HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/09/03 - Regular City Council Meeting Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 1
Mayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
September 3, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION
REGULAR MEETINGS
TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the
concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found
at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department
at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to
Resolution No. 2023-086.
Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the
agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on
the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.
TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A.ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B.PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C.CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 2
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE,
FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN
RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION
(RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
GROUP. (CITY)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF
SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. D/B/A
ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. (CITY)
E. RECESS
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 3
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B.ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
B1. San Antonio Regional Hospital Update on Healthcare Developments and Legislation Related to Healthcare.
B2. Presentation in Honor of National Senior Center Month.
C.PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing
Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any
item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the
Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.
Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed
directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members
of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please
refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs,
disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City
Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council
Chambers.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
---
---
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 4
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon
without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D.CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 20, 2025.
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,515,179.37 and City
and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in
the Total Amount of $3,489,113.35 Dated August 11, 2025 Through August 24, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $250.08 Dated August 11, 2025 Through August 24, 2025.
(CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of July 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5. Consideration of Reappointment of Planning Commissioners to Four-Year Terms. (CITY)
D6. Consideration of a Transfer of Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000 from General Fund to Measure I Fund
for Street Striping and Pavement Marking. (CITY)
D7. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $40,457 from the Homeland Security Grant for the Purchase
of Eight Ballistic Shields Through a Competitive Bid. (CITY)
D8. Consideration of an Award of Professional Services Agreements for Five-Year On-Call Contracts for Various
Disciplines for Fiscal Years 2025/26 through 2029/30. (CITY/FIRE)
D9. Consideration to Enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Ontario for a Pavement Resurfacing of
the Southern Half of the Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street Intersection as Part of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Major
Arterial Paving Program. (CITY)
D10. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP for Legal Services
Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)
D11. Consideration of the Purchase of Bendix King Radios and Miscellaneous Related Equipment, in the Amount of
$113,100, from 49er Communications, in Accordance with the NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Master
Agreement No. 00318, CA Addenda 7-22-70-49-18. (FIRE)
D12. Consideration of Amendment No. 004 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for
Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project. (FIRE)
D13. Consideration of a Managed Services Agreement (CO 2025-084) in the Total Amount of $270,000 and a
Software Maintenance and Support Agreement (CO 2025-085) in the Total Amount of $411,000 from the
Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) with Advanced Utility Systems for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
Customer Information System Infinity Billing Software and Online Payment Portal Platform. (CITY)
7
8
21
23
102
104
106
108
113
124
140
142
144
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 5
D14. Consideration of a Contract with Mariposa Landscape, Inc. for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape
Maintenance in the Amount of $974,922 for FY 2025/26. (CITY/FIRE)
D15. Consideration of a Contract with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMDs 6R, 9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and
Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $772,181 for FY 2025/26.
(CITY)
D16. Consideration of a Cooperative Agreement for Stadium Modernization Improvements for FY 25/26 with Rancho
Baseball LLC (DBH) and Request for an Appropriation of $275,000 to Complete the Identified Improvements for
FY 25/26. (CITY)
D17. Consideration to Approve the Execution of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
Number 2021-079 Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and CR&A Custom Inc. to Increase the Total Not-
to-Exceed Amount from $154,000 to $210,000 for the Remaining Term of the Agreement. (CITY)
D18. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-155 Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Clair Global Integration, LLC. for Proactive Inspections and Maintenance of the City’s Audio-Visual Systems,
Extending the Term by One (1) Year in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $86,970. (CITY)
D19. Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 2022-009 with Hunter Consulting Inc., dba HCI
Environmental & Engineering for Hazardous Waste Cleanup and Removal in an Amount Not to Exceed
$103,000 for City and Fire District Services in FY 2025/2026. (CITY/FIRE)
D20. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements located on 12434 4th Street per Improvement Agreement,
Related to Case No. DRC2020-00202, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Bonds. (CITY)
D21. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and
Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
D22. Consideration of a Resolution Waiving the Collection of Certain Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees
for Fiscal Year 2025-26. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-023) (FIRE)
D23. Consideration of Approval to Rescind Resolution No. FD 2025-022; Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention
to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 88-25-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1; and Set a
Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-024) (FIRE)
E.CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
ORDINANCE NO. 1045
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
16.36.09 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADDING CHAPTER 17.84 TO THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITIES,
AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION FROM CEQA
F.ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
186
313
425
432
435
439
441
444
447
457
472
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 6
G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 1046, to Adopt Zoning Map
Amendment to Change the Zoning Map Designation for Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-2, and 16072-3, Located
at the North West Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue, from Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) to Low
Residential (L), to Ensure Consistency with the Configuration and Development Standards of a Previously
Approved 359 Lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision, Consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Designation of Traditional Neighborhood. This Project Qualifies for an Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3), as the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment will not have any Direct Impact on the
Environment. (DRC2025-00141) (ORDINANCE NO. 1046) (CITY)
H.CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration to Receive and File the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study and to Direct
Staff to Pursue Options to Implement the Improvements. (CITY)
H2. Quarterly Development Update - Second Quarter 2025. (CITY)
I.COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J.CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K.IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L.ADJOURNMENT- Adjourn to Tuesday, September 16, 2025, at 7:00 p.m.
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty
of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk
Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
479
504
593
---
---
Regional
Healthcare Update
John Chapman
President & CEO San Antonio Regional Hospital
Regional CEO, HASC Southern California
California Hospital CrisisHospital Stability
California Hospital CrisisHospital Stability
Nursing & Allied HealthWorkforce
Physician ShortagePublic Health
Lack of ResourcesBehavioral Health
Demographics of Patients in 91730, 91701, 91739,
& 91737 (n=113,479)
12.84% or 14,567 are diagnosed with Mental
Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
43.2%
56.8%
0.13%
12%
35.1%
0.76%
9.8%
34.7%
2%
2%
10%
20%
37%
30%
Clinical Diagnosis- 91730, 91701, 91739, & 91737
Reference: SpeedTrack, HQIP Analytics
Mental & Behavioral Health- 91730, 91701, 91739,
& 91737
Reference: SpeedTrack, HQIP Analytics
New Residency Programs
Behavioral Health Urgent Care
Loss of Maternity UnitsMaternity Crisis
SARH NEW MATERNITY UNIT
Senior Care ConcernsPopulation Health
Center of Aging
NATIONAL SENIOR
CENTER MONTH
James L. Brulte Senior Center
Why Senior Centers Matter
•Senior Centers provide a place for community member to engage, play, celebrate, and
grow!
•Nearly 38% of Rancho Cucamonga residents are age 50 or older, and senior center
participants already engage at high levels - 75% visit weekly and spend an average of 3.3
hours per visit.
•These facts highlight the critical role senior centers play in providing social, recreational,
and supportive services to a growing segment of the community.
Celebrating National Senior Center
Month
•“Powering Possibilities: Flip the Script”
•National Senior Center Month Celebrations
•Coffee & Donuts
•Dance Celebration
•V.I.P. Club Member Breakfast
•Country Western Dance
•Annual Health & Wellness Fair
•Free Workshops, Tabling's, Giveaways and
more throughout the month
A Hub for Health, Wellness & Connection
There are many ways to engage and connect at the James L. Brulte
Senior Center!
•Nutrition and Wellness
•Clubs & Social Engagement
•Special Events & Celebrations
•Health & Support Services
•Learning & Enrichment
•Community & Amenities
Real Stories, Real Im pact
"I am retired and live just 10 minutes
down the street. I have been coming to
the senior center since before COVID.
Everything I need in my retirement is
here at the center. I love to come to the
senior center to meet new people and
dance. I attend the FSA lunch and VIP
Club and will sit in new places to meet
beautiful new people.
Everyone here, the staff and the
seniors, are all so amazing."
Margaret Rodriguez,
Rancho Cucamonga Resident
"I retired after COVID and was looking for a
place to keep my mind and body active. One
day, I explored and came across the Playful
Seniors Acting Club,where I found a very
welcoming group that invited me in and kept
me coming back. After the former club leader
passed, I decided to step up to help keep this
club and the Gin Rummy Club going strong, so
we can continue welcoming more seniors.
I love the social connections I make through
these clubs and that I can use the gym to help
keep my body active."
Robert McIntyre,
Rancho Cucamonga Resident
"The Senior Center is an important outlet for
me to socialize. I love to dance and really
enjoy all the dances and events the senior
program staff puts on. It's much better than
staying home and becoming stagnant.
I always look forward to coming to the
Center, I love how accessible it is. The
Senior Center motivates me and keeps me
going. It gives me a reason to push through
tough days, and I leave here feeling uplifted
and inspired."
Eliseo Guzm an AKA "Bibi",
Rancho Cucamonga Resident
Looking Ahead: Growing with our
Community
New to the James L. Brulte Senior Center:
•Monthly Movie Matinee Program
•Monthly engagement activities
•Increased number of yearly dances
•Resource guide launching at the end of
this year 2025
•Equipment replacement in Wellness Pass
Questions
*DRAFT*
August 20, 2025 | City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 1
August 20, 2025
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
The City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, August 20, 2025 in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at
City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order
at 3:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
Present were Council Members Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor
L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of
Administrative Services; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director.
Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance
A.PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
None.
B.ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
B1. Infrastructure & Capital Replacements Study Session. (Verbal Report) (CITY)
Mayor Michael welcomed Adam Probolsky, President of Probolsky Research, to the meeting. Assistant City Manager Cox
provided a brief overview, and Mr. Probolsky summarized the findings of a voter poll conducted by his company in the
city, which included satisfaction levels regarding infrastructure and capital replacements.
C.ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 3:42 p.m.
Approved:
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Page 7
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Melanie Morris, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the
Total Amount of $2,515,179.37 and City and Fire District Weekly Check
Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas
Company) in the Total Amount of $3,489,113.35 Dated August 11, 2025
Through August 24, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,377,947.13 and $1,137,232.24 for the City and
the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $3,350,900.93 and
$138,212.42 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 8
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 1 of 12
Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Payment Date On or After: 08/11/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 08/24/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Sheila Duke-
Sexton: 08/11/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453628 08/11/2025 Sheila Duke-Sexton 35,047.10 0 35,047.10
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453655 08/13/2025 Frontier Comm 0 305.34 305.34
Supplier Payment: Nationwide
Premium Holding: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Nationwide Premium
Holding
971.52 0 971.52
Supplier Payment: South Coast
Aqmd: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453704 08/13/2025 South Coast Aqmd 170.94 0 170.94
Supplier Payment: Bern Marie'S
Promotional Products: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453637 08/13/2025 Bern Marie'S Promotional
Products
942.55 0 942.55
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Grainger 1,336.17 0 1,336.17
Supplier Payment: Parkhouse Tire
Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453687 08/13/2025 Parkhouse Tire Inc 846.02 0 846.02
Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453642 08/13/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 866.71 0 866.71
Supplier Payment: Hdl Coren &
Cone: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453662 08/13/2025 Hdl Coren & Cone 795.00 0 795.00
Supplier Payment: Cameron
Welding: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453640 08/13/2025 Cameron Welding 130.10 0 130.10
Supplier Payment: Re Astoria 2 Llc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Re Astoria 2 Llc 73,005.05 0 73,005.05
Supplier Payment: Ontario Ice
Skating Center: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453685 08/13/2025 Ontario Ice Skating Center 2,835.00 0 2,835.00
Supplier Payment: Bound Tree
Medical Llc: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453639 08/13/2025 Bound Tree Medical Llc 0 603.45 603.45
Supplier Payment: Anne Marie
Dunn: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Anne Marie Dunn 568.00 0 568.00
Supplier Payment: Corodata Media
Storage Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453645 08/13/2025 Corodata Media Storage
Inc
96.99 0 96.99
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Dlr Group Inc 23,085.00 0 23,085.00
Supplier Payment: Advanced
Chemical Transport Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453629 08/13/2025 Advanced Chemical
Transport Inc
1,833.50 0 1,833.50
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 9
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 2 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Parma:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453688 08/13/2025 Parma 300.00 0 300.00
Supplier Payment: Midwest
Veterinary Supply Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453678 08/13/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply
Inc
239.97 0 239.97
Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart
Technology Solutions: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453682 08/13/2025 Mrc Smart Technology
Solutions
400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Us Department
Of Energy: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Us Department Of Energy 10,269.66 0 10,269.66
Supplier Payment: Hci
Environmental & Engineering Svc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Hci Environmental &
Engineering Svc
2,930.00 0 2,930.00
Supplier Payment: West Coast Fire
Sales: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453722 08/13/2025 West Coast Fire Sales 0 904.45 904.45
Supplier Payment: West Coast
Arborists Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453721 08/13/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 181,809.20 0 181,809.20
Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog
Center: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453692 08/13/2025 Rancho Smog Center 499.50 0 499.50
Supplier Payment: Augeo Affinity
Marketing Inc: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453634 08/13/2025 Augeo Affinity Marketing
Inc
0 2,085.00 2,085.00
Supplier Payment: Vision Service
Plan Ca: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453717 08/13/2025 Vision Service Plan Ca 12,182.87 0 12,182.87
Supplier Payment: Reach Media
Network: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453694 08/13/2025 Reach Media Network 4,000.00 0 4,000.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 San Bernardino County 61.00 0 61.00
Supplier Payment: Express Brake
Supply Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453654 08/13/2025 Express Brake Supply Inc 86.60 0 86.60
Supplier Payment: Socal Gas -
Remit-To: Yard - Socal Gas:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453703 08/13/2025 Socal Gas 1,617.93 0 1,617.93
Supplier Payment: Antelope
Expansion 3B Llc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453633 08/13/2025 Antelope Expansion 3B Llc 29,248.96 0 29,248.96
Supplier Payment: Rialto Animal
Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453695 08/13/2025 Rialto Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453719 08/13/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 98.49 0 98.49
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453698 08/13/2025 San Bernardino County 31,337.12 0 31,337.12
Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453646 08/13/2025 Covetrus North America 497.28 0 497.28
Page 10
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 3 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr
Supply Company: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453676 08/13/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply
Company
30.95 0 30.95
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453630 08/13/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 442.69 442.69
Supplier Payment: Jl Group Llc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453671 08/13/2025 Jl Group Llc 25,700.72 0 25,700.72
Supplier Payment: Thomson
Reuters - West: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453712 08/13/2025 Thomson Reuters - West 398.00 0 398.00
Supplier Payment: Barbara'S
Answering Service: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453636 08/13/2025 Barbara'S Answering
Service
552.00 0 552.00
Supplier Payment: The Counseling
Team International: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453707 08/13/2025 The Counseling Team
International
0 750.00 750.00
Supplier Payment: The Remy
Corporation: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453709 08/13/2025 The Remy Corporation 16,335.00 0 16,335.00
Supplier Payment: White Cap Lp:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453723 08/13/2025 White Cap Lp 540.84 0 540.84
Supplier Payment: Patton Sales
Corp: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453690 08/13/2025 Patton Sales Corp 81.83 0 81.83
Supplier Payment: Ids Group Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453668 08/13/2025 Ids Group Inc 551.20 0 551.20
Supplier Payment: Montgomery
Hardware Co: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453680 08/13/2025 Montgomery Hardware Co 413.49 0 413.49
Supplier Payment: The Sign Shop:
08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453710 08/13/2025 The Sign Shop 0 32.22 32.22
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
08/13/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 101.30 101.30
Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness
Repair Shop: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453644 08/13/2025 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 4,787.33 0 4,787.33
Supplier Payment: Alta Rancho Pet
& Bird Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453632 08/13/2025 Alta Rancho Pet & Bird
Hospital
600.00 0 600.00
Supplier Payment: Verizon
Wireless - La: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453715 08/13/2025 Verizon Wireless - La 253.72 0 253.72
Supplier Payment: Felicity USA
Management Services LLC:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Felicity USA Management
Services LLC
1,998.00 0 1,998.00
Supplier Payment: Kennedy
Equipment Co Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453672 08/13/2025 Kennedy Equipment Co Inc 18.45 0 18.45
Supplier Payment: Upland Animal
Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453714 08/13/2025 Upland Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00
Page 11
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 4 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Absolute
Security International Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Absolute Security
International Inc
17,360.21 0 17,360.21
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Sheriffs Dept: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453702 08/13/2025 San Bernardino County
Sheriffs Dept
1,995.40 0 1,995.40
Supplier Payment: Chaffey Joint
Union High School District:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Chaffey Joint Union High
School District
33,000.00 0 33,000.00
Supplier Payment: Pars:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453689 08/13/2025 Pars 3,500.00 0 3,500.00
Supplier Payment: Fun Service:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453658 08/13/2025 Fun Service 1,770.00 0 1,770.00
Supplier Payment: O S T S Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453686 08/13/2025 O S T S Inc 2,520.00 0 2,520.00
Supplier Payment: Ups: 08/13/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Ups 43.38 0 43.38
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
Co Auditor Cont: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453697 08/13/2025 San Bernardino Co Auditor
Cont
15,737.26 0 15,737.26
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks
Vet Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453661 08/13/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: 360 Deep
Cleaning Llc: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
08/13/2025 360 Deep Cleaning Llc 0 9,630.00 9,630.00
Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453657 08/13/2025 Fuel Serv 2,455.00 0 2,455.00
Supplier Payment: Itron Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453669 08/13/2025 Itron Inc 11,739.28 0 11,739.28
Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 G/M Business Interiors 134.59 0 134.59
Supplier Payment: Idexx
Distribution Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453667 08/13/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 1,930.18 0 1,930.18
Supplier Payment: Hernandez
Group Llc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453664 08/13/2025 Hernandez Group Llc 1,010.81 0 1,010.81
Supplier Payment: Rancho West
Animal Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453693 08/13/2025 Rancho West Animal
Hospital
400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Standard
Insurance Company: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453705 08/13/2025 Standard Insurance
Company
15,054.06 0 15,054.06
Supplier Payment: Motive Energy
Llc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453681 08/13/2025 Motive Energy Llc 90.29 0 90.29
Supplier Payment: Richards
Watson & Gershon: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
91,971.85 0 91,971.85
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453684 08/13/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 5,315.68 0 5,315.68
Page 12
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 5 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: D & K Concrete
Company: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453647 08/13/2025 D & K Concrete Company 2,515.97 0 2,515.97
Supplier Payment: Henry Schein
Inc: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453663 08/13/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 115.37 115.37
Supplier Payment: Pacific Utility
Installation Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Pacific Utility Installation
Inc
67,195.00 0 67,195.00
Supplier Payment: Terra Vista
Animal Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453706 08/13/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths
Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 487.07 0 487.07
Supplier Payment: Mmasc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453679 08/13/2025 Mmasc 625.00 0 625.00
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock
Co Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453666 08/13/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 1,264.98 0 1,264.98
Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange
County Janitorial Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453641 08/13/2025 Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc
145,193.36 0 145,193.36
Supplier Payment: Dependable
Break Room Solutions Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453648 08/13/2025 Dependable Break Room
Solutions Inc
141.41 0 141.41
Supplier Payment: Work Boot
Warehouse: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453724 08/13/2025 Work Boot Warehouse 1,061.37 0 1,061.37
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453720 08/13/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 0 7,865.93 7,865.93
Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Shoeteria Inc 2,826.51 0 2,826.51
Supplier Payment: Postal Perfect:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453691 08/13/2025 Postal Perfect 20.00 0 20.00
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453631 08/13/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 2,889.59 0 2,889.59
Supplier Payment: Liebert Cassidy
Whitmore: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453675 08/13/2025 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 6,501.00 0 6,501.00
Supplier Payment: Graphics
Factory Printing Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Graphics Factory Printing
Inc
46.33 0 46.33
Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453713 08/13/2025 Tirehub Llc 2,267.81 0 2,267.81
Supplier Payment: Gibson
Transportation Consulting, Inc.:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453660 08/13/2025 Gibson Transportation
Consulting, Inc.
14,350.00 0 14,350.00
Supplier Payment: Eighth Avenue
Enterprise Llc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453650 08/13/2025 Eighth Avenue Enterprise
Llc
352.34 0 352.34
Page 13
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 6 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Flood Control District:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453700 08/13/2025 San Bernardino County
Flood Control District
278,191.00 0 278,191.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
Cnty Auditor Controller: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453696 08/13/2025 San Bernardino Cnty
Auditor Controller
27,876.51 0 27,876.51
Supplier Payment: AVI-SPL LLC:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453635 08/13/2025 AVI-SPL LLC 91,862.88 0 91,862.88
Supplier Payment: J J Keller &
Associates Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453670 08/13/2025 J J Keller & Associates Inc 120.50 0 120.50
Supplier Payment: The Kindred
Corporation: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453708 08/13/2025 The Kindred Corporation 1,260.59 0 1,260.59
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453656 08/13/2025 Frontier Comm 362.81 0 362.81
Supplier Payment: Directv:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453649 08/13/2025 Directv 180.99 0 180.99
Supplier Payment: International
Language School For: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 International Language
School For
735.00 0 735.00
Supplier Payment: Mercury
Disposal Systems Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453677 08/13/2025 Mercury Disposal Systems
Inc
2,788.65 0 2,788.65
Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Aufbau Corporation 63,205.00 0 63,205.00
Supplier Payment: Brendon Fung:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Brendon Fung 7,310.00 0 7,310.00
Supplier Payment: Newco
Distributors Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453683 08/13/2025 Newco Distributors Inc 1,386.53 0 1,386.53
Supplier Payment: Labastida
Construction: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453674 08/13/2025 Labastida Construction 3,500.00 0 3,500.00
Supplier Payment: Environment
Planning Dvmt Solutions:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453652 08/13/2025 Environment Planning
Dvmt Solutions
3,290.00 0 3,290.00
Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453716 08/13/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Best Equipment
Service: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453638 08/13/2025 Best Equipment Service 421.32 0 421.32
Supplier Payment: Clair Global
Integration LLC: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453643 08/13/2025 Clair Global Integration
LLC
1,200.00 0 1,200.00
Supplier Payment: Gateway Pet
Cemetery & Crematory: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453659 08/13/2025 Gateway Pet Cemetery &
Crematory
1,696.00 0 1,696.00
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Psa Print Group 485.44 0 485.44
Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc:
08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
08/13/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 543.56 543.56
Page 14
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 7 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Registrar Of Voters:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453701 08/13/2025 San Bernardino County
Registrar Of Voters
66.51 0 66.51
Supplier Payment: Experian:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453653 08/13/2025 Experian 50.00 0 50.00
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
17,286.16 0 17,286.16
Supplier Payment: Employment
Development Dept: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453651 08/13/2025 Employment Development
Dept
7,553.00 0 7,553.00
Supplier Payment: Thompson
Plumbing Supply Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453711 08/13/2025 Thompson Plumbing
Supply Inc
742.82 0 742.82
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Sharon Ott 2,262.00 0 2,262.00
Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet
Nutrition Sales Inc: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453665 08/13/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales
Inc
2,871.06 0 2,871.06
Supplier Payment: Delta Dental Of
California: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Delta Dental Of California 47,356.73 0 47,356.73
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/13/2025 Napa Auto Parts 1,773.70 0 1,773.70
Supplier Payment: Kingdom
Calibrations Inc: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453673 08/13/2025 Kingdom Calibrations Inc 0 968.32 968.32
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/13/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453699 08/13/2025 San Bernardino County 0 13,227.92 13,227.92
Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453718 08/13/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 231.36 0 231.36
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453725 08/13/2025 C V W D 105,057.97 0 105,057.97
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 08/13/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453726 08/13/2025 Southern California Edison 6,588.26 0 6,588.26
Supplier Payment: Nearmap Us
Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453783 08/18/2025 Nearmap Us Inc 33,577.30 0 33,577.30
Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith
Llp: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453777 08/18/2025 Lozano Smith Llp 580.00 0 580.00
Supplier Payment: Bordin Semmer
Llp: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453757 08/18/2025 Bordin Semmer Llp 1,790.00 0 1,790.00
Supplier Payment: Adobe Animal
Hospital: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453751 08/18/2025 Adobe Animal Hospital 400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Mark Thomas &
Company, Inc.: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453778 08/18/2025 Mark Thomas & Company,
Inc.
37,704.50 0 37,704.50
Supplier Payment: Transtech
Engineers Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453798 08/18/2025 Transtech Engineers Inc 984.00 0 984.00
Page 15
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 8 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453760 08/18/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 181.10 0 181.10
Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Yunex Llc 2,411.00 0 2,411.00
Supplier Payment: Dependable
Break Room Solutions Inc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453763 08/18/2025 Dependable Break Room
Solutions Inc
15.00 0 15.00
Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Aufbau Corporation 167,452.50 0 167,452.50
Supplier Payment: Abound Food
Care: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453750 08/18/2025 Abound Food Care 2,838.91 0 2,838.91
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453785 08/18/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 366.96 0 366.96
Supplier Payment: Graceful Animal
Hospital: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453773 08/18/2025 Graceful Animal Hospital 800.00 0 800.00
Supplier Payment: Ontario Spay &
Neuter Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453786 08/18/2025 Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc 490.00 0 490.00
Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453759 08/18/2025 Cintas Corporation 1,346.86 0 1,346.86
Supplier Payment: American
Asphalt South, Inc.: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453753 08/18/2025 American Asphalt South,
Inc.
286,785.77 0 286,785.77
Supplier Payment: City Of
Riverside: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 City Of Riverside 6,909.00 0 6,909.00
Supplier Payment: Red Wing
Business Advantage Account:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453791 08/18/2025 Red Wing Business
Advantage Account
352.30 0 352.30
Supplier Payment: WP Electric &
Communications Inc.: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453802 08/18/2025 WP Electric &
Communications Inc.
16,796.49 0 16,796.49
Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins
Llp: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453761 08/18/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 5,625.50 0 5,625.50
Supplier Payment: Henry Schein
Inc: 08/18/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453774 08/18/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 87.97 87.97
Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453801 08/18/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 300.00 0 300.00
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453752 08/18/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 331.34 0 331.34
Supplier Payment: Esi Acquisition
Inc: 08/18/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453766 08/18/2025 Esi Acquisition Inc 0 32,120.56 32,120.56
Supplier Payment: First American
Data Tree Llc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453768 08/18/2025 First American Data Tree
Llc
1,800.00 0 1,800.00
Page 16
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 9 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Robert
Wollenzier: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453792 08/18/2025 Robert Wollenzier 350.00 0 350.00
Supplier Payment: Southern
California News Group: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453796 08/18/2025 Southern California News
Group
4,957.75 0 4,957.75
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453795 08/18/2025 Southern California Edison 136.18 0 136.18
Supplier Payment: Mig Inc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453780 08/18/2025 Mig Inc 4,530.00 0 4,530.00
Supplier Payment: Costar Realty
Information Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453762 08/18/2025 Costar Realty Information
Inc
1,915.80 0 1,915.80
Supplier Payment: EN Engineering,
LLC: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453765 08/18/2025 EN Engineering, LLC 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: Pepe'S Towing
Service: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453788 08/18/2025 Pepe'S Towing Service 540.00 0 540.00
Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453771 08/18/2025 Fuel Serv 299.18 0 299.18
Supplier Payment: Underground
Service Alert/Sc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453800 08/18/2025 Underground Service
Alert/Sc
150.60 0 150.60
Supplier Payment: Uline:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453799 08/18/2025 Uline 516.78 0 516.78
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks
Vet Hospital: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453772 08/18/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 600.00 0 600.00
Supplier Payment: AVI-SPL LLC:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453754 08/18/2025 AVI-SPL LLC 470.57 0 470.57
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/18/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453793 08/18/2025 San Bernardino County 0 18,064.48 18,064.48
Supplier Payment: Shred Pros:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453794 08/18/2025 Shred Pros 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Pedrag V. Pecic:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Pedrag V. Pecic 3,000.00 0 3,000.00
Supplier Payment: Parkhouse Tire
Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453787 08/18/2025 Parkhouse Tire Inc 980.72 0 980.72
Supplier Payment: Humane Society
Of San Bernardino Valley:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453775 08/18/2025 Humane Society Of San
Bernardino Valley
75.00 0 75.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Valley
Hope Partners: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453776 08/18/2025 Inland Valley Hope
Partners
3,174.13 0 3,174.13
Supplier Payment: Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber Of
Commerce: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453790 08/18/2025 Rancho Cucamonga
Chamber Of Commerce
5,350.00 0 5,350.00
Page 17
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 10 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/18/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453769 08/18/2025 Frontier Comm 0 470.95 470.95
Supplier Payment: Montgomery
Hardware Co: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453781 08/18/2025 Montgomery Hardware Co 729.10 0 729.10
Supplier Payment: Express Brake
Supply Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453767 08/18/2025 Express Brake Supply Inc 240.44 0 240.44
Supplier Payment: Bibliotheca Llc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453755 08/18/2025 Bibliotheca Llc 14,171.85 0 14,171.85
Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453756 08/18/2025 Boot Barn Inc 872.36 0 872.36
Supplier Payment: Brinks
Incorporated: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Brinks Incorporated 3,321.90 0 3,321.90
Supplier Payment: The Ecohero
Show Llc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453797 08/18/2025 The Ecohero Show Llc 2,500.00 0 2,500.00
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453784 08/18/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
826.00 0 826.00
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Napa Auto Parts 156.95 0 156.95
Supplier Payment: Graves & King
Llp: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Graves & King Llp 1,440.00 0 1,440.00
Supplier Payment: Carahsoft
Technology Corp: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453758 08/18/2025 Carahsoft Technology Corp 65,027.05 0 65,027.05
Supplier Payment: Alliant Insurance
Services Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Alliant Insurance Services
Inc
14,474.00 0 14,474.00
Supplier Payment: Midwest
Veterinary Supply Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453779 08/18/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply
Inc
817.44 0 817.44
Supplier Payment: Quiq
Incorporated: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453789 08/18/2025 Quiq Incorporated 10,000.00 0 10,000.00
Supplier Payment: Dudek:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453764 08/18/2025 Dudek 3,202.50 0 3,202.50
Supplier Payment: Constellation
Energy Generation Llc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Constellation Energy
Generation Llc
890,071.20 0 890,071.20
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453782 08/18/2025 Mwi Animal Health 3,418.64 0 3,418.64
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453770 08/18/2025 Frontier Comm 61.55 0 61.55
Supplier Payment: Richards
Watson & Gershon: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
3,672.00 0 3,672.00
Supplier Payment: Ivanti Inc:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453804 08/18/2025 Ivanti Inc 31,376.00 0 31,376.00
Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths
Inc: 08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/18/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 37.72 0 37.72
Page 18
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 11 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
08/18/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453803 08/18/2025 C V W D 32,899.26 0 32,899.26
Supplier Payment: Esri: 08/21/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2025 Esri 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Sheriffs Dept: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453832 08/21/2025 San Bernardino County
Sheriffs Dept
1,396.78 0 1,396.78
Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc:
08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453821 08/21/2025 Hose-Man Inc 117.16 0 117.16
Supplier Payment: Little Bear
Productions: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453823 08/21/2025 Little Bear Productions 6,475.00 0 6,475.00
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453816 08/21/2025 C V W D 0 256.24 256.24
Supplier Payment: Rialto Power
Equipment Co: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453829 08/21/2025 Rialto Power Equipment Co 0 21.92 21.92
Supplier Payment: Pepe'S Towing
Service: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453827 08/21/2025 Pepe'S Towing Service 360.00 0 360.00
Supplier Payment: DPrep Inc:
08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453817 08/21/2025 DPrep Inc 159.00 0 159.00
Supplier Payment: The Counseling
Team International: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453840 08/21/2025 The Counseling Team
International
0 3,410.00 3,410.00
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453825 08/21/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
89.00 0 89.00
Supplier Payment: Pristine
Uniforms Llc: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453828 08/21/2025 Pristine Uniforms Llc 0 43.10 43.10
Supplier Payment: Creative West:
08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453815 08/21/2025 Creative West 250.00 0 250.00
Supplier Payment: The Counseling
Team International: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453839 08/21/2025 The Counseling Team
International
0 1,760.00 1,760.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Registrar Of Voters:
08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453831 08/21/2025 San Bernardino County
Registrar Of Voters
0 66.51 66.51
Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 17,682.54 0 17,682.54
Supplier Payment: Calif
Underground Fac Safe Excavation
Board: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453814 08/21/2025 Calif Underground Fac
Safe Excavation Board
63.45 0 63.45
Supplier Payment: Medline
Industries Lp: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453824 08/21/2025 Medline Industries Lp 906.72 0 906.72
Page 19
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:59 AM
08/26/2025
Page 12 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: I Create
Professionals Consulting:
08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453822 08/21/2025 I Create Professionals
Consulting
0 15,000.00 15,000.00
Supplier Payment: Eighth Avenue
Enterprise Llc: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453818 08/21/2025 Eighth Avenue Enterprise
Llc
388.08 0 388.08
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453820 08/21/2025 Frontier Comm 0 223.88 223.88
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453836 08/21/2025 Southern California Edison 0 10,595.17 10,595.17
Supplier Payment: Solarwinds Inc:
08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453835 08/21/2025 Solarwinds Inc 24,457.00 0 24,457.00
Supplier Payment: Firefighters'
Safety Center Inc: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453819 08/21/2025 Firefighters' Safety Center
Inc
0 2,601.09 2,601.09
Supplier Payment: AED
Professionals: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453813 08/21/2025 AED Professionals 0 15,790.00 15,790.00
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453826 08/21/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 451.88 0 451.88
Supplier Payment: Adobe Animal
Hospital: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453812 08/21/2025 Adobe Animal Hospital 500.00 0 500.00
Supplier Payment: Stotz
Equipment: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453838 08/21/2025 Stotz Equipment 122.49 0 122.49
Supplier Payment: Safelite
Fulfillment Inc: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453830 08/21/2025 Safelite Fulfillment Inc 92.00 0 92.00
Supplier Payment: State Fire
Training: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
453837 08/21/2025 State Fire Training 0 125.00 125.00
Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc:
08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453841 08/21/2025 Boot Barn Inc 8,740.35 0 8,740.35
3,350,900.93 138,212.42 3,489,113.35
Page 20
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Melanie Morris, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers
for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total
Amount of $250.08 Dated August 11, 2025 Through August 24, 2025.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $21.39 and $228.69 for the City
and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 21
Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas 08:07 AM
08/26/2025
Page 1 of 1
Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Payment Date On or After: 08/11/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 08/24/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier
Name
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount
for Reporting
Transaction
Supplier Payment: Socal
Gas: 08/21/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
453834 08/21/2025 Socal Gas 21.39 0 21.39
Supplier Payment: Socal
Gas: 08/21/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
453833 08/21/2025 Socal Gas 0 228.69 228.69
21.39 228.69 250.08
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 22
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of
July 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive
and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of July 31, 2025.
BACKGROUND:
The attached investment schedules as of July 31, 2025, reflect cash and investments managed
by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with the
requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District’s adopted Investment Policies
as approved on June 26, 2025.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s and District’s Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to
the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days
following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers
have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council’s core value of providing and
nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of
the City’s investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the
various services the city provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Investment Schedules as of July 31, 2025 (City)
Attachment 2 – Investment Schedules as of July 31, 2025 (Fire)
Page 23
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Portfolio Holdings
PFM Managed Account
PFM Cash Balance
CAMP Pool
State Pool
Passbook/Checking Accounts
Total
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Summary
July 31, 2025
Cash Dividends
and Income
$ 1,311,922.09
$ 1,311,922.09
$
$
Closing
Market Value
397,664,079.58
1,512,380.07
107,096,596.55
792,293.19
10,619,096.49
517,684,445.88
1 Indicates a pooled cash account consisting of cash-on-hand funds for both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Cash-on-hand is pooled for normal operations and then allocated at year-end for the two
entities.
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy
adopted June 26, 2025. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The Investment
Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated expenditures.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents is provided under the City's official Investment
Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds .
. �?/� Jun Harrington, Treasurer
f l�/t.J
Date
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 24
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
July 31, 2025
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
https://www.pfmam.comOnline Access 1-717-232-2723Customer Service
Tiffany Tint, CFA
Institutional Relationship Manager
Meredith LaBuda Sullivan
Senior Portfolio Manager
Rachael Miller
Client Consultant
Page 25
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a
representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.
Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and
investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of
each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the
products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The
stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this
statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending
on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable
security has or is still able to be called.
Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share
(normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month
by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning
of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by
365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.
YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based
on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized
basis.
YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the
current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM
according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The
investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.
Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final
consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.
Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your
statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information
about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have
other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated
copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your
client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.
PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide
specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division
of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment
adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank")
and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does
not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a
written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would
like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service
Operations at the address below.
Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.
However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request
is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to
their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting
Service Operations at the address below.
Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our
investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in
pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets
and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the
official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that
clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank
statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.
Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile
due to a timing difference.
Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit
funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing
internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.
Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as
of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be
differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income
and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured
bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be
reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities
could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered
investment company or local government investment program is contained in the
appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.
Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the
amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date
until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities
(those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a
straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is
amortized using the constant yield basis.
Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational
purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine
the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such
information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the
accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or
other taxing authorities.
Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified
of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.
Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be
redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.
Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not
guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain
non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in
securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual
settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for
securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any
changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s
beginning values.
Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected
sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are
distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at
1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA
Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.
Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned,
plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and
losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any
premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may
be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent
the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings
on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on
the actual distribution date.
Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than
investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one
share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a
percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of
the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by
multiplying it by
Page 26
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
39,672,697.25 7.69 Asset-Backed Security
3,110,606.45 0.60 Federal Agency Bond / Note
81,870,281.28 15.86 Corporate Note
4,721,366.65 0.91 Bank Note
6,446,898.50 1.25 Certificate of Deposit
58,813,362.58 11.39 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
1,989,341.15 0.39 Municipal Bond / Note
6,683,778.49 1.29 Corporate Note
194,355,747.23 37.66 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
107,096,596.55 20.75 CAMP Pool
792,293.19 0.15 Local Agency Investment Fund
10,619,096.49 2.06 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$516,172,065.81 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 1,311,922.09 397,664,079.58
CAMP Pool 0.00 107,096,596.55
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 792,293.19
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 10,619,096.49
$1,311,922.09 $516,172,065.81 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
118,507,986.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,154,263.66
102,536,797.49
81,385,397.81
111,567,282.01
93,020,338.61
0.00
22.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.77
19.86
15.77
21.61
18.02
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $516,172,065.81
832
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
7.69%ABS
0.60%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
15.86%
Corporate Note
0.91%
Bank Note
1.25%
Cert of Deposit
11.39%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.39%
Muni Bond / Note
1.29%
Priv Placement
Bond37.66%
US TSY Bond / Note
20.75%
CAMP Pool
0.15%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
2.06%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1PFM Asset Management
Page 27
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$396,864,119.71
(884,807.10)
(9,507,025.06)
12,717,547.38
0.00
(1,525,755.35)
$397,664,079.58
1,193,822.68
(30,887.37)
148,986.78
$1,311,922.09
Total
396,180,446.55
2,610,822.22
9,569,922.44
884,807.10
1,130,925.30
(12,748,434.75)
(393,739,836.86)
(2,618,389.16)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $1,270,262.84
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
490,000.00
9,569,922.44
1,130,925.30
394,807.10
(12,748,434.75)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$1,512,380.07 Closing Cash Balance
Account Page 1PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 28
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 199,640,000.00 194,355,747.23 48.87
Municipal Bond / Note 1,970,000.00 1,989,341.15 0.50
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
58,413,228.49 58,813,362.58 14.79
Federal Agency Bond / Note 3,110,000.00 3,110,606.45 0.78
Corporate Note 88,895,000.00 88,554,059.77 22.27
Certificate of Deposit 6,400,000.00 6,446,898.50 1.62
Bank Note 4,675,000.00 4,721,366.65 1.19
Asset-Backed Security 39,515,646.32 39,672,697.25 9.98
Managed Account Sub-Total 402,618,874.80 397,664,079.58 100.00%
Accrued Interest 2,610,822.22
Total Portfolio 402,618,874.80 400,274,901.80
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
9.98%
ABS
1.19%
Bank Note
1.62%
Cert of Deposit
20.59%
Corporate Note
0.78%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
14.79%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.50%
Muni Bond / Note
1.68%
Priv Placement
Bond
48.87%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
0.00%
2.30%
25.78%
20.47%
28.06%
23.39%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1080
4.23%
4.16%
Account Page 2PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 29
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
4.83%
A
8.27%
A+
6.85%
A-
0.25%
A-1
0.26%
AA
65.21%
AA+
2.89%
AA-
6.96%
AAA
0.87%
BBB+
3.61%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
2,872,284.55 0.72 Adobe Inc
6,809,612.26 1.71 American Express Co
3,101,179.26 0.78 BA Credit Card Trust
3,601,302.60 0.91 Bank of America Corp
651,760.89 0.16 Bank of New York Mellon Corp
2,740,999.50 0.69 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
2,573,292.40 0.65 BlackRock Inc
1,837,411.50 0.46 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust
2,148,933.57 0.54 Caterpillar Inc
1,942,262.00 0.49 Charles Schwab Corp
1,123,979.63 0.28 Cintas Corp
1,651,777.92 0.42 Cisco Systems Inc
5,545,027.91 1.39 Citigroup Inc
1,152,602.22 0.29 Colgate-Palmolive Co
2,044,022.00 0.51 Comcast Corp
2,284,078.50 0.57 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA
3,113,063.40 0.78 Credit Agricole Group
190,158.08 0.05 Cummins Inc
2,745,963.60 0.69 Deere & Co
3,044,142.43 0.77 Depository Trust & Clearing Corp
3,110,606.45 0.78 Federal Home Loan Banks
55,585,081.71 13.98 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
3,228,280.87 0.81 Federal National Mortgage Association
2,831,915.52 0.71 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust
1,586,329.18 0.40 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv
2,280,208.50 0.57 Goldman Sachs Group Inc
3,333,835.10 0.84 Groupe BPCE
4,437,370.80 1.12 Hershey Co
1,955,912.00 0.49 Home Depot Inc
5,589,313.33 1.41 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust
2,744,070.80 0.69 Honda Motor Co Ltd
2,813,129.20 0.71 HSBC Holdings PLC
Account Page 3PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 30
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
1,256,270.13 0.32 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2,495,935.00 0.63 International Business Machines Corp
562,263.84 0.14 Johnson & Johnson
3,493,793.90 0.88 JPMorgan Chase & Co
2,128,973.70 0.54 Kubota Credit Owner Trust
897,500.03 0.23 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA
898,636.56 0.23 Mars Inc
1,569,220.48 0.39 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust
3,045,608.00 0.77 Merck & Co Inc
2,532,525.00 0.64 Meta Platforms Inc
4,031,955.34 1.01 Morgan Stanley
2,982,081.00 0.75 National Australia Bank Ltd
1,671,752.04 0.42 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi
622,470.28 0.16 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust
1,588,921.46 0.40 Northern Trust Corp
2,447,652.50 0.62 PNC Financial Services Group Inc
1,091,841.12 0.27 State of Connecticut
614,436.79 0.15 State Street Corp
2,234,772.00 0.56 Texas Instruments Inc
1,485,003.45 0.37 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
3,385,662.32 0.85 Toyota Motor Corp
3,745,867.80 0.94 Truist Financial Corp
194,355,747.23 48.86 United States Treasury
1,780,005.60 0.45 UnitedHealth Group Inc
2,791,512.18 0.70 Verizon Master Trust
2,346,849.18 0.59 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust
1,024,524.72 0.26 Walmart Inc
4,721,366.65 1.19 Wells Fargo & Co
5,031,844.72 1.27 WF Card Issuance Trust
159,178.88 0.04 World Omni Auto Trust
$397,664,079.58 Total 100.00%
Account Page 4PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 31
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
1,243,760.64 1,267,988.49 1,626.23 1,218,000.00 02/17/2202/16/22Aa1AA+ 1,280,000.00 91282CCF6 1.93
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
965,461.00 998,599.25 16.98 993,007.82 08/09/2108/06/21Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.77
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
2,896,383.00 2,903,044.00 50.95 2,818,359.38 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4 3.96
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2016 1.500% 08/15/2026
4,403,390.63 4,458,646.39 31,312.50 4,249,081.05 04/22/2204/21/22Aa1AA+ 4,525,000.00 9128282A7 3.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
963,125.00 963,998.99 2,940.57 878,867.19 10/31/2210/28/22Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCZ2 4.27
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
3,756,187.50 3,776,048.43 11,468.24 3,542,144.53 05/22/2305/18/23Aa1AA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CCZ2 3.81
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
385,515.60 399,389.17 1,137.23 397,578.13 11/18/2111/17/21Aa1AA+ 400,000.00 91282CDG3 1.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
1,927,578.00 1,926,554.21 5,686.14 1,884,687.50 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CDG3 4.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
2,891,367.00 2,940,862.94 8,529.21 2,789,648.44 05/23/2205/20/22Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CDG3 2.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
2,920,782.00 2,962,317.28 12,717.39 2,870,390.63 06/09/2206/08/22Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 912828U24 3.05
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
3,894,376.00 3,895,153.33 16,956.52 3,836,250.00 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 912828U24 4.11
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
1,349,031.60 1,346,748.13 2,964.48 1,318,734.38 11/08/2411/07/24Aa1AA+ 1,400,000.00 91282CDK4 4.22
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
2,789,604.63 2,897,200.80 6,130.12 2,903,255.27 12/03/2112/01/21Aa1AA+ 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4 1.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2021 1.250% 12/31/2026
1,562,411.50 1,622,639.17 1,766.30 1,616,684.57 01/05/2201/03/22Aa1AA+ 1,625,000.00 91282CDQ1 1.36
Account Page 5PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 32
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2026
3,408,901.76 3,386,315.83 5,356.52 3,223,412.50 11/10/2311/08/23Aa1AA+ 3,520,000.00 912828YX2 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2020 1.500% 01/31/2027
2,070,970.30 2,071,653.50 87.64 1,989,589.84 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,150,000.00 912828Z78 4.11
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
627,942.98 638,565.07 6,694.99 625,398.05 06/06/2206/02/22Aa1AA+ 645,000.00 912828V98 2.95
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
1,898,432.25 1,936,800.70 20,240.68 1,911,152.34 08/03/2208/01/22Aa1AA+ 1,950,000.00 912828V98 2.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3,310,087.00 3,371,138.52 35,291.44 3,313,671.88 07/07/2207/05/22Aa1AA+ 3,400,000.00 912828V98 2.84
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
2,725,201.35 2,723,213.56 13,417.46 2,647,271.48 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,850,000.00 912828ZB9 4.06
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
4,302,949.50 4,277,632.98 21,185.46 4,010,097.66 09/08/2309/05/23Aa1AA+ 4,500,000.00 912828ZB9 4.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
2,207,992.60 2,199,266.61 35,316.58 2,199,054.69 02/05/2502/04/25Aa1AA+ 2,200,000.00 91282CKE0 4.27
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3,208,735.20 3,254,346.71 16,612.09 3,179,214.84 08/24/2208/22/22Aa1AA+ 3,300,000.00 912828X88 3.22
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
1,563,249.60 1,565,889.62 119.57 1,522,000.00 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 1,600,000.00 91282CFB2 3.93
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
1,095,044.78 1,098,308.63 2,458.56 1,066,771.48 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 1,175,000.00 91282CAH4 3.79
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
1,118,343.60 1,124,774.84 2,510.87 1,093,781.25 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,200,000.00 91282CAH4 3.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3,012,189.00 3,039,890.45 41,588.11 3,081,093.75 05/08/2305/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CFM8 3.46
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
973,382.55 968,046.70 1,326.77 945,492.19 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 1,050,000.00 91282CAU5 4.18
Account Page 6PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 33
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
803,344.00 795,994.81 6,994.57 795,031.25 12/31/2412/26/24Aa1AA+ 800,000.00 91282CLX7 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3,083,500.80 3,110,966.00 15,260.87 3,013,625.00 01/30/2301/25/23Aa1AA+ 3,200,000.00 9128283F5 3.58
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
2,497,657.50 2,479,776.66 8,423.91 2,459,667.97 03/08/2303/06/23Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9 4.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
2,497,657.50 2,462,623.87 8,423.91 2,446,093.75 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9 4.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
2,868,712.10 2,827,212.57 63.18 2,637,785.16 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,100,000.00 91282CBJ9 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
4,505,924.15 4,494,345.36 432.74 4,459,355.47 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 4,550,000.00 91282CGH8 4.04
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
1,944,062.00 1,932,801.94 25,372.93 1,869,296.88 03/08/2303/06/23Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 9128283W8 4.23
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
2,916,093.00 2,958,728.89 38,059.39 2,921,015.63 04/06/2304/05/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 9128283W8 3.34
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3,280,604.63 3,233,417.34 42,816.82 3,137,299.80 11/10/2311/09/23Aa1AA+ 3,375,000.00 9128283W8 4.59
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
1,586,776.60 1,577,873.80 7,141.39 1,482,984.38 07/07/2307/05/23Aa1AA+ 1,700,000.00 91282CBS9 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
2,450,169.75 2,406,721.59 11,027.15 2,257,089.84 10/04/2310/02/23Aa1AA+ 2,625,000.00 91282CBS9 4.75
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
2,929,833.80 2,920,997.63 35,938.01 2,916,812.50 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 2,950,000.00 91282CGT2 4.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3,633,247.80 3,655,655.26 12,319.97 3,463,687.50 06/05/2306/01/23Aa1AA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CBZ3 3.77
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 1.250% 05/31/2028
302,135.60 299,532.53 688.18 281,010.74 07/11/2307/07/23Aa1AA+ 325,000.00 91282CCE9 4.35
Account Page 7PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 34
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3,131,500.50 3,076,526.54 3,668.48 2,898,676.76 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,375,000.00 91282CCH2 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
6,127,734.00 6,063,192.18 93,258.20 6,093,046.88 12/05/2312/04/23Aa1AA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CJA0 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
7,204,533.00 7,104,973.09 86,239.81 7,143,828.13 04/03/2404/01/24Aa1AA+ 7,000,000.00 91282CJF9 4.37
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
7,808,752.00 7,734,762.75 52,989.13 7,621,562.50 03/06/2403/04/24Aa1AA+ 8,000,000.00 9128285M8 4.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
4,775,251.20 4,691,904.94 15,652.17 4,660,875.00 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,800,000.00 91282CJR3 4.47
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
1,953,327.60 1,918,432.02 99.86 1,864,324.22 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,100,000.00 91282CDW8 4.45
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
4,185,702.00 4,205,581.46 213.99 4,080,585.94 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,500,000.00 91282CDW8 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
5,485,042.35 5,356,196.67 69,328.64 5,240,611.33 05/06/2405/02/24Aa1AA+ 5,725,000.00 9128286B1 4.62
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
5,970,724.20 5,865,366.75 50,283.81 5,742,105.47 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 6,300,000.00 91282CEE7 4.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
2,651,063.25 2,655,103.08 19,980.47 2,632,050.78 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,750,000.00 91282CEM9 3.87
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3,856,092.00 3,860,830.84 29,062.50 3,827,031.25 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 91282CEM9 3.88
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
2,146,718.20 2,159,492.02 6,217.39 2,150,929.69 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,200,000.00 91282CEV9 3.76
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
4,878,905.00 4,931,352.21 14,130.43 4,916,796.88 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CEV9 3.63
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
952,461.00 944,453.77 71.33 935,156.25 11/05/2411/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CFC0 4.15
Account Page 8PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 35
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
1,047,707.10 1,063,938.83 78.46 1,057,074.22 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,100,000.00 91282CFC0 3.51
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3,238,367.40 3,237,947.70 242.53 3,231,992.19 06/04/2505/30/25Aa1AA+ 3,400,000.00 91282CFC0 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
1,097,680.10 1,086,889.07 14,324.80 1,084,789.06 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,100,000.00 91282CFL0 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
1,995,782.00 1,981,060.97 26,045.08 1,977,968.75 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CFL0 4.12
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.000% 10/31/2029
2,731,706.23 2,710,064.16 27,546.20 2,707,968.75 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 2,725,000.00 91282CFT3 4.14
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
2,034,454.00 2,004,129.27 7,608.70 2,004,531.25 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CMD0 4.32
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
2,543,067.50 2,501,579.96 9,510.87 2,501,757.81 01/07/2501/02/25Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CMD0 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
6,381,173.50 6,348,974.16 618.21 6,336,484.38 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 6,500,000.00 91282CGJ4 4.07
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
2,267,475.70 2,247,063.99 28,019.47 2,244,027.34 04/15/2504/11/25Aa1AA+ 2,300,000.00 91282CGS4 4.17
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
4,208,530.20 4,213,730.28 56,459.02 4,214,601.56 04/02/2504/01/25Aa1AA+ 4,200,000.00 91282CMU2 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
2,650,026.20 2,667,279.89 16,992.83 2,667,163.09 07/03/2507/01/25Aa1AA+ 2,675,000.00 91282CHF1 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
4,259,855.20 4,243,184.44 27,315.57 4,241,714.84 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 4,300,000.00 91282CHF1 4.05
1,174,430.57 194,355,747.23 194,045,693.59 3.93 190,343,101.03 199,640,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
897,500.03 890,000.00 8,529.02 890,000.00 05/13/2504/24/25Aa2NR 890,000.00 544647KY5 4.42
Account Page 9PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 36
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Municipal Bond / Note
CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
1,091,841.12 1,080,000.00 11,312.28 1,080,000.00 05/07/2504/23/25Aa3AA- 1,080,000.00 20772KZK8 4.49
19,841.30 1,989,341.15 1,970,000.00 4.46 1,970,000.00 1,970,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
1,686,502.89 1,674,179.55 4,863.53 1,624,500.00 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 1,710,000.00 3137BUX60 5.03
FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
1,918,953.68 1,897,209.97 5,216.87 1,835,739.06 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 1,960,000.00 3137FAWS3 4.97
FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3,186,647.10 3,151,602.12 12,649.88 3,152,707.03 08/01/2307/27/23Aa1AA+ 3,150,000.00 3137HACX2 4.80
FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3,171,150.67 3,161,061.16 12,583.84 3,161,028.81 07/27/2307/19/23Aa1AA+ 3,161,107.83 3137HAD45 4.78
FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3,228,280.87 3,173,820.93 11,337.86 3,126,114.68 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 3,247,120.66 3136BQDE6 5.04
FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3,032,295.00 2,956,389.05 11,850.00 2,934,192.00 10/19/2310/11/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 3137HAQ74 5.25
FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3,506,125.58 3,441,595.14 13,465.63 3,423,594.33 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 3,475,000.00 3137HAMH6 4.99
FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
2,364,486.33 2,279,099.29 9,417.08 2,255,712.61 10/31/2310/25/23Aa1AA+ 2,330,000.00 3137HAST4 5.60
FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3,037,821.00 2,939,389.23 12,000.00 2,909,648.43 10/20/2310/17/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 3137HAMS2 5.50
FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
1,153,001.15 1,127,761.87 4,773.31 1,126,733.17 11/21/2311/14/23Aa1AA+ 1,130,000.00 3137HB3D4 5.14
FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
1,745,044.92 1,716,592.06 6,966.00 1,715,058.44 12/07/2311/28/23Aa1AA+ 1,720,000.00 3137HB3G7 4.93
Account Page 10PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 37
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
1,801,524.02 1,802,885.69 6,819.90 1,807,898.21 02/08/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,790,000.00 3137HBLV4 4.34
FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
4,106,852.00 4,030,387.98 17,266.67 4,038,281.25 07/05/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 3137HCKV3 4.95
FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
1,312,304.09 1,326,721.76 4,902.45 1,331,073.90 09/12/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,305,000.00 3137HFNZ4 4.06
FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
2,675,100.80 2,688,217.23 10,198.08 2,696,306.10 08/22/2408/13/24Aa1AA+ 2,650,000.00 3137HFF59 4.23
FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3,367,843.01 3,370,742.94 12,663.61 3,376,289.13 08/15/2408/07/24Aa1AA+ 3,345,000.00 3137HDXL9 4.33
FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
2,392,025.31 2,395,218.10 9,402.34 2,402,069.39 10/16/2410/08/24Aa1AA+ 2,355,000.00 3137HH6C0 4.34
FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3,788,997.41 3,747,228.12 14,895.13 3,749,422.11 11/27/2411/19/24Aa1AA+ 3,730,000.00 3137HHJL6 4.67
FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
1,327,191.55 1,324,956.81 4,869.38 1,324,953.63 04/24/2504/15/25Aa1AA+ 1,325,000.00 3137HKXJ8 4.41
FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
2,090,062.38 2,084,982.73 7,697.13 2,084,977.07 03/20/2503/11/25Aa1AA+ 2,085,000.00 3137HKPF5 4.43
FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3,918,877.00 3,924,930.58 14,159.44 3,924,925.42 07/17/2507/09/25Aa1AA+ 3,925,000.00 3137HMC65 4.33
FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4,002,275.82 4,015,701.33 14,291.10 4,015,762.92 07/31/2507/22/25Aa1AA+ 4,020,000.00 3137HMCE8 4.29
222,289.23 58,813,362.58 58,230,673.64 4.75 58,016,987.69 58,413,228.49 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3,110,606.45 3,106,137.84 16,068.33 3,105,863.70 06/13/2506/12/25Aa1AA+ 3,110,000.00 3130B6R24 3.95
16,068.33 3,110,606.45 3,106,137.84 3.95 3,105,863.70 3,110,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Account Page 11PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 38
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
1,073,976.02 1,104,546.57 1,484.84 1,102,546.90 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
987,429.00 1,013,019.91 347.22 1,062,320.00 11/03/2111/01/21A1A- 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8 1.75
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
987,429.00 979,377.89 347.22 936,280.00 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8 5.41
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
1,929,366.00 1,993,213.59 10,255.56 1,970,740.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 09/14/2021 1.150% 09/14/2026
1,933,054.00 1,992,422.38 8,752.78 1,967,640.00 12/03/2112/01/21A2A 2,000,000.00 14913R2Q9 1.50
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026
984,600.00 1,013,669.00 9,833.33 1,057,540.00 11/03/2111/01/21A1A 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4 1.72
CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2016 3.200% 10/21/2026
1,181,521.20 1,171,187.07 10,666.67 1,124,628.00 08/10/2308/07/23A3BBB+ 1,200,000.00 172967KY6 5.36
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
780,107.79 769,880.68 9,342.67 769,730.50 11/02/2310/30/23A2A- 770,000.00 63743HFK3 5.61
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
1,928,146.00 1,996,737.71 1,888.89 1,988,720.00 01/13/2201/11/22A1A 2,000,000.00 24422EWA3 1.82
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
2,005,990.00 1,986,876.81 3,104.44 1,968,420.00 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 2,000,000.00 06051GLE7 5.58
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
2,280,208.50 2,275,787.44 1,229.86 2,228,539.00 09/07/2209/02/22A2BBB+ 2,300,000.00 38141GWB6 4.64
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
2,056,215.00 2,051,657.48 11,012.34 1,949,808.00 03/28/2203/24/22Baa1A- 2,100,000.00 89788MAD4 2.83
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
1,942,262.00 1,966,611.47 20,144.44 1,898,200.00 04/29/2204/27/22A2A- 2,000,000.00 808513BY0 3.60
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/28/2022 2.875% 04/15/2027
1,955,912.00 1,977,896.00 16,930.56 1,936,100.00 05/10/2205/06/22A2A 2,000,000.00 437076CN0 3.59
Account Page 12PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 39
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.593% 05/04/2027
488,690.50 483,071.56 1,924.88 452,825.00 06/10/2206/08/22A1A- 500,000.00 61772BAB9 3.72
NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
1,588,921.46 1,600,307.29 14,355.00 1,610,407.70 05/12/2205/10/22A2A+ 1,595,000.00 665859AW4 3.79
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
395,556.80 399,922.50 3,124.44 399,784.00 05/20/2205/17/22A2A+ 400,000.00 91324PEG3 3.71
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
1,384,448.80 1,404,384.01 10,935.56 1,412,488.00 06/06/2206/02/22A2A+ 1,400,000.00 91324PEG3 3.50
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
2,447,652.50 2,485,503.78 15,750.00 2,461,500.00 08/08/2208/04/22A3A- 2,500,000.00 693475AT2 3.50
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
2,982,081.00 2,990,325.90 16,921.67 2,973,990.00 06/13/2206/09/22Aa2AA- 3,000,000.00 63254ABE7 4.10
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.734% 07/22/2027
1,069,699.40 1,043,075.00 476.85 986,150.00 08/10/2308/07/23A1A- 1,100,000.00 06051GJS9 4.63
IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/27/2022 4.150% 07/27/2027
2,495,935.00 2,523,743.61 1,152.78 2,561,055.00 08/03/2208/01/22A3A- 2,500,000.00 459200KT7 3.61
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
281,608.80 284,044.17 1,668.75 260,685.00 08/24/2208/22/22Baa1A- 300,000.00 89788MAC6 4.08
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
1,408,044.00 1,384,570.67 8,343.75 1,226,295.00 10/31/2210/27/22Baa1A- 1,500,000.00 89788MAC6 5.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
2,311,686.30 2,289,421.51 38,080.97 2,275,459.00 10/06/2210/04/22A1A+ 2,300,000.00 89236TKJ3 4.79
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
2,234,772.00 2,234,972.79 16,304.44 2,158,734.00 12/09/2212/07/22Aa3A+ 2,300,000.00 882508BC7 4.30
COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
2,044,022.00 2,040,060.70 22,588.89 2,085,520.00 01/30/2301/25/23A3A- 2,000,000.00 20030NEA5 4.35
JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
562,263.84 554,723.13 11,293.48 554,678.10 02/20/2502/18/25AaaAAA 555,000.00 478160DH4 4.57
Account Page 13PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 40
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
1,568,406.84 1,544,843.31 26,112.24 1,548,100.40 05/06/2405/02/24A1A- 1,540,000.00 61747YFP5 5.50
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
1,093,915.70 1,076,881.56 16,469.27 1,078,128.25 05/06/2405/02/24A1A 1,075,000.00 46647PEE2 5.49
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
1,123,979.63 1,123,673.55 11,681.25 1,123,560.00 05/02/2504/28/25A3A- 1,125,000.00 17252MAR1 4.25
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
2,407,972.80 2,413,021.77 24,650.00 2,423,880.00 05/08/2305/04/23A1A 2,400,000.00 427866BH0 4.03
CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
190,158.08 189,876.62 1,839.31 189,867.00 05/09/2505/06/25A2A 190,000.00 231021AY2 4.28
META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
2,532,525.00 2,502,622.81 24,277.78 2,504,650.00 06/05/2306/01/23Aa3AA- 2,500,000.00 30303M8L9 4.56
MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
3,045,608.00 3,037,572.95 25,391.25 3,027,826.50 05/22/2305/18/23Aa3A+ 3,050,000.00 58933YBH7 4.21
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
582,719.62 579,742.29 4,345.17 579,727.40 06/03/2505/27/25A2A- 580,000.00 40428HR95 4.67
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
2,230,409.58 2,220,169.32 16,631.50 2,220,177.60 06/03/2505/28/25A2A- 2,220,000.00 40428HR95 4.65
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
814,704.80 797,873.89 2,733.33 796,384.00 07/11/2307/07/23A3A- 800,000.00 02665WEM9 5.23
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
817,817.60 803,211.77 1,870.00 805,360.00 08/10/2308/07/23A1A 800,000.00 24422EXB0 4.79
BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
2,740,999.50 2,681,528.33 64,387.50 2,669,598.00 08/17/2308/14/23A2A 2,700,000.00 05565ECE3 5.31
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
3,540,926.60 3,388,755.91 66,863.46 3,383,136.00 10/04/2310/02/23Aa3A+ 3,400,000.00 17325FBB3 5.92
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
2,284,078.50 2,252,251.53 6,600.00 2,253,150.00 01/12/2401/10/24Aa2A+ 2,250,000.00 21688ABC5 4.77
Account Page 14PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 41
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
1,415,278.20 1,400,000.00 1,337.97 1,400,000.00 01/24/2501/16/25A1A 1,400,000.00 46647PEU6 4.92
CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
1,651,777.92 1,619,585.27 33,828.75 1,619,433.00 02/26/2402/21/24A1AA- 1,620,000.00 17275RBR2 4.86
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2025 4.729% 04/20/2029
651,760.89 645,000.00 8,388.06 645,000.00 04/22/2504/14/25Aa2AA- 645,000.00 06405LAH4 4.73
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
215,879.57 214,519.63 4,311.20 214,417.35 08/16/2408/12/24A2A 215,000.00 14913UAQ3 4.44
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
2,872,284.55 2,791,141.40 5,380.38 2,790,723.65 01/17/2501/14/25A1A+ 2,795,000.00 00724PAJ8 4.98
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
891,644.25 873,778.54 20,934.38 873,661.25 02/07/2502/04/25A2NR 875,000.00 63743HFX5 4.98
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
2,029,398.00 2,005,656.37 41,430.56 2,006,140.00 02/25/2502/24/25A1A 2,000,000.00 427866BL1 4.68
MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
898,636.56 889,105.79 16,494.67 889,038.80 03/12/2503/05/25A2A 890,000.00 571676AY1 4.83
STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
614,436.79 605,000.00 7,880.09 605,000.00 04/24/2504/22/25Aa3A 605,000.00 857477DB6 4.83
WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
1,024,524.72 1,018,318.44 11,462.25 1,018,235.40 04/28/2504/23/25Aa2AA 1,020,000.00 931142FN8 4.39
BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
2,573,292.40 2,572,313.41 16,986.67 2,568,216.00 06/27/2506/26/25Aa3AA- 2,800,000.00 09247XAQ4 4.31
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
1,152,602.22 1,154,418.92 11,992.75 1,154,387.85 05/02/2504/28/25Aa3A+ 1,155,000.00 194162AT0 4.21
NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
3,044,142.43 3,008,208.06 27,901.03 3,008,133.80 05/20/2505/13/25Aa1AA+ 3,010,000.00 637639AQ8 4.71
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
822,580.11 810,000.00 6,855.03 810,000.00 05/29/2505/21/25Aa3A+ 810,000.00 17325FBP2 4.91
Account Page 15PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 42
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
777,298.13 88,554,059.77 88,230,082.06 4.26 87,586,715.45 88,895,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit
NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 02/18/2025 4.510% 02/13/2026
999,825.00 1,000,000.00 20,545.56 1,000,000.00 02/18/2502/14/25P-1A-1 1,000,000.00 63873TBC1 4.51
NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
2,334,010.10 2,300,000.00 113,618.08 2,300,000.00 09/20/2309/18/23A1A+ 2,300,000.00 63873QP65 5.61
CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
3,113,063.40 3,100,000.00 72,550.33 3,100,000.00 02/05/2402/01/24A1A+ 3,100,000.00 22536DWD6 4.76
206,713.97 6,446,898.50 6,400,000.00 5.03 6,400,000.00 6,400,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Bank Note
WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
4,721,366.65 4,674,047.65 123,147.29 4,672,195.00 08/09/2308/03/23Aa2A+ 4,675,000.00 94988J6D4 5.47
123,147.29 4,721,366.65 4,674,047.65 5.47 4,672,195.00 4,675,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
39,733.16 39,775.20 39.25 39,774.07 03/16/2203/09/22NRAAA 39,775.60 448977AD0 2.22
HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
1,455,182.33 1,453,804.91 1,974.85 1,453,762.91 08/21/2408/09/24AaaNR 1,453,876.75 43813YAB8 4.89
WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
159,178.88 159,148.25 357.21 159,142.54 02/14/2402/06/24NRAAA 159,155.00 98164RAB2 5.05
NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
622,470.28 617,761.12 1,628.35 617,713.54 10/25/2310/18/23AaaNR 617,838.96 65480MAD5 5.94
HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
398,554.61 394,954.84 622.13 394,930.44 11/08/2311/01/23AaaNR 395,000.00 438123AC5 5.67
KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
2,128,973.70 2,121,563.32 4,909.33 2,124,363.28 02/12/2502/11/25AaaNR 2,100,000.00 50117DAC0 4.92
Account Page 16PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 43
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
1,485,003.45 1,475,000.00 3,199.11 1,474,999.12 07/30/2407/23/24NRAAA 1,475,000.00 89237QAD2 4.88
HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
1,216,536.97 1,214,928.05 2,381.40 1,214,911.06 10/16/2410/08/24NRAAA 1,215,000.00 448976AD2 4.41
HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
3,001,845.00 2,988,917.91 5,773.33 2,987,578.13 01/31/2501/30/25AaaAAA 3,000,000.00 43816DAC9 4.44
BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
3,101,179.26 3,064,873.12 6,715.76 3,064,828.05 06/13/2406/06/24AaaAAA 3,065,000.00 05522RDJ4 4.93
AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
2,110,838.20 2,094,924.44 4,329.67 2,094,904.89 07/23/2407/16/24NRAAA 2,095,000.00 02589BAE0 4.65
GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
976,080.30 974,841.43 1,787.50 974,812.22 10/16/2410/08/24AaaAAA 975,000.00 38014AAD3 4.40
VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
2,346,849.18 2,339,930.77 3,217.50 2,339,920.44 03/25/2503/18/25AaaNR 2,340,000.00 92868MAD1 4.50
BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
1,837,411.50 1,829,841.14 1,390.80 1,829,819.75 02/12/2502/04/25AaaAAA 1,830,000.00 096924AD7 4.56
HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
733,731.39 734,923.54 1,355.67 734,917.90 05/08/2504/29/25AaaNR 735,000.00 437921AD1 4.15
WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
1,752,898.00 1,749,778.16 3,336.67 1,749,739.95 10/24/2410/17/24AaaAAA 1,750,000.00 92970QAE5 4.29
FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
2,831,915.52 2,834,750.34 5,607.00 2,834,724.44 03/25/2503/18/25AaaAAA 2,835,000.00 34535KAD0 4.45
BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
525,613.20 524,967.09 697.81 524,963.78 05/12/2505/06/25AaaNR 525,000.00 05594BAD8 4.35
MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
1,569,220.48 1,554,705.73 3,303.51 1,554,669.25 01/23/2501/14/25AaaNR 1,555,000.00 58773DAD6 4.78
VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
2,791,512.18 2,789,895.13 3,844.78 2,789,880.03 03/31/2503/25/25AaaNR 2,790,000.00 92348KDY6 4.51
Account Page 17PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 44
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
2,581,998.85 2,574,956.17 4,898.22 2,574,953.39 05/13/2505/06/25NRAAA 2,575,000.00 02582JKP4 4.28
GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
610,248.88 609,914.31 1,087.83 609,910.21 05/14/2505/06/25AaaAAA 610,000.00 362549AD9 4.28
WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
3,278,946.72 3,269,957.65 6,307.47 3,269,945.72 06/10/2506/03/25NRAAA 3,270,000.00 92970QAJ4 4.34
AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
2,116,775.21 2,109,699.15 2,268.25 2,109,695.95 07/22/2507/15/25NRAAA 2,110,000.00 02582JKV1 4.30
71,033.40 39,672,697.25 39,523,811.77 4.57 39,524,861.06 39,515,646.32 Security Type Sub-Total
402,618,874.80 391,619,723.93 4.23 2,610,822.22 396,180,446.55 397,664,079.58 Managed Account Sub-Total
$402,618,874.80 $391,619,723.93 $2,610,822.22 $396,180,446.55 $397,664,079.58 4.23%
$400,274,901.80
$2,610,822.22
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account Page 18PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 45
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(24,227.85) 25,760.64 1,243,760.64 97.17 JPMorgan 1,280,000.00 91282CCF6US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
4.18 0.81
(33,138.25)(27,546.82) 965,461.00 96.55 Citigrou 1,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
4.13 0.98
(6,661.00) 78,023.62 2,896,383.00 96.55 Citigrou 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
4.13 0.98
(55,255.76) 154,309.58 4,403,390.63 97.31 BOFAML 4,525,000.00 9128282A7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2016 1.500% 08/15/2026
4.15 1.01
(873.99) 84,257.81 963,125.00 96.31 Citigrou 1,000,000.00 91282CCZ2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
4.12 1.14
(19,860.93) 214,042.97 3,756,187.50 96.31 BMO 3,900,000.00 91282CCZ2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
4.12 1.14
(13,873.57)(12,062.53) 385,515.60 96.38 Citigrou 400,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
1,023.79 42,890.50 1,927,578.00 96.38 WellsFar 2,000,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
(49,495.94) 101,718.56 2,891,367.00 96.38 BMO 3,000,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
(41,535.28) 50,391.37 2,920,782.00 97.36 BOFAML 3,000,000.00 912828U24US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
4.09 1.25
(777.33) 58,126.00 3,894,376.00 97.36 Citigrou 4,000,000.00 912828U24US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
4.09 1.25
2,283.47 30,297.22 1,349,031.60 96.36 Citigrou 1,400,000.00 91282CDK4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
4.06 1.30
(107,596.17)(113,650.64) 2,789,604.63 96.36 Nomura 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
4.06 1.30
(60,227.67)(54,273.07) 1,562,411.50 96.15 JPMorgan 1,625,000.00 91282CDQ1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2021 1.250% 12/31/2026
4.04 1.38
22,585.93 185,489.26 3,408,901.76 96.84 BMO 3,520,000.00 912828YX2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2026
4.05 1.37
(683.20) 81,380.46 2,070,970.30 96.32 BOFAML 2,150,000.00 912828Z78US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2020 1.500% 01/31/2027
4.04 1.46
(10,622.09) 2,544.93 627,942.98 97.36 BOFAML 645,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
4.02 1.47
Account Page 19PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 46
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(38,368.45)(12,720.09) 1,898,432.25 97.36 BOFAML 1,950,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
4.02 1.47
(61,051.52)(3,584.88) 3,310,087.00 97.36 Citigrou 3,400,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
4.02 1.47
1,987.79 77,929.87 2,725,201.35 95.62 MorganSt 2,850,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
4.00 1.53
25,316.52 292,851.84 4,302,949.50 95.62 BMO 4,500,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
4.00 1.53
8,725.99 8,937.91 2,207,992.60 100.36 WellsFar 2,200,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.99 1.52
(45,611.51) 29,520.36 3,208,735.20 97.23 BOFAML 3,300,000.00 912828X88US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3.97 1.71
(2,640.02) 41,249.60 1,563,249.60 97.70 BMO 1,600,000.00 91282CFB2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
3.95 1.92
(3,263.85) 28,273.30 1,095,044.78 93.20 BOFAML 1,175,000.00 91282CAH4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
3.93 2.03
(6,431.24) 24,562.35 1,118,343.60 93.20 BOFAML 1,200,000.00 91282CAH4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
3.93 2.03
(27,701.45)(68,904.75) 3,012,189.00 100.41 Citigrou 3,000,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3.92 2.02
5,335.85 27,890.36 973,382.55 92.70 Citigrou 1,050,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.92 2.19
7,349.19 8,312.75 803,344.00 100.42 WellsFar 800,000.00 91282CLX7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
3.92 2.15
(27,465.20) 69,875.80 3,083,500.80 96.36 Citigrou 3,200,000.00 9128283F5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3.92 2.19
17,880.84 37,989.53 2,497,657.50 99.91 BMO 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
3.91 2.27
35,033.63 51,563.75 2,497,657.50 99.91 BMO 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
3.91 2.27
41,499.53 230,926.94 2,868,712.10 92.54 BMO 3,100,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
3.91 2.43
11,578.79 46,568.68 4,505,924.15 99.03 WellsFar 4,550,000.00 91282CGH8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
3.91 2.37
Account Page 20PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 47
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
11,260.06 74,765.12 1,944,062.00 97.20 BMO 2,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.91 2.39
(42,635.89)(4,922.63) 2,916,093.00 97.20 BMO 3,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.91 2.39
47,187.29 143,304.83 3,280,604.63 97.20 BMO 3,375,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.91 2.39
8,902.80 103,792.22 1,586,776.60 93.34 JPMorgan 1,700,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.90 2.56
43,448.16 193,079.91 2,450,169.75 93.34 BOFAML 2,625,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.90 2.56
8,836.17 13,021.30 2,929,833.80 99.32 WellsFar 2,950,000.00 91282CGT2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
3.89 2.48
(22,407.46) 169,560.30 3,633,247.80 93.16 BMO 3,900,000.00 91282CBZ3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3.89 2.64
2,603.07 21,124.86 302,135.60 92.96 RBC Capi 325,000.00 91282CCE9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 1.250% 05/31/2028
3.89 2.73
54,973.96 232,823.74 3,131,500.50 92.79 BMO 3,375,000.00 91282CCH2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3.89 2.81
64,541.82 34,687.12 6,127,734.00 102.13 BOFAML 6,000,000.00 91282CJA0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
3.90 2.88
99,559.91 60,704.87 7,204,533.00 102.92 BMO 7,000,000.00 91282CJF9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
3.90 2.95
73,989.25 187,189.50 7,808,752.00 97.61 BMO 8,000,000.00 9128285M8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
3.90 3.07
83,346.26 114,376.20 4,775,251.20 99.48 BOFAML 4,800,000.00 91282CJR3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
3.90 3.16
34,895.58 89,003.38 1,953,327.60 93.02 BMO 2,100,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.90 3.34
(19,879.46) 105,116.06 4,185,702.00 93.02 Nomura 4,500,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.90 3.34
128,845.68 244,431.02 5,485,042.35 95.81 BOFAML 5,725,000.00 9128286B1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
3.90 3.29
105,357.45 228,618.73 5,970,724.20 94.77 Citigrou 6,300,000.00 91282CEE7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
3.91 3.43
Account Page 21PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 48
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(4,039.83) 19,012.47 2,651,063.25 96.40 Citigrou 2,750,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.91 3.48
(4,738.84) 29,060.75 3,856,092.00 96.40 BOFAML 4,000,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.91 3.48
(12,773.82)(4,211.49) 2,146,718.20 97.58 BOFAML 2,200,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.92 3.62
(52,447.21)(37,891.88) 4,878,905.00 97.58 Nomura 5,000,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.92 3.62
8,007.23 17,304.75 952,461.00 95.25 BMO 1,000,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.92 3.74
(16,231.73)(9,367.12) 1,047,707.10 95.25 Nomura 1,100,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.92 3.74
419.70 6,375.21 3,238,367.40 95.25 WellsFar 3,400,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.92 3.74
10,791.03 12,891.04 1,097,680.10 99.79 BOFAML 1,100,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.93 3.76
14,721.03 17,813.25 1,995,782.00 99.79 BMO 2,000,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.93 3.76
21,642.07 23,737.48 2,731,706.23 100.25 WellsFar 2,725,000.00 91282CFT3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.000% 10/31/2029
3.94 3.84
30,324.73 29,922.75 2,034,454.00 101.72 Nomura 2,000,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.94 3.97
41,487.54 41,309.69 2,543,067.50 101.72 MorganSt 2,500,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.94 3.97
32,199.34 44,689.12 6,381,173.50 98.17 Citigrou 6,500,000.00 91282CGJ4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
3.95 4.12
20,411.71 23,448.36 2,267,475.70 98.59 WellsFar 2,300,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.96 4.20
(5,200.08)(6,071.36) 4,208,530.20 100.20 Nomura 4,200,000.00 91282CMU2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
3.95 4.16
(17,253.69)(17,136.89) 2,650,026.20 99.07 Citigrou 2,675,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.97 4.35
16,670.76 18,140.36 4,259,855.20 99.07 BMO 4,300,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.97 4.35
Account Page 22PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 49
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
4,012,646.20 3.96 310,053.64 194,355,747.23 199,640,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.63
Municipal Bond / Note
7,500.03 7,500.03 897,500.03 100.84 RaymondJ 890,000.00 544647KY5LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
4.12 2.69
11,841.12 11,841.12 1,091,841.12 101.10 Barclays 1,080,000.00 20772KZK8CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
4.17 3.28
19,341.15 4.15 19,341.15 1,989,341.15 1,970,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.01
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
12,323.34 62,002.89 1,686,502.89 98.63 Barclays 1,710,000.00 3137BUX60FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
4.33 1.29
21,743.71 83,214.62 1,918,953.68 97.91 TD Secur 1,960,000.00 3137FAWS3FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
4.24 1.83
35,044.98 33,940.07 3,186,647.10 101.16 SAN 3,150,000.00 3137HACX2FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
4.27 2.57
10,089.51 10,121.86 3,171,150.67 100.32 JPMorgan 3,161,107.83 3137HAD45FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
4.44 1.78
54,459.94 102,166.19 3,228,280.87 99.42 JPMorgan 3,247,120.66 3136BQDE6FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
4.32 2.70
75,905.95 98,103.00 3,032,295.00 101.08 BMO 3,000,000.00 3137HAQ74FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
4.26 2.74
64,530.44 82,531.25 3,506,125.58 100.90 WellsFar 3,475,000.00 3137HAMH6FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
4.23 2.71
85,387.04 108,773.72 2,364,486.33 101.48 MorganSt 2,330,000.00 3137HAST4FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
4.24 2.82
98,431.77 128,172.57 3,037,821.00 101.26 PNCBank 3,000,000.00 3137HAMS2FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
4.26 2.77
25,239.28 26,267.98 1,153,001.15 102.04 JPMorgan 1,130,000.00 3137HB3D4FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
4.28 2.84
28,452.86 29,986.48 1,745,044.92 101.46 BOFAML 1,720,000.00 3137HB3G7FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
4.28 2.88
(1,361.67)(6,374.19) 1,801,524.02 100.64 JPMorgan 1,790,000.00 3137HBLV4FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
4.28 2.97
Account Page 23PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 50
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
76,464.02 68,570.75 4,106,852.00 102.67 WellsFar 4,000,000.00 3137HCKV3FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
4.29 3.22
(14,417.67)(18,769.81) 1,312,304.09 100.56 BOFAML 1,305,000.00 3137HFNZ4FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.56
(13,116.43)(21,205.30) 2,675,100.80 100.95 MorganSt 2,650,000.00 3137HFF59FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.54
(2,899.93)(8,446.12) 3,367,843.01 100.68 BMO 3,345,000.00 3137HDXL9FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.55
(3,192.79)(10,044.08) 2,392,025.31 101.57 MorganSt 2,355,000.00 3137HH6C0FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
4.31 3.65
41,769.29 39,575.30 3,788,997.41 101.58 JPMorgan 3,730,000.00 3137HHJL6FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
4.32 3.67
2,234.74 2,237.92 1,327,191.55 100.17 JPMorgan 1,325,000.00 3137HKXJ8FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
4.33 3.97
5,079.65 5,085.31 2,090,062.38 100.24 MorganSt 2,085,000.00 3137HKPF5FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
4.33 4.05
(6,053.58)(6,048.42) 3,918,877.00 99.84 GoldmanS 3,925,000.00 3137HMC65FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
4.33 4.29
(13,425.51)(13,487.10) 4,002,275.82 99.56 JPMorgan 4,020,000.00 3137HMCE8FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4.34 4.37
796,374.89 4.30 582,688.94 58,813,362.58 58,413,228.49 Security Type Sub-Total 3.14
Federal Agency Bond / Note
4,468.61 4,742.75 3,110,606.45 100.02 Nomura 3,110,000.00 3130B6R24FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3.93 1.75
4,742.75 3.93 4,468.61 3,110,606.45 3,110,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.75
Corporate Note
(30,570.55)(28,570.88) 1,073,976.02 97.19 JPMorgan 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
4.37 0.86
(25,590.91)(74,891.00) 987,429.00 98.74 SUSQ 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.43 0.96
Account Page 24PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 51
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
8,051.11 51,149.00 987,429.00 98.74 SEEL 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.43 0.96
(63,847.59)(41,374.00) 1,929,366.00 96.47 RBC Capi 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
4.61 1.07
(59,368.38)(34,586.00) 1,933,054.00 96.65 LoopCapM 2,000,000.00 14913R2Q9CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 09/14/2021 1.150% 09/14/2026
4.24 1.09
(29,069.00)(72,940.00) 984,600.00 98.46 07/01/26SUSQ 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026
4.32 1.09
10,334.13 56,893.20 1,181,521.20 98.46 07/21/26RBS 1,200,000.00 172967KY6CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2016 3.200% 10/21/2026
4.51 1.14
10,227.11 10,377.29 780,107.79 101.31 10/13/26MIZU 770,000.00 63743HFK3NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
4.53 1.15
(68,591.71)(60,574.00) 1,928,146.00 96.41 JPMorgan 2,000,000.00 24422EWA3JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
4.26 1.40
19,113.19 37,570.00 2,005,990.00 100.30 01/20/26JPMorgan 2,000,000.00 06051GLE7BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
5.28 0.46
4,421.06 51,669.50 2,280,208.50 99.14 01/26/26MorganSt 2,300,000.00 38141GWB6GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
4.43 1.17
4,557.52 106,407.00 2,056,215.00 97.92 03/02/26GoldmanS 2,100,000.00 89788MAD4TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
4.96 0.57
(24,349.47) 44,062.00 1,942,262.00 97.11 02/03/27CSFirstB 2,000,000.00 808513BY0CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
4.32 1.51
(21,984.00) 19,812.00 1,955,912.00 97.80 03/15/27Scotiaca 2,000,000.00 437076CN0HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/28/2022 2.875% 04/15/2027
4.22 1.61
5,618.94 35,865.50 488,690.50 97.74 05/04/26BOFAML 500,000.00 61772BAB9MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.593% 05/04/2027
5.00 0.73
(11,385.83)(21,486.24) 1,588,921.46 99.62 04/10/27JPMorgan 1,595,000.00 665859AW4NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
4.22 1.63
(4,365.70)(4,227.20) 395,556.80 98.89 04/15/27BOFAML 400,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
4.34 1.66
(19,935.21)(28,039.20) 1,384,448.80 98.89 04/15/27JPMorgan 1,400,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
4.34 1.66
(37,851.28)(13,847.50) 2,447,652.50 97.91 04/19/27JANE 2,500,000.00 693475AT2PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
4.36 1.69
Account Page 25PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 52
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(8,244.90) 8,091.00 2,982,081.00 99.40 JPMorgan 3,000,000.00 63254ABE7NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
4.22 1.76
26,624.40 83,549.40 1,069,699.40 97.25 07/22/26JANE 1,100,000.00 06051GJS9BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.734% 07/22/2027
5.00 0.95
(27,808.61)(65,120.00) 2,495,935.00 99.84 06/27/27BNPPSA 2,500,000.00 459200KT7IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/27/2022 4.150% 07/27/2027
4.23 1.84
(2,435.37) 20,923.80 281,608.80 93.87 06/03/27JANE 300,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.34 1.93
23,473.33 181,749.00 1,408,044.00 93.87 06/03/27GoldmanS 1,500,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.34 1.93
22,264.79 36,227.30 2,311,686.30 100.51 Citigrou 2,300,000.00 89236TKJ3TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
4.30 1.98
(200.79) 76,038.00 2,234,772.00 97.16 08/03/27MorganSt 2,300,000.00 882508BC7TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
4.22 2.09
3,961.30 (41,498.00) 2,044,022.00 102.20 10/15/27TD Secur 2,000,000.00 20030NEA5COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
4.32 2.06
7,540.71 7,585.74 562,263.84 101.31 02/01/28JPMorgan 555,000.00 478160DH4JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
4.01 2.32
23,563.53 20,306.44 1,568,406.84 101.84 04/13/27JANE 1,540,000.00 61747YFP5MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
4.80 1.58
17,034.14 15,787.45 1,093,915.70 101.76 04/22/27MAXE 1,075,000.00 46647PEE2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
4.78 1.61
306.08 419.63 1,123,979.63 99.91 04/01/28MUFG 1,125,000.00 17252MAR1CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
4.23 2.50
(5,048.97)(15,907.20) 2,407,972.80 100.33 04/04/28GoldmanS 2,400,000.00 427866BH0HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
4.11 2.51
281.46 291.08 190,158.08 100.08 04/09/28JPMorgan 190,000.00 231021AY2CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
4.21 2.52
29,902.19 27,875.00 2,532,525.00 101.30 04/15/28JPMorgan 2,500,000.00 30303M8L9META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
4.08 2.52
8,035.05 17,781.50 3,045,608.00 99.86 04/17/28Citigrou 3,050,000.00 58933YBH7MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
4.10 2.55
2,977.33 2,992.22 582,719.62 100.47 HSBC 580,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.47 2.61
Account Page 26PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 53
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
10,240.26 10,231.98 2,230,409.58 100.47 HSBC 2,220,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.47 2.61
16,830.91 18,320.80 814,704.80 101.84 GoldmanS 800,000.00 02665WEM9AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
4.45 2.69
14,605.83 12,457.60 817,817.60 102.23 GoldmanS 800,000.00 24422EXB0JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
4.19 2.72
59,471.17 71,401.50 2,740,999.50 101.52 07/11/28Barclays 2,700,000.00 05565ECE3BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
4.51 2.67
152,170.69 157,790.60 3,540,926.60 104.14 08/29/28GoldmanS 3,400,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
4.38 2.77
31,826.97 30,928.50 2,284,078.50 101.51 MIZU 2,250,000.00 21688ABC5COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
4.33 3.14
15,278.20 15,278.20 1,415,278.20 101.09 01/24/28JPMorgan 1,400,000.00 46647PEU6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
4.65 2.32
32,192.65 32,344.92 1,651,777.92 101.96 01/26/29Citigrou 1,620,000.00 17275RBR2CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
4.25 3.15
6,760.89 6,760.89 651,760.89 101.05 04/20/28BOFAML 645,000.00 06405LAH4BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2025 4.729% 04/20/2029
4.62 2.50
1,359.94 1,462.22 215,879.57 100.41 BOFAML 215,000.00 14913UAQ3CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
4.28 3.60
81,143.15 81,560.90 2,872,284.55 102.77 12/17/29BOFAML 2,795,000.00 00724PAJ8ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
4.27 3.93
17,865.71 17,983.00 891,644.25 101.90 01/07/30RBC Capi 875,000.00 63743HFX5NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
4.48 3.89
23,741.63 23,258.00 2,029,398.00 101.47 01/24/30TD Secur 2,000,000.00 427866BL1HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
4.39 3.96
9,530.77 9,597.76 898,636.56 100.97 02/01/30BOFAML 890,000.00 571676AY1MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
4.58 3.97
9,436.79 9,436.79 614,436.79 101.56 03/24/30MorganSt 605,000.00 857477DB6STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
4.48 4.11
6,206.28 6,289.32 1,024,524.72 100.44 03/28/30BOFAML 1,020,000.00 931142FN8WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
4.24 4.17
978.99 5,076.40 2,573,292.40 91.90 01/30/30JANE 2,800,000.00 09247XAQ4BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
4.30 4.35
Account Page 27PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 54
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(1,816.70)(1,785.63) 1,152,602.22 99.79 04/01/30Citigrou 1,155,000.00 194162AT0COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
4.26 4.19
35,934.37 36,008.63 3,044,142.43 101.13 04/20/30BOFAML 3,010,000.00 637639AQ8NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
4.43 4.19
12,580.11 12,580.11 822,580.11 101.55 04/29/30Citigrou 810,000.00 17325FBP2CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
4.55 4.19
967,344.32 4.39 323,977.71 88,554,059.77 88,895,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.29
Certificate of Deposit
(175.00)(175.00) 999,825.00 99.98 NAT 1,000,000.00 63873TBC1NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 02/18/2025 4.510% 02/13/2026
4.39 0.52
34,010.10 34,010.10 2,334,010.10 101.48 WellsFar 2,300,000.00 63873QP65NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
4.19 1.06
13,063.40 13,063.40 3,113,063.40 100.42 CRAG 3,100,000.00 22536DWD6CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
4.38 1.42
46,898.50 4.31 46,898.50 6,446,898.50 6,400,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.15
Bank Note
47,319.00 49,171.65 4,721,366.65 100.99 07/07/26BOFAML 4,675,000.00 94988J6D4WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
4.41 0.88
49,171.65 4.41 47,319.00 4,721,366.65 4,675,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.88
Asset-Backed Security
(42.04)(40.91) 39,733.16 99.89 BOFAML 39,775.60 448977AD0HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
4.51 0.04
1,377.42 1,419.42 1,455,182.33 100.09 JPMorgan 1,453,876.75 43813YAB8HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
4.57 0.31
30.63 36.34 159,178.88 100.02 MIZU 159,155.00 98164RAB2WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
4.53 0.08
4,709.16 4,756.74 622,470.28 100.75 MIZU 617,838.96 65480MAD5NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
4.67 0.58
Account Page 28PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 55
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
3,599.77 3,624.17 398,554.61 100.90 JPMorgan 395,000.00 438123AC5HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
4.61 0.82
7,410.38 4,610.42 2,128,973.70 101.38 WellsFar 2,100,000.00 50117DAC0KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
4.42 1.56
10,003.45 10,004.33 1,485,003.45 100.68 MUFG 1,475,000.00 89237QAD2TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
4.38 1.25
1,608.92 1,625.91 1,216,536.97 100.13 Barclays 1,215,000.00 448976AD2HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
4.35 1.55
12,927.09 14,266.87 3,001,845.00 100.06 BOFAML 3,000,000.00 43816DAC9HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
4.31 1.38
36,306.14 36,351.21 3,101,179.26 101.18 BOFAML 3,065,000.00 05522RDJ4BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
4.26 1.67
15,913.76 15,933.31 2,110,838.20 100.76 Citigrou 2,095,000.00 02589BAE0AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
4.26 1.83
1,238.87 1,268.08 976,080.30 100.11 MIZU 975,000.00 38014AAD3GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
4.33 1.31
6,918.41 6,928.74 2,346,849.18 100.29 Barclays 2,340,000.00 92868MAD1VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
4.36 1.92
7,570.36 7,591.75 1,837,411.50 100.41 WellsFar 1,830,000.00 096924AD7BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
4.32 1.56
(1,192.15)(1,186.51) 733,731.39 99.83 JPMorgan 735,000.00 437921AD1HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
4.25 2.07
3,119.84 3,158.05 1,752,898.00 100.17 WellsFar 1,750,000.00 92970QAE5WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
4.22 2.06
(2,834.82)(2,808.92) 2,831,915.52 99.89 SGAS 2,835,000.00 34535KAD0FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
4.52 1.96
646.11 649.42 525,613.20 100.12 BOFAML 525,000.00 05594BAD8BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
4.30 1.88
14,514.75 14,551.23 1,569,220.48 100.91 SGAS 1,555,000.00 58773DAD6MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
4.32 1.88
1,617.05 1,632.15 2,791,512.18 100.05 BOFAML 2,790,000.00 92348KDY6VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
4.55 2.06
7,042.68 7,045.46 2,581,998.85 100.27 RBC Capi 2,575,000.00 02582JKP4AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
4.19 2.50
Account Page 29PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 56
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
334.57 338.67 610,248.88 100.04 TD Secur 610,000.00 362549AD9GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
4.27 2.06
8,989.07 9,001.00 3,278,946.72 100.27 WellsFar 3,270,000.00 92970QAJ4WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
4.25 2.57
7,076.06 7,079.26 2,116,775.21 100.32 Barclays 2,110,000.00 02582JKV1AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
4.20 2.72
147,836.19 4.34 148,885.48 39,672,697.25 39,515,646.32 Security Type Sub-Total 1.82
402,618,874.80 397,664,079.58 6,044,355.65 1,483,633.03 4.16 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.50
Total Investments $400,274,901.80
$2,610,822.22
$397,664,079.58
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $402,618,874.80 $6,044,355.65 $1,483,633.03 4.16% 2.50
Account Page 30PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 57
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
07/03/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
91282CHF1 (2,667,163.09)(9,044.57)(2,676,207.66) 2,675,000.00 07/01/25
07/17/25 FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3137HMC65 (3,924,925.42)(7,551.70)(3,932,477.12) 3,925,000.00 07/09/25
07/22/25 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
02582JKV1 (2,109,695.95) 0.00 (2,109,695.95) 2,110,000.00 07/15/25
07/31/25 FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
3137HMCE8 (4,015,762.92)(14,291.10)(4,030,054.02) 4,020,000.00 07/22/25
(30,887.37) (12,748,434.75)(12,717,547.38) 12,730,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
07/25/25 FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
3137HKXJ8 0.00 4,869.38 4,869.38 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 0.00 12,649.88 12,649.88 07/01/25
07/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 0.00 11,316.11 11,316.11 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
3137HKPF5 0.00 7,697.13 7,697.13 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 0.00 12,663.61 12,663.61 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3137FAWS3 0.00 5,216.87 5,216.87 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 0.00 4,773.31 4,773.31 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 0.00 9,417.08 9,417.08 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 0.00 12,598.61 12,598.61 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3137HAMS2 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 0.00 6,966.00 6,966.00 07/01/25
Account Page 31PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 58
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/25/25 FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3137HFF59 0.00 10,198.08 10,198.08 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
3137HFNZ4 0.00 4,902.45 4,902.45 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 0.00 6,819.90 6,819.90 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 0.00 14,895.13 14,895.13 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 0.00 9,402.34 9,402.34 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 0.00 4,863.53 4,863.53 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 0.00 13,465.63 13,465.63 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3137HCKV3 0.00 17,266.67 17,266.67 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 0.00 11,850.00 11,850.00 07/01/25
07/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
MONEY0002 0.00 2,107.24 2,107.24 07/02/25
07/07/25 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
02665WEM9 0.00 20,500.00 20,500.00 07/07/25
07/09/25 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
21688ABC5 0.00 54,000.00 54,000.00 07/09/25
07/11/25 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
24422EWA3 0.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 07/11/25
07/14/25 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
24422EXB0 0.00 19,800.00 19,800.00 07/14/25
07/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 0.00 3,212.08 3,212.08 07/15/25
07/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
437921AD1 0.00 2,541.88 2,541.88 07/15/25
07/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
05522RDJ4 0.00 12,592.04 12,592.04 07/15/25
Account Page 32PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 59
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
58773DAD6 0.00 6,194.08 6,194.08 07/15/25
07/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
50117DAC0 0.00 9,205.00 9,205.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 0.00 972.72 972.72 07/15/25
07/15/25 HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
448977AD0 0.00 181.07 181.07 07/15/25
07/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
43816DAC9 0.00 10,825.00 10,825.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
02582JKP4 0.00 9,184.17 9,184.17 07/15/25
07/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
02589BAE0 0.00 8,118.13 8,118.13 07/15/25
07/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
92970QAE5 0.00 6,256.25 6,256.25 07/15/25
07/15/25 HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
448976AD2 0.00 4,465.13 4,465.13 07/15/25
07/15/25 WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
92970QAJ4 0.00 13,797.58 13,797.58 07/15/25
07/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
34535KAD0 0.00 10,513.13 10,513.13 07/15/25
07/15/25 TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
89237QAD2 0.00 5,998.33 5,998.33 07/15/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
38014AAD3 0.00 3,575.00 3,575.00 07/16/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3
DTD 01/19/2022 1.260% 11/16/2026
380146AC4 0.00 18.43 18.43 07/16/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 0.00 2,175.67 2,175.67 07/16/25
07/17/25 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
00724PAJ8 0.00 69,176.25 69,176.25 07/17/25
07/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
05594BAD8 0.00 1,903.13 1,903.13 07/20/25
Account Page 33PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 60
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
92868MAD1 0.00 8,775.00 8,775.00 07/20/25
07/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
92348KDY6 0.00 10,485.75 10,485.75 07/20/25
07/20/25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
06051GLE7 0.00 50,800.00 50,800.00 07/20/25
07/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 0.00 1,866.38 1,866.38 07/21/25
07/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 0.00 6,784.22 6,784.22 07/21/25
07/22/25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.734% 07/22/2027
06051GJS9 0.00 9,537.00 9,537.00 07/22/25
07/24/25 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
46647PEU6 0.00 34,405.00 34,405.00 07/24/25
07/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
096924AD7 0.00 6,954.00 6,954.00 07/25/25
07/26/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
38141GWB6 0.00 44,275.00 44,275.00 07/26/25
07/27/25 IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/27/2022 4.150% 07/27/2027
459200KT7 0.00 51,875.00 51,875.00 07/27/25
07/27/25 MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
61761J3R8 0.00 31,250.00 31,250.00 07/27/25
07/29/25 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
169894AT9 0.00 100.68 100.68 07/29/25
07/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 110.75 110.75 07/30/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
91282CFB2 0.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
91282CFC0 0.00 72,187.50 72,187.50 07/31/25
Account Page 34PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 61
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2020 1.500% 01/31/2027
912828Z78 0.00 16,125.00 16,125.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
91282CGJ4 0.00 113,750.00 113,750.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
91282CDW8 0.00 57,750.00 57,750.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 0.00 11,625.00 11,625.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
91282CGH8 0.00 79,625.00 79,625.00 07/31/25
1,130,925.30 1,130,925.30 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
MATURITY
07/29/25 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
169894AT9 245,000.00 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 0.00 245,000.00 07/29/25
07/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 245,000.00 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 0.00 245,000.00 07/30/25
0.00 0.00 0.00 490,000.00 490,000.00 490,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
PAYDOWNS
07/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 341.12 0.00 341.12 12.71 7.91 341.12 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 3,709.73 0.00 3,709.73 0.10 0.06 3,709.73 07/01/25
07/15/25 HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
448977AD0 58,097.63 0.00 58,097.63 2.23 0.61 58,097.63 07/15/25
07/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 32,161.04 0.00 32,161.04 6.53 4.12 32,161.04 07/15/25
07/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 71,985.40 0.00 71,985.40 5.64 3.13 71,985.40 07/15/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3
DTD 01/19/2022 1.260% 11/16/2026
380146AC4 17,550.08 0.00 17,550.08 1.52 0.42 17,550.08 07/16/25
Account Page 35PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 62
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
PAYDOWNS
07/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 210,962.10 0.00 210,962.10 16.52 10.61 210,962.10 07/21/25
0.00 26.86 45.25 394,807.10 394,807.10 394,807.10 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
07/03/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 19,420.31 13.52 19,433.83 389.06 (374.05)FIFO 20,000.00 07/02/25
07/11/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 880,568.36 929.35 881,497.71 25,123.05 6,514.15 FIFO 950,000.00 07/09/25
07/11/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 2,827,087.89 2,983.69 2,830,071.58 229,583.98 (6,310.80)FIFO 3,050,000.00 07/09/25
07/22/25 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2023 5.272% 08/03/2026
857477CD3 1,916,511.00 47,023.31 1,963,534.31 15,447.00 16,165.45 FIFO 1,900,000.00 07/21/25
07/23/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 965,859.37 2,986.88 968,846.25 (27,148.44)(32,705.25)FIFO 1,000,000.00 07/22/25
07/23/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 2,897,578.13 8,960.63 2,906,538.76 (94,453.12)(100,791.40)FIFO 3,000,000.00 07/22/25
62,897.38 (117,501.90) 148,941.53 9,569,922.44 9,507,025.06 9,920,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(2,325,715.22) 1,162,935.31 (1,162,779.91) 148,986.78 (117,475.04)Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions $148,986.78 ($1,162,779.91)$1,162,935.31 ($2,325,715.22)($117,475.04)
Account Page 36PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 63
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Portfolio Summary
July 31, 2025
Cash Dividends Closing
Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value
$ $ 196,878.79
-
-
PFM Managed Account
PFM Cash Balance
CAMP Pool
State Pool
-
65,388,392.51
494,727.04
34,461,914.01
147,384.61
Total $ 196,878.79 $ 100,492,418.17
Peter Castro, Treasurer Date
I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the
investment policy adopted June 26, 2025. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance
Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six
months' estimated expenditures.
ATTACHMENT 2
-
Page 64
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
July 31, 2025
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS
https://www.pfmam.comOnline Access 1-717-232-2723Customer Service
Meredith LaBuda Sullivan
Senior Portfolio Manager
Jeremy King
Key Account Manager
Rachael Miller
Client Consultant
Tiffany Tint, CFA
Institutional Relationship Manager
Page 65
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a
representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.
Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and
investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of
each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the
products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The
stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this
statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending
on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable
security has or is still able to be called.
Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share
(normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month
by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning
of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by
365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.
YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based
on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized
basis.
YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the
current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM
according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The
investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.
Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final
consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.
Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your
statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information
about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have
other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated
copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your
client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.
PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide
specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division
of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment
adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank")
and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does
not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a
written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would
like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service
Operations at the address below.
Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.
However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request
is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to
their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting
Service Operations at the address below.
Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our
investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in
pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets
and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the
official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that
clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank
statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.
Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile
due to a timing difference.
Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit
funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing
internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.
Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as
of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be
differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income
and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured
bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be
reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities
could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered
investment company or local government investment program is contained in the
appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.
Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the
amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date
until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities
(those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a
straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is
amortized using the constant yield basis.
Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational
purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine
the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such
information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the
accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or
other taxing authorities.
Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified
of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.
Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be
redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.
Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not
guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain
non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in
securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual
settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for
securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any
changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s
beginning values.
Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected
sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are
distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at
1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA
Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.
Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned,
plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and
losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any
premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may
be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent
the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings
on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on
the actual distribution date.
Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than
investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one
share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a
percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of
the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by
multiplying it by
Page 66
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
6,508,418.48 6.51 Asset-Backed Security
620,120.90 0.62 Federal Agency Bond / Note
13,159,800.52 13.16 Corporate Note
883,678.25 0.88 Bank Note
998,401.06 1.00 Certificate of Deposit
9,423,193.74 9.42 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
323,140.61 0.32 Municipal Bond / Note
1,083,628.26 1.08 Corporate Note
32,388,010.69 32.39 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
34,461,914.01 34.47 CAMP Pool
147,384.61 0.15 Local Agency Investment Fund
$99,997,691.13 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 196,878.79 65,388,392.51
CAMP Pool 0.00 34,461,914.01
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 147,384.61
$196,878.79 $99,997,691.13 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
34,609,298.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,371,401.38
16,401,149.78
14,030,238.90
17,898,823.15
15,686,779.30
0.00
34.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.37
16.40
14.03
17.90
15.69
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $99,997,691.13
707
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
6.51%ABS
0.62%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
13.16%
Corporate Note
0.88%
Bank Note
1.00%
Cert of Deposit
9.42%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.32%
Muni Bond / Note
1.08%
Priv Placement
Bond
32.39%
US TSY Bond / Note
34.47%
CAMP Pool
0.15%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
Summary Page 1PFM Asset Management
Page 67
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$64,870,620.94
(304,495.96)
(1,291,783.37)
1,856,527.97
509,270.19
(251,747.26)
$65,388,392.51
216,097.66
(7,782.06)
(11,436.81)
$196,878.79
Total
65,147,517.21
436,590.32
1,304,521.71
304,495.96
203,359.32
(2,373,944.87)
(64,354,373.04)
(454,592.29)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $213,574.32
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
245,000.00
1,304,521.71
203,359.32
59,495.96
(1,864,310.03)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$494,727.04 Closing Cash Balance
Account Page 1PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 68
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 33,340,000.00 32,388,010.69 49.54
Municipal Bond / Note 320,000.00 323,140.61 0.49
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
9,372,879.83 9,423,193.74 14.41
Federal Agency Bond / Note 620,000.00 620,120.90 0.95
Corporate Note 14,265,000.00 14,243,428.78 21.78
Certificate of Deposit 990,000.00 998,401.06 1.53
Bank Note 875,000.00 883,678.25 1.35
Asset-Backed Security 6,482,407.16 6,508,418.48 9.95
Managed Account Sub-Total 66,265,286.98 65,388,392.51 100.00%
Accrued Interest 436,590.32
Total Portfolio 66,265,286.98 65,824,982.83
Unsettled Trades 510,000.00 506,790.42
Sector Allocation
9.95%ABS
1.35%
Bank Note
1.53%
Cert of Deposit
20.13%
Corporate Note
0.95%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
14.41%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.49%
Muni Bond / Note
1.66%
Priv Placement
Bond
49.53%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
0.00%
2.10%
25.08%
21.46%
27.37%
23.99%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1081
4.24%
4.15%
Account Page 2PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 69
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
3.60%
A
9.77%
A+
6.25%
A-
0.72%
AA
65.62%
AA+
2.63%
AA-
6.90%
AAA
0.92%
BBB+
3.59%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
472,719.46 0.72 Adobe Inc
302,938.20 0.46 Amazon.com Inc
1,322,321.24 2.02 American Express Co
505,902.00 0.77 BA Credit Card Trust
436,147.53 0.67 Bank of America Corp
456,833.25 0.70 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
413,564.85 0.63 BlackRock Inc
296,194.75 0.45 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust
95,388.65 0.15 Caterpillar Inc
291,339.30 0.45 Charles Schwab Corp
184,832.21 0.28 Cintas Corp
275,296.32 0.42 Cisco Systems Inc
1,021,298.98 1.56 Citigroup Inc
184,615.94 0.28 Colgate-Palmolive Co
434,354.68 0.66 Comcast Corp
375,604.02 0.57 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA
592,486.26 0.91 Credit Agricole Group
30,024.96 0.05 Cummins Inc
192,814.60 0.29 Deere & Co
480,387.93 0.73 Depository Trust & Clearing Corp
620,120.90 0.95 Federal Home Loan Banks
8,853,497.12 13.54 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
569,696.62 0.87 Federal National Mortgage Association
454,504.96 0.70 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust
260,218.08 0.40 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv
431,256.83 0.66 Goldman Sachs Group Inc
405,914.80 0.62 Groupe BPCE
730,821.55 1.12 Hershey Co
936,339.23 1.43 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust
498,450.90 0.76 Honda Motor Co Ltd
462,156.94 0.71 HSBC Holdings PLC
204,358.75 0.31 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
Account Page 3PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 70
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
121,036.00 0.19 International Business Machines Corp
91,177.92 0.14 Johnson & Johnson
334,470.08 0.51 JPMorgan Chase & Co
354,828.95 0.54 Kubota Credit Owner Trust
146,221.91 0.22 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA
146,407.08 0.22 Mars Inc
267,423.43 0.41 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust
474,316.00 0.73 Merck & Co Inc
455,854.50 0.70 Meta Platforms Inc
461,506.34 0.71 Morgan Stanley
397,610.80 0.61 National Australia Bank Ltd
269,127.11 0.41 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi
114,917.59 0.18 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust
398,475.60 0.61 Northern Trust Corp
253,534.00 0.39 PepsiCo Inc
269,241.78 0.41 PNC Financial Services Group Inc
176,918.70 0.27 State of Connecticut
364,004.72 0.56 State Street Corp
388,656.00 0.59 Texas Instruments Inc
241,627.68 0.37 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
802,179.09 1.23 Toyota Motor Corp
635,357.69 0.97 Truist Financial Corp
32,388,010.69 49.53 United States Treasury
311,500.98 0.48 UnitedHealth Group Inc
455,246.61 0.70 Verizon Master Trust
376,097.63 0.58 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust
165,731.94 0.25 Walmart Inc
883,678.25 1.35 Wells Fargo & Co
826,954.80 1.26 WF Card Issuance Trust
23,876.83 0.04 World Omni Auto Trust
$65,388,392.51 Total 100.00%
Account Page 4PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 71
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
121,298.88 124,383.42 95.11 121,972.66 01/07/2201/06/22Aa1AA+ 125,000.00 91282CCJ8 1.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
509,455.28 510,492.65 399.46 496,617.19 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CCJ8 3.99
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2016 1.500% 08/15/2026
973,125.00 985,336.22 6,919.89 939,023.44 04/22/2204/21/22Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 9128282A7 3.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
1,444,687.50 1,468,004.92 4,410.86 1,379,472.66 05/13/2205/12/22Aa1AA+ 1,500,000.00 91282CCZ2 2.84
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
192,757.80 192,760.04 568.61 188,554.69 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 200,000.00 91282CDG3 4.14
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
298,774.59 309,648.63 881.35 308,595.31 11/03/2111/01/21Aa1AA+ 310,000.00 91282CDG3 1.22
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
963,789.00 998,472.93 2,843.07 993,945.31 11/18/2111/17/21Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CDG3 1.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
574,483.65 569,682.76 1,062.50 565,948.24 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 575,000.00 91282CJT9 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
924,169.35 923,732.24 1,709.24 922,904.30 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 925,000.00 91282CJT9 4.10
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.125% 01/31/2027
695,624.11 693,820.36 77.90 693,452.54 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 695,000.00 91282CMH1 4.24
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
681,488.50 695,261.79 7,265.88 686,054.69 08/03/2208/01/22Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 912828V98 2.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
669,347.70 665,409.57 3,295.52 623,792.97 09/08/2309/05/23Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 912828ZB9 4.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
301,089.90 301,182.09 4,815.90 301,277.34 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CKE0 3.99
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
426,544.03 424,858.32 6,822.52 424,817.38 02/05/2502/04/25Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 91282CKE0 4.27
Account Page 5PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 72
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
534,789.20 532,936.28 2,768.68 526,968.75 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 912828X88 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
488,515.50 489,340.51 37.36 475,625.00 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CFB2 3.93
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2020 0.375% 09/30/2027
278,109.30 277,125.32 378.07 269,636.72 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CAL5 4.09
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
426,726.78 430,551.86 5,891.65 432,570.31 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 91282CFM8 3.49
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
463,515.50 465,377.19 631.79 425,820.31 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CAU5 3.91
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
741,624.80 737,559.39 1,010.87 720,375.00 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 800,000.00 91282CAU5 4.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
140,585.20 139,299.09 1,224.05 139,130.47 12/31/2412/26/24Aa1AA+ 140,000.00 91282CLX7 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
794,965.05 802,045.92 3,934.44 776,950.20 01/30/2301/25/23Aa1AA+ 825,000.00 9128283F5 3.58
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
763,447.58 752,403.34 16.81 701,991.21 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 825,000.00 91282CBJ9 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
972,031.00 986,242.96 12,686.46 973,671.88 04/06/2304/05/23Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 9128283W8 3.34
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
280,019.40 278,448.32 1,260.25 261,703.13 07/07/2307/05/23Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CBS9 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
466,699.00 458,423.16 2,100.41 429,921.88 10/04/2310/02/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CBS9 4.75
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
521,411.10 519,838.56 6,395.75 519,093.75 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CGT2 4.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
605,541.30 609,275.88 2,053.33 577,281.25 06/05/2306/01/23Aa1AA+ 650,000.00 91282CBZ3 3.77
Account Page 6PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 73
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
719,085.30 706,423.71 842.39 665,561.53 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 775,000.00 91282CCH2 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 1.000% 07/31/2028
666,235.12 665,691.26 19.70 634,601.56 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 725,000.00 91282CCR0 4.01
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
1,000,863.22 990,321.39 15,232.17 995,197.66 12/05/2312/04/23Aa1AA+ 980,000.00 91282CJA0 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
720,453.30 722,076.14 8,623.98 731,308.59 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 91282CJF9 3.83
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
693,026.74 686,460.19 4,702.79 676,413.67 03/06/2403/04/24Aa1AA+ 710,000.00 9128285M8 4.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
1,566,879.30 1,545,042.93 5,135.87 1,534,517.58 04/03/2404/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,575,000.00 91282CJR3 4.35
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
255,792.90 251,223.24 13.08 244,137.70 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 275,000.00 91282CDW8 4.45
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
511,585.80 514,015.51 26.15 498,738.28 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 91282CDW8 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
1,221,559.65 1,192,864.76 15,440.00 1,167,123.05 05/06/2405/02/24Aa1AA+ 1,275,000.00 9128286B1 4.62
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
1,137,280.80 1,117,212.71 9,577.87 1,093,734.38 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 1,200,000.00 91282CEE7 4.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
178,344.26 174,923.20 1,344.14 172,310.16 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 185,000.00 91282CEM9 4.47
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
964,023.00 965,207.71 7,265.63 956,757.81 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CEM9 3.88
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
268,339.78 271,224.37 777.17 270,423.83 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 275,000.00 91282CEV9 3.63
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
512,285.03 515,333.32 1,483.70 513,290.04 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CEV9 3.76
Account Page 7PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 74
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
333,361.35 333,318.15 24.97 332,705.08 06/04/2505/30/25Aa1AA+ 350,000.00 91282CFC0 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
466,705.89 473,936.39 34.95 470,878.52 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 490,000.00 91282CFC0 3.51
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
523,892.78 526,976.90 6,836.83 527,009.77 07/03/2507/01/25Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CFL0 3.78
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
623,681.88 617,550.61 8,139.09 616,357.42 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 625,000.00 91282CFL0 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
381,460.13 375,774.24 1,426.63 375,849.61 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 91282CMD0 4.32
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
701,886.63 690,436.07 2,625.00 690,485.16 01/07/2501/02/25Aa1AA+ 690,000.00 91282CMD0 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
966,993.21 962,113.78 93.68 960,221.09 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 985,000.00 91282CGJ4 4.07
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
113,373.79 112,750.70 1,400.97 112,655.08 05/13/2505/12/25Aa1AA+ 115,000.00 91282CGS4 4.09
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
315,474.88 312,634.99 3,898.36 312,212.50 04/15/2504/11/25Aa1AA+ 320,000.00 91282CGS4 4.17
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
696,411.55 697,272.03 9,342.62 697,416.21 04/02/2504/01/25Aa1AA+ 695,000.00 91282CMU2 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
594,398.40 592,072.25 3,811.48 591,867.19 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 91282CHF1 4.05
189,676.95 32,388,010.69 32,354,770.27 3.89 31,718,942.05 33,340,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
146,221.91 145,000.00 1,389.56 145,000.00 05/13/2504/24/25Aa2NR 145,000.00 544647KY5 4.42
CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
176,918.70 175,000.00 1,833.01 175,000.00 05/07/2504/23/25Aa3AA- 175,000.00 20772KZK8 4.49
Account Page 8PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 75
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Municipal Bond / Note
3,222.57 323,140.61 320,000.00 4.46 320,000.00 320,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
305,740.29 303,506.23 881.69 294,500.00 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 310,000.00 3137BUX60 5.03
FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
342,670.30 338,787.50 931.58 327,810.55 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 350,000.00 3137FAWS3 4.97
FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
596,748.40 594,849.76 2,368.03 594,843.68 07/27/2307/19/23Aa1AA+ 594,858.54 3137HAD45 4.78
FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
606,980.40 600,305.17 2,409.50 600,515.63 08/01/2307/27/23Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 3137HACX2 4.80
FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
569,696.62 560,086.05 2,000.80 551,667.30 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 573,021.29 3136BQDE6 5.04
FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
555,920.75 542,004.66 2,172.50 537,935.20 10/19/2310/11/23Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 3137HAQ74 5.25
FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
605,374.20 594,232.25 2,325.00 591,124.20 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 3137HAMH6 4.99
FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
456,660.45 440,169.39 1,818.75 435,652.65 10/31/2310/25/23Aa1AA+ 450,000.00 3137HAST4 5.60
FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
224,478.10 219,564.26 929.32 219,363.98 11/21/2311/14/23Aa1AA+ 220,000.00 3137HB3D4 5.14
FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
324,659.52 319,365.97 1,296.00 319,080.64 12/07/2311/28/23Aa1AA+ 320,000.00 3137HB3G7 4.93
FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
291,867.02 292,087.63 1,104.90 292,899.71 02/08/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 290,000.00 3137HBLV4 4.34
FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
308,013.90 302,279.10 1,295.00 302,871.09 07/05/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 3137HCKV3 4.95
Account Page 9PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 76
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
216,203.36 218,578.68 807.68 219,295.70 09/12/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 215,000.00 3137HFNZ4 4.06
FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
429,025.60 431,129.18 1,635.54 432,426.45 08/22/2408/13/24Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 3137HFF59 4.23
FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
553,755.95 554,232.77 2,082.21 555,144.70 08/15/2408/07/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 3137HDXL9 4.33
FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
365,659.92 366,147.99 1,437.30 367,195.32 10/16/2410/08/24Aa1AA+ 360,000.00 3137HH6C0 4.34
FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
604,411.12 597,748.19 2,376.03 598,098.17 11/27/2411/19/24Aa1AA+ 595,000.00 3137HHJL6 4.67
FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
210,347.34 209,993.15 771.75 209,992.65 04/24/2504/15/25Aa1AA+ 210,000.00 3137HKXJ8 4.41
FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
360,874.08 359,997.02 1,329.00 359,996.04 03/20/2503/11/25Aa1AA+ 360,000.00 3137HKPF5 4.43
FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
589,079.60 589,989.57 2,128.43 589,988.79 07/17/2507/09/25Aa1AA+ 590,000.00 3137HMC65 4.33
FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
398,236.40 399,572.27 1,422.00 399,578.40 07/31/2507/22/25Aa1AA+ 400,000.00 3137HMCE8 4.29
FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290% 07/01/2030
506,790.42 509,270.19 0.00 509,270.19 08/07/2507/29/25Aa1AA+ 510,000.00 3137HMCK4 4.32
33,523.01 9,423,193.74 9,343,896.98 4.71 9,309,251.04 9,372,879.83 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
620,120.90 619,230.05 3,203.33 619,175.40 06/13/2506/12/25Aa1AA+ 620,000.00 3130B6R24 3.95
3,203.33 620,120.90 619,230.05 3.95 619,175.40 620,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
Account Page 10PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 77
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
CITIGROUP INC
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
168,583.05 172,604.71 1,445.00 187,113.90 05/27/2105/25/21A3BBB+ 170,000.00 172967KN0 1.29
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
106,911.64 109,954.86 147.81 109,755.80 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 110,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
242,981.00 245,327.91 335.94 228,305.00 05/16/2205/12/22A1A+ 250,000.00 89236TJK2 3.42
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
222,171.53 220,360.03 78.13 210,663.00 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 225,000.00 61761J3R8 5.41
STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2023 5.272% 08/03/2026
216,743.01 215,038.07 5,604.43 215,120.40 08/03/2308/01/23Aa3A 215,000.00 857477CD3 5.25
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
192,936.60 199,321.36 1,025.56 197,074.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 200,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/04/2021 1.650% 11/04/2026
217,493.33 220,090.82 897.19 207,758.25 06/03/2206/01/22A2A- 225,000.00 025816CM9 3.54
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
157,034.69 154,975.98 1,880.67 154,945.75 11/02/2310/30/23A2A- 155,000.00 63743HFK3 5.61
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
192,814.60 199,673.77 188.89 198,872.00 01/13/2201/11/22A1A 200,000.00 24422EWA3 1.82
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
351,048.25 347,703.44 543.28 344,473.50 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 350,000.00 06051GLE7 5.58
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
431,256.83 430,420.67 232.60 421,484.55 09/07/2209/02/22A2BBB+ 435,000.00 38141GWB6 4.64
IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/09/2022 2.200% 02/09/2027
121,036.00 123,696.11 1,313.89 120,833.75 03/28/2203/24/22A3A- 125,000.00 459200KM2 2.94
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
269,266.25 268,669.43 1,442.09 255,332.00 03/28/2203/24/22Baa1A- 275,000.00 89788MAD4 2.83
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
291,339.30 294,991.72 3,021.67 284,730.00 04/29/2204/27/22A2A- 300,000.00 808513BY0 3.60
Account Page 11PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 78
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
398,475.60 401,893.29 3,600.00 405,484.00 05/16/2205/12/22A2A+ 400,000.00 665859AW4 3.70
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
64,277.98 64,987.41 507.72 64,964.90 05/20/2205/17/22A2A+ 65,000.00 91324PEG3 3.71
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
247,223.00 251,084.66 1,952.78 253,095.00 06/03/2206/01/22A2A+ 250,000.00 91324PEG3 3.43
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
269,241.78 273,405.42 1,732.50 270,765.00 08/08/2208/04/22A3A- 275,000.00 693475AT2 3.50
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
397,610.80 398,710.12 2,256.22 396,532.00 06/13/2206/09/22Aa2AA- 400,000.00 63254ABE7 4.10
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
178,352.24 179,894.64 1,056.88 165,100.50 08/24/2208/22/22Baa1A- 190,000.00 89788MAC6 4.08
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
187,739.20 184,609.42 1,112.50 163,506.00 10/31/2210/27/22Baa1A- 200,000.00 89788MAC6 5.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
452,286.45 447,930.29 7,450.63 445,198.50 10/06/2210/04/22A1A+ 450,000.00 89236TKJ3 4.79
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
388,656.00 388,690.92 2,835.56 375,432.00 12/09/2212/07/22Aa3A+ 400,000.00 882508BC7 4.30
COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
434,354.68 433,512.90 4,800.14 443,173.00 01/30/2301/25/23A3A- 425,000.00 20030NEA5 4.35
AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/01/2022 4.550% 12/01/2027
302,938.20 301,237.07 2,275.00 302,691.00 12/09/2212/07/22A1AA 300,000.00 023135CP9 4.35
JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
91,177.92 89,955.10 1,831.38 89,947.80 02/20/2502/18/25AaaAAA 90,000.00 478160DH4 4.57
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
239,334.81 235,739.08 3,984.66 236,236.10 05/06/2405/02/24A1A- 235,000.00 61747YFP5 5.50
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
132,287.48 130,227.54 1,991.63 130,378.30 05/06/2405/02/24A1A 130,000.00 46647PEE2 5.49
Account Page 12PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 79
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
184,832.21 184,781.87 1,920.92 184,763.20 05/02/2504/28/25A3A- 185,000.00 17252MAR1 4.25
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
426,411.85 427,305.94 4,365.10 429,228.75 05/08/2305/04/23A1A 425,000.00 427866BH0 4.03
CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
30,024.96 29,980.52 290.42 29,979.00 05/09/2505/06/25A2A 30,000.00 231021AY2 4.28
META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
455,854.50 450,472.11 4,370.00 450,837.00 06/05/2306/01/23Aa3AA- 450,000.00 30303M8L9 4.56
MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
474,316.00 473,064.64 3,954.38 471,546.75 05/22/2305/18/23Aa3A+ 475,000.00 58933YBH7 4.21
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
462,156.94 460,035.08 3,446.17 460,036.80 06/03/2505/28/25A2A- 460,000.00 40428HR95 4.65
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
305,514.30 299,202.71 1,025.00 298,644.00 07/11/2307/07/23A3A- 300,000.00 02665WEM9 5.23
BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
456,833.25 446,921.39 10,731.25 444,933.00 08/17/2308/14/23A2A 450,000.00 05565ECE3 5.31
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
598,833.18 573,098.43 11,307.79 572,148.00 10/04/2310/02/23Aa3A+ 575,000.00 17325FBB3 5.92
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
375,604.02 370,370.25 1,085.33 370,518.00 01/12/2401/10/24Aa2A+ 370,000.00 21688ABC5 4.77
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
202,182.60 200,000.00 191.14 200,000.00 01/24/2501/16/25A1A 200,000.00 46647PEU6 4.92
CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
275,296.32 269,930.88 5,638.13 269,905.50 02/26/2402/21/24A1AA- 270,000.00 17275RBR2 4.86
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
95,388.65 94,787.74 1,904.95 94,742.55 08/16/2408/12/24A2A 95,000.00 14913UAQ3 4.44
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
472,719.46 459,364.95 885.50 459,296.20 01/17/2501/14/25A1A+ 460,000.00 00724PAJ8 4.98
Account Page 13PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 80
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Corporate Note
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
112,092.42 109,846.44 2,631.75 109,831.70 02/07/2502/04/25A2NR 110,000.00 63743HFX5 4.98
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
253,534.00 248,693.16 5,558.33 248,570.00 02/10/2502/07/25A1A+ 250,000.00 713448GB8 4.73
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
304,409.70 300,848.46 6,214.58 300,921.00 02/25/2502/24/25A1A 300,000.00 427866BL1 4.68
MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
146,407.08 144,854.31 2,687.33 144,843.40 03/12/2503/05/25A2A 145,000.00 571676AY1 4.83
STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
147,261.71 145,000.00 1,888.62 145,000.00 04/24/2504/22/25Aa3A 145,000.00 857477DB6 4.83
WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
165,731.94 164,727.98 1,854.19 164,714.55 04/28/2504/23/25Aa2AA 165,000.00 931142FN8 4.39
BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
413,564.85 413,407.51 2,730.00 412,749.00 06/27/2506/26/25Aa3AA- 450,000.00 09247XAQ4 4.31
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
184,615.94 184,906.93 1,920.92 184,901.95 05/02/2504/28/25Aa3A+ 185,000.00 194162AT0 4.21
NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
480,387.93 474,717.22 4,402.99 474,705.50 05/20/2505/13/25Aa1AA+ 475,000.00 637639AQ8 4.71
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
253,882.75 250,000.00 2,115.75 250,000.00 05/29/2505/21/25Aa3A+ 250,000.00 17325FBP2 4.91
138,665.29 14,243,428.78 14,161,025.26 4.43 14,051,781.85 14,265,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit
NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
405,914.80 400,000.00 19,759.67 400,000.00 09/20/2309/18/23A1A+ 400,000.00 63873QP65 5.61
CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
592,486.26 590,000.00 13,807.97 590,000.00 02/05/2402/01/24A1A+ 590,000.00 22536DWD6 4.76
33,567.64 998,401.06 990,000.00 5.11 990,000.00 990,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Account Page 14PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 81
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Bank Note
WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
883,678.25 874,821.75 23,048.96 874,475.00 08/09/2308/03/23Aa2A+ 875,000.00 94988J6D4 5.47
23,048.96 883,678.25 874,821.75 5.47 874,475.00 875,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
4,105.75 4,110.09 4.06 4,109.97 03/16/2203/09/22NRAAA 4,110.13 448977AD0 2.22
HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
235,572.55 235,349.56 319.70 235,342.77 08/21/2408/09/24AaaNR 235,361.19 43813YAB8 4.89
WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
23,876.83 23,872.24 53.58 23,871.38 02/14/2402/06/24NRAAA 23,873.25 98164RAB2 5.05
NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
114,917.59 114,048.21 300.62 114,039.42 10/25/2310/18/23AaaNR 114,062.58 65480MAD5 5.94
HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
75,674.93 74,991.43 118.13 74,986.79 11/08/2311/01/23AaaNR 75,000.00 438123AC5 5.67
KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
354,828.95 353,593.89 818.22 354,060.55 02/12/2502/11/25AaaNR 350,000.00 50117DAC0 4.92
TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
241,627.68 240,000.00 520.53 239,999.86 07/30/2407/23/24NRAAA 240,000.00 89237QAD2 4.88
HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
200,253.00 199,988.16 392.00 199,985.36 10/16/2410/08/24NRAAA 200,000.00 448976AD2 4.41
BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
505,902.00 499,979.30 1,095.56 499,971.95 06/13/2406/06/24AaaAAA 500,000.00 05522RDJ4 4.93
HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
500,307.50 498,152.99 962.22 497,929.69 01/31/2501/30/25AaaAAA 500,000.00 43816DAC9 4.44
AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
347,608.20 344,987.56 713.00 344,984.34 07/23/2407/16/24NRAAA 345,000.00 02589BAE0 4.65
GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
160,177.28 159,973.98 293.33 159,969.18 10/16/2410/08/24AaaAAA 160,000.00 38014AAD3 4.40
Account Page 15PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 82
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
376,097.63 374,988.90 515.63 374,987.25 03/25/2503/18/25AaaNR 375,000.00 92868MAD1 4.50
BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
296,194.75 294,974.39 224.20 294,970.94 02/12/2502/04/25AaaAAA 295,000.00 096924AD7 4.56
HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
124,784.25 124,987.00 230.56 124,986.04 05/08/2504/29/25AaaNR 125,000.00 437921AD1 4.15
WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
280,463.68 279,964.50 533.87 279,958.39 10/24/2410/17/24AaaAAA 280,000.00 92970QAE5 4.29
FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
454,504.96 454,959.93 899.89 454,955.77 03/25/2503/18/25AaaAAA 455,000.00 34535KAD0 4.45
BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
85,099.28 84,994.67 112.98 84,994.14 05/12/2505/06/25AaaNR 85,000.00 05594BAD8 4.35
MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
267,423.43 264,949.85 562.98 264,943.63 01/23/2501/14/25AaaNR 265,000.00 58773DAD6 4.78
VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
455,246.61 454,982.90 627.02 454,980.44 03/31/2503/25/25AaaNR 455,000.00 92348KDY6 4.51
AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
416,127.97 414,992.94 789.42 414,992.49 05/13/2505/06/25NRAAA 415,000.00 02582JKP4 4.28
GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
100,040.80 99,985.95 178.33 99,985.28 05/14/2505/06/25AaaAAA 100,000.00 362549AD9 4.28
WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
546,491.12 544,992.94 1,051.24 544,990.95 06/10/2506/03/25NRAAA 545,000.00 92970QAJ4 4.34
AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
341,091.74 339,951.52 365.50 339,951.01 07/22/2507/15/25NRAAA 340,000.00 02582JKV1 4.30
11,682.57 6,508,418.48 6,483,772.90 4.58 6,483,947.59 6,482,407.16 Security Type Sub-Total
66,265,286.98 64,367,572.93 4.24 436,590.32 65,147,517.21 65,388,392.51 Managed Account Sub-Total
Account Page 16PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 83
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
$66,265,286.98 $64,367,572.93 $436,590.32 $65,147,517.21 $65,388,392.51 4.24%
$65,824,982.83
$436,590.32
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account Page 17PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 84
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(3,084.54)(673.78) 121,298.88 97.04 WellsFar 125,000.00 91282CCJ8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
4.12 0.89
(1,037.37) 12,838.09 509,455.28 97.04 WellsFar 525,000.00 91282CCJ8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
4.12 0.89
(12,211.22) 34,101.56 973,125.00 97.31 BOFAML 1,000,000.00 9128282A7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2016 1.500% 08/15/2026
4.15 1.01
(23,317.42) 65,214.84 1,444,687.50 96.31 Nomura 1,500,000.00 91282CCZ2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
4.12 1.14
(2.24) 4,203.11 192,757.80 96.38 BMO 200,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
(10,874.04)(9,820.72) 298,774.59 96.38 MorganSt 310,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
(34,683.93)(30,156.31) 963,789.00 96.38 Citigrou 1,000,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
4.10 1.22
4,800.89 8,535.41 574,483.65 99.91 Nomura 575,000.00 91282CJT9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
4.04 1.40
437.11 1,265.05 924,169.35 99.91 MorganSt 925,000.00 91282CJT9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
4.04 1.40
1,803.75 2,171.57 695,624.11 100.09 MorganSt 695,000.00 91282CMH1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.125% 01/31/2027
4.04 1.44
(13,773.29)(4,566.19) 681,488.50 97.36 BOFAML 700,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
4.02 1.47
3,938.13 45,554.73 669,347.70 95.62 BMO 700,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
4.00 1.53
(92.19)(187.44) 301,089.90 100.36 WellsFar 300,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.99 1.52
1,685.71 1,726.65 426,544.03 100.36 WellsFar 425,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.99 1.52
1,852.92 7,820.45 534,789.20 97.23 WellsFar 550,000.00 912828X88US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3.97 1.71
(825.01) 12,890.50 488,515.50 97.70 BMO 500,000.00 91282CFB2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
3.95 1.92
983.98 8,472.58 278,109.30 92.70 BOFAML 300,000.00 91282CAL5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2020 0.375% 09/30/2027
3.92 2.11
Account Page 18PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 85
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(3,825.08)(5,843.53) 426,726.78 100.41 WellsFar 425,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3.92 2.02
(1,861.69) 37,695.19 463,515.50 92.70 BOFAML 500,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.92 2.19
4,065.41 21,249.80 741,624.80 92.70 Citigrou 800,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.92 2.19
1,286.11 1,454.73 140,585.20 100.42 WellsFar 140,000.00 91282CLX7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
3.92 2.15
(7,080.87) 18,014.85 794,965.05 96.36 Citigrou 825,000.00 9128283F5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3.92 2.19
11,044.24 61,456.37 763,447.58 92.54 BMO 825,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
3.91 2.43
(14,211.96)(1,640.88) 972,031.00 97.20 BMO 1,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.91 2.39
1,571.08 18,316.27 280,019.40 93.34 JPMorgan 300,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.90 2.56
8,275.84 36,777.12 466,699.00 93.34 BOFAML 500,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.90 2.56
1,572.54 2,317.35 521,411.10 99.32 WellsFar 525,000.00 91282CGT2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
3.89 2.48
(3,734.58) 28,260.05 605,541.30 93.16 BMO 650,000.00 91282CBZ3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3.89 2.64
12,661.59 53,523.77 719,085.30 92.79 MorganSt 775,000.00 91282CCH2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3.89 2.81
543.86 31,633.56 666,235.12 91.89 WellsFar 725,000.00 91282CCR0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 1.000% 07/31/2028
3.89 2.90
10,541.83 5,665.56 1,000,863.22 102.13 BOFAML 980,000.00 91282CJA0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
3.90 2.88
(1,622.84)(10,855.29) 720,453.30 102.92 Citigrou 700,000.00 91282CJF9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
3.90 2.95
6,566.55 16,613.07 693,026.74 97.61 BMO 710,000.00 9128285M8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
3.90 3.07
21,836.37 32,361.72 1,566,879.30 99.48 BMO 1,575,000.00 91282CJR3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
3.90 3.16
Account Page 19PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 86
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
4,569.66 11,655.20 255,792.90 93.02 BMO 275,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.90 3.34
(2,429.71) 12,847.52 511,585.80 93.02 Nomura 550,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.90 3.34
28,694.89 54,436.60 1,221,559.65 95.81 BOFAML 1,275,000.00 9128286B1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
3.90 3.29
20,068.09 43,546.42 1,137,280.80 94.77 Citigrou 1,200,000.00 91282CEE7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
3.91 3.43
3,421.06 6,034.10 178,344.26 96.40 BMO 185,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.91 3.48
(1,184.71) 7,265.19 964,023.00 96.40 BOFAML 1,000,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.91 3.48
(2,884.59)(2,084.05) 268,339.78 97.58 Nomura 275,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.92 3.62
(3,048.29)(1,005.01) 512,285.03 97.58 BOFAML 525,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.92 3.62
43.20 656.27 333,361.35 95.25 WellsFar 350,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.92 3.74
(7,230.50)(4,172.63) 466,705.89 95.25 Nomura 490,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.92 3.74
(3,084.12)(3,116.99) 523,892.78 99.79 BOFAML 525,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.93 3.76
6,131.27 7,324.46 623,681.88 99.79 BOFAML 625,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.93 3.76
5,685.89 5,610.52 381,460.13 101.72 Nomura 375,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.94 3.97
11,450.56 11,401.47 701,886.63 101.72 MorganSt 690,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.94 3.97
4,879.43 6,772.12 966,993.21 98.17 Citigrou 985,000.00 91282CGJ4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
3.95 4.12
623.09 718.71 113,373.79 98.59 WellsFar 115,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.96 4.20
2,839.89 3,262.38 315,474.88 98.59 WellsFar 320,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.96 4.20
Account Page 20PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 87
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(860.48)(1,004.66) 696,411.55 100.20 Nomura 695,000.00 91282CMU2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
3.95 4.16
2,326.15 2,531.21 594,398.40 99.07 BMO 600,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.97 4.35
669,068.64 3.96 33,240.42 32,388,010.69 33,340,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.60
Municipal Bond / Note
1,221.91 1,221.91 146,221.91 100.84 RaymondJ 145,000.00 544647KY5LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
4.12 2.69
1,918.70 1,918.70 176,918.70 101.10 Barclays 175,000.00 20772KZK8CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
4.17 3.28
3,140.61 4.15 3,140.61 323,140.61 320,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.01
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
2,234.06 11,240.29 305,740.29 98.63 Barclays 310,000.00 3137BUX60FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
4.33 1.29
3,882.80 14,859.75 342,670.30 97.91 TD Secur 350,000.00 3137FAWS3FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
4.24 1.83
1,898.64 1,904.72 596,748.40 100.32 JPMorgan 594,858.54 3137HAD45FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
4.44 1.78
6,675.23 6,464.77 606,980.40 101.16 SAN 600,000.00 3137HACX2FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
4.27 2.57
9,610.57 18,029.32 569,696.62 99.42 JPMorgan 573,021.29 3136BQDE6FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
4.32 2.70
13,916.09 17,985.55 555,920.75 101.08 BMO 550,000.00 3137HAQ74FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
4.26 2.74
11,141.95 14,250.00 605,374.20 100.90 WellsFar 600,000.00 3137HAMH6FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
4.23 2.71
16,491.06 21,007.80 456,660.45 101.48 MorganSt 450,000.00 3137HAST4FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
4.24 2.82
4,913.84 5,114.12 224,478.10 102.04 JPMorgan 220,000.00 3137HB3D4FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
4.28 2.84
Account Page 21PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 88
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
5,293.55 5,578.88 324,659.52 101.46 BOFAML 320,000.00 3137HB3G7FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
4.28 2.88
(220.61)(1,032.69) 291,867.02 100.64 JPMorgan 290,000.00 3137HBLV4FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
4.28 2.97
5,734.80 5,142.81 308,013.90 102.67 WellsFar 300,000.00 3137HCKV3FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
4.29 3.22
(2,375.32)(3,092.34) 216,203.36 100.56 BOFAML 215,000.00 3137HFNZ4FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.56
(2,103.58)(3,400.85) 429,025.60 100.95 MorganSt 425,000.00 3137HFF59FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.54
(476.82)(1,388.75) 553,755.95 100.68 BMO 550,000.00 3137HDXL9FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
4.30 3.55
(488.07)(1,535.40) 365,659.92 101.57 MorganSt 360,000.00 3137HH6C0FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
4.31 3.65
6,662.93 6,312.95 604,411.12 101.58 JPMorgan 595,000.00 3137HHJL6FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
4.32 3.67
354.19 354.69 210,347.34 100.17 JPMorgan 210,000.00 3137HKXJ8FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
4.33 3.97
877.06 878.04 360,874.08 100.24 MorganSt 360,000.00 3137HKPF5FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
4.33 4.05
(909.97)(909.19) 589,079.60 99.84 GoldmanS 590,000.00 3137HMC65FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
4.33 4.29
(1,335.87)(1,342.00) 398,236.40 99.56 JPMorgan 400,000.00 3137HMCE8FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4.34 4.37
(2,479.77)(2,479.77) 506,790.42 99.37 BOFAML 510,000.00 3137HMCK4FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290%
07/01/2030
4.30 4.35
113,942.70 4.30 79,296.76 9,423,193.74 9,372,879.83 Security Type Sub-Total 3.14
Federal Agency Bond / Note
890.85 945.50 620,120.90 100.02 Nomura 620,000.00 3130B6R24FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3.93 1.75
945.50 3.93 890.85 620,120.90 620,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.75
Account Page 22PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 89
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(4,021.66)(18,530.85) 168,583.05 99.17 JPMorgan 170,000.00 172967KN0CITIGROUP INC
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
4.53 0.72
(3,043.22)(2,844.16) 106,911.64 97.19 JPMorgan 110,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
4.37 0.86
(2,346.91) 14,676.00 242,981.00 97.19 JANE 250,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
4.37 0.86
1,811.50 11,508.53 222,171.53 98.74 SEEL 225,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.43 0.96
1,704.94 1,622.61 216,743.01 100.81 07/03/26JPMorgan 215,000.00 857477CD3STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2023 5.272% 08/03/2026
4.42 0.88
(6,384.76)(4,137.40) 192,936.60 96.47 RBC Capi 200,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
4.61 1.07
(2,597.49) 9,735.08 217,493.33 96.66 10/04/26JANE 225,000.00 025816CM9AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/04/2021 1.650% 11/04/2026
4.41 1.22
2,058.71 2,088.94 157,034.69 101.31 10/13/26MIZU 155,000.00 63743HFK3NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
4.53 1.15
(6,859.17)(6,057.40) 192,814.60 96.41 JPMorgan 200,000.00 24422EWA3JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
4.26 1.40
3,344.81 6,574.75 351,048.25 100.30 01/20/26JPMorgan 350,000.00 06051GLE7BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
5.28 0.46
836.16 9,772.28 431,256.83 99.14 01/26/26MorganSt 435,000.00 38141GWB6GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
4.43 1.17
(2,660.11) 202.25 121,036.00 96.83 01/09/27Deutsche 125,000.00 459200KM2IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/09/2022 2.200% 02/09/2027
4.36 1.45
596.82 13,934.25 269,266.25 97.92 03/02/26GoldmanS 275,000.00 89788MAD4TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
4.96 0.57
(3,652.42) 6,609.30 291,339.30 97.11 02/03/27CSFirstB 300,000.00 808513BY0CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
4.32 1.51
(3,417.69)(7,008.40) 398,475.60 99.62 04/10/27Deutsche 400,000.00 665859AW4NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
4.22 1.63
(709.43)(686.92) 64,277.98 98.89 04/15/27BOFAML 65,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
4.34 1.66
Account Page 23PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 90
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(3,861.66)(5,872.00) 247,223.00 98.89 04/15/27MAXE 250,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
4.34 1.66
(4,163.64)(1,523.22) 269,241.78 97.91 04/19/27JANE 275,000.00 693475AT2PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
4.36 1.69
(1,099.32) 1,078.80 397,610.80 99.40 JPMorgan 400,000.00 63254ABE7NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
4.22 1.76
(1,542.40) 13,251.74 178,352.24 93.87 06/03/27JANE 190,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.34 1.93
3,129.78 24,233.20 187,739.20 93.87 06/03/27GoldmanS 200,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.34 1.93
4,356.16 7,087.95 452,286.45 100.51 Citigrou 450,000.00 89236TKJ3TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
4.30 1.98
(34.92) 13,224.00 388,656.00 97.16 08/03/27MorganSt 400,000.00 882508BC7TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
4.22 2.09
841.78 (8,818.32) 434,354.68 102.20 10/15/27TD Secur 425,000.00 20030NEA5COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
4.32 2.06
1,701.13 247.20 302,938.20 100.98 11/01/27RBC Capi 300,000.00 023135CP9AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/01/2022 4.550% 12/01/2027
4.11 2.13
1,222.82 1,230.12 91,177.92 101.31 02/01/28JPMorgan 90,000.00 478160DH4JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
4.01 2.32
3,595.73 3,098.71 239,334.81 101.84 04/13/27JANE 235,000.00 61747YFP5MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
4.80 1.58
2,059.94 1,909.18 132,287.48 101.76 04/22/27MAXE 130,000.00 46647PEE2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
4.78 1.61
50.34 69.01 184,832.21 99.91 04/01/28MUFG 185,000.00 17252MAR1CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
4.23 2.50
(894.09)(2,816.90) 426,411.85 100.33 04/04/28GoldmanS 425,000.00 427866BH0HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
4.11 2.51
44.44 45.96 30,024.96 100.08 04/09/28JPMorgan 30,000.00 231021AY2CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
4.21 2.52
5,382.39 5,017.50 455,854.50 101.30 04/15/28JPMorgan 450,000.00 30303M8L9META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
4.08 2.52
1,251.36 2,769.25 474,316.00 99.86 04/17/28Citigrou 475,000.00 58933YBH7MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
4.10 2.55
Account Page 24PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 91
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
2,121.86 2,120.14 462,156.94 100.47 HSBC 460,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.47 2.61
6,311.59 6,870.30 305,514.30 101.84 GoldmanS 300,000.00 02665WEM9AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
4.45 2.69
9,911.86 11,900.25 456,833.25 101.52 07/11/28Barclays 450,000.00 05565ECE3BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
4.51 2.67
25,734.75 26,685.18 598,833.18 104.14 08/29/28GoldmanS 575,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
4.38 2.77
5,233.77 5,086.02 375,604.02 101.51 MIZU 370,000.00 21688ABC5COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
4.33 3.14
2,182.60 2,182.60 202,182.60 101.09 01/24/28JPMorgan 200,000.00 46647PEU6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
4.65 2.32
5,365.44 5,390.82 275,296.32 101.96 01/26/29Citigrou 270,000.00 17275RBR2CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
4.25 3.15
600.91 646.10 95,388.65 100.41 BOFAML 95,000.00 14913UAQ3CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
4.28 3.60
13,354.51 13,423.26 472,719.46 102.77 12/17/29BOFAML 460,000.00 00724PAJ8ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
4.27 3.93
2,245.98 2,260.72 112,092.42 101.90 01/07/30RBC Capi 110,000.00 63743HFX5NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
4.48 3.89
4,840.84 4,964.00 253,534.00 101.41 01/07/30UBSS 250,000.00 713448GB8PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
4.25 3.93
3,561.24 3,488.70 304,409.70 101.47 01/24/30TD Secur 300,000.00 427866BL1HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
4.39 3.96
1,552.77 1,563.68 146,407.08 100.97 02/01/30BOFAML 145,000.00 571676AY1MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
4.58 3.97
2,261.71 2,261.71 147,261.71 101.56 03/24/30MorganSt 145,000.00 857477DB6STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
4.48 4.11
1,003.96 1,017.39 165,731.94 100.44 03/28/30BOFAML 165,000.00 931142FN8WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
4.24 4.17
157.34 815.85 413,564.85 91.90 01/30/30JANE 450,000.00 09247XAQ4BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
4.30 4.35
(290.99)(286.01) 184,615.94 99.79 04/01/30Citigrou 185,000.00 194162AT0COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
4.26 4.19
Account Page 25PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 92
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
5,670.71 5,682.43 480,387.93 101.13 04/20/30BOFAML 475,000.00 637639AQ8NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
4.43 4.19
3,882.75 3,882.75 253,882.75 101.55 04/29/30Citigrou 250,000.00 17325FBP2CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
4.55 4.19
191,646.93 4.38 82,403.52 14,243,428.78 14,265,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.39
Certificate of Deposit
5,914.80 5,914.80 405,914.80 101.48 WellsFar 400,000.00 63873QP65NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
4.19 1.06
2,486.26 2,486.26 592,486.26 100.42 CRAG 590,000.00 22536DWD6CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
4.38 1.42
8,401.06 4.30 8,401.06 998,401.06 990,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.27
Bank Note
8,856.50 9,203.25 883,678.25 100.99 07/07/26BOFAML 875,000.00 94988J6D4WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
4.41 0.88
9,203.25 4.41 8,856.50 883,678.25 875,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.88
Asset-Backed Security
(4.34)(4.22) 4,105.75 99.89 BOFAML 4,110.13 448977AD0HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
4.51 0.04
222.99 229.78 235,572.55 100.09 JPMorgan 235,361.19 43813YAB8HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
4.57 0.31
4.59 5.45 23,876.83 100.02 MIZU 23,873.25 98164RAB2WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
4.53 0.08
869.38 878.17 114,917.59 100.75 MIZU 114,062.58 65480MAD5NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
4.67 0.58
683.50 688.14 75,674.93 100.90 JPMorgan 75,000.00 438123AC5HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
4.61 0.82
1,235.06 768.40 354,828.95 101.38 WellsFar 350,000.00 50117DAC0KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
4.42 1.56
Account Page 26PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 93
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
1,627.68 1,627.82 241,627.68 100.68 MUFG 240,000.00 89237QAD2TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
4.38 1.25
264.84 267.64 200,253.00 100.13 Barclays 200,000.00 448976AD2HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
4.35 1.55
5,922.70 5,930.05 505,902.00 101.18 BOFAML 500,000.00 05522RDJ4BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
4.26 1.67
2,154.51 2,377.81 500,307.50 100.06 BOFAML 500,000.00 43816DAC9HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
4.31 1.38
2,620.64 2,623.86 347,608.20 100.76 Citigrou 345,000.00 02589BAE0AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
4.26 1.83
203.30 208.10 160,177.28 100.11 MIZU 160,000.00 38014AAD3GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
4.33 1.31
1,108.73 1,110.38 376,097.63 100.29 Barclays 375,000.00 92868MAD1VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
4.36 1.92
1,220.36 1,223.81 296,194.75 100.41 WellsFar 295,000.00 096924AD7BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
4.32 1.56
(202.75)(201.79) 124,784.25 99.83 JPMorgan 125,000.00 437921AD1HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
4.25 2.07
499.18 505.29 280,463.68 100.17 WellsFar 280,000.00 92970QAE5WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
4.22 2.06
(454.97)(450.81) 454,504.96 99.89 SGAS 455,000.00 34535KAD0FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
4.52 1.96
104.61 105.14 85,099.28 100.12 BOFAML 85,000.00 05594BAD8BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
4.30 1.88
2,473.58 2,479.80 267,423.43 100.91 SGAS 265,000.00 58773DAD6MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
4.32 1.88
263.71 266.17 455,246.61 100.05 BOFAML 455,000.00 92348KDY6VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
4.55 2.06
1,135.03 1,135.48 416,127.97 100.27 RBC Capi 415,000.00 02582JKP4AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
4.19 2.50
54.85 55.52 100,040.80 100.04 TD Secur 100,000.00 362549AD9GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
4.27 2.06
1,498.18 1,500.17 546,491.12 100.27 WellsFar 545,000.00 92970QAJ4WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
4.25 2.57
Account Page 27PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 94
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDate PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
1,140.22 1,140.73 341,091.74 100.32 Barclays 340,000.00 02582JKV1AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
4.20 2.72
24,470.89 4.34 24,645.58 6,508,418.48 6,482,407.16 Security Type Sub-Total 1.82
66,265,286.98 65,388,392.51 1,020,819.58 240,875.30 4.15 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.51
Total Investments $65,824,982.83
$436,590.32
$65,388,392.51
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $66,265,286.98 $1,020,819.58 $240,875.30 4.15% 2.51
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account Page 28PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 95
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
07/03/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
91282CFL0 (527,009.77)(5,224.90)(532,234.67) 525,000.00 07/01/25
07/17/25 FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3137HMC65 (589,988.79)(1,135.16)(591,123.95) 590,000.00 07/09/25
07/22/25 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
02582JKV1 (339,951.01) 0.00 (339,951.01) 340,000.00 07/15/25
07/31/25 FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
3137HMCE8 (399,578.40)(1,422.00)(401,000.40) 400,000.00 07/22/25
08/07/25 FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290%
07/01/2030
3137HMCK4 (509,270.19)(364.65)(509,634.84) 510,000.00 07/29/25
(8,146.71) (2,373,944.87)(2,365,798.16) 2,365,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
07/25/25 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 0.00 2,376.03 2,376.03 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 0.00 881.69 881.69 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 0.00 2,082.21 2,082.21 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 0.00 2,172.50 2,172.50 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
3137HKXJ8 0.00 771.75 771.75 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3137FAWS3 0.00 931.58 931.58 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 0.00 1,296.00 1,296.00 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 0.00 2,409.50 2,409.50 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3137HCKV3 0.00 1,295.00 1,295.00 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 0.00 929.32 929.32 07/01/25
Account Page 29PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 96
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/25/25 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 0.00 2,325.00 2,325.00 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 0.00 1,818.75 1,818.75 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 0.00 2,370.81 2,370.81 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 0.00 1,437.30 1,437.30 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
3137HFNZ4 0.00 807.68 807.68 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3137HFF59 0.00 1,635.54 1,635.54 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
3137HKPF5 0.00 1,329.00 1,329.00 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 0.00 1,104.90 1,104.90 07/01/25
07/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 0.00 1,996.96 1,996.96 07/01/25
07/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
MONEY0002 0.00 423.51 423.51 07/02/25
07/07/25 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
02665WEM9 0.00 7,687.50 7,687.50 07/07/25
07/09/25 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
21688ABC5 0.00 8,880.00 8,880.00 07/09/25
07/11/25 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
24422EWA3 0.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 07/11/25
07/15/25 HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
448977AD0 0.00 18.71 18.71 07/15/25
07/15/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
91282CJT9 0.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
50117DAC0 0.00 1,534.17 1,534.17 07/15/25
07/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
02582JKP4 0.00 1,480.17 1,480.17 07/15/25
Account Page 30PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 97
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/15/25 WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
92970QAJ4 0.00 2,299.60 2,299.60 07/15/25
07/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
34535KAD0 0.00 1,687.29 1,687.29 07/15/25
07/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
437921AD1 0.00 432.29 432.29 07/15/25
07/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
92970QAE5 0.00 1,001.00 1,001.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
89237QAD2 0.00 976.00 976.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
58773DAD6 0.00 1,055.58 1,055.58 07/15/25
07/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
05522RDJ4 0.00 2,054.17 2,054.17 07/15/25
07/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 0.00 145.91 145.91 07/15/25
07/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
43816DAC9 0.00 1,804.17 1,804.17 07/15/25
07/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
02589BAE0 0.00 1,336.88 1,336.88 07/15/25
07/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 0.00 593.00 593.00 07/15/25
07/15/25 HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
448976AD2 0.00 735.00 735.00 07/15/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 0.00 356.67 356.67 07/16/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3
DTD 01/19/2022 1.260% 11/16/2026
380146AC4 0.00 1.94 1.94 07/16/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
38014AAD3 0.00 586.67 586.67 07/16/25
07/17/25 ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
00724PAJ8 0.00 11,385.00 11,385.00 07/17/25
07/20/25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
06051GLE7 0.00 8,890.00 8,890.00 07/20/25
Account Page 31PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 98
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
05594BAD8 0.00 308.13 308.13 07/20/25
07/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
92348KDY6 0.00 1,710.04 1,710.04 07/20/25
07/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
92868MAD1 0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25 07/20/25
07/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 0.00 1,098.26 1,098.26 07/21/25
07/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 0.00 354.38 354.38 07/21/25
07/24/25 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
46647PEU6 0.00 4,915.00 4,915.00 07/24/25
07/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
096924AD7 0.00 1,121.00 1,121.00 07/25/25
07/26/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
38141GWB6 0.00 8,373.75 8,373.75 07/26/25
07/27/25 MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
61761J3R8 0.00 3,515.63 3,515.63 07/27/25
07/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 0.00 110.75 110.75 07/30/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 1.000% 07/31/2028
91282CCR0 0.00 3,625.00 3,625.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
91282CGJ4 0.00 17,237.50 17,237.50 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
91282CFC0 0.00 11,025.00 11,025.00 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
91282CDW8 0.00 7,218.75 7,218.75 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.125% 01/31/2027
91282CMH1 0.00 14,334.38 14,334.38 07/31/25
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
91282CFB2 0.00 6,875.00 6,875.00 07/31/25
Account Page 32PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 99
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
07/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 0.00 3,093.75 3,093.75 07/31/25
203,359.32 203,359.32 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
MATURITY
07/30/25 MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
58404DHQ7 245,000.00 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 0.00 245,000.00 07/30/25
0.00 0.00 0.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
PAYDOWNS
07/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 60.20 0.00 60.20 2.25 1.40 60.20 07/01/25
07/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 698.10 0.00 698.10 0.02 0.01 698.10 07/01/25
07/15/25 HART 2022-A A3
DTD 03/16/2022 2.220% 10/15/2026
448977AD0 6,003.42 0.00 6,003.42 0.23 0.06 6,003.42 07/15/25
07/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 5,937.42 0.00 5,937.42 1.20 0.76 5,937.42 07/15/25
07/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 10,797.81 0.00 10,797.81 0.85 0.47 10,797.81 07/15/25
07/16/25 GMCAR 2022-1 A3
DTD 01/19/2022 1.260% 11/16/2026
380146AC4 1,847.36 0.00 1,847.36 0.16 0.04 1,847.36 07/16/25
07/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 34,151.65 0.00 34,151.65 2.67 1.72 34,151.65 07/21/25
0.00 4.46 7.38 59,495.96 59,495.96 59,495.96 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
07/11/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 427,639.65 4,885.76 432,525.41 (8,848.63)(3,161.72)FIFO 425,000.00 07/09/25
07/11/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 176,086.91 2,011.78 178,098.69 (2,030.28)(1,257.38)FIFO 175,000.00 07/09/25
Account Page 33PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 100
For the Month Ending July 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS -
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
SELL
07/22/25 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2023 5.272% 08/03/2026
857477CD3 226,955.25 5,568.55 232,523.80 1,829.25 1,914.33 FIFO 225,000.00 07/21/25
07/23/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
91282CCJ8 388,281.25 218.75 388,500.00 (2,031.25)(9,692.37)FIFO 400,000.00 07/22/25
07/30/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 0.875% 06/30/2026
91282CCJ8 72,820.31 53.50 72,873.81 (363.28)(1,807.52)FIFO 75,000.00 07/29/25
12,738.34 (14,004.66)(11,444.19) 1,304,521.71 1,291,783.37 1,300,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(769,518.83) 207,950.95 (561,567.88) (11,436.81) (14,000.20)Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions ($11,436.81)($561,567.88)$207,950.95 ($769,518.83)($14,000.20)
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account Page 34PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 101
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
SUBJECT:Consideration of Reappointment of Planning Commissioners to Four-
Year Terms. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the reappointment of current Planning
Commissioners Al Boling, Bryan Dopp and Tony Morales to four-year terms, effective January 1,
2026, through December 31, 2029.
BACKGROUND:
Planning Commissioners Boling, Dopp and Morales will be completing their current four-year term
on the Planning Commission on December 31, 2025. Each commissioner is willing and
committed to continue serving. Their reappointments are recommended based on their exemplary
service and meaningful contributions to the planning process during their current terms.
ANALYSIS:
All three Commissioners have shown strong commitment to the Council’s mission, vision and core
values and the long-term planning goals of the city. Their tenure on the Commission has been
marked by consistent attendance, active participation in meetings, and a solid grasp of the City’s
General Plan, zoning regulations, and broader planning principles.
Each Commissioner has shown a clear dedication to professional development by attending
relevant training sessions and conferences, including Congress for the New Urbanism, California
Chapter APA events, and League of California Cities sessions geared toward Planning
Commissioners. This ongoing education ensures they remain informed on best practices and
emerging trends in land use and urban planning.
In addition to their technical knowledge, the Commissioners have conducted themselves with
professionalism and fairness, contributing to thoughtful, balanced decision-making on a wide
range of development proposals and policy matters. Their respectful engagement with staff,
applicants, fellow Commissioners, and the public has fostered trust and transparency in the
Commission’s work. Their reappointment would preserve valuable institutional knowledge and
support continuity in Commission operations as the city continues to manage important growth
and development challenges.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Page 102
Page 2
3
0
2
1
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This action addresses the City Council’s core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating
our future. By reappointing these three Commissioners the City Council is reinforcing its
dedication to long-term, strategic planning, ensuring that the Planning Commission remains
equipped with individuals who understand the City’s development history and are committed to
stewardship of the City’s vision.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 103
Page 1 of 1
REVISION:
Attached is a revised staff report for item D5 on the Consent Calendar highlighting a change in
the recommendation to reflect the correct commissioners whose terms are ending and are
interested in reappointment. Commissioner Bryan Dopp was mistakenly named as a Planning
Commissioner up for reappointment instead of Commissioner James Daniels. Commissioner
Dopp’s term does not end until December 31, 2027 and will continue to serve. Commissioner
Daniels term ends on December 31, 2025 and has expressed interest in reappointment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the reappointment of current Planning
Commissioners Al Boling, James Daniels and Tony Morales to four-year terms, effective January
1, 2026, through December 31, 2029.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Revised Staff Report
DATE: September 2, 2025
TO: John R. Gillison, City Manager
FROM: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Consideration of Reappointment of Planning Commissioners to Four-Year
Terms (CITY)
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department
Corrected Staff Report Memo: 9/3/25 Item D5 Consent Calendar
DATE: September 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Consideration of Reappointment of Planning Commissioners to Four-
Year Terms (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the reappointment of current Planning
Commissioners Al Boling, James Daniels and Tony Morales to four-year terms, effective January
1, 2026, through December 31, 2029.
BACKGROUND:
Planning Commissioners Boling, Daniels and Morales will be completing their current four-year
term on the Planning Commission on December 31, 2025. Each commissioner is willing and
committed to continue serving. Their reappointments are recommended based on their exemplary
service and meaningful contributions to the planning process during their current terms.
ANALYSIS:
All three Commissioners have shown strong commitment to the Council’s mission, vision and core
values and the long-term planning goals of the city. Their tenure on the Commission has been
marked by consistent attendance, active participation in meetings, and a solid grasp of the City’s
General Plan, zoning regulations, and broader planning principles.
Each Commissioner has shown a clear dedication to professional development by attending
relevant training sessions and conferences, including Congress for the New Urbanism, California
Chapter APA events, and League of California Cities sessions geared toward Planning
Commissioners. This ongoing education ensures they remain informed on best practices and
emerging trends in land use and urban planning.
In addition to their technical knowledge, the Commissioners have conducted themselves with
professionalism and fairness, contributing to thoughtful, balanced decision-making on a wide
range of development proposals and policy matters. Their respectful engagement with staff,
applicants, fellow Commissioners, and the public has fostered trust and transparency in the
Commission’s work. Their reappointment would preserve valuable institutional knowledge and
support continuity in Commission operations as the city continues to manage important growth
and development challenges.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment 1
Page 2
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This action addresses the City Council’s core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating
our future. By reappointing these three Commissioners the City Council is reinforcing its
dedication to long-term, strategic planning, ensuring that the Planning Commission remains
equipped with individuals who understand the City’s development history and are committed to
stewardship of the City’s vision.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director
Richard Favela, Public Works Services Superintendent
Jason Martin, Public Works Streets Supervisor
Lisa O'Brien, Public Works Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Transfer of Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000
from General Fund to Measure I Fund for Street Striping and Pavement
Marking. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve a transfer of $150,000 from the City’s General Fund
to the Measure I Fund for expenses related to Street Striping and Pavement Marking.
BACKGROUND:
During the development of the FY 2025/2026 Budget, appropriations for street striping and
pavement marking were budgeted in the General Fund. These costs are eligible for Measure I
funding and are recommended to be transferred to the Measure I fund for budgetary alignment.
This action does not increase total appropriations.
ANALYSIS:
Measure I is a countywide half-cent sales tax approved by San Bernardino County voters to fund
transportation improvements. Consistent with the intended use of these revenues, the Measure I
Fund (F177) is the appropriate funding source for street striping and pavement marking activities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project was included in the FY 2025/26 Budget, and no additional appropriations are
requested at this time. This action transfers $150,000 in appropriations from the General Fund to
the Measure I Fund to align budgeted costs with the appropriate funding source as described
below:
Transfer of Appropriation Request
General Fund
F001 | CC318 | SC2106
-$150,000 (Decrease of Appropriation)
Measure I Fund
F177 | CC318 | SC2106
+$150,000 (Increase of Appropriation)
Net Budget Impact $0
Page 104
Page 2
3
0
1
2
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s core value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all by ensuring City roads are properly maintained.
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A
Page 105
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Michael J. Smith, Chief of Police
Mauricio Hurtado, Administrative Lieutenant
Cinthia Barboza, Sheriff's Service Specialist
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $40,457 from the
Homeland Security Grant for the Purchase of Eight Ballistic Shields
Through a Competitive Bid. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $40,457
from the Homeland Security Fiscal Year 2023 Grant fund for the purchase of Ballistic Shields to
enhance officer and public safety.
BACKGROUND:
The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department continually evaluates tactical equipment to ensure
officer and public safety during critical incidents, such as active shooter events, barricaded
suspects, or high-risk warrant service. Ballistic shields are essential in providing officers with
increased protection, especially during encounters involving armed suspects. The current
inventory of ballistic shields is limited and in need of modernization to meet current safety
standards.
ANALYSIS:
Modern ballistic shields provide enhanced ballistic protection, improved mobility, and visibility
features that support tactical operations in dynamic and high-risk environments. The addition of
this equipment will significantly enhance officer safety and operational effectiveness, especially
during high-threat scenarios that require immediate response and protection.
The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department will initiate a formal procurement process in
accordance with Homeland Security Grant requirements and the City’s purchasing policies to
select a qualified vendor. Upon completion of the bidding process, a contract will be awarded to
the vendor that best meets the operational needs and specifications for the ballistic shield
purchase.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will appropriate Homeland Security Grant funds from Fiscal Year 2023 in the amount
of $40,457 to the 2025/2026 budget. These funds will be used for the purchase of a ballistic shield
to enhance officers and public safety.
$40,457-F380 CC701 SC702 (Capital Outlay-Equipment)
Page 106
Page 2
2
9
9
8
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The upcoming project supports key Council Core Values from the 2025–2026 Strategic Plan. It
promotes a safe and healthy community for all and helps build a resilient, prepared city.
Additionally, it emphasizes delivering exceptional public service with accountability and integrity.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 107
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Award of Professional Services Agreements for Five-
Year On-Call Contracts for Various Disciplines for Fiscal Years 2025/26
through 2029/30. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council and Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District:
1. Enter into Professional Services Agreements (PSAs) with Engineering Resources of
Southern California (ERSC), Fuscoe Engineering Inc. (Fuscoe Engineering), GIS
Surveyors, Inc. (GIS Surveyors), NV5, Rick Engineering Company (Rick Engineering),
Towill, Inc. (Towill), and Westland Group, Inc. (Westland) to provide five (5) year on-call
survey and mapping services for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with
the City Clerk);
2. Enter into PSAs with Atlas Technical Consultants, LLC (Atlas), Earth Systems, Geocon
West, Inc. (Geocon), Ninyo and Moore, and Verdantas, Inc. (Verdantas) to provide five-
year on-call geotechnical engineering and materials sampling/testing services for FYs
2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City Clerk);
3. Enter into PSAs with ERSC, GHD, Inc. (GHD), Interwest Consulting Group (Interwest),
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn), NV5, Psomas, Rick Engineering, TKE,
Westland, and Wood Rogers, Inc. (Wood Rogers) to provide five (5) year on-call civil
engineering services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City Clerk);
4. Enter into PSAs with Fehr and Peers, GHD, HR Green Pacific, Inc. (HR-Green), Kimley-
Horn, Rick Engineering, and STC Traffic, Inc. (STC Traffic) to provide five (5) year on-call
traffic engineering and transportation planning services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30
(file with the City Clerk);
5. Enter into PSAs with Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC (Accenture),
ERSC, LAE Associates Inc. (LAE Associates), Onward Engineering (Onward), Psomas,
and Z&K Consultants to provide five (5) year on-call construction management and
inspection services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City Clerk);
Page 108
Page 2
2
9
5
5
6. Enter into PSAs with ERSC, HR Green, MNS Engineers Inc. (MNS Engineers), Rick
Engineering and Transtech Engineers, Inc. (Transtech) to provide five (5) year on-call
development plan check services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City
Clerk);
7. Enter into PSAs with Gillis and Panichapan Architects, Inc. (Gillis and Panichapan), GO
Architects, Inc. (GO Architects), IDS Group Inc. (IDS Group), PBK Architects, Inc. (PBK
Architects), RDC-S111, Inc. (RDC-S111), Robert Borders and Associates (Robert
Borders), and SVA Architects, Inc. (SVA Architects) to provide five (5) year on-call
architectural engineering services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City
Clerk);
8. Enter into PSAs with Kimley-Horn, NUVIS, NV5, and RDC-S111 to provide five (5) year
on-call landscape architecture services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City
Clerk); and
9. Enter into PSAs with Epic Land Solutions and Interwest to provide five (5) year on-call
right of way support services for FYs 2025/26 through 2029/30 (file with the City Clerk).
BACKGROUND:
The Engineering Services Department current annual on-call support services contracts expired
as of June 30, 2025. Based on the projected workload, a new solicitation for on-call consulting
services was assembled and distributed to vendors. Staff is recommending a five (5) year contract
with a possible two one (1) year extensions under this agreement.
Engineering staff provided a detailed Scope of Services to the Procurement Division for the
purposes of establishing a qualified vendor list for a five (5) year on-call contract for various
disciplines on an as-needed basis for various capital improvement and development projects
within the City. A formal Request for Statement of Qualifications (RSOQ) #24/25-501 was posted
and advertised in the City’s electronic bidding system.
ANALYSIS:
In total, eighty (80) proposal responses were received with vendors having the option of
submitting on multiple disciplines within the same proposal response. An evaluation committee
was formed, and the proposal responses were evaluated and rated in accordance with the criteria
specified in the RSOQ.
The highest-ranking firms for each discipline are listed below. The vendors for each discipline
were the highest rated among the proposals and staff has determined that they are able to meet
the needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, scope, and fee schedule. The
number of firms for each discipline varies based on the workload needs for each discipline and
the scoring cutoffs for the evaluation.
Survey and Mapping Services
ERSC
Fuscoe Engineering
GIS Surveyors
NV5
Rick Engineering
Towill
Page 109
Page 3
2
9
5
5
Westland
Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Sampling/Testing Services
Atlas
Earth Systems
Geocon
Ninyo and Moore
Verdantas
Civil Engineering Services
ERSC
GHD
Interwest
Kimley-Horn
NV5
Psomas
Rick Engineering
TKE
Westland
Wood Rogers
Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Services
Fehr and Peers
GHD
HR-Green
Kimley-Horn
Rick Engineering
STC Traffic
Construction Management and Inspection Services
Accenture
ERSC
LAE Associates
Onward
Psomas
Z&K Consultants
Development Plan Check Services
ERSC
HR Green
MNS Engineers
Rick Engineering
Transtech
Architectural Engineering Services
Gillis and Panichapan
GO Architects
IDS Group
PBK Architects
Page 110
Page 4
2
9
5
5
RDC-S111
Robert Borders
SVA Architects
Landscape Architecture Services
Kimley-Horn
NUVIS
NV5
RDC-S111
Right of Way Support Services
Epic Land Solutions
Interwest
As these consultant firms have other clients and may not be available from time to time, having
multiple firms under contract allows the City flexibility in awarding services. Individual capital
improvement projects requiring these services will be awarded based on technical proposals
submitted for a specific task order request and upon consultant availability.
Staff has finalized proposed PSAs with these vendors and recommends awards for these thirty-
eight (38) vendors at this time. The PSAs are held on file with the City Clerk’s office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The selected consultants provided a rate sheet with hourly rates for each position they may use
under the contract. Staff have reviewed the rated sheets provided and found them to be
reasonable. The rate sheets are included in the PSAs. The rates are valid for the five-year term
of the agreement. Commencing May 15th of 2026, and each May 15th thereafter, the Consultant
must notify the City in writing to request an increase in the annual rates for the contract. The
increase in rates will be reviewed and negotiated by City staff, and if approved, take effect on July
1st of that year. Any rate adjustment will require prior approval by City Council if they exceed the
percentage increase in the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics’
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (“CPI”) for
the twelve-month period ending immediately prior to April 30th. However, the rates will not increase
by more than five percent (5%) for any given year without City Council approval even if the CPI
increase exceeds that amount.
Services for all contracts will be paid based on a fixed fee proposal for each project with a cost
breakdown for each task requested. Since each individual project requirement is different and
cost will vary depending on the work required, a proposal will be requested from the consulting
firm along with an estimated cost. At that time, a requisition will be processed for the services
using the account numbers for the individual projects. The total annual cost for services for each
discipline for the five (5) year on-call period will not exceed the budgeted amount as listed below.
Any increases to the below amounts will be authorized by the City Council.
Survey and Mapping: $200,000 per year
Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Sampling/Testing: $200,000 per year
Civil Engineering: $1,000,000 per year
Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning: $500,000 per year
Construction Management and Inspection: $500,000 per year
Development Plan Check: $200,000 per year
Page 111
Page 5
2
9
5
5
Architectural Engineering: $200,000 per year
Landscape Architecture: $200,000 per year
Right of Way Support: $200,000 per year
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Engaging with multiple qualified professional service vendors allows the City to intentionally
embrace and anticipate our future by establishing the ability to utilize on-call capacity to achieve
the community’s vision.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 112
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City of
Ontario for a Pavement Resurfacing of the Southern Half of the Vineyard
Avenue and 8th Street Intersection as Part of the Fiscal Year 2025/26
Major Arterial Paving Program. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Ontario for pavement resurfacing of the
southern half of the Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street intersection as part of the Fiscal Year (FY)
2025/26 Major Arterial Paving Program (Project); and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
BACKGROUND:
In July 2024, the City of Ontario Engineering Department and the Engineering Services
Department agreed to partner on a number of upcoming pavement resurfacing projects over the
next few years. The benefits of partnering are to receive more favorable construction bid prices
due to the larger quantities of work, reduce staff time involved in managing construction, and limit
impacts on residents due to construction. Projects selected border both cities and were aligned
in terms of paving priorities based on the conditions of the roadway and available budgets.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga’s approved budget for the FY 2025/26 Major Arterial Paving
Program includes; Vineyard Avenue/Carnelian Street from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard
and the Cucamonga Creek Channel Crossing to the northern half of the 8th Street intersection,
and Highland Avenue from Sapphire Street to Carnelian Street and Beryl Street to Archibald
Avenue. The City of Ontario requested to include the southern half of the Vineyard Avenue and
8th Street intersection, which is within their City limits, as part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s
Project. A vicinity map illustrating the overall project limits and the Ontario portion of the work is
included as Attachment 1.
The scope of work to be performed consists of weed killing, routing and crack sealing, cold milling,
asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, grinding and patching heavily alligatored pavement, adjusting
existing manholes and valves to new grade, restriping and installing pavement markings,
Page 113
Page 2
2
9
9
1
upgrading ramps to meet current ADA standards and installation of new thermoplastic striping.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has reviewed the existing pavement condition index (PCI) values in the City’s Pavement
Management System and noted that Vineyard Avenue from the Cucamonga Creek Channel
Crossing to the 8th Street intersection has a PCI of 34. PCI is a numerical index between 0 (poor)
to 100 (good) which is used to indicate the general condition of a pavement. A PCI of 34 indicates
that the pavement is in need of rehabilitation. Staff will utilize one of the City’s On-Call
Geotechnical Engineering Consultants to evaluate the pavement condition and make a
recommendation on the most appropriate pavement rehabilitation technique.
Staff has developed a preliminary engineering estimate for the Project, which Ontario staff have
reviewed and agree with, that is included in the agreement. The preliminary engineering estimate
included in the agreement is for reference purposes only, the costs to be reimbursed will be based
on the actual construction costs for the bids received on the Project. Per the agreement, the City
of Rancho Cucamonga will pay for the construction cost up front and the City of Ontario will
reimburse the City for one hundred percent (100%) of the actual construction costs plus survey
costs that occur within the City of Ontario portion of the Project, plus an additional ten percent
(10%) for design, construction administration and inspection fees. The reimbursement will be
completed within sixty (60) days following the date of final acceptance of the Project.
The City of Ontario agrees with the terms of the agreement and will be taking the contract to the
City of Ontario City Council for approval on September 2, 2025. A copy of the Reimbursement
Agreement is included as Attachment 2.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 “Existing
Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Anticipated construction costs for the Ontario portion of the work that will be reimbursed are
estimated to be as follows:
Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract with Contingency $155,680
Engineering and Project Management Costs (10%)$15,570
Design Survey Cost $5,240
Total Estimated Cost $176,490
There is no fiscal impact at this time. Once the design and bidding for the Project is complete,
City Staff will prepare a staff report for Council consideration to award the construction contract.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Reimbursement Agreement
Page 114
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2023-14
"FISCAL YEAR 25/26 MAJOR ARTERIAL PAVING PROGRAM”
Vineyard Avenue/Carnelian Street from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard & the
Cucamonga Creek Channel Crossing to 8th Street & Highland Avenue from Sapphire Street to
Carnelian Street & Beryl Street to Archibald Avenue
NOT TO SCALE
6
0
5
4
Project Site
Project Site
Ontario’s Portion
Ontario Portion
Page 115
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 of 1
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
CITY OF ONTARIO
FOR
PAVEMENT RESURFACING OF VINEYARD AVENUE FROM THE SOUTH
HALF OF THE EIGHTH STREET INTERSECTION
This Reimbursement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “AGREEMENT”) is made and
entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to
as “RANCHO CUCAMONGA”), and the City of Ontario, a California municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as “ONTARIO”). RANCHO CUCAMONGA and
ONTARIO may be referred to individually as a “PARTY” and collectively as “PARTIES”
in this AGREEMENT.
WITNESSETH
A. WHEREAS, the RANCHO CUCAMONGA Capital Improvement Program
(“CIP”) includes the provision of certain public improvements and the construction of
street resurfacing improvements on Vineyard Avenue at the Eighth Street intersection
(“PROJECT”); and
B. WHEREAS, the PROJECT includes the design, project management, street
preparation, street asphalt resurfacing, all striping replacement, concrete improvements,
traffic signal improvements, traffic control, and construction inspection; and
C. WHEREAS, the PROJECT begins at the border of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA and ONTARIO, and is mutually beneficial to both cities; and
D. WHEREAS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA and ONTARIO agree that
RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall serve as Lead Agency on the PROJECT for the design
and construction phases of the PROJECT; and
E. WHEREAS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, as the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency for the PROJECT, has determined that the PROJECT
is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines; and
Page 116
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 1
F. WHEREAS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA and ONTARIO mutually agree
that ONTARIO shall reimburse RANCHO CUCAMONGA for One Hundred Percent
(100%) of the PROJECT’S actual construction costs and survey costs that occur within the
City of ONTARIO (“ONTARIO’S COSTS”), plus Ten Percent (10%) for design,
construction administration, and inspection (“ENGINEERING & PROJECT
MANAGEMENT COSTS”) associated with the PROJECT.
NOW, THEREFORE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA and ONTARIO mutually agree
to the following:
SECTION I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AGREES:
1. That only eligible PROJECT expenses, as set forth in Attachment “A” to this
AGREEMENT, will be reimbursed by ONTARIO. RANCHO CUCAMONGA
agrees that it will only request reimbursement from ONTARIO for eligible
PROJECT expenses as defined in Attachment “A.”
2. To maintain and make available to ONTARIO, copies of all
consultant/contractor invoices, source documents, books and records; and
expenses as set forth in Attachment “A” and in connection with the PARTIES’
performance under this AGREEMENT for a minimum of three (3) years from
the date of the Final Acceptance by RANCHO CUCAMONGA or until audit
retention is achieved, whichever is later.
3. To fully cooperate with ONTARIO to allow for the preparation of a PROJECT
audit if requested by ONTARIO in writing within three (3) years from date of
the Final Acceptance by RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The audit is intended to
verify that all funds expended for costs on the PROJECT were used in
conformance with this AGREEMENT.
4. To render services for design, project management and construction
management utilizing RANCHO CUCAMONGA staff which may be
supplemented by consultants that are specifically tasked for completing the
PROJECT.
5. To make a CEQA Determination on the PROJECT and file the necessary
environmental documents with the County Clerk and Office of Planning and
Research, if necessary, and to complete all required public notifications and
hearings. Under CEQA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA is the Lead Agency for the
PROJECT.
6. To prepare plans, specifications and estimates for the PROJECT under the
direction of a registered Professional Engineer licensed in the applicable
professional field in the State of California, which shall be subject to review and
Page 117
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 3 of 1
approval by ONTARIO with respect to the portions of the PROJECT located within
ONTARIO.
7. To contract for the construction and installation of the PROJECT at RANCHO
CUCAMONGA’s cost and expense, but subject to ONTARIO’S reimbursement,
as set forth in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT.
8. To complete the PROJECT in a timely manner in accordance with the plans and
specifications approved by ONTARIO.
SECTION II
ONTARIO AGREES:
1. To reimburse RANCHO CUCAMONGA for One Hundred Percent (100%) of
ONTARIO’S COSTS that are incurred by RANCHO CUCAMONGA for the
PROJECT, plus Ten Percent (10%) for the ENGINEERING & PROJECT
MANAGEMENT COSTS.
2. To reimburse RANCHO CUCAMONGA for its share of costs no later than sixty
(60) days following the date of final acceptance of the PROJECT by RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
3. To designate a Project Manager to represent ONTARIO through whom all
communications shall be channeled.
4. That its Project Manager will distribute submittals, schedules, and other
correspondence to applicable ONTARIO departments for review and comment.
ONTARIO shall transmit review comments within ten (10) working days after
the submittal is received. If no comments are received within such time,
ONTARIO will be considered to have no objection to the approval of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
5. In the event ONTARIO elects to perform a PROJECT audit, ONTARIO may
rely on any prior audit of RANCHO CUCAMONGA relating to the PROJECT
performed pursuant to the provisions of State and Federal laws.
SECTION III
THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. To abide by all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations
pertaining to the PROJECT, including policies in the applicable program in the
applicable General Plan, as amended, as of the date of the last signature on this
AGREEMENT.
2. ONTARIO’s financial responsibility for the PROJECT (ONTARIO’S COSTS
and ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS) shall not exceed
Page 118
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 4 of 1
One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated costs set forth in Attachment “A,” plus Ten
Percent (10%) for the ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS.
According to current cost estimates, the reimbursement is estimated to be One Hundred
Seventy-Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Three Dollars and Sixty Cents ($176,483.60)
as demonstrated in Attachment “A”; however the actual costs of the items listed in
Attachment “A,” and ONTARIO’s share of those costs, upon completion of the project
may be different. The final costs for all eligible PROJECT expenses set forth in
Attachment “A” shall be used to set the final amount of reimbursement. In the event
ONTARIO’S COSTS and/or ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS
exceed the amounts identified in Attachment “A,” RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall inform
ONTARIO in writing of the excess costs, accompanied by supporting evidence, and
thereafter the PARTIES shall work together in an attempt to agree upon an amendment to
the amounts identified in Attachment “A.” In no event, however, will ONTARIO be
responsible for COSTS and/or ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS
in excess of One Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Three Dollars and
Sixty Cents ($176,483.60) absent a written amendment approved by both PARTIES.
3. This AGREEMENT can be amended only when agreed upon in writing by both
PARTIES.
4. RANCHO CUCAMONGA will use its own funds to design and construct the
PROJECT with the understanding that ONTARIO will reimburse RANCHO
CUCAMONGA for ONTARIO’s share of eligible PROJECT expenditures at a
later date in accordance with this AGREEMENT.
5. Eligible PROJECT reimbursements shall include only those costs incurred by
RANCHO CUCAMONGA for PROJECT activities that are described in this
Attachment “A” of this AGREEMENT and shall not include escalation or
interest.
6. RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
ONTARIO, its officers and employees, from and against any and all actions,
claims, injuries, damages, liabilities, demands, losses, judgments, penalties,
expenses and costs including attorney’s fees for staff attorneys and outside
counsel (collectively “Liabilities”) arising out of or in any way connected with
anything done or omitted to be done by RANCHO CUCAMONGA, its officers,
employees, agents, contractors, consultants, subcontractors and sub consultants
of any level, in connection with the PROJECT or under or in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to RANCHO CUCAMONGA
under this AGREEMENT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA’s obligations under this
Article apply to ONTARIO’s “passive” and “active” negligence, but do not
apply to ONTARIO’s “sole negligence” or “willful misconduct” within the
meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.
Page 119
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 5 of 1
7. ONTARIO shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, its officers and employees, from and against any and all
actions, claims, injuries, damages, liabilities, demands, losses, judgments,
penalties, expenses and costs including attorney’s fees for staff attorneys and
outside counsel (collectively “Liabilities”) arising out of or in any way
connected with anything done or omitted to be done by ONTARIO, its officers,
employees, agents, contractors, consultants, subcontractors and subconsultants
of any level, in connection with the PROJECT or under or in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to ONTARIO under this
AGREEMENT. ONTARIO’s obligations under this Article apply to RANCHO
CUCAMONGA’s “passive” and “active” negligence, but do not apply to
RANCHO CUCAMONGA’s “sole negligence” or “willful misconduct” within
the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.
8. RANCHO CUCAMONGA is an authorized self-insured public entity for
purposes of Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability and
Workers’ Compensation and warrants that through its programs of self-
insurance, it has adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities
arising out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this
AGREEMENT.
9. ONTARIO is an authorized self-insured public entity for purposes of
Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers’
Compensation and warrants that through its program of self-insurance, it has
adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising out of the
performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this AGREEMENT.
10. This AGREEMENT shall be considered terminated upon reimbursement of all
eligible costs by PROJECT expenses as defined herein, with the exception of
paragraphs 6 and 7 above, which shall survive termination of this
AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, to the extent
consistent with the terms and obligations hereof, any PARTY may terminate
this AGREEMENT at any time, with or without cause, by giving thirty (30)
calendar days written notice to the other PARTY. In the event of termination,
the PARTY terminating the AGREEMENT shall be liable for any costs or other
obligations it may have incurred under the terms of the AGREEMENT prior to
termination and the terminating PARTY shall reimburse the non-terminating
PARTY for any payments or reimbursements paid to the terminating party
pursuant to this AGREEMENT.
11. Notice given under or regarding this AGREEMENT shall be deemed given (a)
upon actual delivery, if delivery is personally made; or (b) upon delivery into
the United States Mail if delivery is by postage paid certified mail (return
receipt requested), fax or private courier including overnight delivery services.
Notice shall be sent to the respective PARTY at the address indicated below or
to any other address as a PARTY may designate from time to time by a notice
given in accordance with this paragraph.
Page 120
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 6 of 1
If to RANCHO
CUCAMONGA: John R. Gillison, City Manager
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
(909) 477-2700
If to ONTARIO: Scott Ochoa, City Manager
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
(909) 395-2010
12. The Recitals stated above are true and correct and are incorporated by this
reference into the AGREEMENT.
13. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of California. Any action brought by any PARTY hereto shall
be brought within the State of California, County of San Bernardino and both
PARTIES waive any right to change venue, including under Code of Civil
Procedure Section 394.
14. This AGREEMENT may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original. This AGREEMENT shall be dated on the date executed
by RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
15. There are no third party beneficiaries, and this AGREEMENT is not intended,
and shall not be construed to be for the benefit of, or be enforceable by, any
other person or entity whatsoever.
16. Attachment “A” is hereby incorporated into this AGREEMENT and includes:
1. Pavement Rehabilitation of Vineyard Avenue at the Eighth Street
intersection.
2. Project Scope
3. Projected Cost and Schedule
Page 121
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 7 of 1
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ONTARIO
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR
PAVEMENT RESURFACING OF VINEYARD AVENUE AT THE EIGHTH
STREET INTERSECTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this AGREEMENT below.
CITY OF ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By: ___________________________
Scott Ochoa
City Manager
By: ___________________________
John R. Gillison
City Manager
Dated: ___________________________Dated: ___________________________
Attest: ___________________________
Sheila Mautz, City Clerk
Attest: __________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Nick Ghirelli
City Attorney
Page 122
Attachment A
Page 1 of 1
Pavement Rehabilitation of Vineyard Avenue at the Eighth Street Intersection
Project Scope, Projected Cost, and Schedule
Proposed Project Work
Vineyard Avenue at the Eighth Street intersection is to be resurfaced as part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
2026 Spring Pavement Rehabilitation Project. This project includes grinding removal of old failing asphalt and
placement of rubberized asphalt pavement, upgrading curb ramps, sidewalk repairs, and new striping. The Ontario
portion of costs are described below.
Summary of Project Costs (Estimate)
Proposed Project Schedule (milestone delivery dates)
Estimated construction start date: March 2026
Estimated completion date: June 2026
Page 123
3
0
0
5
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager
Zack Neighbors, Building and Safety Director
Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer,
Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal
Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer,
Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP for legal services related to enforcement of the Municipal Code,
including nuisance abatement, criminal prosecution receivership action, and other civil
matters.
BACKGROUND:
Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP (“DRL”) has over 40 years of experience representing
municipalities in criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings to enforce state and local laws.
DRL’s specialized expertise has enabled California municipalities to efficiently address code
violations, protect public health and safety, and preserve the community’s quality of life.
ANALYSIS:
Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP ("DRL") began representing municipalities in 1979 and has
dedicated itself to assisting local communities in their efforts to provide quality of life to their
residents and protect against conditions and activities that impact the public health, safety,
and welfare from nuisance conditions and unlawful activities.
Over the course of the past 40 years, DRL has worked to reduce blight, increase public safety,
and combat all types of nuisances that, as per the "broken window" theory, undermine the
social and economic backbones of communities. DRL has accomplished these tasks by
helping cities establish “Code Enforcement” policies and procedures, modifying and/or
adopting necessary code provisions to achieve community goals, and commencing
appropriate legal enforcement procedures in the administrative, civil, and criminal arenas.
DRL is one of the most established and experienced law firms in California, providing
necessary legal services for the City. All attorneys are licensed to practice law throughout
California and their dedicated support staff include paralegals, clerks, and administrative
support staff, all delivering exceptional legal services.
The proposed agreement with DRL is for a term of five (5) years, with two (2) optional one-
year extensions, for a total possible term of seven (7) years. The total compensation under
the agreement is to not exceed $840,000, which covers the full initial five-year term and
Page 124
3
0
0
5
potential extensions. The term of this contract ensures continuity of service and a long-term
legal support without requiring annual contract renegotiation.
Approval of this agreement will allow the City to continue receiving elite legal services and
ensure the City has conflict-free legal representation when necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There should not be any fiscal impact, as the cost of services has already been budgeted for
the Fiscal Year 2025/26 in various accounts for civil litigation and criminal prosecution.
Additionally, as authorized by the California Government Code and the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP strongly pursues cost recovery for services
required to bring a property into compliance.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Councils Core Values of promoting and enhancing a safe and
healthy community for all while providing the city with legal services to combat blight in our
neighborhoods.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Professional Service Agreement and Scope of Services
Page 125
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 16th day of
September, 2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal
corporation (“City”) and Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, a California Limited Liability
Partnership (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. City seeks to engage Consultant to provide the following professional
services: all advice, legal representation, prosecutions and assistance, as assigned to
Consultant, concerning code enforcement, nuisance abatement, receiverships, criminal
and civil code enforcement, and related services (“the Project”).
B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services
described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner
set forth and more fully described herein.
D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws
of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a
good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the
mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Consultant’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and
professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” and “C” above, as more fully set
forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated August 15, 2025 and entitled “Scope of Work”,
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope,
and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope
of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies
between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the
Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-111
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 126
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 2
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a
revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to
this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten
percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in
writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under
this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for
professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth
in the Scope of Work.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into
this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to
undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant
hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing
the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement,
Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant
(a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has
carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the
facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard
of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably
acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or
unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant
shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s
risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years
and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties
signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not
be provided until this Agreement has been executed and above requirements have been
fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a
total of seven (7) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein.
Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing
review, and in accordance with all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise
provided in writing by the City.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant
shall not exceed eight hundred forty thousand dollars ($840,000), including all out of
Page 127
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 3
pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City
shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City
shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of
any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be
entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance
with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall
compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the
Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra
services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate
documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in
Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other
records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for
review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Community Improvement
Supervisor Lori Price, or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City
Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City
Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and
Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative.
Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean
the approval of the City Representative.
5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement,
William Litvak and James Eckart are hereby designated as the principal and
representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services
specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability
and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City
to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be
Page 128
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 4
responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant
and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant
may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Consultant’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under
Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including,
without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with
the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social
Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to
be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents
serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, from any and all
liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from
Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California
Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to
Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification
arising under this Section 6.
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files,
drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared,
created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any
and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same
(collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the
benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach
of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without
restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes,
sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under
this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Page 129
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 5
Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its
representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no
circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings,
reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery,
notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment,
performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of
this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project,
shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of
this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above,
the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its
subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory
copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to
the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights
whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.
City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but
not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding
and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents
that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any
instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists,
including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of
the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full
legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the
role of city officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a
claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual
provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.
Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret
or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or
incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event
City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use
thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to
continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a
license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non-
infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times
remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to
incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of
City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
Page 130
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 6
not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or
employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes
on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold
City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against
City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant
and Consultant’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting,
statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants
that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not
be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant
such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to
City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this section
shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to
information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the
Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide
information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably
necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.
10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained
any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant,
to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person
or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee,
commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of
this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right,
at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or
to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any
such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise,
Page 131
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 7
in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to
the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if
such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable
laws as described in subsection 10.1.
11. Indemnification.
11.1 Professional Services. In connection with its professional services,
the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of city or agency officials, (collectively, “Indemnitees”), with respect to any
and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively,
“Claims”), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and
injury to any property, to the extent the same out of, pertain to, or relate to the
negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers,
employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall reimburse all reasonable defense costs
and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection
with such defense.
11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by
Section 11.1, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees
with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or
injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to
the non-professional acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its
officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of this
Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in
connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs
and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection
with such defense.
11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any
rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the
deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this
Agreement.
11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under
or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the
termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which
Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to
an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment
Page 132
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 8
against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under
this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives,
employees and subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State
of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the
City, having an extended reporting period of not less than
three (3) years; or Professional Liability insurance shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion
of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year
period, provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the
Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 13. Either policy shall be
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent
insurable.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no
less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or
the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence
limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
Page 133
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 9
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the
aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City,
its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city
or agency officials, are to be covered as additional insureds
as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by
or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed
operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or
used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased,
hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of City or agency officials which are not also
limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of city or agency officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, their officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall
not contribute with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except
after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has
been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for
Page 134
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 10
non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty
(30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of
a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall
expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against
City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials.
(6) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by
City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the
State of California and which is rated A:VII or better
according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating
Guide.
(7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other
provisions of the required policy, including breaches of
warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be
provided.
(8) Specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending
any claim against any insured, including court costs and
attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not
deplete any policy limits.
(9) Other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as
required by the City in any request for proposals applicable
to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance
coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person
authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies
shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance.
If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide
City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required
policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City
relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an
amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
Page 135
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 11
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to
Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall
pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the
termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant
shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim
for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured
more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the
City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment
Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for
any Additional Services required because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of
delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s
regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this section, or to such other
addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the
provisions of this section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Tel: (909) 774-2712, Ext. 4259
E-Mail: Lori.Price@CityofRC.us
If to Consultant: William Litvak, Managing Partner
Dapeer, Rosenblit, Litvak, LLP
11500 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 550
Los Angeles, California 90064
Tel: (310) 477-5575
E-Mail: WLitvak@drllaw.com
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the
performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee,
subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
Page 136
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 12
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer
any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s
obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein,
any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time
Consultant performs the Services.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of
any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a
waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the
making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by
City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of
Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or
prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover
its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material
discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any
document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San
Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement
shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the
party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement
or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each
of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and
integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior
Page 137
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 13
oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be
amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the
parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Consultant Name: Dapeer, Rosenblit, Litvak, LLP
By: 8/18/2025
William Litvak Date
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Name Date
Managing Partner
Title Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By: 8/18/2025
Name Date
By:
Name Date
Senior Partner
Title Title
Approval Buyer II, Purchasing
Alternate, Risk Management Coordinator
Page 138
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design)
Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Page 14
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Scope of Services to be provided to the City by Consultant are as follows:
a) Review existing City codes, regulations, rules, resolutions, policies, and practices,
and provide recommendations and/or draft amendments, modifications, and/or
updates to said codes, regulations, rules, resolutions, policies, and practices.
b) Conduct meetings with City Staff to discuss pending investigations or other
matters, and to provide guidance and recommendations for enforcement actions.
c) When appropriate, draft correspondence to and conduct meetings with violators in
an effort to obtain voluntary compliance without the need for formal legal
enforcement proceedings.
d) Assist City Staff with the preparation and acquisition of warrants to inspect and/or
abate real properties within the City.
e) Initiate and prosecute criminal and civil enforcement actions, including Health and
Safety Receiverships.
f) Appear at any proceeding, court, agency, administrative body related to any action
in which Consultant is representing the City or any affiliated or associated person
or entity.
g) Assist staff in initiating administrative remedies, including administrative nuisance
abatement, license revocation, CUP and special use permit revocations; Prepare
City Staff for administrative hearings and, when appropriate, represent City Staff
before a hearing officer or other appellate or reviewing authority (including the
Permits and Licenses Committee and Administrative Hearing Officer – or any other
appropriate committee, commission, and/or the City Council).
h) Provide educational trainings to City Staff, as needed and as requested by the City.
i) Represent the City at the City’s request in any action brought against the City.
j) Perform any other services, duties or functions as requested and/or approved by
the City Manager, City Attorney, and/or City Council.
k) Any ancillary related or other service required to properly complete the foregoing
services.
Page 139
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
Michelle Cowles, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration of the Purchase of Bendix King Radios and Miscellaneous
Related Equipment, in the Amount of $113,100, from 49er
Communications, in Accordance with the NASPO Cooperative
Purchasing Master Agreement No. 00318, CA Addenda 7-22-70-49-18.
(FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Fire Board authorize the purchase of 42 Bendix King Radios and
miscellaneous related equipment, in the amount of $113,100 from authorized distributor, 49er
Communications, Inc., of Nevada City, California. This purchase will be made utilizing the NASPO
Cooperative Purchasing Master Agreement No. 00318, for Public Safety Communications
Products, Services & Solutions, established by the State of Washington as the lead state for
California, Participation Addendum 7-22-70-49-18.
BACKGROUND:
Very high frequency (VHF) handheld and mobile radios are essential for interoperability with Cal
Fire, the US Forest Service, and surrounding fire agencies during wildland fires, natural disasters,
and other large-scale incidents. VHF frequencies are better suited for outdoor environments and
provide long distance communications in rugged and mountainous terrain, which is crucial for
large-scale incidents. These radios also serve as a critical backup to the Fire District’s 800 MHz
radio system.
The Fire District’s current BK KNG Command VHF portable radios were first purchased in
FY15/16, the second portion was funded in FY16/17, and the final phase of the District-wide
replacement was completed in FY17/18. Over time, these radios have reached the end of their
production life, with parts becoming harder to source and repair needs increasing, especially
during peak fire seasons.
ANALYSIS:
Due to the age of the Fire District’s current BK KNG Command VHF portable radios, staff has
determined to need to begin a phased replacement of all VHF radios. The new model BK KNG
Series, BKR5000 Command (CMD), complies with Project 25 (P25) digital Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) mandates and is built with the future in mind. P25 is a suite
of standards for digital radio communications for use by federal, state, and local public safety
organizations in North America to enable them to communicate with other agencies and mutual
Page 140
Page 2
2
8
5
0
aid response teams in emergencies. The CMD assures uninterrupted interoperability across
frequencies, different groups of responders, and variations in terrain.
Phase 1 will replace all overhead and strike team/wildland units with the new model of the CMD
Series handled radios. This phase will also rebuild the Fire District’s VHF cache of spare radios
that has been reduced over time due to the addition of the 2nd Battalion, Medic Squad 178 and
Medic Engine 178. Future Phase 2 is anticipated to replace approximately 42 VHF portable radios
to complete the transition to the new model.
The Fire District identified a purchasing opportunity through a cooperative contract from NASPO
awarded to 49er Communications. The Fire District provided the NASPO contract to the City’s
Procurement Division. Procurement reviewed the bid documents and contract and is satisfied that
the solicitation process and terms meet the Fire District and City's requirements. It has been
determined that utilizing the contract is the most advantageous, ensuring competitive pricing and
compliance with public purchasing requirements.
Staff recommends that the City Council / Fire Board approve the purchase of 42 Bendix King
BKR5000 CMD radios and miscellaneous related equipment utilizing the NASPO Cooperative
Contract 00318, CA Addenda 7-22-70-49-18, awarded to 49er Communications, in the amount of
$113,100, valid from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2026. The new radios include a
two-year warranty, reducing repair costs during that period, with further savings expected in
subsequent years due to newer equipment reliability. A Participating Agreement is required and
will need to be completed by the Fire District.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The purchase of replacement handheld radios was approved in the FY 2025-26 budget. A total
of $340,000 was allocated in the Fire Protection Capital Fund under account F288 CC501
SC7002 P0089 (Capital Outlay – Equipment and Furnishings) for replacement of both 800 MHz
radios and VHF radios. The total purchase price for the Bendix King CMD VHF radios will be
$113,100.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This purchase supports the Council’s strategic goals of maintaining operational readiness,
enhancing firefighter safety, and ensuring effective emergency response. Upgrading to modern,
interoperable communications equipment, supports the Council’s vision and core values by
providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is
accomplished by strengthening the Fire District’s ability to respond to incidents, collaborate with
regional partners, and protect the community during emergencies.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 141
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Rick Snawder, Deputy Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 004 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services
for the Fire Station 178 Project. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Fire Board approve amendment No. 004 to the Professional Services
Agreement, FD 19-021, with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire
Station 178 Project.
BACKGROUND:
On February 17, 2016, at the direction of the Fire Board, the District purchased 3.8 acres of
property located on the south side of Town Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue for a public use,
namely for fire safety and protection services for building a future Fire Station 178. Much strategic
analysis went into the selection of this land as the most viable location for the future fire station.
The location will help maximize existing resources to better serve the central community. This
new station will be based on modern construction standards and is intended to meet the District's
mission for at least 50 years.
On November 20, 2019, the Fire District and Mary McGrath Architects entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), CO# FD19-021, for consulting services that included Project Initiation
and Program Development. This initial phase identified goals and objectives, data collection, and
the scope and scale of the project with the Design Team.
On August 5, 2020, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 001 with Mary McGrath
Architects for $372,875 (including a 10% contingency) for Conceptual Design Build services of
the new Fire Station 178, in accordance with the price proposal submitted in RFP# 20/21¬001.
On July 7, 2021, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 002 for $44,540 for design of
a joint City/Fire records storage building and a solar/battery storage system for the fire station.
On October 20, 2021, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 003 for $33,640 for
design of the 9/11 Memorial at the Fire Station 178 site, as well as creation of the Basis of Design
documents and coordination with the Design-Build contractor’s team.
Page 142
Page 2
3
0
0
8
ANALYSIS:
Staff has determined the need to amend contract CO# FD 19-021 with Mary McGrath Architects
in order to allow for completion and closeout of the 9/11 Memorial at Fire Station 178.
Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve Amendment No. 004 to CO# FD 19-021 with Mary
McGrath Architects to extend the Term of Agreement through November 30, 2025. All other
Terms and Conditions of the existing agreement will remain in full effect.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no proposed contract increase as part of Amendment No. 4 to CO# FD 19-021 with Mary
McGrath Architects.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The construction of the Fire Station 178 will promote a safe and healthy community for all by
enhancing the delivery of vital life safety services and ensuring efficient response times to
residents, visitors, and businesses. The inclusion of the 9/11 Memorial will continue to build and
preserve a family-oriented atmosphere by providing the community a space for reflection and
remembrance.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 143
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director
Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor
Brittany Gulley, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Managed Services Agreement (CO 2025-084) in the
Total Amount of $270,000 and a Software Maintenance and Support
Agreement (CO 2025-085) in the Total Amount of $411,000 from the
Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) with Advanced Utility Systems for the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Customer Information System
Infinity Billing Software and Online Payment Portal Platform. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the below from the Municipal Utility
Fund (Fund 705):
1. A five-year Managed Services Agreement (CO 2025-084) with Advanced Utility Systems for
annual managed services of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s (RCMU’s) Customer
Information System (CIS) Infinity billing software, in the total not-to-exceed amount of $270,000
($56,305 for Fiscal Year 2025/26).
2. A five-year Software Maintenance and Support Agreement (CO 2025-085) with Advanced
Utility Systems for the RCMU CIS Infinity billing and online payment portal software, in the total
not-to-exceed amount of $411,000 ($86,390 for Fiscal Year 2025/26).
BACKGROUND:
Advanced Utility Systems provides RCMU’s license for the CIS Infinity billing software which is
used to manage daily operations, billing, and cash processing for RCMU. The system provides
official record keeping of all customer electricity accounts including customer information, monthly
meter read files, customer transactions, collection notifications, and meter inventory. In 2019,
RCMU entered into a Software Maintenance and Support Agreement with Advanced Utility
Systems and the contract is expiring at the end of 2025.
Additionally, Advanced Utility Systems provides managed services which includes technical off-
site support for any issues that may come up including rate calculations, batch updating errors,
minor formula adjustments, and bill print updates. The service also provides regular reports on
system maintenance, quarterly review of upcoming build logs, implementing new enhancements,
and an annual Business Process Review. In 2018, RCMU entered into the Managed Services
Agreement for these services which is expiring in August 2025.
Page 144
Page 2
2
9
0
4
ANALYSIS:
Advanced Utility Systems has provided consistently satisfactory billing and support services for
RCMU customers. Additionally, RCMU staff has worked with Advanced Utility Systems staff on
multiple Business Process Reviews to continue to improve on the customer experience and keep
processes efficient.
The requested software maintenance agreement would provide RCMU staff continued technical
support of the billing and online payment portal software. In addition to technical support, the
maintenance agreement also provides software build updates that can include bug fixes, software
enhancements, and additional security layers to keep the software current and up to date.
Staff recommends the City continue utilizing Advanced Utility Systems services to keep the
RCMU CIS Infinity billing software and services current and secure. An annual cost escalator not
to exceed 5% or the local CPI percentage is included in the agreements and has been accounted
for in the total contract amounts. The annual escalator is used to manage the reliability of the
software, explore new initiatives and customer engagement, while also continuously improving to
meet cyber-security demands and technology advancements. The escalator over the last
agreement averaged 5%. Copies of the original contracts and previous amendments are on file
in the City Clerk Services Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
RCMU has budgeted first-year funding from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) in the Fiscal
Year 2025/26 Budget:
Agreement Contract No.Account No.Total
Managed Services CO 2025-084 F705CC304SC2106 $56,305
Software Maintenance and Support CO 2025-085 F705CC304SC2106 $86,390
Total $142,695
Costs for future years will be requested as part of the subsequent budget periods to fulfill the
remaining annual contract obligations.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the
future by providing a secure billing and online software platform for RCMU staff and customers
with planned annual process improvements to facilitate continued operational excellence.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Contract No. 2025-084
Attachment 2 – Contract No. 2025-085
Page 145
Advanced Managed Services
City of Rancho Cucamonga
June 09, 2025
2025-084
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 146
MANAGED SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS MANAGED SERVICES AGREEMENT made as of the 1st day of August, 2025 (the
“Effective Date”).
BETWEEN:
Advanced Utility Systems, a division of N. HARRIS COMPUTER
CORPORATION
(“Harris”)
- and -
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
(“Organization”)
WHEREAS:
(a) The Organization wishes to retain Harris to perform certain managed services as
set out herein in respect of certain Harris software licensed by Organization pursuant to a
Software License Agreement entered into between the parties on November 1, 2012; and
(b) Harris has agreed to provide such services on the terms and conditions set out in
this Agreement; and
(c) Organization has agreed to maintain an effective Support and Maintenance
Agreement during the Term of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set out in this Agreement and
for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged), the parties agree as follows:
1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a
period of five (5) years, ending on July 31, 2030 (the “Initial Term”). Upon expiration of the
Initial Term, this Agreement may be renewed for an additional term of two (2) years (the
“Renewal Term”), unless one party gives written notice to the other party not less than ninety
(90) days prior to the end of the then current term of its intention not to renew. The Initial Term
and the Renewal Terms shall collectively be referred to as the “Term”.
Page 147
2. Services.
(a) Harris’ Obligations. Harris shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide the
project management services set out in Schedule “A” (the “Services”) to Organization.
(b) Organization’s Obligations. To enable Harris to perform the Services, Organization
agrees to provide the following to Harris:
i. Information relative to Organization’s hardware and software on which the required
AMS programs must run or with which these programs must interact.
ii. Remote access to Organization’s system for the purposes of performing the Services;
iii. Access to and use of facilities, equipment, hardware and software for installation and use
solely by Harris of ongoing manual and automated processes related to and required by
Harris to perform the Services;
iv. Personnel and assistance as is reasonably required to enable Harris to perform the
Services;
v. Ongoing access to the system via an Internet connection acceptable to Harris.
vi. A representative with authority to approve the plans and deliverables described in
Schedule “A” if so required.
(c) Ownership. Organization agrees that Harris may install, access and run certain scripts
and other software tools on Organization’s hardware as required by Harris to perform the
Services (the “Harris Tools”). Organization acknowledges and agrees that Harris is and shall
remain the sole owner of all such Harris Tools, including all copyright, patents, trademarks, trade
secrets and other intellectual property rights therein, and Organization is granted no license to
access or use the Harris Tools. Organization may retain a paper and/or electronic copy of any
reports provided by Harris to Organization as part of the Services, however Harris is and shall
remain the owner of all copyright, patents, trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual
property rights in and to such reports.
3. Fees.
(a) Fees. In consideration of providing the Services, Organization agrees to pay the fees set
out in Schedule “B” (the “Fees”) to Harris. During the term of this Agreement, Harris shall,
from time to time, deliver invoices to Organization. Organization shall pay the then prevailing
Managed Service Fee in advance for each term of the Managed Service Agreement and where
the notice of non-renewal has not been provided in accordance with these terms, the
Organization is obliged to pay the Fee for the then applicable term. The termination of this
Managed Service Agreement by Organization shall not affect the License or the Software
License Agreement. Harris shall neither refund any Managed Service Fees nor any Billable Fees
if this Agreement is terminated. Each invoice delivered to Organization by Harris shall be due
and payable upon receipt thereof by Organization.
i. In consideration for the services specified in Schedule A, Organization shall pay the
“Managed Service Fee” as detailed in Schedule B below. The Year 1 Managed
Service Fee will be billed in advance beginning on the Effective Date. For each
additional year, Organization will be billed annually in advance. The Managed
Page 148
Services Fee is subject to five percent (5%) annual increase, or Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI—U), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
area, whichever is greater. The CPI-U used for adjustments shall be the CPI-U last
officially published at the time of invoicing prior to the last day of each applicable
year of the term (whether initial or any renewal period), as applicable, whether such
CPI-U has been published on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or other basis.
ii. Harris may change the Managed Service Fee from time to time in relation to each
renewal term but Organization shall only be billed once per year.
iii. In addition to the Managed Service Fee, Organization shall reimburse Harris for its
direct expenses in providing services (“Billable Fees”) pursuant to this Managed
Services Agreement which include as of the Start Date:
a. All direct travel expenses including, but not limited to hotel, airfare, car
rental, tolls, parking and airline and travel agent fees; each individual’s
travel time billing rate of $90.00/hour; a per diem rate of $70.00 for week
days and $125.00 for weekends and statutory holidays that includes all
meal, food and telecommunications expenses (no receipts will be
provided); and a mileage charge consistent with the Internal Revenue
Service recommended rate per mile,
b. Harris may update its reimbursement policies from time to time, in which
case such updated policies shall apply for purposes of this Managed
Services Agreement, provided that such updated reimbursement policies
must generally apply to all clients of Harris.
(b) Taxes. The Fees are exclusive of taxes. Organization agrees to pay all foreign, federal,
state, provincial, county or local income taxes, value added taxes, use, personal, property, sales
and any other taxes, tariff, duty or similar charges that may be levied by a taxing authority
(excluding taxes on Harris’s net income) (“Taxes”) unless it provides Harris with a tax
exemption certificate acceptable to the applicable taxing authorities. Harris will reimburse
Organization to the extent Taxes paid by Organization are recovered by Harris from the taxing or
governmental authority. To the extent that Taxes may only be refunded to Harris, Harris agrees
to cooperate reasonably with Organization’s obtaining a refund or reimbursement of the Taxes.
In the event that Organization is obliged by law to withhold any tax with respect to a payment to
Harris, Organization will (a) withhold the appropriate amount from the payment; (b) pay the
withheld amount to the applicable authority, as required by law, and (c) furnish to Harris
certified copies of tax receipts and any other documentation reasonably requested by Harris as
proof of Organization’s payment of the withholding tax.
(c) Late Payment. In the event Organization fails to pay all or any portion of an invoice on
or before ninety (90) days after the date it becomes due, in addition to all other remedies Harris
has under this Agreement or otherwise, Harris shall have the option to suspend or terminate all
Services under this Agreement. Suspension or termination of any such Services shall not relieve
the Organization of its obligation to pay its outstanding invoices, including any applicable late
charges.
Page 149
4. Warranty
(a) Warranty. Harris warrants that the Services will be performed in a professional and
diligent manner by personnel who are competent in performing their individual tasks.
(b) DISCLAIMER. TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EXCEPT
FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY PROVIDED IN SECTION 4(a), THE SERVICES
ARE PROVIDED TO THE ORGANIZATION “AS IS” AND THERE ARE NO
WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED, WRITTEN OR ORAL, ARISING BY STATUTE, OPERATION OF LAW,
COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE OF TRADE OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING THEM
OR ANY OTHER PRODUCT, SERVICE OR MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREUNDER
OR IN CONNECTION HEREWITH.
HARRIS, ITS LICENSORS AND SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS REGARDING THE SERVICES AND ANY
MATERIALS PROVIDED HEREUNDER OR IN CONNECTION HEREWITH,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABLE
QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY, DURABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE, TITLE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.
HARRIS DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES SHALL
MEET ANY OR ALL OF THE ORGANIZATION’S PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS.
NO AGREEMENTS VARYING OR EXTENDING ANY EXPRESS WARRANTIES
SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE BINDING ON EITHER PARTY
UNLESS IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED SIGNING OFFICER OF
HARRIS.
5. Termination
(a) Termination. This Agreement may be terminated as follows:
i. In addition to any other rights and remedies available to it, either party may
immediately terminate this Agreement in the event of material breach by the other
party of its obligations hereunder that is not cured within ninety (90) days of receipt
of written notice from the other party to that effect;
ii. If Organization has failed to pay the Fees or other amounts due then Harris shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement effective immediately upon written
notice to Organization that effect; and
iii. Either party may terminate this Agreement effective immediately upon written
notice to the other party if the other party: (i) becomes insolvent; (ii) becomes the
subject of any proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency or liquidation law,
whether domestic or foreign, and whether voluntary or involuntary, which is not
resolved favorably to the subject party within ninety (90) days of commencement
Page 150
thereof; or (iii) becomes subject to property seizure under court order, court
injunction or other court order which has a material adverse effect on its ability to
perform hereunder.
(b) Effects of Termination. In the event of termination of this Agreement:
i. Organization shall immediately pay all outstanding Fees and other amounts owing
to Harris under this Agreement; and
ii. Organization agrees that Harris shall have the right to access and delete all Harris
Tools installed on Organization’s equipment.
6. Limitation of Liability
TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AND EXCEPTS FOR
CLAIM ARISING FROM THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF
HARRIS, HARRIS, ITS AFFILIATES, AND EACH OF THEIR RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS,
OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ ENTIRE LIABILITY AND
ORGANIZATION’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICES AND
ANY OTHER PRODUCTS, MATERIALS OR SERVICES SUPPLIED BY HARRIS IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT FOR DAMAGES FOR ANY CAUSE AND
REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR IN TORT,
INCLUDING FUNDAMENTAL BREACH, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR
OTHERWISE, SHALL NOT EXCEED IN THE AGGREGATE ONE (1) MILLION
DOLLARS.
