HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/01/10 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY
JANUARY 10, 1996
7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Chairman Barker
Vice Chairman McNiel
Commissioner Lumpp
Commissioner Melcher
Commissioner Tolstoy
III. Announcements
IV. Approval of Minutes
November 8, 1995
V. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They
will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern
over any item, it should be removed for discussion.
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 95-04 - CHARLES AND FREDELLA GIBBONS
- A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the
Cour House, located at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-031-06. Related
files: Historic Landmark Designation 95-03.
VI. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their
opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the
Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes
per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking.
HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 95-03 CHARLES AND
FREDELLA GIBBONS - An application to designate the Cour House as a Local
Landmark, located at 7567 Eftwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-031-06. Related
files: Mills Act Agreement 95-04.
Co
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION
95-04 - E. F. MOORE & ASSOCIATES - A request to consider certain
properties located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Interstate 15,
as either Local Landmarks or Points of Interest - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09,
10, 12, 13, 17, 20, 22 through 25, 27, 29, and 32 through 35 and 227-221-01
through 03, 07 through 09, 14, and 22 through 27. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts.
VII. Public Comments
This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be
discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
VIII. Commission Business
IX. Adjournment
1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi~ that
a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 4,, 1996, at least 72 hours prior
'to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga.
VICINITY MAP
_, ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::::::::::.,.-.-.~.:.:.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::," ., :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: .'_
,.:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:.:.:::; : :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~ II'.-:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ............. '.'.'.'.'.'.-.'.'.'.-...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'......: ........... ~4i.,..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~'.-.'............ ................ '..'.'.'.-........ ............ ·
.:.:.:.: .................... .....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .........................:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.: ................. ...........:...:.:.:.: ................. ·
.J I>:.~.:.:.:.:.:..,: .....................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....:.:.:.:.:.:.: ......................:......,...:.:.:.:.:,:.:... ..........................:.:.:.:.~.: ..............
. I '~' 'i' 'i' i' 'I I 'i 'i' 'i'I I I I I I I .... '.',':';':':°:'.*':'Z'Z'[':':': ........... ~ .......... ':';',':°:':';':';'[']' ':':'~':'~., · II
i ... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:!3 ::."
I:: :'.'.'.'.'".'".'""""" ..... : ;-'.: :.:.:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:...I ...:.,
! ,':':':':':---: ..........."~I.'.-:-:-:':':':':': ......:'--~:.'.:.:-
· ~ ia ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I' :' ':"
I i:i:!i:!:!:!:i:i:!:!:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:,..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l::!::::
~ w,.. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:i:.:.:..''.'.'~."'~'"'-~'i~:~]L".~--~
~- ~.~ i':':'-~:'"~':::~ii!i!i'::i~:l~ ~ ~/ ·
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 10, 1996
Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner/Donald Granger, Intern
HISTORIC LANDMARK D!=SIGNATION 95-03 - CHARLES AND FRFDFL! A
GIBBONS - An application to designate the Cour House as a Local Landmark, located
at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-031-06. Related files: Mills Act Agreement
95-04.
MILLS ACT AGRFF:MFNT 95-04 - CHARLES AND FREDF! ! A GIBBONS - A request
to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Cour House,
located at 7567 Eftwanda Avenue - APN: 1100-031-06. Related files: Historic
Landmark Designation 95-03.
BACKGROUND
Historical Significance: Constructed in 1914 (approximate), this Dutch Colonial style home
was particularly popular between 1900 and 1930. Cheaper to construct than traditional two-
story structures, the Swedish gambrel roof architecture offers the unique combination of
maximum floor space with minimal second-story costs. The home is at least 75 years old and
is a significant architectural element of the former Etiwanda Colony Lands. The Garage
appears to be of recent modem construction and, although compatible with the historic
character, is not part of the landmark designation.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North Low Medium Residential; (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
South Office/Professional
East Office/Professional and 1-15 Freeway
West Office/Professional
General Plan Designation:
Project Site - Low Medium Residential
North Low Medium Residential
South Office
East Office/Freeway
West Office
Site Characteristics: The site is primarily fiat, with drainage flowing in a southemly direction.
The current owner is renovating the entire structure, with plans to use the dwelling as a
residence. Two structures are on the property, the house and garage, with a concrete weir
IT~ A&B
HPC STAFF REPORT
MA 95-04/LD 95-03 - GIBBONS
January 10, 1996
Page 2
situated slightly north of the house on a separate adjacent parcel. Surrounded by a few
mature trees, the house sits on a raised rock foundation. Most structural elements remain
intact, with the exception of the previous owner's removal of two rock chimneys. The
chimneys were severely damaged in the February 28, 1990, Upland earthquake.
Previous 7oning/Building Enforcement Actions: The previous property owner had completely
demolished the interior of the house and was in the process of illegally converting the
residence to an office building. For several years the house has been boarded up with a stop
work order placed on the site by the Building and Safety Department. The current owners
have done a wonderful job of making the house habitable again with new electrical, plumbing,
and mechanical systems. In addition, the present owners have installed new cabinets and
refinished the wood floors. A major portion of the roof has been replaced and window and
door repairs have commenced.
ANALYSIS:
General: As stated, the owner has commenced renovating the lot. Upgrading of the
residence is well underway; modem electrical widng has been installed and the interior has
been dry walled and painted. Modem appliances and conveniences have also been installed
(recessed lighting, shower, ceiling fans, and central air conditioning), as well as a new roof.
The owner has tentative plans to construct a matching tandem garage, and building materials
used in renovation are to be replacement in kind. It is the owner's intent to use the home as
a residence and, with the exception of the second garage, no additional structures are
planned.
Landmark Designation: The subject site and structure certainly qualify for landmark
designation based upon many of the criteda of the City Historic Preservation Ordinance. (The
Facts for Finding section substantiates landmark designation). As mentioned, the owner
plans to renovate the dwelling, amalgamating modem features with structural renovations
utilizing replacement in kind.
Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The Agreement has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference
(see Exhibit ~C" of the Agreement for the scheduled list of improvements).
The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to
protect and preserve the property so as to retain its characteristics of historical significance.
This intention is encouraged through the reduction of .property taxes, thus enabling the
property owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax for improvements.
The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual
basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property.
Staff estimates the property tax savings to the owner could be as much as $1,242 and the
reduction in tax proceeds to the City would be $35. The exact amounts are dependent on the
County Assessor's property valuation based on income potential and the capitalization rate
at the time of assessment.
Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of the
Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
HPC STAFF REPORT
MA 95-04/LD 95-03 - GIBBONS
January 10, 1996
Page 3
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once
common but is now rare.
The house is a distinct representation of Dutch Colonial architecture.
The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
The house is at least 75 years old.
Bo
Fact/s:
Finding 2:
Fact/s:
Neighborhood and Geograt:)hic Setting:
Finding 3: The proposed landmark
neighborhood.
F~ct/s:
Finding 4:
Fact/s:
materially benefits the historic character of the
The house is currently being restored and will add an aesthetic historical quality
to the neighborhood.
The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar
visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City.
The home is a familiar significant feature from the former Etiwanda Colony lands
and is located on the original construction site.
CORRESPONDENCF: This item has been advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners
within 300 feet of the project.
RFCOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the
attached Resolution recommending approval of Histodc Landmark Designation 95-04 and, by
minute action, recommend approval of the Mills Act Agreement.
ResUbmitted
BB:LH:DG:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map
Exhibit "B"- Photos
Mills Act Agreement
Resolution Recommending Approval of Landmark Designation 95-03
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
and when
RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
HISTORIC PROPERTY P~S~RVATION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
1996, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Charles and Fredella Gibbons
(hereinafter referred to as the "Owner").
