Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/02/22 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 22, 1995 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA III. IV. Ve Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Lumpp Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Announcements Approval of Minutes January 11, 1995 Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the relatedproject. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. AH such opinions shah be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to relocate and replace historic trees along Highland Avenue in conjunction with installation of traffic signals and street widening at the intersection of Highland and East Avenues. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. VI. Public Comments This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII. Commission Business VIII. Adjournment I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi~ that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 16, 1995, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954. 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. VICINITY MAP ' I" "":'""":':':':':':':':': ..../': '::::':::::::':': ........I~:':':' .~ "'""-'".'.'.'.'.'- .......':':'1...I........... '.'..... I .... A, iT.& $.F. t~lul CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 22, 1995 Chairman & Members of the Historic Preservation Commission William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer ~nvironmental Assessment and Historic Landmark Alteration Permit 95- 01 City of Rancho Cucamonga - A request to relocate and replace historic trees along Highland Avenue in conjunction with the installation of traffic signals and related street widening at the intersection of Highland and East Avenues. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. BACKGROUND Between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, along Highland Avenue, are palm and eucalyptus trees dating back to the founding of Etiwanda by the Chaffee Brothers and a time of citrus growing in Etiwanda. These trees have been designated a City Historic Landmark and are a part of the Etiwanda Windrows Historic Landscape (identified as National Register eligible by the Boute 30 Environmental Impact Statement). These windrows are also identified within the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan. The eucalyptus windbreak trees are located on the south side of Highland Avenue and the palm trees are on the north side of the street. The City Council has directed that a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Highland Avenue and East Avenue. In order to safely make such an installation, the profile of East Avenue should be changed as it crosses Highland Avenue, and Highland Avenue should be widened enough to provide left turn lanes for east and westbound traffic. These changes to the intersection and to Highland Avenue will necessitate a modification to the historic trees in the area. PROPOSED ALTERATION The street work will require the relocation of nine palm trees on the north side of Highland Avenue from East Avenue to the west. It is proposed to relocate eight of the trees directly west to fill gaps in the row of palm trees which have been caused by fire and disease over the years. Exhibit "A" shows this plan. The eight trees would each be moved several hundred feet. One other palm tree can be moved a few feet to the side to clear the street widening and nearby electric wires. On the south side of Highland Avenue, near East Avenue, the reconstruction of the profile and storm drain will cause some eucalyptus trees to be removed. These IT~4 A HPC STAFF REPORT LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 22, 1995 Page 2 trees will be replaced within the right-of-way at the ratio normally used in the area. Most eucalyptus trees in this location have been destroyed by fire or beetle infestation and only stumps remain. Stump removal necessitated by the roadwork will create spaces for replacement trees. FUTURm CNaNGmS This intersection is listed in the Etiwanda Specific Plan as requiring a Neighborhood Entry landscaping treatment which affects tree placement at the corners. When the Routes 15/30 interchange is built east of this location, this intersection will be changed significantly. East Avenue will rise about ten feet and Highland Avenue will remain at existing grade on the west side of East Avenue. For this reason, all tree replacement will be temporary because the interchange construction is scheduled for 1998. It is intended to plant replacement eucalyptus trees in general conformance with the Neighborhood Entry concept on the southwest corner, so that existing trees will be replaced. In the northwest corner, no replacement trees are proposed because palm trees replacement will be a part of the interchange project, and no other types of trees are present. Also, there are no trees being affected on the east side of the intersection. FACTS FOR FINDINGS Staff believes that the Historic Preservation Commission can make the following findings required by Section 12G of Ordinance No. 70 for the approval of the application: A. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of Ordinance No. 70; and B. The action will not be detrimental to a structure feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural or engineering interest or value of a historic nature; and C. The proposed action is not in conflict with the provisions of the General Plan, or Etiwanda Specific Plan. ~NVIRON~m~T~?. ASSWSS~T Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed and are attached to this report. It has been determined that the mitigation measures set forth in this report will be sufficient to allow issuance of a Negative Declaration. COl~R~SPOND~NC~ This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. HPC STAFF REPORT LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 22, 1995 Page 3 RRCOM)~NDATION: It is recommended that the Historic Preservation Commission approve Landmark Alteration Permit 95-01 and issue a Negative Declaration for the proposed project by the adoption of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Will J~~. 0'Neil ~ City Engineer WJO:PAR:sd Attachments: Exhibit A - Location map Exhibit B - 15/30 Interchange map Initial Study, Parts I and II Resolution of Approval :T'-'~'="~-- ~ ~ I~ :~ ~ ~ ~ _....