The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986/09/04 - Agenda Packet 'HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION U ' Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancbo Cucamon¢la, California Thursday, September 4 , 1986 7:00 t.m. 1, CALL TO ORDER A. Pledoe of Allegiance tc Flag. B. Roll Call: At-her ___, BankS , Billings , Coorer __, Scbmidt __., Stature __ and Strane C. ApFrova] of r. liDutes: August 7, ]986 2 · ANNOUNCEMKNTS 3, COM/~ISSION ITEMS ' A.Receipt oi City Planagers Memo 4, STAFF REPORTS A. Personnel Practices Related to Hjstoric Snrvey B. Sta~.f Report on Historic Trust Fund (Time Pennittinfl) 5. PUBLIC COMMf.~NT 6 · ADJOURNMENT To Joint [.~eeting WitL PlanninQ Cc~nmiss;jon r!i nu tea Rancbo Cucamonga Historic Preservation Cc~mmissicn ~ugust 7, 1986 Regular l'4eetin9 Neeti~g was called to oreer by Chairman Arner at 7:04 ~:.m. Pledqe of Allegiance was ]eC by Chairr.~am ~rner. Present were Commissioners ~rner, Banks, Bi]lincgs, Coe[~er, Schmidt. Stature. (~bsent: Strane) ~iinutes o± July 3, 1986, Regular Neetinq ~ere revjewe6. ~ction: Move~! by Scbmi6t, seconded by Banks, tF;at minutes July 3, 1986. Regular .~.eetinq, k-le approvec~ as submittee. Notion carried: 6-0-1 (Allsent: Strane). C(',M~iI SSION ITFjMS: Staff tel,or-ted tt~at a joint meeting) between the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission has been scheduled lot September 4 at [~:6i0 p.m. The meeting v,i]] conclude at 9:00 t:..m. The purpose cf this meeting will be tc discuss general riannincZ .procedures and how they cad reldte tc historic preservation efforts. Commissioner Banks submitted the agenda she bad proposed for the joint meeting. Commission reviewed the AgeD6a items and agreed on the topics let eiscussiop.. Commission members discussed the ieasibility of becomminc.4 more closely related to the Planniz~g bivisior,. Stai~ sugcjeste(] t]~at it the Commission felt they could bett~r serve the neeas c,r the community hy using- Planning Division Stari instea~ of Co~nmunity Services Department Staff for suy, port, they cculo suggest this change to the City ColL~mcil. S~'~.FF REPORTS: Cit~ Engineer, L]oyO Hubbs was t:resent and reviev~ed the results of the recently constr1~cted stone curb and guttel in front the Charley Garcia ~cuse. He e~l:laineo that Council authorize0. $25,C, 00 lor rock curb restoration this iiscal year. He F:resented the Ireposed resolL, tion establishinc~ tolicies rock curb !-~reseIvation aDc~ imyrovement. Commissioner Banks snbmitteo a resol~ition iron the ~.tiwanoa Pistcrical Society reqr..esting that iunding Lot curb restoration be t~rioritizeC to be useo first ~or the extension el the rock curb north to the Pacific Railroad tracks. Commissioner Banks also requesteO that gutters ~,e e~tanded to two feet ior next test sj, te. t.',lr. ~ubbs stated that more variec sizes of rcck:s wcu]_~ be used in the next test area. The varied sizes may introduce ~i~iezent colors. into tl~e curl,s. _.iDUteS ~UgUSt 7, 1986 Psge 2 Motion: ~.loveO by Banks, seconded by Schmiot, that tbe Council be requested to e~do.pt the Resolution add Standards [.~reFared anc3 submitted Dy the City Engineer, ~]otioD carrieo. ADJOURNDIEN'i' Chairman ~rner adjourned. the ~eeting at 8:C~5 Res[.ectfu] ]y Sbbmitted by: Bea Smiderle, Community Services Department HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMiSSiON Lions Park Corm.unity Center 9161 base Line Road Rancho Cucaroncja, Calitornia 1 bursday, Se[~ten.ber 4, 1986 7:00 ~ .n,. 1. CALL lO ORDER PleaWe ot Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Arner , ~',anks , billings , Coo[~er , SC~F,,idt , blsac.r, and Strane C. A~Froval ot ~linutes: August 7, 1986 2. ANNUbN~jEhEN1S 3. CU~!I~ISSIUN I1EhS A. Receipt of City Fmnac~ers ~!eF,,O 4. S1AFF REP{JR1S ~. Personnel Practices Relatee to historic Surve~ B. Start Report on historic lrust Fund (lir:,e Perr!,ittin~) 5. PUBLIC COh~E~tl 6. AUJUURN~EN1 lo Joint ~!eeting ~.dth Planning Comr,ission CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA c~c-~Mo~c~ MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1986 1977 TO: Bill Holley, Community Service Director FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planne~ SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 4TH JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION On Friday, August 22nd, I met with Dennis Stout, Planning Commission Chairman, and Marsha Banks, Historic Preservation Commission member. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the tentative agenda for the September 4th joint meeting. It was agreed that the meeting would begin around 8:00 p.m., or as soon as the Design Review Committee meeting concluded that same night. It was also understood that we would allocate approximately one hour for this meeting. This is the suggested outl i ne: I. Introductions II. Review of Ordinance 70 and the Recently Compiled Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest Booklet I I I. Development Review Process A. Current Development Review Process B. Brief Look Back 1. The Virginia Dare Project 2. Victoria Avenue Trees/Morman Church C. Current Projects 1. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 2. Archibald Beautification Program IV. Commmon Goal s A. General P1 an B. Development Code C. Specific Plans V. Conclusion - Discussion on Future Coordination of Our Common Goal s I hope the above agenda assists you in preparing the formal agenda for the September 4th j oi nt meeting. My understanding i s that your commission has already received a copy of the Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest booklet, therefore, the only other attachment I believe is necessary to this agenda would be a copy of Ordinance 70. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance as you prepare the fi hal agenda. BB:jr AGENDA Joint Meeting Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Thursday, September 4, 1986 7:30 p.m. I. Roll Call: Barker , Chitea , McNiel , Stout , Arner , Banks , Billings ', Cooper , Schmidt , Stamm , Strane II. Review of Ordinance 70 Review of Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest III. Development Review Process A. Current Development Review Process B. Past Projects 1. Virginia Dare 2. Victoria Avenue T,rees C. Current Projects 1. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 2. Archibald Avenue Beautification Program IV. Common Goals A. General Plan B. Development Code C. Specific Plans V. Coordination of Common Goals VI. Adjournment CITY OF ~ ~ ~CE ~CUTrNG SLrP Mayor Cc~mlnity Development r For your information City Council Administration t Return wi[h reccrmendaticn City Attorney Building & Safety Per your request City Clerk ' Engineering Please post City Manager ~ Planning For your approval City Treasurer ~ Ccrimunity Services For distribution Administrative Services Personnel [ For City Council agenda Finance ~ Police ~~ File Business Licenses '~ Prepare report Purchasing -- Prepare draft and return Stores . I ' Prepare for my signature Reproduce copies ~ ' Return by CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1986 1977 TO: Bill Holley, Community Service Director FROM: Brad Buller, City Planne~' SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 4TH JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION On Friday, August 22rid, I met with Dennis Stout, Planning Commission Chairman, and Marsha Banks, Historic Preservation Commission member. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the tentative agenda for the September 4th joint meeting. It was agreed that the meeting would begin around 8:00 p.m., or as soon as the Design Review Committee meeting concluded that same night. It was also understood that we would allocate approximately one hour for this meeting. This is the suggested outl i ne: I. Introductions II. Review of Ordinance 70 and the Recently Compiled Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest Booklet I I I. Development Review Process A. Current Development Review Process B. Brief Look Back 1. The Virginia Dare Project 2. Victoria Avenue Trees/Morman Church C. Current Projects 1. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 2. Archibald Beautification Program IV. Commmon Goal s A. General P1 an B. Development Code C. Specific Plans V. Concl usi on - Di scussi on on Future Coordi nati on of Our Common Goal s I hope the above agenda assists you in preparing the formal agenda for the September 4th joint meetin9. My understanding is that your commission has already received a copy of the Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest booklet, therefore, the only other attachment I believe is necessary to this agenda would be a copy of Ordinance 70. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance as you prepare the final agenda. BB:jr y Minutes Rancho Ct~caFK~rl~sa tii sto ric Preservation COF~Pi ssion August 7, ].9~ ReSular ~ieetinb ~,eetin9 ~.~?as calleO to order by [hairF. an/'~rner at 7:b~ i-r.!. Call to Order P'lee~e ot Alle~jiahce was led bj' Chairl. an/~rrler. Pledge of Allegience Present ~ere (~o~m:issioners Arner, ~ar~ks, ~;il'lin~s, CooFer, Roll Call Sch~idt, Stamr. (~bsent: Strand) ~'~in~es of dul~ 3, 1~.,, Regular F~ee~in~ were reviewed. Minutes 7/3/86 F~otion: I,,oveo b~ ~c:h~,idt, sec:onee~ b~ banks, that Finu~es ot July' 3. 