Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/11/07 - Agenda Packet 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA THURSDAY NOVEMBER 7, 1991 7:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCA14ONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz PP"Commissioner Banks 11-77,� Commissioner Preston _ Commissioner Billings �* Chairman Schmidt Commissioner Cooper III. Approval of Minutes October 3, 1991 HPC minutes IV. Old 'Business UPDATE OF ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE HISTORIC SITE LIST FOR THE OLD ALTA LOMA AREA - (Continued from October 3, 1991 ) PACKING HOUSE STATUS UPDATE - (Oral Report) ORAL HISTORY UPDATE - (Oral Report) V. New Business ` ..:, ,. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES AT 12892 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8062 ETIWANDA AVENUE - The Regina Restaurant, SUS (Ingvaldsen Store) and (Ingvaldsen) Home, PLL - Due to Declared Dangerous Conditions APN: 227-221-14. FORMATION OF A SUBCOMMITTEE TO MEET WITH COUNCIL MEMB$R WRIGHT •, ._�, �'i. ._ tit-l-Ccc.. FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MITIGATION POLICY - (Oral Report) VI. Commission Business PROPOSED CANCELLATION OF JANUARY 2, 1991 MEETING - (Oral Report) VII. Announcements VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. I8. Adjournment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 3, 1991 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Schmidt then led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Melicent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gene Billings, Alan Haskvitz, Steven Preston, Bob Schmidt COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Ada Cooper STAFF PRESENT: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner Larry Henderson, Principal Planner Buffie Hollis, Intern Shelley Petrelli, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION: Moved by Billings, seconded by Banks, carried 6-0-1 , to accept the August 27, 1991 and September 5, 1991 minutes. OLD BUSINESS A. UPDATE OF ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE HISTORIC SITE LIST FOR THE OLD ALTA LOMA AREA Buffie Hollis, Intern, presented the staff report. Commissioner Banks asked what boundaries were used for the study. Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner, commented that the boundaries were set by the Commission at a previous meeting. Commissioner Billings made a point of correction that Helmer House was actually a portion of the Hermosa School. He gave additional information on two houses that moved from the rabbitry to other locations: one was moved to the West side of Hellman and LaGrande; the Ray Ford house was moved to Archibald Avenue, just south of the Baptist Church. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing because there was no one who wished to speak. MOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Billings, to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Preston felt that some of the properties identified as Potential Local Landmarks (PLL) were identified as such for lack of a more appropriate designation. He pointed out that some of the structures may not be historically or architecturally significant enough to stand on their own as a PLL, but instead they could be considered contributing structures in the neighborhood or area. He felt that some of the properties may fall short of the Commission's standards for a PLL designation and that perhaps another designation should be considered by the Commission. He expressed a need either to go through the list and identify different designations, or to ask for further delineation of some of the structures (considering they may be contributing structures) and add a new identifying code. He wished to clarify the situation before developing the terminology for the Alta Loma Specific Plan. Commissioner Banks disagreed with Commissioner Preston and stated that a Potential Local Landmark meant that the Commission would examine a structure thoroughly before removing it from the list. Commissioner Preston felt changes should be made at this stage rather than later on in the process. He felt that holding a public hearing for some of these structures would be difficult if the Commission could not substantiate a PLL designation with the appropriate supporting documentation. Commissioner Banks stated that the survey was done prior to Commissioner Preston's involvement with the Commission and explained that the Commission wanted to make certain they had all the information on a structure (i.e. , public input, etc. ) before eliminating it as a PLL from the list. Commissioner Preston commented he found approximately nine structures that could require a different designation. He asked what recourse would be available if the owner of a Potential Local Landmark came to the Planning counter and wanted to alter his home. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated that there is not much staff can do except make suggestions to the property owner. Commissioner Haskvitz asked if the area fell within the percentages to be considered an Historic District. Ms. Hollis stated that generally the requirement is that 75 percent of t!,e structures should be contributing and the area does not meet that percentage. Commissioner Preston clarified that Ms. Hollis meant a national district , n a local district, since the City does not have any district criteria. HPC MINUTES -2- OCTOBER 3, 1aql Commissioner Billings favored making the area a local district. He also felt the 25 foot lot setbacks were significant for the area. Mr. Henderson suggested continuing the item until next month and requested the Commissioners call staff with information on any of the structures that they feel may be incorrectly designated. Commissioner Haskvitz suggested keeping the Monte Vista houses together as a group rather than treating each house individually. Commissioner Billings commented that the Monte Vista Avenue houses were historically known as "shack alley" because they were small houses built for the laborers and their families. Commissioner Preston withdrew his original motion and Commissioner Billings withdrew his second. MOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Banks, carried 6-0-1, to continue the item to the next meeting in order for the Commission to have further time to review the material and for staff to review the question of designations and address the treatment of Monte Vista Avenue. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER --carried COMMISSION BUSINESS There was no Commission Business to present. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman Schmidt informed staff and the Commission that they may be contacted by Bob Lundy or JoAnn Roebuck regarding using a portion of the Thomas Winery building to form a Route 66 visitor center and museum. They would like to make a presentation at the next Commission meeting regarding their ideas for the museum. Mr. Henderson reminded the Commission if anyone wishes to appear on the agenda they must submit a letter to the HPC staff or the HPC Chairman stating the reason for their presentation if they want direction or a decision from the Commission. Chairman Schmidt commented he had informed them that was the way to proceed. HPC MINUTES -3- OCTOBER 3, 1991 Mr. Henderson informed the Commission that Council member Pam Wright has requested a review of mitigation measures for historic sites and she wants to set a City Policy for these measures. She has volunteered to be on the subcommittee with HPC members to set the policy. The selection of the HPC subcommittee is to take place at the November 7, 1991 meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT The Historic Preservation Commission adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Shelley A. Petrelli Secretary HPC MINUTES -4- OCTOBER 3, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation CommissZ FROM: Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: UPDATE OF ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE HISTORIC SITE LIST FOR THE OLD ALTA LOMA AREA - (Continued from October 3, 1991 ) BACKGROUND: On October 3, 1991, the Commission reviewed the proposed changes to the Site List as suggested by staff. Due to the size and detail of the survey completed by Graduate Intern Buffie Hollis, the Commission concurred that more time was needed to review fully the modifications. In particular, Commissioner Preston shared with staff a list of concerns about specific potential designations and impacts of future restrictions resulting from the implementation of the Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan. Staff has not heard from any other Commissioner with further concerns. ANALYSIS: The primary concerns focused on eight structures whose potential local landmark designations did not correspond to the levels of significance. Further issues raised included support for a district type of designation which would target structures that did not qualify for individual landmark designation but contributed to the overall historic fabric of a specific area. There are a few difficulties with creating such a designation or potential designation at this time, however. The first of these hurdles is the fact that our Historic Preservation Ordinance does not enable the Commission to designate structures as district contributors. The second complication is that the preferred percentage of contributing structures in an historic district is 75 percent and that ideal is not met in the Old Alta Loma area. Staff has reviewed carefully concerns regarding the lack of sufficient evidence needed for a local landmark designation on the eight properties identified. Staff contends that the following structures do merit that potential designation and thus finds them to have adequate significance to qualify per our Ordinance. 0 9420 La Grande, Lombardo/Lawyer House (pages A-106 to A-108 in the October Agenda Packet): The Lawyer family, town barbers and founders of the Alta Loma Community Club, were important contributors to the area's past and their home, b. 1928, retains much of its original integrity. t'_YYZ / HPC STAFF REPORT UPDATE OLD ALTA LOMA November 7, 1991 Page 2 0 9404 La Grande, Dixon/Rupp House (pp. A-42 to A-44) : This Jewett and Blair home dating from 1928 was also the home of the Rupp family in later years and despite minor alterations has maintained its historic character - including an original garage. 