Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/09/05 - Agenda Packet v` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 5 , 1991 7:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance U-0 II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz Commissioner Banks - Commissioner Preston Commissioner Billings ,/ Chairman Schmidt Commissioner Cooper L/ III. Approval of Minutes August 1 , 1991 IV. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. A. CONSIDERATION OF A CHANGE OF THE HISTORIC STATUS AND APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OR LANDMARK DESIGNATION FILED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, CONSIDERATION OF A DEMOLITION REQUEST BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND THE POSSIBLE ESTABLISHMENT OF MITIGATIONMEASURES THEREIN FOR THE LA FOURCADE BUILDING LOCATED AT 11871 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 229-011-10 - Consideration and determination of the historic status, application for Point of Interest or Landmark Designation, and level of appropriate mitigations for the demolition of the structure. The range of alternatives may include the following: Landmark status, Point of Interest status, and/or mitigation measures prior to demolition. V. Old Business B. UPDATE ON SANTA FE DEPOT DOCUMENTATION EFFORTS - Oral Report VI. Commission Business C. LETTER IN SUPPORT OF GALLEANO WINERY LANDMARK APPLICATION IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - Oral Report D. LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE FORMATION OF AN INLAND EMPIRE COALITION OF THE CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL VII. Announcements E. UPDATE ON FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (CUP 90-37) APPEAL AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION - Oral Report F. NEW PRESIDENT ELECTED FOR THE CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION - I.E., Commissioner Steve Preston VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. I%. Adjournment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 1 , 1991 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Schmidt then led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Melicent Arner, Marsha Banks (arrived at 7:09 p.m. ) , Gene Billings, Ada Cooper, Alan Haskvitz Steve Preston, Bob Schmidt COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: NONE STAFF PRESENT: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Shelley Petrelli, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION: Moved by Billings, seconded by Arner, carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Commissioner Banks arrived. after the vote) to approve the June 6, 1991 Historic Preservation minutes, as amended. OLD BUSINESS A. UPDATE ON PACKING HOUSE REUSE STUDY Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner presented the staff report. She commented that Architectural Resources Group was contracted to perform the Adaptive Reuse and Rehabilitation Study of the Alta Loma Packing House. She also mentioned if after the feasibility study determines it is possible, the structures would be rehabilitated for senior housing and/or a mixed use complex. B. UPDATE ON FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE/PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. HPC MINUTES - 1 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 Chairman Schmidt asked if the Planning Commission had the power to overturn a Historic Preservation Commission decision. Ms. Hartig stated that the Council makes the final approval on the Environmental Assessment determination of some types of projects. Commissioner Banks clarified the Planning Commission was not the final decision-making body in this case, but she questioned the outcome of a mitigated Historic Preservation Commission project if that project did not go to Council for a final decision. Commissioner Preston explained that a conflict exists between two different provisions of City law; one provision states that the Historic Preservation Commission reports to and advises the Council, while the other provision (mandated by State law) states that the final decision-making body on Environmental mitigation measures is the body which grants final approval to the project (in this case that would be the Planning Commission) . He mentioned that the Historic Preservation Commission staff was advised by Planning Commission staff that there was no need for Historic Preservation Commission staff to attend the meeting. Commissioner Preston felt that the Planning Commission was not clear on what connection there was between the. mitigation measures and the project. He commented further that he would like to see a policy set up between the Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission that they would continue an Historic Preservation Commission item until a Historic Preservation Commissioner or staff member can be present. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, suggested forming a subcommittee between the two Commissions. Commissioner Preston expressed his concern that the Historic Preservation Commission needs to determine how they wish to support the Council on the issue at the August 21, 1991 meeting. Commissioner Haskvitz suggested sending a letter to the Planning Commissioners asking what their rationale was behind their decision. Commissioner Preston suggested calling them on the phone instead because he felt a direct approach would be better and asked which of the Commissioners had been in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Hartig commented that the Commissioners present at the Planning Commission meeting were McNiel, Tolstoy, Melcher, and Chitiea. The Commission reached a consensus to have Chairman Schmidt and Commissioner Preston represent the Commission in the proposed formation of the joint Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Commission subcommittee. The Historic Preservation Commission also gave their concurrence approving the letter from Chairman Schmidt to Mayor Stout. HPC MINUTES - 2 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 NEW BUSINESS C. UPDATE ON SANTA FE DEPOT FIRE Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner, presented C presented the staff report. Commissioner Banks asked ec sr a emo i ion ' lroad depot will have on Rancho Cucamonga's prospects of getting a mass-transit railroad stop. Mr. Henderson responded that the Santa Fe Railroad and San Bernardino County have been unable to reach an agreement on the purchase of the Santa Fe line so a decision cannot be made regarding a stop in the City. Commissioner Banks inquired if there was any portion of the building that could be salvaged and moved. Mr. Henderson responded no and stated the best method to proceed would be to rebuild from the original plans, if they are available. MOTION: Moved by Haskvitz, seconded by Schmidt, carried unanimously 7-0-0, to to mitigate the demolition request of the Santa Fe depot and require a HABS/HAER quality documentation of the depot. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BILLINGS, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried DIRECTOR'S REPORTS D. REVIEW OF IN-HOUSE CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW POLICY - Oral Report Ms. Hartig presented the oral staff report. She updated the Commission on the Cultural Resource training program that she presented to the Planning staff. She indicated that the main goal of the program is to involve the Planners in the cultural resource process at the time they accept a project for environmental review. The Planners would also require a deposit from the applicant to cover the costs of a preservation consultant to compile a report detailing the project's impact on cultural resources, if such a report were determined necessary by staff. COMMISSION BUSINESS Chairman Schmidt brought up the Founder's Day Parade to see if the Commission had any interest in participating. The Commission discussed a few ideas but the consensus was that they were not interested in participating this year. HPC MINUTES - 3 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 E. STATUS OF DEMOLITION REQUEST FOR THE LaFOURCADE BUILDING LOCATED AT 11871 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 229-011-10 - Oral Report Ms. Hartig presented the oral staff report. She explained that demolition of the structure has been requested and that a request has been made by the City Manager's office to have the public hearing on this issue at the Historic Preservation Commission adjourned meeting on August 27, 1991. Commissioner Banks expressed that she felt the issue could wait until their regular meeting of September 5, 1991 . She was concerned because she would not be able to attend the meeting if it is on August 27, 1991 . She also expressed her feeling that the public hearing advertisement should cover all the potential decisions the Historic Preservation Commission could make regarding the structure (including Historic Landmark, Point of Interest or mitigation measures) . Ms. Hartig indicated that the initial review of the building does not appear to meet the Commission's standards for a Landmark designation because the structure has been altered several times. Commissioner Preston suggested wording for the public hearing notice that included a range of alternatives and also stated he would like to advertise public hearings this way in the future. MOTION: Moved by Banks, -seconded by Preston, unanimously carried 7-0-0, to hold a public hearing regarding the LaFourcade building at their regular meeting on September 5, 1991, and the public hearing advertisement should generally read as follows: The purpose of the Public Hearing is to determine the Historic status and level of appropriate mitigations for the structure and that range of alternatives may include the following: Landmark status, Point of Interest status, and and/or mitigation measures prior to demolition. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BILLINGS, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried F. NATIONAL TRUST CONFERENCE (October 16-20 in San Francisco) - Oral Report Ms. Hartig mentioned the National Trust Conference is to be held in San Francisco, October 16-20, and asked if any of the Commissioners were interested in attending. She stated that there was enough money in the budget for two Commissioners to attend or one Commissioner and one staff member. Commissioner Banks expressed her interest in attending the conference and commented that she felt it was important for a staff member to attend also. HPC MINUTES - 4 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 Commissioner Cooper concurred that it was important for a staff member to attend. MOTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Banks, carried unanimously 7-0-0, to send one Commissioner and one staff member to the National Trust Conference. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried G. UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 EXTENSION EIR/EIS AND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL MEETING - Oral Report A copy of the Environment Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) was passed out to the Commission. Ms. Hartig discussed the draft EIR/EIS document and went over the dates for the public meetings as well as the Commission and Council meetings that must take place prior to the September 15, 1991 response deadline. She mentioned that a letter would be mailed to the property owners affected by the Route 30 Extension informing them of the meetings and also encouraging them to apply for Landmark designations for their property. Ms. Hartig explained that only the properties of National Register quality were addressed by the EIR/EIS; other properties of local significance were not addressed in the document. She commented that the City's response will include mitigations for each of the 16 properties that will be affected, not just the 5 that are of National quality. The Commission concurred their approval to send the letter to the affected property owners. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman Schmidt announced that the Fontana Historic Preservation Commission held its first meeting and John Anicic was named chairman of the commission. Commissioner Preston asked that a letter of congratulations be sent to Mr. Anicic. Mr. Henderson informed the Commission that the County was very interested in artifacts from the Thomas Winery for their new winery center at Guasti Park. Mr. Henderson informed the Commission that the Stoebe house has been in probate for approximately two years and the outcome of that situation should HPC MINUTES - 5 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 be resolved at the end of August. Cleanup should commence shortly thereafter. PUBLIC COMMENTS No additional public comments. ADJOURNMENT The Historic Preservation Commission adjourned to a special meeting on Tuesday, August 27, 1991 , at 7:00 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, Shelley A. Petrelli Secretary HPC MINUTES - 6 - AUGUST 1 , 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Cor.rission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CHANGE OF THE HISTORIC STATUS AND APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OR LANDMARK DESIGNATION FILED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, CONSIDERATION OF A DEMOLITION REQUEST BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND THE POSSIBLE ESTABLISHMENT OF MITIGATION MEASURES THEREIN FOR THE LA FOURCADE BUILDING LOCATED AT 11871 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 229-011-10 - Consideration and determination of the historic status, application for Point. of Interest or Landmark Designation, and level of appropriate mitigations for the demolition of the structure. The range of alternatives may include the following: Landmark status, Point of Interest status, and/or mitigation measures prior to demolition. I i BACKGROUND: On July 20, 1991 , Jack Masi and his representatives requested the demolition of a building historically known as the La Fourcade Store, located at 11871 Foothill Boulevard. On August 21 , 1991, the Masi family successfully removed the structure's most recent occupant, the Cowgirl Theatre. Masi Commerce Center Partners has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow 280,857 square feet of mixed use new construction on a 27-acre site that includes this parcel. The CUP application however, is not yet complete. The Masi submittal includes proposed light industrial, multi-tenant commercial, religious, restaurant, financial, convenience and automotive uses. At the August 1, 1991 meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission requested that the property be reviewed to determine its significance in response to the demolition request (the landmark application is included as Exhibit "HPC-1" ) . This review of the La Fourcade Store's demolition request is a part of the environmental assessment for such a project, as required under the California Environmental Quality Act. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The structure lies at the southwest corner parcel formed by the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Covering close to an acre, the parcel is 158 feet wide and 259 feet deep (see Exhibit "HPC-2" for site plan and zoning) . A HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 2 B. Site Land Use, Zoning, and Industrial Specific Plan and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Designations : Per the Industrial Specific Plan, the southern side of the Foothill/Rochester intersection is zoned for future Industrial Park use. The recent "Missing Link" supplement to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan includes policies for this intersection, and specifies a future Activity Center for this acreage. Such centers are defined as unifying nodes of concentrated activity along the Foothill Boulevard corridor that "give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located" (Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, page 4, Exhibit "HPC-3" ) . New construction proposals, per the Supplement, shall take into consideration a pedestrian scale when determining setbacks, first floor facade treatment, and building height, as well as incorporating the style of existing structures like the Agazzotti Winery at the intersection's southeast corner. C. Surrounding Land Uses, Zoning, and Industrial Specific Plan, Terra Vista Community Plan, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Designations : North - Per the Terra Vista Community Plan, the land directly north of Foothill Boulevard is zoned for mixed use future development combining commercial, office, and medium-high density residential uses. The northeast corner of Foothill and Rochester is zoned Office/Professional. South - The proposed City Sports Park is planned south of the project site and is in a General Industrial zoned area. West/East - As with the subject property, the parcels lying to the west and to the east (from east of Haven Avenue to Day Creek Channel) are currently zoned Industrial Park per the Industrial Specific Plan. D. Architectural Description and Building Chronology (refer to Exhibit "HPC-4" for an evolutionary sketch of the site) : As it stands, the structure is an irregularly shaped, single-story compilation of at least five different additions to the original building. The oldest portions of the site, as shown on the 1929 Sandborne Maps of the area, include this main structure of stucco-covered brick or 3-inch block with a wood-framed extension along its west side and southwest corner; one small, square brick/block structure located close to the southeast corner of the main building; and one wood- framed square shed located closer to Orange (now Rochester) Avenue (refer to Exhibit "HPC-5" ) . The shed is no longer standing and the small brick storage building has been altered beyond recognition. The main structure, however, retains some original elements despite numerous alterations. From a 1922 photograph, staff has gleaned that the general store structure extended only four bays in length A HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 3 and that a highly decorated porte cochere extended from the northeast of the store forming the space f or a gas station (f or historic photographs, see Exhibit "HPC-6" ) . Both the canopy and the main store building were characterized by deck (or flat hipped) roof constructions topped by regularly laid, straight barrel mission tile. By the drawing of the Sandborne Maps, seven years after the structure's construction, it seems that the gas station canopy had been removed. Portions of the parapet and cluster of columns which accentuated the canopy appear to have been salvaged and reused on the existing north facade. This restructuring accounts for the unusual decorative treatment that characterizes the building today, that of an applied if fanciful combination of Spanish eclectic, and French chateauesque trim to the parapeted entry and squared pilasters dividing the main facade's bays. The large storefront windows along the northern face are now covered and since accessing the structure's interior has not yet been possible, it is difficult to discern their original appearance. After reviewing the San Bernardino County building and assessment records, it seems that a series of new buildings and additions from the 1950s to the 1970s eventually formed the irregular massing of the site as we know it today. The store was expanded and the column treatment and roof line of the original building extended to the west and a concrete block garage was added to the southwest corner in 1952. In 1966, the storage structure to the south was enlarged and altered significantly to join the main building and four years later a tall, square "smoke room" was added to serve the restaurants needs. Shortly thereafter in 1972, a single storied, wood-framed and stucco finished structure was completed along the rear of the store/restaurant which connected the garage to the west. and the storage unit to the east. In the mid 1970s as well, the shed addition covered with board and batten and shingled siding was built. ANALYSIS: A. Historical Background: Built as the La Fourcade Store and Gas Station, the subject structure continued to house businesses which served important community needs. First associated with the extensive viniculture enterprise of the John B. La Fourcade family and then with the grape growing and mercantile efforts of the Masi family, the structure also operated as the restaurant RoVal's, which was a local attraction along Route 66. The story of John La Fourcade represents an important link in the early history of the Cucamonga region. Migrating at the age of seventeen from La Houtan, France, the young man arrived in Pomona in the early 1890s, according to a 1922 Colton Daily Courier article. Along with the likes of Klusman, Garrett, Haven, and Milliken, La Fourcade accepted the challenges posed by the harsh HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 4 climate and embarked on a wine and raisin manufacturing venture, owning 800 acres in our Rochester area. At first transporting water from the above canyons, La Fourcade later drilled the area's deepest well at 630 feet from which he ran pipe across 460 acres at the purported cost of $33,000. Embarking on an ambitious construction project, La fourcade hired the San Bernardino-based designer and architect J. N. Robinson and from 1918 to 1922 had constructed bunk-like housing (for his permanent labor force composed primarily of single Mexican men) , wine manufacturing and storage buildings, company offices, a wagon repair shop, and a structure used for box making and packing, as well as the company store and local gas station. It was reported that La Fourcade was a fair and honest if ambitious man. The passage of Prohibition and the effects of World War II spurred the demise of the La Fourcade enterprise, and the family left the area in the early 1940s. Not much is known about the Huber family who owned the southwest corner of the Foothill/Rochester intersection from 1931 to 1942, but the Sebastian Masi family began renting the property upon their arrival in the area. Like La Fourcade before, the newly immigrated Italian family strove for success and by 1943 was able to purchase the site. Efforts to continue operating a grocery store were undertaken by the Masis and Jennie Masi in particular, and the family established themselves in the historic fabric of this region. B. Facts for Findings: Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding: The proposed Landmark/Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned and/or important. Fact: John B. La Fourcade established an advanced, extensive, and elaborate winemaking and grape handling business in an era marked by failed attempts at such endeavors in the Rochester/Cucamonga area. Well known throughout the County, La Fourcade represents an important epoch and entrepreneurial spirit of this valley. Finding: The architect or builder was important. Fact: In choosing J. N. Johnson to design and construct his winery complex, La Fourcade was one of few local property owners in the late teens-early 1920s to employ such a contractor like Johnson who was well known in the County. Johnson constructed many large public and private buildings in San Bernardino, Redlands, and Colton. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 5 Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding: The construction materials used in this proposed Landmark/Point of Interest are unusual and significant. Fact: Although altered, the main entrance of the building-- marked by a parapet and flanked with Corinthian pilasters--remains as a testament to an entire design palate created by La Fourcade and Johnson unique to this area. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and City. Fact: As a gas station, store, and restaurant, the subject structure stands as a 70-year-old fixture in the community's landscape. C. Issues : The Masi family and their representatives request the immediate demolition of the La Fourcade Store. There also exists a desire to remove the building because of its recent use as a road house/topless bar. This demolition permit has been requested separately, but the structure's proposed destruction would normally be tied to the proposed Masi Commerce Center development. Case law pertaining to what is known as "splitting" a project under CEQA has created a significance preference for reviewing the potential negative effects of a proposed project with the project itself. Understanding this, staff has reviewed the included information about the Masi project in this report. To properly review this demolition request per CEQA, it needs to be treated as a project unto its own, requiring a separate environmental assessment. This report both makes the case for a Point of Interest Designation to be placed on the property and details a mitigation package for the loss of the La Fourcade Store if the demolition request is granted. After the Commission's review of this package, in the form of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, it will be forwarded to City Council. As the structure stands as the sole remaining testament to an early and successful agricultural enterprise and other entrepreneurial efforts, it is thus important to adequately address and mitigate its proposed demolition. The future incorporation of unique design elements and the creation of meaningful interpretations of the site's history will ensure the retention of the site's sense of time and place. While the above efforts touch upon some aspects of the site's significance, greater funding to the City' s Oral History Program and the agricultural museum to be housed in the Chaffey- Garcia House barn would further reinforce and with probably greater permanence preserve the winemaking legacy of the region. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 6 Another impact to the property will stem from the widening of Foothill Boulevard to its ultimate width. Such a project would align the most northern edge of the building with the curb edge (see Exhibit HPC-8) and thus create a significant impact on the resource. ' D. Environmental Assessment: Any future landmark designation would be exempt from CEQA under Article 19, Section 15380. If properly mitigated for, the demolition of the La Fourcade Store would not require any further environmental review and staff would then recommend the issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Proposed mitigations are listed in the Recommendation section of this report. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, property owners within 300 feet of the project site have been notified, and staff has inspected the property. The property owners are aware of this review process and were sent a copy of this staff report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that although altered, the La Fourcade Store is worthy of a local landmark designation. Due to these alterations and previously expressed owner objections to the retention and landmarking of the structure, staff recommends that the Commission forward an Historic Point of Interest designation to the City Council. The following related mitigation measures are recommended to ease the impact of the proposed demolition of the site and would accompany a Negative Declaration issued for the proposed demolition. 1 . No demolition permits shall be issued for the existing structures prior to the property owner's written acknowledgment and acceptance of the Cultural Resource Mitigation Measures per the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. The development of the site shall incorporate details of the site's history, in particular the La Fourcade period, through the incorporation of the following measures: commissioned public art and development and placement of interpretive public displays. The final specifications of such measures shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and forwarded with a recommendation to the Planning Commission during development/design review hearings on any development proposal for this site. Final approval of the appropriate public art and interpretive displays shall occur prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The decorative parapet at the northeast corner of the building dating from the La Fourcade period shall be removed during demolition and be examined by a structural engineering consultant hired by the owner and approved by the City Planner to determine the possibility of its reuse. City staff shall be present during this demolition to inspect the parapet. If HPC STAFF REPORT LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE BUILDING September 5, 1991 Page 7 after examination restoration proves feasible, the parapet element shall be considered for incorporation into the above public art or interpretive exhibit. If the reuse of this element is not feasible, it shall be documented per HABS/HAER standards, the final form of which shall be approved by the City Planner. 4. The developer shall contribute $25,000 to the Chaffey Garcia House Barn project, which will be used to develop a museum/cultural center depicting and exhibiting the agricultural heritage of the area. The City Council may allocate these funds to another similar type of preservation project depending upon the timing of the compliance with this mitigation. This contribution shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits of any phase of the Masi Commerce Center. 5. The site developer shall sponsor four Oral History interviews of individuals knowledgeable of the La Fourcade/Masi era of significance. These interviews, which shall not exceed a cost of $5,000, shall be conducted by a consultant approved by City staff. Respectfully submitted, 1 . A Larry J. ;enderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Landmark/Point of Interest Application Exhibit "2" - Site Plan and Zoning Exhibit "3" - "Missing Link" Text Exhibit "4" - Evolution of Buildings Exhibit "5" - Sandborne Maps, 1929 Exhibit "6" - Historic Photographs Exhibit "7" - List of Sources Exhibit 118" - Proposed Ultimate Right of Way of Approval Photographs Resolution City of Rancho i.ucamonga Application for HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION Historic Landmark X Historic Point of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1. Common Name: Cowgirl Theatre 2. Historic Name, if known: LaFourcade Store 3. Street or Rural Address: 11871 Foothill Blvd. City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 County: San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. L29-O11-10 Zone: Industrial Park Legal Description: Rochester E 239 FT N 158 FT Lot 17 4. Present Owner, if known: Jack Masi Address: 5416 Electric Ave. City:San Bernardino Zip: 92407 Ownership is: public private X S. Present Use: None Original Use:Store & filling station Other past uses: Restaurant, bar, roadhouse DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: Please see attached j f 4 7. Location sketch map (draw & label 8. Approximate prop y size: site and surrounding streets, Lot Size (in feet) roads, and prominent landmarks): Frontage 239 Depth5F— or approx. acreage 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent b. Good c. Fair X d. Deteriorated L e. No longer in existence 10. Is the feature: a. Altered? X b. Unaltered? / 11. Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land X •���Y� b. Residential • c. Scattered buildings X d. Densely built-up e. Commercial G� f. Industrial g. Other 12. Threats to Site: a. None known b. Private development X c. Zoning d. Public Works Project e. Vandalism f. Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) 7/91 NOTE: The following ( Items 14-19) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone b. Brick X C. Stucco X d. Adobe e. Wood X f. Other 15. Is the Structure: a. On its original site? yes b. Moved? c. Unknown? 16. Year of Initial Construction: 1920 This Date is: a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Architect (if known): J.N. Johnson & J.B. LaFourcade 18. Builder (if known): J.N. Johnson 19. Related Features: a. Barn b. Carriage house c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) e. Formal Garden(s) f. Windmill g. Watertower/tankhouse h. Other i. None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): Please see attached. 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one) : a. Architecture b. Arts k Leisure c. Economic/Industrial X d. Government e. Exploration/Settlement f. Military g. Religion h. Social/Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, ppersonal interviews and their dates: Brown & Boyd History of San Bernardino & ;Riverside Counties, 1922• Clucas, LiahZ-Ovpr the Mountain, 1974; Praone Directory 1928/1931. 23. Date form prepared 8/28/91 Ry'(name) :. AntYhea �Uarti.q Address: 10500 Civic Center Dr. City: Rancho Gt.Lc1p11gaZi� 91730 Phone: (714) 989-1861 Organizationsi'tY 'of 'Rancho Cucamonqa City Use Only Continuation Sheets LaFourcade Store Section 6. Physical Appearance: As it stands, the structure is an irregularly shaped, single storied compilation of at least five different additions to the original, building. The oldest portions of the site, as shown on the 1929 Sandborne Maps of the area, include this main structure of stucco-covered brick or 3" block with a wooden-framed extension along its west side and southwest corner; one small, square brick/block structure located close to the southeast corner of the main building; and one wooden-framed square shed located closer to Orange (now Rochester) Avenue. The shed is no longer standing and the small brick storage building has been altered beyond recognition. The main structure, however, retains some original elements despite numerous alterations. From a 1922 photograph, staff has gleaned that the general store structure extended only four bays in length and that a highly decorated porte cochere extended from the northeast of the store forming the space for a filling station. Both the canopy and the main store building were characterized by deck or flat hipped roof constructions topped by regularly laid straight barrel mission tile. By the drawing of the Sandborne Maps seven years after the structure's construction, it seems that the gas station canopy had been removed. Portions of the parapet and cluster of columns which accentuated the canopy appear to have been salvaged and reused on the existing north facade. This restructuring account for the unusual decorative treatment that characterizes the building today, that of an applied if fanciful combination of mission revival, spanish eclectic, and french chateauesque trim to the parapeted entry and squared pilasters dividing the main facade's bays. The large storefront windows along the northern face are now covered and since accessing the structure's interior has not been possible, it is difficult to discern their original appearance. After reviewing the San Bernardino County building and assessment records, it seems that a series of new buildings and additions from the 1950s to the 1970s eventually formed the irregular massing of the site as we know it today. The store was expanded and the column treatment and roof line of the original extended to the west and a concrete block garage was added to the southwest corner in 1952. In 1966 the storage structure to the south was enlarged and altered significantly to join the main building and four years later a tall, square "smoke room" was added to serve the restaurant's needs. Shortly thereafter in 1972 a single