The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About93-049 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 93-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF R/{E CITY OF RAN~O CU~GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PdDQUES~ FOR AD3USTMEN~ TO CONDITIONS OF APPRDVAL FOR TfIgTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13808 AND C.U.P. 90-42 IN THE VICIORIA PLANNED ~, IDCAT~) SOUTH OF ~LL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF DAY CRk~K BOULSVARD - APN 229-021-10, 15, 19 AND 28 A. Recitals (i) Hughes Investments has filed an application for Tentative Parcel Map 13808 and C.U.P. 90-42 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in the Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map and C.U.P. request is referredto as the "Application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, the Planning C~m~ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolutions No. 91-108 and 91-109 thereby conditionally approving said Application. (iii) Hughes Investments has submitted a request for adjustment to said conditions as authorized by said conditions. (iv) Said request is for adjustment to the following conditions: Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard full width from Rochester Avenue to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping shall be constructed along the south side of the street from the centerline of Day Creek Channel to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and may be deferred for the remaining portion of the street until development of the adjacent property. The limits of the off-site improvements may be reduced if approved by the City Council. (v) The adjustment being proposed is as follows: Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard as follows: a) Full improvements, including sidewalk and parkway landscaping, on the south side from the centerline of Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek Boulevard (including curb return at the southeast corner of the intersection). b) c) Street paving, curb and gutter on the south side from Day Creek Boulevard easterly to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping on the south side from Day Creek Boulevard easterly to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor. Resolution No. 93-049 Page 2 d) A landscaped median from the centerline of Day Creek Channel easterly to Route 15. e) Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median from Day Creek Channel easterly to Route 15. (vi) On March 17, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on the Application and request and concluded said hearing on that date. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced March 17, 1993, hearing, including written staff report, and the contents of Planning Co~ut,~ssion Resolutions No. 91-108 and 91- 109, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. The parcel is presently vacant; and (b) Approval of said request for adjustment to said condition is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City for development along Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced hearing including written staff report, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the request to adjust said conditions under Engineering Division Planning Co~l-~ssion Resolutions No. 91-108 and 91-109 be approved and modified as follows: Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard as follows: a) Full improvements, including sidewalk and parkway landscaping, on the south side from the centerline of Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek Boulevard. b) Street paving, curb and gutter on the south side from Day Creek Boulevard easterly to Route 15. Resolution No. 93-049 Page 3 c) Sidewalk and parkway landscaping on the south side frc~ Day Creek Boulevard easterly to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor. d) A landscaped median fr~m the centerline of Day Creek Channel easterly to RDute 15. e) Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median from Day Creek Channel easterly to Route 15. 4. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Hughes Investments at the address identified in City records. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 1993. Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None v is L Stout, Mayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CV.MRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of March, 1993. Executed this 18th day of March, 1993, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. City Clerk Resolution No. 93-049 Page 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~m~NG D~ON I 7 ! N ~ VI£1NIT¥ Mt~P tl Resolution No. 93-049 Page 5 Ce CIT7 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERIIIG DIVISION VICTORIA PLANlIED C01~IUNITY VICTORIA LAKES AREA STREET II~ROVD~k'T II~LF.~ErATIOR POLICY Proposed Developments shall construct street improvements as follows: A. Streets adjacent to or required of projects shall be constructed full width to include curb on both sides of the street. Streets shall be extended (full width) off-site to an existing public street(s) in order to provide two separate mean of access. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of off-site improvements from future Development of the adjacent property upon its development. Projects within the Areas shown on the map below (left) shall construct the specific street segments designated below (right): LEGEND m Area Boundary I Area N~er AREA ! STREET SEGMENT Base Line Rd. - Day Creek Channel to Day Creek Blvd. Day Creek Blvd. - Base Line Rd. to Foothill Blvd. Church St. - Rochester Ave. to Day Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd. - Day Creek Channel to Etiwanda Ave. Day Creek Blvd. - Same as Area 1. Miller Ave. -Oay Creek Blvd. to Etiwanda Ave. Miller Ave. - Same as Area 2. Day Creek Blvd. - Same as Area 1. Foothill Blvd. - Day Creek Blvd. to Rte. 15 Church St. - Same as Area 1. Church St. - S~me as Ar~a 1. Day Creek Blvd.- Same as Area 1. Foothill Blvd. - Rochester Ave. to Day Creek Blvd. Foothill Blvd. - Rochester Ave. to Rte. 15. Day Creek Blvd. - Foothill Blvd. southerly through curve. Bullet Way - Day Creek Blvd. curve to Rochester. ' 'City ~glneer Date Resolution No. 93-049 Page 6 DEVEL. OPME:NT & ACQUISITION OF COMII4rRclAL pROPWRTiICS RECEIVED VIA OVRRNIGH~ JAN e 1 1993 January 20, 1993 City of Rancho Cucalttonga Planning Division ~x. Brad Bullet CITY-OF RANCHO CUCAI~NC~ 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 VICTORIA COURTYARD Tentative Parcel Nap PM 13808 Parcel Nap Conditions per Conditional Ole Per~Lt 90-42 Approved July 10, 1991 Dear Brads As a follow up to our meeting last mk, we are requesting a reduction in the offsits h~&ov.- -nts required by the above Cond/tional UIO Per~Lt and Tentative P~rcel Nap as approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1991. ! have provided a copt of the conditiOnl which relatel to the lmp&~v,- -nil on Foothill Boulevard that states 'The ll~Lts of the offsite ~oY~ -nil may be reduced as approved by the City Council'. Now that Cc~u~Lty Pacil£ties Dlsf~lct 91-1 is on hold lndefin/tely, we are requesting redevelol~ent assistance to construct the offsites which were conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel M&p 13808. As such, before we make a formal proposal to theL,:.~l.i].Oplmnt agencF, we needto specif~the limits of construc~ion ns well as the associated costs. I have enclosed for ~mur lnfor~tion and review a copt of a blue line drawing prepared by Charchol/Har~m-n and Associates which depicts the ll~Lts of construction on Foothill Boulevard per Jack Charchoi,s discussions with Shintu Bose. It is our undgrstanding that the scope of h~)~'OvC lnts we are requesting would he consistent with other proJectl approved mfter Victoria Courtyard such as the Nasi project, Foothill Marketplace, ~he hoteX project at Rochemterand Foothill and therecently approved SmtthaPoodking project. ~ COIIIIIK~IqATI: PL.~Z~ · SUITE ~$0' NEWPC)PIT BIACH, CA elleO-TeApe P. o, Iox s?oo · NLrWFONT sLr. AcH, CA eaes&-e7oo i71.4) ?se - MS31 WAX .~' (?~1.) ?se- Ol~S Resolution No. 93-049 Page 7 Mr. Brad Bullet January 20, 1993 Page Two I understand' that you will be taking our request as soon as possible to the public works subcommittee to get a reading as to their thoughts prior to proceeding to the City Council. As you know, we are on a very tight time line and are ~7ing to keep Kmart, Home Depot, Circuit City and Carl's tied together so the project will happen. Should you have any questions regarding the enclesedplease let meknow, I would appreciate if youwould let me know after you have had a chance to talk to the public works subcommittee as to their thoughts. I would also like to know if public notice is requiredprior to being heard by the CityCouncil. I would appreciate your efforts. Best regards, JBP/.nyc HUGHES INVESTMENTS otter Enclosure CC ~' Linda Daniels Shintu Bose Bryan Austin Jack Charchol