Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-086 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 94-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, D~2LARING ITS ~ON TO LEVY AND OOTZ.mCT ASSESSMenTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINT~NAN~ DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, ~DR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 ~ TO THE IANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PIACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamor~, pursuant to the provisions of the ~ping ar~ Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work: S~CTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1994/95 for the maintenance and operation of t_hose street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for c~,,,~n purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract mp within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work: S~TION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of Assessment Districts: S~CTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain '9~ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, '~4ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", '9~ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", '94ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", '~ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", '9~ap of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said city. ~solution No. 94-086 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment Report of Engineer: S~ION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. ~mference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING: S~CTION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIW~ THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SO{EDULFD IN THECIVIC C~D~ROOUNCILCHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC C~H~RDRIVE, CITY OF RANC~O~, CATJFORNIA, 91730. W~DNESDAY, JUNE 1, 1994, AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND~TL PERSONS MAYAPPEARAND SHOW CAUSEWHY SAID MAINT~NANCEAND S~VICE FOR THEEXISTINGIMPROV~4~fSANDTHEPROPOSED~OV~M~qTSSHOULDNOTBEDONE OR CARRLED OUT OR WHY ASS~ SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND (2~OT~,~ FOR FISCALYEAR1994/95 ~MUSTBE IN WRITINGANDMUST(I)NTAINA DES(IRIPTION OF THE PROPERI~f IN WHIC~ EAC~ SIGNER THEREOF IS ]~REgI~D, SUFFICI~qT TO ID~FCIFY THE SAME, AND MUSTBE Dk~.~V~.~EDTOTHE CITY cLk~KOFSAIDCITYPRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO ~PROTESTS OR OBJ]DCI~ONS W~z. BE OONSIDER~D. IF THE SIGNER OFANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST ~/kLIZ~D ASSESSMENT ROLL SU(~ PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACf/DMPANI~D BY ~ EVID~CETHAT SU(~SIGNERISTHE~OFTHEPRDPERTY SO DESCRIB~D. Lazldscap~~Lightir~jALUc of 1972: S~CTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways code of the State of California. Publication of Rmsolution of Intention: SECTION 7 Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Resolution No. 94-086 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVfD, and ADOPIti) this 4th day of May, 1994. Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams None None AYES: NOES: ABSm~: Dennis L Stout, Mayor City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLFRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of May, 1994. Executed this 5thday of May, 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Resol~ion No. 94-086 Page4 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. 0 N~J/C£ty Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 94J95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 6 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $17,200.00 $1,000.00 $ 4,120.00 $269,780.00 $292,100.00 $123,790.00 $56,870.00 $180,660.~) $472,760.00 <$41,080.00> $431,680.00 Analysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased. 22.37 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. That is the same rate as FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! and Use Type Unils Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 3769.26 $17.77 2 $35.54 $133,960.00 Single Family Parcel 16,754 $17.77 1 $17.77 $297.720.00 Total $431,680.00 R~-solution No. 94-086 Page 7 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 8 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 6.94AU MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 20.74AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 3.0AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU - 2AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU R~solution No. 94-086 Page 9 L.AN--ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I;)SCAPE MAINTENANCE, DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET lIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ~%Ni) 6" .. CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~,~,.~ Resolution No. 94-086 Page 10 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 3 LEG[NO ,/TT~, DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DENOTES STREET LIGHT' SCALE i', SO' :.....~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF ~AN BERNARDINO ~, u ~?~ 8 · .1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ex ~e~'r "A" R~solution No. 94-086 Page 11 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L. ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 10807 .JERSEY BI,VI), SC, AkA: I"z .. CITY OF RANCHO OUOAMONGA' ~-~~. ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO C~ ';. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,.,,,:, Resolution No. 94-086 Page 12 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGR'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 'I AND 6 i. -- $T4q4~T " CITY 011 RANCHO CUCAUQNGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ 92-'G? Resolution No. 94-086 Page 13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTIqICT NO. STREET I. IGHTING MAINTENANCE O~STIqlCT NOS. 1 AND 2 L · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~~~~. ~ COUNTY O1~ SAN BERNARDINO ~~ ' -i STATE OF CALIIfOI~INIA Resolution No. 94-086 Page 14 AENV1RONMENTAL HIGHTECH ENGINEERING ~z~.A-no~ Resolution No. 94-086 Page 15 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J.(.OrNeil, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~ound: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. · Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. 'l'he normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights wiff become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for $LD #2 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 17 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994J95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: -v,,,tal Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 Distr~ct Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: 0 $2,570.00 $206,030.00 $208,600.00 $50,670.00 $19,1(K).00 $69,770.00 $278,370.00 <$18,500.00> $259,860.00 Anallysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 are not recommended to be increased. district. FY 94]95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. This is the same rate as FY 93/94. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~ Use Type Units Rate Facinr A.U. Commercial Acre 249.65 $39.97 2 $79.94 Single Family Parcel 6002.00 $39.97 1 $39.97 Total The Revenue $19,960.00 $239.900.00 $259,860.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 18 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 19 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU - 2AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU LEGEND EXHIBIT 'A' Resolution No. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 Z 3 DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIl. DENOTES STREET LIGHT 94-086 Page 20 SGAL. K I'- 80' CITY OF RANCHO OUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM 11738 EXHiBiT "A" R~solution No. 94-086 Page 21 ASSESSMENT .OIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTlIIIC.r NO. S.rREE.r LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D~S'rlIIIC.r NOS. 1 AND 2 ~...~~/~..OITY Oil RANC~HO OUCAMONGA' OOUNTY OIIr SAN BERNARDINO · .i STATE OII r,,ALIIIORNiA . Resolution No. 94-086 Page 22 AENVIRONMENTAL iIIGHTECH ENGINEERING Sen Resolution No. 94-086 Page 23 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. O't',ra4'l, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 24 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~ound: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Eliwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The norma~ process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights wi!! become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 25 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/04 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,810.00 $146.660.00 $148,470.00 $34,560.00 $8,480.00 $43,040.00 $191,510.00 <$4,630.00> $186,880.00 Analysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $47.15 This is the same rate as FY 93/94. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ 1 ,and Use Type Units Ram Fac~nr A.U. Commercial Acre 35.29 $47.15 2 $94.30 Single Family Parcel 3893.00 $47.15 1 $47.15 Total The Revenue $3,328.00 $183.550.00 $186,880.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 26 EI t VON¥1qlt~ 1 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 27 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994 / 95 William J. 0 NIeflT, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 28 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94795 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Backg~'ound: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 29 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $19,140.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $840.00 $49,890.00 $ 84,870.00 $19,010.00 $3.260.00 $22,270.00 $107,140.(X) <$13,510.00> $93,630.00 Analysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 will remain at $28.96 per year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $28.96. This is the same as the rate for FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 785.58 $28.96 2 $57.92 $45,500.00 Single Family Parcel 1,662.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $48.130.00 Total $93,630.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 30 ResolutionNo. 94-086 Page 31 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. O'l~il, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Baclr,~round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereoO on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The cosIs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Prqjected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 33 Proposed Maintenance Budl~et for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $4,080.00 $1,510.00 $12,780.00 $0.00 $490.00 $27.330.00 $46,190.00 $9,170.00 $26,280.00 $35,450.00 $81,640.00 <$41,120.00> $40,520.00 Anallysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget and no new assessment units have been annexed into the district. It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased. FY 94/95Assessn~ent Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. This is the same as the rate for FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! and Use Type Units Rate Fac~r A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1.171.00 $34.60 1 $34.60 $40.520.00 To ta I 1,171.00 $40,520.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 34 C I I Resolution No. 94-086 Page 35 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. O'~6il, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl~ffround: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $33,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 37 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Maintenance & Operations Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Less: Total Revenue Required: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $8,380.00 $2,500.00 $6,580.00 $490.00 $33,980.00 $51,930.tX) $5,860.00 $7,410.00 $13,270.00 $65,200.00 <$10.460.00> $54,740.(X1 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommenced to increase. 15.34 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $51.40. This is the same as the rate of FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~ Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue lndstrial/Comm. Acre 1064.91 $51.40 1 $51.40 $54.740.00 Total $54,740.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 38 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 39 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #6 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5AU ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM~..~ozut:ton .o. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NO. 3 ~ 40 STREET UGHTING' MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NOS. I~ND 6 ' · CITY OF RANCHO CUr, AMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~,.,.,~/~/~/~ Resolution No. 94-086 Page 41 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI.STRICT NOS. 1 ~ND 6 I JERSEY' ikVl:). j SC;A&g: CITY OF RANCHO CUC:AMQNGA' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 94-086 Page 42 EXHIBIT 'A· ASSESSMENT DIAGR'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 --I t · . $~T'~: -- ~. ~,., '%',~%. -'"., .,.... ~ Pc,. 2 ,, ,, Per. ~.Z,I m~. 2.133 ~ ~4FTll '' ~¥/qEET CITY O1' RANCHO CUCAMQNGA · COUNTY O1' SAN BERNARDINO sTAr. o...o,,..A ~7 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 43 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994 / 95 Approved: William J. 0 l~l~'City'Engineer Resolution No. 94-086 Page 44 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 94,/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Coats: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 45 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $5,590.00 $20O.OO $1,370.00 $180.00 $11,770.(g) $19,110.00 $4,810.00 $9.670.00 $14,480.00 $33,590.00 <$13.000.00> $20,590.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommended to increase. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessn~ent Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 93/94 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~ Use Type Unils Rate FaCtnr A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 618.00 $33.32 I $33.32 $20.590.00 Total 618.00 $20,590.00 Resolution No. 94-086 Page 46 R~solution No. 94-086 Page 47 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. (X]Wteil, City Engineer ~solution No. 94-086 Page 48 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). I~ack~round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs~ The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-086 Page 49 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $130.00 $0.00 $50.00 $3.860.00 $4,040.00 $710.00 $6,390.00 $7,100.00 $11,140.00 <$4.160.00> $6,980.00 Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased. No new units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $193.75. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel 36.00 $193.75 1 $193.75 Total 36.00 Revenue $6,980.00 $6,980.00 r Resolution No. 94-086 Page 50