Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/11/05 - Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 1 Mayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Ashley Stickler CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA November 5, 2025 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION REGULAR MEETINGS TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086. Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas. CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 2 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020833150, AND 020833151, AS WELL AS THE AREA DEPICTED AS “CHELSEA WAY” ON SAN BERNARINO COUNTY ASSESSOR MAP BOOK NUMBER 0208 PAGE 33 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHRIS HYUN, JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) E. RECESS CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 3 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 4 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D.CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of October 15, 2025. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,716,842.83 for City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $9,534,663.44 Dated October 2, 2025, Through October 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,856.51 Dated October 2, 2025, Through October 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D4. Consideration to Cancel the January 7, 2026, Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, and City Council. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration to Declare Computers, Monitors, Laptops, Printers, and iPads, That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY) D6. Consideration of the Recommendation from the Library Board of Trustees to Name the Relocated Archibald Library to the Diane Williams Library at Lions Park. (CITY) D7. Consideration of a Reimbursement Request Submitted by Core Rancho, LLC For Undergrounding Existing Overhead Utilities along the North Side of Foothill Boulevard, West of East Avenue, Related to Case No. SUBTT19945 and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $156,400 from the Underground Utilities Fund (129). (CITY) D8. Consideration to Approve Parcel Map No. 20894 Related to Case No. SUBTPM20894, Located on the Southeast Corner of Eighth Street and Cottage Avenue. This Item Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. (CITY) D9. Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Rehabilitation Project FY 24-25 as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D10. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project Constructed Under the Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) (CO 20-135). (CITY) D11. Consideration to Accept and Allocate Grant Revenue in the Amount of $3,078 Awarded by the California State Library for Zip Books Services. (CITY) D12. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No. DRC2023-00322, Located at 8797 Hermosa Avenue (Project). This Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt From the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-083) (CITY) 7 16 46 48 49 52 60 64 67 71 74 76 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 5 D13. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $79,500 for Independent Quality Control Design Services and San Bernardino County Permit Fees for the Heritage Park Pedestrian Bridges Replacement Project Phase 2; and Approval of Resolution No. 2025-085 Approving the Interfund Loan Agreement from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund (198) to the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) in a not-to-exceed Amount of $442,710. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-085) (CITY) D14. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Teamsters Local 1932 and Updating the Teamsters Local 1932 Salary Schedule. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-084) (CITY) D15. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-087) (CITY) E.CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION F.ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1. Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of San Bernardino and Participating Cities for the West End Regional Navigation Center, and Consideration of an Allocation in the Amount of $400,000 from Eligible Funding Sources for the Regional Navigation Center, including $300,000 for the City's Annual Contribution and $100,000 for Transportation Services. (CITY) G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing to Consider a Request to Redevelop and Expand an Existing Beverage Distribution Facility Over Two Phases to Include Production, Bottling and Distribution Operations and Other Site Improvements, Including a Parking Garage and New Water Well, on Approximately 30.1 Acres of Land Generally Bounded by Haven Avenue to the West, 7th Street to the North, Utica Avenue to the East, and 6th Street to the South within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone. APN: 0209-411-002. -003, -004, -023, -024, -032, -034, -035. An Environmental Impact Report Has Been Prepared for This Project (SCH2023080369). (Related Records: a Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068) and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-086) (CITY) H.CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) I.COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) 85 91 96 129 159 --- --- CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 6 J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 9 October 15, 2025 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member: Ashley Stickler. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development/Planning, Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. D/B/A ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: (3 CASES). THE CITY HAS RECEIVED THREE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS REGARDING THE CITY’S APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON CARRARI COURT. COPIES OF THE CLAIMS ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. (CITY)    Page 7 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 9 D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE). THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A DEMAND LETTER FROM COUNSEL FOR MARJANI BUILDERS. INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY’S TERMINATION OF MARJANI’S CONTRACT FOR THE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER REHABILITATION PROJECT. A COPY OF THE LETTER IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. (CITY) D5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 POTENTIAL CASE. (CITY) D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7089 AND 7092 ETIWANDA AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0227-121-56-0000, AND 0227-121-55-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD HAMM, PELICAN COMMUNITIES; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:23 p.m. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on October 15, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member: Ashley Stickler. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Hutchison led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS None. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Margaret Vizio, shared concerns about a rezoning proposal presented at the October 1, 2025 City Council meeting. Lance Asbra, offered a prayer.    Page 8 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 9 Daniel De Pol, shared concerns over increasing mobile home rent, spoke about the importance of affordable housing for senior citizens and terms of the Accord entered between mobile home park owners and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He encouraged the City Council to pursue a new Accord or enact rent control. Mr. De Pol provided materials for the City Council’s review. Fourteen (14) speakers: Angela Espinoza, Miguel Espinoza, Liz Acuna, Laura Espinoza, Joann Cota, Steve Diaz, Robert Alvillar, Samuel Gracia, Matthew Gracia, Armando Moreno, Claudia Pieavo, LaVay Bland, Gail Walker and Julia Moreno spoke in opposition of the new Hamilton Family Brewery location at 8889 Archibald Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Speakers shared concerns about the brewery’s location near a residential area, non-compliance with conditions of approval, increased traffic, noise, parking overflow impacting local businesses and neighborhood, disruptive patron behavior, public intoxication, littering, erosion of residential feel, and impacts to public health, traffic and safety. Ryder Dunlap and Juliann Gomez, Alta Loma High School students, spoke about the increase in the homeless population and impacts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Michael thanked speakers for sharing their concerns and compelling arguments and assured the public that City staff and the City Council would look into the matter. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Scott abstained on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company. D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular and Special Meetings of October 1, 2025. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,506,905.24 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $14,510.76 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D4. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Van Scoyoc Associates to Provide Professional Legislative Representation, Federal Advocacy, and Lobbying Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY) D5. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement #2023 -179 with Data Ticket Inc. to Expand the Scope of Services to Include Online Permitting Services, and to Increase the Contract Not-to-Exceed Amount by $225,000 from $725,000 to $950,000 to Fund the Additional Scope of Services for the Remaining Term of the Agreement, with Options to Renew for an Additional Two (2) Years. (CITY) D6. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation (Project). This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY) D7. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the San Sevaine Trail Project Constructed Under the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Fontana for    Page 9 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 9 Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail Project (Contract No. 17- 029). (CITY) D8. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Attestation of Veracity for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-081) (CITY) D9. Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-082, Appointing a Representative and Alternate Representative to the California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) Board of Directors, and Predecessor Boards. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-082) (CITY) MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Agenda items D1 through D9, with Council Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 1047 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1047 by title only. Linda Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 1047. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1047 by title only. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler. F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) None.    Page 10 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 9 G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. PUBLIC HEARING - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS – A Request for Development of One Industrial Warehouse Building Totaling Approximately 334,776 Square Feet on a 14.8-Acre Site Located West of Etiwanda Avenue and South of Arrow Route at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229-131-24. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023110039) was Prepared for the Project. Primary Case File No. DRC2022-00101. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-079) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Sean McPherson, Principal Planner, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G1. Two (2) letters were received in support of item G1 by Jeff Modrzejewski from Care CA and Jacob Lopez from the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters; copies of the correspondence received were provided to the City Council and were available for the public to review on the City’s website. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. Applicant, Courtney Wing, Newcastle Partners, announced she was available to answer any questions and thanked staff and the City Council for their support and consideration of the project. Thomas Ruiz, representative of the Laborers International Union of North America, spoke in support of item G1 and creating well-paying union jobs in the region. Eleven (11) individuals: Juan Serrato, Fredrick Ortega, Pedro Velasquez, Ivan Vega, Jesse Moreno, Carlos Covarrubias, Vera Marin, Juan Gutierrez, Julie Luu, Jonathan Hernandez and Mario Valdovinos submitted speaker cards to show solidarity and support of item G1 and declined to speak . Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and adopt Resolution No. 2025 -079 of approval for Master Plan DRC2024-00036, Design Review DRC2022-00101 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00203 subject to the included Conditions of Approval. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler. G2. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed Annexation of Territory, (Annexation 88-25-1) into an Existing Community Facilities District, Adoption of Resolution Calling a Special Election, and Adoption of Resolution Declaring Results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88 -1. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-027 AND FD 2025-028) (FIRE) City Manager Gillison introduced Shane Adams, Fire Marshal, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G2. President Michael asked City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan to confirm that notice of public hearing was mailed and published in accordance with the law. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan affirmed that notice was mailed and published in accordance with the law. President Michael opened the Public Hearing to protests, comments and questions from interested persons, including persons owning property within Annexation No. 88 -25-1 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1.    Page 11 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 9 There were no public communications. President Michael asked City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan if any protests had been received. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan informed no protests had been received. President Michael asked City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan if any persons are registered to vote within Annexation No. 88-25-1, of Community Facilities District No. 88-1, and, if so, the number thereof. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan informed that the County of San Bernardino Registrar of Voters has certified that there are no registered voters within Annexation No. 88 -25-1 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1. President Michael asked City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan if the owner of all of the taxable property in Annexation No. 88-25-1 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 consented to holding the Special Election on October 15, 2025. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan replied, yes. President Michael asked City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan if she concurs that the Special Election may be held today, October 15, 2025. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary Troyan replied, yes. President Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Vice President Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Scott, to approve Resolution No. FD 2025-027, calling a Special Election Annexation 88-25-1. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Board Member Stickler. City Clerk Services Director/Fire Board Secretary opened the official ballot and announced all votes are in favor of the proposition presented on the ballot. MOTION: Moved by Vice President Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Scott, to approve Resolution No. FD 2025-028, declaring the results of Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 8 8-1, Annexation No. 88-25-1. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Quarterly Development Update - Third Quarter 2025. (CITY) John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Carina Campos, Management Analyst II, Darleen Cervera, Management Analyst I, and Alberto Felix, Traffic Engineer, who gave a Staff Report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H1. City Council received and filed report. H2. Consideration to Receive and File the Economic Development Strategy Annual Progress Report for 2024-2025. (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Tanya Spiegel, Deputy Director of Economic Development, and Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H2. City Council received and filed report.    Page 12 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 9 H3. Consideration to Receive and File the Garcia Park Field Lighting Project Community Engagement Report. (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Ryan Samples, Community Services Director, and Nathan Hunt, Deputy Director of Community Services, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H3. City Council received and filed report. Mayor Michael announced items H4 through H8 would be presented and acted upon concurrently by the City Council and Fire Board. H4. Consideration of First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No. 1048 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Adopting the 2025 Edition of the California Building (Model) Codes and the 2024 Edition of the International Building Codes and a Request to Set a Date for a Public Hearing for the Proposed Ordinance. (ORDINANCE NO. 1048 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025-080) (CITY) H5. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. FD -060, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Adopting by Reference the 2025 California Wildland -Urban Interface Code, With Errata, Together With Certain Changes, Modifications, Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions; Providing for the Issuance of Permits and Collection of Fees; and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination. (ORDINANCE NO. FD-060) (FIRE) H6. Consideration of Resolution No. FD 2025-026, Setting Forth the Findings that Allow the Board of Directors to Make Amendments and Other Changes to the 2025 California Fire Code by Approval of an Ordinance Adopting Said Fire Code. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025- 026) (FIRE) H7. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. FD -061, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Adopting by Reference the 2025 California Fire Code, With Errata, Together With Certain Changes, Modifications, Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions; Providing for the Issuance of Permits and Collection of Fees; Repealing Conflicting Ordinances; and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination. (ORDINANCE NO. FD-061) (FIRE) H8. Consideration of Resolution No. FD 2025-025, Setting Forth the Findings that Allow the Fire Board of Directors to Make Amendments and Other Changes to the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code by Approval of an Ordinance Adopting Said Wildland-Urban Interface Code. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-025) (FIRE) City Manager Gillison introduced Shane Adams, Fire Marshal, and Zack Neighbors, Building & Safety Services Director, who gave the staff report for items H4 through H8 in consecutive order, as listed on the agenda. MOTION: Moved by Council/Board Member Scott, seconded by Council/Board Member Hutchison, to approve staff’s recommendation for item H4, adopt Resolution No. 2025-080 and introduce Ordinance No. 1048 by title only and waive further reading. Linda Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 1048.    Page 13 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 8 of 9 ORDINANCE NO. 1048 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1 AND 2", 2024 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE", 2024 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE", 2024 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE", 2024 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE", 2026 EDITION, INCLUDING ANNEXES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE", INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2025 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE; AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS, ADDITIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES, AND AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council/Board Member Scott, seconded by Council/Board Member Hutchison, to approve staff’s recommendation for item H4, adopt Resolution No. 2025-080 and introduce Ordinance No. 1048 by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler. MOTION: Moved by Vice President Kennedy seconded by Board Member Scott, to approve staff’s recommendation for items H5-H8, adopt Resolution No. FD 2025-025 and FD 2025-026; and introduce Fire Board Ordinance Nos. FD-060 and FD-061 by title only and waive further readings. Linda Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No s. FD-060 and FD- 061. ORDINANCE NO. FD-060 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND- URBAN INTERFACE CODE, WITH ERRATA, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; AND APPROVING A CEQA EXEMPTION DETERMINATION ORDINANCE NO. FD-061 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, WITH ERRATA, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND APPROVING A CEQA EXEMPTION DETERMINATION VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Vice President Kennedy seconded by Board Member Scott, to Introduce First Reading of Ordinance Nos. FD-060 and FD-061, by title only and waive further readings. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Board Member Stickler.    Page 14 *DRAFT* October 15, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 9 of 9 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES Council Member Hutchison noted his attendance at a recent Solid Waste Advisory Task Force committee meeting where he received an update on the process and reimbursement of single use plastics. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS City Attorney Ghirelli noted no reportable action was taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:48 p.m. Approved: Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director    Page 15 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,716,842.83 for City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $9,534,663.44 Dated October 2, 2025, Through October 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,059,627.86 and $657,214.97 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $7,360,496.86 and $2,174,166.58 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register    Page 16 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 1 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Date On or After: 10/02/2025 Payment Date On or Before: 10/28/2025 Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454464 10/02/2025 C V W D 38,085.89 0 38,085.89 Supplier Payment: West Coast Arborists Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454466 10/02/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 255,143.76 0 255,143.76 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454383 10/02/2025 Cintas Corporation 1,207.10 0 1,207.10 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454465 10/02/2025 Southern California Edison 26,357.89 0 26,357.89 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454463 10/02/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 2,052.51 2,052.51 Supplier Payment: Allstar Fire Equipment Inc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/02/2025 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc 0 393.98 393.98 Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell Auto Service: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454445 10/02/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 4,143.00 0 4,143.00 Supplier Payment: Costar Realty Information Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454401 10/02/2025 Costar Realty Information Inc 1,915.80 0 1,915.80 Supplier Payment: All City Management Services Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 All City Management Services Inc 19,513.59 0 19,513.59 Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454417 10/02/2025 Minuteman Press 0 207.00 207.00 Supplier Payment: Re Astoria 2 Llc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Re Astoria 2 Llc 93,367.47 0 93,367.47 Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454416 10/02/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company 353.63 0 353.63 Supplier Payment: Alta Loma Animal Hospital: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454391 10/02/2025 Alta Loma Animal Hospital 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: Kingdom Calibrations Inc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454414 10/02/2025 Kingdom Calibrations Inc 0 95.00 95.00 Supplier Payment: Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454423 10/02/2025 Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc 4,200.00 0 4,200.00 Supplier Payment: State of California: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454437 10/02/2025 State of California 125.00 0 125.00 ATTACHMENT 1    Page 17 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 2 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454413 10/02/2025 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc 267,704.71 0 267,704.71 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454404 10/02/2025 Frontier Comm 1,267.21 0 1,267.21 Supplier Payment: California Ppe Recon Inc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/02/2025 California Ppe Recon Inc 0 19,034.00 19,034.00 Supplier Payment: Interstate All Battery Center: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454411 10/02/2025 Interstate All Battery Center 186.93 0 186.93 Supplier Payment: Odp Business Solutions Llc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454421 10/02/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 256.11 0 256.11 Supplier Payment: Southern California News Group: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454433 10/02/2025 Southern California News Group 3,390.39 0 3,390.39 Supplier Payment: West End Material Supply: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454444 10/02/2025 West End Material Supply 90.21 0 90.21 Supplier Payment: Vision Service Plan Ca: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454442 10/02/2025 Vision Service Plan Ca 11,445.91 0 11,445.91 Supplier Payment: Wirz & Company: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454446 10/02/2025 Wirz & Company 204.73 0 204.73 Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454408 10/02/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 457.56 0 457.56 Supplier Payment: Brightview Landscape Services Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Brightview Landscape Services Inc 50,917.62 0 50,917.62 Supplier Payment: Ascent Environmental Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454392 10/02/2025 Ascent Environmental Inc 43,710.42 0 43,710.42 Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454419 10/02/2025 Mwi Animal Health 582.71 0 582.71 Supplier Payment: Hinderliter De Llamas & Associates: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454407 10/02/2025 Hinderliter De Llamas & Associates 5,115.99 0 5,115.99 Supplier Payment: Kronos Inc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454415 10/02/2025 Kronos Inc 0 19,104.00 19,104.00 Supplier Payment: Executive Auto Detail: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454403 10/02/2025 Executive Auto Detail 0 300.00 300.00 Supplier Payment: Charter Communications: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454398 10/02/2025 Charter Communications 8,458.52 0 8,458.52 Supplier Payment: Inyo Networks Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454412 10/02/2025 Inyo Networks Inc 11,119.50 0 11,119.50 Supplier Payment: Odp Business Solutions Llc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454422 10/02/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 559.66 559.66    Page 18 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 3 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: T&B Planning Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454438 10/02/2025 T&B Planning Inc 5,271.25 0 5,271.25 Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Psa Print Group 52.21 0 52.21 Supplier Payment: New Urban Realty Advisors: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454420 10/02/2025 New Urban Realty Advisors 1,630.98 0 1,630.98 Supplier Payment: Grainger: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Grainger 3,534.64 0 3,534.64 Supplier Payment: Computershare Trust Company Na: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454399 10/02/2025 Computershare Trust Company Na 2,500.00 0 2,500.00 Supplier Payment: Concept Powder Coating: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454400 10/02/2025 Concept Powder Coating 290.00 0 290.00 Supplier Payment: International E-Z Up Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454410 10/02/2025 International E-Z Up Inc 2,037.70 0 2,037.70 Supplier Payment: R P Laurain & Associates Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454427 10/02/2025 R P Laurain & Associates Inc 4,500.00 0 4,500.00 Supplier Payment: Social Vocational Services: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Social Vocational Services 9,801.00 0 9,801.00 Supplier Payment: Ssi Technologies: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454435 10/02/2025 Ssi Technologies 1,586.25 0 1,586.25 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454405 10/02/2025 Frontier Comm 0 185.22 185.22 Supplier Payment: Zoobean Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454447 10/02/2025 Zoobean Inc 3,981.40 0 3,981.40 Supplier Payment: Nationwide Premium Holding: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Nationwide Premium Holding 1,262.04 0 1,262.04 Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga Employee Activities Committee: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454424 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Employee Activities Committee 18,000.00 0 18,000.00 Supplier Payment: Calif Intergovernmental Risk Authority: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/02/2025 Calif Intergovernmental Risk Authority 0 1,591,961.91 1,591,961.91 Supplier Payment: Dawson Productions Llc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Dawson Productions Llc 750.00 0 750.00 Supplier Payment: Gentry General Engineering Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Gentry General Engineering Inc 629.70 0 629.70 Supplier Payment: Burrtec Waste Industries Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454397 10/02/2025 Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 9,517.07 0 9,517.07 Supplier Payment: Golden State Risk Management Authority: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Golden State Risk Management Authority 147,102.00 0 147,102.00 Supplier Payment: AVI-SPL LLC: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454394 10/02/2025 AVI-SPL LLC 11,987.76 0 11,987.76    Page 19 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 4 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/02/2025 Psa Print Group 0 128.53 128.53 Supplier Payment: The Filharmonic LLC: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454439 10/02/2025 The Filharmonic LLC 10,350.00 0 10,350.00 Supplier Payment: AssetWorks Inc: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454393 10/02/2025 AssetWorks Inc 0 1,394.25 1,394.25 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino County Registrar Of Voters: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454428 10/02/2025 San Bernardino County Registrar Of Voters 465.57 0 465.57 Supplier Payment: Rialto Power Equipment Co: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454426 10/02/2025 Rialto Power Equipment Co 0 262.74 262.74 Supplier Payment: Braun Blaising & Wynne Pc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454396 10/02/2025 Braun Blaising & Wynne Pc 545.04 0 545.04 Supplier Payment: Base Line Animal Hospital: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454395 10/02/2025 Base Line Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Veterinary Anesthesia Support: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454441 10/02/2025 Veterinary Anesthesia Support 146.45 0 146.45 Supplier Payment: Mitchell 1: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454418 10/02/2025 Mitchell 1 5,448.00 0 5,448.00 Supplier Payment: C T & T Concrete Paving Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454402 10/02/2025 C T & T Concrete Paving Inc 414,828.27 0 414,828.27 Supplier Payment: Mariposa Landscapes Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 292,244.07 0 292,244.07 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Data Ticket Inc 359.36 0 359.36 Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet Hospital: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454406 10/02/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: South Coast Aqmd: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454432 10/02/2025 South Coast Aqmd 0 2,205.96 2,205.96 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454390 10/02/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 46.08 0 46.08 Supplier Payment: The Kindred Corporation: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454440 10/02/2025 The Kindred Corporation 530.78 0 530.78 Supplier Payment: Ninyo & Moore: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Ninyo & Moore 1,050.00 0 1,050.00 Supplier Payment: Springshare Llc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454434 10/02/2025 Springshare Llc 1,490.00 0 1,490.00 Supplier Payment: Abound Food Care: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454389 10/02/2025 Abound Food Care 4,268.91 0 4,268.91    Page 20 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 5 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Richards Watson & Gershon: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Richards Watson & Gershon 66,436.57 0 66,436.57 Supplier Payment: Standard Insurance Company: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454436 10/02/2025 Standard Insurance Company 36,588.50 0 36,588.50 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary Supply: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454443 10/02/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 68.11 0 68.11 Supplier Payment: 10KMLLC: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454388 10/02/2025 10KMLLC 18,600.00 0 18,600.00 Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga Town Square: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454425 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Town Square 20,248.27 0 20,248.27 Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths Inc: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 135.00 0 135.00 Supplier Payment: G/M Business Interiors: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/02/2025 G/M Business Interiors 249.30 0 249.30 Supplier Payment: Inland Empire Magazine: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454409 10/02/2025 Inland Empire Magazine 1,595.00 0 1,595.00 Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454429 10/02/2025 Shred Pros 140.00 0 140.00 Supplier Payment: Champion Fire Systems Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Champion Fire Systems Inc 1,443.88 0 1,443.88 Supplier Payment: Daniel A Moisa: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Daniel A Moisa 634.20 0 634.20 Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Sharon Ott 1,811.16 0 1,811.16 Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale Hardware: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454511 10/09/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 498.51 0 498.51 Supplier Payment: Edgar P Pazmino: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454489 10/09/2025 Edgar P Pazmino 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: G/M Business Interiors: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/09/2025 G/M Business Interiors 0 143.92 143.92 Supplier Payment: Zoll Medical Corporation: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454543 10/09/2025 Zoll Medical Corporation 0 1,683.27 1,683.27 Supplier Payment: Mdg Associates Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Mdg Associates Inc 10,408.50 0 10,408.50 Supplier Payment: AssetWorks Inc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454472 10/09/2025 AssetWorks Inc 0 31,782.33 31,782.33 Supplier Payment: Wheeling Park Commission: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454539 10/09/2025 Wheeling Park Commission 2,587.73 0 2,587.73    Page 21 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 6 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454478 10/09/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 100,346.69 0 100,346.69 Supplier Payment: Impact Southern California: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Impact Southern California 3,337.00 0 3,337.00 Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454502 10/09/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,084.81 0 1,084.81 Supplier Payment: E & S Towing Enterprises Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454487 10/09/2025 E & S Towing Enterprises Inc 640.00 0 640.00 Supplier Payment: Enko Systems Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454490 10/09/2025 Enko Systems Inc 8,962.14 0 8,962.14 Supplier Payment: Maria Elena Alvarez: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454510 10/09/2025 Maria Elena Alvarez 702.00 0 702.00 Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins Llp: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454477 10/09/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 4,303.90 0 4,303.90 Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454501 10/09/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 1,592.63 1,592.63 Supplier Payment: Express Brake Supply Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454494 10/09/2025 Express Brake Supply Inc 306.75 0 306.75 Supplier Payment: Karen Clark: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454507 10/09/2025 Karen Clark 960.00 0 960.00 Supplier Payment: Van Scoyoc Associates Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454533 10/09/2025 Van Scoyoc Associates Inc 4,000.00 0 4,000.00 Supplier Payment: Dive Rescue Inc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454485 10/09/2025 Dive Rescue Inc 0 2,322.10 2,322.10 Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis Academy: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 4,374.60 0 4,374.60 Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454508 10/09/2025 Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc 13,369.50 0 13,369.50 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino County Sheriffs Dept: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454523 10/09/2025 San Bernardino County Sheriffs Dept 1,994.70 0 1,994.70 Supplier Payment: Country Estate Fence Co Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454480 10/09/2025 Country Estate Fence Co Inc 15,615.25 0 15,615.25 Supplier Payment: Gail Materials: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454499 10/09/2025 Gail Materials 10,767.54 0 10,767.54 Supplier Payment: Ln Curtis & Sons: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454509 10/09/2025 Ln Curtis & Sons 0 9,212.63 9,212.63 Supplier Payment: Jordan Beck: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Jordan Beck 33,000.00 0 33,000.00 Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 59.01 0 59.01    Page 22 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 7 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Baker & Taylor Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454474 10/09/2025 Baker & Taylor Llc 166.32 0 166.32 Supplier Payment: Felicity USA Management Services LLC: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Felicity USA Management Services LLC 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: West End Material Supply: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454538 10/09/2025 West End Material Supply 295.80 0 295.80 Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory Printing Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 1,891.56 0 1,891.56 Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454525 10/09/2025 Shred Pros 210.00 0 210.00 Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards Corporation: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 113.27 0 113.27 Supplier Payment: Priority Dispatch Corp.: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454519 10/09/2025 Priority Dispatch Corp.0 1,944.81 1,944.81 Supplier Payment: Ebsco Information Services: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454488 10/09/2025 Ebsco Information Services 30,000.00 0 30,000.00 Supplier Payment: New Color Silk Screen: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454515 10/09/2025 New Color Silk Screen 150.31 0 150.31 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino County: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 San Bernardino County 27.00 0 27.00 Supplier Payment: Shred Pros: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454524 10/09/2025 Shred Pros 0 68.00 68.00 Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell Auto Service: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454541 10/09/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 1,203.67 0 1,203.67 Supplier Payment: Richard Vernon Ballesteros: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454521 10/09/2025 Richard Vernon Ballesteros 1,600.00 0 1,600.00 Supplier Payment: Diversified Communications: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454486 10/09/2025 Diversified Communications 2,595.00 0 2,595.00 Supplier Payment: Gentry General Engineering Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Gentry General Engineering Inc 35,739.90 0 35,739.90 Supplier Payment: Can/Am Technologies Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Can/Am Technologies Inc 70,699.20 0 70,699.20 Supplier Payment: Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454531 10/09/2025 Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc 6,456.97 0 6,456.97 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454497 10/09/2025 Frontier Comm 823.77 0 823.77 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Data Ticket Inc 9,079.05 0 9,079.05 Supplier Payment: Covetrus North America: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454481 10/09/2025 Covetrus North America 51.39 0 51.39    Page 23 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 8 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Costco Pharmacy #0678: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454479 10/09/2025 Costco Pharmacy #0678 1,279.68 0 1,279.68 Supplier Payment: Terra Vista Animal Hospital: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454530 10/09/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Velocity Truck Centers: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454534 10/09/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 0 4,615.49 4,615.49 Supplier Payment: Advanced Utility Systems Corp: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454468 10/09/2025 Advanced Utility Systems Corp 56,304.00 0 56,304.00 Supplier Payment: Antelope Expansion 3B Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Antelope Expansion 3B Llc 5,478.70 0 5,478.70 Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454513 10/09/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 407.97 0 407.97 Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco Electric Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 5,210.00 0 5,210.00 Supplier Payment: Gaston Co/ Code Red Headsets: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Gaston Co/ Code Red Headsets 2,588.26 0 2,588.26 Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Jorry Keith 45.00 0 45.00 Supplier Payment: Department Of Justice: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454483 10/09/2025 Department Of Justice 915.00 0 915.00 Supplier Payment: Ida Tyus: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Ida Tyus 1,071.00 0 1,071.00 Supplier Payment: Brightview Landscape Services Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Brightview Landscape Services Inc 22,380.75 0 22,380.75 Supplier Payment: Robert Morales: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454522 10/09/2025 Robert Morales 209.75 0 209.75 Supplier Payment: John A Gilkey: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454505 10/09/2025 John A Gilkey 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Midwest Tape Llc 4,166.03 0 4,166.03 Supplier Payment: Bpr Consulting Group Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Bpr Consulting Group Llc 13,012.06 0 13,012.06 Supplier Payment: Auntie M Creative Consultants Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454473 10/09/2025 Auntie M Creative Consultants Inc 1,467.86 0 1,467.86 Supplier Payment: Air Exchange Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Air Exchange Inc 3,099.62 0 3,099.62 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County Janitorial Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454476 10/09/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial Inc 264.70 0 264.70 Supplier Payment: Alta Rancho Pet & Bird Hospital: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454470 10/09/2025 Alta Rancho Pet & Bird Hospital 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454469 10/09/2025 Alma Arocho 1,027.20 0 1,027.20    Page 24 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 9 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Adapt Consulting Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454467 10/09/2025 Adapt Consulting Inc 1,525.00 0 1,525.00 Supplier Payment: D & K Concrete Company: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454482 10/09/2025 D & K Concrete Company 1,788.65 0 1,788.65 Supplier Payment: Such A Voice Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454528 10/09/2025 Such A Voice Llc 21.00 0 21.00 Supplier Payment: Richards Watson & Gershon: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Richards Watson & Gershon 38,180.62 0 38,180.62 Supplier Payment: Delta Dental Insurance Company: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Delta Dental Insurance Company 1,111.98 0 1,111.98 Supplier Payment: Mariposa Landscapes Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 1,477.51 0 1,477.51 Supplier Payment: Enma P Campos: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454491 10/09/2025 Enma P Campos 1,612.50 0 1,612.50 Supplier Payment: Flock Group Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454496 10/09/2025 Flock Group Inc 76,800.00 0 76,800.00 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary Supply: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454537 10/09/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 7,895.27 0 7,895.27 Supplier Payment: Allstar Fire Equipment Inc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/09/2025 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc 0 4,547.16 4,547.16 Supplier Payment: Wilson Fiallos: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454542 10/09/2025 Wilson Fiallos 1,920.00 0 1,920.00 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Napa Auto Parts 1,633.16 0 1,633.16 Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454503 10/09/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 390.06 0 390.06 Supplier Payment: Tripepi Smith & Associates Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454532 10/09/2025 Tripepi Smith & Associates Inc 7,295.00 0 7,295.00 Supplier Payment: Christopher Pellitteri: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Christopher Pellitteri 238.00 0 238.00 Supplier Payment: Experian: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454493 10/09/2025 Experian 50.00 0 50.00 Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454498 10/09/2025 Fuel Serv 2,066.97 0 2,066.97 Supplier Payment: 360 Deep Cleaning Llc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/09/2025 360 Deep Cleaning Llc 0 9,230.00 9,230.00 Supplier Payment: Ginger Dollarhide: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Ginger Dollarhide 342.00 0 342.00 Supplier Payment: Enterprise Rent-A- Car: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454492 10/09/2025 Enterprise Rent-A-Car 0 2,419.16 2,419.16    Page 25 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 10 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Anne Marie Dunn: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Anne Marie Dunn 504.00 0 504.00 Supplier Payment: Willdan Group: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454540 10/09/2025 Willdan Group 17,667.50 0 17,667.50 Supplier Payment: Burrtec Waste Industries Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454475 10/09/2025 Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 6,499.63 0 6,499.63 Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Psa Print Group 768.95 0 768.95 Supplier Payment: Interwest Consulting Group Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Interwest Consulting Group Inc 16,243.72 0 16,243.72 Supplier Payment: Monet Construction, Inc.: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454514 10/09/2025 Monet Construction, Inc.510,898.09 0 510,898.09 Supplier Payment: John Valenzuela: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454506 10/09/2025 John Valenzuela 0 400.00 400.00 Supplier Payment: Nv5 Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454516 10/09/2025 Nv5 Inc 13,510.00 0 13,510.00 Supplier Payment: Directv: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454484 10/09/2025 Directv 90.62 0 90.62 Supplier Payment: Odp Business Solutions Llc: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454517 10/09/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 1,220.47 1,220.47 Supplier Payment: Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454518 10/09/2025 Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc 5,000.00 0 5,000.00 Supplier Payment: Amtech Elevator Services: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454471 10/09/2025 Amtech Elevator Services 5,876.25 0 5,876.25 Supplier Payment: Best Best & Krieger Llp: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Best Best & Krieger Llp 252.00 0 252.00 Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials Company: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454535 10/09/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 288.35 0 288.35 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary Supply: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454536 10/09/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 0 7,434.61 7,434.61 Supplier Payment: Superior Pavement Markings Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454529 10/09/2025 Superior Pavement Markings Inc 6,670.90 0 6,670.90 Supplier Payment: Hollywood Skylights: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454504 10/09/2025 Hollywood Skylights 0 1,869.50 1,869.50 Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454512 10/09/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company 0 232.88 232.88 Supplier Payment: Helmets R Us: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454500 10/09/2025 Helmets R Us 2,023.40 0 2,023.40    Page 26 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 11 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Flag Systems Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454495 10/09/2025 Flag Systems Inc 2,675.00 0 2,675.00 Supplier Payment: Quadient Finance Usa Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454520 10/09/2025 Quadient Finance Usa Inc 6,000.00 0 6,000.00 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison - Remit-To: RCMU: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454527 10/09/2025 Southern California Edison 4,414.09 0 4,414.09 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison - Remit-To: RCMU: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454526 10/09/2025 Southern California Edison 959.32 0 959.32 Supplier Payment: Oclc Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454547 10/09/2025 Oclc Inc 99.69 0 99.69 Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454544 10/09/2025 C V W D 73,876.83 0 73,876.83 Supplier Payment: Grainger: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Grainger 3,303.88 0 3,303.88 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454549 10/09/2025 Southern California Edison 0 6,060.29 6,060.29 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: 10/09/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/09/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 1,783.88 1,783.88 Supplier Payment: Assi Security: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/09/2025 Assi Security 3,615.00 0 3,615.00 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454548 10/09/2025 Southern California Edison 53,730.48 0 53,730.48 Supplier Payment: General Code Llc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454545 10/09/2025 General Code Llc 1,903.00 0 1,903.00 Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy Systems Inc: 10/09/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454546 10/09/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 25,482.47 0 25,482.47 Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy Systems Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454620 10/16/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 2,348.25 0 2,348.25 Supplier Payment: Anne Marie Dunn: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Anne Marie Dunn 392.00 0 392.00 Supplier Payment: Vinyl Mayhem: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454658 10/16/2025 Vinyl Mayhem 103.48 0 103.48 Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Repertory Theatre: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Inland Valley Repertory Theatre 22,483.60 0 22,483.60 Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454574 10/16/2025 Alma Arocho 475.20 0 475.20 Supplier Payment: Grainger: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Grainger 2,235.93 0 2,235.93    Page 27 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 12 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Core Strengths Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454585 10/16/2025 Core Strengths Inc 5,525.00 0 5,525.00 Supplier Payment: Eighth Avenue Enterprise Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454592 10/16/2025 Eighth Avenue Enterprise Llc 4,894.16 0 4,894.16 Supplier Payment: Brightview Landscape Services Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Brightview Landscape Services Inc 48,232.56 0 48,232.56 Supplier Payment: Willdan Group: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454665 10/16/2025 Willdan Group 52,546.50 0 52,546.50 Supplier Payment: Cummins Sales & Service: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454587 10/16/2025 Cummins Sales & Service 0 840.00 840.00 Supplier Payment: Environment Planning Dvmt Solutions: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454594 10/16/2025 Environment Planning Dvmt Solutions 2,156.25 0 2,156.25 Supplier Payment: Baker & Taylor Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454576 10/16/2025 Baker & Taylor Llc 246.50 0 246.50 Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 3,173.75 0 3,173.75 Supplier Payment: Jordan Beck: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Jordan Beck 16,000.00 0 16,000.00 Supplier Payment: Dawn Triche Bisek: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Dawn Triche Bisek 367.20 0 367.20 Supplier Payment: Gonzalez Party & Event Rentals Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454603 10/16/2025 Gonzalez Party & Event Rentals Inc 1,635.00 0 1,635.00 Supplier Payment: Mdg Associates Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Mdg Associates Inc 7,650.00 0 7,650.00 Supplier Payment: Antelope Expansion 3B Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Antelope Expansion 3B Llc 16,052.07 0 16,052.07 Supplier Payment: G&G Laser Works: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454601 10/16/2025 G&G Laser Works 355.58 0 355.58 Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454623 10/16/2025 Minuteman Press 0 231.66 231.66 Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/16/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 50.40 50.40 Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga Chamber Of Commerce: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454636 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber Of Commerce 10,500.00 0 10,500.00 Supplier Payment: Southern California News Group: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454642 10/16/2025 Southern California News Group 2,314.50 0 2,314.50 Supplier Payment: Dependable Break Room Solutions Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454588 10/16/2025 Dependable Break Room Solutions Inc 101.46 0 101.46    Page 28 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 13 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Advanced Chemical Transport Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454573 10/16/2025 Advanced Chemical Transport Inc 868.50 0 868.50 Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness Repair Shop: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454582 10/16/2025 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 325.24 0 325.24 Supplier Payment: Lawrence W. Rosine Co.: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454614 10/16/2025 Lawrence W. Rosine Co.192,848.00 0 192,848.00 Supplier Payment: Modern Marketing: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454624 10/16/2025 Modern Marketing 0 446.50 446.50 Supplier Payment: Two Cups of TLC, LLC: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454652 10/16/2025 Two Cups of TLC, LLC 25,000.00 0 25,000.00 Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins Llp: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454583 10/16/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 14,590.00 0 14,590.00 Supplier Payment: MES Service Company: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454621 10/16/2025 MES Service Company 0 2,348.19 2,348.19 Supplier Payment: Factory Motor Parts: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454595 10/16/2025 Factory Motor Parts 0 1,950.34 1,950.34 Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors Ontario Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454581 10/16/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 213.28 0 213.28 Supplier Payment: Towill Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454649 10/16/2025 Towill Inc 46,754.50 0 46,754.50 Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco Electric Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 174,671.66 0 174,671.66 Supplier Payment: Covetrus North America: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454586 10/16/2025 Covetrus North America 1,758.46 0 1,758.46 Supplier Payment: Iland Internet Solutions: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Iland Internet Solutions 1,827.50 0 1,827.50 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/16/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 1,457.38 1,457.38 Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards Corporation: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 615.58 0 615.58 Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Llp: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454615 10/16/2025 Lozano Smith Llp 1,674.00 0 1,674.00 Supplier Payment: Assi Security: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Assi Security 2,207.33 0 2,207.33 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454599 10/16/2025 Frontier Comm 796.05 0 796.05 Supplier Payment: West End Material Supply: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454663 10/16/2025 West End Material Supply 632.45 0 632.45    Page 29 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 14 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Sterling Coffee Service: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454644 10/16/2025 Sterling Coffee Service 843.08 0 843.08 Supplier Payment: Shasta College: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454639 10/16/2025 Shasta College 0 495.00 495.00 Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Jorry Keith 252.00 0 252.00 Supplier Payment: Absolute Security International Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Absolute Security International Inc 8,447.67 0 8,447.67 Supplier Payment: Oclc Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454632 10/16/2025 Oclc Inc 16,005.55 0 16,005.55 Supplier Payment: Gentry General Engineering Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Gentry General Engineering Inc 393,276.47 0 393,276.47 Supplier Payment: Kathy Espinoza: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454612 10/16/2025 Kathy Espinoza 1,000.00 0 1,000.00 Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454607 10/16/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,337.16 0 1,337.16 Supplier Payment: Globalstar Usa: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454602 10/16/2025 Globalstar Usa 182.18 0 182.18 Supplier Payment: Delta Dental Of California: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Delta Dental Of California 45,688.51 0 45,688.51 Supplier Payment: Firefighters' Safety Center Inc: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454596 10/16/2025 Firefighters' Safety Center Inc 0 641.32 641.32 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454598 10/16/2025 Frontier Comm 0 558.00 558.00 Supplier Payment: Westbound Communications Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454661 10/16/2025 Westbound Communications Inc 25,641.31 0 25,641.31 Supplier Payment: Tryfytt: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454651 10/16/2025 Tryfytt 887.00 0 887.00 Supplier Payment: Haulaway Storage Containers Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454604 10/16/2025 Haulaway Storage Containers Inc 87.36 0 87.36 Supplier Payment: Braun Blaising & Wynne Pc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454577 10/16/2025 Braun Blaising & Wynne Pc 479.25 0 479.25 Supplier Payment: Stotz Equipment: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454645 10/16/2025 Stotz Equipment 1,674.44 0 1,674.44 Supplier Payment: Constellation Energy Generation Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Constellation Energy Generation Llc 860,808.00 0 860,808.00 Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor Power Inland Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland Llc 20.44 0 20.44 Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454619 10/16/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company 526.18 0 526.18    Page 30 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 15 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest Control: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454643 10/16/2025 Stanley Pest Control 650.00 0 650.00 Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Dance Academy: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454610 10/16/2025 Inland Valley Dance Academy 691.20 0 691.20 Supplier Payment: Ekahau, Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Ekahau, Inc 1,995.00 0 1,995.00 Supplier Payment: Handtevy Pediatric Emergency Standards: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/16/2025 Handtevy Pediatric Emergency Standards 0 796.00 796.00 Supplier Payment: San Gabriel Valley Water Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454638 10/16/2025 San Gabriel Valley Water Company 2,963.88 0 2,963.88 Supplier Payment: G/M Business Interiors: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 G/M Business Interiors 454.05 0 454.05 Supplier Payment: Never Stop Grinding Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454630 10/16/2025 Never Stop Grinding Llc 1,700.00 0 1,700.00 Supplier Payment: Fleetcrew: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454597 10/16/2025 Fleetcrew 553.00 0 553.00 Supplier Payment: Able Building Maintenance: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454572 10/16/2025 Able Building Maintenance 10,130.00 0 10,130.00 Supplier Payment: Verizon Wireless - La: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454657 10/16/2025 Verizon Wireless - La 5,125.07 0 5,125.07 Supplier Payment: Verizon Business: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454656 10/16/2025 Verizon Business 0 14,424.28 14,424.28 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454580 10/16/2025 Cintas Corporation 1,054.68 0 1,054.68 Supplier Payment: Brendon Fung: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Brendon Fung 12,282.50 0 12,282.50 Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454584 10/16/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 1,114.40 0 1,114.40 Supplier Payment: Diamond Environmental Services: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Diamond Environmental Services 1,243.60 0 1,243.60 Supplier Payment: Mariposa Landscapes Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 49,021.27 0 49,021.27 Supplier Payment: Enma P Campos: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454593 10/16/2025 Enma P Campos 1,612.50 0 1,612.50 Supplier Payment: Pedrag V. Pecic: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Pedrag V. Pecic 3,000.00 0 3,000.00 Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric Company Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 409.29 0 409.29 Supplier Payment: Occupational Health Centers Of Ca: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454631 10/16/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of Ca 1,528.00 0 1,528.00    Page 31 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 16 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Edgar P Pazmino: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454591 10/16/2025 Edgar P Pazmino 850.00 0 850.00 Supplier Payment: Fun Service: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454600 10/16/2025 Fun Service 1,770.50 0 1,770.50 Supplier Payment: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454617 10/16/2025 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.30,418.47 0 30,418.47 Supplier Payment: American Asphalt South, Inc.: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454575 10/16/2025 American Asphalt South, Inc.4,817.97 0 4,817.97 Supplier Payment: Placeworks: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Placeworks 7,735.50 0 7,735.50 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454641 10/16/2025 Southern California Edison 1,147.59 0 1,147.59 Supplier Payment: G/M Business Interiors: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/16/2025 G/M Business Interiors 0 676.78 676.78 Supplier Payment: Carol Jean Bourland: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Carol Jean Bourland 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: Dmv Renewal: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454590 10/16/2025 Dmv Renewal 0 77.00 77.00 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County Janitorial Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454578 10/16/2025 Ccs Orange County Janitorial Inc 81,384.12 0 81,384.12 Supplier Payment: Wirz & Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454667 10/16/2025 Wirz & Company 170.25 0 170.25 Supplier Payment: Power & Telephone Supply Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454634 10/16/2025 Power & Telephone Supply Company 11,553.24 0 11,553.24 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary Supply: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454660 10/16/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 6,658.72 0 6,658.72 Supplier Payment: Anderson'S Playschool: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Anderson'S Playschool 4,290.00 0 4,290.00 Supplier Payment: Ginger Dollarhide: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Ginger Dollarhide 84.00 0 84.00 Supplier Payment: Motive Energy Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454625 10/16/2025 Motive Energy Llc 324.45 0 324.45 Supplier Payment: The Sign Shop: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454646 10/16/2025 The Sign Shop 12.93 0 12.93 Supplier Payment: Heritage Wellness Collective: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454605 10/16/2025 Heritage Wellness Collective 1,096.00 0 1,096.00 Supplier Payment: Pramira Inc.: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454635 10/16/2025 Pramira Inc.13,093.35 0 13,093.35 Supplier Payment: Champion Awards & Specialties: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454579 10/16/2025 Champion Awards & Specialties 64.65 0 64.65    Page 32 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 17 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454647 10/16/2025 Tirehub Llc 0 614.61 614.61 Supplier Payment: Mariachi Continental de San Diego: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454616 10/16/2025 Mariachi Continental de San Diego 9,600.00 0 9,600.00 Supplier Payment: Hampton Living: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Hampton Living 666.00 0 666.00 Supplier Payment: Itron Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454611 10/16/2025 Itron Inc 11,759.84 0 11,759.84 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Data Ticket Inc 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: West Coast Arborists Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454662 10/16/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 15,011.29 0 15,011.29 Supplier Payment: Ups: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Ups 194.79 0 194.79 Supplier Payment: Champion Fire Systems Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Champion Fire Systems Inc 758.00 0 758.00 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Napa Auto Parts 1,990.49 0 1,990.49 Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454622 10/16/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 3,974.66 0 3,974.66 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Cty Fire Protection Dist: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454637 10/16/2025 San Bernardino Cty Fire Protection Dist 3,727.00 0 3,727.00 Supplier Payment: Kids Imagine Entertainment: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454613 10/16/2025 Kids Imagine Entertainment 1,800.00 0 1,800.00 Supplier Payment: Hi-Line Electric Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454606 10/16/2025 Hi-Line Electric Company 47.04 0 47.04 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454640 10/16/2025 Southern California Edison 0 4,622.51 4,622.51 Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454659 10/16/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 852.50 0 852.50 Supplier Payment: Wilson Fiallos: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454666 10/16/2025 Wilson Fiallos 96.00 0 96.00 Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454627 10/16/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,109.01 0 1,109.01 Supplier Payment: Parkhouse Tire Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454633 10/16/2025 Parkhouse Tire Inc 940.23 0 940.23 Supplier Payment: Husky Boy Corporation: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454609 10/16/2025 Husky Boy Corporation 14,452.50 0 14,452.50 Supplier Payment: Unity Courier Service Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454653 10/16/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 341.98 0 341.98    Page 33 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 18 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Valley Power Systems Inc: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454654 10/16/2025 Valley Power Systems Inc 0 13.38 13.38 Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 455.38 0 455.38 Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454608 10/16/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 1,264.98 0 1,264.98 Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart Technology Solutions: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454626 10/16/2025 Mrc Smart Technology Solutions 11,443.60 0 11,443.60 Supplier Payment: Toro Towing: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454648 10/16/2025 Toro Towing 1,600.00 0 1,600.00 Supplier Payment: Transtech Engineers Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454650 10/16/2025 Transtech Engineers Inc 2,515.25 0 2,515.25 Supplier Payment: Myers Tire Supply Company: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454628 10/16/2025 Myers Tire Supply Company 23.93 0 23.93 Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale Hardware: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454618 10/16/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 418.58 0 418.58 Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Dlr Group Inc 9,144.48 0 9,144.48 Supplier Payment: Christopher Pellitteri: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Christopher Pellitteri 332.50 0 332.50 Supplier Payment: Directv: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454589 10/16/2025 Directv 288.23 0 288.23 Supplier Payment: Vendnovation Llc: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454655 10/16/2025 Vendnovation Llc 0 5,603.00 5,603.00 Supplier Payment: Nbs: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454629 10/16/2025 Nbs 7,000.00 0 7,000.00 Supplier Payment: Music Tree: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Music Tree 819.00 0 819.00 Supplier Payment: White Cap Lp: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454664 10/16/2025 White Cap Lp 262.12 0 262.12 Supplier Payment: Richards Watson & Gershon: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/16/2025 Richards Watson & Gershon 107,814.49 0 107,814.49 Supplier Payment: Odp Business Solutions Llc: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454670 10/16/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 3,036.51 0 3,036.51 Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/16/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454669 10/16/2025 C V W D 0 3,667.20 3,667.20 Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/16/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454668 10/16/2025 C V W D 15,204.54 0 15,204.54    Page 34 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 19 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Eric Noreen: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Eric Noreen 0 3,127.70 3,127.70 Supplier Payment: Absolute Security International Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Absolute Security International Inc 26,632.73 0 26,632.73 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454699 10/23/2025 Cintas Corporation 3,780.09 0 3,780.09 Supplier Payment: California Ppe Recon Inc: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 California Ppe Recon Inc 0 260.16 260.16 Supplier Payment: Lloyd Almand: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Lloyd Almand 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Brent Roberts: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Brent Roberts 0 1,086.55 1,086.55 Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards Corporation: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 325.10 0 325.10 Supplier Payment: Soca Arts: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454746 10/23/2025 Soca Arts 1,968.00 0 1,968.00 Supplier Payment: Workday Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Workday Inc 71,329.00 0 71,329.00 Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga Town Square: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454739 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Town Square 20,248.27 0 20,248.27 Supplier Payment: Continental Girbau West Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454702 10/23/2025 Continental Girbau West Llc 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: Aufbau Corporation: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Aufbau Corporation 56,752.50 0 56,752.50 Supplier Payment: Paul E Lenze: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Paul E Lenze 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Felicity USA Management Services LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Felicity USA Management Services LLC 216.00 0 216.00 Supplier Payment: Imagetrend Llc: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454719 10/23/2025 Imagetrend Llc 0 1,416.67 1,416.67 Supplier Payment: Ronald Smith: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Ronald Smith 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Alta Rancho Pet & Bird Hospital: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454693 10/23/2025 Alta Rancho Pet & Bird Hospital 600.00 0 600.00    Page 35 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 20 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Socal Gas - Remit- To: Yard - Socal Gas: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454749 10/23/2025 Socal Gas 1,459.15 0 1,459.15 Supplier Payment: New Color Silk Screen: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454733 10/23/2025 New Color Silk Screen 138.73 0 138.73 Supplier Payment: Zep Sales And Service: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454773 10/23/2025 Zep Sales And Service 1,443.15 0 1,443.15 Supplier Payment: Dennis M Costello: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Dennis M Costello 0 2,331.10 2,331.10 Supplier Payment: Tom O'Brien: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Tom O'Brien 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 Supplier Payment: Byron Morgan: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Byron Morgan 0 515.44 515.44 Supplier Payment: Verizon Wireless - La: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454762 10/23/2025 Verizon Wireless - La 3,011.60 0 3,011.60 Supplier Payment: Occupational Health Centers Of Ca: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454734 10/23/2025 Occupational Health Centers Of Ca 184.00 0 184.00 Supplier Payment: Danny G Holt: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Danny G Holt 0 1,730.68 1,730.68 Supplier Payment: Kenneth Mcneil: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Kenneth Mcneil 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Gerald Campbell: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Gerald Campbell 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Beverly Mackall: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Beverly Mackall 0 185.08 185.08 Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454756 10/23/2025 Tirehub Llc 826.12 0 826.12 Supplier Payment: Wilbur Crossland: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Wilbur Crossland 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454755 10/23/2025 Thompson Plumbing Supply Inc 113.53 0 113.53 Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory Printing Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 255.37 0 255.37 Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric Company Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Graybar Electric Company Inc 276.53 0 276.53    Page 36 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 21 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Donald R Cloughesy: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Donald R Cloughesy 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 Supplier Payment: Only Cremations For Pets Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454735 10/23/2025 Only Cremations For Pets Inc 2,268.00 0 2,268.00 Supplier Payment: John D Fritchey: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 John D Fritchey 0 658.62 658.62 Supplier Payment: Leighton Consulting Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454725 10/23/2025 Leighton Consulting Inc 5,173.75 0 5,173.75 Supplier Payment: Conor Consulting Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454701 10/23/2025 Conor Consulting Llc 656.25 0 656.25 Supplier Payment: Mary Jane Nelson: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Mary Jane Nelson 0 185.08 185.08 Supplier Payment: Advantage Sealing Systems Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454689 10/23/2025 Advantage Sealing Systems Inc 255.56 0 255.56 Supplier Payment: Timothy A Yowell: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Timothy A Yowell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Donald Heyde: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Donald Heyde 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Patrick Jerkins: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Patrick Jerkins 0 1,695.04 1,695.04 Supplier Payment: Charlene Dominick: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454698 10/23/2025 Charlene Dominick 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: PXT Studio LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 PXT Studio LLC 2,000.00 0 2,000.00 Supplier Payment: Roadway Asset Services, LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454744 10/23/2025 Roadway Asset Services, LLC 11,250.00 0 11,250.00 Supplier Payment: Ron Mayfield: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Ron Mayfield 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Country Estate Fence Co Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454704 10/23/2025 Country Estate Fence Co Inc 2,978.68 0 2,978.68 Supplier Payment: The Metropolitan Water District: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 The Metropolitan Water District 1,200.00 0 1,200.00 Supplier Payment: Richard Clabby: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Richard Clabby 0 817.12 817.12    Page 37 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 22 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Us Department Of Energy: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Us Department Of Energy 9,094.58 0 9,094.58 Supplier Payment: Darrell Luttrull: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Darrell Luttrull 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Rbm Lock & Key Service: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454742 10/23/2025 Rbm Lock & Key Service 28.28 0 28.28 Supplier Payment: Rosalyn Interlicchia: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Rosalyn Interlicchia 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Herc Rentals Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Herc Rentals Inc 3,630.10 0 3,630.10 Supplier Payment: Grainger: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Grainger 1,121.93 0 1,121.93 Supplier Payment: John Mckee: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 John Mckee 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: State of California: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454751 10/23/2025 State of California 900.00 0 900.00 Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454718 10/23/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 4,392.72 0 4,392.72 Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco Electric Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 39,368.00 0 39,368.00 Supplier Payment: Rapid Diesel Repair Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454741 10/23/2025 Rapid Diesel Repair Llc 4,730.46 0 4,730.46 Supplier Payment: Terra Vista Animal Hospital: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454753 10/23/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Onward Engineering: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454736 10/23/2025 Onward Engineering 34,490.00 0 34,490.00 Supplier Payment: Golden State Risk Management Authority: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Golden State Risk Management Authority 150,150.00 0 150,150.00 Supplier Payment: Velocity Truck Centers: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454760 10/23/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 1,578.74 0 1,578.74 Supplier Payment: Cameron-Daniel Pc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454697 10/23/2025 Cameron-Daniel Pc 1,216.80 0 1,216.80 Supplier Payment: Jeffrey Roeder: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Jeffrey Roeder 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials Company: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454765 10/23/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 115.11 0 115.11 Supplier Payment: William M Kirkpatrick: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 William M Kirkpatrick 0 329.56 329.56    Page 38 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 23 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: East Valley Emergency Pet Clinic Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454708 10/23/2025 East Valley Emergency Pet Clinic Inc 150.00 0 150.00 Supplier Payment: All City Management Services Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 All City Management Services Inc 36,032.01 0 36,032.01 Supplier Payment: Jay Davenport: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Jay Davenport 0 3,077.83 3,077.83 Supplier Payment: David Freeman: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454707 10/23/2025 David Freeman 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Michael L Bell: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael L Bell 0 1,690.43 1,690.43 Supplier Payment: Peter Magnuson: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Peter Magnuson 0 1,685.46 1,685.46 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454691 10/23/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 449.64 0 449.64 Supplier Payment: James Dague: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 James Dague 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Anthony Varney: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Anthony Varney 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Barbara'S Answering Service: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454694 10/23/2025 Barbara'S Answering Service 552.00 0 552.00 Supplier Payment: Whittier Fertilizer: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454770 10/23/2025 Whittier Fertilizer 770.41 0 770.41 Supplier Payment: Joe Longo: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Joe Longo 0 185.08 185.08 Supplier Payment: Level 3 Communications Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454726 10/23/2025 Level 3 Communications Llc 4,042.44 0 4,042.44 Supplier Payment: City Of Riverside: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 City Of Riverside 6,909.00 0 6,909.00 Supplier Payment: Alexander R Ahumada: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Alexander R Ahumada 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Iland Internet Solutions: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Iland Internet Solutions 387.17 0 387.17 Supplier Payment: Southern California News Group: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454750 10/23/2025 Southern California News Group 2,666.34 0 2,666.34 Supplier Payment: Costar Realty Information Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454703 10/23/2025 Costar Realty Information Inc 2,009.67 0 2,009.67    Page 39 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 24 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Michael J Ploung: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael J Ploung 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 23,620.50 0 23,620.50 Supplier Payment: Imeg Consultants Corp: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454720 10/23/2025 Imeg Consultants Corp 418.00 0 418.00 Supplier Payment: Mig Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454730 10/23/2025 Mig Inc 50,679.60 0 50,679.60 Supplier Payment: Susan De Antonio: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Susan De Antonio 0 1,105.73 1,105.73 Supplier Payment: Francis Vanderkallen: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Francis Vanderkallen 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Humane Society Of San Bernardino Valley: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454717 10/23/2025 Humane Society Of San Bernardino Valley 212.00 0 212.00 Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454728 10/23/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply Company 463.90 0 463.90 Supplier Payment: Karl Cox: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Karl Cox 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: PKI Solutions LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 PKI Solutions LLC 116,250.00 0 116,250.00 Supplier Payment: Amazon Web Services Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Amazon Web Services Inc 3,103.24 0 3,103.24 Supplier Payment: Dennis Myskow: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Dennis Myskow 0 1,695.04 1,695.04 Supplier Payment: Viola Spagnolo: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454764 10/23/2025 Viola Spagnolo 0 329.56 329.56 Supplier Payment: West Coast Arborists Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454768 10/23/2025 West Coast Arborists Inc 51,819.83 0 51,819.83 Supplier Payment: Ralph Crane: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Ralph Crane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Philip Loncar: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Philip Loncar 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Hose Heaven: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454714 10/23/2025 Hose Heaven 162.66 0 162.66    Page 40 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 25 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Jackie Deans: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Jackie Deans 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Allied Universal Security Services: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454692 10/23/2025 Allied Universal Security Services 14,842.10 0 14,842.10 Supplier Payment: Kenneth Walker: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454724 10/23/2025 Kenneth Walker 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Scott D Sorensen: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Scott D Sorensen 0 1,671.25 1,671.25 Supplier Payment: Government Training Services: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Government Training Services 11,999.20 0 11,999.20 Supplier Payment: Kenneth Carnes: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Kenneth Carnes 0 185.08 185.08 Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell Auto Service: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454772 10/23/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 569.68 0 569.68 Supplier Payment: Patton Sales Corp: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454738 10/23/2025 Patton Sales Corp 130.59 0 130.59 Supplier Payment: Rancho West Animal Hospital: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454740 10/23/2025 Rancho West Animal Hospital 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: James Sullivan: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 James Sullivan 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Michael Redmond: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael Redmond 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 63,113.97 0 63,113.97 Supplier Payment: Susan Bazal: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Susan Bazal 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Verdantas Inc.: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454761 10/23/2025 Verdantas Inc.1,044.00 0 1,044.00 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino County: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454745 10/23/2025 San Bernardino County 0 14,028.78 14,028.78 Supplier Payment: Westbound Communications Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454767 10/23/2025 Westbound Communications Inc 15,197.49 0 15,197.49 Supplier Payment: Robin Brock: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Robin Brock 0 1,011.40 1,011.40    Page 41 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 26 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Michael Eagleson: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael Eagleson 0 1,671.25 1,671.25 Supplier Payment: Stotz Equipment: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454752 10/23/2025 Stotz Equipment 972.89 0 972.89 Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454706 10/23/2025 C V W D 0 359.90 359.90 Supplier Payment: Rio Hondo Community College District: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454743 10/23/2025 Rio Hondo Community College District 118.55 0 118.55 Supplier Payment: Steven Taylor: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Steven Taylor 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 Supplier Payment: Cheryl L Roberts: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Cheryl L Roberts 0 3,077.83 3,077.83 Supplier Payment: Tim Fejeran: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Tim Fejeran 0 2,250.95 2,250.95 Supplier Payment: Graves & King Llp: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Graves & King Llp 3,602.50 0 3,602.50 Supplier Payment: Confire Jpa: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Confire Jpa 0 304,492.93 304,492.93 Supplier Payment: David Berry: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 David Berry 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Victoria Bantau: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Victoria Bantau 0 690.62 690.62 Supplier Payment: Vanad Training and Consulting, LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454758 10/23/2025 Vanad Training and Consulting, LLC 3,600.00 0 3,600.00 Supplier Payment: Richard Toll: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Richard Toll 0 3,127.70 3,127.70 Supplier Payment: Van Scoyoc Associates Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454759 10/23/2025 Van Scoyoc Associates Inc 4,000.00 0 4,000.00 Supplier Payment: Patrick Proulx: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Patrick Proulx 0 1,690.43 1,690.43 Supplier Payment: William Spain: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 William Spain 0 528.16 528.16    Page 42 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 27 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Imperial Sprinkler Supply Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454721 10/23/2025 Imperial Sprinkler Supply Inc 199.74 0 199.74 Supplier Payment: L. Dennis Michael: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 L. Dennis Michael 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary Supply: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454766 10/23/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 10,414.53 0 10,414.53 Supplier Payment: William Lane: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 William Lane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Allan J Lee: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Allan J Lee 0 426.70 426.70 Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454731 10/23/2025 Mwi Animal Health 3,229.92 0 3,229.92 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454710 10/23/2025 Frontier Comm 347.70 0 347.70 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Napa Auto Parts 11.85 0 11.85 Supplier Payment: Bon Air Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454696 10/23/2025 Bon Air Inc 56,944.93 0 56,944.93 Supplier Payment: Terry Tuley: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Terry Tuley 0 2,369.46 2,369.46 Supplier Payment: Valsoft Corporation Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Valsoft Corporation Inc 26,216.00 0 26,216.00 Supplier Payment: Advanced Utility Systems Corp: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454688 10/23/2025 Advanced Utility Systems Corp 86,389.24 0 86,389.24 Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454729 10/23/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 4,489.52 0 4,489.52 Supplier Payment: Victor Rodriguez: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454763 10/23/2025 Victor Rodriguez 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454690 10/23/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 429.55 429.55 Supplier Payment: Michael R Post: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael R Post 0 2,331.10 2,331.10 Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454712 10/23/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales Inc 1,860.54 0 1,860.54 Supplier Payment: Westland Group Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454769 10/23/2025 Westland Group Inc 19,901.25 0 19,901.25    Page 43 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 28 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Willdan Group: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454771 10/23/2025 Willdan Group 54,729.25 0 54,729.25 Supplier Payment: Bmla Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454695 10/23/2025 Bmla Inc 53,538.89 0 53,538.89 Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 161.55 0 161.55 Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454713 10/23/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 3,697.97 0 3,697.97 Supplier Payment: Toro Towing: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454757 10/23/2025 Toro Towing 250.00 0 250.00 Supplier Payment: Pape Material Handling: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454737 10/23/2025 Pape Material Handling 238.75 0 238.75 Supplier Payment: ADP, Inc.: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454687 10/23/2025 ADP, Inc.208.50 0 208.50 Supplier Payment: Fehr & Peers: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Fehr & Peers 3,035.00 0 3,035.00 Supplier Payment: Steven Campbell: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Steven Campbell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Inland Overhead Door Company: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454722 10/23/2025 Inland Overhead Door Company 8,353.00 0 8,353.00 Supplier Payment: Katie Wellins: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454723 10/23/2025 Katie Wellins 1,250.00 0 1,250.00 Supplier Payment: Newco Distributors Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454732 10/23/2025 Newco Distributors Inc 1,386.53 0 1,386.53 Supplier Payment: Michael Nauman: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Michael Nauman 0 528.16 528.16 Supplier Payment: Kevin Walton: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Kevin Walton 0 658.62 658.62 Supplier Payment: Thomas Salisbury: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Thomas Salisbury 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Stephen Kilmer: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Stephen Kilmer 0 768.52 768.52 Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454715 10/23/2025 Hose-Man Inc 84.00 0 84.00 Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10/23/2025 Yunex Llc 75,103.25 0 75,103.25    Page 44 06:11 PM 10/28/2025 Page 29 of 29 Council Meeting Check Register - without SoCal Gas Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Robert Eggers: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Robert Eggers 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: James Curatalo: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 James Curatalo 0 1,011.40 1,011.40 Supplier Payment: Enko Systems Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454709 10/23/2025 Enko Systems Inc 247.50 0 247.50 Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454700 10/23/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 57,150.54 0 57,150.54 Supplier Payment: The Leneker Team, LLC: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454754 10/23/2025 The Leneker Team, LLC 5,384.03 0 5,384.03 Supplier Payment: David W Larkin: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 David W Larkin 0 768.52 768.52 Supplier Payment: Ivan M Rojer: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10/23/2025 Ivan M Rojer 0 1,695.04 1,695.04 Supplier Payment: Hr Green Pacific Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454716 10/23/2025 Hr Green Pacific Inc 7,120.00 0 7,120.00 Supplier Payment: Covetrus North America: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454705 10/23/2025 Covetrus North America 1,893.86 0 1,893.86 Supplier Payment: Gateway Pet Cemetery & Crematory: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454711 10/23/2025 Gateway Pet Cemetery & Crematory 892.00 0 892.00 Supplier Payment: Marisa Maverhan- Lane: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454727 10/23/2025 Marisa Maverhan-Lane 1,400.00 0 1,400.00 Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies Inc: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454777 10/23/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 15,316.52 0 15,316.52 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454774 10/23/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 1,912.16 1,912.16 Supplier Payment: C V W D: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454775 10/23/2025 C V W D 58,597.51 0 58,597.51 Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest Control: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454779 10/23/2025 Stanley Pest Control 4,275.00 0 4,275.00 Supplier Payment: Southern California Edison: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454778 10/23/2025 Southern California Edison 35,828.06 0 35,828.06 Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies Inc: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454776 10/23/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 0 840.12 840.12 7,360,496.86 2,174,166.58 9,534,663.44    Page 45 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $7,856.51 Dated October 2, 2025, Through October 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $7,105.31 and $751.20 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register    Page 46 10/28/2025 Company: City & Fire Payment Date On or After: 10/02/2025 Payment Date On or Before: 10/28/2025 Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas 05:52 PM Page 1 of 1 Supplier Payment Company Check Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Payment Amount for Reporting Transaction Supplier Payment: Socal Gas: 10/02/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454431 10/02/2025 Socal Gas 1,293.87 0 1,293.87 Supplier Payment: Socal Gas: 10/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454430 10/02/2025 Socal Gas 0 328.35 328.35 Supplier Payment: Socal Gas: 10/23/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 454748 10/23/2025 Socal Gas 0 422.85 422.85 Supplier Payment: Socal Gas: 10/23/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 454747 10/23/2025 Socal Gas 5,811.44 0 5,811.44 7,105.31 751.20 7,856.51 ATTACHMENT 1    Page 47 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy City Clerk Services Director Jasmin Oriel, CMC, CPMC, Management Analyst SUBJECT:Consideration to Cancel the January 7, 2026, Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, and City Council. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council cancel the January 7, 2026 Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, and City Council. BACKGROUND: The City Council serves as the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Its Regular Meetings are held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month. ANALYSIS: A Regular City Council meeting is scheduled for January 7, 2026. However, the city will be closed for the holidays from December 24, 2025, to January 4, 2026. Given the proximity to the holiday closure and the lack of availability to prepare adequately for the meeting, staff recommends canceling the January 7, 2026, meeting. This decision aligns with past practices of the city. The city will hold two regular meetings in December and one in January, so canceling the January 7 meeting will not affect city business. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item maintains organizational efficiency and planning to help advance the quality of life for the community through inclusive decision-making. ATTACHMENTS: None.    Page 48 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager-Administrative Services Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT:Consideration to Declare Computers, Monitors, Laptops, Printers, and iPads, That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council declare the listed computers, monitors, laptops, printers, and iPads that have been deemed no longer needed, obsolete or unusable as surplus. BACKGROUND: Per the City's Municipal Code Section 3.08.150, the Procurement Manager shall have the authority, granted by the City Council, to request to dispose of City items that have been deemed obsolete and unsuitable for City use. Methods for disposing of surplus are to exchange for or trade in on new supplies, transfer to another department, or offer for sale on a competitive bid basis. After a reasonable effort, and if no bids have been received, Procurement may dispose of surplus for the highest scrap value. The City may sell surplus property to any other governmental agency at a fair market value without any other bids or donate surplus property to any agency or entity which is exempt from federal income tax, with the approval of City Council. ANALYSIS: The items to be considered for surplus were submitted by the Department of Innovation & Technology. Staff has reviewed all items listed for surplus, determined that the listed items are no longer needed, obsolete, or unusable. Staff recommends City Council approve the disposal of these items through auction or best method as determined by the Procurement Manager. F/A No.Description Make/Model Serial No. NONE Xerox Printer WorkCentre 3335 5BT729641 NONE Xerox Printer WorkCentre 3550 VMA574473 NONE Xerox Printer WorkCentre 3550 VMA574466 NONE HP Printer Business InkJet 1100 CN461220MX5F 1568 Samsung Monitor C23F39 0P4KHTQHC03673W    Page 49 Page 2 3 1 4 0 NONE Samsung Monitor LS24E 0513HCHM401473Z NONE PLANAR Monitor PLL2010MW PGQJG8JJ000026 6856 Apple iPad GG7YLCTCJF88 6189 Intel NUC NUC6i5syk G6SY70100BY6 6328 HP Printer Laser Jet Pro M402n PHBHJ15909 6826 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ096E1V 6965 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A44VS 6247 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10HY002AUSMJ0594ST 7165 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B0H 7014 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AXE 7175 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B05 6796 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ08Q5BC 7260 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0BE8YS 6572 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ07PE05 7160 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AVL 7162 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B0E 7141 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AW2 7051 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AXM 7153 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AZQ 7282 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0BE8YV 7028 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B09 6964 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A44WA 7054 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AW3 7029 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AZZ 7164 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B0K 7212 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AZM 6850 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0910GT 7010 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AYL 6782 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ08Q59W 6986 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AWB 6542 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ07K7MW 7060 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AVS 7133 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AYY 7140 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AWR 7052 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AVT 6963 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A44W0 6769 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ08Q5A3 7158 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AXX 6677 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ08B5E8 7452 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0DXPEL 7168 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B02 7138 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4B0J 7009 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AYP    Page 50 Page 3 3 1 4 0 7018 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AW9 7454 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0DXPEQ 7169 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AY2 7455 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0DXPEP 7031 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AVZ 7134 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A44W7 7170 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AYV 7152 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A44VV 6539 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ07K7MS 7089 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0A4AYS 6541 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ07K7MY 6922 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0910H7 7457 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0DXPEN 6893 Lenovo Tiny M920Q 1S10RRS0Q700MJ0910H9 6245 Lenovo Tiny M700 1S10HY002AUSMJ05AFW0 6248 Lenovo Tiny M700 1S10HY002AUSMJ0594SZ 6246 Lenovo Tiny M700 1S10HY002AUSMJ05AFUZ 6243 Lenovo Tiny M700 1S10HY002AUSMJ0594RJ 6242 Lenovo Tiny M700 1S10HY002AUSMJ0594S0 6444 Lenovo Tiny M910Q 1S10MUS6B700MJ076XKM 6445 Lenovo Tiny M910Q 1S10MUS6B700MJ076XKL 4487 HP Tower Z420 2UA2480XF3 8586 APC UPS X750 AS2345155899 NONE ACER Monitor V22HQL MMLY7AA0043450A35D8510 NONE ACER Monitor V22HQL MMLY7AA0043450A35C8510 NONE ACER Monitor V22HQL MMLY7AA0043450A6A38510 NONE ACER Monitor V22HQL MMLY7AA0043450A3658510 NONE Samsung Monitor U32J5 092EHCJT704110N 5491 HP Printer LaserJet M553 CNBCH7J20Q IS00863 HP Printer LaserJet Pro 200 Color VNB3C32645 4542 Xerox WorkCentre 5335 AE9884230 FISCAL IMPACT: Surplus has accumulated $117,095.56 in sales through the public surplus auction site in Fiscal Year 2025/2026. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Reusing and recycling items supports the City Council's Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: None.    Page 51 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Wess Garcia, Library Director Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration of the Recommendation from the Library Board of Trustees to Name the Relocated Archibald Library to the Diane Williams Library at Lions Park. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council consider the recommendation from the Library Board of Trustees to name the Relocated Archibald Library to the Diane Williams Library at Lions Park. BACKGROUND: The origin of Lions Center on Baseline, just two blocks from the old Growers Service and Supply Company, had its beginning in 1950, when the Lions, looking to the future, purchased the five- acre lot. The property needed water rights in order to make improvements. With diligent effort of the club’s first president, Carl Massingale (1947-1949), Arthur Allen, the club’s second president (1949-1950), and a very inspired membership the land was cleared, and water rights were obtained. The Lions also dedicated a street on the west property line, which to this day is known as Lions Street. The first order of business was San Bernardino County’s request for a library in Cucamonga. The club took this in stride and in due time financed a building, negotiated an agreement with the county and in 1964, the San Bernardino County Library opened on the Lion’s property. As the community grew, the County asked for a larger building in 1974. The Lions opted to transfer the property and building to the county, with stipulations that it always must remain a community service facility. Lion George Parker, a 40-year plus member, was instrumental in entering this requirement into the transfer and paved the way for the eventual transfer from the County to the City. In 1977, with the incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the County was forced to transfer the buildings and property to the newly incorporated City. Along with the County’s improvements and the City’s two remodeled facilities, the community dedicated Lion Center East in January of 1998 and Lions Center West in October of the same year. The main entrance to Lions Center West displays a plaque dedicated to the Host Lions and in the main hall the display case contains many of the club’s trophies and miscellaneous Lions memorabilia collected over the last 58 years. The Filippi Room, on the northeast corner of Lions West is the original county library.    Page 52 Page 2 3 1 2 2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga is relocating the existing Archibald Library to the City-owned Lions Center East and West facility, currently referred to as the Westside Library Expansion Project. Since the library will no longer be located on Archibald Avenue, staff recommends changing the library’s name to avoid causing potential confusion for visitors. Per the City’s Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy (Section C.2), “first preference is to provide easy and recognizable reference for City residents based on the location and designated function of the facility,” and “if the site is near a geographical landmark, it may be named for that landmark if it is not adjacent to a school site.” This newly renovated, state-of-the-art library will feature expanded community spaces, a larger Library of Things collection, and outdoor event areas designed to promote learning, engagement, and accessibility for all residents. Situated adjacent to Lions Park, the site will also offer ample space for outdoor programming. In alignment with the City’s Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy, the Library Board of Trustees approved the recommendation to name the relocated Archibald Library the Diane Williams Library at Lions Park during their board meeting on October 2, 2025. The proposed name meets the naming guidelines outlined in the Policy. ANALYSIS: Diane Williams served the community of Rancho Cucamonga for over 28 years, including seven consecutive terms on the City Council. She helped found the Friends of the Library which marked the start of the successful effort to break away from the county library system and form a city library. She remained an active member and also served as the former President of the Friends of the Library, where she championed numerous efforts to increase public access to literacy and educational resources. Williams' leadership helped guide Rancho Cucamonga through significant phases of growth, and her passion for inclusive, community-oriented spaces left an impact on public programs, particularly in education and culture. According to the Policy, commemorative naming may be granted to individuals who have made “distinguished and significant contributions to the community that resulted in positive, lasting impacts”. Additionally, for elected officials, commemorative naming is eligible one year after their term ends, unless waived by the City Council under extenuating circumstances. Diane Williams retired from the City Council in 2018, meeting the timing and eligibility requirements. Naming the new library after Diane Williams recognizes her legacy and aligns with the City’s values of service, education, and inclusivity. It would also ensure future generations are reminded of her contributions and the importance of civic leadership in shaping Rancho Cucamonga’s future. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts related to naming the relocated Archibald Library. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Naming the relocated Archibald Library to the Diane Williams Library at Lions Park aligns with building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, relentless pursuit of improvement, and providing and nurturing an excellent quality of life for all – all of which are exemplified by Diane Williams’ decades of service, advocacy for education, and unwavering commitment to the Rancho Cucamonga community.    Page 53 Page 3 3 1 2 2 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy    Page 54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy RANCHO CucAMONGA CALIFOR IA A.PURPOSE PAGE: EFFECTIVE: APPROVED: REVISED: Page 1 of 5 November 1, 2011 October 17, 2011 October 2, 2024 The following policy is to be used in the naming of parks, facilities and facility amenities owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To ensure that parks, facilities and amenities paid for and operated by public funds have clear guidelines for establishing names and identity, this policy establishes uniform and consistent evaluation of dedication and naming requests and to ensure that this honor is bestowed in an equitable manner and based on common criteria supported by compelling reasons. All naming must be congruent with overall strategic mission, vision and values for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Final approval of all naming is the responsibility of the City Council unless otherwise stated. Additionally, the policy sets forth guidelines for allocation of sponsorship naming rights for accepting and recognizing contributions through Sponsor Agreements developed through fundraising campaigns. B. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall be in effect for this policy: •Public Parks and Open Space: City owned parks, open space and trails. •Recreational Community Facilities: City owned buildings that are used primarily for recreational or cultural activities. •Other Community Facilities: City owned facilities used to conduct city business or provide services that are not recreational or cultural in nature. •Facility Amenities: Portions of City owned properties subject to naming including rooms, courtyards, sport fields and significant architectural elements of a facility. Site furnishings, equipment or fixtures are excluded from this policy. C. NAMING CATEGORIES/CRITERIA The following factors shall be considered in the naming of any park, open space, facility or amenity: 1. General Conditions and Exclusions •Naming that promotes unhealthy lifestyles, including but not limited to alcohol or tobacco use will not be considered. •Naming that promotes any political organization will not be considered. ATTACHMENT 1    Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY PAGE 2 Re-naming of City facilities is strongly discouraged and can only be considered when compelling circumstances exist. The Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter is excluded from this policy. Its naming guidelines are subject to the terms and conditions of the tenant lease with the resident minor league baseball team. The Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center is not available for naming opportunities; however amenities within the building may receive Commemorative Naming. 2. Geographical Location, Historical Designation & Designated Facility Function First preference is to provide easy and recognizable reference for City residents based on the location and the designated function of the park or facility. If a park site or facility is located next to a school and the school has been officially named, it may bear the same name. If the school has not been named, the City shall work with the School District on a mutually agreed upon name. If the park site or facility is near a geographical landmark it may be named for that landmark if it is not adjacent to a school site. A park or facility may be named for an adjacent street or commemorative event if it is not located next to a school site or significant geological or historic element. If the park site or facility is near a historical site or landmark, it may be named for that site. A park site, facility or amenities may be named after individuals or organizations if they have contributed significantly to the development of the park, amenity, general park system or other City project or program. 3. Termination of Naming Rights Due to the high profile nature of public facilities, diligence and discretion must be exercised in their naming. Significant review and higher standard of care will be applied in the use of a name of an individual, organization or business. The City reserves the right to reject any sponsor requests or naming request at any time during the approval process. The City Council may remove a name from a park, open space, trail, building, or portion thereof, structure, equipment or furnishing when deemed by the City Council to be in the best interest of the City. The City Council reserves the right to suspend the use of a Commemorative Name or terminate a Sponsor Agreement in the case of circumstances involving fraud, poor moral character, criminal activity or other actions which would reflect poorly on the reputation, image or good-will of the City. Additionally, should a corporate entity cease to exist, their naming rights may be terminated. D. NAMING DESIGNATIONS – COMMEMORATIVE AND SPONSORSHIPS Individuals, families, organizations or businesses recognized shall be defined as either a Commemorative designation (for outstanding civic contributions) or Sponsorship designation (in exchange for financial contribution). City Hall is excluded from either Commemorative or Sponsorship naming opportunities. Existing parks or facilities with a Commemorative name are Page 41    Page 56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY PAGE 3 excluded from Sponsorship naming, however amenities at existing parks or facilities maybe considered. 1. Commemorative Naming Honorarium/Memorial – includes the use of a name of an individual, family or organization (not associated with Sponsorship Agreements) for the purpose of recognizing distinguished and significant contributions to the community that resulted in positive, lasting impacts. Preference is that Commemorative Naming be done in conjunction with Geographical and Functional Naming. Commemorative Naming shall be done in a manner that ensures that there is broad support for the naming and a general knowledge that the contributions of the individual, family or organization are extraordinary. Extreme care and diligence must be exercised in application of this policy to ensure that the selection of honorees will withstand the test of time. Nominees for Commemorative Naming (individuals, families and organizations) are subject to background investigations to ascertain and affirm that their character represents the integrity and service to the community that warrants such a privilege. See Policy Section on Elected Officials for clarification of Commemorative Naming involving individuals serving in an elected office capacity. 2. Sponsorship Naming Rights Sponsorship Naming Rights includes naming in exchange for a significant donation from a business, organization or individual to recognize philanthropic support, whether through an affiliate non-profit Foundation or through the City. In evaluating Sponsorship Naming Rights associated with an approved fundraising campaign, the following guidelines are to be adhered to: The City may enter into agreements with non-profits that allow the organization to solicit contributions towards construction or operation of a City park or facility. Organizations affiliated with the City that desire to raise funds for a City sponsored project must receive City Council approval prior to soliciting naming opportunities. The non-profits may assist the City in negotiating terms of the gift. Staff will prepare a recommendation to the appropriate City Council Subcommittee who will make a final recommendation to the City Council. Sponsors will be required to enter into a Sponsorship Agreement with the City and appropriate Foundation establishing terms and conditions, payment schedules, donor status and recognition levels, duration of naming and termination of rights. Sponsorships will not be considered from any donor whose purpose or conduct would reasonably demean the reputation, image or good-will of the City. Potential sponsorships will be evaluated in terms of their possible negative impact on soliciting and obtaining additional sponsors in the future. Sponsors should not be considered if such approval would likely result in a significant reduction in future sponsors. Page 42    Page 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY PAGE 4 Sponsorships, and wording on donor recognition/individual appeal plaques, will not be considered which could place the staff, boards, committees, City Council, or the City in any potential or perceived conflict of interest. Sponsorships will only be approved with corporations, organizations or individuals who wish to contribute, based solely on their support of the mission and objectives of the City. While acknowledgement of the sponsor’s official business, name and/or affiliation is important for positive appreciation, the donor recognition program, including wording used on donor recognition/individual appeal plaques, shall not be allowed for marketing or advertisement of specific products, projects or campaigns. See Policy Section on Elected Officials for clarification of Sponsorship Naming involving individuals serving in an elected office capacity. E. COMMEMORATIVE OR SPONSORSHIP NAMING INVOLVING ELECTED OFFICIALS Extreme care is to be used in consideration of naming a public park or facility in recognition of elected public officials. 1. Commemorative Naming Guidelines for Elected Officials To be considered for Commemorative Naming of a park, facility or amenity in the name of a Federal, State or Local elected official for their contributions associated with their elected office, the individual must not have served in elected office for which they are being recognized for at least one year. Exceptions are at the discretion of the City Council and will only be considered when extenuating circumstances exists. 2. Sponsorship Naming Guidelines for Elected Officials For the purposes of recognizing a financial contribution through a negotiated sponsor agreement through an approved fundraising campaign, a building, room or amenity may bear the name of an elected official if specific conditions are met, including approval of a formal written agreement outlining the terms and conditions of the Naming Rights. The individual must not have served in the elected office from which they assisted with the financial contribution for at least one year. Final approval is at the discretion of the City Council. F. APPROVAL PROCESS Initiation of naming can occur at the Department level or by a member of the community. City staff may solicit community input for the naming of a public facility or commence an ad hoc committee for a planned project. Naming opportunity recommendations shall be forwarded for approval to the City Council from the appropriate Department, Board, Committee or Commission. Depending upon the park or facility beginning considered for naming, the following guidelines apply: Page 43    Page 58 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY PAGE 5 1. Park or Recreational Facility or Amenity General naming or Commemorative naming opportunities for parks and recreational or cultural facilities shall be researched by the Community Services Department and taken for review to the Park and Recreation Subcommittee. The Subcommittee will forward a final recommendation to the City Council for approval. Sponsorship naming rights for recreational or cultural facilities shall be solicited and negotiated by the Community Services Department and taken for review to the Park and Recreation Subcommittee. The Subcommittee will forward a final recommendation to the City Council for approval. 2. Library Facility or Amenity General naming or Commemorative naming opportunities for library facilities shall be researched by the Library Services Department and taken for review to the Library Board of Trustees. The Board will forward a final recommendation to the City Council for approval. Sponsorship naming rights for library facilities shall be solicited and negotiated by Special Campaign Committee in conjunction with the Library Services Department and taken for review to the Library Board of Trustees. The Board will forward a final recommendation to the City Council for approval. 3. Other Facilities or Amenities General naming opportunities for other facilities shall be reviewed by the appropriate Department and forwarded to the City Council for final approval. Sponsorship naming rights for other facilities shall be solicited and negotiated by the appropriate Department and forwarded to the City Council for final approval. Page 44    Page 59 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager-Community Development Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer Ulises Benavente, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of a Reimbursement Request Submitted by Core Rancho, LLC For Undergrounding Existing Overhead Utilities along the North Side of Foothill Boulevard, West of East Avenue, Related to Case No. SUBTT19945 and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $156,400 from the Underground Utilities Fund (129). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Approve the request for reimbursement for undergrounding existing overhead utilities along the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of East Avenue submitted by Core Rancho, LLC; and 2. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $156,400 from the Underground Utilities Fund (129). BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTT19945 for the development of a 193-unit mixed-use development with 3,246 square feet of commercial space on eight (8) acres of vacant land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The project was conditioned to underground the existing overhead utilities, with the exception for 66KV electrical lines, starting from the first pole offsite east of East Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the western project boundary along the north side of Foothill Boulevard. The developer can request a reimbursement to recover the collected monies from what the developer on the opposite side paid for as an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of said utilities after acceptance of the improvements. ANALYSIS: On October 5, 2009, the City collected a total amount of $156,400 in-lieu fees from the San Sevaine Villas development on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, related to Case No. DRC2006-00540, which may be used to reimburse Core Rancho, LLC. The monies collected covers the full limits of undergrounding that Core Rancho, LLC completed. On October 1, 2025, City Council accepted the public improvements which included the undergrounding scope of work.    Page 60 Page 2 3 1 1 3 FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount of $156,400 that was collected from the San Sevaine Villas development may be reimbursed to Core Rancho, LLC for completing the undergrounding. Due to the nature of reimbursement requests in the utility undergrounding program, it is difficult to anticipate the budget requirements on an annual basis. Funds have not been included in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget and appropriations from the Underground Utilities Fund (129) are requested on a case-by-case basis. An appropriation in the amount of $156,400 from Fund No. 129 into Account No. F129-CC303-SC7004 (Infrastructure) is necessary to fund this reimbursement request. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive through the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map Attachment 2 – Letter Request    Page 61 ATTACHMENT 1 Case No. SUBTT19945 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE    Page 62 CORE RANCHO, LLC 5773 Woodway Drive, #415 Houston, Texas 77057 (832) 879-2074 July 28, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: DRC2006-00540 - San Sevaine Villas Utility In-Lieu Fee To Whom it May Concern: Core Rancho, LLC completed and received City final permit inspection approval on 7-10-25 that included the underground work along the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of East Avenue. Core Rancho, LLC now requests reimbursement of the 10-5-2009 San Sevaine Villas $156,400.00 In-Lieu Utility Undergrounding Fee payment to the City from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please make the check payable to Core Rancho, LLC and mail it to the address listed above. Sincerely, James M. Hinton Authorized Signatory    Page 63 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager-Community Development Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer Ulises Benavente, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Parcel Map No. 20894 Related to Case No. SUBTPM20894, Located on the Southeast Corner of Eighth Street and Cottage Avenue. This Item Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council to approve Parcel Map No. 20894. BACKGROUND: On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTPM20894 (Project) for the subdivision of 5.85 acres of developed land into four (4) lots located on the southeast corner of Eighth Street and Cottage Avenue. ANALYSIS: The owner, Chase Partners, has submitted a final map for consideration of approval. Staff has determined that the final map is in substantial conformity with the approved Tentative Map of Case No. SUBTPM20894 and conditions. Approval of this item by the City Council would approve Parcel Map No. 20894 and allow its recordation. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA) and the City’s local Guidelines, the Planning Director determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions, which consists of the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for industrial use into four (4) or fewer parcels given the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous two (2) years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than twenty percent. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project, which is the subdivision of land resulting in no construction, will have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact.    Page 64 Page 2 3 1 1 1 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive through the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map    Page 65 ATTACHMENT 1 Case No. SUBTPM20894 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE    Page 66 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager - Community Development Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Danny Akers, Deputy Director of Public Works Richard Favela, St/Storm Maintenance Superintendent Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer John Standi, Streets Coordinator / Project Manager SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Rehabilitation Project FY 24-25 as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Accept the Citywide Concrete Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 2024-215, as complete. 2. Approve the final contract amount of $1,322,277.59 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,189,010.95, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. 5. Authorize the Public Works Service Director to file a Notice of Completion and release the Project retention, 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the Public Works Service Director to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship BACKGROUND: On October 15, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Gentry General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $1,189,010.95 plus 11% contingency in the amount of $132,709.05 to address unforeseen construction-related incidentals. A copy of the October 15, 2024, City Council staff report is on file with the City Clerk. The scope of work to be performed consists of, but not limited to, removal and replacement of existing concrete sidewalk, curb and gutters, drive approaches, and asphalt pavement.    Page 67 Page 2 3 1 0 9 The project had various approved funding sources as noted below: Bid Account No.Amount Base Bid a F001 CC318 7000 SC7004 (Street Maintenance)$475,000.00 Additive Bid b F131 CC318 7000 SC7004 (LMD-2 Victoria)$250,000.00 Additive Bid c F134 CC318 7000 SC7004 (LMD-4 Terra Vista)$200,000.00 Additive Bid d F134 CC318 7000 SC7004 (LMD-4 Terra Vista)$200,000.00 Additive Bid e F177 CC318 7000 SC7004 (Measure I - Fund 177)$100,000.00 Additive Bid f F174 CC318 7000 SC7004 State Gas Tax (Fund 174) $150,000.00 Additive Bid i F131 CC319 6600 SC2106 (LMD-2 Victoria)$76,000.00 Additive Bid k F134 CC319 6600 SC2106 (LMD-4 Terra Vista)$20,720.00 $1,471,720.00 ANALYSIS: The Project was completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Service Director. One (1) change order was issued during construction, resulting in a net increase of $35,739.90 to the contract amount. A detailed description of each contract change order is on file with the City’s Engineering Services Department. The final balancing statement resulted in a net increase of $133,266.64 to the final contract amount due to an increase in the final bid quantities of sidewalk being removed and replaced and one change order. The balancing statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. At the end of the one (1) year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. The final project construction cost is $1,372,277.59 as shown below: Expenditure:Amount Final Construction Contract $1,322,277.59 Construction Inspection Services (Onward)$43,030.00 Total Project Construction Cost $1,365,307.59 Construction support costs, including inspection and materials testing were approximately 3% of the final contract amount. Construction management services were performed in-house. As a result, a balance of $106,412.41 remains in the project budget. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended action will have no fiscal impact.    Page 68 Page 3 3 1 0 9 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: By removing and replacing damaged sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and drive approaches, the Citywide Concrete Rehabilitation Project provided continuous improvement and a nurturing and high quality of life for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map    Page 69 ATTACHMENT 1 Citywide Concrete Rehab Project FY24-25 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Sites    Page 70 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager-Community Development Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Sarine Hazarshahian, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project Constructed Under the Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) (CO 20-135). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council accept the Public Improvements for the 6th Street Cycle Track Project constructed under Contract No. 20-135 (Project), as complete. BACKGROUND: In December 2020, The City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) entered into a Cooperative Agreement (CO 20-135) for the design and construction of the Project. SBCTA was the lead agency for the design, construction, right-of-way, and funding of the Project which was Phase II of the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. The Project was primarily funded by a grant from the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4 and the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), and included work in the neighboring cities of Montclair, Upland, Fontana, and San Bernardino. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provided support services such as plan review and inspection and is the responsible party for operation and maintenance of the Project. The Cooperative Agreement also specified that the City was responsible for 25% of the Project cost. In June 2022, as the design was nearly complete, SBCTA’s design consultant prepared an updated project cost estimate. This is when the design consultant found that the construction cost exceeded the initial cost estimate. To ensure the success of the project, City and SBCTA Staff met and proposed an even split of the overage resulting in Amendment No.1 to CO 20-135. On July 1, 2024, SBCTA issued the Notice to Proceed to Griffith Construction Company. Construction of the Project within city limits started September 2024 and was substantially completed May 2025. ANALYSIS: The 1.75-mile Class IV Cycle Track on 6th Street begins at Haven Avenue and ends at Rochester Avenue. This cycle track provides residents with an enhanced connection along 6th Street to adjacent attractions including the Metrolink Station, the Resort development, and the Day Creek Channel Bike Trail.    Page 71 Page 2 3 1 2 3 The Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will assume maintenance of the Project upon Project acceptance by SBCTA as discussed under the Cooperative Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The final Project cost within the City of Rancho Cucamonga portion is $2,000,510 however the City portion of the contribution was $488,220 to cover the cost of construction expenses. The total funds for this Project were identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amounts listed below: Account No.Funding Source Description Amount F198 CC303 SC5650 PID2005-198 Infrastructure Fund (198) 6th Street Cycle Track Project $488,220 Total Project Funding $488,220 The total Project cost for the work in all five cities is $10,152,625. SBCTA used $6,132,000 from the ATP Cycle 4 grant and $3,100,000 of TIRCP funds. The remaining project cost was paid by the local match required from the participating cities. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map    Page 72 ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT# 800-2019-24 "6TH STREET CYCLE TRACK PROJECT” From Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue NOT TO SCALE Project Site Project Site    Page 73 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jennifer Gracia, Deputy City Manager-Community Programs Wess Garcia, Library Director SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept and Allocate Grant Revenue in the Amount of $3,078 Awarded by the California State Library for Zip Books Services. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve and allocate $3,078 awarded by the California State Library to directly support Zip Books Services through the purchase of additional materials. BACKGROUND: The Zip Books program supports multiple goals of the Library Services Department by providing cardholders with unique and popular titles in a timely manner, increasing opportunities for patron- driven acquisitions, and meeting the community's demand for diverse and inclusive collections. A patron simply requests an item of interest through the Library’s purchase request form, the library assigns it for purchase from the approved vendor, and the book is shipped directly to the patron’s home. When finished, the patron returns it to the Library, and the Library may add it to the materials collection. Because Zip Books is a user-driven program, the library collection becomes more closely matched to the needs of the local community. ANALYSIS: Approval of these grant funds will help pay for the acquisition of additional library collection materials and cover the related direct-to-patron shipping expenses. This is the fifth consecutive year that Rancho Cucamonga Library Services has received Zip Books funding support through the California State Library. FISCAL IMPACT: This grant provides $3,078 in additional funds from the California State Library to supplement the Library's materials budget and have been added as additional revenue to the FY 2025-2026 Budget. This grant does not require any additional City matching funding. $3,078 from this grant will be placed into Library revenue account F291|CC601|RC5102 and appropriated into Library expenditure accounts in the following manner: F291|CC601|SC1404 Operations & Maintenance $2,928 F291|CC601|SC2106 Contract Services $150    Page 74 Page 2 3 1 2 5 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: Providing superior library services to Rancho Cucamonga residents contributes to providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all. ATTACHMENTS: None.    Page 75 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager-Community Development Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer Ulises Benavente, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No. DRC2023-00322, Located at 8797 Hermosa Avenue (Project). This Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt From the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-083) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Case No. DRC2023-00322. BACKGROUND: On December 19, 2024, Case No. DRC2023-00322 (Project) was approved by the Planning Director for the construction of 2,385 single-story family residence with an attached 428 square- foot garage located at 8797 Hermosa Avenue, within the Low (L) Residential Zone. Per the City’s Municipal Code, it is required that the applicant sign the Consent and Waiver Form to annex the subject property into the appropriate Landscape and Maintenance Districts. ANALYSIS: The owner, Fortino Santana, has submitted the required Consent and Waiver to Annexation form to be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District 1. A copy of the form is on file with the City Clerk’s office. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning and Economic Development Department staff determined that the Project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The exemption covers the construction of single-family residences in a residential zone. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would supply additional annual revenue into Landscape Maintenance District in the following amount:    Page 76 Page 2 3 1 1 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: $92.21 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map Attachment 2 – Resolution Ordering Annexation LMD No. 1    Page 77 ATTACHMENT 1 Case No. DRC2023-00322 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE 8797 Hermosa Avenue Project Site    Page 78 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. DRC2023-00322 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and    Page 79 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable of the Territory.    Page 80 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 3 of 6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of ______________ 2025.    Page 81 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 4 of 6 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: TRES TOCAYOS, LLC The legal description of the Property is: NORTH CUCAMONGA S 1/2 LOTS 21 AND 23 BLK 60 Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0209-102-30-0000    Page 82 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 5 of 6 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2025/26 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the “Maintenance District”) represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD’s within the City. Typically, new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2023-00322: None.    Page 83 Resolution No. 2025-083 – Page 6 of 6 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2025/26 Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2025/26. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) for DRC2023-00322: Land Use Basis EBU* Factor Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $92.21 Multi-Family Residential Unit 0.50 92.21 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 92.21 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Parcel x 1 EBU Factor x $92.21 Rate per EBU = $92.21 Annual Assessment    Page 84 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Jevin Kaye, Finance Director Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer Romeo David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $79,500 for Independent Quality Control Design Services and San Bernardino County Permit Fees for the Heritage Park Pedestrian Bridges Replacement Project Phase 2; and Approval of Resolution No. 2025-085 Approving the Interfund Loan Agreement from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund (198) to the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) in a not- to-exceed Amount of $442,710. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-085) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Authorize an appropriation of expenditures for Independent Quality Control Design Services and San Bernardino County Permit Fees for the Heritage Park Bridges Replacement Project Phase 2 (Project) in the amount of $79,500 from the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848); and 2. Approve Resolution No. 2025-085, approving the interfund loan agreement in a not-to- exceed amount of $442,710 from the Infrastructure Fund (198) to the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) for design services and permitting costs as F848 has insufficient funds. BACKGROUND: On July 16, 2025, City Council awarded a contract to MNS Engineers for design and construction support services for the Project. The Project will replace two (2) bridges in Heritage Park crossing Demens Creek Channel and Rancho Wash Channel. One (1) of the bridges was damaged earlier this year and was closed immediately, the other is open however barriers restricting access to the center of the deck are in place due to damage on the extremity of the deck. A Vicinity Map illustrating the location of the Project is included in Attachment 1. ANALYSIS: Staff has selected Danken Construction Engineering Group to perform Independent Quality Control Design Services for the Project. Their scope includes independent calculations for the bridges and channel wall analysis, review of the final design package, and a constructability    Page 85 Page 2 3 1 3 1 review. A copy of the Professional Services Agreement is on file with the City Clerk’s office. Further, in the July 16, 2025 staff report, Council directed staff to prepare an inter-fund loan agreement from the Infrastructure Fund (198) to the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) to cover the cost of the design contract and permitting costs for the Project. The bridges within Heritage Park support recreational activity and access within the park, which is maintained and funded through the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848). However, the PD 85 Redemption Fund does not have a sufficient fund balance to cover the amount of the design contract, this contract, and permitting costs. Therefore, staff are recommending the interfund loan agreement (Attachment 2) be approved to cover these costs. Finally, staff was recently notified by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District that a fee in the amount of $10,000 will be required for permits related to the work in their right-of-way for the Project. This cost was not previously included in the project estimate and budget necessitating the need for an additional appropriation. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds were not initially budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget for this Project as the emergency work was not anticipated. Funds for the design work in the amount of $363,210 were appropriated from the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) in the July 16,2025 staff report however additional funds are required as described above. Staff is recommending that funding be appropriated toward the Project from the PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) for Independent Quality Control Design Services as shown below: Account No. Funding Source Description Amount F848 CC307 SC7004 PID2218-848 PD 85 Redemption Fund Independent Quality Control Design Services $69,500 F848 CC307 SC7004 PID2218-848 PD 85 Redemption Fund SB County Permit Fee $10,000 Total $79,500 The approval of the resolution authorizes an interfund loan in the not-to-exceed amount of $442,710 from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund (F198) to the PD-85 Fund (F848) to provide sufficient cash flow for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project. The loan will bear interest at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) quarterly apportionment rate, with principal and interest payments made quarterly over a ten-year term. Approval of this item also appropriates the transfer between the two funds as part of the FY 2025/26 operating budget as follows: Account No. Funding Source Description Amount F848 CC307 RC9000 TF198 PD 85 Redemption Fund Transfers In $442,710 F198 CC307 SC9000 TF848 Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund Transfers Out ($442,710)    Page 86 Page 3 3 1 3 1 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s core values by ensuring the construction of high-quality public improvements that promote success as a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 – Resolution No. 2025-085, Approving an Interfund Loan Agreement between the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund and PD-85.    Page 87 ATTACHMENT 1 Heritage Park Bridges Replacement Project – Phase 2 NOT TO SCALE Project Location Project Location    Page 88 Resolution No. 2025-085 – Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT FUND (F198) TO PD-85 (F848) IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $442,710, ESTABLISHING THE TERMS UNDER WHICH THE LOAN WILL BE REPAID WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) manages the Neighborhood Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. PD-85 was formed in 1985 and consists of single-family homes, condominiums, multi-family units, commercial, industrial, and vacant properties. Property owners pay an annual assessment of $31.00 to support the maintenance and capital costs of the Heritage Park and the Red Hill Community Park; and WHEREAS, the City is investing in the ongoing Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project at the Heritage Park. The bridges within Heritage Park support recreational activity and accessibility within the park, and provide emergency services access during staging for major emergency events; and WHEREAS, PD-85 currently lacks sufficient available cash to meet the expanded scope of the Heritage Bridge Replacement Project while meeting any necessary operational reserve requirements. The PD-85 fund does have sufficient projected annual revenue to meet the obligations associated with an advance of funds over a ten-year period; and WHEREAS, the City’s Infrastructure Improvement Fund is also providing funds for the Heritage Bridge Replacement Project and maintains adequate liquidity to support a temporary interfund advance; and WHEREAS, applicable Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) guidance authorizes temporary loans between City funds, provided such loans are made for specific purposes, bear a reasonable rate of interest, and are repaid from legally available revenues; and WHEREAS, the City’s financial policies permit the use of interfund loans as a cash-flow management tool, providing the lending fund will not be adversely impacted and the borrowing fund identifies a reliable repayment source and schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it prudent to base the interest rate for interfund loans on the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) quarterly apportionment rate, which reflects the market yield of the City’s pooled investments and represents an equitable rate of return to the lending fund; and WHEREAS, this temporary advance is intended to provide short-term liquidity to PD-85 pending the receipt of future assessments or other dedicated revenues, and the repayment of principal and accrued interest shall be completed within the period established in this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 5th day of November 2025, as follows: SECTION 1: The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby authorizes an interfund loan from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund to the PD-85 Fund in the not-to-exceed amount of $442,710 on the terms set forth in Exhibit A of this Resolution. The interfund loan shall be transferred from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund to the PD-85 Fund for use in its FY2025/26 operating budget.    Page 89 Resolution No. 2025-085 – Page 2 of 2 6 3 0 3 SECTION 3: Repayment of the interfund loan shall be made on a quarterly basis over a period not to exceed ten (10) years from the date of initial loan disbursement. Each quarterly payment shall include both principal and accrued interest, calculated based on the outstanding balance and current LAIF quarterly apportionment rate. Early repayment shall be permitted without penalty. The borrowing fund shall ensure sufficient annual budget appropriations to meet its scheduled repayment obligations. SECTION 4: The loan shall accrue interest at a variable rate equal to the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) quarterly apportionment rate as published by the California State Treasurer’s Office for each respective quarter. The applicable LAIF rate shall be updated at the close of each calendar quarter and applied to the outstanding principal balance for that period. Interest shall be computed on a simple interest basis, consistent with the City’s investment earnings methodology, and accrued interest shall be payable on a quarterly schedule concurrent with principal repayment. SECTION 5: The Finance Department is hereby authorized to administer this interfund loan, record the associated accounting entries, and adjust the quarterly interest rate in accordance with the published LAIF apportionment schedule. The Finance Director, or designee, shall monitor repayment compliance and report any material changes or repayment delays to the City Manager and City Council. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 2025.    Page 90 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Senior Human Resources Director Emily Nielsen, Senior Human Resources Business Partner SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Teamsters Local 1932 and Updating the Teamsters Local 1932 Salary Schedule. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-084) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Side Letter Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Teamsters Local 1932 and updating the Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule. BACKGROUND: The City Council previously approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Teamsters Local 1932, effective July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. In October of 2025, the City and Teamsters Local 1932 met and conferred in good faith and agreed to updated MOU language related to sick leave accrual for new employees. Effective July 14, 2025 the Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule was updated to incorporate the salary adjustments outlined in the MOU. These adjustments included a 5.75% increase to the Equipment Operator salary range and a 1.51% increase to the Lead Maintenance Worker salary range. As a result of these adjustments, a salary range discrepancy was created, wherein the Equipment Operator now has a higher salary range than its supervisory classification of Lead Maintenance Worker. ANALYSIS: The agreed amendment to Section 20 of the MOU: Sick Leave, provides 60 hours of sick leave to new employees at the time of hire. Employees will begin accruing additional sick leave at their seventh month of employment. This amendment will provide new employees with sick leave at the time of hire should the need to arise to use it. This will help in preventing employees from coming into work if they are sick or going on an unpaid status. The proposed amendment to the Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule will adjust the salary range for Lead Maintenance Worker to be 3% above the Equipment Operator classification. This    Page 91 Page 2 3 1 1 6 amendment restores the original salary range differential that existed prior to the adjustments implemented in July 2025, ensuring appropriate salary range alignment between supervisory and subordinate roles. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Side Letter Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Teamsters Local 1932, updating the sick leave accrual language. This Side Letter Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU will remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter Agreement. Effective November 17, 2025 the Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule will reflect the update to the Lead Maintenance Worker salary range. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the updated Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal Year impact for 2025-2026 is $13,809. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2025-084 - Side Letter Agreement and Teamsters Local 1932 Salary Schedule    Page 92 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 AND APPROVING UPDATED TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 SALARY SCHEDULE WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and Teamsters Local 1932 representatives have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of Meyers-Milias- Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and Teamsters Local 1932 have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Side Letter Agreement (see attached Side Letter Agreement), effective November 17, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of City policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Teamsters Local 1932 salary schedule (Exhibit A) and Side Letter Agreement (Exhibit B) with Teamsters Local 1932 are hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Side Letter Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ___________, 2025. ATTACHMENT 1    Page 93 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective November 17, 2025 Resolution No. 2025-XXX Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Amount Amount Amount Electrician $5,024 $6,221 $6,913 Equipment Operator $4,487 $5,608 $6,231 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat $3,599 $4,499 $4,999 Lead Maintenance Worker $4,393 $5,491 $6,418 Lead Mechanic $5,060 $6,325 $7,028 Maintenance Coordinator $4,900 $6,068 $6,742 Maintenance Worker $3,615 $4,474 $4,971 Mechanic $4,391 $5,437 $6,041 Senior Maintenance Worker $3,806 $4,758 $5,287 Signal & Lighting Coordinator $5,957 $7,447 $8,274 Signal & Lighting Technician $5,113 $6,391 $7,102 Exhibit A    Page 94 1 SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 The City of Rancho Cucamonga (''City''} and the Teamsters Local 1932 (collectively, the "Parties''} entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU'') that commenced on July I, 2025 and expires on June 30, 2026. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in October of 2025. The Parties agreed to amending MOU language related to sick leave accrual for new employees. SECTION 20: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. Employees will receive 60 hours of sick leave at the time of hire. Additional sick leave accrual will not begin until the employee’s seventh month of employment. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Teamsters Local 1932. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga For the Teamsters Local 1932 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ John Gillison Carlos Gonzales City Manager Business Representative Exhibit B    Page 95 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager Robert Neiuber, Senior Human Resources Director Emily Nielsen, Senior Human Resources Business Partner SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-087) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving an 18-month Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA). BACKGROUND: The City Council previously approved a twelve-month MOU between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and RCCEA, effective January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. In August 2025, the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association began negotiations to the MOU. After meeting and conferring in good faith, the City and RCCEA came to a tentative agreement. ANALYSIS: The parties agreed to an 18-month MOU, which includes the following: 2.5% cost of living adjustment (COLA) effective the first full pay period of July 2026 and a 2% cost of living adjustment (COLA) effective the first full pay period of June 2027. Adjustments to the minimum and maximum of the salary ranges for all RCCEA positions to align with market averages as determined by the salary survey. Adjustments to the minimum and maximum of the salary ranges for the following classifications to address salary compaction within the bargaining group: o 1% for Environmental Programs Coordinator o 2.5% for Senior Information Technology Analyst o 4% for Senior Librarian o 3% for Senior Plans Examiner $50 per month increase to Medical ($1,550 per month) effective January 1, 2026; $50 per month increase to Medical ($1,600 per month) effective the first full pay period of    Page 96 Page 2 3 1 2 0 December 2026. Increase tuition reimbursement to $7,000 per year. Provide a stipend of $500 for employees that complete their My Action Plan and are at the top step of their salary range, and not currently on a Performance Improvement Plan. Provide the option for employees to use Personal Leave to cover holiday closure days. Provide 60 hours of sick leave to new employees at the time of hire. Employees will begin accruing additional sick leave at their seventh month of employment. Boot Allowance – Add the classification of Associate Engineer to the classifications that receive boot allowance. Leave Cash Out – The date of future leave cash outs will be modified to align with other bargaining units. Personnel File – Employees may request that documentation related to a notice of an investigation or a notice of unfounded or unsubstantiated findings from an investigation be removed from the employee’s personnel file. If removed from the personnel file, it should be placed in a separate City investigation/discipline file. Removed investigation related documents will not be considered for promotional or bumping purposes. Salary Survey – During the first six months of the MOU, RCCEA and the City will work cooperatively to agree on an updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, benchmarking. If RCCEA and the City do not reach an agreement by the end of June 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place. Both parties agree to biweekly meetings during that period to work cooperatively on this matter. Removal of “salary code steps” from salary structure language to provide easier integration with Workday. Update and remove old MOU language. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving an 18-month MOU between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. Upon approval of this agreement by the City Council, the MOU would be effective January 1, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: The negotiated 18-month MOU has an estimated cost of $1,718,000. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution with RCCEA Memorandum of Understanding    Page 97 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have agreed upon and presented to this City Council an eighteen-month Memorandum of Understanding effective January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Memorandum of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding (Exhibit A) on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ___________, 2025. ATTACHMENT 1    Page 98 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION REPRESENTING THE SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES BARGAINING UNITS January 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027 Exhibit A    Page 99 2 Table of Contents SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE ............................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2: SALARY SURVEY ............................................................................................ 4 SECTION 3: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT ..................................................................... 4 SECTION 4: SALARY STRUCTURE AND RANGE ADJUSTMENTS .................................... 4 SECTION 5: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MERIT INCREASE ................. 7 SECTION 6: SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL BENEFITS .................................................. 8 SECTION 7: LIFE INSURANCE ............................................................................................. 8 SECTION 8: HEALTH INSURANCE ...................................................................................... 8 SECTION 9: RETIREE MEDICAL .......................................................................................... 9 SECTION 10: RETIREMENT BENEFIT ............................................................................... 10 SECTION 11: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA) ..................... 12 SECTION 12: DEFERRED COMPENSATION .................................................................... 12 SECTION 13: FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 ................ 13 SECTION 14: DENTAL INSURANCE .................................................................................. 13 SECTION 15: OPTICAL INSURANCE ................................................................................ 13 SECTION 16: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE ............................................................................... 13 SECTION 17: PERSONAL LEAVE ...................................................................................... 13 SECTION 18: VACATION ................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 19: VACATION CAP ............................................................................................ 14 SECTION 20: VACATION BUYBACK .................................................................................. 14 SECTION 21: VACATION ACCRUAL .................................................................................. 15 SECTION 22: SICK LEAVE ................................................................................................. 15 SECTION 23: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK AND EARLY RETIREMENT NOTIFICATION INCENTIVE .......................................................................................................................... 16 SECTION 24: HOLIDAYS .................................................................................................... 17 SECTION 25: HOLIDAY TIME ............................................................................................ 17 SECTION 26: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION ....................................................... 18 SECTION 27: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE .................................................................... 18 SECTION 28: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY ........................................ 18 SECTION 29: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY ............................................... 18 SECTION 30: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE ......................................................... 18 SECTION 31: MILITARY LEAVE ......................................................................................... 19 SECTION 32: MILITARY SERVICE BUYBACK ................................................................... 19 SECTION 33: OVERTIME ................................................................................................... 19 SECTION 34: COMPENSATORY TIME............................................................................... 19 SECTION 35: CALL BACK PAY (NON-EXEMPT) ................................................................ 20    Page 100 3 SECTION 36: ON CALL PAY ........................................................................................... 20 SECTION 37: STANDBY PAY ............................................................................................. 20 SECTION 38: BILINGUAL PAY ........................................................................................... 20 SECTION 39: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS ....................................................... 20 SECTION 40: TEAM RC WORK APPAREL ......................................................................... 21 SECTION 41: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND ................. 21 UNIVERSITY COURSES ..................................................................................................... 21 SECTION 42: ENCOURAGING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ................................... 22 SECTION 43: REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS AND RECERTIFICATIONS ......................... 23 SECTION 44: RECOVERY OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS ....................... 23 SECTION 45: DISCIPLINARY APPEAL AND REMOVAL OF DISCIPLINE AND ................. 23 SECTION 46: 4/10 WORK WEEK ........................................................................................ 24 SECTION 47: DIRECT DEPOSIT ........................................................................................ 24 SECTION 48: CARPOOL PROGRAM ................................................................................. 24 SECTION 49: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES ..................................................................... 25 SECTION 50: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS AND CITY EMAIL SYSTEM ........................... 25 SECTION 51: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS ................................................................ 26 SECTION 52: DUES DEDUCTIONS .................................................................................... 26 SECTION 53: NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION – AB119 .................................................. 27 SECTION 54: USE OF CITY RESOURCES ........................................................................ 27 SECTION 55: ASSOCIATION RELEASE TIME ................................................................... 28 SECTION 56: RELEASE TIME FOR ALL HANDS MEETING .............................................. 28 SECTION 57: LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE .......................................................... 29 SECTION 58: PRIORITY OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING .............................. 29 SECTION 59: ADOPTION OF MOU .................................................................................... 29    Page 101 4 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE Unless otherwise stated, the provisions of this MOU are effective January 1, 2026, and shall continue for an eighteen (18) month period, ending June 30, 2027. A.NEGOTIATIONS FOR SUCCESSOR MOU The City and RCCEA agree that negotiations for the successor MOU will begin during the second full week in January 2027, which begins on Monday, January 11, 2027. The City and RCCEA agree to meet and confer at least twice per month while negotiations are ongoing, unless both parties mutually agree to fewer meetings in a month. RCCEA agrees to take Tentative Agreements reached at the table to their membership for a ratification by their members within 60 days or they expire. SECTION 2: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. During the first six months of the MOU, RCCEA and the City will work cooperatively to agree on an updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, benchmarking. If RCCEA and the City do not reach an agreement by the end of June 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place. Both parties agree to biweekly meetings during that period to work cooperatively on this matter. SECTION 3: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, all RCCEA covered employees shall receive a two and one-half percent (2.5%) cost of living adjustment. Effective the first full pay period of June 2027, all RCCEA covered employees shall receive a two percent (2%) cost of living adjustment. SECTION 4: SALARY STRUCTURE AND RANGE ADJUSTMENTS All employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% below the control point and no more than 10% above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent    Page 102 5 appointments, growth within the position. Effective the first full pay period in January 2026, adjustments to the bottom and top of the classification salary ranges will occur as outlined below: 12.89% Account Clerk 5.21% Account Technician 8.10% Accountant 10.60% Accounts Payable Supervisor 12.40% Administrative Assistant 0.90% Animal Behavior Specialist 0.90% Animal Care Attendant 4.42% Animal Care Supervisor 0.90% Animal Caretaker 0.90% Animal Rescue Specialist 0.90% Animal Services Dispatcher 0.90% Animal Services Officer I 0.90% Animal Services Officer II 0.00% Artistic Producer - MTC 6.70% Assistant Engineer 6.70% Assistant Planner 6.70% Associate Engineer 7.70% Associate Planner 0.00% Box Office Coordinator 8.89% Budget Analyst 5.56% Building Inspection Supervisor 11.43% Building Inspector I 11.43% Building Inspector II 12.89% Business License Clerk 11.43% Business License Inspector 0.00% Business License Program Coordinator 10.60% Business License Program Supervisor 5.01% Business License Technician 8.89% City Clerk Records Management Analyst 0.00% Community Affairs Coordinator 8.89% Community Affairs Officer# 5.56% Community Affairs Senior Coordinator 0.00% Community Affairs Specialist 0.00% Community Affairs Technician 5.01% Community Development Technician I 5.01% Community Development Technician II 5.56% Community Improvement Supervisor 9.94% Community Improvement Officer I 9.94% Community Improvement Officer II 0.00% Community Programs Coordinator 0.00% Community Programs Specialist 0.00% Community Services Coordinator 0.00% Community Services Project Coordinator 0.00% Community Services Specialist 5.56% Community Services Supervisor 5.01% Community Services Technician 0.00% Community Theater Producer 12.40% Customer Care Assistant 12.40% Customer Service Representative 5.01% Customer Service Specialist I - Utilities 5.01% Customer Service Specialist II - Utilities 5.01% Customer Service Specialist III - Utilities 13.38% Engineering Aide 13.38% Engineering Technician 6.56% Environmental Programs Coordinator 11.43% Environmental Programs Inspector 0.00% Event & Rental Services Coordinator 0.00% Executive Assistant II 7.57% Executive Assistant 9.51% Fleet Supervisor 0.00% Front of House Coordinator 0.00% Fund Development Coordinator 8.89% GIS Analyst 5.81% GIS Specialist 5.56% GIS Supervisor 13.38% GIS Technician 8.89% Human Resources Business Partner 11.58% Human Resources Clerk    Page 103 6 11.58% Human Resources Technician 3.99% Information Technology Analyst I 3.99% Information Technology Analyst II 5.81% Information Technology Specialist I 5.81% Information Technology Specialist II 5.56% Information Tech Operations Supvr. 5.01% Information Technology Technician 9.94% Lead Park Ranger 0.90% Lead Veterinary Assistant 12.36% Librarian I 8.36% Librarian II 12.36% Library Assistant I 5.56% Library Assistant II 8.94% Library Clerk 5.01% Library Technician 9.51% Maintenance Supervisor 8.89% Management Aide 8.89% Management Analyst I 8.89% Management Analyst II 8.89% Management Analyst III 12.40% Office Services Clerk 5.56% Parking & Business License Supervisor 5.56% Patron & Events Supervisor 10.60% Payroll Supervisor 5.01% Planning Specialist 5.01% Planning Technician 14.23% Plans Examiner I 14.23% Plans Examiner II 8.89% Procurement Business Partner 12.40% Procurement Clerk 5.01% Procurement Technician 5.01% Public Services Technician I 5.01% Public Services Technician II 5.01% Public Services Technician III 11.43% Public Works Inspector I 11.43% Public Works Inspector II 12.40% Records Clerk 0.00% Records Coordinator 8.89% Risk Management Coordinator 8.89% Safety Officer 12.89% Senior Account Clerk 5.21% Senior Account Technician 10.60% Senior Accountant 0.42% Senior Animal Care Supervisor 0.00% Senior Animal Services Officer 11.43% Senior Building Inspector 12.89% Senior Business License Clerk 7.94% Senior Community Improvement Officer 9.51% Senior Electrician 5.01% Sr Environmental Compliance Inspector 8.89% Senior GIS Analyst 8.89% Sr Human Resources Business Partner 6.49% Senior Information Technology Analyst 5.81% Senior Information Technology Specialist 10.36% Senior Librarian 9.94% Senior Parking Enforcement Officer# 7.70% Senior Park Planner 17.23% Senior Plans Examiner 4.01% Senior Procurement Technician 4.01% Senior Public Services Technician 8.89% Senior Risk Management Analyst 0.00% Senior Veterinary Technician 8.89% Special Districts Analyst 11.43% Supervising Public Works Inspector 9.51% Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist 0.00% Theater Production Coordinator 5.56% Theater Production Supervisor 5.01% Theatre Technician III 5.56% Utilities Operation Supervisor 13.38% Utility Marker 0.90% Veterinary Assistant 5.01% Veterinary Technician These changes to the salary ranges do not affect employee pay unless an employee is now paid less than the bottom of the range. In that case, the employee would move up to the    Page 104 7 new bottom of the range. SECTION 5: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MERIT INCREASE The annual performance review shall be replaced with a professional development plan and at least two (2) coaching check-ins per year. The City has formed a committee of all bargaining groups who have agreed to change from an annual performance review to an annual professional development plan, which includes RCCEA. The committee will review the form(s) and processes not defined in this MOU for members and their supervisors to develop the annual professional development plan. Training and sample forms will be provided to employees and supervisors to assist with the professional development plan and coaching check-ins. The City will review the form(s) and process with this committee at least every three (3) years to assure their usefulness for employees and supervisors. RCCEA covered employees on or starting a probationary period will be eligible receive up to five percent (5%) through the term of their probationary period per the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, and would then be eligible for a merit increase in the next professional development plan cycle as long as the probationary period was completed before the end of November (e.g., an employee whose probationary period ends during the months of March through November would be eligible for the February increase; an employee whose probationary period ends during the months of December through February would not be eligible for an additional increase until the February of the following year). In November of each year, employees and their supervisors will work together to develop the employee’s Professional Development Plan. The plan must be completed by the employee and the supervisor by the end of the second week of December each year. Sample Professional Development Plan Timeline: •First and Second week of November – Employee completes “My Action Plan”. •Third and Fourth week of November – Employee and supervisor work together on the Plan, and supervisor reviews the plan with their manager (as determined by the department). •Remainder of November through the second week of December – Supervisor finalizes the employee’s Professional Development Plan taking into account the input of the departmental review. Supervisor goes over the Professional Development Plan with the employee prior to submittal. Upon submission of the completed Professional Development Plan in December (as outlined in the timeline above), employees who are not at top step will receive a merit increase of five percent (5%), but no greater than top step, which will be reflected in the first full pay period the following February. Employees at the top of their salary range will be eligible to receive a non-PERSable stipend of $500, paid in conjunction with the check from the first full pay period in February.    Page 105 8 There shall be no retroactivity for Professional Development Plans where the employee portion is not timely submitted to the supervisor by the end of the second week of November. If, due to unforeseen circumstances, the employee is unable to submit the Professional Development Plan by the end of the second week of November, the City agrees to provide additional time and/or resources as necessary. Employees on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) as of December will not be eligible for a merit increase or a stipend. All Performance Improvement Plans will be reviewed in November. SECTION 6: SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL BENEFITS Employees designated as Supervisory Professional are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: A.Administrative Leave - Fifty (50) hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor. B.Life Insurance -Additional life insurance in the amount of $20,000 (total $50,000 C.Deferred Compensation - Two percent (2%) of base salary. SECTION 7: LIFE INSURANCE The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who elect to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the City's group rate. SECTION 8: HEALTH INSURANCE A.LEVEL OF BENEFIT The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all existing full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining group subject to limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed: $1,550 per month effective the first full pay period in January 2026. $1,600 per month effective the first full pay period in December 2026. . B.USE OF ACCRUED VACATION FOR ABOVE CITY-PAID CONTRIBUTION MAXIMUM HEALTH INSURANCE Employees who elect a health insurance program with a premium above the City- paid contribution maximum may also elect to use the cash value of redeemed accrued vacation to pay for any above maximum premium. Such use will be on a dollar-for dollar and pre-tax basis. Such election must be made in writing, may cover   Page 106 9 all or a specified part over the maximum premium, and be effective for one calendar year unless the participant terminates employment with the City during the year (see Appendix A for complete information on this optional benefit). If accrued vacation is insufficient to pay for any above maximum premium, the difference will be deducted from the employee’s net pay. This periodic payout will not be included in the computation of overtime and will not counts towards Vacation Buyback. The parties agree that this position will not be used when bargaining, contemplating, or calculating the health insurance benefit. C.CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT Effective the first full pay period in January 2023, employees may opt out of medical insurance and receive a $300 per month cash in lieu payment if they meet the eligibility requirements. To be eligible, an employee must provide the following: (1) proof that the employee and all individuals for whom the employee intends to claim a personal exemption deduction for the taxable year or years that begin or end in or with the City’s plan year to which the opt out applies (“tax family”), have or will have minimum essential coverage through another source (other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) for the plan year to which the opt out arrangement applies (“opt out period”); and (2) the employee must sign an attestation that the employee and his/her tax family have or will have such minimum essential coverage for the opt out period. An employee must sign an attestation every plan year during open enrollment or within 30 days after the start of the plan year. The opt-out payment cannot be made, and the City will not in fact make payment if the employer knows that the employee or tax family member does not have such alternative coverage, or if conditions in this paragraph are not otherwise satisfied. D.AFFORDABLE CARE ACT REOPENER The Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association or City may reopen negotiations on the issue of health insurance benefits to address changes to or the elimination of the ACA and in order to avoid penalties or taxes under the ACA or other statutory scheme that may result from an interpretation of the ACA or other statutory scheme by the Internal Revenue Service or other federal agency (including, but not limited to, a revenue ruling, regulation or other guidance) or state agency, or a ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction. These negotiations will not result in a reduction or increase in the amount the City provides for employee health coverage. SECTION 9: RETIREE MEDICAL Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally fund, without any City contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group health insurance available to the City's retirees.    Page 107 10 It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or can be made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if available, will remain available for any specific future period of time. If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s) terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or replacement insurance. All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree. The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to the retiree reimbursing the City not later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage. The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree, regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare. City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance carrier(s). It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates. If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as and for premium reimbursement. SECTION 10: RETIREMENT BENEFIT Unit members who do not meet the definition of “new member” under the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) (those unit members shall be referred to as "classic members") are enrolled in either the CalPERS retirement plan commonly referred to as the 2.5% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 1" and "Tier 2"), or in the 2% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 3") and shall be provided the benefits as described below: A.Tier 1 – Employees Hired Before September 1, 2010 §21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula §21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1.Effective the first full pay period beginning in July of 2022, employees shall pay the full eight percent (8%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution.    Page 108 11 B.Tier 2 – Employees Hired Between September 1, 2010, and July 3, 2011 §21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula §21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor §20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1.Effective the first full pay period beginning in July of 2022, employees shall pay the full eight percent (8%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. C.Tier 3 – Employees Hired on or After July 4, 2011 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation 1.Effective the first full pay period beginning in July of 2022, employees shall pay the full seven percent (7%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. D.It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts A through C above shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of the employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CalPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. All employee payments of the employer share are done pursuant to Government Code Section 20516(f). There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Section 10. E.The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) - As it may from time to time exist, the PEPRA shall in its entirety be given full force and effect. Any provision in this MOU which contradicts any provision of the PEPRA shall be deemed null and void, with the contrary PEPRA provision(s) being given full force and effect. Therefore, no provision of PEPRA shall be deemed to impair any provision of this MOU or any MOU, Agreement, Rule or Regulation predating this MOU. PEPRA includes, but is not limited to, the provisions described below: Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code§ 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member'' is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. Unit members who are "new members" and miscellaneous employees on and after    Page 109 12 January 1, 2013, shall be enrolled in the 2%@ 62 retirement formula (Govt. Code§ 7522.20). Unit members who are "new members" on and after January 1, 2013, shall have "final compensation" measured by the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned by the member during a period of at least 36 consecutive months (Section 7522.32.), and their retirement benefits shall be calculated based on "pensionable compensation" (Section 7522.10) rather than "compensation earnable" (Section 20636). F.In addition, the City has adopted the PARS Retirement Enhancement Plan generally described as .5% (one-half percent) at 55 or at 60, depending upon the employee's hire date, for all miscellaneous employees hired on or prior to December 31, 2012. To be eligible, employees must be at least age 56, have ten (10) years of full-time continuous service and retire from the City. This benefit will be paid to qualified retirees in addition to any CalPERS benefits to which they are entitled. SECTION 11: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA) The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) through the California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist employees with planning for future health care expenses. Employees are allowed a onetime election to opt into the plan. Represented employees shall be eligible to participate in the plan according to a schedule negotiated separately from this agreement. Contributions to the Plan shall be made as City contributions through a salary reduction arrangement. All contributions made on behalf of employees through such salary reduction arrangement are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS provisions. No Employer contributions are to be made to the plan. At the discretion of the applicable bargaining unit, contributions may be amended once per year provided that such amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan Document. SECTION 12: DEFERRED COMPENSATION Effective the first full pay period in July 2020, or as soon as possible thereafter, the City will match dollar for dollar up to $50 per month and 1% of monthly base salary per month in a 401(a) deferred compensation account for any RCCEA covered employee who pays up to $50 and 1% of monthly base salary into a 401(a) deferred compensation account through payroll deductions. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, Deferred Compensation participation for new bargaining unit members shall be automatic with an opt-out provision for new members. The contribution made by the employee through automatic enrollment will be capped at maximum contribution of $50 per month. These provisions are in addition to any other deferred compensation provisions in this MOU.    Page 110 13 SECTION 13: FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 The City has established a flexible spending account plan managed by a third-party administrator that is open to voluntary participation of members in the bargaining unit. The City agrees to pick up all administrative fees associated with maintaining this program for bargaining unit members (including but not limited to debit card fees). SECTION 14: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 15: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit and elected officials. SECTION 16: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE When a death occurs in the family of a full-time employee, the employee shall be granted up to 80 hours of bereavement leave with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, grandparents-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with employee. The City Manager or designee shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner refer to registered domestic partners, as defined by California Family Code Section 297.) Employees are eligible for an additional forty (40) hours of bereavement leave, in addition to the currently provided eighty (80) hours, when the bereavement leave is related to the employee’s spouse or domestic partner, employee’s parents, employee’s children, son-in- law, daughter-in-law, or employee’s siblings, employee’s spouse or domestic partner’s parents, employee’s spouse or domestic partner’s children, or a blood relative residing with the employee. An employee who utilizes bereavement leave shall notify their supervisor of the intent to use such leave. In accordance with AB1949, the bereavement leave must be completed within three (3) months of the date of death but need not be taken consecutively. SECTION 17: PERSONAL LEAVE Employees can use up to 40 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave, or holiday time as personal leave. These 40 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee’s attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. SECTION 18: VACATION The new tier for employees with eighteen (18) or more years of service, begins the first full    Page 111 14 pay period in December 2025. All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule. Length of Service in Years Hours Accrued Per Pay Period Annual Hours Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 9 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15-17 6.923 180 18+7.307 190 SECTION 19: VACATION CAP Any hours accrued over 1040 hours will be cashed out using the options below: Cash Deferred compensation contributions as allowed by law The employees make an irrevocable decision before the end of the calendar year and the payment or distribution will occur in April. SECTION 20: VACATION BUYBACK Annually, any employee that wants to have the City buy back vacation hours shall make an irrevocable election to do so. The irrevocable election shall be submitted in writing to the City’s Human Resources Department on or before December 15 and shall indicate the number of hours of vacation that the employee expects to earn in the following calendar year that the employee wants the City to buy back. Effective December 1, 2025, the buyback maximum will increase as follows: 0-9 Years of Service 170 hours 10-17 Years of Service 180 hours 18+ Years of Service 190 hours This buyback shall occur twice annually, in June (between the last payday in June and the first payday in July) and December (between the first payday in December and the second payday in December), and the employee must indicate the total amount of hours they want paid out in June and in December. Regardless of the number of hours requested to be cashed out at either time, the most the City can cash out is the number of hours accrued and available in that calendar year to date. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buyback time.    Page 112 15 SECTION 21: VACATION ACCRUAL City Manager may provide an accrual rate for new employees up to the equivalent of a ten- year employee upon hire. This is important as many experienced candidates have a significant time in the public sector and might have to begin at a much lower accrual rate than they receive at their current agency. SECTION 22: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. New employees begin employment with 60 hours of sick leave. Sick leave accrual (10 hours/month) begins on the first day of the seventh month of employment. 1.Personal Sick Leave a.Employees can use sick leave for the illness, injury, a health-related reason (such as diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventative care. 2.Family Sick Leave a.Employees can use sick leave for the illness, injury or health-related reason (such as diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventative care of a qualified family member. For the purpose of Family Sick Leave, a qualified member means the employee’s: child (includes any age or dependency status, or for whom the employee is a legal ward or stands in loco parentis), parent (includes person who stood in loco parentis of the employee as a child), parent-in-law, spouse, registered domestic partner, grandparent, grandparent-in-law, grandchild, great grandchild, or sibling. b.Diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition of, or preventative care for a “designated person.” Employee designation of a “designated person” is limited to one “designated person” per 12-month period for paid sick days. 3.Other Statutory Use a.For an employee who is a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other crime in order for the employee to engage in any of the following activities: (1) obtain or attempt to obtain a temporary restraining order or other court assistance to help ensure the health safety or welfare of the employee or their child; or (2) obtain medical attention or psychological counseling, services from a shelter, program or crisis center, or (3) participate in safety planning or other actions to increase safety. Sick leave can be used for the following additional purposes as provided in Government Code Section 12945.8, subsections (a)(3) and (b), as well as all other purposes as allowed by applicable law. 4.Medical Certification    Page 113 16 In the event sick leave absences due to personal illness or injury, which exceeds three (3) consecutive workdays, the Department Head or Human Resources may require a physician’s statement indicating the employee’s fitness to return to work. Should the City suspect that there is an abuse of sick leave by an employee, the City may require that the employee submits to Human Resources a physician’s certification to support the absence. SECTION 23: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK AND EARLY RETIREMENT NOTIFICATION INCENTIVE Effective the first full pay period in July 2022, if employees within the bargaining unit separate their city employment after five (5) years of continuous service, the City will buyback 130 hours of sick leave so long as the employee provides at least two weeks' written notice of their intent to separate. Effective the first full pay period in July 2022, if employees within the bargaining unit provide early notification of their intent to retire from City service, the City will pay the employee for additional accrued sick leave hours in accordance with the schedule below. Notification must be submitted in writing to the Human Resources Department in the form of an irrevocable letter of resignation with intent to retire. •Notification of at least six (6) months (180 calendar days) shall be eligible for seventy- five (75) hours of additional sick leave buyback. •Notification of at least four (4) months (120 calendar days) shall be eligible for fifty (50)hours of additional sick leave buyback. •Notification of at least two (2) months (60 calendar days) shall be eligible for twenty (20) hours of additional sick leave buyback. *Employees must have leave available in order to be eligible for the additional buyback. Use of vacation and/or management leave during the time between the notification and the employee’s retirement date will not be counted toward the required notification periods in the schedule above.    Page 114 17 SECTION 24: HOLIDAYS The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (1)July 4 Independence Day (2)First Monday of September Labor Day (3)November 11 Veteran's Day (4)Fourth Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day (5)Day following Thanksgiving Floater (6)December 24 Day preceding Christmas (7)December 25 Christmas Day (8)January 1 New Year’s Day (9)Third Monday of January Martin Luther King's Birthday (10)Third Monday of February President’s Day (11)Last Monday of May Memorial Day (12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc.) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday, except as provided during a Holiday Closure pursuant to Section 27. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however, Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Year’s, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and June; employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday. SECTION 25: HOLIDAY TIME The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: The ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and    Page 115 18 one-half abrogates the employee's right to that holiday. SECTION 26: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION Maintenance employees in the bargaining unit required as part of the regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Year’s Day, Independence Day, or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten-hour shift or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 27: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE During the term of this MOU, there will be Holiday Facility Closures, certain City facilities may close in conjunction with the Christmas and New Year’s holidays. Closure dates for City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services. The City will strive to provide a schedule of Holiday Facility closures at least six months or more in advance of the closure. During a holiday closure, affected represented employees may take paid leave from holiday, management leave, compensatory time, vacation accruals, personal leave, or use unpaid leave. When holiday closures are implemented by the City, the provisions of Section 24 regarding consecutive holidays shall not apply. SECTION 28: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY The City shall provide employees within the bargaining unit up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child including the paid leave as outlined below; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code Section 12945), if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental, and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 29: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY Employees within the bargaining unit are granted up to 120 hours of natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child, however, use of the 120 paid hours does not extend any time charged under FMLA or CFRA or additional state and federal laws. Any paid time required beyond this initial 120 hours must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 30: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Any employee covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the difference between the disability payments received under Workers Compensation Act and the    Page 116 19 employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one-hour increments. SECTION 31: MILITARY LEAVE Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation, the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 32: MILITARY SERVICE BUYBACK Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 33: OVERTIME For the purposes of overtime calculations only hours worked, vacation leave, holiday leave, and comp time shall be considered hours worked. Use of sick leave does not count towards hours worked for the purposes of determining overtime. Overtime is compensated at 1.5 times the employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) rate of pay. Only hours worked as defined here shall be considered for the purpose of calculating the FLSA pay. A.Maintenance (Non-Teamsters) The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 8 or 10 worked in that shift depending on their regular schedule. Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or an emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 8 or 10 in that 12-hour shift depending on their regular schedule will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. SECTION 34: COMPENSATORY TIME An employee that works overtime may decide to accrue compensatory time off (CTO) at 1.5 times the number of overtime hours worked instead of receiving immediate payment for overtime worked. The maximum CTO that an employee may accrue is 240 hours. Once an employee reaches that accrual cap, all additional overtime worked shall be paid. Employees    Page 117 20 may use CTO as time off, subject to supervisor approval. Supervisor shall not unreasonably withhold approval for use of accrued CTO, and the need to replace the employee using CTO with another employee on overtime shall not be the basis for denying a requested use of CTO. SECTION 35: CALL BACK PAY (NON-EXEMPT) If an employee is required to be called back to work after completing his or her normal shift or after having left City premises or the employee’s work location, the employee shall be compensated at the rate for each hour worked on call back with a minimum of two (2) hours call back compensation at the appropriate rate, regardless of whether the employee actually works less than two (2) hours. The time starts when the call back call is received by the employee. Employees must arrive at the worksite and perform the work required in order to receive callback pay. When an employee is called on his/her day off or after hours for work purposes, the employee shall be compensated at the appropriate rate of pay or in comp time if applicable for the actual time worked, rounded to the nearest quarter hour (.25). SECTION 36: ON CALL PAY Employees required to be on call shall be compensated at the rate of $200.00 per week. SECTION 37: STANDBY PAY Public Works Supervisors who are required to be in an on-call rotation will receive a standby payment of $100 per week, for the week that they are required to be on call. SECTION 38: BILINGUAL PAY Bargaining Unit employees who qualify for bilingual pay will be provided such at $75.00 per month, Each Department Head will determine the number of employees needed to perform translation duties per department, subject to review and approval of the Deputy City Manager/ Administrative Services. Employees who receive bilingual pay are expected to perform translation services for their Department and for other City Services should the need arise. An updated list of the employees receiving bilingual pay will be provided every six-months or as changes occur. Bilingual duties will be distributed as equitable as possible. SECTION 39: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS A.Safety Footwear The City will provide up to $350.00 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The current classification of employees who may be required to wear safety footwear are Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Officer I & II, Assistant Engineer, Associate Engineer, Building Inspector, Building Inspector Supervisor, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Community Improvement Supervisor, Environmental Programs    Page 118 21 Coordinator, Environmental Programs Inspector, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works Inspector, Public Works Inspector I, Public Works Inspector II, Safety Officer, Senior Animal Services Officer, Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, and Supervising Public Works Inspector. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, this allowance would permit the use of the allowance for the purchase of both shoes and accessories. B.Uniforms The City may provide uniforms (including shirts) and/or maintenance of uniforms for the following positions: Animal Care Attendant, Animal Caretaker, Animal Care Supervisor, Animal Handler, Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Dispatcher, Animal Services Officer I & II, Building Inspector, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Administrative Assistant (Animal Care & Services), Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, Theatre Production Supervisor, and Theatre Technician III. The City will provide 4-5 shirts per year for positions required to wear City shirts: Community Improvement Officers (Senior I &II), Business License Technicians, Building Inspectors (I & II) and Technicians, Public Works Inspectors (I & II). The City reports CalPERS on an annual basis the actual value of compensation paid or the monetary value for the purchase, rental and/or maintenance of required clothing for RCCEA covered CalPERS’ Classic Members. The parties analyzed the value and determined it shall not exceed $580.00 per fiscal year. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571 (a)(5) Statutory Items. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. SECTION 40: TEAM RC WORK APPAREL The City will provide bargaining unit members with one Team RC shirt per fiscal year at a cost not to exceed $50. SECTION 41: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COURSES Reimbursements by the City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed three thousand three hundred dollars ($3,300.00) during any fiscal year. Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $7,000 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all the following conditions precedent exists: A.Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or    Page 119 22 university that is licensed/accredited by one of the six regional accreditors involved in higher education accreditation in the United States. B.The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of "C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C" or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received). C.Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1) those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major. D.Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s) for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regards shall be final. E.The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought. SECTION 42: ENCOURAGING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Promotions are movements to a different classification with a higher pay range. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to seek regular performance feedback from their direct supervisors and other Department leadership for professional development and in order to prepare to compete for future promotional opportunities. If a member applies for a promotion to a bargaining unit position and is not selected for an interview or has an interview but is not selected for the job, the employee is encouraged to request feedback from their supervisor as to reasons why they were not selected. The supervisor will work other Department personnel and/or Human Resources to provide a response to the requesting employee within 30 days of the request.    Page 120 23 Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to register on the City’s employment portal to be informed of promotional opportunities by email, and to check their City email account regularly for information regarding promotional opportunities. SECTION 43: REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS AND RECERTIFICATIONS The City will pay for the cost of any required certifications or recertification required of employees to maintain their positions. Required certifications must be outlined in an employee’s classification specification. The Department Director, with the approval of the City Manager, can add to but not eliminate certifications and recertifications that Departments will cover the costs for employees to maintain. Any additions by the Department Head must be applied equally to all employees in that classification. SECTION 44: RECOVERY OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS With the goal of providing additional development opportunities to employees, the City may pay for the cost of training and certificate programs that are not specifically required to maintain the employee’s position, up to a maximum of $10,000. Employees may request that the City pay the cost of such trainings and certifications. The Department Director and/or Deputy City Manager with the approval of the City Manager, may approve these requests, subject to budget availability. If an employee requests participation in a training or certificate program with a registration cost of $2,000 or more, the employee will be required to repay the cost of said training or certificate program if they leave City employment within four (4) years of the registration for that program. One-quarter of the amount owed shall be forgiven each fiscal year. Employees participating in this program must sign an agreement indicating that any outstanding amount can be deducted from their final paycheck upon separation. Any outstanding amount is due at separation. This benefit does not pertain to professional conferences related to an employee’s ongoing, continuous learning, which are routinely including within the department’s budget. SECTION 45: DISCIPLINARY APPEAL AND REMOVAL OF DISCIPLINE AND INVESTIGATION NOTICES Effective the first full pay period following City Council adoption, a disciplinary suspension of three (3) days or more without pay will be subject to a Skelly meeting before the City Manager or designee. Such disciplinary suspension will not be subject to removal from the employee’s personnel file. A disciplinary suspension of two (2) days or less without pay will not be subject to pre-disciplinary appeal. However, the employee may elect to write a written response which must be received by the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services within eight (8) working days from the date the notice is sent or delivered to the employee, to be placed in the employee’s personnel file along with the disciplinary suspension notice.    Page 121 24 For a documentation of an oral reprimand, a written reprimand, or a disciplinary suspension of two (2) days or less, after five (5) years have passed in which the employee has not been subject to further discipline, the employee may request, and the Human Resources Director may approve, removal of the disciplinary record from the employee’s personnel file. Human Resources Director approval is discretionary. Examples of when the request to remove discipline may be denied include, but are not limited to, (1) if the discipline is based on an act of violence, (2) repeated behavior, or (3) if there is an active investigation pending that may result in further discipline. If the disciplinary documentation is removed from the personnel file, it shall be placed in a separate City discipline file. Removed discipline will not be considered for promotional or bumping purposes. The City may rely on disciplinary records that have been removed to the City discipline file when considering future discipline. If subsequent discipline is issued, the removed disciplinary documentation will be returned to the employee’s personnel file. Employees may request that documentation related to a notice of an investigation or a notice of an unfounded or an unsubstantiated finding(s) from an investigation be removed from the employee’s personnel file. If removed from the personnel file, it shall be placed in a separate City investigation/discipline file. Removed investigations related documents will not be considered for promotional or bumping purposes. SECTION 46: 4/10 WORK WEEK City Hall generally operates on a 4/10 work week, hours 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. However, different work schedules consisting of various work hours and days may be adopted by individual departments based on departmental need. Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times. SECTION 47: DIRECT DEPOSIT All new bargaining unit members are required to enroll in direct deposit. Vacation buy back and comp time payouts can be by paper check. SECTION 48: CARPOOL PROGRAM The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full-time regular employees. Participation is voluntary, and employees interested in participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is $2.60 per day for every day that the bargaining unit employee carpools.    Page 122 25 SECTION 49: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES The City will provide RCCEA with a list of specific Confidential Employees whose positions are covered by the Supervisory/Professional or General Employees' bargaining units. These employees are designated as Confidential Employees due to the work they perform related to employer-employee relations and the access they have to information related to employer-employee relations. The City will update that list when a new confidential employee is hired, or the duties of a current confidential employee changes and they are no longer involved in employer employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City, may not represent employees in discipline or grievance procedures and may not provide information or participate in labor negotiation on behalf of RCCEA. Confidential Employees may be employed in some of the following positions (this list is not exhaustive): SECTION 50: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS AND CITY EMAIL SYSTEM The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist, for RCCEA notices. Such space will be no less than 18" x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a Bargaining Unit work or break area, the RCCEA may, after receiving approval in writing from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. RCCEA may also distribute notices to covered employees through the City's email system. Bulletin boards and emails shall only be used for the following notices: •Scheduled RCCEA meetings, agenda and minutes. •Information on RCCEA elections and the results. •Information regarding RCCEA social, recreational, and related news bulletins. •Reports of official business of RCCEA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors. City equipment (including City computers, laptops, and tablets), materials, or supplies shall not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, Account Technician Management Analyst Series Administrative Assistant Payroll Supervisor Administrative Technician Risk Analyst Budget Analyst Risk Management Coordinator Executive Assistant I Senior Account Technician Executive Assistant II Senior Accountant Human Resources Technician Human Resources Business Partner Senior Risk Management Analyst    Page 123 26 defamatory, or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an authorized representative of RCCEA. RCCEA agrees to follow the City's E-Mail Policy when sending emails to City employees. RCCEA understands that all electronic mail is not confidential, and that the city reserves the right to access and disclose all messages sent over its email system for any purpose in accordance with the City's E-Mail Policy. SECTION 51: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Officers and representatives of RCCEA to confer with Bargaining Unit employees during working hours. Therefore, RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives, Officers or representatives will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations. The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with RCCEA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. SECTION 52: DUES DEDUCTIONS RCCEA membership dues shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of RCCEA employee per the direction of RCCEA. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to an RCCEA account, provided to the City by RCCEA, on a regular basis consistent with the City’s regular pay periods. RCCEA dues shall be deducted in an amount per bi- weekly pay period authorized by the RCCEA Board of Directors. A. Separation from Unit The provisions of this Agreement shall not apply during periods that an employee is in out of paid status for more than thirty (30) days. If an employee is paid for a prior out of paid status his/her representational dues shall be deducted and paid to the Association. B. Forfeiture of Deductions If the balance of the employee’s wages, after all other involuntary and insurance premium deductions are made in any one pay period, is not sufficient to pay deductions    Page 124 27 required by this Agreement, no such deduction shall be made for that period. C. Maintenance of Membership Clause Any employee in this unit who has authorized Association dues deductions on the effective date of this memorandum of understanding or at any time subsequent to the effective date of his memorandum of understanding shall continue to have such deductions made by the City until such time that the Association notifies the City to stop collecting dues; provided however, that any employee in the unit may terminate such association dues during the month of November by notifying any association official in writing of his/her termination of Association from which dues deductions are to be canceled. Such notification shall be delivered in person or by U.S mail and should be in the form of a letter containing the following information: employee name, employee number, job classification, department name and name of the Association (Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association – RCCEA). The association will provide the City’s Human Resources Department with the appropriate documentation to process these dues cancellations within ten (10) business days after the close of the withdrawal period. RCCEA shall hold the City harmless for any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements, or other forms of liability that may arise out of or by reason of action taken by the City under this article. The Association shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless against any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements or other forms of liability that shall arise out of or by reason of, action taken or not taken by the City under this section of the MOU. This includes not only City’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs but the reasonable cost of management preparation time as well. The City shall notify the Association of such costs on a case-by- case basis. SECTION 53: NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION – AB119 The City shall provide thirty (30) minutes at a mutually agreeable time during the employee onboarding process for a RCCEA representative to meet with a new RCCEA covered employee and present benefits of being a member of the union. Onboarding of new employees occurs during the first working day at the start of a new pay period up to twenty- six (26) times per year. The City will provide a calendar before the start of a new year. The City will provide RCCEA with at least ten (10) days-notice, or as soon as practical, of onboarding of new RCCEA covered employees. A RCCEA representative will have up to thirty (30) minutes of uninterrupted time to meet with new RCCEA covered employees. Prior to meeting, or in no case later than the meeting time, the City will provide the name and job assignment of the new employee to the RCCEA representative. The City will provide designated RCCEA representatives with all available information about the employee as required under AB119 within thirty (30) days of the employees start date and the City will provide information on all RCCEA covered employees again as required by AB119 at least three (3) times per year. SECTION 54: USE OF CITY RESOURCES RCCEA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public    Page 125 28 for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the public, provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. RCCEA may also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for RCCEA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by RCCEA from the appropriate management representative. RCCEA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by RCCEA. SECTION 55: ASSOCIATION RELEASE TIME When RCCEA is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City business hours, a reasonable number of Officers or other representatives of the RCCEA shall be allowed reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits. 1. Such Officers and representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2. Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with operating needs and work schedules. RCCEA Officers or representatives shall be permitted, if requested by an RCCEA represented employee, to attend an employee counseling session, which could result in disciplinary action. Such officers or representatives shall also be permitted, if requested by the Association employee, to be present at an employee disciplinary session. 1. Such Officers or representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2. No more than one employee at a time shall be granted release time to represent one employee. RCCEA Officers or representatives of the Association shall be given reasonable time during work hours to investigate, and process specified grievances or complaints arising out of the application of MOU or personnel rules, upon prior permission from their respective department head or division manager. During the term of the next MOU, RCCEA Officers and representatives agree to track their Association release time via the payroll system. The City and RCCEA agree to review this usage to determine if limits need to be incorporated into a subsequent MOU. SECTION 56: RELEASE TIME FOR ALL HANDS MEETING RCCEA shall be allowed four (4) ninety (90) minute periods of release time for all hands meetings per fiscal year, including travel time, during work hours. For the purposes of labor negotiations with the City additional meetings may be requested and may be granted by the Human Resources Director.    Page 126 29 SECTION 57: LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The City and RCCEA agree to implement quarterly labor/management committee (LMC) meetings to discuss employee relations issues. The LMC will not be authorized to change the MOU or to settle any grievance SECTION 58: PRIORITY OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association shall take precedent over the Personnel Rules adopted per Resolution 13-065. SECTION 59: ADOPTION OF MOU This memorandum, between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) representing the Supervisory Professional and General Employee bargaining units, was adopted on November 5, 2025.    Page 127 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association: Date_______________ Date _______________ _________________________ ____________________________ John R. Gillison Mary LaPlante City Manager Managing Labor Representative _________________________ _____________________________ Peter Castro Bond Mendez Deputy City Manager RCCEA President    Page 128 DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst III SUBJECT:Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of San Bernardino and Participating Cities for the West End Regional Navigation Center, and Consideration of an Allocation in the Amount of $400,000 from Eligible Funding Sources for the Regional Navigation Center, including $300,000 for the City's Annual Contribution and $100,000 for Transportation Services. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the County of San Bernardino and participating cities for the West End Regional Navigation Center; 2. Authorize the allocation of $400,000 for the City’s participation in the West End Regional Navigation Center, including $300,000 for the City’s annual commitment and $100,000 for transportation services; 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to fund these costs utilizing any combination of eligible funding sources, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA), Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP), other state and federal homelessness programs, and National Opioid Settlement Funds. To the extent that such funds are unavailable or insufficient, the remaining balance will be funded from the General Fund using funds appropriated in the approved FY 2025/26 Budget; and 4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the MOU and take all necessary actions to effectuate the City’s participation in the West End Regional Navigation Center. BACKGROUND: Homelessness continues to present complex and growing challenges across California and the Inland Empire, including within Rancho Cucamonga. While the City remains recognized for its high quality of life, safe neighborhoods, and proactive planning, rising housing instability and visible homelessness highlight the need for coordinated, compassionate, and regional solutions. The 2025 San Bernardino County Point-in-Time Count recorded 3,837 individuals experiencing homelessness countywide, including 2,636 unsheltered individuals living in vehicles, encampments, or other places not meant for habitation. The West Valley cities account for over    Page 129 Page 2 3 1 2 9 550 unsheltered individuals, underscoring the urgent need for a regional response that no single jurisdiction can address alone. Although Rancho Cucamonga’s numbers remain lower than many neighboring jurisdictions, the upward trend—driven by regional factors such as housing affordability, economic challenges, behavioral health system gaps, and discharges from institutional settings without stable housing— emphasizes the importance of sustained collaboration. The City’s outreach and public safety teams routinely encounter individuals experiencing homelessness who lack immediate access to safe shelter, behavioral health care, or recovery supports. Existing emergency housing resources within the region remain limited and are often at capacity, resulting in barriers to stabilization and recovery. To address these regional challenges, the County of San Bernardino and participating West Valley cities - including Chino, Chino Hills, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland - are collaborating to develop the West End Navigation Center (“Center”). The Center, located at 10785 Laurel Street in Fontana, will expand the region’s capacity to provide temporary shelter and supportive services, serving as a key resource to help individuals transition from crisis to stability. ANALYSIS: The West End Navigation Center represents a regional, housing-focused solution designed to strengthen the coordinated response to homelessness across the West Valley. It is designed as a low-barrier, housing-focused service hub that will provide stability, connection to services, and direct pathways to permanent housing. The West End Navigation Center goes beyond traditional emergency shelters by integrating case management, behavioral health care, medical oversight, coordinated social services, housing navigation, and workforce development within a single, coordinated facility. The Center will operate with a trauma-informed and person-centered approach, delivering comprehensive services that address the complex needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness. The Center will provide 200 beds and operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days per year as a referral-only, managed-access facility serving participating jurisdictions in the West Valley. The Center will provide three integrated components: Emergency Shelter Services: Low-barrier accommodations with meals, hygiene and laundry facilities, intensive case management, behavioral health services, housing navigation, transportation assistance, and benefits enrollment. Recuperative Care Services: Temporary residential accommodations, medical oversight, and case management for individuals discharged from hospitals who require continued medical recovery but lack stable housing. Sobering Center Services: A monitored space for individuals under the influence of alcohol or other substances who do not require hospitalization, providing medical monitoring, crisis intervention, and referrals to substance use treatment. The Center will be staffed by multidisciplinary teams that include case managers, behavioral health professionals, and County service providers. Clients will be referred through approved channels such as participating jurisdictions, law enforcement, hospitals, and outreach teams— ensuring a coordinated and secure intake process.    Page 130 Page 3 3 1 2 9 Operational Overview Total of 200 beds – 100 emergency shelter beds, 100 recuperative medical care beds, plus a sobering center 24/7 operations – Round-the-clock staffing, case management, and security; residents remain in place with an emphasis on stability and continuity. Referral-only admissions – No walk-ins/walk-offs; all entries and exits coordinated for safety and care continuity One-stop service model – On-site services include Behavioral Health, Substance Use Services, Public Health, Transitional Assistance, Workforce Development, and the Office of Homeless Services (OHS) for housing navigation and Continuum of Care coordination. Low-barrier design – Guests may bring pets, partners, and personal belongings, reducing barriers to entry. Comprehensive supports – Meals, case management, benefits enrollment, transportation, and employment services provided on-site. Transportation coordination will also play a key role in connecting individuals to the Center. The West Valley Detention Center is located in Rancho Cucamonga, and individuals from multiple jurisdictions are released there daily, some without stable housing. The City will work with the County and local partners to establish safe and consistent transportation between the detention facility and the Center. This approach ensures that individuals exiting custody have immediate access to shelter, services, and stabilization supports rather than returning to unsheltered homelessness. The project is currently in the design phase, with construction anticipated to take approximately 9 to 12 months and an expected opening in summer 2026. Once complete, the Center will serve as a vital extension of Rancho Cucamonga’s local homelessness response—providing outreach and public safety teams with a structured, regional facility where individuals can stabilize, access care, and transition toward permanent housing. This resource will help fill a critical gap for individuals who might otherwise cycle between encampments, emergency rooms, or the criminal justice system without access to long-term solutions. Financial Structure The development and operation of the West End Navigation Center are supported through a shared regional investment model designed to ensure long-term sustainability and equitable cost distribution among participating partners. The County of San Bernardino has committed a $20 million capital investment to acquire the fully improved building from the City of Fontana, along with an additional $5 million Capitalized Operating Subsidy Reserve (COSR) to stabilize operations. Annual operating costs are projected at approximately $3 million, shared between the County and participating cities. Each city’s contribution is based on a tiered, pro rata cost-sharing structure that reflects population size, the estimated number of unhoused individuals within its jurisdiction, and access to existing local shelter resources. This approach ensures that costs and available beds are allocated equitably in proportion to each city’s level of investment and service needs. Emergency bed allocations are tied to funding levels, with a $200,000 contribution corresponding to five beds, a $250,000 contribution corresponding to seven beds, and contributions of $300,000 or more corresponding to ten beds. Contribution levels will be evaluated every two years and adjusted as    Page 131 Page 4 3 1 2 9 needed based on population changes and available grant funding, to maintain fairness and fiscal sustainability. Based on the County’s tiered cost-sharing structure, Rancho Cucamonga’s annual contribution is $300,000, which secures ten dedicated beds for City residents and provides access to comprehensive wraparound services. This funding level reflects the City’s relative population size as one of the largest cities in the West End, as well as its local resource capacity within the broader regional system. While other West End cities operate dedicated emergency or navigation- level shelters in their communities, Rancho Cucamonga currently does not, making this investment a practical approach to ensure reliable local access to beds and integrated services for our residents - resources that would otherwise require significant local investment to develop and sustain independently. Participation in this regional initiative represents a strategic investment that enhances service capacity, strengthens interagency coordination, and improves outcomes for Rancho Cucamonga residents experiencing or at risk of homelessness. FISCAL IMPACT: Rancho Cucamonga’s participation in the West End Navigation Center will require an annual operating contribution of $300,000, as established in the Memorandum of Understanding. Staff recommends an additional allocation of $100,000 to support transportation services between the West Valley Detention Center and the West End Navigation Center, ensuring individuals released from custody have direct access to shelter and supportive services. Council authorization would allow staff to fund these costs utilizing any combination of eligible funding sources, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA), Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP), other state and federal homelessness programs, and National Opioid Settlement Funds. To the extent that such funds are unavailable or insufficient, the remaining balance will be funded from the General Fund using funds appropriated in the approved FY 2025/26 Budget. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This initiative helps realize the City Council’s core values of “Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all” and “Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all” by supporting the well-being and stability of the community’s most vulnerable residents. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) - West End Navigation Center    Page 132 PAGE 1 OF 26 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between THE CITIES OF CHINO, CHINO HILLS, FONTANA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RIALTO, and UPLAND and SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY for the OPERATION OF A REGIONAL NAVIGATION CENTER This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into as of December 16, 2025 (“Effective Date”) by and between the Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland, each of which is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (referred to individually as “City Party” and collectively as “the City Parties”), and San Bernardino County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”). The City Parties and the County may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “the Parties .” Recitals WHEREAS, the Parties, like many regions throughout California, have experienced significant growth in their unhoused population in recent years, presenting complex challenges driven by untreated substance use and mental health disorders, rising housing costs, and insufficient emergency, transitional, and affordable housing resources; and WHEREAS, this growth in the unhoused population has resulted in increased incidents of camping and loitering on public rights-of-way, parks, and other public property within the Parties' jurisdictions, creating public health and safety concerns while straining municipal resources; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to cooperate to address homelessness through collaborative, evidence- based approaches that prioritize both public safety and the dignified treatment of unhoused individuals; and WHEREAS, the Parties seek to implement comprehensive solutions to balance enforcement with meaningful support services; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that addressing homelessness effectively requires collaborative regional efforts and hereby commit to establishing an emergency housing facility that offers integrated support services—including case management, behavioral health care, medical oversight, coordinated social services, transportation support, and housing placement assistance—designed to help residents successfully transition to permanent, stable housing; and WHEREAS, the Parties further commit to establishing clear pathways from emergency housing to permanent housing solutions by providing coordinated access to transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and affordable housing opportunities within their respect ive jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the need for professional expertise in delivering trauma -informed, comprehensive services that address the complex needs of unhoused individuals and families; and ATTACHMENT 1   Page 133 PAGE 2 OF 26 WHEREAS, this collaborative approach represents the Parties' commitment to addressing homelessness through shared resources, coordinated planning, and evidence -based practices that serve both unhoused individuals and the broader community; and WHEREAS, the Parties' respective governing bodies have reviewed and approved this MOU, finding that this regional partnership advances the health, safety, and welfare of all residents within their jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to cooperate in good faith to operate a new regional emergency housing and services center; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to define the responsibilities of each Party with respect to the funding and operation of a new Regional Navigation Center.    Page 134 PAGE 3 OF 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. RECITALS ............................................................................... 4 II. PURPOSE ............................................................................... 4 III. TERM ...................................................................................... 4 IV. TERMINATION ....................................................................... 4 V. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................... 5 VI. SCOPE OF SERVICES .........................................................10 VII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY PARTIES ......................12 VIII. PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICE ............. 14 IX. MISCELLANEOUS ................................................................15    Page 135 PAGE 4 OF 26 I. RECITALS The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and made a substantive part of this MOU by this reference. II. PURPOSE A. The Parties desire to work together cooperatively and in good faith towards funding and operating a Regional Navigation Center (“Facility”). The Facility will operate as a referral- only facility with managed access protocols designed to ensure safety and security for all participants. The Facility will serve individuals who meet established eligibility criteria for each program component, providing comprehensive in-house services, case management, medical oversight, and coordinated service delivery within a n environment optimized for successful outcomes. B. This MOU is intended to define the rights and responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the establishment, funding, and operation of the Facility for homeless individuals as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the State of California, including individual adults (persons 18 -years of age or older), individual adults (parent or guardian) with children, and families (married or unmarried adult partners with children) experiencing homelessness within the referring Par ty's respective jurisdiction, as further described herein. III. TERM A. Initial Term, Extension. This MOU shall be effective as of the Effective Date and shall remain in force and effect for ten (10) years unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement of the Parties pursuant to Section IV of this MOU. Thereafter, this MOU shall automatically renew for one additional five (5) year term unless any Party provides written notice of non-renewal to all other Parties at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the initial term, or the Parties may mutually agree in writing to a renewal term of two (2), three (3), or four (4) years instead. B. Renewal. After the initial term and first extension, as provided for in Section III.A of this MOU, lapse, the terms of this MOU may be renegotiated between the Parties, for a successor MOU, or the Parties may agree, upon written approval of their respective governing Boards or Councils, to extend this Agreement for consecutive one-year terms. IV. TERMINATION A. Mutual Termination. Notwithstanding the term set forth in Section III.A of this MOU, this MOU may be terminated at any time upon the written agreement of at least six (6) City Parties and the County to this MOU. Such termination shall be evidenced by a written instrument executed by the authorized representatives of at least six (6) participating city jurisdictions and the County, and shall specify the effective date of termination . B. Individual Party Withdrawal. Beginning in the ninth (9th) year after the Effective Date of this MOU, any City Party may withdraw from this MOU by providing twelve (12) months advance written notice to all other Parties. The withdrawing Party must continue all obligations, including timely payment of costs and any applicable termination fees,    Page 136 PAGE 5 OF 26 through the effective date of withdrawal. Notwithstanding the above, beginning in the third (3rd) year after the Effective Date of this MOU, the City of Ontario may withdraw from this MOU by providing three (3) months advance written notice to all other Parties. C. Termination Fee Prior to End of Ten-Year Term. The termination fee payable by any City Party terminating its participation pursuant to Section IV.B of this MOU shall be equal to the unpaid portion of the ten (10) year commitment as calculated from the effective date of termination through the end of the Term. The termination fee shall be paid by the terminating City Party to the County not later than six (6) months before the effective date of termination, unless another agreeable date is reached and agreed to by the County. Failure to timely remit the termination fee shall render a City Party's notice of termination ineffective. Notwithstanding the above, the City of Ontario shall not be subject to the termination fee regardless of whether Ontario terminates the agreement upon three (3) years of Facility operations or later. V. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES A. Facility. The County shall be responsible for the acquisition and operation of the Facility, to be located at 11109 Jasmine Street, Fontana, California 92337 . B. Host City. The City of Fontana agrees to serve as the host city for the Facility and to allow the Facility to be located and operated within its jurisdiction for the purposes set forth in this MOU for such term as the MOU remains in force and effect. As host city, th e City of Fontana shall provide or facilitate necessary municipal services, permits, zoning approvals, and regulatory compliance required for the Facility's operation, notwithstanding any possible termination of the City of Fontana's participation in the MOU pursuant to Section IV of this MOU. The County agrees to coordinate with the City of Fontana in its role as host city and to support Fontana in fulfilling its host city responsibilities. C. Establishment of Facility. The County agrees to be responsible for the acquisition of the Facility, property start-up costs, and its identified portion of operational costs as set forth in Section VII of this MOU. The County shall pay all costs and expenses associated with the operation and maintenance of the Facility and the provision of services at the Facility, except for the amounts set forth in Section VII of this MOU for which the City Parties shall be responsible. Annual operating costs that exceed the agreed -upon threshold established in Section VII shall be subject to negotiation among all Parties prior to the County's obligation to pay such excess costs. D. Vendor of Choice. The operation and management of the Facility and the provision of the services at the Facility, as described in Section VI of this MOU, shall be performed by a vendor selected by the County through a County-directed procurement process. 1. Operations Agreement. The County and Facility Operator, and other vendors and sub-vendors as determined necessary and appropriate by the County, shall enter into agreement for operation and management of the Facility, such duties to encompass, among other things, the matters described in Section VI of this MOU. 2. Vendor Oversight. The County shall, at all times, have the duty and responsibility to oversee the conduct and performance of any vendor and sub -vendors, and take appropriate measures to ensure vendors are, at all times, in compliance with the    Page 137 PAGE 6 OF 26 provisions of this MOU and any operations agreements between the County and such vendors. E. Mission Oversight. The County shall oversee the successful achievement of the Facility’s mission to serve the unhoused population and a chieve a short- and long-term reduction in the unhoused population within the jurisdictions of the Parties. F. Service Outcomes. The County shall oversee service outcomes related to the sheltering, care, and treatment of Facility clients. G. County Insurance. The County shall obtain and maintain appropriate policies of insurance or self-insured retention in accordance with the minimum requirements for the types and amounts of coverage established by the County’s risk management standards, or as otherwise established in policies established by the County for operation of the Facility. H. Indemnification and Insurance Requirements 1. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, County shall indemnify and hold harmless City Parties, and each of them (individually, a “City Party”), together with their officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs, caused in whole or in part by the negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of County, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, subconsultants, vendors, or sub-vendors (including the officers, employees, agents, contractors and volunteers of any vendor or sub-vendor performing work or services at, or in connection with, the Facility or its operation) in the performance of services under this MOU or the performance of any work or service at or in connection with the Facility or its operation. County’s duty to indemnify and hold harmless a City Party shall not extend to that City Party’s sole or active negligence. In the event a City Party is made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from the performance of the services contemplated by this MOU, or the performance of work or services at or in connection with the Facility by any ind ividual or entity, and upon demand by the City Party, County shall defend the City Party at County’s cost to the extent the matters arise from, relate to or are caused by County’s negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with the performance of se rvices under this MOU or the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of any County officer, official, employee, consultant, subconsultant, vendor, or sub-vendor (including the officers, employees, agents, contractors and volunteers of any vendor or sub -vendor) in the performance of any work or service at or in connection with the Facility or its operation. In the event of any dispute between County and a City Party, as to whether liability arises from the sole or active negligence of the City Party or its officers, employees, or agents, County will be obligated to pay for City Party’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the City Party as solely or actively negligent. County will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. 2. Insurance. County and City Parties are authorized self-insured or partially self-insured public entities for purposes of Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Worker's Compensation and warrant that through their respective programs of self- insurance and insurance, they have adequate coverage or resources to protect against    Page 138 PAGE 7 OF 26 liabilities arising out of performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this Agreement. I. Licenses. The County shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining, at all times while this MOU is operational and in effect, all business licenses, professional licenses or certifications, and permits, if any, determined by the County to be necessary for operating and providing services at the Facility pursuant to this MOU. 1. Vendor Licenses. The County shall ensure that each party providing services or otherwise engaged in the delivery of services to the Facility , including but not limited to the Facility Operator, shall obtain and maintain, at all times, all business licenses, professional licenses or certifications, and permits, if any, determined by the County to be necessary for operating and providing services at the Facility pursuant to this MOU. J. Records. The County shall be responsible for maintaining complete and accurate records with respect to all services and programs performed at the Facility and all costs and expenses incurred pursuant to this MOU. Such records shall be retained during the term of this MOU and for five (5) years after the termination of the MOU. The County shall also be responsible for establishing and maintaining on a current basis an adequate accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The County shall further be responsible during the term of this MOU for the preparation of an annual report to the City Parties, in a format approved by the City Parties, with respect to all services and programs performed at the Facility and all costs and expenses incurred pursuant to this MOU. 1. Vendor Records. The County shall ensure that all vendors under contract to provide services to the Facility maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all services and programs performed at the Facility, including records related to all costs and expenses incurred pursuant to their operational agreement with the County. To that end, County must ensure that each of its vendor operating agreements requires the vendor to: a) Retain all records during the term of their respective operational agreement and, in the event of termination of the operational agreement, provide and turn over all records maintained by the vendor in relation to services provided under the operational agreement to the County. In the event of dispute related to providing and turning over records to the County, the vendor shall retain such records indefinitely until such matters of dispute are resolved either through mutual agreement, dispute resolution, mediation, or by order of a court of competent jurisdiction. b) Be responsible for establishing and maintaining on a current basis an adequate accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. c) Be responsible during the term of their operational agreement, for the preparation of annual reports required by the County, in a format approved by the County, with respect to all services and programs performed at the Facility and all costs and expenses incurred pursuant to th eir respective operational agreement. 2. Data-Sharing. The County shall provide the City Parties with Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) project-level data on a quarterly basis. The data submission shall include, at a minimum, information on client demographics; services provided; bed utilization records by jurisdiction; project    Page 139 PAGE 8 OF 26 enrollments and exits; recidivism rates within six (6) to twelve (12) months; housing outcomes and cost incurred per outcome. Data shall be submitted in a format approved by the City Parties and within fifteen (15) days following the end of each quarter. The City Parties reserve the right to request additional HMIS data or performance reports as necessary to evaluate program outcomes and compliance with funding requirements. K. Financial Audit. The County shall annually conduct a financial audit of Facility Operator’s financial records related to the performance of this MOU. 1. Frequency of Audit. Such audits may be conducted by the County or its authorized representatives at reasonable times during normal business hours upon providing reasonable written notice to vendors. Additional audits may be conducted upon reasonable request by the Parties or in response to security incidents. 2. Scope and Methodology. The purpose of such audits is to ensure compliance with the terms of this MOU and to verify the accuracy of vendors’ performance. The audit shall be conducted in accordance with industry best practices and any relevant standards specified in this MOU. 3. Access and Documentation. Vendors shall provide the County or its authorized representatives with access to all relevant records, documents and facilities necessary to conduct each annual audit. Documents to be audited shall include, but not be limited to invoices, contracts, quality control records, and any other documentation pertinent to the audit scope. 4. Reporting and Remediation. Following completion of each annual audit, the County shall report to the Oversight Committee regarding the performance of the vendor, including any identified discrepancies, non -compliance issues, or areas for improvement. 5. Vendor Compliance/Non-compliance. The County shall be responsible for addressing issues of non-compliance with the vendor and ensuring timely implementation of corrective actions. The County shall work with the vendor to develop and monitor corrective action plans and take enforcement measures as necessary to ensure full compliance with this MOU and applicable operational agreements. 6. Confidentiality of Records. Parties agree to maintain confidentiality of any proprietary, sensitive, confidential, or patient/client information disclosed during the annual audit. All audit-related findings and communications shall be treated as confidential, unless otherwise required by law or regulating authorities. 7. Costs. a. Audit Costs. The County shall bear all costs associated with the annual audit described in this Section V.K. The County shall not charge the City Parties for any expenses directly related to conducting or procuring the annual audit of the Facility Operator’s financial records. b. Administrative Fee. Separately, the County may assess an administrative fee to recover reasonable costs associated with its management and oversight of the Facility, including fiscal administration, contract management, compliance monitoring, and coordination of reporting    Page 140 PAGE 9 OF 26 requirements. Any such administrative fee shall not exceed a reasonable percentage of total operating costs and shall be disclosed annually to the Oversight Committee as part of the County’s presentation of the Facility’s annual operating budget. 8. Dispute Resolution. Any disputes arising from audit findings or related matters shall be resolved in accordance with dispute resolutions agreed to between the County and vendors, and consistent with the broader dispute resolution process set forth in Section IX.J of this MOU. The County shall make reasonable efforts to mediate and resolve audit-related concerns in collaboration with the Facility Operator and the affected City Parties prior to escalation L. Oversight Committee. An Oversight Committee is hereby established, comprised of one (1) leadership representative from each participating jurisdiction, who shall be either the City Manager, Chief Executive Officer, or an Elected Official from such jurisdiction. The Oversight Committee shall provide high-level oversight of this MOU and ensure the effective deliverance of the mission. The Oversight Committee shall have the authority to review overall program performance, strategic direction, and compliance with the terms of this MOU. The Oversight Committee shall meet at least once annually to fulfill its duties under this MOU. M. Operations Committee. An Operations Committee is hereby established, comprised of one (1) representative from each participating jurisdiction who has technical knowledge of homeless and/or housing issues. The Operations Committee shall provide guidance on policy matters, regional collaboration efforts, and referral processes. The Operations Committee shall review statistical reports on a monthly basis and shall meet monthly to fulfill its duties under this MOU. The Operations Committee may make recommendations to the Oversight Committee regarding operational improvements, policy adjustments, and program effectiveness measures. 1. Committee Representation. Each participating jurisdiction shall designate its representatives to both the Oversight Committee and Operations Committee within thirty (30) days of executing this MOU. Jurisdictions may change their designated representatives upon written notice to a ll other Parties, provided that replacement representatives meet the qualifications set forth in this MOU. 2. County Responsibilities. In addition to producing and delivering the agenda to the City Parties and conducting meetings of the Committees, the County shall be tasked with the following: a) Facilitate communication and discussion during Committee meetings. b) Serve as public information officer related to actions of the Committees and matters related to the operation and management of the Facility. c) Provide research as needed for the Committees. d) Recommend policies for review or development, and ensure existing policies comply with all local, state and federal laws and guidelines by staying up to date with relevant laws and regulations. e) Administer a grants program for management and operation of the Facility, report to the Committees on available grants, oversee application for state and federal grants, and retain, disburse or seek reimbursement of grant funds as applicable.    Page 141 PAGE 10 OF 26 f) Require the Facility vendor for operations and management to submit an annual budget and present the annual budget to the Oversight Committee for review and consideration. 3. City Parties Responsibilities. In addition to serving in an advisory role to the County, the City Parties shall be tasked with the following: a) Review Operations Committee agenda materials and participate in meetings. b) Provide policy recommendations and review current policies as recommended by the County. c) Provide grant recommendations. d) Review and consider the Facility vendor for operations and management’s annual budget. e) Serve as ambassadors to further the Facility’s mission and vision. VI. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Facility will operate as a referral-only, low-barrier emergency shelter with comprehensive services designed to support individuals experiencing homelessness in stabilizing and transitioning to permanent housing. The Facility will be open 24 hours a da y, 7 days a week, 365 days per year, and will include three core program components: Emergency Shelter Services, Recuperative Care Services, and Sobering Center Services. A. Emergency Shelter Services The Facility will provide congregate and non-congregate emergency shelter accommodations for unhoused individuals referred by participating jurisdictions. Services will include meals, hygiene and laundry facilities, intensive case management, housing navigation, access to public benefits, life skills development, transportation assistance, and coordination with the Coordinated Entry System (CES). B. Recuperative Care Services Recuperative care addresses the critical gap between hospital discharge and safe housing for homeless individuals who require continued medical recovery but do not need acute hospital-level care. The Facility shall operate as a recuperative care facility providing temporary residential accommodations, basic medical oversight, medication management, wound care, assistance with activities of daily living, case management, and care coordination. These services are designed for homeless individuals recovering from illness, injury, surgery, or other acute medical conditions who cannot safely recover in traditional shelter environments or on the streets, with the goal of supporting complete medical recovery and facilitating transition to appropriate long-term housing solutions. C. Sobering Center Services The Facility will include a monitored space for individuals under the influence of alcohol or other substances who do not require hospitalization. Services will include medical monitoring, crisis intervention, substance use disorder referrals, and coordina tion with law enforcement and emergency services. D. Operations and Access Protocols    Page 142 PAGE 11 OF 26 The Facility will not accept walk-ins. All guests must be referred by an approved entity. A bed reservation system will be maintained to manage referrals and ensure capacity coordination. Upon discharge—whether voluntary or involuntary—the Facility Operator will coordinate alternate housing placement or provide return transportation to the originating city, except in cases involving individuals deemed violent or dangerous, in which case coordination with appropriate agencies (e.g., law enforcement, behavio ral health, probation/parole) will occur. E. Commercial Kitchen and Support Services The Facility will have a commercial kitchen capable of preparing up to 600 meals daily, accommodating dietary needs and complying with applicable food safety regulations. Guests will also have access to medical and behavioral health services, substance use disorder treatment referrals, discharge planning, aftercare coordination, and benefits enrollment. Services will be delivered in accordance with an Operations Plan developed by the County and the Facility Operator, reviewed by the Operations Committee, and approved by the host jurisdiction. F. Compliance and Oversight 1. Low Barrier. The Facility shall operate as a low-barrier navigation center accessible to homeless individuals and families regardless of income, mental health status, or substance use disorders. The Facility shall accommodate residents' personal belongings, pets, and partners within operational capacity. Barriers to entry shall be minimal, and case managers will provide individualized assessments and service plans based on each person's needs and available resources to support housing stability. 2. Facility Operations Parameters. The Operations Plan shall establish the Facility as a coordinated entry navigation center with the following operational requirements: a) Admissions Process. The Facility shall not accept walk-in admissions. All prospective residents must be referred through a participating jurisdiction, law enforcement or approved healthcare provider and transported by an agency, department, or organization that has been authorized by the County or a participating City Party to conduct outreach and make referrals to the Facility, before admission can occur. b) Resident Movement. Residents may leave the premises for activities that support their housing stability and personal well-being, including but not limited to healthcare appointments, employment opportunities, educational programs, family reunification efforts, faith-related activities, and other case plan objectives, subject to coordination with Facility staff and available transportation arrangements. For school-age children at the Facility, the Facility Operator shall coordinate with the appropriate local education agency, in accordance with the federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, to ensure safe and reliable transportation to and from school and related educational activities. c) Discharge and Transport. When a resident is discharged for non- compliance with facility requirements or voluntarily chooses to leave, the    Page 143 PAGE 12 OF 26 Facility Operator shall coordinate an alternative housing placement if possible. If not available, the Facility Operator will arrange transportation back to the city of origin. Discharges of residents who are deemed violent or otherwise dangerous shall be coordinated with appropriate agencies including law enforcement, behavioral health services, and/or probation or parole officers as necessary for public safety. d) Resident Agreement. Prior to admission, all residents must acknowledge and agree in writing to Facility requirements and applicable provisions of the Operations Plan. e) Plan Modifications. The operational provisions required by this section may not be modified or deleted without advance written approval of all Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the “No Walk-In / No Walk-Out” requirement described in Section VI.F.2(a) and the “Return to City of Origin” provision described in Section VI.F.2(c) are mandatory and shall not be amended, modified, or eliminated under any circumstances. G. Referral Policies and Protocols. Each Party agrees to develop comprehensive policies and protocols for referral of unhoused persons for their respective jurisdiction to the Facility. Policies and protocols developed by the City Parties shall comply with referral standards established by the County, the Continuum of Care’s Coordinated Entry System (CES) and may be subject to review and approval by the Operations Committee. 1. Bed Reservation System. A bed reservation system shall be established and maintained to coordinate Facility capacity and ensure efficient placement of referred individuals and families. Referring entities must secure a bed reservation through the CES prior to transportation to the Facility. Access to the bed reservation system may also be granted to prior identified entities, as approved by the County and the Operations Committee, for the purpose of coordinating referrals and monitoring placement activity. Bed reservations shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty-four (24) hours from the time of confirmation. 2. Transportation Responsibility. Transportation to the Facility shall be coordinated by the referring entity (which may include an approved outreach entity). The referring entity shall also coordinate arrival times with Facility staff and shall ensure timely delivery of referred persons within the bed reservation timeframe. 3. Waivers and Documentation. Waivers releasing and absolving the Parties of any and all liabilities shall be provided prior to admission to the Facility. VII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY PARTIES A. The City Parties agree to a pro rata share of costs related to Facility management as detailed in Sections VII.C and VII.D. B. Bed Allocation Based on Investment Level. Emergency bed allocations per investment level are as follows: 1. Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00): five (5) beds    Page 144 PAGE 13 OF 26 2. Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00): seven (7) beds 3. Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) and above: ten (10) beds 4. The balance of general beds shall be equally allocated to the County and City of Fontana. The County beds will be utilized via referrals from County departments. 5. Investments below Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) will not receive a bed allocation and will have access to unused beds if available. 6. Additional bed capacity may be purchased by City Parties at a rate of one hundred twenty-five dollars ($125.00) per bed, per night. Charges will be invoiced monthly by the Facility Operator and must be paid in full within thirty (30) days of receipt. C. The contributions of the City Parties for the first year of the operation of the Facility, payable to the County on or before the Effective Date, shall total Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) and shall be allocated among the City Parties on the basis g enerally of the size and population of each City Party and the estimated unhoused population within each jurisdiction for the year prior to the Effective Date. The prorated payment allocations for the initial operational year shall be as follows: 1. Chino: Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) 2. Chino Hills: Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) 3. Fontana: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) 4. Montclair: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) 5. Ontario: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) annually for the first three (3) operational years 6. Rancho Cucamonga: Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) 7. Rialto: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) 8. Upland: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) 9. County: Four Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($475,000.00) D. For the City of Ontario, this contribution shall be fixed at $250,000 per year for the first three (3) years of Facility operations. After the conclusion of the third year, Ontario shall have no further obligation to provide funding and shall not be entitled to refer or utilize the Facility thereafter, unless Ontario elects to extend the Agreement beyond three (3) years in accordance with Section III.A. E. Prior to payment, City Parties shall identify the source of funds for payment to ensure the eligible use. F. Thereafter, the contributions of the City Parties, payable to the County prior to each fiscal year in semi-annual amounts or an annual lump sum payment at the election of each City Party shall be adjusted in July of each fiscal year for the duration of this MOU by the value of the immediately preceding January Consumer Price Index for All Urban Con sumers for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, not to exceed five percent (5%) annually. Following    Page 145 PAGE 14 OF 26 the second (2nd) year of the operation of the Facility, the annual prorated payment allocations of each City Party for subsequent fiscal years shall be adjusted in accordance with the information provided by the most recent Point-in-Time Count, provided that the total annual contributions of all City Parties shall not be less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) per year. Agreed upon adjustments, if any, shall be based on good faith negotiations and written agreements between the Parties after review and audit of the actual usage by each Party and the actual cost of operation of the facility for the prior two - year period. For purposes of this section, a “fiscal year” means the twelve-month period beginning July 1 and ending June 30 of the following year. G. An annual evaluation of City Party cost allocations shall include a review of grant funds obtained for the Facility during the prior two -year period, and adjustments to City Party contributions shall reflect the impact of such grant funds. The annual evaluation shall also include a utilization review of Facility services by each City Party, and adjustments to contributions may be considered in light of actual usage levels. H. In the event that the County secures state, federal, or private grant funding that reduces the net operating costs of the Facility, the Parties agree that the annual prorated payment allocations of the City Parties shall be reanalyzed in good faith and adj usted downward to reflect the reduced costs. Any such adjustments shall be applied proportionally based on each City Party’s contribution level, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by all Parties. I. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this MOU, the responsibilities of the City Parties, and each of them, shall be limited to the foregoing monetary contributions. The City Parties shall not be responsible for any of the costs and expenses associated with the establishment, management and operation of the Facility and the provision of services at the Facility in excess of the annual contribution amounts set forth in this Section VII. In addition, none of the City Parties shall be responsible for the provision of any services at the Facility. VIII. PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICE A. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Chino for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. B. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Chino Hills for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. C. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Fontana for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. D. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Montclair for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with    Page 146 PAGE 15 OF 26 the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. E. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Ontario for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. F. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. G. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Rialto for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. H. City Manager or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the City of Upland for purposes of communicating with said city on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties, or any of them, in connection with this MOU. I. Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or his/her designee is designated as the principal representative of the County for purposes of communicating with the County on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this MOU and for purposes of any notice provided to the Parties or any of them, in connection with this MOU. J. Any Party may designate another individual as its principal representative by giving written notice of such designation to the other Parties. K. Notice. All written notices shall also be sent to the City Clerk of the respective City Party or the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for the County. Notice shall be deemed communicated two (2) County working days from the date of mailing. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Compliance with Laws. The Parties agree to be bound by all applicable, federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives as they pertain to the performance of this MOU. B. Governing Law. This MOU has been negotiated and executed in the State of California, and its validity and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties under the MOU, shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. This MOU is intended by each Party hereto to be deemed and construed to have been jointly prepared by the Parties, and the Parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted ag ainst any of them. C. Entire Agreement. This MOU supersedes any and all prior or contemporary agreements, either oral or written, between the Parties or any of them with respect to the subject matter of this MOU. This MOU contains all of the covenants and agreements    Page 147 PAGE 16 OF 26 between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this MOU, and each Party hereto acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any Party, except those covenants and agreements in this M OU. D. Amendment. No agreement, statement or promise with respect to the subject matter of this MOU which is not contained in this MOU shall not be valid or binding on any Party without a valid modification or amendment to this MOU in accordance with the approval of the governing bodies of each Party and pursuant to a written instrument signed by all Parties. E. Cooperation of the Parties. The Parties shall cooperate fully in the execution of any other documents and the performance of any other actions required to effectuate and implement this MOU and its terms and intent. F. Venue. In the event of any legal action, suit or proceeding to enforce or interpret this MOU, the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in San Bernardino County, California, and the Parties agree to and hereby submit to the jurisdiction of such court, notwithstanding California Code of Civil Procedure section 394. Furthermore, the Parties specifically agree to waive any and all rights to request that an action be transferred for trial to another county. G. Assignment. This MOU shall not be assigned by any Party without the prior written consent of all other Parties. H. Relationship of the Parties. Nothing herein is intended or shall be construed as creating the relationship of employer and employee, or principal and agent, between any Party, or any Party’s employees or agents. Each Party shall retain all authority for the rendition of services, standards of performance, control of personnel, and other matters incident to the performance of services pursuant to this MOU. I. Severability. If any one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this MOU and shall not affect, impair or invalidate any of the remaining provisions contained herein. J. Informal Dispute Resolution. In the event the County determines that service is unsatisfactory, or in the event of any other dispute, claim, question or disagreement arising from or relating to this Contract or breach thereof, the parties hereto shall use their best efforts to settle the dispute, claim, question or disagreement. To this effect, they shall consult and negotiate with each other in good faith and, recognizing their mutual interests, attempt to reach a just and equitable solution satisfactory to both parties. K. Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. If any legal action is instituted to enforce any party’s rights hereunder, each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees, regardless of who is the prevailing party. This paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorney’s fees directly arising from a third-party legal action against a party hereto and payable under Indemnification and Insurance Requirements. L. Review by Attorneys. Each Party hereto has had its attorney(s) review this MOU. Each Party hereto has consulted with its attorney(s) and has negotiated the terms of this MOU based on such consultation.    Page 148 PAGE 17 OF 26 M. Authorization of Persons Executing MOU. Each of the Parties to this MOU hereby represent that all necessary and appropriate actions of their governing bodies have been taken to make this MOU a binding obligation of the Parties hereto. The persons executing this MOU warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this MOU on behalf of and bind the Parties each purports to represent. N. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the obligations under this MOU. O. Counterpart Execution. This MOU may be executed in counterparts. Said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same MOU. This MOU shall have the same force and effect as if the original had been signed by all Parties .    Page 149 PAGE 18 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Dawn Rowe, Chair, Board of Supervisors Dated: SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Lynna Monell Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the San Bernardino County By Deputy    Page 150 PAGE 19 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF CHINO By: (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 13220 Central Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 151 PAGE 20 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF CHINO HILLS By: (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 14000 City Center Drive Chino Hills, CA 91709 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 152 PAGE 21 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF FONTANA By: (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 153 PAGE 22 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF MONTCLAIR By: (Authorized signature – sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 5111 Benito Street Montclair, CA 91763 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 154 PAGE 23 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF ONTARIO By: (Authorized signature – sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 303 E B Street Ontario, CA 91764 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 155 PAGE 24 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 156 PAGE 25 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF RIALTO By: (Authorized signature – sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 150 S Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 157 PAGE 26 OF 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each caused this MOU to be executed as of the dates set forth below by its duly authorized officers, on its behalf. CITY OF UPLAND By: (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink) Name: (Print or type name of person signing contract) Title: Dated: (Print or Type) Address: 460 N Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Approved as to form: (City Attorney)    Page 158 F1. Memorandum of Understanding for the West End Regional Navigation Center November 5, 2025 Background •Homelessness continues to present complex and growing challenges •Increased need for coordinated regional solutions •Exploring strategies that balance the needs of the entire community while recognizing broader systemic factors contributing to homelessness Regional & Local Context •2025 Point-in-Time Count •3,837 individuals experiencing homelessness countywide, including 2,636 unsheltered individuals •550 unsheltered in West Valley cities Regional & Local Context •Regional factors contributing to homelessness: –Housing affordability –Increased economic hardship for vulnerable populations (e.g., seniors) –Behavioral health system gaps –Lack of access to substance use recovery supports –Discharge from institutional facilities (e.g., hospitals, jails) without stable housing –Lack of emergency housing resources West End Regional Navigation Center 1110 9 J a s m in e St r e e t , Fo n t a n a •County of San Bernardino and West Valley cities, including: ‐Chino ‐Chino Hills ‐Fontana ‐Montclair ‐Ontario ‐Rancho Cucamonga ‐Rialto ‐Upland Service Model •3 integrated components within a single, coordinated facility: •Emergency Shelter: Low-barrier accommodations with meals, hygiene and laundry facilities, intensive case management, behavioral health services, housing navigation, transportation assistance, and benefits enrollment. •Recuperative Care: Temporary residential accommodations, medical oversight, and case management for individuals discharged from hospitals who require continued medical recovery but lack stable housing. •Sobering Center: A monitored space for individuals under the influence of alcohol or other substances who do not require hospitalization, providing medical monitoring, crisis intervention, and referrals to substance use treatment. Operational Overview •One-stop service model– On-site comprehensive support services include Behavioral Health, Substance Use Services, Public Health, Transitional Assistance, Workforce Development, and the Office of Homeless Services (OHS) for housing navigation and Continuum of Care coordination. •24/7 operations – Round-the-clock staffing, case management, and security; residents remain in place with an emphasis on stability and continuity. •Staffed by multi-disciplinary teams with a trauma-informed and person-centered approach. •Total of 200 beds – 100 emergency shelter beds, 100 recuperative medical care beds, plus a sobering center •Referral-only admissions – No walk-in admissions; all entries and exits coordinated for safety and care continuity •Low-barrier design – Guests may bring pets, partners, and personal belongings, reducing barriers to entry. Financial Structure •Shared regional investment model •County of San Bernardino investment: $20 million Capital + $5 million Operating Reserve •Annual operations: $3 million (shared by County and participating cities) •Tiered, pro rata city contributions based on population size, estimated number of unhoused, and access to local shelter resources •Bed allocation based on investment level •$200,000 = 5 beds •$250,000 = 7 beds •$300,000 = 10 beds •Investments below $200,000 will not receive a bed allocation and will have access to unused beds if available Operational Annual Allocations JURISDICTION ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT City of Chino $200,000 City of Chino Hills $200,000 City of Fontana $1,000,000 City of Montclair $250,000 City of Ontario $250,000 annually for the first three (3) operational years City of Rancho Cucamonga $300,000 City of Rialto $250,000 City of Upland $250,000 County of San Bernardino $475,000 Transportation Coordination •Transportation coordination from West Valley Detention Center to West End Navigation Center is a priority. •Establishing a direct transport link ensures those being released can immediately access services instead of returning to unsheltered conditions. •The transportation program can reduce the number of individuals reentering homelessness upon release, enhance community safety, and improve outcomes for people in crisis. Tim eline & Governance •Project currently in design phase •Construction estimated to take 9-12 months •Anticipated opening in summer 2026 •County responsible for acquisition of the Center, property start-up costs, and operation and management of the Center. •The provision of the services at the Center, will be conducted by a vendor selected by the County through a County-directed procurement process. •City represented on Oversight Committee and Operations Committee Recommendation 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the County of San Bernardino and participating cities for the West End Regional Navigation Center; 2. Authorize the allocation of $400,000 for the City’s participation in the West End Regional Navigation Center, including $300,000 for the City’s annual commitment and $100,000 for transportation services; 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to fund these costs utilizing any combination of eligible funding sources, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA), Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP), other state and federal homelessness programs, and National Opioid Settlement Funds. To the extent that such funds are unavailable or insufficient, the remaining balance will be funded from the General Fund using funds appropriated in the approved FY 2025/26 Budget; and 4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the MOU and take all necessary actions to effectuate the City’s participation in the West End Regional Navigation Center. Questions ? DATE:November 5, 2025 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director Sean McPherson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider a Request to Redevelop and Expand an Existing Beverage Distribution Facility Over Two Phases to Include Production, Bottling and Distribution Operations and Other Site Improvements, Including a Parking Garage and New Water Well, on Approximately 30.1 Acres of Land Generally Bounded by Haven Avenue to the West, 7th Street to the North, Utica Avenue to the East, and 6th Street to the South within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone. APN: 0209-411-002. -003, -004, -023, -024, -032, -034, -035. An Environmental Impact Report Has Been Prepared for This Project (SCH2023080369). (Related Records: a Design Review (DRC2023- 00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068) and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-086) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, adopt the corresponding Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve the following: Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00088), and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070) through the adoption of the attached resolution. BACKGROUND: The 30.11-acre project site currently comprises 8 parcels of land which are bounded by Haven Avenue to the west, 7th Street to the north, Utica Avenue to the east, and 6th Street to the south. To be clear, the project does not include the parcel at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street (APN 0209-41-101). The project area has a general plan land use designation of 21st Century Employment and is located within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME-2) zone. The project area also has a Corridor Frontage Overlay of Commercial and Retail along the Haven Avenue frontage extending to the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The project area is currently improved with 4 existing buildings which total approximately 208,575 square feet. This includes two office buildings located near the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street (9227 Haven Avenue and 9267 Haven Avenue), an existing beverage distribution Page 159 Page 2 3 1 1 0 warehouse facility near the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 6th Street (10670 6th Street), and an existing industrial building near the southwest corner of Utica Avenue and 7th Street (10655 7th Street). Other existing improvements include parking areas, truck loading areas, drive aisles and existing landscaping. There is a large unused area at the center of the site which is currently vacant covered in native and nonnative shrubs and grasses. Of these existing buildings, 9227 Haven Avenue and 10670 6th Street will be demolished. 9267 Haven Avenue will be renovated, and 10655 7th Street is to be determined to remain or be demolished as part of a proposed “Phase 2” at a later date. Figure 1: Vicinity/Aerial Photograph On October 8, 2025, the Planning Commission considered the item at a duly noticed public hearing. All commissioners expressed excitement and support for the project and were all in favor, however two commissioners did note that the project frontage along Haven Avenue did appear too industrial in its aesthetic and recommended that the developer consider additional architectural enhancements which might better integrate the project’s Haven Avenue frontage to the General Plan vision for the Haven Avenue corridor. Also, commissioners noted and concurred that the project achieves a critical economic development goal of attracting and retaining a Food Processing and Manufacturing Use, which has been identified as a target industry for the City.    Page 160 Page 3 3 1 1 0 After deliberation, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, adopt the corresponding Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve the associated entitlements. The Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes are included with this staff report as Attachment 6. ANALYSIS: Project Design and Layout The applicant proposes a two-phase redevelopment and expansion of an existing beverage distribution facility as described above. Phase 1 includes the construction of approximately 959,441 square feet of new building area which includes a new beverage Production Center (PC), Distribution Center (DC), an Automated Storage and Retrieval System (ASRS), an elevated truck deck, and associated parking and landscaped areas, new fences and walls. In addition, a new 4- story parking structure totaling approximately 208,444 square feet is also proposed to be built at the southerly end of the project area adjacent to 6th Street. The existing 32,890 square foot office building at 9267 Haven Avenue will remain and is proposed to be renovated into office space as part of Phase 1. The existing office building at 9227 Haven Avenue will be demolished. Lastly, Phase 1 also includes the construction of a ground water supply well located at the northwest corner if Utica Avenue and 6th Street. Currently, the applicant proposes to enclose this water infrastructure with a wrought iron fence. Phase 2 of the project includes two options wherein the developer proposes to either maintain the existing 62,210 square foot building at 10655 7th Street or demolish this building and replace it with a new 40,085 square foot building at the same location. This decision has not yet been made by the developer and the eventual option selected will depend on operational needs once the new facility is in operation. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed both Phase 2 scenarios. Lastly, Phase 2 will also include the construction and operation of a co-generation facility, which is an interior element of the primary building and is a component of the processing of beverages. The following images depict the proposed site plan, and various elevations and renderings which highlight the architectural theme of the development. For a full discussion on design and architecture, please reference the October 8, 2025 Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes included with this report as Attachment 6.    Page 161 Page 4 3 1 1 0 Figure 2: Proposed site plan noting location of referenced buildings. Fig. 3: South elevation of proposed project, representative of color scheme and massing. Fig. 4: West elevation of Haven Avenue office building, representative of office façade theme.    Page 162 Page 5 3 1 1 0 Fig. 5: Detail of Haven Avenue elevation of PC/DC/ASRS building. Fig. 6: Detail of Haven Avenue frontage looking south. Compliance with General Plan, Development Standards and Master Plan In addition to the Design Review application, the project applicant has applied for a Master Plan, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit and Tree Removal Permit. The Project has been reviewed by City staff to conform to all relevant standards and regulations upon approval of the master plan. The Project is also required to meet public art requirements. For a full discussion on the above items, please reference the October 8, 2025 Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes. As proposed, and given the unique nature of the “campus-style” development, and in order to meet all necessary development regulations, the applicant has requested establishing site- specific development standards as permitted through the Master Plan process to address the following development standards: Building Typology, Facades, and Articulation standards; Ground Floor Entrance requirements and Other Ground Floor Treatments (i.e. percentage of window openings); Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions; Build-to-Line and Frontage Area; Parking and Bicycle Parking Standards; Landscaping and Open Space Standards; Walls and Fences standards. A full description of requested site-specific development standards is included with this report as Attachment 3 (Master Plan). Staff notes that Development Code Section 17.22.020 establishes that the purpose of a Master Plan is to “allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to accomplish certain objectives, which include but are not limited to: 1) allowing development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zone or due to constraints of existing development standards; and 2) provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics.” In this case, the developer is proposing to expand an existing beverage distribution facility which has been in operation in the city since the 1980s. Further, approving the project also achieves a critical Economic Development goal of expanding food and beverage manufacturing uses in the City, which is an identified “Target Industry.” Further, the expansion of existing clean industrial uses is    Page 163 Page 6 3 1 1 0 expressly permitted with the 21st Century Employment District pursuant to the General Plan (Volume 2, Page 87). In summary, approval of the master plan to allow for the developer’s requested site-specific development standards would allow the existing business to remain in the city, provide additional jobs to the benefit of the community, and further our economic development goals to expand food and beverage manufacturing uses. Environmental Review Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2023080369) has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives and promote public participation. The intent of the EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed projects and identify feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. A summary of all project- related impacts and the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Final EIR which is included with this staff report, along with all other environmental documentation, as Attachment 4. The following summarizes key points in the environmental review process: Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as public notification that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purpose of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping meeting is to receive public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as it relates to the project and environment. Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting notice was prepared for the project and circulated on August 17, 2023, to the State Clearinghouse, public agencies, Native American tribes, and those interested parties who had previously requested notification. However, the NOP was subsequently cancelled to address a scheduling conflict regarding the Scoping Meeting; a revised NOP was prepared and issued on September 14, 2023. On September 28th, 2023, the City conducted a Scoping Meeting on the proposed project, the NOP and the EIR process but there were no attendees at the scoping meeting. The public comment period to respond to the NOP closed on October 13, 2023, and comment letters were received from the following: California Department of Justice, California Native American Heritage Commission, Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenter (SWMSRCC), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Californians Allied for Responsible Economy (CARECA). Written responses to all significant environmental issues raised were prepared and made available in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). AB 52 Compliance Formal notification in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 was sent on August 30, 2023, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the city. In response to these notices, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) responded and engaged in    Page 164 Page 7 3 1 1 0 consultation. SMBMI requested the inclusion of specific cultural resource protection language, which has been incorporate into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation formally responded to the AB 52 notification on September 29, 2023, during which the tribe requested the presence of a tribal monitor during all grading activities. Although no known tribal cultural resources were identified within the project area, mitigation measures have been added to ensure protection in the event of unexpected discoveries during site disturbance. Thus, the CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. Draft EIR Preparation and Circulation The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the DEIR was distributed on April 24, 2024, and the DEIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period beginning April 29, 2025, and concluding on June 13, 2025, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines The NOA included links to the full DEIR and technical appendices and was posted with the San Bernardino County Clerk, published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, and mailed to property owners within 660 feet of the project site as well as to individuals and organizations that requested notification. The DEIR was also submitted via CEQAnet to the California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation for distribution to relevant state agencies. The documents were also posted to the City’s website for public review during the same period. Hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public review at the following locations: Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; Paul A Baine Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739; Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Written comments on the DEIR were received from the following agencies and organizations: California Office of Planning and Research California Air Resources Board State Water Resources Control Board Southern California Gas Company Cucamonga Valley Water District South Coast Air Quality Management District Lozeau Drury LLP, on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility Blum, Collin & Ho LLP, on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and SWAPE Advocates for the Environment City of Ontario Traffic/Transportation Manager California Department of Transportation (Cal Trans) These comments and the City’s responses have been incorporated into the Final EIR. The DEIR, FEIR, technical appendices, and mitigation are available on the City’s website under the “CEQA Documents Available for Review” section, located at: https://www.cityofrc.us/community- development/planning Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) In compliance with CEQA, a mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted mitigation measure or project design feature that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure.    Page 165 Page 8 3 1 1 0 Findings of Fact in Support of Determinations Related to Significant Environmental Impacts The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the project would remain significant and unavoidable for certain issue areas. These impacts include air pollutant emissions which exceed SCAQMD daily Nox thresholds specifically for project operations, as well as an exceedance of regional construction thresholds even with implementation of all mitigations. Also, the project will result in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) which exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds. These impacts will remain after implementation of all feasible mitigation measures. As part of project approval, the City Council will be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations (included with the draft City Council resolution in Attachment 7), which acknowledges these unavoidable impacts. In addition to the project benefits which are highlighted in the Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations, the applicant has also provided a list of additional project benefits which is being included with this report as Attachment 5. In accordance with CEQA, the Final EIR, including responses to comments, was provided to all commentors on October 24, 2025, at least 10-days prior to the Council’s decision date. Also on October 24, 2025, staff was made aware of an email from Caltrans District 8 dated June 13, 2025, which included a misspelled email address. Due to this error, this June 13th letter from Cal Trans was inadvertently omitted from the Responses to Comments in the draft Final EIR document that was reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 8, 2025. When this error was realized, responses to comments were provided to this commentor on October 24, 2025, in compliance with relevant CEQA guidelines and the conditions of approval have been updated accordingly. Staff notes that none of the comments provided by Cal Trans result in any additional impacts or substantive changes which were not already considered by the Planning Commission. For reference, this letter and the City’s responses (titled “Addendum Memorandum to PC Draft FEIR”) are included with this staff report as Attachment 4, along with all other environmental documentation for the project. Correspondence A notice of public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the subject property, the site was posted, and a notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on October 22, 2025. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any comments in response to the City Council public hearing notices. Staff notes that prior to the Planning Commission public hearing, over 50 letters of support were received from individuals, other stakeholders and community groups, including some of those stakeholders who had previously commented on the Draft EIR. These letters may be reviewed separately as an attachment to the October 8, 2025, Planning Commission staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: The Project is expected to generate economic benefits to the City. In addition to required one- time permit and development impact fees, it is also anticipated that the project will create both temporary construction jobs and permanent jobs. Specifically, the project is anticipated to generate approximately 100 new jobs immediately and expand up to 289 permanent jobs beyond which already exist at the existing facility at full build out. The project will also generate approximately 400 temporary construction jobs. In addition, the increased employment could indirectly benefit other local businesses due to increased demand. The expanded facility is likely to create long-term positive economic benefits to surrounding businesses such as hotels, restaurants and other business support services. The project scale    Page 166 Page 9 3 1 1 0 and operational reach will serve as a key anchor for strengthening the City’s food manufacturing sector, which could attract complementary businesses. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future,” by positioning Rancho Cucamonga as a competitive hub for food manufacturing in the region. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Attachment 2 – Project Plans (via external link) Attachment 3 – Master Plan Attachment 4 – Environmental Documentation (via external link) Attachment 5 – Applicant’s List of Project Benefits Attachment 6 – October 8, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report and Meeting Minutes Attachment 7 – City Council Resolution    Page 167 Ha v e n A v e n u e 6th Street 7th Street N Project Boundary Legend Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph ATTACHMENT 1   Page 168 ATTACHMENT 2 Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link: El-Camino-Project-Plans    Page 169 50 50 50 45 S D SS T D U E D D S S UV D T CATCH BASIN TG=1084.17' |||| |||||| || || || VESSELS REBOILER UNIT CARBONSCAN CO2 COMPRESSORS GENERATING UNIT TOP & GAS COOLER RECLAIMER CARBONFILTER DEHYDRATOREXHAUSTER NOXFLASH NOX FLASH PURGE UNIT SUBSTATION 15kV SWGR J J J J J R R RR JR R J J J R R R R T T J J J J J R R RR JR R J J J R R R R T T 8FT CHAINLINK 12FT CHAINLINK SLOPED CHAINLINK VSEP BRINETANKER VSEP BRINE LOADOUT HOSECABINET VSEP BULK CHEMICALUNLOAD CABINET PB VAP PB VAP LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON EW 1 HW 1 HW 1 AD1AD1AD1 FS1 EW 1 HD4 HD4 HD4 AD 1 AD 1 AD 1 AD 1 200 GAL SUMP BULKUNLOADING BULK TR U C K H O O K U P HO O K U P WA T E R B A T H VA P O R I Z E R TRUCK UNLOAD STATION PB VAP N2 VAP LIQUIDNITROGEN VESSEL6,000 GAL PB VAP PB VAP UNISENSORBOX PA R K E R F I L T . AW N I N G EFFLUENT DISCHARGEMONITORING LINE T-3000 TREATMENTTANKNo.1 3,000GAL[8FT∅/9FT HIGH] T-4000 TREATMENTTANKNo.2 3,000GAL[8FT∅/9FT HIGH] P-2O10/2020SYSTEMFEED PUMPS T-2200CALAMITYSTORAGETANK 60,000GAL[20'∅/30'SWH] T-2000WASTEWATERSTORAGETANK60,000GAL[20'∅/30'SWH] MX-2000TANK SIDE WALL MIXER P-2210/2220CALAMITYFEED PUMPS T-500-AVSEP BRINETANKNo.120,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] J.B.J.B. T-2400H2SSCRUBBER CAUSTIC PUMPS CAUSTIC TOTE ACID PUMPS ACID TOTE T-500-BVSEP BRINETANKNo.220,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] T-500-CVSEP BRINETANKNo.320,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] VSEPBRINEDISCHARGEP-5010 P-5020 VSEP BRINEDEFOAMINGPUMPS ECP-5012 CR 8FT CHAINLINK 12FT CHAINLINK SLOPED CHAINLINK VSEP BRINETANKER VSEP BRINE LOADOUT HOSECABINET VSEP BULK CHEMICALUNLOAD CABINET PB VAP PB VAP LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON LIQUID CO2 VESSEL 50 TON EW 1 HW 1 HW 1 AD1AD1AD1 FS1 EW 1 HD4 HD4 HD4 AD 1 AD 1 AD 1 BULKUNLOADING BULK TR U C K H O O K U P HO O K U P WA T E R B A T H VA P O R I Z E R TRUCK UNLOAD STATION PB VAP N2 VAP LIQUIDNITROGEN VESSEL6,000 GAL PB VAP PB VAP UNISENSORBOX PA R K E R F I L T . AW N I N G EFFLUENT DISCHARGEMONITORING LINE T-3000 TREATMENTTANKNo.1 3,000GAL[8FT∅/9FT HIGH] T-4000 TREATMENTTANKNo.2 3,000GAL[8FT∅/9FT HIGH] P-2O10/2020SYSTEMFEED PUMPS T-2200CALAMITYSTORAGETANK 60,000GAL[20'∅/30'SWH] T-2000WASTEWATERSTORAGETANK60,000GAL[20'∅/30'SWH] MX-2000TANK SIDE WALL MIXER P-2210/2220CALAMITYFEED PUMPS T-500-AVSEP BRINETANKNo.120,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] J.B.J.B. T-2400H2SSCRUBBER CAUSTIC PUMPS CAUSTIC TOTE ACID PUMPS ACID TOTE T-500-BVSEP BRINETANKNo.220,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] T-500-CVSEP BRINETANKNo.320,000GAL[12'∅/24'SWH] VSEPBRINEDISCHARGEP-5010 P-5020 VSEP BRINEDEFOAMINGPUMPS ECP-5012 CR UP UP UP UP UP UP UP DN UP UP UP UP DNDN UP DN UP UP 509 MAINTENANCE MANAGER 524 ELECTRICAL CHASE 516 LAB 516A MICROLAB 522 SUGAR VESTIBULE 121 CONFERENCE 133 BREAKROOM 132 PRE-SHIFT MEETING 127 SHOWER 126 SHOWER 140 CORRIDOR 124 MEN 125 WOMEN122 JANITOR 120 ELEV. EQUIP. 101 LOBBY 100 SECURITY VESTIBULE 102 TRAINING ROOM B 103 TRAINING ROOM A 116 MAIL 136 CORRIDOR 119 WOMEN 118 MEN 117 ELECTRICAL 115 FILES ADMIN. TIMEKEEPING/ ROTATING OFFICE 114 108 OFFICE MANAGER OPERATIONS MANAGER/ ROTATING OFFICE 113 109 PLANT DIRECTOR 112 OE MANAGER 111 HR MANAGER 110 SR. HR MANAGER 107 OFFICE 106 PC OPEN OFFICE PC LOCKER ROOM 128A123 UNISEX FF = 86' - 0" 1074' - 0" AMSL FF = 86' - 0" 1074' - 0" AMSL 129 ELEV. EQUIP. 503 PARTS ROOM 510 CONTROL SUPERVISORS 511 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISORS 512 MAINT. SHOP 323 PACKAGING 501 PARTS MANAGER 502 PARTS COUNTER 507 MEN 505 WOMEN 508 PRODUCTION LOBBY 516B SENSORY LAB 518A CORRIDOR 518B UNISEX 144 CONFERENCE 137 CORRIDOR 138 CORRIDOR 141 VESTIBULE ST-06 STAIR 530 LUBRICANT 532 UNISEX 533 RECEIVING OFFICE 529 CORRIDOR 525B IDF 525 VESTIBULE 525A UNISEX 500 LOWER LEVEL PRODUCTION FLOOR 523 SYRUP ROOM 500A ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT EL-02 ELEVATOR 504 JANITOR 528 ELECTRICAL ST-17 STAIR 516D QA SUPERVISORS 512A TOOL ROOM EL-01 ELEVATOR ST-19 STAIR ST-08 ST-16 ST-15 ST-16 ST-23 ST-29 ST-24 ST-21 ST-31ST-25ST-27 DN DN DN DN DN DN 303 ELEC. 302 PRODUCT RETURNS 402 ASRS DOCK AREA 304 FIRE PUMP 313 UNISEX 315 WAITING 312 COFFEE 311 HUDDLE 310 OPS SUPERVISOR ST-09 STAIR 309 JAN. 305 UNISEX 306 UNISEX 307 UNISEX 308 UNISEX ST-10 STAIR 324 EMPTY PALLET VESTIBULE ST-31 ST-30 ST-08 ST-08 ST-08 ST-08ST-08ST-08ST-08ST-08 ST-07 ST-08 ST-26 UP UP 12 8 LA R G E LO B B Y CO N F . RO O M 10 2 WA S T E RO O M 10 5 CA T E R I N G 10 3 EL E C . 10 4 MA I L / R E C E P T I O N SU P P O R T 10 6 TI G E R JO E ' S BA R 12 6 EM P L O Y E E BR E A K RO O M 12 5 ME E T I N G RO O M 11 3 JA N I T O R 12 4 FI T N E S S ST O R A G E 12 1 RE S T R O O M 12 2 RE S T R O O M 12 0 WO M E N ' S LO C K E R S 11 8 ME N ' S LO C K E R S 11 6 RE S T R O O M 11 7 RE S T R O O M 11 4 MA I L / S U P P L I E S / ST O R A G E 11 9 FI T N E S S CE N T E R & ST O R A G E 11 0 ME C H A N I C A L 11 1 ME N ' S RE S T R O O M 11 2 WO M E N ' S RE S T R O O M 10 9 EL E V . EQ U I P . 10 0 LO B B Y / RE C E P T I O N 12 7 CO F F E E & VE N D I N G 10 7 TR A I N I N G RO O M 12 9 CO R R I D O R ST - 0 2 ST A I R 13 0 CO R R I D O R 13 1 CO R R I D O R 13 3 CO R R I D O R 12 3 VE S T I B U L E 13 2 CO R R I D O R EL - 0 1 EL E V A T O R 10 3 A 107A 107D 100A 10 4 128 E109 11 1 11 2 126C 126D 126E 126B 126A 125B 126F 13 1 125A 124A 124B 12 112 2 12 0 11 8 11 7 11 6 11311 4 102A ST - 0 3 ST A I R 10 8 TR A I N I N G ST O R A G E 133 110B 107B 110A 10 8 103B ST - 0 2 16 1 CO R R I D O R 102B 100B 10 7 WA T E R RO O M 10 1 TR A S H EN C L O S U R E 10 2 EL E V A T O R 10 3 ME C H RO O M UP UP UP EL E C T R I C S E R V I C E 10 4 ST O R A G E 10 5 BI K E S T O R A G E 10 6 10 6 10 4 B 104A 107 10 3 RA M P U P T O 2 N D L E V E L 10 0 J 10 0 G 10 0 H 100F 100E 10 0 D 100C100B100A SG 1 SG 4 SG 4 10 0 PA R K I N G SG 1 0 101 SG 3 TY P TY P TY P TY P TY P STOP STOP STOP STOP X > > > > > X > ST O P ST O P ST O P STOP WO R K I N G C L E A R A N C E WO R K I N G C L E A R A N C E GA S M E T E R BO T T L I N G GA S M E T E R CO - G E N X STOPSTOP || || || || EV VAN EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY EV VAN EV VAN EV VAN VAN VAN VAN VAN DO NOT BLOCK DO NOT BLOCK DO NOT BLOCK DO NOT BLOCK 6TH STREET HA V E N A V E U T I C A A V E INTERNAL ID.: PC INTERNAL ID.: DC INTERNAL ID.: ASRS EX I S T I N G OF F I C E 7TH STREET PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING PROJECT PROPOSES TWO (2) OPTIONS FOR PHASE 2 2N D L E V E L D O C K C A N O P Y RA M P 35.0' DRIVEWAY 6. 0 ' D E D I C A T I O N 26 . 0 ' FI R E A C C E S S ON L Y D R I V E W A Y 5 0 . 0 ' D R I V E W A Y 12 6 . 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 66 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 134.0'25' DEDICATION EX STORM DRAIN EASEMENT67.0'67.0' 440' LINE OF SIGHT 1 6 . 0 ' C V W D D R I V E W A Y 63 . 7 ' 440' LINE OF SIGHT 25 . 0 ' E X S T O R M DR A I N E A S E M E N T PROP RW CL EX RW EX RW EX RW CL 60.0' 27' 33' 66.0' 33' 33' PR 6' SIDEWALK PR 6' SIDEWALK 4 4 0 ' L I N E O F S I G H T 4 4 0 ' L I N E O F S I G H T 66 0 ' L I N E O F S I G H T 66 0 ' L I N E O F S I G H T INTERNAL ID.: OFFICE 21 0 . 0 ' 65 . 0 ' 80 . 0 ' 65 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 26'21'17' 64' 26 ' 26 ' 16 ' 68 ' 10 . 7 ' 11 ' S C E E S M T . 10' SE T B A C K EX RW PROP RW PR 6' SIDEWALK CL EX RW EX RW 858' 21 2 ' 73' 50 4 ' 412' 35 5 ' 373' 36 1 ' 267' 71 ' 191' 27 0 ' ±2 2 7 ' ±76' 4 4 0 ' L I N E O F S I G H T 2 6 . 0 ' F I R E A C C E S S D R I V E W A Y O N L Y CONCEPTUAL LOCATION FOR FUTURE CO-GEN SYSTEM 72'20' 52 ' 14 ' 47 ' 13 ' 22' 11' 22'5' 60'7' 36 . 0 ' DR I V E W A Y 22'33' 43 ' 50.0' DRIVEWAY 54 . 0 ' 27 ' 27 ' 22 ' 11 ' 22 ' 5' 32' 14' 4' 14'16'16' 5' 18'16'16' 37' 180' ACCESS EASEMENT (c)2025 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3801 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 300; RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PHONE: 951-543-9868 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM SUBMITTAL: APPENDIX M-3 EIR DATE: 08.18.2025LONE OAK - EL CAMINO 10670 6TH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 August 18, 2025 11:28:44am K:\RIV_LDEV\095468009 - Lone Oak-Rancho\CAD\Preliminary\CONCPET_MASTERPLAN.dwg DESIGN REVIEW DRC2023-00067 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 60 30 60 120 NORTH C002 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX M-3 EIR Summarized Landscape Standards, Development Code Requirements Development Code Requirement Code Standard Project Request Open Space/Courtyards Section 17.134.030 Projects over 3 acres shall provide two (2) open spaces. This includes: Pocket parks (no min.), Paseos, or Town Square. The Project will provide open spaces for employees and a public/private linear park space along Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Walls/Fencing Section 17.48.050.E Screening and walls shall be no higher than 8 ft in height within the industrial zone including screening of loading docks and reuse areas. The Master Plan shall allow perimeter wall, screening walls and decorative walls between 6 ft. to 14 ft. in height along the perimeter of the project site, primarily along the truck courts to screen mechanical equipment, truck areas, and elevated truck parking. Landscaping/Tree Ordinance- Removal and replacement Section 17.56.050, 17.56.080, and 17.80 Parking Lot Landscaping shall be required with a minimum of one tree per 3 parking stalls, 10% of the total off-street parking area with landscaping, a minimum of 5’ of perimeter of landscaping along side and rear proper lines and surface lots shall be screened. Existing trees shall be evaluated by an arborist. Removal of heritage trees shall be considered at a ratio of 1:1/2. For the Master Plan: A total of 24 trees were determined heritage trees by a certified arborist. A total of 110 will be replaced on site. This replacement exceeds the 3 to 1 replacement requirement. The trees will be located within employee break areas, along parkways, within green spaces, and enlarged setbacks and will not be required to meet the 1 tree per 3 parking stalls requirement Summarized Design and Development Standards of the ME-2 Zoning Designating Development Code Requirement Code Standard Project Request Building Typology Table 17.130.060-1 and Section 17.138.020. E.2 Sites greater than six (6) acres shall provide a minimum of three (3) building types: Main Street, Rowhouse, Courtyard Building, Multiplex, and Mid-Rise Building. The Master Plan will allow: two (2) building types including Mid-Rise and High-Rise Buildings. Building Typologies have been selected based on minimum development standards (i.e. setbacks, permitted heights, etc.) and not based on architectural design requirement. The building design is specific for an end user with specific manufacturing requirements and use needs. Building Facades Section 17.132.030-1 and Table 17.132.030-1 Mixed Employment Zones allows building entrances and facades that include: Shopfronts/Arcade and recessed variations, and Forecourt designs. The Master Plan will allow: architectural enhancements that reflect these architectural building facades/characteristics/design elements while maintaining the function for the operational needs of the facility. The office building along Haven Avenue, office areas on the primary manufacturing building have been enhanced with architectural elements consistent with the requirements of Section 17.132 and other enhancements including art applications, landscaping and screening details have been included to provide visual interest along Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Building Articulation Section 17.130.030 When a building façade exceeds 75 feet in length along a right of way the building must include the following: · At least one of the following: •Window bays •Recesses minimum of 3 ft. deep •Balconies · Also the Building must have one of the following: • Change in roof parapet height or shape • Change in building height The Master Plan will allow for the following: No change in roof parapet, change in height or the addition of window bays, recesses or balconies. In lieu of the these details, the Project shall provide articulated concrete walls with metal panels, glass, decorative screen walls, etc. Ground Floor Entrances Section 17.138.020 All entrances to non-residential ground floor uses must face and be visible and accessible to primary right- or way every 80 ft. The Master Plan shall allow the following: No entrances shall be required along Haven Avenue, 6th Street or Utica Avenue to serve the Project. Other Ground Floor Treatments Section 17.138.020 Corner Treatments shall be required per the code. Ground floor transparency for commercial ground floor uses is required with a minimum of 50 percent of commercial uses facing the street. Shade producing frontages such as awnings, arcades, and galleries shall be required on southern and western facing buildings. The Master Plan shall allow the following: Corner Treatments, balconies, ground floor transparency for commercial ground floor uses or shade producing frontages such as awnings, arcades, and galleries shall not be required for the Project. Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions Section 17.130.040.B Corridor fronting ground floor commercial and retail uses are required along Haven Avenue frontage. The Master Plan shall allow the following: No commercial or retail uses shall be required at the ground floor fronting Haven Avenue corridor. Build to Line and Frontage Area Section 17.130.050 and Table 17.130.050-1 75% of a primary frontage width and 30% of a secondary frontage width shall be within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 5 feet setback from the property line. The Master Plan will allow the following setbacks: Along Primary Frontage (Haven Avenue)- Minimum 25’-8” and maximum 50’4” from property line. Along Secondary Frontage (6th Street and Utica Avenue)- Minimum 15’-10” and maximum 78’-5” from property line. Buildings do not front on Utica Ave as parking and truck/dock doors are located along Utica Avenue. Therefore, measurements represent the frontage along 6th Street. Block Size/Building Configurations -High Rise Section 17.130.050.H Maximums: · A. Width: Min. 150ft Max 400ft. · B. Depth: Min. 150ft, Max 400ft. · Interior Side Yard Setback: None · Rear Yard Setback: 10ft. · Building Height: 132 ft. maximum. Proposed: · Width: Min. No Maximum. · Depth: No Maximum. · Interior Side Yard Setback: None · Rear Yard Setback: 5ft. · Building Height: 131ft. maximum Block Size/Building Configuration- Mid Rise Section 17.130.050.G Maximums: · Width: Min. 150ft Max 400ft. · Depth: Min. 150ft, Max 400ft. · Interior Side Yard Setback: None · Rear Yard Setback: 10ft. · Building Height: to eave/top of parapet Max. 80 ft. a. Overall Max. 92 ft Proposed · Width: Min. No Max · Depth: No Maximum · Interior Side Yard Setback: None · Rear Yard Setback: 5ft. · Building Height: 131ft. Site and Block Configurations Section 17.138.030 and Table 17.138.030-1 Blocks Sizes within the ME2: Block Face Length (max.) - 500 ft. Perimeter (max) – 2,000 ft. Blocks may exceed the maximum allowed face length if a paseo is included that cuts through the entire block. The Master Plan will allow: Block Face Length (max.) - No maximum Perimeter (max.) - No maximum Paseos, employee break areas and other parklets/green spaces are not required to extend the entire block length. Slip Lane/Street Frontage Where project sites or development sites exceed 500 feet along any right-of-way, a frontage road is required. The requirements for a frontage road is at the discretion of the director of Engineering Services. The Master Plan will allow the following: No slip lane or frontage road will be required when the Project site exceeds 500 feet along any right of way. Parking Standards – Manufacturing, Light- Large Section 17.64.050-1 Parking is required for warehouse, office and manufacturing per table 17.64.050-1 in the Development Code. Therefore, the Project would be required to provide approximately 806 auto parking stalls. Additionally, the Project would be subject to the TDM program and would be required to provide bike parking and locker facilities. The Master Plan will allow: a maximum number of 490 auto parking spaces. The Project would be subject to the TDM program and would be required to provide bike parking and locker facilities. Bicycle Parking 25 short term bicycle parking spaces and 25 long term bicycle parking spaces would be required for the project based on the 5% of the required parking The Master Plan will allow the following: 44 Bicycle parking spaces will be provided within the parking structure. No lockers would be provided. Signage Per the RCMU: Wall Mounted: One sign per building face - Maximum of 2 Sign Area: 150 sf per establishment Free Standing/Monument: 1 sign per street frontage Maximum Area: 24 sf Maximum Height: up to 8’ in height Maximum number: 1 per street frontage and may be increased to two per street frontage when signs are spaced a minimum of 300 feet apart or alternatively, the maximum arar may be increased to 48 sf when the sit frontage is longer than 500 feet. These can not be combined. Commercial/mixed use/industrial facilities are exempt from Table 17.74.080-1 Wall Mounted: · One Per Building Face - Maximum of 2 per street face Sign Area: 400 sf · Maximum Sign Copy Dimensions: Architectural Art Sign Installation: If 1 line of copy: A maximum of 10’ high X 92’ long per line with a maximum area of 1,650 sf per building façade. Standard Sign installation: If a single line of copy: 10’ high 40’ long per building façade If two lines of copy: 5’ high X 40’ long per line per building façade. Free Standing/Monument: · Up to 8’ in height · Sign Area: 36 square feet per sign face · Maximum number: 2 per street frontage with 300 feet apart Exterior Wayfinding: Including vehicular directional and pedestrian wayfinding signage. Freestanding Wayfinding Sign Height: Maximum of 14 feet Maximum sign area: 150 sq.ft of sign area (not including sign structure, pole, or architectural elements) (1). (1) Architectural element's shall be defined as oversized graphics, contour or dimensional sections of the sign that may protrude from the sign face or cabinet, glass/metal finishes or fixtures that enhances the sign or adds dimension. . Landscaping shall be per the site plan as shown. Conditional Use Permit - The Master Plan establishes that the proposed use is defined as "Manufacturing Light-Large" pursuant to Development Code Section Table 17.136.020-1 and is permitted upon the approval of a Conditional use Permit. Any warehouse and distribution component of the use is considered ancillary to the primary Light-Large Manufacturing use and is allowed under the same Conditional Use Permit. Attachment 3    Page 170 ATTACHMENT 4 Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link: Environmental Documents (Draft EIR, Final EIR, Technical Appendices, MMRP, Findings, and Draft SOC)    Page 171 El Camino Project Benefits Lone Oak-Rancho L.L.C/ Reyes Coca Cola Bottling 08/19/2025. CREATING VALUE FOR OUR EMPLOYEES •$600M invested in the project, 289 net new jobs, and almost 500 Employees onsite. •Best-In-Class Facility Aesthetics •Company specific spaces for Event/training spaces, Covered parking spaces, ZEV Charging, Fitness Center, Bike Storage CREATING ECONOMIC VALUE FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA •New Jobs in the region during the 2+ year construction timeline •Bottling lines capacity will meet current business needs and future growth for the company. •Local economic growth during construction (short term construction jobs and economic growth related to the purchase of materials, equipment, etc.) •Donations, Volunteer Hours & Presence in Community CREATING VALUE FOR OUR LOCAL COMMUNITIES •Onsite solar (2+ MW) and Cogeneration power system (3 MW) to support the facility power needs. •One of the best water stewards in the Coke system. Reclaims and re-uses water onsite before disposal to sanitary systems. •Have sustainable infrastructure using Nitrogen, Ambient Filling & Electric Vehicles onsite. •Interactive tour experience to educate the community on our business, our facility and our commitment to sustainability. •Onsite Recycling services •Offsite street improvements surrounding and adjacent to the property. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS •The Project applied for a series of entitlement actions including a Design Review, Master Plan and Sign Program to improve the site with a new ASRS, DC, and PC facility, consolidating operations onto one site with bottling, storage and distribution. •The Project will install enhanced linear parklets along Haven Avene and 6th Street including substantial tree installation/replacement along the public corridors and public spaces, and will be available as open space with shade, seating and other amenities. ATTACHMENT 5   Page 172 El Camino Project Benefits Lone Oak-Rancho L.L.C/ Reyes Coca Cola Bottling 08/19/2025. • The Project will provide improved transit facilities, including onsite bike and employee carpooling facilities and offsite improvements to the existing bus stop along Haven Avenue. • The Project will relocate existing public art within the site/project and provide additional public art along Haven Avenue and along 6th Street. • Construction of an additional local CVWD water well to support the Project. • There is no displacement of existing residential units as the Project includes the redevelopment of the existing distribution site.    Page 173 DATE:October 8, 2025 TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, AICP, Principal Planner Claudia Vargas, Associate Planner SUBJECT:LONE OAK-RANCHO, LLC - Recommendation to the City Council for a request to redevelop and expand an existing beverage distribution facility over two phases to include production, bottling and distribution operations and other site improvements, including a parking garage and new water well, on approximately 30.1 acres of land generally bounded by Haven Avenue to the west, 7th Street to the North, Utica Avenue to the east, and 6th Street to the south within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone. APN: 0209-411-002. -003, -004, -023, -024, -032, -034, -035. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for this project (SCH2023080369). (Related Records: a Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068) and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070)). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, adopt the corresponding Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve the following: Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068), and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070) through the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The 30.1-acre project site currently comprises 8 parcels of land which are bounded by Haven Avenue to the west, 7th Street to the north, Utica Avenue to the east, and 6th Street to the south. To be clear, the project does not include the parcel at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street (APN0209-41-101). The project area has a general plan land use designation of 21st Century Employment and is located within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME-2) zone. The project area also has a Corridor Frontage Overlay of Commercial and Retail along the Haven Avenue frontage extending to the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The project area is currently improved with 4 existing buildings which total approximately 208,575 square feet. This includes two office buildings located near the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street (9227 Haven Avenue and 9267 Haven Avenue), an existing beverage distribution warehouse facility near the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 6th Street (10670 6th Street), and an existing industrial building near the southwest corner of Utica Avenue and 7th Street ATTACHMENT 6    Page 174 Page 2 of 13 3 0 9 4 (10655 7th Street). Other existing improvements include parking areas, truck loading areas, drive aisles and existing landscaping. There is a large unused area at the center of the site which is currently vacant covered in native and nonnative shrubs and grasses. Of these existing buildings, 9227 Haven Avenue and 10670 6th Street will be demolished. 9267 Haven Avenue will be renovated, and 10655 7th Street is to be determined to remain or be demolished as part of a proposed “Phase 2” at a later date. Figure 1: Vicinity/Aerial Photograph. Note existing structures to either be demolished or remain. The table below highlights the existing surrounding land uses and corresponding General Plan and zoning designations: Table 1: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Context Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Existing office, warehouse, distribution, industrial and vacant 21st Century Employment District Mixed-Employment 2 (ME2) North Office/Industrial 21st Century Employment District Mixed-Employment 2 (ME2)    Page 175 Page 3 of 13 3 0 9 4 South Hotel/Industrial 21st Century Employment District Mixed-Employment 2 (ME2) East Office/Commercial/Industrial 21st Century Employment District Mixed-Employment 2 (ME2) West Office/Commercial 21st Century Employment District Mixed-Employment 2 (ME2) Entitlement Changes The applicant originally proposed a Development Agreement and Uniform Sign Program as part of the entitlement submittal package. Prior to the scheduling of the public hearing, the applicant withdrew their request for a Development Agreement and will instead be pursuing a Vesting Tentative Map under Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 16.49. The Vesting Tentative Map provides the developer with a statutory vesting process that locks in applicable ordinances, policies, and standards in effect at the time the Vesting Parcel Map application was deemed complete. Also prior to the public hearing, and upon further review, staff determined that the Uniform Sign Program entitlement was unnecessary and the applicant subsequently removed this entitlement from the application request. Staff notes that with these entitlement changes, the overall project scope, design, and operational intent remain unchanged. ANALYSIS: Project Design and Layout The applicant proposes a two-phase redevelopment and expansion of an existing beverage distribution facility as described above. Phase 1 includes the construction of approximately 959,441 square feet of new building area which includes a new beverage Production Center (PC), Distribution Center (DC), an Automated Storage and Retrieval System (ASRS), an elevated truck deck, and associated parking and landscaped areas, new fences and walls. The PC, DC and ASRS components of the project will be in one large building which is the focal point of the project located at the south-central portion of the project area (henceforth referred to in this report as the PC/DC/ASRS building). In addition, a new 4-story parking structure totaling approximately 208,444 square feet is also proposed to be built at the southerly end of the project area adjacent to 6th Street. The existing 32,890 square foot office building at 9267 Haven Avenue will remain and is proposed to be renovated into office space as part of Phase 1. Lastly, Phase 1 also includes the construction of a ground water supply well located at the northwest corner if Utica Avenue and 6th Street. Currently, the applicant proposes to enclose this water infrastructure with a wrought iron fence. Phase 2 of the project includes two options wherein the developer proposes to either maintain the existing 62,210 square foot building at 10655 7th Street or demolish this building and replace it with a new 40,085 square foot building at the same location. This decision has not yet been made and the eventual option selected will depend on operational needs once the new facility is in operation. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed both scenarios. Lastly, Phase 2 will also include the construction and operation of a co-generation facility, which is an interior element of the PC/DC/ASRS building and is a component of the processing of beverages.    Page 176 Page 4 of 13 3 0 9 4 Figure 2: Proposed site plan noting location of referenced buildings. Architecture and Site Planning The applicant proposes a variety of building materials throughout the site. Specifically, the PC/DC/ASRS building, which at 131 feet tall is the dominant feature of the project, will provide a façade on all elevations comprised of insulated metal paneling of various colors ranging from grey to red. Other elevations will include tilt-up concrete construction in addition to metal panel elements, except for the east elevation which will also include metal structural components to support a raised truck deck and ramp. Other street-facing facades throughout the project, such as the 41-foot-tall parking structure, combines insulated metal panels with metal mesh intended to screen the structure and provide design consistency throughout. Office building facades will    Page 177 Page 5 of 13 3 0 9 4 comprise metal and stucco elements, in addition to glazing and window surrounds comprised of metal paneling. Fig. 2: South elevation of proposed project, representative of color scheme and massing. Fig. 3: West elevation of Haven Avenue office building, representative of office façade theme. The Haven Avenue frontage (west elevation of the PC/DC/ASRS) is a design focal point. To meet the General Plan’s expectation that buildings within the 21st Century Employment District be closer to the street and provide ground floor transparency, while also trying to maintain internal security for the user, the applicant proposes opaque spandrel glass, exaggerated window surrounds made of metal paneling, and multiple vertical elements comprised of dark metal paneling. The window surrounds and vertical features protrude from the painted concrete tilt-wall to provide depth and includes double-high opaque spandrel glass window features so as to provide the presence of a two-story façade. The project also incorporates substantial pedestrian-oriented frontage improvements, which include a sidewalk with spaced shaded trees along Haven Avenue, a sidewalk with landscaped buffers along 6th Street, 7th Street and Utica Avenue. Streetscape enhancements feature two upgraded paving areas with seat wall along 6th Street and a protected cycle track along the 6th Street frontage, encouraging active transportation and supporting a cohesive streetscape. Together these improvements strengthen the areas mobility network, supporting transit readiness and create a more walkable connected environment. Fig. 3: Detail of Haven Avenue elevation of PC/DC/ASRS building. Fig. 4: Detail of Haven Avenue frontage looking south.    Page 178 Page 6 of 13 3 0 9 4 Relative to the images above, staff notes that the developer had originally proposed a frontage lane along Haven Avenue, as seen in the images above and plan set attached to this report. Staff determined that the frontage lane along this portion of Haven Avenue is not necessary, and it was therefore removed from the project. Staff has added a condition of approval requiring that all plans shall be modified accordingly for staff review and approval to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to building permit issuance. Compliance with General Plan and Development Standards The 21st Century Employment District is envisioned to provide for professional office and innovative businesses, and while residential uses are permitted, Volume 2, page 87 of the General Plan explicitly allows existing industrial uses to remain and expansions with clean industrial are allowed. In this case, staff notes that the use and user has existed at the site since at least the 1980s. With this provision, the General Plan allows for the expansion of this use. Regarding compliance with development standards, the project applicant has applied for a Master Plan to establish site specific development standards for several development criteria (see “Master Plan” section below). Please see the reference table below regarding the project’s compliance with relevant development standards: Table 2: Development Standards Compliance Table Development Standard Required Proposed Complies Floor Area Ratio (FAR)0.4 to 2.0 .89 Yes Setback – Haven Avenue 5 to 15 feet (min/max)Var. 25.8’ to 39.8’Yes* Setback – Utica Avenue 5 to 15 feet Var. 97’ to 110’Yes* Setback – 7th Street 5 to 15 feet Approx. 14 feet Yes Setback – 6th Street 5 to 15 feet Var. approx. 16’ to 78.5’ Yes* Building Height OALCP Requirements 131 feet Yes** Open Space/Landscape Standards 10%Approx. 19.3%Yes *Complies upon approval of the master plan **Building height is established by the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (OALCP). The applicant has applied for approval of building height by FAA pursuant to OALCP. Parking Pursuant to Development Code Sections 17.64.050, 17.64.090, and Table 17.64.050-1, parking for industrial uses is based on a combination of warehouse, manufacturing, and office square footages. Specifically, warehouse parking is calculated at a rate of 1 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, 1 per 2,000 square feet for the next 20,000 square feet, and 1 per 4,000 square feet thereafter. In addition, office areas require parking at a rate of 1 space per 250 square feet. Further, the Development Code requires one trailer loading stall for each dock door proposed. As such, Development Code Section 17.64.050 specifies the minimum number of passenger vehicle and trailer parking spaces required for a variety of land uses. A direct application of the Municipal Code parking requirements to the project results in 794 required spaces for passenger vehicles and 59 spaces for trailers. The table below demonstrates the project’s compliance with all parking standards:    Page 179 Page 7 of 13 3 0 9 4 Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Complies? Warehouse, Office, Manufacturing Warehouse - 1 per 1,000 sf for the first 20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf, and 1 per 4,000 sf for remaining sf Office - 1 per 250 sf Manufacturing - 2 per 1,000 sf 794 521 YES* Trailer Loading 1 per loading dock 59 87 Yes *Complies with the parking study forecasted parking demand and master plan The project will provide 521 auto parking stalls, 87 trailer parking stalls, 57 truck dock doors, and 4 at grade dock doors. Of the auto parking stalls, nine would be ADA accessible and 25 would allow for Electric Vehicle (EV) charging, per the California Building Code (CBC). 20 percent (five stalls) of all EV charging stalls would be constructed prior to occupancy of Phase 1 Project operations while the remainder would be provided prior to occupancy of Phase 2. A parking analysis was prepared for the project which anticipated parking demand over a typical 24-hour period. The peak parking demand was estimated to be 464 spaces from 11:00AM to 12:00PM using the employment projections for the site and assuming every employee on-site generated demand for one parking space. Based on this information, the applicant has also requested site-specific parking requirements pursuant to their Master Plan request which are based on the project’s parking analysis. Staff notes that the project involves a single-tenant user, thus there is a high degree of confidence in the parking analysis provided, as opposed to if the project included a multi-tenant commercial center or a speculative development where the end- user was not known. Thus, staff recommends that this customization of parking requirements be approved as part of the master plan request. In short, between the parking analysis for the project and the proposed site-specific development standard for parking established in the project’s Master Plan, parking is sufficient. Landscaping The project proposes significant landscaping along the project frontage and internal employee areas around office and building entrances. In particular, landscaping along the Haven Avenue and 6th Street frontage is designed to imitate urban parklets, wherein features such as enhanced paving and low seat walls invite pedestrians into the project perimeter. The project complies with applicable landscape standards. The project includes the planting of approximately 269 new trees, consisting of a mix of 24-inch and 36-inch box sizes. Species include Brisbane Box (Lophostemon confertus) and Chines Pistache (Pistacia chinensis), which will be used as primary shade trees. Other trees such as Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) and Marina Strawberry Tree (Arbutus ‘Marina’) are included throughout the site to enhance visual appeal and ecological value. The remainder of the landscaped areas will feature ornamental groundcover, drought tolerant shrubs and flowering accent plants designed to support water-efficient, low-maintenance site aesthetics. New Cucamonga Valley Water District Well As part of the project’s initial phase, a new groundwater supply well will be constructed at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue. This well will serve as a dedicated water source    Page 180 Page 8 of 13 3 0 9 4 for the project and will be designed and built to meet the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) standards and requirements. It will have the capacity to meet the project’s peak water demand of approximately 1,270 gallons per minute. A 16-foot-wide driveway is proposed to provide CVWD with direct access for operations, maintenance and monitoring. To connect the well to the existing water system, the project will install approximately 2,700 linear feet of 12- inchater transmission pipe. The pipeline will run from the well site to 6th Street right of way, continue east along 6th Street, then turn north along 6th Street, then turn north along Cleveland Avenue before tying into an existing inlet that supplies two steel tank reservoirs. These reservoirs are located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Cleveland Avenue, just northeast of the project site. The well site and all related facilities will be enclosed with security fencing and screened to ensure safe operation and to limit access to authorized CVWD personnel. Entitlements Required for Proposed Development In addition to the Design Review application, the project applicant has applied for a Master Plan, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit and Tree Removal Permit. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.14.060.B, “when a proposed project requires more than one permit with more than one approving authority, all project permits shall be processed concurrently, and final action shall be taken by the highest-level designated approving authority for all such requested permits.” The Master Plan included in the entitlement package requires City Council review and approval pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.020. Accordingly, the City Council is the approving authority for this project. Therefore, the Planning Commission is the recommending body for the entitlements. Master Plan (DRC2023-00072):Development Code Section 17.22.020 establishes that the purpose of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to accomplish certain objectives, which include but are not limited to: 1) allowing development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zone or due to constraints of existing development standards; and 2) provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. In this case, the developer is proposing to expand an existing beverage distribution facility which has been in operation in the city since the 1980s. The project would allow the existing business to remain in the city, provide additional jobs to the benefit of the community, and further our economic development goals to expand manufacturing uses. The proposed project cannot meet the strict criteria of all current development standards and the applicant has proposed a Master Plan to allow development of an exceptional project while providing flexibility beyond conventional zoning regulations. Specifically, the applicant has requested establishing site-specific development standards as permitted through the Master Plan process to address the following development standards: Building Typology; Building Facades; Building Articulation; Ground Floor Entrances; Other Ground Floor Treatments; Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions; Build-to-Line and Frontage Area; Parking Standards; Bicycle Parking; Signage; Open Space Standards and Walls and Fences.. A full description of requested site-specific development standards is included with this report as Exhibit C (Master Plan). Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713): The proposed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map would consolidate the eight existing parcels within the approximately 30.1-acre project site and subdivide them into three new parcels to support the development of the project. Parcel 1 would be approximately 25.43 acres and would accommodate the    Page 181 Page 9 of 13 3 0 9 4 new industrial building, the proposed parking structure, surface parking areas and renovated office building. Parcel 2 would be approximately 0.68 acres and would be dedicated for new site access from 7th Street, providing a direct vehicular ingress and egress to the project and Parcel 3 would be approximately 3.89 acres and would contain the existing 7th Street warehouse building and associated parking. The subdivision layout reflects the intended functional use of the site. Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068): The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Table 17.136.020-1 of the City’s Development Code to allow Manufacturing, Light-Large. Staff notes that any distribution component of the business is considered ancillary to the primary Light-Large Manufacturing use. Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070): Across the site currently, there are 257 trees which would be removed as part of this project. Of these, 24 trees are heritage trees. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.16.080, a tree removal permit is required for the removal of heritage trees. The applicant has provided an arborist report detailing these trees to be removed, which is included with this report as an appendix to the Environmental Impact Report. Staff notes that pursuant to Section 17.80.040, these 24 Heritage Trees are proposed for removal and would be replaced accordance with the City’s tree replacement standards, which require specific replacement amounts based on the size and type of each tree. Accordingly, the landscape plan proposes approximately 269 new trees that would provide a mix of shade, screening and ornamental planting consistent with City requirements. Public Art The project is subject to the public art requirement provided in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The requirement is calculated at one dollar per square foot of building area, exclusive of parking structures. Considering the project involves the demolition of existing structures, the retention and remodeling of other structures, the two options within Phase 2, staff estimates that the public art valuation for this project will be approximately $775,000 square feet. This estimated valuation for public art will be determined prior to building permit issuance. Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Boling and Daniels) reviewed the project on May 7, 2024. Committee members had general comments regarding the project’s architecture and design, and site planning. At the DRC meeting, committee members also discussed the need to screen the CVWD water well infrastructure from public view. Upon consulting with CVWD, staff notes that the screening of water well infrastructure is not permitted by CVWD. Thus, the applicant will propose wrought-iron security fencing around the CVWD water well. No members of the public attended the DRC meeting to speak on the item, and the Design Review Committee recommended that the item be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented. Environmental Review Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2023080369) has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives and promote public participation. The contents of the EIR become a planning tool for the Planning Commission to use in determining the appropriate and best land use for the project site.    Page 182 Page 10 of 13 3 0 9 4 The intent of the EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed projects and identify feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. A summary of all project- related impacts and the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Final EIR. The following summarizes key points in the environmental review process. Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as public notification that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purpose of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping meeting is to receive public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as it relates to the project and environment. Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting notice was prepared for the project and circulated on August 17, 2023, to the State Clearinghouse, public agencies, Native American tribes, and those interested parties who had previously requested notification. However, the NOP was subsequently cancelled to address a scheduling conflict regarding the Scoping Meeting; a revised NOP was prepared and issued on September 14, 2023. On September 28th, 2023, the City conducted a Scoping Meeting on the proposed project, the NOP and the EIR process but there were no attendees at the scoping meeting. The public comment period to respond to the NOP closed on October 13, 2023, and comment letters were received from the following: California Department of Justice, California Native American Heritage Commission, Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenter (SWMSRCC), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Californians Allied for Responsible Economy (CARECA). Written responses to all significant environmental issues raised were prepared and made available in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). AB 52 Compliance Formal notification in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 was sent on August 30, 2023, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the city. In response to these notices, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) responded and engaged in consultation. SMBMI requested the inclusion of specific cultural resource protection language, which has been incorporate into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation formally responded to the AB 52 notification on September 29, 2023, during which the tribe requested the presence of a tribal monitor during all grading activities. Although no known tribal cultural resources were identified within the project area, mitigation measures have been added to ensure protection in the event of unexpected discoveries during site disturbance. Thus, the CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. Draft EIR Preparation and Circulation The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the DEIR was distributed on April 24, 2024, and the DEIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period beginning April 29, 2025, and concluding on June 13, 2025, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines The NOA included links to the full DEIR and technical appendices and was posted with the San Bernardino County Clerk, published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, and mailed to property owners within 660 feet of the project site as well as to    Page 183 Page 11 of 13 3 0 9 4 individuals and organizations that requested notification. The DEIR was also submitted via CEQAnet to the California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation for distribution to relevant state agencies. The documents were also posted to the City’s website for public review during the same period. Hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public review at the following locations: Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; Paul A Baine Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739; Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Written comments on the DEIR were received from the following agencies and organizations: California Office of Planning and Research California Air Resources Board State Water Resources Control Board Southern California Gas Company Cucamonga Valley Water District South Coast Air Quality Management District Lozeau Drury LLP, on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility Blum, Collin & Ho LLP, on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and SWAPE Advocates for the Environment City of Ontario Traffic/Transportation Manager These comments and the City’s responses have been incorporated into the Final EIR. The DEIR, FEIR, technical appendices, and mitigation are available on the City’s website under the “CEQA Documents Available for Review” section, located at: https://www.cityofrc.us/community- development/planning and can also be accessed by clicking on the hyperlink in Exhibit D. Prior to the public hearing, staff received a number of comment letters and emails expressing support of the project. These documents are included with this staff report as Exhibit E. Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) In compliance with CEQA, a mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted mitigation measure or project design feature that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure. Findings of Fact in Support of Determinations Related to Significant Environmental Impacts The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the project would remain significant and unavoidable for certain issue areas. These impacts include air pollutant emissions which exceed SCAQMD daily Nox thresholds specifically for project operations, as well as an exceedance of regional construction thresholds even with implementation of all mitigations. Also, the project will result in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) which exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds. These impacts will remain after implementation of all feasible mitigation measures. As part of project approval, the City Council will be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations which acknowledges these unavoidable impacts. In addition to the project benefits which are highlighted in the Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations, the applicant has also provided a list of    Page 184 Page 12 of 13 3 0 9 4 additional project benefits which is being included with this report as Exhibit H. Correspondence A notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on September 22, 2025, notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet and other interested parties who had requested such notice on September 23, 2025, and the site was posted with a notice on September 24, 2025. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any comments in response to the advertised public hearing notices. FISCAL IMPACT: The Project is expected to generate economic benefits to the City. In addition to required one- time permit and development impact fees, it is also anticipated that the project will create both temporary construction jobs and permanent jobs. Specifically, the project is anticipated to generate approximately 289 permanent jobs beyond which already exist at the existing facility, and approximately 400 temporary construction jobs. In addition, the increased employment could indirectly benefit other local businesses due to increased demand. The expanded facility is likely to create positive economic benefits to surrounding businesses such as hotels, restaurants and other business support services. The project scale and operational reach will serve as a key anchor for strengthening the City’s food manufacturing sector, which could attract complementary businesses. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future,” by positioning Rancho Cucamonga as a competitive hub for food manufacturing in the region. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A – Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Exhibit B – Project Plans Exhibit C – Master Plan Exhibit D – Link to Environmental Documents (Draft EIR, Final EIR, Technical Appendices, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, EIR Findings and Draft SOC) Exhibit E – Comments Received in Support of the Project Exhibit F – Applicant’s List of Project Benefits Exhibit G – Design Review Committee Comments Exhibit H - Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval    Page 185 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 1 of 6 2 8 3 1 Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda October 8, 2025 Draft Minutes Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on October 8, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz. Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer; Caleb Richards, Senior Landscape Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant. B. Public Communications Chairman Morales opened the public communications. Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 24, 2025. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Daniels. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D. Public Hearings D1. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW – NABEEL SALHAB – A request to construct an approximately 6,201 square-foot, two-story single-family residence with a 1,108 square-foot attached garage on a 22,888 square-foot undeveloped lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential Zone with Hillside and Equestrian Overlays located at 10842 Carriage Drive - APN: 1074-531-14. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures (DRC2025-00106). Senior Landscape Planner Richards provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Mr. Yousef, representing the applicant, was present and available to answer questions. Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing. Commissioner Dopp indicated he had no issues with the project. It meets parameters.    Page 186 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 2 of 6 2 8 3 1 Commissioner Daniels stated that the project is compatible with the surrounding homes and meets all the code requirements. Commissioner Diaz commented that it is a large, beautiful home and expressed excitement about a new family moving in. Vice Chairman Boling thanked the applicant for a well-thought-out design, noting that it complements the neighborhood. He said the project complies with existing development code standards and addresses the city’s need to provide a range of housing types. Chairman Morales thanked the developer for collaborating with staff to create a project that fits well within the neighborhood. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution 2025-031 approving Hillside Development Review DRC2025-00106. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D2. LONE OAK-RANCHO, LLC - Recommendation to the City Council for a request to redevelop and expand an existing beverage distribution facility over two phases to include production, bottling and distribution operations and other site improvements, including a parking garage and new water well, on approximately 30.1 acres of land generally bounded by Haven Avenue to the west, 7th Street to the North, Utica Avenue to the east, and 6th Street to the south within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) Zone. APN: 0209-411-002. -003, -004, -023, -024, -032, -034, -035. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for this project (SCH2023080369). (Related Records: a Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068) and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070)). Principal Planner McPherson provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted, for context, that the Planning Commission is a recommending body on this item. Following deliberation, the item will move forward to the City Council for final consideration. He noted a typo in the staff report regarding EV stalls, clarifying it should indicate 52 EV stalls and not 25. Additionally, he pointed out an error in the title of the Resolution, stating that the term “Vesting” should be included in reference to the Tentative Parcel Map. Commissioners were provided with a redlined version of the corrected Resolution on the dais for review. He also mentioned that, in reference to Exhibit E, many of the letters were duplicates, and this will be corrected prior to the item being presented to the City Council. Commissioner Dopp inquired about Phase 2, noting that the intended use of the building remains unclear. He asked whether it could potentially return to the Planning Commission as a conditional use item. Principal Planner McPherson responded that Phase 2it may come back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Dopp asked staff whether any information on truck routes was provided by the developer. Principal Planner McPherson responded that he would defer that question to the developer. Commissioner Daniels asked staff to explain the reason for not wanting the slip lane on Haven Avenue and why it was deemed unnecessary. Principal Planner McPherson answered that slip lanes in general will no longer be required along Haven south of the railroad tracks for any property. Chairman Morales opened the public hearing. Principal Planner McPherson announced that the applicant will be making a supplemental slideshow presentation, which included a fly through video (copies on file). Following the presentation, the applicant was available to answer questions. The following individuals spoke in support of the project: Ben Pratt; Eddie Campos; Cesar Lamas; Robert Hufnagel; Louie Lopez; Jerry Delamose.    Page 187 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 3 of 6 2 8 3 1 For the record, the following correspondence expressing support for the project was received after the preparation of the agenda packet. The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Inland Empire Economic Partnership Southern California District Council of Laborers Special Olympics Southern California Additionally, a letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce was received at the meeting and filed by the Executive Assistant. Commissioner Dopp asked the applicant about the anticipated truck traffic through the city. Applicant responded that the truck traffic would not change from what it currently is and will primarily use the I-10 and I-15 freeways. Commissioner Daniels expressed he liked the appearance and colors of the building. He asked whether the materials used for the colors would fade over time. Applicant responded that the materials were specifically selected to resist fading over the 30-year lifespan of the panels. Commissioner Daniels asked where they stand with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval. Applicant replied that they have received full approval from the FAA and have submitted their application to the City of Ontario for their approval as well. Commissioner Diaz inquired about the truck traffic and heard that it may decrease, as certain operations will now be performed on-site that were previously performed off-site. Applicant confirmed that, as part of their production process, some raw materials will now be created on- site, which will reduce the number of supply trucks needed. Commissioner Diaz asked the applicant to explain their interactive tours and what that would look like. Applicant explained that the tour is designed is avoid active operations on the production floor, creating a separate path through the facility. They would like to make it available for visits to both internal and external visitors with approval from local management. The intent is to welcome visitors and share the company’s story with a particular focus on sustainability, which will be integrated throughout the facility. Vice Chairman Boling commented on the City’s ongoing efforts to incorporate active transportation elements into development projects and city infrastructure. He said that a significant investment was made in the cycle track bicycle lane along Sixth Street, and that the slip lane along a portion of Haven Avenue was removed to accommodate an additional bike lane. Given the facility’s location and its proximity to major public transportation infrastructure, including the Brightline and Metrolink stations, he inquired about on-site amenities available to support and encourage employees to commute by bicycle. Specifically, he asked whether the facility would provide secure bike lockers and/or bike racks. Applicant confirmed that the facility will have a secured parking structure that will allow access to bikes, as well as charging stations for electric vehicles. Principal Planner McPherson added that there are 44 bike stalls located within the parking structure. Chairman Morales acknowledged the applicant’s significant investment of $600 million for the development of the state-of-the-art campus and asked how much future capacity growth the facility is designed to accommodate. Applicant responded that while growth is planned on the distribution side, it will not be significant. On the production side, they will start with five production lines but have the capacity to expand to seven production lines, representing a 40% increase. He added that, as with any bottling plant, there will be opportunities    Page 188 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 4 of 6 2 8 3 1 for organic growth by improving efficiency on existing lines, providing additional room for expansion as operations progress. Chairman Morales stated that along Sixth Street there are cylinder shaped objects and asked if they have considered placing art on those cylinders. Applicant responded that they have not considered it but if the Commissioners would like them to do so, they will discuss further with staff. Commissioner Daniels asked what their timing is on the project once they get the approvals. Applicants answered that they will start as soon as possible. Chairman Morales mentioned that the lights on the top of the tallest building must be reported to the FAA if they go out. He asked whether the contact number for the FAA will be posted for immediate access. Applicant confirmed that they have a sophisticated emergency response plan in place. Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing. Commissioner Dopp stated that he has been the most critical on the Commission of warehouse industrial development. He expressed concerns about the frontage on Haven and questioned the ability and direction of both the General Plan and even the Council goals regarding their vision for major corridors. He feels they lose a little bit of that by getting rid of the second office building and it is mostly a warehouse that is fronting Haven. He suggested that the City Council may want to think about the Haven Avenue frontage a little bit further. He also addressed pollution concerns, specifically greenhouse gas emissions, and the high concentration of warehouses in the area. He expressed appreciation for the efforts Coca-Cola and Reyes are making to their facility as environmentally friendly but emphasized that pollution remains a concern for him. He encouraged Reyes to consider expanding their electric vehicle fleet if the opportunity arises. He added that the project, aside from his concerns about the Haven frontage, is appropriate and beneficial for the community. He said regarding potential murals and as a member of the Public Art Committee, the other committee members tend to be very cautious and wary about these bigger projects that come up and that their complaint is that they do not have a lot of input. He recommended as part of any mural to think about the city at large, maybe good sources of inspiration from the city’s heritage. He commended the office space and the features that give it a “headquarters” feel, which aligns with the City’s vision. He expressed appreciation for the design, beside the Haven frontage, the landscaped urban parklets and the green space planned for the site, and the use of color throughout the property. Commissioner Daniels commended the development, highlighting the many aspects involved and the various permits required. He expressed that it is a very good project that will benefit the community and the area. He appreciated hearing that the project will move forward promptly. He also thanked those who attended the meeting and shared their perspectives. Commissioner Diaz concurred with the other commissioners, stating that it is a fantastic project for the community. She acknowledged concerns regarding the Haven frontage, viewing it as a negative aspect, and hopes efforts will be made to enhance its aesthetic appeal for those traveling along Haven. She commended the thoughtful consideration given to both the community and employees, describing it as impressive. She expressed enthusiasm about Coca-Cola remaining and growing in the city and thanked the audience members who highlighted the importance of the project, and the collaborative efforts involved.    Page 189 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 5 of 6 2 8 3 1 Vice Chairman Boling stated that this is one of the largest projects of this type that has come before the city in quite some time. He said as it pertains to the EIR, he wanted to make it clear what the Planning Commission’s role is to ensure the EIR was conducted at the appropriate level and then submitted to the City Council, as the Commissioners are just the recommending body. He expressed appreciation that the applicant has electric trucks in their fleet, the project has a number of onsite infrastructure investments for environmental facilities of various types and that the air pollution issues that may be called out in an EIR of this type are more of a regional issue. He said as it pertains to the project overall, the applicant’s business has been a long-term member of this community and continues to make a significant investment in the city and the region. The business is a major employer bringing in a high-level of employment to the area, offering competitive jobs to Rancho residents as well as others in the Inland Empire and beyond. He said we cannot lose sight as to why a city exists, it is to maintain and grow the economic value of a community, and how we do it is to provide a high level of municipal services. Having this business continue to invest and expand in our city translates to the city’s success. He believed it was a thoughtful design and met the vision for the future, not only for its operational use but also for the employees that work there. In regard to Public Art, he said that with the magnitude of the possible investment, it is a major opportunity to create a keystone component not only for Reyes but for the city and the region’s tourism and marketing plan. He asks that the same level of care and detail that they placed on getting the building and site layout done, be devoted for the selection and installation of the Public Art. Chairman Morales expressed his appreciation to the developer for the state-of-the-art world class campus. He thanked the applicant for their investment in the community, and for their two-years of work to get this going. He thanked them for designing the campus with their employees in mind. He also thanked the attendees for their helpful comments tonight and for participating in this important project for our city. Commissioner Dopp mentioned that the Economic Development Department has emphasized the importance of attracting key industries to the city to create a diversified economy and provide higher-level jobs, reducing reliance on warehouses. He highlighted that food and beverage manufacturing is one of these important industries and commended the applicant for contributing to this goal. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution 2025-032 as amended recommending that the City Council approve Design Review DRC2023-00067, Master Plan DRC2023-00072, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map SUBPTM20713, Conditional Use Permit DRC2023-00068 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2023-00070. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. Director Announcements Principal Planner McPherson announced that last week the Planning Department was recognized at a statewide-level and received the California American Planning Association (APA) award of merit for Planning Agency. He also mentioned that in a few weeks, we have a full agenda with six or seven items. F. Commission Announcements Vice Chairman Boling mentioned that last week he attended the APA Conference, participated in numerous sessions and received annual legal updates. Most importantly was a recognition of the City’s Planning Agency with the award of merit recognizing the professionalism, teamwork and diligence that shows in the projects that come forward for the Commission to consider. He also mentioned that a number of laws have been proposed and adopted by the state to help address the perceived housing crisis and yet at the conference it was pointed out by Deputy City Manager Matt Burris that depending upon how you count what is in the pipeline, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has somewhere in the neighborhood of 8,400 to over 10,000 housing units that have been approved over the last few years, and yet when we look at housing construction , it is lacking.    Page 190 HPC/PC Draft Minutes Page 6 of 6 2 8 3 1 He said there is a recent article out of a San Francisco publication that building permits in California, there was on average 250 building permits per 100,000 residents in 2023. He said if you look at what the City of Rancho Cucamonga is trying to push through, we are well ahead of that. By comparison nationwide that number is in the 400s, that is almost 500 building permits issued per 100,000 residents nationwide. Even after the state has adopted and pushed onto the cities so many pieces of legislation that sometimes tie their hands, as far as quality of product, they are still behind the national average, so something is broken, and that message came out numerous times at the conference. Commissioner Daniels asked staff if anything ever happened with the Commissioners letter that was going to the City Council. Principal Planner McPherson answered that it is still being discussed internally with staff and will get back to the Commission as soon as they get further clarification. G. Adjournment Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant Planning Department Approved:    Page 191 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW, MASTER PLAN, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PERTAINING TO A REQUEST FOR A PHASED REDEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTION FACILITY TO INCLUDE PRODUCTION, BOTTLING AND DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS ON APPROXIMATELY 30.1 ACRES IN THE MIXED EMPLOYMENT 2 (ME2) ZONE; APNS: 0209- 411-02, -03, -04, -23, -24, -32, -34, -35. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH No. 2023080369) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. A.Recitals. 1.Lone Oak -Rancho LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Design Review (DRC2023-00067), Master Plan (DRC2023-00072), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20713), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00068), and Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070), as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application." 2.On the 8th of October, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said applications recommending that the City Council approve the proposed project and concluded said hearing on that date recommending that the City Council approve the project as proposed. 3.On the 5th day of November, 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 5, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The project site consists of approximately 30.1 acres, generally located in the southern portion of Racho Cucamonga, bounded by Haven Avenue to the west, 7th Street to the north, Utica Avenue to the east, and 6 th Street to the south and comprising the following Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN: 0209-411-02, -03, -04, -23, -24, -32, -34, and -35);and ATTACHMENT 7   Page 192    Page 193    Page 194    Page 195    Page 196    Page 197    Page 198    Page 199 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 1 Draft August 25, 2025 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Revised September 24, 2025 1 OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION These Findings of Fact and this Statement of Overriding Considerations are made with respect to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)(SCH# 2023080369) for the El Camino Project (the “Project”) considered by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”) relating to the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project. The following Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations are required by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), California Public Resources Code Section 21081, 21081.5 and 21081.6, and Title 14, California Code of Regulations (the “CEQA Guidelines”) Sections 15091 through 15093, for the Project. This document provides the findings required by CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and the specific reasons for finding the Project acceptable notwithstanding that the Project results in significant adverse and unavoidable impacts that are infeasible to mitigate. Section 7 of this document addresses these unavoidable adverse impacts through a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) According to Section 15161 of the CEQA Guidelines, “the most common type of EIR examines the environmental impacts of a specific development project. This type of EIR should focus primarily on the changes in the environment that would result from the development project. The EIR shall examine all phases of the project including planning, construction, and operation.” This City Council concludes that the El Camino Project meets the definition of a project under CEQA so the El Camino Project EIR is a project -level EIR as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 and contains all the sections and information required in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 to 15132. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A private company, Lone Oak – Rancho LLC, is proposing to expand an existing beverage distribution facility. Existing development currently occupies the southern and northern portions of the site (approx. 17.9 acres) while the central portion (a former vineyard) occupies 12.2 acres of the site. The southern portion is developed with a beverage distribution facility and two office buildings. The northern portion of the site contains an existing 62,210-square foot warehouse on approximately 3 acres. The Project applicant is proposing to demolish up to 237,895 square feet of existing buildings and construct up to 1,054,541 square feet of new manufacturing, light industrial, and office uses on the Project site. Building heights will range from 34 to 130 feet and the Project will have a solar energy/battery storage system and a cogeneration system to help reduce energy consumption. The proposed Project includes two different development options. Phase 1 plus Phase 2A results in 783,741 net square feet of building area of non-residential uses (Industrial and Office), not including a new parking structure which does not generate vehicular trips or house employees. In contrast, Phase 1 plus Phase 2B results in 761,616 square feet of building area, or 22,125 less Exhibit A    Page 200 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 2 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga square feet than Phase 1 plus Phase 2A. The difference between the two options is that Phase 2A would reuse the existing 62,210 square-foot warehouse building while Phase 2B would demolish the existing warehouse building and construct a new 40,085 square f oot light industrial building. 2.1 – PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City or Lead Agency) has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed El Camino Project (“proposed Project” or “the Project”). The adoption and implementation of the Project is discretionary and defined as a “project” and is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.). Accordingly, the City has prepared this environmental impact report (EIR) to assess the short term, long term and cumulative environmental consequences that could result from adoption and implementation of the proposed Project. This report has been prepared in accordance with the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines and with the City’s local rules and procedures for implementing CEQA. It was prepared by professional planning consultants under contract to the City. The City is the Lead Agency for the preparation of this EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2023080369), as defined by CEQA (Public Resources Code, Section 21067, as amended), because it has primary discretionary authority with respect to the adoption and implementation of the proposed Project. The content of this document reflects the independent judgment of the City. The approach to the analysis presented in this EIR is at a project level because specific development information is available regarding the proposed Project. Each environmental issue is analyzed at a similar project level, starting with a discussion of the existing environmental setting, including physical conditions of the site and surrounding area, pertinent City General Plan goals, and policies and City Municipal Code requirements. Thresholds of significance are then defined and are used to measure the proposed Project’s potential impact to the environment. Thresholds of significance are based on a broad list of questions and impact topics set forth in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines and the typical CEQA thresholds used by the City. The impact analysis provided for each the 20 topical areas examines the specific short- and long- term environmental effects resulting from implementation of the proposed industrial development Project, including compliance with applicable General Plan goals and policies and City Municipal Code requirements. The assessment of impacts focuses on how the impact in question could occur and whether aspects of the proposed Project would reduce or ameliorate such impacts. The presence of sensitive environmental resources, hazards onsite or in the immediate area, and the broad implications of the General Plan relative to the proposed Project are considered in the determination of impact significance. If the analysis indicates that a significant impact could occur, then mitigation measures are specified. 2.2 – PROJECT LOCATION The 30.1-acre Project site is located in the southern area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in southwestern San Bernardino County. The Project site is bounded on all sides by public roadways: 7th Street to the north, Utica Avenue to the east, 6th Street to the south, and Haven Avenue to the west. The Project is located approximately 1.8 miles west of the I-15 Freeway and approximately 1.2 miles north of the I-10 Freeway. The Project site is comprised of eight contiguous Assessor Parcels (APNs 209-411-02, -03, -04, -23, -24, -32, -34, and -35).    Page 201 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 3 Revised September 24, 2025 2.3 – EXISTING CONDITIONS Regional Setting The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the nation's largest metropolitan planning organization (MPO), representing six counties, 191 cities and more than 19 million residents. SCAG is currently the MPO of six of the ten counties in Southern California, serving Imperial County, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Ventura County. The SCAG Regional Council adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), now called “Connect SoCal”, in September 2020. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS includes goals and policies applicable to transportation and land use projects. The City is within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) which is under South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) jurisdiction. The SoCAB includes portions of San Bernardino County, Los Angeles County, and Riverside County, and all of Orange County. The SCAQMD is the entity responsible for mitigating emissions from stationary, mobile and indirect sources. SCAQMD utilizes a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) that contain rules and regulations directed at attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The entire Southern California region contains many regional and local faults which results in the area being subject to moderate to high levels of groundshaking from earthquakes. The Project site is located in the Upper Santa Ana Valley Basin-Chino Subbasin and Chino Creek Watershed. Runoff out of the mountains to the north can result in areas of localized flooding during heavy storms. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within the western part of the San Bernardino Valley on a deep alluvial plain formed by runoff from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. The general area supported agriculture, mainly citrus and vineyards, since the late 1800’s but now it is largely urbanized. Past agricultural uses used hazardous chemicals in some locations for pesticides, fungicides, etc. The mountain foothills to the north and some of the drainages out of the foothills support native vegetation but much of the land has been covered over by development and supports mainly weedy invasive species and wildlife tolerant of human activity. The region has been occupied by Native Americans for thousands of years and grading activities sometimes yield historical and archaeological artifacts. Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is surrounded by land designated in the City’s General Plan as 21st Century Employment District. Existing land uses in this district include warehousing, commercial, vacant land, medical offices, hospitality uses, and other professional offices. A day care/pre-school is located near the southeast corner of the site, just east of Utica Ave. and just north of 6th Street.    Page 202 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 4 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Onsite Conditions The 30.1-acre Project site is developed with beverage distribution, warehousing, and offices totaling 270,800 square feet. According to the County Assessor’s Office website, t he Project site is located on eight contiguous parcels: Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 209-411-023, 209-411- 024, 209-411-032, 209-411-034, 209-411-035, 209-411-002, 209-411-003, and 209-411-004. At the time the NOP was issued, the southern three parcels (APNs 209-411-23, 209-411-24, 209- 411-34) contained a Distribution Center (DC) facility, two office buildings and support infrastructure with 208,590 square feet of space. The central two parcels (APNs 209-411-32, 209- 411-35) are currently vacant. The northern three parcels (APNs 209-411-02, 209-411-03, 209- 411-04) located along 7th Street are developed with an existing 62,210 square foot industrial warehouse (total existing building area is 270,800 SF). The Project site is generally flat and gently slopes from the northwest towards the southeast. Project site elevations range from approximately 1,091 feet above mean sea level (amsl) on the northwest corner down to 1,067 feet amsl on the southeast corner of the Project site with a total elevation difference of approximately 24 feet. The existing building pads and developed parcels have been graded and are generally flat. Ground surface cover of the vacant parcels consists of sparse to moderate native and non-native grasses and shrubs. The Project site is partially developed with warehouse and office buildings and is surrounded by other industrial and commercial land uses in all directions. The Project site has a General Plan designation of 21st Century Employment District and is within the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) zone. The Project will not require a general plan amendment or a change of zone. The site also has a former vineyard in the northern half of the Phase 1 property and the entire site has over 200 landscape trees throughout the site including along the north side of the former vineyard. Site History For the purposes of this discussion, the southern and central portions of the site (25.5 acres) constitute Phase 1 while the northeasterly portion (4.6 acres) of the site constitutes Phase 2. Phase 1 Site. The Project site supported agricultural uses in the past, including an orchard in the 1930s and grapevines in the southern and central portions of the site. The existing beverage distribution facility was developed in 1981-1982 in the southern portion of the site and currently supports a beverage distribution facility, but which once included the manufacturing and bottling of beverages, office uses, and drink distribution1. This facility now includes a warehouse, office, fleet service shop, 126 parking spaces, and landscaping. The main warehouse building was expanded in 1986 and again in 1998. The site of the existing beverage facility is a 9.1-acre parcel (APN 209-411-34). The existing beverage facility office and warehouse occupy a total of 160,020 square feet and has been in operation since its construction in 1981. The two existing office buildings in the southwest corner of the site were constructed in 1990 as a multi-tenant office development and are currently occupied by various office uses. In December 2022 the Project applicant acquired this part of the Project site. These offices occupy APNs 209-411-23 and 209- 411-24. At present there is no beverage production or bottling at the facility only warehousing and distribution activities. Phase 2 Site. The northeastern portion of the site contains the 7th Street warehouse building (i.e., Phase 2 property) which was developed in 1986 on the corner of Utica Avenue and 7th Street (APNs 209-411-02, 209-411-03, and 209-411-04). The 62,210-square foot warehouse was    Page 203 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 5 Revised September 24, 2025 originally developed as a three-unit concrete tilt-up complex constructed by General Dynamics. Since 1996, this building is currently occupied and has housed a series of unrelated industrial manufacturing uses in the past. 3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The Project is intended to implement the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan. The purpose of this Project is to implement the vision laid out in the Project objectives. The Project would generally increase the City’s production capacity and further fortify the economic base of the City. It would also revitalize a portion of the City with new and renovated industry and production. The Project is proposed to be developed to accomplish the following objectives: Objective 1: Facilitate the continued operation of the existing distribution facility with expanded operations and employment capacity. Objective 2: Redevelop an existing industrial site with modern and sustainable facilities, including large-scale buildings, intricate manufacturing processes, and large employment opportunities. Objective 3: Develop and operate an attractive state-of-the-art manufacturing and distribution facility in the City that meets industry standards to be competitive with similar facilities in the region. Objective 4: Maximize the efficiency of the existing operations during the expansion process by providing interim manufacturing steps within the same building envelope. Objective 5: Develop and operate a production and bottling facility that positively contributes to the local economy through new capital investment and the creation of new employment opportunities, including opportunities for highly trained workers. Objective 6: Develop an industrial and manufacturing facility that is in close proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, and other major transportation arterial roadways, to support the production of consumer goods and the distribution of manufactured goods throughout the region. Objective 7: Implement a microgrid energy production system via cogeneration at an existing manufacturing site to minimize manufacturing waste and to reduce the demand on existing public services and systems while employing carbon-reducing technologies and reduce the facility’s potential climate impact.    Page 204 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 6 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS 4.1 – LEAD AGENCY, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The entitlement process will require review and approval from the City’s Design Review Committee (DRC), the Planning Commission, and the City Council. Due to its size and scale, the Project must implement a Master Plan as an entitlement tool to adopt specific development standards for the Project that vary from the City codes but incorporate various community benefits in exchange for the identified deviations from the City Code requirements. The Project requires the following discretionary actions/approvals: • Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2023080369) • Master Plan (DRC2023-00072) - The Project site is presently zoned ME2 Mixed Employment designation with a Corridor Fronting Commercial and Retail Overlay along the Haven Avenue frontage. The Project Master Plan identifies specific exceptions to the zone development standards. It also includes building details, elevations, landscaping and fencing plans, and other design elements. It should be noted the RCMC requires this document and the City is not offering any discretionary reductions in zoning standards. • Design Review (DRC2023-00067) – The Design Review of the site plan and architectural design for the development of the bottling and distribution facility. The Project is being developed in two Phases which are evaluated in the EIR for potential impacts (Phase 1 and Phase 2). A new Design Review or Minor Design Review application will be required by the City for approval once plans for Phase 2 are completed. The City will review Phase 2 plans for consistency with the environmental analysis of the potential environmental impacts for Phase 2 included in this EIR. This applies to both Phase 2A (reuse of the existing building) as well as Phase 2B (demolition of the existing building and construction of a new building). • Conditional Use Permit (DRC-2023-00068) – The Project will operate a “Manufacturing, Light- Large” land use as defined in the City’s zoning ordinance and continue operations of “Wholesale and Distribution, Medium” land use in the Mixed Employment 2 (ME2) District. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Wholesale and Distribution has been included for the Project since this use is no longer permitted in the ME2 zone per the City’s updated development standards. Impacts associated with the Project and the CUP (including 1,000 square feet of cold storage space) will be analyzed in the EIR and evaluated in the technical studies. • Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (original SUB TPM20713 to VTPM20713) – The proposed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (VTPM) would include a request to consolidate the eight existing parcels and create three new parcels for the Project. The VTPM would create the following three lots: Parcel 1 would be approximately 25.39 acres in size for the new industrial buildings, parking structure and office building; Parcel 2 would be 0.68 acres and would provide a new access from 7th Street to the Project site; and Parcel 3 would be 3.88 acres and would encompass the existing 7th Street warehouse building and parking area. Additionally, three lettered lots would be created for access. • Tentative Parcel Map (SUB TPM20713) – The proposed Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) would include a request to consolidate the eight existing parcels and create three new parcels for the Project. The TPM would create the following three lots: Parcel 1 would be approximately 25.39 acres in size for the new industrial buildings, parking structure and office building; Parcel 2 would be 0.68 acres and would provide a new access from 7th Street to the Project site; and Parcel 3 would be 3.88 acres and would encompass the existing 7th Street warehouse building and parking area. Additionally, three lettered lots would be created for access.    Page 205 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 7 Revised September 24, 2025 • Uniform Sign Program (DRC 2023-00069) - The proposed Project includes the review of a Uniform Sign Program which governs the design and construction of all planned and future signs. • Tree Removal Permit (DRC2023-00070) –The Project proposes the removal of a number of trees that require the submittal of a removal permit as the identified trees meet the intent of Section 17.80 of the City’s Development Code. 4.2 – OTHER AGENCIES Federal Agencies • None State and Regional Agencies • State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water for approval of a domestic water supply permit amendment of a new source and possible treatment changes (Cal. Code Regs. § 64556) • South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) – Permits for individual pieces of equipment as appropriate. • South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) – Rule 2305 – New Warehouses • Cucamonga Valley Water District (new water well permits for construction and operation) • Connection permits and approvals by various regional utility providers Local Agencies • Connection permits and approvals by various local utility providers 5 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, the Record of Proceedings for the Project consists, without limitation, of the following documents: • Two Notices of Preparation (“NOP”) and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Project; in this case dated August 17, 2023 and September 14, 2023; • All comments submitted by public agencies or members of the public during the two (2) 30-day public comment period for the first NOP that began on August 17, 2023 and ran through September 15, 2023 and the second NOP period that began on September 14, 2023 and ran through October 13, 2023; • The El Camino Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (sometimes referred to herein as the “DEIR,”) dated April 25, 2025; • All comments submitted by public agencies or members of the public during the 45-day public comment period for the DEIR that began on April 29, 2025, and ended on June 13, 2025;    Page 206 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 8 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga • The El Camino Project Final Environmental Impact Report (including Response to Comments), dated September 18, 2025; • The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project which is included as Section 4.0 of the FEIR; • All findings and resolutions adopted by City decision-makers in connection with the Project, and all documents cited or referred to therein; • All reports, studies, memoranda, staff reports, maps, exhibits, illustrations, diagrams or other planning materials relating to the Project prepared by the City, or by consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies that were submitted to the City with respect to the City’s compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City’s actions on the Project; • All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the Project; • Minutes, as available, of all public meetings and public hearings held by the City in connection with the Project; • Any documentary or other evidence submitted to the City at such information sessions, public meetings, and public hearings; • Matters of common knowledge within the City, including, but not limited to those cited above; and • Any other materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The City Council has relied on all of the documents listed above in reaching its decision on the Project. The Draft EIR, Final EIR, and administrative record for the El Camino Project are available for review upon request at: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730    Page 207 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 9 Revised September 24, 2025 6 FINDINGS OF FACT Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, no public agency shall approve or carry out a project where an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) has been certified that identifies one or more significant impacts on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless the public agency makes one or more findings for each of those significant impacts, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale of each finding. The possible findings, which must be supported by substantial evidence in the record, are: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects on the environment. (2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. With respect to significant effects which were subject to finding (3) above, the public agency must find that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment. References for discussion of environmental impacts within the Final EIR are noted with each finding. Impact numbers refer to the section number and the threshold letter referenced in the Draft EIR where the full discussion of impacts is included. The Findings of Fact are presented on the following pages. A. Effects Determined to Have No Impact or a Less than Significant Impact The evaluation prepared in the El Camino Project EIR found and provided substantial evidence that certain environmental issues related to the El Camino Project would have no impact or have impacts that are less than significant. The City Council agrees with the characterization of the FEIR with respect to all of the El Camino Project impacts identified as resulting in “no impact” or “less than significant” impacts and finds that those impacts have been described and analyzed accurately and are supported by substantial evidence as described in the FEIR, including the Draft EIR. Reference should be made to the DEIR and FEIR for a more complete description of the findings regarding these impacts. This finding applies to the evaluation of the potential impacts for the following items, as further described in the DEIR, that the project will either have no impact or a less than significant impact.    Page 208 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 10 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Aesthetics • AES-1: Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. • AES-2: Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. • AES-3: Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site/planning area or its surroundings. • AES-4: Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime. • AES-5: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to aesthetics. Agricultural Resources • AG-1: Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. • AG-2: Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. • AG-3: Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220 (g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g)). • AG-4: Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. • AG-5: Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. • AG-6: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to Agriculture and Forestry Resources. Air Quality • AIR-3: Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • AIR-4: Result in other emissions such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Biological Resources • BIO-2: Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.    Page 209 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 11 Revised September 24, 2025 • BIO-3: Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. • BIO-5: Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. • BIO-6: Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. • BIO-7: Cause substantial adverse impacts with respect to biological resources. Cultural Resources • CUL-1: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. • CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5. • CUL-3: Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries. • CUL-4: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to cultural resources. Energy • ENG-1: Significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. • ENG-2: Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. • ENG-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to energy.    Page 210 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 12 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Geology and Soils • GEO-1: Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: o Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. (Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42) o Strong seismic ground shaking. o Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. o Landslides. • GEO-2: Result in substantial soil erosion of the loss of topsoil. • GEO-3: Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in an on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. • GEO-4: Be located on expansive soil, as defined by Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property. • GEO-5: Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. • GEO-6: Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature. • GEO-7: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to geology and soils, including paleontological resources. Greenhouse Gases • GHG-2: Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials • HAZMAT-1: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. • HAZMAT-3: Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.    Page 211 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 13 Revised September 24, 2025 • HAZMAT-4: Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. • HAZMAT-6: Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. • HAZMAT-7: Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. • HAZMAT-8: Cause substantial cumulative impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. Hydrology and Water Quality • HYD-1: Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. • HYD-2: Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. • HYD-3: Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would; (a) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; (b) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or offsite; (c) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; (d) provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or (e) impede or redirect flood flows. • HYD-4: In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. • HYD-5: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. • HYD-6: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to hydrology and water quality. Land Use and Planning • LAND-1: Physically divide an established community; • LAND-2: Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. • LAND-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to land use and planning.    Page 212 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 14 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Mineral Resources • MIN-1: Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. • MIN-2: Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land-use plan. • MIN-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to mineral resources. Noise • NOISE-2: Would the project result in generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The EIR found that within this impact category, less than significant impacts without mitigation were found for: (1) increase in onsite noise levels (Phase 1 Office and Parking Facilities and Phase 2A/2B 7th Street Warehouse Facility); (2) increase in onsite noise levels (CVWD Well Facility); and (3) increase in offsite traffic noise levels. • NOISE-3: Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels. The EIR found that within this impact category, less than significant impacts without mitigation were found for: (1) temporary construction vibration levels; and (2) operational vibration levels. • NOISE-4: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels. • NOISE-5: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to noise or vibration. Population and Housing • POP-1: Induce substantial unplanned population growth either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure). • POP-2: Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. • POP-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to population and housing.    Page 213 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 15 Revised September 24, 2025 Public Services • PS-1: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: o Fire protection o Police protection o Schools o Parks o Other public facilities. • PS-2: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to public services. Recreation • REC-1: Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. • REC-2: Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. • REC-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to parks and recreation facilities. Transportation • TRANS-1: Conflict with program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • TRANS-3: Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). • TRANS-4: Result in inadequate emergency access. Tribal Cultural Resources • TCR-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to tribal cultural resources.    Page 214 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 16 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Utilities and Service Systems • UTS-1: Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. • UTS-2: Have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. • UTS-3: Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. • UTS-4: Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. • UTS-5: Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. • UTS-6 Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to Utilities and Service Systems. Wildfire • WIL-1: Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuated plan. • WIL-2: Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. • WIL-3: Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure such as roads fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. • WIL-4: Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes Sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • WIL-5: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to wildfire. In addition, the EIR determined that potential impacts with respect to growth-inducing effects and irreversible environmental changes would be less than significant.    Page 215 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 17 Revised September 24, 2025 B. Impacts Determined to Be Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Final EIR (including the Draft EIR) identifies the following significant environmental impacts associated with the Project. Based on the environmental analysis of the Project and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1) that “changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigates or avoid the significant effects on the environment.” The descriptions of the impacts in these findings are summary statements. Mitigation Measures are numbered to correspond to listings in the Draft EIR and Final EIR. Reference should be made to the Draft EIR and Final EIR for a more complete description. AIR QUALITY IMPACT AIR-1: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the South Coast Air Quality Management District 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. The EIR found that within this impact category, regional construction emissions were found to be potentially significant for VOCs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) and NOx (Phase 1 only) and thus would conflict with the 2022 AQMP. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.3.5 of the DEIR states the proposed Project is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the AQMP is affirmed if the Project: (1) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP; and (2) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new one. Consistency Criterion 1 refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the AQMP. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. The proposed Project is estimated to create approximately 289 net new jobs. This value is within the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS growth projection for the City of Rancho Cucamonga of 420 jobs per year, which is an average rate across almost three decades (2016 to 2045). The employment growth associated with the Project (net 289 jobs) represents less than 2% of the anticipated total employment growth in the City between 2016 and 2045 (16,800 jobs). Therefore, the proposed Project would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP. Consistency Criterion 2 refers to AQMP control measures intended to achieve attainment of ambient air quality standards in the South Coast Air Basin. The Project would comply with SCAQMD rules developed as part of the AQMP; however, as described under Impact AIR-2, the proposed Project’s mitigated emissions levels are anticipated to exceed SCAQMD NOX emissions thresholds during Phase 1 and Phase 2 operations and during combined Phase 1 operations and Phase 2B construction. This increase in emissions above recommended thresholds could result in new and/or more frequent or more severe exceedances of regional air quality standards. As such, the proposed Project is determined to have the potential to conflict with the SCAQMD 2022 AQMP due to exceedances of the SCAQMD NOx daily significance threshold even after mitigation. This impact would be significant and unavoidable even with recommended mitigation measures MM-AIR-2A and MM-AIR-2B shown below (DEIR pages 4.3-49 to 4.3-50).    Page 216 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 18 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential VOC and NOx emissions during project construction: MM-AIR-2A: Reduce Construction VOC Emissions. To reduce construction-related emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the City shall require the applicant to implement the following measures during all Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction activities: 1) Use architectural coatings that meet the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) “Super Compliant” VOC standard of 10 grams/liter or less for all interior and exterior primer, sealer, paint, and other coating applications for which a super compliant product is commercially available. a) If feasible given contract, logistical, and other construction factors, avoid painting during peak smog season (July, August, and September) if super compliant coatings are not commercially available. 2) Keep all coating containers closed when not in use to prevent VOC emissions. 3) Keep all paint and solvent laden rags and other materials in sealed containers to prevent VOC emissions. 4) Clean up water-based paints with water only and when possible do not rinse clean-up water down the drain, onto the ground, or into a storm drain. 5) Use SCAQMD compliant Clean Air Solvents to clean paint application equipment. 6) Recycle leftover paint. MM-AIR-2B: Reduce Construction NOx and PM Exhaust Emissions. To reduce construction- related exhaust emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), including diesel particulate matter (DPM), the City shall require the applicant to implement the following measures during all Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction activities: 1) Connect to existing electrical service to power construction trailers and stationary and portable equipment (e.g., pumps, generators, compressors, and welding sets). This measure shall be subject to the approval of the local electric utility. If it is not feasible to connect to electrical service and/or extend electrical service to all work sites, biodiesel (no more than B20 blend), renewable diesel, or propane shall be used to power stationary and portable equipment provided the use of such fuels is allowed pursuant to manufacturer’s specifications. The use of stationary or portable diesel-fueled equipment shall be prohibited in the project area unless electrical service is denied, alternative fuels are not permitted by the manufacturer for the specific equipment in use, and there are no alternative equipment types capable of being powered by alternative fuels that can be used instead of the standard diesel-fueled equipment. 2) All construction equipment with a rated power-output of 50 horsepower (hp) or greater shall be certified to meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 Final nonroad diesel engine emissions standards for NOX and PM10, or be retrofitted with California Air Resources Board (CARB)-verified diesel emissions control strategies capable of reducing exhaust NOX and PM10 emissions to levels that meet Tier 4 Final emissions standards, unless the applicant submits evidence to the City that specific equipment meeting this requirement is not available on loan, rent, or other terms of use within 200 miles of the City. In this instance, the next highest available emissions tier (e.g., Tier 4 Interim, Tier 3) for the specific equipment in question shall be required.    Page 217 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 19 Revised September 24, 2025 3) Limit idling of diesel-powered construction equipment, vendor delivery trucks, and hauling trucks to no more than two minutes unless manufacturer’s specifications specifically require main engine idling is necessary to maintain equipment in good working order. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-AIR-2A and MM-AIR-2B, the Project would have less than significant impacts for regional construction emissions of VOCs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) and NOx (Phase 1 only) and thus would be consistent with the 2022 AQMP (DEIR page 4.3-51) IMPACT AIR-2: Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutants for which the South Coast Air Basin is designated non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The EIR found that within this impact category, regional construction emissions were found to be potentially significant for VOCs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) and NOx (Phase 1 only). Substantial Evidence: Section 4.3.5 of the DEIR states the Phase 1 regional construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended threshold for CO, SO2, PM10, or PM2.5, but would exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended threshold for VOCs and NOX, both of which are precursors to O3. SCAQMD’s regional criteria air pollutant threshold for VOC is 75 pounds per day and the threshold for NOX is 100 pounds per day. The Project’s construction emissions would exceed SCAQMD- recommended regional thresholds for VOCs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) and NO X (Phase 1 only), both of which are precursors to ozone (O3, a pollutant for which the region is designated nonattainment). This is considered a potentially significant impact. Accordingly, the City shall require the applicant to implement Mitigation Measure AIR-2A, Reduce Construction VOC Emissions, and Mitigation Measure AIR-2B, Reduce Construction NOX and PM Exhaust Emissions), which would limit the VOC content in the coatings used during construction and require construction equipment to meet stringent U.S. EPA / CARB Tier IV Final emissions standards. These measures would lower maximum daily VOC and NOX emissions by approximately 67% and 58%, respectively. Mitigation Measures AIR-2A and AIR-2B would reduce the Project’s maximum daily regional NOx emissions to levels below the SCAQMD’s thresholds. This impact would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages 4.3-52 to 4.3-53). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential VOC and NOx emissions during project construction: MM-AIR-2A: Reduce Construction VOC Emissions. See Impact AIR-1 above. MM-AIR-2B: Reduce Construction NOx and PM Exhaust Emissions. See Impact AIR-1 above. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-AIR-2A and MM-AIR-2B, the Project would have less than significant impacts for regional construction emissions of VOCs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) and NOx (Phase 1 only)(DEIR page 4.3-53).    Page 218 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 20 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IMPACT BIO-1: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.4.4 of the DEIR states that no special-status plant species were observed during field investigations conducted at the Project site, so no impacts would occur to these species. Additionally, no special-status wildlife species were observed onsite during field investigations, and it was determined the Project site does not have the potential to support special-status wildlife species that would occur in the area. While not federally- or state-listed as endangered or threatened, the BRA determined the Project site has the potential to support Cooper’s hawk, Costa’s hummingbird, and California horned lark, as well as burrowing owl. A pre-construction nesting bird clearance survey is recommended prior to Project clearing and grading and is included as Mitigation Measure BIO-1. With implementation of the recommended mitigation, impacts to special-status wildlife species will be less than significant. Based on the results of the 2023 burrowing owl focused survey, no burrowing owls or evidence of recent or historic use by burrowing owls were observed on the Project site. As a result, burrowing owls are presumed to be absent from the Project site. However, this species can rapidly occupy a vacant site by taking over small mammal burrows. To ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the Project site, the BRA and BFS recommended that a pre-construction clearance survey be conducted in accordance with CDFWs 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation prior to any ground disturbing activities, as is outlined in Mitigation Measure BIO-2. If burrowing owls are determined to remain absent from the Project site during the pre-construction clearance survey, no further review will be needed. If burrowing owls are found to occupy the Project site during the pre-construction clearance survey, a burrowing owl relocation plan will be prepared and need to be approved by CDFW prior to construction activities. With implementation of the recommended mitigation, impacts either directly or through habitat modifications, on candidate, sensitive, or special status species would be reduced to less than significant levels (DEIR page 4.4-12). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts to nesting birds and burrowing owl prior to grading: MM-BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey. Bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through August 31 in southern California. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special-status) during the nesting season, a qualified avian biologist will conduct a pre‐construction nesting bird survey three (3) days prior to project‐related disturbance to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no‐work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage and expected types, intensity and duration of disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no‐work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Community Development Director.    Page 219 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 21 Revised September 24, 2025 MM-BIO-2: Burrowing Owl Survey. A pre-construction clearance survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation3 (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2012) prior to ground disturbance to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. If burrowing owls are found to occupy the project site during the pre-construction clearance survey, a burrowing owl relocation plan will need to be prepared and approved by CDFW prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activities. The burrowing owl relocation plan shall outline recommended methods proposed to relocate the burrowing owls from the project site and provide measures that will be implemented for the maintenance, monitoring, and reporting of the relocated burrowing owls to increase chances of survivorship and better ensure compliance with CDFW guidelines. This plan should be implemented during the non-breeding season, and prior to seasonal rains to promote the best outcome for conservation of the burrowing owl. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Community Development Director. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1 and MM-BIO-2 prior to grading, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or state/federal regulatory agencies (DEIR page 4.4-13). IMPACT BIO-4: Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.4.4 of the DEIR states that implementation of the proposed Project is not expected to have a significant impact to wildlife movement opportunities or prevent local wildlife movement through the area. The Project site is separated from regional wildlife corridors and linkages by existing development, and there are no riparian corridors or creeks connecting the Project site to these areas. The Project site is also not within any existing connectivity areas or wildlife linkages identified in Figure 5.4-6, Wildlife Movement Linkages Map, of the City General Plan4. Therefore, the Project site does not function as a major wildlife movement corridor or linkage. Due to the lack of any identified impacts to wildlife movement, migratory corridors or linkages or native wildlife nurseries, there are no impacts and no mitigation is required. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald/Golden Eagle Protection Act prohibit impacts to native resident or migratory wildlife (i.e., birds and raptors) and this issue was largely addressed in Impact BIO-1 relative to listed or sensitive birds that may utilize or reside on the site. That section determined those impacts were potentially significant and recommended Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 to conduct surveys for nesting birds and burrowing owl on the site just prior to the start of ground disturbance to prevent impacts to those species. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2, the Project will have less than significant impacts relative to migratory species or wildlife corridors under either the Phase 1 plus Phase 2A scenario or under the Phase 1 plus Phase 2B scenario (DEIR page 4.4-15). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts to nesting birds and burrowing owl prior to grading:    Page 220 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 22 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga MM-BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey. See Impact BIO-1 above MM-BIO-2: Burrowing Owl Survey. See Impact BIO-1 above Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1 and MM-BIO-2, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites (DEIR page 4.4-15). HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IMPACT HAZMAT-2: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.9.4 of the DEIR stated that three of the recent Phase I/II ESA documents did not identify any areas of existing contamination on their portions of the Project site (i.e., the two existing office buildings and the vacant property just north of the existing two offices). However, the 2017 Ramboll ESA indicates the existing beverage distribution facility has had a long-documented history involving the storage and use of hazardous materials. Based on available information, the EIR concluded it was at least possible that there may be unanticipated buried materials onsite from construction or operation of past and present onsite uses (i.e., orchard, vineyard, farmhouse, and existing beverage distribution facility). Therefore, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 was recommended to assure that any unanticipated hazardous materials that are found during grading will be identified and properly remediated in a safe and effective manner (DEIR page 4.9-13). According to the SCAQMD, demolition of older buildings and structures may pose a hazard regarding asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint. It should be noted that Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) and lead based paint (LBP) do not represent a significant public health hazard when they are left undisturbed, however, site development requires demolition of the existing office and warehouse buildings prior to grading. Due to the age of the existing onsite building, the EIR recommended a survey prior to any demolition on the site to determine if or to what degree the existing buildings contain ACMs and/or LBP. In this regard, Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 is recommended to be implemented prior to any demolition activities (DEIR page 4.9-15). According to the State Water Resources Control Board, there are no leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup sites or disposal sites within the Project site (DEIR page 4.9-15). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts from accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. MM-HAZ-1: Unanticipated Discovery of Hazardous Materials. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Phase 1 and/or Phase 2, the project proponent shall retain a qualified environmental professional (QEP) experienced with remediating hazardous materials from infill urban    Page 221 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 23 Revised September 24, 2025 construction sites. The QEP must be on-call and summoned to the site immediately if any potentially hazardous materials are found during grading. Grading must be halted within 100 feet of an area that appears to contain hazardous materials. The QEP will halt grading as necessary to effectively identify the potential contaminated materials, including directing any sampling and laboratory testing that may be required. If soils are found to be contaminated at levels that are only slightly in excess of applicable residential standards, the QEP shall exercise professional discretion and have the option to coordinate with the grading contractor and developer to either remove contaminated soil and/or mix the contaminated soil with clean soil from either onsite or offsite to dilute any contaminants to below applicable exposure standards for residential development. Remediated areas must be retested to assure potential contaminant levels are below applicable residential standards. The results of any testing shall be provided to the City or other agencies as appropriate. Any contaminated soil that must be removed from the site shall be done by a licensed contractor and hauled to a landfill approved for such materials. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Community Development Department. MM-HAZ-2: ACMs and LBP Survey. Prior to demolition of any structures on the project site in either Phase 1 or 2, the developer shall retain qualified licensed environmental contractor(s) to survey the existing onsite office and warehouse buildings and any related structures for asbestos- containing materials (ACMs) and Lead-Based Paints (LBPs). If the survey finds the presence of any ACMs or LBPs on the site, the contractor(s) shall follow all relevant guidance from affected regulatory agencies (e.g., CalEPA, SCAQMD, DTSC, County Health Department, etc.) in terms of safe removal and disposal of the contaminated materials as appropriate. The contractor(s) shall prepare and submit a final report to the City Community Development Department within 30 days after completion of demolition/removal for ACMs and LBPs on the project site. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-HAZ-1 and MM-HAZ-2, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment (DEIR page 4.9-16). IMPACT HAZMAT-5: For projects located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.9.4 of the DEIR states that the Project site is located 1.95 miles north of the airport. San Bernardino County has delegated each airport proprietor to create individual Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans, rather than establish an Airport Land Use Commission. The Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP) serves to promote safe compatibility between the airport and the surrounding land uses. As stated previously, the site is zoned as Mixed Employment 2 (ME2), allowing for medium to high intensity professional office or industrial/manufacturing spaces. The Project involves the demolition and new construction of the existing onsite beverage facility to allow for the new production, bottling, and expanded distribution of beverage products. The surrounding land uses of the Project site all include    Page 222 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 24 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga commercial and industrial developments, and development of the proposed Project will be in compliance with the City’s applicable land use designations and zoning. The Project site will be developed and operated in cooperation with the ONT ALUCP and will not encroach on airport property. The Project site is outside of the ONT Safety Zones and ALUCP noise contour maps and will not expose persons residing or working in the Project area to excessive airport safety hazards or noise. Map 2-4, Compatibility Policy Map, Airspace Protection Zones, in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (OIA LUCP) indicates the majority of the Project site is within the maximum 70 foot building height in the High Terrain Zone and a portion of the site is within the maximum 70 foot - 100 foot building height area. The Project proposes several tall buildings on the site (i.e., ASRS is maximum 130 feet and 70 feet average, PC building is maximum 41 feet, and DC is maximum 45 feet). These buildings are approximately 10,000 feet north-northeast of the closest ONT runway. Therefore, the Project will need to obtain clearance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and comply with its lighting/signage restrictions and warning improvements. These potential restrictions are addressed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-3 below. The Project applicant initiated and concluded consultation with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) Group on January 26, 2024, to determine whether the construction or operation of the Project would affect the National Airspace System (NAS). The Project applicant provided site plan, building elevation, and topographical information to the FAA for their review through the FAA OE/AAA online portal. Email and telephone communication continued through June 11, 2024. The FAA determined that the main building structure would create no hazard on the NAS on April 4, 2024, and conditioned requirements such as no strobe lighting with which the Project will comply as required by MM-HAZ 3 listed below. The Project would require the use of a crane during its construction, which the FAA determined on June 11, 2024, that the crane, as a temporary structure, would have no hazard on the NAS. As a result, the construction and operation of the Project would not create a hazard on the NAS and a less than significant impact would occur with the implementation of the required lighting restrictions as conditioned by the FAA. As noted in the existing conditions of the PlanRC General Plan Update, the southern border of the City is located approximately one mile north of the Ontario Airport’s 65 dBA CNEL noise contour, and as such, aircraft noise does not significantly impact persons on the site. The proposed Project will adhere to all noise and safety policies as established in the Noise Element of PlanRC, as well as those policies outlined in the ONT ALUCP. With this regulatory compliance, potential impacts related to airport hazards will be less than significant and no mitigation is required (DEIR pages 4.9-19 to 4.9-20). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts related to proximity to airports:    Page 223 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 25 Revised September 24, 2025 MM-HAZ-3: FAA Lighting Hazards. A minimum of 45 days prior to submittal of an application for a building permit for the project, the applicant shall consult with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department in order to demonstrate the Project is consistent with FAA lighting or other restrictions or prohibitions which may include but are not limited to the following: a. Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. b. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. c. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. d. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. e. All retention and water quality basins shall be designed to dewater within 48 hours of a rainfall event. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-HAZ-3, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to proximity to airports (DEIR page 4.9-20). NOISE IMPACT NOISE-1: Would the project generate a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Substantial Evidence: Section 4.13.4 of the DEIR states the proposed Project’s potential construction noise impacts were estimated using the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), Version 1.1, and guidance for conducting general, quantitative construction noise assessments contained in the FTA’s Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Construction activities from Phase 1 and Phase 2B could exceed the City’s 70 dBA construction noise standard for commercial land uses established by Development Code Section 17.66.050. To reduce construction noise levels, the City shall require the applicant to implement Mitigation Measure NOI-1, which would restrict work hours to periods when humans are less sensitive to elevated noise levels in accordance with Development Code requirements, implement construction staging and equipment noise control measures, and require installation of a temporary noise barrier between work areas and affected properties. The implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce construction noise levels by 5 dBA to 7 dBA at individual receptor locations during the daytime, with the greatest reductions occurring at R07 due to a greater barrier height next to the well site than at other locations. The implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would avoid the potential for Project construction noise levels to exceed development code standards (DC Section 17.66.050) which would result in a substantial temporary increase in noise levels and, therefore, results in potential Project construction noise levels that are less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages 4.13-31 to 4.13-34).    Page 224 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 26 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga The EIR recommended the following mitigation measure to help reduce potential impacts related to construction noise (i.e., substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in excess of local standards): MM-NOI-1: Reduce Noise Construction Levels. To reduce potential construction noise to levels that are consistent with the City’s 70 dBA Leq standard for commercial land uses, the City shall require the applicant and/or its designated contractor, contractor’s representatives, or other appropriate personnel to implement the following measures during construction activities: 1. Restrict Work Hours. All construction-related work activities, including material deliveries, shall be subject to the requirements of Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(D)(4). Construction activities, including deliveries, shall only occur during the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM on weekdays and Saturday, and shall not occur on Sunday. The applicant and/or its contractor shall post a sign at all entrances to the construction site informing contractors, subcontractors, construction workers, etc. of this requirement. 2. Construction Staging and Equipment Noise Control Measures. a) Construction site access and staging activities such as receipt of deliveries, equipment and material storage, etc., shall occur as far away as possible from occupied parts of land uses (e.g., buildings, outdoor areas) adjacent to the Project site given site and active work constraints. b) All stationary noise generating equipment shall be shielded and located as far as possible from adjacent land uses given site and active work constraints. Shielding may consist of trailers, stored materials, or a three- or four-sided enclosure provided the structure/barrier breaks the line of sight between the equipment and the receptor, provides for proper equipment ventilation and operations, and complies with all other applicable occupational safety and health requirements. c) Heavy equipment shall include standard noise suppression devices such as mufflers, engine covers, and engine/mechanical isolators, mounts, etc. Equipment and noise suppression devices shall be maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations while on-site. d) Pneumatic tools shall include a suppression device on the compressed air exhaust. e) Connect to existing electrical service to power stationary and portable equipment (e.g., pumps, generators, compressors, and welding sets). This measure shall be subject to the approval of the local electric utility. 3. Construction Activity Noise Control Measures: a) Demolition Sequencing: Demolition/deconstruction activities shall be sequenced to take advantage of existing shielding/noise reduction provided by existing buildings, parts of buildings, and/or other structures (e.g., construction trailers), and shall use methods that minimize noise and vibration, such as sawing concrete blocks instead of crushing or other pulverization activities, unless there are project-specific technical and logistical constraints that require such activities. b) Install Phase 1 Construction Noise Barrier. During all Phase 1 demolition, site preparation, grading, structure foundation work (e.g., excavation, pad pour, etc.), paving, and well    Page 225 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 27 Revised September 24, 2025 drilling activities, the applicant shall install and maintain a physical noise barrier along the portion of the southeast perimeter of the site from 6th Street north (i.e., adjacent to Utica Avenue) a distance of 500 feet. The barrier shall be installed at-grade (or mounted to structures located at-grade, such as a K-rail) and extend to a height of at least six (6) feet above grade, except adjacent to the well drilling area, where the barrier shall extend to a height of 10 feet above grade, and shall consist of a solid material that is free of openings or gaps (other than weep holes) and that has a minimum rated transmission loss value of 25 dB adjacent to the well drilling area and 20 dB in all other areas. Potential materials that are capable of achieving required noise level reductions include nominal 0.5-inch plywood (20 dB), nominal 0.75-inch plywood (25 dB), commercially available acoustic panels, blankets, or other products, or any combination of noise barriers and commercial products that achieve a minimum transmission loss value of 20 dB or 25 dB as required. The barrier may be removed following the completion of all Phase 1 demolition, site preparation and grading, structure foundation, paving, and well drilling within the 7-acre southeast quadrant shown in EIR Exhibit 4.13-3. c) Install Phase 2B Construction Noise Barrier. During all Phase 2B demolition, site preparation, grading, structure foundation (e.g., excavation, pad pour, etc.), and paving work, the applicant shall install and maintain a physical noise barrier along the Phase 2B northern, eastern, and western boundary. The noise barrier shall be installed at-grade (or mounted to structures located at-grade, such as a K-rail) and shall extend to a height of at least six (6) feet above grade. The noise barrier shall consist of a solid material that is free of openings or gaps (other than weep holes) and has a minimum rated transmission loss value of 20 dB. Potential materials that are capable of achieving required noise level reductions include nominal 0.5-inch plywood (20 dB), commercially available acoustic panels, blankets, or other products, or any combination of noise barriers and commercial products that achieve a minimum transmission loss value of 20 dB. The barrier may be removed following the completion of all Phase 2B demolition, site preparation and grading, structure foundation, and paving work. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-1, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to construction noise (DEIR page 4.13-37). IMPACT NOISE-2: Would the project generate a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Substantial Evidence: As described in DEIR Section 4.13.5, the DEIR estimated the proposed Project’s potential on- and off-site operational noise levels using empirical equipment noise measurements from a similar beverage facility (the Downey PC/DC), manufacturer’s specifications, Project-specific development assumptions regarding the location of equipment, trip generation, etc., and the FHWA Traffic Noise Model. DEIR Section 4.13.5 indicates the increase in onsite noise levels from Phase 1 PC, DC, and ASRS and Phase 2 cogeneration facilities could be potentially significant and require mitigation) (DEIR pages 4.13-37 to 4.13-46). The analysis made the following specific determinations:    Page 226 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 28 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga (a) increases in onsite noise levels from Phase 1 PC, DC, and ASRS and Phase 2 cogeneration facilities would be potentially significant due to an increase in ambient noise levels in excess of the standards established in Development Code Section 17.66.110. However, these levels are reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2 (see below); (b) Increases in onsite noise levels from Phase 1 office and parking facilities and Phase 2A/2B 7th Street warehouse facility would be less than significant; (c) increases in onsite noise levels (backup generator) would be potentially significant by increasing ambient noise levels in excess of the standards established in Development Code Section 17.66.110. With implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2 (see below), impacts will be reduced to less than significant level; (d) increases in onsite noise levels from new CVWD well would be less than significant; and (e) increases in off-site traffic noise levels from Project traffic will be less than significant. The EIR recommended the following mitigation measure to help reduce potential impacts related to operational noise (i.e., substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of local standards): MM-NOI-2: Noise Verification Study. Prior to the issuance of any Phase 1 or Phase 2 grading permit for the project, the City shall review and approve a final noise analysis, prepared by or on behalf of the applicant, and based on the final project design, that: 1) Identifies the locations of the project’s final exterior stationary equipment, including backup generators, and truck dock areas and any screening walls; and 2) Demonstrates the project’s noise levels will not exceed the City’s applicable industrial noise standards (as outlined in Development Code Section 17.66.110). The final analysis shall contain specific and verifiable information pertaining to the project’s final site design and layout and equipment noise levels (e.g., manufacturer’s specifications, empirical noise measurements). The analysis may be prepared for Phase 1, Phase 2, or combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 activities if final information is available. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to operational noise and not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of local standards (DEIR page 4.13-46).    Page 227 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 29 Revised September 24, 2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT TRANS-2: Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA guidelines section 15064.3(b) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Substantial Evidence: DEIR Section 4.17.4 states that a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Study was prepared for the Project consistent with the requirements of California Senate Bill 743 and the City’s transportation report preparation guidelines. The EIR found the proposed Project did not satisfy any of the City- established screening thresholds so a quantitative VMT analysis was prepared using the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) in accordance with the City’s guidelines. The cumulative Project-generated VMT per employee of 16.9 does not exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Buildout VMT per employee of 17.0 so the proposed Project is forecast to result in a less than significant VMT impact based on the City-established threshold for cumulative Project-generated VMT. However, baseline project-generated VMT per employee of 18.3 exceeds the City-established threshold of 17.4 VMT per employee. To reduce the baseline project-generated VMT to a less than significant level, baseline project-generated VMT must be reduced by 0.9 VMT per employee, or approximately 4.9 percent. The VMT Study therefore recommended Mitigation Measure TRA-1 to reduce project VMT below the City’s adopted standard. With implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1, Project VMT impacts would be less than significant under either the Phase 1 plus Phase 2A scenario or the Phase 1 plus Phase 2B scenario (DEIR pages 4.17-19 to 4.17-23). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measure to help reduce potential impacts related to Project VMT to less than significant levels: MM-TRA-1: VMT Transportation Demand Management Reduction Plan. The proposed project shall implement a commute trip reduction program consisting of transportation demand management (TDM) measures that achieve a minimum VMT reduction of 4.9 percent. The VMT reduction associated with the TDM measures to be implemented shall be quantified in accordance with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, Designed for Local Governments, Communities, and Project Developers (December 2021). Per General Plan Condition of Approval (COA) 5.17-3, the project shall provide but is not limited to the following as determined applicable by City staff: 1) Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, or ride-sharing programs; 2) Improve or increase access to transit; 3) Include project measures to reduce transportation requirements such as work from home and flexible work schedules; 4) Link to existing pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; and/or 5) Provide traffic calming where applicable. Alternatively, the project may participate in a regional VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if one has been established) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve stated levels. Within one year of Phase 2 becoming fully operational, the developer must demonstrate a project trip reduction of at least 4.9% from estimated trips based on implementation of the actions and    Page 228 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 30 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga programs outlined in this mitigation measure. If the 4.9% reduction cannot be demonstrated at that time, the project shall expand its VMT program offerings or participate in a regional VMT mitigation bank if such a program is available to achieve the 4.9% reduction goal. The project shall submit annual reports to the City to demonstrate ongoing compliance with this project VMT reduction goal. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-TRA-1, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to vehicle miles traveled (DEIR page 4.17-24). IMPACT TRANS-5: Would the Project cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to transportation and traffic. Substantial Evidence: Regarding Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) impacts, Impact TRANS-2 indicated the Project had a potentially significant VMT impact but that implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA -1, implementation of a Transportation Demand Management Program, would reduce this potential impact to less than significant levels. The VMT analysis for the Project included a regional analysis that compared the Project VMT levels to City-wide (cumulative) levels by 2040. Cumulative link- level boundary VMT per employee within the City boundary is estimated to decrease under the plus Project condition compared to the no Project condition; therefore, the proposed Project is forecast to result in a less than significant VMT impact based on the City-established threshold for cumulative project effect on VMT. The VMT Study recommended Mitigation Measure TRA-1 to reduce Project VMT below the City’s adopted standard. Cumulative project-generated VMT and the cumulative project effect on regional VMT is forecast to be less than significant based on City-established thresholds. The EIR recommended the following mitigation measure to help reduce potential impacts related to Project VMT to less than significant levels: MM-TRA-1: VMT Transportation Demand Management Reduction Plan. See Impact TRA-2 above. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-TRA-1, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to vehicle miles traveled including any potential cumulative contributions (DEIR page 4.17-30). TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES IMPACT TCR-1: Could the project result in a significant impact if it causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k).    Page 229 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 31 Revised September 24, 2025 IMPACT TCR-2: Could the project result in a significant impact if it causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Substantial Evidence: The proposed Project site is located within the ancestral territory of both the Serrano and Gabrieleno tribal groups and is therefore of interest to both Tribes. However, only the Gabrieleno tribe requested consultation on this Project. In the past both the San Manuel and Gabrieleno tribes have expressed concern regarding impacts to artifacts and resources of their tribes and recommended four measures for tribal cultural resources (presented below) but did not indicate whether or not the Project would have any specific impacts on any tribal cultural resources. The text of all tribal measures have been incorporated into the four measures recommended in this EIR (TCR-1 through TCR-4). The only change is all the measures now apply to both tribal groups as appropriate (i.e., in those measures where the specific tribes are named). The Project will be required to comply with all applicable laws and regulations including if unanticipated Native American artifacts or resources are found during grading. The City General Plan contains eight standard conditions of approval for cultural resources (5.5-1 through 5.5-8). However, the four mitigation measures included in Impact TCR-2 below (MM TCR-1 through TCR- 4) include equivalent procedures and requirements so no standard conditions will be applied in this case. The Project will have less than significant impacts in this regard under either the Phase 1 plus Phase 2A scenario or the Phase 1 plus Phase 2B scenario (DEIR pages 4.18-5 and 4.18- 6). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts related to tribal cultural resources to less than significant levels: MM-TCR-1: Tribal Coordination. The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (San Manuel) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation (Gabrieleno) shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation Measure CUL-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic- era cultural resources discovered during project implementation and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a Cultural Resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with San Manuel and Gabrieleno, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for monitors to be present that represent San Manuel and Gabrieleno for the remainder of the project, should San Manuel and/or Gabrieleno elect to place a monitor or monitors onsite. MM-TCR-2: Tribal Monitoring. The project proponent shall retain one or more Native American Monitor(s) from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation (Gabrieleno) and the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (San Manuel). The monitor(s) shall be    Page 230 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 32 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the project description/definition and/or required in connection with the project, such as public improvement work). “Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement(s) shall be submitted to the City as the lead agency prior to the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity or prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The monitor(s) will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground- disturbing activities, soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered tribal cultural resources (TCRs), including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the project proponent and/or /lead agency upon written request to the Tribes. Onsite tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Gabrieleno and San Manuel from a designated point of contact for the project proponent and/or the City as the lead agency that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Gabrieleno and San Manuel to the project proponent and/or the City as the lead agency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the project site possesses the potential to impact Gabrieleno and San Manuel TCRs. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. MM-TCR-3: Document Distribution. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (San Manuel) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation (Gabrieleno). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with San Manuel and Gabrieleno throughout the life of project construction. MM-TCR-4: Tribal Human Remains. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. If Native American human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized on the project site, then Public Resource Code 5097.9 as well as Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 shall be followed. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources    Page 231 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 33 Revised September 24, 2025 Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance. Finding: The EIR found that with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-TCR-1 through MM-TCR-4, the Project would have less than significant impacts relative to tribal cultural resources (DEIR page 4.18-8). C. Effects Determined to Be Significant, Adverse, and Unavoidable As presented in the El Camino Project EIR, the City finds that adverse impacts identified below pertaining to Air Quality and Greenhouse Emissions cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels even with implementation of all feasible mitigation recommended in the DEIR. AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (AIR QUALITY) IMPACT AIR-1: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the South Coast Air Quality Management District 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. Substantial Evidence: DEIR Section 4.3.5 found that regional operational NOx emissions were potentially significant for Phases 1 and 2 and required mitigation. In addition, it found that combined regional Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction were potentially significant for VOC and NOx and required mitigation. The proposed Project is within the South Coast Air Basin which is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. Pursuant to the methodology provided in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the AQMP is affirmed if the Project: (1) Is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP; and (2) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new one. Consistency Criterion 1 refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the AQMP. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. The proposed Project is estimated to create approximately 289 net new jobs. This value is within the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS growth projection for the City of Rancho Cucamonga of 420 jobs per year, which is an average rate across almost three decades (2016 to 2045. The employment growth associated with the Project (net 289 jobs) represents less than 2% of the anticipated total employment growth in the City between 2016 and 2045 (16,800 jobs). Therefore, the proposed Project would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP. Consistency Criterion 2 refers to the AQMP which contains control measures intended to achieve attainment of ambient air quality standards in the South Coast Air Basin. The Project would comply with SCAQMD rules developed as part of the AQMP; however, as described under Impact AIR-2 below, however the proposed Project’s mitigated emissions levels are anticipated to exceed SCAQMD NOX emissions thresholds during Phase 1 and Phase 2 operations and during combined Phase 1 operations and Phase 2B construction. This increase in emissions above recommended thresholds could result in new and/or more frequent or more severe exceedances of regional air quality standards. Therefore, the proposed Project has the potential to conflict with    Page 232 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 34 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga the SCAQMD 2022 AQMP due to exceedances of the SCAQMD NOx daily significance threshold even after mitigation. This impact would be significant and unavoidable even with mitigation (DEIR pages 4.3-49 to 4.3-50). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures in an attempt to reduce these air pollutant emission impacts to less than significant levels: MM-AIR-2A: Reduce Construction VOC Emissions. To reduce construction-related emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the City shall require the applicant to implement the following measures during all Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction activities: 1) Use architectural coatings that meet the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) “Super Compliant” VOC standard of 10 grams/liter or less for all interior and exterior primer, sealer, paint, and other coating applications for which a super compliant product is commercially available. a) If feasible given contract, logistical, and other construction factors, avoid painting during peak smog season (July, August, and September) if super compliant coatings are not commercially available. 2) Keep all coating containers closed when not in use to prevent VOC emissions. 3) Keep all paint and solvent laden rags and other materials in sealed containers to prevent VOC emissions. 4) Clean up water-based paints with water only and when possible do not rinse clean-up water down the drain, onto the ground, or into a storm drain. 5) Use SCAQMD compliant Clean Air Solvents to clean paint application equipment. 6) Recycle leftover paint. MM-AIR-2B: Reduce Construction NOx and PM Exhaust Emissions. To reduce construction- related exhaust emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), including diesel particulate matter (DPM), the City shall require the applicant to implement the following measures during all Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction activities: 1) Connect to existing electrical service to power construction trailers and stationary and portable equipment (e.g., pumps, generators, compressors, and welding sets). This measure shall be subject to the approval of the local electric utility. If it is not feasible to connect to electrical service and/or extend electrical service to all work sites, biodiesel (no more than B20 blend), renewable diesel, or propane shall be used to power stationary and portable equipment provided the use of such fuels is allowed pursuant to manufacturer’s specifications. The use of stationary or portable diesel-fueled equipment shall be prohibited in the project area unless electrical service is denied, alternative fuels are not permitted by the manufacturer for the specific equipment in use, and there are no alternative equipment types capable of being powered by alternative fuels that can be used instead of the standard diesel-fueled equipment. 2) All construction equipment with a rated power-output of 50 horsepower (hp) or greater shall be certified to meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 Final nonroad diesel engine emissions standards for NOX and PM10, or be retrofitted with California Air Resources Board (CARB)-verified diesel emissions control strategies capable of reducing exhaust NOX and PM10 emissions to levels that meet Tier 4 Final emissions standards, unless the applicant submits evidence to the City that specific equipment meeting this requirement is not available on loan, rent, or other terms of use within 200 miles of the city. In this instance, the next highest available emissions tier (e.g., Tier 4 Interim, Tier 3) for the specific equipment in question shall be required.    Page 233 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 35 Revised September 24, 2025 3) Limit idling of diesel-powered construction equipment, vendor delivery trucks, and hauling trucks to no more than two minutes unless manufacturer’s specifications specifically require main engine idling is necessary to maintain equipment in good working order. MM-AIR-2C: Reduce Light-duty Vehicle Trip Emissions. To reduce light duty vehicle trip emissions (i.e., passenger cars and pick-up trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of 8,500 pounds or less), the City shall require the applicant to comply with the voluntary Tier 1 designated parking for clean air vehicles and electric vehicle (EV) charging provisions contained in the version of the California Green Building Code (CalGreen Code) that is in effect at the time of building permit approval, unless the City has adopted local requirements that are more stringent than the CalGreen Code. As of January 1, 2025, the 2022 CalGreen Code includes the following voluntary clean air vehicle parking and EV charging provisions for non-residential projects: 1) Designated Parking for Clean Air Vehicles Tier 1 Provisions (CalGreen Code Section A5.106.5.1): The number of combined designated parking spaces for a zero-emitting, fuel- efficient, and car/vanpool vehicles shall be 35% of the total number of parking spaces provided by the project. Based on the project’s current proposed 521 parking spaces, the total number of clean air vehicle designated parking spaces for the project equals 182 spaces. 2) EV Charging Tier 1 Provisions (CalGreen Code Section A5.106.5.3): The number of EV capable spaces, and EV capable spaces with electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), which creates an electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) shall be determined based on the total number of actual parking spaces as set forth in CalGreen Code Table A5.106.5.3.1. Based on the project’s current proposed number of 521 parking spaces: a) The number of EV capable spaces shall be 30% of the total parking spaces provided. Based on the project’s current proposed 521 parking spaces, the total number of EV capable spaces for the project equals 157 spaces. b) The number of EV capable spaces provided with EVSE shall be 33% of the number of EV capable spaces provided by the project. Based on the project’s estimated total number of EV capable spaces for the project (157, see subsection a) above), the number of EV capable spaces with EVSE for the project equals 52 spaces (assuming all EVSE are level 2 charging equipment). The spaces with EVSE count towards the total number EV capable spaces required by subsection a) above. The EVSE may be any combination of level 2 and direct current fast charging equipment as permitted by CalGreen Code Section 5.106.5.3.2 (EVCS), and the EVCS may be managed by an automatic load management system (ALMS) in accordance with CalGreen Code Section 5.106.5.3.3 (ALMS). MM-AIR-2D: Prepare VMT/TDM Reduction Plan (SAME AS TRA-1). The project shall implement a commute trip reduction program consisting of transportation demand management (TDM) measures that achieve a minimum VMT reduction of 4.9 percent. The VMT reduction associated with the TDM measures to be implemented shall be quantified in accordance with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, Designed for Local Governments, Communities, and Project Developers (December 2021). Per General Plan Condition of Approval (COA) 5.17-3, the project shall provide but is not limited to the following as determined applicable by City staff: 1) Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs; 2) Improve or increase access to transit;    Page 234 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 36 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga 3) Incorporate neighborhood electric vehicle networks into the project; 4) Include project measures to reduce transportation requirements such as work from home and flexible work schedules; 5) Link to existing pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; and/or 6) Provide traffic calming where applicable. MM-AIR-2E: Reduce Truck Trip Emissions. To reduce truck trip emissions (i.e., light-heavy, medium-heavy, and heavy-heavy duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight of 8,501 pounds or greater) and promote the use of near-zero emission (NZE) and zero emission vehicles (ZEV), the City shall require the applicant to: 1) Exceed the mandatory electric vehicle (EV) charging readiness requirements for planned off-street loading spaces specified in the version of the California Green Building Code (CalGreen Code) that is in effect at the time of building permit approval, unless the City has adopted local requirements that are more stringent than the CalGreen Code. As of January 1, 2025, the 2022 CalGreen Code, Section 5.106.5.4 (EV charging: medium-duty and heavy-duty), specifies minimum power requirements for dedicated branch circuits, reserved locations for medium and heavy-duty ZEV charging cabinets and conduit routing, and sufficiently sized raceways and busways between electrical service panels and ZEV charging areas. Therefore, the City shall require the applicant to: a) Design and include sufficient space for the transformer, main service equipment, and cabinets/subpanels necessary to accommodate a sufficient number of branch circuits to provide future installation of electric vehicle service equipment (EVSE) at all truck docks and main truck parking areas. b) Design and incorporate a sufficient number of raceways/busways to provide future EVSE installation at all truck docks and main truck parking areas. c) Dedicate/preserve convenient locations near all truck docks and main truck parking areas for the future installation of EVSE and reserve pathways for conduits needed to connect the EVSE to other electrical service equipment (e.g., raceway, cabinet, etc.) d) Install EVSE at 10% of the total truck docks included in the final Project design. Based on the project’s estimated total number of truck docks (57, see subsection a) above), the number of docks with EVSE for the project equals 6 docks. 2) Transport Refrigeration Unit (TRU) Restrictions: The applicant shall prohibit the use of diesel fueled TRUs on-site. All TRUs operated at the site shall be powered by electricity 3) Idling Signage: Signs shall be posted at all truck access gates and loading dock areas reminding drivers of idling limitations. The signs shall be clearly visible, readable at a distance of 10 feet, and notify truck drivers that: a) The vehicle’s primary diesel engine shall be turned off when not in use. b) The vehicle’s primary diesel engine shall not idle for more than 5 consecutive minutes at any location pursuant to Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2485. MM-GHG-1: Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions. To reduce GHG emissions from appliance-related energy consumption, the City shall require all applicant installed refrigerators, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers, and room air conditioners intended for employee use to be Energy Star certified products.    Page 235 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 37 Revised September 24, 2025 MM-GHG-2: Reduce Building Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions. To reduce GHG emissions associated with the performance of the building envelope and systems components covered by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, the City shall require all new construction and major renovations undertaken by the applicant associated with the Project to be designed to have a total energy design rating that is at least 5% less than the standard building design for Climate Zone 15. The energy budget for the standard design building and the energy budget for the proposed design building shall be determined in accordance with the definitions and approach set forth in the version of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Energy Code) that is in effect at the time of building permit approval (currently the 2022 Energy Code), unless the City has adopted local requirements that are more stringent than the Energy Code. The requirement to reduce a project’s energy budget by 5% below the standard design building shall not apply if the Energy Code or the City has already established a zero net energy requirement for the standard design building. Finding: The DEIR found that, even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the Project would still result in significant regional operational NOx emissions for Phases 1 and 2 and combined regional Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction emissions were still significant for NOx. These emissions were significant and unavoidable and require a Statement of Overriding Considerations. IMPACT AIR-2: Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutants for which the South Coast Air Basin is designated non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Substantial Evidence: DEIR Section 4.3.5 found the Project would have potentially significant regional NOx emissions during operation of Phases 1 and 2 and required mitigation. In addition, the EIR found that combined regional Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction Project emissions were potentially significant for VOC and NOx and required mitigation. This is the result of Project emissions from vehicles and stationary sources exceeding the daily significance thresholds established by SCAQMD for NOx and VOCs as indicated (DEIR pages 4.3-51 to 4.3-63). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures in an attempt to reduce these air pollutant emission impacts to less than significant levels: MM-AIR-2A: Reduce Construction VOC Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2B: Reduce Construction NOx & PM Exhaust Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above) MM-AIR-2C: Reduce Light-duty Vehicle Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2D: Prepare VMT/TDM Reduction Plan (SAME AS TRA-1). (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2E: Reduce Truck Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-GHG-1: Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-GHG-2: Reduce Building Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above).    Page 236 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 38 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Finding: The DEIR found that, even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the Project would still result in significant regional operational NOx emissions for Phases 1 and 2 and combined regional Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction emissions were still significant for NOx. These emissions were significant and unavoidable and require a Statement of Overriding Considerations (DEIR page 4.3-63). IMPACT AIR-5: Would the project cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to air quality. Substantial Evidence: The level of expected future development in the City and surrounding areas is substantial (i.e., 174 projects in four jurisdictions with 8,362 residential units and approximately 15 million square feet of non-residential development). In addition, the City expects continued growth based on its General Plan population and housing projections. While it is possible that cumulative projects 16- 18 may be under construction during the same timeframe as the Project, it is difficult to predict with any certainty due to the many factors involved in starting and maintaining construction (e.g., financing, equipment and staff availability, weather, etc.). In developing its CEQA significance thresholds, the SCAQMD considered the emission levels at which a Project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. As described under Impact AIR-2A, the proposed Project would result in potentially significant VOC and NOx impacts for regional construction emissions, regional operational emissions, and combined Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B construction emissions. The Project would incorporate Mitigation Measures AIR-2A through AIR-2E; however, regional operational emissions for NOx as well as combined operational and construction emissions for NOx would remain above SCAQMD thresholds and have the potential cause or contribute to existing or future air quality violations, thus conflicting with the 2022 AQMP (DEIR pages 4.3-72 and 4.3-73). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures in an attempt to reduce these cumulative air pollutant emission impacts to less than significant levels: MM-AIR-2A: Reduce Construction VOC Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2B: Reduce Construction NOx & PM Exhaust Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above) MM-AIR-2C: Reduce Light-duty Vehicle Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2D: Prepare VMT/TDM Reduction Plan (SAME AS TRA-1). (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2E: Reduce Truck Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-GHG-1: Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-GHG-2: Reduce Building Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). Finding: The DEIR found that, even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the Project would still result in significant regional operational NOx emissions for Phases 1 and 2 and    Page 237 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 39 Revised September 24, 2025 combined regional Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction emissions were still significant for NOx. These emissions were significant and unavoidable and require a Statement of Overriding Considerations (DEIR page 4.3-73). GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IMPACT GHG-1: Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Substantial Evidence: DEIR Section 4.8.5 states the proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from the short- term construction and long-term operational sources. Construction activities would cease to emit GHG upon completion, unlike operational emissions that would be continuous year after year over the life of the Project. Accordingly, the SCAQMD recommends averaging construction GHG emissions over a 30-year period and combining this average with operational emissions estimates to facilitate comparison to potential thresholds, standards, plans, etc. that may be based on annualized GHG emissions estimates or GHG reduction targets. The Project’s construction-related GHG emissions were estimated using Project-specific construction activities and SCAQMD-recommended air quality and GHG emissions modeling software (i.e., CalEEMod). Once operational, the Project would generate GHG emissions from mobile, area, energy, water/wastewater, solid waste, refrigeration, off -road, and stationary sources. The Project’s operational-related energy consumption was estimated using Project- specific development and operational characteristics, manufacturer’s equipment specifications, and SCAQMD-recommended modeling software (i.e., CalEEMod). It is noted that the proposed Project’s operational GHG emissions would vary by phase, equipment operations (anticipated minimum or potential maximum operations), and whether or not thermal recovery from the cogeneration system is used to offset natural gas combustion in Phase 2 boiler operation. The EIR evaluated worst-case GHG emissions estimates for each Project phase based on maximum potential stationary source equipment operations (i.e., maximum 100% operating times instead of anticipated typical operating times). The proposed Project would result in a net increase in annual GHG emissions compared to existing conditions for all phases and operating scenarios that is above the SCAQMD’s industrial threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year. During initial Phase 1 operations in 2026, the Project would result in a net increase in GHG emissions equal to 29,822 MTCO2e, with the largest net increases occurring from trucks and passenger vehicles (approximately 55% of the net increase), building energy (approximately 20% of the net increase), and the primary boiler’s natural gas consumption (approximately 19% of the net increase). The Project’s GHG emissions would increase in Phase 2, beginning in 2027, due to the operation of more stationary source equipment in the PC, including a second primary boiler and the cogeneration system. The net increase in GHG emissions during Phase 2 would be contingent on the amount of net electricity and thermal recovery that occurs from the proposed cogeneration system but would be between approximately 43,899 MTCO2e per year and approximately 41,126 MMBtu with thermal recovery. Similar to Phase 1, the largest net increases in GHG emissions during Phase 2 would be from truck and passenger vehicle trips (approximately 37% to 39% of the net increase) and boilers (between approximately 27% and 29% of the net increase); however, the planned cogeneration system would substantially reduce building energy GHG emissions from approximately 7,663 MTCO2e per year in Phase 1 to 4,504 MTCO2e per year in Phase 2.    Page 238 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 40 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga The proposed Project’s net increase in GHG emissions, at worst-case, would be approximately 29,822 MTCO2e per year during Phase 1 and approximately 43,899 MTCO2e per year during Phase 2, which exceeds the SCAQMD’s industrial 10,000 MTCO2e threshold. To reduce the proposed Project’s operational GHG emissions levels, the City will require the implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1, Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions, and GHG-2, Reduce Building Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions. These mitigation measures will increase the Project’s energy efficiency and reduce building energy consumption. Combined, these measures are estimated to lower GHG emissions between approximately 68 MTCO2e and 150 MTCO2e per year, or 1.5% to 2% of total building energy emissions (DEIR pages 4.8-25 to 4.8-31). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures in an attempt to reduce these greenhouse gas emission impacts to less than significant levels: MM-GHG-1: Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions. To reduce GHG emissions from appliance-related energy consumption, the City shall require all applicant installed refrigerators, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers, and room air conditioners intended for employee use to be Energy Star certified products. MM-GHG-2: Reduce Building Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions. To reduce GHG emissions associated with the performance of the building envelope and systems components covered by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, the City shall require all new construction and major renovations undertaken by the applicant associated with the Project to be designed to have a total energy design rating that is at least 5% less than the standard building design for Climate Zone 15. The energy budget for the standard design building and the energy budget for the proposed design building shall be determined in accordance with the definitions and approach set forth in the version of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Energy Code) that is in effect at the time of building permit approval (currently the 2022 Energy Code), unless the City has adopted local requirements that are more stringent than the Energy Code. The requirement to reduce a project’s energy budget by 5% below the standard design building shall not apply if the Energy Code or the City has already established a zero net energy requirement for the standard design building. Finding: Even with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-GHG-1 and MM-GHG-2, the greenhouse gas emissions of the Project would not be reduced to less than significant levels and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required. Impacts are significant and unavoidable. IMPACT GHG-3: Cause substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to GHGs. Substantial Evidence: Global climate change is the result of GHG emissions worldwide; individual projects do not generate enough GHG emissions to influence global climate change. Thus, the analysis of GHG emissions is by nature, an inherently cumulative analysis focused on whether an individual project’s contribution to global climate change is cumulatively considerable. As described under Impacts GHG-1 and GHG-2, the proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions but would generate GHG emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s 10,000 MTCO2e per year industrial significance threshold applied in this EIR. Accordingly, the proposed Project would result in a cumulatively    Page 239 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 41 Revised September 24, 2025 considerable and significant GHG emissions contribution even after the incorporation of mitigation measures. In addition to the GHG-specific mitigation measures, the City shall also require the applicant to implement Mitigation Measures AIR-2C, Reduce Light-Duty Vehicle Trip Emissions, AIR-2D/TRA- 1, Prepare VMT/TDM Reduction Plan, and AIR-2E, Reduce Truck Trip Emissions, which would increase the amount of passenger vehicle and truck EV charging infrastructure installed at the Project site and reduce employee trips and associated VMT by approximately 5% (DEIR page 4.8-39). The EIR recommended the following mitigation measures in an attempt to reduce these greenhouse gas emission impacts to less than significant levels: MM-GHG-1: Reduce Appliance Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact GHG- 1 above). MM-GHG-2: Reduce Building Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions. (see Impact GHG-1 above). MM-AIR-2C: Reduce Light-duty Vehicle Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2D: Prepare VMT/TDM Reduction Plan (SAME AS TRA-1). (see Impact AIR-1 above). MM-AIR-2E: Reduce Truck Trip Emissions. (see Impact AIR-1 above). Finding: Even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, cumulative greenhouse gas emissions of the Project would not be reduced to less than significant levels and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required. Impacts are significant and unavoidable.    Page 240 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 42 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 ALTERNATIVES This section contains a discussion of the alternatives considered and rejected in the El Camino Project DEIR, including the No Project – No Development; Expand Existing Facility (Alternative 1); Reduced Intensity (Alternative 2); and Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential/Office)(Alternative 3). For alternative locations, “only locations that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project need be considered for inclusion in the EIR” (Section 15126.6(f)(2)(A)). The significant impacts of the proposed Project (NOx and GHG emissions) are based on the type and size of the proposed use so this project on any other site would still result in significant impacts identified in the EIR. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(a), this EIR does not evaluate every conceivable alternative. A feasible range of alternatives that will allow decision-makers to make a reasoned choice and that meet most of the Project’s guiding principles has been evaluated. Project Objectives The Project is intended to implement the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan. The purpose of this Project is to implement the vision laid out in the Project objectives. The Project would generally increase the City’s production capacity and further fortify the economic base of the City. It would also revitalize a portion of the City with new and renovated industry and production. The Project is proposed to be developed to accomplish the following objectives: Objective 1: Facilitate the continued operation of the existing distribution facility with expanded operations and employment capacity. Objective 2: Redevelop an existing industrial site with modern and sustainable facilities, including large-scale buildings, intricate manufacturing processes, and large employment opportunities. Objective 3: Develop and operate an attractive state-of-the-art manufacturing and distribution facility in the City that meets industry standards to be competitive with similar facilities in the region. Objective 4: Maximize the efficiency of the existing operations during the expansion process by providing interim manufacturing steps within the same building envelope. Objective 5: Develop and operate a production and bottling facility that positively contributes to the local economy through new capital investment and the creation of new employment opportunities, including opportunities for highly-trained workers. Objective 6: Develop an industrial and manufacturing facility that is in close proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, and other major transportation arterial roadways, to support the production of consumer goods and the distribution of manufactured goods throughout the region. Objective 7: Implement a microgrid energy production system via cogeneration at an existing manufacturing site to minimize manufacturing waste and to reduce the demand on existing public services and systems while employing carbon-reducing technologies and reduce the facility’s potential climate impact.    Page 241 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 43 Revised September 24, 2025 Selection of Alternatives To provide a basis for further understanding of the environmental effects of a proposed project and possible approaches to reducing its identified significant impacts, the CEQA Guidelines require an EIR to also “describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project, but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives.” In addition to the No Project-No Development Alternative, which is essentially existing conditions on the site at the time the NOP was issued, the following three alternatives were selected for detailed evaluation in comparison to the proposed Project: Alternative 1 - Expand Existing Facility. This alternative would almost double the area of the existing beverage distribution facility to 400,000 square feet for new non-residential uses and provide beverage bottling in addition to and in conjunction with the current distribution facility. It would have no residential units and would allow the existing beverage warehouse/distribution building to continue operation. This plan would utilize surface parking and the new building would have a maximum height of approximately 35-40 feet. The land not needed for the new building footprint or parking would be landscaped with walkways for employees and possibly public use if such areas were created along the boundaries of the site (i.e., along adjacent roadways). This alternative would also include use/reuse of the existing warehouse on the Phase 2 property. This alternative includes a new CVWD well but not cogeneration. Alternative 2 - Reduced Intensity. This alternative would develop about 540,000 square feet of light industrial (non-residential) use, which is approximately 30% less new building area compared to the proposed Project. This plan would have no residential units but require demolition of the existing beverage distribution facility. This plan would eliminate the proposed parking structure and use the remaining non-built area of the site for surface parking. This plan would have landscaping and outdoor use areas for employees consistent with the City General Plan and Development Code requirements. This alternative includes cogeneration and a new CVWD well. Alternative 3 - Mixed Use (C/R/O). This alternative would develop 675,000 square feet of new office and commercial uses on the first two floors of three new four-story buildings on the site (commercial on ground floor and offices on the 2nd floor). This plan would also have 270 residential units on the top two floors of the three new buildings. The remainder of the site would have covered and uncovered surface parking, landscaping, and employee and tenant and public use areas on the remainder of the site (play equipment, pickleball courts, walkways, dog park, etc.). The site would be developed according to the General Plan and Development Code requirements for the site with a small internal street east off Haven Avenue visually dividing the property which would be consistent with the development code and general plan block network standards and policies. This alternative is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation (21st Century Employment District) and the existing zoning classification (ME2). While there are other possible variations of land plans that meet the General Plan and zoning designations, this one was selected as a reasonable alternate land plan for evaluation in the EIR.    Page 242 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 44 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga Evaluation of Alternatives Substantial Evidence: No Project Alternative The No Project Alternative represents existing conditions on the site and would have no impacts or less than significant impacts compared to those of the proposed Project due to the fact there would be no new development and only a continuation of uses under this Alternative, and it would result in no significant and unavoidable impacts. It would also not achieve any of the Project Objectives which would involve some type of new development on the site. Alternative 1: Expand Existing Facility DEIR Section 5.5 concluded this alternative would have the following less than significant impacts that are equivalent to those of the proposed Project due to the fact the entire site will be disturbed: Agriculture and Forest Resources; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources; Mineral Resources; and Tribal Cultural Resources. DEIR Section 5.5 also concluded that Alternative 1 would have the following reduced and less than significant impacts relative to those of the proposed Project since it involves less intense development: Aesthetics; Air Quality (health risks, odors); Energy; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Population, Housing, and Employment; Noise and Vibration; Public Services; Recreation; Utilities and Service Systems; Transportation; and Wildfire Alternative 1 would have the following impacts that are less than those of the proposed Project but are still significant and unavoidable even with implementation of all recommended feasible mitigation measures: Air Quality (AQMP Consistency, project and cumulative NOx emissions); and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Alternative 2: Reduced Intensity DEIR Section 5.6 concluded this alternative would have the following less than significant impacts that are equivalent to those of the proposed Project due to the fact the entire site will be disturbed: Agriculture and Forest Resources; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources; Mineral Resources; and Tribal Cultural Resources. DEIR Section 5.6 also concluded that Alternative 2 would have the following reduced and less than significant impacts relative to those of the proposed Project since it involves less intense development: Aesthetics; Air Quality (health risks, odors); Energy; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Population, Housing, and Employment; Noise and Vibration; Public Services; Recreation; Utilities and Service Systems; Transportation; and Wildfire Alternative 2 would have the following impacts that are less than those of the proposed Project but are still significant and unavoidable even with implementation of all recommended feasible mitigation measures: Air Quality (AQMP Consistency, project and cumulative NOx emissions); and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.    Page 243 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 45 Revised September 24, 2025 Alternative 3: Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential/Office) DEIR Section 5.7 concluded this alternative would have the following less than significant impacts that are equivalent to those of the proposed Project due to the fact the entire site will be disturbed: Agriculture and Forest Resources; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources; Mineral Resources; and Tribal Cultural Resources. DEIR Section 5.7 also concluded that Alternative 3 would have the following reduced and less than significant impacts relative to those of the proposed Project based on the analysis of the mix of land use proposed for this alternative (i.e., commercial, office, and residential): Aesthetics; Air Quality (health risks, odors); Energy; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Population, Housing, and Employment; Public Services; Recreation; Utilities and Service Systems; Transportation; and Wildfire. Alternative 3 would have the following impacts that are less than those of the proposed Project but are still significant and unavoidable even with implementation of all recommended feasible mitigation measures: Air Quality (AQMP Consistency, project and cumulative VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions); Greenhouse Gas Emissions; and Noise and Vibration (from increased vehicular traffic) Meeting Project Objectives DEIR Section 5.9 indicated the No Project Alternative does not meet the Project Objectives since it involves no development. Alternatives 1 and 2 do not meet the Project Objectives to nearly the same degree as the proposed Project because they do not provide sufficient additional space to adequately manufacture, bottle, and distribute the planned beverages on the scale envisioned by the Project. In addition, Alternative 3 does not meet the Objectives of the Project because it proposes land uses that are consistent with the General Plan and zoning but do not provide for expanded beverage distribution and new bottling capabilities which is proposed by the Project. Environmentally Superior Alternative The No Project Alternative eliminates the significant impacts of the Project, so it is environmentally superior to the Project but it does not achieve any of the Project Objectives. Therefore, one of the development alternatives must be identified as an environmentally superior alternative as well. Alternative 1 – Expand Existing Facility, reduces potential impacts of the Project to the greatest extent practical although it does not eliminate or reduce either of the significant and unavoidable impacts of the Project (air quality and greenhouse gas emissions) to less than significant levels. Alternative 2 also reduces impacts of the proposed Project but not nearly to the same degree as Alternative 1 and also does not eliminate either of the significant impacts of the Project. In addition, Alternative 3 would likely result in significant noise impacts due to its substantial increase in vehicular traffic so it would result in three significant and unavoidable impacts compared to the two significant impacts of Alternatives 1 and 2 and the proposed Project. Alternatives 1 and 2 do not meet the Project Objectives to nearly the same degree as the proposed Project because they do not provide sufficient space to create a unified beverage manufacturing, bottling, and distribution facility as envisioned by the proposed Project. Alternative 3 does not meet the Objectives of the Project because it proposes a mix of land uses that do not include a larger beverage bottling and distribution facility as included in the proposed Project.    Page 244 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 46 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga For these reasons, The EIR determined that Alternative 1 – Expand Existing Facility, is the Environmentally Superior Alternative to the proposed Project. Findings: DEIR Section 5.10 found Alternative 1 to be environmentally superior to the Project although it did not eliminate or reduce either of the significant impacts of the Project (NOx and greenhouse gas emissions) to less than significant levels. In addition, Alternative 1 does not meet the Project Objectives to nearly the same degree as the proposed Project because it does not provide sufficient additional space to adequately manufacture, bottle, and distribute the planned beverages on the scale envisioned by the Project or needed for the existing facility to operate at peak efficiency. For these reasons, the City determines that Alternative 1 is less desirable than the proposed Project and therefore rejects the alternative per Public Resources Code § 21081(a)(3); CEQA Guidelines, §15091(a)(3).    Page 245 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 47 Revised September 24, 2025 7 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CEQA requires that a Lead Agency balance the benefits of a project against its adverse and unavoidable effects in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered “acceptable” pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a). CEQA requires that a Lead Agency support, in writing, the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are infeasible to mitigate. Those reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or elsewhere in the administrative record pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(b). The Lead Agency’s written reasons are referred to as a Statement of Overriding Considerations. For those significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance, the Lead Agency is required to find that the specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant impacts on the environment. Regarding a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines provides the following: 1. CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." 2. When the lead agency approves a project that will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the Final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the Final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. 3. If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the Notice of Determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. The City will approve the El Camino Project and has prepared a Final EIR that satisfies the requirements of CEQA. The following adverse impacts of the project are considered significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the Draft EIR (DEIR), Final EIR (FEIR), and the Findings of Fact. • Impact AIR-1: Conflict with or Obstruct Implementation of Applicable Air Quality Plans because it would exceed the growth assumption of the 2022 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions would exceed SCAQMD’s regional threshold, thereby impeding AQMP attainment. (Regional operational and combined phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction). • Impact AIR-2: Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of non-attainment criteria pollutants for which the project region is in non-attainment (including NOx). (Regional operational and combined Phase 1 operational and Phase 2B regional construction).    Page 246 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 48 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga • Impact AIR-5: Cause adverse substantial adverse cumulative impacts with respect to air quality (Cumulative Impact from NOx operational emissions). • Impact GHG-1: Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. • Impact GHG-3: Cause a substantial adverse cumulative impact with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (Cumulative Impact). The City has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above are acceptable because those impacts are outweighed by the economic, social, technological, and other benefits of the Project, listed below. • The project will maintain the City’s economic viability and productivity over the long term by encouraging efficient and sustainable use of the overall site, a portion of which at present is vacant. • The project increases an employment generating use thereby increasing employment opportunities within Rancho Cucamonga. • The project provides for expanded and comprehensive siting of an important employer and business to help sustain a strong local economy, with design qualities that contribute to its success. • The project will expand an industrial and manufacturing facility with ready access to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, and other major transportation arterial roadways, to support the production of consumer goods and the distribution of manufactured goods throughout the region. • The project provides for the development and maintenance of a citywide bicycle network of off-street bike paths, off-street sidewalks, and on-street bike lanes, including along Haven Avenue, 6th Street, 7th Street, and Utica Avenue. • The project proportionally supports a connected, balanced, integrated, safe, and multi- modal transportation system that accommodates all travel options. • The project promotes the use of transit within the City as a means of reducing local traffic congestion, achieving greenhouse gases reduction targets, and connecting the community physically and socially. • The project includes energy efficiency and conservation systems and measures that reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. • The project will Implement a microgrid energy production system via cogeneration at an existing manufacturing site to minimize manufacturing waste and to reduce the demand on existing public services and systems while employing carbon-reducing technologies and reduce the facility’s potential climate impacts.    Page 247 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact 49 Revised September 24, 2025 • The project will increase the potential for beverage manufacturing as a revenue- generating land use for the City. The City Council hereby finds that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through the approval of the project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the project that cannot be mitigated. The City Council finds that each of the Project benefits separately and individually outweighs all of the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that no feasible alternative exists that both would provide all of the foregoing benefits to the public and reduce environmental impacts when compared to the Project.    Page 248 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 50 El Camino Project EIR Findings of Fact City of Rancho Cucamonga This Page Intentionally Left Blank    Page 249 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions As a condition of approval, the structure is to be marked /lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 M, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights-Chapters 4,5(Red),&15. Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. 1. The project shall comply with all site -specific development standards established through the subject master plan application in addition to all relevant development standards. To the extent any standard conditions of approval conflict with the site -specific development standards established by the master plan, then those site -specific development standards take precedent over standard conditions of approval. Any future deviations from site -specific master plan or development standards may result in additional entitlements or modifications to project entitlements. 2. Standard Conditions of Approval For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 4. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 5. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 250 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials , officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures ) (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions , related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee in the amount consistent with current fees at the time of project approval. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 251 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 9. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code . Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. If the developer chooses the installation of art option, or chooses a combination of the art installation and in lieu fee payment option, any public art costs not expended which are equal to the art value must be paid as part of an in lieu fee prior to certificate of occupancy. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist 's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 11. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 252 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 12. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right -of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 13. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.14. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 15. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 16. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 17. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 18. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 19. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street.20. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 21. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 22. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 23. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and master plan and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 24. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 25. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 253 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 26. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 27. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations , the General Plan, the project Environmental Impact Report, associated CEQA findings and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 28. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 29. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 30. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 31. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner , homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 32. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800 ) prior to the issuance of Building Permits . Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties . 33. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 34. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 254 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 35. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 36. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 37. Trash receptacle(s)/enclosure(s ) are required and shall meet relevant standards. The applicant shall provide the City approval from the local refuse service provider, Burrtec, of trash/refuse plan, including number and location of trash enclosures, prior to the issuance of building permits. 38. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Prior to the release of encroachment permit of the project, the property owner must enter into an agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish ongoing maintenance responsibilities for the proposed private drainage within the public storm drain easement along Haven Ave. This agreement shall outline the scope of maintenance, inspection schedules, and any necessary corrective actions to be undertaken. A copy of the executed agreement shall be provided to the relevant authorities for record-keeping purposes. The maintenance obligation shall remain in effect for the life of the drainage device and shall be transferred to any subsequent property owners as applicable. 1. 6th Street Improvements: All proposed street improvements along 6th Street within the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the standards, specifications, and design intent established by the recent 6th Street Capital Improvement Project. The applicant shall coordinate with the City’s Engineering Department to ensure consistency with the approved plans, including but not limited to roadway alignment, streetscape elements, pedestrian infrastructure, and utility placements. Furthermore, the applicant shall acknowledge and comply with the existing moratorium on construction activities along 6th Street. No work shall commence within the affected corridor until the moratorium is lifted or written authorization is provided by the City. Any proposed exceptions must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer as per section 12.03.040 of the Municipal Code. 2. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 255 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Phased Pad Elevation and Foundation Construction: The applicant shall be permitted to construct pad elevations and building foundations in phases , consistent with the approved building phasing plan for the project. Each phase of pad grading and foundation installation shall be subject to review and approval by the City’s Building and Safety Division and Engineering Department prior to commencement. All phased work must demonstrate compliance with the overall site grading plan, drainage requirements, and geotechnical recommendations to ensure proper integration with adjacent phases . The applicant shall provide updated grading and foundation plans for each phase, including verification of pad elevation benchmarks, prior to issuance of building permits for that phase. No deviation from the approved phasing sequence shall be allowed without prior written authorization from the City. 3. CFD District: The developer shall enter into an Annexation Proceeding and sign a Consent and Waiver to join Community Facilities District CFD 2022-01 and CFD2022-02 (Street Lighting Services) and shall be filed by Special Districts prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Any annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. For any questions and /or processing coordination of the CFD please contact Kelly Guerra at (909) 774-2582 or by email at kelly.guerra@cityofrc.us. 4. Applicant shall pay all applicable Development Impact Fees prior to the issuance of the Building Permit.5. Parcel Map The project's Vesting Tentative Parcel Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved and recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorders Office prior to issuance of occupancy . 6. The applicant shall submit the following improvement plans to the Engineering Department for review . Each plan set shall be submitted as a separate package: Street Improvement Plans Storm Drain Plans Signing and Striping Plans Streetlight Plans Fiber Optic Plans Grading Plans On-site Sewer and Water Plans Parcel Map Off-site Landscaping Plans 7. The developer shall submit revised plans to the City for review and approval prior to permit issuance , reflecting the removal of the Haven Avenue frontage lane as shown on the entitlement set. The revised plans shall conform to all applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga standards and shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall coordinate with Omnitrans to ensure that the revised frontage design does not conflict with existing or planned transit operations or facilities. 8. www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 256 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions The developer shall coordinate with both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Omnitrans regarding the design and construction of the proposed bus stop along Haven Avenue. The bus stop shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable City standards and shall be consistent with Omnitrans’ operational requirements and plans for this transit route. Final design and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Omnitrans. 9. Standard Conditions of Approval A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 10. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 11. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of historical surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 12. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 13. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City 's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 14. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: - CVWD - City of Rancho Cucamonga 15. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 16. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement agreement shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: Haven Avenue, 6th Street, Utica Avenue, and 7th Street. 17. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 257 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Haven Avenue, 6th Street, Utica Avenue, and 7th Street. 18. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans .” If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 19. “Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4” Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 ¼” innerducts in one of the 4” conduits, per City Standard 145. The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.” 20. www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 258 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: HAVEN AVENUE: - Curb & Gutter - A.C. Pavement - Sidewalk - Bus Stop - Drive Appr. - Streetlights Relocation - Street Trees - Class 4 Bike Path; Including Transition to existing , past property lines - Signing & Striping - Storm Drain - Fiber Optic Conduit - Utilities - Sewer & Water - Other 6TH STREET: - Curb & Gutter - 2'' Grind and overlay for the following: - Westbound Lanes: Curb to Median - Eastbound Lanes: Median to Next Lane Line - Sidewalk - Drive Appr. - Street Trees - Reconstruction of Median Island - Bike Path; Re-striping - Storm Drain - Fiber Optic Conduit - Utilities - Sewer & Water - Other UTICA AVENUE: - Curb & Gutter - A.C. Pavement - Sidewalk - Drive Appr. - Street Trees 21. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 259 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval - Signing & Striping - Storm Drain, if applicable - Fiber Optic Conduit - Utilities, if applicable - Sewer & Water, if applicable - Other 7TH STREET: - Curb & Gutter - A.C. Pavement - Sidewalk - Drive Appr. - Streetlight - Street Trees - Signing and Striping - Storm Drain, if applicable - Fiber Optic Conduit - Utilities, if applicable - Sewer & Water, if applicable - Other ADA RAMPS AT THE CORNER OF: - Haven Avenue and 6th Street - Utica Avenue and 6th Street - Utica Ave and 7th Street Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, storm drains, and Signing and Striping shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and /or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, and traffic signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 22. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 260 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Install fiber optic conduit, vaults, and manholes per Standard Drawings 135-137. Public improvement plans shall show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes. 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees : 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 24. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to certificate of occupancy: Haven Ave Utica Ave 6th St 7th St 25. All public improvements ( drainage facilities, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and /or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. 26. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 27. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.28. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 29. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 261 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 30. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 31. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right -of-way shall be dedicated to the City along: Haven Avenue 6th Street Utica Avenue 7th Street 32. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards , at the corners of: Haven Ave and 6th St Utica Ave and 6th St Utica Ave and 7th St 33. The subdivider shall provide a private access easement over Parcel 2, as shown on the tentative map , to ensure legal and physical access for the benefit of adjacent parcels. The easement shall be recorded on the Parcel Map, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 34. www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 262 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall revise the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to include critical volume -to-capacity (V/C) ratios for all study intersections and driveways, in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s TIA Guidelines. Per confirmation with City staff, this requirement applies to all study intersections, not just project driveways. This includes all intersections /driveways located along 6th Street and along Haven Avenue. The applicant shall continue coordination with the City and Transtech to complete the LOS analysis as part of the ongoing traffic study . The project shall also comply with all recommendations provided in the June 13, 2025, letter from California Department of Transportation which is included as part of the project’s environmental documentation. Specifically, the applicant shall provide a Safety Analysis Report for the I -10/Haven Ave interchange and I -15/4th St interchange. The Safety Analysis Report shall follow the attached guidance . Local Development Review (LDR) Safety Review Practitioner Guidance in February 2024. To request crash data on the State Highway System, please submit your request via our California Public Records Act (CPRA) portal following the link (Support Home Page (mycusthelp.com)). Please analyze the existing crash data and discuss the project’s impact on safety as needed . -Perform safety analysis using HSM (Supplement 2014) Chapter 19 for the proposed project in the following conditions: -Existing condition. -Opening year: with and without project. -Horizon year: with and without project. Please provide appropriate countermeasures to reduce project’s safety impact if applicable . If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, they must comply with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards upon project completion. Additionally, the project must ensure the maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the construction phase. These access considerations align with Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users. Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ Right-of-Way (R/W) requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. For information regarding the Encroachment Permit application and submittal requirements, contact: Caltrans Office of Encroachment Permits, 464 West 4th Street, Basement, MS 619, San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400, (909) 383-4526, D8.E-permits@dot.ca.gov, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep Important Note: All permit applications must now be submitted through our CEPS Online Portal at : https://ceps.dot.ca.gov/ 35. www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 263 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): - 33 total feet on 7th Street 36. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval The parcels are required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD 85-1) if they have not yet been annexed into the CFD. Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at (909) 774-2582 or Kelly.Guerra@CityofRC.US to inquire about the annexation status and complete the annexation if needed. The annexation requirement will not be considered complete until the applicant provides proof of annexation or begins the annexation process and Special Districts notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started. 1. Emergency responder communication coverage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-12 is required for the building (s) included in this project. A radio signal strength test of the public safety radio communication system conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 2022 California Fire Code is required to be submitted. Where existing radio signal strength does not meet the requirements of the Fire Code, a separate submittal for an emergency responder communication coverage system is required. 2. High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 4. A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates. 5. A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually operated gate that is installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane). 6. Gates installed across a commercial /industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Release of construction permits issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino will be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 8. www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 264 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is required to be implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of foundation form materials. The Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan is required to be in compliance with Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction permits being approved and issued. 9. Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 11. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 12. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office . 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit . 4. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person /company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden /retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe /heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 6. www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 265 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 7. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross -lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 8. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 9. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities , storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 10. A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for any work within their right -of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 11. If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed and replaced, a Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Engineering Department for additional direction/information. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Engineering Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit . 13. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 15. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 16. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 17. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Engineering Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 19. www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 266 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 20. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 21. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible , and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 22. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property .23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 24. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 25. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 26. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Department. 27. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 28. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”. 29. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations , the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit ; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 30. www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 267 Project #: DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00069, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, DRC2024-00163, SUBTPM20713 Project Name: El Camino Location: 10670 6TH ST - 020941134-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement , Master Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, Tree Removal Permit, Uniform Sign Program ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 31. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 32. www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19Printed: 10/27/2025    Page 268 SMRH:4934-3330-9552.4 A Green Jobs & Clean Communities P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877 October 29, 2025 BY EMAIL Rancho Cucamonga City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Sean McPherson, Principal Planner Email: Sean.McPherson@cityofrc.us Re: Withdrawal of Comment Letter re Lone Oak Rancho Project (File No. DRC2023-00067, DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, SUBTPM20713, and SCH No. 2023080369) Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: On June 11, 2025, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance ("GSEJA") submitted a comment letter (the "GSEJA Comment Letter") to the City regarding the adequacy of the CEQA analysis, and opposing the project approvals for, the construction and operation of a manufacturing, distribution, light industrial, and office facility with respect to City of Rancho Cucamonga File Nos. DRC2023-00067, DRC2023-00068, DRC2023-00070, DRC2023-00072, and SUBTPM20713, and State Clearinghouse No. 2023080369 (the "Project"). The Project is currently scheduled to be heard by the City Council on November 5, 2025. On behalf of GSEJA, I hereby notify you that GSEJA no longer opposes the Project and the applicant has addressed GSEJA's concerns. Therefore, GSEJA hereby withdraws the GSEJA Comment Letter. 2025-11-05 - ITEM G1 - Correspondence Received SMRH:4934-3330-9552.4 A Rancho Cucamonga City Council October 29, 2025 Page 2 Sincerely, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance geoi � D' ector El Camino Project Primary Case File No: DRC2023 -00067 November 5th, 2025 PROJECT BACKGROUND DRC2023-00067 •Who : Lo n e O a k –Ra n c h o , LLC ; •What : A request for entitlements to subdivide parcels and redevelop/ expand an existing beverage distribution center; •Where : 30.1 acres at Haven Ave., 6 th Street, Utica Ave., and 7 th Street (does NOT include 9121 Haven Avenue); •When : •Accepted on March 28, 2023; •Deemed Complete on June 29, 2023; •PC unanimously recommended approval on October 8, 2025 Project Site Zoning General Plan Land Use Northwest from 6th Street and Utica Avenue 9267 Haven Avenue (To be renovated) 9227 Haven Avenue (To be demolished) North from 6th Street 9227 Haven Avenue (To be demolished)9267 Haven Avenue (To be renovated) Looking east across Haven Avenue Looking north along Haven Avenue Looking north along Haven Avenue Proposed Project Project: •Propose a phased redevelopment and expansion of existing beverage distribution facility: Phase 1 includes construction of: •Approx. 959,441 square feet for new “PC/DC/ASRS” and elevated truck deck; •4 -story parking structure; •Maintain and renovate 9267 Haven Avenue office building •Water Well at 6 th Street and Utica Avenue DRC2023-00067 PROPOSED PROJECT Phase 2 includes two options: •Potential re-use of 10655 7 th Street (Phase 2A) •Potential demo and rebuild of new building at 10655 7 th Street (Phase 2B); •Construction and operation of “co -gen” facility; CVWD Water Well DRC2023-00067 DRC2023-00067 8 DRC2023-00067 8 Looking northeast from 6th and Utica Looking northeast from 6th Street Looking northeast from 6th and Utica DRC2023-00067 17 Looking north from 6th Street Looking north from 6th Street DRC2023-00067 8 Looking northeast from 6th Street near Haven Avenue Looking east from Haven Avenue DRC2023-00067 21 Looking north along Haven Avenue Looking east from Haven Avenue Looking south along Haven Avenue frontage DRC2023-00067 8 DRC2023-00067 Design Review •Required to allow construction of proposed project; Master Plan •Establishes site -specific development standards. Legislative action to be approved by City Council; Vesting Tentative Parcel Map •To consolidate project site into 3 lots. Vests project to fees in place project was deemed complete DRC2023-00067 ENTITLEMENTS REQUIRED Conditional Use Permit •For Manufacturing, Light-La r g e w i th distribution/ warehouse component; Tree Removal Permit •To remove onsite trees, including heritage trees. Replacement trees required. Important note The Project application previously included a Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map and Uniform Sign Program. Upon further consideration, the applicant changed to a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and removed the DA and USP. This action has no impact to overall project scope, design or operational characteristics. DRC2023-00067 25 MASTER PLAN •Code establishes master plan process allowing for creation of “site -specific” development standards; •Project involves expansion of existing business which has existed since 1980s and now wishes to expand; •Achieves critical economic development goal of allowing expansion of food and beverage manufacturer; •Unique “campus-style” development makes site-specific development standards necessary Regarding the Master Plan, applicant proposes site -specific development standards for the following: DRC2023-00067 ENTITLEMENTS REQUIRED (Cont.) •Building Typology •Building Facades •Building Articulation •Ground Floor Entrances and Treatments •Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions •Build -to -Line and Frontage Areas •Parking Standards •Bicycle Parking •Signage •Open Space Standards •Walls and Fences •Per State CEQA Guidelines, An EIR was prepared for this project (SCH2023080369) and FEIR provided to commentors on October 24, 2025 •Even with mitigation, Project results in significant and unavoidable impacts to SCAQMD thresholds for NOx plus greenhouse gas exceedance; •Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for Council consideration. DRC2023-00067 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW •Correspondence received from Advocates for the Environment challenging various aspect of environmental document; •Staff has prepared responses to these challenges which have been provided to the Council for the record; •In summary, staff maintains original findings that the EIR was sufficiently thorough and accurate in its analysis and findings. DRC2023-00067 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Cont.) As required, this item was advertised as follows: •Published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on October 22, 2025; •Notices mailed to property owners and interested parties on October 23, 2025; •The project site was also posted with physical notices on October 22, 2025; •Staff has received correspondence which has been provided to Council. DRC2023-00067 NOTICING RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission approve Resolution 2025 -032, recommending that the City Council approve the project, subject to the Conditions of Approval. DRC2023-00067 El Camino Development Rancho Cucamonga, CA 4 Production Lines SKUs 700+ Our New Combo Center in Rancho Cucamonga, anticipated to open in 2027, is the largest infrastructure investment our company has ever made. 630,000 Sq Ft facility situated on 32 acres 30 M Produced Cases Employees 500+ 20 M Delivered Cases 4 K Accounts $600M Invested 110 New Jobs Onsite solar and CoGeneration Top water steward in Coke system Low emissions with Nitrogen, Ambient Filling & Electric Vehicles Interactive tour experience CREATING VALUE FOR OUR LOCAL COMMUNITIES New jobs, property taxes Flexible production plans with room for growth Local economic growth Community partnerships CREATING ECONOMIC VALUE FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA $600M invested, 110 new jobs Efficient, block-cell line layout to minimize travel Training and conference space Event spaces, covered parking, EV Charging, fitness center CREATING VALUE FOR OUR EMPLOYEES Our Vision: Be the leader in the beverage business by delivering unmatched value to our employees, customers, and local communities Master Planned Campus 4-Story Parking Garage Near EntranceEngaging Environment Employee Gathering HallEmployee Amenities Training & Meeting Spaces Tour Experience to educate community on our business, our facility and our commitment to sustainability Support and partner Continue to support and partner with local community organizations through volunteer and donations. Best-In-Class WURLow Emissions Footprint •Nitrogen Generation •Ambient Filling •Product made closer to point of demand. •8 Electric Vehicles & EV Charging for Employees •Solar & Quad Gen •State of the art filling technology. •VSEP Water Recovery System. •Adiabatic Coolers •Plant engineered to collect and re-use water By the time Rancho opens, we will have replenished two years of our water needs back into the aquifer Recycling Center To achieve our zero waste to landfill target Recycled PET Bottles produced in Rancho will contain PET that was already recycled 2+MW Solar Of rooftop solar, creating a low emissions footprint while relieving the grid Quad Gen Onsite power, where carbon is captured and used for production. Low Energy & Emissions Site Aesthetics Traffic & Commuting Energy Use: •Advanced energy metering and controls to optimize power use. •100% LED lighting throughout the interior and exterior of the building. •Daylighting in admin spaces to reduce lighting loads and provide natural light. •Solar 2 MW+ of onsite Solar •Quad Gen generate 3 MW of power onsite. Emissions: •20% of materials sourced within 500 mi radius of site. •Refrigerant management in production space along with CO2 based system. •Target of 50% recycled content in core and shell materials. •100% electric MHE fleet in distribution and production facility operations. •8 ZEV Tractors in distribution fleet with plans for future additions Indoor: •Indoor air quality performance standards. •Acoustic performance strategies to increase sound absorption and reducing sound travel from production areas. •Wellness room & fitness center to support team members physical & mental health. Outdoor: •Reduced heat island effect by installing white/cool roof, reflective paving and additional trees for shading. •On-site stormwater retention in underground tanks reducing the site’s impact on existing stormwater systems. •Perimeter screen wall will include greenscape features and drought resistant plantings. •Providing access to open spaces for employees and pedestrians to enjoy. Electric Vehicle Charging: •Employees & Guests (50+ spaces) •Fleet tractors that service Rancho •Service vehicles vans Commuting: •Public transit access from new bus stop on Haven Street/ 6th Street area. •Alternative transportation including bike storage, employee showers, rideshare parking and EV spaces. •Covered Parking in 95% of parking spaces. •Tractor Idling Program limits idling at onsite. Industrial: •Network re-alignment reduces Southern California Miles Driven per year. •Onsite generation of CO2 and Nitrogen reduces daily deliveries needed. Positions in the first 3 years. 500-600 Employment Economic Growth Partnerships Construction Benefits: Several hundred trades and suppliers on site from late 2025 through 2028. Developing partnership with local businesses in Rancho to bring economic value during project. Investment in Utility and Infrastructure Improvements. Ongoing Increase in property taxes. Improved public aesthetics and maintenance along 6th St & Haven Avenue: Public Art, Bus Terminal, Pocket Parks. Donations & Volunteering Events: Steps for Vets, Red Cross Blood Drive, Ronald McDonald, Sheriff’s Rodeo, Annual Hiring Fair… Partners: 350 Jobs returning from Fontana, CA. Union and skilled trade roles. Training and development programs. New jobs at the opening of Rancho to support technical functions. 100+ Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff’s Department Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 53 5k+$68K+345 Community activations Cases donated Supplies and in-kind donations Volunteer hours Career Opportunities: Presence in Community Inland Empire Economic Partnership Since January 2024: Thank you! Look forward to continuing our partnership with the Rancho Cucamonga community. 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org Advocates for the Environment A non-profit public-interest law firm and environmental advocacy organization October 28, 2025 Sean McPherson, Principal Planner Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Via U.S. Mail and email to Sean.McPherson@cityofrc.us Re: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report for El Camino Project, SCH No. 2023080369 Dear Mr. McPherson: On June 12, 2025, Advocates for the Environment submitted a comment letter regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the El Camino project (Project). The Project Site is located in the southern area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), in southwestern San Bernardino County. The Project proposes to develop the 30.1-acre Project Site by constructing up to 1,054,541 square-feet of new manufacturing, light industrial, and office spaces across two construction phases. We have also reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), prepared in October 2025, and submit additional comments regarding the sufficiency of the DEIR’s Greenhouse-Gas (GHG) analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The comments in this letter are intended to supplement, but not replace, the comments in our original comment letter. The DEIR’s GHG Analysis Violates CEQA The unmitigated project-related emissions for the first phase are 29,821.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year (DEIR, p. 4.8-28.) The yearly unmitigated emissions from the second phase are expected to be 43,898.9 MTCO2e without thermal recovery, or 41,126.0 MTCO2e with thermal recovery. The City adopted the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) numerical GHG threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year for industrial projects. (DEIR, p. 4.8-22.) This is an invalid threshold, as discussed below. But, based on this threshold, the City determined the project would have a significant and unavoidable impact even after mitigation measures. After mitigation efforts, the total emissions calculated still greatly exceeds the threshold. The two proposed GHG mitigation measures would only reduce the Project’s GHG emissions by about 150 MTCO2e per year, representing about 2% of the Project’s annual emissions. (DEIR, p. 4.8-31.) The City also references air quality mitigation measures for reducing vehicle emissions, but this still only would reduce less than 100 MTCO2e, representing a mere 0.4% of 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org mobile source emissions reductions. The City did not demonstrate that these mitigation measures represent the maximum feasible mitigation of the Project’s significant GHG impact. Under CEQA, the City is required to include all feasible mitigation measures, which were not incorporated here. The City offered Mitigation Measures GHG-1, which would reduce GHG emissions from appliance energy consumption; and GHG-2, which would reduce GHG emissions from building energy consumption. Additionally, Mitigation Measures AIR-3 through AIR-5 were cross-referenced from the Air Quality section of the DEIR because of their potential co-benefits of reducing carbon emissions. (DEIR, p. 4.8-31.) Yet, the City acknowledged that the impact of the air quality mitigation measures would have minimal effect on the overall GHG impact of the Project. The City determined that the Project’s GHG impact would be significant and unavoidable, without providing substantial evidence that the mitigation measures included in the DEIR represented the only feasible mitigation measures for reducing the significant GHG impact. There are other feasible mitigation measures that the City should have considered and adopted to reduce the significant GHG impact identified in the DEIR. The DEIR should have included more mitigation to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to the extent required by CEQA. The City’s GHG analysis improperly relied upon SCAQMD’s recommendation SCAQMD adopted the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold (the Threshold) in 2009 based on the December 5, 2008 staff proposal. (the Staff Proposal).1 A single-sheet summary of SCAQMD’s Air Quality Significance Thresholds was posted in March 2023,2 and includes the purported GHG threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/year for industrial facilities, without citation sources, despite citing references for the other standards (e.g., SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, AQMD Rules 1303 and 403.) So, it can be assumed that the Staff Proposal is therefore the only available authority supporting the Threshold. The City failed to independently analyze or support for why the SCAQMD GHG threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/year is valid for this Project. It is inadequate for the Project because: • the SCAQMD lacks the authority to set CEQA thresholds for projects for which it is not the lead agency; • the rationale the SCAQMD used to establish the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold is not applicable to the Project; and • the City does not provide substantial evidence supporting the Threshold in the DEIR. 1 http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ghg-significance-thresholds - Board Letter and attachments 2 https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/south-coast-aqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org The SCAQMD has no authority to set CEQA thresholds for other agencies The DEIR assumes, without explanation, that the Threshold is applicable to the Project. But SCAQMD’s enabling statute (Health & Safety Code §§ 40400-40540) does not provide legal authority to the agency to issue CEQA regulations or thresholds for other agencies. The CEQA Guidelines § 15064.7(b) encourages each agency to develop thresholds of significance for itself to use but provides no authority for the SCAQMD to develop CEQA thresholds for other agencies to use. The Board Letter for the December 5, 2008 SCAQMD Board meeting,3 drafted by SCAQMD staff but not adopted by the Board, proposes a 10,000 MTCO2e threshold which is applicable only to industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency under CEQA. (Board Letter, p. 5.) Thus, the creation of this threshold was intended for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The SCAQMD does not have the authority to prescribe significance thresholds for which it is not the lead agency. Lead agencies may choose their own significance thresholds, but they must be supported by substantial evidence, which means “facts, reasonable assumptions predicated on facts, and expert opinion supported by facts.” (14 CCR § 15064.7(b).) The burden is on the City to provide substantial evidence for the chosen threshold for the Project, not merely adopting a recommendation. The City cannot rely on the SCAQMD’s evidence supporting the threshold because the evidence that the SCAQMD used is not only insufficient to provide substantial evidence but also does not apply to this Project. Furthermore, it makes no sense for different thresholds to apply in the various air districts; global warming is a global phenomenon, and a ton of GHGs emitted in Los Angeles has the same impact as a ton emitted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Other districts have adopted much lower thresholds, such as the 1,100 MTCO2e threshold recommended by the Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District,4 or the County of San Bernardino’s 3,000 MTCO2e per year screening level.5 The DEIR did not explain why the Threshold is more appropriate for the Project than these lower thresholds adopted by other air districts. The SCAQMD’s rationale for the threshold is not valid for this Project The SCAQMD’s rationale for adopting its 10,000 MTCO2e numerical threshold does not apply to this Project. The SCAQMD’s recommendation is based on the rationale that it would reduce 3 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/ghgboardsynopsis.pdf 4 See Greenhouse Gas Thresholds for Sacramento County, SMAQMD https://www.airquality.org/LandUseTransportation/Documents/SMAQMDGHGThresholds2020-03-04v2.pdf 5 See County of San Bernadino Greenhouse Gas Emissions Development Review Process Screening Tables, available at: https://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LUS/GreenhouseGas/GHG_2021/GHG%20Revised%20Screening%20Tables%20 -%20Adopted%209-20-2021.pdf City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org 90% of emissions from projects for which the SCAQMD is the lead agency. To arrive at the threshold, SCAQMD reviewed the natural-gas consumption for projects it permitted in 2006 and 2007, assuming the vast majority of emissions came from burning natural gas. These tend to be heavy industrial projects such as manufacturers of cement and steel. The SCAQMD is not a lead agency for land use projects generally, which include “shopping malls, housing tracts, commercial or industrial parks, sports stadiums, etc.”6 The kinds of projects for which the SCAQMD is the lead agency are different from commercial or warehousing projects, which are typically much smaller. The vast majority of GHG emissions from warehouse projects come from mobile emissions, not the burning of natural gas, as is the case for this Project. While reducing emissions to below 10,000 MTCO2e might achieve 90% emissions reductions for large industrial projects for which the SCAQMD is the lead agency, the mix of land-use projects in general, and warehouse projects in particular is very different from the mix of projects the SCAQMD analyzed. There is no support that a 10,000 MTCO2e threshold would capture 90% of GHG emissions for projects of this size, scope, and use. The City failed to support its chosen threshold with substantial evidence CEQA requires the City to support its choice of threshold with substantial evidence. The City has information available to determine an applicable significance threshold and support it with substantial evidence given the current regulatory setting and project features. Instead of doing so, the City improperly relied on an inapplicable threshold that does not conform to California’s most recent climate goals. CEQA requires that significance determinations are based on current regulations, as well as scientific and factual data. (CEQA Guidelines §§ 15064.4(b).) Thresholds that are not aligned with California’s current reduction goals are outdated under CEQA. The chosen threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e adopted by the SCAQMD does not address Senate Bill 32 (SB 32). The implementation of SB 32 is carried out by the California Air Resources Board’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017 Scoping Plan), which reflects SB 32’s GHG emissions reduction goal of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. To assess statewide implementation of this goal, the 2017 Scoping Plan created a per-capita target of 6 MTCO2e by 2030 (2017 Scoping Plan, p. 99.) 6 https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/frequently-asked- questions#:~:text=The%20South%20Coast%20AQMD%20typically,previously%20undergone%20a%20CEQA%20analy sis. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org Here, even after implementation of the mitigation measure, the Project’s emissions would be approximately 6.63 MTCO2e per service population,7 exceeding the target necessary to achieve SB 32’s goal as reflected in the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan. Only two of California’s air districts (Bay Area and Sacramento) have created thresholds which address SB 32’s reduction goal of GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. 8 All the other thresholds adopted by air quality management districts, including the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold recommended for industrial projects by the SCAQMD, are not consistent with current environmental policy in California. Consequently, the SCAQMD guidelines are not aligned with California’s current regulatory scheme and therefore the 10,000 MTCO2e numerical threshold is an outdated threshold not supported by substantial evidence. Further, the Threshold is invalid because it is not aligned with the most recent goals of the California Air Resources Board (CARB). CARB developed the 2022 Scoping Plan, which emphasizes that “any delays in action or insufficient action are a threat to public health and the environment.” (2022 Scoping Plan, p. 22.) It also specifies that all of the actions in the 2022 Scoping Plan are necessary to achieve climate goals. (2022 Scoping Plan, p. 11.) Accordingly, if the Project inhibits any of the specified actions in the 2022 Scoping Plan from being carried out without delay, then it will be inconsistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan. A numeric threshold, particularly one as large as 10,000 MTCO2e, does not require that any certain measures are achieved. Therefore, staying under the threshold would not mean that the Project would necessarily adhere to the measures in the 2022 Scoping Plan in a timely manner. Consistency with Identified Applicable Plans The City chose to analyze, as one of its adopted significance thresholds, whether the Project would “[c]onflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.” (DEIR, p. 4.8-21.) The DEIR included a discussion of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2022 Scoping Plan, Title 24 BEES and CalGreen Code, CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan, Connect SoCal 2024, and the Rancho Cucamonga Climate Action Plan (CAP), to support its determination that the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for GHG emissions reductions. This significance analysis violates CEQA by erroneously overlooking the Project’s conflict with the 2022 Scoping Plan, and particulary in relation to the cogeneration system. 7 9,949 𝑀𝑇𝐶𝑂2𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 ÷ 1,500 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠=6.63 𝑀𝑇𝐶𝑂2𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎. Employee estimate obtained from CEQAnet Project page, available at https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2023100540/3. Last accessed July 15, 2025. 8 See California Air Resources Board 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, Appendix D, p. 26, footnote 67. [noting that the only air quality districts that are in alignment with SB 32 are the recommendations from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District]. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/2022-sp-appendix-d-local-actions.pdf. Last accessed July 14, 2025. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org Cogeneration system conflicts with the 2022 Scoping Plan. The Project would involve expanding an existing beverage distribution facility, which the City incorrectly claims would not conflict with the 2022 Scoping Plan. The 2022 Scoping Plan establishes a sector-by-sector roadmap for California to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 or earlier through an aggressive approach to decarbonize every sector of the economy.9 (2022 CARB Scoping Plan executive summary, p. 1) The plan recognizes that buildings, including commercial ones, must transition away from reliance on fossil fuels and should predominantly rely on advancing energy efficiency while replacing gas with non-combustion alternatives so commercial buildings do not require ongoing maintenance for gas delivery. (2022 CARB Scoping Plan, p. 212.) However, this Project includes a cogeneration system that “would reduce the quantity of natural gas required by the boilers for water-heating and beverage-production purposes.” (DEIR, p. 2-1, 3- 47.) Though framed as an efficiency measure that reduces natural gas consumption in the boilers, the system itself operates through the combustion of natural gas. (DEIR, p. 4.3-38.) In effect, the system substitutes one source of fossil fuel combustion for another, introducing new long-term combustion infrastructure while claiming a reduction in GHG emissions. This justification conflicts with the 2022 Scoping Plans’ objectives to transition facilities away from fossil fuels altogether. While the 2022 Scoping Plan recognizes that some industrial processes may currently face cost or feasibility barriers to full electrification, it nonetheless establishes a clear long-term objective to decarbonize industrial facilities by “displacing fossil fuel use with a mix of electrification, solar thermal heat, biomethane, low- or zero-carbon hydrogen, and other low-carbon fuels to provide energy for heat and reduce combustion emissions.” (2022 CARB Scoping Plan, p. 207.) Understanding that “there is a continuing demand for fossil gas due to lack of non-combustion technologically feasible or cost-effective alternatives for certain industrial sectors.” (2022 CARB Scoping Plan, p. 207.) The Project is not consistent with this goal, based on the analysis provided in the DEIR. Its reliance on fossil fuels through the use of cogeneration systems that include natural gas combustion alongside boilers creates a direct conflict. (DEIR, p. 4.6-31.) Although the 2022 Scoping Plan understands there may be a continuing demand for fossil fuels in certain sectors, it does not treat the use of natural gas combustion as a preferred or encouraged energy source, nor does it treat the Project sectors as one that requires fossil fuels. The 2022 Scoping Plan emphasizes that “electrification and solar thermal heat are best-suited to industrial processes that have relatively low heat requirements, such as food processors, paper mills, and industries that use low-pressure steam in their processes,” and identifies approaches such as replacing fossil gas boilers with electric boilers and using industrial electric heat pumps (2022 CARB 9 2022 Scoping Plan Executive Summary p. 1 located at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/2022-sp- es.pdf City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 CEQA Comments on the El Camino Project October 28, 2025 10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040 (818) 650-0030 X101 dw@aenv.org Scoping Plan, p. 208). A beverage manufacturing facility falls within this category of industrial processes for which electrification is feasible. In contrast, the Scoping Plan limits continued onsite combustion to “industrial processes that require higher-temperature heat,” such as steel forging, glass manufacturing, and cement production industries with technological barriers to electrification (2022 CARB Scoping Plan, p. 208.) The DEIR’s implication that cogeneration is appropriate because of general “cost barriers” misconstrues this distinction. (DEIR Admin Draft, p. 2-137.) Those barriers do not justify new fossil fuel combustion at facilities that are otherwise well-suited for electrification. By proposing a new natural gas combusting cogeneration system at a beverage facility, the Project would perpetuate fossil fuel dependence in a sector the Scoping Plan identifies as capable of transitioning to clean energy, thereby conflicting with the Plan’s decarbonization framework and long-term goals. Consequently, because the Project is inconsistent with applicable plans for the reduction of GHGs, it is significant under the second threshold. The City’s determination that the Project would have a less-than-significant impact as to the second GHG threshold is not supported by substantial evidence. Conclusion The Project would have a significant GHG impact under the chosen threshold of consistency with applicable plans because the Project is not consistent with the applicable plans, policies, and regulations for the reduction of GHGs. Please put Advocates for the Environment on the list of interested parties to receive updates about the progress of this potential project approval. We make this request under Public Resources Code, section 21092.2. Sincerely, Dean Wallraff, Attorney at Law Executive Director, Advocates for the Environment MIG, Inc. November 2025 Memorandum To: Sean McPherson, Principal Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga CC: Kent Norton, MIG From: Kasey Kitowski, MIG and Chris Dugan, ESA Re: Response to Advocates for the Environment’s October 2025 Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report for El Camino Project, SCH No. 2023080369 Date: November 4, 2025 MIG, Inc. has prepared this memorandum to respond to the comments submitted by Advocates for the Environment on October 28, 2025, regarding the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the El Camino Project (Project). Response to CEQA Comments Comment 1: The DEIR’s GHG Analysis Violates CEQA The commenter provides an accurate summary of the EIR and unsubstantiated claims that the EIR’s conclusion of signiflcant and unavoidable GHG impacts was incorrect. In addition, the commenter generally claims that EIR did not incorporate all feasible mitigation measures and that there are other feasible mitigation measure the City should considered to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions; however, the commenter does not provide any speciflc mitigation suggestion or recommendation for the City to consider. In contrast, as described in the DEIR, the Project includes design features and the DEIR incorporates mitigation to address GHG emissions from nearly all of the Project’s GHG emissions sources, including construction GHG emissions, building envelope and systems GHG emissions, appliance GHG emissions, passenger vehicle and truck trip emissions, and commercial and industrial yard equipment GHG emissions. The FEIR also evaluated and explained its conclusions on the feasibility of additional measures recommended by Advocates for the Environment in its flrst comment letter, as well as measures recommended by the Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE), and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The EIR incorporated all feasible mitigation measures. Comment 2: The City’s GHG analysis improperly relied upon SCAQMD’s recommendation 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Response to Correspondence Received - Item G1 MIG, Inc. November 2025 The commenter incorrectly claims that the City failed to support why the SCAQMD 10,000 MT CO2e/year threshold was appropriate for the Project. Refer to the “Discussion of Potential GHG Emissions Thresholds of Signiflcance” under Section 4.8.3 of the DEIR for a detailed analysis and justiflcation on the use of this threshold to evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions impacts. Comment 3: The SCAQMD has no authority to set CEQA thresholds for other agencies The commenter incorrectly implies that the SCAQMD set the CEQA threshold or issued some other CEQA regulation for the proposed Project. As discussed in Section 4.8.3 of the EIR, the City reviewed potential GHG thresholds and selected the 10,000 MT CO 2e/year threshold as the most appropriate for the proposed Project. It is permissible under CEQA for a lead agency to choose a threshold formulated by a local air district. In fact, Appendix G of the 2025 CEQA Guidelines states (page 363, “Where available, the signiflcance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations”). The commenter also suggests additional thresholds for consideration that were not discussed in the DEIR. The City has reviewed these thresholds and determined they are not appropriate for the Project. The SCAQMD’s 10,000 MTCO2e threshold would instead be used for the Project because it is a stationary source project. The commenter referenced the Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) as having a lower threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e. However, in the document referenced by the commenter, the SMAQMD recommends this 1,100 MTCO2e as a construction and land use operational threshold, but has a 10,000 MTCO2e stationary sources operational threshold (page 1). Additionally, as mentioned by the commenter, the San Bernardino County threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is a screening threshold. It was developed based speciflcally on the San Bernardino County GHG Emissions Reduction Plan , so that small projects that do not exceed the screening threshold could be considered consistent with the plan (County of San Bernardino page 1). This threshold is not applicable to the proposed Project. The GHG reduction plan applicable to the Project, the Rancho Cucamonga CAP, is not eligible to streamline the analysis for the proposed Project, as explained in Section 4.8.3 . After reviewing the information provided by the commenter, the City affirms that the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold used in the DEIR is the appropriate threshold that is supported by substantial evidence. Comment 4: The SCAQMD’s rationale for the threshold is not valid for this Project The commenter claims that the SCAMQD’s threshold does not apply to the proposed Project. The commenter notes that the SCAQMD arrived at the threshold by reviewing MIG, Inc. November 2025 natural gas consumption for permitted projects, and clarifles that the SCAQMD is not the lead agency for land uses including shopping malls, housing tracts, commercial or industrial parks, sports stadiums, etc. The proposed Project is not any of these land use types. The proposed Project is a beverage manufacturing facility that includes stationary sources that would combust natural gas. The commenter also claims that the SCAQMD’s recommendation is based on reducing 90% of emissions from projects. As a poin t of clariflcation, as discussed in the SCAQMD’s Draft Guidance Document-Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Signiflcance Threshold, the 90% emission capture rate refers to capturing 90% of total emissions from all new or modifled stationary source projects, and not reducing 90% of emissions from projects. The EIR evaluated issues of threshold applicability in Section 4.8.3 and concluded that the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold was appropriate for the proposed Project. Finally, the SCAQMD submitted detailed a detailed comment letter, and did not comment with any issues on the applicability of the threshold they developed. Comment 5: The City failed to support its chosen threshold with substantial evidence The commenter claims that the EIR uses a GHG threshold that does not align with current climate goals, and that a numeric threshold does not guarantee that all actions under the Scoping Plan would be achieved. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 establishes that the determination of the signiflcance of a project’s GHG emissions requires careful judgement and a good-faith effort to describe or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency may prepare a quantitative or a qualitative analysis of GHG emissions; however, the analysis should focus on a project’s reasonably foreseeable change in GHG emissions, for an appropriate timeframe, and with consideration of evolving scientiflc knowledge and state regulatory schemes. When determining the signiflcance of a project’s GHG emissions impact, a lead agency should consider factors such as, but not limited to, the potential increase or decrease in GHG emissions compared to a project’s existing env ironmental setting, whether a project’s GHG emissions exceed threshold of signiflcance determined to apply, and the extent to which a project complies with regulations or requirements in an adopted statewide, regional, or local plan for reducing or mitigating GHG emissions, provided such requirements were adopted in a public review process and reduce or mitigate a project’s incremental GHG emissions contribution to cumulative climate change effects. The City is not required to establish a threshold for GHG emissions impacts based on the actions in the Scoping Plan. However, an evaluation of consistency with the Scoping Plan is still provided in the EIR, under the Applicable GHG Plans, Policies, and Regulations discussion in Section 4.8.5. The analysis concluded that the Project would not confiict with MIG, Inc. November 2025 plans and policies such as the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (BEES) and CalGreen Code, the Sustainable Freight Action Plan, and the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Comment 6: Consistency with Identifled Applicable Plans The commenter accurately stated that the DEIR included a discussion of CARB’s 2022 Scoping Plan, Title 24 BEES and CalGreen Code, CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan, Connect SoCal 2024, and the Rancho Cucamonga Climate Action Plan (CAP) to support its determination that the Project would not confiict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for GHG emissions reductions. The commenter then incorrectly claims that the proposed Project confiicts with the 2022 Scoping Plan. Refer to Section 4.8.5 of the EIR for a detailed evaluation of the Project’s consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan. Cogeneration System Confiicts with the 2022 Scoping Plan The commenter expresses disagreement with the EIR’s conclusion that the proposed Project would not confiict with the 2022 Scoping Plan. However, this disagreement does not constitute substantial evidence that the DEIR’s analysis is erroneous or deflcient, nor does it constitute evidence that the Project would, in fact, have a substantial confiict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions. The commenter provides a misleading introduction of the Scoping Plan by providing a quote from the Executive Summary that the Scoping Plan would achieve carbon neutrality by decarbonizing every sector of the economy without context. Earlier in the Executive Summary, the Scoping Plan announces its target of reducing anthropogenic emissions to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045 (page 1). The Scoping Plan would not achieve carbon neutrality in every sector; instead it would reduce but not eliminate carbon em issions while carbon sequestration from natural and working lands and carbon removal technology would address remaining emissions. As the commenter notes, the Scoping Plan recognizes some industrial processes may currently face cost or feasibility barriers to full electriflcation (page 207). Furthermore, as analyzed in the EIR, there would be GHG beneflts from the cogeneration system. The cogeneration system would substantially reduce building energy GHG emissions (from approximately 7,663 MTCO2e per year in Phase 1 to 4,504 MTCO2e per year in Phase 2). Additionally, the cogeneration’s CO2 recovery system would capture and purify CO2 generated by the combustion of natural gas in the cogeneration system, creating beverage-grade CO2 for Project use, which could recover approximately 9,362 metric tons and 11,364 metric tons of CO2 per year. The CO2 recovery system would also prevent the MIG, Inc. November 2025 need for between 702 and 852 annual heavy -heavy-duty truck trips that would otherwise need to deliver beverage-grade CO 2 to the Project site, generating CO2 emissions from truck trips. The proposed Project also works towards carbon neutral electriflcation by including solar PV generation and a battery energy storage system, all-electric yard handing equipment, EV charging, and a portion of electric heavy-duty trucks. Thus, the Project would include strategies to electrify manufacturing processes well ahead of the timeline considered by the 2022 Scoping Pan. Finally, CARB, the agency authorized by the legislature to prepare the Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan page 23), provided a detailed comment letter for the proposed Project, and did not comment that there were any fiaws in the analysis of the Project’s consistency with CARB’s 2022 Scoping Plan. References California Air Resources Board 2022.2022 Scoping Plan. November 2022. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/flles/2022-12/2022-sp_1.pdf South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2008. Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Signiflcance Threshold. October 2008. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases- (ghg)-ceqa-signiflcance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=812cf961_2 Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) 2020. Greenhouse Gas Thresholds for Sacramento County. https://www.airquality.org/LandUseTransportation/Documents/SMAQMDGHGThres holds2020-03-04v2.pdf County of San Bernardino 2015. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Development Review Process. March 2015https://lus.sbcounty.gov/wp- content/uploads/sites/48/GreenhouseGas/FinalGHGUpdate.pdf November 5th, 2025 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Letter of Support for Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s Project Dear Mayor Michael and City Councilmembers, As Executive Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, I am pleased to express our enthusiastic support for the El Camino Project. This development represents an important investment in the future of our city and is fully aligned with our mission to support business growth and community prosperity. Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling has long been a valued member of the Rancho Cucamonga business community. Beyond being a major employer, they have consistently demonstrated a deep commitment to community service and local partnerships. Their engagement with local nonprofits, schools, and civic groups highlights their role as not just a business partner, but as a true community partner. The El Camino Project will generate new economic activity, provide meaningful employment opportunities, and strengthen Rancho Cucamonga’s position as a vibrant place to live and work. We believe this project will positively impact both local businesses and residents for years to come. We strongly encourage your recommendation of approval of the El Camino Project and look forward to seeing its benefits realized throughout our community. Heather Rawlings-Polk, Executive Director Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce EXECUTIVE BOARD PRESIDENT DAN DECKER BRUSTER'S REAL ICE CREAM IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT MARK GUIRGUIS HOME MASTERS INTL. PRESIDENT ELECT RHONDA KELIIPIO SPARROWLILY REALTY TREASURER JACK MANSOUR INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN SECRETARY ANDY CARLSON EDW ARD JONES GENERAL COUNSEL ROBERT HUFNAGEL RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. AMY WENSLOW PRODUCTS TO PROFITS ARLETTE GARIBAY ONTARIO CONVENTION CENTER- GOCAL DAN DISCHNER AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ERNESTO RIVERA REYES COCA-COLA BOTTLING ERNIE BRAUNWALDER ERNIE BR AUNWALDER-BRAUNWALDER INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES JASON BLANCHARD LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH JENNIFER GARCIA NEWLINE FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SOLUTIONS MELBA REY CHINO COMMERCIAL BANK MOHAMED FELO TEAMLOGIC IT NICK PAEZ IE MASTERMIND GROUP RICHARD SARPONG KAISER PERMANENTE RIGO ESPINOZA RAW KITCHEN & CANTINA THEODORE FIAWOO M ODERN WOODMEN FRATERNAL FINANCIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS Rancho Chamber Leadership Rancho Chamber Leadership 2025 - 2026 RANCHO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 9500 CLEVELAND AVE. SUITE 110 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 909.987.1012 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 11/03/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Lone Oak - El Camino Project Dear Members of the Council, On behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters, I am writing to express our strong support for the Lone Oak- El Camino Project which will be considered at the City Council meeting on November 5, 2025. Our union has deep roots in Rancho Cucamonga and throughout San Bernardino County. We are proud to represent hardworking members who live right here in the city, men and women who are raising families, and contributing to the community every day. We believe the project reflects a shared commitment to responsible growth and community partnership by contributing to strengthening the city’s future. It will create good-paying local jobs and provide lasting benefits that families can rely on for years to come. It is a project that our members—your neighbors will be directly involved in building. Additionally, this state-of-the-art facility features an excellent design concept that will complement and integrate beautifully with the city’s existing architectural theme. We respectfully urge the City Council to approve the Lone Oak - El Camino Project and continue fostering a city where working families can live, work, and thrive. Thank you for your leadership and for considering our voice in this important decision. With respect and appreciation, Jacob Lopez Regional Manager Western States Regional Council of Carpenters CC: Rafael Legido 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 17495 HURLEY STREET EAST lronworkers Local 433 International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers A.F.l.-C.1.O. Established 1929 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91744 PHONE: (626) 964-2500 FAX: (626) 964-1919 keith@ironworkers433.org KEITH HARKEY Business Manager Financial Secretary-Treasurer City of Rancho Cucamonga Honorable Mayor and City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REF: Support for the Proposed El Camino Project Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council, On behalf of Ironworkers Local 433, I am writing to express our enthusiastic support for the proposed El Camino Project. Ironworkers Local 433 is committed to protecting the rights of its members, promoting safe job sites, and securing fair wages and benefits. We offer a world-class apprenticeship program, ongoing training opportunities, and a unified voice that fights for fair compensation, strong labor standards, and safe working conditions. Given this mission, we are proud to continue supporting the proposed project. The Applicant has made commitments that ensure the local skilled construction workforce, including our members in Rancho Cucamonga, will benefit from the project. That commitment represents the kind of responsible corporate stewardship that will protect the health and well-being of residents and ensure continued opportunities for growth and development in the city. On behalf of our robust membership, we ask that you vote to approve this project and open the doors of economic opportunities for thousands of your residents. Sincerely, Keith Harkey Business Manager Ironworkers local 433 November 4, 2025          11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 California Arizona Hawaii Nevada President David Osborne District Representatives Erik Schmidli Victor Lopez Field Representative Jonathan Paramo Executive Council Local Union 75 Jason Sangster Local Union 118 Troy Arntson Local Union 155 Jesus Castaneda Local Union 229 Beau Coleman Local Union 377 Charles Hernandez Local Union 378 Jason Gallia Local Union 416 Frankie Jimenez Local Union 433 Keith Harkey Local Union 625 Joe O’Donnell Local Union 855 Jonathan Paramo District Council of Iron Workers of the State of California and Vicinity 3281 E. Guasti Rd., Suite 625, Ontario, CA 91761 Telephone (510) 724-9277 November 4, 2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga Honorable Mayor and City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Letter of Support for Proposed El Camino Project Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council, I am writing on behalf of District Council of Ironworkers of California and Vicinity to express our strong support for the proposed El Camino project. This project represents an important opportunity to strengthen our local economy, create high-quality jobs, and continue the City’s commitment to responsible growth and development. A key aspect of this project is its commitment to ensure that local union construction workers will benefit from fair wages, strong safety standards, and excellent training through established apprenticeship programs. Union-built projects not only uphold the highest standards of craftsmanship and safety, but also reinvest in the community by supporting local families and the regional workforce. We also support the project because it’s design and operational plans demonstrate a thoughtful approach to environmental stewardship, traffic management, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Therefore, I respectfully urge the City Council to approve this project and allow it to move forward. Rancho Cucamonga will benefit from the quality jobs, economic investment, and community stability this union-built facility will bring. Thank you for your consideration of this important project. Very truly yours, Davis S. Osborne President            13830 San Antonio Dr., Norwalk, CA 90650 • (562) 868-1251 960 Wigwam Pkwy., Suite 130, Henderson, NV 89014 • (702) 434-7416 www.ironworkers416.org International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Ironworkers Local Union 416 11/4/2025 City of Rancho Cucamonga Honorable Mayor and City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Support Letter for the Proposed El Camino Project Dear Honorable Mayor L. Dennis Michael and Honorable Members of the City Council, Iron Workers Local 416 proudly supports the El Camino Project. We supported the project at the Planning Commission and continue to do so in the firm belief that it is a great project for Rancho Cucamonga. The modernization of this manufacturing and distribution site means union careers with family- sustaining wages, healthcare, and pensions. These are benefits that ripple through local small businesses, schools, and neighborhoods. In addition, by utilizing contractors who employ apprentices from state- approved programs, the project will train the next generation of craftworkers in a true earn-while-you- learn model. The El Camino Project is precisely the kind of private-sector investment cities strive to attract: it is transformative, it is accountable to labor standards, and it builds long-term capacity for regional prosperity. We respectfully urge your approval. Sincerely, Frankie Jimenez Business Manager/ Financial Secretary-Treasurer             11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 Special Olympics Southern California 1600 Forbes Way, Suite 200, Long Beach, CA 90810 Tel 562.502.1100 | www.sosc.org Created by Joseph P. Kennedy Jr. Foundation. Authorized and accredited by Special Olympics, Inc for the benefit of persons with intellectual disabilities. November 5, 2025 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Acknowledgment of Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s Community Partnership Dear Mayor Michael and City Councilmembers, On behalf of Special Olympics Southern California (SOSC), I am pleased to share our appreciation for Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling and their longstanding partnership with our organization. As an organization dedicated to promoting inclusion, health, and athletic opportunities for individuals with intellectual disabilities, we have seen firsthand the positive impact Reyes Coca-Cola has had across Southern California communities, including here in Rancho Cucamonga. Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling has been a valued supporter of SOSC for many years, contributing to our flagship events such as the Fall and Summer Games, and playing an important role in fostering community engagement through our annual Polar Plunge fundraiser in the Inland Empire. Their ongoing support has helped us raise critical funds, increase awareness, and empower athletes to reach their full potential while promoting inclusion throughout the region. As Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling looks to expand its local facility in Rancho Cucamonga, we recognize the potential for this growth to further strengthen their community engagement. An expanded presence could enhance their ability to provide even greater support to organizations like ours—through increased product donations, volunteer participation, and logistical support that directly benefits athletes and programs across the Inland Empire. We are deeply grateful for Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s continued commitment to community service, volunteerism, and partnership. Their dedication to making a positive difference in the lives of others reflects the very best of corporate citizenship. Sincerely, Kelly Pond President & CEO Special Olympics Southern California 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 2151 East Convention Center Way, Suite 210 Ontario, California, 91764 Phone: (909) 944 – 2201 www.ieep.com Executive Board Richard Egger, Chairman Best, Best, & Krieger John Chapman, First Vice-Chair San Antonio Regional Hospital Bansree Parikh, Second Vice-Chair JP Morgan Chase Lupe Valdez, Immediate Past-Chair Union Pacific Railroad Aaron Rios, Treasurer Walmart Ron Vera, Legal Counsel Vera & Barbosa Law Fran Inman, At-Large Member Majestic Realty Peter Villegas, At-Large Member Actum, LLC Paul Granillo, Secretary Inland Empire Economic Partnership Board of Directors Dr. Ron Carter Loma Linda University Health Patty Senecal, WSPA Carrie Schindler, SBCTA Derek Armstrong, County of San Bernardino EDA Dr. Kurt Wilson, WRCOG Dr. S. Jack Hu University of California, Riverside Jarrod McNaughton Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP) Sandra Cuellar, Charter Spectrum Manfred Keil, Ph.D. Chief Economist, IEEP Atif Elkadi, Ontario Airport Authority Mayor Acquanetta Warren City of Fontana Dr. Tomas Morales President, California State University, San Bernardino Lena Kent, BNSF Railway Trini Jimenez, Watson Land Company Col. Paul Cook (Ret.) Supervisor 1st District, County of San Bernardino Hon. Karen Spiegel Supervisor, 2nd District, County of Riverside Suzanne Holland, County of Riverside EDA Lisa Anderson LMA Consulting Group Kristine Scott, SoCalGas David Ambroz, Amazon Pat Morin, California Steel Industries Omar Cobian, SWRCC Frank Pine, Southern California News Group Michael Burrows, San Bernardino Airport Lowell King, Goodwill Southern California Mark Cloud, Southern California Edison Michael D’Elia, PNC Bank Alyson Piguee, Inland Empire Utilities Agency Kevin Haboian, HNTB Jessica Grimes, Kaiser Permanente November 5th, 2025 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Letter of Support for the Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling Project Dear Mayor Michael and City Councilmembers, On behalf of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP), I am writing to express our strong support for Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s Rancho Cucamonga Project. As the region’s largest economic development organization, our mission is to improve the quality of life and business climate in the Inland Empire by bringing together private- and public-sector leaders to advance responsible growth. Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s project represents exactly the type of investment our region needs. By creating new employment opportunities, generating economic activity, and fostering collaboration between business and community stakeholders, this development strengthens Rancho Cucamonga’s role as a hub of innovation and prosperity within the Inland Empire. Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling has been a longstanding and trusted partner in our region. Beyond being a major employer, they consistently demonstrate a commitment to the community through philanthropy, local partnerships, and civic engagement. Their leadership in the El Camino Project ensures that it will deliver benefits far beyond the economic, contributing to long-term community vitality. We respectfully urge your recommendation of approval for Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling’s Rancho Cucamonga project. IEEP looks forward to supporting its successful realization and to continuing our work to build a more prosperous and sustainable Inland Empire. Sincerely, Paul C. Granillo President and CEO Inland Empire Economic Partnership 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1 11-05-2025 - Regular City Council Meeting - Correspondence Received - Item G1