HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/02/18 - Agenda Packet
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
AGlENDAS
. Redevelopment Agency
. Fire Pmtection District
. City Cm.IJWIlcil
REGULAR MlEETINGS
1st and 3'd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 p.m.
FEBRUARY 18, 2004
AGENCY. BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William J. Alexander.................... Mayor
Diane Williams............... Mayor Pro Tem
Rex Gutierrez.................. ...... ....Member
Robert J. HowdyshelL............ Member
Donald J. Kurth, M.D. ............... Member
Jack Lam......................... City Manager
James L. Markman.............City Attorney
Debra J. Adams..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Closed Session. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Tapia Conference Room
Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting. .. Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting. . .. Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . .. Council Chambers
~
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
.
RANcHO
CUCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There
is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
du,ing the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11 :00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.cLrancho-
cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
I) If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
"
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18,2004 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
1
I A. CALL TO ORDER I
1. Roll Cali: Alexander -' Gutierrez -'
Howdyshell _' Kurth -' and Williams -
II B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS J
1. Presentation of a Proclamation to the American Cancer Society in
recognition of "Relay for Life" - a team event to fight cancer.
2. Demonstration of touch screen voting equipment by the San
Bernardino County Registrar of Voters.
II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ~
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
II D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS II
,
This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the
City Council on matters not on the agenda.
[ E. CONSENT CALENDAR I
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: January 21,2004
February 4. 2004
2. Approval of Warrants, Register January 28, 2004 through February 9, 1
2004, and Payroll ending February 9. 2004, for the total amount of
$5,970,477.03.
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 23
31,2004.
-
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
2
4. Approval to accept and expend grant revenue in the amount of
$17,156.16 awarded by the State of California Office ofTraffic Safety
for sobriety checkpoint overtime into Fund 370, Account 4740,
Expense 5005.
29
5. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the
advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for improvements in Phases
1 B(B), 3B(A) and 3B(B) of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and
2003-01 (to be bid and constructed as one project), including street,
storm drain, water facilities, sewer facilities, traffic signal
modifications, landscaping and fiber optic conduits on Foothill Blvd.
between Rochester Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, to be funded from
Ace!. Nos. 16123035650 and 16143035650.
30
RESOLUTION NO. 04-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A)
AND 3B(B) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01,
INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER
FACILITIES, SEWER FACILITIES, TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, LANDSCAPING
AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS ON FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER
AVENUE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
32
6. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Area
Master Plan for FY 2002/2003 and appropriation of $61,666 to Ace!.
No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0.
38
7. Approval to Summarily Vacate the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of
Parcel Map No. 13692, an Offer of Dedication for future public access
to Parcel 2, located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Haven
Avenue; V-192 - APN: 201-182-34.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER
OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13692,
AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR FUTURE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO PARCEL 2, LOCATED
SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF
HAVEN AVENUE; V-192 -APN: 201-182-34
39
41
"
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
3
8. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Historic Point of Interest
Designation DRC2003-01048 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - a
request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven
Avenue, as an Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of
all buildings and structures on property - APN: 0209-131-02.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE
CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERY A
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED
AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0209-131-02
44
122
9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for DRC2002-00499,
located at the southwest corner of 61h Street and Fairway View Place,
submitted by KSL Rancho Cucamonga, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-029
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND iMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00499
RESOLUTION NO. 04-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO.1 FOR DRC2002-00499
133
136
137
10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-
00511, located at 8657 and 8661 Pecan Avenue (APN: 229-181-09
and 229-181-12) submitted by Samuel V. DiCarlo and Barbara J.
DiCarlo.
144
RESOLUTION NO. 04-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00511
146
-
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
4
RESOLUTION NO. 04-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00511
147
11. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-
00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6th
Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Miliiken.
157
RESOLUTION NO. 04-033
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00922
RESOLUTiON NO. 04-034
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00922
160
161
12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Monument Cash Deposit for Tract 14771, located north of Ringstem
Drive, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers and release
of previously submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Securities and Cash Monumentation Deposit accepted by City
Council on October 15, 1997, from Lauren Development, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-035
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR
TRACT 14771 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON OCTOBER 15, 1997
169
172
I
"
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
5
13. Approval of Map, improvement Agreement, Improvement Security,
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map
No. 16365 located on the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard
and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Regency Realty Group, Inc., -
APN: 227-201-44.
173
RESOLUTION NO. 04-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 16365, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 04-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16365
176
177
14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security,
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract No.
16370, located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor
Lane, submitted by Victoria Arbors, LLC - APN: 227-161-46 and 47.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 16370, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 04-039
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16370
185
188
189
e
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18,2004 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
6
15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security
Rider and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No.9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for
Tract Map 16455, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road
and the southbound 1-15 Freeway onramp, submitted by KB Home
Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-040
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 16455, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 04-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16455
196
199
200
16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $827,058.40 to the iowest
responsible bidder, Mega Way Enterprises (CO 04-011), and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$82,705.84, for the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase 1A of
Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from CFD 2001-
01 funds, Acc! No. 16123035650/1442612-0 and appropriate
$909,764.24 (Contract award of $827,058.40 plus 10% contingency in
the amount of $82,705.84) to Acc! No. 16123035650/1442612-0 from
CFD 2001-01 fund balance.
212
17. Approval of the Lease Agreement (CO 04-012) between San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for the Etiwanda Railway Station and the Pacific
Electric Railway Right of Way.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LEASE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO
ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SAN BAG)
AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR THE ETiWANDA RAILWAY STATION
AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY
RiGHT OF WAY EXTENDING FROM
WESTERLY TO EASTERLY CITY LIMITS
220
222
fit
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
7
18. Approval to execute a Sublease Amendment between the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, as sublessee, to assign certain rights to make
emergency repairs and construct an emergency generator on
property known as the Foothill Family Sports Center, located at 9059
San Bernardino Road.
223
19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Banyan Street
between Day Creek Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR BANYAN
STREET BETWEEN DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE
225
229
20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Day Creek
Boulevard Traffic Signals at Vintage Drive, Banyan Street and Wilson
Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTiON NO. 04-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT VINTAGE
DRIVE, BANYAN STREET AND WILSON
AVENUE
230
234
21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Rancho Etiwanda
Project (elementary school frontage improvements), located at
northwest corner of Banyan Street and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted
by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-045
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO
ETIWANDA PROJECT AND THE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FRONTAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
235
239
22. Approvai of improvement Agreement Extension for Rancho Etiwanda
Project (street, storm drain and landscape infrastructure), located on
both sides of Day Creek Boulevard north of 210 Freeway, submitted
bv Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
240
"
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 -7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
8
RESOLUTION NO. 04-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO
ETIWANDA PROJECT AND THE STREET,
STORM DRAIN AND LANDSCAPE
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
244
23. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Wilson Avenue
Storm Drain Line A-l, located in Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek
Bouievard, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON
AVENUE STORM DRAIN LINE A-1
245
249
24. Approvai of Improvement Agreement Extension for Wilson Avenue
Storm Drain Lines "C" and "E", located west of Day Creek Boulevard
in Wilson Avenue and north of Tract 14496, submitted by Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-048
A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON
AVENUE STORM DRAIN LINES "C" AND "E"
250
254
25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Cash Deposit, accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit, and file a Notice
of Completion for Improvements for PM 15278, submitted by Plaza
Developments, located on 6133 Archibald Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15278
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
255
257
26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Cash Deposit, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for
Parcel Map 16307, located at 8585 Comet Street, submitted by Jose
and Grace Jimenez.
258
ft CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 9
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-050
A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16037
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
260
27. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements, release the Faithful
Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, submitted by RC
Homes, LLC, located on the south side of Miller Avenue between
Etiwanda and East Avenues.
261
RESOlUTION NO. 04-051
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND
15711-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
263
28. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract
15914, submitted by HER 22, LLC, located on Birdsong Place off of
Hidden Farm Road, south of Almond, west of Hermosa Avenue.
264
RESOLUTION NO. 04-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15914 AND
AUTHORiZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
266
29. Approval to accept Improvement, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for
Improvements for Tract 16334, submitted by Richmond American
Homes, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the
Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-053
A RESOlUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16334 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
267
269
ft CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18,2004 -7:00 P.M. 10
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
30. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 6120873, in
the amount of $24,245 for the Modification of Traffic Signals and
Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and
Fredericksburg Avenue, Contract No. 02-032.
31. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 6120872, in
the amount of $33,737 for the Modification of Traffic Signals and
Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Carnelian Street and LaVine/La
Grande Streets, Contract No. 02-033.
270
272
32. Approval to accept the Construction of the Heritage Park Storage
Shed, Contract No. 03-045, as complete, retain the Faithful
Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, reiease the Labor and
Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $59,001.20.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERITAGE
PARK STORAGE SHED, CONTRACT NO. 03-
045 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
274
276
33. Approval to accept the Construction of the Milliken Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation from 6th Street to 7'h Street, Contract No. 03-101, as
complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and release
the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of
$137,242.57.
280
RESOLUTION NO. 04-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MILLIKEN
AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
FROM 6TH STREET TO 7TH STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 03-101, AND AUTHORIZING
THE FiLING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
283
II
F. CONSENT ORDINANCES
II
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
It
RANcHo
CUCAMONGA
II
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSiDERATION OF APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE - An appeal of the Pianning
Commission's decision to deny a change of exterior building material
for a 25,622 square foot warehouse in Industriai District, Subarea 13
on a 1.25 acre site, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN:
0229-283-02.
[
RESOLUTION NO. 04-056
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE REQUEST TO
CHANGE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS
FROM TRAVERTINE STONE TO HEAVY
SANDBLASTED CONCRETE FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116, A
25,622 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATED AT 9275
CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0229-283-02
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
11
ill
284
306
i
ft CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 12
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REpORTS ill
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR 308
EXTENSION TO THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIME LIMIT TO REPAY
INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33354.6 OR ARTICLE 12.
AND AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE NO
TIME LIMIT ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LOANS. ADVANCES
AND INDEBTEDNESS PAID FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY'S LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND OR
ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL DEBT IN ORDER TO FULFILL THE
AGENCY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBliGATIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 721 (first reading) 310
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME
LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVElOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO
THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 33333.6
2. APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF 313
$193.554 AWARDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (CEGP)
INTO ACCT. NO. 1244000-4740 (GRANT INCOME): AND
AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $155.800 INTO ACCT. NO.
1244302-5604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - VEHICLES); $17.950 INTO
ACCT. NO. 1244302-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMPUTER
EQUIPMENT); $4.200 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5203 (CAPITAL
OUTLAY - CAMERA EQUIPMENT); $5.620 INTO ACCT. NO.
1244302-5285 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - SAFETY GEAR AND
EQUIPMENT); $1.200 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5200 (CAPITAL
OUTLAY - OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE); AND $8.784 INTO
ACCT. NO. 1244302-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) FOR TOTAL
GRANT EXPENDITURES OF $193.554.
- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 -7:00 P.M. 13
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS ]
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 315
UPDATE
2. CONSiDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LOCAL 324
TAXPAYERS AND PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTION ACT. A
STATEWIDE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE VOTER
APPROVAL BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY CONFISCATE
LOCAL TAX FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. 04-057 326
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOCAL
TAXPAYERS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
PROTECTION ACT, A STATEWIDE BALLOT
iNITIATIVE TO REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL
BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY
CONFISCATE LOCAL TAX FUNDS
3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTiON SUPPORTING 328
PROPOSITIONS 57 (THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT)
AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET
ACT) ON THE MARCH BALLOT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-058 330
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION
57 (THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT)
AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE CALIFORNIA
BALANCED BUDGET ACT) ON THE MARCH
BALLOT
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT
MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004 -7:00 P.M. 14
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
II
L. PUBLIC COMMUNICA nONS
~I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
1.
REQUEST BY WILLIAM TRUDEAU TO CHANGE CITY'S ROOFING
ORDINANCE TO ALLOW HOMEOWNER THE OPPORTUNITY TO
CHOOSE BETWEEN MULTIPLE TYPES OF ROOFING
PRODUCTS
333
II
M. ADJOURNMENT
II
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on February 12 2004, seventy two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
January 21 , 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, January 21, 2004, at the
Cucamonga County Water District facilities located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Council members: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Wiiliams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
******
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item.
B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF 1-15, GARY
SAFADY, O&S HOLDINGS, AND JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING
TERMS OF AGREEMENT - CITY
******
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
'* '*.. '* '* '*
II
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
II
Closed session began at 5:35 pem.
******
II
E. RECESS
II
The closed session adjourned at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken.
* '* 1< '* '* '*
City Council Minutes
January 21,2004
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reoular Meetino
II
A. CALL TO ORDER
II
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 21,2004, at
the Cucamonga County Water District Board Room, located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
Present were Council members: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Bill Curley, Deputy
City Attorney; Linda D. Danieis, RDA Director; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA Analyst; James C. Frost, City
Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor;
Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil,
City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Jeff Barnes, Parks/Landscape
Maintenance Superintendent; Rex Whitney, Maintenance Supervisor; Dale Catron; Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula
Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho
Cucamonga Poiice Department; Fire Chief Dennis Michael and Battalion Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Dawson,
Management Analyst III; Kimberiy Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
******
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTA nONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of the City's Maintenance and Facilities Staff for their
exceiient work at the Epicenter which lead to the recent award of being named the "Finest Class A
Stadium in the Country" by Baseball America.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Maintenance and Facilities staff and thanked them for
the excellent job they do and congratulated them on the stadium award they received from Baseball
America.
******
II
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
II
C1. Jim Kenny, 5036 Crestview - Skyline Estates, felt because there was not enough resources
available to completely meet the challenges presented as a result of the Grand Prix Fire, he asked the
City Council not to allow any more development/building in his area in case that situation ever occurs
again.
C2. Cindy Bradley, volunteer for American Cancer Society, stated they will behaving a fundraising event
this Saturday at Los Osos High School. She invited the Council to participate.
City Council Minutes
January 21, 2004
Page 3
C3. John Lyons felt Councilmember Kurth had not followed the law because of a recent letter he had
sent soliciting campaign contributions. He stated the information in the letter was not accurate. He
pointed out he was one of the Recall Committee Members.
******
II
D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
~
01. Council member Gutierrez expressed his condolences to the famiiies that lost a loved one this past
weekend. He wished them peace.
02. Councilmember Howdyshell stated he attended a theater presentation at Los Osos High School and
talked about how wonderful it was. He encouraged everyone to support them. He commented on an
article that he had read in the newspaper about the City donating a fire truck to Crafton College Fire
Academy, he stated he had also attended the grand opening ceremony of the Cucamonga Middle School
gymnasium.
03. Councilmember Williams also mentioned the wonderful performance at Los Osos High School. She
commented on the great behavior of the high school students and how grown up they were. She stated
on January 111h, she had the privilege to present Proclamations to 19 girls who were received the Golden
Award, which is the hi9hest award a Girl Scout and achieve. She commented on the 251h Anniversary of
the VIP Club, which was last Thursday. She talked about Howard McMan who was their first President.
She stated she had also attended the Cucamonga Middle School gymnasium dedication. She
commented the Mayor had presented the State of the City Address last week to the Chamber Members
and that this would be shown on Channel 3. She felt this would be very informative for people. She
mentioned an article she had read in the newspaper about Dr. Kurth being an ex-dru9 addict and feit this
took courage to share this. She stated he is avaiiable to help people if they need it.
04. Councilmember Kurth stated his heart goes out to the people that lost their kids because of the
incident that took place on Haven Avenue. He mentioned the gymnasium dedication at the Cucamonga
Middle School that he went to with Councilmembers Wiliiams and Howdyshell. He stated on January 1 g
he and Councilmember Williams attended a breakfast in observance of Martin Luther King, Jr., which was
held in Ontario. He thanked Cindy Bradley for reminding them about the cancer survivor relay coming
this weekend. He stated he is willing to help anyone with a drug addiction problem. He stated next week
he wili be in Sacramento with some of his medical colleagues and will be meeting with legislators
regarding the disease of addiction.
05. Mayor Alexander commented on the terrible deaths that occurred over the weekend. He stated our
law enforcement is working very hard to solve these crimes and also the one at the Sycamore Springs
Apartments.
* * * * * *
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
E1. Approval of Minutes: December 17, 2003
January 7, 2004
E2. Approval of Warrants, Register 12/24/03 through 1/13/04 and Payroll ending 1/13/04, for the total
amount of $1,642,136.24.
City Council Minutes
January 21, 2004
Page 4
E3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of December 31,2003.
E4. Approval of the License Agreement between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG)
(CO 04-003) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the installation, operation, maintenance and repair of
the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain as it crosses under the SAN BAG owned railroad right-of-way iocated
374 feet south of Cielilo Street, designated as UP Miie Post 523.41.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
(SAN BAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO FOR THE INSTALLATION,
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE HERMOSA
AVENUE STORM DRAIN AS IT CROSSES UNDER THE SAN BAG
OWNED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED 374 FEET SOUTH OF
CIELlTO STREET, DESIGNATED AS UP MILE POST 523.41
E5. Approval of a request from Oid Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America for a Waiver of Rental Fees for
their Scout-O-Rama to be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex Soccer
Fields on April 30, 2004 - May 2, 2004.
E6. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $155,980.00 awarded by the United States
Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (Congressman Dreier EOC Grant)
into account number 1382000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $44,900.00 into
account number 1382105-5603 (Capital Outlay-Equipment), $65,811.00 into account No. 1382105-5605
(Capital Outlay-Computers), $2,399.00 into account number 1382105-5290 (Specialized Tools and
Equipment), $12,780 into account number 1382105-5152 (Computer Software), and $30,090.00 into
account number 1382105-5300 (Contract Services) for total grant expenditures of $155,980.00.
E7. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $27,000.00 awarded by the State of California
Office of Traffic Safety into account number 1384000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to
appropriate $27,000.00 into account number 1384501-5603 (Capital Outlay-Equipment) for totai grant
expenditures.
E8. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, Administrative Services Director and Finance
Officer to execute the appropriate documentation to be filed with the Office of Emergency Services for the
purpose of obtaining Federal assistance due to the destruction caused by the Grand Prix Fire.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER,
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AND FINANCE OFFICER TO
EXECUTE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION TO BE FILED WITH
THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF
OBTAINING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE DUE TO THE DESTRUCTION
CAUSED BY THE GRAND PRIX FIRE
E9. Approval for award and authorize the execution of Professional Services Agreement in the amount of
$60,704.00 to Signet Testing Laboratories, Inc. (CO 04-004), and authorize the expenditure of a 10%
contingency in the amount of $6,070.00, for Geotechnical and Material Testing and Inspection Services
for Phase 3A of CFD 2003-01, to be funded from fund 614 - CFD 2003-01, account number
16143035300/1442614-0.
City Council Minutes
January 21, 2004
Page 5
E10. Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement, SRA-35, for traffic signal installation at Carnelian and
Vivero Streets in conjunction with the development of Tract 15783, located on the west side of Carnelian
Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & 0 Construction, Inc. (CO 04-005), to be funded from
Transportation Reimbursement account number 11243035650/1026124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE
INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN AND VIVERO STREETS, SRA-35
E11. Approval to accept landscape improvement, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a
Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, submitted by RC
Homes, LLC, located on the south side of Miller Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
E12. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Area Master Plan for FY 2002/2003 and
appropriation of $53,287.00 to account number 1112303-5650/1026112-0.
E13. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda Area Master Plan for FY 2002/2003 and
appropriation of $94,709.00 to account number 1116303-5650/1026116-0.
E14. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda Area 9 Master Plan for FY 2002/2003 and
appropriation of $145,887.46 to account number 1126303-5650/1026126-0.
E15. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Local Street
Pavement Reconstruction north of 19th Street and east of Haven Avenue, to be funded from account
number 11763035650/1377176-0 (Measure "I" Funds).
RESOLUTION NO. 04-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL STREET
PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION NORTH OF 19TH STREET AND EAST
OF HAVEN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E16. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Highland Avenue
Landscape Improvements east of Day Creek Boulevard, to be funded from account number
11103165650/1454110-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD" IN SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
January 21, 2004
Page 6
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
.*****
II
F. CONSENT ORDINANCES
II
No items subrnitted.
* * * * * *
II
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
II
No items submitted.
'* '* '* * '* '*
II
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
II
H1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REVISE PENALTIES APPLICABLE TO VIOLATIONS
OF CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY CODES
Staff report presented by Trang Huynh, Building Official.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the pubiic hearing
was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 720.
ORDINANCE NO. 720 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING PENALTIES APPLICABLE TO
VIOLATIONS OF BUILDING AND SAFETY CODES OF THE CITY THAT
ARE DEEMED TO BE INFRACTIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 1 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth, to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 720 for the February 4, 2004 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
******
I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REpORTS
No items submitted.
******
City Council Minutes
January 21 , 2004
Page 7
II
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
~
J1. PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to receive and file the report. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
******
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
******
II
L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
II
No communication was made from the pubiic.
******
(I
M. ADJOURNMENT
I]
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: .
February 4, 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
II
A. CALL TO ORDER
"
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at the
Cucamonga County Water District facilities iocated at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was caiied to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donaid J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor WiIIlarn J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
******
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items.
B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHiLL BOULEVARD, WEST OF 1-15, GARY
SAFADY, O&S HOLDINGS, AND JOE O'NEILL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY,
REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT - CITY
B2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY BASELINE & 1-15 PROPERTIES AND IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 227-131-059; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOSEPH O'NEIL,
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, BASELINE & 1_
15 PROPERTIES - CITY
B3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY BEST CALIFORNIA GAS, LTD., AND IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 227-131-060; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOSEPH O'NEIL,
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING
PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, BEST
CALIFORNIA GAS, L TO - CITY
CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
FOR REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY MOHSEN GHANEIAN AND CIRCUIT CORPORATION AND
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 227-131-54 AND 061; NEGOTIATING PARTIES,
JOSEPH O'NEIL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS
CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER,
MOHSEN GHANEIAN AND CIRCUIT CORPORATION - CITY
>\' * >\' '* >\' >\'
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 2
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No communication was made on closed session items.
******
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
The closed session began at 5:35 p.m.
******
~
E. RECESS
~I
The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken.
******
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reaular Meetina
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at
the Cucamonga County Water District Board Room, located at 10440 Ashford Street, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:28 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, MD., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; In9rid
Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy,
Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance
Manager; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Brad Buiier, City Planner; Donald Granger,
Assistant Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdie, Community Services Director; Dave
Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Martindale, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management
Analyst III; Deborah Ciark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department;
Fire Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the
City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II;
Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
'" '" '" '" '" '"
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 3
II
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
11
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to the American Heart Association in recognition of "Go Red for
Women" to fight Heart Disease in Women.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Pam Poliakoff, Inland Empire Corporate Events Director
for the American Heart Association.
Pam Poliakoff, American Heart Association, talked about the Heart Walk on February 29 at the Ontario
Milis Mall.
******
II
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
II
C1. Earl Anderson thanked the City for the many good things they have done to prevent the water, mud
and debris from getting into their homes since the fires occurred last October. He stated they do
appreciate everything that has been done. However, he felt if there are rains like there were in 1969,
things will be disastrous for the residents. He feit they need a debris basin, collection basin and a
concrete channel where the water can flow. He stated if you go to Beryl and Hiliside, you can see
something similar to what he is talking about. He mentioned he was told by the Engineering Division that
it will take three to five years to get something like this done. He stated one of the reasons Engineering
felt this would take so long is because the area has been designated a Blue Line Navigable stream. He
stated he did not agree with this. He hoped that the funds can be found to get this taken care of sooner.
Mayor Alexander stated the City had to deai with the Biue Line Navigable Stream issue for the mall
project and felt it was ridiculous. He stated if there is a way to overcome these delays, the City will do it,
but that sometimes there are delays out of the City's control.
Mr. Anderson stated during the Northridge earthquake things got done sooner than anticipated
and hoped the same could be done for this.
Jack Lam, City Manager, talked about the last time the City dealt with the Blue Line Navigable issue and
how long it took to deal with it.
Mr. Anderson stated he and his neighbors have contacted Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein and
Arnold Schwarzenegger and above to try to get some help for this and asked the City to do the
same.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he is glad Mr. Anderson is doing this and that the City will do the same.
C2. Me9an Daniels congratulated Diane Williams on being appointed to the Girl Scout Board and stated
she is part of Troop 1151. She mentioned it is Girl Scout Cookie Time and would like people to buy
cookies. She talked about a special project she is involved with concerning the sale of cookies. She is
asking people to buy cookies so they can be shipped to the troops in Iraq. She stated she actuaily loses
money on the sale of the cookies because it costs her approximately $ .80 to ship one box. She stated
peopie can contact Jennifer Camacho at the Girl Scout Counsel at 399-0808. She hoped that the Council
would support her and asked that the Council share her idea with their friends.
C3. John Gostomal, 4975 Skyline, stated he recently moved into his home, but that it has been a
nightmare ever since. He appreciates what the City has done as a result of the Grand Prix Fires, but that
it is a Band-Aid and asked the City to keep fighting to get funds to do more to protect their homes.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 4
C4. Bob Lundy, 2418 Foothili #0, La Verne, stated he is with the Route 66 Tourism Non-profit. He stated
their next revival will be at the Claremont Inn on Foothill. He felt there would be a lot of businesses that
would like to welcome this travel trade show to be held on February 17. He asked the Council to take on
one more challenge to see how they can work together to help him with this event.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated it is good to see him back and hoped the City can support him however
possible. He felt Route 66 has a great future and wanted to do what he can to help promote this.
C5. John Lyons stated he has previously talked about a letter sent by Councilmember Kurth asking for
campaign contributions and that he is asking for him to send out a retraction letter because of untrue
information in it. He stated Mr. Kurth is not running for "re-election" as is stated in his letter. He hoped
that he would follow the rules and that he would state in his ballot statement that he is running for
election, not re-eiection.
:It*****
D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
01. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he enjoyed attending the dinner at the University of LaVerne that
honored Sam Maloof. He thanked the Public Works Department for keeping the damage to a minimum
due to the rains that occurred earlier in the week. He thanked the Water District for letting the City use
this building for the Council meetings while the Council Chambers was undergoing seismic retrofit work.
He stated he is committed to the animal issue and that they have a meeting tomorrow to discuss this. He
commented he is aware there are stiil areas of the freeway that need work with regards to the noise. He
stated he is still concerned and wants to help people with these problems. He stated he appreciates the
people's patience with traffic while all of the construction is occurring on City streets. He thanked the City
Council, Fontana City Council, Paul Biane and David Dreier for suPportin9 some hi9h school kids (for
which he is an advisor to) that will be going to Washington, D.C. and New York.
02. Councilmember Kurth mentioned the new name for the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD),
is Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). He stated he is very proud of the job that the staff and
Board do at the CVWD and that he was proud to be part of the Board prior to being on the City Council.
He felt the American Heart Association work was wonderful. He stated the City is working very hard to
help get funding to protect the residents from any further flood damage. He mentioned the League's
ballot measure to protect California cities' revenues. He asked that when people are asked to sign the
petition, that they do sign it.
D3. Councjlmember Williams stated she is supportive of the American Heart Association work. She
commented that heart disease is the number one kiiler of women. She stated she went to a badge
pinning ceremony for some of the fire fighters that recently got promoted and added she congratulates
them on their accomplishment. She stated she has been busy getting ready to go out in the community
with the petitions to save the City's revenues.
04. Councilmember Howdyshell had no comment.
05. Mayor Alexander commented on the great work of the Christian Okoye Foundation and the work he
does. He thanked him for the work he does and added he is not one to take credit for his contributions.
'* '* '* '* '* *
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 5
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item E14 should be removed from the agenda and will return at a
future date.
E1. Approval of Warrants, Register 1/14/04 through 1/27/04, and Payroll ending 1/27/04 for the total
amount of $3,620,965.11.
E2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Beryl
Community Trail from Hiliside Road to north of Almond Street, to be funded from Ace!. No.
11103035650/1436110-0 (Beautification Funds).
RESOLUTION NO. 04-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERYL
COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM HILLSIDE ROAD TO NORTH OF ALMOND
STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Grove Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Ace!. No.
11763035650/1263176-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GROVE AVENUE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E4. Approval of vendor expenditures for the purchase of fertilizers, chemicals and soil additives from
Simplot Partners in the amount not to exceed $97,000 for fiscal year 2003/04, with an option to renew"
annually after review and confirmation of pricing for an additional one year period, up to a total of three
years, to be funded from Acc!. Nos. 1001316-5200 ($12,000),1001317-5250 ($500), 1130303-5200
($5,000), 1131303-5200 ($12,500), 1133303-5200 ($8,000), 1134303-5200 ($10,000), 1001104-5203
($2,000), 1137303-5200 ($8,000), 1700210-5203 ($18,000), and 1848303-5200 ($21,000). REMOVED
FOR DISCUSSION BY HOWDYSHELL.
E5. Approvai for authorization to allow Verizon Wireless to perform on-site testing at the Epicenter for the
purpose of reviewing the suitability of the property to instali a Wireless Monopine Communication Tower.
E6. Approval of seven emergency repair projects as a resuit of heavy flooding on December 25, 2003,
authorize staff to commence work immediately, and appropriate funds in the amount of $101,000 from
Capital Reserve Fund Balance into Acc!. No. 1025001-5300/8003-0. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY
HOWDYSHELL.
E7. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Franchised Waste Haulers to
charge for extra automated refuse, recycling and green waste barrels beginning March 1, 2004.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 04-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA'S FRANCHISED WASTE HAULERS TO CHARGE FOR
EXTRA AUTOMATED TRASH, RECYCLING AND GREENWASTE
CONTAINERS BEGINNING MARCH 1,2004
E8. Approval of Resolutions to change the place for holding reguiar City Council, Planning/Historic
Preservation Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission meetings.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-227C
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNiA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND
PLACE FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 90-193B
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND
PLACE FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE
PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
E9. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance
District Nos. 1 & 6 for Parcel Map 15966, located at the northeast corner of White Oak & Elm Avenues,
submitted by Rancho Oaks, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15966,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15966
E10. Approvai of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel
Map 16010, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive, submitted by Vineyards East,
LLC, and Hyssop Vineyards, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
16010, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 04-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16010
E11. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map 16454-1, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and
Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16454-1,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16454-1
E12. Approval to authorize the execution of a Distribution and Service Extension Agreement with Foothill
Crossing, LLC (CO 04-007) for the extension of electric utilities within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipai
Utility Service Area.
E13. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $589,162.00 to the apparent low bidder, Laird Construction, Inc. (CO 04-008), and authorize
the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $58,916.20 for the Construction of the Milliken
AvenuelWilson Avenue Extension, Milliken Avenue from 1380' north of Banyan Avenue and Wilson
Avenue from Day Creek Channel to Milliken Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Funds, Acct. No.
11243035650/1448124-0 and appropriate $758,078.20 to Acct. No. 11243035650/1448124-0 from
Transportation Funds to cover the cost construction survey and material testing.
E14. f'PPrEl'Ial to accept tRO bigs recoived, oxcept tRat s~l3mittog by Cd Construction, Inc., as non
rosponsive to tRe noeGs of tho City, ang aV!arg ang autRorize tRe exoc~tion ef tho contract in tRe aR1o~nt
of $827,058.40 10 tRO lowest responsil3le l3igger, Mega Wa]' Efitecprfses (CO 94 009), and a~tRorize the
expongiture of a 10% contin~encJ' in the aR1o~nt of $82,705.84, fer the Langscaping ang Sigo'Nalk in
PRase 1f. ef COR1R1~nity Facilities District 2001 91, to l3e f~ngeG freR1 CFD 2091 01 f~ngs, .^,cct. No.
1131239351359/14421312 O. REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
E15. Approval to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for improvements
already accepted for DR 96-27, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue north of Wilson Avenue,
submitted by Mastercrafl Homes.
E16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00218, submitted by Ridge Santa
Anita Partners, LLC, located on the west side of Santa Anita, north of 4th Street.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 8
RESOLUTION NO. 04-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, . ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00218 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E17. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM 046 25500 in the amount of $49,519.50,
for the Church Street Right Turn Lane Improvement from Haven Avenue to 500' west, Contract No. 02-
024.
E18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 005SB 103721494M BCM in the amount of
$48,993.81, for the Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 02-
044.
A 19. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM04691200 in the amount of $229,000.00 for
the Arrow Route from HeUman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and Hellrnan Avenue from Arrow
Route to south of FoothiU Boulevard Landscape improvements, Contract No. 02-048.
A20. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 5624322 in the amount of $222,660.00 for the
Etiwanda Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements at the BSNF and SCRRA Railroad Crossings, Contract
No. 02-067.
A21. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 5624329 in the amount of $354,405.80 for the
Locai Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 02-071.
A22. Approval to accept the Construction of the Lemon Avenue Street Rehabilitation from Beryl Street to
Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 03-022 as complete, retain the Faithfui Performance Bond as a
Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $133,753.30.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LEMON AVENUE
STREET REHABILITATION FROM BERYL STREET TO AMETHYST
AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 03-022, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items E4, E6 and E14. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM E4. Approval of vendor expenditures for the purchase of fertilizers,
chemicals and soil additives from Simplot Partners in the amount not to exceed $97,000 for fiscal
year 2003/04, with an option to renew annually after review and confirmation of pricing for an
additional one year period, up to a total of three years, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001316-5200
($12,000), 1001317-5250 ($500), 1130303-5200 ($5,000), 1131303-5200 ($12,500), 1133303-5200
($8,000), 1134303-5200 ($10,000), 1001104-5203 ($2,000), 1137303-5200 ($8,000), 1700210-5203
($18,000), and 1848303-5200 ($21,000).
Councilmember Howdyshell stated he would like to approve this based on not exceeding the CPI
limitation on the pricing.
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve the staff recommendation of item E4.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 9
DISCUSSION OF ITEM E6. Approval of seven emergency repair projects as a result of heavy
flooding on December 25, 2003, authorize staff to commence work immediately, and appropriate
funds in the amount of $101,000 from Capital Reserve Fund Balance into Acct. No. 1025001-
5300/8003-0.
Councilmember Howdysheli stated he has had several phone calls and people have stopped him
regarding this. He wanted to extend the compliments he has received to the staff for ali they have done.
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell. seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendation of item E6.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
* * 1< 1< 1< *
II
F. CONSENT ORDINANCES
II
F1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REVISE PENALTIES APPLICABLE TO
VIOLATIONS OF CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY CODES
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titie of Ordinance No. 720.
ORDINANCE NO. 720 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING PENALTIES APPLICABLE TO
VIOLATIONS OF BUILDING AND SAFETY CODES OF THE CITY
THAT ARE DEEMED TO BE INFRACTIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 1
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
MOTION: Moved by Wiiliams. seconded by Howdysheli to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
720. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
******
II
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
11
G1. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST. CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A
TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO AAA INLAND EMPIRE CAB (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 17,
2003)
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is asked that this be removed from the agenda at the request of the
applicant; therefore. the public hearing to consider the permit is canceled.
MOTION: Moved by Howdysheli, seconded by Williams to cancel the public hearing. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
1< 1< 1< * 1< 1<
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items submitted.
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 10
'" '" '" '" '" '"
II
1. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REpORTS
IJ
11. UPDATE ON THE VICTORIA GARDENS MALL PROJECT (Oral Report)
A power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) was given by Linda Daniels, Redeveiopment
Agency Director.
ACTION: Report received and fiied.
'" '" '" '" '" *
II
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
IJ
J1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral Report)
Councilmember Williams stated the Federal Budget was signed by the President on January 23. She
stated he approved an appropriation of $800,000 for the Base Line and 1-15 Interchange redesi9n. She
added the City owes Congressman Dreier for ail of his time and effort in helping the City get this money.
She mentioned SB 744, authored by Senator Dunn, states that any developer that thinks the City's
requirements are too strict can appeal to the State Department of Housing for their consideration. She
felt local land use issues should be ieft with the cities and not the State. She mentioned SAN BAG wants
to go forward with getting Measure I extended now, even though it does not sunset until 2009. She
stated it is very important that this get extended.
Mayor Alexander commented that Measure I money collected from Rancho Cucamon9a residents stays
here in the City.
******
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
******
II
L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
~I
L 1. Councilmember Kurth wanted to thank the Sheriffs Department for their work with the apprehension
of the suspected person involved in the shooting that recently took place.
L2. Hilda Phillips taiked about her positive experience with the Sheriffs Department and how she saved
someone from getting a ticket for handicap parking.
******
City Council Minutes
February 4, 2004
Page 11
II
M. ADJOURNMENT
~
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted.
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: .
Check No.
AP - 00206063
AP - 00206064
AP - 00206065
AP - 00206067
AP - 00206068
AP - 00206069
AP - 00206070
AP - 00206072
AP - 00206073
AP - 00206075
AP - 00206075
AP - 00206075
AP - 00206076
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206077
AP - 00206078
AP - 00206079
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206080
AP - 00206081
AP - 00206082
AP - 00206083
AP - 00206083
AP - 00206084
AP - 00206085
AP - 00206086
AP - 00206087
AP - 00206088
AP - 00206089
AP - 00206090
AP - 00206091
AP - 00206092
AP - 00206093
AP - 00206094
AP - 00206094
AP - 00206094
AP - 00206094
AP - 00206095
AP - 00206095
AP - 00206095
AP - 00206095
AP - 00206095
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
1/28/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC
1/28/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS
1/28/2004 ABLAC
1/28/2004 ACUTINT AND GRAPffiCS
1/28/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD
1/28/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC
1/28/2004 AG ENGINEERING INC
1/28/2004 ALLDATA
1/28/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R
1/28/2004 ARCffiTERRA DESIGN GROUP
1/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
1/28/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION
1/28/2004 ASSI SECURITY
1/28/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
1/28/2004 BAKER, SHARI
1/28/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE
1/28/2004 BARNHART INC
1/28/2004 BARNHART INC
1/28/2004 BEVERIDGE, GEORGE
1/28/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED
1/28/2004 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL
1/28/2004 BRITT ANI CLEMENTS AND WESLEY WESTPHA
1/28/2004 C.W. DRIVER CONTRACTORS
1/28/2004 CAL STAR DELIVERY SERVICE
1/28/2004 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
1/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
1/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
1/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
1/28/2004 CALSENSE
1/28/2004 CALSENSE
1/28/2004 CALSENSE
1/28/2004 CALSENSE
1/28/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
1/28/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
1/28/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
1/28/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
1/28/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC
36.76
56.12
270.29
115.00
264.00
313.87
463.09
1,500.00
164.86
1,296.00
1,296.00
4,680.00
256.88
715.50
275.79
1,540.00
56.50
253.92
87.30
37.00
105.00
422.20
276.06
185.55
125.78
500.00
400.00
515.02
782.77
273.29
149.50
44.68
1,313,417.00
-131,342.00
90.00
240.00
3,181.19
5,000.00
20,452.00
427.69
72,426.88
43.31
22.50
25.00
1,104.46
1,174.50
177.81
1,007.47
740.78
210.19
126.33
223.67
25.00
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time114:22:4
Check No.
AP - 00206096
AP - 00206096
AP - 00206096
AP - 00206097
AP - 00206098
AP - 00206099
AP - 00206100
AP - 00206101
AP - 00206102
AP - 00206103
AP - 00206104
AP - 00206106
AP - 00206107
AP - 00206108
AP - 00206108
AP - 00206109
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A2enda Check Re2ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
1/28/2004 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE
1/28/2004 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE
1/28/2004 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE
1/28/2004 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DiSTRICT
1/28/2004 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES
1/28/2004 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT :
1/28/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK
1/28/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC.
1/28/2004 CMI-RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1/28/2004 COAST RECREATION INC
1/28/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
1/28/2004 CONCENTRA MEDiCAL CENTERS
1/28/2004 COUNTS UNLIMITED
1/28/2004 COURT TRUSTEE
1/28/2004 COURT TRUSTEE
1/28/2004 CRAPCO INC
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DiST
79.20
901.64
1,383.14
35.00
1,577.46
152.50
83,695.18
38.69
500.00
931.80
247.45
2,378.01
940.00
118.50
200.00
429.53
36.43
193.53
218.73
159.33
119.73
90.13
106.53
576.23
217.63
370.53
1,355.73
135.oJ
137.23
594.93
123.03
140.63
154.93
171.53
140.63
115.33
138.43
482.73
290.23
421.13
904.93
314.43
173.77
208.83
433.23
326.53
85.73
83.53
263.93
238.53
146.13
411.23
191.33
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02l1O/20C
Time: 14:22:4
2
Check No.
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206111
AP - 00206112
AP - 00206113
AP - 00206113
AP - 00206114
AP - 00206115
AP - 00206115
AP - 00206116
AP - 00206117
AP - 00206118
AP - 00206118
AP - 00206120
AP - 00206121
AP - 00206122
AP - 00206122
AP - 00206123
AP - 00206124
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206125
AP - 00206126
AP - 00206126
AP - 00206127
AP - 00206128
AP - 00206129
AP - 00206130
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
1/28/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY
1/28/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES
1/28/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES
1/28/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO
1/28/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT
1/28/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT
1/28/2004 DEAN, SEAN CHRISTOPHER
1/28/2004 DIAZ, V BEN
1/28/2004 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC
1/28/2004 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC
1/28/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION
1/28/2004 EASYLINK SERVICES CORP.
1/28/2004 EMCOR SERVICE
1/28/2004 EMCOR SERVICE
1/28/2004 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
1/28/2004 ETIW ANDA GARDENS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1/28/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
1/28/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC
1/28/2004 FOX WEATHER LLC.
1/28/2004 GALLAGHER'S FINISHING TOUCH ENGRAVING
Amonnt
266.13
613.93
94.43
221.93
22.13
219.83
113.13
128.43
338.63
289.13
102.48
327.63
143.93
65.93
213.43
263.43
89.81
169.43
115.09
276.43
87.91
87.92
68.33
117.88
349.65
23,835.00
53,463.75
307.80
281,678.00
-28,167.80
10,000.00
. 65.00
550,905.00
-55,090.50
276.56
1.76
6,069.22
8,650.00
1,286.35
3,500.00
464.21
930.38
277.48
277.48
41.33
400.00
45.60
19.14
13.94
515.20
49.14
1,800.00
231.12
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Cnrrent Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
3
Check No.
AP - 00206132
AP - 00206133
AP - 00206134
AP - 00206135
AP - 00206135
AP - 00206136
AP - 00206137
AP - 00206138
AP - 00206139
AP - 00206140
AP - 00206140
AP - 00206140
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206141
AP - 00206142
AP - 00206143
AP - 00206144
AP - 00206145
AP - 00206146
AP - 00206146
AP - 00206146
AP - 00206147
AP - 00206147
AP - 00206148
AP - 00206149
AP - 00206150
AP - 00206150
AP - 00206151
AP - 00206153
AP - 00206154
AP - 00206154
AP - 00206155
AP - 00206156
AP - 00206157
AP - 00206159
AP - 00206159
AP - 00206159
AP - 00206160
AP - 00206161
AP - 00206162
AP - 00206163
AP - 00206164
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206165
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
1/28/2004 GEIGER, VERNON
1/28/2004 GILLI, CHRIS
1/28/2004 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS
1/28/2004 GRAINGER, WW
1/28/2004 GRAINGER, WW
1/28/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN
1/28/2004 HAPPY ELVES DECORATING
1/28/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY
1/28/2004 ill STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE
1/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
1/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
1/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOTIGECF
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF
1/28/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF
1/28/2004 HOSE MAN INC
1/28/2004 HURST, CHERYL
1/28/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC
1/28/2004 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS
1/28/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY
1/28/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY
1/28/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY
1/28/2004 INTRA V AlA ROCK AND SAND
1/28/2004 INTRA V AlA ROCK AND SAND
1/28/2004 JOBS AVAILABLE
1/28/2004 JW'S AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
1/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC
1/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC
1/28/2004 KC PRINTING & GRAPillCS INC
1/28/2004 KOTZIN AND ASSOCIATES, R
1/28/2004 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC
1/28/2004 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC
1/28/2004 KSP A AM
1/28/2004 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD
1/28/2004 LEIFFER, LUKAS
1/28/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION
1/28/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION
1/28/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION
1/28/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT
1/28/2004 LOWER, DARLENE
1/28/2004 LT EXCAVATING INC
1/28/2004 LV'S LIGHTHOUSE INC
1/28/2004 MAHMOND, MOHAMED
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
65.00
183.00
1,148.00
199.78
168.49
136.40
4,455.00
260.50
116.89
35.34
62.80
163.57
7.39
15.52
28.61
10.61
59.78
29.39
110.61
288.50
37.70
373.97
30.71
107.75
78.12
30.00
261.76
110.40
200.00
56,193.96
1,650.88
2,104.36
629.45
3,480.00
3,132.00
557.75
1,296.75
182.25
1,662.50
17,410.75
2,630.85
60.00
251.00
5,000.00
6.56
40.00
3,379.68
4,656.03
1,159.84
2,664.31
119.79
8,073.52
16,488.79
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAlT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Curreut Date: 02110/20C
Time: 14:22:4
if
Check No.
AP - 00206165
AP - 00206166
AP - 00206167
AP - 00206169
AP - 00206171
AP - 00206172
AP - 00206173
AP - 00206174
AP - 00206175
AP - 00206176
AP - 00206177
AP - 00206179
AP - 00206180
AP - 00206181
AP - 00206182
AP - 00206183
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206185
AP - 00206186
AP - 00206186
AP - 00206186
AP - 00206186
AP - 00206186
AP - 00206187
AP - 00206187
AP - 00206188
AP - 00206189
AP - 00206191
AP - 00206193
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC
1/28/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
1/28/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
1/28/2004 M1GLORIN1, ERNIE
1/28/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR
1/28/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS
1/28/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS
1/28/2004 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH
1/28/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC
1/28/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED
1/28/2004 NATIONS RENT
1/28/2004 NGUYEN, LE HANG
1/28/2004 NGUYEN, QUANG
1/28/2004 N1KPOUR, MOHAMMED
1/28/2004 NIKPOUR, SHIRIN
1/28/2004 NJUGUNA, SAMMY
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT
1/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
1/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
1/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
1/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPL Y HARDWARE
1/28/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
1/28/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC
1/28/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC
1/28/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA
1/28/2004 PARAGON BUli.DING PRODUCTS INC
1/28/2004 PASMA SOUTH CHAPTER
1/28/2004 PEP BOYS
Amount
7,975.13
64.87
170.15
90.00
11.26
8.31
138.44
75.00
35.00
23,495.27
13.47
90.00
90.00
360.00
225.00
105.00
118.76
57.19
237.86
39.66
9.83
87.34
110.83
4.81
182.33
58.70
48.65
137.46
185.22
495.83
24.52
33.50
17.39
34.37
68.17
100.00
-12.63
12.63
29.16
24.11
223.86
8.89
19.69
157.61
34.58
48.65
9.84
60.54
290.39
56,950.86
200.57
75.00
97.42
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/1 0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
5
Check No.
AP - 00206195
AP - 00206196
AP - 00206197
AP - 00206197
AP - 00206198
AP - 00206198
AP - 00206199
AP - 0020620 I
AP - 00206202
AP - 00206203
AP - 00206203
AP - 00206204
AP - 00206205
AP - 00206206
AP - 00206207
AP - 00206208
AP - 00206209
AP - 00206211
AP - 00206211
AP - 00206211
AP - 00206212
AP - 00206213
AP - 00206213
AP - 00206213
AP - 00206214
AP - 00206214
AP - 00206214
AP - 00206215
AP - 00206216
AP - 00206217
AP - 00206218
AP - 00206218
AP - 00206220
AP - 00206220
AP - 00206220
AP - 00206220
AP - 00206221
AP - 00206222
AP - 00206223
AP - 00206224
AP - 00206224
AP - 00206225
AP - 00206226
AP - 00206230
AP - 00206231
AP - 00206232
AP - 00206234
AP - 00206234
AP - 00206235
AP - 00206236
AP - 00206237
AP - 00206238
AP - 00206238
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Reeister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amonnt
1/28/2004 PERRY, MARK A
1/28/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC
1/28/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO
1/28/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO
1/28/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI
1/28/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI
1/28/2004 PORAC
1/28/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
1/28/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE
1/28/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
1/28/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
1/28/2004 PVC ASSOCIATION
1/28/2004 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING
1/28/2004 QUlNTANA,ZITA
1/28/2004 RADULESCU, DAN
1/28/2004 RADULESCU, ELIADE
1/28/2004 RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT CO
1/28/2004 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE
1/28/2004 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE
1/28/2004 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE
1/28/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA
1/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
1/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
1/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
1/28/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
1/28/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
1/28/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
1/28/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT
1/28/2004 RMA GROUP
1/28/2004 ROC-LOC
1/28/2004 ROC-LOC
1/28/2004 ROC-LOC
1/28/2004 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
1/28/2004 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
1/28/2004 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
1/28/2004 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
1/28/2004 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN"
1/28/2004 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT P A YMEN
1/28/2004 SAN BERN COUNTY
1/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK:
1/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK:
1/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
1/28/2004 SANCHEZ, JOSEPH
1/28/2004 SHAH, PANKAJ
1/28/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
1/28/2004 SIERRA SPRINGS
1/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
1/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
1/28/2004 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE
1/28/2004 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES
1/28/2004 SMART AND FINAL
1/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
1/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
40.00
45.00
7,700.42
4,923.22
105.49
345.96
240.00
183.87
13,546.94
7.00
7.00
150.00
34.48
193.00
100.00
180.00
250.00
43.10
75.43
4.82
282.50
404.25
368.00
288.09
41.21
515.58
375.29
226.00
4,904.00
5,900.12
9,695.00
-969.50
221.75
111.00
221.75
221.75
289.68
233.50
102,825.00
61,334.37
20,304.90
25,667.60
39.51
500.00
115.00
135.00
849.95
256.97
250.00
390.00
33.09
506.89
976.64
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
~
Check No.
AP - 00206238
AP - 00206239
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Reeister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
1/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
1/28/2004 SOCIALTECH INC
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1,489.34
250.00
41.03
46.57
4,192.98
100.80
13.47
13.33
13.33
131.80
50.49
90.19
47.00
12.90
13.65
12.90
13.27
13.47
12.90
12.90
13.43
13.43
114.72
13.00
12.90
15.05
13.37
12.90
13.47
12.11
13.76
13.76
127.37
13.76
13.76
12.27
177.08
52.79
13.43
17.34
13.65
23.82
106.09
22.04
17.97
13.00
13.27
13.00
53.43
1,612.29
193.77
38.42
12.90
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02l1O/20C
Time: 14:22:4
7
Check No.
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
Amount
19.16
13.37
54.32
30.97
13.33
40.42
74.30
92.50
13.33
21.75
21.75
16.52
161.81
78.21
23.83
13.33
12.90
12.90
12.90
13.76
58.29
12.90
12.90
22.94
13.60
33.08
14.22
13.76
12.90
12.90
12.90
13.76
14.59
24.20
15.81
12.90
12.90
162.20
164.31
12.90
12.90
97.94
13.90
14.13
12.90
72.11
14.08
13.33
12.90
28.06
12.90
12.90
117.oJ
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
g
Check No.
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
Amount
tl1.77
161.53
43.43
478.76
151.04
18.07
13.90
13.90
13.33
12.90
13.33
13.47
13.65
13.65
214.99
41.55
67.41
12.90
64.61
13.60
40.61
16.52
12.90
12.90
13.33
12.90
3,007.84
14.19
13.76
49.32
61.42
tlO.08
13.27
51.71
12.90
10.15
13.60
109.88
127.96
137.43
107.77
13.33
13.00
73.19
12.90
99.70
12.90
12.90
13.76
52.50
13.76
29.58
17.08
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 021l0/2OC
Timeq 14:22:4
Check No.
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206246
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/2812004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/2812004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
Amount
12.90
14.22
13.60
73.92
13.86
12.90
13.33
13.00
13.33
17.34
49.17
26.99
12.90
12.90
12.90
13.37
13.00
104.13
136.58
92.87
97.22
18.71
12.90
15.49
15.65
24.48
13.76
137.89
121.64
13.80
13.00
13.90
12.90
13.96
12.90
12.90
12.90
13.65
12.90
49.17
76.21
12.90
14.33
13.72
14.60
13.76
18.09
19,429.89
14,992.80
4,212.90
44.24
2,727.75
2,868.67
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
It>
Check No.
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206247
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206248
AP - 00206249
AP - 00206250
AP - 00206251
AP - 00206252
AP - 00206253
AP - 00206254
AP - 00206255
AP - 00206256
AP - 00206256
AP - 00206257
AP - 00206257
AP - 00206257
AP - 00206258
AP - 00206260
AP - 00206262
AP - 00206263
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206264
AP - 00206265
AP - 00206266
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
1/28/2004 SOUTHWEST SAFETY CONGRESS
1/28/2004 SPARKLETTS
1/28/2004 SPECTRA CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES
1/28/2004 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC
1/28/2004 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE
1/28/2004 STETKEVICH, OREST
1/28/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH
1/28/2004 SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
1/28/2004 SULLY-MaLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
1/28/2004 SUNGARD Bl TECH INC
1/28/2004 SUNGARD BI TECH INC
1/28/2004 SUNGARD BI TECH INC
1/28/2004 SURE SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
1/28/2004 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
1/28/2004 TOMARK SPORTS INC
1/28/2004 TRIVINO, GUILLERMO M
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1/28/2004 TUNNICLIFF, JAN
1/28/2004 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID
Amonnt
12,120.96
181.47
39,705.56
26.13
45.73
153.27
50.06
41.81
2,280.02
44.95
6,572.18
5,946.86
464.70
2,629.16
195.00
84.00
1,484.00
322.22
403.83
130.00
16.00
836,951.76
-83,695.18
3,450.00
1,912.50
448.80
216.00
448.15
924.70
65.00
1,628.38
3,768.87
2,552.37
2,725.00
4,437.50
5,650.00
1,325.00
17,019.00
20,862.99
60,185.68
18,238.33
48.72
15,415.77
13,247.56
581.00
241.69
32.50
45.00
748.17
529.51
250.50
65.00
8,000.00
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Cnrrent Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
II
Check No.
AP - 00206267
AP - 00206267
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206268
AP - 00206271
AP - 00206271
AP - 00206273
AP - 00206274
AP - 00206278
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206279
AP - 00206280
AP - 00206281
AP - 00206282
AP - 00206283
AP - 00206283
AP - 00206284
AP - 00206284
AP - 00206284
AP - 00206285
AP - 00206287
AP - 00206288
AP - 00206290
AP - 00206290
AP - 00206290
AP - 00206291
AP - 00206292
AP - 00206293
AP - 00206294
AP - 00206295
AP - 00206296
AP - 00206297
AP - 00206298
AP - 00206298
AP - 00206298
AP - 00206298
AP - 00206298
AP - 00206299
AP - 00206299
AP - 00206299
AP - 00206299
AP - 00206299
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
Amount
1/28/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
1/28/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INe.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INe.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INe.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INe.
1/28/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INe.
1/28/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
1/28/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
1/28/2004 UNITED WAY
1/28/2004 UPS
1/28/2004 VEND U COMPANY
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VERIZON
1/28/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE
1/28/2004 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA
1/28/2004 VOLM, LIZA
1/28/2004 VULCAN MATERIALS
1/28/2004 VULCAN MATERIALS
1/28/2004 W AXlE
1/28/2004 W AXlE
1/28/2004 W AXlE
1/28/2004 WHITE, LARRY
1/28/2004 WINSTAR DEVELOPMENT
1/28/2004 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN AND SMART
1/28/2004 XEROX CORPORATION
1/28/2004 XEROX CORPORATION
1/28/2004 XEROX CORPORATION
1/28/2004 YEE, LARRY
1/28/2004 YORK INDUSTRIES
1/28/2004 ZWISSLER, JAMES
1/29/2004 JONES, BOB
1/29/2004 MALOOF FOUNDATION, SAM & ALFREDA
1/29/2004 US POSTMASTER
1/29/2004 JONES, BOB
1/29/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
1/29/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
1/29/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INe.
1/29/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
1/29/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
1/29/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL
1/29/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL
1/29/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL
1/29/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL
1/29/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL
480.00
2,449.50
176.77
288.77
248.00
272. 77
256.00
312.00
176.00
2,627.35
22,332.50
580.32
20.74
69.70
28.24
28.24
28.46
29.22
56.48
56.48
20.73
29.22
357.00
6,930.63
112.50
34.24
32.40
20.89
314.29
81.22
180.00
3,000.00
3,091.81
150.53
150.53
1,794.04
189.00
1,191.25
60.00
2,112.00
25,000.00
500.00
2,240.00
166.31
13.03
103.76
21.55
83.08
275.00
549.00
260.00
549.00
260.00
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/2OC
Time: 14:22:4
12
Check No.
AP - 00206301
AP - 00206301
AP - 00206302
AP - 00206303
AP - 00206303
AP - 00206303
AP - 00206303
AP - 00206305
AP - 00206309
AP - 00206310
AP - 00206311
AP - 00206312
AP - 00206313
AP - 00206314
AP - 00206315
AP - 00206317
AP - 00206318
AP - 00206320
AP - 00206320
AP - 00206321
AP - 00206322
AP - 00206322
AP - 00206323
AP - 00206325
AP - 00206326
AP - 00206327
AP - 00206327
AP - 00206328
AP - 00206328
AP - 00206330
AP - 00206331
AP - 00206333
AP - 00206334
AP - 00206335
AP - 00206336
AP - 00206337
AP - 00206338
AP - 00206339
AP - 00206340
AP - 00206341
AP - 00206342
AP - 00206342
AP - 00206343
AP - 00206344
AP - 00206345
AP - 00206346
AP - 00206347
AP - 00206348
AP - 00206348
AP - 00206349
AP - 00206349
AP - 00206349
AP - 00206350
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
A AND A AUTOMOTIVE
A AND A AUTOMOTIVE
ABBA, NATE
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABLAC
ALPHAGRAPHICS
ALT A LOMA CHARTER LINES
AL T A LOMA I AND II JOINT VENTURE
AMC
AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
AQUINO, GrOV ANNA
ARAMARK
ASSI SECURITY
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS
AUFBAU CORPORATION
AUFBAU CORPORATION
AUTO SPECIALISTS
B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC
BERCH, ANNA
BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC
BILL BLMlCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND
BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND
BISHOP COMPANY
BISHOP COMPANY
BOTTLE FREE WATER CO.
BOWER, PAT
BROWN, NANCY
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
BUSINESS SPECIALTIES
CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE
CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK INe.
CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY
CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL
CAMEO PACIFIC
CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
CARL WARREN & COMPANY
CARL WARREN & COMPANY
CENTEX HOMES
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT
CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES
CHARLIE T ADEMA INC
CHARLIE T ADEMA INC
CHARTER MEDIA
CHARTER MEDIA
CHARTER MEDIA
CHRISTIAN, KATIE
175.16
77.19
38.25
630.56
654.22
35.56
248.65
16.39
345.Q7
521.30
35,176.70
3,907.00
187.00
40.00
1,279.50
105.00
340.50
21,016.00
20,720.00
458.97
64.19
479.06
3,048.00
51.00
68.00
100.00
300.00
633.56
61.41
719.78
85.00
85.00
13.97
844.29
354.45
7,140.00
7.00
355.50
15.00
14.65
184.76
267.16
25,327.82
721.20
3,918.00
5,014.03
38.79
1,395.00
1,388.80
326.00
715.00
827.00
85.00
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
/3
Check No.
AP - 00206351
AP - 00206352
AP - 00206353
AP - 00206354
AP - 00206355.
AP - 00206357
AP - 00206357
AP - 00206357
AP - 00206357
AP - 00206359
AP - 00206360
AP - 00206361
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/2812004 through 2/912004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
214/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
Amount
CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC
CLABBY, SANDRA
CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC.
COAST RECREATION INC
COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS
COPP CRUSlllNG CORP, DAN
COX, JULIE
CREATIVE WHOLESALE
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
120.00
1,000.00
18.37
190.32
117.91
522.00
93.00
50.00
229.02
10.00
98.00
67.72
230.83
49.68
85.98
2,078.83
149.33
139.43
212.13
741.13
234.13
318.80
1,032.09
360.63
80.48
40.88
249.58
107.73
572.43
63.88
73.60
73.60
700.53
824.91
824.91
229.73
73.60
176.75
156.D3
989.43
55.20
81.33
79.13
29.83
84.63
54.08
237.43
29.83
35.38
55.20
21.03
113.13
134.13
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02110120C
Time: 14:22:4
IL/
Check No.
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206364
AP - 00206365
AP - 00206366
AP - 00206367
AP - 00206367
AP - 00206367
AP - 00206368
AP - 00206369
AP - 00206370
AP - 00206371
AP - 00206372
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Remster
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST
CUCAMONGA RIDGE 159 AFXXV LLC
CURRAN, TONYA
CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC
DAVENPORT, JAY E.
DE LEISE, JENAE
DEJESUS, ANA
DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
74.88
108.83
471.73
84.88
281.43
73.60
151.48
372.73
377.23
216.63
133.03
55.18
129.63
291.33
109.83
135.13
199.03
121.93
161.53
38.68
116.87
105.43
742.33
43.08
58.48
73.60
162.63
195.73
170.33
394.89
32.68
70.48
284.73
129.63
1,039.23
127.78
105.53
78.28
296.83
163.83
109.36
109.37
128.53
1,000.00
68.00
3,500.00
350.00
1,610.00
395.00
519.24
200.00
33,998.44
75.30
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
/5
Check No.
AP - 00206373
AP - 00206375
AP - 00206376
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206377
AP - 00206379
AP - 00206380
AP - 00206380
AP - 00206381
AP - 00206382
AP - 00206383
AP - 00206384
AP - 00206385
AP - 00206386
AP - 00206386
AP - 00206386
AP - 00206386
AP - 00206386
AP - 00206387
AP - 00206388
AP - 00206389
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206390
AP - 00206392
AP - 00206393
AP - 00206395
AP - 00206396
AP - 00206397
AP - 00206398
AP - 00206401
AP - 00206401
AP - 00206402
AP - 00206403
AP - 00206404
AP - 00206406
AP - 00206407
AP - 00206407
AP - 00206407
AP - 00206407
AP - 00206408
AP - 00206409
AP - 00206410
AP - 00206411
AP - 00206412
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!enda Check Rel!ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK
DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING
EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC
ETIW ANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ETIW ANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
EVANS SPORTING GOODS
FARMER KRICHBAUM, LISA
FASTFRAME
FATLAND, SANDRA
FAUST PRINTING INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEITH, JOHN
FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC
FILARSKY AND WATT
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FIRST HOTEL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
FIRST PLACE TROPHIES
FOREMOST
FORTUNE
GADABOUT TOURS INC
GAMALINDA, DENNIS G.
GEOGRAPHICS
GEOGRAPHICS
GIRON, SABINO
GLOBALCOMPUTERSUPPLlliS
GOLDN WEST SURPLUS
GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A
GRAINGER, WW
GRAINGER, WW
GRAINGER, WW
GRAINGER, WW
GREENWOOD'S UNIFORMS
GRIFFITH, DIANE
GUARDIAN
GUERRA, JENNIFER
HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO
313.56
134.69
500.00
7,240.50
11,766.85
20,739.10
19,929.30
5,432.75
25,877.75
31.03
367.50
682.50
332.90
46.00
1,339.Dl
150.00
725.37
19.63
22.12
13.21
31.16
218.79
150.00
1,496.08
6,330.60
651.00
486.00
652.50
870.00
486.00
464.60
1,386.00
79,910.37
518.55
3,202.55
19.99
100.00
200.00
2,893.09
632.49
10.00
121.83
333.00
2,500.00
668.41
150.11
231.65
62.35
96.20
55.00
2,384.21
160.00
556.17
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Curreut Date: 02l1O/2OC
Time: 14:22:4
/~
Check No.
AP - 00206412
AP - 00206413
AP - 00206414
AP - 00206415
AP - 00206416
AP - 00206417
AP - 00206418
AP - 00206419
AP - 00206420
AP - 00206420
AP - 00206420
AP - 00206420
AP - 00206421
AP - 00206422
AP - 00206422
AP - 00206422
AP - 00206423
AP - 00206424
AP - 00206425
AP - 00206425
AP - 00206426
AP - 00206427
AP - 00206428
AP - 00206429
AP - 00206430
AP - 00206430
AP - 00206431
AP - 00206431
AP - 00206432
AP - 00206434
AP - 00206435
AP - 00206436
AP - 00206437
AP - 00206438
AP - 00206438
AP - 00206439
AP - 00206440
AP - 00206440
AP - 00206440
AP - 00206440
AP - 00206440
AP - 00206441
AP - 00206441
AP - 00206442
AP - 00206442
AP - 00206442
AP - 00206442
AP - 00206442
AP - 00206443
AP - 00206444
AP - 00206445
AP - 00206446
AP - 00206447
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Reeister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
214/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO
HACIENDA HOTEL
HALL & FOREMAN INC
HAPPY ELVES DECORATING
HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY
HARTMAN, JUDITH
HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL
HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH
HOME DEPOT/GECF
HOME DEPOT/GECF
HOME DEPOT/GECF
HOME DEPOT/GECF
HOMESAFE INC
HOSE MAN INC
HOSE MAN INC
HOSE MAN INC
INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS
INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP
JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC
JIMENEZ, CESAR
JOHNSON, STACI
JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF
JONES AND MA YER LAW OFFICES OF
KEITH COMPANIES, THE
KEITH COMPANIES, THE
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES
LEGACY
LEIFFER, LUKAS
LERN
LILBURN CORPORATION
LOPEZ, MILA
LOPEZ, MILA
LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO
MARK CHRIS INC
MARK CHRIS INC
MARK CHRIS INC
MARK CHRIS INC
MARK CHRIS INC
MARSHALL PLUMBING
MARSHALL PLUMBING
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
MASTERCRAFf
MCDERMOTT, GENEVIEVE
MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
MILLER, JODI
MIMIS CAFE
99.89
211.68
1,000.00
4,050.00
749.02
40.00
1,257.80
2,000.00
156.88
607.72
38.60
34.58
500.00
183.18
76.63
366.35
2,500.00
82.43
83.79
106.73
362.00
65.20
100.00
150.00
1,937.50
1,350.00
7,408.50
358.10
2,540.00
162.20
139.50
295.00
587.00
100.00
100.00
1,563.36
141.52
576.39
46.07
118.08
546.73
141.00
109.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
51,816.33
48.00
130.00
150.00
240.00
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAlT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
/7
Check No.
AP - 00206448
AP - 00206449
AP - 00206450
AP - 00206451
AP - 00206452
AP - 00206453
AP - 00206453
AP - 00206454
AP - 00206455
AP - 00206456
AP - 00206456
AP - 00206456
AP - 00206456
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206457
AP - 00206458
AP - 00206459
AP - 00206459
AP - 00206459
AP - 00206462
AP - 00206463
AP - 00206464
AP - 00206465
AP - 00206467
AP - 00206468
AP - 00206469
AP - 00206470
AP - 00206470
AP - 00206470
AP - 00206472
AP - 00206473
AP - 00206474
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Reeister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
MOSLEY, VEDA
MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR
NAKAI, KULWINDER
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC
NATIONAL DEFERRED
NELSON, KODY
NELSON, KODY
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS
NYO CHO, SUNG
o C B REPROGRAPIDCS INC
o C B REPROGRAPHICS INC
o C B REPROGRAPHICS INC
o C B REPROGRAPIDCS INC
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
ORTEGA, MARIA RACHEL
OTT,LAURA
OTT, LAURA
OTT, LAURA
PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC
PANDA DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION (
PANDA DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION (
PATRICK, KAREN
PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
PUN, HENRY
R AND R AUTOMOTIVE
RAND R AUTOMOTIVE
R AND R AUTOMOTIVE
R J M SIGNS INC
RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS
RAMIREZ, DENISE
60.75
480.01
148.24
128.45
10,129.69
62.00
34.00
46.28
111.42
125.96
42.15
34.30
30.00
47.32
35.87
239.97
2.87
-5.26
534.32
18.55
205.35
123.91
2.49
94.82
23.58
58.70
12.18
111.41
56.46
17.67
734.78
-10.29
123.49
34.59
28.84
77.64
111.00
261.00
94.25
90.00
71.44
16,524.10
21,040.75
110.00
475.34
6.81
169.41
241.58
247.84
127.98
529.00
109.00
88.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/1O/20C
Time: 14:22:4
/g
Check No.
AP - 00206475
AP - 00206475
AP - 00206476
AP - 00206477
AP - 00206478
AP - 00206480
AP - 00206480
AP - 00206480
AP - 00206481
AP - 00206483
AP - 00206483
AP - 00206486
AP - 00206486
AP - 00206486
AP - 00206486
AP - 00206487
AP - 00206488
AP - 00206488
AP - 00206488
AP - 00206489
AP - 00206489
AP - 00206489
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206490
AP - 00206491
AP - 00206491
-AP - 00206492
AP - 00206493
AP - 00206494
AP - 00206496
AP - 00206497
AP - 00206498
AP - 00206499
AP - 00206499
AP - 00206499
AP - 00206502
AP - 00206502
AP - 00206503
AP - 00206503
AP - 00206504
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
1/28/2004 through 2/912004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
214/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
214/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
Amount
RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY
RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY
RC HOMES LLC
RCPFA
RED WING SHOE STORE
RH TECHNOLOGY
RH TECHNOLOGY
RH TECHNOLOGY
RHODES, SHARON
RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES
RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES
ROBLES SR, RAUL P
ROBLES SR, RAUL P
ROBLES SR, RAUL P
ROBLES SR, RAUL P
S AND K ENGINEERS
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR(
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR(
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR(
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC
SANTOS, ISABEL
SAPIEN, RAMON
SARES REGIS GROUP
SCHNEIDERS, CHERYL
SECAS, MANUEL
SEGOVIA, OSCAR
SENCHAL, CAL
SENCHAL, CAL
SENCHAL, CAL
SMART AND FINAL
SMART AND FINAL
SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES
SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES
SONSATIONAL ACTIVITIES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
36.10
22.63
230,307.46
6,300.99
137.37
1,023.00
1,056.00
792.00
35.00
81,000.00
1,000.00
60.00
85.00
60.00
60.00
400.00
110.00
110.00
716.80
288.00
288.00
384.00
41,846.64
46,318.80
45,209.63
30,457.24
35,912.60
40,547.20
635.73
773.65
76.00
30.00
713.00
20.00
40.00
54.00
224.00
52.50
79.00
20.03
41.34
1,500.00
1,500.00
100.00
18,717.78
26.15
46.60
404.53
54.88
14.71
112.86
13.43
139.47
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
/1
Check No.
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507 .
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aeenda Check Reeister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
Amount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
13.33
85.93
652.88
14.19
13.17
13.76
160.10
109.10
193.49
14.13
16.52
207.37
115.73
120.53
12.90
12,493.44
110.15
14.19
121.42
14.88
3.63
13.64
110.37
12.90
13.47
13.38P14.11
96.23
101.98
28.59
22.92
168.36
129.81
14.66
92.56
15.05
19.78
19.78
3,343.73
44.24
92.05
21.75
225.24
16.53
13.76
13.33
13.33
471.54
12.90
131.24
107.69
200.87
14.51
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02/l0/20C
Time: 14:22:4
2tJ
Check No.
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206507
AP - 00206508
AP - 00206509
AP - 00206510
AP - 00206511
AP - 00206513
AP - 00206514
AP - 00206515
AP - 00206516
AP - 00206519
AP - 00206519
AP - 00206519
AP - 00206521
AP - 00206521
AP - 00206521
AP - 00206523
AP - 00206525
AP - 00206526
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206527
AP - 00206528
AP - 00206528
AP - 00206529
AP - 00206529
AP - 00206530
AP - 00206531
AP - 00206531
AP - 00206532
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
AP - 00206533
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
1/2812004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT.
SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS
SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
STATE OF CA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS
STERICYCLE INC
STRACENER, JUNISE
STRAUGHTER, PARIS
T AND D INSTALLATIONS
T AND D INSTALLATIONS
T AND D INSTALLATIONS
TARGET
TARGET
TARGET
TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC
TUCKER, THOMAS E AND JOYCE A
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
UNlFIRSTUNIFORMSERV~E
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P,
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR p,
UNIQUE CREATIONS
UNIQUE CREATIONS
UNITED WAY
UPS
UPS
V AN DAMME, KELLY
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
VERIZON
Amount
69.81
13.81
23.99
94.31
13.76
12.90
4,875.00
332.00
281.82
269.86
2,211.25
233.00
200.00
144.50
788.66
292.52
1,150.94
71.40
-49.95
59.45
378.00
5,144.71
40,154.70
37.07
158.32
21.65
491.60
119.24
37.07
52.97
27.59
494.84
119.24
2,625.92
22,320.36
84.96
150.53
49.00
17.64
26.60
95.00
20.73
49.97
24.50
20.73
20.84
22.96
295.90
20.73
29.22
28.24
29.22
20.73
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 02!lO/20C
Time: 14:22:4
2/
Check No.
AP - 00206534
AP - 00206535
AP - 00206537
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206538
AP - 00206539
AP - 00206540
AP - 00206540
AP - 00206541
AP - 00206542
AP - 00206543
AP - 00206544
AP - 00206545
AP - 00206546
AP - 00206549
AP - 00206550
AP - 00206551
AP - 00206552
AP - 00206553
AP - 00206553
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Al!:enda Check Rel!:ister
1/28/2004 through 2/9/2004
Check Date Vendor Name
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/4/2004
2/412004
2/4/2004
2/9/2004
2/9/2004
Amount
VIDEO GUYS
VIGILANCE, TERRENCE
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WAXIE
WAXIE
WAXIE
W AXlE
WAXIE
W AXlE
WAXIE
WffiTNEY, SHARON
WHITTIER FERTILIZER
WHITTIER FERTILIZER
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
WILLIAMS, VALENCIA
WILLIAMSON, KELLY
WILSON, CHARLES
WILSON, GA YBRALLA
WINDROW ELEMENTARY
YORK INDUSTRIES
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
ZERO WASTE COMMUNITIES/COUNTY OF SB
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO
LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
LOWE'S COMPANIES INC.
33.62
303.45
428.92
1,150.54
290.28
333.00
189.54
143.65
34.48
61.62
54.00
614.18
526.90
76,227.50
50.00
100.00
500.00
76.00
178.43
47.18
617.21
40.00
618.82
61.26
591.89
5,258,048.62
5,258,048.62
Total for Check ID AP:
Total for Entity:
User: AHA WORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG]ORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Cnrrent Date: 02/1 OI2OC
Time: 14:22:4
22
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2004
YTM
365 Equlv,
.528
2.180
1.025
3.319
YTM
360 Equlv.
.507
2.150
1.011
3.274
Days to
Maturity
575
31
.268
Term
733
41
,532
%01
Portfolio
9.62
0.93
3.05
76.40
Book
Value
32,083,155.84
,515,000.00
4,994,248.6
24,922,361.25
Market
Value
32,083,155.84
1,523,367.65
5,000,000.00
24,987,036.43
Po,
Value
32,063,155.84
1,515,000.00
5,000.000.00
125,000,000.00
Investments
Local Agency Investment Funds
Certificates of OepositJNeg. . Bank
Commercial Paper. Discount
Federal Agency Issues. Coupon
2.887
0.500
2.848
0.493
975
1,178
100.00%
163,514,765.70
808,675.73
11,434.44
-
820,110.17
163,593,559.92
808,675.73
,434.44
820,110.17
163,598,155.84
808,675.73
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking
(not induded in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Subtotal
Total Cash and Investments
2.887
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 400,068.67 2,593,488.54
Ave,age Dally Balance 164,103,381.35, 158,579,721.27
Effective Rate of Return 2.87% 2.78%
I certify that this report accurately reflects ail City pooled investments and is in comformfty with the investment policy adopted March 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month.end market values
were obtained from (IDC).lnteractive Data Corporation pricing service.
2.848
975
,178
164,334,875.87
164,413,670.09
164,406.831.57
under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided
govern the management of these funds.
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF _PM1) SymRept V6.21
Report Ver. 5.00
15:03
Run Date: 0211012004
N
~
Page 2
Slated YTM Days to Maturity
Book Value Rate Moody'a 360 MalUrity Date
32,083,155.84 1.528 .007 1
--
32,083,155.84 1.507 1
1,515.000.00 2.150 2.150 575 08129/2005
---
1,515,000.00 2.100 575
4,994,248.61 1.010 1.011 31 0310312OO4
---
4.994,248.61 1.011 31
2,000,000.00 5.200 5.129 1,191 05107/2007
7,000,000.00 3.180 3.136 1 ,135 0311212007
2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 1,569 05119/2008
2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 1 ,584 06103I2OO8
5,500,000.00 2._ 2.407 1 ,132 0310912007
2.000,000.00 3.375 3.329 1.464 02104I2OO8
2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 1 .289 0811312007
1,996,562.50 3.370 3.370 1,331 09/2412007
3.000.000.00 3.625 3.575 1,353 1011612007
3.000,000.00 3.010 2.969 1,181 04/2712007
2.000,000.00 3.170 3.127 1 ,194 0511 012007
2.000,000.00 3.970 3.916 1,598 0611712008
2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 137 0611712004
5,000,000.00 2.650 2.614 1,226 0611112007
3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 1 ,139 0311612007
2.000,000.00 2.625 2.589 1,234 0611912007
2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 1,333 0912612007
3.000,000.00 2.540 2.506 1 .170 0411612007
2.000,000.00 3.200 3.205 1.289 0811312007
3.000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,730 1012712008
2,000.000.00 3.355 3.310 1.366 1012912OO7
2,000,000.00 3.320 3.275 1,366 1012f312OO7
4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,569 0511912008
3.000,000.00 2.500 2.466 1,031 1112B12OO6
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF _PM2) SymRept V6.21
Report Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2004
LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
- -
Subtotal and Average 35,111.057.47
Bank
BANK OF AMERICA
Subtotal and Average
Market Value
Par Value
Purchase
Date
Average
Balance
Issue,
CUSlP Investment ,
-
Local Agencylnvesbnent Funds
SYS00005 00005
32,083,155.84
32,083,155.84
32,083,155.84
32,083,155.84
08/27/2003
Certificates of DeposltINeg.
O605OE6Q3 1226
,523.367.65
1,523,367.65
,515,000.00
1,515,000.00
0112212004
1,515,000.00
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO
Subtotal and Average 1,611,047.94
Discount
246
Commercial Paper-
4S974MC30
5.000.000.00
5,000,000.00
2,021,250.00
7,013,125.00
2,480,468.75
1,989,375.00
5,457,031.25
2,000,000.00
3,007,500.00
2,016,875.00
3,015,000.00
3,017,812.50
2,018,125.00
2,006,200.00
3,057,187.00
4,968,700.00
2,975.625.00
1,985,000.00
1,963,750.00
2,980,312.50
2,001,250.00
3.037,500.00
2,014,375.00
2,015,625.00
5,019,125.37
2,991,930.08
5,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
7,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
2.000.000.00
5.500.000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000.000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000.000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2.000.000.00
3.000,000.00
5,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000.000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000.000.00
2,000,000.00
2.000,000.00
5,000,000.00
3,000.000.00
0510712002
03112/2003
0511912003
Q6,I03/2OO3
06109I2OO3
08104/2003
0811312003
09/2412003
1 0/1612003
10127/2003
11/1012003
12/1712003
06117/1999
Q6,112/2003
Q6,116/2003
Q6,11912OO3
06/26/2003
07/16/2003
0811312003
10127/2003
0112912004
0112912004
05119/2003
OS/28/2003
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331lM88 1127
31331QTY3 1190
31331QK55 1199
313310M79 1205
31331QN78 1207
3133106P7 1224
31331Q7C5 1226
31331TFG1 1231
31331TGY1 1234
31331TGV7 1236
31331THR5 1241
31331TND9 1244
3133M94JB 01050
31339XJJ4 1210
31339XB78 1211
31339XLB8 1212
31339XPL2 1213
31339YHGO 1218
3133X05Z8 1225
3133)(1P27 1237
3133X30XB 1247
3133X3E25 1248
3128X1BD8 1198
3128X1FG7 1203
15:03
Run Date: 0211012004
~
--.t::..
Page 3
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2004
Purchase
Date
Average
Balance
TIM Days to Maturity
360 Matu~1y Date
.396 1112B12OO7
,592 06/1112008
,226 06/1112007
959 09/1712006
1 ,725 1 012212OO8
1 ,241 00126I2OO7
787 0312912006
843 0512412006
1.209 OS/25/2007
1,261 07/1612007
1,640 07/25J12OO8
1 ,153 03130I2OO7
1 ,740 1110612OO8
1,020 11/1712006
1,045 12112/2006
1,268
975
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF _PM2) SymFlepI ve.21
3.058
2.995
2.367
2.782
4.048
3.566
5.259
5.632
2.479
2.466
3.289
3.006
4.192
3.205
3.255
3.274
2.848
Moody'a
3.100
3.030
2.400
2.600
4.010
3.550
5.300
5.710
2.500
2.500
3.300.
3.050
4.250
3.250
3.300
Stated
Book Value Rate
4,000,000.00
4,998.500.00
2,000,000.00
3,997.600.00
3,983.125.00
3,991,480.00
3,994.375.00
2.000.000.00
6.996,500.00
4.000,000.00
3,993,750.00
3.000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
124,922,361.25
163,514,765.70
Markel Value
3.997,023.92
4.946.109.n
1.971,213.99
4.026.083.98
4.056,076.05
3,981,348.27
4,025,000.00
2.027,500.00
6,938,750.00
3,955.000.00
3,993.750.00
3,007,500.00
3,000.937.50
2,001,250.00
2,006,250.00
124.987,036.43
163,593,559.92
Par Value
4,000,000.00
5,000.000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
7,000,000.00
4,000.000.00
4.000,000.00
3.000.000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
125.000,000.00
163,598,155.84
OS/2B12OO3
06/1212003
06/1212003
1 0108I2OO3
1110312003
1212612003
04104I2OO1
OS/2412001
05I2712fXJ3
07/1612003
07/25J12fXJ3
0913012OO3
1110612OO3
11/1712003
12/1212003
Isouo.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG AS5N
FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG AS5N
FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
124,984,659.64
164,103,381.35
CUSIP Investment'
-
Fede,al Agency Issues - Coupon
3128X1DKO 1204
3128X1JDO 1208
3128X1JN8 1209
3128X1L96 1233
3128X121<2 1239
3128X2GB5 1245
3136FOAL6 1085
3136FOLU4 1101
3136F3VQ6 1202
3136F3082 1219
3136F32F2 1222
3136F4lG7 1232
3136F4NR1 1240
3136F4RF3 1242
3136F4B45 1243
15:03
Run Date: 02I10t2004
l\.1
l1\
Page 4
Stated YTM Days to
Book Value Rate MoodY. 360M8lurlty
808,675.73 0.500 0.493 1
11,434.44 1
820,110.17
164,334,875.87 2.848 975
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF _PM2) SymAept VG.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Cash
January 31, 2004
Average Purchase
CUSlP Investment . Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value
- -
SavlngsIMlscellaneous Accounts
SVSOOI80 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 808.675.73 808,675.73
-
Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 11,434.44
Subtotal 820,110.17
- -
Total Cash and Investmentss 164,103,381.35 164,406,831.57 164,413,670.09
Run Oate: 02/1M004 .15:03
~
Page 5
Ending
Balance
- -
-
32,083,155.84 -
808,675.73
-
1,515,000.00
-
4,_,248.61
-
124,922,361.25
-
164,323,441.43
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF _PM3) SymAept V6.21
Report Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
January 1, 2004 through January 31, 2004
Redemptions
or WIthdrawals
Purchases
orOoposlls
Transaction
Date
Stated
Rate
Beginning
Balance
.528
0,400.000.00
10,400,000.00
11,231,074.97
11,231,074.97
0.500
Issuer
(Monthly Summary,
lOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
- -
Subtotal 31,252,080.87
(Monthly Summary)
BANK OF AMERICA
Subtotal
CUSlP Investment'
-
Local Agency InVesbnent Funds
SYSOOOOS ??oo5
SavlngsIMlscellaneous Accounts
SYSOOl80 00180
75,371.93
75,371.93
0.00
0.00
884,047.66
Bank
Certnlcates of DeposltlNeg.
1,515,000.00
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO
Subtotal 0.00
Subtotal
Discount
246
Commercial Paper
45974MC30
0.00
0.00
1,000,000.00
2.000,000.00
0.00
0.00
1,996,875.00
4,996,875.00
15,472,246.93
4,994,248.61
4,_,248.61
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
4,000.000.00
20,225,323.58
01/22/2004
01/2112004
01/26/2004
0112912004
01/29/2004
01/23/2004
.010
5.510
3.020
3.355
3.320
4.250
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAl NATL MTG A$SN
Subtotal
Total
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133M75D4 01038
3133X1NMS 1238
3133X3DX8 1247
3133X3E25 1248
3136F4NV2 1235
125,919,236.25
159,570,364.78
15:03
k1
-.....1
Run Date: 0211012004
Cost
Yield Value
0.42% $ 257,311.78
N/A
0.42% 242,878.03
N/A
0.50% 403.30
N/A -
$ 500,593.11
0.00% $ 0.04
N/A
0.42% 581.385.71
N/A
0.42% ,092,203.52
N/A
0.00%
N/A
0.00% 0.79
N/A
0.42% 60,371.66
N/A -
$ ,733.961.72
$ 2,234,554.83
2/10/2oo411:05AM
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
Fo, the Month Ended Decembe, 31, 2003
Trustee and/or
Pavina Aaent
Matu,ity
Dale
NIA"
N/A
N/A'
N/A
N/A
N/A
Purchase
Date
8/4/1997
N/A
8/4/1997
N/A
8/4/1997
N/A
Investment
erican Treasury Obligation
erican Treasury Obligation
AccountName
Imprvmnt Fund
Imprvmnt Fund
Reserve Fund
Reserve Fund
Redemp. Fund
Redemp. Fund
US Bank
Bond I~_sue
Assessment District No 93-1
Masi Plaza
N/A'
N/A
N/A.
N/A
N/A'
N/A
NIA"
N/A
N/A.
N/A
N/A'
N/A
7/1/1999
N/A
7/1/1999
N/A
7/1/1999
N/A
711/1999
N/A
3/2/2000
N/A
1/16/2001
N/A
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
First American Treasury Obligation
Cash
Expense Fund
Sub ResIV. Fund
Redemption Fund
Residual Fund
Sr. Resrv. Fund
Revenue Fund
US Bank
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series
& 1999 B (Subord)
999A (Sr
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS
Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
IfinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls
f\J
~
THE
C I T Y
o F
> - _....-" -
RANClIO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
February 9, 2004
Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, AI.C.P., City Manager
Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
REQUESTED EXPENDITURE OF $17,156.16 IN GRANT MONEY
PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC
SAFETY FOR SOBRIETY CHECKPOINT OVERTIME.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION
Approval to accept and expend grant revenue in the amount of $17,156.16 awarded
by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety for sobriety checkpoint overtime into
Fund 370, Account 4740, Expense 5005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The State of California Office of Traffic Safety has made available grant money to
municipalities to offset overtime costs incurred during sobriety checkpoints. The
overall goal of the project is to reduce the number of victims killed and injured as a
result of alcohol-involved crashes. Sobriety Checkpoints will be scheduled during
periods coinciding with the "You Drink & Drive, You Lose" national campaign during
the current fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT
None. The grant money will cover the money for sobriety checkpoint overtime.
29
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
( <,'~>;",>-
ENGINEERING DEP^RTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR
IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01 (TO BE BID AND
CONSTRUCTED AS ONE PROJECT), INCLUDING STREET, STORM
DRAIN, WATER FACILITIES, SEWER FACILITIES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS, LANDSCAPING AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS ON
FOOTHILL BLVD. BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVE. AND THE 1-15
FREEWAY, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS
16123035650/1442612-0 AND 16143035650/1442614-0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Foothill
Blvd. street improvements between Rochester Ave. and the 1-15 Freeway, and approve the
attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS:
The three phases requesting action on are part of the eleven-phase capital improvement
program, which will install the necessary infrastructure surrounding the Victoria Gardens
Mall. Phases 1B(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B) are those phases that improves Foothill Boulevard.
between Rochester Avenue on the west and the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Toward
achieving an 'economy of scale', the three phase will be bid as one construction project.
This bid will widen Foothill Boulevard to three lanes within this reach, construct necessary
.36
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Ph 1 Bb, 3Ba, and 3Bb for Foothill Blvd
February 18, 2004
Page 2
storm drain laterals, sewer laterals, and water mains - all of which are to the benefit of the
participants and non-participants to CFD's 2001-01 and 2003-01.
As stated above, the capital improvement program to install the necessary infrastructure
within the Victoria Gardens Mall sphere consists of 11 construction phases. The sphere
extends from Base Line Rd. on the north, Arrow Rte. and the 1-15 Freeway to the south, the
SC Edison transmission corridor to the west, and Etiwanda Ave. and 1-15 Freeway to the
east (see exhibit). The eleven phases are as follows:
# Phase Description Status
1 Ph 1A Day Creek Blvd. north of Church St and Church 81. west of Day Creek Blvd. Mass Complete
Grading of the residential area north of Church St. and water, sewer. traffic signals, and
major storm drain improvements
2 Ph 18(a) Day Creek Blvd. south of Church St., Church S1. east of Day Creek Blvd., Victoria Park Under construction
Lane north of Church St.,Arbor Ln. north of Church St., and Base Line Rd. east of Day
Creek Blvd. Also water, sewer, maior storm drain, landscapinQ and traffic signals.
3 Ph 18(b) North side of Foothill Blvd. west of Day Creek Blvd. In addition storm drain, sewer and Advertise
water.
4 Ph 18(c) Sidewalk and landscaoinn on Day Creek Blvd north of Church St. Award 2/18/04
5 Ph 18(d) Traffic Sional at Church St. and Etiwanda Ave Awaitina Caltrans Permit
6 Ph 18(e) Landscaoina on Arbor Ln. north of Church St. Completing design
7 Ph 3A Street, major storm drain, and water on Victoria Gardens Ln. Under construction
8 Ph 38(a) Foothill Blvd. east of Dav Creek Channel. Advertise
9 Ph 38lb Foothill Blvd. west of Dav Creek Channel. Advertise
10 Ph 38(c) Mall public sewer and water Complete
11 Ph 01/03 Final street caP, and cleanup work Under design
The above phases are a result of the formation of the two CFD's as well as the most cost
efficient construction of the improvements.
Funds for these improvements are from the two CFD's (a/c #'s 1 6123035650/1442612-0
& 1 614 303 5650/1442 614-0). District formation costs for construction are estimated at
$9,535,000, which includes a 10% contingency. Projections for soils and survey costs are
estimated to total $570,000. Proposals for those services are under review by staff and will
be brought before the City Council at a later date. Legal advertising is scheduled for
February 24 and March 2, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 30, 2004,
unless extended by Addenda.
R~'YW~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WCS
Attachments:
Vicinity Map and Resolution
.3/
RESOLUTION NO. 0 If - CJ;2. 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASES 1 B(B),
3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET,
STORM DRAIN, WATER FACILITIES, SEWER FACILITIES,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, LANDSCAPING AND
FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS ON FOOTHILL BLVD BETWEEN
ROCHESTER AVE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications.
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans
and specifications for "PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-
01 FOR STREET. STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said
advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices
of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
March 30; 2004, sealed bids or proposals for the "PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B)
OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD" capital improvement project in said
City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
.32
RESOLUTION NO.
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PHASES 1B(B),
3B(A), AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND
RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a
similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than
the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that
regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is
required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages.
Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City
Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the
job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as
penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each
laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if
such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of
wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or
by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor
under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship
committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the
apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will
also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of
the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to
the request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of
one to five, or
33
RESOLUTION NO.
February 18, 2004
Page 3
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than
one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the
administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or
journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the
public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of
Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other
requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the
Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of
Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in
the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall
comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with
working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of
the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of
the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before
mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is
required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to
execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are
defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor
Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or
bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at
least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the
proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into
such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the
property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
31
RESOLUTION NO.
February 18, 2004
Page 4
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid,
and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for
said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the
payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done
thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries
compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract
which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the
construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not
been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required
by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed
under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General
Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to
cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code,
Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the
expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that
the information being provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available
at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $65.00
(SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies
of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by
payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of
$25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
35
RESOLUTION NO.
February 18, 2004
Page 5
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set
forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's
sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld
(performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B) OF
CFD'S 2001-01 & 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD" may be directed to:
Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ex!. 4076.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 18th day of February, 2004
Publish Dates: February 24 and March 2, 2004
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this 18th day of February, 2004.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of
said City Council held on the 18th day of February, 2004
Executed this 18th day of February, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: February 24 and March 2, 2004
3t,
HIGHIANO AV9nJ~
VlCTORI4 PARK lAN~.
IlASf ili\fl"
~ RCl40
~ ~ ...
~ ~ ~
~
~ Ii: ~
Q i ~ >- ~
~ i!i
~ U It: .~
>- ~ , ~
NUr 10 SCo4IE Zi u ~
CHURCH
>-
Zi
PROJECT
SITE
BOULEVARD
.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
VICINITY MAP
___n.
PHASES 1B(B), 3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 &
2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BL YD. 1
THE CITY OF
F< ,~ ; ~., "{::, .1 ~ ,K;,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,,"-;;' '::":";',;<Ji~;<t -''''c-b:-,:> :._)j
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECr:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the city council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE GENERAL
CITY AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 200212003 AND APPROPRIATION OF
$61,666.00 TO ACCOUNT 1112303-5650/1026112-0
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $61,666.00 to account
1112303-5650/1026112-0 for General City Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements
for FY 2002/2003.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
General City Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net General
City Drainage funds received each fiscal year. Annually, at the end of each fiscal year, after the
City's financial books are closed, twenty-five percent (25%) of all General City Drainage fees
collected during the fiscal year are set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement fund." The
developers who are required by the City to construct planned drainage facilities necessary for
proper drainage of their subdivisions enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City. The
planned drainage reimbursement fund is divided between all these developers with the numerator
being the original reimbursement sum for the developer and the denominator is the total of the
original reimbursement sums for all developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage
reimbursement fund for said fiscal year.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi~'e~~
City Engineer
WJO:DJ:dlw
3<t
r H E
~'~{~. C " 6
C I r y 0 F
,~'" t~ ;."'""h'>'ii..h,,,
Cue AM 0 N G A
.,.." '.:,......;;:,,)111,.
,'" <lHC/'~':,' ;:t',.> ,i>,'i;;,c:..i:&i'gPi"':>:"~:;<..;;li1
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SU8.JECf:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL TO SUMMARILY VACATE THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF PARCEL
"A" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, AN OFFER OF DEDICATION OR FUTURE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO PARCEL 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND
WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE; V-I92 - APN: 201-182-34.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily ordering the vacation of
the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, an offer of dedication for future public
access to Parcel 2, authorizing the City Clerk to present a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits to
be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On July 30, 1992, Parcel Map 13692 recorded with an Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A". Parcel "A" was
offered as dedication for said map's master plan, providing for future public access to Parcel 2. The
proposed development of Tract Map 16237 has reconfigured the master plan street configuration,.
thereby, making Parcel "A" unnecessary and unusable.
On February 13, 2003, Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16237 per Resolution No.
02-26 with the condition to vacate the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A". Replacement access to Parcel 2
will be provided through Lot 5 of Tentative Tract Map 16237.
On January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission determined the vacation conforms to the General Plan
and recommended that the vacation occur.
Rz;1~"{~
Willtafu"J. O'Neil .
City Engineer
WJO:RG:dlw
Attachments
~
3q
.~
~
;::!
t"
".
----
,~
W
iiM;i
'~?i
-- ---:-------
"'-r.t----
.1.
..t
1'"
ARt?A TO BE
VACATED
(V-I'1i:)
6
,
,
,
r
"
"
,
,
,
.;
-,,,..,,-,
,/ 5
I
I
,
,
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DMSION
-
-+:
.3
. /1
4
rrEM.:Y/CINITY MAP
TITLE:SUl3VAC /lfZ (V-l'11-)
<b?:>
40
RESOLUTION NO. t:>'I- 62 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE IRREVOCABLE
OFFER OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, AN
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR FUTURE PUBLIC ACCESS TO
PARCEL 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND
WEST OF HA VEN A VENUE; V-192 - APN: 201-182-34
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8333, of the Streets and Highway Code, the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the
Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, an offer of dedication for future public
access to Parcel 2, located south of Wilson A venue and west of Haven A venue; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on January 14, 2004
by minute action found and determined that the summary vacation of the subject Offer of
Dedication herein contemplated conforms to the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the Irrevocable Offer
of Parcel "A" is unnecessary for present or prospective street purposes because it has not been
used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years
immediately preceding the proposed vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucaffionga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaffionga hereby makes its
order vacating the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, an offer of
dedication for future public access to Parcel 2, located south of Wilson A venue and west of
Haven Avenue, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B".
SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said Irrevocable
Offer of Parcel" A" no longer constitutes a public use easement.
SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservation and exceptions,
if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
4/
The land described herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:
Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, as per Map recorded in Book 167, Pages 94 and 95 of
Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described
as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Parcel "A" as shown on said Parcel Map No. 13692;
thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Parcel Map No. 13692, South 000 51' 13"
West, 31.67 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave Northeasterly having a
radius of 50.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears South 040 43' 19" East; thence
Westerly and Northwesterly along said curve, 64.19 feet through a central angle of 730 33' 15"
to a point on the Northerly line of said Parcel Map No. 13692, a radial line through said point
bears South 680 49' 56" West; thence Easterly along said Northerly line, South 890 52' 40"
East, 51.21 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Contains 1216.75 Sq. Ft. or 0.028 acres, more or less.
As shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
~ ~ ~~9!1/0~
BRIAN K. MIC ELSON, L.S. # 7320
MY LICENSE EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2005
~
,-/2
NW
~ P
.....J ~
SHEET 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT B (SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
PARCEL "A", PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, P.M.B. 167/94-95
(V~ I':J:Z) I
I
I
I
I~
1m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-r 1
r- ,)
J.. .0..
;\1;
R" 7
!;!!-;
1 / -4;
J\j E
N 89052'40' W
---------
J\A
PORTiON
NP
1 / -4
;
1 / -4
;
r T i 0 JV :;J c'
'-' ~ D P.O.B.
<fi~ - LEGAL
~G~:~"!~O)/ DESCRIPTION
r/- \~ 330.08'
51.21'
j\.;} .J-\
JV 0"
j .r) r:'
o 0
j 8 7
peL
PARCEL
'~ "
~~o
'00
'("'64.19
P .J-\ F( eEL
r j\ /1 ,)
J YJ."D..
p
(V-l'fz'
D2
/
D 1
:;J
~
B~<:~~:/r~?
MY LICENSE EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2005
,
:z
,0
- ,~
r-.._,o
"! ::o,~
-- 'J>IW
M o:~
~,,,,
, :
,=E
,
,,"'-')
~
(0
/\
o
'v
/\
(, r?) /\
'?' ()'
~\ (' y \
/\ 0 (0
'\ .I
0' /()
~ \
(~e)
(],y
(0'
~~'
~)
/\
o
'v
..
SCALE
1" = 20'
l/3
,
,
I
THE CITY Of
I
RANCUO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST
DESIGNATION DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to designate the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery as a Historic Point of
Interest, located at 8812 Haven Avenue - APN: 0209-131-02.
RECOMMENDATION
The Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommends designation of the
Cucamonga Pioneer Winery property as a Historical Point of Interest by adop1ion of the
attached Resolution.
BACKGROUND
The original buildings at the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery were built by the California Wine
Association Winery in 1905. The winery was later owned by Garrett and Company Winery, who
also owned the Virginia Dare Winery. A co-operative consisting of several prominent
Cucamonga families purchased the winery and continued its operation until 1972. The co-
operative was the first to own and operate its own winery in the Cucamonga area.
The winery buildings are no longer viable for rehabilitation. However, the prominence of the
winery in the Cucamonga area rnerits Historic Point of Interest Designation.
ANALYSIS
The attached Historic Preservation Commission staff report provides a detailed analysis of the
historical and cultural significance of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery property (Exhibit "A").
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study while staff completed Part II. The effects of
the project on Cultural Resources have been mitigated to a less than significant level through
mitigations imposed on the project. The mitigations include a requirement for 1he owner to
place a plaque which describes the Point of Interest. The property owner is required to donate
funds for oral histories of two individuals connected with the winery, and any new development
4'1
CITY COUNCIL
DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
February 18. 2004
Page 2
will include interpretive art. The owners are also required to complete a Historical Architectural
Building Survey (HABS), Level III documentation of all buildings on the property to be archived
with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:LS:ls
Attachments: ExhiM "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated January 28, 2004
Draft City Council Resolution of Approval for DRC2003-01048
'f!J
II ~ [l
THE
Vi L"/1i ",:<'it>;
C I T Y
o F
,,\"2><~'
"",'),.""'-"0".'"
"""'"f;;~..."",.;. /+:
>i-;ij:);>.j:;',,;
;.ie.;"",;';.";
'"''';Phi'''':::;''''''' :':1
RANCUO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: January 28, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preserva1ion Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST
DESIGNATION DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven Avenue as an
Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and
structures on property - APN: 0209-131-02.
BACKGROUND:
A. Historical Sianificance: The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery began as the California Wine
Association (CWA) Winery in 1905. The CWA administered wineries across the state, and
the Cucamonga winery was used for the processing of grapes from local growers in 1905.
In 1916, the CWA sold the winery to Garrett and Company, who later owned the Mission
Winery. Garrett and Company used the Pioneer Winery for storage of their concentrates
and tonics made at the Virginia Dare Winery.
In 1934, several prominent farnilies in the Cucamonga region formed the Cucamonga
Pioneer Vineyard Association, including the HOfers, Thomases, DeBerards, Millikens, and
Belchers. The association purchased the CWA winery frorn Garrett and Company and
becarne the first co-operative in Cucarnonga to own and operate its own winery. The
association began to decline in sales by the late 1950's, and began to sell its wine through
the Brookside Winery. In 1960, the association leased the winery to Brookside Winery,
because of the death of Cucamonga Winery's wine maker. By 1972, the cooperative
dissolved, and Brookside ceased leasing the winery in 1975.
B.
Site Characteristics: The winery building sits on a 9.65 acre parcel, containing seven
con1ributing buildings: a scale house, boiler building, distillery, ferrnentation building,
storage, cellar building, and crusher. The site also includes several outbuildings that do
n01 contribute to the Historic Point of Interest. The land use designation of 1he site is
Industrial Park and Low Residential.
.2/t (/1 D '/'
L/b
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The CWA built the first structures on the property, including the scale house,
distillery, fermentation building, and a s10rage building, all of wood frame construction. A
railroad spur of the Atkinson, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad was also constructed by the
CW A. Exhibit "C" contains the Primary Records for these contributing buildings on the
property. The remaining buildings were built after the mid 1930's, when the cooperative
took over the winery.
B. Point of Interest Desionation: The subject site and structure do not qualify for landmark
designation based upon the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance. The buildings have
become too deteriorated to retain their historical integrity without substantial
reconstruction. However, the site does qualify for Historic Point of Interest Designation
due to the significance of the winery during the time it was owned by the cooperative.
C. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was prepared for the project. Mitigation is
included in the attached Resolution to address the historical nature of the winery site.
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Findino 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an historical
. period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Factls:
The winery represents the agricultural period of the Cucamonga region, and
relates to the livelihood of many residents.
Findino 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
Factls:
The winery was owned at one time by Garrett and Company, one of
Cucamonga's prominent wineries. The cooperative involved several significant
families within 1he Cucamonga region, including the Thomases, DeBerards,
Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers.
Findino 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was
once common but is now rare.
Factls:
Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not
necessary, as demand for swee1 wines declined and the region began to be
subdivided by developers.
Factls:
The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own
winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment.
L(7
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 28, 2004
Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Point of Interest designation was advertised as a public
hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices
were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission
recommend approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048, subject to
conditions contained in the attached Resolution, to be forwarded to the City Council for final
. action.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:LS\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Photographs of Winery Buildings
Exhibit "C" Primary Record for Winery District
Exhibit "D" Initial Study Parts I and II
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Point of Interest
Designation DRC2003-01048
L.f'g
SITE LOCATION MAP
:c D~C
C'l ~
m
z z
iiI ~
::u
~ JERSEY AV
25TH ST
I .. H
~
z
m
~ .~~
ISI
DID a 8~~ .
_TAV
~
D Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District
~ Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Buildings
Railroad Line
Historic Point of Interest Designation
DRC2003-01048
\~\ Rancho Cucamonga (fJi./9
Planning Division
December 2003
:,-",_ .. ,,,,",.,,,..-;~.....,,\;_~),:,C~,~:'-"';"';_4~;"""';';;_,
CSt-\ l'\ '. f\o ( +h~ '\ <1e...- .
1\
\' b fEe lY'\e.vr-\-er- '. LD~+ S \ de....
..56
'0"
'-
~i'f\e(\-\e..\ '. t00{~ S"d..Q....,
130 \ l-e ("
~:' j~Y"..,~<~:d~:,.D1" So\.l+hS; d.~..........