WITN~ S S~TH :
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorize cities
to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to
provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so
as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance;
(ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property,
together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as
the Cour House and generally located at the street address 7567 Etiwanda Avenue,
-1-
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the
"Historic Property"). A legal description of the Historic Property is attached
hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference;
(iii) On , 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. - thereby declaring and designating
the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions
of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and,
(iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into
this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical
significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for
an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2,
of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
B. Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows:
1. Rffective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be
effective and commence on , 1996, and shall remain in effect for
a term of ten years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective
date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph
2, below.
2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of
this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall
automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of
nonrenewal is mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or City desires in any
year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice of
nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal
date of the Agreement. Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least
90 days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by City to Owner at least 60
days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to
the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest
of the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the
Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner of nonrenewal. If either City or Owner
serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain
in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original
execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.
3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this
Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions,
requirements, and restrictions:
a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of
historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as
Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those
minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the
Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this
Agreement.
b. Owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the
property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic
Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance
with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the
applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "C."
c. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior
appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by
representatives of the County Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation,
State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary to determine
Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
4. Provision of Information of Corporation. Owner hereby agrees to
furnish City with any and all information requested by the City which may be
necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of
this Agreement.
5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as
set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq., may cancel this
Agreement if it determines that Owner breached any of the conditions of this
Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no
longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also
cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner has failed to restore or
rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this
Agreement. In the event of cancellation, Owner may be subject to payment of
those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280,
et seq.
6. Rnforcement of Agreement. In lieu of and/or in addition to any
provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically
enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of
a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give
written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address
stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the
reasonable satisfaction of the City within 30 days thereafter, or if not
corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or
default if said breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that
acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within 30 days and must
thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without
further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring
any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out
of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for
injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief
as may be appropriate.
City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not
enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which
are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations
governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event
that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or
default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other
subsequent breach thereof or default hereinunder.
7. Bindin~ Effect of A~reement. The Owner hereby subjects the
Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations,
-4-
A. 61o
and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare
their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set
forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to
and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to
the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument
hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion
thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and
accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in
this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and
restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument.
City and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that
the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein
touch and concern the land in that Owner's legal interest in the Historic
Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner hereby further
declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants,
reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and
maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the Historic
Property for the benefit of the public and Owner.
8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this
Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified
below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto.
To City:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attention: City Planner
To Owner:
Charles and Fredella Gibbons
7567 Etiwanda Ave.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
-5-
9. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this
Agreement shall ~e deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and
any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or
conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint
enterprise.
b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or
claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property
damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of Owner or
those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting
on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the
Historic Property. Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its
elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all
actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of
Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. This hold harmless
provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to
have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement
regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans,
specifications or other documents for the Historic Property.
c. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and
restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal
representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the
Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever.
d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or
parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations,
or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any
party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all
reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs
and other relief ordered by the court.
-6-
e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are
held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or
by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the
remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.
f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
10. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and
enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in
the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part,
only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS W~REOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the
day and year first written above.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated: By:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Dated: By:
Owner
Dated: By:
Owner
-7-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On , JAN SUTTON, Deputy City Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared WILLIA~ J. ALEXA/~DER,
personally know to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized
capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Jan Sutton
Deputy City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On the __ day of , 199 , before me
Notary Public, personally appeared __
, personally known to me or proved
to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and the by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
the person(s) acted executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State
-8-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
for
Cour House
Charles and Fredella Gibbons
located at
7567 Etiwanda Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
Owned by Charles and Fredella Gibbons
The north 115 feet of the west 189.39 feet of the south one half of lot 12,
"Block R", Etiwanda Colony Land as shown on Book 2, page 24 of maps.
Exhibit "A"
THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS
Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a
property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or
site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its originally
intended purpose.
The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure,
or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or
alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features
should be avoided when possible.
All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of
their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek
to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.
Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the
history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its
environment.
Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which
characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with
sensitivity.
Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced,
wherever possible.
In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the
material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other
visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features
should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by
historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural
designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other
buildings or structures.
The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle
means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage
the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.
8o
Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological
resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection,
stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction
project.
Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties
shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy
significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design
is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the
property, neighborhood, or environment.
10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done
in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed
in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be
unimpaired.
Exhibit "B-l"
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other
improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the
appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are
prohibited:
1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences,
roofs, doors, walls, and windows;
2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris;
Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles,
automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or
similar items;
4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas;
5o
Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly
by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location.
EXHIBIT
POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS
for
Charles and Fredella Gibbons
7567 Etiwanda Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete.
Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this
contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission's staff.
ITeM Y~.AR TASK
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Renovate interior for habitation
Re-roof
Upgrade heating system; add air-conditioning
Repair exterior
Repaint exterior same color
Renovate lawns and add landscape improvements
Extend garage
Replace andrepaint wood siding
New walkway and driveway
New backyard gazebo
EXHIBIT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 95-03 TO DESIGNATE THE COUR
HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7567 ETIWANDA AVENUE AS A LANDMARK -
APN: 1100-031-06.
A. Recitals.
1. Chades and Fredella Gibbons have filed an application for Landmark Designation 95-03,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark
Designation is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 10, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A" of this Resolution, are true and correct.
2.~ The application applies to approximately .51 acres of land, basically a 115-foot by
189-foot "C" configuration, located at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to *this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 10, 1996, incJuding written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of
building which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s:
The house is a distinct representation of Dutch Colonial
architecture.
Finding 2:
The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its
kind.
Fact/s: The house is at least 75 years old.
B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting.
Finding 3:
The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic
character of the neighborhood.
Fact/s:
The house is currently being restored and will add an
aesthetic historical character to the neighborhood.
HPC RESOLUTION NO.
LD 95-03- GIBBONS
January 10,1996
Page 2
Finding 4:
The proposed Landmark in its location represents an
established and familiar visual feature of the
neighborhood, community, or City.
Fact/s:
The home is familiar significant feature from the former
Eftwanda Colony lands and is located on the odginal
construction site.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, as Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Class 3.e of
Article 19, Section 15308.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation 95-03.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 1996.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of January 1996, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 10,1996
Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scoff Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner
F:NVIRONM!=NTAL ASSFSSMFNT AND lANDMARK DI::SIGNATION 95-04 -
E. F. MOORE & ASSOCIATES - A request to consider certain properties located
on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Interstate 15, as either Local
Landmarks or Points of Interest - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 12, 13, 17, 20,
22 through 25, 27, 29, and 32 through 35 and 227-221-01 through 03, 07 through
09, 14, and 22 through 27.
BACKGROUND: The applicant, E. F. Moore & Associates, is considering the purchase of parcels
in the Eftwanda area to develop a shopping center. The parcels under consideration are bounded
on the south by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue, and on the northwest by
Interstate 15. VVhile all of these parcels may not be eventually developed, the applicant is trying
to determine if any of the parcels or structures within those parcels are of histodc and/or cultural
value to the City. The information obtained would then be used by the applicant in assessing the
properties' purchase value and identifying design constraints of the project.
Several of the parcels under consideration by the applicant have been previously reviewed by the
Histodc Preservation Commission. On July 12, 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission
considered a request to review the historical level of significance of the Etivista Winery and the
demolition of a portion of the facility that was constructed with unreinforced masonry. The
Commission determined that the Etivista VVinery should be designated a Point of Historic Interest.
While the winery was operated by several prominent local businessmen (Nick DiCarlo, Frank
Schiro, and Buster Filpi), the Point of Interest designation was deemed appropriate because of the
limited size and operation of the winery. This designation was affirmed by the City Council on
September 20, 1995.
