assignments (Turnouts, etc.) or Transfer or Transfer Ppr &OD GC§60200 Copies- Copies- Billings- Fire Alarm Permits, Fire When No When No Mag, Yes: Finance FR-002 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Finance keeps originals; GC§ Inspections, Fire Permits Longer Longer Ppr &OD §60201 60201 Required Required Fire District Board Agendas,Audio Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: When No When No City Clerk keeps originals; GC§ City Clerk FR-003 or Video Recordings, Minutes, Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Resolutions, Notices Longer Longer Ppr &OD §60201 60201 Required Required Fire/ Mag' Yes:After Department Preference(rated Admin. FR-004 ISO Insurance Ratings 15 years 15 years Mfr, OD, S/I QC&OD every 10 years); GC§60201 Fire/ Monthly Statistical Reports/Run When No When No Mag, Yes: Considered a preliminary draft/ Admin. FR-005 Statistics Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC copy(the Fire database is the Required Required Ppr &OD original); GC§60201 et seq. Copies- Copies- Mag, Yes: Originals Maintained by City Clerk Mutual Aid Agreements, Joint When No When No City Clerk FR-006 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC or County Clerk of the Board Power Authorities Longer Longer Required Required Ppr &OD Permanently; GC§60201.7 Fire/ Programs and Projects (e.g. Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC§ FR-007 Explorer, CPR Program, Fire Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Admin. Service Day, etc.) years years Ppr &OD 60201 et seq. Fire/ Requests for Fire Incident Reports Mag, Yes: FR-008 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§60201 Admin. and Fire Investigation Reports Ppr & OD RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 404 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-2 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Fire/ Mag, Yes: Admin. FR-009 Ride-A-Long Waivers 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§60201 Ppr &OD Fire/ Standard Operating Procedures/ Superseded Superseded Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Admin. FR-010 Policy& Procedure Manual +2 years +2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §60201 Ppr &OD Fire/ Subpoenas(Personal Appearance- Mag, Yes: Admin. FR-011 Fire Personnel) 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§60201 Ppr &OD Data is interrelated; Meets Fire/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: municipal government auditing Admin. FR-012 Telestaff Database Minimum 7 Minimum 7 Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC standards; May include Employee years years Ppr &OD Reimbursement; GC §60201(d)(12) Department preference; Ethics Training is 5 years; Calif. Labor Division is required to keep their OSHA records 7 years; Training Course Records/EMS Yes: EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age)requires Fire/ Continuing Education Training Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, After QC 3 years for promotion, demotion, Admin. FR-013 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I &OD transfer, selection, or discharge; (Attendance Rosters, Outlines and years years Ppr `^'p State Law requires 2-3 years for Materials) inaotove personnel actions; 8 CCR§3203 et seq., 29 CFR 1627.3(b)(1), LC §6429(c); GC§§12946, 60201, 53235.2(b), 53237.2(b) Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Fire/ Training Database/Log (Target Data is interrelated; GC§60201 et FR-014 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Admin. Solutions/Vector Solutions) years ears Ppr &OD seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 405 ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-3 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement). Underground Storage Tanks-ALL- MagYes: Department Preference(required FR-015 10 years P P Mfr, O Fire/ City or Privately owned) , O After QC for the life of the tank); 23 CCR D, S/I Admin. Location, Soil Remediation, P r &OD� 2712(b), H&S §25284.2(i); GC MonitoringWell Records p year §60201 et. seq. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 406 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-4 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention begins after settlement). FIRE/COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Fire/ Mag, Yes: Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Community FR-016 Community Outreach Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Affairs years years Ppr &OD §60201 Fire/ ,Mag Yes: Public Information/Education Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Community FR-017 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Affairs (when produced internally) years years Ppr &OD §60201 Consistent with employee personnel files(Courts treat volunteers as employees); Volunteer Applications& Mag, Yes: EEOC/FLSA/ADEA(Age)requires Lead Dept. FR-018 Agreements-Unsuccessful 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 3 years for promotion, demotion, Ppr &OD transfer, selection, or discharge; 29 CFR 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), 8 CCR§3204(d)(1)et seq., GC §§12960, 60201 Courts treat volunteers as employees; EEOC/FLSA/ADEA Volunteer Applications& Yes: (Age)requires 3 years for Agreements (includes emergency Inactive/ Inactive/ Mag, After QC promotion, demotion,transfer, Lead Dept. FR-019 contact information) -Successful Separation + Separation + Mfr, OD, S/I &OD 4- selection, or discharge; State Law 3 years 3 years Ppr requires 2-3 years; 29 CFR Applicants yeaf 1602.31 & 1627.3(b)(1), 8 CCR §3204(d)(1)et seq., GC§§12960, 60201; 29 USC 1113 Fire/ Volunteer Historical Lists/ Mag, Yes: Community FR-020 Extractions from Volunteer Minimum 10 Minimum 10 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Department Preference; GC Affairs Database years years Ppr &OD §60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 407 ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-5 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention begins after settlement). FIRE/COMMUNITY RISK Not Less Life of the Life of the Fire Construction Documents Than 180 (Submittals,Approved Plans, days from Structure or Structure or Fire/ Activity, or Activity, or Mag, Yes: ,n� et seq. , 1�� Drawings,Applications,Alternate the date of Community FR-021 Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 10 CFC§ 104.7 Risk Means& Methods, and Similar completion years, years, Ppr &OD et seq.; H&S§19850 Documents Necessary for Ongoing of the Fire Code Compliance permitted Whichever is Whichever is work Longer Longer Fire/ Life of the Life of the Fire Inspections-Business Structure or Structure or Community Required for the Life of the Inspection Files/Occupancy Activity, or Activity, or Mag, Yes: Risk€� Structure or Activity,or Minimum 5 MaFSh i n FR-022 Inspections (Approvals, Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Inspections, Fires, Modification/ ears, ears, Ppr &OD Years CFC§§ 104.7— 104.7.4 Prevention Alternative Methods or Materials) Whichever is Whichever is Longer Lon er Life of the Life of the Fire/ Structure or Structure or Community Activity,or Activity,or Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Yes: Mag, Yes: Risk Fire— Fire Inspections-Citations/ Department Preference; CFC FR-023 ears,ars, years, Before Mfr, OD, S/I After QC �� Notice of Violations 104.7; GC§60201 et seq. Fire— Whichever is Whichever is Event Ppr &OD Prevention.+; Longer Longer �-�,� am �S years Fire/ Approved Fire Suppression, Fire Mag, Yes: Department preference(Building Community FR-024 Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, Private Fire P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC keeps original); CFC 104.7 104.6 Risk Underground, and High-Piled Ppr &OD et seq.; GC§§60200, H&S§19850 Combustible Storage Plans. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 408 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-6 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Fire/ Mag, Yes: Department Preference; GC Community FR-025 Juvenile Fire Setter Program 15 years 15 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §60201 et seq. Risk Ppr &OD Copies- Copies- When No When No Mag, Yes: Building keeps originals; GC Building FR-026 New Construction Plan Review Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Longer Longer Ppr &OD §§34090.7, 60201 Required Required Fire/ ,Mag Yes: Public Information/Education Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Community FR-027 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Risk (when produced internally) years years Ppr &OD §60201 Fire/ ,Mag Yes: Weed Abatement/Vegetation Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Community FR-028 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Risk Abatement/Brush Clearance years years Ppr &OD §60201 FIRE/EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Fire/ Mag, Yes: Community& Business Emergency Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Emergency FR-029 Response Training years years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §60201 Manage. Ppr &OD Drone (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) Does NOT record regular and Fire/ When No When No ongoing operations; For recordings Emergency FR-029.5 Recordings that are NOT evidence/Does NOT record regular and Longer Longer Mag that are evidence, see Fire Manage. ongoing operations Required Required Investigations(FR-042 or FR-043); GC§§60201, 53160 Fire/ Emergency Management Programs ,Mag Yes: Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Department Preference; GC Emergency FR-030 (Ready RC, Mitigation, Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Manage. Preparedness, etc.) years years Ppr &OD §60201 Emergency Response& Recovery Yes: Fire/ /FEMA/OES Reimbursement Mag' After QC Department Preference; GC Emergency FR-031 Claims/Strike Team 10 years 10 years Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I &OD §60201 Manage. Reimbursements Ppr RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 409 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-7 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Liti ation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement). Yes: Fire/ EOC Activations,After Incident Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Mag' After QC Department Preference; GC Emergency FR-032 Reports years years Yes(all) Mfr, OD, S/I &OD §60201 Manage. Ppr NO FIRE/EMERGENCY RESPONSE/EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Department Preference-required Fire/ for 3 2 years afte.inventory Controlled Substance Logs, Mag, Yes: transa�;on; 21 CFR§1304.04, Emergency FR-033 Inventories/Medic Monthly 3 years 3 years Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 1310.04; 22 CCR 70263 and Response/EMS Inventory Logs Ppr &OD 71233; FA§32003(e), B&P 4081; GC§60201 Fire/ Indefinite- Indefinite- Mag, Yes: Data is interrelated; Minors until 1 Emergency Emergency Medical PCR year after age 18, but not less than FR-034 Minimum 20 Minimum 20 Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Response/ Database 7 years; 10 years(see Patient EMS years years Ppr &OD Care Reports)GC§60201 Fire/ EMS Complaints/CQI (Continuous Final Final Mag, Yes: Statute of Limitations for health Emergency FR-035 Quality Improvement)/Quality Disposition + Disposition + Mfr, OD, S/I After QC providers is 3 years; CCP§340.5, Response/ Assurance 3 years 3 years Ppr &OD GC§60201 et seq. EMS Fire/ Yes: HIPAA Policies and Procedures Mag, Emercien9 Superseded Superseded After QC Response/ FR-036 (Health Insurance Portability and +6 years +6 years Mfr, OD, S/I &OD 4- 45 24 CFR 164.5300) EMS Accountability Act) Ppr I year RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 410 ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-8 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Department preference; 4 years is required by DPK Paramedic Fire/ Yes: Geed.,,., E,�,,eation ;s .,,qui Emergency Paramedic Continuing Education Separation + Separation + Mag, After QC for 4 .,eaFs by DPH; 8 CCR Response/ FR-037 Rosters and Certificates 4 ears 4 ears Ppr Mfr, OD, S/I &he 3204 d 1 et seq., 8 CCR§3203 EMS ina6tove et seq., 22 CCR 100395. 29 CFR 1627.3(b)(ii), LC§6429(c); GC §§12946, 12960, 60201 Department Preference; adults required for 10 7-years; minors until 1 year after age 18, but not less than 10 7-years; 10 years is Patient Care Reports/PCRs/ recommended by AHIMA for Paramedic Release Forms (EMS "healthcare providers"; Statute of Fire/ transportation)/Consent Form with Mag, Yes: Limitations for health providers is 3 Emergency After QC years; CCP§340.5, GC§60201; Response/ FR-038 Assignment of Benefits: ADULTS 10 years 10 7-years Mfr, OD, S/I &OD 4- H&S§§1797.98e 123145;42 CFR EMS (Includes e-PCR Database/ Ppr � 482.24(b); 9 r�4^�4, 22 CCR Electronic Patient Care Report Database) 70751(c)&71551(c); 22 CCR 70751(c), 71551(c), 73543(a), 74731(a), 75055(a), 75343(a), 77143(a),W&I 14124.1; CMS Pub. 100-4, Chapter 1, Section 110.3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 411 ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-9 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Department Preference; adults required for 10?years; minors until 1 year after age 18, but not less than 10 7-years; 10 years is Patient Care Reports/PCRs/ recommended by AHIMA for Paramedic Release Forms (EMS Age of Age of "healthcare providers"; Statute of Fire/ transportation)/Consent Form with Mag,Majority, Majority, Yes: Limitations for health providers is 3 FR-039 Assignment of Benefits: Mfr, OD, S/I Emergency Minimum 10 Minimum 10 After QC years; CCP§340.5, GC§60201; Response/ 7 years, 7 years, &OD 4- H&S§§1797.98e 123145;42 CFR EMS JUVENILES (Includes e-PCR whichever is whichever is Ppr year 482.24(b); 9 r�44T^, 22 CCR Database/Electronic Patient Care longer longer 70751(c)&71551(c); 22 CCR Report Database) 70751(c), 71551(c), 73543(a), 74731(a), 75055(a), 75343(a), 77143(a),W&I 14124.1; CMS Pub. 100-4, Chapter 1, Section 110.3 FIRE/EMERGENCY RESPONSE/FIRE MARSHAL Fire/ Mag, Yes: Department preference; CFC Emergency FR-040 Alarm Installation Waiver Forms: P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §§104.7-104.7.4 104.6— Response/ Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Fire Marshal Ppr &OD 4944; GC§60201 et seq. Indefinite- Indefinite- Data is interrelated; California Fire Life of the Life of the Code requires 5 years or Life of Fire/ Structure or Structure or the Structure or Activity for FR-041 Fire Incident RMS Database Yes Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Emergency Activity, or Activity, or Mag, Yes: Approvals, Inspections, Fires, Response/ Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Ppr &OD Modification/Alternative Methods Fire Marshal years, years, or Materials; CFC§§ 104.7- Whichever is Whichever is 104.7.4 104.6 .6.4; GC Longer Longer §34090 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 412 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-10 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Fire/ Mag, Yes: Department preference(Capital Emergency FR-042 Fire Investigations-Arson & P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Crimes have no statute of Response/ Capital Crimes Only Fire Marshal Ppr &OD limitations); GC§60201 et seq. Fire/ Emergency Fire Investigations-OTHER Than Minimum 5 Minimum 5 Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Response/ FR-043 Arson &Capital Crimes years years Mfr, OD, S/I After D §60201 et seq. Fire Marshal Ppr &OD Fire/ Approved Fire Suppression , Fire Emergency Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, Private Fire Mag, Yes: Department preference(Building FR-044 P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC keeps original); CFC 104.7 104.6 Response/ Underground, and High-Piled Ppr &OD et seq.; GC§§60200, H&S§19850 Fire Marshal Combustible Storage Plans Fire/ Life of the Mag, Yes: Emergency Fireflow Testing (CVWD does Life of the Department preference; GC FR-045 Structure or Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Response/ testing) Structure §60201 Fire Marshal Activity Ppr &OD Fire/ Yes: Department Preference(City has Emergency Hazardous Waste Manifests/ Mag, cradle to grave" liability); 40 CFR FR-046 5 years P P Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Response/ Certificates of Disposal Ppr &OD 262.40, 8 CCR 3204(d)(1)(A), 22 Fire Marshal p CCR 66262.40 Fire/ When No When No Mag, Yes: Emergency FR-047 Response Planning Longer Longer Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Preliminary drafts; GC§60201 Response/ Fire Marshal Required Required Ppr &OD Special Event Permits/Fire Code Fire/ Permits/Operating Permits/ Yes: Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Emergency Explosives Permits /Fireworks Minimum 5 Minimum 5 FR-048 — Before Mfr, OD, S/I After QC §60201 CFC§§ 104.7— 104.7.4 Response/ Permits/Burn Permits(assembly 2 years 2 years Event Ppr &OD 104.6 104.6.4- Fire Marshal permits, candle permits, tent permits, open flame, etc.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 413 Ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-11 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act requests, audits and/or investigations suspend normal retention periods retention begins after settlement). FIRE/STATION OPERATIONS/SUPPRESSION Mag, Yes: Lead Dept. FR-049 AQMD Permits(Generators, etc.) 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 40 CFR 70.6; GC§60201 Ppr &OD Fire/ Yes: Station Mag, After QC Operations/ FR-050 Daily Evaluations/Rookie Tests 2 years 2 years Mfr, OD, S/I &OD GC§60201 Suppressio Ppr When n Ohs inae#+ve Fire/ Station Daily Vehicle Inspections/Daily Maq, Yes: Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Operations/ FR-051 Equipment Checks/Safety Mfr, OD, S/I After QC GC§60201 Suppressio Equipment Inspections years years Ppr &OD n-0 P—S Fire Vehicle,Apparatus, & Department Preference; If a motor Fire/ Equipment History Files, Ladders, Disposal of Disposal of carrier, required for 18 months Station etc. Vehicle, Vehicle,Apparatus, Apparatus, Mag, Yes: after vehicle is sold; CHP requires Operations/ FR-052 Mfr, OD, S/I After QC life of vehicle; OSHA requires 1 Suppressio Certifications, Maintenance, or or Ppr &OD year; 8 CCR§3203(b)(1);49 CFR n Ops Registrations, Safety Certifications, Equipment+ Equipment+ 396.21(b)(1); 49 CFR 396.3(c); etc. 2 years 2 years CCP§337 et. Seq., GC§60201 Generator Operation Logs& Mag, Yes: Lead Dept. FR-053 Inspections-Fixed/Stationary 3 years 3 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC AQMD Rule 1470; GC§60201 Generators Ppr &OD Generator Operation Logs& Mag, Yes: AQMD Rule 1470; Form Lead Dept. FR-054 Inspections-Portable/ 5 years 5 years Mfr, OD, S/I After QC 400—E-13a instructions; GC Emergency Generators Ppr &OD §60201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 414 ver20.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - FIRE Page FR-12 (Community Affairs, Community Risk, Emerg. Mgt., Emerq Response, EMS, Fire Marshal, Station Ops / Suppression) Office of Records Records Description Retention/Disposition Comments/Reference Record Series# Image: Destroy Inactive Paper (OFR) Active (Records Total Vital? Media 1=Import after (in office) Center) Retention Options M=Mfr Imaged & S=Scan If the record is not listed here, refer to the Retention for City-Wide Standards Retentions begin when the act is completed, and imply a full file folder(e.g. last document+2 years), since destruction is normally performed by file folder. HOLDS:Litigation, claims, complaints, public records act re uests, audits and/or investi ations suspend normal retention periods retention be ins after settlement. Fire/ Station Yes: Mag, Yes: When When Preliminary drafts; GC§60201 et Operations/ FR-055 Pre-plan Sheets Before Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Suppressio Superseded Superseded Event Ppr &OD seq. n Ops Fire/ Station Station Log Books/Red Books/ Minimum 2 Minimum 2 Yes: Mag, Yes: Department preference; GC Operations/ FR-056 Before Mfr, OD, S/I After QC Suppressio Log Books years years Event Ppr &OD §60201 et seq. n Ops RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. ©1995-2019 Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc(909)337-3516 all rights reserved Do not duplicate or distribute without prior written permission Revision Adopted: 6/5/2024 Page 415 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure I Five-Year Capital Projects Needs Analysis Covering Fiscal Years 2026/27 Through 2030/31. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-069) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Measure I Five- Year Capital Project Needs Analysis covering Fiscal Years 2026/27 through 2030/31. BACKGROUND: Measure 1 2010-2040 Strategic Plan (Plan), the county-wide transportation sales tax program approved by voters, requires each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Programs to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis (CPNA) which outlines the specific projects upon which Measure I Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Program funds will be expended. ANALYSIS: Staff has prepared the Five-Year CPNA for consideration by the City Council for adoption. Upon adoption, the CPNA will be kept on file with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for informational purposes. The CPNA consists of a list of eligible capital improvement projects, along with their anticipated costs that have been or are expected to be constructed during the upcoming five (5) years. Upon completion of a project in the Plan, the City may seek reimbursement for the Measure I share of the project costs based on the availability of funds allocated to the City. Funds are allocated to the City by the SBCTA Board of Directors on an annual basis and roll-over if not fully expended. The CPNA includes two (2)widening projects and traffic signal improvements at seven (7) locations. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will meet SBCTA Five-Year CPNA requirements allowing the City to seek reimbursement of eligible expenses in line with SBCTA policy. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council' s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality public improvement that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - CPNA Resolution Page 416 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION 25-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026/2027 THROUGH 2O30/2031 WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04- 01 of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from certain Measure I Programs to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES to adopt the Measure I Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis for Fiscal Years 2026/2027 through 2030/2031, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this Xt" day of Month, 2025. Resolution No. 25-OXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 417 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 10,567,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Wilson Avenue from East Avenue PA&ED to Wardman Bullock-Widen from Total Cost: $165,000.00 0 to 4 Lanes Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 117,650.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 47,350.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $740,541.00 $7,434,218.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 528,007.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 212,534.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $3,199,098.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $62,355.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 44,451.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Comments: DEV FEE $ 17,657.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - MI LOCAL ST $ 247.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - -Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $3,518,918.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 2,508,990.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 999,610.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - MI LOCAL ST $ 10,318.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ 1$ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 1 Page 418 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 554,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Widen Victoria Avenue from PA&ED Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $16,640.00 $412,341.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 11,864.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 471.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: MI LOCAL ST $ 4,305.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - -Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $293,999.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $395,701.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 282,135.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - MI LOCAL ST $ 113,566.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 2 Page 419 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 481,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of Rochester Avenue Total Cost: $0.00 and Jersey Boulevard Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $13,750.00 $738,737.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $526,720.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $724,987.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ 1$ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 3 Page 420 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 481,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3 Dev.Share: 28.70 Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30131 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of Milliken Avenue Total Cost: $0.00 and 5th Street Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Other: $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $13,750.00 $738,737.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ - $ $ $ - $ $ DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ $526,720.00 Other: $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ Comments: Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Other: $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ CONST Total Cost: $724,987.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ - $ $ $ - $ $ DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Select Fund- $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ Other: $ $ $ I$ $ $ $ *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 4 Page 421 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 481,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of East Avenue and Total Cost: $0.00 Miller Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $13,750.00 $738,737.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $526,720.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $724,987.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ 1$ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 5 Page 422 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 539,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of Carnelian Street Total Cost: $0.00 and Banyan Street Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $12,271.00 $600,297.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 8,749.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 3,522.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $428,012.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $588,026.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 419,263.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 168,763.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 6 Page 423 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 539,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of 6th Street and Total Cost: $0.00 Utica Avenue Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $7,920.00 $595,946.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 5,647.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 2,273.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $424,910.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $588,026.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 419,263.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 168,763.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 7 Page 424 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 481,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of 6th Street and Total Cost: $0.00 Rochester Avenue Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $13,750.00 $738,737.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 9,804.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 3,946.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $526,720.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $724,987.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 516,916.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 208,071.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ 1$ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 8 Page 425 Capital Project Needs Analysis Nexus Project Cost $ 617,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev.Loan? No Valley Arterial Sub-Program 5-Year Advance? No Public Share: 71.3% Dev.Share: 28.70% Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR* FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FUTURE Construct a Traffic Signal at the PA&ED Intersection of 6th Street and Total Cost: $0.00 Hellman Avenue Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Current Total Project Cost PS&E Estimate: Total Cost: $45,891.00 $1,081,710.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 32,720.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 13,171.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total Measure I Request: Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $771,973.00 Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - (Summation of Measure 1) ROW Total Cost: $0.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Comments: Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ - CONST Total Cost: $1,036,819.00 Fund Type: MSI Arterial $ 739,253.00 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - DEV FEE $ 297,566.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Select Fund- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Other: $ $ $ $ 1$ $ $ - *Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by SBCTA including anticipated FY 2023/2024 expenses. 2027-2031 CPNA_07-08-2025-Proj 9 Page 426 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2025/26 Through 2029/30. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-070) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy as requested by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure I funds. BACKGROUND: Measure 1, the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues from the program annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) which outlines the specific projects and anticipated costs for which Measure I funds will be used. In addition to adopting the Plan, the City is required by SBCTA Policy No. 40003 to annually acknowledge the requirement to meet the minimum General Fund Maintenance of Effort (MOE) level approved by both the City Council and SBCTA Board in February and March 2016 respectively. The required MOE level for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is $2,225,757. ANALYSIS: Staff has prepared the Plan (Attachment 1 —Exhibit A)for consideration by the City Council. Upon adoption of the resolution, the plan will be kept on file with SBCTA for informational purposes. The Plan includes pavement rehabilitation, traffic signal and striping improvements, and concrete repairs and improvements in Fiscal Year 2025/26 and aligns with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget. In addition to the Plan, the City is required to adopt the attached Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy (Attachment 1 — Exhibit B). This strategy is a narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure I Funds are to be used for and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of project. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will meet the SBTCA Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE, and Expenditure Strategy requirements allowing the City to continue receiving Measure I funding. Page 427 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring continued funding for the construction of high quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-070 Page 2 Page 428 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FY2025/2026 THROUGH FY2029/2030 WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04-01 of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Local Street Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code 190300 and Ordinance No. 04-01 require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportation- related construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, which for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $2,225,757. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HERBY RESOLVES, that the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and the Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy — Fiscal Year 2025/26 thru 2029/30 (Exhibit B) are hereby adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2025. Page 429 Resolution Number: Jurisdiction: Resolution Approval Date: 8/20/2/20/202 Exhibit A 5 Measure I Local Pass-through Program Contact Personrrille: Marlene Perez FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Rancho Cucamonga Phone: (909).Perez city Fiscal Years 2025/2026 thru 2029/2030 Email: Marlena.Perez@cilyofrc.us 6130125 Carryover Balance $8,501,006.91 Is Project in FY2025126 Est.Revenue FY2026127 Est.Revenue FY2027128 Est.Revenue FY2028129 Est.Revenue FY2029/30 Est.Revenue Total Est.Rev. Cltys Does Project Is the Projecton the Cilys Non-motonzed have an ATP Nexus Study List? Estimated Total $4,518,295 $4,643,903 $4,773,928 $4,909,020 $5,049,902 $23,895,048 Transportation Component? Project Cost (Public/DIF Share%) Plan? (Yes/No) Current Current Current Current Current Total Projects: (Yes/No) Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Citywide Concrete Repair No No 0.0% 0.0% $4,882,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Major Traffic Signal Repairs No No 0.0% 0.0% $187,000 $193,545 $200,319 $207,330 $214,587 $222,097 $1,037,878 Signal Contract Services-Maintenance Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,023,000 $1,058,805 $1,095,863 $1,134,218 $1,173,916 $1,215,003 $5,677,806 Striping Contract Service-Maintenance Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $750,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $750,000 Local Street Rehabilitation-Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $23,205,000 $1,517,500 $2,345,000 $2,462,500 $2,580,000 $2,697,500 $11,602,500 Jasper Street Curb Ramp Improvement Yes Yes 0.0%1 0.0% $279,500 $0 $279,500 $0 $0 $0 $279,500 Banyan Street and East Avenue Improvement Project No No 0.0% 0.0% $2,323,350 $0 $2,223,350 $0 $0 $0 $2,223,350 Banyan Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Enhancements Project Yes Yes 0.0% 0.0% $3,020,000 $0 $154,880 $1,971,200 $0 $0 $2,126,080 Pecan Avenue Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project No No 0.0% 0.0%1 $1,774,886 $1,774,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,774,886 Local Roadway Safely Plan Improvements Program No Yes 0.0% 0.0% $3,721,700 $56,000 $93,000 $150,000 $300,000 $0 $599,000 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0%1 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $01 Sol Sol Sol $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $o $o $o $o $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $o $o $o $o $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 $o $o $o $o $o $0 Projects Total: $4,850,736 $6,641,912 $6,175,249 $4,518,503 $4,384,600 $26,571,000 (Must not exceed 150%of Carryover Total Estimated Pro Total Programming is currently 82% Balance+Total Estimated Revenue) Programming: $26,571,000 Page 1 of 1 Page 430 Exhibit B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY Fiscal Year 2025/2026 thru 2029/2030 Each jurisdiction shall adopt a Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adoption. The Expenditure Strategy is not intended to be a narrative description of the projects listed in the Capital Improvement Plan. Instead, the Expenditure Strategy should provide the policy approach adopted by the Council for the expenditure of Measure I funds. The jurisdictional Expenditure Strategy provides an opportunity to document circumstances or analyses which are not otherwise apparent when reviewing the Measure I Capital Improvement Plan. You must include the strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adopted by your governing body. The Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for the expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as its basis. The City currently has an estimated carryover balance of approximately $8.5 million in the Measure I Local Street fund and anticipates approximately$4.5 million in new revenue for Fiscal Year 2025/26. In this next fiscal year, the City is planning to use approximately $4.9 million on local street capital projects and programs as follows: Type of Improvement Estimated Cost FY Percentage 2025/26 Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Repair $3.3 million 67% of Existing Roadways Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement $1.5 million 31% Striping, and Maintenance Concrete Services (ADA, Repairs and $100,000 2% Sidewalks Over the Five-Year Plan it is anticipated that the Measure I funds will be allocated in the foIlowing manner: Type of Improvement Estimated Cost Percentage FY 2025/26 — 2029/30 Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Repair $15.6 million 59% of Existing Roadways Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement $10.2 million 38% Striping, and Maintenance Concrete Services (ADA, Repairs and $800,000 3% Sidewalks Page 431 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Rick Flinchum, Deputy Director of Finance Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve and Adopt a Resolution Certifying the Results of an Election and Adding Annexation No. 2025-11 to Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-068) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: The City staff recommends the City Council to approve and adopt the Resolution Certifying the Results of an Election and Adding Annexation No. 2025-11 to Community Facilities District No. 2022-01. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-063 (the "Resolution Authorizing Future Annexation") authorizing the future annexation of territory to Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) (the "CFD 2022-01") to provide maintenance and services to streetlights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities for new development. The City conditions property owners to annex such properties into the existing CFD 2022-01 to fund street light service and maintenance. In July 2025, the Property Owner signed an Annexation Proceeding Deposit Agreement to initiate the annexation process. ANALYSIS: In August 2025, the Property Owner submitted their Consent and Waivers and Official Ballot, to the City Clerk's Office Election Official. The Election Official has canvassed the ballot and completed their statement of votes cast (See Exhibit "A" of the Resolution). The Property Owner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the special tax levy for CFD 2022-01. Adoption of this Resolution constitutes the City Council's formal action certifying the election results and adding the Annexation Territory to CFD 2022-01 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of the property within the Annexation Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. A map showing the property is included in the Resolution. Page 432 FISCAL IMPACT: CFD 2022-01 was formed to be financially self-sufficient, meaning the revenues generated by the District offset the costs of providing services and can be adjusted annually based on changes in the overall operating costs of streetlights. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating our future by ensuring that new development is fiscally sustainable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution Certifying the Results of an Election and Adding Annexation 2025-11 Page 2 Page 433 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF AN ELECTION AND ADDING TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-01 (STREET LIGHTING SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANNEXATION NO. 2025-11 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council") has previously formed Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("CFD No. 2022-01") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act"), as amended, for the purpose of financing certain municipal maintenance services; and WHEREAS, acting pursuant to the Act, the City Council also authorized by the adoption of Resolution No. 2022-063 (the "Resolution Authorizing Future Annexation") the annexation in the future of territory to CFD No. 2022-01, such territory designated as Future Annexation Area, Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (the "Future Annexation Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time the unanimous consent to the annexation of certain territory located within the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2022-01 has been received from the property owner of such territory, and such territory has been designated as ANNEXATION NO. 2025-11 (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Territory for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the election date established for the Territory, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified elector of the Territory shall be the "landowner," as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f), of such Territory and such landowner who is the owner of record as of the applicable election date, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of the parcel of land that landowner owns within such Territory; and WHEREAS, the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes on the Territory to the qualified elector thereof and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified elector of the Territory; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has caused a ballot to be distributed to the qualified elector of the Territory, has received and canvassed such ballot and made a report to the City Council regarding the results of such canvass, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and Resolution 2025-068 - Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 434 WHEREAS, at this time the measure voted upon and such measure did receive the favorable vote of the qualified elector of the Territory, and the City Council desires to declare the results of the election; and WHEREAS, a map showing the Territory and designated as Annexation Map No. 2025-11 (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "B" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, has been submitted to this legislative body. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. This legislative body does hereby further determine as follows: A. The unanimous consent as described in the recitals hereto to the annexation of the Territory to CFD No. 2022-01 has been given by the owner of the Territory and such consent shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Territory for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the election date established for the each of the parcels located within the Territory, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified elector for the Territory shall be the "landowner" of the Territory as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f). C. The qualified elector of the Territory has voted in favor of the levy of special taxes on the Territory upon its annexation to CFD No. 2022-01. Section 3. Territory. The boundaries and parcels of property within the Territory and on which special taxes will be levied in order to pay for the costs and expenses of authorized municipal maintenance services are shown on the Annexation Map as submitted to and hereby approved by this legislative body. Section 4. Declaration of Annexation. This legislative body does hereby determine and declare that the Territory, and each parcel therein, is now added to and becomes a part of CFD No. 2022-01. The City Council, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2022-01, is hereby empowered to levy the authorized special tax within the Territory. Section 5. Notice. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, notice shall be given as follows: Resolution 2025-068 - Page 2 of 3 Page 435 A. A copy of the Annexation Map as approved shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder no later than fifteen (15) days after the date of adoption of this Resolution. B. An Amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien (Notice of Annexation) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder no later than fifteen (15) days after the date of adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025. Resolution 2025-068 - Page 3 of 3 Page 436 EXHIBIT "A" CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HERESY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing vaith Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of CaliVnia, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 022-01 (STREET LIGHTING SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL ELECTION ANNEXATION NO. 2025-11 hold on the election date established for each parcel located within the territory included in Annexation No. 025-11. FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement otdotes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No_ 2 022-01 (Street Lighting $ervices) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for or against the Measure are full, true and correct_ VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION 1; YES � NO WITNESS my hand this day of _� y 2425. E ION OFFICIAL IT'f ER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA A- 1 Page 437 EXHIBIT "B" ANNEXATION MAP H d o o¢y n o w F¢a u a � m zo W n=�=a�eLL� r 10 2 O 2QCx Q`-'= S =Q W O t� ca=S❑=o c»Qr~iw V n aw�..a V�Q a x u Q V W 7`-'QQN❑C ou H Q sy [j r ¢J x LLp¢OOy W 12, ay}o ¢J [[ ZQ LL LLr p n 4C4�S =s Vu V_ Q W~ CS W p wwanua 8 W K N 9 ¢=w Ow ~V!Y K(7 J C 7 S j V xxx�f[ LL oOmVO 0 >Q> a iLLm ow s>, aw W q w �LL a C �+ 'S p0 a� Z 0c¢i w 00 M1vip5 A'a W T =O W 2 V o rc 2 LLO D o V' N V LLoz } �� O LLr �� ❑ w �i x uvvu�arxv x v W W = V O C 0 a V LL y W m DO ❑ LL of f Z V' m O p. V p = L] x 0 w F LL p x y LL y z z L'W=a Z Q y� p O W yy V 02 C R2N�WFS��2 m L=] Q ¢¢G Ga wW O Q S Q Y v p[7 OFx y6 H � Y= 2 Ym w [a �= rr� t�v Z= Z re y �Z ❑ xDo LUo J m�w �r2°n02w`w�O �� m G y 6 wyw C w� Q rr B]u] Crr]ToT �WW WiVW W�~=VNW �0 2 iw= wwm w C 3 CC Lu 0 W y ZV' ¢¢ yy yoyy9¢Za fy� Q' V m V pV�TeCm 7y o¢� VV H ��Od S Qi¢vi wC LL ;L) ° O "� J U � 4QV w N= LL N NZOW r. r 0 °� z z 0 Q o � ❑wrY 'a Z w~ Z 0 P=LrL ll,�, J C1] m W Lij W U z zw � a Z)� z D O000-z"6LSli0 9 Q_ L) NdV J yam"'•\ 8 JE ,. F 7anrlse� N N O m x = W d w n 0 x � w a p V F F U o a Gm r o 0 W Z W _ z W w q� ( s W ¢ V W w of V a w 0� 'Ti � OE 7! a 0, J LU B - 1 Page 438 NONgq I � DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 0225-191-32, Proposed to be Annexed Into Community Facilities District No. 88-1; Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 88-25-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1; and Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025- 021) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-022) (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: 1. Adopt a Resolution adopting "Annexation Map No. 88-25-1" showing Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 0225-191-32 (13341 Banyan Street), proposed to be annexed in Community Facilities District No. 88-1; and 2. Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as "Annexation No. 88-25- 1" into Community Facilities District No. 88-1 to specify the services to be financed, to set and specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed, and 3. Set a time and place for a public hearing regarding Annexation No. 88-25-1. BACKGROUND: The property owner of APN 0225-191-32 (13341 Banyan Street), located within the Fire Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District to annex "Annexation No. 88-25-1" into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. ANALYSIS: In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving Annexation Map No. 88-25-1 of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Authorize the Annexation of Annexation No. 88-25-1. Resolution No. FD 2025-021 will adopt "Annexation Map No. 88-25-1" showing the property Page 439 proposed to be annexed into CFD No. 88-1 (Attachment 1). The territory is inclusive of the entire development project proposed by the Property Owner. Resolution No. FD 2025-022 declares the Fire Board intention to authorize the annexation of territory "Annexation No. 88-25-1" to CFD No. 88-1 (Attachment 2). The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a)the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District shown in Exhibit "A"; (b) a description of the services and facilities which will, in part, be financed through the levy of the special tax on the Territory if annexed shown in Exhibit "B"; (c) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax shown in Exhibit "C"; (d) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for September 17, 2025, (e) election requirements. Special Counsel for the District has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolutions are considered to be routine and non- controversial, as the property owners are in support of the annexation procedure. On September 17, 2025, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. FISCAL IMPACT: The special tax revenues that are collected from CFD No. 88-1 are used to pay for public facilities and services in the District area. Costs related to the administering of the District are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. Annexation of the property ensures the property owner covers the cost of increased demand for fire services resulting from new development within the Territory. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item brings together portions of the Council's vision and core value by providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Annexation of the property into CFD 88-1 ensures the delivery of vital fire and life safety services to all residents while satisfying fire protection service mitigation impacts. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. FD 2025-021, Adopting Annexation No. 88-25-1 Map Attachment 2 — Resolution No. FD 2025-022, Intention to Authorize Annexation No. 88-25-1 Attachment 3— Notice of Public Hearing for Fire Secretary for Annexation No. 88-25-1 Page 2 Page 440 RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 88-25-1) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California , and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-25-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2: The Annexation Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. Section 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the Annexation Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2025. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX - Page 1 of 1 ATTACH M T 4141 RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-25-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the Board Of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-25-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88- 1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, the map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt the Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to the District, to describe the territory included within the District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the facilities and services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such facilities and services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. 2. Legal Authority. These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. 3. Intention to Annex; Description of the Territory and the District. The Board of Directors hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. A description of the Territory is as follows: All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the Territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on original maps of the District and the territories Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 1 of 11 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 442 subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the District, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" (the "Annexation Map"). Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. 4. Services and Facilities Authorized to be Financed by the District. The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District are generally described in Exhibit "B" (the "Services and Facilities") attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and all costs associated the District, administration of the District, the determination of the amount of special taxes to be levied, the costs of collection any special taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District. If and to the extent feasible the Services and Facilities shall be provided in common within the existing District and the Territory. 5. Special Taxes. It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and Facilities and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non- exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit "C" (the "Special Tax Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services and Facilities in the existing District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services and Facilities in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services and Facilities in the existing District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the special tax formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District. 6. Public Hearing. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 2 of 11 Page 443 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS, MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED. ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITING. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. 7. Maiority Protest. If a written majority protest against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District is filed, and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. 8. Election. If following the public hearing described in the Section above, the Board of Directors determines to proceed with the annexation of the Territory to the District, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. 9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk by causing the publication of a Notice of Public Hearing in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2025. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 3 of 11 Page 444 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION MAP 4 a 44 _O 2 0 o pwO�OQ~ nrw p � ❑u p w N__ V - 6 2 w 4 W Cw QF CDYyr - W y 4 6 fY J w Z 0 x LL p r q p _ W u u 6Vrw'a� EQqWmVO u 00u w❑ 7 0600ay� gC76 (Y or Qom us / N =W H p W p F i¢ H p=O w 6 w C W 0 OC V V O 6 mZw¢'uLL0 CQ2 mOfY 4 w ��w a Ha � � � 2fLLOV❑ IOij❑�W V r�r ¢ m J nw G W � r+�CQ7 wen W Odu4"��C V u I s G o a sIn,"s ao p Qs � =w�zw=y5i wu ti O w O 0 z w w o i ur.vwua S �O w a u LL ~O ~Q u p x W w p O p�`V p 0 w u C w i W y g w x w ti F p V p V ❑ F i w LL w V 1 2 m m O W ~ _❑ W 1 K i fte H O w m 2 m o p 0 2 V 0 ❑ F y -z' V C]Q'µ`6 LL = w_� e J4' 2 O 4 2WLLLL0� sxV�xp� a � LL � p f7 Hwp Om�Ri6~CfYw2w m H w p ww 0 ear moan 0 [) Z LL d W C7 V Z '0' �V x 2 w 0 V pc' H O W H 0 uuCll 0 m U LL Li O f O I~C a F H K n 2 2 2 y w F O J 2 6 p q Wf 3}a fw❑ay.6 o Q ¢ VO a00m 2pZ n`� ¢N¢ sH V FH �u Qa�zuc. pw0=67v Z 2 p 0 Z�Q ul xO O ¢ HHwH FwF�LL� 6 z Se Opz m p F 2 2 C 2 m t V V O V r w p p 2 W Q 6 Q (7 w w y HO V wa C V Cw'w'w'C w' W Jr LLw W 2 C V w w W Wm [-] C W V Z W fY y y a y 2(j p J a Ur V Z = N 2 w a off Q Z2 �� en¢ _�oo¢oo¢LLaVau w�¢ � ��oaS ¢ mo N� ¢a ❑❑ �a LL co 0 J S w 7�� D 0p xr r 2WLL 3 �l7 V~W F-aQ a o�� Q U,FL0 P(90 z ::izw LL �� ¢LU LU F- W ZUQ z ::)0U) Q 200 0� U W j b£ L6L SZZO �❑ Ndd U LL- 3Ad 1SV3 ono ry� N O m W 2 P m n E n z Er ¢ z aLU p V II L LL s� o W W ¢ � w � = a V w UU W C7 w $ m 0 d J Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 4 of 11 Page 445 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 BOUNDARY MAP TA � m 6 ■ • 00 :3 Z CO » o A � 0 ��,----------� a,g / � G E 2 � � / C 2 ® - cm L rj 2 | C « U o \ [ i1w « % 2 —Wild LL ....__� B" k � q, m k-----! r c . E ° | z § . » E # ] • & R o . _ r - U # 2 | , . �... Ali - • 2 � � ■ ■| � . ) - } |■ z :®----� #�_, AV.DARN | \ - , ; AV-mJ i,- � $ | ■ -U� �AV plmq!pv P1vq1t4wV a ; % § �u - - � § P i 2 wimp ------ � —iiiiiIdEL I .0k A- �--�---���' |� �l�� Z2 2 ! -E ! ■ � � ;� �. ] "A v .qI! Resolution No. FD 2025-XX Page 5 0 ]] Page 446 EXHIBIT "B" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES The Services. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services (the "Services") that are in addition to those currently provided in or required for the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be financed is as follows: The performance of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory. The Facilities. It is the intention of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities (the "Facilities") that are in addition to those currently provided to serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already available to serve the Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with a useful life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting from new development within the Territory. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 6 of 11 Page 447 EXHIBIT "C" FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method") as originally established for and as applied to the taxable properties within such community facilities district is as follows: "The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax so as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be required for payment for such landowner's or resident's property. PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are three categories of property subject to special taxation, which are identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessor's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY All property which of as May 31 of any year is subject to an approved Development Agreement with either the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino, an approved Annexation Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or a recorded Final Subdivision Map or Final Parcel Map, but for which no building permit has been issued. 3. VACANT PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of the Special Tax, is: (i) owned by public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 7 of 11 Page 448 TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the maximum authorized Special Tax rates for fiscal year 1988-1989 are as follows: TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (More than 3,590 square feet of $292 per year dwelling unit living area) B. Residential Class II (3,077 — 3,589 square feet of $225 per year dwelling unit living area) C. Residential Class III (2,564 — 3,076 square feet of $180 per year dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class IV (2,308 — 2,563 square feet of $157 per year dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V (2,051 — 2,307 square feet of $135 per year dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (1,795 — 2,050 square feet of $124 per year dwelling unit living area) * G. Residential Class VI (less — 1,795 square feet of $112 per year dwelling unit living area) * $449 per acre per year or $0.04 H. Commercial or Industrial Property per SF or building area, whichever is greater** 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre *** Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 8 of 11 Page 449 * The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. ** The square footage of a commercial or industrial building area shall mean the gross square footage for the building as reflected in the building plans upon which any building permits for the building were issued. *** The acreage of a Vacant Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. ESCALATION OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES The maximum annual Special Tax rates applicable to all Developed Property shall be subject to escalation each July 1 commencing July 1, 1989, by the change factor calculated annually by the State of California Department of Finance for the purpose of increasing appropriations limits of State and local governments. In the event that the Department of Finance or its successor ceases to calculate the annual change factor, such Special Tax rates shall be subject to annual escalation not to exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area for the preceding twelve (12) month reporting period. The maximum Special Tax rates applicable to all Approved Property and Vacant Property shall not be subject to escalation. METHOD OF APPROTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such future public improvements, services or debt service; direct payment for public improvements; or payment of the operational and maintenance expenses of providing fire suppression and protection services to properties within the Community Facilities District. The annual levy of the Special Taxes shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: Fifty percent (50%) of the estimated ad valorem property tax revenue to be collected from properties within the Community Facilities District in the subject fiscal year which are allocable to the Foothill Fire Protection District shall be allocated to pay the estimated expenses of the Community Facilities District for the subject fiscal year. The remainder of the estimated expenses shall be referred to as the Net CFD Expenses. STEP 2: That equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax revenues equal to the Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Approved Property necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on Approved Property. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 9 of 11 Page 450 STEP 4: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that percentage of all the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Vacant Property necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on all Vacant Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (i) the Special Tax rate which would be levied on each Developed Property pursuant to STEP 2 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax. The Base Maximum Special Tax means an amount equal to $0.0025 per square foot subject to escalation at the same rate and at the same time applicable to the maximum Special Tax rates for Developer Property. B. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the minimum Special Tax which shall be levied on all taxable properties within the Community Facilities District each Fiscal Year shall be: DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $1.00 per dwelling unit for residential uses $1.00 per acre for commercial/industrial uses APPROVED PROPERTY: $1.00 per lot or parcel VACANT PROPERTY: $1.00 per acre The ad valorem property tax contribution identified in Step 1 shall be reduced in any Fiscal Year by the amount by which the sum of such contribution and the minimum Special Taxes would exceed the estimated expenses of the Community Facilities District for such Fiscal Year The "Report" of the Special Tax Consultant, to be approved as a part of the record upon the conclusion of the public hearing pertaining to the formation of the Community Facilities District, shall set forth supplementary details pertaining to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax and shall provide controlling guidance in the interpretation and implementation of this Rate and Method of Apportionment." Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 10 of 11 Page 451 Application of the CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method to Annexation No. 88-25-1 The maximum special tax authorized to be levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26 within that area annexed to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, known and designated as Annexation No. 88-25-1 is as follows: MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (More than 3,590 square feet of $1,962.78 per year dwelling unit living area) B. Residential Class 11 (3,077- 3,589 square feet of $1,505.04 per year dwelling unit living area) C. Residential Class III (2,564- 3,076 square feet of $1,201.04 per year dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class IV (2,308-2,563 square feet of $1,052.70 per year dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V (2,051 -2,307 square feet of $900.85 per year dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (1,795-2,050 square feet of $832.06 per year dwelling unit living area) G. Residential Class VII (less - 1,795 square feet of $751.37 per year dwelling unit living area) $3,020.97 per acre per year or H. Commercial or Industrial Property $0.24421 per square foot or building, whichever is greater 2.APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel 3.VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre The maximum special tax rates set forth above are subject to escalation pursuant to the CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method commencing July 1, 1989. Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX Page 11 of 11 Page 452 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ANNEXATION TO EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION NO. 88-25-1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board Of Directors (the "Legislative Body") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Fire Protection District") is desirous to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, the existing Community Facilities District having been designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1, and the territory proposed to be annexed to be designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-25-1 (the "Annexation Area"). DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION AREA The Annexation Area shall consist of all of that area of land which is included within the boundaries as shown on a map designated as Annexation No. 88-25-1 for the above referenced Community Facilities District. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES The proposed services to be provided to serve the Annexation Area are generally described as follows: The performance of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. Such services shall be shared between the existing Community Facilities District and the Annexation Area. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed by the Annexation is as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with a useful life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting from new development within the Territory. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025, AT THE HOUR OF 7 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730. AT SUCH TIME THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL HEAR ALL EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY BY ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, PROPERTY OWNERS, VOTERS AND TAXPAYERS, RELATING GENERALLY TO THE FOLLOWING: Page 453 A. Authorization to annex the Annexation Area to the existing Community Facilities District; B. Authorization to levy special taxes in the Annexation Area. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS, MAY APPEAR AND PRESENT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF ANNEXATION AREA TO THE EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. ANY PROTEST PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX THE ANNEXATION AREA TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MUST BE IN WRITING, AND SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AT THE ADDRESS SET FORTH ABOVE ON OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING. IF A MAJORITY PROTEST IS TIMELY FILED AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE ANNEXATION AREA, THE LEGISLATIVE BODY SHALL ABANDON THE PROCEEDINGS OR MODIFY THE PROCEEDINGS. IF SAID MAJORITY PROTEST IS LIMITED TO CERTAIN SERVICES OR SPECIAL TAX, THOSE SERVICES OR THAT TAX SHALL BE ELIMINATED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY. SPECIAL TAX The services and facilities shall be financed through the levy of special taxes on all property within the existing Community Facilities District, as well as the Annexation Area. A copy of the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax is on file in the Office of the Fire Chief and is available for inspection during normal office hours. ELECTION Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board will conduct a special election on September 17, 2025, where the annexation proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors, being the property owners, with each owner having one (1) vote per acre or portion thereof of land owned within the proposed annexed territory. INQUIRIES For any questions relating to the proceedings or any particulars, please contact the following designated person: MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 For further particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory to an Existing Community Facilities District and the original Report of the Tax Consultant, as said documents have been approved and are on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection. Publish: Date Kim Sevy, Secretary Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Acting on behalf of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Page 454 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution in Support of the Inland Empire Job Corps and Urging Continued Federal Funding for the Job Corps Program. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-071) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council consider and adopt Resolution No. 2025-071, supporting the Inland Empire Job Corps and urging continued federal funding for the Job Corps program. BACKGROUND: The Inland Empire Job Corps, located in San Bernardino, California, is a federally funded program that provides young adults with free education and vocational training. This program is part of a nationwide initiative to help underserved and economically disadvantaged youth gain meaningful employment through career and technical education. For decades, the Job Corps has served as a pipeline for a skilled and work-ready labor force, significantly contributing to the region's economic development and community resilience. Many Rancho Cucamonga residents have directly benefited from this program, securing stable employment and improving their quality of life. ANALYSIS: Recent federal budget developments have raised concerns about the future of Job Corps centers nationwide, including the Inland Empire location. The potential loss of this vital resource would have far-reaching consequences — undermining youth and young adult employment opportunities, weakening workforce readiness, and negatively impacting the region's economic development and long-term prosperity. This resolution formally communicates the City's position in support of the Inland Empire Job Corps and its continued federal funding. Pending adoption, the resolution will be shared with the Governor of California, members of the California State Legislature, and the California Congressional Delegation. By articulating the City's position to key decision-makers at both the state and federal level, this resolution seeks to influence policy discussions, reinforce the program's importance, and encourage legislative and budgetary actions that preserve and strengthen the Job Corps' role in workforce development. Page 455 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the resolution in support of the Job Corps Program. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item aligns with City Council's values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all and creating equitable opportunity to prosper by supporting a program that empowers underserved young adults through career training, fosters workforce development, and strengthens the region's economic resilience. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2025-071 Page 2 Page 456 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE INLAND EMPIRE JOB CORPS AND URGING CONTINUED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR THE JOB CORPSPROGRAM WHEREAS, the Inland Empire Job Corps, located in San Bernardino, California, provides vital career and technical education to young adults, equipping them with skills necessary for gainful employment; and WHEREAS, the Center has been instrumental in fostering a skilled workforce that contributes significantly to the local economy and community development; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the importance of the Job Corps program in offering life-changing opportunities to underserved and economically disadvantaged youth across diverse communities; and WHEREAS, recent federal actions have placed the continued operation of the Inland Empire Job Corps in jeopardy, threatening the livelihoods of its students and staff, as well as the economic stability of the region; and WHEREAS,the City of Rancho Cucamonga Council acknowledges the positive impact of the Inland Empire Job Corps on the community and the potential adverse effects that its closure would entail; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA hereby expresses its strong support for the continued operation and federal funding of the Inland Empire Job Corps and urges the Governor of California, the California State Legislature, and the California Congressional Delegation to advocate for the preservation and funding of the Job Corps program, recognizing its critical role in workforce development and community enrichment. A copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the Governor of California, the members of the California State Legislature, and the California Congressional Delegation to convey the City of Rancho Cucamonga's position on this matter. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _day of 2025. Page 457 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 1044 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING BIDDING LIMITS ON PUBLIC PROJECTS, AMENDING LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1044. BACKGROUND: The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was conducted at the Regular City Council meeting on July 16, 2025. Votes at first reading: AYES: Michael, Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Stickler ANALYSIS: Please refer to the July 16, 2025, City Council staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: Please refer to the July 16, 2025, City Council staff report. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Please refer to the July 16, 2025, City Council staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Ordinance No. 1044 Page 458 ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1044 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REVISING BIDDING LIMITS ON PUBLIC PROJECTS, AMENDING LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: A. RECITALS 1. The City has adopted a central purchasing system, which is codified in Chapter 3.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("Municipal Code") and that contains among others, provisions regarding contracts for professional services and public works. 2. It is in the public interest to amend Chapter 3.08 of the Municipal Code regarding contracts for services and public works to allow the City the greatest flexibility allowed under state law. 3. Maintenance and certain other kinds of services obtained by the City require compliance with provisions of the Labor Code, including payment of prevailing wages. Certain revisions to the City's purchasing procedures are necessary to ensure Labor Code compliance by providers of such services. 4. The Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Public Contract Code §22000, et seq. ("UPCCAA") bidding procedures, including bid amount thresholds, for public works contracting have been adopted by the City. Those amounts are revised by the Legislature from time to time. The City Council has determined that in order provide the City with the greatest flexibility in public works contracting, it is necessary revise the City's purchasing procedures to reflect recent and future revisions to the UPCCAA. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. ORDINANCE Section 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Section 2. Subsection 13.3 of Section 3.08.070 of Chapter 3.08 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "3. Contracts for maintenance services, "public works" as defined in Labor Code § 1720, and public projects, as defined in Public Contract Code § 22002, that exceed $1000, as such amount may be amended from time to time, normally require the payment of prevailing wages and compliance with Labor Code §§ 1720 through 1861." Ordinance No. XXX Page 1 of 4 Page 459 Section 3. Section 3.08.110 of Chapter 3.08 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "3.08.110. - Bidding for public projects. A. Public projects, as defined by the Public Contract Code § 22002 shall be bid, advertised, and awarded in accordance with the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act ("UPCCAA"), as it may be amended from time to time. B. Contracts for public projects shall be awarded pursuant to the bidding limitations established by the UPCCAA: 1. Public projects at or below the amount set forth in Public Contract Code § 22032(a) may be performed by City employees by force account, by negotiated contract, or by purchase order. 2. Public projects at or below the amount set forth in Public Contract Code § 22032(b) may be let to contract by informal bidding procedures as set forth in this section. 3. Public projects exceeding the amount set forth in Public Contract Code § 22032(c) shall, except as otherwise provided by law, be let to contract by formal bidding procedures. C. Public projects shall not be split or separated into smaller work orders for the purpose of evading the requirements of the UPCCAA. D. Contractors List. The City shall comply with the requirements of Public Contract Code § 22034. E. Informal Bidding. Public projects eligible for informal bidding under the UPCCAA may be let to contract as follows: 1. A notice inviting informal bids shall be circulated using one or both of the following alternatives: a. Notices inviting informal bids may be mailed, faxes, or emailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with paragraph D of this section. b. Notices inviting informal bids may be mailed to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with § 22036 of the Public Contract Code. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified at the discretion of the City; provided however, if the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting informal bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors. 2. The City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to award contracts at or below the dollar limitation applicable to informal bidding. 3. If all bids received through the informal bidding process exceed the amount set in Public Contract Code § 22032(b), the City Council may, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, award the contract, at or below the amount set forth in Public Contract Code § 22034(d), if it determines the cost estimate was reasonable. Ordinance No. XXX Page 2 of 4 Page 460 F. Formal bidding. Bidding on all public projects subject to formal bidding, shall done in accordance with the procedures set forth in Public Contract Code § 22037, et seq." Section 5. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ordinance No. XXX Page 3 of 4 Page 461 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this XXst day of Month 20xx. Ordinance No. XXX Page 4 of 4 Page 462 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Review Hearing to Consider a Proposed Master Plan for a 14.5-Acre Mixed-Use Development, Including Reductions in the Non- Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and Design and Site Planning Flexibility from the Form-Based Code for a Site Located in the Center 2 (CE-2)Zone at the Northeast Corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider the following: 1. Policy implications of a proposed legislative Master Plan request for a 14.5-acre site at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, which proposes, generally, a reduction to non-residential floor area ratio (FAR), building design standards, and site planning standards. 2. Staff also requests that the City Council provide preliminary comments on the proposed Master Plan to assist the applicant in determining whether to proceed with preparing a formal submittal. Any comments provided by the Council are non-binding and do not constitute project approval, imply future approval, or signal a commitment from staff to support the project in the future. BACKGROUND: In August 2021, the City Council adopted a policy to provide early feedback on applicant-initiated legislative requests, such as General Plan amendments, Specific Plans, Master Plans, and Development Code amendments, which are considered discretionary actions by the City Council. The current request is for a Master Plan. Per Council policy, early input is to be provided through an administrative hearing. A copy of this policy is included as Attachment 1. The intent of the policy is to allow applicants to gauge Council interest and policy direction before investing significant resources in the development of a legislative request and related entitlements. This early input helps ensure alignment with the City's goals and priorities from the outset. Following the adoption of the City's updated General Plan on December 15, 2021,the City Council approved a comprehensive update to the Development Code, including the creation of a Form- Page 463 Based Code (FBC). The FBC establishes place-based, objective development standards consistent with recent state housing laws. While intended to provide clarity and predictability, these standards may not account for unique site constraints such as irregular lot shapes, topography, or access issues. The Master Plan process provides a framework for the coordinated, comprehensive planning of a subarea of the City and may be pursued to accomplish one or more of the following objectives: • Protect a unique environmental, historical, architectural, or other significant site feature that cannot be adequately protected through the application of an existing zone; • Allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be achieved under current zoning or due to the constraints of existing development standards; • Further the implementation of specific goals and policies of the City as provided in the General Plan; • Look beyond the boundaries of a particular property to proactively address broader issues such as circulation, drainage, and neighborhood compatibility; or • Provide flexibility for developments that require alternatives to conventional zoning regulations in order to address special or unique site characteristics or community needs. The applicant, Sares Regis Group, is considering a future development at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street and is requesting initiation of the Master Plan process, pursuant to Section 17.22.020.B.1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The potential project includes a 14.5-acre mixed-use project designed to serve as a gateway and catalyst for future development. ANALYSIS: Project Site Context The project site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, near the City's southern boundary. As one of Rancho Cucamonga's most prominent intersections and a key regional entry point, this location has long been envisioned as a southern gateway to the City. Its strategic setting—offering high visibility and nearby freeway access—presents a unique opportunity to strengthen the City's identity through landmark urban development. The site is designated City Center in the General Plan and is located within an identified activity node, emphasizing its importance as a hub for community, commercial, and transit-oriented activity. It is zoned Center 2 (CE2) under the City's Form-Based Code (Article VIII), which encourages high-intensity, mixed-use development with active frontages, strong pedestrian connectivity, and thoughtful transitions in building scale. Additionally,the site is subject to a Corridor Frontage Overlay along Haven Avenue and 4th Street, which imposes specific frontage and form requirements aimed at promoting an attractive, walkable, and active street scene along these key corridors. This frontage type emphasizes active ground-floor uses, transparency, and minimal setbacks—principles that play a critical role in shaping the public realm and must be balanced against the project's proposed deviations. Page 2 Page 464 Project Overview As noted, the applicant, Sares Regis Group (SRG), is requesting initiation of the Master Plan process, pursuant to Section 17.22.020.B.1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, for a potential future 14.5-acre mixed-use project. The prospective proposal includes: • A five-story, 610-unit for rent units wrapped around a multi-story parking structure, including 6,000 square feet of live-work units along Haven Avenue; • 13,500 square feet of restaurant space across three single-story buildings at the corner of Haven Avenue and 41h Street; • A five-story, 160-key hotel with integrated dining and conference facilities along 4th Street. The preliminary plan features a network of pedestrian-oriented open spaces, including a 20-foot- wide landscaped paseo connecting internal areas to 4th Street. At the prominent corner of Haven and 4th, the project proposes a redesigned gateway element that includes enhanced landscaping, public art, lighting, and City signage, emphasizing the site's significance as a civic entry point. Together, the uses and design aim to activate the site day and night while providing much-needed housing and hospitality offerings in a key urban location. AT.I� ram. , ' ,R t♦ ! -- - - I• l��l, r do It rl 'r 0 �4 r Figure 1 —Project Area Page 3 Page 465 I o I i Na�lw3vtlgi _ 4 s C3 C z` I I ��.I J a ❑ z Q Ekt 'F �a 5 o FOURTH STREET Figure 2- Conceptual Site Plan Page 4 Page 466 "OFF ■ Mir r r '� ! Figure 3— Conceptual Rendering Summary of the Proposed Legislative Changes Some of the policy considerations that the Council might consider as part of their initial feedback on the subject project may include neighborhood impacts, economic development, and whether the use is appropriate for the site. The following section evaluates the applicant's requests for site-specific standards within the site area. These requests aim to balance the project's unique design and operational needs with the City's broader vision for high-quality, walkable mixed-use development. To support a focused policy discussion, the applicant's originally proposed list of 15 requested deviations have been grouped into three categories for ease of reference: Non-residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which addresses overall use intensity and mix; Building Design Standards, which relates to frontage treatments and ground-floor activation; and Site Planning Standards, which involve block configuration, circulation, and open space layout. The pros and cons that follow highlight key policy considerations for the City Council in determining whether the proposed legislative changes appropriately support public benefits while remaining consistent with the City's planning goals. Given the project's highly visible location, staff has included a fourth category—Gateway Vision for Haven Avenue and 4th Street—in the policy discussion. This consideration reflects the site's strategic role as a key entry point into the City Center area and the importance of ensuring that the project supports the City's broader goals for design quality, identity, and sense of place along this corridor. 1. Reduction in Non-Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Code Requirement: The CE2 zone requires a non-residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) between 1.0 and 2.0, as outlined in Article VIII of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. This requirement is intended to foster a mixed-use environment by ensuring that each development Page 5 Page 467 contributes meaningfully to both housing and employment, commercial services, and public activation. For a 14.5-acre site, this standard equates to a minimum of 631,620 square feet of non-residential development. Project Request: The applicant proposes a total of approximately 107,000 square feet of non- residential development across the site, including a hotel, three commercial buildings, and live/work units. This results in a total site FAR of approximately 0.17—significantly below the required minimum. Pros: The proposed mix of uses places a strong emphasis on a cohesive development anchored by a hotel and restaurant uses at a highly visible corner, which may foster a sense of identity and activity despite the lower square footage. The project also delivers a substantial number of residential units, which supports local and regional housing goals in alignment with the City's General Plan and Housing Element. Strategically locating commercial uses at the intersection of Haven Avenue and 4th Street could create an activated node that complements surrounding development. The hotel use may enhance economic development outcomes through transient occupancy taxes and job creation, which are not fully captured in FAR metrics but still advance citywide fiscal and land use objectives. Cons: The proposed FAR is well below the minimum required and may be inconsistent with the intended scale and mix envisioned for the CE2 zone. By significantly reducing the amount of non- residential square footage, the project risks limiting long-term employment opportunities, commercial vibrancy, and activity-generating uses that are central to the Form-Based Code and General Plan vision. 2. Design Modifications Code Requirement: The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, along with the Corridor Frontage Overlay applied to both Haven Avenue and 4th Street, emphasizes street-activating design principles. These include requirements for active ground-floor uses, continuous building frontages, minimal setbacks, and direct entryways to buildings. Specifically, the Code prohibits residential and live-work units at ground level adjacent to the public right-of-way, in order to preserve the vibrancy and commercial character of street frontages. Project Request: The applicant is requesting multiple deviations from these requirements, primarily related to the five-story apartment building fronting Haven Avenue. These include permitting ground-level residential and live-work units along the street, reducing the required percentage of built frontage, and allowing courtyards to serve as the primary entrance points to buildings rather than direct entries from the sidewalk.Additionally, the project requests exceptions to standards for vertical articulation (i.e., breaks in building mass exceeding 400 feet), modifications to allowable fagade and entry types, and reductions in the minimum height for residential floor entries to improve accessibility and design flexibility. These requests are accompanied by the proposed placement of one-story commercial pad buildings at the 4th and Haven corner, which departs from the Form-Based Code's intent for prominent, continuous building massing at key intersections to establish a unified and active urban edge. While this proposed layout creates opportunities for public plazas and visual openness, it may not achieve the strong architectural statement and urban enclosure envisioned for this highly visible civic gateway. Page 6 Page 468 Pros: Allowing ground-floor residential and live-work units may support an active streetscape outside of typical business hours and enhance safety through increased presence. Courtyards and outdoor spaces could offer informal gathering areas and improve the pedestrian experience. Flexibility in entry placement and frontage design may better accommodate accessibility and layout needs, while alternative approaches to fagade articulation—such as varied materials and massing—can maintain visual interest and urban character without strict adherence to dimensional standards. These adjustments provide design flexibility while still supporting core planning objectives. Cons: Permitting residential and live-work units at the ground level on street frontages may reduce the level of commercial activity and limit the long-term potential for active retail uses, which is a primary goal of the CE-2 zone and the Corridor Overlay. A reduced percentage of built frontage and deviations from fagade length articulation requirements may undermine the intended fine- grain urban fabric envisioned in the Form-Based Code, especially along long block frontages. The configuration of the commercial pad buildings—while offering open space—also interrupts the strong, continuous massing expected at key intersections, particularly in areas identified as civic gateways. Allowing reduced elevation for residential entries from the standard 30-inch height may compromise privacy and weaken a key urban design principle intended to provide separation between private residences and active public sidewalks. 3. Site Plan and Block Configuration Code Requirement: The Form-Based Code requires a minimum of three different building types on sites over six acres to promote architectural variety and avoid a monotonous built environment. It also includes standards for build-to-lines, setbacks, paseo orientation, and park placement, all aimed at fostering pedestrian-scale development, active streetscapes, and walkable connections. Project Request: The applicant proposes only two building types, which do not fully align with the defined typologies in the Code. Requests also include flexibility from build-to-line and setback standards for the hotel and commercial buildings to allow for plazas and outdoor dining areas. The project proposes surface parking within the required 50-foot setback for the hotel drop-off area and seeks to reduce parking stall dimensions from 10x20 feet to 9x18 feet to support higher residential density. In terms of open space and circulation, the required mid-block pocket park is proposed to be relocated to the prominent Haven/4th corner as a civic gateway. The paseo, intended by the FBC to span between public streets, is proposed to connect the internal residential area to the commercial uses and 4th Street only, breaking the desired through-block connection pattern. Pros: The requested flexibility allows the applicant to tailor the site plan to the specific needs of the project while still supporting many of the Code's urban design goals. Larger setbacks for hotel and restaurant areas create opportunities for outdoor dining, better pedestrian comfort, and a more gracious streetscape. Locating the pocket park at a prominent corner could help establish a visual identity for the project and act as a landmark gateway for both the development and the broader community. The modified paseo layout still promotes walkability within the site and links residential and commercial components. Reducing parking stall sizes aligns with trends in urban development that prioritize density and walkability over traditional suburban parking standards. Cons: Limiting the number of building types and increasing block sizes could lead to a lack of visual variety and reduce the urban character envisioned in the CE-2 zone. Deviating from build- Page 7 Page 469 to-line standards and allowing parking within the required setback may weaken the pedestrian orientation of the project, particularly at the hotel drop-off area where surface parking would dominate the frontage. The relocation of the pocket park to a corner—while visually prominent— may reduce its usability for interior residents and shift it away from its intended role as a central green space. The General Plan and Form-Based Code have long envisioned a significant building mass at this corner as a gateway to the City. The revised paseo configuration may fall short of the intended street-to-street connectivity, and smaller parking stalls could pose operational challenges, particularly for larger vehicles. While each deviation may have a practical justification, their cumulative effect could diminish the fine-grain, walkable urbanism the Code is designed to achieve. 4. Gateway Vision for Haven Avenue and 41" Street In addition to be an activity node in the General Plan, the Council has maintained a vision for the gateway entrance to the city from the south along Haven Avenue. Development was expected to provide presence closer to the corner. The project on the northwest corner of Haven and 4t" developed in the early 2000's includes two multi story office buildings with prominent visual interest at the corner. They are set back, and there is a vacant 1-acre pad at the corner that was designed for a future restaurant that is currently undeveloped. In the proposed master plan, the residential building and the hotel are located further away from the corner, with the lower elevation pad buildings providing that first visual for the project as you travel north on Haven Ave. The hotel and residential buildings proposed will likely be taller than the buildings to the west, but the corner will not have as strong a vertical element. Economic Development Strategy 3.3 desires to attract restaurants to the City that are destination driven. While the proposed restaurants at the corner will meet the siting needs of any future users, the currently proposed configuration of 3 restaurants with an average footprint of 4,500 square feet is unlikely to attract the type of restaurants the city is seeking. Our Economic Development team has had numerous conversations with many high-end restaurant groups and nearly all our existing restaurant spaces are too small; many are seeking a minimum of 10,000 square feet and in some cases, upwards of 15,000 to 18,000 square feet. Most, if not all, are searching for surface parking lots, as opposed to structured parking. Higher end restaurants with corner visibility are anticipated to be in high demand with their proximity to existing professional offices, hotel visitors, Cucamonga Station and the HART District, the Toyota Center, Ontario Airport and Interstate 10 larger restaurant buildings will attract the desired restaurant uses and the scale will further enhance the corner of the site and a key entrance into the city from the south. In addition, larger building will increase the presence of the project at the corner. A final consideration for the Council is the long-term nature of Master Plans and the uncertainty surrounding their implementation. While Master Plans are intended to guide coordinated development over time, the entitlement does not guarantee construction, nor does it ensure that all phases will be completed in a timely manner. Some projects move forward quickly, while others remain partially unbuilt for many years. For example, the now-retired Town Center Master Plan at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue was largely developed by 2005, but a key seven-acre parcel remained vacant for decades. If the Master Plan had still been in effect, that site would have been subject to outdated standards no longer aligned with the City's current General Plan. Granting a long-term legislative entitlement can inadvertently lock in development parameters that may no longer reflect evolving community needs or policy direction by the time construction occurs. Page 8 Page 470 Next Steps This discussion provides the City Council with an opportunity to offer early policy guidance on the proposed Master Plan before the applicant proceeds with formal entitlement applications. Based on the feedback received, the applicant may revise the plan to better align with the City's vision and policy direction. If the applicant decides to move forward through the development review process and submit a formal application, staff will continue to work with the applicant and return at a future date with a formal Master Plan application and any associated development requests for Planning Commission and City Council consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. The item is presented solely for the early policy input and does not represent or guarantee future project approval. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The applicant's request for a Master Plan, considered prior to the formal submission, directly supports the City Council's Core Value of "Working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders." By engaging in this early stage of the process, the City demonstrates its commitment to fostering collaboration, encouraging innovation, and promoting thoughtful long-range planning. This proactive approach to evaluating a unique development opportunity enables the City to address potential challenges and opportunities effectively, ensuring alignment with community values. The Master Plan process provides a structured framework that balances flexibility with high standards for design quality, consistency, and sustainability, ultimately advancing the City's long-term vision for a vibrant, integrated community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - City Council Policy on Master Plan Applications Page 9 Page 471 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: City Policy Pertaining to Early Feedback on General Plan Amendments, Planned Community, Master Plan and Specific Plan Amendments, and Development Code Amendments. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive, file and adopt the attached policy on providing early Council feedback on General Plan amendments, Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan Amendments, or Development Code Amendments. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the city, Specific Plans, Planned Communities, and master plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code or as a bridge between the General Plan and the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. Under the Development Code, only the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Director, or a property owner may initiate applications for these legislative amendments. In many cases, property owners (or their agents) who apply for projects that may require multiple entitlements spend several years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council has any interest in considering the necessary legislative change for the project. ANALYSIS: While the City typically receives limited applications for legislative changes such as General Plan amendments, there are currently several such applications undergoing review by the Planning Department. These types of legislative approvals can only be granted by the City Council and have separate and distinct policy implications apart from the merits of a project. In order, however, for an application to be considered by the City Council (under present policy and process), that application must first undergo review and analysis by City staff, potential consideration by the Design Review Committee, environmental analysis under CEQA, and consideration by the Planning Commission. This process can easily take up to 18+ months and require an applicant to spend thousands of dollars for design and studies, all before they have any understanding whether the City Council has an interest in approving such a legislative change, which may be necessary before any other entitlements needed for a project may be approved. In practice, staff is finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty for the applicant and further complicates the development review process for city staff, particularly in situations with competing interests. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 472 There is another alternative; some cities allow for an applicant to seek preliminary feedback from the city council in connection with the merits of a General Plan amendment or other legislative changes. After the Council provides its feedback on the proposed legislative amendment, the applicant can decide whether to pursue the legislative amendment, and the other entitlements for the applicant's proposed project,with the Council's preliminary policy considerations in mind. This opportunity provides the applicant with more information about whether the proposed project is likely to be successful after the application has been processed by staff. Rancho Cucamonga's past practice, dating back to the 1980's, was to request initial authorization by the City Council prior to beginning any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan that included more than one parcel or project (i.e., Town Square Master Plan). The City abandoned this policy in 2012 intending to streamline the development review process. While it may streamline the process, the new practice also causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review, in some cases actually complicating the process. Under the new process, a detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide a list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating the pre-application review is not an approval nor a guarantee of approval, that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against, and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis become available in the future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the intent of the preliminary review process is informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. After the administrative hearing, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. It is important to note that an initial City Council direction on a legislative change is not an approval and does not guarantee an approval. It would not involve any consideration of a particular project. Put more simply, it would only give the Council an opportunity to consider the policy implications Page 2 Page 331 Page 473 of changing the General Plan, Specific Plan, Master Plan, Community Plan, or Development Code, as the case may be. Some of the policy considerations that the Council might consider as part of this initial feedback may include neighborhood impacts, economic development, and whether the use is appropriate for the site. This change creates an opportunity to provide staff and applicants with such feedback before thousands of hours, dollars, and years are spent processing an application. As such, staff recommends re-establishing the City's prior policy to bring requests for all General Plan amendments, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code changes requested by owners of real property or their authorized representatives to the City Council for an initial round of feedback. An applicant would still be required to conduct the same CEQA analysis and go through the same development and environmental review if it decides to pursue its applications further. This policy will not apply to any current applications that have been deemed complete. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This policy helps realize the City Council's vision for creating a world class community and the City Council value of"Equitable prosperity for all" by helping to identify and remove barriers within the City's Development Review process. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Legislative Changes Review Policy Page 3 Page 332 Page 474 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director FROM: Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: Legislative Changes and Amendments Policy PURPOSE: To re-establish a policy for initiating General Plan amendments, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code amendments requested by builders and developers. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the city, Specific Plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. The City's past practice, dating back to the 1980s, was to request authorization by the City Council to initiate any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community, or Master Plan that includes more than one parcel or project (i.e., Town Square Master Plan). This policy allowed for discussion of the pros and cons of such requests and consideration for larger policy implications. The City abandoned this practice in 2012 with the intent of streamlining the development review process. However, currently, staff is finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review. It results in applicants spending many years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council may even desire considering such legislative changes. POLICY: An application for a legislative change, such as a General Plan amendment, that is initiated by a private property owner shall be recommended for an administrative hearing before the City Council as the first step in the Development Review process. The Planning Director shall schedule a preliminary review hearing before the City Council once the applicant has provided enough information about the proposed amendment and related project to permit the Planning Director to prepare a staff report for the hearing. This information shall include, but is not limited to, a statement explaining the applicant's reason for requesting the General Plan amendment, the proposed change in land use designations on the parcel(s), the project's proposed uses and density, and any other project parameters associated with the amendment that are deemed necessary by the Planning Director. A detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide a list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating the pre-application review is not an approval nor a guarantee of approval, that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against, and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis become available in the ATT%HeI I§yT 1 Page 475 future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the intent of the preliminary review process is informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. If an applicant does not want to go to City Council for the preliminary review and insists on a full hearing on the project merits, they shall sign an At Risk Waiver acknowledging they had the opportunity to go to the City Council on the legislative change but chose to decline. That document will become part of the entitlement package and administrative record. After the administrative hearing, alternatively, after signing an At Risk Waiver, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. If the City Council's input is not positive, staff shall use the City Council's feedback to problem solve with the applicant and work on a redesigned or different project. In such case, the Applicant shall be welcome to an additional review with the City Council to determine if a revised or alternative proposal might be a better solution. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. The City shall not charge a fee for the administrative hearing and will expedite scheduling a hearing date. The Planning Department shall provide the applicant at least ten (10) days written notice of the hearing date and time. Page 2 Page 334 Page 476 J�3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director FROM: Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: Legislative Changes and Amendments Policy PURPOSE: To re-establish the policy for initiating General Plan amendment, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code amendments requested by builders and developers. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the City, Specific Plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. The city's past practice, dating back to the 1980's, was to request authorization by the City Council to initiate any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan that includes more than one parcel or project (i.e. Town Square Master Plan). This allowed a discussion of the pros and cons of such requests and larger policy implications that should be considered. This practice was abandoned in 2012 with the intention of streamlining the development review process. However, in practice, we are finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review. It results in applicants spending many years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council may even have an appetite for considering such legislative changes. POLICY: An application for a legislative change, such as a General Plan amendment, that is initiated by a private property owner shall be recommended for an administrative hearing before the City Council as the first step in the Development Review process. The Planning Director shall schedule a preliminary review hearing before the City Council once the applicant has provided enough information about the proposed amendment and related project to permit the Planning Director to prepare a staff report for the hearing. This information shall include, but is not limited to, a statement explaining the applicant's reason for requesting the General Plan amendment, the proposed change in land use designations on the parcel(s), the project's proposed uses and density, and any other project parameters associated with the amendment that are deemed necessary by the Planning Director. A detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating this this pre- application review is not an approval, not a guarantee of approval, and that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis Page 335 Page 477 become available in the future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment, rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the preliminary review process is intended to be informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. After the administrative hearing, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. If the City Council's input is not positive, staff shall use the City Council's feedback to problem solve with the applicant and work or a redesigned or different project. In such case, the Applicant shall be welcome to an additional review with the City Council to determine if a revised or different proposal might be a better solution. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. This policy is not meant to apply to Development Agreements. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. The City shall not charge a fee for the administrative hearing and will expedite scheduling a hearing date. The Planning Department shall provide the applicant at least 10 days' written notice of the hearing date and time. Page 2 Page 336 Page 478 Rempel Mixed- Use August 20 , 2025 City Council 00, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Location COD Base Line Road Al wr �I c �- Project > r a Site (m, Bn T.4 pF N Q $ ; Ry r�ftRl CITY OF RANCHO Site Plan C Live Worc(3-Story) 0 7.8 Live Wore,(2-Storyl Townhomes(3-Storyl 1 1 8 Townhomes 12-Story) 1 1 33 1 1 i 5.1 2 5 TY 4 25.1 2 29' 26 Y WATER QUALITY 1 39 21 3 21 7- n 3' 27 5' 2.!f 4 I r //tom -1 1 i 1 rJ 1 I 1 1 VVJ � k I \ TL RAKS ORMER IRANSFORMER _ 27.5' 9'�'� __ _ + - 1� ____________________ _ 'WATER QUA11[Y TRASH ENCLOSURE RE51dE IOR ExR EMDE V LJ TING SENNTIAI. • N4 Nor- ` . :. . ■i '� ff A a �� �fi � .d Ili a �� fal . ■Y\ . �\ Ail . 1�■ Win\ . LINK All i, 11111 Lu_ = � _ � I I 11 I III _ li u L1111 s l ii - .1111 Igwlw ili-.= 06 I'mu'l hus■l,11 lism� -11anM _ �. ► __may Amri „ 7� t„ giant * 5 k 1 R �. ''' Suxieslnteriars .. .,.. .•. ,.�":11�3 - FF. A!iDWMWj lu r. t EN OF I Compliance with NG3 Development Standards COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Standard Required .•. -• Complies Residential Density • du/ac Yes Lot Coverage(max.) 75 percent 42 percent Yes Total Stories(max.) • - stories Building Height40 feetfeet - Open SpaceI public open space type Paseo Yes Third StoMTM."M 30 Feet • Floor Area Ratio(min-max) . Ground Floor Nonresidential Use Height(min) 12 Feet - • Primary Building Depth (max) 50 Feet • Transparency,Ground Floor (Min/Max) �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r Master Plan A -11-T r I I 'I' ETIWANUA ALTA LOMA / CENTRAL fti! ---- - NORTH 1} - ____ ASTS E CENTRAL �,• CVCAMDHGA 1 I 4 J SOUTH VTHE 5T Neighborhood Corridor NEIGHBORHOOD CORRIDOR Purpose & Intent To provide for more intense development in an active, pedestrian-oriented, and transit-ready environment within certain segments of major corridors adjacent to low and medium density neighborhoods. FIGURE FA-7 FOCUS AREA 6: ALTA LOMA TOWN CENTER IN 7 Exisfing Slieel i Recommended Street ao rs f i ••••"1 1 1 ■, r Recommended Alley/Drive L` ,. - ■ Fags All Q Recommended Connection SIR Multipurpose Troll Trailhead I �� �� GOP Recommended Park Plazo rt� I f � �� � �� Lomita Ct Tronsit Priority Streetl Bike Priority Street a 4 rl "Main Street" Lffilh, Recommended Developmen!Pattern ■ r �� �� PAN ♦ '� ' I� ff INS IS E �* ■ i � •� ■ Name q Ic a n oil -0 sum am goo ;A 0 E. L ._, ■ , � u NMI W NO M. r � r 7 f IN h f �� I ; yea` 1I'd - - ""Diogrtrrii is-shown for r11u5[rQ6ve purposes only. CITY O RANCHO Community Concerns • Ruby Ave extension • Traffic/Parking • Building Height • Privacy/Window Placement • Land Use Environmental Assessment The project qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption Planning Commission July 23, 2025 • 6 public comment speakers • Recommend approval to the City Council Recommendation • Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt: • Resolution 25-65 - Approval of the project. • Staff recommends that the City Council adopt: • Resolution 25-66 - Approval of the Summary Vacation of Non-Vehicular Access Rights CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S. DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director Bond Mendez, CPD, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of a Master Plan, Tentative Tract Map, Design Review and Minor Exception—True Life Companies-Site Plan and Architectural Review of a Mixed-Use Project Comprised of 50 Multi-Family Units Including 10 Live/Work Units, and a Tentative Tract Map for Condominium Purposes Located on Approximately 2.3 Acres of Land Within the Neighborhood General 3(NG3)Zone, Located on the Southwest Corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; APN: 0208-432-16. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under CEQA Section 15332 (SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, Minor Exception DRC2025-00055). (RESOLUTION NOS. 2025-065 AND 2025-066) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the proposed Master Plan, Design Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Minor Exception to develop 50 multi-family units, including 10 live/work units, and a tentative tract map for condominium purposes; and Staff recommends that the City Council adopt and authorize the recording of the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of non-vehicular access rights. BACKGROUND: The project site is a 2.3-acre lot located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue. The lot is currently developed with a single-family home and ancillary structures which are proposed to be demolished. The site slopes from north to south with dimensions of approximately 240 feet (east to west) and 486 feet (north to south). The site is surrounded by existing single-family residential development to the west and south, senior care living to the east, and commercial uses to the north across Base Line Road. The street frontage is currently improved with sidewalk, landscaped parkway, curb and gutter, and an existing bike lane. The City Council held a preliminary review hearing on July 19, 2023, for the consideration of a proposed Master Plan development for a mixed-use project that would include site-specific development standards including a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) lower than the standard under the Development Code, see attached Attachment 6. The project does not meet the required non- residential FAR of 0.4-0.6 for the Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) zone. This standard would require the project area, at 2.3 acres, to provide between approximately 40,000 to 60,000 square feet of nonresidential floor area. Instead, the developer had proposed a possible alternative of 10 live/work units which cumulatively total approximately 3,000 square feet of non-residential floor area, which when factored against the site size of the 2.3-acre site equals an approximate 0.03 FAR. In this case, the applicant cited the 0.4-0.6 FAR requirement for non-residential floor area Page 479 as burdensome considering the small size of the lot. The recommendation was to move forward with the Master Plan development including the reduced FAR design. Upon review of the formal submittal of the development application, the applicant has also included deviations from the Development Code including zoning and building type standards, building entrance and fagade standards, and a Minor Exception request for reduced upper story setbacks. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 23, 2025, to consider the project. The commission received written comments and testimony from the public at the hearing. For specific details, the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are included as Attachment 3. The Planning Commission voted 3-0-2 recommending approval of the project to the City Council. Aa ra s Sj, ¢ - Base Line Road Project Site t nrr a 4nw-Ril rrtwnn►'•1... . Figure 1: Project Location Land Uses The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General 3 NG3 North Commercial Traditional Town Center Center 1 CE1 South Single-Family Suburban Neighborhood Very Low Low L Residential East Residential Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) Care Facility West Single-Family Suburban Neighborhood Very Low Low L Residential ANALYSIS: General Plan and Zoning Designations The project site is within the Neighborhood Corridor general plan land use designation which allows for and encourages infill development with a mix of land uses. The project is within the Page 2 of 12 Page 480 Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) zone which allows for mixed-use development subject to the design standards specific to the NG3 zone including but not limited to building types, building and entrance fagade, and public open space. This project proposes infill development with a mix of land uses, building types, entrances and facades, and public open space, consistent with the general plan and zoning designations. Further, the project site is also located within the Alta Loma Town Center Focus Area (Focus Area 6). The Alta Loma Town Center is intended to be a highly active and attractive community activity center reflective of traditional development patterns wherein activity centers and streets are improved to create more human-scale, comfortable and walkable community gathering places. Connectivity and walkability improvements within this area are envisioned so that residents from surrounding neighborhoods may walk, bike or ride a horse to existing and future commercial amenities. Accordingly, the project proposes a mixed-use human-scale development that promotes pedestrian connectivity to the existing surrounding single-family neighborhood and residential care facility, and from the commercial uses located north of Base Line Road. The project site is also within walking distance, approximately 400 feet, to the Pacific Electric Trail, and the street contains an existing bike lane along Base Line Road. Architecture, Building Plotting, and Site Layout The project proposes five 10-unit buildings, and each building is three stories maximum with the last unit of each building on the west end dropped down to two-stories. The proposed buildings are designed in a rowhouse configuration and do not exceed the maximum 40 feet in height and are of a size and scale that does not overwhelm the adjacent public streets. The building massing includes wall facade offsets, projection, and roof plane articulation, creating visual interest to each building elevation. The building that sits closest to Base Line Road is designed with 10 live/work units to include ground-floor commercial space for an active street frontage of the project site. These units include entrances to the individual residential floor space above the commercial space. The remaining 40 townhouse units are designed exclusively as residential units. The units closest to Base Line Road face the public street which provides direct visibility to the public way, providing an extra level of security (i.e., eyes on the street). -------------------- ----------r"-- Clive Wor<I3-StorY1 I J l � - I71' =Uve Wa 12-5layl 3�a _ I C T—h—13-Story] l—M—es 12Sforyl I I i I 1 I .i. nr.i 1 - � LJ • - • I. . .Y� [RQ a TR 4-1 I I . e / WATER Ol1ANT� l UASN ENCLOSURE tl - 1%TI G F SFNpR RFSb FNIIN Figure 2: Site Layout Page 3 of 12 Page 481 The applicant has chosen a contemporary architectural theme. Design elements include tile roofs, cementitious board and batten, cementitious lap siding, stucco siding, vinyl windows, and metal sectional garage doors, with contrasting trim colors and door finishes to reinforce the specific architectural style. The materials are carried to each elevation to emphasize the chosen architectural theme and building articulation. LT.ER'ICAL ARTICIILITIO CHANCE 11 ROOD=ORv '0"*- LI-VERTICAL AKCUVMON BALCONIES AI HL UPPER LEVELS I . e +Fgl4 it =a .. FRONT .,. Figure 3: Live/Work Building Frontage along Base Line Road U U - - FRONT Figure 4: Residential Rowhouse Building All streets within the interior of the project will be private and maintained by a homeowner's association, however, they will be open to the public. Access into the project will be provided by street connections from Base Line Road at the north end of the project and Ruby Avenue from the south end of the project. All access will be non-obstructed vehicular and pedestrian access points. The project will not include access gates but will be designed as a connected neighborhood, consistent with the General Plan and Alta Loma Town Center Focus Area. Page 4 of 12 Page 482 OF Figure 5: Live/Work building along Base Line Road. Figure 6: Live/Work building along Base Line Road. Page 5 of 12 Page 483 ENIARGEM T'A EHLARGEAENT'A' ENLPR6RIE H' THIS SHEET THI5 MEET THIS SHEET 113 E` J Q ssrk , LIE I I s e � RUBY AVE?9 la O O QPRwarE�E�o � � II 0 0 _ 0. e AMI=THYST AVE C Figure 7: Landscape Plan Compliance with Development Standards The project is within a form-based zone, Neighborhood General 3 (NG3), and is required to meet compliance with the zone and building standards, building entrance and facades, public open space, and land use standards. The applicant has chosen to develop the site with the Rowhouse Building type including the live/work units and the shopfront facade for the building that fronts Base Line Road, and a porch front with the remaining four townhouse buildings. The project includes a paseo for the required public open space and as previously mentioned, the project includes both multi-family structures and mixed-use structures specifically with the live/work land use to meet the non-residential requirement for the NG3 zone. The project is compliant with most required development standards in the NG3 zone, including but not limited to parking, open space, landscaping and recreational space. The applicant is requesting some deviations as presented below. Minor Exception The applicant has applied for a minor exception for a reduced upper story setback requirement. Pursuant to 17.130.030.K.2 (Massing Adjacent to Lower-Density Residential), when abutting a single-family residential zone, the third and fourth stories must be stepped back a minimum 30 feet from the property line or a minimum eight feet from the ground floor side or rear facade, whichever is greater. The project proposes five 3-story buildings with 10 units in each building, resulting in 5 units at the west end of the project at the required minimum 10-foot setback. The applicant has reduced the height of all five end units to two-stories. Each building complies with the minimum required 10-foot setback from the western interior property line except the third story of each building is required to be setback 30 feet from the property line. The applicant is requesting a 10% reduction, up to 3 feet, which would result in a 27-foot setback. The reduced setback would only apply to a portion of the unit and not the full dimension of the west facing facade of the third story. The units have been designed to where the reduced setback allows for the interior staircase to reach the 3rd floor and the staircase landing at the 3rd floor, and for a bedroom walk-in closet. The minor exception would only apply to the residential rowhouse Page 6 of 12 Page 484 buildings as the live/work building is in compliance with the third story setback. West Property Line > IFeet Proposed Y J !� 10 feet it i ti Figure 8: Townhouse Building, North Elevation Page 7 of 12 Page 485 LJ �BE M_2 West Property Line 0 30 feet BATH o �, --�,r•--.-� red vexr -AL, �S . HALL EEI F, i 0 27.5 feet M.3ATH u n M.B=7kM. LII I ' } 10 feet ----------F_ 0 Outline of 2-story UNIT 2X,1 UNIT 4.1 end unit Figure 9: Floor plan illustrating reduced third floor setback Master Plan As previously discussed, this project site is within a form-based code which requires specific zone and building standards, building entrance and facades, public open space, and land use standards. The applicant has applied for a master plan to establish site-specific development standards pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.020 (Master Plan). Page 8 of 12 Page 486 Proposed Master Plan Development Standards Required Proposed Floor Area Ratio (min-max) 0.4 - 0.6 0.03 FAR Ground Floor Nonresidential 12 Feet 10 Feet Use Height min Primary Building Depth (max) 50 Feet 55-6" Transparency, Ground Floor 70% / 90% 45% Min/Max In summary, the project includes a request for a master plan to request site-specific development standards for nonresidential floor area (FAR), ground floor non-residential use height, primary building depth, and ground floor transparency to be approved by the City Council. The purpose of a master plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city to accomplish specific objectives including to allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zone or due to constraints of existing development standards. In addition to these referenced Development Code regulations, the City has also established a policy on master plans and other legislative actions. Pursuant to the Development Code and the City's master plan policy, staff notes that the City Council held a policy discussion on July 19, 2023 wherein the Council specifically discussed policy implications for allowing deficient non- residential floor area standards for parcels which meet certain criteria, specifically for lots which are less than 3-acres and which are not located within a frontage overlay along a primary corridor. During their discussion, the Council generally expressed support for allowing deficient non- residential FAR in such circumstances, on a case-by-case basis. Staff notes that the project site meets these same narrow criteria as previously discussed by City Council as the site is less than 3-acres (2.3 acres) and is not located within a frontage overlay. Therefore, in this case, staff supports the applicant's requested reduction in non-residential FAR. Staff's determination is supported by the fact that while the project is deficient in meeting the code required 0.4 to 0.6 non-residential FAR, the project proposes to still provide a cumulative 3,065 square feet of non- residential space. In addition to the reduced FAR, the applicant is proposing a reduced ground floor retail height from 12 feet to 10 feet, and a reduced ground floor transparency to 45% total. These deviations apply to the live/work building that fronts Base Line Road and were discovered during the formal review process after Council had rendered their opinion on the reduced FAR. For the residential rowhouse buildings, the requested deviation proposed is to increase the building depth from 50 feet maximum to 55-6" maximum for an enhanced design including wall and fagade articulation and projections. Further, staff notes that the project site is surrounded by a mix of existing residential, commercial, retail, and office land uses that are readily accessible to future project residents and commercial tenants. Due to these circumstances, and despite not providing code-compliant nonresidential floor area, ground floor residential use height, primary building depth, and ground floor transparency, the project would implement the City's vision in the NG3 zone by introducing a medium density (22 du/ac) mixed-use development along a pedestrian and bicycle priority corridor. Inclusive of the request to approve a master plan, the project does not conflict with the General Plan or the land use designation of the project site as the Neighborhood Corridor land use designation encourages infill development with a mix of land uses. The proposed residential and commercial land uses will complement and be compatible with the surrounding area's character, Page 9 of 12 Page 487 which consists of a mix of residential, retail, office, and commercial land uses. Further, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.020.A.3, project development would also help implement and further several goals and policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, including the ability to provide complete places (LC1.1), ensuring the quality of public space (LC- 1.3), and the provision of compatible development (LC-1.11). The additional housing units will also assist the City in reaching its State housing Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) outlined in the Housing Element. Tentative Tract Map The tentative tract map is requested for 50 condominium lots resulting in each unit on its own lot. The project site will remain as one parcel. As a condition of approval, the applicant is required to file a final map which is to be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. As part of their preparation for the new subdivision map submittal, the owner has submitted to the Engineering Department a quitclaim deed for Lot C of Tract Map 6939 (Attachment 7), which is intended to resolve lingering title and parcel configuration issues. In addition, the owner will be recording a Certificate of Compliance to formally acknowledge and correct the lot's legal status in accordance with applicable subdivision regulations. These actions are being undertaken to ensure that the site is properly configured and compliant prior to the filing of their new subdivision map for their proposed project. A non-vehicular access easement was also discovered during entitlement along Lot C which will be required to be summarily vacated for the development to utilize their proposed southern entryway for public use. Per Section 8333(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code, it authorizes the City to summarily vacate (by Resolution with no public hearing) a public service easement that has been superseded by relocation or determined to be excess, and there are no other public utilities located within the easement. The adoption of the attached resolution will authorize the summary vacation of the non-vehicular access rights in accordance with the provisions of the California Streets and Highways Code and will further authorize the City Clerk to record the resolution with the County Recorder's Office. This action is necessary to clear title and remove restrictions that would otherwise conflict with the proposed site layout and access improvements anticipated as part of future development. If the City Council does not approve the proposed project, it may still choose to approve the summary vacation of the non-vehicular access if the Council in its sole discretion finds that the requirements for summary vacation have been met. Correspondence This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to 165 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on August 5, 2025. To date, Staff has received one email reiterating concerns presented to the Planning Commission and is included as Attachment 8. Environmental Analysis The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no Page 10 of 12 Page 488 more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neighborhood Corridor and Neighborhood General 3, respectively, which permits the development of a mixed-use development of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the majority of City's development standards and design guidelines other than those outlined in the Master Plan and Minor Exception sections of this report. The project site is located within the City limits on a site less than 5 acres and is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development and City infrastructure. The following are the four environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project, respectively, qualifies for the Class 32 Exemption. a) Traffic: The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)Screening Analysis (Ganddini Group, March 2025) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed mixed-use project is anticipated to generate 322 total daily trips including 23 AM peak hour trips and 27 PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday. Therefore, the proposed Project is not expected to generate 50 or more trips during the AM or PM peak hour and does not require a detailed LOS analysis. Additionally, the proposed project satisfies the City-established vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening criteria for projects located in a low VMT area. Therefore, preparation of a transportation impact study with VMT analysis is not warranted, and the project may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. Furthermore, a New Roadway Connection Analysis (Fehr& Peers, May 2025)determined that based on the travel patterns for the existing surrounding single- family neighborhood, a greater number of trips would occur along the Ruby Avenue Street connection through the project site from the adjacent residents than those of the project site (Attachment 5). b) Noise: A Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis was prepared for the project (Ganddini Group, March 2025). The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise and vibration levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds is expected to result in less than significant impacts. c) Air Quality: Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Ganddini Group, April 2025), emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not result in in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) significance thresholds. It was also determined that the GHG emissions will comply with the consistency measures outlined in the City's CAP checklist. Overall, all air quality and GHG impacts are considered less than significant. d) Water Quality: The project will include a Grading Plan, Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), and a Landscape Plan that will be prepared and reviewed for consistency with the City's adopted standard measures and regulatory compliance measures. The water quality analysis determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts associated with hydrology and water quality. (Adkan Engineers, March 2024). FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed with an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax Page 11 of 12 Page 489 is shared with the City. The proposed lot subdivision will increase the value of the project site when developed with townhomes and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The project supports the Council's core values of building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere and intentionally embracing and anticipating our future through thoughtful development of mixed-use neighborhoods with a variety of designs and services to meet our current and future resident's needs. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Project Location Attachment 2 — Project Plans Attachment 3— Planning Commission Minutes dated July 23, 2025 Attachment 4 — CEQA Section 15332 Exemption Attachment 5— New Roadway Connection Analysis Attachment 6— City Council Minutes dated July 19, 2023, and Master Plan Policy Attachment 7—Tract Map 6939 Attachment 8— Public Correspondence Attachment 9— PC Resolution 2025-021 Attachment 10 — Resolution 2025-065 with Conditions of Approval Attachment 11 — Summary Vacation of Non-Vehicular Access Rights Resolution 2025-066 Page 12 of 12 Page 490 Aerial . • RV++r m y ' a r= I - B ase Lm Road Project y rSite 1 i 4. 1 ;� S �s •� t ATTACHMENT Page 491 ATTACHMENT 2 Due to file size,this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Project-Plans Page 492 WA&L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda July 23, 2025 Draft Minutes Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regularjoint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on July 23, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz. Staff Present: Katherine Read, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Justin Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering; Shane Adams, Deputy Fire Marshal; Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner; Claudia Vargas, Associate Planner; Bond Mendez, Associate Planner; Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant. B. Public Communications Chairman Morales opened the public communications. Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 28, 2025. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling. Motion carried 3- 0-2 approved the minutes. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz. D. Public Hearings D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TENTATIVE MAP, & DESIGN REVIEW — HAMILTON LAND DEVELOPMENT—A request to subdivide 1.02 acres of land into 19 numbered lots and 1 lettered lot including site plan and design review of 19 single-family, detached residential units with 1 unit restricted for Very Low Income affordable housing in accordance with State Density Bonus Law for a site located between 19th Street and Hamilton Street in the Medium (M) Residential zone at 10295 19th Street; APN: 1076-121-17. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332— Infill Development Projects. (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20761 and Design Review DRC2024-00249). HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 1 of 12 ATTAC H M F NT933 Assistant Planner Serafin provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). She noted that the Conditions of Approval were revised to include additional clarifying language. A redline version was placed on the dais. Planning Director Nakamura shared that a letter was received this afternoon by Alta Loma School District expressing concerns about school safety. The letter had been distributed to Commissioners via email and was also placed on the dais for their review. She indicated that the Conditions of Approval related to Engineering Condition #5 will help provide further study on any potential impacts. Commissioner Dopp mentioned that there is already a lot of traffic on 19th and now this is adding another ingress/egress out of that area. He asked Engineering what kind of thought was put in place to handle that extra turn off of 191h, given that Mayberry is exactly to the north of that parcel. Engineering Director Welday responded that the final plans for the project will be required to evaluate any changes to the striping in order to ensure conflicts are avoided to that left turn and there are no issues between Mayberry driveway street interaction. Vice Chairman Boling stated that there will be additional traffic studies required in order to ascertain what traffic mitigation measures might be needed along 191h Street. Engineering Director Welday responded that a design exercise will be conducted to ensure the design accommodates those considerations. Vice Chairman Boling stated that no decision has been made yet because that analysis has not been completed. Engineering Director Welday responded that they have looked at it as part of the development review and they are comfortable they can fit in the turn lanes that may be needed to make it work. Vice Chairman Boling asked if it is determined that there would be a conflict, would there be a possibility of having a right-in/right-out for the Hamilton project. Engineering Director Welday answered that they do not currently have it conditioned that way but that would be an option they would look at. Chairman Morales asked Planning Director Nakamura for a brief summary of the State Density Bonus Law and how it impacts the city. Planning Director Nakamura provided an overview of the State Density Bonus Law and how it impacts the city's limitations in the development review process. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Applicant Hamilton provided a brief PowerPoint presentation with key points on the project. 19- units, 4 Bonus units and 1 unit is very low-income affordable. (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp stated that for the record, the commissioners are generally not opposed to housing projects or creating more affordable units. He shared that the commissioners attended a conference recently, and they discussed urban strategies and how to create more synergic communities and addressed the affordability crisis. He asked how affordable will this project be for the average family, since having one unit does not really make it an affordable project. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 2 of 12 Page 494 Applicant Hamilton said the very low-income unit will be in the $100,000 - $200,000 range. He said what they found out is there is a big demand for detached houses for young families. Commissioner Dopp asked if he had a price point in mind. Applicant Hamilton responded that the units are between 1,500 and 1,550 square feet and are expected to be priced around $700,000. Commissioner Dopp asked if he thinks it is affordable for people in their 20 and 30's. Applicant Hamilton answered that it is as affordable as it can be. Commissioner Dopp stated that they are using all these waivers to maximize their revenue and that it is their right but then decided that every single plan on one side of the street is going to look exactly the same and then on the other side of the street will look the same, with almost no variety. Is it too much to ask to have some variety in this project and make it more architecturally vivid. Applicant Hamilton explained that the changes were made in response to the Design Review Committee comments, aiming for a more cohesive project in line with the architect's vision. Commissioner Dopp responded that the state law grants him that right and respectively disagreed with that assessment. Vice Chairman Boling stated during the Design Review Committee meeting there were a number of issues that were brought up and suggestions to address some of those concerns. He asked how they would characterize the project before them tonight as compared to what was presented at the Design Review Committee. He asked what changes, if any were made. Applicant Hamilton answered they added a second-floor plan and made additional enhancements to the elevations on the end units by adding some additional windows and siding. Vice Chairman Boling asked if the color scheme between 1 and 2 had changed. Applicant Hamilton answered no. Vice Chairman Boling asked if any amenities were added elsewhere throughout the project. Applicant Hamilton answered no. Vice Chairman Boling went through all 29 Waivers being proposed and asked the Applicant to provide how each waiver, if not approved, would preclude construction. Applicant Hamilton answered to most of the questions, if not all, by stating it is a physical constraint or impossibility. Vice Chairman Boling asked about Wavier number #29; the minimum number of floor plans elevations variations, two floor plans would be required and three elevations. He asked if he is providing two floor plans but only one elevation. Applicant Hamilton answered they have three different elevations, including the enhanced right and enhanced left design. Vice Chairman Boling asked if he added a second-floor plan, after the Design Review Committee meeting. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 3 of 12 Page 495 Applicant Hamilton confirmed. Vice Chairman Boling asked if Waiver number#29 could potentially be withdrawn. Applicant Hamilton replied if that is how staff interprets it, then potentially yes. Vice Chairman Boling commented that this is the highest number of waivers he recalls seeing on a residential project without a master plan or development agreement and there are only 19 units. Chairman Morales stated the applicant mentioned he has completed several of these attainable housing developments and asked whether any of them featured more diverse architecture and color schemes, or if they were all similarly minimal in design. Applicant Hamilton answered he has done both. Chairman Morales asked if he thinks having at least three-color schemes would help make it look better. Applicant Hamilton responded that they would be open to adding a third color scheme. Alta Loma School District Board Member Rebecca Davies expressed concerns about student's safety and traffic congestion near the elementary school at Hamilton Street and requests a gate to prevent through traffic. Resident and friend of the Applicant, Steve Landis, expressed support of the project, stating that it would be a positive addition to the area. He added that from a financial standpoint, if nothing is done now, the site may never be developed. Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Commissioner Dopp noted that while the applicant's intent to reduce home prices is commendable, the core frustration lies in the sheer volume of those requests. Although the project meets a real housing need, it shows little innovation in design or planning. Instead, it seems the applicant focused primarily on maximizing legal allowances to push the project through. Commissioner Dopp talked about the gate. He expressed sympathy for Deer Canyon Elementary and understands the dynamics on Hamilton Street in itself and concerns of what adding an extra street will have on the community. He said that it is not being ignored but he is just unsure about having a gate there, sometimes they add more problems than they actually solve. He asked staff if there is a way to put in the conditions for a traffic study and have a conversation if there might be ways to solve this problem or alternate solutions. Planning Director Nakamura acknowledged the concerns and stated that discussions have taken place with the school district. She emphasized the need to avoid unintended consequences from new development and said evaluations will be conducted prior to construction to assess potential impacts, and that the situation will continue to be monitored as it progresses. She also remarked that the Engineering Department is typically very responsive in addressing concerns as they arise. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 4 of 12 Page 496 Vice Chairman Boling addressed a couple of the comments made by the applicant. It was indicated that 1 out of 4 units were affordable, specific to the density bonus units. He wanted to make sure that was clear so no one in the audience or the general public think that 1 out of 4 of all the units are going to be affordable or attainable. The applicant also indicated, during his presentation, that one home for one lot relegates us into a reduction to the standards. He asked the applicant are we not subdividing this parcel into individual lots for each unit and is that not normally how residential is developed one unit per lot, unless it is an ADU. He said there are plenty of instances throughout the city where one unit is on one lot and deviations, waivers and requests of this magnitude are not profitable. He expressed he does agree that the choice of product definitely drives a number of units, and the choice of his product has driven a significant number of waivers and reductions, and it feels like the only codes that we are following are Building and Safety Codes and Fire Codes. Development codes are out the window. Vice Chairman Boling addressed a comment to Alta Loma School District and the concerns that were brought up by the Board Member. He said it is always interesting when a new development comes into a neighborhood that has an existing school, and the school is concerned about additional traffic and potential safety issues that might come forth as a result of adding new housing. However, what is often forgotten, is that decades ago when existing residential housing was there and a school was not, residents that lived in the neighborhood prior to the school, had significant concerns about a new school going in and what traffic hazards and increased safety measures were going to transpire. He said as it pertains to state law and the challenges the commission faces, this is more geared to the general public and partially to staff. Vice Chairman Boling said in regards to the Design Review Committee meeting there were several concerns from residents, as well as commissioners, about this project; inadequate parking, setbacks, lack of amenities, density, singular style for all units leading to a cut and paste look and we also heard from residents the sentiment the city probably should not build housing units like this but beyond our city boundaries, Rancho Cucamonga and other cities are being blamed for not producing enough housing in response to a declared housing crisis but it is actually private market forces coupled with state mandates that control the outcome of what gets built and when, not the city. He said Rancho Cucamonga is not trying to over develop or compromise the character of our neighborhoods, but rather, trying to follow complex state laws while fighting an uphill battle to keep or regain local control over residential development matters. Vice Chairman Boling stated what we are dealing with here is the untenable scenario of state bureaucrats and developers taking over how our community is built. We the city are often the ones forced to implement the consequences of a one size fits none state policy or mandates passed in Sacramento which then affects our neighborhoods. He said if the community is upset from this reality, he strongly encourages them to hold their state elected officials accountable and push for reform. He said here in Rancho, we are doing everything we can to navigate the state- imposed requirements while trying to protect the character and quality of life that makes Rancho Cucamonga a world class city. Chairman Morales mentioned that the applicant is willing to do three color schemes and asked staff how we can take him up on his offer. Planning Director Nakamura responded if the commissioner would like to entertain this, staff has prepared a Condition of Approval that could be added to the project. It would state; prior to the issuance of building permits, a minimum of three-color schemes shall be provided subject to Planning Director review and approval. Vice Chairman Boling asked the Assistant City Attorney that of the remaining waivers that are on the table, is there any legal grounds for us denying any of the remaining waivers that have been requested. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 5 of 12 Page 497 Assistant City Attorney Read explained that per state law, the standard is you have to make specific findings based on substantial evidence that the proposed development would have a significant adverse impact on public health or safety, and this requires significant quantifiable direct and unavoidable impacts based on objective identified written public or health safety standards. She recalled the applicant mentioned Waiver number#29 potentially being removed from the list. She recommended that the Chairman ask the applicant to come back up to state that on the record. Chairman Morales invited the applicant back to the podium. Applicant Hamilton stated that as long as what we have are considered two floor plans and three elevations, then we do not seem to need that wavier. Planning Director Nakamura stated she had staff do additional research on this and they do not believe the current enhancement was considered an additional elevation, it would have to be of a separate design. She said the wavier can be proposed and modified since they did provide two floor plans because they had the primary and reverse floor plan but that it would need to maintain the elevations as only one was provided. Vice Chairman Boling stated Waiver number#29 could be amended to reflect the request of three distinct elevations being waived as opposed to the two floor plans. Applicant Hamilton agreed. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution 2025-019 to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20761 and Design Review DRC2024-00249 with the amendments to the Conditions of Approval adding three-color schemes and the affirmation amendments to Conditions#3 and#6 for Planning, and#5 for Engineering and staffing conditions to amend Waiver number#29 to element the wavier for two floor plans. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, DESIGN REVIEW, MINOR EXCEPTION — TRUE LIFE COMPANIES - A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use project comprised of 50 multi-family units including 10 live/work units, and a tentative tract map for condominium purposes located on approximately 2.3 acres of land within the Neighborhood General 3 (NG3)Zone, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; APN: 0208-432-16. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section 15332 (SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, Minor Exception DRC2025-00055). Associate Planner Mendez provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp asked staff if there were conversations with the developer about traffic calming devices on that major north-south street near the development, like speed humps to make it a bit more difficult for the average vehicle to see it as a short cut. Associate Planner Mendez responded that while there is nothing preventing vehicles from driving through, the section of Ruby Avenue includes two speed humps that will help reduce vehicle speeds and slow traffic down. Vice Chairman Boling asked staff for clarification on the speed hump for Ruby Avenue. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 6 of 12 Page 498 Associate Planner Mendez clarified that the extension of Ruby Avenue with the speed humps applies only on the project site. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. True Life Properties Vice President Gordon Jones introduced Applicant David Stearn who provided a brief PowerPoint presentation to the Commissioners. (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp asked the applicant what work experience does their firm have with live/work units, and what do they see in terms of potential out there to develop those units. He said, for the record, it has been his contention that live/work units usually do not hit the metric for retail. This is not a site that is super conducive to retail, but the mixed-use component still needs to be there. Applicant Stearn answered they have a fair amount of experience with it. He mentioned there are some challenges with this site such as the grade being 4 ft. below Base Line. Also, they have an existing retaining wall the city built that preserves that grade, and they have the access easement they share with assisted living facility. He said that makes a true retail site challenging here. There are a couple of unique things the city asked for them to do; 1) There is a restriction renting them out. 2) It is not set up for food uses. He said as a benefit, there are two entrances with a separate residential entrance from the entrance to the commercial space. Commissioner Dopp asked whether anything would prevent someone from using the space for storage. Applicant Stearn responded that Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) include provisions for annual garage inspections to ensure they are being used for actual parking rather than storage and noted that these measures can be expanded. Commissioner Dopp expressed concern about the units facing a major corridor and emphasized the importance of establishing clear guidelines to prevent owners from making unauthorized modifications. Vice Chairman Boling clarified that the parking management plan includes provisions for periodic inspection of the garage spaces. He noted that enforcement would primarily be handled by the Homeowners Association (HOA), with city enforcement serving as backup if necessary. The following persons commented on the project: Suzanne Luegering, Jennifer Diaz, Kristine Hatanaka, Travis T van Bibber, and Ronald Rempel. Included the following concerns/comments: • Traffic • Trash • Design does not fit with neighborhood • Ruby Avenue connection • Setback • Homeless • Privacy • Parking • Crime/Safety • Replace with a park HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 7 of 12 Page 499 For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted. The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: • Letter from California Housing Defense Fund reminding the city of its obligation to abide by the relevant state laws. • Email from Kristine Hatanaka expressed concerns about safety, traffic, parking, noise pollution, crime and obstructed views. • Email from James and Karen Cordova expressed concerns on the parking and traffic. • Email from Patrick and Angelina Soto noted concern about backyard view and building mass, amenity area setback and parking. Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Applicant Stearn responded to the setback concern, stating that considerable time was spent ensuring all utilities worked. He added that they made every effort to honor 30-foot setback from the property line. Commissioner Dopp noted public testimony was heard. He said he would like to have more conversations with developers that are open, and flexible. He said we are going to look at the project that is placed in front of them with the parameters given by the General Plan. Some of the resident's concerns about setbacks are reasonable and some concessions were made by the developer. He asked staff if there is a way to add a condition or through code compliance to ensure those units are used as live/work. Planning Director Nakamura reiterated his concern that the live/work unit will not actually be used as work use space. She noted that the applicant plans to include this requirement in the deed restrictions as part of the CC&Rs upon purchase. She added that enforcement could potentially begin with the HOA and, if necessary, be followed by the city. Associate Planner Mendez added that this site does require a non-residential component because the project is including 3,000 sq. ft. of non-residential floor place, the property is held to that. It could not be legally converted or used as a residential space. If that were to happen, there would be a response to that through Code Enforcement to correct that action because that space itself also has separate occupancy from the residential component of that unit. Vice Chairman Boling stated that we heard an example presented by the developer of what could be built in order to put things in perspective that they have scaled back, and they did a good job of identifying the maximum extreme on this site and we heard residents speak to the extreme on the other side. He said, a developer could do a more intense project and alternatively, residents could all pony up the money, buy it from the developer and leave it vacant. He said that when he first heard about this project, his concern was the northbound ingress/egress. He understood initially there may not have been an alignment of Amethyst for this project and that would have been horrendous to have an offset entry, that was concerning to him, but it has been worked out through an agreement with the residential housing facility. Vice Chairman Boling addressed one of the concerns that came up a few times by residents, that this type of project being placed here; project good, placement bad. He said in traditional urban planning you have to have some kind of transition from single-family residential to something else because it cannot all be single-family residential. At Base Line, if you look across the street, you have a shopping center and at Archibald, you have true retail. He said having mixed-use serves as a buffer, as something to take you from this to that. The project, as proposed, is in between and is even more residential than retail in that the 10 live/work units cannot support true retail. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 8 of 12 Page 500 You cannot put food or retail store front where your customer base is coming through constantly, since there is not enough parking, and the visibility is not good. It is not conducive to that type of retail business. He said what it is conducive to is professional services. Those type of businesses in this development are less impactful to the surrounding community than if it had been built out with a more traditional retail space. He noted that he applauds them for providing something less. Vice Chairman Boling stated that we saw a project earlier tonight and in contrast with another developer, this developer had reduced the bedroom in one unit in order to address the city and community concerns of meeting the parking requirements. That is profit margin they had taken out. They addressed landscaping in order to help with privacy and visibility to the neighboring houses. They relocated HVAC units to address noise concerns from the community. They addressed some of the privacy issues, they changed the number of windows and the type of windows and the placement in order to help ensure greater privacy. He said those types of compromises are what makes this process work. As opposed to state mandates and having the developer force us to approve projects some might consider to be lousy. He expressed how he appreciated the communities' inputs, and he hopes they appreciate that some developers are listening and are working to try their best to address their concerns. The commissioners work hard on behalf of the community as dedicated volunteers, striving to ensure that the highest- quality projects are brought into the community. Chairman Morales expressed his support for building for-sale homes rather than apartments noting that homeowners are more likely to take pride over ownership. He thanked the residents for their participation and efforts in helping to improve the development. He also expressed appreciation for the developer's responsiveness to the concerns raised by the community and for listening to their needs. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution 2025-021 to recommend approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109 and Minor Exception DRC2025- 00055. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz D3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A request to amend Section 16.36.09 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, repeal Planning Commission Resolution 87-96, and add Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning undergrounding overhead utilities. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Principal Engineer Miguel Sotomayor provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp asked whether the commissioners will see at any point what the determinations have been on undergrounding on a specific project. Planning Director Nakamura responded that it could be included if that determination is made early on during the review process. Commissioner Dopp recommended including it as an addendum. He asked about the six regions in-lieu fees previously collected, if they would get deposited into the respective bank. Engineering Director Welday explained that since the fees were collected citywide, they would likely be allocated to projects within the six regions as needs arise. If a project is underfunded, the regional bank would be used to cover the gap. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 9 of 12 Page 501 Commissioner Dopp said he noticed parts of the south side of Foothill are not included in the focus areas and asked what the reason was for not being included, especially on the eastern end of town. Principal Engineer Sotomayor explained that the focus areas correspond to those identified in the General Plan. Commissioner Dopp explained that his reasoning is based on the idea that if Foothill is being presented as the major corridor, it should logically be the primary focus area. Engineering Director Welday added that the focus areas are aligned with the General Plan the way the ordinance is currently written. He said there is also a provision in the ordinance that requires undergrounding in adopted specific plan areas. He said for most part, the areas along Foothill have been undergrounded and the areas that have not been undergrounded likely would not fall into any of the categories for exemptions anyway. Vice Chairman Boling clarified that we have projects that would require undergrounding but not right now because it is unfeasible for that particular developer to do it, in which case, they would pay in-lieu fees. He asked if there are projects that would be exempt from having to pay in-lieu fees. Principal Engineer Sotomayor confirmed that there would be and said it would be spelled out in the ordinance. Vice Chairman Boling reaffirmed there will be three types of projects that would be under consideration; 1) Those that would require undergrounding, 2) Those that would pay the in-lieu fees which would be used at a future time when sufficient funds are collected to pay for the total underground project, 3) Those projects that would be accepted. He asked what would happen if money is being used that was collected in another area of town in order to make up some deficiency that exists, and now that area has to be underground and the money had already been spent. Engineering Director Welday explained that the dollars that have been collected are not delegated to any particular region, they are delegated city wide. He said they would have to go back and look at nearly 50 years of transactions to try to untangle that. The cleanest way to do it is to look at it as there is still a general benefit within those regions and going forward, they would segregate it into the regions and before that they would have to use it as a bank to supplement the projects that are in each of those regions. Vice Chairman Boling asked what happens to the undergrounding of the area where that first project 50 years ago paid their in-lieu fees, and now and now it is going to be undergrounded. Where did those dollars come from. Engineering Director Welday said he is not sure he is following, adding that there seems to be a lot of hypotheticals. Vice Chairman Boling stated it seems like we are leap frogging the money, but we will figure it out. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 10 of 12 Page 502 For the record, it is noted that the following correspondence was received after the preparation of the agenda packet expressing support of the proposed ordinance. The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: Letter from Esoteric Homes Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Commissioner Dopp mentioned that streamlining parts of the process makes a lot of sense. He emphasized that as a discussion moves forward to City Council, it is important to understand the outcomes of projects, especially when utilities like wiring are involved, so they can develop a holistic vision of what future developments might look like. Vice Chairman Boling expressed his appreciation for the callout regarding the exemptions related to the focus areas. He also said he valued the clearly defined appeal process, noting that it will certainly help developers and project applicants. He added that these measures encourage responsible development in streamlined infill projects and expressed gratitude for the hard work of the Engineering department. Chairman Morales stated that the commissioners had previously reviewed some projects that required undergrounding, which raised concerns due to limited frontage. He noted this will fix it and make it better. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution 2025-022 to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Section 16.36.09 and adding Chapter 17.84 to the Municipal Code. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz D4. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend the zoning map designation for Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-2, and 16072-3, totaling approximately 150.79 acres, to amend the zoning designation from neighborhood Estate 2 (NE- 2) to Low Residential (L), and ensure consistency with the configuration and development standards of a previously approved 359 lot single-family residential subdivision, in a manner consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Traditional Neighborhood. This project qualifies for an exemption under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), as the proposed zoning map amendment will not have any direct impact on the environment. Tracts 16072, 16072- 1, 16072-2, and 16072-3. (Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141). Associate Planner Claudia Vargas provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Resident Stephen P. Gutierrez expressed concerns about noise, increased traffic, trash and crime. Resident Erick Space had questions about zoning and requested clarification if any new lots would be created. Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Planning Director Nakamura confirmed that no new lots would be created and amending the zoning designation would allow the developer to use the same development standards and the homes to the west. HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 11 of 12 Page 503 Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution 2025-018 to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend the zoning map as presented in the Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz. E. Director Announcements Planning Director Nakamura announced we have been awarded the Award of Merit which makes us the second-best Planning Agency in the State of California this year. She also mentioned that the next Planning Commission meeting will take place in the Tri-Communities Room due to construction in the Council Chambers. F. Commission Announcements - None H. Adjournment Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Planning Department Approved: HPC/PC Draft Minutes— July 23, 2025 Page 12 of 12 Page 504 ATTACHMENT 4 Due to file size,this attachment can be accessed through the following link: CEQA-Section-15332-Exemption Page 505 FEHRtPEERS Memorandum Date: May 2, 2025 To: City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Fehr & Peers Subject: 9505 Baseline Road— New Roadway Connection Analysis OC25-1134 Fehr& Peers reviewed the proposed new roadway connection at the proposed 9505 Baseline Road (DRC2024-00108) project. The proposed project has a previously approved Transportation Screening Assessment (Ganddini Group; February 6, 2025)which outlined that the Project proposes a 50-residential unit building, including 10 live/work units fronting Baseline Road. This project includes an extension of Ruby Avenue to Baseline Road. Attachment A provides the site plan. The proposed extension of Ruby Avenue to Baseline Road through the proposed project site provides a new north/south roadway connection between Baseline Road and Alder Street. This provides new connectivity and vehicle access to the local neighborhood, which is generally bound by Baseline Road to the North, Palo Alto Street to the South, Kirkwood Avenue to the West, and Klunsman Avenue to the East. Fehr & Peers evaluated how much traffic would be expected to use the new roadway connection, both from the existing neighborhood and the proposed project. As documented in the February 61" memorandum, the proposed project is expected to generate 22 AM peak hour trips, 25 PM peak hour trips, and 303 daily trips. As the project takes direct access from the new roadway connection, it is assumed that all project trips would use this roadway. For the existing neighborhood traffic, Fehr& Peers collected data from Streetlight. Streetlight is a big data source that aggregates metadata from cell phones and provides estimates of the number of vehicles on roadways and also tracks the origins and destinations of those vehicles. The data showed the travel patterns for the existing neighborhood,which is presented in Figure 1. Based on these travel patterns, the distribution of households through the existing neighborhood, and the other north/south roadway connections to Baseline Avenue, Alder Street, and Palo Alto ATTACHMENT 5 Page 506 May 2, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Street, Fehr & Peers assumed that all traffic on Amethyst Avenue and 10% of traffic on Baseline Avenue from the existing neighborhood would utilize the new roadway connection. This results in an additional 27 AM peak hour trips, 35 PM peak hour trips, and 344 daily trips. The total expected vehicle traffic on the new roadway connection would be 49 AM peak hour trips, 60 PM peak hour trips, and 647 daily trips. This is presented on Table 1 and in Figure 1. Table 1: Expected Travel on New Roadway Connection Daily Vehicle Trips from 9505 Baseline 303 152 152 22 6 16 25 15 10 Project Vehicle Trips diverted from Existing 344 178 165 27 7 20 35 22 13 Neighborhood Total 647 330 317 49 13 36 60 37 23 Sources:StreetLight Data,Fehr&Peers,2025 Attachments • Attachment A - Project Site Plan • Figure 1 - Existing Trip Distribution Page 507 \ 4� . @ \� VAL-41 M- 2 � - � - d2 D Page 508 > a a \oo La Mesa Dr a E Roberds St Q 0 rn 5 SL o aid � o� Q- 22% Baseline Rd 28% Baseline Rd 5 v ro � a yp�' Trips on Ruby Ave-Northbound IV v Daily:317 Peak AM:36 Peak PM:23 CO 6 Trips on Ruby Ave-Southbound 5 Daily:330 Alder st Peak AM: 13 Peak PM:37 ro Palo o st 23% ro Q t c Balsa St La N A • New roadway Begin/End - Ruby Avenue New Roadway - Ruby Avenue Project Site Figure 1 0 Neighborhood % Existing Neighborhood Trip Distribution 9505 Baseline Road - New Roadway VI Page 509 July 19,2023 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The CRY Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a dosed session an Wednesday,July 19,2023, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center,10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga, California.Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present veers Council Members:Ryan Hutchison,Kristine Scott,Ashley Stickler,Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L.Dennis Michael. Alan present were:John Gillison,City Manager;Elise Cox,Assistant City Manager;Nicholas Ghiralli,City Attorney;Matt Burris,Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development and Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. C.CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS None. D.CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730(RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER STADIUM);AGENCY NEGOTIATORS:JOHN GILLISON'AND ELISA COX,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;NEGOTIATING PARTY:RANCHO BASEBALL LLC;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT.(CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL— EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A);INLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP,L-C,ET AL V.CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;U.S.DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,CASE NO.5:21-CV-01656.SP;NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CASE NO.No.2255435.(CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION(D)OF SECTION 54956.9;NAME OF CASE:PEPE'S INC. V.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,CASE NO.5:20CV02506JGBSP(CITY) E. RECESS The dosed session recessed at 6:28 p.m. ATTACHMENT 6 July 19,20231 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 6 Page 510 REGULAR MEETING—7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER—COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,Public Finance Authority,and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on July 19,2023,In the Council Chambers at City Hall,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California.Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members:Ryan Hutchison,Kristine Scott,Ashley Stickler,Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L.Dennis Michael. Also present were:John Gillison,City Manager;Nicholas Ghirelli,City Attorney;and Linda Troyan,MMC, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. B. ANNOUNCEMENTSIPRESENTATIONS None. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Bill Kaufman,spoke about potential economic opportunities of commercial cannabis dispensaries and stated that he submitted an updated Economic Impact Analysis along with letters of recommendation on July 18, 2023 for the City Council's review. Seema Jain,distributed invitations and InvRed the City Council and Community to a"Sixth Sense Meditation and Wisdom"event at the Ontario Convention Center on Saturday,August 5,2023. D.CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Scott announced that she will need to abstain on item 03,due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company. Dl. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for Regular Meetings of July 5,2023. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BI-Weekly Payroll In the Total Amount of $2,542.926.97 and City and Fire District Weekly Chack Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company)in the Total Amount of$4,946,186,26 Dated June 26,2023, Through July 09,2023.(CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers far Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of$16,721.03 Dated June 26,2023, Through July 09,2023.(CITY/FIRE) 134. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of June 30,2023 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration of the Purchase of Thirty Sets of Firefighting Turnout Gear from All-star Fire Equipment,Inc.as a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of$115,990.(FIRE) July 19,20231 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 6 Page 511 De. Consideration of Amendment No.001 to the Professional Services Agreement No.2021-140 with Superior Pavement Markings Inc.for Annual Citywide Striping and Pavement Marking Services Extending the Agreement Term to June 30,2024.(CITY) 07. Consideration of Amendment No.2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Cambridge Seven Associates(Contract No.2020-120)for Design Services Not To Exceed$66,520.(CITY) D8. Consideration to Accept an Appropriate Grant Revenue in the Amount of$19,114 from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)for Fiscal Year 2019.(CITY) D9. Consideration to Accept the Heritage Park Equestrian Center Roof Repair Project as Complete, File the Notice of Completion,and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds.(CITY) D10. Consideration of Final Maps for Tracts 16072-1 and 16072-2,a Related Improvement Agreement,and Improvement Securities,Located North of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwand.Avenue,Related b Case No's.SUBTT16072.An Environment Impact Report was Certified for this Project on June 16,2004.(CITY) DI1. Consideration to Approve a Resolution Adopting a Memorandum of Understanding Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Local 2274 Relative to Wages,Benefits,and Other Terms and Conditions for the Period of July 2023 through June 30,2026.(RESOLUTION NO.FD 2023-036)(FIRE) D12. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Salary Schedules for the Fiscal Year 2023-24.(RESOLUTION NO.FD 2023-033)(FIRE) D13. Consideration of Resolution Adopting a Policy Regarding the Distribution of Complimentary Tickets or Passes Pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18944.1.(RESOLUTION NO.2023-090 AND RESOLUTION NO.FD 2023-035)(CITYIFIRE) MOTION:Moved by Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy,seconded by Council Member Stickler,to approve Consent Calendar Items DI through D13,with Council Member Scot abstaining on Rem D3,due to her employment with Southern Caltornia Gas Company.Motion carried 5-0. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S)-SECOND READING/ADOPTION None. F.ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) Ft. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No.1019,to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading,Repealing Chapter 10.76 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,Discontinuing the City's Police Tow Rotation Program and Making a Determination that me Ordinance is Exempt from the Caltomia Environmental Quality Act.(ORDINANCE NO.1019)(CITY) City Manager Gllllson introduced Michael Farmer,Assistant to the City Manager,who provided a verbal report for item F1. Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor Michael dosed the Administrative Hearing. July 19,2023 1 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 6 Page 512 MOTION:Moved by Council Member Stickler,seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy,to approve staffs mendation and Introduce First Reading of Ordinance No.1019,by title only and waive further readings. Linda A.Troyer,MMC,City Clerk Services Director,read the title of Ordinarce,No.1019 by title only. ORDINANCE NO.1019 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,REPEALING CHAPTER 10.76 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE,DISCONTINUING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S POLICE TOW ROTATION PROGRAM,AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION:Moved by Council Member Stickler,seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy,to approve staffs recommendation and Introduce First Reading of Ordinance No.1019,by title only and waive further reading.Motion carried 5-0. F2. Preliminary Review Hearing to Consider a Proposed Master Plan Application for a Mixed-Use Development that would Include Site-Specific Development Standards.Including a Floor Area Ratio Standard Lower than the Current Standard Under the Development Code,at 9505 Base Line Road.(CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Matt Marquez,Director of Planning and Economic Development and Sean McPherson,Senior Planner,who provided the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for Ram F2. Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor Michael dosed the Administrative Hearing. Council discussion ensued on support of the Master Plan Policy and staffs recommendation supporting the General Plan and proposed projects fitting in with existing area/neighborhoods. MOTION.Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy,seconded by Council Member Scott,to approve staffs recommendation to consider policy implications of reducing a non-residential floor area standard for a specific site at 9505 Base Line Road,authorize the projed to move forward understanding that this is not n approval or guarantee of an approval,and direct staff to Immediately analyze non-residential standards for mixed-use projects and consider a Development Cade Amendment to that affect.Motion carded 5-0. G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEMS)-CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Consider Resolutions Confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts;Street Lighting Maintenance Districts;and Park and Recreation Improvement District No.PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2023124.(RESOLUTION NOS.2023-087,2023. 088,2023-089)(CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Kelly Guerra,Special Districts Analyst,who gave a verbal report for item G1. Maya Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. July 19,20231 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 6 Page 513 MOTION:Moved by Council Member Hutchison,seconded by Council Member Stickler,to adopt Resolution Nos.2023-087,2023-088 and 2023.089,confirming the diagrams and assessments and ordering the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts;Street Lighting Maintenance Districts;and Park and Recreation Improvement District No.PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2023124.Motion carned 5-0. G2. Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 202&24.(RESOLUTION NO.FO 2023-034)(FIRE) City Manager Gillison reported the Fire Protection District's preliminary budget was adopted on June 22, 2023.After public noticing,the final budget is presented for adoption. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION:Moved by Council Member Scott,seconded by Council Member Stickler,adopt Resolution No. FD 2023-034,adapting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24.Motion carried H. CRY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Presentation from Empire Economics Inc.on the City's Annual Employment and Housing Trends Study and Analysis of the Current and Future State of Warehousing and Distribution.(CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Economist,Dr.Joe Janczyk from Empire Economics,who provided a report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H1. Council discussion ensued. City Council received and fled report. H2. Quarterly Development Update—Second Quarter 2023.(CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Matt Marquez,Director of Planning and Economic Development and Zack Neighbors,Deputy Director of Building and Salety,who provided a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for Item H2. City Council received and filed report. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. Consideration of the City Council Library Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Library Board aTrustee,.(CITY) MOTION:Moved by Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy,seconded by Council Member Hutchison,to appoint Christine DeVries and Laurel Rice to a three-year tens ending on June 30,2026 and appoint William Diepenbrock to fill an un-scheduled vacancy for an unexpired term ending on June 30,2024 on the Library Board of Trustees.Motion carved 5-0. July 19,2023 1 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 6 Page 514 12. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities(Cal Cities) Annual Business Meeting.(CITY) MOTION:Moved by Council Member Hutchison,seconded by Mayor Michael,to approve Voting Delegate,Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy,and Alternate Council Member Scott for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. AMENDED MOTION:Moved by Council Member Hutchison,seconded by Mayor Michael,to approve Voting Delegate,Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy,and Alternates Council Member Scott and Mayor Michael for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting.Motion carded 5-0. 13. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. 14. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:33 p.m. Approved:August 2,2023 C Linda yan,MMC art Services Director July 15,20201 Fire Protection District,Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 6 Page 515 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: City Policy Pertaining to Early Feedback on General Plan Amendments, Planned Community, Master Plan and Specific Plan Amendments, and Development Code Amendments. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive, file and adopt the attached policy on providing early Council feedback on General Plan amendments, Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan Amendments, or Development Code Amendments. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the city, Specific Plans, Planned Communities, and master plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code or as a bridge between the General Plan and the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. Under the Development Code, only the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Director, or a property owner may initiate applications for these legislative amendments. In many cases, property owners (or their agents) who apply for projects that may require multiple entitlements spend several years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council has any interest in considering the necessary legislative change for the project. ANALYSIS: While the City typically receives limited applications for legislative changes such as General Plan amendments, there are currently several such applications undergoing review by the Planning Department. These types of legislative approvals can only be granted by the City Council and have separate and distinct policy implications apart from the merits of a project. In order, however, for an application to be considered by the City Council (under present policy and process), that application must first undergo review and analysis by City staff, potential consideration by the Design Review Committee, environmental analysis under CEQA, and consideration by the Planning Commission. This process can easily take up to 18+ months and require an applicant to spend thousands of dollars for design and studies, all before they have any understanding whether the City Council has an interest in approving such a legislative change, which may be necessary before any other entitlements needed for a project may be approved. In practice, staff is finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty for the applicant and further complicates the development review process for city staff, particularly in situations with competing interests. Page 516 There is another alternative; some cities allow for an applicant to seek preliminary feedback from the city council in connection with the merits of a General Plan amendment or other legislative changes. After the Council provides its feedback on the proposed legislative amendment, the applicant can decide whether to pursue the legislative amendment, and the other entitlements for the applicant's proposed project,with the Council's preliminary policy considerations in mind. This opportunity provides the applicant with more information about whether the proposed project is likely to be successful after the application has been processed by staff. Rancho Cucamonga's past practice, dating back to the 1980's, was to request initial authorization by the City Council prior to beginning any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan that included more than one parcel or project (i.e., Town Square Master Plan). The City abandoned this policy in 2012 intending to streamline the development review process. While it may streamline the process, the new practice also causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review, in some cases actually complicating the process. Under the new process, a detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide a list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating the pre-application review is not an approval nor a guarantee of approval, that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against, and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis become available in the future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the intent of the preliminary review process is informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. After the administrative hearing, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. It is important to note that an initial City Council direction on a legislative change is not an approval and does not guarantee an approval. It would not involve any consideration of a particular project. Put more simply, it would only give the Council an opportunity to consider the policy implications Page 2 Page 517 of changing the General Plan, Specific Plan, Master Plan, Community Plan, or Development Code, as the case may be. Some of the policy considerations that the Council might consider as part of this initial feedback may include neighborhood impacts, economic development, and whether the use is appropriate for the site. This change creates an opportunity to provide staff and applicants with such feedback before thousands of hours, dollars, and years are spent processing an application. As such, staff recommends re-establishing the City's prior policy to bring requests for all General Plan amendments, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code changes requested by owners of real property or their authorized representatives to the City Council for an initial round of feedback. An applicant would still be required to conduct the same CEQA analysis and go through the same development and environmental review if it decides to pursue its applications further. This policy will not apply to any current applications that have been deemed complete. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This policy helps realize the City Council's vision for creating a world class community and the City Council value of"Equitable prosperity for all" by helping to identify and remove barriers within the City's Development Review process. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Legislative Changes Review Policy Page 3 Page 518 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director FROM: Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: Legislative Changes and Amendments Policy PURPOSE: To re-establish a policy for initiating General Plan amendments, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code amendments requested by builders and developers. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the city, Specific Plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. The City's past practice, dating back to the 1980s, was to request authorization by the City Council to initiate any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community, or Master Plan that includes more than one parcel or project (i.e., Town Square Master Plan). This policy allowed for discussion of the pros and cons of such requests and consideration for larger policy implications. The City abandoned this practice in 2012 with the intent of streamlining the development review process. However, currently, staff is finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review. It results in applicants spending many years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council may even desire considering such legislative changes. POLICY: An application for a legislative change, such as a General Plan amendment, that is initiated by a private property owner shall be recommended for an administrative hearing before the City Council as the first step in the Development Review process. The Planning Director shall schedule a preliminary review hearing before the City Council once the applicant has provided enough information about the proposed amendment and related project to permit the Planning Director to prepare a staff report for the hearing. This information shall include, but is not limited to, a statement explaining the applicant's reason for requesting the General Plan amendment, the proposed change in land use designations on the parcel(s), the project's proposed uses and density, and any other project parameters associated with the amendment that are deemed necessary by the Planning Director. A detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide a list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating the pre-application review is not an approval nor a guarantee of approval, that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against, and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis become available in the Page 519 future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the intent of the preliminary review process is informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. If an applicant does not want to go to City Council for the preliminary review and insists on a full hearing on the project merits, they shall sign an At Risk Waiver acknowledging they had the opportunity to go to the City Council on the legislative change but chose to decline. That document will become part of the entitlement package and administrative record. After the administrative hearing, alternatively, after signing an At Risk Waiver, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. If the City Council's input is not positive, staff shall use the City Council's feedback to problem solve with the applicant and work on a redesigned or different project. In such case, the Applicant shall be welcome to an additional review with the City Council to determine if a revised or alternative proposal might be a better solution. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. The City shall not charge a fee for the administrative hearing and will expedite scheduling a hearing date. The Planning Department shall provide the applicant at least ten (10) days written notice of the hearing date and time. Page 2 Page 520 #3 �l DATE: August 18, 2021 TO: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director FROM: Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development SUBJECT: Legislative Changes and Amendments Policy PURPOSE: To re-establish the policy for initiating General Plan amendment, Specific Plan amendments, and Development Code amendments requested by builders and developers. BACKGROUND: The General Plan and Development Code are the primary documents that regulate the physical development of the city. Additionally, in many areas of the City, Specific Plans serve to regulate land use in place of the Development Code. These documents regulate land uses, infrastructure, and the mitigation of impacts. The city's past practice, dating back to the 1980's, was to request authorization by the City Council to initiate any amendments to the development code or any Specific Plan, Planned Community or Master Plan that includes more than one parcel or project (i.e. Town Square Master Plan). This allowed a discussion of the pros and cons of such requests and larger policy implications that should be considered. This practice was abandoned in 2012 with the intention of streamlining the development review process. However, in practice, we are finding that this approach causes a greater degree of uncertainty and further complicates development review. It results in applicants spending many years and thousands of dollars designing a proposed project before ever knowing whether the City Council may even have an appetite for considering such legislative changes. POLICY: An application for a legislative change, such as a General Plan amendment, that is initiated by a private property owner shall be recommended for an administrative hearing before the City Council as the first step in the Development Review process. The Planning Director shall schedule a preliminary review hearing before the City Council once the applicant has provided enough information about the proposed amendment and related project to permit the Planning Director to prepare a staff report for the hearing. This information shall include, but is not limited to, a statement explaining the applicant's reason for requesting the General Plan amendment, the proposed change in land use designations on the parcel(s), the project's proposed uses and density, and any other project parameters associated with the amendment that are deemed necessary by the Planning Director. A detailed description of the applicant's project shall not be required. Staff will work with the City Attorney to analyze the provided information, provide list of pros and cons, and a staff recommendation to the City Council on only the legislative change for their consideration. The staff report shall include specific language indicating this this pre- application review is not an approval, not a guarantee of approval, and that staff and the Planning Commission may recommend against and the City Council may ultimately vote against or not support the project at the project hearings once additional details and analysis Page 521 become available in the future. While the City Council would not vote on the project at the time of this administrative hearing, each Councilmember may provide comments addressing positive or negative aspects of the amendment, potential issues that should be evaluated by staff, and suggested changes that could make the amendment more acceptable, if any. The City Council's comments should focus on the policy implications of the General Plan amendment, rather than the project itself. The City Council will not vote on any aspect of the amendment or project, as the preliminary review process is intended to be informational only. Staff will take the feedback provided by the City Council into consideration to help inform further staff analysis, possible conditions or modifications to the project, the recommendation to the Planning Commission, and ultimately the recommendation to the City Council. Staff shall provide a letter to the applicant following the administrative hearing memorializing the input and results of the hearing. The Applicant may then take that information into account in deciding whether to move forward in the process. After the administrative hearing, the application will move through the standard development review process for review by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council per our current process. If the City Council's input is not positive, staff shall use the City Council's feedback to problem solve with the applicant and work or a redesigned or different project. In such case, the Applicant shall be welcome to an additional review with the City Council to determine if a revised or different proposal might be a better solution. This policy shall only apply to private property owners and shall not apply to any City initiated legislative changes. This policy is not meant to apply to Development Agreements. Staff reports on legislative changes shall be prepared and presented only by the Planning Director, the Deputy City Manager of Community and Economic Development, the City Attorney, and the City Manager. The staff report may discuss the proposed project in general terms, but the staff recommendation will only address the General Plan amendment. The City shall not charge a fee for the administrative hearing and will expedite scheduling a hearing date. The Planning Department shall provide the applicant at least 10 days' written notice of the hearing date and time. Page 2 Page 522 TRACT N° 6939 tl IL Wiz? W v ATTACHMENT 7 Page 523 TRACT M 6939 &}� $ myrr �g M n j � �� R9 \;d• ae � zvr��r. � 6 ys° i Page 524 I$ mi�mi, InTRACT N96939 ;l a>» a m ao C i I Page 525 _ TRACT N'6939 s e roo Page 526 From: Mendez, Bond To: Nakamura,Jennifer Subject: FW:True Life Companies Project dre2024-00108/dre2O24-00109/dre2O25-00055 Date: Monday,August 11,2025 3:46:59 PM From:James Cordova <james.n.cordova@pm.me> Sent: Saturday,August 9, 2025 1:17 PM To: Mendez, Bond <Bond.Mendez@cityofrc.us> Subject: RE:True Life Companies Project dre2024-00108/dre2O24-00109/dre2O25-00055 IYou don't often get email from james.n.cordova&m.me.Learn why this is important Good morning Bond: We received the letter regarding the city council meeting on August 20. I'm just resending you my same concerns from the planning commission meeting. Thank you, James &Karen Cordova 9484 Alder St. Dear Bond: I am sending this email regarding theTrue Life Companies project on the vacant land at 9505 Baseline Rd. ( SW Corner of Baseline Rd. &Amethyst Ave, APN 0208-432-16). I live at 9484 Alder St, on the NE corner of Alder and Ruby Ave. I know that the project will more than likely be approved at the July 23rd meeting, however as you can imagine I do have the following concerns since my family and I live on that corner. They are as follows: 1. Parking -We have both of the houses on Ruby Ave who take all the parking on that street already. I believe this will cause any visitor or overflow parking from the project to park on any open curb parking spots on Alder. I believe the project is way under parked even though it may be up to city code(s). 2. Since parking will be an issue, would the City consider implementing parallel parking East of the Bike Path to Klusman Ave. or back in parking like the City did for the Arte Apartments? Or permit parking on all of Alder St. between Layton and Klusman Ave. 3. I do have a concern about traffic going through our neighborhood as I understand Ruby Ave. will be part of the "Public"Paseo that cars will use as a shortcut to our neighborhood and Baseline Rd. Would the city consider making True Life, or whomever they possibly sell the packaged project to, install a remote controlled or loop controlled gate at the end of Ruby Ave. 9 Thank you for your time. ATTACHMENT 8 Page 527 Best regards, James &Karen Cordova 9484 Alder St. Sent from Proton Mail for 10S On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:08 AM, Mendez, Bond<Bond.Mendez&ci ofrc.us>wrote: Good morning James and Karen, Your email has been received and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as part of the official record. To briefly respond to your questions ahead of the meeting, I wanted to clarify that all parking for this project is on private property only and there is no consideration at this time for street parking as that is an entire separate review that would need to have been considered and proposed in conjunction with the City for the use of public property. Traffic will be allowed to enter/exit from either Ruby or Base Line for the project design. As new communities/neighborhoods are built, the City requires as much connectivity as possible and as Ruby is currently designed as a stubbed street, the intent was always to have it carried through in the event of development. Access or controlled gates are no longer permitted in the city for"isolated neighborhoods". Just to clarify, the Planning Commission is not approving or denying the project, they will make a recommendation to the City Council and the project will be presented at a future public hearing. You will be notified again by mail of that public hearing. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you, Bond Mendez, CPD (she/her) Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 110500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 774-4326 I www.ci!yoErc.us ofrc.us From:James Cordova <iames.n.cordovaCaDpm.me> Sent: Monday,July 21, 2025 10:56 PM To: Mendez, Bond <Bond.Mendez(@cityofrc.us> Subject:True Life Companies Project dre2024-00108/dre2O24-00109/dre2O25-00055 You don't often get email from james.n.cordova(a�n� mme.Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. Page 528 Dear Bond: I am sending this email regarding theTrue Life Companies project on the vacant land at 9505 Baseline Rd. ( SW Corner of Baseline Rd. &Amethyst Ave, APN 0208-432-16). I live at 9484 Alder St, on the NE corner of Alder and Ruby Ave. I know that the project will more than likely be approved at the July 23rd meeting, however as you can imagine I do have the following concerns since my family and I live on that corner. They are as follows: 1. Parking -We have both of the houses on Ruby Ave who take all the parking on that street already. I believe this will cause any visitor or overflow parking from the project to park on any open curb parking spots on Alder. I believe the project is way under parked even though it may be up to city code(s). 2. Since parking will be an issue, would the City consider implementing parallel parking East of the Bike Path to Klusman Ave. or back in parking like the City did for the Arte Apartments? Or permit parking on all of Alder St. between Layton and Klusman Ave. 3. I do have a concern about traffic going through our neighborhood as I understand Ruby Ave. will be part of the "Public"Paseo that cars will use as a shortcut to our neighborhood and Baseline Rd. Would the city consider making True Life, or whomever they possibly sell the packaged project to, install a remote controlled or loop controlled gate at the end of Ruby Ave. ? Thank you for your time. Best regards, James &Karen Cordova 9484 Alder St. Page 529 RESOLUTION NO.2025-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20708,DESIGN REVIEW DRC2024-00108,MASTER PLAN ORC2024-00109,AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2025.00055,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.3 ACRE LOT INTO 60 NUMBERED LOTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES AND LIVEIWORK UNITS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL 3(NG3) ZONE(APN:0208-432-16),MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15332. A. Recitals. 1. True Life Companies filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, and Minor Exception DRC2025-00055,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject entitlements request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 23rd day of July 2025,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites priortothe adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 23,2025,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to an undeveloped project site located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue;and b. The project site is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory structures and has an area of approximately 2.3 acres.The site is approximately 240 feet east to west,and approximately 486 feet north to south;and C. The existing land uses on,and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties(relative to the above-noted parcel)are as follows: Attachment 9 Page 530 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2025-021 SUBTT20708, DRC2024-00108,DRC2024-00109,DRC2025-00055—REMPEL MIXED-USE JULY 23,2025 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General (NG3) North Commercial Traditional Town Center Center (CE1) South Suburban Neighborhood Single-Family Very Low Low(L)Residential East Residential Care Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General Facility (NG3 Suburban Neighborhood Wit Single-Family Very Low Low(L)Residential d. The project includes the subdivision of 2.3 acres of land located into 50 numbered lots for condominium purposes,and the construction of 40 residential townhouse units and 10 livelwork units,and a minor exception for a reduction in a third-story setback,and a master plan for site-specific development standards including a reduced floor area ratio,a reduced ground floor non-residential use height,a reduced ground floor transparency,and an increases primary building depth. 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map SUBT F20708 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Subdivisions Code Section 16.16.100 in support of the recommendation: a. The proposed subdivision, together with its provisions for its design and improvements,is consistent with the General Plan.The proposal is to subdivide a propertywith an area of approximately 2.3 acres of land located into 50 numbered lots,for condominium purposes, for the development of 50 multi-family residences including 10 live/work units.The underlying General Plan designation is Neighborhood Corridor which allows for and encourages infill development with a mix of land uses.The designation is intended for the development of multi-family residences with a maximum density range of 24 dwelling units per acre.The proposed project has a density of 22 units per acre.The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Design Review DRC2024-00108 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.040 in support of the recommendation: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan land use designation is Suburban Neighborhood Low,which permits the development of multi-family residences with a density range of 8-14 units per acre.The project is for the development of multi- family residences with a density of 14 units per acre;and Page 531 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2025.021 SUBTT20708, DRC2024-00108,DRC2024-00109,DRC2025-00055—REMPEL MIXED-USE JULY 23,2025 Page 3 b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.The project site is within the Medium(M) Residential District which permits the development of multi-family residences;and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.The project complies with each of the requirements ofthe Development Code except for the minimum required lot size as described in the staff report and for which is determined to be existing non-conforming pursuant to Development Code section 17.62 Nonconforming Uses and Structures;and d. The proposed use,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Minor Exception DRC2025-00055 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.16.110 in support of the recommendation: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code,and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.The General Plan designation of the project site is Neighborhood Corridor,and the zoning of the property is Neighborhood General 3 (NG3). The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation,zoning designation,or the residential purpose of the project site;and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area.The Minor Exception for reduced setbacks will not result in substantially larger units or buildings,an increase in lot coverage,an increase in density,or adjustments to the physical lot area of the site;and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s)is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions.The proposed setback still provides adequate distance from the adjacent property owners and does not compromise the design of the dwelling nor the overall project.The portion of the units that will encroach into the setback with the minor exception is the stairway and a closet space which contributes to the intedor use and design of the units;and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district,and will not be detrimental to public health,safety or welfare,or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct and access third floor living space and still allow for adequate distance beyond the first and second floors of the attached end units.This exception does not compromise the required setback of the overall buildings which will remain in compliance with the interior side yard setback.The development will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City.The setback reduction is unlikely to impact public health,safety,or welfare. Page 532 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2025-021 SUBTT20708, DRC2024-00108,DRC2024-00109,DRC2025-00055—REMPEL MIXED-USE JULY 23,2025 Page 4 6. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Master Plan DRC2024-00109 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.22.020 in support of the recommendation: a. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals,policies,and objectives of the General Plan.The project furthers the vision of the General Plan and the Neighborhood Corridor land use designation which encourages infll development with a mix of uses.The proposed residential and commercial land uses will complement and be compatible with the surrounding area's character,comprising residential,retail,office,and commercial uses.Project development would also help implement and further several goals and policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan,including the ability to provide complete places(LC1.1),ensuring the quality of public space(LC-1.3),and the provision of compatible development(L61.11).The additional housing units will also assist the City in reaching its State housing Regional Housing Needs Allocation(RHNA)outlined in the Housing Element;and b. The proposed master plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in this tifle.Development Code Section 17.22.020 provides the Master Plan as a tool for establishing site specific development standards for projects of exceptional design that cannot be built under an existing zone due to constraints of existing development standards relative to site constraints orthe location of a subject parcel or parcels within the city.The applicant is proposing a reduction in non-residential FAR.Staffs determination is supported by the fact that while the project is deficient in meeting the code required 0.4 to 0.6 non-residential FAR,the project proposes to still provide a cumulative 3,065 square feet of non-residential space.In addition to the reduced FAR, the applicant is proposing a reduced ground floor retail height from 12 feet to 10 feet,and a reduced ground floor transparency to 45%total.These deviations apply to the livelwork building that fronts Base Line Road.For the residential rowhouse buildings,the requested deviation proposed is to increase the building depth from 50 feet maximum to 55'-6"maximum for an enhanced design including wall and fagade articulation and projections. In addition to Development Code regulations which allow a developer to establish site specific development standards by way of a master plan,the City Council has established that parcels which meet certain criteria,specifically for lots which are less than 3-acres and which are not located within a frontage overlay along a primary corridor,may be granted a reduction in non-residential floor area due to these constraints,on a case by case basis. Staff supports the requested site-specific development standards.The project site is surrounded by a mix of commercial,retail,and office land uses that are readily accessible to future project residents and commercial tenants.Due to these circumstances,and despite not providing code- compliant nonresidential floor area,ground floor residential use height,primary building depth, and ground floor transparency,the project would also help implement the City's vision in the NG3 zone by introducing a medium-density(22 dulac)mixed-use development along a pedestrian and bicycle priority corridor. 7. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council make the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with approval of the application.The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332-In-Fill Development Projects Page 533 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2025-021 SUBTT20708, DRC2024-00108,DRC2024-00109,DRC2025-00055—REMPEL MIXED-USE JULY 23,2025 Page 5 for the following reasons:(1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations,(2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses,(3)the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered,rare or threatened species,(4)approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality,and(5)the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. a. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neighborhood Corridor and Neighborhood General 3, respectively, which permits the development of a mixed-use development of the proposed size and configuration.The project complies with the majority of City's development standards and design guidelines other than those outlined in the Master Plan and Minor Exception sections of this report. b. The project site is located within the City limits on a site less than 5 acres and is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development and City infrastructure. c. The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered,rare,or threatened species as determined by the Biological Resources study provided within the CEQA exemption (Glenn Lukos Associates 2023). d. The following are the four environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project,respectively,qualifies for the Class 32 Exemption: (1)Traffic:The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT)Screening Analysis(Ganddini Group,March 2025)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact.The proposed mixed-use project is anticipated to generate 322 total daily trips including 23 AM peak hour trips and 27 PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday.Therefore,the proposed Project is not expected to generate 50 or more trips during the AM or PM peak hour and does not require a detailed Level of Service(LOS)analysis.Additionally,the proposed project satisfies the City- established VMT screening criteria for projects located in a low VMT area.Therefore,preparation of a transportation impact study with VMT analysis is not warranted,and the project may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. Furthermore, a New Roadway Connection Analysis(Fehr&Peers,May 2025)determined that based on the travel patterns for the existing surrounding single-family neighborhood,a greater number of trips would occur along the Ruby Avenue Street connection through the project site from the adjacent residents than those of the project site. (2)Noise:A Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis was prepared for the project (Ganddini Group,March 2025).The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise and vibration levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds is expected to result in less than significant impacts. (3)Air Quality:Based on the Air Quality Assessment(Ganddini Group,April 2025), emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not result in in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District's(SCAQMD's)significance thresholds.It was also determined that the GHG emissions Page 534 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2025-021 SUBTT20708, DRC2024-00108,DRC2024-00109,DRC2025-00055—REMPEL MIXED-USE JULY 23,2025 Page 6 will comply with the consistency measures outlined in the City's CAP checklist Overall,all air quality and GHG impacts are considered less than significant. (4)Water Quality:The project Will include a Grading Plan,Best Management Practices (BMPs)outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP),and a Landscape Plan that will be prepared and reviewed for consistency with the City's adopted standard measures and regulatory compliance measures.The water quality analysis determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts associated with hydrology and water quality during construction and/or operations.(Adkan Engineers,March 2024). e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as determined by the reviewing departments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and external utility agencies. 8. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 above,this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval,attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 9. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY 2025. PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: T ny Morales,Ch' an ATTEST: n amura,Secretary I,Jennifer ecretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July 2025,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MORALES,BOLING,DOPP NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DANIELS,DIAZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 535 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20708, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2024-00108, MASTER PLAN DRC2024-00109, AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2025-00055, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.3 ACRE LOT INTO 50 NUMBERED LOTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES AND LIVE/WORK UNITS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL 3 (NG3) ZONE (APN: 0208-432-16), MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15332. A. Recitals. 1. True Life Companies filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, and Minor Exception DRC2025-00055, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of July 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and adopted Resolution 2025-021 recommending approval to the City Council. 3. On the 20th day of August 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on August 20, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to an undeveloped project site located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; and b. The project site is currently developed with a single-family home and accessory structures and has an area of approximately 2.3 acres. The site is approximately 240 feet east to west, and approximately 486 feet north to south; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel) are as follows: ATTAC H M E NaTe 1J@ Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) North Commercial Traditional Town Center Center 1 (CE1) South Suburban Neighborhood Single-Family Very Low Low (L) Residential East Residential Care Neighborhood Corridor Neighborhood General 3 Facility (NG3) West Suburban Neighborhood Single-Family Very Low Low (L) Residential d. The project includes the subdivision of 2.3 acres of land located into 50 numbered lots for condominium purposes, and the construction of 40 residential townhouse units and 10 live/work units, and a minor exception for a reduction in a third-story setback, and a master plan for site-specific development standards including a reduced floor area ratio, a reduced ground floor non-residential use height, a reduced ground floor transparency, and an increases primary building depth. 3. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20708 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Subdivisions Code Section 16.16.100: a. The proposed subdivision, together with its provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 2.3 acres of land located into 50 numbered lots, for condominium purposes, for the development of 50 multi-family residences including 10 live/work units. The underlying General Plan designation is Neighborhood Corridor which allows for and encourages infill development with a mix of land uses. The designation is intended for the development of multi-family residences with a maximum density range of 24 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 22 units per acre. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The City Council hereby approves Design Review DRC2024-00108 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.040: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Suburban Neighborhood Low, which permits the development of multi-family residences with a density range of 8-14 units per acre. The project is for the development of multi- family residences with a density of 14 units per acre; and Page 537 b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Medium (M) Residential District which permits the development of multi-family residences; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the requirements of the Development Code except for the minimum required lot size as described in the staff report and for which is determined to be existing non-conforming pursuant to Development Code section 17.62 Nonconforming Uses and Structures; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. The City Council hereby approves Minor Exception DRC2025-00055 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.16.110: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The General Plan designation of the project site is Neighborhood Corridor, and the zoning of the property is Neighborhood General 3 (NG3). The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception for reduced setbacks will not result in substantially larger units or buildings, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the site; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed setback still provides adequate distance from the adjacent property owners and does not compromise the design of the dwelling nor the overall project. The portion of the units that will encroach into the setback with the minor exception is the stairway and a closet space which contributes to the interior use and design of the units; and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct and access third floor living space and still allow for adequate distance beyond the first and second floors of the attached end units. This exception does not compromise the required setback of the overall buildings which will remain in compliance with the interior side yard setback. The development will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. The setback reduction is unlikely to impact public health, safety, or welfare. Page 538 6. The City Council hereby approves Master Plan DRC2024-00109 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.22.020: a. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The project furthers the vision of the General Plan and the Neighborhood Corridor land use designation which encourages infill development with a mix of uses. The proposed residential and commercial land uses will complement and be compatible with the surrounding area's character, comprising residential, retail, office, and commercial uses. Project development would also help implement and further several goals and policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, including the ability to provide complete places (LC1 .1), ensuring the quality of public space (LC-1.3), and the provision of compatible development (LC-1.11). The additional housing units will also assist the City in reaching its State housing Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) outlined in the Housing Element; and b. The proposed master plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in this title. Development Code Section 17.22.020 provides the Master Plan as a tool for establishing site specific development standards for projects of exceptional design that cannot be built under an existing zone due to constraints of existing development standards relative to site constraints or the location of a subject parcel or parcels within the city. The applicant is proposing a reduction in non-residential FAR. Staff's determination is supported by the fact that while the project is deficient in meeting the code required 0.4 to 0.6 non-residential FAR, the project proposes to still provide a cumulative 3,065 square feet of non-residential space. In addition to the reduced FAR, the applicant is proposing a reduced ground floor retail height from 12 feet to 10 feet, and a reduced ground floor transparency to 45%total. These deviations apply to the live/work building that fronts Base Line Road. For the residential rowhouse buildings, the requested deviation proposed is to increase the building depth from 50 feet maximum to 55-6" maximum for an enhanced design including wall and fagade articulation and projections. In addition to Development Code regulations which allow a developer to establish site specific development standards by way of a master plan, the City Council has established that parcels which meet certain criteria, specifically for lots which are less than 3-acres and which are not located within a frontage overlay along a primary corridor, may be granted a reduction in non-residential floor area due to these constraints, on a case by case basis. Staff supports the requested site-specific development standards. The project site is surrounded by a mix of commercial, retail, and office land uses that are readily accessible to future project residents and commercial tenants. Due to these circumstances, and despite not providing code- compliant nonresidential floor area, ground floor residential use height, primary building depth, and ground floor transparency, the project would also help implement the City's vision in the NG3 zone by introducing a medium-density(22 du/ac) mixed-use development along a pedestrian and bicycle priority corridor. 7. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with approval of the application. The Planning Commission and Planning Department staff have determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 -In-Fill Development Projects Page 539 for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3)the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. a. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are Neighborhood Corridor and Neighborhood General 3, respectively, which permits the development of a mixed-use development of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the majority of City's development standards and design guidelines other than those outlined in the Master Plan and Minor Exception sections of this report. b. The project site is located within the City limits on a site less than 5 acres and is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development and City infrastructure. c. The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species as determined by the Biological Resources study provided within the CEQA exemption (Glenn Lukos Associates 2023). d. The following are the four environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project, respectively, qualifies for the Class 32 Exemption: (1) Traffic: The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis (Ganddini Group, March 2025) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed mixed-use project is anticipated to generate 322 total daily trips including 23 AM peak hour trips and 27 PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday. Therefore, the proposed Project is not expected to generate 50 or more trips during the AM or PM peak hour and does not require a detailed Level of Service (LOS) analysis. Additionally, the proposed project satisfies the City- established VMT screening criteria for projects located in a low VMT area. Therefore, preparation of a transportation impact study with VMT analysis is not warranted, and the project may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. Furthermore, a New Roadway Connection Analysis (Fehr & Peers, May 2025) determined that based on the travel patterns for the existing surrounding single-family neighborhood, a greater number of trips would occur along the Ruby Avenue Street connection through the project site from the adjacent residents than those of the project site. (2) Noise: A Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis was prepared for the project (Ganddini Group, March 2025). The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise and vibration levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds is expected to result in less than significant impacts. (3) Air Quality: Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Ganddini Group, April 2025), emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not result in in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) significance thresholds. It was also determined that the GHG emissions Page 540 will comply with the consistency measures outlined in the City's CAP checklist. Overall, all air quality and GHG impacts are considered less than significant. (4) Water Quality: The project will include a Grading Plan, Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), and a Landscape Plan that will be prepared and reviewed for consistency with the City's adopted standard measures and regulatory compliance measures. The water quality analysis determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts associated with hydrology and water quality during construction and/or operations. (Adkan Engineers, March 2024). e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as determined by the reviewing departments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and external utility agencies. 8. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 above,this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 9. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025. BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Sevy, City Clerk I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 20th day of August 2025, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Page 541 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF NON-VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT C OF TRACT 6939, LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF RUBY AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 4,of the Streets and highways Code,may summarily vacate an easement under certain conditions specified therein; and WHEREAS, certain non-vehicular access restrictions governing Lot C at the north end of Ruby Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga were dedicated as shown on the map of Tract 6939,filed in Book 91, pages 49 to 52 inclusive of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, these restrictions transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8333(c)upon incorporation of the City; and WHEREAS, Section 8333(c)of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes the City to summarily vacate (by Resolution with no public hearing)a public service easement that has been superseded by relocation or determined to be excess and there are no other public utilities located within the easement; and NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby summarily vacates non- vehicular access restrictions applicable to Lot C within said Tract 6939 located at the north end of Ruby Avenue. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said non-vehicular access restriction as described and depicted more particularly on EXHIBIT "A" and shown on EXHIBIT "B" no longer constitutes a public easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025. ATTACHMENT 11 Resolution No. 2025-XXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 542 EXHIBIT"A" SUMMARY VACATION OF NON-VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS THAT PORTION OF LOT"C" AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 6939, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN BOOK 91 OF MAPS,AT PAGES 49 THROUGH 52, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT"C"; THENCE NORTH 89'53'24" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT"C" ABUTTING RUBY AVENUE (60.00 FEET WIDE)AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6939, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. SEE EXHIBIT"B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION: ��NALLA,yO ITCHELL JAY ADKISON, PLS 8936 gd���JAY,g�l�9L 0 . 3936 OF CAl.1F�P� Page 1 of 1 A O ' --o o �0 R 0 4 0 0 SON b/ o W Q '� C° an y u� �u owv) rnz33 0 > M p z �Oo� c0 N N Q ' coo �' 0 Z Q ��W Z S O In l[) J �� J Ln O Z O 0) O) �y C)� ZZQ � ui zzz U� 07 O_m(%jWQ JJJ N U Li o (n 00 W O O UzCi s > N F� pz Z z oNz v OU p pLW0 ~pd0- — — I - O I W Qz= � � Qom\ 0 Zo0 uj z z z 0 � zj j I w N I d Q O CL LLJ a Qw R _ I gym , oZ � U ~ Lu C7 Lu CA)o CL O~ / kZ oowN � _ �� _ ` N LV w mLn _ J O rn (,00'LL) LL o O I ZS 6ti/L 6 8W a R Z\ (3„Z-V,90.00N) " I Q z�-v 6069 'ON IJVal � Q O d I — ���\ 9S oZ I W�� .e.o.d ZO ( ?z j (3„z�,so.00N) I I ( coo-z w Pz- z a m (,00'Lz CJD Q I (o TOW ( o o I 3�N- .18112J WOJZLu I a I1 n I n- 1 - - N Qo�m m a C�INC (,00'LL) o �z I�m (3„Z-V,90.00N) ^ m J WOW�U O O I I O W O O Z WI W O O 2 OO Z I Z) I 00 O � cS IU— (3..j-P,90.00N) o � Q � i' Lo �� O I O NO Cl 00 -no _ I o 00o0 I zo `moo\ 3 Q00 ro W 00 z J O JZ Z 00 0ED � W � Q1000 ww�� (,OOLL) w I ¢ Co vn CL 0) (3„Z6,90.00N) m o z ; ZS-6-b/1 6 8W I ai �U o~o zo 6£'69 'ON lObNl a No ZS I �- L,� 0(D my O O O mr 2025-08-20—Regular Meeting: Email received on Public Hearing Item G1 From: James Lloyd <james@calhdf.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 2:41 PM To: City Council <CityCouncil@cityofrc.us> Cc: manager@cityofrc.us; cityclerk@cityofrc.us; nghirelli@rwglaw.com; Planning, City <City.Plan ning@cityofrc.us>; Thornhill, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us> Subject: public comment re item G1 for tonight's Council meeting You don't often get email from james@calhdf.org. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. Dear Rancho Cucamonga City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund ("CaIHDF") submits the attached public comment re item G1 for tonight's Council meeting, the proposed 50-unit housing development project at Baseline Road and Amethyst Ave. Sincerely, James M. Lloyd Director of Planning and Investigations California Housing Defense Fund james@calhdf.org CaIHDF is grant & donation funded Donate today- https://calhdf.org/donate/ L UDF Aug 20, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed Housing Development Project at Baseline Road and Amethyst Ave. To: citycouncil(acityofrc.us; Cc: manager(acityofRC.us; cityclerkcacityofRC.us; nahirellicarwglaw.com; Planning(acityofRC.us; elizabeth.thornhillocityofrc.us; Dear Rancho Cucamonga City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund("Ca1HDF")submits this letter to remind the City of its obligation to abide by all relevant state laws when evaluating the proposed 50-unit housing development project at Baseline Road and Amethyst Ave.These laws include the Housing Accountability Act("HAA'),AB 130,and California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA'). The HAA provides the project legal protections.It requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant housing development projects unless findings can be made regarding specific,objective,written health and safety hazards.(Gov.Code, § 65589.5,subd.(j).)The HAA also bars cities from imposing conditions on the approval of such projects that would reduce the project's density unless,again,such written findings are made.(Ibid.)As a development with at least two-thirds of its area devoted to residential uses,the project falls within the HAAs ambit,and it complies with local zoning code and the City's general plan. The HAA's protections therefore apply,and the City may not reject the project except based on health and safety standards,as outlined above.Furthermore,if the City rejects the project or impairs its feasibility,it must conduct"a thorough analysis of the economic,social,and environmental effects of the action:'(Id. at subd.M.) Additionally,the project is exempt from state environmental review under the Class 32 CEQA categorical exemption(In-Fill Development Projects)pursuant to section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines,as the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as the applicable zoning designation and regulations;the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more 2201 Broadway, PH1, Oakland, CA 94612 www.calhdf.org than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses;the project site has no value as habitat for endangered,rare,or threatened species;approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality;and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.Furthermore,the project is eligible for a statutory exemption from CEQA pursuant to AB 130 (Pub.Res. Code, § 21080.66),which was signed into law on June 30,2025 and effective immediately(Assembly Bill No.130,2025-2026 Regular Session, Sec.74,available here). Caselaw from the California Court of Appeal affirms that local governments err,and may be sued,when they improperly refuse to grant a project a CEQA exemption or streamlined CEQA review to which it is entitled.(Hilltop Group,Inc.v County of San Diego(2024)99 Ca1.App.5th 890,911.) As you are well aware,California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage.New housing such as this is a public benefit:it will increase the city's tax base;it will bring new customers to local businesses;and it will reduce displacement of existing residents by reducing competition for existing housing.While no one project will solve the statewide housing crisis,the proposed development is a step in the right direction.Ca1HDF urges the City to approve it,consistent with its obligations under state law. Ca1HDF is a 501(c)(3)non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels,including low-income households.You may learn more about Ca1HDF at www.calhdf.org. Sincerely, 1:�� — S_ Dylan Casey Ca1HDF Executive Director pvt-v L_ James M.Lloyd Ca1HDF Director of Planning and Investigations 2 of 2025-08-20-Regular Meeting: Email received on Public Hearing Item G1 From: luegering@aol.com <luegering@aol.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 20, 2025 3:30 PM To: Mendez, Bond <Bond.Mendez(a@cityofrc.us> Subject:APN: 0208-432-16 This project has 50 condo units with 10 business units. The proposed main egress is Ruby St which is two homes long, and Ts into Alder St which is 1 1/2 blocks long with only 25 homes. It is anticipated to generate 322 auto trips per day, which will more than triple our current traffic. Their traffic analysis: "Does not result in any effects related to traffic." completely ignores the dangerous impact on a neighborhood with children on bikes, families with dogs, and seniors from the two senior facilities taking their daily walks. Also of great concern is the parking issue. Every condo complex has extensive overflow parking on the surrounding streets. As cars cannot park on Baseline, that leaves Alder St as the only option. The 10 business units only exacerbate the problem. Where are our family and friends supposed to park? There are no outdoor amenities included in this jammed together project. They indicate a paseo as fulfilling that requirement. Paseo is just a fancy name for sidewalk, and should not count as an outdoor space. Where are their children going to play? In our neighborhood? I have lived on Alder St for 54 years. This three-story, high-density project is absolutely NOT COMPATIBLE with a safe and quiet single-story residential family neighborhood. I ask you to please consider the the negative impact a project of this density will have on our neighborhood. Sincerely Suzanne Luegering Master Plan Preliminary Review Hearing City Council August 20 , 2025 Council Feedback for Legislative Actions • Staff provides analysis of the proposed request; • Council offers initial policy comments; • Feedback is not an approval or a guarantee of future approval; • Feedback is not a guarantee of a future positive staff recommendation ; • Following this input, the applicant may decide whether to move forward with the project. M Overview Y R • Applicant: Sares Regis • Location : NEC 4t" & Haven • Land Use: ctArea • GP: City Center = • Zone: Center 2 (CE2) • Gateway Location •t • Legislative change: • Master Plan - { CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ix Project Highlights • 14.5-Acre Site — mixed-use master plan with housing, retail , and public spaces; • 610 Residential Units — A mix of apartments & 6,000 square feet of live/work units wrapped around amulti-story parking structure; • 160-Room Hotel with conference facilities that include a 6,200 sq . ft. meeting room along with a 3,000 sq. ft. of outdoor gathering area; • 107,000 sq . ft. Non-Residential — hotel , commercial buildings, live/work units; • Gateway corner with restaurant pads and public plaza. r 1 IIT LA —-- T - - f i•'. 3 u❑sp 9 as I _ LU I W `I T ' PAF.11 IQ pa{,c� �.�� r4 4 ; N Fl,TF4. - ................. ,. Ex . FIN; �► r, :y�� ,� IL T � m "M MOM 11 b „4kME ITIE � �oURTti TVARd ve ' f.600 F 13.d40 SF Fill j 5 NI a 6 AM i} { HAVEN AVE I I -- -, -- -- Y -- - — --- _ _ --------------F Fr i l W. ' - TIM ir JW -Ilk A ju Ij 1.2 Iwo —may! 3 F •—` �,- - • T Adivate (Looking Preliminary • - Go to 5ettin Summary of Proposed Legislative Changes • Applicant requests 15 site-specific deviations for mixed-use project • Deviations grouped into three main categories: o Non-residential FAR — Intensity and land use mix o Building Design Standards — Frontage treatment and ground-floor activation o Site Planning Standards — Circulation, block layout, and open space Proposed Change — Floor Area Ratio Reduce the non-residential floor area ratio • Required - 631 ,620 sq . ft. (Between 1 .0 & 2.0 FAR) • Proposed — 107,000 sq . ft. (0. 17 FAR) • Pros • Pros: Strong housing delivery, hotel with economic benefits, some corner activation. • Cons • Floor Area Ratio below standard, fewer jobs/commercial services, reduced vibrancy. Site Plan and Block Configuration • Pros • Allows site and block flexibility while supporting key urban design goals; • The corner open space provides a pedestrian entry to the overall project and a gathering spot; • Paseo still links residential/commercial areas to the right of way. • Cons • Fewer building types reduce architectural variety and urban character; • Corner open space is less usable for interior residents, shifting from its central green role; • Paseo lacks full street-to-street connectivity. ii � �R 1 Pi�UIS -e ll rg - ri f � _ �k � ��r'' �-3^- 31•:-'Y'� f•!'"�4�""`"` �f` �s- + .,t- k. T'V 1 r .% 1=ea im- -� r pp- rr " . 1 m f 49 kii.5• +i+ f�� - f ; 6a irate Main Street - Go to Proposed Change — Design Modifications • Pros • Could provide better connectivity with the parcel to the south. • Open space enhances pedestrian experience; • Flexible entry placement improves accessibility. • Cons • One-story pad buildings at the corner weaken gateway presence and urban character; • Less commercial frontage reduces long-term retail potential. • y l 1 I - [ 40 Gateway Vision for Haven Avenue and 4thStreet Economic Development Considerations • City strategy seeks destination-driven restaurants; • Proposed restaurants average 4,500 sq. ft.—too small for high-end users; • Many target restaurants seek 10,000-18,000 sq. ft. with surface parking; • Larger restaurants at this corner could: • Attract high-demand tenants; • Enhance visibility and project presence; • Leverage proximity to offices, hotels, Cucamonga Station, HART District, Toyota Arena, Ontario Airport, and I-10. Next Steps • Council to provide comment at the hearing • Applicant to determine next step .. � .\ \ .��k} . . 100 @|� f� ■ � �� � -=s� ^ } 0 0 � z_ • � �w . z � � � - \ � ,�■ � � _ ^ �\� , . 1 ' - - � - � - _ _ _ \ ■� � � � � � �®� � 40 �• \}��� :\/� , � ��� , � ��/� � �- � \d�2 ' � .� y / � 2�\z ,• � . _ - ' � . I x - 1 5 5 a �t h I � l �# r 4 M 1 � FA a f __._ 14 w� POWN � Ia ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Approve a Request for Site Plan and Design Review of 8 Single-Family Residences on 4.78 Acres of Land on a Previously Approved Tract Map (Tract 14644)at the Terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone, Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay; APNs: 1061-381-24 thru 31. The Project Qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024-00174). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny Appeal DRC2025-00130 and uphold the Planning Commission's May 14, 2025, approval of Design Review DRC2024-00174, for the construction of eight (8) single-family residences on previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT14644). BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990, and subsequently the final map was approved by the City Council on July 18, 1991. Because recorded tract maps do not expire under State law, Tract Map 14644 remains valid. The map established the subdivision of the subject property into eight (8) residential lots and defined the alignment and extension of Camellia Court to serve the new lots. Since the final tract map was approved in 1991, no physical work has been done on the site, however it is legally divided into 8 lots with a cul-de-sac configuration. On May 14, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider Design Review application DRC2024-00174, which proposes the construction of eight (8) new single- family residences on the previously approved lots. Prior to the hearing, the City received five (5) written public comments, which were provided to the Planning Commission and addressed in the staff report and staff presentation. At the meeting on May 14, 2025, approximately 10 speakers also expressed concerns about the project. Following public comment and deliberation, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the Design Review application. On May 22, 2025, the City received a timely appeal of the Planning Commission approval (Attachment 2). The appeal expresses both technical concerns and personal experiences that, in Page 545 the opinion of the appellant, were not adequately addressed during the project review process. ANALYSIS: The appeal raises several concerns about the potential impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding neighborhood, including environmental effects, compatibility with existing homes, infrastructure capacity, public safety, and overall quality of life. The Planning Commission considered these issues during its public hearing and determined that the project complies with all applicable Development Code requirements for properties within the Very Low Residential Zone and the Hillside Overlay, including standards for building height, setbacks, and lot coverage. As part of its deliberations, the Planning Commission also evaluated the visual and contextual relationship between the proposed homes and the surrounding neighborhood. While the City encourages new development to be context-sensitive, it is also guided by State law and the Development Code, which require approval of residential projects that meet all applicable objective standards. As such, the City does not have the discretion to deny or require modifications to a project solely because the proposed homes differ in size or design from existing development—provided the project complies with all objective criteria, as this proposal does. The underlying Tract Map (SUBTT14644),which subdivided the property into eight residential lots and established the layout for the extension of Camellia Court, was approved by the City Council in 1991 and remains valid today. This map established the land use pattern and granted development rights for the site, and it is not subject to reconsideration through the current application. The Design Review application is limited to the design of the individual homes and the associated public improvements required for the previously approved extension of Camellia Court. Staff has reviewed the issues raised in the appeal, many of which were previously addressed during the Planning Commission review process. The following discussion provides staff's responses to the primary issues outlined in the appeal letter. 1. Neighborhood Compatibility — The appellant raised questions about the compatibility of the proposed development with the existing neighborhood, specifically citing concerns about the proportion of two-story to single-story homes, the number of bedrooms, and the size of garages. Staff has reviewed these issues under the applicable provisions of Development Code Chapter 17.122, which includes the City's Hillside Development Regulations and Building Design Standards and has determined that the project is in full compliance with all requirements. In accordance with Section 17.122.010.A.1.a, the project includes 25 percent single-story homes, meeting the minimum requirement for single-family residential developments. While the proposed homes may include more bedrooms and larger garages than existing homes on Camellia Court, the Development Code does not regulate the number of bedrooms or garage size in single-family residential developments. Instead, house size is regulated by objective standards such as lot coverage, building height, and setbacks—all of which the project satisfies.Additionally, the architectural design incorporates a cohesive palette of materials, consistent detailing, and thoughtful massing, resulting in a visually compatible development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Cul-de-Sac Length and Emergency Egress — The appellant is concerned that extending Camellia Court creates a long cul-de-sac with a single access point, posing evacuation and fire safety risks. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District has reviewed and confirmed Page 2 Page 546 that the existing cul-de-sac length and single access are acceptable and meet all applicable fire and emergency access standards. The project conforms to the lot layout and cul-de-sac street previously approved by the Planning Commission in 1990 and legalized in 1991. The current Planning Commission's approval covers only the design of homes on previously approved lots; no changes to street layout or access are proposed. 3. Pedestrian Safety and Sidewalks — The appellant expressed concern about increased traffic resulting from the extension of Camelia Court, as well as the lack of sidewalks on the existing, developed portion of the street. While the project will result in additional vehicle trips, the extension was designed in accordance with City engineering standards in place at the time that the subdivision map was approved. Beyond this, the completion of Camelia Court as approved by the subdivision map in the early 1990s will improve circulation by eliminating the current dead-end condition. The developer is responsible for installing sidewalks, curbs, and gutters within the boundaries of the approved tract map. Improvements to the existing portion of Camelia Court, which lies outside the project boundary, are not required as part of this development. All vehicles and pedestrians using the street will remain subject to applicable traffic regulations and safety laws. 4. Stormwater Runoff and Flooding —The appellant raised questions about additional water runoff and concerns of flooding for existing homes on the south side of the street. The development will include on-site drainage improvements designed in accordance with City engineering standards. The proposed stormwater management plan has undergone technical review and received preliminary approval from the Engineering Department. 5. Water Supply and Fire Protection — The appellant raised concerns regarding emergency water pressure dilution. As part of the project review process, water pressure and fire flow requirements were evaluated and determined to be adequate to serve the proposed development. The project also received preliminary approval from the Fire District, which raised no concerns regarding water supply or fire protection capabilities. 6. Equestrian Access—The appellant raised concerns regarding continued horse trail access across a portion of the project site that, while informally used by equestrian riders, is not designated as an equestrian trail on the approved final map. The original tract map, approved in 1991, extended the existing equestrian trail located behind the homes on the south side of Camellia Court around the project site, providing a continuous trail connection. The project does not obstruct designated trail connectivity. 7. Wildlife Habitat — The appellant raised concerns regarding potential impacts to wildlife resulting from the proposed project. By the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a biological assessment was conducted as part of the project's environmental review. The assessment identified standard mitigation measures, including pre-construction surveys for nesting birds and burrowing owls prior to grading activities—measures that are commonly required for development projects within the City. The project site is privately owned and designated for residential development under the City's General Plan and Zoning Map. No special habitat protections apply beyond the standard CEQA requirements identified in the biological assessment. 8. Construction Impacts and Quality of Life — The appellant express concern about construction impacts on their quality of life. Short-term construction impacts are temporary and will be regulated through conditions addressing noise, dust control, and hours of operation per City code. Page 3 Page 547 9. Incorrect Parcel Number — The appellant contends that the environmental review was conducted on the wrong property due to an incorrect Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) listed in the Planning Commission staff report and related resolutions of approval. Staff acknowledges that the staff report included a typographical error. However, this error did not affect the public review process or the Planning Commission's ability to evaluate the correct project site for the following reasons: a. Public Notification — The public notice mailed to surrounding property owners correctly identified the project location by street name and included a location map clearly showing the actual project site at the terminus of Camellia Court. b. Site Posting — The required notice was physically posted on the correct project site prior to the Planning Commission hearing, ensuring that the public had the opportunity to view and verify the correct location in person. As a result, the public was aware of the actual site proposed for development. c. Environmental Review — All environmental documents, including the biological assessment and the CEQA Class 32 exemption justification, accurately referenced the correct parcel and legal description of the property proposed for development. These documents were based on site-specific data collected from the actual project location. d. Public Participation — Approximately 20 residents attended and participated in the Planning Commission hearing, indicating that the incorrect APN reference did not affect public awareness or engagement regarding the proposed project. Challenge Letter: A letter dated June 14, 2025 (Attachment 3), was submitted by the Riverside/San Bernardino Chapter of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS), challenging the City's use of the Class 32 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15332) for the project. CNPS contends that the site contains remnant coastal sage scrub vegetation and may provide habitat for the coastal whiptail lizard, a California Species of Special Concern. Based on these observations, CNPS argues that the project does not qualify for a categorical exemption under CEQA. In response, the City's CEQA consultant, CSG Consultants, issued a letter dated August 5, 2025 (Attachment 4), confirming that the project meets all criteria for the Class 32 exemption. Based on a detailed biological resources assessment and field survey, the consultant concluded that: The project site is primarily disturbed and dominated by non-native and ruderal species, with no suitable habitat present for rare, threatened, or endangered species as defined under CEQA; The potential presence of a SSC, such as the coastal whiptail, does not automatically preclude the exemption, nor does it satisfy the definition of a "rare species" under CEQA Guidelines §15380; There is no substantial evidence that the project would result in significant cumulative impacts, wildfire risks, or other environmental effects that would trigger further CEQA review; Page 4 Page 548 • The project is consistent with CEQA's procedural and substantive requirements for applying a Class 32 exemption. Based on the consultant's review, the City maintains that its use of the Class 32 Categorical Exemption is appropriate and legally supported. Correspondence: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on August 6, 2025, the property was posted on August 6, 2025, and notices were mailed to 90 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on August 5, 2025. To date, staff has received two emails regarding the appeal and are included as Attachment 5. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently subject to annual property taxes, a portion of which is allocated to the City. With the development of the eight single-family residences, the assessed value of the property is expected to increase, resulting in a corresponding increase in the City's annual share of property tax revenue. In addition to the long-term revenue from property taxes, the project proponent will be required to pay one-time development impact fees. These fees are intended to offset the increased demand for City services generated by the new development. The revenue from these fees will support a variety of municipal services, including library services, transportation and drainage infrastructure, animal services, police protection, parks, and community and recreation programs. Overall, the project is expected to have a positive fiscal impact by contributing both ongoing and one-time revenues to support essential City services and infrastructure. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed project supports several of the City Council's core values, including the commitment to providing 5and nurturing a high quality of life for all residents and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. By adding eight well-designed single-family homes on an underutilized parcel, the development contributes to the City's goal of responsible growth while helping to address the ongoing need for for-sale housing. The project represents a thoughtful infill opportunity that enhances neighborhood character and supports long-term community vitality. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Planning Commission Staff Report, Exhibits, Resolution of Approval & COA Attachment 2 —Appeal Letter dated May 22, 2025 Attachment 3— Letter from the CNPS dated June 14, 2025 Attachment 4 — Response Letter to CNPS Comments dated August 5, 2025 Attachment 5— Emails received from Ted Myerchin dated August 10, 2025 Attachment 6— City Council Resolution No. 2025-064 Page 5 Page 549 �Pm . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 14, 2025 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT& DESIGN REVIEW—STUDIO ROCA —A request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone, Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024- 00174). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution of approval for Design Review DRC2024-00174, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: The related Tentative Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990 (Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 90-114), authorizing the subdivision of the 4.78-acre site into eight single-family residential lots and the extension of the public street, Camelia Court. The Final Map was subsequently approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992 (City Council Resolution of Approval 92-171). The current application pertains solely to the design and construction of the proposed residences on the previously approved lots. No changes to the previously approved tentative map are proposed. The 4.78-acre project area, consisting of 8 individual legal parcels is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, east of Beryl Street. The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet east-west and 700 feet north-south, with a significant topographic slope of about 49 feet from northeast (2,179 feet) to southwest (2,130 feet). Vegetation along the perimeter is routinely cleared in accordance with fire protection regulations. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: ATTACHMENT 1 Page 550 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Semi-Rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor West Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences ANALYSIS: Project Design and Layout The project consists of eight single-family residences on individual, previously approved lots, all accessed via a previously approved extension of the existing public street, Camellia Court, in accordance with the approved final tract map. Although the final map was approved prior to the adoption of the current 200-foot lot depth requirement within the subject VL zone, each lot maintains a minimum depth of approximately 150 feet, consistent with the development standards in effect at the time of approval of the final map. All lots exceed 20,000 square feet in area, meeting the current minimum lot size required to keep horses. Potential corral locations have been identified for each lot pursuant to Development Code Section 17.120.020-4g. Due to the significant grade changes at the rear of some properties, stairs will be constructed to facilitate access to the equestrian trail for maintenance purposes. For lots where direct equestrian trail access is not feasible, a shared access trail will be provided between Lots 4 and 5, ensuring continuous connectivity to the larger equestrian trail network. o ar� V n � i x � Figure 1: Site/Landscape Plan Page 2 of 7 Page 551 Architecture The proposed residences feature a contemporary interpretation of traditional architectural styles, blending classic forms with modern materials and detailing. Each home incorporates a variety of finish materials and color schemes to create visual interest and architectural distinction throughout the development. Building materials include stucco, wood-look cementitious siding in both vertical and horizontal applications, stone veneer accents, standing seam metal roofing, and frosted glass and metal garage doors. This combination of textures and finishes contributes to a cohesive yet varied streetscape, enhancing the neighborhood's overall character and aesthetic appeal. Figure 2: Colored Elevation House Size and Configuration The proposed residences range in size from 4,256 square feet for single-story homes to 5,584 square feet for two-story homes. The project includes two single-story and six two-story residences, meeting the 25 percent single-story requirement in accordance with Development Code Section 17.17.122.1-a. Each home is designed with a four-car garage that offers sufficient space to accommodate both passenger and recreational vehicle parking. The site layout has been planned to allow for the future development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on each lot, although no ADUs are currently proposed. Compliance with Development Standards The project was designed in compliance with development requirements for the Very Low Residential (VL)Zone and the Hillside Overlay as outlined in Development Code Table 17.36.010- 1A (Development Standards for Residential Zones and Section 17.144.020 (Hillside Development) as shown in the following table: Page 3 of 7 Page 552 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Required Proposed Complies Standard Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES Front Setback 42 Feet 37—45 Feet YES Plus or Minus 5 Feet Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting regarding the design of the eight houses was held on January 9, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School. The developer notified property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site in advance of the meeting. Approximately 30 community members attended, along with the applicant's team and the project planner. During the meeting, the applicant presented the proposed project and addressed community questions related to traffic impacts, cul-de-sac length, sewer connections, sidewalk installation, house sizes, equestrian access, and preservation of views. The applicant noted that the subdivision, including the street extension, was originally approved over 30 years ago and that the fire department had reviewed and approved site access at that time. In addition, the applicant confirmed that the new homes would connect to the existing sewer system on Beryl Street. This extension will provide an opportunity for existing homes on Camelia Court—currently served by individual septic systems—to connect to the public sewer system. Design Review Committee The proposed residential development was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC — Daniels and Boling) on February 18, 2025. Staff provided an overview of the project, and the Committee raised questions regarding equestrian trails, overall site design, garage dimensions, and the project's sewer connection. In response, the applicant explained that equestrian trails would be developed in conformance with the approved tract map along the perimeter of the project site, with planned connections to the existing trail network. They also noted that the garages would be designed to accommodate Page 4 of 7 Page 553 recreational vehicles in addition to multiple passenger vehicles. Furthermore, the applicant confirmed that the project is required to connect to the existing sewer system on Beryl Street. A new sewer line will be installed through Camelia Court, creating an opportunity for existing homes along that street to connect to the public sewer system. Committee members expressed support for the layout of the residences on the approved lots and architectural design. Following the discussion, the Committee voted to advance the project to the full Planning Commission for a final decision. Public Art In accordance with Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code, residential projects with a density of less than four dwelling units per acre are exempt from the requirement to provide public art. The proposed project has a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre, which qualifies it for this exemption. Environmental Assessment Planning staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences on an approved subdivision of a 4.78-acre site. The Class 32 exemption applies to infill developments on sites less than five acres in size that are consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, and which would not result in significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water. To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 exemption report was prepared by CSG Consultants, Inc. in April 2025, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City (refer to Exhibit D — CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water. The Planning Director has reviewed and considered staff's findings and, exercising independent judgment, concurs with the determination that the project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA. Correspondence This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 28, 2025, the property was posted on April 30, 2025, and notices were mailed to 90 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 29, 2025. On May 1, 2025, an email was received from a resident (Nicole Myerchin) which has been included as Exhibit E to this staff report. The email raised a number of questions and concerns which are summarized below with staff's responses. Page 5 of 7 Page 554 1. Neighborhood Compatibility. Ms. Myerchin disputes that the proposed development is compatible with the existing neighborhood, specifically citing the size of garages, number of bedrooms and the number of two-story to single-story residences. Staff has determined that the project complies with the Hillside Design Review and Building Design requirements of the Development Code. The proposed homes reflect a high-quality architectural design, featuring a cohesive palette, durable materials, and consistent detailing, which together promote visual compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The City does not regulate house size beyond established lot coverage and setback standards. There are no standards that limit the number of bedrooms or maximum number of garage parking spaces within a single-family development. 