The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-08-27 - Agenda Packet Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS August 27, 2025 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 PM A. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Chairman Morales Vice Chairman Boling Commissioner Dopp Commissioner Daniels Commissioner Diaz B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning/Historic Commission (“Planning Commission”) on any Consent Calendar item or any item not listed on the agenda that is within the Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Planning Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the agenda, but may set the matter for discussion during a subsequent meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 13, 2025. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS D1. Tentative Parcel Map - EGL - A request for the subdivision of an existing 21,000 square foot parcel into two new parcels within the Medium Residential (M) zone and the Hillside Overlay, located at 7444 Avila Avenue. This project qualifies for an exemption from CEQA review under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b) (3), as it will not result in a significant or direct impact upon the environment. APN: 0208-921-09 (SUBTPM20986). D2. Tentative Parcel Map – Hongjian Tan – A request for the subdivision of an existing 21,163 square foot parcel into two new parcels within the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) zone, located at 13261 Victoria Street. This project qualifies for a Class 15 Categorical Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines 15315 as a Minor Land Division. APN: 0227-121-45 (SUBTPM21001). E. COMMISSION BUSINESS E1. Discussion of State Density Bonus Law. (Verbal Only) F. DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS G. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS H. ADJOURNMENT TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 3 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Communications.” As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeals filed must be in writing with the City Clerk’s Office, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by an appeal fee pursuant to the most adopted fee schedule for all decisions for the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted Seventy-Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 1 of 6 2 8 3 1 Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda August 13, 2025 Draft Minutes Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on August 13, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz. Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner; Jared Knight, Assistant Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant. B. Public Communications Chairman Morales opened the public communications. Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of July 23, 2025. Vice Chairman Boling noted a correction in Section H – Adjournment, indicating that Commissioner Diaz should be replaced with Vice Chairman Boling, as Commissioner Diaz was absent. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling. Motion carried 3-2 with Commissioners Daniels and Diaz abstaining. Motion passes as amended. D. Public Hearings D1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION – St. Elias Orthodox Church – A request to modify existing Conditional Use Permit 85-02 to allow for the use of an approved 7,900 square foot fellowship hall addition at an existing 15,710 square foot church on a 2.73-acre lot located within the Very Low (VL) Residential zone and Hillside and Equestrian Overlays, located at 5474 Haven Avenue; APN: 1074-281-20. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (DRC2025-00135). Assistant Planner Serafin provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Page 3 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 2 of 6 2 8 3 1 Commissioner Daniels asked staff whether an analysis had been conducted regarding a potential increase in traffic. Assistant Planner Serafin responded that no traffic analysis was conducted because the project is categorically exempt from environmental review and no further analysis was required. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Applicant Alberre, St. Elias Church Board Member, spoke about their vision for the church and thanked Planner Serafin for all her help on the project. The following persons commented on the project: Kruger Kriston, Lorrie Atilano and Gastave Hue. Their concerns/comments included: Traffic Block view of the Foothills Children’s safety related to traffic Parking overflow onto the street Requested parking signage indicating church parking is not permitted on the street For the record, comments cards were received during the meeting from the following individuals expressing support for the project: Mazen Saliba, Abdo Alberre, Autwan Kasih, Ibrahim Zakour, Basel Salhab, Fadel Samaan, Johnny Abdalnour, Hussam Dahi, Bassem Diab, Chassan Elmalih, Frank Salhab and Jamal Dahi. Applicant Alberre responded to the comments from the public and indicated they will work with the community members to minimize any impact to the neighborhood. Commissioner Dopp asked the applicant about when their busiest services would be that might result in overflow services. Applicant Alberre replied that it is during the major Holidays such as, Christmas, Easter, and Good Friday. Commissioner Dopp questioned if their main sanctuary is not used for other events, and it is only for religious services. Applicant Alberre confirmed. Commissioner Diaz mentioned that Hillside Church has a parking agreement with Chaffey College for overflow parking and asked whether they had considered a similar arrangement. Applicant Alberre replied that they will look into it if they see issues with overflow parking. Chairman Morales asked whether the number of parishioners would remain the same, with no additional traffic to come into the neighborhood. Applicant Alberre confirmed. Chairman Morales asked if someone from the Church could remind the parishioners to be cautious about overflow parking in the neighborhood, to be respectful, and to consider the safety of children. Applicant Alberre confirmed. Page 4 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 3 of 6 2 8 3 1 Chairman Morales asked whether neighbors could contact the church office if they had any issues or concerns. Applicant Alberre confirmed. Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Commissioner Dopp encouraged the applicant to proactively engage with the community, especially during the holidays, and to conduct outreach prior to any significant events. Commissioner Daniels expressed traffic concerns but from what has been explained it does not seem that it will be a big issue. He mentioned for the neighbors if parking in the street becomes an issue, to first contact the church. If that does not work, the city has certain things they can do to restrict parking on the street during certain days. Vice Chairman Boling stated that, regarding events, he encouraged the applicant to coordinate with staff to identify any anticipated events that may require a Temporary Use Permit. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution 2025-024 approving Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2025-00135. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Tamara Tangherlini - A request to operate a large indoor fitness and sports facility in an existing 17,500 square foot warehouse space within the Neo- Industrial (NI) Zone, located at 9201 Charles Smith Avenue; APN: 0229-284-23. This project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (DRC2025-00101). Assistant Planner Knight provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Diaz asked staff how the Path of Travel was determined, noting that it seemed likely attendees would park at 9208 Charles Smith Avenue and would not use the designated route. Assistant Planner Knight responded the applicant will be providing detailed instructions on the Path of Travel to customers. He said any illegal crossing will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Commissioner Daniels asked if the parking will be on the south side of the building. Assistant Planner Knight confirmed. Commissioner Daniels asked whether the city has experienced difficulties with parking at similar type of facilities. Principal Planner McPherson answered that there are other tenant spaces like this in the city, some have parking issues while others don’t. Commissioner Daniels asked whether any provisions are in place requiring a renegotiation of the parking agreement if the businesses were to change. Page 5 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 4 of 6 2 8 3 1 Principal Planner McPherson explained that any future modifications to the hours of operation for businesses would require modification to the shared parking agreement. Vice Chairman Boling asked if the parking agreement is between the tenants of both buildings. Assistant City Attorney Young stated that it was between the property owners. Chairman Morales asked about the rolling gate at 9208 Charles Smith Avenue and if it will be left open for customers to park there. Assistant Planner Knight confirmed. Chairman Morales asked staff why there are “No Parking” or ”No Stopping” signs on Charles Smith Avenue. Principal Planner McPherson explained that due to truck routes and the site’s location within a large industrial area, street parking is likely restricted because of the street’s limited width. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Applicant Tangherlini was present and available to answer questions. Chairman Morales asked whether the available parking during peak hours is based on the applicant’s current condition. Applicant Tangherlini responded that during peak hours, additional parking may be needed due to traffic flow, but the demand is not excessive. Vice Chairman Boling stated that one of the responsibilities of staff is to support economic development. He noted that it is always encouraging to see local businesses grow and expand within the city. He explained that economic development involves two key components: attracting new businesses and retaining existing ones, with an emphasis on helping them prosper and succeed. On the topic of business retention, Vice Chairman Boling expressed concern about potential business saturation within a specific industry. While noting that he is not an expert in the gymnastics field, he asked whether there are similar businesses near the proposed relocation site and whether their proximity could negatively impact existing businesses. Applicant Tangherlini replied no and indicated that this was their sixth location they looked at. Commissioner Daniels asked how big their current building is right now. Applicant Tangherlini responded that their current building is 7,600 square feet. Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing. Commissioner Dopp stated that the Conditional Use Permit aligns with the intended purpose of newly designated industrial zones, which is to allow for alternative uses and create synergy within these areas. He expressed support for the proposed use, noting that it brings positive activity to the zone from a zoning perspective. Regarding parking, he commented that if individuals choose to park on Charles Smith Avenue, jaywalking may occur, which is out of their control. He also expressed appreciation for the shared parking proposed. Page 6 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 5 of 6 2 8 3 1 Commissioner Diaz noted the potential for jaywalking and recommended that the applicant speak with parents, encourage them to drop off their children first and then find parking, particularly if they are running late. She expressed her support for the site and stated her belief that the business will be successful. Commissioner Daniels stated that his primary concern is parking; however, based on his familiarity with the existing business, he does not believe it will pose a significant issue. He emphasized the importance of informing parents where they can park if on-site parking is unavailable, considering the shared parking agreement and the way activities are staged; he expressed confidence that there will be adequate parking. Vice Chairman Boling noted that this is a relocation of an existing business and asked whether there have been any prior issues brought to the City’s attention, such as code enforcement, police, or fire department concerns at the current location. Principal Planner McPherson answered no. Vice Chairman Boling commended the applicant for taking proactive steps to address parking deficiencies resulting from the City’s parking requirements. He acknowledged the applicant’s efforts to work collaboratively with neighboring businesses, noting that such cooperation helps mitigate concerns, particularly given the industrial nature of the area. He expressed safety concerns regarding children crossing the street, emphasizing that industrial zones can be hazardous due to the presence of fast-moving large trucks and limited lines of sight. He added that the city is committed to supporting local businesses because business success creates the city’s success. Chairman Morales expressed that he is pleased the applicant is able to expand her business. He stated that relocating to a larger facility supports a safe and healthy community. He stated that parking does not appear to be a concern, as a reasonable solution has been reached. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Daniels Boling; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution 2025-023 to approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00101. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. Director Announcements Principal Planner McPherson announced that the next scheduled HPC/PC meeting will take place in the Council Chambers and expressed appreciation to the Commissioners for their patience. F. Commission Announcements Commissioner Daniels expressed frustration over the State’s Density Bonus Law and suggested that it would be beneficial that the Planning Commission consider drafting a letter to the City Council. If the Council finds merit in the letter, it could then be forwarded to the State Legislature, the League of California Cities, and potentially to surrounding cities. Commissioner Daniels distributed a draft letter he had written for review. He requested that the letter be placed on the next agenda for discussion regarding its merit and for potential edits by the Commissioners. He also noted that City Manager Gillison reviewed the letter. Page 7 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 6 of 6 2 8 3 1 Assistant City Attorney Young noted that the letter could be distributed at the same time as the agenda packet. However, she clarified that Commissioners would not be able to engage in discussion about the letter prior to the meeting. She said any significant edits to the letter would need to be completed before the meeting takes place. Commissioner Daniels stated that, based on his reading of state law, a developer utilizing the Density Bonus Law must provide justification for any requested waivers to the city. While he was unsure of the specific content of those justifications, he noted that the key issue is whether the City’s standards would physically preclude the development. He suggested that it would be helpful if those justifications could be forwarded to the Commission for review. He also shared that Planning Director Nakamura had proposed providing the Commission with an overview of the Density Bonus Law in the coming weeks, including how staff evaluates waiver requests. Commissioner Daniels expressed that such a presentation would help the Commission better understand the process and how staff reviews and assesses the waivers. H. Adjournment Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling, seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Planning Department Approved: Page 8 DATE:August 27th, 2025 TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director INITIATED BY:Jared Knight, Assistant Planner SUBJECT:Tentative Parcel Map - EGL - A request for the subdivision of an existing 21,000 square foot parcel into two new parcels within the Medium Residential (M) zone and the Hillside Overlay, located at 7444 Avila Avenue. This project qualifies for an exemption from CEQA review under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b) (3), as it will not result in a significant or direct impact upon the environment. APN: 0208-921-09 (SUBTPM20986). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map 20986 subject to the attached conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: The 21,000 square foot project site consists of a single parcel located generally northeast of the corner of Avila Avenue and Calle del Prado. The east side of the project site is improved with an existing 3,191 square foot single-family residential structure with frontage on Avila Avenue, while the west side is currently vacant. Additionally, it should be noted that the project site is located in the Hillside Overlay Zone. An aerial view of the project site is provided in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Aerial View of Site Av i l a Av e n u e Page 9 Page 2 of 4 2 9 9 9 The existing land uses, General Plan, and zoning designations for the project site and surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) North Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) South Church Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) East Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) West Hospice Care Facility Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) ANALYSIS: The application is a request to subdivide the project site into two new parcels, hereafter referred to as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. Parcel 1 would include the existing 3,191 square foot single-family residential structure and feature a total area of 11,200 square feet, with frontage on Avila Avenue. Parcel 2 would be vacant and feature a total area of 9,800 square feet, with frontage on Calle del Prado. The proposed subdivision meets all lot dimension standards detailed in Development Code Section 17.35.010 as follows: Standard Requirement Proposed New Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Width Parcel 1 (Corner) - 50’ Parcel 2 – 45’ Parcel 1 – 100’ Parcel 2 – 98’Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 80’Parcel 1 – 112’ Parcel 2 – 100’Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage 30’Parcel 1 – 100’ Parcel 2 – 98’Compliant Minimum Lot Area 4,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 11,200 sq ft Parcel 2 – 9,800 sq ft Compliant Minimum Net Average Lot Area 4,000 sq ft Avg. 10,500 sq ft Compliant No design package or application has been submitted relative to the development of parcel 2. Therefore, the application as presented is for the proposed subdivision only. It should be noted Page 10 Page 3 of 4 2 9 9 9 that as Parcel 2 is located within the Hillside Overlay Zone, any future development that takes place on Parcel 2 shall be subject to the provisions of Development Code Chapter 17.52 – Hillside Development and shall require Hillside Development Review as detailed in Development Code Section 17.16.140. The approximate layout of the proposed subdivision is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 - Proposed New Parcels The proposed subdivision will modify the existing lot coverage and required setbacks of the existing structure located on Parcel 1 as follows: Standard Requirement Current New Analysis Maximum Lot Coverage 50%15%25%Compliant Minimum Rear Yard Setback 10’134’36’Compliant Public Art As there is no development associated with the proposed subdivision, public art is not required. For future development of the site, housing projects with a density of less than 4 units per acre are exempt from the public art ordinance as detailed in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Environmental Assessment State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b) (3) states that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is exempt from CEQA, commonly referred to as a “general rule” exemption. The application is for the subdivision of a previously developed lot and would result in the creation of a new parcel which is consistent with both the general plan and the development code and is surrounded on all sides by parcels which have already been developed. No new development Av i l a Av e n u e Page 11 Page 4 of 4 2 9 9 9 has been proposed as part of the tentative parcel map application. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not have any significant or direct impact upon the environment and is thus exempt from CEQA review. Correspondence 81 notices were mailed to property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on August 12th, 2025. On August 13th,2025, notices were published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. The project site was also posted with physical notices on August 13th, 2025. To date, planning staff have received no comments related to the proposed subdivision. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed new parcel will increase the value of the project site when developed with a new home and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The project promotes the City Council’s core values of “Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere” and “Intentionally embracing and anticipating our future” by creating an opportunity for new housing development within the city. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A – Aerial View of Project Site with Proposed New Parcels Exhibit B – Proposed Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C – Resolution 2025-025 With Conditions of Approval Page 12 6 0 9 3 Aerial View of Project Site with Proposed New Parcels Figure 1 - Aerial View of Project Site Figure 2 - Proposed New Parcels Exhibit A Page 13 EXHIBIT B Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Proposed-Tentative-Parcel-Map Page 14 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBTPM20986 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 21,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL INTO TWO NEW PARCELS WITHIN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (M) ZONE, LOCATED AT 7444 AVILA AVENUE. APN: 0208-921-09 A.Recitals. 1.The applicant, EGL, on behalf of the owner of the property, filed an application for approval of SUBTPM20986, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map is referred to as "the application." 2.On the 27th of August 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 27th, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to the property currently addressed 7444 Avila Avenue, generally located at the northwest corner of Avila Avenue and Calle de Prado, APN: 0208-921- 09; and b.The project site consists of a single 21,000 square foot parcel, currently improved with a single-family residential structure; and Exhibit C Page 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 SUBTPM20986 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27, 2025 Page 2 c.The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel) are as follows: d.The application includes the subdivision of a parcel totaling 21,000 square feet into 2 numbered parcels. Parcel 1 includes the existing single family residential structure and is 11,200 square feet. Parcel 2 is vacant and is 9,800 square feet; and e. The subdivision complies with each of the applicable development standards for lot dimensions Medium Residential (M) Zone as follows: Standard Requirement Proposed New Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Width Parcel 1 (Corner) - 50’ Parcel 2 – 45’ Parcel 1 – 100’ Parcel 2 – 98’ Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 80’ Parcel 1 – 112’ Parcel 2 – 100’ Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage 30’ Parcel 1 – 100’ Parcel 2 – 98’ Compliant Minimum Lot Area 4,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 11,200 sq ft Parcel 2 – 9,800 sq ft Compliant Minimum Net Average Lot Area 4,000 sq ft Avg. 10,500 sq ft Compliant Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) North Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) South Church Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) East Single Family Residential Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) West Hospice Care Facility Suburban Neighborhood Low Medium Residential (M) Page 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 SUBTPM20986 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27, 2025 Page 3 f.The application as submitted includes no development of the proposed new parcel. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of 21,000 square feet into 2 numbered parcels. The underlying General Plan Land Use Map designation is Suburban Neighborhood Low which is intended for the development of medium and low-density residential neighborhoods with a suburban character; and b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code for the Medium Residential (M) Zone; and c. The proposed subdivision will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposal is for the subdivision only and does not include any development of the proposed new parcel. 4. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: a. State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b) (3) states that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is exempt from CEQA, commonly referred to as a “general rule” exemption. The application is for the subdivision of a previously developed lot and would result in the creation of a new parcel which is consistent with both the general plan and the development code and is surrounded on all sides by parcels which have already been developed. No new development has been proposed as part of the tentative parcel map application. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not have any significant or direct impact upon the environment and is thus exempt from CEQA review. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Page 17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 SUBTPM20986 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27, 2025 Page 4 6.The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th OF AUGUST 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Morales, Chairman ATTEST: Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th of August 2025, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 18 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTPM20986 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map - 7444 Avila Ave Location: 7444 AVILA AVE - 020892109-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials , officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures ) (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions , related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 1. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 2. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 3. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/19/2025 Page 19 Project #: SUBTPM20986 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map - 7444 Avila Ave Location: 7444 AVILA AVE - 020892109-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions The project Final Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved and recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorders Office prior to issuance of Building Permits . 1. Standard Conditions of Approval Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): Avila Avenue - 30' from CL Calle Del Prado - 30' from CL 3. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Services Department. 4. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 5Printed: 8/19/2025 Page 20 Project #: SUBTPM20986 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map - 7444 Avila Ave Location: 7444 AVILA AVE - 020892109-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval All public improvement shall be completed prior to occupancy. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: 1) Avila Avenue frontage improvement shall be in accordance with City "Local" Standards as required and include the following: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 2) Calle Del Prado Avenue frontage improvement shall be in accordance with City "Local" Standards as required and include the following: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 5. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 5Printed: 8/19/2025 Page 21 Project #: SUBTPM20986 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map - 7444 Avila Ave Location: 7444 AVILA AVE - 020892109-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits , whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring . Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart , unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 6. All existing easements lying within future rights -of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 7. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and /or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development of each individual lot. Improvements shall be completed and accepted prior to any certificate of occupancy. 9. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 5Printed: 8/19/2025 Page 22 Project #: SUBTPM20986 Project Name: Tentative Parcel Map - 7444 Avila Ave Location: 7444 AVILA AVE - 020892109-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees : 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 10. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 5Printed: 8/19/2025 Page 23 DATE:August 27, 2025 TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director INITIATED BY:Caleb Richards, Senior Landscape Planner SUBJECT:Tentative Parcel Map – Hongjian Tan – A request for the subdivision of an existing 21,163 square foot parcel into two new parcels within the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) zone, located at 13261 Victoria Street. This project qualifies for a Class 15 Categorical Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines 15315 as a Minor Land Division. APN: 0227- 121-45 (SUBTPM21001). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 21001 subject to the attached conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: The 21,163 square foot project site currently consists of a single, unimproved parcel on property addressed 13261 Victoria Street. The property features several trees along the Victoria Street right of way and brush through the property. The frontage of the parcel has been developed with two (2) 12 foot driveways and a public sidewalk. The subject property is in the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) Zone. An aerial view of the project site is provided below in Figure 1. The existing land uses, General Plan, and zoning designations for the project site and surrounding properties are as follows: Page 24 Page 2 of 4 3 0 0 0 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan(L-ESP) North Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan(L-ESP) South Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) East Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) West Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) ANALYSIS: The application is a request to subdivide the project site into two new parcels, hereafter referred to as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. Parcel 1 includes the northern section of the property and will be 10,000 square feet in size. Parcel 2 is proposed as a flag lot with a total area of 11,163 square feet. The proposed Subdivision meets all lot dimension standards detailed in Development Code Section 17.36.010 as follows: Standard Requirement Proposed New Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Width 80’Parcel 1 – 80’ Parcel 2 – 94’Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 100’Parcel 1 – 125’ Parcel 2 – 100’Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage 40’Parcel 1 – 80’ Parcel 2 – See Below Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage (Flag Lot)None Listed*Parcel 2 – 14’Compliant Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 10,000 sq ft Parcel 2 – 11,163 sq ft Compliant Minimum Driveway Width 19’Parcel 1 – 12’Legal Nonconforming Minimum Driveway Width (Flag Lot)12’Parcel 2 – 14’Compliant *Development Code section 17.36.010.C dictates when there is no standard provided, there is no required minimum or maximum for that zone or subzone. Page 25 Page 3 of 4 3 0 0 0 No design package or application has been submitted for Development of Parcel 1 or 2 at this time. Thus, this application is for the subdivision only. The approximate layout of the proposed subdivision is shown below in Figure 2, with the Tentative Parcel Map included with this report as Exhibit B. Public Art Pursuant to Development Code 17.124.010.B, public art is not required as there is no proposed development for either parcel. For future development of the site, housing projects with a density of less than 4 units per acre are exempt from the public art ordinance. Environmental Assessment Planning Department Staff have determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines. The project qualifies as a class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions. The project scope is for the subdivision of a residentially zoned lot into two separate parcels. Both parcels are in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code’s requirements for the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) zone. Both parcels can be adequately served by fire, public safety and utility services, and have driveway access onto the nearest roadway. Both parcels are relatively flat and do not have a slope greater than 20 percent. The parcel proposed to be divided was not involved in a division from a larger parcel within the previous 2 years. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Correspondence 60 notices were mailed to property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on August 13th, 2025. On August 13th, 2025, notices were published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. The project site was also posted with physical notices on August 13th, 2025. To date, planning staff have received no comments related to the proposed subdivision. Page 26 Page 4 of 4 3 0 0 0 FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed new parcels will increase the value of the project site when developed with a new residence and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time developmental impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. CEQA DETERMINATION: Planning Department Staff have determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines. The project qualifies as a class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The project promotes the City Council’s core values of “Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere” and “Intentionally embracing and anticipating our future”. In addition to helping create new housing by creating a new residential parcel, the proposed new parcel’s location near an intermediate and high school may make it appealing and convenient for families. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A – Aerial View of Project Site with Proposed New Parcels SUBTPM21001 Exhibit B – Proposed Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM21001 Exhibit C – Resolution 2025-020 With Conditions of Approval Page 27 Aerial View of Project Site with Proposed New Parcels –SUBTPM21001 – Exhibit A Page 28 EXHIBIT B Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Tentative Parcel Map Page 29 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 21001 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 21,163 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL INTO TWO NEW PARCELS WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL – ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (L-ESP) ZONE, LOCATED AT 13261 VICTORIA STREET. APN: 0227-121-45 A.Recitals. 1.The applicant, Lingyu Huang, on behalf of the owner of the property Hongjian Tan, filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 21001, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map is referred to as "the application." 2.On the 27th day of August 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 27th, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to the property currently addressed 13261 Victoria Street, APNs: 0227-121-45, generally located near the southwestern corner of East Avenue and Victoria Street; and b. The project site consists of a single 21,163 square foot parcel, which is currently vacant and unimproved; and c.The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties, relative to the subject parcel, are as follows: Exhibit C Page 30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-020 Tentative Parcel Map 21001 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27th, 2025 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) North Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) South Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) East Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) West Single Family Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) d. The application includes the subdivision of a parcel totaling 21,163 square feet into 2 numbered parcels. Parcel 1 includes the northern section of the property and is proposed to be 10,000 square feet. Parcel 2 is proposed to be a flag lot totaling 11,163 square feet; and e. The subdivision complies with each of the applicable development standards for lot dimensions in the Low – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) Zone as follows: Standard Requirement Proposed New Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Width 80’ Parcel 1 – 80’ Parcel 2 – 94’ Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 100’ Parcel 1 – 125’ Parcel 2 – 100’ Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage 40’ Parcel 1 – 80’ Parcel 2 – See Below Compliant Minimum Lot Frontage (Flag Lot) None Listed* Parcel 2 – 14’ Compliant Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 10,000 sq ft Parcel 2 – 11,163 sq ft Compliant Minimum Driveway Width 19’ Parcel 1 – 12’ Legal Nonconforming Minimum Driveway Width (Flag Lot) 12’ Parcel 2 – 14’ Compliant *Development Code section 17.36.010.C dictates when there is no standard provided, there is no required minimum or maximum for that zone or subzone. Page 31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-020 Tentative Parcel Map 21001 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27th, 2025 Page 3 f. The application as submitted includes no physical development of structures at the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of 21,163 square feet into 2 numbered parcels. The underlying General Plan Land Use Map designation is Traditional Neighborhood which is intended for the development of single family housing in neighborhoods with traditional pedestrian-oriented development patterns; and b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code for the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) Zone; and c. The proposed subdivision will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposal is for the subdivision only and does not include any development of the site at this time. 4. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: a. The Planning Department Staff have determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions. The project scope is for the subdivision of a residentially zoned lot into two separate parcels. Both parcels are in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code’s requirements for the Low Residential – Etiwanda Specific Plan (L-ESP) zone. Both parcels can be adequately served by fire, public safety and utility services, and have driveway access onto the nearest roadway. Both parcels are relatively flat and do not have a slope greater than 20 percent. The parcel proposed to be divided was not involved in a division from a larger parcel within the previous 2 years. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Page 32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-020 Tentative Parcel Map 21001 City of Rancho Cucamonga August 27th, 2025 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Morales, Chairman ATTEST: Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 2025 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 33 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTPM21001 Project Name: Tan Residence Location: 13261 VICTORIA ST - 022712145-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 1. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials , officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures ) (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions , related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/21/2025 Page 34 Project #: SUBTPM21001 Project Name: Tan Residence Location: 13261 VICTORIA ST - 022712145-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 3. This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions The project Final Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved and recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorders Office prior to issuance of Building Permits . 1. Private easement for ingress/egress and utilites.2. Encroachment permits will be required for any work completed in the right of way. Please note encroachment permits to be separated as follows: - Driveway, sidewalk, curb, gutter - Wet Utilities - Dry Utilities 3. All required public improvements—including but not limited to streets, sidewalks, utilities, stormwater drainage systems, and street lighting—shall be fully constructed and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to approval of the Final Map. 4. Standard Conditions of Approval “Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4” Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 ¼” innerducts in one of the 4” conduits, per City Standard 145. The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.” 5. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 3Printed: 8/21/2025 Page 35 Project #: SUBTPM21001 Project Name: Tan Residence Location: 13261 VICTORIA ST - 022712145-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 6. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 3Printed: 8/21/2025 Page 36