ANALYSIS: In reviewing the historical significance of the sites, very little information is available
other than the information provided with the Eftvista Winery report. A few structures appear to be
built in the 1920s. The information available is summarized as follows:
Site #1: Sacred Heart Catholic Church - The first mass was celebrated at the church on
Easter Sunday, Apdl 5, 1953, out of a converted country store located on the site. Actual
church construction began in 1957 and was completed in 1958. Historically speaking, the
church structure does not meet the typical criteda for historical significance of being at least
50 years old. The church did, however, provide a place of worship and a gathering location
ITEM C
HPC STAFF REPORT
LD 95-04 - MOORE
January 10, 1995
Page 2
Go
Eo
for many of the prominent residents of the Etiwanda area. Many of the parishioners were
associated With the wineries of the area including, but not limited to, the Guidera, DiCarlo,
Schiro, and Masi families. Sacred Heart has continued to remain a prominent
establishment at it's location on Foothill Boulevard. For this reason, staff believes that the
social contributions by Sacred Heart Church were, and are, an important part of the
Etiwanda history and should be recognized. Staff feels that designation as an Historic Point
of Interest is appropriate to commemorate the contributions. In that staff is anticipating
demolition of the structures, staff is recommending placement of a plaque to commemorate
those contributions.
Site #.4: T. Ingvaldsen and Sons General Store and Home/Regina Restaurant (12892
Foothill Boulevard) - Established in 1914, the Ingvaldsen Store was one of the few stores
in the Etiwanda area. The business, located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard
and Etiwanda Avenue, supplied lumber, lime, bdcks, pipe, doors, fumishings, hardware,
hay, grain, and groceries. The rear of the site also contained the Ingvaldsen residence.
The business remained in operation until approximately 1941. At that time, the operation
and management of the store changed to a restaurant run by the John Prevello family. Don
Casalletti and Anthony Columbero took over the restaurant operations around 1945. The
exact closure date of the restaurant is not known. In the 1980s the building suffered major
fire damage. In 1991, the structures were classified as an attractive nuisance because of
unsafe conditions. The structures were later demolished. VVhile the structures are not in
place today, staff does recognize the importance of the store/restaurant in the history of
Etiwanda as a Historic Point of Interest. Therefore, staff recommends placement of a
plaque on the site to commemorate the business/structures.
Site #3:12854 Foothill Boulevard (J=tiwanda Realty)- According to the County Assessor's
information, the single story craftsman structure was built in 1918. In reviewing the
information available, however, staff does not find any references to the building. The
current owner, Michael Scadata, purchased the property in 1944. The structure is currently
used as the business office for Etiwanda Realty.
Sites #5 & 6:7938 and 7954 !=tiwanda Avenue - Based on Assessor's information the
residences at 7938 and 7954 Etiwanda Avenue were constructed in 1924 and 1935,
respectively. Like the Etiwanda Realty building, little information is available on their
history.
Sites #7 -10: 12820. 12830. 12840. 17848. and 12860 Chervil - The four single family
residences at 12830, 12840, 12848, and 12860 were built in 1949, 1933, 1956, and 1952,
respectively. The residence at 12820 appears to be from the 1920s. Staff has spoken with
the property owner and found that the residence at 12820 was relocated to Rancho
Cucamonga from San Bernardino. Also, the structures at 12830 and 12840 Chervil were
relocated from "B" Street in Ontario. As with the other structures, staff has found no
information on the history of the structures as it relates to Rancho Cucamonga.
Site #11:7834 !=tiwanda Avenue - Built in 1948, staff has found no historical information
on the single family residence.
HPC STAFF REPORT
LD 95-04 - MOORE
January 10, 1995
Page 3
Other Structures - Other than the Assessor's information no other information is available
on other structures within the application boundaries. Staff has viewed the sites and
determined that many of the structures (primarily single family residences) were built in the
1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. Most of the structures are modest homes of no historical
significance.
ENVIRONMFNTAL ASSFSSMENT: Under most circumstances, designating a structure(s) as a
Point of Interest is categorically exempt under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Because the applicant intends to develop a commercial center at this location, staff has assessed
the parcels assuming that all structures will be demolished by the applicant as part of the center
development. Because the project does have some historical significance, albeit limited, the
project will require issuance of a Negative Declaration under CEQA. The requirement to place
plaques at the site of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church and the Ingvaldsen Store and Home are
appropriate mitigations for the application.
