Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-060 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 95-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1995/96 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement ofail or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work: SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of Assessment Districts: SECTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No., 6", "Map of Street Resolution No. 95-060 Page 2 Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govem for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer: SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING: SECTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. WEDNESDAY MAY 3, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways code of the State of California. Resolution No. 95-060 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention: SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 1995. Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Gutierrez, Williams None None AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alex~der, Mayor am , City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of April, 1995. Executed this 20th day of April, 1995, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. City Clerk Resolution No. 95-060 Page 4 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 5 Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipate to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: Resolution No. 95-060 Page 6 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $17,200.00 $60,000.00 $4,680.00 $269.780.00 $351,660.00 $121,180.00 $14.339.00 $139,519.00 $487,179.00 <$52.969.00> $434.210.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended to be increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. This is the same rate as FY 94/95. following itemizes the assesssment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 1,393.04 $17.77 2 $35.54 $49,508.00 Single Family Parcel 16,037.00 $17.77 1 $17.77 $284,977.00 Multi-Family Unit 5,612 $17.77 1 $17.77 $99.725.00 Total $434~210.00 The Resolution No. 95-060 Page 7 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION FOR FY 95/96 February 16, 1994 PM 14331 25.04 AC 50.08 A.U. March 2, 1994 DR 92-11 1 DU 1.00 A.U June 15, 1994 MDR94-03 2.65 AC 5.30 A.U July 20, 1994 CUP 93-17 1.02 AC 2.04 A.U September 21, 1994 DR 93-20 2.98 AC 5.96 A.U. November 2, 1994 DR 94-03 3.87 AC 7.74 A.U. November 2, 1994 DR 94-04 88 DU 88.00 A.U. November 16, ' 1994 PM 12877 2 DU 2.00 A.U December 7, 1994 CUP 93-04 3.57 DU 7.14 A.U December 7, 1994 MDR 94-21 22.09AC 44.18 A.U December 21, 1994 DR 94-06 18.66 AC 37.32 A.U January 4, 1995 CLIP 94-16 2.15 AC 4.3 A.U March 1, ' 1995 PM 14635 7.38 AC 14.76 A.U March 15, 1995 PM 14647 353.35 AC706.7 A.U Resolution No. 95-060 Page 8 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 9 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 10 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 .--..CITY OF IIANC:I, IO CUC, AIdONGA OOUNTY Of BAN BERN~ STATE OF CALFORNIA "~'~-"~'// Resolution No. 95-060 Page 11 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 P.M. NO. 9898 P.M.B. 109/41-..43 CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA /.~£ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 12 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 313 STREET LIGHTING MAINTEHANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AHD 6 TAA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' Resolution No. 95-060 Page 13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 AF'N ,?.07-144-~0 N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r)R ?3-zo Resolution No. 95-060 Page 14 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 [~JqITA D{tIVE ~ ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIERRA VISTA BAPTIST CHURCH DR 94-03 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 15 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 PROJECT' 'c ~.T S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA1)1~. ~'~-0¥ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 16 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~' ,d 7'H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 17 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET lIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' Resolution No. 95-060 Page 18 VICINITYMAP -r Z ~Y / ~ 210-071-97 APN 0-071 o41 STREET CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA c u Resolution No. 95-060 Page 19 0 - "TP--.ees 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF _ ANCH0 CUCAMONGA N ~ MDR 94-'21 Tn~ORDERINGANNEXATIC~ ENGINEE/U~G DlVLSION ~x-,~,TT:. ~s~ssr,z~ oz~ ~ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 20 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 21 Ab,~ESSMENT DIAGRA,d LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 // A.T. & S.F. RiP. (METROLINK) STREET PROJECT SITE 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE APN 229-283-12 FOURTH STI~I~I' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA CUP 9~.16 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 22 EXHiBiT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 .... '~ .............L~ ...... '-'. '~-- /"f -.~- / .... ,.' ,,,-, ,,,,,*,.' -~ I " _~i ,-<.--, ...........~, ' '"'""*'"' ' ' Io I ; · :' . i *' , ~. !-'-~..,_,_._., '%W /.P~~ . I. ~. .' .'",,..~,/.";'- .; · i,, · ,.' , ' :. ~ ~ ; · :'~ I ~ , '. " ,-- * · lid'' . . . ~.'~.; , .. ~ ...... I "'.' I Ud .'. .... ~=:--- '/'~, · · N , _ ,k.., . r-'/l~lK, ~ .:; ,...~ , i ~- ~ ~ "~ .. ./ ..................... ../.:~&-; /; ................/. .~'- ' ~... --.. ,__ /.,Ir~ilp./...,--...~.~r~ -. ~ ' ,IF." T .... *,',,,',~'- =/.1%,;/_'"'_-~"'.-~-"~-~"" -,,,;"--. "; ~: ."~1 I i I . . ' . . _ [-e. 'l .... "~ .... . t*p'"-./'4,~·_ ,,GI ex"~'~ : ' ,. ~.. i ' . z-...-..~_'. _ ' -'~ ;'. '%"'.'~/ "'~ · ~:' · 0~"' '. ' ' ~, j,' . · · ..,~.,...e-. e~' :,,.-.,~ I . '~ ', '.""X', ,;' · ........ · .': \~,' ~ ..,-"~' ,,..,,.e,' ..,,,..,..h ,.:~' :e. ~.:~'.<?,: -:.,,~ .......... N.~S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 23 PROJECT: APN 209-272-01,04,07 AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11,17,37,38 AND39;AND , 210-361-01 THRU 26 1 ....I ·mm ----' NOT A , LA_nL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P.M. NO. 14647 G.r). CO[.F COURSE r)~.VE.I .OPMENT Resolution No. 95-060 Page 24 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 25 Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipate to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Resolution No. 95-060 Page 26 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0 $0 $0 $2,54O.00 $206.030.00 $208,570.00 $47,760.00 $21.230.00 $68,990.00 $277,560.00 <$24,990.00> $252.570.00 Analvsis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended to be increased over FY 94/95 rates. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. This is the same rate as FY 94/95. The following itemizes the assesssment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rate Fi~ct0r A,U, Revenue Commercial Acre 11.55 $39.97 2 $79.94 $920.00 Single Family Parcel 5377.00 $39.97 1 $39.97 $214,918.00 Multi-Family Unit 919 $39.97 1 $39.97 $36.732.00 Total $252.570.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 27 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 28 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 March 2, 1994 DR 92-11 1DU-1AU November 16, 1994 PM12877 2DU-2AU Resolution No. 95-060 Page 29 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENAHCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAIHTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 .-,....01TY 011 RANCHO . ' "~'~COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDmO Resolution No. 95-060 Page 30 EXHIBIT · A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 31 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 32 Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of !~72. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Resolution No. 95-060 Page 33 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,810.00 $146,660.00 $148,470.00 $34,590.00 $4.308.00 $38,898.00 $187,368.00 $4,942.00 $192,310.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 have not been increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per asssessment unit is $47.15. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: this is the same rate as FY 94/95. The Unit No. of Unit Land Use Type Uni~ Rate F~C~;or Commercial Acre 95.86 $47.15 2 Single Family Parcel 3763.00 $47.15 1 Multi-Family Unit 124 $47.15 1 Total Rat~ A.U. Revenue $94.30 $9,040.00 $47.15 $177,424.00 $47.15 $5,846.00 $192.310.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 34 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 35 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Resolution No. 95-060 Page 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development pro. ject's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD g4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency Resolution No. 95-060 Page 37 tax payments xvhich is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~4 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel '. Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency $0.00 $0.00 $108,600.00 $1,780.00 $49.890.00 $160,270.00 Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 94/95 Carryover $87,105.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $19,140.00 $2.O95.0O $21,235.00 $181,505.00 $94,400.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 will remain at $28.96 per year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $28.96. This is the same as the rate for FY 94/95. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units R~te Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 147.33 $28.96 2 $57.92 $8,533.00 Single Family Parcel 1660.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $48,074.00 Multi-Family Unit 2610 $28.96 1 $28.96 $37.793.00 Total $9_4,400.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 38 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 39 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 4 ANNEXATION FOR FY 95/96 FEBRUARY 16, 1994 PM 14331 25.04AC 50.08 AU Resolution No. 95-060 Page 40 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 IllHi l · .CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~/f'//')(~"?/ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 45 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF-RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 46 Fiscal Year95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refimdable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. Funds carded over from the 94/95 Fiscal Year will allow the district to install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. Resolution No. 95-060 Page 47 A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Capital Expenditures: Street Light Installation Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 94/95 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $4,380.00 $1,620.00 $12,780.00 $17,350.00 $670.00 $0.00 $27.330.00 $64,130.00 $9,330.00 $640.00 $9,970.00 $74,100.00 <$33.580.00> $40,520,00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget and no new assessment units have been annexed into the district. It is recommended the asssessment rates for FY 95/96 not be increased. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. This is the same as the rate for FY 94/95. The following itemizes the asssessment rate for the district: U~t No. of Unit KatW Land Use Type Units Kate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Fami~ Parcel 1.171.00 $34.60 1 $34.60 $40.520.00 Total 1,171.00 .$40.520.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 48 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 49 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIALSUSTC) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 50 Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bac!~round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $33,000. A tax delinquency mount is added to arrive Resolution No. 95-060 Page 51 at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Maintenance & Operations Subtotal: $6,560.00 $2,430.00 $2,500.00 $13,810.00 $570.00 $33.980.00 $59,850.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $6,400.00 $2.058.00 $8,458.00 Total Revenue Required: $68,308.00 Less: FY 94/95 Carryover <$9.558.00> Assessment Revenue Required: $58,75o.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended to increase. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the recommended rte per assessment unit is $51.40. This is the same as the rate of FY 94/95. The following itemizes the assessmere rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A,U. Revenue Indstrial/Comm. Acre 1143.05 $51.40 1 $51.40 $58.750.00 Total $58,750.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 52 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 53 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #6 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 June 15, 1994 IV[DR 94-03 2.65 A.U. July 20, 1994 CUP 93-17 1.02 A.U. Sept. 21, 1994 DR. 93-20 2.99 A.U. Nov. 2, 1994 DR 94-03 3.87 A.U. Nov 2, 1994 CUP 94-03 4.23 A.U. Dec. 7, 1994 CUP 93-04 3.57 A.U. Dec 7, 1994 MDR 94-12 22.09A. U. Dec. 21, 1994 DR 94-06 18.66 A.U. Jan. 4, 1995 CUP 94-16 2.15 A.U. March 1, 1995 PM 14635 7.38 A.U.' March 15, 1995 PM 14647 353.35 A.U. Resolution No. 95-060 Page 54 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 i~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 P.M. NO. 9898 ~ P.M.B. 109./41-.4.3 CITY OF RANCHO CI, I~AMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 95-060 Page 55 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA e~, Resolution No. 95-060 Page 56 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 -',, f APN £09-1't"1.-~0 N.T.£. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r~R ?a-Zo Resolution No. 95-060 Page 57 E X HIBI T · A ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SIERRA VISTA BAPTIST CHL~RCH STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~-o~ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 58 EXHIBIT 'A* ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 -. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~'U~ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 59 VICINITY MAP ~T~ ~ 210-07~-37 STREET CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA c u P N~ 93 -04 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 60 O O 0 0 0 ? CITY OF .... .~NCH0 CUCAMONGA 94:21 N Ei~IG~ING DIVISION Resolution No. 95-060 Page 61 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~' 9~-OG Resolution No. 95-060 Page 62 AbSESSMENT DIAGRA,,,I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 5 // A.T. & S.F. R/R (METROLI/qK) STREET PROJECT SITE 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE APN 229-2113-12 FOURTH CITY OF RANC~HO OU~,AMON(IA · COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,N.T.$. CUP 94-16 I Resolution No. 95-060 Page 63 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO~S. 1 AND S .. 0111 OF RANCHO OIJOAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO i STATE OF CALIFORNIAPH VICINITY lVlAP Resolution No. 95-060 Page 64 PROJECT: APN 209-272-01,04,07 AND 08; 210-0111-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11,17,37,38 AND 39; AND , 210-361-01 THRU 26 .l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P.M. NO. 14647 G.I'). C,O!.F COUR,~I::. r)g7~tg.!.OP~ Resolution No. 95-060 Page 65 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Eftwanda) Resolution No. 95-060 Page 66 Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). BackI, round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area ef the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company% rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax Resolution No. 95-060 Page 67 payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Regular Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Street Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $4,380.00 $1,620.00 $200.00 $15,410.00 $320.00 $11,770.00 $33,700.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $4,840.00 $649.00 $5,489.00 Total Revenue Required: $39,189.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover <$18.599.00> Assessment Revenue Required: $20,590.00 The Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 95/96 are not recommended in increase. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 94/95 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 618.00 $33.32 1 $33.32 $20,590.00 Total 618.00 $20.590.00 Resolution No. 95-060 page 68 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 69 Preliminary ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Fiscal Year 1995/96 Approved: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Resolution No. 95-060 Page 70 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 95/96 The FY 95/96 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southem Califomia Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000 and $8,100 for street light inventory. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a Resolution No. 95-060 Page 71 projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 95/96 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1995/96 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Sen, ices Street Light Inventory General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: $0.00 $130.00 $8,110.00 $130.00 $3.860.00 $12,230.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $710.00 $190.00 $900.00 Total Revenue Required: $13,130.00 Less: 94/95 District Carryover $6.150.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $6,~80.00 Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 95/96 not be increased. No new units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 95/96 Assessment Rate: For FY 95/96 the rate per assessment unit is $193.75. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 94/95. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A,I,I, Revenue Single Family Parcel 36,00 $193.75 1 $193.75 $6.980.00 Total 36.00 $6.980.00 Resolution No. 95-060 Page 72 -I