.5'1
.~--~:-;-: -.--
-=te.fffie0-1-e(": 6Q.~+ S;d.e......
f-=e.;,' ffie'f\~ \"
---
..l.J\. +e..r- \ oy'
P1. Other Identifier: Cucamonaa Pioneer Winerv District
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
*a. County San Bernardino and (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (19811 T lS; R 7W; ~14 of SE 14 of See -11.; 12088.M.
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonaa Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give mo,e than one for lerge and/or Unear resources) Zone 11 : mE!
.e. Other Localional Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN 0209-131-02
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and Its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations. size, settinQ, and boundaries)
The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District is located on a parcel measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet on the
northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Humboldt Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The surrounding area consists of a
residential nei9hborhood to the west, Haven Avenue and an agricultural field to the east, light industrial properties to the
north, and Humboldt Avenue and the MetrolinklSouthem Calnomia Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (formerty
Atchinson, Topeka and Santa Fe [AT&SF]) railroad tracks to the south. .
The district includes both archaeological and historic architectural resources. There are nine main architectural
components within the district, seven of which are contributing elements to the historic district. There are also several
outbuildings and ancillary structures on the property. The buildings and structures are concentrated in the north haff of
the parcel, a majority of which are located in the northeast comer. The landscape of the winery parcel consists mosUy of
graded dirt, anhough a portion of the yard has been paved with asphan. Four historic artifact scatters and two isolated
artifacts were documented within the District. The artifact scatters have not been formally evaluated for significance,
but Loci 1, 2, and 4 should be considered potentially contributin9 elements of the District.
See continuation sheet.
.P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
Privies/dumosltrash scatters. lAH16l Other
.P4. Resources Present: [&] Building [&] Structure
mN
lHPBllndustrial Buildina. lHP41 Ancillarv buildina. lAH41
SEE SKETCH MAP
[&] Object [&] Site [&] District [&] Element of District [&] Other
P5b. Description of Photo:
(VIew, date, accession #1
Not aDDUcable/see sketch mao
.P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1905. 1936. and 1950
(Hofer 1983: Sanbom maDS 1913
and 19291
*P7. OWner and Addresa:
Paul Hofer
11274S. Tumer
Ontario. Calilomia 91761
.P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affillallon, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. Christine
Hackina & Alex Wesson
URS Comoralion
2020 East Rrsl Street. Ste. 400
Santa Ana. CA 92705
*P9. Date Recorded:
21 ADril 2003
*Pl0. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survey
P5a. Photo or Drawing
~
\ ~
Pll. Report Cltatlon*: (Ctte survey report and other sources, or enter 'none) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade SeDaration Initial Studv ADDendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort. URS Comoralion. Santa Ana.
.Attachments: 0 NONE [&] Location Map [&] Sketch Map [&] Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
[&] Archaeological Record [&] District Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artilact Record 0 Photograph Record [&] Nine Primary Record Forms for District Architectural Components
DPR 523J (1/95) Plonee,_w1nery.doc
.RequlrecllnfOrmatio6" 0
Page ~ of..M-
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson. Christine Hackina. Alex Wesson
'Resource Identifier:
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
Description (continued)
The buildings and structures on the winery parcel are associated with grape processing and wine making. FIve of the
contributing elements are buildings associated with wine making. The scale house is located near the main gate to the winery
and a scale located to the south of the scale house weighed truck loads of grapes as the 9rowers brou9ht them to the winery.
The scale house likely served as an administrative area, as well as the place were truck wei9hts were recorded. Three of the
buildings were used to process the grapes-the Boiler Building, the Distillery, and the Fermentation Building. The last
contributing buildin9 is the Storage/Cellar Building. Two of the contributing elements are structures-the grape crusher and the
railroad spur.
Non-contributing elements include a poured concrete water tank and a residential building, which likely was buin in the 19408
or 1950s and does not possess sufficient significance or integrity. There are other ancillary buildings on the property, including
concrete sheds, a concrete tank, concrete structures that may have housed pumps or other machinery, three cooling towers,
and a redwood shed.
Archaeoloaical Loci 1. 2. and 4
These three archaeological components to the District have not been evaluated at the time of publication for this form, but
should be considered potentially contributing elements to the District.
Locus 1: This historic artifact scatter is located on the north side of a concrete tank at the northem periphery of the
winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments, as well as
fragments of brown, green, olive, and clear container glass. Other artifacts included unidentifiable metal
objects, nails, bottle tops, staples, bolts, screws, and pull-tops from beer cans.
Locus 2: This historic artifact scatter is located around a circular concrete water tank in the northwest comer of the
winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments, as well as
fragments of cobalt, brown, green, olive, pink, clear, and .milk" within the scatter 9lass. Other artifacts
included brick fra9ments, unidentifiable metal fragments, coils, barbed wire, modem beer bottles, bottle
caps, roof sheeting, an old five-rung ladder, and pull-tops from beer cans.
Locus 4: This historic artifact scatter that extends along the entire westem perimeter of the winery parcel. The scatter
also extends along the westem haft of the southem perimeter of the parcel. Artifacts within this scatter are
similar to those found in Loci 1 and 2, however amethyst glass was noted in the artifact deposits along the
boundaries of the property line. Most of the artifacts were observed between the perimeter fence and the
paved surface of Marine Avenue and Humbolt Avenue. These artifacts may be associated with the
Boarding House (no longer extant) shown on the 1913 Sanbom FIre Insurance Company map in the west
central portion of the winery parcel (Figure 5).
Archaeoloaical Locus 3 and Isolate A and B
These three archaeological components to the District do not appear eligible individually or as contributors to the District.
Locus 3: This sparse historic artifact scatter is located in the southeastem quadrant of the winery parcel, in a plowed
field south of the boiler building. Artifacts within the scatter consisted mainly of brick fragments and a few
unidentifiable metal fragments.
Isolate A consists of a fragment of amethyst container glass.
Isolate B consists of a ceramic sailor doll's head.
DPR 523.1 (1/95) Plonoe,_w1nery.doc
*Requlred Informellon
~7
i'.~~~4~~:~~u~~~~~~~~:..s> ..
rJi,QS~!J~tiii'i!~:;";~,.; .});t);~'g1;~"'*?;!:~;':".'
Page -L of M
'Map Name:
t~'~2~~~i;t:~":";~~jk?~~J,
;' ;~;t~;~~lq~:!:;;~3:-I;:~~:?j-f;~~'}:i
Guasti
.Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) CucamonQa Pioneer Winerv District
.Scale: 1:24.000 .Dateofmap: 1966 (1981\
- :._;.~.:.'~_~.'.~.-.',.'.' .~_,_'..~.'._'-.'.'.7.:.~.;_'~..~.::_'.'.~.=.~..",~.".-...r.~.C.L.:~..:~.''-....~.~..~.f.~~..'~.'._~.,.-~.-._ -.:;.'~.'-_-.-.~.~_..:t_.~.',~.~ ,....-_.~.~:_~.L.;".;~..~._.;~..~.}ft:.~' "~:
;v _ .. .~~n__~= . _. ~5 ,...._;~~~
~;;.~~:;:~~-,;-:~
.-.--
._---.-
."
~~~:i~,~~:~:~~:,~~~~'t.:-;.-~:o<~:=.',~, ~;:"
=::--'~'m '~='. ..':-" 11::;. . .____ .~-Y
'::;~~-.~:~-~~~;~:-~':.~~.-.::. ~~~~~ I';:;;~':: ~-~:~~:~~~
=_ ~.A.."'~~=_~~
_~~=~~~=~~~:.__ em
.. .-, --..- -
'--'--' -.---
..-
....... -'-._- -'""'--"",-
-.-.--,-.----...-
~~%:i~~
~~..~':"::-.;::;:::::.;;;:;,.;,,~
'::-:-'-:;::~:-: ".:
::;:;;.;:_~..:-.::"":-
--=-...-.~..;~.<: -~
~.-...:~::',
. .' .
."~~:~~::;~~~.~~~;~
- .....
.;~;~:\.;;;,:i~~;~-~7:~~~
~:
Cucamonga Pioneer
Winery District
.
..
.-
."..
~;f~:~~~j:.~;~f;~~~~~[&;'~~~
: "0.;;.;yJ!. .,.. =
..~. ..-- '_.'-'~-'
...-.....-..-:;;
__~..:":.:i;;:;'Z_.
j>
....,,1
101,.'.
"
. ~
.~
. ''23
~, IL;:,:,_=--_..
A
N
0 2000 Feet
,
0 609.6 Meters
,
'_~. ..-,:;;,::1;'::2-;,: .___;~;
" .~
"-~:' ~-::- ;::~;~ i ~'~,. _ ~ ~.:.:;=.o:.;;:,~~~~~,:",_
DPR 523J (1/95)
'Required information
Ss
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
I
Page -L of .M- .Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) CucamonQa Pioneer Winerv District
C. Hackino. A. Wesson and K. Erickson .Date of map: Aoril 23 2003 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
N
o
I
164 Feet I
,
50 Meters I
,
I
o
1 :1,968
DPR 523J (1/95)
"Required sftion I
'NRHP Status Code 3S
'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder): L-
01. Historic Name: Cucamonoa Pioneer Winery
02. Common Name: same
*D3. Detailed Description (Discuss overall coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. Ust all
elements of district)
(See description on the Primary Record form for more Information)
The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District is a suite of archaeological and historic architectural resources associated with
a local winery organized by local grape growers in 1934. The buildings are located in the north ha~ of the parcel, with a
majority of the bum environment located in the northeast comer. Although the parcel is surrounded by residential and
light industrial development, it maintains the feeling of a rural winery.
See continuation sheet.
'04. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.)
The district boundary was defined as the boundaries of the San Bernardino County Assesso~s parcel upon which the
winery is located (APN 0209-131-02). The parcells approximately 700- by SOD-feet and bounded by the property line
to the north, Humboldt Avenue to the south, Haven Avenue to the east, and Marine Avenue to. the west (see sketch
map).
'05. Boundery Justification
The boundaries were determined by utilizing the existing winery property lines. All of the District's signilicant elements
are located w~hin this boundary and the selling of the parcel retains integrny due to the relationship of the extant
buildings and the agricullural feeling of the parcel. The winery has been located on this parcel since approximataly
1905.
'06. Significance: Theme Wineries and cooDerative wineries: 190D-1950
Area Rancho Cucamonoa and southern Call1omia
Period of Significance 1935-1950 Applicable Criteria A. B. & C
(Discuss district's importance In tenns of its historical context as defined by theme. period 01 signiflcence. and geographic scope. Also
address the Integrity 01 the district es a whole.)
Note: Three of the historic artifact scatters within the District (Loci 1, 2, and 4) should be considered potentially
contributing elements to the District. They have not been formally evaluated for CRHR eligibil~, but they may contain
intact primary archaeological deposits from the period of significance, which would make them contributing elements to
the District, and would'make the District eligible under Cmerion D.
Hiatorlc Context
The historic period of settlement in southern Califomia began with Spanish exploration in the late eighteenth century.
The Spanish government subsequenUy established missions and military outposts to facilitate colonization of the area.
After Mexico won independence from Spain in 1821, colonization efforts in Alia Calilomla decreased. The Spanish
mission system was largely abandoned and the Mexican government bestowed land grants or ranchos to those loyal to
the Mexican government and to some Anglo settlers. The region that would eventually become Rancho Cucamonga
was part of a 13,OOD-acre land grant received by Tubercio Tapia in 1839. Tapia, a soldier, smuggler, and pol~ician,
established a ranch and winery on his property (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003).
'07.
After Tapia's death, the property was passed to his daughter Maria, who married Leon Vlelor Prudhomme in 1847. The
winery continued to operate under the direction of Jose Maria Valdez, Tapia's foreman and caretaker until 1858. JlJ. that
time, John Rains purchased the Cucamonga rancho. Rains, a former Texas Ranger, had ambitions to own land and join
Ihe upper classes of Califomia society. In 185S, he married into a prominent and wealthy family Ihrough his marriage 10
Maria Merced Williams. In response 10 Ihe increased demand for wine and grapes, Rains expanded the winery. Due to
its location along the highway between San Bernardino and Los Angeles, the ranch became a popular slop, and the
area began to be known as a prime location lor grape and wine production.
See continuation sheet
References
CUy of Rancho Cucemonga, Rancho Cucemonga: A Tradition of VISion, (CUy 01 Rancho Cucemonga, 2002); CUy 01 Rancho
Cucemonga. The History of Rancho Cucamonga, (http://www.cl.rancho-cucemonga.ca.us/plannlnglheri1age.htm. 2003); CUy 01
Rancho Cucemonga, Designated and Potential Historical Site Ust, (City 01 Rancho Cucemonga. Revised April 1994); Clucas, Don L,
Ught Over the Mountain: A History of the Cucsmongs Ares, (Kengraphics Printing and Uthography Co.;'Ontario. 1974); Oaily Report,
'Ploneer Winery Grows Steadily. . (Dailv Recor!, on file atlhe City 01 Rancho CUcemonga Planning Department, Pioneer Winery file,
1941); Hofer. James D., A History 01 the Cucemongs Pioneer Vineyard Association, (Masters Thesis, Claremont Graduate UniversUy.
Claremont Callfomia, 1983); Winter, Kirsten, DPR 523 Form: 2101 N. Glenosks Boulevarfi, Burbank. California, (URS Corporation,
Phoenix, 2002).
"08.
Evaluator: Kirslen Erickson
Affiliation and Address: URS COrDoration. 7720 N. 1S" Street. SIe 100. Phoenix. AZ 85020
Date of Evaluation: 4 June 2003
DPR 523J (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
'Requlred InlOrrnatlon0()
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRlfTrinomial
I
Page -2-- of ~ 'Resource Identifier:
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson. Christine Hackino. and Alex Wesson 'Date 21 April 2003
X Continuation 0 Update
I
Detailed Description (continued)
I
There are nine major architectural elements of the dislricl, seven of which are contributing properties and two of which are
non-conlributors, In addilion to the nine major elements. there are also several non-conlribuling oulbuildings and ancillary
structures within the district. Primary record forms for each 01 the nine major architectural elements were completed and are
attached 10 this form, In addition 10 the, architectural componenls of the dislrict, there are six archaeological elements within
Ihe District. Three are considered potentially contributing properties. while the other three are clearly non-contributors,
Primary records have not been prepared for each of Ihe archaeological elements. Rather. these are described on a single
archaeological site record form.
I
Conlributing Properties:
A. Scale House
B. Boiler Building
C. Distillery
D, Fermentation Building
E. Storage/Cellar Building
F, Crusher
I. Santa Fe Railroad Spur
Potentially Contributing Properties:
Locus 1
Locus 2
Locus 4
I
I
I
Non-Contribution Properties:
G. Water Tank
H. House
Locus 3
Isolales A and B
I
Oulbuildinas and Ancillarv Structures
I
There are several outbuildings and ancillary structures located on the winery parcel. There are five, small concrete block
sheds spread out across the parcel. The sheds are square or rectangular in shape with wood frame. hipped roofs clad with
composition material with exposed rafter ends. Some of the sheds have wood doors with metal hinges, but some of the doors
have been removed. Al leasl two of the sheds contain electrical switches, which may have controlled pumps or other
equipment.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Concrele Slock Shed Localed in Ihe Southeast Quadrant of the Parcel (view east)
I
DPR 523J (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
*Required Information
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRllTrinomial
Page.l of ~
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
'Resource Identifier:
'Dale 21 ADril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
Detailed Description (continued)
There is aiso a square, concrete tank and two concrete boxes located near the northwest corner of the Fermentation Building,
The tank is constructed of poured concrete and contains to storage reservoirs, There are pipes that extend to/from the
Fermentation Building,
Concrete Tank Located Near the Northwest Comer of the Fermentation Building (view northwest)
There are three cooling towers located on the parcel--one is located to the west of the house and is constructed of metal,
suggesting that it is newer, The other two cooling towers are located to the west of the Fermentation Builping and near the
southwest comer of Ihe distillery. The cooling towers are wood frame structures with concrete bases. The towers consist of
stacked wood or metal trays.
Wood Frame Cooling Tray Near the Southwesl Corner of Ihe Distillery (view north)
DPR 523J (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
*Requlred Infonnation~ /
I
Slate of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Page -1L of ~
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
Primary #
HRI/Trlnomlal
i
'Resource Identifier: 1
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
I
Detailed Description (continued)
I
There is a wood framed shed located west of the house, It has no foundation and is currently mounted on horizontal logs, The
exterior wall surface is board and batten redwood siding and it has a shed roof. There are two entries on the front of the
shed-one entry has a wood door with metal hinges and the other door has been removed, Based upon Its construction
materials. this shed may be have been constructed about the same time as the Fermentation Building and Ihe Dislillery.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wood Framed Shed (view south)
I
None of the outbuildings appear to contribute to the significance of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District and are not major
elements of the district.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DPR 523J (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
.Requlred Informatio~ 2 I
~~~t~t'~'i~i~6if:~-?:;"~'~;:'~{
~,.ilEi?All, ,~
C' :" 'W.#("'''ti,'
: CON ,
t:~-L'.#:;.i;;~z.,u
page.JL of.M...-
Recorded by: Kirslen Erickson
'Resource Identifier: 1
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
Historic Conlexl (continued)
In 1862, Rains was murdered on his way to Los Angeles, and as he had heavily mortgaged Cucamonga 10 finance other land
purchases. his widow was forced to sell Cucamonga in 1870 10 Isaias Hellman. Hellman subdivided Ihe property, which was
purchased by new settlers and land developers. Hellman sold the winery property, but later purchased II back in 1895, and
formed Ihe Cucamonga Vineyard Company (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Hofer 1983).
A short-lived land speculalion boom occurred in soulhem California in Ihe 18805, which mainly was a result 01 railroad
construction. After being connected by rail 10 the rest of the country, immigration to southern Califomia became easier and rale
wars between Southem Pacific Railroad and Sanla Fe Railroad resulted in low fares. Immigrants 10 southern Califomia were
attracted by Ihe favorable climate and agricultural potential. The Sanla Fe Railroad track from Los Angeles 10 San Bernardino
was compleled in 1887, which promoled settlement and land purchases in Cucamonga. Hellman crealed the Cucamonga Fru~
Lands Company and the area quickly became settled in Ihe 16905. A tunnel dug into Ihe Cucamonga Canyon provided waler
to the settlers. Available irrigalion waler, along wilh the favorable soil and climate, allowed the selllers to grow cllrus fruits,
olives, figs, nuts, and grapes. The Cucamonga area was already known for its wine, and new immigrants to the area planled
new vineyards and helped define Cucamonga as an important wine making region (C~ of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Clucas
1974; Clucas 1974; Hofer 1983; Winter 2002).
Cucamonga, along wilh its neighboring communities, Alia Loma and Etiwanda, progressed during the firsl half of the twentieth
cenlury. but largely remained agricultural commun~ies. Churches. schools, businesses, and infrastructure were built in the firsl
part of the century and access 10 Los Angeles was provided via the Pacific Electric Railway from AlIa Loma in 1913 (City of
Rancho Cucamonga 2003).
The wine industry experienced sel backs during World War I and Ihe 19205 and early 19305. The Lever Food and Fuel Act
prohib~ed the use of food for the making of liquor during Ihe war. and the Volstead Act or Prohibition, which was in effect from
1919to 1933. had an adverse effect upon Ihe wine and grape industry. Several of Ihe large Cucamonga wineries closed or
were sold during Prohibition, while others pr~duced grape products such as concentrates and tonics. Many grape growers
shipped their grapes and grape products to eastern cities. After the repeal of Prohib~ion, the demand for Cucamonga sweet
wines increased as wine consumption increased (Hofer 1983).
Wine sales conlinued 10 be good during World War II and wine inventories increased. However, after Ihe war, wine supply
dramatically surpassed demand due to lower agricultural prices and the post-war economy. After 1950, industrial and urban
development increased, and more and more vineyard properties began to be sold. As agricultural property was Iransformed
into induslrial properly and the Ontario airport expanded, wine making and agricultural enterprises in the Cucamonga area
decreased. In the 19705, the Cucamonga area experienced extreme growth as people working in Los Angeles and Orange
Counties sought more affordable housing in suburban areas. In 1975, the commun~ies of Cucamonga, Etiwanda, and AlIa
Loma were incorporated as the C~ of Rancho Cucamonga and became the third largest c~ in San Bernardino County (C~
of Rancho Cucamonga 2002).
Wineries in Cucamonga
The winery al the CUC8monga rancho had proved Cucamonga to be a superior environmenl for growing grapes and had
established Cucamonga's reputation as an importanl wine making region. Soon after Hellman began to subdivide the rancho
properly, new wineries were established in Cucamonga. In 1886, George Haven and Daniel Milliken founded Ihe Haven
Vineyard Company, localed on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 8"' Street, directly across the
streel from Ihe land that would become Ihe Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. Haven and Milliken's efforts were importanl, as they
were Ihe first in Ihe area 10 implemenl dry farming for grape growing, which would prove 10 produce sweeler wines, for which
the Cucamonga area became known (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Hofer 1983).
Secondo Guasti eslablished Ihe Italian Vineyard Company in 1900. The more than 5,OOO-acre vineyard and winery were
localed south of Cucamonga. Guasti was successful in marketing his grapes and wine commercially, encouraging olher grape
growers and wine producers to do the same. The Mission Winery was founded in 1910 by Posl and Klausman near the
inlersection of Foolhill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, and in 1911, Ihe Cucamonga Vintage Company was eslablished. The
Cucamonga Vintage Company was the first cooperative association of grape growers in Cucamonga, but they did not own
Iheir own winery, bul rather leased property near 8"' Slreet and Turner Streel, in Ihe vicinity of the Santa Fe Railroad Iracks
(Hofer 1983).
DPR 523.1 (1/95) Plon__w1nery.doc
'Requlred Inlorrnauoi3
Page..19- of.M--
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
'Resource Identifier:
'Date 21 Aoril 2003
1
X Continuation
o Update
Wineries in Cucamonga (continued)
The winemaking induslry Ihrived in Cucamonga during Ihe early years of the twentielh century. World War I, followed by
Prohibition and Ihe Depression, caused Ihe wine industry in Cucamonga 10 falter. The only large Cucamonga winery Ihal was
nol closed or sold during Ihis era was Ihe Italian Vineyard Company, which survived by developing new grape products.
Hellman leased the Cucamonga Vineyard Company 10 Ihe Calilomia Wine Association (CWA) in 1910, and laler sold II to the
Cucamonga Investmenl Company in 1917. Garrett and Company of New York purchased the Mission Winery in 1918, which
became the Virginia Dare Winery. Garrett and Company produced grape concentrate and wine tonics during Ihe war and
Prohibition. By 1928, the Cucamonga Vinlage Company cooperative associalion folded and the winery was laken over by
Weslem Grape Products (Hofer 1983).
Desp~e Ihe war and Prohibition," Cucamonga grape growers and wineries continued 10 operale. s~ipping Iheir products 10
eastern c~ies. Alternate grape products included raisins, tonics, vinegar, and jams. Grapes were also shipped east to be used
for homemade wine making, and wine w~h Ihe legal alcohol content could also be produced. The demand lor the Cucamonga
sweet wines actually increased during the first half of the 19205, causing Ihe grape growers to plant more. However, by the
late 19205, the economic recession was beginning, causing the demand and prices of grapes to decline (Hofer 1983).
Cucamonga Pioneer Winery
The winery that would become the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was originally established as the California Wine Association
(CWA) Winery in 1905. The CWA was a large company that adminislered wineries across Ihe stale, and buill the Cucamonga
winery to process Ihe grapes of the local growers in 1905. The CW A conslructed wood frame buildings on the winery,
including the scale house, dislillery, fermenlation building, and a storage building, and a railroad spur of the Atkinson, Topeka,
and Santa Fe Railroad. In 1916, CWA sold the winery to Garrett and Company of New York, who later purchased the Mission
Winery in 1918. Garrett and Company used Ihe winery for slorage of their concentrates and tonics made at the Virginia Dare
Winery and as a location to prepare their products for shipping (Hofer 1983).
The declining grape prices during the lale 19205 and earty 19305 encouraged a group of Cucamonga grape growers 10 form a
cooperative organization. In 1934, three past members of the Cucamonga Vintage Company. Hugh Thomas, Harry DeBerard,
and Benlon Ballou, along wilh George L. Belcher and Paul B. Hofer, established the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard
Association (Association). The Association purchased the old CWA winery from Garrett and Company, and became the lira!
cooperalive organization in Cucamonga to own and operate its own winery. The originallen members of the Association were
prominenl and well.respected Cucamonga residents and grape growers, who hoped to become less dependent on commercial
wineries. As the grape and wine markel improved in the mid 19305, the Association's cooperative would allow members to
control prices, and as a cooperative, the Associalion were nol required 10 pay federal income lax (Hofer 1983).
Because Garrett and Company had utilized the winery exclusively for storage for almost 20 years, new machinery and
improvements were necessary. The Association installed a new crusher, stemmer, and must pump and purchased pumps,
hoses, and olher equipment necessary to transportlhe wine from the fermenlation building 10 Ihe distillery or the slorage
building. Other improvements and purchases included new redwood fermenting and slorage tanks, refrigeration equipmen~
and lruck scales. The wine produced al the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was sold in bulk and shipped to markets by railroad
lank cars, which was facilitaled by the Santa Fe Railroad spur Ihal was located on Ihe winery property. Smaller amounts of
barreled wine were sold locally, but Ihe Association did not bottle any of their wine under its own label until 1940. The
Association produced sweet and dry wines, sherry, and brandy (Hofer 1983; Daily Report 1941).
By 1941, the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery had a storage capacity of more Ihan 1,650,000 gallons and employed more Ihan 45
employees. A 1941 newspaper article claimed Ihal the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was .one of the famous co-operative
wineries of Ihe Cucamonga dislrict" and was "the first such co-operative in this terrilory" (Dally Report 1941). The Association
and Ihe wine industry benefiled from Ihe repeal of prohibition, when wine consumption dramatically increased. However, by
the lale 19305, the demand for sweel wine gradually decreased, leaving the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery with a surplus
inventory of wine. When Ihe Association was unable 10 sell their 1937 wine locally, they Association affilialed Ihemselves with
a nationwide markeling agenl called Califomia Wine Sales, Inc. 10 help Ihem dispose of their wine to make room for the next
years product. The Association continued their affilialion wilh California Wine Sales and were met with success until after
World War II. Between 1939 and 1947, the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery began bottling some of its own wine, but a majorny of
Iheir wine sales remained bulk sales (Daily Report 1941 ; Hofer 1983).
DPR 523.1 (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
'Requlred InfOnnallO~ tf
Page.1L. of ~
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
'Resource Idenliller: 1
'Dale 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Updale
Cucamonga Pioneer Winery (continued)
World War II was a prosperous time for Ihe Call1omia wine induslry. Prices increased due to a Iim~ed quantity of wina resulting
in part from a governmental restriclion. In order to meet govemmenlal marketing orders for raisins, the amounl of grapes Ihat
would be crushed for wine was reslricled. Relums to Ihe Association's members were at an all time high during Ihe war. After
the war ended, wine inventories were again at surplus due to Ihe revocation of wartime restrictions, low prices, and the posl-
war economy. Faced wilh a large inventory, Ihe Associalion joined Ihe Wine Growers Guild, which had formerly been
Califomia Wine Sales. The Wine Growers Guild combined all of its members wine and processed all of the wine orders out of
Iheir headquarters. This arrangemenl wilh the Wine Growers Guild look away much of the Association's independence and
Iheir affiliation with the Guild made filling local orders more difficull, causing the Association to losa local customers (Hofer
1983).
In 1950, a fire in the wood frame storage building of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery deslroyed'lhe building, along with
equipment and wine that was in storage. The Association managed 10 salvage some of the equipmeni and conslructed a new,
concrete and steel storage/cellar building with a 800,000 gallon storaga capacity. The Wine Growers Guild had expended and
was one 01 the top five largesl Calilomia companies. Due to financial hardship and the growing induslrial and commercial
developmenl of the Cucamonga area, many of Ihe Association members either sold Iheir ranches or delivered fewer grapes to
the winery. By 1956, the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was nol able 10 meel the production slandards of Ihe Wine Growers
Guild, and in 1957 the Association officially withdrew from Ihe Guild. The Association hoped to sell their wine locally-both to
merchants and olher wineries. Cucamonga Pioneer Winery kept their operation costs low by crushing grapes for other
companies and also by selling their wina Ihrough the Brookside Winery (Hofer 1983).
In 1959, the Association's wine maker died, resulting in further cooperation with Brookside. W~out Iheir winemaker, the
Association lacked the expertise 10 process their grapes inlo wine. The Brookside Winery, located on Ihe former s~e of the
Italian Vineyard Company, was forced to dismantle due to expansion of the Ontario airport. The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery
purchased some of Brookside's equipmenl and moved It to their winery, and Brookside look over managemenl of the Pioneer
Winery. The remaining lour members of the Association became members of the Brookside Vineyard Company and leased
Ihe Cucamonga Pioneer Winery 10 Brookside in 1960. By 1972,Ihe Associalion's cooperalive dissolved. Brookside continued
to lease portions of the winery until 1975.
Evaluation
The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Dislrict was evaluated within the conlext of Call1omia and Cucamonga wineries during the
first half of the twentieth century. The period of significance for the dislrict has been defined as 1935 to 1950, during the active
years of the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association althe winery. Allhough three of the extant properties (Map References
A, C, and D) were constructed prior to the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association's ownership of the winery, the 1913
Sanborn Fire Insurance Map indicates that the floor plans of the Distillery and the Fermentation Building (Map References C
and D) were changed slightly between their original construction and Ihe Pioneer Winery improvements. Therefore, Ihe extanl
winery buildings, including Ihose conslructed circa 1905, look today much as Ihey did under the direction of the Cucsmonga
Pioneer Vineyard Association and retain integri1y 10 Ihe defined era of significance. Properties within the Dislrictlhat conlribute
to its significance include the Scale House, Boiler Building, Distillery, Fermentation Building, Storage/Cellar Building, Crusher
and Rail Spur (Map References A"B, C, 0, E, F, and I).
The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District appears to be eligible for listing in Ihe CRHR under Crileria A. The Cucamonga
Pioneer Winery was Ihe first cooperatively owned winery in Ihe Cucamonga Valley and Ihe Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard
Association made signiflcanl conlributions 10 the developmenl of Ihe Cucamonga grape and wine induslry during the first half
of the 20" cenlury.
The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Dislricl also appears 10 be eligible under Crileria 8 and C. Signiflcanl members of the
commun~ were members of Ihe cooperative and were instrumental in its operation, including Hugh Thomas, Harry DeBerard,
Benton Ballou, George L. Belcher and Paul B. Hofer. Also, Ihe extant buildings are representative 01 winery construction In
Califomia during Ihe first half of the twentieth cenlury. The buildings relain integrity and despite some modem alterations and
deterioralion due 10 age and misuse, Ihey are represenlative of appearance of the winery during the era of significance.
DPR 523J (1/95) Ploneer_winery.doc
'Requlred InlOnnatlOn~ S
Page.1L ol-M....
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
'Resource Identifier:
'Date 21 Aoril 2003
1
X Continuation
o Updale
Evaluation (continued)
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously idenlified Ihe Cucamonga Pioneer Winery as a Potential Local, State, or
National Landmark, allhough formal evalualion was not previously compleled (City of Rancho Cucamonga 1994). The
Cucamonga Pioneer Winery is locally significant as a cooperative winery whose members were well-known citizens of the
Cucamonga area. The extant buildings are a physical representation of the once Ihriving wine industry and the first member
owned cooperative winery in the Cucamonga area.
DPR 523J (1/95) Pionee,-w1nery.doc
"Required InfonnatJon~'
Page ~ of ..M. 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonlla Pioneer Winerv District
'Recorded by: A. Wesson C. Hackino and K. Erickson 'Date Recorded: APril 23 2003 181 Continuation 0 Updale
,/
'/
"/
," "
~'"
1~/
....{~
, ,
/.",~~"-
"".'/.:i':t ~ --
J'~ ..f~"/ ~) .......
~'" 0-<1; - - -.dri. - - ---- -,.- - - ..<=",,, --...
.... flw"{_I. ..... ' At ,;:;; . .h_... .
o f7 0 ,'oi:. :..-:,...., E_no ,.t 0-....'
"ffr",~n,,'n.9 ND.,' ( \,/ -....:;- ti~: ",' ~ :
o fJ_, o\..~ I !\" tHtI(1I!! ~ L. J
,~."... w..... ..0.1'.... ':t!: ,. ~-,;;.",,.
'"cr''' ,';ii I. M ~. NJ -...... .. ~.~................
o/~._.~.~ R_r.... '0 11;_ ~ .~ "'- "'.
o 0' I ..... .........= r.-:-O" I ,-
',IfJ ~.
" Jti-,
., .
-:~;ST"..LERY ~$!JI.
.. -~""L
II'~ ~~.. I ~~
&._-_. .....-' ~
, :S/"PPln.'t~~.: ."'"'~
-....,""'.......-- I'
.. ... I"'IJ /. / . bt:i'
',OIS............ I,
"Y!nc 'll. ,"Ii I I
.:j'I9..~~.... :~..~ r J
~ _.. -yO' 1~ t I
h_ 0 ,......r.. gj'li:: '!;l] J,
.. ..0....-.).. 0 .0::: ~ \.
I ,......~... _~. ~ J I ~
. ;' " ~ I, ~~
~ ...... ..4"'''11I,I''''0', lli: I,
I .. 9_,.. -"'. .. x l' -:.
I I' "-
,~!=-::---_.~"'"- .:_- ~lif.;~fr-
. J~! ~
~~_:___j<.c,_~.lm~-
I eo.
N. e~~
_t .;;;l: J., ~
F.
V,NcYHHLi
65
~
HAVEN
AV.
1J!!l Ct.lCRAlON~R WINERY
i.~ /AlIL~e; ~ R.T.fS'./:"Dep07::
(S~ Irrr ~..)
~ i
" W,M Slgp. "
, 0,,'..---0 I
., ,
to~i__~..
:/ 14'_....0 \ A.
" ,
/ F#r/71~"Mg Rm\
.
r!i
,='
...
t"J
--
~
.
\
"
. ,
: )-
,
0'
,
,
.
,c-. ..
W.
63
..
01
Pro ~~. '-'::~~-...l'ft., ~_.,
!.':5?T4:_ """""",.",.'.~~r$41r1l1!"..,,_ll:
."i? "". r_. c..." ........... ~ __ I!I1ICC" WIOl~ (
.~M',w$ ~..LK w.1Jwwr.-Ift.MI~
.r.~~~p~,..rss~ /'MIN""""
^~rsr._ -.-t IJ" M:IU,o $n#IW /IN~r
r.'~ aiWN$,.~".'r, SllO:r~1r' __~.
.._I'III'l:.''''''''?'f1.SI:.!,6'.J--..f'Wr.r.....".,..,........
.i.;X"Jl'1I.t""'I!'.I'7,lIW'~
~
~"-
...'
"
c.
.f....
.1
,
I
,
.
(iO'
*Not to Scale
,
. ,
..;_u~~
MARINE
AV.
1'1.... A" Y ,,:, ... ~.
~ J1>:Y '-1
'~'''''''''.I._-
: -- __...r
I -; '00(-.0.\.""""'''_
~;;UL-::r~~__ ..
..'~--- iii
~ ~_=IJOi~==-
-.-
mrfllJil ==:'~E=s
If-HIB!I .. '"~ ..
<==,-
.__-<'~:W-"'=
';' .. ~ ~
~ - _ "lIODI'
~~:r'lK="I=':-1
+ ...-.....---.-1
e:=;:J:~~'::'':~
,
.
.r~
~\i~~
~1.
~.~ .
~h~
.
~
.
.
"~U,_
%
Figure I: Detail of the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of "Guasti".
This map depicts portions of the Cucamonga Pioneer WineI)' District.
DPR 523L (1/95)
~7
'Required infonnatlon
Page..ll...ol~
'Resource Name or # (Assigned by Recorder) Cucamonaa Pioneer WinerY District
*A1.
/'.2.
'A3.
'A4.
'AS.
'A6.
'A7.
'A8.
Dimensions: a. Length 230 m (N/S) x b. Width 197 m (ElWl
Method 01 Measurement: 0 Paced 0 Taped 0 Visual estimate 181 Other: GPSlMaooina
Method 01 Determination (Check any Ihat apply.): 181 Artifacts 0 Features 0 Soil 0 Vegetation 0 Topography
o Cut bank 0 Animal burrow 0 Excavation 181 Properly boundary 0 Other (Explain):
Reliability 01 Determination: 0 High 181 Medium 0 Low Explain:
limitations (Check any that apply): 0 Restricted access 181 Pavedlbuilt over 0 Sita limits incompletely defined
181 Disturbances 0 Vegetalion 0 Other (Explain):
Depth: 0 None 181 Unknown Method of Determination:
Human Remains: 0 Present 0 Absent 0 Possible 181 Unknown (Explain): Unlikelv due to 'the nalure of Ihe resource,
Features: (Number, brieUy describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch
map.): Four loci and two isolates were recorded. Please refer to A5 - Cultural Constituents.
Cultural Constiluents: (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc.. not essociat.Kl with leatures.)
Locus 1: This historic artilact scatter is located on the north side of a concrete tank at the northern periphery 01 the winery
parcel. Artifacts w~hin the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments, as well as fragments of brown,
green, olive, and clear container glass. Other artifacts included unidentifiable metal objects, nails, bottle tops, staples,
bolts, screws, and pull-tops Irom beer cans. ,
Locus 2: This historic artifact scatter is located around a circular concrete waler tank in Ihe northwest comer of the winery
parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted 01 white decoraled earthenware Iragments, as well as fragments 01 cobalt,
brown, green, olive, pink, clear, and 'milk" wilhin the scatter glass. Other artifacts included brick fragments, unidentifiable
metal fragments, coils, barbed wire, modem beer bottles, bottle caps, rool sheeting, an old five-rung ladder, and pull-tops
from beer cans.
See Continuation Sheet.
Were Specimens Collected? 181 No 0 Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and Identify where specimens are curated.)
Site Condition: 0 Good 181 Fair 0 Poor (Describe disturbances.): The resource has been disturbed by
plowingldiscing. Several structures are no longer present that were known to have been in existence in 1913 (based on
Sanborn Map).
Neerest Water: (Type, distance, and direction.) Deer Creek is located approx. 457 meters (1499 feet) to the southwest 01
the Winery. The Cucamonga Creek is located approximately 2.4 kilometers (7999 feet) 10 the wesl 01 the s~e location.
Elevation: 1150 feet above mean sea level.
Environmental Setting: (Describe cullurally relevant variables such es vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landfonn, slope, espect.
exposure, etc.) The area is a relatively flat agricultural area. NO native habitat exists in the vicin~. Soils are light brown
silly sands (Quatemary alluvial Ian deposits).
Historical Inlormation: A historic artilact scatter (temporarily recorded as HA-1) is located approx. 25 meters (82 feet) to
the south 01 the District. A historic railroad spur (temporarily recorded as HA-2) is located approx. 75 meters (246 leet)
to Ihe south of the District. Resource HA-2 ties into an easl-west running railroad track recorded as p-36-006847 (a
portion of the historic Kite-Shaped Track/Belt Line), thaI connected portions of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino
and Riverside Counties.
Age: 0 Prehistoric 0 Prolohistoric 01542_176901769-184801848-18801811880-19141811914-1945
181 Post 1945 0 Undetennlned Describe position In regional prehistoric chronology or lactual historic dates If known.
Amethyst glass was produced between 1880-1916. Maywood Glass Co. makers marks (circa 1958). Gallo Glass CO.
makers marks (1966 or laler).
Interpretations: (DiscuSs data potential, lunclion[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations) Loci 1 and 2 appear to date to
post 1945, based on makers marks, allhough older deposits may underlie the surlace. Locus 3, a sparse brick scatter,
conlained no diagnostic artilacts and is nol considered a potential contributor. The bricks may be the remains of a
water tank (no longer extanl) shown in the same general location on Ihe 1913 Sanborn Map. Locus 4 is very rich and
dense lor a surlace scatter, and contains a wide variety of domestic artifacts. Locus 4 may date to Ihe late 1800's or
early 1900's, as amelhyst was observed.
See Continuation Sheet.
Remarks: Only Ihe eastem edge 01 Locus 3 will be impacted by construction associated with Ihe Haven Avenue Grade
Separation Project. Locus 3 does not appear to be eligible for the CRHR individually or as a contributor to the District.
References: (Documents, Infonnants, maps, and other references) Calilomia Stale Engineering Departmenl, Detail Irrigation
Map, Ontario Sheel, (Irrigation Dala, 1888); Glass Bottles: Basic Identification (Jim Rock, 1981); Sanbom Fire Insurance
Company Map 'Guasll~ (1913).
Photographs (Ust subjects, direction 01 view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):
Original MedialNegatives kept at: URS Corooralion. 2020 East First St.. Ste. 400. Santa Ana. CA 92705
'A9.
A10.
A11.
'A12.
A13.
A14.
A15.
A16.
. A 17. Form Prepared by.
Affiliation and Address:
A. Wesson. and C. Hackina Date: 23 Aoril 2003
URS Corooralion. 2020 Easl First 51.. Ste. 400. Sanla Ana. CA 92705
'Required Informatio",<6
DPR 523C (1195)
Stale of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATiON
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page ~ of --11.. 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonqa Pioneer Winery Oistricl
'Recorded by: A. Wesson and C, Hackinq 'Date Recorded 21 April 2003 181 Continuation 0 Update
'AS. Cultural Constituents (Continued)
Locus 3: This sparse historic artifact scatter is located in Ihe southeaslern quadranl of Ihe winery parcel, in a
plowed'field soulh of the boiler building. Arlifacts within Ihe scatter consisled mainly of brick fragments and a
few unidenlifiable metal fragments.
Locus 4: This historic artifact scatter exlends along Ihe enlire weslern perimeler of Ihe winery parcel. The scatter
also exlends along the western half of the soulhern perimeler of Ihe parcel. Artifacls within Ihis scatter are
similar 10 those found in Loci 1 and 2, however amethyst 91ass was noled in Ihe artifacl deposits along the
boundaries of Ihe properly line, Mosl of Ihe artifacls were observed between the perimeler fence and Ihe
paved surface of Marine Avenue and Humbolt Avenue. These artifacls may be associaled wilh the Boarding
House (no longer exlant) shown on Ihe 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map in the wesl cenlral portion
of Ihe winery parcel (page 13).
Isolale A consisls of a fragmenl of amelhyst conlainer glass.
Isolate B consisls of a ceramic sailor doll's head.
'A13. Interpretations (Continued)
Locus 4 may be associated with Ihe Boarding House shown on the 1913 Sanborn Map near Ihe weslern perimeter
of the parcel. Loci 1, 2, and 4 are considered polentially conlributing elemenls 10 the Dislrict. They have nol been
lesled/evaluated, bulthey may contain inlacl primary archaeological deposits eligible for CRHR inclusion under
Criterion O.
Figure 3: Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Southern California, Neck Label. Found oulside the weslern wall of the
Fermenlalion Building (Figure 4: Map Reference 0).
DPR 523L (1/95)
'Required infonmatlo~ 1
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page ~ of 31 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) CucamonQa Pioneer Winery Oistricl
'Recorded by: A. Wesson and C, Hackino 'Date Recorded 21 April 2003 181 Continuation 0 Update
Figure 3: Bottle body label: Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Southern California, Port Wine, Cucamonga District.
Found oulside Ihe weslern wall of Ihe Fermentation Building (Figure 4: Map Reference 0).
Figure 4: Bollle body label: Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Soulhern California, Zinfandel Wine, Cucamonga
Oislricl. Found oulside the western wall of Ihe Fermentation Building (Figure 4: Map Reference 0).
DPR 523L (1/95)
'Required information 7 tJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page ~ of 34 "Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonoa Pioneer Winerv Dislricl
'Recorded by: A. Wesson and C, Hackino 'Date Recorded 21 April 2003 (8] Continuation 0 Updale
Figure 5: Overview of Locus 1, view 10 Ihe easl
Figure 6: Represenlative sample of artifacls from Locus 1
DPR 523L (1/95)
'Required information 7 /
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page -1!L- of 34 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonaa Pioneer Winerv District
'Recorded by: A, Wesson and C, Hackina 'Date Recorded 21 April 2003 181 Continuation D Update
Figure 7: Overview of Locus 2, view to Ihe soutih
Figure 8: Representalive sample of artifacts from Locus 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DPR 523L (1/95)
'Required Information 72.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California,~ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENTOF PARKS AND RECREATiON
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
, Trinomial
Page ~ of 34 "Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) CucamonQa Pioneer Winery Districl
'Recorded by: A. Wesson and C. Hackino 'Date Recorded 21 April 2003 !81 Continuation 0 Update
Figure 9: Ceramic sailor doll head (Isolale B)
DPR 523L (1/95)
'Required Information 73
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
Page 20 of 34
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
Pi. Other Identifier: Scale House
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publlcalion X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W; ~'4 of
c, Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho CucamonQa
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
*e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #. directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
I
3D
I
Date
I
A
I
SE'4 of Sec...11.; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
I
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is localed within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery properly, which Is located on a reclangular lot measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feel. The scale house is located on the east side of the winery near the gate Ihat faces
Haven Avenue.
I
I
The scale house is a one-story, wood frame building with a concrete slab foundation. The building faces east and has a
rectanguiar shape. The exterior wall surface is horizonlal wood siding and the side gable roof has exposed rafter ends
and is clad with composition shingles, The single enlry on the front of the building has a weed surround and has been
boarded over. There is a shed roof porch over the door that has a wood floor and a shed roof supported by weed posts.
The windows are weed framed double hung and casement windows w~h wood sills and surrounds. Several of the
windows have been boarded over. There are metal awnings over some of the windows.
See continuation sheet
I
I
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) IHP8l Industrial buildino. IHP6) Commercial buildino under 3 stories
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Element of District 0 Other
P5a. Photo or Drawing
I
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
View northwest
21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1905-1910
(Hofer 1983: Sanborn maos 1913
and 1929)
'P7. Owner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274S, Turner
Ontario. California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. URS Corn
7720 N. 16'" Slreel. Ste 100
Phoenix Arizona 85020
'pg. Dale Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survev
I
I
I
I
I
I
P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Wesson Alex. Christine HaCkina. and Kirsten I
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaration Initial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort, URS Corooration. Santa Ana.
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Skelch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 Dlslrict Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record I
o Artifact Record 0 Photograph Record 0 Other (List)
DPR 523A (1195) PW_A.doc
'Required Information 7 tf I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Primary #
HRlfTrinomial
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Page.2L of...M.....
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
'Resource Identifier: A
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
Description (continued)
There is a shed roof extension on the south side of the building, which served as a service window for the truck scale. The roof
of the extension has exposed rafters and is clad with composition shingles. The public window has an aluminum awning over a
boarded over window. There are also windows on the east and west sides of the extension, which are also boarded over. All
windows on Ihe extension have wood sills and surrounds, The lruck scale is located to Ihe south of the building. It is 20 feet
long and has a concrete base and a metal frame, The scale itseil is constructed of wood planks, which are joined with bolts
and metal.
There are three windows on the west side of the building thaI have been boarded over. All of the windows have aluminum
awnings and wood frames, sills, and surrounds. There is one, weed, paneled door with one lighl, which has been partially
boarded over. The single entry is accessed by two concrete steps.
The only features on the north side of the building are two windows thaI have been boarded over, These windows also have
weed frames, sills, and surrounds.
The Scale House is depicted on the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Indicating it was constructed by the CWA in 1905. The
scale house likely served as an administrative area, as well as the place were truck weights were recorded.
Truck Scaie (view west)
DPR 523J (1/95) PW_Adoc
.Requlred Infonnatlon 7 b
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Stalus Code
D
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
Date
Page..1L of ~
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
B
P1.
P2.
'a.
'b.
c,
d.
'*e.
Other Identifier: Boiler Buildino
Location: 0 Nol for Publication X Unrestricted
County San Bernardino (P2c.P2e. and P2b or P2d, Attach Location Map as necessary.)
USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W; ~'4 of
Address 8812 Haven Avenue CUy Rancho Cucamonoa
UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource. elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
SE'4 of Sec.....11.; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
*P3a. Description: {Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries}
The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery District. which is localed on a rectangular 101 measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feet. The boiler building is located on the east side of the winery, east of Ihe distillery.
The boiler building is a one and a hail story, masonry structure with a concrete slab foundation. The front gable roof is
clad with corrugaled metal and has exposed rafter ends. There Is a paired set of vents located in each gable end, which
are each made up of six square openings (2 over 4, stacked). The front entrance consists of two, sliding, metal doors
on a metallrack, Two window openings on the front of the building have been sealed wilh brick, There are two, metal
smokestacks on the roof of the, building. The smokestacks are located just south of the middle of the roof, with one on
each side of the ridgeline, On the wesl side of Ihe building, two window openings have been bricked in and there is one
sliding metal door with a metallrack. There are Ihree bricked in window openings on the easl side and one bricked in
window opening on Ihe south side. At Ihe northwest comer of the building lies an oval-cylindrical wooden tank labeled
"Brrokside Vineyard Co.".
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) IHP8l Industrial buildina
'P4. Resources Present: X BUilding 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Element of District 0 Other
P5a. Photo or Drawing
.~.. ""'';'
,it;.
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date. accession #)
View soulh
__ 21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1936
(Hofer 1983: Sanbom maos 1913
and 1929)
'P7. Owner and Address;
Paul Hofer
11274S, Turner
Ontario. California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirslen Erickson. URS ColD
7720 N. 16m Street Sle 100
Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive surveY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P11. Report Citation': (Cite survey repori and other sources. or enter "none".) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino. and Kirsten I
Erickson. 2003, Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Sludv Apoendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort. URS Corooration. Santa Ana,
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Sketch Map DConlinuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear Fealure Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record I
o Artilact Record 0 Photograph Record 0 Other (List)
DPR 523J (1i95) PW_B.doc
'Requlred Inforrnatlon 7? I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
'Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
o
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
Date
Page -1L of ~
'Resource Name or #; (Assigned by recorder)
C
P1. Other Identifier: Distillerv
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e. and P2b or P2d, Attach Loeetion Map as necessary.)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasli Date 1966 (1981\ T 1S; R 7W; ~y. of
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonoa
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
.e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc.. as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
SE Y. of Sec...11.: 12088.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
"'P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations. size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is located wilhin the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery Dislrict, which is localed on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feet. The boiler building is located on the east side of 100 winery, south of the fermentation
building and west of the boiler building.
The Distillery is a one and one half slory, wood frame building with a three-story tower. The building's foundation is
concrete slab and the exterior wall surface is redwood board and batten siding. The front gable roof is clad with
standing seam metal and composition roll. There is a single entry. metal door and a metal sliding track door on the front
of the building, The windows on the front of the building are wood frame, double hung windows with wood lrames and
surrounds, which have been barred and boarded over, These windows appear to have originally been six-over-six lighl
windows, however, many of the muntins are missing.
See continuation sheet
'P3b. Resource Attributes; (List attributes and codes) (HP8l Industrial bulldino
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Elemenlof District 0 Other
P5a. Photo or Drawing
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
View soulh
21 Aoril2003
'P6. Dale Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehlsloric 0 Both
Circa 1905-1910
(Hofer 1983: Sanborn maos 1913
and 1929)
'P7. OWner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274 S. Turner
Ontario. California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. URS COrD
7720 N. 16'" Slreet. Sle 100
Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 APril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Inlensive survev
P11. Report Citation': (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino. and Kirslen
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaration Initial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cullural Resources Technical
Reoort, URS Corooration. Santa Ana.
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Skelch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear'Feature Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artifact Record 0 Pholograph Record 0 Other (Lisl)
DPR 523A (1/95) PW_C.doc
.Requlred Infonnation 77
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRlITrinomial
Page ~ of..M-
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
"Resource Identifier: C
.Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation
o Update
I
Description (continued)
I
The window and door openings on the south side of the building have been boarded over or covered with metal. There is a
wood, sliding door Ihal is reinlorced with metal on the east side of the building. On the west side, there is one single entry
metal door and one wood sliding door that is reinforced with metal. There are also two. double hung, wood frame windows
wilh wood sills and surrounds, The glass has been removed from the windows.
I
There is a tower located on the southwest comer of the building, which housed the still. The window openings in Ihe three
story tower are empty or have been boarded over, There is a visor roof extending out from ail four sides of Ihe tower. which is
located about half way up the tower or at the top of the second story of the tower. The roof of the tower is a side gable roof.
Both the visor and gable roofs are clad with compos~ion material.