storied, wood-framed and stucco finished structure was completed along the rear of the store/restaurant which connected the garage to the west and the storage unit to the east. In the mid- -t 0' /fes- 16 1970s as well the shed addition covered with board and batten and shingled siding was built. Section 20, Significance: Built as the La Fourcade Store and Filling Station, the subject structure continued to house businesses which served important community needs. First associated with the extensive viniculture enterprise of the John B. La Fourcade family and then with the grape growing and mercantile efforts of the Masi family, the structure also operated as the restaurant RoVal's which was a local attraction along Route 66. The story of John La Fourcade represents an important link in the early history of the Cucamonga region. Migrating at the age of seventeen from La Houtan, France, the young man arrived in Pomona in the early 1890s, according to a 1922 Daily Colton Courier article. Along with the likes of Klusman, Garrett, Haven, and Milliken, La Fourcade accepted the challenges posed by the harsh climactic characteristics and embarked on a wine and raisin manufacturing venture. At first transporting water from the above canyons, La Fourcade later drilled the area's deepest well at 630' from which he ran pipe across 460 acres at the purported cost of $33,000. Embarking on an ambitious construction project, La Fourcade hired the San Bernardino-based designer and architect J. N. Robinson and from 1918 to 1922 had constructed bunk-like housing for his permanent labor force composed primarily of single Mexican men, wine manufacturing and storage buildings, company offices, a wagon repair shop, and a structure used for box making and packing as well as the company store and local filling station. It was reported that La Fourcade was a fair and honest if ambitious man. The passage of Prohibition and the effects of WWII spurred the demise of the La Fourcade enterprise, and the family left the area in the early 1940s. Not much is known about the Huber family who owned the southwest corner of the Foothill/Rochester intersection, but the Sebastian Masi family began renting the property upon their arrival in the area. Like La Fourcade before them, the newly-emigrated Italian family strove for success and by 1943 was able to purchase the site. Efforts to continue operating a grocery store were undertaken by the Masis, and Jennie Masi in particular, and the family established themselves in the historic fabric of the this region. b N =mss 7- � :�a31uOM AS"QM PISoH Ulu jo V /Vl. JL 1, 2 C m OZl b 4 I � 1 L �aozj •.x . � h���� I III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as'Theme"or staters nt"areas which"tie' together the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the city, promote concentrated activity at these areas,and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located.The activity centers are located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in Figure 2. ACTIVITY CENTERS ri o �y W W W Z Z W W W < Y N S W U O IM Figure 2-Activity Center Locations Because three comers of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partially developed,the devel- oprnent provisions of the activity center are limited to those streetscape and landscape improvements within the public right-of-way.Therefore,many of the following standards apply only to the Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue activity centers: 1. Streetscape: a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage.The building setback areas will be enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials,formal landscape arrange- ments,and pedestrian level lighting. b. 5treetscape elements such as bollards,crosswalks with special paving materials,light standards,and street furniture should be uniform throughout the Foothill Boulevard corridor. C. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal,regularly spaced, street tree planting system utilizing a palette of informally shaped,colorful trees. d. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/intersecting streets to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway.Typically,the design will extend to at least the first driveway or as modified through the design review process.The extent of the urban s"vetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right- of-way conditions,such as right tum lanes and bus bays. 34AW EYENTPM Page 4 7A V onga Item: Ion Title:1/�'ll�' /Vii tzNf:r Tt�Cl Exhibit: Scale: /Sl t Q � �9tob (,. 19 2o G.�9fvfv 190 19�2 c. 19�� ITEM: Lir 1V URC. C 5`Cb -F— Lys c c onga TITLE: EI N Ion E?CHrBFr WT,'4SCALE: IAJ Ewe c.,eOPIe 201 1 A ifrnwocaof d s E amr9r%-X 1»4Vrw 57AW"W.rt' rte.• daR46f F, MfIt4 M. roo'r►uti st'vb � G�f%1J�e�- s�blC1�-/��D�l`lC.�. -� Goix�l�c Ong& Item: C•,� ULtRf UE S'[�RE ter on Tluct:,�PWAD NMI �t: a u: N . m +✓. �"_: '�, �` r� Y 3�' i' r'�L�"�.' Jnr .� AUX r V311 • , w/� i r I r , � a•„r,3QM 44 a r > .; t � .S'I =• fig" 8 jX Ks v r} I � i � i- tip � � • � � ���� — fill LIST OF SOURCES Brown, James and James Boyd, History of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Chicago: Lewis Publishing Co., 1922. Clucas, Donald, Light over the Mountain: A History of the Rancho Cucamonga Area. Upland: California Family House Publishers, 1974. Day, Lawrence, "Story of a Successful Man: Improves Land and Section about with Buildings and Store for the Neighborhood," Colton Daily Courier. October 30, 1922. Cucamonga Phone Directories, 1928/1931. ITEM: ! Rx�-RC.B►L�E s'[DRE City i c c on`a TLE: GIST Er SbUpxE$ N IT Hh' on EXHIBIT:Hlr.,-gSCALE: 1A pc 1208.* 2:- X � 1 z--z w 1.209.4 X X 1208.7 pp x l ' 0 \ jS 1200 1200 LU Z t ; i I v .,�. -t6irT CF WA "*y ofItnch*,cnca.Vmonga Item:L a Fo u r c a d e Bldg. HUtoslc Presftvation Title:Demolition Request N F�hibit. - Scald" = 4W HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: I (.[M l AP# ZZ 9 o 1 — 10 .......... View Looking SOGCT1 Date of Photo View Looking t4DR" A Date of Photo 91 y •may"� n r fd. i •• .� MET. • 141 . t" fi n �4 �r r ` z . rs Lx a �-�� t o--''� - ff ,s HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: �7( TT I LL 1 � AP# S Z 9—Dt i — 1 D i* f Y I e ' J Fit { View Looking 1"� Date of Photo 'q �f 9 j t Irk r View Looking SOLA-P14 Date of Photo 3D 9'I `3 THSTORIC PRESERVAnON • 1 • Address: AP# FF r View •• -S-MME Date of • + _I HISTORI PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARKSURVEY Address: 91671 rnm W %[1\4tv. Ap# 011- 10 - �� �< \ i\ « d: - �< w y �«. \ View Looking Date of Photo Wd.91 �-�� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: � 1 ll�t-.- AP# 2Z9 nl l -• 10 AlL [F4V View Looking Date of Photo 3O 9 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK POINT OF INTEREST 91-02 TO DESIGNATE THE LA FOURCADE STORE LOCATED AT 11871 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS A POINT OF INTEREST AND LANDMARK CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE - APN: 229-011-10. A. Recitals. (i) The City has filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as the "application." (ii) On September 5, 1991, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 1 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester (Orange) Avenue intersection. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 5, 1991, including written staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding: 1. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality. Fact/s: John B. La Fourcade established an advanced and elaborate winemaking and grape handling business in an era marked by failed attempts at such endeavors in the Rochester/Cucamonga area. Seemingly well known throughout the County, La Fourcade represents an important epoch and entrepreneurial spirit of this valley. HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE STORE September 5, 1991 Page 2 Finding: 2. The architect or builder was important. Fact/s: In choosing J. N. Johnson to design and construct his winery complex, La Fourcade was one of few local property owners in the late teens-early 1920's to employ such a contractor like Johnson who wall well known in the County. Johnson constructed many large and impressive public and private buildings in San Bernardino, Redlands, and Colton. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding: 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. Fact/s: Although altered, the main entrance of the building, marked by a parapet and flanked with Corinthian pilasters, remains as a testament to an. design palate created by La Fourcade and Johnson which was unique to This area. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: 1. The .proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Fact/s: As a gas station, store, and restaurant, the subject structure stands as a 70-year-old notable fixture in the community's landscape. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to This Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 5, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to the Commission policy regarding landmark designation over an owner's objection, This Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: 5. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California environmental Quality Act of 1970. If properly mitigated for, the requested demolition of the La Fourcade Store would not require further environmental review and a mitigated Negative Declaration would be issued for such demolition. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 ,2, 3, and 4 above, This Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE STORE September 5, 1991 Page 3 5th day of September 1991, of Landmark Application 91-02 for a Point of Interest designation for the La Fourcade Store. The Commission further recommends the following conditions of approval, mitigating for the requested demolition: a. No demolition permits shall be issued for the existing structures prior to the property owner's written acknowledgment and acceptance of the Cultural Resource Mitigation Measures per the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The development of the site shall incorporate details of the site's history, in particular the La Fourcade period, through the incorporation of the following measures: commissioned public art and development and placement of interpretive public displays. The final specifications of such measures shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and forwarded with a recommendation to the Planning Commission during development/design review hearings on any development proposal for this site. Final approval of the appropriate public art and interpretive displays shall occur prior to the issuance of building permits. C. The decorative parapet at the northeast corner of the building dating from the La Fourcade period shall be removed during demolition and be examined by a structural engineering consultant hired by the owner and approved by the City Planner to determine the possibility of its reuse. City staff shall be present during this demolition to inspect the parapet. If after examination restoration proves feasible, the parapet element shall be considered for incorporation into the above public art or interpretive exhibit. If the reuse of this element is not feasible, it shall be documented per HABS/HAER standards, the final form of which shall be approved by the City Planner. d. The developer shall contribute $25,000 to the Chaffey Garcia House Barn project, which will be used to develop a museum/cultural center depicting and exhibiting the agricultural heritage of the area. The City Council may allocate these funds to another similar type of preservation project depending upon the timing of the compliance with this mitigation. This contribution shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits of any phase of the Masi Commerce Center. e. The site developer shall sponsor four Oral History interviews of individuals knowledgeable of the La Fourcade/Masi era of significance. These interviews, which shall not exceed a cost of $5,000, shall be conducted by a consultant approved by City staff. HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 91-02 - LA FOURCADE STORE September 5, 1991 Page 4 7. The Chairman of This Commission shall certify to the adoption of This Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. BY: Bob Schmidt, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - - Ci CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September S, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Letter in support of Formation of Inland Empire Coalition of the California Humanities Council The Commission has been asked to support a grant application to the California Council for the Humanities that would fund the formation of an Inland Empire Humanities Coalition. Such a loose-knit but formalized confederation of organizations and institutions would plan and carry out humanities activities aimed at reaching a broad range of individuals in our region. One of the major emphases of the Council's programming lies in creative outreach efforts in history, and preservation works well within the organization's defined goals. This request stems from the work that Anthea and many others completed on the "Longing for Community" series of discussion groups in the late spring of this year. Associate Director for the Council, Dr. Susan Gordon, wrote to staff directly requesting this kind of support . we ask that you please review and approve the forwarding of the attached letter to the Humanities Council. Thank you. Attachments: Letter from Susan Gordon to Anthea Hartig Draft Letter to the Humanities Council CALIFORNIA 315 W Ninth Street • COUNCIL Suite 1103 FOR THE Los Angeies HUMANITIES CA 90015 — RECEIVED — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 213;623.594ANNING DIVISION AN AUG 46 1991 August 2, 1991 Dear �. ! The summer is slipping by, and we've yet to schedule a follow-up meeting to assess our efforts on the "Longing for Community" activity and to talk about what next steps might be possible or appropriate for continuing to create humanities programs in the Riverside/San Bernardino area. I would very much like to meet with all of you and get your ideas about the past and future! With the American Renaissance Chautauqua coming to Riverside at the end of August, I think it best to wait until September. 1 have talked with Gloria Harrison, and she will find us a meeting place at San Bernardino Valley College. The date, if enough of you can make it, is September 13th, at 9:30 a.m. I will send you a confirmation of time, place, and date towards the end of August. One important thing I 'd like to suggest you come prepared to discuss is the idea of applying to CCH at the October 1 deadline to request $10,000 to develop an Inland Empire humanities coalition, a loose-knit but formalized confederation of your organizations and institutions (much like our "longing" committee) that is willing to plan and carry out humanities activities (some with additional programmatic grants from CCH, others with grants from other organizations, if necessary) . The $10,000 is a development grant and could pay for someone's time to take on the bulk of the coordination, plus some money for a few meetings, address list, calendar/newsletter, and/or information about sharable institutional resources or even to do an area survey of the kinds of programs and themes that might be of interest to people in the two-county area. These are only a few ideas. You probably can come up with more interesting ones. The main thing to keep in mind is not that we're trying to create still another institutional structure that requires massive funding and time commitments, but that we are seeking a way to maintain the wonderful cooperation and contacts that were established over the past year and a half and find ways to generate more collaborative humanities projects in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The grant needs to be submitted by October 1. Awards are made by mid- December. It would be helpful if each of you would take a look at the enclosed proposal form and come prepared with some ideas for what you'd like to see be the direction of a coalition and any points of information that you think should be worked into the proposal that one of you will write (I 'll be happy to advise / closely). Any letters that you can bring from your organizations on letterhead stating the in r support of the organ zation or institution i.n seein e formaTization of such an on-going human es coalition would be appropriate. Since ep s onTy two weeks It roe the die—OTT—no, KaUng T goodporti on of the letters and resumes ready will be an enormous help. JAMES QUAY 2 Executive Director SUSAN GORDON Associate Director I think the two components of the meeting--evaluation and deciding what' s next--go hand in hand. We need to know what we did that was effective and not- so-effective, and how to do things better, in order to determine where we should go from here. We reached a larger and more diverse number of people over the course of the "Longing for Community" and the American Renaissance Chautauqua activities than through any other CCH efforts in my memory of working with CCH. The involvement of individuals and organizations not usually reached by humanities councils is a major accomplishment that you all made happen. That kind of response confirms my belief that with programs designed to be accessible to the public, the humanities can attract and speak to the concerns of a broad range of that public. Because our work of the last year has been so successful in reaching lots of people, I am hopeful that you, too, will see the need to continue working to provide high quality, broadly based programs that nourish people' s desire to reflect on and exchange ideas, talk about literature, phi1osophy, and history and