0 9436 La Grande, Dixon/Marler House (pp. A-48 to A- 50) : The structure was built in 1928, and although no one owner emerges as extremely significant, the house has retained a strong sense of style and integrity. 0 9393 Lomita, Derfer House, (pp.A-75-A-77) : This circa 1928 home derives its primary associate significance from its occupation by the Derfer family, owner of Blake's dry goods store in downtown Alta Loma. The remaining four structures brought to staff's attention do lack the specific ownership data or architectural integrity needed to confirm completely a confident potential local landmark designation. However, in staff's opinion, they do have enough individual merit to prohibit a Surveyed Determined Insignificant designation. Further research is thus needed to complete the record on the following buildings: 0 9328 La Grande, Page House (pp. A-39-A-40) , which dates from the mid-1904s and does not have evidence of a significant ownership history; 0 9378 La Vine, Schmutz House (pp. A-54 to A-56) , as with the Page house, the later date b. 1940 and no clear ownership pattern, the house falls short of a PLL determination; 0 7126 Amethyst, Clayton Garage and Service Center (pp. A-89 to A-90) , since 1917 a garage/service station has operated on this site and although altered, does serve an important fixture in the downtown area; 0 9403 La Mesa, Williams (pp. A-111 to A-113) , as one of the few intact street facades from the mid-1940s, this structure as well cannot be easily dismissed. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff therefore recommends that the Commission accept the recommended changes to the Historic Site List as specified in Exhibit HPC-1 of the staff report dated October 3, 1991 , except for the following structures which should receive a Survey Undetermined Significance designation until further research proves differently: A -- Z HPC STAFF REPORT UPDATE OLD ALTA LOMA November 7, 1991 Page 3 9328 La Grande, Page House (pp. A-39 to A-40 ) 9378 La Vine, Schmutz House (pp. A-54 to A-56) 7126 Amethyst, Clayton Garage and Service Center (pp. A-89 to A-90) , 9403 La Mesa, Williams House (pp. A-111 to A-113) Also recommended is that staff examine the need for a district-like designation into the work underway on the Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan. Respectfully submitted, Lary Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LH:BH:js CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES AT 12892 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 8062 ETIWANDA AVENUE - The Regina Restaurant, SUS (Ingvaldsen Store) and (Ingvaldsen) Home, PLL - Due to Declared Dangerous Conditions - APN: 227-221-14. BACKGROUND: In mid-July of this year, the City's Building and Safety Department working with the Fire Department began an abatement process for the three structures located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Per their procedures, Building and Safety alerted the property owner, Luke Hsiao, that despite previous efforts to secure the buildings, vandalism and illegal trespassing had resumed (please reference Exhibit HPC-1 for copies of the letter to Mr. Hsiao and the memo forwarded to Carlos Silva from Chief Almand) . Shortly thereafter, Mr. Silva notified staff that he had been in contact with the property owner and that two of the structures in question were on the Historic Site List--the row of small motel rooms date to c. 1950. Staff received a copy of this letter in early October and has since requested that the Planning Department be copied immediately on all such letters which potentially impact buildings listed on the survey or appearing to be over fifty years of age. Staff reviewed and photographed the structures in late August. Along with the scars of vandalism, staff found that both the store/restaurant and the house had undergone numerous additions and alterations (see section D of this report for a full architectural description) . Prior research had not been done on either structure. Although listed as a Potential Local Landmark (PLL) , for instance, the Ingvaldsen Home file only contained an "Interview Checklist" (see Exhibit HPC-2) whish obliquely referenced 1914 as a possible construction date. Assessor information contained in the file on 12892 Foothill Boulevard only went back to 1944 when Anna Marie Inqvaldsen was listed as the owner. Staff was notified after the property owner decided to demolish the structures, but was faced with limited options per the City ' s ordinance. In the case of determined "unsafe and dangerous" conditions , our Historic Preservation ordinance states, "None of the provisions of the chapter shall be construed to prevent any measures of construction., alteration, removal, demolition or relocation necessary to correct HPC STAFF REPORT REGINA RESTAURANT DEMOLITION November 7, 1991 Page 2 unsafe or dangerous conditions of any structure, other feature, or part thereof, which such condition has been declared unsafe or dangerous by the building official, after informing the historic preservation commission when the structure is a landmark, and where the proposed measures have been declared necessary by such official to correct the said conditions," (section 2.24. 150). Thus our powers are limited with landmarked and especially non landmarked structures that have been determined dangerous. It is important to note that per the approved Foothill Marketplace project (Price Club and Walmart) on the southwest corner of the intersection, both Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue are scheduled to be widened to their ultimate dimensions. This widening would have impacted the home and taken much of the restaurant/store (please refer to Exhibit HPC-3) . SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The corner parcel is approximately .86 acres in size and is square in shape. A relatively level lot, the site has no outstanding topographic characteristics and is dotted with mature/overgrown vegetation. B. Site Land Use, Zoning, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Designation (FSP) : The site in question falls into Subarea 4 of the FSP and has been designated Community Commercial. As an Activity Center, future development per the FSP will emulate the architectural, landscape architectural, and streetscape elements of other such nodes along Foothill. This decision was "due to the amount of vacant land and nondescript architectural legacy" found in the area (FSP, IV-9.52) . C. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan designation: Land to the north, east, and southeast of the site also are zoned Community Commercial per the FSP, while acreage to the south is slated for Regional Commercial development. D. Architectural Descriptions: Ingvaldsen Store/Restaurant (please refer to Exhibit HPC-4 for photographs) : A one-story rectangular structure, the restaurant is dominated by an asymmetrical front gabled roof added to its facade. The gable of low pitch extends to the west to form a Porte cochere that is supported by clustered posts atop piers constructed of finished, irregular stone laid flush in an irregular pattern. This decorative stone treatment extends along the facade's main bay on the ground level and appears to have been used as a planter. The siding material along this gabled front is vertically laid planks, stained to a dark brown, whereas most of the other exterior surfaces have been covered with stucco. "Regina" is spelled in HPC STAFF REPORT REGINA RESTAURANT DEMOLITION November 7, 1991 Page 3 large, white letters in a script style in the pediment area of the front gable and the "i' is dotted with a small, three-pointed crown. Many windows of different sizes and types are found around the exterior of the structure. A number of additions have been made to this structure as well. It appears from a small portion of exposed wood siding and from a site inspection made as the building was being demolished, that the original store was a square building to the north (rear) to which a shed-roof addition had been added. At least three other single- storied additions abut the north side of the structure. Ingvaldsen Hose (see Exhibit HPC-5 for photographs) : This single -storied structure with a dominant side gable roofline sits on a raised foundation and dates from approximately 1910-1920. The house is covered with lapped wood siding as is the space between the main sill and the ground. A centered porch with a gable pediment covers the front entrance and is supported by two 4" x 4" posts to which decorative brackets are attached. The porch pediment facia board has a decorative scoop-like treatment applied to the two ends and this unusual trim style is continued to all the exposed rafter ends as well as the facia boards of the gabled roof. Plywood laid over the windows obscured observation of their fenestration patterns, but it appears that most were double-hung with one-over-one lights. At least three additions were made to the house over the years. The porch area appears to have been altered and screened after the period of original construction. Three shed-like additions have been constructed adjoining the south and west of the house; the most significant of which extended the southwest corner of house full one bay to the north. ANALYSIS: From a study of phone directories dating from 1914 to 1951 , it appears that the Thorwald Ingvaldsen family lived on and operated a general store, T. Ingvaldsen and Son, from this site. On the corner of San Bernardino Road and Etiwanda Avenue, according to the 1914 directory, the family sold a wide variety of goods including lumber, lime, bricks, pipe, doors, furnishings, hardware, hay, and groceries. Per the 1934 directory, the Ingvaldsen family continued to operate the general store. By 1941, however, management of the store had changed and the John Prevedello family had begun to operate a restaurant. Shortly thereafter in 1945, Don Casaletti and Anthony Columbero were listed in the directory as running the Regina Cafe on the corner site. The assessor information lists Anna Ingvaldsen as the owner of the property until 1944 when it shifted to Joseph and Marcella Teoddo. Ownership as well as occupancy of the home is not readily