~__._ GAPS TO BE FILLED _-_._/;~-~../~.--~__ --_.:/~ ~ / WITH ~LOCATED TREES ;_~~ ~~~ ....... . ......~ ",'~ ................... - _ ..... , , EXHIBIT A (cont. on next page) GAPS TO BE FILLED WITH RELOCATED TREES ~ ~~ / ~ ~'~ ., ~. : ~ ' .~ .-/ ,,- " ~ /' ~ ~ - , : /' ' 'i~ ~ ~ ",N t~," ~-- SC/~LE: 1' = 200/ ! FGENn PALM TREES TO BE RELOCATED REMAINING PALM TREES EUCALYPTUS TREE ROW (PARTIALLY DESTROYED BY FIRE AND BEETLE INFESTATION) PAVEMENT WIDENING EXHIRIT A (conL) PROPOSED TREE RELOCATION AND REPLACEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH ROADWAY WIDENING ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part l - Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains= /~/~ Contact Person & Address: Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different fro~ above): Telephone N,,mh~r: P~OJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTIO~ Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. -1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 X 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) 3) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 4) Assessor's Parcel N,~mhers (attach additional sheet if necessary): *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): ~/~ *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications ): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topoqraphy, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photogral~hs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) .- 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): / ~ 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc. ) and how they will affect proposed uses: 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-f-m~ly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of t. he project? 15) '16) Indicate the type of short-term ~nd long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What metho4s of sound proofing are proposed? In.cate pro~sed re~vals ancot replac~ents of ~t~e or scenic trees: 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: 18) 19) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. esidenti l (galXda ) Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) a. Peak use (gal/day) b. Peak use (gal/min/ac) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ~/~ Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) b. Industrial/Commercial (gal/day/ac) RES ZDE~Z'ZAL Pm~T~TS 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) 22) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High= 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of co~mercial, industrial, or institutional uses by ty~e: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) 29) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air ~ollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ALL P~JECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. I hereby certify ~hat the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the ~a~a and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my a~ility, that the fa~'~s, statements, and information presented are true and corre~ ~o the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that add/tion&l information may be required to be submitted before an a~equate ev&luation can be mm~e by the City of P~ncho Cucamonga. D. te: //-/?_ ?z/sic.t=... Title: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (Part II- Initial Study) II II. ~avi~oameat~l Imp~t~ (Expla~mtions of [11 "yes" a~d ".~ybe" ~nswers ~re ~equired on ~tt~ched sheets. ) Y~ ~y~ No 1. !{~.z~b. Will 1:be propo, ml result in: Unstable e~r~cb conditions or in ctta~es in geologic ~ut~t ructure8? be Disruptions, displax:~uents, ccmpaction or overcoverin~ of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of ~ny unique geologic or physical features? e® Any increase in ~d. nd or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? fe Ch~nBes in deposition or erosion of besch sands. or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion ~hicb may modify the channel of a river or streaxn or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposm,~ of people or property to gsoloqic hazards such as earthc,,'-kes, landslides, mudstides, ground fz '~.~ or stellar hazards? X C I T Y O F R A N C H OC U C A M O N G A Y~ ~y~ No Will the proposal result in: Water. a. Substantial a_tr -missions or deterioration of ambient air cfualtty? b. The creation of obJectioDable odors? c. Alteration of a.tr movement, moisture, or tempel-ztu_r~, or ~ny' ctlar~e in clt.~te, either locally or re~ion-lllr? Will the proposal result in: Do de ee Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of mater mov~nents, in either .~ine or fresh maters? Changes lu absorpticm rates, drainage pt- terns, or the rate and ~mount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or lo~ of flood Change in the amount of surface mater in may ~ter bodFP Discharge into surface maters, or in may alter~tion of surface ,~ter quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Erouzxt ~ters? Change in the c~ntity of F, rour~i eaters, either through direct ~dditions or mith- dr~rals, or throuEh interception of an aquifer by cuts or excautions? Substanti%l reduction in the amount of water othersrise available for public mater supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to eater re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or n~- her of any species of plants (includir~ trees, shrubs, ~rass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of ~n.v unique, rare or e~d~ngered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an are~, or in a b~rrier ~o the normal replenish- ~ent of existin~ species? d. Rsduction in acres~e of any a~riculturml crop? 5. AnJ~al Life. Will the proposal result in: ~ybe CTmn&e Ln the diversity of species, or u~- hers of any species of ante~ls (birds, land antmls iucludtn& reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic or~ani~$ or insects)? b. Reduction of the n,~ers of any unique, rare or end~nsered species of artemis? Introduction of new species of an~n~ls into an ~rea, or r~sult in · barrier to the m~Sra- tim or movesent of an~ls? d. Deterioration to existins fish or eildlife habitat? 6. Rol~e. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. light amJ Glare. Will ~he propmml produce new light or glare? Land Oee. eill the propoeal result in · sub- staatt·l ·lterttiou of the present or planned laad use of an area? 9. ~tural ~. Will the propom~l result in: Incretse in the rate of use of any natural resources? I0. ~ of Upeet. eill the propoeal involve: A risk of an exploeloa or the release of h~zardous subst~ces (Lncl~dtng, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radLttiou) in the event of an accident or upset condor ion~? b. P~sslble interference with an ~ergency response plato or an ~nergency evacuatiou pl~,~? 11. Populaticm. Will the propo~ml miter the loc~tion, distribution, density, or growth r~te of the human population of an are~? 12. ~k~siag. Will the proDosal affect exlstiug hous- ing, or create a d~and for additiomal housing? 13. Traas~rtatl~/Clr~ulatio~. Will the proposal r~sult in: a. Generatiom of substantial additio--1 vehicular b. Effects cm existing parking facilities, or d~,--d for mew parking? $ub~tantial impact u~on existing transpor- tatiota systems? d. Alterations to present ~tterms of circula- tion or mov~ent of people and/or ~oods? e. Alteratio~s to ,~aterborme, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycllsts or pedestrians? 14. Public Serwtces. Will the proposal .have an effect upon, or result tn a need for me~ or altered g~v- ermmem:al services lm any of the follo~ia$ areas: 9. Fire protectio~? b. Police p~otectto~? c. Schools? d. P~r~s oc other recreatio~l fzctiities? e. ~Lnteu~nce o! public f~ctLit£es, including roads? f. Other 8overument~ services? :5. ~net~T. Will the ptopo~l result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ~nybe No Yes ~0 16. Substantial iocr_~se in d~nd upon existing sources or energy, or require the develo~m~ent of nee sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 1T. Bt~n Be~lth. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any be-~lth h~*~rd or potential health hs~zard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health h~zards? 18. Ae~hetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or ~ill the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. 19. !~reatlon. ~ill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing retreatloewi opport,,ntties? 20. Cult'tirol Re~ot~rce~. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destructiou of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? be Will the proposal result in adverse $~ysical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic buildin~, structure, or object? Ce Does the propo~l have the potential to cause a physical cha~e ehicb ~ould ~ffect unique ef~aic cultural vtlues? Will the proposal restrict existin~ reli$ious or sacred uses within the potential ~ct are~? 21. ¥~l~toz? F4~4~-~s of Si~nificance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially .reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a flsa or wildlife population to drop belo~ self sustainin~ levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ccmnunity, re- duce the ntmber or restrict the ran~e of a r~re or enM~gered pl~n~~ani~l or eliminate de important examples of the major periods of Califoruia history or prehistor}¢ Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantai~e of long-term, enviror~nental Eoal$? (A short-term iillp~ct on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time mhile lonE-term impacts will endure ~ell into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- sider~ble? (A project may impa~t on two or more separate resources where the ~mp~ct om e~cb resource is relatively ,~ll, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is sl~nificant.) Does the project have euvironmental effects rotrich will muse substauttal adverse effects on h,,-,mu beinEs, either directly or indirectly? III. Dimcummiou of ~nvi~ou~t~l Bv~lu~tiou (Narrative description of environmental impacts.) D~te (To be completed by the L~ A~e~cy.) On the ~-~ts of this initial evaluation: I find that the pro[x~ed project COJLD D~r have a siEnificant effect on the e~vironment, ~nd a bI~.~TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could h~ve a sisnificant effect oe the e~viroement, there will not be a si~nific~nt effect in this case because the etttl~atio~ m~mmzre~ described oe an attached s~eet have been added to the project. A NlrATIrE D~ClJtBATION WILL BE P~.PAR~D. I find the proposed project MAY have a si~tficant effect o~ the envi~o~,~t, sad an ~VI~AL IMPAC~ IU~ is required. Sl~t~e RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT NO. 95-01 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET WIDENING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AND EAST AVENUES. A. Recitals 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the issuance of Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Historic Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of February 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows= 1. The Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 22, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 25 palm and eucalyptus trees located west of the intersection of Highland and East Avenues. b. The application proposes the relocation and replacement of several of the historic trees along Highland Avenue. c. The alteration is necessary to accommodate the widening and drainage work at the intersection. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of Ordinance No. 70; and HPC RESOLUTION NO. LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 22, 1995 Page 2 b. The action will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature; and c. The proposed action is not in conflict with the provisions of the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Palm trees shall be relocated to selected spots along Highland Avenue as approved by the City Planner and eucalyptus trees which require removal shall be replaced in conformance with Chapter 5.41 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and subject to detail plans approved by the City Planner. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. HPC RESOLUTION NO. LAP 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 22, 1995 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 1995. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Co~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Co~nission held on the 22nd day of February 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: