HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-108 - ResolutionsRESOLUTIC~NO. 94-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOL~qCIL OF ~E CITY OF RANC~0
CUCAMONC4%, CALIF-~qIA, TO LEVY A~) COTX~rT ~
~ SI~EET LI6~I~G MA/NT~qANC~ DISIRICT NOS.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7 AND 8 ~ TO ~E ~ AND
LI6~TINGACTOF 1972
~REAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho (1¥'~.~3~ did on the
4th day of May, 1994, adopt its Resolution of ~on No. 94-086 to orde__~-~
Districts Noe. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 whic~ Resolution of ~ion No. 94-086
law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of ~ion on
file in the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, any new street lights in areas to be ma~ by the
District, will beccm~ part of the active work program at such time as these
new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the
dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient n~%-refundable
deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will Ufovide
for costs of energizing and six months of c~dinary and usual maint~nace,
operation and servicing of the Street lights in each develosm~nt at the time
of initial operation of the lighting system. The oosts will be based on the
number and type of street lights and based on Southern Califcxnia ~
Ccmpany's rate for street lights. ~ately upon energization of the street
lights, those street lights will become a part of the w~rk p~x~uu of the
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered
evidenoe, oral and documentary, conce~ the jurisdiction facts in this
proceeding and oc~oex~J~ the necessity for the contemplation work and the
benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Oouncil having now acqu/red
NOW, THEREFORE, theCity Council of theCityof~O~m~ngadoes
bareby resolve as follows:
S~2TION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the
levy and oollection of e.~e~ents within the Street Lighting Maintenanoe
Districts Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1994/95, and said City
Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said
Resolution of Intention No. 94-086, be done ar~ made; and
S~L~fION 2: Be it further resolved that the re~ort filed by the
~gir~_r is hereby finally approved; and
~esolution No. 94-108
S~CIT~N 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1994/95 ~ethod of ~-~e~nt in the Er~i~eer's Re~x~ are hereby
P~, APPROVe), and ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1994.
Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Williams
~ D~_,~ra J. A~ams, Cify Cl~tk '
I, DE~RAJ. ADAMS, CITY ~.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
adopted by the City (ka~cil of the City of Rancho O~a~nga, California, at a
regular meeting of said City Councilheldc~the lstday of June, 1994·
Executed this 2rid day of June, 1994, at Rancho~r~, California.
· Adams, City Clerk
Resoluti~ No. 94-108
p~3
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. I
(Arterial Streets)
Fiscal Year 1994 / 95
William J. O N~C~y Engin~r
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1
(Arterial Streets)
Resoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page4
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared
in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and
Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Bacl<~-ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City.
The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to
benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the
maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals
on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the
City.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable
deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of
energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the
street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The
costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California
Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights,
those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue
Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments
which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs
to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows:
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Sigma[ Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$0.(.)0
$17,200.00
$1,000.00
$ 4,120.00
$269.780.00
$292,100.iX)
$123,790.00
$56.870.00
$180,660.t~)
$472,760.00
<$41,080.00>
$431,680.00
Analysis:
Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased. 22.37 new assessment units have been
annexed into the district.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. That is the same rate as FY 93/94. The
following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Commercial Acre 3769.26 $17.77 2 $35.54 $133,960.00
Single Family Parcel 16,754 $17.77 I $17.77 $297.720.00
Total $431,680.00
Resolution No. 94-108
pag. 6
· I
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
p~g~7
STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT $$1
ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
FEBRUARY 17, 1993
PM 14318 3.47 AC - 6.94AU
MARCH 17, 1993
PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU
MARCH 17, 1993
CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 20.74AU
MARCH 17, 1993
DR 92-07 1.S AC - 3.0AU
APRIL 7, 1993
PM 13800 2 DU - 2AU
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
Page8
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8
STREET lIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6'
.. CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~,~.~
Resoluti~ No. 94-108
P'd~9
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
2
3
LEG='ND --,,..-.,,--.. ,,.._
J/.~ DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIl. ~
DENOTES STREET LIGHT
SCALE~ I', 80'
...... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
· . .t STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Page ~0
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANO$CA.I= MAINTENANCi= DI$?RICT NO.
$TFIEE? LIGH?ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 31LNO 5
I
10807 JERSEY' BLVIX I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA'
COUNTY OIr SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIIrORNiA
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 11
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT E)IAGR-AM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
I~ez 4 Fir.
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMQNGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA :~~o. or
Resoluti~x~ No. 94-108
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
._.i~~~- ~CITY Oil RANOHO C)UOAMONGA
COUNTY Off SAN BERNARDINO
,,,.\~. ~ STATE OF C)ALIIfORNIA
~-~. ~ .
Resoluticx~ No. 94-108
Page ~3
AENVlRONMENTAL
HIGHTECH
ENGINEERING
~mu ~, CA
Resoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page 14
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 2
(Local Streets)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2
(Local Streets)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses
the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the
facilities in this district benefit this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic si~,mals on
local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediate, ly upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 is for electric utility charges for the
street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to
arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-108
Page 16
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: FY 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
0
0
0
$2,570.00
$206,030.(X)
$208,600.00
$50,670.00
$19.100.00
$69,770.0O
$278,370.00
<$18,500.00>
$259,860.00
Analysis:
Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 are not recommended to be increased.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. This is the same rate as FY 93/94.
following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
! and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U.
Commercial Acre 249.65 $39.97 2 $79.94
Single Family Parcel 6002.00 $39.97 1 $39.97
Total
The
Revenue
$19,960.00
$239.900.00
$259,860.O0
lqeeolutic~No. 94-108
Pacje 17
1,..
FJ d""" __. ',~ ,,,!
I~esolution No. 94-108
Pacj~ 18
STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #2
ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
MARCH 17, 1993
PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU
APRIL 7, 1993
PM 13800
2 DU- 2AU
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PM 13075 2 DU- 2AU
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 19
Ig X I'lllilT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
3
O
LEGEND --,,'--o,--,,'--
/-/,,~'~- DENOTES EOUESTRIAN TRAIL {
DENOTES STREET LIGHT'
SC~.[ I'- SO'
.~..- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA
. ~,, ~ ~i~;COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ M l l?~8
, . ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXMIBIT "A
Resoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page 2O
ASSESSMENT .DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIS'rlqlCT IIO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
/,fiR.
._~i_~'~~- ~OITY OII RANOHO ~)UP. AMONGA
OOUNTY OIIr SAN BERNARDINO
Y.~. i STATE OIIr OALIFORNIA P~/'~~ .
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 21
AENVIRONMENTAL
HIGHTECH
ENGINEERING
Sen B,m~M4i~, CA
Besoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page 22
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 3
(Victoria Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994 / 95
Approved:
l~oluticr~No. 94-108
Pac~e23
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3
(Victoria Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Bacl~round:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned
Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel,
south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the
City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals on
local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historical[y, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district.
This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY
94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as
follows:
Resolutio~ No. 94-108
Page 24
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Sibnnal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$0.00
$0.00
$1,810.00
$146,660.00
$148,470.00
$34,560.00
$8,480.00
$43,040.00
$191,510.00
<$4,630.00>
$186,880.00
Analysis:
Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $47.15. This is the same rate as FY 93/94. The
following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U, Revenue
Commercial Acre 35.29 $47.15 2 $94.30 $3,328.00
Single Family Parcel 3893.00 $47.15 1 $47.15 $183.550.00
Total $186,880.00
Resoluti(~ No. 94-108
~ 25
Resoluti(x~ No. 94-108
P'4~e 26
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J. O NIaff7, City Engineer
Resolutio~ No. 94-108
Page 27
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94/'95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned
Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south
of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the
City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is
added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows:
Resolution1 No. 94-108
Page 28
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: FY 93/94 Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$19,140.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
$840.00
$49,890.00
$ 84,870.00
$19,010.00
$3,260.00
$22,270.00
$107,140.00
<$13,510.00>
$93,630.(X)
Analysis:
Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 will remain at $28.96 per year.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $28.96. This is the same as the rate
for FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units R~te Factor A.U. Revenue
Commercial Acre 785.58 $28.96 2 $57.92 $45,500.00
Single Family Parcel 1,662.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $48.130.00
To ta I $ 93,630.00
~solutic~ No. 94-108
Pac]e 29
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 5
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
i /'e NO. 24953
Approved'/~/' L,C~-Zd~,7...k~'~ '~f~(.~
William J. 0 ~il, City Engm~r
Besoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page 31
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 5
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community.
Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan
Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that
the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. A tax delinquency amount is
added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows:
Resoluti~No. 94-108
Page 32
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994195
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Sibq~al Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: FY 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$4,080.00
$1,510.00
$12,780.00
$0.00
$490.0t)
$27,330.00
$46,190.00
$9,170.00
$26,280.00
$35,450.00
$81,640.00
<$41,120.00>
$40,520.00
Analysis:
There are no substantial increases in the district's budget and no new assessment units have been
annexed into the district. It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. This is the same as the rate for FY 93/94.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1.171.00 $34.60 1 $34.60 $40.520.00
To ta I 1,171.00 $40,520.00
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
P'cic3e 33
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 34
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 6
( Commercial / Industrial)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
Resoluti(x~ No. 94-108
Page 35
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting
Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district.
Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has
been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets
and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $33,000. A tax delinquency amount is
added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows:
Resolutio~ No. 94-108
Page 36
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Maintenance & Operations Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Less:
Total Revenue Required:
93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$8,380.00
$2,500.00
$6,580.00
$490.00
533380.00
$51,930.{.X)
$5,860.00
$7,410.00
$13,270.00
$65,200.00
< $10,460.00>
$54,740.00
Analysis:
Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommenced to increase. 15.34 new assessment units have
been annexed into the district.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $51.40. This is the same as the rate of
FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rat~ Factor A.U, Revenue
Indstrial/Comm. Acre 1064.91 $51.40 1 $51.40 $54.740.00
Total $54,740.00
Resoluti~l~ No. 94-108
P'4~3e 37
Resoluticm No. 94-108
Page 38
STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #6
ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
FEBRUARY 17, 1993
PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47AU
MARCH 17, 1993
CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37AU
MARCH 17, 1993
DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5AU
~oluti~a~ No. 94-108
Pa~e 39
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET lIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ~ND 6'
.. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~.. . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~,~,
1Resolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 40
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
L*ND$C:&PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
$TFIEE? UGH?INC MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 31 ~ND 6
I J0807 JERSEY'
$¢ALg:
-.~..~~,~, ~.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA'
~ .......~-- ,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~~; STATE OF CALIFORNIA
l~solutic~No. 94-108
Page41
~XMI~IT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMQNGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~z?c~ o,'
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 42
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
Approved:
William J. O l'~dl, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
Besolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 43
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter l, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the
North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of
Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City.
It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this
area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic si~,~nals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is
added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-108
Page 44
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Mainteoance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Sigmal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$5,590.00
$200.00
$1,370.00
$180.00
$11,770.00
$19,110.00
$4,810.00
$9,670.00
$14,480.00
$33,590.00
< $13,0t)0.00>
$20,590.00
Analysis:
Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommended to increase. No new assessment units have
been annexed into the district this year.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in this
assessment rate over the FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the
district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rate Fa~}r A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 618.00 $33.32 I $33.32 $20.590.00
To ta I 618.00 $20,590.00
Resolutic~ No. 94-108
Page 45
No. 94-10~
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J. (XN'eil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
No. 94-108
Page 47
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the
South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of
Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the
incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit
the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a
City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic
signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active
work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process
will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be
made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six
months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each
development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on
the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate
for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A tax delinquency amount is
added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax
receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-108
Page 48
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$0.00
$ ! 3O.OO
$0.00
$50.00
$3.860.00
$4,040.00
$710.00
$6,390.00
$ 7,100.00
$11,140.00
<$4.160.00>
$6,980.00
Anatysis:
It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased. No new units have been
annexed into the district this year.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $193.75. There is no increase in this assessment rate
over the FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
! and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 36.00 $193.75 1 $193.75 $6,980.00
Total 36.00 $6,980.00
l~l~cl~ l~k~. 94-10~
~ 49