RECOMMI=NDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend
designating the Sacred Heart Catholic Church and the T. Ingvaldsen and Sons General Store and
Home/Regina Restaurant site as a Point of Histodc Interest through adoption of the attached
Resolution. Staff also recommends that the Histodc Preservation Commission determine all other
structures identified within the application parameters as Surveyed Determined Insignificant at this
time through minute action. If additional information becomes available that demonstrates historical
significance of a structure, the Historic Preservation Commission can reconsider designation at that
time.
BB:SM/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "B" Building Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Building Pictures
Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY
Address:
View Looking b4O~ . Date of Photo |[~ ~ I ~:~.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY
Address: I Z~ 2.. ~ L.~ ~t.-',,,/g:>.. AP# ~..~-7 - ~'2.1 - I,~-
View Looking
· Da~ofPhoto ~ ~~. tc~l.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY
View Looking ,...~~ . Dal~ofPho~o lb ~--!=~t'~j~l.
View Looking W.,~'~"
. Date of Photo
H/STORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY
View Looking
View Looking
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST TO DESIGNATE THE
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH AND T. INGVALDSEN AND SONS
STORE/REGINA RESTAURANT SITES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AS A POINTS OF
HISTORIC INTEREST - APN: 227-211-24 AND 25 AND 227-221-01, 02, AND
14.
A. Recitals.
1. E.F. Moore & Associates has filed an application for a Histodc Landmark or Point of
Histodc Interest designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Point of Historic Interest is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 10, 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 56.8 acres of land generally located north of
Foothill Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, and southeast of Interstate 15.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 10, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed sites were connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
FacEs:
The Scared Heart Catholic Church provided a gathering
location for many of the prominent residents of the
Eftwanda area. Of particular note are the Italian wine-
making families of the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda
Avenue area including, but not limited to, the Guidera,
DiCario, Schiro, and Masi families who were involved in
the Church at some point.
The T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store was owned and
operated by Thorwald Ingvaldsen from 1914 to 1941,
supplying various construction supplies and general
merchandise to the Etiwanda area. In 1941, the store
was converted to a restaurant by the John Prevedello
family. Don Casaletti and Don Columbero took over the
operation of the restaurant in 1945.
HPC RESOLUTION NO.
POI 96-01 - MOORE
January 10, 1996 '
Page 2
Finding 2:
The proposed sites are connected with a business or use
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s:
The Sacred Heart Catholic Church provided a major focus
for the Etiwanda community with its location on Foothill
Boulevard. While the Church plans to relocate to another
part of Etiwanda, the location on Foothill Boulevard will be
lost.
The T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store provided construction
supplies and general merchandise for the Etiwanda
residents. The general store was one of three general
stores in the Etiwanda area in the early 1900s and the
only one located on Foothill Boulevard.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Histodc Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Historic Preservation Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as
a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Histodc Preservation
Commission dudrig the public headng, the Histodc Preservation Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Point of Historic Interest 96-01 including the
following conditions:
1)
With demolition of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church, any new
development shall be required to install a plaque commemorating the
social contributions made by the church in the Etiwanda area. The final
location, design, and wording of the plaque shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The
plaque installation shall be completed prior to occupancy of any
structures on the site.
2)
Development of the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and
Etiwanda Avenue shall require the placement of a plaque
commemorating the site of the T. Ingvaldsen and Sons Store
HPC RESOLUTION NO.
POI96-01- MOORE
January 10, 1996
Page 3
o
established in 1914 and, later, its conversion to the Regina Restaurant.
The final location, design, and wording of the plaque shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The
plaque installation shall be completed prior to occupancy of any
structures on the site.
The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 1996.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Bred Buller, Secretary
I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 10th day of January 1996, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: