HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/12/17 - Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 1
Mayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
December 17, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION
REGULAR MEETINGS
TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the
concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found
at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department
at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to
Resolution No. 2023-086.
Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the
agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on
the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.
TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 2
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, JULIE SOWLES, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, MIKE
MCCLIMAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN
RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BARGAINING GROUP, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION - IAFF LOCAL 2274, AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932.
(CITY/FIRE)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9: 1 CASE – SUPPORTERS ALLIANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY (“SAFER”)
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE SUIT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
REGARDING THE VINOVA COMMUNITY PROJECT (DRC2024-00395; DRC2025-00168; DRC2025-00169) .
THE RECORD OF THE THREAT OF LITIGATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
(CITY)
E. RECESS
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 3
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B.ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of the APWA Southern California Chapter BEST Award for the West Foothill Project.
B2. Recognition of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Being Awarded the IEEP Best Public Safety Initiative Award.
B3. Regional and Local Healthcare Update Presented by San Antonio Regional Hospital.
C.PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor
Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed
on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and
referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.
Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to
the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This
is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between
audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly
conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No.
2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business
portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business
portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of
public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of
the agenda has been completed.
---
---
---
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 4
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon
without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D.CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of December 3, 2025.
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,028,100.86 and City
and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in
the Total Amount of $3,923,164.86 Dated November 24, 2025, Through November 30, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $25,175.62 Dated November 24, 2025, Through November 30,
2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of October 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5. Consideration to Approve the Housing Successor Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Report. (HOUSING
SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
D6. Consideration to Accept and Adopt the Arts & Entertainment Programming Strategy Policy. (CITY)
D7. Consideration to Accept $1,000,000 of Community Project Funding from FY 2024 Congressional Directed
Funding Appropriation and Appropriate $1,000,000 in Grant Revenue and Expenditures to Pilot a Local
Circulator in Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY)
D8. Consideration to Accept $15,000 of Kaiser Permanente Grant Funds and Appropriate $15,000 in Revenue and
Expenditures to Expand Mental Health Resources at Day Creek Intermediate. (CITY)
D9. Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $120,000 from RC Fiber Fund for the Necessary Design,
Engineering, Permitting, Plan Review, and Project Management for the Distribution of the Fiber Optic Network
as Part of the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan. (CITY)
D10. Consideration of the Purchase of Radios from Motorola Solutions, Inc. as a Single Source Vendor in the
Amount of $28,390. (FIRE)
D11. Consideration to Approve the Use of National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) Value Point
Cooperative Agreement with CDWG, LLC in the Amount of $3,984,600 for the Procurement and Implementation
of Network Hardware, Software, and Services, with a Contingency of $80,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D12. Consideration of a Three-Year Professional Services Agreement with Empire Economics Inc., for Annual
Forecasting of Expected Economic and Housing Growth Conditions, and Supplemental Analysis as Requested,
in the Amount Not to Exceed $150,000. (CITY)
D13. Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Improvements
Related to Case No. DRC2017-01011, Located at 6140 Haven Avenue. (CITY)
7
13
26
28
108
115
120
122
124
170
172
234
257
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 5
D14. Consideration of an Award of a Professional Services Agreement for Five-Year On-Call Contract for Acting City
Surveyor Services for Fiscal Years 2025/26 through 2029/30. (CITY)
D15. Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for
Conceptual Design Services in the Amount of $1,396,774. (FIRE)
D16. Consideration to Accept the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178 Facility as Complete, File a
Notice of Completion, and Release of Retention. (FIRE)
D17. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and
Bonds for the Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project (Project). This Project is Exempt from the
Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 –
Existing Facilities. (CITY)
D18. Consideration to Adopt Resolutions Updating the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District Salary Schedules. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-100 AND RESOLUTION FD 2025-029)
(CITY/FIRE)
E.CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F.ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1. Review of Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 – Hamilton Family Brewery. This Review Does Not Constitute a
Revocation Hearing under Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.14.110. (CITY)
G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a General Plan Amendment to Amend the General
Plan Land Use and Community Character Chapter related to Floor Area Ratio on Table LC-1 and Policies
Relating to Block Lengths; Amend the General Plan Mobility and Access Chapter to add Dimension Standards
for Street Typologies, Remove the Proposed 8th Street Trail and Amend the Truck Routes Map Pursuant to
AB98; and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinances 1053 and 1054 to be Read by Title Only to Amend
Municipal Code Table 17.130.050-1 to Update Floor Area Ratio and Ground Floor Use Regulations for Form
Based Zones and Amend Municipal Code Section 17.138.030 Regarding Block Length for Form Based Zones
and Amend Municipal Code Section 10.56.020 to Alter Truck Routes. An Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Has Been Prepared for this Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-102 AND ORDINANCE NOS. 1053 AND 1054)
(CITY)
G2. Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of City Council Ordinance No. 1052 to Approve Development
Agreement DRC2022-00266 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading: to Consider a City Council
Resolution to Adopt Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173), Conditional
Use Permit (DRC2022-00009), and Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) for the Development of
Three (3) Concrete Tilt-up Industrial Buildings Totaling Approximately 982,096 Square Feet on Approximately
45.96 Net Acres Bound by Vineyard Avenue to the East, 9th Street to the North, Baker Avenue to the West, and
the BNSF/Metrolink Railroad Line to the South; APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, -97. An
Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was Prepared for the Project. (Primary Case File No:
Design Review (DRC2019-00742). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-101 AND ORDINANCE NO. 1052) (CITY)
H.CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Receive and File an Oral Presentation by the Etiwanda Historical Society of Its Annual Report of Events,
Fundraising, Membership, and Outreach Activities. (CITY)
260
262
278
282
285
305
345
397
563
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for
all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”
Page 6
I.COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J.CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K.IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L.ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Ashton R. Arocho, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty
of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.
ASHTON AROCHO, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk
Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
---
---
Regional Healthcare
Update
Heather Gray, Chief Marketing & Communications Officer
Brenda N. Rangel, Government Affairs Coordinator
At least 56 maternity wards
have closed in California
since 2012.
•In 2024, seven hospitals shut
down maternity wards and
others announced plans to
close theirs.
3 Hospitals in the region
have closed their Maternity
Unit.
•San Dimas Community
Hospital- Closure 2023
•Montclair Hospital Medical
Center- Closure 2024
•Corona Regional Medical
Center- Closure 2025 X- Maternity Closures - Open Maternity Units
Maternity Crisis
New Maternity Unit
Center of Aging- Continued
Center of Aging
Behavior Health Urgent Care
Community Benefit Report Highlights
•Healthy Beginnings
•NICU Follow Up Clinic
•Educational Classes
•Mental Health Fairs
•Narcan Distribution
•Wellness Starts With You
•OMSD Parent Leadership Conference
•Generations Ahead
•Community Health Improvement
Program/ Enhanced Care Management
(2025)
•Community Health Screenings
•Community Outreach
•Cardiac Lectures at SARH
•Super Science Days
•Young Healthcare Professionals
•Clinical Shadowing Program
•Non-Clinical Internship
•Nursing Scholarships
Super Science Days
Inspires elementary students
to explore STEM and
healthcare careers through
hands-on experiments.
Learn about our youth programs
Clinical Shadowing
Program
Offers high school students
early exposure to healthcare
careers through hospital
department rotations and
professional development.
Young Healthcare
Professionals
Engages high school students
in exploring clinical and non-
clinical healthcare careers
while building life-saving
skills and college and career
readiness.
High School Wellness
Program
Provides college interns with
hands-on health education
experience as they teach high
school students practical skills to
support their overall well-being.
Clinical Shadowing Program
The Clinical Shadowing Program (CSP) provides juniors in high school with an immersive experience
in a hospital setting. Students will have the opportunity to shadow providers in different
departments, develop professional skills to prepare them for the future of work, and connect with
professionals in healthcare.
From receiving mentorship to observing procedures, participants gain a firsthand understanding of
the challenges and rewards of a medical career.
2023-2025 Lewis-HCI Programming
Schools
Lehigh Elementary
Upland
Colony
Etiwanda
Los Osos High
Ontario
Rancho Cucamonga
Colton
Summit
Alta Loma
Kaiser
Montclair
Silverado
Pacific
Cajon
San Gorgino
Baldy View ROP
*2024- San Bernardino County
Superintendent of Schools Funding -
Expanding into the High Desert and
Beyond*
Community Health Screenings
•Community health screenings
conducted in Ontario, Rancho
Cucamonga, Upland, Fontana,
Montclair, and Chino.
•Screenings included A1C checks,
blood pressure monitoring,
cardiovascular assessments, and
prostate cancer screenings
through blood samples.
•Participants received their results
on-site, and any abnormalities
were referred to our Care 4 You
clinic locations for follow-up
care.
Total Screened: 305
Ontario | Total Participants: 86
St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Catholic Community Church, March 16 & 23
Screenings Conducted
Fontana | Total Participants: 53
Loveland Church, June 25 & July 12
Rancho Cucamonga | Total Participants: 80
National Night Out, August 5 (24)
Lifeway Church, September 13 (56)
Montclair | Total Participants: 16
Montclair Community Center, October 2
Chino | Total Participants: 7
Chaffey College, Chino Campus, October 1
Upland | Total Participants: 63
SARH Cardiac Lecture, February 26 (24)
Gibson Senior Center, October 3 (39)
3 Workshops Focused On:
Nutrient-Dense Meals
Supplements, Smoothies, and Glycemic Index
Heart Healthy and Anti-Inflammatory Meals
Nutrition Education
A nutrition educator provided evidence-
based information in a non-judgmental,
concise lecture.
Participants were very engaged and asked
questions throughout the presentation.
Simple, effective ways to increase nutrients
regardless of lifestyle was shared.
Free Groceries & Cooking
Supplies
All attendees took home grocery kits with
ingredients needed to make the meal at
home along with cooking supplies needed
for the recipe.
Automatic can openers, smoothie blenders
and vegetable choppers were given to
select participants.
Interactive
Cooking Demos
Attendees participated in hands-on cooking
demonstrations, learning how to prepare
hummus and veggie wraps, chickpea salads,
yogurt parfaits and protein drinks.
These sessions helped participants practice
simple, affordable recipes.
DESTIGMATIZING &
DISTRIBUTING NARCAN
This includes:
•explaining why narcan is important
•training them on how to use it
•the warning signs of an opiod overdose
•where to get more Narcan for free!
“Los Angeles County experienced a 22% decline in drug-
related overdose deaths and poisonings in 2024, the most
significant drop in LA County history.”
“A spectrum of community-based overdose prevention efforts
to increase those across the County that carry naloxone, is
essential to save lives and protect public health and safety.”
(LACDPH)
Our team has distributed over 713 boxes of Naloxone over
the past year.
Why Is This Important?
•Ontario: 758
•Chino: 699
•Rancho Cucamonga: 685
•Upland: 663
•Fontana: 224
•Pomona: 130
•Rialto: 110
•La Verne: 19
•San Bernardino: 12
WHERE WE’VE BEEN
(SEPT 2024 - SEPT 2025)
Outreach MAP
KEY COMMUNITY PARTNERS
Questions?
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 6
December 3, 2025
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, December
3, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler and Mayor L. Dennis
Michael. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy.
Also present were: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager; Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas
Ghirelli, City Attorney; Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Community Development, Jennifer
Gracia, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of
Administrative Services.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN
RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, JULIE
SOWLES, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, MIKE MCCLIMAN, ASSISTANT CITY
MANAGER/FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES
BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BARGAINING
GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION - IAFF LOCAL 2274,
AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. (CITY/FIRE)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - SIGNIFICANT
EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF
SECTION 54956.9: (3 CASES). THE CITY HAS RECEIVED THREE GOVERNMENT
CLAIMS REGARDING DAMAGE TO THREE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ALONG
BELLA VISTA DRIVE AND CARNELIAN STREET. COPIES OF THE CLAIMS ARE
AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. (CITY)
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 5:51 p.m.
Page 7
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 6
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency,
Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were
held on Wednesday, December 3, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler and Mayor L. Dennis
Michael. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy.
Also present were: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Patricia Bravo-
Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.
Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
None.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
B1. Oath of Office Ceremony for Rancho Cucamonga City Manager Elisa C. Cox.
Mayor Michael administered the Oath of Office for Rancho Cucamonga City Manager Elisa C.
Cox. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council congratulated City Manager Cox on being
named the City’s fourth City Manager since incorporation and presented City Manager Cox with
a Certificate of Appointment.
B2. Administration of Oath of Office to Reappointed Planning/Historical Preservation
Commissioners Al Boling, James Daniels and Tony Morales.
Mayor Michael administered the Oath of Office to reappointed Planning/Historical Preservation
Commissioners Al Boling, James Daniels and Tony Morales. Mayor Michael and Members of the
City Council presented Commissioners with Certificates of Appointments.
B3. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Youth Volunteers of the Church of Jesus
Christ Latter Day Saints.
Leslie Jenson, Communications Director for the Church of Latter Day Saints in Rancho Cucamonga
formally acknowledged and commended the youth volunteers for their dedicated service and meaningful
contributions to a recent community project. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a
Certificate of Recognition to Youth Volunteers of the Church of Latter Day Saints and thanked them for
their compassion and service.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Two (2) speakers: J.A. Anton and Jess addressed the Council regarding immigration enforcement
activities reportedly conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at the Rancho
Cucamonga Courthouse and a Home Depot location. Ms. Anton urged the Council to affirm the City's
commitment to community values by considering the adoption of resolutions or policies aimed at
supporting and protecting immigrant residents.
Page 8
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 6
Four (4) speakers: Justin Nottingham, Chris Little, Edward Aldaz and Christine Sabala spoke in
opposition of a proposed zoning amendment to the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation
Plan. Speakers shared concerns about high-density housing, insufficient public notification, ambiguity in
the definition of 'single-family home’, traffic congestion and noted the project location is misaligned with
the Etiwanda neighborhood and would be better suited near a transportation corridor.
City Attorney Ghirelli provided clarification on the City Council’s decision -making process and informed
the community that the proposed zoning amendment to the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and
Conservation Plan is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission at its meeting on December 10,
2025, in Council Chambers. The item will be publicly noticed as a hearing and will subsequently be
presented to the City Council for discussion and consideration in early 2026.
Two (2) speakers: La Vay Bland and Liz Acuna spoke in opposition of the Hamilton Family Brewery
location at 8889 Archibald Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Speakers shared concerns about the
brewery’s location near a residential area, noise, parking overflow impacting the adjacent neighborhood,
disruptive patron behavior, public intoxication, traffic and public safety.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Scott abstained on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is
Southern California Gas Company.
D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of November 19, 2025.
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$1,155,944.03 for City and the Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks
Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,420,209.24 Dated
November 12, 2025, Through November 23, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued
to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,004.07, Dated November
12, 2025, Through November 23, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration of an Agreement with Z&K Consultants for Construction Management and
Inspection Services and an Appropriation in the Amount of $227,568 for the Civic Center
Waterproofing and Roof Repairs Project. (CITY)
D5. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Group for Contract Code
Enforcement Services for a 1 Year Term, with the Option of Two 1 Year Renewals in the
Amount Not to Exceed of $525,000. (CITY)
D6. Consideration of a Request to Summarily Vacate a Portion of Right -of-Way Along East
Avenue Related to Project Case No. DRC2020-00438, Located at the Southeast Corner of
Banyan Street and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-095) (CITY)
D7. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2025-099) (CITY)
D8. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Executive Management Employee Group.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2025-098) (CITY)
Page 9
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 6
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve
Consent Calendar items D1 through D8, with Council Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried
4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.
Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
ORDINANCE NO. 1049
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 17.100 OF ARTICLE V OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO
UPDATE THE REGULATIONS REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUS)
AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (JADUS) IN COMPLIANCE WITH
STATE LAW AND TO ESTABLISH A BONUS ADU PROGRAM, AND FINDING THE
ITEM TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA), PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(H) AND 15061(B)(3)
E2. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
ORDINANCE NO. 1050
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DISSOLVING THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, APPROVING A MUNICIPAL
CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND SECTION 12.20.080 OF CHAPTER 12.20 OF TITLE 12
AND SECTIONS 17.20.020 AND 17.20.040 OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ELIMINATE REFERENCES TO THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND 15378(B)(5)
E3. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:
ORDINANCE NO. 1051
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 89 ADOPTING A DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE
WHICH ESTABLISHES A DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AND DESIGN REVIEW
CRITERIA
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to waive full reading
and adopt Ordinance Nos. 1049, 1050 and 1051 by title only.
Patricia Bravo-Valez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services, read the titles of Ordinance Nos.
1049, 1050 and 1051.
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member
Stickler, to waive full readings and adopt Ordinance Nos. 1049, 1050 and 1051 by title only. Motion
carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
None.
Page 10
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 6
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1. Public Hearing to Consider Establishing, Repealing, and Amending Certain Service and
User Fee Adjustments for Various Departments (Building & Safety, Community Services,
Engagement and Special Programs, Engineering Services, Library Services, and Public
Works), and Consider a Resolution Approving Such New, Amended, and Repealed Service
and User Fees. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-097) (CITY)
City Manager Cox introduced Darrell Richardson, Management Analyst II, who provided a staff report
along with a PowerPoint presentation about establishing, repealing, and amending certain service and
user fee adjustments for various departments.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
There were no public communications.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to adopt
Resolution No. 2025-097, establishing, repealing, and amending certain service and user fee adjustments
for various departments (Building & Safety, Community Services, Engagement and Special Programs,
Engineering Services, Library Services, and Public Works). Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem
Kennedy.
G2. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision to Approve a
Request for Design Review, Minor Exception, and Variance for the Construction of 166
Single-Family Residences Proposed Within an Approved Tract Map on Approximately 70 -
acres Located Near the Northeast Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue in the
Low Residential (L) Zone; (Tracts 16072 and 16072-2) This item is Exempt from the
Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section
15162. Case File Number: Design Review DRC2024 -00395, Minor Exception DRC2025-
00168, Variance DRC2025-00169. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-096) (CITY)
City Manager Cox introduced Sean McPherson, Principal Planner, who provided a staff report along with
a PowerPoint for an Appeal of a Planning Commission Decision for the construction of 166 single -family
residences within a previously approved tract. Two (2) letters were received in opposition by Lozeau
Drury, LLP and Alicia Mosley, copies of the correspondence received were provided to the City Council
and were available for the public to review on the City’s website.
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
Appellant, Hayley Uno, Lozeau Drury LLP, addressed the City Council on the appeal submitted.
Applicant, Matthew Gevergiz, Project Manager at Lennar Homes, spoke in favor of the project.
Two (2) speakers: Alicia Mosley and Michelle Lauron, spoke in opposition of item G2 and the Etiwanda
Heights Plan. Their comments included concerns regarding insufficient public notification, increased
traffic congestion, potential environmental impacts, and the incompatibility of compact -style housing with
the existing neighborhood aesthetic.
City Attorney Ghirelli clarified that Item G2 is unrelated to the proposed zoning amendment to the
Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan. He reminded the public that the zoning
amendment will be presented to the Planning Commission on December 10, 2025, with the item publicly
noticed as a hearing, and subsequently presented to the City Council for discussion and consideration in
January or February 2026. He further noted that Item G2 pertains to a single-family residential project
originally approved approximately 20 years ago, for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
previously prepared.
Page 11
*DRAFT*
December 3, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 6
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Resolution
No. 2025-096, denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to approve a
request for Design Review, Minor Exception, and Variance for the construction of 166 single -family
residences proposed within an approved Tract Map on approximately 70-acres located near the northeast
corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue in the Low Residential (L) Zone; (Tracts 16072 and
16072-2). Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
None.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. Consideration to Approve the Appointment of One Member and Re-appointments of Two
Members to the Public Art Committee. (CITY)
Mayor Michael introduced Community Services Subcommittee Council Member Scott and Council
Member Stickler, who provided a verbal report for item I1.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve the
appointment of Tara Bryan and re-appointments of Ebony McGee and Ilianna Salas to the Public Art
Committee. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy.
I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
I3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
None.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier
that evening.
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
None.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:12 p.m.
Approved:
Ashton R. Arocho, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
Page 12
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the
Total Amount of $1,028,100.86 and City and Fire District Weekly Check
Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas
Company) in the Total Amount of $3,923,164.86 Dated November 24,
2025, Through November 30, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $12,614.93 and $1,015,485.93 for the City and
the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $3,553,238.51 and
$369,926.35 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 13
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 1 of 12
Company: City & Fire
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Payment Date On or After: 11/24/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 11/30/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Onyx Paving
Company Inc: 11/24/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/24/2025 Onyx Paving Company Inc 1,285,249.00 0 1,285,249.00
Supplier Payment: Donald Heyde:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Donald Heyde 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Danny G Holt:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Danny G Holt 0 1,730.68 1,730.68
Supplier Payment: Patrick Jerkins:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Patrick Jerkins 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Jackie Deans:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Jackie Deans 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Robert Eggers:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Robert Eggers 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Rosalyn
Interlicchia: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Rosalyn Interlicchia 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: William M
Kirkpatrick: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 William M Kirkpatrick 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: William Lane:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 William Lane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: David W Larkin:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 David W Larkin 0 768.52 768.52
Supplier Payment: Allan J Lee:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Allan J Lee 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Peter
Magnuson: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Peter Magnuson 0 1,685.46 1,685.46
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 14
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 2 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Ron Mayfield:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Ron Mayfield 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: John Mckee:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 John Mckee 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Stephen Kilmer:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Stephen Kilmer 0 768.52 768.52
Supplier Payment: Paul E Lenze:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Paul E Lenze 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Philip Loncar:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Philip Loncar 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Joe Longo:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Joe Longo 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Darrell Luttrull:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Darrell Luttrull 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Beverly Mackall:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Beverly Mackall 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Mcneil:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Kenneth Mcneil 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Dennis Myskow:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Dennis Myskow 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Michael
Nauman: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael Nauman 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Patrick Proulx:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Patrick Proulx 0 1,690.43 1,690.43
Supplier Payment: L. Dennis
Michael: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 L. Dennis Michael 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Byron Morgan:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Byron Morgan 0 515.44 515.44
Page 15
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 3 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Mary Jane
Nelson: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Mary Jane Nelson 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Eric Noreen:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Eric Noreen 0 3,127.70 3,127.70
Supplier Payment: Tom O'Brien:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Tom O'Brien 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Michael J
Ploung: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael J Ploung 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Michael R Post:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael R Post 0 2,331.10 2,331.10
Supplier Payment: Michael
Redmond: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael Redmond 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Brent Roberts:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Brent Roberts 0 1,086.55 1,086.55
Supplier Payment: Cheryl L
Roberts: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Cheryl L Roberts 0 3,077.83 3,077.83
Supplier Payment: Victor
Rodriguez: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455414 11/26/2025 Victor Rodriguez 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Ronald Smith:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Ronald Smith 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Social
Vocational Services: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Social Vocational Services 5,123.25 0 5,123.25
Supplier Payment: United Site
Services: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455409 11/26/2025 United Site Services 305.29 0 305.29
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455361 11/26/2025 C V W D 33,146.72 0 33,146.72
Supplier Payment: Amg &
Associates Inc: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Amg & Associates Inc 0 243,650.05 243,650.05
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455401 11/26/2025 Southern California Edison 11,222.85 0 11,222.85
Supplier Payment: 11 11 Systems,
Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 11 11 Systems, Inc 9,695.65 0 9,695.65
Page 16
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 4 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Sam'S Club /
Synchrony Bank: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455396 11/26/2025 Sam'S Club / Synchrony
Bank
76.00 0 76.00
Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455359 11/26/2025 Covetrus North America 272.78 0 272.78
Supplier Payment: Midwest
Veterinary Supply Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455386 11/26/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply
Inc
420.07 0 420.07
Supplier Payment: Idexx
Distribution Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455378 11/26/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 3,576.40 0 3,576.40
Supplier Payment: Chaffey Joint
Union High School District:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Chaffey Joint Union High
School District
1,527.96 0 1,527.96
Supplier Payment: Us Department
Of Energy: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Us Department Of Energy 7,986.16 0 7,986.16
Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange
County Janitorial Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455352 11/26/2025 Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc
1,760.00 0 1,760.00
Supplier Payment: Young
Rembrandts: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455419 11/26/2025 Young Rembrandts 324.00 0 324.00
Supplier Payment: Alliant Insurance
Services Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Alliant Insurance Services
Inc
15,455.00 0 15,455.00
Supplier Payment: Edgar P
Pazmino: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455367 11/26/2025 Edgar P Pazmino 500.00 0 500.00
Supplier Payment: El Tio Alex
Mexican Restaurant: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455369 11/26/2025 El Tio Alex Mexican
Restaurant
2,155.00 0 2,155.00
Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness
Repair Shop: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455355 11/26/2025 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 750.00 0 750.00
Supplier Payment: The Remy
Corporation: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455406 11/26/2025 The Remy Corporation 15,427.50 0 15,427.50
Supplier Payment: Sidepath Inc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455397 11/26/2025 Sidepath Inc 39,931.50 0 39,931.50
Supplier Payment: Babcock
Laboratories Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455346 11/26/2025 Babcock Laboratories Inc 476.80 0 476.80
Supplier Payment: William Vasta
Photography: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 William Vasta Photography 2,000.00 0 2,000.00
Supplier Payment: Brendon Fung:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Brendon Fung 5,525.00 0 5,525.00
Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr
Supply Company: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455385 11/26/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply
Company
0 66.89 66.89
Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Sovic Creative 1,500.00 0 1,500.00
Supplier Payment: Dependable
Break Room Solutions Inc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455365 11/26/2025 Dependable Break Room
Solutions Inc
89.70 0 89.70
Page 17
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 5 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor
Power Inland Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland
Llc
811.48 0 811.48
Supplier Payment: Via Actuarial
Solutions: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455413 11/26/2025 Via Actuarial Solutions 2,300.00 0 2,300.00
Supplier Payment: Stotz
Equipment: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455404 11/26/2025 Stotz Equipment 163.80 0 163.80
Supplier Payment: Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber Of
Commerce: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455395 11/26/2025 Rancho Cucamonga
Chamber Of Commerce
5,350.00 0 5,350.00
Supplier Payment: Pfm Asset
Management Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Pfm Asset Management Llc 18,552.33 0 18,552.33
Supplier Payment: Hdl Coren &
Cone: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455376 11/26/2025 Hdl Coren & Cone 5,431.25 0 5,431.25
Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn &
Associates Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455381 11/26/2025 Kimley-Horn & Associates
Inc
5,980.20 0 5,980.20
Supplier Payment: Absolute
Security International Inc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Absolute Security
International Inc
8,605.08 0 8,605.08
Supplier Payment: Bpr Consulting
Group Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Bpr Consulting Group Llc 145.00 0 145.00
Supplier Payment: Progress Equals
Perfection LLC: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455394 11/26/2025 Progress Equals Perfection
LLC
1,034.99 0 1,034.99
Supplier Payment: University
Enterprises Corporation:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455410 11/26/2025 University Enterprises
Corporation
6,250.00 0 6,250.00
Supplier Payment: Amazon Web
Services Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Amazon Web Services Inc 3,200.04 0 3,200.04
Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing
Lp: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Dell Marketing Lp 1,820.20 0 1,820.20
Supplier Payment: Polaris
Education Foundation: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Polaris Education
Foundation
1,694.40 0 1,694.40
Supplier Payment: Convergint
Technologies Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455358 11/26/2025 Convergint Technologies
Llc
109,260.00 0 109,260.00
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455391 11/26/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,060.49 0 1,060.49
Supplier Payment: Mr. Appliance of
Rancho Cucamonga: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455388 11/26/2025 Mr. Appliance of Rancho
Cucamonga
1,066.32 0 1,066.32
Supplier Payment: Christopher
Pellitteri: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Christopher Pellitteri 268.80 0 268.80
Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 G/M Business Interiors 0 21,680.49 21,680.49
Page 18
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 6 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Ascent
Environmental Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455345 11/26/2025 Ascent Environmental Inc 2,980.70 0 2,980.70
Supplier Payment: Mr. Rock N' Roll,
Inc.: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455389 11/26/2025 Mr. Rock N' Roll, Inc.7,000.00 0 7,000.00
Supplier Payment: Valverde Stage
Productions Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Valverde Stage
Productions Inc
12,000.00 0 12,000.00
Supplier Payment: Scott D
Sorensen: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Scott D Sorensen 0 1,671.25 1,671.25
Supplier Payment: James Sullivan:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 James Sullivan 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Steven Taylor:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Steven Taylor 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Terry Tuley:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Terry Tuley 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Francis
Vanderkallen: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Francis Vanderkallen 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Anthony Varney:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Anthony Varney 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Kevin Walton:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Kevin Walton 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Timothy A
Yowell: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Timothy A Yowell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Jeffrey Roeder:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Jeffrey Roeder 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Ivan M Rojer:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Ivan M Rojer 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Thomas
Salisbury: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Thomas Salisbury 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Viola Spagnolo:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455415 11/26/2025 Viola Spagnolo 0 329.56 329.56
Page 19
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 7 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: William Spain:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 William Spain 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Richard Toll:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Richard Toll 0 3,127.70 3,127.70
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Walker:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455380 11/26/2025 Kenneth Walker 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455373 11/26/2025 Frontier Comm 911.96 0 911.96
Supplier Payment: Victoria Bantau:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Victoria Bantau 0 690.62 690.62
Supplier Payment: South Coast
Aqmd: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455400 11/26/2025 South Coast Aqmd 839.70 0 839.70
Supplier Payment: Assi Security:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Assi Security 3,970.00 0 3,970.00
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 2,976.65 2,976.65
Supplier Payment: Richards
Watson & Gershon: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
0 96.00 96.00
Supplier Payment: West End
Material Supply: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455418 11/26/2025 West End Material Supply 24.67 0 24.67
Supplier Payment: West Coast
Sand & Gravel Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455417 11/26/2025 West Coast Sand & Gravel
Inc
1,677.67 0 1,677.67
Supplier Payment: Standard
Insurance Company: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455403 11/26/2025 Standard Insurance
Company
5,906.09 0 5,906.09
Supplier Payment: Pre-Paid Legal
Services Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455393 11/26/2025 Pre-Paid Legal Services
Inc
287.29 0 287.29
Supplier Payment: Inyo Networks
Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455379 11/26/2025 Inyo Networks Inc 11,119.50 0 11,119.50
Supplier Payment: Eide Bailly, LLP:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455368 11/26/2025 Eide Bailly, LLP 40,219.97 0 40,219.97
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455392 11/26/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
0 304.00 304.00
Supplier Payment: Danken
Construction Engineering Group:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455363 11/26/2025 Danken Construction
Engineering Group
4,355.00 0 4,355.00
Page 20
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 8 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Qless Inc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Qless Inc 21,196.38 0 21,196.38
Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455343 11/26/2025 Alma Arocho 588.00 0 588.00
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455402 11/26/2025 Southern California Edison 0 1,119.22 1,119.22
Supplier Payment: Felicity USA
Management Services LLC:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Felicity USA Management
Services LLC
27.00 0 27.00
Supplier Payment: Brightview
Landscape Services Inc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Brightview Landscape
Services Inc
29,198.01 0 29,198.01
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455374 11/26/2025 Frontier Comm 0 566.68 566.68
Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale
Hardware: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455384 11/26/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 153.23 0 153.23
Supplier Payment: Verizon
Business: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455411 11/26/2025 Verizon Business 0 3,691.88 3,691.88
Supplier Payment: Daniels Tire
Service: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455362 11/26/2025 Daniels Tire Service 0 193.20 193.20
Supplier Payment: Hometown
America - Ramona Villa Mhp:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455377 11/26/2025 Hometown America -
Ramona Villa Mhp
300.00 0 300.00
Supplier Payment: Kingdom
Calibrations Inc: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455382 11/26/2025 Kingdom Calibrations Inc 0 285.00 285.00
Supplier Payment: The Groves On
Foothill: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455405 11/26/2025 The Groves On Foothill 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Chaparral
Heights Mobile Home Park:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455353 11/26/2025 Chaparral Heights Mobile
Home Park
100.00 0 100.00
Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus
Solutions: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455371 11/26/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 462.56 462.56
Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape
Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455357 11/26/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 52,993.02 0 52,993.02
Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins
Llp: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455356 11/26/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 10,089.67 0 10,089.67
Supplier Payment: ACC
Contractors, Inc.: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455341 11/26/2025 ACC Contractors, Inc.439,138.57 0 439,138.57
Page 21
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 9 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Verizon
Wireless - La: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455412 11/26/2025 Verizon Wireless - La 254.62 0 254.62
Supplier Payment: Bordin Semmer
Llp: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455348 11/26/2025 Bordin Semmer Llp 539.50 0 539.50
Supplier Payment: Lenovo (United
States) Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Lenovo (United States) Inc 166,593.35 0 166,593.35
Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455416 11/26/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 464.59 0 464.59
Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape
Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Midwest Tape Llc 106.80 0 106.80
Supplier Payment: Alexander R
Ahumada: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Alexander R Ahumada 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Susan Bazal:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Susan Bazal 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Michael L Bell:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael L Bell 0 1,690.43 1,690.43
Supplier Payment: David Berry:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 David Berry 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Richard Clabby:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Richard Clabby 0 817.12 817.12
Supplier Payment: Robert Anthony
Corcoran: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Robert Anthony Corcoran 0 348.74 348.74
Supplier Payment: Dennis M
Costello: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Dennis M Costello 0 2,331.10 2,331.10
Supplier Payment: Musicland:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Musicland 1,011.50 0 1,011.50
Supplier Payment: Diane Carty:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455366 11/26/2025 Diane Carty 150.00 0 150.00
Supplier Payment: Air Exchange
Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Air Exchange Inc 12,580.41 0 12,580.41
Supplier Payment: David Freeman:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455364 11/26/2025 David Freeman 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Animal
Emergency Clinic: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455344 11/26/2025 Animal Emergency Clinic 350.00 0 350.00
Supplier Payment: Jordan Beck:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Jordan Beck 13,000.00 0 13,000.00
Page 22
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 10 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Thomas A
Flamino: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455407 11/26/2025 Thomas A Flamino 700.00 0 700.00
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks
Vet Hospital: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455375 11/26/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 700.00 0 700.00
Supplier Payment: Environment
Planning Dvmt Solutions:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455370 11/26/2025 Environment Planning
Dvmt Solutions
10,000.00 0 10,000.00
Supplier Payment: Ups: 11/26/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Ups 350.31 0 350.31
Supplier Payment: Cameron-Daniel
Pc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455351 11/26/2025 Cameron-Daniel Pc 4,245.30 0 4,245.30
Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart
Technology Solutions: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455390 11/26/2025 Mrc Smart Technology
Solutions
1,233.74 0 1,233.74
Supplier Payment: Hci
Environmental & Engineering Svc:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Hci Environmental &
Engineering Svc
4,469.31 0 4,469.31
Supplier Payment: Advanced
Chemical Transport Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455342 11/26/2025 Advanced Chemical
Transport Inc
965.00 0 965.00
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Grainger 10,596.97 0 10,596.97
Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Jorry Keith 204.00 0 204.00
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
11/26/2025 Sharon Ott 1,912.20 0 1,912.20
Supplier Payment: California Public
Policy Group, Inc.: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455350 11/26/2025 California Public Policy
Group, Inc.
19,000.00 0 19,000.00
Supplier Payment: C T & T
Concrete Paving Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455360 11/26/2025 C T & T Concrete Paving
Inc
413,896.09 0 413,896.09
Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455408 11/26/2025 Tirehub Llc 0 1,288.83 1,288.83
Supplier Payment: Monet
Construction, Inc.: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455387 11/26/2025 Monet Construction, Inc.586,864.69 0 586,864.69
Supplier Payment: California
Municipal Statistics Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455349 11/26/2025 California Municipal
Statistics Inc
600.00 0 600.00
Supplier Payment: Franklin Truck
Parts Inc: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455372 11/26/2025 Franklin Truck Parts Inc 0 544.29 544.29
Supplier Payment: Lawrence W.
Rosine Co.: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455383 11/26/2025 Lawrence W. Rosine Co.7,015.85 0 7,015.85
Supplier Payment: Bab Steering
Hydraulics Inc: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455347 11/26/2025 Bab Steering Hydraulics
Inc
0 6,804.60 6,804.60
Page 23
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 11 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Lloyd Almand:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Lloyd Almand 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Robin Brock:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Robin Brock 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Gerald
Campbell: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Gerald Campbell 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Steven
Campbell: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Steven Campbell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Kenneth
Carnes: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Kenneth Carnes 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Donald R
Cloughesy: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Donald R Cloughesy 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Ralph Crane:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Ralph Crane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: James Curatalo:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 James Curatalo 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Jay Davenport:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Jay Davenport 0 3,077.83 3,077.83
Supplier Payment: Susan De
Antonio: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Susan De Antonio 0 1,105.73 1,105.73
Supplier Payment: Karl Cox:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Karl Cox 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Wilbur
Crossland: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Wilbur Crossland 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: James Dague:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 James Dague 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Charlene
Dominick: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455354 11/26/2025 Charlene Dominick 0 426.70 426.70
Page 24
Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
05:45 PM
12/01/2025
Page 12 of 12
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Michael
Eagleson: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Michael Eagleson 0 1,671.25 1,671.25
Supplier Payment: Tim Fejeran:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 Tim Fejeran 0 2,250.95 2,250.95
Supplier Payment: John D Fritchey:
11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
11/26/2025 John D Fritchey 0 658.62 658.62
Supplier Payment: Aj'S
Entertainment: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455420 11/26/2025 Aj'S Entertainment 17,050.00 0 17,050.00
Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest
Control: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455424 11/26/2025 Stanley Pest Control 3,110.00 0 3,110.00
Supplier Payment: Lowes
Companies Inc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455422 11/26/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 10,468.02 0 10,468.02
Supplier Payment: Lowes
Companies Inc: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
455421 11/26/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 0 1,174.10 1,174.10
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455423 11/26/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 1,838.82 0 1,838.82
3,553,238.51 369,926.35 3,923,164.86
Page 25
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers
for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total
Amount of $25,175.62 Dated November 24, 2025, Through November 30,
2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $24,067.48 and $1,108.14 for the
City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 26
Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas 05:19 PM
12/01/2025
Page 1 of 1
Company: City & Fire
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Payment Date On or After: 11/24/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 11/30/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier
Name
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount
for Reporting
Transaction
Supplier Payment: Socal
Gas: 11/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
455399 11/26/2025 Socal Gas 24,067.48 0 24,067.48
Supplier Payment: Socal
Gas: 11/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
455398 11/26/2025 Socal Gas 0 1,108.14 1,108.14
24,067.48 1,108.14 25,175.62
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 27
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager/Deputy City Treasurer
Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director
SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of
October 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive
and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of October 31, 2025.
BACKGROUND:
The attached investment schedules as of October 31, 2025, reflect cash and investments
managed by the Finance Department are in conformity with the requirements of California
Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District’s adopted Investment Policies as approved on June 26, 2025.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s and District’s Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to
the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days
following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers
have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council’s core value of providing and
nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of
the City’s investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the
various services the city provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Investment Schedules as of October 31, 2025 (City)
Attachment 2 – Investment Schedules as of October 31, 2025 (Fire)
Page 28
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Portfolio Holdings
PFM Managed Account
PFM Cash Balance
CAMP Pool
State Pool
Passbook/Checking Accounts
Total
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Summary
October 31, 2025
Cash Dividends
and Income
$ 1,863,050.40
$ 1,863,050.40
Closing
Market Value
$ 404,054,549.78
644,236.77
101,280,583.22
792,293.19
8,157,213.58
$ 514,928,876.54
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy
adopted June 27, 2024. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The Investment
Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated expenditures.
The attached Summary of cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents is provided under the City's official Investment
Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds.
Date
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 29
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
October 31, 2025
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JEVIN KAYE
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
73340000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
https://www.pfmam.comOnline Access 1-717-232-2723Customer Service
Tiffany Tint, CFA
Institutional Relationship Manager
633 W 5th Street, Suite/Floor 2560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213-356-2010
tiffany.tint@pfmam.com
Meredith LaBuda Sullivan
Senior Portfolio Manager
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-231-2723
labudam@pfmam.com
Rachael Miller
Client Consultant
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
millerr@pfmam.com
Page 30
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a
representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.
Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and
investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of
each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the
products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The
stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this
statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending
on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable
security has or is still able to be called.
Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share
(normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month
by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning
of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by
365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.
YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based
on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized
basis.
YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the
current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM
according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The
investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.
Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final
consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.
Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your
statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information
about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have
other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated
copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your
client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.
PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide
specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division
of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment
adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank")
and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does
not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a
written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would
like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service
Operations at the address below.
Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.
However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request
is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to
their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting
Service Operations at the address below.
Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our
investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in
pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets
and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the
official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that
clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank
statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.
Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile
due to a timing difference.
Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit
funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing
internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.
Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as
of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be
differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income
and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured
bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be
reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities
could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered
investment company or local government investment program is contained in the
appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.
Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the
amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date
until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities
(those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a
straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is
amortized using the constant yield basis.
Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational
purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine
the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such
information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the
accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or
other taxing authorities.
Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified
of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.
Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be
redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.
Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not
guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain
non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in
securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual
settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for
securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any
changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s
beginning values.
Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected
sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are
distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at
1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA
Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.
Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned,
plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and
losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any
premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may
be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent
the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings
on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on
the actual distribution date.
Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than
investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one
share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a
percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of
the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by
multiplying it by
Page 31
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
52,630,479.35 10.29 Asset-Backed Security
3,121,600.30 0.61 Federal Agency Bond / Note
75,819,815.90 14.82 Corporate Note
1,240,094.70 0.24 Bank Note
4,123,197.70 0.81 Certificate of Deposit
61,737,251.48 12.07 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
2,008,795.18 0.39 Municipal Bond / Note
6,754,330.77 1.32 Corporate Note
198,590,393.00 38.83 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
96,140,346.71 18.80 CAMP Pool
800,948.06 0.16 Local Agency Investment Fund
8,514,114.45 1.66 Passbook/Checking Accounts
$511,481,367.60 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 1,286,535.37 406,025,958.38
CAMP Pool 0.00 96,140,346.71
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 800,948.06
Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 8,514,114.45
$1,286,535.37 $511,481,367.60 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
105,455,409.22
0.00
0.00
1,001,042.00
9,471,755.05
81,178,594.99
104,211,142.03
112,771,974.22
97,391,450.09
0.00
20.62
0.00
0.00
0.20
1.85
15.87
20.37
22.05
19.04
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $511,481,367.60
866
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
10.29%ABS
0.61%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
14.82%
Corporate Note
0.24%
Bank Note
0.81%
Cert of Deposit
12.07%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.39%
Muni Bond / Note
1.32%
Priv Placement
Bond38.83%
US TSY Bond / Note
18.80%
CAMP Pool
0.16%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
1.66%
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
Summary Page 1PFM Asset Management
Page 32
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$404,054,549.78
(296,707.48)
(11,063,621.60)
10,146,435.70
2,886,973.37
298,328.61
$406,025,958.38
1,049,520.70
(183.89)
237,198.56
$1,286,535.37
Total
401,631,422.40
2,759,187.78
11,135,107.13
296,707.48
978,035.17
(13,040,534.24)
(399,757,952.64)
(2,600,714.95)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $1,401,258.13
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
0.00
11,135,107.13
978,035.17
296,707.48
(10,146,619.59)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$2,907,466.96 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340000 Page 1PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 33
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 201,735,000.00 198,590,393.00 48.90
Municipal Bond / Note 1,970,000.00 2,008,795.18 0.49
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
60,755,329.38 61,737,251.48 15.21
Federal Agency Bond / Note 3,110,000.00 3,121,600.30 0.77
Corporate Note 82,135,000.00 82,574,146.67 20.34
Certificate of Deposit 4,100,000.00 4,123,197.70 1.02
Bank Note 1,245,000.00 1,240,094.70 0.31
Asset-Backed Security 52,280,523.61 52,630,479.35 12.96
Managed Account Sub-Total 407,330,852.99 406,025,958.38 100.00%
Accrued Interest 2,759,187.78
Total Portfolio 407,330,852.99 408,785,146.16
Unsettled Trades 2,895,000.00 2,887,993.23
Sector Allocation
12.96%
ABS
0.31%
Bank Note
1.02%
Cert of Deposit
18.67%
Corporate Note
0.77%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
15.21%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.49%
Muni Bond / Note
1.66%
Priv Placement
Bond
48.91%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
0.25%
2.33%
19.99%
25.67%
27.77%
23.99%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1091
4.23%
3.84%
Account 73340000 Page 2PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 34
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
4.16%
A
6.14%
A+
6.07%
A-
0.25%
A-1
0.25%
AA
65.65%
AA+
2.85%
AA-
9.39%
AAA
1.10%
BBB+
4.14%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
2,891,187.13 0.71 Adobe Inc
774,522.60 0.19 Ally Auto Receivables Trust
6,857,508.75 1.69 American Express Co
3,111,480.72 0.77 BA Credit Card Trust
1,607,969.35 0.40 Bank of America Corp
655,459.32 0.16 Bank of New York Mellon Corp
2,766,309.30 0.68 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
2,609,339.60 0.64 BlackRock Inc
1,844,226.42 0.45 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust
3,092,645.48 0.76 Capital One Financial Corp
218,347.34 0.05 Caterpillar Inc
1,959,842.00 0.48 Charles Schwab Corp
1,276,295.68 0.31 Chase Auto Owner Trust
1,130,127.75 0.28 Cintas Corp
1,660,284.54 0.41 Cisco Systems Inc
5,588,357.52 1.38 Citigroup Inc
1,165,471.23 0.29 Colgate-Palmolive Co
2,049,994.00 0.50 Comcast Corp
2,302,503.75 0.57 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA
3,122,155.70 0.77 Credit Agricole Group
191,339.12 0.05 Cummins Inc
821,431.20 0.20 Deere & Co
3,078,859.77 0.76 Depository Trust & Clearing Corp
3,121,600.30 0.77 Federal Home Loan Banks
58,484,278.08 14.40 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
3,252,973.40 0.80 Federal National Mortgage Association
4,320,489.54 1.06 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust
1,594,596.20 0.39 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv
3,289,894.90 0.81 Goldman Sachs Group Inc
1,001,042.00 0.25 Groupe BPCE
4,470,793.20 1.10 Hershey Co
2,142,246.67 0.53 Home Depot Inc
Account 73340000 Page 3PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 35
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
4,904,273.46 1.21 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust
2,774,763.60 0.68 Honda Motor Co Ltd
2,837,144.80 0.70 HSBC Holdings PLC
3,140,702.81 0.77 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2,511,850.00 0.62 International Business Machines Corp
3,512,788.83 0.87 JPMorgan Chase & Co
2,134,566.00 0.53 Kubota Credit Owner Trust
905,462.86 0.22 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA
909,161.70 0.22 Mars Inc
1,572,193.64 0.39 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust
3,065,420.80 0.75 Merck & Co Inc
2,542,102.50 0.63 Meta Platforms Inc
4,052,130.82 1.00 Morgan Stanley
3,000,663.00 0.74 National Australia Bank Ltd
1,401,583.00 0.35 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi
468,539.16 0.12 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust
1,596,929.95 0.39 Northern Trust Corp
2,467,385.00 0.61 PNC Financial Services Group Inc
1,103,332.32 0.27 State of Connecticut
621,400.95 0.15 State Street Corp
2,262,231.70 0.56 Texas Instruments Inc
3,564,283.18 0.88 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
2,327,616.10 0.57 Toyota Motor Corp
5,030,091.30 1.24 Truist Financial Corp
198,590,393.00 48.92 United States Treasury
1,793,664.00 0.44 UnitedHealth Group Inc
3,204,708.35 0.79 USAA Auto Owner Trust
2,809,655.55 0.69 Verizon Master Trust
2,360,709.00 0.58 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust
1,034,967.48 0.25 Walmart Inc
5,071,670.96 1.25 WF Card Issuance Trust
$406,025,958.38 Total 100.00%
Account 73340000 Page 4PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 36
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
1,398,733.25 1,412,419.84 44.60 1,334,381.84 05/23/2205/20/22Aa1AA+ 1,435,000.00 91282CDG3 2.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
1,949,454.00 1,940,917.85 62.15 1,884,687.50 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CDG3 4.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
2,186,078.08 2,202,511.04 20,557.07 2,128,873.05 06/09/2206/08/22Aa1AA+ 2,225,000.00 912828U24 3.05
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
3,930,028.00 3,915,024.26 36,956.52 3,836,250.00 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 912828U24 4.11
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
1,363,959.80 1,356,572.57 7,363.39 1,318,734.38 11/08/2411/07/24Aa1AA+ 1,400,000.00 91282CDK4 4.22
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
2,820,474.02 2,896,784.19 15,226.43 2,903,255.27 12/03/2112/01/21Aa1AA+ 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4 1.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2021 1.250% 12/31/2026
1,579,995.63 1,623,059.28 6,844.43 1,616,684.57 01/05/2201/03/22Aa1AA+ 1,625,000.00 91282CDQ1 1.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2026
3,442,588.16 3,410,104.89 20,756.52 3,223,412.50 11/10/2311/08/23Aa1AA+ 3,520,000.00 912828YX2 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2020 1.500% 01/31/2027
2,092,975.55 2,084,806.57 8,150.14 1,989,589.84 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,150,000.00 912828Z78 4.11
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
633,536.42 639,616.61 3,076.02 625,398.05 06/06/2206/02/22Aa1AA+ 645,000.00 912828V98 2.95
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
1,915,342.65 1,938,957.61 9,299.59 1,911,152.34 08/03/2208/01/22Aa1AA+ 1,950,000.00 912828V98 2.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3,339,571.80 3,375,854.78 16,214.67 3,313,671.88 07/07/2207/05/22Aa1AA+ 3,400,000.00 912828V98 2.84
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
2,757,152.70 2,742,986.39 5,491.37 2,647,271.48 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,850,000.00 912828ZB9 4.06
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
4,353,399.00 4,313,149.93 8,670.58 4,010,097.66 09/08/2309/05/23Aa1AA+ 4,500,000.00 912828ZB9 4.54
Account 73340000 Page 5PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 37
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
2,217,014.80 2,199,377.40 12,139.50 2,199,054.69 02/05/2502/04/25Aa1AA+ 2,200,000.00 91282CKE0 4.27
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3,237,996.30 3,260,788.59 36,205.84 3,179,214.84 08/24/2208/22/22Aa1AA+ 3,300,000.00 912828X88 3.22
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
1,477,969.50 1,476,152.33 10,424.59 1,472,988.28 08/05/2508/04/25Aa1AA+ 1,500,000.00 91282CFB2 3.70
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
1,576,500.80 1,570,194.36 11,119.57 1,522,000.00 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 1,600,000.00 91282CFB2 3.93
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
1,110,926.07 1,107,323.73 1,006.22 1,066,771.48 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 1,175,000.00 91282CAH4 3.79
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
1,134,562.80 1,133,627.87 1,027.62 1,093,781.25 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,200,000.00 91282CAH4 3.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3,028,242.00 3,035,244.98 10,879.12 3,081,093.75 05/08/2305/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CFM8 3.46
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
987,942.90 976,754.24 14.50 945,492.19 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 1,050,000.00 91282CAU5 4.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
808,124.80 796,412.13 15,244.57 795,031.25 12/31/2412/26/24Aa1AA+ 800,000.00 91282CLX7 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3,115,875.20 3,120,764.00 33,260.87 3,013,625.00 01/30/2301/25/23Aa1AA+ 3,200,000.00 9128283F5 3.58
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
2,514,452.50 2,481,886.13 32,642.66 2,459,667.97 03/08/2303/06/23Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9 4.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
2,514,452.50 2,466,318.54 32,642.66 2,446,093.75 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9 4.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
2,911,458.00 2,854,700.46 5,875.68 2,637,785.16 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,100,000.00 91282CBJ9 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
4,540,758.95 4,499,953.49 40,245.24 4,459,355.47 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 4,550,000.00 91282CGH8 4.04
Account 73340000 Page 6PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 38
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
1,962,968.00 1,939,463.82 11,657.61 1,869,296.88 03/08/2303/06/23Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 9128283W8 4.23
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
2,944,452.00 2,962,820.42 17,486.41 2,921,015.63 04/06/2304/05/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 9128283W8 3.34
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3,312,508.50 3,247,453.55 19,672.21 3,137,299.80 11/10/2311/09/23Aa1AA+ 3,375,000.00 9128283W8 4.59
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
563,041.96 563,353.41 653.85 562,553.91 10/09/2510/08/25Aa1AA+ 595,000.00 91282CBS9 3.57
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
1,608,691.30 1,589,421.19 1,868.13 1,482,984.38 07/07/2307/05/23Aa1AA+ 1,700,000.00 91282CBS9 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
2,484,008.63 2,427,360.46 2,884.62 2,257,089.84 10/04/2310/02/23Aa1AA+ 2,625,000.00 91282CBS9 4.75
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
2,952,188.90 2,923,607.11 9,401.10 2,916,812.50 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 2,950,000.00 91282CGT2 4.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3,683,366.70 3,678,067.73 134.67 3,463,687.50 06/05/2306/01/23Aa1AA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CBZ3 3.77
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 1.250% 05/31/2028
306,350.53 301,798.50 1,709.36 281,010.74 07/11/2307/07/23Aa1AA+ 325,000.00 91282CCE9 4.35
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3,175,530.75 3,102,334.40 14,215.35 2,898,676.76 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 3,375,000.00 91282CCH2 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
4,704,490.00 4,698,596.65 21,059.78 4,681,640.63 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CCH2 3.65
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
6,168,984.00 6,058,470.98 24,395.60 6,093,046.88 12/05/2312/04/23Aa1AA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CJA0 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
7,248,829.00 7,097,440.63 942.68 7,143,828.13 04/03/2404/01/24Aa1AA+ 7,000,000.00 91282CJF9 4.37
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
7,889,688.00 7,755,063.78 115,489.13 7,621,562.50 03/06/2403/04/24Aa1AA+ 8,000,000.00 9128285M8 4.25
Account 73340000 Page 7PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 39
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
4,818,561.60 4,699,295.36 60,652.17 4,660,875.00 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,800,000.00 91282CJR3 4.47
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
1,980,726.30 1,930,570.26 9,287.36 1,864,324.22 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,100,000.00 91282CDW8 4.45
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
4,244,413.50 4,226,759.34 19,901.49 4,080,585.94 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,500,000.00 91282CDW8 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
5,549,448.60 5,380,501.28 31,853.09 5,240,611.33 05/06/2405/02/24Aa1AA+ 5,725,000.00 9128286B1 4.62
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
6,048,491.40 5,893,022.29 13,153.85 5,742,105.47 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 6,300,000.00 91282CEE7 4.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
2,682,110.75 2,660,993.50 218.40 2,632,050.78 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 2,750,000.00 91282CEM9 3.87
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3,901,252.00 3,869,467.95 317.68 3,827,031.25 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 91282CEM9 3.88
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
2,170,350.60 2,161,911.04 24,092.39 2,150,929.69 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 2,200,000.00 91282CEV9 3.76
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
4,932,615.00 4,935,461.33 54,755.43 4,916,796.88 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CEV9 3.63
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
964,336.00 947,683.24 6,633.83 935,156.25 11/05/2411/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CFC0 4.15
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
1,060,769.60 1,066,059.14 7,297.21 1,057,074.22 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,100,000.00 91282CFC0 3.51
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3,278,742.40 3,247,406.56 22,555.03 3,231,992.19 06/04/2505/30/25Aa1AA+ 3,400,000.00 91282CFC0 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
1,108,594.30 1,087,618.47 3,747.25 1,084,789.06 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,100,000.00 91282CFL0 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
2,015,626.00 1,982,115.97 6,813.19 1,977,968.75 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CFL0 4.12
Account 73340000 Page 8PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 40
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.000% 10/31/2029
2,758,849.95 2,710,869.45 301.10 2,707,968.75 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 2,725,000.00 91282CFT3 4.14
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2029
5,039,065.00 5,029,417.37 81,523.22 5,030,468.75 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CFY2 3.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
2,053,672.00 2,003,915.20 29,483.70 2,004,531.25 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CMD0 4.32
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
2,567,090.00 2,501,498.12 36,854.62 2,501,757.81 01/07/2501/02/25Aa1AA+ 2,500,000.00 91282CMD0 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
6,455,059.00 6,356,708.64 57,493.21 6,336,484.38 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 6,500,000.00 91282CGJ4 4.07
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
2,294,429.40 2,249,666.22 7,329.67 2,244,027.34 04/15/2504/11/25Aa1AA+ 2,300,000.00 91282CGS4 4.17
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
4,253,155.20 4,213,051.49 14,769.23 4,214,601.56 04/02/2504/01/25Aa1AA+ 4,200,000.00 91282CMU2 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
2,681,061.55 2,667,647.25 42,207.99 2,667,163.09 07/03/2507/01/25Aa1AA+ 2,675,000.00 91282CHF1 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
4,309,743.80 4,245,872.86 67,848.36 4,241,714.84 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 4,300,000.00 91282CHF1 4.05
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
725,371.92 723,549.88 7,050.82 723,656.25 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 720,000.00 91282CNN7 3.76
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
4,709,880.18 4,720,053.45 45,781.33 4,721,384.77 09/05/2509/04/25Aa1AA+ 4,675,000.00 91282CNN7 3.65
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030
2,042,312.50 2,042,152.34 6,532.97 2,042,152.34 11/03/2510/31/25Aa1AA+ 2,050,000.00 91282CPA3 3.71
1,301,467.21 198,590,393.00 196,730,784.69 3.97 193,284,123.68 201,735,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
905,462.86 890,000.00 18,370.19 890,000.00 05/13/2504/24/25Aa2NR 890,000.00 544647KY5 4.42
Account 73340000 Page 9PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 41
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Municipal Bond / Note
CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
1,103,332.32 1,080,000.00 6,194.82 1,080,000.00 05/07/2504/23/25Aa2AA- 1,080,000.00 20772KZK8 4.49
24,565.01 2,008,795.18 1,970,000.00 4.46 1,970,000.00 1,970,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
1,696,192.79 1,679,221.08 4,859.60 1,623,190.23 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 1,708,621.30 3137BUX60 5.03
FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
1,935,688.16 1,905,124.68 5,216.87 1,835,739.06 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 1,960,000.00 3137FAWS3 4.97
FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3,213,387.45 3,151,464.00 12,649.88 3,152,707.03 08/01/2307/27/23Aa1AA+ 3,150,000.00 3137HACX2 4.80
FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3,174,499.52 3,150,525.31 12,541.89 3,150,489.05 07/27/2307/19/23Aa1AA+ 3,150,567.81 3137HAD45 4.78
FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3,252,973.40 3,179,003.26 11,334.44 3,125,170.83 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 3,246,140.28 3136BQDE6 5.04
FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3,056,418.00 2,959,668.54 11,850.00 2,934,192.00 10/19/2310/11/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 3137HAQ74 5.25
FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3,531,670.30 3,444,116.80 13,465.63 3,423,594.33 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 3,475,000.00 3137HAMH6 4.99
FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
2,382,187.34 2,282,798.29 9,417.08 2,255,712.61 10/31/2310/25/23Aa1AA+ 2,330,000.00 3137HAST4 5.60
FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3,061,956.00 2,943,800.99 12,000.00 2,909,648.43 10/20/2310/17/23Aa1AA+ 3,000,000.00 3137HAMS2 5.50
FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
1,162,245.68 1,127,921.11 4,773.31 1,126,733.17 11/21/2311/14/23Aa1AA+ 1,130,000.00 3137HB3D4 5.14
FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
1,760,592.00 1,716,835.32 6,966.00 1,715,058.44 12/07/2311/28/23Aa1AA+ 1,720,000.00 3137HB3G7 4.93
Account 73340000 Page 10PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 42
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
1,818,980.10 1,802,006.20 6,819.90 1,807,898.21 02/08/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,790,000.00 3137HBLV4 4.34
FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
4,140,936.00 4,028,486.43 17,266.67 4,038,281.25 07/05/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 4,000,000.00 3137HCKV3 4.95
FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
1,325,787.35 1,325,464.79 4,902.45 1,331,073.90 09/12/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,305,000.00 3137HFNZ4 4.06
FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
2,701,796.90 2,686,012.90 10,198.08 2,696,306.10 08/22/2408/13/24Aa1AA+ 2,650,000.00 3137HFF59 4.23
FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3,402,089.12 3,369,261.18 12,663.61 3,376,289.13 08/15/2408/07/24Aa1AA+ 3,345,000.00 3137HDXL9 4.33
FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
2,416,616.22 2,393,004.38 9,402.34 2,402,069.39 10/16/2410/08/24Aa1AA+ 2,355,000.00 3137HH6C0 4.34
FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3,828,095.27 3,746,286.08 14,895.13 3,749,422.11 11/27/2411/19/24Aa1AA+ 3,730,000.00 3137HHJL6 4.67
FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
1,343,946.18 1,324,958.99 4,869.38 1,324,953.63 04/24/2504/15/25Aa1AA+ 1,325,000.00 3137HKXJ8 4.41
FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
2,115,943.49 2,084,983.58 7,697.13 2,084,977.07 03/20/2503/11/25Aa1AA+ 2,085,000.00 3137HKPF5 4.43
FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
2,390,287.32 2,390,222.64 8,676.21 2,390,252.00 09/29/2509/23/25Aa1AA+ 2,355,000.00 3137HN6B9 4.06
FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3,967,142.73 3,924,933.77 14,159.44 3,924,925.42 07/17/2507/09/25Aa1AA+ 3,925,000.00 3137HMC65 4.33
FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4,057,820.16 4,015,895.11 14,291.10 4,015,762.92 07/31/2507/22/25Aa1AA+ 4,020,000.00 3137HMCE8 4.29
230,916.14 61,737,251.48 60,631,995.43 4.72 60,394,446.31 60,755,329.38 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3,121,600.30 3,106,645.99 46,196.46 3,105,863.70 06/13/2506/12/25Aa1AA+ 3,110,000.00 3130B6R24 3.95
Account 73340000 Page 11PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 43
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note
46,196.46 3,121,600.30 3,106,645.99 3.95 3,105,863.70 3,110,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
993,524.00 1,009,728.36 8,159.72 1,062,320.00 11/03/2111/01/21A1A- 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8 1.75
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
993,524.00 984,591.35 8,159.72 936,280.00 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8 5.41
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
1,954,798.00 1,994,748.20 3,755.56 1,970,740.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026
991,059.00 1,010,739.93 2,458.33 1,057,540.00 11/03/2111/01/21A1A 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4 1.72
CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2016 3.200% 10/21/2026
1,190,662.80 1,177,080.63 1,066.67 1,124,628.00 08/10/2308/07/23A3BBB+ 1,200,000.00 172967KY6 5.36
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
2,292,853.90 2,279,860.58 23,367.36 2,228,539.00 09/07/2209/02/22A2BBB+ 2,300,000.00 38141GWB6 4.64
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
2,078,907.60 2,059,277.14 4,360.59 1,949,808.00 03/28/2203/24/22Baa1A- 2,100,000.00 89788MAD4 2.83
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
1,959,842.00 1,971,864.91 7,894.44 1,898,200.00 04/29/2204/27/22A2A- 2,000,000.00 808513BY0 3.60
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/28/2022 2.875% 04/15/2027
1,973,122.00 1,981,136.00 2,555.56 1,936,100.00 05/10/2205/06/22A2A 2,000,000.00 437076CN0 3.59
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.593% 05/04/2027
493,231.00 485,478.44 3,916.13 452,825.00 06/10/2206/08/22A1A- 500,000.00 61772BAB9 3.72
NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
1,596,929.95 1,599,522.96 30,305.00 1,610,407.70 05/12/2205/10/22A2A+ 1,595,000.00 665859AW4 3.79
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
398,592.00 399,933.33 6,824.44 399,784.00 05/20/2205/17/22A2A+ 400,000.00 91324PEG3 3.71
Account 73340000 Page 12PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 44
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
1,395,072.00 1,403,741.40 23,885.56 1,412,488.00 06/06/2206/02/22A2A+ 1,400,000.00 91324PEG3 3.50
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
2,467,385.00 2,487,517.14 35,437.50 2,461,500.00 08/08/2208/04/22A3A- 2,500,000.00 693475AT2 3.50
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
3,000,663.00 2,991,629.30 46,209.17 2,973,990.00 06/13/2206/09/22Aa2AA- 3,000,000.00 63254ABE7 4.10
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.734% 07/22/2027
1,080,557.50 1,050,280.70 5,245.35 986,150.00 08/10/2308/07/23A1A- 1,100,000.00 06051GJS9 4.63
IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/27/2022 4.150% 07/27/2027
2,511,850.00 2,520,628.56 27,090.28 2,561,055.00 08/03/2208/01/22A3A- 2,500,000.00 459200KT7 3.61
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
285,181.50 286,033.12 825.00 260,685.00 08/24/2208/22/22Baa1A- 300,000.00 89788MAC6 4.08
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
1,425,907.50 1,398,959.37 4,125.00 1,226,295.00 10/31/2210/27/22Baa1A- 1,500,000.00 89788MAC6 5.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
2,327,616.10 2,290,659.56 11,918.47 2,275,459.00 10/06/2210/04/22A1A+ 2,300,000.00 89236TKJ3 4.79
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
2,262,231.70 2,242,180.24 32,979.44 2,158,734.00 12/09/2212/07/22Aa3A+ 2,300,000.00 882508BC7 4.30
COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
2,049,994.00 2,035,519.81 49,338.89 2,085,520.00 01/30/2301/25/23A3A- 2,000,000.00 20030NEA5 4.35
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
1,571,851.82 1,544,160.64 4,352.04 1,548,100.40 05/06/2405/02/24A1A- 1,540,000.00 61747YFP5 5.50
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
1,096,864.43 1,076,620.74 1,497.21 1,078,128.25 05/06/2405/02/24A1A 1,075,000.00 46647PEE2 5.49
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
1,130,127.75 1,123,787.37 23,493.75 1,123,560.00 05/02/2504/28/25A3A- 1,125,000.00 17252MAR1 4.25
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
2,423,359.20 2,411,804.78 50,150.00 2,423,880.00 05/08/2305/04/23A1A 2,400,000.00 427866BH0 4.03
Account 73340000 Page 13PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 45
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
191,339.12 189,887.12 3,858.06 189,867.00 05/09/2505/06/25A2A 190,000.00 231021AY2 4.28
META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
2,542,102.50 2,502,387.70 53,027.78 2,504,650.00 06/05/2306/01/23Aa3AA- 2,500,000.00 30303M8L9 4.56
MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
3,065,420.80 3,038,684.72 56,272.50 3,027,826.50 05/22/2305/18/23Aa3A+ 3,050,000.00 58933YBH7 4.21
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
587,694.28 579,763.63 11,087.67 579,727.40 06/03/2505/27/25A2A- 580,000.00 40428HR95 4.67
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
2,249,450.52 2,220,155.30 42,439.00 2,220,177.60 06/03/2505/28/25A2A- 2,220,000.00 40428HR95 4.65
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
819,965.60 798,055.09 12,983.33 796,384.00 07/11/2307/07/23A3A- 800,000.00 02665WEM9 5.23
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
821,431.20 802,939.84 11,770.00 805,360.00 08/10/2308/07/23A1A 800,000.00 24422EXB0 4.79
BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
2,766,309.30 2,683,053.51 30,300.00 2,669,598.00 08/17/2308/14/23A2A 2,700,000.00 05565ECE3 5.31
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028
501,057.50 499,472.71 3,804.17 499,440.00 08/25/2508/19/25A2NR 500,000.00 63743HFZ0 4.19
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
3,564,308.40 3,389,570.39 17,537.96 3,383,136.00 10/04/2310/02/23Aa3A+ 3,400,000.00 17325FBB3 5.92
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
2,302,503.75 2,252,099.38 33,600.00 2,253,150.00 01/12/2401/10/24Aa2A+ 2,250,000.00 21688ABC5 4.77
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
1,424,865.40 1,400,000.00 18,540.47 1,400,000.00 01/24/2501/16/25A1A 1,400,000.00 46647PEU6 4.92
CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
1,660,284.54 1,619,612.13 14,186.25 1,619,433.00 02/26/2402/21/24A1AA- 1,620,000.00 17275RBR2 4.86
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2025 4.729% 04/20/2029
655,459.32 645,000.00 932.01 645,000.00 04/22/2504/14/25Aa2AA- 645,000.00 06405LAH4 4.73
Account 73340000 Page 14PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 46
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
218,347.34 214,547.04 1,959.64 214,417.35 08/16/2408/12/24A2A 215,000.00 14913UAQ3 4.44
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
997,041.00 1,000,000.00 1,153.61 1,000,000.00 10/21/2510/14/25A2BBB+ 1,000,000.00 38141GD27 4.15
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
2,891,187.13 2,791,336.80 39,968.50 2,790,723.65 01/17/2501/14/25A1A+ 2,795,000.00 00724PAJ8 4.98
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
900,525.50 873,839.61 10,106.25 873,661.25 02/07/2502/04/25A2NR 875,000.00 63743HFX5 4.98
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
2,047,434.00 2,005,369.88 17,680.56 2,006,140.00 02/25/2502/24/25A1A 2,000,000.00 427866BL1 4.68
MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
909,161.70 889,149.81 7,120.00 889,038.80 03/12/2503/05/25A2A 890,000.00 571676AY1 4.83
STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
621,400.95 605,000.00 568.67 605,000.00 04/24/2504/22/25Aa3A 605,000.00 857477DB6 4.83
WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
1,034,967.48 1,018,398.34 369.75 1,018,235.40 04/28/2504/23/25Aa2AA 1,020,000.00 931142FN8 4.39
BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
2,609,339.60 2,583,134.68 186.67 2,568,216.00 06/27/2506/26/25Aa3AA- 2,800,000.00 09247XAQ4 4.31
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
1,165,471.23 1,154,446.58 24,120.25 1,154,387.85 05/02/2504/28/25Aa3A+ 1,155,000.00 194162AT0 4.21
NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
3,078,859.77 3,008,291.52 63,268.53 3,008,133.80 05/20/2505/13/25Aa1AA+ 3,010,000.00 637639AQ8 4.71
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
833,386.32 810,000.00 16,805.88 810,000.00 05/29/2505/21/25Aa3A+ 810,000.00 17325FBP2 4.91
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/15/2025 3.950% 09/15/2030
169,124.67 169,404.64 858.03 169,389.70 09/15/2509/08/25A2A 170,000.00 437076DJ8 4.03
913,876.72 82,574,146.67 81,561,084.98 4.37 80,903,809.65 82,135,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Account 73340000 Page 15PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 47
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Certificate of Deposit
NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 02/18/2025 4.510% 02/13/2026
1,001,042.00 1,000,000.00 32,071.11 1,000,000.00 02/18/2502/14/25P-1A-1 1,000,000.00 63873TBC1 4.51
CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
3,122,155.70 3,100,000.00 110,260.11 3,100,000.00 02/05/2402/01/24A1A+ 3,100,000.00 22536DWD6 4.76
142,331.22 4,123,197.70 4,100,000.00 4.70 4,100,000.00 4,100,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Bank Note
TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
1,240,094.70 1,245,000.00 1,144.29 1,245,000.00 10/23/2510/20/25A3A 1,245,000.00 89788JAH2 4.14
1,144.29 1,240,094.70 1,245,000.00 4.14 1,245,000.00 1,245,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
828,990.01 827,775.00 1,124.44 827,744.74 08/21/2408/09/24AaaNR 827,809.55 43813YAB8 4.89
NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
468,539.16 465,084.21 1,225.90 465,043.19 10/25/2310/18/23AaaNR 465,137.61 65480MAD5 5.94
HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
325,998.98 322,542.52 508.06 322,519.64 11/08/2311/01/23AaaNR 322,576.44 438123AC5 5.67
KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
2,134,566.00 2,120,043.70 4,909.33 2,124,363.28 02/12/2502/11/25AaaNR 2,100,000.00 50117DAC0 4.92
TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
1,488,848.78 1,475,000.00 3,199.11 1,474,999.12 07/30/2407/23/24NRAAA 1,475,000.00 89237QAD2 4.88
HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
1,222,361.69 1,214,932.44 2,381.40 1,214,911.06 10/16/2410/08/24NRAAA 1,215,000.00 448976AD2 4.41
HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
3,011,784.00 2,989,593.25 5,773.33 2,987,578.13 01/31/2501/30/25AaaAAA 3,000,000.00 43816DAC9 4.44
BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
3,111,480.72 3,064,880.79 6,715.76 3,064,828.05 06/13/2406/06/24AaaAAA 3,065,000.00 05522RDJ4 4.93
Account 73340000 Page 16PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 48
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
2,122,406.79 2,094,928.82 4,329.67 2,094,904.89 07/23/2407/16/24NRAAA 2,095,000.00 02589BAE0 4.65
GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
980,778.82 974,850.45 1,787.50 974,812.22 10/16/2410/08/24AaaAAA 975,000.00 38014AAD3 4.40
VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
2,360,709.00 2,339,934.68 3,217.50 2,339,920.44 03/25/2503/18/25AaaNR 2,340,000.00 92868MAD1 4.50
BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
1,844,226.42 1,829,849.89 1,390.80 1,829,819.75 02/12/2502/04/25AaaAAA 1,830,000.00 096924AD7 4.56
HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
737,500.47 734,927.73 1,355.67 734,917.90 05/08/2504/29/25AaaNR 735,000.00 437921AD1 4.15
WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
1,764,481.25 1,749,790.26 3,336.67 1,749,739.95 10/24/2410/17/24AaaAAA 1,750,000.00 92970QAE5 4.29
FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
2,862,045.90 2,834,763.92 5,607.00 2,834,724.44 03/25/2503/18/25AaaAAA 2,835,000.00 34535KAD0 4.45
BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
527,411.85 524,968.84 697.81 524,963.78 05/12/2505/06/25AaaNR 525,000.00 05594BAD8 4.35
USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
854,922.20 854,928.47 2,063.88 854,924.93 10/09/2510/02/25AaaAAA 855,000.00 90327HAC3 3.95
MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
1,572,193.64 1,554,720.93 3,303.51 1,554,669.25 01/23/2501/14/25AaaNR 1,555,000.00 58773DAD6 4.78
USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
2,349,786.15 2,349,374.49 5,672.64 2,349,357.42 10/09/2510/07/25AaaAAA 2,350,000.00 90327HAC3 3.96
ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
774,522.60 774,891.28 1,278.75 774,889.33 10/16/2510/07/25NRAAA 775,000.00 02008KAC7 3.96
VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
2,809,655.55 2,789,900.24 3,844.78 2,789,880.03 03/31/2503/25/25AaaNR 2,790,000.00 92348KDY6 4.51
FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
1,458,443.64 1,459,850.98 2,537.16 1,459,842.47 09/26/2509/23/25AaaNR 1,460,000.00 34532BAG6 3.91
Account 73340000 Page 17PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 49
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
1,918,341.12 1,919,701.94 3,310.93 1,919,686.66 09/17/2509/09/25NRAAA 1,920,000.00 44935JAD8 3.88
AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
2,600,296.80 2,574,958.29 4,898.22 2,574,953.39 05/13/2505/06/25NRAAA 2,575,000.00 02582JKP4 4.28
GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
613,817.38 609,918.44 1,087.83 609,910.21 05/14/2505/06/25AaaAAA 610,000.00 362549AD9 4.28
WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
3,307,189.71 3,269,959.65 6,307.47 3,269,945.72 06/10/2506/03/25NRAAA 3,270,000.00 92970QAJ4 4.34
TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
2,075,434.40 2,079,762.25 1,774.93 2,079,760.80 10/23/2510/15/25NRAAA 2,080,000.00 89231GAD0 3.84
COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850% 07/15/2030
845,680.73 844,821.03 0.00 844,821.03 11/05/2510/28/25NRAAA 845,000.00 14043YAD7 3.85
AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
2,134,805.16 2,109,712.85 4,032.44 2,109,695.95 07/22/2507/15/25NRAAA 2,110,000.00 02582JKV1 4.30
COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/16/2030
2,246,964.75 2,249,590.32 10,743.75 2,249,573.40 09/16/2509/09/25NRAAA 2,250,000.00 14041NGF2 3.82
CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
1,276,295.68 1,279,953.65 274.49 1,279,949.31 10/29/2510/17/25AaaNR 1,280,000.00 16144MAD6 3.86
98,690.73 52,630,479.35 52,285,911.31 4.38 52,287,650.48 52,280,523.61 Security Type Sub-Total
407,330,852.99 397,290,893.82 4.23 2,759,187.78 401,631,422.40 406,025,958.38 Managed Account Sub-Total
$407,330,852.99 $397,290,893.82 $2,759,187.78 $401,631,422.40 $406,025,958.38 4.23%
$408,785,146.16
$2,759,187.78
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340000 Page 18PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 50
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(13,686.59) 64,351.41 1,398,733.25 97.47 BMO 1,435,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
3.74 0.98
8,536.15 64,766.50 1,949,454.00 97.47 WellsFar 2,000,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
3.74 0.98
(16,432.96) 57,205.03 2,186,078.08 98.25 BOFAML 2,225,000.00 912828U24US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
3.74 1.01
15,003.74 93,778.00 3,930,028.00 98.25 Citigrou 4,000,000.00 912828U24US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
3.74 1.01
7,387.23 45,225.42 1,363,959.80 97.43 Citigrou 1,400,000.00 91282CDK4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
3.73 1.05
(76,310.17)(82,781.25) 2,820,474.02 97.43 Nomura 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026
3.73 1.05
(43,063.65)(36,688.94) 1,579,995.63 97.23 JPMorgan 1,625,000.00 91282CDQ1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2021 1.250% 12/31/2026
3.72 1.14
32,483.27 219,175.66 3,442,588.16 97.80 BMO 3,520,000.00 912828YX2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2026
3.72 1.13
8,168.98 103,385.71 2,092,975.55 97.35 BOFAML 2,150,000.00 912828Z78US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2020 1.500% 01/31/2027
3.71 1.22
(6,080.19) 8,138.37 633,536.42 98.22 BOFAML 645,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3.68 1.25
(23,614.96) 4,190.31 1,915,342.65 98.22 BOFAML 1,950,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3.68 1.25
(36,282.98) 25,899.92 3,339,571.80 98.22 Citigrou 3,400,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3.68 1.25
14,166.31 109,881.22 2,757,152.70 96.74 MorganSt 2,850,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
3.67 1.30
40,249.07 343,301.34 4,353,399.00 96.74 BMO 4,500,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
3.67 1.30
17,637.40 17,960.11 2,217,014.80 100.77 WellsFar 2,200,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.66 1.32
(22,792.29) 58,781.46 3,237,996.30 98.12 BOFAML 3,300,000.00 912828X88US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3.65 1.48
1,817.17 4,981.22 1,477,969.50 98.53 MorganSt 1,500,000.00 91282CFB2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
3.64 1.68
Account 73340000 Page 19PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 51
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
6,306.44 54,500.80 1,576,500.80 98.53 BMO 1,600,000.00 91282CFB2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
3.64 1.68
3,602.34 44,154.59 1,110,926.07 94.55 BOFAML 1,175,000.00 91282CAH4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
3.63 1.79
934.93 40,781.55 1,134,562.80 94.55 BOFAML 1,200,000.00 91282CAH4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2020 0.500% 08/31/2027
3.63 1.79
(7,002.98)(52,851.75) 3,028,242.00 100.94 Citigrou 3,000,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3.62 1.82
11,188.66 42,450.71 987,942.90 94.09 Citigrou 1,050,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.61 1.95
11,712.67 13,093.55 808,124.80 101.02 WellsFar 800,000.00 91282CLX7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
3.62 1.90
(4,888.80) 102,250.20 3,115,875.20 97.37 Citigrou 3,200,000.00 9128283F5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3.62 1.95
32,566.37 54,784.53 2,514,452.50 100.58 BMO 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
3.61 2.03
48,133.96 68,358.75 2,514,452.50 100.58 BMO 2,500,000.00 91282CGC9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
3.61 2.03
56,757.54 273,672.84 2,911,458.00 93.92 BMO 3,100,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
3.61 2.19
40,805.46 81,403.48 4,540,758.95 99.80 WellsFar 4,550,000.00 91282CGH8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
3.60 2.13
23,504.18 93,671.12 1,962,968.00 98.15 BMO 2,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.61 2.18
(18,368.42) 23,436.37 2,944,452.00 98.15 BMO 3,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.61 2.18
65,054.95 175,208.70 3,312,508.50 98.15 BMO 3,375,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.61 2.18
(311.45) 488.05 563,041.96 94.63 Citigrou 595,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
19,270.11 125,706.92 1,608,691.30 94.63 JPMorgan 1,700,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
56,648.17 226,918.79 2,484,008.63 94.63 BOFAML 2,625,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
Account 73340000 Page 20PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 52
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
28,581.79 35,376.40 2,952,188.90 100.07 WellsFar 2,950,000.00 91282CGT2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.28
5,298.97 219,679.20 3,683,366.70 94.45 BMO 3,900,000.00 91282CBZ3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3.62 2.42
4,552.03 25,339.79 306,350.53 94.26 RBC Capi 325,000.00 91282CCE9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 1.250% 05/31/2028
3.62 2.49
73,196.35 276,853.99 3,175,530.75 94.09 BMO 3,375,000.00 91282CCH2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3.62 2.57
5,893.35 22,849.37 4,704,490.00 94.09 BOFAML 5,000,000.00 91282CCH2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3.62 2.57
110,513.02 75,937.12 6,168,984.00 102.82 BOFAML 6,000,000.00 91282CJA0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
3.61 2.70
151,388.37 105,000.87 7,248,829.00 103.55 BMO 7,000,000.00 91282CJF9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
3.62 2.78
134,624.22 268,125.50 7,889,688.00 98.62 BMO 8,000,000.00 9128285M8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
3.62 2.83
119,266.24 157,686.60 4,818,561.60 100.39 BOFAML 4,800,000.00 91282CJR3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
3.63 2.92
50,156.04 116,402.08 1,980,726.30 94.32 BMO 2,100,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.63 3.10
17,654.16 163,827.56 4,244,413.50 94.32 Nomura 4,500,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.63 3.10
168,947.32 308,837.27 5,549,448.60 96.93 BOFAML 5,725,000.00 9128286B1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
3.63 3.10
155,469.11 306,385.93 6,048,491.40 96.01 Citigrou 6,300,000.00 91282CEE7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
3.64 3.23
21,117.25 50,059.97 2,682,110.75 97.53 Citigrou 2,750,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.65 3.29
31,784.05 74,220.75 3,901,252.00 97.53 BOFAML 4,000,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.65 3.29
8,439.56 19,420.91 2,170,350.60 98.65 BOFAML 2,200,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.38
(2,846.33) 15,818.12 4,932,615.00 98.65 Nomura 5,000,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.38
Account 73340000 Page 21PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 53
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
16,652.76 29,179.75 964,336.00 96.43 BMO 1,000,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.66 3.50
(5,289.54) 3,695.38 1,060,769.60 96.43 Nomura 1,100,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.66 3.50
31,335.84 46,750.21 3,278,742.40 96.43 WellsFar 3,400,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.66 3.50
20,975.83 23,805.24 1,108,594.30 100.78 BOFAML 1,100,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.67 3.59
33,510.03 37,657.25 2,015,626.00 100.78 BMO 2,000,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.67 3.59
47,980.50 50,881.20 2,758,849.95 101.24 WellsFar 2,725,000.00 91282CFT3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.000% 10/31/2029
3.67 3.67
9,647.63 8,596.25 5,039,065.00 100.78 WellsFar 5,000,000.00 91282CFY2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2029
3.68 3.69
49,756.80 49,140.75 2,053,672.00 102.68 Nomura 2,000,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.69 3.74
65,591.88 65,332.19 2,567,090.00 102.68 MorganSt 2,500,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.69 3.74
98,350.36 118,574.62 6,455,059.00 99.31 Citigrou 6,500,000.00 91282CGJ4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
3.69 3.88
44,763.18 50,402.06 2,294,429.40 99.76 WellsFar 2,300,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.70 4.03
40,103.71 38,553.64 4,253,155.20 101.27 Nomura 4,200,000.00 91282CMU2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
3.70 4.01
13,414.30 13,898.46 2,681,061.55 100.23 Citigrou 2,675,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.71 4.11
63,870.94 68,028.96 4,309,743.80 100.23 BMO 4,300,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.71 4.11
1,822.04 1,715.67 725,371.92 100.75 WellsFar 720,000.00 91282CNN7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
3.71 4.27
(10,173.27)(11,504.59) 4,709,880.18 100.75 WellsFar 4,675,000.00 91282CNN7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
3.71 4.27
Account 73340000 Page 22PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 54
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
160.16 160.16 2,042,312.50 99.63 WellsFar 2,050,000.00 91282CPA3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625%
09/30/2030
3.72 4.45
5,306,269.32 3.66 1,859,608.31 198,590,393.00 201,735,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.64
Municipal Bond / Note
15,462.86 15,462.86 905,462.86 101.74 RaymondJ 890,000.00 544647KY5LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
3.74 2.45
23,332.32 23,332.32 1,103,332.32 102.16 Barclays 1,080,000.00 20772KZK8CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
3.81 3.09
38,795.18 3.78 38,795.18 2,008,795.18 1,970,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.80
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
16,971.71 73,002.56 1,696,192.79 99.27 Barclays 1,708,621.30 3137BUX60FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3.89 1.06
30,563.48 99,949.10 1,935,688.16 98.76 TD Secur 1,960,000.00 3137FAWS3FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3.85 1.61
61,923.45 60,680.42 3,213,387.45 102.01 SAN 3,150,000.00 3137HACX2FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3.89 2.36
23,974.21 24,010.47 3,174,499.52 100.76 JPMorgan 3,150,567.81 3137HAD45FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
4.12 1.56
73,970.14 127,802.57 3,252,973.40 100.21 JPMorgan 3,246,140.28 3136BQDE6FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
4.03 2.49
96,749.46 122,226.00 3,056,418.00 101.88 BMO 3,000,000.00 3137HAQ74FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3.93 2.53
87,553.50 108,075.97 3,531,670.30 101.63 WellsFar 3,475,000.00 3137HAMH6FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3.93 2.50
99,389.05 126,474.73 2,382,187.34 102.24 MorganSt 2,330,000.00 3137HAST4FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3.93 2.61
118,155.01 152,307.57 3,061,956.00 102.07 PNCBank 3,000,000.00 3137HAMS2FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3.93 2.56
Account 73340000 Page 23PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 55
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
34,324.57 35,512.51 1,162,245.68 102.85 JPMorgan 1,130,000.00 3137HB3D4FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3.93 2.64
43,756.68 45,533.56 1,760,592.00 102.36 BOFAML 1,720,000.00 3137HB3G7FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3.92 2.67
16,973.90 11,081.89 1,818,980.10 101.62 JPMorgan 1,790,000.00 3137HBLV4FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3.93 2.76
112,449.57 102,654.75 4,140,936.00 103.52 WellsFar 4,000,000.00 3137HCKV3FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3.98 3.02
322.56 (5,286.55) 1,325,787.35 101.59 BOFAML 1,305,000.00 3137HFNZ4FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
4.00 3.36
15,784.00 5,490.80 2,701,796.90 101.95 MorganSt 2,650,000.00 3137HFF59FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3.99 3.34
32,827.94 25,799.99 3,402,089.12 101.71 BMO 3,345,000.00 3137HDXL9FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
4.00 3.35
23,611.84 14,546.83 2,416,616.22 102.62 MorganSt 2,355,000.00 3137HH6C0FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
4.00 3.46
81,809.19 78,673.16 3,828,095.27 102.63 JPMorgan 3,730,000.00 3137HHJL6FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
4.00 3.47
18,987.19 18,992.55 1,343,946.18 101.43 JPMorgan 1,325,000.00 3137HKXJ8FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
4.00 3.78
30,959.91 30,966.42 2,115,943.49 101.48 MorganSt 2,085,000.00 3137HKPF5FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
4.02 3.86
64.68 35.32 2,390,287.32 101.50 JPMorgan 2,355,000.00 3137HN6B9FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
4.03 3.90
42,208.96 42,217.31 3,967,142.73 101.07 GoldmanS 3,925,000.00 3137HMC65FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
4.04 4.10
41,925.05 42,057.24 4,057,820.16 100.94 JPMorgan 4,020,000.00 3137HMCE8FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4.03 4.18
1,342,805.17 3.98 1,105,256.05 61,737,251.48 60,755,329.38 Security Type Sub-Total 2.98
Federal Agency Bond / Note
14,954.31 15,736.60 3,121,600.30 100.37 Nomura 3,110,000.00 3130B6R24FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3.65 1.51
Account 73340000 Page 24PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 56
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
15,736.60 3.65 14,954.31 3,121,600.30 3,110,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.51
Corporate Note
(16,204.36)(68,796.00) 993,524.00 99.35 SUSQ 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.06 0.72
8,932.65 57,244.00 993,524.00 99.35 SEEL 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.06 0.72
(39,950.20)(15,942.00) 1,954,798.00 97.74 RBC Capi 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
4.04 0.84
(19,680.93)(66,481.00) 991,059.00 99.11 07/01/26SUSQ 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026
3.96 0.88
13,582.17 66,034.80 1,190,662.80 99.22 07/21/26RBS 1,200,000.00 172967KY6CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2016 3.200% 10/21/2026
3.99 0.91
12,993.32 64,314.90 2,292,853.90 99.69 01/26/26MorganSt 2,300,000.00 38141GWB6GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
4.13 0.89
19,630.46 129,099.60 2,078,907.60 99.00 03/02/26GoldmanS 2,100,000.00 89788MAD4TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
4.78 0.34
(12,022.91) 61,642.00 1,959,842.00 97.99 02/03/27CSFirstB 2,000,000.00 808513BY0CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
4.02 1.29
(8,014.00) 37,022.00 1,973,122.00 98.66 03/15/27Scotiaca 2,000,000.00 437076CN0HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/28/2022 2.875% 04/15/2027
3.84 1.39
7,752.56 40,406.00 493,231.00 98.65 05/04/26BOFAML 500,000.00 61772BAB9MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.593% 05/04/2027
4.89 0.49
(2,593.01)(13,477.75) 1,596,929.95 100.12 04/10/27JPMorgan 1,595,000.00 665859AW4NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
3.94 1.39
(1,341.33)(1,192.00) 398,592.00 99.65 04/15/27BOFAML 400,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
3.96 1.42
(8,669.40)(17,416.00) 1,395,072.00 99.65 04/15/27JPMorgan 1,400,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
3.96 1.42
(20,132.14) 5,885.00 2,467,385.00 98.70 04/19/27JANE 2,500,000.00 693475AT2PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
4.03 1.45
9,033.70 26,673.00 3,000,663.00 100.02 JPMorgan 3,000,000.00 63254ABE7NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
3.90 1.52
30,276.80 94,407.50 1,080,557.50 98.23 07/22/26JANE 1,100,000.00 06051GJS9BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.734% 07/22/2027
4.85 0.71
Account 73340000 Page 25PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 57
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(8,778.56)(49,205.00) 2,511,850.00 100.47 06/27/27BNPPSA 2,500,000.00 459200KT7IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/27/2022 4.150% 07/27/2027
3.86 1.60
(851.62) 24,496.50 285,181.50 95.06 06/03/27JANE 300,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.09 1.70
26,948.13 199,612.50 1,425,907.50 95.06 06/03/27GoldmanS 1,500,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.09 1.70
36,956.54 52,157.10 2,327,616.10 101.20 Citigrou 2,300,000.00 89236TKJ3TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
3.89 1.79
20,051.46 103,497.70 2,262,231.70 98.36 08/03/27MorganSt 2,300,000.00 882508BC7TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
3.76 1.84
14,474.19 (35,526.00) 2,049,994.00 102.50 10/15/27TD Secur 2,000,000.00 20030NEA5COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
4.03 1.81
27,691.18 23,751.42 1,571,851.82 102.07 04/13/27JANE 1,540,000.00 61747YFP5MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
4.62 1.38
20,243.69 18,736.18 1,096,864.43 102.03 04/22/27MAXE 1,075,000.00 46647PEE2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
4.55 1.41
6,340.38 6,567.75 1,130,127.75 100.46 04/01/28MUFG 1,125,000.00 17252MAR1CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
4.02 2.31
11,554.42 (520.80) 2,423,359.20 100.97 04/04/28GoldmanS 2,400,000.00 427866BH0HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
3.85 2.27
1,452.00 1,472.12 191,339.12 100.70 04/09/28JPMorgan 190,000.00 231021AY2CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
3.93 2.28
39,714.80 37,452.50 2,542,102.50 101.68 04/15/28JPMorgan 2,500,000.00 30303M8L9META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
3.90 2.28
26,736.08 37,594.30 3,065,420.80 100.51 04/17/28Citigrou 3,050,000.00 58933YBH7MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
3.83 2.31
7,930.65 7,966.88 587,694.28 101.33 HSBC 580,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.09 2.37
29,295.22 29,272.92 2,249,450.52 101.33 HSBC 2,220,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.09 2.37
21,910.51 23,581.60 819,965.60 102.50 GoldmanS 800,000.00 02665WEM9AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
4.13 2.45
18,491.36 16,071.20 821,431.20 102.68 GoldmanS 800,000.00 24422EXB0JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
3.90 2.48
Account 73340000 Page 26PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 58
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
83,255.79 96,711.30 2,766,309.30 102.46 07/11/28Barclays 2,700,000.00 05565ECE3BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
4.11 2.49
1,584.79 1,617.50 501,057.50 100.21 07/25/28MUFG 500,000.00 63743HFZ0NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028
4.06 2.57
174,738.01 181,172.40 3,564,308.40 104.83 08/29/28GoldmanS 3,400,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
4.02 2.60
50,404.37 49,353.75 2,302,503.75 102.33 MIZU 2,250,000.00 21688ABC5COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
4.00 2.90
24,865.40 24,865.40 1,424,865.40 101.78 01/24/28JPMorgan 1,400,000.00 46647PEU6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
4.37 2.08
40,672.41 40,851.54 1,660,284.54 102.49 01/26/29Citigrou 1,620,000.00 17275RBR2CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
4.02 2.98
10,459.32 10,459.32 655,459.32 101.62 04/20/28BOFAML 645,000.00 06405LAH4BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2025 4.729% 04/20/2029
4.41 2.31
3,800.30 3,929.99 218,347.34 101.56 BOFAML 215,000.00 14913UAQ3CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
3.94 3.44
(2,959.00)(2,959.00) 997,041.00 99.70 10/21/28GoldmanS 1,000,000.00 38141GD27GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
4.48 2.77
99,850.33 100,463.48 2,891,187.13 103.44 12/17/29BOFAML 2,795,000.00 00724PAJ8ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
4.04 3.70
26,685.89 26,864.25 900,525.50 102.92 01/07/30RBC Capi 875,000.00 63743HFX5NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
4.19 3.75
42,064.12 41,294.00 2,047,434.00 102.37 01/24/30TD Secur 2,000,000.00 427866BL1HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
4.15 3.81
20,011.89 20,122.90 909,161.70 102.15 02/01/30BOFAML 890,000.00 571676AY1MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
4.23 3.82
16,400.95 16,400.95 621,400.95 102.71 03/24/30MorganSt 605,000.00 857477DB6STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
4.15 3.96
16,569.14 16,732.08 1,034,967.48 101.47 03/28/30BOFAML 1,020,000.00 931142FN8WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
3.97 4.02
26,204.92 41,123.60 2,609,339.60 93.19 01/30/30JANE 2,800,000.00 09247XAQ4BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
4.08 4.17
11,024.65 11,083.38 1,165,471.23 100.91 04/01/30Citigrou 1,155,000.00 194162AT0COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
3.98 4.04
Account 73340000 Page 27PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 59
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
70,568.25 70,725.97 3,078,859.77 102.29 04/20/30BOFAML 3,010,000.00 637639AQ8NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
4.16 3.96
23,386.32 23,386.32 833,386.32 102.89 04/29/30Citigrou 810,000.00 17325FBP2CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
4.20 3.96
(279.97)(265.03) 169,124.67 99.49 08/15/30JPMorgan 170,000.00 437076DJ8HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/15/2025 3.950% 09/15/2030
4.06 4.35
1,670,337.02 4.07 1,013,061.69 82,574,146.67 82,135,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.21
Certificate of Deposit
1,042.00 1,042.00 1,001,042.00 100.10 NAT 1,000,000.00 63873TBC1NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 02/18/2025 4.510% 02/13/2026
4.04 0.28
22,155.70 22,155.70 3,122,155.70 100.71 CRAG 3,100,000.00 22536DWD6CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
4.12 1.19
23,197.70 4.10 23,197.70 4,123,197.70 4,100,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.97
Bank Note
(4,905.30)(4,905.30) 1,240,094.70 99.61 10/23/28Suntrust 1,245,000.00 89788JAH2TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
4.50 2.78
(4,905.30) 4.50 (4,905.30) 1,240,094.70 1,245,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.78
Asset-Backed Security
1,215.01 1,245.27 828,990.01 100.14 JPMorgan 827,809.55 43813YAB8HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
4.10 0.20
3,454.95 3,495.97 468,539.16 100.73 MIZU 465,137.61 65480MAD5NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
4.37 0.47
3,456.46 3,479.34 325,998.98 101.06 JPMorgan 322,576.44 438123AC5HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
4.23 0.73
14,522.30 10,202.72 2,134,566.00 101.65 WellsFar 2,100,000.00 50117DAC0KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
4.06 1.32
13,848.78 13,849.66 1,488,848.78 100.94 MUFG 1,475,000.00 89237QAD2TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
4.01 1.05
Account 73340000 Page 28PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 60
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
7,429.25 7,450.63 1,222,361.69 100.61 Barclays 1,215,000.00 448976AD2HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
3.98 1.34
22,190.75 24,205.87 3,011,784.00 100.39 BOFAML 3,000,000.00 43816DAC9HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
4.01 1.18
46,599.93 46,652.67 3,111,480.72 101.52 BOFAML 3,065,000.00 05522RDJ4BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
3.93 1.45
27,477.97 27,501.90 2,122,406.79 101.31 Citigrou 2,095,000.00 02589BAE0AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
3.88 1.61
5,928.37 5,966.60 980,778.82 100.59 MIZU 975,000.00 38014AAD3GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
3.90 1.14
20,774.32 20,788.56 2,360,709.00 100.89 Barclays 2,340,000.00 92868MAD1VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
4.02 1.62
14,376.53 14,406.67 1,844,226.42 100.78 WellsFar 1,830,000.00 096924AD7BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
4.03 1.34
2,572.74 2,582.57 737,500.47 100.34 JPMorgan 735,000.00 437921AD1HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
3.99 1.77
14,690.99 14,741.30 1,764,481.25 100.83 WellsFar 1,750,000.00 92970QAE5WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
3.87 1.84
27,281.98 27,321.46 2,862,045.90 100.95 SGAS 2,835,000.00 34535KAD0FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
3.92 1.69
2,443.01 2,448.07 527,411.85 100.46 BOFAML 525,000.00 05594BAD8BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
3.97 1.53
(6.27)(2.73) 854,922.20 99.99 JPMorgan 855,000.00 90327HAC3USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
3.99 1.93
17,472.71 17,524.39 1,572,193.64 101.11 SGAS 1,555,000.00 58773DAD6MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
4.00 1.35
411.66 428.73 2,349,786.15 99.99 TD Secur 2,350,000.00 90327HAC3USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
3.99 1.93
(368.68)(366.73) 774,522.60 99.94 Barclays 775,000.00 02008KAC7ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
4.03 1.95
19,755.31 19,775.52 2,809,655.55 100.70 BOFAML 2,790,000.00 92348KDY6VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
4.20 1.84
(1,407.34)(1,398.83) 1,458,443.64 99.89 Barclays 1,460,000.00 34532BAG6FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
3.99 2.17
Account 73340000 Page 29PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 61
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
(1,360.82)(1,345.54) 1,918,341.12 99.91 Citigrou 1,920,000.00 44935JAD8HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
3.96 2.12
25,338.51 25,343.41 2,600,296.80 100.98 RBC Capi 2,575,000.00 02582JKP4AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
3.90 2.29
3,898.94 3,907.17 613,817.38 100.63 TD Secur 610,000.00 362549AD9GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
3.97 1.82
37,230.06 37,243.99 3,307,189.71 101.14 WellsFar 3,270,000.00 92970QAJ4WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
3.90 2.36
(4,327.85)(4,326.40) 2,075,434.40 99.78 JPMorgan 2,080,000.00 89231GAD0TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
3.97 2.23
859.70 859.70 845,680.73 100.08 JPMorgan 845,000.00 14043YAD7COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850%
07/15/2030
3.95 2.33
25,092.31 25,109.21 2,134,805.16 101.18 Barclays 2,110,000.00 02582JKV1AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
3.88 2.51
(2,625.57)(2,608.65) 2,246,964.75 99.87 WellsFar 2,250,000.00 14041NGF2COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/16/2030
3.91 2.66
(3,657.97)(3,653.63) 1,276,295.68 99.71 JPMorgan 1,280,000.00 16144MAD6CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
4.06 2.20
342,828.87 3.98 344,568.04 52,630,479.35 52,280,523.61 Security Type Sub-Total 1.78
407,330,852.99 406,025,958.38 8,735,064.56 4,394,535.98 3.84 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.47
Total Investments $408,785,146.16
$2,759,187.78
$406,025,958.38
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $407,330,852.99 $8,735,064.56 $4,394,535.98 3.84% 2.47
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340000 Page 30PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 62
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
10/09/25 USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
90327HAC3 (854,924.93) 0.00 (854,924.93) 855,000.00 10/02/25
10/09/25 USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
90327HAC3 (2,349,357.42) 0.00 (2,349,357.42) 2,350,000.00 10/07/25
10/16/25 ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
02008KAC7 (774,889.33) 0.00 (774,889.33) 775,000.00 10/07/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 (562,553.91)(183.89)(562,737.80) 595,000.00 10/08/25
10/21/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
38141GD27 (1,000,000.00) 0.00 (1,000,000.00) 1,000,000.00 10/14/25
10/23/25 TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
89231GAD0 (2,079,760.80) 0.00 (2,079,760.80) 2,080,000.00 10/15/25
10/29/25 CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
16144MAD6 (1,279,949.31) 0.00 (1,279,949.31) 1,280,000.00 10/17/25
10/23/25 TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
89788JAH2 (1,245,000.00) 0.00 (1,245,000.00) 1,245,000.00 10/20/25
11/05/25 COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850%
07/15/2030
14043YAD7 (844,821.03) 0.00 (844,821.03) 845,000.00 10/28/25
11/03/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625%
09/30/2030
91282CPA3 (2,042,152.34)(6,941.28)(2,049,093.62) 2,050,000.00 10/31/25
(7,125.17)(13,040,534.24)(13,033,409.07) 13,075,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
10/01/25 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026
46625HRV4 0.00 14,750.00 14,750.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 0.00 12,663.61 12,663.61 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
3137HKXJ8 0.00 4,869.38 4,869.38 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 0.00 9,417.08 9,417.08 10/01/25
Account 73340000 Page 31PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 63
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/25/25 FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
3137HN6B9 0.00 8,676.21 8,676.21 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3137HFF59 0.00 10,198.08 10,198.08 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 0.00 6,819.90 6,819.90 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 0.00 12,558.26 12,558.26 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 0.00 6,966.00 6,966.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3137HMC65 0.00 14,159.44 14,159.44 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 0.00 11,850.00 11,850.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
3137HFNZ4 0.00 4,902.45 4,902.45 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 0.00 12,649.87 12,649.87 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 0.00 14,895.13 14,895.13 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 0.00 13,465.63 13,465.63 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3137HAMS2 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
3137HKPF5 0.00 7,697.13 7,697.13 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3137FAWS3 0.00 5,216.87 5,216.87 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3137HCKV3 0.00 17,266.67 17,266.67 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 0.00 4,863.53 4,863.53 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
3137HMCE8 0.00 14,291.10 14,291.10 10/01/25
Account 73340000 Page 32PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 64
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/25/25 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 0.00 4,773.31 4,773.31 10/01/25
10/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 0.00 11,312.68 11,312.68 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 0.00 9,402.34 9,402.34 10/01/25
10/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
MONEY0002 0.00 592.09 592.09 10/02/25
10/13/25 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
61747YFP5 0.00 43,520.40 43,520.40 10/13/25
10/15/25 FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
34532BAG6 0.00 3,012.87 3,012.87 10/15/25
10/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
43816DAC9 0.00 10,825.00 10,825.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
44935JAD8 0.00 5,794.13 5,794.13 10/15/25
10/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
05522RDJ4 0.00 12,592.04 12,592.04 10/15/25
10/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 0.00 73.04 73.04 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
02589BAE0 0.00 8,118.13 8,118.13 10/15/25
10/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
92970QAE5 0.00 6,256.25 6,256.25 10/15/25
10/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
437921AD1 0.00 2,541.87 2,541.87 10/15/25
10/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 0.00 2,536.38 2,536.38 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
02582JKP4 0.00 9,184.17 9,184.17 10/15/25
10/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
50117DAC0 0.00 9,205.00 9,205.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
448976AD2 0.00 4,465.13 4,465.13 10/15/25
Account 73340000 Page 33PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 65
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/15/25 TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
89237QAD2 0.00 5,998.33 5,998.33 10/15/25
10/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
58773DAD6 0.00 6,194.08 6,194.08 10/15/25
10/15/25 WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
92970QAJ4 0.00 11,826.50 11,826.50 10/15/25
10/15/25 HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/28/2022 2.875% 04/15/2027
437076CN0 0.00 28,750.00 28,750.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
34535KAD0 0.00 10,513.12 10,513.12 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
02582JKV1 0.00 7,560.83 7,560.83 10/15/25
10/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 0.00 2,175.67 2,175.67 10/16/25
10/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
38014AAD3 0.00 3,575.00 3,575.00 10/16/25
10/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
92868MAD1 0.00 8,775.00 8,775.00 10/20/25
10/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
05594BAD8 0.00 1,903.13 1,903.13 10/20/25
10/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
92348KDY6 0.00 10,485.75 10,485.75 10/20/25
10/20/25 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
(CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2025 4.729% 04/20/2029
06405LAH4 0.00 15,081.57 15,081.57 10/20/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 0.00 4,197.31 4,197.31 10/21/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 0.00 1,633.60 1,633.60 10/21/25
10/21/25 CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2016 3.200% 10/21/2026
172967KY6 0.00 19,200.00 19,200.00 10/21/25
10/22/25 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
46647PEE2 0.00 29,944.13 29,944.13 10/22/25
Account 73340000 Page 34PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 66
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/24/25 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
857477DB6 0.00 14,622.85 14,622.85 10/24/25
10/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
096924AD7 0.00 6,954.00 6,954.00 10/25/25
10/28/25 WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
931142FN8 0.00 22,185.00 22,185.00 10/28/25
10/30/25 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
09247XAQ4 0.00 33,600.00 33,600.00 10/30/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
91282CBZ3 0.00 24,375.00 24,375.00 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
91282CEM9 0.00 97,031.25 97,031.25 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 0.00 2,625.00 2,625.00 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 0.00 19,321.88 19,321.88 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.000% 10/31/2029
91282CFT3 0.00 54,500.00 54,500.00 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
91282CJF9 0.00 170,625.00 170,625.00 10/31/25
978,035.17 978,035.17 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
PAYDOWNS
10/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 369.44 0.00 369.44 13.76 7.86 369.45 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 1,378.70 0.00 1,378.70 68.93 25.44 1,378.70 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 4,112.72 0.00 4,112.72 0.08 0.03 4,112.75 10/01/25
10/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 48,126.28 0.00 48,126.28 9.77 5.62 48,126.28 10/15/25
10/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 17,356.03 0.00 17,356.03 1.36 0.65 17,356.03 10/15/25
Account 73340000 Page 35PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 67
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
PAYDOWNS
10/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 23,159.02 0.00 23,159.02 4.08 2.46 23,159.02 10/21/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 202,205.29 0.00 202,205.29 15.83 8.61 202,205.29 10/21/25
0.00 50.67 113.81 296,707.48 296,707.48 296,707.52 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 204,421.88 45.43 204,467.31 13,691.02 12.60 FIFO 210,000.00 10/06/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 761,165.04 6,191.58 767,356.62 19,647.46 (5,526.36)FIFO 775,000.00 10/07/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 1,547,641.41 343.99 1,547,985.40 103,536.33 (28.85)FIFO 1,590,000.00 10/07/25
10/09/25 JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
478160DH4 565,639.35 2,665.54 568,304.89 10,961.25 10,897.04 FIFO 555,000.00 10/08/25
10/09/25 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP
(CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
63743HFK3 783,421.10 17,487.56 800,908.66 13,690.60 13,523.42 FIFO 770,000.00 10/08/25
10/16/25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
06051GLE7 1,001,980.00 12,135.56 1,014,115.56 17,770.00 7,611.31 FIFO 1,000,000.00 10/15/25
10/17/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 389,875.00 2,078.80 391,953.80 (7,703.13)(9,617.32)FIFO 400,000.00 10/16/25
10/17/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 1,413,296.88 7,535.67 1,420,832.55 64,966.80 (12,946.71)FIFO 1,450,000.00 10/16/25
10/22/25 NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
63873QP65 2,332,660.00 12,186.17 2,344,846.17 32,660.00 32,660.00 FIFO 2,300,000.00 10/21/25
10/22/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 112,160.94 615.23 112,776.17 5,224.42 (979.79)FIFO 115,000.00 10/21/25
10/29/25 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
24422EWA3 1,951,360.00 10,200.00 1,961,560.00 (37,360.00)(45,929.79)FIFO 2,000,000.00 10/28/25
71,485.53 (10,324.45) 237,084.75 11,135,107.13 11,063,621.60 11,165,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(1,673,079.99) 1,042,395.53 (630,684.46) 237,198.56 (10,273.78)Managed Account Sub-Total
Account 73340000 Page 36PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 68
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Total Security Transactions $237,198.56 ($630,684.46)$1,042,395.53 ($1,673,079.99)($10,273.78)
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340000 Page 37PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 69
Page 70
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
October 31, 2025
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
JEVIN KAYE
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
73340100 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS
https://www.pfmam.comOnline Access 1-717-232-2723Customer Service
Meredith LaBuda Sullivan
Senior Portfolio Manager
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-231-2723
labudam@pfmam.com
Jeremy King
Key Account Manager
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
kingj@pfmam.com
Rachael Miller
Client Consultant
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
millerr@pfmam.com
Tiffany Tint, CFA
Institutional Relationship Manager
633 W 5th Street, Suite/Floor 2560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213-356-2010
tiffany.tint@pfmam.com
Page 71
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a
representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.
Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and
investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of
each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the
products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The
stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this
statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending
on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable
security has or is still able to be called.
Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share
(normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month
by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning
of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by
365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.
YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based
on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized
basis.
YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the
current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time
period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM
according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The
investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.
Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final
consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.
Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your
statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information
about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have
other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated
copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your
client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.
PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide
specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division
of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment
adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank")
and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does
not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a
written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would
like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service
Operations at the address below.
Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.
However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request
is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to
their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting
Service Operations at the address below.
Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our
investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in
pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets
and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the
official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that
clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank
statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.
Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile
due to a timing difference.
Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit
funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing
internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.
Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as
of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be
differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income
and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured
bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be
reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities
could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered
investment company or local government investment program is contained in the
appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.
Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the
amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date
until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities
(those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a
straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is
amortized using the constant yield basis.
Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational
purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine
the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such
information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the
accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or
other taxing authorities.
Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified
of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.
Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be
redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.
Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not
guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain
non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in
securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual
settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for
securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any
changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s
beginning values.
Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected
sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are
distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at
1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA
Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.
Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned,
plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and
losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any
premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may
be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent
the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings
on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on
the actual distribution date.
Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than
investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one
share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a
percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of
the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by
multiplying it by
Page 72
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
8,698,601.73 9.01 Asset-Backed Security
622,312.60 0.64 Federal Agency Bond / Note
12,729,355.73 13.18 Corporate Note
652,959.80 0.68 Bank Note
594,216.73 0.62 Certificate of Deposit
9,906,964.28 10.26 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
326,299.93 0.34 Municipal Bond / Note
1,095,039.98 1.13 Corporate Note
31,877,391.08 33.01 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
29,923,432.43 30.98 CAMP Pool
148,994.61 0.15 Local Agency Investment Fund
$96,575,568.90 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 205,971.81 66,503,141.86
CAMP Pool 0.00 29,923,432.43
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 148,994.61
$205,971.81 $96,575,568.90 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
30,072,427.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,466,904.25
13,076,319.27
16,427,410.23
18,377,129.68
16,155,378.43
0.00
31.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
13.54
17.01
19.03
16.73
0.00
Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $96,575,568.90
756
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
9.01%ABS
0.64%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
13.18%
Corporate Note
0.68%
Bank Note
0.62%
Cert of Deposit
10.26%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.34%
Muni Bond / Note
1.13%
Priv Placement
Bond33.01%
US TSY Bond / Note
30.98%
CAMP Pool
0.15%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
Summary Page 1PFM Asset Management
Page 73
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$66,159,688.00
(49,708.65)
(2,622,418.76)
2,632,796.62
339,204.73
43,579.92
$66,503,141.86
146,598.55
(4,920.86)
64,294.12
$205,971.81
Total
65,783,583.73
455,088.51
2,635,789.65
49,708.65
133,227.66
(2,977,599.41)
(65,461,142.30)
(396,584.34)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $222,072.15
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
0.00
2,635,789.65
133,227.66
49,708.65
(2,637,717.48)
0.00
0.00
Cash Balance
$343,378.04 Closing Cash Balance
Account 73340100 Page 1PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 74
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Portfolio Summary and Statistics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 32,400,000.00 31,877,391.08 47.93
Municipal Bond / Note 320,000.00 326,299.93 0.49
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
9,760,473.45 9,906,964.28 14.90
Federal Agency Bond / Note 620,000.00 622,312.60 0.94
Corporate Note 13,740,000.00 13,824,395.71 20.79
Certificate of Deposit 590,000.00 594,216.73 0.89
Bank Note 650,000.00 652,959.80 0.98
Asset-Backed Security 8,641,130.40 8,698,601.73 13.08
Managed Account Sub-Total 66,721,603.86 66,503,141.86 100.00%
Accrued Interest 455,088.51
Total Portfolio 66,721,603.86 66,958,230.37
Unsettled Trades 340,000.00 339,362.78
Sector Allocation
13.08%
ABS
0.98%
Bank Note
0.89%
Cert of Deposit
19.14%
Corporate Note
0.94%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
14.90%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.49%
Muni Bond / Note
1.65%
Priv Placement
Bond
47.93%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
0.00%
3.71%
19.67%
24.70%
27.63%
24.29%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1098
4.24%
3.84%
Account 73340100 Page 2PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 75
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
3.46%
A
8.34%
A+
5.42%
A-
0.71%
AA
64.49%
AA+
2.61%
AA-
9.47%
AAA
1.28%
BBB+
4.22%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
475,830.44 0.72 Adobe Inc
124,923.00 0.19 Ally Auto Receivables Trust
304,296.00 0.46 Amazon.com Inc
1,332,603.77 2.00 American Express Co
507,582.50 0.76 BA Credit Card Trust
85,390.49 0.13 Bank of America Corp
461,051.55 0.69 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
419,358.15 0.63 BlackRock Inc
297,293.33 0.45 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust
499,627.14 0.75 Capital One Financial Corp
96,479.06 0.15 Caterpillar Inc
293,976.30 0.44 Charles Schwab Corp
209,392.26 0.31 Chase Auto Owner Trust
185,843.23 0.28 Cintas Corp
276,714.09 0.42 Cisco Systems Inc
1,029,463.83 1.55 Citigroup Inc
186,677.21 0.28 Colgate-Palmolive Co
435,623.73 0.66 Comcast Corp
378,633.95 0.57 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA
594,216.73 0.89 Credit Agricole Group
30,211.44 0.05 Cummins Inc
485,866.58 0.73 Depository Trust & Clearing Corp
622,312.60 0.94 Federal Home Loan Banks
9,332,910.15 14.03 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
574,054.13 0.86 Federal National Mortgage Association
699,084.86 1.05 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust
261,574.12 0.39 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv
682,908.71 1.03 Goldman Sachs Group Inc
736,251.62 1.11 Hershey Co
94,510.85 0.14 Home Depot Inc
823,489.04 1.24 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust
502,966.90 0.76 Honda Motor Co Ltd
Account 73340100 Page 3PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 76
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Issuer Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
466,102.36 0.70 HSBC Holdings PLC
510,943.96 0.77 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
122,240.50 0.18 International Business Machines Corp
336,196.27 0.51 JPMorgan Chase & Co
355,761.00 0.53 Kubota Credit Owner Trust
147,519.23 0.22 Los Angeles Unified School District/CA
148,121.85 0.22 Mars Inc
267,930.11 0.40 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust
477,401.60 0.72 Merck & Co Inc
457,578.45 0.69 Meta Platforms Inc
463,403.40 0.70 Morgan Stanley
400,088.40 0.60 National Australia Bank Ltd
253,505.02 0.38 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi
86,499.54 0.13 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust
400,484.00 0.60 Northern Trust Corp
255,587.25 0.38 PepsiCo Inc
271,412.35 0.41 PNC Financial Services Group Inc
178,780.70 0.27 State of Connecticut
148,930.81 0.22 State Street Corp
393,431.60 0.59 Texas Instruments Inc
566,539.99 0.85 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
808,945.47 1.22 Toyota Motor Corp
891,988.85 1.34 Truist Financial Corp
31,877,391.08 47.94 United States Treasury
313,891.20 0.47 UnitedHealth Group Inc
619,943.58 0.93 USAA Auto Owner Trust
458,205.48 0.69 Verizon Master Trust
378,318.75 0.57 Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust
167,421.21 0.25 Walmart Inc
403,944.80 0.61 Wells Fargo & Co
833,515.29 1.25 WF Card Issuance Trust
$66,503,141.86 Total 100.00%
Account 73340100 Page 4PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 77
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
194,945.40 194,176.32 6.22 188,554.69 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 200,000.00 91282CDG3 4.14
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
925,990.65 948,841.97 29.52 944,248.04 11/18/2111/17/21Aa1AA+ 950,000.00 91282CDG3 1.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
577,021.70 570,575.47 6,812.50 565,948.24 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 575,000.00 91282CJT9 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
928,252.30 923,945.70 10,959.24 922,904.30 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 925,000.00 91282CJT9 4.10
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.125% 01/31/2027
698,502.11 694,013.19 7,245.09 693,452.54 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 695,000.00 91282CMH1 4.24
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
687,558.90 696,036.06 3,338.32 686,054.69 08/03/2208/01/22Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 912828V98 2.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
677,195.40 670,934.43 1,348.76 623,792.97 09/08/2309/05/23Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 912828ZB9 4.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
302,320.20 301,003.19 1,655.39 301,277.34 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CKE0 3.99
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
428,286.95 424,879.73 2,345.13 424,817.38 02/05/2502/04/25Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 91282CKE0 4.27
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
539,666.05 535,239.88 6,034.31 526,968.75 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 912828X88 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
492,656.50 490,685.74 3,474.86 475,625.00 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CFB2 3.93
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
252,353.50 252,070.78 906.59 252,236.33 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 250,000.00 91282CFM8 3.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2020 0.375% 09/30/2027
282,316.50 279,683.08 98.90 269,636.72 10/31/2410/28/24Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CAL5 4.09
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
429,000.95 429,927.42 1,541.21 432,570.31 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 91282CFM8 3.49
Account 73340100 Page 5PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 78
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
470,449.00 469,256.97 6.91 425,820.31 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CAU5 3.91
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
752,718.40 744,193.71 11.05 720,375.00 12/05/2412/02/24Aa1AA+ 800,000.00 91282CAU5 4.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
141,421.84 139,372.12 2,667.80 139,130.47 12/31/2412/26/24Aa1AA+ 140,000.00 91282CLX7 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
803,311.58 804,571.97 8,575.07 776,950.20 01/30/2301/25/23Aa1AA+ 825,000.00 9128283F5 3.58
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
774,823.50 759,718.67 1,563.69 701,991.21 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 825,000.00 91282CBJ9 4.67
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
981,484.00 987,606.81 5,828.80 973,671.88 04/06/2304/05/23Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 9128283W8 3.34
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
89,897.46 89,947.18 104.40 89,819.53 10/09/2510/08/25Aa1AA+ 95,000.00 91282CBS9 3.57
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
283,886.70 280,486.09 329.67 261,703.13 07/07/2307/05/23Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CBS9 4.26
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
473,144.50 462,354.38 549.45 429,921.88 10/04/2310/02/23Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CBS9 4.75
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
525,389.55 520,302.96 1,673.08 519,093.75 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CGT2 4.02
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
613,894.45 613,011.29 22.44 577,281.25 06/05/2306/01/23Aa1AA+ 650,000.00 91282CBZ3 3.77
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
729,195.95 712,353.24 3,264.27 665,561.53 11/06/2311/03/23Aa1AA+ 775,000.00 91282CCH2 4.66
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 1.000% 07/31/2028
676,147.33 670,674.27 1,832.20 634,601.56 01/05/2401/03/24Aa1AA+ 725,000.00 91282CCR0 4.01
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
1,007,600.72 989,550.26 3,984.62 995,197.66 12/05/2312/04/23Aa1AA+ 980,000.00 91282CJA0 4.26
Account 73340100 Page 6PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 79
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
724,882.90 720,478.12 94.27 731,308.59 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 700,000.00 91282CJF9 3.83
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
700,209.81 688,261.91 10,249.66 676,413.67 03/06/2403/04/24Aa1AA+ 710,000.00 9128285M8 4.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
1,581,090.53 1,547,094.66 19,901.49 1,534,517.58 04/03/2404/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,575,000.00 91282CJR3 4.35
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
259,380.83 252,812.77 1,216.20 244,137.70 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 275,000.00 91282CDW8 4.45
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
518,761.65 516,603.92 2,432.40 498,738.28 02/05/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 91282CDW8 3.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
1,235,903.40 1,198,277.58 7,093.92 1,167,123.05 05/06/2405/02/24Aa1AA+ 1,275,000.00 9128286B1 4.62
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
1,152,093.60 1,122,480.44 2,505.49 1,093,734.38 06/05/2406/03/24Aa1AA+ 1,200,000.00 91282CEE7 4.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
180,432.91 175,541.74 14.69 172,310.16 07/02/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 185,000.00 91282CEM9 4.47
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
975,313.00 967,366.99 79.42 956,757.81 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CEM9 3.88
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
271,293.83 271,450.37 3,011.55 270,423.83 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 275,000.00 91282CEV9 3.63
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
517,924.58 515,910.59 5,749.32 513,290.04 09/05/2409/03/24Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CEV9 3.76
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
337,517.60 334,291.85 2,321.84 332,705.08 06/04/2505/30/25Aa1AA+ 350,000.00 91282CFC0 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
472,524.64 474,880.89 3,250.58 470,878.52 10/03/2410/01/24Aa1AA+ 490,000.00 91282CFC0 3.51
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
529,101.83 526,866.00 1,788.46 527,009.77 07/03/2507/01/25Aa1AA+ 525,000.00 91282CFL0 3.78
Account 73340100 Page 7PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 80
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
629,883.13 617,965.04 2,129.12 616,357.42 11/05/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 625,000.00 91282CFL0 4.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2029
302,343.90 301,765.04 4,891.39 301,828.13 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CFY2 3.72
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
385,063.50 375,734.10 5,528.19 375,849.61 02/06/2502/03/25Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 91282CMD0 4.32
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
708,516.84 690,413.48 10,171.88 690,485.16 01/07/2501/02/25Aa1AA+ 690,000.00 91282CMD0 4.36
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
978,189.71 963,285.85 8,712.43 960,221.09 03/05/2503/03/25Aa1AA+ 985,000.00 91282CGJ4 4.07
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
114,721.47 112,861.48 366.48 112,655.08 05/13/2505/12/25Aa1AA+ 115,000.00 91282CGS4 4.09
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
319,224.96 312,997.04 1,019.78 312,212.50 04/15/2504/11/25Aa1AA+ 320,000.00 91282CGS4 4.17
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
703,795.92 697,159.71 2,443.96 697,416.21 04/02/2504/01/25Aa1AA+ 695,000.00 91282CMU2 3.92
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
601,359.60 592,447.38 9,467.21 591,867.19 06/12/2506/11/25Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 91282CHF1 4.05
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
473,506.67 474,529.44 4,602.62 474,663.28 09/05/2509/04/25Aa1AA+ 470,000.00 91282CNN7 3.65
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
503,730.50 502,465.20 4,896.40 502,539.06 09/04/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CNN7 3.76
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
634,700.43 635,379.13 6,169.46 635,463.28 10/02/2510/01/25Aa1AA+ 630,000.00 91282CNN7 3.68
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2023 4.125% 08/31/2030
127,241.25 127,707.54 883.11 127,724.61 10/20/2510/15/25Aa1AA+ 125,000.00 91282CHW4 3.63
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030
199,250.00 199,234.38 637.36 199,234.38 11/03/2510/31/25Aa1AA+ 200,000.00 91282CPA3 3.71
Account 73340100 Page 8PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 81
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
197,838.17 31,877,391.08 31,571,675.52 3.98 31,007,072.12 32,400,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Municipal Bond / Note
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
147,519.23 145,000.00 2,992.90 145,000.00 05/13/2504/24/25Aa2NR 145,000.00 544647KY5 4.42
CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
178,780.70 175,000.00 1,003.79 175,000.00 05/07/2504/23/25Aa2AA- 175,000.00 20772KZK8 4.49
3,996.69 326,299.93 320,000.00 4.46 320,000.00 320,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
307,496.94 304,420.20 880.98 294,262.56 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 309,750.06 3137BUX60 5.03
FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
345,658.60 340,200.84 931.58 327,810.55 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 350,000.00 3137FAWS3 4.97
FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
597,378.59 592,867.12 2,360.14 592,860.31 07/27/2307/19/23Aa1AA+ 592,875.11 3137HAD45 4.78
FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
612,073.80 600,278.86 2,409.50 600,515.63 08/01/2307/27/23Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 3137HACX2 4.80
FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
574,054.13 561,000.58 2,000.20 551,500.74 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 572,848.28 3136BQDE6 5.04
FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
560,343.30 542,605.90 2,172.50 537,935.20 10/19/2310/11/23Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 3137HAQ74 5.25
FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
609,784.80 594,667.65 2,325.00 591,124.20 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 600,000.00 3137HAMH6 4.99
FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
460,079.10 440,883.79 1,818.75 435,652.65 10/31/2310/25/23Aa1AA+ 450,000.00 3137HAST4 5.60
FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
226,277.92 219,595.26 929.32 219,363.98 11/21/2311/14/23Aa1AA+ 220,000.00 3137HB3D4 5.14
FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
327,552.00 319,411.22 1,296.00 319,080.64 12/07/2311/28/23Aa1AA+ 320,000.00 3137HB3G7 4.93
Account 73340100 Page 9PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 82
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
294,695.10 291,945.14 1,104.90 292,899.71 02/08/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 290,000.00 3137HBLV4 4.34
FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
310,570.20 302,136.48 1,295.00 302,871.09 07/05/2407/01/24Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 3137HCKV3 4.95
FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
218,424.74 218,371.59 807.68 219,295.70 09/12/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 215,000.00 3137HFNZ4 4.06
FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
433,307.05 430,775.65 1,635.54 432,426.45 08/22/2408/13/24Aa1AA+ 425,000.00 3137HFF59 4.23
FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
559,386.85 553,989.13 2,082.21 555,144.70 08/15/2408/07/24Aa1AA+ 550,000.00 3137HDXL9 4.33
FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
369,419.04 365,809.59 1,437.30 367,195.32 10/16/2410/08/24Aa1AA+ 360,000.00 3137HH6C0 4.34
FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
610,647.91 597,597.91 2,376.03 598,098.17 11/27/2411/19/24Aa1AA+ 595,000.00 3137HHJL6 4.67
FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
213,002.79 209,993.50 771.75 209,992.65 04/24/2504/15/25Aa1AA+ 210,000.00 3137HKXJ8 4.41
FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
365,342.76 359,997.17 1,329.00 359,996.04 03/20/2503/11/25Aa1AA+ 360,000.00 3137HKPF5 4.43
FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
395,843.76 395,833.05 1,436.83 395,837.91 09/29/2509/23/25Aa1AA+ 390,000.00 3137HN6B9 4.06
FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
596,334.83 589,990.04 2,128.43 589,988.79 07/17/2507/09/25Aa1AA+ 590,000.00 3137HMC65 4.33
FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
403,763.20 399,591.55 1,422.00 399,578.40 07/31/2507/22/25Aa1AA+ 400,000.00 3137HMCE8 4.29
FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290% 07/01/2030
515,526.87 509,302.51 1,823.25 509,270.19 08/07/2507/29/25Aa1AA+ 510,000.00 3137HMCK4 4.32
36,773.89 9,906,964.28 9,741,264.73 4.68 9,702,701.58 9,760,473.45 Security Type Sub-Total
Account 73340100 Page 10PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 83
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
622,312.60 619,331.35 9,209.58 619,175.40 06/13/2506/12/25Aa1AA+ 620,000.00 3130B6R24 3.95
9,209.58 622,312.60 619,331.35 3.95 619,175.40 620,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Corporate Note
CITIGROUP INC
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
169,458.38 171,736.47 2,890.00 187,113.90 05/27/2105/25/21A3BBB+ 170,000.00 172967KN0 1.29
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
108,026.82 109,967.68 457.19 109,755.80 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 110,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
245,515.50 246,654.37 1,039.06 228,305.00 05/16/2205/12/22A1A+ 250,000.00 89236TJK2 3.42
MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
223,542.90 221,533.05 1,835.94 210,663.00 07/07/2307/05/23A1A- 225,000.00 61761J3R8 5.41
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
195,479.80 199,474.82 375.56 197,074.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 200,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/04/2021 1.650% 11/04/2026
220,016.48 221,066.15 1,825.31 207,758.25 06/03/2206/01/22A2A- 225,000.00 025816CM9 3.54
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
433,648.46 431,191.02 4,419.48 421,484.55 09/07/2209/02/22A2BBB+ 435,000.00 38141GWB6 4.64
IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/09/2022 2.200% 02/09/2027
122,240.50 123,910.26 626.39 120,833.75 03/28/2203/24/22A3A- 125,000.00 459200KM2 2.94
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
272,237.90 269,667.24 571.03 255,332.00 03/28/2203/24/22Baa1A- 275,000.00 89788MAD4 2.83
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
293,976.30 295,779.74 1,184.17 284,730.00 04/29/2204/27/22A2A- 300,000.00 808513BY0 3.60
NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
400,484.00 401,613.49 7,600.00 405,484.00 05/16/2205/12/22A2A+ 400,000.00 665859AW4 3.70
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
64,771.20 64,989.17 1,108.97 64,964.90 05/20/2205/17/22A2A+ 65,000.00 91324PEG3 3.71
Account 73340100 Page 11PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 84
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
249,120.00 250,925.67 4,265.28 253,095.00 06/03/2206/01/22A2A+ 250,000.00 91324PEG3 3.43
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
271,412.35 273,626.89 3,898.13 270,765.00 08/08/2208/04/22A3A- 275,000.00 693475AT2 3.50
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
400,088.40 398,883.91 6,161.22 396,532.00 06/13/2206/09/22Aa2AA- 400,000.00 63254ABE7 4.10
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
180,614.95 181,154.31 522.50 165,100.50 08/24/2208/22/22Baa1A- 190,000.00 89788MAC6 4.08
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
190,121.00 186,527.92 550.00 163,506.00 10/31/2210/27/22Baa1A- 200,000.00 89788MAC6 5.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
455,403.15 448,172.52 2,331.88 445,198.50 10/06/2210/04/22A1A+ 450,000.00 89236TKJ3 4.79
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
393,431.60 389,944.39 5,735.56 375,432.00 12/09/2212/07/22Aa3A+ 400,000.00 882508BC7 4.30
COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
435,623.73 432,547.96 10,484.51 443,173.00 01/30/2301/25/23A3A- 425,000.00 20030NEA5 4.35
AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/01/2022 4.550% 12/01/2027
304,296.00 301,099.61 5,687.50 302,691.00 12/09/2212/07/22A1AA 300,000.00 023135CP9 4.35
MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
239,860.50 235,634.90 664.11 236,236.10 05/06/2405/02/24A1A- 235,000.00 61747YFP5 5.50
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
132,644.07 130,196.00 181.06 130,378.30 05/06/2405/02/24A1A 130,000.00 46647PEE2 5.49
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
185,843.23 184,800.59 3,863.42 184,763.20 05/02/2504/28/25A3A- 185,000.00 17252MAR1 4.25
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
429,136.52 427,090.43 8,880.73 429,228.75 05/08/2305/04/23A1A 425,000.00 427866BH0 4.03
CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
30,211.44 29,982.18 609.17 29,979.00 05/09/2505/06/25A2A 30,000.00 231021AY2 4.28
Account 73340100 Page 12PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 85
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
457,578.45 450,429.79 9,545.00 450,837.00 06/05/2306/01/23Aa3AA- 450,000.00 30303M8L9 4.56
MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
477,401.60 473,237.78 8,763.75 471,546.75 05/22/2305/18/23Aa3A+ 475,000.00 58933YBH7 4.21
HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
466,102.36 460,032.18 8,793.67 460,036.80 06/03/2505/28/25A2A- 460,000.00 40428HR95 4.65
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
307,487.10 299,270.66 4,868.75 298,644.00 07/11/2307/07/23A3A- 300,000.00 02665WEM9 5.23
BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
461,051.55 447,175.58 5,050.00 444,933.00 08/17/2308/14/23A2A 450,000.00 05565ECE3 5.31
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028
140,296.10 139,852.36 1,065.17 139,843.20 08/25/2508/19/25A2NR 140,000.00 63743HFZ0 4.19
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
602,787.45 573,236.17 2,965.98 572,148.00 10/04/2310/02/23Aa3A+ 575,000.00 17325FBB3 5.92
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
378,633.95 370,345.23 5,525.33 370,518.00 01/12/2401/10/24Aa2A+ 370,000.00 21688ABC5 4.77
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
203,552.20 200,000.00 2,648.64 200,000.00 01/24/2501/16/25A1A 200,000.00 46647PEU6 4.92
CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
276,714.09 269,935.36 2,364.38 269,905.50 02/26/2402/21/24A1AA- 270,000.00 17275RBR2 4.86
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
96,479.06 94,799.85 865.89 94,742.55 08/16/2408/12/24A2A 95,000.00 14913UAQ3 4.44
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
249,260.25 250,000.00 288.40 250,000.00 10/21/2510/14/25A2BBB+ 250,000.00 38141GD27 4.15
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
475,830.44 459,397.11 6,578.00 459,296.20 01/17/2501/14/25A1A+ 460,000.00 00724PAJ8 4.98
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
113,208.92 109,854.12 1,270.50 109,831.70 02/07/2502/04/25A2NR 110,000.00 63743HFX5 4.98
Account 73340100 Page 13PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 86
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Corporate Note
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
255,587.25 248,758.84 2,683.33 248,570.00 02/10/2502/07/25A1A+ 250,000.00 713448GB8 4.73
HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
307,115.10 300,805.48 2,652.08 300,921.00 02/25/2502/24/25A1A 300,000.00 427866BL1 4.68
MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
148,121.85 144,861.49 1,160.00 144,843.40 03/12/2503/05/25A2A 145,000.00 571676AY1 4.83
STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
148,930.81 145,000.00 136.29 145,000.00 04/24/2504/22/25Aa3A 145,000.00 857477DB6 4.83
WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
167,421.21 164,740.91 59.81 164,714.55 04/28/2504/23/25Aa2AA 165,000.00 931142FN8 4.39
BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
419,358.15 415,146.65 30.00 412,749.00 06/27/2506/26/25Aa3AA- 450,000.00 09247XAQ4 4.31
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
186,677.21 184,911.36 3,863.42 184,901.95 05/02/2504/28/25Aa3A+ 185,000.00 194162AT0 4.21
NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
485,866.58 474,730.39 9,984.24 474,705.50 05/20/2505/13/25Aa1AA+ 475,000.00 637639AQ8 4.71
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
257,218.00 250,000.00 5,187.00 250,000.00 05/29/2505/21/25Aa3A+ 250,000.00 17325FBP2 4.91
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/15/2025 3.950% 09/15/2030
94,510.85 94,667.30 479.49 94,658.95 09/15/2509/08/25A2A 95,000.00 437076DJ8 4.03
164,597.29 13,824,395.71 13,649,359.35 4.40 13,532,924.55 13,740,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Certificate of Deposit
CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
594,216.73 590,000.00 20,984.99 590,000.00 02/05/2402/01/24A1A+ 590,000.00 22536DWD6 4.76
20,984.99 594,216.73 590,000.00 4.76 590,000.00 590,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Bank Note
Account 73340100 Page 14PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 87
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Bank Note
WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
403,944.80 399,938.55 5,086.67 399,760.00 08/09/2308/03/23Aa2A+ 400,000.00 94988J6D4 5.47
TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
249,015.00 250,000.00 229.78 250,000.00 10/23/2510/20/25A3A 250,000.00 89788JAH2 4.14
5,316.45 652,959.80 649,938.55 4.96 649,760.00 650,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
134,201.25 134,004.56 182.03 133,999.66 08/21/2408/09/24AaaNR 134,010.15 43813YAB8 4.89
NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
86,499.54 85,861.70 226.32 85,854.13 10/25/2310/18/23AaaNR 85,871.56 65480MAD5 5.94
HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
61,898.54 61,242.25 96.47 61,237.90 11/08/2311/01/23AaaNR 61,248.69 438123AC5 5.67
KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
355,761.00 353,340.62 818.22 354,060.55 02/12/2502/11/25AaaNR 350,000.00 50117DAC0 4.92
TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
242,253.36 240,000.00 520.53 239,999.86 07/30/2407/23/24NRAAA 240,000.00 89237QAD2 4.88
HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
201,211.80 199,988.88 392.00 199,985.36 10/16/2410/08/24NRAAA 200,000.00 448976AD2 4.41
BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
507,582.50 499,980.55 1,095.56 499,971.95 06/13/2406/06/24AaaAAA 500,000.00 05522RDJ4 4.93
HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
501,964.00 498,265.54 962.22 497,929.69 01/31/2501/30/25AaaAAA 500,000.00 43816DAC9 4.44
AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
349,513.29 344,988.28 713.00 344,984.34 07/23/2407/16/24NRAAA 345,000.00 02589BAE0 4.65
GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
160,948.32 159,975.46 293.33 159,969.18 10/16/2410/08/24AaaAAA 160,000.00 38014AAD3 4.40
VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
378,318.75 374,989.53 515.63 374,987.25 03/25/2503/18/25AaaNR 375,000.00 92868MAD1 4.50
Account 73340100 Page 15PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 88
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
297,293.33 294,975.80 224.20 294,970.94 02/12/2502/04/25AaaAAA 295,000.00 096924AD7 4.56
HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
125,425.25 124,987.71 230.56 124,986.04 05/08/2504/29/25AaaNR 125,000.00 437921AD1 4.15
WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
282,317.00 279,966.44 533.87 279,958.39 10/24/2410/17/24AaaAAA 280,000.00 92970QAE5 4.29
FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
459,340.70 454,962.11 899.89 454,955.77 03/25/2503/18/25AaaAAA 455,000.00 34535KAD0 4.45
BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
85,390.49 84,994.96 112.98 84,994.14 05/12/2505/06/25AaaNR 85,000.00 05594BAD8 4.35
USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
119,989.08 119,989.96 289.67 119,989.46 10/09/2510/02/25AaaAAA 120,000.00 90327HAC3 3.95
MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
267,930.11 264,952.44 562.98 264,943.63 01/23/2501/14/25AaaNR 265,000.00 58773DAD6 4.78
USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
499,954.50 499,866.91 1,206.94 499,863.28 10/09/2510/07/25AaaAAA 500,000.00 90327HAC3 3.96
ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
124,923.00 124,982.46 206.25 124,982.15 10/16/2510/07/25NRAAA 125,000.00 02008KAC7 3.96
VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
458,205.48 454,983.73 627.02 454,980.44 03/31/2503/25/25AaaNR 455,000.00 92348KDY6 4.51
FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
239,744.16 239,975.50 417.07 239,974.10 09/26/2509/23/25AaaNR 240,000.00 34532BAG6 3.91
HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
309,732.16 309,951.88 534.58 309,949.41 09/17/2509/09/25NRAAA 310,000.00 44935JAD8 3.88
AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
419,076.96 414,993.28 789.42 414,992.49 05/13/2505/06/25NRAAA 415,000.00 02582JKP4 4.28
GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
100,625.80 99,986.63 178.33 99,985.28 05/14/2505/06/25AaaAAA 100,000.00 362549AD9 4.28
Account 73340100 Page 16PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 89
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle
Par
Asset-Backed Security
WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
551,198.29 544,993.27 1,051.24 544,990.95 06/10/2506/03/25NRAAA 545,000.00 92970QAJ4 4.34
TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
324,286.63 324,962.85 277.33 324,962.63 10/23/2510/15/25NRAAA 325,000.00 89231GAD0 3.84
COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850% 07/15/2030
140,112.78 139,970.35 0.00 139,970.35 11/05/2510/28/25NRAAA 140,000.00 14043YAD7 3.85
AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
343,997.04 339,953.73 649.78 339,951.01 07/22/2507/15/25NRAAA 340,000.00 02582JKV1 4.30
COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/16/2030
359,514.36 359,934.45 1,719.00 359,931.74 09/16/2509/09/25NRAAA 360,000.00 14041NGF2 3.82
CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
209,392.26 209,992.40 45.03 209,991.68 10/29/2510/17/25AaaNR 210,000.00 16144MAD6 3.86
16,371.45 8,698,601.73 8,642,014.23 4.38 8,642,303.75 8,641,130.40 Security Type Sub-Total
66,721,603.86 65,063,937.40 4.24 455,088.51 65,783,583.73 66,503,141.86 Managed Account Sub-Total
$66,721,603.86 $65,063,937.40 $455,088.51 $65,783,583.73 $66,503,141.86 4.24%
$66,958,230.37
$455,088.51
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340100 Page 17PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 90
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
769.08 6,390.71 194,945.40 97.47 BMO 200,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
3.74 0.98
(22,851.32)(18,257.39) 925,990.65 97.47 Citigrou 950,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
3.74 0.98
6,446.23 11,073.46 577,021.70 100.35 Nomura 575,000.00 91282CJT9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
3.69 1.16
4,306.60 5,348.00 928,252.30 100.35 MorganSt 925,000.00 91282CJT9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/16/2024 4.000% 01/15/2027
3.69 1.16
4,488.92 5,049.57 698,502.11 100.50 MorganSt 695,000.00 91282CMH1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.125% 01/31/2027
3.70 1.20
(8,477.16) 1,504.21 687,558.90 98.22 BOFAML 700,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
3.68 1.25
6,260.97 53,402.43 677,195.40 96.74 BMO 700,000.00 912828ZB9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/02/2020 1.125% 02/28/2027
3.67 1.30
1,317.01 1,042.86 302,320.20 100.77 WellsFar 300,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.66 1.32
3,407.22 3,469.57 428,286.95 100.77 WellsFar 425,000.00 91282CKE0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/15/2024 4.250% 03/15/2027
3.66 1.32
4,426.17 12,697.30 539,666.05 98.12 WellsFar 550,000.00 912828X88US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2017 2.375% 05/15/2027
3.65 1.48
1,970.76 17,031.50 492,656.50 98.53 BMO 500,000.00 91282CFB2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
3.64 1.68
282.72 117.17 252,353.50 100.94 MorganSt 250,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3.62 1.82
2,633.42 12,679.78 282,316.50 94.11 BOFAML 300,000.00 91282CAL5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2020 0.375% 09/30/2027
3.61 1.87
(926.47)(3,569.36) 429,000.95 100.94 WellsFar 425,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
3.62 1.82
1,192.03 44,628.69 470,449.00 94.09 BOFAML 500,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.61 1.95
8,524.69 32,343.40 752,718.40 94.09 Citigrou 800,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
3.61 1.95
2,049.72 2,291.37 141,421.84 101.02 WellsFar 140,000.00 91282CLX7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2024 4.125% 11/15/2027
3.62 1.90
Account 73340100 Page 18PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 91
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(1,260.39) 26,361.38 803,311.58 97.37 Citigrou 825,000.00 9128283F5US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2017 2.250% 11/15/2027
3.62 1.95
15,104.83 72,832.29 774,823.50 93.92 BMO 825,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
3.61 2.19
(6,122.81) 7,812.12 981,484.00 98.15 BMO 1,000,000.00 9128283W8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2018 2.750% 02/15/2028
3.61 2.18
(49.72) 77.93 89,897.46 94.63 Citigrou 95,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
3,400.61 22,183.57 283,886.70 94.63 JPMorgan 300,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
10,790.12 43,222.62 473,144.50 94.63 BOFAML 500,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.34
5,086.59 6,295.80 525,389.55 100.07 WellsFar 525,000.00 91282CGT2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
3.61 2.28
883.16 36,613.20 613,894.45 94.45 BMO 650,000.00 91282CBZ3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
3.62 2.42
16,842.71 63,634.42 729,195.95 94.09 MorganSt 775,000.00 91282CCH2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2021 1.250% 06/30/2028
3.62 2.57
5,473.06 41,545.77 676,147.33 93.26 WellsFar 725,000.00 91282CCR0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/02/2021 1.000% 07/31/2028
3.62 2.66
18,050.46 12,403.06 1,007,600.72 102.82 BOFAML 980,000.00 91282CJA0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/02/2023 4.625% 09/30/2028
3.61 2.70
4,404.78 (6,425.69) 724,882.90 103.55 Citigrou 700,000.00 91282CJF9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
3.62 2.78
11,947.90 23,796.14 700,209.81 98.62 BMO 710,000.00 9128285M8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
3.62 2.83
33,995.87 46,572.95 1,581,090.53 100.39 BMO 1,575,000.00 91282CJR3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/02/2024 3.750% 12/31/2028
3.63 2.92
6,568.06 15,243.13 259,380.83 94.32 BMO 275,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.63 3.10
2,157.73 20,023.37 518,761.65 94.32 Nomura 550,000.00 91282CDW8US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2022 1.750% 01/31/2029
3.63 3.10
37,625.82 68,780.35 1,235,903.40 96.93 BOFAML 1,275,000.00 9128286B1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
3.63 3.10
Account 73340100 Page 19PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 92
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
29,613.16 58,359.22 1,152,093.60 96.01 Citigrou 1,200,000.00 91282CEE7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2022 2.375% 03/31/2029
3.64 3.23
4,891.17 8,122.75 180,432.91 97.53 BMO 185,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.65 3.29
7,946.01 18,555.19 975,313.00 97.53 BOFAML 1,000,000.00 91282CEM9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
3.65 3.29
(156.54) 870.00 271,293.83 98.65 Nomura 275,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.38
2,013.99 4,634.54 517,924.58 98.65 BOFAML 525,000.00 91282CEV9US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2022 3.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.38
3,225.75 4,812.52 337,517.60 96.43 WellsFar 350,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.66 3.50
(2,356.25) 1,646.12 472,524.64 96.43 Nomura 490,000.00 91282CFC0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/01/2022 2.625% 07/31/2029
3.66 3.50
2,235.83 2,092.06 529,101.83 100.78 BOFAML 525,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.67 3.59
11,918.09 13,525.71 629,883.13 100.78 BOFAML 625,000.00 91282CFL0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 3.875% 09/30/2029
3.67 3.59
578.86 515.77 302,343.90 100.78 WellsFar 300,000.00 91282CFY2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2029
3.68 3.69
9,329.40 9,213.89 385,063.50 102.68 Nomura 375,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.69 3.74
18,103.36 18,031.68 708,516.84 102.68 MorganSt 690,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
3.69 3.74
14,903.86 17,968.62 978,189.71 99.31 Citigrou 985,000.00 91282CGJ4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2030
3.69 3.88
1,859.99 2,066.39 114,721.47 99.76 WellsFar 115,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.70 4.03
6,227.92 7,012.46 319,224.96 99.76 WellsFar 320,000.00 91282CGS4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2030
3.70 4.03
6,636.21 6,379.71 703,795.92 101.27 Nomura 695,000.00 91282CMU2US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
3.70 4.01
8,912.22 9,492.41 601,359.60 100.23 BMO 600,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
3.71 4.11
Account 73340100 Page 20PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 93
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(1,022.77)(1,156.61) 473,506.67 100.75 WellsFar 470,000.00 91282CNN7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
3.71 4.27
1,265.30 1,191.44 503,730.50 100.75 WellsFar 500,000.00 91282CNN7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
3.71 4.27
(678.70)(762.85) 634,700.43 100.75 BMO 630,000.00 91282CNN7US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
3.71 4.27
(466.29)(483.36) 127,241.25 101.79 MorganSt 125,000.00 91282CHW4US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2023 4.125% 08/31/2030
3.73 4.33
15.62 15.62 199,250.00 99.63 WellsFar 200,000.00 91282CPA3US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625%
09/30/2030
3.72 4.45
870,318.96 3.65 305,715.56 31,877,391.08 32,400,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.68
Municipal Bond / Note
2,519.23 2,519.23 147,519.23 101.74 RaymondJ 145,000.00 544647KY5LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-B
DTD 05/13/2025 4.423% 07/01/2028
3.74 2.45
3,780.70 3,780.70 178,780.70 102.16 Barclays 175,000.00 20772KZK8CONNECTICUT ST-A-TXBL
DTD 05/07/2025 4.489% 03/15/2029
3.81 3.09
6,299.93 3.78 6,299.93 326,299.93 320,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.80
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
3,076.74 13,234.38 307,496.94 99.27 Barclays 309,750.06 3137BUX60FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3.89 1.06
5,457.76 17,848.05 345,658.60 98.76 TD Secur 350,000.00 3137FAWS3FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3.85 1.61
4,511.47 4,518.28 597,378.59 100.76 JPMorgan 592,875.11 3137HAD45FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
4.12 1.56
11,794.94 11,558.17 612,073.80 102.01 SAN 600,000.00 3137HACX2FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3.89 2.36
13,053.55 22,553.39 574,054.13 100.21 JPMorgan 572,848.28 3136BQDE6FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
4.03 2.49
Account 73340100 Page 21PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 94
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
17,737.40 22,408.10 560,343.30 101.88 BMO 550,000.00 3137HAQ74FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3.93 2.53
15,117.15 18,660.60 609,784.80 101.63 WellsFar 600,000.00 3137HAMH6FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3.93 2.50
19,195.31 24,426.45 460,079.10 102.24 MorganSt 450,000.00 3137HAST4FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3.93 2.61
6,682.66 6,913.94 226,277.92 102.85 JPMorgan 220,000.00 3137HB3D4FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3.93 2.64
8,140.78 8,471.36 327,552.00 102.36 BOFAML 320,000.00 3137HB3G7FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3.92 2.67
2,749.96 1,795.39 294,695.10 101.62 JPMorgan 290,000.00 3137HBLV4FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3.93 2.76
8,433.72 7,699.11 310,570.20 103.52 WellsFar 300,000.00 3137HCKV3FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3.98 3.02
53.15 (870.96) 218,424.74 101.59 BOFAML 215,000.00 3137HFNZ4FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
4.00 3.36
2,531.40 880.60 433,307.05 101.95 MorganSt 425,000.00 3137HFF59FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3.99 3.34
5,397.72 4,242.15 559,386.85 101.71 BMO 550,000.00 3137HDXL9FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
4.00 3.35
3,609.45 2,223.72 369,419.04 102.62 MorganSt 360,000.00 3137HH6C0FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
4.00 3.46
13,050.00 12,549.74 610,647.91 102.63 JPMorgan 595,000.00 3137HHJL6FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
4.00 3.47
3,009.29 3,010.14 213,002.79 101.43 JPMorgan 210,000.00 3137HKXJ8FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
4.00 3.78
5,345.59 5,346.72 365,342.76 101.48 MorganSt 360,000.00 3137HKPF5FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
4.02 3.86
10.71 5.85 395,843.76 101.50 JPMorgan 390,000.00 3137HN6B9FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
4.03 3.90
6,344.79 6,346.04 596,334.83 101.07 GoldmanS 590,000.00 3137HMC65FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
4.04 4.10
4,171.65 4,184.80 403,763.20 100.94 JPMorgan 400,000.00 3137HMCE8FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
4.03 4.18
Account 73340100 Page 22PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 95
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
6,224.36 6,256.68 515,526.87 101.08 BOFAML 510,000.00 3137HMCK4FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290% 07/01/2030
4.01 4.18
204,262.70 3.98 165,699.55 9,906,964.28 9,760,473.45 Security Type Sub-Total 2.98
Federal Agency Bond / Note
2,981.25 3,137.20 622,312.60 100.37 Nomura 620,000.00 3130B6R24FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
DTD 06/13/2025 3.875% 06/04/2027
3.65 1.51
3,137.20 3.65 2,981.25 622,312.60 620,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.51
Corporate Note
(2,278.09)(17,655.52) 169,458.38 99.68 JPMorgan 170,000.00 172967KN0CITIGROUP INC
DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026
4.11 0.49
(1,940.86)(1,728.98) 108,026.82 98.21 JPMorgan 110,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
4.06 0.62
(1,138.87) 17,210.50 245,515.50 98.21 JANE 250,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026
4.06 0.62
2,009.85 12,879.90 223,542.90 99.35 SEEL 225,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY
DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026
4.06 0.72
(3,995.02)(1,594.20) 195,479.80 97.74 RBC Capi 200,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026
4.04 0.84
(1,049.67) 12,258.23 220,016.48 97.79 10/04/26JANE 225,000.00 025816CM9AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/04/2021 1.650% 11/04/2026
3.95 0.98
2,457.44 12,163.91 433,648.46 99.69 01/26/26MorganSt 435,000.00 38141GWB6GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2017 3.850% 01/26/2027
4.13 0.89
(1,669.76) 1,406.75 122,240.50 97.79 01/09/27Deutsche 125,000.00 459200KM2IBM CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/09/2022 2.200% 02/09/2027
4.00 1.23
2,570.66 16,905.90 272,237.90 99.00 03/02/26GoldmanS 275,000.00 89788MAD4TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/02/2021 1.267% 03/02/2027
4.78 0.34
(1,803.44) 9,246.30 293,976.30 97.99 02/03/27CSFirstB 300,000.00 808513BY0CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/03/2022 2.450% 03/03/2027
4.02 1.29
(1,129.49)(5,000.00) 400,484.00 100.12 04/10/27Deutsche 400,000.00 665859AW4NORTHERN TRUST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2022 4.000% 05/10/2027
3.94 1.39
Account 73340100 Page 23PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 96
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
(217.97)(193.70) 64,771.20 99.65 04/15/27BOFAML 65,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
3.96 1.42
(1,805.67)(3,975.00) 249,120.00 99.65 04/15/27MAXE 250,000.00 91324PEG3UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2022 3.700% 05/15/2027
3.96 1.42
(2,214.54) 647.35 271,412.35 98.70 04/19/27JANE 275,000.00 693475AT2PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/19/2017 3.150% 05/19/2027
4.03 1.45
1,204.49 3,556.40 400,088.40 100.02 JPMorgan 400,000.00 63254ABE7NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
3.90 1.52
(539.36) 15,514.45 180,614.95 95.06 06/03/27JANE 190,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.09 1.70
3,593.08 26,615.00 190,121.00 95.06 06/03/27GoldmanS 200,000.00 89788MAC6TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/03/2020 1.125% 08/03/2027
4.09 1.70
7,230.63 10,204.65 455,403.15 101.20 Citigrou 450,000.00 89236TKJ3TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 09/20/2022 4.550% 09/20/2027
3.89 1.79
3,487.21 17,999.60 393,431.60 98.36 08/03/27MorganSt 400,000.00 882508BC7TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027
3.76 1.84
3,075.77 (7,549.27) 435,623.73 102.50 10/15/27TD Secur 425,000.00 20030NEA5COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/07/2022 5.350% 11/15/2027
4.03 1.81
3,196.39 1,605.00 304,296.00 101.43 11/01/27RBC Capi 300,000.00 023135CP9AMAZON.COM INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/01/2022 4.550% 12/01/2027
3.80 1.89
4,225.60 3,624.40 239,860.50 102.07 04/13/27JANE 235,000.00 61747YFP5MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
4.62 1.38
2,448.07 2,265.77 132,644.07 102.03 04/22/27MAXE 130,000.00 46647PEE2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
4.55 1.41
1,042.64 1,080.03 185,843.23 100.46 04/01/28MUFG 185,000.00 17252MAR1CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2028
4.02 2.31
2,046.09 (92.23) 429,136.52 100.97 04/04/28GoldmanS 425,000.00 427866BH0HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/04/2023 4.250% 05/04/2028
3.85 2.27
229.26 232.44 30,211.44 100.70 04/09/28JPMorgan 30,000.00 231021AY2CUMMINS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/09/2025 4.250% 05/09/2028
3.93 2.28
7,148.66 6,741.45 457,578.45 101.68 04/15/28JPMorgan 450,000.00 30303M8L9META PLATFORMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/03/2023 4.600% 05/15/2028
3.90 2.28
4,163.82 5,854.85 477,401.60 100.51 04/17/28Citigrou 475,000.00 58933YBH7MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/17/2023 4.050% 05/17/2028
3.83 2.31
Account 73340100 Page 24PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 97
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
6,070.18 6,065.56 466,102.36 101.33 HSBC 460,000.00 40428HR95HSBC USA INC
DTD 06/03/2025 4.650% 06/03/2028
4.09 2.37
8,216.44 8,843.10 307,487.10 102.50 GoldmanS 300,000.00 02665WEM9AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 07/07/2023 5.125% 07/07/2028
4.13 2.45
13,875.97 16,118.55 461,051.55 102.46 07/11/28Barclays 450,000.00 05565ECE3BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/11/2023 5.050% 08/11/2028
4.11 2.49
443.74 452.90 140,296.10 100.21 07/25/28MUFG 140,000.00 63743HFZ0NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028
4.06 2.57
29,551.28 30,639.45 602,787.45 104.83 08/29/28GoldmanS 575,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
4.02 2.60
8,288.72 8,115.95 378,633.95 102.33 MIZU 370,000.00 21688ABC5COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 01/09/2024 4.800% 01/09/2029
4.00 2.90
3,552.20 3,552.20 203,552.20 101.78 01/24/28JPMorgan 200,000.00 46647PEU6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.915% 01/24/2029
4.37 2.08
6,778.73 6,808.59 276,714.09 102.49 01/26/29Citigrou 270,000.00 17275RBR2CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
4.02 2.98
1,679.21 1,736.51 96,479.06 101.56 BOFAML 95,000.00 14913UAQ3CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 08/16/2024 4.375% 08/16/2029
3.94 3.44
(739.75)(739.75) 249,260.25 99.70 10/21/28GoldmanS 250,000.00 38141GD27GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
4.48 2.77
16,433.33 16,534.24 475,830.44 103.44 12/17/29BOFAML 460,000.00 00724PAJ8ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/17/2025 4.950% 01/17/2030
4.04 3.70
3,354.80 3,377.22 113,208.92 102.92 01/07/30RBC Capi 110,000.00 63743HFX5NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.950% 02/07/2030
4.19 3.75
6,828.41 7,017.25 255,587.25 102.23 01/07/30UBSS 250,000.00 713448GB8PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
4.03 3.78
6,309.62 6,194.10 307,115.10 102.37 01/24/30TD Secur 300,000.00 427866BL1HERSHEY COMPANY (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/24/2025 4.750% 02/24/2030
4.15 3.81
3,260.36 3,278.45 148,121.85 102.15 02/01/30BOFAML 145,000.00 571676AY1MARS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/12/2025 4.800% 03/01/2030
4.23 3.82
3,930.81 3,930.81 148,930.81 102.71 03/24/30MorganSt 145,000.00 857477DB6STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
4.15 3.96
2,680.30 2,706.66 167,421.21 101.47 03/28/30BOFAML 165,000.00 931142FN8WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
3.97 4.02
Account 73340100 Page 25PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 98
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Corporate Note
4,211.50 6,609.15 419,358.15 93.19 01/30/30JANE 450,000.00 09247XAQ4BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
4.08 4.17
1,765.85 1,775.26 186,677.21 100.91 04/01/30Citigrou 185,000.00 194162AT0COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/02/2025 4.200% 05/01/2030
3.98 4.04
11,136.19 11,161.08 485,866.58 102.29 04/20/30BOFAML 475,000.00 637639AQ8NATIONAL SECS CLEARING (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/20/2025 4.700% 05/20/2030
4.16 3.96
7,218.00 7,218.00 257,218.00 102.89 04/29/30Citigrou 250,000.00 17325FBP2CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2025 4.914% 05/29/2030
4.20 3.96
(156.45)(148.10) 94,510.85 99.49 08/15/30JPMorgan 95,000.00 437076DJ8HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/15/2025 3.950% 09/15/2030
4.06 4.35
291,471.16 4.06 175,036.36 13,824,395.71 13,740,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.30
Certificate of Deposit
4,216.73 4,216.73 594,216.73 100.71 CRAG 590,000.00 22536DWD6CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY
DTD 02/05/2024 4.760% 02/01/2027
4.12 1.19
4,216.73 4.12 4,216.73 594,216.73 590,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.19
Bank Note
4,006.25 4,184.80 403,944.80 100.99 07/07/26BOFAML 400,000.00 94988J6D4WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
4.06 0.66
(985.00)(985.00) 249,015.00 99.61 10/23/28Suntrust 250,000.00 89788JAH2TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
4.50 2.78
3,199.80 4.23 3,021.25 652,959.80 650,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.47
Asset-Backed Security
196.69 201.59 134,201.25 100.14 JPMorgan 134,010.15 43813YAB8HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
4.10 0.20
637.84 645.41 86,499.54 100.73 MIZU 85,871.56 65480MAD5NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
4.37 0.47
656.29 660.64 61,898.54 101.06 JPMorgan 61,248.69 438123AC5HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
4.23 0.73
Account 73340100 Page 26PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 99
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
2,420.38 1,700.45 355,761.00 101.65 WellsFar 350,000.00 50117DAC0KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
4.06 1.32
2,253.36 2,253.50 242,253.36 100.94 MUFG 240,000.00 89237QAD2TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
4.01 1.05
1,222.92 1,226.44 201,211.80 100.61 Barclays 200,000.00 448976AD2HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
3.98 1.34
7,601.95 7,610.55 507,582.50 101.52 BOFAML 500,000.00 05522RDJ4BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
3.93 1.45
3,698.46 4,034.31 501,964.00 100.39 BOFAML 500,000.00 43816DAC9HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
4.01 1.18
4,525.01 4,528.95 349,513.29 101.31 Citigrou 345,000.00 02589BAE0AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
3.88 1.61
972.86 979.14 160,948.32 100.59 MIZU 160,000.00 38014AAD3GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
3.90 1.14
3,329.22 3,331.50 378,318.75 100.89 Barclays 375,000.00 92868MAD1VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
4.02 1.62
2,317.53 2,322.39 297,293.33 100.78 WellsFar 295,000.00 096924AD7BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
4.03 1.34
437.54 439.21 125,425.25 100.34 JPMorgan 125,000.00 437921AD1HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
3.99 1.77
2,350.56 2,358.61 282,317.00 100.83 WellsFar 280,000.00 92970QAE5WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
3.87 1.84
4,378.59 4,384.93 459,340.70 100.95 SGAS 455,000.00 34535KAD0FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
3.92 1.69
395.53 396.35 85,390.49 100.46 BOFAML 85,000.00 05594BAD8BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
3.97 1.53
(0.88)(0.38) 119,989.08 99.99 JPMorgan 120,000.00 90327HAC3USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
3.99 1.93
2,977.67 2,986.48 267,930.11 101.11 SGAS 265,000.00 58773DAD6MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
4.00 1.35
87.59 91.22 499,954.50 99.99 TD Secur 500,000.00 90327HAC3USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
3.99 1.93
(59.46)(59.15) 124,923.00 99.94 Barclays 125,000.00 02008KAC7ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
4.03 1.95
Account 73340100 Page 27PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 100
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt
Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective
Duration
Asset-Backed Security
3,221.75 3,225.04 458,205.48 100.70 BOFAML 455,000.00 92348KDY6VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
4.20 1.84
(231.34)(229.94) 239,744.16 99.89 Barclays 240,000.00 34532BAG6FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
3.99 2.17
(219.72)(217.25) 309,732.16 99.91 Citigrou 310,000.00 44935JAD8HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
3.96 2.12
4,083.68 4,084.47 419,076.96 100.98 RBC Capi 415,000.00 02582JKP4AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
3.90 2.29
639.17 640.52 100,625.80 100.63 TD Secur 100,000.00 362549AD9GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
3.97 1.82
6,205.02 6,207.34 551,198.29 101.14 WellsFar 545,000.00 92970QAJ4WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
3.90 2.36
(676.22)(676.00) 324,286.63 99.78 JPMorgan 325,000.00 89231GAD0TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
3.97 2.23
142.43 142.43 140,112.78 100.08 JPMorgan 140,000.00 14043YAD7COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850%
07/15/2030
3.95 2.33
4,043.31 4,046.03 343,997.04 101.18 Barclays 340,000.00 02582JKV1AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
3.88 2.51
(420.09)(417.38) 359,514.36 99.87 WellsFar 360,000.00 14041NGF2COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/16/2030
3.91 2.66
(600.14)(599.42) 209,392.26 99.71 JPMorgan 210,000.00 16144MAD6CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
4.06 2.20
56,297.98 3.98 56,587.50 8,698,601.73 8,641,130.40 Security Type Sub-Total 1.77
66,721,603.86 66,503,141.86 1,439,204.46 719,558.13 3.84 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.49
Total Investments $66,958,230.37
$455,088.51
$66,503,141.86
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $66,721,603.86 $1,439,204.46 $719,558.13 3.84% 2.49
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340100 Page 28PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 101
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
10/02/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2025 3.875% 07/31/2030
91282CNN7 (635,463.28)(4,179.31)(639,642.59) 630,000.00 10/01/25
10/09/25 USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
90327HAC3 (119,989.46) 0.00 (119,989.46) 120,000.00 10/02/25
10/09/25 USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
90327HAC3 (499,863.28) 0.00 (499,863.28) 500,000.00 10/07/25
10/16/25 ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
02008KAC7 (124,982.15) 0.00 (124,982.15) 125,000.00 10/07/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 (89,819.53)(29.36)(89,848.89) 95,000.00 10/08/25
10/21/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 10/21/2025 4.153% 10/21/2029
38141GD27 (250,000.00) 0.00 (250,000.00) 250,000.00 10/14/25
10/20/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/31/2023 4.125% 08/31/2030
91282CHW4 (127,724.61)(712.19)(128,436.80) 125,000.00 10/15/25
10/23/25 TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
89231GAD0 (324,962.63) 0.00 (324,962.63) 325,000.00 10/15/25
10/29/25 CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
16144MAD6 (209,991.68) 0.00 (209,991.68) 210,000.00 10/17/25
10/23/25 TRUIST BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/23/2025 4.136% 10/23/2029
89788JAH2 (250,000.00) 0.00 (250,000.00) 250,000.00 10/20/25
11/05/25 COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850%
07/15/2030
14043YAD7 (139,970.35) 0.00 (139,970.35) 140,000.00 10/28/25
11/03/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625%
09/30/2030
91282CPA3 (199,234.38)(677.20)(199,911.58) 200,000.00 10/31/25
(5,598.06)(2,977,599.41)(2,972,001.35) 2,970,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
INTEREST
10/25/25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 0.00 1,437.30 1,437.30 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K547 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.421% 05/01/2030
3137HN6B9 0.00 1,436.83 1,436.83 10/01/25
Account 73340100 Page 29PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 102
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/25/25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 0.00 1,818.75 1,818.75 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K539 A2
DTD 04/01/2025 4.410% 01/01/2030
3137HKXJ8 0.00 771.75 771.75 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K537 A2
DTD 03/01/2025 4.430% 02/01/2030
3137HKPF5 0.00 1,329.00 1,329.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 0.00 881.69 881.69 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K527 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.618% 07/01/2029
3137HFF59 0.00 1,635.54 1,635.54 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 0.00 929.32 929.32 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 0.00 1,296.00 1,296.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K067 A2
DTD 09/01/2017 3.194% 07/01/2027
3137FAWS3 0.00 931.58 931.58 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 0.00 2,409.50 2,409.50 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 0.00 2,082.21 2,082.21 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K543 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.329% 06/01/2030
3137HMC65 0.00 2,128.43 2,128.43 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K544 A2
DTD 07/01/2025 4.266% 07/01/2030
3137HMCE8 0.00 1,422.00 1,422.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 0.00 2,363.22 2,363.22 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K528 A2
DTD 09/01/2024 4.508% 07/01/2029
3137HFNZ4 0.00 807.68 807.68 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 0.00 1,104.90 1,104.90 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K520 A2
DTD 04/01/2024 5.180% 03/01/2029
3137HCKV3 0.00 1,295.00 1,295.00 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K545 A2
DTD 08/01/2025 4.290% 07/01/2030
3137HMCK4 0.00 1,823.25 1,823.25 10/01/25
Account 73340100 Page 30PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 103
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 0.00 1,996.36 1,996.36 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 0.00 2,172.50 2,172.50 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 0.00 2,376.03 2,376.03 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 0.00 2,325.00 2,325.00 10/01/25
10/02/25 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
MONEY0002 0.00 145.50 145.50 10/02/25
10/13/25 MORGAN STANLEY (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/19/2024 5.652% 04/13/2028
61747YFP5 0.00 6,641.10 6,641.10 10/13/25
10/15/25 MBART 2025-1 A3
DTD 01/23/2025 4.780% 12/17/2029
58773DAD6 0.00 1,055.58 1,055.58 10/15/25
10/15/25 WFCIT 2024-A2 A
DTD 10/24/2024 4.290% 10/15/2029
92970QAE5 0.00 1,001.00 1,001.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 TAOT 2024-C A3
DTD 07/30/2024 4.880% 03/15/2029
89237QAD2 0.00 976.00 976.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 WFCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/10/2025 4.340% 05/15/2030
92970QAJ4 0.00 1,971.08 1,971.08 10/15/25
10/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 0.00 468.25 468.25 10/15/25
10/15/25 HART 2024-C A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.410% 05/15/2029
448976AD2 0.00 735.00 735.00 10/15/25
10/15/25 BACCT 2024-A1 A
DTD 06/13/2024 4.930% 05/15/2029
05522RDJ4 0.00 2,054.17 2,054.17 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
02582JKV1 0.00 1,218.33 1,218.33 10/15/25
10/15/25 HAROT 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/24/2024 4.330% 05/15/2029
43816DAC9 0.00 1,804.17 1,804.17 10/15/25
10/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 0.00 10.96 10.96 10/15/25
10/15/25 HAROT 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/08/2025 4.150% 10/15/2029
437921AD1 0.00 432.29 432.29 10/15/25
Account 73340100 Page 31PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 104
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/15/25 HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
44935JAD8 0.00 935.51 935.51 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2024-3 A
DTD 07/23/2024 4.650% 07/15/2029
02589BAE0 0.00 1,336.88 1,336.88 10/15/25
10/15/25 FORDO 2025-B A3
DTD 09/26/2025 3.910% 04/15/2030
34532BAG6 0.00 495.27 495.27 10/15/25
10/15/25 AMXCA 2025-2 A
DTD 05/13/2025 4.280% 04/15/2030
02582JKP4 0.00 1,480.17 1,480.17 10/15/25
10/15/25 KCOT 2024-2A A3
DTD 06/25/2024 5.260% 11/15/2028
50117DAC0 0.00 1,534.17 1,534.17 10/15/25
10/15/25 FORDO 2025-A A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.450% 10/15/2029
34535KAD0 0.00 1,687.29 1,687.29 10/15/25
10/16/25 GMCAR 2024-4 A3
DTD 10/16/2024 4.400% 08/16/2029
38014AAD3 0.00 586.67 586.67 10/16/25
10/16/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 0.00 356.67 356.67 10/16/25
10/20/25 BAAT 2025-1A A3
DTD 05/12/2025 4.350% 11/20/2029
05594BAD8 0.00 308.13 308.13 10/20/25
10/20/25 VALET 2025-1 A3
DTD 03/25/2025 4.500% 08/20/2029
92868MAD1 0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25 10/20/25
10/20/25 VZMT 2025-3 A1A
DTD 03/31/2025 4.510% 03/20/2030
92348KDY6 0.00 1,710.04 1,710.04 10/20/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 0.00 310.18 310.18 10/21/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 0.00 679.48 679.48 10/21/25
10/22/25 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
46647PEE2 0.00 3,621.15 3,621.15 10/22/25
10/24/25 STATE STREET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/24/2025 4.834% 04/24/2030
857477DB6 0.00 3,504.65 3,504.65 10/24/25
10/25/25 BMWOT 2025-A A3
DTD 02/12/2025 4.560% 09/25/2029
096924AD7 0.00 1,121.00 1,121.00 10/25/25
10/28/25 WALMART INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/28/2025 4.350% 04/28/2030
931142FN8 0.00 3,588.75 3,588.75 10/28/25
Account 73340100 Page 32PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 105
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
10/30/25 BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
09247XAQ4 0.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 10/30/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2021 1.250% 04/30/2028
91282CBZ3 0.00 4,062.50 4,062.50 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 0.00 6,468.75 6,468.75 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 0.00 3,250.00 3,250.00 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/02/2022 2.875% 04/30/2029
91282CEM9 0.00 17,034.38 17,034.38 10/31/25
10/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
91282CJF9 0.00 17,062.50 17,062.50 10/31/25
133,227.66 133,227.66 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
PAYDOWNS
10/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.190% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 65.20 0.00 65.20 2.43 1.39 65.20 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 773.93 0.00 773.93 0.01 0.00 773.94 10/01/25
10/25/25 FHMS K062 A2
DTD 02/01/2017 3.413% 12/01/2026
3137BUX60 249.94 0.00 249.94 12.50 4.61 249.94 10/01/25
10/15/25 NAROT 2023-B A3
DTD 10/25/2023 5.930% 03/15/2028
65480MAD5 8,884.85 0.00 8,884.85 1.80 1.04 8,884.85 10/15/25
10/15/25 WOART 2024-A A2A
DTD 02/14/2024 5.050% 04/15/2027
98164RAB2 2,603.40 0.00 2,603.40 0.20 0.09 2,603.40 10/15/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2023-4 A3
DTD 11/08/2023 5.670% 06/21/2028
438123AC5 4,397.28 0.00 4,397.28 0.77 0.47 4,397.28 10/21/25
10/21/25 HAROT 2024-3 A2
DTD 08/21/2024 4.890% 02/22/2027
43813YAB8 32,734.05 0.00 32,734.05 2.56 1.39 32,734.05 10/21/25
0.00 8.99 20.27 49,708.65 49,708.65 49,708.66 Transaction Type Sub-Total
SELL
Account 73340100 Page 33PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 106
For the Month Ending October 31, 2025Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIS - 73340100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
SELL
10/02/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 486,523.44 24.04 486,547.48 26,699.22 (4,367.37)FIFO 500,000.00 10/01/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 116,812.50 25.96 116,838.46 6,454.69 (1,043.45)FIFO 120,000.00 10/06/25
10/09/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 467,231.25 103.85 467,335.10 25,800.00 (4,192.56)FIFO 480,000.00 10/07/25
10/09/25 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP
(CALLABLE)
DTD 11/02/2023 5.600% 11/13/2026
63743HFK3 157,701.65 3,520.22 161,221.87 2,755.90 2,722.25 FIFO 155,000.00 10/08/25
10/09/25 JOHNSON & JOHNSON (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2025 4.550% 03/01/2028
478160DH4 91,725.30 432.25 92,157.55 1,777.50 1,767.09 FIFO 90,000.00 10/08/25
10/16/25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/20/2023 5.080% 01/20/2027
06051GLE7 350,693.00 4,247.44 354,940.44 6,219.50 2,663.96 FIFO 350,000.00 10/15/25
10/17/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 4,873.44 25.99 4,899.43 (96.29)(120.21)FIFO 5,000.00 10/16/25
10/17/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 302,153.12 1,611.07 303,764.19 (6,442.19)(7,554.85)FIFO 310,000.00 10/16/25
10/22/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/01/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026
91282CDG3 43,889.06 240.74 44,129.80 (838.48)(1,054.58)FIFO 45,000.00 10/21/25
10/22/25 NATIXIS NY BRANCH
DTD 09/20/2023 5.610% 09/18/2026
63873QP65 405,680.00 2,119.33 407,799.33 5,680.00 5,680.00 FIFO 400,000.00 10/21/25
10/29/25 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/11/2027
24422EWA3 195,136.00 1,020.00 196,156.00 (3,736.00)(4,592.98)FIFO 200,000.00 10/28/25
13,370.89 (10,092.70) 64,273.85 2,635,789.65 2,622,418.76 2,655,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total
(299,873.94) 141,000.49 (158,873.45) 64,294.12 (10,083.71)Managed Account Sub-Total
Total Security Transactions $64,294.12 ($158,873.45)$141,000.49 ($299,873.94)($10,083.71)
Bolded items are forward settling trades.
Account 73340100 Page 34PFM Asset Management, a division of
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
Page 107
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
Tanya Spiegel, Deputy Director of Economic Development
Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Housing Successor Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Annual Report. (HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Housing Successor Agency approve the Annual Report for Fiscal Year
2024-2025, authorize staff to make administrative changes to the Annual Report upon completion
of the California Annual Financial Report, and authorize the transmittal of the Annual Report to
the appropriate State agencies.
BACKGROUND:
After February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, and contracts of the former Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency were transferred, by operation of law to the Housing Successor Agency.
Pursuant to the Dissolution Law, the City Council elected to retain and assume all housing assets
and functions. On October 13, 2013, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 341 (SB341), which
amended provisions of the Dissolution Law, relating to housing successors. SB341 amended the
former housing annual report requirement due to both the State Controller and the Department of
Housing and Community Development while Redevelopment Agencies were active and
established affordable housing requirements to be performed by housing successors effective
January 1, 2014. As of dissolution, housing successors now maintain and deposit funds into a
Low-and-Moderate Income Housing Assets Fund (LMIHAF), subject to the requirements of the
Dissolution Law, as amended by SB 341. Under SB 341, housing successors have an annual
auditing and reporting obligation to be completed every fiscal year starting with FY 2013-2014.
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to SB 341 a Housing Successor Agency is required to file an Annual Report of its
activities within six months of the Agency’s fiscal year end. This report is required to contain the
following information:
1. The amount deposited to the Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF),
distinguishing and amounts deposited for items listed on the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule (ROPS).
2. A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing
any amounts held for items listed on the ROPS.
Page 108
Page 2
3
1
8
7
3. A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited to,
expenditures for (a) monitoring and preserving the long-term affordability of units subject
to affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses; (b) homeless
prevention and rapid re-housing services; and (c) development of affordable housing.
4. The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans
and grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.
5. A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another housing successor in the
previous fiscal year.
6. A description of any project for which the Housing Successor receives or holds property
tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.
7. Status update on compliance with Section 33334.16 for property acquired by the former
redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012, and a status update for interests in
property acquired on or after February 1, 2012.
8. A description of any outstanding obligation pursuant to Section 33413. This section
provides a description of any outstanding replacement housing obligation that remained
to be transfer to the Housing Successor Agency on February 1, 2012, and the Housing
Successor Agency’s plans to meet the unmet obligations.
9. Housing Successor must determine the percentage of housing for seniors and person of
all ages within the previous 10-years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50% of the
total units restricted.
10. The amount of unencumbered funds that exceed the greater of one million dollars
($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount deposited into the account during the Housing
Successor Agency’s preceding four fiscal years, whichever is greater.
The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 is being transmitted to the Housing Successor
Agency in accordance with the applicable legislation and contains all the required information as
outlined above. Following the approval by the Housing Successor, the report will be sent to the
appropriate State agencies for review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund associated with the submission of the Annual
Report. However, failure to submit the report could lead to State sanctions and preventing the
Housing Successor Agency’s funds from being encumbered or expended.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
While approval of the Annual Report is not a specific goal of the City Council, this action is required
by the State of California Housing and Community Development Department to continue
operations of the Housing Successor Agency which meets the Council’s core values of promoting
and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Draft 2024-2025 Housing Successor Agency Annual Report
Page 109
DRAFT
FISCAL YEAR
2024/2025
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT
Day Creek Villas Senior Affordable Housing – Rancho Cucamonga
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 110
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT – 2024/2025
1 | P a g e
1.) The amount deposited to the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund
(LMIHAF), distinguishing any amounts deposited for items listed on the Recognized
Obligation payment Schedule (ROPS).
There was a total of $211,800.00 deposited into the LMIHAF during Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
The deposits primarily consisted of land value held for resale, residual receipt loan
payments of multi-family housing financed by the former Redevelopment Agency, and
loan payments of first-time homebuyer loans.
2.) A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing
any amounts held for items listed on the ROPS.
As of the close of Fiscal Year 2024/2025 the LMIHAF ended with a balance of $1,610,206.
3.) A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited
to, expenditures for (a) monitoring and preserving the long-term affordability of units
subject to affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses; (b)
homeless prevention and rapid re-housing services; and (c) development of affordable
housing.
ACTIVITY EXPENDITURE
Administrative Costs $ 350,000.00
Homeless Prevention $ 28,715.97
Affordable Housing Development N/A
4.) The statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor, the value of loans and
grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.
LOAN NAME/DESCRIPTION/PROPERTY ENDING BALANCE
FAIR VALUE OF LAND
SECURED BY LOAN
NHDC (San Sevaine Villas)$ 45,971,713 N/A
HB Housing Partners (Sunset Heights) $ 13,486,896 N/A
Villa Pacifica II $ 10,614,407 N/A
LINC-Pepperwood $ 29,122,812 N/A
Page 111
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT – 2024/2025
2 | P a g e
Rancho Verde Village East $ 8,025,040 N/A
Heritage Pointe $ 3,609,018 N/A
Olen Jones $ 4,274,400 N/A
Villa Del Norte $ 11,160,323 N/A
Villaggio on Route 66 $ 35,763,951 N/A
First-Time Homebuyer Program $ 2,735,808 N/A
Day Creek Villas LP $ 5,660,567 N/A
Day Creek Villas 2 LP $ 9,610,858 N/A
Total $ 180,035,793
5.) A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another Housing Successor in
the previous fiscal year.
There have been no transfers of LMIHAF funds to any other Housing Successor in the
previous fiscal year.
6.) A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds
property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.
There are no projects which the Housing Successor receives or holds property tax
revenue pursuant to the ROPS.
7.) For interests in real property acquired by the former agency prior to February 1, 2012,
a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interest in real property
acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the
project.
In July 2014 the Housing Successor Agency acquired a 2.5-acre property for the purpose
of constructing a 60-unit senior affordable rental housing complex. The project
affordability agreement provides for 59 of the 60 1-and 2-bedroom units to be restricted
to income eligible seniors. Construction of the project has been completed and a grand
opening was held in May 2018.
Page 112
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT – 2024/2025
3 | P a g e
Additionally, in 2019 the Agency acquired a 4.01-acre property for the construction of a
140-unit senior affordable rental housing complex. As of the date of this report the
project was completed in October of 2020. The project offers 1-and 2-bedroom units to
qualified seniors.
8.) A description of any outstanding obligation pursuant to Section 33413 that remained
to transfer to the housing successor on February 1, 2012, the Housing Successor’s
progress in meeting these obligations, and the Housing Successor’s plans to meet
unmet obligations.
There is no outstanding obligation that had been transferred to the Housing Successor
Agency on February 1, 2012.
9.)Housing Successor must determine the % of housing for seniors and persons of all ages
within the previous 10-years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50% of the total
units restricted.
The Housing Successor is to calculate the percentage of units of deed-restricted rental
housing to seniors assisted by the Housing Successor to the former redevelopment
agency and/or the City within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number
of units of deed restricted rental housing assisted by the Housing Successor to the former
redevelopment agency and/or City within the same time period. If this percentage
exceeds 50%, then the Housing Successor cannot expend future funds in the LMIHAF to
assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Successor or City provides
assistance on a number of restricted rental units that is equal to 50% of the total amount
of deed-restricted rental units.
The following provides the Housing Successor’s Senior Housing Test for the Last 10 Years.
Senior Housing Test 10 Year Test
Number of Assisted Senior Rental Units 199
Number of Total Assisted Rental Units 558
Senior Housing Percentage 36%
Page 113
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT – 2024/2025
4 | P a g e
Previous Affordable Housing Accomplishments Prior to 2011
PROJECT TYPE # OF AFF. UNITS
Las Casitas Family 14
Rancho Verde Family 104
Rancho Verde East Family 40
Monterey Village Family 110
Mountainside Apartments
Pepperwood Apartments
Family
Family
188
228
San Sevaine Villas Family 225
Sycamore Springs Family 96
Sunset Heights Family 116
Villa Del Norte Family 87
Villaggio on Route 66 Family 131
Villa Pacifica Senior 158
Heritage Pointe Senior 48
Olen Jones Senior 96
Total 1,641
10.) The amount of excess surplus, the amount of time the Housing Successor has
had excess surplus, and the Housing Successor’s plan for eliminating the excess
surplus.
At the start of this reporting Fiscal Year the Housing Successor Agency opened with a
computed excess surplus $ 75,025. In accordance with Health and Safety Code
34176.1(d), “excess surplus” shall mean an unencumbered amount that exceeds the
greater of one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) or the aggregate amount deposited into the
account during the housing successor’s preceding four fiscal years, whichever is greater.
The Housing Successor has ended this reporting Fiscal Year with $ 0 in excess surplus.
Page 114
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Gracia, Deputy City Manager, Community Programs
Nathan Hunt, Community Services Deputy Director
Kevin Shimko, Community Services Superintendent
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept and Adopt the Arts & Entertainment
Programming Strategy Policy. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend the City Council consider accepting and adopting the Arts & Entertainment
Programming Strategy Policy as submitted.
BACKGROUND:
Since its opening, the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center has regularly prepared a comprehensive
strategic plan to guide the Lewis Family Playhouse’s programming and operations, audience
development, fund development, and branding and marketing initiatives. Playhouse staff
reviewed these vision plans annually and modified them as appropriate.
Although these plans fostered open dialogue and analysis regarding programming and
operational decisions, they did not intentionally specify the lens through which the team curates
a season, evaluates public performance opportunities, and engages with artists, agents, and
community partners.
On May 7 of 2025, a City Council Special Meeting was conducted, and staff issued a verbal report
regarding the Lewis Family Playhouse programming strategy which included information on
audience development, financial strategy, space utilization, and the programming schedule for
the 2025/2026 season. Discussion ensued on expanding marketing opportunities, partnerships,
and developing standards and guidelines for future programming. Following input received from
the meeting, staff developed the Arts and Entertainment Programming Strategy Policy outlined
herein.
ANALYSIS:
The adoption of the Arts & Entertainment Programming Strategy Policy, which establishes pillars
for programming at Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, will provide the framework for staff to
evaluate arts and entertainment programming and intentionally curate a balanced series of events
that collectively advance the City’s mission, serve the community, and sustain operations.
By design, these pillars — Financial Feasibility, Community-Driven Impact, and Intentional
Curation — will preserve creative autonomy and protect artistic expression while supporting
transparency and alignment with the broader goals of the City, with the understanding that certain
Page 115
Page 2
3
2
0
5
performances may lean more toward one pillar than another.
1. Financial Feasibility
Programming decisions focused on balancing cost recovery, affordable ticket pricing, and
operational sustainability. Key factors include artist fees, production costs, ticket sales
potential, sponsorship support, a balanced approach to risk-taking, guaranteed revenue, long-
term audience development, and equitable budget allocations.
2. Community-Driven Impact
Engaging the audience by valuing feedback and community input through surveys and data
analysis. Programming will prioritize local demographics and interests, partnering with regional
artists, and ensuring inclusivity for all communities. Staff will also explore new marketing
strategies to reach underserved audiences.
3. Intentional Curation
Creating a balanced season by booking reputable artists, evaluating marketing assets and
audience appeal, and leveraging trends and data. Staff will prioritize variety in genres, cultural
offerings, and formats, while anchoring the season with local and regional theatrical
productions, ensuring a sustainable experience for audiences across various spaces.
Furthermore, this policy addresses the use of the three pillars and other criteria when selecting
headliners and high-profile talent, acknowledging First Amendment and artistic freedom, the
professional development/ industry engagement of staff as it relates to the entertainment industry,
as well as the curation and communication about the season to City Council and other members
of leadership.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts related to the adoption of the Arts & Entertainment Programming
Strategy Policy.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This policy supports the City Council’s mission to continuously ensure and advance the quality of
life for the community through inclusive decision-making and Council’s core value of working
together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Arts & Entertainment Programming Strategy Policy
Page 116
ATTACHMENT 1
PURPOSE:
The purpose statement of the Lewis Family Playhouse is, “to enrich the community and enhance
the quality of life through vibrant, entertaining, and enduring experiences that foster connection
and celebrate artistic expression.”
Programming decisions at the venue are guided by a commitment to serve diverse audiences,
uphold professional artistic standards, ensure financial responsibility, and stay true to the venue’s
purpose. This policy provides the philosophical foundation by which the programming team
curates a season, evaluates public performance opportunities, and engages with artists, agents,
and community partners. It is designed to preserve creative autonomy and protect artistic
expression while supporting transparency and alignment with broader goals of the City.
GUIDING PILLARS OF PROGRAMMING:
Programming at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is guided by three strategic pillars:
Financial Feasibility, Community-Driven Impact, and Intentional Curation. These pillars
serve as the lens through which the team evaluates all events, artists, and public performance
opportunities, both individually and within the context of the overall season.
It is important to note that not every event will meet all three pillars equally, and that is by design.
The aim is balance across the season, recognizing that certain performances may lean more
heavily into one pillar than another. For example, a show that carries financial risk may be booked
if its community impact or artistic value justifies that risk. Likewise, a performance with broad
commercial appeal might help support other mission-driven programming.
What matters is that each programming decision is weighed intentionally and that, over the course
of a season, a balanced series of events collectively advances our mission, serves our
community, and sustains our operations.
These pillars do not function as rigid requirements, but as guiding ideals to help maintain focus,
adapt to opportunities, and communicate clearly about the whys behind what is presented.
1. Financial Feasibility
The team strives to be responsible stewards of public funds and earned revenue.
Programming decisions are weighed against the ability to recover costs, maintain
affordable ticket pricing, and sustain operations. Factors to be considered include:
Artist fees and total production costs
Potential for ticket sales and sponsorship support
Balance between risk-taking and guaranteed revenue
ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMMING STRATEGY POLICY
POLICY NO.:
EFFECTIVE:
REVISED:
APPROVED:
Page 117
Page 2 of 3
6
3
8
1
Investment in long-term audience development
Equitable use of funding and budget allocations across the season
2. Community-Driven
The programming VGCC presents is built with the community in mind. The team aims to
reflect, serve, and grow the audience by:
Listening to audience feedback and community input through surveys, outreach, and
data analysis
Prioritizing programming that reflects the demographics and interests of the city/region
Partnering with local and regional artists to elevate homegrown talent and organizations
Offering inclusive and accessible programs for all ages, backgrounds, and communities
Exploring new ways to reach underserved or emerging audiences and how that shifts
marketing strategies
3. Intentional Curation
As performing arts professionals, the team applies industry knowledge and artistic
judgment to create a balanced, thoughtful season. This includes:
Booking reputable, high-quality artists with proven performance experience
Evaluating marketing assets, audience appeal, and touring schedules (routing, block
booking, etc.)
Using national and regional trends, feedback, and data to inform decisions
Prioritizing variety, balancing genres, cultural offerings, audience age ranges, and
event formats
Anchoring our season with three to four theatrical production runs produced by local
and regional partners
Coordinating programming across our indoor and outdoor spaces to ensure
sustainability for staff and audiences
HEADLINERS AND HIGH-PROFILE TALENT:
While high-profile or celebrity artists can generate excitement, such bookings are subject to the
same evaluation criteria above. Often, financial limitations, ticket pricing barriers, or scheduling
realities will make these artists unsuitable for the venue. Nonetheless, each season presents
opportunities to explore these bookings when they align with the pillars.
FIRST AMENDMENT AND ARTISTIC FREEDOM:
As a publicly operated venue, the City must comply with the First Amendment. It is acknowledged
that artistic expression may result in programming that explores diverse perspectives and, at
times, present challenging content. This policy is intended to inform and guide programming
selections of the season in accordance with its stated criteria and does not constitute an
evaluation of the artistic merit of any given production. The Community Services Department
acknowledges that taste and opinion vary widely and remains committed to upholding freedom of
expression within the limitations of this policy.
When programming includes content that is new, experimental, or potentially provocative, internal
leadership will utilize a structured decision-making framework to ensure that arts and
entertainment programming aligns with venue strategy, upholds reputation and safety standards,
incorporates community and stakeholder feedback, evaluates business impact, and considers
regional appeal to support sustainable success as outlined in this policy.
Page 118
Page 3 of 3
6
3
8
1
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRY ENGAGEMENT:
In order to curate a high-quality, relevant season, the programming team must regularly engage
with national and regional arts communities. This includes participation in artist conferences,
showcases, and networking events such as:
Western Arts Alliance (WAA)
Association of Performing Arts Professionals (APAP)
California Presenters (CalPresenters)
Other relevant booking and presenting consortia
These relationships, events, and opportunities are essential to ensuring our programming remains
fresh, strategic, and community-focused.
SEASON PLANNING AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION:
Typically, a new season will be curated and finalized by mid-spring, with the season
announcement occurring in the late spring timeframe. While the timeline and format for public
release may vary season to season based on industry trends and available budget, City Council
will receive a schedule and informational overview of the season at least two weeks before the
public on-sale date.
At this point in the booking process, this notification is intended to inform the Council of the season
schedule, but not to solicit approval. It ensures that council members have the necessary
information to respond to inquiries, purchase tickets, and support marketing efforts as needed.
POLICY REVIEW:
This policy allows the programming team to respond to new opportunities, changing community
interests, and evolving trends. It is not meant to prescribe specific processes, but to clearly state
the ideals that inform decisions. This policy should be reviewed periodically to ensure alignment
with an evolving mission and community needs.
Page 119
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Hunt-Gracia, Deputy City Manager
Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director
Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept $1,000,000 of Community Project Funding from
FY 2024 Congressional Directed Funding Appropriation and Appropriate
$1,000,000 in Grant Revenue and Expenditures to Pilot a Local
Circulator in Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the City Council accept $1,000,000 in Community Project Funding into
F275 and appropriate $1,000,000 in grant revenue and expenditures for costs associated with
the Local Circulator project.
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga identifies high-priority projects to advocate for funding
at both the State and Federal levels. As part of this effort, the City submits Community Project
Funding Requests to specific legislators whose districts align with the location or scope of the
proposed projects. These targeted requests allow the City to pursue critical investments that
support long-term community and City Council goals.
In 2022, the City submitted a $1 million Community Project Funding request to Congressmember
Norma Torres to pilot a local circulator serving key destinations in Rancho Cucamonga. The
proposal focused on expanding transportation, mobility, and connectivity – particularly for
residents in our disadvantaged neighborhoods – by providing direct access to Cucamonga Station
and key retail, dining, and residential destinations throughout the city. Because the project is
located in the southern portion of Rancho Cucamonga and within Congressmember Torres’
district, it was a strategic and well-aligned request for her office’s consideration.
The local circulator pilot is also intended to prepare the region for future growth and major
infrastructure investments, including the anticipated arrival of the Brightline West high-speed rail
project. By testing routes, evaluating demand, and collecting ridership and operational data, the
City will be able to determine long-term mobility needs, inform future transportation planning
efforts that expand mobility options for all residents, and address last-mile barriers.
ANALYSIS:
To implement the local circulator pilot, the City is partnering with Greater Ontario California
(GOCAL), a regional organization representing both Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga that
Page 120
Page 2
3
2
1
1
specializes in community promotion, event coordination, and regional storytelling. Given
GOCAL’s existing operational capacity and local partnerships, they were selected to administer
and operate the pilot program funded through Congressmember Torres’ federal earmark.
Under this partnership, GOCAL will provide comprehensive administrative and operational
support, including contract management, data collection, program evaluation, customer service,
and marketing. They will also supply and operate the shuttle vehicles that make up the one-year
pilot. The service will offer scheduled transportation to key destinations throughout the City with
the goal of improving local mobility, reducing traffic congestion, addressing last-mile barriers, and
supporting sustainable travel choices.
This partnership structure reflects the City’s original intent when seeking federal funding in 2022:
to pilot an adaptable, data-driven mobility solution that could be scaled or modified based on
community needs, future development patterns, and regional transportation investments. The
forthcoming data and evaluation from this pilot will serve as a foundation for determining the
viability of permanent or expanded mobility services in Rancho Cucamonga.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No City funds will be used for the circulator pilot. The full cost of the pilot program, up to
$1,000,000, will be funded through the federal earmark secured by Congressmember Torres. The
City will reimburse GOCAL for eligible administrative and shuttle service costs using these federal
funds for the duration of the one-year pilot.
Type Description Account Amount
Revenue Federal Grants F275 | CC109 | 4501 | RC5100 $1,000,000
Expenditure Capital Outlay – Land F275 | CC109 | 7000 | SC7005 $1,000,000
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The circulator pilot will provide and nurture an excellent quality of life for all, help promote and
enhance a safe and healthy community for all, and intentionally embrace and anticipate our future
in Rancho Cucamonga.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 121
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Hunt-Gracia, Deputy City Manager
Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director
Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept $15,000 of Kaiser Permanente Grant Funds and
Appropriate $15,000 in Revenue and Expenditures to Expand Mental
Health Resources at Day Creek Intermediate. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council accept $15,000 of Kaiser Permanente Grant Funds into F001
and appropriate $15,000 in revenue and expenditures to expand mental health resources at Day
Creek Intermediate School.
BACKGROUND:
Kaiser Permanente’s San Bernardino County Community Health Grant program focuses on a
variety of areas, including access to care, housing and homelessness, income and employment,
education, and mental and behavioral health. Specifically for mental and behavioral health, Kaiser
prioritizes applications that:
Address youth mental health needs
Build community-based capacity
Promote trauma-informed care
Enhance access to quality mental health services in schools, neighborhoods, and
households to mitigate social isolation, trauma, grief, depression, and anxiety
During the 2024 – 2025 program year, the Healthy RC Youth Leader’s Mental Health Group
focused on mental health in middle schools. Through research, school outreach, and focus groups
comprised of their peers, the Youth Leaders – many of whom attended Day Creek Intermediate
School – identified substantial gaps in mental health resources available to middle school
students compared with those offered at the high school level. Their findings showed a clear need
for on-campus supports and accessible mental health education.
Based on these findings, the City submitted a letter of interest in Summer 2025 to apply for a
Kaiser Permanente grant, specifically to address this gap by expanding mental health resources
and access to services at Day Creek Intermediate School. Kaiser invited the City to submit a full
application, and the Youth Leader Group’s research directly informed its development. The City
was notified of the grant award in September 2025.
Page 122
Page 2
3
2
1
2
ANALYSIS:
The City was awarded $15,000 from October 2025 through October 2026 to implement targeted
mental health supports at Day Creek Intermediate School. This effort is being carried out in
partnership with the Etiwanda School District and Day Creek Intermediate School administration,
who have expressed strong support for the project and will collaborate with the City to integrate
the program into existing student wellness efforts. This partnership ensures that program activities
are aligned with school needs, accessible to students, and sustainable throughout the grant
period.
The project will pilot strategies designed to create a supportive environment that normalizes
mental health conversations, connects students to essential resources, and encourages positive
behavioral health practices. Grant Funds may be used towards:
Furnishing an on-campus Wellness Center
Delivering mental health programming and workshops
Partnering with local mental health professionals for on-site support
Training staff and peer leaders to foster a culture of care and resilience
Program Objectives include:
Reduce stigma around mental health by integrating age-appropriate education and peer
engagement opportunities
Improve student awareness of and access to school-based and local mental health
resources
Promote early intervention and emotional well-being through consistent, visible supports
on campus
The project is expected to directly serve 800–1,200 middle school students during the academic
year, with additional benefits for families, educators, and school support staff. By aligning youth-
identified needs with strong school partnerships and external grant funding, this initiative expands
campus-based mental health resources, strengthens school capacity, and supports a culture of
well-being that extends beyond the classroom.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No city funds will be used for this program. The full cost will be funded through the Kaiser grant
and will not exceed $15,000.
Type Description Account Amount
Revenue Local and Other Grants F001 | CC107 | 4501 | RC5102 $15,000
Expenditure General Operations F001 | CC107 | 6200 | SC1404 $15,000
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The Kaiser Grant will provide and nurture an excellent quality of life for all, help promote and
enhance a safe and healthy community for all, and creates equitable opportunity to prosper by
improving youth mental health in Rancho Cucamonga.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 123
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $120,000 from RC
Fiber Fund for the Necessary Design, Engineering, Permitting, Plan
Review, and Project Management for the Distribution of the Fiber Optic
Network as Part of the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve an appropriation in the amount of $120,000 from RC
Fiber Fund 1711304-7004 for the necessary design, engineering, permitting, plan review, and
project management of the fiber optic network.
BACKGROUND:
Entrust Solutions Group (Entrust also dba EN Engineering, Inc.) has worked with municipalities
throughout the United States to deliver large-scale fiber broadband projects. They have expertise
in navigating local regulations, permitting processes, and community engagement which is crucial
for timely project completion. In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Entrust Solutions
Group (previously known as Magellan Advisors, LLC) entered into a Professional Services
Agreement (CO18-103) to provide the necessary design, engineering, permitting, and project
management for the distribution of the fiber optic network as part of the City’s Fiber Optic Master
Plan (Plan), including the operational parameters to connect the new fiber backbone to the City’s
existing infrastructure. The original contract was approved at the regular City Council meeting on
August 15, 2018, and was renewed at the regular City Council meeting on October 2, 2024, for a
one (1) year term with three (3) one (1) year options for renewal.
ANALYSIS:
As the City’s municipal broadband network continues to expand, design services and project
management are necessary for new development in determining new fiber connections and line
extension opportunities for the Plan. The Entrust Solutions, Inc. staff continues to coordinate bi-
weekly project update meetings with City staff, our Internet Service Provider (ISP) Onward, and
our fiber optic construction team, Elecnor Belco. Given Entrust Solution’s knowledge of the project
and master plan (developed in coordination with the City in 2017), along with their qualifications
and expertise in the field, the City opted to exercise the first one-year contract extension to
continue utilizing their services to monitor and provide oversight of the fiber optic design to ensure
the project scope is maintained and achieved.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fund from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) in the amount of $120,000 will be
appropriated to 1711304-7004 – PID 1910-711. Under the agreement, Entrust Solutions, Inc.
Page 124
Page 2
3
2
6
8
receives a monthly payment of $4,500 ($54,000 per year) for project management services,
including bi-weekly meetings with the City and the City’s contractors. The remaining funding is
utilized on an as-needed basis for design services on new extensions, development of bill of
materials, and for updating as-built drawings for inclusion into the City’s GIS system.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Further, the implementation of the Fiber
Optic Master Plan will enhance the City’s mission to embrace and anticipate the future of the
community though an enhanced 21st century infrastructure that is critical for economic
development for existing and new businesses as well as residential customers.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Contract No. 2024-196 with Single Source Justification
Attachment 2 – Contract Amendment No. 1
Page 125
Attachment 1
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 1 of 2
RECOMMENDATION:
To accept a single source procurement for Entrust Solutions, Inc. for design, engineering,
permitting, and project management services for RC Fiber.
BACKGROUND:
Entrust Solutions Group (Entrust) has worked with municipalities throughout the United States to
deliver large-scale fiber broadband projects. They have expertise in navigating local regulations,
permitting processes, and community engagement which is crucial for timely project completion.
In 2017, the City contracted Entrust (previously known as Magellan Advisors, LLC) to develop the
City’s inaugural Fiber Master Plan. This plan outlined a high-level network strategy and design,
prioritized infrastructure deployment strategies based on City corridors and zoning, and created
a model for operationalizing municipal broadband.
In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Entrust Solutions Group entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (CO18-103) to provide the necessary design, engineering, permitting, and
project management for the distribution of the fiber optic network as part of the City’s Fiber Optic
Master Plan (Plan), including the operational parameters to connect the new fiber backbone to
the City’s existing infrastructure. The original contract was approved at the regular City Council
meeting on August 15, 2018 and had four (4) one- (1) year renewal options, ending June 30,
2024.
ANALYSIS:
Entrust has in-depth knowledge of the City’s fiber infrastructure, having designed the entire
system from inception, and worked in collaboration with the City to develop adopted standards
and policies that guide strategies and fiber implementation. Continuity is essential to ensuring
the City can continue to leverage Entrust’s existing knowledge and experiences to ensure
planning and design transitions seamlessly to construction and field operations. Entrust’s
familiarity of the City’s infrastructure, planning and permitting requirements, and community
dynamics will help expedite projects, reduce challenges, and troubleshoot issues expediently.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of services provided by Entrust is for a monthly payment of $4,500 ($54,000 per year)
for project management services, including bi-weekly meetings with the City and the City’s
contractors. The remaining funding is utilized on an as-needed basis for design services on new
DATE: September 23, 2024
TO: Ruth Cain, Purchasing Manager
FROM: Michael Parmer, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Single Source Justification for Entrust Solutions, Inc. for esign, engineering,
permitting, and project management services for RC Fiber.
MEMORANDUM
City Manager’s Office
Page 165
Page 2 of 2
extensions and development of bill of materials as well as updating as-built drawings for inclusion
into the City’s GIS system.
COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Providing superior services to residents enhances the overall quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga
and will support the City Council Core Values to build and preserve the City’s family -oriented
atmosphere and intentionally embrace and anticipate the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Entrust Proposal
Page 166
I:\PURCHASE\TEMPLATES, FORMS\RFQ,RFQual,RFB,RFP TEMPLATES\Sole Source Justification Form.doc
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION
FOR PURCHASES $8,500 AND ABOVE
The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole
source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or
specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source.
Vendor:________________________________________Date: __________________
Commodity/Service:_____________________________________________________
Estimated expenditure: __________________Your Name: ______________________
Extent of market search conducted: ________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Price Reasonableness:__________________________________________________
Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar contract actual
arrangements? _____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
DEFINITIONS:
SINGLE SOURCE – a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from
among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that
meet the specified need.
SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the
goods or services that meet the specified need.
Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most
single/sole source products/services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing
complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry.
This is a Single Source THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE (check one).
1. _______ SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER,
THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be
completed).
2. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS
OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum).
ATTACHMENT 1
Entrust Solutions Group October 10, 2024
Design, engineering, permitting, and project management services for RC Fiber
not-to-exceed $120,000 Michael Parmer
Reviewed alternative consulting companies that fit
the need of
The Agreement will be for an initial three (3) yera term with three (3), one (1) year options for renewal.
unless written notice of non-renewal is given by a Party to the other Party at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the current term.
Page 167
Single/Sole Source Justification Form
Page 2
I:\PURCHASE\TEMPLATES, FORMS\RFQ,RFQual,RFB,RFP TEMPLATES\Sole Source Justification Form.doc
05/23/2024
3. _______ THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE
SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED
FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application).
4. _______ UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS
NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique
features are and what benefit the City will accrue.)
5. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT
STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization
request).
6. _______ NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION
FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED
MEMORANDUM.
The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived, and that the vendor identified as
the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized
as a single/sole source for the service or material.
Department Head: ____________________________ Department: _______________________
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S
DISAPPROVE
Comments:_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
$5,000 - $49,999
APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: ____________________________Date: __________
$50,000 - $150,000
APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER: ____________________________Date: __________
$150,000 AND OVER
See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________Date: __________
X
City Manager' Office
44
Page 168
Attachment 2
Page 169
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager / Fire Chief
Augie Barreda, Deputy Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of the Purchase of Radios from Motorola Solutions, Inc. as
a Single Source Vendor in the Amount of $28,390. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Fire Board authorize the single source purchase of three (3) handheld
radios and miscellaneous related equipment from Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of
$28,390.
BACKGROUND:
The fire service operates in unique and challenging environments. The life safety of firefighters
and citizens depends on reliable, functional communication tools that work in the harshest and
most hostile of environments.
Similar to self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and personal protective equipment (PPE),
handheld radios are essential components of firefighter survival. Firefighters often work with
limited or no visibility and with extreme noise levels due to fire apparatus, saws, hose nozzle
operations, etc. Fire conditions often require firefighters to crawl on their hands and knees or
perform job functions while lying down. Gloves, SCBA, and other PPE restrict vision, hearing and
the manual dexterity required to operate radio controls. Not being able to see or hear makes
fireground communications challenging. During interior firefighting operations, firefighters use
their handheld radios to communicate with each other to assess the status of incident operations
or to request specific firefighting tactics. Firefighters also use their radios to communicate with
company officers to inform them of conditions. Most importantly, firefighters depend on their
radios to call a Mayday. Handheld radios allow firefighters inside to communicate with personnel
on the outside who may have a better vantage point from which to assess conditions – the size
and location of the fire and building conditions. Information from outside can prevent crews from
advancing into dangerous conditions inside.
In September 2003, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) released
the document, Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Research Needs Pertaining to Firefighter
Radio Communication Systems, where on page 13 it states: “It is critical for firefighters to
communicate with one another within a structure and with units operating outside the structure,
regardless of the building construction.” The best way this can be done when crews are separated
or in trouble are through the use of a personal handheld radio.
Page 170
Page 2
2
9
5
0
The Fire District uses Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios, which are the standard within the
County and Region. They are a key component in maintaining interoperability with CONFIRE,
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, all other County first responder agencies, Cal Fire, and
the US Forest Service during Mutual and Automatic Aid.
When the FCC agreed to restructure the 800MHz band- Nextel Sprint- part of the agreement was
to exchange certain public safety radios that qualified. The radios issued as part of this re-banding
are exclusively Motorola. The County of San Bernardino Information Services Department (ISD)
is the administrator of this program. The Fire District has a contract with the County (ISD) for
Monthly radio access and maintenance. County ISD solely maintains and programs Motorola
radios. Motorola radios are the radios used on the 800 MHz trunking system infrastructure within
our County and region.
In October 2023, the Fire District began a multiphase replacement of the Motorola 800 MHz
handheld radios. Phase One consisted of the purchase of 75 Motorola APX 8000 radios. These
radios were distributed to fire personnel who have the potential of entering a structure under
hazardous conditions and needed access to the enhanced safety features of the new radios.
On August 20, 2025, the Fire Board approved Phase Two of the replacement of the Motorola 800
MHz handheld radios in the amount of $191,370. This included the purchase of 18 radios and
miscellaneous equipment to be placed on the Fire District’s wildland apparatus and also build the
Fire District’s cache of radios needed for upstaffing additional fire apparatus during wildfires and
weather-related events.
ANALYSIS:
The Fire District has determined that three (3) additional radios and miscellaneous equipment
need to be purchased during the current fiscal year in order to complete Phase Two of the
replacement of 800 MHz handheld radios. The additional purchase will be $28,390 and result in
a fiscal year total of $219,760.
In order to provide continuity of operations and ensure the health and safety of Fire District
personnel, staff recommends utilizing another single source purchase with Motorola Solutions,
Inc. for the purchase of the additional 800 MHz handheld radios for current FY 2025-26.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The purchase of replacement handheld radios was approved in the FY 2025-26 budget. A total
of $340,000 was allocated in the Fire Protection Capital Fund under account F288 CC501
SC7002 P0089 (Capital Outlay – Equipment and Furnishings) for replacement of both 800 MHz
radios and VHF radios. The purchase price for the additional Motorola 800 MHz handheld radios
will be $28,390 and result in a fiscal year total price of $219,760.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by ensuring our
first responders have the resources and tools necessary to respond effectively during emergency
situations.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 171
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services
Behrang Abadi, Director of Innovation and Technology
Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Lilyan Villarreal, Deputy Director of Innovation & Technology
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
Tanya Trieu-Bui, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Use of National Association of State
Procurement Officials (NASPO) Value Point Cooperative Agreement with
CDWG, LLC in the Amount of $3,984,600 for the Procurement and
Implementation of Network Hardware, Software, and Services, with a
Contingency of $80,000. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend the City Council and Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District approve the use of a cooperative contract through NASPO Value Point AR3227, to
CDWG, LLC for the procurement and implementation of network hardware, software, and
services in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets.
BACKGROUND:
The City’s current networking hardware was originally implemented over 10 years ago. This
critical infrastructure that enables communication between essential systems and services has
reached end of life.
The manufacturer will no longer offer support or provide security updates for the City’s existing
hardware. Once support lapses, the City will no longer be able to receive assistance from the
manufacturer in the event of hardware failure or technical issues. Replacement parts will become
increasingly difficult and expensive to source. Additionally, not having access to patches or
software updates will leave the City open to considerable cybersecurity risk.
ANALYSIS:
The network refresh project will replace outdated networking hardware with modern, supported
technology. This upgrade is essential for maintaining a stable, secure, and reliable network
infrastructure to properly support the City’s current and future operations.
Given the critical nature of this investment, and to safeguard against potential cybersecurity leaks,
the City intends to utilize a cooperative agreement to select a trusted and reputable vendor. Under
the NASPO ValuePoint Data Communications (#AR3227) cooperative agreement, CDWG, LLC
Page 172
Page 2
3
2
5
4
has been deemed an authorized Fulfillment Partner for the state of California. Funding exists in
the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget for an additional $160,000 for anticipated implementation
services. Staff are working to identify qualified vendors. A subsequent staff report will be prepared
for City Council review in 2026 once a successful vendor has been selected.
Staff recommend utilizing the NASPO cooperative agreement to award the contract to CDWG,
LLC for the procurement of network hardware, software, and support services for five years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient appropriation for the network refresh project is funded in the Fiscal Year 2025/26
Adopted Budget. The annual support costs for years 2-5 will be included in future recommended
budgets.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's Core Value of intentionally embracing
and anticipating our future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - NASPO Cooperative Agreement AR3227
Attachment 2 - State of California Participating Addendum AR3227
Attachment 3 - State of California Amendment 2 AR3227
Page 173
STATE OF UTAH COOPERATIVE CONTRACT
Contract #: AR3227
1. CONTRACTING PARTIES: This contract is between the Utah Division of Purchasing and the following Contractor:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Name
170 West Tasman Dr.
Street Address
San Jose CA 95134
City State Zip
Vendor # VC0000118462 Commodity Code #: 920-05 Legal Status of Contractor: For-Profit Corporation
Contact Name:Mimi Nguyen-Farr, Sr Manager Phone Number:(408) 527-2627 Email:mimnguye@cisco.com
2. CONTRACT PORTFOLIO NAME: Data Communications Products and Services.
3. GENERAL PURPOSE OF CONTRACT: Provide Data Communications Products and Services for the Award Categories provided in
Attachment B Scope of Work.
4. PROCUREMENT: This contract is entered into as a result of the procurement process on FY2018, Solicitation# SK18001.
5. CONTRACT PERIOD: Effective Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2019. Termination Date: Monday, September 30, 2024 unless terminated
early or extended in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract. Renewal Options: Two (2) one year renewal options.
6. Administrative Fee (if any): Contractor shall pay to NASPO ValuePoint, or its assignee, a NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee of
one-quarter of one percent (0.25% or 0.0025) of contract sales no later than 60 days following the end of each calendar quarter. The
NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee shall be submitted quarterly and is based on sales of theServices.
7. Prompt Payment Discount Details (if any): N/A.
8. ATTACHMENT A: NASPO ValuePoint Master Terms and Conditions, including the attached Exhibits
ATTACHMENT B: Scope of Services Awarded to Contractor
ATTACHMENT C: Pricing Discounts and Value Added Services
ATTACHMENT D: [Reserved]
Any conflicts between Attachment A and the other Attachments will be resolved in favor of Attachment A.
9. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED INTO THIS CONTRACT BY REFERENCE BUT NOTATTACHED:
a. All other governmental laws, regulations, or actions applicable to the goods and/or services authorized by thiscontract.
b. Utah Procur SK18001.
10. Each signatory below represents that he or she has the requisite authority to enter into thiscontract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties sign and cause this contract to be executed. Notwithstanding verbal or other representations by
CONTRACTOR DIVISION OF PURCHASING
Contractor's signature Date Director, Division of Purchasing Date
Type or Print Name and Title
Internal Contract Tracking #: AR3227 Solicitation #: SK18001 Vendor #: VC0000118462
August 30, 2019
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 174
Attachment A: Page 1 of 37
Note: sections negotiated 1, 2, 5, 6, 7,
8, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22,
24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 37, 38,
40, and 46.
Attachment A: NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions
1. Master Agreement Order of Precedence
a. Any Order placed under this Master Agreement shall consist of the following documents:
(1) ddendum
(2) NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms & Conditions;
(3) , A Statement of Work, including a Service Level Agreement contained within the Statement of
Work;
(4) The Solicitation; and
(5) ed) and accepted by the Lead
State.
b. These documents shall be read to be consistent and complementary. Any conflict among these
documents shall be resolved by giving priority to these documents in the order listed above.
Contractor terms and conditions that apply to this Master Agreement are only those that are
expressly accepted by the Lead State and must be in writing and attached to this Master Agreement
as an Exhibit or Attachment.
2. Definitions
Unless otherwise provided in this Master Agreement, capitalized terms will have the meanings given to
those terms in this section.
Administrative Data
Data may include
Personal Data and information about contractual commitments, whether collected at the time of the initial
registration or thereafter.
Cloud Software means a Contractor-hosted software offering as described in the applicable Cloud
Offeri
set forth in Exhibit 1.
Contractor means the person or entity directly delivering Products or performing services under the terms
and conditions set forth in this Master Agreement or through its approved Fulfillment Partners.
Data Breach means any
teams, non-authorized access to or acquisition of computerized Purchasing Entity Data or Personal Data
that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of the Non-Public Data or Personal Data, or the
ability of Purchasing Entity to access the Purchasing Entity Data or Personal Data.
Disabling Code means computer instructions or programs, subroutines, code, instructions, data or
functions, (including but not limited to viruses, worms, date bombs or time bombs), including but not
limited to other programs, data storage, computer libraries and programs that self-replicate without
Page 175
Attachment A: Page 2 of 37
manual intervention, instructions programmed to activate at a predetermined time or upon a specified
event, and/or programs purporting to do a meaningful function but designed for a different function, that
software, applications and/or its end users processing environment, the system in which it resides, or any
other software or data on such system or any other system with which it is capable of communicating.
Embedded Software means one or more software applications which are installed and reside on a
set forth in Exhibit 1.
Fulfillment Partner means a third-party contractor or reseller qualified and authorized by Contractor, and
approved by the Participating Entity under a Participating Addendum, who may, to the extent authorized
by Contractor, fulfill any of the requirements of this Master Agreement including but not limited to
providing Services under this Master Agreement and billing Purchasing Entity directly for such Services.
Contractor may, upon written notice to the Participating Entity, add or delete authorized Fulfillment
Partners as necessary at any time during the contract term. Fulfillment Partner has no authority to amend
this Master Agreement or to bind Contractor to any additional terms and conditions.
Intellectual Property means any and all patents, copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade secrets,
trade names, patentable inventions, or other similar proprietary rights, in tangible or intangible form, and
all rights, title, and interest therein.
Lead State means the State centrally administering any resulting Master Agreement(s).
Master Agreement means the underlying agreement executed by and between the Lead State, acting on
behalf of the NASPO ValuePoint program, and the Contractor, as now or hereafter amended.
NASPO ValuePoint is the NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Organization LLC, doing business as NASPO
ValuePoint, a 501(c)(3) limited liability company that is a subsidiary organization the National Association
of State Procurement Officials (NASPO), the sole member of NASPO ValuePoint. NASPO ValuePoint
facilitates administration of the NASPO cooperative group contracting consortium of state chief
procurement officials for the benefit of state departments, institutions, agencies, and political subdivisions
and other eligible entities (i.e., colleges, school districts, counties, cities, some nonprofit organizations,
etc.) for all states, the District of Columbia, and territories of the United States. NASPO ValuePoint is
identified in the Master Agreement as the recipient of reports and may perform contract administration
functions relating to collecting and receiving reports as well as other contract administration functions as
assigned by the Lead State.
Order or Purchase Order means any purchase order, sales order, contract or other document used by a
Purchasing Entity to order the Products and/or Services as authorized under the Master Agreement and
Participating Addenda
scheduled during the term of and/or post the expiration date of the Master Agreement, often negotiated
to take advantage of predetermined or to lock-in pricing (i.e. from older Contractor pricelists).
Participating Addendum means a bilateral agreement executed by a Contractor and a Participating
Entity incorporating this Master Agreement and any other additional Participating Entity specific language
or other requirements, e.g. ordering procedures specific to the Participating Entity, other terms and
conditions.
Participating Entity means a state in the United States of America, or other public sector legal entity (i.e.
political subdivisions such as municipalities and counties, and K-12 and higher education institutions) in
the United States of America, properly authorized to enter into a Participating Addendum.
Participating State means a state, the District of Columbia, or one of the territories of the United States
who has the authority to execute a Participating Addendum to this Master Agreement. Upon execution
of the Participating Addendum, a Participating State becomes a Participating Entity; however, a
Participating State listed in the Request for Proposal is not required to participate through execution of a
Participating Addendum.
Personal Data means data alone or in combination that includes information relating to an individual that
identifies the individual by name, identifying number, mark or description can be readily associated with a
Page 176
Attachment A: Page 3 of 37
particular individual and which is not a public record. Personal Information may include the following
personally identifiable information (PII): government-issued identification numbers (e.g., Social Security,
numbers; or Protected Health Information (PHI) relating to a person.
Product means any equipment, software (including embedded software), documentation, service or other
deliverable supplied or created by the Contractor pursuant to this Master Agreement. The term Products,
supplies and services, and products and services are used interchangeably in these terms and
conditions.
Purchasing Entity means a state (as well as the District of Columbia and U.S territories), city, county,
district, other political subdivision of a State, and a nonprofit organization under the laws of some states if
authorized by a Participating Addendum, that issues a Purchase Order against the Master Agreement
and becomes financially committed to the purchase.
Purchasing Entity Data means all information, whether in oral or written (including electronic)
form, created by or in any way originating with a Participating Entity or Purchasing Entity
provided or transferred to Contractor in the course of using the Services or Cloud Software
provided under this Agreement. Purchasing Entity Data includes Administrative Data and does
not include Telemetry Data or Statistical Data.
Services mean services that are in scope of this Master Agreement and are supplied or created by the
Contractor pursuant to this Master Agreement (to include the attached Services Exhibit in Exhibit 2).
Security Incident
security teams, unauthorized access to Purchasing Entity Data and Personal Data that Contractor
possession or control of the Contractor. A Security Incident may or may not turn into a Data Breach.
Service Level Agreement (SLA) means a written agreement between both the Purchasing Entity and the
Contractor that is subject to the terms and conditions in this Master Agreement and relevant Participating
Addendum (unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing between the Purchasing Entity and the
Contractor). A Service Level Agreement may be memorialized within a Statement of Work for the
Services. SLAs should include: (1) the technical service level performance promises, (i.e. metrics for
performance and intervals for measure), (2) description of service quality, (3) identification of roles and
responsibilities, (4) remedies, such as credits, and (5) an explanation of how remedies or credits are
calculated and issued. Not every Service provided under this Master Agreement need be covered by a
SLA.
Solicitation
Proposal.
Statement of Work means a written document agreed between Contractor and Purchasing Entity that
defines Services and deliverables to be provided to Purchasing Entity.
Software means the binary image of Contractor computer programs (including Upgrades) which could
be a downloadable file, delivered on physical media, pre-installed on the on-premise computer
system, resident in ROM/Flash (system memory) or cloud-hosted and purchased from Contractor.
Software is set forth in Exhibit 1.
Statistical Data means any information/data that Contractor derives from Purchasing Entity Data
and/or Telemetry Data, provided that such information/data is aggregated and/or de-identified such
that it cannot reasonably be used to identify an individual or entity.
Telemetry Data means information generated by instrumentation and logging systems created
through the use and operation of Contractor products and services.
Page 177
Attachment A: Page 4 of 37
NASPO ValuePoint Program Provisions
3. Term of the Master Agreement
a. The initial term of this Master Agreement is for five (5) years. This Master Agreement may be
discretion and by mutual agreement and upon review of requirements of Participating Entities,
current market conditions, and Contractor performance.
b. The Master Agreement may be extended for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed six (6)
months, if in the judgment of the Lead State a follow-on, competitive procurement will be
unavoidably delayed (despite good faith efforts) beyond the planned date of execution of the follow-
on master agreement. This subsection shall not be deemed to limit the authority of a Lead State
under its state law otherwise to negotiate contract extensions.
4. Amendments
The terms of this Master Agreement shall not be waived, altered, modified, supplemented or amended in
any manner whatsoever without prior written agreement of the Lead State and Contractor.
5. Participants and Scope
a. Contractor may not deliver Products under this Master Agreement until a Participating Addendum
acceptable to the Participating Entity and Contractor is executed. The NASPO ValuePoint Master
Agreement Terms and Conditions are applicable to any Order by a Participating Entity (and other
Purchasing Entities covered by their Participating Addendum), except to the extent altered, modified,
supplemented or amended by a Participating Addendum. By way of illustration and not limitation,
this authority may apply to unique delivery and invoicing requirements, confidentiality requirements,
defaults on Orders, governing law and venue relating to Orders by a Participating Entity,
indemnification, and insurance requirements. Statutory or constitutional requirements relating to
availability of funds may require specific language in some Participating Addenda in order to comply
with applicable law. The expectation is that these alterations, modifications, supplements, or
amendments will be addressed in the Participating Addendum or, with the consent of the Purchasing
Entity and Contractor, may be included in the ordering document (e.g. purchase order or contract)
used by the Purchasing Entity to place the Order.
b. Use of specific NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreements by state agencies, political subdivisions
and other Participating Entities (includ
use state contracts are subject to the approval of the respective State Chief Procurement Official.
Issues of interpretation and eligibility for participation are solely within the authority of the respective
State Chief Procurement Official.
c. Obligations under this Master Agreement are limited to those Participating Entities who have signed
a Participating Addendum and Purchasing Entities within the scope of each Participating
Addendum States or other entities permitted to participate may use an informal competitive process
to determine which Master Agreements to participate in through execution of a Participating
Addendum. Financial obligations of Participating Entities who are states are limited to the orders
placed by the departments or other state agencies and institutions having available funds.
Participating Entities who are states incur no financial obligations on behalf of other Purchasing
Entities. Contractor shall email a fully executed PDF copy of each Participating Addendum to
PA@naspovaluepoint.org to support documentation of participation and posting in appropriate
databases.
d.NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Organization LLC, doing business as NASPO ValuePoint, is not a
party to the Master Agreement. It is a nonprofit cooperative purchasing organization assisting
states in administering the NASPO cooperative purchasing program for state government
departments, institutions, agencies and political subdivisions (e.g., colleges, school districts,
Page 178
Attachment A: Page 5 of 37
counties, cities, etc.) for all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the territories of the United
States.
e. Participating Addenda shall not be construed to amend the following provisions in this Master
Agreement between the Lead State and Contractor that prescribe NASPO ValuePoint Program
requirements: Term of the Master Agreement; Amendments; Participants and Scope; Administrative
Fee; NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports; NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative
Program Marketing and Performance Review; NASPO ValuePoint eMarketCenter; Right to Publish;
Price and Rate Guarantee Period; and Individual Purchasing Entity. Any such language shall be
void and of no effect.
f. Participating Entities who are not states may under some circumstances sign their own Participating
Addendum, subject to the consent to participation by the Chief Procurement Official of the state
where the Participating Entity is located. Coordinate requests for such participation through NASPO
ValuePoint. Any permission to participate through execution of a Participating Addendum is not a
determination that procurement authority exists in the Participating Entity; they must ensure that they
have the requisite procurement authority to execute a Participating Addendum.
g. Resale
assignment of the right to services. Subject to any specific conditions included in the solicitation or
Addendum, Purchasing Entities may not resell Products (the definition of which includes services).
Absent any such condition or explicit permission, this limitation does not prohibit: payments by
employees of a Purchasing Entity for Products when purchased for the Purchasing Entity; sales of
hardware Products to the general public as surplus property; and fees associated with inventory
transactions with other
laws and regulations. Any sale or transfer permitted by this subsection must be consistent with
license rights granted for use of intellectual property. The transfer of licenses to software shall be
-current software transfer and relicensing policy.
6. Administrative Fees
a. The Contractor shall pay to NASPO ValuePoint, or its assignee, a NASPO ValuePoint Administrative
Fee of one-quarter of one percent (0.25% or 0.0025) no later than sixty (60) days following the end
of each calendar quarter. The NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee shall be submitted quarterly
and is based on all sales of products and services under the Master Agreement (less any charges
for taxes or shipping). The NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee is not negotiable. This fee is to be
included as part of the pricing submitted with proposal.
b. Additionally, some states may require an additional fee be paid directly to the state only on
purchases made by Purchasing Entities within that state. For all such requests, the fee level,
payment method and schedule for such reports and payments will be incorporated into the
Participating Addendum that is made a part of the Master Agreement. The Contractor may adjust the
Master Agreement pricing accordingly for purchases made by Purchasing Entities within the
jurisdiction of the state. All such agreements shall not affect the NASPO ValuePoint Administrative
Fee percentage or the prices paid by the Purchasing Entities outside the jurisdiction of the state
requesting the additional fee. The NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee in subsection 6a shall be
based on the sum of all sales at Net Purchase Price at the adjusted prices (if any) in Participating
Addenda,
service minus all applicable contract discounts, rebates or value added incentives, and excluding
sales, use or other applicable taxes, surcharges or like fees, to the extent applicable to an Order.
7. NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports
In addition to other reports that may be required by this solicitation, the Contractor shall provide the
following NASPO ValuePoint reports.
a. Summary Sales Data. The Contractor shall submit quarterly sales reports directly to NASPO ValuePoint
using the NASPO ValuePoint Quarterly Sales/Administrative Fee Reporting Tool found at
Page 179
Attachment A: Page 6 of 37
http://calculator.naspovaluepoint.org. Any/all sales made under this Master Agreement shall be reported
as cumulative totals by state. Even if Contractor experiences zero sales during a calendar quarter, a
report is still required. Reports shall be due no later than sixty (60) days following the end of the calendar
quarter (as specified in the reporting tool).
b. Detailed Sales Data. Contractor shall also report detailed sales data by: (1) state; (2)
entity/Purchasing Entity type, e.g. local government, higher education, K12, non-profit; (3)
Purchasing Entity name; (4) Purchasing Entity bill-to and ship-to locations; (4) Purchasing Entity and
Contractor Purchase Order identifier/number(s); (5) Purchase Order Type (e.g. sales order, credit,
return, upgrade, determined by industry practices); (6) Purchase Order date; (7) Ship Date; (8) and
line item description, including product number if used. The report shall be submitted in any form
required by the solicitation. Reports are due on a quarterly basis and must be received by the Lead
State and NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative Development Team no later than thirty (30) days after
the end of the reporting period. Reports shall be delivered to the Lead State and to the NASPO
ValuePoint Cooperative Development Team electronically through a designated portal, email, CD-
ROM, flash drive or other method as determined by the Lead State and NASPO ValuePoint.
Detailed sales data reports shall include sales information for all sales under Participating Addenda
executed under this Master Agreement. The format for the detailed sales data report is in
Attachment H of the Solicitation.
c.
government use only. Sales to employees for personal use are prohibited. [RESERVED].
d. Contractor shall provide the NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative Development Coordinator with an
executive summary each quarter that includes, at a minimum, a list of states with an active
Participating Addendum, states that Contractor is in negotiations with and any Participating
Addendum roll out or implementation activities and issues. NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative
Development Coordinator and Contractor will determine the format and content of the executive
summary. The executive summary is due thirty (30) days after the conclusion of each calendar
quarter.
e. Timely submission of these reports is a material requirement of the Master Agreement. The recipient
of the reports shall have exclusive ownership of the media containing the reports. The Lead State
and NASPO ValuePoint shall have a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty free, transferable
right to display, modify, copy, and otherwise use reports, data and information provided under this
section.
8. NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative Program Marketing, Training, and Performance Review
a. Contractor agrees to work cooperatively with NASPO ValuePoint personnel. Contractor agrees to
sales/marketing workforce regarding the Master Agreement contract, including the competitive
nature of NASPO ValuePoint procurements, the Master Agreement and Participating Addendum
process, and the manner in which qualifying entities can participate in the Master Agreement.
b. Contractor agrees, as Participating Addenda become executed, if requested by ValuePoint
personnel to provide plans to launch the program within the participating state. Plans will include
time frames to launch the agreement and confirmation that the Contractor
updated to properly reflect the contract offer as available in the participating state.
c. Contractor agrees, absent anything to the contrary outlined in a Participating Addendum, to consider
Purchasing Entity proposed terms and conditions, as deemed important to the Purchasing Entity,
for possible inclusion into the Purchasing Entity agreement. Contractor will ensure that their sales
force is aware of this contracting option.
d. Contractor agrees to participate in an annual contract performance review at a location selected by
the Lead State and NASPO ValuePoint, which may include a discussion of marketing action plans,
target strategies, marketing materials, as well as Contractor reporting and timeliness of payment of
administration fees.
Page 180
Attachment A: Page 7 of 37
e. Contractor acknowledges that the NASPO ValuePoint logos may not be used by Contractor in sales
and marketing until a logo use agreement is executed with NASPO ValuePoint.
f. The Lead State expects to evaluate the utilization of the Master Agreement at the annual
performance review. Lead State may, in its discretion, terminate the Master Agreement pursuant to
section 35 or not exercise an option to renew, when Contractor utilization does not warrant further
administration of the Master Agreement. The Lead State may exercise its right to not renew the
Master Agreement if vendor fails to record or report revenue for three consecutive quarters, upon
60-calendar day written notice to the Contractor. Termination based on nonuse or under-utilization
will not occur sooner than two years after award (or execution if later) of the Master Agreement. This
subsection does not limit the discretionary right of either the Lead State or Contractor to terminate
the Master Agreement pursuant to Section 35or to terminate for default pursuant to Section 37
9. NASPO ValuePoint eMarket Center
a. In July 2011, NASPO ValuePoint entered into a multi-year agreement with SciQuest, Inc. (doing
business as JAGGAER) whereby JAGGAER will provide certain electronic catalog hosting and
Purchasing Entit to access a
central online website to view and/or shop the goods and services available from existing NASPO
ValuePoint Cooperative Contracts. The central online website is referred to as the NASPO
ValuePoint eMarket Center.
b. The Contractor will have visibility in the eMarket Center through Ordering Instructions. These
Ordering Instructions are available at no cost to the Contractor and provide Purchasing Entity
information regarding the Contractor website and ordering information. The Contractor is
required at a minimum to participate in the eMarket Center through Ordering Instructions.
c. At a minimum, the Contractor agrees to the following timeline: NASPO ValuePoint eMarket Center
Site Admin shall provide a written request to the Contractor to begin Ordering Instruction process.
The Contractor shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written request to work with NASPO
ValuePoint to provide any unique information and ordering instructions that the Contractor would like
the Purchasing Entity to have.
d. If the solicitation requires either a catalog hosted on or integration of a punchout site with eMarket
Center, or either solution is proposed by a Contractor and accepted by the Lead State, the
provisions of the eMarket Center Appendix to these NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms
and Conditions apply.
10. Right to Publish
Throughout the duration of this Master Agreement, Contractor must secure from the Lead State prior
approval for the release of information that pertains to the potential work or activities covered by the
Master Agreement. This limitation does not preclude publication about the award of the Master
Agreement or marketing activities consistent with any proposed and accepted marketing plan; nor does
the limitation preclude Contractor providing limited information as necessary for Contractor to perform its
duties or secure or exercise any rights under the Master Agreement. The Contractor shall not make any
services that are the subject of this Master Agreement without prior written consent. Failure to adhere to
this requirement may result in termination of the Master Agreement for cause.
11. Price and Rate Guarantee Period
All pricing must be guaranteed for the first year of the Master Agreement.
Following the guarantee period, any request for price increases must be for an equal guarantee period (1
year), and must be submitted to the Lead State at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the effective
date. The Lead State will review a documented request for an MSRP price list increase only after the
Price Guarantee Period. Requests for price increases must include sufficient documentation supporting
the request and demonstrating a reasonableness of the adjustment when comparing the current price list
to the proposed price list. Documentation may include: the manufacturers national price increase
Page 181
Attachment A: Page 8 of 37
announcement letter, a complete and detailed description of what products are increasing and by what
percentage, a complete and detailed description of what raw materials and/or other costs have increased
and provide proof of increase, index data and other information to support and justify the increase.
No retroactive price increases will be allowed.
Price Reductions. In the event of a price decrease in any category of product at any time during the
ed commercial price list, including renewal options, the Lead State shall be
notified immediately. All published commercial price list price reductions shall be effective upon the
notification provided to the Lead State.
12. Individual Purchasing Entities
Except to the extent modified by a Participating Addendum, each Purchasing Entity shall follow the terms
and conditions of the Master Agreement and applicable Participating Addendum and will have the same
rights and responsibilities for their purchases as the Lead State has in the Master Agreement, including
but not limited to, any indemnity or right to recover any costs as such right is defined in the Master
Agreement and applicable Participating Addendum for their purchases. Each Purchasing Entity will be
responsible for its own charges, fees, and liabilities. The Contractor will apply the charges and invoice
each Purchasing Entity individually.
Administration of Orders
13. Ordering and Orders
a. Lead State desires that the Master Agreement identifier and purchase order numbers be clearly
shown on all acknowledgments, shipping labels, packing slips, invoices, and on all
correspondence. Any such information will be per Contractor's existing free form structure, without
customization. The purchase order numbers reflect Contractor's Fulfillment Partner purchase order
numbers; however, Contractor will request that its Fulfillment Partners use reasonable efforts to
provide the Purchasing Entity Purchase Order number in the free form notes.
b. Contractor reserves the right to require that purchases be made through Fulfillment Partners.
Where so required by Contractor, Purchasing Entities shall not order Products and/or Services
directly from Contractor and shall order same from Fulfillment Partner. Purchasing Entity shall
purchase Products and/or Services by issuing a written or electronic Purchase Order, signed or (in
the case of electronic transmission) sent by its authorized representative, indicating specific
products, quantity, unit price, total purchase price, shipping instructions, requested delivery dates,
bill-to and ship-to addresses, tax exempt certifications, if applicable, and any other special
instructions.
c. Any contingencies on Purchasing Entity's Purchase Orders are not binding upon Contractor. The
terms and conditions of this Master Agreement and applicable Participating Addendum prevail,
regardless of any additional or conflicting terms on the Purchase Order, or other correspondence
from Purchasing Entity to Contractor and any additional or conflicting terms are deemed rejected by
Contractor unless Contractor has expressly agreed to such terms in writing. Mere
acceptance or processing of a Purchase Order or Order containing such terms shall not
constitute such express consent.
d. All Purchase Orders are subject to Contractor's reasonable acceptance (including performing
any related credit checks). Contractor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to accept or
reject orders in writing within ten (10) days from receipt, or within three (3) business days, if
orders are placed electronically.
e.Purchasing Entity may defer product shipment up to thirty (30) days from the originally
scheduled shipping date, provided written notice is received by Contractor at least ten (10)
days before the originally scheduled shipping date. Cancelled orders, rescheduled
deliveries, or product configuration changes made by Purchasing Entity less than ten (10)
Page 182
Attachment A: Page 9 of 37
days before the original shipping date are subject to Contractor's acceptance and a charge
of fifteen percent (15%) of the total invoice amount relating to the affected Product(s).
Contractor reserves the right to reschedule delivery due to configuration changes made
within ten (10) days of scheduled shipment. No cancellation shall be accepted by
Contractor where products are purchased with implementation services, including but not
limited to design, customization, or installation services, except as may be set forth in the
agreement or Statement of Work under which the services are to be rendered.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if Contractor is delayed in shipping the product
for thirty (30) days or more from the original shipping date, the Purchasing Entity may
cancel the order without charge.
f. Services. Purchasing Entity may place Purchase Orders for the various services offered by
Contractor. The provision of any such services, if accepted by Contractor, shall be subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, including the Services Exhibit attached
hereto as Exhibit 2, as well as the then-current terms of service offerings set forth on
Contractor's website at https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/service-descriptions.html.
Contractor reserves the right to subcontract services to a third party organization to provision
services for Purchasing Entity.
g. All stated prices are exclusive of any taxes, fees, and duties or other similar amounts, however
designated, and including without limitation value added, sales and withholding taxes which are
levied or based upon such prices, charges, or upon this Master Agreement. Purchasing Entity
will pay sales and use taxes, if any, imposed on the Products and Services acquired under this
Master Agreement, or furnish proof of its tax-exempt status upon request. Contractor will pay all
other taxes based on Contractor's income or gross receipts, or personal property taxes levied
or assessed on Contractor's personal property. In the event that the Purchasing Entity is
exempt from property and sales taxes, it will not be charged same.
h. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Master Agreement to the contrary, modifications which
Contractor deems necessary to comply with specifications, changed safety standards
or governmental regulations, to make the product non-infringing with respect to any patent,
copyright, or other proprietary interest, or to otherwise improve the product may be made at any time
by Contractor without prior notice to or consent of Purchasing Entity or NASPO, and such altered
product shall be deemed fully conforming. Contractor shall employ commercially reasonable efforts
to announce, including by electronic posting, product discontinuance or changes other than those
set forth in the previous sentence in accordance with Contractor's End-of-Life Policy, which is found
at the following URL: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/eos-eol-policy.html Purchasing Entity
may make a last-time purchase of such products as set forth in such policy.
i. Purchasing Entities may define entity or project-specific requirements and informally compete the
requirement among companies having a Master Agreement on
procedure may also be used when requirements are aggregated or other firm commitments may be
made to achieve reductions in pricing. This procedure may be modified in Participating Addenda
ules and policies. The Purchasing Entity may in its sole
discretion determine which Master Agreement Contractors and/or Fulfillment Partners should be
solicited for a quote. The Purchasing Entity may select the quote that it considers most
advantageous, cost and other factors considered.
j. Each Purchasing Entity will identify and utilize its own appropriate purchasing procedure and
documentation. Contractor and/or Fulfillment Partner as applicable is expected to become familiar
ules, policies, and procedures regarding the ordering of supplies
and/or services contemplated by this Master Agreement.
k. Contractor shall not begin work without a valid Purchase Order or other appropriate commitment
document under the law of the Purchasing Entity.
l. Orders may be placed consistent with the terms of this Master Agreement during the term of the
Master Agreement.
Page 183
Attachment A: Page 10 of 37
m. All Orders pursuant to this Master Agreement, at a minimum, shall include:
(1) The services or supplies being delivered;
(2) The place and requested time of delivery;
(3) A billing address;
(4) The name, phone number, and address of the Purchasing Entity representative;
(5) The price per hour or other pricing elements consistent with this Master Agreement and the
proposal;
(6) A ceiling amount of the order for services being ordered; and
(7) The Master Agreement identifier.
n. All communications concerning administration of Orders placed shall be furnished solely to the
ch other
individual identified in writing in the Order.
o. Orders must be placed pursuant to this Master Agreement prior to the termination date thereof, but
may have a delivery date or performance period up to 120 days past the then-current termination
date of this Master Agreement Maintenance agreements may have terms as prescribed in Section
27. Contractor is reminded that financial obligations of Purchasing Entities payable after the current
applicable fiscal year are contingent upon agency funds for that purpose being appropriated,
budgeted, and otherwise made available.
p. Notwithstanding the expiration or termination of this Master Agreement, Contractor agrees to
perform in accordance with the terms of any Orders then outstanding at the time of such expiration
or termination. Contractor shall not honor any Orders placed after the expiration or termination of
this Master Agreement, or otherwise inconsistent with its terms. Orders from any separate indefinite
quantity, task orders, or other form of indefinite delivery order arrangement priced against this
Master Agreement may not be placed after or extend after the expiration or termination of this
Master Agreement, notwithstanding the term of any such indefinite delivery order agreement.
14. Shipping and Delivery
a. The prices are the delivered price to any Purchasing Entity. All deliveries for hardware Products
shall be F.O.B. destination, freight pre-paid, with all transportation and handling charges pre-paid by
the Contractor, for the standard shipping time intervals. Expedited shipping and/or a special delivery
request that are non-standard delivery beyond docking areas at warehouses or designated delivery
drop-offs locations at buildings (i.e. delivery of the Order, including pallets, to a closet, designated
rooms, etc.) will result in additional charges to the Purchasing Entity. Title for hardware Products
and risk of loss shall pass to the Purchasing Entity upon delivery. The minimum shipment amount, if
any, will be found in the special terms and conditions. Any order for less than the specified amount
is to be shipped with the freight prepaid and added as a separate item on the invoice.
b. Any damage to a building interior, scratched walls, damage to the freight elevator, etc., negligently
caused by Contractor will be the responsibility of the Contractor. If damage does occur, it is the
responsibility of the Contractor to immediately notify the Purchasing Entity placing the Order.
c.sts shall include all
packing and/or crating charges. Cases shall be of durable construction, good condition, properly
labeled and suitable in every respect for storage and handling of contents.
d.Scheduled shipping dates will be assigned by Contractor as close as practicable to Purchasing
-current lead times for the Products. Contractor will
use commercially reasonable efforts to ship all direct orders designated for shipment to U.S.
locations within thirty (30) days for hardware Products. The following circumstances may affect lead
times: (i) new products purchased within the first three (3) months of release of the product which
are subject to Contractor's then current published lead-times, (ii) third-party stand-alone products
which are not a component of equipment resold by Contractor, (iii) end-of-life products where the
termination of the product has been announced by Contractor, (iv) products which have been line-
Page 184
Attachment A: Page 11 of 37
stopped due to software discrepancies, reconfiguration, industry-wide product shortages, or alleged
infringement claims, or (vi) situations where government rated orders create delays in lead-times.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time when Purchasing Entity states "expedite" on an order
for a hardware Product or otherwise communicates to Contractor that an order is to be expedited,
Contractor shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the earliest possible delivery of
such products.
e. Contractor will communicate scheduled shipping dates in the order acknowledgement or on www.
Cisco.com within three (3) business days after receipt of an electronic order on www.cisco.com,
provided, however, that in the event such notification is not received in this time period,
Purchasing Entity shall notify Contractor of the non-receipt, and Contractor's sole obligation with
respect to such non- receipt shall be to promptly provide the information to the Purchasing Entity
after such notification.
f. If Contractor has reason to believe that the actual shipment date will occur later than the original
shipment date acknowledged by Contractor for reasons caused by Contractor, Contractor shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to promptly provide additional information to Purchasing Entity
including by electronic posting of the expected period of delay and, upon request, of the steps
available, if any, to minimize the delay. If the extended delivery date is anticipated to be more than
thirty (30) calendar days beyond the originally scheduled delivery date, the parties will work in good
faith to resolve any ordering issues.
g. Purchasing Entity shall assume responsibility for compliance with applicable export laws and
regulations, including the preparation and filing of shipping documentation necessary for export
clearance. This also applies in cases where Purchasing Entity requests delivery of hardware
Products to Purchasing Entity ng agent. Purchasing Entity agrees not to use any export
licenses owned by Contractor.
h. Contractor is not liable for damage or penalty for delay in delivery or for failure to give notice of
delay.
i. All sales are final. Except for return remedies set forth in the warranty statements, Contractor only
errors, or damage in transit. No other returns are authorized. The return of hardware Product must
be in acc
subject to any restocking fees.
15. Laws and Regulations
Any and all Products offered and furnished shall comply fully with all applicable Federal and State laws
and regulations.
16. Inspection and Acceptance
Purchasing Entity has thirty (30) days after hardware Product delivery to inspect the hardware Product
for external damage and for any concealed damage ("Acceptance Period"). If external or concealed
damage is revealed during the Acceptance Period, then Purchasing Entity shall notify Contractor. At
Contractor's option, Contractor shall (i) repair such damage, (ii) ship a replacement, or (iii) refund the
purchase price (upon return of the hardware Product). After such Acceptance Period the Products shall
be deemed accepted. Acceptance does not relieve the Contractor of liability or responsibility under
17. Payment
Upon and subject to credit approval by Contractor, payment is due 30 days the date of the invoice.
Invoices for products ordered without implementation services shall be rendered by Contractor on or after
the date of delivery of such products to the Purchasing Entity. Contractor may assess overdue account
charges up to a maximum rate of one percent per month on the outstanding balance, unless a different
late payment amount is specified in a Participating Addendum, Order, or otherwise prescribed by
applicable law. If at any time Purchasing Entity is delinquent in the payment of any invoice, or is otherwise
Page 185
Attachment A: Page 12 of 37
in breach of this Agreement, Cisco may, in its discretion, and without prejudice to its other rights, withhold
shipment (including partial shipments) of any order, require Purchasing Entity to prepay for further
shipments, and/or withhold the provision of Services, until complete payment has been received.
Purchasing Entity grants Cisco a security interest in Products purchased under this Agreement to secure
payment for such Products. If requested by Cisco, Purchasing Entity agrees to execute financing
statements to perfect this security interest. Payments will be remitted by mail. Payments may be made via
r this contract.
18. Warranty
limited warranty as set forth below.
a. Hardware Products. Contractor warrants that from the date of shipment by Contractor to Purchasing
Entity, and continuing for a period of the longer of (a) ninety (90) days or (b) the period set forth in
the warranty card accompanying the product or at https://www.cisco.com/go/warranty, the hardware
Product will be free from defects in material and workmanship, under normal use. This limited
remedy and the entire liability of Contractor and its suppliers under this limited warranty will be, at
Contractor's or its service center's option, (i) shipment of a replacement within the period and
according to the replacement process described in the warranty card (if any) or if no warranty card,
as described at https://www.cisco.com/go/warranty, or (ii) a refund of the purchase price, if the
hardware Product is returned to the party supplying it to Purchasing Entity, if different than
Contractor, freight and insurance prepaid. Contractor replacement parts, used in the replacement of
hardware Products, may be new or equivalent to new. Contractor's obligations hereunder are
conditioned upon the return of affected products, in accordance with Contractor's then- current return
procedures. This limited warranty does not apply if the hardware Product (i) has been altered,
except by Contractor or its authorized representative, (ii) has not been installed, operated, repaired,
or maintained in accordance with instructions supplied by Contractor, (ii) has been subjected to
abnormal physical or electrical stress, abnormal environmental conditions, misuse, negligence, or
accident; or (iv) is licensed or provided for beta, evaluation, testing or demonstration purposes.
b. Embedded Software Products. Contractor warrants that Embedded Software will substantially
conform to the applicable documentation of the Embedded Software for the longer of (i) ninety (90)
days following the date the Embedded Software is made available to Purchasing Entity for use or (ii)
as otherwise set forth at http://www.cisco.com/go/warranty. This warranty does not apply if the
Embedded Software, the hardware Product supplied by Contractor, or any other equipment upon
which the Embedded Software is authorized to be used: (i) has been altered, except by Contractor
or its authorized representative, (ii) has not been installed, operated, repaired, or maintained in
accordance with instructions supplied by Contractor, (iii) has been subjected to abnormal physical or
electrical stress, abnormal environmental conditions, misuse, negligence, or accident; (iv) is
licensed for beta, evaluation, testing or demonstration purposes or other circumstances for which
there is not payment of a purchase price or license fee; or (v) has not been provided by an
authorized reseller of Contractor. Cisco will use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver to
Embedded Software free from any viruses, programs, or programming devices designed to modify,
Contractor shall repair, replace, or cause the refund of the license fees paid for the non-conforming
Embedded Software. This remedy is conditioned on Purchasing Entity reporting the non-
conformance in writing to Contractor within the warranty period. Purchasing Entity may be required
to return the Embedded Software, the Contractor hardware product, and/or Documentation as a
condition of this re
Contractor does not warrant that Embedded Software will operate uninterrupted or error-free or that
all errors will be corrected. In addition, Contractor does not warrant that the Embedded Software or
any equipment, system or network on which the Embedded Software is used will be free of
vulnerability to intrusion or attack.
Page 186
Attachment A: Page 13 of 37
c. Cloud Software Products. Unless otherwise provided for in the applicable Cloud Offer Description,
Contractor warrants that it will provide the Cloud Software in accordance with the Cloud Offer
Description using commercially reasonable skill and care. Upon prompt notification by Purchasing
Contractor for the period in which the Cloud Software did not materially comply with the Cloud
Cloud Software.
d. Services. Contractor warrants that Services sold under this Agreement pursuant to Exhibit 2 will be
performed in a workmanlike manner and, where applicable, will materially comply with the applicable
Service Description. Purchasing Entity must promptly notify Contractor of a breach of this warranty.
ole and exclusive remedy for any breach of this warranty shall be, at
and return of the portion of the fees paid to Contractor by Purchasing Entity for such non-conforming
Services
e. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION 18,
CONTRACTOR HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL REPRESENTATIONS, CONDITIONS AND
WARRANTIES (WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY), INCLUDING, WITHOUT
LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OR CONDITION (A) OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT, TITLE, SATISFACTORY QUALITY, QUIET
ENJOYMENT, ACCURACY, OR SYSTEM INTEGRATION, OR (B) ARISING FROM ANY COURSE
OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR USAGE IN THE INDUSTRY. TO THE EXTENT
AN IMPLIED WARRANTY OR CONDITION CANNOT BE DISCLAIMED, SUCH WARRANTY OR
CONDITION IS LIMITED IN DURATION TO THE APPLICABLE EXPRESS WARRANTY PERIOD.
19. Title of Product
Title to hardware Products and risk of loss shall pass to Purchasing Entity upon delivery. To the extent
the transfer of title to the hardware Product includes a license to use any Embedded Software in the
hardware Product subject to the terms of the End User License Agreement set forth in Exhibit 1. If
Purchasing Entity subsequently transfers title of the hardware Product to another entity, transfer of the
-current software transfer and
relicensing policy.
20. License of Pre-Existing Intellectual Property
Contractor grants to Purchasing Entity a license to Software pursuant to the license terms and restrictions
set forth in Exhibit 1.
21. No Guarantee of Service Volumes
The Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the Lead State and NASPO ValuePoint makes no
representation, warranty or condition as to the nature, timing, quality, quantity or volume of business for
the Services or any other products and services that the Contractor may realize from this Master
Agreement, or the compensation that may be earned by the Contractor by offering the Services. The
Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it has conducted its own due diligence prior to entering into this
Master Agreement as to all the foregoing matters.
22. Purchasing Entity Data
Purchasing Entity retains full right and title to Purchasing Entity Data provided by it. Contractor shall not
collect, access, or use user-specific Purchasing Entity Data except as strictly necessary to provide
Service to the Purchasing Entity. No information regarding Purchasing
can be identified to Purchasing Entity may be disclosed, provided, rented or sold to any third party for
any reason unless required by law or regulation or by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction. The
obligation shall extend beyond the term of this Master Agreement in perpetuity.
Page 187
Attachment A: Page 14 of 37
23. System Failure or Damage
In the event of system failure or damage caused by Contractor or its Services, the Contractor agrees to
use its best efforts to restore or assist in restoring the system to operational capacity.
24. [RESERVED].
25. Data Privacy
The Contractor must comply with all applicable laws related to data privacy and security, including IRS
Pub 1075. Prior to entering into a Statement of Work with a Purchasing Entity for the processing of such
data, at the request of the Purchasing Entity, the Contractor and Purchasing Entity must cooperate and
hold a meeting to determine the data categorization to determine what data the Contractor will hold, store,
or process. To the extent applicable and reasonable, the Contractor must document the data
categorization in the Statement of Work.
26. Transition Assistance
a. The Contractor shall reasonably cooperate with other parties in connection with all Services to be
delivered under this Master Agreement, including without limitation any successor service provider
this Master Agreement. Only as set forth in a Services SOW under this Agreement, the Contractor
usable without the use of the Services and as agreed by a Purchasing Entity. Any transition
services requested by a Purchasing Entity involving additional knowledge transfer and support may
be subject to a separate transition Statement of Work.
b. A Purchasing Entity and the Contractor shall, when reasonable, create a Transition Plan Document
identifying the transition services to be provided and including a Statement of Work if applicable.
c.
the transition services and thereafter as required by the Purchasing Entity.
27. Performance and Payment Time Frames that Exceed Contract Duration
All maintenance or other agreements for services entered into during the duration of an SLA and whose
performance and payment time frames extend beyond the duration of this Master Agreement shall remain
in effect for performance and payment purposes (limited to the time frame and services established per
each written agreement). No new leases, maintenance or other agreements for services may be executed
after the Master Agreement has expired.
General Provisions
28. Insurance
a. Unless otherwise agreed in a Participating Addendum, Contractor shall, during the term of this
Master Agreement, maintain in full force and effect, the insurance described in this section.
Contractor shall acquire such insurance from an insurance carrier or carriers licensed to conduct
-, Class VII or better, in the most
required insurance may result in thi
option, result in termination of its Participating Addendum.
b. Coverage shall be written on an occurrence basis. The limits required shall be as indicated below:
(1) Commercial General Liability covering premises operations, independent contractors, products
and completed operations, blanket contractual liability, personal injury (including death),
advertising liability, and property damage, with a limit of $1 million per occurrence/$3 million
general aggregate provided that such limit can be satisfied with any combination of primary and
umbrella insurance;
Page 188
Attachment A: Page 15 of 37
(2) Contractor must comply with any applicable State Workers Compensation or Employers Liability
Insurance requirements.
c. Contractor shall pay premiums on all insurance policies. Contractor shall provide notice to a
Participating Entity who is a state within five (5) business days after Contractor is first aware of
expiration, cancellation or nonrenewal of such policy or is first aware that cancellation is threatened
or expiration, nonrenewal or expiration otherwise may occur.
d.
Request for Proposal as additional insureds for liabilities falling within Co
obligations under this Agreement that are otherwise covered by such insurance, (2) provides that
written notice of cancellation shall be delivered in accordance with the policy provisions, and (3)
ty insurance policy shall be primary, with any liability insurance
of any Participating State as secondary and noncontributory. Unless otherwise agreed in any
re
the same as those specified in the first sentence of this subsection. If any of the insurance required
herein is cancelled or nonrenewed, Contractor shall replace such insurance so that no lapse in
coverage occurs, and shall provide a revised certificate of insurance evidencing same.
e. Contractor shall furnish to the Lead State copies of certificates of all required insurance within thirty
(30) calendar days of the execution of this Master Agreement and prior to performing any work.
Copies of renewal certificates of all required insurance shall be furnished within thirty (30) days
after any renewal date to the applicable state Participating Entity. Failure to provide evidence of
coverage may, at the sole option of the Lead State, or any Participating Entity, result in this Master
f.
any Participating Addendum, or any Purchase Order.
29. Records Administration and Audit
a. The Contractor shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertaining to this
Master Agreement and Orders placed by Purchasing Entities under it to the extent and in such detail
as shall adequately reflect payments and fees. Contractor shall permit the Lead State, a
Participating Entity, a Purchasing Entity, the federal government (including its grant awarding entities
and the U.S. Comptroller General), and any other duly authorized agent of a governmental agency,
to audit, inspect, examine, copy and/or transcribe Contractor's books, documents, papers and
records directly pertinent to this Master Agreement or orders placed by a Purchasing Entity under it
for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. This right shall survive
for a period of six (6) years following termination of this Agreement or final payment for any order
placed by a Purchasing Entity against this Agreement, whichever is later, or such longer period as is
required
evaluate performance hereunder. Such access will be (i) with at least ten (10) business days
advance written notice, during normal business hours (ii) shall not unduly interrupt or interfere with
Contractor's normal business operations, and (iii) in the event that such audit is conducted by a third
party, such third party shall, prior to conducting such audit, execute a confidentiality agreement for
the benefit of Contractor in a form reasonably satisfactory to Contractor.
b. Without limiting any other remedy available to any governmental entity, the Contractor shall
reimburse the applicable Lead State, Participating Entity, or Purchasing Entity for any overpayments
inconsistent with the terms of the Master Agreement or Orders or underpayment of Administrative
records.
c. The rights and obligations herein exist in addition to any quality assurance obligation in the Master
Agreement requiring the Contractor to self-audit contract obligations and that permits the Lead State
to review compliance with those obligations.
Page 189
Attachment A: Page 16 of 37
30. Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure, and Injunctive Relief
a. Confidentiality. Each party acknowledges that it and its employees or agents may, in the course of
dealing under this Master Agreement, be exposed to or acquire information that is confidential to the
other party. Any and all information of any form that is marked as confidential or would by its nature
, and (3) information concerning individuals, is
reports or other documents or items (including software) that result from the use of the Confidential
Information by Contractor shall be treated in the same manner as the Confidential Information.
Confidential Information does not include information that (1) is or becomes (other than by
disclosure by Receiving Party) publicly known; (2) is furnished by Disclosing Party to others without
possession without the obligation of nondisclosure prior to the time of its disclosure under this
Master Agreement; (4) is obtained from a source other than Disclosing Party without the obligation
of confidentiality, (5) is disclosed with the written consent of Disclosing Party or; (6) is independently
developed by employees, agents or subcontractors of Receiving Party who can be shown to have
had no access to the Confidential Information.
b. Non-Disclosure. Each Party shall hold Confidential Information in confidence, using at least the
industry standard of confidentiality, and shall not copy, reproduce, sell, assign, license, market,
transfer or otherwise dispose of, give, or disclose Confidential Information to third parties (other than
subcontractors as necessary to perform the obligations of this Master Agreement) or use
Confidential Information for any purposes whatsoever other than what is necessary to the
performance of Orders placed under this Master Agreement. Each Party shall advise each of its
employees and agents of their obligations to keep Confidential Information confidential. Each Party
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to assist Disclosing Party in identifying and preventing any
unauthorized use or disclosure of any Confidential Information. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Receiving Party shall advise Disclosing Party immediately if Disclosing Party learns or
has reason to believe that any person who has had access to Confidential Information has violated
or intends to violate the terms of this Master Agreement, and Receiving Party shall at its expense
cooperate with Disclosing Party in seeking injunctive or other equitable relief in the name of
Disclosing Party against any such person. Except as directed by Disclosing Party, Receiving Party
will not at any time during or for three years after the term of this Master Agreement disclose, directly
or indirectly, any Confidential Information to any person, except in accordance with this Master
Receiving Party shall turn over to Disclosing Party all documents, papers, and other matter in their
possession that embody Confidential Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Receiving Party
may keep one copy of such Confidential Information necessary for quality assurance, audits and
evidence of the performance of this Master Agreement.
c. Injunctive Relief. The parties acknowledge that breach of this section, including disclosure of any
Confidential Information, will cause irreparable injury to Disclosing Party that is inadequately
compensable in damages. Accordingly, Disclosing Party may seek and obtain injunctive relief
against the breach or threatened breach of the foregoing undertakings, in addition to any other legal
remedies that may be available. Receiving Party acknowledges and agrees that the covenants
contained herein are necessary for the protection of the legitimate business interests of Disclosing
Party and are reasonable in scope and content.
d. Purchasing Entity Law. These provisions shall be applicable only to extent they are not in conflict
with the applicable public disclosure laws of any Purchasing Entity.
e. The confidentiality obligations under this section shall also extend to (as included within the
definition of Confidential Information) Participating Addenda, as well as Orders or transaction data
relating to Orders under this Master Agreement that identify the entity/Purchasing Entity, Order
dates, line item descriptions and volumes, and prices/rates. This provision does not apply to
Page 190
Attachment A: Page 17 of 37
disclosure to the Lead State, a Participating State, or any governmental entity exercising an audit,
inspection, or examination pursuant to Section 29.
To the extent permitted by law, Receiving Party shall notify the Receiving Party of any entity seeking
access to the Confidential Information described in this Section 30. The Receiving Party will be
authorized to disclose Confidential Information as may be required by applicable law pursuant to a
valid order issued by a court or government agency or relevant regulatory authority (including a
stock exchange), provided that the Receiving Party provides: (i) prior written notice to the Disclosing
Party of such obligation; and (ii) the opportunity to oppose such disclosure.
31. Public Information
This Master Agreement and all related documents are subject to disclosure pursuant to the Purchasing
32. Assignment/Subcontracts
a. Contractor shall not assign, sell, transfer, or sublet rights, or delegate responsibilities under this
Master Agreement, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of the Lead State.
Contractor may, with prior written consent from Participating States, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld, enter into subcontracts with third parties as "Fulfillment Partners."
Fulfillment Partners are Subcontractors who may provide products and services under this Master
Agreement at the price discounts established in this Master Agreement and bill Purchasers directly
for such products and services. In addition, Contractor may, without permission, utilize
subcontractors to perform Services sold under this Master Agreement and provide Cloud Offers.
b. The Lead State reserves the right to assign any rights or duties, including written assignment of
contract administration duties to NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Organization LLC, doing business
as NASPO ValuePoint and other third parties.
33. Changes in Contractor Representation
managing the Master Agreement in writing within 10 calendar days of the change. The Lead State
Contractor agrees to propose replacement key personnel having substantially equal or better education,
proposal.
34. Independent Contractor
The Contractor shall be an independent contractor. Contractor shall have no authorization, express or
implied, to bind the Lead State, Participating States, other Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities to
any agreements, settlements, liability or understanding whatsoever, and agrees not to hold itself out as
agent except as expressly set forth herein or as expressly agreed in any Participating Addendum.
35. Termination
Unless otherwise stated, this Master Agreement may be terminated by either Lead State or Contractor
upon 60 days written notice prior to the effective date of the termination. Further, any Participating Entity
may terminate its participation upon 30 days written notice, unless otherwise limited or stated in the
Participating Addendum. Termination may be in whole or in part. Any termination under this provision
shall not affect the rights and obligations attending orders outstanding at the time of termination,
including any right of a Purchasing Entity to indemnification by the Contractor, rights of payment for
Products delivered and accepted, rights attending any warranty or default in performance in association
with any Order, and requirements for records administration and audit. Termination of the Master
Agreement due to Contractor default may be immediate.
Page 191
Attachment A: Page 18 of 37
36. Force Majeure
Neither party to this Master Agreement shall be held responsible for delay or default caused by fire, riot,
The Lead State may terminate this Master Agreement after determining such delay or default will
reasonably prevent successful performance of the Master Agreement.
37. Defaults and Remedies
a. The occurrence of any of the following events by Contractor shall be an event of default under this
Master Agreement:
(1) Nonperformance of contractual requirements; or
(2) A material breach of any term or condition of this Master Agreement; or
(3) Any certification, representation or warranty by Contractor in response to the solicitation or in this
Master Agreement that proves to be untrue or materially misleading; or
(4) Institution of proceedings under any bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar law, by or
against Contractor, or the appointment of a receiver or similar officer for Contractor or any of its
property, which is not vacated or fully stayed within thirty (30) calendar days after the institution or
occurrence thereof; or
(5) Any default specified in another section of this Master Agreement.
b. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Lead State shall issue a written notice of default,
identifying the nature of the default, and providing a period of sixty (60) calendar days in which
Contractor shall have an opportunity to cure the default. The Lead State shall not be required to
provide advance written notice or a cure period and may immediately terminate this Master
Agreement in whole or in part if the Lead State, in its sole discretion, determines that it is reasonably
necessary to preserve public safety or prevent immediate public crisis. Time allowed for cure shall
damages.
c. If Contractor is afforded an opportunity to cure and fails to cure the default within the period specified
in the written notice of default, Contractor shall be in breach of its obligations under this Master
Agreement and the Lead State shall have the right to exercise any or all of the following remedies:
(1) Exercise any remedy provided by law; and
(2) Terminate this Master Agreement and any related Contracts or portions thereof; and
(4) Suspend Contractor from being able to respond to future bid solicitations; and
(5) Suspend Co and
(6) Withhold payment until the default is remedied.
d. Unless otherwise specified in the Participating Addendum, in the event of a default under a
Participating Addendum, a Participating Entity shall provide a written notice of default as described
in this section and shall have all of the rights and remedies under this paragraph regarding its
participation in the Master Agreement with respect to its Participating Addendum, in addition to those
set forth in its Participating Addendum. Unless otherwise specified in a Purchase Order, a
Purchasing Entity shall provide written notice of default as described in this section and have all of
the rights and remedies under this paragraph and any applicable Participating Addendum with
respect to an Order placed by the Purchasing Entity.
38. Waiver of Breach
Failure of the either party to declare a default or enforce any rights and remedies shall not operate as a
waiver under this Master Agreement or Participating Addendum. Any waiver must be in writing. Waiver
by a party any default, right or remedy under this Master Agreement or Participating Addendum, or with
respect to any Purchase Order, or breach of any terms or requirements of this Master Agreement, a
Participating Addendum, or Purchase Order shall not be construed or operate as a waiver of any
Page 192
Attachment A: Page 19 of 37
subsequent default or breach of such term or requirement, or of any other term or requirement under this
Master Agreement, Participating Addendum, or Purchase Order.
39. Debarment
The Contractor certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for
debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction (contract) by
any governmental department or agency. This certification represents a recurring certification made at
the time any Order is placed under this Master Agreement. If the Contractor cannot certify this statement,
attach a written explanation for review by the Lead State.
40. Indemnification; Limitation of Liability
a. General Indemnity - Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party, along
with their officers and employees, from and against third-party claims, damages or causes of action
dily injury, or damage to
tangible personal property (not including lost or damaged data) arising from negligent or willful
misconduct act(s), error(s), or omission(s) of the indemnifying party, its employees or subcontractors
or volunteers, relating to its performance under the Master Agreement. In the event that the
indemnified party's or a third party's negligent or willful misconduct acts, errors or omissions
contributed to cause the injury or damage for which a claim of indemnity is being asserted against
the Contractor, the damages and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees)
shall be allocated or reallocated, as the case may be, between the indemnified party, the Contractor,
and any other party bearing responsibility in such proportion as appropriately reflects the relative
fault of such parties, or their subcontractors, or the officers, directors, employees, agents,
successors, and assigns of any of them, and the liability of the Contractor shall be proportionately
reduced.
The foregoing indemnification obligations are conditioned upon the indemnified party promptly
notifying the indemnifying party in writing of the claim, suit, or proceeding for which the indemnifying
party is obligated under this Subsection, cooperating with, assisting, and providing information to,
the indemnifying party as reasonably required, and granting the indemnifying party the exclusive
right to defend or settle such claim, suit, or proceeding; provided that any such settlement or
compromise includes a release of the indemnified party from all liability arising out of such claim,
suit or proceeding.
b. Indemnification Intellectual Property. The Contractor shall defend any claim against NASPO,
NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Organization LLC (doing business as NASPO ValuePoint), the
Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities, along with their officers and employees
under this Agreement, infringes patents, copyrights or trademarks ("Intellectual Property Claim") of
another person or entity.
(1)
Property Claim is based on:
(a) compliance with any designs, specifications, requirements, or instructions by any Indemnified
or
(b) or
(c) t, or services offered by
Indemnified Party to external or internal Purchasing Entity, or revenue earned by the
Indemnified Party; or
(d)
software or business processes.
(2) The Indemnified Party shall notify the Contractor promptly after receiving notice of an Intellectual
Property Claim. If Indemnified Party fails to notify Contractor promptly of the Intellectual Property
Claim, and that failure prejudices Cont
Page 193
Attachment A: Page 20 of 37
with respect to that Intellectual Property Claim will be reduced to the extent Contractor has been
prejudiced. In addition, such failure to provide prompt notification shall relieve Contractor of any
Contractor defends any Intellectual Property Claim, it shall have control over the defense and
settlement of the Intellectual Property Claim. However, the Indemnified Party must consent in
writing for any money damages or obligations for which it may be responsible. The Indemnified
Party shall furnish, at the Co
for such defense.
(3) If an Intellectual Property Claim is made or appears likely, Indemnified Party shall permit
Contractor to procure for Indemnified Party the right to continue using Contra
Contractor determines that none of those alternatives is reasonably available, then Indemnified
Party will return and/or cease using Cont
to generally accepted accounting principles.
(4) This Section 40
remedy regarding any Intellectual Property Claims.
c. under Section 40(a) (General
Indemnity) and Section 40(b) (Indemnification Intellectual Property) notwithstanding
anything else herein, all liability of Contractor and its suppliers to any Participating Entity (and any
Purchasing Entity under the Participating Entity) for claims arising under this Agreement, the
applicable Participating Addendum, or otherwise shall be limited to the greater of (i) three million
dollars ($3,000,000.00) or (ii) the money paid to Contractor by the Participating Entity under this
Master Agreement in the twelve (12) month period prior to the event or circumstances that first gave
rise to such liability. This limitation of liability is cumulative and not per incident.
d. Waiver of Consequential Damages. In no event shall Contractor or its suppliers be liable for any (i)
special, exemplary, incidental, indirect or consequential damages, or loss of or damage to data
business, anticipated savings, use of any product or service, opportunity, goodwill or reputation, or
(iii) wasted expenditure (other than any expenditure necessarily incurred to discharge the innocent
41. No Waiver of Sovereign Immunity
In no event shall this Master Agreement, any Participating Addendum or any contract or any Purchase
Order issued thereunder, or any act of the Lead State, a Participating Entity, or a Purchasing Entity be a
waiver of any form of defense or immunity, whether sovereign immunity, governmental immunity,
immunity based on the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or otherwise, from
any claim or from the jurisdiction of any court.
This section applies to a claim brought against the Participating Entities who are states only to the extent
ereign immunity and is not consent by the state to
be sued in federal court. This section is also not a waiver by the state of any form of immunity, including
but not limited to sovereign immunity and immunity based on the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution
of the United States.
42. Governing Law and Venue
a. The procurement, evaluation, and award of the Master Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the Lead State sponsoring and administering the
procurement. The construction and effect of the Master Agreement after award shall be governed by
the law of the state serving as Lead State. The construction and effect of any Participating
Addendum or Order against the Master Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accorda
Page 194
Attachment A: Page 21 of 37
b. Unless otherwise specified in the RFP, the venue for any protest, claim, dispute or action relating to
the procurement, evaluation, and award is in the Lead State. Venue for any claim, dispute or action
concerning the terms of the Master Agreement shall be in the state serving as Lead State. Venue for
any claim, dispute, or action concerning any Order placed against the Master Agreement or the
effect of a Participating State.
c. If a claim is brought in a federal forum, then it must be brought and adjudicated solely and
exclusively within the United States District Court for (in decreasing order of priority): the Lead State
for claims relating to the procurement, evaluation, award, or contract performance or administration
if the Lead State is a party; a Participating State if a named party; the state where the Participating
Entity or Purchasing Entity is located if either is a named party.
43. Assignment of Antitrust Rights
Contractor irrevocably assigns to a Participating Entity who is a state any claim for relief or cause of
action which the Contractor now has or which may accrue to the Contractor in the future by reason of any
violation of state or federal antitrust laws (15 U.S.C. § 1-
provisions), as now in effect and as may be amended from time to time, in connection with any goods or
services provided in that state for the purpose of carrying out the Contractor's obligations under this
Master Agreement or Participating Addendum, including, at the Participating Entity's option, the right to
control any such litigation on such claim for relief or cause of action.
44. Contract Provisions for Orders Utilizing Federal Funds
Pursuant to Appendix II to 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Contract Provisions for Non-
Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards, Orders funded with federal funds may have additional
contractual requirements or certifications that must be satisfied at the time the Order is placed or upon
delivery. These federal requirements may be proposed by Participating Entities in Participating Addenda
and Purchasing Entities for incorporation in Orders placed under this Master Agreement.
45. Leasing or Alternative Financing Methods
The procurement and other applicable laws of some Purchasing Entities may permit the use of leasing or
alternative financing methods for the acquisition of Products under this Master Agreement. Where the
terms and conditions are not otherwise prescribed in an applicable Participating Addendum, the terms
and conditions for leasing or alternative financing methods are subject to negotiation between the
Contractor and Purchasing Entity.
46. Entire Agreement:
This Master Agreement, along with any attachment, contains the entire understanding of the parties
hereto with respect to the Master Agreement unless a term is modified in a Participating Addendum with a
Participating Entity. No click-through, or other end user terms and conditions or agreements required by
Participating Entities or Purchasing Entities, even if use of such Services requires an affirmative
in this Master Agreement.
Page 195
Attachment A, eMarket Center Appendix: Page 22 of 37
eMarket Center Appendix
a. This Appendix applies whenever a catalog hosted by or integration of a punchout site with eMarket
Center is required by the solicitation or either solution is proposed by a Contractor and accepted by
the Lead State.
b.
Contractor for loading a hosted catalog or integrating a punchout site.
c. At a minimum, the Contractor agrees to the following:
(1) Implementation Timeline: NASPO ValuePoint eMarket Center Site Admin shall provide a written
request to the Contractor to begin enablement process. The Contractor shall have fifteen (15)
days from receipt of written request to work with NASPO ValuePoint and JAGGAER to set up an
the Contractor. The schedule will include future calls and milestone dates related to test and go
live dates. The contractor shall have a total of Ninety (90) days to deliver either a (1) hosted
catalog or (2) punch-out catalog, from date of receipt of written request.
(2) NASPO ValuePoint and JAGGAER will work with the Contractor, to decide which of the catalog
structures (either hosted or punch-out as further described below) shall be provided by the
Contractor. Whether hosted or punch-out, the catalog must be strictly limited to the
ucts and/or services not authorized
through the resulting cooperative contract should not be viewable by NASPO ValuePoint
Participating Entity users).
(a) Hosted Catalog. By providing a hosted catalog, the Contractor is providing a list of its
awarded products/services and pricing in an electronic data file in a format acceptable to
JAGGAER, such as Tab Delimited Text files. In this scenario, the Contractor must submit
updated electronic data no more than once per 30 days to the eMarket Center for the Lead
Stat -to-date version of its product/service offering under
the cooperative contract in the eMarket Center.
(b) Punch-Out Catalog. By providing a punch-out catalog, the Contractor is providing its own
online catalog, which must be capable of being integrated with the eMarket Center as a.
Standard punch-in via Commerce eXtensible Markup Language (cXML). In this scenario, the
Contractor shall validate that its online catalog is up-to-date by providing a written update no
more than once per 30 days to the Lead State stating they have audited the offered
products/services and pricing listed on its online catalog. The site must also return detailed
UNSPSC codes (as outlined in line 3) for each line item. Contractor also agrees to provide e-
Quote functionality to facilitate volume discounts.
d. Revising Pricing and Product Offerings: Any revisions to product/service offerings (new products,
altered SKUs, new pricing etc.) must be pre-approved by the Lead State and shall be subject to any
other applicable restrictions with respect to the frequency or amount of such revisions. However, no
cooperative contract enabled in the eMarket Center may include price changes on a more frequent
basis than once per year (see required Price Guarantee Period section 11). The following conditions
apply with respect to hosted catalogs:
(1) Updated pricing files are required each calendar month of the month and shall go into effect in the
eMarket Center on as approved by the Lead State contract administrator.
(2) Lead State-approved price changes are not effective until implemented within the eMarket
changes in eMarket Center.
e. Supplier Network Requirements: Contractor shall join the JAGGAER Supplier Network (SQSN) and
JAGGAER system, and view reports on catalog spend and product/pricing freshness. The Contractor
can receive orders through electronic delivery (cXML) or through low-tech options such as fax. More
Page 196
Attachment A, eMarket Center Appendix: Page 23 of 37
information about the SQSN can be found at: www.sciquest.com or call the JAGGAER Supplier
Network Services team at 800-233-1121.
f. Minimum Requirements: Whether the Contractor is providing a hosted catalog or a punch-out
catalog, the Contractor agrees to meet the following requirements:
(1) Catalog must contain the most current pricing, including all applicable administrative fees and/or
discounts, as well as the most up-to-date product/service offering the Contractor is authorized to
provide in accordance with the cooperative contract; and
(2) The accuracy of the catalog must be maintained by Contractor throughout the duration of the
cooperative contract; and
(3) The Catalog must include a Lead State contract identification number; and
(4) The Catalog must include detailed product line item descriptions; and
(5) The Catalog must include pictures when possible; and
(6) The Catalog must include any additional NASPO ValuePoint and Participating Addendum
requirements. Although suppliers in the SQSN normally submit one (1) catalog, it is possible to
have multiple contracts applicable to different NASPO ValuePoint Participating Entities. For
example, a supplier may have different pricing for state government agencies and Board of
Regents institutions. Suppliers have the ability and responsibility to submit separate contract
pricing for the same catalog if applicable. The system will deliver the appropriate contract pricing
to the user viewing the catalog.
g. Order Acceptance Requirements: Contractor must be able to accept Purchase Orders via fax or
cXML. The Contractor shall provide positive confirmation via phone or email within 24 hours of the
day before a weekend or holiday, the Contractor must provide positive confirmation via phone or
email on the next business day.
h. UNSPSC Requirements: Contractor shall support use of the United Nations Standard Product and
Services Code (UNSPSC). UNSPSC versions that must be adhered to are driven by JAGGAER for
the suppliers and are upgraded every year. NASPO ValuePoint reserves the right to migrate to future
versions of the UNSPSC and the Contractor shall be required to support the migration effort. All line
items, goods or services provided under the resulting statewide contract must be associated to a
UNSPSC code. All line items must be identified at the most detailed UNSPSC level indicated by
segment, family, class and commodity.
i. Applicability: Contractor agrees that NASPO ValuePoint controls which contracts appear in the
from the eMarket Center.
j. The Lead State reserves the right to approve the pricing on the eMarket Center. This catalog review
right is solely for the benefit of the Lead State and Participating Entities, and the review and approval
shall not waive the requirement that products and services be offered at prices (and approved fees)
required by the Master Agreement.
k. Several NASPO ValuePoint Participating Entities currently maintain separate JAGGAER
eMarketplaces, these Participating Entities do enable certain NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative
Contracts. In the event one of these entities elects to use this NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative
Contract (available through the eMarket Center) but publish to their own eMarketplace, the Contractor
agrees to work in good faith with the entity and NASPO ValuePoint to implement the catalog.
NASPO ValuePoint does not anticipate that this will require substantial additional efforts by the
Contractor; however, the supplier agrees to take commercially reasonable efforts to enable such
separate JAGGAER catalogs.
Page 197
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 24 of 37
Exhibit 1 Additional Contractor Terms and Conditions
END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
You and Cisco. Please read it carefully. The Agreement includes the applicable Cloud Offer
Description(s) located at https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/cloud-and-software/cloud-terms.html
and SEULA(s) located at https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/cloud-and-software/software-
and the order of precedence in the event of conflict is in Section 1
. Depending on whether the Software is delivered on-premise as Embedded Software or as
a Cisco-hosted cloud offering of Cloud Software, certain terms herein may not apply to Your purchase.
must have the authority to enter into this Agreement. If You do not have such authority, or
if You do not agree with the terms of this Agreement, do not click accept and do not Use
the Software. If You determine that You cannot comply with the terms of this Agreement
after You have paid for the Software, You may return the Software to the Approved Source,
disable or uninstall the Embedded Software and/or cease Your Use of the cloud-hosted
Cloud Software and receive a full refund, provided You do so within thirty (30) days of
Your initial purchase.
Section 1. License
a. License. Subject to Your payment of the applicable fees to an Approved Source and compliance
with this Agreement, Cisco grants You a limited, non-exclusive license to Use the Software and
related Documentation for Your internal business purposes only and in accordance with any
Supplemental Terms, Order and/or Entitlement. In the event that Cisco requires You to register as an
end user, Your license is valid only if the registration is complete and accurate. The Embedded
Software delivered for Use on-premise may contain open source software, and is subject to separate
license terms. A list of such open source software and related license agreements can be found at
www.cisco.com/go/opensource.
b. Limitations and Restrictions. Unless expressly authorized by Cisco in writing, You will not and will
not allow a third party to:
i. Sell, resell, transfer, sublicense, or assign Your rights under this Agreement to any other person
or entity (except as expressly provided in Section 1.f below);
ii. modify, adapt or create derivative works of the Software or Documentation;
iii. reverse engineer, decompile, decrypt, disassemble or otherwise attempt to derive the source
code for the Software, except as authorized by Cisco ;
iv. make the functionality of the Software available to third parties in a managed or network
provisioned service;
v. Use Software that is licensed for a specific device, whether physical or virtual, on another
device;
vi. remove, modify, or conceal any product identification, copyright, proprietary, intellectual
property notices or other marks on or within the Software;
vii. Use the Software on secondhand and/or refurbished Cisco equipment; or
viii. Use the Software on third party hardware unless otherwise set forth in the Documentation (or
otherwise authorized by Cisco in writing).
c. Your Use of Cloud-Hosted Software. You will be responsible for the accuracy, quality and legality of
Your Customer Data, the means by which You acquired Your Customer Purchasing Entity Data and
Your Use of Your Customer Entity Data with our Software. You will not (i) interfere with other customer
access to, or use of, the Software, or with the security of the Software; (ii) facilitate the attack or
Page 198
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 25 of 37
disruption of the Software, including a denial of service (DoS) attack, unauthorized access, monitoring
or crawling or distribution of malware (including but not limited to viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time
bombs, spyware, adware or cancelbots), or (iii) cause an unusual spike or increase in Your use of the
Software that Cisco determines fraudulently or negatively impacts the operating capability of the
Software. If Your use of the Software requires or permits You to use any Cisco Content, You (and
Your agents) may only use such Cisco Content with the Software and with third-party products or
services offerings that Cisco has identified as compatible. You will not extract Cisco Content from or
use it separate from the Software, nor will you provide Cisco Content to a third party
d. Third Party Use of Software. You may allow a third party to Use the Software licensed to You solely
(i) on Your behalf, (ii) for Your internal operations, and (iii) in compliance with this Agreement. You
agree that You are responsible for any breach of this Agreement by that third party.
e. Upgrades and Additional Copies. Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, You may not
Use Upgrades and additional copies of the Software unless You:
i. hold a valid license to the Software, are in compliance with such license, and have paid the
applicable fee for the Upgrade; and
ii. purchase the Upgrade separately or have a valid support agreement covering the Software,
either as part of a subscription or purchased separately; and
iii. Use additional copies solely for backup purposes limited to archiving for restoration purposes.
f. Transferability/Assignment. You may only transfer or assign Your license rights to on-premise
Embedded Software to another person or entity in accordance with the current Cisco
Relicensing/Transfer Policy. Any transfer or assignment other than in accordance with the Transfer
Policy will have no effect. Cisco may transfer or assign any of its rights or delegate any of its
obligations under this Agreement in its sole discretion.
g. Interoperability. If required by applicable law, Cisco will provide You with the interface information
needed to achieve interoperability between the on-premise Embedded Software and another
independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request
strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes the information available.
h. Non-production and Trial Use.
i. We may provide beta versions of the Software for you to evaluate and provide feedback. Beta
versions are not generally released and may only be used for limited, temporary purposes
-
without warranty of any kind, and Cisco is not responsible for any problems or issues related to
Your use. You understand that the Beta Software may never be generally available and we may
discontinue it in our sole discretion at any time for any reason and delete any Customer Data or
other data without liability to You. Your Use of the Beta Software is valid for thirty (30) days from
the date it is made available to You. You will be invoiced for the list price if You do not return or
stop Using it. You may not publish any results of benchmark tests run on the Beta Software without
first obtaining written approval from Cisco.
ii. We may also give You trial access to generally-available Software. Any trial period will expire in
-
without support or any express or implied warranty or indemnity of any kind. At any time during or
at the end of the trial, Cisco may terminate the trial and deactivate or delete Your account and any
related data, information, and files, and bar any further access to such data, information and files
for any reason.
Section 2. Fees and Payment
Fees for the Software are set out in Your purchase terms with Your Approved Source. Fees are non-
refundable and payment obligations are non-cancelable, except as provided here, in Your purchase
terms, or where prohibited by law.
Page 199
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 26 of 37
Section 3. Ownership and Your Data
a. What We Own. Cisco and its licensors retain ownership of all intellectual property rights in and to the
Software and its underlying technology and associat
including all improvements, enhancements, modifications, and derivative works. Cisco reserves all
rights to the Materials that are not expressly granted under this Agreement or the Supplemental
Terms.
b. What You Own and What You Do with It. You retain all right, title and interest in and to Customer
Data. You authorize Cisco to use any feedback or ideas You provide in connection with Your Use of
the Software for any purpose. You represent that all account information You provide is accurate
and will be kept up-to-date and that You will use reasonable means to protect Your account from any
unauthorized use or access, and promptly notify Cisco of any such use or access.
c. How We Use Your Data. Cisco will process Customer Data and Personal Data in accordance with
Privacy Statement, and the applicable Supplemental Terms. Cisco will
maintain administrative, physical and technical safeguards consistent with industry standards and the
Documentation, which are designed to provide security, confidentiality and integrity of the Customer
Data we process. Certain Data that Cisco collects from the Software, or that You provide or make
accessible to Cisco as part of Your use of the Software, is necessary for the essential use and
functionality of such Software. Data is also used by Cisco to provide associated services such as
technical support and to continually improve the operation, security and functionality of the Software.
For those reasons, You may not be able to opt out from some of the Data collection other than by
uninstalling, disabling or ceasing use of the Software.
i. Use of Telemetry Data and Statistical Data. Cisco may process Telemetry Data related to Your
use of the Software in order to (i) deliver, enhance, improve, customize, support, and/or analyze
the Software and other Cisco offerings, and (ii) derive Statistical Data. Cisco may freely use
Telemetry Data that does not identify You or any of Your Authorized Users. Statistical Data is
owned by Cisco and may be used for any legitimate interest or purpose, including, without
limitation, for purposes of enhancing, developing, marketing, and/or promoting Cisco products and
services, including the Software.
ii. International Data Transfers. Cisco may process and store Customer Data and Personal Data in
the United States or outside of the country where it was collected. You are responsible for providing
any required notices to Authorized Users and obtaining all required consents from Authorized Users
regarding the processing and transfer of their Personal Data by the Software, including international
transfers. Cisco will only transfer Personal Data consistent with applicable law. If Cisco processes
Personal Data from the EEA or Switzerland on Your behalf, we will do so in a manner consistent
with the relevant EU- or Swiss-
www.commerce.gov/privacyshield) or successor frameworks. If Cisco transfers Personal Data from
an APEC Member Economy on Your behalf, Cisco will process such Personal Data in a manner
www.cbprs.org
If Cisco is unable to provide at least the same level of protection as required by the Principles or
CBPRs, Cisco will promptly notify You and cease processing.
Section 4. Software Support
We will provide basic technical support for subscription Cloud and Embedded Software, as described in
the Supplemental Terms. Higher levels of support for subscription Software, and support for perpetual
Software is separately available for purchase.
Section 5. Term and Termination
a. Your right to Use the Software begins on the date (i) the on-premise Embedded Software is made
available for download or installation, or (ii) You receive notice that the cloud hosted Cloud Software
is provisioned or available for Your use , and continues until the end of the term specified in the
Page 200
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 27 of 37
If the Software is licensed for use both on-premise and cloud-hosted, Your right to Use begins on the
earlier of the date the Software is made available for download or is ready for provisioning.
b. Software subscriptions will automatically renew for the renewal period selected on the Order
in writing at least thirty (30) days before the end of the then-current term of its intention not to
renew or (ii) You or Your Approved Source elect on the Order at the time of initial purchase
not to auto-renew the Software subscriptions. Your Approved Source will notify You
reasonably in advance of any Renewal Term if there are fee changes. The new fees will apply
for the upcoming Renewal Term unless You or Your Approved Source promptly notify us in
writing, before the applicable renewal date, that You do not accept the fee changes. In such
event, the Software subscription will terminate at the end of the Initial Term.
c. If a party materially breaches this Agreement and does not cure that breach within thirty (30) days
after receipt of written notice of the breach, the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement for
cause. Cisco also has the right to immediately suspend or terminate Your use of the Software if You
breach Section 1.c or Section 1.a or 1.b above. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement,
You must cease any further use of the Software and destroy any copies within Your control. Upon
any termination by You for
Approved Source any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the Term after the effective date of
termination. Upon any termination by Cisco for Your material breach of the Agreement, You will pay
Cisco or Your Approved Source any unpaid fees covering the remainder of the Term.
d.
posting at http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/index.html. If You or Your Approved Source prepaid
a license fee for Your Use of EOL Cloud Software, Cisco will use commercially reasonable efforts to
transition You to a substantially similar Cloud Software. If Cisco does not have a substantially similar
Cloud Service, then Cisco will credit You any unused portion of the prepaid fee for such Cloud
Service, calculated from the last date the Cloud Service is available. Such credit can be applied
towards the future purchase of Cisco products.
Section 6. General Provisions
a. Audit. During the license term for the Software and for a period of three (3) years after its
expiration or termination, you will take reasonable steps to maintain complete and accurate
records of Your use of the Software sufficient to verify compliance with this Agreement. No more
than once per twelve (12) month period, You will allow Cisco and its auditors the right to examine
such records and any applicable books, systems (including Cisco product(s) or other equipment),
and accounts, upon reasonable advanced notice, during Your normal business hours. If the audit
discloses underpayment of license fees, You or Your Approved Source will pay such license fees
plus the reasonable cost of the audit within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice.
b. Survival. Sections 1.b, 3, 5, 6.a, 6.b, 6.d, 6.g shall survive termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
c. Subcontracting. We may also subcontract any performance associated with the Software to third
parties. Any such subcontract will not relieve Cisco of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
US Government End Users. The Software and Documentation are "commercial items," as defined at
Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") (48 C.F.R.) 2.101, consisting of "commercial computer
software" and "commercial computer software documentation" as such terms are used in FAR 12.212.
Consistent with FAR 12.211 (Technical Data) and FAR 12.212 (Computer Software) and Defense
Federal Acquisiti -1 through 227.7202-4, and
notwithstanding any other FAR or other contractual clause to the contrary in any agreement into which
this Agreement may be incorporated, Government end users will acquire the Software and
Documentation with only those rights set forth in this Agreement. Any license provisions that are
inconsistent with federal procurement regulations are not enforceable against the U.S. Government.
d. Modifications. As our business evolves, we may change this Agreement or any of its components
(except an Order). Changes to the Agreement will only apply to future Orders.
Page 201
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 28 of 37
e. Compliance with Law. You will comply with all applicable laws and regulations related to Your
receipt and use of the Software. You must ensure You have the right to use all features of the
Software in Your jurisdiction. Cisco will comply with all applicable laws in the provision of the Software
to You. We may restrict the availability of the Software in any particular location or modify or
discontinue features to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Cisco may also share
requests found at http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/trust-transparency-
center/validation/report.html.
f. Integration. If any portion of this Agreement is not enforceable, it will not affect any other terms.
Except as expressly stated in a signed agreement, this Agreement, together with any Supplemental
Terms is the complete agreement between the parties with respect to the Software and supersedes
all prior or contemporaneous communications, understandings or agreements (whether written or
oral) regarding this subject matter. In the event of any conflict, the order of precedence is: i)
Supplemental Terms; ii) this Agreement; then iii) any applicable policies referenced in this
Agreement. The parties agree that the English version of the Agreement will govern in the event of a
conflict between it and any version translated into another language.
Definitions
means data related to Your employees or representatives to administer or
manage Your use of the Software. Administrative Data may include Personal Data and information about
our contractual commitments, whether collected at the time of the initial registration or thereafter.
means Cisco or a Cisco authorized reseller, distributor or systems integrator,
including a Fulfillment Partner under the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions.
Authorized User ls authorized by You to access the Software.
means Cisco Systems, Inc. or its applicable affiliate, the Contractor under
the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions.
means any Cisco-provided content or data including, but not limited to, geographic and
domain information, rules, signatures, threat intelligence or other threat data feeds, suspicious URLs and
IP address data feeds.
Cloud Software -hosted software offering as described in the applicable Cloud Offering
Description purchased by You.
Confidential Information -public confidential or proprietary information of the disclosing
party that is clearly marked confidential or should be reasonably assumed as confidential given the nature
of the information and the circumstances of disclosure.
Customer means Purchasing Entity Data in the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms
and Conditions.
means Telemetry Data and Statistical Data.
Documentation isco user or technical manuals, training materials, specifications, privacy
data sheets, or other information applicable to the Software.
Entitlement
product ID (PID
accidents, severe weather events, acts of God, actions of any government agency, epidemic, pandemic,
acts of terrorism, or the stability or availability of the Internet or a portion thereof.
means the additional terms and conditions applicable to the specific cloud-
hosted Software licensed under this Agreement (located here).
Order
duration, type/product ID (PID) and quantity of Software to be provided and the associated fees.
Page 202
Attachment A, Exhibit 1: Page 29 of 37
has the same meaning in the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and
Conditions.
means the Supplemental End User License Agreement containing additional terms and
conditions for the on-premise Software licensed under this Agreement (located here).
Software
downloadable file, delivered on physical media, pre-installed on the on-premise computer system,
resident in ROM/Flash (system memory) or cloud-hosted purchased from an Approved Source. Software
may be either Embedded Software or Cloud Software.
means any information/data that Cisco derives from Customer Data and/or Telemetry
Data, provided that such information/data is aggregated and/or de-identified such that it cannot
reasonably be used to identify an individual or entity.
means information generated by instrumentation and logging systems created through
the use and operation of Cisco products and services.
Upgrades
modifications to the Software.
Use Using e Software
You Your
ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions and applicable Participating Addendum.
Page 203
Attachment A, Exhibit 2: Page 30 of 37
Exhibit 2 -Additional Contractor Terms and Conditions
Services Exhibit
This Services Exhibit governs all Orders for Services placed under the NASPO Master Agreement
Terms and Conditions ("NASPO Master Agreement"). This Services Exhibit consists of the terms set
forth in Exhibit 2 (including its attachments) and the Service Description Purchasing Entity may elect
to purchase.
1. DEFINITIONS
Terms not defined in the body of the NASPO Master Agreement are those set out in the Glossary of
Terms at the end of this Exhibit 2.
2. SCOPE
This Exhibit describes the terms and conditions for (a) Direct Purchases from Cisco by Customer of
Services, and (b) delivery by Cisco of the Services according to the options ordered by Customer or
otherwise provided by Cisco to Customer. Cisco will provide Services for Products and Customer will
be entitled to receive Services for which (i) the applicable Services fees have been paid, (ii) a valid
Software license has been granted and (iii) Customer provides information requested by Cisco such
as valid serial numbers, site location, contract number, and Product type.
3. PRICING
For direct purchases from Cisco, and subsequent Equipment List renewals, prices for Services shall
be those specified in Cisco's then-current Price List less any applicable contract discount in effect
under the NASPO Master Agreement at the time of acceptance of the Purchase Order by Cisco, or
(b) those set forth in a written price quotation submitted by Cisco or its Fulfilment Partner, if at or
below the stated contract discount. All stated prices are exclusive of taxes, fees, and duties or other
amounts in accordance with the NASPO Master Agreement. Any taxes related to Services purchased
pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid by Customer or Customer shall present an exemption
certificate acceptable to the taxing authorities. Applicable taxes shall be billed as a separate item on
the invoice, to the extent possible. In the event that Customer is unable to provide valid and
applicable serial number(s) for Product and Cisco agrees to provide Services, then Service fees
payable by Customer shall be at Cisco's then-current time and materials or non-contract service
rates. Subject to the price discount floor established by Cisco under the NASPO Master Agreement,
for indirect purchases, Fulfillment Partners are free to determine their resale prices unilaterally.
Customer understands that no employee or representative of Cisco or anyone else has any authority
to determine such resale prices, or to limit the Fulfillment Partners' pricing discretion with respect to
Services
In the event that Customer is unable to provide valid and applicable serial number(s) for Product and
-
current time and materials or non contract service rates.
4. INVOICING
Fees for Services, other than those for which a SOW is required, shall be invoiced in advance of
delivery of Services. The timing of invoices for Services provided pursuant to a SOW shall be set
forth in the respective SOW.
5. TERM AND TERMINATION
a. The term of an Equipment List shall commence on the date set forth on such Equipment List,
which may be up to sixty (60) days following the date of Purchase Order acceptance. The term
of an Equipment List shall be for a period of one year and shall be renewed automatically for
Page 204
Attachment A, Exhibit 2: Page 31 of 37
successive one year terms, unless either party notifies the other of its intent to terminate at least
sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the then current one year term.
b. The term of each SOW shall be stated in the SOW.
c. Any Equipment List or SOW may be terminated if Services fees are not paid when due and
payment has not been received within thirty (30) days after notice from Cisco of such past due
payment, or otherwise in accordance with the termination provisions set out in the Agreement.
d. Cisco reserves the right to make changes to the scope and content of the Services or part thereof,
including terminating the availability of a given Service, at any time upon thirty (30) days' prior
notice. Such changes will become effective upon renewal of the affected Equipment Lists and
SOWs. If Customer does not agree to a change of scope or content, Customer may terminate any
affected Equipment List or SOW by notifying Cisco at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration
of the then current one year term of the Equipment List or SOW. In such case, Cisco shall continue
to provide Services until the next expiration date of the affected Equipment List or SOW.
e.Upon termination of any Equipment List, or SOWs, Customer shall pay Cisco for all work
performed under the affected Equipment Lists or SOWs up to the effective date of termination at
the agreed-upon prices, fees, and expense reimbursement rates.
f. Firm Orders for Services under this Services Exhibit placed and accepted prior to expiration of
the contract term, (even if involving a multi-year commitment) remain valid in accordance with the
contract terms which shall remain binding as to such prior orders only for the term stated therein,
and shall not otherwise constitute an extension of the NASPO Master Agreement and this
Services Exhibit for any other Services.
6. [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
7. LICENSES
a.
Service Description or SOW, and the End User License Agreement (EULA) set forth in Exhibit 1,
Cisco grants to Customer a worldwide, non-exclusive and non-transferable license to use for
in object code form; (ii) other Deliverables specified in an applicable AS Service Description or
Licensed
Materials In addition, Cisco grants to Customer a right to modify and create derivative works of
any Scripts provided by Cisco to Customer pursuant to this Services Exhibit, solely for
internal business use. These license grants do not include the right to sublicense; provided that
Customer may permit its suppliers, subcontractors and other related third parties to use the
ensures that any such use is subject to license restrictions and confidentiality obligations at least
as p Agreement.
b. Nothing in this Agreement, any AS Service Description or any SOW shall alter or affect the
Intellectual Property rights and/or licenses provided with any Cisco Products.
c. Customer hereby grants to Cisco a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty free, worldwide right and license
to all Intellectual Property in the Customer Feedback (as defined below) to use and incorporate
Customer Feedback into any Services, Products, Deliverables, Data Collection Tools, Reports,
Scripts or Cisco Pre-Existing Technology, and to use, make, have made, offer to sell, sell, copy,
distribute and create derivative works of such Customer Feedback for any and all purposes
whatsoever, and Customer acknowledges and agrees that it will obtain no rights in or to any
Services, Products, Deliverables, Data Collection Tools, Reports, Scripts or Cisco Pre-Existing
Agreemen Customer Feedback
improvements or changes to any Services, Products, Deliverables, Data Collection Tools, Reports,
Scripts or Cisco Pre-Existing Technology that Customer provides to Cisco.
Page 205
Attachment A, Exhibit 2: Page 32 of 37
8. OWNERSHIP
a. Each party will retain the exclusive ownership of all its pre-existing Intellectual Property,
Confidential Information and materials, including, without limitation, proprietary ideas, sketches,
diagrams, text, know-how, concepts, proofs of concepts, artwork, software, algorithms, methods,
processes, identifier codes or other technology that are owned by a party prior to commencement
of any Services hereunder, or that are otherwise developed by or for such party outside the scope
Pre-Existing Technology
b. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in applicable SOW, Cisco owns and will continue to own
all right, title and interest in and to the Services, Products, Deliverables, Data Collection Tools,
Reports, Scripts, sketches, diagrams, text, know-how, concepts, proofs of concepts, artwork,
software, algorithms, methods, processes, identifier codes or other technology provided or
developed by Cisco (or a third party acting on behalf) pursuant to this Agreement, including
modifications, enhancements, improvements or derivative works of any of the foregoing,
regardless of who first conceives or reduces to practice, and all Intellectual Property in any of the
Cisco Intellectual Property
c. As between Customer and Cisco, Customer shall at all times retain all right, title and interest in
and to all of Pre-Existing Technology and all Intellectual Property that is developed by
Intellectual
Property. Third Party Products shall at all times be owned by the applicable third party, and will
be subject to any applicable third party license terms.
9. SUBCONTRACTING
Cisco reserves the right to subcontract Services to a third-party organization to provide Services to
Customer. Any such subcontract shall not relieve Cisco of any of its obligations under this Services
Exhibit or the NASPO Master Agreement.
Page 206
Attachment A, Exhibit 2, Attachment 1: Page 33 of 37
EXHIBIT 2 -- ATTACHMENT 1
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Additional Services means installation of new Hardware, system additions, Hardware upgrades,
dispatch of a field engineer, or non-mandatory engineering changes.
Advance Replacement means shipment of replacement Field-Replaceable Unit (FRU) before receiving
failed or defective FRU.
Advanced Services means the Services set forth in the AS Service Description(s) found at
http://www.cisco.com/go/servicedescriptions and/or SOW(s) selected by the Customer. Advanced
Services does no
Application Services, nor does it apply to the purchase, support or maintenance of any Products.
Advanced Services Engineer means the Cisco engineer appointed to be the main point of contact for a
Customer purchasing Advanced Services.
Application Software means non-resident or standalone Software Products listed on the Price List that
include but are not limited to Cisco Systems® Network management Software, security Software, IP
telephony Software, Internet appliance Software, Cisco® Intelligent Contact Management Software, IP
Contact Center Software, and Cisco Customer Interaction Suite Software.
AS Service Descriptions mean the description of the Advanced Services available from Cisco, which
are available at http://www.cisco.com/go/servicedescriptions and which are incorporated in this
Agreement by reference.
Authorized Channel means a system integrator, distributor or reseller authorized by Cisco to sell
Services.
Business Days means the generally accepted days of operation per week within the relevant region
where the Services shall be performed, excluding local holidays as observed by Cisco.
Cisco means Contractor under the NASPO Master Agreement.
Customer means Purchasing Entity under the NASPO Master Agreement.
Data Collection Tools means Hardware and/or Software tools that support Cisco's ability to provide
troubleshooting on cases, data analysis, and report generation capabilities as part of the Advanced
Services.
Depot Time or Local Time means Central European Time for Services provided in Europe-Middle-East
d Time
for Services provided in Japan, and Pacific Standard Time for Services provided in all other locations.
Deliverable(s) means, with respect to each AS Service Description and/or SOW, the items to be
delivered by Cisco to Customer as set forth in an applicable AS Service Description and/or SOW,
including, without limitation, any Software, Reports, Data Collection Tools, and/or Scripts.
Device Type means a Cisco supported Hardware Product (for example, Cisco Catalyst® 6509 Switch,
GSR 12000 and Cisco 7200 Series Router).
Direct Purchases means purchases of Services by Customer directly from Cisco.
Equipment List means the list of Hardware and/or Software for which Cisco provides services.
Event means notification by Customer of its performance of a planned Network Hardware, Software, or
configuration change.
Feature Set Upgrade means a separately licensed and priced Software release that contains an
enhanced configuration or feature set.
Page 207
Attachment A, Exhibit 2, Attachment 1: Page 34 of 37
Field-Replaceable Unit (FRU) means any component or subassembly of an item or unit of Hardware that
reasonably can be replaced at Customer's location. FRUs also may be subject to size and weight
limitations.
Four-hour Response means:
(i) For Advance Replacement Service, the four-hour time period commences upon the Cisco problem
diagnosis and determination that a FRU is required and ends when the FRU is delivered onsite.
(ii) For onsite service, the four-hour time period commences upon the Cisco problem diagnosis and
determination that remedial onsite service is required and ends when Cisco personnel arrive onsite.
Indirect Purchases means purchases of Services by Customer through an Authorized Channel.
Intellectual Property means any and all tangible and intangible: (i) rights associated with works of
authorship throughout the world, including but not limited to copyrights, neighboring rights, moral rights,
and mask works, and all derivative works thereof, (ii) trademark and trade name rights and similar rights,
(iii) trade secret rights, (iv) patents, designs, algorithms and other industrial property rights, (v) all other
intellectual and industrial property rights (of every kind and nature throughout the world and however
designated) whether arising by operation of law, contract, license, or otherwise, and (vi) all registrations,
initial applications, renewals, extensions, continuations, divisions or reissues thereof now or hereafter in
force (including any rights in any of the foregoing).
Level 1 means support that is defined as having the necessary technical staff (Cisco or Cisco-authorized
reseller) with appropriate skill, perform installations, Remedial Hardware Maintenance, and basic
Hardware and Software configuration on Cisco Products.
Level 2 means support that is defined as having the necessary technical staff with the appropriate skills
to perform isolation, replication and diagnosis of internet-based problems on Cisco Product(s). Customer
shall not report Software bugs to Cisco prior to attempting to identify the source of such bugs and testing
in Customer's Network where appropriate. If the Customer cannot duplicate the bug in Customer's
Network, Customer and Cisco shall cooperate in attempting to replicate and resolve related Software
bugs in either Customer's or Cisco's test facility as mutually agreed. In all cases Customer will address
Software bugs on a best effort basis to replicate same in Customer's Network and document activity to
Cisco before seeking further resolution with Cisco's participation.
Local Time means local time on Business Days.
Maintenance Release means an incremental Software release that provides maintenance fixes and may
provide additional Software functions. Cisco designates Maintenance Releases as a change in the digits
to the right of the tenths digit or of the hundredths digit of the Software version number [x.x.(x) or
x.x.x.(x)].
Major Release means a release of Software that provides additional software functions. Cisco
designates Major Releases as a change in the ones digit of the Software version number [(x).x.x].
Minor Release means an incremental release of Software that provides maintenance fixes and additional
Software functions. Cisco designates Minor releases as a change in the tenths digit of the Software
version number [x.(x).x].
Network means a set of interconnected and interworking Cisco supported Hardware and Software that is
implemented, operated, and supported by Customer from a single network operations center (NOC).
Network Infrastructure means your core transport and aggregation Network technology (for example,
metro optical, ATM/Frame Relay, IP core and Cisco security devices including, but not limited to, Firewall,
IDS and VPN3000).
Network Infrastructure Size means the total value of Products in Customer's Network based on the
global list price of the Products that Customer has purchased.
Remedial Hardware Maintenance means diagnosis and onsite replacement of Hardware components
with FRUs.
Page 208
Attachment A, Exhibit 2, Attachment 1: Page 35 of 37
Reports means reports, recommendations, network configuration diagrams, and related non-Software
Deliverables provided by Cisco to Customer pursuant to this Agreement.
Scripts means software scripts, macros and batch files provided by Cisco to Customer pursuant to this
Agreement.
Services means one or more of the services options selected by the Customer in its Purchase Order and
described at: http://www.cisco.com/go/servicedescriptions
Services Descriptions mean the detailed descriptions of the Services purchased by Customer which are
incorporated into this Services Exhibit by reference.
Standard Business Hours means (i) 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Depot time, on Business Days for
replacement of failed Products and (ii) 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Local Time at location of the respective Cisco
TAC, on Business Days for case handling of TAC calls.
TAC means the Cisco Technical Assistance Center.
Technical Support Services means Services that provide both essential proactive and reactive operation and
maintenance support Services identified as Technical Support Services at
http://www.cisco.com/go/servicedescriptions.
Technology Application means specific technologies including, but not limited to, content networking,
broadband, and IP telephony that do not operate at the Network Infrastructure level.
Third Party Products means third party hardware and/or software, and all upgrades/updates thereto,
that are designated by Cisco as required for:
(i) The operation of Application Software in conformance with Cisco applicable Application Software
Documentation; and
(ii) Cisco support of the Application Software.
Transactional Advanced Services means the project related or consultancy Services sold under a
Statement of Work.
Two-hour Response means:
(i) For Advance Replacement, the two-hour time period commencing wi
and determination that a FRU is required and ending when the FRU is delivered onsite.
(ii) For onsite service, the two-hour time period commencing with our problem diagnosis and
determination that remedial onsite service is required and ending when Cisco personnel arrive
onsite.
Update means Cisco Software Maintenance Releases, Minor Releases and Major Releases containing
the same configuration or feature set as originally acquired, unless the Customer has upgraded the
applicable Hardware or Software to a configuration or feature set other than what was originally acquired,
and the applicable license fee for that upgrade has been paid. Updates do not include Feature Set
Upgrades.
Page 209
Attachment A, Exhibit 2, Attachment 2: Page 36 of 37
EXHIBIT 2 -- ATTACHMENT 2
CISCO SEVERITY AND ESCALATION GUIDELINES
Customer shall assign a severity to all problems submitted to Cisco.
Severity 1
operation. Customer and Cisco both will commit full-time resources to resolve the situation.
Severity 2 means operation of an existing Network is severely degraded or significant aspects of
Customer and Cisco both will commit full-time resources during Standard Business Hours to resolve the
situation.
Severity 3 means operational performance of the Network is impaired, although most business
operations remain functional. Customer and Cisco both are willing to commit resources during Standard
Business Hours to restore service to satisfactory levels.
Severity 4 means information is required on Application Software capabilities, installation, or
h are
willing to provide resources during Standard Business Hours to provide information or assistance as
requested.
If you do not believe that adequate progress is being made or that the quality of Cisco service is
satisfactory, we encourage you to escalate the problem to the appropriate level of management by asking
for the TAC duty manager.
Cisco Escalation Guideline
Elapsed Time* Severity 1 Severity 2 Severity 3 Severity 4
1 hour Customer
Engineering
Manager
4 hours Technical
Support Director
Customer
Engineering
Manager
24 hours Vice President,
Customer
Advocacy
Technical
Support Director
48 hours President/CEO Vice President,
Customer
Advocacy
72 hours Customer
Engineering
Manager
96 hours President/CEO Technical
Support Director
Customer
Engineering
Manager
*Severity 1 escalation times are measured in calendar hours 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
Severity 2, 3, and 4 escalation times correspond with Standard Business Hours.
Page 210
Attachment A, Exhibit 2, Attachment 3: Page 37 of 37
EXHIBIT 2 -- ATTACHMENT 3
SERVICES NOT COVERED
Services that are not expressly set forth in the applicable Service Description or Statement of Work
document are not covered under such Service Description or Statement of Work, including, without
limitation, the following:
1. Services are only provided for generally available Products and Software releases/versions, unless
agreed otherwise.
2. Any customization of, or labor to install, Software and Hardware (including installation of Updates).
3. Furnishing of supplies, accessories or the replacement of expendable parts (e.g., cables, blower
assemblies, power cords, and rack mounting kits).
4. Electrical or site work external to the Products.
5.
by Cisco.
6. Service for Hardware that is installed outdoors or that is installed indoors but requires special
equipment to perform such Service.
7. Hardware replacement in quantities greater than three (3) FRUs, including those replacements due to
pervasive issues documented in an engineering change notice or field alert unless End User has
troubleshot failed Hardware down to the FRU level.
8. Services performed at domestic residences.
9. Support or replacement of Product that is altered, modified, mishandled, destroyed or damaged by
one or more of the following: (a) natural causes; (b) environmental failures; (c) your failure to take any
required actions; (d) a negligent or willful act or omission by you or use by you other than as specified
in the applicable Cisco-supplied documentation; or (e) an act or omission of a third party.
10. Services or software to resolve Software or Hardware problems resulting from third party product or
document.
11. Services for non-Cisco Software installed on any Cisco Product.
12. Any Hardware or third party product upgrade required to run new or updated Software.
13. Erasure or other removal of any customer or third party data on Products (or parts thereof) returned,
repaired or otherwise handled by Cisco.
14. Additional Services are provided at the then-current time and materials rates.
15. Except as otherwise agreed, Software entitlement, including media, documentation, binary code,
source code or access in electronic or other form is not provided. In addition, except as otherwise
provided, no right, use or license to our Software is granted and you acknowledge and agree that you
obtain no such rights.
16. Application Software is not supported as part of the SMARTnet support services provided by Cisco
and is only supported under a separate service description.
The non-entitlement policies posted at http://www.cisco.com/go/warranty are hereby incorporated into this
Agreement by this reference.
Capitalized terms are defined in the Glossary of Terms, or may be as set forth in the applicable Service
Description or Statement of Work.
Page 211
Attachment B: Page 1 of 11 Att
Attachment B Scope of Services Awarded to Contractor
I.Data Communications Award Categories
The scope for this contract is as provided below. Contractor may offer products (i.e. white box, artificial
intelligence, etc.) and services within the Categories it received an award in. Each category also allows for
Internet of Things (IoT) products. These products must be an IoT product that can be deployed within,
needs. Proposals are expected to include IoT products designed to support common government lines of
business in specific subcategories i.e. routers, switches, end points, etc. IoT products can only be provided
in categories that the vendor is awarded in and can include endpoints that support items in that category.
Category 1.1: UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS (UC).
A set of products that provides a consistent unified user interface and user experience across multiple
devices and modes of communications. Unified Communications that is able to provide services such as
session management, voice, video, messaging, mobility, and meeting solutions (i.e., web, audio, IM&P,
file sharing, white boarding, guest support, etc.). It can provide the foundation for advanced unified
communications capabilities of IM and presence-based services and extends telephony features and
capabilities to packet telephony network devices such as IP phones, media processing devices, Voice over
IP (VoIP) gateways, and multimedia applications. Additional services, such as unified messaging,
multimedia conferencing, collaborative contact centers, and interactive multimedia response systems, are
made possible through open telephony APIs. General UC solution capabilities should include:
High Availability for Call Processing
Hardware Platform High Availability
Network Connectivity High Availability
PSTN Access resiliency
Call Processing Redundancy
Optional Branch Office Survivability Services
1.1.1 IP Telephony
call setup and teardown, and telephony features) over IP, instead of using circuit-switched or other
modalities. Capabilities should include:
Support for analog, digital, and IP endpoints
Centralized Management
Enterprise Telephony Features (CFx, Transfer, CID, Shared line appearance, One Number
Service, etc.)
Provide basic hunt group and call queuing capabilities
Flexibility to configure queue depth and hold time, play unique announcements and Music on
Hold (MoH), log in and log out users from a queue and basic queue statistics (from the phone
E911 Support
o National E911 Routing Services (proper PSAP routing when PSTN access is centralized)
o 911 Device Tracking Services
o 911 On-Site Notification Services
1.1.2 Instant messaging/ Presence
within the enterprise, and remotely, as well as with guest users that offers quick transmission of text-
based messages from sender to receiver. In push mode between two or more people using personal
computers, Desktop (Windows/Mac/VDI/Linux), Mobile/Smartphone, Tablet, along with shared clients,
instant messaging basically offers real-time direct written language-based online chat. Instant messaging
may also provide video calling, file sharing, PC-to-PC voice calling and PC-to-regular-phone calling.
Page 212
Attachment B: Page 2 of 11 Att
IM Persistency / Workstream Collab
File Sharing Services, Desktop Sharing Services
1.1.3 Unified messaging
(e-mail, SMS, Fax, voicemail, video messaging, etc.) technologies into a single interface, accessible from
a variety of different devices.
Ability to access and manage voice messages in a variety of ways, using email inbox, Web
browser, desktop client, VoIP phone, or mobile phone
Visual Voicemail Support (Optional)
ASR / Transcription Services for recorded messages
1.1.4 Contact Center -based system that provides call and contact routing for high-
-time
contact management system. The definition includes all contact center systems that provide inbound
contact handling capabilities, outbound call/contact center and automatic contact distribution, combined
with a high degree of sophistication in terms of dynamic contact traffic routing management.
1.1.5 Communications End Points and Applications
Attendant Consoles (Telephone Station)
IP Phones (desktop devices and accessories)
Room Based Conferencing Endpoints (Conf Phones, SparkBoard, JamBoard, Surface Hub)
1.1.6 UC Network Monitoring -to-end service management for Unified
Communications. Capabilities include testing, performance monitoring, configuration management,
accounting/billing, analytics (capacity planning), contact center specialized reports (utilization, queue KIIs,
call abandonment rations, etc.), and business intelligence reporting.
1.1.7 Collaboration
ware or
hardware.
1.1.8 Collaborative Video A set of immersive video technologies that enable people to feel or appear
as if they were present in a location that they are not physically in. Immersive video consists of a multiple
codec video system, where each
see/talk to every other member on a screen (or screens) as if they were in the same room and provides
call control that enables intelligent video bandwidth management.
1.1.9 Content Delivery Systems (CDS) A large distributed system of servers deployed in multiple
data centers connected by the Internet. The purpose of the content delivery system is to serve content
to a very large number of end-users (i.e., quarterly all hands meetings/webinar) with high availability and
high performance. CDSs serve content over the Internet, including web objects (text, graphics, URLs, and
scripts), downloadable objects (media files, software, documents), applications (e-commerce, portals),
live streaming media, on-demand streaming media, and social networks.
Category 1.2: NETWORKING.
1.2.1 Network Application Services.
Application networking solutions and technologies that enable the successful and secure delivery of
applications to local, remote, and branch-office users using technology to accelerate, secure, and increase
availability of both application traffic and computing resources.
Page 213
Attachment B: Page 3 of 11 Att
1.2.1.1 Virtualized Load Balancers
and/or application traffic across multiple servers to improve the concurrent user capacity and overall
reliability of applications. Capabilities should include:
SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) Off-loading
Caching capabilities
Layer 4 Load Balancing
Layer 7 Load Balancing
Detailed Reporting
Supports multiple load balancers in the same system for multiple groups
Supports TLS1.2
1.2.1.2 WAN Optimization An appliance utilizing a collection of techniques for increasing data-transfer
efficiencies across wide-area networks (WAN). Capabilities should include:
CIFS (Common Internet File System) acceleration
Data Compression
SSL encryption/decryption for acceleration (Optional)
Layer 4-7 visibility
Application Specific optimization
Network analysis tools (solutions utilized to collect, classify, analyze, and securely store log messages)
1.2.2 Networking Software.
Software that runs on a server, or within the Cloud, and enables the server to manage data, users, groups,
security, applications, and other networking functions. The network operating system is designed to allow
transfer of data among multiple computers in a network, typically a local area network (LAN), a private
network or to other networks. Networking software capabilities should include:
Restartable Process
High availability options
Targeted operating systems, i.e. DC, campus, core, wan, etc.
Operating System Efficiencies
Network analysis tools (solutions utilized to collect, classify, analyze, and securely store log
messages).
1.2.2.1 Network Management and Automation
automation, cloud computing, and IT systems management.
1.2.2.2 Data Center Management and Automation and
automate manual tasks across servers, network, applications, and virtualized infrastructure.
1.2.2.3 Cloud Portal and Automation
policy-based controls for provisioning virtual and physical resources.
1.2.2.4 Branch Office Management and Automation ions for
management of branch offices. Capabilities include remote troubleshooting, device management, and
WAN performance monitoring.
1.2.3 Network Optimization and Acceleration.
Devices and tools for increasing data-transfer efficiencies across wide-area networks.
Page 214
Attachment B: Page 4 of 11 Att
1.2.3.1 Data Analytics
issues related to congestion, such as utilization, service consumption and routing. Provides real-time
insights into network traffic to determine the value of different portions of that traffic.
1.2.3.2 Dynamic Load Balancing
of checks and calculations to determine which server can best service each client request in order to select
the server that can successfully fulfill the client request and do so in the shortest amount of time without
overloading either the server or the server farm as a whole.
1.2.3.3 WAN Acceleration
on a wide area network (WAN). Capabilities should include:
CIFS acceleration
Data Compression
SSL encryption/decryption for acceleration (Optional)
Layer 4-7 visibility
Application Specific optimization
1.2.3.4 High Availability and Redundancy Limits any disruption to network uptime should an
appliance face unforeseen performance issues. Transparently redistributes workloads to surviving cluster
appliances without impacting communication throughout the cluster.
1.2.4 Optical Networking.
High capacity networks based on optical technology and components that provide routing, grooming, and
restoration at the wavelength level as well as wavelength based services.
1.2.4.1 Core DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) Switches
systems designed for long haul and ultra long-haul optical networking applications.
1.2.4.2 Edge Optical Switches
networks.
1.2.4.3 Optical Network Management Provides capabilities to manage the optical network and allows
operators to execute end-to-end circuit creation.
1.2.4.4 IP over DWDM (IPoDWDM)
(Optical Transport Network).
Category 1.3: ROUTERS, SWITCHES, SECURITY, AND NETWORKING STORAGE.
1.3.1 Routers.
A device that forwards data packets along networks. A router is connected to at least two networks, commonly two
LANs or WANs or a LAN and its ISP's network. Routers are located at gateways, the places where two or more
networks connect, and are the critical device that keeps data flowing between networks and keep the networks
connected to the Internet.
1.3.1.1 Branch Routers
numbers of users and supports flexible configurations/feature. For example: security, VoIP, wan
acceleration, etc.
1.3.1.2 Network Edge Routers A specialized router residing at the edge or boundary of a network. This
router ensures the connectivity of its network with external networks, a wide area network or the Internet.
An edge router uses an External Border Gateway Protocol, which is used extensively over the Internet to
provide connectivity with remote networks.
Page 215
Attachment B: Page 5 of 11 Att
1.3.1.3 Core Routers - High performance, high speed, low latency routers that enable Enterprises to
deliver a suite of data, voice, and video services to enable next-generation applications such as IPTV and
Video on Demand (VoD), and Software as a Service (SaaS).
1.3.1.4 Service Aggregation Routers
Ethernet and IP/MPLS networks to enable service providers and enterprise edge networks simultaneously
host resource-intensive integrated data, voice and video business and consumer services.
1.3.1.5 Carrier Ethernet Routers
suite of data, voice, and video services to enable next-generation applications such as IPTV, Video on
Demand (VoD), and Software as a Service (SaaS).
1.3.2 Security.
1.3.2.1 Data Center and Virtualization Security Products and Appliances Products designed to
protect high-value data and data center resources with threat defense and policy control.
1.3.2.2 Intrusion Detection/Protection and Firewall Appliances
network firewall security from worms, Trojans, spyware, key loggers, and other malware. This includes
Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW), which offer a wire-speed integrated network platform that performs
deep inspection of traffic and blocking of attacks. Intrusion Detection/Protection and Firewall Appliances
should provide:
Non-disruptive in-line bump-in-the-wire configuration
Standard first-generation firewall capabilities, e.g., network-address translation (NAT), stateful
protocol inspection (SPI) and virtual private networking (VPN), etc.
Application awareness, full stack visibility and granular control
Capability to incorporate information from outside the firewall, e.g., directory-based policy,
blacklists, white lists, etc.
Upgrade path to include future information feeds and security threats
SSL decryption to enable identifying undesirable encrypted applications (Optional)
1.3.2.3 Logging Appliances and Analysis Tools Solutions utilized to collect, classify, analyze, and
securely store log messages.
1.3.2.4 Secure Edge and Branch Integrated Security Products
intrusion prevention for branches and the network edge. Products typically consist of appliances or
routers.
1.3.2.5 Secure Mobility Products
multiple mobile devices.
1.3.2.6 Encryption Appliances
transfer layer - above the data link level, but below the application level.
1.3.2.7 On-premise and Cloud-based services for Network Communications Integrity
that provide threat protection, data loss prevention, message level encryption, acceptable use and
application control capabilities to secure web and email communications. This could include cloud access
security brokers (CASBs) and DNS security.
1.3.2.8 Secure Access
personally owned mobile devices (laptops, tablets, and smart phones). Capabilities should include:
Management visibility for device access
Self-service on-boarding
Page 216
Attachment B: Page 6 of 11 Att
Centralized policy enforcement
Differentiated access and services
Device Management
1.3.3 Storage Networking.
High-speed network of shared storage devices connecting different types of storage devices with data
servers.
1.3.3.1 Director Class SAN (Storage Area Network) Switches and Modules -
performance, and protocol-independent designed primarily to fulfill the role of core switch in a core-edge
Fibre Channel (FC), FCOE or similar SAN topology. A Fibre Channel director is, by current convention, a
switch with at least 128 ports. It does not differ from a switch in core FC protocol functionality. Fibre
Channel directors provide the most reliable, scalable, high-performance foundation for private cloud
storage and highly virtualized environments.
1.3.3.2 Fabric and Blade Server Switches
with the Fibre Channel (FC) protocol. It allows the creation of a Fibre Channel fabric, which is currently the
core component of most SANs. The fabric is a network of Fibre Channel devices, which allows many-to-
many communication, device name lookup, security, and redundancy. FC switches implement zoning; a
mechanism that disables unwanted traffic between certain fabric nodes.
1.3.3.3 Enterprise and Data Center SAN and VSAN (Virtual Storage Area Network) Management -
Management tools to provisions, monitors, troubleshoot, and administers SANs and VSANs.
1.3.3.4 SAN Optimization Tools to help optimize and secure SAN performance (ie. Encryption of
data- at-rest, data migration, capacity optimization, data reduction, etc.
1.3.4 : Switches.
Layer 2/3 devices that are used to connect segments of a LAN (local area network) or multiple LANs and
to filter and forward packets among them.
1.3.4.1 Campus LAN Access Switches
controls user and workgroup access to internetwork resources. The following are some of the features a
campus LAN access switch should support:
1.Security
a.SSHv2 (Secure Shell Version 2)
b.802.1X (Port Based Network Access Control)
c.Port Security
d.DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) Snooping
2.VLANs
3.Fast Ethernet/Gigabit Ethernet
4.PoE (Power over Ethernet)
5.link aggregation
6.10 Gb support
7.Port mirroring
8.Span Taps
9.Support of IPv6 and IPv4
10.Standards-based rapid spanning tree
11.NetFlow Support (Optional).
Page 217
Attachment B: Page 7 of 11 Att
1.3.4.2 Campus LAN Core Switches
backbone and are responsible for transporting large amounts of traffic both reliably and quickly. Core
switches should provide:
High bandwidth
Low latency
Hot swappable power supplies and fans
Security
o SSHv2
o MacSec encryption
o Role-Based Access Control Lists (ACL)
Support of IPv6 and IPv4
1/10/40/100 Gbps support
IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) routing
EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol) routing
VPLS (Virtual Private LAN Service) Support
VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) Support
NetFlow Support.
1.3.4.3 Campus Distribution Switches
forward it to the core layer switches. Traffic that is generated at Layer 2 on a switched network needs to
be managed, or segmented into Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs), Distribution layer switches
provides the inter-VLAN routing functions so that one VLAN can communicate with another on the
network. Distribution layer switches provides advanced security policies that can be applied to network
traffic using Access Control Lists (ACLs).
High bandwidth
Low latency
Hot swappable power supplies and fans
Security (SSHv2 and/or 802.1X)
Support of IPv6 and IPv4
Jumbo Frames Support
Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP)
Per-VLAN Rapid Spanning Tree (PVRST+)
Switch-port auto recovery
NetFlow Support or equivalent
1.3.4.4 Data Center Switches
data center by switching or routing good ones to their final destinations, and discard unwanted traffic
using Access Control Lists (ACLs) a minimum of 10 Gigabit speeds. High availability and modularity
differentiates a typical Layer 2/3 switch from a data center switch. Capabilities should include:
High bandwidth
Low latency
Hot swappable power supplies and fans
Ultra-low latency through wire-speed ports with nanosecond port-to-port latency and hardware-
based Inter-Switch Link (ISL) trunking
Load Balancing across Trunk group able to use packet based load balancing scheme
Bridging of Fibre Channel SANs and Ethernet fabrics
Jumbo Frame Support
Page 218
Attachment B: Page 8 of 11 Att
Plug and Play Fabric formation that allows a new switch that joins the fabric to automatically
become a member
Ability to remotely disable and enable individual ports
Support NetFlow or equivalent
1.3.4.5 An application in SDN that manages flow control to
enable intelligent networking.
1.3.4.6 Software Defined Networks (SDN) - Virtualized Switches and Routers Technology utilized
to support software manipulation of hardware for specific use cases.
1.3.4.7 Software Defined Networks (SDN) Controllers - is an application in software-defined
networking (SDN) that manages flow control to enable intelligent networking. SDN controllers are based
on protocols, such as OpenFlow, that allow servers to tell switches where to send packets. The SDN
controller lies between network devices at one end and applications at the other end. Any
communications between applications and devices have to go through the controller. The controller uses
multiple routing protocols including OpenFlow to configure network devices and choose the optimal
network path for application traffic.
1.3.4.8 Carrier Aggregation Switches Carrier aggregation switches route traffic in addition to
are:
Designed for Metro Ethernet networks
Designed for video and other high bandwidth applications
Supports a variety of interface types, especially those commonly used by Service Providers
Capabilities should include:
Redundant Processors
Redundant Power
IPv4 and IPv6 unicast and multicast
High bandwidth
Low latency
Hot swappable power supplies and fans
MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching)
BGP (Border Gateway Protocol)
Software router virtualization and/or multiple routing tables
Policy based routing
Layer 2 functionality
o Per VLAN Spanning Tree
o Rapid Spanning Tree
o VLAN IDs up to 4096
o Layer 2 Class of Service (IEEE 802.1p)
o Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP)
o QinQ (IEEE 802.1ad)
1.3.4.9 Carrier Ethernet Access Switches directly to the
customer or be utilized as a network interface on the service side to provide layer 2 services.
Hot-swappable and field-replaceable integrated power supply and fan tray
AC or DC power supply with minimum DC input ranging from 18V to 32 VDC and 36V to 72 VDC
Ethernet and console port for manageability
Page 219
Attachment B: Page 9 of 11 Att
SD flash card slot for additional external storage
Stratum 3 network clock
Line-rate performance with a minimum of 62-million packets per second (MPPS) forwarding rate
Support for dying gasp on loss of power
Support for a variety of small form factor pluggable transceiver (SFP and SFP+) with support for
Device Object Model (DOM)
Timing services for a converged access network to support mobile solutions, including Radio
Access Network (RAN) applications
Support for Synchronous Ethernet (SyncE) services
Supports Hierarchical Quality of Service (H-QoS) to provide granular traffic-shaping policies
Supports Resilient Ethernet Protocol REP/G.8032 for rapid layer-two convergence
Category 1.4: WIRELESS.
Provides connectivity to wireless devices within a limited geographic area. System capabilities should
include:
Redundancy and automatic failover
IPv6 compatibility
NTP Support
1.4.1 Access Points nnect
to a wired network using Wi-Fi, or related standards. Capabilities should include:
802.11a/b/g/n
802.11n
802.11ac
Capable of controller discovery method via DHCP (onsite controller or offsite through Cloud
Architecture)
UL2043 plenum rated for safe mounting in a variety of indoor environments
Support AES-CCMP (128-bit)
Provides real-time wireless intrusion monitoring and detection
1.4.2 Outdoor Wireless Access Points
or other type of mount. During operations they can tolerate a wide temperature range, high humidity and
exposure to water, dust, and oil. Capabilities should include:
Flexible Deployment Options
Provides real-time wireless intrusion monitoring and detection
Capable of controller discovery method via DHCP (onsite controller or offsite through Cloud
Architecture)
1.4.3 Wireless LAN Controllers -weight access
points in large quantities by the network administrator or network operations center. The WLAN controller
automatically handles the configuration of wireless access-points. Capabilities should include:
Ability to monitor and mitigate RF interference/self-heal
Support seamless roaming from AP to AP without requiring re-authentication
Support configurable access control lists to filter traffic and denying wireless peer to peer traffic
System encrypts all management layer traffic and passes it through a secure tunnel
Page 220
Attachment B: Page 10 of 11Att
Policy management of users and devices provides ability to de-authorize or deny devices without
denying the credentials of the user, nor disrupting other AP traffic
Support configurable access control lists to filter traffic and denying wireless peer to peer traffic
1.4.4 Wireless LAN Network Services and Management
plan, configure and deploy a wireless network, as well as provide additional WLAN services. Some
examples include wireless security, asset tracking, and location services. Capabilities should include:
Provide for redundancy and automatic failover
Historical trend and real time performance reporting is supported
Management access to wireless network components is secured
SNMPv3 enabled
RFC 1213 compliant
Automatically discover wireless network components
Capability to alert for outages and utilization threshold exceptions
mDNS
QoS / Application identification capability
1.4.5 Cloud-based services for Access Points -based management of campus-wide WiFi
deployments and distributed multi-site networks. Capabilities include:
Zero-touch access point provisioning
Network-wide visibility and control
RF optimization,
Firmware updates
1.4.6 Mobile Device Management (MDM) MDM technology utilized to allow employees to bring
personally owned mobile devices (laptops, tablets, and smart phones) to their workplace, and use those
devices to access privileged government information and applications in a secure manner. Capabilities
should include:
Ability to apply corporate policy to new devices accessing the network resources, whether wired
or wireless
Provide user and devices authentication to the network
Provide secure remote access capability
Support 802.1x
Network optimization for performance, scalability, and user experience
Category 1.5: FACILITY MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND CONTROL.
Technology utilized in the management, monitoring and control of facilities. Technologies include:
a.Access control systems
b.Detection/Identification systems, such as surveillance systems, closed circuit television
cameras, or IP camera networks and the associated monitoring systems.
c.Response systems such as alert systems, desktop monitoring systems, radios, and
digital signage.
d.Building and energy controls
Page 221
Attachment B: Page 11 of 11Att
II.Value Added Services
For each Award Category above, the following valued services should also be available for procurement
at the time of product purchase or anytime afterwards. This provided list of value added services is not
intended to be exhaustive, and may be updated pursuant to the terms of the resulting Master Agreement
2.1 Maintenance Services
hardware coverage, and smart, proactive device diagnostics for hardware.
2.2 Professional Services
a.Deployment Services
i.Survey/ Design Services Includes, but not limited to, discovery, design, architecture
review/validation, and readiness assessment.
ii. and
configuration or end-to-end integration and deployment.
iii.
readiness, identify ways to increase efficiencies throughout the network, and optimize
s and service management.
b.
management, problem management, change management, and utilization and performance
reporting that may be on a subscription basis.
c.Consultin reliability,
d.
roadmaps for
management.
e.Statement of Work (SOW) Services Customer-specific tasks to be accomplished and/or services
requirements.
f.Testing Services Includes, but not limited to, testing the availability, reliability, security and
solutions
2.3 Services Fulfillment Partners.
a.Subject Fulfillment Partner, many
Fulfillment Partners can also offer and provide some or all of the Services as listed above at
competitive pricing, along with local presence and support. Contractor, as the prime, has sole
discretion to determine what Services as listed above may be provided by the Fulfillment
Partners. As the primary Contractor (OEM), Contractor is ultimately responsible for the service
and performance of its Fulfillment Partners. Customers may have the option to purchase the
Services to be directly delivered by Contractor (OEM) or its certified Fulfillment Partners.
2.4 Training including but not
limited to designing, implementing, operating, configuring, and troubleshooting network systems
pertaining to items provided under the master agreement.
Page 222
Attachment C: Page 1 of 1 Att
Contractor
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Section 1: Pricing
Notes
1. % discounts are based on minimum discounts off Contractor's commercially published pricelists versus fixed pricing.
as the ability to update and
2. Minimum guaranteed contract discounts do not preclude Contractor and/or its Fulfillment Partners from
providing deeper or additional, incremental discounts at their sole discretion.
3. Purchasing Entities shall benefit from any promotional pricing offered by Contractor to similar customers.
Promotional pricing shall not be cause for a permanent price change.
4. Contractor's price catalog shall only include offers that are in contract scope and within the awarded categories.
Quotes to eligible Purchasing Entities shall be based on the approved price catalog as posted on the NASPO
website as well as the mandatory contract webpage.
Section 2: Minimum Discount % off List
Category 1.1 Unified Communications (UC)
Hardware and Software (on premise) 35.00%
Cloud Services 10.00%
Service Packages (i.e., Maintenance, etc.) 10.00%
Category 1.2 Networking
Hardware and Software (on premise) 35.00%
Cloud Services 10.00%
Service Packages (i.e., Maintenance, etc.) 10.00%
Category 1.3 Routers, Switches, Secuirty, and Networking Storage
Hardware and Software (on premise) 35.00%
Cloud Services 10.00%
Service Packages (i.e., Maintenance, etc.) 10.00%
Category 1.4 Wireless
Hardware and Software (on premise) 35.00%
Cloud Services 10.00%
Service Packages (i.e., Maintenance, etc.) 10.00%
Category 1.5 Facility Management, Monitoring, and Control
Hardware and Software (on premise) 35.00%
Cloud Services 10.00%
Service Packages (i.e., Maintenance, etc.) 10.00%
Section 3: Value Added Services
Hourly Rates
Weekday Weekend State Holiday
Title Job Description Onsite Remote Onsite Remote Onsite Remote
Maintenance Services
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
Professional Services
i.e. Cisco Advanced Services, IoT, NTE
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
Deployment Services
i.e. Cisco Implementation Services, IoT,
NTE
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
Consulting Advisory Services i.e. Cisco Advisory Services, IoT, NTE $743.17 $661.17 $743.17 $661.17 $743.17 $661.17
Architectural Design Services
i.e. Cisco Advanced Services, IoT, NTE
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
Statement of Work Services
i.e. Cisco Advanced Services, IoT, NTE
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
$743.17
$661.17
Partner Services
Basic Install & Config Only (i.e. rack &
stack, cabling, etc.), IoT, NTE
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
Training Deployment Services
i.e. Software Adoption, Cisco Training
Services, NTE
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
$600.00
$525.00
Page 223
Page 1 of 9
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM NUMBER 7-20-70-47-01
DATA COMMUNICATIONS
Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number AR3227
Cisco Systems, Inc. (Contractor)
This Participating Addendum Number 7-20-70-47-01 is entered into between the state
of California, Department of General Services (hereafter referred to as “State” or “DGS”)
and Cisco Systems, Inc. (hereafter referred to as “Contractor”) under the lead state of
Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number AR3227.
1. SCOPE
A. This Participating Addendum covers the purchase of Data Communications
products and associated services under the Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master
Agreement. The Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number AR3227 is
hereby incorporated by reference. Product/service categories included under
this Participating Addendum are identified in Section 5 (Available Products and
Services).
B. This Participating Addendum is available for use by California state agencies and
local governments. A local government is defined as any city, county, city and
county, district, or other local governmental body, school district or corporation
empowered to expend public funds. The State Agency Listing
(https://www.ca.gov/agenciesall/) provides a comprehensive list of state
agencies.
C. Each local government is to make its own determination whether this
Participating Addendum and the Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement are
consistent with its procurement policies and regulations.
2. TERM
A. The term of this Participating Addendum shall begin June 1, 2021, or upon signature
approval by the State, whichever is later and will end September 30, 2024, or upon
termination by the State, whichever occurs first.
B. Lead State amendments to extend the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement
term date are not automatically incorporated into this Participating Addendum.
Extension(s) to the term of this Participating Addendum will be through a written
amendment upon mutual agreement between the State and the Contractor.
C. Order placement and execution shall be on or before the expiration of this
Participating Addendum. However, delivery of products or completion of services
may be after the Participating Addendum expiration date.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 224
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 2 of 9
3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS/INCORPORATION OF DOCUMENTS
A. Terms and conditions listed below are hereby incorporated by reference and
made a part of this Participating Addendum as if attached herein and shall apply
to the purchase of goods or services made under this Participating Addendum.
1) General Provisions – Information Technology (GSPD-401IT) effective
9/5/2014. This document can be viewed on the DGS Procurement Division
website (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/PD/Resources/Page-Content/Procurement-
Division-Resources-List-Folder/Model-Contract-Language ).
2) Cloud Computing Software as a Service (SaaS) General Provisions effective
6/7/2019. This document can be viewed on the DGS Procurement Division
website (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/PD/Resources/Page- Content/Procurement-
Division-Resources-List-Folder/Model-Contract- Language).
3) Cloud Computing Special Provisions for Software as a Service (SaaS)
effective 03/15/18. This document can be viewed on the DGS Procurement
Division website (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/PD/Resources/Page-
Content/Procurement-Division-Resources-List-Folder/Model-Contract-
Language).
4. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
A. In the event of any inconsistency between the articles, attachments, or provisions
which constitute this agreement, the following descending order of precedence
shall apply:
1) California Participating Addendum Number 7-20-70-47-01
2) Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number AR3227
5. AVAILABLE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
A. The following product and service categories are listed in the Utah NASPO
ValuePoint Master Agreement AR3227:
1) Category 1.1 Unified Communications
2) Category 1.2 Networking
3) Category 1.3 Routers, Switches, Security, and Storage Networking
4) Category 1.4 Wireless
5) Category 1.5 Facility Management, Monitoring, and Control
6) Category 2.1 Maintenance Services
7) Category 2.2 Professional Services
8) Category 2.3 Partner Services
9) Category 2.4 Training
Page 225
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 3 of 9
6. RESTRICTIONS/DISALLOWED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES (STATE
AGENCIES ONLY)
A. The following product and service offerings are prohibited for state agencies
under this Participating Addendum.
1) Leasing (Note: State agencies may utilize financing available through
DGS-PD GS $Mart program.)
These restrictions are not applicable to local governments.
B. Products and services that are available on the California Network and
Telecommunications (CALNET) Program and mandatory California statewide
contracts cannot be purchased from this Participating Addendum by non-exempt
state agencies without an exemption.
State agencies are responsible for contacting the California Department of
Technology (CDT) for CALNET contract exemptions and the DGS Procurement
Division for mandatory statewide contract exemptions in accordance with the
published User Instructions prior to issuing a purchase order.
This restriction is not applicable to local governments.
C. Services that fall within the definition of “public works” as defined in Public
Contract Code, Section 1101 and Labor Code Section 1720 are disallowed under
this cooperative agreement and must be procured by alternate means.
This restriction is not applicable to local governments.
7. PRICING
Contractor is responsible for maintaining a current price list of available products and
services on the NASPO ValuePoint Data Communications 2019-2026 website.
8. AUTHORIZED RESELLERS
A. Contractor may use State-approved Authorized Resellers under this Participating
Addendum for sales and service functions as defined herein.
1) Authorized Resellers must accept purchase orders and accept payment
from ordering agencies for products and services offered under this
Participating Addendum.
2) Authorized Resellers are responsible for sending a copy of all purchase
orders and invoices to the Contractor for compliance with quarterly usage
reporting and administrative fee requirements.
Page 226
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 4 of 9
3) All purchase documents to Authorized Resellers shall reference the
Participating Addendum Number and Contractor Name.
B. Contractor shall be responsible for successful performance and compliance with
all requirements in accordance with the terms and conditions under this
Participating Addendum, even if work is performed by Authorized Resellers. All
State policies, guidelines, and requirements shall apply to Authorized Resellers.
C. Contractor will be the sole point of contact with regard to Participating Addendum
contractual matters, reporting, and administrative fee requirements.
D. Subject to the approval of the State, Authorized Resellers may be added on a
quarterly basis during the term of the contract. Contractors shall notify the State
of any deleted Authorized Resellers or changes to current Authorized Resellers’
contact information in writing at any time during the contract term.
E. Contractor will be required to submit Authorized Reseller requests, in a format
specified by the State, to the State Contract Administrator for approval.
F. State-approved Authorized Resellers will be posted on the State’s Cal eProcure
website.
9. SUBCONTRACTORS
A. Nothing contained in this Agreement or otherwise, shall create any contractual
relation between the State and any subcontractors, and no subcontract shall
relieve Contractor of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. Contractor
agrees to be as fully responsible to the State for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of
them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by the
Contractor. Contractor's obligation to pay its subcontractors is an independent
obligation from the State's obligation to make payments to the Contractor.
B. Contractor shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within
its own organization and no portion of the work shall be subcontracted except for
subcontractors listed on the Bidder Declaration (GSPD-05-105) provided to
ordering agencies at the time an order is quoted.
C. As the prime contractor, Contractor is responsible for reports and fees required
by the terms and conditions of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement and
State Participating Addendum.
D. Any subcontract in excess of $25,000, entered into as a result of this Agreement,
shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this Agreement to be applicable to
subcontractors.
Page 227
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 5 of 9
10.ORDERING AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
A. State agency and local government use of this Participating Addendum is
optional.
B. State agencies and local governments must follow the ordering procedures
outlined within the User Instructions guide, administered by the State Contract
Administrator, to execute orders against this Participating Addendum. User
Instructions are posted on the State’s Cal eProcure website.
11. STATE AGENCY BUY RECYCLED CAMPAIGN (SABRC)
A. State agencies are required to report purchases made within the eleven product
categories in the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery’s
State Agency Buy Recycled Campaign (SABRC) per Public Contract Code
sections 12200-12217.
B. Contractor will be required to complete and return a Recycled-Content
Certification form (https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/contracts/forms) upon request
by a state agency.
12.DELIVERY
A. Delivery shall occur within 30 days after receipt of order, or as negotiated
between ordering agency and Contractor and included in the purchase order, or
as otherwise stipulated in the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement.
B. Free On Board (F.O.B.) Destination to the ordering agency’s receiving point.
13. INVOICING AND PAYMENT
A. Payment terms for this Participating Addendum are net 45 days. Payment will be
made in accordance with IT General Provisions Paragraph 30 (Required
Payment Date).
B. Invoices shall be sent to the address identified in the ordering agency’s purchase
order. The State Participating Addendum Number and ordering agency
purchase order number shall appear on each invoice for all purchases placed
under this Participating Addendum.
C. Contractor will accept the state of California credit card (CAL-Card) for payment
of invoices.
14. USAGE REPORTING
A. Contractor shall submit usage reports on a quarterly basis to the State Contract
Administrator for all California entity purchases using the report template
Page 228
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 6 of 9
attached hereto as Attachment A. The report is due even when there is no
activity.
B. The DGS Contract Administrator reserves the right to modify Attachment A and
require Contractor to provide additional order information during the course of
this Agreement.
C. The report shall be an Excel spreadsheet transmitted electronically to the DGS
Cooperatives mailbox (PDCooperatives@dgs.ca.gov).
D. Any report that does not follow the required format or that excludes information
will be deemed incomplete. Contractor will be responsible for submitting
corrected reports within five business days of the date of written notification from
the State.
E. Tax must not be included in the report, even if it is on the purchase order.
F. Reports are due for each quarter as follows:
Reporting Period Due Date
January 1 to March 31 April 30
April 1 to June 30 July 31
July 1 to September 30 October 31
October 1 to December 31 January 31
G. Failure to meet reporting requirements and submit the reports on a timely basis
shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract.
H. Time extensions may be approved only if all due reports have been submitted to
the State.
15. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
A. Contractor shall submit a check, payable to the State of California, remitted to the
Cooperative Agreement Unit for the calculated amount equal to 1.25% of the
sales for the quarterly period.
B. Contractor must include the Participating Addendum Number on the check.
Those checks submitted to the State without the Participating Addendum
Number will be returned to Contractor for additional identifying information.
C. Administrative fee checks shall be submitted to:
State of California
Department of General Services, Procurement Division
Attention: Cooperative Agreement Program
707 3rd Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202
West Sacramento, CA 95605
Page 229
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 7 of 9
D. The administrative fee shall not be included as an adjustment to Contractor’s
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement pricing.
E. The administrative fee shall not be invoiced or charged to the ordering agency.
F. Payment of the administrative fee is due irrespective of payment status on orders
or service contracts from a purchasing entity.
G. Administrative fee checks are due for each quarter as follows:
Reporting Period Due Date
January 1 to March 31 April 30
April 1 to June 30 July 31
July 1 to September 30 October 31
October 1 to December 31 January 31
H. Failure to meet administrative fee requirements and submit fees on a timely basis
shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract.
16.CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
A. The primary Contractor Contract Manager for this Participating Addendum shall
be as follows:
Contractor Contract Manager
Name: Jumana Dihu
Phone: (773) 269-6397
Email nvp-help@cisco.com
Address: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Attn: Jumana Dihu
170 West Tasman Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
B. The State Contract Administrator for this Participating Addendum shall be as
follows:
State Contract Administrator
Name: Julie Matthews
Phone: (916) 375-4612
Email Julie.Matthews@dgs.ca.gov
Page 230
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 8 of 9
State Contract Administrator
Address: State of California
Department of General Services
Procurement Division
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202
West Sacramento, CA 95605
C. Should the contact information for either party change, the party will provide
written notice with updated information no later than ten business days after the
change.
17.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The State may terminate this Participating Addendum at any time upon 30 days prior
written notice to the Contractor. Upon termination or other expiration of this
Participating Addendum, each party will assist the other party in orderly termination
of the Participating Addendum and the transfer of all assets, tangible and intangible,
as may facilitate the orderly, non-disrupted business continuation of each party.
This provision shall not relieve the Contractor of the obligation to perform under any
purchase order or other similar ordering document executed prior to the termination
becoming effective.
18.AMENDMENT
No amendment or variation of the terms of this Participating Addendum shall be
valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No
oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Participating Addendum is
binding on any of the parties.
19.AGREEMENT
A. This Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement together with its exhibits
and/or amendments, set forth the entire agreement between the parties with
respect to the subject matter of all previous communications, representations or
agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof.
Terms and conditions inconsistent with, contrary or in addition to the terms and
conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement, together
with its exhibits and/or amendments, shall not be added to or incorporated into
this Participating Addendum or the Master Agreement and its exhibits and/or
amendments, by any subsequent purchase order or otherwise, and any such
attempts to add or incorporate such terms and conditions are hereby rejected.
The terms and conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master
Agreement and its exhibits and/or amendments shall prevail and govern in the
case of any such inconsistent or additional terms.
Page 231
Participating Addendum 7-20-70-47-01
Page 9 of 9
B. By signing below Contractor agrees to offer the same products/and or services
as on the Utah NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number AR3227, at prices
equal to or lower than the prices on that contract.
C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participating Addendum
as of the date of execution by both parties below.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of General Services
CONTRACTOR
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Agency Name Contractor Name
Authorized Signature Date Signed Authorized Signature Date Signed
Printed Name/Title of Person Signing Printed Name/Title of Person Signing
707 Third Street
West Sacramento, CA 95605
170 West Tasman Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
Address Address
5/28/21
Stephanne Lim, MAU2 Supervisor
Page 232
= =
6#*= =!#,7' /+.6=#56'2=)2''-'.6=7-$'2=
=
$* '.-*+!%*.& .
'&+) +').
*'=0#26+'5=-767#,,;=#)2''=6/=#-'.&= #4+%+0#6+.)=&&'.&7-=
=#5=(/,,/95=
=)2''-'.6=+5=':6'.&'&=(2/-= '06'-$'2= =
=6/= '06'-$'2= = =
! +$'&.. .*, ( ) ") (#..+5=2'8+5'&=6/=2'#&=#5=(/,,/95=
= *'=6'2-=/(=6*+5= #4+%+0#6+.)=&&'.&7-=5*#,,=$')+.=7.'===/2=70/.=
5+).#672'=#002/8#,=$;=6*'= 6#6'=9*+%*'8'2=+5=,#6'2=#.&=9+,,='.&= '06'-$'2=
= =/2=70/.=6'2-+.#6+/.=$;=6*'= 6#6'=9*+%*'8'2=/%%725=(+256=
,,=/6*'2=6'2-5=#.&=%/.&+6+/.5=/(=6*'= #26+%+0#6+.)=&&'.&7-=5*#,,=2'-#+.=+.=(7,,=(/2%'=
#.&='(('%6=
=" =" =6*'=0#4+'5=*#8'=':'%76'&=6*+5= #4+%+0#6+.)=&&'.&7-=#5=/(=
6*'='=/(=':'%76+/.=$;=$/6*=0#36+'5=$',/9=
..
.
'1#26-'.6=/(='.'2#,= '28+%'5=
"& &"&! &
&
= *+2&= 62''6=
"'56= #%2#-'.6/== =
.
+5%/= <56'-5=.%=
="'56= #5-#.=2=
#.=/5'==
=
. .
.
#)'==/(==ATTACHMENT 3
Page 233
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager
Matt Marquez, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT:Consideration of a Three-Year Professional Services Agreement with
Empire Economics Inc., for Annual Forecasting of Expected Economic
and Housing Growth Conditions, and Supplemental Analysis as
Requested, in the Amount Not to Exceed $150,000. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a three-year Professional Services Agreement
with Empire Economics, Inc. for the development of annual forecasts of the City’s economic and
housing conditions, as well as supplemental analysis on an as-needed basis, in an amount not to
exceed $150,000.
BACKGROUND:
Over the years, the City has partnered with Empire Economics, Inc. to prepare annual forecasts
of economic and housing trends. The firm has also provided supplemental analyses on an
as-needed basis, including studies related to high-speed passenger rail. As factors influencing
the City’s economy and housing market continue to evolve, there is an ongoing need to
understand the drivers behind these changes and their impacts on the community. The City’s
previous three-year Agreement with Empire Economics, Inc. has expired, and Staff now
recommends approval of a new three-year agreement.
ANALYSIS:
As the City continues to grow and evolve, understanding changes in economic and housing trends
remains essential to informing future long-term planning and policy decisions. Empire Economics'
scope of services is expected to remain generally consistent on an annual basis. However,
supplemental work may be requested each year, or on an as-needed basis, depending on
emerging issues or specific areas of interest. Staff anticipates that the annual scope of work will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Forecast of the City’s Economic & Housing Conditions:
a. Preparation of an annual economic and housing market study, including forecasts
of changes in the City’s employment sectors and housing market, as well as
analysis of relevant monetary and fiscal policies and their potential impacts on the
City
Page 234
Page 2
3
2
2
3
2. Characteristics of Currently Active and Forthcoming Projects
a. Evaluation of competitiveness of the proposed product mixes, including expected
market-entry times based upon demand for housing and project approval status,
as well as estimated absorption schedules.
3. Analysis of Workforce Commuting Patterns:
a. Identification of workforce employment patterns across various household profiles.
Annually, the cost of services provided by Empire Economics, Inc. is expected to range between
$25,000 and $50,000, depending on the level of supplemental analysis requested. Staff
anticipates that work will commence in late January, with a presentation of key findings to follow
upon completion of the analysis. This timeline is expected to remain consistent over the three-
year term of the Agreement.
In conclusion, Staff recommends that the City Council approve a new three-year Professional
Services Agreement with Empire Economics, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000. Under
this Agreement, the City will receive annual forecasts of expected economic and housing
conditions. In addition, supplemental analyses will also be provided on an as-needed basis,
subject to staff request.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff has allocated funding for this work as part of the City’s annual budget process. Funding for
the agreement will be provided through the Economic Development budget, specifically from
account F001-CC301-SC2106. The total cost for the three-year contract period will not exceed
$150,000.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s Core Values of “Intentionally embracing and anticipating
the future”, and “Equitable prosperity for all” by ensuring that Rancho Cucamonga’s vibrant
economy ensures prosperity and opportunities now and in the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Professional Services Agreement & Scope of Work
Page 235
Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 17th day of
December, 2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal
corporation (“City”) and Empire Economics, Inc., a Corporation (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the following professional
services for a three-year period: forecasting of expected economic and housing growth
and conditions, and supplemental analysis as requested by the City and described in
Exhibit “A” (“the Project”).
B. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner
set forth and more fully described herein.
C. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws
of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a
good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the
mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Consultant’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and
professional services described in Recitals “A” above, including, but not limited to
forecast of the City’s expected economic and housing conditions and growth, and also
other services as requested, all as more fully set forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated
November 17, 2025 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and
incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to
be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein
as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and
this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the
Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a
revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to
this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 236
Page 2
percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in
writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under
this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for
professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth
in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into
this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to
undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant
hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing
the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement,
Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant
(a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has
carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the
facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard
of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably
acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or
unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant
shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s
risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years
and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties
signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not
be provided until this Agreement has been executed and above requirements have been
fulfilled.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant
shall not exceed $150,000 (One Hundred Fifty Thousand), including all out of pocket
expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not
withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall
withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any
deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be
entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance
with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall
compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
Page 237
Page 3
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the
Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra
services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate
documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in
Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, timecards, cost control sheets and other
records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for
review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Matt Marquez, Economic
Development Director or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City
Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City
Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and
Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative.
Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean
the approval of the City Representative.
5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement,
Joe Janczyk, President is hereby designated as the principal and representative of
Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and
make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is
expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this
Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the
term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient
time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the
Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Consultant’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under
Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including,
without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
Page 238
Page 4
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with
the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social
Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to
be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents
serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, from any and all
liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from
Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California
Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to
Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification
arising under this Section 6.
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files,
drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared,
created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any
and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same
(collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the
benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach
of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without
restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes,
sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under
this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its
representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no
circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings,
reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery,
notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment,
performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of
this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project,
shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of
this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above,
Page 239
Page 5
the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its
subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory
copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to
the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights
whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.
City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but
not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding
and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents
that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any
instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists,
including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of
the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full
legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the
role of city officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a
claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual
provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.
Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret
or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or
incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event
City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use
thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to
continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a
license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non-
infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times
remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to
incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of
City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or
employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes
on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold
City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against
City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant
and Consultant’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting,
statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants
that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not
Page 240
Page 6
be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant
such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to
City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this section
shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to
information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the
Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide
information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably
necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. Consultant or its
employees may be required to disclose financial interests that may foreseeably be
materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement pursuant to California
Government Code § 87100 et seq and regulations promulgated by the Fair Political
Practices Commission.
10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained
any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant,
to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person
or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee,
commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of
this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right,
at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or
to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any
such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise,
in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to
the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if
such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable
laws as described in subsection 10.1.
Page 241
Page 7
11. Indemnification.
11.1 Professional Services. In connection with its professional services,
the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of city or agency officials, (collectively, “Indemnitees”), with respect to any
and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively,
“Claims”), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and
injury to any property, to the extent the same out of, pertain to, or relate to the
negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers,
employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall reimburse all reasonable defense costs
and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection
with such defense.
11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by
Section 11.1, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees
with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or
injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to
the non-professional acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its
officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of this
Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in
connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs
and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection
with such defense.
11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any
rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the
deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this
Agreement.
11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under
or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the
termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which
Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to
an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment
against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under
this indemnity provision.
Page 242
Page 8
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives,
employees and subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State
of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the
City, having an extended reporting period of not less than
three (3) years; or Professional Liability insurance shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion
of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year
period, provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the
Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 13. Either policy shall be
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent
insurable.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no
less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or
the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence
limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
Page 243
Page 9
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the
aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City,
its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city
or agency officials, are to be covered as additional insureds
as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by
or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed
operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or
used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased,
hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of City or agency officials which are not also
limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of city or agency officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, their officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall
not contribute with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except
after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has
been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for
Page 244
Page 10
non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty
(30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of
a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall
expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against
City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials.
(6) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by
City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the
State of California and which is rated A:VII or better
according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating
Guide.
(7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other
provisions of the required policy, including breaches of
warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be
provided.
(8) Specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending
any claim against any insured, including court costs and
attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not
deplete any policy limits.
(9) Other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as
required by the City in any request for proposals applicable
to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage.Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance
coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person
authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies
shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance.
If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide
City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required
policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City
relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an
amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
Page 245
Page 11
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to
Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall
pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the
termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant
shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim
for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured
more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the
City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment
Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for
any Additional Services required because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of
delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s
regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this section, or to such other
addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the
provisions of this section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City:
Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91750
Matt.Marquez@cityofrc.us
If to Consultant:
Dr. Joe Janczyk, President
Empire Economics, Inc.
35505 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
joe@empireeconomics.com
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the
performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee,
subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
Page 246
Page 12
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer
any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s
obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein,
any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time
Consultant performs the Services.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of
any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a
waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the
making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by
City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of
Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or
prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover
its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material
discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any
document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San
Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement
shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the
party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement
or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each
of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and
integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior
oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be
Page 247
Page 13
amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the
parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Consultant Name: Empire Economics, Inc.
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
Page 248
Page 14
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Page 249
Page 15
Page 250
Page 16
Page 251
Page 17
Page 252
Page 18
Page 253
Page 19
Page 254
Page 20
Attachment A – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
(Sample Only – Not all forms will look identical to this Sample)
Page 255
Page 21
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects
Page 256
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Ulises Benavente, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Securities for Public Improvements Related to Case No. DRC2017-
01011, Located at 6140 Haven Avenue. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
1. Approve the Improvement Agreement for the related public improvements and authorize
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Agreement;
2. Accept security in the form of bonds for completion of the related public improvements;
and
3. Approve the plans and specifications for the related public improvements on file with the
City Engineer.
BACKGROUND:
On November 13, 2019, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2017-01011, a
request to construct and operate a 72-bed residential care facility located at 6140 Haven Avenue,
southwest corner of Haven Avenue & Banyan Street.
Case No. DRC2017-01011 was approved with a condition that certain public improvements be
constructed including storm drain outlet and fiber optic conduit improvements.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant, Haven 6140 RC, LLC, has submitted an Improvement Agreement and securities
to guarantee construction of the off-site public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond No. PB01748500061 $83,700
Labor and Material Bond No. PB01748500061 $83,700
Approval of these items by the City Council would approve the Improvement Agreement and
accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements. Copies of the
Improvement Agreement is on file in the City Clerk’s office.
Page 257
Page 2
3
2
3
4
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption
under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects. There is no
substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s vision to build on our success as a world class community,
to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive through the
construction of high-quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Page 258
ATTACHMENT 1
Case No. DRC2017-01011
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Page 259
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Award of a Professional Services Agreement for
Five-Year On-Call Contract for Acting City Surveyor Services for Fiscal
Years 2025/26 through 2029/30. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
1) Enter into a professional Services Agreement (PSA) with HR Green to provide five (5)
year on-call acting City Surveyor services for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2025/26 through 2029/30
with the option to renew in one (1) year increments not exceeding two (2) years and
authorize the Mayor to sign the PSA on file in the City Clerk’s office; and
2) Authorize the City Engineer to appoint qualified employees of HR Green as acting City
Surveyor and Acting Deputy Surveyor throughout the duration of the contract.
BACKGROUND:
Based on the projected workload and City needs, a new solicitation for on-call acting City Surveyor
services was assembled and distributed to vendors. The City Surveyor provides technical
knowledge and expertise in the field of Land Surveying in support of the City’s engineering
services. Further, the City Surveyor performs certain statutory functions related to review and
approval of survey documents such as subdivision maps and legal descriptions prepared by the
City. These functions require licensure as a Professional Land Surveyor by the State of California.
Further, the City Surveyor provides training and mentorship to staff related the the field of Land
Surveying that will result in better service to community.
Engineering staff provided a detailed Scope of Services to the Procurement Division for the
purposes of establishing a qualified consultant list for a five (5) year on-call contract for acting
City Surveyor services on an as-needed basis for various development plan check projects and
City needs. A formal Request for Qualifications (RFQUAL) #25/26-500 was posted and advertised
in the City’s electronic bidding system.
ANALYSIS:
In total, three (3) proposal responses were received for this on-call RFQUAL. An evaluation
committee was formed and the proposal responses were evaluated and rated in accordance with
the criteria specified in the RFQUAL. The highest ranking firm selected was HR Green. Staff has
Page 260
Page 2
3
2
4
5
determined that they are able to meet the needs of the City based on their qualifications,
experience, scope, and fee schedule. Staff has finalized the proposed PSA with HR Green and
recommends the proposed award for this consultant at this time. Upon execution of the
agreement, the City Engineer will appoint qualified employees of HR Green as the acting City
Surveyor and acting Deputy City Surveyor on behalf of the City.
The selected consultant provided a rate sheet with hourly rates for each position they may use
under the contract. Staff have reviewed the rate sheet provided and found it to be reasonable.
The rate sheet is included in the PSA on file with the City Clerk. The rates are valid for the five (5)
year term of the agreement. Commencing May 15, 2026, and each May 15 thereafter, the
Consultant must notify the City in writing to request an increase in the annual rates for the contract.
The increase in rates will be reviewed and negotiated by City staff, and if approved, take effect
on July 1 of that year. Any rate adjustment will require prior approval by City Council if they exceed
the percentage increase in the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics’
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (“CPI”) for
the twelve-month period ending immediately prior to April 30. However, the rates will not increase
by more than five percent (5%) for any given year without City Council approval even if the CPI
increase exceeds that amount.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The services provided under this agreement will be billed on a time and materials basis per the
rate sheet provided in the PSA. However, costs associated with legal document and map
checking services not related to a City project shall not exceed 60% of the City plan checking
fees. The plan checking fees are generally recaptured through development plan checking fees.
Sufficient appropriation has been included in the FY 2025/26 budget. The total annual cost for
services for the five (5) year on-call period will not exceed $200,000 per year without City Council
approval.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
Engaging with qualified professional service vendors allows the City to intentionally embrace and
anticipate our future by establishing the ability to utilize on-call capacity to achieve the
community’s vision.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 261
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager / Fire Chief
Rick Snawder, Deputy Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design
Services in the Amount of $1,396,774. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Fire Board approve amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services
Agreement, CO# FD 2022-006, with Mary McGrath Architects in the amount of $1,396,774 for
Conceptual Design Services for the rebuild of Amethyst Fire Station 171.
BACKGROUND:
On April 20, 2022, the Fire District and Mary McGrath Architects entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), CO# FD 2022-006, for Conceptual Design Build services for the
rebuild of Fire Station 171, ADA accessibility improvements at Fire Stations 173 and 174, and the
addition of an urban park in front of Fire Station 173.
On August 21, 2024, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 001 with Mary McGrath
Architects for $139,519. The amendment modified the scope of services for Fire Stations 173
and 174 restroom improvements to a design-bid-build process and expanded the scope to include
Fire Station 175 restroom improvements. In addition, the term of the agreement was extended to
April 22, 2027 and the compensation not-to-exceed amount was increased to $585,457.
In order to expedite the rebuild of Amethyst Fire Station 171, the Fire District has determined the
need to shift from a design-build process to a design-bid-build process. This shift will require the
Fire District to have completed construction documents prior to going out to bid on the project.
Mary McGrath Architects has prepared the design-build bridging documents for Amethyst Fire
Station 171. These bridging documents will be used as the basis of design for the project.
ANALYSIS:
Mary McGrath Architects has provided a proposal for full design services for the rebuild of
Amethyst Fire Station 171. This change in scope will shift the station design from a design-build
entity to Mary McGrath Architects, as well as reallocate budgeted funds between phases of the
project. This project will require extensive on and off-site improvements, phasing of the temporary
facilities to be installed prior to the start of the demolition process, and cell sites that will remain
operational during construction. The following scope of work covers design through construction
for both the temporary facilities and station:
Page 262
Page 2
3
2
6
2
Task 1: Conceptual design.
Task 2: Planning application and entitlement process.
Task 3: Design development and updated cost estimate.
Task 4: Construction documents and final cost estimate.
Task 5: Bidding, construction administration, and close out.
Task 6: Temporary Facilities Design.
Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve amendment No. 002 to CO# FD 2022-006 with
Mary McGrath Architects to incorporate the following:
1. The parties will exercise the option to renew and extend Section 2, Term of Agreement,
through April 22, 2029.
2. The parties will modify the scope of services for the rebuild of Amethyst Fire Station
171 by changing the process from a design-build to a design-bid-build process.
3. The parties will amend Section 3.1, Compensation, and increase the total not-to-
exceed amount from $585,457 to a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,908,293.
The new compensation amount includes a credit of $73,938 for the remaining tasks from the
original design-build process, specifically design-build team selection and document review. All
other Terms and Conditions of the original agreement will remain in full effect.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of the amendment is $1,396,774. Funding for the rebuild of Amethyst Fire Station
171 has been approved in the FY 2025-26 budget and sufficient funds are available for this
amendment.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by promoting and
enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement
through the construction of high-quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Scope of Work, Full Design Services for Fire Station 171
Page 263
November 17, 2025
Ms. Darci Vogel
Business Manager
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
RE: Full Design Services for Fire Station No. 171
Dear Ms. Vogel;
It is our pleasure to submit this proposal for the design, construction documents and construction
support for the replacement of Fire Station 171. We appreciate the opportunity to continue our good
working relationship with the Fire District and look forward to reviewing the scope of work prepared for
this new effort. There was much work done by the Fire District staff and MMA in the development of the
bridging documents. This next phase will closely follow those documents to guide the design and
implementation of the construction documents. We will tour Station 178 as we start the design to gain
an insight into what worked well and how the design of Fire Station 171 can benefit from the “lessoned
learned” on that effort.
The replacement of Fire Station 171 is a complex project. There are extensive on and off‐site
improvements; phasing of the temporary facilities to be installed prior to the start of the demolition
process and cell sites to remain operational during construction. The extent of these site improvements
include:
1.Undergrounding of the overhead electrical lines.
2.Relocation of street lighting.
3.Coordination with the City on the implementation of the Fiber‐To‐The Premise installation.
4.Coordination with the City’s Traffic Consultant for the signal pre‐empt at 19th street.
5.The replacement of the street paving to the center line of Amethyst St.
6.Demolition of the station, adjacent office building and removal of fuel storage tanks.
7.Maintain power service and access for the two cell providers on site during the demolition and
construction phase.
8.Prepare the construction documents for the temporary facility concurrent with the station
design so that the temporary facilities can begin construction ahead of the fire station project.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 264
Fortunately, our team has just implemented another fire station project with many of these same off
and on‐site improvements and your project will benefit from that recent experience. We have prepared
a detailed scope of work which encompasses these elements of the project as well as the design of the
fire station with associated site improvements. We look forward to diving into the details of the fire
station design and to creating a station design with you that reflects the residential scope and scale of
the neighborhood and is operationally sound for the firefighters.
The following scope of work is broken down into 5 tasks that follow the course of the design process
and into construction. The 6th task is the design through construction support of the Temporary Fire
Station which will be implemented concurrently with the initial stages of the fire station design. I look
forward to reviewing the scope with your team and getting started on this existing new fire station
project for the Fire District. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mary McGrath, AIA, LEED® AP,
President
Mary McGrath Architects
510.565.0300
mmcgrath@marymcgratharchitects.com
Page 265
Page | 1
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Replacement Fire Station No. 171 Conceptual Design through Close‐out
RCFPD proposes to construct a replacement Fire Station 171 with a new approximately 10,500 SF station.
The project site is located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This is the site of
the existing Fire Station 171. The existing station and site improvements will be demolished as a part of
the project. The entire fire station parcel encompasses approximately 1.0 acres (43,804 SF). Directly to
the north of this site is a property owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Water District lot will
be the location for a Temporary Fire Station. The design, approvals, construction, and removal of this
temporary facility is a part of this project. (Refer to Task 6 for the scope of work for the temporary facility).
The existing fire station project site is adjacent to the USPS directly to the south, with the Cucamonga
Valley Water District owned lot to the north. Across Amethyst Avenue is the Rancho Heritage School and
a Senior Housing Complex. The site is located relatively centrally in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, almost
directly south of the 210 and in the middle of the eastern half of the city limits. In general, the area around
Fire Station 171 consists of residential single‐family homes, with a few higher‐density residential
complexes and smaller‐scale office, shopping, and retail developments/buildings in the vicinity. The goal
of the replacement fire station design is to compliment the residential neighborhood development with
a design that blends with the residential scale of the neighborhood. The previously prepared Bridging
Documents are to be used as a basis of design for this project.
TASK 1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
Task 1A: Conceptual Floor Plans and 3‐D Modeling
Approach
Design Meeting No. 1 ‐ Based on the bridging documents previous prepared for the Fire District, MMA will
develop alternative conceptual building floor plans and massing options for review with the Fire District/City
of Rancho Cucamonga PW Department Design Team (Fire District Design Team). We do recommend that a
member of the planning department also be included as a working member of this Design Team.
The initial working session will evaluate floor plan options (one story and two story) and design massing
options for each plan. The goal of this meeting is to identify successful elements of the plan and massing
options. A selected option (or portions of each option) will be further refined as massing and exterior building
finishes are further developed. Also MMA will present design images for review by the Design Team to further
guide the massing and exterior finish development.
Conceptual design elements addressed at this initial meeting will include:
1. Review of site and floor layouts for further refinements.
2. Review of massing options and building images that can assist the team in determining an approach to
developing the style of the fire station design. The goal is for the station to be residential in design and
seen as a reflection of the residential neighborhood development is this area of the City.
Design Meeting No. 2: This second design meeting will include a presentation of the refined conceptual floor
plan with building massing and exterior material options. MMA will prepare 3‐D models of the design
options to demonstrate the design intent as a part of this process.
Page 266
Page | 2
To support this effort, the electrical, structural, and mechanical engineers will respond to the final plan
developed to provide insight on potential solutions for the main service locations and mechanical equipment
locations to be incorporated in the design. Through input and direction provided at this meeting, the MMA
team will develop a refined final design scheme.
Design Meeting No. 3: This final design meeting will include a presentation of the final refinement of the
conceptual floor plans and building conceptual design. A building model will show refined options for the
exterior material solutions, roof designs, building fenestration, and colors. MMA will refine the 3‐D model of
this final scheme base on Design Team comments.
Deliverables
1. Architectural Conceptual Design – Final Conceptual Floor Plans, Elevations, and 3‐D Model of Building
Design
2. MEP equipment placement within the conceptual floor plans and roof.
Duration
1. 4‐6 weeks
Meetings
1. 4‐5 Design Meetings (Virtual)
Task 1B: On‐site and Off‐site Conceptual Design Development
Approach
The existing fire station and associated storage building are to be removed along with all paving landscape
and site utilities for the creation of the replacement fire station and new site improvements. The existing war
memorial display, plantings and bench along Amethyst Avenue are to be enhanced and integrated into the
new fire station entrance design. The site is to be developed with concrete paving (roadways and walks), site
lighting, an emergency generator with pad/enclosure, storm drain systems, new utilities, solar panel system
on covered parking, landscaping, fencing, and gates. The project landscaping is to be designed to follow the
City's landscape design requirements for drought‐tolerant plant selection and low flow irrigation systems. A
library kiosk may be included in the project site design.
The existing overhead lines between poles #4420766E and #205220 6E will be relocated underground per City
requirements and the project is to be included in the City’s fiber Optic Master Plan. The design of pathways
for the City owned Fiber‐To‐The Premise (FTTP) will be included. A signal pre‐empt is included in the site
design to allow RCFPD to control the traffic signal at 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue upon a response alert.
We will work with the City’s Traffic consultant in the design of this system.
An Opticom control device is to be mounted on a new utility post directly across the street from the apron.
Existing cell towers are to remain and be protected in place. The cell sites are currently powered from an
existing pole mounted transformer at 120/240v single phase to existing meter pedestals. The meter
pedestals are impeding the construction of the new fire station building and will need to be relocated. MMA
will include in the design the re‐route of existing underground conduits feeding the cell tower and provide
new meter pedestal design per SCE requirements. The requirement for temporary power to each cell tower
prior to demolition of overhead lines will be included in the design documents.
Page 267
Page | 3
As a part of the off‐site improvements, the street will be improved to the centerline of the roadway along the
site frontage.
Deliverables
1. Refined Conceptual Architectural Site Design
2. Conceptual on and off‐site utility infrastructure plan, points of connection and site routing for electric,
telephone, City fiber and CATV utility services.
3. Conceptual design for temporary service to Cell sites.
4. Conceptual Signal Pre‐empt Plan
5. Conceptual Civil grading plan.
6. Conceptual Drainage plan.
7. Conceptual wet utilities layout plan.
8. Conceptual Landscape Planting Plan
9. Conceptual Site Photometric Lighting Plan
10. Conceptual Off‐Site Electrical undergrounding Plan
Duration
1. 4‐6 weeks (Concurrent with Building Design)
Meetings
1. 4‐5 Site Design Meetings (Virtual)
TASK 2 PLANNING APPLICATION AND ENTITLEMENT PROCESS
Task 2A: Planning Application and CEQA Process
Approach
The design of the fire station and site improvements is required to comply with Article VIII of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC), known as the Form‐Based Code or FBC. While there is not a specific
function or building type defined under the FBC for a fire station, it is thought that the Neighborhood
General 3 (NG3) is the closest zone classification for this use. While not all criteria within the zone
classification can be met, it is desired that the design meet the intent of the zone classification while
meeting the operational requirements of the fire station use.
During the Conceptual Design Phase, MMA will work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Department to ensure that the project design receives early input from the Planning Department. The
purpose of this review is as a Fire District Design Team Member, and it is to advise if the interpretation of
the zoning code is appropriate as the design proceeds. During this task, the design team will prepare the
planning application and documents necessary for the fire station planning application entitlement
submittal.
It is our understanding that this project may qualify for a mitigated negative declaration as a part of the
CEQA process since it is a replacement station on the same lot as it currently exists. The City Planning Staff
will review and advise if this level of approval is feasible and engage a CEQA consultant to prepare the
CEQA documents and filings.
Deliverables
1. Application and exhibits for the Site Plan Review application including:
a. On‐site Architectural Plan
Page 268
Page | 4
b. Off‐site conceptual Utility plan
c. On and Off‐site Grading and Drainage Plan
d. Landscape Planting Plan
e. Site Lighting Photometric Plan
f. Floor Plans
g. Roof Plans
h. Elevations
i. Building Sections
j. 3‐D images, and;
k. Exterior material color board and photo boards.
Task 2B: Entitlements ‐ Planning Commission Review and City Council Presentations
Approach
MMA will submit the planning documents listed above for planning review. In addition, our team will work
with the City’s Environmental Consultant on the development of the initial study for the project. It is
anticipated to be approved through a negative declaration process and not proceed to an EIR. We are
assuming the Environmental Consultant and any specialty studies such as construction impact, traffic and
noise analysis will be included under the Environmental Document Development Team.
Deliverables
1. Submittal of Application and exhibits for the Planning Review application.
2. Prepare presentation materials for the Planning Commission, and City Council.
3. Preparation of exhibits needed to support the Environmental Review Process
Duration (Task 2A and 2B)
1. 4‐6 months. (Depending on Environmental Processes and Hearing Schedules.)
Meetings
1. One presentation to the Planning Commission
2. One presentation to the City Council
Task 2C – Schematic Design and Cost Estimate
Approach
In this task MMA will further develop the design of the Fire Station No. 171 and associated site area. Based
on the conceptual design approved in Task 1 and the planning application, the MMA team will continue
developing the building systems. We will engage the engineering team to develop schematic level civil,
structural, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical/data drawings. The goal of this phase is to further develop
the building systems so that a Schematic Design Cost Estimate can be completed at the same time as the
project receives it planning approvals. This will confirm the project budget with a more detailed set of
design documents and a more detailed estimate prior to moving forward with construction documents.
Deliverables
1. Schematic level building construction drawings.
2. Schematic level structural, mechanical, electrical, communications design drawings and calculations.
3. Schematic level on and off‐site grading and drainage design.
4. Schematic level on‐site demolition plan.
5. Schematic level on‐site utility plan.
6. Schematic level on‐site erosion control plan.
Page 269
Page | 5
7. Schematic level off‐site utility drawings.
8. Coordinate with City Consultants Schematic level Traffic Pre‐empt drawings.
9. Schematic level specifications (Update from Bridging Documents).
10. Updated Building 3‐D models.
11. Schematic level cost estimate.
12. Documentation of design review and decisions from team meetings.
13. Schedule update.
Meetings
1. 4‐5 meetings with the Fire District Design Team (virtual).
Duration
1. 3 months. (Concurrent with preparation and processing of Planning Application.)
TASK 3.0: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND UPDATED COST ESTIMATE
Approach
The Schematic Design drawing set with budget reconciliation adjustments will be the basis for the
completion of the design development and construction documents. The MMA architectural staff and the
project consultant team will use the information contained in this set of documents to produce the
complete construction plans. It is assumed that the work will be developed under the 2025 building codes
as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to all other applicable codes including the State of
California Essential Service Act requirements, using standard production procedures. The set will include
plans, material specifications, and engineering reports.
The primary intent of the design development phase is to determine the exact size, profile, and character
of the building and site design to form a basis for final construction documents. MMA and the consultant
team will use this phase to further develop the building and site development aspects of the design.
Deliverables
1. Design Development level fire station drawings architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing and
electrical/data.
2. Design Development level on‐site grading and drainage design.
3. Design Development level on‐site utility plans.
4. Design Development level on‐site erosion control plan.
5. Demolition plan, tank removal plan and cell sites temporary electrical service plans.
6. Design Development level Off‐site Improvement Plans (Sidewalks, Aprons, Street lighting, Electrical
Undergrounding, Signal Pre‐empt and City Fiber)
7. Coordinate with City Consultant Design Development Level Signal Pre‐empt plans.
8. Design Development Level Fire Service Connection Plan
9. Coordination with Westnet and response alerting plan.
10. Refinement of Schematic specifications
11. Interior material color board
12. Draft Furnishings listing
13. Updated plumbing, mechanical and electrical cut sheets
14. Design Development level cost estimate.
Meetings
1. 4‐5 meetings with the Fire District Design Team (virtual)
Page 270
Page | 6
a. Design Development Kickoff and 2‐3 meetings with the Fire District Design Team
c. Two meetings with various City departments (Building, Public Works, Engineering and Fire
Prevention)
d. 100% Design Development presentation
Duration
1. 3 months
TASK 4: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND FINAL COST ESTIMATE
Task 4.A 95% Construction Documents, Final Estimate and Permit Ready Documents
Approach
Task 4 will occur in two steps. The first step is the completion of the 95% documents. The 95% documents
will be a substantially complete drawing set except for responses to plan check questions. The 95%
document set will be submitted for plan check and will be the basis for the final cost estimate.
1. 95% Construction Documents (Plan Check Submittal Package)
a. Civil Engineering
i. On‐site Site improvement design and documentation.
ii. Off‐site Street Improvement and Demolition Plans
iii. Fire Service Connection Plan
b. Architectural Site Plan and associated details
c. Landscape and irrigation plan and details.
d. Code Documentation
e. Landscape and irrigation plans and details.
f. Dimensioned layout of final building plans, sections, and elevations
g. Door and window schedules
h. Building detailing
i. Interior finish schedule
j. Interior design including selection of interior materials and colors, final finish boards.
k. Final furnishings listing
2. 95% Design of all engineered systems including:
a. Structural design and calculations
b. Mechanical Design and T‐24 Energy Reports
c. Plumbing layout, design, and fixture schedule
d. Performance criteria for design/build commercial sprinkler system.
e. Electrical engineering systems layout, design, and lighting fixture schedule, Electrical/Data
Site layout and engineering. Lighting T‐24 Reports
f. Phone, data, audio visual and security layout, and design to head‐in equipment.
g. Coordination with Westnet for speaker and alerting systems device layouts and equipment
locations.
h. Radio system infrastructure design based on input provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
District. Radio head‐in equipment and antenna design by District.
3. 95% Off‐site Utility Improvements including:
a. Electrical Undergrounding and City Fiber Undergrounding (Coordinate with Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Utility RCMU) for conduit, boxes, and transformer locations).
b. Traffic Signal Pre‐empt Plan (Coordinate with City Consultant for conduit, boxes, and signal
locations).
Page 271
Page | 7
c. Coordinate with City Agency for conduit and boxes necessary for Street Lighting Replacement
4. Plan Check Applications
5. 95% Specifications
Task 4.B 100% Construction Documents
Approach
The second step of this task is the response to plan check comments and preparing the 100% construction
documents for bid. These 100% documents set will be permit ready and be the bid set.
Task 4.2 Deliverables
1. Plan check Response and Revised Recheck Documents
2. 100% Construction Documents (Bid documents)
3. 100% Off‐site Utility Improvements Drawings
4. 100% complete specifications
5. LID Observation and Final Grading Forms
6. Complete equipment and material cut sheets.
7. Final Engineering calculations and Title 24 energy documentation
8. Review Draft Division 0 documents prepared by the Fire District. Coordinate with Division 1
documents prepared by MMA.
Meetings
1. Multiple (2‐3) meetings to review progress. (virtual)
TASK 5: BIDDING, CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND CLOSE OUT
Task 5.A Bidding
Approach
It is assumed that the project will be publicly bid by prequalified contractors and major subcontractors.
Our team will assist the District in preparing the documents fo r bid. The documents will be advertised and
submitted to plan rooms for bidding by the Fire District. There will be a pre‐bidding conference which the
CM will conduct and lead. We will respond to questions during bidding, prepare written clarifications and
addenda.
Deliverables
1. Review Pre‐ Conference Agenda and meeting notes prepared by the CM (Retained by the District)
2. Written response to questions
3. Preparation addenda listings and exhibits
Task 5.B Construction Administration
Approach
We anticipate an 18‐month construction period. We will participate in weekly construction meetings via
conference call. MMA’s project architect and supporting office staff will provide support to the field
through our response to RFI’s, submittal review, substitution review and change order requests. The
engineering team will perform site observations 2‐3 times during the construction phase at critical phases
for their discipline.
Page 272
Page | 8
Deliverables and Meetings
1. Attend pre‐construction meeting (virtual)
2. Attend weekly construction progress meetings (virtual)
3. Review and respond to RFI’s
4. Review and respond to Change Requests
5. Construction progress review by MMA Design Team (2‐3 site visits per discipline)
6. Submittal / shop drawing processing and review
7. Clarifications / field questions processing and response
Task 5.C: Close‐out
Approach
MMA and the consultant team will perform a walk through to determine Substantial Completion of the
building and site construction phase of the work and prepare a final punch list. We will then provide a
final walk through to verify that the punch list items have been completed. Our tasks in the phase will
include review of close‐out documents for accuracy and completeness. They include Operations and
Maintenance Manuals, Warrantees and Guarantees and evidence of extra stock delivery. We will gather
record drawings prepared by the contractor and update the bid documents in a digital format for the Fire
District’s use.
Deliverables
1. Punch List at Substantial Completion
2. Review and written comments on close out documents including O&M manuals and
warranties/guarantees.
3. Review Digital Record Drawings (Review of Contractor Prepared Record Documents (PDF’s).
Meetings
1. Punch List walk through at Substantial Completion
2. Final review of completed punch list to be observed by the CM.
TASK 6: TEMPORARY FACILITIES DESIGN
Task 6. A Site Design and Performance Based Temporary Structure Design
Approach
The temporary facilities will be placed adjacent to the fire station site on a property owned by the Rancho
Cucamonga Water District. The living quarters will be developed using a modular building system and a
sprung structure will be used for the apparatus bay and fitness room. The site design and modular
structures will be submitted for planning approval based on the existing concept drawings included in the
bridging documents.
Both that modular building and the sprung structure will be defined by a performance specification and a
conceptual layout. Foundation design for each of the structures will be completed by the MMA Structural
Engineer. Each of these facilities are to be designed (except foundations), permitted, and installed by the
manufacture.
The site design will be developed per similar standards to the fire station site. The MMA team will work
with the Fire District Design Team and the RC Water District to define what site improvements are to
remain when the temporary structures are removed.
Page 273
Page | 9
Site utilities will be extended from the existing fire station site where feasible. It is assumed that the
temporary facilities will be bid separately from the main contract as a stand‐alone project. These
documents will be prepared when the schematic design work for the site station is underway. The site
construction documents will be submitted to the City for plan check. It is a goal to have this project under
construction and completed before the main fire station project is awarded for construction.
This scope of work includes bid support, review of performance‐based documentation prepared by the
Contractor and weekly CA meetings (virtual) during the installation of the temporary facilities.
Deliverables
1. Architectural Site Plan
2. Site Grading and Drainage plans
3. Site utility plans
4. Performance specification and conceptual layout for temporary structures.
5. Foundations design (based on manufacturer's requirements)
6. Front End Bid document coordination with the Fire District
7. CA support during construction
Work Scope Qualifications and Exclusions:
Products and services to be provided by the others:
1. Design of Traffic Signal Pre‐empt (Except coordination with City Consultant)
2. Preparation of CEQA Documentation
3. Geotechnical and Geohazards Studies
4. Commissioning Services
5. Surveying
6. Fire alerting system design (except coordination with Westnet for conduit and equipment location
requirements)
7. Hearings, submittals, or negotiations with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department
beyond those listed above.
8. Summary of facility maintenance and operation cost
9. Physical Presentation Models
10. Head‐in equipment design and procurement for phone, data, security, audio visual and radio systems
(except coordination with City Consultants for conduit and equipment location requirements).
11. Specialized energy analysis of the facility design beyond those required for CALGREEN.
12. Off‐site observation of construction materials and assemblies
13. Furnishings Procurement and installation coordination.
14. Construction Management Services
15. Hazardous Materials Studies and Hazmat Services during tank removal.
Page 274
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Fire Station 171
Proposed
Hours Per Task/Rates Summary
Task 1A
Conceptual Floor Plan
and 3d Modeling
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 40 80 40 0 0
Total Amount $8,200 $0 $13,200 $5,800 $0 $0 $27,200
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $5,500 $0 $3,729 $2,735 $0 $0 $11,964
Task 1A $39,164
Task 1B On-site and Off-Site
Conceptual Design
Development
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 20 0 60 0 60 0
Total Amount $4,100 $0 $9,900 $0 $7,500 $0 $21,500
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $0 $4,785 $0 $7,955 $7,920 $0 $20,660
Task 1B $42,160
Task 2A Planning Application
and CEQA Process
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 40 0 80 80 00
Total Amount $8,200 $0 $13,200 $11,600 $0 $0 $33,000
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $0 $0 $0 $1,989 $0 $1,989
Task 2A $33,000
Task 2B Planning Commission
Review and City Council
Presentation
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 40 0 20 12 00
Total Amount $8,200 $0 $3,300 $1,740 $0 $0 $13,240
Task 2B $15,229
Task 2C Schematic Design and
Cost Estimate
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 40 80 120 160 80 20
Total Amount $8,200 $14,400 $19,800 $23,200 $10,000 $2,500 $78,100
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $28,600 $23,100 $11,187 $2,812 $0 $15,098 $80,796
Task 2C $158,896
Page 1 of 3
Page 275
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Fire Station 171
Proposed
Hours Per Task/Rates Summary
Task 3 Design Development
and Updated Cost
Estimate
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 80 40 320 320 240 240
Total Amount $16,400 $7,200 $52,800 $46,400 $30,000 $30,000 $182,800
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $41,800 $31,240 $18,645 $4,985 $9,350 $17,820 $123,840
Task 3 $306,640
Task 4A 95% Construction
Documents, Final
Estimate and Plan
Check Submittal
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 80 40 320 320 240 80
Total Amount $16,400 $7,200 $52,800 $46,400 $30,000 $10,000 $162,800
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $55,000 $44,000 $19,800 $2,983 $15,400 $13,734 $150,917
Task 4A $313,717
Task 4B 100% Cd's - Permit
Ready
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 32 0 60 60 00
Total Amount $6,560 $0 $9,900 $8,700 $0 $0 $25,160
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $19,800 $2,200 $2,574 $4,858 $1,100 $0 $30,532
Task 4B $55,692
Task 5A Bidding Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 40 0 20 80 00
Total Amount $8,200 $0 $3,300 $11,600 $0 $0 $23,100
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $2,750 $495 $1,492 $994 $550 $0 $6,281
Task 5A $29,381
Task 5B Construction
Administration
Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 20 240 240 240 00
Total Amount $4,100 $43,200 $39,600 $34,800 $0 $0 $121,700
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $44,000 $15,400 $14,916 $8,452 $11,550 $0 $94,318
Task 5B $216,018
Page 2 of 3
Page 276
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Fire Station 171
Proposed
Hours Per Task/Rates Summary
Task 5C Close Out Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 20 0 40 40 00
Total Amount $4,100 $0 $6,600 $5,800 $0 $0 $16,500
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $2,750 $1,100 $2,237 $1,989 $550 $0 $8,626
Task 5C $25,126
Task 6 Temporary Facilities Mary
McGrath
Architects PIC
PM/SR.
Arch
Architect/
Designer
Intermediate
Arch/Design Job Captain Technical Totals
rate $205 $180 $165 $145 $125 $125
hours 8 0 80 120 120 80
Total Amount $1,640 $0 $13,200 $17,400 $15,000 $10,000 $57,240
Consultant
CSEG
Structural
Thoma
Electrical 3C Eng. M/P
Ashba Civil
Engineers
Cunningham
Landscape
OCMI, Inc-
Cost Estimator Totals
Total Amount $22,000 $13,750 $11,000 $11,436 $0 $5,643 $63,829
Task 6 $121,069
Total Lump Sum Fees:
Task 1A Conceptual Floor Plan and 3d Modeling $39,164
Task 1B On-site and Off-Site Conceptual Design Development $42,160
Task 1 Total: $81,324
Task 2A Planning Application and CEQA Process $33,000
Task 2B Planning Commission Review and City Council Presentation $15,229
Task 2C Schematic Design and Cost Estimate $158,896
Task 2 Total: $207,125
Task 3 Design Development and Updated Cost Estimate Task 3 total: $306,640
Task 4A 95% Construction Documents, Final Estimate and Plan Check Submittal $313,717
Task 4B 100% Cd's - Permit Ready $55,692
Task 4 total: $369,408
Task 5A Bidding $29,381
Task 5B Construction Administration $216,018
Task 5C Close Out $25,126
Task 5 total: $270,526
Task 6 Temporary Facilities Task 6 Total: $121,069
Total Lump Sum Fee: $1,356,091
Reimbursable Expenses: $40,683
$1,396,774
Reimbursable expenses would include travel, printing, report publishing and rendering costs.
Page 3 of 3
Page 277
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager / Fire Chief
Rick Snawder, Deputy Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station
178 Facility as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Release of
Retention. (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the City Council / Fire Board:
1. Accept the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park at Fire Station 178, Contract No. CO FD 2021-
011, as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $21,020,211.88;
3. Authorize the Fire Chief to file a Notice of Completion and release remaining retention in
the amount of $650,675.25, 35 days after acceptance. The net amount of retention to be
released shall be reduced by any stop notices, back charges, credits, liens, and/or
assessments that have already been received by the Fire District or are received within
35 days of acceptance of the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park, until resolution of those
actions;
4. Authorize the Fire Chief to approve the release of the Labor and Materials Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if no claims have been received; and
5. Authorize the Fire Chief to approve the release of the Faithful Performance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On February 17, 2016, the Fire Board approved the purchase of 3.8 acres of property located at
the corner of Town Center Drive and Terra Vista Parkway for future Fire Station 178. This property
is centrally located in an area of the City planned for high-density residential and large-scale office
building developments. This strategic location will help maximize existing resources to better
serve the central community while providing for system wide draw-down and corresponding
demands for service.
On August 5, 2020, the Fire Board approved a contract amendment with Mary McGrath Architects
for Conceptual Design Build services of the new Fire Station 178. The conceptual design for the
station is a 12,176 square foot, two-story fire station that will house three (3) on-duty firefighters
24 hours per day. The station is designed to accommodate up to seven (7) on-duty personnel in
order to address potential future changes in response and staffing needs.
On September 1, 2021, the Fire Board awarded contract FD 2021-011 to AMG & Associates, Inc.
for design-build of Fire Station 178, to include both Additive Alternate No. 1 (Records Storage
Building) and No. 2 (Solar/Battery Storage System). The total contract awarded was $16,389,052
Page 278
Page 2
3
2
1
0
(including an allowance of $630,348 for design-build and additive alternates) and an additional
project contingency of $945,522 (totaling 10% for allowances and contingency). Construction of
Fire Station 178 utilizes the design-build process, the first time for both the City and the District.
This progressive process involves a general contractor and licensed architect partnering to form
a design-build team and then working collaboratively under a single contract to provide design
and construction services. This process allows for a unified flow of work, greater flexibility in
awarding a contract, higher quality work, and greater cost certainty with fewer change orders and
delays.
During a study session on September 1, 2021, the Fire Board also considered options for
construction of a 9/11 Memorial using steel remnants obtained from the South Tower of the World
Trade Center. During the study session, the Fire Board directed staff to move forward with
incorporating the 9/11 Memorial at the Fire Station 178 site. The Fire Board authorized a total of
$1,000,000 in funding, split $700,000 for the Fire District and $300,000 for the City.
On October 20, 2021, Mary McGrath Architects’ contract for Conceptual Design Build services of
Fire Station 178 was amended to include the design and layout of the 9/11 Memorial, as well as
creation of the Basis of Design documents and coordination with the Design-Build contractor’s
team. The Basis of Design documents were prepared at a concept level of design and included
written performance requirements. The intent of these documents was to allow AMG &
Associates’ team to provide a high-level order of magnitude cost proposal for the park addition
and ultimately, complete the construction documents and construct the 9/11 Memorial.
The Basis of Design documents were provided to AMG & Associates’ team in May 2022 for review
and pricing. However, due to the intricacies of the project and the various elements included in
the design, pricing was difficult to determine due to the design having only been prepared at the
concept level. The initial pricing was received in July 2022; however, construction numbers came
in higher than expected due to rising construction costs and a number of unknowns with the
project. District staff worked with AMG & Associates and Mary McGrath Architects to identify
options for value engineering in order to reduce costs. Ultimately, it was determined that the best
way to get accurate, competitive pricing for the project was to move forward with schematic
design, design development, and completion of construction documents.
On November 2, 2022, AMG & Associates, Inc. contract for design-build of Fire Station 178 was
amended to include preconstruction services for the 9/11 Memorial. The change order included
schematic design, design development, and completion of construction documents for the 9/11
Memorial. Once preconstruction services were complete, the Fire Board would be able to
determine if and when to proceed with the next phase of the 9/11 Memorial.
During this time, the Fire District and City began exploring funding mechanisms for the 9/11
Memorial, including the community fundraising campaign “$8 to Station 178” and State Earmark
Requests. In January 2023, the City submitted a State Earmark Request to Assembly Majority
Leader Emeritus Eloise Gomez Reyes for $3.2 million for the 9/11 Memorial. The State approved
the funding request and distributed it as a grant, administered by the California Natural Resources
Agency. On February 6, 2024, the Fire Board / City Council approved a resolution accepting the
grant funds, authorizing submittal of the required project information package, and authorizing the
Fire Chief to execute and submit all project forms, agreements, and payment requests.
On May 20, 2024, the 9/11 Memorial Grant Agreement was executed, thus providing the funding
necessary to move forward with the 9/11 Memorial at Fire Station 178. In addition, the Fire Board’s
prior authorization of $1,000,000 in funding and community fundraising of approximately $88,740,
Page 279
Page 3
3
2
1
0
have established a total budget of $4,288,740 for the 9/11 Memorial. This budget includes any
associated expenses, including preconstruction, construction, project management, third party
consultants, project contingency, etc.
On June 5, 2024, AMG & Associates, Inc. contract was amended to include construction of the
9/11 Memorial at Fire Station 178. The change order was in the amount of $3,182,141, plus an
Additive Alternate for concrete walkways in the amount of $188,555, for a total cost proposal of
$3,370,696.
On May 25, 2024, Fire personnel moved into Fire Station 178 in order to begin providing needed
services to the community. AMG and Associates, Inc. continued to work on project completion
and punch list items, including landscaping, lighting, solar/battery storage system, and the 9/11
Memorial.
On March 5, 2025, the Fire Board accepted the fire station facility as complete, authorized the
Fire Chief to file a partial Notice of Completion, and authorized a partial release of the retention
for the fire station facility in the amount of $400,335.34. Final project close out, acceptance,
release of the remaining retention, and release of bonds was recommended to take place once
the 9/11 Memorial portion of the project was completed.
On September 11, 2025, the City held a ribbon cutting for the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park and
the park was opened to the community. AMG and Associates, Inc. continued to work on project
completion and punch list items.
ANALYSIS:
The Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park has been completed in accordance with the approved plans
and specifications, as well as to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. Staff recommends that the Fire
Board accept the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park as complete, authorize the Fire Chief to file a final
Notice of Completion, and release of the remaining project retention in the amount of
$650,675.25, 35 days after acceptance of the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park. The net amount of
retention to be released shall be reduced by any stop notices, back charges, credits, liens, and/or
assessments that have already been received by the Fire District or are received within 35 days
of acceptance of the fire station facility until resolution.
Staff also recommends the Fire Board authorize the Fire Chief to approve the release of the Labor
and Materials Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if no claims have
been received; and release the Faithful Performance Bond one year following the filing of the
Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final amount for Contract No. CO FD 2021-011 with AMG & Associates, Inc. for the
construction of Fire Station 178 and the Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park project is $21,020,211.88.
Adequate funds are budgeted for the project in the Fire Capital Fund (F288), City Capital Reserve
Fund (F025), and State Grant Fund (F274). Unused project funds will return to fund balance.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The completion of Fire Station 178 will promote a safe and healthy community for all by enhancing
the delivery of vital life safety services and ensuring efficient response times to residents, visitors,
and businesses.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Notice of Completion (final)
Page 280
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
On Behalf Of: Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt. Cod. Sec. 27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real
property, the nature of which interest or estate is:
All public rights-of-way within the boundaries of Contract No. CO FD 2021-011
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, P. O. BOX 807, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA 91730.
3. On December 17, 2025, there was completed in the hereinafter described real
property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for:
Contract No. CO FD 2021-011
Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park (at Fire Station 178)
APN 1077-423-01-0-000
4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was:
AMG and Associates, Inc.
5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows:
10597 Town Center Drive, Spagnolo 9/11 Memorial Park
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT, a Special District, Owner
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
DATE
Executed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California
Mike McCliman
Fire Chief, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 281
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Lelani B. Gnaster, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and
Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Haven Avenue
Overcrossing Fencing Project (Project). This Project is Exempt from the
Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per
Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
1. Accept the Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project, Contract No. 2025-100 (Project),
as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $57,480;
3. Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of
Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bonds in the amount of $57,480 six (6)
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release the Project retention,
35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1) year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On August 20, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Gentry General
Engineering, Inc. (Gentry General), in the amount of $57,480 plus 10% contingency in the amount
of $5,750 for the construction of the Project. A copy of the August 20, 2025, City Council Staff
Report is on file with the City Clerk. The scope of work included the installation of access deterrent
fencing at the four corner locations of the bridge on the existing pedestrian fencing. A vicinity map
illustrating the limits of the project is included as Attachment 1.
Page 282
Page 2
3
2
0
0
ANALYSIS:
The Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. There were no change orders and no balancing statement
on the Project.
At the end of the one (1) year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects
in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval
by the City Engineer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The construction completed under the above-reference contract was determined to be exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Government Code Section
15301(c) “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 – Existing Facilities. A Notice of Exemption
was filed with the County of San Bernardino on October 25, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $75,200 was appropriated for construction of this Project from the Infrastructure Fund
(198). The total funds for the construction phase of the Project were identified under the Capital
Improvement Project account number listed below:
Account No. Funding Source Amount
F198 CC307 SC7004
PID2174-198
Infrastructure Fund (198) $75,200
Total Project Funding $75,200
The final project costs is $60,165 as shown below:
Expenditure Amount
Construction Contract $57,480
Construction Inspection Services $1,120
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,565
Estimated Contract Costs $60,165
A total of $15,035 remains in the budget for this Project and will be returned to the Infrastructure
Fund (198) balance to be used for applicable expenses or future capital improvement projects as
appropriate.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all by providing continue improvement through the construction of high-quality
public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 283
Haven Avenue Overcrossing Fencing Project Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Project Location:
Page 284
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services
Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director
Emily Nielsen, Senior Human Resources Business Partner
SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt Resolutions Updating the Fiscal Year 2025-2026
City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Salary Schedules.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2025-100 AND RESOLUTION FD 2025-029)
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council/Fire Board adopt resolutions updating the Fiscal Year 2025/26
City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District salary schedules.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council/Fire Board traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for classifications
employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of
classifications, changes in job titles, and other terms of employment.
The City Council/Fire Board previously approved the existing Memorandums of Understanding
(MOU) between the City and each of its bargaining units including the Executive Management
Employees Group (Executive Management), Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
(RCMA), Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA), Teamsters Local 1932
(Teamsters), Fire Management Employees Group (Fire MEG), Firefighters Local 2274 (Fire
Union), and Fire Support Services Association (Fire Support). These MOUs are currently in effect
and provide for equity adjustments as outlined below.
Effective, January 1, 2026, the State of California minimum wage will increase from $16.50 per
hour to $16.90 per hour. As a result of the minimum wage increase, several positions on the part-
time salary schedule will be adjusted to reflect this change. Additionally, those salary ranges for
part-time positions with a full-time equivalent classification will be updated to reflect the full-time
salary range.
ANALYSIS:
Effective January 12, 2026, changes to the Executive Management salary schedule include the
following:
A 2% cost of living adjustment (COLA) for all job classifications.
Adjustments to the minimum and maximum of the salary ranges for all job classifications
Page 285
Page 2
3
2
6
7
to align with market averages as listed in the MOU.
Updating the title of Engineering Services Director/City Engineer to Engineering Services
Director.
Effective January 12, 2026, changes to the RCMA salary schedule include the following:
A 2% cost of living adjustment (COLA) for all job classifications.
Adjustments to the minimum and maximum of the salary ranges to align with market
averages and to address compact for those job classifications listed in the MOU.
Updating the title of Deputy Director of Engineering/Utility Manager to Deputy Director of
Electric Utility Services.
Effective January 12, 2026, changes to the RCCEA salary schedule include the following:
Adjustments to the minimum and maximum of the salary ranges to align with market
averages and to address compact for those job classifications listed in the MOU.
Updating the title of Parking & Business License Supervisor to Parking Supervisor.
Effective January 5, 2026 changes to the Fire MEG salary schedule include the following:
A 1% equity adjustment to the Fire Chief classification, a 4% equity adjustment to the Fire
Deputy Chief classification and a 2% equity adjustment to the Fire Battalion Chief
classification.
Effective January 5, 2026, job classifications with the Fire Union bargaining unit will receive a
2.5% equity adjustment.
In order to comply with the State of California minimum wage law, the attached resolution includes
updates to the 2026 City and Fire District part-time salary schedules increasing those steps below
the minimum wage.
Updates to the Part-Time City and Part-Time Fire District salary schedule include increasing steps
below the minimum wage to $16.90 per hour, effective January 1, 2026. Additionally, those salary
ranges for part-time positions with a full-time equivalent classification will be updated to reflect
the full-time salary range.
The attached resolutions adopt the changes as outlined above.
All other salary schedules, classifications, job titles, and other terms of employment remain the
same.
Staff recommends the City Council/Fire Board approve the resolutions updating the City and
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District salary schedules for the 2025/26 fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost changes of the minimum wage increase and matching part-time salaries to their full-time
equivalent could result in a $49,200 increase to part-time and full-time salaries in the fiscal year.
This would be included in the budget for FY 2025/26.
All other adjustments to the salary schedules and their fiscal impacts were accounted for in the
FY 2025/26 Adopted Budget.
Page 286
Page 2
3
2
6
7
Page 287
Page 3
3
2
6
7
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City’s vision to build on our success as a world-class community, and
create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution 2025-100 - City Salary Schedules
Attachment 2 – Resolution FD 2025-029 - Fire District Salary Schedules
Page 288
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATING
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 SALARY SCHEDULES.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is
necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established
prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted
salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for
employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is
necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position
titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined the use of an existing salary
range on a City full-time bargaining unit salary schedule for a part-time position when a full-time
equivalent is not listed in the City’s part-time salary schedule; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules for job classifications employed
by the City (Exhibit A).
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ___________, 2025.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 289
RCCEA Covered Employees in the
Supervisory/Professional and General Employee Groups
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Classification Min
Amount
CP
Amount2
MAX
Amount
Account Clerk $3,790.00 $4,599.90 $5,111.00
Account Technician $4,485.00 $5,445.90 $6,051.00
Accountant#$5,827.00 $7,073.10 $7,859.00
Accounts Payable Supervisor#$5,961.00 $7,236.90 $8,041.00
Administrative Assistant $3,660.00 $4,445.10 $4,939.00
Animal Behavior Specialist $3,612.00 $4,385.70 $4,873.00
Animal Care Attendant $2,976.00 $3,610.80 $4,012.00
Animal Care Supervisor#$5,490.00 $6,663.60 $7,404.00
Animal Caretaker $3,438.00 $4,171.50 $4,635.00
Animal Rescue Specialist $3,612.00 $4,385.70 $4,873.00
Animal Services Dispatcher $3,285.00 $3,990.60 $4,434.00
Animal Services Officer I $4,259.00 $5,170.50 $5,745.00
Animal Services Officer II $4,705.00 $5,713.20 $6,348.00
Artistic Producer - Mainstreet Theatre
Company
$4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Assistant Engineer#$6,812.00 $8,271.00 $9,190.00
Assistant Planner#$5,751.00 $6,981.30 $7,757.00
Associate Engineer#$7,913.00 $9,605.70 $10,673.00
Associate Planner#$6,319.00 $7,668.90 $8,521.00
Box Office Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Budget Analyst#$7,345.00 $8,914.50 $9,905.00
Building Inspection Supervisor#2 $6,739.00 $8,182.80 $9,092.00
Building Inspector I2 $5,274.00 $6,402.60 $7,114.00
Building Inspector II2 $5,827.00 $7,074.90 $7,861.00
Business License Clerk $3,846.00 $4,667.40 $5,186.00
Business License Inspector $4,633.00 $5,625.00 $6,250.00
Business License Program Coordinator $4,461.00 $5,412.60 $6,014.00
Business License Program Supervisor#$5,961.00 $7,236.90 $8,041.00
Business License Technician $4,155.00 $5,043.60 $5,604.00
City Clerk Records Management Analyst#$5,869.00 $7,124.40 $7,916.00
Community Affairs Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Community Affairs Officer#$7,345.00 $8,914.50 $9,905.00
Community Affairs Senior Coordinator#$5,979.00 $7,260.30 $8,067.00
Community Affairs Specialist $2,961.00 $3,596.40 $3,996.00
Community Affairs Technician $4,574.00 $5,549.40 $6,166.00
Community Development Technician I $4,257.00 $5,170.50 $5,745.00
Community Development Technician II $4,477.00 $5,435.10 $6,039.00
Community Improvement Officer I $4,641.00 $5,634.00 $6,260.00
1
Exhibit A
Page 290
RCCEA Covered Employees in the
Supervisory/Professional and General Employee Groups
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Community Improvement Officer II $5,127.00 $6,224.40 $6,916.00
Community Improvement Supervisor#2 $6,739.00 $8,182.80 $9,092.00
Community Programs Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Community Programs Specialist $4,574.00 $5,549.40 $6,166.00
Community Services Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Community Services Project Coordinator#$6,258.00 $7,596.90 $8,441.00
Community Services Specialist $2,961.00 $3,596.40 $3,996.00
Community Services Supervisor#$5,979.00 $7,260.30 $8,067.00
Community Services Technician $4,803.00 $5,827.50 $6,475.00
Community Theater Producer $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Customer Care Assistant $3,660.00 $4,445.10 $4,939.00
Customer Service Representative $3,829.00 $4,647.60 $5,164.00
Customer Service Specialist I - Utilities $4,257.00 $5,170.50 $5,745.00
Customer Service Specialist II - Utilities $4,477.00 $5,435.10 $6,039.00
Customer Service Specialist III - Utilities $4,946.00 $6,003.90 $6,671.00
Engineering Aide $4,786.00 $5,810.40 $6,456.00
Engineering Technician $5,557.00 $6,746.40 $7,496.00
Environmental Programs Coordinator#$6,838.00 $8,301.60 $9,224.00
Environmental Programs Inspector2 $5,827.00 $7,074.90 $7,861.00
Event & Rental Services Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Executive Assistant II#$5,128.00 $6,224.40 $6,916.00
Executive Assistant1 $3,969.00 $5,592.60 $6,214.00
Fleet Supervisor#2 $6,453.00 $7,838.10 $8,709.00
Front of House Coordinator $4,879.00 $5,921.10 $6,579.00
Fund Development Coordinator#$5,390.00 $6,543.00 $7,270.00
GIS Analyst#$6,990.00 $8,480.70 $9,423.00
GIS Specialist $5,319.00 $6,455.70 $7,173.00
GIS Supervisor#$7,868.00 $9,549.90 $10,611.00
GIS Technician $5,155.00 $6,261.30 $6,957.00
Human Resources Business Partner#$5,869.00 $7,124.40 $7,916.00
Human Resources Clerk $4,016.00 $4,873.50 $5,415.00
Human Resources Technician $4,685.00 $5,688.00 $6,320.00
Information Technology Analyst I#$6,675.00 $8,099.10 $8,999.00
Information Technology Analyst II#$7,192.00 $8,727.30 $9,697.00
Information Technology Specialist I $5,319.00 $6,455.70 $7,173.00
Information Technology Specialist II $5,732.00 $6,957.00 $7,730.00
Information Tech Operations Supvr.#$7,868.00 $9,549.90 $10,611.00
Information Technology Technician $4,216.00 $5,119.20 $5,688.00
Lead Park Ranger $4,641.00 $5,634.00 $6,260.00
Lead Veterinary Assistant $4,369.00 $5,301.90 $5,891.00
2
Page 291
RCCEA Covered Employees in the
Supervisory/Professional and General Employee Groups
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Librarian I $5,087.00 $6,174.00 $6,860.00
Librarian II#$5,698.00 $6,915.60 $7,684.00
Library Assistant I $3,730.00 $4,531.50 $5,035.00
Library Assistant II $4,304.00 $5,223.60 $5,804.00
Library Clerk $3,326.00 $4,035.60 $4,484.00
Library Technician $3,854.00 $4,679.10 $5,199.00
Maintenance Supervisor#2 $6,453.00 $7,838.10 $8,709.00
Management Aide $5,054.00 $6,132.60 $6,814.00
Management Analyst I#$5,869.00 $7,124.40 $7,916.00
Management Analyst II#$6,748.00 $8,191.80 $9,102.00
Management Analyst III#$7,345.00 $8,914.50 $9,905.00
Office Services Clerk $3,660.00 $4,445.10 $4,939.00
Patron & Events Supervisor#$5,979.00 $7,260.30 $8,067.00
Parking Supervisor#$6,706.00 $8,143.20 $9,048.00
Payroll Supervisor#$5,961.00 $7,236.90 $8,041.00
Planning Specialist $4,946.00 $6,003.90 $6,671.00
Planning Technician $4,477.00 $5,435.10 $6,039.00
Plans Examiner I $6,280.00 $7,623.90 $8,471.00
Plans Examiner II#$6,732.00 $8,176.50 $9,085.00
Procurement Business Partner $4,372.00 $5,309.10 $5,899.00
Procurement Clerk $3,754.00 $4,557.60 $5,064.00
Public Services Technician I $4,257.00 $5,170.50 $5,745.00
Public Services Technician II $4,477.00 $5,435.10 $6,039.00
Public Services Technician III $4,946.00 $6,003.90 $6,671.00
Public Works Inspector I2 $5,274.00 $6,402.60 $7,114.00
Public Works Inspector II2 $5,827.00 $7,074.90 $7,861.00
Records Clerk $3,464.00 $4,206.60 $4,674.00
Records Coordinator $3,543.00 $4,303.80 $4,782.00
Risk Management Coordinator#$5,869.00 $7,124.40 $7,916.00
Safety Officer#$7,345.00 $8,914.50 $9,905.00
Senior Account Clerk $4,186.00 $5,081.40 $5,646.00
Senior Account Technician $5,031.00 $6,107.40 $6,786.00
Senior Accountant#$6,854.00 $8,320.50 $9,245.00
Senior Animal Care Supervisor#$5,688.00 $6,906.60 $7,674.00
Senior Animal Services Officer#$5,664.00 $6,877.80 $7,642.00
Senior Building Inspector#2 $6,437.00 $7,816.50 $8,685.00
Senior Business License Clerk $4,249.00 $5,157.90 $5,731.00
Senior Community Improvement Officer#$5,675.00 $6,888.60 $7,654.00
Senior Electrician #$6,361.00 $7,721.10 $8,579.00
Sr Environmental Compliance Inspector $6,100.00 $7,441.20 $8,268.00
3
Page 292
RCCEA Covered Employees in the
Supervisory/Professional and General Employee Groups
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Senior GIS Analyst #$7,531.00 $9,138.60 $10,154.00
Sr Human Resources Business Partner#$6,748.00 $8,191.80 $9,102.00
Senior Information Technology Analyst#$8,136.00 $9,874.80 $10,972.00
Senior Information Technology Specialist#$6,397.00 $7,764.30 $8,627.00
Senior Librarian#$6,126.00 $7,432.20 $8,258.00
Senior Park Planner#$6,740.00 $8,181.90 $9,091.00
Senior Parking Enforcement Officer#$5,609.00 $6,810.30 $7,567.00
Senior Plans Examiner#$7,671.00 $9,314.10 $10,349.00
Senior Procurement Technician#$5,469.00 $6,637.50 $7,375.00
Senior Public Services Technician#$5,469.00 $6,637.50 $7,375.00
Senior Risk Management Analyst#$7,345.00 $8,914.50 $9,905.00
Senior Veterinary Technician#$5,664.00 $6,877.80 $7,642.00
Special Districts Analyst#$6,748.00 $8,191.80 $9,102.00
Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 $6,768.00 $8,216.10 $9,129.00
Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist#2 $6,922.00 $8,403.30 $9,337.00
Theater Production Coordinator $5,128.00 $6,224.40 $6,916.00
Theater Production Supervisor#$5,979.00 $7,260.30 $8,067.00
Theatre Technician III $4,477.00 $5,435.10 $6,039.00
Utilities Operation Supervisor#$7,120.00 $8,641.80 $9,602.00
Utility Marker $5,929.00 $7,199.10 $7,999.00
Veterinary Assistant $3,971.00 $4,820.40 $5,356.00
Veterinary Technician $4,803.00 $5,827.50 $6,475.00
1. When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting.
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class. Per City Policy, Exempt positions will be
hired at a minimum of $5,858 per month.
2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance.
4
Page 293
Rancho Cucamnga Management Association
Assignments of Classification to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Classification MIN Amount CP Amount MAX Amount
Accounting Manager $7,367 $8,942 $9,935
Animal Center Manager $6,702 $8,134 $9,038
Assistant to the City Manager $9,951 $12,080 $13,422
Building & Safety Manager $8,928 $11,054 $12,282
Chief Information Security Officer $8,398 $10,231 $11,368
City Planner/Planning Manager $9,838 $11,941 $13,268
Community Affairs Manager $8,992 $10,916 $12,129
Community Improvement Manager $7,668 $9,493 $10,548
Community Services Manager $6,702 $8,134 $9,038
Community Services Superintendent $8,910 $10,814 $12,016
Cultural Center Manager $7,783 $9,446 $10,496
Deputy Dir. Engineering/Deputy City Eng.$9,854 $12,202 $13,558
Deputy Director of Electric Utility Services $10,564 $13,086 $14,540
Deputy Dir. of Innovation and Technology $8,787 $10,878 $12,087
Deputy Director of Animal Services $11,558 $14,315 $15,906
Deputy Director of Building and Safety $11,558 $14,315 $15,906
Deputy Director of City Clerk Services $11,911 $14,750 $16,389
Deputy Director of Community Services $11,911 $14,750 $16,389
Deputy Director of Economic Development $11,558 $14,315 $15,906
Deputy Director of Engineering $11,911 $14,750 $16,389
Deputy Director of Finance $11,323 $14,027 $15,585
Deputy Director of Human Resources $9,854 $12,202 $13,558
Deputy Director of Library Services $10,564 $13,086 $14,540
Deputy Director of Planning $11,558 $14,315 $15,906
Deputy Director of Public Works $11,558 $14,315 $15,906
Economic Development Manager $7,901 $9,783 $10,870
Environmental Programs Manager $7,901 $9,783 $10,870
Facilities Superintendent $7,888 $9,574 $10,638
Finance Manager $8,728 $10,597 $11,774
Library Services Manager $6,702 $8,299 $9,221
Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt $7,888 $9,574 $10,638
Plan Check & Inspection Manager $7,668 $9,308 $10,342
Principal Accountant $7,630 $9,446 $10,496
Principal Engineer $10,266 $12,462 $13,847
Principal Librarian $6,344 $7,700 $8,555
Principal Management Analyst $7,872 $9,555 $10,617
Principal Planner $9,040 $10,973 $12,192
Procurement Manager $7,554 $9,354 $10,393
Public Works Business Manager $9,038 $10,970 $12,189
Public Works Maintenance Manager $9,038 $10,970 $12,189
Revenue Manager $7,630 $9,261 $10,290
Risk Manager $8,728 $10,597 $11,774
Senior Civil Engineer $9,645 $11,706 $13,007
Senior Executive Assistant $7,190 $8,730 $9,700
Senior Planner $8,180 $9,931 $11,034
Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt $7,888 $9,574 $10,638
Traffic Engineer $10,340 $12,551 $13,945
Utilities Operations/Project Manager $7,331 $8,898 $9,887
Veterinarian $12,208 $14,824 $16,471
1
Page 294
Public Works Maintenance Employees
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 12, 2026
Resolution No. 2025-XXX
Classification MIN Amount Control Point Amount Max Amount
Electrician $5,024 $6,221 $6,913
Equipment Operator $4,487 $5,608 $6,231
Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat $3,599 $4,499 $4,999
Lead Maintenance Worker $4,393 $5,491 $6,418
Lead Mechanic $5,060 $6,325 $7,028
Maintenance Coordinator $4,900 $6,068 $6,742
Maintenance Worker $3,615 $4,474 $4,971
Mechanic $4,391 $5,437 $6,041
Senior Maintenance Worker $3,806 $4,758 $5,287
Signal & Lighting Coordinator $5,957 $7,447 $8,274
Signal & Lighting Technician $5,113 $6,391 $7,102
Page 295
Executive Management Group
Assignments of Classification to Pay Ranges
Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 12, 2026
Classification MIN Amount CP Amount MAX Amount
Animal Services Director $11,098 $13,376 $15,737
Assistant City Manager $19,710 $21,234 $24,981
Building and Safety Services Director $10,610 $13,699 $16,117
City Clerk Services Director $10,401 $13,220 $15,553
City Manager $22,088 $27,287 $32,102
Community Services Director $11,607 $15,555 $18,300
Deputy City Manager $16,754 $18,049 $21,234
Economic Development Director $11,491 $14,838 $17,456
Engagement and Special Programs Director $10,771 $13,767 $16,197
Engineering Services Director $11,900 $15,365 $18,076
Finance Director $12,953 $16,938 $19,927
Human Resources Director $11,491 $15,853 $18,651
Innovation and Technology Director $11,961 $16,353 $19,239
Library Director $10,933 $13,646 $16,054
Organizational Development Director $11,491 $15,853 $18,651
Planning Director $11,265 $14,543 $17,109
Public Works Services Director $11,607 $15,555 $18,300
Fire Chief*$18,171 $19,713 $23,191
* Included for informational purposes only - This is a Fire District Management Employee Group position not a City position
1
Page 296
Part-Time City Positions
Assignments of Classifications to Pay Ranges
Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 1, 2026
Resolution No. 2025-XXX
Part Time Classifications Minimum Amount Contro Point Maximum Amount
Administrative Intern*$16.90
Box Office Assistant $16.90 $17.76 $18.62
Box Office Specialist*$16.90
Customer Care Assistant $16.90 $20.16 $24.73
Day Custodian*$17.79
Energy Efficiency Coordinator $16.90 $19.77 $20.78
Engineering Intern*$16.90
Environmental Resources Intern*$16.90
GIS Intern*$16.90
Healthy Cities Coordinator $16.90 $20.16 $20.78
Library Page $16.90 $16.96 $17.02
Maintenance Technician $16.90 $17.62 $18.80
Meter Technician $28.73 $35.07 $36.86
Outreach Technician*$16.90
Park Ranger $18.62 $19.77 $20.98
Planning Aide*$16.90
Program Specialist*$16.90
Purchasing Clerk $16.90 $20.16 $20.37
Recreation Leader II $16.90 $17.54 $18.62
Theatre Technician I $17.54 $18.62 $19.77
Theatre Technician II $19.28 $20.47 $21.73
* Single Step
Part Time City Salary Schedule
January 1, 2026
Page 297
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has
determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that
policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays, and other policies for
employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has
previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits, and other terms of
employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate
changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, additions and deletions of classifications,
benefits, and other terms of employment; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined the use of
an existing salary range on a District full-time bargaining unit salary schedule for a part-time
position when a full-time equivalent is not listed in the District’s part-time salary schedule; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Salary Schedules (Exhibit A).
PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ___________, 2025.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 298
Fire Management Employees Group
Salary Schedule
As of January 3, 2026
Classification/Stipend Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Pay Frequency
Fire Chief 104.84 110.08 115.58 121.35 127.42 133.80 Hourly
8,386.81 8,806.70 9,246.52 9,707.99 10,193.68 10,703.63 Bi-Weekly
18,171.42 19,081.19 20,034.13 21,033.97 22,086.32 23,191.20 Monthly
218,056.98 228,974.31 240,409.53 252,407.61 265,035.80 278,294.35 Annually
Fire Deputy Chief 94.84 99.59 104.56 109.80 115.28 121.04 Hourly
7,586.96 7,966.92 8,365.04 8,784.15 9,222.35 9,683.47 Bi-Weekly
16,438.41 17,261.67 18,124.25 19,032.32 19,981.76 20,980.85 Monthly
197,260.88 207,140.04 217,490.96 228,387.87 239,781.11 251,770.15 Annually
Fire Batallion Chief 79.53 83.50 87.67 92.06 96.66 Hourly
(40 Hour Workweek)6,362.07 6,679.99 7,013.49 7,364.92 7,732.40 Bi-Weekly
13,784.48 14,473.31 15,195.90 15,957.32 16,753.54 Monthly
165,413.81 173,679.72 182,350.79 191,487.82 201,042.49 Annually
Fire Batallion Chief 56.80 59.64 62.62 65.76 69.04 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)6,362.07 6,679.99 7,013.49 7,364.92 7,732.40 Bi-Weekly
13,784.48 14,473.31 15,195.90 15,957.32 16,753.54 Monthly
165,413.81 173,679.72 182,350.79 191,487.82 201,042.49 Annually
Fire Marshal 85.30 89.56 94.03 98.75 103.67 Hourly
6,823.96 7,164.96 7,522.67 7,899.61 8,293.78 Bi-Weekly
14,785.24 15,524.07 16,299.12 17,115.82 17,969.85 Monthly
177,422.85 186,288.87 195,589.46 205,389.84 215,638.17 Annually
Fire Business Manager 57.39 60.26 63.27 66.43 69.75 73.24 Hourly
4,590.94 4,820.73 5,061.77 5,314.68 5,580.34 5,859.14 Bi-Weekly
9,947.03 10,444.91 10,967.16 11,515.15 12,090.73 12,694.80 Monthly
119,364.36 125,338.92 131,605.92 138,181.80 145,088.76 152,337.60 Annually
BC TRAINING OFFICER/SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT STIPEND (11% of 40 hr BC Current Step)
40 Hour Workweek 8.75 9.19 9.64 10.13 10.63 Hourly
56 Hour Workweek 6.25 6.56 6.89 7.23 7.59 Hourly
699.83 734.80 771.48 810.14 850.56 Bi-Weekly
1,516.29 1,592.06 1,671.55 1,755.31 1,842.89 Monthly
Exhibit A
Page 299
Fire Union
Assignments of Classificaiton to Pay Ranges
Effective January 3, 2026
CLASSIFICATION/STIPEND TYPE Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Pay Frequency
Fire Captain 42.27 44.39 46.61 48.94 51.38 Hourly
4,734.24 4,971.68 5,220.32 5,481.28 5,754.56 Bi-Weekly
10,257.76 10,772.17 11,311.47 11,875.66 12,467.50 Monthly
Fire Captain Specialist 42.27 44.39 46.61 48.94 51.38 Hourly
4,734.35 4,971.77 5,220.68 5,481.07 5,754.23 Bi-Weekly
10,257.76 10,772.17 11,311.47 11,875.66 12,467.50 Monthly
Fire Engineer 36.04 37.83 39.73 41.71 43.80 Hourly
4,036.13 4,236.54 4,449.71 4,671.80 4,905.39 Bi-Weekly
8,744.95 9,179.17 9,641.03 10,122.24 10,628.35 Monthly
Firefighter 31.48 33.05 34.71 36.45 38.27 Hourly
3,525.55 3,701.70 3,888.06 4,082.09 4,286.32 Bi-Weekly
7,638.70 8,020.36 8,424.14 8,844.52 9,287.02 Monthly
Field Training Officer 59.18 62.15 65.26 68.51 71.93 Hourly
(40 hour Workweek)4,734.35 4,971.77 5,220.68 5,481.07 5,754.23 Bi-Weekly
10,257.76 10,772.17 11,311.47 11,875.65 12,467.50 Monthly
Hazardous Material Stipend (5% of Fire Engr. Step E)
(40 Hour Workweek)3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 Hourly
245.27 245.27 245.27 245.27 245.27 Bi-Weekly
531.42 531.42 531.42 531.42 531.42 Monthly
Paramedic Stipend (13.92% of Fire Engr. Step E)
(40 Hour Workweek)8.54 8.54 8.54 8.54 8.54 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 Hourly
682.83 682.83 682.83 682.83 682.83 Bi-Weekly
1,479.47 1,479.47 1,479.47 1,479.47 1,479.47 Monthly
Technical Rescue Stipend (5% of Fire Engr. Step E)
(40 Hour Workweek)3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 Hourly
245.27 245.27 245.27 245.27 245.27 Bi-Weekly
531.42 531.42 531.42 531.42 531.42 Monthly
Terrorism Liaison Officer Stipend (2.5% of Fire Engr. Step E)
(40 Hour Workweek)1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Hourly
122.63 122.63 122.63 122.63 122.63 Bi-Weekly
265.71 265.71 265.71 265.71 265.71 Monthly
BA, BS, or Fire Officer Certification
(40 Hour Workweek)1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)1.31 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.31 Hourly
146.31 146.31 146.31 146.31 146.31 Bi-Weekly
317.00 317.00 317.00 317.00 317.00 Monthly
1
Page 300
Fire Union
Assignments of Classificaiton to Pay Ranges
Effective January 3, 2026
MA, MS or Chief Officer Certification
(40 Hour Workweek)2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 Hourly
(56 Hour Workweek)1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 Hourly
219.23 219.23 219.23 219.23 219.23 Bi-Weekly
475.00 475.00 475.00 475.00 475.00 Monthly
Fire Staff Premium (9.3% of the Employee’s Current Base Salary)
2
Page 301
Fire Support Services Association
Salary Schedule
As of January 3, 2026
Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX
Classification Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Pay Frequency
Communications Technician 26.26 27.57 28.95 30.39 31.91 33.51 Hourly
2,100.42 2,205.44 2,315.71 2,431.50 2,553.07 2,680.72 Bi-Weekly
4,550.91 4,778.45 5,017.37 5,268.24 5,531.65 5,808.23 Monthly
Community Affairs Senior Coordinator *31.53 33.12 34.76 36.49 38.32 40.24 Hourly
2,522.05 2,649.60 2,780.57 2,919.59 3,065.57 3,218.85 Bi-Weekly
5,464.45 5,740.80 6,024.56 6,325.79 6,642.07 6,974.18 Monthly
Community Outreach Specialist 29.95 31.44 33.01 34.67 36.40 38.22 Hourly
2,395.63 2,515.41 2,641.18 2,773.24 2,911.90 3,057.50 Bi-Weekly
5,190.53 5,450.05 5,722.56 6,008.68 6,309.12 6,624.57 Monthly
Deputy Fire Marshal 46.35 48.67 51.10 53.66 56.34 59.16 Hourly
3,708.15 3,893.56 4,088.24 4,292.65 4,507.28 4,732.65 Bi-Weekly
8,034.33 8,436.05 8,857.85 9,300.74 9,765.78 10,254.07 Monthly
Emergency Management Coordinator 39.33 41.29 43.36 45.53 47.80 50.19 Hourly
3,146.20 3,303.51 3,468.69 3,642.12 3,824.23 4,015.44 Bi-Weekly
6,816.77 7,157.60 7,515.49 7,891.26 8,285.83 8,700.12 Monthly
Emergency Manager 50.75 53.29 55.96 58.76 61.69 64.78 Hourly
4,060.38 4,263.40 4,476.57 4,700.40 4,935.42 5,182.19 Bi-Weekly
8,797.50 9,237.38 9,699.24 10,184.21 10,693.42 11,228.09 Monthly
Emergency Medical Services Administrator 55.66 58.44 61.36 64.43 67.65 71.04 Hourly
4,452.65 4,675.29 4,909.05 5,154.50 5,412.23 5,682.84 Bi-Weekly
9,647.42 10,129.79 10,636.28 11,168.09 11,726.49 12,312.82 Monthly
Emergency Medical Services Quality Improvement Nurse46.38 48.70 51.13 53.69 56.37 59.19 Hourly
3,710.12 3,895.63 4,090.42 4,294.94 4,509.69 4,735.18 Bi-Weekly
8,038.60 8,440.54 8,862.57 9,305.71 9,771.01 10,259.56 Monthly
Emergency Vehicle Technician I 27.66 29.04 30.49 32.01 33.61 35.29 Hourly
2,212.43 2,323.06 2,439.21 2,560.99 2,689.04 2,823.48 Bi-Weekly
4,793.60 5,033.29 5,284.95 5,548.81 5,826.25 6,117.54 Monthly
Emergency Vehicle Technician II 32.01 33.61 35.29 37.06 38.91 40.86 Hourly
2,560.99 2,689.04 2,823.48 2,964.68 3,112.91 3,268.57 Bi-Weekly
5,548.81 5,826.25 6,117.54 6,423.47 6,744.64 7,081.90 Monthly
Emergency Vehicle Technician III 37.06 38.91 40.86 42.90 45.04 47.30 Hourly
2,964.68 3,112.91 3,268.57 3,431.98 3,603.58 3,783.76 Bi-Weekly
6,423.47 6,744.64 7,081.90 7,435.96 7,807.76 8,198.15 Monthly
Fire Equipment Apprentice Mechanic 20.49 21.51 22.59 23.72 24.90 26.15 Hourly
1,638.94 1,720.88 1,806.93 1,897.27 1,992.14 2,091.74 Bi-Weekly
3,551.03 3,728.58 3,915.01 4,110.76 4,316.30 4,532.11 Monthly
Fire Equipment Lead Mechanic 30.49 32.02 33.62 35.30 37.06 38.92 Hourly
2,439.43 2,561.40 2,689.47 2,823.94 2,965.14 3,113.40 Bi-Weekly
5,285.42 5,549.70 5,827.18 6,118.55 6,424.47 6,745.70 Monthly
Fire Equipment Mechanic 27.65 29.04 30.49 32.01 33.61 35.29 Hourly
2212.33 2322.95 2439.10 2561.06 2689.11 2823.56 Bi-Weekly
4,793.39 5,033.06 5,284.72 5,548.96 5,826.40 6,117.72 Monthly
Fire Fleet Supervisor 42.62 44.75 46.99 49.33 51.80 54.39 Hourly
3,409.37 3,579.84 3,758.83 3,946.78 4,144.11 4,351.34 Bi-Weekly
7,386.97 7,756.32 8,144.14 8,551.35 8,978.91 9,427.90 Monthly
Fire Information Systems Technician 24.91 26.16 27.47 28.84 30.28 31.80 Hourly
1,993.10 2,092.76 2,197.39 2,307.26 2,422.63 2,543.75 Bi-Weekly
4,318.38 4,534.30 4,761.02 4,999.07 5,249.02 5,511.47 Monthly
Fire Support Services Association Salary Schedule
January 3, 2026
Page 302
Fire Support Services Association
Salary Schedule
As of January 3, 2026
Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX
Classification Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Pay Frequency
Fire Prevention Specialist Inspection I 29.10 30.55 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.14 Hourly
2,327.70 2,444.09 2,566.29 2,694.61 2,829.33 2,970.80 Bi-Weekly
5,043.35 5,295.53 5,560.30 5,838.32 6,130.22 6,436.73 Monthly
Fire Prevention Specialist Inspection II 32.08 33.68 35.36 37.13 38.99 40.94 Hourly
2,566.13 2,694.44 2,829.17 2,970.62 3,119.15 3,275.11 Bi-Weekly
5,559.96 5,837.96 6,129.86 6,436.35 6,758.17 7,096.07 Monthly
Fire Prevention Supervisor 36.50 38.32 40.24 42.25 44.36 46.58 Hourly
2,919.68 3,065.66 3,218.94 3,379.89 3,548.89 3,726.33 Bi-Weekly
6,325.97 6,642.26 6,974.37 7,323.10 7,689.25 8,073.72 Monthly
Fire Shop Administrator 46.88 49.22 51.68 54.27 56.98 59.83 Hourly
3,750.32 3,937.84 4,134.73 4,341.47 4,558.54 4,786.48 Bi-Weekly
8,125.70 8,531.99 8,958.59 9,406.51 9,876.84 10,370.70 Monthly
Fire Shop Supervisor 36.58 38.41 40.33 42.35 44.47 46.69 Hourly
2,926.59 3,072.92 3,226.56 3,387.89 3,557.28 3,735.15 Bi-Weekly
6,340.94 6,657.99 6,990.89 7,340.43 7,707.45 8,092.82 Monthly
Maintenance Officer 37.60 39.48 41.46 43.53 45.71 47.99 Hourly
3,008.16 3,158.56 3,316.49 3,482.32 3,656.43 3,839.26 Bi-Weekly
6,517.67 6,843.55 7,185.74 7,545.03 7,922.27 8,318.39 Monthly
Management Aide 26.64 27.98 29.38 30.84 32.39 34.01 Hourly
2,131.56 2,238.13 2,350.04 2,467.54 2,590.92 2,720.47 Bi-Weekly
4,618.37 4,849.29 5,091.75 5,346.35 5,613.66 5,894.35 Monthly
Management Analyst I*30.93 32.47 34.11 35.80 37.59 39.47 Hourly
2,474.02 2,597.71 2,729.09 2,863.98 3,007.18 3,157.54 Bi-Weekly
5,360.37 5,628.38 5,913.03 6,205.30 6,515.56 6,841.33 Monthly
Management Analyst II 35.54 37.32 39.18 41.14 43.20 45.36 Hourly
2,843.13 2,985.29 3,134.55 3,291.28 3,455.84 3,628.64 Bi-Weekly
6,160.12 6,468.12 6,791.53 7,131.11 7,487.66 7,862.04 Monthly
Management Analyst III 38.71 40.64 42.67 44.81 47.05 49.40 Hourly
3,096.49 3,251.31 3,413.88 3,584.57 3,763.80 3,951.99 Bi-Weekly
6,709.06 7,044.51 7,396.73 7,766.57 8,154.90 8,562.64 Monthly
Plans Examiner - Fire 35.75 37.54 39.42 41.39 43.46 45.63 Hourly
2,860.06 3,003.07 3,153.22 3,310.88 3,476.43 3,650.25 Bi-Weekly
6,196.80 6,506.64 6,831.97 7,173.58 7,532.25 7,908.86 Monthly
Public Education Specialist 29.08 30.53 32.06 33.66 35.34 37.11 Hourly
2,326.11 2,442.42 2,564.54 2,692.77 2,827.40 2,968.78 Bi-Weekly
5,039.91 5,291.90 5,556.50 5,834.33 6,126.04 6,432.35 Monthly
Public Relations Officer 44.90 47.15 49.50 51.97 54.57 57.30 Hourly
3,592.16 3,771.77 3,960.36 4,157.60 4,365.47 4,584.02 Bi-Weekly
7,783.02 8,172.17 8,580.78 9,008.12 9,458.53 9,932.03 Monthly
Administrative Assistant 18.85 19.84 20.88 21.98 23.14 24.36 Hourly
1,507.71 1,587.06 1,670.59 1,758.52 1,851.07 1,948.50 Bi-Weekly
3,266.71 3,438.64 3,619.62 3,810.13 4,010.66 4,221.74 Monthly
Executive Assistant 23.67 24.91 26.22 27.60 30.58 32.19 Hourly
1,893.21 1,992.85 2,097.74 2,208.15 2,446.78 2,575.48 Bi-Weekly
4,101.96 4,317.85 4,545.11 4,784.32 5,301.35 5,580.20 Monthly
Executive Assistant II*27.52 28.97 30.50 32.10 33.95 35.57 Hourly
2,201.99 2,317.89 2,439.88 2,568.30 2,715.84 2,845.76 Bi-Weekly
4,770.98 5,022.09 5,286.40 5,564.64 5,884.32 6,165.81 Monthly
*Per Fire District Policy, these positions will be hired at a minimum of $33.00 per hour.
Fire Support Services Association Salary Schedule
January 3, 2026
Page 303
Fire District Part-Time Hourly
Salary Schedule as of January 1, 2026
Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX
Classification Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Pay Frequency
Fire Clerk (one step)16.90 Hourly
Fire Prevention Assistant
Temporary/Part-Time (one step)16.90 Hourly
Office Services Clerk 16.90 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly
Office Specialist I 16.90 16.90 17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78 Hourly
Office Specialist II 16.90 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly
Quality Improvement
Specialist 27.79 29.18 30.64 32.17 33.78 35.47 Hourly
Fire District Part-Time Hourly Salary Schedule
January 1, 2026
Page 304
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager
Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
SUBJECT:Review of Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 – Hamilton Family
Brewery. This Review Does Not Constitute a Revocation Hearing under
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.14.110. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the City Council receive a presentation from City staff regarding the review of
Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 – Hamilton Family Brewery, discuss the subject matter, and
provide related feedback. This does not constitute a Revocation Hearing under Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.14.110.
BACKGROUND:
On January 15, 2024, the City approved Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 (MUP). The MUP
granted Hamilton Family Brewery (Brewery) approval to operate a 7,416 square foot
microbrewery with a 2,506 square foot outdoor seating area within the Center 1 (CE1) Zone at
8889 Archibald Avenue. The Brewery’s grand opening took place during the weekend of
September 26-28, 2025.
Recently, several members of the community addressed the City Council during Public Comment,
raising various concerns about business operations related to noise, traffic and parking,
occupancy, and adherence to conditions of approval. This staff report will provide an overview of
the actions City staff have taken to review the concerns raised by community members and to
collect related data. This data will also be used as part of the Director’s six (6) month review
pursuant to the MUP’s conditions of approval. A second review of business operations will also
take place twelve (12) months after operations have commenced, also pursuant to the MUP’s
conditions of approval.
Hamilton Family Brewery previously operated a microbrewery at 9757 7th Street. Conditional Use
Permit DRC2013-01079, previously approved on January 22, 2014, authorized the operation at
that location. A Conditional Use Permit Modification (DRC2015-00135) was also approved on
June 2, 2015, expanding the 1,680-square-foot microbrewery into an adjacent 1,680- square-foot
tenant space (3,360 square feet total). The CUP Modification also included the approval to expand
the hours of operation to 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. – seven days per week at the 7th Street location.
Business operations were conducted in a manner consistent with the approved CUP and
modifications and there were no outstanding concerns related to Brewery operations at the 7th
Street location.
Page 305
Page 2
3
2
2
2
The new and current location, 8889 Archibald Avenue, is zoned Center 1 (CE1). The standards
for this zoning designation permit the operation of a microbrewery with approval of a Minor Use
Permit. This current designation was implemented in the City’s 2021 General Plan Update
process. Previously, the site’s zoning designation was Industrial Park (IP). The prior designation
also conditionally allowed a microbrewery at the subject location.
The General Plan and Zoning Designations for Hamilton’s current site and surrounding properties
are as follows:
Existing Use General Plan Zoning
Hamilton Family Brewery Traditional Town Center Center 1 (CE1)
Convenience Store, & Single-Family
Residences Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential (L)
SBCTA Rail Facility N/A Neo Industrial (NI)
Multi-Family Development Traditional Town Center Center 1 (CE1)
Retail/Light Industrial Center Traditional Town Center Neo Industrial (NI)
Business Operations
The site’s last use prior to Hamilton Family Brewery was for the retail sales of electrical supplies
and equipment storage. To accommodate the Hamilton Family Brewery use, the 7,416-square-
foot building was reconfigured to include an approximate 2,910 square foot brewing facility, a
1,946 square foot indoor seating area with a small retail area and bar, with the remaining portion
of the building being used for walk-in coolers, equipment rooms, bathroom facilities, and offices.
The site includes a covered outdoor space for seating and is screened from the parking lot by an
existing block wall. A former freestanding storage building is being used as a trash enclosure and
for storage.
Minimum parking requirements were required to be met at the time business operations
commenced and at all times throughout operations. A total of 64 parking spaces were going to be
provided when business operations began. However, one (1) space was required to be removed
to modify the required path of travel along the exterior of the screened outdoor seating area. The
removal of the one (1) space does not create a deficiency in the number of required on-site
parking spaces. MUP approval also contemplates future site improvements, such as adding
landscaping in the Brewery‘s parking lot, relocating the site‘s ADA compliant parking, and altering
the parking lot’s circulation. Two (2) parking spaces were contemplated to be removed to
accommodate portions of said improvements. Regardless, both the 63 (existing) and 61 spaces
together exceed the minimum code requirement of 59 spaces. Required parking was calculated
based on the manufacturing and restaurant parking ratios provided in Development Code Table
17.64.050-1. The brewing area was calculated at the manufacturing parking ratio of two (2)
parking spaces per 1,000 square feet and the indoor bar/seating area and outdoor beer garden
were calculated at the restaurant parking ratio of one (1) parking space per 100 square feet.
Section 17.64.050 of the Development Code permits deducting certain floor areas when
Page 306
Page 3
3
2
2
2
tabulating required parking, such as storage and mechanical rooms, and bathrooms.
Parking Analysis
Parking Ratio Square Feet Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Brewery 2 Spaces per 1,000
Square Feet 1,694 2
Bar/Indoor
Seating
1 space per 100
Square Feet 3,099 31
Outdoor
Seating
1 Space per 100
Square Feet 2,506 26
Total Parking Spaces Required 59 63-61
Parking Spaces Over Minimum Requirement 4-2
The City’s MUP approval letter states that beer brewing is generally to take place Monday through
Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. During the first six (6) months of business operations,
the facility is approved to be open to the public for beer tasting Sunday through Wednesday from
12:00 pm to 10:00 pm and Thursday through Saturday from 12:00 pm to 12:00 am. As part of the
City’s MUP approval, after the first six (6) months of business operations, a request to extend
operating hours to 12:00 am Sunday through Wednesday can be made pursuant to the conditions
of approval. During the application process, it was reported there would be approximately 21 staff
members including managers, bartenders, servers, cleaning staff, and security. The total number
of employees may vary during peak times, such as weekends, holidays, and special events.
Beer sales for onsite consumption is to take place at the bar area and to be consumed within the
main building or in the adjacent covered outdoor area. Beer is also available for offsite
consumption in cans, bottles, and growlers. All staff members who serve alcoholic beverages are
required to go through ABC’s Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) program and the Licensee
Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program, which provides practical information on selling
alcoholic beverages safely, responsibly, and legally, with an emphasis on preventing sales to
minors, sales to obviously intoxicated persons, and illicit drug activity. Additionally, staff is to be
provided separate in-house training in the service of alcohol.
The business owner is required to either contract with a third-party security company or hire their
own security staff to provide security during evening hours on days the business is open past
10:00 p.m. Per project approval, security staff must monitor guests arriving and ensure they are
not entering the establishment intoxicated. If a guest is showing visible signs of intoxication, the
security team is not to allow them to enter and remain with them until they have safe transportation
home. The security team is also tasked with patrolling the parking lot, making sure there is no
consumption of off-site alcohol on the premises. If an issue arises with a customer, staff members
are instructed to promptly try to resolve the situation. If the issue escalates, the security team is
notified. The security team is responsible for staying with the problem customer/s until they have
safely left the property. Additionally, security cameras were to be placed in all customer-facing
and work areas of the building and in the parking lot.
Live music is approved to take place up to three (3) times a year, only on select Saturday
evenings. Volume levels are not to exceed the City’s noise standards as set forth in Section
17.66.050 of the City’s Development Code and must stop at 11:00 p.m. No musician shall perform
Page 307
Page 4
3
2
2
2
within twenty-five (25) feet of the site’s easterly property line. A condition addressing this issue
was included as part of the conditions of approval for the MUP.
One (1) food vendor is permitted onsite per day, and up to three (3) during special events. All
parking required by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code must be maintained at all times,
including during special events. MUP approval also included up to twelve (12) special events per
year, on a monthly basis, that correspond with either the release of a special beer or holiday (e.g.,
Saint Patrick’s Day, Cinco De Mayo, Octoberfest, etc.). Besides additional food trucks being
permitted on site, events could also include outdoor tented space, and all required parking would
need to be maintained at all times.
Alcoholic Beverage Control
The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has issued Hamilton Family
Brewery an interim operating permit. ABC may issue interim permits to an applicant for a license
to operate during the period an application is pending and when all the following conditions exist:
1. The application has been protested pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section
24011).
2. The department has made a determination based upon its investigation that the license
should be issued.
3. The applicant for the interim operating permit has filed with the department an application
for issuance of a license at the premises to themselves.
4. The interim operating permit is accompanied by a non-refundable application fee. This fee
may be adjusted by the department pursuant to subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 23320
of the California Business and Professions Code.
A protest in opposition of Hamilton’s ABC license application was filed with ABC and the requisite
hearing occurred on December 10, 2025. At the conclusion of the hearing, the presiding
Administrative Law Judge outlined the process for finalizing his decision. He must submit his
decision to ABC staff within thirty (30) days of the hearing, then it will be reviewed internally. The
Judge estimated that it could take a month and a half to two months for his decision to be posted.
The judge’s decision is also subject to appeal.
Public Notice During Minor Use Permit Application Submittal
The Municipal Code requires that all property owners within a 660-foot radius of a project site be
notified of a proposed MUP application. The notifications needed for this project were mailed on
November 2, 2023, and below is a map showing the properties that were noticed:
Page 308
Page 5
3
2
2
2
Staff received two emails opposing the project during the 10-day comment period, raising
concerns about noise, food vendors, alcohol service, traffic, and parking. The emails were
followed by a letter documenting opposition to the project and included 73 signatures. Thereafter,
staff received two (2) additional pieces of email correspondence regarding concerns related to
parking, security, noise, hours of operation, the product’s alcohol by volume, and the conduct of
business patrons. Notices were also sent to the same group of property owners prior to the
administrative hearing that is the subject of this report.
Conditions of Approval
Minor Use Permit applications are generally approved at the Director level. They do not require
either Planning Commission or City Council review. In approving a minor use permit, the Director
may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings
required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within the
City’s Development Code. As part of the review process, MUP applications are routed to different
City departments for review. Approval of Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 for Hamilton Family
Brewery includes thirty-seven (37) Planning Department conditions and twelve (12) Fire
Department conditions of approval. As stated earlier in this report, Planning Condition #19
requires the Director to review business operations six months after operations have commenced.
Page 309
Page 6
3
2
2
2
This review is to include consulting with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department
regarding calls for service and discussions with other City Departments, including, but not limited
to, Community Improvement. While a twelve (12) month review is also required, Planning
Condition #19 does not preclude the City from, at any time, enforcing or investigating possible
violations of any standard outlined in the Development Code. The full list of conditions of approval
is included in Attachment 1 to this report.
ANALYSIS:
Upon receiving multiple complaints from neighbors of Hamilton Family Brewery related to items
such as noise, traffic and parking, and adherence to conditions of approval, the City Manager
directed staff to investigate the claims against Hamilton Family Brewery’s business operations
and to provide a report to the City Council on staff’s findings. Staff’s investigation included:
Community Improvement staff visiting the area and conducting noise testing on at least
twelve (12) occasions at different times of day and on different days, as well as to observe
business operations.
Review of Sheriff’s Department calls for service related to Hamilton Family Brewery.
Undercover Sheriff’s Department operation conducted.
Engineering staff analyzing potential for STOP sign installation and obtained traffic counts.
A site visit to the premises on December 1, 2025.
Correspondence with Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control staff regarding Hamilton
Family Brewery’s interim operating permit, and witnessing the protest hearing.
Page 310
Page 6
3
2
2
2
Page 311
Page 7
3
2
2
2
Calls for Service
As of the writing of this report, Sheriff’s Department staff have responded to sixty-seven (67) calls
for service and a summary is provided below.
Type Total Notes
Alarm 3 Identified alarm calibration sensitivity. Per business
owner, issue has been corrected.
Area Check 6 Parking citation issued in response to 1 report.
DUI 1 Driver arrested in response to 1 report.
Extra Patrol 3 No action taken and residents’ concerns forwarded to
City staff.
Follow Up 1 Phone contact made with reporting party regarding
parking and noise reports.
Hit & Run 1 No crime found.
Incident 4 3 reports documented.
Keep the Peace 1 Issue resolved between 2 parties and call cancelled.
Music Disturbance 2 Reporting parties advised of City's noise ordinance.
Noise Complaint 6 No disturbances found and no citations issued.
Parking Violation 16
1 citation issued for vehicle blocking driveway; 1 vehicle
tagged for 72-hr parking notice; in response to 2 calls
multiple vehicles cited for parking in prohibited areas.
Subject Check 4 No disturbances found and reporting party advised to
contact City regarding permit parking district.
Traffic Hazard 1 No violations found.
Traffic Stop 1 Citation issued.
Unknown Disturbance 4 No disturbances found (3); Non-Customer asked to leave
business premises (1).
Unwanted Subject 1 No disturbances found.
Vehicle Check 12 Citations issued in response to 6 reports.
Total 67
Findings:
According to the business owner, the Brewery’s security alarm system has been
recalibrated to reduce the sensitivity of the alarm system and number of instances it
activates.
Six (6) Area Check calls resulted in one (1) instance of a parking citation being issued.
One (1) call resulted in an arrest of driver who was under the influence of alcohol.
Page 312
Page 8
3
2
2
2
One (1) for a Hit & Run resulted in no crime being found.
Calls for Extra Patrol in the area resulted in no citations issued.
Music disturbance calls resulted in the reporting parties being advised of the City’s noise
standards.
No citations were issued, or disturbances found in response to six (6) noise complaints.
Sixteen (16) calls for Parking Violations resulted in two (2) instances of multiple citations
being issued; one (1) citation being issued for a vehicle blocking a residential driveway;
and one (1) instance of a vehicle being tagged with a 72-hour parking notice.
Twelve (12) vehicle checks resulted in six (6) instances of citations being issued for
parking in prohibited areas.
Noise
Business operations at Hamilton Family Brewery are required to be conducted in a manner
consistent with the City’s noise standards outlined in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Findings:
Initial noise readings along Main Street, directly across from Hamilton Family Brewery,
have not exceeded City noise standards, nor have noise readings exceeded City noise
standards in the parking lot of the development directly to the east of the Brewery location.
As shown in the Calls for Service section of this report, the Sheriff’s Department received
six (6) noise-related complaints, and two (2) other complaints related to an alleged music
disturbance. These complaints were investigated but did not warrant citations or further
action from Sheriff’s Department personnel.
Sheriff’s Department staff also responded to three (3) calls related to alarm noise. Calls
were in response to reports that the Brewery’s alarm system was going off repeatedly
through the night, including voice alerts.
Response:
During a discussion with City staff, Brewery ownership acknowledged that the alarm system
included a sensitive calibration, and informed staff that they worked with the alarm service
provider to reduce its sensitivity and remove the voice alerts under most circumstances.
Community Improvement staff has experienced similar concerns with other businesses adjacent
to residential districts, and once the calibration is achieved, concerns usually abate.
Traffic and Parking
Staff received correspondence from a resident in the area regarding parking enforcement and
safety violations, traffic safety and speeding, Hamilton Family Brewery signage, and the process
for petitioning for a residential parking district. This correspondence included requests for and
clarification on items such as the following:
How the current No Parking signage is being enforced
Page 313
Page 9
3
2
2
2
Feasibility of red curb painting along Main Street to improve visibility and aid enforcement
Enforcement related to vehicle parking near fire hydrants
STOP sign analysis at Main Street and Reid Avenue
Traffic calming measures
Use of Hamilton Family Brewery’s signage – Blue cone signs indicating “No Brewery
Parking”; blue cone signs indicating “Brewery Parking”, and a flashing sign that read “No
Street Parking/You Will be Towed/Park on 7th Shuttle”
Request for information on petitioning for a residential parking zone for Main Street, Reid
Avenue, and Feron Boulevard
Findings:
Fading and incomplete signage
STOP sign analysis did not warrant installation
Conditions of Approval address the potential for creating a Permit Parking District
Response:
In response, staff provided feedback to the resident regarding the City’s practices and policies for
red curb installation in front of fire hydrants, their request for All-Way STOP control at Main Street
and Reid Avenue, and traffic calming measures. For example, the City’s practice is not to place
red curbs in front of fire hydrants, since the California Vehicle Code does not permit parking in
front of them.
In reviewing resident concerns about No Parking signage, it was clear that the current signage is
in disrepair and incomplete. Staff is in the process of replacing the faded signs in the cul-de-sac
on the east end of Main Street and will install an additional “No Parking Anytime” sign along the
south side of Main Street near 9789 Main Street to better identify the area where vehicles are not
allowed to park. The signs are expected to be installed by the end of December 2025. The City’s
enforcement efforts in the area will continue.
The installation of All-Way STOP control must meet the warrants described in the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Warrants include the average number
of vehicles per hour, as well as reported collisions in a 12-month period. Traffic counts were taken
in October during both the week and weekend. The intersection of Main Street and Reid Avenue
did not meet the engineering criteria to warrant an All-Way STOP. The highest total number of
vehicles entering the intersection during a one-hour period was 66 and the warrants require an
average of 300 vehicles per hour for any 8-hour period on an average day. There have also not
been five or more reported collisions in a 12-month period that are correctable by an All-Way
STOP. It is also important to note that STOP signs are not designed to be speed control devices
and are not permitted to be used as such under CA MUTCD. In addition to traffic volume counts,
speed counts were recorded for a 24-hour period during the week and weekend by referencing
the speed at which 85% of the drivers are traveling on a roadway under non-congested conditions.
The weekday 85th percentile speed was 32 mph for both east and west bound directions. The 85th
percentile of speed on the weekend was 26 mph. On both weekday and weekend speed counts,
the westbound speeds were slightly higher. The recorded data does not show that vehicles are
constantly or even consistently traveling at speeds over 40 mph. Based on the data collected,
Staff does not recommend any traffic calming measures along Main Street at this time.
As of the time this report was written, Sheriff’s Department staff reported receiving sixteen (16)
calls regarding alleged parking violations, one (1) call regarding a traffic hazard, and conducted
one (1) traffic stop during visits to the location since September 26, 2025. Three (3) of the sixteen
Page 314
Page 10
3
2
2
2
(16) calls for parking violations resulted in citations being issued. Two (2) of the calls resulted in
multiple citations being issued for parking in a posted No Parking Anytime zone. Furthermore,
one (1) vehicle was found to be parked in front of a fire hydrant, one (1) vehicle was tagged for a
72-hour parking notice, and two (2) vehicles were found to be blocking driveways. Contact was
made with the business owner regarding some of the calls, and the owner responded by providing
instructions to patrons about vehicle parking restrictions. Later in this report, additional measures
taken by the business owner will be discussed.
Planning Condition #23 states that, should the City determine that the use has created a parking
issue, the City may initiate a permit parking district at no cost to the adjacent residential
neighborhood. The cost for that permit parking district formation and permits would be borne by
the applicant. Additionally, the applicant may be required to provide the City with a parking study,
as well as work with neighboring commercial locations, to secure additional off-site parking for
business patrons. At this time, staff has not determined that a parking issue has been created by
the subject use, necessitating the initiation of a permit parking district. In response to the resident's
correspondence described earlier in this report, Staff provided the resident with the appropriate
forms to initiate a permit parking district, however, that effort has not been completed at this time.
Further, if it were implemented as a resident preference, it would not be based on the condition
of approval, and the costs would not be borne by the business. City staff will continue to monitor
this item as part of the Director’s six (6) month review.
Ownership of Hamilton Family Brewery ordered “No Parking” signs for their neighbors (attached
to cones), hired a shuttle service to transport business patrons from their former location to their
new location (for approximately 1.5 months), used lighted traffic-control signs directing visitors
where to park, and staffed attendants in the Brewery’s parking lot to help prevent guests from
parking on Main Street. These items were implemented for the Brewery’s grand opening and
initial business operations. Additionally, Brewery ownership met with at least one restaurant
owner whose business is located in a shopping center directly across Archibald Avenue. While
this business owner previously reported parking issues they believed were due to the opening of
Hamilton Family Brewery, the shopping center’s parking area now includes signage stating that
there is no Brewery parking in the shopping center and that violators will be towed at their own
expense.
Occupant Load
Maximum building occupancy is generally determined using occupant load factors (square feet
per person), based on the space's use, and then checked against egress and fire-safety limits to
ensure occupants can exit safely in an emergency. Occupant load is therefore described as the
number of people for which the means of egress are designed, and it is required that the
permissible load not exceed what can be safely evacuated using exits and paths of travel. The
approved occupant load for the indoor brewery area is 115. The beer brewing area has an
additional occupant load of 20. Additionally, the occupant load for the 2,506 square feet of outdoor
dining area outlined in the MUP approval is 166. Conditions of approval for the Brewery use
require City approval of modifications to the building or operations that would increase occupancy.
Findings:
As stated earlier in this report, MUP approval allows for 2,506 square feet of outdoor
seating area. During their site visit, staff identified that an area greater than 2,506 square
feet of space was being used for outdoor seating purposes. The area being used for
outdoor dining appeared to be more than twice as large as the area described in the MUP
approval.
Page 315
Page 11
3
2
2
2
Response:
Following standard operating procedures, business ownership was notified of the discrepancy,
which at minimum would trigger the need for additional on-site parking, and a Compliance Order
was issued by the City’s Community Improvement staff on December 4, 2025. The Order required
the business to cease the unapproved use of outdoor seating area in excess of 2,506 square feet.
As of the writing of this report, business ownership responded to the City’s Compliance Order and
presented an exhibit detailing their outdoor seating area with a written narrative regarding their
position.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Community members recently addressed the City Council, raising various concerns about
Hamilton Family Brewery’s business operations. Approval of Hamilton’s Minor Use Permit
includes 49 conditions of approval. Planning Condition #19 requires the Planning Director to
review business operations six (6) months after operations have commenced (March 2026). This
condition also requires the same review twelve (12) months after operations have commenced.
The purpose of these reviews is to ensure operations are being conducted in a manner consistent
with the project approval and corresponding conditions. If violations are found, the business will
be provided notification, and be given the appropriate time to comply.
In response to resident concerns, and the condition of approval requiring a six (6) month review
of business operations, the following has occurred:
1. Community Improvement, and other City staff have, and continue to, review concerns
raised by community members and collect related data. This includes visiting the location
on multiple occasions, observing operations, and taking decibel readings to monitor the
noise levels of the business.
2. Sheriff Department personnel have responded to and investigated multiple calls for
service.
3. Engineering staff have reviewed and responded to questions from the public, collected
traffic volume and speed data, reviewed questions regarding STOP sign placement, and
provided at least one resident with the forms necessary for initiating a permit parking
district.
4. Staff has requested copies of video, audio, or pictures that show potential violations.
5. Staff has discussed community concerns with Hamilton Family Brewery ownership and
provided an opportunity for ownership to respond.
6. Staff initiated review of Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 and its conditions of approval.
This will continue and findings will inform the Planning Director’s required six (6) month
review of business operations.
7. Community Improvement staff issued a Compliance Order on December 4, 2025, for the
use of outdoor seating area beyond the 2,506 square feet approved per the MUP. The
Order required the business to cease the unapproved use of outdoor seating area in
excess of 2,506 square feet.
Page 316
Page 12
3
2
2
2
8. Staff has corresponded with Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control staff regarding
Hamilton Family Brewery’s interim operating permit, and the protest submitted in response
to their license application. Staff will be requesting copies of evidence submitted as part
of the ABC protest hearing.
Staff will continue to monitor business operations and respond to calls for service, as well as
conduct the Director level review of business operations at the six (6) and twelve (12) month
marks.
At the conclusion of staff’s presentation of this item, the City Council will have the opportunity to
hear testimony from the public and representatives of Hamilton Family Brewery, discuss the
subject matter, and provide related feedback to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item supports the City Council’s vision of actively seeking and respectfully considering all
public input.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257 – Hamilton Family Brewery
Attachment 2 – Images Submitted by Residents
Attachment 3 – Compliance Order
Page 317
January 15, 2024
Joshua Hamilton
9757 7th Street, Suite 802
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SUBJECT: APPROVAL LETTER FOR MINOR USE PERMIT DRC2023-00257 – HAMILTON FAMILY
BREWERY – Operation of a 7,416 square foot microbrewery with a 2,506 square foot
outdoor seating area within the Center 1 (CE1) Zone at 8889 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0209-
062-10. The project qualifies for Class 1 and Class 3 exemptions under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities and 15303 – New Construction or Conversion
of Small Structures.
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
The Minor Use Permit process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and
approval has been granted based upon the findings and conditions set forth in this letter and its
attachments.
Background:
Hamilton Family Brewery operates an existing microbrewery at 9757 7th Street and is requesting to relocate
that facility to 8889 Archibald Avenue. The current location was approved by Conditional Use Permit
DRC2013-01079 on January 22, 2014. A Conditional Use Permit Modification (DRC2015-00135) was
approved on June 2, 2015, expanding the existing 1,680-square-foot microbrewery into an adjacent 1,680-
square-foot tenant space (3,360 square feet total). The CUP Modification also included the approval to
expand the hours of operation to 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. – seven days per week. Business operations
have been conducted in a manner consistent with the approved CUP and modifications. Therefore, neither
the Planning & Economic Development Director nor Planning Commission have had to conduct additional
review of the existing operations.
The subject property, located at 8889 Archibald Avenue, has a current zoning designation of Center 1
(CE1). The standards for this desigination permit the operation of a microbrewery with approval of a Minor
Use Permit. This current designation was developed as a result of the City’s 2021 General Plan Update
process. Previously, the site’s zoning designation was Industrial Park (IP). That desigination would have
also allowed a microbrewery at the subject location and that use type was carried over to the current CE1
zone.
The existing uses, General Plan, and Zoning Designation for this project site and surrounding properties
are as follows:
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 318
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 2
Existing Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Commercial/Industrial
Building Traditional Town Center Center 1 (CE1)
North Convenience Store and
Single-Family Residences Traditional Neighborhood Low Residential (L)
South SBCT Rail Facility N/A Neo Industrial (NI)
East Multi-family Development Traditional Town Center Center 1 (CE1)
West Retail/Light Industrial Center Traditional Town Center Neo Industrial (NI)
Project Description:
The applicant, Joshua Hamilton, on behalf of Hamilton Family Brewery, is requesting to operate a
microbrewery in an existing building at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Main Street. Table
17.136.020-1 of the Development Code (Allowed Land Uses in Form-Based Zones) permits
microbreweries in the Center 1 (CE1) zone subject to the approval of a Minor Use Permit. The existing
onsite buildings were previously used for the retail sales of electrical supplies and equipment storage. The
49,897 square foot project site is developed with a 7,416 square foot main building, a 4,632 square foot
covered storage area, and an approximate 730 square foot free-standing storage building. The site also
includes 12 parking spaces along with a large gated open storage area.
The 7,416-square-foot building will be reconfigured to include a 2,910 square foot brewing facility, a 1,946
square foot indoor seating area with a small retail area and bar, with the remaining portion of the building
to be used for walk-in coolers, equipment rooms, bathroom facilities, and offices. The covered outdoor
storage area will be used for outdoor seating (beer garden) and will be screened from the parking lot by
an existing block wall. The freestanding storage building will be used as a trash enclosure and for storage.
The existing parking and vehicle storage lot will be redesigned into a large contiguous parking facility.
Vehicle access to the site will be from the existing driveways on Archibald Avenue and Main Street. The
changes to the onsite buildings and parking lot will be reviewed separately under Site Development Review
DRC2023-00411.
Minimum parking requirements will be met at the time business operations commmece. A total of 64
parking spaces will be provided when business operations begin. As additional site improvements occur,
2 parking spaces will be removed to accommodate portions of said improvements. However, both the 64
and 62 spaces represent a total that is greater than the minimum code requirement of 59 spaces. Required
parking was calculated based on the manufacturing and restaurant parking ratios provided in Development
Code Table 17.64.050-1. The brewing area was calculated at the manufacturing parking ratio of 2 parking
spaces per 1,000 square feet and the indoor bar/seating area and outdoor beer garden were calculated at
the restaurant parking ratio of 1 parking space per 100 square feet. Section 17.64.050 of the Development
Code permits deducting certain floor areas when tabulating required parking such as storage and
mechanical rooms, and bathrooms.
Page 319
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 3
PARKING ANALYSIS
Parking Ratio Square Feet Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Brewery 2 Spaces per 1,000
Square Feet 1,694 2
Bar/Indoor
Seating
1 space per 100
Square Feet 3,099 31
Outdoor
Seating
1 Space per 100
Square Feet 2,506 26
Total Parking Spaces Required 59 64-62
Parking Spaces Over Minimum Requirement
5-3
The beer brewing process will generally take place Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m., however the brewing hours may vary slightly. During the first six (6) months of business
operations the facility will be open to the public for beer tasting Sunday through Wednesday from 12:00
pm to 10:00 pm and Thursday through Saturday from 12:00 pm to 12:00 am. Please note that after the
first six (6) months of business operations, a request to extend operating hours to 12:00 am Sunday
through Wednesday can be made pursuant to the attached conditions. There will be approximately 21
staff members including managers, bartenders, servers, cleaning staff, and security. The total number of
employees will vary for peak times such as weekends, holidays, and special events.
The sale of beer for onsite consumption will take place at the bar area to be consumed within the main
building or in the adjacent outdoor beer garden. Beer will also be available for sale for offsite consumption
in the form of cans, bottles, and growlers. Both onsite and offsite sales will require age verification per the
requirements of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC).
All staff members who serve alcoholic beverages will be required to go through ABC’s Responsible
Beverage Service (RBS) program and the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program,
which provide practical information on selling alcoholic beverages safely, responsibly, and legally, with an
emphasis on preventing sales to minors, sales to obviously intoxicated persons, and illicit drug activity.
Additionally, staff will be provided separate in-house training in the service of alcohol.
The applicant will contract with a 3rd party security company or hire their own security staff to provide
security services during evening hours on those days the business is open past 10:00 p.m. Security staff
will monitor guests arriving and check to ensure guests are not entering the establishment intoxicated. If a
guest is showing visible signs of intoxication, the security team will not allow them to enter and will remain
with them until they have safe transportation home. The security team will also be tasked with patrolling
the parking lot making sure there is no consumption of off -site alcohol. If an issue arises with a customer,
a staff member will promptly resolve the situation with friendly customer service. If the issue escalates, the
security team will be notified and will intervene. The security team will be responsible for staying with the
problem customer/s until they have safely left the property. Additionally, security cameras will be placed in
all customer-facing, and work areas of the building and in the parking lot. All footage will be kept for 30
days. Additional conditions of approval have been developed and are provided as an attachment to this
document.
The applicant has provided a list of 12 special events that correspond with either the release of a special
beer or a holiday (e.g., Saint Patrick’s Day, Cinco De Mayo, Octoberfest, etc.). Special events typically
take place once per month and involve the use of portable bathrooms, additional food vendors, and
covered seating space in the parking lot. During special events, customers are age-verified at the entrance
Page 320
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 4
by their security team and given wristbands.
Live music will take place up to 3 times a year, only on select Saturday evenings. Volume levels will not
exceed the City’s noise standards as set forth in Section 17.66.050 of the City’s Development Code and
must stop at 11:00 p.m. No musician shall perform within twenty-five (25) feet of the site’s easterly property
line. A condition addressing this issue has been included as part of the conditions of approval attached to
this letter.
One food vendor will be onsite per day, and up to 3 food vendors during special events. All parking required
by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code must be maintained at atll times, including during special
events. The list of vendors is constantly updated, with vendors pulled from a list provided by San
Bernardino County’s Health Department. Each vendor on this list must have a current and approved MFF
(mobile food facility) license. Food vendors will be located in the parking lot adjacent to the brewery building
and open area and shaded canopy.
Public Notice:
The Municipal Code requires that all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site be notified
of the proposed Minor Use Permit application. The required notifications were mailed on November 2,
2023 and below is a map showing properties that notices were sent to.
Page 321
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 5
Planning staff received two emails in opposition to the project within the 10-day comment period raising
concerns related to noise, food vendors, alcohol service, traffic, and parking. The emails were followed by
a letter documenting opposition to the project and included 73 signatures. Thereafter, staff received two
(2) additional pieces of email correspondence regarding concerns also related to parking, security, noise,
hourse of operation, the product’s percentage of alcohol by volume, and conduct of business patrons
Sheriff’s Department Information:
The existing brewery location does not register as a problem location, nor has it created an inordinate
number of traffic related issues. Sheriff's Department data does not indicate that Hamilton Family Brewery's
existing location is generating an abnormally high call volume.
Environmental Determination:
The project scope is for the operation of a microbrewery in an existing commercial building. Prior to any
action being taken for this request, Planning and Economic Development Department staff has determined
that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The project qualifies for a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 –
Existing Facilities. The project also qualifies for a Class 3 exemption – New Construction or Conversion of
Small Structures.
Minor Use Permit Findings of Approval:
1. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development proposed, and the
proposed location, size, and design of the use are compatible with adjacent uses or with natural
resources. The project site is located on Archibald Avenue and is well-suited for the development of
a microbrewery. The existing on-site structures will be improved to meet the operating requirements
of a microbrewery and are located along the south property line providing a buffer to the existing
residential development to the north. The existing parking lot and storage yard will be reconfigured to
provide the required number of parking spaces, efficient circulation, and emergency vehicle access.
The subject site has a general plan land use designation of Traditional Town Center. Properties and
areas with these designations are to be the focal points of community activity, providing residents of
surrounding neighborhoods with a wide range of retail and civic amenities and community gathering
places within close reach of their homes. Many centers provide primarily retail and service commercial
uses to surrounding neighborhoods. One important aspiration articulated by the community through
the 2021 general plan update process was to have more destinations within easier reach of
neighborhoods. The general plan enables centers to be more inviting, human scale public gathering
spaces that are highly accessible from surrounding neighborhoods. Conditions of approval have been
developed to insure compliance with applicable sections of the Rancho Cucamonga Develoment
Code; and
2. The operating characteristics of the proposed use, including traffic, noise, light, and other
characteristics, will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other adjacent uses or
uses in the vicinity. The proposed microbrewery is not expected to produce traffic, noise, or light out
of character with the neighborhood or in a manner inconsistent with the performance standards
outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66. The project site is located at the corner of a busy four-
lane street (Archibald Avenue) to the west, a local two-lane street (Main Street) to the north, and an
active rail line to the south. Surrounding development includes a convenience store and residential
development to the north, automotive repair shops, restaurants, and commercial uses to the west,
and residential development to the east. The City’s performance standards include requirements
related to the placement of outdoor lighting, outdoor light shielding, the level of illumination, maximum
noise levels and more. All required off- street parking will be provided and maintained at all times
during business operations, including during any special event. The subject site has a general plan
land use designation of Traditional Town Center. Properties and areas with these designations are
to be the focal points of community activity, providing residents of surrounding neighborhoods with a
Page 322
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 6
wide range of retail and civic amenities and community gathering places within close reach of their
homes. Many centers provide primarily retail and service commercial uses to surrounding
neighborhoods. One important aspiration articulated by the community through the 2021 general plan
update process was to have more destinations within easier reach of neighborhoods. The general
plan enables centers to be more inviting, human scale public gathering spaces that are highly
accessible from surrounding neighborhoods.Conditions of approval have been developed to insure
compliance with applicable sections of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, including those
related to traffic, noise, and light; and
3. The proposed improvements of the site, including building design, height and bulk of buildings,
setbacks, fencing, landscaping, signage size, and location, are compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood or area. The proposed microbrewery will reuse the existing onsite buildings and vehicle
connections to the adjacent public streets. The parking lot will be upgraded to improve onsite
circulation and fire department access. New landscaping will be installed to comply with the related
parking lot landscape requirements. The size and location of signage will comply with existing sign
regulations. Improvements are subject to approval of a separate Site Development Review
application; and
4. The proposed use shall not result in conditions that would be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare of the community. The project site is in an area developed with a mix of light industrial
(automotive repair), commercial (convenience stores, restaurants, and support services), and
residential land uses. The operating characteristics of the proposed microbrewery are not expected
to create negative impacts that would impact the surrounding community. Construction activities will
be limited to tenant improvement to the existing onsite structures and will be required to comply with
existing limitations on construction hours and noise levels. The attached conditions of approval also
provide the Planning and Economic Development Director with the ability to review the business
operations and place new restrictions if it is determined that the use is creating a negative impact on
the community; and
5. Adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed use or will be made
available concurrent with the proposed development. The project site is served by existing public
facilities and infrastructure and the proposed redevelopment of the existing onsite facilities as a
microbrewery will not require the construction of new public facilities or expansion of existing services;
and
6. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed location would be consistent with and help achieve the
goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan and the Development Code. The proposed
microbrewery is permitted in the Center 1 (CE1) Zone subject to the approval of a Minor Use Permit.
This current zoning designation was developed as a result of the City’s 2021 General Plan Update
process. Previously, the site’s zoning designation was Industrial Park (IP). That desigination would
have also allowed a microbrewery at the subject location and that use type was carried over to the
current CE1 zone.
The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, including
providing an adequate number of parking spaces and complying with the general performance
standards related to noise, odors, and vibrations. Additionally, the proposed use complies with the
general plan and other applicable City regulations/standards. The project is in keeping with the
Traditional Town Center land use designation which envisions that the site be developed with a range
of commercial uses including general retail, personal services, restaurants, and microbreweries.
Properties and areas with these designations are to be the focal points of community activity, providing
residents of surrounding neighborhoods with a wide range of retail and civic amenities and community
gathering places within close reach of their homes. Many centers provide primarily retail and service
commercial uses to surrounding neighborhoods. One important aspiration articulated by the
community through the 2021 general plan update process was to have more destinations within easier
reach of neighborhoods. The general plan enables centers to be more inviting, human scale public
Page 323
APPROVAL LETTER
MINOR USE PERMIT – HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
January 15, 2024
Page 7
gathering spaces that are highly accessible from surrounding neighborhoods. Conditions of approval
have been developed to insure compliance with applicable sections of the Rancho Cucamonga
Develoment Code; and
7. The project would not result in a negative effect to the City’s land use inventory available for residential
and economic development, consistent with the intent of the general plan land use element. The reuse
of the existing commercial site as a microbrewery will not impact existing housing units and will
increase economic activity on a currently underutilized site. The subject site has a general plan land
use designation of Traditional Town Center. Properties and areas with these designations are to be
the focal points of community activity, providing residents of surrounding neighborhoods with a wide
range of retail and civic amenities and community gathering places within close reach of their homes.
Many centers provide primarily retail and service commercial uses to surrounding neighborhoods.
One important aspiration articulated by the community through the 2021 general plan update process
was to have more destinations within easier reach of neighborhoods. The general plan enables
centers to be more inviting, human scale public gathering spaces that are highly accessible from
surrounding neighborhoods. Conditions of approval have been developed to insure compliance with
applicable sections of the Rancho Cucamonga Develoment Code
This project is approved, subject to the information provided in this letter and the attached conditions of
approval. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of
building permits. If there is a discrepancy between the materials on file with the City and either this letter
or the project’s conditions of approval, this letter and the conditions supersede unless otherwise noted.
This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal period beginning with the date of this
letter. All appeals shall be submitted in writing to the City Clerk's Office, identifying the
determination or action being appealed and specifically stating the basis or grounds of the appeal.
Appeals shall be filed no later than January 25, 2024 and must be accompanied by a filing fee of
$1,853.
Should you have any questions, please contact Matt Marquez, Director of Planning & Economic
Development or his designee at (909) 477-2750 or at matt.marquez@cityofrc.us.
Sincerely,
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Matt Marquez
Director of Planning and Economic Development
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Site and Floor Plans
3. Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions
Page 324
www.CityofRC.us Page 1 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
Conditions of Approval
Community Development
Project #: DRC2023-00257
Project Name: Hamilton Family Brewery
Location: 8889 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020906201-0000
Project Type: Minor Use Permit
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs
another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or (3) uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke
an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises.
2. An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year
of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any
physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or
at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by
the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken. “Objectionable conditions
that constitute a nuisance” means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness, drinking in public,
harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or
excessive loud noise.
3. The applicant shall contract with a 3rd party security company or hire their own security staff to provide security
services during the evening hours on those days the business is open past 10:00 pm. Security will also be provided
during special events.
4. A security plan, as detailed in subject project’s application, shall be implemented and be in effect along with measures
outlined in these conditions and the project’s approval letter. The hours security will be provided on-site is outlined
in Planning Department condition number 3. A final security plan must be submitted to the Planning & Economic
Development Director prior to business operations commencing. Changes to the security plan may be required by
the Director of Planning & Economic Development or the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department should review
of the business operations necessitate changes to ensure the protection of the community’s health, safety, and
welfare.
5. Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment’s no loitering policy and shall take
“reasonable steps” (as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California
Business and Professions Code) to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance.
6. Surveillance cameras shall be installed on the premises in all areas where alcoholic beverages are served
and/or consumed and in the parking lot area.
7. Video recordings from surveillance cameras shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of
704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept.
8. The uniform of the security guards shall have the word “Security” clearly visible on it.
9. All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
(LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of
being hired. These staff members must also complete the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control’s Responsible
Page 325
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
Beverage Services (RBS) program. At their discretion, the Director of Planni ng & Economic Development may
request proof of completion of RBS and LEAD training.
10. Any proposed floor plan, seating, occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval.
11. Approval is granted for the operation of a microbrewery with beer tasting in an existing 7,416 building
with a 2,506 square foot outdoor seating area (beer garden) at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue
and Main Street - APN: 0209-062-10. Approval includes up to 12 special events per year as outlined in
the application on file with the City’s Planning & Economic Development Department.
12. The hours of operation for beer tasting are limited to the following hours:
Sunday through Wednesday – 12:00 pm to 10:00 pm
Thursday through Saturday – 12:00 pm to 12:00 am
At the conclusion of the Director of Planning & Economic Development’s six (6) month review as outlined in
Planning Department condition number 19, the City may consider increasing business hours to 12:00 am Sunday
through Wednesday.
13. Entertainment as defined by Development Code section 17.16.170 is not permitted without the prior
approval of an entertainment permit.
14. Live music will take place up to 3 times a year, only on select Saturday evenings. Music must be played in a
manner consistent with the City’s noise standards as set forth in Section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards) of the City’s
Development Code and must stop at 11:00 pm. No musician shall perform within twenty-five (25) feet of the site’s
easterly property line. Live performances may require approval of an entertainment permit pursuant to Section
17.16.170 (Entertainment Permit) of the Development Code if said performances do not comply with the
exceptions listed in Section 17.16.170.
15. The on-site manager of the business shall take the required steps as determined necessary to ensure
the orderly conduct of employees, patrons, and visitors on the premises. This includes:
1. Monitoring of alcoholic beverage sales;
2. Handling of an obviously intoxicated person;
3. Establishing a reasonable ratio of employees to patrons based on activity level;
4. Monitoring security staff including the handling of patrons involved in arguments and fighting ;
5. Monitoring the outdoor areas including the parking lot;
6. Verifying age/checking identification of patrons including warning patrons reaching their drinking limit/potential
intoxication and refusing service;
7. Contacting law enforcement regarding observed or reported criminal activity.
16. No loitering shall take place outside of the business or within the general vicinity before, during, or after
the approved hours of operation.
17. Business operations must be conducted in a manner consistent with all applicable sections of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code. These include, but are not limited to, performance standards related to noise
(Section 17.66.050 Noise Standards) and lighting (Chapter 17.58 Outdoor Lighting Standards), as well as all other
applicable standards described in Section 17.66 and elsewhere in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
18. The business operations shall comply with the regulations and requirements of the California Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) that apply to a Type 23 ABC license (Small Beer Manufacturer).
19. The Director of Planning & Economic Development shall review business operations six (6) months after operations
have commenced. The purpose of the review is to ensure operations are being conducted in a manner consistent
with the project approval and corresponding conditions. This will include consulting with the San Bernardino County
Sheriff’s Department regarding calls for service, as well as discussions with other City Departments including but
not limited to, Community Improvement. The Director of Planning & Economic Development will also review of
business operations twelve (12) months after operations have commenced. This condition does not preclude the
City from at any time enforcing or investigating possible violations of any standard set forth in the City’s Development
Code.
Page 326
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
20. All structures and parking lot shall have a minimum lighting level as outlined in Chapter 17.58 (Outdoor Lighting
Standards) of the Development Code.
21. Approval is granted for one food vendor during regular operation hours and up to 3 food vendors during special
events. Each food vendor shall have a current and approved MFF (mobile food facility) license. Food vendors shall
be located in the parking lot adjacent to the brewery building and open area and shaded canopy. On-site food
vendors must maintain at all times valid licenses and permits, including but not limited to any associated with mobile
food preparation and service, as required by San Bernardino County Environmental Health Services or other
agencies.
22. Modifications to structures and the site’s parking lot will be reviewed under a separate Site Development Review
application. Minimum requirements for occupancy of the business and site, including those related to Building &
Safety, Fire Protection, parking, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will be provided at the time business
operations commence. Any request to defer site and building improvements, other than those required for
occupancy and operations to commence, will be done according to a plan approved by the Director. The applicant
must provide a proposed plan to the Director of Planning & Economic Development no later than ninety (90) days
from the date business operations commence. The plan will provide a phased approach to completing improvements
over a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date business operations officially commence.
23. All parking required pursuant to Chapter 17.64 (Parking and Loading Standards) of the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code will be maintained on-site at all times, including during any special event. Should the City
determine the subject use has created a parking issue, the City may initiate a permit parking district at no cost for the
adjacent residential neighborhood. The cost for that permit parking district formation and permits would be borne by
the applicant in perpetuity. Additionally, the applicant may be required to provide the City with a parking study, as well
as work with neighboring commercial locations, such as those on the west side of Archibald Avenue, to secure
additional off-site parking for business patrons.
24. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided
by the Planning & E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t Department. The signed Statement of Agreement
and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning and Economic
Development Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a
business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.
25. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims,
demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable,
declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but
not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively “Actions”), brought against
the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities
thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit
or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments,
agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or
concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085
or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision
of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and
expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident
to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City
Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and
satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such
suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that
the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the
City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City
Page 327
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging
the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the
litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into
an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
26. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption
fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors
and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date
of project approval.
27. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
28. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the
building of the use/activity that is approved by this Minor Use Permit; improvements including new building
construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is approved by this Minor Use Permit,
shall require the review and approval by the Planning and Economic Development Director prior to submittal
of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a
business license. The Planning and Economic Development Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of the use are in substantial compliance with this approval or require the submittal of an
application to modify this Minor Use Permit for review by the City.
29. A business operations letter must be submitted to the City for approval by the Planning & Economic Development
Director no later than submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy. The letter must include those measures
and conditions set forth in the project’s determination letter and these conditions of approval.
30. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance. Business operations must be conducted in a manner that is in substantial
compliance with the information on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Department of Planning & Economic
Development, the project’s determination letter, and these conditions of approval. If there is a discrepancy between
the associated materials on file with the City and either the subject project’s determination letter or the project’s
conditions of approval, the determination letter and the conditions supersede unless otherwise noted.
31. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal
Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
32. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out
of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,
berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family residential
developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
33. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
34. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the
number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
35. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any
signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application
and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. On-site signage will be required to be
installed at the eastern most driveway (off of Main Street) directing vehicular traffic to turn left when exiting the subject
Page 328
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
location.
36. If there is a discrepancy between the associated materials on file with the City and either the subject project’s
determination letter or the project’s conditions of approval, the determination letter and the conditions
supersede unless otherwise noted.
37. A land use entitlement or permit may be modified or revoked pursuant to Chapter 17.08 - Enforcement of the
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Gas detection is required in accordance with the Fire Code.
2. Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
3. A change of use/occupancy analysis is required to be submitted to the Building & Safety Department for
the evaluation of the proposed use in the existing building. Some of the issues that must be addressed include
(but are not limited to): Compliance with seismic requirements, Structural Importance Factor , ADA
accessibility and parking, allowable area ratios, area separation walls, maximum occupant loads , type of
doors, swing of doors, panic hardware, exit signs, emergency illumination, aisle widths, direct exiting, and
designation of a main exit.
4. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance
with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Fire
apparatus access will likely include the use of the existing parking lot. The parking lot will be required
to certified by a licensed engineer to be able to support the weight of fire apparatus as required by
Standard 5-1.
5. Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
6. Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial buildings
shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to
the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
7. Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
8. Storage of certain combustible commodities and/or business supplies in excess of threshold amounts
requires a permit from the Fire District. Please contact the Fire District at 909-477-2770 or RCFire@CityofRC.us
to discuss the storage operations for this business.
9. High-piled combustible storage, if any, is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code
and Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
10. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required
depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and
the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If
an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be
provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
11. One or more of the operations in use or proposed for this building /business requires a Fire Code
Operating Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
12. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler
Page 329
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 6 DRC 2023-00257
risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are
required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The
Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
Page 330
MAIN STREET
AR
C
H
I
B
A
L
D
B
L
V
D
8889 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
EXISTING SITE PLAN
Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"
October 31, 2023
P:\23\23340 - Rancho Cucamonga 8889 Archibald Hamilton
Brewery\Design\Site\x23340 - Site Plan.dwg
B I C K E L G R O U P
A R C H I T E C T U R E
BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED
3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m
ADDRESS:8889 ARCHIBALD AVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
91730-5226
APN:0209-062-01-0000
COUNTY:SAN BERNARDINO
PROPERTY USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
YEAR BUILT: 1958
NO. OF STORIES: 1
LOT SIZE:49,310 SQFT/1.13 ACRES
NO
R
T
H
(E) PARKING:
LOT NO.1: 11 SPACES
1 ACCESSIBLE SPACE
TOTAL: 12 SPACES
LOT NO.2: SPACES UNDEFINED
0 ACCESSIBLE SPACE
TOTAL: 0 SPACES
PROJECT
INFORMATION
GENERAL NOTE
x NO CHANGE IN IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
PROPOSED
PARKING
Page 331
MAIN STREET
AR
C
H
I
B
A
L
D
B
L
V
D
17
5
7
5
17
13
8889 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
INITIAL PHASE
Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"
October 31, 2023
B I C K E L G R O U P
A R C H I T E C T U R E
BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED
3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m
ADDRESS:8889 ARCHIBALD AVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
91730-5226
APN:0209-062-01-0000
COUNTY:SAN BERNARDINO
PROPERTY USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
YEAR BUILT: 1958
NO. OF STORIES: 1
LOT SIZE:49,310 SQFT/1.13 ACRES
PROJECT
INFORMATION
x NO CHANGE IN IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
PROPOSED
GENERAL NOTE
NO
R
T
H
PARKING REQUIRED: PER 17.65.050 TABLE 17.64.050-1
AS MODIFIED BY SECTION 17.64.050
BREWERY:
3,706 SQFT. GROSS
2,012 SQFT. EQUIPMENT/EXCEPTIONS
1,694 SQFT.
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING
= 2 SPACES/1,000 SF
§
2 PARKING SPACES
RESTAURANT/DINING:
3,706 SQFT. GROSS
607 SQFT. EXCEPTIONS
3,099 SQFT
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
RESTAURANT, BARS, AND NIGHT CLUBS
= 10 SPACES/1,000SF
; §
31 PARKING SPACES
OUTDOOR SEATING:
6,351 SQFT. GROSS
3,849 SQFT. EXCEPTIONS
2,505 SQFT
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
OUTDOOR
= 10 SPACES/1,000 SQFT
; §
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 59
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 64
61 STANDARD PARKING
3 ADA PARKING
2 - 9'X18' ACCESSIBLE STALL
1 - 12'X18' VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL
PARKING
ACCESSIBLE PATH
PAINTED DIRECTIONAL
ARROW
SYMBOL/LEGEND
Page 332
MAIN STREET
AR
C
H
I
B
A
L
D
B
L
V
D
6
2
22
20
7
5
8889 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
FINAL PHASE
Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"
December 6, 2023
B I C K E L G R O U P
A R C H I T E C T U R E
BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED
3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m
ADDRESS:8889 ARCHIBALD AVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
91730-5226
APN:0209-062-01-0000
COUNTY:SAN BERNARDINO
PROPERTY USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
YEAR BUILT: 1958
NO. OF STORIES: 1
LOT SIZE:49,310 SQFT/1.13 ACRES
PROJECT
INFORMATION
NO
R
T
H
PARKING REQUIRED: PER 17.65.050 TABLE 17.64.050-1
AS MODIFIED BY SECTION 17.64.050
BREWERY:
3,706 SQFT. GROSS
2,012 SQFT. EQUIPMENT/EXCEPTIONS
1,694 SQFT.
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING
= 2 SPACES/1,000 SF
§
2 PARKING SPACES
RESTAURANT/DINING:
3,706 SQFT. GROSS
607 SQFT. EXCEPTIONS
3,099 SQFT
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
RESTAURANT, BARS, AND NIGHT CLUBS
= 10 SPACES/1,000SF
; §
31 PARKING SPACES
OUTDOOR SEATING:
6,351 SQFT. GROSS
3,849 SQFT. EXCEPTIONS
2,505 SQFT
PER TABLE 17.64.050-1
OUTDOOR
= 10 SPACES/1,000 SQFT
; §
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 59
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 62
59 STANDARD PARKING
3 ADA PARKING
2 - 9'X18' ACCESSIBLE STALL
1 - 12'X18' VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL
PARKING
ACCESSIBLE PATH
PAINTED DIRECTIONAL
ARROW
SYMBOL/LEGEND
Page 333
8889 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
PROPOSED PLAN
October 31, 2023
P:\23\23340 - Rancho Cucamonga 8889 Archibald Hamilton
Brewery\Design\Floor Plan\x23340 - Floor Plan.dwg
B I C K E L G R O U P
A R C H I T E C T U R E
B I C K E L G R O U P I N C O R P O R A T E D
3 6 0 0 B I R C H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P : 9 4 9 .7 5 7 .0 4 1 1 F : 9 4 9 .7 5 7 .0 5 1 1
w w w .b i c k e l g r p .c o m
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Page 334
Page 335
Statement of Agreement and Acceptance
of Conditions of Approval for Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257
I, Joshua Hamilton, as the applicant(s) for the above referenced project number, hereby state that
I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Minor Use Permit DRC2023-
00257, for property located at 8889 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0209-062-10, Rancho Cucamonga,
California, as approved by the Planning & Economic Development Department on January 12,
202, and as listed below and attached.
Applicant Signature____________________________
Date ______________________________
Conditions of Approval
1. The applicant shall sign this Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of
Approval prior to the submittal of plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or
commencement of the approved activity indicating agreement with and acceptance of the
adopted Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan
check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.
2. All other conditions of approval related to Minor Use Permit DRC2023-00257.
Page 336
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
COMPLIANCE ORDER
HAMILTON ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
8889 ARCHIBALD AVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Case No: COD-2025-00239
RE: 8889 ARCHIBALD AVE
APN: 0209-062-01-0000
Dear Owner,December 4, 2025
As the listed property owner or responsible person for the above reference property, you are hereby notified an employee
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga inspected this property on December 4, 2025 at approximately 12:09 pm and
determined the following violations of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code exist:
Code Section: Corrective Action Required:Please Comply by:
RCMC 17.30.030(B)(3)
- Allowed land uses
and permit
requirements
Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed
through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In
addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed
herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to
establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by
other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements
identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit
Requirements by Base Zone) include: 3)- Conditionally permitted (C). A
land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the
designated zone upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the
designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable
provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as
state and federal law. **IMMEDIATELY CEASE THE UNAPPROVED
USE OF THE OUTDOOR AREA IN EXCESS OF THE 2,506 SQUARE
FOOT THRESHOLD APPROVED BY THE MINOR USE PERMIT #
DRC2023-00257. THIS ALSO INCLUDES ANY SEATING OR DINING
AREAS SET UP IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING WHICH ARE NOT
APPROVED BY THE MINOR USE PERMIT.
December 4, 2025
Failure to fully correct or make diligent effort toward correction of any listed violation shall result in an Administrative
Citation and fine. The penalty for each section violated shall be $100 for the first day of each violation, $200 for a second
day that each violation occurs within a 12-month period and $500 for a third or subsequent violation within a 12-month
period. For violations of Title 15, which includes any building and safety code, penalties shall be $100, $500 and $1,000,
respectively.
You will have the right to appeal any Administrative Citation issued by requesting a hearing within 30 days of the citation
being issued. Hearings may be requested online at www.CitationProcessingCenter.com; by mail at City of Rancho
Cucamonga, C/O Citation Processing Center, P.O. Box 7275, Newport Beach, CA 92658-7275; or in person at City Hall,
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. The administrative hearing will follow the procedure set forth in Chapter
1.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
Additionally, any violations of the Municipal Code are considered an infraction or misdemeanor offense which is separately
and concurrently chargeable as a criminal offense and subject to the penalties thereof.
If you have questions regarding this notice, please contact the Community Improvement office by phone or e-mail.
Thank you,
Matthew Gillespie, Senior Community Improvement Officer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Matthew.Gillespie@CityofRC.us, 909-774-2712
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 344
2025-12-17 – Item F1 - Regular City Council Meeting – Email with Video Received
Video Received:
From: Armando Moreno <mandomach5@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 3:46 PM
To: Marquez, Matt <Matt.Marquez@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Hamilton brewery
(Video Duration 00.07 seconds)
Video with audio of alarm stating: “Please leave the area, this area is under surveillance,
and you have been recorded.”
2025-12-17- Regular Meeting – Correspondence received for Item F1
From: julia espinoza <myquest4vida@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 2:13 PM
To: Marquez, Matt <Matt.Marquez@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Protesting Hamilton Brewery
*NOTE: Attached video submitted not viewable – Sender contacted by City Staff RE: Video Format
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
You don't often get email from myquest4vida@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important
I have plenty more if you need some.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for
2025-12-17 – Regular City Council Meeting – Item F1 – Additional Correspondence
From: Lizzie <lakerlizzie10@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2025 1:06:40 PM
To: Marquez, Matt <Matt.Marquez@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Antagonists Hamiltons Bar
Note – Video Provided
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
Hamilton’s brewery continues to be a nuisance to our community. There has been numerous incidents
and again with drunk drivers on our small streets. This is an accident waiting to happen. Do we need a
drunk driver to hit one of our community members? Our children? Our grandchildren are seniors who are
right next-door to the brewery Who puts a brewery in a residential area?!! I can’t help but feel that just
because we’re the Northtown area of Rancho Cucamonga the low income area with a gang injunction
that we are being discarded with our concerns and our fears! Does somebody need to get seriously hurt
for somebody to listen to us?
You don't often get email from lakerlizzie10@gmail.com. Learn why this is important
2025-12-17 – Regular City Council Meeting – Item F1 – Additional Correspondence
From: Julia Moreno Espinoza <myquest4vida@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 1:33 PM
To: Marquez, Matt <Matt.Marquez@cityofrc.us>
Subject: Protest of Hamilton Brewery
Hello Mr. Marquez, my name is Julia Espinoza and am writing this email so I can share my thoughts on this matter. When
we first received the first letter from the city we already knew what was going to happen in our quiet neighborhood since
we had seen how one of the largest breweries in Rancho Cucamonga was at it’s previous location, which we already knew
it was going to be a nightmare and the city didn’t care for our thoughts nor the fact that we didn’t want Hamilton Brewery
(a bar) in our peaceful neighborhood where our children used to be able to play outside and now they can’t due to the
fact that there’s too many people going back and forth trying to find a parking space. Mr Hamilton doesn’t care about the
people that live in the area nor his own patrons since he did not think about the parking situation that he was putting his
patrons inn. Now we the residents have to save our parking spots that we have been using for years and are constantly
letting people know and they call us names and flip us off. We are constantly calling the police when they park in a no
parking section due to it being in an area that the first responders need to park. It’s a 17 unit low income elderly
apartments. The city needs to do more to keep Mr. Hamilton from getting away with what ever he wants, I’m sending you
some videos of what goes on especially from Thursday to Sunday and let’s not forget Monday which is a day of football.
Absolute chaos everywhere and we hear it all very well since we live right across from the bar. Here are some pictures and
videos of what happens there.
Sent from my iPhone
REVIEW OF MINOR USE PERMIT DRC2023 -00257
HAMILTON FAMILY BREWERY
December 17, 2025
BACKGROUND
Resident
Concerns &
Direction from
City Manager
Staff
Investigation
Report to City
Council
•MUP Approved – January 2024
•Use includes – brewing facility, indoor seating area/retail area & bar, & outdoor seating area
•Minimum Parking Required – 59 spaces required, 63 provided
•Future parking lot improvements may necessitate loss of 2 spaces
•Hours – Sunday through Wednesday 12pm to 10pm
Thursday through Saturday 12pm to 12am
•Use of 2,506 sf of outdoor seating
•6 & 12-Month Director review of business operations
•6-month mark is in March 2026
•Owner can request to extend operation hours to 12am Sunday through Wednesday
BACKGROUND
First 6 months
STAFF INVESTIGATION
•CI staff conducting noise testing
•Review of calls for service
•Undercover Sheriff’s operation
•Engineering STOP sign installation analysis & related traffic
counts
•Correspondence with ABC & witnessing protest hearing
•Site visit
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
•Interim Operating Permit – issued by ABC
1.Application has been protested
2.ABC determined license should be issued
3.Applicant has filed a license application
•Protest hearing conducted on December 10th
•Decision expected in 1.5 to 2 months
•Next Steps:
•Continued communication w/ABC
•Obtain copies of hearing evidence
STAFF INVESTIGATION
PARKING & TRAFFIC
•Resident correspondence – parking enforcement, traffic safety speeding, residential parking district, etc.
•Existing signage – disrepair & incomplete
•Replacement of faded signs in cul-de-sac
•Installation of additional No Parking sign along south side of Main St.
•STOP sign analysis – Main & Reid
•Must meet warrants including average # of vehicles per hour – 66 vs 300 per hour
•Reported collisions w/in 12-month period – less than 5 reported w/in 12-month period
•Data does not show vehicles traveling over 40 mph
•Staff does not recommend
STAFF INVESTIGATION
PARKING & TRAFFIC
•Calls for Service
•16 parking violation calls
•2 – multiple citations issued for parking in No Parking zone
•1- parked in front of fire hydrant
•1 – vehicle tagged for 72-hr parking notice
•2 – vehicles blocking driveways
•Planning Condition 23 – if a parking issue is created, City may initiate parking district at no cost to residents
•Applicant may also be required to provide a parking study
•Staff has not determined that a parking issue has been created
•Parking District
•Staff provided resident with information on district formation
•Petition required – signed by at least 75% of residents w/in boundaries
•No more than 5 permits per residence
•Current costs - $10 first vehicle plus $2 for each additional 1 – vehicle tagged for 72-hr parking notice
STAFF INVESTIGATION
NOISE
•Noise Readings – taken along Main Street & immediately east
•No violations found
•Calls for Service
•6 noise - no action taken
•2 music disturbance – no action taken
•3 alarm noise – business owner reports fixing issue
STAFF INVESTIGATION
OUTDOOR SEATING
•MUP approval granted 2,506
sf
•Site Visit – determined that
additional space was being
used
•Compliance Order – issued on
December 4th
•Follow Up Inspection Results
– Compliance
Next Steps
•Continue to review concerns & collect related data.
•Sheriff Department personnel will continue to respond & investigate calls for service.
•City staff to conduct site visits as part of the review of business operations.
•Staff will continue to accept copies of video, audio, or pictures related to community concerns.
•City staff will continue noise testing.
•City staff will request copies of evidence & records related to the protest submitted to ABC & its related
protest hearing.
•City staff will conduct the required 6- & 12-month reviews.
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager, Community Development
Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a General
Plan Amendment to Amend the General Plan Land Use and Community
Character Chapter related to Floor Area Ratio on Table LC-1 and
Policies Relating to Block Lengths; Amend the General Plan Mobility and
Access Chapter to add Dimension Standards for Street Typologies,
Remove the Proposed 8th Street Trail and Amend the Truck Routes Map
Pursuant to AB98; and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinances
1053 and 1054 to be Read by Title Only to Amend Municipal Code Table
17.130.050-1 to Update Floor Area Ratio and Ground Floor Use
Regulations for Form Based Zones and Amend Municipal Code Section
17.138.030 Regarding Block Length for Form Based Zones and Amend
Municipal Code Section 10.56.020 to Alter Truck Routes. An Addendum
to the General Plan EIR Has Been Prepared for this Project.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2025-102 AND ORDINANCE NOS. 1053 AND
1054) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to amend the
General Plan Land Use and Community Character and Mobility Chapters and conduct first
reading of Ordinances 1053 and 1054 to be read by title only and waive full reading to amend the
Municipal Code in conformance with the amendments to the General Plan.
BACKGROUND:
On December 15, 2021, the City Council adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The City Council initiated this update process, referred to as PlanRC, to be compliant
with changes in state law and to build on our success as a world class community to create a
balanced, vibrant and innovative city. This comprehensive General Plan Update addressed issues
and challenges facing the City, including diversifying employment opportunities, expanding
housing and mobility choice and preserving the character, history, and quality of life that make
Rancho Cucamonga a special place to live. The updated General Plan advances the City’s vision
for a sustainable, resilient, equitable and healthy community.
The Land Use and Community Character chapter of the General Plan designates the proposed
general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry,
open space, including agriculture, natural resources, and public buildings and grounds, among
other categories of public and private uses of land. The chapter is required to include a statement
Page 345
Page 2
3
2
3
7
of the standards of population density and building intensity recommended for the various districts
and other territory covered by the plan. The Land Use and Community Character chapter
specifically describes and defines the distinct types of places or “place types” that the City aims
to create to achieve the community’s vision. Place types such as “Neighborhoods”, “Corridors”,
and “Centers” are then utilized to derive the more specific land use designations for each area of
the city, ranging from “Semi-Rural Neighborhood” to “City Center”. Each of these land use
designations is then further defined by a residential density range, a non-residential intensity, and
a target use mix ratio (the mix of residential and non-residential) that will define future
development in each area.
The Mobility and Access chapter of the General Plan identifies existing and proposed major
thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities, all correlated with
the Land Use and Community Character element of the General Plan. State law stipulates that
the city must plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all
users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel. The Mobility and Access
Element states that roads be designed to include people who are not in automobiles and provide
the opportunity for walking, biking, or taking public transit. To plan for and eventually effectuate
complete streets throughout the city, the Element identifies road typologies with their associated
priority modes of travel, such as a freeway or a local street while providing cross sections of each
type while identifying strategies for complete streets. In addition, the Mobility and Access chapter
includes a Truck Routes map which restricts truck traffic on city streets to specific routes that are
designated for trucks over three tons. These truck routes help to facilitate the movement of goods
throughout the city, while providing a connection between major freeway facilities to local
roadways.
ANALYSIS:
Land Use and Community Character Amendments
The first proposed amendment to the Land Use and Community Character chapter is to change
one of the columns in Table LC-1 (General Plan Designations) from “Non-Residential Intensity
(FAR)” to “Target Non-Residential Intensity (FAR)” as well as the subsequent references
throughout the Land Use and Community Character chapter. This proposed amendment was
born out of a need to clarify the intent of the non-residential intensity ranges established for each
land use designation, establishing them as targets rather than mandates for all new developments
within each designation. Since the adoption of the General Plan, very few, if any, proposed
developments have been able to achieve the amount Non-Residential Intensity (FAR) required
per their associated Land Use Designation. The combination of a burdensome requirement and
the current economic environment have led to virtually no proposed developments including the
minimum required amount of non-residential floor area and utilizing provision such as State
Density Bonus law to avoid the requirement. The proposed change in language to “Target Non-
Residential Intensity (FAR)” will position this standard as an intended target rather than a
mandate, providing more flexibility for new developments particularly in the high-intensity
development areas of the city.
This proposed amendment requires a similar amendment to the Development Code for regulatory
continuity. Specifically, Table 17.130.050-1 requires a change from “Non-Residential Intensity
(FAR) (min./max.)” to “Target Nonresidential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (min./max.)”. While the
amount of Non-Residential Intensity per zoning district will no longer be a requirement, including
this standard within the Development Code still indicates the vision and intent of the General Plan
for the desired amount of commercial and/or retail development in each zoning district.
Page 346
Page 3
3
2
3
7
The second proposed amendment is a text update to Policy LC-2.6 to include more specific
location requirements for new developments in which the ground floor must be a minimum 15 feet
floor to floor height in non-residential or mixed-use areas. The policy amendment will further clarify
the location where ground floors must be designed for commercial and/or retail spaces in new
development projects within non-residential and mixed-use area, specifically Foothill Boulevard
and Haven Avenue (south of Church Street and north of Jersey Boulevard). This clarification will
limit the areas of the city in which ground floor non-residential space is required for all new
developments and ensures that those spaces are built to the general specifications of leasable
commercial/retail spaces to further enhance the city’s economic vitality along its busiest corridors
as well as enhance the pedestrian experience.
To provide further clarity on ground floor commercial space, two amendments are proposed. First,
staff proposes to consolidate Section 17.130.040.B to clarify that any area with a corridor fronting
commercial, retail or non-residential use overlay can allow any allowed non-residential use on the
ground floor. Second, an amendment to the Development Code adds language to footnote #2 of
Table 17.130.050-1 within the Development Code. The proposed language states, “Ground floor
project amenity spaces associated with the on-site residential use (ex. Leasing office, community
space, gym for residents, etc.) shall be limited to a maximum of 30% of the non-residential ground
floor frontage.” This amendment would specify the amount of ground floor frontage area that can
be dedicated to non-residential amenity spaces to ensure such uses do not make up the entirety
of ground floor areas and most of the ground floor area will be dedicated to commercial/retail
space, further achieving the goal of creating mixed-use developments and fostering a pedestrian
environment.
The third proposed amendment is a new policy within “Goal LC-2 HUMAN SCALED. A city
planned and designed for people fostering social and economic interaction, an active and vital
public realm, and high levels of public safety and comfort.” The proposed policy states, “LC-2.12
Block Length. For all designations other than neighborhoods, require blocks be designed no
longer than 600 feet nor a perimeter exceeding 1,800 feet. Exceptions within 10% can be made
at the discretion of the City to align new streets with existing streets.” This proposed policy aligns
with policy LC-4.6 which includes the same block dimensions but also provides flexibility in
allowing for exceptions within 10% to ensure proper alignment between new streets and existing
streets thereby achieving the goal of designing for a safe and active human-scaled pedestrian
realm.
This proposed amendment requires a similar amendment to the Development Code for regulatory
continuity. Specifically, Table 17.138.030-1 requires changes to the maximum Block Face Length
and Perimeter dimensions for zones CE1, ME1, ME2, CO1, CO2, and CE2 to be consistent with
the maximums proposed in the General Plan amendment. The stated zones will all have the same
maximum block face length of 600 feet and maximum perimeter of 1,800 feet.
The fourth proposed amendment adds language to policy L-2.10. Policy LC-2.10 Pedestrian-
Oriented Auto-Dependent Uses currently states, “Require auto dependent uses such as drive-
throughs, car washes, automobile service stations, and similar auto-focused businesses, to be
designed with buildings oriented toward the primary street and the auto-servicing use/activity in
the rear. Prohibit auto-dependent uses from locating in pedestrian-priority environments, such as
City Centers, Traditional Town centers, and all Neighborhoods.” The amendment would add “…or
on streets that prioritize pedestrians” at the end of the sentence to broaden the prohibition of auto-
dependent uses locating within pedestrian-priority environments. This amendment seeks to
further implement Goal LC-2, stated above, by creating and fostering a safe and active public
realm that would otherwise be intruded by auto-dependent uses.
Page 347
Page 4
3
2
3
7
Lastly, the final amendment to the Land Use and Community Character chapter is regarding the
8th street trail, a proposed multi-modal trail adjacent to the existing Metrolink tracks designed to
connect the Cucamonga Town Center to Cucamonga Station. The Engineering Services
Department conducted a feasibility analysis of all new trail connections shown in the General Plan
to plan for future trail development. In this analysis, it was determined that the 8th Street trail would
only be feasible west of Haven Avenue. Development east of Haven Avenue precludes any
potential acquisition of land for the trail to connect it to Cucamonga Station. Staff determined that
a cost effect alternative would be to focus existing circulation infrastructure in the area to allow for
multimodal use to create these connections. The proposed changes would remove references to
8th street and the 8th street trail from Focus Areas 1 (Downtown Cucamonga), 3 (HART District),
5 (Cucamonga Town Center), and 8 (Southeast Industrial Area) as well as an action item to create
a multi-purpose trail along the historic 8th Street right of way from the work plan (Volume 4,
Chapter 1).
Mobility and Access Amendments
In response to numerous development applications along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue,
City staff has identified a need to establish specific configuration, dimension, and design
requirements for the Boulevard roadway typology described within the Mobility and Access
chapter not only for future development applications but also taking into account the future
development of the planned Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lines, as part of the Omnitrans West Valley
Connector, along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The design drawings provide a corridor
configuration which would accommodate the future BRT service before full implementation of the
BRT service. These new page additions to the Mobility and Access chapter include scaled
drawings for Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue with and without BRT
lanes and Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to 7th Street. Other additional minor text
amendments include adding a maximum right-of-way of 120 feet for the Arterial Roadway
typology, a maximum right-of-way of 88 feet for the Collector Street typology, a maximum right-
of-way of 100 feet for the Bicycle Corridor typology, a maximum right-of-way of 16 feet for a Multi-
Use Trail typology, and a maximum right-of-way of 60 feet for a Local Street/Thoroughfare
typology. Adding dimensions for each of the roadway typologies provides additional direction
when such roadways are being installed and ensures they are appropriately designed per their
specifications.
In addition, in accordance with Assembly Bill 98 (AB98), the Truck Routes map is being updated
to reflect changes in goods movement patterns within the city. AB98 mandates that agencies
evaluate the presence of sensitive receptors, such as schools, residential neighborhoods,
childcare facilities, hospitals, healthcare or assisted living facilities and parks and playgrounds.
and residential areas, in the designation or modification of truck routes.
According to an analysis conducted for the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Fehr & Peers (Exhibit
A), given the location of industrial and logistics areas that necessitate direct truck access, it is not
feasible to completely avoid sensitive receptors while maintaining goods movement connections
in the city. Combined as one corridor, Vineyard Avenue and Carnelian Street are directly adjacent
(within 100 feet) to sensitive receptors along approximately 73% of their total truck route length.
To limit impacts to sensitive receptors, the updated Truck Routes map (Figure M-9) removes the
current designated truck route on Carnelian Street south of SR 210 as it curves and turns into
Vineyard Avenue south to Foothill Boulevard. This is expected to shift freight movement from
Carnelian to Archibald Avenue as the closest designated truck route. The proposed changes
consolidate freight activity rather than expanding the overall footprint of truck-adjacent sensitive
Page 348
Page 5
3
2
3
7
receptors in the city.
To ensure consistency with the proposed General Plan amendment to the truck routes map in
compliance with AB98, an amendment to Section 10.56.020 of the Municipal Code is also
required to update the change. This text amendment removes Carnelian Street south of SR 210
and Vinyard north of Foothill Boulevard as designated truck routes.
Finally, we took the opportunity to make minor text edits to the General Plan Mobility chapter to
integrate the recently adopted Connect RC Active Transportation Plan (new Figure M-4B),
updated planned at grade and grade separated crossings in the southeast industrial area (Figure
M-8) and updated goals and policies to support the implementation of AB 960, to integrate Federal
Highway Administration standards and prioritize safety projects in the city (Goal MA-3, Policies
MA-3.2 and MA-3.5).
Planning Commission
These amendments were reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2025 at an
advertised public hearing. No public comment was provided. Staff answered clarifying questions
regarding the proposed amendments. Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution
recommending approval of the proposed General Plan and Municipal Code (title 17)
amendments. The signed resolution and meeting minutes are included as attachments to this
report.
Environmental Analysis
As part of the General Plan update in December 2021, the City Council certified the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15164, the City has reviewed the proposed General Plan and Development Code
amendments against the General Plan EIR and determined the EIR adequately addresses all the
environmental issues associated with the project. The proposed project would not result in any
new significant impacts on the environment based upon the analysis and conclusions presented
in the General Plan EIR. Finally, no new feasible mitigation measures have been identified that
would substantially reduce significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, staff
has prepared an EIR Addendum for the General Plan amendments and associated Municipal
Code amendments. Unlike an EIR, an Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review.
Correspondence
SB 18 requires local (city and county) governments to consult with California Native American
tribes to aid in the protection of traditional tribal cultural places ("cultural places") through local
land use planning. Letters were sent to local tribes on August 29, 2024 and tribes were provided
90 days to respond to request consultation. Questions were received from the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians. Staff responded to their inquiries and the tribe closed consultation. No other
tribes responded requesting consultation or clarification. This item was advertised with an 1/8th
page ad in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on December 5, 2025. Because this item is citywide,
no individual notices were sent.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
These amendments address multiple Council core values, including relentless pursuit of
improvement, actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input and working together
Page 349
Page 6
3
2
3
7
cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff and all stakeholders by addressing
unintended consequences of language in the documents, creating additional clarity for
development to meet the intended vision of the General Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-040 and 2025-041
Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, November 12, 2025 (Item D2)
Attachment 3 – EIR Addendum
Attachment 4 – Resolution 2025-102
Attachment 5 – Ordinance No. 1053
Attachment 6 – Ordinance No. 1054
Page 350
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 1 of 6
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission
Agenda
November 12, 2025
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on
November 12, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:03 p.m.
A.Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp,
Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director; Sean
McPherson, Principal Planner; Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer; Jared Knight, Assistant Planner;
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B.Public Communications
Chairman Morales opened the public communications.
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications.
C.Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 22, 2025.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
D. Public Hearings
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DESIGN REVIEW, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – CP
LOGISTICS VINEYARD, LLC – A Recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to allow for the
development of three (3) concrete tilt-up industrial buildings totaling approximately 982,096 square feet on
approximately 45.96 net acres bound by Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue
to the west, and the BNSF/Metrolink railroad line to the south; APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -
94, -96, -97. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was prepared for the project. Primary
Case File No. DRC2019-00742.
Principal Planner McPherson provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that the draft
resolution contained grammatical errors which included incomplete APN references. In addition, the title of the
Conditions of Approval was amended. No other changes were made aside from the title block. Commissioners
received a redlined version of the changes on the dais for review.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 357
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 2 of 6
Applicant Sizemore was present and available to answer questions.
The following individuals spoke in support of the project: Wyatt Stiles, Amy Smith, Eddie Campos, Louie
Lopez, Steven Salazar, and Robert, also known as ”Maddog”.
The following individuals expressed questions about the project: Felicia Zhu and Dick Takemoto. Their
concerns included:
• Noise and suggested to install a 10-12 feet block wall to mitigate it
• Privacy
• Pollution
• Type of manufacturing business proposed
• Traffic
• School children’s safety
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation of the
agenda packet and the following comments are noted. The actual correspondence should be referred to
for details:
• Email from Advocates for the Environment, withdrawing their comment letters, indicating they no
longer oppose the project.
• Email from Judy Summers expressing truck traffic and safety concerns for the school children.
• Email and a hard copy from Steven Piepkorn with Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance,
expressing environmental concerns and requesting that a new Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
be drafted and circulated. This correspondence also included a letter previously provided as part
of the FEIR process from Gary Ho with Blum, Collins & Ho, LLP, on behalf of Golden State
Environmental Justice Alliance dated August 2, 2024.
Applicant provided an explanation on the following:
• Block wall – The City’s development code allows a maximum wall height of 8 ft.; however, a minor
exception permits a height of up to 10 ft. Staff would have to review a request for a minor exception
separately since it is not part of the project application, which the developer intends to pursue at a
later date.
• Noise – stating that the proposed screen wall will diminish the sound.
• Type of business proposed – Does not have an end user.
• Traffic – Installation of traffic signals at 8th and Baker and other traffic improvements is expected to
minimize traffic concerns and reduce congestion.
Commissioner Dopp stated that his contention with projects like this is that trucks need to get to the freeway
the quickest route accessible and going north is prohibited by the city in numerous ways. It creates undue
burdens. He said the preferred method is south. He asked how developer intends to prevent trucks from
going into the northern parts of the city where it is more residential.
Applicant answered that it is 5-mile stretch to go through stop sign-controlled intersections through very
narrow roadways. He said they have a truck routing plan, and tenants are on a tight schedule as they want
their goods dropped off fast. He said along the northernly bounds they are improving Vineyard/Arrow and
Foothill Blvd. with a single authorization which will make things better. In terms of the restriction on
northbound traffic, he does not have the ability to control it.
Commissioner Dopp stated that from a general understanding, warehouses still have a big impact on
neighborhoods, particularly in the southwest part of the city. He mentioned to the applicant that the EIR
expressed alternate avenues for development outside of just pure warehouses. He is not convinced that
the warehouse furthest to the west is not going to have a negative impact on the quality of life to the
residents in those neighborhoods. He asked the applicant if there was any consideration to do something
other than a warehouse, as opposed to making all three buildings warehouse developments.
Applicant responded that it seemed to be the most efficient layout, and it made more sense to them than
other layouts. They did everything they could within reason to produce a good project that is as low of an
impact as possible given the location to the neighbors.
Page 358
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 3 of 6
Commissioner Daniels asked the applicant whether the public art funds allocated for renovating the 1-acre
property would be sufficient for their proposed plans.
Applicant confirmed.
Vice Chairman Boling referred to the submitted comments and requested clarification for the benefit of the
public and future readers of the minutes, on one issue: the visibility of the truck docks and bays from the
street.
Applicant explained that at street level, there is an 8-foot wall which was the maximum allowed. As the site
slopes to the south, additional grade lowers the truck docks below both street level and the base of the wall,
resulting in no visibility of the trucks.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing.
Commissioner Dopp expressed that he has a problem with warehouse projects being close to residential
areas due to their potential impact. He expressed his opinion regarding logistic jobs versus manufacturing,
or strong blue-collar jobs, expressing that in the long-term, these tend to be lower wage jobs. He expressed
concern that 9th Street may struggle to accommodate the traffic. He noted that given the zoning, his primary
concern is Building 3, which is closest to the residential area. He appreciates the community development
fee but if this project does go forward to Council, he has a question about why $5 million dollars would be
enough to mitigate some of the harm to the southwest community.
He also expressed that he likes what they did with the Baker House. The more that can be done for historic
preservation, the stronger the benefit in the long term. Commissioner Dopp then expressed that he was
unsure how he might vote.
Commissioner Daniels stated that these projects are always somewhat difficult because the zoning has
been there for approximately 45 years. There are a lot of residential homes in the area, and he believes
the developer tried to mitigate it as much as possible. He commended the developer for doing the
conditional use permit upfront. He questioned Development Agreement Section 11.E, specifically the in-
lieu fee. He expressed that they did a very good job with the architect, but questions continue to come up
relating to traffic. He asked Engineering staff for an explanation as to why 9th and Vineyard was not
indicated in the traffic study.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor answered that based on the study of the traffic impact analysis, the two
intersections to be optimized is Vineyard/Foothill and Vineyard/Arrow, but Vineyard/9th is not indicated due
to some of the re-stripping that will take place at that intersection where trucks will be going south and not
necessarily north.
Commissioner Daniels stated that because of the zoning, the developer did a very good job mitigating any
impacts. Although, it is unfortunate, there is residential around the project. He commends the developer
for the job they have done and the time it has taken. He expressed his support.
Commissioner Diaz concurred with the other Commissioners that warehouse projects tend to be difficult
due to their negative impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, particularly residential areas, however, it is
zoned properly, and it complies with everything it needs to comply with. There have been comments made
about working close to home. She told the developer that it is important to the community that the jobs
these tenants are providing are sustainable wages for people to be able to live in this community. One of
the positive impacts of this development is that we can have people work close to home and create an even
more positive impact in that neighborhood.
Vice Chairman Boling highlighted that in the Conditions of Approval, Building and Safety’s number one
condition calls out for connection on the three developed parcels. He asked if Baker House is on sewer.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor answered that he is not certain at this time.
Page 359
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 4 of 6
Vice Chairman Boling mentioned that if it is not, he suggests getting it put on sewer before the city takes
possession of the property. He said that this is an interesting site we have within the project boundaries
proposed, industrial, as well as business park, and residential. This is the typical interface we like to see
where the residential is right next to a business park, which has been successful, and businesses there
have been flourishing. The developer has done a good job in stepping down the magnitude of the buildings
as it approaches the residential area. He commended the applicant for doing the best he can in pushing
truck traffic in one direction away from the residential neighborhoods. The geography of where we are
located, with its proximity to the freeways, major rail lines, and international airport almost forces us to
consider projects like this because of the major infrastructure the region has invested in. There are
concerns where it is placed but the need for development like this exists and they have done a good job
with the concerns of the community.
He asked for clarification earlier with regard to the truck dock and bays for a specific purpose, in reference
to the letter received from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and there were several assertions
in that letter with reference to CEQA concerns. In this public hearing tonight, we have identified that at
least one of those assertions was a falsehood at their assertion that the truck bay is visible from the street,
which does not exist. He wanted those in the audience to understand that people can assert anything but
what is important is to have the facts to back it up and often times, organizations like that do not have the
facts to back up their assertions or statements. He expressed that the architecture looks great. The project
fits in and elevates the surrounding community, as it pertains to the business park, as well as the larger
buildings to the north. He hopes they get the right tenants there at the right time.
Principal Planner McPherson mentioned that in regard to utility connections, Engineering Condition
Approval number 30 requires separate utility services to each parcel, including sanitary sewer systems.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that given that, Building and Safety’s requirement for all three developed
parcels to connect to the public sewer appears redundant, as the same requirement is already addressed
in Engineering conditions 29 and 30.
Principal Planner Confirmed.
Chairman Morales thanked the developer for working with staff to come up with the best development
possible for that piece of land. He thanked them for being a responsible developer committed to hiring
skilled labor. Also, he liked the Baker House restoration as a community benefit because he is sure they
will use it in the future. He is in support of the project.
Commissioner Dopp stated that there was a discussion regarding a minor exception for a 10-feet wall
adjacent to Building 3 on the north side. He asked staff when the appropriate time would be to bring it up.
Planning Director Nakamura replied that the minor exception is a separate entitlement and is assigned at
the administrative level. She does not think it would be appropriate for the Commission to require them to
apply for a minor exception because it has not been reviewed for the necessary conditions. She said it
would be best to allow the developer and staff to better understand what the final needs are in order to
make the wall work for everyone involved. She said we do not want to guarantee approval on something
that has not yet been fully evaluated.
Commissioner Daniels asked to confirm that an 8-foot wall is what is being proposed tonight.
Principal Planner confirmed.
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution 2025-039
recommending that to City Council approve Design Review DRC2019-00742, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM20173, Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 and Development Agreement DRC2022-00266,
as amended in the resolution and the conditions of approval. Motion carried, 4-1, with Commissioner Dopp
voting no.
Page 360
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 5 of 6
D2. Consideration of a General Plan Amendment and Municipal Code Amendment to Amend the General
Plan Land Use and Community Character Chapter related to Floor Area Ratio on Table LC-1 and Policies
Relating to Block Lengths; Amend the General Plan Mobility and Access Chapter to add Dimension
Standards for Street Typologies, Remove the Proposed 8th Street Trail and Amend the Truck Routes Map
Pursuant to AB98; Amend Municipal Code Table 17.130.050-1 to Update Floor Area Ratio and Ground
Floor Use Regulations for Form Based Zones; and Amend Municipal Code Section 17.138.030 Regarding
Block Length for Form Based Zones. An Addendum to the General Plan EIR Has Been Prepared for this
Project. This item will be forwarded to City Council for Final Action. Continued from the October 22, 2025,
Planning Commission Meeting (DRC2025-00255, DRC2025-00256).
Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Daniels mentioned that with eliminating the mandate for the Floor Area Ratio, he believes the
developer will not comply if it is not mandated.
Planning Director Nakamura mentioned we would have a dimensional standard for what that ground floor has
to be. The developer can always do more than what would be proposed and required under these standards.
She reiterated that this is a floor, not a ceiling, that is being proposed.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that by eliminating the requirement and categorizing it as a target, if the City later
finds that developers are not coming close to meeting that target, nothing will prevent the City from taking the
same steps it is taking now–amending the code-to revise the target or ultimately establish a hard minimum.
Planning Director Nakamura confirmed and said this is just to get back to what it originally was intended to be.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned as a follow-up that for some of the more intensive uses on the matrix, the real
problem for him is that he understands the argument, he has seen time and time again that these housing
developers of these housing projects will waive it away if they do not want to do it
Planning Director Nakamura asked him to clarify what he is expecting to see in some of those environments that
would be different that would create these community buildings.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned the city center or city corridor is more intensive. These are parcels in the
General Plan where the city said we want higher quality development. Therefore, the floor area ratios need to
be very high to support a mix of retail, commercial, restaurant use, and maybe office space.
Planning Director Nakamura clarified that it is required in any of the center or corridor designations, regardless
of whether it is off of Foothill and Haven.
Commissioner Dopp stated that he still believes, even with the ground floor requirements, that we will not come
anywhere near those Floor Area Ratio targets for those specific zones.
Planning Director Nakamura provided an example of the city center parcel.
Commissioner Diaz asked if we reduce the floor area ratio to what it is now, can a developer still use density
bonus law to do all the things they want to do.
Planning Director Nakamura answered that they can always use state bonus density law to waive certain
standards.
Chairman Morales reopened the public hearing.
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing.
Page 361
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 6 of 6
Commissioner Dopp stated the biggest discussion seen from the Commission is what the intended target
is. At the end of the day, he understands that we have seen a lot of projects that involve some parts of that
metric. For him, the biggest thing about this specific amendment is that he does not think we could lose
that tool as a strategy for some of these developments. If we are going to use ground floor non-residential
as a strategy, his recommendation would be to continue to encourage mixed-use in these areas, take a
second look at some of the corridor centers, and maybe extend the language beyond just Foothill and
Haven.
Planning Director Nakamura, due to a possible misunderstanding, clarified that this is not a strategy but an actual
requirement that is going to be required by code. She explained that the corridor fronting retail requirement is an
actual linear designation on the zoning map, applicable to Foothill and Haven. What it did is break up where
they wanted retail only on the corners and then any other non-commercial could be further away from the
corners, and that is being collapsed so it could be any sort of commercial use because it was becoming far too
complicated for everybody to program it that way. She said the 15-foot minimum ground floor requirement
applies not only to Foothill and Haven, but to all corridor designations and all center designations.
Chairman Morales stated that the changes are positive and reflecting public input received over the years.
He noted that it has often been challenging to fill the ground-floor spaces. He expressed support for
considering preparations for bus rapid transit options as they arise.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution 2025-040
and 2025-041 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Municipal Code Amendments. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. Director Announcements
Planning Director Nakamura mentioned that there will not be a second meeting in November and that the
Commission will reconvene in December.
F. Commission Announcements - None
G. Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling, seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adjourn the meeting.
Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department
Approved:
Page 362
October 2025 | General Plan EIR Addendum
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR
SCH No. 2021050261
FOR THE
2025 GENERAL PLAN and
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared by:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact: Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga,
CA 91730
909.477.2750
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 363
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
1.1 BACKGROUND
This document serves as the environmental documentation for the City’s update to its
Development Code (proposed project) to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan. This
addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified in December 2021
(State Clearinghouse No. 2021050261), demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR
adequately addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the
proposed project and that none of the conditions described in the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162, exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or
negative declaration is not necessary.
1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), an addendum shall be prepared if some changes
or additions to a previously adopted EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated
in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR
have occurred. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative
Declarations):
When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no
subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines,
on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of
the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or
negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
EIR was certified as complete or negative declaration was adopted, shows any of
the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
Page 364
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure
or alternative; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects requiring major revisions to the General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the
substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a
subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate
environmental document to address changes to the project.
As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR):
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a
previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor
technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or
negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or
attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or
adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to
Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead
agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation
must be supported by substantial evidence.
A copy of this addendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730.
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The intent of the project is to make minor updates to General Plan policies, diagrams and maps
to clarify information as well as update the Development Code to ensure consistency with the
changes proposed to the General Plan. The key amendments to the General Plan and
Page 365
Development Code are described below.
1. General Plan Land Use and Community Character (Volume 2) Changes
a. Change from “Non-Residential Intensity (FAR)” to “Target Non-Residential Intensity
(FAR)”:
Proposed amendments to Tables LC-1, LC-2, LC-3, LC-4, and LC-5 clarify that
nonresidential intensity (FAR) is a target for the land use districts, not a mandate
for each individual parcel. This was explained on page 62 of Volume 2 of the
General Plan, the lack of the word “Target” on the tables led to confusion and
misinterpretation.
b. Update Policy LC-2.6 for ground floor non-residential uses in mixed use developments:
This amendment clarifies objective height standards, rather than FAR, for first floor
non-residential uses. This establishes the standards that can meet the “Target
Nonresidential Floor Area Ratio” for the designation. This implements the non-
residential portion of a mixed-use development.
c. Add a new policy to Goal LC-2 regarding block length:
The proposed policy states, “LC-2.12 Block Length. For all designations other than
Neighborhoods, require blocks be designed no longer than 600 feet nor a perimeter
exceeding 1,800 feet. Exceptions within 10% can be made at the discretion of the
City to align new streets with existing streets.” This proposed policy aligns with
policy LC-4.6 which includes the same block dimensions but also provides flexibility
in allowing for exceptions within 10% to ensure proper alignment between new
streets and existing streets thereby achieving the goal of designing for a safe and
active human-scaled pedestrian realm.
d. Modify Policy LC-2.10 for auto dependent uses:
Policy LC-2.10 Pedestrian-Oriented Auto-Dependent Uses currently states,
“Require auto dependent uses such as drive-throughs, car washes, automobile
service stations, and similar auto-focused businesses, to be designed with buildings
oriented toward the primary street and the auto-servicing use/activity in the rear.
Prohibit auto-dependent uses from locating in pedestrian-priority environments,
such as City Centers, Traditional Town centers, and all Neighborhoods.” The
amendment would add “…or on streets that prioritize pedestrians” at the end of the
sentence to broaden the prohibition of auto-dependent uses locating within
pedestrian-priority environments. This amendment seeks to further implement Goal
LC-2, stated above, by creating and fostering a safe and active public realm that
would otherwise be intruded by auto-dependent uses.
2. General Plan Mobility and Access (Volume 2) Changes
a. Addition of BRT and frontage lane layouts for Foothill and Haven:
These layouts provide objective standards for the desired frontage lane that is
articulated in the General Plan.
b. Addition of dimensional standards for all roadway typologies:
Adding objective standards for the roadway typologies provides clarity for future
development to meet the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Page 366
c. Updated Truck Routes Map:
This amendment, required by AB 98, updates the truck routes map to reflect
changes in goods movements patterns within the city to remove two truck routes to
consolidate freight activity and reduce freight movement from sensitive receptors in
the City.
3. Development Code Changes for Consistency with the Changes to the General Plan
a. Amendment to Table 17.130.050-1 (xxx) in Chapter 17.130 of Article XXX (Form
Based Code):
This will amend the table to clarify to remove non-residential FAR from the table as
a parcel level development standard and update ground floor non-residential height
dimensions consistent with the amended language in the General Plan.
b. Amendment to Section 17.138.030 (xxx) in Chapter 17.138 of Article XXX (Form Based
Code):
This will amend the block length standards consistent with the amended language
in the General Plan.
2. Findings
The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas,
open space, mobility and access, housing, public facilities and services, resource conservation,
safety, and noise. The General Plan EIR included Standard Conditions of Approval (See
Chapter 4 Implementation) for the following environmental topics: aesthetics, air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire.
The policies of the General Plan and the City’s existing development standards apply to all
development in the General Plan Planning Area and would continue following adoption of the
proposed project. As indicated above, the project is designed to enhance clarity of the General
Plan, meet the requirements of AB 98 and update the code to be consistent with the changes
proposed in the General Plan Amendment.
The General Plan EIR considered land use designations and the general pattern of future
development. While the Development Code is not specifically evaluated in the General Plan
EIR, state law requires that land use and zoning be consistent. The General Plan EIR included
policy changes as well as an update to the Development Code, which included zoning updates.
Overall, the proposed revisions to the Development Code are minor in nature and are required
to ensure consistency with the recently adopted General Plan, any physical impacts associated
with the rezoning of parcels are addressed through the City’s General Plan Implementation
Chapter, zoning, and development standards. For these reasons, the proposed project would
not change the conclusions of the General Plan EIR.
The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the
project.
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major
Page 367
revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects
or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The proposed project would better clarify the intent of the General Plan, eliminate truck
routes from sensitive receptors and align the Development Code with the recently adopted
General Plan; therefore, the proposed revisions to the General Plan and Development Code
are consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR and adopted by
the City. Consequently, the changes to the General Plan and Development Code would not
change the conclusions of the EIR.
2. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
The General Plan Update anticipated the need to amend the Development Code to
implement the goals and policies adopted by the City. The General Plan EIR relies upon the
Implementation Measures included in the General Plan to regulate all future development.
These Measures will continue to apply to all development in the City and will have the same
mitigating effects as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Because these changes are a result
of the Development Code review anticipated by the General Plan Update, there is no new
information that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General
Plan EIR was certified. The impacts from the proposed project would be the same as those
disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that significant effects
previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous
EIR.
The proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed in the
General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions of Approval identified
in the General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new
development. These policies would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the
General Plan EIR. The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the
recently adopted General Plan, and therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan EIR. There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant
effects examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General
Plan EIR. Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan would be
required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis.
4. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Page 368
The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the recently adopted
General Plan as evaluated by the General Plan EIR. All policies and Standard Conditions of
Approval identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the
City and would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The
proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and
does not change the conclusions of the EIR or require new Standard Conditions of Approval
or mitigation. Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan
would be required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis.
5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or
alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR
would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project would not result in direct physical changes to the environment but
would ensure that the Development Code is consistent with the General Plan. As such,
development in the City would continue to be consistent with the buildout projected in the
General Plan EIR, and the resulting impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR would remain
the same. Therefore, no new Standard Conditions of Approval, mitigation measures, or
alternatives to the proposed project would be required.
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or added information that was not known
and could not have been known at the time of the adoption of the General Plan EIR. As a result,
and for the reasons explained in this addendum, the proposed project would not cause any new
significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant
environmental impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project does
not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a
subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by CEQA
Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum.
Page 369
6
4
6
8
ATTACHMENT 4
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
Resolution-2025-102
Page 370
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 1053
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
AMENDING SECTION 17.130.040.B AND TITLE 17.130.050-1 OF
CHAPTER 17.130 OF TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND FLOOR AREA RATIO AND NON-
RESIDENTIAL GROUND FLOOR HEIGHT AND USE
REQUIREMENTS, AMENDING TABLE 17.138.030-1 OF
CHAPTER 17.138 OF TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND BLOCK FACE LENGTH FOR
CONSISTENCY WITH A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF,
AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
2021050261)
I.Recitals.
A.The City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) has initiated a Municipal Code
Amendment (DRC2025-00256) to implement a set of companion proposed General Plan
Amendments (DRC2025-00255). The City has prepared a set of amendments, as described in
the title of this Ordinance. Hereafter in this Ordinance, the subject Municipal Code amendments
are collectively referred to as the “Amendments.”
B.The City has prepared an Addendum to the previously certified General Plan
Update Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH# 2021050261) and the Addendum
evaluated the proposed Amendments under the General Plan FEIR. The Addendum is attached
hereto in Exhibit “B,” incorporated into this Ordinance as if fully stated herein.
C.On October 22, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendments and the Addendum, opened the public
hearing, and continued the meeting and the hearing to November 12, 2025.
D.On November 12, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a continued public
hearing on the Amendments, concluded the hearing on that date, and thereafter, among other
actions, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-041, recommending that the City
Council adopt the Amendments and adopt the Addendum.
E.On December 17, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on the Amendments and Addendum and concluded the hearing on that date.
F.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
II.Findings.
A.The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part I of
this Ordinance, are true and correct.
B.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2025, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
ATTACHMENT 5
Page 371
Page 2 of 3
1. The Articles/Chapters/Sections of the Municipal Code subject to the
Amendments are as follows, and as set forth in Exhibit A:
a. Section 17.130.040 (Supplemental to Zones) of Chapter 17.130
(Zone and Building Standards) of Article VIII (Form-Based Zones) of Title 17 (Development Code)
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to eliminate subsections B.1 and
B.3 and amend and renumber B.2 to consolidate all ground floor non-residential use overlays;
b. Table 17.130.050-1 of Section 17.130.050 (Specific to Zones) of
Chapter 17.130 (Zone and Building Standards) of Article VIII (Form-Based Zones) of Title 17
(Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to change
“Floor Area Ratio” to “Target Floor Area Ratio,” amend footnote 2 for ground floor non-residential
uses, and add footnote 5 to delineate requirements of the ground floor non-residential uses along
Foothill Boulevard and portions of Haven Avenue; and
c. Table 17.138.030-1 of Section 17.138.030 (Site and Block
Configurations) of Chapter 17.138 (Large Site Development) of Article VIII (Form-Based Zones)
of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended
to change “Block Face Length” and “Perimeter” for the Center 1 (CE1), Mixed Employment (ME1),
Mixed Employment 2 (ME2), Corridor 1 (CO1), Corridor 2 (CO2) and Center 2 (CE2) zones to
reflect a maximum block face length of 600 feet and maximum perimeter of 1,800 feet.
2. The Amendments conform to and do not conflict with the goals, policies,
and implementation programs of the General Plan, including, without limitation, the Housing and
Land Use Elements thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the
General Plan.
3. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and then
State’s CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared an Addendum to the Certified Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH #2021050261) prepared for the General Plan Update,
attached hereto in Exhibit B. The Addendum concludes that the proposed Amendments do not
result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the FEIR. No new
information of substantial importance has become available nor any substantial changes to the
circumstances since the FEIR certified have occurred. The proposed Amendments do not
substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the topics analyzed in the FEIR, nor would
the Amendments require new mitigation measures or alternatives. Based on this evidence and
all evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with Planning Department staff’s determination
that the proposed Amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment, and an
Addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA.
III. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Part II above, the City
Council hereby adopts the Amendments as set forth in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason be held invalid or
Page 372
Page 3 of 3
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other
Ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances,
which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver
of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______________, 2026.
_____________________________________
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
I, KIM SEVY, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the 17th day of December, 2025, and was finally passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of ______________,
2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:______________________________
City Clerk
Page 373
Exhibit A
Municipal Code Amendments
Page 374
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.130.040 §17.130.050
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
§ 17.130.040. Supplemental to Zones.
This section applies to all zones listed in this chapter. Where identified on the zoning map, form-
based zones are subject to the following additional standards and restrictions which supersede the
base zone requirements.
A.Cucamonga Station Area Overlay. When applied on the zoning map, the Station Area Overlay
modifies the base zone standards as follows:
1.FAR (Max.): 3.0 for an individual development site, maximum 2.0 average FAR for the
Overlay Area;
2.Density (min.): 60 Du/Ac;
3.Use Mix Requirements: Projects within this zone must be developed with minimum 50
percent nonresidential uses;
4. Allowed land uses: In addition to the uses allowed in the base zone, the following uses
are permitted by right:
a. Park and Ride Facility,
b. Parking Facility,
c. Transit Facility.
5.Ground Floor Use: Projects within 1/4 mile of the Metrolink station must comply with
the ground floor use requirements of section 17.130.040(B)(1), below.
B.Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions. The following ground floor use
requirements supersede the land use standards of this article. Building, facade, and entryway
requirements by zone still apply.
1. Corridor Fronting Retail/Commercial/Nonresidential Ground Floor Use Required.
a.Properties designated with a Corridor Fronting Retail, Commercial, or Ground
Floor Use designation must not be developed with residential units on the first or
ground floor fronting Foothill Boulevard or Haven Avenue (south of Church Street
and north of Jersey Boulevard).
b.Allowed uses are limited to any nonresidential use that is allowed in the base zone.
c. Residential uses are allowed on upper stories or behind ground floor nonresidential
uses.
d.Uses associated with an on-site residential use, such as leasing office, community
space, the work component of a live/work unit, gym for residents, child care space,
communal work space, or project amenities are allowed on the ground floor but
limited to no more than 30% of the ground floor frontage.
(Ord. No. 1000 § 4, 2022; Ord. No. 1015 § 3, 2023)
§ 17.130.050. Specific to Zones.
This section establishes development standards that are specific to each form-based zone.
Page 375
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.130.040 §17.130.050
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
Standards specific to zones include those for density, intensity, frontage area, overall building
height, ground floor height, and surface parking setbacks. Development may be further limited by
building type, as established in section 17.130.060 (Building Type Standards).
Page 376
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§ 17.130.050 § 17.130.050
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
Page 377
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
Table 17.130.050-1 of Section 17.130.050 Specific to Zones
Table 17.130.050-1 Required Build-to-Line, Height, and Frontage Area.
Form-Based Zones
Standard [1]
NE2 NG3 CE1 ME1 ME2 CO1 CO2 CE2
DENSITY AND INTENSITY (MAX.)[4]
Dwelling Units per Acre
(Du/ac) (min./max.)
0/8 0/24 0/30 18/30 24/42 24/42 36/60 40/100
20/50 in
subzone
Target Nonresidential Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) (min./max.)
[2]
0/0.4 0.4/0.6
0.2/0.4 in
subzone
0.2/1 0.6/2.0 0.4/2.0 0.4/1.0 0.6/1.5 1.0/2.0
0.2/0.4 in
subzone
BUILD-TO LINES
A Primary Build-to Line
(max./min.)
40 ft./NA 5 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./10 ft. 5 ft./20 ft. 5 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./10 ft.
B Secondary Build-to Line
(max./min.)
30 ft./NA 5 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./10 ft. 5 ft./20 ft. 5 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./15 ft. 0 ft./10 ft.
BUILDING PLACEMENT WITHIN PRIVATE FRONTAGE AREAS
C
— x 100
D
Minimum Built Percentage of Primary
Frontage Width
NA 65% of
primary
frontage
width
80% of primary
frontage width
70% of primary
frontage width
75% of
primary
frontage
width
80% of primary
frontage width
85% of
primary
frontage
width
90% of primary
frontage width
E
— x 100
F
Minimum Built Percentage of
Secondary Frontage Width
NA 30% of
secondary
frontage
width
30% of
secondary
frontage width
30% of
secondary
frontage width
30% of
secondary
frontage
width
30% of
secondary
frontage width
30% of
secondary
frontage
width
40% of
secondary
frontage width
HEIGHT
G Ground Floor Residential Use (min.) 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
H Ground Floor Nonresidential Use
(min.)
12 ft. 12 ft. 15 ft. 12 ft. 12 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft.
I Upper Floor Nonresidential Height
(min.)
9 ft. 9 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 9 ft. 9 ft. 9 ft.
J Residential Finish Floor Elevation
above Grade at Max. Build-to Line
(min.)
0 in. 36 in.
max.
30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in. 30 in.
Page 378
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
Table 17.130.050-1 of Section 17.130.050 Specific to Zones
Table 17.130.050-1 Required Build-to-Line, Height, and Frontage Area.
K
Standard [1]
Nonresidential Finish Floor Elevation
above Grade at Max. Build-to Line
(max.)
NE2
18 in.
NG3
18 in.
CE1
18 in.
Form-Base
ME1
12 in.
d Zones
ME2
12 in.
CO1
12 in.
CO2
12 in.
CE2
12 in.
L Total Stories (max.)[3] 3 stories 3 stories 4 stories 5 stories 4 stories 4 stories 5 stories
If located within a community activity
node, fronting Foothill Blvd or Haven
Ave., or as approved consistent with
chapter 17. 138 (Large Site
Development)
5 stories 5 stories 7 stories no maximum
PARKING SETBACKS (MIN.)
M Surface Parking, Front, or Street Side if
located on a Transit Priority Street
25 ft. from
building facade
30 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft.
N Surface Parking, Street Side (if not
located on a Transit Priority Street)
25 ft. from
building facade 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
Notes:
1. The maximums allowed by zone may not be attainable due to limitations from other standards (e.g., building and design standards) or unique site characteristics, such as lot size, trees,
waterways, and steep slopes.
2. FAR applies to nonresidential portion of the development only, including nonresidential portions of mixed-use development. Ground floor project amenity spaces associated with the on-site
residential use (ex. leasing office, community space, gym for residents, child care space, communal work space etc.) shall be limited to a maximum of 30% of the ground floor frontage
3. Maximum height in feet determined by building type, see section 17.130.060. For properties within the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (OALCP), the maximum height is
established in the OALCP. The OALCP standard supersedes the maximum height allowed in this article.
4.
5.
Density and FAR are calculated individually. When there are multiple development sites on a single property, individual development sites may deviate from minimum or maximum
standards so long as the total site average FAR and Du/AC are within established limits.
All new developments located along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue (south of Church Street and north of Jersey Boulevard) are required to contain ground-floor commercial space
fronting onto Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
Page 379
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.130.050 §17.130.050
(Ord. No. 1000 § 4, 2022; Ord. No. 1015 § 3, 2023; Ord. No. 1017 § 13, 2023; Ord. No. 1023, 1/
17/2024)
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2024-10-31
Page 380
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2025-10-14
§17.138.030. Site and Block Configurations.
A.Block Size.
1.Individual block faces and the total block perimeter shall meet the standards
established in Table 17.138.030-1 (Block Size).
2.If a block contains multiple zones, the most intense zone shall be used to
establish the requirements for block size.
3.Blocks may be irregularly shaped (i.e., nonrectangular) provided they are still
in compliance with the standards in Table 17.138.030-1 (Block Size).
4.Blocks may exceed the maximum allowed face length if a paseo is included, in
compliance with section 17.134.080 (Paseo) and as follows in figures in this
section:
a. Paseos must cut through the entire block;
b. Blocks must comply with maximum perimeter requirements;
c.The block face length on either side of the paseo may not exceed the
maximum in Table 17.138.030-1 (Block Size);
d. The total block face length may not exceed 150 percent of the maximum
in Table 17.138.030-1; and
e.Maximum one paseo per block.
TABLE 17.138.030-1 BLOCK SIZE
Zone Block Face Length (max.) Perimeter (max.)
Neighborhood General 2
(NE2)
700 ft. 2,400 ft.
Neighborhood General 3
(NG3)
500 ft. 1,600 ft.
Center 1 (CE1) 600 ft. 1,800 ft.
Mixed Employment 1
(ME1)
600 ft. 1,800 ft.
Mixed Employment 2
(ME2)
600 ft. 1,800 ft.
Corridor 1 (CO1) 600 ft. 1,800 ft.
Corridor 2 (CO2) 600 ft. 1,800 ft.
Center 2 (CE2) 600 ft. 1,800 ft.
B.Thoroughfares. Public or private thoroughfares define the publicly accessible
circulation network that refines large sites into more interconnected environments.
Page 381
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2025-10-14
§17.138.030 §17.138.030
They provide multiple routes for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation.
1.Design.
a.Thoroughfares (public or private) must comply with city standards and be
designed as public streets.
b.Drive aisles not designed as streets do not constitute a thoroughfare and
do not satisfy the requirements of this section.
c.Thoroughfares within the project must be designed in a manner that is
appropriate to their context, with the various elements of the right-of-way
(e.g. travel lanes, sidewalk dimensions, etc.) balanced with the land uses
and public frontages along the thoroughfare. Therefore, along the length
of the thoroughfare, if the context changes, the design of the thoroughfare,
especially with regard to pedestrian amenities, must also change.
d.All required thoroughfares shall include:
i.A landscape buffer between the right-of-way and frontage road;
ii.At least one lane of on-street parking, either angled or parallel, that
includes a minimum of two EV stations installed per block;
iii.A recommended sidewalk width of eight feet minimum; and
iv. A recommended lane width of 10 feet minimum.
e.The requirements for a frontage road is at the discretion of the Director of
Engineering Services.
f.The design of proposed new thoroughfares (public or private) shall be
reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal.
Page 382
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.138.030 §17.138.030
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2025-10-14
2. Multiway/Frontage Road Design.
a. Where project sites or development sites exceed 500 feet along any right-
of-way, a frontage road is required.
b.All required frontage roads shall include:
i.A landscape buffer between the right-of way and frontage road;
ii.At least one lane of on-street parking, either angled or parallel, that
is EV Ready along the length of the frontage road; and
iii.A sidewalk a minimum of eight feet in width. If corridor fronting
retail or commercial uses are required per section 17.130.040, the
sidewalk minimum shall be 12 feet in width.
c.The requirements for a frontage road is at the discretion of the Director of
Engineering Services.
d.The design of proposed new multiways/frontage roads shall be reviewed
and approved by the Fire Marshal.
3.External Connectivity.
a.Thoroughfares must be arranged to connect from existing or proposed
thoroughfares into adjoining properties whether the adjoining properties
are undeveloped and intended for future development, or if the adjoining
lands are developed and include opportunities for the connections.
b.Thoroughfare rights-of-way must be extended to or located along
adjoining property boundaries to provide a roadway connection or
Page 383
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.138.030 §17.138.030
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2025-10-14
thoroughfare stub for development in compliance with the standards in
subsection A (Block Size).
c.The project site plan must identify all stub streets for thoroughfares and
include a notation that all stub streets must connect with future
thoroughfares on adjoining property.
d. Cul-de-sacs are not allowed.
C.Transitions. To facilitate a transition in building height,
massing, and scale from corridors to adjacent
residential neighborhoods, the following standards
apply.
1.For projects with a lot depth 800 feet or greater
which share a side or rear lot line with a zone with
a lower maximum density or height limit, the
following standards apply:
a.Single-family adjacent: The maximum
height for buildings on development sites
which share the lot line is the maximum
allowed by the building type or one story
above the maximum allowed height of the
adjacent zone, whichever is less.
b.Multi-family adjacent: The maximum height for buildings on
development sites which share the lot line is the maximum allowed by the
building type or two stories above the maximum height of the adjacent
zone, whichever is less.
2.The height restriction applies to the entirety of the building which is adjacent
to the shared lot line.
3.Exemptions. Buildings which are entirely located 60 ft or greater from the
shared lot line are not subject to the height restrictions of this subsection.
4.Additional building types that are not permitted in the base zone are allowed
subject to a conditional use permit if the proposed building types are
determined to be compatible in size and scale to the adjacent lower intensity
zone.
D.Required Nonresidential Use.
1.Nonresidential uses must occupy a minimum percent of the project building
square footage as established in Table 17.138.030-2 (Nonresidential Use Mix).
Nonresidential uses provided in compliance with subsection 17.130.040(B)
(Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions) may count toward the
minimum requirement.
2.When in conflict with the ground floor use restrictions in subsection
Page 384
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/RA4992 on 2025-10-14
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
§17.138.030 §17.138.030
17.130.040(B) (Corridor Fronting Ground Floor Use Restrictions) and/or the
minimum FAR standards in table 17.130.050-1 (Required Build-To-Line,
Height, and Frontage Area), the most restrictive standards apply.
TABLE 17.138.030-2 NONRESIDENTIAL USE MIX
Zone Minimum
Corridor 1 (CO1) 20%
Corridor 2 (CO2) 20%
Center 1 (CE1) 33%
Center 2 (CE2)* 33%
*Does not apply to the Limited subzone
(Ord. No. 1000 § 4, 2022; Ord. No. 1015 § 3, 2023; Ord. No. 1017 § 16, 2023)
Page 385
Exhibit B
EIR Addendum
Page 386
October 2025 | General Plan EIR Addendum
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR
SCH No. 2021050261
FOR THE
2025 GENERAL PLAN and
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared by:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact: Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga,
CA 91730
909.477.2750
Page 387
1.Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
1.1 BACKGROUND
This document serves as the environmental documentation for the City’s update to its
Development Code (proposed project) to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan. This
addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified in December 2021
(State Clearinghouse No. 2021050261), demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR
adequately addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the
proposed project and that none of the conditions described in the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162, exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or
negative declaration is not necessary.
1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), an addendum shall be prepared if some changes
or additions to a previously adopted EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated
in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR
have occurred. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative
Declarations):
When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no
subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines,
on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of
the following:
(1)Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects;
(2)Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or
negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects; or
(3)New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
EIR was certified as complete or negative declaration was adopted, shows any of
the following:
(a)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
(b)Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
Page 388
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure
or alternative; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects requiring major revisions to the General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the
substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a
subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate
environmental document to address changes to the project.
As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR):
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a
previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor
technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or
negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or
attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or
adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to
Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead
agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation
must be supported by substantial evidence.
A copy of this addendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730.
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The intent of the project is to make minor updates to General Plan policies, diagrams and maps
to clarify information as well as update the Development Code to ensure consistency with the
changes proposed to the General Plan. The key amendments to the General Plan and
Page 389
Development Code are described below.
1. General Plan Land Use and Community Character (Volume 2) Changes
a. Change from “Non-Residential Intensity (FAR)” to “Target Non-Residential Intensity
(FAR)”:
Proposed amendments to Tables LC-1, LC-2, LC-3, LC-4, and LC-5 clarify that
nonresidential intensity (FAR) is a target for the land use districts, not a mandate
for each individual parcel. This was explained on page 62 of Volume 2 of the
General Plan, the lack of the word “Target” on the tables led to confusion and
misinterpretation.
b. Update Policy LC-2.6 for ground floor non-residential uses in mixed use developments:
This amendment clarifies objective height standards, rather than FAR, for first floor
non-residential uses. This establishes the standards that can meet the “Target
Nonresidential Floor Area Ratio” for the designation. This implements the non-
residential portion of a mixed-use development.
c. Add a new policy to Goal LC-2 regarding block length:
The proposed policy states, “LC-2.12 Block Length. For all designations other than
Neighborhoods, require blocks be designed no longer than 600 feet nor a perimeter
exceeding 1,800 feet. Exceptions within 10% can be made at the discretion of the
City to align new streets with existing streets.” This proposed policy aligns with
policy LC-4.6 which includes the same block dimensions but also provides flexibility
in allowing for exceptions within 10% to ensure proper alignment between new
streets and existing streets thereby achieving the goal of designing for a safe and
active human-scaled pedestrian realm.
d. Modify Policy LC-2.10 for auto dependent uses:
Policy LC-2.10 Pedestrian-Oriented Auto-Dependent Uses currently states,
“Require auto dependent uses such as drive-throughs, car washes, automobile
service stations, and similar auto-focused businesses, to be designed with buildings
oriented toward the primary street and the auto-servicing use/activity in the rear.
Prohibit auto-dependent uses from locating in pedestrian-priority environments,
such as City Centers, Traditional Town centers, and all Neighborhoods.” The
amendment would add “…or on streets that prioritize pedestrians” at the end of the
sentence to broaden the prohibition of auto-dependent uses locating within
pedestrian-priority environments. This amendment seeks to further implement Goal
LC-2, stated above, by creating and fostering a safe and active public realm that
would otherwise be intruded by auto-dependent uses.
2. General Plan Mobility and Access (Volume 2) Changes
a. Addition of BRT and frontage lane layouts for Foothill and Haven:
These layouts provide objective standards for the desired frontage lane that is
articulated in the General Plan.
b. Addition of dimensional standards for all roadway typologies:
Adding objective standards for the roadway typologies provides clarity for future
development to meet the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Page 390
c. Updated Truck Routes Map:
This amendment, required by AB 98, updates the truck routes map to reflect
changes in goods movements patterns within the city to remove two truck routes to
consolidate freight activity and reduce freight movement from sensitive receptors in
the City.
3. Development Code Changes for Consistency with the Changes to the General Plan
a. Amendment to Table 17.130.050-1 (xxx) in Chapter 17.130 of Article XXX (Form
Based Code):
This will amend the table to clarify to remove non-residential FAR from the table as
a parcel level development standard and update ground floor non-residential height
dimensions consistent with the amended language in the General Plan.
b. Amendment to Section 17.138.030 (xxx) in Chapter 17.138 of Article XXX (Form Based
Code):
This will amend the block length standards consistent with the amended language
in the General Plan.
2. Findings
The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas,
open space, mobility and access, housing, public facilities and services, resource conservation,
safety, and noise. The General Plan EIR included Standard Conditions of Approval (See
Chapter 4 Implementation) for the following environmental topics: aesthetics, air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire.
The policies of the General Plan and the City’s existing development standards apply to all
development in the General Plan Planning Area and would continue following adoption of the
proposed project. As indicated above, the project is designed to enhance clarity of the General
Plan, meet the requirements of AB 98 and update the code to be consistent with the changes
proposed in the General Plan Amendment.
The General Plan EIR considered land use designations and the general pattern of future
development. While the Development Code is not specifically evaluated in the General Plan
EIR, state law requires that land use and zoning be consistent. The General Plan EIR included
policy changes as well as an update to the Development Code, which included zoning updates.
Overall, the proposed revisions to the Development Code are minor in nature and are required
to ensure consistency with the recently adopted General Plan, any physical impacts associated
with the rezoning of parcels are addressed through the City’s General Plan Implementation
Chapter, zoning, and development standards. For these reasons, the proposed project would
not change the conclusions of the General Plan EIR.
The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the
project.
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major
Page 391
revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects
or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The proposed project would better clarify the intent of the General Plan, eliminate truck
routes from sensitive receptors and align the Development Code with the recently adopted
General Plan; therefore, the proposed revisions to the General Plan and Development Code
are consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR and adopted by
the City. Consequently, the changes to the General Plan and Development Code would not
change the conclusions of the EIR.
2. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
The General Plan Update anticipated the need to amend the Development Code to
implement the goals and policies adopted by the City. The General Plan EIR relies upon the
Implementation Measures included in the General Plan to regulate all future development.
These Measures will continue to apply to all development in the City and will have the same
mitigating effects as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Because these changes are a result
of the Development Code review anticipated by the General Plan Update, there is no new
information that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General
Plan EIR was certified. The impacts from the proposed project would be the same as those
disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that significant effects
previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous
EIR.
The proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed in the
General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions of Approval identified
in the General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new
development. These policies would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the
General Plan EIR. The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the
recently adopted General Plan, and therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan EIR. There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant
effects examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General
Plan EIR. Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan would be
required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis.
4. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Page 392
The proposed project would better align the Development Code with the recently adopted
General Plan as evaluated by the General Plan EIR. All policies and Standard Conditions of
Approval identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the
City and would have the same mitigating effect as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The
proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and
does not change the conclusions of the EIR or require new Standard Conditions of Approval
or mitigation. Future development that would require amendments to the General Plan
would be required to undergo appropriate environmental analysis.
5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or
alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR
would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project would not result in direct physical changes to the environment but
would ensure that the Development Code is consistent with the General Plan. As such,
development in the City would continue to be consistent with the buildout projected in the
General Plan EIR, and the resulting impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR would remain
the same. Therefore, no new Standard Conditions of Approval, mitigation measures, or
alternatives to the proposed project would be required.
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or added information that was not known
and could not have been known at the time of the adoption of the General Plan EIR. As a result,
and for the reasons explained in this addendum, the proposed project would not cause any new
significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant
environmental impacts disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project does
not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a
subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by CEQA
Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum.
Page 393
ATTACHMENT 6
ORDINANCE NO. 1054
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
AMENDING SECTION 10.56.020 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALTER TRUCK ROUTES,
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
I. Recitals.
A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is authorized by California Vehicle Code
Section 35401 to establish truck length distances consistent with the maximum distances that the
highway or highway portion can sustain to promote public health and safety.
B. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the above referenced authorities in order to
modify the existing truck routes within the City.
II. Findings.
A. This City Council hereby finds and concludes that this Ordinance is consistent with
the General Plan’s goals, policies, and implementation programs. The City’s General Plan
identifies the allowable truck routes throughout the City in Figure M-9 of Chapter 4 “Mobility and
Access” of Volume 2 of the General Plan. These identified truck routes and truck routes with a
38-foot kingpin limit are reflected in the updates to the identified truck routes and 38-foot kingpin
limit truck routes of Municipal Code Section 10.56.020 of this Ordinance. The updates to the
Municipal Code that Section 10.56.020 contained herein reflect removal of the truck routes with
a 38-foot kingpin limit on Vineyard Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street and
Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to State Route 210 and mirror the truck routes identified
in the General Plan Amendment adopted on ____________.
B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State’s
CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is covered by general rule
that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. The City Council finds that there is no possible significant effect directly related to
adoption of this Ordinance, therefore no further action is required under CEQA pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3)). This is because the number of
trips by heavy vehicles on City streets will not be affected and neither will levels of traffic, noise and
air pollution. Furthermore, the truck routes included within this Ordinance have been included in the
General Plan Amendment adopted on ________________. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State’s CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared an addendum to the
Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH #2021050261) prepared for the General
Plan Update. The addendum concludes that the proposed amendments to the General Plan,
including removal of the truck routes under this ordinance, do not result in any new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects beyond what was analyzed in the FEIR. No new information of substantial importance has
become available nor any substantial changes to the circumstances since the FEIR certified have
occurred. The proposed amendments do not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to
the topics analyzed in the FEIR, nor would the amendments require new mitigation measure or
alternatives.
Page 394
Truck Route Ordinance – Page 2 of 3
6
4
6
7
III. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 10.56.020 (Restricted Truck Routes) of Chapter 10.56 (Truck
Routes and Restrictions) is amended as follows:
“10.56.020 Restricted truck routes.
A. Vehicle Code § 35401(e) allows any city, upon finding that certain streets cannot safely
sustain the operation of trailers or semitrailers having the maximum kingpin to rearmost axle
distance permitted under Vehicle Code § 35400, to restrict the use of such streets by trailers or
semitrailers having a maximum kingpin distance as determined. Certain city streets have been
determined to be able to safely accommodate a maximum such distance of 38 feet. Except as
otherwise provided by law, trailers and semitrailers having a kingpin to rearmost axle distance in
excess of 38 feet are prohibited from using the such streets. The streets described in this
section shall be known as “restricted truck routes.” Restricted truck routes in the city include:
1. Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to State Route 210.
B. The provisions of this section may be enforced when and where the city traffic engineer has
provided signing designating restricted truck routes.”
SECTION 2. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason be held invalid
or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other
Ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances,
which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver
of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______________, 2026.
_____________________________________
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
Page 395
Truck Route Ordinance – Page 3 of 3
6
4
6
7
I, KIM SEVY, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the _____ day of _______________, 2025, and was finally passed at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of
______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:______________________________
City Clerk
Page 396
General Plan & Code Amendments
DRC2025 -00255 & 256
December 17, 2025
BACKGROUND
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
•General Plan adopted in December 2021
•Need for technical updates
•Land Use and Community Character
•Mobility
•Municipal Code amendments needed to
support/implement proposed changes to the
General Plan
Floor Area Ratio
•Clarify “Target Non -Residential Intensity”
•Eliminate FAR as a parcel-based requirement
Ground Floor Non-Residential
•Adding a minimum height requirement
•Clarifying where it is required
•Permit some amenity space on the ground floor
•Collapse types of non-residential uses allowed
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
New Policy LC-2.12
•Block Length Max. 600 feet, perimeter 1,800
feet
•Allows for exceptions of up to 10%
•Goal of aligning with existing streets
Amended Policy LC-2.10
•Auto dependent uses (gas station, drive thru, car
wash)
•Clarifying prohibition on pedestrian priority
streets
•Creating safe and active public realm
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
8 th Street Trail
•Deemed unfeasible
•Reallocate resources to existing infrastructure
•Remove references to the 8th Street trail
•Focus Area 1(Downtown Cucamonga)
•Focus Area 3 (HART District)
•Focus Area 5 (Cucamonga Town Center)
•Focus Area 8 (SE Industrial Area)
•Remove task from implementation workplan
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Boulevard Configurations for Foothill & Haven
•Foothill Boulevard east of Haven
•Haven Avenue South of Foothill to 7th Street
•Adding dimensional drawings
•Including the frontage lane
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
With Bus
Rapid
Transit
Without
Bus Rapid
Transit
Roadway Typologies
•Adding a dimensions by roadway type
•Maximum ROW width
•Standards for lanes, medians and sidewalks
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
AB 98 Truck Route Evaluation
•Reviewed existing truck routes for proximity to
sensitive receptors
•Vineyard/Carnelian had sensitive receptors
along 73% of the route
•Updated the truck routes map
Other Amendments
•Incorporated Connect RC map
•Updated grade crossings in Focus Area 8
•Update goals and policies to prioritize safety
projects
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS 10
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
•An addendum to the General Plan EIR was
prepared
•EIR addresses all environmental issues
•No new significant impacts from this project
•Tribal notification initiated on August 29,
2024
•Notice published in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin on December 5th
•Individual noticing not required
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & NOTICE
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission Public Hearing on November 12, 2025
Planning Commission and Staff recommend the following:
•Adoption of Resolution 2025-102
•Conduct First Reading of Ordinances 1053 and 1054
GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager, Community Development
Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
Sean McPherson, Principal Planner
Jared Knight, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of City Council Ordinance No.
1052 to Approve Development Agreement DRC2022-00266 to be Read
by Title Only and Waive Further Reading: to Consider a City Council
Resolution to Adopt Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Tentative Parcel
Map (SUBTPM20173), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009), and
Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) for the Development of
Three (3) Concrete Tilt-up Industrial Buildings Totaling Approximately
982,096 Square Feet on Approximately 45.96 Net Acres Bound by
Vineyard Avenue to the East, 9th Street to the North, Baker Avenue to
the West, and the BNSF/Metrolink Railroad Line to the South; APN:
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, -97. An Environmental
Impact Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was Prepared for the Project.
(Primary Case File No: Design Review (DRC2019-00742).
(RESOLUTION NO. 2025-101 AND ORDINANCE NO. 1052) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve Design Review (DRC2019-
00742), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009),
Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266), and Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-
00854) through the adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution for the subject Project.
BACKGROUND:
The project site totals approximately 45.96 acres and is comprised of nine adjacent parcels (APN:
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, -97), generally located between Baker Avenue to
the west, the Cucamonga Channel and Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th Street to the north and
the BNSF/Metrolink Railroad to the south.
The project site had been previously developed with various industrial buildings which were
demolished in 2022 and is currently vacant except for an existing cell phone tower west of
Vineyard Avenue along the project’s southern property line, which will remain. The project site
also includes a vacant structure on the west side of the site at 8803 Baker Avenue, which is a
Page 397
Page 2
3
2
6
3
designated historic landmark referred to in this report as the “Baker House.” This structure is also
proposed to remain as described below. The majority of the project site is covered with low-lying
vegetation consisting of grasses and weeds.
Staff notes that the subject site has been zoned for industrial development since at least the early
1980s. While the project currently has a land use designation of Neo-Industrial Employment
District and is located within the Neo-Industrial zone, both of which were created in 2021 and
2022 respectively, staff notes that the project was deemed complete on June 16, 2021, prior to
the adoption of current zoning code standards for industrial development and as such is subject
to zoning standards under the General Industrial standards which were in place prior to the
adoption of the current Neo-Industrial zone.
On November 12, 2025, the Planning Commission considered the item at a duly noticed public
hearing. At that meeting, members of the public spoke requesting information on proposed
tenants, wall heights surrounding the project and traffic resulting from the development. Prior to
the meeting, correspondence was received from another resident expressing similar concerns.
Further, and also prior to the meeting, another letter was received from a firm which had previously
commented on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) expressing concerns about the
environmental analysis. After considering these comments and deliberating on the item, the
Planning Commission voted four-to-one in favor of recommending that the City Council approve
the project. For details regarding the November 12, 2025 Planning Commission meeting, please
see the Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes included with this staff report as
Attachment 4.
ANALYSIS:
Project Context
The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into four new parcels and construct three new
industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 982,096 square feet in size as indicated in
Figure 1 below. Parcel 1 proposes an area of approximately 28 acres with street frontage along
9th street and Vineyard Avenue and will be improved with Building 1 totaling approximately
611,574 square feet. Parcel 2 proposes an area of approximately 6 acres and will be improved
with Building 2 totaling 107,541 square feet. Parcel 3 proposes an area of approximately 12 acres
and will be improved by Building 3, totaling 262,981 square feet with street frontage along Baker
Avenue. Parcel 4 proposes an area of approximately an acre and is currently improved with the
Baker House which is proposed to be rehabilitated and dedicated to the City for future City use.
Page 398
Page 3
3
2
6
3
Figure 1: Site Plan
Building 1 will have an office area not to exceed 4,000 square feet and a maximum height of 40
feet. Building 2 will have office areas on the first and second floor, both not to exceed 2,000 square
feet, and a maximum height of 36 feet. Building 3 will have potential office areas on the first floor
not to exceed 2,500 square feet and on the second floor not to exceed 2,000 square feet, and a
maximum height of 36 feet.
Vehicular access to the site will be provided by a total of 5 driveways; two located along the
Vineyard Avenue frontage of the project, one located along 9th Street, and two located off Baker
Avenue. Notably, truck access will be prohibited at the Baker Avenue driveways, and trucks
exiting the project using the 9th Street driveway will be limited to right turns only. Staff notes that
the project is being developed on a speculative basis and that there are no confirmed tenants at
this time.
Based on the non-CEQA transportation study prepared by Fehr and Peers (May 2024), which for
thoroughness purposes has been included with the Draft EIR as Appendix K-2, the project would
result in increased traffic delays at three intersections: Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard,
Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, and Baker Avenue and 8th Street. To ensure that these
intersections maintain sufficient level of service, the transportation study found that the project
applicant shall be required to provide traffic improvements, including signal timing optimization at
both the Vineyard Avenue and Foothill and Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route intersections, as
well as construct a new traffic signal and reconfigured striping at Baker Avenue and 8th Street to
allow a southbound dedicated left-turn lane and shared through-right-turn-lane, and to restripe
the eastbound approach to have a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through-right-turn lane.
Further, staff notes that the developer has offered to voluntarily construct improvements at the
Vineyard Avenue and 9th Street intersection to further improve traffic flow and truck maneuvering.
Staff notes that since the Planning Commission public hearing, an additional condition of approval
has been added to the project clarifying these improvements at the Vineyard Avenue and 9th
Street intersection.
Page 399
Page 4
3
2
6
3
Figure 2: Excerpt of Typical Elevation
Staff notes that the project meets all relevant development standards for the General Industrial
(GI) zone, which was the zone in place at the time that the development application was deemed
complete on June 16, 2021. For a full discussion on compliance with standards, land use and
zoning designations and architecture, please see the November 12, 2025, Planning Commission
staff report.
Entitlements for Proposed Development
As noted in the title of the staff report, this project requires a Design Review, Tentative Parcel
Map, Conditional Use Permit, and Certificate of Appropriateness. Further, the applicant proposes
to enter into a Development Agreement with the City, which requires the review and approval of
an ordinance by the City Council. Detailed information on the Design Review, Tentative Parcel
Map, Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Appropriateness can be found by referencing the
November 12, 2025, Planning Commission staff report.
Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266)
As previously noted, the developer has also proposed to enter into a Development Agreement
with the city. Staff notes that at the time that the Planning Commission held it’s hearing, the
proposed Development Agreement was in draft form. The final proposed Development
Agreement is now included with this report as Attachment 6. Pursuant to Development Code
Section 17.22.060.A.1, development agreements:
1. Increase the certainty in the approval of development projects, thereby preventing the
waste of resources, reducing the cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging
investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public;
2. Provide assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies,
rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval thereby strengthening the
public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive planning,
and reducing the economic costs of development;
3. Enable the city to plan for and finance public facilities, including but not limited to, streets,
sewerage, transportation, drinking water, school and utility facilities, thereby removing a
serious impediment to the development of new housing.
The proposed Development Agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following major terms
which are summarized below:
Page 400
Page 5
3
2
6
3
The term of the development agreement would initially be eight years, with an option for
the applicant to extend the term by an additional two years upon payment of $1 million
dollars, provided the developer meets certain criteria;
A requirement for future tenants to designate Rancho Cucamonga as the point of sale for
the material handling equipment used in Project’s operations;
A requirement that the developer pay the Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee
in three stages prior to the timelines normally required by the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code allowing the City to utilize these funds toward support of affordable
housing projects sooner.
A requirement to pay $1,070,000 to the City for the future construction of sidewalks, traffic
calming improvements, or planting of trees within the area surrounding the project.
A requirement to extend RC Fiber infrastructure to serve the project site.
Within the Development Agreement, the applicant also agrees to rehabilitate the Baker House
and improve the Baker House structure to a tenant “shell”. The developer has also agreed to
improve the Baker House property with new parking and landscaping and dedicate the property
to the City by grant deed for future City use. Given the nature of rehabilitation of historic structures,
the Development Agreement would require the applicant to make improvements to the structure
and site up to a maximum of a value of $2.5 Million. However, if actual costs would exceed this
amount, the applicant would be required to deliver an improved tenant shell at a minimum at no
additional cost to the City. It should be noted that a specific use for this future structure has not
yet been determined by the City. A conceptual site plan for the Baker House parcel is included
with the draft Development Agreement.
Previous Meetings
In addition to the aforementioned November 12, 2025, Planning Commission public hearing, the
developer has also hosted two neighborhood meetings; one on April 22, 2022, and another on
August 8, 2024. At both meetings, members of the public and residents expressed concerns
regarding truck traffic, noise from operations of the proposed buildings, concerns about fiber optic
connections, and questions regarding screen walls between the site and adjacent existing
residential located on 9th Street. In response to concerns about traffic, staff notes that the applicant
has modified the site plan over time such that the project’s Baker Avenue entrances will be limited
to passenger vehicles; the developer has agreed to prohibit truck ingress and egress from the
Baker Avenue entrances. Further, the applicant has also agreed to limit truck traffic and
maneuvering on 9th Street, such that the proposed north-south driveway leading to 9th Street from
the project site will be limited to “right-only” truck turns, thus prohibiting trucks from accessing the
Baker Avenue and 9th Street intersection and surrounding residential neighborhoods. In response
to concerns about screening wall height, staff notes that the project provides the tallest maximum
wall height permitted (8 feet) to screen the development from adjacent existing residential abutting
the project site on 9th Street. Should the developer choose to construct a taller wall, they will be
required to submit an additional application to request such a deviation at a later date.
Environmental Assessment
Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(SCH #2019110456), has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is
to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a
project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public
participation. The contents of the EIR become a planning tool for the Planning Commission and
City Council to use in determining the appropriate and best land use for the project site.
The intent of the EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed
Page 401
Page 6
3
2
6
3
project and identify feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce
or eliminate these impacts. A summary of all of the project-related impacts and the recommended
mitigation measures is provided in the Final EIR. The following summarizes key points in the
environmental review process:
Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting
The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as public notification that an EIR is being prepared and
requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested parties regarding
environmental issues to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA
recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purpose of identifying the range of potential
significant impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping
meeting is to receive public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed
in the EIR as it relates to the project and environment.
Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting was prepared for the
project and circulated on November 18th, 2019 to the State Clearinghouse (SCH # 2019110456),
public agencies, Native American tribes, those interested parties who had previously requested
notification, and all property owners within 660 feet of the subject site. The notice advertising the
NOP and the public scoping meeting was also published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on
December 4th, 2020 and made publicly available on the city’s website. The Public Scoping
Meeting was held in-person at City Hall on December 12th, 2019. No members of the public or
any interested parties provided comments at the Public Scoping Meeting. The public comment
period to respond to the NOP closed on December 18th, 2019 and a comment letter was received
from the State of California Department of Justice Attorney General. Written responses to all
significant environmental issues raised were prepared and made available in the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).
Following the scoping meeting and the preparation of all environmental documents, the Draft EIR
was circulated for a mandatory 45-day public review starting on March 15, 2022, and concluding
on May 2, 2022. In response to this review, public concerns were raised regarding the content
and adequacy of the analysis prepared for the original EIR. The primary public concern involved
the inclusion of emissions credits from structures which had previously existed at the site, but that
were not occupied. Further, those structures were demolished between February and April 2022.
Because the project site is now vacant and undeveloped, except for the Baker House, the decision
was made to update technical studies for air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas
emissions, noise, and transportation based on the current site conditions. Accordingly, the DEIR
was then recirculated and distributed for a new 45-day public review period on June 20, 2024,
with the comment period concluding on August 5, 2024. A Notice of Availability including
electronic links to the DEIR and all technical appendices was posted at the County, published in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet, mailed to
interested parties requesting such notification and posted on the city’s website on June 20, 2024.
Further, and also on June 20, 2024, the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided to the
State Clearinghouse via the online “CEQAnet” portal for distribution to Responsible and Trustee
agencies and hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public
review at the following locations:
Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730;
Paul A Biane Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739;
Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Page 402
Page 7
3
2
6
3
Comments on the recirculated DEIR were received from the Southern California Gas Company,
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the California Air Resources Board
(CARB), Advocates for the Environment, Blum, Collins & Ho LLP, the City of Ontario, and the
Department of Public Works. Additionally, several comments were received from individual
residents living near the project area. The administrative DEIR and FEIR, inclusive of these
various comments listed above, as well as responses to these comments, are included with this
staff report as Attachment 3. Technical appendices and supporting documentation can be
referenced on the City‘s website under the tab ”CEQA Documents Available for Review“ under
the Current Projects & Planning Initiatives which can be accessed here:
https://www.cityofrc.us/community-development/planning
Staff notes that prior to the November 12, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing, a letter
dated November 11, 2025 was received from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
(GSEJA), a firm which had previously commented on the Draft EIR in 2024 and who had
expressed a number of concerns regarding the environmental analysis of the project. The
November 11, 2025 letter restated and reiterated many points made in the previous letter, which
had already been responded to as part of the Final EIR process. In short, and in response to the
November 11, 2025 letter, staff maintains that the Draft EIR prepared for the project is both
sufficient and thorough, and accurately analyzes the project and identifies sufficient mitigation
measures (see Attachment 7).
Also, following the Planning Commission meeting, staff received comments from a resident in
response to the Final EIR (Attachment 8). In those comments, the commentor expressed a
number of concerns, primarily regarding traffic. Regarding traffic, the commentor erroneously
noted that traffic counts hadn’t been conducted since 2019. To be clear, while traffic counts were
initially conducted in 2019, additional traffic counts were conducted in 2023 which formed the
basis of updates to the traffic analysis found in Appendix K-1 and K-2 of the CEQA document.
Staff notes that these updated analysis confirms that no traffic improvements are necessary at
the 9th and Vineyard intersection. Staff notes that although no improvements are required at this
intersection, the developer has offered to restripe the eastbound left-turn pocket as well as modify
the curbs at both the northwest and southwest corners of 9th and Vineyard to further improve truck
turning and maneuvering. As noted previously, these voluntary improvements by the developer
at 9th and Vineyard have been memorialized in the conditions of approval.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
In compliance with CEQA, a mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) has been
prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted mitigation measure that
reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing
milestones for each mitigation measure.
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration
The EIR concludes that the construction and implementation of this project will result in two
significant and unavoidable impacts pursuant to Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form of
the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, namely Land Use and Planning (Appendix G, Section XI) and
Noise (Appendix G, Section XIII).
Regarding impacts to Land Use and Planning, CEQA Statue and Guidelines Appendix G, Section
XI requires a determination of whether a project would cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect. Staff notes that General Plan policy LC-7.4 discourages
large industrial projects to be located within 1,000 feet of existing and planned residential
Page 403
Page 8
3
2
6
3
development. As proposed, the project will measure approximately 50 feet from the nearest
existing residence. Thus, the project is in conflict with the City’s land use plan and would result in
a significant unavoidable impact. Despite this, however, staff notes that the proposed project area
has been zoned for industrial use since at least the 1980s and the proposed project remains
consistent with all applicable zoning standards for development within the Neo-Industrial zone.
Regarding impacts to Noise, CEQA Statute and Guidelines Appendix G, Section XIII requires a
determination of whether a project would result in generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies. Staff notes that the operational characteristics of the proposed project will result in a
significant and unavoidable impact to noise. Specifically, as the developer anticipates the
proposed buildings to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, anticipated noise generated from
the use would be 60.2 decibels (dBA) as measured at nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), as
measured from the residences located along the north side of 9th Street. Further, noise thresholds
will also be exceeded in Ontario, specifically as measured from the residences located on the
southside of 8th Street. Whereas the City of Ontario establishes nighttime thresholds of 49 dBA
(10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), which is the current measured ambient noise level, operations from the
project will result in approximately 58 dBA at this location along the southside of 8th Street. As
such, the operational characteristics of the proposed project will exceed the noise thresholds for
both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario.
In accordance with CEQA, the City has prepared Findings and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations, which is included with this staff report as an attachment to the Resolution. This
document explains the various environmental impacts of the project as well as project benefits for
the Council’s consideration. As a note, both staff and the Planning Commission recommend that
the City Council adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Project site is currently assessed an annual property tax, a portion of which is shared with
the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the Project site when constructed
and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The proposed Project
will also allow for the development of new warehouse facilities to the benefit of the community by
growing its jobs base and tax revenue. Therefore, the project is anticipated to create long-term
positive economic benefits to the surrounding community.
The Project proponent will also be responsible for paying permit and impact fees, in addition to
other fees required by the Development Agreement associated with the project, such as
community benefit fees.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing
and anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the city with
new industrial warehouse facilities which will attract quality tenants, the project also results in the
restoration and preservation of a historic structure, the Baker House, to the benefit of the
community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Attachment 2 – Link_ Project Plans
Page 404
Page 9
3
2
6
3
Attachment 3 – Link_ Environmental Documentation
Attachment 4 – November 12, 2025, Planning Commission Staff Report and Meeting Minutes
Attachment 5 – City Council Resolution No. 2025-101 with CEQA Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations with Conditions of Approval
Attachment 6 – Draft Ordinance No. 1052 and Development Agreement
Attachment 7 – Response to November 11, 2025 GSEJA Comment Letter
Attachment 8 – December 5 Letter from Judy Summers
Page 405
Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Attachment 1
Page 406
ATTACHMENT 2
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
Project-Plans
Page 407
ATTACHMENT 3
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:
DEIR 9th and Vineyard Development Project and EIR
Page 408
DATE:November 12, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, Principal Planner, AICP
Jared Knight, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DESIGN REVIEW, TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – CP
LOGISTICS VINEYARD, LLC – A Recommendation to the City Council
regarding a request to allow for the development of three (3) concrete tilt-
up industrial buildings totaling approximately 982,096 square feet on
approximately 45.96 net acres bound by Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th
Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west, and the BNSF/Metrolink
railroad line to the south; APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -
96, -97. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was
prepared for the project. Primary Case File No. DRC2019-00742.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the
Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act,
adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and Statement of Overriding Considerations,
and approve Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173),
Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009), Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266), and
Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) through the adoption of the attached
Resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
The project site totals approximately 45.96 acres and is comprised of nine adjacent parcels (APN:
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, -97), generally located between Baker Avenue to
the West, the Cucamonga Channel and Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th Street to the North and
the BNSF/Metrolink Railroad to the South.
The project site had been previously developed with various industrial buildings which were
demolished in 2022 and is currently vacant except for an existing cell phone tower west of
Vineyard Avenue along the project’s southern property line, which will remain. The project site
also includes a vacant structure on the west side of the site at 8803 Baker Avenue, which is a
designated historic landmark referred to in this report as the “Baker House.” This structure is also
proposed to remain as described below. The majority of the project site is covered with low-lying
vegetation consisting of grasses and weeds.
Staff notes that the subject site has been zoned for industrial development since at least the early
1980s. While the project currently has a land use designation of Neo-Industrial Employment
Attachment 4
Page 409
Page 2 of 11
3
0
3
7
District and is located within the Neo-Industrial zone, both of which were created in 2021 and
2022 respectively, staff notes that the project was deemed complete on June 16, 2021, prior to
the adoption of current zoning code standards for industrial development and as such is subject
to zoning standards under the General Industrial standards which were in place prior to the
adoption of the current Neo-Industrial zone.
ANALYSIS:
The General Plan currently designates the project site as a Neo-Industrial Employment District,
and the site is currently zoned as Neo-Industrial (NI). Adjoining the site to the north along the
Lanyard Court cul-de-sac are 8 parcels, also in the NI zoning district, which are currently
developed with commercial industrial uses. Adjoining the site on the northwest corner of the
project site are 9 parcels in the Neighborhood General 3 – Limited (NG3-L) form-based zoning
district, which are currently improved with single-family residences. Single family residential
development is also present on the western side of Baker Avenue, across from the project site.
Opposite the project site on the northern side of 9th Street is a mix of industrial and residential
uses. Additional commercial and industrial uses exist to the east of the project site and additional
commercial and industrial uses exist opposite the BNSF/Metrolink tracks to the south of the site.
Further south, on the south side of 8th Street, there are existing single-family residences which
are located within the City of Ontario.
The existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties
are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
Industrial
Warehousing Neo-Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE)
Commercial
Retail Neo Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)North
Single-Family
Residential
Neighborhood Center
Suburban Neighborhood Low
Neighborhood General 3
Limited (NG3L)
Medium Residential
South
BNSF/Metrolink
rail,
Commercial,
Industrial
(Rancho
Cucamonga)
and a private
school and
Residential
(City of Ontario)
Neo-Industrial Employment District
(Rancho Cucamonga); Residential
(Ontario)
Neo-Industrial (NI – Rancho
Cucamonga); Low Density
Residential (Ontario)
West Single Family
Residential Traditional Neighborhood Low/Medium Residential
(LM)
Flood Control
Channel General Open Space and Facilities Flood Control Utility Corridor
(FC/UC)East Commercial
Retail Neo-Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
Page 410
Page 3 of 11
3
0
3
7
The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into four new parcels and construct three new
industrial warehouse buildings totaling approximately 982,096 square feet in size. Parcel 1
proposes an area of approximately 28 acres with street frontage along 9th street and Vineyard
Avenue and will be improved with Building 1 totaling approximately 611,574 square feet. Parcel
2 proposes an area of approximately 6 acres and will be improved with Building 2 totaling 107,541
square feet. Parcel 3 proposes an area of approximately 12 acres and will be improved by Building
3, totaling 262,981 square feet with street frontage along Baker Avenue. Parcel 4 proposes an
area of approximately an acre and is currently improved with the Baker House which is proposed
to be rehabilitated and dedicated to the City for future City use.
Figure 1: Site Plan
Building 1 will have an office area not to exceed 4,000 square feet and a maximum height of 40
feet. Building 2 will have office areas on the first and second floor, both not to exceed 2,000 square
feet, and a maximum height of 36 feet. Building 3 will have potential office areas on the first floor
not to exceed 2,500 square feet and on the second floor not to exceed 2,000 square feet, and a
maximum height of 36 feet.
Vehicular access to the site will be provided by a total of 5 driveways; two located along the
Vineyard Avenue frontage of the project, one located along 9th Street, and two located off Baker
Avenue. Notably, truck access will be prohibited at the Baker Avenue driveways, and trucks
exiting the project using the 9th Street driveway will be limited to right turns only. Staff notes that
the project is being developed on a speculative basis and that there are no confirmed tenants at
this time.
Architecture: The proposed industrial warehouse buildings meet the City’s pre-Ordinance 982
architectural standards. Each building provides well-defined articulation and a varied use of
architectural features. For example, the facades facing 9th Street, Vineyard Avenue, and Baker
Avenue feature typical concrete tilt-up façades punctuated with panel joints, reveals, and
windows. The northern and southern façades of Building 2, visible from a commercial center to
the north and 8th Street to the south, are similarly embellished.
Page 411
Page 4 of 11
3
0
3
7
Figure 2: Typical Elevation Excerpt
Additionally, the street-facing corners of Buildings 1 and 2 feature office tower elements consisting
of insulated vision glass and spandrel glass, with a metal canopy. Building 2 features a similar
office tower element for its office space located on the western side of the building and replicates
it visually on the eastern side to create symmetry. The project provides a visually consistent color
pallet, which includes “Pure White Field Color” (Sherwin Williams SW 7005), “Online” (Sherwin
Williams SW 7072), and “Network Gray” (Sherwin Williams SW 7073).
The majority of the project site will be secured with an 8’ high tube steel fence. 8’ tilt-up concrete
screen walls will be used to screen parking from view. Additionally, a combination retaining wall
and 8’ concrete tilt-up screen wall will be constructed to better screen the project from view of the
residential units on the northwestern corner of the project site.
As previously noted, the proposed project was deemed complete on June 16, 2021, and is thus
being reviewed against the development standards in effect on that date. At that time, the
subject parcels were located in the General Industrial (GI) zoning district. The proposed project
exceeds all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown
in the table below:
Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height
Maximum 35 feet (at front
setback) and
75 feet (1-foot increment
from the front setback
line)
Building 1: 40 feet; Building 2:
36 feet; Building 3: 36 feet YES
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)40% - 60%
Building 1: 49.47%; Building
2: 42.59%; Building 3:
51.21%
YES
Front Building
Setback
25 feet (9th Street);
25 feet (Baker Ave)
Building 1: ~269 feet
(9th Street);
Building 3: ~150 feet (Baker
Ave)
YES
Street Side Setback 35 feet (Vineyard Ave)Building 1: ~166 feet; YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
35 feet (Vineyard Ave);
25 feet (9th Street);
25 feet (Baker Ave)
43.71 feet (Vineyard Ave);
37.8 feet (9th Street);
42.61 feet (Baker Ave)
YES
Parking Setback 20 feet (Vineyard Ave);~39 feet (Vineyard Ave);YES
Page 412
Page 5 of 11
3
0
3
7
Parking: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, 17.64.090 and Table 17.64.050-1,
which was in place when the project site was located within the General Industrial zone, auto
parking for warehouse/storage uses is based on a tiered ratio as illustrated in the table below. In
addition, office areas require parking at 1 stall per 250 square feet. Further, the development code
requires 1 trailer loading stall for each dock door proposed. As such, the proposed project is
required to provide 188 auto parking stalls and 94 trailer loading stalls for Building 1, 62 auto
parking stalls and 12 trailer loading stalls for Building 2, and 105 auto parking stalls and 28 trailer
stalls for Building 3. The table below demonstrates the project’s compliance with all parking
standards:
Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Complies?
Warehouse/storage
and office
1 per 1,000 sf for the first
20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf
for the next 20,000 sf, and
1 per 4,000 sf for
remaining sf
Office requires 1 per 250
sf
Building 1:
188 stalls;
Building 2:
62 stalls;
Building 3:
105 stalls
Building 1:
192; Building
2: 62; Building
3: 108
YES
Trailer Loading
Stalls 1 per loading dock
Building 1:
94; Building
2: 12;
Building 3:
28
Building 1:
126; Building
2: 12; Building
3: 30
YES
Traffic Improvements: Based on the non-CEQA transportation study prepared by Fehr and Peers
(May 2024), which for thoroughness purposes has been included with the Draft EIR as Appendix
K-2, the project would result in increased traffic delays at three intersections: Vineyard Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, and Baker Avenue and 8th Street. To
ensure that these intersections maintain sufficient level of services, the transportation study found
that the project applicant shall be required to provide traffic improvements, including signal timing
optimization at both the Vineyard Avenue and Foothill and Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route
intersections, as well as construct a new traffic signal and reconfigured striping at Baker Avenue
and 8th Street to allow a southbound dedicated left-turn lane and shared through-right-turn-lane,
and to restripe the eastbound approach to have a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through-
right-turn lane.
15 feet (9th Street);
15 feet (Baker Ave)
~28 feet (9th Street);
~45 feet (Baker Ave)
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet
Building 1: ~136 feet;
Building 2: ~45 feet;
Building 3: ~56 feet both
sides
YES
Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet
Building 1: ~185 feet
Building 2: ~40 feet
Building 3: ~26 Feet
YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10%11.9%YES
Page 413
Page 6 of 11
3
0
3
7
Entitlements for Proposed Development: The project requires a Design Review, Tentative Parcel
Map, Conditional Use Permit, and Certificate of Appropriateness. Further, the applicant proposes
to enter into a Development Agreement with the City, which requires the review and approval of
an ordinance by the City Council.
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173): As mentioned, the project includes a request to approve
a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the subject site into four new parcels. Parcel 1 proposes an
area of approximately 28 acres with street frontage along 9th street and Vineyard Avenue. Parcel
2 proposes an area of approximately 6 acres with street access via parcels 1 and 3. Parcel 3
proposes an area of approximately 12 acres with street frontage along Baker Avenue. Parcel 4
proposes an area of approximately 1 acre with street frontage on Baker Avenue. Notably, all
proposed parcels meet the minimum development standards for lot size and configuration which
were in place prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982.
Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009): While the other entitlements are exempt from
Ordinance 982, these applications did not address the potential uses/tenants for the project
because the project is being building on a speculative basis. Therefore, no pending use permit
application was deemed complete prior to the effective date of Ordinance 982, and future uses
by tenants who occupy the building will be subject to current standards under Ordinance 982.
Thus, the applicant is requesting the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit subject to
Development Code Section Table 17.30.030-1 to allow the following uses at the site: Wholesale
Distribution – Medium; Distribution/Fulfillment Center; E-Commerce Distribution; Storage
Warehouse and Manufacturing, Light-Large.
Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) regarding the Baker House: The Baker House
was constructed in 1952 and was designated a historic landmark by the city in 2014. Pursuant to
Historic Preservation Commission Resolution 14-01 as approved on April 23rd, 2014, the Baker
House represents one of the few surviving examples of the Folk Architecture style in the city. As
it relates to this project, the Baker House will be subdivided and dedicated to the City and the
structure will be renovated and repurposed for City use. As it relates to proposed changes to the
Baker House itself, the exterior of the Baker House is to be renovated so as to maintain the
structure’s character defining features. Specifically, existing mortar is to be reviewed and
repointed as structurally required. The existing concrete sills will be repaired and maintained. The
front and rear entrances will be installed with new doors. Existing roofing will be removed,
evaluated, and replaced as structurally necessary, while maintaining the existing materials and
style. The existing concrete front porch will be maintained, except for the removal of steps on the
eastern side to be replaced with an ADA-compliant ramp. Currently the Baker House features
aluminum-frame window inserts set into the original wooden frames. The existing aluminum-frame
window inserts are to be removed, and new windows installed using the original wooden frames.
The developer also proposes additional improvements to the Baker House structure and parcel.
See “Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266)” section below.
Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266): The developer has also proposed to enter into a
Development Agreement with the city. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.060.A.1,
development agreements:
1. Increase the certainty in the approval of development projects, thereby preventing the
waste of resources, reducing the cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging
investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public;
2. Provide assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies,
Page 414
Page 7 of 11
3
0
3
7
rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval thereby strengthening the
public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive planning,
and reducing the economic costs of development;
3. Enable the city to plan for and finance public facilities, including but not limited to, streets,
sewerage, transportation, drinking water, school and utility facilities, thereby removing a
serious impediment to the development of new housing.
The proposed Development Agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following major terms
which are summarized below:
The term of the development agreement would initially be eight years, with an option for
the applicant to extend the term by an additional two years upon payment of $1 million
dollars, provided the developer meets certain criteria;
A requirement for future tenants to designate Rancho Cucamonga as the point of sale for
the material handling equipment used in Project’s operations;
A requirement that the developer shall pay a “Community Benefit Fee,” totaling
$5,000,000 in order to address the Project’s expected impacts on affordable housing
demand, future greenhouse gas emissions, fire protection services, environmental justice
and related impacts typically associated with large warehouse development.
The applicant has agreed to rehabilitate the Baker House and improve the Baker House
structure to a tenant “shell.” The developer has also agreed to improve the Baker House
property with new parking and landscaping and dedicate the property to the City by grant
deed for future City use. It should be noted that a specific use for this future structure has
not yet been determined by the City. A conceptual site plan for the Baker House parcel
is included with the draft Development Agreement as Exhibit C.
Staff notes that the Development Agreement included with this staff report is in draft form and that
final language on certain points is currently being resolved. This process will be complete prior to
the project going to public hearing before the City Council.
Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant has hosted two neighborhood meetings related to this
project. The first neighborhood meeting was held on April 22, 2022. At this meeting, the primary
concern expressed by residents and attendees was truck traffic related to the proposed project.
In response to these concerns, the applicant modified the project to prohibit truck ingress and
egress at the Baker Avenue driveways. Further, the applicant also modified the project to limit
truck turns from the 9th Street driveway to “right only,” so as to avoid trucks traveling through the
existing surrounding residential neighborhoods.
The second neighborhood meeting was held on August 8, 2024. Again, concerns were raised
related to traffic and truck trips. Other general comments included concerns over proposed
tenants of the buildings and hours of operation, and the extension of the City’s fiber optic cable
network. One resident expressed concern over wall height between their adjacent residential
property to the north and the project site. The applicant responded by clarifying that the project
site itself will be served by fiber optic cable, and that an 8-foot tall screen wall will be constructed
in between the concerned neighbor and the project.
Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (DRC) (Boling & Daniels) reviewed
the project on December 17, 2024. No members of the public attended the meeting to speak on
the item. At the meeting, the Design Review Committee asked questions related to the anticipated
circulation of trucks and vehicles traveling to and from all three buildings. The Committee
recommended that project move forward to the Planning Commission, but that the developer
Page 415
Page 8 of 11
3
0
3
7
consider revising the site plan to accommodate additional on-site truck queueing. Accordingly,
staff has added a condition of approval reflecting the DRC’s recommendation that the developer
shall revise the site plan to better accommodate onsite truck queueing and provide plans for staff
review and approval prior to building permit issuance.
Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement provided in Chapter 17.124 of the
Development Code. As an industrial development, this project would typically include artwork that
has a minimum value that meets or exceeds one dollar per square foot. In this case, and in
accordance with the proposed Development Agreement, all but $150,000 of the public art
requirement shall be considered satisfied due to the developer agreeing to rehabilitate and
improve the Baker House. This $150,000 to be contributed by the developer toward public art
may be satisfied by either payment of an in lieu fee or installation of art to be located on site at a
valuation of $150,000.
Environmental Assessment
Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(SCH #2019110456), has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is
to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a
project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public
participation. The contents of the EIR become a planning tool for the Planning Commission and
City Council to use in determining the appropriate and best land use for the project site.
The intent of the EIR is to address and evaluate potentially significant impacts of the proposed
project and identify feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce
or eliminate these impacts. A summary of all of the project-related impacts and the recommended
mitigation measures is provided in the Final EIR. The following summarizes key points in the
environmental review process:
Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting: The Notice of Preparation (NOP) serves as
public notification that an EIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible
agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the
document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the
purpose of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the
scope of the Draft EIR. The public scoping meeting is to receive public testimony on those issues
that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as it relates to the project and environment.
Accordingly, a notice advertising both the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting was prepared for the
project and circulated on November 18th, 2019 to the State Clearinghouse (SCH # 2019110456),
public agencies, Native American tribes, those interested parties who had previously requested
notification, and all property owners within 660 feet of the subject site. The notice advertising the
NOP and the public scoping meeting was also published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on
December 4th, 2020 and made publicly available on the city’s website. The Public Scoping
Meeting was held in-person at City Hall on December 12th, 2019. No members of the public or
any interested parties provided comments at the Public Scoping Meeting. The public comment
period to respond to the NOP closed on December 18th, 2019 and a comment letter was received
from the State of California Department of Justice Attorney General. Written responses to all
significant environmental issues raised were prepared and made available in the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).
Page 416
Page 9 of 11
3
0
3
7
Following the scoping meeting and the preparation of all environmental documents, the Draft EIR
was circulated for a mandatory 45-day public review starting on March 15, 2022, and concluding
on May 2, 2022. In response to this review, public concerns were raised regarding the content
and adequacy of the analysis prepared for the original EIR. The primary public concern involved
the inclusion of emissions credits from structures which had previously existed at the site, but that
were not occupied. Further, those structures were demolished between February and April 2022.
Because the project site is now vacant and undeveloped, except for the Baker House, the decision
was made to update technical studies for air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas
emissions, noise, and transportation based on the current site conditions. Accordingly, the DEIR
was then recirculated and distributed for a new 45-day public review period on June 20th, 2024,
with the comment period concluding on August 5th, 2024. A Notice of Availability including
electronic links to the DEIR and all technical appendices was posted at the County, published in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet, mailed to
interested parties requesting such notification and posted on the city’s website on June 20th, 2024.
Further, and also on June 20th, 2024, the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided to the
State Clearinghouse via the online “CEQAnet” portal for distribution to Responsible and Trustee
agencies and hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public
review at the following locations:
Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730;
Paul A Biane Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739;
Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Comments on the recirculated DEIR were received from the Southern California Gas Company,
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the California Air Resources Board
(CARB), Advocates for the Environment, Blum, Collins & Ho LLP, the City of Ontario, and the
Department of Public Works. Additionally, several comments were received from individual
residents living near the project area. The administrative DEIR and FEIR, inclusive of these
various comments listed above, as well as responses to these comments, are included with this
staff report as Exhibit C. Technical appendices and supporting documentation can be referenced
on the City‘s website under the tab ”CEQA Documents Available for Review“ under the Current
Projects & Planning Initiatives which can be accessed here: https://www.cityofrc.us/community-
development/planning
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP): In compliance with CEQA, a mitigation
monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) has been prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program
that identifies each adopted mitigation measure that reduces the significance level of a particular
impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure.
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration: The EIR concludes that the
construction and implementation of this project will result in two significant and unavoidable
impacts pursuant to Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form of the CEQA Statute and
Guidelines, namely Land Use and Planning (Appendix G, Section XI) and Noise (Appendix G,
Section XIII).
Regarding impacts to Land Use and Planning, CEQA Statue and Guidelines Appendix G, Section
XI requires a determination of whether a project would cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect. Staff notes that General Plan policy LC-7.4 discourages
Page 417
Page 10 of 11
3
0
3
7
large industrial projects to be located within 1,000 feet of existing and planned residential
development. As proposed, the project will measure approximately 50 feet from the nearest
existing residence. Thus, the project is in conflict with the City’s land use plan and would result in
a significant unavoidable impact. Despite this, however, staff notes that the proposed project area
has been zoned for industrial use since at least the 1980s and the proposed project remains
consistent with all applicable zoning standards for development within the Neo-Industrial zone.
Regarding impacts to Noise, CEQA Statute and Guidelines Appendix G, Section XIII requires a
determination of whether a project would result in generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies. Staff notes that the operational characteristics of the proposed project will result in a
significant and unavoidable impact to noise. Specifically, as the developer anticipates the
proposed buildings to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, anticipated noise generated from
the use would be 60.2 decibels (dBA) as measured at nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), as
measured from the residences located along the north side of 9th Street. Further, noise thresholds
will also be exceeded in Ontario, specifically as measured from the residences located on the
southside of 8th Street. Whereas the City of Ontario establishes nighttime thresholds of 49 dBA
(10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), which is the current measured ambient noise level, operations from the
project will result in approximately 58 dBA at this location along the southside of 8th Street. As
such, the operational characteristics of the proposed project will exceed the noise thresholds for
both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario.
In accordance with CEQA, the City has prepared Findings and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations, which is included with this staff report as Exhibit C. This document explains the
various environmental impacts of the project.
Correspondence:
A notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on October 29, 2025,
notices were mailed to all property owners within 1,500 feet of the project site on October 28,
2025, and the site was posted with notices for this public hearing on October 30, 2025. As of the
writing of this report, staff has not received any inquiries.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is
shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the Project site when
constructed and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The
proposed Project will also allow for the development of new warehouse facilities to the benefit of
the community by growing its jobs base and tax revenue. The Project proponent will also be
responsible for paying permit and impact fees, in addition to other fees required by the
Development Agreement associated with the project, such as community benefit fees.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing
and anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the city with
new industrial warehouse facilities which will attract quality tenants, the project also results in the
restoration and preservation of a historic structure, the Baker House, to the benefit of the
community.
Page 418
Page 11 of 11
3
0
3
7
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph
Exhibit B – Link to Project Plans
Exhibit C – Link to CEQA Documents (DEIR, FEIR, Appendices, Findings, SOC, and MMRP)
Exhibit D – DRC Comments and Minutes Dated December 17, 2024
Exhibit E – Draft Development Agreement
Exhibit F – Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval
Page 419
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 1 of 6
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission
Agenda
November 12, 2025
Draft Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.
The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on
November 12, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:03 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp,
Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.
Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director; Sean
McPherson, Principal Planner; Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer; Jared Knight, Assistant Planner;
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chairman Morales opened the public communications.
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of October 22, 2025.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
D. Public Hearings
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DESIGN REVIEW, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – CP
LOGISTICS VINEYARD, LLC – A Recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to allow for the
development of three (3) concrete tilt-up industrial buildings totaling approximately 982,096 square feet on
approximately 45.96 net acres bound by Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue
to the west, and the BNSF/Metrolink railroad line to the south; APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -
94, -96, -97. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was prepared for the project. Primary
Case File No. DRC2019-00742.
Principal Planner McPherson provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that the draft
resolution contained grammatical errors which included incomplete APN references. In addition, the title of the
Conditions of Approval was amended. No other changes were made aside from the title block. Commissioners
received a redlined version of the changes on the dais for review.
Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.
Page 420
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 2 of 6
Applicant Sizemore was present and available to answer questions.
The following individuals spoke in support of the project: Wyatt Stiles, Amy Smith, Eddie Campos, Louie
Lopez, Steven Salazar, and Robert, also known as ”Maddog”.
The following individuals expressed questions about the project: Felicia Zhu and Dick Takemoto. Their
concerns included:
• Noise and suggested to install a 10-12 feet block wall to mitigate it
• Privacy
• Pollution
• Type of manufacturing business proposed
• Traffic
• School children’s safety
For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences were received after the preparation of the
agenda packet and the following comments are noted. The actual correspondence should be referred to
for details:
• Email from Advocates for the Environment, withdrawing their comment letters, indicating they no
longer oppose the project.
• Email from Judy Summers expressing truck traffic and safety concerns for the school children.
• Email and a hard copy from Steven Piepkorn with Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance,
expressing environmental concerns and requesting that a new Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
be drafted and circulated. This correspondence also included a letter previously provided as part
of the FEIR process from Gary Ho with Blum, Collins & Ho, LLP, on behalf of Golden State
Environmental Justice Alliance dated August 2, 2024.
Applicant provided an explanation on the following:
• Block Wall – The City’s development code allows a maximum wall height of 8 ft.; however, a minor
exception permits a height of up to 10 ft. Staff would have to review a request for a minor exception
separately since it is not part of the project application. which the developer intends to pursue at a
later date.
• Noise – stating that the proposed screen wall will diminish the sound.
• Type of business proposed – Does not have an end user.
• Traffic – Installation of traffic signals at 8th and Baker and other traffic improvements is expected to
minimize traffic concerns and reduce congestion.
Commissioner Dopp stated that his contention with projects like this is that trucks need to get to the freeway
the quickest route accessible and going north is prohibited by the city in numerous ways. It creates undue
burdens. He said the preferred method is south. He asked how developer intends to prevent trucks from
going into the northern parts of the city where it is more residential.
Applicant answered that it is 5-mile stretch to go through stop sign-controlled intersections through very
narrow roadways. He said they have a truck routing plan, and tenants are on a tight schedule as they want
their goods dropped off fast. He said along the northernly bounds they are improving Vineyard/Arrow and
Foothill Blvd. with a single authorization which will make things better. In terms of the restriction on
northbound traffic, he does not have the ability to control it.
Commissioner Dopp stated that from a general understanding, warehouses still have a big impact on
neighborhoods, particularly in the southwest part of the city. He mentioned to the applicant that the EIR
expressed alternate avenues for development outside of just pure warehouses. He is not convinced that
the warehouse furthest to the west is not going to have a negative impact on the quality of life to the
residents in those neighborhoods. He asked the applicant if there was any consideration to do something
other than a warehouse, as opposed to making all three buildings warehouse developments.
Applicant responded that it seemed to be the most efficient layout, and it made more sense to them than
other layouts. They did everything they could within reason to produce a good project that is as low of an
impact as possible given the location to the neighbors.
Page 421
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 3 of 6
Commissioner Daniels asked the applicant whether the public art funds allocated for renovating the 1-acre
property would be sufficient for their proposed plans.
Applicant confirmed.
Vice Chairman Boling referred to the submitted comments and requested clarification for the benefit of the
public and future readers of the minutes, on one issue: the visibility of the truck docks and bays from the
street.
Applicant explained that at street level, there is an 8-foot wall which was the maximum allowed. As the site
slopes to the south, additional grade lowers the truck docks below both street level and the base of the wall,
resulting in no visibility of the trucks.
Hearing no other comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing.
Commissioner Dopp expressed that he has a problem with warehouse projects being close to residential
areas due to their potential impact. He expressed his opinion regarding logistic jobs versus manufacturing,
or strong blue-collar jobs, expressing that in the long-term, these tend to be lower wage jobs. He expressed
concern that 9th Street may struggle to accommodate the traffic. He noted that given the zoning, his primary
concern is Building 3, which is closest to the residential area. He appreciates the community development
fee but if this project does go forward to Council, he has a question about why $5 million dollars would be
enough to mitigate some of the harm to the southwest community.
He also expressed that he likes what they did with the Baker House. The more that can be done for historic
preservation, the stronger the benefit in the long term. Commissioner Dopp then expressed that he was
unsure how he might vote.
Commissioner Daniels stated that these projects are always somewhat difficult because the zoning has
been there for approximately 45 years. There are a lot of residential homes in the area, and he believes
the developer tried to mitigate it as much as possible. He commended the developer for doing the
conditional use permit upfront. He questioned Development Agreement Section 11.E, specifically the in-
lieu fee. He expressed that they did a very good job with the architect, but questions continue to come up
relating to traffic. He asked Engineering staff for an explanation as to why 9th and Vineyard was not
indicated in the traffic study.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor answered that based on the study of the traffic impact analysis, the two
intersections to be optimized is Vineyard/Foothill and Vineyard/Arrow, but Vineyard/9th is not indicated due
to some of the re-stripping that will take place at that intersection where trucks will be going south and not
necessarily north.
Commissioner Daniels stated that because of the zoning, the developer did a very good job mitigating any
impacts. Although, it is unfortunate, there is residential around the project. He commends the developer
for the job they have done and the time it has taken. He expressed his support.
Commissioner Diaz concurred with the other Commissioners that warehouse projects tend to be difficult
due to their negative impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, particularly residential areas, however, it is
zoned properly, and it complies with everything it needs to comply with. There have been comments made
about working close to home. She told the developer that it is important to the community that the jobs
these tenants are providing are sustainable wages for people to be able to live in this community. One of
the positive impacts of this development is that we can have people work close to home and create an even
more positive impact in that neighborhood.
Vice Chairman Boling highlighted that in the Conditions of Approval, Building and Safety’s number one
condition calls out for connection on the three developed parcels. He asked if Baker House is on sewer.
Principal Engineer Sotomayor answered that he is not certain at this time.
Page 422
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 4 of 6
Vice Chairman Boling mentioned that if it is not, he suggests getting it put on sewer before the city takes
possession of the property. He said that this is an interesting site we have within the project boundaries
proposed, industrial, as well as business park, and residential. This is the typical interface we like to see
where the residential is right next to a business park, which has been successful, and businesses there
have been flourishing. The developer has done a good job in stepping down the magnitude of the buildings
as it approaches the residential area. He commended the applicant for doing the best he can in pushing
truck traffic in one direction away from the residential neighborhoods. The geography of where we are
located, with its proximity to the freeways, major rail lines, and international airport almost forces us to
consider projects like this because of the major infrastructure the region has invested in. There are
concerns where it is placed but the need for development like this exists and they have done a good job
with the concerns of the community.
He asked for clarification earlier with regard to the truck dock and bays for a specific purpose, in reference
to the letter received from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and there were several assertions
in that letter with reference to CEQA concerns. In this public hearing tonight, we have identified that at
least one of those assertions was a falsehood at their assertion that the truck bay is visible from the street,
which does not exist. He wanted those in the audience to understand that people can assert anything but
what is important is to have the facts to back it up and often times, organizations like that do not have the
facts to back up their assertions or statements. He expressed that the architecture looks great. The project
fits in and elevates the surrounding community, as it pertains to the business park, as well as the larger
buildings to the north. He hopes they get the right tenants there at the right time.
Principal Planner McPherson mentioned that in regard to utility connections, Engineering Condition
Approval number 30 requires separate utility services to each parcel, including sanitary sewer systems.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that given that, Building and Safety’s requirement for all three developed
parcels to connect to the public sewer appears redundant, as the same requirement is already addressed
in Engineering conditions 29 and 30.
Principal Planner Confirmed.
Chairman Morales thanked the developer for working with staff to come up with the best development
possible for that piece of land. He thanked them for being a responsible developer committed to hiring
skilled labor. Also, he liked the Baker House restoration as a community benefit because he is sure they
will use it in the future. He is in support of the project.
Commissioner Dopp stated that there was a discussion regarding a minor exception for a 10-feet wall
adjacent to Building 3 on the north side. He asked staff when the appropriate time would be to bring it up.
Planning Director Nakamura replied that the minor exception is a separate entitlement and is assigned at
the administrative level. She does not think it would be appropriate for the Commission to require them to
apply for a minor exception because it has not been reviewed for the necessary conditions. She said it
would be best to allow the developer and staff to better understand what the final needs are in order to
make the wall work for everyone involved. She said we do not want to guarantee approval on something
that has not yet been fully evaluated.
Commissioner Daniels asked to confirm that an 8-foot wall is what is being proposed tonight.
Principal Planner confirmed.
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution 2025-039
recommending that to City Council approve Design Review DRC2019-00742, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM20173, Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 and Development Agreement DRC2022-00266,
as amended in the resolution and the conditions of approval. Motion carried, 4-1, with Commissioner Dopp
voting no.
Page 423
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 5 of 6
D2. Consideration of a General Plan Amendment and Municipal Code Amendment to Amend the General
Plan Land Use and Community Character Chapter related to Floor Area Ratio on Table LC-1 and Policies
Relating to Block Lengths; Amend the General Plan Mobility and Access Chapter to add Dimension
Standards for Street Typologies, Remove the Proposed 8th Street Trail and Amend the Truck Routes Map
Pursuant to AB98; Amend Municipal Code Table 17.130.050-1 to Update Floor Area Ratio and Ground
Floor Use Regulations for Form Based Zones; and Amend Municipal Code Section 17.138.030 Regarding
Block Length for Form Based Zones. An Addendum to the General Plan EIR Has Been Prepared for this
Project. This item will be forwarded to City Council for Final Action. Continued from the October 22, 2025,
Planning Commission Meeting (DRC2025-00255, DRC2025-00256).
Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).
Commissioner Daniels mentioned that with eliminating the mandate for the Floor Area Ratio, he believes the
developer will not comply if it is not mandated.
Planning Director Nakamura mentioned we would have a dimensional standard for what that ground floor has
to be. The developer can always do more than what would be proposed and required under these standards.
She reiterated that this is a floor, not a ceiling, that is being proposed.
Vice Chairman Boling stated that by eliminating the requirement and categorizing it as a target, if the City later
finds that developers are not coming close to meeting that target, nothing will prevent the City from taking the
same steps it is taking now–amending the code-to revise the target or ultimately establish a hard minimum.
Planning Director Nakamura confirmed and said this is just to get back to what it originally was intended to be.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned as a follow-up that for some of the more intensive uses on the matrix, the real
problem for him is that he understands the argument, he has seen time and time again that these housing
developers of these housing projects will waive it away if they do not want to do it
Planning Director Nakamura asked him to clarify what he is expecting to see in some of those environments that
would be different that would create these community buildings.
Commissioner Dopp mentioned the city center or city corridor is more intensive. These are parcels in the
General Plan where the city said we want higher quality development. Therefore, the floor area ratios need to
be very high to support a mix of retail, commercial, restaurant use, and maybe office space.
Planning Director Nakamura clarified that it is required in any of the center or corridor designations, regardless
of whether it is off of Foothill and Haven.
Commissioner Dopp stated that he still believes, even with the ground floor requirements, that we will not come
anywhere near those Floor Area Ratio targets for those specific zones.
Planning Director Nakamura provided an example of the city center parcel.
Commissioner Diaz asked if we reduce the floor area ratio to what it is now, can a developer still use density
bonus law to do all the things they want to do.
Planning Director Nakamura answered that they can always use state bonus density law to waive certain
standards.
Chairman Morales reopened the public hearing.
Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed public hearing.
Page 424
HPC/PC Draft Minutes
Page 6 of 6
Commissioner Dopp stated the biggest discussion seen from the Commission is what the intended target
is. At the end of the day, he understands that we have seen a lot of projects that involve some parts of that
metric. For him, the biggest thing about this specific amendment is that he does not think we could lose
that tool as a strategy for some of these developments. If we are going to use ground floor non-residential
as a strategy, his recommendation would be to continue to encourage mixed-use in these areas, take a
second look at some of the corridor centers, and maybe extend the language beyond just Foothill and
Haven.
Planning Director Nakamura, due to a possible misunderstanding, clarified that this is not a strategy but an actual
requirement that is going to be required by code. She explained that the corridor fronting retail requirement is an
actual linear designation on the zoning map, applicable to Foothill and Haven. What it did is break up where
they wanted retail only on the corners and then any other non-commercial could be further away from the
corners, and that is being collapsed so it could be any sort of commercial use because it was becoming far too
complicated for everybody to program it that way. She said the 15-foot minimum ground floor requirement
applies not only to Foothill and Haven, but to all corridor designations and all center designations.
Chairman Morales stated that the changes are positive and reflecting public input received over the years.
He noted that it has often been challenging to fill the ground-floor spaces. He expressed support for
considering preparations for bus rapid transit options as they arise.
Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling to adopt Resolution 2025-040
and 2025-041 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Municipal Code Amendments. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. Director Announcements
Planning Director Nakamura mentioned that there will not be a second meeting in November and that the
Commission will reconvene in December.
F. Commission Announcements - None
G. Adjournment
Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling, seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adjourn the meeting.
Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department
Approved:
Page 425
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00742,
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20173, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT DRC2022-00009, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2022-00266, AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
DRC2019-00854 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE NEW
INDUSJRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALLING 982,096 SQUARE FEET
ON A CERTAIN 45.96 ACRE PROPERTY BOUNDED BY
VINEYARD AVENUE TO THE EAST, 9TH STREET TO THE
NORTH, BAKER AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND BNSF/
METROLINK RAILROAD TO THE SOUTH. APNS: 0207-271-25, - 27,
-39, -40, -89, -93, -9 4, -96, AND -97
A.Recitals.
1.The applicant, CP Logistics Vineyard LLC, filed an application for the approval of
Design Review DRC2019-00742, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173, Conditional Use
Permit DRC2022-00009, Development Agreement DRC2022-00266, and Certificate of
Appropriateness DRC2019-00854 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application."
2.On the 12th of November 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application recommending
that the City Council approve the proposed project and concluded said hearing on that
date recommending that the City Council approve the project as proposed by a four-to-
one vote.
3.On the 17th of December 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
4.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B.Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1.This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2025, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 45.96-acre project site is bounded by Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th
Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west, and the BNSF/Metrolink railroad to the
south; and
b.The project site includes a historic structure hereafter referred to as the Baker
Attachment 5
Page 426
House, located at 8803 Baker Avenue. The Baker House is currently owned by CP Logistics
Vineyard LLC and is not currently in use; and
c. The application is for the development of three new industrial warehouse
buildings to be located on three new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 611,574
square feet including approximately 4,000 square feet of office space, Building 2 will total
approximately 107,541 square feet including approximately 4,000 square feet of office space,
and Building 3 will total approximately 262,981 square feet including approximately 5,000
square feet of office space. The project is in compliance with the applicable parking development
standards and provides 362 parking stalls and 168 trailer parking stalls; and
d. The application includes the subdivision of the project site into four new parcels
to accommodate the proposed new buildings and the Baker House: Parcel 1 which will total
approximately 28 acres and will be developed with Building 1, Parcel 2 which will total
approximately 6 acres and will be developed with Building 2, Parcel 3 which will total
approximately 12 acres and be improved with Building 3, and Parcel 4 which totals approximately
1 acre and will include the Baker House; and
e. The application includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the
following uses to operate at the site: Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light - Large;
and
f. The project also includes the rehabilitation of the Baker House, in compliance
with the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Places for future use by the
city. Pursuant to the Certificate of Appropriateness, the city will review the rehabilitation and future
use in conformance with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance; and
g. The project also includes a Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266) which
is memorialized upon the approval of related Ordinance XX and which is hereby included with
this Resolution by reference; and
h. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project
site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site
Vacant
Neo-Industrial
Employment
(NI) District
Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
Industrial,
Residential,
Open Space
Neighborhood
Center, Neo-
Industrial
Employment (NI),
Suburban
Neighborhood Low,
Industrial
Employment (IE),
General Open
Space and Facilities (OS)
Industrial Employment (IE), Neo-
Industrial (NI), Parks (P),
Neighborhood General 3-Limited
(NG3-L), Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC), Medium
Residential (M)
Page 427
South
BNSF Railway,
Industrial,
Residential,
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neo-Industrial
Employment (NI);
Low Density
Residential (within
Ontario),
Neighborhood
Commercial
(within Ontario)
Neo-Industrial (NI); Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) (within Ontario),
Low Density Residential (LDR5)
(within Ontario)
West Residential Traditional
Neighborhood District Low Medium Residential (LM)
East Industrial and
Cucamonga Creek
Open Space (OS) and Neo-Industrial Employment (NI)
Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC),
Neo-Industrial (NI)
3. The City Council hereby approves Design Review DRC2019-00742 as a part of the
application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section
17.20.040 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The project
site's General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo Industrial Employment. This land use
designation supports industrial uses and the proposed industrial buildings have been designed
such that they will have minimal impact upon neighboring residential and commercial uses.
Uses of similar scale are also present nearby; and
b. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is located within the
Neo-Industrial (NI) zone, which promotes light industrial uses with low environmental impacts,
and allows for the operation of Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light - Large
uses with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Further, civic uses are permitted by right
relative to any future City use of the Baker House building; and
c. The proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code for the zone in which it is located. The project was deemed complete on
June 16th, 2021, prior to the adoption of the most current zoning and development standards.
At the time it was deemed complete, the project site was located within the General Industrial
(GI) Zone. As such, the development standards that applied to the General Industrial (GI) zone
on June 16, 2021, apply. The project complies with all applicable development standards for
the General Industrial Zone as of June 16, 2021; and
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review determines that the majority of
impacts created by the project will be mitigated to less than significant levels, with the
exception of related noise impacts which will exceed thresholds even with mitigations. The
project also results in a significant and unavoidable impact related to land use planning and
recommended proximity of industrial uses to residential neighborhoods. The Planning
Commission recognizes that these impacts require the City Council to adopt a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, balancing these impacts against the project's economic
development, job creation and infrastructure improvements benefits that align with the City's
long-term goals.
Page 428
4. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173 as
part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code
Section 16.20.060 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives
of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The
proposal is to subdivide a vacant property of approximately 45.96 acres into 4 numbered
parcels for the purpose of industrial development and preservation and future use of the Baker
House. The project site's General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo Industrial Employment.
This land use designation supports industrial uses with a reduced or minimal impact upon
adjacent residential uses. Community/Civic uses are also permitted by right in this zone. The
proposed industrial buildings have been designed such that they will have minimal impact
upon neighboring residential and commercial uses. Uses of similar scale are also present
nearby; and
b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code for the zone in which it is located. The project was deemed complete
on June 16th, 2021, prior to the adoption of the most current zoning and development
standards. At the time it was deemed complete, the project site was located within the General
Industrial (GI) Zone. As such, the development standards that applied to the General Industrial
(GI) zone on June 16, 2021, apply. The General Industrial zoning district required lots of a
minimum area of half an acre, and a minimum width of 100 feet. The lots proposed by the
tentative parcel map are all in excess of 1 acre in area and 100 feet in width. The project
complies with all applicable development standards for the General Industrial district; and
c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental
impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
5. The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 as part
of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to Development Code Section
17.20.060 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan. The project site's
General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo-lndustrial Employment (NI), which permits the
proposed industrial use.
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is located within the
Neo-lndustrial (NI) zone, which promotes light industrial uses with low environmental impacts,
and allows for the operation of Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light -
Large uses with an approved Conditional Use Permit; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use
being proposed, including access, utilities, and absence of physical constraints that would
make conduct of the proposed use undesirable. The project site is well suited to the proposed
industrial uses as it is located along multiple street frontages, thereby providing multiple
points of ingress/egress and emergency services access; and
Page 429
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use
would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including
transportation and service facilities. The proposed use is of a similar type, size, and intensity
as existing industrial uses in the vicinity; and
e. The proposed use will not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to detrimental
to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to
persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is
located. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts
related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. Where there exist significant and unavoidable impacts,
specifically relative to noise and land use planning relative to the proximity of industrial uses
near residential neighborhoods, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been
prepared for the City Council's consideration in order to weigh these impacts with the
anticipated benefits of the project; and
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including
police, fire, streets, and other public utilities. The applicant shall provide traffic improvements
to ensure that surrounding public streets and intersections maintain sufficient levels of service
during construction and operation of the proposed buildings.
6. The City Council hereby approves Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2019-00854,
and makes the following findings pursuant to Development Code Section 17.18.040 in support
of the recommendation:
a. The proposed rehabilitation will not result in a substantial adverse change to
the historic resource within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Due to vandalism and deterioration of existing materials, replacement of mortar, roofing,
doors, and windows may be necessary in order to rehabilitate the historic structure. All
required replacement of existing materials shall be done with materials that closely match the
original materials in appearance, texture, and color, ensuring the preservation of the
structure's historic character. Upon implementation of these measures to preserve the
structure, the future community/civic use of this structure will not result in substantial adverse
change to the historic resource; and
b. The project is consistent with the purposes of the Historic Preservation
Commission, and more specifically Development Code Sections 17.18.030 (Maintenance of
Historic Resources) and 17.18.040 (Certificate of Appropriateness). The project aligns with
the intent of these regulations by maintaining the architectural integrity of the historic
structure. The proposed rehabilitation, including the replacement materials, will preserve the
visual character of the structure as an example of "Folk Architecture". This rehabilitation will
increase the longevity of the structure and allow for its use as a public resource; and
c. The project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties by complying with the applicable Standards for
Rehabilitation. Standard 2 states, "the historic character of a property shall be retained and
preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial
relationships that characterize a property will be avoided." The applicant proposes to
rehabilitate the existing historical structure through the removal of graffiti and the replacement
of deteriorated or missing structural elements with materials that are substantially the same
as the original materials. Standard 6 states, "deteriorated historic features shall be repaired
rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive
feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and where possible,
Page 430
materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary and
physical evidence." The brick-and-mortar construction of the historic structure is a distinctive
feature of the folk architecture style. In order to maintain this distinctive feature, it is necessary
to evaluate and replace the mortar where required to ensure the longevity of the historic
resource.
7. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and
determinations in connection with the approval of the application:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2019110456), has been prepared for this
project. The EIR was circulated for public review starting on March 15, 2022, and
concluding on May 2, 2022. In response to this review, public concerns were raised
regarding the content and adequacy of the analysis prepared for the original EIR. The
primary public concern involved the inclusion of emissions credits from structures which
had previously existed on the site, but that were not occupied. Further, those structures
were demolished between February and April 2022. Because the project site is now vacant
and undeveloped, except for the Baker House, the decision was made to update technical
studies for air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and
transportation based on the current site conditions. Accordingly, the DEIR was then
recirculated and distributed for a new 45-day public review period on June 20th, 2024, with
the comment period concluding on August 5th, 2024, after which the City prepared a Final EIR
(FEIR); and
b. The FEIR has been completed, and has analyzed the environmental impacts
of the construction and operation of the proposed project; and
c. The FEIR contains the information required by CEQA Guidelines Section
15132, including without limitation, the Draft EIR and all revisions and additions thereto,
comments on the Draft EIR received from various agencies, organizations, companies,
individuals or other interested parties, and the City’s responses to the comments received on
the Draft EIR, and findings as required by CEQA statue; and
d. The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all
recommended mitigation measures, certain impacts would result in significant and
unavoidable impacts. These include impacts to Land Use Planning (Appendix G, Section XI),
and Noise (Appendix G, Section XIII). Specifically, the project proposes new large industrial
development to be located approximately 50 feet from the nearest existing residential
development, which conflicts with General Plan Land Use policy LC-7.4, which discourages
large industrial projects to be located within 1,000 feet of existing and planned residential
development. Further, regarding impacts to noise, as the developer anticipates the proposed
buildings to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, anticipated noise generated from the use
would be 60.2 decibels (dBA) as measured at nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), as
measured from the residences located along the north side of 9th Street. Further, noise
thresholds will also be exceeded in Ontario, specifically as measured from the residences
located on the southside of 8th Street. Whereas the City of Ontario establishes nighttime
thresholds of 49 dBA (10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), which is the current measured ambient noise
level, operations from the project will result in approximately 58 dBA at this location along the
southside of 8th Street. As such, the operational characteristics of the proposed project will
exceed the noise thresholds for both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario;
and
e. As part of project approval, the City Council has considered a CEQA Findings
Page 431
and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which acknowledges these unavoidable
impacts, but which also acknowledges project benefits. The CEQA Findings and Statement
of Overriding Considerations is included with this Resolution as “Exhibit A” and is hereby
adopted upon approval of the project
8. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6 and 7 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every
condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
9. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF DECEMBER 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the 17TH day of December 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:
Page 432
Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The project shall comply with all mitigations measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report
SCH No. 2019110456 and the corresponding Mitigation monitoring and Reporting Program.
1.
Prior to Final Inspection, decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site ,
behind the public right -of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line
to the building setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway.
2.
Pursuant to direction provided by the Design Review Committee on December 17, 2024 relative to
truck access to all three buildings, and prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant shall revise plans
to reflect modifications to the site plan to accommodate additional on-site truck queuing.
3.
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building
colors.
4.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections
shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent
nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or
roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included
in building plans.
5.
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval
provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of
Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of
grading/construction plans for plan check, and/or commencement of the approved activity.
6.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 433
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials ,
officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any
and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether
legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions
procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures )
(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its
officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including
actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are
brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or
local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This
indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the
Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions ,
related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any
judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit ,
action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve ,
which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and
that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by
the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and
City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its
expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of
the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.
7.
Approval of Tentative Tract No. 20173 is granted subject to the approval of Design Review
DRC2019-00742, Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009, Certificate of Appropriateness
DRC2019-00854, and Development Agreement DRC2022-00266.
8.
Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of
Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for
information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be
wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
9.
The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee in the amount of $4,123.50. All checks are to be
made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission
Secretary prior to public hearing.
10.
www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 434
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within
2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted, unless otherwise permitted
within the approved Development Agreement
11.
Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the
business including changes to the operating days /hours; change in the location on -site or within the
building of the use /activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new
building construction; and/or other modifications /intensification beyond what is specifically approved by
this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
submittal of documents for plan check /occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or
issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or
intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for
review by the City.
12.
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .
Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the
Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined
in 17.124.020.D. unless otherwise stated within the approved Development Agreement .
If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building
permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.
If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an
application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to
the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate
the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.
If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be
subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the
proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.
No final approval, such as a final inspection or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any
development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is
subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
13.
This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3
years from the date of the approval unless otherwise stated within the approved Development
Agreement.
14.
Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development
Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 435
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the
case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for
Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or
prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction
Services.
16.
The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the
required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Services Department.
17.
Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right -of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
18.
Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval
prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics
of the selected tree species.
19.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per
30 linear feet of building.
20.
All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment (I.E. colors and materials consistent with the design
theme of the primary structure). If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated
with the Engineering Services Department.
21.
Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient
landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.
22.
Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For
residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of
the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way.
23.
All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and
exits shall be striped per City standards.
24.
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings /units/buildings with open spaces /plazas/ recreational
uses.
25.
A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and
approval prior to issuance of Building Permits.
26.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other
applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
27.
www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 436
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including
proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the
Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.
28.
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site
Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading
on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code
regulations.
29.
All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed
shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The
specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning
Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls
shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.
30.
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall
be routed through the interior of the building walls.
31.
All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located
out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family
residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
32.
The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in
accordance with Certificate of Appropriateness DRC 2019-00854. Any further modifications to the site
including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and /or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the
buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or
structures, or changes to the site of the subject Historical Landmark, shall require a modification to the
Certificate of Appropriateness subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval .
33.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner ,
homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance
shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
34.
A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800 ) prior to the issuance of Building Permits .
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties .
35.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has
commenced, whichever comes first.
36.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of
Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
37.
www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 437
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all
costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.
1.
The development shall comply with all the undergrounding requirements of City's Ordinance No. 1045.2.
Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that
would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure.
The developer shall extend all required infrastructure for high -speed broadband ("Required
Infrastructure ") onto the Project site. The developer shall extend the required infrastructure to include
1-4” underground Fiber Optic conduit with 3-inner ducts, as well as a 432 strand fiber optic cable along
9th Street using the most direct route from the existing point -of-connection at/near the intersection of 9th
Street and Flower Road to an existing Fiber Optic point -of-connection west of the Deer Creek Channel
at/near the existing industrial development on the north side of 9th Street and then into the project site to
serve the project as described below. The size, placement and location of the conduit and /or vaults shall
be designed to accommodate future expansion by either the City or another developer.
An additional 1-4" fiber optic conduit and a yet to be determined strand fiber optic cable will be required
inside the project boundaries to serve the buildings on site (not within the Baker House parcel) to be
placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per
Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City 's 4" fiber optic conduit along 9th Street.
The size, placement and location of the conduit and /or vaults shall run into each of the building 's
telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the
Engineering Services Department 's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or
final map approval, whichever comes first.
The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement
and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department 's review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first.
3.
Developer shall construct all traffic improvements and dedicate the necessary right -of-way consistent
with the demands outlined in the Project's TIA and as determined necessary by the City Engineer .
4.
Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance5.
The project Final Map shall meet the Subdivision Map Act, City Development Codes, and Conditions of
Approval requirements. The Final Map shall be approved and recorded with the San Bernardino
County Recorders Office prior to issuance of Building Permits .
6.
www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 438
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Vineyard Ave. & Foothill Blvd. Intersection: Optimize the AM peak hour signal timing to improve
intersection operations.
Vineyard Ave. & Arrow Rte. Intersection: Optimize the AM peak hour signal timing to improve
intersection operations.
Baker Ave. & 8th St. Intersection:
1. The applicant shall design and construct the traffic signal at the intersection
2. Restripe the southbound approach to have a dedicated left -turn pocket and a shared through -right
lane
3. Restripe the eastbound approach to have a dedicated left -turn lane and a shared through -right turn
lane
7.
Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -3 shall be constructed following City 's drainage master plan and
approved drainage study. A permanent storm drain easement shall be granted to the City for the public
master storm drain line prior acceptance of the improvements.
8.
Project shall abide to all the terms under the approved development agreement.9.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary
to construct the required public improvements, and if he /she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at
least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City
decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide
for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off -site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall
be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: The master plan storm drain
connection between the south east corner of the project and the existing storm channel to the east.
10.
Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted
on the final map.
11.
Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer (measured from street centerline):
33 total feet on 9th Street
33 total feet on Baker Street
44 total feet on Vineyard Avenue
12.
www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 439
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC &Rs or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no
map is involved.
13.
Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be
recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map.
14.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be
installed as required by the City Engineer.
15.
It shall be the developer 's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone "A" designation removed from
the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and /or flood protection facilities sufficient to
obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans,
and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained
from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter
of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance ,
whichever occurs first.
16.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
17.
Prior to the issuance of a ROW permit or a grading permit for work with the San Bernardino County
Flood Control right-of-way, a permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required
for work within its right -of-way. Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall
finalize all construction and obtain a sign -off from all related work from the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District.
18.
Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from
the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
19.
** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit
Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion
Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion
Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and
demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant
must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of
diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and / or demolition project.
Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.
Instructions and forms are available at the City 's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering /
Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.
20.
www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 440
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way as required:
San Bernardino County Flood Control District
Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad
City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD)
21.
A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District
(LMD) 3B shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or
issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
This parcel is required to be annexed into CFD 2022-01 & CFD 2022-02 district (Street Lighting
Services) to finance the maintenance and services of streetlights, traffic lights, and appurtenant
facilities. This condition needs to be completed before the Final Map approval or issuance of Building
Permits whichever occurs first. Any annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. To start the
annexation process, please contact Kelly Guerra at 909-774-2582
22.
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 441
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Construct the following perimeter frontage street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name: Vineyard Avenue
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
Street Name: Baker Street
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
Street Name: 9th Street
Curb & Gutter
A.C. Pvmt
Side-walk
Drive Appr.
Street Lights
Street Trees
The applicant shall design and construct all necessary improvements at the intersection of 9th Street
and Vineyard Avenue to accommodate truck traffic associated with the project. Improvements may
include, but are not limited to, street widening, traffic signal modifications, updated signage, and
restriping. A truck turning analysis may be required to determine the extent of improvements needed .
The final scope of work shall be determined during the project’s design phase, subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer.
Notes: 1. Access to the project site from Baker Avenue for all truck -tractors, semitrailers, and trailers,
which exceed any of the size limitations set forth in Vehicle Code 35400 and 35401 shall be prohibited .
2. Pavement reconstruction or overlays will be determined during plan check.
23.
Project shall abide to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010.24.
www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 442
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement
plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street
trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Title Sheet (typically Sheet 1).” Where public
landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape
improvement plans.
Street Name:
Botanical Name:
Common Name:
Min. Grow Space:
Spacing:
Size:
Qty.: To be determined during design
Construction Notes for Street Trees :
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City
inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as
determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.
Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
25.
Intersection line of sight designs shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer for
conformance with adopted policy. Lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including
driveways.
26.
All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and /or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior
street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
27.
Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance
with the City's street tree program.
28.
The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.29.
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric
power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards as required .
Easements shall be provided as required.
30.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and
other interested agencies involved. Approval of the parcel map will be subject to any requirements that
may be received from them.
31.
www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 443
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga
Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental
Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required
prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have
been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or
prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
32.
Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future
signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits ,
whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit
shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Notes:
1) Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be
provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the
construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
2) Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to
City Standards, except for single-family residential lots.
33.
All existing easements lying within future rights -of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final
map.
34.
Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.35.
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
1.
Plans for the alarm and /or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
2.
Plans for the egress lighting are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit .
Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
3.
www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 444
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate
permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
4.
Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted
separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for
routing to the Fire District.
5.
Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately
and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the
submittal of the Water District mylars. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to
the Fire District.
6.
Plans for the racks used for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and
issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire
District.
7.
Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
8.
Plans for the temporary access and /or hydrants are required to be submitted separately and issued a
separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District.
9.
Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are
required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
10.
Emergency responder radio coverage is required for the building (s) included in this project. San
Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD) conducts radio signal strength assessments
for the entire county. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed for
this project. Where emergency responder radio coverage is determined to meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code, an emergency responder radio system and /or associated equipment will not be
required. Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov to
schedule an assessment and/or obtain any available information about the project site.
Where the existing emergency responder radio coverage is found to be below acceptable standards ,
an emergency responder radio system and associated equipment will be required to be provided in
compliance and accordance with the California Fire Code.
11.
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with
the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.
12.
Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).
CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com.
13.
Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District
has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial
buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be
provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.
14.
www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 445
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
15.
Gates installed across a commercial /industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required
to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
16.
Notwithstanding the availability of a public utility to provide natural gas for a stationary emergency power
generator, natural gas fueled stationary emergency power generators supplied from the public utility
shall be provided with an alternate source of fuel or the ability to accept an alternate source of fuel due
to historical and foreseeable extended interruptions of the natural gas supply caused by seismic
activity.
In the event that a emergency generator is required, a fuel-fired generator will be provided.
17.
Generator installations are required to comply with the currently adopted editions of National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) Standards 30, 37, 110. If battery equipment is included in the generator
project, it is required to comply with NFPA 111. The level of compliance must be in accordance with the
generator’s function as an emergency power system or a standby power system as defined by the
California Fire Code. Plan submittals are required to include all specifications of the equipment to be
installed along with the electrical plans and load calculations. All equipment must be listed .Testing and
acceptance criteria are strictly observed. Installation and acceptance test reports in accordance with
applicable NFPA standards are required to be provided to the Fire District. Working clearances and
clearances to the building based on the fuel capacity must be observed. AQMD permits are required
with the plan check submittals. Dual fuel generators may be required by AQMD for testing purposes .
The generator operation must be monitored remotely by a qualified alarm supervising station. A
separate submittal is required for the alarm connection.
18.
Identification of exterior perimeter fire access doors is required to be in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
19.
High-piled combustible storage is required to be in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Fire Code and
Fire District Standard 32-1. Please read and understand this Standard in its entirety to avoid delays in
scheduling inspections and obtaining approvals. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
20.
A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be
required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system
controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the
Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the
building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.
21.
A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide
access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire
District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.
22.
A Knox or Fire District padlock is required to be incorporated into the security system for a manually
operated gate that are installed across or provides access to a fire access road (fire lane).
23.
www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 446
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot
obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the
shrubs and trees.
24.
Release of construction permits issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San
Bernardino will be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. The Standard has been uploaded to
the Documents section.
25.
A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has
been uploaded to the Documents section.
26.
All of the Fire District Standards applicable are required to be reproduced on the plans. The project is
required to meet all of the applicable codes, regulations, and standards in effect and adopted at the
time of plan check submittal. Fire District Standards associated with construction and plan submittals
can be found on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's website and accessed via
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4k4qdxhs4tp13c7/AAAdscMKMdW9WIQe725 xWyU-a?dl=0
27.
The fire access / fire lane and fire water mains cross existing property lines, are located on property not
under the control of the applicant or are located on a property that is being or could be subdivided. To
ensure continued Fire District use of and access to, and maintenance as needed, of the fire access /
fire lane and fire water mains, a reciprocal agreement between property owners and the Fire District is
required. The agreement is required to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder. A site
plan showing the location of the fire access / fire lane and fire water mains is required to be included
with the agreement. The agreement is required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire District prior to
recording. Proof of recordation is required to be submitted to the Fire District. A template of this
agreement has been included in Fire District Standard 5-10, which has been uploaded to the
Documents section.
28.
Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been
uploaded to the Documents section.
29.
Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in
accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
30.
Fire apparatus access roads and emergency vehicle access is required to be identified with signs
and/or other approved makings in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. A copy of the Standard
has been uploaded to the Documents section.
31.
Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and
equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with
Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.
32.
Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire
sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and
equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District
Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.
33.
www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 447
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Combustible construction materials, including combustible roofing materials, are prohibited from being
onsite prior to a water supply system in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10 being provided in
accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the
Documents section of this project in the Online Permit Center.
34.
Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be
in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents
section.
35.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural
calculations, energy calculations and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance
with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and
standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access
for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations .
Connection to the public sewer is required for all 3 developed parcels.
1.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”.
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The
Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual
Grading and Drainage Plan.
2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall
implement design recommendations per said report.
3.
The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4.
A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and
for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by
a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
5.
www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 448
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust
control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be
located outside of the public right of way.
6.
If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department
for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent
property owner(s) to construct wall (s) on property line(s). If adjacent property owner declines for
permission, provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property
line.
8.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility
path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance
with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail
including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building
Code.
9.
The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible ,
and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.
10.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a
minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All
slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code .
11.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking
stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current
adopted California Building Code.
12.
The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond
shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee.
13.
The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
14.
This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
15.
www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 449
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading
meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative , the grading contractor and
the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a
pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit
may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department
at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing
grading operations:
i)The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii)Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii)At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Engineering Services Department Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad
Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils
Engineer of Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16.
All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Vineyard Avenue and Baker Street) must drain under
the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown
on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans.
17.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan )
set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the
building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC
R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted
California Building Code/Residential Code.
18.
Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit
to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of
existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed
structures and drainage of the site.
19.
A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared
and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on -site storm water
drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile
gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet
signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall
provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water
flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
20.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
21.
Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California
Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.
22.
www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 450
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)
storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
23.
Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance
of all storm water quality structural /treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as
provided for in the project’s Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC &R’s or
deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC &R’s
and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan .
24.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non -residential projects the applicant shall show on the
electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards
Code, section 5.106.5.3.
25.
Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office .
26.
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
27.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading
plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current
adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2.
28.
The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for
each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services
Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and /or approval of the project -specific Water
Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the
permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water
Quality Management Plan.
29.
The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person /company on a biennial basis for
the Class V Injection Wells /underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP”s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the
responsibility of the land owner.
30.
www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 451
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental
Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water
Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground
infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
31.
A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City
Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm Water Quality
Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit.
32.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a
minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters
shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility
for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.
33.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall
include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located
in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for
Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety
Factors”.
34.
Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a
soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water
quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current
adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.
35.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water
Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services
Department.
36.
www.CityofRC.us Page 20 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 452
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No .
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements ).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to
primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer
strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect
groundwater:
a.Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b.Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater
quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior
to infiltration.
c.Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics ), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes’).
d.Unless adequate pre -treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment
BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity {77}, areas subject to high
vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic ); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other
high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e.Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular {78} repair or
maintenance activities {79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used
car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does
any vehicular repair work.
f.Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water
supply wells.
h.The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high
groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial
uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained.
i.Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
37.
www.CityofRC.us Page 21 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 453
Project #: DRC2019-00742 DRC2019-00756, DRC2019-00854, DRC2022-00266, SUBTPM20173
Project Name: EDR - Pannatoni 9th & Vineyard
Location: 8830 VINEYARD AVE - 020727193-0000
Project Type: Design Review Certificate of Appropriateness , Development Agreement, Notice of Filing
Permit, Tentative Parcel Map
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10
(Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:
Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water
flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1.Swales.
2.Water collection and disposal systems .
3.French drains.
4.Water retention gardens .
5.Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater
recharge.
Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path.
38.
www.CityofRC.us Page 22 of 22Printed: 12/10/2025
Page 454
ORDINANCE NO. 1052
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2022-00266 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE NEW WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 969,096 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 45.96-ACRE PROJECT SITE BOUND BY 9TH STREET TO THE NORTH, BAKER AVENUE TO THE WEST, VINEYARD AVENUE TO THE EAST, AND ADJACENT TO 8TH STREET TO THE SOUTH; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, AND -97
A.Recitals.
1.WHEREAS, CP Logistics Vineyard LLC (the “Applicant”), filed an application for
and negotiated the terms of Development Agreement DRC2022-00266, as described in the title
of this Ordinance and attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject
development agreement is referred to as the “application" or the “Development Agreement”; and
2.WHEREAS, On November 12, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded
said hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to
recommend that the City Council approve Development Agreement DRC2022-00226; and
3.WHEREAS, On December 17, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date, and thereafter introduced for first reading this
Ordinance; and
4.WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have
occurred.
B.Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2025, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the approximately 45.96-acre project site which
comprises nine parcels, APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97. The project
site is bounded by 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west, Vineyard Avenue to the east,
and is adjacent to 8th Street to the south. The project site is currently vacant, with the exception
of an existing cell tower, located approximately 300 linear feet west of Vineyard Avenue along the
project’s southern property line, which would remain and not be removed. The project site also
contains a vacant historic structure on the west side of the site at 8803 Baker Avenue (the “Baker
House”); and
ATTACHMENT 6
Page 455
b.Concurrent with this application, the Applicant has also applied for a
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173) to consolidate the existing nine parcels into four new
parcels, Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009) and
Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) to permit the use and construction of the
proposed project; and
c.Development of the project is governed by the City’s General Plan,
Development Code, all entitlements associated with the project, and the subject Development
Agreement between the City and Applicant; and
d.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the
project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial Employment (NI)
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
Industrial,
Residential, Open
Space
Neighborhood Center, Neo-
Industrial Employment (NI),
Suburban Neighborhood Low,
Industrial Employment (IE),
General Open Space and
Facilities (OS)
Industrial Employment
(IE), Neo-Industrial
(NI), Parks (P),
Neighborhood General
3-Limited (NG3-L),
Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC),
Medium Residential (M)
South
BNSF Railway,
Industrial,
Residential,
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neo-Industrial Employment (NI);
Low Density Residential (within
Ontario), Neighborhood
Commercial (within Ontario)
Neo-Industrial (NI);
Neighborhood
Commercial (CN)
(within Ontario), Low
Density Residential
(LDR5) (within Ontario)
West Residential Traditional Neighborhood District Low Medium
Residential (LM)
East Industrial and
Cucamonga Creek
Open Space (OS) and Neo-
Industrial Employment (NI)
Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC), Neo-
Industrial (NI)
e.The project is for the development of three new industrial warehouse
buildings on four new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 611,574 square feet
including potential office space not to exceed 4,000 square feet, Building 2 will total
approximately 107,541 square feet including potential office space on the first and second
Page 456
floor, both not to exceed 2,000 square feet, and Building 3 will total approximately 262,981
square feet including potential office space on the first floor not to exceed 2,500 square feet,
and the second floor not to exceed 2,000 square feet. The project provides 362 parking stalls
and 168 trailer parking stalls; and
f.The project also includes the retention, rehabilitation and reuse of the
Baker House, in compliance with the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties for use by the City as a community center. Pursuant to the Certificate of
Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854), the City will review the rehabilitation and future use in
conformance with the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance.
g.As part of the Project, and in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City has prepared Environmental Impact Report SCH No.
2019110456 (EIR), which analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project and
related approvals; and
h.Pursuant to Section 17.22.060 of the Development Code, Development
Agreements have been determined to be beneficial to the public in that:
i.Development Agreements increase the certainty in the approval of
development projects, thereby preventing the waste of resources, reducing the
cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging investment in and
commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum efficient
utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
ii.Development Agreements provide assurance to the applicant for a
development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may
proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and
regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, thereby strengthening the
public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive
planning, and reducing the economic costs of development.
iii.Development Agreements enable the City to plan for and finance public
facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, sewerage, transportation,
drinking water, school, and utility facilities, thereby removing a serious
impediment to the development of new housing.
i.The proposed Development Agreement Amendment is being made and
entered into for the project to ensure that the above three goals are fulfilled; and
j.The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code
including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage.
SECTION 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Sections
1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Page 457
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The project site
comprises nine parcels: APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97. The General
Plan designation for each of the nine parcels is Neo-Industrial Employment (NI) District, which
permits the proposed industrial use.
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Storage warehouses are permitted
within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 was submitted for the operation of a wholesale, storage
and distribution warehouse.
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code. Storage Warehouses are permitted within the Neo-Industrial
Employment (NI) District upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project complies
with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking
and design.
d. The proposed use is in conformance with the City’s Historic Preservation
Ordinance. Pursuant to the Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854), the City will review
the rehabilitation and future use of the Baker House to require conformance with the City’s Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
e. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental
impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 4. The Development Agreement, in addition to the Tentative Parcel Map,
Design Review, Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Appropriateness (collectively, the
“Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the
City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an
environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project.
By separate Resolution No. 2025-101, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA
findings and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2025-101 is incorporated herein by
reference, and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other
materials that constitute the record on which this determination was made are located in the
Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation
measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project.
SECTION 5. On the basis of the foregoing and the totality of the administrative record
before it, the City Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2022-00266 as shown
in Exhibit 1.
Page 458
SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause
or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional,
invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The
City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of December
2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 459
Record at the Request of and when Recorded
Mail to:
Kim Sevy
City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
APNs: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -
94, -96, and -97
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DRC2022-00266
REGARDING THE 9TH AND VINEYARD WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement” or this “Development Agreement”) is
made and entered into as of the “Effective Date” set forth herein, by and between CP LOGISTICS
VINEYARD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (“City”).
RECITALS
Section 1. On December 17, 2025 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(“Council”) adopted the following resolutions:
A. Resolution 2025-101, approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009
(inclusive of following uses to be vested in perpetuity and approved separately via either a
Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) or Minor Use Permit (“MUP”): Wholesale and
Distribution, Medium (CUP); Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large (MUP); E-Commerce
Distribution (CUP); Storage Warehouse (CUP); Manufacturing, Light – Large (MUP)); and
and
B.Resolution 2025-101, approving Design Review DRC2019-00742; and
C.Resolution 2025-101, approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173;
D.Resolution 2025-101, approving Certificate of Appropriateness
DRC2019-00854; and
E. Resolution 2025-101 certifying, after making appropriate finding,
Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) identified as SCH No. 2019110456.
Section 2. Collectively, the Resolutions identified in Section 1 of the recitals (collectively,
“Project Entitlements”) amended the City’s land use regulations to permit the redevelopment of
the site with three industrial buildings with warehouse distribution uses and ancillary office space,
including the 611,574 square-foot (“sf”) in Building 1, 107,541 sf in Building 2, and 262,981 sf in
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Exhibit 1
Page 460
-2-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Building 3, along with the construction of internal drive aisles, parking, on-site landscaping,
lighting, and utility connections.
Section 3. California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. authorizes cities to enter into
binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property
for the development of such property. Developer is owner of the Site, as defined below and
generally described as a 45.96-acre site bound by 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west,
Vineyard Avenue to the east, and adjacent to 8th Street to the south, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California comprising tax Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs)
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97, and has a legal interest in the real property
subject to this Agreement.
Section 4. City and Developer mutually desire to enter into this Development Agreement to
implement the Project.
Section 5. On December 17, 2025, City adopted its Ordinance No. 1052 (the
“Approving Ordinance”), thereby approving this Development Agreement between the City
and Developer, which is effective as of ________________. All requirements of the
California Environment Quality Act have been met with respect to the Project, Project
Entitlements, and this Agreement, and this Agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following
terms shall have the following meaning:
“Approving Ordinance” means Ordinance 1052, which approved this Agreement.
“Baker House” means the abandoned home located on west side of the Site and having an address
of 8803 Baker Avenue.
“Building 1” means the 611,574 sf building identified as “Building 1” in the Development Plan.
“Building 2” means the 107,541 sf building identified as “Building 2” in the Development Plan.
“Building 3” means the 262,981 sf building identified as “Building 3” in the Development Plan.
“City” means the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
“Developer” means CP Logistics Vineyard LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
“Development Plan” means those plans, specifications, and images attached hereto, collectively
marked as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference.
“Effective Date” means the date that this Agreement is executed by the City and Developer as set
forth on the signature page hereto, and the Approving Ordinance becomes effective.
Page 461
-3-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
“Material Handling Equipment” means all equipment intended for use in connection with the
Project’s operation for the purpose of loading or unloading goods and materials, including all
forklifts.
“Project” means the proposed development of the Site, consistent with the terms and conditions of
the Project Entitlements.
“Project Entitlements” mean the Resolutions described in recital Sections 1 through 2.
“RC Fiber” means the high speed broadband internet service and corresponding fiber-optic
infrastructure City provides and operates.
“Sidewalks” means the sidewalks identified by the City in the area bounded by Arrow Route,
Grove Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
“Site” means the real property that is the subject of the Project Entitlements and as legally
described, depicted and identified in Exhibit “A-1” and Exhibit “A-2”.
“Traffic Calming” means traffic calming enhancements/improvements the area bounded by Arrow
Route, Grove Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
“Trees” means the trees identified by the City within the area bounded by Arrow Route, Grove
Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
Section 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of this Agreement and shall be enforceable as any
other provision of this Agreement.
Section 3. Interest of Developer. Developer warrants and represents that, as of the Effective
Date, it will have legal title to or an equitable interest in the Site; that it has full legal right to enter
into this Agreement; and that the persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer have
been duly authorized to do so.
Section 4. Binding Effect of Agreement. Developer hereby subjects the Project and the Site
to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the
Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as
set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding
upon Developer’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Project. Each and every contract,
deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Project or any portion
thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the
covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such
covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument.
The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of
such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of
the Site by Developer and the future occupants of the Project, the intended beneficiaries of such
covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this
Agreement is adopted.
Page 462
-4-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 5. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between
City and Developer is such that City and Developer are each an independent party and neither is
the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever and neither shall be considered to be
the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever.
Section 6. Term of Agreement.
A.The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall
continue for eight (8) consecutive calendar years thereafter, unless the Term is otherwise
terminated, modified, or extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. So long
as there are no material changes to the Project, the Developer is not then in breach beyond the
notice and cure periods set forth in this Agreement, and the Developer has made all payments to
the City as required pursuant to this Agreement, Developer has an option to extend the Term one
time for an additional two (2) years upon mutual consent of the Parties. To exercise this option,
Developer must, no less than ninety (90) days’ prior to the expiration of the Term, both: (i) provide
City with written notice of the intent to exercise the option and (ii) pay to City one million dollars
($1,000,000.00). Upon receipt of such notice and payment, City will provide written confirmation
that the Developer’s option to extend the Term has been exercised and accepted. The Term shall
not be extended until City provides written confirmation to Developer.
B.Notwithstanding Subsection A above, this Agreement and the Project Entitlements
shall terminate unless Developer obtains a building permit for the construction of the Project or
the Baker House Improvements defined below within three (3) calendar years after the Effective
Date and then construction commences on the Project or the Baker House Improvements within
five (5) calendar years after the Effective Date. If Developer fails to perform by either (i) not
obtaining a building permit for construction, or (ii) not commencing construction in accordance
with the preceding sentence, then the Agreement and the Project Entitlements shall be of no further
force or effect and City shall have no further obligations under this Agreement or to return any
fees collected by City pursuant to this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, if Developer
(i)obtains a building permit for construction of the Baker House Improvements within three (3)
calendar years after the Effective Date, and (ii) commences construction on the Baker House
Improvements within five (5) calendar years after the Effective Date, then this Section 6(B) shall
no longer be in effect or otherwise enforceable.
Section 7. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee
Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties to provide
for the timing of development resulting in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of
development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the parties’ intent to cure that deficiency
by acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have the right (without obligation), subject
to the provisions of this Agreement, to complete the Project in such order and at such rate and at
such times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment.
Section 8. Assignment. In the event of a proposed transfer of interest in the Site or any portion
thereof or in this Agreement by Developer to a transferee, Developer agrees to comply with the
following conditions:
Page 463
-5-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
(i)At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall
provide the City with written notice thereof along with written evidence and
documentation, of a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the City,
demonstrating the experience, capability, competence, and financial ability
of the proposed assignee to carry out and complete the Development Plan
and comply with the terms of this Agreement.
(ii)At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall also
provide evidence that the transferee will assume in writing through an
assignment and assumption agreement all remaining obligations of
Developer under this Agreement. The assignment and assumption
agreement shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney.
(iii)The City Manager shall have consented to the assignment of this
Agreement, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or
conditioned.
Any assignment of this Agreement not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions
shall constitute an event of default by the Developer pursuant to Section 18. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon any
transferee whether or not such an assignment and assumption agreement is signed by the assignee
upon acquiring the Property.
Section 9. General Standards and Restrictions Pertaining to Development of the Site.
The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this Development
Agreement:
A.Developer shall have the right to develop the Project on the Site in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this Agreement and City shall have the right to control development
of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
B.The type, density, intensity, configuration of uses allowed, size, and location of
buildings and other improvements and provisions for the reservation or dedication of land for
public purposes, location of public improvements, together with other terms and conditions of
development applicable to the Site, shall be as set forth in this Development Agreement, including
the Development Plan.
C.Public improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, irrigation, sidewalk,
and traffic improvements, as set forth in the Development Plan, if any, shall be installed by the
Developer.
Section 10. Effect of City Regulations on Development of Project. Except as expressly
provided in this Agreement, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained
in City’s ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance, in effect as of June 23, 2021, the date the City
considered the Development Plan to be deemed complete, shall apply to the construction and
development of the Project. The foregoing sentence does not apply to Conditional Use Permit
DRC2022-0009, which covers the uses of the Project contemplated by this Agreement.
Page 464
-6-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A.The provisions of this Section 10 shall not preclude the application to the
development of the Site those changes in City ordinances, regulations, plans, or specifications
which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations as
provided in California Government Code Section 65869.5 or any successor provision or
provisions. In the event such changes in the law prevent or preclude compliance with one or more
of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or
suspended or performance thereof delayed, as may be necessary to comply with such changes in
the law.
B.The category of Development Impact Fees (“DIF”) applicable to the Project and
attached as Exhibit “D” shall be those in effect as of the Agreement’s Effective Date (i.e. new DIF
categories which may be adopted by the City after the Agreement’s Effective Date shall not apply
to the Project); however the existing DIF and other development fees associated with the
construction and development of the Project, including but not limited to land use approvals,
development fees, building permits, etc., shall be pursuant to the rates as annually adjusted and in
effect at the time application is made for such approvals or permits. Developer shall pay all such
fees in accordance with the ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of payment, except that
Developer shall pay the Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (“AH DIF”) in accordance
with the following schedule:
i.Thirty percent (30%) of the total AH DIF for the Project prior to or upon
issuance of the first building permit for the Baker House;
ii.Thirty percent (30%) of the total AH DIF for the Project prior to or upon
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Baker House in accordance with Section 11(B)
below; and
iii.Forty percent (40%) prior to or upon issuance of the first building permit
for Building 1, Building 2, or Building 3 of the Project.
C.City may only apply new ordinances, rules, regulations, plans, and specifications
to the development of the Site after the Effective Date if such new rules and regulations are not
inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, and fall under one of the following categories:
i.Processing fees and charges imposed by the City to cover the estimated
actual costs to City of processing applications for development approvals, provided that such fees
and charges are uniformly imposed by the City at similar stages of project development on all
similar applications;
ii.General or special taxes, including, but not limited to, property taxes, sales
taxes, parcel taxes, transient occupancy taxes, business taxes, which may be applied to the Property
or to businesses occupying the Property, provided that the tax is of general applicability City-wide
and does not burden the Property disproportionately to other similar properties within the City;
iii.Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications,
notices, documentation of findings, records, manner in which hearings are conducted, reports,
recommendations, initiation of appeals, and any other matters of procedure; provided such
Page 465
-7-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
regulations are uniformly imposed by the City on all matters and do not result in any unreasonable
decision-making delays; or
iv.Ordinances, rules, regulations, plans, or specifications the Developer
consents to in writing.
D.Nothing herein shall prevent the application of health and safety regulations (e.g.,
fire, building, and seismic, plumbing, and electric codes) that become applicable to the City as a
whole.
Section 11. Developer’s Obligations. In consideration of the rights and benefits Developer is
guaranteed under this Agreement, the Developer agrees to provide each and every one of the
community benefits set forth in this Section 11.
A.Designation of City of Rancho Cucamonga as Point of Sale for Material Handling
Equipment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designated as the point of sale for the
Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. Developer shall include a
requirement in all tenant leases that tenants shall designate the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the
point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. City shall be a
third-party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases. City shall only be a third-party
beneficiary with respect to such terms related to Material Handling Equipment and shall not have
any ability to enforce other lease provisions. Provided that Developer complies with the preceding
sentence in this Section 11(A), Developer shall not be in default of this Agreement if a tenant fails
to cause City to be designated as a point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in that
tenant’s operations. Except as set forth in this Section 11(A), City shall not have the ability to
otherwise impact the viability or effectiveness of any tenant lease.
B.Baker House Improvements. Developer shall rehabilitate Baker House in
compliance with the United States Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties, and shall construct a visitor parking area, landscaping and hardscape improvements
(collectively, “Baker House Improvements”) in compliance with the approved Certificate of
Appropriateness DRC2019-00854 and the site plan and specifications attached as Exhibit “C” to
this Agreement (“Baker House Site Plan”). The Baker House Improvements shall be located on an
approximately 0.99-acre portion of the Project site as generally depicted in the Baker House Site
Plan (the “Baker House Site”). The Baker House Improvements shall be comprised of two
components: (i) the shell building improvements consisting of renovating the existing Baker
House structure (the “Baker House Shell Improvements”), and (ii) all improvements outside the
existing Baker House structure (the “Baker House Site Improvements”). The total budget for the
Baker House Shell Improvements and the Baker House Site Improvements is Two Million Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000) (the “Total Cost”).
i.Following the Effective Date, Developer is to promptly prepare and submit
to the City construction drawings in substantial conformance with the Baker House Site Plan (the
“Baker House Construction Drawings”) for plan check. City shall not unreasonably delay acting
on the Baker House Construction Drawings that are consistent with the Baker House Site Plan and
all applicable building codes. Upon City’s approval of the Baker House Construction Drawings
Page 466
-8-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
and confirmation that Baker House Construction Drawings are ready for permit issuance, such
drawings shall be deemed the “Approved Baker House Construction Drawings.”
ii.If prior to or during Developer’s construction of the Baker House
Improvements pursuant to subsection iii below, a natural disaster or other natural forces (e.g.
earthquake, fire, or flooding) renders construction of the Baker House Shell Improvements
infeasible, then Developer may exercise one of the following options, as applicable:
a.If the Baker House is entirely destroyed due to the natural disaster,
then Developer shall reconstruct a new, stick-frame structure or equivalent of less than or equal to
the size of the Baker House, and provide a monument commemorating the historical significance
of the Baker House in accordance with mitigation measure CUL-3 in the MMRP. In lieu of a new,
stick frame structure, the City can authorize in writing an alternative means of compliance.
b.In compliance with all related and applicable historic resource and
environmental laws, the City can deem the Baker House uninhabitable and require it to be
demolished if it is partially damaged or destroyed. Developer shall reconstruct a new, stick-frame
structure or equivalent of less than or equal to the size of the Baker House, and provide a monument
commemorating the historical significance of the Baker House in accordance with mitigation
measure CUL-3 in the MMRP. In lieu of a new, stick frame structure, the City can authorize in
writing an alternative means of compliance.
iii.In accordance with the EIR’s mitigation measures, Developer shall
complete the Baker House Improvements in accordance with the Approved Baker House
Construction Drawings and the terms specified in this Section 11(B). Developer shall select a
general contractor who shall obtain competitive bids from at least three (3) licensed and insured
subcontractors designated by Developer for each major trade component of the Baker House
Improvements with a scope of work over twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (“Major Trade
Component”). Developer shall provide the City with copies of all of such Major Trade Component
bids, and Developer shall adjust inconsistent or incorrect assumptions so that a like-kind
comparison can be made. Developer shall select in good faith the applicable subcontractor for
each Major Trade Component that provides the lowest qualified bid and who agrees to meet
Developer's construction schedule for each of the applicable components of the Baker House
Improvements.
a.If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Improvements
is less than or equal to the Total Cost, then Developer shall complete all Baker House
Improvements.
b.If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Shell
Improvements is, on its own, equal to or greater than the Total Cost, then Developer shall complete
the Baker House Shell Improvements and have no further obligation to complete the Baker House
Site Improvements. For the avoidance of doubt, Developer shall be required to pay for any cost
overage associated with the Baker House Shell Improvements, and, upon completion, City shall
deem Developer’s obligations with respect to the Baker House complete regardless of the Site’s
compliance with regulations from the Americans with Disabilities Act, parking requirements, or
Page 467
-9-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
other development standards. Developer shall not be liable for any defects related to the Baker
House Site Improvements.
c.If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Shell
Improvements is less than the Total Cost, but the combined price for all Baker House
Improvements exceeds the Total Cost, then City shall either (i) reduce the proposed scope for the
Baker House Site Improvements to result in a total bid price of less than or equal to the Total Cost
for the Baker House Improvements, or (ii) direct Developer to contribute the difference between
the Total Cost and the price for the Baker House Shell Improvements as a community benefit
payment to be paid to City prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project.
iv. During construction of the Baker House Improvements, the City-appointed
building inspectors shall not unreasonably delay construction or add new scopes of work beyond
what is consistent with the approved Baker House Construction Drawings, excepting life safety
items or items required by technical codes applicable to the construction of the Baker House
Improvements.
v.Upon completion of the actions set forth in Sections (11)(B)(i)-(iv),
Developer shall have no further obligations of any kind with respect to Baker House or the Baker
House Improvements, and the City shall be solely responsible for any future improvements,
programming, maintenance, or public use of the site. Developer shall also dedicate to the City by
grant deed fee title to the Baker House Site upon completion of the actions set forth in
Sections (11)(B)(i)-(iv).
vi.City shall not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for any building within the
Project until Developer has completed the Baker House Improvements in accordance with the
Approved Baker House Construction Drawings, obtained City acceptance thereof, and City has
issued a Certificate of Occupancy for the Baker House. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
completion of the rehabilitation of Baker House and completion of the Baker House Improvements
shall satisfy all but one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) of Developer’s public art
requirements under Chapter 17.124 of the City Municipal Code and the Public Art in Lieu Fee,
which may be satisfied either through the procurement of art or payment of an in-lieu fee.
C.Sidewalk, Trees, and Traffic Calming Improvements. Developer shall pay one
million seventy thousand dollars ($1,070,000.00) as an in-lieu fee to City and contribution toward
Sidewalks, Trees, and Traffic Calming improvements. The fee required pursuant to this
Section 11(C) shall be due upon the issuance of the first building permit for the Project.
Developer’s contribution to the City for Sidewalks, Trees, and Traffic Calming improvements will
satisfy any Condition of Approval, obligations/requirements in this Agreement,
obligations/requirements in this Agreement, and any future obligations pertaining to Sidewalks,
Trees, or Traffic Calming improvements.
D.Traffic Improvements. Developer shall construct and take other action related to
traffic improvements as required by the Project Entitlements. Developer shall submit off-site plans
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for each of the improvements identified below, as
applicable, consistent with the City’s standard off-site plan check review process required for
issuance of an offsite encroachment permit(s).
Page 468
-10-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
i.Traffic improvements as required by the Project Entitlements shall be
completed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, no later than by issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy of the Project’s first building. However in the event that Developer is unable to
complete the improvements by issuance of Certificate of Occupancy despite best efforts, due to
processing, required coordination with other projects, or other issues outside of Developer’s
control, then Developer shall issue a bond for the remaining work and shall be obligated to
complete the required improvements within one year of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy
for the Project’s first building.
ii.Developer shall construct the traffic improvements consistent with the
demands outlined in the Project Entitlements.
iii.If Developer is unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary rights-of-way or
easements to construct the required traffic or storm drain improvements as required by the Project
Entitlements, including such improvements at the northwest and southwest corners of 9th Street
and Vineyard Avenue, the City shall work in good faith to assist Developer’s effort to obtain the
necessary right-of-way and easements, including by exercising the City’s eminent domain power
where applicable pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5; however, the Developer shall
first attempt good faith negotiations to acquire the adjacent property needed for the right of way.
Further:
a.With regards to the right-of-way located at northwest corner of 8th
Street & Baker Avenue, which the City owns, the City shall sell the approximately 86 square feet
of required right-of-way by the Developer to permit Developer to construct the required
improvements at the northwest corner of 8th Street & Baker Avenue for $5,000; and
b.With regards to the right-of-way located at southeast corner of 8th
Street & Baker Avenue, which is located within the City of Ontario (“Ontario”), the City will
collaborate with Ontario to allow Developer to obtain the right-of-way.
iv.Following completion of construction and approval by City, Developer
shall dedicate these required traffic improvements and storm drain main to City. Developer’s
provision of traffic improvements and storm drain main pursuant to this Section 11(D) will satisfy
any Condition of Approval and any future obligations pertaining to these required traffic
improvements and storm drain main.
E.Other City Fees. Developer is responsible for other applicable development fees,
in accordance with Section 10(B), except that Developer shall be liable for one hundred fifty
thousand dollars ($150,000.00) towards the public arts requirement, which may be satisfied by
Developer as either through the procurement of art or payment of an in-lieu fee.
F.RC Fiber. Developer shall complete construction of the improvements intended to
serve RC Fiber to the Project, as described in the Project Entitlements’ conditions of approval.
Further, Developer shall utilize, and shall cause all tenants of the Project to utilize, RC Fiber high-
speed broadband (at a minimum of one (1) Gigabits (“Gbps”) per second service) for all fiber
service within the Project’s buildings for a period of not less than 10 years from the date each lease
commences. Developer shall cause all tenant leases to include such a requirement that they will
Page 469
-11-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
use RC Fiber high-speed broadband (at a minimum of one (1) Gigabits (“Gbps”) per second
service) for each tenant’s fiber service during such ten year period. Provided that Developer
complies with the preceding three (3) sentences in this Section 11 (F), Developer shall not be in
default of this Agreement if a tenant fails to obtain service from RC Fiber or does not carry out
any obligations with RC Fiber. Except as set forth in this Section 11 (F), City shall not have the
ability to otherwise impact the viability or effectiveness of any tenant lease. City shall be a third-
party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases.
Section 12. City’s Obligations. The City shall reasonably expedite review and processing of
all plans and issuance of all permits associated with the Project.
Section 13. Annual Review. During the Term of this Development Agreement, City shall
annually review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terms of this
Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual report with the City indicating
information regarding compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement by January 2 of
each year following the Effective Date of this Agreement. Annual reports shall include all
information necessary for the City to assess Developer’s compliance with the terms and provisions
of this Agreement. Developer shall have the right to cause the annual report to be filed by any
lessee then occupying the Site provided, however, that Developer shall remain primarily
responsible for such filing.
Section 14. Indemnification and Legal Challenge. To the maximum extent permitted by law,
Developer agrees to, and shall, defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers,
contractors serving as City officials, agents, and employees (“Indemnitees”) harmless from
liability for damage and/or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims
for property damage, and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or
alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer’s activities in connection with the construction
of the Project or operation of the permitted use, and which may arise from the direct or indirect
operations of Developer or those of Developer’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any
other persons acting on Developer’s behalf, which relate to the construction of the Project or
operation of the permitted use. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims for
damage, as described above, regardless of whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the
plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of any
provision of this Agreement, any of the entitlement documents pertaining to the Project including,
without limitation, the Conditional Use Permit, Design Review, Tentative Parcel Map, Certificate
of Appropriateness, EIR, or any other supporting document relating to the Project, the Developer
shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all
liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees
in relation to such action. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The parties
hereby agree to cooperate in defending such action. In the event of any litigation challenging the
effectiveness of this Agreement, or any portion hereof, this Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect while such litigation, including any appellate review, is pending, unless otherwise
ordered by the court. Absent issuance of an injunction, the Developer may elect to continue
development under this Agreement pending completion of the litigation but it shall do so at its sole
risk, and the City shall not be liable for any loss suffered as a result thereof.
Page 470
-12-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 15. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part,
only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California
Government Code § 65868, et seq., or successor provisions thereto.
Section 16. Minor Amendments to Development Plan. Upon the written application of
Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development Plan, including modifications to
the building design or footprint affecting setbacks, parking layout and design, and landscape design
may be approved by the Planning Director (“Director”). Substantial changes in the Development
Plan, as determined by the Director, shall be processed through the process required by law to
amend or modify the Development Plan. Upon the approval of such changes to the Development
Plan, Developer and City shall amend this Agreement to memorialize and acknowledge the revised
Development Plan.
Section 17. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by
Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) by registered or certified
mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the
reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is served on Developer, or
if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said
breach or default cannot be cured within said thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach
or default must be commenced within said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently
pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this
Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to
specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development
Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by
Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate.
Section 18. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the
happening of one or more of the following events or conditions:
A.If a material warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Developer
to City set forth herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein is false or proved to
have been false in any material respect when it was made;
B.If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant
to Section 13 hereinabove, upon the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied
in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and
opportunity to cure as described in Section 17 hereinabove; or
C.A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after
notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Section 17 hereinabove.
Section 19. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance
by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce this Agreement. Nonperformance by
Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein
contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party
or entity, other than City. Subject to the provisions of Section 20, all other remedies at law or in
equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to each party to pursue
Page 471
-13-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement by the other party (subject to
applicable notice and cure periods). No waiver by City or Developer of any breach or default
under this Development Agreement by the other party shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other
subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.
Section 20. City Not Liable For Damages. It is acknowledged by the parties that the City
would not have entered into this Agreement if it could be held liable in monetary damages under
or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Consequently, and except for the
payment of attorney’s fees in accordance with this Agreement, the Developer covenants on behalf
of itself and its successors in interest not to sue for or claim any monetary damages for any breach
of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any terms to the contrary herein, Developer may institute an
action for specific performance or other legal or equitable relief to cure, correct or remedy any
default, to enforce any covenants or agreements herein, or to obtain any other remedies consistent
with the purpose and terms of this Agreement.
Section 21. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to
be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary (“Lender”)
of said encumbrance or lien shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and
the existence of said encumbrance or lien to:
A.Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, or cure any default
of Developer under this Agreement within the time limits set forth in Section 17, and any such act
or thing done or performed by Lender or cure shall be as effective as if done by Developer;
B.Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising
foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the
security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter referred to as “a trust deed”);
C.Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at
any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant
to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and
D.Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale,
whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale
contained in a trust deed.
Should any Lender require or request an amendment of this Agreement in respect of the rights and
remedies granted to a Lender, City hereby agrees to execute and deliver such an amendment so
long as the proposed amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights, powers, and
remedies of the City in respect of a default by Developer hereunder.
Section 22. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this
Agreement by Developer to Lender (if known by City) simultaneously with such notice of default
City gives to Developer and afford Lender the opportunity after receipt of service of the notice to:
A.Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice, where
the default can be cured by the payment of money;
Page 472
-14-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
B.Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice where
the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured
within that time; or
C.Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where
something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and cannot be
performed within thirty (30) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default
are commenced within a thirty (30) day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by
City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender.
Section 23. Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a
Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement
by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project.
The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or
for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the
encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City
for the default or breach by Developer unless:
A.They are commenced within thirty (30) days after service on Developer (and on
Lender if Lender’s address is provided to the City) of the notice described hereinabove;
B.They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required
by law to completion; and
C.Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this
Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure
proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction, or payment.
Section 24. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be
provided by certified mail at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other
such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto.
To Developer: CP Logistics Vineyard LLC
2442 Dupont Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
Attention: Jacob R. LeBlanc
CDP Development, Inc.
2442 Dupont Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
Attention: Chase Metkovich
To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Planning Director
Page 473
-15-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 25. Attorneys’ Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this
Development Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees incurred during
the proceeding (including appeals) as may be fixed within the discretion of the court.
Section 26. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof
shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
Section 27. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action or litigation brought
for breach or to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be the Superior Court of the County
of San Bernardino, California.
Section 28. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, or enforceability of the remaining
provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
Section 29. Recordation. Developer shall record this Agreement in the Official Records of the
County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino at Developer’s sole expense within ten (10)
business days following the Effective Date. Upon the expiration of the terms of this Agreement
and the request of the Developer, the City will execute and deliver, in recordable form, an
instrument confirming that this Agreement is terminated and of no further force or effect.
Section 30. Force Majeure. In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered
or prevented from performance of any act required hereunder by reason of acts of God, strikes,
lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, riots, insurrection, terrorism, war or other
reason of similar nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing the work or doing the acts
required under the terms of this Agreement, then the performance of such act shall be excused for
the period of the delay caused by the foregoing. Financial inability shall not be deemed an excuse
for delay under this Section 30.
Section 31. Integrated Agreement. This Development Agreement consists of this Agreement
together with all Exhibits attached hereto, and all of the same are hereby incorporated by reference.
The provisions of this Agreement shall govern over any inconsistent or conflicting provisions set
forth in the Exhibits. No representation or promise, verbal or written, not expressly set forth herein
shall be binding or have any force or effect.
Section 32. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in every provision hereof in which time
is a factor.
Page 474
-16-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be
effective on the Effective Date set forth hereinabove.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a Municipal Corporation
Dated:
By:
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kim Sevy
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Nicholas R. Ghirelli
City Attorney
[Signatures continue on following page]
Page 475
-17-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
DEVELOPER:
CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: CP LOGISTICS PLATFORM, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Sole Member
By: PANATTONI CLP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Administrator
By: PANATTONI CLP OPERATOR, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Manager
By: _________________________________
William Bullen,
Vice President
CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: CP LOGISTICS PLATFORM, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Sole Member
By: PANATTONI CLP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Administrator
By: PANATTONI CLP OPERATOR, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Manager
By: _________________________________
Chase Metkovich,
Vice President
Page 476
-18-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of Colorado )
County of Denver )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of Colorado that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 477
-19-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of Orange )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 478
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of San Bernardino )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Page 479
1 10.9.19
9th & Vineyard
Legal Description
That certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
and is described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 31 LYING NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
RAILROAD COMPANY, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND
MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,
PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET THEREOF.
APN: 0207-271-25
PARCEL 2:
THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 25, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25 ON THE SOUTH LINE OF 9TH STREET,
60 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTH 305 FEET; THENCE EAST 108 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 125 FEET; THENCE EAST 123 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 FEET TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID 9TH STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF 9TH STREET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPT THE INTEREST IN THE NORTH 33 FEET OF SAID LOT 25 AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1958, IN BOOK 4638
PAGE 277, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN BOOK 809 PAGE 195, OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-27
PARCEL 3:
PARCEL NO. 3 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST,
SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4
OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WEST OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT
Page 480
2 10.9.19
CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED
NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, AS CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN
BOOK 809, PAGE 195, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1979, IN BOOK 9632, PAGE 663, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID LOT 25
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 45' 40" EAST 55.50 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 222.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 39' 31"
EAST 123.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 43.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45" EAST
371.43 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED
DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-94
PARCEL 4:
LOT 1 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 700 FOR LOT MERGER, AS EVIDENCED BY
DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0300680 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT LAND IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1998-
0190862 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH THAT LAND IN SAID CITY,
COUNTY AND STATE DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO.
1998-0190863 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED
RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1998-0190862, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF
NINTH STREET, 30.00 FEET IN HALF WIDTH, THENCE SOUTH 305 FEET; THENCE EAST 108
FEET; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET; THENCE EAST 123 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 FEET TO
SAID SOUTH LINE OF NINTH STREET; THENCE WEST 231 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
APN: 0207-271-97
PARCEL 5:
PARCEL 5A:
THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT
31, LYING NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY,
Page 481
3 10.9.19
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,
PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 0207-271-39
PARCEL 5B:
THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF LOT 31, SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,
RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 150 FEET, OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET.
APN: 0207-271-40
PARCEL 6:
PARCEL 11 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16141, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 215 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES
85 THROUGH 87 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 0207-271-89
PARCEL 7:
PARCEL NO. 2 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32 AND THE WEST LINE
OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 32; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 102.56 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST 433.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 8.30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST 213.03 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 32.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, BY DEED
RECORDED JANUARY 19, 1987, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 87-016234, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE
7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF
Page 482
4 10.9.19
MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WEST OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT CONVEYED TO
THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND
RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, AS CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN
BOOK 809, PAGE195, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1979, IN BOOK 9632, PAGE 663, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID LOT 25
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 45’ 40" EAST 55.50 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 222.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 39’ 31"
EAST 123.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 43.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST
371.43 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED
DECEMBER 02, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-96
PARCEL 8:
PARCEL NO. 1 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE ACHISON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY (100 FEET WIDE).
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32 AND THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST HALF OF LOT 32; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 102.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45"
EAST 433.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 8.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45" EAST
213.03 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 32.
APN: 0207-271-93
Page 483
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A
-
2
Page 484
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
-
B
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Page 528
Page 529
Page 530
Page 531
Page 532
Page 533
Page 534
Page 535
Page 536
Page 537
Page 538
Page 539
Page 540
Page 541
Page 542
Page 543
Page 544
Page 545
Ba
k
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
-
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
P
a
c
k
a
g
e
88
0
3
B
a
k
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
R
a
n
c
h
o
C
u
c
a
m
o
n
g
a
9
1
7
3
0
Da
t
e
:
1
2
/
0
5
/
2
0
2
4
2
SH
I
P
P
I
N
G
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
R
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
-
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
U
P
D
A
T
E
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
-
1
4
T
O
T
A
L
12
S
T
D
S
P
A
C
E
S
2
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
CO
V
E
R
E
D
O
U
T
D
O
O
R
EV
E
N
T
S
P
A
C
E
20
0
0
S
F
PL
A
Y
G
R
O
U
N
D
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
KI
T
C
H
E
N
16
0
S
F
RE
S
T
R
O
O
M
S
16
0
S
F
MU
R
A
L
MU
R
A
L
OF
F
I
C
E
80
S
F
ST
O
R
A
G
E
80
S
F
TR
A
S
H
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
GR
E
A
T
R
O
O
M
10
6
8
S
F
DR
O
P
-
O
F
F
(A
C
C
E
S
S
B
L
E
)
PA
R
K
M
E
A
D
O
W
CO
V
E
R
E
D
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
NO
R
T
H
PO
R
C
H
HI
S
T
O
R
I
C
EN
T
R
Y
AC
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
RA
M
P
NE
W
W
A
R
E
H
O
U
S
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
BA
K
E
R
A
V
E
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
0’
32
’
64
’
12
8
’
CM
U
S
C
R
E
E
N
W
A
L
L
CMU SCREEN WALL
CMU SCREEN WALL
MU
R
A
L
MU
R
A
L
PR
O
J
E
C
T
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJECT BOUNDARY
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
Page 546
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
EXHIBIT D
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Fees shall include and be limited to the following:
•City-Wide Systems Fees for Transportation Development – South Zone (Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Chapter 3.28)
•Police Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 13.64)
•Fire Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 3.80)
•Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter
3.76)
Page 547
Background and Context:
On November 11, 2025, the day before the Planning Commission was set to hold a public
hearing regarding the above referenced project, City staff received two letters via email from
Steven Piepkorn with Golden State letter from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
(GSEJA). One of the letters, dated August 2, 2024, had previously been received by staff as
part of the 45-day comment period pursuant to CEQA. Staff forwarded both of these letters
to the Planning Commission for their consideration and generally responded to the concerns
raised as part of the staff presentation. After considering staff’s report, and taking additional
public testimony, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the project by a vote of 4 in favor, 1 against (4-1).
In there November 11, 2025 letter, GSEJA assets that the EIR prepared for the project was
deficient in many ways, arguing that: 1) the project “ignores” existing conditions and is
therefore apparently in violation of SB 535 and/or SB 1000(“Adding Pollution to an Already
Overburdened Community”); 2) the project violates and misrepresents the General Plan
(“General Plan Violations and Systematic Misrepresentations”); 3) fails at analyzing impacts
relative to Environmental Justice (“Environmental Justice Failure”), and that the EIR “…fails
to acknowledge or analyze this pattern of discriminatory land use decisions.”
(“Environmental Racism and the Cumulative Impact of Industrial Concentration”). In
conclusion, the November 11 letter recommends that the Planning Commission reject the
EIR and require the preparation of a comprehensive EIR, which among other things,
mandates net zero emissions.
Staff’s Response:
Staff notes that the developer stated many of the same arguments in their August 2, 2024
letter which was received by the City during the 45-day comment period on the EIR, which
lasted from June 20, 2024 and August 5, 2024, and which were responded to as part of the
Final EIR, which was disseminated via email to Blum, Collins & Ho LLP on behalf of CSEJA
on December 6, 2025 at least 10-days prior to the City Council’s decision on the project
which is scheduled for December 17, 2025.
Staff notes that the concerns raised in the November 11, 2025, letter were already
responded to as part of the FEIR, which included responses to GSEJA’s August 2, 2024,
comment letter. Please reference the Final EIR, inclusive of the City’s response comments,
Attachment 7
Page 548
2
which is accessible on the City’s website by following this link:
https://tinyurl.com/yc32w89b. As described in the responses to GSEJA’s August 2, 2024
letter, and in response to GSEJA’s assertions that the environmental analysis does not
conform to SB 1000 or SB 535, fails at analyzing impacts relative to environmental justice,
and equates to environmental racism, none of the environmental justice legislation nor the
State’s implementing activities requires a different standard for CEQA projects located in
communities identified as disadvantaged communities with higher environmental burdens.
CEQA is an informational tool and does not mandate a prohibition on development projects
in communities designated as having environmental burdens. Regarding assertions that the
project is not consistent with, or misrepresents the General Plan, each of these claims were
already responded to in the FEIR.
In conclusion, the November 11, 2025, letter provides no new substantive information which
would cause the EIR to need to be recirculated, nor does the November 11, 2025, letter
provide any substantive information which would cause a new or comprehensive EIR to be
prepared.
Page 549
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
11 November 2025
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Delivered via email to: sean.mcpherson@cityofrc.us
planning@cityofrc.us
city.clerk@cityofrc.us
Re: Supplemental Comments on 9th and Vineyard Development Project Recirculated
Environmental Impact Report (REIR), SCH No. 2019110456
Commissioners,
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA) has presented arguments regarding the
aforementioned project in the form of a:
• Comment Letter dated 2 August 2024, which objects to the REIR and documents
systematic California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) violations including deficient
environmental justice analysis, inadequate project description, General Plan
inconsistency with prohibited land use designation, insufficient energy modeling
compliance, failure to address cumulative impacts on a disadvantaged community already
experiencing severe pollution burdens, and systematic underestimation of truck trip
generation violating community benefit plan requirements.
GSEJA also provided technical review comments dated 30 July 2024 prepared by Soil Water Air
Protection Enterprise (SWAPE), concluding the project's air quality and health risk impacts may
be underestimated. SWAPE's analysis identifies significant deficiencies in the REIR's air quality
modeling and health risk assessment that systematically underestimate impacts to census tract
6071002105, which ranks in the 98th percentile for PM (particulate matter) 2.5 burden and 88th
percentile for cardiovascular disease.
GSEJA's comprehensive technical review reveals critical deficiencies that warrant the Planning
Commission’s rejection of this proposed 982,096 ft² warehouse development spread across three
buildings with 85 dock doors. The project site is in census tract 6071002105, which ranks in the
76th percentile overall pollution burden, 98th percentile for PM 2.5, 94th percentile for ozone,
88th percentile for cardiovascular disease, and 87th percentile for hazardous waste impacts,
Page 550
2
while the REIR systematically underestimates air quality impacts and fails to provide required
environmental justice analysis for this already overburdened Senate Bill (SB) 535 Disadvantaged
Community.
Adding Pollution to an Already Overburdened Community
This massive warehouse project would be built in census tract 6071002105, a community that
already bears severe environmental burdens. According to the California Environmental
Protection Agency's CalEnviroScreen 4.0 analysis, this community suffers in the following
ways:
Page 551
3
Environmental and Personal Health Crisis:
• 98th percentile for PM 2.5 burden, indicating massive industrial contamination typical of
warehouse districts
• 94th percentile for ozone burden, demonstrating dangerously poor air quality
• 88th percentile for cardiovascular disease, reflecting pollution's severe toll on community
health
• 87th percentile for hazardous waste impacts, showing contamination from industrial
facilities
• 76th percentile overall pollution burden, worse than three-quarters of California
communities
• 75th percentile for diesel particulate matter, demonstrating heavy truck activity pollution
• 63rd percentile for toxic releases, indicating regular exposure to industrial chemicals
• 54th percentile for babies born at low birth weight, revealing multigenerational health
impacts
• 46th percentile for asthma incidence
• SB 535 Disadvantaged Community designation, clearly identifying this as a
disadvantaged community under state law
Community Vulnerability Factors:
• 54% Hispanic, 12% Asian American, 8% African American residents: populations
historically targeted for environmental racism
• 52% lack high school education, which demonstrates educational vulnerability that limits
residents' economic opportunities
• Poor communities often located in areas with high levels of pollution, facing additional
stress that weakens immune systems
• Low educational attainment indicates residents may lack health insurance or access to
vital medical care
SB 1000, California's environmental justice law, was specifically designed to protect
communities like this from additional pollution burdens. The law requires local governments to
identify disadvantaged communities and implement policies to reduce cumulative health risks
rather than worsen them. Government Code Section 65302(h) mandates that local agencies
"identify objectives and policies to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in
disadvantaged communities" through measures including "reduction of pollution exposure" and
"improvement of air quality."
The REIR ignores these existing conditions and the local community's legal protections. It fails
to meaningfully analyze how warehouse operations, 85 dock doors, and round-the-clock truck
traffic will worsen health outcomes for residents who already face the 98th percentile PM 2.5
pollution exposure and 88th percentile cardiovascular disease burden. This breaches CEQA's
fundamental mandate under Public Resources Code Section 21001(b) to "take all action
necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water" and Section 21000(g)
Page 552
4
requiring "major consideration to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent
home and satisfying living environment for every Californian."
When a community already ranks in the 98th percentile for PM 2.5 pollution and 88th percentile
for cardiovascular disease, adding 982,096 ft2 of warehouse development with 85 dock doors
generating hundreds of daily truck trips is not just poor planning—it is a violation of civil rights
and the right to breathe clean air.
Deficient Technical Analysis and Missing Documentation
The REIR fails to provide basic project information required for CEQA compliance, including
floor plans, grading plans with earthwork quantities, detailed site plans, and building elevations
showing heights and materials. Without grading plans, it is impossible to determine truck hauling
trips during construction, directly affecting air quality calculations.
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Data for Census Tract 6071002105, Source: California Environmental Protection
Agency
Page 553
5
Additionally, the REIR excludes Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266) from public
review, preventing meaningful evaluation of project timing, phasing, and community
improvement obligations. The REIR uses CalEEMod for energy modeling despite the State of
California listing only three approved compliance modeling software for Title 24 (CBECC-Com,
EnergyPro, and IES VE)—CalEEMod is NOT approved, resulting in systematic underestimation
of energy impacts. These omissions violate CEQA's requirements for adequate informational
documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)).
General Plan Violations and Systematic Misrepresentations
The REIR contains multiple false claims to evade General Plan requirements.
• First, the project proposes warehouse distribution use in the Neo-Industrial Employment
District, which permits only "small warehouses that are context-sensitive and calibrated
to minimize impacts"—this 982,096 ft2 regional distribution center is explicitly NOT
permitted under this designation.
• Second, the REIR falsely claims 91 daily truck trips when Table 5 in Appendix K-2
clearly shows 343 daily truck trips—nearly four times the 100-truck threshold requiring a
Community Benefit Plan under General Plan Policy RC-5.6.
Page 554
6
• Third, the REIR claims "all loading docks would be screened from public view" when
Figure 2-4 clearly shows loading docks and parking lots located in front of buildings and
visible from Baker Street, 8th Street, 9th Street, and Vineyard Avenue, directly violating
General Plan Policy LC-7.6.
Loading Docks violating GP Policy LC-7.6 – Despite REIR claims that “all loading docks would be screened
from public view”, REIR Figure 2-4 clearly shows loading docks located in front of buildings and visible
from multiple public streets, directly violating General Plan Policy LC-7.6.
Page 555
7
These are not modeling errors—they are deliberate misrepresentations designed to evade
mandatory General Plan requirements.
Environmental Justice Failure
While the REIR mentions CalEnviroScreen percentiles, it provides zero analysis of what those
percentiles mean for this SB 535 Disadvantaged Community's health. The REIR never analyzes
whether it is acceptable to add 982,096 ft2 of warehouse space with 343 daily truck trips to a
community already suffering from 98th percentile PM 2.5 pollution, 88th percentile
cardiovascular disease, and 87th percentile hazardous waste impacts. This community is 54%
Hispanic, 12% Asian American, and 8% African American, with 52% lacking high school
education. CEQA Guidelines Section 15131(c) requires analyzing how project pollution will
interact with existing burdens, whether cumulative health risks are acceptable, and what
additional mitigation is necessary—the REIR does none of this, violating CEQA's environmental
justice requirements and General Plan Policy LC-1.6 requiring development "appropriate to the
needs of disadvantaged communities."
Environmental Racism and the Cumulative Impact of Industrial Concentration
This warehouse project continues a decades-long pattern of environmental racism that has
systematically concentrated polluting facilities in communities of color and low-income areas
while protecting wealthier, predominantly white neighborhoods. The Inland Empire, like many
other inland California communities, have become dumping grounds for logistics facilities that
serve the consumption needs of affluent coastal communities while imposing health burdens on
working-class families and communities of color.
The REIR fails to acknowledge or analyze this pattern of discriminatory land use decisions. It
provides no cumulative impact analysis of the multiple warehouse and industrial projects that
have been approved in the area, creating what environmental justice advocates recognize as a
"sacrifice zone", which is an area where residents are expected to bear health burdens that
would never be tolerated in Newport Beach or other affluent communities.
This discriminatory pattern violates the Fair Housing Act and California's Unruh Civil Rights
Act, which prohibit land use decisions that have a disparate impact on protected classes. As the
California Attorney General has noted, "the burdens of pollution should not be focused on
sensitive populations or on communities that already are experiencing its adverse effects." Yet
that is precisely what this project would do.
The cumulative health impacts from multiple warehouse facilities include:
• Concentrated diesel truck traffic creating corridors of toxic air pollution, contributing to
what health experts term “diesel death zones”, where cumulative pollution exposure
creates severe public health consequences.
Page 556
8
• 24/7 industrial noise disrupting sleep and contributing to stress-related health problems.
• Increased PM and ozone worsening respiratory conditions in a community with 88th
percentile cardiovascular disease and 46th percentile asthma rates
• Traffic safety hazards on residential streets not designed for heavy industrial truck traffic.
• Economic displacement as industrial uses drives out community-serving businesses and
housing opportunities.
The Planning Commission must reject this pattern of environmental injustice. Communities of
color and low-income families deserve the same environmental protections as wealthy
neighborhoods. Children deserve to breathe clean air and attend schools not surrounded by diesel
trucks.
Recommendation
The Planning Commission must reject the inadequate REIR and require preparation of a
comprehensive EIR that mandates net zero emissions, and includes:
• Includes complete project plans: floor plans, grading plans, detailed site plans with
earthwork quantities, and building elevations with heights, colors, and materials
• Includes the complete Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266) for public review
• Provides comprehensive environmental justice analysis as required by CEQA Guidelines
Section 15131(c), SB 1000, and General Plan Policy LC-1.6
• Corrects the false claim of 91 daily truck trips and analyzes actual 343 daily truck trips
• Includes required Community Benefit Plan as mandated by General Plan Policy RC-5.6
(343 trucks exceeds 100-truck threshold)
• Addresses General Plan inconsistency: project proposes warehouse distribution use
prohibited in Neo-Industrial Employment District
• Uses approved Title 24 energy modeling software (CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, or IES VE)
instead of non-compliant CalEEMod
• Includes finding of significance for loading docks visible from public streets violating
General Plan Policy LC-7.6
• Analyzes consistency with General Plan Policy LC-1.6 requiring development
"appropriate to the needs of disadvantaged communities"
• Analyzes consistency with General Plan Policy RC-6.5 requiring 80% GHG reduction
below 1990 levels by 2050
• Includes shade/shadow analysis demonstrating compliance with General Plan Policy RC-
7.12
• Provides General Plan buildout analysis to ensure project is within General Plan EIR
assumptions
• Analyzes Figure LC-1: Vision Diagram designation of site as Neighborhood Activity
Node
Page 557
9
The Planning Commission should conduct meaningful community engagement and outreach, as
required by SB 1000, which involves holding public workshops (in both English and Spanish)
accessible to community members at convenient hours, as well as partner with trusted and rooted
community organizations and canvass affected neighborhoods on foot, as a way to meet the
requirements of SB 1000, as well as understanding the ramifications of implementing such a
large scale change in an impacted community.
Additionally, the Planning Commission should also consider implementing enhanced mitigation
measures that protect community health, such as embarking on zero emission vehicle
requirements for all project-related traffic, prioritizing local community member employment,
and provide health monitoring and reporting systems to reduce the impact of these types of
projects, both now and in the future.
Conclusion
Due to the above-mentioned reasons as well as the reasons listed in the comment letter to the
REIR, GSEJA believes the REIR is flawed, and a revised, comprehensive EIR must be prepared
and recirculated for public review.
We cannot accept a future where children struggle to breathe, and families face heart disease so
that corporations can profit from cheap land in sacrifice zones. Environmental justice demands
that we reject this pattern of discrimination and require meaningful protection for California's
most vulnerable communities.
The REIR's systematic misrepresentations—falsely claiming 91 truck trips when actual analysis
shows 343, falsely claiming the use is permitted when it violates the Neo-Industrial Employment
District, falsely claiming loading docks are screened when site plans show them visible from
public streets—demonstrate bad faith and prevent meaningful public review.
The health of our children and the future of our community are in your hands.
Onwards.
Steven Piepkorn
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
765 N Main Street, Suite 151
Corona, CA 92880
+1 951 279 4697
Page 558
From:Judy Summers
To:Mcpherson, Sean
Cc:Judy Summers
Subject:RE: Comments regarding Notice of Availability of a Draft Environment Impact Report for 9th & Vineyard
Development Project and EIR (State Clearinghouse # 2019110456
Date:Friday, December 5, 2025 2:51:57 PM
Attachments:9th and Vineyard Development Project Final EIR_Revised 10-31-25 (1).pdf
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your response.
In reading the provided response, I noticed that my concern regarding the intersection at
9th & Vineyard, specifically section 3-2, was not addressed.
As you are aware, 9th Street is a two-lane street, and the additional 362 vehicles and trucks
will significantly impact traffic congestion.
Just the other day, while I was heading east on 9th Street and waiting to turn right onto
Vineyard, I observed a troubling scenario. The intersection has a left turn lane and a lane to
go straight, but there is no space for a car to turn right when the light is red. A truck in front
of me was also waiting to turn right, and it took the entire green light to make the turn.
Consequently, no other vehicles were able to proceed through the intersection or turn right
during that time.
Please find the attached picture showing the situation I am describing. In order to mitigate
this traffic nightmare, it is imperative to widen 9th Street and create a dedicated right turn
lane. Although this may somewhat alleviate the congestion, traffic will still be quite
challenging.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
Judy Summers
Judy Summers judysummers@msn.com 909-908-5195
From: Mcpherson, Sean <Sean.McPherson@cityofrc.us>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2025 5:52 PM
To: 'Judy Summers' <JudySummers@msn.com>
Subject: RE: Comments regarding Notice of Availability of a Draft Environment Impact Report for 9th
& Vineyard Development Project and EIR (State Clearinghouse # 2019110456
Hi Ms. Summers,
Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, I am sending you written
responses to your comments (reference email below) on the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (SCH2019110456) for the “9th and Vineyard Development Project.” This item, and the
associated EIR, will be heard at a public hearing before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Attachment 8
Page 559
on December 17, 2025, at which point the project may be approved and the EIR may be
certified. Written responses to your agency’s comments on the Draft Environmental Impact
Report can be found by following this link:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/ezgw6i02xipw2atbx5iv8/APDSOu27n3HT6sFJUNe3fKc/DEIR
%209th%20and%20Vineyard%20Development%20Project%20and%20EIR?
dl=0&preview=9th+and+Vineyard+Development+Project+Final+EIR_Revised+10-31-
25.pdf&rlkey=is2wz9w5mgwjiezsbt50d6c1e&subfolder_nav_tracking=1 (your email and our
subsequent response comments begin on page 2-6).
If the above link does not work, please note that the same documents can be found by
accessing the Planning Department’s webpage on the City’s website at
https://www.cityofrc.us/community-development/planning. All environmental documents for
this project can be found through this webpage by scrolling toward the bottom and clicking the
“CEQA Documents Available for Review” tab under the heading “Current Projects & Planning
Initiatives.” All environmental documentation, including the Final EIR documentation, for this
project is under the link titled “DEIR 9th and Vineyard Development Project and EIR.”
The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you for your input and participation in this important
process.
Thanks,
Sean McPherson, AICP
Principal Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909-774-4307
From: Mcpherson, Sean
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 9:27 AM
To: Judy Summers <JudySummers@msn.com>
Subject: RE: Comments regarding Notice of Availability of a Draft Environment Impact Report for 9th
& Vineyard Development Project and EIR (State Clearinghouse # 2019110456
Judy,
Thank you for your email. Please note that your comments have been received and will be included
with the project packet to be delivered to the Planning Commission and City Council at such time
that public hearing(s) are scheduled.
Page 560
You don't often get email from judysummers@msn.com. Learn why this is important
As a friendly note, I am aware that the developer is hoping to schedule a neighborhood meeting at
some point over the next few weeks. Please be aware that you may be receiving a separate notice
for that meeting at some point in the coming days.
Please feel free to reach out to me directly with any additional questions you may have.
Thanks,
Sean McPherson, AICP
Principal Planner
Planning and Economic Development Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730
From: Judy Summers <JudySummers@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 2:14 PM
To: Mcpherson, Sean <Sean.McPherson@cityofrc.us>
Cc: Judy Summers <JudySummers@msn.com>
Subject: Comments regarding Notice of Availability of a Draft Environment Impact Report for 9th &
Vineyard Development Project and EIR (State Clearinghouse # 2019110456
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello
I reside at 8692 9th street unit 6 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730. I am writing with
concerns regarding the development of warehouses on 9th and Vineyard.
My biggest concern is the increased traffic from cars and trucks.
9th street is part of a residential neighborhood with only a two-lane highway. There is
an elementary school at 9th and Baker and many children walk this way home.
Commercial Truck traffic has increased dramatically with the new warehouses
constructed on the north side of the street.
I am concerned regarding the already increased traffic and safety concerns for the
elementary school children who walk this route, and the impact of backed up traffic.
The street does NOT have sidewalks all the way down.
On the Southwest corner of 9th and Vineyard (no sidewalk) there used to be enough
room to turn right when there was a red light. They have blocked that off so it is down
to a left turn lane and a straight through lane. Traffic is already backing up there
Page 561
causing delays. Your report stated that the “9th street driveway would provide
inbound/outbound access for passenger vehicles and trucks; however trucks
exiting onto 9th street would be restricted to right turn only.”
This driveway would cause a traffic nightmare. Since this is two lane street, it already
backs up traffic who are trying to turn right. Due to increased traffic and trucks, you
no longer make it through the green light and need to wait for several additional light
changes. I can only imagine with 362 extra vehicles and ? trucks how this will make
navigation much more difficult. For this to possibly work, the street needs to have 2
lanes each direction in addition to a right turn lane. I suggest you complete a traffic
study (when school is in session) and check traffic conditions between 7 am and 9
am.
As it is, when you gave approval for the warehouses on the north side of the
street, they knocked down part of our complex’s brick wall and has never paid
for it or fixed it. We now have a leaning brick wall that is about to fall over. I
would have thought City Inspectors would have made the contractors
accountable. Our HOA has reached out to them several times with no
response.
Also, the Internet Service available in Rancho Cucamonga is horrible and always
down. Even though my condominium was built with underground fiber optic cabling in
2008, the few internet providers that service RC do not offer it. With these increased
warehouses the service has gotten worse, so for those of us trying to work from home
it is not feasible or affordable. If you are going to approve these warehouses, the city
should make the Internet providers provide 5g fiber optic internet and make the
corporation putting in warehouse pay for it
These may seem like small concerns to you, but to those of us who live in the
neighborhood it is an issue. When the City put in the Skate Park next to Cask &
Cleaver the crime rate has doubled. You hear people at park all night long, M80’s
and shootings. With the warehouses, more homeless will come and drugs and
crime. It is already difficult enough to get sheriffs to this area of the city.
I would like a response that this was received and provided to committee.
Remember, all residents of Rancho Cucamonga deserve the same treatment, no
matter where we live.
Judy Summers
judysummers@msn.com
909.908.5195
Page 562
P: (626) 314-3821
E: info@mitchtsailaw.com Mitchell M. Tsai
Law Firm
139 S. Hudson Ave., Suite 200
Pasadena, California 91101
VIA E-MAIL
December 16, 2025
Sean McPherson
City Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Em: sean.mcpherson@cityofrc.us
RE: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9th & Vineyard Development Project; City
Council Agenda Item G2
Dear Mr. McPherson and the Members of the City Council:
On behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (“Western
Carpenters” or “WSRCC”), my Office is submitting these comments for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga’s City Council meeting addressing the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, 9th & Vineyard Development Project; City Council Agenda Item G2
(“Project”).
WSRCC would like to express its support for this Project. After further reviewing this
Project, WSRCC believes that the Project will benefit the environment and the local
economy by practicing protocols that will protect worker health and safety and will
incorporate adequate environmental mitigation.
Should the City have any questions or concerns, the City should feel free to contact my
office.
Sincerely,
__________________________
Ananya Raghavan
Attorneys for Western States Regional Council of Carpenters
2025-12-17- Regular City Council Meeting - Item G2 - Correspondence Received
Page 1 of 2
REVISION:
Attached is a revised Attachment Nos. 05 (Resolution) and 06 (“Ordinance” and “Development
Agreement”) for Public Hearing item G2. Following publication of the agenda and associated staff
report and attachments for Item G2, staff and the City Attorney noted typos and inconsistencies
in the Resolution and Ordinance. The CEQA findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
have also been included with the Resolution. In addition, the applicant requested minor revisions
to the Development Agreement. After reviewing the requested revisions to the Development
Agreement, staff supports edits to Section 10(B) and Section 11(B)(vi) that delete an unnecessary
parenthetical statement and references to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Further, a
typographic error was noted by the applicant in Exhibit D to the Development Agreement. This
error has been corrected in the revised attachment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve Design Review (DRC2019-
00742), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009),
Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266) as revised, and Certificate of Appropriateness
(DRC2019- 00854) through the adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution for the subject
Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
DATE: December 17, 2025
TO: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
FROM: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
Sean McPherson, Principal Planner
Jared Knight, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider First Reading of City Council Ordinance No. 1052
to Approve Development Agreement DRC2022-00266 to be Read by Title Only
and Waive Further Reading: to Consider a City Council Resolution to Adopt
Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173),
Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009), and Certificate of Appropriateness
(DRC2019-00854) for the Development of Three (3) Concrete Tilt-up Industrial
Buildings Totaling Approximately 982,096 Square Feet on Approximately 45.96
Net Acres Bound by Vineyard Avenue to the East, 9th Street to the North, Baker
Avenue to the West, and the BNSF/Metrolink Railroad Line to the South; APN:
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, -97. An Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 2019110456) was Prepared for the Project. (Primary Case
File No: Design Review (DRC2019-00742). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-101 AND
ORDINANCE NO. 1052) (CITY)
MEMORANDUM
Engineering Services Department
Staff Report Memo: 12/17/2025 Item G2 – Public Hearing Item
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 5 – Revised City Council Resolution with Findings and SOC with COA
Attachment 6 – Revised Draft Ordinance No. 1052 and Development Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2019-00742, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20173,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00009, DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2022-00266, AND CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS DRC2019-00854 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THREE NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALLING 982,096 SQUARE
FEET ON A CERTAIN 45.96 ACRE PROPERTY BOUNDED BY
VINEYARD AVENUE TO THE EAST, 9TH STREET TO THE NORTH,
BAKER AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND BNSF/METROLINK RAILROAD
TO THE SOUTH. APNS: 0207-271-25, - 27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96,
AND -97
A. Recitals.
1. The applicant, CP Logistics Vineyard LLC, filed an application for the approval of
Design Review DRC2019-00742, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173, Conditional Use
Permit DRC2022-00009, Development Agreement DRC2022-00266, and Certificate of
Appropriateness DRC2019-00854 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th of November 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application recommending
that the City Council approve the proposed project and concluded said hearing on that
date recommending that the City Council approve the project as proposed by a four-to-
one vote.
3. On the 17th of December 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2025, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The 45.96-acre project site is bounded by Vineyard Avenue to the east, 9th
Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west, and the BNSF/Metrolink railroad to the
south; and
b. The project site includes a historic structure hereafter referred to as the Baker
House, located at 8803 Baker Avenue. The Baker House is currently owned by CP Logistics
Vineyard LLC and is not currently in use; and
c. The application is for the development of three new industrial warehouse
buildings to be located on three new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 611,574
square feet including approximately 4,000 square feet of office space, Building 2 will total
approximately 107,541 square feet including approximately 4,000 square feet of office space,
and Building 3 will total approximately 262,981 square feet including approximately 5,000
square feet of office space. The project is in compliance with the applicable parking development
standards and provides 362 parking stalls and 168 trailer parking stalls; and
d. The application includes the subdivision of the project site into four new parcels
to accommodate the proposed new buildings and the Baker House: Parcel 1 which will total
approximately 28 acres and will be developed with Building 1, Parcel 2 which will total
approximately 6 acres and will be developed with Building 2, Parcel 3 which will total
approximately 12 acres and be improved with Building 3, and Parcel 4 which totals approximately
1 acre and will include the Baker House; and
e. The application includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the
following uses to operate at the site: Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light - Large;
and
f. The project also includes the rehabilitation of the Baker House, in compliance
with the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Places for future use by the
city. Pursuant to the Certificate of Appropriateness, the city will review the rehabilitation and future
use in conformance with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance; and
g. The project also includes a Development Agreement (DRC2022-00266) which
is memorialized upon the approval of related Ordinance 1052 and which is hereby included
with this Resolution by reference; and
h. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project
site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site
Vacant
Neo-Industrial
Employment
(NI) District
Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
Industrial,
Residential,
Open Space
Neighborhood
Center, Neo-
Industrial
Employment (NI),
Suburban
Neighborhood Low,
Industrial
Employment (IE),
General Open
Space and Facilities (OS)
Industrial Employment (IE), Neo-
Industrial (NI), Parks (P),
Neighborhood General 3-Limited
(NG3-L), Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC), Medium
Residential (M)
South
BNSF Railway,
Industrial,
Residential,
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neo-Industrial
Employment (NI);
Low Density
Residential (within
Ontario),
Neighborhood
Commercial
(within Ontario)
Neo-Industrial (NI); Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) (within Ontario),
Low Density Residential (LDR5)
(within Ontario)
West Residential Traditional
Neighborhood District Low Medium Residential (LM)
East Industrial and
Cucamonga Creek
Open Space (OS) and Neo-Industrial Employment (NI)
Flood Control/Utility Corridor (FC/UC),
Neo-Industrial (NI)
3. The City Council hereby approves Design Review DRC2019-00742 as a part of the
application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section
17.20.040 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The project
site's General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo Industrial Employment. This land use
designation supports industrial uses and the proposed industrial buildings have been designed
such that they will have minimal impact upon neighboring residential and commercial uses.
Uses of similar scale are also present nearby; and
b. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is located within the
Neo-Industrial (NI) zone, which promotes light industrial uses with low environmental impacts,
and allows for the operation of Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light - Large
uses with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Further, civic uses are permitted by right
relative to any future City use of the Baker House building; and
c. The proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code for the zone in which it is located. The project was deemed complete on
June 16th, 2021, prior to the adoption of the most current zoning and development standards.
At the time it was deemed complete, the project site was located within the General Industrial
(GI) Zone. As such, the development standards that applied to the General Industrial (GI) zone
on June 16, 2021, apply. The project complies with all applicable development standards for
the General Industrial Zone as of June 16, 2021; and
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review determines that the majority of
impacts created by the project will be mitigated to less than significant levels, with the
exception of related noise impacts which will exceed thresholds even with mitigations. The
project also results in a significant and unavoidable impact related to land use planning and
recommended proximity of industrial uses to residential neighborhoods. The Planning
Commission recognizes that these impacts require the City Council to adopt a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, balancing these impacts against the project's economic
development, job creation and infrastructure improvements benefits that align with the City's
long-term goals.
4. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173 as
part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code
Section 16.20.060 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives
of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The
proposal is to subdivide a vacant property of approximately 45.96 acres into 4 numbered
parcels for the purpose of industrial development and preservation and future use of the Baker
House. The project site's General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo Industrial Employment.
This land use designation supports industrial uses with a reduced or minimal impact upon
adjacent residential uses. Community/Civic uses are also permitted by right in this zone. The
proposed industrial buildings have been designed such that they will have minimal impact
upon neighboring residential and commercial uses. Uses of similar scale are also present
nearby; and
b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code for the zone in which it is located. The project was deemed complete
on June 16th, 2021, prior to the adoption of the most current zoning and development
standards. At the time it was deemed complete, the project site was located within the General
Industrial (GI) Zone. As such, the development standards that applied to the General Industrial
(GI) zone on June 16, 2021, apply. The General Industrial zoning district required lots of a
minimum area of half an acre, and a minimum width of 100 feet. The lots proposed by the
tentative parcel map are all in excess of 1 acre in area and 100 feet in width. The project
complies with all applicable development standards for the General Industrial district; and
c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will
not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential
environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures
that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
5. The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 as part
of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to Development Code Section
17.20.060 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan. The project site's
General Plan Land Use Designation is Neo-lndustrial Employment (NI), which permits the
proposed industrial use.
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is located within the
Neo-lndustrial (NI) zone, which promotes light industrial uses with low environmental impacts,
and allows for the operation of Wholesale and Distribution - Medium, Distribution/Fulfillment
Center, Large, E-commerce Distribution, Storage Warehouse, and Manufacturing Light -
Large uses with an approved Conditional Use Permit; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use
being proposed, including access, utilities, and absence of physical constraints that would
make conduct of the proposed use undesirable. The project site is well suited to the proposed
industrial uses as it is located along multiple street frontages, thereby providing multiple
points of ingress/egress and emergency services access; and
d. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use
would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including
transportation and service facilities. The proposed use is of a similar type, size, and intensity
as existing industrial uses in the vicinity; and
e. The proposed use will not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to detrimental
to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to
persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is
located. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts
related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. Where there exist significant and unavoidable impacts,
specifically relative to noise and land use planning relative to the proximity of industrial uses
near residential neighborhoods, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been
prepared for the City Council's consideration in order to weigh these impacts with the
anticipated benefits of the project; and
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including
police, fire, streets, and other public utilities. The applicant shall provide traffic improvements
to ensure that surrounding public streets and intersections maintain sufficient levels of service
during construction and operation of the proposed buildings.
6. The City Council hereby approves Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2019-00854,
and makes the following findings pursuant to Development Code Section 17.18.040 in support
of the recommendation:
a. The proposed rehabilitation will not result in a substantial adverse change to
the historic resource within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Due to vandalism and deterioration of existing materials, replacement of mortar, roofing,
doors, and windows may be necessary in order to rehabilitate the historic structure. All
required replacement of existing materials shall be done with materials that closely match the
original materials in appearance, texture, and color, ensuring the preservation of the
structure's historic character. Upon implementation of these measures to preserve the
structure, the future community/civic use of this structure will not result in substantial adverse
change to the historic resource; and
b. The project is consistent with the purposes of the Historic Preservation
Commission, and more specifically Development Code Sections 17.18.030 (Maintenance of
Historic Resources) and 17.18.040 (Certificate of Appropriateness). The project aligns with
the intent of these regulations by maintaining the architectural integrity of the historic
structure. The proposed rehabilitation, including the replacement materials, will preserve the
visual character of the structure as an example of "Folk Architecture". This rehabilitation will
increase the longevity of the structure and allow for its use as a public resource; and
c. The project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties by complying with the applicable Standards for
Rehabilitation. Standard 2 states, "the historic character of a property shall be retained and
preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial
relationships that characterize a property will be avoided." The applicant proposes to
rehabilitate the existing historical structure through the removal of graffiti and the replacement
of deteriorated or missing structural elements with materials that are substantially the same
as the original materials. Standard 6 states, "deteriorated historic features shall be repaired
rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive
feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and where possible,
materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary and
physical evidence." The brick-and-mortar construction of the historic structure is a distinctive
feature of the folk architecture style. In order to maintain this distinctive feature, it is necessary
to evaluate and replace the mortar where required to ensure the longevity of the historic
resource.
7. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and
determinations in connection with the approval of the application:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2019110456), has been prepared for this
project. The EIR was circulated for public review starting on March 15, 2022, and
concluding on May 2, 2022. In response to this review, public concerns were raised
regarding the content and adequacy of the analysis prepared for the original EIR. The
primary public concern involved the inclusion of emissions credits from structures which
had previously existed on the site, but that were not occupied. Further, those structures
were demolished between February and April 2022. Because the project site is now vacant
and undeveloped, except for the Baker House, the decision was made to update technical
studies for air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and
transportation based on the current site conditions. Accordingly, the DEIR was then
recirculated and distributed for a new 45-day public review period on June 20th, 2024, with
the comment period concluding on August 5th, 2024, after which the City prepared a Final EIR
(FEIR); and
b. The FEIR has been completed, and has analyzed the environmental impacts
of the construction and operation of the proposed project; and
c. The FEIR contains the information required by CEQA Guidelines Section
15132, including without limitation, the Draft EIR and all revisions and additions thereto,
comments on the Draft EIR received from various agencies, organizations, companies,
individuals or other interested parties, and the City’s responses to the comments received on
the Draft EIR, and findings as required by CEQA statue; and
d. The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all
recommended mitigation measures, certain impacts would result in significant and
unavoidable impacts. These include impacts to Land Use Planning (Appendix G, Section XI),
and Noise (Appendix G, Section XIII). Specifically, the project proposes new large industrial
development to be located approximately 50 feet from the nearest existing residential
development, which conflicts with General Plan Land Use policy LC-7.4, which discourages
large industrial projects to be located within 1,000 feet of existing and planned residential
development. Further, regarding impacts to noise, as the developer anticipates the proposed
buildings to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, anticipated noise generated from the use
would be 60.2 decibels (dBA) as measured at nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), as
measured from the residences located along the north side of 9th Street. Further, noise
thresholds will also be exceeded in Ontario, specifically as measured from the residences
located on the southside of 8th Street. Whereas the City of Ontario establishes nighttime
thresholds of 49 dBA (10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), which is the current measured ambient noise
level, operations from the project will result in approximately 58 dBA at this location along the
southside of 8th Street. As such, the operational characteristics of the proposed project will
exceed the noise thresholds for both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario;
and
e. As part of project approval, the City Council has considered a CEQA Findings
and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which acknowledges these unavoidable
impacts, but which also acknowledges project benefits. The CEQA Findings and Statement
of Overriding Considerations is included with this Resolution as “Exhibit A” and is hereby
adopted upon approval of the project
8. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6 and 7 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every
condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference. The effectiveness of the tentative map, design review, conditional use permit
and certificate of appropriateness are contingent upon the developer’s execution of the
development agreement.
9. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF DECEMBER 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the 17TH day of December 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:
ORDINANCE NO. 1052
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2022-00266 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE NEW WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 982,096 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 45.96-ACRE PROJECT SITE BOUND BY 9TH STREET TO THE NORTH, BAKER AVENUE TO THE WEST, VINEYARD AVENUE TO THE EAST, AND ADJACENT TO 8TH STREET TO THE SOUTH; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, AND -97.
A. Recitals.
1. WHEREAS, CP Logistics Vineyard LLC (the “Applicant”), filed an application for
and negotiated the terms of Development Agreement DRC2022-00266, as described in the title
of this Ordinance and attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject
development agreement is referred to as the “application" or the “Development Agreement”; and
2. WHEREAS, On November 12, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded
said hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted 4 in favor and 1 against
to recommend that the City Council approve Development Agreement DRC2022-00226; and
3. WHEREAS, On December 17, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date, and thereafter introduced for first reading this
Ordinance; and
4. WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have
occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on December 17, 2025, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the approximately 45.96-acre project site which
comprises nine parcels, APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97. The project
site is bounded by 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west, Vineyard Avenue to the east,
and is adjacent to 8th Street to the south. The project site is currently vacant, with the exception
of an existing cell tower, located approximately 300 linear feet west of Vineyard Avenue along the
project’s southern property line, which would remain and not be removed. The project site also
contains a vacant historic structure on the west side of the site at 8803 Baker Avenue (the “Baker
House”); and
b. Concurrent with this application, the Applicant has also applied for a
Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20173) to consolidate the existing nine parcels into four new
parcels, Design Review (DRC2019-00742), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2022-00009) and
Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854) to permit the use and construction of the
proposed project; and
c. Development of the project is governed by the City’s General Plan,
Development Code, all entitlements associated with the project, and the subject Development
Agreement between the City and Applicant; and
d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the
project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial Employment (NI)
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North
Industrial,
Residential, Open
Space
Neighborhood Center, Neo-
Industrial Employment (NI),
Suburban Neighborhood Low,
Industrial Employment (IE),
General Open Space and
Facilities (OS)
Industrial Employment
(IE), Neo-Industrial
(NI), Parks (P),
Neighborhood General
3-Limited (NG3-L),
Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC),
Medium Residential (M)
South
BNSF Railway,
Industrial,
Residential,
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neo-Industrial Employment (NI);
Low Density Residential (within
Ontario), Neighborhood
Commercial (within Ontario)
Neo-Industrial (NI);
Neighborhood
Commercial (CN)
(within Ontario), Low
Density Residential
(LDR5) (within Ontario)
West Residential Traditional Neighborhood District Low Medium
Residential (LM)
East Industrial and
Cucamonga Creek
Open Space (OS) and Neo-
Industrial Employment (NI)
Flood Control/Utility
Corridor (FC/UC), Neo-
Industrial (NI)
e. The project is for the development of three new industrial warehouse
buildings on four new parcels of land: Building 1 will total approximately 611,574 square feet
including office space of approximately 4,000 square feet, Building 2 will total approximately
107,541 square feet including office space of approximately 4,000 square feet , and Building
3 will total approximately 262,981 square feet including potential office space of approximately
5,000 square feet . The project provides 362 parking stalls and 168 trailer parking stalls; and
f. The project also includes the retention, rehabilitation and reuse of the
Baker House, in compliance with the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties for use by the City as a community center. Pursuant to the Certificate of
Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854), the City will review the rehabilitation and future use in
conformance with the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance.
g. As part of the Project, and in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City has prepared Environmental Impact Report SCH No.
2019110456 (EIR), which analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project and
related approvals; and
h. Pursuant to Section 17.22.060 of the Development Code, Development
Agreements have been determined to be beneficial to the public in that:
i. Development Agreements increase the certainty in the approval of
development projects, thereby preventing the waste of resources, reducing the
cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging investment in and
commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum efficient
utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
ii. Development Agreements provide assurance to the applicant for a
development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may
proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and
regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, thereby strengthening the
public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive
planning, and reducing the economic costs of development.
iii. Development Agreements enable the City to plan for and finance public
facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, sewerage, transportation,
drinking water, school, and utility facilities, thereby removing a serious
impediment to the development of new housing.
i. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment is being made and
entered into for the project to ensure that the above three goals are fulfilled; and
j. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code
including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage.
SECTION 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Sections
1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The project site
comprises nine parcels: APN: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97. The General
Plan designation for each of the nine parcels is Neo-Industrial Employment (NI) District, which
permits the proposed industrial use.
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Wholesale and Distribution Medium,
Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large, E-Commerce Distribution, Storage warehouse, and
Manufacturing, Light-Large are permitted within the Neo-Industrial (NI) District subject to the
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009 was submitted for
the operation of the uses listed above..
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code. The uses listed above are permitted within the Neo-Industrial
Employment (NI) District upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project complies
with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking
and design.
d. The proposed use is in conformance with the City’s Historic Preservation
Ordinance. Pursuant to the Certificate of Appropriateness (DRC2019-00854), the City will review
the rehabilitation and future use of the Baker House to require conformance with the City’s Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
e. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental
impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these
impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 4. The Development Agreement, in addition to the Tentative Parcel Map,
Design Review, Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Appropriateness (collectively, the
“Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the
City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an
environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project.
By separate Resolution No. 2025-101, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings
and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2025-101, is incorporated herein by reference,
and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that
constitute the record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning
Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set
forth therein are made applicable to the Project.
SECTION 5. On the basis of the foregoing and the totality of the administrative record
before it, the City Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2022-00266 as shown
in Exhibit 1.
SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid,
or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or
effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of
December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Clerk
EXHIBIT 1
Development Agreement
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Record at the Request of and when Recorded
Mail to:
Kim Sevy
City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
APNs: 0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -
94, -96, and -97
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DRC2022-00266
REGARDING THE 9TH AND VINEYARD WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement” or this “Development Agreement”) is
made and entered into as of the “Effective Date” set forth herein, by and between CP LOGISTICS
VINEYARD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (“City”).
RECITALS
Section 1. On December 17, 2025 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(“Council”) adopted the following resolutions:
A. Resolution 2025-101, approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2022-00009
(inclusive of following uses to be vested in perpetuity and approved separately via either a
Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) or Minor Use Permit (“MUP”): Wholesale and Distribution,
Medium (CUP); Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large (MUP); E-Commerce Distribution (CUP);
Storage Warehouse (CUP); Manufacturing, Light – Large (MUP)); and
B. Resolution 2025-101, approving Design Review DRC2019-00742; and
C. Resolution 2025-101, approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20173; and
D. Resolution 2025-101, approving Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2019-00854;
and
E. Resolution 2025-101, certifying, after making appropriate finding, Environmental
Impact Report (“EIR”) identified as SCH No. 2019110456.
Section 2. Collectively, the Resolutions identified in Section 1 of the recitals (collectively,
“Project Entitlements”) amended the City’s land use regulations to permit the redevelopment of
the site with three industrial buildings with warehouse distribution uses and ancillary office space,
including the 611,574 square-foot (“sf”) in Building 1, 107,541 sf in Building 2, and 262,981 sf in
-2-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Building 3, along with the construction of internal drive aisles, parking, on-site landscaping,
lighting, and utility connections.
Section 3. California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. authorizes cities to enter into
binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property
for the development of such property. Developer is owner of the Site, as defined below and
generally described as a 45.96-acre site bound by 9th Street to the north, Baker Avenue to the west,
Vineyard Avenue to the east, and adjacent to 8th Street to the south, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California comprising tax Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs)
0207-271-25, -27, -39, -40, -89, -93, -94, -96, and -97, and has a legal interest in the real property
subject to this Agreement.
Section 4. City and Developer mutually desire to enter into this Development Agreement to
implement the Project.
Section 5. On December 17, 2025, City adopted its Ordinance No. 1052 (the “Approving
Ordinance”), thereby approving this Development Agreement between the City and Developer,
which is effective as of ________________. All requirements of the California Environment
Quality Act have been met with respect to the Project, Project Entitlements, and this Agreement,
and this Agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following
terms shall have the following meaning:
“Approving Ordinance” means Ordinance 1052, which approved this Agreement.
“Baker House” means the abandoned home located on west side of the Site and having an address
of 8803 Baker Avenue.
“Building 1” means the 611,574 sf building identified as “Building 1” in the Development Plan.
“Building 2” means the 107,541 sf building identified as “Building 2” in the Development Plan.
“Building 3” means the 262,981 sf building identified as “Building 3” in the Development Plan.
“City” means the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
“Developer” means CP Logistics Vineyard LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
“Development Plan” means those plans, specifications, and images attached hereto, collectively
marked as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference.
“Effective Date” means the date that this Agreement is executed by the City and Developer as set
forth on the signature page hereto, and the Approving Ordinance becomes effective.
-3-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
“Material Handling Equipment” means all equipment intended for use in connection with the
Project’s operation for the purpose of loading or unloading goods and materials, including all
forklifts.
“Project” means the proposed development of the Site, consistent with the terms and conditions of
the Project Entitlements.
“Project Entitlements” mean the Resolutions described in recital Sections 1 through 2.
“RC Fiber” means the high speed broadband internet service and corresponding fiber-optic
infrastructure City provides and operates.
“Sidewalks” means the sidewalks identified by the City in the area bounded by Arrow Route,
Grove Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
“Site” means the real property that is the subject of the Project Entitlements and as legally
described, depicted and identified in Exhibit “A-1” and Exhibit “A-2”.
“Traffic Calming” means traffic calming enhancements/improvements the area bounded by Arrow
Route, Grove Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
“Trees” means the trees identified by the City within the area bounded by Arrow Route, Grove
Avenue, 8th Street, and Vineyard Avenue.
Section 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of this Agreement and shall be enforceable as any
other provision of this Agreement.
Section 3. Interest of Developer. Developer warrants and represents that, as of the Effective
Date, it will have legal title to or an equitable interest in the Site; that it has full legal right to enter
into this Agreement; and that the persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer have
been duly authorized to do so.
Section 4. Binding Effect of Agreement. Developer hereby subjects the Project and the Site
to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the
Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as
set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding
upon Developer’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Project. Each and every contract,
deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Project or any portion
thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the
covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such
covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument.
The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of
such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of
the Site by Developer and the future occupants of the Project, the intended beneficiaries of such
covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this
Agreement is adopted.
-4-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 5. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between
City and Developer is such that City and Developer are each an independent party and neither is
the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever and neither shall be considered to be
the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever.
Section 6. Term of Agreement.
A. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall
continue for eight (8) consecutive calendar years thereafter, unless the Term is otherwise
terminated, modified, or extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. So long
as there are no material changes to the Project, the Developer is not then in breach beyond the
notice and cure periods set forth in this Agreement, and the Developer has made all payments to
the City as required pursuant to this Agreement, Developer has an option to extend the Term one
time for an additional two (2) years upon mutual consent of the Parties. To exercise this option,
Developer must, no less than ninety (90) days’ prior to the expiration of the Term, both: (i) provide
City with written notice of the intent to exercise the option and (ii) pay to City one million dollars
($1,000,000.00). Upon receipt of such notice and payment, City will provide written confirmation
that the Developer’s option to extend the Term has been exercised and accepted. The Term shall
not be extended until City provides written confirmation to Developer.
B. Notwithstanding Subsection A above, this Agreement and the Project Entitlements
shall terminate unless Developer obtains a building permit for the construction of the Project or
the Baker House Improvements defined below within three (3) calendar years after the Effective
Date and then construction commences on the Project or the Baker House Improvements within
five (5) calendar years after the Effective Date. If Developer fails to perform by either (i) not
obtaining a building permit for construction, or (ii) not commencing construction in accordance
with the preceding sentence, then the Agreement and the Project Entitlements shall be of no further
force or effect and City shall have no further obligations under this Agreement or to return any
fees collected by City pursuant to this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, if Developer
(i) obtains a building permit for construction of the Baker House Improvements within three (3)
calendar years after the Effective Date, and (ii) commences construction on the Baker House
Improvements within five (5) calendar years after the Effective Date, then this Section 6(B) shall
no longer be in effect or otherwise enforceable.
Section 7. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee
Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties to provide
for the timing of development resulting in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of
development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the parties’ intent to cure that deficiency
by acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have the right (without obligation), subject
to the provisions of this Agreement, to complete the Project in such order and at such rate and at
such times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment.
Section 8. Assignment. In the event of a proposed transfer of interest in the Site or any portion
thereof or in this Agreement by Developer to a transferee, Developer agrees to comply with the
following conditions:
-5-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
(i) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall
provide the City with written notice thereof along with written evidence and
documentation, of a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the City,
demonstrating the experience, capability, competence, and financial ability
of the proposed assignee to carry out and complete the Development Plan
and comply with the terms of this Agreement.
(ii) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall also
provide evidence that the transferee will assume in writing through an
assignment and assumption agreement all remaining obligations of
Developer under this Agreement. The assignment and assumption
agreement shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney.
(iii) The City Manager shall have consented to the assignment of this
Agreement, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or
conditioned.
Any assignment of this Agreement not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions
shall constitute an event of default by the Developer pursuant to Section 18. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon any
transferee whether or not such an assignment and assumption agreement is signed by the assignee
upon acquiring the Property.
Section 9. General Standards and Restrictions Pertaining to Development of the Site.
The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this Development
Agreement:
A. Developer shall have the right to develop the Project on the Site in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this Agreement and City shall have the right to control development
of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
B. The type, density, intensity, configuration of uses allowed, size, and location of
buildings and other improvements and provisions for the reservation or dedication of land for
public purposes, location of public improvements, together with other terms and conditions of
development applicable to the Site, shall be as set forth in this Development Agreement, including
the Development Plan.
C. Public improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, irrigation, sidewalk,
and traffic improvements, as set forth in the Development Plan, if any, shall be installed by the
Developer.
Section 10. Effect of City Regulations on Development of Project. Except as expressly
provided in this Agreement, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained
in City’s ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance, in effect as of June 23, 2021, the date the City
considered the Development Plan to be deemed complete, shall apply to the construction and
development of the Project. The foregoing sentence does not apply to Conditional Use Permit
DRC2022-0009, which covers the uses of the Project contemplated by this Agreement.
-6-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A. The provisions of this Section 10 shall not preclude the application to the
development of the Site those changes in City ordinances, regulations, plans, or specifications
which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations as
provided in California Government Code Section 65869.5 or any successor provision or
provisions. In the event such changes in the law prevent or preclude compliance with one or more
of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or
suspended or performance thereof delayed, as may be necessary to comply with such changes in
the law.
B. The category of Development Impact Fees (“DIF”) applicable to the Project and
attached as Exhibit “D” shall be those in effect as of the Agreement’s Effective Date; however the
existing DIF and other development fees associated with the construction and development of the
Project, including but not limited to land use approvals, development fees, building permits, etc.,
shall be pursuant to the rates as annually adjusted and in effect at the time application is made for
such approvals or permits. Developer shall pay all such fees in accordance with the ordinances
and regulations in effect at the time of payment, except that Developer shall pay the Affordable
Housing Development Impact Fee (“AH DIF”) in accordance with the following schedule:
i. Thirty percent (30%) of the total AH DIF for the Project prior to or upon
issuance of the first building permit for the Baker House;
ii. Thirty percent (30%) of the total AH DIF for the Project prior to or upon
satisfaction of the Developer obligations as set forth in Section 11(B) below; and
iii. Forty percent (40%) prior to or upon issuance of the first building permit
for Building 1, Building 2, or Building 3 of the Project.
C. City may only apply new ordinances, rules, regulations, plans, and specifications
to the development of the Site after the Effective Date if such new rules and regulations are not
inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, and fall under one of the following categories:
i. Processing fees and charges imposed by the City to cover the estimated
actual costs to City of processing applications for development approvals, provided that such fees
and charges are uniformly imposed by the City at similar stages of project development on all
similar applications;
ii. General or special taxes, including, but not limited to, property taxes, sales
taxes, parcel taxes, transient occupancy taxes, business taxes, which may be applied to the Property
or to businesses occupying the Property, provided that the tax is of general applicability City-wide
and does not burden the Property disproportionately to other similar properties within the City;
iii. Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications,
notices, documentation of findings, records, manner in which hearings are conducted, reports,
recommendations, initiation of appeals, and any other matters of procedure; provided such
regulations are uniformly imposed by the City on all matters and do not result in any unreasonable
decision-making delays; or
-7-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
iv. Ordinances, rules, regulations, plans, or specifications the Developer
consents to in writing.
D. Nothing herein shall prevent the application of health and safety regulations (e.g.,
fire, building, and seismic, plumbing, and electric codes) that become applicable to the City as a
whole.
Section 11. Developer’s Obligations. In consideration of the rights and benefits Developer is
guaranteed under this Agreement, the Developer agrees to provide each and every one of the
community benefits set forth in this Section 11.
A. Designation of City of Rancho Cucamonga as Point of Sale for Material Handling
Equipment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designated as the point of sale for the
Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. Developer shall include a
requirement in all tenant leases that tenants shall designate the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the
point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. City shall be a
third-party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases. City shall only be a third-party
beneficiary with respect to such terms related to Material Handling Equipment and shall not have
any ability to enforce other lease provisions. Provided that Developer complies with the preceding
sentence in this Section 11(A), Developer shall not be in default of this Agreement if a tenant fails
to cause City to be designated as a point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in that
tenant’s operations. Except as set forth in this Section 11(A), City shall not have the ability to
otherwise impact the viability or effectiveness of any tenant lease.
B. Baker House Improvements. Developer shall rehabilitate Baker House in
compliance with the United States Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties, and shall construct a visitor parking area, landscaping and hardscape improvements
(collectively, “Baker House Improvements”) in compliance with the approved Certificate of
Appropriateness DRC2019-00854 and the site plan and specifications attached as Exhibit “C” to
this Agreement (“Baker House Site Plan”). The Baker House Improvements shall be located on an
approximately 0.99-acre portion of the Project site as generally depicted in the Baker House Site
Plan (the “Baker House Site”). The Baker House Improvements shall be comprised of two
components: (i) the shell building improvements consisting of renovating the existing Baker
House structure (the “Baker House Shell Improvements”), and (ii) all improvements outside the
existing Baker House structure (the “Baker House Site Improvements”). The total budget for the
Baker House Shell Improvements and the Baker House Site Improvements is Two Million Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000) (the “Total Cost”).
i. Following the Effective Date, Developer is to promptly prepare and submit
to the City construction drawings in substantial conformance with the Baker House Site Plan (the
“Baker House Construction Drawings”) for plan check. City shall not unreasonably delay acting
on the Baker House Construction Drawings that are consistent with the Baker House Site Plan and
all applicable building codes. Upon City’s approval of the Baker House Construction Drawings
and confirmation that Baker House Construction Drawings are ready for permit issuance, such
drawings shall be deemed the “Approved Baker House Construction Drawings.”
-8-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
ii. If prior to or during Developer’s construction of the Baker House
Improvements pursuant to subsection iii below, a natural disaster or other natural forces (e.g.
earthquake, fire, or flooding) renders construction of the Baker House Shell Improvements
infeasible, then Developer may exercise one of the following options, as applicable:
a. If the Baker House is entirely destroyed due to the natural disaster,
then Developer shall reconstruct a new, stick-frame structure or equivalent of less than or equal to
the size of the Baker House, and provide a monument commemorating the historical significance
of the Baker House in accordance with mitigation measure CUL-3 in the MMRP. In lieu of a new,
stick frame structure, the City can authorize in writing an alternative means of compliance.
b. In compliance with all related and applicable historic resource and
environmental laws, the City can deem the Baker House uninhabitable and require it to be
demolished if it is partially damaged or destroyed. Developer shall reconstruct a new, stick-frame
structure or equivalent of less than or equal to the size of the Baker House, and provide a monument
commemorating the historical significance of the Baker House in accordance with mitigation
measure CUL-3 in the MMRP. In lieu of a new, stick frame structure, the City can authorize in
writing an alternative means of compliance.
iii. In accordance with the EIR’s mitigation measures, Developer shall
complete the Baker House Improvements in accordance with the Approved Baker House
Construction Drawings and the terms specified in this Section 11(B). Developer shall select a
general contractor who shall obtain competitive bids from at least three (3) licensed and insured
subcontractors designated by Developer for each major trade component of the Baker House
Improvements with a scope of work over twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (“Major Trade
Component”). Developer shall provide the City with copies of all of such Major Trade Component
bids, and Developer shall adjust inconsistent or incorrect assumptions so that a like-kind
comparison can be made. Developer shall select in good faith the applicable subcontractor for
each Major Trade Component that provides the lowest qualified bid and who agrees to meet
Developer's construction schedule for each of the applicable components of the Baker House
Improvements.
a. If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Improvements
is less than or equal to the Total Cost, then Developer shall complete all Baker House
Improvements.
b. If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Shell
Improvements is, on its own, equal to or greater than the Total Cost, then Developer shall complete
the Baker House Shell Improvements and have no further obligation to complete the Baker House
Site Improvements. For the avoidance of doubt, Developer shall be required to pay for any cost
overage associated with the Baker House Shell Improvements, and, upon completion, City shall
deem Developer’s obligations with respect to the Baker House complete regardless of the Site’s
compliance with regulations from the Americans with Disabilities Act, parking requirements, or
other development standards. Developer shall not be liable for any defects related to the Baker
House Site Improvements.
-9-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
c. If the total for all work to complete the Baker House Shell
Improvements is less than the Total Cost, but the combined price for all Baker House
Improvements exceeds the Total Cost, then City shall either (i) reduce the proposed scope for the
Baker House Site Improvements to result in a total bid price of less than or equal to the Total Cost
for the Baker House Improvements, or (ii) direct Developer to contribute the difference between
the Total Cost and the price for the Baker House Shell Improvements as a community benefit
payment to be paid to City prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project.
iv. During construction of the Baker House Improvements, the City-appointed
building inspectors shall not unreasonably delay construction or add new scopes of work beyond
what is consistent with the approved Baker House Construction Drawings, excepting life safety
items or items required by technical codes applicable to the construction of the Baker House
Improvements.
v. Upon completion of the actions set forth in Sections (11)(B)(i)-(iv),
Developer shall have no further obligations of any kind with respect to Baker House or the Baker
House Improvements, and the City shall be solely responsible for any future improvements,
programming, maintenance, or public use of the site. Developer shall also dedicate to the City by
grant deed fee title to the Baker House Site upon completion of the actions set forth in
Sections (11)(B)(i)-(iv).
vi. City shall not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for any building within the
Project until Developer has completed the Baker House Improvements in accordance with the
Approved Baker House Construction Drawings, and obtained City acceptance thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, completion of the rehabilitation of Baker House and completion
of the Baker House Improvements shall satisfy all but one hundred fifty thousand dollars
($150,000.00) of Developer’s public art requirements under Chapter 17.124 of the City Municipal
Code and the Public Art in Lieu Fee, which may be satisfied either through the procurement of art
or payment of an in-lieu fee.
C. Sidewalk, Trees, and Traffic Calming Improvements. Developer shall pay one
million seventy thousand dollars ($1,070,000.00) as an in-lieu fee to City and contribution toward
Sidewalks, Trees, and Traffic Calming improvements. The fee required pursuant to this
Section 11(C) shall be due upon the issuance of the first building permit for the Project.
Developer’s contribution to the City for Sidewalks, Trees, and Traffic Calming improvements will
satisfy any Condition of Approval, obligations/requirements in this Agreement,
obligations/requirements in this Agreement, and any future obligations pertaining to Sidewalks,
Trees, or Traffic Calming improvements.
D. Traffic Improvements. Developer shall construct and take other action related to
traffic improvements as required by the Project Entitlements. Developer shall submit off-site plans
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for each of the improvements identified below, as
applicable, consistent with the City’s standard off-site plan check review process required for
issuance of an offsite encroachment permit(s).
i. Traffic improvements as required by the Project Entitlements shall be
completed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, no later than by issuance of the Certificate of
-10-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Occupancy of the Project’s first building. However in the event that Developer is unable to
complete the improvements by issuance of Certificate of Occupancy despite best efforts, due to
processing, required coordination with other projects, or other issues outside of Developer’s
control, then Developer shall issue a bond for the remaining work and shall be obligated to
complete the required improvements within one year of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy
for the Project’s first building.
ii. Developer shall construct the traffic improvements consistent with the
demands outlined in the Project Entitlements.
iii. If Developer is unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary rights-of-way or
easements to construct the required traffic or storm drain improvements as required by the Project
Entitlements, including such improvements at the northwest and southwest corners of 9th Street
and Vineyard Avenue, the City shall work in good faith to assist Developer’s effort to obtain the
necessary right-of-way and easements, including by exercising the City’s eminent domain power
where applicable pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5; however, the Developer shall
first attempt good faith negotiations to acquire the adjacent property needed for the right of way.
Further:
a. With regards to the right-of-way located at northwest corner of 8th
Street & Baker Avenue, which the City owns, the City shall sell the approximately 86 square feet
of required right-of-way by the Developer to permit Developer to construct the required
improvements at the northwest corner of 8th Street & Baker Avenue for $5,000; and
b. With regards to the right-of-way located at southeast corner of 8th
Street & Baker Avenue, which is located within the City of Ontario (“Ontario”), the City will
collaborate with Ontario to allow Developer to obtain the right-of-way.
iv. Following completion of construction and approval by City, Developer
shall dedicate these required traffic improvements and storm drain main to City. Developer’s
provision of traffic improvements and storm drain main pursuant to this Section 11(D) will satisfy
any Condition of Approval and any future obligations pertaining to these required traffic
improvements and storm drain main.
E. Other City Fees. Developer is responsible for other applicable development fees,
in accordance with Section 10(B), except that Developer shall be liable for one hundred fifty
thousand dollars ($150,000.00) towards the public arts requirement, which may be satisfied by
Developer as either through the procurement of art or payment of an in-lieu fee.
F. RC Fiber. Developer shall complete construction of the improvements intended to
serve RC Fiber to the Project, as described in the Project Entitlements’ conditions of approval.
Further, Developer shall utilize, and shall cause all tenants of the Project to utilize, RC Fiber high-
speed broadband (at a minimum of one (1) Gigabits (“Gbps”) per second service) for all fiber
service within the Project’s buildings for a period of not less than 10 years from the date each lease
commences. Developer shall cause all tenant leases to include such a requirement that they will
use RC Fiber high-speed broadband (at a minimum of one (1) Gigabits (“Gbps”) per second
service) for each tenant’s fiber service during such ten year period. Provided that Developer
-11-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
complies with the preceding three (3) sentences in this Section 11 (F), Developer shall not be in
default of this Agreement if a tenant fails to obtain service from RC Fiber or does not carry out
any obligations with RC Fiber. Except as set forth in this Section 11 (F), City shall not have the
ability to otherwise impact the viability or effectiveness of any tenant lease. City shall be a third-
party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases.
Section 12. City’s Obligations. The City shall reasonably expedite review and processing of
all plans and issuance of all permits associated with the Project.
Section 13. Annual Review. During the Term of this Development Agreement, City shall
annually review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terms of this
Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual report with the City indicating
information regarding compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement by January 2 of
each year following the Effective Date of this Agreement. Annual reports shall include all
information necessary for the City to assess Developer’s compliance with the terms and provisions
of this Agreement. Developer shall have the right to cause the annual report to be filed by any
lessee then occupying the Site provided, however, that Developer shall remain primarily
responsible for such filing.
Section 14. Indemnification and Legal Challenge. To the maximum extent permitted by law,
Developer agrees to, and shall, defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers,
contractors serving as City officials, agents, and employees (“Indemnitees”) harmless from
liability for damage and/or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims
for property damage, and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or
alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer’s activities in connection with the construction
of the Project or operation of the permitted use, and which may arise from the direct or indirect
operations of Developer or those of Developer’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any
other persons acting on Developer’s behalf, which relate to the construction of the Project or
operation of the permitted use. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims for
damage, as described above, regardless of whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the
plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of any
provision of this Agreement, any of the entitlement documents pertaining to the Project including,
without limitation, the Conditional Use Permit, Design Review, Tentative Parcel Map, Certificate
of Appropriateness, EIR, or any other supporting document relating to the Project, the Developer
shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all
liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees
in relation to such action. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The parties
hereby agree to cooperate in defending such action. In the event of any litigation challenging the
effectiveness of this Agreement, or any portion hereof, this Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect while such litigation, including any appellate review, is pending, unless otherwise
ordered by the court. Absent issuance of an injunction, the Developer may elect to continue
development under this Agreement pending completion of the litigation but it shall do so at its sole
risk, and the City shall not be liable for any loss suffered as a result thereof.
-12-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 15. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part,
only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California
Government Code § 65868, et seq., or successor provisions thereto.
Section 16. Minor Amendments to Development Plan. Upon the written application of
Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development Plan, including modifications to
the building design or footprint affecting setbacks, parking layout and design, and landscape design
may be approved by the Planning Director (“Director”). Substantial changes in the Development
Plan, as determined by the Director, shall be processed through the process required by law to
amend or modify the Development Plan. Upon the approval of such changes to the Development
Plan, Developer and City shall amend this Agreement to memorialize and acknowledge the revised
Development Plan.
Section 17. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by
Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) by registered or certified
mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the
reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is served on Developer, or
if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said
breach or default cannot be cured within said thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach
or default must be commenced within said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently
pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this
Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to
specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development
Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by
Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate.
Section 18. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the
happening of one or more of the following events or conditions:
A. If a material warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Developer
to City set forth herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein is false or proved to
have been false in any material respect when it was made;
B. If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant
to Section 13 hereinabove, upon the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied
in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and
opportunity to cure as described in Section 17 hereinabove; or
C. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after
notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Section 17 hereinabove.
Section 19. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance
by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce this Agreement. Nonperformance by
Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein
contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party
or entity, other than City. Subject to the provisions of Section 20, all other remedies at law or in
equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to each party to pursue
-13-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement by the other party (subject to
applicable notice and cure periods). No waiver by City or Developer of any breach or default
under this Development Agreement by the other party shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other
subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.
Section 20. City Not Liable For Damages. It is acknowledged by the parties that the City
would not have entered into this Agreement if it could be held liable in monetary damages under
or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Consequently, and except for the
payment of attorney’s fees in accordance with this Agreement, the Developer covenants on behalf
of itself and its successors in interest not to sue for or claim any monetary damages for any breach
of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any terms to the contrary herein, Developer may institute an
action for specific performance or other legal or equitable relief to cure, correct or remedy any
default, to enforce any covenants or agreements herein, or to obtain any other remedies consistent
with the purpose and terms of this Agreement.
Section 21. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to
be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary (“Lender”)
of said encumbrance or lien shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and
the existence of said encumbrance or lien to:
A. Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, or cure any default
of Developer under this Agreement within the time limits set forth in Section 17, and any such act
or thing done or performed by Lender or cure shall be as effective as if done by Developer;
B. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising
foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the
security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter referred to as “a trust deed”);
C. Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at
any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant
to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and
D. Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale,
whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale
contained in a trust deed.
Should any Lender require or request an amendment of this Agreement in respect of the rights and
remedies granted to a Lender, City hereby agrees to execute and deliver such an amendment so
long as the proposed amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights, powers, and
remedies of the City in respect of a default by Developer hereunder.
Section 22. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this
Agreement by Developer to Lender (if known by City) simultaneously with such notice of default
City gives to Developer and afford Lender the opportunity after receipt of service of the notice to:
A. Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice, where
the default can be cured by the payment of money;
-14-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
B. Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice where
the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured
within that time; or
C. Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where
something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and cannot be
performed within thirty (30) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default
are commenced within a thirty (30) day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by
City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender.
Section 23. Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a
Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement
by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project.
The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or
for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the
encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City
for the default or breach by Developer unless:
A. They are commenced within thirty (30) days after service on Developer (and on
Lender if Lender’s address is provided to the City) of the notice described hereinabove;
B. They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required
by law to completion; and
C. Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this
Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure
proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction, or payment.
Section 24. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be
provided by certified mail at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other
such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto.
To Developer: CP Logistics Vineyard LLC
2442 Dupont Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
Attention: Jacob R. LeBlanc
CDP Development, Inc.
2442 Dupont Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
Attention: Chase Metkovich
To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Planning Director
-15-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
Section 25. Attorneys’ Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this
Development Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees incurred during
the proceeding (including appeals) as may be fixed within the discretion of the court.
Section 26. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof
shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
Section 27. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action or litigation brought
for breach or to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be the Superior Court of the County
of San Bernardino, California.
Section 28. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, or enforceability of the remaining
provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
Section 29. Recordation. Developer shall record this Agreement in the Official Records of the
County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino at Developer’s sole expense within ten (10)
business days following the Effective Date. Upon the expiration of the terms of this Agreement
and the request of the Developer, the City will execute and deliver, in recordable form, an
instrument confirming that this Agreement is terminated and of no further force or effect.
Section 30. Force Majeure. In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered
or prevented from performance of any act required hereunder by reason of acts of God, strikes,
lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, riots, insurrection, terrorism, war or other
reason of similar nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing the work or doing the acts
required under the terms of this Agreement, then the performance of such act shall be excused for
the period of the delay caused by the foregoing. Financial inability shall not be deemed an excuse
for delay under this Section 30.
Section 31. Integrated Agreement. This Development Agreement consists of this Agreement
together with all Exhibits attached hereto, and all of the same are hereby incorporated by reference.
The provisions of this Agreement shall govern over any inconsistent or conflicting provisions set
forth in the Exhibits. No representation or promise, verbal or written, not expressly set forth herein
shall be binding or have any force or effect.
Section 32. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in every provision hereof in which time
is a factor.
-16-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be
effective on the Effective Date set forth hereinabove.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a Municipal Corporation
Dated:
By:
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kim Sevy
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Nicholas R. Ghirelli
City Attorney
[Signatures continue on following page]
-17-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
DEVELOPER:
CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: CP LOGISTICS PLATFORM, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Sole Member
By: PANATTONI CLP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Administrator
By: PANATTONI CLP OPERATOR, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Manager
By: _________________________________
William Bullen,
Vice President
CP LOGISTICS VINEYARD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: CP LOGISTICS PLATFORM, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Sole Member
By: PANATTONI CLP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Administrator
By: PANATTONI CLP OPERATOR, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its Manager
By: _________________________________
Chase Metkovich,
Vice President
-18-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of Colorado )
County of Denver )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of Colorado that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
-19-
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of Orange )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
County of San Bernardino )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
1 10.9.19
9th & Vineyard
Legal Description
That certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
and is described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 31 LYING NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
RAILROAD COMPANY, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND
MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,
PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET THEREOF.
APN: 0207-271-25
PARCEL 2:
THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 25, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25 ON THE SOUTH LINE OF 9TH STREET,
60 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTH 305 FEET; THENCE EAST 108 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 125 FEET; THENCE EAST 123 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 FEET TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID 9TH STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF 9TH STREET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPT THE INTEREST IN THE NORTH 33 FEET OF SAID LOT 25 AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1958, IN BOOK 4638
PAGE 277, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN BOOK 809 PAGE 195, OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-27
PARCEL 3:
PARCEL NO. 3 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST,
SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4
OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WEST OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT
2 10.9.19
CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED
NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, AS CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN
BOOK 809, PAGE 195, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1979, IN BOOK 9632, PAGE 663, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID LOT 25
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 45' 40" EAST 55.50 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 222.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 39' 31"
EAST 123.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 43.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45" EAST
371.43 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED
DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-94
PARCEL 4:
LOT 1 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 700 FOR LOT MERGER, AS EVIDENCED BY
DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0300680 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT LAND IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1998-
0190862 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH THAT LAND IN SAID CITY,
COUNTY AND STATE DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO.
1998-0190863 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED
RECORDED MAY 19, 1998 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1998-0190862, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF
NINTH STREET, 30.00 FEET IN HALF WIDTH, THENCE SOUTH 305 FEET; THENCE EAST 108
FEET; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET; THENCE EAST 123 FEET; THENCE NORTH 180 FEET TO
SAID SOUTH LINE OF NINTH STREET; THENCE WEST 231 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
APN: 0207-271-97
PARCEL 5:
PARCEL 5A:
THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT
31, LYING NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY,
3 10.9.19
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,
PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 0207-271-39
PARCEL 5B:
THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF LOT 31, SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,
RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 150 FEET, OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET.
APN: 0207-271-40
PARCEL 6:
PARCEL 11 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16141, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 215 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES
85 THROUGH 87 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 0207-271-89
PARCEL 7:
PARCEL NO. 2 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32 AND THE WEST LINE
OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 32; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 102.56 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST 433.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 8.30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST 213.03 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 32.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, BY DEED
RECORDED JANUARY 19, 1987, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 87-016234, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 25, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE
7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF
4 10.9.19
MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WEST OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT CONVEYED TO
THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND
RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, AS CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 9, 1932, IN
BOOK 809, PAGE195, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1979, IN BOOK 9632, PAGE 663, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID LOT 25
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 89° 45’ 40" EAST 55.50 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 222.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 39’ 31"
EAST 123.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13’ 15" WEST 43.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46’ 45" EAST
371.43 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1943, AND RECORDED
DECEMBER 02, 1943, IN BOOK 1642, PAGE 319, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
APN: 0207-271-96
PARCEL 8:
PARCEL NO. 1 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 672 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS
EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0285832 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE ACHISON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY (100 FEET WIDE).
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32 AND THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST HALF OF LOT 32; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 102.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45"
EAST 433.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 13' 15" WEST 8.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 46' 45" EAST
213.03 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 32.
APN: 0207-271-93
Exhibit A-2
Exhibit - B
Baker Avenue Community Center - Conceptual Design Package
8803 Baker Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga 91730
Date: 12/05/2024
2
SHIPPING CONTAINER VILLAGE - SITE PLAN UPDATE
PARKING SPACES - 14 TOTAL
12 STD SPACES
2 ACCESSIBLE SPACES
COVERED OUTDOOR
EVENT SPACE
2000 SF
PLAYGROUND
OPEN SPACEKITCHEN
160 SF
RESTROOMS
160 SF
MURAL
MURAL
OFFICE
80 SF STORAGE
80 SFTRASH
ENCLOSURE
GREAT ROOM
1068 SF
DROP-OFF
(ACCESSBLE)
PARK MEADOW
COVERED WALKWAY
NORTH
PORCH HISTORIC
ENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
RAMP
NEW WAREHOUSE BUILDING
BAKER AVE
FIRELANE
0’32’64’128’
CMU SCREEN WALL
CM
U
S
C
R
E
E
N
W
A
L
L
CM
U
S
C
R
E
E
N
W
A
L
L
MURAL
MURAL
PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJECT BOUNDARY
PR
O
J
E
C
T
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
Exhibit C
11231-0267\3136111v15.doc
EXHIBIT D
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Fees shall include and be limited to the following:
City-Wide Systems Fees for Transportation Development – South Zone (Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Chapter 3.28)
Police Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 3.64)
Fire Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 3.80)
Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter
3.76)
Panattoni 9th and Vineyard Project
Primary Case File No: DRC2019 -00742
December 17, 2025
PROJECT BACKGROUND
DRC2019-00742 2
•Who : CP Logistics Vineyard, LLC;
•What : A request for entitlements to
subdivide parcels and construct three new
industrial buildings and rehab historic
Baker House;
•Where : 45.96 acres bounded by 9th Street,
Vineyard Avenue, BNSF/Metrolink, and
Baker Avenue;
•When :
•Accepted on September 23, 2019;
•Deemed Complete on June 16, 2021;
•Planning Commission recommended
approval on November 12, 2025
Project Site and Background
9267 Haven Avenue
(To be renovated)
9227 Haven Avenue
(To be demolished)
North from 6th StreetView of 9th Street facing EastView of 8th and Baker looking Northeast
Panorama facing East from Baker Avenue
PROJECT SITE
Northwest from 6th Street and Utica Avenue
View of Baker House Facing East
9267 Haven Avenue
(To be renovated)
9227 Haven Avenue
(To be demolished)
North from 6th StreetView of 9th Street facing East
Proposed Project
Project :
•Proposal to construct
DRC2023-00067 11
PROPOSED PROJECT
Project :
•Proposal to construct
DRC2023-00067 11
PROPOSED PROJECT
DRC2023-00067 11
ARCHITECTURE
Design Review
•Required to allow construction of
proposed project;
Tentative Parcel Map
•To consolidate project site into 4 lots;
Conditional Use Permit
•To permit requested uses
•Wholesale Distribution -Medium;
•Distribution/ Fulfillment Center, Large;
•E-Commerce Distribution
•Storage Warehouse
•Manufacturing, Light-La r g e
ENTITLEMENTS REQUIRED
Development Agreement
•To establish certainty in development
process for developer and benefits to
the City;
Certificate of Appropriateness
•To allow rehabilitation of Baker House
Important note
The Project application previously included additional
entitlements, including a Uniform Sign Program. Prior to the
public hearing, staff and the applicant agreed that the USP was
not necessary at this time and will rather be a condition of
approval. This action has no impact to overall project scope,
design or operational characteristics.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
•Term Length: eight years, with an option for an additional two years
upon payment by developer of $1 million;
•A requirement for future tenants to designate Rancho Cucamonga as the
“point of sale” for material handling equipment in project operation;
•Developer to commit $2.5 Million to rehabilitate the Baker House and
improve to tenant “shell.” Baker House property to be dedicated to the
City for future use and developer to provide additional $150,000 in
public art;
Baker House
•Designated Historic Landmark (2014),
Certificate of Appropriateness required to allow
rehabilitation
•Developer proposes to rehabilitate structure,
subdivide and improve property after which
property to be dedicated to the City;
•The Fire, Engineering and Building
Departments have also reviewed the
project and have provided conditions
of approval included with this staff
report;
•Various traffic improvements required
•Signal Optimization;
•New signal at 8 th and Baker;
•Voluntary improvements to 9 th and
Vineya rd.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
Neighborhood Meetings
•Two neighborhood meeting held on April 22, 2022 and August 8, 2024;
•Concerns included traffic, truck circulation, privacy walls, fiber optic
•Applicant revised plans to prohibit truck access on Baker Ave and limit
truck access on 9 th Street;
Design Review Committee (DRC)
•DRC held meeting on December 17, 2024.
•Comments included thoughts on truck circulation;
•A condition of approval added to require additional on-site queueing.
Previous Meetings
•Per State CEQA Guidelines, An EIR was prepared
for this project (SCH2019110456);
•EIR published in 2022, recirculated in 2024.
Environmental documentation included with this staff
report for reference (Exhibit C);
•Project results in significant and unavoidable impac
for noise and proximity to residential uses;
•Statement of Overriding Considerations has been
prepared for Council consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
•As required by law, this public hearing was
advertised on October 28 and 29, 2025;
•Prior to publishing report, staff received two
comments which have been included and
responded to in report;
•To date, staff has received two additional
inquiries:
•Email received today from resident
•Support letter from Western Carpenters
NOTICING
RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and Planning Commission recommend
that the Council approve Resolution 2025 -101
and Ordinance 1052 as amended, approving
the project and certifying the EIR, subject to the
Conditions of Approval.
2025-12-17 – Regular CCM – Correspondence Received after close of business day
-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda Alvarenga <brendayalvarenga@icloud.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2025 6:32 PM
To: Planning, City <City.Planning@cityofrc.us>
Cc: Joseph Blanco <iblanco2079@gmail.com>; Mama In Law Blanco <antoinetteblanco@icloud.com>;
Marlene Blanco <marleneblanco00@gmail.com>
Subject: Opposition to CP Logistics Vineyard Project – December 17, 2025 Hearing
[You don't often get email from brendayalvarenga@icloud.com. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am writing to formally oppose the CP Logistics Vineyard industrial project scheduled for consideration
at the December 17, 2025 City Council meeting.
This development will significantly increase truck traffic, noise, and diesel emissions, negatively
impacting public safety, air quality, and quality of life for nearby residents, especially families and
children. Increased congestion and heavy truck activity pose clear safety risks to pedestrians, cyclists,
and local neighborhoods.
I urge the City Council to reconsider this project and instead prioritize family-centered uses such as
parks, green space, bike trails, or recreational areas that better serve the community and protect public
health.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Brenda Alvarenga
Ismael Joseph Blanco
Antoinette Blanco
Marlene Blanco
Edwin St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
DATE:December 17, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
Tanya Spiegel, Deputy Director of Economic Development
Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT:Receive and File an Oral Presentation by the Etiwanda Historical Society
of Its Annual Report of Events, Fundraising, Membership, and Outreach
Activities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file an oral presentation by the Etiwanda Historical Society of Its Annual Report of
Events, Fundraising, Membership, and Outreach Activities
BACKGROUND:
The City owns the historic Chaffey-Garcia Home (7150 Etiwanda Avenue) and the Chaffey-Isle
Home (7086 Etiwanda Avenue) and on November 6, 2013, the City entered into a lease
agreement with the Etiwanda Historical Society (EHS) for the preservation and restoration of
these historic properties. Since the execution of the initial lease term, EHS has continued to serve
as the tenant and operate in accordance with the terms of the agreement. EHS primarily utilizes
the properties for museum purposes and to offer programs and services that support its mission
as a historical society. In addition, EHS may use the properties for incidental activities related to
museum operations, including fundraising and special events such as weddings, private
functions, and other commercial activities.
ANALYSIS:
In accordance with the lease agreement, EHS is required to provide the City Council with an
annual report summarizing its activities and accomplishments for the preceding year. This report
may include descriptions of events held at the premises, fundraising activities, and any
improvements made to the properties.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
While the oral presentation from EHS does not meet a specific goal of the City Council, the lease
agreements between the City and EHS meet the Council’s core values of providing and nurturing
an excellent quality of life for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 563