2. Cul-de-Sac Length and Emergency Egress. Ms. Myerchin states that the cul-de-sac is too long for emergency vehicle response and egress. The cul-de-sac extension was approved as part of the original final map in 1990, including review at that time by the Fire District, which has since reconfirmed emergency access adequacy. 3. Pedestrian Safety and Sidewalks. Ms. Myerchin expressed concerns about increased traffic resulting from the extension of Camelia Court to form a cul-de-sac, as well as the lack of sidewalks on the existing, developed portion of the street. The project will result in additional vehicle trips; however, the extension is designed in accordance with City engineering standards and is intended to improve circulation by eliminating the current dead-end condition. The developer is responsible for installing sidewalks, curbs, and gutters within the boundaries of the approved tract map. Improvements to the existing portion of Camelia Court, which lies outside the project boundary, and cannot be required under the nexus provisions of state law as part of this development. All vehicles and pedestrians using the street will remain subject to applicable traffic regulations and safety laws. 4. Stormwater Runoff and Flooding. Ms. Myerchin raises questions about additional water runoff and concern of flooding for existing homes on the south side of the street. The development will include on-site drainage improvements designed in accordance with City engineering standards. The proposed stormwater management plan has undergone technical review and received preliminary approval from the Engineering Department. 5. Water Supply and Fire Protection. Ms. Myerchin asks about adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes.. Water pressure and fire flow requirements have been evaluated and deemed adequate, as confirmed in a letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District dated May 1, 2024. Further, the project has received preliminary approval from the Fire Department who has raised no questions regarding water supply and fire protection. 6. Equestrian Access. Ms. Myerchin raises concerns regarding continued horse trail access. The letter indicates that equestrians may be accessing the Heritage Park equestrian arena across a portion of the project site that, while informally used by equestrian riders, is not designated as an equestrian trail on the approved final map. The approved trail network, as reflected in the final map, includes an extension of the existing equestrian trail easement located behind the homes on the south side of Camelia Court and routes around the project site. Although the approved alignment requires equestrian users to travel around the development, it maintains continuous access and does not obstruct trail connectivity. Furthermore, the trail will be developed to all required city standards. Page 6 of 7 Page 555 7. Wildlife Habitat. Ms. Myerchin expresses disappointment regarding the loss of open space for wildlife. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a biological assessment was conducted as part of the project's environmental review. The assessment identified standard conditions of approval, including pre-construction surveys for nesting birds and burrowing owls prior to grading activities—measures that are commonly required for development projects within the City. The project site is privately owned and designated for residential development under the City's General Plan. No special habitat protections apply beyond the standard CEQA requirements identified in the biological assessment. 8. Construction Impacts. Ms. Myerchin is concerned about construction impacts on quality of life. Short-term construction impacts are temporary and will be regulated through conditions addressing noise, dust control, and restrictions on the days and hours of construction activities per City code. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently subject to annual property taxes, a portion of which is allocated to the City. With the development of the eight single-family residences, the assessed value of the property is expected to increase, resulting in a corresponding increase in the City's annual share of property tax revenue, which is currently $0.05 per$1 in property tax assessed. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed project supports several of the City Council's core values, including the commitment to providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all residents and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. By adding eight well-designed single-family homes on an underutilized parcel, the development contributes to the City's goal of responsible growth while helping to address the ongoing need for for-sale housing. The project represents a thoughtful infill opportunity that enhances neighborhood character and supports long-term community vitality. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Project Location Exhibit B — Project Plans Exhibit C — DRC Comments and Minutes Dated February 18, 2025 Exhibit D — Link to CEQA 15332 Infill Exemption Exhibit E — Email from Resident dated May 1, 2025 Exhibit F — Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 7 Page 556 EXHIBIT B Due to file size,this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Proiect Plans Page 557 Project Location + � .n=Cl�1lJ1 f y� Project Location K � y •; 4W . +� fl!%* aft - � r `� ft { , \ .w- f Y f - Exhibit A Page 558 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS February 18, 2025 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & DESIGN REVIEW — STUDIO ROCA — A request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024-00174). Background: Tentative Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990, for the subdivision of a 4.78-acre project site into 8 single-family lots. The City Council approved the final map on June 3, 1992. The current development application pertains solely to the construction of the proposed residences and does not propose any modifications to the approved map. Site Characteristics: The 4.78-acre project site is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, west of Beryl Street. The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet from east to west and 700 feet from north to south. The site slopes from north to south, with elevations ranging from 2,179 feet at the northeast corner to 2,130 feet at the southwest corner, reflecting a grade change of approximately 49 feet. The site perimeter has been cleared of vegetation for fire protection purposes. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor West Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences Project Design and Layout: The project consists of 8 single-family residences accessed via an extension of the existing public street(Camellia Court), pursuant to the approved final tract map. As the project site lies within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot includes access to an equestrian trail, accessible from either the individual lots and/or Camellia Court. Exhibit C Page 559 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA February 18, 2025 Page 2 The subdivision was finalized prior to the implementation of the current 200-foot lot depth requirement; however, each lot maintains a minimum depth of approximately 150 feet, consistent with the standards in place at the time of final map approval. Each lot exceeds 20,000 square feet in area, meeting the minimum size required for equestrian use. The applicant has delineated potential corral areas on individual lots. Given the substantial grade changes in the rear yards, stairs will provide access to the equestrian trail for maintenance and usability. Due to substandard lot depths (under current requirements) and large grades, equestrian access on some lots will be provided via an equestrian trail between Lots 4 and 5, connecting to Camellia Court. I � I \ I 0 \ X .41 .s . I � r of ,a n....­...E-1-------------- Figure 1: Site/Landscape Plan Architecture: The residences incorporate a contemporary interpretation of traditional architectural design, integrating variations in finish materials and color. Building materials include stucco, wood-look cementitious vertical and horizontal siding, stone veneer, standing seam metal roofs, and frosted glass garage doors. This modern take on traditional architecture blends classic design elements with contemporary materials and finishes, creating visually appealing and functional homes that seamlessly integrate into the surrounding neighborhood. Each residence features a spacious four-car garage, thoughtfully designed to accommodate the parking of recreational vehicles, providing homeowners with added convenience and flexibility. The inclusion of these oversized garages ensures that residents have ample space for vehicle storage while maintaining the aesthetic integrity of the development. Page 560 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA February 18, 2025 Page 3 Furthermore, the layout of the homes has been carefully planned to allow for future expansion, including the potential incorporation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). While ADUs are not part of the current application, the design accommodates their possible addition, offering residents the opportunity in the future. Figure 2: Colored Elevations House Size and Configuration: The residences range from 4,256 square feet (single-story) to 5,584 square feet (two-story), with 2 single-story and 6 two-story residences, thereby satisfying the 25% single-story requirement per Development Code Section 17.17.122.1-a. Each residence includes a 4-car garage of sufficient dimensions to accommodate a recreational vehicle. Potential accessory dwelling unit (ADU) locations are indicated on lots with single-story floor plans; however,ADUs are not included in the current application. Compliance with Development Standards: The project was designed in compliance with development requirements for the Very Low Residential (VL)Zone and the hillside overlay as outlined in Development Code Table 17.36.010- 1A (Development Standards for Residential Zones and Section 17.144.020 (Hillside Development) as shown in the following table: Page 561 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA February 18, 2025 Page 4 COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Required Proposed Complies Standard Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES Front Setback 42 Feet 37 —45 Feet YES Plus or Minus 5 Feet Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School on January 9, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. The developer notified property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Approximately 30 community members attended, along with the applicant's team and the project planner. The applicant presented the project and addressed questions concerning traffic, cul-de- sac length, sewer connections, sidewalks, house sizes, equestrian access, and views. The applicant clarified that the subdivision was approved over 30 years ago, with the fire department approving access at the time of approval. Staff Recommendation: Based on the project's compliance with zoning regulations, thoughtful architectural design, and future flexibility for ADUs, staff recommends approval of the proposed development. The project meets all development requirements and is consistent with the General Plan vision for the development of infill lots. Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below: x❑Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. Page 562 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA February 18, 2025 Page 5 ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. El Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Sean McPherson, Principal Planner Exhibit A— Project Plans Page 563 Design Review Committee Meeting Agenda February 18, 2025 DRAFT MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 New Time: 6:00 p.m. A. Call to Order The meeting of the Design Review Committee held on February 18, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Sean McPherson, Staff Coordinator, at 6:02 p.m. Design Review Committee members present: Vice Chairman Boling and Commissioner Daniels Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner B. Public Communications Staff Coordinator opened the public communication and after noting there were no public comments, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2024. Item C1. Motion carried 2-0 vote as presented. D. Project Review Items D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT&DESIGN REVIEW—STUDIO ROCA—A request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map (Tract 14644) at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential (VL) Zone and the Equestrian Overlay; APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332— Infill Development Projects (Design Review DRC2024-00174). The Committee members raised several questions related to trails, overall design, the interior dimensions of the garages, and the project's connection to the sewer system. The applicant clarified that equestrian trails would be constructed along the perimeter of the project site, with planned connections to the existing trail network. They also stated that the garages would be designed to accommodate recreational vehicles as well as multiple passenger vehicles. Additionally, the project is required to connect to the existing sewer system located on Beryl Street. A new sewer line will be installed through Camelia Court, providing the opportunity for existing homes along Camelia Court to connect to the sewer system. Committee members expressed support for the site layout and architectural design. Following the discussion, the Committee voted to advance the project to the full Planning Commission for a final decision. Recommended approval to PC. 2-0 Vote. Page 564 E. Adjournment Principal Planner McPherson adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Page 565 EXHIBIT D Due to file size,this attachment can be accessed through the following link: CEQA 15332 Infill Exemption Page 566 From:Nicole Myerchin<nmyerchin@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,May 1,2025 6:14 PM To:Van Der Zwaag,Tabe Rabe.VanderZwaag@cityofrc.us> Subject:Public hearing comment on 5/14/2025 and request to speak at meeting you don'roften net email from nmvertM1inOemail.com.Learn why this CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. Hello, This is Nicole Myerchin and I would like to both speak at the public hearing and submit comments in writing. Dear Mayor and City Council, There are a number of reasons this project should not be approved. 1.It is not consistent with the other existing housing on the street.The cityjust denied a neighbor the right to put a composite roof on his house because it"wasn't consistent with the design of the other homes".All the homes on the street currently have 3 car garages.The developer plans to put in homes with 6 car garages..twice as big.The homes now are predominantly 3-4 bedrooms.The developer's plans are for 6 bedroom homes,again,not consistent with the surrounding homes.Most of the existing homes are single story with a few two story.The developer is putting in all two story homes with the exception of only 2 one story homes.If the city is concerned enough to deny one neighbor the ability to change his roofing material because it would lack consistency with the other homes,then the same rules should apply to the developer who should have to submit homes that are similar in aesthetics and size to the homes that already exist on the street,and not play favorites just because it is a developer.Someone referred to the new homes designs as"garrish".I agree. 2.Emergency egress and allowed length for a cul de sac.The length of the cul du sac would be extended to exceed appropriate length.Moreover,it would be an evacuation risk since there is only one way in and out via Camellia Ct.The traffic would double.Originally it was assessed as a fire risk and it required a secondary access road.The fire department has granted an exemption,which should be reexamined.Several years ago,when the big fire came through,it moved fast.It looked like the apocalypse up here.Should there be another need for a quick evacuation there should be more than one small road to handle all the homes. 3.Extreme elevated risk to children and pedestrians.Camellia Ct has no sidewalks.Children regularly ride their bikes and play in the street now as it is a dead end.The developer shared that while he will put in curbs and sidewalks in the new portion,he will not be doing that to the entire street,so the children will have no place to play without a much greater risk of being hit by cars since traffic will double on this small road.The developer's mother suggested kids"ride s Exhibit E Page 567 their bikes in their backyards"as a solution.If he is going to remove their safe place to play and where pedestrians regularly walk their dogs,then he should be required to provide sidewalks for the entire length of Camellia Ct on both sides,so children and pedestrians can still enjoy the neighborhood they live in without fear of getting hit by a car. 4.Additional water runoff and flooding of existing homes on the south side of the street.While the developer has stated that the homes will capture much of the water runoff from their roofs,the field of dirt,which absorbs water,will be replaced with a paved street,which will not.Camellia Ct has a grade and the houses on the south side of the street have driveways that slope down and already are subject to flooding as there are no gutters.While the developer plans on adding gutters to the new section of the development,he does not plan on adding gutters to the rest of Camellia Ct, which will get increased water runoff from the paved street.If he is going to add risk to existing homes,he should be required to add gutters to the entire length to help protect existing homes from the inevitable negative ramifications of his development. S.Emergency water pressure dilution.The developer plans to add fire hydrants I assume,and sprinklers in the homes I believe.This may impact the water pressure and availability for existing homes in the area in the event of a fire.More and more homes are being added to the same source of water supply for our current hydrant system.There needs to be additional collection and reserves,so other homes aren't put at risk.This is a fire zone,and we all have seen the catastrophic results of a lack of sufficient water and water pressure Ina large fire. 6.Horse trail access disruption.Currently,horses regularly are ridden to the arena via a dirt path that directly links to the wash.The new development will eliminate that path and require riders to either go around the entire development,or ride their horses up the street to access a way to connect to the wash.This is the equestrian overlay area where people utilize open space for recreation,hiking,horseback riding,etc. 7.Destruction of wildlife habitat.A family of approximately 14 deer have made the end of our street home.All of the neighbors love them.They add a tranquil beauty to our lives and often grace us with their presence in our yards.They live in that field along with sage grouse..adorable quail/partridge looking birds as well as hawks,owls,rabbits,raccoons, coyotes and more. 8.Added frustration,stress,aggravation,noise,dust and dirt/Destruction of peace,quiet and wellbeing.During construction Camellia Ct will be a hellscape of large noisy construction equipment,mnstant clanging of hammers,nerve wrackir g incessant beeping of trucks and interrupted access to our homes,which will be constantly bathed in dust and dirt.But it doesn't and there unfortunately.Once completed,it will be a busy street with more people cremmed into gargantuan houses no doubt housing more than one family.The peace of living on a nice quiet street where we can escape the hustle and bustle and decompress in our sanctuaries that we call home will no longer exist.Our quality of life will be reduced and our stress level increased.No more will the wildlife grace us with their presence.No more will children play in the street and neighbors gather for block parties.The quiet that allows us to shed the stress of the day will be obliterated and replaced by psycho suburbia the very thing we all wanted to get away from and the reason we chose these homes in the first place. In closing,I know how this city works,and a resident asking for help is futile against any developer....they have the money and we are just the taxpayers,but if you are going to approve a development here,it should meet some very basic requirements of.consistent size and design of existing homes;the addition of gutters and sidewalks not just for the new section,but for the entire street so kids can remain safe and people's'homes don't have an increased risk of flooding;a design that doesn't block off the current horse trail access,and preserves some open space for wildlife and recreation;additional emergency water collection and secondary access road to relieve some of the traffic flow and critical resource demand from little Camellia Ct. I was recently in Santa Barbara.It was such a contrast to what is going on here.There was no new development,just so much green,stunningly beautiful open space with lush trees.No high density housing on every stitch of land.No, instead there were rolling hills with walking paths and the people felt different.They were relaxed and they smiled.City planning is more than just pack am and stack am.Good city planning has a huge impact on the 2 Page 568 psychological wellbeing of people.The psychology of how urban development is implemented should play a much bigger role than what it currently does in Rancho Cucamonga.Our streets,post offices,shopping centers,parking lots, heck the entire infrastructure wasn't designed for such a super saturation of housing.Traffic is bumper to bumper and now even people's homes are no longer a sanctuary to escape to. I urge you to reject this development,and at a bare minimum require significant changes to the proposed plan as it stands.If you get a chance,visit Santa Barbara.you won't believe the open space and the peaceful feeling that brings.The value of a quality life is priceless.No developer's money is worth destroying it. Nicole Ntyerchin 909-273-1151 3 Page 569 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2024-00174, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 8 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND ON A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP (TRACT 14644) AT THE TERMINUS OF CAMELLIA COURT IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (VL)ZONE AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31. A. Recitals. 1. Studio Roca filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2024-00174,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of May 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 14, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 4.78-acre project site is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, east of Beryl Street; and b. The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet from east to west and 700 feet from north to south.The site slopes from north to south,with elevations ranging from 2,179 feet at the northeast corner to 2,130 feet at the southwest corner, reflecting a grade change of approximately 49 feet; and C. The subject design review is related to Tentative Tract Map 14644, which was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990 (Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 90-114), authorizing the subdivision of the 4.78-acre site into eight single-family residential lots. The Final Map was subsequently approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992 (City Council Resolution of Approval 92-171). The current application pertains solely to the design and construction of the proposed residences. No changes to the previously approved tentative map are proposed; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Exhibit F Page 570 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014 DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA May 14, 2025 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor West Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences e. Approval is for the design review and site layout of 8 single-family residences;and f. The project complies with each of the development standards for the Very Low (VL) Conventional Zone as shown in the following table: COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Required Proposed Complies Standard Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES Front Setback 42 Feet 37 —45 Feet YES Plus or Minus 5 Feet Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES Page 571 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014 DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA May 14, 2025 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which designates the project site as Semi-Rural Neighborhood.This designation permits the development of single-family residences at a maximum density of up to six units per acre. The project proposes eight single- family residences, resulting in a density of 1.67 units per acre, which is well within the allowable density range; and b. The proposed use is in alignment with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project site is situated within the Very Low (VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay. The Very Low Residential District is intended for single-family residences at a maximum density of two dwelling units per acre. The proposed project, with a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre, complies with the zoning district requirements and supports the district's objectives; and c. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code. Located within the Very Low(VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay, the project adheres to the relevant development standards outlined in the code. All requirements, including those related to setbacks, lot sizes, and design standards, have been met; and d. The proposed use,together with the conditions of approval,will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. A CEQA Section 15332 exemption was prepared for the project, demonstrating that it will not result in significant environmental impacts related to biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332—Infill Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences on a 4.78-acre site. The Class 32 exemption applies to infill developments on sites less than five acres in size that are consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, and which would not result in significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water. To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 exemption report was prepared by CSG Consultants, Inc. in April 2025, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City(referto Exhibit D—CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, and air quality. The Planning Commission reviewed staff's determination of exemption and based on their independent judgment, concurs with staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Page 572 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 25-014 DR DRC2024-00174 — STUDIO ROCA May 14, 2025 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 2025. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Morales, Chairman ATTEST: Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 2023, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 573 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The project shall comply to all the Conditions of Approval included in the Section 15332 Categorical Exemption Memorandum dated April 16, 2025 attached as Exhibit D to the approval for DRC2024-00174. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/28/2025 Page 574 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively "Indemnitees"), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director's actions, the Planning Commission's actions, and/or the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12 Page 575 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 14. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 16. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 12 Page 576 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 18. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 19. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In-Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 12 Page 577 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department Cucamonga Valley Water District San Bernardino County Flood Control 5. This tract is required to be annexed into CFD 2022-01 district (Street Lighting Services) to finance the maintenance and services of streetlights, traffic lights, and appurtenant facilities. This condition needs to be completed before the Final Map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Any annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. To start the annexation process, please contact Kelly Guerra at 909-774-2582 6. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name : Camellia Street Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees EquestrianTrail Note: Sidewalk to be constructed to property line adjacent. 7. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. f. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 12 Page 578 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 10. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 11. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 12 Page 579 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction materials and methods are required to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. Please include this note on the plans. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section of this case file in the Online Permit Center. 3. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. A site-specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. The fire protection plan is required to be submitted and approved prior to the Fire District approving the project as a whole. 4. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Landscaping, vegetation management, fuel reduction, and other wildland fire safety features and practices are required to comply with all applicable provisions of the Fire Protection Plan and Vegetation Management and Landscaping sections of Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. A complete and approved defensible space plan is required prior to the Fire District approving the project as a whole. 5. The approved fire protection plan is required to be recorded on the parcel. Upload proof of recording to this project file and notify the Fire District of recording by sending an email with verification to RCFire@CityofRC.us 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with noncombustible 4-inch tall numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 7. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 8. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 9. All requirements of the FPP or the RCFPD Standard must be completed before an occupancy release may be granted. 10. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12 Page 580 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 12. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 13. The Current editions of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance, the California Residential Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in all Buildings with R and U occupancy fire areas. All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D, 13R or 13. 14. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards. b. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. c. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. 15. Single-family residential sales model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. 16. Combustible construction materials, including combustible roofing materials, are prohibited from being onsite prior to a water supply system in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10 being provided in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section of this project in the Online Permit Center. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 12 Page 581 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 7. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Engineering Services Department an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 11. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 Page 582 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 14. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 15. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 16. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 17. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 18. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 19. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 12 Page 583 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12 Page 584 Project#: DRC2024-00174 Project Name: Alta Loma 8 Location: 14644 TRACT- 106138131-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES - CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE - Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. 22. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES - CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE - Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed:4/28/2025 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12 Page 585 Dr. Azzawi 9176 Whirlaway Ct Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 dralazzawi@gmail.com RECENED 909-322-8273 5/21/2025 MAY -2 2 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga CITY CLERK City Council CITYOFRANCHOCUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Concerned Community's Appeal of the Approval for 8 New Residential Homes at Tract 14644/APN 1061-3 81-24 thru 31-0000 Dear City Council, I am writing on behalf of myself and our neighbors who are deeply concerned about the recent approval to build 8 new two-story homes at the end of Camellia Court. While we understand development is part of growth, we strongly believe that this project, as approved, could significantly impact our neighborhood's safety, environment, and the very qualities that make our community special. In particular, I want to share a recent experience that highlights the importance of preserving what we love about our area. During yesterday's community meeting, residents watched and listened as four deer slowly wandered along the end of Camellia Court, right where children often play, walk, and explore. For many ofus,these creatures symbolize the connection to nature that we cherish-an experience that our kids will grow up without if more development encroaches on this land. It made us realize how precious and fragile our natural habitat is, and how development can threaten to erase those peaceful moments. Alongside this,we have witnessed several dangerous traffic incidents in our neighborhood. Not long ago, a car lost control and ran through the comer of Camellia and Beryl, crashing into the house on that comer. Such incidents underscore the risk of increased traffic on streets that are already narrow, with no sidewalks and limited safety features. Currently, the small community has an average of just 3 cars per household, but with 8 more homes, this could mean more than two dozen additional vehicles crisscrossing our streets. That not only increases congestion but also the liability and danger for children playing nearby-the very reason we need safer roads and traffic calming measures. There are a number of reasons this project should not be approved. 1. It is not consistent with the other existing housing on the street. The city just denied a neighbor the right to put a composite roof on his house because it "wasn't consistent with the design of the other homes". All the homes on the street currently have 3 car garages. The 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 586 developer plans to put in homes with 6 car garages...twice as big.The homes now are predominantly 3-4 bedrooms.The developer's plans are for 6-bedroom homes,again,not consistent with the surrounding homes.Most of the existing homes are single story with a few two story.The developer is putting in all two-story homes with the exception of only 2 one story homes.If the city is concerned enough to deny one neighbor the ability to change his roofing material because it would lack consistency with the other homes,then the same rules should apply to the developer who should have to submit homes that are similar in aesthetics and size to the homes that already exist on the street,and not play favorites just because it is a developer. Someone referred to the new homes designs as"garish".I agree. 2.Emergency egress and allowed length for a cut de site.The length of the cut du an would be extended to exceed appropriate length.Moreover,it would be an evacuation risk since there is only one way in and out via Camellia Cc The traffic would double.Originally it was assessed as a fire risk and it required a secondary access road.The fire department has granted an exemption,which should be reexamined.Several years ago,when the-big fire came through,it moved fast.It looked like the apocalypse up here.Should there be another need for a quick evacuation there should be more than one small road to handle all the homes. 3.Extreme elevated risk to children and pedestrians.Camellia Ct has no sidewalks.Children regularly ride their bikes and play in the street now as it is a dead end.The developer shared that while he will put in curbs and sidewalks in the new portion,he will not be doing that to the entire street,so the children will have no place to play without a much greater risk of being hit by cars since traffic will double on this small road.The developer's mother suggested kids"ride their bikes in their backyards"as a solution. ]the is going to remove their safe place to play and where pedestrians regularly walk their dogs,then he should be required to provide sidewalks for the entire length of Camellia Ct on both sides,so children and pedestrians can still enjoy the neighborhood they live in without fear of getting hit by a car. 4.Additional water runoff and flooding of existing homes on the south side of the street.While the developer has stated that the homes will capture much of the water ruooff from their roofs, the field of dirt,which absorbs water,will be replaced with a paved street,which will not. Camellia Ct has a grade and the houses on the south side of the street have driveways that slope down and already are subject to flooding as there are no drains.While the developer plans on adding drains to the new section of the development,he does not plan on adding drains to the rest of Camellia Ct,which will get increased water runoff from the paved street.If he is going to add risk to existing homes,he should be required to add drains to the entire length to help protect existing homes from the inevitable negative ramifications of his development. 5.Emergency water pressure dilution.The developer plans to add fire hydrants I assume,and sprinklers in the homes I believe.This may impact the water pressure and availability for existing homes in the area in the event of a fire.More and more homes are being added to the same source of water supply for our current hydrant system.There needs to be additional collection and reserves,so other homes aren't put at risk.This is a fire zone,and we all have seen the catastrophic results of a lack of sufficient water and water pressure in a large fire. 2 Page 587 6.Horse trail access disruption.Currently,horses regularly are ridden to the arena via a dirt path that directly links to the wash.The new development will eliminate that path and require riders to either go around the entire development,or ride their horses up the street to access a way to connect to the wash.This is the equestrian overlay area where people utilize open space for recreation,hiking,horseback riding,etc. 7.Destruction ofwildlife habitat.A family ofapproximately 14 deer have made the end ofour street home.All ofthe neighbors love them.They add a tranquil beauty to our lives and often grace us with their presence in our yards.They live in that field along with sage grouse... adorable quaillpartridge looking birds as well as hawks,owls,rabbits,raccoons,coyotes and 8.Added frustration,stress,aggravation,noise,dust and dirt/Destruction of peace,quiet and wellbeing.During construction Camellia Ct will be a hellscape of large noisy construction equipment,constant clanging of hammers,nerve wracking incessant beeping of trucks and interrupted access to our homes,which will be constantly bathed in dust and din.But it doesn't end there unfortunately.Once completed,it will be a busy street with more people crammed into gargantuan houses—no doubt housing more than one family.The peace of living on a nice quiet street where we can escape the hustle and bustle and decompress in our, sanctuaries that we call home will no longer exist.Our quality of life will be reduced and our stress level increased.No more will the wildlife grace us with their presence.No more will children play in the street and neighbors gather for block parties.The quiet that allows us to shed the stress ofthe day will be obliterated and replaced by psycho suburbia...the very thing we all wanted to get away from and the reason we chose these homes in the first place. 9.An incorrect APN#was given to the public.We met with a representative at the State of California Fish and Wild Life on May 22,2025 and he said there is no record of any study done on the correct land in question.The APN number that has been posted is not in fact the proposed tract or lot of concern.That APN is a lot with built homes below the 210 fwy.The correct land has no ecology study that has been done. 10.The propose land was exempted by class 32 which we question for several reasons.Number one,the environmental study was done on the wrong parcel APN number.Number two,the contractor/owner was allowed to use the bulldozer in the middle ofthe land before obtaining the city reports or ecology report.This resulted in destroying the evidence for the class 32 exemption.We urged the city to stop the owner in destroying the land and the evidence. In closing,I know how this city works,and a resident asking for help is futile against any developer....they have the money and we are just the taxpayers,but ifyou are going to approve a development here,it should meet some very basic requirements of.consistent size and design of existing homes;the addition of drains and sidewalks not just for the new section,but for the entire street so kids can remain safe and people's'homes don't have an increased risk of flooding; a design that doesn't block off the current horse trail access,and preserves some open space for wildlife and recreation;additional emergency water collection and secondary access road to relieve some of the traffic flow and critical resource demand from little Camellia Ct. 3 Page 588 The current conditions pose significant risks,and we're genuinely worried about what will happen if the additional homes arc built without adequate safeguards.Our streets are already stressful for pedestrians and parents with young children.We need the city to carefully reevaluate the impact this development will have-and to prioritize our safety,environment,and community character. I was recently in Santa Barbara.It was such a contrast to what is going on here.There was no new development,just so much green,stunningly beautiful open space with lush trees.No high- density housing on every stitch of land.No,instead there were rolling hills with walking paths and the people felt different.They were relaxed and they smiled.City planning is more than just pack em and stack em.Good city planning has a huge impact on the psychological wellbeing of people.The psychology of how urban development is implemented should play a much bigger role than what it currently does in Rancho Cucamonga. Our streets,post offices,shopping centers,parking lots,heck the entire infrastructure wasn't designed for such a super saturation of housing.Traffic is bumper to bumper and now even people's homes are no longer a sanctuary to scape to. I urge you to reject this development,and at a bare minimum require significant changes to the proposed plan as it stands.If you get a chance,visit Santa Barbara. You won't believe the open space and the peaceful feeling that brings.The value ofa quality life is priceless.No developer's money is worth destroying it. We love our neighborhood as it is-a place where children can grow up safely,explore nature, and enjoy a peaceful environment We hope the city will act in the best interest of its residents and work with us to find a responsible path forward. Thank you for your time and understanding.We look forward to your response. Wamr regards, AlF Dr AS aw - Community Group or Neighborhood 4 Page 589 (' Invoice Summary RANCHO Studio ROCA Inc. InwicaR 20483] cortlp ORC2025-00130-PC Appeal Project Address: 16606 TRACT Invoice Date. 05I222025 App I— R h6 Odiz Sludio ROCA Inc. owner ALTA LOMA BLLC Fee Rem Fee Antl Fee PA Belem GL Cotle Trana C.. Appeal W a Planning Commis.bn $3,66100 $0.00 $3,661.00 F001CC314RC63000603 Oe mm T nobgy Fee $n.00 $0.00 $439.00 F020CC301 RC43064103 General Plan Maintenance Fee $58200 $0.00 $562.00 F016CCOOORC W24 03 Total Fee: $6,682.00 $OAO $g,662.00 avtor(sl w Clry o Clry B m(wn M approp eta uce s gg rylreaasaed o�Ma type W wp�Mroba pedormedl P. lopul ga Bul 69­l.Failure loproduce�Ma�Mo�mallan roll delaypermnisauance. xxw.ClryoiRC.us Page 590 Riverside/San Bernardino Chapter CALIFORNIA NAT1vF [SLANT SOCIETY June 14, 2025 Re: Use of Categorical Exemption 32 for Alta Loma 8 Project Submitted electronically to: Rancho Cucamonga Associate Planner,Tabe van der Zwaag,tabe.vanderzwaag cityofrc.us CC:john.gillison@cityofrc.us Dear Tabe van der Zwaag, The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Riverside/San Bernardino Chapter of California Native Plant Society("CNPS") on the use of a Notice of Exemption for the Alta Loma 8 Project. CNPS is a non-profit environmental organization with 13,000 members in 36 Chapters across California and Baja California, Mexico. CNPS's mission is to protect California's native plant heritage and preserve it for future generations through the application of science, research, education, and conservation. CNPS works closely with decision-makers, scientists, communities, and local planners to advocate for well-informed policies, regulations, and land management practices. We respectfully provide the following comments on the City's inappropriate use of Categorical Exemption Class 32 to bypass normal environmental assessment and disclosure requirements to develop 4.78 acres of natural land containing California native plant species which support natural wildlife including one documented Species of Special Concern (SSC) as designated by the State of California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The City staff determined that this project"qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332—Infill Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences on a 4.78-acre site." This project is not exempt from CEQA for several reasons, but our comments will be limited to the following: 1. Class 32 specifically DOES NOT apply to infill projects if the"infill"project site has native vegetation and/or if the project site has rare,threatened, or endangered species that are being supported by the native vegetation (see 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15332(c)). In this case, substantial native vegetation (coastal sage scrub) is present and at least one rare species is known to be present and was documented by a CNPS biologist on 6/12/2025. The coastal whiptail.(Aspidoscelis tigris subspecies stejnegeri) is a long medium-sized lizard and at least two individuals are present and occupying the project site (see photo documentation below).The coastal whiptail is designated as a Species of Special Concern 1 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 591 by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and is included in the most updated version of the State's special animals list'. Species of Special Concern are candidates for listing under the California Endangered Species Act and presence of an SSC automatically disqualifies the use of any categorical exemption under CEQA(see 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15332(c)). Furthermore, impacts to this species and it's habitat would constitute a"significant impact" under CEQA which requires the City to make a finding that the project is likely to have a significant impact on the environment and require the incorporation of avoidance or mitigation measures to offset the impact(s). 2. The use of Class 32 is also disqualified if there is a reasonable possibility that the project will contribute to cumulative impacts (14 Cal Code Regs §15300.2(b).Again, because project site supports native habitat consisting of natural plant communities, it is inferred that cumulative impacts should at a minimum be assessed and discussed as required under CEQA. 3. Courts have invalidated the use of Categorical exemptions for residential development projects in high severity fire zones (See Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 11)wherein potential impacts associated with wildfire risk must be assessed and discussed beyond what is required (or rather not required) under an exemption.This is especially critical given the catastrophic fires that were witnessed earlier this year in Los Angeles County. The project site is within the updated designated high fire hazard severity zone(see Figure 1 below). In conclusion, it is unquestionably clear that Categorical Exemption Class 32 nor any statutory or categorical exemption for that matter can appropriately apply to this project as proposed.We request that the City re-evaluate its approach to assessing and determining environmental impacts for this project.We recommend that the City address the clear potential for significant impacts and incorporate avoidance and/or mitigation measures as it may relate to native habitat and the presence of sensitive species and cumulative impacts associated with removing native habitat. Additionally and finally,we request the land owner immediately cease to remove native vegetation which is supporting rare animal species and nesting birds on the property until all CEQA approvals, entitlements, and permits have been issued.We request that the City,as the lead agency,enforce this request against the landowner.We documented the recent removal of several acres of natural vegetation during the bird nesting season within the project area, presumably conducted by or at the direction of the property owner.This is a substantial violation of the CEQA process and can introduce irreversible future problems with adequate evaluation and disclosure of environmental impacts related to the present biology of the project site. ' CNDDB_Special_Animals_List.pdf 2 Page 592 HazardFigure 1. CalFire High Fire Severity Zones. Project Location • in blue. Fire Hazard Severity 7on es Class Ih Vety High(Recommended) High Moderate y�! ri ►- r �. �•. r. ..6 `.-� ! ; .. .���1 - ,�� .�,r-aye„- iy���i �' � �. �, • �y .�: x.� •„+, �. Y .F I ��.P ��:_a �-� �W xi.• r � a .� ,r.�_,. I� ' � a — er sj=. .�f,i�iyV.� � f��,i�,. #+: Page 593 Photo Sequence 1. Coastal whiptaiI documented within mowed dead California buckwheat plants within the project site 1 v * \ 4-AOV- 1 Sincerely, Aaron Echols, Conservation Chair, Riverside/San Bernardino Chapter, California Native Plant Society r 4 Page 594 ELMT Fy-I Fv1 CONTUTINT August 5,2025 CSG CONSULTANTS Contact: Kelli Allen Via Email:kellia(a,csgen rg com SUBJECT: Response to the California Native Plant Society Comment Letter for the Proposed Alta Loma Residences Project(June 14,2025) The following responses address comments received by the Riverside/San Bernardino Chapter of California Native Plant Society("CNPS")on the use of a Notice of Exemption for the Alta Loma 8 Project in the letter dated June 14,2025. We appreciate the concerns raised regarding the City's determination to apply the Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA(14 CCR§15332)for this infill project.However,we respectfully offer the following clarifications and rebuttals in response to the claims made: 1) CEQA Guidelines §15332(c), states that a Class 32 exemption cannot be used if"the project site has value as habitat for endangered,rare or threatened species."It does not prohibit the use of the exemption for all sites with native vegetation or with the presence of a Species of Special Concern(SSC)unless that species qualifies as"rare"under CEQA. Under CEQA Guidelines §15380, a species must meet specific criteria to be considered "rare," "threatened,"or"endangered."While the coastal whiptail(Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri) is designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as a SSC,this designation alone does not elevate the species to the level of a CEQA"rare species"or indicate that its presence necessarily gives the site significant habitat value under§15332. Recent court cases support this interpretation.In Nassiri v.City of Lafayette(2024),the court upheld the use of a Class 32 exemption despite the presence of bird species listed as "Species of Conservation Concern,"concluding that such designations alone did not constitute sufficient evidence of"rare"species or significant habitat value.The court emphasized that the detennination must be supported by substantial evidence—which,in this case,includes the City's review of the biological conditions of the site and expert analysis that the site does not support endangered,rare,or threatened species as defined under CEQA. In accordance with the CDFWs Special Animals List(July 2025),coastal whiptail is listed as a SSC with a Global Rank of G5T5 and a State Rank of S3.The Global G5 ranking refers to the whole species(i.e., Aspidoscelis tigris)while the T5 ranking refers to the subspecies stejnegeri. The G5T5 ranking means the species is "Secure" with very low risk of extinction due to a very extensive range, abundant "Responsible Planning Through Environmental Leadership" 2201 N.Grand Avenue#10098 1 Santa Ana,CA 92711-0098 1 (714)716-5050 ATTACHMENT 4 www.ELMTConsulting com Page 595 August 5,2025 Page 2 populations or occurrences,and little to no concern from declines or threats.The State S3 ranking means the species is"Vulnerable"and is at a moderate risk of extirpation in the state due to a fairly restricted range,relatively few populations or occurrences,recent and widespread declines,threats,or other factors. Furthermore, SSC are not candidates for listing under the California Endangered Species Act(CESA) and do not receive the same protections. While both SSCs and CESA candidate species indicate an elevated level of attention regarding a species' conservation status, only candidate species are granted interim protections similar to those provided to listed threatened or endangered species. SSCs do not receive any legal protection under CESA. These are separate designations with distinctly different regulatory implications.The SSC designation is an administrative tool to focus conservation efforts and stimulate research on poorly known species, with the goal of preventing further decline and potential listing. Additionally,the claim that the presence of a SSC automatically disqualifies the use of any categorical exemption is incorrect.CEQA does not impose a blanket prohibition on the use of categorical exemptions based solely on the presence of an SSC. 2) Under CEQA Guidelines§15300.2(b),exceptions to exemptions apply only when there is a"reasonable possibility" that the project will contribute to significant cumulative impacts. The limited scale of the project (eight single-family homes on an infill parcel surrounded by existing development and disturbances) does not constitute a significant contributor to regional habitat loss or other cumulative environmental effects. Further, the site is located within a largely urbanized area, consistent with the criteria for infill development under §15332. The site does not support regional wildlife corridors or uniquely high biological diversity warranting a full cumulative impact analysis. The cumulative loss of native vegetation must be assessed in context,and in this case,the area is not part of a larger undeveloped habitat block. Therefore, no substantial evidence has been presented to support the claim that this project will result in significant cumulative impacts. 3) The case cited(Sierra Club v.County of Sonoma(2017))involved circumstances where the lead agency failed to consider evidence of significant fire risk and failed to apply applicable fire codes and mitigation standards. That case does not establish a blanket rule against the use of Class 32 in High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Fire safety standards will be addressed through compliance with the California Building Code,local fire ordinances, and Fire Department conditions of approval, including vegetation management, defensible space,and access requirements. These requirements are independent of CEQA and ensure that wildfire risks are mitigated at the project design and permitting stage. CEQA does not preclude exemptions in fire zones; rather, it requires showing that the project will not result in significant environmental effects. In this case,no substantial evidence has been presented that the project will result in significant wildfire-related impacts beyond what is addressed through standard regulatory requirements. R0 ELCONS�MT Page 596 August 5,2025 Page 3 4) CEQA is not an enforcement tool for pre-entitlement activities unless a project has been improperly segmented or implemented in violation of CEQA's procedural requirements. There is no evidence that the City has approved or directed unpermitted vegetation clearing in violation of CEQA. To the extent that any vegetation clearing occurred during bird nesting season, such activity is subject to separate jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Additionally,the City's determination that the project qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption is based on the site's environmental conditions at the time of approval. This determination relies on a site- specific biological assessment,rather than generalized habitat mapping or anecdotal observations. Conclusion The claims presented do not provide substantial evidence that the proposed infill project fails to meet the requirements of CEQA Guidelines§15332. Specifically: • The presence of an SSC does not automatically preclude the exemption; • The site has no habitat value for endangered,rare,or threatened species as defined under CEQA; o Based on the analysis above, coastal whiptail is not considered a"rare" species, and does not satisfy the§15380"rare"definition. • No substantial evidence exists of significant cumulative or wildfire-related impacts;and • The City has complied with all procedural and substantive CEQA requirements in evaluating the exemption. Therefore,the City's determination to use the Class 32 Categorical Exemption is consistent with CEQA. If you have further questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact Travis at (909) 816-1646 or travismcgill&elmtconsulting com. Sincerely, Travis J. McGill Director/Biologist R0 ELCONS�MT Page 597 From: Planning,City FW: Opposition to the approval of development at the end of Camellia Court Subject: Monday,August 11,2025 7:23:22 AM Date: From:Ted Myerchin <ted.myerchin@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2025 2:13 PM To: Planning, City<City.Planning@cityofrc.us> Subject: Opposition to the approval of development at the end of Camellia Court You don't often get email from ted.myerchin ckgmailxom.Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. This is Ted Myerchin, and I am submitting my comments of opposition to the proposed development at the end of Camellia Ct. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, There are a number of reasons this project should not go through. 1. It should have a second access point if it is going to be developed due to the length of the cut du sac. The area is subject to fire, and it burned in 2003. For both safety and traffic reasons a second access point should be a requirement for that development. 2. Three children have already been hit by cars on the corner of Falling Tree and Camellia Ct since I have lived here. Seldom does anyone stop at the stop sign on Falling Tree where it intersects with Camellia Ct. With an increase in traffic and E-bikes, and no sidewalks on the existing part of Camellia Ct, there will be more children injured. That corner will be a disaster. 3. The quality of life for existing residents will be diminished significantly. There will be increased traffic on the small road of Camellia Ct with nowhere for children to play and no sidewalks on the existing part of the street to get them safely to the park as an alternative. 4. Disbursement of wildlife. There are deer that are frequently in that field and come in our yards.. People bring their kids from the surrounding area to see the deer, and they are important to the neighborhood. We also have owls, hawks, bobcats, quail, roadrunners, rabbits, coyotes and other wildlife who live in that field and that we enjoy having. 5. The length of the cul du sac will exceed both the city and county max cul du sac length, which is listed as 600 feet. From Falling Tree to the end of the street is already 460ft, and the developer plans to add at least another 500ft, which will bring it to 960ft. Attachment 5 Page 598 6. Houses are so large that they will possibly attract multiple families or Air BNBs, which will further increase traffic on Camellia Ct. Moreover, the size of these houses is not consistent with the rest of the street. The proposed homes are twice as large as the existing homes with six car garages (4 car garage plus an additional RV garage) and six bedrooms. 7. New home residents will have to put up with flies and odor of horse excrement as they will be close to existing horse property. 8. People living on the south side of Camellia already get water running into their garages when we get heavy rain. There will be more water running down Camellia if this development goes through, which will put those houses at a greater risk of flooding and damage since there are no drains on the existing part of Camellia Ct. The developer should not be able to make a financial gain at the expense of existing homeowners. 9. My daughter and I spoke with the developer a couple of weeks before he closed escrow, and he said he would hook up the existing homes on Camellia Ct to the new sewer line for half the normal cost, but he has already reneged on that promise. 10. Some of the neighbors such as myself have compromised health issues that will be impacted by all the dirt and dust that will be stirred up when they rip up the street to put in the sewer line. Cost to clean our homes and pools will increase during construction with all the dirt and dust that will be stirred up. 11. Since Camellia is our only way in and out, many of the residents will have their work impacted when the street is torn apart. My daughter works on a day rate and has a very time sensitive job where she has to be in Los Angeles in under two hours at any given time. If she is unable to meet that requirement, she will have to decline work which would be a significant loss in wages for her. Again, the developer's gain should not be at the expense of the existing residents, and he should have to reimburse residents who are cut off during the time the street is torn up. 12. The city is leaving no place for people to unwind and enjoy nature. The city is packing us in like rats. 13. The development is in the equestrian overlay, which is an area intended for homes with capacity to have horses. It is not an area that was intended to maximize the housing square footage so developers could maximize profits. With homes so large, once the new home owners put in landscaping and a pool, where will they put horses? In the six car garages? When making a decision the city should do like Benjamin Franklin and weigh the pros vs the cons. I only see cons with this proposed development. This project has many more strikes against it. Three strikes and you're out! Sincerely, Ted Myerchin Page 599 From: Nakamura,Jennifer To: Nakamura,Jennifer Subject: FW:Additional reason to reject the proposed development at the east end of Camellia Ct Date: Monday,August 11,2025 2:50:00 PM From:Ted Myerchin <ted.myerchin(@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday,August 10, 2025 10:54 PM To: Planning, City<Cit)I.Planningl@cityofrc.us> Subject:Additional reason to reject the proposed development at the east end of Camellia Ct You don't often get email from ted.myerchin(d)Qmail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe. The new notice dated August 6, 2025 has the same WRONG APN number as the original notice dated April 30, 2025 that Associate Planner Tabe Van Der Zwaag told us was a typo in the original notice. He didn't even bother to put the correct parcel number, and the parcel number listed on the notification is for an entirely different piece of land. I STRONGLY believe if this development is to go forward it should be reposted with the CORRECT APN number. Moreover, a coast whiptail has been found and photographed on this property on June 13, 2025 by Aaron Echols the Conservation Chair of the California Native Plant Society of Riverside-San Bernardino, and it is listed on the "special animals list"for California.Therefore,this development should be denied because of this and all the other reasons we have expressed. Please confirm receipt of this email. Sincerely, Ted Myerchin Page 600 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW DRC2024-00174 - A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 8 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND ON A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP (TRACT 14644) AT THE TERMINUS OF CAMELLIA COURT IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (VL) ZONE AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1061-381-24 THRU 31 A. Recitals. 1. Studio Roca filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2024- 00174, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 14, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 25-014 approving the application and making findings in support of its decision. 3. On May 22, 2025, the City received a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving the application. 4. On August 20, 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal, conducted the public hearing, concluded the hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of the application and making findings in support thereof. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 20, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 4.78-acre project site is located at the terminus of Camellia Court, east of Beryl Street; and b. The irregularly shaped site measures approximately 350 feet from east to west and 700 feet from north to south. The site slopes from north to south, with elevations ranging RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064 - Page 1 of 5 Page 601 from 2,179 feet at the northeast corner to 2,130 feet at the southwest corner, reflecting a grade change of approximately 49 feet; and C. The subject design review is related to Tentative Tract Map 14644, which was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990 (Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 90-114), authorizing the subdivision of the 4.78-acre site into eight single- family residential lots. The Final Map was subsequently approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992 (City Council Resolution of Approval 92-171). The current application pertains solely to the design and construction of the proposed residences. No changes to the previously approved tentative map are proposed; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) North Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences South Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor East Open Space General Open Space and Facilities FC/UC Flood Control/Utility Corridor West Single-Family Semi-rural Neighborhood Very Low (VL) Residences e. Approval is for the design review and site layout of 8 single-family residences; and f. The project complies with each of the development standards for the Very Low (VL) Conventional Zone and Hillside Overlay as shown in the following table: COMPLIANCE TABLE Development Required Proposed Complies Standard Density 2 DU/AC 1.67 DU/AC YES Front Setback 42 Feet 37—45 Feet YES Plus or Minus 5 Feet Side Yard Setback 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 Feet YES Rear Yard 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064- Page 2 of 5 Page 602 Building Height 30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES 3. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which designates the project site as Semi-Rural Neighborhood. This designation permits the development of single-family residences at a maximum density of up to six units per acre. The project proposes eight single-family residences, resulting in a density of 1.67 units per acre, which is well within the allowable density range; and b. The proposed use is in alignment with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project site is situated within the Very Low (VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay. The Very Low Residential District is intended for single-family residences at a maximum density of two dwelling units per acre. The proposed project, with a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre, complies with the zoning district requirements and supports the district's objectives; and c. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code. Located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay, the project adheres to the relevant development standards outlined in the code. All requirements, including those related to setbacks, lot sizes, and design standards, have been met; and d. The City Council has considered all issues raised in the appeal, including concerns related to neighborhood compatibility, environmental effects, public safety, drainage, infrastructure, and quality of life. Based on staff's analysis and the evidence presented, the City Council finds that the proposed project, together with the conditions of approval, will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project qualifies for a CEQA Section 15332 Class 32 infill exemption, and the record demonstrates that it will not result in significant environmental impacts.. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies for a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects, as it involves the construction of eight single-family residences on a 4.78-acre site. The Class 32 exemption applies to infill developments on sites less than five acres in size that are consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, and which would not result in significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water. To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 exemption report was prepared by CSG Consultants, Inc. in April 2025, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064- Page 3 of 5 Page 603 (refer to Exhibit D — CEQA Section 15332 Infill Exemption). Staff reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, and air quality. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings, evidence, and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the appeal (DRC2025-00130) and upholds the Planning Commission's decision to approve Design Review DRC2024-00174 subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-014. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June 2025. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Sevy, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of June 2025. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064- Page 4 of 5 Page 604 ABSTAINED: Executed this 18th day of June 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Kim Sevy, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064- Page 5 of 5 Page 605 2025-08-20—Regular Meeting—Public Hearing Item G2 : Correspondence Received From: Don &Judy Spaulding<idrdon@earthlink.net> Sent:Thursday,August 14, 2025 11:12 AM To:Van Der Zwaag,Tabe<Tabe.VanderZwaag@cityofrc.us> Subject: Development Project by Tyler Miller Dear Staff, I wish to comment at the Council Chambers meeting schedule Wednesday August 20th regarding how I VIGOROUSLY oppose building 8 HUGE houses. This construction will have a negative impact on local wildlife, causing potential flooding during our intense RAINS from lack of drainage, and the design with their 6-car garage, etc does not blend with existing neighborhood . Please consider confirmation of above message. Thank you . Sincerely, Judy Spaulding 5360 Falling tree Ln Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 2025-08-20—Regular Meeting—Public Hearing Item G2 : Correspondence Received 08/1 8/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Environmental Assessment and Design Camellia Court Tract 14644 Design Review DRC2024-00174 Dear Members of the City Council: I am a current resident at 9135 Camellia Court where I live with my family. My family has lived, worked and gone to school in the City of Rancho Cucamonga since 1989. We have seen Rancho Cucamonga grow and expand from a small town with a rich history to a diverse and thriving city with an exciting future. I recognize the proposed development at the terminus of Camellia Court as the natural result of that progress. I would however like to raise concerns regarding Stormwater Management. Residents in recent years have faced the threat of flood damage to their homes,particularly on the south side of the street perpendicular to Falling Tree Lane. Sand bags have been used on multiple occasions by myself and my neighbors to mitigate that threat. My concern is how an additional 4-5 acres of surface runoff would affect the homes at lower elevations. Furthermore, I would propose that excessive stormwater runoff would have an adverse impact as it pertains to the existing in-ground septic systems on Camellia Court, possibly impairing functionality or causing environmental hazards. We have attended community meetings regarding this proposed development but have not been provided any Stormwater Management Mapping nor seen the results of any Stormwater Drainage Surveys that may have been taken. Publicly available flood area maps show the proposed development adjacent to flood risk zones. It is my request of the Council to take into consideration these concerns and use any and all means to prevent any losses through property damage, value or otherwise that this proposed development may incur upon the current residents. I thank you for your time. Sincerely, J Greg Kornbacher 9135 Camellia Ct Alta Loma, CA 91737 City Council Alta Loma 8 Appeal August 20 , 2025 Project Overview Project: An appeal of a request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map (Tract 14644). Tentative Map: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 14644 on September 12, 1990, and the City Council approved the final map on June 3, 1992. Entitlement: Design Review DRC2024-00174 Zoning Designation: Very Low Residential (VL) General Plan Designation: Semi-Rural Neighborhood Project Background • Tract Map 14644 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990, and subsequently by the City Council on June 3, 1992; • May 22, 2024, the City received a Design Review application for the construction of 8 new houses on the approved lots; • On May 14, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider Design Review application DRC2024-00174, which proposes the construction of eight (8) new single-family residences on the previously approved lots; • On May 22, 2025, the City received a timely appeal of the Planning Commission approval. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4� TNIS MR, IS FOR IUE PURPOSE Ptn. Cucamonga Homestead Association, M.B. 6/46 City at Rancho Cucamonga 1061 - 38 OF AO 4FLOR[Y iA%AfION ONLY, Tax Rate Area 15003 �P G !r7 OMAP IDD Pv !9 199 n e I Q 4D S3 1 w YDD o �Q ao �N �� �• PI 2:5 Its 7R za,e {,63 e a �F �,p 103.13 re i a zla.e3 1�F. zss CO 561 T8 M1h h [o cr) x 1,0 9 H @ yt-IS 1 5 \ M1ti' 54-i3 JS'J a hry Q L9 � t_I� 94 CH J 2VS.SSi 1O0 33 149 27a.87 ° M1h \� 173-D9 SI.{I 73-SI 71.PP 74.Pi 6a !8 S8 I M RE NISEO 10/23/08 ON iorcl Ho. 14fi4q, Y.6. 249114-15 Ass ssor`s Map iracl No. 1381U, N.B. 227183-85 Ptn. Sec.22 Book 1061 Page 38 July 2004 Porcel Hop No. 4490. "W. 40136 T.1K-,R.7W. San Bernardino County Project Location JA v% • +� -t- mulis-07, I Project Site do 1 4 � R �f � � 'fig � Y 1*�11r t• ..�Y q `` 411 Pig.- i,S -- • '�`- Street View Z. dW jm ,'1.' r' � �r -7 �.y��t ��bG yp�•.s�, d4�-��� Y�� �S(}���� F Y".^y�. - - _\_.. _ • i. Project Site Looking East _ •- + r 16- CITY OF ♦ • CUCAMONGA --Ea�Es.w a ........ Overall Site/Landscape Plan I a , LOT 7 I ,'I LOT 5 LOT B J s F LOT 4 I � 21 � I ¢ 1 LOT 3 r LOT 2 LOT 1 r zx i E � ,II � V'/� One and Two-Story Front Elevations � l bm 71 ' Ole [. Appeal Issues Overview • Neighborhood Compatibility; • Street Access and Safety; • Infrastructure Capacity; • Environmental and Wildlife Concerns; • Construction Impacts; • Typographical Error. rM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 116" Neighborhood Compatibility Concerns Raised: • Size and design of the homes; • Two-story vs. one-story ratio; • Garage size and number of bedrooms. Staff response: • Project complies with all objective standards (height, setbacks, lot coverage); • 25% of homes are single-story (meets design section 17. 122.010); • The architectural design elements are applied consistently and reflect a unified design theme; • Building materials are compatible for construction in high fire hazard areas. Tract Map 14644 ..t `CENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14644 i' IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMUNOA, COUNTY OF !;AN 4�rRNARplgr + 5TA'rE OF CALIFORNIA +1 !i�' ocs raxlMa rycr r+ 5 7/DEWFLOPER j r larn•dn7r fYi.af[ sa¢ _ PZ ,�.5 ' � - _ RAx6Kl 6JCI lAXGh.C1 9,75d I 1 1 y - � r �y �_ 241l6x {wS a,�ellrKr f` F rm S MG r{ nr w 9rlara . '�;.^..• f 0 4 \ I 2"52 sY y a s 2 21.927 SF UTIUTIE5 df ; f 5 37./4Z SF 1 rj + sgz2o-sr Ifitr7aox[ o e `+h k �y L,�y� f i 3z,Mx}BF {tisGlwc.` so —YT!"F�f' wA-Y-G, r. - 5 B 2'.�495 aw.SEn NCu�wrw.90uXh . {;_ 7 20.815 5F ierxR Y+rEH WliYdi F, r 8 21195 5F � � �klrtl� frr k 47�a11 � F y � =f + fff f4fA1 181b5i SF _ {�1 AVE 22�707 sr^or ♦ 1 'i I'� fIY_•MSWa pyprprr �, L . ' A V;.w MCINITY Metlk }+ � 2 �+ N.r S. LEGAL ❑ESCRIP r*N � .g i':' ' � I rare..•w.d r.��Y r.,..xw.r... -- -- ------ --- -- - -- - - -------- � - -------- _-„_-- I44wxra^a[ar3o-aawaaW r°H`A� 'r' t !-`ram. •°'•�w _- �.A rr a a.6.1 - {eT�++la wlea f7rm�aaea ��WI �r�.r.�Y`�� rtrt •+,o-da'>f:xrcs +�Crr•re,..w r..Fcny rnr.. — CAMELLIA COUR f RANCHO GUWFA0IHGA, CAV., 5AN •�� T 1 f r / �j / j 3r AR C I l JJ T A'"F E� Tf?A FF Ko. 146 A{159T�� 1,STi4+1 F p TENTATIVE -IRAU MAP Development Code Compliance Table COMPLIANCE TABLE 14 Development Required Proposed Complies Standard 1 - 2 DU/AC 1 .67 DU/AC YES Front Setback .-A 42 Feet 37 — 45 Feet YES Plus or Minus 5 Feet Side Yard 10/15 Feet 10 Feet/Greater Than 15 YES Setback Feet • 60 Feet 60 Feet or Greater YES Building Height30 Feet Max Less Than 30 Feet YES Lot Coverage 25 Percent 20.9 to 24.4 Percent YES Street Access and Safety Concerns Raised : • Cul-de-sac length and limited emergency access; • Pedestrian safety with street extension; • Lack of sidewalks on the existing portion of Camellia Court. Staff Response: • Street design consistent with approved tract map; • Project will install sidewalks, curbs, and gutters within the project area. Infrastructure & Drainage Concerns Raised : • Stormwater runoff/flooding; • Water pressure and fire flow. Staff Response: • On-site drainage reviewed and preliminarly approved; • Street drainage will be directed to the existing flood control facility to the south; • Cucamonga Valley Water District has confirmed adequate water supply and fire pressure. Hydrology Map z au Pd a ik C31V TRAILAREA 450*30=1350 SF Concrete culvert 0.3 AC clItcri CL CIL This area will drain out to street in its natural flow which is minimal WGIVIP BmP Infiltration Trench r- .=0�1 CO�2, Q25=1.1 OFS 59 44 Foutiet connection to existing channel Flood Hazard Map TON RO7WS22 - F 1 C fiI dfl� (L i r a � y� .. _•� � rr y 1amp r AREA aF MINIMAL.F,�LDOD I-kAZARD ,,•�� ,.`� Znne)f r ti C1 +Of K nc -UC31110ngd rYr h f 06067.1 FIN w ' ` �1•+ _ YL1k1S4iS �r z if 0 :. s Environmental and Wildlife Concerns Raised: • Wildlife habitat disturbance; • Loss of informal equestrian access. Staff Response: • The City CEQA consultant has demonstrated the of the Class 32 exemption used; • Biological study completed for the project; mitigation includes pre-construction surveys for sensitive species; • Project will construct trail around project site connecting to existing trail network. Construction & Quality of Life Concerns Raised : • Construction noise and dust; • Disruption to daily life. Staff Response: • Project will comply with performance standards related to noise, dust, and construction hours. • Impacts are short-term and temporary. Typographical Error Concerns Raised: • Environmental review based on incorrect parcel number. Staff Response: • Public notice and environmental review used the correct location; • Site was correctly posted and reviewed; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4-- f7 ION 0nr Center Drive l Rancho Cucamonga,CA 917301909.4772700 —CilyoiRCus y-�� Jfy•7 , 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION Project WHEN!WHERE IS The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing Site�;„ , at 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,May 14,2025,at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, y V r�` THE MEETING? Council Chambers,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga, CA ff + 1 91730,to consider the following described project. y WHAT IS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 8, DESIGN REVIEW— STUDIO ROCA—A 1 request for site plan and design review of 8 single-family residences on 4.78 acres of PROPOSED? ter' land on a previously approved tract map(Tract 14644)at the terminus of Camellia iy� ■ 40'. !' Court in the Very Low Residential(VL)Zone and the Equestrian Overlay;APN:1076- 381-24 thru 31.The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA f - r h. •M Guidelines Section 15332—Infill Development Projects(Design Review DRC2024- ` , w$ x n" �p'- 00174). ii a, qP + e WHO TO CONTACT: Anyone having concerns or questions or wishing to review or comment on the project u ' .,d► �+ `� , �+ u should contact Tabe van der Zwaag,Associate Planner at(909)774A316 or via email at Tabe.vanderzwaaggcityofrc.us. ; �+ WHAT CAN I DO? All interested parties are invited to express opinions for or against the proposal and submit their concerns via email to Tabe.vanderzwaag@cityofre.us prior to said meeting. All comments received will be presented to the Planning Commission and * 41' �► P included in the record. ..0 The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless the project is appealed within '" !' •''�' *' 10 days. Appeals must be filed in writing to the City Clerk,state the reason for the r ,}- �"'�'• fir r 1� appeal,and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. If you challenge the foregoing action in court,you maybe limited to raising only those { IS + r. issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing for final action described in r, this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at,or ^ ' prior to,the public hearing. 1dffn.nn_r ft F .rrCnJLt r" rvyf LAIL:MIT.. .. ,_.. DATE NOTICE April 29,2025 MAILED: Challenge Letter (GNPs) • Received letter dated June 14, 2025, from the California Native Plant Society Concerns Raised: • Claims project site includes remnant coastal sage scrub & possible coastal whiptail lizard habitat. Staff Response: • City's CEQA Consultant Letter (8/5/25) — Confirms Class 32 criteria met; • Site primarily disturbed; no suitable rare/threatened/endangered species habitat; • No substantial evidence of significant impacts or cumulative effects. Correspondence: • This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on August 6th; • Notices were mailed to 90 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on August 5tn; • The property was posted on August 6t" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAf r fir': 1O500 Civic Cam Drive lRanchoCucomongo,CA9173p19p9477.21pplwww.CityolRC.us ,..■ � F y' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL 04 ?"# Project Site The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 1 WHEN(WHERE 15 p.m. on Wednesday, August 20, 2025, at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, f THE MEETING? Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamon a,CA ' 91730,to consider the following described project. g � +,�■�, M ' 1 � WHAT IS APPEAL OF AN APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BDESIGN + " PROPOSED? REVIEW—STUDIO ROCA—A request for site plan and design review of 8 single- PPP family residences on 4.78 acres of land on a previously approved tract map(Tract 14644)at the terminus of Camellia Court in the Very Low Residential(VL)Zone and °h' 4; %n■:�r the Equestrian Overlay;APN: 1076-381-24 thru 31.The project qualifies as a Class ' ► `' "� 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332—Infill Development A Ir ■ Projects (Design Review DRC2024-00174). This item was heard by the Planning Commission on May 14,2025. .+�►► ,• r �+ u CA WHO TO CONTACT: Anyone having concerns or questions or wishing to review or comment on the project .f, � �r •� �,� should contact Tape van der Zwaag,Associate Planner at(909)774-4316 or via email a �" atTa_be.vanderzwaagWT ". WHAT CAN I DO7 Anyone objecting to or in favor of the above may submit their concerns in writing to •+ __. �** the City prior to said meeting, Written comments may be provided by mail and ,} �'�'• I { -` ' ;_ addressed to the Planning Department,City of Rancho Cucamonga,P.O.Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729,or by email to Tabe.vanderzwaa cit o(rc.us. 'A'4� The decision of the City Council is final.If you challenge any of the foregoing actions .: • t in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised • J'1 ..t + .t, at the public hearing for final action described it this notice, or in written "e"ru°"-r%ft F ter`r" correspondence delivered to the City Council at,or prior to,the public hearing. DATE NOTICE August 5,2025 MAILED: n N Did 11 i 1 ((�- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGn r F • 1 . • Staff Recommendation • Staff recommends that the City Council deny Appeal DRC2025-00130 and uphold the Planning Commission's May 8, 2025, approval of Design Review DRC2024- 00174, for the construction of eight (8) single-family residences on previously approved Tract Map (14644). A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 1045, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 16.36.09 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and Adding Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Concerning Undergrounding Overhead Utilities and a Resolution Identifying the Locations Where Utility Undergrounding Is Mandatory and the Regions Where In-Lieu Undergrounding Fees May Be Spent. This Item is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). (ORDINANCE NO. 1045; RESOLUTION NO. 2025-067) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the Council: 1. Introduce Ordinance No. 1045 entitled "An Ordinance of The City Council of The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Amending Chapter 16.36.09 of The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and Adding Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Concerning Undergrounding Overhead Utilities, and Making A Determination of Exemption from CEQA", waive full reading and read by title only; and 2. Adopt the attached resolution identifying Undergrounding Regions and Focus Areas Ineligible for Exemption under Ordinance No. 1045. BACKGROUND: On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 87-96, establishing a revised policy for the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities and repealing Resolution 86-77, which was adopted on May 28, 1986. At the time of adoption of these resolutions, the Planning Commission wished to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment. Resolution 87-96 was necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. The resolution established that all developments, except those listed in the resolution and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be Page 606 responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines, including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development. Resolution 87-96 required developers to underground utility lines along their project frontage at their own expense. In certain circumstances, developers are required to pay an in-lieu fee. The resolution also stipulates that developers are eligible for reimbursement of half the undergrounding costs from future developments on the opposite side of the street. Additionally, Resolution 87-96 addresses the handling of utility lines on the opposite side of the proposed development, particularly when utility lines are present on both sides of the street. It further specifies requirements for poles containing 66KV or larger electrical lines, defines the limits of responsibility, and details the in-lieu fee amount and applicable exemptions. Furthermore, Chapter 16.36.09 of the municipal code requires undergrounding for all subdivisions and allows the City Council to accept an in-lieu fee of the undergrounding of existing facilities along peripheral streets. However, the current code does not permit the acceptance of in-lieu fees for new residential subdivisions, which limits the flexibility and financial options available for these projects. The proposed amendment will allow in-lieu fees for all project types as determined by the City Engineer. Since the adoption of Resolution 87-96, staff has successfully conditioned projects to either underground utility lines or pay an in-lieu fee. This initiative has led to the undergrounding of many areas, significantly improving the aesthetic by removing unsightly overhead utilities. On July 23, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment to the Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities Code. A copy of the staff report outlining the proposed amendment in more detail is on file with the City Clerk's office. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes is also on file with the City Clerk's office. There were no comments from the public at the hearing. However, the day of the public hearing the City received a letter from Esoteric Homes in support of the code amendment. The Planning Commission unanimously repealed Resolution No. 87-96 and recommended approval of the amendment to the City Council. ANALYSIS: As part of this code update, staff analyzed the current resolution and municipal code requirements for undergrounding of overhead utilities and determined updates were required to further clarify and update to meet the City's vision, goals and policies. This update will clarify the requirements for undergrounding of overhead utilities and continue to improve the area by removing unsightly overhead utilities while recognizing and respecting the character of established neighborhoods and the minimizing impacts that such requirements may have on in-fill development costs and timelines. Proposed Code Update Summary The proposed code update specifies the timeline for completing required undergrounding. Undergrounding must be completed before the acceptance of related street improvements or, if no street improvements are required, before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The proposed update shifts the authority to determine the impracticality of undergrounding from the Planning Commission to the City Engineer. This change is important for several reasons: Page 2 Page 607 • Streamlined Decision Making: By aligning the decision-making authority with the City Engineer, the process becomes more efficient. The City Engineer is directly involved in the entitlement process and the issuance of conditions of approval, which means decisions regarding the impracticality of undergrounding can be made more swiftly and in conjunction with other project considerations. • Consistency and Coordination: Centralizing this authority with the City Engineer promotes consistency in decision-making. It ensures that all determinations regarding undergrounding impracticality are made using the same criteria and standards, reducing the potential for discrepancies and ensuring a uniform approach across different projects. • Enhanced Project Management: Integrating this decision within the technical review of the entitlement process allows for better coordination and management of projects. The City Engineer can assess the impracticality of undergrounding in the context of the overall project plan, leading to well-integrated infrastructure solutions. • Improved Responsiveness: The City Engineer's involvement from the beginning of the project allows for more responsive and adaptive decision-making. As conditions and project requirements evolve, the City Engineer can quickly reassess and adjust determinations regarding undergrounding, ensuring that the city's infrastructure goals are met without unnecessary delays. In-Lieu Fee Calculations: The update clarifies the calculation of in-lieu fees, requiring a qualified engineer registered in California to prepare the cost estimate. Once approved by the City Engineer, this estimate will determine the in-lieu fee required from the developer. In-Lieu Fee Expenditure: The update now includes a section for where the in-lieu fees shall be spent. The proposed regions are specified in the attached resolution (Attachment 1). Once the City has collected sufficient funds from in-lieu fees within a region, the City may underground a section of utility lines within that region. Staff will coordinate with the Finance Department to evaluate the allocation of previously collected in-lieu fees, ensuring that the use of these funds aligns with fiscal responsibility and established City priorities. Exemptions and Focus Areas: The Exemptions section has been updated to exclude exemption from undergrounding requirements any project in a specific plan or master plan adopted by the City Council and Focus Areas as defined in the General Plan and identified in a resolution adopted by the City Council. Given the nature of change envisioned for these focus areas, staff recommends that developments within the areas be required to undergo undergrounding to ensure maintaining of the community's vision for these areas. The Focus Areas include: • Focus Area 1: Downtown Rancho Cucamonga (Victoria Gardens & Epicenter) • Focus Area 2: Civic Center • Focus Area 3: HART District • Focus Area 8: Southeast Industrial Area Page 3 Page 608 Additionally, the exemption for undergrounding for residential subdivisions has been expanded from four to ten single-family residential parcels, provided utility lines extend at least 600 feet offsite from both project boundaries. This change aims to make development more feasible for these smaller projects. Appeal Process: A new section has been introduced to establish a clear procedure for applicants to appeal the undergrounding requirements or the calculation of the in-lieu fee. Under this process, applicants may submit a written appeal detailing the grounds for their request, specifically citing why utility undergrounding is deemed unreasonable or impractical, or why the in-lieu fee was calculated in error. To initiate an appeal, the applicant must file a notice of appeal with the City Clerk within 20 calendar days from the date on which the City Engineer's decision was rendered and fee was paid. The City Council shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal. The City Council shall have all authority to determine all questions raised on such appeal and City Council determinations are final. In order to allow development projects already deemed complete or that have received entitlements that are subject to the current undergrounding requirements, the Ordinance also provides an opportunity for developers to request review of their project by the City Engineer and City Planner under the updated parameters of Ordinance No. 1045. Following review, the City Engineer and City Planner will issue a determination letter detailing changes approved for existing undergounding conditions to align them with the new requirements (e.g., exemption or eligibility for in-lieu payment). Environmental Analysis Staff has determined that the proposed code amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15378(a), the proposed Amendments are not considered a "Project" under CEQA because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This is due to the fact that the amendments do not change any practice or procedure, but rather clarify and codify existing practice. Furthermore, the proposed Amendments are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment because most new development in the City is required to underground utilities along their frontage and this does not change that requirement. Furthermore, the Amendments are categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c)which exempts from review the replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving a negligible or no expansion of capacity. For existing utility systems that are required to be placed underground, there will be a negligible or no expansion of capacity. Additionally, the Amendments are categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(d)which exempts from review the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity replaced including conversion of overhead electric utility distribution facilities to underground including connection to existing overhead Page 4 Page 609 electric utility distribution lines where the surface is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding. For any new development where the undergrounding of utilities is required, the adoption of this Amendments are categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(d) which exempts from review the construction of and location of new small facilities and structures including water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-067 Attachment 2 - Undergrounding Ordinance No. 1045 Page 5 Page 610 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE LOCATIONS WHERE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IS MANDATORY AND THE REGIONS WHERE IN-LIEU UNDERGROUNDING FEES MAY BE SPENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 17.84 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1045 added Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code in order to establish requirements for undergrounding overhead utility lines for new development and redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, Section 17.84.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code authorizes developers to pay a fee in lieu of undergrounding overhead utility lines where the City Engineer determines, based on certain findings, that utility undergrounding is impractical; and WHEREAS, Section 17.84.060.B. states that an exemption from the undergrounding requirement may not be approved, and an in-lieu fee is not permitted, in General Plan Focus Areas shown in a resolution approved by the City Council and any specific plan or master plan adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Section 17.84.070 states that any in-lieu fees collected for utility undergrounding must be spent in the region in which the development from which the funds were collected is located, as identified in a map approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 1.84.060.13. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby adopts the map set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto showing the General Plan Focus Areas where an exemption from the utility undergrounding requirement is not applicable. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 1.84.070 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby adopts the map set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto showing the regions in which in-lieu fees may be spent based upon the location of the development that genereted such funds. Section 3. The City Council finds that the establishment of the maps set forth herein is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it can be seen with certainty that such maps would not have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Res. Code Sec. 15061(b)(3)). This is because the maps merely clarify the areas already outlined by the City Council in Ordinance No. 1045 and are not intended to expand or authorize any new development. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Resolution would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitution Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2025-067 - Page 1 of 3 Page 611 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2025. Resolution No. 2025-067 - Page 2 of 3 Page 612 EXHIBIT A Map of Mandatory Utility Undergrounding Areas And Map of Regions Where In-Lieu Fees May Be Spent Resolution No. 2025-067 - Page 3 of 3 Page 613 ■ liq - 1 ❑ny CrvrA 0�eac,ear REGION 2 i REGION 1 1 I j - Al:a_o1.1 .list i,.,. �,i ...i�...e 1—•--- I G , ■ 210 210 _ / 210 J 210 \ -lr: 210 / / 1 ® Mir',:... + REGION 4 ' upland Hills I j Cvumry Club I REGION 3 - E kith St Y p FOCUS AREA 1 ! a r ® ee Rancho Cucamonga o l E 11th 5t FOCUS AREA Z 4 E Arraw Hwy ' REGION 675 E 9th St n c REGION 5 Whlttram Ave i•v e E oth St ollve st FOCUS AREA 3 FOCUS AREA 8 I E 7th Et 10 Y ' F fi[h$[ I E Princeton St z I i2 e - z E4[ 5t ^}•---•—._. .—.— — — ri- — — — — — — — — — — — —.—.—._._._ 5an Bernard-Ave 3 ° 3 Page%W' ATTACHMENT 2 ORDINANCE NO. 1045 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 16.36.09 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER 17.84 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITIES, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION FROM CEQA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Chapter 17.84. Chapter 17.84 ("Underground Utilities") of Article IV ("Site Development Provisions") of Title 17 ("Development Code")of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby added to read in full as follows: "17.84 Underground Utilities. 17.84.010. Undergrounding Utilities. Except as provided in Section 17.84.060 or where payment of an in-lieu fee is authorized, all new and existing overhead utility lines shall be installed underground in conjunction with any development, including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of the development as provided in this Chapter, at the applicant's expense. A. Arrangements, including the payment of all costs for undergrounding, shall be made by the applicant with the serving utilities. B. Undergrounding shall be completed: 1. Prior to the acceptance of related street improvements; or 2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy if no related street improvements are required. 17.84.020. In-Lieu Fee. In those circumstances where the City Engineer decides that undergrounding is impractical, the applicant may satisfy the undergrounding requirement by paying an in-lieu fee in accordance with the formula set forth in Section 17.84.050. The in-lieu fee shall be paid to the city prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The City Engineer may determine undergrounding is impractical if any of the following conditions exist: A. The length of the lines to be places underground will be less than three hundred (300) feet and the utility lines have not been placed underground on any property abutting the subject property; Page 1 of 5 Page 615 B. Severe disruption to existing off-site improvements or heavy congestion of utility lines would make impractical service to properties under separate ownership; or C. Any other condition that City Engineer finds exists and will make undergrounding impractical. 17.84.030. Poles Containing 66KV or Larger Electrical Lines. 66KV or larger electrical lines shall not be undergrounded unless the City Engineer and applicant agree to do so. 17.84.040. Limits of Responsibility. Undergrounding shall include the development's entire frontage and extend to: (i) the first existing pole off-site from the development's boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (ii) a new pole erected at a development's boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (iii) an existing pole within five feet of a development's boundary, except a corner. 17.84.050. Fee Amount. The in-lieu fee amount shall be equal to the amount identified in a detailed project specific construction cost estimate approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a qualified engineer registered in the State of California. The cost for preparation of the required construction cost estimate shall be borne by the applicant. 17.84.060. Exemptions. A. The following developments shall be exempt from undergrounding utility lines as required by this Chapter: 1. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosures of outdoor storage area, parking and loading area, block walls and fences, etc. 2. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. 3. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. 4. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPs. 5. Projects consisting of the construction of one (1) single family residence on an existing parcel. Page 2 of 6 Page 616 6. Existing overhead utility lines located in public and private rights- of way, including but not limited to streets, trails, alleys, and utility easements where heavy congestion of utility lines would make impractical service to properties under separate ownership. 7. Residential subdivisions of ten or fewer single family residential parcels, where utility lines extend at least 600 feet offsite from both project boundaries. 8. Where otherwise preempted by state law. B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is no exemption to the requirement to underground overhead utilities under this Chapter for projects within the boundaries of: 1. (i) General Plan Focus Area 1: Downtown Rancho Cucamonga (Victoria Gardens & Epicenter); (ii) General Plan Focus Area 2: Civic Center; (iii) General Plan Focus Area 3: HART District; and (iv) General Plan Focus Area 8: Southeast Industrial Area, as all such focus areas are defined by the general plan and shown in a resolution approved by the City Council. 2. Any specific plan or master plan adopted by the City Council. 17.84.070. In-Lieu Fee Expenditure. A. Funds collected from in-lieu fees shall be spent in the region in which the development from which the funds were collected is located. For purposes of this Chapter, the regions shall be identified in a map that is approved by the Council in a resolution and the official copy shall be on file in the Engineering Division. B. Once the City has collected sufficient funds from in-lieu fees within a region to underground a section of utility lines, the City may underground a section of utility lines within that region. 