I
I
I
DPR 523J (1i95) PW_C.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
*Requlred Infonnatlon 7<6 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California ~ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATiON
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP'Status Code
o
Date
o
SE '.4 of Sec~; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials. condition. alterations. size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery District, which Is located on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feet. The fermentauon building is located on the northeast comer of the winery properly,
north of the distillery and boiler building and west of Ihe crusher.
DPR 523A (1/95) PW_D.doc
The fermentation building is a one and one hail story, wood frame building with a concrete slab foundation. The exterior
wall surface is red wood board and batten siding, The front gable roof is clad with composition material covered with
corrugated metal and has exposed rafter ends. Six vents are located on the roof at the ridgeline. There are two, sliding
door openings on Ihe front of the building, The doors have been removed and, at one time, were replaced wilh a
grouping of windows, The door openings are currenuy boarded over, but remnanls of wood frame screens are still
visible, There are concrete ramps iocated below both door openings, Metal pipes protrude from the front of the building,
which extend across the yard and into the disullery building. These pipes are supported by two vertical, metal poles,
See continuation sheet
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8l industrial buildino
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Element of District 0 Other
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date. accession #)
View northwest
21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Bolh
Circa 1905-1910
(Hofer 1983: Sanborn maos 1913
and 1929\
.P7. Owner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274 S. Turner
Onlario. California 91761
.P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. URS COrD
7720 N. 16'" Street. Ste 100
Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'pg. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survey
P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none",) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackina. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003, Haven Avenue Grade Seoaration Initial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort, URS Coroorauon. Santa Ana,
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Slructure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 Milling Stauon Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artiiact Record 0 Pholograph Record 0 Other (List)
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
I
I
I
Page ~ of 2L
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
P1. Other Identifier: Fermenlation Buildlno
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d, Attach Location Map as necessary.)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981\ T 1S; R 7W; ~'.4 of
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho CUC8monoa
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
*e. Other locations I Data: (e.g., parcel #. directions to resource, elevation, etc.. as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
PSa', Photo or Drawing
..,--------~
,-- -'.'-.
*Required In~nnatlon 19
~
'State'
'. PEP'~
..... ,~\~~..t;. "'~"'.'"
;i.c.o~:rU~. ~
"''';_':';~''''">'"'''""....,-,....",'C'' ' ..
Page.22.... of..M...
Recorded by: Kirslen Erickson
I
I
'Resource Identifier:
'Dale 21 Aoril 2003 X Conlinualion 0 Updale
I
Description (continued)
I
There are two sliding wood doors on the rear of Ihe building wilh metallracks. A lean-Io extension is iocated on Ihe northwest
comer of Ihe building, which has a shed roof thaI is clad with slanding seam melal. There is a sliding wood door on Ihe west
side of the lean-to extension .An engine protrudes from the back wall of the building, which is supported by wood brackets.
There are no windows on the rear of the building.
I
Two sliding wood docr openings are localed on Ihe easl side of Ihe building. The doors have a metal upper track, a wood
base, and a wood door surround. Melal pipes prolrude from Ihe east side of the building and extend 10 Ihe west side of the
crusher building.
There are two sliding wood doors on the wesl side of the building. There are remnanls of a shed roofed slructure Ihal was
attached to Ihe north end of the west side of the building, which may have sheltered equipment. There is an existing shed-
roofed structure near Ihe south end of the wesl side, which serves as a sheller sump pumps. The pumps were localed in
concrele box structures Ihal are mostly located benealh Ihe ground surface. The shed roof sheller has a corrugated melal
roof. There is also an engine mounled near the roofline on Ihe west side of Ihe building.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DPR 523J (1/95) PW_D.doc
.Required Information <30 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRi#
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
o
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
Date
Page.xL of..M-
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
E
P1.
P2.
'a.
'b.
c,
d,
. *e.
Other Identifier: Storaoe/Celiar Buildino
Location: 0 Not lor Publication X Unreslrlcled
County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e. and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.)
USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W; ~Yo of
Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonoa
UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #. directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
SE Yo of Sec....11.; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
.P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design. materials, condition, alterations. size, setting, and boundaries)
The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 70D- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The storage/cellar building
Is localed in Ihe northwesl portion of the winery properlY, west of the fermentation building.
The storage/cellar building has two stories and faces east. It is constructed of poured concreie and has a concrele
foundation, The exterior wall surface is exposed poured concrete and the roof is flat. There is a lower roofed extension
or addition on the front of the building, which is entered through a metal, sliding track door. Four, nine-light awning
windows with metal frames are located on Ihe fronl of the building. The windows have casl concrete sills and there is an
aluminum awning localed over one of the windows. There are letters mounted 10 the front of the building spelling
'Brookside Vineyard Co, B 39." Metal pipes prolrude from the fronl of the building and extend across the yard and enter
into the fermentation building. The pipes are supported by metal towers,
See continuation sheet..
"P3b. Resource Attributes: (Ust attributes and codes) (HP8) Induslrial buildino
"P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Sile 0 District X Element of District 0 Other
PSa. Pholo or Drawing
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date. accession #)
View wesl
21 Aoril 2003
"P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1950
(Hofer 1983: Sanborn maos 1913
and 1929)
'P7. OWner and Address;
Paul Hofer
11274S. Turner
Ontario. Calilomia 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirslen Erickson URS Coro
7720 N. 16'" Street. Ste 100
Phoenix Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
"P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survey
P11. Report Citation": (Cite sUlVey report and other sources. or enter "none",) Wesson. Aiex. Christine Hackino. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaralion Initial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort. URS Corooration. Sanla Ana
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Skelch Map X Continuation Sheel 0 Building, Structure and Objecl Record
o Archaeological Record 0 Distnct Record 0 Linear Fealure Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artilact Record 0 Photograph Record 0 Other (List)
DPR 523A (1i95) PW_E.doc
-Required Infonnationeg /
I
Slate of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF'PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINLlATION SHEET
Page.1!L of..M...
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
Primary #
HRllTrinomial
I
"Resource Identifier: E
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
I
Description (continued)
I
There are four windows on Ihe south side of the building-three metal framed hopper windows wilh 16 lighlS and one metal
framed, 3-light hopper window, The hopper window has a cast concrete sill, a wood surround and is covered with a metal
security grille. There are, also two doors on the soulh side-one, wood paneled, single entry door near the east end of the
south side and one, metal sliding door with a metal track and a concrete ramp. There is also a metal single enlry door located
wilhin the Sliding door.
I
The entry on the north side is a metal double entry door. There are also two large openings that' have been sealed with
concrete on the north side. A concrete slab is located to the north of the building and photographs taken in Ihe 1980s Indicate
that a portion 01 the concrete slab was the foundation to a wood frame shed that was attached to Ihe north side of the
storage/cellar building, There are round, wood structures supported by concrete bases located on the concrele slab to the
north of the former shed location and a pipe runs lrom the fermentation building to the vicinity of the wood slructures. This area
may have been used to fill barrels for shipping.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North Side of the Storage/Cellar Building (view southeast)
I
I
I
I
I
Wood Structures Located North of the Storage/Cellar Building
I
DPR 523J (1/95) PW_E.doc
'Requlred InfOrmation<? 2. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
o
Date
F
SE 11. of See _11.; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design. materials, condition, alterations. size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is localed within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The crusher is located in
the eastern portion of the winery property, easl of Ihe fermentation building and north of the scale house.
DPR 523A (1/95) PW].doc
The one story crusher building has a frame constructed of iron and wood, and is anchored 10 a concrete slab. The sides
of the building and gable roof of the building are corrugated metal and Ihe roof has exposed rafter ends. There are
conveyors extending from the north and soulh sides of the building, which empty into large concrete dumping pits, A
truck conveyor and truck loading area are located on the east side of the building. The building shelters the crusher
mechanism and electrical boxes thaI once controlled the crusher, conveyors, sump pumps, and must pump, An iron
pipe extends lrom the roof of the crusher to the easl side of the fermentation building,
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8) Industrial buildino
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Element of District 0 Other
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View. date, accession #)
View west
21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1936
(Hofer 1983' Sanborn maos 1913
and 1929)
'P7. Owner and Address;
Paul Hofer
11274 S. Turner
Onlario. Call1omia 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. URS Coro
7720 N. 16'" Street. Ste 100
.Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survey
P11. Report Citation': (CUe survey report and other sources, or enter 'none",) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003, Haven Avenue Grade Seoaration Initial Sludv Aooendix S: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technicai
Reoort. URS Corooration, Santa Ana
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Localion Map 0 Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artifact Record 0 Pholograph Record 0 Other (List)
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
I
I
I
Page.-6lL of.2L
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
P1. Other Identifier: Crusher
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d, Attach Location Map as necessary,)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W: ~y. of
c, Address 8812 Haven Avenue C~ Rancho Cucamonoa
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
. We. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
See continuation sheet
"Required Infonnation <83
Slate of California;"" The Resources Agency
, DEi>ARTMENT OF. PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Page ~ of M-
Recorded by: Kirslen Erickson
Primary #
HRllTrlnomiai
'Resource Identifier: F
'Date 21 April 2003
X Continuation
o Update
Description (continued)
Concrele Dumping Pil (view northwesl)
Detail of Crusher Mechanism (view west)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DPR 523J (1i95) PW_F.doc
'Required Infonnatlon~ t( I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Slate of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Stalus Code
Date
G
SE Y. of Sec --11.; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
.P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Indude design, materials, condition, alterations. size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is located within lhe Pioneer Cucamonga Winery. which is iocated on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 70D- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The water tank is iocated
in the northwest comer 01 the winery complex.
DPR 523J (1/95) PW_G.doc
The waler tank is conslrucled of poured concrele. The building is circular and once had a wood frame roof with wood
shingles, which is mostly collapsed. Rebar rungs attached to the south side of the tank provide ladder access to Ihe
inlerior of the water tank. There Is an associated outbuilding to the south of the lank that may have served as a motor or
pump shed. It is a square, concrele block building with pipes running through the walls and along the floor. The wood
framed hipped roof is clad wilh composition material and has exposed rafter ends. The door has been removed and
there is a wire mesh transom opening above the doorway. Electrical boxes are attached to the inlerior walls.'
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8l Industrial buildino
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District X Elemenl of District 0 Other
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
View northeast
21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1936-1950
(Hofer 1983: Sanbom maos 1913
and 1929\
'P7. Owner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274 S. Turner
Ontario. California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affilialion, and eddress)
Kirslen Eri~n URS COrD
7720 N. 16 Slreet. Ste 100
Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive survev
P11. Report Citation': (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none',) Wesson Alex. Chrisline Hackino. and Kirslen
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaralion Initial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort. URSCorooration Santa Ana.
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Skelch Map 0 Conlinuation Sheel 0 Building, Structure and Object
Record 0 Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 MIlling Station Record 0 Rock Art
Record 0 ArlIIact Record 0 Photograph Record 0 Other (List)
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
I
I
I
Page ~ of..M....
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
P1. Other Identifier: Water Tank
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W; ~y. of
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue CUy Rancho Cucamonoa
d. UTM: (Give more than one lor large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 :
'e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.. parcei #, direclions to resource, elevation, etc.. as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
PSa. Photo or Drawing
-Required Informati01?S
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Stalus Code
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
Date
Page 2L of-1L
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
H
P1. Other Identifier: House
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1S; R 7W; ~y., of
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cueamonoa
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large andlor linear resources) Zone 11 .
*e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.. parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc.. as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
~y., of Sec -11.: 1208 8.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
.P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design. materials, condition, alterations, size. setting, and boundaries)
The building is ioeated within Ihe Pioneer Cueamonga Winery, which is loeated on a rectangular lot measuring
approximately 70D- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The residence is located
near the center OIlhe winery property, jusl south of the cellarlslorage building.
The one-story, wood frame residence faces north and has a concrete foundation. The exterior wall surface is horizontal
siding. The front gable roof and shed roof extension are clad with composition roll, The front entry is a single entry,
wood, paneled door with a gable roofed entry porch supported by wood posts, The windows are one-over-one, wood
sash, double hung windows with wood sills and surrounds-2 on the front, 2 on the easl, and 3 on the south side. There
are vents in both gable ends. A wood frame shed is attached 10 the west shed extension of the house, which has a
plywood exterior wall surface and a corrugated metal roof. There is one single entry door in the shed.
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (Ust altJibutes and codes) (HP21 Sinole familv orooertv
'P4. Resources Present: X Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 Dlslrict X Elemenl of Dislrict 0 Other
P5a. Photo or Drawing
.,,{.
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
View southwest
21 Aoril2003
'P6. Date Conslructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1940-1950 (estimated)
'P7. Owner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274 S. Turner
Ontario. California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
KirSlen Erickson URS CorD
7720 N, 16'" Street. Sle 100
Phoenix. Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded;
21 Aoril2003
'P10. Survey Type; (Describe)
Inlensive survev
P11. Report Citation': (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackina. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaratlon Initial StudY Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort, URS Corooration. Santa Ana.
'Attachments: 0 NONE 0 Location Map 0 Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record 0 District Record 0 Linear Feature Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artifact Record 0 Pholograph Record 0 Other (List)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DPR 523J (1/95) PW_H.doc
*Requlred Infonnation~" I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATiON
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Date
SE '/. of Sec..J.1..; 1208 B.M.
Zip 91730
mE! mN
"P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size. setting, and boundaries)
The railroad spur is localed within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular 101 measuring
approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues, The end of Ihe spur is
located on the wesl side of the fermentation building (D) and runs south to the distillery (C). From the distillery the spur
curves to the southwest and runs 10 the edge of the winery property just north of Humboldt Avenue.
The Santa Fe Railroad Spur is approximalely 700 feet long in its currenl condition. The rails are in fair 10 good condition
in the vicinity of the Fermentation Building. Asphalt has been laid in the yard between the Fermentation Building and the
Distillery, and in that area only the tops of the tracks are visible. From south of the distillery, Ihe spur has been buried
under loose soil and some 01 the track may have been removed in this location.
DPR 523A (1195) PW_I.doc
'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) {HP11l Enoineerino structure
'P4. Resources Presenl: 0 Building X Slructure 0 Object 0 S~e 0 District X Element of District D Other
P5b. Description of Photo:
(View, date, accession #)
View soulhwest
21 Aoril 2003
'P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: X Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
Circa 1905-1910: imoroved 1944
{Hofer 1983: 1913 Sanborn maol
'P7. Owner and Address:
Paul Hofer
11274 S, Turner
Ontario California 91761
'P8. Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address)
Kirsten Erickson. URS Coro
7720 N. 16'" Street. Ste 100
Phoenix, Arizona 85020
'P9. Date Recorded:
21 Aoril 2003
'P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Inlensive survev
P11. Report Citation': (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino. and Kirsten
Erickson. 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Seoaration In~ial Studv Aooendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical
Reoort. URS Corooration. Santa Ana,
'Attachments: 0 NONE X Location Map 0 Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet 0 Building, Structure and Object Record
o Archaeological Record X District Record 0 Linear Fealure Record 0 Milling Station Record 0 Rock Art Record
o Artilact Record 0 Pholograph Record 0 Other (List)
Other Listings
Review Code
Reviewer
I
I
I
Page..ll.. of..l!-
'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder)
P1. Other Identifier: Santa Fe Railroad Sour
P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication X Unrestricted
'a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e. and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary,)
'b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasli Date 1966 119811 T 1S; R 7W; ~'/. of
c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonoa
d, UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 .
"e. Other Locatlonal Data: (e,g.. parcel #, direclions to resource, elevation. etc., as appropriate)
APN 209-131-02
See continuation sheet
"'Required Infonnation<3' 7
I
State of California -The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Page~ of~
Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson
Primary #
HRllTrlnomial
I
'Resource Identifier:
'Date 21 Aoril 2003 X Continuation 0 Update
I
Description (continued)
I
The raiis are visible al the edge of the winery properly where Ihey have been cuI off north of Humboldt Avenue and the spur
no longer connects 10 the mainline. There is a steel bumper located at the north end of the track. which stopped the train cars
as they came into the winery.
I
The 1913 Sanbom fire Insurance map indicales the Atkinson, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railroad spur in its currenllocation. A
history of Ihe Cucamonga Pioneer Winery indicates Ihal improvemenls were made to the spur In 1944 (Hofer 1983).
I
I
I
I
I
I
Railroad Spur North of Humboldt Avenue (view northeasl)
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bumper for Raiiroad Cars (view west)
I
DPR 523J (1/95) PWJdoc
'Requtred Informatio~ I
SITE LOCA liON MAP
o
m
z
-4
m
;Ill
~
25TH Sf
~
"
~
z
m
~
9
~
E;l
~~
l!i
l:!In CI
! [J~C
JERSEY AV
D Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District
~,. Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Buildings
IV Railroad Line
Historic Point of Interest Designation
DRC2003-01048
Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
December 2003
008
,.
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
(Part I - Initial Study)
(Please type or print cte.rly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next /ine.)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
(909) 4n-2750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
." .. ....... .... ......... -. ,....... '-':. C-, '._'. .. .. ...... .. .... .. ':.':. ..... :.....<:.:"-:. ..::"..:.,. -,_:.-"'."_. ........:. ,_
project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and
, Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's. Rules and
Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this
application be provided in full. . ,. ,.
Upon review of the.completed Initial Study Part I and the development'application,
additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and'
geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete
unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as
complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' ,
review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to
prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the
applicant will be responsible to payor reimburse the City, its agentS, officers, andlor
consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations,
mitigations; etc., of any special studies or reports.
GENERAL INFORMA nON:
INCOMPLETE APPLlCA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of/he applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform werle required to provide missing
information.
Application Number for the project to which this form pertains:
Project Title: Tx::> yro I " ~ \IV 0+ +0 ("me r . [); 0 f\€E'V" l J...J ~ f\€ '( l .A
Nsme&AddreSsofProje~r(s): ?irHi,oP,Y") 1.1 C - ~LB. Bo-Q:.(" ~~Mft'r
11?..4<2 s. \ l.A.(V\P\"" lA",p ') CJf\+nr\O I Q.A.
Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: ~ vY\../C Ct So cJa:,U~
II
t] 1:IPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentallnfoForml..
Rev.6i30/03
Cfo
Contact Person & Address: W; ll; a. V)'\ bOf>-Q.
'8.<;S<6 ~ ~'('{\..()l'\-\- bl.
~lnro,..,kJ nA .Or20~
Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above):
c::;::::"q,. V"'/\.Q._ o.s a.P.oo u.Q-- .
Te;ephone Number: -c (of)) J ~<X - 9oJ::l
PROJECT INFORMA TION & DESCRIPTION:
Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 1f) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the projecf site, and indicate
the site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and
west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of
significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3) ProjecfLocstion(describe): 9,~\'2. k~\If"rj AVOY\lJM - '1-o(vner-
t.D\{)e.rI1 (\POl (h~\maA-knr,ks.; '6~S+n:>D,r
n ru-t. t-h. \JQ vi f:\ VQ Y\. U.Q _
4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary):
\>avr.ol ~ Qt2..oq- !~I -0'2- -(")CcD
'5) Gross Site Ares (ae/sq. ft.): -' 0 or ('P"'5
'6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed
dedications):
~ \)("(1\i/1 fY'Ct+e..L~ to f.\c~
7) Describe any proposed general plan am dment or zone change which would affect the project site
(attach additional sheet if necessary):
~,,7'~~~~ -t'lr='~;~~.~~\ ~~
t\~l;cn+-LC~t0 ~eJma.Yl a c\.eS~C."(\octIDt'--
\
b \ 0.. h\ c;,,-l-t) ("\ r n \ va -, ""-+ 0-9 T LI"I-\er.e ~
1:\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentallnfoFonn 1.doc
Rev. 6130103
eit
8) Include a description of all permits which will be necesssty from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmentsl
agencies in order to fully implement the project:
~~~~~~~~ ;~~~:;~~~~~Q
S~(\)~ ~l'/")~ \oq_J\G.l'f\b -\Y\IOIASh f\!:jt-',~;cr.-h.:l>iU
9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including infonnation on topography, soil stability,
plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features
described. In addition, cite all sources of infonnstion (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological
surveys, traffic studies):
I
.....,
u...\.
~
l\' L
~(\'5\-i'I.'r,~rl.. ~\bN'\ +hp; Dn{\l,,\ t~OC)IS.To VY\Ost"
.r ' In. \) I CO \ +-1-
1 RIP v:+ I..... ~l L\b ~. :-:>e U..Q....("{', \ b{ ne... VY'cEDYl (j
VJu.';, \cl..-\.f\c..,t" Qy~r.( ~ b€-. \ 1\',\('.Q-~{\to("ce.Cl . \ r1~
{Q \l'Y\..o,la \ &+ne~ S-t-("u.c,A-u.:r~_", uS, U '("'P YY\l)\.l~
a.l t Q,b ~ "(").e+€f"IC'l(o.-krl. cl.r'\n b-p~Y'c\r)u.'5
_bu.,:, lcLl"'~~ SoD f\l\nC'..hPd'
CD CST r l' c1-uXClI A 110..\1\ si... , \I U\"Ct"f;-tz:,Y)~ A,~c.lD..Je.,<, //;,
k4ed I <6 -l2-{j~
@ \:)odr)o 1\ l1'"Hf'.PY"\ ~ :\).e-\efs I Of).~. q - ~~-03
f 0) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of infonnation (books, published reports
and oral histoty):
-rF.;c::. <=..,\+Po, \inc::;o.. LU'd\.er11 C("C)Y'I\ ~. ..Qn{ll.l\
I L;ro's +nr u. l ot,~ .l'h::> _ (")L0(\-exS hcu).R . ~
'\J I c....t-lA.(.e 5 (',H\ ri. C)(" Ct.l ---R ~ b \-t, ,U\ .
\"" \
1:\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentallnfoFo""1,doc
Rev. 6130103
Cf2..
11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect
proposed uses:
-\-\"e'(Q
\p',ll
are... Y\r) v\("')i """'. ~u.rcpc:.. -8'0+
(),.Q..QPC'* \-V\e _ ~ mol 't -II ,,"-tv -to.. ~ .
12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in tenns of ultimate use
that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated compietion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if
necessary:
cu...~ros.-\ns \ ni l UnP fP.VY\6lJf2.-cl. -OroVY\ ~ O.c:'-02c..-lecl_
S\- (u.c..-hA.fe~ ,
~p ("),,)(\..eI""'2, U)',U 'SLL(\)e.'1_-\-11e..s..~+e. +t> de-le.cM\f'r€-
Whcd-- ~d'{\.hers QV\A SVY"ClLlet'" V\ i~("~r ;-ti>fAS
~ ~:.;~~~~rC\\~QC~ ~~ms Lu\tUoo.
V\l\o 00 rt. .i-r, ~e... -t+; '&\-0 (' ; c t:l:-r~ f Ka. (\~ .
(q) t1\e. S~.jp. ID'.U h>.+n+Cd\~ o.\eo..tO,-J O~
\r\cO-("',(ci ("')1l'S ~+(" u.cl-I..l.y'".Q~ ' ,
13) Describe the surrounding properties, including infonnstion on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.):
Q)lhe.. c..", -l-e., ;." ~11iY'\:>rl. (')(\ +he s..ou..+-n ~ c. yO; \ r~
ClV'd. -Li\NIA'f-.+C.o..\ ~n{-k. @ C":>f\. +hP. l~ bu, ~
(L~ " rl Ol'"\.\-;... Q =..uhc\.. '. \) ; <;. \ 'O'iV 0 0\'\ ~ . VYV ~ CVJ
--:t:v'cl\A."&-\-r~ c..) \() \ 1 ~ Ld i ~ ClAd a. yD., "" Y\+ Lot. ~ (\)()
S+ \JQ. Jz.... ' Iou.." l l' '
oject change the pattem, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project?
14)
-c+ \....0-\ LJ {'JI~LLJ} llf\ -\--\ve. v-.e.mo\)a.i eN hC:\.~{d.ou,S
st-( I AC...--\-u..( ~ S r, M. I (1 a. \ l-.e- ('.>0.. V\() ( fY'O. Q 1 () Dc ,( p -t
\ /0. c...n 11\ +- Ln-t-.
1:\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMS\COUNTERlEnvironmentsllnfoForml,doc '
Rev. 6130103
93
15) Indicate the type of shoTt-tenn and long-tenn noise to be generated, inciuding source and amount. How will these noise
levels affect adjacent propeTties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed?
'2::.\--0(+ ~(r(\ XV> I ~D ~ o..~ \0 L\ i l d I'rr:r Ct y' P. he 'I f\C)
~. Y'l'rA l~~d ,~_ 1\("')\<;0../ \J.)\ U V-O. YbI'Y\ I f'a.l
C'H\rl VQ.(LA 9f\n(-t -+-UL'YI
\
'16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: tlr\e.. l\el\/) ltl 0 '^'-'
\.A)'I L\ V'\rlllO. \)QiIA, Ii ++10. e~CJ.\-. (V\ ()1'\1~__::l-r...e.f<:' .
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: ~ LQ 'O-+er"
CloL..t ~S (")(\ +n..Q.. S:,+e. ~e. ()f\ hi wcd-e_r 11~.
(')(\ +ho. ~("(') j cA- u..::>d. \ ~j) ~ () r 'SvJr-L.fif'rY\ ciAl ~
Go\'\+rr'l \ . \)
.
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage, (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please
contact the Cucamongs Caunty Water District at 987-2591.
s. Residential (gaVdsy) f\ I~ Peak use (gsVDay) ~
b. CammercisVlnd. (gsVdsy/ac) {\ J I;l Peak use (gsVrnin/sc) (\ Jf) ,
--t--\ L ~
19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. '(\ /0... 0 Septic Tank V\ /0.. 0 Sewer.
If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation testlf. If discharge to a sanitary se"~fle system is proposed indicate
expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For fuTther cisrification, please contact the
Cucsmongs County Water District at 987-259f.
a. Residential (gaVday)
- (\./o.
- '() 10..
b. CammercisVlndustrial (gaVday/sc)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units:
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size:
V\ !Q
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): VI.
1:\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentallnfoForm l.doc
Rev, 6130103
9tf
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Price(s) $~ to $.1) !f'.{
Rent(permonth) $Jll f{ 10 $J\ I C{
, L ,
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type:
1ljg
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N
24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate' School
Districts as shown in Attachment B:
s. Elementary:
M-q
~
b. Junior High:
c. Senior High
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe type of users) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses:
n!q
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type:
27) Indicate hours of operation:
{\ (Q
28) Number of employees:
Total:_V\ 10,
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
1:\PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvlronmentallnfoForm I.doc:
Rev. 6130103 c;S--
29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate 01
hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
(\ !~
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: vi. /0
,"'I
'31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be
verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
V\/o.
, '2. }((\Q p+- ~ (+he... A~'cP~<s (k' n'\t\l)q.Q Cl vcl
C\/\~~ (,C""\V\.-t\/")\ r\\1(1.~ dP\')\nD'\+IO,,"-,
ALL PROJECTS
32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to detennine their ability to
provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response,
{\ (q
33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials?
Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and
herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above.
Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if
known.
1\)0
1:IPLANNINGIFINAl IFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentsllntoForm I.doc
Rev, 6130103 9' ,
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials,
including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and
proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and
labeled on the application plans. '
m S't-Oo~ -Qo( -U\o. A~tes.-hs ~ rYlOl~
I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
tot he best of my, knowledge and betief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an
adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Title:~Y
Date: J 0 ,.::;);3-03
Signature.
1:IPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentallnfoFonnl,doc Rev, 6130/03 q 7
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: DRC2003-01048
2. Related Files:
3. Description of Project: A request to designale the Pioneer Winery, located al 8812 Haven
Avenue as a Hisloric Poinl of Inleresl in order 10 allow demolition of all buildings and slructures on
the property. - APN: 0209-131-02.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Pioneer, LLC- Paul B. Hofer III
11248 Soulh Turner Avenue
Onlario, CA 91761
5. General Plan Designalion: Induslrial Park
6. Zoning: Induslrial Park, Subarea 6, and Low Residenlial (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The projecl site is 9.65 acres, and conlains several
buildings formerly used for crushing grapes, bulk wine slorage, botlling. and distilling. The
structures were construcled beginning in Ihe early 20th cenlury until the 1940s. Residenlial
development exists directly wesl of the site. North of Ihe projecl sile is zoned Low Densily
Residential as well as Induslrial Park, while soulh of Ihe projecl sile is zoned Induslrial Park as
well as.Generallnduslrial. To the east is also Industrial Park.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address;
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
Lori Shriver, Hisloric Preservalion Planning Aide
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement); None
GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report:
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
FEIR - Final Environmenlallmpact Report
NOx - Nilrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
PMlO - Fine Particulate Maller
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Conlrol Board
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Managemenl District
URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model
9~
Initial Study for:
PIONEER WINERY - DRC2003-01048
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental faclors checked below would be potentially affecled by this projecl, involving at least
one impacI Ihal is a "Potentially Significanl Impact," "Polentially Significanl Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," or "Less Than Significanllmpacl" as indicated by Ihe checklisl on Ihe following pages.
( ) Aesthetics
( ) Biological Resources
( ) Hazards & Hazardous
Malerials
( ) Mineral Resources
( ) Public Services
( ) Utililies/Service Systems
( ) Agricultural Resources
(v") Cultural Resources
( ) Hydrology/Waler Qualily
( ) Energy and Mineral Resources
() Noise
( ) Recreation
( ) Mandalory Findings of Significance
( ) Air Quality
( ) Geology/Soils
( ) Land Use/Planning
( ) Populalion/Housing
( ) Transportation/Traffic
DETERMINATION
On Ihe basis of Ihis inilial evaluation:
( ) I find Ihal Ihe proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effecl on Ihe environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(v') I find that although Ihe proposed project could have a significanl effect on Ihe environmenl, Ihere
will nol be a significanl effecl in Ihis case because revisions in Ihe projecI have been made by, or
agreed 10, by Ihe projecl proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find thaI Ihe proposed projeCI MAY have a significant effecl on Ihe environmenl, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
() I find Ihal the proposed projecl MAY have a "Polentially Significanl ImpacI" or "Polentially
Significanl Unless Miligaled" impacl on Ihe environmenl, bul al leasl one effecl 1) has been
adequalely analyzed in an earlier documenl pursuanllo applicable legal slandard and 2) has been
addressed by miligalion measures based on Ihe earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but il musl analyze only Ihe effecls thaI
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find Ihal although Ihe proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmenl,
because all polentially significant effecls 1) have been analyzed adequalely in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuanl 10 applicable slandards, and 2) have been avoided or
miligaled pursuanl 10 thaI earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed projecl, nOlhing further is required.
Prepared By: ~. ~~ Dale: December 2.2003
Reviewed By: ~~Lf~ Dale: December 2.2003
Rev. 7/22/03
99
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga '
Page 3
Less Than
Significant ,..,
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially W"" Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact IncorPorated Impact Impact
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a subslantial affecl a scenic vista? () () () (,,)
b) Subslanlially damage scenic resources, including, bul () () () (,,)
nollimiled 10, Irees, rock outcroppings, and hisloric
buildings within a Slale Scenic Highway?
c) Substantially degrade Ihe existing visual character or () () () (")
quality of Ihe sile and ~s surroundings?
d) Creale a new source of subslanliallight or glare, () () () (,,)
which would adversely affecl day or nighttime views in
the area?
Comments:
a) There are no significanl vislas wilhin or adjacent to Ihe project s~e. The site is nol within
a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibillll-15.
b) The projecl sile conlains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State
Scenic Highway. There are no Stale Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
c) The sile is localed al Haven Avenue and Humboldl Slreet and is characlerized by
Induslrial Park development 10 Ihe immediale north, soulh, and east. The visual quality of
Ihe area will nol degrade as a result of this project.
d) No addilional Iighling is proposed for this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are
anticipaled.
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (,,)
Farmland of Slalewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on Ihe maps prepared pursuanllo Ihe
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of Ihe
California Resources Agency, 10 non-agricultural use?
b) Conflicl with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (,,)
Williamson Act conlracl?
c) Involve other changes in the exisling environmenl, () () () (,,)
which, due 10 Iheir localion or nalure, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a)
The sile is located al Haven Avenue and Humboldt Streel and Is characterized by
Industrial Park developmenl to Ihe Immediate north, south, and east. There are
approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance w~hin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which aboul one-third is
eilher developed or committed to developmenl according to General Plan Table IV-2. The
major concentrations of designaled farmlands are located in the soulhern and eastern
Rev. 7/22/03
I t;t>
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
less Than
Significant ,..,
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Thso
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact lncomoraled Ifll)act I~ct
portions of our City Ihat is characterized by exisling and planned development. Further,
two-Ihirds of the designaled farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30
acres, and Iheir economic viabilily is doubtful; therefore, Ihey are nol intended 10 be
relained as farmland in Ihe General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR
identified Ihe conversion of farmlands 10 urban uses as a significanl unavoidable adverse
impact for which a stalement of overriding conditions was ultimalely adopled by Ihe C~y
Council. The proposed projecl is consistenl with Ihe General Plan for which Ihe FEIR was
prepared and impacts evalualed.
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land wilhin the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no
Williamson Act conlracts wilhin Ihe Cily.
c) The site is localed al Haven Avenue and Humboldt Slreel and is characlerized by
Induslrial Park development 10 Ihe immediale north, soulh, and east. There is no aclivily
in Ihe vicinily of Ihe site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipaled.
3. AiR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict wilh or obslrucl implementation of the () () () (v")
applicable air qualily plan?
b) Violale any air quality standard or contribute () () () (,.1')
subslantially 10 an existing or projecled air quality
violalion?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (,.1')
any criteria pollulanl for which Ihe projecI region is
non-attainment under an applicable Federal or Slale
ambienl air quality slandard (including reieasing
emissions Ihal exceed quanlilative Ihresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receplors 10 subslantial pollulanl () () () (,.1')
concenlrations?
e) Creale objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (,.1')
number of people?
Comments;
a)
As noted in Ihe General Plan FEIR (Seclion 5,6), conlinued developmenl will conlribule 10
the pollulant levels in Ihe Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and
Stale standards, The General Plan FEIR identified Ihe c~ywide increase in emissions as
a significant unavoidable adverse impacl for which a statemenl of overriding condilions
was ullimalely adopled by Ihe C~y Council. The proposed project is consistent w~h the
General Plan for which Ihe FEIR was prepared and impacts evalualed.
b)
During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty
construction vehicles, conslruclion worker vehicles, and energy use will generale
emissions, In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and
construction activities; however, Ihe scope of the projecl is such Ihal development of the
parking lot for the proposed office will not creale a significant impacI in the immediate area
and Iherefore no m~igation measures are necessary.
Rev. 7/22/03
It;/
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 5
less Than
Significant ''''
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Th",
Significant Mitigation Significant No
tmoact lllCorOomted I"""" lfl'1Jact
e)
c)
As noled in Ihe General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) conlinued developmenl would contribule
10 the pollulanllevels in Ihe Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and
Slale slandards. The General Plan FEIR identified Ihe citywide increase in emissions as
a signiflcanl and adverse impacI for which a Slalemenl of Overriding Considerations was
ullimalely adopled by Ihe City Council. The projecl proposed is consislent wilh the
General Plan for which Ihe FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
d)
Sensilive receplors are defined as populations Ihal are mOte susceptible 10 the effecls of
pollulion Ihan Ihe population at large. The SCAOMD identifies the following as sens~ive
receptors: long-Ierm health care facililies, rehabilitation cenlers, convalescenl cenlers,
reliremenl homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care cenlers, and alhletic
facilities. According 10 Ihe SCAOMD, projecls have Ihe polential 10 create significanl
impacts if Ihey are located within 1/4 mile of sensilive receplors and would emilloxic air
conlaminants idenlified in SCAOMD Rule 1401. According 10 Ihe SCAOMD, projecls
have Ihe polenlial 10 creale significant impacls if Ihey are localed wilhin 1/4 mile of
sensilive receptors and would emit loxic air conlaminanls idenlified in SCAOMD Rule
1401. The project sile is located more Ihan 0.70 miles from Ihe nearesl sensilive
receptor. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipaled.
Typically, Ihe uses proposed do not creale objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are
anlicipated.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a subslantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (.r)
Ihrough habilal modificalions, on any species
identified as a candidale, sensitive, or special stalus
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by Ihe California Departmenl of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a subslanlial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (.r)
or olher sens~ive nalural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by Ihe
California Departmenl of Fish and Game or US Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a subslantial adverse effect on federally () () () (.r)
protected wetlands as defined by Seclion 404 of Ihe
Clean Water Acl (including, but nollimited 10, marsh,
vernal pool, coaslal, elc.) Ihrough direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movemenl of any native () () () (.r)
residenl or migralory fish or wildlife species or wilh
established native residenl or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede Ihe use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Confiict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (.r)
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Rev. 7/22/03
( tJ2.
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
less Than
Significant L."
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Thso
Signilicant Mitigation Significant No
'''''''''' IncorPorated '''''"'' ,~"
f) Conflict wilh the provisions of an adopted Habilal () () () (v')
Conservation Plan, Nalural Community conservalion
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State
habital conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The projecl sile is located in an area developed wilh residential and induslrial uses. The
sile has been previously disrupted during conslruction of infraslruclure and surrounding
developments and annual disking for weed abatement. According to Ihe General Plan
Exhibil IV-3, and Section 5.3 of Ihe General Plan FEIR, Ihe projecI sile is nol within an
area of sensilive biological resources; Iherefore, developmenl will nol adversely affecl rare
or endangered species of planls or animals due to Ihe facl thaI the project is surrounded
by urbanized land uses and is consislent with the General Plan Land Use Plan.
b) The project sile is localed in an urban area wilh no nalural communities. No riparian
habilal exisls on s~e, meaning Ihe project will nol have any impacts.
c) No wetland habital is present on site. As a result, project implemenlation would have no
impact on Ihese resources.
d) The majority of Ihe surrounding area has been or is being developed, Ihereby disrupting
any wildlife corridors Ihal may have exisled, No adverse impacts are anlicipaled.
e) There are no herilage trees on Ihe projecl site; therefore, Ihe proposed project is nol in
conflict wilh any local ordinance.
f) The projecl site is nollocaled within a conservation area according 1.0 Ihe General Plan,
Open Space and Conservalion Plan, ExhibilIV-4. No conflicls wilh habilal conservalion
plans will occur.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a subslantial adverse change in the () (v') () ()
significance of a hislorical resource as defined in
915064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (v') () ()
significance of an archeological resource pursuanllo
9 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (v') () ()
resource or sile or unique geologic fealure?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (v')
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments;
a) There are several winery buildings existing on site near the corner of Haven Avenue and
Humboidl Street. The structures are located at 8812 Haven Avenue.
The buildings at 8812 Haven Avenue are currently designated as a "Potential Locai
Landmark." In June 2003, a Culturai Resources Technical Report was prepared as a
Rev. 7/22/03
/tJ.3
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Imacl IncorPorated Il'Jl}act IlTYlact
supplemenllo Ihe Haven Avenue Grade Separation al SCRRA Railroad Tracks, which
are directly soulh of Ihe subjecl site. The report was prepared by Alex Wesson, Chrisline
Hacking, and Kirslen Erickson of URS. Although Ihe report finds "The Cucamonga
Pioneer Winery Dislricl appears 10 be eligible for lisling in the FRHR under Criteria A." and
".. .also appears 10 be eligible under Crileria Band C," reports from Langston & Associates
Slructural Consultanls, and Thirtielh Slreel Archilecls Inc., indicate Ihe resloration of Ihe
buildings is nol economically and slruclurally feasible. (Drafllnilial Study, URS p. 4-5)
The following mitigation measures are required:
1. The properly owner will place a plaque at the project sile describing the
historical importance of Ihe Pioneer Winery.
2. The properly owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were
connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery
will be conducted. A maximum of $2,500 per interview will be deposited
with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit.
3. The developer building any new development on this property will include
an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be
processed as part of the Development Review Application.
4. Prior to issuance of demolition permils the properly owner will complete
Historical Architectural Building Survey (HABS) Level III documentation or a
similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing buildings
within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level
photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective
corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of
important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs
record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by
drawings or written word. An archival-quality deliverable including written
reports, black and white large-format photographic prints would be
completed. The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy
shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on Ihe project sile;
however, Ihe Rancho Cucamonga area is known 10 have been inhabited by Nalive
Americans according 10 Ihe General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). The Project area is
considered sensitive for hisloric archaeological resources, and Ihe polenlial exisls for
previously unknown cultural resources 10 be found during conslruclion at any localion.
Polentially significanl impacts to archaeological resources will be mitigaled 10 a less Ihan
significanl level Ihrough the implementation of the following general m~igalion measures:
5.
A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction
activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. The
developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with
the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the
archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is
required. The archaeological monitor will conduct on-site cultural
resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If
previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered,
Rev. 7/22/03
/ ()tf
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
Less Than
Significant L""
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
''''''''' Incorporated Irroact lmoact
construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the
emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented.
The archaeological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect
construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery.
6. Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including
initial grading of vegetalion removal), all construction personnel (including
management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and
of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction
personnel shall also be informed of procedures relaling to the discovery of
unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be
cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction
supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that culturai
remains are discovered during the course of construction. The
archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new
construclion personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving
construction activities. The developer will be responsible for notifying the
archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to
work on the project.
7. In Ihe event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately,
and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA
Section 15064.5, shall evaluate Ihe discovery. If the find is evaluated as
significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in
concert with the City.
8. If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving
activities such as grading or Irenchlng, work shall be suspended and the
San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard
guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skelelal
material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code,
Sections 5097.9S et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and
others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are
found in, "A Professional Guide for the Preservation and Protection of
Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods," published
by the California Native American Heritage Commission.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicales Ihal the Rancho Cucamonga area is on
an alluvial fan. According to Ihe San Bernardino County database, no paleontological
sites or resources have been recorded within Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga or Ihe
sphere-of-influence, including Ihe project sile.. Polentially significant impacls 10
paleontological resources will be miligaled 10 a less Ihan significanl level Ihrough Ihe
implemenlation of the following general mitigation measures:
9.
A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity.
The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed
appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The developer will be responsible
for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction
schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if
any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The
Rev. 7/22/03
105
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 9
Less Than
Significant L""
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Th,"
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I pact Incorporated l!!ll.act ImoaCl
paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity
Iraining (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown
subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered, construction work in
the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery
procedures described below will be implemented. The paleontological
monitor will have the aulhority to stop and/or redirect conslruction in the
event of an unanticipated discovery.
10. Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including
initial grading of vegetalion removal), all construction personnel (including
management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the
regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction
personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of
unanticipated paleontological resources (as outlined below). They shall be
caulioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction
supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils
or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The
paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new
construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving
construction activities. The developer will be responsible for notifying the
paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to
work on the project.
11. In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended In the
immediate vicinity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist
shall evaluate the polential significance of the resource. During the
evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as
the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other
resources.
d)
The proposed projecl is in an area Ihal has already been dislurbed by surrounding
development. The projecl sile has already been disrupled by construclion of
infraslruclure and surrounding developmenls and annual disking for weed abalement. No
known religious or sacred siles exisl
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project
a) Expose people or slruclures 10 polenlial substanlial
adverse effecls, including Ihe risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Ruplure of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (.....)
delineated on Ihe mosl recenl Alquisl-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by Ihe
Stale Geologisl for Ihe area or based on olher
substanlial evidence of a known fault? Refer 10
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publicalion 42.
iI) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (.....)
Rev. 7/22/03
Ib~
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10
Less Than
Significant ,..,
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
lmoact IncorPorated Irroact Impact
Hi) Seismic-relaled ground failure, including () () () (....)
Iiquefaclion?
iv) Landslides? () () () (....)
b) Result in subslanlial soil erosion or Ihe loss of lopsoil? () () () (....)
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soillhat is unslable, () () () V)
or Ihal would become unslable as a result of the
projecl, and polentially result in on- or off-sile
landslide, laleral spreading, subsidence, Iiquefaclion
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (....)
18-1-B of Ihe Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substanlial risks 10 life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequalely supporting Ihe use () () () V)
of septic lanks or alternative wastewaler disposal
syslems where sewers are nol available for Ihe
disposal of waslewaler?
d)
Rev. 7/22/03
Comments:
a)
No known faults pass through Ihe site and it is nol in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in
Ihe Rancho Cucamonga City Special Sludy Zone along Ihe Red Hill Fault, according 10 Ihe
General Plan Exhibil V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault,
passes within 2.5 miles north of Ihe site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximalely 5
miles north. These faults are bolh capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also,lhe
San Jacinlo faull, capable of producing up 10 Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 7 miles northeaslerlyof
Ihe site and the San Andreas, capable of up 10 Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 9 miles norlheaslerly
of the sile. Each of Ihese faults can produce slrong ground shaking. Adhering 10 Ihe Uniform
Building Code will ensure Ihal geologic impacls are less Ihan significanl for any fulure
development.
b)
The Rancho Cucamonga area is subjecI 10 slrong Sanla Ana wind condilions during
Seplember to April, which generates blowing sand and dusI, and creates erosion
problems. Construction activilies may temporarily exacerbate Ihe impacts of windblown
sand, resulting in lemporary problems of dusl conlrol; however, developmenl of this
projecl is minor in nalure and will nol result in significanl impacts, or significant erosion.
c)
The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates thaI subsidence is generally associated
wilh large decreases or w~hdrawals of waler from Ihe aquifer. The projecl would nol
withdraw waler from the existing aquifer. The site is nol within a geotechnical hazardous
area or olher unstable geologic un~ or soil type according 10 General Plan FEIR Figure
5.1-2. Soil types ons~e consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand, 30 10 50 percent slopes
according 10 General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5,1-3. No adverse impacls are anticipated.
The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is localed on alluvial soil
deposits, These Iypes of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types onsite
consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand, 30 to 50 percenl slopes according to General Plan
Exhibil V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are characterized by slighl
erosion hazards, and low 10 very low runoff potential. No adverse impacls are anticipaled.
1~7
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
Less Than
Significant l,,.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With ThM
Significant Mitigation Significant No
lmoact IncorPorated Impact I oct
e) The project will connect 10, and be served by, the exisling local sewer syslem for
waslewater disposal. No seplic tanks or alte~native waslewaler disposal is proposed.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significanl hazard to Ihe public or Ihe () () () (,.1')
environmenl through Ihe routine Iransport, use, or
disposal of hazardous maleria/s?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or Ihe () () () (,.1')
environmenl through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accidenl condilions involving Ihe release of
hazardous malerials inlo the environment?
c) Emil hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (,.1')
acutely hazardous malerials, subslances, or waste
within 1/4 mile of an exisling or proposed school?
d) Be localed on a site which is included on a Iisl of () () () (,.1')
hazardous malerials sites compiled pursuant 10
Governmenl Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it creale a significant hazard 10 the public or Ihe
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (,.1')
where such a plan has nol been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would Ihe
projecl result in a safely hazard for people residing or
working in Ihe project area?
f) For a projecI wilhin Ihe vicinily of a private airslrip, () () () (,.1')
would Ihe projecl result in a safely hazard for people
residing or working in the projecl area?
g) Impair implementalion of or physically interfere w~h an () () () (,.1')
adopled emergency response plan or emergency
evacualion plan?
h) Expose people or slructures to a significant risk of () () () (,.1')
loss, injury or dealh involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacenllo urbanized areas or
where residences are inlermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a)
The project will nol involve Ihe transport, use, or disposal of hazardous malerials. The
City participates in a counlywide interagency coalition Ihal is considered a full service
Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in Ihe stale. The
City has adopled a Slandardized Emergency Managemenl System Multi-Hazard
Functional Plan 10 respond 10 chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, Slate,
and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous male rials and/or
wasle will reduce Ihe potential for significanl impacts to a level less than significant. No
adverse impacls are expected.
b)
The proposed projecl does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels.
The City participales in a countywide interagency coalilion Ihal is considered a full service
Rev, 7/22/03
Ib~
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
Less Than
Significant L...
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Thon
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Ifrpact Inco orated IITDact I~ct
h)
Hazardous Malerials Division Ihal is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The
C~y has adopled a Slandardized Emergency Managemenl System Multi-Hazard
Funclional Plan 10 respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance wilh Federal, Slale,
and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous malerials
including asbeslos will reduce the potential for significanl impacts 10 a level less Ihan
significant. No adverse impacls are anlicipated.
c)
There are no schools localed within 1/4 mile of Ihe project site. The project site is localed
w~hin 0.70 miles of Ihe nearest existing school. No impacts are anticipaled.
d)
The proposed projecl is not lisled as a hazardous wasle or subslance malerials site.
Recenl site inspection did nol reveallhe presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping
of hazardous malerials. No impact is anticipaled.
e)
The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is nol within 2 miles of a public
airport. Projecl site is located approximalely 3 miles northerly of Ihe Onlario Airport and is
offset north of Ihe fIIghl palh. No impact is anlicipaled.
f)
The nearesl privale airslrip, Cable Airport, is localed approximalely 21/2 miles to Ihe west
of the City's weslerly Iimils. No impacI is anticipaled.
g)
The Cily's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updaled every two years, includes policies
and procedures 10 be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Districl in the event of
a disasler. Because the projecl includes alleasl two poinls of public streel access and is
required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no
adverse impacts are anticipated.
Rancho Cucamonga faces Ihe grealesl ongoing Ihreal from a wind-driven fire in the Urban
Wildland Interface area found in Ihe northern part of Ihe City according 10 Ihe Fire Dislrict
Slrategic Plan 2000-2005; however, Ihe proposed projecI sile is nollocaled within a high
fire hazard area according 10 General Plan Exhib~ V-7.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any waler quality standards or wasle discharge () () () (Y"')
requiremenls?
b) Subslantially deplele groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (Y")
subslantially with groundwater recharge such Ihal
Ihere would be a nel deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of Ihe local groundwaler table level (e.g., Ihe
produclion rale of pre-existing nearby wells would
drop to a level which would nol support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)? ,
c) Subslantially alter the existing drainage pattern of Ihe () () () (Y"')
site or area, including Ihrough the alteration of Ihe
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in subslantial erosion or siltalion on- or off-s~e?
Rev. 7/22/03
Ib9
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 13
Less Than
Significant ,,,'
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Irmaet Inco'DOrated Irmact Irmact
d) Substanlially alter Ihe exisling drainage pattern of Ihe () () () (.....)
sile or area, including Ihrough Ihe alteralion of the
course of a slream or river, or subslanlially increase
Ihe rate or amounl of surface runoff in a manner,
which would result in flooding on- or off-sile?
e) Creale or conlribule runoff water which would exceed () () () (.....)
Ihe capacily of exisling or planned stormwaler
drainage syslems or provide subslanlial addilional
sources of polluled runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water qualily? () () () (.....)
g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as () () () V)
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place wilhin a 1 DO-year flood hazard area slructures () () () V)
Ihal would impede or redirecl flood flows?
i) Expose people or slruclures 10 a significanl risk of () () () V)
loss, injury or dealh involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundalion by seiche, Isunami, or mudflow? () () () (.....)
d)
Rev. 7/22/03
Comments:
a)
Waler and sewer service is provided by Ihe Cucamonga County Waler Oislrict (CCWO)
and will not affecl waler qualily slandards or wasle discharge requiremenls. Project is
designed to connecllo existing waler and sewer syslems.
b)
According 10 CCWO, 43 percent of Ihe City's waler is currently provided from ground water
in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWO has adopted a masler plan Ihal eslimales
demand needs until Ihe year 2030. The proposed projecl will not deplele groundwaler
supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because il is nol wilhin an area designated as a
recharge basin or spreading ground according 10 General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The
developmenl of Ihe site will require the grading of Ihe site and excavation; however, would
not affect Ihe existing aquifer, eslimaled 10 be aboul 288 10 470 feet below Ihe ground
surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Seclion 5.9), continued developmenl
citywide will increase water needs and is a significanl impact; however, CCWO has plans
to meel this increased need through the conslruction of future waler facililies.
c)
The projecl will cause minimal changes in absorplion rates, drainage patterns, and Ihe
rate and amounl of surface water runoff due 10 the reduclion of buildings on the sile;
however, the projecl will nol alter Ihe course of any slream or river. All runoff will be
conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows.
A grading and drainage plan must be approved by Ihe Building Official and City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, Ihe projecl will not result in subslanlial
erosion or siltation on- or off-sile. No impacts are anlicipaled.
The projecl will cause minimal changes in absorption rales, drainage patterns, and the
rate and amount of surface waler runoff due to Ihe reduclion of buildings on Ihe s~e;
however, the projecl will nol alter Ihe course of any slream or river. All runoff will be
II/)
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 14
Less Than
Significant ,..,
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Thao
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I=act IncorOOrated Impact lmoact
j)
conveyed 10 existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle Ihe flows.
A grading and drainage plan musl be approved by Ihe Building Official and Cily Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permils. Therefore, Ihe projecl will nol result in subslantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-sileo No impacls are anticipaled.
e)
The projecl will cause minimal changes in absorplion rales, drainage patterns, and the
rale and amounl of surface waler runoff due to the reduclion of buildings on Ihe sile;
however, Ihe project will nol alter Ihe course of any slream or river. All runoff will be
conveyed 10 existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handie Ihe flows.
A grading and drainage plan musl be approved by Ihe Building Official and City Engineer
prior 10 issuance of grading permils. Therefore, the projecl will nol result in subslantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
f)
Grading aclivities associaled with Ihe conslruction period would result in minimal
increases in the amounl of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrenl slorm
evenl, Ihus resulting in minimal surface waler qualily impacls. The sile is grealer Ihan 1
acre; Iherefore, is required to comply with Ihe Nalional Pollutant Discharge Eliminalion
Syslem (NPDES) to minimize waler pollution. No impacls are anlicipated.
g)
h)
No housing unils are proposed with Ihis project. No adverse impacts are expected.
The projecI sile is not located within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area according 10 General
Plan Exhib~ V-5. No adverse impacls are expected.
i)
The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protecled by an exlensive storm drain system
designed to convey a 1 DO-year slorm event. The syslem is substanliaily improved and
provides an inlegrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This exisling
syslem includes several debris dams and levees north of Ihe City, spreading grounds,
concrele-Iined channels, and underground slorm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibil
V-5. The projecI sile is nol localed wilhin a 1 DO-year flood hazard area according 10
General Plan Exhibil V-5. No adverse impacls are expected.
There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near Ihe projecl site; Iherefore impacts from
seiche and Isunami are nol anlicipaled. The Rancho Cucamonga area sils atlhe base of
Ihe sleep easlern San Gabriel Mounlains whose deep canyons were cut by mounlain
slreams, Numerous man-made conlrols have been constructed 10 reduce Ihe mudflow
impacts 10 the level of non-significance within Ihe City. This exisling syslem includes
several debris dams and levees north of Ihe City, and spreading grounds bolh wilhin and
north of Ihe City.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established commun~y? () () () (,/')
b) Conflicl with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (,/')
regulalion of an agency wilh jurisdiction over the
project (including, but notlimiled to, a general plan,
specific plan, local coaslal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for Ihe purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environ menIal effecl?
Rev. 7/22/03
/1/
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 15
Less Than
Significant ,...
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wrth Th",
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Irmact IncorOOraled In""", I~"",
c) Conflicl with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (,f)
or nalural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The sile is localed at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characlerized by
Industrial Park development to Ihe immediale north, soulh, and east. This projecl
conlains no conslruclion of new buildings. No adverse impacls are anticipaled.
b) The project site land use designation is Induslrial Park. The proposed projecl is
consislenl with Ihe General Plan and does not inlerfere wilh any policies for environ menIal
protection. As such, no impacts are anticipaled.
c) The project sile is nol localed within any habilal conservalion or nalural communily plan
area, According 10 Ihe General Plan Exhibil IV-3, and Section 5.3 of Ihe General Plan
FEIR, Ihe projecI s~e is nol w~hin an area of sensitive biological resources; Iherefore,
developmenl will nol adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due
to the facllhallhe projecl is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consislent wilh Ihe
General Plan Land Use Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availabilily of a known mineral () () () (,f)
resource thaI would be of value 10 the region and Ihe
residents of Ihe Stale?
b) Result in Ihe loss of availability of a locally importanl () () () (,f)
mineral resource recovery sile delinealed on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a)
The s~e is nol designaled as a State Aggregate Resources Area according 10 Ihe C~y
General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; Iherefore,lhere is no impact.
b)
The site is nol designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable
mineral resource recovery sile; Iherefore, Ihere is no impact.
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (,f)
excess of standards established in Ihe local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons 10 or generation of excessive () () () (,f)
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) A subslanlial permanenl increase in ambienl noise () () () (,f)
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A subslantiallemporary or periodic increase in () () () (,f)
ambient noise levels in the projecl vicinity above levels
existing withoul the project?
Rev. 7/22/03
/f2.
.
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 16
Less Than
Significant le$,
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Th,"
5ignlficant Mitigation Significant No
lmoact Incorporated Iimact lmoact
e) For a project localed within an airport land use plan or, () () () (,r)
where such a plan has nol been adopled, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would Ihe
projecl expose people residing or working in Ihe
project area 10 excessive noise levels?
f) For a projecl within Ihe vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (v")
would Ihe project expose people residing or working in
Ihe project area 10 excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) The projecl sile is within an area of noise levels exceeding City slandards according 10
General Plan Exhibil V-13 al build-out. In addition, Ihe General Plan FEIR (Seclion 5.7)
indicales Ihat during a conslruclion phase, on-site slationary sources, heavy-duly
construction vehicles, and conslruction equipmenl, will generale noise exceeding C~y
slandards, however Ihe level of construclion required for the proposed projecl is limited 10
minor site improvemenl and will not result in significant impacls to neighboring properties.
b) The uses associated wilh Ihis Iype of projecl normally do nol induce ground borne
vibralions. As such, no impacls are anticipated.
c) The primary source of ambienl noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is Iraffic. The
proposed aclivities will nol significantly increase Iraffic; hence, are not anticipated to
increase Ihe ambient noise levels wilhin the vicinity of the project.
d) See a) response above.
e) The site is nollocaled w~hin an airport land use plan and is not wilhin 2 miles of a public
airport. Localed approximalely 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north
of Ihe f1ighl palh. No impacI is anticipaled.
f) The nearesl privale airslrip, Cable Airport, is localed approximalely 21/2 miles to Ihe west
of Ihe City's weslerly limits. No impacl is anlicipaled.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce subslantial population growth in an area, either () () () (,r)
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, Ihrough
exlension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace subslanlial numbers of existing housing, () () () (v')
necessitating the construction of replacemenl housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace subslantial numbers of people, necess~aling () () () (v")
Ihe conslruction of replacemenl housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a)
The project is localed in a predominantly developed area and will nol induce population
growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will nol attracl new
employees to the area. No impacls are anticipaled.
Rev. 7/22/03
1/3
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 17
Less Than
Significant L.,.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With ThM
Significant Mitigation Significant No
j"/npact Incorporated ,;,.""", Impact
b) The projecI site contains no exisling housing unils. No adverse impacI expected.
c) The project site is vacanlland. No impacls are anticipaled.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? () () () (,1')
b) Police proleclion? () () () (,1')
c) Schools? () () () (,1')
d) Parks? () () () (,1')
e) Olher public facililies? () () () (,1')
e)
Rev. 7/22/03
Comments:
a)
The sile, located al Haven Avenue and Humboldl Slreel and is characlerized by Induslrial
Park developmenl 10 Ihe immediate north, soulh, and easl, would be served by a fire
slalion localed approximalely 1 mile from Ihe projecl sile. The projecl will not require Ihe
construclion of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in
Ihe levels of service, which could cause Ihe need 10 conslruct new facililies. Standard
conditions of approval from Ihe Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the
projecl so no impacls 10 fire services will occur. No impacls are anlicipaled.
b)
Additional police prolection is not required as Ihe addilion of Ihe projecl will nol change
the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will nol have a subslanlial increase in
property to be palrolled as Ihe project sile is within an area thaI is regularly patrolled.
c)
The site is in a developed area currently served by Ihe Cucamonga School Districl and
Ihe Chaffey Joinl Union High School District. The projecl will not be required to pay
school fees as prescribed by Slale law because Ihere will be no increase in Ihe ex,isling
building area and no impacts are anlicipaled,
d)
The site is in a developed area, currently served by Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park is located 1 mile from the projecl site. The projecl will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any exisling facilities or cause a decline in
Ihe levels of service, which could cause the need 10 conslrucl new facililies. No impacls
are anlicipaled.
The proposed projecl will ulilize existing public facililies. The sile is in a developed area,
currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require Ihe
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facililies or cause a decline in
the levels of service, which could cause the need 10 conslrucl new facililies. Cumulalive
developmenl within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services.
According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projecled increase in library
space under Ihe General Plan will nol meel the projecled demand, The General Plan
/ft{
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 18
Less Than
Significant L'M
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Th",
Significant Mitigation Significant No
lmoacl IncorOoraled IfTllact Irroact
FEIR idenlified Ihe cumulative impacl on library services as a significant unavoidable
adverse impacl for which a Statemenl of Overriding Consideralions was ullimalely
adopted by the City Council. The proposed projecl is consistenl with the General Plan for
which Ihe EIR was prepared and impacts evalualed. Since the adoption of Ihe General
Plan, Ihe City has planned a new library within Ihe Victoria Gardens regional shopping
cenler of approximalely 22,000 square feel, which is in excess of Ihe projecled need of
15,500 square feel al build-oul of the City.
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase Ihe use of existing neighborhood and () () () (....)
regional parks or other recreational facililies such thaI
subslantial physical delerioration of Ihe facility would
occur or be acceleraled?
b) Does Ihe projecl include recreational facilities or () () () (,()
require the conslruclion or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical effecl
on Ihe environmenl?
Comments:
a)
The sile is in a developed area, currently served by Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park is located 1 mile from Ihe projecl sile. This projecl is nol proposing any new
housing or large employment generalor Ihal would cause an increase in Ihe use of parks
or other recreational facililies. No impacls are anticipaled.
b)
See a) response above.
15. TRANSPORT ATIONlTRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in Iraffic, which is subslanlial in () () () (....)
relation 10 the exisling traffic load and capacity of Ihe
street syslem (Le., result in a subslantial increase in
either Ihe number of vehicle Irips, Ihe volume to
capacily ratio on roads, or congeslion al
intersections) ?
b) Exceed, eilher individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (....)
service standard established by Ihe county congeslion
management agency for designaled roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (....)
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location thaI results in subslantial safety risks?
d) Subslantially increase hazards due 10 a design fealure () () () (....)
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous inlersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequale emergency access? () () () (....)
f) Result in inadequale parking capacity? () () () (....)
Rev. 7/22/03
//5
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 19
Less Than
Significant l"s
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Thon
Significant Mitigation Significant No
'n,,,," Incorporalec! IITDact lmoac!
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (......)
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
lurnouls, bicycle racks)?
e)
f)
g)
Comments:
a)
As noled in Ihe General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), conlinued developmenl will contribule 10
Ihe Iraffic load in Ihe Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consislenl wilh
Ihe General Plan for which Ihe FEIR was prepared and impacts evalualed. The projecl is
in an area Ihat is mostly developed with slreet improvements existing. The projecl will not
creale a subslantial increase in Ihe number of vehicle Irips, Iraffic volume or congeslion al
inlersections. The projecl site will be required to provide streel improvements (curb,
gutter and sidewalk) along the slreet fronlage of Ihe site per Cily roadway slandards, as
applicable. No impacls are anticipaled.
b)
The projecl will generate no additional Irips as no conslruction will be occurring. No'
impacts are anticipaled.
c)
Localed approximalely 3 miles northerly of Ihe Ontario Airport, the s~e is offsel north of
the flight palh and will not change air Iraffic patterns. No impacls are anlicipated.
d)
The project is in an area Ihal is mostly developed. The projecl will be required 10 provide
streel improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along Ihe slreel fronlage of the sile, as
applicable. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous
intersections or farming uses. The projecl will, Iherefore, nol creale a subslantial increase
in hazards due 10 a design fealure. No impacls are anticipated.
The projecl will be designed 10 provide access for all emergency vehicles and will
therefore nol create an inadequale emergency access. No impacls are anticipated.
The project does nol require parking and willlherefore not creale an inadequale parking
capacity. No impacts are anlicipaled.
The project is non-conslruction in nalure and Iherefore will nol impacllransportalion.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed waslewaler Ireatmenl requiremenls of the () () () (,,1')
applicable Regional Waler Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the conslruction of new water or () () () (......)
waslewater Irealmenl facililies or expansion of existing
facilities, Ihe conslruclion of which could cause
significant environmental effecls?
c) Require or resuit in the construction of new slorm () () () (......)
water drainage facilities or expansion of exisling
facilities, Ihe conslruction of which could cause
significant environmenlal effects.?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available 10 serve the () () () (......)
project from existing entitlemenls and resources, or
are new or expanded ent~lements needed?
Rev. 7/22/03
/I~
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 20
less Than
Significant loss
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially With Thao
Significant Mitigation Significant No
,....." Incorporated lmoact ~ct
e) Result in a delermination by Ihe waslewater Irealmenl () () () (v")
provider, which serves or may serve the project, Ihal it
has adequale capacity to serve Ihe project's projecled
demand in addition to Ihe provider's exisling
commilmenls?
f) Be served by a landfill wilh sufficienl permitted () () () (-')
capacity to accommodate Ihe project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply w~h Federal, Slale, and local slalules and () () () (-')
regulations related 10 solid wasle?
f)
g)
Rev. 7/22/03
Comments:
a)
The proposed project is served by Ihe Cucamonga Counly Waler Dislricl sewer system,
which has wasle Ireated by Ihe Inland Empire Ulilities Agency at the RP-4 Irealment planl
located wilhin Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required 10 meellhe requiremenls of
Ihe Sanla Ana Regional Waler Qualily Conlrol Board regarding waslewaler. No impacls
are anlicipaled.
b)
The proposed project is served by Ihe Cucamonga Counly Water Dislricl sewer system,
which has waste treated by Ihe Inland Empire Ulilities Agency allhe RP-4 Irealment plant
located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 localed within C~y of Onlario, neilher of
which are al capacity. The project is required to meet the requiremenls of Ihe Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding waslewater. No impacls are anlicipaled.
c)
All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed 10
handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan musl be approved by Ihe Building Official
and City Engineer prior 10 issuance of grading permils. The impact is nol considered
significant.
d)
The projecl is served by Ihe Cucamonga Counly Waler Dislricl water syslem. There is
currently a sufficienl water supply available 10 Ihe Cily of Rancho Cucamonga to serve
this project. No impacls are anticipaled. ,
e)
The proposed projecl is served by Ihe Cucamonga County Water Dislrict sewer syslem,
which has waste Ireated by Ihe Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 Irealmenl planl
localed within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 localed w~hin Cilyof Onlario, neither of
which are at capacity. No impacts are anlicipaled.
Solid waste disposal will be provided by Ihe currenl Cily contracled hauler who disposes
Ihe refuse at a permitted landfill w~h sufficienl capac~y to handle the Cily's solid wasle
disposal needs.
This projecl complies with Federal, Slale, and local slatutes and regulations regarding
solid wasle. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues 10 implemenl wasle reduction
procedures consistent w~h AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
/(7
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 21
Less Th""
Significant ,..,
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially W"" Tha,
Significant ~'::~on Significant No
";"'act Inco rated ""'act '''''act
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the projecl have the polential to degrade Ihe () () () (.....)
quality of the environmenl, subslanlially reduce the
habilal of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife populalion to drop below self-suslaining levels,
Ihrealen to eliminate a plant or animal communily,
reduce Ihe number or reslricllhe range of a rare or
endangered planl or animal, or eliminale important
examples of the major periods of California hislory or
prehislory?
b) Does the projecl have impacls Ihat are individually () () () (.....)
limiled, but cumulalively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that Ihe incremenlal effecls of a
project are considerable when viewed in conneclion
with Ihe effecls of pasl projects, Ihe effecls of olher
currenl projecls, and Ihe effecls of probable fulure
projecls)?
c) Does the project have environmental effecls thaI will () () () (,f)
cause substanlial adverse effecls on human beings,
eilher directly or indirectly?
c)
Rev. 7/22/03
Comments:
a)
The site is not located in an area of sensilive biological resources as identified on Ihe Cily
of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhib~ IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding Ihe
sile is developed. Based on previous development and slreel improvements, il is unlikely
that any endangered or rare species would inhabillhe sile.
b)
If Ihe proposed projecl were approved, then Ihe applicanl would be required 10 develop
Ihe s~e in accordance with the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001
General Plan was adopled along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of
Fact, and a Slalemenl of Overriding Considerations for significanl adverse environmental
effecls of build-out in Ihe Cily and Sphere of Influence. The Cily made findings Ihal
adoption of Ihe General Plan would result in significanl adverse effecls 10 aggregale
resources, prime farmland, air qualily, the acouslical environmenl, library services, and
aeslhelics and visual resources. M~igalion measures were adopled for each of Ihese
resources; however, Ihey would nol reduce impacts 10 less Ihan significanl levels. As
such, the Cily adopled a Stalemenl of Overriding Considerations balancing Ihe benefils of
developmenl under Ihe General Plan Updale against Ihe significant unavoidable adverse
impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefils include less
overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projecls thaI will be pedestrian friendly
and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and Ihe Slalement
of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evalualion of cumulalive impacts is
required.
The proposed demolition of existing slructures would nol cause subslanlial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Additionally, impacts resulting from
air qual~y would be short-term and would cease once conslruclion activilies were
compleled.
/(~
--
Initial Study for
DRC2003-01 048 - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 22
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuanllo the tiering, program EIR, or olher CEQA process, one
or more effecls have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negalive Declaralion per Section
15063{c)(3)(D). The effects idenlified above for this projecl were wilhin the scope of and adequalely
analyzed in the following earlier documenl(s) pursuanl tei applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by miligalion measures based on Ihe earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing Ihis Initial Study and are available for review in Ihe Cily of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all thaI apply):
V)
General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061 027, Certified Oclober 17, 2001)
V)
Master Environmental Assessmenl for Ihe 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) ,
(1')
Induslrial Area Specific Plan EIR
(Certified Seplember 19,1981)
Rev. 7/22/03
IIq
Dee 22 03 03:35p
Hofer Ranch
9093904567
In~ial Sludy for
DRC2003.0104e - PIONEER WINERY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 23
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certijy thai I am the applicant lor the proJflCt described In this In~lal Study, I acknowledge thaI I have
read this Initial Study aM the proposed mlligatlon measul"$s. Further. I have levis&d the prole"t plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed m~lgalion measures 10 avoid the effects or ,,"li~gate the
effects 10 a point where c 0 sign/fican Ironmenlal effects would occur.
Applicant's Si9natt:::. . ~t 2- - c9-~ ~- 0~
,....
Print Name and nle: -
-,--.-..
i;\pIanning\linel\plngcomm\envdoC\drc2003-01048 I.s.rev.doc
Rev, 7122103
p.2
120
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Historic Poinl of Inlerest DRC2003-01048
Public Review Period Closes: January 28, 2004
Project Name:
Project Applicant: Pioneer, LLC - Paul Hofer III
Project Location (also see attached map): Localed al8812 Haven Avenue - APN: 0209-131-02
Project Description: A request 10 designale Ihe Pioneer Winery as a Hisloric Poinl of Inlerest in order 10
allow demolition of all buildings and slruclures on Ihe property.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
o The Initial Study shows thatlhere is no subslantial evidence Ihallhe projecl may have a significanl
effecl on Ihe environment.
181 The Initial Sludy identified polentially significanl effects but:
(1) Revisions in Ihe projecl plans or proposals made or agreed 10 by the applicanl before this
proposed Negalive Declaralion was released for public review would avoid Ihe effecls or
mitigate the effecls 10 a poinl where clearly no significanl effecls would occur, and
(2) There is no subslantial evidence before Ihe agency Ihatthe project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in Ihe attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for reviewal the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 4n-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
February 18. 2004
Date of Delermination
Adopted By
/21
--
RESOLUTION NO. '()i/- 02 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE
CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERY A HISTORIC POINT OF
INTEREST, LOCATED AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-131-02.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an applicalion for Point of Interest Designation
DRC2003-01048 as described in the tille of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Poinl of Interest is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 28, 2004, Ihe Historic Preservation Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing and recommended approval of Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048.
3. On February 18, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
meeting and approved Point of Interesl Designalion DRC2003-01048.
4. All legal prerequisites 10 the adoption of this Resolution have OCCurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, delermined, and resolved by Ihe City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of Ihe facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A,"
of this Resolulion are Irue and correct.
2. The application applies to approximalely 9.65 acres of land, basically a reclangular
configuralion, localed at 8812 Haven Avenue.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including minules of the
public hearing by the Historic Preservation Commission on January 28,2004, written and oral staft
reports, logether with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facls:
a. Hislorical and Cultural Significance:
Findina 1; The proposed Poinl of Interest is particularly representative of an
historical period, type, style, region, or way of life,
Fact/s: The winery represents Ihe agricultural period of the Cucamonga
region, and relates to Ihe livelihood of many residents.
Findina 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected wilh someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The winery was owned alone lime by Garrett and Company, one of
Cucamonga's prominent wineries. The cooperative involved several
J Zz.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004
Page 2
significant families within the Cucamonga region, including Ihe
Thomases, DeBerards, Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers. '
Findina 3: The proposed Point of Interesl is connected with a business or use,
which was once common bul is now rare.
FacVs: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were
nol necessary, as demand for sweel wines declined and Ihe region
began to be subdivided by developers.
FacVs: The cooperative was Ihe firsl in Cucamonga that independently
owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this
accomplishment.
4. Based upon the facts and informalion contained in the proposed Mitigaled Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment/or
the application, the city Council finds Ihat there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a
significant effect upon the environmenl and adopts a Mitigaled Negative Declaralion and Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as
follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgaled thereunder; Ihat said Miligaled Negalive Declaration and Ihe Initial Study prepared
Iherefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the informalion conlained in said Mitigated Negalive Declaralion wilh
regard 10 Ihe application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmenlal effects that will result if Ihe projecl is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. , Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering Ihe record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Miligated Negative Declaralion for the project, Ihere is no evidence thallhe proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impacl upon wildlife resources or the habital upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence conlained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the slaff reports and exhibits, and Ihe information provided 10 the City Council during
the meeting, Ihe City Council hereby rebuls the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section
753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon Ihe findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby resolves that pursuanl 10 Chapler 2.24.080, Seclion C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Hisloric Point of Interest" designalion is merely recognilion for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designalions, the City Council of Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Hisloric Poinl of
Inlerest DRC2003-01048 conlingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures:
/23
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004
Page 3
Environmental Mitiqation
Cultural Resources
1 ) The property owner will place a plaque al the project site describing the
hislorical importance of the Pioneer Winery.
2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that
were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga
Pioneer Winery. A maximum of $2,500 per inlerview will be deposited
with Ihe City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolilion permit.
3) The developer building any new development on Ihis property will
include an interprelive art and architectural component. This
component shall be processed as part of Ihe Development Review
Application.
4) Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property owner will complete
Historical Architectural Building Survey (HABS) Level III documentation
or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing
buildings wilhin the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Dislrict. An
experienced HABS level pholographer will use large-format cameras to
produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall
views and delails of importanl eX1erior and interior features of each
structure. The photographs record texlures, delails, and spatial
relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. -An
archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white
large-format photographic prints would be completed. The original
documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited
wilh the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
5) A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction
activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis.
The developer will be responsible for providing Ihe archaeological
monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and
for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground
dislurbing activity is required. The archaeological monitor will conduct
on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as
oullined below. If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are
uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted
and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be
implemented. The archaeological monitor will have the authority 10
stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated
discovery.
6) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including
inilial grading of vegetation removal), all conslruction personnel
(including managemenl) shall be informed of Ihe cultural resource
values involved and of the regulalory prolections afforded those
resources. The conslruction personnel shall also be informed of
/2.'1
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004
Page 4
procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipaled cultural resources
(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned nollo collecl artifacts,
and asked to inform a construclion supervisor and the onsite
archaeological monilor in Ihe event that cullural remains are
discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological
monilor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new conslruclion
personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving conslruction
activilies. The developer will be responsible for nolifying Ihe
arc~aeological monitor when new construclion personnel are
scheduled to work on the project.
7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped
immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant 10 the procedures
sel forth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the
find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further miligation
measures will be developed in concert with the City.
8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth
moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be
suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be
notified. Slandard guidelines set by California law provides for the
treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California
Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 el seq.; Health and Safety
Code, Section 7050.5 and olhers). Procedures to be employed in the
treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide for the
Preservation and Prolection of Native American Human Remains and
Associated Grave Goods," published by the California Native American
Heritage Commission.
9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construclion
activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as
deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The developer will
be responsible for providing Ihe archaeological monilor with the current
construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the
archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is
required. The paleontological monilor will conduct on-site cultural
resources sensitivity training (crew educalion) as outlined below. If
previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are
uncovered, conslruction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted
and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be
implemenled. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to
stop and/or redirect conslruction in the event of an unanlicipated
discovery.
10) Prior to Ihe beginning of earth moving construction activities (including
initial grading of vegetalion removal), all conslruction personnel
(including managemenl) shall be informed of the paleonlological
resources and of the regulalory protections afforded those resources.
The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures
/25
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2003-01 048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FEBRUARY 18, 2004
Page 5
relating to the discovery of unanticipaled paleontological resources (as
oUllined below). They shall be caulioned not to collect fossils, and
asked to inform a conslruction supervisor and the onsile
paleontological monitor in the evenl thaI fossils or mineralized bones
are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological
monitor shall administer supplemenlal briefings to all new construclion
personnel, prior to Iheir commencement of earth moving construction
activities. The developer will be responsible for notifying Ihe
paleontological monilor when new construction personnel are
scheduled to work on the project.
11) In Ihe event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation
activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the
immediate vicinity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist
shall evaluate Ihe potenlial significance of the resource. During the
evalualion period, work can be redirecled 10 nearby locations, as long
as the paleontologist has determined Ihat there is no potential to
impact other resources.
6. The Mayor shall certify 10 the adoption of Ihis Resolution.
12~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure thaI adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of Ihe Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1 . Conditions of approvallhat act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the aclion
and Ihe procedure necessary 10 ensure compliance. The miligation measure conditions of
approval are conlained in the adopled Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary.' This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place Ihrough all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relale to that department.
Procedures - The following sleps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consullanls' fees, incurred by Ihe City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each pOlentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigalion measure identified in the Miligalion Monitoring Checklisl, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take aClion, what action will be laken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documenlation will be kepI in the project file with the department having Ihe original aulhority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
/27
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
3. Appropriale specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City slaft's is needed,
as determined by the projecl planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation aclivities and provide appropriate written approvals to Ihe project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each aclion ilem that was idenlified on Ihe MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further aclion is required for Ihe specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further moniloring will be signed oft
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring Ihe refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or addilions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the projecl planner or responsible City
departmenl and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The projecl planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop Ihe work of
construction contraclors if compliance wilh any aspecls of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has Ihe
authority to hold issuance of a business license unlil all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require
the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These
funds shall be used by Ihe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staft time to monitor
and report on the mitigation measure for the required periOd of time.
9. In Ihose instances requiring long-term project moniloring, the applicanl shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall idenlify Ihe reporter as an individual qualified to
know whether the particular miligation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Developmenl Direclor or City Planner prior to Ihe issuance of building permits.
I Z~
I)
(INITIAL STUDY PART
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST
Paul B. Hofer
Applicant:
Date:
DRC2003-01048
Project File No.
nitial
December 2. 2003
Shriver
Lori
StUdy Prepared by:
3
4/7
A
D
Review of
concept male rial
for plaque
Review of
o
CP
The property owner will place a plaque althe projecl sile
describing Ihe hislorical importance of Ihe Pioneer
Winery.
report
B
CP
The property owner will conduct two oral histories for
individuals Ihat were connecled wilh Ihe operation or
history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum
of $2,500 per inlerview will be deposited wilh Ihe City
Planning Division prior 10 issuance of a demolilion
permit.
4/7
D/C
Review of
concepl plans
B/C
CP
The developer buiiding any new developmenl on Ihis
property will include an inlerprelive art and architeclural
component. This componenl shall be processed as part
of Ihe Developmenl Review Applicalion.
I
4/7
D
plans
Review of
of 4
B
1
CP
Prior 10 issuance of demolition permits the property
owner will complete Hislorical Architeclural Buiiding
Survey (HABS) Level I II documenlalion or a similar level
of documentation for each of the six conlribuling
buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District.
An experienced HABS level pholographer will use large-
formal cameras to produce perspeclive corrected,
black-and-while photographs of overall views and delaiis
of important exterior and inlerior fealures of each
slructure. The photographs record textures, delails, and
spatial relalionships nol easiiy conveyed by drawings or
written word. An archival-quaiily deliverable including
written reports, black and while large-format
photographic prinls, and measured drawings, would be
completed. The original documenls and one single
sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with Ihe
Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center.
-
N
-t>
4/7
4/7
Prior to on-site 0
aclivilies
Prior 10 D
conslruclion
activ~ies
B
CP/BO
A profesSional archaeologisl will m lor earth moving
construction aclivily. The monilonng will be on an
intermittent, spot-check basis. The developer will be
responsible for providing Ihe archaeological monitor with
the current construction schedule on a regular basis,
and for notifying Ihe archaeological monilor if any
unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The
archaeological monilor will conduct on-site cullural
resources sensitivity training (crew eduCalion) as
outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface
cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in
the immediate vicinily will be halted and Ihe emergency
discovery procedures described. below will be
implemented. The archaeological monitor will have Ihe
aulhorily to slop and/or redirecl conslruction in Ihe evenl
of an unanlicipated discovery.
B
2 of 4
CP/BO
Prior to the beginning of earth moving construclion
activities (including inilial grading of vegetation removal),
all construclion personnel (including managemenl) shall
be informed of the cultural resource values involved and
of the regulatory protections afforded Ihose resources.
The conslruction personnel shall also be informed of
procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipaled
cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be
cautioned not to coli eel artifacts, and asked 10 inform a
conslruclion supervisor and Ihe on-site archaeological
monitor in the event thaI cultural remains are discovered
during Ihe course of conslruclion. The archaeological
monilor shall administer supplemenlal briefings 10 all
new conslruclion personnel, prior 10 their
commencement of earth moving construction acliviles.
The developer will be responsible for nOlifying Ihe
archaeological monitor when new conslruction
personnel are scheduled 10 work on Ihe project.
-
tJ.,)
D
4(1
D
4(1
D
4(1
D
C Throughout
conslruclion
aclivities
-
C Throughoul
, conslruclion
activilies
-
B Prior 10
conslruction
activities
-
30f4
CP/BO
In the event archaeological resources are unearthed
during excavation activilies associaled with Ihe Projecl,
work shall be slopped immedialely and a qualified
archaeologist, pursuant 10 Ihe procedures sel forth al
CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluale Ihe discovery. If
the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further
mitigalion measures will be developed in concert with
the City.
CPIBO
If human skeletal remains are found allhe projecl site
during earth moving activities such as grading or
trenching, work shall be suspended and Ihe San
Bernardino Counly Coroner's Office shall be notified.
Standard guidelines sel by California law provides for
the treatment of skeletal malerial of Nalive American
origin (California Public Resources Code, Seclions
5097,98 et seq.; Health and Safely Code, Section
7050,5 and olhers). Procedures to be employed in Ihe
treatmenl of human remains are found in, "A
Professional Guide for the Preservation and Proleclion
of Native American Human Remains and Associaled
Grave Goods," published by the California Nalive
American Herilage Commission.
CP/BO
A paleontological monilor will observe earth moving
construclion activily. The moniloring will be on an
intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate
by a qualified paleontologist. The developer will be
responsible for providing Ihe archaeological monitor with
the currenl construclion schedule on a regular basis,
and for nolifying the archaeological monilor if any
unscheduled ground disturbing activ~y is required. The
paleonlological monitor will conducl on-site cultural
resources sensilivily Iraining (crew educalion) as
outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface
paleonlologicai male rials are uncovered, conslruclion
work in Ihe immediate vicin~y will be halted and Ihe
emergency discovery procedures described below will
be implemented. The paleonlological monilor will have
the authority to stop and/or redirect conslruction in Ihe
evenl of an unanticipated discovery.
-
lb
--
4f7
B
Prior 10
construclion
aclivilies
B
CP/BO
Prior 10 the beginning of earth moving cons' n
activities (including initial grading of vegetalion removal),
ali conslruclion personnel (including management) shali
be informed of the paleontological resources and of Ihe
regulatory prolections afforded Ihose resources. The
construction personnel shall also be informed of
procedures relating 10 Ihe discovery of unanlicipated
paleontological resources (as oullined below). They
shall be cautioned not 10 collect fossils, and asked 10
inform a construction supervisor and the onsite
paleontological monitor in the evenl Ihal fossils or
mineralized bones are discovered during Ihe course of
construction. The paleonlologicaJ monilor shall
administer supplemenlal briefings to all new
construction personnel, prior to Iheir commencemenl of
earth moving conslruction aclivilies. The developer will
be responsible for notifying Ihe paleontological monitor
when new conslruclion personnel are scheduled 10 work
on Ihe project.
3
o
Throughoul
conslruclion
aclivities
C
CP/BO
In the evenl paleonlological resources are unearthed
during excavalion aClivlties associaled with Ihe Projecl,
work shall be suspended in Ihe immediale vicin~y of Ihe
finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist shall
evaluale the polential significance of the resource.
During Ihe evaluation period, work can be redirecled 10
nearby locations, as long as Ihe paleontologisl has
determined that Ihere is no potential to impacI other
resources.
Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of VerlfJcatlon Sanctions
CDO . Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate 01 Occupancy
80 - Building Official or designee o - On Compietion 0- Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
Fe - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
7 - Citation
-
w
N
4014
Key to Checklist
RANCHO
t,.:'...:li' -c.l.,.'--.i"''''.
-
CUCAMONGA
"d:..,,..;;':H,!i;r;.'....M> <.-<ill.;~'ilild~.m"-.' _;
:.-"c.."'.
." ,
-' ^' .iid.,h; Hf.<.'fJ';~'\';2;::L~ iii
'"'h:..,'
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 DRC2002-00499, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND FAIRWAY VIEW PLACE, SUBMITTED BY
KSL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, L.P.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the
Improvement Agreement, Securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District NO.1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00499, in the Planning Area VIII of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located at the
southwest corner of 6TH Street and Fairway View Place, was approved by the Planning
Commission on August 28, 2002. This project is for the construction of a 264-Senior
Apartment Project on 9.60 acres of land.
The Developer, KSL Rancho Cucarnonga, L.P., is submitting an agreement and securities
to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$39,100.00
$19,550.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
/33
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00499
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
Yf7f/~vcy-J
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:hh
Attachments
13'1
..,f '
;; J>
ARROW
- 'i ' ~ .
l<
EMPIRE LAK.ES '
GOLF COUf~S~
"i
:t :'t'
w
>
<{ 6TH
Q ST.
>
<{
I
.
. NORTH
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGlNEERING DIVISION
~',Z,
'W
~ ~
~~ ;;1
~~ ::i
:"':: hi,
~~'
" ,
.."
..
,
ROUTE,
SITE,
5/77 ST
,
4TH STREET
~
N
ITEM:dLCI1/IJ2-1J1J~9'1
TrrI;E;Y/CINITY ~
r
EXHIBIT:
/35
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1- t>2 '1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00499
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 18, 2004, by KSL Rancho
Cucamonga, L.P., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real
property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest comer of 6111
Street and Fairway View Place; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as DRC2002-00499; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is
authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized
to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to
approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
J3~
RESOLUTION NO.
ot;-t>S t>
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 FOR DRC2002-00499
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No, I (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapler 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that Ihe requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the terri tory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provlSlons of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XlIill of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XlIill") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply 10 the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B herelo
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
137
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00400
February 18, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and detennines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c, Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
/3<6
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
KSL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, L.P.
The legal description of the Property is:
All that certain real property situated, lying and being in the County of San Bernardino, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Parcel A, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as
shown on Certificate of Compliance No. 554 recorded June 27, 2003 as Instrument No. 2003-
0473625, Official Records on San Bernardino County, State of California.
Together with the rights set forth in that certain Drainage Acceptance Agreement dated July 19,
2000 and executed by and between General Dynamics Preperties, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, recorded August 2, 2000 as
Instrument No. 2000277673, of Official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I
/89
eXHI8/T 'if-,~'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
SIXTH STRm _"...,. ,....., '.,";,":jf~f::i~
__1!:!!1~!..~_ ____NaJl"~;.~_~~~',. ".",.,.,__~
i ", , .:> ';;~;:,
~JI'4"''''-511.'; I'- '. ," :~<~;:~1~'::;:.-."-~k"",
'~/',r"-,,:r._J.~~-~f - .:"<"c;" "., ._",
~:': ';- ;":.0',:. "."
NOfT20"2
ISO.OO'
ii,
.
! ~
,.,
I
I
....
.,
~k '
~
It')
,~~"
.9~~"
"'. ' ..
""- ..
<<~
.9 ""'"
,''''
'"
~
~
,
'~JJ'
T
,
\
\
~
<0- '
,
"'-1, :.
>:;,~t/if';~
.1_1.~~\
," .~!~~~:?-r?~~}""-'.' -
li
f:J::':~:"~~';' - .--.~,
-;;'....,'-";:..,:-,-":-.;.:-
.. . <it??: .. {t:
, - - ,
.. .
- ~ --.~< '-; ,
., ~,'> -~- -
"
lLu .sa:
(.) <,"'n. '
,< A...." '"
-J - ',p.a ;.....0 .
a.. /~...~.
~
S
,>- '
~
Q::
~
".
.j<"
, iRI,'"
.~.
L 13::JIJW:'
helV Sll'U"tT lncS SI FA.
Ex!Jl/N6 SIMEr l/5I1TS ~ EA.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
..
NORTI, 1./ ()
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. I (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88
acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the
City. These sites are not considered to be associated with anyone particular area within the City,
but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do
nol represent a distinct area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this
district have been annexed upon development.
The various sites maintained by this district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street
trees, enlry monuments, community trails and parks, The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear
Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park
and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Lighl Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
B-1
fiN
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004)
For Project: DRC2002-00499
Street Lights
SLD # 1
5800L
Landscaping
LMD#l
Community Trail
DGSF
9500L
6*
Number of Lamps
16,OOOL 22,OOOL
Turf
SF
Non-Turf
SF
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Units
1 264
S 1
264
B-2
27,500L
Trees
EA
58
L I
132
/~2.
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvoe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revp.nne
Single Parcel 7699 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733.161.71
Family
Multi- Unit 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70
Family
Commllnd Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42
TOTAL $1,062,535.83
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00499) is:
264 Units x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92,21 Rate Per A.u. = $12,171.72 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvoe Units T Jnits Factor Units Unit Revp.ntlp.
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17,77 $81,344,66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00499) is:
264 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $4,691.28 Annual Assessment
11I3
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
Ii> ;L;.~".
''''''<< ..c....,.{ :::".;"., ,d ,{
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00511, located at 8657 and
8661 Pecan Avenue (APN:229-181-09 and 229-181-12) submitted by Samuel
V. DiCarlo and Barbara J. DiCarlo
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2002-00511,
accepting Ihe subject agreemenl and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Slreet Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor
and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00511, located at 8657 and 8661 Pecan Avenue in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 8) Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 2003
for the Development of two (2) exisling parcels.
The Developer, Samuel V. and Barbara J. DiCarlo, are submitting an agreement and securities to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Cash Bond
Labor and Material Cash Bond
$ 27,100.00
$ 13,550.00
Respectfully submitted,
C()r {>U~if
William J. O'Neil
Cily Engineer
WJO:MB:hh
Attachmenls
II/t(
FOOTHILL
BLVD
LLi ~
>
<( <( ROUTE
ARROW
z Project: DRC2002-D0511
<( ,8661 Pecan (APN:229-181-12)
lU
Il. 8657 Pecan (APN:229-181-09)
0 <( AVE.
nt: D
Z
~ ~
Z
0 ~
4TH ' STREET
AN BERNARDINO
IOFWY
N-
I
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
ENGINEERING
DIVISION
Item: Staff Report
Title: Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT 1: DRC2002-00511
/'15
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1- 631
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00511
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement by Samuel V. DiCarlo and Barbara J. DiCarlo as
developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at 8657 and 8661 Pecan Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as DRC2002-00511; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by
the City Attorney.
It{"
RESOLUTION NO. O'f-O.E2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-
00511
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such proVISIOns of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consenl And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
/1.(7
I
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00511
February 18, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Tenitory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Tenitory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Tenitory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Tenitory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Tenitory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Tenitory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the'
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Tenitory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Tenitory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Tenitory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Tenitory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Tenitory.
ILlS
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
Samuel V. Di Carlo and Barbara J. Di Carlo, husband and wife as community property
The legal description of the Property is:
, THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 393, TRACT NO. 2101, FONTANA
ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 31 OF MAPS, PAGES 11 THROUGH 15 OF MAPS, INCLUSIVE, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH
ONE-HALF AND THE CENTERUNE OF PECAN A VENUE, 60.00 FEET WIDE, SAID
INTERSECTION IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTH ONE-HALF;
THENCE NORTH 89024'13" EAST 366.89 FEET ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE;
THENCE NORTH 0035'47" WEST 134.00 FEET ALONG A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO
THE SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH 89024'13" WEST 365.34 FEET ALONG A LINE
PARALLEL TO THE SAID SOUTH LINE TO A POINT IN THE SAID CENTERLINE OF
SAID PECAN A VENUE; THENCE SOUTH 0004'00" EAST 134.01 FEET ALONG THE SAID
CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
NOTE: AREAS AND DISTANCES ARE COMPUTED TO STREET CENTERS.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I
/i/9
--
EXHIBIT"A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
_ARROW ROUTE
q/
~ ~I
(j)1
365.34' -=1
1u.J b - - - -
b 0 I b 332.34'
/0 iJ) 0
'./ h~; A::bZ~~_I~~:' ~I~
V-- G2720:~:~
130'~- - 33;L8~ _ ~
I N89024' , 3"E
30'
I
N89024" 3"E
--
N89024'I O"E
630,19'
4'
--
--
627.190" -
--
86(, I PECAN
API1:Z2'l-/BH2...
_?
~....l-
~-3t~
, -
o -
If\
-"",,- ('/
293.3/'
630.20'- -
WHITTRAM AVENUE
LEGEND
::a:: 5"800 I-Ll/'''EN liPSV
STRErrLl4i-11
Sl2cL ST~cer TIlCG"S
<i:
~
.A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A-2.
NORTII
/S(')
DRC2002.-oD5/1
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 200212003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
CommerciallIndustrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed
' to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals localed on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally,
this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets
and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
B-1
ISI
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: DRC2002-00511 (APN: 229-181-09)
Street Lights
Sill # 1
Sill # 6
5800L
1
Landscaping
L3B
Community Trail
DOSF
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres
N/A 1.126
S 1
2AU
For Project: DRC2002-00511 (APN: 229-181-12)
Street Lights
Sill # 1
Sill # 6
5800L
Landscaping
L3B
Community Trail
DOSF
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres
N/A 1.374
S 1
2AU
Number of Lamps
9500L 16,OOOL 22,OOOL
Turf
SF
Non-Turf
SF
S6
1 AU
Number of Lamps
9500L 16,OOOL 22,OOOL
Turf
SF
Non-Turf
SF
S6
1 AU
B-2
--
27,500L
Trees
EA
-5-
L3B
1 AU
27,500L
Trees
EA
L3B
1 AU
/52
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
DRC2002-00511 (APN: 229.181.09)
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDVSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03.
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance
(Commerci a]lIndustri a]):
The following table
District No. 3B
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Commllnd Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00511) is:
I.I26 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.V. = $397.25 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (AV.) is $]7.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units I Jnits Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533,54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288,82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00511) is:
1.126 Acres x 2 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.D. = $40.02 Annua] Assessment
C -1
/53
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AD.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No'. 6
(Commerci aI/Industrial):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
ComrnlInd Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00511) is:
1.126 Acres x 1 AD. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per AD. = $57.88 Annual Assessment
C - 2
1St(
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
DRC2002-00511 (APN: 229-181-12)
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03.
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape' Maintenance
(Commerci allIndus trial):
The following table
District No. 3B
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Commllnd Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00511) is:
1.374 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $484.75 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets):
#of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units 1 Jnit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-0051l) is:
1.374 Acres x 2 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AD. = $48,83 Annual Assessment
C -I
155
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commerci aIlIndustrial):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvoe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00511) is:
1.374 Acres x 1 A.D. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.D. = $70628 Annual Assessment
C - 2
/56
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
t'j;
,i,-_C;_;u.:-<y{<-;,__;;~__-, _"J -',
.\h,.'
';.i',X" _ ;-;.;;t;c;;~\ViY.-... ;;;..." ."',.lw'.:,sFr:':. :.'I.;J
E~GIN[F.RING D[DARTM[NT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00922,
LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF FAIRWAY VIEW PLACE, SOUTH OF
6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER ON
MilLIKEN
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the
Improvement Agreement, Securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District NO.3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00922, in the Planning VIII of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located at the
east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6TH Street was approved by the City Planner
January 30, 2003. The project is for the construction of a 62,641 square foot office
building on 3.75 acres of land.
The Developer, Fairway Business Center on Milliken, is submitting an agreement and
securities to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Cash Bond
labor and Material Cash Bond:
$23,200.00
$11,600.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
/57
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00922
February 18, 2004
Page 2
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the
City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
YftC ttpV(
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:hh
Attachments
/sg
t .
. :."'"...-
ARROW
ROUTE
. "
" '"
.... ~.-,
t :"t
EMPIRE LAKES "
GOLf COURS.E
w
>
<{ 6TH
~ ST.
>
<{
:r:
I
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGlNEERING DIVISION
SITE "'
~"
~.
~"
~
~.:'
57#. ST
~"
<{ "4TH STREET
z
l.LI
~
:J
...J
-
~
~
. N
ITEM:/lLClldt-dtJf~~
TITLE:
EXHIBIT:
/59
RESOLUTION NO. () '1- 0.33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00922
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 18, 2004, by Fairway Business
Center on Milliken, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real
property sRecifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Fairway View Place,
south of 6 h Street; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney.
/~()
-
RESOLUTION NO. 6 If - 6.3 'i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS.1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00922
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No.6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the terri tory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of
California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to
levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
I~/
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFRANCHOCUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed
the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from
the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual
assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
/ ~ 2..,
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER ON MILLIKEN
The legal description of the Property is:
Portion of Parcel 7 and Parcel 8 of Parcel Map No. 15350 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 190 of parcel maps,
pages 31 to 33 inclusive, records of said County.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
/tP3
&'XHI8/7 if-,~'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRlCT NO. 38
STREET LIGHTING MAlNTENANCE DISTRlCT NOS. 1 AND 6
_~x.!:.L!..'R~ET _ -':..... ':;:%"~~_~;}:;iJ:;.~~ .
(llWn.""W) i ;
l1$&l.JlI'J. i
"""",.,.
......
I
'0 9
.
'" ~
I
g i
"-
....
....
~ R.
" "
!
'"
~
'"
~
.... I
;Z .'
" ~
- !
~ ..
;l
G
..,
'\.0-
,
,
.,.
..,
10
,~
g~~.....
....q,........ - ........
<'</
. 9 7.;>.... 61;..,-
. -~o'
I
..L..
l
I
\
\
\
\
:. ;c;....-,.:.:...,
~:;~:-)...:;'f'; ,,,. ....:...,;/;'i~.'
....
. ....-"
. .' ..I;.,ie,,/;,
, ffI~~
... . ,... t'Xr'i ...
.....-- "-:"'.'- ':';'.~.;.."""'.-
"..., "'" ,'.,'- ~.~"(
;. ;:,',;:.H~:~'
:'r tf~I~Jt~
\~E~::!jj'lTr
''''',.! Ie;
,
".
'.... .... .' ""
. ~U..;",;,qo_ . ".' '
...,J :.5"/ -~ .." _
. . ~/ IQ. ..'
S
,>-
~
Q:
~
".
.jr
.@
L ::~-~~'--i;~.;_~frf:),l
.' .-.:,-.~,) ",';-"
IKW srNEr "es ~I EA.
.- !X/STIN6 ~ L/611lS 3EA.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
.A
NORT)~ 'I
MCgdt/'-tJIJ9fl
~
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL)
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
CommerciallIndustrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways,
street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres
associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance
building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City
but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses
the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district
consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on
industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard.
1(,6
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed addition to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: DRC2002-00728
Street Lights
SLD # 1
Sill # 6
5800L
Landscaping
LMD # 3B
Community Trail
DGSF
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU or Acres
1 3.75
S 1
7.50
Number of Lamps
9500L 16,000L 22,000L
3*
Turf
SF
Non-Turf
SF
S2
3.75
27,500L
Trees
EA
21
Ll
3.75
/4,(p
Exhibit C
To
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (AU) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2003/04.
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance
(Commerci al/Industri al):
The following table
District No. 3B
# of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
T :mci TJ~p. TTnitTvnp. ITnit~ TTnit~ F:lc.tnr TTnit~ Trnit R f'vpnnp
CommlInd Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00922) is:
3.75 Acres x I AU Factor x $352.80 Rate Per AU. '= $1323.00 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (AU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
T :mn fT,p T Toit Tvnp TTn1t, T Toils F:lr.tnr Hnits TTnit R pvpnllf~
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property DRC2002-00922) is:
3.75 Acres x 2 AU. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU '= $133.28 Annual Assessment
/~1
-
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (commercial/industrial):
#of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
r :mrl TJ~p. TJnit Tvnf': TTnit.;;: TTnits. F~rtClr TTnit, TTnit Rf'vpnllp.
Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00922) is:
3.75 Acres xl A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $192.75 Annual Assessment
I~S
RAN C Hoe U C A M 0 N G A
.,; ~_;C'-'
_ ;4
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT
14771, LOCATED NORTH OF RINGSTEM DRIVE, EAST OF HAVEN
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY TOLL BROTHERS AND RELEASE OF
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 15, 1997,
FROM LAUREN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution (1) accepting the new
improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, (2) releasing
the previous Improvement Agreement and Securities and authorizing the Finance
Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit, and (3) authorizing
the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements
BACKGROUNDI ANALYSIS
The map, Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for
Tract 14771, located north of Ringstem Drive, east of Haven Avenue, was approved by
City Council on October 15, 1997. The Tract Map was recorded on October 17, 1997.
The property has been purchased by Toll Brothers, who has submitted an Agreement
and Securities to guarantee the Completion of the Public Improvements in the following
amounts:
N/t
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TOLL BROTHERS, NORTH OF RINGSTEM DRIVE, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Faithful Performance Bond
$791,900.00
$395,950.00
$ 4,500.00
Labor and Material Bond:
Monumentation Cash Deposit
The above mentioned, securities shall replace the securities submitted by the original
developer, Lauren Development, Inc., and accepted by City Council on October 15,
1997. By process of this agreement, Toll Brothers, as the new developer, has
responsibility of the project.
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
"\ II
do{ (/z lvL/V(
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:hh
Attachments
/76
SAN BERNARDINO
NATIONAl FOREST
TAC~STEM
~CT
I.&J HIDDEN LOCATION
;:, FARM ROAD
z
~ CARRARl
ff; STREET 1
~ SOU ER CANl'a
'IV II ...J I.&J
ct: ~~ ~ :) ,
I.&J Z . ~.
:I: ~- w
HILLSIDE ROAD ~ ~
JI II . "" I[
WILLSON AVENUE
II II II
NOT TO SCAlE
VICNTV MAP'
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~
N
YrEM:H~CT /477/
TITLE:Y/C/NITr MAE!.
EXHIBIT:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
J7(
RESOLUTION NO. () '-1- D3!5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
FOR TRACT 14771 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY
COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 15, 1997
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California did
consider an Improvement Agreement, related Securities and Monumentation Cash
Deposit, submitted by Toll Brothers, as developer, for the Improvement of Public Right-
Of-Way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located
north of Ringstem Drive, east of Haven Avenue and release of the previously approved
Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Lauren
Development, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanies by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that (1) said Improvement Agreement,
Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by Toll Brothers are
hereby approved, (2)the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit from Lauren Development, Inc. are released and (3) the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
/72.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
',',.,
,".~ .,'"
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 4, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Joseph Stofa, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16365,
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY
REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC. - APN: 227-201-44
RECOMMENDA TrON
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel
Map 16365, accepting the subject agreement, securities, and ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 3 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause
said map to record.
BACKGROUND! ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 16365, located on the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard
and Foothill Boulevard in the Regional related Office/Commercial and Mixed Use
District, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 14, 2004 for the division
of 11.84 acres into 5 parcels.
The Developer(s), Regency Realty Group, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond
$184,000.00
$ 92,000.00
173
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 16365 - REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC.
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water Company. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
C(}et/1Am
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JS:dlw
Attachments
/7'1
STREET
5
HIGHlAND AVENUf
VICTORIA PARK LANE
BASE . liNe ROAD
~ ~ L&J
g ~ ~
~ ~ ~\,
- "'I: 15 ~
N ~
~ ~ >- 0-
~
~ i ~
g u
>-
1E C!i u ~
NOT 10 SCAlE
CHURCH -
>-
C!i
PROJECT ~
SITE ~
- -
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
f VlCNTY MAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: _
ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ TITLE: _
EXHIBIT:
-
--J
lh
RESOLUTION NO. o'-/-CJ3~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 16365, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Parcel Map 16365 submitted by Regency Realty Group, Inc. consisting of 5-
regional related office/commercial parcels, located at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard
and Foothill Boulevard approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on
January 14, 2004 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No.
28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16365 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land
approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map 16365; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final
map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement
Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Regency Realty Group, Inc., as
developers; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for
dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the
easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements
and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 16365 is hereby approved and
the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
17~
RESOLUTION NO. OJ.:(- 6 E 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL
MAP 16365
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the terri tory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such proVISIOns of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article Xnill of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article Xnill") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
/77
RESOLUTION NO.
PARCEL MAP 16365
February 18,2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIm applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessm!"nts against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
/7C?
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC.
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL 19 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15716-1, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I
/71
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 200312004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed
to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community.
Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of
Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
B-1
1<t6
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004)
For Project: Parcel Map 16365
Street Lights
SLD # 1
SLD # 3
5800L
Number of Lamps
9500L 16,000L 22,000L
Landscaping
LMD #2
Community Trail
DGSF
Turf
SF
2500
*Existing items installed with original project
B-2
Non-Turf
SF
375
27,500L
Trees
EA
76
I~{
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL)
The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2003/04.
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance
(Commercial/Industrial) :
The following table
District No. 3B
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Ifse Ifnit Tvne Ifnits Ifnits Factor Units Ifnit Revenue
Commllnd Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16365) is:
11.5 Acres x 1 A.D. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $4,057.20 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (AD.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets):
# of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Ifse Ifnit Tvne Ifnits Ifnits Factor Ifnits Ifnit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16365) is:
11.5 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $408.71 Annual Assessment
C -1
1~2.
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 (VIcrORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Ose Onil Tvoe Ooils Units Factor Onils Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00
Family
Multi- Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,846.60
Family
Commercial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17
Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59
TOTAL $254,339.36
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (16365) is:
11.5 Acres x 2 A.D. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,084.45 Annual Assessment
C - 2
1<t.3
I
CERTIFICA TE OF SUFFICIENCY
CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXA TION
FOR PARCEL MAP 16365
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B,
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WILLIAM J. O"NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows:
That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA.
That on the llth day of February 2004 reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation
pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is
on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my
examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners
of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District.
That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
EXECUTED this 11 th day of February 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Jl /Uc.le((
/--t CITY INEER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7
I C{L(
1...
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
tNGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SlJBJECf:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT NO. 16370
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND
ARBOR LANE SUBMITTED BY VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC - APNS: 227-
l61-46 and 47
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16372,
accepting the subject Improvement Agreement and Security, ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No.2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3
and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS:
Tract No. 16370 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) located on the northwest comer of
Church Street and Arbor Lane was approved by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2001 for
the development of 555 single family lots. Tract No. 16370 allows for the construction of 82
single-family residences.
The Developers, Standard Pacific Corporation will be constructing 44 single family residences
and US Homes will be constructing 38 single family residences and each Developer has
submitted an agreement and security to guarantee their portion of construction of the off-site
improvements in the following amounts:
J&5
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16370 - VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC
February 18, 2003
Page 2
Standard Pacific Corporation (ROW2004-001551
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$493,700
$246,850
US Homes (ROW2004-001571
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
$402,400
$201,200
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office
Respectfully submitted,
()xU1Af
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JS:dlw
Attachments
I <6~
l J "'-
LINE ROAfl r:. ~
......
r:n"T' .:r-:- 1'71
l:ll'I' ~:jl~ r:.....j;\"
."1.1...... --'- . .
B ".
. -:.' - ~I.f.tu.
. y; -;- "'.' J:RACI NO:
...., . c-'- I"'" .
!0~~: " "~.,...~, ~
., . .11 .' .1' ';I.. ~ .
,:-'." '.\.' . ~"'-
-'....... . f'(';'" - ..
.j. . -I- . , . i~~~"~ ) . .
.\~ .
:\. . OI'!:K' -:- .
-T...... ..... . ~ -:- .,' __' -0
. .' . -:- tki4 .. .
I--.: . . .' ., 'L' .);.. ,.:... ..1-
[i\. .1+ .1.1. '1'1'/'<...- ~ ~ti: ~~ ...;, 615 . , "
. "1Ii1i~' 'lijW" '. .. -:- .
r.- .1.1.'... .'.11 ." $. .' ,!cO -:- ~[I -:- .
--;- .1' . :- ~{..:! , . .
I-'- :-[-1-1... .'.1.1..... . ~ '. :s;. ~
. . ';-. " '.. ....:. '- .:...,.. .. ..... .I././oi.. 'O""I,::rWLil '1.1.1..:r.. #1.1+1.1.1-1,)'
: If. -'- -;- r;-r;- .;- . <--;- . . H -;- . -/'/. ~ .
J7:T. 1'.1.4. -;- -;- f-;-f-;- --;. ~ H -;- . . .. .1./. . :: .
., .,_,_1.. ..:.. i--;-I-;- r-; -';- . -1-... rO- -;- f11ff1'-" .,.,....-'-. .... .1'f.I..~.
I--'- .,.... ',',',' t-'-. - ~ -;- l-'-.lLY-' ..., . . .'-". "
. G- l/ . . . ~""",.'ut. .f-'-' , ...t. ',./,..; .....I.I.I.~..
J..;. -:- ..1.\.1' 0.:.. . .1..... ..:j.I.I...I.I;j,'\ v.~:y~.., 1-7 'R" ....-.: i
Ii: \-'-- ~ - . '. '.:i: 1-..')., . i--;- . ;;:- .
. . . ....:. "---'.r h
I-';-~ V...---- " I 1 r- ~ . . . H . ~'" .. ..1.1.... .
. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 -......;: .~ '_~' 'Y.~'llBl{J.I:5il~
llr ; ~~
~JI.
[
.
{
I l
.
"
~
I
z
o
'"
S
w
~
'"
g
:;!
u
z
III
~
o
'"
I
..
ffi
'"
u
>-
is
z
o
'"
S
w
~
'"
o
~
...J
-<
U
Z
'"
!l!
!:;
o
'"
/
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370
VICTORiA ARBORS
CITY OFfWCtO..........~. ootJNfY OFBNf ElERJrWI:1I<<), STAn! ClFCAl..J'IOfN4
~--~............
.~~~_.
~
~"'"
~
.~::.!.
PfEPNEDBY'
....
-
~--;;:.:.;::=-,..
-
~
PlEPAAED "'"
~ST^"DAJU) PACIFJ(; HoMEs I
'.1'...,....... RII~I'" O'V., 1111
---.----.--
..
!ill
"'...v~1lOAD
N<A_HlI..LS.c",Wi/.lIl
rl~ll"~~
FJ\X,(7'~)~
-
CO
~
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1- t:>3g
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 16370, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tract Map 16370 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) submitted by
Victoria Arbors, LLC and consisting of 82 single family homes located at the northwest comer
of Church Street and Arbor Lane was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on March 7, 2001 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act
and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16370 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land
approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map No.15974; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final
map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement
Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific Corporation and
US Homes, as developers; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication,
for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements
dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements
and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16370 is hereby approved and the
City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
I~~
RESOLUTION NO. () t./- 6.3 q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16370
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No.2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the terri tory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provIsIOns of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
IS1
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16370
February 18, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shaIl be applicable to the Territory.
/16
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC
The legal description of the Property is:
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCELS 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 AND 11 OF PARCEL
MAP NO. 15641, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 192, PAGES 93 TO
100, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I
/1/
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the
Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such
any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels
within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to
those parcels within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos,
community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park,
Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGill MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community.
Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of
Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
B-1
/92..
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004)
For Project: Tract 16370
5800L
Number of Lamps
9500L 16,000L 22,000L
Street Lights
SLD # 1
SLD # 3
31
Landscaping
LMD #2
Community Trail
DGSF
Turf
SF
1628
*Existing items installed with original project
B-2
Non-Turf
SF
9369
27,500L
Trees
EA
121
,Q3
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A V.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of Physical #of Rate Per
Vnits Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 5060 1.00 5060 $422.00 $2,177,520.00
Family
Multi- Parcel 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00
Famil y
Comm/Ind. Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $422.00 $37,287.92
Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84
TOTAL $2,302,791.76
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16370) is:
82 Units 1 AU. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per AU. = $34,604.00 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l.and Use Ilnit Tvne Units T Tnlt~ Factor {Jnits Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16370) is:
82 Units xl A.V. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $,1457.14 Annual Assessment
C-I
I crt{
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINrENANCE DISTRICf NO.3 (VICfORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00
Family
Multi- Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,846.60
Family
Commercial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17
Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59
TOTAL $254,339.36
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (16370) is:
82 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.u. = $3,866.30 Annual Assessment
C - 2
,QS
THE CITY Of
~ ANCU 0 Cue ~ M O'N' G ^
"';:~
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECr:
February 4, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY RIDER AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16455, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND THE SOUTHBOUND 1-15
FREEWAY ONRAMP, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES,
INe.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16455,
accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No.9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 and authorizing the Mayor to sign
said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map 16455, located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and the southbound
1-15 Freeway onramp, in the medium residential district, was approved by the Planning Commission
on August 27, 2003, for a subdivision of I numbered lot and 5 lettered lots, for the development of
. 156 condominiums on 11.14 acres of land.
The insurance carrier for the Developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., has agreed to provide
a rider adding Tract 16455 to the existing improvement bonds for Tract 16454. The Developer
agrees that said bonds will not be released for either tract until the conditioned improvements for
both tracts are completed and accepted by the City. The Developer is submitting an agreement and
security rider to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Rider to Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 16454
Rider to Labor and Material Bond Tract 16454
Monumentation Cash Deposit
$ 3,l6l,500.00
$ 1,580,750.00
$ 2,650.00
/q(p
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT NO. 16455 - KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC.
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security rider are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and
Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
C11f D1/lJvf
WiIIiam~'~eil
City Engineer
WJO:RG:dlw
Attachments
/q7
VICTORIA
STREET
'"
:::>
z
rn '"
... C! ~
z PlATEAU
z ~ ti Ii;
fi ~ ti ~ ~
, ~ BAY ST.
ST. ~I_ i5 i DR.
DAI<
UMA DR.
BASEUNE
C!
i
fi
Ei
"
a
!!I
z
~
\lOON CHASE ~ DAY
! ~ b!~
;t z
~
GETTYsaURC
RNER OAkS DRIVE :II
~
MILLER AVENUE
GMlAY CT
V1CINffY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
.~ ..
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
. -.. . -. --
ITEM: Tf2.ACT MAP N/). /ft,4Sr:;
TITLE: VJc-~^!ITY/'1~f
EXHIBIT: :1.... / q ~
ENGINEERING DIVISION
RESOLUTION NO. D'I- t) 1../0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 16455, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16455, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles,
Inc., and consisting of a subdivision of 11.14 acres of land into I numbered lot and 5 lettered
lots, for the development of 156 condominiums, located at the southwest comer of Base Line
Road and the southbound 1-15 Freeway onramp, was approved by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 27, 2003; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16455 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite' to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by posting a Security Rider to the Tract 16454 Improvement Securities by KB Home
Greater Los Angeles, Inc. as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract Map No. 16455 be and the same is hereby approved and
the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
jq9
RESOLUTION NO. Ot( - tJ'I/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT 16455
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No.9, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provIsIOns of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
1. 6tJ
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16455
February 4, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
2. 6/
.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC.,
a California Corporation
The legal description of the Property is:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" (pages A-2 to A-5)
A-I
2(J2..
EXHIBIT "A"
TENTATNE lRACT MAP NO. 16455, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERlY:
PARCEL NO.1:
LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PREUMINARY MAP OF ETlWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNlY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER PlAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNlY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 AND THE
CENTER LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 33
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 127 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST,
A DISTANCE OF 114.93 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 20 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52", A DISTANCE OF 31.4S FEET TO A LINE TANGENT; THENCE NORTH
o DEG. 00' 34" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE
(66 FEET WIDE); THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM AlL THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 3 LYING WEST OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 wrrn THE SOUTH
LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 34' 44" WEST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 360.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 385.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 242
FEET, PlUS OR MINUS, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 300 FEET EASTERLY
OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE, SAID
POINT BEING NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 1029.61 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF
BASELINE AVENUE FROM THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTION OF SAID BASELINE AVENUE AND
ETIWANDA AVENUE, AS SAID AVENUES ARE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED MAP OF SAID
ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 370.02 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 32.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 63 DEG. 48' 59" EAST, 114 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 40' 44" EAST, 54
FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 81.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 00' 34"
WEST, 50.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY wrrn A
RADIUS OF 270 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENlRAL ANGLE
OF 18 DEG. 42' 55", A DISTANCE OF 88.19,FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST,
A-2
TR. 16455
ZtJ.3
EXHIBIT "A" (CONTINUED)
169.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AlSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WITH THE SOUTH
LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST ALONG
SAID SOUTH UNE OF BASELINE, 199.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, PARALLEL
TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 47.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, 129.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47 34"
WEST, PARAllEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF BASELINE, 142.D1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 DEG. U'
01" EAST, 150.04 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF
BASELINE; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF
BASEUNE, 118.11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52" AND A DISTANCE OF 31.'18 FEET 10
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO.2:
THE EAST 1/2 OF LOT 6, BlOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE
ETlWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNIY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAlIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNIY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR
FREEWAY PURPOSES IN A DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1973, IN BOOK 8207, PAGE 426,
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEl. NO.3:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE
ETlWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNIY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S)
24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNlY, DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER UNE OF BASELINE A VENUE, 66 FEET WIDE, SAID
POINT BEING NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 1029.61 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER UNE OF
BASELINE AVENUE FROM THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTION OF SAID BASEUNE AVENUE AND
ETlWANDA AVENUE, SAID AVENUES ARE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED MAP OF SAID ETlWANDA
COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 370.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01 DEG. 11' 01" WEST, 32.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
63 DEG. 48' 59" EAST, 114 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 40' 44" EAST, 54 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" EAST, 81.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" WEST, 50.97 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 270 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG. 42' 55", A
DISTANCE OF 88.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 47' 34" WEST, 169.60 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO.4:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETlWANDA
COLONY LANDS, IN THE cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUN1Y OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID
A-3
TR. 16455
2tJ'/
EXHIBIT "A" (CONTINUED)
COUNIY, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASf LINE OF SAID lOT 3 WITH THE SOUTH
LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH B9 DEG. 47' 34" WESf ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE, 19B.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EAST, PARAllEL
10 THE EASf LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 47.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 0 DEG. 00' 34" EASf, 129.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH B9 DEG. 47' 34"
WESf, PARAllEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF BASELINE, 142.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 DEG. 11'
01" EASf, 1S0.04 FEET10A POINTTHATIS 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF
BASELINE; THENCE NORTH B9 DEG. 47' 34" EASf, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF
BASELINE, 11B.B1 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHWESf AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CEN1RAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52", A DISfANCE Of 31.48 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. B:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 11, BLOCK "R", AS SHOWN ON PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETlWANDA
COLONY LANDS, IN THE em OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNIY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS Of SAID
COUNIY, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH B9 DEG. 48' 5r EASf, 401.51 FEET; THENCE COURSE "A", SOUTH
44 DEG. 47' 32" WESf 569.3B FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID
WESf LINE, NORTH 0 DEG. 3' 01" WEST, 402.7B FEET 10 THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 10:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETlWANDA
COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNIY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNlY, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EASf LINE OF SAID LOT 3, AND THE
CENTER LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASf LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF
33.00 FEET OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERlY ALONG
SAID EASf LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 127.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH B9 DEG. 47' 34"
WESf, A DISTANCE OF 114.93 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERlY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 11' 52", A DISTANCE OF 31.45 FEET TO A LINE TANGENT;
THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 11' 34" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
BASELINE AVENUE (66.00 FEET WIDE); THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF
BASELINE AVENUE 10 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 11:
LOTS 2 AND 7, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY
LANDS, IN THE em OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNIY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNIY.
A-4
TR. 16455
2~5
EXHffiIT "A" (CONTINUED)
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 2 AND 7, BLOCK "R", PREUMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA
COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNlY, AS CONTAINED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION' FILED MARCH 31, 1975, IN
BOOK 8647, PAGE 607, OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF
LAST SAID LOT, NORTH 0 DEG. 03' 16" WEST, 262.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44 DEG. 47' 32"
EAST, 569.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WIlli A RADIUS
OF 1200 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN1RAL ANGLE OF
22 DEG. 50' 02", A DISTANCE OF 478.23 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE
ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 7, SOUTH 0 DEG. 03' 31" EAST,
1061.11 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE, SOUTH
89 DEG. 48' 57" WEST, 663.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 12:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK "R", ACCORDING TO THE PREUMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA
COLONY LANDS, IN THE OTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNlY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STA~
OF CAUFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNlY, AND AS CONTAINED IN DIRECTOR'S DEED FROM THE STA~ OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO DEVORE EAST, LTD., RECORDED NOVEMBER 5, 1975,
IN BOOK 8799, PAGES 944 AND 945, OFFICIAL RECORDS, INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED LINES:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSEcnON OF THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE
OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE CENlER UNE OF BASELINE ROAD, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP AS AN
UNNAMED STREET, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE ALONG SAID CENIER UNE, NORTH 89 DEG. 44'
36" EAST, 88.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14 DEG. 45' 32" WEST, 159.18 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1200
FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AlONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 DEG. 11'
58", A DISTANCE OF 150.78 FEET TO SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 1; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST
LINE AND SAID PROLONGATION, NORTH 0 DEG. 03' 31" WEST, 296.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
A-5
TR. 16455
2/)6'.
EXHIBIT "A - '1."
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.9
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8. .
~
i
,i
II
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I~
~
~""
, I.~
:. .i
.I/~
Ii
I
. i
. I
. I
,
i
I
r
I j
I
. "
; /1:
, II
I I! I
, I'
I ,
/13'
,I
i
I
i '
, ,
t..Mb APCA
---...."
,. 11 11 IS ,.. 'I I.
~8/
-~
~~<-
! "
! "
'" ..
Pi lW
I!: I : \ t----::=.:::::-:-...
E-~::=i~~~7~rF-}tr--:~==
.~ . \.\.i .'!':11.
!.. : II
. il L ;.,' ,If
....---.: . L:...-......_ --l! J- III
-'-~-+==='--r--'-~ H' . .
....--,. . ----=-.,--r-----:--; ....
:JI iif~~-..
i!1 " 'f' ...,:-.
~ . iW. -,:::>........
y,
/(-:i:.:'"
,,/
II :II at . ,. .. .7
. D "iI 21
.. 50
... ... ".
.. .,
RSlI.
1D8IJO
u .. lIS ..
I
,.
I
j
STf?t=ET L/(iHTS
STreE ET f{i!Ees
(COtJSTF:UCT€t:> Wr7H
74- eA.
JD1 €A.
77<. /tP454-i)
:0'.
..
._~..._~..-
.--,-----~._.
CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA'
COUNT-V-OF$A,ll!l8.ERNAR>>llNO
ST ATE~cii~'cALiFbi~1jl- . ,'"
. . - -. '. - . > t ~;
'.
NORTH
. --..2~f-~--
7f?..... .lb4t;..~. >,:;:'>"'"~
. - . .,' ~~., __:....n. ", ..... _~,
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINENANCE DISTRICT NO.9 (LOWER ETIW ANDA)
Landscape Maintenance District No.9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the
Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any
benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within
that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels
within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
Street Light Maintenance District No.8 (Sill #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South
Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda
A venue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland A venue within the incorporated area
of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within
this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area.
B-1
2. 6<6
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004)
For Project: Tract 16455
Street Lights
SLD # 1
SLD # 8
5800L
59*
Landscaping
LMD #9
Community Trail
DGSF
9500L
15*
Number of Lamps
16,000L 22,OOOL
Turf
SF
*Existing items installed with Tract 16454-1.
Assessment Units by District
Parcel · DU
156
Sl
156
B-2
S8
.156
Non-Turf
SF
II ,650*
27,500L
Trees
EA
59*
L9
156
2tJ1
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.9 (LOWER ETIW ANDA)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $375.91 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No.9 (lower Etiwanda):
# of Physical #of Rate Per
Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 269 1.0 269 $375.91 $101,119.79
Family
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16455) is:
156 Units x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $375.91 Rate Per A.U. = $58,641.96 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District NO.1 (Arterial Streets):
#of #of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use 1 Tnit Tvne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16455) is:
156 Units x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $2,772.12 Annual Assessment
C - 1
2 It>
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
The rate per assessment unit (A.D.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District NO.8 (South Etiwanda):
#of Rate Per
Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tvoe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 350 1.00 350 $193.75 $67,812.50
Family
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (TR 16455
156 Units x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.D. = $30,225.00 Annual Assessment
C - 2
21J
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
c::::=:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
;1
SiaffReport
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Ii,.I:6
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician 1If!)
ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $827,058.40 TO
THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES, AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $82,705.84 FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN
PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, TO BE
FUNDED FROM CFD 2001-01 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
16123035650/1442612-0 AND APPROPRIATE $909,764.24 (CONTRACT
AWARD OF $827,058.40 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$82,705.84) TO ACCOUNT NO. 16123035650/1442612-0 FROM CFD 2001-
01 FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, except that submitted by
CJ Construction, Inc. as non-responsive to the needs of the City, and award and authorize
the execution of the contract in the amount of $827,058.40 to the lowest responsible
bidder, Mega Way Enterprises, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $82,705.84, for the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase 1A of Community
Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from CFD 2001-01 funds, Account No.
16123035650/1442612-0 and appropriate $909,764.24 (Contract award of $827,058.40
plus 10% contingency in the amount of $82,705.84) to Account No.
16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on December 9,
2003, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $697,621.00. Staff has
:212
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: ACCEPT LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
February 18, 2004
Page 2
reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid
requirements, except that submitted by CJ Construction which contained a unit price error.
CJ Construction contacted City staff after bids were opened to report they had made a unit
price error and requested they be allowed to withdraw their bid. This request was made in
writing within five days of the bid opening as required in Section 5100-5107 of the California
Public Contract Code. Staff met with City Attorney to discuss CJ Construction's request to
withdraw their bid and the City Attorney advised staff to allow CJ Construction to withdraw
their bid. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds remaining
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
This phase of Victoria Gardens Mall sphere will construct sidewalk and landscaping on Day
Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Base Line Road, as well as on Church Street
west of Day Creek Boulevard. This is just one of eleven separate construction phases
which will build the infrastructure benefiting the mall as well as development projects to the
north, west and south of the mall. $30 million in funds from two CFD's (CFD's 2001-01 &
2003-01) are allocated for the design and construction of those improvements. Two phases
have been completed; two are currently under contract and under construction, this award
to become the third phase currently under contract. In the upcoming weeks more phases
will come before the City Council requesting action.
Respectfully submitted,
~ t/Zll~ U
Wi~: O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WS/RO:ls
Attachment
2/3
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING DECEMBER 9, 2003 Bid Withdrawn Lowest Responsible Bidder
Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of ENGINEERS COST
Commuuitv Facilities District 2001-01 ESTIMATE CJ Construction, Inc. Meea Wa, EnterDrises
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO OTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. 500 SF Remove PCC Drive Approach $2.00 $1,000.00 $5.00 $2,500.00 $3.00 $1,500.00
2. 70 LF Remove Existing Curb and Gutter $4.00 $280.00 $5.00 $350.00 $5.00 $350.00
3. 5 TNS Asphalt COllcrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $75.00 $375.00 $80.00 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00
4. 80 LF 8" PCC CUlh & 24" Gutter, per City Standard No. 104 $12.00 $960.00 $30.00 $2,400.00 $13.00 $1,040.00
5. 768 SF 8" PCC Driveway Approach $4.00 $3,072.00 $tO.OO $7,680.00 $4.75 $3,648.00
6. 38124 SF 4" PCC Sidewalk (including meandering sidewalk) $2.50 $95,310.00 $2.80 $106,747.20 $2.80 $106,747.20
7. 10 lot, PCC Wheelchair Ramp $500.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 $550.00 $5,500.00
8. I LS irrigation $107,000.00 $107,000.00 $190,000.00 $t90,000.00 $185,000.00 $185,000.00
9. 35496 SF Landscaping $4.00 $t41,984.00 $5.50 $195,228.00 $4.20 $149,083.20
10. 29264 SF Cobble; Adjacent Mow Curb $10.00 $292,640.00 $4.00 $lt 7,056.00 $10.00 $292,640.00
11. 3000 SF Exposed Aggregate Paving; Adjacent Mow Curb $4.00 $12,000.00 $4.00 $12,000.00 $4.75 $t4,250.00
12. 4 EA Southern California Edison Access Gates $4,000.00 $16,000.00 $1,600.00 $6,400.00 $5,750.00 $23,000.00
13. I LS Erosion Control Plan $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00
14. I LS Environmental Compliance (SWPPP) $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00
15. It60 CY Excavation $20.00 $23,200.00 $30.00 $34,800.00
..
TOTAL $697,621.00 $683,961.20 $827,058.40
I
Page
~
~
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING DECEMBER 9, 2003
Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase IA of Ecology Construction,
Community Facilities District 2001-01 Nativ Enl!ineering, Inc. Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. 500 SF Remove PCC Drive Approach $2.00 $1,000.00 $1.00 $500.00
2. 70 LF Remove Existing Curb and Gutter $10.00 $700.00 $4.00 $280.00
3. 5 TNS Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $200.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $500.00
4. 80 LF 8" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter, per City Standard No. 104 $20.00 $1,600.00 $20.00 $ t,600.00
5. 768 SF 8" PCC Driveway Approach $10.00 $7,680.00 $5.00 $3,840.00
6. 38124 SF 4" PCC Sidewalk (including meandering sidewalk) $3.00 $lt4,372.00 $2.40 $9t,497.60
7. 10 EA PCC Wheelchair Ramp $2,000.00 $20,000.00 $600.00 $6,000.00
8. I LS Irrigation $389,563.00 $389,563.00 $270,540.40 $270,540.40
9. 35496 SF Landscaping $2.00 $70,992.00 $6.25 $221,850.00
10. 29264 SF Cobble: Adjacent Mow Curb $6.00 $175,584.00 $8.00 $234,1 t2.00
II. 3000 SF Exposed Aggregate Paving; Adjacent Mow Curb $3.00 $9,000.00 $3.50 $10,500.00
12. 4 EA Southern California Edison Access Gates $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00
13. 1 LS Erosion Control Plan $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
14. I LS Environmental Compliance (SWPPP) $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
15. 1160 CY Excavation $30001 $34,800.00 $5.00 $5,800.00
I
:
i
TOTAL $832291.00 $869,520.00
Page 2
~
01
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING DECEMBER 9, 2003
Landscaping andSidewatk in Phase lA of Los Angeles Engineering
Community Facilities District 2001-01 Marina Landsca e Inc. Inc.
UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT
NO OTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
t. 500 SF Remove PCC Drive Approach $3.50 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $2.60 $1,300.00
2. 70 LF Remove Existing Curb and Gutter $42.00 $2,940.00 $2,940.00 $13.75 $962.50
3. 5 TNS Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $615.00 $3,075.00 $3,075.00 $525.00 $2,625.00
4. 80 LF 8" PCC Cmlt & 24" Gutter, per City Standard No. 104 $35.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $23.40 $t,872.00
5. 7i)8 SF 8" PCC Driveway Approach $6.00 $4,608.00 $4,608.00 $8.70 $6,681.60
6. 38124 SF 4" PCC Sidewalk (including meandering sidewalk) $2.95 $tl2,466.00 $112,465.80 $3.78 $144,t08.72
7. to EA PCC Wheelchair Ramp $ t ,260.00 $12,600.00 $ t2,600.00 $650.00 $6,500.00
8. I IS I frigation $230,000.00 $230,000.00 $230,000.00 $210,000.00 $210,000.00
9. ;5496 SF Landscaping $5.50 $195,228.00 $195,228.00 $6.00 $212,976.00
10. 29264 SF Cobble; Adjacent Mow Curb $7.70 $225,333.00 $225,332.80 $6.65 $t94,605.60
It. 3000 SF Exposed Aggregate Paving; Adjacent Mow Curb $10.30 $30,900.00 $30,900.00 $7.10 $21,300.00
t2. 4 EA Southern California Edison Access Gates $4,560.00 $18,240.00 $18,240.00 $5,900.00 $23,600.00
13. 1 LS Erosion Control Plan $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $23,000.00 $23,000.00
14. 1 LS Envirorunental Compliance (SWPPP) $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $3,530.00 $3,530.00
15. tl60 CY Excavation $37.00 $42,920.00 $42,920.00 $40.30 $46,748.00
.. TOTAL $890640.00 $890 639.60 $899 809.42
Page 3
N
~.
Essex Construction, Inc.
BID ORRECTED
UNIT COST UNIT COST
- -
$7.00 $7.00
AMOUNT
$1,500.00
Vido Samarzich Inc.
BID ORRECTED
UNIT COST UNIT COST
$3.00 $3.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING DECEMBER 9, 2003
Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of
Community Facilities District 2001-01
NQI QTYI UNIT DESCRIPTION
1. 500 SF Rem9ve PCC Drive Approach
AMOUNT
$3,500.00
$1,050.00
$15.00
$t5.00
$210.00
$3.00
$3.00
Remove Existing Curb and Gutter
LF
70
2.
$3,500.00
$700.00
$700.00
$650.00
$130.00
$130.00
Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation)
TNS
5
3.
8" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter, per City Standard No.
LF
80
4.
04
$4,000.00
$50.00
$50.00
$3,200.00
$40.00
$40.00
$9.00
$9.00
PCC Driveway Approach
8
SF
768
5.
5,360.00
$
$20.00
$20.00
$6,9t2.00
$5.001 . $190,620.00
$1,000.00 $10,000.00
$5.00
$1,000.00
$200,151.00
$5.25
$5.25
4" PCC Sidewalk (including meandering sidewalk)
SF
6.138124
Ramp
PCC Wheelchair
EA
o
7,
$20,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
Irrigation
LS
I
8.
$180,000.00
$180,000.00
$ t 80,000.00
$135,000.00
$ t 90,000.00
$ t35,000.00
$5.35
$135,000.00
$190,000.00
Landscaping
SF
9.135496
$212,976.00
$6.00
$6.00
$248,744.00
$8.50
$8.50
68.00
$48,000.00
$351
$12.00
$16.00
$12.00
$t6.00
Cobble; Adjacent Mow Curb
SF
10.1 29264
$30,000.00
$10.00
$10.00
Exposed Aggregate Paving; Adjacent Mow Curb
SF
3000
II.
Southern California Edison Access Gates
EA
4
12.
$30,000.00
0,000.00
$20,000.00
$34,800.00
$994,550.00
$
$7,500.00
$10,000.00
$20,000.00
$30.00
$7,500.00
$1,000.00
$20,000.00
$30.00
$10,000.00
$3,500.00
$3,000.00
$17,400.00
$990,691.00
$2,500.00
$3,500.00
$3,000.00
$15.00
$2,500.00
$3,500.00
$3,000.00
$15.00
TOTAL
Erosion Control Plan
Environmental Compliance (SWPPP)
Excavation
LS
CY
LS
1160
Page 4
13.
]5.
4
N
-
-.....,1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING DECEMBER 9, 2003
Landscaping and' Sidewalk in Phase IA of Sean Malek Engineering & Valley Crest Landscape
Community Facilities District 2001-01 Construction, Inc. Development Inc.
UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT
NO IQTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. 500 SF Remove PCC Drive Approach $5.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4.10 $2,050.00
2. 70 LF Remove Existing Curb and Gutter $20.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $20.00 $1,400.00
3. 5 TNS Asphalt Concrete Pavement (including pavement preparation) $300.00 $1,500.00 $ t,500.00 $575.00 $2,875.00
4. 80 LF 8" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter, per City Standard No. t04 $50.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $35.50 $2,840.00
5. 768 SF 8" PCC Driveway Approach $10.00 $7,680.00 $7,680.00 $6.30 $4,838.40
6. 38124 SF 4" PCC Sidewalk (including meandering sidewalk) $4.00 $152,496.00 $ t 52,496.00 $3.55 $135,340.20
7. 10 riA PCC Wheelchair Ramp $t,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $320.00 $3,200.00
8. I 1.8 Irrigation $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $307,589.20 $307,589.20
9. 35496 SF Landscaping $10.00 $354,960.00 $354,960.00 $7.60 $269,769.60
10. 29264 SF Cobble; Adjacent Mow Curb $10.00 $292,640.00 $292,640.00 $14.65 $428,717.60
II. 3000 SF Exposed Aggregate Paving; Adjacent Mow Curb $8.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $7.80 $23,400.00
12. 4 EA Southern California Edison Access Gates $300.00 $12,000.00 $1,200.00 $2,500.00 $10,000.00
t3. I LS Erosion Control Plan $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
14. I LS Environmental Compliance (SWPPP) $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $9,100.00 $9,100.00
15. 1160 CY Excavation $20.00 $23,200.00 $23,200.00 $43.00 $49,880.00
TOTAL $1215876.00 $1 205,076.00 $1 254,000.00
Page 5
N
-
0()
VICINITY MAp
PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
. LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK
,. ..
WD
~~
.2/9
THE
I
RANCIIO
C I T Y 0 F
CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT (CO 04-0/?) BETWEEN SAN
BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION AND THE
PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving the Lease Agreement, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign
the Agreement.
ANALYSIS: Execution of this lease agreement is an important step toward the development of
the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail and related trailhead at the Etiwanda Railway Station.
The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan adopted by City Council identified the
Etiwanda Railway Station as a potential signature trailhead. This lease agreement is required
prior to the City constructing improvements within the railroad right-of-way and on the station
property. In lieu of monetary rent, the City shall perform all its obligations under the lease, such
as preserving the station and property maintenance. This lease agreement is also a
requirement for certain Federal and State grants, including the two grants already obtained by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga totaling over $4 million. A copy of the lease agreement is on file
with the City Clerk.
BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has joined
together with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and surrounding cities,
to develop a multi-purpose trail that would link the cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland,
Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana and Rialto. The 21-mile long rail trail would begin in downtown
Claremont and end in downtown Ria/to. The rail trail would also connect to a 6.9-mile Citrus
Regional Bikeway 'rail-with-trail' in the East San Gabriel Valley, connecting San Bernardino and
Los Angeles Counties, from Claremont to San Dimas.
The County of San Bernardino purchased the historic Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way from
the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1991, and then assigned control to the San Bernardino
~2(j
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PACIFIC ELECTRIC LEASE AGREEMENT
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Associated Governments. In 1999, Rancho Cucamonga, the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SAN BAG), and cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Fontana, and Rialto
developed the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan. The Plan archived the Pacific
Electric Railway right-of-way transportation history and developed plans for a 21-mile multi-
purpose trail linking the cities from Claremont to Rialto. The planned 'rail trail' calls for the
preservation of a 45-foot corridor with-in the right-of-way for potential future transit use and the
integration of existing transportation infrastructure including links to rail, bus, multi-modal
stations, and local and regional bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Plan also includes future
transit links and multi-modal integration, staging areas, greenway landscaping, the preservation
of historical buildings and transportation stations along the route, and the development of
historical monuments and markers to commemorate the Railway history and enhance the
project and the communities 'livability'.
The project will serve a broad transportation and recreation need in western San Bernardino
County. The project has already received funding for engineering and construction in the cities
of Rancho Cucamonga, Upland and Fontana, and has received overwhelming support from the
community. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail is a multi-jurisdictional project with support
from the seven cities located along the 21-mile route, the County, multiple advisory committees,
the CHP, local police and Sheriff's Departments, school districts, employers, transportation
agencies, the San Bernardino Associated Governments, and Caltrans.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:DC\ls
Attachment:
Draft Resolution Approving Lease Agreement
22/
RESOLUTION NO. 04- D4 2.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LEASE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
GOVERNMENTS (SAN BAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FOR THE ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION AND
THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXTENDING FROM WESTERLY TO EASTERLY CITY LIMITS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its
consideration a Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for the Etiwanda Railway Station
property located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue, along with approximately 4 acres of land,
and the entire SAN BAG right-of-way of the former Southern Pacific Baldwin Park
Branch. This right-of-way is famous as the Pacific Electric Railway that was built
through the community in the 191 Os.
WHEREAS, as the responsible agency, SANBAG, in conjunction with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga acting as the lead agency, funded and completed the preparation
of a Master Plan for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail that was adopted by this City
Council. The Master Plan identified the Etiwanda Railway Station as a potential
"signature trailhead."
WHEREAS, as the responsible agency for regional transportation planning, the
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SAN BAG) prepared a Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan 2001 Update for San Bernardino County, which seNes as the
Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail project, and
recommends said project as a highest priority project in the primary bikeway system for
the region.
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of City and SAN BAG to develop the Pacific
Electric Inland Empire Trail and supporting facilities.
WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement is required to obtain certain grant funding for,
and to develop, the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail that
will bisect the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
resolves that said Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SAN BAG) be hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
.222.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
[ ~ -. ._-----------------,
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A SUBLEASE AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS SUBLESSEE, TO ASSIGN CERTAIN
RIGHTS TO MAKE EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND CONSTRUCT AN
EMERGENCY GENERATOR ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS FOOTHILL
FAMILY SPORTS CENTER, LOCATED AT 9059 SAN BERNARDINO.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the
Sublease Agreement between the City and Redevelopment Agency to assign rights to
conduct emergency repairs and construct an emergency generator on property located at
9059 San Bernardino Road.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In 1996, the Redevelopment Agency entered into an Agreement to lease space within
Orchard Hardware Plaza, located at 9059 San Bernardino Road, for the purpose of
improving the economic vitality of a commercial shopping center through the
establishment of a community recreation center. At the time the lease was established
the commercial center had been without a major tenant (previously Gemco) for
approximately 10 years. . While the center was being maintained, commercial tenants
were struggling and there was frequent tenant turnover. The goal was to establish a
recreation center that would not only serve the community, but also act as a customer
draw to the center. Shortly after the Agency signed a Lease for a portion of the space
that had been occupied by Gemco, Orchard Supply Hardware signed a lease as well.
223
Following the completion of tenant improvements for the recreation facility, the Agency
assigned the Lease to the City for the operations of Foothill Family Sports Center.
The current lease requires the landlord to be contacted to conduct any repairs to the
roofing structure. Because of the necessity of time to correct a roof leak in order to
protect the wood floors at the facility, the Agency has asked the landlord's consideration
to amend the terms of the lease to allow the City to make emergency repairs to the roof.
The City has also requested the ability to construct an emergency generator adjacent to
the Family Sports Center to provide emergency power to the facility. The landlord has
agreed to the concept of the emergency generator, subject to submittal of final
drawings. The landlord has also agreed to reimburse the City for emergency roof
repairs conducted to the facility without requiring the prior consent of the landlord. For
non-emergency minor repair situations, the landlord has further agreed to reimburse
costs up to a cumulative maximum of $1,000 during each quarter, without requiring the
prior consent of the landlord.
The Redevelopment Agency has considered prior action on this agenda to amend the
primary lease between the Agency and MCS Straus and to assign these rights to the
City. Approval of the Sublease Amendment will authorize the Mayor to execute the
Amendment and assume the additional rights on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
~~.~
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
- 2-
22l/
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,.....:c-..c_..,,
--~,' -,.' > - -
',"-"',,,-'
-:\;:.,;~.v4K,:;/,'>1
.:_::,~"',"::ii,,-",';'I
ENGINffRING DfPARTMfNT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18,2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR
BANYAN STREET BETWEEN DA Y CREEK BOULEVARD AND
ROCHESTER A VENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Banyan Street between Day Creek Boulevard and Rochester Avenue) for the
Rancho Etiwanda Project were approved by the City Council on September 4, 2002.
225
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18,2004
Page 2
The developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in
the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
. Willi~::d
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
Z2"
~-,.--i
-.-'- .
'-'"
.-. ,. . --:
~V
... A
'Ao< ~ ""'" . .
. . sc.~.;;~ ~\:Fl7 .
______~l ~~ J~ ~"
------ fI\J ~)..p r
" /f'-.. / V-- ~ ~
_ ,-- '-+- r- .
_ _- -f- f--
-_ - - r-- Iolena~dMole
--
- --
- -~
- -'--
/ri, lilli'
II I I , I I I.
:r
II I I I
yJIIIIIIL/
/TIIIIIII\.
..,..-
.
~
.
~
e
~
o
u
..;
u
,,;
,,;
School SIle: ~
g~
~
~?
H ~ -4 F-Hl:::fJ t::
W(L-SON
"/- -"-'
f-- _::::11-
_ '-_ _-1 r-
II 11111 ./
"111111 I
-II III II
. t
.
<
:
c
n,- 11111111.
11111 111111111
:rrll
g J~I 1111111111
/" I l' I I I
" 111111111
;: <-
- ...L III1111II
I f II' r
I- -U-
~
i .
.:; .g
~ !
/T
11111111111
~
.
;;
.
,.
\.J I II I "
/ -111111 I' r
"' 1111 ./
/"/111111
'- 11111111111
=ifr
- lr][/
III\. .-
.we-IIbe
L III LLlLJ:;>
'-III mT S::
III 1111 =
ffiHHHB =
- -
-- -
Tnl r 11111
,.;
u
,,;
StTE'").
>' T V V ~ ~
( ~ANYAN <~
.A .A. .A. A A
- -~
...
..:
.
~
.
.
..
ci
U
..;
U
,,;
,,;
.
EJ~me:bllln'
Scbool Silt:
P~D:le: A~
IDh /111
/>m> _"
6Dr su......, "Y.Uy 11
~
~
o BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION
::: -=
= =
::; =
,. :0.
. '/"/.ld.~\
~]J'~~;~'Y;:i.\.
-'~ ,rc),
" }
" ,,;e;f
..
v
.
.
E
~ .....,3
..J
----~~
/lAP
NORTH 11 NTS
ITEM. Banyan Street
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
EXHIBIT: Vicinitv Map
22.7
..
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding:
Extension of Rancho Etiwanda Improvement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27,2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200 1-00 I 64,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Pennit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002-00706, ROW2002-00707, ROW2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-01013
Wilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-OI106
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-0 1333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the final cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. We anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
J:::::l ~
Project Manager
F:KcrrillcrryiEJi,,'lJIdafBabicoOlI102
Z2~
RESOLUTION NO. ()l/- 0'1 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR BANYAN STREET
BETWEEN DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER
A VENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent
to the Rancho Etiwanda Project area, generally located between Day Creek Boulevard and
Rochester A venue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Banyan Street Extension),
described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
A21
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
'"^.
^".".~.,:.:-' ;., ".,'."f~J,L~.. <,<. j
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
ill:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECf:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A: Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT VINTAGE DRIVE, BANYAN
STREET AND WILSON A VENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIW ANDA
685, LLC
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Day Creek Boulevard traffic signals at Vintage Drive, Banyan Street and Wilson
28D
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Avenue) for the Rancho Etiwanda Project were approved by the City Council on October 16,
2002.
The developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in
the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
CA<< [(vC~
w'U;; O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
25/
1
.1 ~ . 1/ 11.11 I " "
~ i . I IIIII I I II
~ ~LlIIIIII I
..; ~11I11l1I1J"-J c:::: ~
~ / III I I I Ulll;J) El.....Dt.,..,
" . III' IU 11 ,1 ..... SiL. ScbDOl ~Si";
II lUIUt .D AI:.
f- u.L i\!..t.. / IDt.
/111 \.,- ./'~.
~'/:mS""""'t"'DU' II -
I- IIII ~
111111111 = "'fR1
: ffiffHHB ~I f1 EfI___~
'1111111"1 ~
= -r::
-- r:: -
~ f- ~
1-,- "AI' ~
f- ~ E
~ffiB 'H) ~ .
.. __5~~
~
.
~
~
~
ci
u
.:
u
..
,;
WfL.'SON
SANYAN
<~
~
"C
.
~
.
.
L
ci
u
~
U
ai
,;
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
...-
.
f'>. ,.. ,.. i
-~j
':!JltS .. ---. _ rl
~~. :o~\AO' ~ ~.- ~ ~
- _________ a -ffi \ ....
/ ::;:::---" \-' ')
:-/--t-~I= ~
~ IoI~rD..:di.t"c ':..(
School SUe
i-
i/'ll, II
/111111/ iI"
J. II II II I I f I /V-;.>>~ IPJ
DlJllIllIl/ ~~ - \,g)
/11111110.. ~::>
'/--~r~i
- E= =:j:: ~E jtl:::H:::I:3{:::::
/' 11111111 "
III IIII~ :f1-~ 111111111
;: ,I
. t
.
.
:
~
II I II I I I I 1
/111111111
'''''''III
f-~ 11I1'III1L
..
.
;;
.
%
.0 . BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION
2.
NORTH It
~2..
NTS
ITEM: Tract 3 ~I&NAL.S.
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
Rancho Etiwanda'685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding: . Extension of Rancho Etiwanda Improvement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27, 2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200 1-00 164,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Permit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002~0706,ROVV2002-00707,ROVV2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-01013
Wilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-0 II 06
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-01333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the final cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. We anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
~::;J~~
Proj ect Manager
F:KerrifJerryfEli\1illldalllabieoOlllOZ
253
RESOLUTION NO. t:J4- D4'(
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT VINTAGE DRIVE,
BANYAN STREET AND WILSON A VENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way within the
Rancho Etiwanda Project area, located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard north of the 210
Freeway; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Day Creek Boulevard Traffic
Signals), described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
25,/
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
.,......",'
';"':"-:-"o.iY,,-c' j...,'..iec.d.<:....,.
<,".' .,...._;:)'"".;;.dU1;'iSi,;i"~-~<til;~"....~"'C~" "~oj
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUB,JECI':
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR
RANCHO ETIWANDA PROJECT (ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FRONTAGE
IMPROVEMENTS), LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN
STREET AND BLUEGRASS A VENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO
ETIW ANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDA nON:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
255
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18, 2004
Page 2
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Elementary School Frontage Improvements) for Rancho Etiwanda Project were
approved by the City Council on September 6,2001.
The developer, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement.
Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
. Cjf~ ?-t(~
Wilham J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
23?
~
.
..
~
..
ci
u
.:
u
.,;
.;
W fl-'Sol'J
&ANYAN
...
..:
.
..
.
.
..
ci
.;
.:
ti
.,;
.;
CITY OF
RANCHOCUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DNISION
"Y-.ti
~~
.--
.
. t
.
.
:
~
.
D
~
"E
D
U
..
.
D
.
'"
.;
ti
.;
o
BOUNDAR'? OF ANNEXATION
2S7
NORTH 'fr NTS
ITEM: Tract ~~~
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
~~ -'1---..~
-~~~
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding:
Extension of Rancho Etiwanda lmprovement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27,2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200 1-00 164,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Permit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002-00706, ROVV2002-00707, ROVV2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
. Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-01013
VVilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-01106
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-01333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the final cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. VV e anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
J,::;;L ~~
Proj ect Manager
F:K.crrilJcrryIEti",,,,,dafBabicoOl1102
..z~
RESOLUTION NO. 0 Lf- tJ L( 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIW ANDA
PROJECT AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FRONTAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way within the
Rancho Etiwanda Project area, generally located on the northwest comer of Banyan Street and
Bluegrass A venue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Elementary School Frontage),
described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be
and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement
Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
2..39
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
" ;>"' "j" 1i<'- _,.; j i-:::<i -: ~";'~"....'. '.: ;:':'<i<:>~-ij
~ -~;t.ii~;;:c.<~A)-'.<:l\J<ii'.e:id"l!!:idK;>;ii:.:J
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR
RANCHO ETIW ANDA PROJECT (STREET, STORM DRAIN AND
LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE), LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD NORTH OF 210 FREEWAY, SUBMITTED BY
RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has .entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure) for Rancho Etiwanda Project
2'(t>
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18,2004
Page 2
were approved by the City Council on January 16,2002. The developer, is requesting approval
of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement.
Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
g~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
2.Lf/
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
W((,'SON
&AN'IAN
......
..
.!:'
~
-
...
D
~
...
c:i
U
"
U
,,;
..
t
~
D
"D
"C
~
D
U
BoA CK.e.o rJ G:.
"& T/Z.~,..s. I
STDRM ,\)RAII>1~
A-N'=> L.. M. b.
..
u
oj
..
1:
.
...
.
~
...
ci
U
"
....
,,;
oj
a . BOUNDAR'!' OF ANNEXATION
---.:;;.
.-:::
.2.'12-
NORTH 11' NTS
ITEM: Tract trJ;a..4u..c.kre
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
ExHmIT: Vicinity Map
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding:
Extension of Rancho Etiwanda Improvement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27, 2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200 1-00 I 64,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Permit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002-00706,ROW2002-00707,ROW2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-0 10 13
Wilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-OII06
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-01333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the final cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. We anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
rfyou have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
d:;;Jm~~
Proj ect Manager
F:KmitJmylEtiwmdalBabico011102,
2. '1.3
RESOLUTION NO. 0 I{ - ~l./ , -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETrw ANDA
PROJECT AND THE STREET, STORM DRAIN AND
LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way within the
Rancho Etiwanda Project area, generally located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard north of
the 210 Freeway; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Street, Storm Drain and
Landscape Infrastructure), described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms
thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be
and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement
Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
,,2t/tf
L
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
<:),:'(;>;ii>:::.;..;2iJ-'{"a;r..i.j,~;:_:_),<"J';; _{'~~,{.i , ';<i':",'"';;";~',;,;;;~:; ~~_::UJ.r.....;' ~- = .~ ..."',.,,,"""''''
tNGINffRING DfPARTMfNT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECf:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR
WILSON AVENUE STORM DRAIN LINE A-I, LOCATED IN WILSON
A VENUE, EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY
RANCHO ETrw ANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Wilson Avenue Storm Drain Line A-I) for Rancho Etiwanda Project were
approved by the City Council on September 4, 2002.
2. J.fS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18, 2004
Page 2
The developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in
the City Clerk's office.
Re~ctfUlIY submitted,"
Ctl~ v(
Wil . m J. O'Neil
. City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
:2 ,,(:,
Wit-SON
BANYA N
-'-
<
~
...
"
.
~
.
.
..
ci
U
.:
U
..
,;
('pI....i
.... .,il\(
--- '" '" . .-.'
~V
~
~
.
~
o
.
...
ci
U
.:
U
..
,;
.
~ --=
_---- ____~~lifiJ
. ______ 'I\)~~'~ f
" /~ / :-- \\--
_ ,--I '---J f-
--- -- -- -
_ - _ --, --1 IalenD'Cdi.l~
_ _ - _ ---1 --l School Slle,
- ~~ --I -i
/~- -'-' -'
J: 1mB
~ FfFfHP;l ~ _ _ _
'/TT]J ~ ~ ~o. ":.."u':'
~
3E~ I '-J TI3Ef:::1 cB--
/Tm 1I'lfl t
TTTl .,,1 III1III1IIII .
-II l~:ffiffi'llll 11- ;
:rr~tlt3=IIIIIIII\lrIT I ~
~ 1lTT)'llll -; . niT :-
'E'"IITjIlIL 5 '"' ~
o '"
U /" I'll 11'1 n 11- I I In
..; "IIII!II 1/1/... e!--J, 'J
~ /TIll n IIII T'- ~ E1.mo.hn
" IIlTlI 1111 I Scbool SOl.
= III IIIII1I P~D:to ~;
:::; rl I
'-L..L lu / IDt~
... ...~f raT """-'>
V) ~ Sun1ndt .be-Dut' , I
I:: , nTT Ill:I /I
I::nT r-
~ ffiHHHB ~ a
Tmnl/I/\ .Q :>
~I ~ ";
E
, iiT ....., . ~
-~
~
~
:;
~
LINE"
A -I
o BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION
..
CITY OF
RANCHOCUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
:l. ~1
NORTH 11
'NTS
ITEM: Storm Drains
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
EXHIBIT: Vicinitv Map
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding:
Extension of Rancho Etiwanda Improvement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27,2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200 1-00 164,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Permit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002-00706, ROW2002-00707, ROW2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-01013
Wilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-01106
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-0 1333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the fmal cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. We anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
fi:::r.. ~
Proj ect Manager
":KmilJmylEtiw;wda!BllbicoOlI102
2.l1'i
RESOLUTION NO. t)J1-~ 117
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON A VENUE STORM
DRAIN LINE A-I
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way within the
Rancho Etiwanda Project area, located in Wilson A venue east of Day Creek Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Wilson Avenue Storm Drain
Line A-I), described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
;? '11
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
,.....\,
..-,,;::;'::Y''tti>O:'"'' -;.c.,,-;;';;,;,t'1
tNGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William 1. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR
WILSON A VENUE STORM DRAIN LINES "C" AND "E", LOCATED WEST
OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD IN WILSON A VENUE AND NORTH OF
TRACT 14496, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject
Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into Development Agreement
00-02 with U. C. P., Inc., for the development of 685 single-family residences in the Rancho
Etiwanda area. Under the terms of the development agreement, the master developer is
responsible for constructing "backbone" infrastructure, including the arterial and collector streets
and storm drains, all Landscape Maintenance District improvements and Day Creek Park. In
April of 2001, Development Agreement 00-02 was assigned from U. C. P., Inc., to Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, has entered into several improvement agreements for the various
aspects of the "backbone" infrastructure. All of the street and storm drain improvements are
operational, but landscape installation is still in progress. Delays in the landscape installation
were caused by field conditions that have required the redesign of several. areas. Final cap
paving on streets and cleaning of the storm drains cannot be completed until the landscaping is
done. They anticipate all improvements will be complete by the end of June 2004.
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements (Wilson A venue Storm Drain Lines C and E) for Rancho Etiwanda Project were
approved by the City Council on September 4, 2002.
2S/)
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 18,2004
Page 2
The developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in
the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted, _
w5}!-J;jl(~
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
.2.Sj
LINE
E.
LINe
C.
ST:
C,t/)!. ~ IN(;
---
.
(
~
.
D-
~
D-
[
.... (
<
L...
~
"'
.
D-
o
.
..
.;
.-
"
<>
..
.;
!>.- - --
_ ;t\; ·
.. .. .. . .-'
fY
o BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION
--
~
... '00< ~ [( .
(.of"C' ..---- .
-- s c.... .---.:-\ / .J. PltC
. ~ ~\f:l ~; )~}J"f)l
~ :D~~:: W
_-= ~~ f- ,,~
- --
-_ - -_ - - IDl--'C:di.\~
- -- - ---
_ _ _ _.-, --I Scb_' SIte
- -1~ ----I --I
j1_ A
,,;;;,::; ,:.- ~ ..~- ::>
I-JI- .LL\/
>- I-- >- ' J.-L.:::(}-
I- L-I- L.L..J. r- L.LJ t-
V -11/1 II II11
lrn IIILl.~ IIII
~
~
:
u ~ ,III II ~ . 1'11,
~ ~ '\.1111111 IlL 5 " "
U / TI I III I I
.. " lilT 11111 U ~ / r::::i-;J. "-
~ /TTTI'IIII".!':
'- 11111111111
=~IIIIIT
- ~ln/
I ... I
aJl A..~n..'C: .
7W TL .I
~i._ ~
~fHHHHB~
I- >-
i:: f=
,""~~III
gm .
= ..
NAP v
- ~
TIn .~
, IIII "'J {]
.. -.;:-~~
.;
u
"
u
..
0;
~
.
a
.
"
De-meDlary
Scbool Sileo
PO;: ~te ~
bote
"""~
If S......., "eDue II
t
-18
'1,Q C>
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WILSDN
BANyAN
NORT~IT~S
ITEM: Storm Drains
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
2392 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 777-4058 Fax (949) 777-4258
January 27, 2004
Betty Miller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Regarding:
Extension of Rancho Etiwanda Improvement Agreements
Dear Betty:
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC would like to request the extension of the improvement agreements
related to the following improvements as outlined in your letter of October 27,2003.
University Elementary School Frontage, Permit number ROW200l-00164,
Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure, Permit numbers ROW2002-00705, ROW
2002-00706, ROW2002-00707, ROW2002-01395,
Banyan Storm Drain (adjacent to park), ROW2002-00417,
Wilson Storm Drain Line A-I, ROW2002-00882
Banyan Street Extension, ROW2002-01013
Wilson Storm Drains C&E, ROW2002-O II 06
Day Creek Traffic Signals, ROW2002-01333
The extension is necessary due to the fact that we have been unable to place the final cap on
many of the streets due to delays in the landscape installation caused by field conditions that have
required the redesign of several areas. We anticipate that the improvements will be complete by
the end of June 2004.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (949) 777-4058.
Sincerely,
J,:::;:r.. Jw~
Proj ect Manager
F:KerrilJerryfEliw;w<WB;tbico021101
.253
RESOLUTION NO. Otf - /) /{g
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON A VENUE STORM
DRAIN LINES "C" AND "E"
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 18, 2004, by
Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way within the
Rancho Etiwanda Project area, located east of Day Creek Boulevard in Wilson Avenue and north
of Tract 14496; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements (Wilson Avenue Storm Drain
Lines C and E), described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to
be done in conjunction with the development of said Rancho Etiwanda Project; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement
Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
2.S,!
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
be; IN n"';bc"f:"N c" U EP ~:H:"TME N T
.<:~.. v,;,..:',", i "i>J"" ""<hi
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECI':
February 18,2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE CASH
DEPOSIT, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15278, LOCATED ON THE
6133 ARClITBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Parcel Map 15278 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Cash
Deposit and accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of PM 15278, located on the 6133 Archibald Avenue, the
applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed
and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Cash Deposit
and accept the Maintenance Cash Deposit.
Developer:
Release:
Accept:
Plaza Developments
Faithful Performance Cash Deposit
Maintenance Cash Deposit
$3,400.00
$ 340.00
Respectfully submitted,
C(jxC/?Ay-U'
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:KT:dlw
Attachments
.2. SS
."
tl' #
I..Jl ~
Ii ..
I;. i,
~. .
J"'i 8
ill~
iI.'
t~
. ~ ~
~
~~__--1
......... ...,~~~.. ~
~I----]--TISUB~ECT'~<S
r--~-. . I .' ~\I\
I :=""-: I SITe. ?-7..!' \SCALC ::50'
:~ ~i---I ~':'::.";':'I
f.: I::' .\ I ~
...: !)~!J I ~lo
lV, I: ",>, >'!)
t!:~' 1?
~ ,pA;J~.3!. .4/j,p ilt). ~t)~
. .....olI...,~ ~HJ
rn.. paW!
.,." \ I
,.pr_u.,JolU
KJI__".III.\..... I I I:=-~':: -J 1__1
JI "Y 11 r I 1-"1 ...
1'" !J \ I 1 I' f----1 ~ ...\ '" ~
I "" --I ~.-1-- ::r4!)9~ s I J h I ~ ~
I I UBERTY COURT .1>!)' r ~. _ i I ~ ~
:UJ [ ~:) 1- II ~ ~~
~I /A~-jl' ~- I i Ilg!I~~
~I- --- I I ~, . ~! V I ~ ~
II HI", I .. I ~ . L ~ L_
I I I UBERTY STREET ' ~=
--E- _LfMQfi A I.9IUE
!~
i~ '
po...,
_Jtl!!
.
"
~
~
v-tis'
I
~-
\-~-
",..-
, I
JI
C~.C.~."O,.
o -.-...-.,..
.~ y ~....,
{~~'$~'f
...~ '~. ..
0, .. ....,., -
>u...-::;' ..
... rei ~
u _. ---
1977
../
(..,.
~)
,....,....r.IOlZPlI<<
---
_ U-~.
C'~ ......__.______
trll ........._..."".....-.....,.-*1&.-
(fW_7tr1:
- (
~-
_ ___<l!!!!P
_.'~"'.1J""''' ~-~
tnz.H7 dU.1I4'> ".,. ,"P'_ ".. .......:..
u,"fIOI._ ~ - "I ~
,___'-VJt '....1
f(Nn'Z'OIIJ"C56S.NJ) /IIn'Utll-c ~"71~.'5''''E sasJl'). I. ~ t:t
I I ",.0
~'& =~
iJ.4/ ilt). ~ f- - --:-'\~~
....4/.., 'l1JJVS I . ~\I~I
.l i\.l\_~~
~:) -
.}Jt);J:t')t)il !); !.!):t' ~!J
>;.-""
I :i: ~Z
1M i~
G.~ . \l
I~-. ~,.,
rtijD-i,- ...
I ~ "",'
"1:\
~ .
---h~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi'\'IONGA
title;
^
N
.flUS Z. i 8
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
page 2..5'
RESOLUTION NO. o'l-~tf1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15278 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 15278 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
.157
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
(.1- , <:.-,-. ,- ~ ,. " ;;.;:'- -ur:.. -/>,.;-S:,-., ,-:'i.-
- __,:~./^;;;;'ft:' ;;<<~>,;<.\?, ~'<G:.r"'';;;';k'@1
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE CASH DEPOSIT, AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16037,
LOCATED AT 8585 COMET STREET, SUBMITTED BY JOSE AND
GRACE JIMENEZ
RECOMMENDATION
The required improvements for Parcel Map 16037 have been completed in an
acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said
improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file aNotice of Completion and authorize
the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit.
BACKGROUND! ANALYSIS
As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 16037, located at 8585 Comet
Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements
have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Jose and Grace Jimenez
Release: Faithful Performance Cash Deposit
$3,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
C(fe {///{ JJJ
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
.:z5~
Vicinity Map
UJJ LlCJ
LLJ
[[OJ]
I I ,
-
ARR"1W
," 0- r I
0-
\
- E=
- :;;
;==
- 1;;:;;
,-- - l.-
I/A OJ"<
I I I IIIII\\\>
- v I
"-
~ f
~ -
== ~ [
" ~
[rnl
rnrnrnl
9Tt-
I /I 1
-
r--
r-- ( -
IT
PM 16037
8585 COMET ST.
:l. 51
RESOLUTION NO. 01./- tJ50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16037 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 16037 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and
file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
2.(P{)
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
c=.:.~~--:------:~-~:c'-~-::--
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
-----,,--=-=:;;J
Staff Report
DATE:
ID:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECf:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
ACCEPT LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2, SUBMITTED BY
RC HOMES, LLC, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MILLER AVENUE
BETWEEN ETIW ANDA AND EAST A VENUES
RECOMMENDA nON:
The landscape improvements for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2 have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance
Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, located on the south side of
Miller A venue between Etiwanda and East A venues, the applicant was required to complete landscape
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council
release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer:
Release:
Accept:
RC Homes, LLC
Faithful Performance Bond
Maintenance Bond
BE2616307
BE2616337
$620,500.00
$ 62,050.00
Respectfully submitted,
W~N,f1(Af
City Engineer
WJO:BM:hh
Attachment
ZiP/
~
;:% //
./
~
/
k
/'
NORTH ft NTS
2(,2
ITEM: Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2
TITLE: Vicinity Map
CITY OF
RANCHOCUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
RESOLUTION NO. ()L/-~.5/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND
15711-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of landscape improvements for Tracts 15711-1 and
15711-2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and
file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
2(,3
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
,o~ ;,':
. _;" 0-_, _,_._,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECf:
RfJruary 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15914,
SUBMITTED BY EHR 22, LLC, LOCATED ON BIRDSONG PLACE OFF OF HIDDEN
FARM ROAD, SOUTH OF ALMOND, WEST OF HERMOSA A VENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 15914 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15914, located on Birdsong Place off of Hidden
Farm Road, south of Almond, West of Hermosa Avenue, the applicant was required to complete
street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer:
Release:
EHR 22, LLC
Bond No.
Faithful Performance Bond 8343645
$47,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
~e(/l1vUf"
Wilham J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:
Attachment
2~1
AW&OI'I.D
i-lIPnw
FAit~
HILLSIDE ST.
WILSON
PROJECT
LOCATION
BANYON ST.
..:
LEMON '" AVE.
t;; ..: ~ iii
'" ~
HIGH v.i AVE.
~
. 19TH ST.
?i ...
'"
::; >- >-
'" a: ~
~ w
. m w
... BASELINE ?i ROAD
~
:E:
:l
w
:I:
FOOTHILL
o
cl
m
:;:
...
~
i ~
15 :
:I:
BLVD.
66
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
ENGINEERING
DIVISION
Item: Staff Report
Title: Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT 1: Tract 15914
.:l.tS
RESOLUTION NO. OJ.! - {) 5 2..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15914 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15914 have been completed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves,
that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of
Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
.2 ,,~
RANCHO cUcAMONGA
i'NCrI'{7t.8mr~ J"t~liXUR~P~---~
Staff Report
DAlE:
February 18, 2004
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:
ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16334, SUBMITTED BY RICHMOND AMERICAN
HOMES, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND
THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 16334 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and.
accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16334,Iocated on the east side of Rochester Avenue,
north of Base Line Road, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Richmond American Homes
2191 5th Street Su ite 105
Norco, CA 92860
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond
$ 367,200.00
Accept:
Maintenance Bond
$ 36,720.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neilft(;11~~ l (
City Engineer I
(
:1.~1
III
I-fGI.UN:) A'IE.
9"SEI..IIE ICOAD
I?I<O-ECT LOCA~
FOOll-LL a.vo
~
<l:
~
~
Ar<ROW ROUTE
!
II I
4T1-1511<l%1
~
N
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ITEM:
TrrLE=J//C/N/TYMAP
ENG.1NEERING DIVISION
2t,~
RESOLUTION NO. otf-t>6.3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16334 A AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16334 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County.
2ft,1
RANCHO cUcAMONGA
tJ.:., i.~ /":,.'t.~'..:.:.Y.:r '
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
;,'" ".....~. ;"f,..
'~. ,~';;'/.iiJ
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
James T. Harris, Associate Engineer;.+-l'...
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn'tClan ~
SUBJECT:
RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6120873 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $24,245.00, FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN
STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 02-032
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful
Performance Bond No. 6120873 in the amount of $24,245.00 for the Modification of Traffic
Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg
Avenue, Contract No. 02-032.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: New West Signal
14055 Foothill Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
R~Z~~
Wil~ O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JTH/RO:ls
Attachments
2.7D
" '.".>'"
BNHIW
,,_, I I I I , , I I I U'
7n rETPM~ ~
~ II f'7/?l
1/1 a,~DR \
\ 7/1 '7
H. _ SHLDHCT ' J/
I/'~ 7
~ ~ WO<SBLRGCW
.~lml T7
v::f:1--. 1
7OXC7\.
I
.,.::~-'-~<.._-~.~ :
Project " " "
Location.'
~.
~-I~ -
~ =1'... \. ~,... ::
l ~~Et~
n= -J:
I I n \"' ,'l-fi-
~~~
"
, ,\ \ \ /1~\ ~
u:-~ ~7 _ 't.
--/ \, ,Y/~L~~
S:i~ -
- ~Ill--
= c, r '--
:J2~ ~ ..::
~~ :--l,--
=~1-- I U) ~
= ~l:~_
F$-, :"" \. ~ ~
~ V/NTAGEDR
(1111111111 R
Figure "A"
. ~
(N)
Banyan at Fredericksburg
: '. Traffic Signal '
Modification Project
Net b.....
:2.7/
~bylk:ibM.I'ater:i.2s..2CXl2
RANCHO
i
cue A M 0 N G A
,.-..-.,....>.....,
"'.J.):'.l..-)'-',--" ..
,'..'--''''-'''',
,.~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
February 18, 2004
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
James T. Harris, Associate Enginee~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechnJt!ian~
RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6120872 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $33,737.00, FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF
CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, CONTRACT
NO. 02-033
BY:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful
Performance Bond No. 6120872 in the amount of $33,737.00 for the Modification of Traffic
Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande
Streets, Contract No. 02-033.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: New West Signal
14055 Foothill Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
Respectfully submitted, A Il
cw {y/A J-~
WiIIi~~ O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JTH/RO:Is
Attachments
;2.72
- OIIJ tr
ijl
IAlDt
~ III
-- ~~>-
33 ~>-. "\...
. ........... ~<..
- ~- tf--
I '-It
I I / -~;;z.... I - - I-
" 1\ i \ "'-v '-
~- ~
~ \ 1 I !.....J ... ~ ~~I
~\.- I R~ ~....
-} --irr 1 I I 1 I I \ \
u_
l\l
- I I II~
- ~- ......
- -
- D -
-
- i I i 1=
"" I-
.....
.....
~ I--
l-
I.-
"ect
Location
ItNrA ::.
n _r-n
Figure. "A"
Carnelian, LaVine and
. LaGrande Traffic Signal
Project
(N)
...To.....
:2.73
....,.....~DDlP...fbn.r....'t-2DOO
RANCHO
cue A MaN G A
J ':< 2;'~Xi;i:'. ',,: '.><i<".{:.,"<!c
.. ,
""'/(.~, L'" .. -';"7\,>/;,\\1'",0]
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer t.P~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician-#J/)
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, CONTRACT NO. 03-
045 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A
GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $59,001.20
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Contract
No. 03-045, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain
the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of
the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $49,300.00 six rnonths after the recordation
of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in
the amount of $5,900.12, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount
of $59,001.20.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Heritage Park Storage Shed scope of work consisted of constructing a storage shed
(Building "C" of City Drawing 1771) and the installation of a salvaged chain link fence at the
front of the new shed. All work was done at Heritage Park. Pertinent information of the
project is as follows:
:2.7'1
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Accept Heritage Park Storage Shed Project
February 18, 2004
Page 2
)- Account Number:
)- Engineer's Estimate:
)- City Council's Approval to Advertise:
)- Publish dates for local paper:
)- Bid Opening:
)- Contract Award Date:
)- Low Bidder:
)- Contract Amount:
)- 10% Contingency:
)- Final Contract Amount:
)- Difference in Contract Amount:
11203055650/1207120-0
$40,355.20
Wednesday, April 2, 2003
April 10 and 24, 2003
May 13, 2003
June 4, 2003
Roc-Loc
$49,306.20
$4,930.62
$59,001.20
$9,695.00 (19.66%) Increase due to
additional roofing
During construction, staff was informed by the Roc-Loc the exact color of the existing
building roof could no longer be produced by the manufacturer. Engineering, Facilities, and
Community Services staff agreed that while close in colors, the roof on the new section of
the building would be noticeably different than that of the existing building's roof. Roc-Loc
removed the existing tiles and returned them to the City for use as future tile replacements
on various City maintenance buildings that have similar tiles. City Council concurred with
staff's decision to replace the existing tiles and additional funds required for this change
order were appropriated through previous City Council action at the September 17, 2003
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
c;)eOt1~-
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WS/RO:ls
Attachments
J..7S
RESOLUTION NO. OI./-tJstf
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, CONTRACT NO. 03-
045 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Contract No. 03-045, has
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
.l7fc
~\i.~~:{,
!1i*'~N
l;;~j~,!~.~<,~"
"
--f'
",,'
i
~~~ii~,~
"f~~~~r'~l~
.. "'.,,. .4 <:}
\!':::'",:.
~.~t\ !~):
~;''\t''p.;
F"~lt~~:~~:'!
.~.,,, ,.':-
';1~)Th~t~
1j<.l>;ll;."
fl'~~:l"~~!
'--.'
i:
iMi""':
',;,;,
~';'~
~, "'$~
,..,.,
it
i,,~,'~i;j'l
q." "';I,
I'. l.\i'"'l
...",...:, '."
;lfJ:~" (~r'o
"...~,... ......
.' "I~""
i:'~"' r!! :'l'~:R~
.",r.~"i";':r,.~;~,.' ~:.
~;~.l~"i' -,~'~;;W'
}~:~IE;I";~
.tfl~lf?1 ~~~
.','- .;,~..;.1t',; ,,~.'
~
'"
'-l
RANCHO CUCAMON'GA
ENGINEEDING DEPADTHENT
. 8~-:ffReport
DATE:
TO:
FROIV'.:
BY:
SUBJECT:
September 17, 2003
Mayor and Members of the City Council.'
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ..
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer~
APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER #1 FOR THE AMOUNT
OF $9,695, AND TO APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF $9,700 TO
ACCOUNT NO. 11203055650/1207120-0 FOR THE HERITAGE PARK
STORAGE SHED PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:
- .
Approval of contract change order #1 for the amount of $9,695 and authorize the City
Engineer to sign said change order, and to approve an appropriation of $9,700 to
Account No. 11203055650/1207120-0 for the Heritage Park Storage Shed project.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
. .
The Heritage Park Storage Shed project is constructing an extension to an existing City
maintenance building. The shed will cover a portion of the facilities compound used for
the storage of large equipment used for the maintenance of Heritage Park. Previously
this equipment has been exposed to the weather thus requiring additional staff attention
and maintenance. The new storage shed will attach to the existing maintenance
building and will have a roof integral with that of the existing building.
During construction of the shed the roof tile manufacturer informed our contractor they
no longer manufacture 'that tile in the exact color specifications of the existing building's
roof. As such the two roofs will not match. While the colors will be close, they will still
. be noticeably different In discussions witl1 City facilities staff they believe the difference
in ccilor would be too noticeable and would cause the structure to look odd.
.
The City periodically must replace tiles on various maintenance buildings that have a
similar type of tile, and these removed tiles could be used for those replacements. Jf
approved, the old tiles from the existing building will be removed and stored by the City
;1..78
'. Y COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
o'IERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED PROJECT
September 17, 2003
.Page 2
to be used as necessary on various maint;?nance buildings throughout the City. The
existing building and new storage shed wi!! tnen receive a roof that matches.
. Originally $65,000 was earmarked for this storage shed project. The storage shed
project was contracted at approximately $50,000. With the addition of the nearly
$10,000 for the re-roof the total cost for the entire project is still within the $65,000
earmarked.
Respectfully submitted, _. I
- c;ye /[/L ~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:ws
cJ. 79
c=-....
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
f, .
. ..-~., Fi
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE:
February 18, 2004
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ./
:>/
Cindy Hackett, Associate EngineeP.<'j'.;')
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~
ACCEPT THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 6TH
STREET TO 7TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-101 AS COMPLETE, ACCEPT A
MAINTENANCE BOND AND RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $137,242.57
BY:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from
6th Street to 7'h Street, Contract No. 03-101, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond and release the Faithful Performance Bond,
authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $142,934.68 six months
after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $13,724.26, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract
amount of $137,242.57.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 6th Street to 7'h Street scope of work consisted
of cold planning, crack sealing, asphalt rubber overlay, signal loop replacement, striping, pavement
markings and signing. Pertinent informalion of the project is as follows:
~ Budgeted Amount:
~ Account Numbers:
~ Engineer's Estimate:
$551,000.00 (4th to 7th)
11243035650/1252124-0 & 11763035650/1252176-0
$189,499.20 (6th to 7'h)
:2.~O
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: ACCEPT MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
February 18, 2004
Page 2
>- City Council's Approval to Advertise: August 6, 2003
>- Publish dates for local paper: August 12 & 26, 2003
>- Bid Opening: September 2, 2003
>- Contract Award Date: September 17, 2003
>- Low Bidder: RJ. Noble Company
>- Contract Amount: $142,934.68
>- 10% Contingency: $14,293.47
>- Final Contract Amount: $137,242.57
>- Difference in Contract Amount: -$5,692.11 (3.98%) (savings)
The original budgeted project was to improve Milliken Avenue from 4th Street to 7th Street which
included widening of the street north of 4th Street. At the start of design it was discovered that three
different developers were in the process of developing vacant parcels along the stretch between 4th
Street and 6th Street. The project's scope was reduced and when development is complete, the City
will finish the improvements on Milliken Avenue.
During the pre-construction meeting, the contractor and staff negotiated at the contractor's request
to eliminate the crushed aggregate base by substituting with additional asphalt concrete. The
additional asphalt concrete made it possible for the contractor to reduce the cost per ton of the
asphalt concrete charged to the City. This substitution along with the quantity of manhole frames
and covers being reduced by 4 each are the cost savings that make up the difference between the
conlract award amount and the final contract amount.
Respectfully submitted.
:il~:::!V~~
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:ls
Attachments
2<t1
VICINITY
~~~--,,= !i! ~
---- r I' Ii I '~~
I; ~ 1>:/ Ii f !l
I" _"~Df: If ,: ~'! ~;ig~; Ji ;:-t=t;;;'~
. ~ J~~;~~"7-'-~~=~"- 0
, ~ ~f~~-i ~:: ~r i !i ~-
. =. a.~~~!AH " JiL:l\=~~ _,I ;__=.=---
I:I ~f l""~ l "'=-"-1 -"
=~~~NL~_.~_~~~~, j
~I J!il l'li~:- Ii i: 11
Ii Ii. ,I ~L~t1I~,~-,~~~_~~~,,_,
I 1 ~ 1'" il ,~#.
-~~-(SRJO-L:'1"...:ST. ,: _.j,,~,=, ~T/'
~, .ONrr.~' ST. Ii :i'""'t\l~'~';:;.~i i. Ili
.-"="'~~! jl li-<=O-;:~i; :!~, W)
~;! I; n' ~:
c;' ~ II (, ~:I Q:1 ' BASE UNE ROAD
., '-i';'~"< ---',':' -:..........<.,,~...:.""~.':---- ._.="''--..c-<..=",-=---...:c...-::._c,.....e:-..,--
a ~'.' .. .. ,; q , i . 5" PKwr ~
~ q f ::l.. ..,.' I '" .-"",., -'i!i"-
. z:: '7 f j ~ : aiURa-I ST. , 4/v \; i!
~t: ==-='I~!f" c:ir'--' ~" l ~
, 5 ", . 8\-- . L_ -
" SAM BERNARDINO RD' ~,<! _ . '-;.__.,,:
'~r:-TJi --~_ O:i'''i~-=I '~1im~~~~~' ~ (SRBB)
Ii I ;:~. ROUlE '" ~cci~c-ia.iER';' ~
~i !' -1" -l. ,- - -;, 1='''''='''''= ~"
.ERSEY BLVD;
MAP
~
Ii
~
~
-<
"
c==.~-:"""
.,"'...
B~'!:~_.,5J_.,....
/:
f" .
. :: I!(,..,_~SRJO)T~UHD '~AS;
UPLAND
z
.'
a
r- ~r- -~i'---j .~ 8~~':';
'----.-----." --. ----"--- - - <, ..-
I:: q' ~~,
l:i!' ~,
) 19_ __ ~L___ '8~~_
=--=,=,"-.- --~---i'l - T-- ~ - - .-'--.---- ,
.7!,..~
ill n
11---
~ SPRR
~
-<
~
~
0:
., i n
~ ~_ _~UROf
15
,.
-<
" -
iE
Ii
~ ~L
_. _.. Ii __ _ _..
!ONTARrO i '~'.
1-10 FREEWAY
PROJECT SITE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MIWKEN AVENUE
(FRail 6TH STREET TO 7TH STREET)
PAVEMENT REllABD.lTATION
\lCTDRl.
~
-<
~
~
~
15
!l
'"
'MfITTRMI AVE
,
RESOLUTION NO. 01{- t>6S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
6TH STREET TO 7TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-101
AND AUTHORIZING THE FlUNG OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 6th Street
to 7th Street, Contract No. 03-101, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
2~8
THE CITY OF
r.= -=-=--~=:::=-=::=:=-=-_-~ ::--- ::--:::..= --===:===--=:1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 - LEWIS
EAGLE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a change of exterior
building material for a 25,622 square foot warehouse in the Industrial Distict (Subarea 13)
on a 1.25 acre site, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 0229-283-02.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request to change exterior
material from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete, thus upholding the decision of the
Planning Commission and Design'Review Committee.
ANALYSIS: The project was originally approved by the City Planner on March 17, 2003. The applicant's
request to change the exterior building material from Travertine stone to sandblasted concrete was
denied by the Design Review Committee on November 4, 2003, and subsequently appealed by the
applicant. The Planning Commission unanimously denied the appeal on January 14, 2004. A complete
chronology and analysis of the applicant's request to change material is contained in the attached staff
report dated January 14, 2004. The Planning Commission reaffirmed the offer of the Design Review
Committee to consider alternative materials of similar quality as Travertine stone; however, the applicant
has so far declined to propose alternatives. The appeal letter to the City Council filed by the applicant
provides no new information that was not already considered during the Planning Commission meeting.
BB:EW\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Applicant's Letter of Appeal dated January 23, 2004
Exhibit "B": Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 14, 2004
Exhibit "C" - Minutes from the January 14, 2004 Planning Commission Hearing
Draft Resolution of Denial for DRC2002-00116
2<t'f
EAGLE PROPERTIES
Commercial and Industrial
Real Estate Development
1161 EAST WALNUT STREET
CARSON, CALIFORNIA 90746
(310) 537-6190. FAX (310) 604-4880
January 23, 2004
-'
0>:,-"(;:" _
.. ;.'-.,,\....r. .."IF':; .-,
-t~
IJAN 262004
CITY 0f H~NCHO-" ,.
CI1Y CLE~C^:,:v:'\.:l"
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729-0807
Attn.: City Clerk
Re: Development Review DRC2002-00116
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am a principal of Eagle Family Limited Partnership (the Partnership),
owner of real property located at 9275 Charles Smith Rd., Rancho Cucamonga (APN:
229-283-02). The Design Review Committee (the "DRC") has approved architectural
plans providing for construction by the Partnership of an industrial building on the
above property (the Project).
By this letter, the Partnership is appealing, to the City Council, the
Planning Commission's denial of the Partnership's request for modification of that
approval (which request will be described below). The Planning Commission' s.denial
is reflected in Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-15 (the Resolution). A copy of
the Resolution is attached to this letter as Attachment 1, Enclosed for purposes of this
appeal is a check, made payable to the City, in the sum of $126.00.
\
:, On January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission denied the Partnership's
request thaUhe foregoing approval be modified such that sand-blasted concrete could
be used on portions of the proposed building's exterior, instead of travertine as
originally approved by the DRC (the Request).1 To put matters in perspective, the
portion of the front exterior that would be covered with travertine (or, if the Request is
granted, sand-blasted concrete) comprises only approximately 30% of the building's
front (the side facing Charles Smith Rd.).
Initially, we want to point out that Paragraph 3 of the Resolution contains
overbroad and imprecise language implying, in essence, that the Project as a whole is
1 The Request came before the Planning Commission, on January 14, 2004, on
an appeal by the Partnership of the DRC' s denial of the Request on November 4,
2003.
~th\bi-\. "A"
2<lS
City Council
P.2
January 23, 2004
not in compliance with or consistent with the applicable provisions of the Development
Code and General Plan. I am concerned that this language could be read to mean
that, on January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission reconsidered the overall merits of
the Project and rescinded the DRC' s previous approval of the Project in its entirety,
when, in reality, the Planning Commission stated that this was not the case. In fact, the
Planning Commission took pains to clarify, on the record, that the one and only issue
before it was whether or not that approval should be modified as per the Request, and
that the prior approval of the Project would stand regardless of whether or not the
Planning Commission approved the Request. To that end, during the January 14, 2004
hearing, the Planning Commission handed the Partnership's representative, Stephan
A. Mills, Esq., a proposed version of the Resolution with modifications intended to
make the foregoing more apparent. A copy of the proposed version is attached to this
letter as Attachment 2. For reasons unknown to me, the final version of the Resolution
does not contain the clarified language.
I also note that the Resolution as adopted says that the Request was
denied without prejudice to allow the Partnership to "refile with alternate materials
similar to Travertine stone." Obviously, if the Planning Commission had purported to
rescind approval of the Project in its entirety, it would not have left the door open to
future requests for modification of that approval. Nevertheless, to the extent, if any, that
the Planning Commission purports to have rescinded that approval, or to have
considered or ruled on any matters other than the Request (which was the one and
only matter pertaining to the Project before the Planning Commission on January 14,
2004), the Partnership appeals its decision in that regard.
The Partnership set out its grounds for appeal of the DRC' s denial of the
Request in a letter, dated November 13, 2003, a copy of which is attached to this letter
as Attachment 3. The grounds set out in that letter also apply to the Planning
Commission's denial of the Request. As noted in that letter, the DRC failed to give the.
Partnership notice of the November 4, 2003 hearing in which it denied the Request,2
However, one of the main thrusts of our presentation (at the January 14, 2004 hearing)
was that sand-blasted concrete, as an exterior material, fully complies with the City' s
Development Code and Design Guidelines, because it is compatible with surroundinl,l.,
land use and architecture. Many other buildings in the area already use that material ,
and it has proved to provide a visually attractive, high-quality, durable finish. Sand-
blasted concrete is specifically listed in the Development Code as a proper primary
building material for industrial buildings. Section 17.30.060(J).
2 At the January 14, 2003 hearing, I affirmed that this was the case, as did the
project architect, Richard Kartozian. The project engineer, Jack Nazarian, submitted a
declaration to that effect.
3 At the January 14, 2004 hearing, we presented the Planning Commission with
two folders full of color pictures of other buildings in the City that use sand-blasted
concrete as an exterior element. We also submitted a map showing projects that have
been approved near the Project which would use sand-blasted concrete.
~~6
City Council
P.4
January 23, 2004
Nevertheless, the Resolution says (at para. 2(b)) that the Request is
contrary to the intent of the Development Code and General Design Guidelines
because sand-blasted concrete "is an exterior building material that is commonly used
in the industrial area; whereas, the Travertine stone is a unique design material that is
rare in the industrial area." First of all, use of a material that is specifically approved by
the Development Code cannot be contrary to its letter or spirit. Secondly, the
Resolution implicitly acknowledges that DRC has approved many other sand-blasted
concrete buildings. It would be most arbitrary for the Planning Commission to use the
Project to declare sand-blasted concrete persona non grata in the City. One would
expect the City to welcome the use of a tried and true material as an exterior accent
element.
The Resolution also cites (at para. 2(b)) General Design Guidelines,
Section 17.30.060.J.7, which requires the "creative use of building materials." We
strongly disagree with the implication in the Resolution that sand-blasted concrete
cannot be used creatively. First of all, Section 17.30.060.J.7 states that at least two
primary building materials must be used, and specifically approves sand-blasted
concrete. Travertine is not even mentioned by name.
Secondly, "creative" does not mean "unique." Nevertheless, the
Resolution tries to equate the two, as if the only way to build creatively is to abandon
tried and true materials specifically approved by the Code B like sand-blasted concrete
B in favor of materials that are rarely used. If each developer who came into the City
was forced to use materials not used in prior approved projects, construction in the City
would become progressively more difficult and expensive, and ultimately be choked off
altogether.
Finally, the Project is both creative and unique, and its visual appeal does
not in any way depend on the use of travertine. With the aid of a three-dimensional
model, Messrs. Mills and Kartozian pointed out, at the January 14, 2004 hearing, that
the Project building, with or without travertine, would have many unique features. For
instance, the proposed building, as previously approved by the DRC, would have an
interesting geometric shape, in that comers at the rear of the building would be
eliminated. According to the approved plans, there would also be wing-like projections
from the sides of the building and recessed truck bays. Hence the proposed building
would not have the rectangular box shape commonly used on industrial buildings.
The proposed building's other unique features, as per the approved
plans, would include a large expanse of window glass on the second story of the rear
exterior.
Even if sand-blasted concrete is used in place of travertine, the foregoing
unique features would increase the cost of constructing the building by approximately
30%. For instance, steel beams and bridge-like construction would be required where
portions of the second story extend over recessed truck bays. In short, the Project is
proof that being "creative" does not depend on using uncommon building materials.
2g7
City Council
P.5
January 23, 2004
Please bring this appeal on for hearing as soon as possible, since the
Partnership suffers financial loss each and every day that construction continues to be
delayed.
Let me paraphrase something I stated in my previous appeal letter
(Attachment 3), because it is just as applicable to this appeal. I have worked hard to
make sure that the proposed building will have aesthetic appeal. I take pride in the fact
that the building, if constructed, would serve to enhance the community, both visually
and economically. I regret the necessity of having to initiate this and the prior appeal,
but I am confident that, once the City Council has the opportunity to hear and consider
my presentation, it will be persuaded to grant our request. We look forward to working
with the City to make this project an unqualified success.
?:::~. br'~
Lewis Eagle
2. <l'J
~ H E
C I T Y
o F
RANCIIO CUCAMONGA
_~_J
Staff Report
DATE: January 14, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP - An appeal of a Design Review Committee decision denying a
request to change an exterior building material for a 25,622 square foot warehouse on
1.25 acre of land in the Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at 9275 Charles Smith
Avenue - APN: 0229-283-02.
BACKGROUND/CHRONOLOGY: The original application was deemed complete by the City on July
8, 2002. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on three separate
occasions:
[( tl
!3
.
August 6, 2002 - Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) recommended
conditional approval, particularly the use of Solar gray glass. The applicant's original
design that was approved included exterior materials consisting of Travertine stone and
painted concrete tilt-up walls with recessed horizontal bands with textured paint to match
the color of the Travertine stone. The Travertine stone was used as the second primary
building material and was featured on the office entrances and corners of the building
facing Charles Smith Avenue. The rear elevation, facing the 1-15 Freeway, featured
painted concrete tilt-up walls, with closely spaced horizontal reveals, that were painted to
match the color of the Travertine stone.
.
October 1, 2002 - The Committee continued this project because the applicant was unable
to attend the meeting. The item had been rescheduled because the applicant wanted to
change the glazing from Solar gray to clear glass. Staff recommended denial because it
could lead to window displays and illegal signs.
.
November 5, 2002 - The Committee (Mannerino, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the
applicant's request to use clear glass. The Committee recommended denial.
.
March 17, 2003 - The City Planner approved the application with a condition requiring
opaque or reflective glass.
c?fJ'/uY
2.f/9
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00116-Lewis Eagle
January 14, 2004
Page 2
. September 18, 2003 - The applicant contacted staff to discuss a revision to the exterior of
the building. It was explained to the applicant any change of a main architectural material
must be approved by the Design Review Committee.
. October 14, 2003 - The applicant was placed on the DRC agenda to propose the change
of Travertine stone to spliHaced block. On the same day, the applicant withdrew the
proposal to review his options (Exhibit "A").
· October 22, 2003 - The applicant met with staff to propose changing from Travertine stone
to heavy sandblasted concrete. Staff supported the proposed change because it was
consistent with primary material guidelines of Development Code Section 17.30.060.J.7
and other buildings in the area. Staff told the applicant that his request would be docketed
on the November 4, 2003, agenda.
· November 4, 2003 - The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) denied the proposed
change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete; however, stated they would
consider alternate materials similar to Travertine stone. The Committee felt that the heavy
sandblasted concrete was not of equivalent quality to the Travertine stone. The applicant
did not attend.
. November 13, 2003 - Applicant filed an appeal (Exhibit "C") claiming that he was never
notified of the November 4, 2003, DRC meeting and his belief that heavy sandblasted
concrete is appropriate. One week prior to the meeting, the applicant, and his engineer,
were notified of the meeting by City's letter dated October 27, 2003. (Exhibit "D"). Staff
had already verbally notified the applicant during a meeting with him on October 22, 2003.
The applicant has not submitted any alternative materials.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request to change
exterior material from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete, thus upholding the decision of
the Design Review Committee.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:EW\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Applicant's Letter of Withdrawal from the October 14, 2003, DRC
Meeting
Exhibit "B" DRC Action Minutes dated November 4, 2003
Exhibit "C" Applicant's Letter of Appeal dated November 13, 2003
Exhibit "D" DRC Agenda Notification Letter October 27, 2003
Exhibit "E" Site Plan
Exhibit "F" Approved Elevations (with Travertine stone)
Draft Resolution of Denial
2'16
October 14,2003
Emily Wimer
Dear Emily,
.
.
EAGLE PROPERTIES
Commercial and Industrial
Real Estate Development
1161 EASTWALNlITSTREET
CARSON, CALIFORNIA 90746
. (310) 53N1190 . FAX (310) 6O~ ~880
...;-;~
r-
. J,t
14-
Y'1i)yO
<-, C'~
'r~ / -I r'4%
'c;,Yh <I ~ 04'&
. '() ...V~ '4
'~4,
~~t/t~
This is to infOl'lll you that I wish to cancel the planned meeting with the Planni"g Review
Committee scheduled for tonight.
The reason is because I w8nt to re-evaluate my options"
Please let me know who I may see to pick up the material submitted to you in the event
that you are oot available.
E.~n'~* ,\~.
Hl/Hl"d 00817 1709 mr
.
~
~II:lJ.NO:)-~ldW3
:2.QI
a0:11 ~00e-171-1JO
.
.
CONSENT CALENDER COMMENTS
7:10p.m.
Emily Wimer
November 4, 2003
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 - EAGLE
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - A request to develop a 25,622 square foot warehouse in
Industrial District, Subarea 13 on a 1.25 acre site, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue -
APN: 229-283-02.
Desion Parameters: The project is located on the east side of Charles Smith Road on.
approximately 1.25 acres of vacant land. The project is bordered to the east by the 1-15 freeway, to
the south by Cardlock filling station, and to the north by an industrial warehouse building. The
building is a 25,622 square foot speculative warehouse and includes a 5,104 square foot
mezzanine.
The applicant has asked to modity the approved exterior building materials. The original material,
travertine stone, was approved by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission in
October of 2002. Since the approval, the applicant has submitted plans, which would change the
exterior materials of the building. Staff informed the applicant that the change would require Design
Review Committee approval.
The applicant is proposing the second primary exterior material, travertine Stone, be replaced with
heavy sandblasted concrete. The sandblasted concrete would be used mainly along the west
elevation facing Charles Smith Avenue, and wrap around the ends 28 feet. The majority of the
building is painted tilt-up concrete and features horizontal bands of solar gray glass. The proposal
will change the exterior look of the building on all four elevations. The proposed change would also
affect the horizontal bands on the exterior of the building, which wrap around the entirety of the
building. The original color proposed matched the tan travertine stone. The proposed split-face
block would change the horizontal reveals to a gray hue similar to the painted concrete of original
design. Sandblasted concrete is a commonly used primary building material on other buildings in the
neighborhood. Renderings and sample of sandblasted concrete will be available at the meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the request.
Desion Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart and Nancy Fong
Staff Planner
Emily Wimer
The Committee did not approve the proposed material of heavy sandblasted concrete. The
Committee stated they are open to review other material similar to travertine stone.
'1"
;2.q2..
.
.
EAGLE PROPERTIES
Commercial and Industrial
Real Estate DEWelopment
1161 EAST WALNUT Sl'REET
CARSON, CAUFORNIAlllI746
(310) 537011190 . FAX (311l1604-<18llO
November 13, 2003
Planning Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
A~1:zl..: _P'~"";"9' r:evi_ CQIlllII1~t:ee
lie; 9275 Ch.iar1es SlIlith lld.., ~....,.1oI0 Cuoamonqa
(APR: 229"283-02)
Dear Sir or Madam;
I am a principal of Eagle Family Limited Partnership
(the partnership), owner of the above-referenced property. As
per architectural plans previously approved by the Design Review
Conmcittee (the ORC), the partnership has proposed to build an
industrial building on the above property.
By this letter, the Partnership is appealing to the
Planning Division the ORC~s denial of its request for approval
of the use of sand-blasted concrete on portions of the proposed
building=s exterior, instead of travertine stone as originally
approved. Enclosed.for that purpose is a check, made payable to
the City, in the sum of $62.00.
I first learned of the DRC=s denial of our request in a
November 10, 2003 e-mail I received from assistant planner Emily
Wimer. In that e-mail, Ms. Wimer informed me that the DRC had
reached the foregoing decision on November 4, 2003. This means
that the Partnership did not get the full ten-ds y ap:;>eal. pe riod
that is supposed to be allotted after denials.
Neither Ms. Wimer..s e-mail, nor the DRC~s "Collsent
Calendar Comments" (the comments) for November 4 cite any
specific reasons why the ORC denied our request and overruled the
recommendations of its staff, so I can only speak to the issue
generally. Sand-blasted concrete, as an exterior material, fully
complies with the CitY"'s Development Code and Design Guide:'_ines,
because it is compatible with surrounding land use and
architecture. Many other buildings in the area already use that
. .C"
~'" 'It, \0,",,"
.;2.1.3
.
.
Planning Division
Page 2
November 13, 2003
material, and it has proved to provide a visually attractive,
high-quality. durable finish. Sand-blasted concrete is
specifically listed in the Development Code as a proper primary
building material for industrial buildings. Section
17.30.060(J).
There is a factual error in the Comments which I need
to address. The Comments say that the "proposed split-face bl.~c~
would change the horizontal reveals to a gray hue similar to the
painted concrete of original design." This is incorrect.
Neither the original plans nor the request for modification
proposed the use of split-face block, which produces a rough-
textured exterior surface. Sand-blasted concrete, by contrast,
provides a fairly smooth surface. The error reflec~ed, in the
Comments might indicate that the DRC misunderstood ~he change
that we requested.
Had I been present on November 4, I could have
corrected any misapprehensions. But I never received advance
notice from the ORe that our request was on its agenda that day.
Due to the very short time given us to appeal, I have not had a
full chance to review the Development Code, but it does look like
we should have gotten advance notice. Acco~ding to Section
17.02.070, any request fo~ a change in conditions of approval is
to be considered a "major revision," and all majer revisions are
to be processed through the same approval procedure and authority
which granted the original approval. Section
17.06.010(E)describes the original approval process. Xt ~aY9
that, after a completed application is accepted for design
review, the project shall be set on the first available agenda
for committee reviews and that the applicant, among others, is to
be notified at least ten days prior to the meetings.
Please bring this appeal on for hearing as soon as
pOSSible, since the partnership suffers financial loss each and
every day that construction continues to be delayed. !~s_ Wimer
told me that the first available date is January 14, 2004. If at
all possible. I ask that you move this hearing date up.
Also, please give me the DRCms specific grounds for
denying the modification request so that I can participate more
meaningfully in the appeal.
I have worked hard to make sure that the proposec building will
have visual appeal. I take pride in the fact that the building.
if constructed, would serve to enhance the community, both
aesthetically and economically. I regret the necessity of ha~Ting
to initiate this appeal. but I am confident that, once the
planning Division has the opportunity to hear and consider my
~q~
Planning Division
Page 2
November 13, 2003
.
.
presentation, it will be persuaded to grant our req.lest. We look
forward to working with the City to make this project an
unqualified success.
Im'nCI;.NIP .DOl:
~y you<s.
r..i. ".l~
;;Jlb
~o'
i~
.
Mayor
WIWAM J. ALExANDER
Mayor Pro Tem
DIANE WIWAMS
Coundlmnnb01
REx GlTTIERREZ
ROBEIIT J. HOWDYSHElL
DONALD J. KURTII, M.D.
City Manag<r
JACK LAM, AIep
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
October 27,2003
Eagle Family Limited Partnership
1161 E. Walnut Street
Carson, CA 90746
Dear Applicant
Your project, DRC2002-00116, has been scheduled to be reviewed at the following dates and times.
To assure the successful completion of your project, your partiCipation at these meetings is
requested. The meetings are held at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center
Drive (2 v.. miles north of the 1-10 Freeway at Haven Avenue).
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITIEE: November 4. 2003. @ 7:10 D.m.
These qommittees are an essential part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Development Review
Process. The Committee's review allows major development issues and technical problems to be
addressed prior to Planning Commission. This process is described fully in 'The Development
Review Process' guidebook available in the Planning Division.
A copy of staff's comments to the Design Review Committee are attached. Please review these
comments and develop appropriate responses. In order to expedite the process, applicants
are encouraged to resolve these Issues at the staff level prior to .committee review. whenever
possible. It is expected that the applicant will come prepared with revised plans or sketches
to show the Committee which address the attached comments.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Emily Wimer at (909) 477-2750,
Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
DC:EW\ma
Attachment
.). q {:.
10500 Civic Cen,e, Dr. . P.O. Box 807 . Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9tn9-Q807 . Td 909-477-2700 . Fax 909-477-2849 . www.ci.rancho>-cucamonga.ca.us
(l!)
-IE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'500 Civic Cente:r DriVe
), Box 807 . Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729-0807
HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
1500 Civic Cente:r Drive:
J. Box 807 . Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91n9-0807
.,
..
Eagle Family Limited Partnership
1161 E. Walnut Street
Carson, CA 90746
Richard Cartozian
Nazarian Engineering
24254 Hawthone
Torrance, CA
.
rJ.q7
INTERSTA TE 15 R/W ~
~
~
..- ....- -
- -
7 r:l l
~). I
- I ~~ I
-
-
~ I
,
~ ,
i
.
~, -
. -iro~'//1:~
- - ,
---
.' .
~ . I --..;; ~~ ITmUlTITl ~
--
~r -,
=II I ~lllillllWJ lW1J 1
=31 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DIST. SUB AREA i.J
:31 I I
dl ~ ~
=11 ~ I I ~
~ ~
=31 Il:l Il:l
~ ~
:31 I::: I I ~~
~
::jl ~~
c::jl I I
~ . GENERAL INDUSTRIAL D1S1
.
\REA 13
--
""
-! I
~
~
~
Il:l
~
i::::
~
8
~r r I r
. U L J \
I
!)USTRIAL DIST. SUB AREA 13
L . LWl
.
,,:"'.... (.hT" 01......1,. ~f'tlol~,.... I
..,y.... "~T ""'''''''" ~rl" .......11.',. .~--
"~;,.. or:." :.;;:.~~ ."';.';.r ::"~;~:~7~N
r;:.::tf~ ':;f:'~".::;.;f~?;""'~;~"f.J;.~~~:"
, ,
=
-
,
::..::..r:.1""...:::r';.,......;r:.,l-:.j.".~' ,.,..,,,,.,,.. "'...........,......../".1'.
fI("""'''
fr-r:.r:.W^Y. el-r..,I/I,fIIN (~"')(""'''r)
?.."..r: ",~., ,..
11)-
lilt
..
'''ff
-',
!:,..
.~-
1'7..,........
-
,---,......P
-.
--
-'-'
/
~'r-:'''rT''
'@
,
,
::~~====-= -~~
:t",.::ttr~"" ~r iH~
)(gl.-lMoNt,\ppf<wal
Il"....lgn_~
".~. _.e::a.
~...atc:~
,., "--..,
- ----__J
----....;.
""^"^"f<AI..'H"i,,,,...,...,..,.,.,.r
14.,. "'1'l._0I ,.. "....,..,1J....
,....ur-r.......1.
.
Mezarlen Engineering
---
2.'" __... -. hilM"
""._..c..........
,1~"lu..nH.f..:'llftl''''1
1I1!>~I"'OIM r-r TrI~ e..w~ ..""""',....,.
;:~~.t~.y,h'::_,:':~~ C~.
ed1~
~
:::8
.
.
"''''f'(f#./, ?u fy'f r........
"'...."'f"' .,.."., ..~""' f"r'M"" /
,.".."'~.,..'" 11..,.....001.,......... ?f""(". Woof" 1"l(T~t"'"..P ,..", .,.....r.. "".,"'...,
1r....v..,..1'..~ f1r'......... ''''''''1 ,..-.. MM'''''' ,..1-.; "'~ f~"l!rf"'l!- 1I'r'Ir'\'"
~:::"~--:i_~'o..,_--_'-, ---- -6.6__ _ _. L__.~ _-.-_...:.___-:.:_____.;] ./'.
"'--- ~ -
. .
q.
~ ; \ - "
" .".....c:::::.--_. -"_._ \ :~ .. '~"~"
. . .... "'"
I ----';, .--" -==....:....;-.
.., ". J_ _m.! .. .................100"
I 'I I'
WA__"'Y \1
i v~(' "" 1" ,",,:"l1.r w..._w~"".."" "-.,.""",,..
"'.....~,... "-r-- ,.......1,.".
....~"f""~ (I........ '.......r.r.". 9v("U" .............. f' -1"'" rr...."lf.rf'N,. l.Ir ~""'I>l. (H'r-_t:>
'....'..1'''.. 1" .......r..ot 1i....v-rT..... '....,Nl.'" .,. """1''''''' 1,....
".......t"'" """""r
",iJ1'~ ~~Y"'1'''.
,.......It .r.'.. ."".
56",,+V\ Be\Ja;t\M
---
NfS
~
~
~
~r"',w """,""r. .,,,~ ("ur ,_I'l. '1,,,,-,,,," ..,..,.y ".,,~ 1i,."",,,,,
l'-1l".!J.Il" H'r1f."..f....'" '>1rl'-"") W11" 1~,J!"'1!'
''''''''1. l' -1"'! ""I'Wr-'f 1/'7\'V~"'_ 1"1"-'1'" f~.."'M'.....1'Y'"
-.:.-:..~..~ - .:;~~~;C:~,;,~i~~ ~ ~~:.:::.:.:'~~_ .:;..:;.;::~~I..=~---="" -~ _!-_J
""'r- ~'Y''''
~-,.....----_....._--..........
f"r
(I"'~,,~
\T\
x.
'S"
-.
~
,..
1-
.,.,
..
...
-
-
-
-
-'
/' 7~r-.J ~
"'1Mfll'"l'W*~. \
./
,/ WAl-t/.WAY A.HP "JJ""'tlr-""'"
1""10-'" "r ...'API.... o...t "'''0 "4>~
....."'.."': ''''1'''1" r, - ~ 1/"1'1.... IN....
"'-'-I">"M/'
No r+k E I tV a- 1i fN\
N1S
.
"
-
.\
\
.'~"r_1_ """1<.. ,,,.....1'''',. fJ~'r--"" WAJo.'"
,......,"'"f..." l' 'W\"f.toi fr.....v"'"r tl'l'"
---
...., .'y' ~~"' V
..-,;.;p'Il" - """."'1'"
l' -f' 1 v"rr'NIlI
.
~
~
'f 1!>.ll,,,O'Il""Mj.oJ,..
'"1' 'I' ''5'#,. ,.,.~"'"
"'~...,.lfJI~f1'y.....J,.,
r""'.r"'" pr'Mo"') "
,"-,"IJ"""''''~ rf,.;,.,"...1....... ">(f'.(__ ....,1'It ~A1'''~''
'''''''f fo _1Hf '''''''.'''f r,.,...YIiI"'IHfl .(Irl"ll-<
.
""'r Vl04_ &1'Y'HP
'.'.:. /..:~
"-'... .. , s!:;;,-
.. ", l ,
- - . _. ". ___J.. .... _
", _...
"- , - , , --
:~-~\: ., " '", ..
" , :~
.. e'".' --',
"
--. ' ,L
. I . : .. .,.". "."
, "
. \ ..
.. , , .- '0 ' - '-
,,:'>...'-.. '.". ," - , ,
I T1 I .. , -.t-
.. :;/-II .;.,
.- !:i-I
I . ..
I," ..
-'. ..
..
#J,......,.~)f..."-
/
/
t,
( W~~iJ
r'
'N
"I'
r.......fU' ""-"JIoP ""H"rJl.1',,. 11'('''........
.
6tlz..a7T t: I ew-.-h'M
Nf6
~
~
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the resolution approving Development
Review DRC2003-00782. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
*****
P. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW DRC2002-00116 - EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - An appeal of a Design
Review Committee decision denying a request to change an exterior building material for a
25,622 square foot warehouse on 1.25 acre of land in the Industrial District (Subarea 13),
located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 0229-283-02.
Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. She noted that on Page 16, paragraphs
2-3b and 3c, a correction on the draft resolution was suggested to replace the word "use" with
"project. "
Chairman Macias opened the public hearing.
Steve Mills, an attomey, indicated he represented the applicant. Mr. Mills noted the word revision
and asked what effect it might have on the approval of the project.
Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that he had received a call from Mr. Eagle questioning the
original wording shown as "use." Mr. Buller commented that he agreed with Mr. Eagle that the issue
at hand does not pertain to the use but instead refers to the project review; therefore, the wording
was changed at his request. Mr. Buller clarified that the question before the Commission deals only
with the material proposed for the exterior of the building, not the merits of the project.
Using a 3-dimensional model, Mr. Mills pointed out the areas of the building where the exterior
material would be used (either the travertine or sand blasted concrete). He noted the areas include
the comers of the building and the area framing the doorway. He commented that the sides and
back of the building were never planned to have any travertine other than the comer wraps.
Commissioner Fletcher asked if the rest of the building is proposed as painted concrete.
Mr. Mills indicated it is. He noted the Development Code indicates that sand blasted concrete is an
approved building material. He stated the building is not substandard and that their intent is not just
to cut comers. He said the structure is not a basic box and that it features 45-degree angles and not
standard comers alone. He noted that this would require extra footings and therefore extra expense.
He added that they are using a more expensive type of spandrel glass opposed to the typical glass
with mullion surrounds. He believed the building is visually appealing from Charles Smith Road and
the freeway. He said they (the applicant, architect, and project engineer) did not receive notice of
the November 4 Design Review Committee date. He reported that the consent calendar comments
from the November 4 Design Review Committee meeting incorrectly indicate that the applicant is
proposing to use split face block and that would significantly change the design. He clarified that
they are not proposing to use split face block. He stated they did not attend the November 4 Design
Review Committee meeting because they did not receive notice of the meeting and they feel they are
at a disadvantage and have to rely on the staff report for the reason for the denial. He stated that his
architect would present samples of sandblasted concrete. He added that many industrial buildings in
the City use this material on their exterior. Mr. Mills then presented a portfolio of photographs of
buildings in the City that use sandblasted concrete.
Richard Cartozian, Nazarian Engineering, 24254 Hawthome Avenue, Torrance, presented a sample
of the proposed sandblasted concrete. He commented that the building will be expensive to
.,
\l Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 14, 2004
C :2/;i~Y
.J()..;
construct because of the large expanse of spandrel glass and the angled side. He said the freeway
side of the building has been enhanced and that it is exquisite on its own.
Commissioner Stewart asked if, in spite of the missed notification of the November 4 meeting, the
applicant had not been informed that the Design Review Committee indicated it would be willing to
look at and consider other materials to replace the travertine.
Mr. Cartozian responded that it was suggested that they could think about using split faced concrete.
He felt block would not be in keeping with the rest of the building because it appears jointed. He said
the sandblasted concrete would have another aggregate material added to it to make it "pop out" in
appearance and yet would not appear jointed. He felt that would complement the type of glass they
.are using.
She asked if another slate or tile could be used.
Mr. Cartozian said it would still look jointed. He believed the materials they have chosen will
complement each other with the design of the building. He felt that the way the comers are handled
is very important.
Commissioner Fletcher asked if what was being shown tonight is the original sample board
presented to the Design Review Committee.
Mr. Cartozian reported that it is, but they have an agreement with staff to bring in a chip and get an
approval from staff when it comes time to paint. He indicated that the travertine shown is not exactly
the one they would have chosen.
Mr. Mills asked that a declaration from Jack Nazarian, (project engineer) stating that he had not
received notice of the November 4, 2003, Design Review Committee meeting be included in the
record .
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, reported he did not receive the notice because of an incorrect suite
number and a missing zip code.
Mr. Mills then supplied a diagram prepared by Mr. Eagle indicating adjacent buildings to the
proposed building that have used sandblasted concrete. He stated that the cost to build the building
as proposed with the sandblasted concrete is already 30 percent more than the average building.
He believed the draft resolution is contrary to the Development Code because the material
(sandblasted concrete) is sanctioned by the Code as a primary material. He queried how a material
already provided for and approved by the Code could be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the
Code. He reiterated that many buildings have used this exterior and it is commonly used. He
commented staff pointed to the section of the Development Code (17 .30.60.J. 7), which requires the
creative use of building materials. He believed you should not have to use a material that has never
or rarely been used before (i.e. travertine) in order to be creative. He felt they are proposing the use
of a common material in a creative manner and that the Code does not require the use of a unique
material.
Chairman Macias closed the public hearing and asked the Commissioners for their comments.
Commissioner McNiel stated that a year and a half ago, he and Ms. Stewart met with the applicant
for their first Design Review. He noted that at that meeting, the applicant was adamant about two
items, the color of the building (green) and that he wanted to present a building to the City that is
unique and the use of the travertine stone would make it unique. He noted that this is what the
applicant requested and this is what the Committee approved. He commented that the building was
sold to the Committee on the basis of the use of the travertine, the color, and at a later meeting, the
glass. He remarked that the travertine was a selling point of the building and this is the key issue.
Planning Commission Minutes
-10-
January 14, 2004
.J6'1
Commissioner McPhail commented that the City does not favor tilt-up type concrete boxes and
although this building is not exactly a box because of the 45 degree angles, the travertine feature is
what keeps it from looking like a concrete tilt-up type building. She preferred the contrast that would
be provided by the travertine and the green over the look or the color combination of the gray with
the green now being proposed by the applicant. She added that she could not support their proposal
because it does not enhance the building and that she is unwilling to set a basis/precedent, which
would say that we would allow a tilt-up concrete type of structure.
Commissioner Stewart concurred with the other commissioners. She commented that this building
kept coming back to the Design Review Committee and each time the applicant "chipped away" at
what was proposed as the design. She remarked that initially there was passionate discussion about
travertine and adamant discussion about the color. She added that the use of the travertine offsets
the entrance to the office portion of the building, which is an element that the Committee favors with
this type of building because it helps people to know where the entrance is. She noted that in the
Committee they stated they would not be open to sandblasted concrete, but that they were open to
altemate materials and that she is still open to other suggestions. She commented that the angles
help to enhance the building, but that they do not make the building particularly unique. She noted
that some of the photographs provided by the applicant as examples using sandblasted concrete
feature other unique aspects to the design such as a highly articulated entry, artwork, pop outs,
architectural features, and roof variations. She maintained her pOSition to not support the use of
sandblasted concrete in place of the travertine.
Commissioner Fletcher commented that he reviewed the history of the project. He noted that part of
their job as a Commission is not just to maintain what is happening in the City, but also to enhance
the development of the City. He commented that no one questions the durability of sandblasted
concrete and that it is a common material. He felt the sample shown earlier in the evening looks like
a stepping stone. He added that he agrees that some added enhancement is needed and that what
was now being presented looks like an "all cement tilt-up building." He concurred with the Design
Review Committee's original decision.
Chairman Macias reported that he read the report and the supporting documentation. He concurred
with Commissioner Stewart that the photographs of other buildings using sandblasted concrete
clearly have better articulated architecture and are no comparison, for the most part, to the one being
presented by the applicant. He added that the photographed projects have other enhancements not
being provided by this applicant. He asked the City attomey, to clarify the ramifications of either a
"yes" or "no" vote on the project.
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey, reported that a "yes" vote would approve staffs
recommendation to deny the request for the change and would maintain travertine as the approved
material and deny the applicant's request for sandblasted concrete. He pointed out that the Code
section referred to by the applicant that lists the creative use of building materials as primary
materials also notes that these materials are used subject to approval by the Design Review
Committee. He added that Section 17.06.010 3.d directs the Committee to consider texture and
color as well.
Mr. Buller commented that even if the Commission were to deny the request, the applicant still would
have the option to come back to the Design Review Committee with alternate material proposals for
consideration.
Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by McNiel, to support staffs recommendation and to adopt
the resolution denying the applicant's request to use sandblasted concrete. Motion carried by the
fOllowing vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
Planning Commission Minutes
-11-
January 14, 2004
J/)5
RESOLUTION NO. t)t.j-t>5~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE REQUEST TO CHANGE
EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS FROM TRAVERTINE STONE TO
HEAVY SANDBLASTED CONCRETE FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2002-00116, A 25,622 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATED AT 9275
CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 0229-283-02.
A. Recitals.
1. On March 17, 2003, the City Planner conditionally approved Development Review
DRC2002-00116. The development plans, stamped and signed "City Planner Approval," specified
Travertine stone and painted concrete tilt up walls with recessed horizontal bands with textured paint
to match the color of the Travertine stone.
2. Lewis Eagle filed an application to modify the approved exterior building materials for
Development Review DRC2002-00116, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject modification request is referred to as "the application."
3. On November 4, 2003, the Design Review Committee, a subcommittee of this Planning
Commission, considered the applicant's request to change the materials. The Committee denied
the request on the basis that the proposed heavy sandblasted concrete was not of equivalent quality
as the Travertine stone. The Committee indicated they were willing to consider other materials
similar to Travertine stone. The applicant did not attend the meeting.
4. The decision of the Design Review Committee was timely appealed to the Planning
Commission.
5. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's
request to change materials. The Planning Commission denied the request on the basis the
proposed heavy sandblasted concrete was not of equivalent quality as the Travertine stone.
6. The decision of the Planning Commission was timely appealed to this City Council on
January 23, 2004.
7. On February 18, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
..j t;~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE
February 18, 2004
Page 2
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting on February 18, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Council
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application proposes to change the second primary exterior building material
from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete on the west, north, and south elevations. The
building is designed with painted concrete tilt up walls with recessed horizontal bands with textured
paint to match the color of the Travertine stone; and
b. The application to change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is
contrary to the intent of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter
17.30 Industrial Districts, Section 17.30.060. General Design Guidelines, Subsection 17.30.060.J.7.
Architecture and Design, to require "creative use of building materials" because Sandblasted
concrete is an exterior building material that is commonly used in the industrial area; whereas, the
Travertine stone is a unique design material that is rare in the industrial area. On the approved
development plans, the Travertine stone is the exterior material prominently featured on the office
entrances and corners of the building facing Charles Smith Avenue; and
c. The application to change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is
contrary to the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Community Design Policy
6.4.1.8 to "continue to implement and update, as necessary, our City's comprehensive design
guidelines for residential, commercial, and industrial development."
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed project is not in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed project is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
Council hereby denies the application without prejudice to refile with alternate materials similar to
Travertine stone.
5. This Council hereby provides notice to Lewis Eagle that the time within which judicial
review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions
of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return-receipt requested, to Lewis Eagle at the address identified in City records.
3()7
THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L _____ _.______ _________ _ __ _ ___
Staff Report
DATE: February 18, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: Approval of an Ordinance providing a one-year extension to the time limit
on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit to repay
indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33354.6 or Article 12, and arnending the Redevelopment
Plan to provide no time limit on the establishment of loans, advances and
indebtedness paid from the Redevelopment Agency's Low and Moderate
Income Housing fund or establishing additional debt in order to fulfill the
Agency's affordable housing obligations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the above Ordinance providing certain
amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In 2003, Senate Bill 1045 became effective which required all redevelopment agencies
during the 2003-04 fiscal year to make a payment to their respective counties
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). The payment is due in May 2004
and the cost to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is approximately $2.1
million. Senate Bill 1045 also contained a provision for legislative bodies of pre-1993
Redevelopment Agencies to adopt an Ordinance during the 2003-04 fiscal year that
would extend certain time limits for one year. This time limit extension pertains to the
effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness and
receive property taxes. Under normal circumstances, California Redevelopment Law
requires legislative bodies to negotiate agreements with taxing entities and perform
certain public review prior to amendments to a Redeveloprnent Plan. As part of the
ERAF shift from Redevelopment Agencies in FY 2003-04, Senate Bill 1045 contains a
3~~
provIsion that a one-lime extension can be accomplished through adoption of an
Ordinance without requiring the need for fiscal review and discussions with taxing
entities.
Also, effective January 1, 2004, Assembly Bill 1731 amended Health and Safety Code
Section 33333.6 to provide legislative bodies of pre-1993 Redevelopment Plans the
ability to amend the Redevelopment Plan to remove time limits on the establishment of
loans, advances and indebtedness paid from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund or the establishment of more debt in order to fulfill the Agency's
affordable housing obligations. This amendment can also be made without affecting
existing pass-through agreements with taxing entities.
Through adoption of the attached Ordinance the date the effectiveness of the
Redevelopment Plan will be extended by one year to December 23, 2022 and the time
limit to pay date or receive property taxes will be extended by one year to December 23,
2032. Additionally, the Ordinance will remove time limits pertaining to expenditures
from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to comply with housing obligations.
Respectfully submitted,
~ g(), ~
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
- 2-
$6q
ORDINANCE NO. 7),/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 33333.6
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the
"City Council"), adopted Ordinance No. 166 on December 23, 1981 approving and
adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project (the "Project");
and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 316A,
approving and adopting Amendment NO.1 to the Redevelopment Plan (the redevelopment
plan for the Project, as amended by Amendment No.1, is referred to herein as the
"Redevelopment Plan"); and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 537,
establishing certain time limitations with respect to the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has
been designated as the official redevelopment agency in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
carry out the functions and requirements of the California Community Redevelopment
Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the Redevelopment
Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 33681.9, which was added to the Health and Safety Code by
Senate Bill 1045 and which took effect on September 1, 2003, requires the Agency during
the 2003-04 fiscal year to make a payment for deposit in San Bernardino County's
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund; and
WHEREAS, with respect to redevelopment plans adopted on or before
December 31, 1993, Section 33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code was amended by
Senate Bill 1045 to provide that when a redevelopment agency is required to make a
payment pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33681.9 the legislative body may
amend the redevelopment plan to extend by one year the time limit on the effectiveness of
the redevelopment plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness or receive property taxes
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 by adoption of an ordinance, without
the necessity of compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 33354.6 or Article 12
(commencing with Health and Safety Code Section 33450) or any other provision of the
California Redevelopment Law related to the amendment of redevelopment plans,
including, but not limited to, the requirement to make the payment to affected taxing
entities required by Health and Safety Code Section 33607.7; and
WHEREAS, with respect to redevelopment plans adopted on or before December
31, 1993, Section 33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code was amended by Assembly Bill
1731, effective January 1,2004, to provide that the legislative body may amend the
redevelopment plan to provide that there shall be no time limit on the establishment of
loans, advances and indebtedness paid from the redevelopment agency's Low and
11231-0001\760404vl
31D
Moderate Income Housing Fund or establishing more debt in order to fulfill the agency's
affordable housing obligations, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Health
and Safety Code Section 33333.8 by adoption of an ordinance, without the necessity of
compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 33354.6 or Article 12 or any other
provision of the California Redevelopment Law related to the amendment of
redevelopment plans, including, but not limited to, the requirement to make the payment
to affected taxing entities required by Health and Safety Code Section 33607.7; and
WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council desire that the Redevelopment Plan
be amended to extend by one year the time limit on the effectiveness of the
Redevelopment Plan and the limit to repay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant
to the Health and Safety Code Section 33670 and to provide that there shall be no time
limit on the establishment of loans, advances and indebtedness paid from the Agency's
Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund or establishing more debt in order to fulfill the
Agency's affordable housing obligations, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of
Health and Safety Code Section 33333.8 .
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)(C),
December 23, 2022 is hereby established as the date upon which the effectiveness of the
Redevelopment Plan shall be deemed to be terminated.
Section 2. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)(C),
except as provided in Health and Safety Code subsections 33333.6(g) and (h), December
23, 2032 is hereby established as the latest date on which the Agency shall pay
indebtedness related to its activities or receive property taxes from the Project pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33670.
Section 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(3)(B),
notwithstanding any provision of the Redevelopment Plan to the contrary, it is hereby
established that here shall be no time limit on the establishment of loans, advances and
indebtedness paid from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund or
establishing more debt in order to fulfill the Agency's affordable housing obligations, as
defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.8.
Section 4. Except as amended by this Ordinance, the Redevelopment Plan is
unchanged and is in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Section 5. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, for any reason, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance and this City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance if such invalid
or unconstitutional portion thereof had been deleted.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and is
hereby directed to publish or post this Ordinance in accordance with law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
the following vote:
II231-0001\760404vl
day of
, 2004, by
.3//
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
I 1231-0001\760404vl
dl2-
-
~:
RANCHO cUcAMONGA
I
BUILDING AND SAFETY
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
February 11 , 2004
Mayor and Members of City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official ,y
Mark D. Salazar, Code Enforcement superviSO~
APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$193,554.00 AWARDED BY THE STATE OF CALIF RNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (CEGP) INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1244000-
4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE
$155,800.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1244302-5604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY _
VEHICLES), $17,950.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1244302-5605 (CAPITAL
OUTLAY - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), $ 4,200.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO.
1244302-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - CAMERA EQUIPMENT), $5,620.00 INTO
ACCOUNT NO. 1244302-5285 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - SAFETY GEAR AND
EQUIPMENT), $1,200.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1244302-5200 (CAPITAL
OUTLAY - OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE), $8,784.00 INTO ACCOUNT
NO. 1244302-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) FOR TOTAL GRANT
EXPENDITURES OF $193,554.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the acceptance of a $193,554.00 grant
awarded by the Department of Housing and Community Development for the Code
Enforcement Grant Program (CEGP) into account no. 1244000-4740 and approve the purchase
of various equipment and contract services to improve current staff equipment, services to the
community and staff safety. Items over $20,000.00 will meet with the approval of Council in the
future, prior to purchase. The grant is 100% funding with no matchina funds reauired.
BACKGROUND
On February 27, 2003, the Building and Safety Department received notice of the availability of
$4,750,000.00 in funding for code enforcement programs from the Department of Housing and
Community Development.
The CEGP is a new program with the aim of making grant funds available to cities and counties
for capital expenditures only that improve the effectiveness of and supplement existing local
3/3
\,
funding for code enforcement programs related to housing code maintenance or compliance.
The grant money cannot be used for staff resources in the Code Enforcement Program. To be
eligible, applicants must demonstrate the intent to ensure cooperative and effective working
relationships between code enforcement officials, local prosecutorial agencies, local health
department, local building and planning departments, policing agencies, local housing agencies
or other agencies participating in any interdisciplinary approach to housing code enforcement.
The funding is designed to support staff and resources and to improve and preserve existing
housing through community-oriented code enforcement efforts for a period of three years. The
CEGP was awarded on a competitive basis. The State received 139 eligible applications
requesting just under $20,000,000, and approximately 30 cities were awarded grant funds.
Rancho Cucamonga was recognized by the State for a comprehensive and responsive Code
Enforcement Program. The City received the largest dollar amount out of three cities in San
Bernardino County, which were approved for the grant money.
The grant revenue will support and assist the costs of the following four areas already existing in
the City's Code Enforcement program:
· Graffiti Abatement
. Contract Services
· Community Outreach
. Inspection Equipment and Resources
The grant revenue will provide for two (2) inspection vehicles, one (1) outreach trailer for
community projects and public relation functions, one (1) graffiti abatement truck equipped with
a color matching computer system, five (5) laptop computers for field work and CD burners for
photo storage, six (6) cellular phones, one (1) TVNCR combination unit and video projector,
one (1). digital camera, five (5) vehicle directional light sticks, a resource library for Code
Enforcement Staff, the rental of roll-off bins for neighborhood clean-up programs, safety
equipment and signage. The Departments of Building and Safety, Engineering and the
Purchasing Division will work together to procure these items.
ANALYSIS
With approval of the grant by the State, it is anticipated that the revenue awarded would help to
enhance the productivity and effectiveness of the already established Code Enforcement
Program. There is no anticipated financial impact to the City. The grant is 100% funding with no
matching funds required. Total grant amount $193,554.00
Trang Huy h
Building and Safety
-2 -
OIL;
RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A
Will',,"'''~~'~' "~~<" - ~~;;:~'<.; ~.. ~
COMMUNITY SERVICE.,
,,,;;.,:;~,,;;;-;~,<'
-
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BY:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Central Park:
. Storm Drain construction along Base Line Road is continuing. The construction trailer has
been set. Underground plumbing, electrical and sewer at the pad is complete. The
contractor is beginning to dig the footings for the building foundation. Temporary power has
been delivered to the site. Construction activities have been minimally affected to date due
to wind.
Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project:
. The landscape and irrigation package for the Central Park project is currently out to bid.
The bid opening has been extended to February 10'h, with award anticipated on March 3rd
2004.
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Project:
. McCarthy Building Companies has begun their site work. Work is progressing on the
pouring of foundations and setting columns and shear walls for the west parking structure.
The east structure work began in early February and is following accordingly.
3/S
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
Red Hill Park:
.
Field renovation of 60' Little League field is complete this week with the turf infield mowed
and edged, the pitcher's mound rebuilt and brick dust ripped and leveled.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
. The Senior Advisorv Committee will hold their next regular scheduled meeting on Monday,
February 23, at 9:00 a.m. During the past month the Committee has worked tirelessly on
projects relating to fund raising for various aspects of the new Senior Center as well as new
programs and services for the entire community.
. Come and celebrate Fat Tuesday at the Senior Center annual Mardi Gras Celebration on
February 24, 10:00 a.m. You'll enjoy the renowned Coyote Hills Jazz Band, traditional food
including king cake and beignets, and door prizes. Bring beads for tossing!
Human Services:
. Free Tax Counselina - Volunteers from AARP will be preparing tax returns for all members
of the community every Tuesday and Thursday, from 12:30 - 4:30 p.m., through April 15.
Appointments are not necessary; guests will be assisted on a first come, first served basis.
. Senior HelD Line - The Help Line (909) 596-1111 is a free service which will guide one
through the maze of local senior services, with quick and easy information about hundreds
of agencies.
. Commodity Distribution - On the first Monday of every month the San Bernardino County
Food Bank provides surplus food to low-income residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Food is
packed, distributed and delivered by Senior Center volunteers. The food is distributed from
1 :30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. or until the food runs out.
. HICAP - A volunteer counselor from the State of California Health Insurance Counseling
and February 6 & 20, between 9:00 a.m. and 1 :00 p.m. The HICAP program assists
individuals and families with Medicare problems and other health insurance concerns.
Trained and registered volunteer counselors proVide Objective information on Medicare,
Medicare supplement insurance, managed care, long-term care planning and health
insurance. Community education, individual counseling and some legal services are also
available and are administered through the San Bernardino County Department of Aging
and Adult Services.
. AaeWise - An outreach program for healthy aging. The goal of the AgeWise program is to
provide free in-home counseling services to older adults to maintain the best possible
physical and mental health. Services include: senior peer counseling, support groups, and
educational classes. For more information, call 1-800-451-5633.
. AARP Driver Safety Proaram - This eight-hour course taught in two four-hour sessions over
two days are espeCially designed for motorists 50 years of age and over. After completing
the class participants will receive a certificate issued by the DMV that enables them to apply
for an insurance discount. Cost is $10 per person. Bring check to first class payable to
3/1,
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
"AARP". All participants must attend both classes to successfully complete the course. Call
477-2780 to register. Classes are offered every month.
.
Safe Return Proaram - The Alzheimer's Association Safe Return Program assists in the safe
and timely return of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. This service
is provided for those individuals who tend to leave their residence and become lost. The
Senior Center is a registration site and can provide the following benefits: Identification
products, national information and photo database, 24 hour toll-free crisis line, fax alert
notification system, local Alzheimer's association chapter support and wandering behavior
information and training.
.
During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Senior Transportation Proaram sponsored by the City
and the Rancho CucamongalFontana Family YMCA provided 2,560 rides for seniors to and
from the Senior Center.
Trips and Tours:
. Santa Anita Horse Races and Lunch. February 21, 2004. And we're off! ... To the races that
is, at Santa Anita, "The Great Race Place". Upon arrival at one of America's most
celebrated sporting landmarks, our hostess will escort us our reserved seating in the
Clubhouse where you'll enjoy head-on viewing of all the days races. Each guest will receive
a program and a professional handicapper will be available to go over the day's races. We'll
also be served a luncheon as we sit back and "play the ponies". Cost: $52.00 per person.
. Murder Mvsterv Dinner Train. February 28, 2004. After a bus ride to Fillmore, we'll embark
on an evening train ride and enjoy a delectable dinner of Prime Rib and Sauteed Shrimp
(vegetarian meal available upon request), hearty laughs and some-Iess-than-serious
sleuthing. Enjoy a first-class, full course dinner, served while actors commit mirth and
murder. Jump right in and help solve the murder, or simply sit back, be waited on and
entertained on board the only Murder Mystery Dinner Train in Southern California. No host
bar service available. $98.00 per person.
. The Gettv with lunch at Lawrv's Prime Rib. March 6, 2004. We'll travel to the original
Lawry's Prime Rib restaurant where you'll enjoy a 3-course meal including your choice of
Prime Rib or Salmon. Then it's off to the Getty museum, where the tour starts with a tram
ride to the summit, taking in unexpected views of historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum
you can watch a brief orientation film. From there you are free to experience all the Getty
has to offer at your own pace. $43.00 per person.
Volunteer Services:
. The table on the next page summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer
usage for the month of December 2003 and year-to-date:
J/7
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
Month: December 2003 YEAR TO DATE
1# of flof
~olunteers # of Hours $ Value Volunteers # of Hours $ Value
~dmin 5 15 210 65 263 3,682
Sports N/A N/A N~ 1 ,444 11,395 159,530
Sr & Human 41 286 4,004 706 4,713 65,982
Services
Special 49 170 2,380 270 1,903 26,642
Events
1Y0uth 122 439 6,146 1 ,460 7,589 106,246
Programs
TOTAL 217 910 12,740 3,945 25,863 362,082
.
Based on $14 per hour
Teens:
· The table below summarizes teen proQram participation for the month of January 2004:
ation - Janua 2004
. The Spruce Park Skate Park Staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to
promote safe skating by handing out donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing
their proper gear. The numbers have gone down due to daylight saving time. The
weekends still draw a crowd of all different ages. During the month of February staff will be
making skate safely assemblies in 6 local elementary schools. The targeted age group for
the assemblies will be the fourth grade, which is the age suggested by our Police
Department.
Youth Activities:
. Plavschool registration for our winter session is currently at 669 students in 42 classes. All
classes are filling up quickly with waiting lists developing for many of our classes.
. The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a fun neighborhood event.
The Fun on the Run Unit program is going very well this fall. This past
month 856 children was served through the prowam at 5 park sites. The
program runs from January 5th through March 26 h, Monday through Friday
from 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm. The table on the following page outlines the
parks being visited during the reporting period:
~lf2~Ilf
CmOFo.oNCHOo.K:.t>'IONGA
c-nu..ltrhnk..o.,p..........
3/6
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
Park Location
Bear Gulch Park
Hermosa Park
Old Town Park
Da Creek Park
Windrows Park
Youth Enrichment Services Grant Program: ~ FIRST 5
~ SA.N BERNA.RDINO
. The table below illustrates attendance/participation figures for programs/services provided
through the YES Grant for the month of January 2004.
Program Attendance/Participation
FACTS Center Visits 1 ,485
Parent Education Classes 12 classes; 73 participants
Car Seat Checks 55
Child Care 38
Youth Sports:
. The next Sports Advisorv Committee meeting will take place on April 14, 2004. At this time
fall/winter field allocation requests will be due for the timeframe of August 1, 2004 through
January 31, 2005.
. The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # of Age/Gender # Teams
Participants
Pee Wee Basketball 244 3-5/boys & girls 24
Youth Basketball 950 6-16/bCl}'s & Qirls 120
Rancho Cucamonga Middle 69 6-17/boys & girls 6
School (RCMS) Youth
Basketball
Rancho Cucamonga Middle 21 3-5/boys & girls 2
School (RCMS) Pee Wee
Basketball
Cucamonga Middle School 70 6-14/boys & girls 7
(CMS) Youth Basketball Practice
Cucamonga Middle School 20 6-Adult N/A
(CMS) Judo
RC Family Sports Center:
. The table below and on the next page provides drop-in/open plav participation at the Center
for the reporting period:
Activity # of Participants
Adult Basketball 620
Youth Basketball 1,384
Adult Racquetball 423
~/1
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
Activity # of Participants
Youth RaCQuetball 67
Adult VOlleyball 51
Youth Volleyball 85
Jazzercise 1,180
. The table below summarizes organized adult activitv at the SDOrts Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Racauetball 20 AdulUMales N/A
Basketball (full court) 100 AdulUMales 10
Basketball (3-on-3) 40 AdulUMales 4
Adult Sports:
.
Four (4) adult softball tournaments are scheduled at the Epicenter and Adult Sports
Complex during the month of February 2004.
Thirty-two (32) adults are participating in our tennis leaaues.
The table below summarizes adult SDortS activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
.
.
Activity # of Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,432 152 Males/Females
Soccer 720 45 Males/Females
Flag Football 110 11 Males
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
.
Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sDort fields for non-Drofit oraanized youth sDort leaaues. For the reporting period,
10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 59,907 participants and spectators
enjoying our parks during both practices and game times.
Special Events:
.
Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the Community Services Department are
meeting to plan this year's Cinco de Mayo celebration that will take place on Saturday, May
1, 2004, at Old Town Park. The event will run from 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. and will
include traditional mariachi bands, dancers and authentic Mexican food.
.
Staff is currently programming our upcoming summer events for 2004 including: the 4th of
July celebration at Chaffey College, Concerts in the Park and the Movies in the Park series.
Performing and Cultural Arts:
Rehearsals for "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor@ Dreamcoat" continue up to opening
night which is scheduled for March 25th at 7:30 p.m. at Alta Loma High School Theatre.
Eighty-give (85) community members between the ages of 10 and 65 will be showcased
through this, the City's 5th community theatre production. Show dates for the production are
Thursday, March 25th, Friday, March 26th, Saturday, March 27th at 7:30 p.m. and Sunday,
32.b
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
March 28th at 2:00 p.m. Cost per person is $8.00. The box office at the Alta Loma High
School Theatre opens 45-minutes before curtain.
Park and Facilities:
. The table below provides information on park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the
month of January 2004.
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications of
Processed Rentals
Red Hill Community Park Picnic 435 8 10 38
Shelters
Heritage Community 235 9 9 20
Park Picnic Shelters
Hermosa Park Picnic Shelter 50 2 2 10
Milliken Park Picnic Shelter 20 1 1 1
Coyote Canyon Picnic Shelter 0 0 0 0
Civic Center Courtyard" 0 0 0 0
Amphitheater 70 2 2 10
Equestrian 212 8 10 71
. .
* Not avaIlable due to CIVIC Center constructIon project.
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
. Equestrian Center usaae for the month of Februarv 2004 is shown in the table below:
Date
Februa 5
Februa 12
Februa 17
February 23
.m.
Grou
Alta Loma Ridin Club
E uestrian Patrol
Alta Loma Ridin Club
4-H Club
Facilities:
. The table below displays buildina rentals and recreation contract class attendance numbers
for the month of January 2004.
Activity Program Number Attendance
Lions East Rentals 96 bOOkings 900
Lions East Building 519.5 facility hours 7,138
Lions West Rentals 213 bookings 3,520
Lions West Buildina 947 facility hours 7,967
Winter Session Recreation 310 classes 19,273
Contract Classes
. Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the eauestrian center to address
maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and
supportive of the City's efforts.
. Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in
need of assistance.
.321
City Council
Parks. Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
Departmental/ Citywide Marketing:
. Marketing efforts continue being implemented for the promotion of the Promotina Arts and
Uteracv (PAL) fundraising campaign.
. "Building the Dream - Central Park Groundbreakina Event" began airing on RCTV3 at the
end of January assisting to inform residents about the construction of Phase 1 of Central
Park that is currently underway.
. The on-line sign-up for our Central Park Newsletter via the RCpark.com website generated
many registrations even prior to implementation of the promotion campaign. The newsletter
will be promoted in the spring issue of the Grapevine.
. The bi-monthly Central Park Newsletter inaugural issue was distributed the last week of
January and is now available for download on the RCpark.com website. The next issue will
be published in March 2004.
Park and Recreation Commission:
. The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission is scheduled for February 19,
2004. At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon by the
Commission:
>> Update on Senior Advisory Committee.
>> Update on Sports Advisory Committee.
>> Update on Community Foundation.
>> Update on Central Park Project.
>> Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project.
>> Annual review of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating
to inventory and facility needs analysis.
>> Fund 20 review and budget recommendations.
>> Trails priorities annual review.
>> Consideration of resolution regarding the Park and Recreation Commission's
meeting place.
>> Update on the senior nutrition program.
>> Consideration of Sports Advisory Committee's recommendation regarding the
request for membership and use of fields by Junior All-American Football.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
. The Rancho Cucamonaa Community Foundation met on Tuesday, February 10, 2004. The
following items were discussed/acted upon at this meeting.
>> Recommendation regarding the 2004 Community Foundation Gala.
>> Discussion of Board Member goals and objectives for the PAL Fundraising
Campaign.
>> Discussion regarding the Community Foundation's by-laws and board structure.
>> Foundation member update on solicitation efforts for the PAL Fundraising Campaign.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
. The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period:
J12..
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
February 18, 2004
~ Tommy and Mike Productions - Car Sale - January 21,2004 through January 26,
2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
~ Quakes/Angeles - Youth Baseball Clinic - January 31, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium.
~ Safeway, Inc. - Corporate Video Filming - February 9 and 10, 2004 - Epicenter
Stadium.
~ Charter Media - Quakes Commercials - February 11 and 12, 2004 - Epicenter
Stadium.
. Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the
Epicenter:
~ Priority Marketing and Promotions - Car Sale - March 3, 2004 through March 8,
2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
~ Abundant Living Family Church - Easter Services - April 10 and 11'", 2004 _
Epicenter Stadium and Baseball Fields.
~ Mt. Baldy Boy Scouts of America - Scout-O-Rama - April 30 _ May 2nd, 2004 _
Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex - Soccer Fields.
~ Maintenance Superintendents Association - Mini Equipment Show - May 27, 2004 _
Epicenter Parking Lots A & B.
~ RC Police Department - Bike Rodeo - June 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
~ Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - All-Star Game - June 8, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium.
~ Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation - June 10, 2004 - Epicenter
Stadium.
~{wd
Joe O'Neil
City Engineer
1:ICOMMSERVlCouncil&BoanlslCityCounc;/lStaffReportsI2004Iupdatel. 21. 04.doc
J23
THE CITY OF
I
RANCtlO CUCAMONGA
- ~------'----,
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LOCAL TAXPAYERS AND
PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTION ACT, A STATEWIDE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO
REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY
CONFISCATE LOCAL TAX FUNDS
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution supporting the Local
Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act, a statewide ballot initiative to require voter approval
before state government rnay confiscate local tax funds.
Backaround
For more than a decade, the California State Legislature has been taking away increasing
amounts of local tax dollars that cities and counties use to provide essential services such as
pOlice and fire protection, roads, parks, libraries, and senior and youth programs. On
September 10, 2003, the General Membership of voting delegates of the League of California
Cities unanimously passed a resolution supporting a statewide ballot initiative to protect local
funds from the State.
The Local Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act is the initiative sponsored by the League,
the California State Association of Counties, and the California Special District Association.
Planned for the November 2004 statewide ballot, the initiative is intended to increase local
control over local tax dollars and ensure that funding for critical services is more dependable
and predictable. The measure would:
. Require voter approval before the Legislature can reduce local government revenues or take
them for State, rather than local, purposes; and
. Require the State to reimburse local governments for the costs of provided new or expanded
programs mandated by the State.
3J./f
February 18, 2004
Staff Report: Approval of a Resolution Supporting the Local Taxpayers and Public Safety
Protection Act
Page 2 of 2
The League commenced statewide signature gathering efforts on February 9, 2004, with a goal
of collecting 1 million signatures by April 15, 2004 to qualify the initiative for the November 2004
ballot. The League has requested that all cities support this initiative. Considering the past
takeaways of City funds by the State and the continued use of local funds to balance the State
budget, staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution supporting the Local
Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act.
Respectfully Submitted,
Yvt1~ b~
Michelle Dawson
Management Analyst III
Attachment
.
d2.S
RESOLUTION NO. () t{ - () oS 1
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LOCAL TAXPAYERS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
PROTECTION ACT, A STATEWIDE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE VOTER
APPROVAL BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY CONFISCATE LOCAL TAX FUNDS
WHEREAS, for more than a decade, the California State Legislature has been taking away
increasing amounts of local tax dollars that local governments use to provide essential
services like police and fire protection, roads, parks, and libraries; and
WHEREAS, since 1991 more than $30 billion of local property taxes have been drained from
cities, counties and special districts, costing cities alone $800 million in Fiscal Year 2003/04
and $6.9 billion over the last 12 years; and
WHEREAS, in recent years the state has shifted costs for state-sponsored programs and
delayed constitutionally required reimbursements to local governments for state mandated
programs and services, thereby burdening local government budgets and taking funds that
should be used for important local services; and,
WHEREAS, the adopted state budget for FY 2003/04 assumes an on-going structural deficit
of approximately $15 billion, putting local government funding at on-going risk for future
years; and,
WHEREAS, it is entirely possible that the state will continue to use local funds to balance
the state budget unless the voters limit the power of the legislature and the Governor to do
so; and
WHEREAS, the voters of California are the best judges of whether local funds should be
diverted, confiscated, shifted or otherwise taken to finance state government; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Voting Delegates of the League of California Cities at
its September 10, 2003 meeting voted unanimously to support a statewide ballot initiative to
empower the voters to limit the ability of state government to confiscate local revenues to
fund state government operations and responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, the League has requested support for a ballot initiative, titled "The Local
Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act", which requires voter approval of any state law
that reduces the sales, property, and vehicle license fee funds of cities, counties and special
districts and clarifies the state's duty to reimburse cities in a timely way for new mandated
programs or higher levels of service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby expresses its strong support for the
Local Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act, a statewide ballot initiative to allow voters
to decide whether local funds may be taken, confiscated, shifted, diverted or otherwise used
to fund state government operations and responsibilities; and
.52.t
Resolution No.
Page 2 of 2
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the City may provide impartial informational materials on the
initiative understanding that no public funds shall be used to campaign for or against this
initiative.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 2004.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 18th
day of February, 2004.
Executed this _ day of
, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
62.7
THE CITY OF
h; '>, ,j, ;;id~<;-<.;',(\. [l-';;)
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
/!j:}
',I
Staff Report
DAlE:
TO:
February 18, 2004
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 57 (THE
ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT) AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE
CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT) ON THE MARCH BALLOT
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution supporting Propositions
57 and 58 on the March ballot.
Backaround
The State Legislative Analyst's Office reports that the basic budget problem facing the State
involves an ongoing structural deficit between existing expenditures and revenues of
approximately $15 billion annually. Governor Schwarzenegger's proposal to address the State
budget crisis includes the "California Balanced Budget Package"-two propositions on the
March statewide ballot summarized as follows:
Proposition 57--"The Economic Recovery Bond Act": A key element of the State's current year
(2003/04) budget was the authorization of a $10.7 billion deficit financing bond. This bond was
to be secured via the "triple flip" funding mechanism which takes one-half cent of cities' sales tax
revenues as a dedicated revenue stream for the bonds in exchange for a like amount of
property taxes from schools. The $10.7 billion bond proposal is currently being challenged in
court. Proposition 57 authorizes the state to issue a bond up to $15 billion to deal with the
budget deficit. If approved by voters in March, the bond authorized by this measure would be
used instead of the original $10.7 billion bond. The "triple flip" will also fund this bond, however
it requires only one-quarter cent of cities' sales tax revenues as compared to the half-cent swap
in the original bond mechanism. Bond repayment is also accelerated with funding from the
"Budget Stabilization Fund" created by Proposition 58.
Proposition 58-"The California Balanced Budqet Act": This proposition would amend the State
Constitution by making changes related to (a) the enactment and maintenance of a balanced
State budget, (b) the establishment of specific reserve requirements, and (c) a restriction of
future deficit-related borrowing.
(a) Balanced Budget Provisions: current law requires the Governor to submit a balanced budget
by January 10 of each year, however the requirement for a balanced budget does not apply to
the budget ultimately passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. Proposition 58
32.C6
February 18, 2004
Staff Report: Approval of a Resolution Supporting Propositions 57 and 58
Page 2 of 2
requires that the State's budget be balanced when adopted. It also allows the Governor to
declare a fiscal emergency if the State is facing revenue shortfalls or increased spending
during the budget year. When declaring a fiscal emergency, the Governor is required to
propose legislation addressing the problem. If the legislature fails to act on legislation
addressing the fiscal problem within 45 days, it would be prohibited from acting on any other
bills or adjourning until such legislation is passed.
(b) Special Reserve Requirement: Proposition 58 requires the creation of the Budget
Stabilization Account in the State's General Fund. Transfers would be made into this account
each year in increasing percentages until the account reaches $8 billion or 5% of the State's
General Fund revenues (whichever is greater). Each year 50% of the annual transfers are to
. be used for repayment of the bond authorized in Proposition 57. The other 50% could be
transferred to the General Fund to cover budget shortfalls.
(c) Prohibition Against Future Deficit Borrowing: Subsequent to the issuance of the $15 billion
bonds authorized in Proposition 57, this measure would prohibit most future borrowing to cover
budget deficits. This restriction applies to general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and other
types of long-term borrowing. The restriction does not apply to short-term borrowing to cover
cash shortfalls or borrowing between State funds.
The provisions of Propositions 57 and 58 would only become effective if the voters approve both
measures.
Since the State continues to take away local government revenues to help solve their budget
problems, our City could be faced with additional threats to our local revenues if the State's
fiscal condition continues to decline. If the State is unsuccessful in issuing a bond to finance its
current deficit, existing City revenues sources could be severely reduced. Therefore, the
passage of Propositions 57 and 58 may be critical to the protection of the City's local funding
sources. As such, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
expressing support for Propositions 57 and 58 on the March 2004 ballot.
The League of California Cities Board of Directors voted on February 7, 2004, to support
Propositions 57 and 58. The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously
to support these propositions on January 27, 2004. In a letter dated January 29, 2004, (see
attached) the Board of Supervisors requested cities also take a position in support of
Propositions 57 and 58.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~V~
Michelle Dawson
Management Analyst III
Attachment
32.ct
RESOLUTION NO. tJI./-05<!
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 57 (THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND
ACT) AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT) ON THE
MARCH BALLOT
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's financial health could be threatened if the
State's fragile financial condition continues to decline; and,
WHEREAS, if the State is unsuccessful in issuing a bond to finance its current deficit,
existing City revenue sources could be severely reduced through additional takeaways by
the State; and,
WHEREAS, the passage of Propositions 57 and 58 may be critical to the protection of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga's existing revenue sources; and,
WHEREAS, Proposition 57 will authorize the State to issue a bond up to $15 billion to pay
off the State's accumulated General Fund deficit which is critical to the resolution of the
State financial crises; and,
WHEREAS, the issuance of the Economic Recovery Bond authorized by Proposition 57 will
eliminate the need for the State to issue the $10.7 billion deficit financing bond authorized by
the Legislature thereby reducing the State's reliance on the "triple flip" financing from one-
half cent to one-quarter cent of the cities' allocation of the statewide Sales tax rate; and
WHEREAS, for many years, cities have been negatively impacted by the uncertainties of
the State's current budget process; and,
WHEREAS, the passage of Proposition 58 will require the implementation of several
improvements to the State's budget process; and,
WHEREAS, the passage of Proposition 58 will require the State to enact and maintain a
balanced budget and will place limitations on future long-term borrowing to finance future
State deficits; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements to the State's budget process provided for in
Proposition 58 have the potential to reduce many of the uncertainties that cities have
experienced under the State's current budget process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that the City hereby expresses its support of Proposition 57 and Proposition 58.
~3D
Resolution No.
Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 2004.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 18th
day of February, 2004.
Executed this _ day of
, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
3!/
"oaril of ~up.erui!iot!I
<!tounty of ~an i.entarilino
DENNIS HANSBERGER
CHAIRMAN
SUPERVISOR, THIRD DISTRICT
January 29, 2004
Mr. Jack Lam
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Mr. Lam:
On Tuesday, January 27, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted
to take a position in support of Propositions 57, the Economic Recovery Bond, and 58, the
Balanced Budget Act.
According to the Legislative Analyst's office, the $15 billion bond proposed in Proposition 57
would provide the state additional one-time funds to address its budget shortfall.
.. Proposition 58 seeks to amend the Constitution so that a balanced budget must be passed each
year. Should the budget begin to fall out of balance during the year, the legislatute would be
required to take action. Proposition 58 would also set up a special reserve account that is set
up to reach $8 billion (5% of the General Fund).
The Board of Supervisors believes adoption of these two important propositions will begin to
start the process of moving Califomia's State Budget towards structural balance. Your support
in the form of a resolution or a position of support would be genuinely appreciated.
Enclosed is a draft example of the position the County of San Bernardino has taken to assist
your staff in preparation of a resolution for your consideration.
Sincerely,
A//N~~ d- L
DENNIS HANSBERGER
ChairmanlThird District Supervisor
t~~
Vice-Chairman/First District Supervisor
~6r_
PA L BlANE
Second District Supervisor
Pd4' ~,U~..,J
PATTI AGUIAR
Fourth District Supervisor
DH/sdr
San Bernardino County Government Center. 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Fifth Floor. San Bernardino. CA 92415-0110 . (909) 387~4855
Yucca Valley Office. 57407 Twentynine Palms Highway. Yucca Valley, CA 92284 . (760) 228-5400 ~ ~2.
Big Bear Lake.Office . 477 Summit Boulevard. Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 . (909) 866-0140 00
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r --- -------- --------l
CITY CLERK'S OffICE
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AlCP, City Manager /
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk/Records Manager ~
DA~:
February 18, 2004
SUBJECT: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM L 1
(PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS FROM WILLIAM TRUDEAU)
The City Clerk's office received a phone call from Mr. Trudeau advising he is unable to
attend this evening's meeting.
Staff will reschedule this item for the March 3, 2004 agenda.
January 1,2004
My name is William Trudeau a resident in the city of Rancho Cucarnonga. I've asked to
speak at the next city council meeting regarding the cities roofing ordinance. On April 17 ,
2003 I made a written request to speak at a planning commission meeting regarding the
cities roofmg ordinance. The requested change that I put forward to the committee was to
allow the homeowner the opportunity to freely choose between multiple types of roofing
products. The city ordinance as it stands, mandates that a home with a tile roof in need of
replacement must be replaced with tile. Homes with composition or wood shake may be
replaced with either composition or tile. In my meeting with the planning commission I
addressed four areas of comparison: I. Fire rating, 2. Wind rating, 3. Walk ability, 4.
Aesthetical comparison.
1. The fire rating of both tile and composition roolS are both rated as a class A fire
rated product.
2. The wind rating was essentially the same for both products.
3. The walk ability comparison was done to illuminate the problems with tile. First
the tile manufacture does not cover broken tile from being walked on.
Homeowners on occasion may need to perform maintenance such as cleaning out
chimneys, as well as valley flashings that accumulate tree litter; tile roolS utilize
the tarpaper beneath to shed the water. This paper deteriorates and creates a leak
from the accumulation of leaf litter. Standard weight tile is less likely to break
from walking however light weight tile is almost sure to break. Common
maintence would cause a homeowner to replace tile at his own expense. Last but
not least we saw frrefighter through out our community protecting structures from
advancing wild fires last year. Typical structure protection places fire fighters on
roolS in order to save homes. As a firefighter I know composition roofs are much
safer to work on. Composition is not as slippery as tile when wet and with tile I
pose a risk of breaking the tiles on the roof, thus damaging the very structure I'm
there to protect. The composition and the tile roofs are both Class A fire rated
materials as well.
4. Aesthetical comparison is the reason the city has the current roofing ordinance.
The planning committee has made it very clear that many years ago they were
directed by past councils to write a roofmg ordinance that prevented composition
roofs within the city. This was because the past councils feh that composition
roofs were an aesthetically downgraded material from tile. I had met with Brad
Buller prior to my meeting with the commission and knew this was the area I
must debate. I first showed that composition products have made huge strides in
improving the beauty of their product line over the last 15 years. I provided a
detailed list of homes in very affluent communities such as Laguna Beach,
Brentwood, Arcadia and Laverne. These community's home values are not
suffering from the diversity of roofing products. In some cases these homeowners
333
can afford to re-roofwith any product on the market and they still chose
composition. In some cases the composition products are much more expensive
than standard tile. The planning commission has made a strong stand against
composition roofs based solely on their opinion that they are not equal in beauty
. to tile. They have made allowances for owners with wood shake, or composition
to re-roof with the option of tile or composition, how can that be if composition is
unacceptable based on its lack of beauty. This is clearly disparate treatment for
those with tile looking to re-roofwith composition.
Brad Buller asked ifI could provide a way to change the current roofing code, that would
allow for high end 50 yr composition roof and yet prevent the lower end 20-30yr less
desirable types of composition roofs into the city. lbis could be accomplished by stating
a minimum weight of 450 lbs per square along with a dimensional appearance would
accomplish this request. This language change was presented to Brad with no change in
the status of my appeal.
My end result was that I have presented a strong argument for change however the
commission, by direction of the council, retains the ability to dictate through this type of
code what looks good on my home.
I have included samples of roofing products as well as composition roof brochures and a
list of homes that are roofed with composition products; however the real question I seek
an answer to is the question of freedom of choice? John F. Kennedy once wrote;" The
unity of freedom has never relied on the uniformity of opinion." The leaders of our
country and our communities must remember that freedom of choice is the foundation on
which this country was built. I also realize that governing a city means that a council
must govern against one mans freedom of choice negatively impacting his neighbor's
safety or property value, which composition roofs have no negative impact. The
governing of aesthetics between high quality products is in poor judgment. I honestly
feel that a simple roofing ordinance like the one in place as well as the inability of the
planning committee to see the obvious injunction of every man's unalienable right to the
freedom of choice makes me wonder if this is still America. Under a government that can
arbitrarily decide what is aesthetically beautiful for my home and what is not, we will no
longer live in the land of the free. Do we not celebrate the 4th of July every year and
remember how many lives have been given for a country that believes in freedom?
Would the city of Rancho Cucamonga honestly deny a veteran of our armed services the
freedom of choice, when his sacrifice provides the blanket of security we all have come
to appreciate? I have also included a copy of the Declaration ofIndependence for
inspiration as well as a reminder of what makes this country so great.
Sincerely,
William Trudeau
35,/