HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-263 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 03-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00002,TO CHANGE DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD FROM A SECONDARY ARTERIAL TO A
COLLECTOR AND A MODIFIED COLLECTOR BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE ON THE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION PLAN, EXHIBIT III-4, TABLE III-
11, AND THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF GENERAL PLAN
ROADWAYS,AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0229-021-62, 63, AND 64.
A. RECITALS.
1. O & S Holdings, LLC, filed an application for General Plan Amendment
GPA2002-00002, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the
application." Subsequent to filing, O & S Holdings, LLC assigned its interest in
the application to Foothill Crossing, LLC.
2. On August 27, and continued to September 10, and September 24, 2003, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date and recommended approval of the application.
3. On October 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW,THEREFORE,it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved bythe City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 15, 2003, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard, approximately 530 feet west of the 1-15 Freeway on-ramp,with a
street frontage of approximately 1,300 feet and a lot depth of 1,700 feet,
which is presently unimproved; and
Resolution No. 03-263
Page 2 of 5
b. The property to the north of the subject site, on the north side of Foothill
P P Y 1
Boulevard, is undeveloped and is zoned for commercial uses,the propertyto
the south consists of the 1-15 freeway, the property to the east is
undeveloped and is planned for commercial uses, and the property to the
west is an electrical and flood control utility corridor and is being used for
plant nursery storage; and
c. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Transportation
Section of the General Plan by continuing to designate Day Creek Boulevard
as a Collector Road on the Circulation Plan; and
d. This amendment would not be m aterially i njurious o r d etrimental to t he
adjacent properties, and would not have a significant impact on the
environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed roadway classification is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access,size, and compatibility with existing land
use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with t he G eneral P[an a s
Collector roads are identified and listed within the Transportation Section.
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified October 17, 2001, as the
Final EIR for the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The
Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15166 provide
that when a Program EIR has been certified, subsequent activities in the
program must be examined in light of the program EIR to determine whether an
additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that
no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required,
the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the program
EIR. Because the applicant has proposed modifications to the Master Plan
Circulation System, an Addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR was
prepared, and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the Program EIR
have been incorporated into the project design.
An addendum to the 2001 General Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation
because some changes or additions are necessary to describe the modification
to the Master Plan Circulation System, but none of the conditions described in
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council has reviewed
and considered the attached addendum based on the following findings:
Resolution No. 03-263
Page 3 of 5
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major
revisions to the previous E IR because of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in severity of previously identified
environmental effects; and
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to
the previous EIR because of the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects; and
c. There is no new information of substantial importance,which was not known
and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at
the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following:
1) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR; 2)significant effects previously examined will be substantially
more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3) mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible,and
would substantially reduce one or more effects of the project, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or 4)
mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the final EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment GPA2002-
00002, to change the General Plan Land Circulation Plan, Exhibit III-4 to
designate Day Creek Boulevard as a Modified Collector with median for
approximately 750 feet south of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way, and a
Collector for the remainder of the street to its intersection with Rochester
Avenue, and add (in bold print) to General Plan Table III-11 as shown below:
Exhibit III-4
(showing southeast portion of map only)
Widened intersectionsshp
�i Freeway-interchange.shp
0 Proposed-freeway-interchange ship
FOOTHILL BLVD. NGrade-sepanahon.shp
/�y�`�Rallroadshp
iIr ulahon-roadsUshp
\/COLLECTOR
ARROW RT. MAJOR DIVIDED HIGHWAY
anuN fe qik YIM.
----------
MAJOR-ARTERIAL
'MAJOR-DIVIDED
�V MODIFIED COLLECTOR
f>1f MODIFIED MAJOR
.. MODIFIED SECONDARY
pj SECONDARY
4 L�JGp.shp
;.,JFreeway2.shp
Circ study ama2.shp
6 x Ctybnd.shp
^\/f104
l v 144
Resolution No. 03-263
Page 4 of 5
Table 111-11 -showing portions to be added (bold) only
CLASSIFICATIONS OF GENERAL PLAN ROADWAYS
Boundaries Boundades
East/West St. West East North/South St. North I South
Collector Streets
Day Creek Blvd. Rochester Ave. I 3000' east/northeast
Boundaries I I Boundaries
EastlWest Street West I East North/South Street North South
Modified Collector With Median
TDay Creek Blvd. Foothill Blvd. 750' south
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Please see the following page
for formal adoption,certification and signatures
Resolution No. 03-263
Page 5 of 5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 2003.
AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Howdyshell, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kurth
ABSTAINED: None
William . Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
,"a:o��
ebra J. Ad s, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J.ADAMS,CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,California,do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,ata Regular Meeting of said City Council held
on the 15th day of October 2003.
Executed this 16th day of October 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Ada , CMC, City Clerk