share stimulating insights with each other. Some of the reading groups had contentious meetings, nevertheless the fairness of the forums was never in question. Even the Jefferson/Jenkinson lecture "rattled some cages," inspiring several rather excitable reactions. That people took the time to respond so vociferously means we touched some important nerves! My feeling is that it would, be a pity to let the momentum fade away. It seems apparent to me that a great many people in the Riverside/San Bernardino area can be attracted to this kind of programming--the "life of the mind" needs care and feeding and public humanities programs can help fill some of those needs. I miss you all and hope you can come to the meeting on September 13th. Do try to make it to some or all of the American Renaissance Chautauqua on August 22-25. I saw the program in Nebraska and know that Riverside is in for a treat! Sincerely, Susan J. Gordon, Ph. D. Associate Director o n Op Cl o � p a O tf C, 0 u "My question id: .fre tut meiring e+e imimett" September 5, 1991 Dr. James Quay, Director 312 Sutter Street, Suite 601 San Francisco, CA 94108 Dear Dr. Quay: On behalf of my fellow members serving on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Historic Preservation Commission, I write in support of the formation of an Inland Empire Humanities Coalition. You will be reviewing an application for a grant to develop such a confederation, and we encourage you to understand the importance of bringing humanities-based programming and outreach efforts to our area. The need to inspire a great range of diverse cultural, ethnic, and socio-economic community groups to share in engaging discourse is perhaps nowhere more critical as it is in this, one of the fastest growing regions in the country. Believing in the importance of promoting humanities stewardship and programming, we also feel that the opportunities for community outreach and professional organization afforded by such a developmental grant are crucial. The quality and kind of efforts sponsored by the Humanities Council were evident in the recent and highly successful "Longing for Community" discussion group series that brought together a broad range of organizers as well as a diverse body of participants. That this series captured the minds and spirits of hundreds if not thousands of area individuals gives us hope and confidence that these kinds of efforts will meet with success in the future. We believe in an emphasis on the teachings, interpretations, and inspiration derived from an understanding of the humanities and encourage you to embrace the efforts of this local group of organizers. Thank you for your consideration. very Sincerely, Bob Schmidt, Chairman Historic Preservation Commission copy: Dr. Susan Gordon, Associate Director 315 W. Ninth Street, Suite 1103 Los Angeles, CA 90015 D-4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 6, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission i FROM: J Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR LANDMARK STATUS SUBMITTED FOR THE GALLEANO HOME AND WINERY IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY We have been asked by Charlene and Donald Galleano to lend our support to their efforts in receiving a landmark designation for their family home and winery. The Riverside County Historical Commission will be reviewing the Galleano application at their September 18, 1991 meeting. Clustered along Wineville Road in the Mira Loma area, the . winery continues to operate as well as to farm all of the remaining wine- producing acres ( 1500) in the Cucamonga/Guasti region. The Galleanos own and run the only small, family winery in our area that once supported many such enterprises. The County of Riverside has planned for the eventual widening of Wireville Road from the two-lane, eucalyptus-lined drive it is now t(- a four lane primary road with a median. Such a widening would require the taking of most of the winery structures and come within ten feet of the family home that is approximately 90 years of age. Although listed on the County Inventory of 1984, the Galleano structures were not included in the environmental. assessment completed for the development project with which the road widening is associated. Due to the established historic connection between the Galleanos and the Hofers, Bianes, DiAmbrosios, and other vinicultural families, staff feels it may be appropriate to support not only a proper review of our region's cultural resources but efforts to protect and landmark such sites. Attached is a brief narrative and magazine article supplied by the Galleanos that provide some background data on the history of their family home. Because this request from the Galleano's is beyond the City Historic Preservation Commission's normal sphere of activity, staff urges the Commission to carefully consider whether such a response is appropriate. If the Commission determines a response is needed, a draft response letter is attached for consideration. Attachments: Draft Response Letter Exhibit A - Brief Narrative Galleano Winery Exhibit B - News Article T H September 6, 1991 William Jennings, Chairman Riverside County Historical Commission c/o Riverside County Park Department P.O. Box 3507 Riverside, CA 92509 Dear Mr. Jennings and Members of the Commission: On behalf of my fellow members serving on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Historic Preservation Commission, I write in support of the recognition of the Galleano Home and Winery as an important regional resource. You will be reviewing an application for such a designation soon, and we encourage you to understand the significance of the property to the vinicultural history of the valley. In an era marked by therapid disappearance of grape cultivation, the Galleano site thrives as an important cultural, historic and architectural resource. We encourage you to review carefully the Galleano application in your roles as stewards of history. As one of the oldest land grants in the area, the site represents a significant continuum of agricultural development. As third generation winemakers, farmers, and community leaders, the Galleano family and their winery and home remain a critical link to the- region's development. The proposed threat to Riverside county's resource stemming from the widening of Wineville Road should also be carefully reviewed. CEQA empowers local agencies to mitigate for any potential impacts on important community resources resulting from project's like the Hayes' submittal. We support the forwarding of an affirmative recommendation for the designation of the Galleano Home and Winery as a County Landmark and State Point of Interest to the Board of Supervisors. Very Sincerely, Bob Schmidt Chairman, Historic Preservation Commission BS:ds Mayor Dennis L Stout 1^' Councilmember Diane Williams Mayor Pro-Tem William J Alexander Councilmember Pamela J Wright Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Charles J Buquet I 3500 C,,ic Center Drive PC Box 807 0 Cucamonga. CA 91729 0 (71.4)989-1851 -A GALLEANO WINERY The rural setting of the Galleano family winery , located in Mira Loma ' s Wineville area , is still much the same as it was in 1933 when Domenico Galleano founded the winery following repeal of Prohibition . The winery is located at the southern fringe of the Cucamonga Valley , made famous for winegrowing by Secondo Guasti , who like Domenico came from northern Italy ' s Piemonte region . Piemonte means foot of the mountains and would be appropriate to Cuca- monga , an alluvial plain that sweeps down from the eastern reaches of the San Gabriel Mountains . Towering eucalyptus trees , planted to slow the winds that still whip through "wind country" , flank Wineville Road and there are still vineyards there although many gave way to dairies a gen- eration ago . Domenico , enticed by good land , economic independence and stable politics , emigrated with his wife , Lucia , to the U . S . in 1913 . They settled in Los Angeles , where a son , Bernard (affectionately called Nino) , was born and then in 1918 the Galleanos joined the George Borra family in purchasing the Bonita Ranch located in the Chino-Ontario area . The Borra family was to later move on to San Diego County where they founded the Escondido Wincry . Domenico was joined by brothers Angelo and John and through hard work they prospered , investing in several small parcels of real estate . In 1927 , Domenico and Lucia , having added a daughter , Madalenna , Vurchased the property the winery now stands on frdm Ana D. Cantu . The Cantus figure prominently in Mexican history , Col . Estaban Cantu , Ana ' s husband , served as governor of Baja California from 1917 to 1920 . The Cantu ranch contained a residence , some farm buildings and a vineyard . Domenico , with a team of mules and a Fresno earth- scraper , made the vineyards prosper . He expanded the land in vineyards by burying vine cutting and