determined because both the home and the store were on the same parcel. HPC STAFF REPORT REGINA RESTAURANT DEMOLITION November 7, 1991 Page 4 It is difficult to discern the original shape of the store structure because of its later remodeling as a restaurant. From analysis performed during the demolition process, it appears that little if any of the original interior or exterior integrity of the corner building remained. The house, while undergoing significant additions, had seen less alterations to its original fabric, but it too was in a deteriorated condition. Although portions of the site's chronology are murky in detail, the structures did play a part in at least two historic epochs of Etiwanda history, that of the earlier, turn-of-the-century settlement and of the later Italian immigration pattern. However, most of the buildings' architectural integrity has been lost over the y+®ars and especially through serious neglect in recent times. In relating this preliminary research to the landmark designation criteria laid out in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, and placing aside temporarily the powers given to the Building Official when structures are determined unsafe and dangerous, the main structure would probably not have qualified as a local landmark and certainly not over an owner's objection. RECOMMENDATION: Staff endorses the following measures in response to the demolition of the Ingvaldsen Home and Store/Regina Restaurant: 1 ) formalize review process between Building and Safety and Planning Departments so that all historic or potentially historic structures in dangerous condition will be reviewed by Planning staff at the onset; 2) modify the Historic Sites List to cross-reference the two addresses, complete the data for each and denote that any future development of the subject site will research further the structure's history and incorporate commemorative documentation into the conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Letter from the Building and Safety Department Exhibit "HPC-2" - Interview Checklist Exhibit "HPC-3" - Site Plan/Proposed Widening Exhibit "HPC-4" - Photographs of the Ingvaldsen Store Exhibit "HPC-5" - Photographs of the Ingvaldsen House T E A NC HO C UC A MONG � July 18, 1991 Project 1 18 C/O Luke Hsiao 7365 Carnelian St. Suite #214 Rancho Cucamonga , CA 91730 RE: DANGEROUS STRUCTURES AT 12892 FOOTHILL - APN #227-221-14 This letter is to notify you, as the owner or record of the above-referenced property, that the Building and Safety Division conducted a field inspection on July 16, 1991 , and found the buildings and premises vacant, and left in an unsecured condition. The structures on the premises are in a dilapidated and deteriorated condition due to the fact that the premises are abandoned and unsecured. All three buildings were boarded-up at one time, but because of the continued vandalism, the buildings are again in an unsecured condition. The interior of all three buildings have extensive damage due to vandalism, with the restaurant having additional damage that was caused by a fire which occurred in 1984. In addition, the exterior of the restaurant has been covered with graffiti . The Fire Department has also submitted a report constituting all three structures to be a fire hazard. These conditions deem the premises dangerous, an attractive nuisance violation of Section 301 of the Uniform Code for the abatement of dangerous buildings, 1988 Edition. Section 401 of the Uniform Code for the abatement o` dangerous buildings requires that the Building Official make certa— determinations and take certain action to bring about abatement of dangerous buildings . Accordingly, because of the continued unsecured state 3 vandalism, and because of the existing dangerous condition, we have alternative but to require the structures to be demolished and removed . necessary permits must be obtained no later than August 23, 1991 , and all wor- must be completed within thirty (30) days from the date of permit issuance . If this condition is not remedied by the dates indicated, this office w' " proceed with abatement under the Uniform Code for the abatement of danger.--, buildings , Section 403 ( ii ) , and assess the cost as a lien against t property. Mayor Dennis L Stout Counc lmember Diane Williams Mayor Pro-'em William J Alexander Counc,lmember Pamela J Wright Jack, Lam, AiCP, City Manager Councilmember Charles J Buque, _ar'er ,v@ 17' 0A9Q_I , Dangerous Structures 12892 rootii July 18, 1991 Page 2 Any person having record title or interest in this matter may appeal this Notice and Order, provided the appeal is made in writing as provided in the Uniform Code for the abatement of dangerous buildings , 1988 Edition , within thirty (30) days from receipt of this Notice and Order. Failure to appeal will constitute a waiver of all rights to an Administrative Hearing and determination of the matter. If you have any questions in this matter, please call this office at 989-1,863 , extension 2223. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Building & Safety Division Jerry R. Grant,Building Official (4 —// ""a/ Carlos H. Silva , Sr. Rehabilitation Specialist CS:ks RANCHO CLLAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEMORANDUM TO: Carlos Silva, Rehab Specialist FROM: Lloyd B. Almand, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: July 17, 1991 SUBJECT: Abatement of Hazardous Building Pursuant to Section 2.201(a) and (b) of the Uniform Fire Code, a field survey of the building located at 12982 Foothill Boulevard has shown that it is in fact declared to be a public nuisance and as such is further declared to be a fire hazard as defined by the Uniform Fire Code, Section 9.108 and should therefore be abated. Failure "to take immediate action to abate a fire hazard" after proper notification of such, shall constitute a misdemeanor violation and the persons involved with such fire hazards shall be subject to the provisions of the law (UFC, Section 3.101). If this Fire District can be of further assistance in the abatement of this building, please contact my office. cc: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief Ralph Crane, Deputy Fire Marshal LBA/ss ' I RANCHO CUCA14ONGA HISTORICAL SURVEY INTZRVIEN CHECKLIST YE7S NO 1 . Is the item in its original location? A. Was the item moved to avoid destruction? B. Is the new location similar to the old one? \ C. Did item gain significance after move D. Was item moved to locations for use as as museum or "heritage park"? 2. Has the item been added to, altered or renovated since construction? A. Are there additions to item? B. Do these additions represent an evolution of the item's style or character? C. Were these additions made within the last 30 years? D. Are there changes in item's floor plan since construction? E. Was item remodeled or modernized? F. Has the facade of item been changed? G. Have alterations & repairs been done with similar materials & skills used when item originally built? 3. Was the area surrounding the item changed since when it was built? A. Has site of the item been changed by addition or removal of out-buildings? B. Has site of item been changed by addition or removal of significant landscape? C. Have surrounding properties changed since items construction? D. Has street been widened or rerouted? E. Does area retain character of period of time when -item was built? F. Is item well maintained? 4 . Is item an example of a historic pattern? _ A. industrialization of area? _� T B. Urbanization & settlement of area? C. Immigration of ethnic groups to area? D. Centralization & Consolidation of industries to area? E . Increased role of government in area? _ F . Accelerated methods of communication and travel in area? G. Global influence within the area and and without? _ H. Changes in roles of family, church, -� and education? 5 . Is the item an example of a once common use that is now rare? A. Was item used as living quarters? B. Was item used by local industry? i C. Was item used for local agriculture? —? D. Was item used by local , state or federal governments? E. Was item used by public service, rail road, water company, utility, etc. F . Was item used as school or educational institution? G. Was item used by church or religious organization? 6 . Does item play role in life of a significant INGv�c !jSEN ?Person or organization? A. Of local significance? c B. Of regional significance? C. Of national significance? D. Of international significance? i 7. Was the item the site of an important event? A. Of local importance? B. Of regional importance? C. Of national importance? D. Of international importance? 8. When did item gain importance or significance? A. Prior to 1850? B. 1851 to 1900? C. 1901 to 1945? D. 1946 to 1976? E. 1977 to present? 9. Is item architecturally significant? A. Is item an example of type of style and/or period? B. Are other examples of same style and/ or period in close proximity? C. Was architect of item prominent locally? D. Was builder of item prominent locally? L. Was architect prominent regionally, nationally, internationally? F . Does item represent transition from one style of architecture to another? G. Is item pleasing to look at? ? H. Does item benefit character of neighborhood? I . Does item represent established familiar visual features of area? 1 1 � '4 I f N s,VPW i I ITEM: 6YAV E6iN.4 city i c c onga TITLE:PROF*SED wiDeNr T( Ion er PAP-rN)u../P-77VVA air EXHIBIT:,q)c;3 SCALE: /"= 80 � - C �x ►� � b �-� N PC - 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: AP# 227- Z2-1 - l�-j. ,M V ` i I I View Looking h10�" _• Date of Photo 1IC HISTORIC PRESERVATION CO.WMISSIOti LANDMARK SL:R�-EY .-address: .kP# 2Z7 - Z 2-1 °I 9;1 , �~ r w- View Looking Date of Photo l b 5E?T t291 . I 7� — Z HISTORIC PRESERVATIONCOMMISSION L.-'+NDNIARK SURVEY Address: 12�✓92 H�1 l.t. 81� . A_p# I I I �I a I � I i View Looking SC�V�'�-i— Date of Photo 1 b Ste ' 1991. II ii t� • � ��� -� ,,fir. View Looking Date of Photo Ib S I" HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: AP# 22"7— 2Z-I —l 14 I View Looking `N SST" Date of Photo �mss.,rrs I View Looking _. Date of Photo lb a� j 1. • r�: ti» t s r. lip,I �� _ � sic • Is w . A. • • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 0002. AP# ZZ-7 - 22,1 - 14 'AW View Looking Date of Photo i View Looking Date of Photo �b