Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CO 2025-166 - RCD-S111, Inc.
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 1 AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 4th day of September, 2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“City”) and RDC-S111,Inc., a California Corporation (“Consultant”). RECITALS A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following design professional services: on-call architectural engineering services (“the Project”). B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant’s Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and design professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to on-call architectural engineering services all as more fully set forth in the Request for Statement of Qualifications, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and Consultant’s proposal, dated January 13, 2025 attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 2 percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by the City’s City Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”. 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties’ signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of two (2) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $200,000 (per year), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 3 such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. 5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, is Kirk Keller, Principal hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 4 6. Consultant’s Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code. 6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 5 performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse or modification (without the professional involvement of the Consultant) of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 6 Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees. 9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 7 11. Indemnification. 11.1 Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 11.0), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, judgments, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), to the extent arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and/or its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual for which or whom the Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design professional,” as the term is defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c). The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost reimbursed by the Consultant to defend the Indemnitees that is charged to Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. 11.2 Other Indemnities. With respect to claims and liabilities which do not arise in connection with the performance of professional services by a “design professional”, as that term is defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), including, but not limited to, those claims and liabilities normally covered by commercial general and/or automobile liability insurance, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and the payment of all consequential damages (collectively “Damages”), in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers, or contractors, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual for which or whom Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of this Agreement, except to the extent the Damages arise from the active or sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Damages with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs as they are actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 8 incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. . 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance. (4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 9 less than: provisions of this Section 12. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) Umbrella liability: $5,000,000 to cover additional accidents or occurrences thereunder Section 12.3.1 and 12.3.2. (6) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 10 Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) To the extent commercially available, for any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) To the extent commercially available, Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. (4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for non- payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein. (5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 11 breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy with the exception of professional liability shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub- subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 12 for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer If to Consultant: RDC – S111 245 E. 3rd Street, Long Beach, CA 90802 Attn: Kirk Keller, Principal 16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 13 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 14 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Consultant Name: RDC-S111, Inc. By: ______________________________ Name Kirk Keller Date ______________________________ Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title By: ______________________________ Name Michael Bohn Date ______________________________ Title (Two signatures required if corporation) Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03 Principal 9/9/2025 | 2:09 PM PDT 9/9/2025 | 6:21 PM PDT Partner Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 9/17/2025 | 2:28 PM PDT Mayor/President 9/17/2025 | 3:00 PM PDT Fire Chief PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 15 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ) #24/25-501 FOR VARIOUS ON-CALL SERVICES City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 30 Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 6 1.5 KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 6 1.6 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.7 CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 7 1.8 PERFORMANCE PERIOD............................................................................................................................... 8 2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Business License ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Prevailing Wages ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Employee Conduct ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 REPRESENTATIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 9 3. SOQ DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS .......................................................................................... 10 3.1 Questions and Clarifications ...................................................................................................... 10 4. SOQ SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSE FORMAT .............................................................. 11 4.1 COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11 4.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 12 4.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 12 4.4 FIRM EXPERIENCE/QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................................................ 12 4.5 THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 12 4.6 STAFF RESUMES AND ORGANIZATION CHART ............................................................................................... 13 4.7 PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH ........................................................................................................... 13 5. DISCIPLINES AND APPLCABLE SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................... 13 5.1 SURVEY AND MAPPING ............................................................................................................................. 14 5.2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIAL SAMPLING/TESTING .................................................................. 14 5.3 GENERAL CIVIL ENGINEERING .................................................................................................................... 14 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 30 5.4 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING .............................................................................. 15 5.5 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION .......................................................................................... 15 5.6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECK ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.7 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING ................................................................................................................... 16 5.8 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ....................................................................................................................... 17 5.9 RIGHT OF WAY COORDINATION ................................................................................................................. 17 6. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS ......................................................................... 18 6.1 INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 18 6.2 EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 18 6.3 DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................................... 18 6.4 REFERENCE CHECK EVALUATION ................................................................................................................. 19 6.5 CONSULTANT SELECTION ........................................................................................................................... 19 6.6 BEST AND FINAL OFFER ............................................................................................................................. 19 6.7 LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 19 6.8 EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 20 6.9 NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 20 6.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 20 6.11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 20 6.12 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 20 6.13 DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 21 6.14 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 21 6.15 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 21 6.16 COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 21 6.17 PRICING ................................................................................................................................................. 22 “EXHIBIT A” CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGACONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .......... 23 “EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” ............................................. 24 “EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” ..................................................................................... 25 “EXHIBIT D” ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................ 26 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 30 “EXHIBIT E DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM ............................................................... 27 “EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ......................................................................................................... 28 “EXHIBIT G” SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY .................................................................................................... 29 “EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET” ..................................................................................................... 30 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 30 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Consultants to submit a Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services, in accordance with the Scope of Services indicated herein. It is the City’s intent to create a qualified Consultants list with multiple Consultants. Responses to this SOQ are electronic only and no paper submittals will be accepted. Consultants wishing to submit a response the SOQ, must be registered as a Consultant with the City through Planet Bids. Registration can be accomplished by visiting the City website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement. Only those responses received from registered Consultants will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Consultant that has downloaded the SOQ this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance with the named Consultants. Submitting a response under a Consultants name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration. 1.2 DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS Consultants finding discrepancies or omissions in the SOQ or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing to the applicable Purchasing contact identified herein in Section 3.1. All questions must be in writing and no responsibility will be accepted for oral instructions. Addenda issued in correspondence to this SOQ shall be considered a part of this SOQ and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this SOQ. 1.3 CONTINGENCIES This SOQ should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for a Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, SOQ responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the SOQ response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so. Completion of this SOQ form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your SOQ response submittal. Consultants must submit signed SOQ responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Consultants will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 30 Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this SOQ and any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement signed by both parties. 1.4 DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION All materials submitted in response to the SOQ solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City option and at the expense of the Consultant submitting the SOQ response. A copy of the SOQ response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Consultant considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act should not be included in the Consultant’s SOQ response as it may be made available to the public. If a Consultant’s SOQ response contains material noted or marked as confidential and/or proprietary that, in the City sole opinion, meets the disclosure exemption requirements, then that information will not be disclosed pursuant to a written request for public documents. If the City does not consider such material to be exempt from disclosure, the material may be made available to the public, regardless of the notation or markings. If a Consultant is unsure if its confidential and/or proprietary material meets disclosure exemption requirements, then it should not include such information in its SOQ response because such information may be disclosed to the public. 1.5 KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS The Consultants shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the SOQ response. Failure to examine any documents or instructions will be at the Consultant’s sole risk. Consultants shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their SOQ responses and in this SOQ, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Consultants by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however, it is the Consultant’s responsibility to ascertain that the SOQ response includes all addenda issued prior to the SOQ due date. 1.6 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS The issuance of this SOQ does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to: Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 30 • Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, SOQ, or SOQ procedure. • Reject any or all SOQs. • Reissue a Request for SOQs. • Prior to submission deadline for SOQs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment, or services to be provided under this SOQ, or the requirements for contents or format of the SOQs. • The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest SOQ response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Consultants who submit SOQ responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this SOQ by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued. • The City reserves the right to inspect the Consultant’s place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Consultant’s capabilities and qualifications. 1.7 CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT The City of Rancho Cucamonga complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6253. (a) Public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. An SOQ in its entirety shall not be considered confidential and proprietary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that any and all materials submitted in response to this SOQ are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253. Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary, or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption actually exists for the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do so. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 30 1.8 PERFORMANCE PERIOD It is the City’s intent to award on-call contracts for the Scope of Services listed in this RFQ. The period of award shall be five (5) years, with up to two (2) additional one-year options to be awarded at the sole discretion of the City upon satisfactory performance of previous work as determined by City staff. 2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Business License Selected Consultants awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected Consultants must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this SOQ and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract. 2.2 Prevailing Wages Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this SOQ, pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected Consultants(s) shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an exemption from the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code § 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC § 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this SOQ that such an exemption will apply or that prevailing wages will not be required for a scope of work covered by this SOQ. 2.3 Employee Conduct All Consultants personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being conducted. While on City property, the Consultant’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no circumstances shall the Consultant’s or Consultant’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City. Consultants or Consultant’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City. Consultant’s personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Consultant’s personnel shall be required to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Consultants, and the public. Nothing contained in this SOQ shall be construed as granting the Consultants the sole right to supply personal or contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 30 2.4 REPRESENTATIVES Should a selected Consultants require the services of a subconsultant to complete the Scope of Services indicated in this SOQ, the awarded Consultants will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right, title, or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Consultants to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. The awarded Consultants shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services including Consultants subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded Consultants or under the awarded Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services. The awarded Consultants shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultants certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services. In case of default by the Consultants, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Consultants, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Consultants for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Consultants. City Representative: For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall be Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and the Consultants shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 30 Consultants Representative: The response to this SOQ shall designate the representative of the Consultants authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the Consultants. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement for directing all activities of consultants and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful Consultants may not change the Consultant’s Representative without the prior written approval of City ’s Representative. 3. SOQ DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Complete SOQ responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be responsible for any delays by transmission errors. Schedule of Events Event Description Date & Time Post SOQ November 18, 2024 Questions Due December 4, 2024, by 3:00 pm Addendum Issued December 12, 2024 SOQ Response Due Date January 6, 2024, by 9:00 am (The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Consultant.) 3.1 Questions and Clarifications All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City’s bid system in accordance with the above “Schedule of Events”. From the issuance date of this SOQ until a Consultant is awarded, Consultants are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 30 4. SOQ SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSE FORMAT Completion of this SOQ and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and evaluate SOQ responses fairly and completely Consultants must comply with the format and submission requirements set out in this SOQ, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with the instruction indicated herein or any part of this SOQ will deem said SOQ response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation process. If only one SOQ response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with an SOQ review and negotiations. SOQ responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper SOQ responses will be accepted. SOQ responses must include the information required by this SOQ. The City has streamlined its various on-call disciplines into one SOQ. Consultants have the option to submit a response for one or multiple disciplines. Please review the detailed response submittal instructions below. Titled tabs have been created in the bid system for section responses. Sections are to be submitted separately unless otherwise instructed. Please submit responses for the following sections to the associated section response type tab in Planet Bids: • Sections 4.1 through 4.8 – These sections shall be compiled as one document with a title sheet separating each numbered section. Submit under the Response File tab. • Section 5.1 Surveying and Mapping – Submit under the Section 5.1 tab. • Section 5.2 Geotechnical Engineering and Material Sampling/Testing – Submit under the Section 5.2 tab. • Section 5.3 General Civil Engineering – Submit under the Section 5.3 tab. • Section 5.4 Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning – Submit under the Section 5.4 tab. • Section 5.5 Construction Management and Inspection – Submit under the Section 5.5 tab. • Section 5.6 Development Plan Check – Submit under the Section 5.6 tab. • Section 5.7 Architectural Engineering – Submit under the Section 5.7 tab. • Section 5.8 Landscape Architecture – Submit under the Section 5.8 tab. • Section 5.9 Right of Way Coordination – Submit under the Section 5.9 tab. 4.1 COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION SOQ responses must include the complete name and address of the Consultant and the name, email address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the SOQ response. A signature by an authorized Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 30 representative must be included on each SOQ response. Said signature will be considered confirmation of the Consultants ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein. 4.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your SOQ response. This section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. 4.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the Consultant’s SOQ response to provide the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Consultant’s approach, qualifications, experience, and availability of staff in terms of workload, current or ongoing projects. 4.4 FIRM EXPERIENCE/QUALIFICATIONS The Consultant shall demonstrate the Consultant’s qualifications, experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this SOQ. The Consultant shall provide a minimum of 6 representative projects that have been completed within the last five years, including a contact person (including name, title, phone number and email) at the agency for whom the work was completed. Each experience shall include a brief description of the scope performed, the years of the work, and the team members involved. Consultants shall provide a brief history of your firm, including the number of years in business, office locations, specifically the address of offices located within the State of California. State whether your organization is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or private nonprofit organization, and the date your company was formed or incorporated. 4.5 THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS If the Consultants intends to subcontract any of the services, provide a detailed list of any subcontractors, partners, or third-party Consultants who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services including but not limited to: • Description of the Consultant’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors, • Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this SOQ, • Describe the specific role of each. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 30 4.6 STAFF RESUMES AND ORGANIZATION CHART An organization chart shall be submitted identifying the staff available to perform the scope of services. The organization chart shall identify the Consultant’s Representative, key personnel for the contract and any subconsultants. Submit the resumes of the key personnel that will be performing the services for the city. Key personnel for each discipline shall be identified on the proposed team organization chart. Should any of the key personnel become unavailable, the Consultant must submit a written request for substitution of this personnel with another party of equal competence for City approval. The Consultant shall provide experienced and licensed personnel, equipment, and facilities to perform the services outlined in this RFQ. All work shall be performed by personnel with the appropriate license registered in registered in the State of California. All surveys, reports, plans, specifications, and cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by the licensed professional. Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the city. Resumes shall be formatted in the following order: • Role within On-Call. • Length of time with the Company. • Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the services described in the Scope of Services herein. • Educational background: technical training, education and experience of employees who would be assigned to perform the services. • Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities. 4.7 PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH Consultant shall describe how the firm intends to manage the aspects of the work to be performed, including overall project management approach and methodology, quality, cost and schedule control procedures, project tracking and performance monitoring procedures, and project progress reporting procedures. 5. DISCIPLINES AND APPLCABLE SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultants shall provide experienced and licensed personnel, equipment, and facilities to perform the following tasks. All work shall be performed by personnel with the appropriate license registered in registered in the State of California. All surveys, reports, plans, specifications, and cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by the licensed professional. Below is a list of anticipated scope of services required within each discipline of this On-Call Contract, however this list is not exhaustive and other services may be required. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 14 of 30 5.1 SURVEY AND MAPPING Surveying and Mapping services that will be required may include, but not be limited to the following: • Topographical survey and aerial surveys • Records of survey • Legal descriptions and plat maps for right-of-way acquisitions • Right of way base mapping • Boundary and control surveys • Monument perpetuation/preservation including pre- and post-construction records. • Prepare and file corner records. • Mark limits of removals • Construction surveying • Survey plan checking. • Prepare and review of tentative tract and a parcel maps and final tract maps and parcel maps. 5.2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIAL SAMPLING/TESTING Geotechnical Engineering and Material Sampling/Testing Services that will be required on-call contract may. include but not be limited to the following: • Geotechnical, hydrological and groundwater investigations • Preparation of subsurface reports and recommendations • Field inspections and material testing • Laboratory materials testing • Hazardous materials evaluations and testing • Preparing Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies • DTSC coordination and permitting. • Evaluation of street, storm drain and retaining wall repairs or maintenance. • Review of asphalt concrete and cement concrete mix designs performed in accordance with ASTM standards. 5.3 GENERAL CIVIL ENGINEERING General Civil Engineering Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include but not be limited to the following: • Preliminary planning and cost estimating for various projects. • Provide project study reports, project reports, value engineering analysis and feasibility studies. • Hydrology and hydraulic food plain studies, and erosion control plans • Utility research and investigations, including potholing and Ground Penetrating Radar Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 15 of 30 • Preparation of plans, technical specifications and cost estimates for various Public Works and Capital Improvement Projects including but not limited to; streets, bicycle facilities, sidewalks and curb ramps, storm drains, site plans, highway improvements and trail improvements projects including park improvements. • Structural engineering services for bridges and retaining walls including structural observations and inspections, structural calculations, structural drawings, shoring plans, and technical specifications. • Landscaping and irrigation design • Lighting design for streets, parking lots and parking structures 5.4 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include but not be limited to the following: • Preliminary planning and cost estimating for various projects. • Provide project study reports, project reports, value engineering analysis and feasibility studies. • Preparation or review traffic engineering reports, traffic impact analysis, traffic signal design plans, and transportation planning studies or project specific traffic related issues analysis • Review traffic impact analysis and scoping agreements related to subdivisions or development projects. • Perform traffic signal warrants, pedestrian studies and other warrants/studies as requested. • Provide speed data analysis, intersection control studies including multi-way stop sign control. • Provide traffic signal or alternatives, safety studies, travel time studies and miscellaneous traffic engineering services. • Preparation of plans, technical specifications and cost estimates for traffic projects including but not limited to; traffic signals, signing and striping, signal interconnect, flashing beacons, pedestrian signals, traffic calming, and temporary traffic control plans. • Provide traffic signal timing plans and coordination timing studies for new or modified traffic signals. • Traffic Plan check services including ability to meet a 2-week review for first plan check and a 1-week review for each subsequent plan check thereafter until plan check review is approved. City may adjust plan check review timeline on an as needed basis depending on project size. 5.5 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION Construction Management and Inspection Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include but not be limited to the following: • Construction management including but not limited to; contract administration, contract negotiation, response to RFIs, submittal reviews, shop drawings, construction scheduling, reviewing change orders, document control, and cost control. • Develop and manage RFI and submittal logs. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 16 of 30 • Coordinate and host pre-construction meeting and progress meetings, including preparation of meeting minutes. • DBE/SBE and grant/loan compliance if applicable • Establish procedures and monitor contractor compliance with federal and state prevailing wage regulations and requirements. • Maintain inspection records and reports. • Perform daily construction observation and inspection ensuring construction conforms to the project documents and report via City’s inspection software. • Ensure the jobsite conditions are in compliance with OSHA requirements. • Coordinate special inspection and material testing with representatives from other agencies if needed. • Prepare daily journals including a log of laborers and time and materials construction activities. • Measure the completed work for the purpose of progress payments. • Liaise between the contractor and City staff. • Provide required field inspection tools including ability to use City’s inspection software. • Coordination and management of the services required, including review of the project site, improvement plans, specifications, and special provisions. • Provide constructability reviews. 5.6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECK Development Plan Check Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Initial plan review will need to determine compliance with City and State codes. • Provide the City with a monthly plan review status report for all assigned projects. • Ability to meet a 2-week review for first plan checks and a 1-week review for each subsequent plan check thereafter until plan check review is approved. City may adjust plan check review timeline on an as needed basis depending on project size. • Map and Improvement plan check review will require a California Licensed Professional Land Surveyor to stamp and/or seal necessary documents. 5.7 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING Architectural Engineering Design Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Preliminary architectural design including planning and cost estimating. • Preparation of plans, technical specifications and cost estimates for new structures or modifications of existing structures Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 17 of 30 • Prepare sketches, renderings and materials boards providing alternative architectural concepts and designs. • Prepare 2D and 3D models, sketches, renderings and elevation drawings of proposed architectural designs and treatments. • Review for conformance with ADA and required standards. • Preparation of permit applications to the Planning and Building Departments • Architectural construction support services and prepare record drawings. 5.8 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Landscape Architecture Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Provie landscape planning and design services for new facilities or modifications to existing facilities • Perform preliminary siting, grading, and landscaping layouts. • Conduct site and field investigations to verify locations of existing and proposed facilities. • Prepare sketches, renderings, and materials boards providing alternative landscaping concepts or options. • Prepare construction drawings, technical specifications, and cost estimates for Landscape Architecture Projects • Irrigation design including preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates. • Provide landscaping construction support services including preparation of record drawings. 5.9 RIGHT OF WAY COORDINATION Right of Way Coordination Services that will be provided under this on-call contract may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Negotiations with property owners for the purchase of right of way • Adherence to Caltrans Right of Way Manual for all standards and operating procedures including completion of Caltrans Right of Way Certification • Prepare all written correspondence, offer packages. • Escrow coordination. • Administration of right of way related contracts (for both state and federally funded projects) including but not limited to, appraisals, negotiations, preparation of offer packages, and signature coordination. • Relocation services • Provide preliminary title reports. • Provide or review loss of business goodwill appraisal. • Notary services for the signing and acquisition documents • Condemnation support Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 18 of 30 • Eminent domain support • Provide title and escrow services. • Coordinate and provide support or information to City Legal staff, if required • Prepare and secure agreements for Possession and Use, Right of Entry, and license or permits form property owners. • Prepare and maintain a schedule of major activities and milestones. • Represent the City at Planning Commission meetings, City Council meetings or legal proceedings, if required 6. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS 6.1 INITIAL SCREENING All SOQ responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those SOQ responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the SOQ requirement as indicated herein will proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process. 6.2 EVALUATION ACTIVITIES SOQ responses deemed as having met the standard requirements indicated herein are evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. The SOQ submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score. The following evaluation criteria and percentages have been assigned to each of the on-call disciplines for the purposes of evaluation and scoring each SOQ response: Evaluation Criteria (By Discipline) Criteria Description Assigned Percentage Conformance to the Specified RFQ Format 10 Company Expertise and Experience 30 Quality of Project Management Administration Approach 25 Project Team Experience 35 6.3 DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS Upon completion of the SOQ evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked Consultants will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a presentation to further expand on their Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 19 of 30 SOQ response(s). Consultant interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as stated within the SOQ. 6.4 REFERENCE CHECK EVALUATION The City may elect to conduct reference checks in lieu of interviews as the final selection criteria. The reference checks will be conducted by phone with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Consultant’s reference contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score from zero (0) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with the criteria scores. It is imperative that Consultants provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Consultant ranking. 6.5 CONSULTANT SELECTION The final Consultant selection is based on which Consultants are the most responsive, meeting the City’s requirements and offering the best value to the city. The City may conduct negotiations with several Consultants simultaneously. The City may also negotiate contract terms with the selected Consultants prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any SOQ responses, or any part thereof, either separately or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the City. 6.6 BEST AND FINAL OFFER The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Consultants. At the conclusion of the evaluation processes, the City will request a Best and Final Offer to be submitted from the finalists. 6.7 LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD After a final Consultant selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all participating, responsive Consultants. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Consultants unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Consultant or withdraw the SOQ entirely. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 20 of 30 6.8 EXHIBITS A THROUGH H The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required. Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem your SOQ submittal as non-responsive. 6.9 NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the city. A signed “Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement, Exhibit A” included herein must be submitted under the Non-Disclosure tab. 6.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Consultant will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City’s bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Consultant and signed by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This SOQ sets forth some of the general provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this SOQ, Consultant will be deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services Agreement Exceptions Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this SOQ response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab Exhibits A – G. 6.11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE Consultants must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The awarded Consultant will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Consultant, will not be accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. 6.12 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Consultant shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this SOQ shall be considered a part of this SOQ and shall become Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 21 of 30 part of any final Contract that may be derived from this SOQ. Consultants must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. 6.13 DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION Bidding Consultants must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Consultant Certification Form” that they are not listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. 6.14 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE Consultants shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet. Bids Response Types, Exhibits A – G. This will indicate a consultants’ agreement to or not to allow other entities. to utilize the SOQ response and awarded contract as a piggyback option. 6.15 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY “Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Unsigned SOQ responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Consultant has carefully examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and hereby proposes and agrees, if the Consultants SOQ response is accepted, Consultant agrees to furnish all material in accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the Consultants SOQ response. 6.16 COMPANY REFERENCES Provide a minimum of three (3) references for each discipline you are interested in. If a reference is included for multiple disciplines, please indicate that on the reference worksheet under the description of services section. The references must be agencies in California that your company has conducted comparable or like services. Preferred references should be current customer within the past three (3) years. Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your SOQ response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the SOQ response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids. Failure to comply with the instruction will determine the Consultants SOQ response as non- responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 22 of 30 6.17 PRICING There is no pricing / cost element included in this SOQ. The SOQ review and Consultant Interview/Presentations (if necessary) will produce a list of qualified Consultants that will then be requested to submit their cost sheets for each submitted response. Pricing should not be discussed anywhere in any responses submitted at this time including samples of other pricing scenarios for sample or other projects. Failure to comply with required format and/or instruction will cause Consultants SOQ response to be considered as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 23 of 30 “EXHIBIT A” CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGACONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Consultants. I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding SOQ responses received in response to the Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 Various On-Call Services. I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any SOQ response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any SOQ response, or removal of same from designated areas. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein. ______________________________________ (Print Name) ______________________________________ (Relationship to the City) ______________________________________ (Relationship to the Consultant) ______________________________________ (Signature) ______________________________________ (Date) Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 24 of 30 “EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” Mark the appropriate choice, below: _____ Vendors accepts the PSA without exception. OR _____ Vendors proposes exceptions to the PSA. Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as “Exception Summary”, which shall include the Vendors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive. ___________________________________ Signature ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Title ___________________________________ Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 25 of 30 “EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________ (President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative) of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the (Name of Company, Corporation or Owner) Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services have been read and understood and that our Vendors is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract. ___________________________________ Signature ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Title ___________________________________ Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 26 of 30 “EXHIBIT D” ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Consultants hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this SOQ have been received, if any. Consultants understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the SOQ response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Consultants’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. • __________________ • __________________ • __________________ • __________________ ___________________________________ Signature ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Title ___________________________________ Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 27 of 30 “EXHIBIT E DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM I certify that neither _____________________________ (Consultant) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. I acknowledge that if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified. ___________________________________ Signature ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Title ___________________________________ Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 28 of 30 “EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of ________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation. Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the city is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Vendors. Successful Vendors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify. YES __________ NO _________ Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 29 of 30 “EXHIBIT G” SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this SOQ response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following SOQ response. THE CONSULTANTS IN SUBMITTING THIS SOQ RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR SOQ RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE. Company Name: Address: (Street, Su. # City, State, Zip) Telephone #: Fax #: E-mail address: Web Address: Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Signature: Date: Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 30 of 30 “EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET” This Exhibit must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the applicable Response Type, section identified as “Exhibit H”” section. Provide a minimum of three (3) clients for each discipline you are interested in. If a reference is included for multiple disciplines, please indicate that on the worksheet below under the description of services section. The references must be agencies in California that your company has conducted comparable or like services within the past three (3) years. Please make the copies of the table below to provide additional reference information for multiple disciplines if necessary. Please verify accuracy of contact information. Reference 1 Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Services (please be specific) Reference 2 Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Services (please be specific) Reference 3 Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Services (please be specific) Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibit H. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Addendum No. 001 Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 For Various On-Call Services December 12, 2024 Re: Consultant Questions/Answers/Clarifications Ladies and Gentlemen: This Addendum will address questions and clarification requests as submitted by Consultants. Only those questions submitted in writing are being addressed and can be found in the below table. The RFP response due date and time is being extended to January 13, 2025, by 9:00 am. If there are any questions regarding this Addendum, please contact me at (909) 774-2500 Sincerely, Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Procurement Division Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 11 Question(s) / Clarification(s) Answer(s) / Comment(s) 1 Please clarify if the reference information requested in Section 4 should be included with the 6 projects requested. Considering that Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet, states that it is not to be discussed in any other area of the SOQ response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids. Failure to comply with the instruction will determine the Consultants SOQ response as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Yes, the references requested under Section 4 for the 6 projects should be included for City awareness. However, the City will only contact the references formally provided under Exhibit H as part of the reference checks for this RFQ. 2 Could the City please clarify if all categories should be combined and submitted as one Response File and also submitted separately under their respective category tabs? Please clarify if reference information should be included with the 6 projects requested. Considering that Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your SOQ response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the SOQ response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids. Failure to comply with the instruction will determine the Consultants SOQ response as non- responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Sections 4.1 to 4.7 should be combined and submitted as one response file. Individual responses and files with the scope of services for each discipline shall be submitted under the appropriate category in Section 5.5 for the disciplines that you are proposing on. See response to Question 1 regarding the references. 3 Please clarify if reference information should be included with the 6 projects requested. Considering that Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your See response to Question 1. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 11 SOQ response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the SOQ response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids. Failure to comply with the instruction will determine the Consultants SOQ response as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. 4 Does the City want resumes for our proposed sub-consultants? Yes, submit resumes for key personnel, including subconsultants as necessary. 5 Section 4. SOQ Submission Requirements and Response Format lays out that a single document for Sections 4.1 through 4.8 must be submitted as the "Response File." There is no Section 4.8. Is this section missing from the RFQ? Additionally, what does the City want submitted as the separate Section 5 tabs? Can this be clarified so that we make sure we are compliant? There is no Section 4.8, only sections 4.1-4.7 are required to be submitted. Quals, resumes, and the org chart submitted within Sections 4.1-4.7 should be representative of all disciplines you are proposing on. Only the description of the offered scope of services for each discipline that you are proposing on should be submitted as separate tabs under Section 5. 6 Due to the holidays and there being several pursuits due at the same time, can you please extend the deadline by one week, to January 13? Yes, the deadline will be extended until January 13, 2025. 7 What is the maximum dollar amount of the contract (annually/or life of contract)? The initial contract award (over the life of the contract) will be $1 Million for each selected consultant. However, there is no guarantee of work or compensation, and the City reserves the right to increase or decrease this limit if needed. 8 How many firms is the City looking to award for each of the listed disciplines on page 11 ? The City does not have a number of consultants set for each discipline but is looking to award to multiple consultants for each category provided that they meet the requirements of the RFQ and that their reference checks are in good standing. 9 Is there a page count limit, and if so what does not count towards it? There is no page count limit. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 11 10 How many firms does the City intend to select for each discipline? See response to Question 8. 11 On Page 11, it states that firms should submit items under the tab for their respective discipline. For example, what information should be included in Section 5.5? See response to Question 5. 12 On Page 11, it states that Sections 4.1 through 4.8 should be submitted under the Response File tab. What information should be listed in Section 4.8? Please see answer to Question 5. 13 Please confirm to whom at the City the cover letter by the Consultant should be addressed to? Marlena Perez 14 Could the City please clarify if Section 5.6 Development Plan Check pertains to Engineering, Building and Safety, Planning Review, or all three? The Development Plan Check only pertains to Engineering. Building and Safety and Planning Review are under different on-call contracts at the City. 15 Section 4 of the RFP states that the response file will be comprised of information discussed in sections 4.1 through 4.8. However, when the section requirements are broken down there are only sections 4.1 through 4.7. Is there a requirement for section 4.8 or was that a typo? Please see answer to Question 5. 16 Exhibit "A" - There are five lines to be filled on the Exhibit. It is understood that the first line would be the printed name of the "Consultant's Representative" as defined on Page 10 of the Request for Statement of Qualifications. The fourth line will be the signature of the Consultant's Representative, and the fifth line will be the date of signature of the Consultant's Representative. Please indicate as to what information needs to be presented on the second (Relationship to the City) and the third line (Relationship to the Consultant). Print name, indicate what your relationship to the City is, i.e. current vendor, related to any City staff….. or none, indicate what your relationship is to the Consultant are you an owner, related to staff….. or none, sign and date Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 11 17 Exhibits "A" through "H", inclusive - It is understood that Exhibits "A" through "H", inclusive will need to be provided by the consultant submitting the Statement of Qualifications - Would submittal of any of said Exhibits be required by any of the sub- consultants that the consultant may retain as part of the consultant's team? If so, please indicate which Exhibit(s). Exhibits A through G are only required for the prime consultant. Exhibit H needs to be provided for the prime and subconsultants. 18 On Page 16 of 30 - Section 5.6 - Last bullet point - What will be the seal and signature requirements of the professional engineers who will be reviewing improvement plans during the initial plan check period and when the plans have received the seal and signature of the professional engineers in charge of preparation of the improvement plans? Improvement plans shall be reviewed by or under the supervision of a California Licensed Professional Engineer. 19 On Page 16 of 30 - Section 5.6 - Last bullet point - Will the seal and signature of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of California or alternatively the seal and signature of a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California authorized to practice survey be required under the City Surveyor's Statement on final tract and parcel maps? The last bullet point from Section 5.6 will be removed and this task will be part of a separate Proposal Request. 20 On Page 16 of 30 - Section 5.6 - Last bullet point - It is understood that map review services and review of legal descriptions and plats will be conducted by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of California or a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California authorized to practice survey. It is understood that the review of improvement plans will be conducted by registered professional engineers in the State of California. Please clarify/ confirm. See response to Questions 18 and 19. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 11 21 On Page 16 of 30 - Section 5.6 - Last bullet point - Will the review of the final tract maps and parcel maps be conducted by the Development Plan Check consultant selected for Section 5.6 functions, or will the review of the final tract maps and parcel maps be conducted by the Survey and Mapping consultant selected for Section 5.1 functions? The final tract maps and parcel maps, under City Surveyor's Statement, require the signature of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of California or the signature of a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California authorized to practice survey. Will the signatures under City Surveyor's Statement be made by the Development Plan Check consultant selected under Section 5.6 or will it be made by the Survey and Mapping consultant selected for Section 5.1 functions? Neither the consultant selected for 5.1 or 5.6. This task will be revised to only include “prepare tentative and final tract and parcel maps.” See response to Question 19. 22 On Page 14 of 30 - Section 5.1 - Last bullet point - Will the review of the final tract maps and parcel maps be conducted by the Survey and Mapping consultant selected for Section 5.1 functions, or will the review of the final tract maps and parcel maps be conducted by the Development Plan Check consultant selected for Section 5.6 functions? The final tract maps and parcel maps, under City Surveyor's Statement, require the signature of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of California or the signature of a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California authorized to practice survey. Will the signatures under City Surveyor's Statement be made by the Survey and Mapping consultant selected for Section 5.1 or will it be made by the Development Plan Check See response to Question 21. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 11 consultant selected under Section 5.6 functions? 23 On Page 11 of 30 - Section 4 - First bullet point on the page - Sections 4.1 through 4.8 is referenced - Section 4.8 seems to be missing. See response to Question 5. 24 Will the City look to choose a variety of different consultants than in previous years? In other words, are all firms eligible even if they have previously held the on call contract? Yes, all firms are eligible even if they have not been on previous on-calls with the City. 25 How many consultants will you select in each category? See response to Question 8. 26 Are you able to share how much work was given out during the past cycle….ie: value of contracts given / how many projects, etc. See response to Question 7. The City will not be providing this information at this time. However, the number of contracts given to each consultant under the on-call as it is based on the total contract value and not the number of projects. 27 Can you provide a list of consultants who currently hold the on call in each category? The City will not be providing this information at this time. 28 On RFQ page, 4th paragraph it states: “Please submit responses for the following sections to the associated section response type tab in Planet Bids” In the bullet list after the 4th paragraph it states: • Section 5.1 Surveying and Mapping – Submit under the Section 5.1 tab. // • Section 5.2 Geotechnical Engineering and Material Sampling/Testing – Submit under the Section 5.2 tab. // • Section 5.3 General Civil Engineering – Submit under the Section 5.3 tab. // • Section 5.4 Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning – Submit under the Section 5.4 tab. // • Section 5.5 Construction Management and Inspection – Submit under the Section 5.5 tab. // • Section 5.6 Development Plan Check – See response to Question 5. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 11 Submit under the Section 5.6 tab. // • Section 5.7 Architectural Engineering – Submit under the Section 5.7 tab. // • Section 5.8 Landscape Architecture – Submit under the Section 5.8 tab. // • Section 5.9 Right of Way Coordination – Submit under the Section 5.9 tab.” We understand that we should only add information for those services we want to propose on; however, we have reviewed the text in Section 5. DISCIPLINES AND APPLCABLE SCOPE OF SERVICES from the bottom of page 13 to the top of page 18, and none of the text here seems to ask for any information. QUESTION. Can you please explain what, if anything, should be submitted under the tabs for Section 5.1 to 5.9? 29 On RFQ 12, under 4.4 Firm Experience/Qualifications that we are to include in our SOQ it states: “The Consultant shall demonstrate the Consultant’s qualifications, experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this SOQ. The Consultant shall provide a minimum of 6 representative projects that have been completed within the last five years, INCLUDING A CONTACT PERSON (INCLUDING NAME, TITLE, PHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL) AT THE AGENCY FOR WHOM THE WORK WAS COMPLETED. EACH EXPERIENCE SHALL INCLUDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SCOPE PERFORMED….” [emphasis in CAPS added] However, on page 21 of the RFQ it states “Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. WHILE THE REFERENCE WORKSHEET ACCOMPANIES See response to Question 1. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 11 YOUR SOQ RESPONSE IT IS NOT TO BE DISCUSSED IN ANY OTHER AREA OF THE SOQ RESPONSE other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids. Failure to comply with the instruction will determine the Consultants SOQ response as non- responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process.” [emphasis in CAPS added], and Exhibit H on page 20 of the RFQ asks for virtually the same information (name, title, address, phone number, email, and description of services) as is requested in section 4.4. QUESTION. These statements seem to contradict each other with one asking that we include project/client contact information in section 4.4 of our SOQ and the second saying that reference information cannot be discussed a 30 On RFQ page, 4th paragraph it states: “Please submit responses for the following sections to the associated section response type tab in Planet Bids: • Sections 4.1 through 4.8 – These sections shall be compiled as one document with a title sheet separating each numbered section. Submit under the Response File tab.” However, the numbered sections that follow only go up to 4.7. QUESTION. Is this a typo, and it should read “• Sections 4.1 through 4.7”? See response to Question 5. 31 The RFP mentioned that Section 4.1 - 4.8 should be submitted under the Response File tab, should there be a 4.8? I do not see this section in the RFP. See response to Question 5. 32 Could you confirm what information you would like to see in the discipline sections (ie - include specific quals, resumes, org chart - or should that all stay in section 4.1- 4.8)? See response to Question 5. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 11 33 Our firm is interested in submitting an SOQ for Discipline and Scope of Services 5.5. Our firm does perform a majority of the services provided in 5.5 under this on-call contract, we do not perform all of them. Do we need to be able to perform all services listed in Discipline 5.5 (including those that may be added), or may we submit the SOQ for the services we do provide? No, you do not need to perform all disciplines, you can submit the SOQ for only the scope of services you wish to provide. Only include the scope of work for the disciplines in Section 5.5 that you want to perform. 34 How many firms will be selected for the On Call list? Can you provide us with the current names of the incumbents of this list. See responses to Questions 8 and 27. 35 In Section 4.2, the SOQ requests a comprehensive Table of Contents listing all materials, exhibits, and supplemental information. However, the instructions for Exhibit H specify that it should only be uploaded in the designated section of the Planet Bid system and must not be discussed in any other area of the SOQ response. Should Exhibit H be included in the Table of Contents, or should it be excluded to comply with the restriction against referencing it outside the designated area? All exhibits can be referenced in the TOC. However, Exhibit H itself should only be submitted under the portal for Exhibit H on planet bids. 36 On page 11, Section 4 references Section 4.8; however, there does not appear to be any additional references to this section elsewhere in the document. Would you please confirm if there is an additional section that should be included for consideration? See response to Question 5. 37 Can you confirm whether or not building inspection services are part of this RFQ? See response to Question 14. 38 Where can I find the scope of work for environmental consultants? I could not find it in the SOQ. This RFQ does not include environmental consulting services. The City has a separate On-Call for environmental services that is held through the Planning Department. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 11 39 In section 5.6 Development Plan Check. What discipline is the City looking for here? For example, is the City looking to hire different disciplines such as a landscape architectural firm to provide plan checking services for submitted landscape plans? The primary discipline required for the tasks listed under section 5.6 is Civil Engineering. The City is interested in having the ability to have different disciplines other than Civil Engineering available, but cannot guarantee the number of plan checks. 40 Please clarify what information is required for submittal under the tabs for the Sections 5.1 - 5.9, since the required information appears to be included in Sections 4.1-4.8? Please confirm there is no section 4.8 - all as shown on page 11 of 30 of RFQ.. See response to Question 5. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Last Revised: 01/11/2018 Page 16 EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT PROPOSAL Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Response to: Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various on-Call Services January 13, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 245 East Third Street, Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 f 562.901.1501 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 2 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 3 Cover Letter January 13, 2025 Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Marlena Perez, Thank you for the opportunity to submit our qualifications to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Various On-Call Services for the following design-related disciplines: 5.7 Architectural Engineering and 5.8 Landscape Architecture. Studio One Eleven is a Southern California-based, integrated practice of architecture, landscape architecture and urban design dedicated to helping cities become more vibrant, livable, and sustainable. We are excited about this On-Call opportunity and are well-positioned to assist the city in the creation of an active public realm that will enhance the quality of life for residents and visitors. As recognized leaders in the field with over two decades of experience, we believe in our ability to be a valuable partner to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Our team has extensive experience in transforming existing urban spaces, including renovations, changes-of-use, and expansion of project scales. In addition to working with city entities in developing their vision’s for the future of their city as exemplified in our contribution to the creation of the recently adopted Epicenter Master Plan. We look forward to collaborating with you, as we have with other cities and communities throughout Southern California, as an on-call consultant, to produce successful projects positively impacting the lives of Rancho Cucamonga residents and visitors. Our firm is known for its innovative and collaborative approach to community-oriented design. We possess expertise in conceptualizing, designing, and implementing viable, impactful projects that address the complex needs of city dwellers today and for years to come. Our designs aim to expand social equity, build community and place, incorporate 21st century mobility and integrate environmental sustainability. With the forthcoming enhancement of the already multi-modal Cucamonga Station to now host the new Brightline West high-speed passenger rail, we see alignment in the city’s goals with ours in a desire to seek sustainable mobility for the future. We are excited at the opportunity to be associated with working in a city that shares these aspirations to redefine how people travel. In our response that follows, we will demonstrate our experience working directly in partnership with city agencies and other organizations to design and document small and large-scale projects, with a specific focus on commercial rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, parks, plaza, and streetscape improvements. We appreciate the complexity involved in delivering important urban developments, and have a long history of working with internal and external stakeholders to establish consensus and facilitate positive outcomes. Studio One Eleven can perform all phases of work, ranging from initial design concepts and visualizations to public outreach and the preparation of construction documents with technical specifications for public bid notice and award. Our leadership and technical staff are well versed in coordinating various disciplines and representing our clients during the construction contract administration phase of a project. We welcome the opportunity to provide comprehensive and wide-ranging landscape architecture design services and look forward to further discussing our qualifications with you. Should you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at kirk.keller@ studio-111.com, or (562) 247-6206, as primary contact and authorized representative of the firm. This proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than 90 days from the date of submittal. Fee schedule is submitted separately. Kirk Keller, ASLA, CLARB, LEED AP Principal, Studio One Eleven kirk.keller@studio-111.com, 562-247-6206 Studio One Eleven 245 E. 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 Our designs are inspired by careful assessment of program, culture and place Section 4.1: Cover Letter / Introduction Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 4 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 5 Studio One Eleven Office, Long Beach, CA Table of Contents Section 4.1: Cover Letter 3 Section 4.3: Executive Summary 7 Section 4.4: Firm Experience/Qualifications 9 Section 4.5: Third-Party / Subcontractors 26 Section 4.6: Staff Resumes and Organization Chart 39 Section 4.7: Project Management Approach 49 Section 4.2: Table of Contents Our designs are inspired by careful assessment of program, culture and place Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 6 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 7 Section 4.3: Executive Summary Executive Summary Our Experience Studio One Eleven is a Southern California-based, integrated practice of architecture, landscape architecture and urban design dedicated to helping cities become more vibrant, livable, and sustainable. We have assembled a portfolio of built work which includes: • 180+ professional and community association awards • 2500+ units of housing (1000 affordable units) • 18+ miles of streetscapes • 40+ communities served • 12+ Agency on-call and peer review service contracts Established relationships and 25 years of practice has enabled us to understand and appreciate the various dynamics and forces at play in getting public realm and redevelopment projects successfully implemented in Southern California cities. We possess expertise in conceptualizing, documenting, and implementing viable and impactful projects at a variety of scales. We provide a full spectrum of services in the planning of districts, blocks, streetscapes, alleys, playgrounds, plazas, and community spaces. Our past downtown revitalization, public realm and streetscape work has produced transformative projects and our planning and visioning efforts have paved the way for revitalization in many downtowns. We have been engaged in visioning and urban design efforts with the City of Rancho Cucamonga including developing the recently adopted Epicenter Master Plan. Design Principles Design at multiple scales - Each project is an opportunity to incrementally enhance the urban condition. We design at the scale of the neighborhood and the scale of the storefront. Put People at the Center - Designing for Urban Life is designing for people. We create inspiring places that prioritize the needs, aspirations, and wellbeing of people and the communities we serve. Reframe Constraints as Opportunities - We are optimistic about the potential of design to create impactful change. We drive towards ideal outcomes for places by innovating around real-world constraints. Embrace the Messy - Vibrant places are often made special by their quirks. We see design as a tool to enable this spontaneous life to flourish and celebrate the inherent character of a place. Our Process S111 has built a design culture that looks for potential to enhance the character and vitality of the public realm, building on the existing assets of each place. We clearly define deliverables, set focused objectives, and establish quantifiable metrics for success at the outset of each project. We prioritize user-friendly design and concise, graphic and visual communication of information. We excel at employing a range of methods to foster meaningful participation and collaboration among our diverse clients and communities. We strive to expand social equity, build community and a sense of place, incorporate 21st-century mobility, and integrate environmental sustainability into every project we undertake. We identify and implement the right design interventions for each project at the appropriate scale. Our Innovation and Commitment Studio One Eleven has been honored with two prestigious awards, underscoring our impact as a firm dedicated to meaningful design and innovation. We received Architect’s Newspaper’s Best of Practice Editor’s Pick Award for Medium Firm, a powerful acknowledgment of our team’s exceptional work culture, commitment to social impact, and unwavering pursuit of design excellence. This recognition affirms that our workplace and projects embody architecture’s transformative potential to create positive change in urban communities, reflecting our ethos of practicing what we preach. Additionally, our modular housing project, Watts Works, earned Fast Company’s Innovation by Design Award, celebrated for prioritizing Quality of Life and demonstrating how thoughtful design can address critical housing challenges. These honors validate our mission to inspire others and champion a more equitable, vibrant future for cities everywhere.We utilize landscape to connect public spaces and create beautiful outdoor rooms Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 8 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 9 45 Employees Comprised of licensed architects, planners, landscape architects, sustainability experts and graphic designers. Up to eight employees are available to work on various projects at any given time. Focus Our Values We are passionate about using design to create better outcomes for the communities we serve. As designers, we believe in our responsibility to craft the built environment in ways that support our collective well-being, today and into the future. For us, this means a commitment to meeting our client’s goals while also addressing the social, economic and environmental health of the broader community through our work. We enjoy proactively initiating projects with community partners and bringing impactful, innovative ideas to life. Our Work The core of our practice is the repair of cities and positive transformation of communities through architecture, landscape architecture and urban design. However, we don’t define our work by singular typologies - instead, we conceptualize our projects as urban interventions at a variety of scales - from planning, to architecture, streetscapes, parks and open space improvements and tactical demonstrations - to promote resilient, prosperous and joyful cities, and improve livability and wellness. Over the course of this work, our projects often address the complex issues that shape the daily lives of city dwellers. Our Method Studio One Eleven’s practice is rooted in the integration of our core skills - architecture, landscape architecture and urban design. We begin with a multidisciplinary approach to define a project brief that best fits our client’s needs, the neighborhood’s character and community input. Shaping the urban context is complex work, which is why we forge partnerships with the most progressive experts to provide viable and impactful design solutions. 25 Years In Business Founded in 2000 we are a California C-Corporation 180+ Awards and commendations from numerous professional and community associations. Championing Housing for All Renewing the Public Realm Building Community & Place Supporting 21st Century Mobility Furthering Equity & Sustainable Design 245 east third st. long beach, CA 90802 t 562.901.1500 www.studio-111.com Section 4.4: Firm Experience / Qualifications We design to reflect unique cultures and creative learning experiences Firm Experience/Qualifications Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 10 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 11 Experience Studio One Eleven (S111) and our consultant team has the depth of experience and skilled staff to fully perform all the services required to partner with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide comprehensive and wide-ranging landscape architecture and irrigation design on-call services, and we would enthusiastically welcome the prospect to further contribute to the City’s growth. For over 20 years we have been creating vibrant public spaces embraced by their communities. We have worked with numerous public agencies, departments, commissions, elected officials, and community members to develop small- and large-scale visioning efforts, public outreach engagements, and innovative and implementable plans that have consistently resulted in award- winning projects. Our office has found success by collaborating and communicating early and often with city representatives and key stakeholders to align expectations with measurable outcomes. We know how to organize landscape architectural improvements while also bringing in our lens as urbanists and architects to create great public realm places. Many of the architectural and landscape architectural roots in the studio were founded upon working with local City governments through incremental improvement projects to revitalize existing communities and streetscapes. We understand that small interventions can provide large impacts to existing public spaces and can address many needs simultaneously such as accessibility, sustainability, safety, aesthetics, as well as the ever-evolving needs for end-users. As champions of human-centered design, we make sure that our solutions respect and enhance the communities we work with. Through our work, we have created more vibrant and welcoming public spaces and commercial corridors that have become beloved community destinations for people to live, work, and play. In addition our work has been validated by many professional organizations. Our involvement in SteelCraft Bellflower and Steelcraft Garden Grove, which activated vacant sites adjacent to the City Center, was recognized with awards from the American Institute of Architects (AIA), the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), and the American Planning Association (APA). Our adaptive re-use project the Santa Ana Arts Collective has received multiple awards including AIA California Honor award. Our design for the Urban Green in Reno, NV received Nevada ASLA Project of the Year and the Paramount Boulevard Streetscape Improvement project was recognized with an Honor Award by southern California ASLA. Additionally, we have been a long standing partner with the Long Beach Airport which has received local, regional and national awards for its world-class, inviting atmosphere. At S111 we have championed influential public realm projects for many regional cities as an on-call landscape architecture consultant. We highlight the importance of outlining clear objectives and goals at the outset of a project and understanding the players and process involved. Documenting the important targets for a project and confirming stakeholder commitment provides the road map for project delivery, and critical decisions that follow can be checked against these original objectives to ensure the project is on track. This on-call RFP requests a spectrum of landscape architectural design and documentation services that our team is well-versed in. Our seasoned professionals have decades of experience interacting with agencies and municipal departments including Planning, Public Works, Building & Safety, Community and Economic Development to coordinate complex projects, demanding schedules, and strict requirements to deliver high quality work. We understand the collaborative nature of demanding schedules, public projects, which often include many disciplines, diverse viewpoints, and multiple agencies. Many of our past clients have consistently recognized our value as dedicated team players who are committed and easy to work with. Services With an emphasis on creating cohesive, sustainable, and vibrant pedestrian-scaled spaces, our designs begin by evaluating the context, connectivity, and history of a place to identify project constraints and opportunities for site specific place-making. We work quickly to establish project goals, public realm character, and determine programming of outdoor spaces in collaboration with community partners and city agencies. While working efficiently, we focus on attention to detail about budget throughout the design and documentation process to minimize RFI’s and change orders during construction. S111 is a full-service firm; we can prepare architectural, urban design and landscape design concepts (design intent, narratives, project goals, diagrams, supportive precedent imagery, illustrative plans, sections and 3D vignettes); feasibility studies including SWOT analysis; custom tailored community engagement (strategy, outreach, bilingual facilitation, presentation materials and data analysis); project management, contract documents (schematic design through construction documents and specifications), permitting, bidding support and construction administration / observation. Commitment We are committed to building trust, soliciting informed feedback, and facilitating successful outcomes by being invested in a project’s success from the evolution of an idea through construction completion. Our past downtown revitalization and streetscape work has produced transformative projects such as The Streets in Long Beach, Sherman Way in Reseda, Paramount Boulevard in Paramount, and Sepulveda Boulevard in Westchester. Our planning and visioning efforts have paved the way for revitalization in downtown Lomita, Glendale, Paramount, Torrance, and Long Beach. Notably for our consistent efforts Studio One Eleven received a Merit Award by the Los Angeles Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA) in the ‘Hard- Won Victories’ category for our Downtown Mar Vista Beautification Project in partnership with LANI, VisionZero, LA Great Streets, LADOT Livable, Los Angeles Council District 11, and the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office. This award focuses on a planning and implementation effort undertaken by professional planners and the community in the face of difficult circumstances. S111 recognizes that our value lies with our employees. Our key personnel are involved in the project for its entirety as part of our commitment to project success, and 100% availble when needed. Innovation and Grant Funding Our firm is known for its innovative, collaborative, and sustainable approach to design. At Studio One Eleven we help agencies find common ground with project stakeholders to advance public projects and benefit the community’s well-being, while simultaneously pushing for innovation and sustainability. We believe that our forward-thinking approach, collaborative process during all project phases, deep knowledge of our regional communities, and commitment to a true partnership with the City of Rancho Cucamonga aligns well with the tasks required for on-call services. Looking for potential to enhance the character and vitality of the public realm is built into our design culture. We have worked with numerous clients to develop innovative plans and visioning efforts that successfully combine design excellence with funding opportunities. In the last five years S111 has designed projects that have received a combined $32 million in grant funding. For example, our work for the City of Bellflower looked beyond a specific improvement project to include visioning for a block- long streetscape enhancement proposal. As a result, the city was able to secure a $1million Caltrans grant to fund public realm enhancements. Our recent design leadership on the Rancho Los Cerritos Stormwater Reclamation Plan resulted in $4 million in grants from the Port of Long Beach and Rivers and Mountains Conservancy; The Oak View Neighborhood Beautification Plan received a $ 5million grant from Caltrans for the City of Huntington Beach. S111 completed full documentation for both projects and they are currently advancing in construction. Additionally, our work on Centro Cha Long Beach was awarded $5 million grant funding from the State of California; the Living EmPower House cutting-edge project in Santa Ana was the winner of a $9 million Studio One Eleven Office, Flex Street, Long Beach, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 12 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 13 California Energy Commission Electric Program Investment Charge Program (EPIC) grant along with $5 million in matching funds; and our Store One project in Anaheim received a $3 million construction grant from Federal Economic Development Administration. Our Process S111 has built a design culture that looks for potential to enhance the character and vitality of the public realm, building on the existing assets of each place. We begin each project by outlining deliverables, setting clear goals, and establishing success metrics. Our approach prioritizes user-friendly design and concise, visually oriented communication to ensure information is accessible and engaging. We excel at engaging diverse communities and stakeholders through various formats, fostering inclusive and meaningful participation. Guided by pressing urban issues, our work aims to advance social equity, strengthen community and place, integrate 21st-century mobility, and embed environmental sustainability in every project. Through rigorous research, collaboration, and engagement, we identify and implement context-appropriate design interventions at the right scale for each endeavor. Design Principles Design at multiple scales - Each project is an opportunity to incrementally enhance the urban condition. We design at the scale of the neighborhood and the scale of the storefront. Put People at the Center - Designing for Urban Life is designing for people. We create inspiring places that prioritize the needs, aspirations, and wellbeing of people and the communities we serve. Reframe Constraints as Opportunities - We are optimistic about the potential of design to create impactful change. We drive towards ideal outcomes for places by innovating around real-world constraints Embrace the Messy - Vibrant places are often made special by their quirks. We see design as a tool to enable this spontaneous life to flourish and celebrate the inherent character of a place. Community Engagement We are aware that every city and community should be treated uniquely and advocate for collaboration and meaningful public engagement with city staff, stakeholders, and community members to help shape decision-making together. Outreach are tools to build awareness and education, and to create project champions, ultimately increasing popular support and improving project outcomes. Our team has worked with a wide range of local business owners, private developers, agency staff, and elected officials, and take great care in asking thoughtful questions to get meaningful input. We can provide community outreach services and engagement deliverables for any project. Sustainability A recent example of our commitment to furthering sustainability is “Looking Back to Advance Forward” a revolutionary stormwater reclamation project at Rancho Los Cerritos spearheaded by S111 to capture up to 95% of the rainwater for re-use, the first of its kind on a local, state and national historic site to employ such an extensive system. Additionally, our cutting-edge Living EmPower House project in Santa Ana is leading the charge toward a sustainable future with its groundbreaking development. This project is set to be the FIRST zero-carbon, replicable, and equitable multifamily development designed for transactive energy. We believe that our forward-thinking and sustainable approach, collaborative process during all project phases, deep knowledge of our regional communities, and commitment to a true partnership with the City of Rancho Cucamonga aligns well with the tasks required for the Landscape Architecture & Irrigation Design Services On-Call. Financial and Liability Condition RDC-S111, Inc is financially solvent with no bankruptcy, planned office closures, impending mergers, or any other condition that may affect the firm’s ability to complete on call services. Studio One Eleven does not have any significant prior or ongoing contract failures. This ASLA Honor Award winning half-mile long streetscape project was designed to create places for people, incorporate sustainable design practices, modernize the local transit system, enhance lighting and wayfinding, and improve the safety of pedestrians. Studio One Eleven completed a full analysis of existing conditions, uses, and mobility requirements of cars, buses, and pedestrians in the public right of way as well as an understanding of what improvements should be encouraged to create a more livable and greener street in the heart of Paramount. We collaborated with the city on public outreach and designed and documented the streetscape as a ‘kit of parts’ that consisted of: reduced traffic lane widths, a new signalized intersection, mid-block pedestrian crossings, a public parklet, custom bus stop trellises, traffic calming medians, a public dining paseo, new parkway planting, widened sidewalks, bulb-outs at intersections, on street parking, graphic crosswalks, pedestrian lighting and street furniture. Studio One Eleven and the civil engineer worked together to redesign street drainage to flow into curbside bioswales, reducing the storm-water impacts on the existing infrastructure system and augmenting the landscape irrigation system with winter rains. This project has served to not only enhance downtown Paramount but has also led to recent improvements of other streets, the civic center and the rehabilitation of all transit shelters and bus stops throughout the City. Client: City of Paramount Scope: PRIME - Conceptual Design, 3D Visualizations, Design Development, Construction Documentation, Specifications, Permitting, Construction Administration/Observation Duration: 2014-2016 (Streetscape) 2019 - current (bus shelters, medians, plaza, parks & open spaces) Key Staff: Kirk Keller, Moiri Fleming, David Sabunas Reference: Adriana Figueroa, Director of Public Works, City of Paramount, 562.220.2100 afigueroa@paramountcity.com Paramount Boulevard Urban Revitalization Paramount, CA This streetscape renovation helped re-envision the character of downtown Paramount and serves as a catalyst for additional public improvements throughout the city Recognized: ASLA Honor Award Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 14 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 15 The City of Huntington Beach partnered with Studio One Eleven to transform Oak View, one of the city’s most densely populated and historically underserved neighborhoods. From concept through completion, Studio One Eleven was involved in every phase of this comprehensive beautification initiative, which focused on enhancing streetscapes, open spaces, and introducing new signage and murals. We also supported the City’s successful grant application, securing $5 million from the Caltrans Clean California Initiative, which funded the majority of this impactful $6.5 million project. Studio One Eleven led extensive community outreach sessions, engaging residents to gather feedback on design elements and prioritize key improvements. The final design reflects this input, emphasizing a safer, greener, and more walkable neighborhood. Key features include traffic-calming bulb-outs with drought-tolerant plantings, pedestrian-friendly crosswalks, street lighting and integrated stormwater management solutions that reduce runoff and improve environmental health. The addition of over 120 trees further enhances the area, creating shaded, inviting spaces along the streetscape. In collaboration with residents, the city, and a local artist, the project celebrates Oak View’s rich culture and history. Vibrant street murals and thoughtfully designed entry signage bring the neighborhood’s unique identity to life, fostering pride and community spirit. Client: City of Huntington Beach Role: Grant Support, Graphic Design, Conceptual Design, Outreach, Construction Documentation, Permitting and Bidding, Construction Administration. Duration: 2021 - 2024 Key Staff: Kirk Keller, Moiri Fleming Reference: Chau L. Vu, Director of Public Works, City of Huntington Beach, 714.374.5345 Chau.vu@surfcity-hb.org Oak View Neighborhood Beautification and Masterplan Huntington Beach, CA Creating a vibrant, safer, and more connected community while honoring its unique character Considering the natural growth pattern of cities, we envisioned a revitalized urban environment that gradually and strategically re-integrated a declining eight-block area into downtown Long Beach. Working in close partnership with the City of Long Beach and multiple stakeholders, Studio One Eleven guided a variety of strategic public realm enhancements, building renovations and street infrastructure improvements from concept to implementation. These included the redesign of Harvey Milk Park and Equality Plaza, a dramatic transformation of 3rd Street, 4th Street and North The Streets Long Beach, CA The project is an ever-evolving canvas of strategic public realm enhancement, community activation and a continuous testing ground for new ideas. Promenade streetscapes to introduce upgraded sidewalks and enhanced crosswalks, new bus stops, outdoor dining, bulb-outs, bike lanes, stormwater mitigation and traffic calming measures. The project also included improvements to the adjacent public parking structure, adaptive re-use of existing buildings to introduce new retail and commercial activity, initiating a flexible street and pedestrian promenade, farmer’s markets, and vibrant public murals produced through collaboration with local artists. Client: City of Long Beach Role: Conceptual Design, Community Outreach, Construction Documentation, Permitting Duration: 2017 - current Key Staff: Kirk Keller, Moiri Fleming Reference: Chris Koontz, Director of Development Services Christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov562.570.6288 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 16 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 17 Studio One Eleven provided placemaking, landscape architecture, and urban design services for the sustainable redevelopment of Artsakh Avenue. The project includes reclaiming valuable yet underutilized space in the downtown to create a dynamic, vibrant, public open space that supports the City’s desire for a world-class Arts and Entertainment District. Our design approach utilizes people-first streetscape improvements and a whimsical, artistic overlay to create a destination on Artsakh Avenue that links to other activities in the area, encouraging visitors to stroll, explore and discover the unique offerings of the downtown Arts and Entertainment District. The design and programming also celebrate local art and existing museums, and activation of the street edges by revitalizing commercial spaces on the ground floor of buildings and the facades of two existing public parking garages. Studio One Eleven led the design team as prime consultant from concept and community outreach through full documentation and permitting. The project turns Artsakh Avenue into a one-way street with a chicane to slow traffic and promotes pedestrian activity with extended sidewalks, shade trees, outdoor dining plazas, built-in site furnishings, environmental art and graphics. Currently out to Bid. Client: City of Glendale Role: PRIME - Conceptual Design, Community Outreach, Design Development, Construction Documentation, Specifications, Permitting. Construction Administration Key Staff: Alan Pullman, Kirk Keller, & Shruti Shankar Duration: 2019 - current Reference: Sarkis Oganesyan, PE, PTOE City of Glendale, Deputy Director of Public Works 909.395.2295, soganesyan@glendaleca.gov Glendale and Arts & Entertainment District Visioning Glendale, CA Placemaking and public realm design for Glendale’s Downtown Arts and Entertainment District George Washington Carver Park, formerly Willowbrook Park, honors the legacy of George Washington Carver, a renowned African American scientist, educator, and inventor. The $1.5 million playground renovation draws inspiration from the farming fields and crops Mr. Carver championed, such as peanuts, sweet potatoes, and soybeans. This thoughtful design not only celebrates Carver’s contributions to agriculture but also fosters an engaging and educational environment for children. It connects them to the history and significance of his work while celebrating Willowbrook’s agrarian heritage. The renovation includes all new play equipment and surfacing, accessibility improvements, lighting, site furnishings, planting, and stormwater upgrades. The organic forms and layout of the playground design supports a series of multi-sensory spaces and activities. This playground has been honored as a Project of Excellence within the National Demonstration Site (NDS) Network, reflecting commitment to promoting physical activity through active play and encouraging the developmental progression of skills through healthy movement. This project was designed, documented and constructed in parallel with East Rancho Dominguez Park renovation, also led by Studio One Eleven Client: County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation Role: PRIME - Conceptual Design, Construction Documentation, Specifications, Permitting, Construction Administration/Observation Key Staff: Kirk Keller, Albert Hernandez, Christian Nunez Duration: 2023 - 2024 Reference: Jorge Gutierrez, PLA, Section Head County of Los Angeles Dept. of Parks & Recreation, 626.588.5325, jgutierrez2@parks.lacounty.gov Celebrating Agricultural Heritage Through Play and Learning George Washington Carver Park Renovation Los Angeles, California Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 18 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 19 Studio One Eleven is leading the revitalization of Corona’s primary commercial corridor by transforming it into a vibrant and active streetscape. This project positions public infrastructure investments as a powerful catalyst for fostering community and economic benefits while celebrating the city’s unique identity. The design emphasizes improved walkability and comfort through widened sidewalks, shade trees, and decorative paving, creating a more inviting pedestrian environment. Urban greening initiatives incorporate drought-tolerant landscaping and innovative green infrastructure to enhance sustainability and manage stormwater effectively. To prioritize safety and accessibility, traffic-calming measures include redesigned intersections with bulb-outs, enhanced crosswalks, and adjusted lanes for pedestrians and cyclists. Community-driven art installations and culturally significant signage are seamlessly integrated, reflecting Corona’s rich heritage and creating a cohesive identity. Additionally, the project supports economic activation by introducing spaces for outdoor dining, community events, and local commerce, fostering increased foot traffic and supporting local businesses. Together, these efforts aim to redefine 6th Street as the vibrant heart of the city. The project is currently in Schematic Design. Client: City of Corona Role: PRIME - Conceptual Design, Design Development, Construction Documentation, Specifications, Permitting, ,Construction Administration Key Staff: Kirk Keller, Jitka Dekojova, and Moiri Fleming Duration: 2024 - current Reference: Keegan Olds, PE, CIP Supervisor, City of Corona Public Works, Keegan.Olds@coronaca.gov, 951.739.4977 6th Street Beautification Corona, CA Revitalizing the Heart of Corona: Transforming 6th Street into a Connected, Vibrant, and Cohesive Community Corridor. Studio One Eleven served as Urban and Architectural Design consultant for the Epicenter Masterplan Plan adopted in December 2023. The new masterplan envisions the Epicenter Master Plan Area as a fun, active district serving as a destination for recreation, entertainment, and gathering. Aiming to provide for development opportunities for intensification around the Cucamonga Station and Epicenter Sports Complex to evolve the area into a significant, transit- oriented, mixed-use urban center and regional hub. Client: Sargent Town Planning Role: Urban and Architectural Design Duration: August 2022 - December 2023 Key Staff: Michael Bohn, David Sabunas, Matthew Wister Reference: David Sargent, Senior Principal, Sargent Town Planning, dsargent@sargenttownplanning.com, 213.328.2600 add info Epicenter Master Plan Rancho Cucamonga, CA An urban design masterplan transforming the Epicenter into a vibrant, transit-oriented destination for recreation, entertainment, and community. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 20 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 21 A world-class exhibit space on the third level of their newly completed headquarters office building on Ocean Boulevard. The existing floor was a largely unimproved office space of approximately 23,000 sf, with the Port looking to transform half this area into a new exhibition hall from which to showcase their recently completed and planned advancements in technology and sustainability, while also telling the story of the Port and its positive impacts on local communities and global commerce. Studio One Eleven acted as lead design architect in collaboration with Lord Cultural Resources and Tessellate Studio in developing exhibit content programming and exhibit design. The Port of Long Beach Interactive Education Center is scheduled for completion in Q1 of 2024. Client: City of Long Beach Role: Architecture Key Staff: Scott Parker, Matt Wister Duration: 2021 - 2024 Reference: Jamilla Vollman, Capital Projects Coordinator - Program Management Division, Port of Long Beach, 562.283.7387, jamilla.vollmann@polb.com Port of Long Beach Long Beach, CA An interactive exhibit space highlighting the Port of Long Beach’s advancements in technology, sustainability, and global impact The California Department of Housing and Community Development has determined that cities in Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties need to increase their housing supply by over 1.3 million units by October 2029. For jurisdictions in these counties, which make up the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region, this housing shortage and determination has necessitated finding innovative ways to increase housing supply. The built-out nature of Southern California communities is often a barrier to adding more housing in the region, creating challenges for many cities looking to achieve their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) targets. To address this challenge, a multifaceted team of planners from SCAG, Dudek and Studio One Eleven, as well as graduate students from USC’s Sol Price School of Public Policy, collaborated to produce the “Other-to-Residential Toolkit (Toolkit),” a graphically rich, user-friendly guide to catalyze conversion of existing underutilized sites to housing. The Toolkit supports policymakers and agency staff in the SCAG region to think creatively about ways to streamline regulatory processes, incentivize a variety of types of housing development, and address barriers and challenges to conversion of sites in actionable ways. Residential conversion is related to smart growth, and the Toolkit also serves as a guide for new sustainable development that supports not only an increase in the housing supply, but also the creation of more walkable, vibrant, and healthy communities. Client: SCAG Role: Architectural Services, Urban Design Services Key Staff: Alan Pullman - Principal-in-Charge, Shruti Shankar- Urban Design Director Duration: 2020 Client Reference: David Kyobe, Southern California Council of Governments, (SCAG), 213.236.1800, kyobe@scag.ca.gov Other-to-Residential Toolkit SCAG Region, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 22 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 23 The City of Anaheim has envisioned Store One, a Food Services Incubator and Job Training Center, to support the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and provide upward mobility opportunities in one of the City’s most disadvantaged communities. Located in the original Northgate González Market, the building’s former use serves as the inspiration for the future food and entrepreneurship programming. Studio One eleven was engaged by the City of Anaheim to collaborate with community stakeholders, City staff and Culinary Lab to create a vision with great community benefits. Through this visioning process a program to develop culinary and small business skills in local youth was realized, coupled with a space for community gatherings and organic gardening. Client: City of Anaheim Role: Architectural Services, Landscape Architectural Services Key Staff: Alan Pullman - Principal-in-Charge, Matt Wister - Project Director Maria Setaro, - Project Manager, Reed Suzuki - Project Architect, Brian Hardy - Job Captain Duration: 2018 - ongoing, Construction Start Est. 2025 Client Reference: Grace Stepter, City of Anaheim & Community Development, GStepter@anaheim.net, 714.765.4315 Store One Anaheim, CA Steelcratf Garden Grove (SCGG) is 20,000-square-foot, al-fresco, neighborhood dining experience, the first of its kind in Orange County. 24 repurposed cargo containers are positioned around communal eating areas on a 1.8-acre lot along with a performance stage, children’s play area, co-working space, upper-level patio, retro video-game arcade, pop-up retail and an organic garden. The site was a former vacant lot adjacent to City Hall. Built in 2019, SCGG provided relief during the pandemic for people to go out to eat, stay social and local. Over the past few years, it has become a well loved meeting point to bring diverse communities together centered around food, beverage and community events. Beer hall bench seating is intended to inspire social situations. Serving as a catalyst for the downtown, SteelCraft Bellflower offers a food hall and beer garden under a barn- inspired shade structure, utilizing repurposed shipping containers as the building shell. The project design evokes the city’s strong dairy roots and includes a large performance stage, vertical surface to project movies and passive children play area. Located in the heart of the city’s downtown, the location has become a key anchor for attracting visitors resulting in further public investment in the core. Over the past few years, it has become a well loved meeting point centered around food, beverage and community events. Client: Howard CDM Role: Site Planning, Architecture and Landscape Architecture Key Staff: Michael Bohn, Kirk Keller Duration: 2017 - 2020 Client Reference: Martin Howard, mhoward@howardcdm.com 562.427.4124 A Shipping Container Food Halls For Independent Retailers that Encourages Social Cohesion and Boosts Local Economies SteelCraft Experiences Garden Grove and Bellflower, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 24 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 25 Section 4.5: Third Party / Subconsultant List This adaptive reuse and addition seeks to create a cohesive community center for Centro CHA reflective of a rich and vibrant Latino culture. It is to be both a physical and metaphorical beacon to the surrounding community that it serves. The project program consists of administrative offices to assist the community with Immigration legal services, business development, youth and workforce development. The project includes, a lobby-art gallery and gift shop will support local Latino artists and youth art programs, a multi-purpose room for larger community functions and classes, and a Teaching Kitchen for culinary arts training and job placement. The functional strategy was to place the smaller more flexible program in the existing structure to avoid costly modifications to the existing building. Client: City of Huntington Beach Role: Architecture, Landscape Architecture Key Staff: Alan Pullman, Matt Wister, Maria Setaro, Reed Suzuki, Brian Hardy Duration: 2020- ongoing Construction Start Est. TBD Reference: Eric Lopez, Public Works, eric.lopez@longbeach.gov 562.570.6383 Centro CHA Long Beach, CA An adaptive reuse project creating a vibrant cultural hub with services, art, and community spaces. We view every project as an opportunity to create spaces that connect with nature Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 26 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 27 9931 Muirlands Blvd. Irvine, CA 92618 Contact: Victor Leon, PE, LEED AP Founded in 1981, RTM has since evolved into a nationwide leader in the engineering industry. With strategically located offices across the country and licensure in all 50 states, RTM is renowned for its provision of Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing (MEP), Civil, and Structural engineering services. Despite its expansive reach, the firm maintains an unwavering commitment to nurturing local relationships and establishing deep connections with clients. RTM fosters an environment of knowledge sharing, empowering its teams to develop expertise across various markets and disciplines. The firm’s reputation is built on practical experience, continuous education, and ample opportunities for career advancement. They go beyond traditional boundaries, striving to align with the goals, processes, and individuals involved in each project. By thoroughly understanding their clients, RTM delivers tailored solutions for projects of any scope and type. RTM has worked with Studio One Eleven on as MEP engineer on numerous public park, community center renovations and streetscape projects within Los Angeles County. RTM has worked with Studio One Eleven on as MEP engineer on numerous public parks open spaces, community center renovations and streetscape projects within Los Angeles County. FIRM PROFILE - RTM Lighting and Electrical Arroyo Irrigation is an irrigation consulting firm which specializes in irrigation design, irrigation auditing and water management services. The firm is unique with one foot in the office/design space and its other foot in field/water management space, as this allows Arroyo to implement proven effective water saving solutions. Founded by Garry Collins, ASIC, CLIA, Water Sense Partner, the firm’s primary focus is to provide efficient irrigation solutions, while presenting clients with the highest levels of customer service. We have successfully built a strong working relationship with Arroyo Irrigation through collaboration on several parks and open space projects FIRM PROFILE - ARROYO Irrigation Design 13660 Gershon Pl, North Tustin, Ca 92705 Contact: Garry Collins, Principal 3257 East Guasti Road, Suite 300. Ontario, CA 91761 Contact: Steve Ellis, PE, Principal/Regional Manager Fuscoe Engineering is headquartered in Irvine and has been providing services for projects there since the late 1980’s. The Fuscoe team has engineered hundreds of projects in the city of Irvine, ranging from master planned communities, residential housing and mixed-use developments to neighborhood parks, athletic fields, schools, churches and streetscapes. Notable clients include the City of Irvine, Irvine Company Apartment Communities, Irvine Unified School District, The Irvine Company, Brookfield Residential, The New Home Company, Alliance Residential, Irvine Ranch Water District, Lennar and many others. Our services include civil engineering, survey and mapping, stormwater management and geospatial technology. We approach every assignment with full circle thinking® – our way of bringing alert, inventive and complete thoughtfulness to engineering. We consider the entire life-cycle of our work so the outcome is sustainable both environmentally, as well as economically. Guided by full circle thinking®, we are able to attract, keep and grow outstanding people while maintaining longstanding relationships with our clients and community. It’s our character that reflects who we really are – capable professionals who care about our team, our clients and our community. Studio One Eleven and Fuscoe Engineering haved collaborated on numerous streetscape projects including most recently the Artsakh Ave Arts and Entertainment District in Glendale and current collaboration on the 6th Street Beautification project in Corona. FIRM PROFILE - FUSCOE Civil Engineer RLB is a premier construction consultancy firm and trusted strategic advisor, boasting a rich legacy spanning over two centuries. Our dedicated team excels in customizing services to align with client objectives, specializing in project controls encompassing time, cost, scope, and quality. We prioritize knowledge sharing and collaboration to drive industry-wide enhancements, embracing cutting- edge technology for data-driven, transparent projects. We are committed to delivering value by combining expertise in cost modeling, human and social value creation, and environmental impact assessment, ultimately empowering clients to achieve optimal value solutions for their projects. RLB has provided cost management consultancy services to Studio One Eleven as far back as 2006 and most recently has an ongoing relationship providing cost estimates for public parks and streetscapes across the Greater Los Angeles area. FIRM PROFILE - RLB Cost Estimating The Bloc 700 South Flower Street, Suite 630 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Contact: Ning Li, MRICS, PMP, Cost Manager Third-Party / Subcontractors Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 28 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 29 Langan provides an integrated mix of engineering and environmental consulting services in support of land development projects, corporate real estate portfolios, and the energy and renewables industry. Our clients include public agencies, developers, property owners, corporations, institutions, and energy companies around the world. Our team has worked on numerous transportation improvement projects, including roadways, bridges, intersections, and pedestrian facilities in urban, rural, and suburban environments. We are dedicated to safety and sustainability and have expertise in traffic analysis and transportation planning, making us a trusted partner for clients looking to enhance the mobility and accessibility of their communities. Our expertise ranges from environmental engineering and geotechnical analysis to landscape architecture and traffic engineering. We ensure compliance and safety in regulated building materials, and our geologists contribute essential insights for site evaluation and foundation planning. We are dedicated to excellence in all aspects, committed to helping our clients achieve their project objectives with precision and innovation, while prioritizing sustainability and safety. Langan has worked with Studio One Eleven on multiple public park projects within Los Angeles County and two National Register of Historic Places site in Long Beach to provide geotechnical engineering design services. Across our global partnership of experts, clients and communities, Jensen Hughes is recognized worldwide for our leadership in fire protection engineering, a legacy of responsibility we have advanced with pride since 1939. Today, our expertise extends broadly across closely related risk management fields — from accessibility consulting, risk and hazard analysis, process safety and forensic investigations to security risk consulting, emergency management and digital innovation. As we champion best practices, set industry standards and support communities with innovative solutions, we are making the world a better place. At Jensen Hughes, we are passionate about making our world safe, secure and resilient. With over 1,500 engineers, consultants, analysts and strategists drawing upon a powerful platform of expertise, experience and perspectives, we provide state-of-the-art solutions that not only answer the needs of our clients across a wide range of markets but also help make a real difference within the communities and industries we serve. From government, healthcare, science and technology to energy, mission critical and transportation, we support thousands of clients and have completed over 40,000 projects worldwide, driving positive change for a more equitable and sustainable future. Moreover, we strive to create a culture of trust, integrity, and inclusion that supports innovation and growth for our team members, clients and industry. FIRM PROFILE - LANGAN Geotechnical Engineering FIRM PROFILE - JENSEN HUGHES Engineering 13660 Gershon Pl, North Tustin, CA 92705 Contact: Diane Fiorelli, PE, GE 13660 Gershon Pl, North Tustin, CA 92705 Contact: Diane Fiorelli, PE, GE Subconsultants References Contact Contact Contact Contact Contact Contact Address Address Address Address Address Address Email Email Email Email Email Email Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Troy Strange Desert Recreation District Timothy Wassil City of Indio Bryan McKinney City of La Quinta Tim Iverson City of Westlake Village Robert Nava County of Los Angeles Lorry Hempe City of Los Alamitos 45-305 Oasis Street, Indio, CA 92201 100 Civic Center Drive, Indio, CA 92201 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 31200 Oak Crest Drive Westlake Village CA 91361 500 W. Temple St., Room 358, Los Angeles, CA 90012 3191 Katella Ave. Los Alamitos, CA 90720 tstrange@drd.us.com twassil@indio.org bmckinney@laquintaca.gov tim@wlv.org RNava@parks.lacounty.gov lhempe@cityoflosalamitos.org 760.541.4174 760.391.4018 760.777.7045 818.706.1613 626.588.5349 310.916.4620 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 30 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 31 Subconsultants References Contact Contact Contact Address Address Address Email Email Email Phone Phone Phone Tatiana Holden, PE Deputy Public Works Director, City of Calabasas Alex Mikhailpoor, PE Civil Engineer, County of LA Public Works Ulises Benavente Associate Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 100 Civic Center Way, Calabasas, CA 91302 500 W. Temple St., Room 358, Los Angeles, CA 90012 10500 Civic Center Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 tholden@cityofcalabasas.com AMikhailpoor@dpw.lacounty.gov Ulises.Benavente@cityofrc.us 818.224.1600 626.588.5349 310.916.4620 Contact Contact Contact Address Address Address Email Email Email Phone Phone Phone Cheri Blatner Pifer Senior Associate KTUA Planning & Landscape Architecture Eric Randolph Senior Project Manager, Principal, POPULOUS David Graue, AVP, AIA, LEED AP, Los Angeles Studio Leader, HNTB Architecture 3916 Normal St, San Diego, CA 92103, United States The Bradbury Building 304 S Broadway Los Angeles, CA 90013 777 S. Figueroa Street Suite 2300 Los Angeles, California 90017 cheri@ktua.comgov eric.randolph@populous.com dgraue@hntb.com 619.294.4477 310.651.0899 310.980.9925 Subconsultants References Contact Contact Contact Address Address Address Email Email Email Phone Phone Phone Mike McAndrew, Project Architect, Bastien and Associates, Inc. David Frey, FAIA, LEED AP, DBIA, Senior Principal, Technical Principal, HOK Mark Meyer Senior Project Manager Corsini Stark Architects 2 Corporate Park ste 110, Irvine, CA 92606, United States 757 South Alameda Street Suite 400 Los Angeles, California 90021 3630 Tyburn St, Los Angeles, CA 90065 mmcandrew@ bastienarchitects.com david.frey@hok.com mark@corsinistark.com 714.617.8600 415.309.4233 323.255.9100 ext 1007 Contact Contact Contact Address Address Address Email Email Email Phone Phone Phone Adolfo Acosta, Grading Division Chief, City of Los Angeles, Deparment of Building and Safety – Grading Division Jose Urquizo Los Angeles County Public Works Jeff Laros, Vice President Mill Creek Residential 221 N. Figueroa Street, 12 Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 900 S Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite #205, San Diego, CA 92122 jesus.acosta@lacity.org jurquizo@dpw.lacounty.gov jlarosa@mcrtrust.com 213.482.6967 626.458.7978 714.299.4556 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 32 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 33 STEVE ELLIS, PE Principal/Regional Manager Ontario, CA Steve is a Fuscoe Engineering Principal and the Regional Director in charge of overseeing Fuscoe’s Inland Empire office, located in Ontario. He has over 30 years of civil engineering experience throughout Southern California with both public and private projects. Steve’s has an extensive background with public project work, master plans and residential communities, medical/institutional assignments and commercial/industrial developments. Additionally, under Steve’s management, the Inland Empire office has completed work on over 100 schools throughout Southern California. Steve has provided services for numerous clients, including Greystar, HMC Architects, Kaiser Permanente, Cannon Design, Costco Wholesale, The Boureston Companies, National CORE, Brookfield Residential and Trammell Crow. Steve’s years of engineering experience, coupled with a broad knowledge of project goals and execution, are strong individual assets. He possesses excellent interpersonal skills and coordinates project requirements easily with both clients and public agencies. Steve has the ability to handle multiple projects successfully, and his commitment to project goals and budgeting results in overwhelming client satisfaction. EDUCATION ›BS, Civil Engineering California Polytechnical Institute, Pomona REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS ›PE, 1992 - CA #47255 AFFILIATIONS ›Building Industry Association of Southern California ›Community College Facility Coalition (CCFC) ›Coalition for Adequate Student Housing (CASH) ›Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) Fuscoe Team Member Since 1998 Fuscoe Principal Since 2007 Selected Projects • Cypress Community College Student Housing Project, Cypress, CA • CSU Fullerton KHS Swimming Pool, Fullerton, CA • CSU Los Angeles Geotechnical Services, Los Angeles, CA -Student Housing and Dining Facility -Parking Structure -Athletic Field Building • Clark County School District - Treem Elementary Athletic Court Replacement, Henderson, NV • Southern Nevada Vocational Technical Center, NV • On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services, City of Irvine, CA • On-Call Peer Review Services, City of Anaheim, CA • On-Call Utility Location Services, Port of Long Beach, CA • Los Angeles Chargers Training Facility, Costa Mesa, CA • Geotechnical Investigation for Hillside Residence, Anaheim, CA • Geotechnical Investigation for Hillside Residence, Corona Del Mar, CA • Geotechnical Due Diligence for Proposed Apartments, Anaheim, CA • Geotechnical Investigation for Apartment Complex Expansion, Fullerton, CA • Canyon Crest Development Geotechnical Peer Review, Brea, CA • Residential Environmental Due Diligence Support, Fullerton, CA • Park Plaza Geotechnical Investigation, Huntington Beach, CA • Brea Place, Brea, CA • Ventana Mixed-Use Development, Fullerton, CA • Audie Murphy Ranch Master Planned Community, Menifee, CA • Veterans Affairs Hospital Los Angeles Solar Parking, Los Angeles, CA • Del Valle Fire Training Facility, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Castaic, CA • BMO Stadium, Expo Park, Los Angeles, CA Diane Fiorelli has over 23 years of experience providing integrated site/civil, geotechnical, and environmental services throughout the United States and abroad. Diane is a licensed geotechnical engineer in California; and a registered professional engineer in California, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho and New York. She graduated with a Master’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley in 2000 where she focused on geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. She has volunteered for number of years for the Deep Foundation Institute Seismic and Lateral Load Committee and in the past has served on the Structural Engineering Association of Southern California Foundation Committee. Current Availability • 40-50% Education • M.S., Civil Engineering (Geoenvironmental), University of California, Berkeley • B.S., Civil Engineering, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Years of Experience: • Total: 23 • Langan: 23 Professional Registration • Professional Engineer (PE) in CA, AZ, NV, NY, and ID • Geotechnical Engineer (GE) CA • LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP) • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSD/QSP) Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers • Deep Foundation Institute • Urban Land Institute Diane Fiorelli PE, GE Principal/Vice President Project Role: Principal-in-Charge Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 34 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 35 Rider Levett Bucknall | Statement of Qualifications Years of Experience: 36 years Office Location: Los Angeles, CA Academic Qualifications: Bachelor of Science in Construction Economy, Nanjing Technical University, Nanjing, China Master of Business Administration, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China Professional Qualifications: Member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (MRICS) Project Management Professional (PMP), Project Management Institute NING LI MRICS, PMP COST MANAGER Ning Li is a seasoned cost manager at RLB’s Los Angeles office, with decades of expertise in cost estimation and management. His extensive background includes overseeing cost estimation, monitoring, bid analysis, and contract and change order review, as well as forecasting for projects in the multifamily residential, retail, hospitality, and higher education sectors. Ning’s deep experience in these areas not only ensures precise and strategic cost management but also enhances the efficiency and success of complex projects. Project Experience: 280 7th Street, San Francisco, CA 400 Logue Avenue, Mountain View, CA 1721 15th Street, San Francisco, CA Artsakh Avenue Improvements, Glendale, CA Cincinnati Convention Center - Cost Estimator & Owner Support, Cincinnati, OH City of Avondale Police Communications Bureau Remodel, Avondale, AZ City of Paso Robles Law Enforcement Facilities, Paso Robles, CA City of Scottsdale Jail and Police Renovation, Scottsdale, AZ Costa Palmas M11, M13, and Aman Phase 2, Costa Palmas, Mexico Costa Palmas M13 Four Seasons Golf Club, Costa Palmas, Mexico Cultural Terrace Complex Reuse at Orange County Great Park, Orange County, CA CSU Fullerton New Center for Leadership Dillard University Residence Hall, New Orleans, LA East Rancho Dominguez Park Playground Replacement Project, Compton, CA El Rancho High School Sports Field, Stadium, and Aquatics Facility, Pico Rivera, CA GS E&C Redlands Single Family Homes, Redlands, CA LAUSD Outdoor Learning Environment Planning Templates, Los Angeles, CA LAX Southwest Airlines 3rd Party Cost Estimate Review and Validation, Los Angeles, CA Newton Building Demolition and Parking Expansion Northeast Metropolitan Regional Technical High School, Wakefield MA Ruben Salazar Memorial County Park, Los Angeles, CA San Diego Facilities Assessment, San Diego, CA South Padre Island Convention Center, South Padre Island, TX Store One – Food Incubator & Job Training Center, Anaheim, CA RESUMEVictor Leon, P.E., LEED AP Principal / Electrical EDUCATION College of the Desert, Engineering, Palm Desert, CA REGISTRATIONS Licensed Professional Engineer in Arizona and California (No. E23782) LEED Accredited Professional RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Palm Springs Downtown Park, Palm Springs, CA. Redevelopment of a 2-acre community park. Scope of work includes electrical power and lighting for the main park and public restrooms to facilitate normal and special event requirements, as well as power for all signage throughout the park. Additionally, mechanical exhaust systems for new restrooms and storage rooms, as well as plumbing for restroom fixtures and hot/cold water systems were designed. Mission Springs Park, Desert Hot Springs, CA. The project included the electrical engineering for a 12.5-acre soccer sports park which included parking lot lighting, pathway lighting, and sports field lighting. An electrical service with distribution to serve the concession building and all lighting. Laguna Beach Village Entrance, Laguna Beach, CA. Renovations to the existing entrance of Laguna Beach Village. The project included landscape/aesthetic enhancement; parking and circulation improvements; enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle connectivity; historic digester exterior improvements; and median improvements. The electrical scope of work included a new electrical service that served the entire site; lighting design for the parking lot, walkways, and landscape area; power distribution for amenity buildings. Downtown Palm Canyon Road, Master Lighting Plan, Palm Springs, CA. Renovation of the existing streetscape and landscape lighting. Jackson Street Median Island Improvements, Indio, CA. New electrical and lighting design for median island landscape areas. Palm & Pierson Streetscape Improvements, Desert Hot Springs, CA. New electrical and lighting design for streetscape, landscape and intersection areas. Tahquitz Median Island Improvements, Palm Springs, CA. New electrical and lighting design for median island landscape areas. White Water Park, Rancho Mirage, CA. The project included the electrical engineering for a 6-acre park which included general lighting, sports lighting and pathway lighting. An electrical service with distribution to serve the restroom buildings and sports lighting. Pathway lighting was designed with off-grid photovoltaic (PV) lighting. BACKGROUND Victor’s extensive portfolio demonstrates his proficiency in providing electrical engineering and lighting design services across a wide variety of projects. He assumes a leadership role in strategically planning and selecting electrical and lighting systems for these endeavors, showcasing his expertise in these critical areas. Victor is known for his proactive coordination across multiple disciplines, ensuring seamless collaboration and maintaining stringent quality control over all projects. As Principal, Victor excels in project management, providing valuable mentoring to his team, and driving business development initiatives. His dedication to cultivating and nurturing client relationships is evident as he consistently exceeds expectations in design excellence and project delivery. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 5 years with RTM 25 years total MARKET EXPERTISE Parks & Recreation Municipal Multi-Family Healthcare CONTACT victor.leon@rtmec.com Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 36 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 37 jensenhughes.com Copyright ©2025 Jensen Hughes, Inc. All Rights Reserved. T0123 ASHLEY PITTS AIA, NCARB, CASp, APAC-BE PROJECT ROLE: ACCESSIBILITY CONSULTANT Experience – 30 years | Joined Jensen Hughes – 2012 Bio Ashley has three decades of experience providing accessibility consulting for various project types, including assembly and hospitality. She has extensive experience helping clients navigate the overlapping laws, codes, standards and initiatives related to accessibility. She specializes in design peer reviews and support, assessing existing facilities and conducting construction inspections. Project Highlights CITY OF MOAB, UT Accessibility Consultant. Provided accessibility plan review services to ensure the construction documents complied with the adopted building codes, including state and local amendments for various projects. CITY + COUNTY OF DENVER (CCD), ROSEDALE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, DENVER, CO Project Manager. Provided accessibility code consulting services. This project involved renovating the existing buildings at the Rosedale Parks Maintenance Facility and constructing a new office building for the Parks Department’s Southwest District headquarters. CCD, ACCESSIBILITY INTEGRATED CONTRACT, DENVER, CO Project Manager. Provided accessibility reviews of design and construction for accessibility corrections for the following projects: the Webb Building, the Lindsey-Flanigan Courthouse, the East Side Office Building, and the Denver Animal Shelter. CCD, CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION, DENVER, CO Project Manager. Providing third-party accessibility consulting services on behalf of the municipality for the large convention center expansion project. The project is set to be an 80,000-square-foot, column-free multi- function space that includes 19 subdivisions of varying sizes. Education M. Arch., University of Colorado, 1999 B. EnvD., University of Colorado, 1995 Registrations Registered Architect (RA): CO Certifications CA, Certified Access Specialist (CASp), No. CASp-676 National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), No. 75510 Accessibility Professionals Association Certified, Built Environment (APAC-BE), No. 0049 Associations Member, American Institute of Architects (AIA) Member, Accessibility Professionals Association (APA) Member, Certified Access Specialist Institute (CASI) Contact +1 720 499 1595 apitts@jensenhughes.com AArrrrooyyoo IIrrrriiggaattiioonn 13660 Gershon Place, Santa Ana, Ca 92705 ArroyoIrrigation.com • Tel: 949.430.7030 Gcollins@ ArroyoIrrigation.com Garry Collins PRINCIPAL | ARROYO IRRIGATION Mr. Collins has a Bachelor of Science in Landscape Irrigation Science from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He is an award-winning Professional Irrigation Consultant (PIC) with The American Society of Irrigation Consultants (ASIC). He is a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) with the Irrigation Association (IA) and was a Certified Backflow Tester. Garry excels in the following areas: irrigation design, water management, irrigation auditing and construction management. Mr. Collins has been in the landscape industry for 20 years. EDUCATION California Polytechnic State University, Pomona • Bachelor of Science in Landscape Irrigation Science PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Irrigation Associate (IA) • Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) American Society of Irrigation Consultants (ASIC) • Professional Irrigation Consultant (PIC) NOTABLE PROJECTS PARKS Whittier Narrow Recreation Area | South El Monte, California Rancho Vista Park| Palmdale, California Beaumont Sports Park| Beaumont, California Courson Park | Palmdale, California Deleo Sports Park | Riverside County, California Marina Park | Ventura, California COMMUNITIES Esencia | Rancho Mission Viejo, California Sendero | Rancho Mission Viejo, California Ladera Ranch | Ladera Ranch, California The Blackstone Community | Brea, California La Floresta Community | Brea, California COMMERCIAL Clinton Keith Marketplace| Wildomar, California Hoag RMV | Rancho Mission Viejo, California Toyota Design Head Quarters | Newport Beach, California Cal Neva | Tahoe, California San Diego Temple | San Diego, California Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 38 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 39 Staff Resumes and Organization Chart SUB-CONSULTANT TEAM Selected Projects • Cypress Community College Student Housing Project, Cypress, CA • CSU Fullerton KHS Swimming Pool, Fullerton, CA • CSU Los Angeles Geotechnical Services, Los Angeles, CA -Student Housing and Dining Facility -Parking Structure -Athletic Field Building • Clark County School District - Treem • Geotech Residenc • Geotech Propose • Geotech Apartme Fullerton • Canyon C Geotech Resident Diane Fiorelli has over 23 years of experience providing geotechnical, and environmental services throughout th Diane is a licensed geotechnical engineer in California; a engineer in California, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho and New Master’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University 2000 where she focused on geotechnical and geoenviro volunteered for number of years for the Deep Foundatio Load Committee and in the past has served on the Struc Southern California Foundation Committee. Current Availability • 40-50% Education • M.S., Civil Engineering (Geoenvironmental), University of California, Berkeley • B.S., Civil Engineering, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Years of Experience: • Total: 23 • Langan: 23 Professional Registration • Professional Engineer (PE) in CA, AZ, NV, NY, and ID • Geotechnical Engineer (GE) CA • LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP) • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Qualified SWPPP Practitioner Diane Fiorelli PE, GE Principal/Vice President Project Role: Principal-in-Charge Kirk Keller, ASLA, LEED AP Principal in Charge 25 years experience Moiri Fleming, ASLA Project Landscape Architect 16 years experience Scott Parker. RA Design Director 25+ years experience Ryan Caldera, AIA Senior Project Manager 20+ years experience Jennifer Nguyen Design Manager 10 years experience Civil Engineering Fuscoe Engineering Steve Ellis, PE 30+ years experience Irrigation Design ARROYO Garry Collins, Principal 20 years experience Electrical Engineering RTM Victor Leon, PE, LEED AP 25 years experience Geotechnical Engineering LANGAN Diane Fiorelli, PE, GE 23 years experience Cost Estimating Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) Ning Li, MRICS, PMP 36 years experience Engineering Jensen Hughes Ashley Pitts, MS, AIA, Senior Accessibility Principal Shruti Shankar, AICP, Int. Assoc. AIA Urban Design Director 14 years experience Michael Bohn, AIA Partner 35+ years experience PRIME CONSULTANT Studio One Eleven Jitka Dekojova, ASLA, LEED SITES Project Manager 12 years experience Landscape Architecture ArchitectureSection 4.6: Staff Resumes and Organization Chart We transform spaces into environmentally responsible and thriving places Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 40 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 41 Education • Bachelor of Science, Landscape Architecture with Honors, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY • Heriot-Watt University, Landscape Architecture III, Edinburgh, Scotland Awards • ASLA Nevada Project of the Year - The Urban Green, 2023 • ASLA Merit Award, The Oaks School Greenspace, 2023 • APA Los Angeles Merit Award, Downtown Mar Vista Beautification Project, 2022 • Santa Ana Arts Collective, 2021: - AIA OC Honor Award - AIA Long Beach, South Bay Honor Award SCDF, Honor Award • ASLA Honor Award Paramount Blvd. Urban Revitalization, 2021 • ASLA Merit Award Steelcraft Garden Grove, 2021 • The Roost, Santa Ana, CA: 2019 AIA Long Beach/South Bay Merit Award, 2017 SCDF Architecture Award • ACE 121: 2018 National Association of Homebuilders Multifamily Pillars Award, 2018 SCDF Citation Award • ASLA Merit Award 2018, The Roost, EcoHouse, Long Beach Parklet Program • RDC-S111, Inc. Office: 2018 Architecture MasterPrize Honorable Mention, 2017 AIA Long Beach/South Bay Award; 2017 USGBC 1st Place in Health + Wellness; 2017 Architects Newspaper Design Award, Honorable Mention; 2017 SCDF Architecture Award; 2017 LEED Platinum; 2017 WELL Certified Kirk Keller, ASLA, LEED AP Principal, Landscape Architecture Relevant Experience • George Washington Carver Park, Los Angeles, CA • East Rancho Dominguez Park, Los Angeles, CA • Progress Park and Paramount Civic Center renovation, Paramount, CA • Rancho Los Cerritos Innovative Stormwater, Long Beach, CA • The Urban Green, Reno, NV • Gardendale Pocket Park, Paramount, CA • Long Beach Airport Expansion + Gardens, Long Beach, CA • Overlook at Rise Park, Irvine, CA • MOLAA Demonstration Botanical Garden, Long Beach • Oak View Neighborhood Beautification, Huntington Beach, CA • Paramount Boulevard Urban Revitalization, Paramount, CA • HMP Park + Equality Plaza, Long Beach, CA • The Streets, Long Beach, CA • Glendale Arts and Entertainment District, Glendale, CA • Huntington Beach Main Street Redesign, Huntington Beach, CA • The Oaks School Greenspace, Los Angeles, CA • EcoHouse Play Yard, Long Beach • Western Gage Park, Los Angeles, CA • Parklets + Al Fresco Dining, Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego County Kirk Keller, ASLA is Principal and Director of Landscape Architecture at Studio One Eleven with focus on sustainable public realm and urban development projects. He brings over 25 years of experience in facilitating successful outcomes, working directly in partnership with city agencies, community groups and other organizations to design and implement small and large-scale projects with specific, unique identities. Kirk provides a wealth of knowledge on best practices, innovative design and leadership of public realm projects, from Urban Parks and Streetscapes, to Adaptive Re-use developments and community improvement projects throughout Southern California. He is well-versed in organizing and leading project teams in the completion of a given project and is actively involved in all phases of projects. Kirk’s current work includes multiple parks and streetscape renovation projects in Los Angeles including 6th Street Revitalization in Corona, the Paramount Civic Center Plaza & fountain renovation, the Rancho Los Cerritos stormwater reclamation project in Long Beach, and the Oak View Neighborhood Beautification project in Huntington Beach for which he led the design and creative community out reach efforts. He has also been directing the Long Beach Airport + garden expansion project, Glendale Arts and Entertainment District, the renovation of The Streets in Long Beach and various Parklet Pilot Programs and tactical urbanism initiatives. Kirk is a licensed landscape architect in California, Nevada and Texas and is a LEED accredited professional since 2007. Kirk has been a valued member of Studio One Eleven for fourteen years. Affiliations • American Society of Landscape Architects • United States Green Building Council • Council of Landscape Architects Registration Board • License Number: CA-6121 (Landscape Architecture) Authorized to negotiate contracts on behalf of the firm. Michael Bohn, AIA Partner Authorized to negotiate contracts on behalf of the firm. Michael Bohn, AIA is a Senior Principal and Design Director with over 35 years of experience. His passion for urbanism lies in providing small interventions such as streetscapes, site activations, and the first parklets in Southern California which have supported small business during the pandemic. Michael has thoughtfully guided site designs such as a 90-acre site adjacent to wetlands in Southeast Long Beach, providing appropriately scaled mixed-use and architectural concepts appropriate for sensitive coastal areas to a six-block mixed use urban infill development in downtown Long Beach. His experience in the City of Long Beach includes the Downtown Vision Plan, which serves as the foundation for guiding development around the city’s light-rail transit during the next 15 years and has resulted in 8,000 new units, replacing mostly underutilized surface parking lots. His housing experience includes affordable, student, and market-rate projects. To date, he is responsible for the completion of almost 2,500 units with another 2,000 under construction or in the planning stages. He has led several urban outdoor eateries to help anchor traditional downtowns. Michael led the team for the Long Beach airport concessions located in the north and south concourse. It was his suggestion to activate the post security courtyard by connecting the restaurants fronting the space with glass and operable doors to provide outdoor dining and amenities such as a fire table. The design brought 10,000 square feet of new retail and restaurant space, thoughtfully curated with a contemporary aesthetic that celebrates local culture. Michael has been a cornerstone of Studio One Eleven for twenty years. Relevant Experience • St Francis Center, Long Beach, CA • Bellflower Service Shelter, Bellflower, CA • Children Today Day Care Center, Long Beach, CA • Los Altos YMCA, Long Beach, CA • New City School, Long Beach, CA • Santa Ana Arts Collective, Santa Ana, CA • Watts Works, Los Angeles, CA • Senior Arts Colony, Long Beach, CA • The Annex, Long Beach, CA • Ace 121, Glendale, CA • Willowbrook, Los Angeles County, CA • Zinnia Court, Signal Hill, CA • Collage, Long Beach, CA • Mosaic Gardens, Monterey Park, CA • St Francis Center, Long Beach, CA • Bellflower Service Shelter, Bellflower, CA • Children Today Day Care Center, Long Beach, CA • Los Altos YMCA, Long Beach, CA Education • Bachelor of Architecture, Cum Laude, • Cal Poly University, San Luis Obispo, CA • Ecole d’Art Americain, Fountainebleau, France • State Archaeological Camp with the Smithsonian and British Institutes, India Affiliations • Board member AIA LB/SB • Board member AIA CA • Co-Chair AIA CA Housing Steering Committee Board Member Institute of Innovation+Entrepreneurship • License Number: C21695 (Architecture) Awards • Watts Works: Architect’s Newspaper Best of Design Award, Social Impact Category • Santa Ana Arts Colective: 2023 AIA CA Residential Honor Award • Santa Ana Arts Collective: 2020 • Partake Collective: 2023 US Green Building Council Award • Watts Works: 2023 AIA LA Design Award • Laserfiche: 2023 AIA OC Honor Award • 200 West Ocean: 2023 AIA OC Citation Award • Watts Works: 2023 AIA OC Merit Award • Partake Collective: 2023 Long Beach Heritage Preservarion Award • Watts Works: 2022 Westside urban Forum Merit Award • Steelcraft Garden Grive: 2022 AIA OC Citation Award • Steelcraft Bellflower: 2021 Westside urban Forum Restaurant Design Merit Award • The Roost: 2019 AIA Long Beach/South Bay Merit Award Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 42 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 43 Education • Bachelor of Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Affiliations • Adjunct Professor Tenures at Otis College, Art Center, Cal Poly Pomona and USC • Lecturer at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA • License Number: C27713 (Architecture) Awards • Laserfiche: 2023 AIA OC Honor Award, USGBC-LA Sustainable Innovation Award for Health & Wellbeing Excellence • The Orange County Great Park: 2022 AIA OC Framework for Design Excellence Citation Award, 2021 Golden Nugget Award, Bet Community Amenity - Rise Park, 2019 AIA OC Merit Award - Cadence Park, AIA OC Citation Award - Great Parks Neighborhood, 2018 Lumen West Award of Merit - Novel Park, 2017 AIA Long Beach / South Bay Award - Novel Park • SteelCraft: 2022 AIA OC Citation Award, 2021 ASLA Merit Award, Westside Urban Forum Retail / Restaurant Design Merit Award, 2020 APA California Urban Design Merit Award, APA OC Award of Excellence • The Lot: 2015 AIA Long Beach / South Bay Design Award Scott Parker, RA Design Director, Associate Principal Scott Parker is a licensed architect with over 25 years of experience in architectural design. As Project Design Director and Associate Principal at Studio One Eleven, his work encompasses various project types, including hospitality, civic and mixed-use developments. Since joining Studio One Eleven in 2013, Scott has led the design efforts on several significant projects. These include West Harbor, a multi-phase retail, dining, and entertainment project in the Port of Los Angeles including a 6,200-seat outdoor amphitheater operated by the Nederlander Organization. He also successfully competed for the Laserfiche HQ project, which received a recent AIA Orange County award. His portfolio extends to The Lot (Plaza and Courtyard Buildings), a substantial redevelopment of the United Artists production lot in West Hollywood, and numerous award winning projects at the Great Park, Irvine both in design and master planning. Scott’s approach emphasizes creating meaningful places while ensuring value for project stakeholders. He also brings his teaching experience into his role of Design Director, fostering a collaborative design studio atmosphere within his teams. In addition to his professional work, Scott has taught at several major Los Angeles-area universities, including Sci- ARC, Otis College of Art and Design, Art Center, Cal Poly Pomona, and USC, contributing to architectural education in the region. Scott has been a strong influence on design at Studio One Eleven for eleven years. Relevant Experience • West Harbor Waterfront Redevelopment, San Pedro, CA • 4th and Central, Los Angeles, CA • Hollywood Central, Los Angeles, CA • Laserfiche HQ, Long Beach, CA • Parasol Park Community Bldg and Greenhouse, Irvine Great Park, CA • Novel Park Community Center, Irvine Great Park CA • Cadence Park Arts Buildings, Irvine Great Park, CA • Overlook at Rise Park, Irvine Great Park, CA • Steelcraft, Garden Grove, CA • The Exchange, Bellflower, CA • Leisuretown, Anaheim, CA • CSULB Student Housing, Long Beach, CA • The Lot (Plaza and Courtyard Buildings), West Hollywood, CA • The Bloc, Los Angeles, CA • Parasoft Tenant Improvement, Monrovia, CA • Sunset Hotel, West Hollywood, CA • Hyatt Regency, Waikiki, HI • Abigal Adams Apartments, Anaheim, CA • Veterans Housing, Long Beach, CA Education • Bachelor of Architecture, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Affiliations • Past President and Board Member of AIA Long Beach/South Bay • Past Board Member, Long Beach Architecture Week • Alumni and career fair participation at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Ryan Caldera, AIA Senior Project Manager, Senior Associate Ryan Caldera, AIA brings over 20 years of architectural experience to Studio One Eleven. In his role as senior project manager, he oversees all aspects of the initial concept design process through project construction completion. Highly skilled at developing project contract documents, Ryan also excels at ensuring all projects meet environmental, building, and zoning requirements. He is able to gracefully balance technical skills with effective communication while working in a fast- paced environment. Ryan’s experience includes large scale mixed-use developments, institutional, adaptive reuse, and commercial-retail experiential environments. Currently, he is leading teams on both market-rate and affordablee multi-family housing developments ranging in scale from large multi-block masterplan developments to single building urban infill developments. He is passionate about creating places and spaces to transform the lives of others and creating housing for all. Ryan has been a dedicated member of Studio One Eleven for nine years. Relevant Experience • West Harbor Waterfront Redevelopment, San Pedro, CA • 4th and Central, Los Angeles, CA • Hollywood Central, Los Angeles, CA • Laserfiche HQ, Long Beach, CA • Parasol Park Community Bldg and Greenhouse, Irvine Great Park, CA • Novel Park Community Center, Irvine Great Park CA • Cadence Park Arts Buildings, Irvine Great Park, CA • Overlook at Rise Park, Irvine Great Park, CA • Steelcraft, Garden Grove, CA • The Exchange, Bellflower, CA • Leisuretown, Anaheim, CA • CSULB Student Housing, Long Beach, CA • The Lot (Plaza and Courtyard Buildings), West Hollywood, CA • The Bloc, Los Angeles, CA • Parasoft Tenant Improvement, Monrovia, CA • Sunset Hotel, West Hollywood, CA • Hyatt Regency, Waikiki, HI • Abigal Adams Apartments, Anaheim, CA • Veterans Housing, Long Beach, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 44 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 45 Relevant Experience • SCAG Other to Residential Toolkit, SCAG Region, CA • Redevelopment of Commercial Sites to Housing, South Bay Cities, CA • LA ROSAH Land Use Study for Joint Development, LA County ,CA • Downtown Ontario Vision and Plan, Ontario, CA • Huntington Park Station Area Plans, Huntington Park, CA • Downtown Torrance Visioning, Torrance, CA • City Place Living Community Sustainability Study, Long Beach, CA • Alamitos Bay EcoDistrict Framework, Long Beach, CA • South Bay Cities Climate Action Plans, South Bay Cities, CA • Glendale Arts & Entertainment District Visioning, Glendale, CA • Montclair Place Master Plan, Montclair. CA • SCAG Go Human Campaign, Round 3, Los Angeles and Orange Counties • Disadvantaged Communities Planning Initiative, Southern California • Little Tokyo/Arts District Joint Development Opportunity Analysis • De Paul Campus Affordable Housing Masterplan, Montebello, CA Shruti Shankar, AICP, Int. Assoc. AIA Urban Design Director, Senior Associate Shruti Shankar is the Urban Design Director at Studio One Eleven, and a certified planner with an interdisciplinary background in Urban Design, Architecture and Sustainability. She brings over a decade of project experience in the USA and internationally to her work. She has led and worked on a variety of project types and scales, from placemaking, tactical urbanism and streetscape improvement projects, to urban design, community visioning and strategic planning. Shruti works with the project team to define the high-level goals and objectives for each project and participates in the full spectrum of project activities from research, community engagement visioning and planning, to design and implementation. She also works with junior staff to coordinate design efforts and oversee the production of deliverables and is well versed in research and the production of compelling documents. Recently, Shruti led planning and creative outreach efforts on the community-driven planning process for the Huntington Park Station Area Plans, as well as the Downtown Torrance Visioning. She was also involved in the visioning, design and community engagement efforts for Glendale’s Arts and Entertainment District, and streetscape improvements on Sherman Way and Main Street in Huntington Beach, CA. In addition, Shruti has led community visioning and engagement efforts through several prior tactical urbanism and placemaking initiatives, including leading efforts on the SCAG Go Human Round 3 campaign and the Disadvantaged Communities Planning Initiative, to design and host creative engagement initiatives for community input in six cities across Southern California. Shruti has been leading impactful urban design solutions at Studio One Eleven for the past nine years. Education • Global Certificate in Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles - Extension • Master of Urban Design, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri • Bachelor of Architecture, Anna University, Chennai, India Affiliations • American Planning Association USGBC Awards • Making LA together winner, deLAB2017 Awards • 2023 APA LA (Honor) and APA CA (Merit) Award under ‘Best Practices’ for the Other-to-Residential Toolkit”* 2022 APA LA Honor Award under ‘Best Practices’ for Huntington Park Station Area Plans • Doggerel-ARUP Essay Writing Competition, Runner Up; 2017 • American Planning Association: 2013 Awarded, Missouri Chapter, Outstanding Student Project Award • Fulbright-Nehru Fellowship in Leadership Development, 2011-12 • Metro Anna Salai: 2008, Urban Transport Hub Jitka Dekojova is Project Manager at Studio One Eleven, and a licensed landscape architect with an interdisciplinary background in Urban Design and Environmental Planning. She brings over a decade of project experience in the USA and internationally to her work. She has lead and worked on a variety of project types and scales, from streetscape improvement projects, to urban design, civic plazas, community engagement efforts to public parks. Jitka is well equipped to balance both aesthetics, current urban needs, and ecology in landscape design, while emphasizing adaptive reuse and green stormwater infrastructure. She takes into account the ephemeral phenomenological aspects of the urban environment: the need for whimsical elements, the joy of unexpected discovery in everyday urbanism, the advantage of flexibility in planned spaces, and the importance of mix of people to bring vibrancy into urban spaces. Jitka earned her Masters’ in Landscape Architecture from University of New Mexico following a double Masters’ degree in Landscape Engineering and Environmental Planning from Czech Republic. She is a licensed landscape architect and SITES Accredited Professional. Jitka joined Studio One Eleven in 2024 *Completed prior to working at Studio One Eleven Jitka Dekojova, ASLA, SITES AP Project Manager Education • Master of Landscape Architecture, University of New Mexico, `Albuquerque, NM • Master of Landscape Engineering and Environmental Planning, Czech University of LIfe Sciences, Prague Awards • ASLA New Mexico Honor Award NPDES Manual Update, 2021 • ASLA New Mexico Merit Award Albuquerque Civic Plaza Renovations, 2021 • ENR Southwest Top Young Professional, 2020 • ASLA New Mexico Award of Academic Excellence, 2012 Studio One Eleven - Open Interior Office Relevant Experience • Main Street Revitalization, Huntington Beach, CA • 6th Street Beautification, Corona, CA • Kenneth Hahn Japanese Garden, Los Angeles, CA • Albuquerque Rapid Transit, Albuquerque, NM* • Civic Plaza Revitalization, Albuquerque, NM* • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Manual, Santa Fe, NM* • ABQ Film Studios, Albuquerque, NM* • Lobo Rainforest at Innovate ABQ, Albuquerque, NM* • Gene Howe Park and Master Plan, Amarillo, TX Affiliations • American Soociety of Landscape Architects Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 46 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 47 Jennifer Nguyen Design Manager Jennifer serves as a Design Manager at Studio One Eleven and is a highly intuitive artist at heart. Her design process stems deeply from a place of art working to stimulate one’s thoughts and emotions by creating meaningful dialogue woven through architecture, place and user. She seeks to create authentic connections with people she works with and serve. Jennifer also focuses on watercoloring with a style that is fluid and flexible as she believes the same principles are key to good design and work that instills inclusivity in our community. Jennifer has been a valued member of Studio One Eleven for over three years. Relevant Experience • TCE Main, Los Angeles, CA • Hahn Square, Los Angeles, CA • Ronald McDonald House, West Los Angeles, CA • Balboa Fun Zone, Newport Beach, CA • Commonwealth Avenue, Anaheim, CA Education • University of Tennessee, Bachelor of Architecture Studio One Eleven - Open Interior Office Education • Bachelors of Science Landscape Architecture, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Affiliations • American Society of Landscape Architects • License Number: CA-6102 (Landscape Architecture) Awards • ASLA Nevada Project of the Year - The Urban Green, 2023 • ASLA Merit Award, The Oaks School Greenspace, 2023 • ASLA Honor Award Paramount Blvd.Urban Revitalization, 2021 • RDC-S111, Inc. Office: 2018 Architecture MasterPrize Honorable Mention, 2017 AIA Long Beach/South Bay Award; 2017 USGBC 1st Place in Health + Wellness; 2017 Architects Newspaper Design Award, Honorable Mention; 2017 SCDF Architecture Award; 2017 LEED Platinum; 2017 WELL Certified Moiri Fleming, ASLA Project Landscape Architect, Associate Moiri Fleming is a Senior Project Landscape Architect at Studio One Eleven and has a wide range of experience in conceptual planning through construction implementation for a variety of landscape architectural projects including parks, streetscapes and urban plazas. She has been responsible for leading design efforts on various landscape studio projects including most recently the Reno Entertainment District 2-acre Urban Green, Liberty Dogs Campus for Military Veterans in Reno, NV, Harvey Milk Park and The Streets of Long Beach, Paramount Boulevard Urban Revitalization, citywide bus shelter renovations and al fresco dining, Oak View Streetscape Beautification and Downtown / Main Street Studies in Huntington Beach Main Street Redesign, Oak View Neighborhood Beautification, Sherman Way Streetscape, and the design of a range of public spaces in Los Angeles. Her experience entails designing spaces that promote pedestrian activity within the public realm, community gathering spaces and connectivity to open space, master-planning, green infrastructure /storm water capture and re-use, and incorporating California adapted and native plants into the design. Moiri is a licensed landscape architect in California. Moiri has been providing landscape architectural leadership at Studio One Eleven for a decade. Relevant Experience • Oak View Streetscape Beautification, Huntington Beach, CA • Main Street Redesign, Huntington Beach, CA • The Streets, Long Beach, CA • 4th and Central Masterplan and Redevelopment, Los Angeles, CA • Hollywood Central, Los Angeles, CA • Sherman Way Streetscape Improvements, Los Angeles, CA • Long Beach Parklets, Long Beach, CA • Paramount Boulevard Streetscape, Paramount, CA • Artsakh Avenue Urban Design and Placemaking, Glendale, CA • City Place Remodel and Streetscape, Long Beach, CA • Santee Court Urban Plaza, Los Angeles, CA • Shoreline Village Masterplan, Long Beach, CA • Downtown Ventura Masterplan, Ventura, CA • Reno Aces Ballpark Family Play Zone, Reno, NV • Oakview Neighborhood Beautification, Huntington Beach, CA • Al Fresco Dining Program, Paramount, CA • Balboa Fun Zone, Newport Beach, CA • The Urban Green, Reno, NV • The Oaks School Greenspace, Los Angeles, CA • Carpinteria Towne Trail and Parks Masterplan, Carpinteria, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 48 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 49 Project Management Approach Studio One Eleven’s Proactive Project Management Approach At Studio One Eleven, we take pride in our longstanding relationships with cities and public agencies, built on a foundation of trust, collaboration, and successful project outcomes. Our proactive project management approach ensures we think ahead, plan for success, and maintain clear and consistent communication throughout the project lifecycle. To effectively manage projects and ensure clear communication, we utilize a variety of methods and technologies tailored to the specific scope of work. Our leadership team—comprising a Principal-in- Charge, Senior Project Landscape Architect, and a dedicated Project Manager—serves as the primary liaison between the project team and City staff. This structure fosters strong working relationships, enabling seamless collaboration and alignment of goals. The Project Manager acts as the central point of contact for all communication and coordination, with consistent support and guidance from senior leadership and active Principal involvement. We prioritize frequent communication with City representatives via email, phone, and meetings to review progress, solicit feedback, coordinate milestones, and address any questions. At the start of each project, we advocate for an on-site meeting to introduce team members, discuss project requirements, establish the schedule, and review the scope, budget, and funding sources. This meeting also serves to outline best practices, set goals, and establish metrics for measuring project success. Following the meeting, we provide a detailed record of discussions, any requests for additional information, and initiate site analysis. During the project, major milestones are marked with in-person meetings, while weekly or bi-weekly virtual meetings (via Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or other platforms) ensure consistent progress reviews and collaboration. Each meeting is followed by written minutes, updated schedules, and a PDF record of milestone presentations for City review and feedback. For interactive collaboration, we utilize tools like Miro, an online whiteboard that simulates a pin-up wall and enables real-time participation from project team members and City staff. Project schedules are developed using Smartsheet, offering flexible formats such as Grid, Gantt, Card, or Calendar views, depending on project needs. We also use Microsoft Excel to ensure clarity and accessibility of project data. These schedules are regularly updated at each milestone to maintain alignment with project objectives. We evaluate project conditions, assess potential challenges, and implement strategies to address them, ensuring project timelines, budgets, and quality standards are maintained in alignment with design goals. Additionally, our team tracks budgets at critical milestones, providing regular updates and implementing cost-control measures to ensure financial accountability and alignment with the project’s objectives. To uphold excellence, we implement rigorous quality assurance and quality control processes at every stage, reviewing deliverables to maintain the highest professional standards in design, documentation, and construction. We also monitor relevant code updates and incorporate them as applicable, ensuring compliance with current regulations. Our team remains flexible and responsive to address unforeseen challenges or evolving project requirements, ensuring the project stays on track and aligned with its goals. Our process is grounded in collaboration, treating clients as partners and working alongside them to achieve shared goals and meaningful results. With a proactive management approach, we facilitate project milestones, coordinate with consultants, guide reviews by City agencies and stakeholders, and work closely with contractors to ensure the project vision is successfully realized. Additionally, we provide post-construction support, including project handover, maintenance guidance, and follow-up consultations or evaluations to ensure the project’s long-term success. This comprehensive approach to project management ensures that every aspect of a project is thoughtfully guided, delivering outcomes that align with its intended goals and consistently exceed client expectations. Section 4.7: Project Management Approach Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 50 | Studio One Eleven If you have questions or require additional information, please contact: Kirk Keller, ASLA, LEED AP 562.247.6206 kirk.keller@studio-111.com Studio One Eleven 245 East Third Street Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 | f 562.628.8005 The Diversity of Our Work Represents the Complexity of Cities. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Scope of Work for: Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various on-Call Services Section 5.7 Architectural Engineering January 13, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 245 East Third Street, Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 f 562.901.1501 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 2 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 3 Our designs are inspired by careful assessment of program, culture and place Section 5.7: Architecture Professional Services Based on our experience with previous architecture, streetscape, and open space projects we understand the need to create timely and actionable plans to serve the City’s needs. Our collaborative team will propose an efficient scope of services to generate high-quality ideas and deliverables as well as a robust schedule that allows us to plan for several activities in parallel to meet the City’s desired timeline for a particular project. Our agile team will test ideas quickly at the project outset to inform refinement of the design. We will also work with City staff to establish the key metrics of success for any given project and emphasize that timely feedback and input from all stakeholders is critical at each project milestone to keep a project on schedule, generate momentum and build internal and external consensus. Throughout the life of a project we will encourage recurring check-in meetings with the City and provide status reports. With an emphasis on creating cohesive, sustainable and vibrant pedestrian-scaled spaces, our designs begin by evaluating the context, connectivity, and history of a space to identify project constraints and opportunities for site specific place-making. We work quickly to establish project goals, architecture character, and determine programming of spaces and operational considerations in collaboration with community partners and city agencies. Studio One Eleven (S111) can prepare project concept narratives, project goals, diagrams, illustrative plans/sections/axonomeric views, 3D visualizations, supportive precedent imagery, technical construction drawings and specifications, and facilitate construction administration We also consider the following as integral components of design: crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), sustainable material selections, natural shading, ventilation, daylighting, sun and considerations for long term maintenance and longevity of design elements and their materiality. As part of the process we also evaluate any current and future local or national trends as a source for recreation, wellness, and community building. We also look at established versus emerging technologies (e.g. smart infrastructure) and make recommendations regarding space programming and activation, placekeeping, branding, wayfinding/signage and connectivity. Feasibility Studies & Needs Assessment S111 will review the City’s plans and relevant public policies to establish the applicable codes and processes relevant to the specific project site and the goals and priorities that will inform the project. We will utilize this information to aid in evaluating opportunities and constraints. The Project Team will then visit specific sites to evaluate and document considering items such as: Watts Works, Los Angeles, CA Scope of Work Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 4 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 5 use/capacity, arrangements, condition, vehicular and pedestrian accessibility, tree canopy, site furnishing/amenities, lighting, parking, above ground infrastructure, proximity project site to public transportation. We are adept at developing analysis to gain an understanding of condition, functionality, convenience and to inform improvements or measures that should be encouraged to support the project based on the existing conditions. We will engage a CASp consultant to evaluate the accessibility of a particular park or community building, as occurs. Example deliverables during this phase may include research memorandum with matrix of applicable codes and any planned projects or adjacencies; Existing Conditions Assessment & Feasibility Report; Site diagrams and existing context photos with notes; Existing and Proposed sections and/or plan diagrams; Opportunities diagram with design strategies and opinion of ROM costs and analysis. Outreach and Community Engagement Prior to establishing a tailored Outreach and Community Engagement, if/as required by the Project brief, our Team will meet with the City to review prior outreach efforts and review what information has been gathered that will inform a specific project. Based on the known information the Team will develop an engagement plan for City review and comment. During this process S111 will work with the City to identify key community members and neighborhood / focus groups that will be empowered to take an active role in the outreach and engagement process as partners with our team. Following approval of the project outreach strategy S111 will establish a project branding to give the project an identity that will become familiar and recognizable throughout the various tasks and deliverables. Outreach and engagement is expected to create a transparent process so that the final project or plan is better understood and supported by the community. S111 brings strong graphic visualization skills to enable the layperson to engage with complex planning and development ideas through approachable, creative, and fun imagery, including sketches, drawings, and precedents. Conceptual Development The analysis of current project usage, needs, desires, and interest of the community can be represented as a separate or integrated deliverable. Utilizing the information gathered in needs assessment phase we begin with a review of the community and stakeholder input to assess current and future project needs, as required. Depending on the scale of a project our team may recommend convening for a working session with the City to facilitate a goal setting discussion and to review project objectives, site constraints, desired development program, overall parameters, and regulatory provisions in a “charrette-style” format. This working session will help guide the project visioning and design process to focus on specific opportunities and challenges for the project. S111 has successfully facilitated design charrette(s) with multiple sub-consultants, City Staff, and other stakeholders, to inform the conceptual layout and diagram. Our creative team is adept at conveying concepts in numerous ways. A ‘kit of parts’ approach allows city staff and community members to understand various components that contribute to design by providing a menu that can be expanded or reduced based on feedback. Alternatively S111 can evolve initial conceptual site layout sketches and diagrams into conceptual alternatives utilizing an array of diagrams, precedent imagery, material palettes, 2D and 3D vignettes, and plan layouts to convey ideas. We are very nimble with developing multiple options for consideration and further exploration. The goal of the concept phase of work is to present big ideas and alternates for consideration, in order to define a preferred direction. Our team is well versed in developing design concepts and related activities needed to establish the parameters for design development and documentation. Meetings, Presentations and Communication S111 takes pride in our longstanding relationships with cities and public agencies. In our work, we utilize a variety of methods and technologies to communicate the progress and process of a given project. Our Project Managers, and/or Project Architect act as the single point of contact to the City with a designated project manager responsible for all correspondence and consultant coordination. As a result we have found that Studio representatives and City staff become familiar and forge a strong team relationship. Throughout the process, we are in regular communication with the City via email, phone and teleconference to review progress, solicit feedback, build consensus, coordinate project milestones and ask or answer any questions that may arise. Our Studio has vast experience with attending, facilitating and developing all presentation materials and agendas for meetings with City Staff, Neighborhood Associations, Permitting Agencies, Boards, Commissions, and City Councils. Scheduling ongoing check-in meetings is an important part of effective project communication and we will coordinate with the City to establish a cadence for bi-weekly or monthly check-in calls via Microsoft Teams, Zoom or similar teleconference platform. These regular check-ins will provide an opportunity to chart completed tasks, review status of ongoing work, reaffirm key milestones, goals, and deliverables, and flag any anticipated issues that may impact the schedule or budget and prepare for upcoming presentations. Contract Documents and Permitting We are especially enthusiastic about the opportunity to realize our conceptual designs. Under the leadership of licensed architects, our team brings considerable experience in the execution of a variety of public projects and proven ability to prepare complete Plans (Schematic Design, Design Development and Construction Documentation) and specifications for project permitting and subsequent bid advertisement. Design of project improvements will be prepared in accordance with established design criteria and conform to requirements of the City and other governmental agencies including, but not limited to the California Building Code and ADA/ Title 24 in order to achieve project objectives. The PS&E will be submitted to the City at established contract documents milestones with accompanying cost estimate and specifications. Documents will include bid items and definitions, and incorporate technical architectural specifications. All plans, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations and reports will be signed and stamped by the licensed professional architect or engineer. We advocate for Bi-Weekly project coordination meetings during plan preparation phases and provide milestone submittals (e.g. 50%, 90%, 100%) for City review and consultant coordination and Quality Assurance Reviews. Bid Advertisement and Construction Support After completion of permitting S111 can assist in preparation and assembly of bid package and support City throughout the project advertisement period. We are excited to provide construction support services as a part of seeing a project’s design intent carried out from start to finish. Our experienced team members are dedicated to each project for its entirety and will attend the construction kick-off meeting and oversee review of RFI’s, shop drawings, samples, mock-ups and product submittals for compliance with Plans and specification as applicable. We advocate for periodic site observations to review progress of construction and provide report(s) at critical stages and will generate “punch list” items in preparation for a final site observation job walk with Contractor and City representative for acceptance of work in substantial compliance with contract documents. As Built Plans Preparation or coordination of final information for project close-out is also a service we offer. Glendale and Arts & Entertainment District Visioning, Glendale, CA Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 6 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 7 After receipt of the Contractor’s construction drawing “redline” notations and records, we will prepare as-built drawings where each drawing sheet is prominently noted “RECORD DRAWING” and all as-built changes are clouded with a numbered delta symbol keyed to a numbered delta symbol in the title block revisions column. The BIM layering system used will make it possible to print out a correct, unclouded as-constructed drawing. Quality Assurance Procedures S111 has comprehensive design and technical expertise, with quality assurance/quality control procedures built into our design and documentation process. Quality isn’t “inspected” into each of our projects; it is planned for and designed into them. Our most effective method for making quality assurance happen is to plan for it and our quality management doesn’t rely solely on checklists; it relies on the people and the process. Quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) starts at the beginning of each project by choosing work aligned with the firm’s capabilities and expertise and then each project is assigned to the appropriate staff and leadership. As part of our corporate culture, a quality management plan (QMP) identifies, corrects and intends to minimize conflicts and inconsistencies in the documents. The QMP is developed for each project and included as an integral part of the project work plan. The project’s size and complexity will generally determine the magnitude of, and detail required for, the plan. The QMP defines which documents are to be reviewed, who will review them, when documents are to be reviewed and coordination with consultants. Conceptual review – One or more persons check the basic concepts on which the project is based. In the early stages of the project, basic concepts are developed which are then implemented throughout the remainder of the document process. If those concepts are not sound, the details of the construction documents will not work. Someone outside of the project team will review those basic concepts to make sure they make sense and can be achieved within the project budget and schedule constraints. The reviewer(s) also ensure that the constructed project will meet the City’s needs as specified in the contract. Discipline review(s) – One or more independent persons review the technical aspects of the project to determine that the agreed-upon criteria and procedures are being followed, City/contract requirements being met, and firm QA processes are being followed. Discipline review(s) may be either intra-disciplinary, where an experienced person from each discipline (architecture, urban design or landscape architecture) checks the applicable calculations, drawings and specifications prepared by that discipline; inter-disciplinary, where one or more individuals from the project team perform a detailed review to ensure consistency and identify conflicts between disciplines; or both. Project manual review – This review is conducted by the team member responsible for preparing the initial spec check-list. Any new or edited prototypical spec sections are reviewed page by page for accuracy. Any corrections are brought to the specifications writer who will incorporate the changes into the master. A Drawings to Project Manual cross-check will also determine what, if any, “specification” information that will need to appear on the drawings and check for inconsistencies between the drawings and specifications. Constructibility review and Bid Set – A constructibility review is conducted to identify potential technical or construction difficulties before bidding the project to contractors. Final bid set review – One or more independent persons conduct a review of the final set of plans and specifications just prior to issuance for bid to contractors. The aim here is to uncover any potential inconsistencies to minimize questions, addenda and/or change orders after the contract award. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact: Michael Bohn, AIA 562.901.1500 mbohn@studio-111.com Studio One Eleven 245 East Third Street Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 | f 562.628.8005 The Diversity of Our Work Represents the Complexity of Cities. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Scope of Work for: Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various on-Call Services Section 5.8 Landscape Architecture January 13, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 245 East Third Street, Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 f 562.901.1501 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 2 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 3 Our designs are inspired by careful assessment of program, culture and place Section 5.8: Landscape Architecture Professional Services With extensive experience in streetscape, parks, plazas, and open space projects, we understand the importance of creating timely, actionable plans that effectively meet the City’s needs. Our collaborative team is dedicated to proposing an efficient scope of services and workflow that generates high-quality ideas and deliverables, supported by a robust schedule designed to run several activities in parallel to meet the City’s desired timeline and project goals. At the project outset, our agile team will rapidly test and refine concepts to inform the design process. We will work closely with City staff to establish key metrics of success and emphasize the importance of timely feedback and input from all stakeholders at each milestone. Our approach is to ensure that every aspect of the project builds momentum and informs a successful outcome while guiding the project to stay on schedule, budget and foster both internal and external consensus. With an emphasis on creating cohesive, sustainable and vibrant pedestrian-scaled outdoor spaces, our designs begin by evaluating the context, connectivity, and history of a space to identify project constraints and opportunities for site specific place-making. We work quickly to establish project goals, landscape character, and determine programming of outdoor spaces and operational considerations in collaboration with community partners and city agencies. Studio One Eleven is recognized for our thought leadership, paired with strong design and documentation capabilities. As a full-service firm, we take a holistic approach, guiding projects from initial ideas through implementation. Our expertise encompasses preparing project concept narratives, landscape design intent, project goals, diagrams, illustrative plans, sections, axonometric views, 3D visualizations, supportive precedent imagery, and proposed palettes for planting, hardscape, and site furnishings. We develop Draft and Final Design Concept packages for presentations to City Staff, Planning Commissions, or City Councils. Following this, we seamlessly transition into schematic / design development, construction documentation, permitting, bidding, and construction administration and observation services, ensuring a comprehensive and cohesive process from start to finish. We also consider the following as integral components of design: crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), innovative stormwater collection, nature based solutions and low impact development (LID), sustainable material selections, site appropriate water wise landscaping, natural shading, high efficiency irrigation techniques, and considerations for long term maintenance and longevity of design elements and their materiality. As part of the process we also evaluate any current and future local or national trends regarding public space as a source for recreation, wellness, and community building. We also look at established versus emerging technologies (e.g. smart infrastructure) and make recommendations regarding space programming and activation, placekeeping, branding, wayfinding/ signage and connectivity. Feasibility Studies & Needs Assessment S111 will review the City’s plans and relevant public policies to establish the applicable codes and processes relevant to the specific project site and the goals and priorities that will inform the project. We will utilize this information to aid in evaluating opportunities and constraints and conducting site and field investigations. The Project Team will visit specific sites to evaluate and document considering items such as: use/capacity, arrangements, condition, vehicular and pedestrian accessibility, tree canopy, site furnishing/amenities, lighting, parking, above ground infrastructure, and proximity of project site to public transportation. We are adept at developing a Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis to gain an understanding of condition, functionality, convenience and to inform improvements or measures that should be encouraged to support the project based on the existing conditions. We will engage a CASp consultant to evaluate the accessibility of a particular park or community building, as occurs. Example deliverables during this phase may include research memorandum with matrix of applicable codes and any planned projects or adjacencies; Existing Conditions Assessment & Feasibility Report; Site diagrams and existing context photos with notes; Existing and Proposed sections and/ or plan diagrams; SWOT analysis of existing inventory; Opportunities diagram with design strategies and opinion of ROM costs and analysis. Outreach and Community Engagement Prior to establishing a tailored Outreach and Community Engagement, if/as required by the Project brief, our Team will meet with the City to review prior outreach efforts and review what information has been gathered that will inform a specific project. Based on the known Scope of Work Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 4 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 5 information the Team will develop an engagement plan for City review and comment. During this process S111 will work with the City to identify key community members and neighborhood / focus groups that will be empowered to take an active role in the outreach and engagement process as partners with our team. Following approval of the project outreach strategy S111 will establish a project branding to give the project an identity that will become familiar and recognizable throughout the various tasks and deliverables. Outreach and engagement is expected to create a transparent process so that the final project or plan is better understood and supported by the community. S111 brings strong graphic visualization skills to enable the layperson to engage with complex planning and development ideas through approachable, creative, and fun imagery, including sketches, drawings, and precedents. Conceptual Development The analysis of current project usage, needs, desires, and interest of the community can be represented as a separate or integrated deliverable. Utilizing the information gathered in needs assessment phase we begin with a review of the community and stakeholder input to assess current and future project needs, as required. Depending on the scale of a project our team may recommend convening for a working session with the City to facilitate a goal setting discussion and to review project objectives, site constraints, desired development program, overall parameters, and regulatory provisions in a “charrette-style” format. This working session will help guide the project visioning and design process to focus on specific opportunities and challenges for the project. S111 has successfully facilitated design charrette(s) with multiple sub-consultants, City Staff, and other stakeholders, to inform the conceptual site layout and diagram. Our creative team is adept at conveying concepts in numerous ways. A ‘kit of parts’ approach allows city staff and community members to understand various components that contribute to design by providing a menu that can be expanded or reduced based on feedback. Alternatively S111 can initiate and evolve initial conceptual site layout sketches and diagrams into conceptual alternatives utilizing an array of diagrams, precedent imagery, landscape palettes, material boards, 2D and 3D vignette renderings, and plan layouts to convey ideas. We are very nimble with developing multiple options for consideration and further exploration. The goal of the concept phase of work is to present big ideas and alternates/options for consideration, in order to define a preferred direction. Our team is well-versed in developing design concepts and activities essential to design development and documentation. During the conceptual phase, we provide landscape planning and design services for both new and existing facilities, integrating preliminary siting, grading, and landscape layouts to shape effective design options. Meetings, Presentations and Communication S111 takes pride in our longstanding relationships with cities and public agencies. In our work, we utilize a variety of methods and technologies to communicate the progress and process of a given project. Our Project Directors, and/or Project Landscape Architect act as the single point of contact to the City with a designated Project Manager responsible for all correspondence and consultant coordination. As a result we have found that Studio representatives and City staff become familiar and forge a strong team relationship. Throughout the process, we are in regular communication with the City via email, phone and teleconference meetings to review progress, solicit feedback, build consensus, coordinate project milestones and ask or answer any questions that may arise. Our Studio has vast experience with attending, facilitating and developing all presentation materials and agendas for meetings with City Staff, Neighborhood Associations, Permitting Agencies, Boards, Commissions, and City Councils. Scheduling ongoing check-in meetings is an important part of effective project communication and we will coordinate with the City to establish a cadence for bi-weekly or monthly check-in calls via Microsoft Teams, Zoom or similar teleconference platform. These regular check-ins will provide an opportunity to chart completed tasks, review status of ongoing work, reaffirm key milestones, goals, and deliverables, and flag any anticipated issues that may impact the schedule or budget and prepare for upcoming presentations. Contract Documents and Permitting We are especially enthusiastic about the opportunity to realize our conceptual designs. Under the leadership of licensed landscape architects, our team brings considerable experience in the execution of a variety of public projects and proven ability to prepare complete Plans (Schematic Design, Design Development and Construction Documentation) and technical specifications for project permitting and subsequent bid advertisement. These services can include—but are not limited to—demolition, landscape site plans, irrigation, planting, landscape lighting, and all associated details, calculations and schedules. In addition, we can integrate cost estimation via consultant(s) at each project milestone to accurately inform and manage project costs. Design of project improvements will be prepared in accordance with established design criteria and conform to requirements of the City and other governmental agencies including, but not limited to the California Building Code, ADA/Title 24, and State Water Ordinance Requirements in order to achieve project objectives. The PS&E will be submitted to the City at established contract documents milestones with accompanying cost estimate and specifications. Documents will include bid items and definitions, and incorporate technical landscape architectural specifications. All plans, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations and reports will be signed and stamped by the licensed professional landscape architect, architect or engineer. We advocate for Bi- Weekly project coordination meetings during plan preparation phases and provide milestone submittals (e.g. 50%, 90%, 100%) for City review and consultant coordination and Quality Assurance Reviews. Bid Advertisement and Construction Support After completion of permitting, S111 can compile the bid set, including plans, specifications, and City bid forms for all disciplines, to be distributed by the City to project bidders. During the bid process, the project team will provide prospective contractors with clarification of the construction documents and design intent via Requests for Information (RFIs). If any changes are required S111 will issue Construction Change Directives (CCDs), Addenda, and/or Bulletins with clouded revisions and a corresponding narratives, incorporating any City- requested modifications during the bidding process. We are excited to provide construction support services as a part of seeing a project’s design intent carried out from start to finish. Our experienced team members are dedicated to each project for its entirety. As part of the construction administration process, our team will attend a pre-construction meeting organized by the City. We will review and approve samples, mock- ups, submittals, and shop drawings for compliance with the contract documents within the specified time frames, and respond to contractor Requests for Information (RFIs) as needed. Our project manager or Senior Landscape Architect will attend construction administration meetings organized by the contractor at select times throughout the construction period. In addition, the project team will conduct site observations at critical milestones, providing field observation reports to the City to confirm general compliance with the drawings and design intent. We will also perform a project “punch list” job walk with City representatives and the contractor to verify substantial completion and compliance with the contract documents, followed by a final job walk to ensure all punch list items have been fully addressed before acceptance of the work. Downey Avenue Median Pilot Project, Paramount Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 6 | Studio One Eleven Studio One Eleven | 7 As Built Plans Preparation or coordination of final information for project close-out is also a service we offer. After receipt of the Contractor’s construction drawing field change “redline” notations and records, we will prepare as-built drawings where each drawing sheet is prominently noted “RECORD DRAWING” and all as-built changes are clouded with a numbered delta symbol keyed to a numbered delta symbol in the title block revisions column. The AutoCAD layering system used will make it possible to print out a correct, unclouded as-constructed drawing. Studio One Eleven will provide the city with a single compilation of “record drawing set” in digital format. Quality Assurance Procedures S111 has comprehensive design and technical expertise, with quality assurance/quality control procedures built into our design and documentation process. Quality isn’t “inspected” into each of our projects; it is planned for and designed into them. Our most effective method for making quality assurance happen is to plan for it and our quality management doesn’t rely solely on checklists; it relies on the people and the process. Quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) starts at the beginning of each project by choosing work aligned with the firm’s capabilities and expertise and then each project is assigned to the appropriate staff and leadership. As part of our corporate culture, a quality management plan (QMP) identifies, corrects and intends to minimize conflicts and inconsistencies in the documents. The QMP is developed for each project and included as an integral part of the project work plan. The project’s size and complexity will generally determine the magnitude of, and detail required for, the plan. The QMP defines which documents are to be reviewed, who will review them, when documents are to be reviewed and coordination with consultants. Conceptual review – One or more persons check the basic concepts on which the project is based. In the early stages of the project, basic concepts are developed which are then implemented throughout the remainder of the document process. If those concepts are not sound, the details of the construction documents will not work. Someone outside of the project team will review those basic concepts to make sure they make sense and can be achieved within the project budget and schedule constraints. The reviewer(s) also ensure that the constructed project will meet the client’s needs as specified in the contract. Discipline review(s) – One or more independent persons review the technical aspects of the project to determine that the agreed-upon criteria and procedures are being followed, client/contract requirements being met, and firm QA processes are being followed. Discipline review(s) may be either intra-disciplinary, where an experienced person from each discipline (architecture, urban design or landscape architecture) checks the applicable calculations, drawings and specifications prepared by that discipline; inter- disciplinary, where one or more individuals from the project team perform a detailed review to ensure consistency and identify conflicts between disciplines; or both. Project manual review – This review is conducted by the team member responsible for preparing the initial spec check-list. Any new or edited prototypical spec sections are reviewed page by page for accuracy. Any corrections are brought to the specifications writer who will incorporate the changes into the master. A Drawings to Project Manual cross-check will also determine what, if any, “specification” information that will need to appear on the drawings and check for inconsistencies between the drawings and specifications. Constructibility review and Bid Set – A constructibility review is conducted to identify potential technical or construction difficulties before bidding the project to contractors. Final bid set review – One or more independent persons conduct a review of the final set of plans and specifications just prior to issuance for bid to contractors. The aim here is to uncover any potential inconsistencies to minimize questions, addenda and/ or change orders after the contract award. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact: Kirk Keller, ASLA, LEED AP 562.247.6206 kirk.keller@studio-111.com Studio One Eleven 245 East Third Street Long Beach, California 90802 t 562.901.1500 | f 562.628.8005 The Diversity of Our Work Represents the Complexity of Cities. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 23 of 30 “EXHIBIT A” CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGACONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Consultants. I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding SOQ responses received in response to the Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 Various On-Call Services. I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any SOQ response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any SOQ response, or removal of same from designated areas. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein. (Print Name) (Relationship to the City) (Relationship to the Consultant) (Signature) Kirk Keller ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 1-13-2025 (Date) Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. potential Consultant self / Principal, Studio One Eleven Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Page 24 of 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ “EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” Mark the appropriate choice, below: _____ Vendors accepts the PSA without exception. OR _____ Vendors proposes exceptions to the PSA. Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as “Exception Summary”, which shall include the Vendors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive. ___________________________________ Signature Kirk Keller Printed Name Principal, Landscape Architecture Title 1-13-2025 Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ X Studio One Eleven Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Section Edit Rationale 7.1 7.1 Insert the underlined text: City’s reuse or modification (without the professional involvement of the Consultant) of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk. Modification of the documents may enter errors or omissions into our work product which we can neither control, nor anticipate. 11.1 11.1 Strike: Attorneys, agents, volunteers Recommendation from insurance for the insurability of the defense and indemnification requirements. 11.1 11.1 Strike: demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), whether actual, alleged or threatened Recommendation from insurance for the insurability of the defense and indemnification requirements. 11.1 11.1 Insert “reimbursed by the consultant” in the sentence Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is reimbursed by the Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. Our insurance provides reimbursement of defense costs in proportion with our fault. The insurance company has greater financial resources for the protection of the City than our firm itself. 11.5 11.2, insert negligence in the following: in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligent acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, Negligence is required to trigger insurability. 12.2.4 Section 12.2, 4, Professional Liability: strike “The policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable.” Contractual liability does not exist as an endorsement for PL on the insurance marketplace. 12.3.4 Section 12.3, 4, Auto Liability: amend to $1,000,000 combined single limit. This is what our coverage contains. 12.5.1 12.5, 1, strike “The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated Our insurance does not support this language. Exception Summary Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured.” 12.5.2 12.5, 2, insert “commercial general liability and automobile liability” after “For any.” Only CGL and Auto lines of insurance cover this. 12.5.3 12.5, 3, insert “commercial general liability and automobile liability” after “Consultant’s”. Only CGL and Auto lines of insurance cover this. 12.5.4 12.5, 4, strike “first class strike “(ten (10) days prior written notice for non- payment of premium)” Our insurance does not support this language. 12.5.7 12.5, 7, strike. Our insurance does not support this language. 12.5.8 12.5, 8, strike. Defense costs erode our PL policy. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Page 25 of 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ “EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” I, _Kirk Keller________ the Principal, Landscape Architecture______ (President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative) of __Studio One Eleven______________, certify that the (Name of Company, Corporation or Owner) Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services have been read and understood and that our Vendors is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract. ___________________________________ Signature Kirk Keller Printed Name Principal, Landscape Architecture Title 1-13-2025 Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Studio One Eleven and Authorized Representative Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 26 of 30 “EXHIBIT D” ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Consultants hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this SOQ have been received, if any. Consultants understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the SOQ response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Consultants’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. •__No. 001_______ •_________________ _ •_________________ ___________________________________ Signature Kirk Keller Printed Name Principal, Landscape Architecture Title 1-13-2025 Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Studio One Eleven Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Page 27 of 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ “EXHIBIT E DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM I certify that neither ___Studio One Eleven___ (Consultant) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. I acknowledge that if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified. ___________________________________ Signature Kirk Keller Printed Name Principal, Landscape Architecture Title 1-13-2025 Date Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Studio One Eleven Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 28 of 30 “EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of ________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation. Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the city is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Vendors. Successful Vendors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify. YES __________ NO _________ Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. X 90 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) #24/25-501 for Various On-Call Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 29 of 30 “EXHIBIT G” SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this SOQ response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following SOQ response. THE CONSULTANTS IN SUBMITTING THIS SOQ RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR SOQ RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE. Company Name: Address: (Street, Su. # City, State, Zip) Telephone #: Fax #: E-mail address:Web Address: Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Signature: Date: Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G. Studio One Eleven 562-901-1500 kirk.keller@studio-111.com Kirk Keller 245 E. 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 www.studio-111.com Principal, Landscape Architecture 1-13-2025 562.628.8005 Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1 Staff 12: $332.00 Staff 11: $309.00 Staff 10: $286.00 Staff 9: $275.00 Staff 8: $263.00 Staff 7: $252.00 Staff 6: $235.00 Staff 5: $223.00 Staff 4: $200.00 Staff 3: $178.00 Staff 2: $155.00 Staff 1: $109.00 Auto Mileage: $0.70 per mile Air Travel and Auto Rental: Actual cost plus 15% Subsistence (lodging, meals and incidentals): Actual cost plus 15% (where the work requires that employee stay over night away from home, or travels beyond 100 miles one-way from our office). a. Office and drafting supplies are included in the hourly rate in Paragraph 1. b. Cost of printing, color copies, CAD plotting and reproductions are charged at cost plus 15% from commercial reprographics companies. c. Outside services i.e., messenger, Federal Express, express mail, etc., ar e charged at actual cost plus 15%. d. Any reimbursable expenses requested by the client subsequent to the completion of our contract scope of work shall be billed on a time and material basis. This includes the cost of professional fees required to process this request. Actual cost plus 15%. In accordance with normal architectural rate review practices, we may periodically revise this Schedule of Fees in keeping with industry rate changes. We reserve the right to incorporate these changes into existing contracts and/or changes in services. Docusign Envelope ID: F00116C8-A4BF-48AB-9449-680F2C622D03Docusign Envelope ID: D140DC56-D461-4F68-9558-3557E2133CB1