19~(~. Re~u'lar I~,eetinS. be aFi..r~ved as subl;.itted. r.:otior~ carried: 6-0-1 (Absent: Strand). Cu~?I,1SSiUN llEF:S: Start reFor'tea that a joint Peer inS hetv,,eer~ the tlistoric Joint Meeting kr'eservatior~ Cop.i.:ission and the Plantains Cor..r~:ission I~as been HPC-PC scheduled tor SeFter~ber z~ at ~:~:O0 F.r?.. lhe I~:eetinS will conclude at 9:0U p.r'~. lhe pur~>ose o1' this r~,eetinS wil'i te to diSCUSS Sener'al F'lar~pint~ l>roceoures and hov~ ~hey can re'late historic Freservation ettor"ts. Cor,r,issioner ~anks SUbr~it~eo the aSenda she had Fro~;osed for' the Ooir~t meeting. Comr.:ission r'evieweo the ASenda iter,.s ano agr'eed on the topics ~or' discussion. Cor.r.i ssion Pel"~ber soi SCbSSeO tl,e l'easibil ity oT [:ecOl:I~inS closely related to the PlanninS i:iivision. Start sI,E~Sested that it tF~ commissior~ l'elt tl,eJ, cnuld better' serve the necos oT the coFr:,ur~ity by usin5 PlanninS Division Statl insteao of Cor~:r..unit)' Ser'vi ces DeFa rti~er~t Start 1-or suFFor't, the~ coul o suggest tl~is chanSe to the Cit~, Cobr~cil. S1FFF kLkOklS: Cit> [.ngineer. Lloyd t~ubbs ~.as [~resent and r'evie~.red tt,e results Rock Curbs ot the r'ecent/~ cor~structed s~or~e curb anc~ Sutter in tr'ont ot Etiwanda Ave. the Chatte~ Ear'cia house. F-~e explained that Cour~ci'l has authorized $2b.OOU tor rock curb rest. oration this fiscal 3;~ar. he pr'esente<i the Fr'oposec; r'esolutior~ estab/ishir~S Fol icies to~ rock curb preservation and il~2rovei~en~. Cor..p,issioner kanks subr~.itted a resolution trot the Etiwanca historical Society requestinS that tur~dir~5 tor curb restoration be t~rior'itized to be used tirst Tor the cxter~sion o1' ~he curb north to the PaciTic Railroad tracks. Co~.pissioner banks also requesteo ~hat Sutters be exFanded to ~wo Teet tot nex~ test site. r,r. ~ub~s stated that r;:or'e varied sizes ot rocks v,~oul d be used in the r~ext test area. 'lhe varied sizes introouce ditterent co'lor's irato the cur'~s. ii,otion: Fioveci by b:anks, secondleG Ly 5chr. jGt, tlat the Council be rec~uested to adopt the Resol utio, and Stanc!ards prej:,are{~ ant~ subFitteo by the Cit.~.' EPcjineeF. ~.~otioP carrice'. T\[iJOURI~4NEN1 Adjournment Chai rrFian Ar'per' adjourned the Respecttul 'l ~, 5ubl}.itte~ L-:.ea Sp~i de ri e, Cor~Punit~ Services L)e~.,a ~CA~ '--' -~ "HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - L977 Lions Park Co~nur~it~ (.er~ter' 9l(,1 Base Lithe Poad F:ancro Ci,caronta, Ca'l itornia 1 ~,ur'sda3.. Se[.tel bet zl, 7:30 l, .r,. 2. hhNUbl'~ljEFiLl~l b 3. (jO~I!t~ilbSIUN liLNb P. Peceipt oT C. ity ~,a~waters 4. S1/~FL REPORI5 h. Per'son.el Practices Related to t.istoric b. Start Rei:ort on t~istoric ~rust Ltmci ('ti[+ Per[dttin~) b. PtJBLIC C(jkF!kr-ll 6. /~DJUORNrtlzi~I ]0 doint ~{,etinS E!ith Planniri~j Com~ issior~ CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 22, 1986 ~" TO: Historic Preservation Commission Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manag During my rec t t Commission discussed future staff needs for the Historic Preservation function. It appears that there is some sentiment to switch the staffing for the Historic Preservation Commission from Community Services, where it has been handled since incorporation, to the Planning staff. It is my preference that the staffing remain as it currently exists, with Community Services providing the primary staff support and Planning staff being available on an "as needed basis" to assist the Commission. The reasoning is based primarily on the fact that the staffing has, in my view, been adequately handled by the Community Services staff. If that level of commitment needs to be increased, Mr. Holley will bring the issue to my attention at the appropriate time when we are reviewing budgetary needs. The decision is also based upon a preference by the Cit7 Manager that we not overload the Planning staff. To change the staffing from Community Services to the Planning Division would, in my view, adversely affect other planning activities which are of equal importance to the City. You have my assurance, as well as a commitment from the City Council, that Historic Preservation activities are a vital part of our City responsibilities. If we find that staffing is inadequate for that purpose, it is an issue which will be discussed by the Director of Community Services during the budget cycle. From a more practical view, as you are undoubtedly aware, because of the size of our Community Development staff, we receive a great deal of criticism that we are "over staffed"- That is another reason for leaving the Historic Preservation Commission with the Community Services Department rather than the Planning Division. If the Historic Preservation Commission would like to discuss this issue personally with me, I would be pleased to attend a future meeting to relay my concerns personally to each of you as well as to hear your views concerning Historic Preservation in our community. Please let me know if you would like me to be in attendance at a future meeting. LMW/kep