17.84.080. Appeals. A. An applicant adversely affected by the City Engineer's determination that undergrounding is or is not impractical pursuant to Section 17.84.020 or contesting the amount of the in-lieu fee may appeal such determinations to the City Council. B. All appeals shall be in writing and shall state the reason why utility undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical or the in-lieu fee was unreasonable or erroneously calculated. Appeals in instances finding undergrounding is not impractical shall include a preliminary estimate of cost, in writing, from the serving utilities. Page 3 of 6 Page 617 C. An applicant may initiate an appeal by filing a notice of appeal with the City Clerk within 20 days after the date on which the City Engineer takes the action appealed from and paying the applicable fee, which shall be set by resolution. D. The City Council shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal. The City Clerk shall give notice to the appellant of the time and place of hearing by serving the notice personally or by depositing it in the United States Post Office in the city, postage prepaid, addressed to such persons at their last known addresses. E. The City Council shall have the authority to determine all questions raised on such appeal. F. City Council determinations are final." Section 2. Amendment of Chapter 16.39.090. Chapter 16.36.090 ("Required Improvements; Utilities") of Title 16 ("Subdivisions") of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as set forth below. "16.36.090 Required improvements; utilities. All new and existing overhead utility lines are subject to and shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 17.84 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code." Section 3. The development code amendment set forth in Section 1 above generally requiring the undergrounding of new utility facilities in new development, with certain exceptions, is consistent with the general plan, including for example, Goal S-5.6 which provides: "Underground Utilities. Promote under-grounding of utilities for new development, major remodels, and redevelopment." Section 4. Repeal of Planning Commission Resolution 87-96. Upon the date that this Ordinance takes effect, Planning Commission Resolution 87-96 and related policies of the City's Engineering Division with conflicting processes for undergrounding utility lines in developments are hereby repealed. Section 5. Projects deemed complete or entitled as of the effective date of this Ordinance that have not implemented their undergrounding requirements specified in applicable entitlement conditions of approval may request review of such conditions by the Engineering Director and Planning Director for a determination of whether any changes in applicable Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code or other applicable regulations pertaining to utility undergrounding would either (i) eliminate the undergrounding requirements or (ii) allow for compliance with undergrounding requirements through payment of an in-lieu fee. Notwithstanding Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.14.100, the Directors are jointly authorized to amend or waive Page 4 of 6 Page 618 the applicable condition of approval if they find that either condition (i) or (ii) described above applies. Section 6. CEQA. The City Council finds that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15378(a), the proposed Ordinance is not considered a "Project" under CEQA because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This is due to the fact that the Ordinance does not change any practice or procedure, but rather clarifies and codifies existing practice. Furthermore, the proposed action is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment because most new development in the City is required to underground utilities along their frontage and this does not change that requirement. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c) which exempts from review the replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving a negligible or no expansion of capacity. For existing utility systems that are required to be placed underground, there will be a negligible or no expansion of capacity. The City Council further finds that the adoption of the Ordinance is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(d) which exempts from review the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity replaced including conversion of overhead electric utility distribution facilities to underground including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines where the surface is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding. For any new development where the undergrounding of utilities is required, the City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(d) which exempts from review the construction of and location of new small facilities and structures including water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction. Section 7. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Page 5 of 6 Page 619 Section 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Sevy, City Clerk I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the , 2025, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Page 6 of 6 Page 620 RANCHO f�f CUCAMONGA CODE AM EN DM ENT ,, Underground of Overhead Uti l ities RANCHO Ke Actions �' f CUCAMONGA • Ordinance Amending Section 16-36- 09 of the Municipal Code . • Adding new Chapter 17. 84to the Municipal Code . • Adopt Resolution No. 2S- 067 RANCHO Current Code Back round f CUCAMONGA g • June 10 , 19877 PC adopted Resolution 87 -96 to repeal Resolution 86-77 . • Developers are required to underground or pay in - lieu fees. • Outlines limits of undergrounding responsibility. R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA 121 qm �f 1 rr++rr Nli �r ry 1 III , Aft fa kMw { sr� rr '• v 'W'� 1 k '' '4t' RANCHO Code Amendment Hi ghlights CUCAMONGA I • City Engineer will now determine undergrounding impracticality and Expanded exemptions (4 to 10 SFP lots) . • Clarifies how the in - lieu fee is calculated . • New outlined appeal process to establish a clear procedure . • Defined regions for fee collection & expenditure . r Dee.crr► REGION 2 FP, ,VI0N 1 ,{ 3 • l aV alnllk�'� RE,V I,L,N 4 UM Md Eill} ••, {��j rwr!r{L RE I-DN I 7411h 3.1 c } 3 I G FOCUSAREA 1 I j4n- I _ c 29 ' E I75h St FOCUSAREA 2 '. I RECION C- , i 7h Sr REGION FOCUSAREA 3 FOCUSAREA B r -h f l �dly 51 I t t I E rsinrr,4n%c K z RANCHO Recommendation f CUCAMONGA Staff Recommends : • Adopting Ordinance Amending Section 16.36. 09 of the Municipal Code. • Adding new Chapter 17.84to the Municipal Code . • Adopt Resolution No. 2S - 067 Cr��� RANCHO CUCAMONGA Questions 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA k L-1 R DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager- Community Development Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director Zack Neighbors, Building & Safety Services Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Development Update - Second Quarter 2025. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation from staff on development-related activities for the second quarter of 2025 (April through June). BACKGROUND: In 2023 staff began providing Quarterly Development Updates (QDU) to the City Council. The purpose of these reports is to regularly inform the Council and the community about development- related activities. While annual reports such as the General Plan progress report, offer some insights into development activities (including the number of permits issued and housing units constructed), quarterly updates effectively deliver information on development activities over a shorter time frame. These updates also allow staff to include additional information, such as economic development activities and customer service data, which are not typically covered in annual reports but are essential to the City's community development efforts. ANALYSIS: The QDU presented to the City Council will include summaries of activities from the Building & Safety, Planning, and Economic Development departments. This includes, but is not limited to, details on entitlement approvals by use type, updates on key development projects, and reporting on building permit and plan check activities. Staff's formal presentation to the City Council will provide further details on development-related activities, and staff will continue to present this information to Council on a quarterly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council's following core values: 1. Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all 2. Relentless pursuit of improvement 3. Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 621 A 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the Maintenance Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District(I ERCD). Approve the Conservation Easement of 120 Acres Near Cucamonga Canyon [APNs: Portion of 0200-051-48 and 0200-051-49], Authorize the City Manager to Take all Actions Necessary and to Execute All Documents Necessary to Effect the Conservation Easement, and Find the Conservation Easement Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and Consistent with the General Plan. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council Approve the Maintenance Agreement (Memorandum of Agreement) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD); Approve the Conservation Easement for approximately 120 acres located near Cucamonga Canyon [Assessor Parcel Numbers: Portion of 0200-051-48 and 0200- 051-49]; Authorize the City Manager to take all necessary actions and execute all documents required to effectuate the Conservation Easement; and Determine the Conservation Easement exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and consistent with the General Plan. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, in partnership with the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD), seeks to preserve approximately 120 acres of natural open space near Cucamonga Canyon. This property, known as King Ranch, identified in part by APNs 0200-051- 48 and 0200-051-49, represents a valuable ecological and recreational resource for the community and region. The City and IERCD have developed a Memorandum of Agreement (MCA)that outlines the roles and responsibilities of each party. The City will retain ownership of the property and grant a 47- acre conservation easement to IERCD. IERCD will provide ongoing habitat stewardship in the easement area and ensure permanent conservation per the MCA. Aside from the 47-acres placed into the conservation easement to IERCD, the rest of the property will be placed into conservation by the City, protecting natural resources, including the ecosystems, species, and habitats from harm, depletion, and development. Page 622 ANALYSIS: The attached easement map outlines boundaries of the King Property and highlights its key components. On the southern portion of the site, adjacent to residential neighborhoods, a proposed vineyard is planned. The City is exploring a partnership with a third-party agricultural operator to lease, plant, and maintain grapevines in this area. In addition to serving as an agricultural activation and educational site for wine production, the vineyard will provide a visual, spatial, and sound buffer for nearby residents, helping to mitigate potential impacts. The site plan also depicts fire resiliency improvements designed in coordination with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District to address regional wildfire threats. Located within the non-easement portion of the property, these improvements will include: • A helipad: a designated landing and takeoff area for rotary-wing aircraft, constructed and maintained to support safe and efficient helicopter operations. Helipads may be permanent or temporary and are utilized for emergency response, medical evacuation, firefighting, law enforcement, and other authorized aviation activities. The helipad shall conform to applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing aviation safety, land use, and emergency access. • A helicopter dip tank: a self-contained water dispensing unit specifically designed to support rotary-wing aircraft engaged in aerial firefighting operations. The dip tank serves as a tactical water source for helicopters equipped with snorkel or dip-tube systems, enabling rapid refilling in permanent or temporary locations. • A 50-foot operational buffer surrounding all fire-related infrastructure to ensure safe and efficient access for emergency vehicles and first responders Additionally, the map features a network of multi-use trails that will expand recreational opportunities for the community. These trails — open to hiking, biking, and equestrian use — will strengthen the City's overall trail system and improve public access to nature. Each trail includes a 2-foot buffer on either side to allow for brush clearance and optional fencing. The trails are intentionally excluded from the conservation easement to allow for ongoing maintenance and community use while safeguarding the conservation area's ecological integrity. Finally, because no physical changes to the land are anticipated beyond minor maintenance of the existing trail connection to the federal access road, the acquisition of this property is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15325, which applies to the acquisition, sale, or transfer of land to preserve existing natural conditions or open space — consistent with the goals of the City's General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: No City funds will be used to purchase this property. The acquisition is fully funded through grants, with IERCD contributing $1 million to secure the 47-acre conservation easement. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION /VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Land acquisition and conservation of the 122 acres of King Ranch will help promote a healthy community for all, preserve a family-oriented atmosphere, and provide a high quality of life for all in Rancho Cucamonga. Page 2 Page 623 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — MOA between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and IERCD Attachment 2 — Easement Map Attachment 3 — Fire Resiliency Appendix Page 3 Page 624 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation, having offices at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92730 ("City"), and the INLAND EMPIRE RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT, a governmental special district having offices at 25864-K Business Center Drive, Redlands, California 92374 ("IERCD") (together,the"Parties"). City and IERCD are sometimes individually referred to as"Party" and collectively as "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Residential Developer Richland Communities, Inc. had an interest in that certain residential project commonly known as Tract 16072 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, (the "Project") which residential project the City approved in 2006; WHEREAS, the City's Condition of Approval B-1 for Tract 16072 ("Condition B- 1" [See Exhibit"A"])provides in pertinent part that the project proponent/property owner of Tract 16072 shall cause to be transferred to a qualified conservation entity approved by the City 147.7 acres of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat preservation prior to the recording of the first final map for the Project; WHEREAS, Condition B-1 also provides that in connection with the conservation entity receiving such fee title the conservation entity shall also be provided with funding to provide for the long-term maintenance of those 147.7 acres,in an amount to be"mutually agreed upon"by the project proponent/property owner and the conservation entity; WHEREAS, Condition B-1 also provides that if the project proponent/property owner is unable to acquire all or a portion of the 147.7 acres, it shall deposit the equivalent mitigation cost of$10,000.00 per developable acre with a City-approved agency, which funding shall be used to purchase and manage open space conservation habitat lands; WHEREAS, IERCD is a Resource Conservation District formed pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 9151 et seq., and IERCD may accept grants of money or real property to carry out its purposes, and may establish and charge fees for services provided upon request pursuant to California Public Resources Code sections 9401 et seq.; WHEREAS, IERCD may enter into contracts to accept grants of money pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 9402 and 9404; WHEREAS, IERCD may perform habitat restoration, habitat conservation and/or similar activities for development project proponents required to provide mitigation as part of government agency or local government approvals; 1 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 625 WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that IERCD is a conservation entity which has been confirmed as being qualified and approved by the City to accept the monetary funds described in the second paragraph of Condition B-1; WHEREAS, to satisfy Condition B-1, Richland made payment of $10,000 per developable acre to IERCD to purchase and manage mitigation lands; WHEREAS, the City and IERCD would like to work together to purchase and conserve the property known as the King Ranch consisting of 122.06 acres, a portion of Assessor Parcel Numbers 0200-051-48-0000 & 0200-051-49-0000 ("King Ranch Property"), depicted in Exhibit`B." WHEREAS, the City plans to grant a conservation easement to IERCD ("Conservation Easement")in order to fulfill the requirements of Condition B-1 to preserve the King Ranch Property in perpetuity. WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which the City will purchase King Ranch and grant a conservation easement to IERCD in order to conserve the King Ranch property. NOW, THEREFORE, City and IERCD do hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein and made an operative part of this Agreement. 2. City grees To: 2.1 Purchase the King Ranch Property and own it in fee title. 2.2 Grant a Conservation Easement to IERCD in the form attached hereto as Exhibit`B." The Conservation Easement will consist of at least 47 acres located on the map show in Exhibit"C"within the King Ranch Property. The Conservation Easement will be granted through an escrow,which escrow instructions are attached here to as Exhibit"D." 2.3 Deposit the balance of the purchase price needed to purchase the King Ranch Property(i.e., the balance of the purchase price would be the amount of the purchase price less the amount deposited by IERCD as described in section 3.1, below). 3. IERCD Agrees To: 3.1 Deposit $1,000,000 into escrow to purchase the 47-acre Conservation Easement from the City in order to keep parts of the King Ranch Property in conservation in perpetuity in fulfillment of Condition B-1. Such escrow instructions are attached hereto as Exhibit"D." 2 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 626 3.2 Accept the Conservation Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit «B 4. Mitigation. The City agrees that purchasing the King Ranch Property will satisfy Richland Communities' requirement to expend the Payment "to purchase and manage mitigation lands"pursuant to Condition B-1 as set forth in Exhibit A of this Agreement. 5. Term. This Agreement shall be considered to be fulfilled and completed by the close of escrow and the recording of the conservation easement granted to IERCD. 6. Notices. As used in this Agreement, notice includes but is not limited to the communication of any notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, and appointment. All notices must be in writing. All such notices from one party to another may be delivered in person, sent via reputable overnight courier, or served by first-class mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, to each and all of the addresses set forth below. To IERCD at: To City at: Mandy Parkes, District Manager John R. Gillison, City Manager Inland Empire Resource City of Rancho Cucamonga Conservation District(IERCD) 10500 Civic Center Drive 25864-K Business Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92730 Redlands, CA 92374 Any party may change the address to which such notices or other communications may be sent by giving the other Parties written notice of such change. 7. Authority to Enter Agreement. Each Parry to this Agreement warrants to the other that it is duly organized and existing and that it and the respective signatories have full right and authority to enter into and consummate this Agreement and all related documents and bind the parties thereto. 8. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Parties. This Agreement is intended by the Parties as a full and final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters contained in this Agreement and shall not be modified in any manner except by an instrument in writing executed by the Parties or their respective successors in interest. 9. Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 10. Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in San Bernardino County. 11. Attorneys' Fees. The Parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs. 3 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 627 4. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the Parties. 5. No Waiver. Failure of either Party to insist upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 6. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 7. Severability. It is intended that each paragraph of this Agreement shall be treated as separate and divisible, and in the event that any paragraphs are deemed unenforceable, the remainder shall continue to be in full force and effect so long as the primary purpose of this Agreement is unaffected. 8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. (Signatures on Next Page) 4 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 628 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR THE FUNDING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE INLAND EMPIRE RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date as indicated beside each Parry's signature. Date John R. Gillison, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Date Rick Gomez President of the Board of Directors Inland Empire Resource Conservation District 5 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 629 EXHIBIT "A" City of Rancho Cucamonga Condition of Approval B-1 TRACT NO. 16072 Biological Resources B-1: Prior to recording of the first final map of the project, the property owner shall transfer to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS-1 or other qualified conservation entity approved by the City, in fee, at a ratio of 1:1 (or 147.7 acres) of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat preservation; along with funding in an amount to be mutually agreed upon by the property owner and the conservation entity, to provide for long-term maintenance of said land. The preferred location of the off-site land is in the environment surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the City Sphere of Influence, other properties may be considered based [on] the review of appropriate Biological Habitat Assessments and concurrence of the City Planner. If the proponent is unable to acquire all or a portion of the offsite mitigation land, the proponent will deposit the equivalent mitigation cost of$10,000 per developable acre with City-approved agency, which acquires and maintains open space. These funds will be used to purchase and manage mitigation lands. 6 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 630 Exhibit `B" Form of Conservation Easement [see attached] 7 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 631 September 27,2024 Appraisal Review Attachment,Page 3 122.09 Acre Portion of King Property(Parcel 2) EXHIBIT "B" PARCEL 2 "EST LNV£or TN£SOVTM Q�.0 IiAlf SECPON 16 Nco�B'TaY ?6aa2a' w 9rc r R e 4 IX Vi PARCEL 2 h 12209 AC 14 Iti sooe'ra�r asu.ea Xn P,+�J g - ?so'w PARCEL s 4 170.Tr ,4C L�iJ Kan &A 1 eb y ry icy $ I an Lor tom£ NEBtjPAR. J y a 4YaR. £iLSl 11W OF THE SOWN £ t/a COW' SEC M aW HALF fX SCCI)W W 5£C r6 Of CiL7 ' SCalf 1'.800' /LLLEN W. kVJMN PL5 5306 DATE SHEET I OF T 8 27761.00045\42815050.2 Page 632 �rmin,USGS,Int—lap.INCREMENT�NRCan,E Esri' •g) l Korea,Esri(Thailand),NGCC,(c) - - jr1jb�u;bjjj ity ♦♦eQW,♦♦♦ e<IFAWE A♦♦A♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦°♦°♦°♦°e°♦°♦°♦!♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦�<A♦C♦e!♦9 ♦♦♦°♦♦ ��R `Y��► �`G�7 ti��4�li��w- >��AOi►q�l�►♦♦♦♦♦'ASS��,♦t♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦♦♦e♦1A< r o♦0000e@o♦♦♦♦♦oo♦♦♦ eo♦♦♦♦o♦o♦♦ -��♦♦♦♦ �-s�� •o�oa a♦d'�.00�.°.`w♦w♦♦♦ . ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦>♦♦♦A♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦`�♦e♦�A,��Adee♦♦♦♦e♦♦eSP Q 1♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦> � @ ' ,poeP♦�rPl,>eew<♦,�e1.'-mot°A ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦O< ♦!sue♦♦♦♦E♦ ♦♦♦ . !+>♦♦e0w� .. - ♦o♦oe♦♦♦ee>♦o♦♦♦o♦♦ •e ♦o♦•� oee o♦s< e ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦oo♦oo♦o♦♦e Asp ��i°i°i°i°i°♦°e°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i ♦° o°♦°e°♦°e°♦As°♦°6i°i .- . �,°i°i°i°i°i°e°i°i°i°e°♦°i°i°i°!°i°i°i° ° ♦'i°s�i°♦°i°i°i°o°♦°i°i°i°♦°' ♦°i°o°i°i - N♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦o♦♦♦o♦♦♦o♦♦♦o♦♦♦o♦♦♦o♦,♦o♦♦ ♦• ♦♦♦♦°eoo,♦♦o♦♦♦♦o♦o♦♦♦♦♦oo<o A♦°se♦♦e♦o♦ » �� - �,,;. v°e°♦°♦°e°♦°e°♦°e°Os°♦°e°o0°S° o°e°♦°i♦°e°♦°ewo°e°i°♦°e°♦°e°♦°e°♦°i s°♦°e�♦°♦°o°♦°♦°♦°i''�: ',' �' >♦♦♦@e♦♦O♦♦♦♦♦a ♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦AA♦♦♦♦t�^ r-tom<:F. ��►°♦°♦c♦°♦°♦°♦°♦r♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦`� a♦°♦°♦°♦P♦° ♦°O°A°e°♦1♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦rt�♦ ♦°♦°♦°4A♦''�!°♦°O°♦°♦°d°♦'L♦'9't�� �,y<.:�1♦ ♦�Ar'♦♦♦°♦°♦� _' ': - ♦°������°,����r��°0���������� ♦����������i�� A��S��l����°e°�°�°�°�°�°�°�'♦►°;°�°O♦ ♦�i°i°i°i°e'��°A°i°i°e!�'�>J°eP1'b�Ar+�'+`�lA�,i°�°O°�°�e�°� ', e♦♦♦♦AAA♦♦,�w♦♦�♦A♦e♦♦♦A♦ ♦°♦♦♦♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦>♦♦ At,�♦!�e<♦c°vP♦®♦♦♦w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦A♦eA♦•>♦♦♦<�♦♦♦♦♦A♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦♦V♦♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦♦AF@♦e@♦!r>�♦♦♦'f,�Ot:<�+e<a,�>t♦Aw♦♦e♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦ - �-�+ �1°v°�°�r♦f°�°�°�°�'�O°♦♦ 4°.°4°W°EE`�S�V�°4♦AAA°e°A°r°�°O°�V<°�°�°�°�°�V�°�°�°♦°�°�°�°�°e°O�°�°�°?°�°�°A°♦°♦°♦'?>�a'�S°tVi'�J~�`�♦>o'+♦°♦°♦°♦C♦°O��V r �f' o♦♦♦o♦000♦♦oi♦i�+%<°.°�%%is%%%�o�<°��is��°°e,°���%%�Q°,°o�%��o°�%��ipi°���s�%°%%%%%%%i.°o�%sus°w�s�%%��%%%�3+Qa��.la�s?s��►�%♦�♦�DeO♦��• � � ♦°♦°i°o°♦°♦°♦°ceio''eA♦ei°♦°o°ieosihs°r°♦°s°i 6ioi°♦����<s�iss°�>i°♦°♦oi°e°o°c°♦°swi°♦°o°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°oe♦♦♦°♦°♦°.°s°♦s�!<°o•♦zoscis°i°i°io♦oisi�+o+ .� ♦♦♦♦s♦oo♦oA♦♦o♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦o♦ ►o<♦e�ov♦♦Qo♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦♦♦♦w<•ose.o+e�s♦♦♦♦♦♦o,� . .a� '� i°i°ism°�oi°i°i°�°i°i°�°�°i°i°e°i°i°i°�°i°�°�°i° i°i°i°i''i°o°y°i°v°��s°csi°s°i°i°c°i°e°i°i°i°�e�°�°�°i°rsi°i°i°��i<i°s♦°�°ism°:°o��*�i°i♦i°i°i!:°�'�'f f�-.�:'>�;� - ♦Aoo�♦�♦�♦�♦,♦�o�♦�♦�♦s♦�♦s♦♦�♦�?�ow♦�♦e e�s�c�oey�s�so°�♦�♦�.�♦es�,,ee�♦�♦�o�A�°Qs,♦�♦�♦�♦w♦�♦�e�♦�,��o�+�♦�e�♦�♦`e���♦�♦�♦�e�♦��e• ,._.ram,- ♦♦♦As♦♦ooe♦s♦♦♦♦♦+♦♦♦o♦.►♦.+♦♦o♦♦o♦!♦♦♦o♦so♦♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦♦♦soeoA�• ` ♦ ♦ o♦♦♦o�A�♦o♦o�♦e♦�q�♦�y♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦,�,�♦�°�o�o�♦�♦�,�y�♦e°�o�♦�♦�♦M­♦woWPw♦w♦w♦o♦�♦�o�♦�o�♦�♦�e�o<�9��.w �. ♦i AAJ,.♦♦ ♦♦♦♦V♦e0 sr�A�♦♦_�4►�P�♦.e�♦�e�♦�Os��'1��@���e���J���O�b�e���♦ �' . � _ , .do�♦�V�,►�V,A�ow•>�♦�♦�♦OVA♦r♦`°,♦�T - �♦�e�♦�e�eGw<°� Vicinity Map San Anconi. H-i lht: Key ❑ - King's Ranch Proposed City Improvements King's Ranch City Improvements 50' buffer ❑ King's Ranch Parcel King's Ranch Trails - Excluded from Easement Kings Ranch Revised Easement Placement 47-A a 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Mlles INLAND Richland Communities ATTACHMENT 2 N EMPIRE 47 Acre Conservation Easement Exhibit A RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT e'NAD zone llN arc RCD 2025 Fire Resiliency Appendix Helicopter Dip Tank: A helicopter dip tank is a self-contained water dispensing unit specifically designed to support rotary-wing aircraft engaged in aerial firefighting operations. The dip tank + serves as a tactical water source for helicopters equipped with snorkel or dip-tube systems, enabling rapid refilling in permanent or temporary locations. Helicopter Dip Tanks can be permanently constructed or temporarily located with portable devices and ,, connections to existing fire protection infrastructure. 1. Safety and Regulatory Compliance a. High-visibility paint or reflective tape for aerial and ground recognition. Clearly labeled with unit identification, water capacity, and operational instructions. b. Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1142 and applicable CAL FIRE or local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) standards for water supply units. c. Constructed and operated in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines. 2. Structural and Mechanical Components a. A minimum water storage capacity of 5,000 gallons, constructed of high- strength, UV-resistant polymer or aluminum alloy suitable for potable or non- potable water. b. Open-top or retractable lid design to accommodate helicopter snorkel access. c. May include onboard telemetry or manual gauges for monitoring water levels. d. Optional pump-assisted refill capability with quick-connect fittings for ground- based water sources. 3. Maintenance and Inspection a. Subject to regular inspection and maintenance protocols, including tank integrity, valve functionality, and water quality assurance. b. Maintenance records shall be retained in accordance with agency policy and available for audit. Page 634 Helipad: A helipad is a designated landing and takeoff area for rotary-wing aircraft, constructed and maintained to support safe and efficient helicopter operations. Helipads may be permanent or temporary and are utilized for emergency response, medical evacuation, firefighting, law -- enforcement, and other authorized aviation activities. The `t' helipad shall conform to applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing aviation safety, land use, and emergency access. 1. Site and Structural Specifications a. Constructed of reinforced concrete, asphalt, or other load-bearing materials capable of supporting helicopter weight and rotor wash. b. Surface shall be level, free of debris, and maintained to prevent foreign object damage. c. Minimum landing area diameter of 100 feet for aviation assets used by our regional partners. d. Safety perimeter extending at least 1.5 times the rotor diameter of the largest aircraft expected to use the site. e. Clearly marked with a white "H" centered within a contrasting circle, per FAA standards. f. Equipped with perimeter lighting, approach path indicators, and optional floodlights for night operations, where applicable. 2. Location and Access a. Located in areas zoned for aviation, emergency services, or public safety infrastructure, with approval from the AHJ. b. Sited to minimize noise, dust, and safety hazards to surrounding properties and populations. c. Accessible by emergency vehicles via paved or all-weather roadways. d. Integrated into local emergency response plans and mutual aid agreements. 3. Operational Standards a. Designed to accommodate specific helicopter types, with weight-bearing capacity and clearance zones verified by a licensed engineer. b. May include fueling stations, water supply points, or command post integration for specialized operations. c. Compliant with FAA regulations, including Part 91 and Part 135 operational standards, where applicable. Page 635 d. Subject to inspection and certification by aviation authorities and local fire departments. 4. Maintenance and Inspection a. Inspected regularly for surface integrity, lighting functionality, and obstruction clearance. b. Maintenance records shall be retained and made available to regulatory agencies upon request. The helipad shall be considered a critical infrastructure asset for emergency response and public safety operations. Its use shall be governed by operational protocols established by the AHJ, and it may be activated during declared emergencies, wildfire incidents, or other authorized events requiring aerial support. Page 636 RANCHO f�f CUCAMONGA 112 , Maintenance Agreement , onservation Easement , and CEQA Fi ndi ng U M N RANCHO Pro * ectOverview r GA r .- IN dk Jr Pant Point � .- " � � -`�. ' . � �: �. � _. ., � . ,� � -� .�� - � . -�� � �� T���. - •-�.., � - � ' ;, *. �_ y - M1r; r - rim '` {�+14 -��� � a`•-.tom� _ i _ .',X,-�,� �,��. `�v��ti's :b. ,� - -_ - � - OP up _+ ftlily , Ki ng = Trust Federa-1 Access Road -. an.. Ranc Trailhead�� iL U AM N A RANCHO Pro * ectOverview r P art' 'Point CVWD • tit. �� i■ ,'1;� ar 'J ••�- - •'dr:+'1 r1 fir.•: 1.�: 1 v r •� ,y• � ti - *_ 'ail • 'Y 'Y'..1 ti +{ti r.1, I• •' •' fir''1 t •1 r• .- _'' r ; y� '1 } ' � •�. Y � - ., �r a�C•::L}.r ti•ti r' ��. 1 - - r'• - •r, • .. '1.1 '�t'�� -r ry I r r•I{� �.:_ �• v �' .r. I -ti, 'F• � r ,:ti � • .. f T. ,� . 11'}� r ''�L+'�• i�i I Iti' .• •rti r'r ti - ti•' k. - ,�•• •'' •• -• - - f """ �1� .Y. •1 , r'� •1 1 'v. ,} 'J r ti:�t r _�' � r_ff''J�1 rI� _ •1~' ti ' r r•• •ti 4, ~r�� :1 r'11{• ' ti'' •r 1 1 � �I C7�IL •J. '� .. � •ti,' ',.'r' ��'• '• � •r• 1 �' 1 r r •-r. •.1' ti. •4 ~ 1 •'ti ti•Ir - 'ti rti �5 - .1 �. �. i rt •- •J• _ r .a I - ti•. I C��. r —�.�' r•'�•r 'r � Lf 1 r :ti• , r} _ rt6 King Family Trust - ��f� � r�r� 1 - 1 ti � a •, I'` y I ±,'- ' L i�ti'S JI I •' .� 1 •• • 1 I 1• 1{ ' ti • r 1 .{•. I r'••: •,'�-.•'_ .. •.r r• syi r. 1 f}Fr 1 1 - J ti� 1 �' r• .1 +I iJ• *�1`. -}. I r?' - 1 �1I - •r '•{ •,' .• _ _ .-s--rf^---., � •.- i _ .. % ',� :. ..S• ' .� , - __ _-•fir- •1 r •,f:�•�•+ ti I � �1 '� •+ •r• •'k ' � �• •r 1 ' ' - jog - 1 � 'y'r - f• y �. "tir•f. r}� ••ti I �' 1 '•r •5 _ .. r I -• r r 1�k'•� ,�; tit ti � 1 - y ��.• 1 •- - 1 _ •,. •y• ' r�' - •.. F.,�1,�' 'r � 'r '•' ti J ,• r•r � ++'_ , - 'rk • • ;� •� s •r•. • � `ram}�y} ti• ., _ • - i '- 1 .�1'-r}ti_ #. r.•.�:-V�.. ''I' �.• '• 4}, y_�J—'1rti'L'rl Jlti - ,r 5yy •. ti ••'_ 1� � .r' r r• �•� 1.' .• 'x',' •r S •-' I r3. �ti J- �•' r•' r r - 1• •� F• '•• r �y �1 1 .' 1 .1 ..'�• 1 'I �•• r r . ¢ L1 . 1 ' ti 'S.Fr �• .i I ..•'_ Lti• ••.�L}.5�. •rL. r•.I ;'— ''' L '• •, � r 1 �•� ,r� t.• ��•f•' ,. # •• + .: •i��'} •- -ti •• •• • ' , •• � ,• ' •• `rti -}�• 1 _ L`1 •I •1 I f_1. ,' •� ` -' r•r • •1•I••JJ.1 : I - � •I I. J f }.. f-.• ell 1 { .� ` I r~ ••� • •- •� �,■r til`•�•�'-'.I- �• r r .,1� • ' 1 ' • •' ~. 41l4� �Y,•r % • r A ,. I : Morgan Ranch9.� - } �� Trailhead �::'_: 1Lie- - r 106 t v — h I i �r 'KQ _ T 1 low r F t 0 40IVicinity Map San Antonia Key �� ❑ d ing s Ranch Proposed City Improvements .n� HiWSW Ad d ing's Ranch City Improvements 50' buffer W22rd5V g T + r Ming's Punch Parcel Z ing's Punch Trails - Excluded from Easementdo R r � • - .ti� � v�r tam i � ��tr�� t ® Kings RevisedEasement Placement - _ A � l' RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation • Approve the Maintenance Agreement ( Memorandum of Agreement) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District ( IEPCD) - Approve the Conservation Easement for approximately 120 acres located near Cucamonga Canyon [Assessor Parcel Numbers: Portion of 0200-OSI - 48 and 0200-OSI -49] - Authorize the City Manager to take all necessary actions and execute all documents required to effectuate the Conservation Easement; and Determine the Conservation Easement exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and consistent with the General Plan . Cr��� RANCHO CUCAMONGA Questions ? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mir ■ DATE: August 20, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the New City Manager's (Elisa Cox) Employment Agreement. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached employment agreement. between the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the new City Manager, Elisa Cox, effective December 1, 2025. BACKGROUND: John Gillison has served as City Manager for over fourteen years and started with the City in 2007. Former City Manager Jack Lam asked the City Council to consider hiring John as the new City Manager upon his retirement in 2011. John recently announced his pending retirement effective the end of this calendar year, and the City Council has selected Elisa Cox as the new City Manager, subject to approval of an employment agreement. ANALYSIS: Elisa began working for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2016 as Deputy City Manager and currently serves the City as the Assistant City Manager. She has over 22 years of experience in all phases of municipal government, including progressively responsible management and leadership experience in Parks and Recreation, Community Services, Human Resources and Risk Management, and Administration. She has a Bachelor of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism and a Masters of Business Administration with an emphasis in Marketing and Communications. She is an International City Management Association Credentialed Manager and actively participates in multiple professional organizations, showing her commitment to lifelong learning and forging relationships to help maintain and build on our innovative and community centered focus. Elisa Cox's credentials and breadth of experience and knowledge of the City will provide valuable continuity to support Rancho Cucamonga's values of excellence and carrying out City Council policy. Elisa Cox would be only the fourth City Manager for the City of Rancho Cucamonga since its incorporation in 1977. As City Manager, Elisa would oversee important projects including Brightline West, the Epicenter Master Plan, The 50th City Anniversary, the ever-changing Victoria Gardens, the HART District, and the West Side Library Expansion. The City Council considered available options to hire the next City Manager, did their due diligence through interviews and discussions, and directed the City Attorney to negotiate and bring back an Employment Agreement (Agreement)with Elisa Cox to be the next City Manager for their consideration. The Agreement outlines pay and benefits, and it provides for performance reviews with consideration for annual merit salary increases (in addition to regular non-merit increases). The proposed Agreement includes monthly pay at $26,667, which is within the approved City Page 637 Manager salary range of$21,655 to $30,856 per month. Benefits for the position are the same as those provided to the Executive Management Group.Additional benefits in the Agreement include additional amounts for deferred compensation and a retiree health saving account and costs for a yearly wellness physical. The Agreement requires the City Manager to pay her member contributions for her CalPERS retirement, 7% of pay, provides for reasonable reimbursement of business expenses, professional development costs, and participation in professional associations and organizations. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Employment Agreement for Elisa Cox as City Manager, effective December 1, 2025. In accordance with the Brown Act, an oral report of the proposed agreement will be provided to the City Council at the August 20th meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The new Employment Agreement will result in an annual decrease for January through June of fiscal year 2025-2026 of$30,000. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Approving this amendment to the City Manager's contract provides the ongoing leadership necessary to forward the Mission, Vision, Core Values, and Goals of the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Employment Agreement Page 3 Page 638 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into and shall be effective as of the 1st day of December 2025, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called the "City" and ELISA CLAIRE COX, hereinafter called "Employee:' RECITALS 1. City desires to retain the services of Employee in the position of City Manager, and Employee desires to be employed as City Manager of the City; 2. The City Council desires to: A. Encourage the highest standards of fidelity and public service on the part of Employee; B. Provide a just means for terminating Employee's employment and this Agreement when City or Employee may desire to do so; 3. The parties further desire to establish the Employee's conditions of employment. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained the parties agree as follows: 1. Duties. City hereby employs Employee as City Manager of City, Appointing Authority of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, and Executive Director of the Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Public Financing Authority to perform the functions and duties of the City Manager, Appointing Authority, and Executive Director as specified in City's Municipal Code and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council may from time to time assign to Employee. Employee agrees to devote Employee's full time and effort to the performance of this Agreement and to remain in the exclusive employ of City and not to become otherwise employed while this Agreement is in effect without the prior written approval of the City Council. 2. Ethical Commitments. The Employer expects the Employee to adhere to the highest professional standards. The Employee's actions will always comply with those standards. The Employee agrees to follow the Code of Ethics of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and the ethics rules, ATTACHMENT 1 Page 639 regulations, and laws of the State of California. Consistent with the standards outlined in the City's Municipal Code, the Employee shall not endorse candidates, make financial contributions, sign or circulate petitions, or participate in fundraising activities for individuals seeking or holding elected office, nor seek or accept any personal enrichment or profit derived from confidential information or misuse of public time. Neither the governing body nor any individual member thereof shall request Employee to endorse any candidate, make any financial contribution, sign or circulate any election-related petition, or participate in any fundraising activity for individuals seeking or holding elected office, nor to handle any matter of personnel other than in accordance with applicable laws, policies, and regulations. Should employee be terminated for not fulfilling request that violate the ethical commitments outlined in this section, it shall be considered "without Cause". 3. Hours of Work. Employee shall maintain a regular work schedule consistent with that approved by the City Council for other Executive Management employees of the City. Employee's duties may involve expenditures of time in excess of forty(40) hours per week and may also include time outside normal office hours such as attendance at City Council meetings. Employee shall not be entitled to additional compensation for such time.The parties agree that Employee's occasional absences from City Council meetings may be excused in accordance with Section 2.08.130 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 4. Term. This Agreement shall be effective December 1, 2025, and will remain in force and effect until terminated as provided in Section 12. 5. Salary. A. The City shall pay Employee for the performance of Employee's duties as City Manager under this Agreement, a monthly salary starting at$26,667. Salary and/or benefit adjustments shall be considered by the City Council annually in conjunction with Employee's annual performance evaluation pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement. B. Employee shall receive non-merit increases in the same amount and at the same time as that provided to other Executive Management employees. C. Non-merit and Base Salary increases approved by the City Council, pursuant to this Agreement, shall not require an amendment to this Agreement to be effective. Such may be set forth in an annual salary resolution or minute action approved by the City Council and ratified by resolution. Page 640 Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(c)(3), as that statute may be amended from time to time. D. City shall not, at any time during the term of this Agreement, reduce Employee's salary or benefits unless such reduction is imposed across-the- board for all Executive Management employees of the City. E. Employee shall pay seven percentage points of her PERSable compensation towards the CaIPERS member contribution. There will be no Employee Paid Member Contribution (EPMC). i. It is understood that all contributions paid by Employee as described in this section shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of Employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation. ii. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. 6. Benefits. Employee shall receive the same benefits, including leave accruals and cash out provisions, holidays and other benefits on the same terms and conditions as provided to other Executive Management employees, with the following exceptions: A. Deferred Compensation - City shall contribute 5% more than the highest amount provided to any other Executive Management employee into the employee's 401(a) plan. B. City shall contribute 5% more than the highest amount provided to any other Executive Management employee into Employee's 457 plan. C. The City shall contribute 3% of Employee's base salary into a Retirement Health Savings Program. D. Employee shall have a separate City Manager Employee Wellness benefit allowing for an annual full-day executive wellness physical examination at either Keck Medicine of USC or Loma Linda University Health or other medical institution provided to the Executive Management Group. Page 641 7. General Expenses and Business Equipment. City recognizes that certain expenses of a non-personal and job-related nature may be incurred by Employee. City agrees to reimburse Employee for reasonable expenses which are authorized by the City budget, and which are supported by expense receipts, statements or personal affidavits, and audit thereof in like manner as other demands against the City. 8. Official and Professional Development. City shall pay reasonable sums for professional dues and subscriptions for Employee necessary in the judgment of the City Council for Employee's continued participation in associations and organizations, which memberships are necessary and desirable for the continued professional development of Employee and for the good of the City, such as the League of California Cities, International City/County Management Association, and California City Management Foundation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council shall have discretion to establish appropriate amounts, in the annual City budget or otherwise, for official and professional development expenses and travel costs. 9. Performance Evaluation. The City Council shall review and evaluate Employee's performance annually each year starting in the third quarter of the year. 10. Indemnification. City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Employee against any claim, demand,judgment, or action of any type or kind arising within the course and scope of Employee's employment to the extent required by Government Code Sections 825 and 995. 11.Other Terms and Conditions of Employment. A. The City Council may from time to time fix other terms and conditions of employment relating to the performance of Employee, provided such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with or in conflict with the provision of this Agreement, the Municipal Code, or other applicable law. B. The provisions of the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations ("Rules") shall apply to Employee to the extent they explicitly apply to the position of City Manager, except that if the specific provisions of this Agreement conflict with the Rules, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.Without limiting the generality of the exception noted in the previous sentence, however, no provision of the Rules or this Agreement shall confer upon Employee a property right in Employee's employment or a right to be discharged only Page 642 upon cause during Employee's tenure as City Manager. At such times as Employee is serving as City Manager, Employee is an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the Council and may be dismissed at any time with or without cause, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement. C. Employee shall be exempt from paid overtime compensation and from Social Security taxes other than the mandatory Medicare portion of such taxes. 12.Termination of Employment and this Agreement; General Release; Severance: A. If City terminates this Agreement(thereby terminating Employee's employment)without Cause, as determined by the affirmative votes of a majority of the members of the City Council at a Regular Meeting of the City Council, and if Employee signs, delivers to the City Council, and does not revoke, a General Release Agreement proposed by the City, City shall pay Employee her then Base Salary for twelve (12) months, and shall provide twelve (12) months of health (medical, dental, and vision) benefits continuing under the benefit plans in which Employee and her dependents are then enrolled (the cash payment and continuing benefits, collectively "Severance"). B. If City terminates this Agreement(thereby terminating Employee's employment)with Cause, as determined by the affirmative votes of a majority of the members of the City Council at a Regular Meeting of the City Council, Employee shall not be entitled to any additional compensation or payment, including Severance, but shall be entitled only to accrued Base Salary and vacation pay, and any other accrued and unused benefit allowances according to their terms ("Accrued Salary and Benefits"). As used in this Agreement, Cause shall only mean any of the following: i. Conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendre to, any crime or offense (other than minor traffic violations or similar offenses)which is likely to have an adverse impact on the City or on the Employee's ability to carry out her duties; ii. Failure of the Employee to observe or perform any of her duties and obligations; iii. Conviction of any crime involving an "abuse of office or position,"as that term is defined in Government Code Section 53243.4; Page 643 iv. Failure to carry out a lawful directive or directives of the City Council made by the City Council as a body at a Brown Act compliant meeting; v. Dishonesty involving employment; vi. A breach of this agreement; and vii. Any negligent action or inaction by Employee that materially and adversely: (a) impedes or disrupts the operations of City or its organizational units; (b) is detrimental to employees or public safety; or(c)violates City's properly established rules or procedures. C. In the event the City terminates the Employee for any reason or no reason, the City and the Employee agree that no member of the City Council, the City Management staff, nor the Employee, shall make any written, oral or electronic statement to any member of the public, the press, or any City employee concerning the Employee's termination except in the form of a joint press release or statement, the content of which is mutually agreeable to the City and the Employee. The joint press release or statement shall not contain any text or information that is disparaging to either party. Either party may verbally repeat the substance of the joint press release or statement in response to any inquiry. D. In no event may Employee be terminated within ninety(90) days before or after any municipal election for the selection or recall of one or more of the members of the City Council. E. If, during the Term or any extended Term, Employee dies, Employee's estate shall receive Accrued Salary and Benefits but shall not be entitled to any additional compensation or payment, including Severance. F. In the event Employee is permanently disabled or is otherwise unable to perform her duties because of sickness, accident, injury, or mental incapacity for a period of three (3) consecutive months beyond any provided sick leave, the City may terminate Employee's employment and this Agreement. Page 644 G. Employee may resign from her employment at anytime, upon giving forty-five (45) days written notice to the City Council. 13.General Provisions. A. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. City and Employee hereby acknowledge that they have neither made nor accepted any other promise or obligation with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by Employee, approved by the City Council, and executed on behalf of the City. B. If any provision or any portion of this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect. C. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon delivery of notice to Employee, with or without cause, subject only to the requirements of section 12 above. Notice of termination (Employee's resignation)to City shall be given in writing to City, either by personal service or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to City as follows: Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Any notice to Employee shall be given in a like manner, and, if mailed, shall be addressed to Employee at the address then shown in City's personnel records. For the purpose of determining compliance with any time limit stated in this Agreement, a notice shall be deemed to have duly given (a) on the date of delivery, if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or (b) on the second (2nd) calendar day after mailing, if mailed in the manner provided in this section to the party to whom notice is to be given. Notwithstanding the forgoing, this Agreement shall automatically terminate on the death or permanent disability of Employee. Employee agrees to give City not less than 45 calendar days'written notice of her resignation. The City Page 645 also agrees to provide Employee written notice of intent to terminate not less than 45 calendar days of the effective date of her termination. Further, Employee shall not be removed from office, other than for cause, during or within a period of ninety days succeeding any general or special municipal election in which a new city councilmember is elected, or when a new city councilmember is appointed. D. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party in that action shall be entitled to reasonable and actual attorneys'fees and costs with respect to the prosecution or defense of the action. E. A waiver of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a general waiver by the City and the City shall be free to enforce any term or condition of this Agreement with or without notice to Employee notwithstanding any prior waiver of that term or condition. This Agreement is entered into this day of ) 2025. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Mayor L. Dennis Michael City Manager Elisa C. Cox Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney Page 646