IN NO EVENT SHALL HARRIS, ITS AFFILIATES AND EACH OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND SHAREHOLDERS, BE LIABLE FOR ANY
CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, OR SPECIAL
DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FOR LOST REVENUE
OR LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF DATA, FAILURE TO REALIZE
EXPECTED SAVINGS, OR COST OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES ARISING
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF IT HAS BEEN
ADVISED OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE OCCURRENCE OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE
OR SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE IS FORSEEABLE AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY
FAILURE OF ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY LIMITED REMEDY.
7. Confidential Information
a) Definition. The parties acknowledge that it may receive Confidential Information from
the other party or otherwise in connection with this Agreement. “Confidential Information”
means all information or material that either party treats as confidential and any information
relating to third parties that a party has an obligation to treat as confidential, which is disclosed
by or obtained by a party in connection with this Agreement, whether such information is in oral,
Page 151
written, graphic or electronic form, which: is (A) marked "Confidential," "Restricted," or
"Proprietary Information" or other similar marking, (B) known by the parties to be considered
confidential or proprietary, or (C) which should be known or understood to be confidential or
proprietary by an individual exercising reasonable commercial judgment in the circumstances.
Confidential Information does not include information to the extent that such information: (i) is
or becomes generally known to the public by any means other than a breach of the obligations of
a receiving party hereunder; (ii) was previously known to the receiving party as evidenced by its
written records; (iii) is rightly received by the receiving party from a third party who is not under
an obligation of confidentiality; or (iv) is independently developed by the receiving party without
reference to or use of the other party's Confidential Information which such independent
development can be established by evidence that would be acceptable to a court of competent
jurisdiction.
b) Confidentiality Obligations. Each of the parties agree:
i. to maintain the Confidential Information of the other party in confidence and to
take all reasonable steps, which shall be no less than those steps it takes to protect
its own confidential and proprietary information, to protect the Confidential
Information of the other party from unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or
publication;
ii. not to use the Confidential Information of the other party other than in the course
of exercising its rights or performing its obligations under this Agreement;
iii. not to disclose or release such Confidential Information except to the extent
required by applicable law or during the course of or in connection with any
litigation, arbitration or other proceeding based upon or in connection with the
subject matter of this Agreement, provided that the receiving party shall first give
reasonable notice to the disclosing party prior to such disclosure so that the
disclosing party may obtain a protective order or equivalent and provided that the
receiving party shall comply with any such protective order or equivalent;
iv. not to disclose or release such Confidential Information to any third person without
the prior written consent of the disclosing party, except for authorized employees or
agents of the receiving party who have a need to know such information for the
purpose of performance under this Agreement and exercising its rights under this
Agreement, and who are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as protective
of the disclosing party’s Confidential Information as this Agreement; and
v. to take such actions as may be reasonably necessary to enforce its agreements with
its employees and agents, including commencing legal proceedings.
9. General
(a) Mediation. The parties agree to submit any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of
or relating to this Agreement or the relationship created by this Agreement to non-binding
mediation before bringing a claim, controversy or dispute in a court or before any other tribunal.
The mediation is to be conducted by either an individual mediator or a mediator appointed by
mediation services mutually agreeable to the parties. Such mediator shall be knowledgeable in
Page 152
software system agreements. The mediation shall take place at a time and location which is also
mutually agreeable; provided; however, in no event shall the mediation occur later than ninety
(90) days after either party notifies the other of its desire to have a dispute be placed before a
mediator. The costs and expenses of mediation, including compensation and expenses of the
mediator (and except for the attorneys fees incurred by either party), is to be shared by the parties
equally. If the parties are unable to resolve the claim, controversy or dispute within ninety (90)
days after the date either party provides the other notice of mediation, then either party may
bring and initiate a legal proceeding to resolve the claim, controversy or dispute unless the time
period is extended by a written agreement of the parties. Nothing in this Section shall inhibit a
party’s right to seek injunctive relief at any time.
(b) Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be given to any party to this Agreement shall
be given in writing and shall be delivered personally, mailed by prepaid registered post or sent
by facsimile to the appropriate address or facsimile number set out below. Any such notice shall
be conclusively deemed to have been given and received on the day on which it is delivered or
transmitted (or on the next succeeding business day if delivered or received by facsimile after
5:00 p.m. local time on the date of delivery or receipt, or if delivered or received by facsimile on
a day other than a business day), if personally delivered or sent by facsimile or, if mailed, on the
third business day following the date of mailing, and addressed, in the case of Harris, to:
N. HARRIS COMPUTER CORPORATION
1 Antares Drive, Suite 400
Ottawa, Ontario K2E 8C4
Attention: CEO
Telephone: 613-226-5511, extension 2149
and in the case of the Organization, to:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attn: Trina Valdez
Each party may change its particulars respecting notice, by issuing notice to the other party in the
manner described in this Section 7(b).
(c) Assignment. Neither party may assign any of its rights or duties under this Agreement
without the prior written consent of the other party, such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld, except that either party may assign to a successor entity in the event of its dissolution,
acquisition, sale of substantially all of its assets, merger or other change in legal status. The
Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties to this Agreement and
their respective successors and permitted assigns.
(d) Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the
parties hereto with respect to the matters covered herein. No other understandings, agreements,
Page 153
representations, warranties or other matters, oral or written, purportedly agreed to or represented
by or on behalf of Harris by any of its employees or agents, or contained in any sales materials or
brochures, shall be deemed to bind the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.
Organization acknowledges that it is entering into this Agreement solely on the basis of the
representations contained herein. The terms of this Agreement may not be changed except by an
amendment signed by an authorized representative of each party. No provisions in any purchase
orders, or in any other documentation employed by or on behalf of the Organization in
connection with this Agreement, regardless of the date of such documentation, will affect the
terms of this Agreement, even if such document is accepted by Harris, with such provisions
being deemed deleted.
(e) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the province of
Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. This Agreement excludes that body
of law applicable to choice of law, the Uniform Commercial Code and the United Nations
Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (UNCCISG and any legislation
implementing such Convention), if otherwise applicable.
(f) Trial by Jury. Organization and Harris hereby waive, to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable law, the right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim filed by any
party, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement or
any acts or omissions of Harris in connection therewith or contemplated thereby.
(g) Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision or covenant contained
in this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision or
covenant herein contained and any such invalid provision or covenant shall be deemed modified
to the extent necessary in order to render such provision valid and enforceable; if such provision
may not be so saved, it shall be severed and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.
(h) Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a
waiver of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent breach of the same or any other provisions hereof,
and no waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized
representative of the waiving party.
(i) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (whether by facsimile
or PDF signature or otherwise), each of which when so executed shall constitute an original and
all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(j) Relationship. The parties are and shall at all times remain, independent contractors in
the performance of this Agreement and nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture,
partnership or agency relationship between the parties. Neither party will have the power to bind
the other party or to contract in the name of or create any liability against the other party in any
way for any purpose. Neither party will be responsible for the acts or defaults of the other party
or of those for whom the other party is in law responsible.
Page 154
(k) Allocation of Risk. Organization acknowledges that the limited warranties, disclaimers
and limitations of liability contained in this Agreement are fundamental elements of the basis of
bargain between Organization and Harris and set forth an allocation of risk reflected in the fees
and payments due hereunder.
(l) Force Majeure. No default, delay or failure to perform on the part of Harris shall be
considered a breach of this Agreement where such default, delay or failure is due to a force
majeure or to circumstances beyond its control. Such circumstances will include, without
limitation, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, actions or inactions concerning government
authorities, epidemics, war, terrorist acts, embargoes, severe weather, fire, earthquakes, acts of
God or the public enemy or default of a common carrier or other disasters or events.
(m) Survival. The following sections and articles shall survive the termination or expiration
of this Agreement: Sections 2(c), 3, 4, 5(b), 6-8 and any other provisions which are required to
ensure that the parties fully exercise their rights and obligations hereunder.
Authorization
Signature indicates the parties have read, understood, and agreed to all the contents of this
Scope of Work for Advanced Managed Services.
When accepted, and except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this quote will be
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of The Software License and Implementation
Agreement and The Support Agreement entered into November 1, 2012, as and if amended.
Page 155
Authorized By:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Authorized By:
Advanced Utility Systems
Signature: Signature:
Name:
Title:
Name:
Title:
Date: Date:
Page 156
12 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCHEDULE A – ADVANCED MANAGED SERVICES (AMS) ....................................................................................... 13
KEY ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 15
AMS - SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................................ 17
1. ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 17
2. BUSINESS PROCESS REVIEW ................................................................................................................................... 18
3. REGRESSION TESTING – CIS INFINITY ....................................................................................................................... 19
SCHEDULE B – FEES AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE .................................................................................................... 21
SCHEDULE C – REGRESSION TESTING - TEST ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................... 22
Page 157
13 | P a g e
Schedule A – Advanced Managed Services (AMS)
Welcome to Advanced Managed Services (AMS) offering, designed to elevate your experience with CIS Infinity. We understand the daily
challenges faced by utilities like yours—increasing customer expectations, demands for efficiency, and the imperative to innovate. CIS
Infinity stands as your trusted Customer Information Systems and Utility Billing Solution, and AMS ensures your system remains at its peak
performance.
AMS is an exceptional service offered by Advanced Utility Systems ("Advanced") to ensure that our valued customers consistently stay
updated with the latest CIS Infinity builds. Some of the benefits of AMS includes the following:
• Financial Efficiency
o Redirect staff to strategic initiatives with reduced testing hours for new builds.
• Enhanced System Performance
o Tap into the expertise of our seasoned AMS team, ensuring swift system responses.
• Continuous Process Improvement
o Conduct thorough business process audits to optimize CIS features in use.
o Stay ahead with timely updates and feature enhancements.
By partnering with AMS, you empower your utility team to focus on delivering exceptional services while we safeguard and enhance your
CIS Infinity investment. Enjoy unparalleled access to dedicated resources committed to your long-term success.
Let AMS handle the intricacies of CIS Infinity management so your team can innovate and excel. Together, we'll navigate the evolving
landscape of utility services with confidence.
This document describes the Scope of Work (SOW) to be delivered by Advanced, as well as defines the principal activities and deliverables of both
Advanced and City of Rancho Cucamonga (“Rancho”).
The services as outlined in this Scope of Work (SOW) encompasses all aspects of Advanced’s AMS offering, including but not limited to
Account Management, CIS Infinity build regression testing of Racho’s CIS Infinity system, and one onsite or remote BPR per 12 month term.
At a summary level, Advanced will provide the following services:
Page 158
14 | P a g e
1. Dedicated Account Management
▪ Forge a personal relationship with your AMS Consultant
▪ Regular one-on-one calls to address your unique needs
▪ Build Update Planning
▪ Annual Review of build logs and Enhancement Addendums
▪ Detailed reports on enhancements
2. Annual Business Process Review (BPR)
▪ Annual business process review to optimize operations
▪ Remote or Onsite BPR (Rancho to cover travel expenses)
▪ Detailed documentation of BPR Recommendations
3. Comprehensive CIS Administration
▪ Seamless application of new CIS builds tailored to your requirements
▪ Rigorous regression testing in your test environment for reliability
▪ Priority support for critical CIS Infinity issues, supplementing standard Support
▪ Updated Regression Test Systems data with the copy from Production system
Page 159
15 | P a g e
Key Assumptions
1. All prices are quoted in US dollars.
2. The Fixed Cost will be firm for the services identified herein. Travel costs will be billed as incurred in accordance with the Managed
Service Agreement or as agreed to in writing by both parties.
3. Regression testing services are provided for build updates within a Version (e.g. Version 4.1.64 to 4.1.67). Regression testing services
for a Version Upgrade (e.g. Version 3.x to Version 4.x or Version 4.x to Version 5.x) are excluded and will require a separate SOW.
4. Regression testing as defined in Schedule C is included for up to two builds per 12-month term.
5. Rancho will provide the server including the required system software to host two CIS Infinity test systems (1. Current Build, 2. New
Build) to be used by Advanced for regression testing purposes. The two test systems can either be on one server (with enough
resources to host two systems) or can be hosted on each separate server.
6. Rancho will provide one (1) back up copy of their Production database, as well as a full copy of the CIS Application folder, for Advanced
to create two test systems specified in point 5.
7. Advanced will install two CIS Infinity test systems (1. Current Build, 2. New Build).
8. Regression Test environments are for the exclusive use of Advanced’s personnel to ensure the validity of test results.
9. Rancho will provide Advanced with direct remote access to its servers. Any form of secure (VPN) connection that will allow Advanced
to remotely connect with either a temporary or permanent login credentials (at least) during the setup and regression testing. Rancho
can choose to restrict the availability of the connection (ex. only keep it open when needed).
10. Rancho will provide Advanced with administrative access on the AMS test server/s including database administrative access on the
database server where the test databases are going to be hosted.
11. Builds will be applied by Advanced in one production and two non-production (AMS and regular Test) systems.
Page 160
16 | P a g e
12. All AMS services are provided between 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM Eastern.
13. Rancho will be required to participate in a remote Discovery session to assist in defining regression testing data set (e.g. Billing Cycle to
be tested).
14. Rancho specific stored procedures and or database triggers are excluded from the regression testing scope.
15. It is Rancho's responsibility to test all other functions within CIS Infinity not tested by Advanced under this SOW, before authorizing
application of a build to your Production system.
16. Rancho must provide written authorization before Advanced will apply a new build to Rancho’s Production system.
Page 161
17 | P a g e
AMS - Scope of Work
The following services will be provided annually to Rancho, provided that Rancho has an effective Advanced Managed Services agreement.
1. Account Management
Advanced will schedule annual reviews of the Build Logs and Enhancement Addendums with Rancho. Advanced and Rancho will
work together to determine which Builds will be applied during the 12-month term and the timing for testing and applying a build (i.e.
a Build Plan). In addition, Advanced will schedule a regular call with Rancho to review the outstanding tickets/issues.
Advanced DELIVERABLES:
• Lead annual review of Build Logs and Enhancement Addendums
• Jointly develop a Build Plan
• Document Build Plan
• Review outstanding tickets/issues, coordinate internally with the Advanced Technical team for resolution
Rancho DELIVERABLES:
• Participate in annual review of Build Logs and Enhancement Addendum
• Jointly develop a Build Plan
• Participate on the regular call to review outstanding tickets/issues
Page 162
18 | P a g e
2. Business Process Review
Advanced will conduct one, remote or 4-day onsite Business Process Review (BPR), each 12-month term, on a date mutually agreed
by Advanced and Rancho. Advanced will review key meter to cash business processes with Rancho staff and document
recommendations for improvements to current processes. Rancho will provide the resources and the information that Advanced will
require to perform a successful BPR. Implementation of changes are at the discretion of Rancho and may require a separate SOW,
depending on scope, if Advanced assistance is required.
Advanced DELIVERABLES:
• Deliver remote or onsite BPR
• Document recommendations
Page 163
19 | P a g e
Rancho DELIVERABLES:
• Participate in BPR sessions
• Provide documentation of current business processes, where available
3. Regression Testing – CIS Infinity
Advanced will perform regression testing activities as defined in Schedule C below for up to two builds per 12-month term using
Rancho’s data which resides on Rancho’s test servers. Advanced will perform a manual testing procedures. Rancho is responsible
for any additional testing activity not defined in Schedule C.
Advanced will compare data between the 2 test systems at a detail table and record level, for each test activity and will present a
summary of results including explanation of any valid discrepancies. Invalid differences will be corrected by Advanced prior to, when
possible, releasing the system to Rancho.
Through a Discovery process, Advanced will work with Rancho to identify data to be used in testing.
Advanced DELIVERABLES:
• Lead Discovery Session
• Apply Builds Required to Conduct Regression Testing
• Perform Regression Testing Activities as outlined in Schedule C
• Resolve and Testing Errors/Discrepancies
• Document Testing Results
Page 164
20 | P a g e
Rancho DELIVERABLES:
• Participate in Discovery Session
• Provide hardware and install and configure associated system and database software required for regression testing,
specifically two test environments. (Test 1 – Current Build, and Test 2 – New Build)
• Provide Administrative access to the regression test database servers
• Provide data files identified during Discovery (e.g. meter readings) required for regression testing
• Assist Advanced, as needed, in resolution of Testing Errors/Discrepancies
• Test any processes not included in Schedule C that Rancho deems important before applying a build to production
• Authorization to apply a Build to production
Page 165
21 | P a g e
Schedule B – Fees and Payment Schedule
The total annual fee for the Advanced Managed Services is $56,304.00 USD due on August 1, 2025.
This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of five (5) years, ending on July 31, 2030 (the “Initial
Term”). Upon expiration of the Initial Term, this Agreement may be renewed for an additional term of two (2) years (the “Renewal Term”),
unless one party gives written notice to the other party not less than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the current term of its intention not to
renew. And where the notice of non-renewal has not been provided in accordance with the terms, Rancho is obliged to pay the annual
recurring AMS fee for the then applicable one-year term. The Initial Term and the Renewal Terms shall collectively be referred to as the
“Term”.
Travel-related expenses are not included in the Annual Fee. Travel will be billed as incurred per the terms of the Managed Services
Agreement.
Under no circumstances shall Advanced Utility Systems be liable for any special, indirect, consequential, punitive, or incidental damages of
any kind and shall not be liable for loss of profits, works stoppage, system failure or malfunction, loss of data or any other damages or losses
in connection with this statement of work, even if Advanced Utility Systems has been advised of the possibility of such damages. In any
event, Advanced Utility Systems shall not be liable to pay any amount, in the aggregate, that is greater than the fees received by Advanced
Utility Systems under this statement of work.
Page 166
22 | P a g e
Schedule C – Regression Testing - Test Activities
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
Meter Reading Export ▪ Generate one meter reading export file
Meter Reading Import ▪ Import one meter reading file
Pre-Exceptions ▪ Generate Pre-Exceptions for one Bill Cycle
Cycle Billing ▪ Generate one billing batch from Meter Reading Import File
▪ Enter manual read on one “Estimate” exception type
▪ Select an account in batch, create a Transaction Batch, add adjustment and update batch
▪ Check for new Transactions
▪ Transfer Exceptions
▪ Journal – Batch with No Exceptions
▪ Merge Exceptions
▪ Journal Merged Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
Shared Billing ▪ Generate one billing batch from Shared/Online Billing Meter Reading Import File
▪ Transfer Accounts Ready to Print to Batch
▪ Original Batch - Change bill status to Ready to Print and Ignore Exceptions for all accounts in filter
▪ Select Import and choose the remaining book for the selected cycle and change the reading and billing
date by at least one day
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
Manual Billing
▪ Meter Change Out ▪ Perform one Meter Change Out
▪ Create one manual bill batch and add account with meter change
▪ Proration ▪ Add one account and change reading date for less than 30 days to create short bill and trigger pro-
ration
▪ Add one account and change reading for more than 30 days to create long bill and trigger pro-ration
▪ First Bill ▪ Add one account created from New Services to trigger first bill
Page 167
23 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
Cancel Billing ▪ Select one account updated in cycle batch and flag to cancel as whole
▪ Create Cancel Bill batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Cancel and Rebill ▪ Select one account updated in cycle batch and flag to cancel & rebill, enter new readings and reading
date
▪ Create Cancel & Rebill batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
Moves & Final Billing
▪ Vacant ▪ Select existing customer - Account 2
▪ Move Account 2 into a new account (Account 1); back date move 1 week, transfer balance, leave
Account 2 vacant
▪ Auto Owner ▪ Move out Account 3 (Auto Owner) out; back date move 1 week
▪ Final Bills ▪ Create one Final Bill Batch
▪ Add Account 1, 2, 3 and ensure none are set to no bill, enter meter read
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
▪ Final Bill - Occupancy Charge ▪ Locate Occupancy Charge batch generated by Final Bill batch, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Final Bill - Balance Transfer ▪ Locate Balance Transfer batch generated by Final Bill batch, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Final Bill - Deposit Transfer ▪ Locate one customer who has an A/R Balance and a Deposit Paid Balance and is Active on 2 Accounts
▪ Move Out this customer from 1st Account, with balance transfers to the Customer’s 2nd Account and
Move In a new Customer to 1st Account
Page 168
24 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
▪ Final bill the Customer.
▪ Locate Balance Transfer batch generated by Final Bill batch, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Final Bill - Apply Deposit and
‘Reverse Unpaid Deposit
▪ Locate one customer who has a deposit paid balance and another where there is a deposit owing
balance (could be on a single customer/account)
▪ Move out the customer leaving the account vacant
▪ Final bill the customer and check the ‘Charges’ tab on the bill.
▪ Auto Final Bills ▪ Move one new customer into Vacant account (Account 2); use current date, Deposit Quote
▪ Move in existing customer (Account 4) into Account 3; use current date, balance transfer
▪ Move new customer into Account 5
▪ Add Auto Final Bill reading to Account 2, 3, 4, 5
▪ Create Auto Final Bill Batch
▪ Ensure Account 2, 3, 4 and 5 are brought in and none are set to no bill
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Print Bills
▪ Update Batch
▪ Auto Final Bills - Occupancy Charge ▪ Locate Occupancy Charge batch generated by Auto Final Bill batch, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Auto Final Bills - Occupancy Charge
– Vacant Move In
▪ Execute Vacant Account Move In Processing
▪ Locate Occupancy Charge batch generated by Vacant Account Move in, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Auto Final Bills - Balance Transfer ▪ Locate Balance Transfer batch generated by Auto Final Bill batch, in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Auto Finals - Deposit Quote ▪ Execute Deposit Quote Processing
▪ Locate Deposit Quote batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Delete Move In – New Customer ▪ Go to Account 5 and delete move (Account 5 should now be Inactive)
Page 169
25 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
▪ Move Multiplier with Customer (if
applicable)
▪ Note: Applicable where Basic Multiplier Control form is configured for a multiplier to move with
Customer.
▪ Locate one Active Customer/Account with these multipliers (CUST/ACCT1)
▪ Select one other Customer/Account that has the same Service (CUST/ACCT2), Move Out the
CUST/ACCT2 and Move In CUST/ACCT1
▪ Move Payment Plan with Customer
(if applicable)
▪ Note: Applicable if the ‘Move Scenario Control’ is configured to Copy Existing Pap Data’ for the Move In
scenario type.
▪ Locate one ‘Active’ Customer/Account which has a Payment Plan (CUST/ACCT3)
▪ Move in one Customer (CUST/ACCT3) to another account (CUST/ACCT4)
Payment Import ▪ Create one Transaction Batch
▪ Import one payment file
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Cash Register ▪ Create one Cash Register Batch
▪ Add one account by customer #, pay full amount
▪ Add one account by account #, pay partial amount
▪ Add one customer with multiple active accounts
▪ Add one account by Search, pay full amount, change transaction code
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Create one Cash Register batch
▪ Add one account by customer #, pay bill full amount by cash
▪ Add one account by account, pay partial amount by check
▪ Add one account by search, pay partial amount by cash and balance by check
▪ Add one account by account, pay in full by credit card
▪ Add one customer with multiple accounts, pay bill full amount check
▪ Add customer with multiple account, pay partial amount by cash
▪ Delete one account
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Create one Cash Register Batch
▪ Add one account by account, pay partial amount to specific AR(s) to override payment allocation
Page 170
26 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
▪ Add one account, pay by cash where change will be given
▪ Add one POS transaction
▪ Add one GL transaction
▪ Edit one Cash Register batch and edit Cash Register Amount to be a 1¢ difference Cash tender
▪ Balance Cash Register
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Adjustments
▪ Create one Adjustment Transaction Batch
▪ Add one debit adjust to account
▪ Add one credit adjust to account
▪ Add one account and change transaction code
▪ Add one account used in Cash Register and process NSF selecting original transaction
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Late Payment Charges ▪ Execute Penalty Processing
▪ Locate Late Charges batch in Cash Processing
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Notices ▪ Create one Notice Batch for a selected cycle - Notice date = date of 1st pending notice for the previous
bill (May/May Not be Notice 1 date)
▪ Execute Removed Listing
▪ Execute Notice Listing
▪ Print Notices (if applicable)
▪ Update batch
▪ Creation of Notice Charges cash batch (if configured in Collection Notice Control form)
o Created as a result of Notices Batch Update
Arrangement Processing ▪ Add single arrangement to Account 6 using current date
▪ Add group arrangement to Account 7, process as group starting with current date
▪ Add group arrangement to Account 8, not processed as group starting with current date
▪ Add single arrangement to Account 9 using future date
▪ Add single arrangement to Account 10 using current date
1. Create one pending cash batch
Page 171
27 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
2. Add a payment in full to Pending Cash Batch for Account 6
3. Arrangement Processing Pickup
4. Add single arrangement to Account 11 using current date
5. Add group arrangement to Account 12, process as group starting with current date
6. Add group arrangement to Account 13, not processed as group starting with current date
7. Add single arrangement to Account 14 using future date
8. Add single arrangement to Account 15 using current date
9. Add a payment in full to Pending Cash Batch created for Account 11
10. Run Arrangement Processing from the Collection Processing form
Collections Processing
▪ Disconnection ▪ Update all Broken Arrangement accounts to Collection Status of Pending Disconnect
▪ Create Transaction Batch
▪ Add full payment to Transaction Batch for one Account with Pending Disconnect
▪ Generate Field Actions
▪ Add full payment for one Account with “Disconnect Service Order Generated” Collection Status
▪ Reconnection ▪ Select 2 accounts and add Disconnect records
▪ Add partial payment (below min for reconnection) for 1st Account
▪ Add full payment for 2nd Account
▪ Bankruptcy (if applicable) ▪ Select one account with amount owing and add a bankruptcy record for current date
▪ Select a second account with amount owing and add bankruptcy with older file date
▪ Locate Bankruptcy batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Write Off Processing ▪ Execute Write Off Processing – Write Off
▪ Locate Write Off batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Credit Refund (if applicable) ▪ Execute Write Off Processing – Credit Refund Pickup
▪ Locate Credit Refund batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Refund file
Page 172
28 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
▪ Collection Agency (if applicable) ▪ Execute Write Off Processing - Collection Agency Pickup
▪ Locate Collection Agency batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
▪ Collection Agency file
Deposit Quote ▪ Execute Deposit Quote Processing
▪ Locate Deposit Quote batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Deposit Interest ▪ Execute one Deposit Interest Processing
▪ Locate Deposit Interest batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Deposit Refund ▪ Execute one Deposit Refund Processing
▪ Locate Deposit Refund batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
PAP/ACH Pickup ▪ Execute one ACH/PAP Processing
▪ Locate PAP/ACH Batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Create Bank File
▪ Update Batch
Request/Adjust Transaction Pickup ▪ Execute one Transaction Request Transaction Processing
▪ Locate Request Transaction batch in Transaction Batch
▪ Journal Batch
▪ Update Batch
Service Orders ▪ Add one SO to an account from CAI/AccountView, print on Save
▪ Add one SO to an account from CAI/AccountView, do NOT print on Save
▪ Add one SO from Service Order Management form
▪ Complete one SO using completion code to trigger action
Page 173
29 | P a g e
Functional Area/Process Test Activity
Reporting
▪ Customer Account Reports ▪ Compare Single AR Summary filtered to one specific cycle
▪ Compare Single AR Detail filtered to one specific cycle
▪ Compare Multiple AR Summary filtered to one specific cycle
▪ Compare Multiple AR Listing to one specific cycle
▪ GL Reports ▪ Compare GL Element Monthly Summary filtered to one specific month/year
▪ Compare GL Element Monthly Detail filtered to one date range
▪ Compare Transaction Daily Summary filtered to one specific date
▪ Aged Arrears ▪ Compare Detailed filtered to one specific AR, one account status, one account type and one cycle
▪ Compare Summary filtered to one specific AR, one account status, one account type and one cycle
Letter Management ▪ Add one letter to one account
▪ Print Letter
Customer Account
Inquiry/AccountView
▪ Compare Information displayed in the Information Band for one Customer Account in the
CAI/AccountView form, Billing Batch form, and Cash Register Batch form
▪ Verify that able to access all Tabs in the CAI/AccountView form
▪ Verify that able to all grids in the CAI/AccountView form display
▪ Verify all buttons function in CAI/AccountView Navigation Tool Bar
▪ Advanced Search – Execute 5 saved Filters/Searches in CAI/AccountView and validate results are the
same
Page 174
SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 1st day of January, 2026.
BETWEEN:
N. HARRIS COMPUTER CORPORATION
(“Harris”)
-and –
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
(“Organization”)
RECITALS
1.Harris has licensed to Organization certain Software pursuant to a Software
License Agreement;
2.The Organization wishes to receive support and maintenance services related to the
Software;
3.Harris shall provide the support and maintenance services related to the Software;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set out in this
support and maintenance agreement (the “Support and Maintenance Agreement”) and for
other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged), the parties agree as follows:
1.Defined terms:
(1)“Release” means an Update and an Upgrade.
(2)“Software” means the software products that are listed in Exhibit 1 and
includes any Update(s) or Upgrade(s) that have been provided to
Organization. Third Party Software is not included in the definition of Software
except where this License Agreement explicitly states otherwise.
(3)“Update” means any published changes, additions or corrections to the
Software that primarily include a minor modification or enhancement to the
Software related to a bug fix, minor additional functionality or legislative
changes. An Update is designated by a change in the right-most digit in the
version number (for example, a change from X.1 to X.2).
(4)“Upgrade” means a major overhaul of the Software which is a complete new
published version of the Software that modifies, revises or alters the Software
and adds features, functionality or enhancements to such Software. An
Upgrade is designated by a change in the number to the left of the decimal
point in the version number (for example, a change from 1.X to 2.X.
2025-085
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 175
2. This Support and Maintenance Agreement is the exclusive statement of the entire
support and maintenance agreement between Harris and Organization.
3. Harris shall provide software support primarily via telephone and electronic mail in
addition to site visits only when necessary. The support services will be provided
only during the hours of operation as described in Exhibit 2 hereto and which are in
effect as of the Start Date (January 1, 2026), as such services may, at Harris’s sole
discretion, be modified or supplemented from time to time. To enable Harris to provide
effective support, the Organization will establish auto remote access procedures
compatible with Harris’s then current practices which may be revised over time.
4. This Support and Maintenance Agreement becomes effective from the date hereof.
5. In consideration for the support services specified in Section 2, Organization shall pay
the “Support and Maintenance Fee” as detailed in Exhibit 1 below. The Support and
Maintenance Fee will be billed annually in advance each year of the Term (including
any renewals or extensions) beginning on the Start Date and thereafter on the
anniversary of the Start Date or on an alternative date mutually agreed to by both
parties. Harris may change the Support and Maintenance Fee from time to time on
each one-year anniversary of the Agreement during its Term (including any renewal
terms) but Organization shall only be billed once per year.
6. In addition to the Support and Maintenance Fee, Organization shall reimburse Harris
for its direct expenses in providing support services (“Billable Fees”) pursuant to this
Agreement which include:
(i) its direct travel expenses which are excluded from the total fees amount
described in the Statement of Work, including, but not limited to hotel, airfare,
car rental, tolls, parking and airline and travel agent fees;
(ii) courier services, photocopying, faxing and reproduction, all reasonable travel
costs (hotel and airfare) including a travel time rate of $75.00 per hour;
(iii) a per diem rate of $70.00 for week days and a $140.00 for weekends and
statutory holidays that includes all meal, food and telecommunications
expenses (no receipts will be provided);
(iv) a mileage charge based on the current U.S. Internal Revenue Service
recommended rate per mile, long distance telephone calls; and
(v) all other reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of Harris's duties
including courier services and documentation copying or production.
7. Harris may update its reimbursement policies and rates related to the Billable Fees
from time to time, in which case such updated policies shall apply for purposes of this
Agreement, provided that such updated reimbursement policies must generally apply
to all clients of Harris.
8. Harris shall supply all Updates to Organization at no additional charge other than
the payment of the Support and Maintenance Fee. Updates and Upgrades may require
additional services to be performed by Harris outside of the scope of those services
provided by Harris including additional training not covered by any agreement(s) for
the installation and implementation of the Update and Upgrades that will be subject to
the Harris’s then-prevailing policies, terms and Billable Fees related to pricing and
hourly rates. All such services shall be performed subject to a newly negotiated Scope
Page 176
of Work.
9. All Updates of the Software and all those services listed in Exhibit 2 which are
included as part of Organization’s Software support will be made available to
Organization at no additional charge, except where Exhibit 2 expressly indicates that
a service is billable. Such services will otherwise be covered under the Support and
Maintenance Fees.
10. All payments hereunder shall be in U.S. dollars and shall be net of any taxes, tariffs
or other governmental charges. Harris shall be responsible for paying all taxes, fees,
assessments and premiums of any kind payable on its employees and operations. Any
tax Harris may be required to collect or pay upon the sale, use or delivery of the support
and maintenance services described in this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall
be paid by Organization and such sums shall be due and payable to Harris upon
receipt of an invoice therefore. Any taxes levied in relation to the services required for
a Release shall be paid by Organization. For the sake of clarity, all of the fees listed in
this Support and Maintenance Agreement are not inclusive of any applicable taxes: the
Organization shall be responsible for the payment of any applicable duties and
sales/consumption taxes.
11. The initial term of this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall be five (5) years.
Upon expiration of the initial term, this Support and Maintenance Agreement may
be renewed for an additional term of two (2) years, unless terminated by either party
upon giving to the other not less than 90 days’ notice in writing prior to the end of
the initial term or any subsequent anniversary of such date. Organization shall pay the
then prevailing Support and Maintenance Fee in advance for each term of the Support
and Maintenance Agreement and where the notice of non-renewal has not been
provided in accordance with these terms, the Organization is obliged to pay the
Support and Maintenance Fee for the then applicable term; notwithstanding the
foregoing, all ongoing annual support and maintenance fees are subject to five percent
(5%) annual increase, or Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI—U),
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area, whichever is greater. The CPI-U used
for adjustments shall be the CPI-U last officially published at the time of invoicing
prior to the last day of each applicable year of the term (whether initial or any renewal
period), as applicable, whether such CPI-U has been published on a monthly, quarterly,
semi-annual, or other basis. The termination of this Support and Maintenance
Agreement by Organization shall not affect the existing license agreement(s). Harris
shall neither refund any Support and Maintenance Fees nor any Billable Fees if this
Support and Maintenance Agreement is terminated. Organization acknowledges that
if this Support and Maintenance Agreement is terminated, then it will not be eligible
to receive the benefits of this Support and Maintenance Agreement including the right
to Releases or to access the source code in escrow upon the occurrence of any event of
default.
12. Title to and ownership of all proprietary rights in the Releases and all related
proprietary information supplied by Harris in providing the services pursuant to
this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall at all times remain with Harris, and
Organization shall acquire no proprietary rights by virtue of this Support and
Maintenance Agreement.
13. Harris shall have the right to terminate this Support and Maintenance Agreement
Page 177
immediately if:
(a) Organization attempts to assign this Support and Maintenance Agreement or
any of its rights hereunder without complying with the relevant license
agreement; or
(b) Organization has not paid an invoice within ninety (90) days of the start
of a renewal term.
14. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, all notices required hereunder shall be made
in accordance with the provisions of the relevant license agreement.
15. Either party’s lack of enforcement of any provision in this Support and Maintenance
Agreement in the event of a breach by the other shall not be construed to be a waiver
of any such provision and the non-breaching party may elect to enforce any such
provision in the event of any repeated or continuing breach by the other.
16. The parties agree that the terms and conditions contained herein shall prevail
notwithstanding any variations on any orders, e-mails or other correspondence
submitted by Organization.
17. The particular provisions of this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall be
deemed confidential in nature and neither Organization nor Harris shall divulge any of
its provisions as set forth herein to any third party except as may be required by law.
18. (a) Termination of this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall not affect any
right of action of either party arising from anything which was done or not
done, as the case may be, prior to the termination taking effect.
(b) The Organization and Harris recognize that circumstances may arise entitling
the Organization to damages for breach or other fault on the part of Harris
arising from this Support and Maintenance Agreement. The parties agree that
in all such circumstances the Organization’s remedies and Harris’s liabilities
will be limited as set forth below and that these provisions will survive
notwithstanding the termination or other discharge of the obligations of the
parties under this Support and Maintenance Agreement.
(c) FOR BREACH OR DEFAULT BY HARRIS OR OTHERWISE IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT, INCLUDING A BREACH OR DEFAULT ENTITLING
THE ORGANIZATION TO RESCIND OR BE DISCHARGED FROM THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT,
THE ORGANIZATION’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, IN ADDITION TO
ELECTING IF SO ENTITLED TO RESCIND OR BE DISCHARGED
FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT, SHALL BE PAYMENT BY HARRIS OF THE
ORGANIZATION’S DIRECT DAMAGES TO A MAXIMUM AMOUNT
EQUAL TO, AND HARRIS SHALL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE IN THE
AGGREGATE ONE (1) MILLION DOLLARS.
(d) IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY DAMAGES INCLUDE, NOR SHALL
HARRIS BE LIABLE FOR, ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR
Page 178
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES EVEN IF HARRIS HAS BEEN ADVISED
OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF. WITHOUT LIMITING THE
GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, HARRIS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE
FOR LOST PROFITS, LOST BUSINESS REVENUE, FAILURE TO
REALIZE EXPECTED SAVINGS, OTHER COMMERCIAL OR
ECONOMIC LOSS OF ANY KIND, OR FOR ANY CLAIM
WHATSOEVER AGAINST THE ORGANIZATION BY ANY OTHER
PARTY.
(e) CLAUSES (i) AND (ii) SHALL APPLY IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM,
DEMAND OR ACTION BY THE ORGANIZATION IRRESPECTIVE OF
THE NATURE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION UNDERLYING SUCH
CLAIM, DEMAND OR ACTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
BREACH OF CONTRACT, RESCISSION OF CONTRACT, OR TORT.
19. The parties hereby confirm that the waivers and disclaimers of liability, releases
from liability, limitations and apportionments of liability, and exclusive remedy
provisions expressed throughout this Support and Maintenance Agreement shall apply
even in the event of default, negligence (in whole or in part), strict liability or breach
of contract of the person released or whose liability is waived, disclaimed, limited,
apportioned or fixed by such remedy provision, and shall extend to such person’s
affiliates and to its shareholders, directors, officers, employees and affiliates.
20. Where remedies are expressly afforded by this Support and Maintenance
Agreement, such remedies are intended by the parties to be the sole and exclusive
remedies of the Organization for liabilities of the Harris arising out of or in connection
with this Support and Maintenance Agreement, notwithstanding any remedy
otherwise available at law or in equity.
21. This Agreement will be governed by the law of the state of California. In the event
of a dispute over this agreement, exclusive venue shall be in the United States District
Court in Rancho Cucamonga, California; provided, however, that if subject matter
jurisdiction is improper in said federal court, it shall be had in the Circuit Court in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The Uniform Computer Information
Transaction Act will not apply even if adopted as part of the laws of California. The
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
(UNCCISG) does not apply to this Agreement.
22. This Support and Maintenance Agreement may not be assigned by the
Organization unless, concurrently with any such assignment, the Organization assigns
its rights under, and complies with the provisions of the relevant license agreement.
23. This Support and Maintenance Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and
assigns of the parties and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assigns
of the parties.
24. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision or covenant contained in this
Support and Maintenance Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of
any other provision or covenant herein contained and any such invalid provision or
covenant shall be deemed to be modified to the extent necessary in order to render
such provision valid and enforceable; if such provision may not be so saved, it
Page 179
shall be severed and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. .
25. This Support and Maintenance Agreement may be executed in counterparts (whether
by facsimile signature or in PDF format via e-mail or otherwise), each of which when
so executed shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one
and the same agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Support and Maintenance
Agreement to be effective as of January 1, 2026.
N. HARRIS COMPUTER CORPORATION
Per:
Name:
Title:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Per:
Name:
Title:
Page 180
Exhibit 1
Annual Support and Maintenance Fee
Payment Schedule
January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
• CIS Infinity – annual fee………………………….………………… $60,245.27
• Infinity.Link – annual fee………………………….…………………$20,479.64
• Learning Management System (LMS) – annual fee…….………….$ 5,664.33
*10 maximum LMS users and 1 ticket for annual Harris Customer Training
Conference (HCTC)
These fees assume no additional licenses are added. In the event that additional licenses for
CIS Infinity are purchased, the Annual Support and Maintenance Fee will increase in
accordance with the license purchase fees.
Page 181
Exhibit 2
Standard Support and Maintenance Services – Standard Guidelines
The purpose of this Exhibit 2 is to provide our customers with information on our standard
coverage, the services which are included as part of your annual software support, a listing of call
priorities, an outline of our escalation procedures and other important details.
Harris reserves the right to make modifications to this document as required; provided, however,
Harris shall not reduce the scope of support provided hereunder without the prior consent of the
Organization.
The services listed below are services that are included as part of your software support.
• 800 Toll Free Telephone support
• Software for Life
- Guaranteed Support on your existing applications for life
- Scheduled assistance for installations, updates/upgrades and other special projects (there may
be charges depending on the scope of work)
• Technical troubleshooting and issue resolution
• E-mail support call logging and notification
• eSupport access 24 x 7 with the following on-line benefits:
- Log and close calls
- View and update calls
- Update contact information
- Access published documentation
- Access available downloads
- Access Support knowledge base
- Participate in Discussion Forums
• Standard software releases and updates
- Defect corrections (as warranted)
- Planned enhancements
- State and/or Federal mandated changes (charges may exist depending on scope)
- Participation in beta program
- Online Release notes
• Customer Care Program
- Quarterly News Letter
- Technical support check-ins
- Communication on new products and services
- On-site visits (as required)
• Design review for potential enhancements or custom modifications
• Ability to attend the annual customer conference (attendance fees apply)
Page 182
Help Desk Hours
Our standard hours of support are from 8:00 a.m. EST to 8:00 p.m. EST, Monday to Friday,
excluding designated statutory holidays. After-hours/emergency telephone support is available
outside of the standard hours for critical issues requiring immediate attention. Weekend and
holiday assistance is available and must be scheduled in advance and in most cases is billable.
Response Times
Response times will vary and are dependent on the priority of the call. We do our best to ensure
that we deal with incoming calls in the order that they are received, however calls will be
escalated based on the urgency of the issue reported. Our response time guidelines are as
follows:
Priority 1: 1 - 4 hours
Priority 2: 1 - 8 hours
Priority 3: 1 - 24 hours
Call Priorities
In an effort to assign our resources to incoming calls as effectively as possible, we have identified
three types of call priorities, 1, 2 and 3. A Priority 1 call is deemed by our support staff to be an
Urgent or High Priority call, Priority 2 is classified as a Medium Priority and Priority 3 is deemed
to be a Low Priority. The criteria used to establish guidelines for these calls are as follows:
Priority 1 – High
• Security issues
• System Down (Software Application, Hardware, Operating System, Database)
• Inability to process bills
• Program errors without workarounds
• Aborted postings or error messages preventing data integration and update
• Performance issues of severe nature impacting critical processes
Priority 2 - Medium
• System errors that have workarounds
• Reports calculation issues
• Printer related issues (related to interfaces with our software and not the printer itself)
• Hand-held issues not preventing billing
• Performance issues not impacting critical processes
• Usability issues
• Workstation connectivity issues (Workstation specific)
Priority 3 - Low
• Report formatting issues
• Training questions, how to, or implementing new processes
• Aesthetic issues
• Issues with workarounds
• Recommendations for enhancements on system changes
• Questions on documentation
Page 183
Call Process
All issues or questions reported to support are tracked via a support call or ticket; our support
analysts cannot provide assistance unless a support call or ticket is logged. Our current process
for logging calls and tickets includes the following: eSupport (via website), email, phone and fax.
• Your ticket must contain at a minimum: your organization name, contact person, software
product and version, module and/or menu selection, nature of issue, detailed description
of your question or issue and any other information you believe pertinent.
• Our ticketing system or one of our support analysts will provide you with a ticket ID to
track your issue.
• Your ticket will be assigned to the first available support representative.
• As the support representative assigned to your ticket investigates your issue, you will be
contacted and advised as to where the issue stands and the course of action that will be
taken for resolution. If we require additional information, you will be contacted by the
assigned support representative to supply the information required.
• All correspondence and actions associated with your ticket will be tracked in our support
ticketing system. At any time, if available to you, you may log onto our ticketing system
to see the status of your call.
• Once your issue has been resolved, you will receive an automated notification by email
that your ticket has been closed. This email will contain the entire event history of the
issue from the time the ticket was created and leading up to the resolution of the issue.
You also have the option of viewing both your open and closed tickets, if available to
you, via our support ticketing system.
• Contact the support department at your convenience for a status update on your
development issues, or log onto our ticketing system (if available to you) to view your
issues on-line.
Escalation Process
Our escalation process is defined below. This process has been put in place to ensure that issues
are being dealt with appropriately. If at any time you are not completely satisfied with the
resolution of your issue, you are encouraged to escalate with the support department as follows:
Level 1: Contact the Technical Analyst working on your issue
Level 2: Contact the Team Lead
Level 3: Contact the Manager of support
Level 4: Contact the Director, Vice President of support
Level 5: Contact the Executive Vice President
Page 184
Holiday Schedule
Below is a listing of statutory holidays. Please note that support services will be closed on
designated days as outlined below.
New Year's Day (January 1)
Family Day (3rd Monday in February; usually coincides with President’s Day)
Good Friday
Victoria Day (May, Monday preceding May 25th)
Canada Day (July 1)
Civic Holiday (August, first Monday)
Labour Day (same for USA and Canada)
Thanksgiving (Canada – 2nd Monday in October)
Christmas Eve (Early Closure)
Christmas Day (Dec 25)
Boxing Day (Dec 26)
New Year’s Eve (Early Closure)
Billable Support Services
The services listed below are services that are out of scope of your support and maintenance
agreement and are therefore considered billable services.
• Extended telephone training
• Forms redesign or creation (includes Bill Prints, Notice Prints and Letters)
• Setup and changes to interfaces or creation of new interface
• Setup of new services or changes to services (PAP, ACH, etc.)
• File imports/exports
• Custom modifications (reports, bills, forms, reversal of customizations)
• Setting up additional companies / agencies / tokens / general ledgers
• Data conversions / global modification to setup table data
• Database maintenance, repairs and optimization
• Installations / re-installations (workstations, servers)
Test Databases and Environments
We support customers in the maintenance of independent test environments for testing purposes.
This allows customers the opportunity to test fixes, modifications, new business processes and/or
scenarios without risking any potentially unwanted changes to the live environment.
Connection Methods
To ensure we can effectively support our clients, we require that a communication link is
established and maintained between our two sites. It is the Organization’s responsibility to
ensure the connection is valid at your location so that we can connect to your site and resolve any
issues. Our preferred method of connection is through Remote Desktop which can be
accomplished using a VPN account and the MS Windows Remote Desktop client or a variety of
remote connection tools (logmein.com, TeamViewer, join.me, VNC, etc). Harris will work with
the client to establish a mutually agreeable remote connection policy.
Page 185
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director
Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with Mariposa Landscape, Inc. for Park
Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance in the Amount of $974,922
for FY 2025/26. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council:
1. Award and authorize the execution of a professional services agreement for Park Mowing
and Facility Landscape Maintenance to Mariposa Landscapes Inc., of Irwindale,
California, effective October 1, 2025, for a one-year term with an option to renew in one
(1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years, in an amount not to exceed
$974,922 (City $844,922 and Fire $130,000) for FY 2025/26, and an estimated $7,762,435
over seven years, contingent upon approval of future budgets.
2. Authorize an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $974,922 for FY 2025/26.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests
for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive.
The updated specifications were submitted to the Procurement Division to prepare a formal
Request for Proposals (RFP). Procurement prepared and posted RFP #25/26-006 for Park
Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance. There were 369 vendors notified; 36 prospective
bidders downloaded or viewed the bid package, and eight (8) responses were received.
ANALYSIS:
An evaluation committee of City staff conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and
scored and ranked the eight (8) responsive proposals in accordance with the RFP evaluation
criteria listed in Table 1. Cost is just one factor in the evaluation of RFP responses; therefore the
low bidder will not necessarily be awarded a contract. Table 2. Reflects the vendor rankings.
Page 186
Page 2
2
9
8
0
Table 1. Evaluation Criteria for Written Proposals
Criteria Description Weight
Vendor Expertise 10%
Quality of proposed goods or services 15%
Extent to which the Vendor’s goods or services
meet the City’s and RCFPD’s needs
25%
Vendor’s history and resources available to
provide the required services
15%
Experience and professional qualifications of
staff
20%
Cost 15%
Table 2. Vendor Ranking with Cost for Written Proposals
Rank Vendor Score
1 Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.82
2 Greenfield Management 79
2 Colts Landscape, Inc.79
2 BrightView Landscape Services 79
3 Stay Green, Inc.72
4 New Generation Landscape Maintenance Inc.65
5 JAS Landscapes LLC 64
6 US Landscape Inc.53
Based on the ranking, Mariposa Landscapes, Inc of Irwindale, California was determined to be
the most responsive contract providing the best value while meeting the scope of services and
specifications required. Therefore, staff recommends City Council approve award and authorize
the execution of a professional services agreement for LMD-1 Parks Landscape and Maintenance
to Mariposa Landscapes Inc., of Irwindale, California, effective October 1, 2025 for a one-year
term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years, in
an amount not to exceed $974,922 for FY 2025/26, and an estimated $7,762,435 over seven
years, contingent upon approval of future budgets.
The charts below have been prepared to illustrate the estimated annual funding requirements for
the full contract term. Please note, this is only an estimate, and the amounts below could vary.
City Funding
Fiscal Year Prior Year Costs Est. Annual
Increase (4%)Est. Total Costs
FY 2025/26 Year 1 N/A $844,922
FY 2026/27 $844,922 $33,800 $878,722
FY 2027/28 $878,722 $35,150 $913,872
FY 2028/29 $913,872 $36,560 $950,432
FY 2029/30 $950,432 $38,020 $988,452
FY 2030/31 $988,452 $39,540 $1,027,992
FY 2031/32 $1,027,992 $41,120 $1,069,112
Estimated Grand Total $6,673,505
Page 187
Page 3
2
9
8
0
RCFPD Funding
Fiscal Year Prior Year Costs Est. Annual
Increase (4%)Est. Total Costs
FY 2025/26 Year 1 N/A $130,000
FY 2026/27 $130,000 $5,200 $135,200
FY 2027/28 $135,200 $5,410 $140,610
FY 2028/29 $154,670 $6,190 $160,860
FY 2029/30 $160,860 $6,440 $167,300
FY 2030/31 $167,300 $6,700 $174,000
FY 2031/32 $174,000 $6,960 $180,960
Estimated Grand Total $1,088,930
A copy of the proposed agreement is attached hereto.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved FY 25/26 Budget includes sufficient funding for Park Mowing and Facility
Landscape Maintenance in several contract services line items.
The contract spending limit of $974,922 includes a contingency of $76,810 for unforeseen work
resulting from wind events or other emergencies.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, while providing high quality outdoor spaces.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Proposed Agreement
Page 188
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC.
FOR
PARK MOWING AND FACILITY LANDSCAPE AND
MAINTENANCE
AWARD DATE: September 3, 2025
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-114
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 189
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of October, 2025,
by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“RCFPD”) and Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., a corporation
(“Contractor”).
RECITALS
A. City and RCFPD have heretofore issued their request for proposals to perform the
following services: Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance (RFP 25/26-006) (“the
Project”).
B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital “A”,
above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City and RCFPD desire to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set
forth and more fully described herein.
D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State
of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional
manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises,
covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Contractor’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
this Agreement, City and RCFPD hereby engage Contractor to perform all services described in
Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to landscape and irrigation maintenance;
all as more fully set forth in RFP 25/26-006, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Contractor’s proposal,
dated June 5, 2025 attached hereto as Exhibit B, and Schedule of Lump Sum and Unit Costs attached
hereto as Exhibit C, hereinafter entitled “Scope of Work”, and incorporated by reference herein. The
nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth in the
Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between
the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City and RCFPD, the
Contractor will promptly meet with City and RCFPD staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
desired by the City and RCFPD. Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or
revisions to Contractor’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-114
Page 190
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 2
not increase the total cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total
compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s Manager without
amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this
Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care,
and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in
a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “N/A”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City and RCFPD to enter into
this Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the
services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that it
shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor represents
that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated and considered
the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be
performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the
services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that Contractor, to the extent required by the
standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted
with the conditions therein. Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will
materially affect the performance of services, Contractor shall immediately inform City and RCFPD
of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor’s risk until written instructions are received
from the City and RCFPD Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall become effective as of the date
of the mutual execution by way of both party’s signature (the “Effective Date”) through June 30,
2026. No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has
been executed and requirements have been fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of six (6)
additional years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Prior to entering into an
agreement for an annual extension the Contractor may request a Cost-of-living Increase in an amount
not to exceed the increase in the March index of the Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers for
the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California area published by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject
to pricing review, and in accordance with all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise
provided in writing by the City and RCFPD.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not
exceed eight hundred forty-four thousand, nine hundred twenty-two dollars ($844,922) for
services during the City and RCFPD fiscal year ending June 30, 2026 and one hundred thirty
thousand dollars ($130,000) for services during the City and RCFPD fiscal year ending June 30,
2026, including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City
Page 191
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 3
Manager or City Council. City and RCFPD shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other
deductions.
However, City and RCFPD shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount
pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor
be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed, or goods or products not yet
received.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with
Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City and RCFPD shall compensate
Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
3.2 Compensation Limit. Maintenance and Repair Services. If the Services include
repair work, then the maximum compensation payable during the term of this Agreement, or any
renewal term, for work consisting of “repair”, is the lower of $60,000, or the amount set forth in
Section 3.1, above. See R.C.M.C Section 3.08.110.B. For avoidance of doubt, “maintenance”
includes, but is not limited to, routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of
any City or RCFPD owned or operated facility for its intended purposes. “Repair” work includes, but
is not limited to, non-routine, non-recurring, and/or work to maintain equipment or facilities that is
unexpected, and may include replacement of equipment or components thereof. See California Public
Contract Code Section 22002(d). It is Contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the cost of repair work
performed and invoiced by Contractor does not exceed the foregoing limit. Contractor shall consult
with City and RCFPD should Contractor have any question whether work is repair work prior to
performing the same.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City and RCFPD monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services
rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Repair work,
if any, shall be specifically identified, including all charges related thereto. Any invoice claiming
compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such
services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City and RCFPD shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City and RCFPD shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records
maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the
City and RCFPD.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City and RCFPD Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
Page 192
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 4
contract administrator and City’s and RCFPD’s representative shall be Maritza Martinez, Public
Works Services Director, or such other person as designated in writing by the City and RCFPD
(“City and RCFPD Representative”). It shall be Contractor’s responsibility to assure that the City and
RCFPD Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and
Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City and RCFPD to the City and RCFPD
Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City and RCFPD required
hereunder shall mean the approval of the City and RCFPD Representative.
5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Terry
Noriega, President is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor authorized
to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection
therewith (“Contractor’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge,
capability and reputation of the Contractor’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City
and RCFPD to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Contractor’s Representative shall be
responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting
sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Contractor may not change the
Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City and RCFPD.
6. Contractor’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Contractor or under Contractor’s direct
supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State
and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City and RCFPD business
license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of
all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth
in Section 1.4.
6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s
liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of
this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California
Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or
to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with
such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and RCFPD and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, from any and all liability, damages,
claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor’s violations of personnel
practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City and RCFPD shall have the right to
offset against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City
and RCFPD from Contractor as a result of Contractor’s failure to promptly pay to City and RCFPD
any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.
Page 193
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 5
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings,
photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by
Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary
rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be
“works made for hire” for the benefit of the City and RCFPD. Subject to the provisions of Section
14, upon payment being made, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City and RCFPD
without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City and RCFPD. Basic survey notes,
sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor under this
Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City and RCFPD. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Contractor.
In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its representative, Contractor
shall be responsible for its safe return to City and RCFPD. Under no circumstances shall Contractor
fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City and RCFPD
upon written demand by City and RCFPD for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between
Contractor and City and RCFPD concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This
covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City and RCFPD’s reuse of the Work
Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City and RCFPD’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement
and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City and RCFPD by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor
shall be deemed to grant and assign to City and RCFPD, and shall require all of its subcontractors to
assign to City and RCFPD, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights,
trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the
Project itself, and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work
Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City and RCFPD shall be entitled to utilize the
Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining,
altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Contractor warrants and represents that it has
secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component
as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering
of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this
Agreement, and that City and RCFPD has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work
Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City and RCFPD, and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any
way related to a claim that City and RCFPD’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any
contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall bear
all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents,
materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials
produced under this Agreement. In the event City and RCFPD’s use of any of the Work Product is
held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Contractor, at its expense, shall: (a)
secure for City and RCFPD the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any
Page 194
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 6
injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City and RCFPD; or (b) modify the Work Product
so that it becomes non-infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Contractor is, and shall at all times, remain as to
City and RCFPD, a wholly independent contractor. Contractor shall have no power to incur any debt,
obligation, or liability on behalf of City and RCFPD or otherwise act as an agent of City and RCFPD.
Neither City and RCFPD nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or
any of Contractor’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner
employees of City and RCFPD. Contractor shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contractor
under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City and RCFPD harmless from any and all
taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City and RCFPD by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contractor shall fully comply with the
workers’ compensation law regarding Contractor and Contractor’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Contractor may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and
personnel data of individuals and City and RCFPD employees. Contractor covenants that all data,
documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Contractor or provided for
performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contractor without prior
written authorization by City and RCFPD. City and RCFPD shall grant such authorization if
applicable law requires disclosure. All City and RCFPD data shall be returned to City and RCFPD
upon the termination of this Agreement. Contractor’s covenant under this Section shall survive the
termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is
in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Contractor from giving notices required by law or
complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court,
administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and
reasonably necessary for the Contractor to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any
interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any
manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that, in performance of
this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Contractor
shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the
performance of the Services. Contractor shall not accept any employment or representation during the
term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor “financially interested” (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City and RCFPD on any
matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained.
10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or
entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit or obtain this
Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide
employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other
consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this
warranty, City and RCFPD shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this
Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Contractor hereunder the
Page 195
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 7
full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City and RCFPD
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this
transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of
Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately make a
complete, written disclosure of such interest to City and RCFPD, even if such interest would not be
deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1.
11. Indemnification.
11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City and RCFPD, and their elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and/or RCFPD officials
(collectively, “Indemnitees”), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities,
losses, liens, stop notices, defense costs or expenses (collectively, “Claims”), including but not
limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out
of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its
officers, employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement.
Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims
with counsel of City and RCFPD’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual
attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification
obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this
Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims
arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees.
11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that
they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City and RCFPD, or the deposit
with City and RCFPD, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.
11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives
all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from
all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or
on behalf of the Contractor.
11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the
Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the
law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this
indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive in favor of the
Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and
effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages
to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by
Page 196
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 8
Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City and RCFPD,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall
apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for
bodily injury or disease and Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the
amount required by law.
(4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of
(i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii)
the minimum Insurance coverages and limits shown in this Agreement.
Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage
required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the
City and RCFPD. No representation is made that the minimum
Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the
obligations of the Contractor under this agreement.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and RCFPD and shall not reduce the limits of
coverage. City and RCFPD reserve the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance
policy and endorsements.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to
Page 197
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 9
contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured
endorsement naming the City, RCFPD, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, as additional
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of
Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; and/or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The
coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to City, RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers
or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and/or
RCFPD officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named
insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor’s insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, RCFPD, its
officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving
as independent contractors in the role of City and/or RCFPD officials.
Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, RCFPD, its
officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving
as independent contractors in the role of City and/or RCFPD officials
shall be in excess of Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with
it.
(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits
of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the
required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the
required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self-insured
retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in
coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain
and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Contractor fail to
immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any
canceled policy, the City and RCFPD may procure such insurance at
Contractor’s sole cost and expense.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive the
insurer’s right of subrogation against City and RCFPD, its elected
officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated
volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
City and/or RCFPD officials.
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in
writing by City and RCFPD, which is admitted and licensed to do
business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better
Page 198
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 10
according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or
other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty,
shall not affect the coverage required to be provided.
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or
defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and
attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any
policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements, or
exclusions as required by the City and RCFPD in any request for
proposals applicable to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City and RCFPD with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage
required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s
Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or
endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person
authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be
received and approved by the City and RCFPD before Contractor commences performance. If
performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City and
RCFPD with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of
insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.
12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing
work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including
the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such
subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City
and RCFPD in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City and RCFPD
pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions
in its contract with any sub-subcontractor.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City and RCFPD
relating to Contractor’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall
render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City and RCFPD might require. City and
RCFPD shall compensate Contractor for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed
upon by the parties.
14. Termination. City and RCFPD shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event
City and RCFPD exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City and RCFPD shall pay Contractor
for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided
Contractor is not then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City
Page 199
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 11
and RCFPD by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City and RCFPD
may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after
service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. In such event, complete ownership of all Work
Product and related intellectual property rights shall immediately be deemed vested in, and/or
otherwise assigned to, City and RCFPD as provided in Sections 7.1 and 7.2, whether or not full
payment therefor has been made.
Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City and RCFPD ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City and
RCFPD of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2)
material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the
failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required
because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by
hand or overnight courier service during Contractor’s and City and RCFPD’s regular business hours;
or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the
addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time,
designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City and RCFPD: Maritza Martinez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Public Works Services Department
8794 Lion Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Contractor: Terry Noriega
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.
6332 Santo Diaz Street
Irwindale, CA, 91702
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of
this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant
for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry,
age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Contractor will take
affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are
treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest
in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor’s obligations hereunder without
City’s and RCFPD’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Contractor to
so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null,
void and of no effect.
Page 200
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 12
18. Compliance with Laws; Bonds.
18.1 Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws,
ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the Services.
18.2 California Labor Code Compliance. If the Services consist of maintenance,
repair, or any other work constituting a “public work” as defined in California Labor Code Sections
1720, et seq., and 1771, then Contractor shall comply with the Labor Code requirements set forth in
Exhibit “D” attached hereto.
18.3 Payment and Performance Bonds.
Payment Bond - Required � Not required �
Performance Bond - Required � Not required �
(1) If required in the RFP or other solicitation document, Contractor shall
provide a payment bond and a performance bond in an amount not less
than the total contract amount. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the
Services consist of repair work costing or expected to cost more than
$25,000 during the term hereof, or any renewal term, then, pursuant to
California Civil Code Section 9550, Contractor shall provide a
payment bond in an amount not less than the total cost attributable to
such repair work.
(2) Contractor may be required to increase any required bond amount, or
obtain a new bond, to reflect unanticipated increases in costs of the
Services.
(3) If the Services include maintenance and repair services, the total
contract amount shall be utilized for determining the required bond
amounts.
(4) If one or more bonds are required, the bond forms shall be attached to
this Agreement.
(5) Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety
insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall
be accepted. The surety must be a California-admitted surety with a
current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII and satisfactory to the
City and RCFPD. If a California-admitted surety insurer issuing
bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered
qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California
Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City and
RCFPD.
Page 201
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 13
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one
or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any
other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City and
RCFPD of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City and RCFPD
of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and
the making of any such payment by City and RCFPD shall in no way impair or prejudice any
right or remedy available to City and RCFPD with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement,
the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit,
including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced in this Agreement,
including attachments and exhibits, are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of
any material discrepancy conflict between the express provisions of this Agreement and the
provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance
of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California.
Venue for any legal action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County
Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not
be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who
causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted
that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of
which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated
agreement between Contractor, and City and RCFPD. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral
or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended,
nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which
expressly refers to this Agreement.
25. Time Is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in every provision of this
Agreement.
Page 202
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives,
have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Contractor Name:
_________________________
[use this signature block if the contractor is a corporation]
__________________________________ ______________________________
□ Chairperson □ President □ Vice President □ Secretary □ Asst. Secretary
□ Chief Finance Officer □ Asst. Treasurer
[Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 313, both signature lines must be executed
unless the signatory holds at least one of the offices designated on each line.]
[use this signature block if the contractor is a limited liability company]
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Manager Manager
[Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 17703.01(d), both signature lines must be
executed unless the articles of incorporation state that the firm is managed by only one manager.]
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Name Date
Title
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
By:
Name Date
Title
Page 203
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised:8/15/24
Page 15
ATTACHMENTS
• Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations
• Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations
• Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
Page 204
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 16
Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations
Page 205
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 17
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations
Page 206
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 18
Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
Page 207
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 19
SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of Work Contents:
• Exhibit A – RFP 25/26-006
• Exhibit B – Contractor’s proposal, dated June 5, 2025
• Exhibit C – Unit Costs
• Exhibit D – California Labor Code Compliance
Page 208
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”) #25/26-006
FOR
PARK MOWING AND FACILITY LANDSCAPE MANTENANCE
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Page 209
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 59
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 6
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 6
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................. 6
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 7
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 7
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 7
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 8
1.7. BRAND NAMES ......................................................................................................................................... 8
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 8
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 8
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 9
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 10
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE .................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES ................................................................................................................................. 10
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES .................................................................................................................................... 10
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT................................................................................................................................ 11
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 12
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 12
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH ................................................................................................. 12
3.4. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .............................................................................................................. 12
3.5. PROJECT TEAM ........................................................................................................................................ 13
3.6. STAFFING LEVELS ..................................................................................................................................... 13
3.7. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 14
3.8. PROPOSAL RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................... 14
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.10. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 14
3.11. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 14
3.12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 15
Page 210
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 59
3.13. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 15
3.14. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 15
3.15. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 15
3.16. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 16
3.17. COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 16
3.18. LINE-ITEM PRICING .................................................................................................................................. 16
3.19. TARIFF IMPACT VERIFICATION BEFORE ADJUSTMENTS .................................................................................... 16
3.20. INDEXED PRICING WITH MARKET BENCHMARKING ........................................................................................ 16
3.21. TARIff REFUND AND PRICE REDUCTION CLAUSE ............................................................................................ 17
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................... 17
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 17
4.2. EXAMINATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATION, AND SITE OF WORK ........................................................................ 17
4.3. CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE ............................................................................................................................ 18
4.4. COMPETENCY OF VENDOR ......................................................................................................................... 18
4.5. CONTRACT TERM ..................................................................................................................................... 18
4.6. BONDS ................................................................................................................................................... 18
4.7. SUPERVISION AND STAFF ........................................................................................................................... 18
4.8. PREVAILING WAGE .................................................................................................................................. 18
4.9. COMMUNICATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 19
4.10. NON-RESPONSIVENESS OF CONTRACTOR ..................................................................................................... 19
4.11. SERVICE LEVELS ....................................................................................................................................... 19
4.12. SCHEDULING OF WORK ............................................................................................................................. 20
4.13. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ................................................................................................................. 20
4.14. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT .................................................................................................................. 20
4.15. DEDUCTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 22
4.16. DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE – NOTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION .............................................................. 24
4.17. WORK SITES: BASE BID ............................................................................................................................ 25
4.18. ADDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 26
4.19. QUALITY OF WORK .................................................................................................................................. 26
4.20. INSPECTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 26
Page 211
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 59
4.21. REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & CITY PROPERTY.......................................................................... 26
4.22. UTILITY BILLS .......................................................................................................................................... 27
4.23. CONFORMING TO STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION .......................... 27
4.24. PERMITS ................................................................................................................................................ 27
4.25. WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL ................................................................................................................. 27
4.25.1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PERMIT ...................................................................................................................... 27
4.25.2. SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND DELINEATORS .................................................................................................... 27
4.25.3. TRAINING ............................................................................................................................................. 27
4.26. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE........................................................................................................................... 28
4.26.1. TURF MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................................. 28
4.26.2. SHRUB, GROUNDCOVER, DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) AND VINE MAINTENANCE ............................................ 30
4.26.2.1. SHRUB MAINTENANCE........................................................................................................................ 31
4.26.2.2. GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................... 32
4.26.2.3. DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) .............................................................................................................. 33
4.26.2.4. VINE MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................................... 34
4.26.2.5. TREE MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................................... 35
4.26.3. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................................................... 37
4.26.3.1. GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................... 37
4.26.3.2. SHRUB BEDS & PLANTER AREAS........................................................................................................... 38
4.26.3.3. TURF AREAS ..................................................................................................................................... 38
4.26.3.4. NEW PLANT MATERIALS ..................................................................................................................... 39
4.26.3.5. REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT ................................................................................................................ 39
4.26.4. PEST CONTROL ...................................................................................................................................... 39
4.26.5. TRAIL MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................................. 41
4.26.6. HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................................... 42
4.26.7. MULCHSCAPE MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................................. 42
4.26.8. SPORTS FIELD MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................................. 43
4.26.9. PLAYGROUND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................................. 43
4.26.10. PICNIC AREA MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 43
4.26.11. HARD COURT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................. 44
Page 212
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 59
4.26.12. RESTROOM MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................. 44
4.26.13. PIPE CHASE MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................. 45
4.26.14. DRINKING FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 45
4.26.15. TRASH RECEPTACLE MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 45
4.26.16. TRASH ENCLOSURE MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 46
4.26.17. GRAFFITI REMOVAL (All Service Levels) ............................................................................................. 46
4.26.18. DRAINS (All Service Levels) ............................................................................................................. 46
4.26.19. STORM DEBRIS CLEANUP .................................................................................................................... 46
4.26.20. DEBRIS AND TRASH REMOVAL ............................................................................................................. 47
4.26.21. CLEAN-UP (All Service Levels) ......................................................................................................... 47
4.27. EXTRA WORK .......................................................................................................................................... 47
5. EVALUATION AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION PROCESS ........................................................................................ 48
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 48
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 48
5.3. COST EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................... 49
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS .................................................................................................................................. 49
5.5. PRESENTATIONS / ORAL BOARD INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................... 49
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................... 49
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER ............................................................................................................................. 50
5.8. CONTRACTOR SELECTION .......................................................................................................................... 50
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 50
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” ........ 51
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” ............................................. 52
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” .................................................................................... 53
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ....................................................................................... 54
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” ............................................................ 55
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ......................................................................................................... 56
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ................................................................................................... 57
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET ...................................................................................................... 58
Page 213
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 59
1. OVERVIEW
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Contractors (hereinafter “Contractor”)
to submit a proposal response for Request for Proposals (“RFP”) #25/26-006 for Park Mowing and Facility
Landscape Maintenance in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services and Specifications indicated herein.
Contractors wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Contractor on Planet Bids
through the City website at http://www.cityofrc.us/ https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement.
Only those responses received from registered Contractors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by
the named Contractor that has downloaded the RFP. Submitting a response under a Contractor name that does
not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response
from further consideration.
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete RFP responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified
in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be
responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post RFP May 1, 2025
Questions Due May 20, 2025, 9:00 am
Addendum Issued May 22, 2025
RFP Response Due Date June 5, 2025, 9:00 am
Evaluation Process June 10, 2025 - June 24, 2025
Short List Letter Issued TBD
Oral Board & Presentation TBD
Letter of Intent to Award TBD
Contract Award Date TBD
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to
Contractor.)
Page 214
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 59
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Contractors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of
any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears
no responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this RFP shall be considered a part of this
RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP.
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This RFP should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Proposal in
accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP
responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the
RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify
your RFP response submittal. Contractors must submit signed RFP responses by the due date and time as
specified herein. Contractors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted
as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this RFP and
any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the
requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City
has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement
signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the
due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in
the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the
above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this RFP until a Contractor is awarded, Contractors are not permitted to communicate
with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or
site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
Page 215
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 59
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
All materials submitted in response to this RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be
returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Contractor submitting the RFP response. A copy of
the RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Contractor
considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public
Records Act may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or
otherwise.
1.7. BRAND NAMES
Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not
restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFP responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality
specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFP response clearly describes the article
offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Contractor specifies otherwise, it is understood
that the Contractor is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right
to determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the
brand name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample.
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to
ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all
requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or
instructions will be at the Contractor’s sole risk.
Contractors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and
in this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide
notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Contractors by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however,
it is the Contractor’s responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the
RFP due date.
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the
City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
• Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure.
• Reject any or all RFPs.
• Reissue a Request for RFPs.
Page 216
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 59
• Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including
deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment,
or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs.
• The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service,
and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response.
• The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with
any or all responsive and responsible Contractors who submit RFP responses.
• Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means.
• Determine that no project will be pursued.
• The City reserves the right to inspect the Contractor’s place of business prior to award or at any time
during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Contractor’s capabilities and
qualifications.
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, Public records
are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right
to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall
be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted
by law.
Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this
RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or
omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty
to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public
Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary, or exempt, and state the legal basis
for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information
is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for
the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public
disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal
basis to do so.
Page 217
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 59
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Contractor awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no
later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected
Contractor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of
duties required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request
throughout the term of the Contract.
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES
Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the
provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected
Contractor(s) shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an
exemption from the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code
§ 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC § 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this RFP that such an
exemption will apply or that prevailing wages will not be required for a scope of work covered by this RFP.
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Contractor require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in
this RFP, the awarded Contractor will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its
right, title, or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Contractor to so
assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no
effect.
The awarded Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel
engaged in performing the Services including Contractor’s subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the
awarded Contractor or under the awarded Contractor’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the
qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and
benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation,
unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is
aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured
against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of
that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
Page 218
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 59
In case of default by the Contractor, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be
limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and
may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Contractor, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid
by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding
of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or
Contractors for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Contractor.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall
be__________________, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall
be the Contractor’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the
performance of the services, and the Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City-to-City
Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the
approval of the City Representative.
Contractor Representative:
The response to this RFP shall designate the representative of the Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with
respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Contractor’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the
Contractor’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the
Contractor. Therefore, the Contractor’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement
for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services
hereunder. The successful Contractor may not change the Contractor’s Representative without the prior
written approval of City ’s Representative.
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Contractor personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being
conducted. While on City property, the Contractor’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under
no circumstances shall the Contractor’s or Contractor’s sub-Contractor personnel be deemed as employees of
the City. Contractor or Contractor’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees
of the City.
Contractor's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when
interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Contractor's personnel shall be required
to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Contractors, and the public.
Nothing contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Contractor the sole right to supply personal or
Page 219
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 59
contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase
Order.
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this RFP form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and
evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely Contractors must comply with the format and submission
requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation
process.
If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with
an RFP review and negotiations.
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
RFP responses must include a cover letter including the Contractors business name and address of Contractor
and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. The
cover letter shall condense and highlight the contents of the Contractor’s RFP response to provide the Evaluation
Committee with a broad understanding of the Contractor’s approach, proposal, experience, and staffing. A
signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be
considered confirmation of the Contractor’s ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This
section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by
sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the RFP response will be separated
by a title page at the beginning of each section.
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
Outline the Contractor’s understanding of the project and any potential challenges or delays you foresee and
ways to overcome these challenges. Describe the Contractor’s proposed approach to the scope of services listed
in this RFP. Include a full, detailed task breakdown that outlines assumptions and deliverables clearly for each
task. Contractors may include options or enhancements to the scope of work for the City’s consideration.
3.4. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
To be considered for this project, the Contractor must have a minimum of five (5) years of experience
developing, fully implementing, and/or performing similar Scope of Work. The Contractor shall demonstrate
Page 220
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13 of 59
their qualifications, experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide an
overview of the Contractor’s qualifications and experience, including.
• The number of years in business, main business focus, locations that will primarily support the project.
• If the Company is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed
solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services.
• A statement as to whether your Company is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or
private nonprofit Company, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
• Five projects with a similar scope of work completed within the last five years. Must include the project
scope of work, Contractor’s team members that worked on the project, and timeline of the project
delivery.
• The Contractor shall provide additional information as necessary for the City to consider in the
evaluation of the submitted proposal.
RFP responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be
submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFP responses will be accepted. RFP responses must include
the information required by this RFP. There is no maximum page limit for this RFP.
3.5. PROJECT TEAM
This section should introduce the key staff that the Company commits to the project. A proposed Organization
Chart shall be included. Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the City.
Resumes shall include the following information:
• Project Role,
• Length of time with the Company,
• Years of Experience,
• Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described
herein,
• Educational background,
• Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein,
• Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
3.6. STAFFING LEVELS
The Contractor shall complete and submit Schedule IV, Labor Hours by Month and Job Classification. The
completed Schedule IV shall list the minimum labor hours by Month and Job Classification the Contractor will
provide, if a contract is awarded, to complete the routine services at the frequencies specified herein. Provision
of the minimum number labor hours shall not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to complete the
regularly scheduled maintenance tasks at the frequencies specified in these specifications.
Page 221
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14 of 59
“Extra work” projects shall require the assignment of additional staff. Staff assigned to “extra work” projects
shall not be counted toward the minimum labor hours proposed for the routine, cyclical, services.
Failure to submit Schedule IV will be cause to deem the Contractor’s proposal to be non-responsive.
3.7. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Contractor intends to subcontract any portion of the work, a detailed list of any subcontractors, partners,
or third-party Contractors who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services should be
included in this section. Information provided on subcontractors Contractors shall include:
• Description of subcontractor’s role in the project.
• Description of the Contractor’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors,
• Resumes with the same format as specified above for the key team members of the subcontracting
team,
• Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and
telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this RFP.
3.8. PROPOSAL RESPONSE
Under this section Contractors shall provide a full, detailed response to the City ’s Scope of Services listed herein.
Contractors should be as thorough as possible in their response as it may be the only opportunity to convey
information regarding your business, ability, and qualifications to complete the services needed.
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet
Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G and Exhibit H. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem your RFP submittal as non-responsive.
3.10. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed
“Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.11. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Contractor will be required to
enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City
’s bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Contractor and
Page 222
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15 of 59
signed by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general
provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Contractor will be
deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services
Agreement Exceptions Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the
PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in
a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception
Summary must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G”.
3.12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Contractors must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability
to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of
Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The
awarded Contractor will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the
Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded
Contractor, will not be accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.13. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Contractor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Contractor’s
responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been
posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become
part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. Contractors must indicate their acknowledgement
of any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted
under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.14. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Bidding Contractors must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Contractor Certification Form” that they are
not listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with
the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and
12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Contractor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are
tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid
Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.15. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Contractors shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet
Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. This will indicate a Contractors agreement to or not to allow other entities
to utilize the RFP response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
Page 223
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16 of 59
3.16. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Unsigned RFP responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Contractor has
carefully examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and
hereby proposes and agrees, if the Contractors RFP response is accepted, Contractor agrees to furnish all
material in accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit
cost amounts set forth in the Contractors RFP response.
3.17. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are
being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years.
“Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the
“Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your RFP
response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit
H” in Planet Bids.
3.18. LINE-ITEM PRICING
Line-item pricing for this RFP must be provided directly in the Planet Bids system under the “Line Items” tab.
This pricing is not an estimate and is Company fixed price for each item listed. Contractor’s pricing quotes
outside of the pricing listed in Planet Bids under the “Line Items” tab will not be accepted or considered for
award. Any additional cost required should be noted in the additional cost line item and a summary of the cost
provided in the notes section of the line item. While line-item pricing accompanies your RFP response it is not
to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. The City
will not be obligated to any estimated pricing or pricing not identified in the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids.
Failure to provide the required line-Item pricing in the required format will cause Contractors RFP response to
be considered as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Any questions
or clarifications regarding how to correctly submit line-Item pricing should be submitted by the “Questions Due”
date and time indicated in the schedule of events.
3.19. TARIFF IMPACT VERIFICATION BEFORE ADJUSTMENTS
Contractors requesting price increases due to tariff changes must provide detailed cost breakdowns, including
the original tariff rates and the new imposed rates, supplier invoices, and other supporting documentation. The
agency reserves the right to audit supplier records to verify tariff-related costs. Any unverified or excessive
increases shall not be accepted.
3.20. INDEXED PRICING WITH MARKET BENCHMARKING
Page 224
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17 of 59
The agency may request a review of contract pricing at any time during the contract term to determine if the
pricing remains consistent with current market conditions. If tariff rates decrease or if market conditions
indicate a reduction in the total cost of materials, the agency reserves the right to request a price adjustment.
3.21. TARIff REFUND AND PRICE REDUCTION CLAUSE
Should tariffs be reduced or removed during the contract term, the contractor shall pass the cost savings on to
the agency through an equivalent price reduction. The contractor must notify the agency within 30 days of any
tariff reduction and submit revised pricing accordingly."
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The scope of work is complete, continuous, consistent, and safe landscape and irrigation maintenance of the
designated areas that are specified herein. During, and at the end of the contract period, all plant material shall
be in a healthy, growing condition and all irrigation systems will be in the proper state of repair and adjustment.
The contractor shall provide all equipment, labor, and materials necessary for performing landscape and
irrigation maintenance according to the specifications herein.
The intent and purpose of this agreement is to provide a level of maintenance to the areas such that each will
present a safe, pleasing, and desirable appearance within the limitations of the contracted service levels. The
contractor agrees to maintain all the designated areas covered by this Agreement at such levels. The Public
Works Services Director, or their designated representative, shall be the sole judge as to the adequacy and
quality of maintenance.
The work shall be done in accordance with City Standard Plans and “The ‘Green Book’ Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction” 2021 edition including subsequent amendments, supplements and/or additions.
Copies are available from the publisher, Building News, Incorporated, 1612 So. Clementine Street, Anaheim,
California, 92802, telephone (714) 517-0970.
Where the Public Works Services Director is mentioned in these Special Provisions, it shall be noted that their
designated representative may act in their behalf regarding administration of this agreement.
4.2. EXAMINATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATION, AND SITE OF WORK
Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the work site, plans, specifications, and other
contract documents, and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions,
requirements and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No bidder shall at any time after
submission of a proposal make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of
information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the satisfactory completion of the job. Any
Page 225
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18 of 59
errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the specifications, or other contract documents shall be called to
the attention of the City and clarified prior to the submission of proposals.
4.3. CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor’s licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to,
a Class A (General Engineering Contractor) or a Class C-27 (Landscape Contractor); in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and
rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded.
4.4. COMPETENCY OF VENDOR
The bidder shall be licensed under the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 9 of the Business and Professions Code
of the State of California to do the type of work contemplated in the contract and shall be skilled and regularly
engaged in the general class or type of work called for under this contract.
4.5. CONTRACT TERM
The Contract Term shall be from the date of mutual execution and shall remain in full force through June 30,
2026. Parties to any contract resulting from this RFP shall have the option to renew the Contract Term in one
(1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years.
4.6. BONDS
If a contract is awarded, the Contractor shall furnish a Labor and Materials Bond in a sum equal to 100% of the
contract price, as required by the provisions of Section 9554 of the California Civil Code.
4.7. SUPERVISION AND STAFF
The contractor shall assign an account manager to be on site each working day, working regular working hours,
for the duration of this contract. Regular working hours for the purposes of this section regarding the account
manager shall be Monday through Friday for eight hours per day dedicated to this contract. The contractor and
his staff shall have skills, expertise, and experience in arboriculture, turf management, pest control, soils,
fertilizers, plant identification and irrigation systems maintenance. The account manager must be fluent in the
English language. The account manager shall be thoroughly knowledgeable of the provisions of this contract.
4.8. PREVAILING WAGE
Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter
1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department
Page 226
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19 of 59
of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates
of per diem wages.
This contract is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
For all new contracts awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors shall furnish
electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner.
Each Contractor or Subcontractor shall preserve his weekly payroll records for a period of three (3) years. The
payroll records shall set out accurately and completely the name, address, social security number, occupational
classification, and hourly wage rate of each employee, hours worked by him during the payroll period, and full
weekly wages earned by him, any deductions made from such weekly wages, and the actual weekly wages paid
to him.
Such payroll records shall be made available for inspection by the City or its authorized representatives.
In addition to the foregoing payroll reporting and retention requirements, the Contractor and each of his
subcontractors shall prepare payrolls on forms prescribed and in accordance with instructions furnished by the
City. The Contractor shall deliver to the City a certified and legible copy of each payroll with the routine monthly
invoices.
Payment will not be made prior to the submission to the City of certified payrolls prepared in accordance with
Labor Code section 1776.
4.9. COMMUNICATIONS
The Contractor shall provide a cellular telephone to each account manager. Each account manager shall always
carry the telephone on their person during the workday for communication with the City representative. Each
account manager shall be on call 24 hours per day, seven days per week, for emergencies within the contract
areas.
4.10. NON-RESPONSIVENESS OF CONTRACTOR
Failure of the Contractor or the account managers to respond immediately (within 1 hour) to the telephone
notification by the Public Works Services Director of an emergency condition, or failure of the Contractor to
respond within two days of written notification by the Public Works Services Director or their representative,
shall give the Public Works Services Director the right to cause necessary work to be performed by City crews,
or other contractors and any costs incurred in so doing shall be deducted from the payment for the month in
which the work was performed.
4.11. SERVICE LEVELS
Page 227
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20 of 59
Now, or in the future, the City may have severe budget constraints within one or more of the funding sources
to which this Contract applies. As a result, and at any time, the City may choose to contract for maintenance of
the affected sites at less than the originally contracted service level for any, or all landscape services as described
herein. Adjustments to the service level may apply to all sites covered by the contract, or a subset thereof, as
needed to meet budgetary constraints. The City will notify the Contractor in writing fifteen (15) calendar days
prior to service level adjustments.
4.12. SCHEDULING OF WORK
The Contractor shall accomplish all normal landscape maintenance required under this contract between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Exceptions may be made to normal working hours,
where incidence of use may be too great during the hours specified to allow for proper maintenance. The Public
Works Services Director or their representative may grant, on an individual basis, permission to perform
contract maintenance at other hours including weekends. No maintenance functions that generate excessive
noise that would cause annoyance to residents of the area shall commence before 8:00 a.m. Monday through
Saturday and 9:00 am on Sundays. Unless otherwise specified by the Public Works Services Director, the
Contractor shall supply the City with a bi-weekly schedule of routine work (the Maintenance Schedule Chart) to
be followed in the performance of any work required by these specifications. Said schedule shall be submitted
by the contractor five working days prior to the start date listed on the schedule. Any changes in scheduling
shall be immediately reported, in writing, to the Public Works Services Director.
The Public Works Services Director will be notified in writing at least 24 hours in advance of each start date of
non-routine maintenance operations including, but not limited to, fertilization, chemical application and tree
pruning.
4.13. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Assembly Bill 73. The law states that, "every person
planning to conduct any excavation is required to contract a regional notification center at least 2 working days
prior to excavation." Assembly Bill 73 defines excavation as, "any operation in which earth, rock, or other
material in the ground is moved, removed, or otherwise displaced by means of tools, equipment, or explosives
in any of the following ways: grading, trenching, digging, ditching, drilling, auguring, tunneling, scraping, cable
or pipe lowing and driving, or any other way." The Contractor shall assume all liability incurred from any type
of excavation performed at the worksite.
4.14. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
a) The Contractor will be paid monthly based upon the unit cost and lump sum amounts listed in the cost
proposal.
b) The unit and lump sum prices to be paid shall be full compensation for the items of work and all
appurtenant work, including furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals.
Page 228
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 59
c) Unless specifically excluded herein, payment for all items of work, including, but not limited to, the work
listed in section 4.26, Routine Maintenance, shall be included in the proposed price for the following line
items dependent on the contracted service level for each site:
a. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Pest Control
b. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Trees
c. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Groundcover
d. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Turf
e. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Irrigation
f. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Hardscape
g. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Trash Receptacles
h. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level A for Restroom Buildings
i. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Pest Control
j. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Trees
k. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Groundcover
l. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Turf
m. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Irrigation
n. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Hardscape
o. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Trash Receptacles
p. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level B for Restroom Buildings
q. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Pest Control
r. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Trees
s. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Groundcover
t. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Turf
u. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Irrigation
v. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Hardscape
w. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Trash Receptacles
x. Continuous Park Maintenance at Service Level C for Restroom Buildings
d) The Estimated Annual Quantity given in the proposal is approximate, being given as a basis for the
comparison of bids only, and the City does not, expressly or by implication, agree that the actual amount
of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class
or portion of the work, or to omit any portion of the work, as may be deemed advisable or necessary by
the Public Works Services Director.
e) Whenever the Contractor is required to perform work or furnish equipment, labor, tools, and materials
of any class for which no price is fixed in the Proposal, it shall be understood that such work, equipment,
labor, tools, and material shall be provided without extra charge, allowance, or direct payment of any
kind. The cost of performing such work or furnishing such equipment, labor, tools, and materials shall
be included in the unit bid prices in the proposal and no additional compensation will be made,
Page 229
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 59
therefore.
f) On or about the first day of each month, the Contractor shall present an invoice for the previous month
for the contracted monthly amount. The invoice shall include the account number for each and the
purchase order number for this contract.
g) Included with the monthly and/or material invoices will be notations of the routine work functions
accomplished during that period that occur on frequencies greater than one month, e.g. quarterly or
semi-annually, such as fertilization in accordance with Schedule I, chemical application. The quantity
invoiced and paid shall be the total square feet shown in the Bid except that the Public Works Services
Director shall have the right to increase or decrease the total quantity based upon documented field
measurements.
h) The Public Works Services Director will make payment monthly after verification of completion. Sites
which, in the opinion of the Public Works Services Director, have not been maintained in accordance
with the Contract Special Provisions will be deducted from the monthly payment in accordance with
section 4.15, Deductions.
i) Extra work shall be separately invoiced in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices provided in
the supplementary "Extra Work Schedule" of the contract bid.
j) Draft extra work reports per Maintenance District should be delivered to the Public Works Services
Director prior to invoice preparation. The purpose of which is to expedite the invoicing and payment
process, and to approve the work for completion and payment.
4.15. DEDUCTIONS
Deductions from monthly payments shall be divided into three categories: Performance on Schedule, Deficient
Performance and Non-Performance.
Payment deductions shall not be construed a penalty but as adjustment of payment to the Contractor for only
the work performed, or as the cost to the City for inspection and other related costs from failure of the
Contractor to complete the work according to schedule.
a) Performance on schedule
Failure of the Contractor to timely perform will result in additional inspection and administrative costs
being incurred by the City.
The sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per site may be deducted from payments to the Contractor
for each calendar day where an item of work is not completed in accordance with the bi-weekly schedule
submitted pursuant to Section 4.12. This deduction applies individually to each scheduled task or subtask
listed herein that is not completed in accordance with the bi-weekly schedule.
The maximum deduction per month for “Performance on Schedule” shall be equal to fifty percent (50%)
Page 230
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 59
of the total monthly contract price for routine maintenance.
Deductions for “Performance on Schedule” are, at the City’s option, in addition to or in lieu of other
remedies provided herein.
b) Deficient Performance
Level of Maintenance: In the judgment of the City, if the level of maintenance is less than that specified
herein, the City shall, at its option, in addition to or in lieu of other remedies provided herein, withhold
appropriate payment from the Contractor until services are rendered in accordance with specifications
set forth within this document.
The contractor is required to correct deficiencies within the time specified by the City. If noted deficient
work has not been completed, payment for subject deficiency shall be deducted during the current
billing period and shall continue to be deducted in subsequent billing periods until deficiency is
corrected, without right to retroactive payments. The amount to be withheld per deficient site shall be
the amount paid for the entire site.
Minimum Manpower: Failure of the Contractor to comply with minimum required manpower, as listed
in Schedule IV, Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 submitted with the proposal, shall result in a deficiency deduction.
The deduction shall be calculated by the following formula:
(Labor Hours Proposed - Labor Hours Provided) ÷ Labor Hours Provided × Monthly Rate = Deduction
Example:
Labor Hours Proposed: 100
Labor Hours Provided: 80
Monthly Rate: $1,000
(100-80) ÷ 100 × $1,000 = $200 Deduction
Other deficiencies: Examples include, but are not limited to, failure to comply with conditions,
specifications, reports, schedules and/or directives from the Public Works Services Director. Any such
deficiency will result in a deficiency deduction of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per instance per
working day.
The maximum cumulative deduction per month for “Deficient Performance” shall be equal to the sum
of the monthly fees for all locations.
Deductions for “Deficient Performance” are, at the City’s option, in addition to or in lieu of other
remedies provided herein.
c) Non-Performance
Schedules: Failure to provide bi-weekly schedules in compliance with the contract specifications may
result in a deficiency deduction of fifty Dollars ($50) per calendar day.
Page 231
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 59
Reports: Failure to provide reports in compliance with the contract specifications may result in a
deficiency deduction of fifty Dollars ($50) per calendar day.
Notifications: Failure to provide notifications to in compliance with the Contract Specifications may
result in a deficiency deduction of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per instance.
4.16. DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE – NOTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
a) The Contractor shall be notified both verbally and in writing, each time its performance is unsatisfactory
and corrective action is necessary.
b) Upon notification of deficient performance, the Contractor will be immediately subject to the deductions
listed in Section 4.15. Deductions.
c) The Contractor shall complete corrective action within the following time frames following notification:
a. Weekly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Weekly Duties shall be corrected during the first working day
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed during the first working day following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
b. Bi-Weekly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Bi-Weekly Duties shall be corrected within two working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within two working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
c. Monthly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Monthly Duties shall be corrected within four working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within four working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
d. Bi-Monthly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Bi-Monthly Duties shall be corrected within eight working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within eight working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
e. Quarterly, Semi-Annual, and Annual Duties
i. Deficient performance of Quarterly, Semi-Annual, and Annual Duties shall be corrected
Page 232
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 59
within ten working days following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within ten working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
4.17. WORK SITES: BASE BID
Archibald Library: 7368 Archibald Avenue
Bark at Central Park: 11200 Baseline Road
Foothill Trailhead: 8476 Foothill Boulevard
Lions Park: 9161 Baseline Road
RC Family Resource Center: 9791 Arrow Route
Metrolink: 11208 Azusa Court
Ellena Park (Mow Only): 7139 Kenyon Way
Victoria Arbors Park (Mow Only): 7429 Arbor Lane
Victoria Groves Park (Mow Only): 6840 Fairmont Way
Vintage Park (Mow Only): 11745 Victoria Park Lane
Windrows Park (Mow Only): 6849 Victoria Park Lane
Coyote Canyon Park (Mow Only): 10987 Terra Vista Parkway
Milliken Park (Mow Only): 7699 Milliken Avenue
Mountain View Park (Mow Only): 11701 Terra Vista Parkway
Ralph M Lewis Park (Mow Only): 7898 Elm Street
Spruce Park (Mow Only): 7730 Spruce Avenue
West Greenway Park (Mow Only): 7756 Meadowcrest Court
Etiwanda Creek Park (Mow Only): 5939 East Avenue
Garcia Park (Mow Only): 13150 Garcia Drive
Day Creek Park (Mow Only): 12350 Banyan Street
Legacy Park (Mow Only): 5858 Santa Ynez Place
Olive Grove Park (Mow Only): 13931 Youngs Canyon Road
Rancho Summit Park (Mow Only): 5958 Soledad Way
Fire Station 171: 6627 Amethyst Avenue
Fire Station 172: 8812 San Bernardino Road
Fire Station 173: 12270 Firehouse Court
Fire Station 174: 11297 Jersey Boulevard
Fire Station 175: 11108 Banyan Street
Fire Station 176: 11208 Azusa Court
Fire Station 177: 9270 Rancho Street
Fire Station 178: 10595 Town Center Drive
Work Sites: Additive Bid
Central Park (Weed Abatement): 11200 Baseline Road
Page 233
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26 of 59
Victoria Gardens Cultural Center: 12505 Cultural Center Drive
Reference is also made to the maps included in Appendix B.
4.18. ADDITIONS
During the term of the contract, landscapes may be added to or deleted from this contract. In addition, sites
may be modified, or the landscape area audited, and the inventory adjusted accordingly. The Contractor will be
given no less than fifteen (15) calendar days’ notice prior to any changes to the inventory and pay quantities.
Further, the Contractor may have the option of accompanying the City inspector on final inspection, prior to
acceptance of the site, to comment about the condition of the site. Payment shall be adjusted based on the
unit costs listed in the proposal.
4.19. QUALITY OF WORK
All work shall be performed in accordance with the service level for which the work is contracted, and the best
irrigation and landscape maintenance practices shall be implemented to provide aesthetically pleasing, healthy
and safe parkways, paseos and medians. The Public Works Services Director or his representative shall be the
sole judge as to the adequacy and quality of maintenance.
All materials, equipment and supplies used to repair and maintain devises and materials pursuant to the
specifications for PARK MOWING AND FACILITY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE shall meet current City standards
for the individual landscape sites.
4.20. INSPECTIONS
Scheduled on a specific day of the week and on a semi-monthly basis during the middle of the month, the
Contractor or their representative will walk and/or drive the project with the Public Works Services Director or
their representative for the purpose of determining compliance with the specifications or to discuss required
work. Any specific problem area which does not meet the conditions of the specifications set forth herein shall
be called to the attention of the Contractor and, if not corrected within the timeframes listed in section 4.16(c),
shall be deducted in accordance with Section 4-15, Deductions.
4.21. REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & CITY PROPERTY
The Contractor shall be responsible for replacement of dead plants, City property, and any other items deemed
necessary due to contractor negligence. This includes (but is not limited to) trees, shrubs, and turf damaged by
untrained or negligent equipment operators, fencing damaged by mower operator negligence, or the failure of
the contractor to provide water to plant material. This includes sites where the irrigation cannot be repaired
in a reasonable amount of time even in circumstances beyond the contractor’s control. If the irrigation cannot
be repaired in a reasonable amount of time and it is out the contractor’s control, then the contractor shall use
alternative irrigation methods including but not limited to a water tender, station masters, renting hydrant
meters, etc. This type of temporary alternative irrigation shall be approved and paid as an extra by the City.
Page 234
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 27 of 59
4.22. UTILITY BILLS
The City shall bear all the costs for water and electricity used on the sites covered by this contract as billed on
the regular monthly invoices received by the City from the utility agencies.
4.23. CONFORMING TO STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
State and Federal guidelines for storm water pollution prevention are known as Best Management Practices
(BMP’s). These practices will help reduce groundwater contamination and pollution to our wetlands, beaches,
and coastlines. Since Landscaping can and does contribute to storm water pollution, BMP guidelines taken from
the California Storm Water Quality Association’s Handbook are provided for the Contractor’s reference. In
addition, these BMPs shall be reviewed with any new employee before he begins work in the field, and with all
crews on at least an annual basis. (See Appendix C)
4.24. PERMITS
Prior to the start of any work, the Contractor shall obtain the applicable City permits and plan for City
inspections. The City will issue the permits at no charge to the Contractor. The Contractor and all subcontractors
shall each obtain a City business license and shall be licensed in accordance with State Business and Professions
Code. The Contractor shall also obtain any and all other permits, licenses, inspections, certificates, or
authorizations required by any governing body or entity.
4.25. WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
4.25.1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PERMIT
The Contractor shall prepare a permit application for street CLOSURE AND SHALL ATTACH TWO COPIES OF THE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL signing, barricading and/or detour routing. The permit application and
accompanying attachments shall be reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. Upon the Traffic Engineer's approval,
a no-fee Street Closure Permit shall be issued. No Street Closure, Lane Closure, Detour or other work requiring
traffic control shall commence prior to issuance of said permit.
4.25.2. SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND DELINEATORS
The Contractor shall provide and install barricades, delineators, warning devices and construction signs in
accordance with the current California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual (CJUTCM) published by the California
Inter- Utility Coordinating Committee, the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH) and the current
Caltrans Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones unless otherwise approved
by the Engineer. During adverse weather or unusual traffic or working conditions additional traffic devices shall
be placed as directed by the Engineer.
4.25.3. TRAINING
Page 235
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28 of 59
Upon award of the contract and before work can begin within the public right-of-way, the contractor shall
provide written proof of work zone safety training of all supervisory staff. The contractor will be responsible for
all work zone safety inspections and regular training of all staff setting up any traffic control.
4.26. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
See section 4-14 for information on payment for routine maintenance tasks not listed on the cost proposal
sheet.
4.26.1. TURF MAINTENANCE
a) Mowing
The Contractor shall use mulching-type mowers that are approved prior to use by the Public Works Services
Director. An example of the completed work done by each mulching mower must be presented for approval
to the Public Works Services Director. Regardless of the season, the mowing height of tall fescue shall be 2 ½
to 3” unless directed otherwise by the Public Works Services Director. All equipment shall be well maintained,
adjusted properly, and blades shall always be kept sharp.
All turf and adjacent hardscape areas are required to present a neat, clean, and relatively debris free
appearance upon the completion of the mowing project for the day. Since this contract requires the use of
mulching type mowers, this may require that accumulated debris including leaves, trash, tree bark, branches,
twigs, etc. be removed from the turf and surrounding hardscape areas prior to mowing.
Mowing dates shall be set on the Maintenance Schedule Chart to provide the required number of mowings
per year. Work shall be performed on the same day each week. Mowing days will be coordinated with the
City so that, if possible, mowing occurs 1 day prior to street sweeping. Street sweeper schedules will be
provided to the contractor by the City Representative upon request. All mowing missed due to inclement
weather shall be rescheduled within 3 working days on the weekly schedule and within 7 days on the biweekly
schedule. If weather or ground conditions persist, the Public Works Services Director may change the annual
schedule to allow fewer than the required number of mowings per year.
Mowing Frequency
Service Level A - All turf areas shall be mowed once per week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and at least once every other week, or as needed, during the period of November 1st through
February 28th (February 29th in leap years).
Service Level B - All turf areas shall be mowed once per week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap
years).
Page 236
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 59
Service Level C - All turf areas shall be mowed every other week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap
years).
b) Edging
All turf grass borders including but not limited to valve boxes, curbs, mow curbs, pads, headers, turf and
planter interfaces without headers, sidewalks, and tree wells, shall be neatly and uniformly edged
concurrently with every mowing. Mechanical methods shall be used except where physically not possible or
practical. Tree wells and valve boxes in turf areas shall be trimmed concurrently with each mowing. Trimming
shall be done in a manner to prevent any damage to the tree trunk. "Arbor-Guards" or approved equal shall
be kept in place at all times on all tree trunks 4” in diameter or less within turf areas. Bare-soil tree wells are
required in all turf areas and shall be maintained by chemical, not mechanical means.
Edging Frequency
Service Level A- Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders once per week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and at least once every other week, or as needed,
during the period of November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap years). In addition, an
edger with a metal blade will be required for use on all turf grass borders at least once per month during
the period of March 1st through October 31st.
Service Level B - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders once per week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st
through February 28th (February 29th in leap years). In addition, an edger with a metal blade will be
required for use on all turf grass borders at least once per month during the period of March 1st through
October 31st.
Service Level C - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders every other week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st
through February 28th (February 29th in leap years). An edger with a metal blade will not be required as
part of the turf maintenance program at Service Level C.
c) Fertilization
Fertilizer shall be applied in such a manner as to insure uniform coverage with minimum overlap. Turf shall
be free of moisture at the time of application. Application of the fertilizer shall be done in sections coinciding
with the areas covered by the timing stations on the automatic controllers in order that the soil may be
thoroughly moistened immediately after the broadcast of fertilizer.
All damages resulting from the use of unauthorized fertilizers or improper watering after fertilization shall be
repaired or replaced at the expense of the Contractor.
Page 237
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 30 of 59
Fertilization Frequency
Service Level A - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
Service Level B - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
Service Level C - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
The City may request fertilization in addition to the above-described work. Any additional fertilization
requested requires written pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent and will be paid as
extra work.
d) Aeration
Aeration Frequency
Service Level A - The contractor shall mechanically aerate all turf areas in spring and fall. The contractor shall
use a core type aerator with ½ inch tines or approved equal. The aeration period will be recorded on the
Maintenance Schedule Chart and should be performed prior to scheduled fertilizing, dethatching,
overseeding, or pre-emergent applications. Do not aerate for at least 3 months following turf pre-emergent
applications or as directed on the pesticide label. In areas where soil conditions are poor, top dressing may
be required. The application of top dressing would be paid as an extra work.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall not be required to aerate turf areas.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall not be required to aerate turf areas.
e) Overseeding (Overseeding requires written pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent
and will be paid as extra work.)
All overseeding shall be done with a seed type or blend approved by the Public Works Services Director. The
Contractor shall over seed where needed in such a manner as to insure uniform growth with minimum bare
areas. One month prior to overseeding, the Contractor shall notify the Public Works Services Director for
approval of scope of work.
Overseeding will be scheduled either in early fall or early spring. Fertilization and overseeding will be
concurrently applied.
Prior to overseeding, the area will be dethatched as required.
Grass seed shall be applied at the rate specified on the label for the type of seed being used. Seed quality
shall meet the following criteria: Minimum purity shall be 98% weed free for all grasses; minimum
germination rate shall be 85% for all grasses; no seed shall be applied without prior verification of seed mix
and quality by the Public Works Services Director.
Once seed has been applied, the contractor shall firm the soil and cover the seed with a high-quality compost
top dressing to prevent erosion and reduce evaporation of soil moisture.
Pre-emergent herbicide applications shall be applied no sooner than three (3) mowings following seed
germination. Overseeding shall not be done within at least four months of any pre-emergent herbicide
application or as directed on the pesticide label – whichever length of time is greater.
4.26.2. SHRUB, GROUNDCOVER, DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) AND VINE MAINTENANCE
Page 238
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 31 of 59
4.26.2.1. SHRUB MAINTENANCE
Note: Shrub maintenance shall be performed at the service level for which ground cover maintenance is
contracted. Payment for shrub maintenance shall be included in the price proposed for groundcover
maintenance.
All shrubs growing in the work areas shall be pruned, as specified herein, to consistently maintain plants in a
healthy, growing condition, and to maintain plant growth within reasonable bounds to prevent encroachment
of passageways, walks, adjacent properties, streets, view of signs, traffic or in any manner deemed
objectionable by the Public Works Services Director. Dead or damaged limbs or branches shall be removed
immediately, and all pruning cuts shall be made cleanly with sharp pruning tools, with no projections or stubs
remaining.
Shrub Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant, or
other area into which it should not encroach such that a neatly trimmed appearance and hazard free condition
is consistently maintained.
The Contractor shall on a weekly basis clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall fertilize 100% of all ground cover areas two times per year in the spring and fall with 15-
15-15 or approved equal. All other applications that may be requested by the Public Works Director shall be
paid as extra work. Fertilization periods shall be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
The Contractor shall mechanically "bowl", as often as is required, around all irrigation heads that are blocked by
ground cover.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a monthly basis trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape,
structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly basis clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall fertilize 100% of all ground cover areas once per year in the spring with 15-15-15 or
approved equal. All other applications that may be requested by the Public Works Director shall be paid as extra
work. Fertilization periods shall be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any groundcover deemed a
public safety hazard.
The Contractor shall mechanically "bowl", as often as is required, around all irrigation heads that are blocked by
ground cover.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall on a bi-monthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent to any
hardscape, structure, fixture, plant, or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly schedule clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover
areas.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize ground cover.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height
of three inches all ground cover that is a fire hazard.
Page 239
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 32 of 59
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any groundcover deemed a
public safety hazard.
The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around each irrigation head that
is blocked by ground cover.
4.26.2.2. GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE
Trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant, or other area into which it should not
encroach including, but not limited to, walks, walls, curbs, mow curbs and fences as required for general
containment to present a neat, clean appearance of the planter and surrounding hardscapes within the
landscape site.
All sidewalks, mow curbs, boxes, etc. shall be edged completely with all remaining soil, groundcover and other
debris removed completely off these surfaces. A flat shovel will often be required to conform with this
specification.
Any paper, litter, or other debris including, but not limited to, excessive pine needles or leaf litter, large rocks,
or anything else that accumulates in ground cover areas, shall be picked up concurrent with trimming.
Keep ground cover trimmed back from all controller units, valve boxes, quick couplers, or other appurtenances
or fixtures. Do not allow ground covers to grow up trees, into shrubs, or on structures or walls. Keep it trimmed
back approximately 4 inches from structures or walls. Coordinate trimming around base of shrubs/trees with
the City Representative.
Bare soil areas shall be replanted, composted, or wood chipped as directed. Coordinate replanting/chipping
with the City Representative. The contractor shall pay the costs to replant/mulch bare soil areas caused by
contractor negligence. Negligence includes (but is not limited to) the failure to provide water to sites that cannot
be repaired in a reasonable amount of time due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor.
Groundcover Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall on a monthly basis trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape, structure,
fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly basis clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall fertilize 100% of all ground cover areas once per year in the spring with 15-15-15 or
approved equal. All other applications that may be requested by the Public Works Director shall be paid as extra
work. Fertilization periods shall be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any groundcover deemed a
public safety hazard.
The Contractor shall mechanically "bowl", as often as is required, around all irrigation heads that are blocked by
ground cover.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a bi-monthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent to any hardscape,
structure, fixture, plant, or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly schedule clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover
areas.
Page 240
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 33 of 59
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize ground cover.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height
of three inches all ground cover that is a fire hazard.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any groundcover deemed a
public safety hazard.
The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around each irrigation head that
is blocked by ground cover.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall on a monthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent to any hardscape,
structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a monthly schedule clean any accumulated debris and trash from all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize ground cover.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any groundcover deemed a
public safety hazard.
4.26.2.3. DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG)
To reduce water use, maintenance, and run-off; some areas within this contract may currently (or in the future)
contain relatively small areas of DG as a landscape element. These relatively low maintenance areas are
contained within the landscape and do not include equestrian and walking trails. DG areas shall be inventoried
and paid at the same monthly unit cost as groundcover.
Any paper, litter, rocks, trash, or other debris that accumulates in these DG areas shall be picked up at the
frequencies specified in Section 4.26.5, Debris and Trash Removal.
The Contractor shall provide complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all weeds, roots, suckers,
and pests. Pests include, but are not limited to insects, other invertebrates, and rodents. Pests may be
controlled by mechanical means as well as with chemicals.
The contractor shall provide maintenance of all non-trail DG surfaces within the landscape at no additional cost
to the City. Maintenance shall include but will not be limited to filling and compacting low areas, ruts, washed-
out areas, vandalized areas, and any other area deemed hazardous.
Maintenance shall include not only the repairs but shall also include the removal of eroded or contaminated DG
materials from sidewalks, drains, curbs, gutters, cobble, turf areas, planters, and any other areas where the DG
does not belong. Eroded DG materials shall not be re-used in the trails or landscape and these materials shall
be disposed of off-site at no additional cost to the City.
Surface repair materials shall be clean and uncontaminated stabilized California Gold DG maintained at Header,
sidewalk, and curb height. DG is available from Gail Materials in Corona, CA Phone no. (951) 667-6106.
Submittal of all DG materials to the Public Works Services Director (or his agent) is required prior to any and all
surface repairs. Materials placed without prior approval that do not meet City specifications will be removed
and replaced at the expense of the contractor.
Proper placement will require good preparation, wetting and compaction. DG shall be placed, wetted, and
compacted at no more than 2” of lift at a time. In some cases, an additional lift may be required for the repair.
Page 241
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 34 of 59
Remove rocks, debris and loose materials and grade smooth. For each 2” of lift, spread the material over the
area and grade level and smooth. Take the time necessary to thoroughly water the entire area to ensure the
entire depth and profile is moist. Use a shovel to confirm moisture depth. Once properly wetted, roll, vibra-
plate, or tamp the surface and allow enough time to dry. The surface shall be flush with all curbs, walks, headers
and drains. In some instances, it may be necessary to build the material ¼” higher than the hardscapes to
promote proper drainage.
Decomposed Granite Surface Repair Frequency
Service Level A - Surface repairs including the off-site removal and disposal of eroded and/or contaminated DG
materials shall be complete and continuous as required.
Service Level B - Surface repairs shall be performed in May when the rainy season has ended, or when it
has been determined by the Public Works Services Director (or his agent) that there is an immediate safety
hazard. The off-site removal and disposal of eroded DG materials shall be complete and continuous as required.
Service Level C - Except for the removal of eroded materials, surface repairs will be completed by City
crews. The off-site removal and disposal of eroded DG materials shall be performed by the contractor
completely and continuously as required.
4.26.2.4. VINE MAINTENANCE
Vines are to be maintained such that they always present a neat appearance and are not a public hazard.
To help prevent vines from falling off the wall, vines are to be trimmed and maintained closely to the wall to
which they are attached.
Vines that are not growing over the top of a wall will not be allowed to grow over the top.
Vines that are growing over the top of a wall will be neatly trimmed on the city side and along the top without
allowing clippings to fall onto the homeowner's side.
Cut as few vines growing over to the homeowner's side as is necessary to achieve a neat appearance on the top
of the wall but attempting not to kill the vines on the homeowner's side. If a homeowner requests that the
City's vines be removed from the homeowner's side, remove them by pulling the vines from the homeowner's
side to the City side and trimming off the excess.
In addition to trimming vines at the top of the wall, vines shall also be trimmed along the bottom of the wall to
prevent them from encroaching into and damaging irrigation, groundcover, hardscapes, trees, shrubs, trails,
and sidewalks.
The Contractor will not remove any vines from the homeowner's side without the homeowner's permission.
The Contractor will reattach to a wall any vines that fall off a wall by using the attachments detailed on City
Standard Plan #510.
Vine Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall trim vines as often as required such that they consistently present a neat
appearance.
The Contractor shall immediately re-attach to a wall any vines that fall off a wall or fence by using the
attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
Page 242
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 35 of 59
The Contractor shall ensure that no vines grow into undesirable places such as groundcover, hardscapes, trees
or shrubs.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall trim vines twice per year in March and September.
The Contractor shall immediately re-attach to a wall or fence any vines that fall off a wall by using the
attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
Concurrent with March and September vine trimming, the Contractor shall twice per year remove vines that
grow into undesirable places such as groundcover, hardscapes, trees, or shrubs.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall trim vines once per year in Fall.
The Contractor shall re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in Fall vines that fall off the wall by using the
attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
The Contractor shall annually, in Fall, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places such as groundcover,
hardscapes, trees or shrubs.
4.26.2.5. TREE MAINTENANCE
a) All trees in the work site shall be maintained in their natural shapes. Work shall be accomplished in a
manner which will ensure that each individual tree is carefully maintained as described in Appendix A,
Pruning Standards, to promote the health and appearance of the tree. All work shall be of the highest
quality, performed in accordance with the International Society of Arboriculture's (ISA) standards. The
Contractor shall only be responsible for tree pruning as called out herein. Tree work not described herein
will be the responsibility of the City’s Urban Forestry Division and their tree maintenance contractor.
b) Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets shall be raised to a
height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade. Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall
be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above grade. Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be
raised to a height of ten (10) feet.
c) Young trees that need training shall be pruned on a continuing basis as needed. Under no circumstances
will stripping of lower branches (raising up) of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be
retained in a "tipped back" or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote
establishment, increased caliper, and a strong tapered trunk. If there are any doubts or questions,
contract the Public Works Services Director or his representative.
d) On all newly planted and unestablished trees (except for palms) Agriform 20-10-5 Plant Tablets (or
approved equal) shall be applied as per the manufacturer's directions. All Date Palms shall be fertilized
in spring and fall with an approved Palm specific fertilizer. Fan Palms shall not be fertilized unless
otherwise directed by the Public Works Director.
e) The Contractor shall bring to the attention of the Public Works Services Director within twenty-four (24)
hours any tree that shows signs of root heaving, leaning, having hanger limbs, or for any reason is a
safety hazard.
f) The City shall bear all costs for the removal and replacement of dead or dying trees unless the need for
removal was due to faulty maintenance or negligence. Faulty maintenance or negligence includes (but
is not limited to) mower and string-trimmer damage. The Contractor, as determined by The Public Works
Page 243
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 36 of 59
Services Director, shall replace trees requiring replacement due to faulty maintenance or negligence.
Replacement shall be made by the Contractor in the kind and size of trees as determined by the Public
Works Services Director. Where there is a difference in value between the trees lost and the
replacement of trees, this difference will be deducted from the contract payment. In all cases, the value
of the trees lost will be determined by the Public Works Services Director using the latest edition of ISA’s
“Guide for Plant Appraisal” written by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.
g) All trees requiring staking shall always be securely staked with two approved stakes set perpendicular to
prevailing NE winds and secured to the stakes with at least two flexible ties and approved by the Public
Works Services Director. The ties and stakes shall be inspected regularly to ensure against girdling and
abrasion. Stakes shall not be allowed to touch the trunk or any major lateral branches. Therefore,
reducing the height of the stakes may be required to prevent damage. Stakes shall be removed as soon
as it is determined that a tree can stand on its own without support. Should 36-inch box or larger sized
trees need guying, the cost shall be paid by the City.
h) Except for irrigation, debris removal, and fall and spring fertilization, the City shall perform all
maintenance on palm trees within the worksite.
Tree Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks,
parkways, and equestrian trails shall continuously be maintained at the following heights above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park maintenance driveways, and all streets shall be raised to a height of
thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above
grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10) feet above grade.
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs and surrounding
plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
The Contractor shall maintain young trees in a "tipped-back", not stripped, condition.
The Contractor shall maintain the staking for each tree requiring staking in accordance with the current
City tree planting standard.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be immediately
reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Service Level B - Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks,
parkways, and equestrian trails shall continuously be maintained at the following heights above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park maintenance driveways, and all streets shall be raised to a height of
thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above
grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10) feet above grade.
Page 244
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 37 of 59
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs and
surrounding plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
The Contractor shall maintain young trees in a "tipped-back", not stripped, condition.
The Contractor shall maintain the staking for each tree requiring staking in accordance with the
current City tree planting standard.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be immediately
reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Service Level C - As often as required for safety purposes, low branches overhanging park and paseo
maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks, parkways, and equestrian trails shall be raised to the following
heights above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park maintenance driveways and all streets shall be raised to a height of
thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above
grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10) feet above grade.
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed in Fall as to not encroach onto shrubs and surrounding
plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance. hanging tree branches shall
be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs and surrounding plant materials as well as
provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be immediately
reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Young trees requiring staking or training shall be reported to the Public Works Services Director.
4.26.3. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE
(Except as noted herein, payment for all irrigation work shall be included in the Turf and Groundcover line
items.)
4.26.3.1. GENERAL
a) Irrigation shall be done using automatic sprinkler systems where available and operable. However,
failure of an existing irrigation system to provide full and proper coverage shall not relieve the Contractor
of the responsibility to provide adequate irrigation with full and proper coverage to all areas within the
work site. Providing full and adequate coverage may require hand watering, a station master, a battery
backup, or a water tender. This type of watering may be billed as an extra on a case-by-case basis
depending upon the circumstances. Failure to comply with this specification resulting in loss of plant
material will be subject to the remedies in section 4.21, Replacement of Landscape Materials & City
Property. Field controllers are installed for scheduling. The field controllers communicate with a central
computer to receive daily evapotranspiration data.
b) The irrigation schedule for each controller will be set by the City’s Water Management Team along with
regular input from the contractor's account manager. The elements of the schedule to be set by City
Staff are days of the week to irrigate, start times, finish times, minutes per cycle, soak in times, demand
Page 245
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 38 of 59
and percentage of daily evapo-transpiration per station and assignment of stations to programs. These
settings will be done within the guidelines established by the City.
c) The Contractor will be expected to use the absolute minimum amounts of water in all areas required to
maintain healthy plant growth. With regular required contractor input, the Water Management Team
will adjust the soil depletion numbers and percentages of evapo-transpiration for each station on the
field controller to ensure that the zone covered by each station is not too dry or too wet.
d) The Contractor shall periodically inspect the operation of the systems for any malfunction. The
Contractor shall maintain all sprinkler systems, at no additional cost to the City, in such a way as to:
guarantee proper coverage and full working capability; and make whatever adjustments may be
necessary (including raising the sprinkler heads to the proper height) in order to provide proper irrigation
to plants and to prevent excessive runoff into street rights-of-way or other areas not meant to be
irrigated.
e) The periodic inspections may occur more often, but not less frequently than one inspection each week.
No watering shall be done during the day unless approved by the Public Works Services Director. The
Contractor must provide adequate personnel to observe any irrigation system operations during the day.
f) In addition to the weekly inspections, written quarterly irrigation system reports will also be required for
each landscape site in the contract. Reports shall include but are not limited to the following information:
name of inspector, site number, date, recommended schedule changes, recommended upgrades, soil
moisture and depth, repairs made, repairs needed, overall coverage and distribution, and overall
condition of the turf, planters, and trees. Reports shall be attached to the monthly routine billing and
will be required for monthly payment.
g) Sprinkler heads will be kept clear of overgrowth that may obstruct operation. Chemical edging with
herbicides around turf heads will not be permitted. However, an approved plant growth regulator may
be used.
h) Any damages to public or private property resulting from excessive irrigation water or irrigation water
runoff shall be charged against the contract payment unless immediate repairs are made by the
Contractor to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director.
i) The centralized irrigation control will be operated by City employees. The field controllers communicate
alerts to the Centralized irrigation control.
4.26.3.2. SHRUB BEDS & PLANTER AREAS
Shrub beds and planter areas shall be irrigated as required, to maintain horticulturally acceptable growth and
color, and to promote deep rooting. Irrigation rates for shrub and planter areas shall be applied in such a
manner as to keep surface runoff at a minimum. The irrigation rates shall be adjusted to the needs of shrub
types, seasons, weather conditions, and water budget.
4.26.3.3. TURF AREAS
Turf areas shall be irrigated as required to maintain acceptable growth and color. Turf areas shall be maintained
using the least amount of water possible. These low waters use specifications will cause some slight stress.
However, if horticultural programs such as regular aerification, correct mower heights, proper fertility, weed
Page 246
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 39 of 59
control, and required system maintenance/programming is implemented, the stress should be mild enough for
the turf plants to recover quickly when irrigated. Irrigation shall be applied in such a manner as to reduce runoff
yet provide deep watering to promote deep rooting and improved drought resistance.
4.26.3.4. NEW PLANT MATERIALS
Newly planted trees, shrubs, ground cover and turf shall receive adequate and regular attention until these
plants are established. Adequate water shall be applied to promote normal, healthy growth. Proper berms or
basins shall be maintained during the establishment period. Routine supplemental deep watering either by
quick coupler, water tender, or by the installation of a supplemental irrigation system will be required to avoid
dead plant material as well as the prevention of overwatering established plants located on the same hydro-
zone.
4.26.3.5. REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT
Routine repairs to irrigation systems such as replacement of wiper seals, worn or broken nozzles, heads and
risers and other routine maintenance shall be completed by the Contractor at no cost to the City. Replaced or
newly installed irrigation heads shall be identical to the heads specified in the approved City Standard Plans
unless otherwise specified by the Public Works Services Director or his representative. Further, any other
irrigation work shall also conform to the current approved City Standard Plans. Any deviation from these plans
is considered a variance and all variances shall be approved in writing by the Public Works Services Director or
his representative prior to the commencement of any work.
Costs of repairs to backflow preventers, pressure lines, valves, irrigation pumps and controllers requires written
pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent and will be paid as extra work. Additionally, costs of
repairs beyond the control of the Contractor such as vandalism, vehicular accidents, acts of nature, or other
events not deemed contractor negligence shall also be paid as extra work. Any irrigation repairs requested by
the Public Works Services Director (including but not limited to alerts) are required to be expeditiously corrected
within a reasonable amount of time.
4.26.4. PEST CONTROL
The Contractor shall provide complete control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds at the frequencies
specified herein. Pests include, but are not limited to, insects, mites, other invertebrates, pathogens,
nematodes, and vertebrates. Pests may be controlled by mechanical means as well as with chemicals. Chemical
controls may include plant growth regulators.
Annually at the time of contract renewal, the Contractor shall submit a list for approval by the Public Works
Services Director of all chemical pesticides proposed for use under this contract. Attached to the list will be the
current label and safety data sheet (SDS), for each chemical on the list. Additionally, any changes or updates
made to this list shall be supplied to the Public Works Services Director as they are made. Materials included
on this list shall be limited to chemicals approved for use by the State of California Department of Food and
Agriculture. No chemical pesticide shall be applied until its use is approved in writing by the Public Works
Services Director. The application of chemicals shall conform to the current California Department of Food and
Agriculture regulations.
Page 247
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 40 of 59
Use of all E.P.A. registered pesticides must be preceded by notification to the Public Works Services Director a
minimum of one week prior to the planned application date. The notification must be in writing and shall include
the pest control advisor's written recommendation and State of California Agriculture Pest Control Advisor
License number. A permit from the County Agricultural Commissioner's office to apply any restricted use
pesticide must be obtained, and a notice of intent shall be filed at least forty-eight (48) hours before applications
with the San Bernardino County Agricultural Commissioner's office as per State and County guidelines.
Only the safest, lowest odor and most environmentally friendly pesticides shall be used whenever possible. In
addition, integrated pest management techniques shall also be used whenever possible, e.g., use of approved
biological, mechanical, or exclusionary control methods.
The Contractor shall select and supply proper materials and licensed personnel and obtain any necessary
permits, licenses, registrations, and pest control advisor recommendations, to comply with City, County, State
or Federal regulations and laws. Copies of all County and State licenses, registrations, and permits required shall
be supplied to the Public Works Services Director on an annual basis. The contractor will assume responsibility
and liability for the use of all chemicals and their applications.
Spray pattern indicators or dye markers shall not be used anywhere within this contract without the expressed
written consent of the Public Works Services Director.
The Contractor's applicator shall hold a valid Qualified Applicator License or a Certified Commercial Applicator
Certificate, issued by the State of California Department of Food and Agriculture, and be certified, or licensed,
in at least Categories B and C. The Contractor must supply the City with a photocopy of the License or Certificate.
If subcontractors are used for any pesticide applications, photocopies of their License or Certificate, County
Registration and City Business License must be provided.
Pest control advisor recommendations shall be written for all types of chemical applications made in City parks
or rights-of-way. Recommendations shall be written on forms approved by the San Bernardino County
Agricultural Commissioner and a copy shall be provided to the Public Works Services Director prior to the
application for his approval. All recommendations shall follow the guidelines set forth by the State and County
Departments of Food and Agriculture, regarding pest control advisor recommendations. Pest control
recommendations are registered by the County for one calendar year in January. Therefore, updated
recommendations shall be submitted every January.
Pesticide application records shall be kept on forms identical to the format provided in Schedule II. A copy of
each application form shall be provided to the City at the time of monthly invoicing.
Additionally, and prior to bid acceptance or contract renewal, the contractor shall provide to the Public Works
Services Director a schedule outlining a written annual integrated pest management plan describing what
products and/or alternative methods of pest control that will be scheduled each month. This monthly
information shall include:
• The target pest (gophers, grassy weeds, broadleaf weeds, shrub growth, insects, etc.)
• The type of control method to be used (mechanical, chemical, cultural)
• Where the method of control will be used (turf, hardscape, groundcover, mulchscape)
• The name of the product to be used (Roundup Pro, Dimension, Ronstar, etc.)
Page 248
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 41 of 59
• The type of product to be used (Pre-emergent, PGR, insecticide, rodenticide, etc.)
• The application rate to be used (lbs. or Oz’s. per acre or per 1000 sq. ft.)
Pest Control Frequency
Service Level A - Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all Landscape pests and weeds.
Service Level A - Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all Landscape pests and weeds.
Service Level B - Complete, thorough, and consistent control and eradication of all Landscape pests and
weeds within the landscape every 90 days or whenever the Public Works Services Director determines that a
pest or weed problem has become a public health or safety hazard. Complete, thorough, and consistent control
of weeds shall include the use of pre-emergent herbicides broadcast over the entire planter area, as well as post
emergent herbicides spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control. Complete, thorough, and
consistent weed control utilizing the proper selection and application of herbicides on schedule, will result in a
relatively acceptable level of control for this reduced service level lasting the entire length of the 90-day period.
Pest Control Frequency – Weed Abatement at Central Park
Service Level C - Complete, thorough, and consistent control of all landscape pests and weeds within the
landscape every 90 days or whenever the Public Works Services Director determines that a pest or
weed problem has become a public health or safety hazard. Complete, thorough, and consistent
control of weeds shall include the use of pre-emergent herbicides broadcast over the entire area, as
well as post emergent herbicides spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control.
Service Level D - Complete, thorough, and consistent control of all landscape pests and weeds within the
landscape two times per year or whenever the Public Works Services Director determines that a pest
or weed problem has become a public health or safety hazard. Complete, thorough, and consistent
control of weeds shall include the use of pre-emergent herbicides broadcast over the entire area, as
well as post emergent herbicides spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control.
Service Level F - Complete, thorough, and consistent control of all landscape pests and weeds within the
landscape once per year or whenever the Public Works Services Director determines that a pest or
weed problem has become a public health or safety hazard. Complete, thorough, and consistent
control of weeds shall include the use of pre-emergent herbicides broadcast over the entire area, as
well as post emergent herbicides spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control.
4.26.5. TRAIL MAINTENANCE
Some sites within the Contract will have trails. Trails are defined as any PVC fencing and/or headers delineating
one or both sides of a decomposed granite (DG) surface and the decomposed granite itself. Trail maintenance
and surface repairs may be required and will be paid as extra work. The scheduling of any trail repairs shall
occur at the direction of the Public Works Services Director. The City will be responsible for all other trail
maintenance within the Parks except for excessive irrigation runoff and encroaching plant material from
contractor-maintained landscapes; debris caused by landscape maintenance; eroded mulch and soil from
contractor-maintained sites, broken PVC fencing caused by Contractor negligence; and, any other trail
maintenance problem caused by Contractor negligence.
Page 249
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 42 of 59
a) All roadways and exercise stations surfaced with decomposed granite shall be maintained in a smooth,
safe, compacted condition.
b) At the City’s expense, decomposed granite shall be imported as necessary to maintain surfaces.
Imported decomposed granite shall meet or exceed the quality of the existing material, have a stabilizing
compound and must be approved by the Public Works Services Director prior to placement.
c) Any significant ruts or trail hazards must be immediately reported to the Public Works Services Director
or his representative.
4.26.6. HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
Hardscape is all masonry or rock materials on a site from the edge of the asphalt/curb and gutter to the tract
wall – the edge of the asphalt/curb and gutter shall include the crack or void between the asphalt and the
concrete. Hardscape includes features within the landscape such as curbs, mow curbs, cobblestones, concrete
pavers and concrete flowlines and sidewalks. All hardscape is to be maintained within the landscape site
(including sidewalks) at the frequencies listed below. Maintenance shall include keeping the hardscape clean,
debris- and weed free by using whatever approved methods are necessary. Graffiti removal is not required but
known instances of graffiti shall be reported immediately to the City Graffiti Hotline at 909-481-7999. Also, any
spills, stains or damage on the hardscape shall be reported to the Public Works Services Director or his
representative. This contract may or may not have hardscapes listed separately on a site inventory or paid
separately from the turf and groundcover areas. In either case, all hardscapes shall be maintained as part of
the landscape maintenance contract at the same service level as the adjacent landscape.
Service Level A - The Contractor shall, on a weekly basis remove any weeds, trash and debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a bi- weekly basis, remove any weeds, trash and debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall, on a bi-weekly basis, remove any weeds, trash and or debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
4.26.7. MULCHSCAPE MAINTENANCE
“Mulchscape” refers to formerly landscaped areas that have been renovated and removed from regular contract
maintenance. These areas will be covered with a layer of composted mulch and/or wood chips and use little or
no water. Any trees growing within the mulchscaped sites will remain after conversion. Additionally, some low-
maintenance shrubs and groundcover may remain whenever practical. Any maintenance on remaining
groundcover or shrubs within the mulchscaped areas may be billed as extra work. Maintenance of these areas
will include the following:
Service Level A - Mulchscaped areas will be consistently maintained on a weekly basis to present a neat
and clean appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
In May of each year, mulch will be added to all mulchscaped areas as required to restore the depth of mulch to
three inches throughout each mulchscaped site. Submittals are required for approval by the Public Works
Services Director or his representative on all materials prior to installation.
Page 250
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 43 of 59
Service Level B - Mulchscaped areas will be consistently maintained on a weekly basis to present a neat
and clean appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
In May of each year, mulch will be added to all mulchscaped areas as required to restore the depth of mulch to
three inches throughout each mulchscaped site. Submittals are required for approval by the Public Works
Services Director or his representative on all materials prior to installation.
Service Level C - On a bi-weekly basis, mulchscaped areas will be maintained to present a neat and clean
appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
When specified by the Public Works Services Director, mulch shall be applied by the contractor to a depth of no
less than three inches and billed as extra work. Submittals are required for approval by the Public Works Services
Director or his representative on all materials prior to installation.
4.26.8. SPORTS FIELD MAINTENANCE
Renovations
Sports fields may be renovated annually. Any renovations will be paid as extra work. The scheduling of the
annual renovation process shall occur at the direction of the Public Works Services Director which may change
yearly according to team’s schedules. The fields shall be closed to public access for a period of 8-12 weeks for
the renovation and re-establishment to occur. The field perimeters shall be fenced for this period of time.
The field perimeter shall be enclosed by installing temporary chain-link fencing. The fencing shall be 8 feet in
height and have gated vehicular access to the fields at all parks. Each field shall be gated individually to ensure
non-interference with track use during the renovation period. The chain-link fencing shall be installed and
removed at the Contractor’s expense. Installation and removal dates shall be set by the Public Works Services
Director. All fence failures shall be repaired immediately at the Contractor’s expense.
4.26.9. PLAYGROUND MAINTENANCE
Playground Inspections
Routine inspections shall be conducted daily by a responsible, trained employee of the Contractor. The
Contractor shall inspect the playground areas for obvious safety concerns such as vandalism, necessary raking
of surfacing materials, missing signage, walkway debris, and hazard removal.
The Contractor shall inspect each piece of playground equipment in accordance with the High Frequency
Inspection form and guide provided by the Public Works Services Department. Documentation of High
Frequency Inspections may be performed using the High Frequency Form. Forms will be delivered on a daily
basis to the City’s Parks Facilities Maintenance Supervisor.
4.26.10. PICNIC AREA MAINTENANCE
Picnic tables, benches, slabs, cooking grills, sinks, trash containers and receptacles shall be cleaned and
sanitized to ensure safe conditions for use by the public. Picnic tables and benches shall be checked for
graffiti, carvings, looseness of planks or braces, cleanliness and general need of repair. The Contractor’s
observation of the general need of repair or replacement of fixtures shall be immediately reported to the
Public Works Services Director orally and thereafter in writing.
Page 251
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 44 of 59
Ashes partially burned charcoal, garbage and leftover food in and around cooking grills and picnic facilities
shall be removed. The entire picnic area shall be kept free of broken glass, cans, food, paper, and other
debris. Picnic areas shall be pressure-washed as directed.
4.26.11. HARD COURT MAINTENANCE
Hard playing court surfaces shall be swept on a weekly basis. The contractor will not be responsible for the
replacement of worn netting or wind screens.
4.26.12. RESTROOM MAINTENANCE
All restrooms shall be cleaned thoroughly in accordance with the following tasks, and all tasks shall be completed
prior to 8 a.m. unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Public Works Services Director. The City will be
responsible for locking the restrooms each night.
a) All stainless fixtures shall be cleaned at the scheduled interval specified below using a stainless cleaner
that removes hard water deposits, disinfects and polishes the fixtures.
b) Remove debris and trash, then sweep floor. Removed materials are not to be swept outside of the
restroom.
c) Wash down walls and floors as needed.
d) Check and refill all toilet paper dispensers as needed.
e) Remove all graffiti using graffiti removal materials, other scrubbing techniques, or paint.
f) Remove spitballs, cobwebs, and other foreign materials from doors, walls, ceilings, partitions, vents,
etc.
g) Perform high and low dusting of ledges, tops of partitions, etc. using a dampened cloth or other device.
h) Disinfect the inside of urinals and toilets.
i) Disinfect the top and bottom of toilet seats, fixtures, and surfaces of and surrounding each fixture.
j) Disinfect stall walls and other areas where hands are normally placed. Clean doors and door frames.
k) Disinfect around urinals, under sinks, around floor drains, and other areas where bacteria might breed.
l) Disinfect sinks.
m) Scrub sinks and wipe dry. Use a small scrub brush to clean corners, cracks, and narrow areas.
n) Scrub inside surfaces of toilets and urinals using a hard water cleaner that will remove hard water
stains and deposits. Be sure to scrub under the upper lip.
o) Scrub outside of toilets, urinals, and rear wall.
p) Wipe toilet seats, toilet bowls, urinals, and fixtures until dry.
q) Spot clean walls and scrub handprints, etc. from walls and partitions and wipe dry.
r) Disinfect and mop floors, making sure that corners, drains, areas around toilets, and feet of partitions
are thoroughly cleaned and there is no accumulation of dirt or other matter. Leave the floor as dry as
possible.
s) Deodorize the restrooms.
t) Immediately notify the Public Works Services Director of any irregularities or hazards.
Page 252
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 45 of 59
u) If running water, broken fixtures, or plugged sewer lines cannot be normalized or isolated, the
restroom is to be locked, signed as “Closed for Maintenance,” and the Public Works Services Director
immediately notified.
v) Wash off any dirt clods, mud or foreign material from the outside of the restroom. Clean top and sides
of drinking fountains outside of restrooms and clear drains.
w) All areas are to be left clean and free of streaks, stains, film, debris, water spots, and odors. All fixtures
shall be clean, including piping.
x) All leaking fixtures, clogged drains, stopped up or damaged basins, toilets, or urinals, and damaged or
inoperable lighting fixtures that cannot be repaired by the following shall be reported to the Public
Works Services Director: (a) tightened to stop leaks, (b) unclogged by using a “plumber’s helper” or
short “snake”.
The Contractor shall submit a list for approval by the Public Works Services Director of all cleaners,
disinfectants and deodorizers proposed for use under this contract. Attached to the list will be the
current label and material safety data sheet for each product on the list. No product shall be used until
its use is approved in writhing by the Public Works Services Director as appropriate for the proposed
purpose.
4.26.13. PIPE CHASE MAINTENANCE
Dust, clean and sweep all pipe chases. Immediately clean up any spills and keep each pipe chase neat and clean
at all times. Pipe chases may be utilized by the Contractor for storing Contractor’s equipment and supplies
which shall be arranged in an organized and neat manner.
4.26.14. DRINKING FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE
Drinking fountains shall be cleaned by scrubbing, drying, and polishing the fixture. Stainless steel fountains
shall be cleaned with an approved stainless steel cleaner that cleans, disinfects, removes hard water deposits
and polishes the fixtures.
Leaking fixtures shall immediately be reported to the Public Works Services Director orally and thereafter in
writing. For leaking fixtures, the water valve shall be turned off. The City shall be responsible for the repair or
replacement of drinking fountains and fixtures.
4.26.15. TRASH RECEPTACLE MAINTENANCE
There are an unspecified number of trashcans within this contract and additional trash cans may be added as
required. Trash containers shall be emptied. All trash shall be placed in the appropriate trash bins which are
in the trash enclosures located in the parking lots of each park. Trash containers shall be emptied by removal
and disposal of a plastic trash bag within the container and a new bag placed into the container. Plastic trash
container and pet waste bags shall be provided by the Contractor.
Prior to replacement of the plastic trash bags, the container shall be inspected for debris and offensive odors,
then cleaned and sanitized as needed. If insect infestations are noted, pest control measures shall be
undertaken by the Contractor. Any trash can with damage, missing lids, graffiti or vandalism shall be reported
to the Public Works Services Director immediately.
Page 253
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 46 of 59
4.26.16. TRASH ENCLOSURE MAINTENANCE
All trash and accumulated debris within the enclosures shall be placed in the trash bin(s) each week or more
often as necessary. The enclosures shall be swept clean each week. The City shall be responsible for providing
all necessary trash bins and trash bin emptying.
4.26.17. GRAFFITI REMOVAL (All Service Levels)
The Contractor shall be responsible for all minor graffiti removal within and around restrooms, playground
and picnic shelters. All materials and processes used in graffiti removal shall be non-injurious to surfaces and
adjacent park property and approved by CAL-OSHA and the Public Works Services Director. Appropriate
surface preparation shall be made on painted walls, and paint applied shall be the exact shade of color as
existing paint, unless otherwise specifically approved by the Public Works Services Director. All paint shall be
furnished by the City.
All obscene and gang related graffiti shall be immediately reported to the Public Works Services Director and
removed within 24 hours. All other graffiti shall be reported and removed daily.
4.26.18. DRAINS (All Service Levels)
The Contractor shall be responsible for periodic inspections of surface flowlines, intake grates, and under
sidewalk drains located within the landscaped areas. These drains shall be inspected during, prior to, and
following any rain event. Any debris or vegetation that could block the flow of water will require prompt
removal.
4.26.19. STORM DEBRIS CLEANUP
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is subject to frequent wind, rain, and other types of storms. The storms cause
an accumulation of debris on the contracted sites. The debris includes such items as downed trees, limbs,
leaves, tumbleweeds, trash, and soil deposits. Because it is impractical to perform routine maintenance
operations during and immediately following these storms, the Contractor shall promptly remove the debris
such that routine maintenance operations are practical. Because the Contractor is removing debris in lieu of
routine maintenance, the removal is at no extra charge to the City. In the case of an excessive accumulation of
debris that is attributable to another agency, such as blown sand from a recently graded site, the City will act to
have the responsible agency remove the debris. The cost for replanting new plant material to replace storm
damaged plant material that cannot be repaired will be an extra.
Emergency Storm Work Documentation and Tracking:
All costs borne by the City for emergency storm clean-up work may be subject to re-imbursement through
government disaster funds. In the event of an emergency, the City could easily be eligible for Federal, State, or
local funds and therefore all costs that are storm related including labor, rentals and materials that are charged
to the City shall be recorded and billed separately and labeled/dated as emergency related. In addition, since
labor will be shifted away from routine work, all the shifted routine labor shall be tracked and recorded as
emergency related since emergency labor may also be reimbursable. Once the contractor returns to normal
operations, the contractor will be required to send a report outlining the shifted routine labor used during the
emergency.
Page 254
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 47 of 59
4.26.20. DEBRIS AND TRASH REMOVAL
Debris and Trash Removal Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates on the
landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and decomposed granite areas including
adjacent flowlines.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates on
the landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and decomposed granite areas including
adjacent flowlines.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates
on the landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and decomposed granite areas
including adjacent flowlines.
4.26.21. CLEAN-UP (All Service Levels)
a) At no time will the Contractor blow grass cuttings and/or debris into public streets, trails, or gutters
without promptly removing the cuttings and/or debris and disposing of it legally, off site.
b) Unless a chipper is used as described below in section 4.26.7(d), the Contractor shall remove all debris
resulting from the maintenance operations and legally dispose of it off-site. All grass or other clippings
shall be picked up after each mowing or trimming operation.
c) All debris resulting from any of the Contractor's operations shall be removed and disposed of legally at
the Contractor's expense. No debris will be allowed to remain at the end of the workday.
d) To improve the fertility of planter beds, save water, reduce weeds, reduce the amount of green waste
in the landfill, lower soil pH, and improve efficiency, the contractor may be required in many instances
to utilize a chipper to mulch brush clippings back into the landscape planter from where the clippings
had originated. The contractor will always be required to have a trained chipper operator on staff to
accommodate this request at no additional cost to the City. This chipper program will be used wherever
and whenever it is practical and will be utilized primarily wherever there are larger planter beds that are
not wood-chipped. Only clippings from shrubs and trees will be allowed. Grass clippings, leaves, palm
fronds, trash and weeds shall not be included in this program. The contractor shall always have a
commercial brush chipper available at no additional cost to the City.
e) All walkways will be kept clean/clear of debris and weed growth. Care shall be taken not to create
unnecessary hazards to the public.
f) Any paper, plastic, metal, leaves, pine needles, branches, rocks, DG, sand, soil, dead plant materials,
litter or any other debris determined objectionable by the Public Works Services Director that
accumulates within the work site shall be picked up weekly (or whenever the debris presents a hazard)
and legally disposed of offsite. All illegal dumping, including but not limited to hazardous waste, within
the work site shall be reported immediately to the Public Works Services Director or his representative.
4.27. EXTRA WORK
a) Extra work may be required because of vandalism, accidents, or acts of nature. Further, work may be
required to add new landscaping, or to delete or modify existing landscape.
Page 255
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 48 of 59
b) Extra work will not be performed without prior approval by the Public Works Services Director unless a
condition exists wherein it appears there is a danger of injury to persons or property.
c) Payment for extra work shall be in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices in the Extra Work
Schedule. The invoiced amount for material not listed in the schedule will be at the Contractor's cost
including sales tax plus 15%; the 15% being for the Contractor's costs of overhead.
d) Except for routinely billed and ordinary irrigation repairs, extra work shall not commence without a written
and approved proposal. Further, the extra work shall not be invoiced and billed until the work has been
inspected and approved for completeness by the Public Works Services Director.
e) The City reserves the right to cause any extra work deemed necessary by the Public Works Services Director
to be performed by City crews or other contractors, at no cost to the Contractor.
5. EVALUATION AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION PROCESS
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those
RFP responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the RFP requirement as indicated herein will
proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by
an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10),
ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will
be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Contractor Expertise 10
Quality of proposed services or goods 15
Extent to which the Contractors services or goods meet the City ’s
needs 25
Cost 15
Contractor’s history and resources available to provide the required
services 15
Experience and professional qualifications of staff 20
Page 256
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 49 of 59
5.3. COST EVALUATION
Cost Proposals are evaluated and scored based on the following calculations.
Score = Lowest Proposal Cost / Cost of Proposal being scored X Maximum Points Available (10)
The score is then added to the spreadsheet criteria scores.
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and the requesting
department may or may not be present during the process. The reference checks may be conducted by phone
with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Contractor’s reference
contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score
from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with
the criteria scores. It is imperative that Contractors provide up to date and accurate information regarding
contact information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Contractor ranking.
Evaluators do not see the Contractor References or pricing line items. The proposed pricing is evaluated by the
Procurement Division during the initial review of the RFP response, only to ensure that the proposed cost is not
over the City ’s budgeted amount or Not-to-Exceed amount for the project.
5.5. PRESENTATIONS / ORAL BOARD INTERVIEWS
Upon completion of the RFP evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked
Contractors will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to
further expand on their RFP response. Contractor interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking
of zero (0) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation
criteria factors as stated within the RFP.
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
Contractors that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its
Company’s financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department.
Should a Contractor wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon
completion of the review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation
will be required of each Contractor on the short-list:
• A copy of the Contractor’s most recent annual report.
• Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years.
• If audited data is not available, Contractor shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the
past three (3) years.
Page 257
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 50 of 59
• Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by
the Contractor.
• Indicate all applicable information regarding Contractor ownership changes in the last three (3)
years.
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER
Upon completion of Contractor presentations, the City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions
and/or pre-contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Contractors. At which time the City may request a
Best and Final Offer to be submitted from one or all finalists.
5.8. CONTRACTOR SELECTION
The final Contractor selection is based on which Contractor is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s
requirements, offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the
lowest price proposal.
The City may conduct negotiations with several Contractors simultaneously. The City may also negotiate
contract terms with the selected Contractors prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right,
unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part thereof, either separately or to
waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the
City.
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Contractor selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all
participating, responsive Contractors. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to
competing Contractors unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded
successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Contractor or withdraw the RFP
entirely.
Page 258
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 51 of 59
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT”
It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such
conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for
Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Contractors.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to
the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006 for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance I agree not
to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFP
response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited
to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP response,
or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and
agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Contractors)
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 259
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 52 of 59
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”
Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Contractors accepts the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Contractors proposes exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as
“Exception Summary”, which shall include the Contractors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each
exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the
submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 260
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 53 of 59
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________
(President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative)
of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the
(Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006 for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance have been read and understood and that our Contractors is
able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure to provide said coverage, upon
request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure
to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 261
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 54 of 59
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Contractors hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Contractors understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be
considered non-responsive. It is the Contractors’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and
download the number of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 262
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 55 of 59
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”
I certify that neither _____________________________ (Contractor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors
are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in
accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986
Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Contractor nor any of its proposed
subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Contractors or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or
debarment by a local, state, or federal government entity, or if Contractors or any of its subcontractors
subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 263
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 56 of 59
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may
utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of
________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner
or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of
such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of
its own order placement and payments of the Contractors.
Successful Contractors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please
specify.
YES __________ NO _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 264
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 57 of 59
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned Company declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms
and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE CONTRACTOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.
FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name:
Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address:
Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print)
Title:
Signature:
Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 265
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 58 of 59
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Page 266
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-006
for
Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 59 of 59
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibit H.
Page 267
PREPARED FOR:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement
10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Cheryl Combs
(909) 774-2505
Cheryl.combs@cityofrc.us
PREPARED BY:
Mariposa Landscapes Inc.
6232 Santos Diaz St, Irwindale, CA 91702
Dave Widjaja, Chief Estimator
(626) 426-1121
Dave.widjaja@mariposa-ca.com
RESPONSE TO:
RFP # 25/26-006
Request for Proposal for Park Mowing and Facility
Landscape Maintenance
June 5th, 2025
Page 268
Page 269
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 3
3.2 Table of Contents
Cover Letter .................................................................................................................. 2
3.3 Project Understanding and Approach ........................................................................ 4
3.4 Qualifications and Experience .................................................................................. 5
3.5 Project Team ......................................................................................................... 18
3.6 Staffing Level ......................................................................................................... 26
3.7 Third Party/ Subcontractors .................................................................................... 26
3.8 Proposal Response ................................................................................................ 29
Page 270
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 4
3.3 Project Understanding and Approach
We understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks a contractor capable of delivering
comprehensive, consistent, and high-quality landscape maintenance services across a wide range of
public spaces—including parks, fire stations, library, trail, and facilities—while upholding safety,
sustainability, and aesthetic standards.
Our approach is rooted in operational clarity, proactive oversight, and consistent communication. Our
team currently performs services for the listed sites and is fully familiar with their specific needs, seasonal
challenges, and patterns. We are committed to continuing these services without disruption and with
measurable improvements in quality and responsiveness.
Key elements of our approach include:
• Dedicated Staffing and Supervision: We will deploy specialized crews for turf mowing, detailing,
irrigation, and general maintenance, supported by a full-time Account Manager fluent in English.
The Fontana-based Area Manager, Dirk Bennet, will serve as the primary contract liaison,
overseeing execution, inspections, and reporting.
• Efficient Turf Maintenance: Using two 72" wide ride-on mowers, we will service all turf areas per
specified frequencies for Service Levels A–C. Edging and trimming will be done concurrently to
maintain clean lines and prevent overgrowth.
• Planter and Shrub Management: Detail crews will handle shrub and groundcover maintenance,
adjusting service intensity based on the designated service level. Weeds, debris, and overgrowth
will be proactively controlled.
• Irrigation Oversight: Irrigation crews will conduct weekly system checks, troubleshoot alerts, and
promptly perform repairs. Regular reporting and coordination with the City's Water Management
Team will ensure optimized water usage and compliance with environmental guidelines.
• Integrated Operations Schedule: Our team will follow a weekly maintenance chart aligned with
the City's expectations/ service level and seasonal requirements. Crews will rotate across
properties, enabling full coverage without service gaps.
• Communication and Responsiveness: Our Account Manager will be available on-site Monday–
Friday and on-call 24/7 for emergencies. We will maintain direct lines of communication with City
staff, provide required reports, and ensure all service-level adjustments are promptly
implemented.
Assumptions and Enhancements:
• All work will be performed per the scope and service levels outlined in Section 4 of the RFP.
• We anticipate periodic changes to site inventory and service levels and will respond with flexibility
and updated cost proposals as needed.
• We are exploring additional efficiency tools to enhance performance tracking and reduce the
administrative burden on City staff.
Our team is committed to maintaining a safe, clean, and welcoming public environment across Rancho
Cucamonga’s community space, reflecting the City’s high standards and expectations for its residents and
visitors.
Page 271
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 5
3.4 Qualifications and Experience
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. has been transforming outdoor spaces with expertise and innovation since
1977. What began as a small operation in Rosemead, California, has grown into one of the most trusted
names in landscaping across Southern California and Arizona. Today, we proudly employ over 800
dedicated professionals, including Certified Arborists, Pest Control Advisors, Certified Irrigators, and
Landscape Technicians.
Our Core Values
Our success is driven by a set of core values that underpin every aspect of our operations:
• Safety: Ensuring the well-being of our team and clients on every project.
• Teamwork: Collaborating with clients and stakeholders to achieve shared goals.
• Quality: Setting the highest standards for every service we provide.
• Integrity: Building trust through transparency, accountability, and ethical practices.
With over 45 years of experience, Mariposa is
renowned for excellence in Landscape
Construction, Maintenance, Tree Care, Irrigation,
and Drought-Tolerant Conversions. Our portfolio
reflects a rich history of award-winning projects -
more than 100 recognitions to date -
demonstrating our unwavering commitment to
quality and craftsmanship. As a fully licensed
company in both California and Arizona, we carry
$100 million in bonding capacity and maintain
large insurance coverage, including $10 million in
general liability and $1 million in workers'
compensation, ensuring our clients’ peace of mind
on every project.
At Mariposa, we are more than a landscaping company - we are stewards of the environment.
Sustainability is at the heart of everything we do, from implementing water-saving irrigation systems to
promoting native plant restoration and integrating environmentally friendly practices into every project.
Our approach is guided by a deep understanding of Southern California and Arizona’s unique ecosystems,
allowing us to create outdoor spaces that are as functional and beautiful as they are sustainable. We take
pride in enhancing landscapes while contributing to the well-being of the communities we serve.
Why Choose Mariposa Landscapes?
• Award-Winning Excellence: A proven track record with over 95 industry recognitions for
innovative and high-quality landscaping projects.
• Comprehensive Expertise: From public parks and commercial landscapes to large-scale
restoration projects, we have the expertise to handle a wide variety of landscaping needs.
• Sustainability Leadership: Implementing drought-resistant designs and sustainable practices that
protect natural resources while enhancing aesthetic value.
• Client-Centered Approach: A commitment to understanding and exceeding our clients’
expectations with tailored, results-driven solutions.
Page 272
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 6
Key Facts at a Glance
With strategically located offices across Southern California and Arizona, Mariposa Landscapes delivers
exceptional landscape solutions using advanced equipment, innovative technologies, and a skilled team,
transforming landscapes and enriching communities with every project.
The following table provides a complete overview of Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., highlighting our relevant
information, areas of expertise, and operational capabilities:
For this project, we will be working from our Fontana Branch at 11093 Almond Ave, Fontana, CA 92337.
Company Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.
(Corporation)
Awards Over 100 awards for project excellence
Founded 1977 Primary
Services
Landscape construction, maintenance,
tree care, irrigation, and drought tolerant
conversions
Address 6232 Santos Diaz St, Irwindale, CA
91702 (Headquarter)
Service Areas Southern California and Arizona
Telephone (626) 960-0196 Service Office
Locations
1) HQ: Irwindale, CA
2) Orange County: Santa Ana, CA
3) San Bernardino County: Fontana, CA
4) Riverside County: Chino, CA
5) LA South Bay: Gardena, CA
6) North LA. & Ventura: Somis, CA
7) Palm Springs: Bermuda Dunes, CA
8) San Diego County: Oceanside, CA
9) Arizona: Glendale, AZ
10) Arizona: Phoenix, AZ
Fax (626) 960-8477
Employees Over 800 employees
Licensed In California + Arizona
Insurance $1M workers’ compensation, $10M
general
Bonding $100 million
Organizations, Current and Past Memberships
• CACM (California Association of Community Managers)
• CAI Orange County (Community Association Institute)
• CAI Los Angeles (Community Associations Institute)
• CAI Greater Inland Empire (Community Association
Institute)
• CAI Coachella Valley (Community Association Institute)
• ASA (American Subcontractors Association)
• BIA Southern California (Building Industry Association)
• BIA Orange County (Building Industry Association)
• BOMA IE (Building Owners and Managers Association)
• CLCA (California Landscape Contractors Association)
• ISA (International Society of Arboriculture)
• CAPCA (California Association of Pest Control Advisors)
Licensing and Certifications
• California Contractor License
592268 C27, A, D49/C61, C31
• Certified Arborists on staff
• Certified Tree Workers on staff
• Tree Work – Line Clearance
Certified
• Tree Work – Line Clearance
Certified Instructor
• Certified Playground Equipment
Inspectors
• Certified Water Auditor
• Certified Backflow Inspectors
• Licensed Pest Control
Company/Pest Control Advisor
• Certified Pest Control Applicators
on staff
Proposal Contact: Dave Widjaja
Dave.widjaja@mariposa-ca.com
(626) 426-1121
Page 273
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 7
Our Services
Mariposa offers a full spectrum of landscaping services, blending expertise, innovation, and sustainability
to meet each client's unique needs. Below is an overview of our capabilities.
Landscape Maintenance
Maintaining vibrant landscapes requires strategic care and attention to detail. Our services encompass
large-scale mowing, efficient irrigation, eco-friendly pest control, and year-round fertilization to support
plant health and ecosystem vitality. Additional offerings include athletic turf maintenance, detailed
baseball field preparation, porter services, and parking lot sweeping to ensure a clean and professional
appearance. We focus on creating sustainable landscapes that thrive in all seasons.
Tree Care
Our certified arborists provide expert tree management, including trimming, removal, stump grinding,
and disease treatment. Utilizing advanced GIS tree mapping, we offer tailored growth and maintenance
programs for urban forests and individual trees alike. These services not only ensure the safety and health
of trees but also enhance their contribution to the environment and aesthetics of any property. By
integrating technology and expertise, we help preserve the natural canopy, ensuring long-term
sustainability for both urban and rural spaces.
Landscape Construction
We transform outdoor spaces into functional, visually stunning environments. From site preparation,
grading, and drainage to strategic planting and native plant rehabilitation, we focus on integrating
aesthetics with sustainability. Our portfolio includes durable parks, playgrounds, and athletic fields
designed for both community engagement and environmental balance.
• Tree Trimming & Pruning • On-site Diagnosis
• Hazardous Tree Removal • Long-term Tree Care
• Stump Grinding &
Disposal
• GIS Tree Mapping & Asset
Management
• Tree Disease & Pest
Treatment
• Tree Planting
• Turf Management • Irrigation Management
• Integrated Pest
Management
• Seasonal Planting &
Enhancements
• Athletic Turf Maintenance • Porter Services
• Parking Lot Sweeping
• Color Design
• Clean-up and Debris Removal
• Site Preparation & Grading
• Native Plant Restoration
• Playground Construction
• Irrigation Systems Installation
• Park Construction
• Tree, Shrub & Ground
Cover Planting
• Park Construction
• Athletic Field Construction
• Drainage System Setup
Page 274
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 8
Irrigation Retrofits
Modern irrigation systems are key to sustainable water management. Our retrofit solutions include
weather-responsive controllers, high-efficiency sprinklers, and precision drip irrigation systems. These
upgrades ensure optimized water use, reduced runoff, and compliance with regulatory requirements, all
while delivering significant cost savings. We also provide system performance monitoring and proactive
maintenance to maximize efficiency and extend system lifespan.
Drought-Tolerant Conversions
As water conservation becomes increasingly important, our drought-tolerant landscape conversions help
clients adapt effectively. By incorporating native plants, soil enhancements, drip irrigation, and functional
hardscape features like pathways and seating, we create sustainable, low-maintenance landscapes that
reduce water usage and improve environmental outcomes. These eco-friendly designs also enhance
property value and promote biodiversity, contributing to a greener community.
Hardscape Construction
Hardscapes play a vital role in enhancing landscape functionality and aesthetics. Our services include
custom concrete work, masonry, stonework, flagstone, and tile installations. We focus on integrating
these elements seamlessly into existing landscapes, ensuring durability and timeless appeal.
Complementing these are drainage systems, overhead structures, water features, and low-voltage
lighting, creating safe and inviting outdoor spaces with a unique visual appeal.
At Mariposa Landscapes, our commitment extends beyond delivering services; we aim to craft
environments that leave lasting impressions. From sustainable designs to innovative technologies, our
work reflects a blend of functionality, beauty, and environmental responsibility. With every project, we
strive to exceed expectations, creating landscapes that serve as vibrant spaces for communities to thrive.
• Custom Concrete Features
• Water Features
• Monuments
• Overhead Structures
Installation
• Masonry
• Stonework
• Low-voltage Lighting
• Drainage Systems
• Irrigation System Upgrades • Leak Detection & Repair
• Zone Adjustments • Drip Irrigation Installation
• Real-Time Monitoring
• System Performance
Assessments
• Compliance with Water
Regulations
• Plant Selection • Site Assessment & Analysis
• Soil Enhancement • Drip Irrigation Installation
• Mulching and Ground
Cover Application
• Hardscape Integration
• Water Conservation Design
Page 275
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 9
Featured Services: Tree Care
Mariposa Tree Management has earned accreditation from the Tree Care Industry
Association (TCIA), signifying excellence in safety, professionalism, and adherence to
industry best practices. We deliver comprehensive tree care solutions designed to maintain
the health, beauty, and safety of urban and natural landscapes.
Our team, including Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Workers, and ISA-qualified specialists
with extensive training in urban forestry management, stands out by combining expert tree care with
comprehensive consulting services, delivered by safety-focused professionals trained in advanced
arboriculture methods, techniques, and software, offering solutions such as urban forest planning, tree
evaluations, risk assessments, and pest management.
Full Suite of Tree Care Services
We provide a broad range of tree care services tailored to each client’s specific needs:
• Tree Trimming and Pruning: Following ANSI A300
standards, we ensure proper growth, structural
integrity, and aesthetic appeal.
• Tree Removal and Stump Grinding: Safe and
efficient removal of trees and stumps to clear
areas for new planting or construction.
• Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Our certified
arborists utilize advanced diagnostic techniques
to identify and treat tree diseases, ensuring long-
term health.
• Emergency Tree Services: Rapid response for
storm damage or hazardous conditions, prioritizing safety and restoration.
Tree Asset Management
Our proprietary tree asset management program leverages advanced GIS technology, providing detailed
inventories and actionable insights:
• Tree Plotter Software: Enables clients to access
tree inventories, work orders, and maintenance
records in real time.
• Customized Management Plans: Tailored
strategies for long-term tree health and risk
mitigation.
• Transparent Reporting: Comprehensive data for
informed decision-making and streamlined
operations.
Page 276
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 10
Featured Services: Irrigation Retrofits
Mariposa Landscapes specializes in modernizing outdated
irrigation systems to improve water efficiency, reduce
operational costs, and deliver rapid ROI. Through cutting-
edge technology like smart controllers, advanced weather
sensors, and cloud-based remote management, our solutions
optimize water usage and protect landscapes.
Our process begins with a system evaluation, including a
detailed water audit and GIS mapping of components,
ensuring a customized approach to address inefficiencies like
leaks, hardware limitations, and outdated programming.
Quantifiable Benefits
Water
Savings
Reduce water usage by 15-20%, saving $12,000–
$18,000 over five years depending on site.
Labor
Savings
Minimize technician visits from weekly to quarterly,
saving $4,000–$12,000 annually depending on site.
Quick ROI Achieve full system payback within a year for
immediate cost recovery.
Leak
Detection
Flow sensors identify and prevent costly water
waste, saving thousands annually.
Repair
Efficiency
Real-time alerts cut repair time by up to 50%,
reducing downtime and costs.
Plant
Health
Precision irrigation prevents overwatering, improving
plant health and reducing replacement or disease
costs.
Regulatory
Compliance
Ensure compliance with water conservation
standards to avoid penalties and fines.
Advanced Features and Benefits
• Smart Controllers: Automatically adjust daily watering schedules based on weather data,
plant types, and soil conditions. Our clients typically achieve 20–30% water savings, with
potential reductions of up to 50% in some cases.
• Weather Monitoring and Flow Sensors: Real-time data detects leaks or abnormal usage,
minimizing water loss and reducing repair costs.
• Remote Management: Cloud-based platforms allow property managers to monitor systems,
receive alerts, and make adjustments from any device, improving efficiency and reducing
labor costs.
• Precision Watering Solutions: Drip irrigation and high-efficiency sprinklers minimize runoff
and evaporation by delivering water directly to plant roots, enhancing plant health and
promoting sustainability.
Sustainable Impact
Our irrigation retrofits exceed water
conservation regulations while
supporting vibrant landscapes and
environmental goals. By leveraging
technology-driven solutions, we
empower clients to achieve
measurable savings, enhanced
system control, and sustainable
outcomes.
Mariposa Landscapes ensures your
irrigation system works smarter,
not harder—saving water, reducing
costs, and delivering reliable
performance year after year.
Page 277
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 11
Featured Services: Drought-Tolerant Conversions
Our team specializes in drought-tolerant conversions, transforming landscapes into sustainable, water-
efficient spaces that thrive in arid climates. Our expertise combines innovative techniques, tailored plant
selections, and eco-friendly practices, making us a leader in water-conscious landscaping solutions.
We provide end-to-end services to design and implement landscapes that balance functionality, beauty,
and sustainability:
Advanced Techniques and Eco-Friendly Practices
Mariposa integrates cutting-edge technology and sustainable practices into every
drought-tolerant project:
• Water-Saving Irrigation Controls: Installation of smart controllers that
adjust watering schedules based on real-time weather and soil data.
• Erosion Control and Drainage Systems: Preventing soil erosion and
promoting water retention for long-term stability.
• Native Plant Rehabilitation: Restoring local ecosystems with native plants
that support pollinators and reduce long-term upkeep.
Environmental and Economic Benefits
Our drought-tolerant conversions provide lasting value to clients and
communities. By reducing water usage, they comply with
conservation regulations and promote sustainability. Lower water
and maintenance needs cut operational costs, while modern designs
enhance property value with functionality and aesthetic appeal.
Our Drought-Tolerant Services
• Site Analysis: Evaluating soil, climate, and
infrastructure.
• Plant Selection: Installing native, water
efficient species.
• Drip Irrigation: Delivering water directly to
roots to minimize waste.
• Soil Enhancements: Improving retention
with amendments and mulch.
• Hardscaping: Adding pathways, seating, and
decorative stone for low-maintenance
appeal.
Mariposa Landscapes is a trusted partner in drought-tolerant conversions, with a portfolio of
successful projects across Southern California and Arizona. Our team’s certifications in irrigation design
and environmental planning ensure that every project meets the highest standards of sustainability
and performance.
Page 278
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 12
Quality Control Program
At Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., quality control is not just a process, it’s a philosophy. Rooted in the principle
of "Plan your work and work your plan," our Quality Control Program is designed to ensure every project
exceeds client expectations. We proactively manage quality and systematically address issues, we free up
our clients’ representatives - such as Public Works Inspectors or Property Managers - so they can focus on
higher priorities. This approach fosters a positive working relationship and ensures consistent, high-
quality results.
Key Components of the Quality Control Program
Our Quality Control Program is built on a foundation of structured processes and proactive management,
ensuring every aspect of our work meets the highest standards. The following components outline how
we maintain excellence at every stage of the project.
Quality Control Aspect How It Ensures Excellence
Work-in-Process
Inspections
Account Managers conduct initial and ongoing inspections of work tasks to
ensure compliance with quality standards. Non-conformances are logged and
addressed immediately.
Systematic Problem
Resolution
Issues are contained and corrected promptly, with solutions that include repair,
replacement, or rework. Completed work is re-inspected to prevent recurrence.
Management
Monitoring
Supervisors oversee operations to ensure adherence to quality plans, leveraging
structured problem-solving methods and enhanced process controls.
Client Feedback
Integration
Regular communication with clients ensures alignment on quality expectations
and facilitates continuous improvement.
Implementation Process
Core Objectives
• Consistency: Deliver uniform, high-quality results across all projects and service areas.
• Proactive Problem-Solving: Address potential issues early to prevent disruptions.
• Client Satisfaction: Build trust by meeting deadlines and maintaining transparency.
• Continuous Improvement: Refine processes based on feedback and data to enhance future
performance.
Monthly Work Plans
Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed
Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance
tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical
applications. This plan is reviewed and approved
during the monthly client meeting and correlates with
the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule
Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current
month’s performance.
Irrigation Reports
The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled
inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in
an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes
all service requests, emergency work, and repairs.
The Account Manager ensures these reports are
accurate and delivered to the client representative
on time.
1 2
Page 279
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 13
Advanced Tools and Technology
Our team leverages cutting-edge tools and technologies to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of
our Quality Control Program.
• Digital Inspection Checklists streamline the reporting process, allowing for real-time tracking and
immediate feedback on service performance. These checklists ensure that quality standards are
consistently upheld and any issues are promptly addressed.
• GIS Mapping Systems provide precise asset inventories, enabling accurate management of trees,
irrigation systems, and other landscape elements. By visualizing and analyzing these assets,
Mariposa ensures optimized resource allocation and improved service outcomes.
Our quality control philosophy focuses on preemptive action and systematic improvement, ensuring
issues are addressed efficiently and resolved through structured processes. This approach is exemplified
in our Sample Inspection Form and Inspection Action Items Form, which document inspections,
corrective actions, and follow-up measures to maintain the highest standards.
Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time. Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time. Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time.
Work Quality Evaluations
Communication is critical to aligning interpretations of
quality. Before regular meetings, the Mariposa
Supervisor and client representative independently
grade the landscape’s quality using a standard
evaluation form. Any discrepancies are addressed
during the meeting to ensure mutual understanding of
expectations.
Action Item Lists
During inspections or meetings, any requests,
concerns, or additional tasks are documented in an
Action Item List with a clear target completion
date. This approach ensures timely resolution,
fosters client confidence, and promotes
transparent communication by tracking progress
and accountability.
3 4
Page 280
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 14
Project with similar scope of work
Mariposa Landscapes has experience in doing similar scopes of services listed at the following locations:
1. City of Fontana (2020 – present)
Scope of Work:
Maintenance of the landscape include but not be limited to inspections,
mowing, trimming, shrub pruning, fertilization, aeration, weed control,
cultivation, pest control, de-thatching, plant replacements, renovation,
trail maintenance, trash removal, irrigation maintenance, and clean-up
of drainage facilities.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager: Roberto Perez
Account Manager: Edgar Garibay
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2020.
2. City of Chino Hills (2022 - present)
Scope of Work:
Maintenance of the landscape include but not be limited to inspections,
mowing, trimming, shrub pruning, fertilization, aeration, weed control,
pest control, de-thatching, renovation, irrigation maintenance, slope
maintenance, trash removal and clean-up of facilities.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager: Roberto Perez
Account Manager: Jesus Ramirez
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2022.
Page 281
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 15
3. City of Moreno Valley (2023 - present)
Scope of Work:
Maintenance of the landscape include but not be
limited to inspections, mowing, trimming, shrub
pruning, fertilization, aeration, weed control, pest
control, de-thatching, renovation, median and
parkways maintenance, irrigation maintenance and
trash removal.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager: Roberto Perez
Account Manager: Gustavo Suarez
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2023.
4. City of Tustin (2016 – present)
Scope of Work:
Maintenance of the landscape include but not be limited to
inspections, mowing, trimming, shrub pruning, fertilization,
aeration, weed control, pest control, de-thatching, renovation,
irrigation maintenance, and trash removal.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager: Michael Williams
Account Manager: Jose Sanabria
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2016.
Page 282
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 16
5. City of Oceanside (2021 – present)
Scope of Work:
Maintenance of the landscape include but not be limited to
inspections, mowing, trimming, shrub pruning, fertilization,
aeration, weed control, pest control, de-thatching,
renovation, irrigation maintenance, and trash removal.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager: Michael Williams
Account Manager: Douglas Lantz
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2021.
These are the 5 projects that Mariposa has been servicing with similar scope of work.
Our attached reference provides additional information, and additional information is available upon
request.
Page 283
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 17
Pending Litigation
The following table lists Mariposa's pending litigations. None of these litigations will affect our
performance for the city.
Page 284
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 18
3.5 Project Team
Corporate Organization and Experience
Mariposa Landscapes prides itself on a dynamic and experienced leadership team that drives operational
efficiency and client satisfaction. Our organizational structure ensures streamlined communication and
smooth project execution across all divisions, from operations to sales and maintenance. Below is our
detailed organizational chart, followed by individual profiles of key leadership members, each presented
in a concise and easy-to-reference format.
Leadership Profiles
The following profiles showcase the qualifications, credentials, and contributions of our key members,
highlighting the depth of knowledge and leadership that defines Mariposa Landscapes. These individuals
are not only industry experts but also the driving force behind our commitment to delivering exceptional
results for every project.
Terry Noriega – President
Experience & Credentials
Terry has over 45 years of experience in landscaping, spanning installation,
maintenance, and leadership. His relentless pursuit of knowledge and certification has
shaped Mariposa's corporate culture.
• B.S. in Ornamental Horticulture: California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona
• California Contractors Licenses: C-27, A, C61/D49, C-31
• Pest Control Advisor (6 Cat.) & Qualified Pest Control Applicator (7 Cat.)
• Certified Landscape Technician in Ornamental and Turf Maintenance
• ISA Certified Arborist (WE-1182A)
• Arizona Contractor’s License (ROC178088 K-21) and Pest Control Business License (8246)
Ongoing Training
• Member of the California Landscape Contractor’s Association
• Action Sales Training
Page 285
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 19
Antonio Valenzuela – VP Operations
Experience & Credentials
Antonio has over 30 years of experience in landscape maintenance and irrigation. Rising
from an Irrigation Technician to overseeing Mariposa’s operations, he ensures the
efficient execution of projects across all divisions. His expertise reinforces Mariposa’s
commitment to sustainability and operational excellence.
• Certified Landscape Technician in Ornamental and Turf Maintenance
• Pest Control Qualified Applicator (3 Categories)
• Certified Landscape Professional
• Backflow Certification – Los Angeles County
• Landscape Water Auditor – Cal Poly SLO
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Larry Rudd – VP Sales & Marketing
Experience & Credentials
With over 45 years of experience in landscape installation, maintenance, and estimating,
Larry has played a key role in Mariposa’s business development. From laborer to VP, he
has refined sales strategies and implemented profit-tracking systems that drive growth.
He also contributes to the industry as an educator and certified professional across
multiple disciplines.
• B.S. in Business Management – University of Phoenix
• Certified Landscape Technician – Hardscape Install, Softscape Install,
Ornamental & Turf Maintenance
• Water Efficient Landscaper (WaterSense Certified)
• Arizona Certified Landscape Professional
• American Green Zone Alliance – Electric Equipment Certification
• Red Cross CPR Safety Trained
Ongoing Training
• Associate Instructor – Cal Poly Pomona, Cal State Fullerton
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Luis Valenzuela – Landscape Division Manager
Experience & Credentials
Luis has over 25 years of experience in landscape and construction operations. Rising
through the ranks at Mariposa, he now manages the maintenance division, ensuring
high-quality service and operational efficiency. His expertise in irrigation, arboriculture,
and business leadership plays a key role in the company’s success.
• Qualified Applicator License – Category B
• Certified Landscape Technician – Irrigation
• ISA Certified Arborist (WE-8713A)
• Certification in Effective Business Leadership & Development – PDC/GCC
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Page 286
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 20
Dennis Jones – Tree Care Regional Divisional Manager
Experience & Credentials
With over 25 years in the landscape industry, Dennis specializes in arbor care and tree
asset management. He leads Mariposa’s tree division and GIS-based tree mapping
projects, ensuring safe and efficient urban forestry management.
• B.S. in Urban Forestry – Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
• ISA Certified Arborist (WE-5700AUM)
• ISA Certified Arborist - Utility Specialist
• ISA Certified Urban Forest Professional
• ISA (NOT SA) Tree Risk Assessment Qualification
• ISA Prescription Pruning Qualification
• EHAP (Electrical Hazards Awareness Program) Certified
• TCIA Certified Tree Safety Professional (843)
• Qualified Applicator License – Categories B, C & F
• Wildlife Protector Certification
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Alex Del Valle – Risk Control Manager
Experience & Credentials
Alex has over 13 years of experience in risk management and workplace safety. Since
joining Mariposa, he has implemented training programs that have significantly
improved safety metrics. His expertise ensures compliance and enhances overall
workplace security.
• OSHA 30 Certified
• Certified Forklift Instructor
• Certified AHA CPR and First Aid Trainer
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Rich Jensen – Project Manager, Landscape Construction
Experience & Credentials
With over 30 years of experience in public works, commercial, and residential
landscaping, Rich manages projects with a focus on safety, quality, and efficiency. He
ensures successful project execution while upholding the highest industry standards.
• Qualified Applicator License – Category B
• Certified Landscape Technician – Ornamental Maintenance, Turf Maintenance
• Certified Arborist (WE-10222A)
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
Page 287
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 21
Maintenance Division Organization & Experience
Mariposa Landscapes' Maintenance Division is led by a team of highly experienced professionals who
ensure that every project is executed with precision, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. Our
Area Managers bring decades of expertise in landscape maintenance, irrigation systems, and arbor care,
providing leadership that upholds the company’s reputation for excellence. Below are the profiles of our
key maintenance personnel.
Area Manager Profiles
Each leader brings a specialized skill set that enhances Mariposa’s ability to deliver exceptional
landscape maintenance solutions. Their deep industry knowledge, combined with continuous training
and certifications, ensures that our clients receive the highest quality service with a focus on
sustainability, water conservation, and operational excellence. The following profiles highlight the
experience and credentials of our key maintenance division leaders.
Tony Valenzuela – Area Manager Irwindale
Experience & Credentials
Tony has over 12 years’ experience in the landscape industry. As you can see from his
certifications and training, Tony is always striving to add to his knowledge. He
exemplifies Mariposa’s key differentiator, horticultural knowledge and expertise. This is
especially true when it comes to irrigation.
• Harvard Management Essentials Certified – Harvard Business School
• Qualified Applicator Certificate, Category B, C
• Pesticide IPM and Safety Schools Act trained
• Certified Landscape Technician, Exterior Maintenance
• Certified Landscape Manager, Exterior Maintenance
• EPA WaterSense – Qualified Water Efficient Landscape
• SDCWA San Diego – Recycled Water Site Supervisor Certified
• Irvine Ranch Water District Water Management Certified
• CIRT – Certified, Water Auditor, Installer & Repair Technician
Ongoing Training
• Constant on-going OSHA safety training
Page 288
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 22
Roberto Perez – Area Manager Fontana
Experience & Credentials
With over 25 years of experience, Roberto Perez is an expert in large-scale public works
landscape maintenance. His background as a public works inspector provides him with
valuable insight into regulatory compliance, quality control, and efficiency
improvements in municipal and commercial landscaping projects.
• Graduate of the Pacific Southwest Maintenance Management School
• MSAC Irrigation Design and Plant ID Certificate
• Leadership Academy Certificate, Cal Poly Pomona
• Calsense 3000 Certified
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA safety training
• Qualified Applicator License – In Process
• Cal State Fullerton Water Auditor – In Process
Michael Williams – Area Manager Santa Ana & San Diego
Experience & Credentials
Michael Williams brings over 45 years of experience in landscape management,
irrigation design, and arbor care. His in-depth expertise allows him to oversee complex
projects efficiently while ensuring high-quality service delivery. As a certified
professional, Michael ensures that all maintenance operations align with best practices
in water conservation and sustainability.
• B.S. in Ornamental Horticulture, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
• CPR Safety Trained
• Qualified Applicator License #133955
• San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) – Recycled Water Site Supervisor Certified
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA safety training
Alyssa Noriega – Area Manager Somis
Experience & Credentials
Alyssa Noriega has developed a deep understanding of landscape maintenance and
client relations. Since transitioning from the estimating department to operations, she
has excelled in customer service and project execution. She is currently pursuing her
Pest Control Advisor certification to further enhance her expertise.
• B.S. in Business Administration (Marketing & Management), University of La
Verne
• A.S. in Integrated Pest Management, Mt. San Antonio College
• Certified Qualified Water Efficient Landscaper
• Certified Level 1 - WeatherTRAK Basic Systems Training
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
• Pest Control Advisor – In Progress
Page 289
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 23
Craig Johnson – Area Manager Gardena
Experience & Credentials
Craig Johnson brings over 40 years of experience in HOA and commercial landscape
maintenance. His ability to manage large-scale operations with a customer-first
approach ensures that clients receive the highest level of service. His extensive irrigation
certifications enable him to implement cutting-edge water management solutions.
• Cal Poly Pomona – Ornamental Horticulture
• CPR Safety Trained
• Certified OSHA 8 & 10
• Certified in Basic WeatherTRAK System Introduction
• Certified in OptiFlow Installation and Programming
• WeatherTRAK Communication Training Completion
• Certified in OptiFlow Training – Level 2 OptiFlow Site Assessment
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA Safety Training
• Irrigation Certification Training - Ongoing
Page 290
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 24
Key Staffing for the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Roberto Perez – Area Manager Fontana
Experience & Credentials
With over 25 years of experience, Roberto Perez is an expert in large-scale
public works landscape maintenance. His background as a public works
inspector provides him with valuable insight into regulatory compliance,
quality control, and efficiency improvements in municipal and commercial
landscaping projects.
Robert has been with the company for about 3 years. Before that, he was with
various city within southern California, specializing in managing landscape
contracts.
Robert, has been managing similar works for many years. A more current
notable work includes with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Chino Hills, Fontana, Moreno Valley, San
Bernardino County, Riverside County, Etc.
• Graduate of the Pacific Southwest Maintenance Management School
• MSAC Irrigation Design and Plant ID Certificate
• Leadership Academy Certificate, Cal Poly Pomona
• Calsense 3000 Certified
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA safety training
• Qualified Applicator License – In Process
• Cal State Fullerton Water Auditor – In Process
Page 291
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 25
Dirk Bennet – Account Manager
Experience & Credentials
With over 11 years of experience, Dirk Bennett will be the person in-charge
and responsible for project management, communication with foreman, field
supervisor and primary contact with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He is
experience in conducting and overseeing Public Works, Commercial and
Residential landscape maintenance work. With a vast experience in all aspects
of Landscape maintenance
Dirk has been with the company for about 3.5 years.
Dirk has been managing the City of Rancho Cucamonga contract(s) for
Mariposa Landscapes. His extensive experience with scheduling and
understanding of the City's needs has proven him to be a reliable lead.
• Qualified Applicators License, Cat B, #145235
• Horticulture and Turf Grass Management certificate, Mt. San Jacinto
College.
• Safe Work Zone, trained.
• CPR and Safety trained.
• OSHA 10 Hour – Construction Safety
• Recycled Water Site Supervisor Certified, Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Ongoing Training
• Horticulture, arboriculture Turf Management certificate, Mt. San Jacinto College/ San Antonio
College.
• Integrated Pest Management continuation training.
• Weathertrack – Hydropoint controller management Company safety training
• Qualified Pesticide Applicators continuation training.
• Cal Sense controller management Company safety training
• Block flow prevention and maintenance training
Page 292
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 26
3.6 Staffing Level
Please see attached Schedule lV for estimated minimum labor hours.
The labor hours do not indicate the maximum labor that we will provide. We are anticipating providing
labor as necessary to get the work done.
Extra Work project will be assigned to additional staff and not from the proposed routine staff members.
3.7 Third Party/ Subcontractors
No subcontractor will be utilized for this contract.
Page 293
Schedule IV
Proposed Labor Hours by Month and Job ClassificationVendor: Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.
Project: Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance - Base Bid Locations Only
July August September October November December January February March April May June Total
1 Landscape Maintenance Laborer – Routine and Complex 1100 1100 1100 1100 800 800 800 800 1100 1100 1100 1100 12000
2 Landscape/Irrigation Laborer N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 Landscape/Irrigation Tender N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 48
5 TREE MAINTENANCE 20 N/A N/A N/A 20 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 80
6
7
8
9
10
1128 1100 1108 1100 828 820 808 800 1108 1100 1108 1120 12128
July August September October November December January February March April May June Total
1 Landscape Maintenance Laborer – Routine and Complex 1075 1075 1075 1075 781 781 781 781 1075 1075 1075 1075 11724
2 Landscape/Irrigation Laborer N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 Landscape/Irrigation Tender N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 48
5 TREE MAINTENANCE 20 N/A N/A N/A 20 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 80
6
7
8
9
10
1103 1075 1083 1075 809 801 789 781 1083 1075 1083 1095 11852
Directions: Enter the minimum labor hours for each job classification the vendor will provide per month, if a contract is awarded, to complete the routine services at the frequencies specified for each service level.
Additional job classifications may be added if needed.
Job Classification
Total:
Table 1
Proposed Labor Hours by Month and Job Classification - Service Level A
Table 2
Proposed Labor Hours by Month and Job Classification - Service Level B
Job Classification
Total:
Schedule V, Page 1 of 2 6/5/2025, 8:02 AM
Page 294
Schedule IV
Proposed Labor Hours by Month and Job ClassificationVendor: Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.
Project: Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance - Base Bid Locations Only
Directions: Enter the minimum labor hours for each job classification the vendor will provide per month, if a contract is awarded, to complete the routine services at the frequencies specified for each service level.
Additional job classifications may be added if needed.
July August September October November December January February March April May June Total
1 Landscape Maintenance Laborer – Routine and Complex 969 969 969 969 705 705 705 705 969 969 969 969 10572
2 Landscape/Irrigation Laborer N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 Landscape/Irrigation Tender N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 8 48
5 TREE MAINTENANCE 20 N/A N/A N/A 20 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 80
6
7
8
9
10
997 969 977 969 733 725 713 705 977 969 977 989 10700
July August September October November December January February March April May June Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Table 3
Proposed Labor Hours by Month and Job Classification - Service Level C
Job Classification
Total:
Job Classification
Total:
Schedule V, Page 2 of 2 6/5/2025, 8:02 AM
Page 295
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 29
3.8 Proposal Response
Mariposa Landscapes will deliver consistent, high-quality landscape maintenance across assigned
facilities, library, and trail-adjacent areas in Rancho Cucamonga. Our staffing plan and daily operations are
structured to meet all contractual requirements while providing additional value where needed.
Crew Deployment:
• Mowing Crew (4 personnel):
o Responsible for turf areas at all specified facilities, including libraries and fire stations.
o Equipped with two 72" mulching mowers to maintain weekly mowing cycles per service
level A and B requirements.
o Crew rotates across designated properties Monday through Friday to meet weekly
schedule requirements.
• Detail Crew (3 personnel):
o Handles planter maintenance, edging, trimming shrubs and groundcover, trash pickup,
and hardscape cleaning.
o Crew floats between properties daily based on rotation schedule and seasonal needs.
• Dedicated Dog Park Maintenance (1 personnel):
o Assigned personnel to Bark at Central Park.
o Responsible for daily service including trash can replacement, replenishing doggy waste
bags, and light cleaning.
Special Note on Bark at Central Park:
While the scope of services outlined in the RFP does not explicitly call for daily maintenance, we
understand the City's expectation for elevated service standards at the dog park. This area experiences
high public traffic and requires consistent upkeep to maintain health and safety standards.
We recognize the importance of this location and have allocated a full-time staff member for daily service
to:
• Change and dispose of trash bags.
• Restock and maintain doggy waste stations.
• Inspect and clean high-use areas to prevent odor and sanitation issues.
Page 296
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 30
Workplan and Approach
The schedule outlined below is subject to change and requires approval from the designated
representatives. Any adjustments will be made to align with operational requirements. At the
commencement of the contract, our Project Manager will submit the annual schedule, and a monthly
report will be provided at the start of each month for the representatives. Below are some of the key
services proposed, it is not limited to the following list of tasks that Mariposa is responsible for.
Weekly Average
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Weed Removal X X X X X
Litter Removal X X X X X
Irrigation System Inspection X X X X X
Turf Mowing, Edging, Trimming X X X X X
Disease, Herbicide, Pest Control x - - - -
Pruning, Trimming X X X X X
Fertilize Grass, Plants - - - - -
Mulching - - - - -
Yearly Average
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Weed Removal WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Litter Removal WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Irrigation System
Inspection WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Lawn Mowing,
Edging,
Trimming
WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Herbicide, Pest
Control
x x x x x x
Pruning MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO
Fertilize Turf x x x x
Mulching AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN
*AS = as needed *MO = monthly *WK = weekly *BI= Biweekly *DY = Daily *2X/DY = 2 times a day
Page 297
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 31
Tentative crew deployment plan for City of Rancho Cucamonga (Example)
Day Mowing Crew (4-man) Detail Crew (3-man) Dog Park
Maintenance (1-man)
Monday Lions Park, Windrows Park, Garcia Park Lions Park, Archibald
Library
Bark @ Central Park
(daily)
Tuesday Victoria Arbors, Ralph Lewis, Kenyon Family Resource Center,
Foothill Trailhead
Bark @ Central Park
(daily)
Wednesday Victoria Groves, Day Creek Park, Rancho
Summit
Metrolink, Fire Stations
171–172
Bark @ Central Park
(daily)
Thursday Milliken Park, Olive Grove, West
Greenway
Fire Stations 173–174, Fire
Stations 177–178
Bark @ Central Park
(daily)
Friday Etiwanda Creek, Coyote Canyon,
Vintage, Legacy, Fire Station 175–176 Fire Station 175–176 Bark @ Central Park
(daily)
Page 298
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 32
Project Specific Equipment
Mariposa Landscapes Inc. is proud to maintain a modern fleet, consisting of the latest models of vehicles
and equipment, including all the essential tools needed to fulfill our contract work. Our fleet is under five
years old and is meticulously maintained by our in-house mechanics. Notably, we offer large-capacity
mowing equipment, a unique advantage that sets us apart from most competitors.
To ensure reliable service, we employ a full team of skilled mechanics, and we maintain an extensive
inventory of backup equipment, which allows us to consistently adhere to our project schedules.
Each of our crew trucks is fully equipped with all necessary hand tools for landscape maintenance, along
with a First Aid kit, water, and clear instructions in the event of an accident. Our mechanics are
strategically stationed within 30 to 60 minutes of each project site, ensuring rapid response times. In
addition, we have backup equipment available for deployment within one hour, further reinforcing our
ability to maintain schedule continuity.
We are confident that the equipment detailed in our proposal will provide comprehensive coverage and
surpass the city’s established standards. Our commitment to excellence is demonstrated through our
meticulous selection of resources and skilled personnel. Mariposa Landscape Inc. is dedicated to ensuring
that every aspect of our work exemplifies the highest quality, reflecting both our expertise and our
commitment to delivering superior results. We believe that our approach will not only meet but exceed
the expectations set forth, showcasing our dedication to excellence and reinforcing our reputation for
exceptional service.
Anticipated Equipment
Regular Vehicles Periodic Vehicles
QTY Vehicles QTY Vehicles
1
2
1
Truck Toyota Tacoma w/Irrigation Setup
Truck Chevy 2500HD, Dbl Cab, Landscape body
Truck Toyota Tacoma w/Supervisor Setup
1
Truck Chevy 3500HD, Single Cab, Spray
Truck
Regular Equipment Periodic Equipment
QTY Equipment QTY Equipment
1
3
3
3
2
1
3
Trailer 82” x 16”, GVWR 7000, Mow Crew
Trimmer String (Weedeater)
Blower backpack
Hedge Trimmer 51” Long Staff
Mower 72in, Recycler
Edger Stick Type
Truck and Tools Equipment
1
1
1
Tractor Kubota PTO HP-40
Trailer Flat Bed, 9999 GVWR Big Mower
Pressure Washer 185gal w/ trailer
Page 299
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 33
Extra Work Pricing
When a customer desires additional work or an emergency arises where work above and beyond the
contract scope becomes necessary, there must be some mechanism to quickly communicate and agree
upon the cost. Many times, situations arise where it is difficult to come up with a cost ahead of time. We
solve that issue with the following:
Our process is designed to ensure
clarity and professionalism, founded
on the principles of Simplicity,
Transparency, Honesty, and No
Surprises.
If an issue arises that alters the scope
of the original estimate, we will
revise the proposal accordingly and
resubmit it for client approval. The
updated proposal will include clear
explanations and supporting
documentation, such as photos.
Work will not proceed until the client
has reviewed and approved the
revised scope and associated costs,
ensuring full agreement before
moving forward.
4-Step Pricing Process
1. The scope of work is identified, and a "Not-to-Exceed" proposal is prepared.
2. The customer reviews and approves the proposal.
3. Work proceeds, with labor tracked and receipts documented.
4. Billing will never exceed the original proposal and will be either equal to or less than
the proposed amount.
The sample proposal to the right
pertains to an irrigation-related
project, where multiple valves
require replacement due to damage
sustained in an auto accident.
Page 300
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 34
Continual Employee Training
The Certified Landscape Technician Test is widely regarded as one of the most challenging exams across
any industry. It is a timed, hands-on field test that covers a wide range of skills and disciplines essential
for landscape work. Three certifications can be earned through this test: Certified Landscape Technician
in Landscape, Maintenance, and Irrigation. Each category has its own specific modules, but all candidates
must pass a core set of 13 modules. Employees at Mariposa not only maintain their current CLT skills but
are also continuously working to expand their knowledge and pursue further certifications.
Core Elements
1.02 - First Aid and Safety
1.03 - Plan Reading
1.05 - Plant Identification
1.06 - Sod Installation
1.07 - Work Orders and Reports
1.08 - Program Controller
1.09 - Irrigation Identification
1.10 - Lateral Repair and Head Adjustment
1.11 - Truck & Trailer
1.12 - Tree Planting and Staking/Guying
1.14 - Chainsaw
Landscape Maintenance Elements
3.01 - Written General Comprehension
3.02 - Pruning
3.03 - 21” Mower
3.04 – Intermediate Walk-Behind Mower
3.05 - Aerator
3.06 - Edger & Trimmer
3.07 - Riding Mower
3.08 - Pesticides
3.09 - Fertilizer
3.10 - Power Blower
1.14 - Chainsaw
Irrigation Elements
4.01 - Irrigation General Comprehension
4.02 - Irrigation Plan Reading
4.03 - Lateral Installation
4.04 - Mainline Installation
4.05 - Valve Repair
4.06 - Valve Wiring
4.07 - Pipe Installation Equipment
1.14 - Chainsaw
Page 301
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 35
Safety
Employee safety is our highest priority. At Mariposa Landscapes, we have implemented thorough and
continuous safety training for all our employees. We have specially designed intensive training programs
for new and onboarding employees that include both on-site training and classroom sessions.
Furthermore, all employees are required to participate in ongoing training sessions to prevent accidents,
ensure the safe handling of equipment, and develop their judgment in anticipating hazards before they
occur. Additionally, on new sites or sites new to the employees, a supervisor conducts site -specific risk
prevention training focusing on the most frequent hazards and risks known to the site and region.
Employee Training & Supervision
Our safety program is built on thorough employee training
and supervision, with the main objective to ensure a safe
work environment through well-prepared personnel.
Training begins within the first 3 days of employment,
following a structured agenda that covers orientation,
safety basics, equipment and chemical safety, and
practical training and review. This initial training covers
the use of equipment, chemicals, supplys, and protective
gear. To maintain high safety standards, ongoing training
is provided weekly and bi-monthly, ensuring all employees
stay up-to-date with the latest safety protocols.
Training in the Use of Supplies, Chemicals and Equipment
We divide this training session into the following modules:
Supplies & Chemicals Equipment
Safety Basics All exposed employees receive
training on chemical safety
fundamentals, including hazard
identification, labeling systems,
proper storage, and interpreting
Safety Data Sheets to understand
chemical properties and risks.
Familiarization This training covers the proper use
of equipment, including chainsaws,
hedge trimmers, edgers, blowers,
mowers, and trailers, with an
overview of each machine's
functions, common uses, and
associated risks.
Safe Handling Comprehensive guidelines are
established for safely handling
herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers,
and cleaning agents. Employees are
trained on safe mixing, application,
storage, correct application rates,
and the importance of proper
ventilation.
Operational
Safety
This session covers the safe
operation of equipment, including
start-up, shutdown, proper use,
and safety checks. It focuses on
recognizing and avoiding hazards
like chainsaw kickback, trimmer
debris, and mower rollover risks.
Emergency Training includes protocols for spills,
leaks and exposure incidents so
employees can act quickly and
mitigate risks in a timely manner.
Maintenance &
Inspection
In this module we cover instruction
on routine and maintenance tasks,
such as sharpening blades,
changing oil and inspecting and
recognizing wear and tear.
Figure 2: Training on the Use of Supplies, Chemicals and Equipment
Figure 1: Employee Training Held On-site
Page 302
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 36
All of our training and safety sessions are led by our highly qualified supervisors or safety coordinators
who have been previously trained in safe and correct operating procedures and are determined by
competent management. All trainers have undergone certification from recognized agencies such as the
California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the American Heart Association. Trainers are selected
based on their expertise and ability to communicate effectively.
Figure 3: Mandatory PPE for our Staff
Protective Equipment
Our PPE program includes detailed instructions on the types of protective
equipment required for various tasks, as well as proper usage techniques and
maintenance procedures to ensure equipment stays effective. We follow strict
internal protective equipment protocols and conduct regular unannounced site
inspection to verify that all PPE is in good condition and worn properly. All
employees must wear PPE listed in Figure 3. Workers wear appropriate PPEs as
needed, where job safety requires it.
Ongoing Training
Ongoing and continuous training are of great importance to our company. We
hold weekly meetings designed to keep employees updated on specific
seasonal hazards (for instance, when we have noticed an increase in snake
sightings), new equipment, site-specific risks or updated safety practices
regarding chemicals or equipment used. Our supervisors hold regular
evaluations to reinforce safety protocols and accident prevention but also to
improve performance.
Aside from our weekly meetings, we hold bi-monthly long-format sessions which last from 2-3 hours and provide
insights, feedback and learnings from new job sites and new site challenges. In these sessions, new materials and
chemicals are being discussed and introduced to the team. Equipment training courses are often held separately
or in smaller groups. Supervisors and trainers conduct daily inspections to identify and reduce potential hazards,
ensuring compliance with safety procedures. Their checklists
cover proper PPE usage and protocols, equipment condition,
chemical storage, and work zone setup. All findings and
learnings are then discussed in our bi-monthly meeting and
focus on areas where improvements can be made. Employees
are encouraged to provide feedback on safety practices,
helping to identify new hazards and refine training programs.
Figure 4: On-site Evaluation and Feedback Session or Our
Team
Page 303
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 37
Green Initiative
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. is dedicated to implementing environmentally sustainable practices and energy
conservation measures. We operate a comprehensive recycling program for green waste and paper
products, which is enforced at both our local offices and all job sites.
Our company currently uses hybrid vehicles and is actively researching and pursuing the adoption of
hybrid equipment for use on our contracts. We are committed to being as environmentally responsible as
possible and are continuously expanding our operations to meet this goal.
Mariposa Landscapes has earned certification from the American Green Zone Alliance under the
Sustainable Land Care Certification (Electric Equipment). This certification ensures we are at the forefront
of industry advancements, selecting cost-effective solutions with the latest commercial-grade electric
small equipment.
We collaborate closely with clients to optimize water usage wherever possible. With hundreds of ET
“Smart” Controller installations over the years, we are proficient in assessing properties for water-saving
opportunities, providing tailored solutions, and programming these advanced irrigation devices for
maximum efficiency.
Beyond these initiatives, we remain committed to leading the industry in minimizing environmental
impact and advancing sustainable practices.
The key points of its strategy to achieve this are:
• Minimize waste by evaluating operations and ensuring they are as efficient as possible.
• Minimize toxic emissions through the selection and use of its fleet and equipment.
• Actively promote recycling both internally and amongst its customers and suppliers.
• Meet or exceed all the environmental legislation that relates to the Company.
• Adhere to all local codes and ordinances regarding water conservation.
Page 304
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 38
Integrated Pest Management Program
Integrated pest management (IPM) is an
ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on
long-term prevention of pests or their
damage through a combination of
techniques such as biological control,
habitat manipulation, modification of
cultural practices, and use of resistant
varieties. Pesticides are used only after
monitoring indicates they are needed
according to established guidelines, and
treatments are made with the goal of
removing only the target organism. Pest
control materials are selected and applied in
a manner that minimizes risks to human
health, beneficial and non-target organisms,
and the environment.
Biological Control Biological control is the use of natural enemies—predators,
parasites, pathogens, and competitors—to control pests and their
damage. Though Mariposa does not introduce any beneficial
organisms into the environment, we do identify and encourage
their presence.
Cultural Controls Cultural controls are practices that reduce pest establishment,
reproduction, dispersal, and survival. For example, changing
irrigation practices can reduce pest problems, since too much
water can increase root disease and weeds.
Mechanical & Physical
Controls
Mechanical and physical controls kill a pest directly or make the
environment unsuitable for it. Traps for rodents are examples of
mechanical control. Physical controls include mulches for weed
management, steam sterilization of the soil for disease
management, or barriers such as screens to keep birds or insects
out.
Chemical Controls Chemical control is the use of pesticides. Mariposa Landscapes
uses pesticides only when needed and in combination with other
approaches for more effective, long-term control. Also, pesticides
are selected and applied in a way that minimizes their possible
harm to people and the environment. With IPM we use the most
selective pesticide that will do the job and be the safest for other
organisms and for air, soil, and water quality.
Step 2
Prevention
Step 3
Observation
Step 4
Intervention
Step 5
Evaluation
& Planning
Step 1
Knowledge
Page 305
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 39
1
2
3
4
5
Job Start Up
Contract Execution and Official Notice to Proceed
For new contracts, we need a signed commitment before purchasing trucks and equipment. Startups
within 30 days may face supply chain delays, so we prefer a 60 to 90-day lead time. During this period, we
may have meetings with the client to introduce the team and review the schedule. We also use this time
to prepare area maps, take measurements, and order necessary materials like fertilizer, weed control
products, and other supplies.
Job Start
On the first day of the project, our crews will be equipped with detailed maps, task lists, and an initial
schedule. Our management team is actively involved in logistics at this stage. We also conduct a thorough
inspection of the irrigation systems with our technicians. If any issues, such as broken or inoperative
components, are identified, we will create a detailed list of required repairs, including pricing and a
completion schedule for the customer.
30-Day Evaluation
At the 30-day mark, we will hold a special evaluation meeting with the customer. This meeting addresses
aspects of the project that may not have been fully outlined in the scope or specifications, such as
customized timelines, work sequences, and specific site needs. We will review the progress so far, identify
successes, and discuss any areas requiring adjustment. The customer will receive an action plan with clear
timelines for any necessary changes, along with an updated irrigation system inspection.
60-Day Evaluation
By the 60-day point, we expect operations to be running smoothly and in line with expectations. We will
conduct a customer survey to assess their experience with the proposal process, the transition to
operations, and overall job performance. Our goal is to achieve the highest satisfaction score possible and
ensure complete customer satisfaction.
90-Day Evaluation
At the 90-day mark, the customer will receive a survey with a single question: "Would you recommend
Mariposa Landscapes to other customers right now?" Our goal is to receive an enthusiastic “Yes”
response, confirming their satisfaction and confidence in our services.
Notice to
Proceed Job Start
30-Day
Evaluation 60-Day
Evaluation
90-Day
Evaluation
Page 306
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Non-Construction Procurement
Bid Results for Project Request for Proposal for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance (RFP #25/26-006)
Issued on 05/01/2025
Bid Due on June 05, 2025 9:00 AM (PDT)
Exported on 06/05/2025
Line Totals (Unit Price * Quantity)
Item NumSection Item Code Description Reference Unit of Measure Quantity Greenfield Management BrightVIew Landscape Services Stay Green Inc Mariposa Landscapes Inc.Colts Landscape JAS Landscape LLC New Generation Landscape Management Inc.US Landscape Inc
1 Archibald Library - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $433.08 $612.30 $593.80 $1,100.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
2 Archibald Library - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $433.08 $306.15 $593.80 $1,195.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
3 Archibald Library - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $1,104.80 $4,789.31 $4,286.62 $6,534.89 $9,805.10 $13,119.50 $97,983,607.20 $165,720,000.00
4 Archibald Library - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $1,039.56 $918.45 $1,425.12 $1,100.00 $1,200.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $3,029.80 $6,695.03 $6,123.52 $9,147.61 $13,200.10 $19,569.50 $98,004,892.56 $165,720,000.00
5 Archibald Library - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $423.96 $428.61 $581.20 $1,045.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
6 Archibald Library - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $423.96 $214.31 $581.20 $1,135.25 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
7 Archibald Library - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $1,104.80 $4,671.92 $3,000.91 $6,385.74 $9,314.85 $15,191.00 $69,367,077.60 $165,720,000.00
8 Archibald Library - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,017.48 $642.92 $1,394.89 $1,045.00 $1,200.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
Subtotal $2,939.80 $6,537.32 $4,286.75 $8,943.04 $12,540.10 $21,641.00 $69,382,146.48 $165,720,002.00
9 Archibald Library - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $412.68 $306.15 $548.82 $992.75 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
10 Archibald Library - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $412.68 $153.08 $548.82 $1,078.48 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
11 Archibald Library - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $1,104.80 $4,357.06 $2,143.31 $6,037.73 $8,849.45 $17,262.50 $39,192,780.00 $165,720,000.00
12 Archibald Library - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $990.36 $459.23 $1,317.16 $992.75 $1,200.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $2,939.80 $6,172.78 $3,061.77 $8,452.52 $11,913.43 $23,712.50 $39,201,294.00 $165,720,000.00
13 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,212.08 $2,449.20 $3,517.59 $1,100.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
14 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $75.00 $1,836.12 $1,224.60 $3,517.59 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
15 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $8,712.00 $34,238.16 $7,350.75 $38,703.06 $6,860.70 $21,780.00 $772,658,568.00 $1,089,000,000.00
16 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $1,784.00 $9,018.12 $9,796.39 $1,460.65 $7,782.70 $3,345.00 $158,221,176.00 $468,300,000.00
17 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $3,285.96 $3,673.80 $4,924.62 $3,500.00 $950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
18 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,285.96 $20,410.00 $4,663.22 $1,257.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $11,936.00 $53,876.40 $44,904.74 $56,786.72 $21,600.40 $33,005.00 $930,908,124.48 $1,557,300,000.00
19 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,165.16 $1,714.44 $3,517.59 $1,045.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
20 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $1,797.24 $857.22 $3,517.59 $1,045.00 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
21 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $8,712.00 $33,454.08 $6,860.70 $38,703.06 $6,523.11 $27,225.00 $547,000,344.00 $1,089,000,000.00
22 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $1,784.00 $7,011.12 $5,142.38 $1,460.65 $7,394.68 $3,902.50 $112,012,008.00 $468,300,000.00
23 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $3,216.24 $2,571.66 $4,924.62 $3,325.00 $950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
24 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,216.24 $20,410.00 $4,577.54 $1,194.15 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $12,631.00 $50,860.08 $37,556.40 $56,701.04 $20,526.94 $39,007.50 $659,032,443.84 $1,557,300,000.00
25 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,107.56 $1,224.60 $3,517.59 $992.75 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
26 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $1,749.36 $612.30 $3,517.59 $992.75 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
27 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $8,712.00 $31,232.52 $4,900.50 $38,703.06 $6,196.41 $32,670.00 $309,058,200.00 $1,089,000,000.00
28 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $1,784.00 $7,225.20 $3,672.81 $1,242.11 $7,024.50 $4,460.00 $63,287,400.00 $468,300,000.00
29 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $3,130.56 $1,836.90 $4,924.62 $3,158.75 $950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
30 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,130.56 $20,410.00 $4,298.13 $1,134.44 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $12,436.00 $48,575.76 $32,657.11 $56,203.09 $19,499.60 $45,010.00 $372,356,952.00 $1,557,300,000.00
31 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,314.36 $3,061.50 $1,801.91 $1,200.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
32 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $1,971.60 $1,530.75 $2,702.87 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
33 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $8,416.00 $33,074.88 $21,429.24 $45,057.16 $72,588.00 $10,520.00 $746,406,624.00 $1,052,000,000.00
34 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $200.00 $3,285.96 $4,592.25 $4,504.78 $1,360.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
35 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $6,571.80 $20,410.00 $9,009.56 $1,602.00 $1,690.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
36 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,285.96 $16,238.00 $4,504.78 $1,550.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
37 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,857.76 $15,307.50 $13,514.35 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $11,366.00 $59,362.32 $82,569.24 $81,095.41 $90,000.00 $21,970.00 $746,449,194.72 $1,052,000,000.00
38 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,290.24 $1,714.44 $1,768.80 $1,140.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
39 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $685.00 $1,935.36 $857.22 $2,653.21 $1,140.00 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
40 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $8,416.00 $32,443.68 $12,003.32 $44,299.72 $68,958.60 $15,780.00 $528,415,392.00 $1,052,000,000.00
41 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $3,225.60 $2,571.66 $4,422.01 $1,292.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
42 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $795.00 $6,451.08 $20,410.00 $8,844.02 $1,521.90 $1,690.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
43 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,225.60 $16,328.00 $4,422.01 $1,472.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
44 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,676.68 $15,307.50 $13,266.03 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $11,346.00 $58,248.24 $69,192.14 $79,675.80 $86,024.50 $27,230.00 $528,445,529.76 $1,052,000,000.00
45 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,248.84 $1,530.75 $1,660.84 $1,083.00 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
46 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $650.00 $1,873.20 $765.38 $2,491.26 $1,083.00 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
47 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $8,416.00 $31,307.52 $10,719.88 $41,459.32 $65,508.04 $18,410.00 $298,557,600.00 $1,052,000,000.00
48 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $3,122.04 $2,296.13 $4,152.10 $1,227.40 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
49 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $685.00 $6,243.96 $20,410.00 $8,304.20 $1,445.80 $1,690.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
50 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,134.64 $16,328.00 $4,152.10 $1,398.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
51 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,365.88 $15,307.50 $12,456.30 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $11,301.00 $56,296.08 $67,357.64 $74,676.13 $82,245.24 $29,860.00 $298,574,628.00 $1,052,000,000.00
52 Lions Park - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $711.36 $1,224.60 $975.27 $899.74 $2,340.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
53 Lions Park - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $625.00 $711.36 $612.30 $975.27 $1,538.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
54 Lions Park - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $1,946.40 $18,189.11 $3,673.83 $23,887.19 $6,982.71 $3,649.50 $172,624,269.60 $535,260,000.00
55 Lions Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $2,013.90 $6,400.85 $5,716.12 $8,757.11 $9,062.55 $16,782.50 $238,147,702.80 $1,040,515,000.00
56 Lions Park - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $1,422.84 $1,836.90 $1,950.54 $3,750.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
57 Lions Park - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $2,134.20 $16,328.00 $2,925.81 $1,767.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
58 Lions Park - Service Level A Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,019.72 $14,695.20 $13,514.35 $0.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $6,105.30 $31,589.43 $44,086.95 $52,985.55 $24,000.00 $30,282.00 $410,807,448.00 $1,575,775,000.00
59 Lions Park - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $698.28 $857.22 $957.28 $854.75 $2,340.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
60 Lions Park - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $780.00 $698.28 $428.61 $957.28 $1,461.00 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
61 Lions Park - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $1,946.40 $17,897.15 $3,428.10 $23,466.29 $6,634.79 $4,257.75 $122,208,616.80 $535,260,000.00
62 Lions Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $2,685.20 $6,320.29 $3,000.71 $8,636.27 $8,609.42 $20,139.00 $168,595,652.40 $1,040,515,000.00
63 Lions Park - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $1,396.56 $1,285.83 $1,914.55 $3,562.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
64 Lions Park - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $2,094.84 $16,328.00 $2,871.83 $1,678.65 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
65 Lions Park - Service Level B Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,019.72 $14,695.20 $13,266.03 $0.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $7,011.60 $31,125.12 $40,023.67 $52,069.53 $22,801.11 $34,246.75 $290,829,384.00 $1,575,775,000.00
66 Lions Park - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $662.40 $612.30 $880.98 $812.01 $2,340.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
67 Lions Park - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $662.40 $306.15 $880.98 $1,387.95 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
68 Lions Park - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $1,946.40 $16,933.68 $2,450.03 $21,578.28 $6,303.90 $4,866.00 $2,836.88 $535,260,000.00
69 Lions Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $2,685.20 $5,957.79 $2,141.45 $7,911.27 $8,179.79 $21,817.25 $2,836.24 $1,040,515,000.00
70 Lions Park - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $1,324.80 $918.45 $1,761.97 $3,384.37 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
71 Lions Park - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $1,987.20 $16,328.00 $2,642.95 $1,594.71 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
72 Lions Park - Service Level C Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,082.00 $14,695.20 $12,456.30 $0.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $6,916.60 $29,610.27 $37,451.58 $48,112.73 $21,662.73 $36,533.25 $19,863.12 $1,575,775,000.00
73 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $225.24 $612.30 $584.80 $1,419.36 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
74 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $220.32 $306.15 $584.80 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
75 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $1,068.80 $4,631.91 $4,285.89 $6,442.19 $5,330.64 $2,004.00 $94,790,803.20 $173,680,000.00
76 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $1,560.96 $918.45 $1,403.53 $1,650.00 $900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $2,943.80 $6,638.43 $6,122.79 $9,015.32 $9,600.00 $5,904.00 $94,812,088.56 $173,680,000.00
77 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $220.44 $428.61 $573.11 $1,348.39 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
78 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $215.64 $214.31 $573.11 $1,140.00 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
79 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $1,068.80 $4,519.69 $3,000.66 $6,297.90 $5,064.78 $2,338.00 $67,106,745.60 $173,680,000.00
80 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,527.84 $642.92 $1,375.46 $1,567.50 $900.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $2,903.80 $6,483.61 $4,286.50 $8,819.57 $9,120.67 $6,238.00 $67,121,814.48 $173,680,000.00
81 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $214.56 $306.15 $528.12 $1,280.97 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
82 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $209.88 $153.08 $528.12 $1,083.00 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
83 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $1,068.80 $4,216.42 $2,142.94 $5,818.28 $4,810.94 $2,672.00 $37,915,680.00 $173,680,000.00
84 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $1,487.16 $459.23 $1,267.49 $1,488.69 $900.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $2,968.80 $6,128.02 $3,061.40 $8,142.02 $8,663.60 $6,572.00 $37,924,194.00 $173,680,000.00
85 Ellena Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $13,615.04 $8,356.23 $18,363.29 $11,147.31 $14,500.02 $25,528.20 $1,207,504,282.56 $2,654,932,800.00
Subtotal $13,615.04 $8,356.23 $18,363.29 $11,147.31 $14,500.02 $25,528.20 $1,207,504,282.56 $2,654,932,800.00
86 Ellena Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $13,615.04 $8,356.23 $18,363.29 $11,147.31 $13,768.21 $29,782.90 $854,847,516.48 $2,654,932,800.00
Subtotal $13,615.04 $8,356.23 $18,363.29 $11,147.31 $13,768.21 $29,782.90 $854,847,516.48 $2,654,932,800.00
87 Ellena Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $13,615.04 $6,518.20 $2,144.37 $8,322.19 $13,087.46 $34,037.60 $482,993,544.00 $2,654,932,800.00
Subtotal $13,615.04 $6,518.20 $2,144.37 $8,322.19 $13,087.46 $34,037.60 $482,993,544.00 $2,654,932,800.00
88 Kenyon Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $17,265.12 $10,618.05 $18,365.77 $14,135.82 $18,387.35 $32,372.10 $1,531,226,227.68 $4,402,605,600.00
Subtotal $17,265.12 $10,618.05 $18,365.77 $14,135.82 $18,387.35 $32,372.10 $1,531,226,227.68 $4,402,605,600.00
89 Kenyon Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $17,265.12 $10,618.05 $18,365.77 $14,135.82 $17,459.35 $37,767.45 $1,084,025,089.44 $4,402,605,600.00
Subtotal $17,265.12 $10,618.05 $18,365.77 $14,135.82 $17,459.35 $37,767.45 $1,084,025,089.44 $4,402,605,600.00
90 Kenyon Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $17,265.12 $8,265.68 $18,365.77 $12,020.84 $16,596.10 $43,162.80 $612,480,132.00 $4,402,605,600.00
Subtotal $17,265.12 $8,265.68 $18,365.77 $12,020.84 $16,596.10 $43,162.80 $612,480,132.00 $4,402,605,600.00
91 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $17,535.76 $10,784.49 $14,291.64 $14,357.40 $18,675.58 $32,879.55 $622,081,086.00 $4,734,655,200.00
Subtotal $17,535.76 $10,784.49 $14,291.64 $14,357.40 $18,675.58 $32,879.55 $622,081,086.00 $4,734,655,200.00
92 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $17,535.76 $10,784.49 $14,291.64 $14,357.40 $17,733.04 $38,359.48 $1,101,017,763.12 $4,734,655,200.00
Subtotal $17,535.76 $10,784.49 $14,291.64 $14,357.40 $17,733.04 $38,359.48 $1,101,017,763.12 $4,734,655,200.00
93 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $17,535.76 $8,395.25 $14,291.64 $12,209.27 $16,856.25 $43,839.40 $622,081,086.00 $4,734,655,200.00
Subtotal $17,535.76 $8,395.25 $14,291.64 $12,209.27 $16,856.25 $43,839.40 $622,081,086.00 $4,734,655,200.00
94 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $15,470.24 $9,514.20 $12,240.83 $12,666.26 $16,475.81 $29,006.70 $1,372,040,115.36 $4,176,964,800.00
Subtotal $15,470.24 $9,514.20 $12,240.83 $12,666.26 $16,475.81 $29,006.70 $1,372,040,115.36 $4,176,964,800.00
95 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $15,470.24 $9,514.20 $12,240.83 $12,666.26 $15,644.28 $33,841.15 $971,329,958.88 $4,176,964,800.00
Subtotal $15,470.24 $9,514.20 $12,240.83 $12,666.26 $15,644.28 $33,841.15 $971,329,958.88 $4,176,964,800.00
96 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $15,470.24 $7,406.38 $12,240.83 $10,771.15 $14,870.77 $38,675.60 $548,806,764.00 $4,176,964,800.00
Subtotal $15,470.24 $7,406.38 $12,240.83 $10,771.15 $14,870.77 $38,675.60 $548,806,764.00 $4,176,964,800.00
97 Vintage Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $18,500.00 $11,377.50 $14,291.25 $15,146.88 $19,702.50 $34,687.50 $1,640,746,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
Subtotal $18,500.00 $11,377.50 $14,291.25 $15,146.88 $19,702.50 $34,687.50 $1,640,746,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
98 Vintage Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $18,500.00 $11,377.50 $14,291.25 $15,146.88 $18,708.13 $40,468.75 $1,161,559,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
Subtotal $18,500.00 $11,377.50 $14,291.25 $15,146.88 $18,708.13 $40,468.75 $1,161,559,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
99 Vintage Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $18,500.00 $8,856.88 $14,291.25 $12,880.63 $17,783.13 $46,250.00 $656,287,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
Subtotal $18,500.00 $8,856.88 $14,291.25 $12,880.63 $17,783.13 $46,250.00 $656,287,500.00 $4,995,000,000.00
100 Windrows Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $22,086.24 $13,583.04 $18,359.19 $18,083.11 $23,521.85 $41,411.70 $1,958,806,539.36 $7,288,459,200.00
Subtotal $22,086.24 $13,583.04 $18,359.19 $18,083.11 $23,521.85 $41,411.70 $1,958,806,539.36 $7,288,459,200.00
101 Windrows Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $22,086.24 $13,583.04 $18,359.19 $18,083.11 $22,334.71 $48,313.65 $1,386,728,750.88 $7,288,459,200.00
Subtotal $22,086.24 $13,583.04 $18,359.19 $18,083.11 $22,334.71 $48,313.65 $1,386,728,750.88 $7,288,459,200.00
102 Windrows Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $22,086.24 $10,573.79 $18,359.19 $15,377.54 $21,230.40 $55,215.60 $783,509,364.00 $7,288,459,200.00
Subtotal $22,086.24 $10,573.79 $18,359.19 $15,377.54 $21,230.40 $55,215.60 $783,509,364.00 $7,288,459,200.00
103 Metrolink - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,488.36 $2,449.20 $2,040.51 $5,200.00 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
104 Metrolink - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $1,488.36 $1,224.60 $2,040.51 $3,950.00 $1,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
105 Metrolink - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $3,812.00 $17,039.64 $14,695.26 $28,971.20 $32,878.50 $7,147.50 $338,082,468.00 $2,172,840,000.00
106 Metrolink - Service Level A Irrigation Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $3,850.00 $5,060.64 $3,673.80 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
107 Metrolink - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $2,976.84 $3,673.80 $4,081.02 $9,500.00 $900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
108 Metrolink - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $1,786.08 $16,328.00 $2,448.61 $8,472.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $10,012.00 $29,839.92 $42,044.66 $40,781.86 $72,000.50 $16,127.50 $338,117,943.60 $2,172,840,000.00
109 Metrolink - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,655.76 $1,714.44 $2,269.94 $4,940.00 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
110 Metrolink - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $1,655.76 $857.22 $2,269.94 $3,752.50 $1,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
111 Metrolink - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $3,812.00 $15,033.58 $9,429.94 $20,484.74 $31,234.58 $8,338.75 $239,344,044.00 $2,172,840,000.00
112 Metrolink - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $3,311.52 $2,571.66 $4,539.87 $11,400.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
113 Metrolink - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,986.96 $16,328.00 $2,723.92 $8,048.40 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $6,347.00 $23,643.58 $30,901.26 $32,288.40 $59,375.48 $13,668.75 $239,364,135.84 $2,172,840,000.00
114 Metrolink - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,385.40 $1,224.60 $1,842.58 $4,693.00 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
115 Metrolink - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,385.40 $612.30 $1,842.58 $3,564.87 $1,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
116 Metrolink - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $3,812.00 $15,896.04 $6,732.95 $21,008.89 $29,671.66 $9,530.00 $135,230,700.00 $2,172,840,000.00
117 Metrolink - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $2,770.92 $1,836.90 $3,685.16 $10,830.00 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
118 Metrolink - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,662.48 $16,328.00 $2,211.09 $7,645.98 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $6,372.00 $23,100.24 $26,734.75 $30,590.30 $56,405.51 $14,860.00 $135,242,052.00 $2,172,840,000.00
119 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $9,248.60 $12,030.24 $21,180.00 $1,001,830,944.00 $1,863,840,000.00
Subtotal $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $9,248.60 $12,030.24 $21,180.00 $1,001,830,944.00 $1,863,840,000.00
120 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $9,248.60 $11,423.08 $24,710.00 $709,241,952.00 $1,863,840,000.00
Subtotal $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $9,248.60 $11,423.08 $24,710.00 $709,241,952.00 $1,863,840,000.00
121 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $7,864.84 $10,858.28 $28,240.00 $400,725,600.00 $1,863,840,000.00
Subtotal $11,296.00 $6,947.04 $14,289.44 $7,864.84 $10,858.28 $28,240.00 $400,725,600.00 $1,863,840,000.00
122 Milliken Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $8,729.68 $5,499.70 $18,365.06 $7,147.43 $9,297.11 $16,368.15 $774,226,589.52 $1,178,506,800.00
Subtotal $8,729.68 $5,499.70 $18,365.06 $7,147.43 $9,297.11 $16,368.15 $774,226,589.52 $1,178,506,800.00
123 Milliken Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $8,729.68 $5,368.75 $18,365.06 $7,147.43 $8,827.89 $19,096.18 $548,110,418.16 $1,178,506,800.00
Subtotal $8,729.68 $5,368.75 $18,365.06 $7,147.43 $8,827.89 $19,096.18 $548,110,418.16 $1,178,506,800.00
124 Milliken Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $8,729.68 $5,368.75 $18,365.06 $6,078.04 $8,391.40 $21,824.20 $309,685,398.00 $1,178,506,800.00
Subtotal $8,729.68 $5,368.75 $18,365.06 $6,078.04 $8,391.40 $21,824.20 $309,685,398.00 $1,178,506,800.00
125 Mountain View Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $11,284.16 $7,109.02 $18,364.97 $9,238.91 $12,017.63 $21,157.80 $1,000,780,866.24 $1,861,886,400.00
Subtotal $11,284.16 $7,109.02 $18,364.97 $9,238.91 $12,017.63 $21,157.80 $1,000,780,866.24 $1,861,886,400.00
126 Mountain View Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $11,284.16 $6,939.76 $18,364.97 $9,238.91 $11,411.11 $24,684.10 $708,498,553.92 $1,861,886,400.00
Subtotal $11,284.16 $6,939.76 $18,364.97 $9,238.91 $11,411.11 $24,684.10 $708,498,553.92 $1,861,886,400.00
127 Mountain View Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $11,284.16 $6,939.76 $18,364.97 $7,856.60 $10,846.90 $28,210.40 $400,305,576.00 $1,861,886,400.00
Subtotal $11,284.16 $6,939.76 $18,364.97 $7,856.60 $10,846.90 $28,210.40 $400,305,576.00 $1,861,886,400.00
128 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $13,583.04 $8,557.32 $18,371.06 $11,121.11 $14,465.94 $25,468.20 $1,204,666,234.56 $2,648,692,800.00
Subtotal $13,583.04 $8,557.32 $18,371.06 $11,121.11 $14,465.94 $25,468.20 $1,204,666,234.56 $2,648,692,800.00
129 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $13,583.04 $8,353.57 $18,371.06 $11,121.11 $13,735.85 $29,712.90 $852,838,332.48 $2,648,692,800.00
Subtotal $13,583.04 $8,353.57 $18,371.06 $11,121.11 $13,735.85 $29,712.90 $852,838,332.48 $2,648,692,800.00
130 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $13,583.04 $8,353.57 $18,371.06 $9,457.19 $13,735.85 $33,957.60 $481,858,344.00 $2,648,692,800.00
Subtotal $13,583.04 $8,353.57 $18,371.06 $9,457.19 $13,735.85 $33,957.60 $481,858,344.00 $2,648,692,800.00
131 Spruce Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $12,229.44 $7,521.11 $12,244.73 $10,012.85 $13,024.35 $22,930.20 $1,084,616,804.16 $2,017,857,600.00
Subtotal $12,229.44 $7,521.11 $12,244.73 $10,012.85 $13,024.35 $22,930.20 $1,084,616,804.16 $2,017,857,600.00
132 Spruce Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $12,229.44 $7,521.11 $12,244.73 $10,012.85 $12,367.02 $26,751.90 $767,849,849.28 $2,017,857,600.00
Subtotal $12,229.44 $7,521.11 $12,244.73 $10,012.85 $12,367.02 $26,751.90 $767,849,849.28 $2,017,857,600.00
133 Spruce Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $12,229.44 $5,870.13 $12,244.73 $8,514.75 $11,755.55 $30,573.60 $433,839,384.00 $2,017,857,600.00
Subtotal $12,229.44 $5,870.13 $12,244.73 $8,514.75 $11,755.55 $30,573.60 $433,839,384.00 $2,017,857,600.00
134 West Greenway Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $19,524.80 $12,007.75 $20,403.42 $15,985.93 $20,793.91 $36,609.00 $1,731,634,987.20 $5,564,568,000.00
Subtotal $19,524.80 $12,007.75 $20,403.42 $15,985.93 $20,793.91 $36,609.00 $1,731,634,987.20 $5,564,568,000.00
135 West Greenway Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $19,524.80 $12,007.75 $20,403.42 $15,985.93 $19,744.45 $42,710.50 $1,225,903,617.60 $5,564,568,000.00
Subtotal $19,524.80 $12,007.75 $20,403.42 $15,985.93 $19,744.45 $42,710.50 $1,225,903,617.60 $5,564,568,000.00
Page 307
136 West Greenway Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $19,524.80 $9,371.90 $20,403.42 $13,594.14 $18,768.21 $48,812.00 $692,642,280.00 $5,564,568,000.00
Subtotal $19,524.80 $9,371.90 $20,403.42 $13,594.14 $18,768.21 $48,812.00 $692,642,280.00 $5,564,568,000.00
137 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $14,478.48 $8,904.27 $18,369.57 $11,854.26 $15,419.58 $27,147.15 $1,284,081,912.72 $3,149,069,400.00
Subtotal $14,478.48 $8,904.27 $18,369.57 $11,854.26 $15,419.58 $27,147.15 $1,284,081,912.72 $3,149,069,400.00
138 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $14,478.48 $8,904.27 $18,369.57 $11,854.26 $14,641.36 $31,671.68 $909,060,323.76 $3,149,069,400.00
Subtotal $14,478.48 $8,904.27 $18,369.57 $11,854.26 $14,641.36 $31,671.68 $909,060,323.76 $3,149,069,400.00
139 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $14,478.48 $6,949.67 $18,369.57 $10,080.64 $13,917.44 $36,196.20 $513,624,078.00 $3,149,069,400.00
Subtotal $14,478.48 $6,949.67 $18,369.57 $10,080.64 $13,917.44 $36,196.20 $513,624,078.00 $3,149,069,400.00
140 Garcia Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $13,400.88 $8,241.54 $12,245.05 $10,971.97 $14,271.94 $25,126.65 $1,188,510,646.32 $2,613,171,600.00
Subtotal $13,400.88 $8,241.54 $12,245.05 $10,971.97 $14,271.94 $25,126.65 $1,188,510,646.32 $2,613,171,600.00
141 Garcia Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $13,400.88 $8,241.54 $12,245.05 $10,971.97 $13,551.64 $29,314.43 $841,401,052.56 $2,613,171,600.00
Subtotal $13,400.88 $8,241.54 $12,245.05 $10,971.97 $13,551.64 $29,314.43 $841,401,052.56 $2,613,171,600.00
142 Garcia Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $13,400.88 $6,432.42 $12,245.05 $9,330.36 $12,881.60 $33,502.20 $475,396,218.00 $2,613,171,600.00
Subtotal $13,400.88 $6,432.42 $12,245.05 $9,330.36 $12,881.60 $33,502.20 $475,396,218.00 $2,613,171,600.00
143 Day Creek Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $15,138.32 $9,310.07 $20,417.81 $12,394.50 $16,122.31 $28,384.35 $1,342,602,462.48 $3,179,047,200.00
Subtotal $15,138.32 $9,310.07 $20,417.81 $12,394.50 $16,122.31 $28,384.35 $1,342,602,462.48 $3,179,047,200.00
144 Day Creek Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $15,138.32 $9,310.07 $20,417.81 $12,394.50 $16,122.31 $33,115.08 $950,489,697.84 $3,179,047,200.00
Subtotal $15,138.32 $9,310.07 $20,417.81 $12,394.50 $16,122.31 $33,115.08 $950,489,697.84 $3,179,047,200.00
145 Day Creek Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $15,138.32 $7,266.39 $20,417.81 $10,540.06 $14,551.71 $37,845.80 $537,031,902.00 $3,179,047,200.00
Subtotal $15,138.32 $7,266.39 $20,417.81 $10,540.06 $14,551.71 $37,845.80 $537,031,902.00 $3,179,047,200.00
146 Legacy Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $13,813.84 $8,495.51 $12,242.52 $11,310.08 $14,711.74 $25,900.95 $1,225,135,655.76 $2,900,906,400.00
Subtotal $13,813.84 $8,495.51 $12,242.52 $11,310.08 $14,711.74 $25,900.95 $1,225,135,655.76 $2,900,906,400.00
147 Legacy Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $13,813.84 $8,495.51 $12,242.52 $11,310.08 $13,969.25 $30,217.78 $867,329,572.08 $2,900,906,400.00
Subtotal $13,813.84 $8,495.51 $12,242.52 $11,310.08 $13,969.25 $30,217.78 $867,329,572.08 $2,900,906,400.00
148 Legacy Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $13,813.84 $6,630.64 $12,242.52 $9,617.89 $13,278.55 $34,534.60 $490,045,974.00 $2,900,906,400.00
Subtotal $13,813.84 $6,630.64 $12,242.52 $9,617.89 $13,278.55 $34,534.60 $490,045,974.00 $2,900,906,400.00
149 Olive Grove Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $21,916.88 $13,478.88 $18,355.39 $17,944.45 $23,341.48 $41,094.15 $1,943,786,170.32 $6,903,817,200.00
Subtotal $21,916.88 $13,478.88 $18,355.39 $17,944.45 $23,341.48 $41,094.15 $1,943,786,170.32 $6,903,817,200.00
150 Olive Grove Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $21,916.88 $13,478.88 $18,355.39 $17,944.45 $22,163.44 $47,943.18 $1,376,095,144.56 $6,903,817,200.00
Subtotal $21,916.88 $13,478.88 $18,355.39 $17,944.45 $22,163.44 $47,943.18 $1,376,095,144.56 $6,903,817,200.00
151 Olive Grove Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $21,916.88 $10,520.10 $18,355.39 $15,259.63 $21,067.60 $54,792.20 $777,501,318.00 $6,903,817,200.00
Subtotal $21,916.88 $10,520.10 $18,355.39 $15,259.63 $21,067.60 $54,792.20 $777,501,318.00 $6,903,817,200.00
152 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $25,842.88 $15,893.37 $14,278.19 $21,158.86 $27,522.67 $48,455.40 $2,291,979,184.32 $9,691,080,000.00
Subtotal $25,842.88 $15,893.37 $14,278.19 $21,158.86 $27,522.67 $48,455.40 $2,291,979,184.32 $9,691,080,000.00
153 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $25,842.88 $15,893.37 $14,278.19 $21,158.86 $26,133.61 $56,531.30 $1,622,596,906.56 $9,691,080,000.00
Subtotal $25,842.88 $15,893.37 $14,278.19 $21,158.86 $26,133.61 $56,531.30 $1,622,596,906.56 $9,691,080,000.00
154 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $25,842.88 $12,404.58 $14,278.19 $17,993.11 $24,841.47 $64,607.20 $916,776,168.00 $9,691,080,000.00
Subtotal $25,842.88 $12,404.58 $14,278.19 $17,993.11 $24,841.47 $64,607.20 $916,776,168.00 $9,691,080,000.00
155 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $525.00 $41.16 $306.15 $78.94 $2,596.00 $1,325.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
156 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $550.00 $28.80 $153.08 $78.94 $1,500.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
157 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $146.64 $988.11 $2,143.14 $868.60 $2,004.08 $366.60 $17,340,473.28 $5,973,136.00
158 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $566.28 $459.23 $110.52 $3,500.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $1,516.64 $1,624.35 $3,061.60 $1,137.01 $9,600.08 $3,391.60 $17,361,758.64 $5,973,136.00
159 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $40.32 $204.10 $77.38 $2,466.20 $1,325.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
160 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $28.20 $102.05 $77.38 $1,425.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
161 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $146.64 $961.71 $1,428.76 $852.47 $1,903.88 $427.70 $12,276,114.24 $5,973,136.00
162 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $554.28 $306.15 $108.33 $3,325.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $1,496.64 $1,584.51 $2,041.06 $1,115.54 $9,120.08 $3,452.70 $12,291,183.12 $5,973,136.00
163 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $39.24 $153.08 $71.89 $2,342.89 $1,325.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
164 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $27.48 $76.54 $71.89 $1,353.75 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
165 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $146.64 $900.13 $1,071.45 $789.90 $1,808.80 $488.80 $6,936,072.00 $5,973,136.00
166 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $539.52 $229.61 $100.64 $3,158.75 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,296.64 $1,506.37 $1,530.68 $1,034.31 $8,664.19 $3,513.80 $6,944,586.00 $5,973,136.00
167 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $219.12 $612.30 $419.88 $1,946.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
168 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $153.48 $306.15 $419.88 $1,945.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
169 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $779.94 $5,256.80 $4,285.77 $4,619.84 $7,799.40 $2,274.83 $92,229,464.88 $155,988,000.00
170 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,768.32 $918.45 $587.83 $6,950.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $1,739.94 $7,397.72 $6,122.67 $6,047.44 $18,640.40 $8,674.83 $92,250,750.24 $155,988,000.00
171 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $445.00 $214.56 $428.61 $411.54 $1,848.70 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
172 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $335.00 $150.12 $214.31 $411.54 $1,847.75 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
173 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $779.94 $5,116.41 $3,000.17 $4,534.05 $7,409.43 $2,599.80 $65,293,457.04 $155,988,000.00
174 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,730.76 $642.92 $576.16 $6,602.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $1,844.94 $7,211.85 $4,286.01 $5,933.29 $17,708.38 $8,999.80 $65,308,525.92 $155,988,000.00
175 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $550.00 $208.80 $306.15 $382.34 $1,756.26 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
176 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $475.00 $146.16 $153.08 $382.34 $1,755.36 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
177 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $779.94 $4,788.83 $2,143.54 $4,201.28 $7,038.96 $2,924.78 $36,891,162.00 $155,988,000.00
178 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $1,684.68 $459.23 $535.28 $6,272.37 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $2,054.94 $6,828.47 $3,062.00 $5,501.24 $16,822.95 $9,324.78 $36,899,676.00 $155,988,000.00
179 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $525.00 $621.96 $306.15 $1,191.49 $436.00 $1,800.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
180 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $440.00 $435.36 $153.08 $1,191.49 $350.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
181 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $2,213.22 $14,913.41 $2,143.13 $13,109.64 $9,664.39 $8,299.58 $261,717,691.44 $1,291,045,000.00
182 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $861.48 $459.23 $1,668.08 $350.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $3,463.22 $16,832.21 $3,061.59 $17,160.70 $10,800.39 $14,549.58 $261,738,976.80 $1,291,045,000.00
183 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $608.76 $214.31 $1,167.82 $414.20 $1,800.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
184 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $426.12 $107.15 $1,167.82 $332.50 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
185 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $2,582.09 $14,515.03 $1,501.30 $12,866.19 $9,181.17 $9,221.75 $185,281,925.52 $1,291,045,000.00
186 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $843.24 $321.46 $1,634.94 $332.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $3,732.09 $16,393.15 $2,144.22 $16,836.76 $10,260.37 $15,471.75 $185,296,994.40 $1,291,045,000.00
187 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $592.56 $153.08 $1,084.97 $393.49 $1,800.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
188 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $414.72 $76.54 $1,084.97 $315.87 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
189 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $2,582.09 $13,585.48 $1,069.72 $11,921.88 $8,723.78 $10,143.93 $104,685,306.00 $1,291,045,000.00
190 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $820.80 $229.61 $1,518.95 $315.87 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $3,562.09 $15,413.56 $1,528.95 $15,610.76 $9,749.01 $16,393.93 $104,693,820.00 $1,291,045,000.00
191 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $425.00 $609.00 $1,224.60 $1,166.65 $1,609.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
192 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $426.24 $612.30 $1,166.65 $2,400.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
193 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $2,889.44 $14,606.12 $8,570.80 $12,836.34 $15,891.92 $10,835.40 $256,261,544.16 $1,264,130,000.00
194 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $5,458.20 $1,836.90 $1,633.31 $4,100.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $3,789.44 $21,099.56 $12,244.60 $16,802.95 $24,000.92 $17,445.40 $256,282,829.52 $1,264,130,000.00
195 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $596.04 $857.22 $1,143.47 $1,528.55 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
196 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $417.24 $428.61 $1,143.47 $2,280.00 $3,360.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
197 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $2,889.44 $14,212.43 $5,999.20 $12,597.96 $15,097.32 $12,641.30 $181,419,269.28 $1,264,130,000.00
198 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $175.00 $5,342.40 $1,285.83 $1,600.86 $3,895.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $3,799.44 $20,568.11 $8,570.86 $16,485.76 $22,800.87 $19,251.30 $181,434,338.16 $1,264,130,000.00
199 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $580.20 $612.30 $1,062.35 $1,452.12 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
200 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $406.08 $306.15 $1,062.35 $2,166.00 $3,360.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
201 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $2,889.44 $13,302.26 $4,287.21 $11,673.34 $14,342.46 $14,447.20 $102,502,884.00 $1,264,130,000.00
202 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $5,200.20 $918.45 $1,487.29 $3,700.00 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $3,874.44 $19,488.74 $6,124.11 $15,285.32 $21,660.58 $21,057.20 $102,511,398.00 $1,264,130,000.00
203 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $792.72 $918.45 $1,086.83 $1,597.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
204 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $260.00 $792.72 $459.23 $1,086.83 $2,400.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
205 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $2,691.76 $14,172.12 $5,511.38 $11,958.14 $7,065.87 $10,094.10 $238,729,502.64 $1,090,162,800.00
206 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $1,081.76 $7,462.79 $3,673.93 $3,476.51 $3,637.42 $2,704.40 $95,940,212.64 $175,786,000.00
207 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $180.00 $1,109.64 $1,377.68 $1,521.57 $2,100.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $4,498.52 $24,329.99 $11,940.67 $19,129.88 $16,800.29 $19,408.50 $334,691,000.64 $1,265,948,800.00
208 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $777.00 $642.92 $1,065.24 $1,517.15 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
209 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $777.00 $321.46 $1,065.24 $2,280.00 $3,360.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
210 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $2,691.76 $13,889.48 $2,570.63 $11,736.07 $6,712.58 $11,776.45 $169,007,535.12 $1,090,162,800.00
211 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $1,081.76 $7,332.98 $1,928.24 $3,410.25 $3,456.22 $3,380.50 $67,920,465.12 $175,786,000.00
212 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $200.00 $1,087.80 $964.37 $1,491.34 $1,995.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $4,708.52 $23,864.26 $6,427.62 $18,768.14 $15,960.95 $21,766.95 $236,943,069.12 $1,265,948,800.00
213 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $315.00 $744.12 $459.23 $989.67 $1,441.29 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
214 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $744.12 $229.61 $989.67 $2,166.00 $3,360.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
215 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $2,691.76 $13,283.84 $1,837.13 $10,874.71 $6,376.11 $13,458.80 $95,490,186.00 $1,090,162,800.00
216 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $1,081.76 $7,024.68 $1,928.24 $3,169.56 $3,283.14 $3,718.55 $38,375,436.00 $175,786,000.00
217 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $115.00 $1,041.84 $688.84 $1,385.53 $1,895.25 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $4,488.52 $22,838.59 $5,143.04 $17,409.13 $15,161.79 $23,787.35 $133,874,136.00 $1,265,948,800.00
218 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $212.76 $306.15 $407.64 $2,700.00 $1,170.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
219 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $148.92 $153.08 $407.64 $2,334.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
220 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $1,009.60 $5,102.27 $2,142.88 $4,485.15 $3,786.00 $4,417.00 $89,540,414.40 $145,130,000.00
221 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $894.96 $459.23 $570.70 $1,980.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $1,759.60 $6,358.91 $3,061.34 $5,871.12 $10,800.00 $8,117.00 $89,561,699.76 $145,130,000.00
222 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $208.32 $214.31 $399.54 $2,565.00 $1,170.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
223 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $145.80 $107.15 $399.54 $2,217.30 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
224 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $1,009.60 $4,967.23 $1,500.52 $4,401.86 $3,596.70 $5,048.00 $63,389,755.20 $145,130,000.00
225 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $876.00 $321.46 $559.36 $1,881.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $1,759.60 $6,197.35 $2,143.44 $5,760.29 $10,260.00 $8,748.00 $63,404,824.08 $145,130,000.00
226 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $202.68 $153.08 $371.19 $2,436.75 $1,170.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
227 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $141.96 $76.54 $371.19 $2,106.43 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
228 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $1,009.60 $4,647.95 $1,071.44 $4,078.78 $3,417.50 $5,679.00 $35,815,560.00 $145,130,000.00
229 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $852.72 $229.61 $519.67 $1,786.95 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,764.60 $5,845.31 $1,530.67 $5,340.85 $9,747.63 $9,379.00 $35,824,074.00 $145,130,000.00
230 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $255.00 $306.15 $488.52 $1,385.00 $1,170.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
231 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $178.56 $153.08 $488.52 $1,464.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
232 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $1,209.92 $6,116.15 $2,143.07 $5,375.07 $7,562.00 $6,805.80 $107,306,594.88 $217,785,600.00
233 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $155.00 $1,194.96 $459.23 $683.93 $3,989.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $2,009.92 $7,744.67 $3,061.53 $7,036.04 $14,400.00 $10,505.80 $107,327,880.24 $217,785,600.00
234 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $425.00 $249.60 $214.31 $478.82 $1,315.75 $1,170.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
235 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $174.72 $107.15 $478.82 $1,390.80 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
236 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $1,209.92 $5,952.81 $15,003.01 $5,275.25 $7,183.90 $7,562.00 $75,967,247.04 $217,785,600.00
237 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,169.64 $321.46 $670.34 $3,789.55 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $2,194.92 $7,546.77 $15,645.93 $6,903.22 $13,680.00 $11,262.00 $75,982,315.92 $217,785,600.00
238 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $243.00 $153.08 $444.85 $1,249.96 $1,170.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
239 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $170.04 $76.54 $444.85 $1,321.26 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
240 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $1,209.92 $5,571.68 $1,070.78 $4,888.08 $6,825.46 $8,318.20 $42,921,912.00 $217,785,600.00
241 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,138.44 $229.61 $622.78 $3,600.07 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $2,019.92 $7,123.16 $1,530.01 $6,400.55 $12,996.75 $12,018.20 $42,930,426.00 $217,785,600.00
242 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $579.12 $816.40 $1,109.48 $1,100.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
243 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $405.36 $408.20 $1,109.48 $742.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
244 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $2,747.84 $13,890.33 $5,715.51 $12,207.28 $20,608.80 $13,739.20 $243,703,181.76 $1,133,484,000.00
245 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,389.96 $1,224.60 $1,553.27 $1,550.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $3,507.84 $16,264.77 $8,164.71 $15,979.50 $24,000.80 $20,349.20 $243,724,467.12 $1,133,484,000.00
246 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $566.88 $571.48 $1,087.43 $1,045.00 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
247 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $300.00 $396.84 $285.74 $1,087.43 $704.90 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
248 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $2,747.84 $13,515.94 $4,001.54 $11,980.58 $19,578.36 $15,456.60 $172,528,630.08 $1,133,484,000.00
249 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $180.00 $1,360.44 $857.22 $1,522.41 $1,472.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
Subtotal $3,452.84 $15,840.10 $5,715.98 $15,677.86 $22,800.76 $22,306.60 $172,543,698.96 $1,133,484,002.00
250 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $551.76 $408.20 $1,010.29 $992.75 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
251 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $386.28 $204.10 $1,010.29 $668.80 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
252 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $2,747.84 $12,650.37 $2,857.75 $11,101.27 $18,599.44 $17,174.00 $97,479,624.00 $1,133,484,000.00
253 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $1,324.20 $612.30 $1,414.40 $1,398.87 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $3,572.84 $14,912.61 $4,082.35 $14,536.24 $21,659.86 $24,024.00 $97,488,138.00 $1,133,484,000.00
254 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $505.80 $3,061.50 $969.03 $950.00 $3,900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
255 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $354.12 $1,530.75 $969.03 $1,200.00 $5,040.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
256 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $2,400.00 $14,688.00 $21,432.00 $10,662.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $212,853,600.00 $900,000,000.00
257 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $1,566.84 $4,592.25 $1,356.64 $2,634.96 $1,260.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
Subtotal $4,500.00 $17,114.76 $30,616.50 $13,956.71 $19,784.96 $25,200.00 $212,874,885.36 $900,000,000.00
258 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $495.12 $2,143.05 $949.78 $902.50 $3,900.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
259 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $855.00 $346.56 $1,071.53 $949.78 $1,140.00 $5,040.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
260 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $2,400.00 $14,328.00 $15,000.00 $10,464.00 $14,250.00 $16,500.00 $150,688,800.00 $900,000,000.00
261 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $475.00 $1,533.60 $3,214.58 $1,329.69 $2,503.21 $1,260.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Subtotal $4,605.00 $16,703.28 $21,429.16 $13,693.25 $18,795.71 $26,700.00 $150,703,868.88 $900,000,000.00
262 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $865.00 $481.92 $1,530.75 $882.40 $857.37 $3,900.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
263 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $700.00 $337.32 $765.38 $882.40 $1,083.00 $5,040.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
264 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $2,400.00 $13,392.00 $10,716.00 $9,696.00 $13,539.00 $18,000.00 $85,140,000.00 $900,000,000.00
265 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $495.00 $1,492.80 $2,296.13 $1,235.36 $2,378.04 $1,260.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
Subtotal $4,460.00 $15,704.04 $15,308.26 $12,696.15 $17,857.41 $28,200.00 $85,148,514.00 $900,000,000.00
266 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level C Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $12,445.80 $1,348.30 $4,708.66 $8,297.20 $7,882.34 $77,786.25 $588,686,340.00 $3,982,656,000.00
Subtotal $12,445.80 $1,348.30 $4,708.66 $8,297.20 $7,882.34 $77,786.25 $588,686,340.00 $3,982,656,000.00
267 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level D Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $12,445.80 $1,223.84 $4,708.66 $8,089.77 $7,882.34 $82,972.00 $2,183,076,292.00 $3,982,656,000.00
Subtotal $12,445.80 $1,223.84 $4,708.66 $8,089.77 $7,882.34 $82,972.00 $2,183,076,292.00 $3,982,656,000.00
268 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level F Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $12,445.80 $1,078.64 $4,708.66 $7,882.34 $7,882.34 $88,157.75 $2,183,076,292.00 $3,982,656,000.00
Subtotal $12,445.80 $1,078.64 $4,708.66 $7,882.34 $7,882.34 $88,157.75 $2,183,076,292.00 $3,982,656,000.00
269 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates General Laborer Hour 1 $28.50 $45.00 $40.00 $49.00 $45.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00
270 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Skilled Laborer Hour 1 $32.75 $75.00 $45.00 $56.00 $55.00 $38.00 $40.00 $45.00
271 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Irrigation Repair Technician Hour 1 $42.50 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $80.00 $65.00 $50.00 $65.00
272 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator Hour 1 $46.50 $55.00 $75.00 $65.00 $80.00 $75.00 $46.00 $65.00
Subtotal $150.25 $250.00 $235.00 $245.00 $260.00 $213.00 $171.00 $210.00
273 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $150.00 $0.00
274 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $0.08 $0.00
275 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.08 $0.00
Total $1,107,599.45 $1,377,985.88 $1,651,722.01 $1,702,731.28 $1,958,961.43 $2,962,843.13 $66,198,243,197.56 ################
Unit Price
Page 308
Item NumSection Item Code Description Reference Unit of Measure Quantity Greenfield Management BrightVIew Landscape Services Stay Green Inc Mariposa Landscapes Inc.Colts Landscape JAS Landscape LLC New Generation Landscape Management Inc.US Landscape Inc
1 Archibald Library - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $433.08 $612.30 $593.80 $1,100.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
2 Archibald Library - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $433.08 $306.15 $593.80 $1,195.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
3 Archibald Library - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $0.08 $0.35 $0.31 $0.47 $0.71 $0.95 $7,095.12 $12,000.00
4 Archibald Library - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $1,039.56 $918.45 $1,425.12 $1,100.00 $1,200.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
5 Archibald Library - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $423.96 $428.61 $581.20 $1,045.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
6 Archibald Library - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $423.96 $214.31 $581.20 $1,135.25 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
7 Archibald Library - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $0.08 $0.34 $0.22 $0.46 $0.67 $1.10 $5,022.96 $12,000.00
8 Archibald Library - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,017.48 $642.92 $1,394.89 $1,045.00 $1,200.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
9 Archibald Library - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $412.68 $306.15 $548.82 $992.75 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
10 Archibald Library - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $412.68 $153.08 $548.82 $1,078.48 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
11 Archibald Library - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13810 $0.08 $0.32 $0.16 $0.44 $0.64 $1.25 $2,838.00 $12,000.00
12 Archibald Library - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $990.36 $459.23 $1,317.16 $992.75 $1,200.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
13 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,212.08 $2,449.20 $3,517.59 $1,100.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
14 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $75.00 $1,836.12 $1,224.60 $3,517.59 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
15 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $0.08 $0.31 $0.07 $0.36 $0.06 $0.20 $7,095.12 $10,000.00
16 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $0.08 $0.40 $0.44 $0.07 $0.35 $0.15 $7,095.12 $21,000.00
17 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $3,285.96 $3,673.80 $4,924.62 $3,500.00 $950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
18 Bark at Central Park - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,285.96 $20,410.00 $4,663.22 $1,257.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
19 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,165.16 $1,714.44 $3,517.59 $1,045.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
20 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $1,797.24 $857.22 $3,517.59 $1,045.00 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
21 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $0.08 $0.31 $0.06 $0.36 $0.06 $0.25 $5,022.96 $10,000.00
22 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $0.08 $0.31 $0.23 $0.07 $0.33 $0.18 $5,022.96 $21,000.00
23 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $3,216.24 $2,571.66 $4,924.62 $3,325.00 $950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
24 Bark at Central Park - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,216.24 $20,410.00 $4,577.54 $1,194.15 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
25 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $2,107.56 $1,224.60 $3,517.59 $992.75 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
26 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $1,749.36 $612.30 $3,517.59 $992.75 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
27 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 108900 $0.08 $0.29 $0.05 $0.36 $0.06 $0.30 $2,838.00 $10,000.00
28 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 22300 $0.08 $0.32 $0.16 $0.06 $0.32 $0.20 $2,838.00 $21,000.00
29 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $3,130.56 $1,836.90 $4,924.62 $3,158.75 $950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
30 Bark at Central Park - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,130.56 $20,410.00 $4,298.13 $1,134.44 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
31 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,314.36 $3,061.50 $1,801.91 $1,200.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
32 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $1,971.60 $1,530.75 $2,702.87 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
33 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $0.08 $0.31 $0.20 $0.43 $0.69 $0.10 $7,095.12 $10,000.00
34 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $200.00 $3,285.96 $4,592.25 $4,504.78 $1,360.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
35 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $6,571.80 $20,410.00 $9,009.56 $1,602.00 $1,690.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
36 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,285.96 $16,238.00 $4,504.78 $1,550.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
37 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level A Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,857.76 $15,307.50 $13,514.35 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
38 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,290.24 $1,714.44 $1,768.80 $1,140.00 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
39 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $685.00 $1,935.36 $857.22 $2,653.21 $1,140.00 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
40 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $0.08 $0.31 $0.11 $0.42 $0.66 $0.15 $5,022.96 $10,000.00
41 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $3,225.60 $2,571.66 $4,422.01 $1,292.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
42 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $795.00 $6,451.08 $20,410.00 $8,844.02 $1,521.90 $1,690.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
43 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,225.60 $16,328.00 $4,422.01 $1,472.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
44 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level B Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,676.68 $15,307.50 $13,266.03 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
45 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,248.84 $1,530.75 $1,660.84 $1,083.00 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
46 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $650.00 $1,873.20 $765.38 $2,491.26 $1,083.00 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
47 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 105200 $0.08 $0.30 $0.10 $0.39 $0.62 $0.18 $2,838.00 $10,000.00
48 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $3,122.04 $2,296.13 $4,152.10 $1,227.40 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
49 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Trail Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $685.00 $6,243.96 $20,410.00 $8,304.20 $1,445.80 $1,690.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
50 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $3,134.64 $16,328.00 $4,152.10 $1,398.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
51 Foothill Trailhead - Service Level C Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $9,365.88 $15,307.50 $12,456.30 $10,500.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
52 Lions Park - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $711.36 $1,224.60 $975.27 $899.74 $2,340.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
53 Lions Park - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $625.00 $711.36 $612.30 $975.27 $1,538.00 $3,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
54 Lions Park - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $0.08 $0.75 $0.15 $0.98 $0.29 $0.15 $7,095.12 $22,000.00
55 Lions Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $0.06 $0.19 $0.17 $0.26 $0.27 $0.50 $7,095.12 $31,000.00
56 Lions Park - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $1,422.84 $1,836.90 $1,950.54 $3,750.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
57 Lions Park - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $2,134.20 $16,328.00 $2,925.81 $1,767.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
58 Lions Park - Service Level A Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,019.72 $14,695.20 $13,514.35 $0.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
59 Lions Park - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $698.28 $857.22 $957.28 $854.75 $2,340.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
60 Lions Park - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $780.00 $698.28 $428.61 $957.28 $1,461.00 $3,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
61 Lions Park - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $0.08 $0.74 $0.14 $0.96 $0.27 $0.18 $5,022.96 $22,000.00
62 Lions Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $0.08 $0.19 $0.09 $0.26 $0.26 $0.60 $5,022.96 $31,000.00
63 Lions Park - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $1,396.56 $1,285.83 $1,914.55 $3,562.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
64 Lions Park - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $2,094.84 $16,328.00 $2,871.83 $1,678.65 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
65 Lions Park - Service Level B Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,019.72 $14,695.20 $13,266.03 $0.00 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
66 Lions Park - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $662.40 $612.30 $880.98 $812.01 $2,340.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
67 Lions Park - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $662.40 $306.15 $880.98 $1,387.95 $3,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
68 Lions Park - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 24330 $0.08 $0.70 $0.10 $0.89 $0.26 $0.20 $0.12 $22,000.00
69 Lions Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 33565 $0.08 $0.18 $0.06 $0.24 $0.24 $0.65 $0.08 $31,000.00
70 Lions Park - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $1,324.80 $918.45 $1,761.97 $3,384.37 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
71 Lions Park - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $1,987.20 $16,328.00 $2,642.95 $1,594.71 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
72 Lions Park - Service Level C Restroom Building Maint.Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $2,082.00 $14,695.20 $12,456.30 $0.00 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
73 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $225.24 $612.30 $584.80 $1,419.36 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
74 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $220.32 $306.15 $584.80 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
75 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $0.08 $0.35 $0.32 $0.48 $0.40 $0.15 $7,095.12 $13,000.00
76 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $1,560.96 $918.45 $1,403.53 $1,650.00 $900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
77 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $220.44 $428.61 $573.11 $1,348.39 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
78 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $675.00 $215.64 $214.31 $573.11 $1,140.00 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
79 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $0.08 $0.34 $0.22 $0.47 $0.38 $0.18 $5,022.96 $13,000.00
80 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,527.84 $642.92 $1,375.46 $1,567.50 $900.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
81 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $214.56 $306.15 $528.12 $1,280.97 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
82 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $209.88 $153.08 $528.12 $1,083.00 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
83 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 13360 $0.08 $0.32 $0.16 $0.44 $0.36 $0.20 $2,838.00 $13,000.00
84 Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $1,487.16 $459.23 $1,267.49 $1,488.69 $900.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
85 Ellena Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $15,600.00
86 Ellena Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $15,600.00
87 Ellena Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 170188 $0.08 $0.04 $0.01 $0.05 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $15,600.00
88 Kenyon Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $0.08 $0.05 $0.09 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $20,400.00
89 Kenyon Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $0.08 $0.05 $0.09 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $20,400.00
90 Kenyon Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 215814 $0.08 $0.04 $0.09 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $20,400.00
91 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $2,838.00 $21,600.00
92 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $21,600.00
93 Victoria Arbors Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 219197 $0.08 $0.04 $0.07 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $21,600.00
94 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $0.08 $0.05 $0.06 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $21,600.00
95 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $0.08 $0.05 $0.06 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $21,600.00
96 Victoria Groves Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 193378 $0.08 $0.04 $0.06 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $21,600.00
97 Vintage Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $0.08 $0.05 $0.06 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $21,600.00
98 Vintage Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $0.08 $0.05 $0.06 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $21,600.00
99 Vintage Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 231250 $0.08 $0.04 $0.06 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $21,600.00
100 Windrows Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $26,400.00
101 Windrows Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $26,400.00
102 Windrows Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 276078 $0.08 $0.04 $0.07 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $26,400.00
103 Metrolink - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,488.36 $2,449.20 $2,040.51 $5,200.00 $1,500.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
104 Metrolink - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $1,488.36 $1,224.60 $2,040.51 $3,950.00 $1,300.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
105 Metrolink - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $0.08 $0.36 $0.31 $0.61 $0.69 $0.15 $7,095.12 $45,600.00
106 Metrolink - Service Level A Irrigation Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $3,850.00 $5,060.64 $3,673.80 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
107 Metrolink - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $2,976.84 $3,673.80 $4,081.02 $9,500.00 $900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
108 Metrolink - Service Level A Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $165.00 $1,786.08 $16,328.00 $2,448.61 $8,472.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
109 Metrolink - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,655.76 $1,714.44 $2,269.94 $4,940.00 $1,500.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
110 Metrolink - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $850.00 $1,655.76 $857.22 $2,269.94 $3,752.50 $1,300.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
111 Metrolink - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $0.08 $0.32 $0.20 $0.43 $0.66 $0.18 $5,022.96 $45,600.00
112 Metrolink - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $3,311.52 $2,571.66 $4,539.87 $11,400.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
113 Metrolink - Service Level B Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,986.96 $16,328.00 $2,723.92 $8,048.40 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
114 Metrolink - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $950.00 $1,385.40 $1,224.60 $1,842.58 $4,693.00 $1,500.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
115 Metrolink - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $1,385.40 $612.30 $1,842.58 $3,564.87 $1,300.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
116 Metrolink - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 47650 $0.08 $0.33 $0.14 $0.44 $0.62 $0.20 $2,838.00 $45,600.00
117 Metrolink - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $2,770.92 $1,836.90 $3,685.16 $10,830.00 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
118 Metrolink - Service Level C Trash Receptacle Maint.Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,662.48 $16,328.00 $2,211.09 $7,645.98 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
119 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $0.08 $0.05 $0.10 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $13,200.00
120 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $0.08 $0.05 $0.10 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $13,200.00
121 Coyote Canyon Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141200 $0.08 $0.05 $0.10 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $13,200.00
122 Milliken Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $0.08 $0.05 $0.17 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $10,800.00
123 Milliken Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $0.08 $0.05 $0.17 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $10,800.00
124 Milliken Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 109121 $0.08 $0.05 $0.17 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $10,800.00
125 Mountain View Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $0.08 $0.05 $0.13 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $13,200.00
126 Mountain View Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $0.08 $0.05 $0.13 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $13,200.00
127 Mountain View Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 141052 $0.08 $0.05 $0.13 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $13,200.00
128 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $15,600.00
129 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $15,600.00
130 Ralph M. Lewis Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 169788 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $15,600.00
131 Spruce Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $0.08 $0.05 $0.08 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $13,200.00
132 Spruce Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $0.08 $0.05 $0.08 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $13,200.00
133 Spruce Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 152868 $0.08 $0.04 $0.08 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $13,200.00
134 West Greenway Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $0.08 $0.05 $0.08 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $22,800.00
135 West Greenway Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $0.08 $0.05 $0.08 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $22,800.00
136 West Greenway Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 244060 $0.08 $0.04 $0.08 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $22,800.00
137 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $0.08 $0.05 $0.10 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $17,400.00
138 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $0.08 $0.05 $0.10 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $17,400.00
139 Etiwanda Creek Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 180981 $0.08 $0.04 $0.10 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $17,400.00
140 Garcia Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $15,600.00
141 Garcia Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $15,600.00
142 Garcia Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 167511 $0.08 $0.04 $0.07 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $15,600.00
143 Day Creek Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $16,800.00
144 Day Creek Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $0.08 $0.05 $0.11 $0.07 $0.09 $0.18 $5,022.96 $16,800.00
145 Day Creek Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 189229 $0.08 $0.04 $0.11 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $16,800.00
146 Legacy Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $16,800.00
147 Legacy Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $16,800.00
148 Legacy Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 172673 $0.08 $0.04 $0.07 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $16,800.00
149 Olive Grove Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $25,200.00
150 Olive Grove Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $0.08 $0.05 $0.07 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $25,200.00
151 Olive Grove Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 273961 $0.08 $0.04 $0.07 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $25,200.00
152 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $0.08 $0.05 $0.04 $0.07 $0.09 $0.15 $7,095.12 $30,000.00
153 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $0.08 $0.05 $0.04 $0.07 $0.08 $0.18 $5,022.96 $30,000.00
154 Rancho Summit Park - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 323036 $0.08 $0.04 $0.04 $0.06 $0.08 $0.20 $2,838.00 $30,000.00
155 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $525.00 $41.16 $306.15 $78.94 $2,596.00 $1,325.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
156 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $550.00 $28.80 $153.08 $78.94 $1,500.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
157 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $0.06 $0.40 $0.88 $0.36 $0.82 $0.15 $7,095.12 $2,444.00
158 Fire Station 171 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $566.28 $459.23 $110.52 $3,500.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
159 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $40.32 $204.10 $77.38 $2,466.20 $1,325.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
160 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $28.20 $102.05 $77.38 $1,425.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
161 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $0.06 $0.39 $0.58 $0.35 $0.78 $0.18 $5,022.96 $2,444.00
162 Fire Station 171 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $554.28 $306.15 $108.33 $3,325.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
163 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $39.24 $153.08 $71.89 $2,342.89 $1,325.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
164 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $27.48 $76.54 $71.89 $1,353.75 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
165 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 2444 $0.06 $0.37 $0.44 $0.32 $0.74 $0.20 $2,838.00 $2,444.00
166 Fire Station 171 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $539.52 $229.61 $100.64 $3,158.75 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
167 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $219.12 $612.30 $419.88 $1,946.00 $1,950.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
168 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $153.48 $306.15 $419.88 $1,945.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
169 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $0.06 $0.40 $0.33 $0.36 $0.60 $0.18 $7,095.12 $12,000.00
170 Fire Station 172 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,768.32 $918.45 $587.83 $6,950.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
171 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $445.00 $214.56 $428.61 $411.54 $1,848.70 $1,950.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
172 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $335.00 $150.12 $214.31 $411.54 $1,847.75 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
173 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $0.06 $0.39 $0.23 $0.35 $0.57 $0.20 $5,022.96 $12,000.00
174 Fire Station 172 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,730.76 $642.92 $576.16 $6,602.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
175 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $550.00 $208.80 $306.15 $382.34 $1,756.26 $1,950.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
176 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $475.00 $146.16 $153.08 $382.34 $1,755.36 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
177 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12999 $0.06 $0.37 $0.16 $0.32 $0.54 $0.23 $2,838.00 $12,000.00
178 Fire Station 172 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $1,684.68 $459.23 $535.28 $6,272.37 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
179 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $525.00 $621.96 $306.15 $1,191.49 $436.00 $1,800.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
180 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $440.00 $435.36 $153.08 $1,191.49 $350.00 $3,600.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
181 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $0.06 $0.40 $0.06 $0.36 $0.26 $0.23 $7,095.12 $35,000.00
182 Fire Station 173 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $861.48 $459.23 $1,668.08 $350.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
183 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $575.00 $608.76 $214.31 $1,167.82 $414.20 $1,800.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
184 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $426.12 $107.15 $1,167.82 $332.50 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
185 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $0.07 $0.39 $0.04 $0.35 $0.25 $0.25 $5,022.96 $35,000.00
186 Fire Station 173 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $843.24 $321.46 $1,634.94 $332.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
187 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $592.56 $153.08 $1,084.97 $393.49 $1,800.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
188 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $414.72 $76.54 $1,084.97 $315.87 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
189 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36887 $0.07 $0.37 $0.03 $0.32 $0.24 $0.28 $2,838.00 $35,000.00
190 Fire Station 173 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $820.80 $229.61 $1,518.95 $315.87 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
191 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $425.00 $609.00 $1,224.60 $1,166.65 $1,609.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
192 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $426.24 $612.30 $1,166.65 $2,400.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
193 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $0.08 $0.40 $0.24 $0.36 $0.44 $0.30 $7,095.12 $35,000.00
194 Fire Station 174 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $5,458.20 $1,836.90 $1,633.31 $4,100.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
195 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $596.04 $857.22 $1,143.47 $1,528.55 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
Page 309
196 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $417.24 $428.61 $1,143.47 $2,280.00 $3,360.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
197 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $0.08 $0.39 $0.17 $0.35 $0.42 $0.35 $5,022.96 $35,000.00
198 Fire Station 174 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $175.00 $5,342.40 $1,285.83 $1,600.86 $3,895.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
199 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $580.20 $612.30 $1,062.35 $1,452.12 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
200 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $406.08 $306.15 $1,062.35 $2,166.00 $3,360.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
201 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 36118 $0.08 $0.37 $0.12 $0.32 $0.40 $0.40 $2,838.00 $35,000.00
202 Fire Station 174 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $5,200.20 $918.45 $1,487.29 $3,700.00 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
203 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $792.72 $918.45 $1,086.83 $1,597.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
204 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $260.00 $792.72 $459.23 $1,086.83 $2,400.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
205 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $0.08 $0.42 $0.16 $0.36 $0.21 $0.30 $7,095.12 $32,400.00
206 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $0.08 $0.55 $0.27 $0.26 $0.27 $0.20 $7,095.12 $13,000.00
207 Fire Station 175 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $180.00 $1,109.64 $1,377.68 $1,521.57 $2,100.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
208 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $385.00 $777.00 $642.92 $1,065.24 $1,517.15 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
209 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $777.00 $321.46 $1,065.24 $2,280.00 $3,360.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
210 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $0.08 $0.41 $0.08 $0.35 $0.20 $0.35 $5,022.96 $32,400.00
211 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $0.08 $0.54 $0.14 $0.25 $0.26 $0.25 $5,022.96 $13,000.00
212 Fire Station 175 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $200.00 $1,087.80 $964.37 $1,491.34 $1,995.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
213 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $315.00 $744.12 $459.23 $989.67 $1,441.29 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
214 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $744.12 $229.61 $989.67 $2,166.00 $3,360.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
215 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 33647 $0.08 $0.39 $0.05 $0.32 $0.19 $0.40 $2,838.00 $32,400.00
216 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Turf Maintenance Annual cos 13522 $0.08 $0.52 $0.14 $0.23 $0.24 $0.28 $2,838.00 $13,000.00
217 Fire Station 175 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $115.00 $1,041.84 $688.84 $1,385.53 $1,895.25 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
218 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $212.76 $306.15 $407.64 $2,700.00 $1,170.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
219 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $148.92 $153.08 $407.64 $2,334.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
220 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $0.08 $0.40 $0.17 $0.36 $0.30 $0.35 $7,095.12 $11,500.00
221 Fire Station 176 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $894.96 $459.23 $570.70 $1,980.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
222 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $208.32 $214.31 $399.54 $2,565.00 $1,170.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
223 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $145.80 $107.15 $399.54 $2,217.30 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
224 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $0.08 $0.39 $0.12 $0.35 $0.29 $0.40 $5,022.96 $11,500.00
225 Fire Station 176 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $876.00 $321.46 $559.36 $1,881.00 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
226 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $202.68 $153.08 $371.19 $2,436.75 $1,170.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
227 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $320.00 $141.96 $76.54 $371.19 $2,106.43 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
228 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 12620 $0.08 $0.37 $0.08 $0.32 $0.27 $0.45 $2,838.00 $11,500.00
229 Fire Station 176 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $150.00 $852.72 $229.61 $519.67 $1,786.95 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
230 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $255.00 $306.15 $488.52 $1,385.00 $1,170.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
231 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $295.00 $178.56 $153.08 $488.52 $1,464.00 $1,680.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
232 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $0.08 $0.40 $0.14 $0.36 $0.50 $0.45 $7,095.12 $14,400.00
233 Fire Station 177 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $155.00 $1,194.96 $459.23 $683.93 $3,989.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
234 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $425.00 $249.60 $214.31 $478.82 $1,315.75 $1,170.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
235 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $174.72 $107.15 $478.82 $1,390.80 $1,680.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
236 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $0.08 $0.39 $0.99 $0.35 $0.48 $0.50 $5,022.96 $14,400.00
237 Fire Station 177 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $285.00 $1,169.64 $321.46 $670.34 $3,789.55 $850.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
238 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $350.00 $243.00 $153.08 $444.85 $1,249.96 $1,170.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
239 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $275.00 $170.04 $76.54 $444.85 $1,321.26 $1,680.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
240 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 15124 $0.08 $0.37 $0.07 $0.32 $0.45 $0.55 $2,838.00 $14,400.00
241 Fire Station 177 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,138.44 $229.61 $622.78 $3,600.07 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
242 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $250.00 $579.12 $816.40 $1,109.48 $1,100.00 $2,400.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
243 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $325.00 $405.36 $408.20 $1,109.48 $742.00 $3,360.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
244 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $0.08 $0.40 $0.17 $0.36 $0.60 $0.40 $7,095.12 $33,000.00
245 Fire Station 178 - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $185.00 $1,389.96 $1,224.60 $1,553.27 $1,550.00 $850.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
246 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $566.88 $571.48 $1,087.43 $1,045.00 $2,400.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
247 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $300.00 $396.84 $285.74 $1,087.43 $704.90 $3,600.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
248 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $0.08 $0.39 $0.12 $0.35 $0.57 $0.45 $5,022.96 $33,000.00
249 Fire Station 178 - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $180.00 $1,360.44 $857.22 $1,522.41 $1,472.50 $850.00 $5,022.96 $1.00
250 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $551.76 $408.20 $1,010.29 $992.75 $2,400.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
251 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $375.00 $386.28 $204.10 $1,010.29 $668.80 $3,600.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
252 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 34348 $0.08 $0.37 $0.08 $0.32 $0.54 $0.50 $2,838.00 $33,000.00
253 Fire Station 178 - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $225.00 $1,324.20 $612.30 $1,414.40 $1,398.87 $850.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
254 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $505.80 $3,061.50 $969.03 $950.00 $3,900.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
255 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $775.00 $354.12 $1,530.75 $969.03 $1,200.00 $5,040.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
256 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $0.08 $0.49 $0.71 $0.36 $0.50 $0.50 $7,095.12 $30,000.00
257 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level A Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $450.00 $1,566.84 $4,592.25 $1,356.64 $2,634.96 $1,260.00 $7,095.12 $0.00
258 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $875.00 $495.12 $2,143.05 $949.78 $902.50 $3,900.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
259 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $855.00 $346.56 $1,071.53 $949.78 $1,140.00 $5,040.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
260 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $0.08 $0.48 $0.50 $0.35 $0.48 $0.55 $5,022.96 $30,000.00
261 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level B Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $475.00 $1,533.60 $3,214.58 $1,329.69 $2,503.21 $1,260.00 $5,022.96 $0.00
262 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Pest Control Annual Lum 1 $865.00 $481.92 $1,530.75 $882.40 $857.37 $3,900.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
263 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Tree Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $700.00 $337.32 $765.38 $882.40 $1,083.00 $5,040.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
264 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Shrub, Groundcover, Vine and Landscape Mulch Maintenance Annual cos 30000 $0.08 $0.45 $0.36 $0.32 $0.45 $0.60 $2,838.00 $30,000.00
265 Additive Bid One - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Service Level C Hardscape Maintenance Annual Lum 1 $495.00 $1,492.80 $2,296.13 $1,235.36 $2,378.04 $1,260.00 $2,838.00 $0.00
266 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level C Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $0.06 $0.01 $0.02 $0.04 $0.04 $0.38 $2,838.00 $19,200.00
267 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level D Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $0.06 $0.01 $0.02 $0.04 $0.04 $0.40 $10,524.40 $19,200.00
268 Additive Bid Two - Central Park - Service Level F Weed Abatement Annual cos 207430 $0.06 $0.01 $0.02 $0.04 $0.04 $0.43 $10,524.40 $19,200.00
269 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates General Laborer Hour 1 $28.50 $45.00 $40.00 $49.00 $45.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00
270 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Skilled Laborer Hour 1 $32.75 $75.00 $45.00 $56.00 $55.00 $38.00 $40.00 $45.00
271 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Irrigation Repair Technician Hour 1 $42.50 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $80.00 $65.00 $50.00 $65.00
272 Extra Work Schedule - Labor Rates Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator Hour 1 $46.50 $55.00 $75.00 $65.00 $80.00 $75.00 $46.00 $65.00
273 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $150.00 $0.00
274 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $0.08 $0.00
275 Additional Charges Additional Charges (Please Specify)Lot 1 $0.00 $0.00 no bid no bid $0.00 no bid $150.00 $0.00
Page 310
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 20
EXHIBIT D
CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE
1. Contractor acknowledges that this contract is subject to the provisions of Division 2,
Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code
relating to public works and the awarding public agencies, City and RCFPD
(collectively “City” in this Exhibit), and agrees to be bound by all the provisions
thereof as though set forth in full herein.
2. This is a public work and requires the payment of prevailing wages for the work or
craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract
by Contractor or by any subcontractor pursuant to Section 1771 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of
California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and
the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk or may be obtained at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm.
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
City, as a penalty, not more than $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof,
for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated
prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by Contractor or by any
subcontractor under Contractor, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
3. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, and except for projects
involving construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work of $25,000
or less, or maintenance work of $15,000 or less, no contractor or subcontractor shall
be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of
Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any
public work contract unless currently registered and qualified to perform public
work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes, only,
pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].
4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1776, Contractor shall maintain and make available
an accurate record showing the name of each worker and hours worked each day and
each week by each worker employed by Contractor performing services covered by
this Agreement. Contractor and its subcontractors shall furnish electronic certified
payroll records to the Labor Commissioner in accordance with Labor Code Section
1771.4. The project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the
Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with
Page 311
Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 10/02/13
Page 21
Section 1776 by itself and all of its subcontractors. The Contractor shall post job site
notices, as prescribed by regulation.
5. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections
1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200
et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. The
Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these Sections for all
apprenticeable occupations. Before commencing Work on this Project, the
Contractor shall provide the City with a copy of the information submitted to any
applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) Days after concluding Work,
Contractor and each of its Subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement
of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Contract.
6. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section
1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall,
as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in
the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each
calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8
hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of
the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.
7. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be
required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with
the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, by signing the Agreement to
which this Exhibit is attached, Contractor hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which
require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’
compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before
commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Page 312
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director
Paige Eberle, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMDs
6R, 9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and
Irrigation Maintenance in an Amount Not to Exceed $772,181 for FY
2025/26. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council:
1. Award and authorize the execution of a professional services agreement for LMDs 6R, 9,
and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance to
Mariposa Landscapes Inc., of Irwindale, California, effective October 1, 2025, for a one-
year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6)
additional years, in an amount not to exceed $772,181 for FY 2025/26, and an estimated
$6,099,020 over seven years, contingent upon approval of future budgets.
2. Authorize an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $772,181 for FY 2025/26.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests
for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. Currently, LMDs 6R, 9, and 10
parkways, paseos, and median island landscapes are maintained under a single contract.
The updated specifications were submitted to the Procurement Division to prepare a formal
Request for Proposals (RFP). Procurement prepared and posted RFP #25/26-003 for LMDs 6R,
9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance. There were
369 vendors notified; 27 prospective bidders downloaded or viewed the bid package, and four (4)
responses were received.
ANALYSIS:
An evaluation committee of City staff conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and
scored and ranked the four (4) responsive proposals in accordance with the RFP evaluation
criteria listed in Table 1. Cost is just one factor in the evaluation of RFP responses; therefore the
low bidder will not necessarily be awarded a contract. Table 2. Reflects the vendor rankings.
Page 313
Page 2
3
0
0
9
Table 1. Evaluation Criteria for Written Proposals
Criteria Description Weight
Vendor Expertise 10%
Quality of proposed goods or services 15%
Extent to which the Vendor’s goods or services
meet the City’s and RCFPD’s needs
25%
Vendor’s history and resources available to
provide the required services
15%
Experience and professional qualifications of
staff
20%
Cost 15%
Table 2. Vendor Ranking for Written Proposals
Rank Vendor Score
1 Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.72
2 Stay Green, Inc 52
3 BrightView Landscape Services 55
4 JAS Landscapes LLC 48
Based on the bid response, Mariposa Landscapes, Inc of Irwindale, California was determined to
be the most responsive contract providing the best value while meeting the scope of services and
specifications required. Therefore, staff recommends City Council approve award and authorize
the execution of a professional services agreement for LMDs 6R, 9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and
Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance to Mariposa Landscapes Inc., of Irwindale,
California, effective October 1, 2025 for a one-year term with an option to renew in one (1) year
increments up to a total of six (6) additional years, in an amount not to exceed $772,181 for FY
2025/26, and an estimated $6,099,017 over seven years, contingent upon approval of future
budgets.
The chart below has been prepared to illustrate the estimated annual funding requirements for
the full contract term. Please note, this is only an estimate, and the amounts below could vary.
Fiscal Year Prior Year Costs Est. Annual
Increase (4%)Est. Total Costs
FY 2025/26 Year 1 N/A $772,181
FY 2026/27 $772,181 $30,890 $803,071
FY 2027/28 $803,071 $32,130 $835,201
FY 2028/29 $835,201 $33,410 $868,611
FY 2029/30 $868,611 $34,750 $903,361
FY 2030/31 $903,361 $36,140 $939,501
FY 2031/32 $939,501 $37,590 $977,091
Estimated Grand Total $6,099,017
A copy of the proposed agreement is attached hereto.
Page 314
Page 3
3
0
0
9
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved FY 25/26 Budget includes funding for LMDs 6R, 9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and
Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance in accounts F136 CC319 SC2105, F139
CC319 SC2105, and F140 CC319 SC2105.
The contract spending limit of $772,181 includes a contingency of $36,770 for unforeseen work
resulting from wind events or other emergencies.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, while providing high quality outdoor spaces.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Proposed Agreement
Page 315
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC.
FOR
LMDS 6R, 9, 10 PARKWAY, PASEO, AND MEDIAN
ISLAND LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE
SERVICES
AWARD DATE: September 3, 2025
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-116
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 316
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of October 2025, by
and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Mariposa
Landscapes Inc., a corporation (“Contractor”).
RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following
services: LMDs 6R, 9, and 10 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and
Irrigation Maintenance (RFP 25/26-003) (“the Project”).
B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital
“A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City desires to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set forth
and more fully described herein.
D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the
State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and
professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual
promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Contractor’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in this Agreement, City hereby engages Contractor to perform all services described in Recitals
“A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to landscape and irrigation maintenance; all as
more fully set forth in RFP 25/56-003, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Contractor’s proposal, dated
June 11, 2025 attached hereto as Exhibit B, and Schedule of Lump Sum and Unit Costs attached
hereto as Exhibit C, hereinafter entitled “Scope of Work”, and incorporated by reference herein.
The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth
in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any
inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City the Contractor will
promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City.
Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by
amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Contractor’s
compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2025-116
Page 317
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 2
cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in
Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this
Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and
care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as
set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “N/A”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this
Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the
services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that
it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor
represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated
and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the
services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions
attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that
Contractor, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work,
as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Contractor
discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of
services, Contractor shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at
Contractor’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall become effective as of the
date of the mutual execution by way of both party’s signature (the “Effective Date”) through June
30, 2026. No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement
has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of
six (6) additional years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Prior to
entering into an agreement for an annual extension the Contractor may request a Cost-of-living
Increase in an amount not to exceed the increase in the March index of the Consumer Price Index
All Urban Consumers for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California area published by the
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Options to renew are contingent upon the
City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance with all Terms and
Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit C,
provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exceed
seven hundred and seventy-two thousand, one hundred eighty-one dollars ($772,181) for
services during the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, including all out-of-pocket expenses,
unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City shall not
Page 318
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 3
withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not
more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected
in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services
not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with
Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate
Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit C.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services
performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered
during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice
claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior
authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing within ten
(10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records
maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit
by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract
administrator and City representative shall be Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services
Director, or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It
shall be Contractor’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the
progress of the performance of the services, and Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be
made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City
required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.
5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Terry
Noriega, President, is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor
authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions
in connection therewith (“Contractor’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the
experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Contractor’s Representative were a
substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Contractor’s
Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities
Page 319
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 4
of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder.
Contractor may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Contractor’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Contractor or under Contractor’s direct
supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by
State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license
as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the
standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By
its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section
3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for
Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that
Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
Services.
6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected
officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims,
costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor’s violations of personnel
practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset
against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City
from Contractor as a result of Contractor’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or
indemnification arising under this Section 6.
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings,
photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided
by Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and
proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are
considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made,
and provided Contractor is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain
the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic
survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor
under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Contractor. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its
Page 320
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 5
representative, Contractor shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances
shall Contractor fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications
to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between
Contractor and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This
covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for
any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this
Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor
shall be deemed to grant and assign to City , and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign
to City , all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other
intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself,
and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to
the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any
and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding
to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Contractor warrants and represents that it has
secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or
component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used
in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced
under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the
Work Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in
any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any
contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall
bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked
documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the
Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work
Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Contractor, at its
expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of
any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so
that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Contractor is, and shall at all times remain
as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Contractor shall have no power to incur any debt,
obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any
of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s employees,
except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent
that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Contractor
shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contractor under this Agreement, and to defend,
indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest
asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this
Page 321
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 6
Agreement. Contractor shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding
Contractor and Contractor’s employees
9. Confidentiality. Contractor may have access to financial, accounting, statistical,
and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Contractor covenants that all data,
documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Contractor or provided for
performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contractor without
prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires
disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement.
Contractor’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This
provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall
it restrict the Contractor from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to
provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary
for the Contractor to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire
any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in
any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that, in
performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it.
Furthermore, Contractor shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict
in any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor shall not accept any employment
or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor
“financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any
decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained.
10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any
person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit
or obtain this Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other
than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift,
percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon
any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute
discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums
payable to Contractor hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage
or gift.
10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any
interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this
transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge
of Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately
make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be
deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1.
Page 322
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 7
11. Indemnification.
11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers,
and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively,
“Indemnitees”), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses,
reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims
relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to,
or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its officers,
employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement.
Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such
Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual
attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification
obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this
Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for
Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees.
11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights
that they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with
City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.
11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided
in this Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it,
hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of
their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or
operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor.
11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of
the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have
under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover
under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive
in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and
effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or
damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services
hereunder by Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
Page 323
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 8
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial
General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate
limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit
shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate
for bodily injury or disease and Workers’ Compensation Insurance
in the amount required by law.
(4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the
greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the
Contractor; or (ii) the minimum Insurance coverages and limits
shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the
specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a
given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made
that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are
sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this
agreement.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the
limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any
required insurance policy and endorsements.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally
insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials, as additional
Page 324
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 9
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by
or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of
Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor;
and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
Contractor. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope
of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees,
designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable
to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor’s insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers,
officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials. Any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials shall be in excess of
Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the
required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of
the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self-
insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or
reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall
forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should
Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as
specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may
procure such insurance at Contractor’s sole cost and expense.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive
the insurer’s right of subrogation against City, its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers,
and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City
officials.
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in
writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in
the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according
to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting
Page 325
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 10
or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of
warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided.
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or
defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and
attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any
policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements,
or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals
applicable to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or
copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this
Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s Compensation
waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page
listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the
insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and
approved by the City before Contractor commences performance. If performance of this
Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City with the required policies
or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration
of any required policies of insurance.
12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors
performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this
Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the
scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound
to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City
pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same
provisions in its contract with any sub-subcontractor.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Contractor’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall render any
reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Contractor
for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time
for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event
City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Contractor for any services
satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Contractor is not
then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City by reason of
such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following
a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on
the breaching party.
Page 326
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 11
Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days
prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term
of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the
conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties
to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such
changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered
by hand or overnight courier service during Contractor’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b)
on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the
addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to
time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: Maritza Martinez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Public Works Services Department
8794 Lion Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Contractor: Terry Noriega, President
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc.
6332 Santos Diaz Street
Irwindale, CA, 91702
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance
of this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or
applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national
origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.
Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed,
and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed,
religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any
interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor’s obligations
hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by
Contractor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder
shall be null, void and of no effect.
18. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state
and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the
Page 327
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 12
Services. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq.,
and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.,
(“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and compliance
with other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being
performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the
Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully
comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations
can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm Contractor shall make
copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker
needed to execute the Services, available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies
at the Contractor’s principal place of business and at the Project site. Contractor shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless
from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the
Prevailing Wage Laws.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one
or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other
condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any
payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant,
or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment
by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to
such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence
any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement
are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the
express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by
reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this
Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue
for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the
interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by
any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the
uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of
the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other
documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is
Page 328
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 13
incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated
agreement between Contractor and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written
negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any
provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers
to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Vendor Name
By:
Name Date
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Name Date
Title Title
By:
Name Date
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
Page 329
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 14
ATTACHMENTS
• Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations
• Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations
• Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
Page 330
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 15
Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations
Page 331
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 16
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations
Page 332
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 17
Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
Page 333
Vendor Initials
PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor)
Last Revised: 05/22/14
Page 18
SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of Work Contents:
• Exhibit A – RFP 25/26-003
• Exhibit B – Contractor’s proposal, dated June 11, 2025
• Exhibit C – Unit Costs
Page 334
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”) #25/26-003
FOR
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE LMD 6R, 9 & 10 PARKWAYS, PASEOS AND MEDIANS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Page 335
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 60
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 6
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 6
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................. 6
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 7
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 7
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 7
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 7
1.7. BRAND NAMES ......................................................................................................................................... 8
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 8
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 8
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 9
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 9
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE ...................................................................................................................................... 9
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES ................................................................................................................................. 10
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES .................................................................................................................................... 10
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT................................................................................................................................ 11
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 11
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 12
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH ................................................................................................. 12
3.4. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .............................................................................................................. 12
3.5. PROJECT TEAM ........................................................................................................................................ 13
3.6. STAFFING LEVELS ..................................................................................................................................... 13
3.7. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 13
3.8. PROPOSAL RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................... 14
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.10. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 14
3.11. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 14
3.12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 14
Page 336
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 60
3.13. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 15
3.14. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 15
3.15. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 15
3.16. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 15
3.17. COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 15
3.18. LINE-ITEM PRICING .................................................................................................................................. 16
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................... 16
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 16
4.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................................................. 17
4.2.1. EXAMINATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATION, AND SITE OF WORK .................................................................. 17
4.2.2. CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... 17
4.2.3. COMPETENCY OF VENDOR ................................................................................................................... 17
4.2.4. CONTRACT TERM ............................................................................................................................... 17
4.2.5. BONDS ............................................................................................................................................. 17
4.2.6. SUPERVISION AND STAFF ..................................................................................................................... 17
4.2.7. PREVAILING WAGE ............................................................................................................................ 18
4.2.8. COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 18
4.2.9. NON-RESPONSIVENESS OF CONTRACTOR ............................................................................................... 19
4.2.10. SERVICE LEVELS ................................................................................................................................. 19
4.2.11. SCHEDULING OF WORK ....................................................................................................................... 19
4.2.12. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ........................................................................................................... 20
4.2.13. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................................................................................................ 20
4.2.14. DEDUCTIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 21
4.2.15. DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE – NOTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ........................................................ 23
4.2.16. WORK SITES ..................................................................................................................................... 24
4.2.17. ADDITIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 25
4.2.18. QUALITY OF WORK ............................................................................................................................ 25
4.2.19. INSPECTIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 25
4.2.20. REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & CITY PROPERTY.................................................................... 25
4.2.21. UTILITY BILLS .................................................................................................................................... 26
Page 337
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 60
4.2.22. CONFORMING TO STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION .................... 26
4.2.23. PERMITS .......................................................................................................................................... 26
4.3. WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL ................................................................................................................. 26
4.3.1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PERMIT .................................................................................................................. 26
4.3.2. SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND DELINEATORS ................................................................................................ 26
4.3.3. TRAINING ......................................................................................................................................... 27
4.3.4. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE..................................................................................................................... 27
4.3.5. TURF MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................................... 27
4.3.6. SHRUB, GROUNDCOVER, DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) AND VINE MAINTENANCE ........................................ 30
4.3.7. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE (EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREIN, PAYMENT FOR ALL IRRIGATION WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED
IN THE TURF AND GROUNDCOVER LINE ITEMS.) ....................................................................................................... 39
4.3.8. PEST CONTROL .................................................................................................................................. 42
4.3.9. DEBRIS AND TRASH REMOVAL ............................................................................................................. 44
4.3.10. DRAINS (ALL SERVICE LEVELS) ............................................................................................................. 45
4.3.11. CLEAN-UP (ALL SERVICE LEVELS) .......................................................................................................... 45
4.3.12. HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................ 46
4.3.13. TRAIL MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................................................... 46
4.3.14. MULCHSCAPE MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................. 46
4.3.15. TRASH RECEPTACLE MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 47
4.3.16. STORM DEBRIS CLEANUP .................................................................................................................... 48
4.4. EXTRA WORK .......................................................................................................................................... 48
5. EVALUATION AND VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS .............................................................................................. 49
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 49
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 49
5.3. COST EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................... 49
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS .................................................................................................................................. 49
5.5. PRESENTATIONS / ORAL BOARD INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................... 50
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................... 50
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER ............................................................................................................................. 50
5.8. VENDOR SELECTION ................................................................................................................................. 51
Page 338
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 60
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 51
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” ........ 52
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” ............................................. 53
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” .................................................................................... 54
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ....................................................................................... 55
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” ............................................................ 56
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ......................................................................................................... 57
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ................................................................................................... 58
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET ...................................................................................................... 59
Page 339
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 60
1. OVERVIEW
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Vendors (hereinafter “Vendor”) to submit
a proposal response for Request for Proposals (“RFP”) #25/26-003 for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance
LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos And Medians in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services and
Specifications indicated herein.
Vendors wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Vendor on Planet Bids through the
City website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement. Only those responses received from
registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Vendor that has downloaded
the RFP. Submitting a response under a Vendor name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list
will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration.
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete RFP responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified
in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be
responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post RFP April 21, 2025
Questions Due May 8, 2025, by 9:00 am
Addendum Issued May 15, 2026
RFP Response Due Date June 11, 2025, by 9:00 am
Evaluation Process June 16 – 24, 2025
Short List Letter Issued June 26, 2025
Oral Board & Presentation TBD
Letter of Intent to Award TBD
Contract Award Date TBD
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Vendor.)
Page 340
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 60
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Vendors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any
part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears no
responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP
and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP.
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This RFP should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Proposal in
accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP
responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the
RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify
your RFP response submittal. Vendors must submit signed RFP responses by the due date and time as specified
herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this RFP and
any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the
requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City
has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement
signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the
due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in
the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the
above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this RFP until a Vendor is awarded, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with
any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site
visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
All materials submitted in response to this RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be
returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Vendor submitting the RFP response. A copy of the
RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Vendor considers
Page 341
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 60
as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act
may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or otherwise.
1.7. BRAND NAMES
Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not
restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFP responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality
specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFP response clearly describes the article
offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Vendor specifies otherwise, it is understood that
the Vendor is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to
determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand
name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample.
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Vendor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to
ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all
requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or
instructions will be at the Vendor’s sole risk.
Vendors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and in
this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide
notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Vendors by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however, it is
the Vendor’s responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFP due
date.
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the
City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
• Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure.
• Reject any or all RFPs.
• Reissue a Request for RFPs.
• Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including
deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment,
or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs.
• The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service,
and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response.
Page 342
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 60
• The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with
any or all responsive and responsible Vendors who submit RFP responses.
• Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means.
• Determine that no project will be pursued.
• The City reserves the right to inspect the Vendor’s place of business prior to award or at any time
during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Vendor’s capabilities and
qualifications.
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, Public records
are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right
to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall
be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted
by law.
Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this
RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or
omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty
to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public
Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary, or exempt, and state the legal basis
for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information
is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for
the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public
disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal
basis to do so.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Vendor awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no
later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected
Vendor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties
required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout
the term of the Contract.
Page 343
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 60
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES
Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the
provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected Vendor(s)
shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an exemption from
the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code § 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC
§ 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this RFP that such an exemption will apply or that
prevailing wages will not be required for a scope of work covered by this RFP.
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Vendor require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in
this RFP, the awarded Vendor will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right,
title, or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Vendor to so assign, transfer,
or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
The awarded Vendor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged
in performing the Services including Vendors subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded
Vendor or under the awarded Vendor’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Vendor shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits
and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation,
unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Vendor certifies that it is
aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured
against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of
that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
In case of default by the Vendor, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited
to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and may
deduct from unpaid balance due to the Vendor, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the
City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of
payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Vendors for
delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Vendor.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall
be__________________, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall
be the Vendor’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the
Page 344
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 60
performance of the services, and the Vendor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City-to-City
Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the
approval of the City Representative.
Vendor Representative:
The response to this RFP shall designate the representative of the Vendor authorized to act in its behalf with
respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Vendor’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the
Vendor’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the Vendor.
Therefore, the Vendor’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement for directing all
activities of Vendor and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful
Vendor may not change the Vendor’s Representative without the prior written approval of City ’s
Representative.
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Vendor personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being
conducted. While on City property, the Vendor’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no
circumstances shall the Vendor’s or Vendor’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City.
Vendor or Vendor’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City.
Vendor's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when
interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Vendor's personnel shall be required to
work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Vendors, and the public. Nothing
contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Vendor the sole right to supply personal or contractual
services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order.
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this RFP form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and
evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely Vendors must comply with the format and submission
requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation
process.
If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with
an RFP review and negotiations.
Page 345
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 60
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
RFP responses must include a cover letter including the Vendors business name and address of Vendor and the
name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. The cover
letter shall condense and highlight the contents of the Vendor’s RFP response to provide the Evaluation
Committee with a broad understanding of the Vendor’s approach, proposal, experience, and staffing. A
signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be
considered confirmation of the Vendor’s ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This
section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by
sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the RFP response will be separated
by a title page at the beginning of each section.
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
Outline the Vendor’s understanding of the project and any potential challenges or delays you foresee and ways
to overcome these challenges. Describe the Vendor’s proposed approach to the scope of services listed in this
RFP. Include a full, detailed task breakdown that outlines assumptions and deliverables clearly for each task.
Vendors may include options or enhancements to the scope of work for the City’s consideration.
3.4. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
To be considered for this project, the Vendor must have a minimum of five (5) years of experience developing,
fully implementing, and/or performing similar Scope of Work. The Vendor shall demonstrate their qualifications,
experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide an overview of the
Vendor’s qualifications and experience, including.
• The number of years in business, main business focus, locations that will primarily support the project.
• If the Company is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed
solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services.
• A statement as to whether your Company is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or
private nonprofit Company, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
• Five projects with a similar scope of work completed within the last five years. Must include the project
scope of work, Vendor’s team members that worked on the project, and timeline of the project delivery.
• The Vendor shall provide additional information as necessary for the City to consider in the evaluation
of the submitted proposal.
RFP responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be
submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFP responses will be accepted. RFP responses must include
the information required by this RFP. There is no maximum page limit for this RFP.
Page 346
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13 of 60
3.5. PROJECT TEAM
This section should introduce the key staff that the Company commits to the project. A proposed Organization
Chart shall be included. Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the City.
Resumes shall include the following information:
• Project Role,
• Length of time with the Company,
• Years of Experience,
• Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described
herein,
• Educational background,
• Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein,
• Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
3.6. STAFFING LEVELS
The vendor shall complete and submit Schedule IV, Labor Hours by Month and Job Classification. The completed
Schedule IV shall list the minimum labor hours by Month and Job Classification the vendor will provide, if a
contract is awarded, to complete the routine services at the frequencies specified herein. Provision of the
minimum number labor hours shall not relieve the vendor of the responsibility to complete the regularly
scheduled maintenance tasks at the frequencies specified in these specifications.
“Extra work” projects shall require the assignment of additional staff. Staff assigned to “extra work” projects
shall not be counted toward the minimum labor hours proposed for the routine, cyclical, services.
Failure to submit Schedule IV will deem the vendor’s proposal response to be considered non-responsive and
will not move forward in the evaluation process.
3.7. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Vendor intends to subcontract any portion of the work, a detailed list of any subcontractors, partners, or
third-party Vendors who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services should be included in
this section. Information provided on subcontractors Vendors shall include:
• Description of subcontractor’s role in the project.
• Description of the Vendor’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors,
• Resumes with the same format as specified above for the key team members of the subcontracting
team,
Page 347
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14 of 60
• Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and
telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this RFP.
3.8. PROPOSAL RESPONSE
Under this section Vendors shall provide a full, detailed response to the City ’s Scope of Services listed herein.
Vendors should be as thorough as possible in their response as it may be the only opportunity to convey
information regarding your business, ability, and qualifications to complete the services needed.
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet
Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G and Exhibit H. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem your RFP submittal as non-responsive.
3.10. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed
“Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.11. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Vendor will be required to enter
into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City ’s bid
system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Vendor and signed by
both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general provisions
which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Vendor will be deemed to have
agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services Agreement Exceptions
Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the PSA language in writing.
Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to
any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G”.
3.12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Vendors must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to
comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of Insurance
Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The awarded Vendor
will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the
Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Vendor, will not be
Page 348
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15 of 60
accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types,
Exhibits A – G.
3.13. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Vendor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Vendor’s
responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been
posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become
part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. Vendors must indicate their acknowledgement of
any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted
under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.14. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Bidding Vendors must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Vendor Certification Form” that they are not
listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the
guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689
(3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax
delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response
Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.15. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Vendors shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet Bid
Response Types, Exhibits A – G. This will indicate a Vendors agreement to or not to allow other entities to utilize
the RFP response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
3.16. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Unsigned RFP responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Vendor has carefully
examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and hereby
proposes and agrees, if the Vendors RFP response is accepted, Vendor agrees to furnish all material in
accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit cost amounts
set forth in the Vendors RFP response.
3.17. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are
being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years.
“Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the
“Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your RFP
Page 349
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16 of 60
response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit
H” in Planet Bids.
3.18. LINE-ITEM PRICING
Line-item pricing for this RFP must be provided directly in the Planet Bids system under the “Line Items” tab.
This pricing is not an estimate and is Company fixed price for each item listed. Vendors pricing quotes outside
of the pricing listed in Planet Bids under the “Line Items” tab will not be accepted or considered for award. Any
additional cost required should be noted in the additional cost line item and a summary of the cost provided in
the notes section of the line item. While line-item pricing accompanies your RFP response it is not to be
discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. The City will not
be obligated to any estimated pricing or pricing not identified in the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. Failure to
provide the required line-Item pricing in the required format will cause Vendors RFP response to be considered
as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Any questions or clarifications
regarding how to correctly submit line-Item pricing should be submitted by the “Questions Due” date and time
indicated in the schedule of events.
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The scope of work is complete, continuous, consistent, and safe landscape and irrigation maintenance of the
designated areas that are specified herein. During, and at the end of the contract period, all plant material shall
be in a healthy, growing condition and all irrigation systems will be in the proper state of repair and adjustment.
The contractor shall provide all equipment, labor, and materials necessary for performing landscape and
irrigation maintenance according to the specifications herein.
The intent and purpose of this agreement is to provide a level of maintenance to the areas such that each will
present a safe, pleasing, and desirable appearance within the limitations of the contracted service levels. The
contractor agrees to maintain all the designated areas covered by this Agreement at such levels. The Public
Works Services Director, or their designated representative, shall be the sole judge as to the adequacy and
quality of maintenance.
The work shall be done in accordance with City Standard Plans and “The ‘Green Book’ Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction” 2021 edition including subsequent amendments, supplements and/or additions.
Copies are available from the publisher, Building News, Incorporated, 1612 So. Clementine Street, Anaheim,
California, 92802, telephone (714) 517-0970.
Where the Public Works Services Director is mentioned in these Special Provisions, it shall be noted that their
designated representative may act in their behalf regarding administration of this agreement.
Page 350
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17 of 60
4.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.2.1. EXAMINATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATION, AND SITE OF WORK
Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the work site, plans, specifications, and other
contract documents, and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions,
requirements and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No bidder shall at any time after
submission of a proposal make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of
information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the satisfactory completion of the job. Any
errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the specifications, or other contract documents shall be called to
the attention of the City and clarified prior to the submission of proposals.
4.2.2. CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor’s licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to,
a Class A (General Engineering Contractor) or a Class C-27 (Landscape Contractor); in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and
rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded.
4.2.3. COMPETENCY OF VENDOR
The bidder shall be licensed under the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 9 of the Business and Professions Code
of the State of California to do the type of work contemplated in the contract and shall be skilled and regularly
engaged in the general class or type of work called for under this contract.
4.2.4. CONTRACT TERM
The Contract Term shall be from the date of mutual execution and shall remain in full force through June 30,
2026. Parties to any contract resulting from this RFP shall have the option to renew the Contract Term in one
(1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years.
4.2.5. BONDS
If a contract is awarded, the Contractor shall furnish a Labor and Materials Bond in a sum equal to 100% of the
contract price, as required by the provisions of Section 9554 of the California Civil Code.
4.2.6. SUPERVISION AND STAFF
The contractor shall assign an account manager to be on site each working day, working regular working hours,
for the duration of this contract. Regular working hours for the purposes of this section regarding the account
manager shall be Monday through Friday for eight hours per day dedicated to this contract. The contractor and
his staff shall have skills, expertise, and experience in arboriculture, turf management, pest control, soils,
Page 351
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18 of 60
fertilizers, plant identification and irrigation systems maintenance. The account manager must be fluent in the
English language. The account manager shall be thoroughly knowledgeable of the provisions of this contract.
The contractor shall have on staff a full-time Water Auditor certified by the Irrigation Association (I.A.) or
California Landscape Contractors Association (C.L.C.A.) as a Landscape Irrigation Auditor available to perform
water audits, system checks, and irrigation scheduling as directed by the Public Works Services Director.
4.2.7. PREVAILING WAGE
Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter
1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department
of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates
of per diem wages.
This contract is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
For all new contracts awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors shall furnish
electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner.
Each Contractor or Subcontractor shall preserve his weekly payroll records for a period of three (3) years. The
payroll records shall set out accurately and completely the name, address, social security number, occupational
classification, and hourly wage rate of each employee, hours worked by him during the payroll period, and full
weekly wages earned by him, any deductions made from such weekly wages, and the actual weekly wages paid
to him.
Such payroll records shall be made available for inspection by the City or its authorized representatives.
In addition to the foregoing payroll reporting and retention requirements, the Contractor and each of his
subcontractors shall prepare payrolls on forms prescribed and in accordance with instructions furnished by the
City. The Contractor shall deliver to the City a certified and legible copy of each payroll with the routine monthly
invoices.
Payment will not be made prior to the submission to the City of certified payrolls prepared in accordance with
Labor Code section 1776.
4.2.8. COMMUNICATIONS
The Contractor shall provide a cellular telephone to each account manager. Each account manager shall always
carry the telephone on their person during the workday for communication with the City representative. Each
Page 352
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19 of 60
account manager shall be on call 24 hours per day, seven days per week, for emergencies within the contract
areas.
4.2.9. NON-RESPONSIVENESS OF CONTRACTOR
Failure of the Contractor or the account managers to respond immediately (within 1 hour) to the telephone
notification by the Public Works Services Director of an emergency condition, or failure of the Contractor to
respond within two days of written notification by the Public Works Services Director or their representative,
shall give the Public Works Services Director the right to cause necessary work to be performed by City crews,
or other contractors and any costs incurred in so doing shall be deducted from the payment for the month in
which the work was performed.
4.2.10. SERVICE LEVELS
Now, or in the future, the City may have severe budget constraints within one or more of the funding sources
to which this Contract applies. As a result, and at any time, the City may choose to contract for maintenance of
the affected sites at less than the originally contracted service level for any, or all landscape services as described
herein. Adjustments to the service level may apply to all sites covered by the contract, or a subset thereof, as
needed to meet budgetary constraints. The City will notify the Contractor in writing fifteen (15) calendar days
prior to service level adjustments.
4.2.11. SCHEDULING OF WORK
The Contractor shall accomplish all normal landscape maintenance required under this contract between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Exceptions may be made to normal working hours,
where incidence of use may be too great during the hours specified to allow for proper maintenance. The Public
Works Services Director or their representative may grant, on an individual basis, permission to perform
contract maintenance at other hours including weekends. No maintenance functions that generate excessive
noise that would cause annoyance to residents of the area shall commence before 8:00 a.m. Monday through
Saturday and 9:00 am on Sundays. Unless otherwise specified by the Public Works Services Director, the
Contractor shall supply the City with a bi-weekly schedule of routine work (the Maintenance Schedule Chart) to
be followed in the performance of any work required by these specifications. Said schedule shall be submitted
by the contractor five working days prior to the start date listed on the schedule. Any changes in scheduling
shall be immediately reported, in writing, to the Public Works Services Director.
The Public Works Services Director will be notified in writing at least 24 hours in advance of each start date of
non-routine maintenance operations including, but not limited to, fertilization, chemical application and tree
pruning.
Page 353
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20 of 60
4.2.12. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Assembly Bill 73. The law states that, "every person
planning to conduct any excavation is required to contract a regional notification center at least 2 working days
prior to excavation." Assembly Bill 73 defines excavation as, "any operation in which earth, rock, or other
material in the ground is moved, removed, or otherwise displaced by means of tools, equipment, or explosives
in any of the following ways: grading, trenching, digging, ditching, drilling, auguring, tunneling, scraping, cable
or pipe lowing and driving, or any other way." The Contractor shall assume all liability incurred from any type
of excavation performed at the worksite.
4.2.13. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
a) The Contractor will be paid monthly based upon the unit cost and lump sum amounts listed in the cost
proposal.
b) The unit and lump sum prices to be paid shall be full compensation for the items of work and all
appurtenant work, including furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals.
c) Unless specifically excluded herein, payment for all items of work, including, but not limited to, the work
listed in section 4.26, Routine Maintenance, shall be included in the proposed price for the following line
items dependent on the contracted service level for each site:
a. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level A for Groundcover
b. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level A for Turf
c. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level A for Hardscape
d. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level A for Mulchscape
e. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level B for Groundcover
f. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level B for Turf
g. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level B for Hardscape
h. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level B for Mulchscape
i. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level C for Groundcover
j. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level C for Turf
k. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level C for Hardscape
l. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level C for Mulchscape
m. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level D for Groundcover
n. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level D for Turf
Page 354
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 60
o. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level D for Hardscape
p. Continuous Parkway Maintenance at Service Level D for Mulchscape
d) The Estimated Annual Quantity given in the proposal is approximate, being given as a basis for the
comparison of bids only, and the City does not, expressly or by implication, agree that the actual amount
of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class
or portion of the work, or to omit any portion of the work, as may be deemed advisable or necessary by
the Public Works Services Director.
e) Whenever the Contractor is required to perform work or furnish equipment, labor, tools, and materials
of any class for which no price is fixed in the Proposal, it shall be understood that such work, equipment,
labor, tools, and material shall be provided without extra charge, allowance, or direct payment of any
kind. The cost of performing such work or furnishing such equipment, labor, tools, and materials shall
be included in the unit bid prices in the proposal and no additional compensation will be made,
therefore.
f) On or about the first day of each month, the Contractor shall present an invoice for the previous month
for the contracted monthly amount. The invoice shall include the account number for each and the
purchase order number for this contract.
g) Included with the monthly and/or material invoices will be notations of the routine work functions
accomplished during that period that occur on frequencies greater than one month, e.g. quarterly or
semi-annually, such as fertilization in accordance with Schedule I, chemical application. The quantity
invoiced and paid shall be the total square feet shown in the Bid except that the Public Works Services
Director shall have the right to increase or decrease the total quantity based upon documented field
measurements.
h) The Public Works Services Director will make payment monthly after verification of completion. Sites
which, in the opinion of the Public Works Services Director, have not been maintained in accordance
with the Contract Special Provisions will be deducted from the monthly payment in accordance with
section 4.15, Deductions.
i) Extra work shall be separately invoiced in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices provided in
the supplementary "Extra Work Schedule" of the contract bid.
j) Draft extra work reports per Maintenance District should be delivered to the Public Works Services
Director prior to invoice preparation. The purpose of which is to expedite the invoicing and payment
process, and to approve the work for completion and payment.
4.2.14. DEDUCTIONS
Deductions from monthly payments shall be divided into three categories: Performance on Schedule, Deficient
Performance and Non-Performance.
Page 355
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 60
Payment deductions shall not be construed a penalty but as adjustment of payment to the Contractor for only
the work performed, or as the cost to the City for inspection and other related costs from failure of the
Contractor to complete the work according to schedule.
a) Performance on schedule
Failure of the Contractor to timely perform will result in additional inspection and administrative costs
being incurred by the City.
The sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per site may be deducted from payments to the Contractor
for each calendar day where an item of work is not completed in accordance with the bi-weekly schedule
submitted pursuant to Section 4.12. This deduction applies individually to each scheduled task or subtask
listed herein that is not completed in accordance with the bi-weekly schedule.
The maximum deduction per month for “Performance on Schedule” shall be equal to fifty percent (50%)
of the total monthly contract price for routine maintenance.
Deductions for “Performance on Schedule” are, at the City’s option, in addition to or in lieu of other
remedies provided herein.
b) Deficient Performance
Level of Maintenance: In the judgment of the City, if the level of maintenance is less than that specified
herein, the City shall, at its option, in addition to or in lieu of other remedies provided herein, withhold
appropriate payment from the Contractor until services are rendered in accordance with specifications
set forth within this document.
The contractor is required to correct deficiencies within the time specified by the City. If noted deficient
work has not been completed, payment for subject deficiency shall be deducted during the current
billing period and shall continue to be deducted in subsequent billing periods until deficiency is
corrected, without right to retroactive payments. The amount to be withheld per deficient site shall be
the amount paid for the entire site.
Minimum Manpower: Failure of the Contractor to comply with minimum required manpower, as listed
in Schedule IV, Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 submitted with the proposal, shall result in a deficiency deduction.
The deduction shall be calculated by the following formula:
(Labor Hours Proposed - Labor Hours Provided) ÷ Labor Hours Provided × Monthly Rate = Deduction
Example:
Labor Hours Proposed: 100
Labor Hours Provided: 80
Monthly Rate: $1,000
(100-80) ÷ 100 × $1,000 = $200 Deduction
Page 356
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 60
Other deficiencies: Examples include, but are not limited to, failure to comply with conditions,
specifications, reports, schedules and/or directives from the Public Works Services Director. Any such
deficiency will result in a deficiency deduction of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per instance per
working day.
The maximum cumulative deduction per month for “Deficient Performance” shall be equal to the sum
of the monthly fees for all locations.
Deductions for “Deficient Performance” are, at the City’s option, in addition to or in lieu of other
remedies provided herein.
c) Non-Performance
Schedules: Failure to provide bi-weekly schedules in compliance with the contract specifications may
result in a deficiency deduction of fifty Dollars ($50) per calendar day.
Reports: Failure to provide reports in compliance with the contract specifications may result in a
deficiency deduction of fifty Dollars ($50) per calendar day.
Notifications: Failure to provide notifications to in compliance with the Contract Specifications may
result in a deficiency deduction of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per instance.
4.2.15. DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE – NOTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
a) The Contractor shall be notified both verbally and in writing, each time its performance is unsatisfactory
and corrective action is necessary.
b) Upon notification of deficient performance, the Contractor will be immediately subject to the deductions
listed in Section 4.15. Deductions.
c) The Contractor shall complete corrective action within the following time frames following notification:
a. Weekly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Weekly Duties shall be corrected during the first working day
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed during the first working day following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
b. Bi-Weekly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Bi-Weekly Duties shall be corrected within two working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within two working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
Page 357
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 60
waived.
c. Monthly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Monthly Duties shall be corrected within four working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within four working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
d. Bi-Monthly Duties
i. Deficient performance of Bi-Monthly Duties shall be corrected within eight working days
following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within eight working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
e. Quarterly, Semi-Annual, and Annual Duties
i. Deficient performance of Quarterly, Semi-Annual, and Annual Duties shall be corrected
within ten working days following notification of deficiency.
ii. If corrective work is completed within ten working days following notification of
deficiency, the deductions outlined in Section 4.15.b, Deficient Performance, shall be
waived.
4.2.16. WORK SITES
LMD 6R: The boundaries of the district are generally described as north of I-210, south of Banyan Street, west
of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries
also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 and 13858 west of Milliken
Avenue. See map in Appendix B for exact LMD boundaries and site locations. The site descriptions for LMD 6R
are in Schedule III.
LMD 9: The boundaries of the district are generally described as that area of the City known as Lower Etiwanda,
which is generally bounded by I-210 to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the west, Foothill Boulevard to the south
and East Avenue to the east. See map in Appendix B for exact LMD boundaries and site locations. The site
descriptions for LMD 9 are in Schedule III.
LMD 10: The boundaries of the district are generally described as that area of the City known as Rancho
Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by I-210 on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west, the Southern
California Edison powerlines on the north and Blue Grass on the east. See map in Appendix B for exact LMD
boundaries and site locations. The site descriptions for LMD 10 are in Schedule III.
Page 358
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 60
Reference is also made to the maps included in Appendix B.
4.2.17. ADDITIONS
During the term of the contract, landscapes may be added to or deleted from this contract. In addition, sites
may be modified, or the landscape area audited, and the inventory adjusted accordingly. The Contractor will be
given no less than fifteen (15) calendar days’ notice prior to any changes to the inventory and pay quantities.
Further, the Contractor may have the option of accompanying the City inspector on final inspection, prior to
acceptance of the site, to comment about the condition of the site. Payment shall be adjusted based on the
unit costs listed in the proposal.
4.2.18. QUALITY OF WORK
All work shall be performed in accordance with the service level for which the work is contracted, and the best
irrigation and landscape maintenance practices shall be implemented to provide aesthetically pleasing, healthy
and safe parkways, paseos and medians. The Public Works Services Director or his representative shall be the
sole judge as to the adequacy and quality of maintenance.
All materials, equipment and supplies used to repair and maintain devises and materials pursuant to the
specifications for LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE FOR LMD 6R, LMD 9, AND LMD 10 PARKWAYS,
PASEOS AND MEDIANS shall meet current City standards for the individual landscape sites.
4.2.19. INSPECTIONS
Scheduled on a specific day of the week and on a semi-monthly basis during the middle of the month, the
Contractor or their representative will walk and/or drive the project with the Public Works Services Director or
their representative for the purpose of determining compliance with the specifications or to discuss required
work. Any specific problem area which does not meet the conditions of the specifications set forth herein shall
be called to the attention of the Contractor and, if not corrected within the timeframes listed in section 4.16(c),
shall be deducted in accordance with Section 4-15, Deductions.
4.2.20. REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & CITY PROPERTY
The Contractor shall be responsible for replacement of dead plants, City property, and any other items deemed
necessary due to contractor negligence. This includes (but is not limited to) trees, shrubs, and turf damaged by
untrained or negligent equipment operators, fencing damaged by mower operator negligence, or the failure of
the contractor to provide water to plant material. This includes sites where the irrigation cannot be repaired
in a reasonable amount of time even in circumstances beyond the contractor’s control. If the irrigation cannot
be repaired in a reasonable amount of time and it is out the contractor’s control, then the contractor shall use
Page 359
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26 of 60
alternative irrigation methods including but not limited to a water tender, station masters, renting hydrant
meters, etc. This type of temporary alternative irrigation shall be approved and paid as an extra by the City.
4.2.21. UTILITY BILLS
The City shall bear all the costs for water and electricity used on the sites covered by this contract as billed on
the regular monthly invoices received by the City from the utility agencies.
4.2.22. CONFORMING TO STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
State and Federal guidelines for storm water pollution prevention are known as Best Management Practices
(BMP’s). These practices will help reduce groundwater contamination and pollution to our wetlands, beaches,
and coastlines. Since Landscaping can and does contribute to storm water pollution, BMP guidelines taken from
the California Storm Water Quality Association’s Handbook are provided for the Contractor’s reference. In
addition, these BMPs shall be reviewed with any new employee before he begins work in the field, and with all
crews on at least an annual basis. (See Appendix C)
4.2.23. PERMITS
Prior to the start of any work, the Contractor shall obtain the applicable City permits and plan for City
inspections. The City will issue the permits at no charge to the Contractor. The Contractor and all subcontractors
shall each obtain a City business license and shall be licensed in accordance with State Business and Professions
Code. The Contractor shall also obtain all other permits, licenses, inspections, certificates, or authorizations
required by any governing body or entity.
4.3. WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
4.3.1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PERMIT
The Contractor shall prepare a permit application for street CLOSURE AND SHALL ATTACH TWO COPIES OF THE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL signing, barricading and/or detour routing. The permit application and
accompanying attachments shall be reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. Upon the Traffic Engineer's approval,
a no-fee Street Closure Permit shall be issued. No Street Closure, Lane Closure, Detour or other work requiring
traffic control shall commence prior to issuance of said permit.
4.3.2. SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND DELINEATORS
The Contractor shall provide and install barricades, delineators, warning devices and construction signs in
accordance with the current California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual (CJUTCM) published by the California
Inter- Utility Coordinating Committee, the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH) and the current
Caltrans Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones unless otherwise approved
by the Engineer. During adverse weather or unusual traffic or working conditions additional traffic devices shall
be placed as directed by the Engineer.
Page 360
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 27 of 60
4.3.3. TRAINING
Upon award of the contract and before work can begin within the public right-of-way, the contractor shall
provide written proof of work zone safety training of all supervisory staff. The contractor will be responsible for
all work zone safety inspections and regular training of all staff setting up any traffic control.
4.3.4. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
See section 4-14 for information on payment for routine maintenance tasks not listed on the cost proposal
sheet.
4.3.5. TURF MAINTENANCE
a) Mowing
The Contractor shall use mulching-type mowers that are approved prior to use by the Public Works Services
Director. An example of the completed work done by each mulching mower must be presented for approval
to the Public Works Services Director. Regardless of the season, the mowing height of tall fescue shall be 2 ½
to 3” unless directed otherwise by the Public Works Services Director. All equipment shall be well maintained,
adjusted properly, and blades shall always be kept sharp.
All turf and adjacent hardscape areas are required to present a neat, clean, and relatively debris free
appearance upon the completion of the mowing project for the day. Since this contract requires the use of
mulching type mowers, this may require that accumulated debris including leaves, trash, tree bark, branches,
twigs, etc. be removed from the turf and surrounding hardscape areas prior to mowing.
Mowing dates shall be set on the Maintenance Schedule Chart to provide the required number of mowings
per year. Work shall be performed on the same day each week. Mowing days will be coordinated with the
City so that, if possible, mowing occurs 1 day prior to street sweeping. Street sweeper schedules will be
provided to the contractor by the City Representative upon request. All mowing missed due to inclement
weather shall be rescheduled within 3 working days on the weekly schedule and within 7 days on the biweekly
schedule. If weather or ground conditions persist, the Public Works Services Director may change the annual
schedule to allow fewer than the required number of mowings per year.
Mowing Frequency
Service Level A - All turf areas shall be mowed once per week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and at least once every other week, or as needed, during the period of
November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap years).
Service Level B - All turf areas shall be mowed once per week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st through February 28th
(February 29th in leap years).
Page 361
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28 of 60
Service Level C - All turf areas shall be mowed every other week during the period of March 1st through
October 31st; and as required during the period November 1st through February 28th
(February 29th in leap years).
Service Level D - All turf areas shall be mowed once per month throughout the year.
b) Edging
All turf grass borders including but not limited to valve boxes, curbs, mow curbs, pads, headers, turf and
planter interfaces without headers, sidewalks, and tree wells, shall be neatly and uniformly edged
concurrently with every mowing. Mechanical methods shall be used except where physically not possible or
practical. Tree wells and valve boxes in turf areas shall be trimmed concurrently with each mowing. Trimming
shall be done in a manner to prevent any damage to the tree trunk. "Arbor-Guards" or approved equal shall
be always kept in place on all tree trunks 4” in diameter or less within turf areas. Bare-soil tree wells are
required in all turf areas and shall be maintained by chemical, not mechanical means.
Edging Frequency
Service Level A - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders once per week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and at least once every other week,
or as needed, during the period of November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in
leap years). In addition, an edger with a metal blade will be required for use on all turf
grass borders at least once per month during the period of March 1st through October
31st.
Service Level B - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders once per week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and as required during the period
November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap years). In addition, an edger
with a metal blade will be required for use on all turf grass borders at least once per
month during the period of March 1st through October 31st.
Service Level C - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders every other week
during the period of March 1st through October 31st; and as required during the period
November 1st through February 28th (February 29th in leap years). An edger with a metal
blade will not be required as part of the turf maintenance program at Service Level C.
Service Level D - Concurrent with mowing, the contractor shall edge all turf grass borders once per month
throughout the year. An edger with a metal blade will not be required as part of the turf
maintenance program at Service Level D.
c) Fertilization
Fertilizer shall be applied in such a manner as to insure uniform coverage with minimum overlap. Turf shall
be free of moisture at the time of application. Application of the fertilizer shall be done in sections coinciding
Page 362
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 60
with the areas covered by the timing stations on the automatic controllers in order that the soil may be
thoroughly moistened immediately after the broadcast of fertilizer.
All damages resulting from the use of unauthorized fertilizers or improper watering after fertilization shall be
repaired or replaced at the expense of the Contractor.
Fertilization Frequency
Service Level A - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
Service Level B - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
Service Level C - The contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule I.
Service Level D - Fertilization of turf areas is not required as part of routine maintenance.
The City may request fertilization in addition to the above-described work. Any additional fertilization
requested requires written pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent and will be paid as
extra work.
d)Aeration
Aeration Frequency
Service Level A - The contractor shall mechanically aerate all turf areas in spring and fall. The contractor
shall use a core type aerator with ½ inch tines or approved equal. The aeration period will
be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart and should be performed prior to
scheduled fertilizing, dethatching, overseeding, or pre-emergent applications. Do not
aerate for at least 3 months following turf pre-emergent applications or as directed on
the pesticide label. In areas where soil conditions are poor, top dressing may be required.
The application of top dressing would be paid as an extra work.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall not be required to aerate turf areas.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall not be required to aerate turf areas.
Service Level D - The Contractor shall not be required to aerate turf areas.
e)Overseeding (Overseeding requires written pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent
and will be paid as extra work.)
All overseeding shall be done with a seed type or blend approved by the Public Works Services Director. The
Contractor shall over seed where needed in such a manner as to insure uniform growth with minimum bare
areas. One month prior to overseeding, the Contractor shall notify the Public Works Services Director for
approval of scope of work.
Page 363
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 30 of 60
Overseeding will be scheduled either in early fall or early spring. Fertilization and overseeding will be
concurrently applied.
Prior to overseeding, the area will be dethatched as required.
Grass seed shall be applied at the rate specified on the label for the type of seed being used. Seed quality
shall meet the following criteria: Minimum purity shall be 98% weed free for all grasses; minimum
germination rate shall be 85% for all grasses; no seed shall be applied without prior verification of seed mix
and quality by the Public Works Services Director.
Once seed has been applied, the contractor shall firm the soil and cover the seed with a high-quality compost
top dressing to prevent erosion and reduce evaporation of soil moisture.
Pre-emergent herbicide applications shall be applied no sooner than three (3) mowings following seed
germination. Overseeding shall not be done within at least four months of any pre-emergent herbicide
application or as directed on the pesticide label – whichever length of time is greater.
4.3.6. SHRUB, GROUNDCOVER, DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG) AND VINE MAINTENANCE
4.3.6.1. SHRUB MAINTENANCE
Note: Shrub maintenance shall be performed at the service level for which ground cover maintenance is
contracted. Payment for shrub maintenance shall be included in the price proposed for groundcover
maintenance.
All shrubs growing in the work areas shall be pruned, as specified herein, to consistently maintain plants in a
healthy, growing condition, and to maintain plant growth within reasonable bounds to prevent encroachment
of passageways, walks, adjacent properties, streets, view of signs, traffic or in any manner deemed
objectionable by the Public Works Services Director. Dead or damaged limbs or branches shall be removed
immediately, and all pruning cuts shall be made cleanly with sharp pruning tools, with no projections or stubs
remaining.
Shrub Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall selectively prune all shrubs whenever required such that each shrub
grows vigorously and healthily without encroaching upon any adjacent area, improved
street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public hazard. Pruning shall be done in a
manner to permit plants to grow naturally in accordance with their normal growth
characteristics. Shearing, hedging or severe pruning of plants, unless authorized by the
Public Works Services Director or his representative, shall not be permitted.
The Contractor shall fertilize the entire shrub planter twice per year in the spring and fall
using 15-15-15 with trace elements or approved equal. All other applications that may be
Page 364
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 31 of 60
requested by the Public Works Director shall be paid as extra work. Fertilization periods
shall be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall shear all shrubs as often as required such that each shrub is attractive
and neat without encroaching upon any adjacent improved area, street, or sidewalk, or
otherwise becoming a public hazard. Shearing shall be done in a manner to permit plants
to grow in accordance with their natural growth characteristics. Shrubs shall not be
individualized and/or sheared into “boxed,” “balled” or any other unnatural shapes.
The Contractor shall fertilize the entire shrub planter once per year using 15-15-15 with
trace elements or approved equal. All other applications that may be requested by the
Public Works Director shall be paid as extra work. Fertilization periods shall be recorded
on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall shear all shrubs two times per year in the spring and fall such that
each shrub is attractive and neat without encroaching upon any adjacent improved area,
street, or sidewalk, or otherwise becoming a public hazard. Shearing shall be done in a
manner to permit plants to grow in accordance with their natural growth characteristics.
Shrubs shall not be individualized and/or sheared into “boxed,” “balled” or any other
unnatural shapes.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize shrubs at “C” level.
Service Level D - The Contractor shall shear all shrubs one time per year in the fall or whenever the City
Public Works Director (or his agent) deems the shrub to be a hazard. Shrubs shall be
trimmed such that each shrub is attractive and neat without encroaching upon any
adjacent improved area, street, or sidewalk, or otherwise becoming a public hazard.
Shearing shall be done in a manner to permit plants to grow in accordance with their
natural growth characteristics. Shrubs shall not be individualized and/or sheared into
“boxed,” “balled” or any other unnatural shapes.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize shrubs at “C” level.
4.3.6.2. GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE
Trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant, or other area into which it should not
encroach including, but not limited to, walks, walls, curbs, mow curbs and fences as required for general
containment to present a neat, clean appearance of the planter and surrounding hardscapes within the
landscape site.
All sidewalks, mow curbs, boxes, etc. shall be edged completely with all remaining soil, groundcover and other
debris removed completely off these surfaces. A flat shovel will often be required to conform with this
specification.
Page 365
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 32 of 60
Any paper, litter, or other debris including, but not limited to, excessive pine needles or leaf litter, large rocks,
or anything else that accumulates in ground cover areas, shall be picked up concurrent with trimming.
Keep ground cover trimmed back from all controller units, valve boxes, quick couplers, or other appurtenances
or fixtures. Do not allow ground covers to grow up trees, into shrubs, or on structures or walls. Keep it trimmed
back approximately 4 inches from structures or walls. Coordinate trimming around base of shrubs/trees with
the City Representative.
Bare soil areas shall be replanted, composted, or wood chipped as directed. Coordinate replanting/chipping
with the City Representative. The contractor shall pay the costs to replant/mulch bare soil areas caused by
contractor negligence. Negligence includes (but is not limited to) the failure to provide water to sites that cannot
be repaired in a reasonable amount of time due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor.
Groundcover Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture,
plant, or other area into which it should not encroach such that a neatly trimmed
appearance and hazard free condition is consistently maintained.
The Contractor shall on a weekly basis clean any accumulated debris and trash from all
ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall fertilize 100% of all ground cover areas two times per year in the
spring and fall with 15-15-15 or approved equal. All other applications that may be
requested by the Public Works Director shall be paid as extra work. Fertilization periods
shall be recorded on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
The Contractor shall mechanically "bowl", as often as is required, around all irrigation
heads that are blocked by ground cover.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a monthly basis trim ground cover adjacent to any hardscape,
structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly basis clean any accumulated debris and trash from all
ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall fertilize 100% of all ground cover areas once per year in the spring
with 15-15-15 or approved equal. All other applications that may be requested by the
Public Works Director shall be paid as extra work. Fertilization periods shall be recorded
on the Maintenance Schedule Chart.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any
groundcover deemed a public safety hazard.
Page 366
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 33 of 60
The Contractor shall mechanically "bowl", as often as is required, around all irrigation
heads that are blocked by ground cover.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall on a bi-monthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent to any
hardscape, structure, fixture, plant, or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly schedule clean any accumulated debris and trash from
all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize ground cover.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, mow, or
otherwise lower, to a height of three inches all ground cover that is a fire hazard.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any
groundcover deemed a public safety hazard.
The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around
each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover.
Service Level D - The Contractor shall on a monthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent to any hardscape,
structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach.
The Contractor shall on a monthly schedule clean any accumulated debris and trash from
all ground cover areas.
The Contractor shall not be required to fertilize ground cover.
The Contractor shall at the direction of the Public Works Services Director, edge any
groundcover deemed a public safety hazard.
4.3.6.3. DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG)
To reduce water use, maintenance, and run-off; some areas within this contract may currently (or in the future)
contain relatively small areas of DG as a landscape element. These relatively low maintenance areas are
contained within the landscape and do not include equestrian and walking trails. DG areas shall be inventoried
and paid at the same monthly unit cost as groundcover.
Any paper, litter, rocks, trash, or other debris that accumulates in these DG areas shall be picked up at the
frequencies specified in Section 4.26.5, Debris and Trash Removal.
The Contractor shall provide complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all weeds, roots, suckers,
and pests. Pests include, but are not limited to insects, other invertebrates, and rodents. Pests may be
controlled by mechanical means as well as with chemicals.
Page 367
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 34 of 60
The contractor shall provide maintenance of all non-trail DG surfaces within the landscape at no additional cost
to the City. Maintenance shall include but will not be limited to filling and compacting low areas, ruts, washed-
out areas, vandalized areas, and any other area deemed hazardous.
Maintenance shall include not only the repairs but shall also include the removal of eroded or contaminated DG
materials from sidewalks, drains, curbs, gutters, cobble, turf areas, planters, and any other areas where the DG
does not belong. Eroded DG materials shall not be re-used in the trails or landscape and these materials shall
be disposed of off-site at no additional cost to the City.
Surface repair materials shall be clean and uncontaminated stabilized California Gold DG maintained at Header,
sidewalk, and curb height. DG is available from Gail Materials in Corona, CA Phone no. (951) 667-6106.
Submittal of all DG materials to the Public Works Services Director (or his agent) is required prior to any and all
surface repairs. Materials placed without prior approval that do not meet City specifications will be removed
and replaced at the expense of the contractor.
Proper placement will require good preparation, wetting and compaction. DG shall be placed, wetted, and
compacted at no more than 2” of lift at a time. In some cases, an additional lift may be required for the repair.
Remove rocks, debris and loose materials and grade smooth. For each 2” of lift, spread the material over the
area and grade level and smooth. Take the time necessary to thoroughly water the entire area to ensure the
entire depth and profile is moist. Use a shovel to confirm moisture depth. Once properly wetted, roll, vibra-
plate, or tamp the surface and allow enough time to dry. The surface shall be flush with all curbs, walks, headers
and drains. In some instances, it may be necessary to build the material ¼” higher than the hardscapes to
promote proper drainage.
Decomposed Granite Surface Repair Frequency
Service Level A - Surface repairs including the off-site removal and disposal of eroded and/or
contaminated DG materials shall be complete and continuous as required.
Service Level B - Surface repairs shall be performed in May when the rainy season has ended, or when it
has been determined by the Public Works Services Director (or his agent) that there is an
immediate safety hazard. The off-site removal and disposal of eroded DG materials shall
be complete and continuous as required.
Service Level C - Except for the removal of eroded materials, surface repairs will be completed by City
crews. The off-site removal and disposal of eroded DG materials shall be performed by
the contractor completely and continuously as required.
Service Level D - Removal of eroded materials and surface repairs will be completed by City crews.
Page 368
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 35 of 60
4.3.6.4. VINE MAINTENANCE
Vines are to be maintained such that they always present a neat appearance and are not a public hazard.
To help prevent vines from falling off the wall, vines are to be trimmed and maintained closely to the wall to
which they are attached.
Vines that are not growing over the top of a wall will not be allowed to grow over the top.
Vines that are growing over the top of a wall will be neatly trimmed on the city side and along the top without
allowing clippings to fall onto the homeowner's side.
Cut as few vines growing over to the homeowner's side as is necessary to achieve a neat appearance on the top
of the wall but attempting not to kill the vines on the homeowner's side. If a homeowner requests that the
City's vines be removed from the homeowner's side, remove them by pulling the vines from the homeowner's
side to the City side and trimming off the excess.
In addition to trimming vines at the top of the wall, vines shall also be trimmed along the bottom of the wall to
prevent them from encroaching into and damaging irrigation, groundcover, hardscapes, trees, shrubs, trails,
and sidewalks.
The Contractor will not remove any vines from the homeowner’s side without the homeowner’s permission.
The Contractor will reattach to a wall any vines that fall off a wall by using the attachments detailed on City
Standard Plan #510.
Vine Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall trim vines as often as required such that they consistently present a
neat appearance.
The Contractor shall immediately re-attach to a wall any vines that fall off a wall or fence
by using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
The Contractor shall ensure that no vines grow into undesirable places such as
groundcover, hardscapes, trees or shrubs.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall trim vines twice per year in March and September.
The Contractor shall immediately re-attach to a wall or fence any vines that fall off a wall
by using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
Concurrent with March and September vine trimming, the Contractor shall twice per year
remove vines that grow into undesirable places such as groundcover, hardscapes, trees,
or shrubs.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall trim vines once per year in Fall.
Page 369
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 36 of 60
The Contractor shall re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in Fall vines that fall off the
wall by using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site.
The Contractor shall annually, in Fall, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places
such as groundcover, hardscapes, trees or shrubs.
Service Level D - The Contractor shall trim vines once per year in Fall, or whenever the vines present a
public safety hazard.
4.3.6.5. TREE MAINTENANCE
a) All trees in the work site shall be maintained in their natural shapes. Work shall be accomplished in a
manner which will ensure that each individual tree is carefully maintained as described in Appendix A,
Pruning Standards, to promote the health and appearance of the tree. All work shall be of the highest
quality, performed in accordance with the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) standards. The
Contractor shall only be responsible for tree pruning as called out herein. Tree work not described herein
will be the responsibility of the City’s Urban Forestry Division and their tree maintenance contractor.
b) Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets shall be raised to a
height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade. Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall
be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above grade. Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be
raised to a height of ten (10) feet.
c) Young trees that need training shall be pruned on a continuing basis as needed. Under no circumstances
will stripping of lower branches (raising up) of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be
retained in a “tipped back” or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote
establishment, increased caliper, and a strong tapered trunk. If there are any doubts or questions,
contract the Public Works Services Director or his representative.
d) On all newly planted and unestablished trees (except for palms) Agriform 20-10-5 Plant Tablets (or
approved equal) shall be applied as per the manufacturer’s directions. All Date Palms shall be fertilized
in spring and fall with an approved Palm specific fertilizer. Fan Palms shall not be fertilized unless
otherwise directed by the Public Works Director.
e) The Contractor shall bring to the attention of the Public Works Services Director within twenty-four (24)
hours any tree that shows signs of root heaving, leaning, having hanger limbs, or for any reason is a
safety hazard.
f) The City shall bear all costs for the removal and replacement of dead or dying trees unless the need for
removal was due to faulty maintenance or negligence. Faulty maintenance or negligence includes (but
is not limited to) mower and string-trimmer damage. The Contractor, as determined by The Public Works
Services Director, shall replace trees requiring replacement due to faulty maintenance or negligence.
Replacement shall be made by the Contractor in the kind and size of trees as determined by the Public
Works Services Director. Where there is a difference in value between the trees lost and the
Page 370
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 37 of 60
replacement of trees, this difference will be deducted from the contract payment. In all cases, the value
of the trees lost will be determined by the Public Works Services Director using the latest edition of ISA’s
“Guide for Plant Appraisal” written by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.
g) All trees requiring staking shall always be securely staked with two approved stakes set perpendicular to
prevailing NE winds and secured to the stakes with at least two flexible ties and approved by the Public
Works Services Director. The ties and stakes shall be inspected regularly to ensure against girdling and
abrasion. Stakes shall not be allowed to touch the trunk or any major lateral branches. Therefore,
reducing the height of the stakes may be required to prevent damage. Stakes shall be removed as soon
as it is determined that a tree can stand on its own without support. Should 36-inch box or larger sized
trees need guying, the cost shall be paid by the City.
h) Except for irrigation, debris removal, and fall and spring fertilization, the City shall perform all
maintenance on palm trees within the worksite.
Tree Maintenance Frequency
Service Level A - Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks,
parkways, and equestrian trails shall continuously be maintained at the following heights
above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets
shall be raised to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of
nine (9) feet above grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10)
feet above grade.
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs
and surrounding plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
The Contractor shall maintain young trees in a “tipped-back”, not stripped, condition.
The Contractor shall maintain the staking for each tree requiring staking in accordance
with the current City tree planting standard.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be
immediately reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Service Level B - Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks,
parkways, and equestrian trails shall continuously be maintained at the following heights
above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets
shall be raised to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
Page 371
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 38 of 60
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of
nine (9) feet above grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10)
feet above grade.
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs
and surrounding plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
The Contractor shall maintain young trees in a “tipped-back”, not stripped, condition.
The Contractor shall maintain the staking for each tree requiring staking in accordance
with the current City tree planting standard.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be
immediately reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Service Level C - As often as required for safety purposes, low branches overhanging park and paseo
maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks, parkways, and equestrian trails shall be raised
to the following heights above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets
shall be raised to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of
nine (9) feet above grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10)
feet above grade.
Low hanging tree branches shall be trimmed in Fall as to not encroach onto shrubs and
surrounding plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
Hanging tree branches shall be trimmed as required as to not encroach onto shrubs and
surrounding plant materials as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be
immediately reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Young trees requiring staking or training shall be reported to the Public Works Services
Director.
Service Level D - As often as required for safety purposes, low branches overhanging park and paseo
maintenance driveways, streets, sidewalks, parkways, and equestrian trails shall be raised
to the following heights above grade:
• Low branches overhanging park and paseo maintenance driveways, and all streets
shall be raised to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade.
Page 372
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 39 of 60
• Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of
nine (9) feet above grade.
• Tree branches overhanging equestrian trails shall be raised to a height of ten (10)
feet above grade.
All tree hazards that are beyond the scope of the specifications of this contract shall be
immediately reported to the Public Works Service Director or his representative.
Young trees requiring staking or training shall be reported to the Public Works Services
Director.
4.3.7. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE (EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREIN, PAYMENT FOR ALL IRRIGATION WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE TURF
AND GROUNDCOVER LINE ITEMS.)
4.3.7.1. GENERAL
a) Irrigation shall be done using automatic sprinkler systems where available and operable. However,
failure of an existing irrigation system to provide full and proper coverage shall not relieve the Contractor
of the responsibility to provide adequate irrigation with full and proper coverage to all areas within the
work site. Providing full and adequate coverage may require hand watering, a station master, a battery
backup, or a water tender. This type of watering may be billed as an extra on a case-by-case basis
depending upon the circumstances. Failure to comply with this specification resulting in loss of plant
material will be subject to the remedies in section 4.21, Replacement of Landscape Materials & City
Property. Field controllers are installed for scheduling. The field controllers communicate with a central
computer to receive daily evapotranspiration data.
b) The irrigation schedule for each controller will be set by the City’s Water Management Team along with
regular input from the contractor’s account manager. The elements of the schedule to be set by City
Staff are days of the week to irrigate, start times, finish times, minutes per cycle, soak in times, demand
and percentage of daily evapo-transpiration per station and assignment of stations to programs. These
settings will be done within the guidelines established by the City.
c) The Contractor will be expected to use the absolute minimum amounts of water in all areas required to
maintain healthy plant growth. With regular required contractor input, the Water Management Team
will adjust the soil depletion numbers and percentages of evapo-transpiration for each station on the
field controller to ensure that the zone covered by each station is not too dry or too wet.
d) The Contractor shall periodically inspect the operation of the systems for any malfunction. The
Contractor shall maintain all sprinkler systems, at no additional cost to the City, in such a way as to
guarantee proper coverage and full working capability; and make whatever adjustments may be
necessary (including raising the sprinkler heads to the proper height) in order to provide proper irrigation
to plants and to prevent excessive runoff into street rights-of-way or other areas not meant to be
Page 373
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 40 of 60
irrigated.
e) The periodic inspections may occur more often, but not less frequently than one inspection each week.
No watering shall be done during the day unless approved by the Public Works Services Director. The
Contractor must provide adequate personnel to observe any irrigation system operations during the day.
f) In addition to the weekly inspections, written quarterly irrigation system reports will also be required for
each landscape site in the contract. Reports shall include but are not limited to the following information:
name of inspector, site number, date, recommended schedule changes, recommended upgrades, soil
moisture and depth, repairs made, repairs needed, overall coverage and distribution, and overall
condition of the turf, planters, and trees. Reports shall be attached to the monthly routine billing and
will be required for monthly payment.
g) Sprinkler heads will be kept clear of overgrowth that may obstruct operation. Chemical edging with
herbicides around turf heads will not be permitted. However, an approved plant growth regulator may
be used.
h) Any damages to public or private property resulting from excessive irrigation water or irrigation water
runoff shall be charged against the contract payment unless immediate repairs are made by the
Contractor to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director.
i) The centralized irrigation control will be operated by City employees. The field controllers communicate
alerts to the Centralized irrigation control. The contractor will be responsible for receiving alerts
electronically, and all account managers will be required to have a smart phone or other hand-held
device that can communicate with these controllers to bring up alert data and operate stations remotely.
Alerts that are not transmitted automatically will be sent electronically to the account manager Monday
through Thursday. The alerts in many cases will be needed repairs or adjustments to systems in the
field. These reports are valuable for locating and identifying many irrigation issues but normally list only
a small portion of the irrigation issues that are in the field. Responding to an alert is not a substitute for
required weekly routine irrigation inspections and repairs. Any irrigation repairs requested by the Public
Works Services Director (including but not limited to alerts) are required to be expeditiously corrected
within a reasonable amount of time. The Public Works Services Director will determine the reasonable
amount of time, in which the contractor must adhere. The contractor is also required to train the
irrigation technicians to a competent level in the use of the centralized irrigation system. The Public
Works Services Director will evaluate the competence of the technicians. Upon request of the
contractor, the City may provide training concerning the centralized irrigation system.
j) As needed or at least annually, all drip irrigation systems will be flushed out and filter screens cleaned
or replaced. This work shall be reported on the quarterly irrigation reports required in section 4.26.3.1
f.
k) As needed and at least annually for each point of connection incorporating a filter, the contractor will
inspect, clean, and replace as required. This work shall be reported on the quarterly irrigation reports
Page 374
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 41 of 60
required in section 4.26.3.1 f.
l) As needed and at least annually the contractor will also inspect the point of connection for correct
operating pressure. If operating pressure is above or below specifications, the condition shall be
reported immediately to the Public Works Services Director. The Public Works Services Director or his
agent will determine course of action.
m) All irrigation heads that are not watering plant material shall immediately be reported to the Public
Works Services director for corrective action. In most cases, these heads will be capped, or nozzle radii
will be reduced in the interest of water savings. Capping of heads and nozzle changes on bare areas may
be billed as an extra.
4.3.7.2. SHRUB BEDS & PLANTER AREAS
Shrub beds and planter areas shall be irrigated as required, to maintain horticulturally acceptable growth and
color, and to promote deep rooting. Irrigation rates for shrub and planter areas shall be applied in such a
manner as to keep surface runoff at a minimum. The irrigation rates shall be adjusted to the needs of shrub
types, seasons, weather conditions, and water budget.
4.3.7.3. TURF AREAS
Turf areas shall be irrigated as required to maintain acceptable growth and color. Turf areas shall be maintained
using the least amount of water possible. These low water use specifications will cause some slight stress.
However, if horticultural programs such as regular aerification, correct mower heights, proper fertility, weed
control, and required system maintenance/programming is implemented, the stress should be mild enough for
the turf plants to recover quickly when irrigated. Irrigation shall be applied in such a manner as to reduce runoff
yet provide deep watering to promote deep rooting and improved drought resistance. Failure of the contractor
to address severe and on-going over-watering issues and system maintenance will be subject to a site deduction
for the month.
4.3.7.4. NEW PLANT MATERIALS
Newly planted trees, shrubs, ground cover and turf shall receive adequate and regular attention until these
plants are established. Adequate water shall be applied to promote normal, healthy growth. Proper berms or
basins shall be maintained during the establishment period. Routine supplemental deep watering either by
quick coupler, water tender, or by the installation of a supplemental irrigation system will be required to avoid
dead plant material as well as the prevention of overwatering established plants located on the same hydro-
zone.
4.3.7.5. REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT
Routine repairs to irrigation systems such as replacement of wiper seals, worn or broken nozzles, heads and
risers and other routine maintenance shall be completed by the Contractor at no cost to the City. Replaced or
Page 375
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 42 of 60
newly installed irrigation heads shall be identical to the heads specified in the approved City Standard Plans
unless otherwise specified by the Public Works Services Director or his representative. Further, any other
irrigation work shall also conform to the current approved City Standard Plans. Any deviation from these plans
is considered a variance and all variances shall be approved in writing by the Public Works Services Director or
his representative prior to the commencement of any work.
Costs of repairs to backflow preventers, pressure lines, valves, irrigation pumps and controllers requires written
pre-authorization by the Public Works Director or his agent and will be paid as extra work. Additionally, costs of
repairs beyond the control of the Contractor such as vandalism, vehicular accidents, acts of nature, or other
events not deemed contractor negligence shall also be paid as extra work. Any irrigation repairs requested by
the Public Works Services Director (including but not limited to alerts) are required to be expeditiously corrected
within a reasonable amount of time. Irrigation work not completed within the timeframes outlined in section
4.16 c may result in a deduction pursuant to section 4.15, Deductions. The Public Works Services Director will
determine the reasonable amount of time, in which the contractor must adhere. The City reserves the right to
use other contractors or City staff to complete any work not performed by the contractor. Per section 4.10,
Non-Responsiveness of Contractor, of the special provisions in this contract, the City also reserves the right to
deduct those costs from the routine billing for the month if the contractor is non-responsive to any emergency.
4.3.8. PEST CONTROL
The Contractor shall provide complete control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds at the frequencies
specified herein. Pests include, but are not limited to, insects, mites, other invertebrates, pathogens,
nematodes, and vertebrates. Pests may be controlled by mechanical means as well as with chemicals. Chemical
controls may include plant growth regulators.
Annually at the time of contract renewal, the Contractor shall submit a list for approval by the Public Works
Services Director of all chemical pesticides proposed for use under this contract. Attached to the list will be the
current label and safety data sheet (SDS), for each chemical on the list. Additionally, any changes or updates
made to this list shall be supplied to the Public Works Services Director as they are made. Materials included
on this list shall be limited to chemicals approved for use by the State of California Department of Food and
Agriculture. No chemical pesticide shall be applied until its use is approved in writing by the Public Works
Services Director. The application of chemicals shall conform to the current California Department of Food and
Agriculture regulations.
Use of all E.P.A. registered pesticides must be preceded by notification to the Public Works Services Director a
minimum of one week prior to the planned application date. The notification must be in writing and shall include
the pest control advisor's written recommendation and State of California Agriculture Pest Control Advisor
License number. A permit from the County Agricultural Commissioner's office to apply any restricted use
pesticide must be obtained, and a notice of intent shall be filed at least forty-eight (48) hours before applications
Page 376
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 43 of 60
with the San Bernardino County Agricultural Commissioner's office as per State and County guidelines.
Only the safest, lowest odor and most environmentally friendly pesticides shall be used whenever possible. In
addition, integrated pest management techniques shall also be used whenever possible, e.g., use of approved
biological, mechanical, or exclusionary control methods.
The Contractor shall select and supply proper materials and licensed personnel and obtain any necessary
permits, licenses, registrations, and pest control advisor recommendations, to comply with City, County, State
or Federal regulations and laws. Copies of all County and State licenses, registrations, and permits required shall
be supplied to the Public Works Services Director on an annual basis. The contractor will assume responsibility
and liability for the use of all chemicals and their applications.
Spray pattern indicators or dye markers shall not be used anywhere within this contract without the expressed
written consent of the Public Works Services Director.
The Contractor's applicator shall hold a valid Qualified Applicator License or a Certified Commercial Applicator
Certificate, issued by the State of California Department of Food and Agriculture, and be certified, or licensed,
in at least Categories B and C. The Contractor must supply the City with a photocopy of the License or Certificate.
If subcontractors are used for any pesticide applications, photocopies of their License or Certificate, County
Registration and City Business License must be provided.
Pest control advisor recommendations shall be written for all types of chemical applications made in City parks
or rights-of-way. Recommendations shall be written on forms approved by the San Bernardino County
Agricultural Commissioner and a copy shall be provided to the Public Works Services Director prior to the
application for his approval. All recommendations shall follow the guidelines set forth by the State and County
Departments of Food and Agriculture, regarding pest control advisor recommendations. Pest control
recommendations are registered by the County for one calendar year in January. Therefore, updated
recommendations shall be submitted every January.
Pesticide application records shall be kept on forms identical to the format provided in Schedule II. A copy of
each application form shall be provided to the City at the time of monthly invoicing.
Additionally, and prior to bid acceptance or contract renewal, the contractor shall provide to the Public Works
Services Director a schedule outlining a written annual integrated pest management plan describing what
products and/or alternative methods of pest control that will be scheduled each month. This monthly
information shall include:
• The target pest (gophers, grassy weeds, broadleaf weeds, shrub growth, insects, etc.)
• The type of control method to be used (mechanical, chemical, cultural)
Page 377
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 44 of 60
• Where the method of control will be used (turf, hardscape, groundcover, mulchscape)
• The name of the product to be used (Roundup Pro, Dimension, Ronstar, etc.)
• The type of product to be used (Pre-emergent, PGR, insecticide, rodenticide, etc.)
• The application rate to be used (lbs. or ozs. per acre or per 1000 sq. ft.)
Pest Control Frequency
Service Level A - Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all Landscape pests and weeds.
Service Level B - Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all Landscape pests and weeds.
Service Level C - Complete, thorough, and consistent control and eradication of all Landscape pests and
weeds within the landscape every 90 days or whenever the Public Works Services
Director determines that a pest or weed problem has become a public health or safety
hazard. Complete, thorough, and consistent control of weeds shall include the use of
pre-emergent herbicides broadcast over the entire planter area, as well as post
emergent herbicides spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control.
Complete, thorough, and consistent weed control utilizing the proper selection and
application of herbicides on schedule, will result in a relatively acceptable level of
control for this reduced service level lasting the entire length of the 90-day period.
Service Level D - Complete, and thorough control and eradication of all Landscape pests and weeds within
the landscape two times per year (Spring and Fall) or whenever the Public Works Services
Director determines that a pest or weed problem has become a public health or safety
hazard. Complete and thorough, control of weeds shall include the use of pre-emergent
herbicides broadcast over the entire planter area, as well as post emergent herbicides
spot sprayed as required to achieve complete weed control.
4.3.9. DEBRIS AND TRASH REMOVAL
Debris and Trash Removal Frequency
Service Level A - The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates on
the landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and
decomposed granite areas including adjacent flowlines.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates on
the landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and
decomposed granite areas including adjacent flowlines.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall on a bi-weekly basis remove any trash and debris that accumulates
on the landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and
decomposed granite areas including adjacent flowlines.
Page 378
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 45 of 60
Service Level D - The Contractor shall monthly remove any trash and debris that accumulates on the
landscape site including turf, groundcover, mulchscape, hardscape, and decomposed
granite areas including adjacent flowlines.
4.3.10. DRAINS (ALL SERVICE LEVELS)
The Contractor shall be responsible for periodic inspections of surface flowlines, intake grates, and under
sidewalk drains located within the landscaped areas. These drains shall be inspected during, prior to, and
following any rain event. Any debris or vegetation that could block the flow of water will require prompt
removal.
4.3.11. CLEAN-UP (ALL SERVICE LEVELS)
a) At no time will the Contractor blow grass cuttings and/or debris into public streets, trails, or gutters
without promptly removing the cuttings and/or debris and disposing of it legally, off site.
b) Unless a chipper is used as described below in section 4.26.7(d), the Contractor shall remove all debris
resulting from the maintenance operations and legally dispose of it off-site. All grass or other clippings
shall be picked up after each mowing or trimming operation.
c) All debris resulting from any of the Contractor's operations shall be removed and disposed of legally at
the Contractor's expense. No debris will be allowed to remain at the end of the workday.
d) To improve the fertility of planter beds, save water, reduce weeds, reduce the amount of green waste in
the landfill, lower soil pH, and improve efficiency, the contractor may be required in many instances to
utilize a chipper to mulch brush clippings back into the landscape planter from where the clippings had
originated. The contractor will always be required to have a trained chipper operator on staff to
accommodate this request at no additional cost to the City. This chipper program will be used wherever
and whenever it is practical and will be utilized primarily wherever there are larger planter beds that are
not wood-chipped. Only clippings from shrubs and trees will be allowed. Grass clippings, leaves, palm
fronds, trash and weeds shall not be included in this program. The contractor shall always have a
commercial brush chipper available at no additional cost to the City.
e) All walkways will be kept clean/clear of debris and weed growth. Care shall be taken not to create
unnecessary hazards to the public.
f) Any paper, plastic, metal, leaves, pine needles, branches, rocks, DG, sand, soil, dead plant materials, litter
or any other debris determined objectionable by the Public Works Services Director that accumulates
within the work site shall be picked up weekly (or whenever the debris presents a hazard) and legally
disposed of offsite. All illegal dumping, including but not limited to hazardous waste, within the work site
shall be reported immediately to the Public Works Services Director or his representative.
Page 379
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 46 of 60
4.3.12. HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
Hardscape is all masonry or rock materials on a site from the edge of the asphalt/curb and gutter to the tract
wall – the edge of the asphalt/curb and gutter shall include the crack or void between the asphalt and the
concrete. Hardscape includes features within the landscape such as curbs, mow curbs, cobblestones, concrete
pavers and concrete flowlines and sidewalks. All hardscape is to be maintained within the landscape site
(including sidewalks) at the frequencies listed below. Maintenance shall include keeping the hardscape clean,
debris- and weed free by using whatever approved methods are necessary. Graffiti removal is not required but
known instances of graffiti shall be reported immediately to the City Graffiti Hotline at 909-481-7999. Also, any
spills, stains or damage on the hardscape shall be reported to the Public Works Services Director or his
representative. This contract may or may not have hardscapes listed separately on a site inventory or paid
separately from the turf and groundcover areas. In either case, all hardscapes shall be maintained as part of
the landscape maintenance contract at the same service level as the adjacent landscape.
Service Level A - The Contractor shall, on a weekly basis remove any weeds, trash and debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
Service Level B - The Contractor shall on a bi- weekly basis, remove any weeds, trash and debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
Service Level C - The Contractor shall, on a bi-weekly basis, remove any weeds, trash and or debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
Service Level D - The Contractor shall, on a monthly basis remove any weeds, trash and or debris that
accumulates on the hardscape.
4.3.13. TRAIL MAINTENANCE
Many sites within the LMD’s will have trails. Trails are defined as any PVC fencing and/or headers delineating
one or both sides of a decomposed granite (DG) surface and the decomposed granite itself. The City will be
responsible for all trail maintenance within the sites except for excessive irrigation runoff and encroaching plant
material from contractor-maintained landscapes; debris caused by landscape maintenance; eroded mulch and
soil from contractor-maintained sites, broken PVC fencing caused by Contractor negligence; and any other trail
maintenance problem caused by Contractor negligence.
4.3.14. MULCHSCAPE MAINTENANCE
“Mulchscape” refers to formerly landscaped areas that have been renovated and removed from regular contract
maintenance. These areas will be covered with a layer of composted mulch and/or wood chips and use little or
no water. Any trees growing within the mulchscaped sites will remain after conversion. Additionally, some low-
maintenance shrubs and groundcover may remain whenever practical. Any maintenance on remaining
groundcover or shrubs within the mulchscaped areas may be billed as extra work. Maintenance of these areas
will include the following:
Page 380
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 47 of 60
Service Level A - Mulchscaped areas will be consistently maintained on a weekly basis to present a neat
and clean appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
In May of each year, mulch will be added to all mulchscaped areas as required to restore
the depth of mulch to three inches throughout each mulchscaped site. Submittals are
required for approval by the Public Works Services Director or his representative on all
materials prior to installation.
Service Level B - Mulchscaped areas will be consistently maintained on a weekly basis to present a neat
and clean appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
In May of each year, mulch will be added to all mulchscaped areas as required to restore
the depth of mulch to three inches throughout each mulchscaped site. Submittals are
required for approval by the Public Works Services Director or his representative on all
materials prior to installation.
Service Level C - On a bi-weekly basis, mulchscaped areas will be maintained to present a neat and clean
appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
When specified by the Public Works Services Director, mulch shall be applied by the
contractor to a depth of no less than three inches and billed as extra work. Submittals
are required for approval by the Public Works Services Director or his representative on
all materials prior to installation.
Service Level D - On a monthly basis, mulchscaped areas will be maintained to present a neat and clean
appearance free of trash and accumulated debris.
When specified by the Public Works Services Director, mulch shall be applied by the
contractor to a depth of no less than three inches and billed as extra work. Submittals
are required for approval by the Public Works Services Director or his representative on
all materials prior to installation.
4.3.15. TRASH RECEPTACLE MAINTENANCE
There are an unspecified number of trashcans within this contract and additional trash cans may be added as
required. bags will be collected once per week and replaced with new bags. These bags shall be provided by
the contractor. Any trash can with damage, missing lids, graffiti or vandalism shall be reported to the Public
Works Services Director immediately. In addition, pest control including (but not limited to) ant control will be
required whenever necessary.
The trash cans along the Pacific Electric Trail and at bus stops are maintained under a separate contract or by
another agency and will not be included herein.
Page 381
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 48 of 60
4.3.16. STORM DEBRIS CLEANUP
a) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is subject to frequent wind, rain, and other types of storms. The storms
cause an accumulation of debris on the contracted sites. The debris includes such items as downed trees,
limbs, leaves, tumbleweeds, trash, and soil deposits. Because it is impractical to perform routine
maintenance operations during and immediately following these storms, the Contractor shall promptly
remove the debris such that routine maintenance operations are practical. Because the Contractor is
removing debris in lieu of routine maintenance, the removal is at no extra charge to the City. In the case of
an excessive accumulation of debris that is attributable to another agency, such as blown sand from a
recently graded site, the City will act to have the responsible agency remove the debris. The cost for
replanting new plant material to replace storm damaged plant material that cannot be repaired will be an
extra.
b) Emergency Storm Work Documentation and Tracking:
All costs borne by the City for emergency storm clean-up work may be subject to re-imbursement through
government disaster funds. In the event of an emergency, the City could easily be eligible for Federal, State,
or local funds and therefore all costs that are storm related including labor, rentals and materials that are
charged to the City shall be recorded and billed separately and labeled/dated as emergency related. In
addition, since labor will be shifted away from routine work, all the shifted routine labor shall be tracked
and recorded as emergency related since emergency labor may also be reimbursable. Once the contractor
returns to normal operations, the contractor will be required to send a report outlining the shifted routine
labor used during the emergency.
4.4. EXTRA WORK
a) Extra work may be required because of vandalism, accidents, or acts of nature. Further, work may be
required to add new landscaping, or to delete or modify existing landscape.
b) Extra work will not be performed without prior approval by the Public Works Services Director unless a
condition exists wherein it appears there is a danger of injury to persons or property.
c) Payment for extra work shall be in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices in the Extra Work
Schedule. The invoiced amount for material not listed in the schedule will be at the Contractor’s cost
including sales tax plus 15%; the 15% being for the Contractor’s costs of overhead.
d) Except for routinely billed and ordinary irrigation repairs, extra work shall not commence without a written
and approved proposal. Further, the extra work shall not be invoiced and billed until the work has been
inspected and approved for completeness by the Public Works Services Director.
e) The City reserves the right to cause any extra work deemed necessary by the Public Works Services Director
to be performed by City crews or other contractors, at no cost to the Contractor.
Page 382
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 49 of 60
5. EVALUATION AND VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those
RFP responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the RFP requirement as indicated herein will
proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by
an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10),
ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will
be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Vendor Expertise 10
Quality of proposed services or goods 15
Extent to which the Vendors services or goods meet the City ’s
needs 25
Cost 15
Vendor’s history and resources available to provide the required
services 15
Experience and professional qualifications of staff 20
5.3. COST EVALUATION
Cost Proposals are evaluated and scored based on the following calculations.
Score = Lowest Proposal Cost / Cost of Proposal being scored X Maximum Points Available (10)
The score is then added to the spreadsheet criteria scores.
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and the requesting
department may or may not be present during the process. The reference checks may be conducted by phone
with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Vendor’s reference
Page 383
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 50 of 60
contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score
from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with
the criteria scores. It is imperative that Vendors provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact
information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Vendor ranking.
Evaluators do not see the Vendor References or pricing line items. The proposed pricing is evaluated by the
Procurement Division during the initial review of the RFP response, only to ensure that the proposed cost is not
over the City ’s budgeted amount or Not-to-Exceed amount for the project.
5.5. PRESENTATIONS / ORAL BOARD INTERVIEWS
Upon completion of the RFP evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked Vendors
will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to further expand
on their RFP response. Vendor interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through
ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as
stated within the RFP.
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
Vendors that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its
Company’s financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department.
Should a Vendor wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon
completion of the review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation
will be required of each Vendor on the short-list:
• A copy of the Vendor’s most recent annual report.
• Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years.
• If audited data is not available, Vendor shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the past
three (3) years.
• Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by
the Vendor.
• Indicate all applicable information regarding Vendor ownership changes in the last three (3)
years.
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER
Upon completion of Vendor presentations, the City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or
pre-contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Vendors. At which time the City may request a Best and
Final Offer to be submitted from one or all finalists.
Page 384
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 51 of 60
5.8. VENDOR SELECTION
The final Vendor selection is based on which Vendor is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s requirements,
offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the lowest price
proposal.
The City may conduct negotiations with several Vendors simultaneously. The City may also negotiate contract
terms with the selected Vendors prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right, unless
otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part thereof, either separately or to waive
any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the City.
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Vendor selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all
participating, responsive Vendors. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing
Vendors unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may
negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Vendor or withdraw the RFP entirely.
Page 385
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 52 of 60
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT”
It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such
conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for
Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Vendors.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to
the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003 LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any
RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not
limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP
response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and
agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Vendors)
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 386
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 53 of 60
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”
Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Vendors accepts the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Vendors proposes exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as
“Exception Summary”, which shall include the Vendors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each
exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the
submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 387
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 54 of 60
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________
(President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative)
of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the
(Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003 for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians have been read and
understood and that our Vendors is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure
to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate
disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 388
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 55 of 60
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Vendors hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Vendors understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered
non-responsive. It is the Vendors’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number
of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 389
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 56 of 60
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”
I certify that neither _____________________________ (Vendor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are
not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in
accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986
Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed
subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Vendors or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or
debarment by a local, state, or federal government entity, or if Vendors or any of its subcontractors
subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 390
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 57 of 60
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may
utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of
________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner
or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of
such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of
its own order placement and payments of the Vendors.
Successful Vendors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please
specify.
YES __________ NO _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 391
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 58 of 60
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned Company declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms
and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO
MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name:
Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address:
Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print)
Title:
Signature:
Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Page 392
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 59 of 60
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Page 393
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-003
for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 & 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 60 of 60
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibit H.
Page 394
PREPARED FOR:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Ruth Cain
(909) 774-2500
ruth.cain@cityofrc.us
PREPARED BY:
Mariposa Landscapes Inc.
6232 Santos Diaz St, Irwindale, CA 91702
Joceylin Figueroa, Estimator
(626) 210-9495
Joceylin.figueroa@mariposa-ca.com
RESPONSE TO:
RFP # 25/26-003
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance for LMD 6R, LMD 9 and
LMD 10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians
June 11th, 2025
Page 395
Page 396
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 3
3.2 Table of Contents
3.1 Cover Letter/Introduction ......................................................................................... 2
3.2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................... 3
3.3 Project Understanding and Approach ........................................................................ 4
3.4 Qualifications and Experience .................................................................................. 6
3.5 Project Team ......................................................................................................... 15
3.6 Staffing Levels ....................................................................................................... 17
3.7 Third-Party/Subcontractors .................................................................................... 18
3.8 Proposal Response ................................................................................................ 19
Page 397
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 4
3.3 Project Understanding and Approach
Understanding the Project
We understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking a qualified contractor to provide
comprehensive, consistent, and high-quality landscape and irrigation maintenance services for
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6R, 9 &10 Parkways, Paseos and Medians.
Our team recognizes the City’s emphasis on:
• Maintaining a safe, clean, and aesthetically pleasing environment.
• Adhering to strict service schedules and performance standards.
• Minimizing water usage through efficient irrigation practices.
• Ensuring compliance with prevailing wage laws and environmental regulations.
Approach to Scope of Services
We propose a structured, proactive approach that includes:
Dedicated Account Manager
• Responsible for all communication and quality control. This individual will serve as the City’s
primary point of contact and will oversee all field operations, coordinate crew schedules,
conduct site inspections, and ensure that all work meets the City’s service level standards. The
Account Manager will also be responsible for submitting maintenance schedules, responding to
emergency calls, and maintaining detailed records of completed work, deficiencies, and
corrective actions.
Routine Maintenance
• This includes turf, groundcover, shrubs, trees, hardscape, restrooms, etc. which will all be
performed per service level requirements. Our crews will follow a detailed, site-specific
maintenance schedule that aligns with the frequencies outlined in the RFP. Tasks include
mowing, edging, pruning, debris removal, and hardscape cleaning. All work will be documented
and reviewed regularly to ensure compliance with the City’s expectations and to maintain a
clean, safe, and visually appealing environment.
Irrigation Management
• We will monitor all irrigation systems for leaks, coverage issues, and efficiency. Our team will
provide input on controller settings and make routine repairs to heads, nozzles, risers and
provide weekly inspections and quarterly reports. Any major repairs or upgrades will be
reported and proposed as extra work, with full documentation and photos.
Pest and Weed Control
• Our approach emphasizes prevention and low-toxicity solutions by implementing the approved
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan and having licensed applicators. We will submit an
annual pest control plan for City approval, including product labels and safety data sheets. All
applications will be performed by certified professionals and documented in reports.
Page 398
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 5
Reporting and Communication
• We will maintain open, transparent communication with the City. Our reports will include
summaries of completed work, upcoming tasks, irrigation performance, and any issues requiring
City input or approval.
Assumptions and Enhancements:
• All work will be performed per the scope and service levels outlined in Section 4 of the RFP.
• We anticipate periodic changes to site inventory and service levels and will respond with flexibility
and updated cost proposals as needed.
• We are exploring additional efficiency tools to enhance performance tracking and reduce the
administrative burden on City staff.
Our team is committed to maintaining a safe, clean, and welcoming public environment across Rancho
Cucamonga’s community space, reflecting the City’s high standards and expectations for its residents and
visitors.
Page 399
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 6
3.4 Qualifications and Experience
Company Information
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. has been in business for over 45 years . Our main business focus has been in
Landscape Construction, Maintenance, Tree Care, Irrigation, and Drought-Tolerant Conversions. To
support this project, we will leverage our headquarters in Irwindale, CA, which is centrally located and
fully equipped with a modern fleet, trained personnel, and in-house mechanics. Additionally, we have a
network of strategically located branch offices throughout Southern California and Arizona. For this
contract we will be providing services from our Fontana Branch office located at: 11093 Almond Ave.
Fontana, CA 92337.
Pending Litigation
The following table lists Mariposa's pending litigations. None of these litigations will affect our
performance for the city.
Statement of incorporation
Mariposa Landscapes Inc. is a corporation founded in 1977.
Page 400
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 7
Projects of Similar Scope of Work
Here at Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. we take pride in our work and thrive on keeping our company as one
of the most recommended in the industry. Our steady record of customer satisfaction has allowed us to
maintain positive relationships with our clients.
1. City of Fontana (2023-present)
Scope of Work: Landscape Maintenance Services Area 4
Landscape Maintenance, Irrigation maintenance and Installation. Scope includes inspections, mowing,
trimming, pruning, fertilization, aeration, weed control, cultivation, pest control, tree surgery, de-
thatching, plant replacements, renovation, clean-up of park facilities and drainage facilities.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager – Roberto Perez
Account Manager – Edgar Garibay
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2023.
2. City of Chino Hills (2022-present)
Scope of Work: Landscape Maintenance Services for North Service Area
Landscape Maintenance- Turf maintenance, shrub/slope maintenance, ground cover maintenance, tree
trimming, irrigation maintenance and repairs, water management, infield maintenance, mowing, litter
and trash control, pesticide application, weed control, rodent control, aeration, and fertilization.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager – Roberto Perez
Account Manager – Jesus Ramirez
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2022.
3. Riverside Utilities (2006-present)
Scope of Work: Landscape Maintenance
Landscape maintenance of approximately 82 utilities facilities. Scope includes mowing, edging,
dethatching, aeration, weeding, fertilization, watering, insect, pest and vermin control, irrigation and
sprinkler system maintenance, trimming, pruning, and treatment and control of plant diseases, litter
removal, clean-up and herbicides application.
Key Team Members:
Area Manager – Roberto Perez
Account Manager – Gustavo Suarez
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2006.
Page 401
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 8
4. Inland Empire Health Plan (2024-present)
Scope of Work: Campus Landscape Maintenance Program Services
Tree maintenance, turf maintenance , weed pest and disease control, Fertilization, Ground Cover
maintenance, aerification, hard pruning, watering, mulching/ ground cover, shrub maintenance, vine
maintenance, annual color, irrigation equipment and operations, repairs, cleanup & waste disposal,
gopher control, paved area weed control
Key Team Members:
Area Manager – Roberto Perez
Account Manager – Dirk Bennet
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2024.
5. City of Corona (2023-present)
Scope of Work: Cajalco and I-15 Interchange Landscape Maintenance Services Rebid, NIB 23-051AS
General landscape maintenance including fertilization, pruning, tree trimming, shrubs, vines and
groundcover, weed control and plant disease, mowing, edging, maintain and repair irrigation system,
general clean-up, removal of leaves, trash, and other debris, maintain hardscape, including DG and
rockscape areas
Key Team Members:
Area Manager – Roberto Perez
Account Manager – Gustavo Suarez
Timeline of project delivery:
The contract has been currently serviced by Mariposa landscapes since 2023.
Page 402
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 9
Additional Information
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. has been transforming outdoor spaces with expertise and innovation since
1977. What began as a small operation in Rosemead, California, has grown into one of the most trusted
names in landscaping across Southern California and Arizona. Today, we proudly employ over 800
dedicated professionals, including Certified Arborists, Pest Control Advisors, Certified Irrigators, and
Landscape Technicians.
Our Core Values
Our success is driven by a set of core values that underpin every aspect of our operations:
• Safety: Ensuring the well-being of our team and clients on every project.
• Teamwork: Collaborating with clients and stakeholders to achieve shared goals.
• Quality: Setting the highest standards for every service we provide.
• Integrity: Building trust through transparency, accountability, and ethical practices.
With over 45 years of experience, Mariposa is
renowned for excellence in Landscape Construction,
Maintenance, Tree Care, Irrigation, and Drought-
Tolerant Conversions. Our portfolio reflects a rich
history of award-winning projects - more than 100
recognitions to date - demonstrating our unwavering
commitment to quality and craftsmanship. As a fully
licensed company in both California and Arizona, we
carry $100 million in bonding capacity and maintain
large insurance coverage, including $10 million in
general liability and $1 million in workers'
compensation, ensuring our clients’ peace of mind on
every project.
At Mariposa, we are more than a landscaping company - we are stewards of the environment.
Sustainability is at the heart of everything we do, from implementing water-saving irrigation systems to
promoting native plant restoration and integrating environmentally friendly practices into every project.
Our approach is guided by a deep understanding of Southern California and Arizona’s unique ecosystems,
allowing us to create outdoor spaces that are as functional and beautiful as they are sustainable. We take
pride in enhancing landscapes while contributing to the well-being of the communities we serve.
Why Choose Mariposa Landscapes?
• Award-Winning Excellence: A proven track record with over 95 industry recognitions for
innovative and high-quality landscaping projects.
• Comprehensive Expertise: From public parks and commercial landscapes to large-scale
restoration projects, we have the expertise to handle a wide variety of landscaping needs.
• Sustainability Leadership: Implementing drought-resistant designs and sustainable practices that
protect natural resources while enhancing aesthetic value.
• Client-Centered Approach: A commitment to understanding and exceeding our clients’
expectations with tailored, results-driven solutions.
Page 403
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 10
Key Facts at a Glance
With strategically located offices across Southern California and Arizona, Mariposa Landscapes delivers
exceptional landscape solutions using advanced equipment, innovative technologies, and a skilled team,
transforming landscapes and enriching communities with every project.
The following table provides a complete overview of Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., highlighting our relevant
information, areas of expertise, and operational capabilities:
Company Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. Awards Over 95 awards for project excellence
Founded 1977 Primary
Services
Landscape construction, maintenance,
tree care, irrigation, and drought tolerant
conversions
Address 6232 Santos Diaz St, Irwindale, CA
91702
Service Areas Southern California and Arizona
Telephone (626) 960-0196 Office
Locations
1) HQ: Irwindale, CA
2) Orange County: Santa Ana, CA
3) San Bernardino County: Fontana, CA
4) Riverside County: Chino, CA
5) LA South Bay: Gardena, CA
6) North LA. & Ventura: Somis, CA
7) Palm Springs: Bermuda Dunes, CA
8) San Diego County: Oceanside, CA
9) Arizona: Glendale, AZ
10) Arizona: Phoenix, AZ
Fax (626) 960-8477
Employees Over 800 employees
Licensed In California + Arizona
Insurance $1M workers’ compensation, $10M
general
Bonding $100 million
Organizations, Current and Past Memberships
• CACM (California Association of Community Managers)
• CAI Orange County (Community Association Institute)
• CAI Los Angeles (Community Associations Institute)
• CAI Greater Inland Empire (Community Association
Institute)
• CAI Coachella Valley (Community Association Institute)
• ASA (American Subcontractors Association)
• BIA Southern California (Building Industry Association)
• BIA Orange County (Building Industry Association)
• BOMA IE (Building Owners and Managers Association)
• CLCA (California Landscape Contractors Association)
• ISA (International Society of Arboriculture)
• CAPCA (California Association of Pest Control Advisors)
Licensing and Certifications
• California Contractor License
592268 C27, A, D49/C61, C31
• Certified Arborists on staff
• Certified Tree Workers on staff
• Tree Work – Line Clearance
Certified
• Tree Work – Line Clearance
Certified Instructor
• Certified Playground Equipment
Inspectors
• Certified Water Auditor
• Certified Backflow Inspectors
• Licensed Pest Control
Company/Pest Control Advisor
• Certified Pest Control Applicators
on staff
Proposal Contact: Joceylin Figueroa
Joceylin.figueroa@mariposa-ca.com
(626) 210-9495
Page 404
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 11
Our Services
Mariposa offers a full spectrum of landscaping services, blending expertise, innovation, and sustainability
to meet each client's unique needs. Below is an overview of our capabilities.
Landscape Maintenance
Maintaining vibrant landscapes requires strategic care and attention to detail. Our services encompass
large-scale mowing, efficient irrigation, eco-friendly pest control, and year-round fertilization to support
plant health and ecosystem vitality. Additional offerings include athletic turf maintenance, detailed
baseball field preparation, porter services, and parking lot sweeping to ensure a clean and professional
appearance. We focus on creating sustainable landscapes that thrive in all seasons.
Tree Care
Our certified arborists provide expert tree management, including trimming, removal, stump grinding,
and disease treatment. Utilizing advanced GIS tree mapping, we offer tailored growth and maintenance
programs for urban forests and individual trees alike. These services not only ensure the safety and health
of trees but also enhance their contribution to the environment and aesthetics of any property. By
integrating technology and expertise, we help preserve the natural canopy, ensuring long-term
sustainability for both urban and rural spaces.
Landscape Construction
We transform outdoor spaces into functional, visually stunning environments. From site preparation,
grading, and drainage to strategic planting and native plant rehabilitation, we focus on integrating
aesthetics with sustainability. Our portfolio includes durable parks, playgrounds, and athletic fields
designed for both community engagement and environmental balance.
• Tree Trimming & Pruning • On-site Diagnosis
• Hazardous Tree Removal • Long-term Tree Care
• Stump Grinding &
Disposal
• GIS Tree Mapping & Asset
Management
• Tree Disease & Pest
Treatment
• Tree Planting
• Turf Management • Irrigation Management
• Integrated Pest
Management
• Seasonal Planting &
Enhancements
• Athletic Turf Maintenance • Porter Services
• Parking Lot Sweeping
• Color Design
• Clean-up and Debris Removal
• Site Preparation & Grading
• Native Plant Restoration
• Playground Construction
• Irrigation Systems Installation
• Park Construction
• Tree, Shrub & Ground
Cover Planting
• Park Construction
• Athletic Field Construction
• Drainage System Setup
Page 405
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 12
Irrigation Retrofits
Modern irrigation systems are key to sustainable water management. Our retrofit solutions include
weather-responsive controllers, high-efficiency sprinklers, and precision drip irrigation systems. These
upgrades ensure optimized water use, reduced runoff, and compliance with regulatory requirements, all
while delivering significant cost savings. We also provide system performance monitoring and proactive
maintenance to maximize efficiency and extend system lifespan.
Drought-Tolerant Conversions
As water conservation becomes increasingly important, our drought-tolerant landscape conversions help
clients adapt effectively. By incorporating native plants, soil enhancements, drip irrigation, and functional
hardscape features like pathways and seating, we create sustainable, low-maintenance landscapes that
reduce water usage and improve environmental outcomes. These eco-friendly designs also enhance
property value and promote biodiversity, contributing to a greener community.
Hardscape Construction
Hardscapes play a vital role in enhancing landscape functionality and aesthetics. Our services include
custom concrete work, masonry, stonework, flagstone, and tile installations. We focus on integrating
these elements seamlessly into existing landscapes, ensuring durability and timeless appeal.
Complementing these are drainage systems, overhead structures, water features, and low-voltage
lighting, creating safe and inviting outdoor spaces with a unique visual appeal.
At Mariposa Landscapes, our commitment extends beyond delivering services; we aim to craft
environments that leave lasting impressions. From sustainable designs to innovative technologies, our
work reflects a blend of functionality, beauty, and environmental responsibility. With every project, we
strive to exceed expectations, creating landscapes that serve as vibrant spaces for communities to thrive.
• Custom Concrete Features
• Water Features
• Monuments
• Overhead Structures
Installation
• Masonry
• Stonework
• Low-voltage Lighting
• Drainage Systems
• Irrigation System Upgrades • Leak Detection & Repair
• Zone Adjustments • Drip Irrigation Installation
• Real-Time Monitoring
• System Performance
Assessments
• Compliance with Water
Regulations
• Plant Selection • Site Assessment & Analysis
• Soil Enhancement • Drip Irrigation Installation
• Mulching and Ground
Cover Application
• Hardscape Integration
• Water Conservation Design
Page 406
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 13
Quality Control Program
At Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., quality control is not just a process, it’s a philosophy. Rooted in the principle
of "Plan your work and work your plan," our Quality Control Program is designed to ensure every project
exceeds client expectations. We proactively manage quality and systematically address issues, we free up
our clients’ representatives - such as Public Works Inspectors or Property Managers - so they can focus on
higher priorities. This approach fosters a positive working relationship and ensures consistent, high-
quality results.
Key Components of the Quality Control Program
Our Quality Control Program is built on a foundation of structured processes and proactive management,
ensuring every aspect of our work meets the highest standards. The following components outline how
we maintain excellence at every stage of the project.
Quality Control Aspect How It Ensures Excellence
Work-in-Process
Inspections
Account Managers conduct initial and ongoing inspections of work tasks to
ensure compliance with quality standards. Non-conformances are logged and
addressed immediately.
Systematic Problem
Resolution
Issues are contained and corrected promptly, with solutions that include repair,
replacement, or rework. Completed work is re-inspected to prevent recurrence.
Management
Monitoring
Supervisors oversee operations to ensure adherence to quality plans, leveraging
structured problem-solving methods and enhanced process controls.
Client Feedback
Integration
Regular communication with clients ensures alignment on quality expectations
and facilitates continuous improvement.
Implementation Process
Core Objectives
• Consistency: Deliver uniform, high-quality results across all projects and service areas.
• Proactive Problem-Solving: Address potential issues early to prevent disruptions.
• Client Satisfaction: Build trust by meeting deadlines and maintaining transparency.
• Continuous Improvement: Refine processes based on feedback and data to enhance future
performance.
Monthly Work Plans
Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed
Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance
tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical
applications. This plan is reviewed and approved
during the monthly client meeting and correlates with
the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule
Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current
month’s performance.
Irrigation Reports
The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled
inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in
an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes
all service requests, emergency work, and repairs.
The Account Manager ensures these reports are
accurate and delivered to the client representative
on time.
1 2
Page 407
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 14
Advanced Tools and Technology
Our team leverages cutting-edge tools and technologies to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of
our Quality Control Program.
• Digital Inspection Checklists streamline the reporting process, allowing for real-time tracking and
immediate feedback on service performance. These checklists ensure that quality standards are
consistently upheld and any issues are promptly addressed.
• GIS Mapping Systems provide precise asset inventories, enabling accurate management of trees,
irrigation systems, and other landscape elements. By visualizing and analyzing these assets,
Mariposa ensures optimized resource allocation and improved service outcomes.
Our quality control philosophy focuses on preemptive action and systematic improvement, ensuring
issues are addressed efficiently and resolved through structured processes. This approach is exemplified
in our Sample Inspection Form and Inspection Action Items Form, which document inspections,
corrective actions, and follow-up measures to maintain the highest standards.
Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time. Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time. Each month, the Account Manager submits a detailed Monthly Work Plan outlining scheduled maintenance tasks, such as trimming, pruning, and chemical applications. This plan is reviewed and approved during the monthly client meeting and correlates with the Annual Work Schedule. A Monthly Schedule Evaluation Form is completed to assess the current month’s performance. The Irrigation Technician conducts scheduled inspections of irrigation systems, logging results in an Irrigation Inspection Report. This report includes all service requests, emergency work, and repairs. The Account Manager ensures these reports are accurate and delivered to the client representative on time.
Work Quality Evaluations
Communication is critical to aligning interpretations of
quality. Before regular meetings, the Mariposa
Supervisor and client representative independently
grade the landscape’s quality using a standard
evaluation form. Any discrepancies are addressed
during the meeting to ensure mutual understanding of
expectations.
Action Item Lists
During inspections or meetings, any requests,
concerns, or additional tasks are documented in an
Action Item List with a clear target completion
date. This approach ensures timely resolution,
fosters client confidence, and promotes
transparent communication by tracking progress
and accountability.
3 4
Page 408
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 15
3.5 Project Team
Key personnel for this contract
Roberto Perez - Branch Manager
With over 25 years of experience, Roberto Perez is an expert in large-
scale public works landscape maintenance. His background as a public
works inspector provides him with valuable insight into regulatory
compliance, quality control, and efficiency improvements in municipal
and commercial landscaping projects.
Robert has been with the company for about 3 years. Before that, he
was with various city within southern California, specializing in
managing landscape contracts.
Robert, has been managing similar works for many years. A more
current notable work includes with the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Chino Hills, Fontana, Moreno Valley, San Bernardino County, Riverside
County, Etc.
Role in the Project: Account/Project Manager
Length of time with the company: 4 Years
Years of Experience: Over 30 years
Position with the company: Branch Manager
Experience, Educational Background, Licenses and Certifications:
• Graduate of the Pacific Southwest Maintenance Management School
• MSAC Irrigation Design and Plant ID Certificate
• Leadership Academy Certificate, Cal Poly Pomona
• Calsense 3000 Certified
Ongoing Training
• Continuous OSHA safety training
• Qualified Applicator License – In Process
• Cal State Fullerton Water Auditor – In Process
Work History:
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Fontana
• City of Chino Hills
Page 409
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 16
Dirk Bennett - Account Manager
With over 11 years of experience, Dirk Bennett will be the person in-
charge and responsible for project management, communication with
foreman, field supervisor and primary contact with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. He is experience in conducting and overseeing Public
Works, Commercial and Residential landscape maintenance work.
With a vast experience in all aspects of Landscape maintenance
Dirk has been with the company for about 3.5 years.
Dirk has been managing the City of Rancho Cucamonga contract(s) for
Mariposa Landscapes. His extensive experience with scheduling and
understanding of the City's needs has proven him to be a reliable lead.
Role in the Project: Supervision, Billing and Consultation
Length of time with the company: 3 Years
Years of Experience: Over 11 years
Position with the company: Maintenance Account Manager
Experience, Educational Background, Licenses and Certifications:
• Qualified Applicators License, Cat B, #145235
• Horticulture and Turf Grass Management certificate, Mt. San Jacinto College.
• Safe Work Zone, trained.
• CPR and Safety trained.
• OSHA 10 Hour – Construction Safety
• Recycled Water Site Supervisor Certified, Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Ongoing Training
• Horticulture, arboriculture Turf Management certificate, Mt. San Jacinto College/ San Antonio
College.
• Integrated Pest Management continuation training.
• Weathertrack – Hydropoint controller management Company safety training
• Qualified Pesticide Applicators continuation training.
• Cal Sense controller management Company safety training
Work History:
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• Jurupa Community Service District
Page 410
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 17
3.6 Staffing Levels
Please see attached Schedule lV for estimated minimum labor hours.
The labor hours do not indicate the maximum labor that we will provide. We are anticipating providing
labor as necessary to get the work done.
Extra Work project will be assigned to additional staff and not from the proposed routine staff members.
Page 411
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 18
3.7 Third-Party/Subcontractors
Mariposa Landscapes Inc. will not use any subcontractors for this contract.
Page 412
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 19
3.8 Proposal Response
Mariposa Landscapes will deliver consistent, high-quality landscape maintenance across LMD 6R, 9 and
10 parkways, paseos and medians in Rancho Cucamonga. Our staffing plan and daily operations are
structured to meet all contractual requirements while providing additional value where needed. Staffing
will differ slightly depending on the service level.
Crew Deployment:
• Detail Crew (3 personnel):
o Handles planter maintenance, edging, trimming shrubs and groundcover, trash pickup,
and hardscape cleaning.
o Crew floats between properties daily based on rotation schedule and seasonal needs.
• Mowing Crew (2 personnel):
o Responsible for turf areas.
o Equipped with 60" mulching mowers to maintain weekly mowing cycles per service level
A and B requirements.
o Crew rotates across designated properties Monday through Friday to meet weekly
schedule requirements.
• Irrigation Technician (1 Personnel)
o Responsible for irrigation maintenance throughout specified LMDs for this contract.
• Spray Technician (1 Personnel)
o Responsible for any annual chemical application as required per service level.
Page 413
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 20
Workplan and Approach
The schedule outlined below is subject to change and requires approval from the designated
representatives. Any adjustments will be made to align with operational requirements. At the
commencement of the contract, our Project Manager will submit the annual schedule, and a monthly
report will be provided at the start of each month for the representatives.
Weekly Average
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Weed Removal X X X X X
Litter Removal X X X X X
Irrigation System Inspection X
Turf Mowing, Edging, Trimming X
Pruning, Trimming X X X X X
Yearly Average
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Weed Removal WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Litter Removal WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Irrigation System
Inspection WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Lawn Mowing,
Edging,
Trimming
WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK WK
Herbicide, Pest
Control
x x x x x x
Pruning MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO
Fertilize Turf x x x x
Mulching AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN
*AN = as needed *MO = monthly *WK = weekly *BI= Biweekly *DY = Daily *2X/DY = 2 times a day
Page 414
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 21
Project Specific Equipment
Mariposa Landscapes Inc. is proud to maintain a modern fleet, consisting of the latest models of vehicles
and equipment, including all the essential tools needed to fulfill our contract work. Our fleet is under five
years old and is meticulously maintained by our in-house mechanics. Notably, we offer large-capacity
mowing equipment, a unique advantage that sets us apart from most competitors.
To ensure reliable service, we employ a full team of skilled mechanics, and we maintain an extensive
inventory of backup equipment, which allows us to consistently adhere to our project schedules.
Each of our crew trucks is fully equipped with all necessary hand tools for landscape maintenance, along
with a First Aid kit, water, and clear instructions in the event of an accident. Our mechanics are
strategically stationed within 30 to 60 minutes of each project site, ensuring rapid response times. In
addition, we have backup 72” and 21” mowers available for deployment within one hour, further
reinforcing our ability to maintain schedule continuity.
We are confident that the equipment detailed in our proposal will provide comprehensive coverage and
surpass the city’s established standards. Our commitment to excellence is demonstrated through our
meticulous selection of resources and skilled personnel. Mariposa Landscape Inc. is dedicated to ensuring
that every aspect of our work exemplifies the highest quality, reflecting both our expertise and our
commitment to delivering superior results. We believe that our approach will not only meet but exceed
the expectations set forth, showcasing our dedication to excellence and reinforcing our reputation for
exceptional service.
Anticipated Equipment
Equipment will vary based on service level.
Regular Vehicles Periodic Vehicles
QTY Vehicles QTY Vehicles
1
2
1
Truck Toyota Tacoma w/Irrigation Setup
Truck Chevy 2500HD, Dbl Cab, Landscape body
Truck Chevy 3500HD, Single Cab, Spray Truck
1
Regular Equipment Periodic Equipment
QTY Equipment QTY Equipment
2
2
2
1
1
Trimmer String (Weedeater)
Blower backpack
Hedge Trimmer 51” Long Staff
Edger Stick Type
Truck and Tools Equipment
1
1
1
Trailer 82” x 16”, GVWR 7000, Mow Crew
Mower 60in, Recycler
Aerator Walkhebind
Page 415
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 22
Extra Work Pricing
When a customer desires additional work or an emergency arises where work above and beyond the
contract scope becomes necessary, there must be some mechanism to quickly communicate and agree
upon the cost. Many times, situations arise where it is difficult to come up with a cost ahead of time. We
solve that issue with the following:
Our process is designed to ensure
clarity and professionalism, founded
on the principles of Simplicity,
Transparency, Honesty, and No
Surprises.
If an issue arises that alters the scope
of the original estimate, we will
revise the proposal accordingly and
resubmit it for client approval. The
updated proposal will include clear
explanations and supporting
documentation, such as photos.
Work will not proceed until the client
has reviewed and approved the
revised scope and associated costs,
ensuring full agreement before
moving forward.
4-Step Pricing Process
1. The scope of work is identified, and a "Not-to-Exceed" proposal is prepared.
2. The customer reviews and approves the proposal.
3. Work proceeds, with labor tracked and receipts documented.
4. Billing will never exceed the original proposal and will be either equal to or less than
the proposed amount.
The sample proposal to the right
pertains to an irrigation-related
project, where multiple valves
require replacement due to damage
sustained in an auto accident.
Page 416
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 23
Continual Employee Training
The Certified Landscape Technician Test is widely regarded as one of the most challenging exams across
any industry. It is a timed, hands-on field test that covers a wide range of skills and disciplines essential
for landscape work. Three certifications can be earned through this test: Certified Landscape Technician
in Landscape, Maintenance, and Irrigation. Each category has its own specific modules, but all candidates
must pass a core set of 13 modules. Employees at Mariposa not only maintain their current CLT skills but
are also continuously working to expand their knowledge and pursue further certifications.
Core Elements
1.02 - First Aid and Safety
1.03 - Plan Reading
1.05 - Plant Identification
1.06 - Sod Installation
1.07 - Work Orders and Reports
1.08 - Program Controller
1.09 - Irrigation Identification
1.10 - Lateral Repair and Head Adjustment
1.11 - Truck & Trailer
1.12 - Tree Planting and Staking/Guying
1.14 - Chainsaw
Landscape Maintenance Elements
3.01 - Written General Comprehension
3.02 - Pruning
3.03 - 21” Mower
3.04 – Intermediate Walk-Behind Mower
3.05 - Aerator
3.06 - Edger & Trimmer
3.07 - Riding Mower
3.08 - Pesticides
3.09 - Fertilizer
3.10 - Power Blower
1.14 - Chainsaw
Irrigation Elements
4.01 - Irrigation General Comprehension
4.02 - Irrigation Plan Reading
4.03 - Lateral Installation
4.04 - Mainline Installation
4.05 - Valve Repair
4.06 - Valve Wiring
4.07 - Pipe Installation Equipment
1.14 - Chainsaw
Page 417
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 24
Safety
Employee safety is our highest priority. At Mariposa Landscapes, we have implemented thorough and
continuous safety training for all our employees. We have specially designed intensive training programs
for new and onboarding employees that include both on-site training and classroom sessions.
Furthermore, all employees are required to participate in ongoing training sessions to prevent accidents,
ensure the safe handling of equipment, and develop their judgment in anticipating hazards before they
occur. Additionally, on new sites or sites new to the employees, a supervisor conducts site-specific risk
prevention training focusing on the most frequent hazards and risks known to the site and region.
Employee Training & Supervision
Our safety program is built on thorough employee training
and supervision, with the main objective to ensure a safe
work environment through well-prepared personnel.
Training begins within the first 3 days of employment,
following a structured agenda that covers orientation,
safety basics, equipment and chemical safety, and
practical training and review. This initial training covers
the use of equipment, chemicals, supplys, and protective
gear. To maintain high safety standards, ongoing training
is provided weekly and bi-monthly, ensuring all employees
stay up-to-date with the latest safety protocols.
Training in the Use of Supplies, Chemicals and Equipment
We divide this training session into the following modules:
Supplies & Chemicals Equipment
Safety Basics All exposed employees receive
training on chemical safety
fundamentals, including hazard
identification, labeling systems,
proper storage, and interpreting
Safety Data Sheets to understand
chemical properties and risks.
Familiarization This training covers the proper use
of equipment, including chainsaws,
hedge trimmers, edgers, blowers,
mowers, and trailers, with an
overview of each machine's
functions, common uses, and
associated risks.
Safe Handling Comprehensive guidelines are
established for safely handling
herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers,
and cleaning agents. Employees are
trained on safe mixing, application,
storage, correct application rates,
and the importance of proper
ventilation.
Operational
Safety
This session covers the safe
operation of equipment, including
start-up, shutdown, proper use,
and safety checks. It focuses on
recognizing and avoiding hazards
like chainsaw kickback, trimmer
debris, and mower rollover risks.
Emergency Training includes protocols for spills,
leaks and exposure incidents so
employees can act quickly and
mitigate risks in a timely manner.
Maintenance &
Inspection
In this module we cover instruction
on routine and maintenance tasks,
such as sharpening blades,
changing oil and inspecting and
recognizing wear and tear.
Figure 2: Training on the Use of Supplies, Chemicals and Equipment
Figure 1: Employee Training Held On-site
Page 418
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 25
All of our training and safety sessions are led by our highly qualified supervisors or safety coordinators
who have been previously trained in safe and correct operating procedures and are determined by
competent management. All trainers have undergone certification from recognized agencies such as the
California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the American Heart Association. Trainers are selected
based on their expertise and ability to communicate effectively.
Protective Equipment
Our PPE program includes detailed instructions on the types of protective equipment required for various
tasks, as well as proper usage techniques and maintenance procedures to ensure equipment stays
effective. We follow strict internal protective equipment protocols and conduct regular unannounced site
inspection to verify that all PPE is in good condition and worn properly. All employees must wear the
appropriate PPE pictured below and in the following page. Workers wear appropriate PPEs as needed,
where job safety requires it.
Ongoing Training
Ongoing and continuous training are of great importance to our company. We hold weekly meetings
designed to keep employees updated on specific seasonal hazards (for instance, when we have noticed
an increase in snake sightings), new equipment, site-specific risks or updated safety practices regarding
chemicals or equipment used. Our supervisors hold regular evaluations to reinforce safety protocols and
accident prevention but also to improve performance.
Aside from our weekly meetings, we hold bi-monthly long-format sessions which last from 2-3 hours and
provide insights, feedback and learnings from new job sites and new site challenges. In these sessions,
new materials and chemicals are being discussed and introduced to the team. Equipment training
courses are often held separately or in smaller groups. Supervisors and trainers conduct daily
inspections to identify and reduce potential hazards, ensuring compliance with safety procedures. Their
checklists cover proper PPE usage and protocols, equipment condition, chemical storage, and work zone
setup. All findings and learnings are then discussed in our bi-monthly meeting and focus on areas where
improvements can be made. Employees are encouraged to provide feedback on safety practices, helping
to identify new hazards and refine training programs.
Page 419
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 26
Page 420
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 27
Green Initiative
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. is dedicated to implementing environmentally sustainable practices and energy
conservation measures. We operate a comprehensive recycling program for green waste and paper
products, which is enforced at both our local offices and all job sites.
Our company currently uses hybrid vehicles and is actively researching and pursuing the adoption of
hybrid equipment for use on our contracts. We are committed to being as environmentally responsible as
possible and are continuously expanding our operations to meet this goal.
Mariposa Landscapes has earned certification from the American Green Zone Alliance under the
Sustainable Land Care Certification (Electric Equipment). This certification ensures we are at the forefront
of industry advancements, selecting cost-effective solutions with the latest commercial-grade electric
small equipment.
We collaborate closely with clients to optimize water usage wherever possible. With hundreds of ET
“Smart” Controller installations over the years, we are proficient in assessing properties for water-saving
opportunities, providing tailored solutions, and programming these advanced irrigation devices for
maximum efficiency.
Beyond these initiatives, we remain committed to leading the industry in minimizing environmental
impact and advancing sustainable practices.
The key points of its strategy to achieve this are:
• Minimize waste by evaluating operations and ensuring they are as efficient as possible.
• Minimize toxic emissions through the selection and use of its fleet and equipment.
• Actively promote recycling both internally and amongst its customers and suppliers.
• Meet or exceed all the environmental legislation that relates to the Company.
• Adhere to all local codes and ordinances regarding water conservation.
Page 421
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 28
Integrated Pest Management Program
Integrated pest management (IPM) is an
ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on
long-term prevention of pests or their
damage through a combination of
techniques such as biological control,
habitat manipulation, modification of
cultural practices, and use of resistant
varieties. Pesticides are used only after
monitoring indicates they are needed
according to established guidelines, and
treatments are made with the goal of
removing only the target organism. Pest
control materials are selected and applied in
a manner that minimizes risks to human
health, beneficial and non-target organisms,
and the environment.
Biological Control Biological control is the use of natural enemies—predators,
parasites, pathogens, and competitors—to control pests and their
damage. Though Mariposa does not introduce any beneficial
organisms into the environment, we do identify and encourage
their presence.
Cultural Controls Cultural controls are practices that reduce pest establishment,
reproduction, dispersal, and survival. For example, changing
irrigation practices can reduce pest problems, since too much
water can increase root disease and weeds.
Mechanical & Physical
Controls
Mechanical and physical controls kill a pest directly or make the
environment unsuitable for it. Traps for rodents are examples of
mechanical control. Physical controls include mulches for weed
management, steam sterilization of the soil for disease
management, or barriers such as screens to keep birds or insects
out.
Chemical Controls Chemical control is the use of pesticides. Mariposa Landscapes
uses pesticides only when needed and in combination with other
approaches for more effective, long-term control. Also, pesticides
are selected and applied in a way that minimizes their possible
harm to people and the environment. With IPM we use the most
selective pesticide that will do the job and be the safest for other
organisms and for air, soil, and water quality.
Step 2
Prevention
Step 3
Observation
Step 4
Intervention
Step 5
Evaluation
& Planning
Step 1
Knowledge
Page 422
Safety • Teamwork • Quality • Integrity 29
1
2
3
4
5
Job Start Up
Contract Execution and Official Notice to Proceed
For new contracts, we need a signed commitment before purchasing trucks and equipment. Startups
within 30 days may face supply chain delays, so we prefer a 60 to 90-day lead time. During this period, we
may have meetings with the client to introduce the team and review the schedule. We also use this time
to prepare area maps, take measurements, and order necessary materials like fertilizer, weed control
products, and other supplies.
Job Start
On the first day of the project, our crews will be equipped with detailed maps, task lists, and an initial
schedule. Our management team is actively involved in logistics at this stage. We also conduct a thorough
inspection of the irrigation systems with our technicians. If any issues, such as broken or inoperative
components, are identified, we will create a detailed list of required repairs, including pricing and a
completion schedule for the customer.
30-Day Evaluation
At the 30-day mark, we will hold a special evaluation meeting with the customer. This meeting addresses
aspects of the project that may not have been fully outlined in the scope or specifications, such as
customized timelines, work sequences, and specific site needs. We will review the progress so far, identify
successes, and discuss any areas requiring adjustment. The customer will receive an action plan with clear
timelines for any necessary changes, along with an updated irrigation system inspection.
60-Day Evaluation
By the 60-day point, we expect operations to be running smoothly and in line with expectations. We will
conduct a customer survey to assess their experience with the proposal process, the transition to
operations, and overall job performance. Our goal is to achieve the highest satisfaction score possible and
ensure complete customer satisfaction.
90-Day Evaluation
At the 90-day mark, the customer will receive a survey with a single question: "Would you recommend
Mariposa Landscapes to other customers right now?" Our goal is to receive an enthusiastic “Yes”
response, confirming their satisfaction and confidence in our services.
Notice to
Proceed Job Start
30-Day
Evaluation 60-Day
Evaluation
90-Day
Evaluation
Page 423
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Non-Construction Procurement
Bid Results for Project Request for Proposals (RFP) #25/26-003 for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6r, 9, and 10, Parkways, Paseos, and Medians (Request for Proposals (RFP) #25/26-003 for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance LMD 6r, 9, and 10, P)
Issued on 04/21/2025
Bid Due on June 11, 2025 9:00 AM (PDT)
Exported on 07/28/2025
Line Totals (Unit Price * Quantity)
Item Num Section Description Unit of Measure Quantity Mariposa Landscapes Inc.
1 Service Level A - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 922929 $23,719.28
2 Service Level A - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 178257 $3,119.50
3 Service Level A - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 238489 $1,430.93
Subtotal $28,269.71
4 Service Level A - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 181595 $5,248.10
5 Service Level A - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 150732 $904.39
Subtotal $6,152.49
6 Service Level A - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 317728 $9,150.57
7 Service Level A - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level A f Monthly co 135570 $813.42
Subtotal $9,963.99
8 Service Level B - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 922929 $23,719.28
9 Service Level B - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 178257 $2,780.81
10 Service Level B - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 238489 $1,287.84
Subtotal $27,787.93
11 Service Level B - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 181595 $4,666.99
12 Service Level B - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 150732 $813.95
Subtotal $5,480.94
13 Service Level B - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 317728 $8,165.61
14 Service Level B - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level B f Monthly co 135570 $732.08
Subtotal $8,897.69
15 Service Level C - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 922929 $22,704.05
16 Service Level C - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 178257 $2,673.86
17 Service Level C - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 238489 $1,240.14
Subtotal $26,618.05
18 Service Level C - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 181595 $4,467.24
19 Service Level C - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 150732 $783.81
Subtotal $5,251.04
20 Service Level C - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 317728 $7,816.11
21 Service Level C - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level C f Monthly co 135570 $704.96
Subtotal $8,521.07
22 Service Level D - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 922929 $19,935.27
23 Service Level D - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 178257 $2,317.34
24 Service Level D - LMD 6R Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 238489 $1,097.05
Subtotal $23,349.66
25 Service Level D - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 181595 $3,940.61
26 Service Level D - LMD 9 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 150732 $693.37
Subtotal $4,633.98
27 Service Level D - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 317728 $6,894.70
28 Service Level D - LMD 10 Continuous Landscape Maintenance at Service Level D f Monthly co 135570 $623.62
Subtotal $7,518.32
29 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Plant 5 Gallon Tree and Stake EA 1 $53.56
30 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Plant 15 Gallon Tree and Stake EA 1 $172.01
31 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Plant 1 Gallon Shrub EA 1 $17.51
32 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Plant 5 Gallon Shrub EA 1 $46.35
33 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Plant 1 Flat Ground Cover EA 1 $46.35
34 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Prep, Place and Grade Mulch CY 1 $77.25
35 Planting, Mulch and DG Un Prep, Place, Compact and Grade DG CY 1 $154.50
Subtotal $567.53
36 Labor Rates Landscape Maintenance Laborer - Routine HOUR 1 $46.35
37 Labor Rates Landscape Maintenance Laborer - Complex HOUR 1 $77.25
38 Labor Rates Landscape Operating Engineer HOUR 1 $154.50
39 Labor Rates Licensed or Certified Chemical Applicator HOUR 1 $77.25
40 Labor Rates Supervisor/Foreman HOUR 1 $72.10
41 Labor Rates Landscape/Irrigation Laborer HOUR 1 $133.90
42 Labor Rates Landscape Hydro Seeder HOUR 1 $133.90
43 Labor Rates Landscape/Irrigation Tender HOUR 1 $87.55
Subtotal $782.80
44 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal with Stump Grind: 0" to 3"EA 1 $144.20
45 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal with Stump Grind: >3" to 12"EA 1 $592.25
46 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal with Stump Grind: >12" to 24"EA 1 $1,328.70
47 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal with Stump Grind: >24" to 36"EA 1 $2,513.20
48 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal with Stump Grind: >36"EA 1 $4,439.30
49 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal without Stump Grind: 0" to 3"EA 1 $110.47
50 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal without Stump Grind: >3" to 12"EA 1 $518.09
51 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal without Stump Grind: >12" to 24"EA 1 $1,073.26
52 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal without Stump Grind: >24" to 36"EA 1 $2,070.30
53 Tree Removals/Grinds Tree Removal without Stump Grind: >36"EA 1 $3,701.56
54 Tree Removals/Grinds Stump Grind Only: 0" to 3"EA 1 $73.65
55 Tree Removals/Grinds Stump Grind Only: >3" to 12"EA 1 $370.80
56 Tree Removals/Grinds Stump Grind Only: >12" to 24"EA 1 $740.31
57 Tree Removals/Grinds Stump Grind Only: >24" to 36"EA 1 $1,110.34
58 Tree Removals/Grinds Stump Grind Only: >36"EA 1 $2,220.94
Subtotal $21,007.37
Total $184,802.56
Page 424
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Andy Miller, Facilities Superintendent
Lisa O'Brien, Public Works Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Cooperative Agreement for Stadium Modernization
Improvements for FY 25/26 with Rancho Baseball LLC (DBH) and
Request for an Appropriation of $275,000 to Complete the Identified
Improvements for FY 25/26. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement Amendment No. 1 for
the Stadium Modernization Improvement for FY 25/26 with Rancho Baseball LLC (DBH) and
request for an appropriation of $275,000 in the City’s Capital Reserve Fund to complete the
identified improvements for FY 25/26.
BACKGROUND:
In 1992, Valley Baseball Club, Inc. entered into a Lease Agreement with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to lease City-owned property at the Adult Sports Complex for the development and
operations of the Quakes minor league baseball team. The original agreement was modified on
thirteen (13) separate occasions over the first seven (7) years and was scheduled to terminate on
September 20, 2002.
On August 18, 1999, the City and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. approved an Amended and Restated
Lease, extending the period of the lease through September 30, 2012. The lease agreement was
modified six (6) times. On July 15, 2009, the City Council approved an Assignment and
Assumption of Lease and Consent to Lease Agreement between Valley Baseball Club, Inc.,
Rancho Baseball LLC and the City, which transferred the current lease agreement to the team’s
new owners, Rancho Baseball, LLC (Quakes).
In 2011, the lease Agreement was amended a seventh time to cover a period of ten (10) years,
with an option to renew the lease for five (5) more years, commencing on October 1, 2021, with
two (2) amendments, the first in 2018 for the inclusion of additional signage within the stadium,
and the second in 2023 to address parking spaces and concessions as well as replace the
rightfield scoreboard.
In October 2022, Rancho Baseball LLC approached the City with new Major League Baseball
(MLB) requirements for all Player Development League (PDL) stadiums, including LoanMart
Field, home of the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes. The City and Rancho Baseball negotiated a
Page 425
Page 2
3
0
1
3
new lease to supersede all previous leases, which was approved by the City Council on July 17,
2024, which agreed to broad terms for the substantial improvements to the stadium.
In October 2024, Council approved execution of a Cooperative Agreement and authorized an
appropriation of $1,000,000 for identified improvements needed to LoanMart Stadium to comply
with the MLB Professional Development League requirements including: expanding the home
and visiting clubhouse, and the construction of a female staff locker room and workout facility.
The Cooperative Agreement identified that Rancho Baseball, LLC would manage, arrange,
supervise and coordinate the development services and master planning services for the stadium
improvements as an independent contractor. Per the agreement Rancho Baseball provided the
City a monthly progress report on the project improvements noted and was reimbursed monthly
based on the monthly draw request for costs incurred.
ANALYSIS:
The fiscal year 2025/2026 Major Projects and Programs identifies two (2) funded LoanMart Field
improvement projects: Quakes Stadium Upgrade Project ($1.6 million) and Quakes Stadium Bowl
Waterproofing Project–Phase II ($650k). The Quakes Stadium Upgrade Project scope includes
the installation of the following improvements needed to continue to meet the MLB Professional
Development League stadium requirements: air-conditioned batter’s tunnels, home and visitor
bullpens, and outfield batters’ eye. The Quakes Stadium Bowl Waterproofing Project-Phase II
includes the following for the upper bowl: completion of joint caulking and sealing, and
replacement of expansion joints.
Staff recommends both identified Quake Stadium projects be completed by amending the
Cooperative Agreement with Rancho Baseball LLC(now DBH). The recommended Amendment
No. 1 would allow for DBH to: oversee, administer and manage the design and construction of
both these projects. This recommendation will ensure these two projects are completed within
the non-season window of October 2025-March 2026 and ensure LoanMart Field is compliant
with MLB Professional Development League requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 25/26 funding which is already appropriated for the Quakes Stadium Upgrade Project
($1,600,000) and Quakes Stadium Bowl Waterproofing Phase II($650,000), totals $2,250,000.
Recent informal bids were obtained for both projects. Based on the results of these informal bids
the total cost to complete both projects is $2,519,891; this is also the project cost identified in the
proposed Amendment No. 1.
Staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $275,000 in the City’s Capital Reserve Fund
(F025|CC312|SC2106|PID-2168-025) to complete the two projects and ensure the improvements
are completed on time for the 2026 MLB season.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed Cooperative Agreement Amendment No. 1 is in alignment with the City Council’s
Core Values of: building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, intentionally embracing
and anticipating our future, and relentless pursuit of improvement.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Cooperative Agreement Amendment No. 1
Page 426
3142605
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR STADIUM
MODERNIZATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO
BASEBALL, L.L.C.
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to Cooperative Agreement for Stadium
Modernization between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) and Rancho Baseball, L.L.C.
(“Rancho Baseball”), is made and entered into this 3rd day of September, 2025.
A. Recitals.
(i) City owns certain real property located generally at 8408 Rochester Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga, on which City constructed a baseball field, stadium, and ancillary parking
facilities for use by a professional baseball club participating in the Professional Development
League (“PDL”) System (such real property and facilities thereon are hereinafter collectively
referred to as the “Stadium”).
(ii) In 2011, City and Rancho Baseball entered into an amended and restated lease
regarding Rancho Baseball’s use of the Stadium for the purpose of carrying on a professional
baseball club owned by Rancho Baseball, the “Rancho Cucamonga Quakes”, and operating
concession stands and conducting other related baseball activities. Thereafter, City and Rancho
Baseball negotiated a new lease which would extend Rancho Baseball’s use of the Stadium into
2038.
(iii) On or about October 15, 2024, City and Rancho Baseball entered into that certain
agreement entitled “Cooperative Agreement for Stadium Modernization” (“Agreement”),
whereby Rancho Baseball would construct various improvements to the Stadium in order to
bring the Stadium into compliance with the standards currently established by the Major League
Baseball Professional Development Leagues, L.L.C. (“MLB PDL”), for PDL clubs
(collectively, the “Project”). The Project specifically includes expanding the home and visiting
clubhouse, and the construction of a female staff locker room and workout facility.
(iv) On or about November 15, 2024, Rancho Baseball and affiliates entered into
an Asset Purchase Agreement with DBH Rancho Cucamonga, L.L.C., and affiliates (“DBH”),
whereby Rancho Baseball agreed to assign to DBH all of Rancho Baseball’s right, title, and
interest in the Agreement and above-referenced lease. On or about January 10, 2025, Rancho
Baseball and DBH executed the foregoing assignment.
(v) Subsequent to the City and Rancho Baseball entering the Agreement, MLB PDL
required certain additional Stadium playing field improvements consisting of precision leveling
to address proper water run-off. Proper leveling requires professional geotechnical,
topographical, surveying and mapping services, along with precision grading. The foregoing
field leveling activities are hereinafter referred to as the “Additional Improvements” and are
more fully described herein.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 427
2
(vi) It is the intent of City and DBH in entering this Amendment No. 1, to set forth
terms and conditions by which DBH will oversee, administer, and manage the design and
construction of the Additional Improvements.
B. Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and conditions
contained herein, the parties agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1. All references in the Agreement to “Rancho Baseball, L.L.C.” or “Developer”,
shall mean and refer to DBH Rancho Cucamonga, L.L.C., where the context permits or requires.
2. Exhibit “A” (Description of the Project - Facility Standards) to the Agreement, is
hereby amended by adding the following: professional services including topographical,
surveying and mapping services, and design/construction services for installation of a batting
tunnel, bullpens, batter’s eye and stadium bowl waterproofing of the Stadium, all as more fully
described in Attachment “A” hereto and which is incorporated by reference herein.
3. Exhibit “B” (Initial Approved Budget) to the Agreement is hereby amended by
adding each of the amounts set forth in Attachment “B” hereto which is incorporated by
reference herein, to the “Total Project Cost” as set forth under the “Project Cost Summary”.
Those amounts represent the total, all-inclusive cost of the Additional Improvements, including
payment and performance bonds and insurance (professional liability, commercial general, auto,
builder’s risk, and workers compensation).
4. Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1, as of the
date first written above.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DBH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, L.L.C.
By: __________________________ By: _____________________________
Print Name: ___________________ By: _____________________________
Title: ________________________ Title: ____________________________
Page 428
3
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
Phase 1 - LoanMart Field 2026 MLB Compliance General Scope
Upgrades to existing Minor League, MLB-affiliated, Low-A ballpark for PDL compliance at
batting tunnels (Section 5.6), home, visitor bullpens (section 7.4) and OF batters’ eye (section
7.6.3) and prior to start of 2026 season by late March 2026.
The following represents the general project scope for the 2026 facility improvements proposed
at LoanMart Field for compliance to MLB facility standards. It addresses the deficiencies
outlined in the 2021 MLB Facility Audit. The information has been revised since June 2025
based on subsequent meetings with Quakes Baseball / Diamond Baseball Holdings and the MLB
review by Ewing Cole dated August 19, 2026 of the design drawings prepared by AO Architects
dated August 01, 2025 that illustrate the following:
· Starting construction on or about October 15, 2025 with a substantial completion date of
March 25, 2026.
· Compliant to MLB facility standards. Referring to MLB facility audit and rubric.
· Utilizing prevailing wages with certified payroll.
· Demo existing Left Field patio area including existing batting structure, concrete slab,
stairs, ramp, field fencing, area drains, etc as needed to place the new work.
· Demo existing home (3B) and visitor (1B) bullpen area beyond existing cantinas and patio
areas into the playing field within the existing warning track (15LF approx.) zone down
towards each foul pole & outfield fence as needed to place the new work. Home side
includes demo of existing field fence and curb and two existing pine trees (New batting
tunnel structure to extended out towards existing alley/ curb. Visitor side keeps main slab
and curb (field verify against plans) with partial field fence demo and some concrete slab
area to also include new player seating.
· Build new two-lane covered and enclosed batting tunnel structure, with insulated walls and
ceiling, two sets of man doors at opposite ends, roll-up overhead doors, and select exterior
windows. The interior shall be outfitted with an overhead cable netting system, synthetic
turf flooring, HVAC mechanical ventilation/ air conditioning, 70fc LED lighting and
convenience electrical outlets (refer to plans and existing outlet locations). No fire
sprinklers required (AO to verify with City). Additional power service to be extended from
adjacent maintenance building and new electrical sub panel added as required. New fencing
added between existing maintenance building in Northeast corner where existing perimeter
wall to be demo’ed to secure gap between new batting tunnel structure (minimum 8’-0”
high). Exterior lighting wall packs will be placed at select locations on exterior sides. Add
sheet metal flashing against existing maintenance building to new gutter, similar to existing
design at batting tunnel building. Provide 25LF canopy attached to east side of building
along home bullpen at north end for player coverage.
· Build new concrete slab at LF patio around batting tunnel structure/ building pad including
stairs, ramp (refer to drawings to try to reuse existing ramp) and necessary metal hand
railings leading from existing LF Cantina. Add metal gate at top of landing along existing
wall/ railings. Include new area storm drainage. Blend patio, structure and new bullpen
together in LF. Adjust RF patio and fencing as shown on plans to accommodate new
bullpen configuration and player seating and shade canopy.
Page 429
4
· New 2-lane, Home Bullpen in LF/3B line with new extended concrete pony wall (approx.
42” to 48” high) from existing LF Cantina corner to existing OF wall angled for portable
batting shell/ turtle clearance, padded on field side with field gate access near LF Cantina
corner. Additional field access gate on opposite end near OF fence reworked from existing
(see plans). Includes finished grade with clay surface, mounds, plates. synthetic turf and
drainage. Plate and mound orientation will be adjusted to MLB standards. Home side to
have canopy as noted above for play seating area. No fence or barrier between bullpen or
batting structure (about 3 ft wide strip). A 6ft high fence will be added to the south end of
the bullpen, behind the plate atop the existing concrete cantina patio wall to protect from
overthrown baseballs that sits about 8’ above the concrete ramp on the patio side. Verify
existing water source / hose bib and provide as required for maintenance.
· New 2-lane, Visitor Bullpen in RF/1B line with new extended concrete pony wall (approx.
42” to 48” high) from existing RF Cantina corner to existing OF wall angled for vehicle
access, padded on field side with field gate access near RF Cantina corner. Additional field
access gate on opposite end near OF fence reworked from existing (see plans). Includes
finished grade with clay surface, mounds, plates, synthetic turf and drainage. Plate and
mound orientation will be adjusted to MLB standards. Visitor side to have 25 ft long x 8 ft
high x 5 ft deep inset fenced seating area on existing concrete patio slab with covered top
and green windscreen back and side walls for visiting player seating area. A 6ft high fence
will be added to the south end of the bullpen, behind the plate atop the existing concrete
cantina patio wall to protect from overthrown baseballs that sits about 8’ above the concrete
ramp on the patio side. Verify existing water source / hose bib and provide as required for
maintenance.
· New steel frame structure with cabling and windscreen added/ welded to existing batter’s
eye structure on left and right sides, 3’-6” each side to achieve proper MLB width at 60’-
0” and 5’-6” to the top of the existing 6 each, approximately 8” diameter steel columns to
achieve proper MLB height at 30’-0”.
· Refurbish existing upper row of outfield signage backing from LF to CF including prep,
patch and paint (field side) existing 9’-0” high plywood panels. Damaged panels to be
replaced or repaired as needed.
Phase II Quake Stadium Bowl Waterproofing – Upper Bowl
a. Horizontal caulk joints with direct foot traffic will have existing sealant applications
removed down 4” and thoroughly cleaned and prepped.
b. Areas will then receive minimal expanding spray foam covered by closed cell backer
rod; the backer rod will then be covered by bond breaker tape and topped by a ½ “
application silkaflex 1A Grey polyurethane sealant.
c. Includes removal of all seats as needed and reinstallation of seats.
Horizontal to vertical transitions and non direct foot traffic areas will be thoroughly cleaned
and prepped for the application of Silka Sealbridge 300 tape with all leading edges set into
Silkasil 295 one part neutral cure silicone.
d. All procedures executed in accordance to the manufacturer’s published guidelines.
e. Removal and disposal of existing expansion joint assemblies.
f. Prep surfaces to manufactures published guidelines.
g. Install new M seal expansion joint assemblies. Manufacturers shop drawings will be
provided prior to commencement of work. Expansion joints are approximately 5” in width.
Page 430
5
ATTACHMENT B
COST BREAKDOWN - ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
Hard Costs
Construction Costs for MLB Compliance Improvements $ 1,175,000.00
(batting tunnel, bullpens, batter's eye)
Construction Costs for Bowl Waterproofing $ 882,800.00
Construction Contingency
10% $ 205,780.00
MLB Improvements General Cost Estimate Contingency $ 22,500.00
FF&E $ 14,063.00
Hard Cost Sub-Total $ 2,300,143.00
Soft Costs for MLB Facility Compliance Improvements
Bond, Insurance $ 28,125.00
Builder's Risk Insurance $ 39,375.00
Fees & Permits $ 7,875.00
Inspection Fees $ 20,250.00
Design Fees $ 85,63000
Land Survey - Topo of existing conditions $ 19,930.00
Utility Survey $ 9,563.00
Field Investigation - Hydrovac $ 9,000.00
Soft Cost Subtotal $ 219,748.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 2,519,891.00
Page 431
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs
Jennifer Gracia, Community Services Director
Nathan Hunt, Deputy Director of Community Services
Crystal Zuniga, Community Services Superintendent
Celeste Medrano, Community Services Supervisor
Jonathan Hilton, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Execution of Amendment No. 001 to the
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Number 2021-079 Between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and CR&A Custom Inc. to Increase the Total
Not-to-Exceed Amount from $154,000 to $210,000 for the Remaining
Term of the Agreement. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
Approve Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement No. 2021-079
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and CR&A Custom Inc., increasing the total not-
to-exceed amount from $154,000 to $210,000 for the remainder of the agreement term.
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 001 and any related
ancillary documents.
BACKGROUND:
The Armed Forces Banner Program honors active-duty military personnel through the display of
personalized banners along Baseline Road, Milliken Avenue, Fourth Street, and Haven Avenue.
Since March 24, 2021, CR&A Custom Inc. has provided this service under a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA) with an original seven-year term and funding not to exceed $154,000.
To enhance durability and reduce weather-related damage, the City executed a phased approach
to installing spring-loaded mounting hardware into its banner system. The upgraded hardware
has significantly improved banner longevity; however, in the cases of extreme wind events in the
past year, banners not yet upgraded to spring-loaded hardware have been damaged. This has
created a need for additional banner replacements and further hardware enhancements
necessitating the increase of the contracted maximum expense amount to support the program’s
evolving operational needs.
Page 432
Page 2
2
9
9
5
ANALYSIS:
The City’s Professional Services Agreement No. 2021-079 with CR&A Custom Inc. was approved
on March 24, 2021, with a not-to-exceed amount of $154,000 over a seven-year term to support
the Armed Forces Banner Program. Amendment No. 001 proposes a revision to Section 3.1
(Compensation) of the agreement to reflect the increased not-to-exceed amount. All other terms
and conditions remain unchanged.
As of July 2025, the City has expended $133,421, leaving a remaining balance of $20,579 for the
final three years of the agreement. Based on current service levels and maintenance needs,
including banner production, installation, hardware upgrades, and periodic replacements, the
program will require approximately $25,525 annually, or $76,575 over the remaining term.
To fulfill the term of the contract, a $56,000 increase to the not-to-exceed amount is
recommended, bringing the total contract value to $210,000. This proactive adjustment will allow
the City to sustain regular operations while being prepared to respond to unforeseen damage
caused by high-wind events.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact in the 2025/2026 fiscal year, as expenses will be covered using existing
funds from the General Fund (F001), account number F001|CC401|SC2106|P0002.
For fiscal years 2026/2027 and 2027/2028, the estimated annual cost of $25,525 will be
considered during the regular budget development process.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item aligns with the City Council’s core values of building and preserving a family-oriented
atmosphere, intentionally embracing and anticipating our future, and relentless pursuit of
improvement.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Amendment No. 001
Page 433
Last Revised: 11/27/2018 Page 1 of 2
AMENDMENT NO. 001
to
Professional Services Agreement (CO # 2021-079)
between
CR&A Custom, Inc. (hereinafter “Contractor”)
and
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”)
This Amendment No. 001 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter
“Agreement”), CO# 2021-079, to incorporate the following:
Section 3.1 Compensation to read:
City shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and
complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exeed $210,000 (Two hundred ten thousand
dollars), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the
City Manager or City Council. City shallnot withold any federal, state or other taxes, or other
deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice
amount pending receipt of any deliverablee reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance
shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to
reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Contractor for any
authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO# 2021-079, will remain in full effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the
date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than
09/18/2025. The City will process both copies for signature and provide CR&A Custom, Inc. with
one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment.
CR&A Custom, Inc.
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By: _________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
By: _________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 434
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs
Jennifer Gracia, Community Services Director
Nathan Hunt, Deputy Director of Community Services
Crystal Zuniga, Community Services Superintendent
Ted Morales, Community Services Superintendent
Jonathan Hilton, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-155 Between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Clair Global Integration, LLC. for
Proactive Inspections and Maintenance of the City’s Audio-Visual
Systems, Extending the Term by One (1) Year in an Amount Not-to-
Exceed $86,970. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
1. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to Contract No.
2024-155 with Clair Global Integration, LLC dba Sound Image to exercise the first one-
year renewal option and extend services for proactive inspections and maintenance of the
City’s audio-visual (A/V) systems in a not-to-exceed amount of $86,970 for the renewal
term; and
2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to make minor, non-substantive changes and
execute any ancillary documents necessary to effectuate the amendment.
BACKGROUND:
The City has invested in state-of-the-art A/V systems at key municipal facilities including Quakes
Stadium, City Hall Council Chambers and Broadcast Suite, the Police Department’s Real Time
Information Center, the Library’s Second Story and Beyond®, the Victoria Gardens Cultural
Center, the Emergency Operations Center, and Central Park banquet rooms.
In August 2024, the City Council approved a one-year Professional Services Agreement (Contract
No. 2024-155) with Clair Global Integration, LLC dba Sound Image, with two, one-year renewal
options, to provide proactive inspections, preventative maintenance, priority response, and
related support services for these critical A/V assets. The approved contract established a first
year not-to-exceed amount of $107,690 and estimated subsequent renewal years at $86,970
annually.
Page 435
Page 2
3
0
1
4
The contract’s maintenance program has supported continuity of operations for public meetings,
emergency response readiness, and community programming by reducing downtime and
minimizing emergency service calls through scheduled preventative maintenance.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s A/V systems are mission-critical for legislative transparency, public access to meetings,
and emergency and operational readiness. Continued proactive maintenance by the original
systems integrator promotes reliability, maximizes equipment lifecycle, and sustains a high-
quality user experience across programs and venues. Covered facilities include Central Park
Banquet Rooms (David Dreier and Rancho Cucamonga Hall), City Hall Council Chambers and
Broadcast Suite, Victoria Gardens Cultural Center (Celebration Hall and Courtyard), Biane
Library’s Second Story and Beyond®, the Real Time Information Center, Quakes Stadium, and
the Emergency Operations Center. The contract also permits, upon mutual agreement, support
at other City facilities as needed.
Amendment No. 1 exercises the first renewal option under the contract terms to extend services
for one (1) additional year, services include:
Quarterly preventative maintenance visits at covered facilities;
Asset inventory and documentation (locations, serial numbers, and operational status)
maintained and updated;
Priority response for service requests and established on-site service rates;
Telephone support at no additional cost during normal business hours; and
Provision of loaner equipment and/or equipment purchases, to minimize operational
disruptions during repairs.
The renewal term under Amendment No. 1 is one (1) year. Compensation for the renewal term
shall not exceed $86,970, inclusive of all costs and out-of-pocket expenses, consistent with the
contract. All other terms of the agreement remain in effect.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact in the 2025/2026 fiscal year, as the $86,970 contract expenses are
currently allocated and assigned to the following account numbers within the 2025/2026 fiscal
year operating budget:
Department Account Number(s)Amount Budgeted
Community Services F001 CC402 SC2106 P001
F001 CC407 SC2106 P0017
$15,424.50
$12,675.00
Department of Innovation and
Technology (DoIT)F001 CC209 SC2106 $19,987.50
Library F001 CC610 SC2106 $8,775.00
Public Works F001 CC312 SC2106 $17,433.00
Fire F281 CC529 SC2106 P0127 $12,675.00
Page 436
Page 3
3
0
1
4
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item aligns with the City Council’s core values of relentless pursuit of improvement and
intentionally embracing and anticipating the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Amendment No. 1 to CO# 2024-155
Page 437
1
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Professional Services Agreement (CO # 2024-155)
between
Clair Global Integration, LLC (hereinafter the “Contractor”)
and
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”)
This Amendment No. 1 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter
“Agreement”), CO# 2024-155, to incorporate the following:
The above mentioned Agreement has been in place for one (1) year with the option to renew to a
total of three (3) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to extend the
Agreement for one (1) additional full calendar year past the currently ordained termination date.
As specified in the Agreement Section 3-Compensation for services provided during the renewal
term shall not exceed $86,970 for the one-year renewal period, inclusive of all costs and out-of-
pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City
Council as specified in the Agreement.
All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO# 2024-155 will remain in full
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have
executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below.
Clair Global Integration, LLC City of Rancho Cucamonga
By: ____________________________ By: _________________________
Name Date Name Date
____________________________ _________________________
Title Title
By: _____________________________
Name Date
_____________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 438
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Richard Favela, Streets Superintendent
Andy Miller, Facilities Superintendent
Mark Medina, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 2022-009 with Hunter
Consulting Inc., dba HCI Environmental & Engineering for Hazardous
Waste Cleanup and Removal in an Amount Not to Exceed $103,000 for
City and Fire District Services in FY 2025/2026. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council and Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District approve Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 2022-009 with Hunter Consulting Inc., dba HCI
Environmental & Engineering for hazardous waste cleanup and removal effective July 1, 2025,
for a one-year term through June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $103,000 for FY 2025/2026
BACKGROUND:
On February 16, 2022, the City Council and Fire Board of Directors accepted the bids received
for hazardous waste cleanup and removal and awarded Contract No. 2022-009 to Hunter
Consulting Inc. for the remainder of FY 2021/2022 and the full year FY 2022/2023. On October
18, 2023, the City Council and Fire Board of Directors approved the renewal of Contract No. 2022-
009 for an additional year through FY 2024/2025. Staff is now requesting the City Council and
Fire Board of Directors approve the renewal of Contract No. 2022-009 through FY 2025/2026.
The Public Works Services Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
contract hazardous waste and removal services on an as-needed basis. Some of these services
include the removal and disposal of flammable liquids, corrosives, gases, biohazards, bodily
fluids, and flammable solids within the public right-of-way. Other services include drum
remediation and disposal, confined space entry, and vacuum tank services. City and Fire District
facilities also utilize these services for clarifier and septic waste cleaning, transportation, and
disposal. Additionally, hazardous waste cleanup and removal services are contracted for traffic
collision cleanup when hazardous material is present.
ANALYSIS:
Hunter Consulting Inc. has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue
providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Fire District during FY 2025/2026
Page 439
Page 2
3
0
0
6
with a 3% increase to disposal costs only. Hunter Consulting Inc. has provided reliable service for
the City and Fire District. If approved, Amendment 3 to Contract No. 2022-009 will extend the
term of the contract to June 30, 2026, with a 3% increase to disposal costs. A copy of this
agreement is available in the City Clerk’s Office.
The chart below has been prepared to illustrate the estimated annual funding requirements for
the full contract term. This is only an estimate, and the amounts below could vary.
Fiscal Year Est. Annual
Increase (3%)
Estimated Total
Costs
FY 2022/2023 $126,000
FY 2023/2024 $168,500
FY 2024/2025 $100,000
FY 2025/2026 $3,000 $103,000
FY 2026/2027 $3,090 $106,090
FY 2027/2028 $3,183 $109,273
FY 2028/2029 $3,278 $112,551
Estimated Grand Total $825,414
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved FY 2025/2026 Budget includes sufficient funding for hazardous waste
cleanup and removal services in several contract services line items.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s core value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all by ensuring City and Fire District facilities are properly maintained.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 440
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
James Lo, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements located on 12434 4th
Street per Improvement Agreement, Related to Case No. DRC2020-
00202, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release
of Bonds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the
development of DRC2020-00202 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate
Notice of Completion; and
2. Release Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond and accept
Maintenance Bond for the associated public improvements; and
3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
DRC2020-00202 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2021 for the
construction of two (2) new industrial buildings totaling 2,175,000 square feet on certain property
located approximately 1,000 feet east of Santa Anita Avenue and 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda
Avenue, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street at 12434 4th Street. An improvement
agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on May 18, 2022 in order to ensure
construction of the required public improvements.
ANALYSIS:
All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga,
LLC, submitted the following securities to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements:
Faithful Performance Bond $259,210
Page 441
Page 2
3
0
0
4
Labor and Material Bond $259,210
City staff conducted a final inspection of the public improvements in June of 2025 and confirmed
all work was completed to City Standards.
With the completion of the improvements, the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds
are no longer required. The City will retain 10% of the Labor and Material Bond as
the Maintenance Bond to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year
warranty period (one year from final inspection). The public improvements will be re-inspected in
approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the
maintenance bond.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high-
quality improvements that promote a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 442
ATTACHMENT 1
DRC2020-00202
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Page 443
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Vishal Lad, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and
Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2024/25
Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation,
Contract No. 2025-037 (Project), as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $305,855;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of
Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $349,400, six
(6) months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release the Project
retention, 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1)
year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On April 16, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to American Asphalt South,
Inc., (American Asphalt South) in the amount of $349,400 plus 10% contingency in the amount of
$34,490 for the construction of the Project. The scope of work consisted of weed kill, routing and
crack sealing, application of slurry seal, protecting existing utilities, installation of pavement
markers and thermoplastic striping and related items of work per plans. A vicinity map illustrating
the various neighborhood streets that received slurry seal is included as Attachment 1.
A copy of the April 16, 2025, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk.
Page 444
Page 2
2
9
7
1
ANALYSIS:
The Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. One (1) contract change order was issued during
construction, resulting in a net decrease of $11,030 to the contract amount due to the contractor’s
failure to meet the wet track abrasion test requirements in certain areas. This amount will be
deducted from the withheld retention. A detailed description of the contract change order is on file
with the City’s Engineering Services Department.
The final balancing statement resulted in a net decrease of $35,550 to the final contract amount
due to a decrease from the bid quantities to the final slurry seal area quantity. The balancing
statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed
during the contract.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by
the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $448,375 was budgeted in FY 2024/25 from the Measure I Fund (177), which is identified
under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amount listed below.
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
F177 CC303 SC7004;
PID2195-177
Measure I Fund (177)Local Street Rehab $448,375
Total Project Funding $448,375
The final project cost is $348,610 as shown below:
Expenditure Amount
Final Construction Contract $305,855
Construction Inspection Services $25,635
Construction Materials Testing $15,495
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,625
Total Project Cost $348,610
A total of $99,765 is remaining in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Measure I
Fund (177) balance to be used for future capital improvement projects.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 445
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2025-02
FY 2024/25 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
He
r
m
o
s
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
Page 446
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Shane Adams, Fire Marshal
Darci Vogel. Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Waiving the Collection of Certain
Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
(RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-023) (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board adopt a resolution waiving the collection of certain currently
approved inspection, permit, and special services fees for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
BACKGROUND:
Resolution FD 13-032 requires the Fire District to complete an annual analysis of the approved
fees and charges to determine if there is a current need to collect the fees and charges, in whole
or in part, to meet the fiscal needs of the Fire District. This analysis is completed as part of the
annual budget process. Upon completion of this analysis and presentation of findings to the Board
as part of the budget request, the Board is required to direct staff, by means of a resolution,
regarding the collection of fees for the current fiscal year.
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Resolution FD 13-032, staff conducted a review of currently approved fees and
charges in conjunction with the preparation of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 budget. Staff
determined that the existing financial condition of the Fire District is such that there does not exist
a fiscal need to collect certain inspection, permit, and special services fees and charges. As such,
the Fire District’s budget for FY 2025-26 was prepared without including certain inspection, permit,
and special services fees and charges as projected revenue. The budget has since been
approved without this projected revenue.
Since the budget does not anticipate the collection of certain fees and charges, a resolution of
the Board is required that will approve waiving the collection of these fees and charges and direct
staff to not assess the fees and charges for FY 2025-26. Consistent with the previous fiscal years,
the fees that will not be collected this fiscal year are the fees currently approved for:
Recurring inspections of facilities such as apartment buildings, hospitals, and medical care
businesses. These are buildings and businesses that are regularly inspected, either by
State mandate or by way of being identified as high hazard facilities, which do not require
a Fire Code Operating Permit. Inspections will continue but fees will not be assessed.
Fire Code Operating Permits for certain hazardous and high risk business operations that
Page 447
Page 2
2
9
4
9
the Fire Code requires to be permitted by the local fire department. The permitting process
anticipates that the business and its associated operations will be inspected on a regular basis to
ensure compliance with all safety requirements for the particular operation or occupancy as
conditioned by the permit. Inspections will continue and required permits will be issued. However,
the associated permit fees will not be assessed.
Certain special services when the service can be provided during normal working hours.
These services include safety inspections of roofing operations, the use of tents,
residential care facilities, home day care facilities, and similar operations and facility uses
throughout the Fire District’s service area that require or benefit from safety oversight. The
inspections will continue but the approved fees will not be assessed.
The entire schedule of fees that will not be collected this fiscal year is included in Exhibit A, Exhibit
B, and Exhibit C of the resolution.
Fees that will continue to be collected include:
Special services fees for events that take place outside of normal working hours such as
fireworks shows, events sponsored by community organizations or businesses, and
generally any one-time event for which safety oversight is needed and which, due to the
day and time of the required inspection, will require the Fire District to pay overtime wages
for the inspection service.
Special services fees such as fees for Community Facilities District (CFD) annexations
and fees for false or unwanted alarms. The annexation fees cover the cost of processing
annexations into the CFD and the false alarm fees are both a cost recovery means and a
deterrent mechanism.
Fees for Fire District supplied signs and equipment such as the cost recovery fees for Fire
District supplied padlocks that secure and provide firefighter access to gates throughout
the Fire District and the Fire District created signs that let firefighters know where access
is obstructed, where ladder points for roof access are located, and where roof top
photovoltaic systems have been installed.
Rental fees for usage of the rooms, props, and equipment at Fire District facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The last full fiscal year for which approved fees and charges were assessed was FY 2012-13. At
that time, the fees and charges generated approximately $750,000 in revenue for the Fire District.
Waiving the collection of the fees and charges shown in the exhibits to the proposed resolution
will allow these funds to remain with Rancho Cucamonga businesses, which is anticipated to help
fund jobs, investment, and additional research and development.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Waiving the collection of certain inspection, permit, and special services fees is anticipated to
increase the sustainability and financial viability of businesses and foster equality among
businesses regardless of their size.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. FD 2025-023, FY 25-26 Fee Waiver
Page 448
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 1 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN INSPECTION,
PERMIT, AND SPECIAL SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, Resolution No. FD 13-032 requires the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
(Fire District) to complete an annual analysis of the approved fees to determine if there is a current need
to collect the fees, in whole or in part, to meet the fiscal needs of the Fire District; and
WHEREAS, Fire District staff completed this analysis in conjunction with preparing the fiscal year
2025-26 budgets; and
WHEREAS, Fire District staff determined that there does not exist a fiscal need to collect certain
fees previously approved by the Board; and
WHEREAS, the Fire District budgets for fiscal year 2025-26 have been approved; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES,
1) To waive the collection of the Inspection and Permit fees identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
2) To waive the collection of the Special Services fees identified in Exhibit C when those Special
Services can be provided during normal work hours.
3) That all other approved fees will be assessed and collected.
4) That nothing in this Resolution shall be deemed to affect any other fees of the Fire District
currently in effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025.
Page 449
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 2 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-023
EXHIBIT A
Fire Inspection Fees:
Fire Inspection Fees (Master Fee Schedule, Section 1.4.1)Fee
Adult / Child Care Facility (Group I-4 occupancies)Per inspection $363
Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour)Per inspection $122
Apartment Building / Complex Annual Inspection
• Buildings with 3 or 4 units Per inspection $182
• Buildings with 5 to 7 units Per inspection $242
• Buildings with 8 units Per inspection $363
• Each additional dwelling unit (per unit)Per inspection $13
Condominium Complex Annual Inspection Per inspection $363
High Rise Building annual inspection (per hour)Per inspection $122
Hotel / Motel Annual Inspection
• First 10 rooms Per inspection $363
• Each additional dwelling unit (per unit)Per inspection $13
Large Family Day Care annual inspection Per inspection $122
Licensed Care Facility
• Pre-inspection - 25 or fewer residents Per inspection $56
• Pre-inspection - more than 25 residents Per inspection $110
• Annual Inspection
- Home Car Facility (more than six)Per inspection $242
- Commercial facility - first 10 rooms Per inspection $363
- Commercial facility - each additional room Per inspection $13
Medical Facility
• Hospital / Nursing Home (Group I-2.1)Per inspection $724
• Clinic Per inspection $242
• Ambulatory Care Facility (Group I-2.1)Per inspection $363
Private School / Large Child Care Facility (Group E occupancy)
• Small School - Less than 50 children Per inspection $242
• Large School - 50 or more children Per inspection $363
Requested Inspection or Standby During Regular Work Hours Per hour $122
Page 450
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 3 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX
EXHIBIT B
Fire Operational Permit Fees:
Fire Operational Permit Fees (Master Fee Schedule, Section 1.4.3)Fee
Additive Manufacturing Per permit $242
Access Control
• Commercial Per permit $182
• Residential (requires monthly testing)Per permit $604
Artificial Combustible Vegetation Per permit $242
Aerosol Products Per permit $604
Ambulatory Health Care Facility Per permit $242
Amusement Area Per permit $302
Aviation Facility
• Fuel Servicing Vehicles Per permit $242
• Servicing or Repair Per permit $604
Battery Charging Per permit $242
Carbon Dioxide Systems Used in Beverage Dispensing Per permit $122
Cellulose Nitrate Film Per permit $363
Combustible Dust Producing Operations
• 5,000 square feet or less Per permit $302
• 5,001 to 15,000 square feet Per permit $604
• More than 15,000 square feet Per permit $784
Combustible Fibers Per permit $302
Commercial Cooking Per permit $242
Commercial Cooking Oil Storage Per permit $122
Commercial Kitchen Exhaust Inspection and Cleaning Per permit $122
Compressed Gases
• Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Highly toxic - any amount Per permit $363
• Inert/Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cu ft Per permit $363
• Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Medical Use Gases - Less than RCFD Standard 1-1
- Portable cylinders Per permit $182
- Piped system Per permit $242
• Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Oxidizing / oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Pyrophoric - any amount Per permit $363
• Radioactive - any amount Per permit $363
• Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet Per permit $363
• Toxic - any amount Per permit $363
• Unstable reactive - any amount Per permit $363
Covered Mall Building Per permit $722
Cryogenic Fluids Per permit $363
Page 451
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 4 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
Cutting and Welding Per permit $302
Delayed Egress Per permit $182
Dipping Operations Per permit $363
Distilled Spirits and Wines Per permit $363
Dry Cleaning
• Small plant - 1 or 2 machines Per permit $242
• Medium plant - 3 or 4 machines Per permit $363
• Large plant - 5 or more machines Per permit $784
Electrical Energy Storage System Per permit $363
Electrically Locked Egress Per permit $182
Emergency Power System Per permit $242
Explosives
• Process, manufacture, store, or sell Per permit $378
• Use Per permit $264
Fire Alarm Services Per permit $122
Fire Hydrants and Valves Per permit $182
Flammable and Combustible Liquids
• Class I liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. outside
of a building Per permit $182
• Class II or Class IIIA in excess of 25 gal. in a building; 60 gal.
outside of building
Per permit $182
• 250 gallons or less over max allowable quantity Per permit $604
• 251-500 gallons over max allowable quantity Per permit $634
• 501-1,000 gallons over max allowable quantity Per permit $663
• 1,001-5,000 gallons over max allowable quantity Per permit $695
• 5,001-10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity Per permit $724
• More than 10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity Per permit $754
• Remove Class I or Class II from a UST Per permit $1,027
• Operate tank vehicles, etc.Per permit $363
• Place a tank out of service Per permit $1,027
• Change contents Per permit $604
• Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine Per permit $1,236
• Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't site Per permit $363
• Dispense - Tank vehicle to fuel tank Per permit $363
• Use or Operate a pipeline within a facility Per permit $363
Flaming Foods or Beverages Per permit $122
Floor Finishing in excess of 350 sq ft with Class I or II liquids
• Commercial / Industrial Per permit $264
• Residential Per permit $150
Fruit and Crop Ripening Per permit $604
Fuel-Fired Appliance Per permit $122
Gas Detection System Per permit $122
Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in RCFD
Standard 1-1
• Gallons - 250 or fewer Per permit $604
• Gallons - 251-500 Per permit $634
• Gallons - 501-1,000 Per permit $663
• Gallons - 1,001-5,000 Per permit $695
Page 452
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 5 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
• Gallons - 5,001-10,000 Per permit $724
• Gallons - More than 10,000 Per permit $754
• Pounds - 1,000 or fewer Per permit $604
• Pounds - 1,001-5,000 Per permit $634
• Pounds - 5,001-10,000 Per permit $663
• Pounds - 10,001-25,000 Per permit $695
• Pounds - 25,001-50,000 Per permit $724
• Pounds - More than 50,000 Per permit $754
• Cubic feet - 500 or fewer Per permit $604
• Cubic feet - 501-2,000 Per permit $634
• Cubic feet - 2,001-5,000 Per permit $663
• Cubic feet - 5,001-10,000 Per permit $695
• Cubic feet - 10,001-25,000 Per permit $724
• Cubic feet - More than 25,000 Per permit $754
HPM Facilities Per permit $483
High Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 500 square feet
• 500-75,000 square feet Per permit $604
• 75,001-500,000 square feet Per permit $663
• More than 500,000 square feet Per permit $724
Hot Work
• Fixed Site Per permit $302
• Operations Per permit $242
• Program Per permit $182
Hyperbaric Facility Per permit $242
Industrial Facility / Shop
• 2,500 square feet or less Per permit $264
• 2,501-5,000 square feet Per permit $363
• 5,001-15,000 square feet Per permit $604
• 15,001-50,000 square feet Per permit $815
• More than 50,000 square feet Per permit Actual permit
fees
Industrial Ovens Per permit $363
Liquid- or Gas-Fueled vehicles or equipment in Assembly area
or
occupancy
Per permit $182
Lithium Batteries Per permit $363
LP-gas
• Store, Use, Handle, Dispense, Sell Per permit $242
• Industrial Trucks and Equipment Only (4 cylinder
maximum)
Per permit $182
• Cylinder Exchange only Per permit $122
Lumber Yard and/or Wood Working Plant Per permit $483
Magnesium Per permit $363
Miscellaneous Combustible Storage Per permit $242
Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles Per permit $182
Mobile Motor Fuel Dispensing Per permit $182
Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility $0
• Commercial Per permit $363
Page 453
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 6 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
• Residential Per permit $122
Open Flames in Group E Occupancies Per permit $122
Organic Coatings Per permit $363
Pallet Storage Per permit $302
Place of Assembly
• A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums Per permit $483
• A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns,
Bars
Per permit $363
• A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement Per permit $363
• A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar - fixed seats Per permit $483
• A-5 Outdoor assembly area and/or use Per permit $724
Plant Extraction System Per permit $242
Powder Coating Per permit $363
Private Fire Hydrant Per permit $182
Production Facility Per permit $422
Pyroxylin Plastics Per permit $483
Recycling Facility Per permit $604
Refrigeration Equipment Per permit $302
Reinforced Plastics / Resin Application Per permit $363
Repair Garage
• 2,500 square feet or less Per permit $264
• 2,501-5,000 square feet Per permit $363
• 5,001-15,000 square feet Per permit $604
• 15,001-50,000 square feet Per permit $815
• More than 50,000 square feet Per permit Actual permit
fees
Rooftop Heliport Per permit $242
Solar Photovoltaic Power System Per permit $483
Spraying Operations Per permit $363
Standby Power System Per permit $242
Stationary Storage Battery System Per permit $363
Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts Per permit $242
Tire Rebuilding Plant Per permit $1,236
Vehicle Mounted Fire Extinguishers Per permit $182
Waste Handling Facility Per permit $604
Wood Products Per permit $483
Page 454
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 7 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX
EXHIBIT C
Special Inspection Fees:
Special Inspection Fees (Master Fee Schedule, Section 1.4.4)Fee
Amusement Building Per inspection $302
Asphalt Kettle Hot Work
• Non-pumping and less than 150 gallons Per inspection $122
• Pumping or more than 150 gallons Per inspection $242
Bonfire Per inspection $122
Carnivals, Fairs, and Outdoor Public Assemblages Per inspection $242
Commercial cooking operation at carnival, fair, and outdoor
event
Per inspection $150
Exhibits and Trade Shows Per inspection $242
Explosives / Blasting Agents (single use permit)Per inspection $242
Fire Extinguisher Training
• During normal work hours Per inspection $122
• After normal work hours Per inspection $182
Fireworks
• Small Display, 1 to 4 minutes Per inspection $242
• Medium Display, 5 to 8 minutes Per inspection $604
• Large Display, 9 or more minutes Per inspection $815
Hazardous Materials Tank - Remove/Abandon in Place Per inspection $784
Hot work single day operation Per inspection $122
LP-gas install stationary container Per inspection $182
Liquid or gas fueled vehicles in assembly area Per inspection $182
Live Audience Per inspection $242
Model Rockets Per inspection $122
Open Burning Per inspection $122
Open Flames Devices Per inspection $122
Open Flames for Theatrical Performances Per inspection $122
Parade - inspection of floats Per inspection $122
Place of Assembly Per inspection $242
Portable Generator Per inspection $122
Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material
• Limited effects, 1 to 4 minutes Per inspection $242
Page 455
Resolution No. FD 2025-023
Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
6
1
1
6
• Moderate effects, 5 to 8 minutes Per inspection $604
• Extensive effects, 9 or more minutes Per inspection $815
Recreational Fire Per inspection $122
Seasonal Sales Lot Per inspection $150
Tent or Temporary Membrane Structure Per inspection $242
Torch Applied Roof Hot Work
• Patch / Repair (500 sq ft or less)Per inspection $122
• Roof Replacement (more than 500 sq ft)Per inspection $182
Page 456
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst
SUBJECT:Consideration of Approval to Rescind Resolution No. FD 2025-022;
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to
as Annexation No. 88-25-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1;
and Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation.
(RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-024) (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District:
1. Rescind Resolution No. FD 2025-022 declaring intention to annex territory referred to as
“Annexation No. 88-25-1” into Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and setting a public
hearing for September 17, 2025;
2. Adopt a new Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as “Annexation No. 88-
25-1” into Community Facilities District No. 88-1 to specify the services to be financed, to
set and specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be
levied within the territory proposed to be annexed; and
3. Set a time and place for a public hearing regarding Annexation No. 88-25-1.
BACKGROUND:
The property owner of APN 0225-191-32 (13341 Banyan Street), located within the Fire
Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District to annex
“Annexation No. 88-25-1” into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 to satisfy
fire protection service mitigation impacts.
Annexation proceedings were previously initiated with a public hearing set for September 17,
2025, however the public hearing has been rescheduled. As a result, Resolution No. FD 2025-
022 declaring intention to annex territory referred to as “Annexation No. 88-25-1” will be rescinded
and the initial annexation proceedings will be repeated in order to set the new public hearing date.
ANALYSIS:
In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a
Resolution of Intention to Authorize the Annexation of Annexation No. 88-25-1.
Page 457
Page 2
3
0
2
7
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 declares the Fire Board intention to authorize the annexation of
territory “Annexation No. 88-25-1” to CFD No. 88-1 (Attachment 1). The Resolution of Intention
generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District shown in Exhibit
“A”; (b) a description of the services and facilities which will, in part, be financed through the levy
of the special tax on the Territory if annexed shown in Exhibit “B”; (c) the rate and method of
apportionment of the proposed special tax shown in Exhibit “C”; (d) the date, time and location of
the public hearing set for October 15, 2025, (e) election requirements.
Special Counsel for the District has worked with staff to establish the annexation process,
timelines and draft resolutions. The resolutions are considered to be routine and non-
controversial, as the property owners are in support of the annexation procedure. On October 15,
2025, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The special tax revenues that are collected from CFD No. 88-1 are used to pay for public facilities
and services in the District area. Costs related to the administering of the District are the
responsibility of the property owners within the District. Annexation of the property ensures the
property owner covers the cost of increased demand for fire services resulting from new
development within the Territory.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Annexation of the property into CFD
88-1 ensures the delivery of vital fire and life safety services to all residents while satisfying fire
protection service mitigation impacts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. FD 2025-024, Intention to Authorize Annexation No. 88-25-1
Attachment 2 – Notice of Public Hearing for Fire Secretary for Annexation No. 88-25-1
Page 458
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 1 of 11
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO.
88-25-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
WHEREAS, the Board Of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California,
(“Board of Directors”), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
“Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the
Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”). The Community Facilities District has been
designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of
certain real property to the District (the “Territory”); and
WHEREAS, a map entitled “Annexation Map No. 88-25-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88-
1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California” (the
“Annexation Map”) showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, the
map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of
these proceedings; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt the Resolution of Intention to
annex the Territory to the District, to describe the territory included within the District and the Territory
proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the facilities and services to be financed from the proceeds of
the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied
within the Territory to finance such facilities and services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing
relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District.
WHEREAS, the public hearing date was originally scheduled for September 17, 2025, and has
been rescheduled;
WHEREAS, Resolution FD2025-022 declaring intention to authorize the annexation of territory
“Annexation No. 88-25-1” to CFD No. 88-1 and setting a public hearing date of September 17, 2025, is
hereby rescinded.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
does hereby resolve as follows:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.
2. Legal Authority. These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors
pursuant to the authorization of the Act.
3. Intention to Annex; Description of the Territory and the District. The Board of Directors
hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the
District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District.
A description of the Territory is as follows:
All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is
Page 459
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 2 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is on
file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection.
A general description of the Territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows:
All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently
annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on original maps of the District and the territories
subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the
name of the District, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit “A” (the “Annexation
Map”). Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the
Office of the County Recorder.
4. Services and Facilities Authorized to be Financed by the District. The services that are
authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing
District are generally described in Exhibit “B” (the “Services and Facilities”) attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference and all costs associated the District, administration of the District,
the determination of the amount of special taxes to be levied, the costs of collection any special taxes,
and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District. If and to the
extent feasible the Services and Facilities shall be provided in common within the existing District and the
Territory.
5. Special Taxes. It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where
funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and Facilities and related
incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-
exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For
further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is
made to Exhibit “C” (the “Special Tax Formula”), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference and which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to
allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount
that such person will have to pay.
The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied
to pay for the Services and Facilities in the existing District, except that a higher or lower special tax may
be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services and Facilities in
the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services and Facilities in the existing
District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than
the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the special tax formula.
The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem
property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of
delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by
resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes
that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District.
Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall
attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until
the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with
law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases.
The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as
a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District.
Page 460
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 3 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
6. Public Hearing. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025, AT
THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS BOARD OF
DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL
TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARING ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS,
MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR
OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES
WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED.
ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITING. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS
PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN
WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH
OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR
TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT
ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
7. Majority Protest. If a written majority protest against the proposed annexation of the
Territory to the District is filed, and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less
than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the
decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing.
8. Election. If following the public hearing described in the Section above, the Board of
Directors determines to proceed with the annexation of the Territory to the District, a proposition shall be
submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the
Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each
landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory.
9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk
by causing the publication of a Notice of Public Hearing in a legally designated newspaper of general
circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to
be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing.
A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
required by the Act.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2025.
Page 461
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 4 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
EXHIBIT “A”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
ANNEXATION MAP
Page 462
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 5 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
BOUNDARY MAP
Page 463
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 6 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
EXHIBIT “B”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES
The Services.
It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services (the “Services”) that are
in addition to those currently provided in or required for the Territory and are necessary to meet the
increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not
be replacing services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be
financed is as follows:
The performance of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to
provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory.
The Facilities.
It is the intention of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion,
improvement, or rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities (the “Facilities”) that are in addition to those
currently provided to serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire
services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already
available to serve the Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as
follows:
Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with a useful
life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for
anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent
that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities
resulting from new development within the Territory.
Page 464
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 7 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
EXHIBIT “C”
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax authorized to be levied within Community
Facilities District No. 88-1 (the “CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method”) as originally established for and as
applied to the taxable properties within such community facilities district is as follows:
“The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of
apportionment of the Special Tax so as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed
Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be required for
payment for such landowner’s or resident’s property.
PROPERTY CATEGORIES
There are three categories of property subject to special taxation, which are identified as follows:
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessor’s parcel for which
property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any
year.
2. APPROVED PROPERTY All property which of as May 31 of any year is subject to an
approved Development Agreement with either the City of Rancho
Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino, an approved
Annexation Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or a
recorded Final Subdivision Map or Final Parcel Map, but for which
no building permit has been issued.
3. VACANT PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the
election to authorize the levy of the Special Tax, is: (i) owned by
public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being
utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as
open space.
Page 465
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 8 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the maximum authorized Special Tax
rates for fiscal year 1988-1989 are as follows:
TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class I
(More than 3,590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$292 per year
B. Residential Class II
(3,077 – 3,589 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$225 per year
C. Residential Class III
(2,564 – 3,076 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$180 per year
D. Residential Class IV
(2,308 – 2,563 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$157 per year
E. Residential Class V
(2,051 – 2,307 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$135 per year
F. Residential Class VI
(1,795 – 2,050 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$124 per year
G. Residential Class VII
(less – 1,795 square feet of
dwelling unit living area) *
$112 per year
H. Commercial or Industrial Property
$449 per acre per year or $0.04
per SF or building area,
whichever is greater **
2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel
3. VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre ***
Page 466
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 9 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
* The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space,
exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s)
issued for the dwelling unit.
** The square footage of a commercial or industrial building area shall mean the gross square
footage for the building as reflected in the building plans upon which any building permits for the
building were issued.
*** The acreage of a Vacant Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated
or offered for dedication to a public agency.
ESCALATION OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
The maximum annual Special Tax rates applicable to all Developed Property shall be subject to
escalation each July 1 commencing July 1, 1989, by the change factor calculated annually by the State
of California Department of Finance for the purpose of increasing appropriations limits of State and local
governments. In the event that the Department of Finance or its successor ceases to calculate the
annual change factor, such Special Tax rates shall be subject to annual escalation not to exceed the
increase in the Consumer Price Index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles
Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area for the preceding twelve (12) month reporting period.
The maximum Special Tax rates applicable to all Approved Property and Vacant Property shall not be
subject to escalation.
METHOD OF APPROTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified
Property Categories so long as Special Tax revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the
Community Facilities District, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any
bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for
any such future public improvements, services or debt service; direct payment for public improvements;
or payment of the operational and maintenance expenses of providing fire suppression and protection
services to properties within the Community Facilities District.
The annual levy of the Special Taxes shall be apportioned as follows:
STEP 1: Fifty percent (50%) of the estimated ad valorem property tax revenue to be collected from
properties within the Community Facilities District in the subject fiscal year which are allocable
to the Foothill Fire Protection District shall be allocated to pay the estimated expenses of the
Community Facilities District for the subject fiscal year. The remainder of the estimated
expenses shall be referred to as the Net CFD Expenses.
STEP 2: That equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all
Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax revenues
equal to the Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on all Developed Property.
STEP 3: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that
percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Approved Property
necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall
be levied on Approved Property.
Page 467
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 10 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
STEP 4: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that
percentage of all the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Vacant Property
necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall
be levied on all Vacant Property.
STEP 5: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, the
Community Facilities District shall:
A. Compare (i) the Special Tax rate which would be levied on each Developed Property
pursuant to STEP 2 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square
footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax. The Base
Maximum Special Tax means an amount equal to $0.0025 per square foot subject to
escalation at the same rate and at the same time applicable to the maximum Special
Tax rates for Developer Property.
B. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax rate described in (i) above
for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special
Tax rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate
not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional
Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the minimum Special Tax which shall be levied on all taxable properties
within the Community Facilities District each Fiscal Year shall be:
DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $1.00 per dwelling unit for residential uses
$1.00 per acre for commercial/industrial uses
APPROVED PROPERTY: $1.00 per lot or parcel
VACANT PROPERTY: $1.00 per acre
The ad valorem property tax contribution identified in Step 1 shall be reduced in any Fiscal Year by the
amount by which the sum of such contribution and the minimum Special Taxes would exceed the
estimated expenses of the Community Facilities District for such Fiscal Year
* * *
The “Report” of the Special Tax Consultant, to be approved as a part of the record upon the conclusion
of the public hearing pertaining to the formation of the Community Facilities District, shall set forth
supplementary details pertaining to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax and shall
provide controlling guidance in the interpretation and implementation of this Rate and Method of
Apportionment.”
Page 468
Resolution No. FD 2025-024 - Page 11 of 11
6
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
* * *
Application of the CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method to Annexation No. 88-25-1
The maximum special tax authorized to be levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26 within that area
annexed to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, known and designated as Annexation No. 88-25-1 is
as follows:
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class I
(More than 3,590 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
B. Residential Class II
(3,077 - 3,589 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
C. Residential Class III
(2,564 - 3,076 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
D. Residential Class IV
(2,308 - 2,563 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
E. Residential Class V
(2,051 - 2,307 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
F. Residential Class VI
(1,795 - 2,050 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
G. Residential Class VII
(less - 1,795 square feet of
dwelling unit living area)
$3,020.97 per acre per year or
$0.24421 per square foot or
building, whichever is greater
2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel
3. VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre
$751.37 per year
H. Commercial or Industrial Property
$1,962.78 per year
$1,505.04 per year
$1,201.04 per year
$1,052.70 per year
$900.85 per year
$832.06 per year
The maximum special tax rates set forth above are subject to escalation pursuant to the CFD No. 88-1
Rate and Method commencing July 1, 1989.
Page 469
6
1
3
4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING
ANNEXATION TO EXISTING
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
ANNEXATION NO. 88-25-1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board Of Directors (the "Legislative Body") of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Fire Protection District") is desirous to annex territory to
an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982, the existing Community Facilities District having been
designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1, and the territory proposed to be annexed
to be designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-25-1 (the
"Annexation Area").
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION AREA
The Annexation Area shall consist of all of that area of land which is included within the
boundaries as shown on a map designated as Annexation No. 88-25-1 for the above referenced
Community Facilities District.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES
The proposed services to be provided to serve the Annexation Area are generally described as
follows:
The performance of functions, operations and maintenance and repair
activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services.
Such services shall be shared between the existing Community Facilities District and the
Annexation Area.
A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed by the Annexation is as follows:
Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with
a useful life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of
funds to pay for anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and
replacement to the extent that such facilities are necessary to meet the
increased demand for such facilities resulting from new development within the
Territory.
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE
15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025, AT THE HOUR OF 7 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR
MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730. AT SUCH TIME THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL HEAR
ALL EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY BY ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, PROPERTY OWNERS,
VOTERS AND TAXPAYERS, RELATING GENERALLY TO THE FOLLOWING:
Page 470
6
1
3
4
A. Authorization to annex the Annexation Area to the existing Community Facilities District;
B. Authorization to levy special taxes in the Annexation Area.
ALL PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND REGISTERED
VOTERS, MAY APPEAR AND PRESENT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY RELATING TO THE
ANNEXATION OF ANNEXATION AREA TO THE EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT. ANY PROTEST PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO
ANNEX THE ANNEXATION AREA TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MUST BE IN
WRITING, AND SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AT THE ADDRESS SET FORTH ABOVE ON OR BEFORE
THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING. IF A MAJORITY PROTEST IS TIMELY FILED AGAINST
THE ANNEXATION OF THE ANNEXATION AREA, THE LEGISLATIVE BODY SHALL
ABANDON THE PROCEEDINGS OR MODIFY THE PROCEEDINGS. IF SAID MAJORITY
PROTEST IS LIMITED TO CERTAIN SERVICES OR SPECIAL TAX, THOSE SERVICES OR
THAT TAX SHALL BE ELIMINATED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY.
SPECIAL TAX
The services and facilities shall be financed through the levy of special taxes on all property
within the existing Community Facilities District, as well as the Annexation Area. A copy of the
rate and method of apportionment of the special tax is on file in the Office of the Fire Chief and
is available for inspection during normal office hours.
ELECTION
Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board will conduct a special election on
October 15, 2025, where the annexation proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors,
being the property owners, with each owner having one (1) vote per acre or portion thereof of
land owned within the proposed annexed territory.
INQUIRIES
For any questions relating to the proceedings or any particulars, please contact the following
designated person:
MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
For further particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory to an
Existing Community Facilities District and the original Report of the Tax Consultant, as said
documents have been approved and are on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open
for public inspection.
Publish:
Kim Sevy, Secretary
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
Acting on behalf of Community Facilities
District No. 88-1
Page 471
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
ORDINANCE NO. 1045
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.36.09 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADDING CHAPTER 17.84 TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING
UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITIES, AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION FROM CEQA
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1045.
BACKGROUND:
The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was conducted at the Regular
City Council Meeting August 20, 2025. Votes at first reading: AYES: Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott,
Stickler, Michael.
ANALYSIS:
Please refer to the August 20, 2025, City Council Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Please refer to the August 20, 2025, City Council Staff Report.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
Please refer to the August 20, 2025, City Council Staff Report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Undergrounding Ordinance No. 1045
Page 472
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 1 of 5
ORDINANCE NO. 1045
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 16.36.09
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND
ADDING CHAPTER 17.84 TO THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING
UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITIES, AND
MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION FROM
CEQA
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Adoption of Chapter 17.84. Chapter 17.84 (“Underground Utilities”) of
Article IV (“Site Development Provisions”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby added to read in full as follows:
“17.84 Underground Utilities.
17.84.010. Undergrounding Utilities. Except as provided in Section 17.84.060 or
where payment of an in-lieu fee is authorized, all new and existing overhead utility
lines shall be installed underground in conjunction with any development, including
the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of the
development as provided in this Chapter, at the applicant’s expense.
A. Arrangements, including the payment of all costs for
undergrounding, shall be made by the applicant with the serving
utilities.
B. Undergrounding shall be completed:
1. Prior to the acceptance of related street improvements; or
2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy if no related
street improvements are required.
17.84.020. In-Lieu Fee. In those circumstances where the City Engineer decides
that undergrounding is impractical, the applicant may satisfy the undergrounding
requirement by paying an in-lieu fee in accordance with the formula set forth in
Section 17.84.050. The in-lieu fee shall be paid to the city prior to the approval of
the final subdivision map, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The City
Engineer may determine undergrounding is impractical if any of the following
conditions exist:
A. The length of the lines to be places underground will be less than
three hundred (300) feet and the utility lines have not been placed
underground on any property abutting the subject property;
Page 473
Page 2 of 6
6
1
0
3
B. Severe disruption to existing off-site improvements or heavy
congestion of utility lines would make impractical service to
properties under separate ownership; or
C. Any other condition that City Engineer finds exists and will make
undergrounding impractical.
17.84.030. Poles Containing 66KV or Larger Electrical Lines. 66KV or larger
electrical lines shall not be undergrounded unless the City Engineer and applicant
agree to do so.
17.84.040. Limits of Responsibility. Undergrounding shall include the
development’s entire frontage and extend to: (i) the first existing pole off-site from
the development’s boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (ii) a new
pole erected at a development’s boundary (across the street for corner properties),
or (iii) an existing pole within five feet of a development’s boundary, except a
corner.
17.84.050. Fee Amount. The in-lieu fee amount shall be equal to the amount
identified in a detailed project specific construction cost estimate approved by the
City Engineer and prepared by a qualified engineer registered in the State of
California. The cost for preparation of the required construction cost estimate shall
be borne by the applicant.
17.84.060. Exemptions.
A. The following developments shall be exempt from undergrounding
utility lines as required by this Chapter:
1. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments,
such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water
tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosures of outdoor
storage area, parking and loading area, block walls and fences,
etc.
2. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25%
of the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor’s
parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less.
3. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as:
reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment
screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc.
4. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPs.
5. Projects consisting of the construction of one (1) single family
residence on an existing parcel.
Page 474
Page 3 of 6
6
1
0
3
6. Existing overhead utility lines located in public and private rights-
of way, including but not limited to streets, trails, alleys, and utility
easements where heavy congestion of utility lines would make
impractical service to properties under separate ownership.
7. Residential subdivisions of ten or fewer single family residential
parcels, where utility lines extend at least 600 feet offsite from
both project boundaries.
8. Where otherwise preempted by state law.
B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is no exemption to the
requirement to underground overhead utilities under this Chapter for
projects within the boundaries of:
1. (i) General Plan Focus Area 1: Downtown Rancho Cucamonga
(Victoria Gardens & Epicenter); (ii) General Plan Focus Area 2:
Civic Center; (iii) General Plan Focus Area 3: HART District; and
(iv) General Plan Focus Area 8: Southeast Industrial Area, as all
such focus areas are defined by the general plan and shown in a
resolution approved by the City Council.
2. Any specific plan or master plan adopted by the City Council.
17.84.070. In-Lieu Fee Expenditure.
A. Funds collected from in-lieu fees shall be spent in the region in which
the development from which the funds were collected is located. For
purposes of this Chapter, the regions shall be identified in a map that
is approved by the Council in a resolution and the official copy shall
be on file in the Engineering Division.
B. Once the City has collected sufficient funds from in-lieu fees within a
region to underground a section of utility lines, the City may
underground a section of utility lines within that region.
17.84.080. Appeals.
A. An applicant adversely affected by the City Engineer’s determination
that undergrounding is or is not impractical pursuant to Section
17.84.020 or contesting the amount of the in-lieu fee may appeal
such determinations to the City Council.
B. All appeals shall be in writing and shall state the reason why utility
undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical or the in-lieu fee was
unreasonable or erroneously calculated. Appeals in instances finding
undergrounding is not impractical shall include a preliminary
estimate of cost, in writing, from the serving utilities.
Page 475
Page 4 of 6
6
1
0
3
C. An applicant may initiate an appeal by filing a notice of appeal with
the City Clerk within 20 days after the date on which the City
Engineer takes the action appealed from and paying the applicable
fee, which shall be set by resolution.
D. The City Council shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such
appeal. The City Clerk shall give notice to the appellant of the time
and place of hearing by serving the notice personally or by depositing
it in the United States Post Office in the city, postage prepaid,
addressed to such persons at their last known addresses.
E. The City Council shall have the authority to determine all questions
raised on such appeal.
F. City Council determinations are final.”
Section 2. Amendment of Chapter 16.39.090. Chapter 16.36.090 (“Required
Improvements; Utilities”) of Title 16 (“Subdivisions”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as set forth below.
“16.36.090 Required improvements; utilities.
All new and existing overhead utility lines are subject to and shall comply with the
requirements of Chapter 17.84 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.”
Section 3.The development code amendment set forth in Section 1 above generally
requiring the undergrounding of new utility facilities in new development, with certain
exceptions, is consistent with the general plan, including for example, Goal S-5.6 which
provides: “Underground Utilities. Promote under-grounding of utilities for new
development, major remodels, and redevelopment.”
Section 4.Repeal of Planning Commission Resolution 87-96. Upon the date that this
Ordinance takes effect, Planning Commission Resolution 87-96 and related policies of
the City’s Engineering Division with conflicting processes for undergrounding utility lines
in developments are hereby repealed.
Section 5.Projects deemed complete or entitled as of the effective date of this
Ordinance that have not implemented their undergrounding requirements specified in
applicable entitlement conditions of approval may request review of such conditions by
the Engineering Director and Planning Director for a determination of whether any
changes in applicable Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code or other applicable
regulations pertaining to utility undergrounding would either (i) eliminate the
undergrounding requirements or (ii) allow for compliance with undergrounding
requirements through payment of an in-lieu fee. Notwithstanding Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Section 17.14.100, the Directors are jointly authorized to amend or waive
Page 476
Page 5 of 6
6
1
0
3
the applicable condition of approval if they find that either condition (i) or (ii) described
above applies.
Section 6.CEQA. The City Council finds that pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15378(a), the proposed
Ordinance is not considered a “Project” under CEQA because it does not have the
potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a
reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This is due to the
fact that the Ordinance does not change any practice or procedure, but rather clarifies
and codifies existing practice. Furthermore, the proposed action is exempt from the CEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA applies
only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment because most new development in the City is required to underground
utilities along their frontage and this does not change that requirement.
The City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt from
CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c) which exempts from review the
replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving a
negligible or no expansion of capacity. For existing utility systems that are required to be
placed underground, there will be a negligible or no expansion of capacity. The City
Council further finds that the adoption of the Ordinance is categorically exempt pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(d) which exempts from review the replacement or
reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located
on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose
and capacity replaced including conversion of overhead electric utility distribution facilities
to underground including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines
where the surface is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding.
For any new development where the undergrounding of utilities is required, the City
Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(d) which exempts from review the construction of and
location of new small facilities and structures including water main, sewage, electrical,
gas, and other utility extensions including street improvements, of reasonable length to
serve such construction.
Section 7.Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any
final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this
Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Page 477
Page 6 of 6
6
1
0
3
Section 8.Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ____________, 2025, and was passed at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on
____________, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 478
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
Claudia Vargas, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of
Ordinance No. 1046, to Adopt Zoning Map Amendment to Change the
Zoning Map Designation for Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-2, and
16072-3, Located at the North West Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and
Wilson Avenue, from Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) to Low Residential
(L), to Ensure Consistency with the Configuration and Development
Standards of a Previously Approved 359 Lot Single-Family Residential
Subdivision, Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of
Traditional Neighborhood. This Project Qualifies for an Exemption Under
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as the Proposed Zoning
Map Amendment will not have any Direct Impact on the Environment.
(DRC2025-00141) (ORDINANCE NO. 1046) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommends the City Council conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 1046,
to be read by title only, to amend the city zoning map for parcels in tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-
2 and 16072-3 from Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) to Low Residential (L) and making a
determination of exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act.
BACKGROUND:
Site Characteristics and Land Use/Zoning
The project site comprises of approximately 150.79 acres across Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-
2, and 16072-3. It is located on Wilson Avenue, between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, in
the northeastern portion of the city. The parcels are rectangular in layout and currently graded,
subdivided into 359 single family residential lots.
The existing land use, General Plan, and zoning designations for the project site and surrounding
properties are as follows:
Page 479
Page 2
3
0
1
9
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Currently: Neighborhood
Estates 2 (NE-2)
North Vacant General Open Space and
Facilities
Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FU/UC)
South CVWD Facility/
Residential
General Open Space and
Facilities Very Low (VL)/Parks (P)
East Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Neighborhood Estates 2
(NE-2)
West Single-Family
Residence Suburban Neighborhood Low Residential (L)
Figure 1 – Site Map
Legislative Context
The project site was originally entitled under Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16071, which was
approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004, and subsequently by the City Council
on June 16, 2004. The project was subdivided into 359 single family residential lots. Due to a
combination of local and state mandated time extensions under the Subdivision Map Act, there
were a series of extensions of the tentative maps and by 2021, the final maps had not been
recorded.
Page 480
Page 3
3
0
1
9
In December 2021, the City adopted the current General Plan, which designates the project area
as Traditional Neighborhood. To implement the new General Plan, the City adopted a new
Development Code and updated the Zoning Map in May 2022. The project area was assigned
the Neighborhood Estates 2 (NE-2) zoning designation to maintain consistency with the updated
land use policy. At that time, the tract maps still had not be recorded. In August and December of
2023, the final maps were officially recorded for all 4 tracts.
In 2024, following the recordation of the Final Maps, two developers submitted development
applications proposing single-family residential housing consistent with the approved subdivision.
During staff’s review of these development applications, it became apparent that the form-based
development standards of NE-2 zone were incompatible with the recorded subdivision layout.
Specifically, standards such as rear-loaded garages and block requirements conflicted with the
conventional suburban design established by the original map.
To resolve this regulatory inconsistency, the City initiated a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone
the subject tracts from Neighborhood Estates 2 (NE-2) to Low Residential (L). This zoning
designation more accurately reflects the standards and layout approved under the original
entitlement and aligns with the zoning of the adjacent established neighborhood to the west.
The proposed Zoning Map Amendment was heard by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed
public hearing during the Commission’s regular session on July 23rd, 2025. During that meeting,
the Planning Commission and members of the public in attendance heard a staff presentation on
the proposed amendment. Two members of the public asked general questions about the purpose
of the map and density permitted under the proposed zone. It was explained that the proposed
density is consistent with the general plan and other adjacent single family residential zones.
There were no other comments from the public. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to
adopt Resolution 2025-018 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed map
amendment.
ANALYSIS:
The City proposes a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation of Tract 16072,
16072-1, 16072-2 and 16072-3 from Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) to Low Residential (L). This
change is necessary to align the zoning with the existing 359 lot subdivision, originally approved
in 2004 under the residential development standards of the retired Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
The current Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) zone’s form-based development standards conflict
with the approved lot structure and design envisioned under the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
This includes design requirement such as rear-loaded garages and a variety of housing types that
do not match the recorded subdivision layout. In contrast, the Low Residential (L) zone reflects
conventional suburban development standards that align with the original subdivision design. This
rezoning would resolve the development challenges associated with applying Neighborhood
Estate 2 (NE-2) standards to the lots.
Consistency with the General Plan
The subject parcels maintain a General Plan land use designation of Traditional Neighborhood,
which permits up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Low Residential (L) zone allows up to 6 dwelling
units per acre, which aligns with the Traditional Neighborhood designation. The existing
subdivision of 359 lot on approximately 150.79 acres results in a density of approximately 2.3
units per acre, well within the allowable range. No changes to the General Plan designation are
proposed.
Page 481
Page 4
3
0
1
9
Environmental Review
Pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines, where it can be seen with certainty that
there is no possibility the activity in question may have significant effect on the environment, the
activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not authorize any
physical development or site disturbance and will not result in a physical change to the
environment. It merely updates the zoning designation to align with the configuration and
development standards of an existing 359 lot single-family residential subdivision that was
approved by the City Council in 2004 and finalized through recordation of the Final Map in 2023.
The new zoning designation is consistent with the site’s General Plan land use designation of
Traditional Neighborhood.
Correspondence
Prior to this hearing, 549 notices were mailed to property owners within a 660-foot radius of the
project site on August 19, 2025. On August 20, 2025, notices were published in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin. The project site was posted with physical notices on August 20, 2025. To date,
planning staff has not received any comments.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not authorize physical development or construction.
As such, there is no direct fiscal impact to the City associated with this action. Any future
development of the site will be subject to a separate review and may involve applicable fees or
assessments at that time.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed amendment achieves the City Council’s Core Values of “Working together
cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders” and “Relentless pursuit
of improvement”. By proactively initiating this zoning map amendment, the city is addressing a
regulatory inconsistency and ensuring that land use regulations are aligned with approved
subdivisions and the General Plan. This action reinforces public trust and demonstrates a
commitment to thoughtful, collaborative planning.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Minutes from the July 23rd, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting
Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Resolution 2025-018
Attachment 3 – Ordinance No. 1046
Page 482
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission
Agenda
July 23, 2025
Final Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was
held on July 23, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m.
A.Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp.
Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
Staff Present: Katherine Read, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director;
Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Justin Garcia, Deputy
Director of Engineering; Shane Adams, Deputy Fire Marshal; Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner;
Claudia Vargas, Associate Planner; Bond Mendez, Associate Planner; Miguel Sotomayor,
Principal Engineer; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B.Public Communications
Chairman Morales opened the public communications.
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 28, 2025.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling. Motion carried 3-
0-2 approved the minutes. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
D.Public Hearings
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TENTATIVE MAP, & DESIGN REVIEW –
HAMILTON LAND DEVELOPMENT – A request to subdivide 1.02 acres of land into 19 numbered
lots and 1 lettered lot including site plan and design review of 19 single-family, detached
residential units with 1 unit restricted for Very Low Income affordable housing in accordance with
State Density Bonus Law for a site located between 19th Street and Hamilton Street in the
Medium (M) Residential zone at 10295 19th Street; APN: 1076-121-17. The project qualifies as
a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects.
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20761 and Design Review DRC2024-00249).
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 1 of 12
Attachment 1
Page 483
Assistant Planner Serafin provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). She noted that the
Conditions of Approval were revised to include additional clarifying language. A redline version was
placed on the dais.
Planning Director Nakamura shared that a letter was received this afternoon by Alta Loma School
District expressing concerns about school safety. The letter had been distributed to
Commissioners via email and was also placed on the dais for their review. She indicated that the
Conditions of Approval related to Engineering Condition #5 will help provide further study on any
potential impacts.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned that there is already a lot of traffic on 19th and now this is adding
another ingress/egress out of that area. He asked Engineering what kind of thought was put in
place to handle that extra turn off of 19th, given that Mayberry is exactly to the north of that parcel.
Engineering Director Welday responded that the final plans for the project will be required to
evaluate any changes to the striping in order to ensure conflicts are avoided to that left turn and
there are no issues between Mayberry driveway street interaction.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that there will be additional traffic studies required in order to
ascertain what traffic mitigation measures might be needed along 19th Street.
Engineering Director Welday responded that a design exercise will be conducted to ensure the
design accommodates those considerations.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that no decision has been made yet because that analysis has not
been completed.
Engineering Director Welday responded that they have looked at it as part of the development
review and they are comfortable they can fit in the turn lanes that may be needed to make it work.
Vice Chairman Boling asked if it is determined that there would be a conflict, would there be a
possibility of having a right-in/right-out for the Hamilton project.
Engineering Director Welday answered that they do not currently have it conditioned that way but
that would be an option they would look at.
Chairman Morales asked Planning Director Nakamura for a brief summary of the State Density
Bonus Law and how it impacts the city.
Planning Director Nakamura provided an overview of the State Density Bonus Law and how it
impacts the city’s limitations in the development review process.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
Applicant Hamilton provided a brief PowerPoint presentation with key points on the project. 19-
units, 4 Bonus units and 1 unit is very low-income affordable. (copy on file).
Commissioner Dopp stated that for the record, the commissioners are generally not opposed to
housing projects or creating more affordable units. He shared that the commissioners attended a
conference recently, and they discussed urban strategies and how to create more synergic
communities and addressed the affordability crisis. He asked how affordable will this project be
for the average family, since having one unit does not really make it an affordable project.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 2 of 12
Page 484
Applicant Hamilton said the very low-income unit will be in the $100,000 - $200,000 range. He
said what they found out is there is a big demand for detached houses for young families.
Commissioner Dopp asked if he had a price point in mind.
Applicant Hamilton responded that the units are between 1,500 and 1,550 square feet and are
expected to be priced around $700,000.
Commissioner Dopp asked if he thinks it is affordable for people in their 20 and 30’s.
Applicant Hamilton answered that it is as affordable as it can be.
Commissioner Dopp stated that they are using all these waivers to maximize their revenue and
that it is their right but then decided that every single plan on one side of the street is going to look
exactly the same and then on the other side of the street will look the same, with almost no variety.
Is it too much to ask to have some variety in this project and make it more architecturally vivid.
Applicant Hamilton explained that the changes were made in response to the Design Review
Committee comments, aiming for a more cohesive project in line with the architect’s vision.
Commissioner Dopp responded that the state law grants him that right and respectively disagreed
with that assessment.
Vice Chairman Boling stated during the Design Review Committee meeting there were a number
of issues that were brought up and suggestions to address some of those concerns. He asked
how they would characterize the project before them tonight as compared to what was presented
at the Design Review Committee. He asked what changes, if any were made.
Applicant Hamilton answered they added a second-floor plan and made additional enhancements
to the elevations on the end units by adding some additional windows and siding.
Vice Chairman Boling asked if the color scheme between 1 and 2 had changed.
Applicant Hamilton answered no.
Vice Chairman Boling asked if any amenities were added elsewhere throughout the project.
Applicant Hamilton answered no.
Vice Chairman Boling went through all 29 Waivers being proposed and asked the Applicant to
provide how each waiver, if not approved, would preclude construction.
Applicant Hamilton answered to most of the questions, if not all, by stating it is a physical
constraint or impossibility.
Vice Chairman Boling asked about Wavier number #29; the minimum number of floor plans
elevations variations, two floor plans would be required and three elevations. He asked if he is
providing two floor plans but only one elevation.
Applicant Hamilton answered they have three different elevations, including the enhanced right
and enhanced left design.
Vice Chairman Boling asked if he added a second-floor plan, after the Design Review Committee
meeting.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 3 of 12
Page 485
Applicant Hamilton confirmed.
Vice Chairman Boling asked if Waiver number #29 could potentially be withdrawn.
Applicant Hamilton replied if that is how staff interprets it, then potentially yes.
Vice Chairman Boling commented that this is the highest number of waivers he recalls seeing on
a residential project without a master plan or development agreement and there are only 19 units.
Chairman Morales stated the applicant mentioned he has completed several of these attainable
housing developments and asked whether any of them featured more diverse architecture and
color schemes, or if they were all similarly minimal in design.
Applicant Hamilton answered he has done both.
Chairman Morales asked if he thinks having at least three-color schemes would help make it look
better.
Applicant Hamilton responded that they would be open to adding a third color scheme.
Alta Loma School District Board Member Rebecca Davies expressed concerns about student’s
safety and traffic congestion near the elementary school at Hamilton Street and requests a gate
to prevent through traffic.
Resident and friend of the Applicant, Steve Landis, expressed support of the project, stating that
it would be a positive addition to the area. He added that from a financial standpoint, if nothing is
done now, the site may never be developed.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Dopp noted that while the applicant’s intent to reduce home prices is
commendable, the core frustration lies in the sheer volume of those requests. Although the
project meets a real housing need, it shows little innovation in design or planning. Instead, it
seems the applicant focused primarily on maximizing legal allowances to push the project
through.
Commissioner Dopp talked about the gate. He expressed sympathy for Deer Canyon Elementary
and understands the dynamics on Hamilton Street in itself and concerns of what adding an extra
street will have on the community. He said that it is not being ignored but he is just unsure about
having a gate there, sometimes they add more problems than they actually solve. He asked staff
if there is a way to put in the conditions for a traffic study and have a conversation if there might
be ways to solve this problem or alternate solutions.
Planning Director Nakamura acknowledged the concerns and stated that discussions have taken
place with the school district. She emphasized the need to avoid unintended consequences from
new development and said evaluations will be conducted prior to construction to assess potential
impacts, and that the situation will continue to be monitored as it progresses. She also remarked
that the Engineering Department is typically very responsive in addressing concerns as they arise.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 4 of 12
Page 486
Vice Chairman Boling addressed a couple of the comments made by the applicant. It was
indicated that 1 out of 4 units were affordable, specific to the density bonus units. He wanted to
make sure that was clear so no one in the audience or the general public think that 1 out of 4 of
all the units are going to be affordable or attainable. The applicant also indicated, during his
presentation, that one home for one lot relegates us into a reduction to the standards. He asked
the applicant are we not subdividing this parcel into individual lots for each unit and is that not
normally how residential is developed one unit per lot, unless it is an ADU. He said there are
plenty of instances throughout the city where one unit is on one lot and deviations, waivers and
requests of this magnitude are not profitable. He expressed he does agree that the choice of
product definitely drives a number of units, and the choice of his product has driven a significant
number of waivers and reductions, and it feels like the only codes that we are following are
Building and Safety Codes and Fire Codes. Development codes are out the window.
Vice Chairman Boling addressed a comment to Alta Loma School District and the concerns that
were brought up by the Board Member. He said it is always interesting when a new development
comes into a neighborhood that has an existing school, and the school is concerned about
additional traffic and potential safety issues that might come forth as a result of adding new
housing. However, what is often forgotten, is that decades ago when existing residential housing
was there and a school was not, residents that lived in the neighborhood prior to the school, had
significant concerns about a new school going in and what traffic hazards and increased safety
measures were going to transpire. He said as it pertains to state law and the challenges the
commission faces, this is more geared to the general public and partially to staff.
Vice Chairman Boling said in regards to the Design Review Committee meeting there were
several concerns from residents, as well as commissioners, about this project; inadequate
parking, setbacks, lack of amenities, density, singular style for all units leading to a cut and paste
look and we also heard from residents the sentiment the city probably should not build housing
units like this but beyond our city boundaries, Rancho Cucamonga and other cities are being
blamed for not producing enough housing in response to a declared housing crisis but it is actually
private market forces coupled with state mandates that control the outcome of what gets built and
when, not the city. He said Rancho Cucamonga is not trying to over develop or compromise the
character of our neighborhoods, but rather, trying to follow complex state laws while fighting an
uphill battle to keep or regain local control over residential development matters.
Vice Chairman Boling stated what we are dealing with here is the untenable scenario of state
bureaucrats and developers taking over how our community is built. We the city are often the
ones forced to implement the consequences of a one size fits none state policy or mandates
passed in Sacramento which then affects our neighborhoods. He said if the community is upset
from this reality, he strongly encourages them to hold their state elected officials accountable and
push for reform. He said here in Rancho, we are doing everything we can to navigate the state-
imposed requirements while trying to protect the character and quality of life that makes Rancho
Cucamonga a world class city.
Chairman Morales mentioned that the applicant is willing to do three color schemes and asked
staff how we can take him up on his offer.
Planning Director Nakamura responded if the commissioner would like to entertain this, staff has
prepared a Condition of Approval that could be added to the project. It would state; prior to the
issuance of building permits, a minimum of three-color schemes shall be provided subject to
Planning Director review and approval.
Vice Chairman Boling asked the Assistant City Attorney that of the remaining waivers that are on
the table, is there any legal grounds for us denying any of the remaining waivers that have been
requested.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 5 of 12
Page 487
Assistant City Attorney Read explained that per state law, the standard is you have to make
specific findings based on substantial evidence that the proposed development would have a
significant adverse impact on public health or safety, and this requires significant quantifiable
direct and unavoidable impacts based on objective identified written public or health safety
standards. She recalled the applicant mentioned Waiver number #29 potentially being removed
from the list. She recommended that the Chairman ask the applicant to come back up to state
that on the record.
Chairman Morales invited the applicant back to the podium.
Applicant Hamilton stated that as long as what we have are considered two floor plans and three
elevations, then we do not seem to need that wavier.
Planning Director Nakamura stated she had staff do additional research on this and they do not
believe the current enhancement was considered an additional elevation, it would have to be of
a separate design. She said the wavier can be proposed and modified since they did provide two
floor plans because they had the primary and reverse floor plan but that it would need to maintain
the elevations as only one was provided.
Vice Chairman Boling stated Waiver number #29 could be amended to reflect the request of three
distinct elevations being waived as opposed to the two floor plans.
Applicant Hamilton agreed.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution
2025-019 to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20761 and Design Review DRC2024-00249
with the amendments to the Conditions of Approval adding three-color schemes and the
affirmation amendments to Conditions #3 and #6 for Planning, and #5 for Engineering and staffing
conditions to amend Waiver number #29 to element the wavier for two floor plans. Motion carried
3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz
D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, DESIGN
REVIEW, MINOR EXCEPTION – TRUE LIFE COMPANIES - A request for site plan and
architectural review of a mixed-use project comprised of 50 multi-family units including 10
live/work units, and a tentative tract map for condominium purposes located on approximately 2.3
acres of land within the Neighborhood General 3 (NG3) Zone, located on the southwest corner of
Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; APN: 0208-432-16. This item is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section 15332
SUBTT20708, Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109, Minor Exception
DRC2025-00055).
Associate Planner Mendez provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Dopp asked staff if there were conversations with the developer about traffic calming
devices on that major north-south street near the development, like speed humps to make it a bit
more difficult for the average vehicle to see it as a short cut.
Associate Planner Mendez responded that while there is nothing preventing vehicles from driving
through, the section of Ruby Avenue includes two speed humps that will help reduce vehicle speeds
and slow traffic down.
Vice Chairman Boling asked staff for clarification on the speed hump for Ruby Avenue.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 6 of 12
Page 488
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 7 of 12
Associate Planner Mendez clarified that the extension of Ruby Avenue with the speed humps applies
only on the project site.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
True Life Properties Vice President Gordon Jones introduced Applicant David Stearn who
provided a brief PowerPoint presentation to the Commissioners. (copy on file).
Commissioner Dopp asked the applicant what work experience does their firm have with live/work
units, and what do they see in terms of potential out there to develop those units. He said, for the
record, it has been his contention that live/work units usually do not hit the metric for retail. This is not
a site that is super conducive to retail, but the mixed-use component still needs to be there.
Applicant Stearn answered they have a fair amount of experience with it. He mentioned there are
some challenges with this site such as the grade being 4 ft. below Base Line. Also, they have an
existing retaining wall the city built that preserves that grade, and they have the access easement
they share with assisted living facility. He said that makes a true retail site challenging here.
There are a couple of unique things the city asked for them to do; 1) There is a restriction renting
them out. 2) It is not set up for food uses. He said as a benefit, there are two entrances with a
separate residential entrance from the entrance to the commercial space.
Commissioner Dopp asked whether anything would prevent someone from using the space for
storage.
Applicant Stearn responded that Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) include
provisions for annual garage inspections to ensure they are being used for actual parking rather
than storage and noted that these measures can be expanded.
Commissioner Dopp expressed concern about the units facing a major corridor and emphasized
the importance of establishing clear guidelines to prevent owners from making unauthorized
modifications.
Vice Chairman Boling clarified that the parking management plan includes provisions for periodic
inspection of the garage spaces. He noted that enforcement would primarily be handled by the
Homeowners Association (HOA), with city enforcement serving as backup if necessary.
The following persons commented on the project: Suzanne Luegering, Jennifer Diaz, Kristine
Hatanaka, Travis T van Bibber, and Ronald Rempel.
Included the following concerns/comments:
Traffic
Trash
Design does not fit with neighborhood
Ruby Avenue connection
Setback
Homeless
Privacy
Parking
Crime/Safety
Replace with a park
Page 489
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation
of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted. The actual correspondence
should be referred to for details:
Letter from California Housing Defense Fund reminding the city of its obligation to abide by
the relevant state laws.
Email from Kristine Hatanaka expressed concerns about safety, traffic, parking, noise
pollution, crime and obstructed views.
Email from James and Karen Cordova expressed concerns on the parking and traffic.
Email from Patrick and Angelina Soto noted concern about backyard view and building mass,
amenity area setback and parking.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Applicant Stearn responded to the setback concern, stating that considerable time was spent
ensuring all utilities worked. He added that they made every effort to honor 30-foot setback from
the property line.
Commissioner Dopp noted public testimony was heard. He said he would like to have more
conversations with developers that are open, and flexible. He said we are going to look at the
project that is placed in front of them with the parameters given by the General Plan. Some of
the resident’s concerns about setbacks are reasonable and some concessions were made by the
developer. He asked staff if there is a way to add a condition or through code compliance to
ensure those units are used as live/work.
Planning Director Nakamura reiterated his concern that the live/work unit will not actually be used
as work use space. She noted that the applicant plans to include this requirement in the deed
restrictions as part of the CC&Rs upon purchase. She added that enforcement could potentially
begin with the HOA and, if necessary, be followed by the city.
Associate Planner Mendez added that this site does require a non-residential component because
the project is including 3,000 sq. ft. of non-residential floor place, the property is held to that. It could
not be legally converted or used as a residential space. If that were to happen, there would be a
response to that through Code Enforcement to correct that action because that space itself also has
separate occupancy from the residential component of that unit.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that we heard an example presented by the developer of what could
be built in order to put things in perspective that they have scaled back, and they did a good job
of identifying the maximum extreme on this site and we heard residents speak to the extreme on
the other side. He said, a developer could do a more intense project and alternatively, residents
could all pony up the money, buy it from the developer and leave it vacant. He said that when he
first heard about this project, his concern was the northbound ingress/egress. He understood
initially there may not have been an alignment of Amethyst for this project and that would have
been horrendous to have an offset entry, that was concerning to him, but it has been worked out
through an agreement with the residential housing facility.
Vice Chairman Boling addressed one of the concerns that came up a few times by residents, that
this type of project being placed here; project good, placement bad. He said in traditional urban
planning you have to have some kind of transition from single-family residential to something else
because it cannot all be single-family residential. At Base Line, if you look across the street, you
have a shopping center and at Archibald, you have true retail. He said having mixed-use serves
as a buffer, as something to take you from this to that. The project, as proposed, is in between
and is even more residential than retail in that the 10 live/work units cannot support true retail.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 8 of 12
Page 490
You cannot put food or retail store front where your customer base is coming through constantly,
since there is not enough parking, and the visibility is not good. It is not conducive to that type of
retail business. He said what it is conducive to is professional services. Those type of businesses
in this development are less impactful to the surrounding community than if it had been built out
with a more traditional retail space. He noted that he applauds them for providing something less.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that we saw a project earlier tonight and in contrast with another
developer, this developer had reduced the bedroom in one unit in order to address the city and
community concerns of meeting the parking requirements. That is profit margin they had taken
out. They addressed landscaping in order to help with privacy and visibility to the neighboring
houses. They relocated HVAC units to address noise concerns from the community. They
addressed some of the privacy issues, they changed the number of windows and the type of
windows and the placement in order to help ensure greater privacy. He said those types of
compromises are what makes this process work. As opposed to state mandates and having the
developer force us to approve projects some might consider to be lousy. He expressed how he
appreciated the communities’ inputs, and he hopes they appreciate that some developers are
listening and are working to try their best to address their concerns. The commissioners work
hard on behalf of the community as dedicated volunteers, striving to ensure that the highest-
quality projects are brought into the community.
Chairman Morales expressed his support for building for-sale homes rather than apartments
noting that homeowners are more likely to take pride over ownership. He thanked the residents
for their participation and efforts in helping to improve the development. He also expressed
appreciation for the developer’s responsiveness to the concerns raised by the community and for
listening to their needs.
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution
2025-021 to recommend approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20708,
Design Review DRC2024-00108, Master Plan DRC2024-00109 and Minor Exception DRC2025-
00055. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz
D3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend
Section 16.36.09 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, repeal Planning Commission
Resolution 87-96, and add Chapter 17.84 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning
undergrounding overhead utilities. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action.
Principal Engineer Miguel Sotomayor provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Dopp asked whether the commissioners will see at any point what the determinations
have been on undergrounding on a specific project.
Planning Director Nakamura responded that it could be included if that determination is made
early on during the review process.
Commissioner Dopp recommended including it as an addendum. He asked about the six regions
in-lieu fees previously collected, if they would get deposited into the respective bank.
Engineering Director Welday explained that since the fees were collected citywide, they would
likely be allocated to projects within the six regions as needs arise. If a project is underfunded,
the regional bank would be used to cover the gap.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 9 of 12
Page 491
Commissioner Dopp said he noticed parts of the south side of Foothill are not included in the
focus areas and asked what the reason was for not being included, especially on the eastern end
of town.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor explained that the focus areas correspond to those identified in the
General Plan.
Commissioner Dopp explained that his reasoning is based on the idea that if Foothill is being
presented as the major corridor, it should logically be the primary focus area.
Engineering Director Welday added that the focus areas are aligned with the General Plan the
way the ordinance is currently written. He said there is also a provision in the ordinance that
requires undergrounding in adopted specific plan areas. He said for most part, the areas along
Foothill have been undergrounded and the areas that have not been undergrounded likely would
not fall into any of the categories for exemptions anyway.
Vice Chairman Boling clarified that we have projects that would require undergrounding but not
right now because it is unfeasible for that particular developer to do it, in which case, they would
pay in-lieu fees. He asked if there are projects that would be exempt from having to pay in-lieu
fees.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor confirmed that there would be and said it would be spelled out in the
ordinance.
Vice Chairman Boling reaffirmed there will be three types of projects that would be under
consideration; 1) Those that would require undergrounding, 2) Those that would pay the in-lieu
fees which would be used at a future time when sufficient funds are collected to pay for the total
underground project, 3) Those projects that would be accepted. He asked what would happen if
money is being used that was collected in another area of town in order to make up some
deficiency that exists, and now that area has to be underground and the money had already been
spent.
Engineering Director Welday explained that the dollars that have been collected are not delegated
to any particular region, they are delegated city wide. He said they would have to go back and
look at nearly 50 years of transactions to try to untangle that. The cleanest way to do it is to look
at it as there is still a general benefit within those regions and going forward, they would segregate
it into the regions and before that they would have to use it as a bank to supplement the projects
that are in each of those regions.
Vice Chairman Boling asked what happens to the undergrounding of the area where that first
project 50 years ago paid their in-lieu fees, and now and now it is going to be undergrounded.
Where did those dollars come from.
Engineering Director Welday said he is not sure he is following, adding that there seems to be a
lot of hypotheticals.
Vice Chairman Boling stated it seems like we are leap frogging the money, but we will figure it
out.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 10 of 12
Page 492
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondence was received after the preparation
of the agenda packet expressing support of the proposed ordinance. The actual correspondence
should be referred to for details:
Letter from Esoteric Homes
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned that streamlining parts of the process makes a lot of sense. He
emphasized that as a discussion moves forward to City Council, it is important to understand the
outcomes of projects, especially when utilities like wiring are involved, so they can develop a
holistic vision of what future developments might look like.
Vice Chairman Boling expressed his appreciation for the callout regarding the exemptions related
to the focus areas. He also said he valued the clearly defined appeal process, noting that it will
certainly help developers and project applicants. He added that these measures encourage
responsible development in streamlined infill projects and expressed gratitude for the hard work
of the Engineering department.
Chairman Morales stated that the commissioners had previously reviewed some projects that
required undergrounding, which raised concerns due to limited frontage. He noted this will fix it
and make it better.
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution
2025-022 to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Section 16.36.09
and adding Chapter 17.84 to the Municipal Code. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent: Commissioner
Daniels and Commissioner Diaz
D4. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA – A request to amend
the zoning map designation for Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-2, and 16072-3, totaling
approximately 150.79 acres, to amend the zoning designation from neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-
2) to Low Residential (L), and ensure consistency with the configuration and development
standards of a previously approved 359 lot single-family residential subdivision, in a manner
consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Traditional Neighborhood. This project
qualifies for an exemption under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), as the proposed
zoning map amendment will not have any direct impact on the environment. Tracts 16072, 16072-
1, 16072-2, and 16072-3. (Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141).
Associate Planner Claudia Vargas provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
Resident Stephen P. Gutierrez expressed concerns about noise, increased traffic, trash and
crime.
Resident Erick Space had questions about zoning and requested clarification if any new lots
would be created.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.
Planning Director Nakamura confirmed that no new lots would be created and amending the
zoning designation would allow the developer to use the same development standards and the
homes to the west.
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 11 of 12
Page 493
HPC/PC Final Minutes – July 23, 2025
Page 12 of 12
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution
2025-018 to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend the zoning map as
presented in the Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141. Motion carried 3-0-2. Absent:
Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
E.Director Announcements
Planning Director Nakamura announced we have been awarded the Award of Merit which makes
us the second-best Planning Agency in the State of California this year. She also mentioned that
the next Planning Commission meeting will take place in the Tri-Communities Room due to
construction in the Council Chambers.
F.Commission Announcements - None
H.Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling, seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the
meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department
Approved:
Page 494
Attachment 2
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
1
ORDINANCE NO. 1046
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP
AMENDMENT DRC2025-00141, A REQUEST TO AMEND
THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FOR TRACTS 16072,
16072-1, 16072-2, AND 16072-3, TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 150.79 ACRES, TO CHANGE THE
ZONING DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD ESTATE
2 (NE-2) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (L), AND ENSURE
CONSISTENCY WITH THE CONFIGURATION AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF AN EXISTING 359 LOT
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, IN A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF TRADITIONAL
NEIGHBORHOOD, AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM
CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
A.The City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”) is proposing to amend the
official Zoning Map to change the zoning designation for Tracts 16072, 16072-1, 16072-
2, and 16072-3, which collectively comprise approximately 150.79 acres. These tracts
are located within the northeastern portion of the City and were previously subdivided into
359 parcels for single-family residential development. The Final Maps for these tracts
were recorded between August and December of 2023.
B.The City has prepared Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141, as
described in the title of this Ordinance, to implement the zone changes. Hereinafter in
this Ordinance, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as the “application” or
“Amendment.”
C.The City is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution
and laws of the State of California.
D.The Amendment changes the zoning designation of the subject tracts from
Neighborhood Estate 2 (NE-2) to Low Residential (L) to better align with the original
subdivision configuration and applicable General Plan Land use designation of Traditional
Neighborhood.
E.On July 23, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a noticed continued public hearing with respect to the Amendment
and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted Resolution No. 25-018 recommending that
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment.
Attachment 3
Page 499
2
F.On September 3rd, 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing on the amendment and concluded said hearing on
that date.
G.All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
SECTION 2. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
A.Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Section 1, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
B.Findings.
1)Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-reference public hearing, this Council hereby finds and concludes that
the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan goals, policies, and
implementation programs. The existing General Plan Land Use Map designation for the
subject parcels is Traditional Neighborhood, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed Low Residential (L) zoning allows up to 6 dwelling units per acre and is an
appropriate implementing zone. The Amendment restores consistency between the
Zoning Map and the 359-lot subdivision approved in 2004 and recorded in 2023. The
Amendment provides development standard more appropriate to the configuration of the
approved Final Maps and support implementation of the General Plan’s housing goals.
2)The Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The
Amendment assigns the zoning designation of Low Residential (L), which most closely
reflects the development standard under which the subdivision was originally approved
in 2004 under the now retired Etiwanda North Specific Plan. No construction or physical
modification are proposed under this action, and future developments will be reviewed
under a separate application in accordance with current City processes.
3) The Amendment has been processed, including, but not limited to,
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
C. CEQA. The City finds that the Amendment is exempt from environmental
review pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which states that
where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the activity may have a
significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The application
is for a Zoning Map Amendment only and does not authorize any physical development.
The proposed zoning change aligns with the existing subdivision of 359 lots approved in
2004 and is consistent with the current General Plan land use designation of Traditional
Neighborhood. Therefore, the application will not have any specific impacts on the
environment.
Page 500
3
D. Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141. Based on the
findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it,
the City Council hereby approves Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00141 as set forth
in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
E. Zoning Map Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the official
Zoning Map reflecting the amendments set forth in Exhibit A.
F. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any section,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any
reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance,
and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions,
sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
G. Enforcement. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any
other Ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of
ordinances, which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be
construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation
thereof.
H. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30)
days after its adoption and shall be published or posted as required by law.
I. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
J. Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to conflict with the City’s approvals of
the Final Maps for Tracts 16072,16072-1, 16072-2, and 16072-3. Such maps are
intended to be consistent with the Amendment adopted under this Ordinance.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Page 501
4
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
23rd day of September, 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 502
5
Page 503
Zoning Map Amendment
DRC2025-00141
September 3 rd , 2025
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Zoning Map Amendment 2
•Location: Northwest corner of Etiwanda and
Wilson Avenue
•359 single-family lots across 150.79 acres
•Originally approved in 2004, final maps
recorded in 2023
•Current zone: Neighborhood Estates 2 (NE-2)
•Proposed zone: Low Residential (L)
•On July 23, Planning Commission recommended
unanimously that the Council approve subject
zoning map amendment.
Zoning
Project Site
Wilson Ave
Et
i
w
a
n
d
a
A
v
e
Ea
s
t
A
v
e
CURRENT ZONING
Wilson Ave
Ea
s
t
A
v
e
Et
i
w
a
n
d
a
A
v
e
PROJECT SITE
•Zoning Change: Neighborhood Estates 2 to Low
Residential
•Purpose: Align zoning with recorded subdivision
•Parcels: Existing 359 lots remain unchanged, no new
parcels created.
•Consistency: Matches approved subdivision, adjacent
Low Residential zoning, and Traditional Neighborhood
General Plan Designation.
Zoning Map Amendment 6
PROPOSED PROJECT
•Per State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)
(3), where it can be seen with certainty that
there is no possibility that the activity in question
may have a significant effect on the
environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA;
Zoning Map Amendment 7
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
•Notices were mailed to all property owners within
660 feet (549 property owners) on August 19,
2025
•Published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on
August 20, 2025.
•The project site was also posted with physical
notices on August 20, 2025
•Staff has received multiple emails in response to
the notice.
Zoning Map Amendment 8
NOTICING
•The map amendment only involves the
property highlighted in red here;
•The zoning map amendment only would
allow for single -family residential
development;
•This zone change does not change the
number of lots which were previously
approved in 2004;
•Equestrian trail;
•Wilson Avenue to be completed.
Zoning Map Amendment 8
NOTICING (Cont.)
Ea
s
t
A
v
e
Wilson Ave
Et
i
w
a
n
d
a
A
v
e
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council
approve Ordinance No. 1046 to rezone Tracts
16072, 16072-1, 16072-2 and 16072-3 from
Neighborhood Estates 2 to Low Residential and
find this action exempt from CEQA under
Section 15061(b)(3).
Zoning Map Amendment 10
2025-09-03 – Regular Meeting: Correspondence received on Public Hearing Item G1
From: Kristin Berzins <kristinberzins@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 10:43 AM
To: Planning, City <City.Planning@cityofrc.us>
Subject: DRC2025-00141. Zone admenment
[You don't often get email from kristinberzins@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
Dear Planning commision and city council, As residents in the immediate area we are very
concerend about the zoning change. When we built our home it was zoned for estate
homes and horse trails were required on each property. Now it appears that condos are
being proposed on our street with commerical. This is detrementail to the home lifestyle
we sought and why we chose this area. The traffic is already a nightmare in the area and
adding higher density would add to that. Not to mention the crime that commercial
building would bring by bringing people to the area. I am concerned that the city is only
looking for more tax revenue and not keeping what was supposed to be a equestrian area
intact. Out property values are alsmost certain to decline with this change.
Sincerely,
Brian Berzins
From: Richard Santucci <rsantucci@live.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 12:45 PM
To: Planning, City <City.Planning@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Zoning map amendment DRC2025-00141
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
I live in Rolling Pasture Place and am concerned with the equestrian status. Will this
change? Also, has there been an environmental impact study of the additional traffic and
congestion, especially during school season? Finally, what precautions will be made to
deter traffic from using our neighborhood as a short cut?
Regards,
Richard Santucci
Get Outlook for iOS
You don't often get email from rsantucci@live.com. Learn why this is important
From: Lisa N. Davis <mdsdoll2@aol.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 2:34 PM
To: Planning, City <City.Planning@cityofrc.us>; Lisa Unger <mdsdoll2@aol.com>
Subject: East Ave and Wilson Zoning
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
From Lisa Unger
To whom it may concern.
This building area has been an actual disaster from the begining. From Landslides on the corner of
our entrance to mud in our homes, pools cars etc. To the Tune of thousands of dollars of repair.
As of yesterday the wind was blowing gently and the dust was blowing profusely. This has been an
inconsiderate construction site from day one and shame on the city for allowing this.
Our next issue is the danger of trying to get out of our development. It is impossible especially 1
hour prior to school starting and up to 1 hr later. Cars are making u turns on our street we have
children walking and riding bikes to school and it is dangerous.
Once these homes/condos are built the traffic will be even more of a danger. We have requested
traffic lights to exit our street safely, We would also ask the city to install gates on the north
entrance of our street and on East Ave entrance to our homes on Philly.
We again, beg for a traffic light and to be considered having the builder or city install the 2 gates to
protect our area.
Thank you ,
Lisa and Jeff Unger
Lisa N. Davis
Director of Patient Education
Unger Primary Care Concierge
9220 Haven Ave Suite #230
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Office: 951-255-5575
Fax:909-899-5012
website: ungerprimarycare.com
You don't often get email from mdsdoll2@aol.com. Learn why this is important
From: Latrevia Palacios <latreviapalacios@icloud.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 2:01 PM
To: Planning, City <City.Planning@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Opposition to Rezoning and Proposed Development – DRC2025-000141 / Tract 20791
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
Opposition to Rezoning and Proposed Development – DRC2025-000141 / Tract 20791
Dear City Council Members and Planning Department,
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2025-000141) and
related Notice of Filing (Tract 20791) that seeks to rezone approximately 150.79 acres within Tracts
16072-1, 16072-2, and 16072-3 from Neighborhood Estate (NE-2) to Low Residential (L).
1. Inconsistency with Comprehensive Plan: The City’s Comprehensive Plan and long-standing
zoning policies emphasize the protection of existing neighborhood character, the preservation of
estate-zoned properties, and the safeguarding of scenic corridors. NE-2 zoning was put in place to
ensure low-density, estate-style living consistent with the surrounding community. Reverting to “L”
undermines these policies and sets a precedent for dismantling carefully planned land use
protections.
2. Direct Impact on Surrounding NE-2 Properties: Owners of adjacent NE-2 parcels invested in their
properties with the reasonable expectation of quiet enjoyment, larger lots, and stable property
values. Rezoning to allow higher-density development and mixed commercial use (as identified in
the Notice of Filing: 73 condominium units and 16 commercial spaces) would directly diminish
these values and compromise the estate character.
3. Traffic and Safety Concerns: The rezoning would bring significantly increased traffic onto local
roads not designed for higher volumes associated with multifamily or mixed-use developments.
This is particularly concerning near the residential streets bordering the subject parcels, where
congestion will affect families, pedestrians, cyclists, and school traffic. Of which, we already have
2 schools in addition to the school district offices all located on East Ave.
4. Loss of Scenic Views and Community Enjoyment: The subject parcels sit along a highly visible
corridor with mountain views that define Rancho Cucamonga’s identity. The proposed
condominium and commercial development will obstruct these views, negatively affecting the
quality of life for nearby residents. Blocking mountain views not only harms enjoyment but also
erodes the long-term property values of adjacent homes.
5. Conflict with Prior Approvals: The public notice states that the proposed change is intended to
align with a “previously approved 359-lot single-family subdivision.” However, this is misleading.
That prior approval was under a single-family residential context consistent with estate zoning—not
a dense mix of condos and commercial spaces. Expanding the entitlement to commercial and
multifamily uses is inconsistent with both the intent and the promises made to surrounding
property owners.
6. Legal and Procedural Issues: California planning law requires rezoning decisions to remain
consistent with the City’s General Plan. Introducing commercial and multifamily use on land
previously designated for estate and low-density single-family housing contradicts the plan’s stated
You don't often get email from latreviapalacios@icloud.com. Learn why this is important
land use goals. The City risks legal challenges by approving rezoning that lacks both demonstrated
need and compatibility with established zoning districts.
7. Notice of Filing and Applicant Proposal: The Notice of Filing on Tract 20791 clearly indicates
development plans by Vigorous W Rancho LLC for 73 condominium units and 16 commercial
spaces. This is a dramatic shift from the NE-2 estate vision, and it will disproportionately burden
adjacent residents with traffic, noise, blocked views, and depressed property values.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the City Council and Planning Commission to deny the
rezoning request and reject the associated development proposal. Preserving the NE-2 designation
is vital to maintaining Rancho Cucamonga’s community character, protecting property values, and
upholding the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for prioritizing the long-term interests of current
residents.
PS. We are not alone in our opinion, as the entirety of our community shares this concern.
Sincerely,
Mario and Latrevia Palacios
latreviapalacios@me.com and mariopalacios.makhoul@gmail.com
Latrevia Palacios, MBA, REALTOR®
California Real Estate Broker
Email: latreviapalacios@me.com
Direct/Text: 909.728.1061
DRE: 01476008
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering/City Engineer
Alberto Felix, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed
Rail Station Access Study and to Direct Staff to Pursue Options to
Implement the Improvements. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
Receive and file the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study; and
Direct staff to pursue options to implement the improvements through the use of Measure
I or other grant opportunities.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been working with Brightline West (BLW) and the San
Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) since 2020 to bring high-speed passenger
rail from Las Vegas, Nevada to Rancho Cucamonga, California. This first-in-the-nation 218-mile
high-speed passenger rail line (over 186 mph) will begin/end in Las Vegas, Nevada, near the west
end of the city, parallel to the 15-freeway corridor, with stops in Apple Valley and Hesperia before
reaching its other beginning/end at Cucamonga Station in the HART District of Rancho
Cucamonga. BLW’s station at Cucamonga Station is expected to be approximately 80,000 square
feet with over 5,000 parking spaces for Brightline and Metrolink customers.
The train station will be collocated with the existing Cucamonga Station for Metrolink (Los Angeles
to San Bernardino) and with a transfer, BLW passengers will have access to anywhere along the
Metrolink line, including to downtown Redlands or Los Angeles, as well as direct access to Ontario
International Airport through the SBCTA ONT Connector tunnel, or through the West Valley
Connector to Victoria Gardens. BLW’s project is expected to generate more than $10 billion in
economic impact across the two states, with over 35,000 construction jobs and 1,000 permanent
jobs. The trains are fully electric with overhead catenary lines that use most of the power from
emissions free sources and are built by Siemens here in the United States. Those same trains
will remove over 400,000 tons of CO2 per year and reduce vehicle miles traveled by over
700,000,000 per year.
The introduction of the BLW high-speed rail station at Cucamonga Station presented the need to
assess and evaluate impacts related to anticipated increased traffic volumes on Milliken Avenue
between the SR-210 and the I-10 Freeways. The City was also keen to gain understanding and
insight into the type and level of improvements that would be needed to accommodate the
Page 504
Page 2
2
9
5
1
increased traffic on Milliken Avenue as well as to provide for adequate traffic circulation to, from,
and within Cucamonga Station. Therefore, on February 15, 2023, the City Council approved a
funding agreement between SBCTA and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the preparation of
the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study (Study), and on April 17, 2024
the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Fehr & Peers to complete the
task. Fehr & Peers has completed the study and has provided findings and strategies for the City
to be able to fully understand and plan for the future impact of the BLW station and service
operation.
ANALYSIS:
To better understand the potential traffic impacts of the new BLW station on the City’s street
network, the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study includes the analysis of
anticipted trip generation and distribution of new trips related to the planned high-speed
passenger rail station, evaluation of the Level of Service (a measure of the anticipated travel delay
of a street or at an intersection based on traffic volumes, patterns and street configuration) for
major and critical minor intersections along Milliken Avenue between the SR-210 and I-10
Freeways, determination of additional capacity needs along Milliken Avenue, and conceptual
plans and cost estimates for those capacity improvements based on the results of the traffic
analysis. Throughout the completion of the study, SBCTA has been a working partner with the
City and was given the opportunity to provide comments before finalizing the report. A copy of the
finalized study is provided as Attachment 1.
The analysis prepared by Fehr & Peers, in consultation with City Staff, assumed a lower public
transit mode split and a higher self-drive mode when compared to the assumptions in the
Environment Impact Study (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration for the BLW
project. The revised mode split better reflects local understanding of travel patterns and thus
provides a more realistic trip estimate of how many passengers would arrive at the Cucamonga
station using public transit versus the number of passengers that would drive and park at the
station compared to the EIS.
The Study found anticipated impacts to eight (8) intersections along Milliken Avenue due to the
addition of the BLW high-speed rail station service operation. Of those impacted, six (6)
intersections are fully within City of Rancho Cucamonga jurisdiction, one (1) is shared with the
City of Ontario, and one (1) is within Caltrans jurisdiction:
Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road
Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard
Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route
Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court
Milliken Avenue and 7th Street
Milliken Avenue and 6th Street
Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Shared with Ontario)
Milliken Avenue and I-10 Westbound Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway (Caltrans jurisdiction)
The total estimated improvements along Milliken Avenue are approximately $23 million, including
intersections outside of Rancho Cucamonga. The study has outlined a phased approach to
minimize both budgetary and quality of life impacts to the City and those traveling along the
Milliken corridor, respectively. While most of the improvements are related to signal timing and
Page 505
Page 3
2
9
5
1
the addition of travel lanes, the study also recommends a new signal be constructed at Milliken
Avenue and Azusa Court. Brightline West has already agreed to construct the new traffic signal
as part of the construction of the high-speed rail station project. The City will partner with the
neighboring agencies and work on a path of implementing the recommended improvements
outside of the City’s jurisdiction.
In summary, the study recommends improvements for each of the following intersection in two
phases:
Recommended Phase 1 Improvements - $11,901,200
Milliken Avenue / Foothill Boulevard
o Signal timing changes
o Signal modifications
Milliken Avenue / Azusa Court
o Install a traffic signal (Brightline West to construct)
o Right-of-way acquisition and lane additions
Milliken Avenue / 7th Street
o Signal modifications
o Right-of-way acquisition and lane additions
Milliken Avenue / Arrow Route
o Signal timing changes
o Signal modifications
o Right-of-way acquisition and lane additions
Recommended Phase 2 Improvements - $10,840,800
Milliken Avenue / Base Line Road
o Signal timing changes
Milliken Avenue / 6th Street
o Signal modifications
o Right-of-way acquisition and lane additions
Milliken Avenue / 4th Street
o Signal timing changes
o Signal modifications
o Right-of-way acquisition and lane additions
Milliken Avenue / I-10 Westbound Ramps
o Signal timing changes
o Add turn lane
Attachment 1 provides a more detailed description of improvements for each intersection as well
as a cost estimate for each location. Recommended improvements are proposed to be added to
the City’s Major Projects Program as part of our Projects in the Rough list (i.e., the list of projects
identified as needed in the near future but currently unfunded) and the conceptual plans and cost
estimates prepared by Fehr & Peers will be used to pursue grants and other outside funding
sources.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action at this time. However, the study has identified $23 million
in infrastructure improvements that are anticipated to be needed. At this time (apart from the traffic
signal being constructed by Brightline West) these improvements are unfunded. Therefore, the
City will need to pursue funding either through allocation of funding from a future update to
Page 506
Page 4
2
9
5
1
Measure I (if approved by voters), other grant programs, or a combination of both. As funding
sources are identified for some or all of the improvement and becomes available, staff will
recommend updates to the Major Projects Program through the annual budgeting process.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Councils mission by working to provide a safe, efficient, accessible,
and equitable transportation system that serves the mobility needs of all users. Further, this item
will ensure that the City intentionally embraces and anticipates the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
Page 507
Rancho Cucamonga
High Speed Rail
Station Access Study
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
July 2025
OC24-1057
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 508
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1
Project Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
Level of Service (LOS) Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 1
Multi-Modal Access Analysis........................................................................................................................................... 2
Next Steps............................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Report Organization ............................................................................................................................................................ 7
2. Project Characteristics .............................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Project Scenario Development ........................................................................................................................................ 8
2.2 Project Mode Split ................................................................................................................................................................ 9
2.3 Project Trip Generation ....................................................................................................................................................10
2.4 Project Trip Distribution ...................................................................................................................................................16
2.5 Project Trip Assignment ...................................................................................................................................................16
3. Analysis Methodologies ......................................................................................................... 23
3.1 Analysis Scenarios...............................................................................................................................................................23
3.2 Data Collection ....................................................................................................................................................................23
3.3 Traffic Forecasting ..............................................................................................................................................................24
3.4 LOS Analysis Methodology .............................................................................................................................................25
3.5 Intersection LOS Criteria ..................................................................................................................................................26
3.6 LOS Analysis Assumptions ..............................................................................................................................................26
4. Traffic Operations Assessment .............................................................................................. 29
4.1 Existing Roadway Facilities ..............................................................................................................................................29
4.2 Existing Year (2024) Intersection Operations ...........................................................................................................30
4.3 Opening Year (2027) Intersection Operations ........................................................................................................33
4.4 Future Year (2050) Intersection Operations .............................................................................................................38
4.5 Queueing Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................................44
5. Roadway Improvements ......................................................................................................... 46
Intersection 3: Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road ......................................................................................................46
Intersection 4: Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard .............................................................................................47
Page 509
Intersection 5: Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route ........................................................................................................48
Intersection 6: Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court .........................................................................................................51
Intersection 7: Milliken Avenue and 7th Street................................................................................................................54
Intersection 8: Milliken Avenue and 6th Street................................................................................................................57
Intersection 9: Milliken Avenue and 4th Street................................................................................................................60
Intersection 10: Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway .................................................................64
6. Bicycle and Pedestrian Access ............................................................................................... 67
6.1 Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................................................................67
6.2 Existing and Planned Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................................71
6.3 Recommended Improvements ......................................................................................................................................71
7. Public Transportation Access ................................................................................................. 74
7.1 Existing and Planned Transit Services .........................................................................................................................74
7.2 Recommended Improvements ......................................................................................................................................77
8. Implementation and Next Steps............................................................................................ 79
8.1 Next Steps ..............................................................................................................................................................................79
8.2 Phasing ....................................................................................................................................................................................79
Phase 1: Opening Year Improvements ......................................................................................................................79
Phase 2: Future Year Improvements ..........................................................................................................................80
Appendices
Appendix A: Streetlight Data Trip Distribution Figures
Appendix B: Existing (2024) Turning Movement Counts
Appendix C: Pending and Approved Development Projects
Appendix D: LOS Worksheets
Appendix E: Queue Worksheets
Appendix F: Intersection Improvement Constraint and Cost Estimate Fact Sheets
Page 510
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 2: Project Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
Figure 3: Passenger Car Project Trip Distribution ................................................................................................................. 17
Figure 4: Shuttle Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 5: Opening Year (2027) All Vehicles on Site Project Trip Assignment ............................................................ 19
Figure 6: Opening Year (2027) Shuttles Scenario Project Trip Assignment ............................................................... 20
Figure 7: Future Year (2050) All Vehicles on Site Project Trip Assignment ................................................................ 21
Figure 8: Future Year (2050) Shuttles Scenario Project Trip Assignment .................................................................... 22
Figure 9: Rancho Cucamonga Layered Roadway Network ............................................................................................... 28
Figure 10: Existing (2024) Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements ..................................................................... 31
Figure 11: Opening Year (2027) No Project Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements .................................. 34
Figure 12: Opening Year (2027) Plus Project All Vehicles on Site Peak Hour Intersection Turning
Movements ................................................................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 13: Opening Year (2027) Plus Project Shuttles Scenario Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements
......................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 14: Future Year (2050) No Project Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements ....................................... 39
Figure 15: Future Year (2050) Plus Project All Vehicles on Site Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements
......................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 16: Future Year (2050) Plus Project Shuttles Scenario Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements 41
Figure 17: Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design ......................... 50
Figure 18: Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design .......................... 53
Figure 19: Milliken Avenue and 7th Street Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design ................................ 56
Figure 20: Milliken Avenue and 6th Street Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design ................................ 59
Figure 21a: Milliken Avenue and 4th Street Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design ............................. 62
Figure 21b: Milliken Avenue and 4th Street Intersection Improvements Conceptual Design ............................. 63
Figure 22: Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway Intersection Improvements Conceptual
Design ........................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Figure 23: Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................................. 70
Figure 24: Proposed Station Area Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements .................................................................. 73
Figure 25: Existing and Planned Transit Services .................................................................................................................. 75
Page 511
List of Tables
Table 1: Rancho Cucamonga Station Existing and Proposed Transit Services ............................................................ 3
Table 2: Opening Year (2027) Project Mode Split ................................................................................................................ 10
Table 3: Future Year (2050) Project Mode Split ..................................................................................................................... 10
Table 4: On-Site Parking Supply Evaluation............................................................................................................................ 11
Table 5: Opening Year (2027) All Vehicles On-Site Scenario Trip Generation Estimates ...................................... 12
Table 6: Opening Year (2027) Shuttles Scenario Trip Generation Estimates ............................................................. 13
Table 7: Future Year (2050) All Vehicles On-Site Scenario Trip Generation Estimates .......................................... 14
Table 8: Future Year (2050) Shuttles Scenario Trip Generation Estimates .................................................................. 15
Table 9: Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Grades ............................................................................................................. 25
Table 10: Existing Year (2024) Intersection Operations ...................................................................................................... 32
Table 11: Opening Year (2027) Intersection Operations.................................................................................................... 37
Table 12: Future Year (2050) Intersection Operations ........................................................................................................ 42
Table 13: Opening Year (2027) and Future Year (2027) Plus Project 95 th Percentile Queuing Results ........... 44
Table 15: Queue Jump Feasibility Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 77
Table 16: Opening Year (2027) Improvements Cost Estimates ....................................................................................... 79
Table 17: Future Year (2050) Improvements Cost Estimates............................................................................................ 80
Page 512
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
1
Executive Summary
Fehr & Peers prepared this transportation study to analyze the proposed access to and from Rancho
Cucamonga Station in Rancho Cucamonga, California. In addition to serving existing Metrolink and
Omnitrans transit services, the station will function as the southern terminus of the Brightline West High
Speed Rail train service between Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada.
This study evaluated 11 intersections along Milliken Avenue between SR-210 and I-10 to determine if
improvements would be required to maintain intersection operations above the City’s Level of Service
(LOS) thresholds. This study also evaluated pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit access to and from the
station.
Project Characteristics
Trip generation estimates were prepared that accounted for the various modes of travel passengers would
utilize to access the station. Trip generation was also refined to account for the planned parking structure
on-site and potential under-supply of on-site parking in the future year.
Two trip generation scenarios were studied: All Vehicles on Site and Shuttles. The All Vehicles on Site
scenario assumes that all future parking demand will be accommodated on-site, which would require
additional parking capacity and results in higher vehicle activity near the station. The Shuttles scenario
assumes no additional on-site parking supply will be constructed in the future year and that up to 62
percent of parking demand will park off-site within five miles of the station area. These passengers would
utilize shuttles to travel between off-site parking facilities and the station. The location of off-site parking
has not been identified.
In the Opening Year (2027), the Brightline West High-Speed Rail is expected to generate between 431 and
631 peak hour vehicle trips, with project volumes highest in the Weekday PM peak hour. By 2050, this
rises to between 715 and 1,483 peak hour vehicle trips, peaking during the Friday PM peak hour.
Level of Service (LOS) Analysis
The study evaluated Opening Year (2027) and Future Year (2050) intersection LOS for three peak hour
periods (AM, PM, and Friday PM) and two trip generation scenarios. These LOS results were compared to
no project LOS results.
• Under Existing (2024) Conditions, all study intersections operate above their LOS threshold
except:
◦ Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday PM)
Page 513
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
2
• Under Opening Year (2027) Plus Project Conditions, three intersections operate below their LOS
threshold:
◦ Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Weekday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street (Weekday PM)
• Under Future Year (2050) Plus Project Conditions, six intersections operate below their LOS
threshold:
◦ Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road (Weekday AM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and 6th Street (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM)
◦ Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
Improvements to traffic signal timing, traffic signal hardware, and lane geometry are recommended for
eight intersections, which are detailed in Chapter 6.
Multi-Modal Access Analysis
Bicycle and pedestrian access to and from the station is currently served by a Class II bike lane and
sidewalk along Milliken Avenue. Improvements are recommended to connect to the City’s active
transportation network including a Class I shared use path along Milliken Avenue and pedestrian safety
improvements.
The station is served by two Omnitrans fixed route bus routes and Metrolink commuter rail. Future transit
projects including the West Valley Connector bus rapid transit (BRT) and ONT Connector will provide
additional transit service to the station. Improvements to signal operations and on-site transit circulation
are recommended to improve transit reliability in the study area.
Next Steps
The City should review the recommended improvements and begin the process to incorporate them into
the Capital Improvement Plan. These improvements will require environmental review, engineering
design, utility coordination, and right-of-way acquisition prior to construction. Funding sources will also
need to be identified.
Page 514
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
3
1. Introduction
Fehr & Peers completed a transportation study for the Cucamonga Station project (Project) located at the
northwest corner of Azusa Court and Milliken Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (City).
This report summarizes the methodology, findings, and conclusions of the analysis. The analysis
comprises of a Level of Service (LOS) assessment, identification of recommended improvements for
deficient intersections, and a review of multi-modal access to and from the Project. Fehr & Peers and
Mark Thomas also prepared cost estimates and identified barriers to implementation for proposed
improvements.
1.1 Project Description
The proposed project is located at the northwest corner of Azusa Court and Milliken Avenue, currently
occupied by the Metrolink Rancho Cucamonga Station. The Rancho Cucamonga Station will function as a
regional transportation hub for the Inland Empire and broader Southern California region and is the
proposed southern terminus of the Brightline West high-speed rail line to Las Vegas, Nevada that is
expected to begin in 2027. The Rancho Cucamonga Station will also be served by existing and proposed
public transportation services including the Metrolink San Bernardino Line, Omnitrans fixed route buses,
and the Omnitrans West Valley Connector bus-rapid-transit (BRT) line between Pomona and Victoria
Gardens. The station will also be the northern terminus of the proposed ONT Connector personal-rapid-
transit project between the Rancho Cucamonga Station and Ontario International Airport. Existing and
proposed transit services are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Rancho Cucamonga Station Existing and Proposed Transit Services
Transit Service Existing Frequency Proposed Frequency Project Status
Metrolink San Bernardino
Line Every 30-60 minutes Every 30 minutes Operation
Omnitrans Fixed Route
Buses
Route 82: Every 60 minutes
Route 380: Every 35-60
minutes
Route 82: Every 60 minutes
Route 380: Every 35-60
minutes
Operation
Omnitrans West Valley
Connector BRT N/A Peak: Every 10 minutes
Off-Peak: Every 15 minutes Under Construction
Brightline West High-Speed
Rail N/A Every 45-60 minutes Design/
Pre-Construction1
ONT Connector Personal
Rapid Transit N/A “On-demand” personal
shuttles Environmental Review
Note: 1Brightline West is currently under construction in Las Vegas. Pre-construction activities underway in California.
Source: Metrolink, Omnitrans, Brightline West, 2024.
Page 515
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
4
As part of the Brightline West project, proposed station improvements include a new 3,450 space parking
structure for Brightline West passengers, a designated kiss-and-ride/taxi/rideshare pick-up and drop-off
area, a new station building for ticketing and passenger waiting, and other buildings associated with train
operations. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 1.
Access to the station is provided from Azusa Court, which connects with Milliken Avenue. Secondary
access is provided by 7th Street and Anaheim Place. Regional traffic to and from the site utilizes Milliken
Avenue to connect with Interstate 10, Interstate 15, and State Route 210.
1.2 Study Area
As shown in Figure 2, the study area focuses on the Milliken Avenue corridor, an arterial roadway that
provides connections to regional highways and prominent destinations within the cities of Rancho
Cucamonga and Ontario. Study intersections were selected based on project trip generation and trip
distribution estimates. Intersection operations were analyzed at 11 major intersections along Milliken
Avenue:
1. Milliken Avenue and SR-210 WB Ramps
2. Milliken Avenue and SR-210 EB Ramps
3. Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road
4. Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard
5. Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route
6. Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court
7. Milliken Avenue and 7th Street
8. Milliken Avenue and 6th Street
9. Milliken Avenue and 4th Street
10. Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB Ramps
11. Milliken Avenue and I-10 EB Ramps
Page 516
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
5
Figure 1: Project Site Plan
Page 517
Mi
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Mi
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Foothill Blvd
Arrow Route
Azusa Ct
7th St
6th St
4th St
10
15
21012
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Figure 2
Project Site and Study Intersections
Project Site
Study Intersections#
Page 518
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
7
1.3 Report Organization
The report is divided into the remaining chapters as described below:
Chapter 2 – Project Characteristics presents relevant Project information such as the analysis scenarios,
project trip generation, mode share, distribution, and assignment.
Chapter 3 – Analysis Methodology describes the data collection processes, methods, assumptions, and
criteria used to prepare future year traffic forecasts and analyze level of service (LOS).
Chapter 4 – Traffic Operations Assessment describes existing and planned roadway facilities and the
LOS results for the Existing (2024), Opening Year (2027), and Future Year (2050) analysis scenarios.
Chapter 5 – Roadway Improvements details recommended improvements to facilitate side access and
at intersections that are forecasted to operate below the LOS threshold.
Chapter 6 – Bike and Pedestrian Access analyzes existing and planned bike and pedestrian facilities in
the study area and provides recommendations for active transportation access to and from the station.
Chapter 7 – Transit Access reviews existing and planned transit services in the study area and identifies
recommendations for enhancing transit access to and from the station.
Chapter 8 – Implementation and Next Steps presents construction constraints and planning level cost
estimates for the recommended improvements identified in Chapters 5-7.
Page 519
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
8
2. Project Characteristics
This chapter provides an overview of the proposed Project components and addresses the proposed
Project’s trip generation, distribution, and assignment characteristics, allowing for an evaluation of the
Project’s effect on the surrounding roadway network. The amount of traffic associated with the Project
was estimated using a five-step process:
1. Project Scenario Development – Understanding project operations and identifying peak travel
times for trips to and from the Project site.
2. Project Mode Split – Reviewing what travel modes riders will use to access the station.
3. Trip Generation – Estimating the amount of vehicle traffic entering/exiting the project site.
4. Trip Distribution – Determining the direction of trips approaching and departing the site.
5. Trip Assignment – Trips were then assigned to specific roadway segments and intersection
turning movements.
2.1 Project Scenario Development
Fehr & Peers referenced the proposed Brightline West operating schedule and Streetlight origin-
destination data to analyze travel patterns between Southern California, the High Desert, and Las Vegas
(see Appendix A). This data helped identify the peak travel times which would have the highest potential
for generating street traffic. Through this analysis and coordination with City staff, Fehr & Peers
determined that the most critical periods for evaluating trip generation and distribution are:
Typical Weekday AM Peak (reflecting typical weekday morning peak hours)
Typical Weekday PM Peak (typical weekday evening peak hours)
Friday PM Peak (reflecting the higher demand of Las Vegas-bound passengers on Friday
evenings)
Sunday PM Peak (reflecting the higher demand of Rancho Cucamonga-bound passengers on
Sunday evenings)
These peak periods are anticipated to capture the largest share of travelers and coincide with the periods
where overall traffic volumes are highest. This approach enabled the development of traffic scenarios
focused on the most significant times for station use, ensuring infrastructure would be appropriately sized
to accommodate overall peak demand. While demand is expected to vary over the course of the year and
peak during major holidays, these scenarios were excluded to avoid oversizing roadways for peak
weekends.
Page 520
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
9
2.2 Project Mode Split
Mode split refers to the way people travel to and from a project, including by personal car, pick-up/drop-
off, and public transit. Fehr & Peers reviewed mode split assumptions in the Brightline West
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and existing mode split data for trips within Rancho Cucamonga to
develop a project mode split. Consistent with the EIS, it is assumed that 23 percent of all Brightline
passengers will transfer to or from Metrolink regional trains to complete their trips. Mode split was
analyzed for the remaining trips that would begin or end at the Rancho Cucamonga station.
The study establishes separate mode splits for high-speed rail passengers (those traveling to and from Las
Vegas), commuters (those traveling to and from the High Desert), and Brightline employees. Following
consultations with City staff, Fehr & Peers determined a lower public transit mode split and a higher self-
drive and park mode split would be more appropriate compared to the assumptions in the EIS. Transit
mode shares of four percent and eight percent for high-speed rail passengers and commuters,
respectively, were assumed in the opening year. These were developed by considering:
Existing Rancho Cucamonga transit mode share (two percent), San Bernardino County commute
transit mode share (one percent), and statewide commute transit mode share (five percent)
Limited existing transit service in the area
Different propensities for transit between commuters (who would be using transit for a first/last
mile connection) and high-speed rail riders (who would be traveling long distances with luggage)
Between opening and future years, the transit mode split is forecasted to increase due to increased transit
service in the area including the West Valley Connector bus rapid transit (BRT) and BRT along Foothill
Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
Tables 2 and 3 list the proposed mode split and average vehicle occupancy (AVO) for project trips in the
opening and future year, respectively. Note that the share of commuters self-driving and parking is also
expected to increase as the number of commuters traveling to the High Desert for employment is
expected to increase.
Page 521
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
10
Table 2: Opening Year (2027) Project Mode Split
HSR Riders Commuters Employees
Mode Share AVO Mode Share AVO Mode Share AVO
Self-Drive and
Park 77% 1.85 15% 1.18 100% 1.18
Pick Up/Drop
Off 4% 1.85 21% 1 0% N/A
Taxi/TNC 15% 1.85 55% 1 0% N/A
Public Bus/
Charter Bus 4% 20 8% 20 0% N/A
Walk/Bike <1% 1 1% 1 0% N/A
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Twenty three percent of all project trips were assumed to be Metrolink transfer to HSR service. The mode split presented in this table
are the remaining HSR project trips.
Table 3: Future Year (2050) Project Mode Split
HSR Riders Commuters Employees
Mode Share AVO Mode Share AVO Mode Share AVO
Self-Drive and
Park 71% 1.85 30% 1.18 100% 1.18
Pick Up/Drop
Off 4% 1.85 15% 1 0% N/A
Taxi/TNC 15% 1.85 44% 1 0% N/A
Public Bus/
Charter Bus 10% 20 10% 20 0% N/A
Walk/Bike <1% 1 1% 1 0% N/A
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Twenty three percent of all project trips were assumed to be Metrolink transfer to HSR service. The mode split presented in this table
are the remaining HSR project trips.
2.3 Project Trip Generation
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to
the surrounding roadway system. Estimates for the Project scenarios were created for the four peak hour
conditions identified in Section 2.1.
Trip generation was estimated using ridership estimates provided in the Brightline West EIS and
accounted for the adjusted project mode split and AVO described previously. Parking supply was also
evaluated to determine the number of self-drive and park vehicle trips that can be accommodated on-
site. As shown in Table 4, 14 percent of parking demand is not accommodated on-site in the opening
year; this rises to 62 percent in the future year. Consistent with the Brightline West EIS, these vehicles are
Page 522
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
11
anticipated to park at off-site parking facilities within five miles of the project site and use shuttles to
access the station.
Table 4: On-Site Parking Supply Evaluation
Opening Year (2027) Future Year (2050)
Parking Supply (# of spaces) 3,450 3,450
Peak Parking Demand (# of spaces) 3,995 8,970
HSR Riders (# of spaces) 3,814 8,503
Commuters (# of spaces) 81 367
Employees (# of spaces) 100 100
Difference (Demand – Supply) 545 5,520
Percent of Parking Demand Not Accommodated On-Site 14% 62%
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Based on this finding, Fehr & Peers developed two trip generation scenarios for each peak period:
• All Parking On-Site Scenario – Assumes all parking demand will be accommodated on site. This
represents a “highest traffic volume” scenario and would require construction of additional on-
site parking supply, which has not currently been identified in the proposed station area plan.
• Shuttles Scenario – Assumes on-site parking facilities are fully occupied during peak periods
(most weekends). Trips that cannot be accommodated by on-site parking demand are supported
by shuttle service to off-site parking locations (specific locations have not been identified but are
assumed to be primarily south of the station).
Trip generation estimates are presented in Tables 5-6 for Opening Year (2027) conditions and Tables 7-8
for Future Year (2050) conditions. Sunday evening trip generation estimates were developed; however,
given the lower adjacent street traffic volumes compared to weekdays, further LOS analysis was not
completed.
Page 523
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
12
Table 5: Opening Year (2027) All Vehicles On-Site Scenario Trip Generation Estimates
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Friday PM Peak Hour Sunday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
HSR Riders
Self-Drive/
Park 75 50 124 90 135 225 214 54 268 54 214 268
Pick Up/
Drop Off 6 6 12 12 12 24 14 14 28 14 14 28
Taxi/TNC 24 24 48 44 44 88 52 52 104 52 52 104
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2
Commuters
Self-Drive/
Park 11 7 18 4 16 20 3 11 14 1 3 4
Pick Up/
Drop Off 30 30 59 34 34 68 24 24 48 7 7 14
Taxi/TNC 78 78 155 89 89 177 62 62 123 19 19 38
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Employees Self-Drive/
Park 8 18 25 15 10 25 15 10 25 15 10 25
TOTAL 232 214 447 290 342 631 386 228 613 163 321 484
Page 524
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
13
Table 6: Opening Year (2027) Shuttles Scenario Trip Generation Estimates
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Friday PM Peak Hour Sunday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
HSR Riders
Self-Drive/
Park 64 43 107 78 116 194 185 46 231 46 185 231
Pick Up/
Drop Off 6 6 12 12 12 24 14 14 28 14 14 28
Taxi/TNC 24 24 48 44 44 88 52 52 104 52 52 104
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2
Commuters
Self-Drive/
Park 9 6 15 4 14 18 2 10 12 1 3 4
Pick Up/
Drop Off 30 30 59 34 34 68 24 24 48 7 7 14
Taxi/TNC 78 78 155 89 89 177 62 62 123 19 19 38
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Employees Self-Drive/
Park 8 18 25 15 10 25 15 10 25 15 10 25
Shuttles 2 2 4 3 3 6 4 4 8 3 3 6
TOTAL 223 208 431 280 324 603 360 223 583 159 295 453
Page 525
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
14
Table 7: Future Year (2050) All Vehicles On-Site Scenario Trip Generation Estimates
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Friday PM Peak Hour Sunday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
HSR Riders
Self-Drive/
Park 128 85 213 154 231 384 512 128 641 131 525 656
Pick Up/
Drop Off 12 12 24 22 22 44 36 36 72 37 37 74
Taxi/TNC 45 45 90 81 81 162 135 135 270 139 139 278
Public Bus 2 2 4 3 3 6 5 5 10 4 4 8
Commuters
Self-Drive/
Park 51 34 85 16 66 82 16 62 78 3 10 13
Pick Up/
Drop Off 50 50 100 48 48 96 46 46 92 8 8 16
Taxi/TNC 148 148 296 142 142 284 134 134 268 23 23 46
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0
Employees Self-Drive/
Park 15 36 51 31 20 51 28 23 51 25 25 51
TOTAL 451 413 864 497 613 1,112 913 570 1,483 370 771 1,142
Page 526
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
15
Table 8: Future Year (2050) Shuttles Scenario Trip Generation Estimates
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Friday PM Peak Hour Sunday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
HSR Riders
Self-Drive/
Park 49 33 82 59 89 148 197 49 246 50 202 252
Pick Up/
Drop Off 12 12 24 22 22 44 36 36 72 37 37 74
Taxi/TNC 45 45 90 81 81 162 135 135 270 139 139 278
Public Bus 2 2 4 3 3 6 5 5 10 4 4 8
Commuters
Self-Drive/
Park 20 13 33 6 25 32 6 24 30 2 9 11
Pick Up/
Drop Off 50 50 100 48 48 96 46 46 92 8 8 16
Taxi/TNC 148 148 296 142 142 284 134 134 268 23 23 46
Public Bus 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0
Employees Self-Drive/
Park 15 36 51 31 20 51 28 23 51 25 25 51
Shuttles 17 17 34 37 37 54 41 41 82 38 38 76
TOTAL 358 356 715 420 458 879 629 494 1,123 327 485 812
Page 527
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
16
2.4 Project Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution refers to the directions of approach and departure that vehicles would use to
travel to and from the Project site. Local knowledge of the study area, Streetlight travel pattern data and
statistics, and the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM+) were used to develop a
Project trip distribution. Separate trip distributions were prepared for passenger cars and shuttles.
Approximately 80 percent of passenger car trips are anticipated to be regional and utilize the following
freeway interchanges:
• I-10 and Milliken Avenue
• I-15 and Fourth Street
• I-15 and Foothill Boulevard
• SR-210 and Milliken Avenue
Figure 3 presents the proposed project trip distribution of passenger cars and Figure 4 presents the
project trip distribution of shuttles.
2.5 Project Trip Assignment
Based on the trip generation and trip distribution estimates developed and described above, Project trips
were assigned to the study area roadway network. Opening Year (2027) and Future Year (2050) Project
trip assignments for the four study scenarios are provided in Figures 5 through 8.
Page 528
Passenger Car and Pick-Up/Drop-Off
Trip Distribution
Figure 3
Baseline Rd
Foothill Blvd
Arrow Route
6th St
4th St
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Da
y
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Ha
v
e
n
A
v
e
1%
10%
1%
2%
15
%
13%
2%
1%
2%
15%20%
1%
2%
2%
10%
2%
1%
!"15
!"10 !"10
!"15
·210 ·210
X%
Station Area
Trip Distribution
Page 529
Shuttle/Public Transportation
Trip Distribution
Figure 4
Baseline Rd
Foothill Blvd
Arrow Route
6th St
4th St
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Da
y
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Ha
v
e
n
A
v
e
!"15
!"10 !"10
!"15
·210 ·210
0%
5%
0%
5%
15
%
10%
0%
0%
5%
15%15%
0%
10
%
5%
10%
5%
0%
X%
Station Area
Trip Distribution
Page 530
Figure 5
Project Trip Assignment
Opening Year (2027) Plus Project All Vehicles On Site AM/PM/Friday PM
29
(
4
5
)
[
3
1
]
2
(
4
)
[
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2
(
3
)
[
4
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
24 (30)[39]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
31
(
4
9
)
[
3
4
]
23
(
3
5
)
[
2
4
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
31 (38)[51]
26
(
3
3
)
[
4
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
2
(
4
)
[
3
]
54
(
8
4
)
[
5
8
]
2
(
4
)
[
3
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
2 (3)[4]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
57
(
7
1
)
[
9
4
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
2 (3)[4]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
6
(
8
)
[
6
]
58
(
9
2
)
[
6
4
]
22
(
3
3
)
[
2
3
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
6 (7)[9]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
61
(
7
7
)
[
1
0
2
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
23 (28)[37]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
86
(
1
3
3
)
[
9
3
]
7
(
1
0
)
[
7
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
90
(
1
1
2
)
[
1
4
8
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
7 (9)[11]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
16
4
(
1
3
4
)
[
1
6
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
93 (143)[100]
89 (182)[141]
97
(
1
2
1
)
[
1
5
9
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
44
(
5
4
)
[
7
8
]
16
4
(
1
3
4
)
[
1
6
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
46 (76)[49]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
89
(
1
8
2
)
[
1
4
1
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
20
3
(
1
8
1
)
[
2
3
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
3 (4)[5]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
3
(
4
)
[
3
]
13
0
(
2
4
9
)
[
1
8
4
]
2
(
4
)
[
3
]
2 (3)[4]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
210 WB On-Ramp 210 WB Off-Ramp
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
94
(
1
1
4
)
[
1
5
1
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
70 (19)[21]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
15
(
6
5
)
[
6
3
]
79
(
1
2
7
)
[
8
2
]
36
(
5
7
)
[
3
9
]
39 (48)[64]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
57
(
6
9
)
[
9
1
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
37 (45)[60]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
34
(
5
3
)
[
3
6
]
45
(
7
4
)
[
4
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
0 (0)[0]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ramps Ontario Mills Parkway
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
8
(
9
)
[
1
1
]
49 (60)[80]
0 (0)[0]
40
(
6
7
)
[
4
1
]
5
(
7
)
[
5
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
210 EB Off-Ramp 210 EB On-Ramp
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
[XX]Project Site
Page 531
Figure 6Project Trip AssignmentOpening Year (2027) Plus Project Shuttle Scenario AM/PM/Friday PM
28
(
4
3
)
[
3
0
]
2
(
3
)
[
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2
(
3
)
[
4
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]23 (29)[37]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
30
(
4
6
)
[
3
3
]
22
(
3
3
)
[
2
4
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]30 (37)[47]
25
(
3
2
)
[
4
1
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
2
(
3
)
[
3
]
52
(
7
9
)
[
5
7
]
2
(
3
)
[
3
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]2 (3)[4]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
55
(
6
9
)
[
8
8
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]2 (3)[4]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
5
(
8
)
[
5
]
56
(
8
5
)
[
6
3
]
21
(
3
1
)
[
2
2
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]6 (7)[8]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
59
(
7
5
)
[
9
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]22 (28)[34]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
82
(
1
2
4
)
[
9
0
]
6
(
1
0
)
[
7
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
87
(
1
1
0
)
[
1
3
8
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]7 (8)[11]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
16
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
5
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
88 (134)[97]89 (177)[140]
94
(
1
1
8
)
[
1
4
9
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
41
(
5
2
)
[
7
1
]
16
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
5
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]47 (72)[49]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
89
(
1
7
7
)
[
1
4
0
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
19
6
(
1
7
5
)
[
2
2
0
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
3 (4)[4]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
2
(
4
)
[
2
]
13
1
(
2
4
2
)
[
1
8
4
]
2
(
3
)
[
3
]
2 (3)[4]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
89
(
1
1
0
)
[
1
4
0
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
70 (19)[20]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
14
(
6
5
)
[
6
2
]
82
(
1
2
4
)
[
8
3
]
35
(
5
3
)
[
3
9
]
37 (46)[60]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
54
(
6
7
)
[
8
4
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
35 (43)[56]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
33
(
5
0
)
[
3
6
]
49
(
7
4
)
[
4
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
8
(
9
)
[
1
0
]
46 (58)[74]0 (0)[0]
45
(
6
7
)
[
4
3
]
4
(
7
)
[
4
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 532
Figure 7Project Trip AssignmentFuture Year (2050) Plus Project All Vehicles On Site AM/PM/Friday PM
55
(
8
1
)
[
7
5
]
5
(
6
)
[
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
5
(
5
)
[
1
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]46 (51)[93]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
60
(
8
7
)
[
8
1
]
43
(
6
3
)
[
5
8
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]60 (66)[119]
51
(
5
6
)
[
1
0
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
5
(
6
)
[
6
]
10
3
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
3
9
]
5
(
6
)
[
6
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]5 (5)[10]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
11
1
(
1
2
2
)
[
2
2
2
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]5 (5)[10]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
9
(
1
3
)
[
1
2
]
11
3
(
1
6
2
)
[
1
5
1
]
39
(
5
7
)
[
5
3
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]10 (11)[19]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
12
1
(
1
3
2
)
[
2
4
2
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]43 (47)[84]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
16
1
(
2
3
2
)
[
2
1
6
]
13
(
1
9
)
[
1
7
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
17
4
(
1
9
0
)
[
3
4
5
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]14 (15)[28]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
24
8
(
2
1
3
)
[
3
6
2
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
174 (251)[233]158 (278)[263]
18
7
(
2
0
5
)
[
3
7
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
86
(
9
4
)
[
1
8
3
]
24
8
(
2
1
3
)
[
3
6
2
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]91 (138)[128]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
15
8
(
2
7
8
)
[
2
6
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
32
4
(
2
9
6
)
[
5
2
4
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
5 (6)[11]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
5
(
7
)
[
7
]
23
9
(
4
0
2
)
[
3
7
8
]
5
(
6
)
[
6
]
5 (5)[10]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
17
5
(
1
9
1
)
[
3
4
4
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
74 (23)[31]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
18
(
7
0
)
[
6
9
]
15
2
(
2
3
1
)
[
2
1
5
]
69
(
1
0
1
)
[
9
4
]
75 (82)[149]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
10
5
(
1
1
4
)
[
2
0
5
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
70 (77)[139]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
64
(
9
5
)
[
8
8
]
88
(
1
3
6
)
[
1
2
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
12
(
1
3
)
[
2
1
]
93 (101)[184]0 (0)[0]
80
(
1
2
4
)
[
1
1
6
]
8
(
1
2
)
[
1
1
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 533
Figure 8Project Trip AssignmentFuture Year (2050) Plus Project Shuttles Scenarioo AM/PM/Friday PM
48
(
6
0
)
[
6
5
]
4
(
4
)
[
5
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
4
(
4
)
[
6
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]37 (43)[64]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
52
(
6
4
)
[
7
0
]
37
(
4
6
)
[
5
1
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]48 (55)[83]
41
(
4
7
)
[
7
0
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
4
(
4
)
[
5
]
89
(
1
1
0
)
[
1
2
1
]
4
(
4
)
[
5
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]4 (4)[6]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
89
(
1
0
2
)
[
1
5
3
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]4 (4)[6]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
9
(
1
0
)
[
1
1
]
97
(
1
1
8
)
[
1
3
1
]
35
(
4
3
)
[
4
7
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]9 (9)[14]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
97
(
1
1
0
)
[
1
6
5
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]35 (39)[59]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
14
1
(
1
7
1
)
[
1
8
9
]
11
(
1
4
)
[
1
5
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
14
1
(
1
5
8
)
[
2
3
8
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]11 (13)[19]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
21
8
(
1
8
7
)
[
2
6
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
152 (184)[204]137 (226)[235]
15
2
(
1
7
1
)
[
2
5
7
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
65
(
7
4
)
[
1
1
8
]
21
8
(
1
8
7
)
[
2
6
6
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]77 (104)[110]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
13
7
(
2
2
6
)
[
2
3
5
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
27
4
(
2
5
2
)
[
3
7
0
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
5 (5)[8]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
5
(
5
)
[
6
]
20
5
(
3
2
1
)
[
3
3
4
]
4
(
4
)
[
5
]
4 (4)[6]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
14
1
(
1
6
2
)
[
2
4
1
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
73 (21)[26]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
18
(
6
7
)
[
6
8
]
12
8
(
1
7
9
)
[
1
8
5
]
59
(
7
5
)
[
8
1
]
60 (69)[103]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
85
(
9
7
)
[
1
4
4
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
56 (65)[97]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
55
(
7
1
)
[
7
6
]
73
(
1
0
8
)
[
1
0
9
]
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]0 (0)[0]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
0
(
0
)
[
0
]
11
(
1
1
)
[
1
6
]
74 (86)[128]0 (0)[0]
65
(
9
9
)
[
9
9
]
8
(
9
)
[
1
0
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 534
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
23
3. Analysis Methodologies
The following is a discussion of the approach and analysis methodologies associated with traffic
forecasting and LOS analysis.
3.1 Analysis Scenarios
Fehr & Peers studied peak hour intersection LOS at the previously identified study intersections for the
following seven scenarios:
• Existing (2024) Conditions: Existing traffic volumes and lane geometries were used to evaluate
existing conditions.
• Opening Year (2027) No Project Conditions: Consists of traffic volumes during the opening year
of the Project without volumes generated by the proposed Project. The opening year volumes
were developed through interpolation of the cumulative forecasts and include traffic volumes of
all approved and related projects within two miles of the project.
• Opening Year (2027) With Project Conditions – All Vehicles on Site: Traffic generated by the
Project was added to Opening Year conditions with everyone parking on site.
• Opening Year (2027) With Project Conditions – Shuttles: Traffic generated by the Project was
added to Opening Year conditions with on-site parking and off-site parking shuttle trips.
• Future Year (2050) No Project Conditions: Consists of cumulative forecasts developed for the
study area using the travel demand model (SBTAM+) and includes cumulative projects and
funded infrastructure improvements in the study area.
• Future Year (2050) With Project Conditions – All Vehicles on Site: Traffic generated by the Project
was added to Future Year conditions with everyone parking on site.
• Future Year (2050) With Project Conditions – Shuttles: Traffic generated by the Project was added
to Future Year conditions with on-site parking and off-site parking shuttle trips.
Peak hour analysis was focused on the three weekday periods (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM) as
these are anticipated to be the periods when adjacent street traffic volumes are highest.
3.2 Data Collection
Traffic counts were collected in May 2024 during a typical weekday morning peak period (7:00-9:00 AM),
typical weekday evening peak period (4:00-6:00 PM), and Friday evening peak period (4:00-6:00 PM) at
the 11 existing study intersections listed in Chapter 1. Counts were collected during fair weather, while
school was in session. The turning movement counts are provided in Appendix B.
Existing conditions were also documented in the field to understand potential right-of-way and design
constraints.
Page 535
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
24
3.3 Traffic Forecasting
The latest version of the San Bernardino County Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM+) was used to
develop Future Year (2050) forecasts. SBTAM+ is based off the SCAG regional travel demand model
(which utilizes the 2024 SCAG RTP/SCS and forecasts traffic volumes on roadway segments for the entire
six-county SCAG region). The SCAG model was refined to provide additional detail for San Bernardino
County and was calibrated for use in San Bernardino County by ensuring that the model can replicate
existing traffic volumes on County roadways after refinement. SBTAM+ is validated to 2019 with a
planning horizon year of 2050 and is considered the most appropriate tool for testing changes in land use
and roadway network in San Bernardino County.
The future year SBTAM+ is consistent with the 2024 SCAG Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable
Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Plan RC. Outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this model
assumes datasets consistent with the 2024 SCAG RTP/SCS with a base year of 2019 and a future year of
2050, each with land use and roadway network assumptions for the given year.
Fehr & Peers reviewed planned transportation improvements assumed in the model. Following
consultation with City staff, Fehr & Peers removed the following projects from the model as they are not
guaranteed to be constructed by the future year:
• RTP ID: 2000152 I-15 Arrow Route Interchange
• RTP ID: 4160049 Ontario International Airport (ONT) Loop – Direct Transit Connection between
Ranch Cucamonga Metrolink Station and ONT
3.3.1 Turning Movement Forecasts
The Base and Future Year models can produce intersection volume forecasts. National Cooperative
Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 765 prescribes a variety of methods to develop turning
movement forecasts from travel demand model outputs. In this study, the absolute difference between
the Base and Future Year model outputs were used in conjunction with Existing (2024) traffic volumes to
develop Future Year (2050) forecasts. This method, known as the difference method, is a state of the
practice approach consistent with NCHRP Report 765. To provide a conservative analysis, negative growth
was zeroed out to ensure that traffic volumes remained the same or increased based on expected growth.
Opening Year (2027) forecasts were developed by linearly interpolating between Existing (2024) traffic
volumes and Future Year (2050) forecasts and include all pending and approved projects within a two-
mile radius of the Project site.
The list of pending and approved projects is provided in Appendix C, and all approved development
projects were assumed to be in operation by 2027. ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition rates were applied to
each project that was anticipated to affect peak hour intersection operations at the study intersections.
The approved development trips were assigned to the study area based on professional judgment and
knowledge of the land uses and their typical peak hour travel patterns.
Page 536
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
25
3.4 LOS Analysis Methodology
Intersection operating conditions in the study area were evaluated using the Transportation Research
Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodology, which is considered the state-of-
the-practice methodology for evaluating intersection operations and is consistent with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino requirements.1 Fehr & Peers used the Synchro 12 software
package to facilitate the HCM calculations.
The HCM 7th Edition methodology for signalized intersections estimates the average control delay for
vehicles at the intersection. After the quantitative delay estimates are complete, the methodology assigns
a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS
A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. Descriptions
of the LOS letter grades for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Table 9.
Table 9: Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Grades
Level
of
Service
Description
Signalized
Delay
(Seconds)
Unsignalized
Delay
(Seconds)
A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or
short cycle length < 10.0 < 10.0
B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle
lengths
> 10.0 to
20.0 > 10.0 to 15.0
C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer
cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear
> 20.0 to
35.0 > 15.0 to 25.0
D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable
progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and
individual cycle failures are noticeable
> 35.0 to
55.0 > 25.0 to 35.0
E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle
lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences
> 55.0 to
80.0 > 35.0 to 50.0
F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over
saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths > 80.0 > 50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022).
The intersection operations analysis excluded traffic spillover onto Milliken Avenue from on-site queueing
at the Brightline Station. A separate station access assessment memorandum was prepared to evaluate
on-site circulation and queueing.
1 Synchro 12 prepares delay estimates and reports referencing the HCM 6th Edition Methodology, which are
consistent with HCM 7th Edition Methodology for isolated intersection analysis used in this study.
Page 537
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
26
3.5 Intersection LOS Criteria
Based on the City’s TIA Guidelines, the following performance criteria were used to determine deficiencies
at study facilities:
• City of Rancho Cucamonga – The City’s General Plan (Plan RC) Policy MA-2.8 provides the
following guidance related to LOS: Maintain LOS D for priority modes on each street; LOS E or F
may be acceptable at intersections or segments for modes that are not prioritized. Figure 9
shows the City’s layered network complete street system and pinpoints the priority modes of
travel for specific roadway classifications. Milliken Avenue is classified as an Arterial Roadway,
prioritizing automobiles and allowing bikes, pedestrians, and transit. For purposes of this study,
LOS D was utilized to identify acceptable operations for automobiles.
• City of Ontario – The Ontario Plan (The City’s General Plan) Policy M1.5 establishes an LOS E or
better threshold at all intersections in the City during peak hours. The City also maintains a list of
“enhanced intersections” where LOS thresholds can be exceeded if improvements are constrained.
The intersection of Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway is considered an
“enhanced intersection.” For the purposes of this study, LOS E was utilized to identify acceptable
operations.
• Caltrans – Caltrans no longer defines acceptable LOS standards with their latest adoption of the
Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (TISG), May 2020. This study
assumed Caltrans controlled intersections were deficient if they met the City of Rancho
Cucamonga or City of Ontario Project deficiency criteria.
Improvements were identified under opening and future year so that intersection operations conform
with the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario LOS standards, respecitvely.
3.6 LOS Analysis Assumptions
The following parameters are consistent with the City’s TIA Guidelines and were utilized in the LOS
analysis:
• Heavy Vehicle Percentages were based on traffic counts collected in the field in May 2024 for all
intersections and scenarios.
• Existing signal timings were used in all Existing (2024) and Opening Year (2027) analysis scenarios.
Existing signal timing was provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans.
• Uncoordinated signal’s timings were optimized for future scenarios. If a signal is part of a
coordinated system, the existing coordinated cycle length is maintained for future scenarios
unless changing the cycle length was part of a recommended improvement.
• Existing Peak Hour Factors (PHFs) were used in all Existing (2024) and Opening Year (2027)
analysis scenarios. A PHF of 0.95 was used in all Future Year (2050) scenarios, unless the existing
PHF was greater than 0.95.
Page 538
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
27
• Saturation flow rates were set to the flow rates recommended in the City’s Guidelines for all
Existing, Opening Year, and Future Year analysis scenarios.
• Lost time of 2 seconds per phase.
Page 539
Ca
m
p
u
s
A
v
e
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway
Metrolink
16th St
Ch
e
r
r
y
A
v
e
Ea
s
t
A
v
e
Highland Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Base Line Rd
%&'(10
CIT Y O F
UPL AND
CIT Y O F
ONTARIO
CIT Y O F
FON TAN A
Ar
c
h
i
b
a
l
d
A
v
e
Ha
v
e
n
A
v
e
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Ca
r
n
e
l
i
a
n
S
t
Arrow Hwy
Church St
Terra Vista P
k
w
y
6th St
Ro
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
Sa
p
p
h
i
r
e
S
t
He
r
m
o
s
a
A
v
e
He
l
l
m
a
n
A
v
e
Banyan St
S A N B E R N A R D I N O N A T I O N A L F O R E S T
CIT Y O F
FON TAN A
San Gabr iel M ountains
Deer
Canyon
Day
Canyon
East
Etiwanda
Canyon San
Sevaine
Canyon
County
Canyon
ChaffeyCollege
n¤
Vi
n
e
y
a
r
d
A
v
e
19th St
Hillside Rd
DEM
E
N
S
C
R
E
E
K
CH
A
N
N
E
L
C
U
C
A
M
O
N
G
A
CR
E
E
K
DA
Y
C
R
E
E
K
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
E
T
I
W
A
N
D
A
C
R
E
E
K
CH
A
N
N
E
L
SA
N
S
E
V
A
I
N
E
W
A
S
H
DA
Y
C
R
E
E
K
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
DE
E
R
DE
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
C
A
N
Y
O
N
ET
I
W
A
N
D
A
CR
E
E
K
CH
A
N
N
E
L
Almond St
Am
e
t
h
y
s
t
A
v
e
Be
r
y
l
S
t
Church St
Wilson Ave
Lemon Ave
Victoria St
Da
y
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Wa
r
d
m
a
n
B
u
l
l
o
c
k
R
d
Powerline Rd
Metrolink Station
Et
i
w
a
n
d
a
A
v
e
VictoriaGardens
4th St
Jersey Blvd9th St
Tu
r
q
u
o
i
s
e
A
v
The Epicenter
·|}þ210
%&'(10
%&'(15
//66
S P H E R E O F I N F L U E N C E
0 1 20.5 Miles °
Fehr & Peers, 2021
ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Freeway
Arterial Roadway
Transit Corridor
Collector Street
Bicycle Corridor
Multi-Use Trail
Metrolink
Rancho Cucamonga City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Railroads
Local Streets
Parks
Figure 9: Layered Roadway Network
Page 540
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
29
4. Traffic Operations Assessment
This section summarizes the study area intersection operations under Existing (2024), Opening Year
(2027), and Future Year (2050) Conditions. Peak hour analysis was focused on the three weekday periods
(Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM) as these are anticipated to be the periods when adjacent street
traffic volumes are highest.
4.1 Existing Roadway Facilities
Regional Roads
Regional roads in the Project vicinity include:
• Interstate 15 Freeway (I-15): I-15 is an interstate highway that runs in the north/south direction.
Within the region, I-15 connects the Inland Empire to San Diego, the High Desert, and Southern
Nevada. I-15 is located east of the project site and near the project study area, which is generally
an 8-lane facility (four in each direction). Access to I-15 near the Project study area is provided at
the Fourth Street and Foothill Boulevard interchanges.
• Interstate 10 Freeway (I-10): I-10 is an interstate highway that runs in the east/west direction.
Within the region, I-10 connects the Inland Empire to Los Angeles, Coachella Valley, and points
eastward. I-10 is located south of the Project site and near the Project study area is generally a
10-lane facility (five in each direction). Access to I-10 near the Project study area is provided at the
Milliken Avenue interchange.
• State Route 210 Freeway (SR-210): SR-210, also known as Foothill Freeway, is a controlled-access
freeway that runs in the east/west direction connects Los Angelos to Inland Empire. I-210 is
located north of the Project site and near the Project study area is generally an 8-lane facility (four
in each direction). Access to SR-210 near the Project study area is provided at the Milliken Avenue
interchange.
Local Access Roads
Local access roads in the Project vicinity include:
• Milliken Avenue: Milliken Avenue is classified as an Arterial Roadway and a truck route in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 6- to 8-lane facility with a raised
median. Milliken Avenue runs in a north/south direction and is located directly east of the Project
site. Near the Project site, the posted speed limit is generally 50 miles per hour.
• Azusa Court: Azusa Court is classified as a local roadway in the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s 2021
General Plan update and is a 2-lane facility. Azusa Court runs in an east/west direction and
provides primary access to the Project site. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour.
Page 541
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
30
• 7th Street: 7th Street is classified as a Collector Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s 2021
General Plan update and is a 2-lane facility. 7th Street runs in the east/west direction and is
located south of the Project site. 7th Street provides direct access to the Resort North Specific Plan
and secondary access to the Project site.
• Haven Avenue: Haven Avenue is classified as a Boulevard and a truck route in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 6-lane facility with a raised median. Haven
Avenue runs in the north/south direction and is located west of the Project site. Near the Project
site, the posted speed limit is generally 50 miles per hour.
• Baseline Road: Baseline Road is classified as an Arterial Roadway in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 6-lane facility with a raised median. Baseline
Road runs in the east/west direction and is located north of the project site. Near the Project site,
the posted speed limit is generally 50 miles per hour.
• Foothill Boulevard: Foothill Boulevard is classified as a Boulevard in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 6-lane facility with a raised median. Foothill
Boulevard runs in an east/west direction and is located north of the project site. Near the Project
site, the posted speed limit is generally 50 miles per hour.
• Arrow Route: Arrow Route is classified as an Arterial Roadway in the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s
2021 General Plan update and is a 4-lane facility with a striped median. Arrow Route runs in an
east/west direction and is located north of the project site. Near the project site, the posted speed
limit is generally 50 miles per hour.
• 6th Street: 6th Street is classified as a Bicycle Corridor and a truck route in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 4-lane facility with raised median. 6th Street runs
in the east/west direction and is located south of the Project site. Near the project site, the posted
speed limit is generally 45 miles per hour.
• 4th Street: 4th Street is classified as an Arterial Roadway and a truck route in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s 2021 General Plan update and is a 6- to 8-lane facility with raised median. 4th
Street runs in the east/west direction and is located south of the Project site. Near the Project site,
the posted speed limit is generally 50 miles per hour. 4th Street runs along the city border
between the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario, with Rancho Cucamonga maintaining the
northern half of the roadway and Ontario maintaining the southern half of the roadway.
4.2 Existing Year (2024) Intersection Operations
Existing (2024) traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10 (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, and Friday PM).
These traffic volumes along with existing intersection lane configurations and signal timings were used to
calculate the LOS for the study intersections during each peak hour. The findings of this analysis are
presented in Table 10 and detailed intersection LOS worksheets are presented in Appendix D.
Page 542
Figure 10Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts Existing Conditions (2024) AM/PM/Friday PM
42
4
(
4
9
1
)
[
5
5
5
]
71
0
(
4
8
0
)
[
4
6
0
]
20
4
(
1
5
3
)
[
1
6
0
]
86
4
(
4
5
5
)
[
3
4
3
]
353 (133)[112]7 (4)[5]236 (274)[174]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
87
5
(
9
3
4
)
[
9
1
1
]
31
6
(
3
5
6
)
[
3
0
6
]
262 (106)[108]4 (10)[7]627 (281)[327]
78
7
(
5
1
9
)
[
3
9
1
]
31
0
(
1
5
7
)
[
1
2
5
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
85
(
1
5
7
)
[
1
7
7
]
56
9
(
9
0
2
)
[
8
5
5
]
65
(
1
6
8
)
[
1
6
5
]
268 (287)[274]418 (1,098)[1,084]100 (118)[107]
41
1
(
1
4
6
)
[
2
0
2
]
87
6
(
3
7
5
)
[
3
3
6
]
12
5
(
1
2
4
)
[
1
0
4
]
139 (117)[158]938 (524)[863]214 (84)[133]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
97
(
2
4
1
)
[
2
3
9
]
27
1
(
1
,
2
4
8
)
[
1
,
1
1
0
]
70
(
3
4
3
)
[
2
7
7
]
48 (209)[201]623 (1,693)[1,487]96 (147)[161]
19
8
(
9
8
)
[
1
2
0
]
79
5
(
3
7
5
)
[
3
8
0
]
19
4
(
9
9
)
[
1
0
2
]
94 (130)[161]1,360 (917)[1,109]184 (141)[144]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
14
2
(
1
7
8
)
[
1
6
2
]
32
9
(
1
,
6
4
4
)
[
1
,
2
9
8
]
72
(
3
9
9
)
[
3
0
0
]
61 (146)[167]384 (925)[895]99 (165)[149]
14
9
(
1
1
5
)
[
9
9
]
81
3
(
5
4
8
)
[
5
3
3
]
81
(
6
2
)
[
7
4
]
111 (100)[139]977 (509)[625]177 (130)[104]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
72
0
(
1
,
9
8
9
)
[
1
,
6
6
7
]
12 (36)[26]
77
(
3
1
)
[
2
4
]
94
0
(
1
,
0
2
7
)
[
9
2
4
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
70
(
2
4
)
[
3
2
]
65
6
(
1
,
8
1
6
)
[
1
,
5
3
1
]
15
(
6
)
[
7
]
54 (132)[91]1 (2)[0]26 (65)[72]
4
(
1
0
)
[
9
]
92
1
(
1
,
0
3
7
)
[
9
4
4
]
22
(
1
)
[
5
]
7 (32)[17]1 (1)[0]8 (9)[18]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
13
0
(
1
4
2
)
[
1
7
4
]
53
2
(
1
,
3
1
7
)
[
1
,
1
8
8
]
70
(
9
8
)
[
7
2
]
122 (352)[247]219 (569)[402]90 (196)[126]
28
0
(
1
7
5
)
[
1
6
7
]
57
4
(
7
9
2
)
[
7
5
9
]
13
3
(
1
4
5
)
[
1
1
9
]
96 (210)[172]278 (290)[344]52 (70)[84]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
16
4
(
2
2
5
)
[
2
8
3
]
57
4
(
1
,
1
3
9
)
[
1
,
0
0
4
]
85
(
2
6
6
)
[
2
4
1
]
90 (228)[252]294 (834)[810]115 (309)[232]
69
(
9
7
)
[
1
3
5
]
54
4
(
8
0
9
)
[
6
9
6
]
12
6
(
2
3
4
)
[
2
2
8
]
223 (173)[188]726 (730)[852]255 (394)[300]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
10
9
(
1
8
6
)
[
1
6
5
]
64
8
(
1
,
2
0
6
)
[
1
,
0
4
2
]
24
7
(
3
5
7
)
[
3
2
2
]
434 (826)[681]111 (187)[160]256 (117)[176]
13
3
(
2
6
1
)
[
2
2
2
]
50
1
(
1
,
0
7
3
)
[
9
2
7
]
83
(
2
8
5
)
[
2
4
8
]
13 (83)[95]93 (194)[211]111 (171)[204]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
12
9
(
3
4
2
)
[
2
8
0
]
48
7
(
1
,
4
6
1
)
[
1
,
2
2
2
]
523 (293)[310]404 (104)[121]
22
4
(
6
1
3
)
[
4
8
6
]
64
2
(
7
4
4
)
[
8
1
8
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
ST
O
P
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
ccc
f
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 543
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
32
Under Existing (2024) conditions, all intersections operate at or above their LOS threshold except:
• Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday PM)
Table 10: Existing Year (2024) Intersection Operations
Intersection LOS
Threshold Peak Hour
Existing Conditions (2024)
LOS Average Delay
(s)
1 Milliken Avenue and SR-210 WB Ramps D
AM C 22.3
PM C 21.7
Friday PM C 21.8
2 Milliken Avenue and SR-210 EB Ramps D
AM C 34.7
PM B 16.5
Friday PM B 18.2
3 Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road D
AM D 38.9
PM D 37.4
Friday PM D 36.5
4 Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard D
AM D 37.7
PM D 52.0
Friday PM D 45.3
5 Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route D
AM E 75.7
PM E 61.3
Friday PM D 52.0
6 Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court D
AM B 14.3
PM C 15.5
Friday PM B 13.8
7 Milliken Avenue and 7th Street D
AM B 16.2
PM B 11.1
Friday PM A 8.4
8 Milliken Avenue and 6th Street D
AM C 32.0
PM D 44.5
Friday PM C 34.1
9 Milliken Avenue and 4th Street D
AM D 44.0
PM E 63.0
Friday PM D 51.1
10 Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB Ramps E AM D 40.9
PM D 51.1
Page 544
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
33
Intersection LOS
Threshold Peak Hour
Existing Conditions (2024)
LOS Average Delay
(s)
Friday PM D 46.0
11 Milliken Avenue and I-10 EB Ramps E
AM C 33.2
PM C 30.0
Friday PM C 30.7
Note: Bolded indicates intersection operations exceed LOS threshold.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
4.3 Opening Year (2027) Intersection Operations
As described in Chapter 3, the traffic volumes for Opening Year (2027) consist of existing counts plus the
addition of growth derived from SBTAM+ and the addition of pending and approved development
projects. Figure 11 presents the traffic forecasts utilized for Opening Year (2027) No Project Conditions
while Figures 12 and 13 present the traffic forecasts for Opening Year (2027) Plus Project Conditions (all
vehicles on site and shuttles, respectively).
The Opening Year (2027) peak hour volumes were used to calculate LOS for the study intersections during
each peak hour. Detailed intersection LOS worksheets are presented in Appendix D.
Page 545
Figure 11Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts Opening Year (2027) No Project AM/PM/Friday PM
44
0
(
5
1
0
)
[
5
6
0
]
73
0
(
5
3
0
)
[
5
1
0
]
23
0
(
1
7
0
)
[
1
7
0
]
91
0
(
4
9
0
)
[
3
9
0
]
360 (160)[140]10 (0)[10]240 (280)[190]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
90
0
(
9
7
0
)
[
9
5
0
]
33
0
(
3
6
0
)
[
3
2
0
]
270 (130)[130]0 (10)[10]630 (290)[330]
82
0
(
5
5
0
)
[
4
3
0
]
33
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
90
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
58
0
(
9
3
0
)
[
8
8
0
]
70
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
280 (290)[280]430 (1,110)[1,100]100 (120)[110]
42
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
90
0
(
4
0
0
)
[
3
6
0
]
14
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
140 (120)[160]960 (540)[840]220 (90)[130]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
11
0
(
2
5
0
)
[
2
4
0
]
30
0
(
1
,
2
6
0
)
[
1
,
1
4
0
]
80
(
3
6
0
)
[
3
0
0
]
50 (220)[210]640 (1,720)[1,540]100 (150)[170]
21
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
2
0
]
80
0
(
3
9
0
)
[
4
0
0
]
20
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
100 (130)[160]1,410 (950)[1,120]200 (150)[150]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
15
0
(
1
9
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
35
0
(
1
,
6
6
0
)
[
1
,
3
6
0
]
80
(
4
1
0
)
[
3
3
0
]
60 (160)[170]410 (940)[910]120 (170)[160]
16
0
(
1
2
0
)
[
1
0
0
]
84
0
(
5
8
0
)
[
5
7
0
]
10
0
(
7
0
)
[
8
0
]
120 (110)[150]990 (520)[630]190 (140)[120]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
76
0
(
2
,
0
3
0
)
[
1
,
7
5
0
]
10 (40)[30]
80
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
1,
0
0
0
(
1
,
0
7
0
)
[
9
8
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
70
(
4
0
)
[
4
0
]
69
0
(
1
,
8
5
0
)
[
1
,
6
0
0
]
20
(
1
0
)
[
1
0
]
70 (140)[110]0 (0)[0]30 (70)[70]
30
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
96
0
(
1
,
0
6
0
)
[
9
8
0
]
20
(
0
)
[
1
0
]
10 (30)[20]0 (0)[0]10 (10)[20]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
16
0
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
9
0
]
57
0
(
1
,
3
7
0
)
[
1
,
2
6
0
]
10
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
8
0
]
120 (350)[260]240 (580)[430]120 (230)[160]
29
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
7
0
]
60
0
(
8
2
0
)
[
7
9
0
]
13
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
2
0
]
100 (210)[180]290 (300)[350]70 (80)[100]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
19
0
(
2
4
0
)
[
2
9
0
]
63
0
(
1
,
2
0
0
)
[
1
,
0
8
0
]
11
0
(
2
8
0
)
[
2
5
0
]
100 (240)[260]300 (860)[840]140 (320)[260]
70
(
1
1
0
)
[
1
4
0
]
60
0
(
8
5
0
)
[
7
5
0
]
13
0
(
2
4
0
)
[
2
4
0
]
230 (180)[190]740 (730)[840]260 (410)[330]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
16
0
(
2
2
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
70
0
(
1
,
2
6
0
)
[
1
,
1
2
0
]
26
0
(
3
8
0
)
[
3
4
0
]
470 (840)[720]120 (190)[170]290 (140)[190]
16
0
(
3
1
0
)
[
2
7
0
]
58
0
(
1
,
1
2
0
)
[
9
9
0
]
90
(
2
9
0
)
[
2
6
0
]
10 (90)[100]110 (220)[240]130 (180)[210]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
15
0
(
3
7
0
)
[
3
2
0
]
59
0
(
1
,
5
6
0
)
[
1
,
3
4
0
]
530 (310)[330]440 (120)[140]
24
0
(
6
2
0
)
[
5
0
0
]
76
0
(
8
2
0
)
[
8
8
0
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
ST
O
P
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
ccc
f
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 546
Figure 12Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement CountsOpening Year (2027) Plus Project All Vehicles On Site AM/PM/Friday PM
46
9
(
5
5
5
)
[
5
9
1
]
73
2
(
5
3
4
)
[
5
1
3
]
23
0
(
1
7
0
)
[
1
7
0
]
91
2
(
4
9
3
)
[
3
9
4
]
360 (160)[140]10 (0)[10]264 (310)[229]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
93
1
(
1
,
0
1
9
)
[
9
8
4
]
35
3
(
3
9
5
)
[
3
4
4
]
270 (130)[130]0 (10)[10]661 (328)[381]
84
6
(
5
8
3
)
[
4
7
3
]
33
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
92
(
1
6
4
)
[
1
8
3
]
63
4
(
1
,
0
1
4
)
[
9
3
8
]
72
(
1
8
4
)
[
1
8
3
]
280 (290)[280]430 (1,110)[1,100]102 (123)[114]
42
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
95
7
(
4
7
1
)
[
4
5
4
]
14
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
140 (120)[160]960 (540)[840]222 (93)[134]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
11
6
(
2
5
8
)
[
2
4
6
]
35
8
(
1
,
3
5
2
)
[
1
,
2
0
4
]
10
2
(
3
9
3
)
[
3
2
3
]
50 (220)[210]640 (1,720)[1,540]106 (157)[179]
21
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
2
0
]
86
1
(
4
6
7
)
[
5
0
2
]
20
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
100 (130)[160]1,410 (950)[1,120]223 (178)[187]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
15
0
(
1
9
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
43
6
(
1
,
7
9
3
)
[
1
,
4
5
3
]
87
(
4
2
0
)
[
3
3
7
]
60 (160)[170]410 (940)[910]120 (170)[160]
16
0
(
1
2
0
)
[
1
0
0
]
93
0
(
6
9
2
)
[
7
1
8
]
10
0
(
7
0
)
[
8
0
]
120 (110)[150]990 (520)[630]197 (149)[131]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
16
4
(
1
3
4
)
[
1
6
7
]
76
0
(
2
,
0
3
0
)
[
1
,
7
5
0
]
93 (143)[100]99 (222)[171]
17
7
(
1
5
1
)
[
1
8
9
]
1,
0
0
0
(
1
,
0
7
0
)
[
9
8
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
11
4
(
9
4
)
[
1
1
8
]
85
4
(
1
,
9
8
4
)
[
1
,
7
6
7
]
20
(
1
0
)
[
1
0
]
70 (140)[110]0 (0)[0]76 (146)[119]
30
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
1,
0
4
9
(
1
,
2
4
2
)
[
1
,
1
2
1
]
20
(
0
)
[
1
0
]
10 (30)[20]0 (0)[0]10 (10)[20]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
16
0
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
9
0
]
77
3
(
1
,
5
5
1
)
[
1
,
4
9
6
]
10
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
8
0
]
123 (354)[265]240 (580)[430]120 (230)[160]
29
3
(
1
8
4
)
[
1
7
3
]
73
0
(
1
,
0
6
9
)
[
9
7
4
]
13
2
(
1
5
4
)
[
1
2
3
]
102 (213)[184]290 (300)[350]70 (80)[100]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
19
0
(
2
4
0
)
[
2
9
0
]
72
4
(
1
,
3
1
4
)
[
1
,
2
3
1
]
11
0
(
2
8
0
)
[
2
5
0
]
170 (259)[281]300 (860)[840]140 (320)[260]
85
(
1
7
5
)
[
2
0
3
]
67
9
(
9
7
7
)
[
8
3
2
]
16
6
(
2
9
7
)
[
2
7
9
]
269 (228)[254]740 (730)[840]260 (410)[330]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
16
0
(
2
2
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
75
7
(
1
,
3
2
9
)
[
1
,
2
1
1
]
26
0
(
3
8
0
)
[
3
4
0
]
507 (885)[780]120 (190)[170]290 (140)[190]
19
4
(
3
6
3
)
[
3
0
6
]
62
5
(
1
,
1
9
4
)
[
1
,
0
3
6
]
90
(
2
9
0
)
[
2
6
0
]
10 (90)[100]110 (220)[240]130 (180)[210]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
15
0
(
3
7
0
)
[
3
2
0
]
59
8
(
1
,
5
6
9
)
[
1
,
3
5
1
]
579 (370)[410]440 (120)[140]
28
0
(
6
8
7
)
[
5
4
1
]
76
5
(
8
2
7
)
[
8
8
5
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 547
Figure 13Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts Opening Year (2027) Plus Project Shuttle Scenario AM/PM/Friday PM
46
8
(
5
5
3
)
[
5
9
0
]
73
2
(
5
3
3
)
[
5
1
3
]
23
0
(
1
7
0
)
[
1
7
0
]
91
2
(
4
9
3
)
[
3
9
4
]
360 (160)[140]10 (0)[10]263 (309)[227]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
93
0
(
1
,
0
1
6
)
[
9
8
3
]
35
2
(
3
9
3
)
[
3
4
4
]
270 (130)[130]0 (10)[10]660 (327)[377]
84
5
(
5
8
2
)
[
4
7
1
]
33
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
92
(
1
6
3
)
[
1
8
3
]
63
2
(
1
,
0
0
9
)
[
9
3
7
]
72
(
1
8
3
)
[
1
8
3
]
280 (290)[280]430 (1,110)[1,100]102 (123)[114]
42
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
95
5
(
4
6
9
)
[
4
4
8
]
14
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
140 (120)[160]960 (540)[840]222 (93)[134]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
11
5
(
2
5
8
)
[
2
4
5
]
35
6
(
1
,
3
4
5
)
[
1
,
2
0
3
]
10
1
(
3
9
1
)
[
3
2
2
]
50 (220)[210]640 (1,720)[1,540]106 (157)[178]
21
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
2
0
]
85
9
(
4
6
5
)
[
4
9
6
]
20
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
1
1
0
]
100 (130)[160]1,410 (950)[1,120]222 (178)[184]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
15
0
(
1
9
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
43
2
(
1
,
7
8
4
)
[
1
,
4
5
0
]
86
(
4
2
0
)
[
3
3
7
]
60 (160)[170]410 (940)[910]120 (170)[160]
16
0
(
1
2
0
)
[
1
0
0
]
92
7
(
6
9
0
)
[
7
0
8
]
10
0
(
7
0
)
[
8
0
]
120 (110)[150]990 (520)[630]197 (148)[131]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
16
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
5
7
]
76
0
(
2
,
0
3
0
)
[
1
,
7
5
0
]
88 (134)[97]99 (217)[170]
17
4
(
1
4
8
)
[
1
7
9
]
1,
0
0
0
(
1
,
0
7
0
)
[
9
8
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
11
1
(
9
2
)
[
1
1
1
]
85
0
(
1
,
9
8
0
)
[
1
,
7
5
7
]
20
(
1
0
)
[
1
0
]
70 (140)[110]0 (0)[0]77 (142)[119]
30
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
1,
0
4
9
(
1
,
2
3
7
)
[
1
,
1
2
0
]
20
(
0
)
[
1
0
]
10 (30)[20]0 (0)[0]10 (10)[20]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
16
0
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
9
0
]
76
6
(
1
,
5
4
5
)
[
1
,
4
8
0
]
10
0
(
1
0
0
)
[
8
0
]
123 (354)[264]240 (580)[430]120 (230)[160]
29
2
(
1
8
4
)
[
1
7
2
]
73
1
(
1
,
0
6
2
)
[
9
7
4
]
13
2
(
1
5
3
)
[
1
2
3
]
102 (213)[184]290 (300)[350]70 (80)[100]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
19
0
(
2
4
0
)
[
2
9
0
]
71
9
(
1
,
3
1
0
)
[
1
,
2
2
0
]
11
0
(
2
8
0
)
[
2
5
0
]
170 (259)[280]300 (860)[840]140 (320)[260]
84
(
1
7
5
)
[
2
0
2
]
68
2
(
9
7
4
)
[
8
3
3
]
16
5
(
2
9
3
)
[
2
7
9
]
267 (226)[250]740 (730)[840]260 (410)[330]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
16
0
(
2
2
0
)
[
2
0
0
]
75
4
(
1
,
3
2
7
)
[
1
,
2
0
4
]
26
0
(
3
8
0
)
[
3
4
0
]
505 (883)[776]120 (190)[170]290 (140)[190]
19
3
(
3
6
0
)
[
3
0
6
]
62
9
(
1
,
1
9
4
)
[
1
,
0
3
7
]
90
(
2
9
0
)
[
2
6
0
]
10 (90)[100]110 (220)[240]130 (180)[210]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
15
0
(
3
7
0
)
[
3
2
0
]
59
8
(
1
,
5
6
9
)
[
1
,
3
5
0
]
576 (368)[404]440 (120)[140]
28
5
(
6
8
7
)
[
5
4
3
]
76
4
(
8
2
7
)
[
8
8
4
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 548
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
37
As shown in Table 11, the following two intersections are projected to operate below their LOS threshold
under Opening Year (2027) No Project conditions:
• Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday PM)
Under Opening Year (2027) Plus Project conditions, the following three intersections are projected to
operate below their LOS threshold:
• Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM and Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday PM)
Table 11: Opening Year (2027) Intersection Operations
Intersection LOS
Threshold
Peak
Hour
Opening Year No
Project (2027)
Opening Year Plus
Project All Vehicles
(2027)
Opening Year Plus
Project Shuttles
(2027)
LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s)
1
Milliken Avenue
and SR-210 WB
Ramps
D
AM C 22.5 C 24.9 C 24.9
PM C 20.9 C 22.6 C 22.6
Friday PM C 21.4 C 22.4 C 22.3
2
Milliken Avenue
and SR-210 EB
Ramps
D
AM C 34.4 D 36.4 D 36.3
PM B 16.9 B 17.5 B 17.5
Friday PM B 18.2 B 18.9 B 18.8
3 Milliken Avenue
and Baseline Road D
AM D 39.4 D 40.9 D 40.8
PM D 37.7 D 38.4 D 38.4
Friday PM D 36.7 D 37.3 D 37.3
4
Milliken Avenue
and Foothill
Boulevard
D
AM D 37.7 D 39.2 D 39.1
PM D 52.8 E 56.1 E 55.9
Friday PM D 45.7 D 47.6 D 47.4
5 Milliken Avenue
and Arrow Route D
AM E 71.8 E 70.2 E 70.3
PM E 57.8 E 68.1 E 67.2
Friday PM D 47.3 D 47.7 D 47.7
6 Milliken Avenue
and Azusa Court D
AM B 14.3 C 24.7 C 24.1
PM C 15.6 B 12.6 B 12.2
Friday PM C 15.6 A 9.2 A 9
7 Milliken Avenue
and 7th Street D
AM B 16.5 B 17.2 B 17.2
PM B 10.2 B 12.9 B 12.8
Friday PM A 9.8 B 13.1 B 12.8
Page 549
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
38
Intersection LOS
Threshold
Peak
Hour
Opening Year No
Project (2027)
Opening Year Plus
Project All Vehicles
(2027)
Opening Year Plus
Project Shuttles
(2027)
LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s)
8 Milliken Avenue
and 6th Street D
AM C 31.7 C 31.4 C 31.5
PM D 45.4 D 48.1 D 48
Friday PM C 33.9 D 35.2 D 35.2
9 Milliken Avenue
and 4th Street D
AM D 42.8 D 44.6 D 44.5
PM E 63.0 E 65.0 E 64.8
Friday PM D 52.4 D 53.6 D 53.5
10
Milliken Avenue
and I-10 WB
Ramps
E
AM D 44 D 44 D 44
PM E 61.7 E 65.9 E 65.7
Friday PM D 51.2 E 55.0 D 54.7
11 Milliken Avenue
and I-10 EB Ramps E
AM C 27.2 C 27.7 C 27.6
PM C 26.0 C 26.0 C 25.9
Friday PM C 25.9 C 26 C 26
Note: Bolded indicates intersection operations exceed LOS threshold.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
4.4 Future Year (2050) Intersection Operations
The traffic volumes for Future Year (2050) consist of forecasts derived using the difference method from
SBTAM+ model runs to represent 2050 conditions. Figure 14 presents the traffic forecast utilized for
Future Year (2050) No Project Conditions. Figures 15 and 16 present the traffic forecasts utilized for
Future Year (2050) Plus Project Conditions (all vehicles on site and shuttle scenarios, respectively).
Operations analysis Detailed LOS worksheets can be found in Appendix D. Note that Weekday PM and
Friday PM no project forecasts are identical as SBTAM+ is only able to generate forecasts for typical
weekdays. Utilizing the Weekday PM forecasts for the Friday PM scenarios provides a conservative
estimate for Friday traffic volumes.
Page 550
Figure 14Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts Future Year (2050) No Project AM/PM & Friday PM
57
0
(
6
4
0
)
84
0
(
9
0
0
)
44
0
(
2
7
0
)
1,
2
6
0
(
7
6
0
)
430 (330)10 (10)300 (350)
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
1,
1
0
0
(
1
,
2
3
0
)
42
0
(
4
2
0
)
310 (310)10 (10)670 (370)
1,
0
8
0
(
7
7
0
)
48
0
(
3
4
0
)
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
17
0
(
1
9
0
)
70
0
(
1
,
1
1
0
)
90
(
2
7
0
)
350 (340)550 (1,210)120 (140)
46
0
(
1
9
0
)
1,
0
6
0
(
5
8
0
)
25
0
(
1
6
0
)
190 (150)1,140 (670)280 (110)
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
18
0
(
2
8
0
)
48
0
(
1
,
3
8
0
)
14
0
(
4
8
0
)
60 (280)800 (1,960)110 (210)
27
0
(
1
3
0
)
88
0
(
5
4
0
)
25
0
(
1
4
0
)
140 (150)1,750 (1,180)280 (220)
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
20
0
(
3
0
0
)
52
0
(
1
,
8
2
0
)
11
0
(
5
2
0
)
70 (230)580 (1,050)240 (210)
25
0
(
1
5
0
)
1,
0
6
0
(
8
2
0
)
22
0
(
1
5
0
)
200 (220)1,060 (630)320 (210)
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
1,
0
6
0
(
2
,
3
5
0
)
40 (60)
90
(
4
0
)
1,
4
6
0
(
1
,
4
3
0
)
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
10
0
(
1
4
0
)
92
0
(
2
,
0
9
0
)
40
(
3
0
)
150 (230)10 (10)50 (90)
21
0
(
1
8
0
)
1,
2
4
0
(
1
,
2
7
0
)
40
(
1
0
)
10 (50)10 (10)30 (10)
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
38
0
(
3
1
0
)
85
0
(
1
,
7
7
0
)
31
0
(
1
5
0
)
100 (350)390 (680)320 (450)
33
0
(
2
0
0
)
83
0
(
1
,
0
5
0
)
15
0
(
1
6
0
)
110 (230)350 (390)190 (180)
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
35
0
(
3
8
0
)
1,
0
4
0
(
1
,
6
9
0
)
28
0
(
3
5
0
)
180 (300)350 (1,050)290 (440)
12
0
(
1
8
0
)
1,
0
4
0
(
1
,
1
8
0
)
19
0
(
3
2
0
)
270 (240)850 (770)340 (530)
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
53
0
(
5
0
0
)
1,
0
7
0
(
1
,
7
1
0
)
35
0
(
5
2
0
)
740 (990)200 (240)580 (290)
37
0
(
6
5
0
)
1,
1
7
0
(
1
,
4
9
0
)
11
0
(
3
7
0
)
30 (110)240 (420)260 (240)
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
31
0
(
6
0
0
)
1,
3
4
0
(
2
,
2
8
0
)
610 (450)740 (250)
38
0
(
6
5
0
)
1,
6
3
0
(
1
,
3
7
0
)
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
ST
O
P
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
ccc
f
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 551
Figure 15Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts Future Year (2050) Plus Project All Vehicles On Site AM/PM/Friday PM
62
5
(
7
2
1
)
[
7
1
5
]
84
5
(
9
0
6
)
[
9
0
6
]
44
0
(
2
7
0
)
[
2
7
0
]
1,
2
6
5
(
7
6
5
)
[
7
7
0
]
430 (330)[330]10 (10)[10]346 (401)[443]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
1,
1
6
0
(
1
,
3
1
7
)
[
1
,
3
1
1
]
46
3
(
4
8
3
)
[
4
7
8
]
310 (310)[310]10 (10)[10]730 (436)[489]
1,
1
3
1
(
8
2
6
)
[
8
7
3
]
48
0
(
3
4
0
)
[
3
4
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
17
5
(
1
9
6
)
[
1
9
6
]
80
3
(
1
,
2
6
0
)
[
1
,
2
4
9
]
95
(
2
7
6
)
[
2
7
6
]
350 (340)[340]550 (1,210)[1,210]125 (145)[150]
46
0
(
1
9
0
)
[
1
9
0
]
1,
1
7
1
(
7
0
2
)
[
8
0
2
]
25
0
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
6
0
]
190 (150)[150]1,140 (670)[670]285 (115)[120]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
18
9
(
2
9
3
)
[
2
9
2
]
59
3
(
1
,
5
4
2
)
[
1
,
5
3
1
]
17
9
(
5
3
7
)
[
5
3
3
]
60 (280)[280]800 (1,960)[1,960]120 (221)[229]
27
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
3
0
]
1,
0
0
1
(
6
7
2
)
[
7
8
2
]
25
0
(
1
4
0
)
[
1
4
0
]
140 (150)[150]1,750 (1,180)[1,180]323 (267)[304]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
20
0
(
3
0
0
)
[
3
0
0
]
68
1
(
2
,
0
5
2
)
[
2
,
0
3
6
]
12
3
(
5
3
9
)
[
5
3
7
]
70 (230)[230]580 (1,050)[1,050]240 (210)[210]
25
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
1,
2
3
4
(
1
,
0
1
0
)
[
1
,
1
6
5
]
22
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
200 (220)[220]1,060 (630)[630]334 (225)[238]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
26
8
(
2
3
3
)
[
3
8
2
]
1,
0
6
0
(
2
,
3
5
0
)
[
2
,
3
5
0
]
194 (271)[253]178 (318)[303]
27
7
(
2
4
5
)
[
4
1
3
]
1,
4
6
0
(
1
,
4
3
0
)
[
1
,
4
3
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
18
6
(
2
3
4
)
[
3
2
3
]
1,
1
6
8
(
2
,
3
0
3
)
[
2
,
4
5
2
]
40
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
150 (230)[230]10 (10)[10]141 (228)[218]
21
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
1,
3
9
8
(
1
,
5
4
8
)
[
1
,
5
3
3
]
40
(
1
0
)
[
1
0
]
10 (50)[50]10 (10)[10]30 (10)[10]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
38
0
(
3
1
0
)
[
3
1
0
]
1,
1
7
4
(
2
,
0
6
6
)
[
2
,
2
9
4
]
31
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
105 (356)[361]390 (680)[680]320 (450)[450]
33
5
(
2
0
7
)
[
2
0
7
]
1,
0
6
9
(
1
,
4
5
2
)
[
1
,
4
2
8
]
15
5
(
1
6
6
)
[
1
6
6
]
115 (235)[240]350 (390)[390]190 (180)[180]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
35
0
(
3
8
0
)
[
3
8
0
]
1,
2
1
5
(
1
,
8
8
1
)
[
2
,
0
3
4
]
28
0
(
3
5
0
)
[
3
5
0
]
254 (323)[331]350 (1,050)[1,050]290 (440)[440]
13
8
(
2
5
0
)
[
2
4
9
]
1,
1
9
2
(
1
,
4
1
1
)
[
1
,
3
9
5
]
25
9
(
4
2
1
)
[
4
1
4
]
345 (322)[389]850 (770)[770]340 (530)[530]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
53
0
(
5
0
0
)
[
5
0
0
]
1,
1
7
5
(
1
,
8
2
4
)
[
1
,
9
1
5
]
35
0
(
5
2
0
)
[
5
2
0
]
810 (1,067)[1,129]200 (240)[240]580 (290)[290]
43
4
(
7
4
5
)
[
7
3
8
]
1,
2
5
8
(
1
,
6
2
6
)
[
1
,
6
1
7
]
11
0
(
3
7
0
)
[
3
7
0
]
30 (110)[110]240 (420)[420]260 (240)[240]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
31
0
(
6
0
0
)
[
6
0
0
]
1,
3
5
2
(
2
,
2
9
3
)
[
2
,
3
0
1
]
703 (551)[634]740 (250)[250]
46
0
(
7
7
4
)
[
7
6
6
]
1,
6
3
8
(
1
,
3
8
2
)
[
1
,
3
8
1
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 552
Figure 16Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement CountsFuture Year (2050) Plus Project Shuttles Scenario AM/PM/Friday PM
61
8
(
7
0
0
)
[
7
0
5
]
84
4
(
9
0
4
)
[
9
0
5
]
44
0
(
2
7
0
)
[
2
7
0
]
1,
2
6
4
(
7
6
4
)
[
7
6
6
]
430 (330)[330]10 (10)[10]337 (393)[414]
1. Milliken Ave/SR-210 WB
1,
1
5
2
(
1
,
2
9
4
)
[
1
,
3
0
0
]
45
7
(
4
6
6
)
[
4
7
1
]
310 (310)[310]10 (10)[10]718 (425)[453]
1,
1
2
1
(
8
1
7
)
[
8
4
0
]
48
0
(
3
4
0
)
[
3
4
0
]
2. Milliken Ave/SR-210 EB
17
4
(
1
9
4
)
[
1
9
5
]
78
9
(
1
,
2
2
0
)
[
1
,
2
3
1
]
94
(
2
7
4
)
[
2
7
5
]
350 (340)[340]550 (1,210)[1,210]124 (144)[146]
46
0
(
1
9
0
)
[
1
9
0
]
1,
1
4
9
(
6
8
2
)
[
7
3
3
]
25
0
(
1
6
0
)
[
1
6
0
]
190 (150)[150]1,140 (670)[670]284 (114)[116]
3. Milliken Ave/Base Line Rd
18
9
(
2
9
0
)
[
2
9
1
]
57
7
(
1
,
4
9
8
)
[
1
,
5
1
1
]
17
5
(
5
2
3
)
[
5
2
7
]
60 (280)[280]800 (1,960)[1,960]119 (219)[224]
27
0
(
1
3
0
)
[
1
3
0
]
97
7
(
6
5
0
)
[
7
0
5
]
25
0
(
1
4
0
)
[
1
4
0
]
140 (150)[150]1,750 (1,180)[1,180]315 (259)[279]
4. Milliken Ave/Foothill Blvd
20
0
(
3
0
0
)
[
3
0
0
]
66
1
(
1
,
9
9
1
)
[
2
,
0
0
9
]
12
1
(
5
3
4
)
[
5
3
5
]
70 (230)[230]580 (1,050)[1,050]240 (210)[210]
25
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
1,
2
0
1
(
9
7
8
)
[
1
,
0
5
8
]
22
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
200 (220)[220]1,060 (630)[630]331 (223)[229]
5. Milliken Ave/Arrow Route
23
8
(
2
0
7
)
[
2
8
6
]
1,
0
6
0
(
2
,
3
5
0
)
[
2
,
3
5
0
]
172 (204)[224]157 (266)[275]
24
2
(
2
1
1
)
[
2
9
7
]
1,
4
6
0
(
1
,
4
3
0
)
[
1
,
4
3
0
]
6. Milliken Ave/Azusa Ct
16
5
(
2
1
4
)
[
2
5
8
]
1,
1
3
8
(
2
,
2
7
7
)
[
2
,
3
5
6
]
40
(
3
0
)
[
3
0
]
150 (230)[230]10 (10)[10]127 (194)[200]
21
0
(
1
8
0
)
[
1
8
0
]
1,
3
7
7
(
1
,
4
9
6
)
[
1
,
5
0
5
]
40
(
1
0
)
[
1
0
]
10 (50)[50]10 (10)[10]30 (10)[10]
7. Milliken Ave/7th St
38
0
(
3
1
0
)
[
3
1
0
]
1,
1
2
4
(
2
,
0
2
2
)
[
2
,
1
4
0
]
31
0
(
1
5
0
)
[
1
5
0
]
105 (355)[358]390 (680)[680]320 (450)[450]
33
5
(
2
0
5
)
[
2
0
6
]
1,
0
3
5
(
1
,
3
7
1
)
[
1
,
3
8
4
]
15
4
(
1
6
4
)
[
1
6
5
]
114 (234)[236]350 (390)[390]190 (180)[180]
8. Milliken Ave/6th St
SR-210 WB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Foothill Blvd
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Arrow Route
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Azusa Ct
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
7th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
6th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
35
0
(
3
8
0
)
[
3
8
0
]
1,
1
8
1
(
1
,
8
5
2
)
[
1
,
9
3
1
]
28
0
(
3
5
0
)
[
3
5
0
]
253 (321)[326]350 (1,050)[1,050]290 (440)[440]
13
8
(
2
4
7
)
[
2
4
8
]
1,
1
6
8
(
1
,
3
5
9
)
[
1
,
3
6
5
]
24
9
(
3
9
5
)
[
4
0
1
]
330 (309)[343]850 (770)[770]340 (530)[530]
9. Milliken Ave/4th St
4th St
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
53
0
(
5
0
0
)
[
5
0
0
]
1,
1
5
5
(
1
,
8
0
7
)
[
1
,
8
5
4
]
35
0
(
5
2
0
)
[
5
2
0
]
796 (1,055)[1,087]200 (240)[240]580 (290)[290]
42
5
(
7
2
1
)
[
7
2
6
]
1,
2
4
3
(
1
,
5
9
8
)
[
1
,
5
9
9
]
11
0
(
3
7
0
)
[
3
7
0
]
30 (110)[110]240 (420)[420]260 (240)[240]
10. Milliken Ave/I-10 WB/Ontario Mills
I-10 WB Ontario Mills
Mil
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
31
0
(
6
0
0
)
[
6
0
0
]
1,
3
5
1
(
2
,
2
9
1
)
[
2
,
2
9
6
]
684 (536)[578]740 (250)[250]
44
5
(
7
4
9
)
[
7
4
9
]
1,
6
3
8
(
1
,
3
7
9
)
[
1
,
3
8
0
]
11. Milliken Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
SR-210 EB
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
aaccc
cce ad
f
ccead
f
aaccc
aacccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
c
f
aacccfac
c
f
aacccf ac
c
f
accc
af
cccf
acce
ae
acce
ae
aacccfaa
c
c
f
aacccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
c
c
f
aaccce aa
c
c
c
f
aaccccfaa
c
f
aaccccf aa
c
c
f
aaccccaa
f
ccccf
LEGEND
#Study Intersection (Existing)
AM Peak Hour Traffic VolumeXX
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume(XX)
Lane Configurationac
f
Friday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume[XX]Project Site
Page 553
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
42
As shown in Table 12, the following four intersections are projected to operate below their LOS threshold
in Future Year (2050) No Project Conditions:
• Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 6th Street (Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday AM, Weekday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway (Weekday PM)
Under Future Year (2050) Plus Project Conditions, the following six intersections are projected to operate
below their LOS threshold:
• Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road (Weekday AM)
• Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 6th Street (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Friday PM)
• Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway (Weekday PM, Friday PM)
Table 12: Future Year (2050) Intersection Operations
Intersection LOS
Threshold
Peak
Hour
Future Year No
Project (2050)
Future Year Plus
Project All Vehicles
(2050)
Future Year Plus
Project Shuttles
(2050)
LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s)
1
Milliken Avenue
and SR-210 WB
Ramps
D
AM C 27.2 C 29.7 C 29
PM C 22.7 C 28.6 C 25.9
Friday PM - - C 27.1 C 28.6
2
Milliken Avenue
and SR-210 EB
Ramps
D
AM D 36.8 D 42.6 D 40.9
PM C 22.2 C 24.4 C 23.8
Friday PM - - C 26.4 C 24.6
3 Milliken Avenue
and Baseline Road D
AM D 49.4 E 63.4 E 63.4
PM D 49.4 D 50.3 D 49.9
Friday PM - - D 50.1 D 50
4
Milliken Avenue
and Foothill
Boulevard
D
AM D 43 D 45.7 D 45.1
PM D 53.8 E 61.2 E 59.5
Friday PM - - E 64.4 E 61.3
5 Milliken Avenue
and Arrow Route D
AM E 70.1 E 71 E 70.4
PM F 101.6 F 113.5 F 107.3
Friday PM - - F 123.8 F 109.5
Page 554
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
43
Intersection LOS
Threshold
Peak
Hour
Future Year No
Project (2050)
Future Year Plus
Project All Vehicles
(2050)
Future Year Plus
Project Shuttles
(2050)
LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s) LOS Average
Delay (s)
6 Milliken Avenue
and Azusa Court D
AM C 19.9 C 31.4 B 19.7
PM C 20.3 C 24.7 C 20.8
Friday PM - - D 50.6 C 24.4
7 Milliken Avenue
and 7th Street D
AM C 23.8 C 31.7 C 32.7
PM C 21 C 32.6 C 31.8
Friday PM - - D 49.2 C 33.4
8 Milliken Avenue
and 6th Street D
AM D 46.7 D 45.4 D 45.5
PM F 80.5 F 100.7 F 97.6
Friday PM - - F 119.1 F 106.4
9 Milliken Avenue
and 4th Street D
AM E 57.9 E 63.7 E 61.6
PM F 88.6 F 107.7 F 101.6
Friday PM - - F 126.8 F 107.8
10
Milliken Avenue
and I-10 WB
Ramps
E
AM E 72.9 E 76.7 E 73.9
PM F 85.1 F 97.9 F 95.9
Friday PM - - F 106.8 F 99.6
11 Milliken Avenue
and I-10 EB Ramps E
AM E 56.3 E 62.9 D 52.1
PM C 29.3 C 31.9 C 31.7
Friday PM - - C 31.7 C 32
Note: Bolded indicates intersection operations exceed LOS threshold. Friday PM results are not shown for Future Year No Project as
the LOS results are the same as Weekday PM.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Page 555
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
44
4.5 Queueing Analysis
Left- and right-turn queues for critical movements were analyzed at the two site access study
intersections: Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court and Milliken Avenue and 7 th Street. 95th percentile queues
reported in Synchro 12 were compared against available storage capacities. Table 13 shows the queueing
analysis results under Opening Year (2027) and Future Year (2050) Plus Project conditions. Detailed
queueing analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
Table 13: Opening Year (2027) and Future Year (2027) Plus Project 95th Percentile Queuing
Results
Intersection Movement Storage
Length (ft) Peak Hour
Opening
Year (2027)
All Vehicles
on Site
Opening
Year (2027)
Shuttles
Future Year
(2050) All
Vehicles on
Site
Future Year
(2050)
Shuttles
6. Milliken
Ave and
Azusa Ct
NBL
(Inbound) 200
AM 200 198 415 334
PM 106 98 265 237
Friday PM 75 68 519 331
SBR
(Inbound) 180
AM 53 51 97 96
PM <25 <25 91 76
Friday PM <25 <25 138 115
EBL
(Outbound) 270
AM 106 101 151 134
PM 174 164 206 155
Friday PM 130 127 191 170
EBR
(Outbound) 150
AM 43 43 43 41
PM 174 168 55 51
Friday PM 65 65 63 52
7. Milliken
Ave and 7th
Street
NBL
(Inbound) 270
AM 136 109 253 194
PM 74 74 153 155
Friday PM 104 99 323 188
EBL
(Outbound) 210
AM 78 78 144 144
PM 152 152 226 225
Friday PM 122 122 224 226
EBT/R
(Outbound) 230
AM <25 <25 52 50
PM <25 <25 62 59
Friday PM <25 <25 79 59
Note: 95th Percentile queue reported in feet from Synchro 12 using HCM 6tth Methodologies. Storage length based on existing
measurements or assumptions based on available right-of-way. Bold indicates 95th percentile queue exceeds available storage
length.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Page 556
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
45
Queueing analysis does not account for potential impacts with on-site vehicle queueing including parking
structure queueing or passenger pick-up/drop-off queueing. Queues at the Milliken Avenue and Azusa
Court intersection may exceed those reported due to these conditions. Fehr & Peers recommends
additional study to understand the on-site queuing. It is likely that on-site traffic control personnel to
assist with vehicle circulation and minimize queueing during periods of highest demand (e.g. holiday
weekends) may be required.
Improvements are described in the following section to address potential queueing concerns for the
station access intersections of 7th Street and Azusa Court on Milliken Avenue.
Page 557
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
46
5. Roadway Improvements
Fehr & Peers identified potential improvements at deficient intersections to enhance access to and from
the station. Improvements are described below and include changes to signal timing, new signal
equipment, additional turn lanes, and additional through lanes at intersections.
Conceptual design figures for the recommended improvements are provided in Figures 17 through 22.
Additional details on construction constraints and cost estimates are provided in Appendix F.
Intersection 3: Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS E in the Future Year (2050) AM peak hour without
improvements. Changes to signal timing are recommended in the future year to improve intersection
operations to LOS D.
Recommended Improvements
• Optimize signal splits by lengthening the NB/SB through phases
• Update cycle length to 120 seconds
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM - - - - E 63.4 D 46.0
PM - - - - D 50.3 D 41.9
Friday
PM - - - - D 50.1 D 42.0
Shuttles
AM - - - - E 63.4 D 46.4
PM - - - - D 49.9 D 41.5
Friday
PM - - - - D 50.0 D 41.7
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year. No opening year results are presented as this intersection operates acceptably in the
opening year with the Project and no improvements are required.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
These improvements can be completed within the existing right-of-way and with existing traffic signal
hardware.
Page 558
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
47
Intersection 4: Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS E in the Opening Year (2027) PM peak hour and the
Future Year (2050) PM and Friday PM peak hours without improvements. Changes to signal timing and
signal hardware are recommended to improve intersection operations to LOS D.
Recommended Improvements
• Optimize signal splits by lengthening the EBL, EBT, and NBT phases
• Update signal phasing to have the EBL phase lead and the WBL phase lag during the PM and
Friday PM peak hours
• Install NBR right turn overlap. This requires the restriction of the WB U-turn movement.
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM D 39.2 D 38.9 D 45.7 D 45.4
PM E 56.1 D 53.0 E 61.2 D 50.3
Friday
PM D 47.6 D 46.1 E 64.4 D 53.8
Shuttles
AM D 39.1 D 38.8 D 45.1 D 44.9
PM E 55.9 D 52.9 E 59.5 D 50.4
Friday
PM D 47.4 D 46.1 E 61.3 D 52.0
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
These improvements can be completed within the existing right-of-way. Two signal heads will need to be
replaced with 5-head right-turn overlap signal heads, which can be completed with the existing signal
poles and signal controllers.
Cost Estimates
Category Cost
Traffic Signal Modification $100,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $33,000
Contingency (25%) $25,000
Total $158,000
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.
Page 559
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
48
Intersection 5: Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS E or F during all peak hours in the Opening Year (2027)
and Future Year (2050) without improvements. Changes to signal timing, signal hardware, and lane
geometry are recommended to improve intersection operations to LOS D.
Recommended Improvements
• Optimize signal splits by lengthening the NBT, SBT, EBT, and WBT phases
• Increase cycle length to 120 seconds
• Install NBR right turn overlap. This requires the restriction of the WB U-turn movement.
• Add second EBL turn lane
• Add second WBL turn lane
• Add fourth NB through lane from 400’ south of the intersection to 750’ north of the intersection
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM E 70.2 D 40.3 E 71.0 D 43.4
PM E 68.1 D 40.1 F 113.5 D 50.3
Friday
PM D 47.7 D 38.4 F 123.8 D 51.3
Shuttles
AM E 70.3 D 40.3 E 70.4 D 43.3
PM E 67.2 D 40.0 F 107.3 D 49.0
Friday
PM D 47.7 D 38.4 F 109.5 D 49.9
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
Design of curb ramp radii must accommodate the turning movements of large vehicles, such as
trucks, by following City standard drawings
The use of retaining curbs will be required
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including utility manholes, catch basins,
fire hydrants, traffic signal poles, and streetlights.
A total of 4,000 square feet of new right-of-way is required, primarily in the southeast quadrant
Page 560
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
49
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $1,580,000
Traffic Signal Modification $400,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $30,000
Right of Way $650,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $653,400
Contingency (25%) $495,000
Total $3,808,400
Source: Mark Thomas, 2025.
Page 561
MI
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
ARROW ROUTESPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
11'11'12'12'11'12'11'11'4'11'
5'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
6'
7'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
5'
11
'
4'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
INSTALL NEW SIGNALPOLE AND RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
INSTALL NEW SIGNALPOLE AND RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
11'11'5'11'
11'5'
N.T.S.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and Arrow RouteProposed Conditions
Figure 17
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
Page 562
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
51
Intersection 6: Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court
This intersection provides primary access to the station. In addition to installing a new signal, changes to
lane configurations are recommended to minimize queueing.
Recommended Improvements
• Install traffic signal with protected left turn phasing
• Add second NBL turn lane
• Add second EBL turn lane
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM C 24.7 C 26.2 C 31.4 B 17.0
PM B 12.6 A 7.6 C 24.7 B 16.3
Friday
PM A 9.2 A 6.0 D 50.6 B 18.5
Shuttles
AM C 24.1 C 26.1 B 19.7 B 15.5
PM B 12.2 A 7.4 C 20.8 B 13.8
Friday
PM A 9.0 A 5.9 C 24.4 B 15.5
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
Design of curb ramp radii must accommodate the turning movements of large vehicles, such as
buses, by following City standard drawings
The use of retaining curbs will be required
There is a shifting taper at this intersection that conforms before the Metrolink bridge on the
north side of the intersection to protect it in place
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including catch basins and streetlights
A total of 7,700 square feet of new right-of-way is required, primarily in the northwest quadrant
Page 563
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
52
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $1,630,000
Traffic Signal Installation $650,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $30,000
Right of Way $950,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $752,400
Contingency (25%) $570,000
Total $4,582,400
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 564
12'12'11'5'12'
12'12'11'4'12'
5'
12
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
12
'
AZUSA COURTSPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
MIL
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
CONSTRUCT NEWSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTION
INSTALL BICYCLESIGNAL FORSHARED USE PATH
INSTALL BICYCLESIGNAL FORSHARED USE PATH
CONSTRUCT NEW12' SHARED USE PATHFROM 7TH STREETTO STATION
12
'
12'11'11'5'
11'11'11'11'11'5'
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and Azusa CourtProposed Conditions
Figure 18
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
Page 565
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
54
Intersection 7: Milliken Avenue and 7th Street
This intersection provides secondary access to the station. Changes to signal hardware and lane
configurations are recommended to minimize queueing.
Recommended Improvements
• Install flashing yellow arrow/protected-permissive left turn phasing for EBL and WBL movements
• Add second NBL turn lane
• Widen WB 7th Stret to two lanes between Milliken Avenue and Anaheim Place. Second WB Lane
turns right to Anaheim Place.
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM B 17.2 B 12.4 C 31.7 B 17.6
PM B 12.9 B 10.4 C 32.6 C 28.3
Friday
PM B 13.1 B 10.8 D 49.2 C 33.8
Shuttles
AM B 17.2 B 12.4 C 32.7 B 16.4
PM B 12.8 B 10.3 C 31.8 C 27.9
Friday
PM B 12.8 B 10.6 C 33.4 C 28.8
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
Design of curb ramp radii must accommodate the turning movements of large vehicles, such as
buses, by following City standard drawings
The use of retaining curbs will be required
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including streetlights, traffic signal
control cabinets, fire hydrants, and an electric vault
A total of 4,100 square feet of new right-of-way is required, primarily in the northwest and
northeast quadrants
Page 566
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
55
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $1,380,000
Traffic Signal Modification $650,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $15,000
Right of Way $130,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $669,900
Contingency (25%) $507,500
Total $3,352,400
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 567
12'11'11'11'10'11'
11'12'12'11'5'10'
MI
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
7TH STREETSPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
CONSTRUCT NEW12' SHARED USE PATHFROM 7TH STREETTO STATION
CONVERT EXISTING10' SIDEWALK TOSHARED USE PATH
RECONSTRUCT CURBRAMPS TO PROVIDEDIRECTIONAL CURBRAMPS
INSTALL EB/WB FLASHING YELLOWARROW SIGNAL HEADS ANDMODIFY SIGNAL AS SHOWN
6'
20
'
11
'
19
'
14
'
11
'
1
1
'
12
'
11' 11'6'
11'11'11'11'5'
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and 7th StreetProposed Conditions
Figure 19
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
Page 568
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
57
Intersection 8: Milliken Avenue and 6th Street
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS F in the Future Year (2050) PM and Friday PM peak hours
without improvements. Changes to signal hardware and lane geometry are recommended in the future
year to improve intersection operations to LOS D.
Recommended Improvements
• Install EBR right turn overlap. This requires restriction of the NB U-turn movement.
• Add fourth NB through lane from 500’ south of the intersection to 750’ north of the intersection
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM - - - - D 45.4 D 37.2
PM - - - - F 100.7 D 48.2
Friday
PM - - - - F 119.1 D 50.1
Shuttles
AM - - - - D 45.5 D 37.3
PM - - - - F 97.6 D 46.8
Friday
PM - - - - F 106.4 D 47.7
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year. No opening year results are presented as this intersection operates acceptably in the
opening year with the Project and no improvements are required.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
Design of curb ramp radii must accommodate the turning movements of large vehicles, such as
trucks, by following City standard drawings
The use of retaining curbs will be required
Widening to the south of the intersection may cause potential building setback and off-street
parking issues, which will be evaluated during the final design process
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including streetlights, traffic signal
control cabinets, fire hydrants, utility access points, and storm drains
A total of 1,900 square feet of new right-of-way is required, primarily in the southeast quadrant
Page 569
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
58
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $1,130,000
Traffic Signal Modification $300,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $75,000
Right of Way $290,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $471,900
Contingency (25%) $357,500
Total $2,624,400
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 570
MI
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
6TH STSPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
11'5'11'11'
11'11'11'5'11'
12
'
1
2
'
12
'
11
'
1
2
'
11
'
1
4
'
11
'
12
'
11
'
1
1
'
11
'
11' 11'11'12'
11'11'11'11'5'
11
'
9'
6'
5'
12
'
6'
5'
11'11'11'5'
7'
7'
11' 11'
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
INSTALL NEW SIGNALPOLE AND RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
INSTALL RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
CONVERT EXISTING 10'SIDEWALK TO SHAREDUSE PATH
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and 6th StreetProposed Conditions
Figure 20
Page 571
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
60
Intersection 9: Milliken Avenue and 4th Street
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS E in the Opening Year (2027) PM Peak Hour and LOS E or
F in the Future Year (2050) AM, PM, and Friday PM peak hours without improvements. Changes to signal
phasing, signal hardware, and lane geometry are recommended to improve intersection operations to the
maximum extent practicable.
With improvements, the intersection is still forecasted to operate at LOS E in the Future Year (2050) PM
and Friday PM Peak Hours. Additional study is recommended at this intersection, including considering
alternative intersection configurations.
Recommended Improvements
• Optimize signal splits by lengthening the NBT, SBT, EBT, and WBT phases
• Increase cycle length to 150 seconds
• Install EBR right turn overlap. This requires restriction of the NB U-turn movement
• Add third WBL turn lane
• Add third SBL turn lane
• Add one SBR turn lane
• Add one EBR turn lane
• Add fourth WB through lane from 430’ east of the intersection to Empire Court (1,200’ west of the
intersection)
• Convert existing EBR trap-right turn lane to fourth EB through lane. Widen EB receiving lanes to
four lanes between Milliken Avenue and Gurnee Avenue (730’ east of the intersection)
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM D 44.6 D 49.7 E 63.7 D 50.8
PM E 65.0 D 53.4 F 107.7 E 73.8
Friday
PM D 53.6 D 54.1 F 126.8 E 78.2
Shuttles
AM D 44.5 D 49.7 E 61.6 D 52.7
PM E 64.8 D 53.3 F 101.6 E 71.9
Friday
PM D 53.5 D 54.1 F 107.8 E 76.3
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Page 572
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
61
Constraints
Design of curb ramp radii must accommodate the turning movements of large vehicles, such as
trucks, by following City standard drawings
Driveway reconfigurations shall be designed in accordance with City standards
The proposed design requires an offset of the eastbound through lanes through the intersection.
The design of this lateral shift should be reviewed during the final design process and conform to
MUTCD standards. These standards include:
o A maximum offset gap of 6-feet through the intersection
o A minimum shifting taper of 1:50
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including overhead electric transmission
lines, streetlights, traffic signal control cabinets, fire hydrants, utility access points, and storm
drains
A total of 15,100 square feet of new right-of-way is required, primarily in the northwest and
southeast quadrants
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $2,300,000
Traffic Signal Modification $700,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $125,000
Right of Way $2,040,000
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $990,000
Contingency (25%) $750,000
Total $6,905,000
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 573
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLEINSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
INSTALL NEW SIGNALPOLE AND RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEW SIGNALPOLE AND RIGHT TURNOVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLEINSTALL NEWSIGNAL POLE
11'5'11'11'11'11'11'10'10' 4'11'11'11'11'5'
12
'
5'
11
'
11
'
10
'
10
'
4'
12
'
14'12'11'11'11'11'12'11'11'11'18'
12
'
11
'
11
'
10
'
11
'
5
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
12
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
RECONSTRUCTRAMP
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and Fourth StreetProposed Conditions (Milliken Avenue)
Figure 21a
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
EXISTING CURB LINE
Page 574
INSTALL NEW
SIGNAL POLEINSTALL NEW
SIGNAL POLE
INSTALL NEW SIGNAL
POLE AND RIGHT TURN
OVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEW SIGNAL
POLE AND RIGHT TURN
OVERLAP SIGNAL HEAD
INSTALL NEW
SIGNAL POLEINSTALL NEW
SIGNAL POLE
11'5'11'11'11'11'11'10'10' 4'11'11'11'11'5'
12
'
5'
11
'
11
'
10
'
10
'
4'
12
'
14'12'11'11'11'11'12'11'11'11'18'
12
'
11
'
11
'
10
'
11
'
5'
11
'
11
'
11
'
12
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
RELOCATE HIGH-VOLTAGE
TRANSMISSION LINE AND
STREET LIGHTS
RECONSTRUCT
RAMP
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station Access
Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street
Proposed Conditions (Fourth Street)
Figure 21b
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL
DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
EXISTING CURB LINE
Page 575
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
64
Intersection 10: Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS F in the Future Year (2050) PM and Friday PM peak hours
without improvements. Changes to signal timing and lane geometry are recommended to improve
intersection operations to LOS E.
Recommended Improvements
• Optimize signal splits by lengthening the NBL, NBT, and SBT phases
• Add third EBL turn lane
Operational Analysis
Scenario Peak
Hour
OY Plus Project No
Improvements
OY Plus Project with
Improvements
FY Plus Project No
Improvements
FY Plus Project with
Improvements
LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s)
All Vehicles
on Site
AM D 44.0 D 42.2 E 76.7 E 72.1
PM E 65.9 D 46.9 F 97.9 E 72.6
Friday
PM E 55.0 D 45.7 F 106.8 E 76.0
Shuttles
AM D 44.0 D 42.1 E 73.9 E 72.1
PM E 65.7 D 46.8 F 95.9 E 70.7
Friday
PM D 54.7 D 45.7 F 99.6 E 71.3
Notes: OY: Opening Year; FY: Future Year
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Constraints
The design of the new radius of the westbound off-ramp must comply with the Caltrans Highway
Design Manual, which will be confirmed during the final design phase
Utility and roadside equipment will need to be relocated including drainage inlets, traffic signal
poles, and traffic signs
Improvements can be completed within the existing right-of-way
Page 576
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
65
Civil Cost Estimates (2024 Dollars)
Category Cost
Roadway Construction Improvements $580,000
Traffic Signal Modification $250,000
Utility Relocations and Service Costs $0
Right of Way $0
PS&E/Design, Construction Management, Soft Costs (33%) $273,900
Contingency (25%) $207,500
Total $1,311,400
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 577
MI
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
I-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS
16'12'12'12'12'12'11'12'12'22'
12
'
12
'
13
'
11
'
12
'
15
'
11
'
16
'
13'11'11'12'12'11'12'12'12'12'14'
8'
13
'
12
'
12
'
12
'
12
'
12
'
12
'
14'4'
7'
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station AccessMilliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills ParkwayProposed Conditions
Figure 22
EXISTING CURB
PROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
EXISTING SIGNAL
PROPOSAL SIGNAL
Page 578
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
67
6. Bicycle and Pedestrian Access
This section summarizes bicycle and pedestrian access to and from the station area including existing and
planned bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Recommendations to improve active transportation access
are also provided.
6.1 Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities
According to the Community Mobility chapter of Plan RC (2021), the City’s existing bicycle network is
comprised of 34.5 miles of bike paths/trails (Class I), 31.75 miles of bike lanes (Class II), and 34.25 miles of
bike routes (Class III). California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) also permits
separated bikeways (Class IV), which are currently not part of the City’s bicycle network. These facilities are
described below.
Class I Bikeways (Bike Paths)
Class I bicycle facilities are bicycle trails or paths that are off-street and separated from automobiles. They
are a minimum of eight feet in width for two-way travel and include bike lane signage and designated
street crossings where needed. A Class I Bike Path may parallel a roadway (within the parkway) or may be
a separate right-of-way that meanders through a neighborhood or along a flood control channel or utility
right-of-way.
Class II Bikeways (Bike Lanes)
Class II bicycle facilities are striped lanes that provide bike travel and can be either located next to a curb
or parking lane. If located next to a curb, a minimum width of five feet is recommended. However, a bike
lane adjacent to a parking lane can be four feet in width. Bike lanes are exclusively for the use of bicycles
and include bike lane signage, special lane lines, and pavement markings.
Page 579
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
68
Class III Bikeways (Bike Routes)
Class III Bikeways are streets providing for shared use by motor vehicles and bicyclists. While bicyclists
have no exclusive use or priority, signage by the side of the street and sometimes stenciled on the
roadway surface alerts motorists to bicyclists sharing the roadway space and denotes that the street is an
official bike route.
Class IV Bikeways (Separated Bikeways)
Class IV bicycle facilities, sometimes called cycle tracks or separated bikeways, provide a right-of-way
designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to a roadway and are protected from vehicular traffic via
separations (e.g., grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, on-street parking). California
Assembly Bill 1193 (AB 1193) legalized and established design standards for Class IV bikeways in 2015.
Page 580
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
69
Within the Project area, multiple roadway facilities currently have Class II bike lanes:
• Milliken Avenue
• Baseline Road
• Foothill Boulevard
• Arrow Route
• 6th Street
• 4th Street (Westbound Only)
PlanRC, the City’s General Plan, identifies several bicycle priority corridors near the station area including
6th Street, Jersey Boulevard, The Resort Parkway, Spruce Avenue/Red Oak Street, and the Day Creek
Channel. Key projects identified in the ActiveRC implementation plan that are near the station area
include:
• Spruce Avenue and Red Oak Street Ped/Bike Enhancements (Foothill Boulevard to Jersey
Boulevard)
• 6th Street Cycle Track (Haven Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue)
Figure 23 shows the existing and proposed bicycle facilities adjacent to the station area.
Page 581
Page 582
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
71
6.2 Existing and Planned Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, signalized crossings, and multi-use pathways. Sidewalks
are currently provided along both sides of Milliken Avenue and most other roadways throughout the
study area.
As part of the Resort North Specific Plan, pedestrian improvements are proposed to the southwest of the
station area including a pedestrian corridor between 6th Street and the Ranco Cucamonga station. A
pedestrian undercrossing is proposed just east of the 6 th Street and The Resort Parkway intersection.
6.3 Recommended Improvements
Milliken Avenue Shared Use Path
To improve connectivity between the 6th Street separated bikeway and the station area, a Class I shared
use path along the western side of Milliken Avenue is recommended between 6th Street and Azusa Court.
This will require the reconstruction and widening of the existing sidewalk from 5 to 12 feet between Azusa
Court and 7th Street. South of 7th Street, the existing sidewalk is 10 feet wide, which is consistent with the
minimum guidelines for a shared use path.2
Additional signage and pavement markings along the shared use path and at intersections are
recommended to improve awareness of bicyclists and pedestrians and minimize pedestrian-bicyclist
conflicts on the shared use path.
Bicycle Conflict Markings and High Visibility Crosswalks
Consistent with City standards, bicycle conflict markings are recommended for conflict areas with right
turning vehicles, driveways, and other areas where bicycle and vehicle paths of travel cross. Conceptual
design figures provided in Section 5 indicate locations at study intersections where conflict markings are
recommended.
High visibility crosswalk markings are recommended for crosswalks with higher levels of pedestrian
activity. This includes the crosswalks for the proposed shared use path along Milliken Avenue and at all
crosswalks along Azusa Court.
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) is a pedestrian safety countermeasure that gives pedestrians a head start
before vehicles, making them more visible to turning drivers. LPI operates by providing the “Walk” signal
in advance of the vehicle green signal (typically three to seven seconds before).
LPI is recommended for all signalized intersections in the study area and can be implemented when other
signal timing parameters are being updated.
2 Caltrans Highway Design Manual Section 1003.1
Page 583
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
72
On-Site Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation
Project on-site circulation improvements should accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists,
recognizing additional activity will take place in the station area. Fehr & Peers recommends extending the
Milliken Avenue multi-use path along the north side of Azusa Court to provide direct access to the station
area while minimizing right-of-way impacts and reducing the need for an unsignalized pedestrian
crossing on Azusa Court. Pedestrian crossings along Azusa Court should be well marked and incorporate
pedestrian prioritization measures including raised crosswalks and rectangular rapid flashing beacons
(RRFBs).
The City should work with Brightline West during the station design process to ensure pedestrian and
bicycle access is well designed. Pedestrian movements should be separated from vehicle movements and
passenger pick-up/drop-off to the maximum extent practicable. Pedestrian routes between the bus loop
and train station should be prioritized. Additional bike parking, including bike lockers, can be installed to
support multi-modal access.
Page 584
12'12'11'5'12'
12'12'11'4'12'
5'
12
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
12
'
12'10'11'
11'12'12'11'5'10'
AZUSA COURTSPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
MILL
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
SPEE
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
MI
L
L
I
K
E
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
SP
E
E
D
L
I
M
I
T
:
5
0
M
P
H
7TH STREETSPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
INSTALL LEADINGPEDESTRIAN INTERVAL (LPI)
INSTALL BICYCLESIGNAL FORSHARED USE PATH
INSTALL BICYCLESIGNAL FORSHARED USE PATH
CONSTRUCT NEW12' SHARED USE PATHFROM 7TH STREETTO STATION
CONSTRUCT NEW12' SHARED USE PATHFROM 7TH STREETTO STATION
CONVERT EXISTING10' SIDEWALK TOSHARED USE PATH
RECONSTRUCT CURBRAMPS TO PROVIDEDIRECTIONAL CURBRAMPS
INSTALL LEADINGPEDESTRIAN INTERVAL (LPI)
12
'
12'11'11'5'
11'11'11'11'11'5'
20
'
11
'
19
'
14
'
11
'
1
1
'
12
'
11'11'6'
11'11'11'11'5'
11'11'12'6'
1":40'
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONALDETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
Rancho Cucamonga HSR Station AccessBicycle and Pedestrian ImprovementsMilliken Avenue: Azusa Court to 7th Street
Figure 24
EXISTING CURBPROPOSED CURB (RECONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING SIGNALPROPOSAL SIGNAL
REMOVE EXISTING CURB
Page 585
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
74
7. Public Transportation Access
This section details existing and proposed public transit services to and from the Rancho Cucamonga
station. Transit improvements are also recommended along Milliken Avenue to facilitate shuttle trips and
improve transit travel time reliability.
7.1 Existing and Planned Transit Services
Existing and planned transit services are operated by multiple transit agencies and are described below.
Figure 24 shows the existing and planned transit services serving the station.
7.1.1 Omnitrans
OmniTrans Transit Agency provides local transit service throughout San Bernardino County, including the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. Bus transit services are available in the city through fixed-route and demand-
response services. Bus routes that run through the city connect to the neighboring cities of Fontana,
Upland, Ontario, Montclair, Eastvale and Chino. Within Rancho Cucamonga, bus routes run on major
roadways, including Fourth Street, Milliken Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard.
Existing Services
The following transit routes serve the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink station:
Route 82 provides transit service between Victoria Gardens and the Fontana Metrolink Transit Center via
Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, Jurupa Avenue, Sierra Avenue, Citrus Avenue, and Sierra Lakes
Parkway. The route operates approximately 60 minutes on weekdays between 4:30 AM and 10:30 PM and
every 65 minutes on weekends between 7 AM and 8 PM.
Route 380 provides a direct connection between the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink station and Ontario
International Airport via 6th Street and Haven Avenue. Service runs every 35-60 minutes between 4:30 AM
and 11:30 PM on weekdays and 7:30 AM to 9:30 PM on weekends.
West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit
The West Valley Connector is a planned bus rapid transit (BRT) service between the Pomona Regional
Transit Center and Victoria Gardens via Holt Boulevard, Inland Empire Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and
Foothill Boulevard. The service will provide direct connections to the cities of Pomona, Montclair, and
Ontario.
Service is expected to operate every 10 minutes during the peak commute period and every 15 minutes
off-peak. Transit improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga include enhanced stations and
transit signal priority. The West Valley Connector BRT will stop at Rancho Cucamonga station.
Page 586
Page 587
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
76
7.1.2 Metrolink
Metrolink is the regional commuter rail provider for the Southern California region, operated by the
Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA).
Existing Services
The Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink station is served by the Metrolink San Bernardino Line, which connects
Downtown Los Angeles and Los Angeles Union Station with Downtown San Bernardino. The route also
serves the cities of El Monte, Baldwin Park, Covina, Pomona, Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Fontana, and
Rialto.
Service on the Metrolink San Bernardino Line operates every 30-60 minutes on weekdays from 4:00 AM to
10:00 PM and every 60-180 minutes on weekends from 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM.
Planned Services
Additional service expansion is proposed along the Metrolink San Bernardino Line as part of the Southern
California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) Program. Current improvements include additional track
sidings and at-grade crossing improvements just west of the Rancho Cucamonga station. The SCORE
program includes plans for at least two trains per hour per direction on the San Bernardino line.
7.1.3 Other Transportation Services
ONT Connector
The ONT Connector is an underground personal rapid transit connection proposed between the Rancho
Cucamonga Metrolink Station and Ontario International Airport (ONT). The corridor will be operated by
Omnitrans and feature autonomous, zero-emission vehicles traveling on an “on-demand” basis travelling
in an underground tunnel. The proposed station at the Rancho Cucamonga station will be located in the
northwest corner of the station area.
The project is currently undergoing the environmental review process. Funding for design and
construction has not yet been identified.
Page 588
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
77
7.2 Recommended Improvements
Queue Jumps
Queue jump lanes allow buses to bypass
vehicle queues at intersections. These can be
implemented at locations with right turn
pockets and when right turn volumes and
queues are low. Queue jumps are combined
with active signal priority that provides a
leading bus interval, allowing buses to get a
head start before vehicles. Queue jumps can be
provided for Omnitrans buses and any shuttles
serving the station.
Due to the high number of transit vehicles
serving the station area, including potential shuttles for passengers that park off-site, queue jumps are
recommended in the study area. Queue jumps are recommended at intersections with right turn volumes
less than 400 vehicles per hour and when 95th percentile right turn queues do not exceed 200 feet. Table
15 lists the intersections where queue jumps can be considered.
Table 15: Queue Jump Feasibility Analysis
Intersection Movement Highest FY Peak
Right Turn Volume
Longest FY Right
Turn Queue (ft) Recommended
4. Milliken Avenue and Foothill
Boulevard
NB 537 476’ No
SB 270 194’ Yes
5. Milliken Avenue and Arrow
Route
NB 539 425’ No
SB 250 149’ Yes
8. Milliken Avenue and 6th Street NB 310 79’ Yes
SB 335 172’ Yes
9. Milliken Avenue and 4th Street NB 350 241’ No
SB 250 141’ Yes
Note: FY = Future Year (2050). Queue jumps would utilize right turn pockets.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
Active Transit Signal Priority
Transit Signal Priority (TSP) modifies traffic signal timing when transit vehicles are present to improve
transit reliability and travel time. TSP is effective at intersections with long queues where transit may be
frequently impacted by signal operations. TSP utilizes onboard and wayside technology to inform the
traffic signal controller of an approaching bus.
Queue Jump Example (Source: NACTO)
Page 589
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
78
Two TSP treatments are recommended for the corridor:
Green Extension: This treatment provides extra time for a detected transit vehicle to clear an intersection.
It is recommended for intersections where buses are not turning, and queue jump lanes are not provided.
Phase Reservicing: This treatment provides the same phase twice in a signal cycle to expedite the
movement of transit vehicles. Transit phase reservice is recommended for the NBL movement at the
Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court intersection.
On-Site Transit Circulation
The existing Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink station bus loop is located to the west of the proposed
parking structure and provides a total of five bus bays. The proposed station improvements maintain the
bus loop and provide direct pedestrian access between the bus loop and the train station.
As part of the station area improvements, Fehr & Peers recommends installation of additional signage
and pavement markings to prevent non-public transit vehicles from using the bus loop for pick-up and
drop-off. To provide additional capacity for private vehicle passenger pick-up and drop-off, off-site
parking shuttles can also utilize the bus loop for the loading and unloading of passengers.
Page 590
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
79
8. Implementation and Next Steps
This section outlines implementation of the recommended improvements including next steps and
phasing.
8.1 Next Steps
The City of Rancho Cucamonga should program these improvements in the City’s Capital Improvement
Plan. Improvements will require environmental review, engineering design, utility coordination, and right-
of-way acquisition prior to construction. Appendix F provides additional details on constraints and next
steps for improvements at each intersection.
The proposed roadway improvements, shared use path, and transit improvements are intended to
improve intersection traffic operations and multimodal access and are not expected to provide additional
through roadway capacity. Therefore, Fehr & Peers does not anticipate that the improvements would
generate induced VMT that would require a full environmental impact report. During the environmental
entitlement process, the City should confirm and document the nature of the improvements and that they
would not generate induced VMT that could cause a significant transportation impact.
Additional resource areas including air quality and noise should be reviewed to determine the appropriate
environmental clearance required.
8.2 Phasing
Phase 1: Opening Year Improvements
Initial improvements shown in Table 16 are recommended at the two site access intersections and the
two intersections to the north of the station area. These improvements should be completed prior to the
completion of the Brightline West project as part of the first package of construction.
Table 16: Opening Year (2027) Improvements Cost Estimates
Project 2024 Cost ($1,000s)
Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court Signalized Intersection $4,582,400
Milliken Avenue and 7th Street Intersection Improvements $3,352,400
Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Intersection Improvements $158,000
Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route Intersection Improvements $3,808,400
Total Phase 1 $11,901,200
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 591
Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Station Access Study
July 2025
80
Phase 2: Future Year Improvements
Improvements at the remaining intersections are recommended to be implemented in a second phase
following the opening of the Brightline West project. 2024 cost estimates for Phase 2 are provided in
Table 17.
Table 17: Future Year (2050) Improvements Cost Estimates
Project 2024 Cost ($1,000s)
Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road Intersection Improvements -
Milliken Avenue and 6th Street Intersection Improvements $2,624,400
Milliken Avenue and 4th Street Intersection Improvements $6,905,000
Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway Intersection Improvements $1,311,400
Total Phase 2 $10,840,800
Source: Mark Thomas, 2024.
Page 592
RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH
SPEED RAIL STATION ACCESS
STUDY
BACKGROUND
•City coordination with Brightline
West (BLW) and San Bernadino
County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA)
STUDY PARAMATERS
•Trip generation and distribution of
new trips
•Impacts to major & critical minor
intersections along Milliken Ave
•Determination of additional capacity
needs
•Conceptual plans and costs estimate
STUDY FINDINGS
•Study found impacts to eight
intersections
•Six intersections within City of Rancho
Cucamonga
•One intersection shared with City of
Ontario
•One intersection is within Caltrans
jurisdiction
•Estimated improvements - $23M,
including intersections outside the
city’s jurisdiction
SUGGESTED PROJECT PHASES
•Phase 1 Improvements - $11,901,200
•Phase 2 Improvements - $10,840,800
Project Cost
Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court Signalized Intersection $4,582,400
Milliken Avenue and 7th Street Intersection Improvements $3,352,400
Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Intersection Improvements $158,000
Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route Intersection Improvements $3,808,400
Total Phase 1 $11,901,200
Project Cost
Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road Intersection Improvements -
Milliken Avenue and 6th Street Intersection Improvements $2,624,400
Milliken Avenue and 4th Street Intersection Improvements $6,905,000
Milliken Avenue and I-10 WB/Ontario Mills Parkway Intersection
Improvements
$1,311,400
Total Phase 2 $10,840,800
RECOMMENDATION
•Staff recommends that City Council receive and file
the Rancho Cucamonga High Speed Rail Access
Study; and
•Direct staff to pursue options to implement the
improvements through the use of Measure I or
other grant opportunities.
Questions?
DATE:September 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager
Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager - Community Development
Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
Zack Neighbors, Building & Safety Services Director
SUBJECT:Quarterly Development Update - Second Quarter 2025. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation from staff on development-related
activities for the second quarter of 2025 (April through June).
BACKGROUND:
In 2023 staff began providing Quarterly Development Updates (QDU) to the City Council. The
purpose of these reports is to regularly inform the Council and the community about development-
related activities. While annual reports such as the General Plan progress report, offer some
insights into development activities (including the number of permits issued and housing units
constructed), quarterly updates effectively deliver information on development activities over a
shorter time frame. These updates also allow staff to include additional information, such as
economic development activities and customer service data, which are not typically covered in
annual reports but are essential to the City’s community development efforts.
ANALYSIS:
The QDU presented to the City Council will include summaries of activities from the Building &
Safety, Planning, and Economic Development departments. This includes, but is not limited to,
details on entitlement approvals by use type, updates on key development projects, and
reporting on building permit and plan check activities.
Staff's formal presentation to the City Council will provide further details on development-related
activities, and staff will continue to present this information to Council on a quarterly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the Council’s following core values:
1. Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all
2. Relentless pursuit of improvement
3. Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 593
September 3, 2025
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
2025 – Q2
QUARTERLY DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING
Activity Summary – Q2 PLANNING
New
Applications
Submitted
4
4 Counter
Visits
368
Phone Calls
576
Major Projects
in Review
37 Planning
Commission
Meetings
3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Activity Summary – Q2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Conferences
Attended
4
Meetings/Events
Attended
(Resource Partners)
4
Social Media Impressions
807,890
SBDC Meetings
45
Home Rehab
Projects
Completed
3
Happy
Customers
93%
Visitor Activity ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Visitors
4.1 M
Visits
17 M 10-30 mi
26.2% Visitors Traveled
Average Stay
160 Min Victoria
Gardens
Visitor’s Top Places
Travel and Tourism ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Overnight Trips
108K
Visit Nights
310K
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BUILDING & SAFETY
17 ADU’s Finalized
1,301 Building Permits Issued
1,659 New Plan Check Submittals
22 New Units Finalized
23 New Construction Permits Finalized
BUILDING &
SAFETY
SUMMARY
2025 - Quarter 2
499 Counter Visits
4,326 Phone Calls
2,800 Texting Contacts
3,203 Inspections
BUILDING ACTIVITY
New Construction
Alexan Victoria Gardens
BUILDING ACTIVITY
Residential
Haven and Arrow
248 Units
Sycamore Heights
100 Townhomes
BUILDING ACTIVITY
Occupancy
Sourdough & Co
6331 Haven Ave Ste 2
Alta Merita
12915 Foothill Blvd
Quakes Stadium
8408 Rochester Ave
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THE END