HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso PC25-036 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DESIGN
REVIEW, VARIANCE .AND MINOR EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 166 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN AN
APPROVED TRACT MAP ON APPROXIAMTELY 70-ACRES LOCATED
NEARTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDAAVENUE AND WILSON
AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS TRACTS 16072 AND 16072-2 WITHIN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL (L) ZONE.
A. Recitals.
1. The applicant, Lennar, filed an application requesting the approval of Design Review
(DRC2024-00395), Variance (DRC2025-00169), and Minor Exception (DRC2025-00168), as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements
request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 22"d of October, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said applications and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 22, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The project site consists of approximately 70 acres, generally located northeast
of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue in the northeastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga,
bounded by Etiwanda Avenue to the west and Wilson Avenue; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-036
DRC2024,-00395, DRC2025-00168, DRC2024-00169 — LENNAR VINOVA
October 22, 2025
Page 2
b. Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT16072) was approved by the City Council on June
16, 2004, the Final Map was approved and recorded in 2023, and associated grading permits
were issued in January 2024; and
C. The applicant proposes the construction of 166 single-family residences on the
aforementioned subdivided and graded lots; and
d. The existing land uses,. General Plan land use designations, and zoning
designations for the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcel)
are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential L
North Vacant General Open Space and Flood Control/Utility Corridor
Facilities FU/UC
South CVWD Facility/ General Open Space and Very Low (VL)/Parks (P)
Residential Facilities
East Vacant Traditional Neighborhood Neighborhood Estates 2
NE-2
West Single-Family Suburban Neighborhood Low Residential (L)
Residence
e. In addition to the Design Review application which permits the construction of
the proposed single-family residences,the Project also includes a request for a Variance to permit
deviations from the following requirements on specific lots within the proposed development:
permitted driveway frontage, deficient side yard setbacks, and front yard setbacks the
encroachment of structures into required setback areas, and the construction of walls which in
certain cases will exceed allowable height limitations. These deviations are necessary due to the
design of existing cul-de-sacs, topographical constraints caused by the configuration of the
proposed lots, steep terrain, and proximity to seismic fault zones. The specific lots to which the
requested Variance will apply are as follows: TR16072-2 Lots 3, 4, 19, 20, 21, 90 and 91, and
TR16072 Lots 18, 19, 20, 34, 35, 58, 59, and 60.
f. In addition to the Design Review and Variance, the application also proposes a
Minor Exception to permit deviations from permitted wall heights on certain lots within the
proposed development due to topography and proximity to seismic fault zones. The specific lots
to which the requested Minor Exception will apply are as follows: TR16072-2 Lots 1 and TR16072
Lots 2, 5, 6,12 and 50.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby makes the following findings for Design Review (DRC2024-
00395) pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.040:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan. The project site is designated as Traditional Neighborhood. The proposed project
aligns with the land use goals and policies identified in the general plan, including the construction
of traditional neighborhoods including single-family residences not to exceed 8 dwelling units to
the acre; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-036
DRC2024-00395, DRC2025-00168, DRC2024-00169 — LENNAR VINOVA
October 22, 2025
Page 3
b. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of this Development Code
and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is located within the
Low Residential (L) zone which is intended to accommodate the development of single-family
residential neighborhoods. The underlying subdivision map is consistent with subdivision
standards which were in place at the time that the subdivision was approved. The subject Low
Residential (L)zone anticipates the development of single-family neighborhoods as proposed by
the application; and
C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code. The ,project meets the required standards for site design, circulation,
landscaping and parking upon approval of the related request for a variance and minor exception;
and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health,, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.An Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the City
Council on June 16, 2004 relative to SUBTT16072 and related grading activities. The proposed
project proposing to construct residences on the previously subdivided and graded lots will not
result in any additional significant enviromnetal impacts which had not already been considered
by the previously approved EIR. Further, the proposed project to construct the residences will be
required to comply with all mitigation measures associated with previous approvals.