other scrap vegetation in the hollows carved by the wind and then having the mules drag a covering of sand from the dunes . He sold grapes to other immigrants who prided themselves in making their own wines and in his cellar produced wine for the family table. In spite of repealing Prohibition and obtaining a beverage "man- ufactor" permit in 1933 times were tough because the nation had plunged into the Great Depersion . During that time of despair , the Galleanos became noted for their hospitality - a good table prepared by Lucia and good wine produced by Domenico . ExHi6iT A . t .ffl� z Page 2 - Galleano Winery About this time , Nino graduated from Chaffey High School but he had already served an apprenticeship in the wine industry before and after school and during the summer . He could manage the wine-making process from the cultivation of the grapes through the production of wine - dry table wine for the immigrants , fortified products for the domestic market . Domenico quickly turned more of the duties over to Nino and pur- sued those pleasures forgone during the lean years -- hunting , fishing and travel . Under Nino ' s leadership the winery outgrew the cellar , under Domenico ' s house , and the farm building that served as the retail store . In 1947 the winery moved accross the street and in 1964 expanded again . The current capacity is 310 , 000 gallons of cooperage . While the winery was expanding , the valley around it was changing . Vineyards were giving way to other land uses . Most notable was the erection of a Kaiser steel plant on what had been 2 , 000 acres of vineyards . Over 20 years , thousands of acres of vineyards went out of production and numerous wineries that had contrib-uted to Cucamonga ' s recognition as wine country closed down . In 1982 Nino Galleano died at the age of 69 and within a year , perhaps affected by the loss of his only son , Domenico followed . The Galleano tradition of fine table wines patterned after those of the Piemont region of Italy is now carried on by Donald Galleano . Donald is the only child of Nino and Mary Galleano . He cultivates 425 acres of vineyards in scattered parcels that have so far es- caped the eastward spread of urban sprawl and industry . In 1982 he rehabilitated the old Cantu house , from an employees ' home to its original grandeur with hardwood floors and antiqued interior . Galleano Winery is the Oldest and only remaining winery in Western Riverside County . Donald is determined to keep alive the Galleano tradition of warm hospitality and fine winemaking . `A day without wine is like a day without sunshine' J � y Welcome to the Galleano Winery where three generations of my family have been making wines in traditional Italian style from grapes we have grown here in the great Cucamonga Valley. My grandfather, Domenico Galleano, now 96, first began supervising grape harvests in these vineyards in 1918 when there were more than a dozen wineries located within a 7-mile radius of our winery. In 1913 at the age of 25, Domenico immigrated to the United States from his birthplace in Magliano Alpi, a village between Genoa and Torino in the French Alps in northern Italy. He brought with him a tradition of Italian wine-making that had been passed down to him by his father. In 1929 Domenico planted his first grapes in this region, variously known as Mountain View, Stalder and later Wineville. However,, Prohibition stili was in effect and It wasn't until 1933 following repeal of the 18th amendment that our winery opened. Initially, barrels of wine were stored and aged in the cellar of Domenico's house, where I and my family now reside. In those days customers brought their own jugs to be filled with wines from our barrels. Since then the generations-old practice of handing down the wine-making tradition from father to son has continued from Domenico to his son, and my late father, Bernard "Nino," and to myself. Today, we are proud to be one of the few remaining wineries in the Cucamonga Valley still producing wines from grapes grown in our own vineyards. Our winery's 310,000 gallons of wine still are aged in giant Redwood and American Oak barrels first assembled and used more than 50 years ago by my grandfather. During your visit to our winery today, feel free to browse about the complex, looking at the many antique implements we have preserved and experiencing some of the heritage that is so rapidly disap- pearing from Southern California. And, be sure to taste and enjoy some of our many fine wines. Donald D. Galleano EXM1g1't � DINING _June 1990 HERITAGE, f LEGACY AND k WINE APPRECIATION . ,By Don Galleano ,. arsons of European heritage, to whom wine is as essential an element of the .� meal as bread, have long appreciated the Cucamonga Valley's bounty. During Prohibition when persons were X �s� allowed to make wine for home consump- tion, immigrants and their offspring in a-e- Detroit, Chicago, New York and states in between,met the trains bringing the valued ./ Zinfandel grapes from Cucamonga vineyards to their family and friends who would enjoy the wine as part of the celebration of the ! meal Since Secundo Guasti pioneered wine- grape growing in the Cucamonga plains,the h .► area has been famed for its hardy Zinfandels ' ? and later for Grenache and Mourvedre, Rhone-style grapes that a tta in character not ! f because of the environment but in spite of it—inadequate rainfall,heat,soils hostile to many crops,and unusual growing conditions. There are a number of grape varieties many northern California wineries. Sutter Many wine-producing families earned grown here that are in high demand by some Home and Berringer are buttwo examples of renown in the Cucamonga Valley. They of the most respected wineries in the state, familiar producers whose products you will were as recognized in midwest and eastern including Napa, Sonoma and Coastal find on many retailers' shelves. cities as in Los Angeles. Among them were Producers. In the past, those wineries, along with the Aggozottis,Opicts,Guastis,Vies,Gallos, The majority of vineyards presently farmed others, have purchased Zinfandel to meet Pias,Bianes,Filippis,Guideras,Accomozzoa, here are head pruned (free-standing), dry the demand forthe extremely popular White Marriettas, Allenas, Tudors, Marmarccos, farmed,low producing varietals such as the Zinfandel. This year,many have concluded sin well as my own grandfather, Domenico much acclaimed Zinfandel, Gr$nache and that this area's premium Zinfandel crop will Galleano, whose legacy for fine wine I am Mourvedre(more popularly called matero). be even better suited for traditional Zinfan- proud to have inherited. White varieties such as the Muscat of del—deep raspberry in color,full of character He came from Italy's Piedmonte area to Alexandria and the Burger are but two ex- and flavor, and with a big finish. the Cucamonga Valley in 1918. He settled amples of local grapes used in premium there from his native Mondovi with the Champagne production. The local Mission Domenico Galleano knowledge he learned from generations of grape is well suited for excellent sherries. winegrowers, working with the noble red Philo Biane still produces some of the finest came to the grapes Nebbolo and Dolcetto. sherry in the state. Today,only the Galleano and Filippi win-. We are involved locally in sales of various Cucamonga Valley eries remain as family enterprises although forms—grapes,grape juice and bulk-finished some wineries continue to use the familiar wine,as well as a full line of premium award- In 1918 . . . with the family name. For example, the largest pro- winning wines available at our tasting room knowledge he learned ducer of wines and purchaser of many local on Wineville Road, between Milliken and g grapes is the old Regina Winery. The winery Etiwanda, south of the 60 Freeway. from generations of is now owned by the conglomerate Nabisco. Producers of Rhone-style wines such flA It was formerly family-owned by the Allen& Randall Grahm of the renowned Bonny Doon winegrowers. family. Much of the harvest they purchase is Vineyards in Santa Cruz have recognized processed into cooking wine and red and the high quality of grapes grown here whose The history of our people and grapes is an white vinegar. origins can be traced back to the Rhone rich fls local property values. My family has Because of the non-wine use to which Valley of France. The Cucamonga Valley been involved in that history and is very much of the local harvest is put.one might shares similar climatic conditions and the proud of the fact that we are still active in the conclude that local grapes are inferior when Grensche and Mourvedre produce wine of dAV-to-day cultivation,harvest And proress- allowed to age into wine. History shows like character and quality. ing;of Cucamonga grapes--grapes that still otherwise. Our Zinfandel has been sought after by produce wines that speak for themselves.0 EJX11 %1%JT 15 INLAND EMPIRE 53