4. This Commission also hereby makes the following findings in support of Variance
(DRC2025-00169) pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.030:
a. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of
this code. The specific lots to which the requested Variance will apply are as follows: TR16072-2
Lots 3, 4, 19, 20, 21, 90'and 91 and TR16072 Lots 18, 19, 20, 34, 35, 58, 59, and 60.The Variance
is requested to accommodate a greater driveway frontage width on certain lots, and side yard and
front setback encroachments on other lots. These deviations are requested due to the existing lot
size of the previously approved lots, some of which are located on cul-de-sacs, and others which
are complicated by topography and proximity to seismic fault zones.A strict of literal interpretation
of the specified regulations would result in the developer not being able to construct housing
product of a compatible size when compared to other similarly situated properties throughout the
project area which would be inconsistent with the objectives of the code.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone. The subject project area comprises approximately 70 acres located
within the northeast portion of the City. This area is characterized by steep terrain and proximity
to seismic fault zones. Further, the underlying subdivision map upon which the project proposes
to construct 166 single-family residences was approved in 2004 at such a time that development
standards in place today did not exists.As such, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances exist
which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
C. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone.
The granting of the requested variance is necessary in order for the subject lots to accommodate
single-family residences of the size which are enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
same zone. Specifically, topographical constraints, including steep slopes and proximity to
seismic fault zones deprive the subject lots identified in (a) above the ability to develop to the size
of other similarly situated lots in the vicinity. Granting the variance permits these property owners
to enjoy,privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same zone.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-036
DRC2024-00395, DRC2025-00168, DRC2024-00169 — LENNAR VINOVA
October 22, 2025
Page 4
d. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Due to
topographical constraints, such as steep slope areas and proximity to seismic fault zones, require
that multiple properties within the project area will require variances to develop to a size consistent
and compatible with other properties in the same zone. Thus, the granting of the variance will not
constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties as other
properties within the zone which are similarly encumbered have also requested a variance.
e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the
variance is intended to allow for housing on the select lots identified in (a) above to enjoy the
same privileges as other properties in the zone. It is not anticipated that the granting of the
variance will be determinantal to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor is it anticipated that the
granting of the variance will be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as
all properties which obtain the granting of a variance are still required to comply with all necessary
building and safety codes and regulations.
5. The Planning Commission also hereby makes the following findings in support of Minor
Exception (DRC2025-00168) pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.16.110:
a. The minor exception is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific
plan or development agreement. The project site has a general plan land use designation of
Traditional Neighborhood, and the zoning is Low Residential (L). The request for a Minor
Exception is limited to specific lots and specifically related to wall height on said lots due to
topography and proximity of these lots to seismic fault zones. These specific lots include
TR16072-2 Lots 1 and 2, and TR16072 Lots 2, 5, 6,12 and 50. The Minor Exception on these
specific lots does,not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential
purpose of the project site; and
b. The proposed minor exception is compatible with existing and proposed land
uses in the surrounding area. The surrounding area to the project site includes areas which are
similarly steep in slope. Requests for such increases in wall height are not uncommon in steep
slope areas. The Minor Exception for increased wall height on the lots identified in (a) above is
consistent with other similar requests in similarly sloped areas. Thus, the proposed Minor
Exception is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area.
C. The proposed exception to the specific development standards is necessary to
allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate
unique site conditions. The increased wall height is necessary to accommodate steep slope
conditions and unique proximity to seismic faultzones. Permitting the increased wall height allows
the subject lots for which the Minor Exception is being requested to be developed similar to other
lots in the area which do not have these same unique constraints.
d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone, and will not be
detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct pads and building footprints
on the parcels identified in (a) above such that these lots and house sizes will be similar to other
lots in the area which do not face the same topographical,constraints. Thus, the height increase
is consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. Further, the increased wall height is
unlikely to impact public health, safety and/or welfare.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2025-036
DRC2024-00395, DRC2025-00168, DRC2024-00169— LENNAR VINOVA
October 22, 2025
Page 5
6. Planning Staff has determined that the project complies with the requirement of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. An Environmental
Impact Report was certified by the City Council on June 16, 2004 as part of the original approvals
of the underlying subdivision for the project site, SUBTT16072. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in
connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial
changes are proposed to the project that indicate ,new or more severe impacts on the
environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project
was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new
important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously
considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different
mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has reviewed the
project for compliance with CEQA.As the project only involves the construction of housing product
and associated features such as walls within the boundaries of a previously approved and
previously graded subdivision, staff has determined that: i) no substantial changes are proposed
that indicate new or more severe impacts, ii) no substantial changes have occurred in the
circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed, iii) no new important information
has been presented as part of this application which shows that project will have new or more
severe impacts than previously considered, and iv) there are no additional or different mitigation
measures which are now feasible or which could be imposed to substantially reduce impacts.
Accordingly, the project is exempt from further review under.
7. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and
6 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition
set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
T ny Morales, Chafrman
ATTEST
ftolution
amura, Secretary
I, JennifNacretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoin duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 22nd day of October 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MORALES, BOLING, DOPP, DANIELS, DIAZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Conditions of Approval
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA Community Development Department
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168, DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise plans to demonstrate compliance
with the Design Review Committee's direction to modify/add architectural treatments on the second
story of the following models/styles to the satisfaction of the Planning Director:
-Contemporary Prairie (Plan 10D)
-Contemporary Coastal (Plan 10B)
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall demonstrate compliance with all mitigation
measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report associated with SUBTT16072, approved by the
City Council on June 16, 2004,
Standard Conditions of Approval
3. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
4. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the
approved activity.
w .CityofRC.us
Printed:1 0/1 51202 5
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168, DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
5. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively "Indemnitees"), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures)
(collectively "Actions'), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map ,Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director's actions, the Planning Commission's actions, and/or the City Council's actions,
related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of .the approval, the City shall' estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all corresponding environmental mitigations from the previously certified Environmental
Impact Report shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all
parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by
a licensed Engineer/Architect.
7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
8. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and
occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted
by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:10/15/2025 Page 2 of 6
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168, DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
9. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown
on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations
regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
10. Front yard' and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development
Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting.
11. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
ease of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to building permit issuance of the houses. For development
occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape 'plans will also be reviewed by Fire
Construction Services.
12. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
13. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of
mailboxes.
14. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
15. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood
fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency.
16. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
17. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for
Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public
notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
18. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations,
and relevant provisions of the General Plan.
19. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:10/15/2025 Page 3 of 6
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168, DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
20. All above ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or
masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For
single-family residential developments, transformers shall also be above ground, pad mounted, meeting
current SCE design standards.
21. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot
wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street
trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and
approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs,
ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide
each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as
determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
22. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
23. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State
Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show
compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to
occupancy.
24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
25. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted
for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
26. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property
owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least
30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter.
27. For residential development,return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
28. Street names shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming
Policy, if not already approved under previously approved map SUBTT16072.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:10/15/2025 Page 4 of 6
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168', DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT,
Engineering Services Department
Please..be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance or Certificate of Occupancy
(Note: Development Impact Fees placed are subject to change annually)
Drainage Impact Fee
Transportation Impact Fee
Library Impact Fee
Animal Center Impact Fee
Police Impact Fee
Park Land Acquisition Fee
Park Improvement Impact Fee
Park Community& Recreation Center Impact Fee
2. Comply with all Conditions of Approval under case number'SUBTT16072.
Standard Conditions of Approval
3. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new
streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit
issuance if no map is involved.
4. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond
the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Combustible construction materials, including combustible roofing materials, are prohibited from being
onsite prior to a water supply system in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10 being provided in
accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the
Documents section of this project in the Online Permit Center.
2. Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3, Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
4. Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
5. Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be
in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:10/15/2025 Page 5 of 6
Project#: DRC2024-00395 DRC2025-00168, DRC2025-00169
Project Name: Vinova at Etiwanda
Location: 16072 16072-2 - 108749160-0000
Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Variance
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.•
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
6. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
7. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction materials
and methods are required to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section
R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. Please include this note on
the plans. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section of this case file in the
Online Permit Center.
8. Automatically operated garage doors and side-hinged exterior doors are required to have self-closing
features in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. Please note this on the plans and include the
specifications in the door schedule.
9. Fences and gates located within the 5-foot combustible exclusion zone are required to be entirely
constructed of non-combustible materials. Vinyl fencing and gates are considered to be combustible.
10. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. A site-specific or
project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be
in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section. The fire protection plan is required to be submitted and approved prior to the Fire District
approving the project as a whole.
www.CityafRC.us
Printed:10/15/2025 Page 6 of 6